LGF

 RetweetFlight 93 Memorialized with Red Crescent

Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 2:04:24 pm PDT

It now looks as if both of the planned memorials for 9/11 (the International Freedom Center in Manhattan and the “Crescent of Embrace” in Pennsylvania) will be monumental insults: Design for Flight 93 memorial chosen.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The heroic struggle by airline passengers who thwarted a terror attack on the nation’s capital on Sept. 11, 2001, will be commemorated in a 2,000-acre memorial site that includes a chapel with metallic wind chimes.

The “Crescent of Embrace” memorial, created by a team of designers led by Paul Murdoch Architects of Los Angeles, was chosen Wednesday by the Flight 93 Advisory Commission. The aim of the one-year competition was to honor the 40 passengers and crew who died after their plane was hijacked and crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania.

And to honor the passengers and crew, these architects have chosen to create a memorial based on the religious symbol of the hijackers.

UPDATE at 9/11/05 3:45:40 pm:

For those who are trying to argue that this design is a pure coincidence, please note the following from the Pennsylvania Post-Gazette, revealing that the jury members knew in advance that this issue might come up, and recommended changing the name to avoid controversy: Flight 93 memorial decried as Islam symbol.

The jurors recognized there could be some backlash because of the crescent. That’s why, in their recommendations, they wrote: “Consider the interpretation and impact of words within the context of this event. The crescent should be referred to as ‘the circle or arc,’ or other words that are not tied to specific religious iconography.”

Advertisement

462 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Bob's Kid  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:05:47pm

I am just sick to my stomach.

Sorry, but I am.

2 newsjunkie_ky  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:06:22pm

What is wrong with these people?

Why can they not see how horrible this is?

3 Free Speech Is Only For über-Libs  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:08:37pm

I'd like to know if "Paul Murdoch Architects of Los Angeles" are blind, ignorant, stupid, Democrats, leftists, Islamic tools or what?

4 madmonaco  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:09:31pm

what the heck were they thinking?

Could you imagine the horror if there was a cross somewhere in the design?

5 Reluctant Democrat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:09:49pm

Monumental symbols of our suicidal self-loathing.

6 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:10:29pm

Oooh, that last link Charles gives goes to my site! Thank you, Charles! No need for me to say anything more -- the images on my site are all that need saying.

7 Wild Justice  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:10:35pm
The aim of the one-year competition was to honor the 40 passengers and crew who died after their plane was hijacked and crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania.

Try again, AP:

The aim of the one-year competition was to honor the 40 passengers and crew who were murdered by Jihadi terrorists after their plane was hijacked and crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania.

8 V the K  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:11:05pm
It now looks as if both of the planned memorials for 9/11 (the International Freedom Center in Manhattan and the “Crescent of Embrace” in Pennsylvania) will be monumental insults:

All three if you consider the Pentagon "Euro-benches and mud puddles" Memorial to be as stupid as I do.

9 Photios  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:11:24pm

How does it happen that America hating leftists seem always to be in charge of memorials to people that they hate?

Why does this keep happening?

I just don't get it. I hope that the Dept. of the Interior kills this "memorial"

+Photi

10 channeling the shah  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:11:55pm

God, we're going to hell in a handbasket...are there any sensible adults out there?

11 newsjunkie_ky  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:12:39pm

Has anyone heard anything about the 'movie' being aired tonight about Flight 93?

12 Mike McDaniel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:13:02pm

What really bothers me is the hand-wringing, boo-hoo-ing nature of the Flight 93 memorial.

This is the site of a victory, not a defeat. A costly victory, but a win just the same. Somber and joyful at the same time.

And I don't think the memorial represents that at all.

13 V the K  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:13:09pm

Good point Wild Justice. AP's language makes it sound like all 40 of them just happen to drop dead at some point after some nice Muslims hijacked their plane... for no particular reason.

14 Buckaroo  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:13:10pm

# 3 F s

Rayra and zombie have uncovered he's part of the faculty at USC and has taken $$ from the Tides Foundation -- need we say anything else?
:-(

CHARLES -- I think zombie has links to the Natl. Park Service contact numbers & addressess -- this desperately needs a blogswarm -- and today would seem apt, eh?

15 heliotrope  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:13:30pm

Perhaps a swastika symbolizing the four flights emanating from the heart of Massachussets liberalism...heck, it could be balanced atop a pole and spin. Of course, there would be no way to get it to face the east ... or maybe there is and I haven't thought it through.

16 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:14:39pm

The name alone is enough to pretty much show where there mind is at.


There should have just planted evergreens that spell "Allah u Ackbar" and be done with it.


This was no innocent accident. This was some bizarre notion of "enlightenment", the same small percentage of moonbats after 9-11 who opposed any retaliation.


The NYC monument idea is the equivalent of opening a museum to Hiroshima and Nagasaki next to the Arizona Memorial, with a wing of the museum dedicated to perceived grievances of the Japanese that led to the attack, and this is the equivalent of planting Ford Island with white flowers, with a ball of red flowers in the middle, and calling it "The Rising Sun of Peace", and doing it before the war ended.

17 lookout  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:19:25pm

11 nsjke

Discovery Channel: 9,11 and 1am

18 sven10077  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:20:00pm

this kind of junk will embolden the opfor and lead to the day coming where we have to give more people "the red necktie of love"...

19 johnCV  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:21:16pm

Time to start writing to your Congressman/Senator.

This shall not be allowed to stand. I'll be damned if MY tax money will fund this abomination.


Congressional Email System

20 Orbit Rain  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:21:48pm

So where are the giant swastica shaped memorial buildings in Germany going up?

21 Truck Monkey  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:22:41pm

The flight 93 memorial should be in the shape of a raised fist directed towards Mecca...

22 lawhawk  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:22:54pm

The IFC has until 9/23 to come into compliance with Gov. Pataki's plan that has the IFC coordinate with a 9/11 family group panel.

If you want to make sure that the IFC doesn't have any involvement in the WTC rebuilding, now is the time to focus your energy on holding their collective feet to the fire.

While we're at it, contact the LMDC and demand accountability as to why they deemed it necessary to give the Drawing Center $150,000 to relocate closer to Ground Zero after they decided that they would not comply with Pataki's plan for coordinating with the 9/11 families.

Many of the people involved in the IFC are part of the LMCC (the cultural group that ran an anti-American laden 'cultural display' earlier this week). Make sure you contact Gov. Pataki to show your displeasure with the process.

Here are a couple of things to take away from the Ground Zero reconstruction:

1) Freedom Tower wont be completed until 2010 at the earliest;
2) The 9/11 Memorial and museum are located below street/grade level;
3) The IFC cultural center is an above ground facility;
4) The transportation center wont be complete until 2009;
5) There is still time to make sure that the IFC has nothing to do with the rebuilding; and
6) There is no reason to pay the Drawing Center to relocate downtown - they're currently in SoHo and can present their anti-Americanism just fine where they are.

23 bj  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:23:40pm

Presented by the Leftist School of Design, Los Angelos, CA (among other institutions of higher liberal learning).

Sad, sad, sad.

24 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:24:20pm

Downtown Indianapolis has a pretty good memorial that is in keeping with the values and traditions that make this country great. Perhaps these "memorial commisioners should take a look at it. Also see Arlington Virginia, Gettysburg PA, Sharpsberg , ect. There are some pretty darn good ones in DC also.

25 Rockdad  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:25:01pm

Etaoin Shrdlu 's image has been removed "due to high band width useage. Can we get this fixed?
It needs to part of the overall picture. The whole thing just disgusts me, I emailed the parks yesterday with my 2 cents.

26 Americain  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:25:53pm

#14

CHARLES -- I think zombie has links to the Natl. Park Service contact numbers & addressess -- this desperately needs a blogswarm -- and today would seem apt, eh?

LET'S ROLL!

27 LC LaWedgie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:26:35pm
"We are Muslims. We love peace, but peace on our terms, peace as laid down by Islam, not the so-called peace of occupiers and dictators."


Peace on their terms, religious icons on their terms, justice on their terms.

ISLAM - PEACE AND JU$TICE.

Kind of like the CAIR commercial they're running now.

28 mpax  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:26:36pm

It's hardly the spirit of "Let's roll." More like, "Let's roll over..."

29 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:26:46pm

Listen up:
The final decision on this memorial has to be approved by The Secretary of the Interior, Gale Norton. I don't agree with some of her policies, but right now we need to set that aside and go straight to the top. Even if every intermediate decision-maker approves of the design, she can veto it. She has the final word.

Let her know that this is completely unacceptable. Gale Norton is one of the most conservative members of Bush's cabinet, so I think she will truly understand why this memorial is unacceptable.

You can send messages to her at the Department of Interior email address

gale_norton@ios.doi.gov

Or use the Web contact from on her Web page.

Phone and snail mail for her office:

Phone: (202) 208-3100

Gale Norton
Department of the Interior
1849 C St., NW
Washington, DC 20240

Do it today!

30 BingoBunny  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:26:59pm

The wind chime tower will I assume look like a Mosque prayer tower. Whats next a rug passed out to each visitor to kneel on?

#21 a finger raised .. u know which one I mean would be nice.

31 Guy_Philly  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:27:13pm

The Crescent of Embrace from the Religion of Peace (COEROP)!

32 Moonbat_One  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:27:55pm

Got bulldozer?

Time to give the anti-Caterpillar protestors another beef to bitch about.

33 nellodee  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:29:07pm

hmm...i guess i could believe that the line of maple groves just happens to follow the natural topology of the ground, but surely using "crescent" in the name is tasteless and insensitive at best, and an ugly, deliberate insult at worst.

34 solomonpanting  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:30:16pm

#21 Truck Monkey

The flight 93 memorial should be in the shape of a raised fist directed towards Mecca...

Or else a heat-seeking missle.
:}

35 Joel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:30:25pm

How about a swastika at the Holocuast Museum in Washington D.C.? Utterly unbelievable!

36 BamaDad  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:30:29pm

#21 Truck Monkey


The flight 93 memorial should be in the shape of a raised fist directed towards Mecca...

Add upright middle finger, then just about right.

37 lawhawk  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:32:58pm

gymnast:

You're right that there are plenty of amazing and moving memorials around the country. The problem is that architects and designers have gone po-mo and take feeling and interpretation over factual recitation of the facts.

We see that in the way that the media says today is the 9/11 anniversary but doesn't include who did it. It is infuriating and it doesn't make any sense unless the media is really against everything that this country stands for.

38 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:33:37pm
39 Paul  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:33:47pm

Per the National Geographic Channel, the last words of the Arab hijacker piloting flight 93 were "Allahu Akbar"...spoken just before he crashed the jet into the ground at 580 mph.

Perhaps this memorial is actually dedicated to him.

40 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:33:53pm

OT, Still looks like Wilmington +/- about 80 km with a Cat 2, and if the 12Z GFDL is to be trusted, by late Thursday into early Friday, sustained tropical storm force winds Eastern Suffolk County, and sustained tropical storm force winds with gusts to hurricane force at the Jean-Francois Qerie and DWI Killer estates Cape Cod and Islands.

41 mommydoc  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:34:00pm

This is what I posted at the National Parks Service website:

Whether it was inadvertent or purposeful, the inclusion of a red-hued crescentic shape for the Flight 93 memorial is not only incredibly inappropriate, but intolerably disrespectful of the memories of the flight 93 victims who were murdered by muslim extremists.
This would be akin to including a giant swastika at a Holocaust memorial.
I am appalled that my tax money would go to such a hurtful and offensive project. Another design must be chosen.
42 mommydoc  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:35:25pm

Heh, Joel. GMTA.

43 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:35:40pm

A couple of Canadian TV viewers on another leading anti-idiotarian blog said the Flight 93 doc has been pre-empted for a special about squids and octopi in the Semi-Great Gray North.

44 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:36:01pm
#25 Rockdad 9/11/2005 02:25PM PDT

Etaoin Shrdlu 's image has been removed "due to high band width useage. Can we get this fixed?

YES! I just fixed it. Thanks for pointing that out. I was clever enough to have downloaded the image just in case that might happen. I have now updated the link on my site to work, but here is the direct link. It goes with this caption:

"Etaoin Shrdlu" has generated an azimuthal equidistant world map centered on the location of the Flight 93 Memorial which seems to indicate that the crescent is oriented toward Mecca.
45 Carl in Jerusalem  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:36:08pm

OT -

Surprise, surprise, surprise (NOT!)

Poll: Palestinians say withdrawal due to attacks

A public opinion poll taken in Gaza showed that an overwhelming majority of Palestinians believed that the armed resistance was the reason for Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
40% believe that most of the credit belongs to Hamas, which carried out hundreds of attacks against Israeli targets.

What a shock!

/sarc

46 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:36:14pm

I'm not sure if this has been posted here yet, but I did post it on the other 9-11 thread: General Tommy Franks and Tom Ridge are on the fundraising committees.

E-mail them. Let them know how you feel, and that you won't give a single cent to this project that is such and insult.

If we are silent now, then we have only ourselves to blame.

Contact information is as follows:

General Tommy Franks - [Link: www.tommyfranks.com...]

Flight 93 Memorial Project's website - [Link: www.flight93memorialproject.org...]

47 taterhead  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:36:18pm

Have you noticed that in this CNN article...no pictures are made available to show the public the 'memorial'. Only at the Post-Gazette paper...and even that wasn't the bird's eye view.

Everybody contact the parks service in charge of this.

48 mommydoc  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:36:48pm

This is the response I got when I submitted my email:

Service Unavailable
The requested service is temporarily unavailable. It is either overloaded or under maintenance. Please try later.

What a surprise.

49 Montaigne's Cat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:37:21pm

“Inspired by the sight of the crescent.” I just came across this phrase while reading an account of the Battle of Kulikovo, which is where Russia in 1380 defeated the march of Islam.

This is from Nicholas Zernov's book The Russians and their Church, published in English in 1945:

“Since the conversion of the Tartars to Mahometanism at the beginning of the fourteenth century, their benevolent attitude to the Church had changed to a hostile one. Russia's defeat would therefore mean the masacre of the population, the profanation of the churches, the suppression of Christianity.”

“On September 8th, 1380, the two armies met at last. No battle in Russian history can be compared with that of Kulikovo Pole. Here occurred the clash between two irreconcilable powers. Four hundred thousand nomads, with their camels and horses and inspired by the sight of the crescent, faced a much smaller army of Russians, gathered under the eight-pointed Eastern Cross. Kulikovo Pole occupies a place in history similar to that of the Battle of Poitiers (732), when France saved the West from Mahometan invasion; or that of the fatal defeat of Kosovo in 1389, which marked the beginning of the five-centuries-long Moslem domination over the Christians of the Balkans. At Kulikovo Pole the advance of the Mahometans was arrested; Russia was to remain a Christian country.”

Here is an idea: let's build a battle flag right on our soil to inspire the Mahometans on the field where our martyrs died fighting Islam's foray into North America.

50 mpax  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:37:24pm

I just dashed off emails to just about everybody at Fox News: O'Reilly, Hume, Gibson, Smith, Hannity. here's the handy link:
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
I'm sure someone will pick it up, if they haven't already.

51 z  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:39:09pm

Has anyone noticed that all the rerun documentaries dealing with Atta or bin Laden portray their story without historical context of the fourteen centuries of islamic jihad? I can't say I watched any of these programs from start to finish, but especially in the case of a mohammed atta story, it makes it seem like he was the beginning of the story, instead of one of the most famous of a long line of killers in a centuries-long battle. Is this part of the deprogramming of anger of Americans, downplaying the role of Islam in the attacks and making it seem like Mohammed Atta was motivated mainly by a personal hatred of western culture?

52 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:39:19pm
#38 Rayra

Great investigative journalism, Rayra! If the world was sane, you'd get a Pulitzer Prize for that. MSM moonbats have gotten the Pulitzer for far less investigative work than what you have just done.

53 toddhisattva  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:42:11pm

Can we question their patriotism yet?

Though the crescent and star is a pre-Islamic Parthian symbol found all over their coinage. Maybe it predates Parthia.

But these days, it's like a black swastika on a white disc in a red field.

I want to see some consistency from the left. I want to see the ACLU sue to remove this religious symbol.

54 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:42:37pm
55 LC LaWedgie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:43:12pm

[Link: www.nps.gov...] is overloaded.

56 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:43:52pm
57 Geepers  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:44:58pm

Crescent of Embrace

Dear Secretary Norton,

It has come to my attention that the memorial for those murdered by islamic terrorists on 9-11 is IDENTICAL to the very symbol of islam.

[Link: zombietime.com...]

Are we honoring those killed that day or their killers?

Sincerely,

58 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:45:02pm

#37, lawhawk. The media is not only this countries Fourth Estate-Fifth Column, but it aspires to be the First Power in co-governing this nation with the Leading Lights (dim that they may be) of the Demo-Dhimmi Party.

59 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:45:34pm

I don't know. y'all...

...I hear what you're saying, but I have to say most of this thread sounds a little paranoid.

It reminds me of all the fist-pounding that went on about the WWII memorial here in DC. "It's an abomination!" They yelled...Looks like 3rd Reich architecture! In the middle of the Mall! What were they thinking?!?!?! I was sympathetic to it at first...and then I saw the memorial. Wrong, wrong, wrong. It's fine...

...all of what you're saying kind of sounds like more of the same, to be honest.

I mean, for one thing, the true similarity to the Islamic crescent is created by superimposing the other image on top of the map. Without that, it just looks like a red curve...It's sort of like seeing bunnies in the clouds: The power of suggestion goes a long way.

For another, the memorial is so damn big, about the only way you're going to see it as it appears in the map is from the Space Shuttle.

I tend to agree more with #12...it's the attitude of the whole thing that's off-putting. These people did something that day: something heroic, selfless, and pro-active...that's what deserves memorialized, not how sad/proud the rest of us felt about it.

60 mpax  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:46:31pm

53 "I want to see some consistency from the left. I want to see the ACLU sue to remove this religious symbol."

In the words of the immortal Duke, "That'll be the day."

I expect to see Islam installed as the official religion any time now.

61 rosh  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:46:39pm

if you aren't sick to your stomach yet:
Blair advised to ditch Holocaust Remembrance Day b/c it alienates young Muslims.

ADVISERS appointed by Tony Blair after the London bombings are proposing to scrap the Jewish Holocaust Memorial Day because it is regarded as offensive to Muslims.
They want to replace it with a Genocide Day that would recognise the mass murder of Muslims in Palestine, Chechnya and Bosnia as well as people of other faiths.
The committees argue that the special status of Holocaust Memorial Day fuels extremists’ sense of alienation because it “excludes” Muslims.


words just fail me

62 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:47:20pm
63 solomonpanting  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:47:40pm

Contact page for Paul Murdoch Architects.

64 Mardukhai  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:48:20pm

During the broadcast of a Turner-made TV movie on the life of Moses starring David Suchet ("Hercule Poirot"), I noticed that the ancient Israelites were all praying like Muslims -- that Moses was praying on the ground on a prayer rug.

As a journalist, I asked the network to send me a review copy of the movie, and it was absolutely clear -- the director had copied a number of Islamic prayer rituals, possibly to get clearance to film in Morocco.

I then took note of a seen in which the camera faced east into the Sinai as "Moses" prayed -- to the south-south east. Not toward the Promised land, but toward Meccah.

In other words, according to Turner, Moses was a Muslim.

Accident? I don't think so...

(By the way, the Tunisian flag is a reversed Ottoman-Turkish flag.)

65 lawhawk  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:48:38pm

#59 OpininginDC:

You're right - they did critique the WW II memorial, and the Vietnam Memorial before that - and it took decades to fund and complete the Washington Memorial. These things are difficult to convey, but would you not agree that a clearly Islamic symbol is present in the architecture and that it was purposefully included for some reason that escapes me.

66 Truck Monkey  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:49:17pm

Try to imagine in '45 coming up with a plan to incorporate the rising sun into a memorial design to sit over the sunken, wrecked tomb of the USS Arizona...can't you say? The greatest generation weren't called the greatest for no reason. We should fight the war first and worry about memorials later. Impossible now I guess with our "therapy" culture. sad

67 cali white bear  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:50:21pm

why not cut to the chase and call this the Martyrs of Allah against the Great Satan Memorial.

68 mpax  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:50:53pm

Re 59:

Isn't it called Crescent Embrace?
This is not even close to "bunnies in the clouds." The fact that seen most clearly from the air is part of why it's so creepy, so subversive.

69 EIDE_Interface  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:50:54pm

#59:

FOAD.

70 Paul  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:51:46pm

Imagine the outcry from the left if the winning design had incorporated Christian or Jewish iconography in the design and was titled "Cross of Remembrance" or "Star of Solace".

Just imagine.

71 Ed Mahmoud abu al Qahool Martyr Brigades  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:53:49pm

69 EIDE Interface- OK, #59 is at best gullible and stupid, and possibly a troll, claiming we are paranoid seeing a crescent in a design titled "Crescent of Embrace" but FOAD is a little strong.

Even ESAD would be a little over the top, IMHO.


I think STFU and STFD are more appropriate.

72 Beldar  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:54:32pm

I would hope, if it comes down to it, the good people of Pennsylvania will physically intrude upon any effort to implement that abomination.

73 Paul  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:54:43pm

Here's an interesting take on the winning design from a blogger with a backround in architecture.

[Link: www.pardonmyenglish.com...]

74 Athos  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:56:04pm

Rayra

Great #38

One little connection can be considered happenstance. However, given those involved, and the amount of connections via symbolism towards the Islamic Crescent - are we really looking at happenstance and coincidence or at a deliberate message.

I am beginning to believe the latter - but not in the knowingly malicious manner - but in the typical political correct, represent all sides, let's not piss anyone off multiculturalism that seems to separate the left from rules and facts of reality.

We'll see the usual denials, the usual dodges, the usual accusation that we are seeing non-existent conspiracies everywhere - but the fact remains - the symbolism of this is particularly disturbing.

If there is something that architects understand - it's symbolism.

75 SwampWoman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:56:28pm

#71 {Ed}

I think STFU and STFD are more appropriate.

From the nuances of hurricanes to the nuances of language. Ed, you are a treasure.

76 FredFryInternational  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:56:33pm

Lets just say that this is some complete misunderstanding and this is all one huge coincidence.

Does not matter, the memorial needs to be changed drastically, because those who hate us are good at propaganda and word will spread through the arab word that:

The one plane that failed to reach its target has been memorialized with the sign of Islam at the very spot that they flew the plane into the ground scorching the mark of islam into America's heart, FOREVER.

That's just me, just think what binladens group will use the memorial for...

77 Vickie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:57:48pm

THEY do THAT..and WE answer with This Abomination. And we are winning? this War. A huh. If you say so.

Is there something OFF? with this or not?

78 JammieWearingFool  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:57:55pm

I for one won't raise any objection if this "memorial" gets vandalized.

What a disgrace.

79 Austin Conservative  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:58:34pm

The guy at Sacred Cow Burgers sums it up very nicely with this graphic

80 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:58:48pm
81 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:59:08pm

#59, opininginDC. You sound like Rodney King trying to be Rodney Kings Wife just after he kicked the shit out of her. This ain't the Rodney King show and your taking a stand is like watching somebody get their legs cut off.

82 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 12:59:30pm
#55 LC LaWedgie
[Link: www.nps.gov...] is overloaded.

Well, you'll just have to use these for now:

paul@paulmurdocharchitects.com

gale_norton@ios.doi.gov

83 EIDE_Interface  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:00:13pm

trolls like #59 are just plain evil motherfuckers.

84 Powderfinger  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:03:39pm

#59 opininginDC

For another, the memorial is so damn big, about the only way you're going to see it as it appears in the map is from the Space Shuttle.

You don't fly much, do you?

85 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:04:34pm
86 Vickie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:06:23pm

Are we some kind of IDIOTS here or am I missing something? You attack the USA and the ATTACKERS get to "mark the territory" with their Moniker. Put their stamp on the place of their attack...A..hah.

87 Austin Conservative  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:06:25pm

Fox news mentioned this debacle last night already with a picture of the crescent.

I want to know who is on this "Commission" who decidec on this design.

We need a list with names, phone numbers, email address, fax, and postal address.

I want to see what other designs were submitted.

I want to know WHY a fricken islamic crescent was picked.

These people owe the families of the victims and the American public some answers!

88 Vickie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:07:48pm

Term: Heading for "National Suicide" comes to MY mind.

I give up..or not. Just discusted.

89 jemima  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:08:04pm

Email sent to my congressman, like this will do any good--Hinchey? Moonbattus extremicus

Dear Mr. Hinchey

Regarding the Flight 93 memorial, I fail to see how a memorial of a RED CRESCENT OF EMBRACE honors Americans when it was Muslim hijackers who caused their death and the Red Crescent is the symbol of Islam.

This is an outrage and I am deeply, deeply offended.

I hope you will express my outrage to those responsible for this completely insensitive choice.

Sincerely

90 Beagle  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:09:12pm

I dub thee...

The Crescent of Disgrace

91 Vickie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:09:45pm

Just for your information: For Islam..putting up Mosques and Symbols of their Religion in the "Public Square" is MARKING THEIR TERRITORY.

92 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:11:42pm
93 ronaldusmagnus  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:12:44pm

Better than persuading Gale Norton, Sect'y of Interior to withhold approval - perhaps the First Ladies, Barbara Bush and Laura Bush could be politely convinced to come forward and express their disapproval of the design. Surely that would stop it in its tracks.

94 Beagle  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:14:26pm

#52 zombie

Great investigative journalism, Rayra! If the world was sane, you'd get a Pulitzer Prize for that. MSM moonbats have gotten the Pulitzer for far less investigative work than what you have just done.


Some of the last Pulitzers for ""news"" photography went for posed photos of jihadis pretending they were in combat wearing MC Hammer pants.

As it eventually turned out, you CAN "touch this."

95 MarcusAurelius  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:14:52pm

#29 Zombie

Thanks for your work on this. Charles, LGF will not allow this to go forward. Your lizards did it before. They will do it
again.

Just sent email to Ms. Norton:

The 'Crescent of Embrace?. The design is totally unacceptable. Has the National Park Service gone mad? A red crescent? It will be vandalized and the guilty will be prosecuted as a hate crime against Islam. Ms. Norton, take action.

There needs to be a firestorm of protest.

96 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:16:51pm
97 Apu Pibat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:18:13pm

Oh, the hell with it. Let's all just buy Korans and fit our women for burqaas.

This country is in deep shit. Half of America thinks we got what we had coming on 9/11, and these people just happen to be in charge of telling the story of what happened through these "memorials"

The propagandists for the jihadis will seize upon this, and the IFC if it ever gets built (God forbid).

98 LesLein  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:18:48pm

One thing people haven't noticed is the colors. If you look at Michelle Malkin's site you'll notice that the dominant colors are red, blue, green, and gold. I don't have a good source handy, but I believe that these are the colors used by Islam.

[Link: michellemalkin.com...]

99 Paul  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:19:10pm

I just read all of this thread and I think Mike McDaniels, #12, shows the best understanding of what happened in the sky over Pennsylvania. It was a victory, the first one in the WOT, and the memorial should treat it as such:

Sober and joyful at the same time.
100 idkfa  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:22:02pm

Murdoch is the architect but the crescent was likely designed by the landscape architect, Nelson Byrd Woltz.

101 wun wabbit wun  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:22:31pm

#29 Gail Nortons website---when I emailed a message regarding the Penna atrocity I got this message in return:
Mail for webteam@ios.doi.gov rejected for policy reasons.

102 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:26:41pm
103 Van Impe  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:26:48pm

Over that the Huffington Post the moonbats see nothng wrong with the crescent. Here's a sample of the comments:

Oh, come on. The crescent shape is present in nature (the crescent moon), in design, even in food (the crescent roll). How absurd to object to this simple and tasteful rememberance!
The objection stems from hate, ignorance, and bigotry. Many Muslims are mourning too. We need more love, understanding, and empathy in our world. Peace.


Another:

The Capitol dome and Washington Monument, when viewed together, are reminiscent of a mosque. The Capitol itself is fronted by a crescent-shaped reflecting pool. We'd better hire Halliburton to redesign our nation's capital.


Another:

Are crescent rolls going to be attacked next as anti-American? Is the Pillsbury doughboy going to Gitmo for terrorist activity?

link if you need it.

104 wun wabbit wun  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:27:26pm

Me again - found this website - the Natl Park Service has to approve the design - so email them with your comments ~

[Link: www.nps.gov...]

105 MarcusAurelius  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:27:32pm

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
---Edmund Burke

To the good men and women of flight 93, thank you.

A Tribute to Flight 93

And now we will not fail you.

106 [Engineer]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:28:06pm

Just sent to General Franks

I understand that you you are on the fund raising committee for the “Crescent of Embrace” memorial for Flight 93.
It would be hard to think of a bigger insult to the crew and passengers of Flight 93 than this red crescent pointing toward Mecca. This was a victory, a costly one, but still a victory. The crew and passengers prevented their plane from being used to attack another building by the Muslim terrorists that had taken control.

Please General, stop this “Crescent of Embrace” and find something more fitting for these brave Americans.

107 Apu Pibat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:31:00pm

#103

No kidding.

The enemy of their enemy is their friend.

Those treasonous scumbuckets would be dancing in the streets if the islamo-facists were to carry out another attack here. The possiblities for Bush-bashing would be endless.

108 Bob Munck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:32:25pm

Thanks, guys; you're giving the whole world a good laugh. And now Charles's name will be linked with Michelle Malkin.

109 minuteman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:33:06pm

If there ever was a need and a mission for a Sledge Hammer Brigade - this is it.

110 [Engineer]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:35:00pm

#108 Bob Munck

And now Charles's name will be linked with Michelle Malkin.

I wouldn't mind having my name linked with hers, but she is already married.

111 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:35:28pm

#108 Bob Munck

And now Charles's name will be linked with Michelle Malkin.

And you're too stupid to know that it's a good thing.

112 Apu Pibat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:35:51pm

Hey Monkey Boy:

FOAD, you BDS-addled POS.

This country would be better off without people like you.

113 MarcusAurelius  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:36:35pm

#103 Van

Knee-jerk moonbats are consistent. If LGF or other sensible blogs oppose the design they are 'commanded'
to ridicule them. Doublethink, remember?

114 Empire1  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:36:41pm

#108

GAZE

115 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:38:35pm

multiculturalists love the insult

116 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:39:00pm
#108 Bob Munck
Thanks, guys; you're giving the whole world a good laugh.

You're laughing now, but we'll be laughing when the design gets changed, which it will.

Laugh all you want. I just want to be there and take your picture at the moment you read that the memorial will be changed.

And now Charles's name will be linked with Michelle Malkin.

You just wish that you could link up with Michelle Malkin. Jealous.

117 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:39:50pm

#108, Bob Munk. You still hanging around here? Most of the shitbirds have already migrated South.

118 LC LaWedgie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:40:13pm

82 zombie -
Thanks. On the way.

119 Austin Conservative  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:41:25pm

Call the Superintendent of the Flight 93 National Memorial at (814) 443-4557. Or fax (814) 443-2180.

I'll be sending a nicely worded fax.

120 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:41:53pm

I just tried to leave Mr. Reingold (sp?) a message but his voice mail was full. I wish I could hear the messages. Oh boy.

121 SwampWoman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:42:35pm

#108 Munch

Thanks, guys; you're giving the whole world a good laugh. And now Charles's name will be linked with Michelle Malkin.

Oh, tell me it ain't SOOO! (Throwing hands up, weeping in despair.) Before you know it, Charles will be linked to Ann Coulter, too. Oh, I just don't think I can bear the shame of Charles being linked to intelligent and attractive females.

/Yeah, whatever.

122 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:42:50pm

#76

I have to agree with you. Thanks for making a salient point.

For all those who decide on the basis of one little post that I'm some source of evil, that's the kind of paranoid BS that won't get you much past the fence post if you really care about this country.

#76, you're dead on, and I agree...the design should change...and what's more, I still stand by agreeing with post #12...memorializing our own emotions, like they mean anything at all, rather than the actions of the heroes on that flight, is the real abomination.

123 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:43:03pm
124 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:44:33pm
125 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:45:23pm

Al Queda will see this memorial as a big waving white flag. No doubt about that.

126 SwampWoman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:46:35pm

#124 Iron Fist

The world will now end. I agree with you 100%.

DAMN, Fist! (Running out door, looking up in sky for giant asteroid or maybe sun explosion.)

127 reno316  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:47:24pm

From the CNN article:

"The winning design was warmly received by more than 50 friends and relatives of the flight victims. They cheered and gave a standing ovation to the design, which was chosen from five finalists.

"It was very important for me for the area to retain its simplicity," said Christine Fraser, 53, of Elizabeth, N.J., whose roommate, Colleen L. Fraser, 51, died in the crash."

Somehow, I can't see the families of the heroes on Flilght 93 sitting 'round the hearth, fire in the fireplace, hot cup of cocoa, and saying "Gee, pa...it sure would warm my heart if the memorial was an Islamic symbol."

Maybe I'm wrong. It's happened once before.

-- JRB

128 Athos  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:49:29pm

#108 TrollassMunck

FLUSH

FOAD

129 jrdroll  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:50:31pm
UPDATE at 9/11/05 3:45:40 pm:

For those who are trying to argue that this design is a pure coincidence, please note the following from the Pennsylvania Post-Gazette,

Its the Pittsburgh Post Gazette

130 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:51:17pm

#122 OpininginDC

For all those who decide on the basis of one little post ...

That's why Charles has an archive. We can see all of your stupid posts. Like this one. Or this one. Or this one. Or this doozy. You've spewed enough here.

131 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:53:28pm

#123 Iron Fist
Let me fix this for you:

Butt Munch thinks that there isn't much worse than being linked to a beautiful intelligent Asian woman.

Much better.

So Butt Munch, you like your women weak and submissive huh?

132 nellodee  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:54:05pm

Here is a link describing the memorial design. It does not name the jurors, but mentions that at least some of the grieving relatives of the victims were very happy with it.
i still think "crescent" is insensitive as part of the name. I don't see how any juror could have missed that.

133 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:54:38pm

Cable saw.

Girdling.

'Nuff said.

134 nellodee  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:56:57pm

oops, sorry jd--same link that you just posted!
i owe you a coke.
;-)

135 aaron's rantblog  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:57:05pm

My proposed memorial design.

136 bonz  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:57:28pm

I find that memorial not only tasteless but lacking in perspective. If it were me or one of my relatives I'd hope they'd design something along traditional lines. Like this:
[Link: www.freefoto.com...]
"The shot heard 'round the World"
or this:
[Link: www.freefoto.com...]
The minutemen

137 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:58:03pm
138 TalkinKamel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:59:06pm

#103 Van Impe

Ever since the 60's, this sort of sneering and turning issues into snide jokes has been one of the biggest weapons of the Left. "OH, YEAH! NOW YOU'RE GONNA WANNA BAN ALL CRESCENTS! LIKE CRESCENT ROLLS, AND CRESCENT MOONS!" Blah, blah, you know the drill---trying to make it out that the opposition is being unreasonable, by exaggerating their objections. This really has to be fought.

(One can imagine, of course, the rage that would ensue if we tried turning the tables on them! "WELL, DUUUH! LIKE YOU'RE SO BOTHERED BY THE CROSS! LIKE, THE CROSS IS A UNIVERSAL SYMBOL! YA GONNA WANNA BAN ALL "CROSS-ROADS" AND HOT-CROSS BUNS NOW, HUH, HUH, HUH?")

And, speaking of Ariana Huffle-puff, and her idiot blog. . .

#121 SwampWoman

LOL, I love it! Bob Munck's probably just jealous, because he himself can't get a date with Huffle-Puff!

Seriously, Bob-O has nothing to say, and should be relegated to GAZE status.

139 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 1:59:48pm
140 Geepers  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:00:29pm
The crescent should be referred to as ‘the circle or arc,’ or other words that are not tied to specific religious iconography.”

Well yeah, we could do that, but seeing how it's not an "arc" or a "circle" I guess we won't.

Hey, here's a plan, don't create a "Crescent of Embrace" and no one will call it a "crescent".

That, or maybe we'll pay Paul Murdoch Architects with toilet paper and call it "money".

141 SwampWoman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:01:06pm

#127 Reno316

Somehow, I can't see the families of the heroes on Flilght 93 sitting 'round the hearth, fire in the fireplace, hot cup of cocoa, and saying "Gee, pa...it sure would warm my heart if the memorial was an Islamic symbol."

If they truly said anything similar to that, they're in need of more help than what Lassie could fetch.

*bark bark bark* "What's that Lassie? Tar and feathers? A NOOSE?"

142 David2  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:03:03pm

These monuments should create anger against modern forces of evil: Islam and Liberalism. I would say they do a great job. Someone they get there with just one design for both.

143 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:03:18pm

#130

Oh, I'm so shocked...there's an archive? Gee...maybe I should cower in terror at your sheer genius of exposing me...How did you ever get so big and powerful? It's just unbelievable...wowww.

Look, I'm really not upset that I'm not falling off the right wing like you are. What's more, it amuses me that as soon as someone suggests anything that's not so far to the right that it generates its own gravitational field, they're branded as a loon. Hell, being devil's advocate around here isn't only good for the likes of you, it's damned amusing for me.

So, I'll join with many of your brethren here, and continue to "spew" At least I have ideas, even if they do put your panties in a wad. Better than some, I'd say...Unless you think posts with single words like "Fatso," "Mutherfucker," etc. don't count as spewing...I think you can look those up in the archive if you want, since you're so clever.

Oh, by the way...LGF won my opinion on this one...and I just e-mailed my representatives to say so...or does that part of this site not matter to you?

144 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:05:39pm

#139 Rayra
Pssst!GMTA!

145 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:06:29pm

121 SwampWoman

I just don't think I can bear the shame of Charles being linked to intelligent and attractive females.

He's got enough posting here...

146 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:06:52pm
147 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:07:12pm

#139, Rayra. Like I said, the guys idea of taking a stand is to cut his own legs off. You can find similar examples of the type on the faculties and administrations of most college campus's. They get away with their bullshit because they have a captive audience of kids who have other things on their minds.

148 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:08:10pm

#139 Rayra

vapid amoral nihilistic POS.

I nominate that for a revolving title.


#143 OpinioninDC

What exactly is your problem? We didn't fall all over ourselves trying to be the first to thank you for your insights and vaulted thinking?

I'm glad you came to the conclusion this planned memorial is a really bad idea, and I hope that you see it does send the wrong message at the wrong time.

The fact that LGF regulars question your posts - content and "logic" - is what this site is about. If you want your ego massaged, there try the koolaid kids at kos, or the dummitudes at DU.

149 Powderfinger  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:08:42pm

#143 OpininginDc

At least I have ideas, even if they do put your panties in a wad.

Really? What kind of ideas?

150 SwampWoman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:08:46pm

#139 Rayra

Go fuck yourself, you pathetic equivocating dissembling Tool.

NICE! Hey, Rayra, can you rewrite my resume? I'm not sure I have enough action words in it. (I just KNOW I can fit the quoted sentence in that resume someplace.)

151 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:09:09pm

#143 OpininginDC

Oh, by the way...LGF won my opinion on this one...and I just e-mailed my representatives to say so...

Even nodroG does the right thing once in awhile.

or does that part of this site not matter to you?

You think doing one good thing redeems all the other stupid things you have done?

Moron.

152 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:10:07pm

OpininginDC

I only read your last post. It will be the last time I read your comments. You are an angry person and you need some fresh air. Your opinion probably sucks anyway. FO.

153 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:10:59pm
154 Powderfinger  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:11:31pm

#141 Swamp Woman

*bark bark bark* "What's that Lassie? Tar and feathers? A NOOSE?"

You talk like that, and I just melt.

*sigh...*

155 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:11:34pm

#150 Swampy

Now that would be a resume to be proud of! It would certainly get a lot of attention, but I'm not sure it would all be good attention.

:-)

156 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:12:46pm
157 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:14:28pm

#156 Iron Fist

I've heard of the Iron Chef making omlettes, but this appears to be a different recipe.

Do you add garlic salt before or afterwards?

158 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:14:40pm

#139

Sigh...Thanks for oversimplifying things to suit your purposes, and for recasting things I said to dress me in your little red-deviled costume.

In the meantime I'm still here learning. If I'm too "lefty" for you, even though I've stated on LGF that I support the War, the President, and the relief effort in NO, why not try to change my opinion rather than just blast away? You don't do much to win me to your side with that post.

Look what lawhawk did with one post that you and reaganite couldn't do with 100 like the two you sent.

So, you go ahead and choose only the parts of what I say that you don't like and blow them completely out of proportion so you can grind your axe with glee. I'll keep listening to the likes of lawhawk.

Can we please get back on topic now? My apologies to everyone for taking up bandwidth dealing with this petty and personal BS.

159 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:16:12pm
160 SnowDawg  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:16:43pm

Could someone please explain this I am not sure I understand? I am Canadian, and I would expect this sort of nonsense here in The Peoples Republic of Canada but I would never have imagined it in America. Is it possible that there are not enough patriotic Americans who know exactly what is happening at this memorial? Who has the power to change this and why were leftists allowed to hijack the current memorial?

Help.

161 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:16:47pm
162 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:17:39pm

158 OpinioninDC

Can we please get back on topic now? My apologies to everyone for taking up bandwidth dealing with this petty and personal BS.

Much better. I'll take you off my 'GAZE' list now.

You are correct that LGF is about debating with honest opponents. But folks that come across too strong, or moonbatty do get taken to task.

163 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:18:02pm
164 George guy  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:18:23pm

I have an easy solution: Turn the crescent into a bow. The bowstring would be a narrow black tarmac path (or a dirt path), and it wouldn't be straight, it would be bent as if the string was being pulled back. And make a long line of flowers to form an arrow that is nocked in the bow. Make a big arrowhead out of some of that WTC wreckage, and engrave "Let's Roll" on it.

And leave it pointed at Mecca. In fact, have a plaque pointing this out.

Arrr, if only America had a National Minister of Symbolism for me to be.

165 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:19:09pm

#158 OpininginDC

Look what lawhawk did with one post that you and reaganite couldn't do with 100 like the two you sent.

I'm sorry, typical L³, when we quote your words you throw a fit. Wht's wrong, can't stand by your own words?

166 steve miller  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:19:21pm

Back to the topic -- perhaps they can put in Arabic on the memorial "Please don't hurt us again -- we surrender."

167 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:20:05pm

#143 OpininginDC

We are at war with people that want to kill you, your family, your dog, your cat, your goldfish, and destroy any form of life here as we know it. But you would rather just make comments to get everybodies panties in a bunch that understand this so you can make yourself feel superior to them.

Thats something to be proud of and tell your grandkids.

168 dr. pangloss  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:20:39pm

oh-oh a Brandeis Connection...

MILENA MURDOCH,
Milena Murdoch, joined Paul Murdoch Architects as Vice President in 2001, after sixteen years of professional experience as a project architect, manager and designer...

Milena has been a registered architect in California since 1995. She graduated from University of California at Los Angeles in 1984, Summa Cum Laude, with a Master of Architecture and from Brandeis University in 1981, Summa Cum Laude, with a Bachelor of Fine Arts.

169 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:20:49pm
170 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:22:02pm

#159, Rayra. You have heard the expression, "too cleaver by half", well in DC they make some that are only "half cleaver enough". Whats the difference between a slow learner and a halfwit?

171 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:22:38pm

#148

No, I don't mind that you disagreed with me...in fact I expect it. I get in the same kind of arguments with hard-line left wingers. I just dont' see the value of calling me a nihilistic POS.

Please continue to question my posts, but if you want teach me something, don't expect me to be upset or moved by the likes of #130 & #139.

#152

I'm not angry...I just had a great day at work and get to spend all day tomorrow with my family...not to mention it's an amazing day outside.

maybe I'll just go outside and flash a peace sign to get a rise out of you! ;)

172 SwampWoman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:23:00pm

#156 Iron Fist

After Rayra gets done with it, let me deliver it. I promise to use my special form of diplomacy. I guarentee you that you will get the job.

(Or dude's brains will be on the resume. You have to break some eggs to make an omlett).

ROFL! Thanks, Fist!

/We'll have a BBQ one day for sure!

173 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:23:16pm

#133 Dar ul Harb


Chain saw.

Firewood.

174 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:24:50pm
175 Checker77  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:25:48pm

Just a f.y.i, it the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, the web site is here...

[Link: www.post-gazette.com...]

176 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:26:07pm
177 Earth2moonbat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:27:58pm

#155 Mafia Princess

A few choice words like are kind of a requirement on a resume to get into your organization, aren't they?

178 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:28:28pm

#162

Point taken.

179 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:28:41pm

#171 OpininginDC

but if you want teach me something, don't expect me to be upset or moved by the likes of #130 & #139.

We quoted you, you moron! I'll ask you again, what's wrong, can't stand by your own words?

180 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:30:45pm

Charles just updated the thread to say the judges knew this would be controversial and wanted renamed to avoid problems.

I'm even more determined to email everyone involved, and contact the my useless State Senator and Representatives, as well as the RNC to say that any Republican that contributes money or support to this project will not get my vote or support going forward.

They KNEW this would be an issue and they went ahead with it anyway.

How f*cking stupid do they think we are, and for that matter are they. /end rhetorical question

181 Geepers  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:32:20pm

OpininginDC,

So what's the possibility of you having the common courtesy to actually address the person you're responding to?

182 SwampWoman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:32:34pm

#174 Iron Fist

Woohooo!

183 Paul  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:32:39pm

When the winning design for the Vietnam memorial was announced there was a firestorm of criticism. Many people opposed it for various reasons but it was built and now it is considered a masterpiece.

The Vietnam memorial was built after the war had ended, but the WOT continues and here we are confronted with a design that has a symbolism that is integral to the people we are fighting. The people who designed the memorial and the jury that chose it are not stupid people and are clearly aware of the meaning of the cresent in Islam. So there had to be a reason for their decision. I think that they are (in a very muddled way) wanting to make a distinction between the terrorists and the Islamic religion. If so, it's a disastrous decision; in a memorial, especially a memorial to the war dead, symbolism is everything and the "Cresent of Embrace" needs to be rejected because it embraces the symbol of our enemies.

184 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:32:53pm
185 Etaoin Shrdlu  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:33:03pm

Thanks Zombie & Rayra. Slightly revised copies are so far still up here and here.

186 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:34:47pm
187 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:34:47pm

Like I posted on another thread. Why isn't there a sculpture of a flaming cross at a site like this to demonstrate forgiveness for past deeds?

MLK memorial

Both are equally offensive and beyond acceptance.

(and no I am not suggesting there should be)

188 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:35:17pm

I have read several comments suggesting that someone should vandalize this red crescent of trees. I hope these comments are not serious. This is symbolism, folks. And the people who are manipulating these symbols would love to see someone they can call a "conservative" break the law so they can call all conservatives extremists and home grown terrorists. Even if this memorial is constructed, it can be opposed and even reconstructed through legal means. Don't give the left-wing third column amunition. Don't even suggest vandalism or other kinds of lawlessness. If there is a better way to memorialize Flight 93, let us find it and see that it is done.

189 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:38:19pm
190 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:38:21pm

#186 Rayra

That's a LLLiberal / Moby Hudna if I ever saw one.

LMAO!

191 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:40:14pm

#160 Snowdawg

Its the same mentality that puts emergency fire fighters and EMT's through sexual harrasment and sensitivity training while people are in dire need of rescue in NO.

Liberalism kills.

192 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:42:45pm

#186 Rayra 9/11/2005 04:34PM PDT

Don't be a sucker. That's a LLLiberal / Moby Hudna if I ever saw one.

Rayra, thanks for the concern it is appreciated as are your insights and, in some cases, hysterically funny tirades.

I remember when LanceKates started posting and he stepped all over himself in one blunder after another and now he's a respected poster. Same for a few others. Maybe OpinioninDC is the same sort. I don't know. I'm prepared to give him/her a chance. Time will tell if it is more Gordon than Kates.

But one thing is constant, that you and reaganite, Iron Fist, and so many more are protectors and defenders, and that you have BS meters that peg off the charts for all the right reasons.

Peace brother. And thank you for your service, then and now.

By the way, how's the leg doing?

193 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:43:10pm

Do you have an e-mail we can finish this with so everyone doesn't have to listen to us argue? Unless everyone wants to...it's just way off-topic and I do feel bad about that.

Yes, I stand by my words...I still think SOME of you are paranoid, for instance. What's more, and as in the case of this thread, I'm stating an opinion a lot of the time, and I am big enough to change that when persuaded I'm wrong...but it's hardly impressive when someone tries to persuade by talking like a Jr. High kid in the locker room.

By the way, you quoted and editorialized, and #139 was anything but quoting with his pithy little rage-ridden "headlines." Neither are really quotes. I'm sure if I dug in the archive I could find things I could recast to make you look bad...even the most disciplined person can be drawn any way someone else wants. But I'm not really interested in making you look good/bad...I'm interested in the ideas discussed.

194 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:43:52pm

#188 Lawrence Schmere

Im sorry, wouldnt that be covered under freedom of speach? ;-)

In that part of PA, the Judge would find you guilty, sentence you to 6 hours of community service (wash the local fire truck) then buy you a beer at the station after your done.

195 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:43:57pm
196 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:43:59pm

#191 hous bin pharteen

Liberalism kills.

More like Liberalism allows you to be killed, guilt free!

197 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:45:24pm
198 MarcusAurelius  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:45:33pm

Just because a family member thinks the design is OK doesn't give him or her a pre-emptive OK. It's been four years and it wouldn't be too difficult to turn one into a tool of the LLL. I mean look at Cindy Whatshername.

The memorial is for the heroes. Not the kin. I wouldn't want some of my kin writing my epitaph:

"Here lies MarcusAurelius. G-d loved him, but everyone else thought he was an a**hole".

(Put the design to a vote of the people with the attendant pros and cons - no contest.)

199 taterhead  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:46:14pm

#50 mpax

I just dashed off emails to just about everybody at Fox News: O'Reilly, Hume, Gibson, Smith, Hannity. here's the handy link

I did see that Fox news mentioned it. The guy filling in for Brit Hume mentioned how that clergyman is up in arms about it.

200 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:47:56pm

#197 Iron Fist

Okay, if you agree with LS again then we have to prepare ourselves for the coming of the apocalyps. Surely this is a sign of the end times.

[ducks under table]

201 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:48:17pm

OK. On second thought, sneak into the park after night fall and rip the bark off of every one of those damn trees.

202 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:48:46pm
203 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:49:22pm

#193 OpininginDC

Neither are really quotes.

You're right, they're just direct links to your words. How silly of us.

204 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:54:10pm
205 lawhawk  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:55:17pm

OpininginDC:

You mention my name as someone who posited a reasonable response, but you never did address my point or comment. So, what is it - why is this an appropriate memorial when the symbology is clearly inclusive of Islamic symbols to the exclusion of all else.

206 FlyingTigress  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:56:27pm
The jurors recognized there could be some backlash because of the crescent. That’s why, in their recommendations, they wrote: “Consider the interpretation and impact of words within the context of this event. The crescent should be referred to as ‘the circle or arc,’ or other words that are not tied to specific religious iconography.”

Note to jurors... For example...Calling something a 'bowel movement' doesn't change the fact that it is sh_t.

Words may have power, but not enough in this instance.

Ahhh... we're probably just a bunch of Herbert's.

/Doc Sevrin

207 Mafia Princess  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:57:52pm

#204 Rayra

Sounds like you have the right formula for the care and feeding of the injury.

Glad you're doing okay.

Have fun... don't kill the mouse too soon. [cats do like to play with their food before they eat it ;-> ]

208 Bubble Girl  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 2:58:41pm

Send in the Beaver OPS Team...

209 bluemerle  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:00:13pm

Hey, feel free to bust out the bandwidth on the original qibla "convincer" too. I had to put up with nutter jokes from my husband and everything.

Seriously, this is not a situation where proof of bad intent is even necessary. It's unfortunate but these uncomfortable associations are there to be made.

It's unnaceptable, however, for this particular monument to have heavy islamic references or symbols, even if they aren't intentional. There can be no islamic imagery or symbolism in THIS place, because the murderers intended to claim it for Islam.

It's in very bad taste. It distracts from the heroism of the passengers and puts the focus on the murderers, and connects very ugly acts with Islam, if you want to look at it the other way around.

210 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:00:37pm

#181

Geepers,

Will do from now on...first blog I've ever subscribed to and still learning the courtesies.

#184

Rayra,

I couldn't agree more...the time ran out on diplomacy at least 5 years earlier...and I think we should've finished the job the first time anyway. My "beef" with the war is with that portion of the population with no stomach for conflict when conflict is necessary, not with current administration policies. In fact my only problem with the administration's approach to the war is really the same complaint: that they had to dress up the war in a way that has come back to haunt them in order to get the country to be o.k. with that which was clearly necessary.

Not only do I live in DC, so do my children. I am grateful every day I drive downtown that Bush had the balls to, in the paraphrased words of Gen. Tommy Franks at the RNC, fight them over there, not over here.

211 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:01:28pm
212 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:01:37pm

lawhawk:

I think "symbology" is the wrong word.

Symbology is the art of using symbols.

Symbolism is the use of symbols.

No?

213 Iron Fist[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:02:13pm
214 D. Edgren (the Merciless Infidel)  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:03:34pm

Sheesh, late to this. Looks like y'all are handling things just fine, though.

I'll be going over to Senator Ted Stevens' Alaska offices tomorrow to let his staff know about the "Crescent of Submission." Ted and DOI (because of its substantial presence here in the Real Great White North) have a pretty good understanding with each other- Ted says "Jump" and Interior generally responds, "How high?" He's also really good on this kind of stuff.

Great job, everyone who has joined in to fight this dhimmitude monstrosity.


D. Edgren

215 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:04:03pm

#210 OpininginDCMoby

In fact my only problem with the administration's approach to the war is really the same complaint: that they had to dress up the war in a way that has come back to haunt them in order to get the country to be o.k. with that which was clearly necessary.

And of course you can supply the links to the "dress[ing] up" they did, right?

216 a.k.a. Will  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:05:24pm
The aim of the one-year competition was to honor the 40 passengers and crew who died after their plane was hijacked and crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania.

The aim should have been to honor the fighting spirit that rose to challenge the barbaric and murderous ideology of the hijackers, and the courage that no doubt saved some other target and groups of potential victims in Washington D. C. How about something that symbolizes a few brave souls rising up against pure evil?

What the hell is a "Crescent of Embrace," anyway? Who's embracing what or whom? This is just more pathetic, dipshit "thinking" we constantly see from the brain addled PC portion of our population. And, I don't think the almost exact rendition of the Muslim crescent is coincidental. Some sick, convaluted notion that embracing those who hate us will somehow bring peace and love to the world. All you need is love. All we are saying is give peace a chance.

Odds are this was designed and approved by some group of aging hippies from the sixties, or those who've foolishly bought into their stupid ideas.

217 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:05:28pm

#211 Rayra
I am tipping my glass to you sir! Awesome post!

218 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:06:59pm

#205

Lawhawk,

Sorry, I didn't mean to not respond...I was just very taken by your first point.

I'm just not sure I see the Islamic symbol in the design...not without that graphic of the superimposed Islamic Crescent, anyway...so it reminded me of what ultimately proved to be baseless criticisms of the look of the WWII memorial, which is a beautiful and moving space.

219 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:07:17pm

"Embrace" the Religion of Peace

220 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:08:59pm

Immanuel Kant was a real piss ant
Who was very rarely stable,
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
Who could think you under the table,
David Hume could out consume
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.

221 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:12:33pm

#213 Iron Fist

I have a counterproposal:

Ground strikes on Mecca, Medina, the airport(s) nearby, and MoonGod Temple itself. Follow up with a series of blasts at the foot of the mountain, ultimately burrowing *underneath it*. Then a series of strikes aimed at lifting the mountain up and depositing it atop the collapsed ruins of the Moon God's Temple, burying it under up to a thousand FEET of rubble.

Finish with a series ground blasts upwind of the site, aiming to contaminate it. We could, alternately, mixed spent nuclear fuel into the soil...

222 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:13:25pm
223 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:15:31pm

#211 Rayra

Ooh, Yeah, that's a Classic!

224 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:16:13pm
225 FlyingTigress  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:17:16pm

#213

Works. Either that, or airlift pieces of the suna'bitch back to Crawford, TX -- to be reassembled into a sculpture shaped like a human's posterior.

"Be our guest. Feel free to make the hajj to America to kiss our stone."

The crescent should be referred to as ‘the circle or arc,’ or other words that are not tied to specific religious iconography.”

Note that the concern was generalized to "...specific religious inconography" rather than "...the religious inconography associated with the hijackers whose actions led directly to the crash of Flight 93, 19 of whom tried to kill 20,000+ U.S. citizens and temporary residents that morning."

226 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:17:18pm

#211 Rayra.

Thanks.
Now I have a headache after reading that.

I think I need a beer.

227 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:19:49pm

#210 MobyOpininginDC

To follow up on reaganite's #215 challenge, we're exquisitely picky about the sources we accept. dKos, DemUnderground, Mad Magazine, National Enquirer, Pravda, and the NY Times all are looked at quite suspiciously. Well, maybe not Mad...

228 FlyingTigress  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:20:00pm

To: Flight 93 Memorial Jurors...

From: K.A. "FlyingTigress" Langley

"I fart in your general direction..."

/French knight

229 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:20:11pm

Some one needs to check out the resume of this architect. Has he written any commentary about symbolism? I would do this research myself but I have a mental handicap that limits my ability to concentrate on any single task for longer than

230 K.  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:20:21pm

Re: extreme measures:

Salt is really, really bad for plants.

I'm just sayin.'

231 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:21:26pm
232 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:25:14pm

#230 I also read it faces Mecca.

I havent really checked that out myself.

233 Geepers  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:26:42pm

OpininginDC (#210),

You picked a mean biker bar to have your first beer. We don't low blow. Or pull punches (often with brass knuckles). Good luck.

234 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:27:06pm

There are three possibilities about the motivation behind the PA Memorial. they are an honest mistake, a defiant symbolic appropriation, and willful malice. More as I tap away...

(Spoiler: I'm in the 'willful malice' camp)

235 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:27:26pm

#227 psginfinity
Want to bet it doesn't supply any?

236 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:28:17pm

#231 Rayra

/Sierra Nevada Pale Ale

Grolschof course! *clink

237 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:29:03pm
238 LesLein  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:29:41pm

Is there anyone with enough knowledge of Islam to address my concern in #98? I read somewhere that red, green, blue, and gold have symbolic importance in Islam. Red is for war, green is for oasis, blue is for the heavens, and gold is for wealth. My source for this isn't known for factual reliability. Can someone help? Thanks in advance.

239 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:29:57pm

It's the Architectural Landscape of Peace

240 FlyingTigress  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:31:30pm

We could always add a suitably heroic statue of a generic American male and female, facing away from Mecca towards the center of the 'arc of the religion of peace'.

iirc, the original Vietnam Memorial had statues of American servicepersonnel added after the fact...

Hell, some 'guerilla art' by some patriot-thinking Americans sounds pretty good if this abomination goes through...

241 hepcat  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:33:07pm

After the memorial dedication, how about having a Pig Roast?

242 FlyingTigress  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:33:45pm

oops... pimf

my.
biggest.
pimf.
EVER.

We could always add a suitably heroic statue of a generic American male and female, facing away from Mecca towards the center of the 'arc of the religion of peace'.

iirc, the original Vietnam Memorial had statues of American servicepersonnel added after the fact...

Hell, some 'guerilla art' by some patriotic-thinking Americans sounds pretty good if this abomination goes through...

243 Bob Munck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:38:14pm

New Orleans is often referred to as "Crescent City." That explains a lot.

244 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:38:18pm

There's no need to fantasize about sabotaging the memorial, or killing the trees, or whatever. It's never going to get to that point. Take all that outraged energy and spend it NOW preventing this design from being built in the first place. If it gets to the point where they actually start pouring cement and planting trees, we will have already lost the battle.

Email, call, fax, gossip. Get the word out. Politicians do respond to pressure -- especially righteous pressure.

I suspect the end result will be a face-saving compromise: The crescent will be altered to be a different shape, but the rest of the design will remain pretty much as is. Paul Murdoch will say that his decision to alter the shape was based on some dreamt-up practical reason -- soil samples this, wind direction that. We'll be happy that the crescent is gone, he'll save face by not appearing to cave in to the NeoCon Wingnut LUNAtics.

Seriously, even the slightest alteration of the curve, or the end-points, or the arc-length will remove the Islamic appearance. Most of the outrage stems from the fact that the design EXACTLY matches the dimensions of the prototypical Islamic crescent, as my gifs show.

How about a nice...

parabola?

hyperbola?

cycloid

..or how about a pathway that traces the route of Flight 93 itself?

The possibilities are endless. They don't have to jettison the whole thing -- just the Islamic crescent shape.

Is that so much to ask?

245 FlyingTigress  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:38:56pm

#241 hepcat

You mean a "good ole-fashioned American bar-be-que at the dedication?"

FLIGHT 93 MEMORIAL CEREMONIES

Menu:

Pork ribs
Pork chops
Pork Sausage
Pork and Beans
Pigs Knuckles

246 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:40:19pm

#211

Rayra,

I don't think of myself as a Hegelian, as anybody can spin around arguments just to manufacture an opposing view. But sometimes I do have an opposing view, and when I don't post to a thread it's because I agree with what's being said. I see now how that approach must make me look to everyone, and will bear that in mind.

That said, part of being critical is doubting some of what you read/see/hear, just as many people do on LGF. That I doubt LGF posts as well as doubting the NYT seems reasonable. The world is neither black nor white, and political/media discussions tend to draw things in such easy but inaccurate simplifications. A righty simplification is no better than a lefty one.

Now then...

I am NOT slapping at Western Religion. I am a Lutheran and believe what I was taught. Therefore, I AM questioning someone who uses religion to say that everyone who doesn't agree with them politically is also and must be a) bad and b) without faith. And I have to say, that's what I mean by paranoid. You look at my old post, and suggest that I hate God, when what I was responding to was a person using, and I would suggest misusing, God to claim a political victory. That misreading potentially says as much about your preconceptions as it does me or the words I choose.


#210

Reaganite,

You mean I have to go find some time the administration said the war would "only take x" amount of months? Or that the insurgency was in its "death throes"? I mean, that was pretty standard fare for a while. And to be clear, I don't resent them saying it...I resent them having to say it just because too many Americans lack stomach and when it's damaged them politically now.

247 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:40:35pm

#243 Bob Munck
FOAD

248 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:42:25pm

#235 Reaganite

Naah, can't take that bet. Those odds are waaay too short for my taste...

BTW: Asahi (clink)

249 hillbilly geek  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:42:26pm

This is getting interesting, y'all.
I've not been able to do as much as I'd like here, but here's my little page, again.
I've added the link to the overview that shows its relationship to Mecca quite well. Good Job!

250 Geepers  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:45:06pm

Bob Munck (#243),

Your comment explains that you don't have a clue, that's for sure.

251 FlyingTigress  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:45:40pm

Well, Lizards...

Time to 'feed my depressed mood' with dinner.

G'nite.

G_d bless America this Patriot's Day, 2005.

"Heavenly Father. Watch over the souls of those who died four years ago and the families left behind, those who served our nation and gave the fullest measure of their devotion, and those who still serve."

252 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:47:16pm
253 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:47:54pm

#246 OpininginDC

You mean I have to go find some time the administration said the war would "only take x" amount of months? Or that the insurgency was in its "death throes"? I mean, that was pretty standard fare for a while. And to be clear, I don't resent them saying it...I resent them having to say it just because too many Americans lack stomach and when it's damaged them politically now.

Perhaps you don't understand what links are. They are a way of proving what you claim by using a hyperlink to show people the article you are talking about.


Hyperlink:

(hpr-lngk) Computer Science
v. hy·per·linked, hy·per·link·ing, hy·per·links
v. tr. To make a hypertext link in (an electronic document or file).
254 cba  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:48:07pm

George guy #164:

Turn the crescent into a bow. The bowstring would be a narrow black tarmac path (or a dirt path), and it wouldn't be straight, it would be bent as if the string was being pulled back. And make a long line of flowers to form an arrow that is nocked in the bow. Make a big arrowhead out of some of that WTC wreckage, and engrave "Let's Roll" on it.

And leave it pointed at Mecca.

I love it.

255 LC LaWedgie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:49:21pm

#211 Rayra -

The ilk of the OpiMoby summed up by Big L:

Hi falutin' talk
256 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:49:26pm

#248 psginfinity

Naah, can't take that bet. Those odds are waaay too short for my taste...

LOL!

BTW: Asahi (clink)

Cheers!

257 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:50:34pm
258 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:52:51pm

#238 LesLein

I'm working it into my little broadside.

#249 hillbilly geek

Ya done good, my man!

259 cba  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:53:37pm

BTW, I also got an error message when I submitted my comment on the National Park Service site, so I clicked Back and submitted it again. Same problem. The comment might have been submitted OK, it could just be that the confirmation page was problematic.

Anyhow, I sent essentially the same comment to the Secretary of the Interior. Thanks, zombie, for all you do.

260 bonz  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:55:56pm

#238 LesLein
[Link: www.crwflags.com...]

261 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:56:46pm

There are three possibilities about the motivation behind the PA Memorial. they are a defiant symbolic appropriation, an honest mistake, and willful malice. More as I tap away...

The easiest to dismiss is the defiant symbol. I dismiss that because
A) there's nothing to suggest an angry patriot in his past or present,
B) there is no corresponding, overtly patriotic imagery, and
C) there's no corresponding defiant rhetoric from the Memorial Commission's camp.

An honest mistake could have been made. This would have been confirmed if he'd shown that he understood his error, and offered to correct it. Instead, however, he dug in his heels. That leaves two possibilites.

One, his ego may have gotten away from him and Two, premeditated malice.

The architect's statements might lead one to believe that his ego got away from him. Note his insistence that nothing was overtly meant by that. Also, note the condescending attitude of the Warhol Museum director. Egomaniacs have a real problem with admitting fault, or error. So he(they) may be trying to brazen it out.

However, I'm in the Premeditated Malice camp.

We've already been through NY Moonbats torpedoing a NY Firefighter's statue, on the grounds it wasn't 'racially inclusive'. We're in the middle of Moonbat's attempt to hijack Ground Zero itself. Their disdain for real Americana is well documented, in their own words no less. So, the precedent is there.

Architects have no excuse when symbolism blows up in their faces. Symbols are a vital part of their palette, and they tend to immerse themselves in that symbology to help with their project. Zombie helped bring the crescent to light, Etaoin Shrdlu discovered the orientation to Mecca, and LesLein pointed out the predominance of Muslim - specific color schemes.

Then there's my personal experience. I spent just enough time as an architecture student to know there is no way in Hell that's simply a string of coincidences. His replies could easily go the other way, and that's how I take them. Given the totality of evidence, I conclude this is a conscious slap in America's face.

262 greenmiler  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:58:25pm

that article digusts me..I miss you guys, but I was displaced by Katrina..lost my house..down in naples , Fl , trying to decide what to do. can't believe this article..time to drink..again

263 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 3:59:18pm

#246 OpininginDC

"Therefore, I AM questioning someone who uses religion to say that everyone who doesn't agree with them politically is also and must be a) bad and b) without faith."

Islam is choice c) wants you dead in the most horrible way possible

264 The Monster  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:01:54pm

Once again the double standard of the elites.

People in the South who fly the Confederate battle flag for various reasons are told that those reasons are not relevant, because 'it is a symbol of racism'. And who gets to define what it's a symbol of? Not the people who use the symbol, but those who claim to represent the victims of the racism.

So intellectual honesty would require that the claim of those who represent the victims of the 9/11 Islam(ofasc)ist terrorists, that a red crescent is symbolic of Islam(ofasc)ism. But the elites are having none of it. The Art Community's authority to do things like forcing Christians to pay taxes to support a depiction of a crucifix in urine trumps victim status.

Besides, the victims of 9/11 are mostly white Republicans, as certain race-pimping 'comedians' will tell you, so their victimhood isn't as 'authentic' as that of Black Folks (especially the ones Chimpy McBusHitlerBurtonRove is trying to kill with weather- and/or mind-control rays).

265 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:03:03pm

#262 greenmiller

What does not kill you makes you stronger. Stay stong. Just remember, you will have better days. There are alot of people praying for you.

266 greenmiler  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:06:48pm

thank you hous. was lucky to have family here.
lot better off than 90% of others. house and job gone hurts though. but WTF! we're alive!

267 lawhawk  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:07:13pm

zombie:

You're right that the design could be modified with little effort.

Heck, you could take the crescent and turn it into an infinity symbol - showing the American people and the American spirit will live on regardless of the acts of terrorist barbarians who seek to impose 7th Century Islam on the world.

Of course, pretty much any kind of alteration would improve matters.

Just as a matter of comparison, the original Freedom Tower design by Libeskind called for a latticework of steel tension cables above the 70th floor up to the top of the spire at 1,776 feet. The intermediate design was a torqued tower, that still maintained the height, but eliminated the lattice. The current design moves the location of the tower, turns the tower into a series of interlocking triangles that change the profile of the tower from a square at the base to an octagon at its peak, with it topping out at 1,776 feet.

Each one of those revisions was a significant improvement over the earlier designs. Part of the reason for those changes was public outcry. I expect to see the same thing happen here.

268 K.  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:07:16pm

252 Rayra

I find it particularly telling that the primary war banner of the Prophet [sbuh] was an all black flag, and that the Black Flag has symbolized the coming of Death Rack and Ruin ever since.

Ironically (or not?) what it connotes for me is pesticide spray :-D

269 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:08:18pm

I have an idea for an even more insensitive monument . . . how about a landing strip?

270 K.  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:10:01pm

zombie & lawhawk,

The only problem with accepting a design modification is that there are really two outrages here, and one of them is that the design process got hijacked by leftists & Islamist apologists. Changing the design doesn't address that.

I've emailed my Congressman asking for a new design commission, as well as the deep-sixing of the current design.

271 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:10:12pm

#253

Reaganite,

Oh, brother. Very well, if you insist:

The "death throes" comment:

[Link: www.cnn.com...]

Rumsfeld's "five days, five weeks, five months...no more than that" comment:

[Link: www.cbsnews.com...]

Cheney says, when asked about a protracted conflict, that "he doesn't think it will turn out that way."

[Link: www.mtholyoke.edu...]

Again, I don't mind what they said, I mind that they had to say it.

#246 hous bin pharteen

The discussion to which you refer was not about Islam. It was about Christianity. But thank you for stating the brutally obvious and part of why I support the war, although for my son and daughter more than myself...unlike Reganite, I won't insist on links to the obvious.

272 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:12:16pm

#266 greenmiller

I know it sounds like a cliche, but its also true. Had a fire in our apartment complex once, we lost a lot of stuff. But it was just stuff.

People can't be replaced.

Florida isnt a bad place to start over.
Employment is pretty good down there I hear.

273 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:15:14pm

Iron Fist:

Do you know Harold? Is he still living?

274 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:18:51pm

#271 OpininginDC
You obviously do not know where you are.
CNN, CBS, and some site called mtholyoke? Really, next you'll link to salon or Kos.

Anyway, from your first link:

The insurgency in Iraq is "in the last throes," Vice President Dick Cheney says, and he predicts that the fighting will end before the Bush administration leaves office.

From your second:

"The idea that it's going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990," he said on an Infinity Radio call-in program.

I won't even go to your third link.

Did you actually read you links?

Pathetic.

275 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:19:21pm
276 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:20:32pm

#210, #271 OpininginDC

You made the statement, and now have some links. One set doesn't seem to follow from the other. Would you please elaborate? (Something like my #261 post). Wrap it in a bow tie, and you might just win the argument...

277 greenmiler  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:20:44pm

hous
thanks, family here has been great. we'll make it. made a 'gas run' into the area a few days later to some friends; total devestation; 120 gallons of gas in back of pick-up for twelve hours was scary, but they we're grateful. economy is shot though. its not just houses wacked, so we're places of employment. they got a long road back.

278 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:25:29pm

#276 psginfinity

Wrap it in a bow tie, and you might just win the argument...

This clown thinks he's at IMC or something. Thinks we'll just roll over.

This is nothing more than a "clever" troll. It'll pop out the "Bush lied..." mantra any minute.

279 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:26:06pm
Then there's my personal experience. I spent just enough time as an architecture student to know there is no way in Hell that's simply a string of coincidences. His replies could easily go the other way, and that's how I take them. Given the totality of evidence, I conclude this is a conscious slap in America's face.

I don't think anything that is being juried, and explained in detail is "dismissing" it. I am sure the archect had very thorough reasons to design all of the imagery we see. Architects are pretty methodical as creative types go.

I am not going to be able to defend the architects imagery, the opinion is pretty solid, and a worthy debate.

This pretty uncomfortable debate, because I side with never mimiting free speech.. I just don't think it is what the fore fathers wanted.

Someone here made a comparasion of an Islamic crescent to a swastika. Another talking point was made about swastikas adorning a holocaust memorial.

Aside from generally being taken back, I remind you that Nazi symbols and imagery are illegal in Europe and not in America.

If the designer has done something in poor taste that's one thing...The only aspect of this debate I can take part in is defending his right to do so.

Many of the family members of the fallen seem to be okay with the piece, shouldn't their opinion matter?

One last query. If the artist decided to use the memorial site to design ant Islamic imagery, or something that offends Islam in order to dignify the dead passengers would you protest the too?

280 pskc2  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:29:04pm

In response to #72, I am one of the good people of Pennsylvania, and I swear that I will do whatever I can to physically intrude if this abomination ever sees the light of day.

It really is adding insult to injury.

--Bill



#72 Beldar 9/11/2005 02:54PM PDT
I would hope, if it comes down to it, the good people of Pennsylvania will physically intrude upon any effort to implement that abomination.
281 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:31:12pm

#279 Psyduck

Actually, I might object to anti-Islamic imagery. In my mind , the dignity of the passengers need not rest on giving a religion a Bronx Cheer. Besides, there's time for that later. Parenthetically, that's why we went to Iraq. Iraq will have a TON to do with whether this war is cotained at the terrorist level, or has to escalate...

282 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:35:05pm

#278 Reaganite

Sorry for the out-of-order post, but I was choing back laughter.

I'm in. He's gone BushLied by post #350...

BTW, Did I make any sense w/ #261?

283 jrdroll  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:37:54pm

#279

Many of the family members of the fallen seem to be okay with the piece, shouldn't their opinion matter?


No its a national not a personal monument.

If the artist decided to use the memorial site to design ant Islamic imagery, or something that offends Islam

Being a kuffar offends Islam. We'd all have to convert or die to not offend them.

284 abolitionist  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:40:17pm

#29 zombie

Listen up:
The final decision on this memorial has to be approved by The Secretary of the Interior, Gale Norton.

From Secretary of Interior Gale A. Norton bio:

Gale Norton, a lifelong conservationist, public servant and advocate for bringing common sense solutions to environmental policy, was sworn in as the 48th Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior in January 2001. The first woman to head the 153-year-old department, Norton has made what she calls the Four C's the cornerstone of her tenure: Consultation, Communication, and Cooperation, all in the service of Conservation.

I surely hope she'll be satisfied with just those four.
/just saying

285 lawhawk  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:43:12pm

Has anyone checked out Ace lately; he's updated his Flight 93 Memorial information to include this bit:

The crescent is designed to be perfectly in line with Mecca - to wit - According to the Qibla finder, which goes according to the shortest route (in this case, over the North Pole), the midpoint of the "Cresent of Embrace" points directly towards Mecca, if you imagine an arrow nocked in the "bow" of the crescent.

Ace has maps and everything. This seems to be a pretty concerted effort to link Islam, the crescent, and the Flight 93 event. Does it put a positive spin on the linkage or not. But it does point to willfulness over other possibilities.

286 LesLein  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:43:37pm

Oh, come on. The crescent shape is present in nature (the crescent moon), in design, even in food (the crescent roll). How absurd to object to this simple and tasteful rememberance! -- Comment at Huffington Post quoted by #103

Another one of my sources says that the crescent roll is related to Islam. After the Turks' seige of Vienna was lifted a local baker supposedly made a crescent roll to celebrate. (It's also claimed that the Turks left bags of coffee behind, starting another tradition.)

287 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:43:47pm

How 'bout they just plant grass, keep it mowed, and keep people off of it.

288 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:43:58pm

Samson and Delilah

Rev Gary... (cover: Grateful Dead)


If I had my way
If I had my way
If I had my way
I would tear this whole building down

Delilah was a woman, she was fine and fair
She had good looks - God knows - and coal black hair
Delilah she gained old Samson's mind
When first he saw this woman, she looked so fine

Delilah she climbed up on Samson's knee
Said tell me where your strength lies, if you please
Then she spoke so kind, she talked so fair
That Samson said, Delilah you cut off my hair
You can shave my head, cleanse my hand
My strength comes as natural as any other man

[chorus]

You read about Samson, all from his birth
He was the strongest man ever had lived on earth
One day while Samson was walking along
Looked down on the ground he saw an old jaw bone
Then he stretched out his arm and his chains broke like threads
And when he got to move, ten thousand were dead

[chorus]

Now Samson and the lion, they got in attack
And Samson he walked up on the lion's back
You read about this lion, he killed a man with his paw
Samson got hands up round the lion's jaw
He ripped that beast, killed it dead
And the bees made honey in the lion's head

289 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:44:23pm

#282 psginfinity

Sorry for the out-of-order post, but I was choking back laughter.

Hysterical, isn't it?

I'm in. He's gone BushLied by post #350...

325!

BTW, Did I make any sense w/ #261?

Yes, but I have the insight of my artist son on this one (Right Wing Animator), as an artist,my son tells me this guy knew exactly what he was designing. Knowing my son, I believe him!

Totaly OT: psg, do you know my spell checker tries to correct your nic to "skinflint"?

LOL, I'm not kidding!

290 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:45:33pm
so, you do admit it's a symbol of Islam?

Among literally millions of other things. I supppose the relevance of this how you interpret it in honor of the victim.

you did in fact liken the crescent to a swastika and that is pretty bold.

In my opinion what we fought on Sept. 11, 2001 was Global Terrorism, generated by Islamic fanatics.

If this crescent is viewed in your eyes to be some snyde jab at his political leanings, then have at it.

I am not going to look at it from that direction. As an artist or designer myself, it is a shape and one of the tools I have to communicate. I am sure the architect gave careful thought to this and he might even be putting this shape into the site for a spiritual reason. Who knows.

These kind of debates go on in art circles day in and day out. I can only attest to the idea that I call it censure, and I don't defend that.

I hope the people on the plane thought they were "defending their way of life" so that we can have these debates. I think the fact that we still have the freedoms like "urine cross" and defiling Islam means that we are better than the oppressive, and most certainly censored societies is why we are better.

291 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:46:14pm

so there.

292 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:46:39pm

How 'bout a big, red Hammer & Scycle made out o' trees.

293 psginfinity  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:48:41pm

#289 reaganite

Thanks for the thoughts! And as for skinflint, anyone who knows my spendthrift tendencies would ALSO be choking with laughter!

/ Would make a good Spendator
// Hangs head in shame...

294 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:50:30pm

How about a big, red, white and blue Steal Your Face made out o' honeysuckle, rose bushes, and blackberry vines.

295 PETN Sandwich  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:52:29pm

Oooh, Oooh, pickme, Teacher, pick me! [as i wave my arm fratically in the air...]

Instead of "Crescent of Embrace" why don't we call it "EMBRACE THE CRESCENT"? For that is what it is.

As family memebers of the 'Magnificent Nineteen' enter the Family Entrance of the Sacred Ground to pay their respects to the glorious shahid they will be embracing the crescent which orientates them in the Qibla. Coming from the dense woods to the SW, they will enter the open crescent of sacred ground facing qibla, at the star representing the five pilars of islam and the five daily prayers...


Fuck the architects and the moon demon which possessed them.


FWIW, despite their denial of of symbology and iconography, muslims are heavily fixated on these things, second only to the fen shui set. Any chance the possesed architects are certified fen shui designers?

296 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:56:34pm

#293 psginfinity

And as for skinflint, anyone who knows my spendthrift tendencies would ALSO be choking with laughter!

I was laughing when I read it!

I think I'm going to have to start putting all LGF nics through my spell checker!

297 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:57:08pm

How 'bout a water slide?

298 a.k.a. Will  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:57:08pm

OT: Already a mandatory evacuation for the Outer Banks of North Carolina. Some National Guard already present. Guess some government officials took note of the indecisiveness before Katrina.

299 Photios  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:57:32pm

#29 zombie
I am going to quote your post on my blog and will link to your site. Thanks for the great information.

+Photi

300 jrdroll  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:58:54pm

#290

As an artist or designer myself, it is a shape and one of the tools I have to communicate

So what's being communicated using a symbol for Islam in a memorial to people who were killed by Islamists?

301 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 4:59:33pm

#290 psyduck

huh. really don't get it, eh?

there are plenty of symbols that could be used. doesn't mean they all should be.

freedom is one thing...respect is something else...and higher in the grand scheme.

I have freedom to piss on whatever I want...that doesn't mean I should.

artistic freedom carries responsibility, and if the artiste's intent is to inflame, well then he/she must bear the repercussions.

/hmmm, repercussions...percussion...caps...

be careful where the repercussions lead.

I would never advocate vigilantism against anyone, no matter how justified it may seem in their eyes, but there are those who would.

they (vigilantes) should be prosecuted.

302 Lawrence Schmerel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:02:50pm

How about a gallows to hang O'sama bin Laden and every single person who has known his whereabouts for the past four years?

303 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:04:59pm

#274

reaganite,

So, you insist on links that you lack the decency to check? The Mt. Holyoke site, had you bothered, is nothing more than a TRANSCRIPT from an NBC broadcast. And I know exactly where I am...that's why I'm directing you to their quotes, not the reshaped after-effect of the reporters' BS.

And yes, they did say what you extracted...as well as the quotes that I mentioned. In both cases what I'm saying is that what they said has not been born out, that they had to say it at the time because too many Americans are too afraid of conflict, and having done so, they are left in an unnecessarily and unjustly weakened political state as a result. Or would you disagree that the left has not successfully exploited these quotes(among others) to the detriment of the administration's standing?

What I find pathetic is your lack of willingness to engage discussion, chooosing instead artificial attacks based on misleading assertions.

#276

PSGInfinity,

Those quotes, among others, now made famous by left-wing pundits and political tools, have damaged the administration.

[Link: www.pollingreport.com...]

In the time since those quotes were made, other justifications for the war...ones more legit but less politically palatable...were offered. In point of fact, they have discussed for some time.

For instance, Wolfowitz's thinking on this topic goes back to at least 1992:

[Link: www.defenselink.mil...]

My frustration is that so many Americans are afraid of the value of decisive action, and so eager to cherish every heartbeat regardless of whether that heart serves or harms humanity, that the more pleasant reasons and, frankly, ones meant to assuage the lowest in self-centered thinking ("how much will it cost", "how long will it last") were needed.

304 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:07:13pm

Lawrence Schmerel
Give it a rest will you?

305 auzerais  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:09:43pm

If people believe that there HAS to be some "islamic" symbols in the UA93 Memorial, how about this:

Instead of the "Red Crescent", replace it with hedges or other greenery spelling out the phrase, "LET'S ROLL!" -- in English and ARABIC!

306 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:10:45pm

#303 OpininginDC

What I find pathetic is your lack of willingness to engage discussion, chooosing instead artificial attacks based on misleading assertions.

I quoted from two of your links. The quotes discounted your "argument". As I said, did you actually read your own links?

Let's see, I quote you and they are "attacks".
I quote your links and now they're "artificial attacks"?

Your L³ "logic" has lost me.

307 big L  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:12:03pm

I wonder what the elevation would be like. Under American With Disabilities Act, it has to be accessible by wheelchair et al. tha would mean a fairly flat deesign with only a small amt of 'rise of land' per 'run of land'. Architects would know what that amount is. So the drawing shows the site is flat pretty much, or has been excavated flat.
In Penn, can you remove as much soil as you want or not. What about the 'Scythian earth beetle' or other protected species? Where is the parking or the toilets going to be.Is there going to be an interpretive center?
Will wind chimes disturb the feeding of the deer or other fauna. Is there water and power and roads near the site? Does it need to be plowed. Will the planting of trees such as described conflict with what is there naturally. Will the trees create a detrimental condition to neighboring owners, e.g: a wind-break that throws snow or drainage onto the adjacent property.Are there rules for placement that require good feng shui. Will it drain water across adjacent owner's land. Will the Native Americans sign off on this project or is this memorial being built on ancient trial burial grounds. Is this memorial 'active' or "passive" site.
I wonder if this site will end up having towers or view points set up and slipped in so that the Crescent of Embrace cam be seen by the public.

308 TalkinKamel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:12:45pm

#279 psyduck

The "Someone here" who supposedly compared the crescent to the swastika was me. What I actually said, was that I thought building a memorial to Flight 93 in the form of the Islamic crescent was as tasteless as putting a swastika on a memorial to the victims of the Holocaust.

And, again, if you're going to write that off as simply comparing-the-crescent-to-the-swastika, if you really can't see why it's wrong to memorialize victims under the emblems of those who murdered, and wanted to oppress them---and why some people might find that offensive, and disturbing---you never will.

309 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:16:15pm

#306 reaganite

" What I find pathetic is your lack of willingness to engage discussion, chooosing instead artificial attacks based on misleading assertions.

I quoted from two of your links. The quotes discounted your "argument". As I said, did you actually read your own links?

Let's see, I quote you and they are "attacks".
I quote your links and now they're "artificial attacks"?

Your L³ "logic" has lost em.

shame on you for thinking that LLL somehow relates to logic. You know better.

310 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:17:27pm

I believe that offensive combat operations in Iraq lasted about 5 weeks after the kickoff. The story of the Russian column evacuating through Syria and almost getting into it with US forces at that approx' 5 week mark has never really been followed up in the press. Since that time (the end of the 5 weeks) Iraq has come a long way. From occupation, insurgency, election of representatives, formulation of a Constitution, and soon another election. In the meantime, all Saddams military bases are now American Bases and our presense insures the security of the economies of of all of the continents except Antarctica. This is not a F'in game, even though the left and the media treat it that way.

311 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:17:29pm

#308 Talkin Kamel

he/she never will.

312 K.  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:17:36pm

I wonder how much tuition psyduck paid . . .

psyduck, you were ripped off.

313 abolitionist  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:19:34pm

#164 George Guy

I have an easy solution: Turn the crescent into a bow. ...
And leave it pointed at Mecca.

Yeah, and we could insist that it's Cupid's Arrow. Feel the Love.

314 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:19:49pm

#309 mongoose

shame on you for thinking that LLL somehow relates to logic. You know better.

LOL, well I did use scare quotes around "logic"!

315 TalkinKamel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:21:25pm

psyduck

Also, there is the question that jdroll raises in Post #300---what exactly is being communicated here, using this imagery, and is it for a memorial to those who died on Flight 93?

Also, artists have freedom of speech, but this is a public memorial, on public land, being paid for with (as I understand, at least partially), our tax dollars. If this were something they were doing in their own studio, on their own dime, and being exhibited in a private gallery---fine! Those who disliked it could just sneer at it, and leave it alone. Unfortunately, this is a public work of art, supposedly honoring fallen Americans.

316 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:23:00pm
huh. really don't get it, eh?

Of course I get it.

you think this artist is merely some shock artist who has conspired to put an Islamic crescent on the bodies of dead Americans.

...

I like the artists work, I love the ideas of sustainable design, and aside from the way the images in the space can be "interpreted" if we were to see what the archtect's thoughts were we might be surprised.

I don't think an architect would be as malicious as to compete in a juried competition, slave away on this monument with the EXPLICIT intent to poke at George Bush, and red statesmen. I certainly don't believe that this work was done in an attempt stick a finger straight up the ass of the victims.

Besides, the symbol is only red for one season. If we are going to play games with semantics he could just as easily say that the dying leaves symbolize America's eternal struggle with Islamofacism and people would buy it...

Lighten up. I am sure this guy is so self absorbed doesn't even participate in politics, and probably doesn't even have a political leaning.

317 nellodee  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:24:07pm

from another architect:

I will further surmise that Paul Murdoch's commitment to sustainable design is a sign of his inclination towards the left of center, compounded by the fact that he works, and probably lives in the one of the “bluest” sections of California. Understanding this, it becomes even more likely that the appearance of this crescent in the Flight 93 Memorial design was intentional based on socio-political inclinations of the design. Being an architectural designer by trade, I knowing how the process of design works, and the implications of it. As architects, we are responsible for every single line (or arc) we draw--not only from a legal standpoint. A crescent shape, created out of Red Maple (Acer rubrum) trees that turn bright red in the fall, forming the red Islamic crescent, effectively during the season in which 9/11 occurred. Accident? No. Ideally speaking, everything is intentional with design. Plantings are not picked at random, this specific species was chosen for its color; perhaps even its timing.


From Paul's excellent link

and, IF, two lines would be good tonight. lol.

318 TalkinKamel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:26:10pm

#311 mongoose

You're right (sigh.) He/she never will, and. . .

#312 k.

He/she certainly was! (Ripped off, that is.)

319 gymnast  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:27:21pm

#316, Psyduck. Is that the heuristic model you use for all you suppositions and conclusions?

320 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:27:32pm

#316 Psyduck

Lighten up. I am sure this guy is so self absorbed doesn't even participate in politics, and probably doesn't even have a political leaning.

Artists deal in symbolism. This crescent is pointed toward Mecca, is named “Crescent of Embrace”, it's red. The jury that selected it knew it would be controversial and you think it was an accident?

Moron.

321 K.  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:27:47pm

GAZE

322 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:27:53pm

#315 Kamel

it's not the first time that tax dollars have been used to promote/support ideologies that are not in mainstream America's approved list. Not by far.

That doesn't make it right.

I am not sure what we, as taxpayers, can do about this perversive appropriation of our money, but I sure would like to know.

aside from voting the bastards out, which doesn't seem to happen.

/scuse me while i puke

323 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:31:31pm

#316 psyduck

"Of course I get it."

nope. you don't.

effete jerk. full of symbolism that even you don't understand.

laughable.

too bad we have to pay for this bullshit.

324 nellodee  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:32:27pm

Also, in the same article, Paul Murdoch has stated he would change the name, but not the design. That is believeable to me. I have les artistes in my own family, and they would never change a particle of a design they felt expressed "true meaning". They become invested in it.

325 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:34:32pm
And, again, if you're going to write that off as simply comparing-the-crescent-to-the-swastika, if you really can't see why it's wrong to memorialize victims under the emblems of those who murdered, and wanted to oppress them---and why some people might find that offensive, and disturbing---you never will.

I apologize talking kamel, tha pace of this blog is lightning fast.

No, I am actually more interested in the juxtaposition of the two, than I am shocked someone would make the association.

Well, the more I look at the piece I would like to comparatively know how many degrees out of the full circle he has uesd. As Charles pointed out in the article the people involved aer aware of the perception of the image.

Now putting those two facts together I ASSUME that the architect has some pretty thorough reasoning behind what has been done. And it probably doesn't have anything to do with Islam more than the shape.

I am no expert, but don't hardline Muslims strictly prohibit idolization and symbols? I have read that Mecca is falling apart because of this Wahabbi Islam?

So wouldn't this also offend Islam?

Just curios about that, I don't know too much about Islam so I am sure someone here can dial that one in.

326 nellodee  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:35:23pm

Umm, psyduck, do you still believe this?

Lighten up. I am sure this guy is so self absorbed doesn't even participate in politics, and probably doesn't even have a political leaning.
327 montanapatriot  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:37:07pm

#32 Moonbat One

Got matches ?

328 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:38:13pm

#325 Psyduck

I am no expert, but don't hardline Muslims strictly prohibit idolization and symbols?

What do you call the flags of islamic nations? Idiot.

329 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:38:25pm

#324 nellodee

using the Fwench term "les artistes" pretty much says it all.

330 PETN Sandwich  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:39:20pm

#73 Paul,

Good link but heis refussing referrals from LGF.

Need to right click and copy link address, then past ina new windoe.

331 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:40:43pm

dogpile on the psyduck! dogpile on the psyduck!

hasn't got a chance on LGF.

good.

332 TalkinKamel  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:41:59pm

#316 psyduck

"Lighten up. I am sure this guy is so self absorbed doesn't even participate in politics, and probably doesn't even have a political leaning."

Do you know the architect personally? If not, what makes you so sure of this? Modern artists are notorious for having strong political views, and for inflicting these views on their audiences; what makes you so sure this guy isn't like that?

I think psginfinity sums it up pretty well in Post #260; as infinity says, given the evidence we have, about the only two reasonable conclusions we can draw at this point are:

1. It's his ego, he's too stubborn to admit he's wrong, or. . .

2. It was premeditated malice.

The explanation that he didn't understand the symbolism, etc., just won't wash; symbolism is an architect's stock-in-trade. And don't tell me that artists can't be egotistical! As for malice, with works such as "Piss Christ" and the like, shocking the middle-class, seems to be the driving force behind a lot of "art" produced these days---the more shocking, the better! He might be seeking approval from his peers in the art world, not the lowly American masses. Or, as I said on the other thread, he might have had some silly idea that using the Moslem symbolism would spark "dialogue."

Whatever his reason, this is not a good monument for Flight 93. It should either be changed, or scraped.

333 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:42:32pm

#306

Reaganite,

How does the quote that you chose...

""The idea that it's going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990," he said on an Infinity Radio call-in program.

...In any way work against my point that the administration was pitching a short war? How does Rumsfeld assuring us that 1990 suggested it would be a brief conflict work against my point that the administration was having to posture about a brief, inexpensive war?

And if you're confused about the word belied or something, why not read the link thoroughly. The first three paragraphs:

***

There will be no World War III starting with Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld declared Thursday, and rejected concerns that a war would be a quagmire.

"The idea that it's going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990," he said on an Infinity Radio call-in program.

He said the U.S. military is stronger than it was during the Persian Gulf War, while Iraq's armed forces are weaker.

"Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that," he said. "It won't be a World War III."

***

You think he's trying to suggest we'd be there a while?!? Maybe it's no wonder you have a hard time following logic.

And again, so someone doesn't turn this into a different discussion, my whole point is not that I resent the administration saying those things...I resent that they felt they had to say them when there were far better reasons for the war already on the table.

334 Friend of Bill W  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:45:34pm

Site is down (as I'm sure due to massive traffic after the airing of Discovery's program tonight).

They asked for donations to the National Memorial being planned in Shanksville.

People, we must overwhelm them with e-mails conveying to them our strongest desire to give, as well as our complete refusal to do so until the "Crescent" design is rejected.

Memorial site

335 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:45:51pm

#310

This is not a F'in game, even though the left and the media treat it that way.

Gymnast,

I couldn't agree more.

336 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:46:27pm

#332 Talkin Kamel

well put!

337 reader  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:47:46pm

In what Muslim country can a cross be displayed outside a church building? I'm guessing at virtually none in the Middle East, yet crescents can sit atop the domes of every mosque. Did any of you involved in designing this memorial catch what I'm saying? I'm talking about something that goes far beyond mere symbolism. This about freedom, and having a way to honor those on this flight who gave up their lives fighting to preserve it.

338 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:48:05pm

eloquence is not my forte...but I can certainly bash. with the power of the righteous, LOL.

and, I do like sarcasm.

339 mglazer  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:49:50pm
340 PETN Sandwich  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:49:52pm

#209 bluemerle

Please run the qibla tail to the families entrance to the dacredground / star.

BTW, I think the qibla projections area a bit off. Note the short straight road to the family entrance.

341 mattm  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:52:16pm

#9

How does it happen that America hating leftists seem always to be in charge of memorials to people that they hate?

But being libs they are smarter than every uone else. For example, they know that ants have feeings like us. And libs know that it would be wrong to create a memorial that "honors" the victims, Americans, and not the real victims, the arabs bacause of the Bush admin.

342 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:52:48pm

#333 OpininginDC

How does the quote that you chose...

Do you really think that people can't scroll up? The quote was:

The insurgency in Iraq is "in the last throes," Vice President Dick Cheney says, and he predicts that the fighting will end before the Bush administration leaves office.

FYI, Bush is still in office.

...In any way work against my point that the administration was pitching a short war?

We've been in Iraq for a year and a half. By any stretch, that's short war.

Can you really be that stupid?

You think he's trying to suggest we'd be there a while?!? Maybe it's no wonder you have a hard time following logic.

Umm, President Bush said it was not going to be a short war.

I resent that they felt they had to say them when there were far better reasons for the war already on the table.

Come on, you want to say it moby, "Bush lied".

343 Baldy  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:53:51pm

I will NEVER be happy with this monstrosity.

344 Jakester  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:54:20pm

Time to sharpen my trusty axe!

345 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:56:21pm

sniff, sniff

methinks trolls are present, be they in disguise...

346 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:57:00pm

LOL Jake!

/great minds, etc

347 mglazer  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:57:08pm
348 The Bruce  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 5:58:56pm

Emailed a letter to Sec. Norton this evening about the Crescent Menace. My contribution to what I hope will be an outpouring of dissent to this attempt at sedition.

349 Etaoin Shrdlu  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:00:52pm

Politicalities has carefully measured the crescent using the best available view on the Flight 93 Memorial Project site and confirms it's less than 2/3 of one degree off the qibla.

350 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:02:12pm
Whatever his reason, this is not a good monument for Flight 93. It should either be changed, or scraped.

According to you, but I disagree.

You have excellent talking points, and I read this blog because the readers here are highly intelligent IMO, but I simply disagree. I'm surprised that I haven't achieved trolldom in the debate already?!

you guys are getting all soft on me!

Like I said in the other post I promise you on my list of things to do tommorrow I will go down to the architects studio, or at least call.

I am curious about how this is intended to be interpreted myself. As for the scrape, or dump, I believe that the only people who can legitimately call for the removal of the image are the families of the victims.

I know it is a ntional park, but the individual passengers are the people being memorialized. Personally, I believe that any other intervention from the outside runs the risk of politicizing the issue. But, that probably the intent.


I have to go TK, if you have a valid email address I might be able to get some answers this week.


I hope the architect can dispell these rumors, and put the issue to bed.

351 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:03:46pm

#350 psyduck

" I'm surprised that I haven't achieved trolldom in the debate already?!"

you have.

352 Friend of Bill W  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:04:50pm

I'm serious.

I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore.
In the words of our President's father...

THIS WILL NOT STAND

This design must be stopped.

Period.

To the point of direct social action and guerilla disruption of construction efforts, should it come to that...
I hope that it should not have to go that far...

Inundate them.


Memorial Commission

Swamp them.

(The site is currently down, but copy the url: [Link: www.honorflight93.org...]

Bury them.

Shout from anywhere we can about this obscenity, this monstrosity of a plan.

Stun them with the passion of our response.

They were requesting donations after the Discovery program this evening.

353 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:05:08pm
354 mglazer  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:05:58pm

[Link: shopping.discovery.com...]

100% of the purchase price of this DVD will be donated to the Flight 93 National Memorial Project. For more information, visit [Link: www.honorflight93.org...]

It took the terrorists on Flight 93 two years to plan their attack. It took the 40 strangers aboard 30 minutes to defeat it.

355 z9z99  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:06:50pm

Some brief thoughts:

1.) The comments from the representative from CAIR are instructive.

But Rabiah Ahmed, a spokeswoman with the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington, D.C., said there is no one official symbol associated with Islam...People forget Muslims died [in the attacks], too," Ahmed said. "Islam, as a religion itself, was hijacked on 9/11."

Maybe we should come up with somethng that commemorates the hijacking of Islam. That wouldn't be controversial would it? How about a sculpture depicting Muhammad Atta wiping his backside with the Koran? Or a painting of Osama Bin Laden wearing a G-string on the Haj, while eating pork-rinds? Would it be within the purview of the artist to "express" the spiritual consequences of the act (the one that "hijacked Islam") by showing Ahmed al-Nami and Ziad Jarrah as Betty Friedan's slaves in the afterlife?

2.) Psyduck instructs us that he is "sure the archect had very thorough reasons to design all of the imagery we see," and that is undoubtably true. But this raises the entirely reasonable question, if the designers were trying to convey something that "has nothing to do with Islam," have they failed miserably because many people seem to interpret the design as having lots to do with Islam? Should the designers worry that their message has been drowned out by the natural interpretation of the unwashed? Should we expect our designers to be a little more articulate in their work? After all, Mr. Murdoch instructs us that crescents are part of the "architectural vocabulary." What's the point of having a vocabulary if it doesn't convey what is intended? In short, if the designers had meant to commemorate the heroes of Flight 93, but instead ignited a debate about the appropriateness of religious symbolism, then the heroes get shorted. Come up with a design that emphasizes the heroes, not religious controversy or the aesthetic sensibilities of a self-important elite.

3.) Aren't there any designers out there that can produce a memorial that "means" that precious human lives were cut short and that decent people died doing heroic things, without injecting political twaddle and metaphysical horseshit?

356 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:09:48pm

#353 Rayra
Go ahead, banish the troll. I lost the bet with psginfinity. The troll still hasn't screamed "Bush lied" yet.

357 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:11:24pm
358 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:12:27pm

#355 z9z99

3)

of course there are. but they won't get funded by Fed dollars. and if they're funded by the "radical Christian Right-wing Nutcases",
they'll be declared "unconstitional" after numerous lucrative lawsuits. this is our country today.

/sadness

359 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:13:20pm
360 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:14:06pm

PIMF

unconstitional= unconstitutional

361 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:16:29pm
362 Baldy  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:17:18pm

Email/Fax/call Rush Limbaugh He has what, 20 million listeners? The MSM does not see this as a big controversy, even though the AP picked up the story.

363 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:17:42pm

#359 Rayra

DRINK, mofos!

I'm afraid! American Infidel, Foreign Devil, Vickie, and Maine's Michael will call me an alcoholic!

Ohh what the hell, Cheers!

364 locutus  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:17:44pm

I hate September.

September was when summer vacation ended, and another miserable year of public school began.
World War II started on September 1st, 1939, with my poor distant relatives in Poland fighting a 20th century killing machine with a 19th century army, the start of (to date) the most costly war in human history...our beloved German Shepard died on September 10th, 2002, and my parents Beagle died one week later.
My poor little home state of Rhode Island was smashed to splinters on September 21st, 1938 by a hurricane that remains nameless. Funny, nobody blamed the 600 dead on President Roosevelt's inept response to the disaster, but that's a story for another thread.

I hate September, and I always will.

Today started with the brothers and sisters of NYC 9/11 victims reading the names of the dead, which just ripped my heart out..

..but kudos to Fox News for having the courage to replay the footage of the actual attacks as they happened..I flipped around, but didn't notice PMSNBC or the Crescent News Network replaying any of that footage this morning. I guess they don't want to offend anyone, since Islam is a religion of peace and stuff.

Tonight, watching the Flight 93 documentary on Discovery Channel turned today's sadness to anger all over again. I'm thinking of what Whittle wrote last week, "if only I was there...I could have landed the plane.."

Never forget...never forgive, either, my friends. Keep your eyes open for the next Mohammed Atta, but also watch for his willing accomplices on the American Left, because that is where the next knife blade is coming from.

365 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:18:00pm

Rayra, as usual, so diplomatic, not to mention subtle...

LOL, gotta like it!

366 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:19:40pm

z9z99

2.) Psyduck instructs us that he is "sure the archect had very thorough reasons to design all of the imagery we see," and that is undoubtably true. But this raises the entirely reasonable question, if the designers were trying to convey something that "has nothing to do with Islam," have they failed miserably because many people seem to interpret the design as having lots to do with Islam? Should the designers worry that their message has been drowned out by the natural interpretation of the unwashed? Should we expect our designers to be a little more articulate in their work? After all, Mr. Murdoch instructs us that crescents are part of the "architectural vocabulary." What's the point of having a vocabulary if it doesn't convey what is intended? In short, if the designers had meant to commemorate the heroes of Flight 93, but instead ignited a debate about the appropriateness of religious symbolism, then the heroes get shorted. Come up with a design that emphasizes the heroes, not religious controversy or the aesthetic sensibilities of a self-important elite.

I wanted to go but I couldn't pass this one up. Charles is sort of like an artist in his own right. He runs this site, designs the graphics, and posts his content (albeit a little bit of schtick along with the news).

People that disagree with his views on Islam regularly come here and call for his censure. Charles' opinions can be supported or denied, but is CAIR comes knocking on his door tommorrow, and ban's him from the internet bacause they are offended do you support that?

Do you see how the train of thought can go horribly wrong? I am at odds with the thought process, not defending the imagery.

Come up with a design that emphasizes the heroes, not religious controversy or the aesthetic sensibilities of a self-important elite.

in other words, don't do work that you design, do the work that "say is okay for you to design."

This was atempted before with the Viet Nam memorial along the same lines, and I know which one the vets got. It isn't the politically correct, figurative version.

367 PETN Sandwich  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:21:20pm

#325 Psyduck

Please do not be willfully ignorant(i.e.: stupid).

Dogpile "star crescent symbology" and you get
this. Oh, and a few fatwas saying there is no symbology in islam. Go figure.

368 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:21:53pm
369 Friend of Bill W  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:25:50pm

I got through to the url that I was referred to because the site is currently down.

It's the National Park's website.

My message:

I would be delighted and honored to donate to the planned memorial to the innocent victims of Flight 93. However, it is my opinion that the current design pays homage to the guilty.
I urge you to reconsider this design.
Please let me know how I may influence the change of the design and, as a result, can then proudly contribute to this memorial.
Thank-you for considering my opinion.

370 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:27:21pm
371 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:27:55pm

I hate to respond to such an obvious trolling post, but,

"Do you see how the train of thought can go horribly wrong? I am at odds with the thought process, not defending the imagery.

Come up with a design that emphasizes the heroes, not religious controversy or the aesthetic sensibilities of a self-important elite.

in other words, don't do work that you design, do the work that "say is okay for you to design."

This was atempted before with the Viet Nam memorial along the same lines, and I know which one the vets got. It isn't the politically correct, figurative version."


Of course we see that. Lizards are far from advocating censorship, we just don't think it's appropriate to honor fallen heroes with a symbol of the people who caused them to fall. DUH. Is that so hard to understand? Why is it that one (you) would advocate this particular piece of "art" over the inumerable other forms that are surely out there, and being proposed?

a little suspect.

/done with trolls now, and feeling a little sick

372 Grandma  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:28:42pm

In 1964, in JACOBELLIS v. OHIO, 378 U.S. 184 (1964), Justice Potter Stewart tried to explain "hard-core" pornography, or what is obscene, by saying, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced . . . but I know it when I see it . . .

I would say the same about the design of the Flight 93 memorial design. As much as those “artists” who would say that the design, it’s placement and the message it conveys (considering the last words from the Flight 93 hijackers was of them screaming Allahu Ackbar) are "benign" and have nothing to do with the symbolism of the hatred embodied in Islam are liars.

After having watched tonight’s Discovery Channel documentary on Flight 93, the design by Paul Murdoch Architects in my opinion is obscene. And like Justice Stewart, I know it when I see it.

373 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:29:44pm

PETN

Well, the gauntlet is thrown. You guys are going to flood this with attention and the architect might respond.

I am seeking my information, but I just think that the depth of thought in this work is going to be astounding and he will be on his A game.

So shapen the darts and I'll watch the clock to see how comes out on the other side.

Rayra

Since insulting is what you do best I have one too. When I see your nic, I quickly put my scroll finger back to work.

374 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:31:12pm

#342

Reaganite,

"Come on, you want to say it moby, "Bush lied"."

Well, thank you for finally admitting your preconceptions, expectations, and hopes...Makes your agenda perfectly clear.

And to respond...No, I don't, and I haven't. What I want to say, have said, but you seem to refuse to hear 'cause you'd rather be a prick, I guess, is that too many Americans are whimps who can't accept how hard you have to be in the world sometimes.

Now then...

From your post:

"Do you really think that people can't scroll up? The quote was:

The insurgency in Iraq is "in the last throes," Vice President Dick Cheney says, and he predicts that the fighting will end before the Bush administration leaves office.
FYI, Bush is still in office.

...In any way work against my point that the administration was pitching a short war?
We've been in Iraq for a year and a half. By any stretch, that's short war.

Can you really be that stupid?"

Then why the comparison to the 1990 Gulf War? Why Rumsfeld's assertions of five months as the upper limit of the conflict's duration? ...or did you forget that quote already?

And except perhaps for you, I actually think most people are reading pretty thoroughly.

So, no, I'm not.

Let me ask you this, though:

Are you really so stupid that you can't tell the difference between a soundbyte and the rest of a statement? "Last throes"? What part do you expect people to pick up? And even if your light does burn that low, do you suppose that the Bush Administration, and that a man of Cheney's experience in government doesn't know a soundbyte when they say it?

Are you also so thick that the only thing that matters to you is the part of this interview that makes you feel better? For instance, what about this part of the interview:

"The level of activity that we see today from a military standpoint, I think, will clearly decline." (a quote from Cheney, a mere sentence from the more famous 'last throes' line). Now, that's a pretty bold statement when the insurgency had been so resourceful so far...I'd say clearly meant for political, rather than factual, consumption. And then less than two months later the administration deals with this:

[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]

where I refer you to paragraph 3:

Terrorist incidents in Iraq also dramatically increased, from 22 attacks to 198, or nine times the previous year's total.

Oops.

And even if that was a total shock to the Cheney (which I'd have to doubt), it's not like the administration doesn't know that we need to respond to other things going on there which will counter all those promises of an inexpensive war (not that there is such a thing to begin with):

[Link: www.cnn.com...]

No, I don't think Cheney was lying, but that's irrelevant to my point. Which, again, is that he did open the administration up to criticism in order to satiate and assuage unrealistic expectations domestically.

Another bit of Middle-School Debate Club work on your part:

"You think he's trying to suggest we'd be there a while?!? Maybe it's no wonder you have a hard time following logic.
Umm, President Bush said it was not going to be a short war."

So, let me get this right...your logic is, Cheney & Rumsfeld talk about a short war, but Bush didn't, so that somehow cancels out Cheney & Rumsfelds' statements to the press? Is that what you're saying? In what media environment?

This isn't about any one member of the administration...It's about the tact the administration as a whole was forced to take that, but for fearful and selfish citizens, was not necessary.

375 Friend of Bill W  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:31:52pm

Cheers Reaganite...have one for me.

I don't anymore.

Thanks for your gracious return e-mail
376 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:34:15pm

#370 Rayra

Better that, than 'Cranky Pants'.

How the hell is my keyboard ever going to dry out when you post shit like that?

377 z9z99  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:36:31pm

#366 Psyduck

I wasn't aware that the federal government paid for Charles' site. I have a hard time following your train of thought, because it seems to consist only of assumptions. Let me state one of my assumptions for you so we don't end up talking past one another:

The purpose of constructing a memorial is to honor those memorialized. It is not to provide a forum for the expression of the pet views of the designer. Mr. Murdoch has no entitlement to any subsidy for this work, and if the responsible agency does not want to fund it, that is not censorship. Mr. Murdoch is perfectly free to construct his crescents on his own property and at his own expense. He can splash them across city buses if he wants. No one is going to arrest him for his "work." As you well know, the first amendment proptects agains governmental restriction of speech, it does not guarantee gevernmental subsidy of it.

378 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:38:34pm

#374 OPining

your misuse of "tact" for "tack" shows your ignorance and negates your entire argument.

LOL @ you.

/GWB HS Debate club

379 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:40:27pm

#374 OpininginDC

And to respond...No, I don't, and I haven't. What I want to say, have said, but you seem to refuse to hear 'cause you'd rather be a prick, I guess, is that too many Americans are whimps who can't accept how hard you have to be in the world sometimes.

I notice that instead of answering what I posted, you make shit up.

You posted comments which I quoted, you claimed I attacked you.

I then quoted your links, which you said I "artificially attacked" you.

Then you misquoted me and now are claiming I said things I didn't.

Really, this isn't IMC or DU. Your words are here for everyone to see.

Pathetic.

380 karmic_inquisitor  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:41:44pm

#29 Zombie -

I am very late to this thread, but there is a Constitutional issue with displaying religious symbols on public property.

Thing is, the land isn't public property - it was donated to "The Conservation Fund." From their website there is this:

The Conservation Fund, on behalf of the National Park Service, is working with local partners to acquire and preserve the hallowed ground near Shanksville, PA where Flight 93 went down more than two years ago. The national nonprofit is in final negotiations with several willing landowners and expects to reach an agreement on properties both at the impact site and in the viewshed in the next few months.

“Preserving the hallowed ground of Flight 93 is of profound national importance. This memorial provides a meaningful way to honor those who sacrificed their lives on September 11th and give a respectful setting for family members and other visitors to commemorate this critical moment in American history,” said Fran Mainella, director of the National Park Service.

So the land is technically on private property, but this is all being done - explicitly - "on behalf of the National Park Service".

Here in San Diego we a have a war memorial which is in the shape of a cross on a hill top in La Jolla. Several organizations have successfuly sued the city to have the memorial torn down because it is an offensive religious symbol. The city has tried to donate the memorial to a variety of organizations, but the courts have said that isn't enough. Last I heard they were trying to hand it over to the Federal govt as a national war memorial in hopes that will save it.

Point is, this memorial is every bit as much an offensive religious symbol as a WW2 war memorial in the shape of a cross is. Anyone who is offended has a right to sue for protection from having such a symbol on public land.

381 reaganite  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:42:15pm

#375 Friend of Bill W

Cheers Reaganite

Cheers.

382 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:43:40pm

#316

Sorry, still gotta go with the burning cross at the MLK memorial. That will hit a LLL in the forehead like a 2x4 everytime.

The swastika/jew thing they dont get. Since most support the pali o' stinians anyway. And remember. The LLL still think it was the jooos who caused 9/11 anyway.

383 Gringo  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:43:45pm

She acknowledges that the crescent has come to represent the religion. But, she continued, it does not hold the same significance, for example, as the cross does to Christianity.

Excuse Me? What the hell kind of a dumbass statement is that? It doesn't?!

"People forget Muslims died [in the attacks], too," Ahmed said. "Islam, as a religion itself, was hijacked on 9/11."

muslims died? You mean as in "terrorist" muslims? And we should consider this a memorial to them also?

Not for one minute do I believe that the crescent in this memorial as designed by the dhimni architectural firm is a coincidence. The fit is too perfect to be anything but planned that way.

384 Psyduck  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:46:06pm
I wasn't aware that the federal government paid for Charles' site. I have a hard time following your train of thought, because it seems to consist only of assumptions. Let me state one of my assumptions for you so we don't end up talking past one another:

That isn't the point and you know it... But inside of this ya got me

The purpose of constructing a memorial is to honor those memorialized. It is not to provide a forum for the expression of the pet views of the designer. Mr. Murdoch has no entitlement to any subsidy for this work, and if the responsible agency does not want to fund it, that is not censorship.

He successfully did that. The panel of people whom you also pay your tax dollars to employ made what they felt is an appropriate decision.

You're only really debating at this point the definition of "right" and appropriate according to you.

Please try to see where I am coming from...This is YOUR interpretation of the piece and YOUR definition of respectfully honoring the dead.

He has his perspective and federal approval, so I don't think this will be an issue.

385 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:46:15pm

Uhm, yes Alex.

I would like to buy a clue please.

386 Gringo  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:46:35pm

The families of the people who died on this flight have no problem with the design? I hate to say it, but I think we're dealing with some moonbats here that have no clue whatsoever. How in God's name can they have no problem with a memorial that uses a muslim crescent in the design?

387 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:49:43pm

#383 Gringo

You mean you haven't see the King Herod Memorial to Jesus?

Or the Pharoah's Memorial to the Baby Jesus?

Or Judas's tribute to Jesus of Nazareth?

On a par with the Pali's memorial to the Tablets of the Ten Commandments, believe me!

388 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:49:48pm

#384 Psyduck

No, we are going to point out to those that really didnt pay attention to it what a completely frickin idoitic and insulting idea this was.

And then it will be changed.

And answer my question.

You got a problem with a flaming cross at the MLK memorial as long as it was justified with alot of mumbo jumbo and feel good gobbly gook talk?

389 abolitionist  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:52:44pm

#285 lawhawk

...(in this case, over the North Pole)...

Nope. Look again.

390 locutus  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:53:34pm

I propose that a future memorial to the victims of Hurricane Katrina be built as follows:

A bronze statue of Mayor Nagin, with his head firmly up his a**, standing on top of an empty, flooded school bus.

Does anyone find this offensive?

391 z9z99  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:57:22pm

#384 Psyduck,

Please try to see where I am coming from...This is YOUR interpretation of the piece and YOUR definition of respectfully honoring the dead.

Actually, this is wrong. If it were only me, there wouldn't be a thread about it here and stories about it in the Associated Press.

Even if it were only about MY interpretation, how is that any skin off your nose? Do we agree that there is no issue of censorship here? No one is suggesting that Mr. Murdoch be prevented by force from constructing his memorial. The only question is, given that public funds will be spent on it, is it an appropriate design? And appropriate to who? Well, to people like me and other people that think (in constitutionally protected opinions) that the shape of the memorial creates a distraction and is a little weird, given that Muslim murderers perpetrated an atrocity on the site.

392 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 6:57:34pm

appropriate, if offensive

393 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:02:51pm

My 14 year old son watched the Flight 93 show tonight. Asked me if we could visit the site when its done. I told him about the design and let him take a peak.

He asked what kind of idiot would do that?
Didnt they think any one would notice?

Well, aparently they didnt. Boy were they wrong.

Oh, and he suggested cutting the trees down himself. I was so proud!

394 Friend of Bill W  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:03:22pm

@ # 392 mongoose

appropriate, if offensive

as in : Fake but True.

nice.

395 dr. pangloss  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:03:39pm

go and inspect paul murdoch's proposal for wtc memorial at
[Link: www.wtcsitememorial.org...]

he proposes a " hall of contemplation and celebration"
what is there to celebrate in the brutal murder of 3000 Americans?

he also proposes to have a "liberty wall" where "each country of the world" donates a stone native to it with a prayer inscribed in that country's language. each country...means iran, syria, saudia arabia would be entitled to have representation there with a quote in arabic from the qu'ran!

396 mongoose  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:03:44pm

got no more time to deal with this crap, lizards...sorry...running low on sarcasm...


nite all.

397 PETN Sandwich  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:09:15pm

#373 Psyduck

Actually, for shits and grins I may file a formal ethics complaint with the Cal State board of engineers and architects - the designer made a proposal to honor the victims and nation of a religiously motivated (and biased) mass murder and he either chose to embed the offenders symbology in a monumental fsahion or did it by incompetance, when he was confronted by it, he refused to withdraw.

In either case he damned himself.

BTW, checked out his webpage, very mickey mouse affairs, lucky he got this far, and if he should ever loose his license he can always pretend to be an artiste. He'll probably make more money from Soros or Moore in a year than he ever made before, or from this project. Good for him - nothing like a capatilist marxist.

398 Gringo  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:12:50pm

#59 OpininginDC
"For another, the memorial is so damn big, about the only way you're going to see it as it appears in the map is from the Space Shuttle.
I tend to agree more with #12...it's the attitude of the whole thing that's off-putting. These people did something that day: something heroic, selfless, and pro-active...that's what deserves memorialized, not how sad/proud the rest of us felt about it."
___
Exactly, it's about those that died and that's exactly why a red crescent is an insult to them. It is the symbol of their killers and will be so whether you can readily see it from the ground or not.

399 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:14:33pm

I would also suggest that any of you sending off letters, kindly drop one to the Gov of Pa., Ed Rendell.

He is a Dem, but he will be up for reelection.

He is also fully aware that the #1 paricipant sport in PA is deer hunting.

400 hithere  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:14:58pm

The VA provides to qualified veterans a headstone for their grave. The VA specifies,

No graphics (logos, symbols, etc.) are permitted on Government-furnished headstones or markers other than the approved emblems of belief, the Civil War Union Shield, the Civil War Confederate Southern Cross of Honor, and the Medal of Honor insignias.


The approved emblem of belief for Muslims is a crescent and star. No other emblem of belief uses a crescent, at least not the ones listed here: VA Headstone & Marker Info

Note: I do not mean to cast any aspersions on the honorable service of Muslims in our military. But let's drop all pretense that the crescent is anything other than a Muslim symbol.

401 PETN Sandwich  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:15:10pm

#390 locutus

Mayor Nagin memorial to the victims of Katrina

I suggest a trio, or more, of bronze figures -

Mayor Nagin
Gov Blanko
A couple of NOLA Cops
And a roulette table.

402 PETN Sandwich  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:16:10pm

#390 locutus

And perch the whole affair on a mound of nude bronze bodies.

403 locutus  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:19:53pm
A couple of NOLA Cops

Should they be depicted as A.) Walking off the job/not reporting for duty, or B.) Looting a Wal-Mart?

404 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:21:56pm
405 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:23:07pm
406 Grandma  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:27:12pm

As far as memorials go, I know of one in a small town in NJ where my late husband’s name is chiseled into a stone monument as a veteran of W.W.II. Nobody ever goes there nor reads any of the names, and even if they did, they wouldn’t remember him anymore. Same with Gettysburg. Tourists go there, but nobody remembers the individuals. The “sustainable construction” of memorials are not necessarily for the individuals who died; they are more about the results that their collective efforts produced in order to keep our country the great nation it is today. A memorial of the sort that will be devoted to Flight 93 is really for future Americans. They need to understand how those brave people defended what is right from that which was wrong. Decades from now, the folks that go to these memorials won’t have any idea about the identity of the individuals, all they should know from the memorial was that those people fought with their lives so that they can come and visit a site where some terrifically brave people banded together at the moment and did the right thing so they can live. Now if some “artist/architect” can come up with that, I’ll be okay with it. But as it stands in PA right now, they don’t get my approval.

407 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:27:53pm
408 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:30:05pm
409 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:31:41pm
410 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:33:26pm
411 karmic_inquisitor  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:35:53pm

Any Lizardoids in Pennsylvania?

If so, contact the Greater Pittsburgh Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. That's right - the ACLU.

Why?

In 1989, they went all the way to the Supreme Court and won a case ( ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. GREATER PITTSBURGH ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989) ) where they sued Allegheny County over "two recurring holiday displays located on public property in downtown Pittsburgh".

Given that the symbol in question is religious and that its name encourages one to "embrace" it, a reasonable observer would conclude that this is a prohibited promotion of a particular religion over others, especially given the context of the memorial - where the murdered were victims of a declared "jihad."

No. Brainer.

Where is the ACLU?

412 Spiny Norman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:38:14pm

Why do I get the feeling that those on this thread defending this insult of a memorial would also try to defend a Holocaust Memorial in the shape of a Swastika?

413 Spiny Norman  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:39:48pm

#411 Karmic Inquisitor

Given that the symbol in question is religious and that its name encourages one to "embrace" it, a reasonable observer would conclude that this is a prohibited promotion of a particular religion over others...

Wrong religion, silly.

414 Sandy P  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:42:22pm

After just watching the movie, I have a few choice words - 1 is abomination.

415 karmic_inquisitor  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:42:39pm

#413 Spiny Norman -

I forgot. It is the Religion of Peace, so it is a Peace symbol, not a religious one.

Where is my head?

/not in my ass

416 Buckaroo  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 7:51:35pm

# 414 S P

I sure hope 1000s of people visit the memorial site mentioned at the end of the movie and put 2 and 2 together ...

Watching that incredibly gut-wrenching film solidified in my mind that I will do whatever it takes, up to and including civil disobedience, until that memorial design is changed!

417 Globular Cluster  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 8:02:51pm

Please tell me these monuments aren't really happening. Is their nothing anybody can do to stop the outrage before it's too late?

418 OpininginDC  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 8:13:43pm

#398

Gringo,

I know it's long lost in Reaganite's and my little lover's scuffle, but I ultimately agreed with this thread a long time ago, although not for the reasons you cited. (see #122 above)

You also make a good point. I still have to say what I said originally, though...I just don't really see the "Islamic" crescent without the superimposed graphic...particularly from the vantage point of someone in the memorial. And, like I said, my experiences with the WWII memorial in DC just left me with some doubts about the early posts in this thread.

But what I see doesn't matter. Lawhawk's point that it would be interpreted as such by the terrorists regardless of what I do/don't see made a convincing and practical point.


#378

Mongoose,

Who are you? Mrs. Krabappel?

Whatever...I have to say I don't really give a crap about something so petty.


#379

Reaganite,

Oh, dear, dear Reaganite. Blah-blah-blah. I'd bet almost everyone else is at least as bored with this hen-peck, little-old-lady-style bickering as I am. If nothing else, we are so beyond off topic it's embarrassing.

Either way, I'm clearly not going to convince you that I'm not as narrowminded as you'd like to think I am...so think what you will.

For my part, I can no longer be your little OCD event for the night.

Good night, everyone.

419 Buckaroo  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 8:16:19pm

# 417 G C

It's not too late -- I've been trying to send web comments to the Natl. Park Service all weekend but their page craps out when you submit -- wonder why that is? They have no idea the gathering blogswarm that needs to hit full force tomorrow a.m. ...

420 hous bin pharteen  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 8:45:28pm

Nope.

No moonbats involved in this huh.

"But Tom Sokolowski, the director of the Andy Warhol Museum, and one of the Stage II jury members, said that claim is "asinine."

"If the families of the 40 people who were killed felt this was an appropriate symbol to honor their loved ones, then I think he is delusional," he said. "To take this small-minded, bigoted view is disgusting and repellent." Pittsburg Post Gazette.
[Link: www.post-gazette.com...]

Some of his art work.


Pits Post Gazette


Its funded by The Heinz Endoments.

Yes, you guessed it.The Tides foundation
Theresa Heinz.

Nope. No moonbats here. These arent the droids your looking for.

I guess we just need a more nuanced memorial.

I wonder about the other names on the board that voted for this thing.

421 zombie  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 9:03:02pm
#299 Photios
#29 zombie
I am going to quote your post on my blog and will link to your site. Thanks for the great information.

Good -- I'm glad you put up the Gale Norton contact info. You've got a nice overview of the controversy on your site too. If everybody did as you did, this issue would get to the public eye faster. Keep up the good work!

422 Buckaroo  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 9:05:28pm

# 421 z

Have you noticed the natl. park web comment site craps out and never gives an acknowledgement after a comment is submitted?

Wonder if they are overloaded?

What would you suggest for some next steps?

423 jimmytheclaw  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 9:18:11pm

in case nobody else pointed it out ace of spades blog is reporting the points of the crescent are pointed at mecca

424 Rayra[deleted]  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 9:22:56pm
425 Bill Whittle  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 10:15:27pm

Dear Mr. Murdoch,

I believe that Flight 93 represents the very highest and most noble elements of the American character. I believe that there should be a memorial to these brave people -- that and much more.

But how tone-deaf does one have to be to have that monument be in the shape of a giant CRESCENT? The last words being screamed from that flight were undoubtedly "Allahu ackbar!" These Americans were MURDERED by Muslim fundamentalists, and you propose a monument in the shape of the symbol of Islam? Can you not begin to see how insulting that is to millions and millions of Americans, not to mention to people who gave their lives that day fighting extremists representing the Crescent?

For the love of God, change the design. This is as insulting as having a Holocaust memorial consisting of a tasteful and understated grove of six million cherry trees, arranged in a field in the shape of a swastika.

Flight 93 deserved better than this, and you owe it to them -- and to us -- to produce a monument to their courage and sacrifice. They were unambiguous in their actions. Their memorial should be unambiguous as well.

I cannot tell you how disappointed I and millions of other Americans are with your choice. If you were unaware of the connotations of the crescent prior to its selection, you have now been informed. If you were aware of them, then you should be ashamed of yourself.

If you decide to ride this out sir, to put your head down and insist upon it, then there is a chance you will have your way. And what you will have done is let the ego of one individual trump the dismay of millions of Americans who have had enough of this moral ambiguity.

You do not own Flight 93. They belong to America. You have no right to dishonor them in this way.

Sincerely,

Bill Whittle

426 denbike  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 10:25:08pm

I propose a bronze sculpture of a drink-cart with a hand sticking out from underneath holding a box-cutter.

427 Hannitized  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 10:28:42pm

I propose that we "cleanse" the site. I'm going to visit with a big jar of Bac-O's and...

428 Robt S.  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 10:34:54pm

Just saw the movie.

Then found this.

Bios of the UAF93 Heroes

429 Jakester  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 10:52:49pm

Honestly, what the IFC for the WTC proposes is far better than this nonsense. Reminds me of that lame-o forgotten TV show, "The Education of Max Bickford" about some aging leftist prof. His alleged class's idea of remmebering the WTC was to chant some Muslim crap and honor Islam.

430 truthhunter  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 11:03:51pm

I just finished watching the film. It brought up so many memories and strong emotions of that day. I read the controversy regarding the memorial site, and agree 100% the current design is highly offensive. In watching the program tonight, I noticed the hijackers wore RED bandanas. Perhaps I am being too sensitive but after seeing the Red Cresent resemblence of the memorial, and those red bandanas worn by those animals I don't think anything on that memorial site which could in any way offer a symbolic acknowledgment of victory should be used. That includes red cresents, red head bands, t-shirts or whatever...

431 Patrick Chester  Sun, Sep 11, 2005 11:10:55pm

Oh come on we can compromise... with the big arrow pointing to Mecca someone proposed earlier. Or maybe a giant cannon. Or catapult. ;)

432 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 2:53:22am

This is the wave of the future, folks.

There was a time when sculptures, painters, poets, and composers loved their countries and created great works to enshrine its glories.

These works would tell the tale of great deeds and people. They would provide way for future generations to show their children the importance of historical events and personalities. Once in a while, some malcontent would defile them with graffiti, knock a head off a statue, or throw paint on a portrait.

Now, things are different.

It is the malcontents who make the memorials and monuments. The controversy of the Vietnam memorial was probably the first inkling of the this but the 9/11 memorial, and now this giant piece of Islamic graffiti show that this is indeed a trend.

This is what America has become.

Get used to it or start changing it.

433 daughter of patriots  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 2:59:53am

I watched the Discovery ch. show on Flight 93 last evening, family members recalling the last words & actions of their lost one revealed an American pride in strength & purpose of will in their fight against the Islamists' agenda. Now, these same folk will allow the allah-akbar crowd to win? I've read reports the families do not mind the design? This is wake up time, before the cockpit door opens!

434 Son Of The Godfather  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 3:12:34am

Hey, here's a newsflash...

You know how Google usually puts up a little graphic on significant days? (I think they had a shamrock or leprechaun on St. Patrick's day, for instance).

What do you think they put up on 9/11/05?

That's right, absolutely nothing.

SOTG

PS: Oh yeah, the Google sponsored ad for the day displayed "More torture at Gitmo - Video Here!"

I like Google's search engine, but I gotta get out. Anyone know of a search engine as efficient?

435 FlyingTigress  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 3:50:57am

#430

In watching the program tonight, I noticed the hijackers wore RED bandanas. Perhaps I am being too sensitive but after seeing the Red Cresent resemblence of the memorial, and those red bandanas worn by those animals I don't think anything on that memorial site which could in any way offer a symbolic acknowledgment of victory should be used. That includes red cresents, red head bands, t-shirts or whatever...

Of course, they could simply be a group of gay Muslims who are using the 'red (hankerchief)' bandana as a code for their preferred 'activity.'

I'll spare my fellow Lizards the details of what a Google search came up with for the 'hanky' codes (color, pattern, and where carried) that some gay men use -- and 'red' in particular. I happened to know of the practice, since I have a couple of gay male friends who've told me about it in response to a question.

It could be bitterly un-coincidental, for one.

436 web02  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 4:54:48am

Shoot folks, LGF is better than this. I go over to the Kosy Kossie Klan for this type of tripe. They see a conservative plot behind every bush, under every rock, in every word that does not avidly endorse the Kosy Kossie Klan Plan.

Yeah, this thing in in the shape of an arc. The arc is a very useful and pleasing shape. If you look around, you'll find it all over the place. An arc isn't an Islamic Crescent unless you want it to be.

If there is an Islamic Crescent in this, it is because you want to see it. It's just another liberal plot hidding in the guise of a monument.

I choose to see this as a memorial to brave Americans who fought and defended us all, not a subtle Islamic slap in the face.

Come on folks. This type of paranoia is the hallmark of the Kosy Kossie Klan, not LGF.

437 Yank in the EU  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 5:31:55am

#436 web02

I think you're wrong about that.

Not only has the point been made abundently clear by Charles' and Zombie's comments / pages, but the same valid argument has been made at least 70 times over the last two "Crescent of Embrace" (which in fact is what the designers call it) threads.

Summary: they're putting a giant, red crescent in the spot where Flight 93 crashed in PA, as a result of the passengers most likely attacking the Islamic terrorists. The point is to embrace the Islamic symbol in a moment of multiculturalism and understanding. It is obvious to every one that is meant as the symbol of Islam since we all know what the crescent means among the many possible symbols (yes, really: read what the designers wrote about why a 'crescent'). They even spoke abou their thoughts beforehand about whether to call it by its name or not: a crescent.

Thought experiment: what would the ACLU and their supportes say if the shape of the memorial was a giant cross, meanwhile the Christian conservatives are saying: 'it's not a Christian symbol'?

Ok, let's give the designers the benefit of the doubt and imagine that thay had the best of intentions in here. They tried to create a site / memorial to foster understanding between Americans and Islam. Even so, they failed to recognize how this will be seen by the victims of the Islamic terrorists as a terrific insult. It is an insult.

438 web02  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 5:41:28am

I respect LGF. I don't enjoy seeing the rabid paranoia of the Kosy Kossie Klan modus operandi take root here.

I would like to see the monument changed - not because it IS an insult, but because it could be perceived as an insult by some.

I begin to see that reverse PC is as bad as PC itself.

Let us leave the rabid paranoia to the Kosy Kossie Klan!

439 FlyingTigress  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 5:50:57am

#437

And, it might simply be a coincidence that the bloody crescent arc of love is on line towards the Black Rock?

"Hey... I felt the karma of the Universe flowing on that line."

/designer

Freud said that "a cigar is [sometimes] just a cigar", but that means that sometimes it isn't.

440 FlyingTigress  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 5:58:24am

#437

And the TANG memos were accurate and true, too?

441 Yank in the EU  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 6:01:33am

#438 web02

I would like to see the monument changed - not because it IS an insult, but because it could be perceived as an insult by some.

Try to think clearly about this for one moment:

Why might the designers perceive that the shape of the memorial will be offensive to some?

What is the grounds of the possible offense?

Did they of know this connection before - or is this too bizarre, something for the 'rabid paranoiacs' ?

---

They clearly knew exactly that the symbol of the crescent is an Islamic symbol and that many would perceive it this way. Consider then their notions of a "Crescent of Embrace" and how this is meant to foster 'understanding and sensitivity'.

442 web02  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 6:02:52am

You win. Sinister forces are on the loose targeting the memorial to those who died on Flight 93.

If they succeed, they will so we must be ever vigilent and alert for this insidious infiltration.

And beware, I have heard that Islamic witches have been seen in Salem MA. Go get 'em, Tiger!

I think I'll go check out the Kosy Kossie Klan Klowns and return here when the paranoia has diminished.

But remain vigilent. Remain watchful. Remain alert. The forces arrayed against you are vast and clever.

Alas, the disappointment. LGF/Kosy Kossie Klan paranoia looks pretty much the same. That is how it is! Everyone is out to get ya' guys. Enjoy it.

443 Yank in the EU  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 6:09:44am

Not "sinister", now you're drawing absurd conclusions.

These leftist architects came up with the idea of a gesture of solidarity between Islam and America at the site of this hijacked plane crash.

How does that strike you as even abnormal?

444 TalkinKamel  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 6:30:14am

#442 web02

Yessir, nothing's wrong here! Nothing to worry about at all, after 9/11, nup, nup, nup! You silly guys, worrying about Islamic witches, you sound just like those silly Kos Kowardly-Kustards! Why, there's nothing to worry about!

All is peace in and love! Next, you'll be telling me Iran shouldn't get nukes! HAHAHAHAHAHAH! It is to laugh!

445 web02  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 6:41:26am

If you go to Michelle Malkin's page, you can see an animation if the extra parts that we need to complete the crescent (she links to [Link: www.zombietime.com...]
for just the image).

The initial image looks pretty much like a 180 degree arc of constant thickness with what appears to be walls tailing off and continuing the CIRCLE on the inside diameter.

The crescent requires a fair amount of sanding and filling to the original form. I suspect that with the proper lighting, we could show that the Capital dome is in reality an Islamic crescent.

I'd rather not fill in the blanks to produce the desired negative effect. The MSM does this more than enough. The Kosy Kossie Klan is unreal in its paranoia. LGF is simply disappointing.

And as I recall, it goes "Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean that they aren't out to get you".

446 Yank in the EU  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 6:50:48am

#445 web02

Um, I'm beginning to think you're a complete bozo. I just went to MM's site and she came to the same exact conclusions as Charles, Zombie and LGF. You said you were going to hang out with the Kos lunatics - your lack of reasoning will be welcomed there. Have fun.

447 chilltheham  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 6:53:32am

This is my message to Sec. Norton:

Dear Secretary Norton,

It has come to my attention that the memorial design selected for the victims and heroes of flight 93 in Shanksville, PA is to resemble a large red crescent. Surely you realize that the crescent is a symbol of Islam, and that islamic terrorists are to blame for the devastation of 9/11. Allowing this design to be approved would send a message to the islamic terrorists that we are weak and will not honor our own fallen heroes. This disturbs me so much that I feel I must write to you so that you may take appropriate measures to prevent this travesty.

Please look into this matter. Symbolism is very important in the global war on terrorism, and if the United States were to approve a memorial which symbolically gives islamic terrorists comfort and a reason to believe that we do not have the will to persecute this war to its final conclusion, then we truly do not deserve to win.

448 web02  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 7:23:41am

I didn't say read her conclusions. I said, look at the animation and what has got to be done to it to make the case.

I usually agree with MM (except for the Schiavo thing). I disagree with her here.

The crescent at this memorial site doesn't really exist until we fill in the missing parts and remove the excess parts.

It is the required filling and sanding that bothers me. This isn't any different than taking a John Roberts joke out of context, and, when appropriately massaged, proving that he is anti women. The case should be obvious with out the massaging.

As a fan, I hold LGF to a higher standard. I will continue to ba a fan and I will continue to expect a higher standard.

PS: Different subject: This is interesting if true (I suspect it is):
[Link: www.post-gazette.com...]

449 pioneer1/11  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 7:27:59am

DO not expect the liberal sons of jackals and pigs to back down. Instead plan.

If you remove the bark of a tree all the way around for about 3 or 4 inches the tree will die. Two or three people could destroy the abomination in one night.

450 crabtree  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 7:37:01am

Where's the ACLU when you need them? If they change it to a cross I'm sure they would be right on the case.

451 web02  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 7:51:17am

How about this pattern? Is seems kinda neutral.

A
A
BBBABBB
A
A
CCCACCC
A
A

Oops, take off the C's and there is a cross. Never mind.

I wonder if there is any shape to which objection will not be made by someone.

452 Bob Munck  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 7:53:41am

So no one's complaining about the other half of the Islamic logo, the five-pointed star? No calls to remove it from our various national symbols, such as the American flag? They had it first, after all. Why did Betsy Ross hate America?

453 winsmom  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 7:56:28am

Trees die everyday from all kinds of things...
just sayin'.

454 web02  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 8:06:47am

A five pointed star would be fine, as long as it isn't drawn with a red outline.

455 milford421  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 8:22:44am

Info for all from NEIN:

"Well, if you find this as objectionable as I do, then it is time to make your voices heard. The final decision regarding the design of this memorial must be ultimately approved by The Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Ms.Gale A. Norton. We must let her know in strong numbers that this anticipated design is completely unacceptable. Messages can be sent to her via e-mail at: gale_norton@ios.doi.gov, or use the site’s Internet contact page. If you choose to call, her telephone number is (202) 208-3100.

Before reaching Ms. Norton, however, the design must also be approved by the Superintendent of the Flight 93 National Memorial, National Park Service, 109 West Main Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501-2035. You can voice your comments by e-mail, by telephone at (814) 443-4557 or by fax to (814) 443-2180.

In any event, you CAN let your voice be heard and hopefully make a difference."

456 FlyingTigress  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 8:42:35am

#454

Could you imagine the hissy-fit if the following design of the stars in the field were reinstated?

F. Hopkinson Flag

WE KNEW IT! WE KNEW IT! THE JOOOS!

457 abolitionist  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 9:08:14am

web02...
Quick explanation of my nic: islam = slavery, from top to bottom, for any society that embraces it, as THE organizing principle.

If I hated muslims, and all mankind, I would wish their god and their holy book on all muslims, and simply wait for them to follow the instructions therein.

Since I don't, and believe that Sun Zu spoke/wrote wisely about "know your enemy and yourself", I recommend instead the opposite:

WE should read the koran. And muslims should NOT. For when they do, they tend to surrender their humanity.

I read many books when I was young. The koran and Mein Kampf are the only two that I deliberately burned.

Please try to keep in mind that some problems pre-date the current administration, or the day you were born.

458 LemonJoose  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 9:35:58am

This is a difficult one for me to decide on. I can understand the argument that the crescent/arc/semicircle is an extremely simple shape and is a common feature in architecture. However, I can also see the argument for avoiding its use in this case because of its association with Islam. If it could somehow be made into a more defiant statement that we are co-opting or taking back this symbol of Islam (I'm not sure how), then I might be able to swallow it. It would end up being more like how early Americans adopted the derisive term "Yankee" as a proud label that bound them together against the British.

However, I suspect that there really is no way to effectively co-opt this symbol in that way. It is indeed like the Nazi swastika in that respect. The swastika was also a commonly used symbol/icon long before Hitler came along, but after the Third Reich the symbol is too tainted to be used for anything for hundreds of years at least. I feel the same way about the crescent, at least in the context of any memorial related to 9/11 or the War on Terror.

459 Clutch  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 10:23:32am

Make the crecent into a blast shield deflector for a replica of an ICBM pointed towards Mecca... (yeah, I know that ICBM's pop straight up out of their silos; I'm using (nose in the air, snooty intonation) "artistic interpretation"...) Put a screaming, pissed off-looking American Eagle with claws fully extended at the tip instead of a conventional warhead. If you are offended by this image, then you can suck-@ss on back to wherever the hell it is that your rotten @ss came from and die there...

460 Jed  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 11:11:42am

The design still has to be approved by the Director of the National Park Service and the Secretary of the Interior.

I have just written them urging them to disapprove of the design.

Don't just sit there. If you believe that the design is a desecration and a disgrace, write:

Fran P. Mainella
Director, National Park Service
1849 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20240


Gale A. Norton
Secretary of the Interior
US Department of the Interior
1849 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20240

If you don't write, don't complain.

461 karmic_inquisitor  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 12:07:33pm

Yank -

I think you have summed up the "ideas" behind the design very well. The whole concept behind "embrace" is inclusion and the crescent is obviously a symbol of what we are being inclusive of - Islam. I suppose the intent is to say "we don't fear you - we wish to include you." Fine insofar as art goes, or even a memorial - but by the government?

The problem for me with this is that this "outreach" for a multi-cultural inclusion of a religion is none of the governments business. At all. The ebb and flow of religious ideas is something the courts have been very good at keeping the government out of. But the multi-cultural impulse toward "inclusive" social engineering puts the government smack in the middle of that ebb and flow, as it tries to get people to "accept" Islam. This is such an attempt, and can not be construed as anything other than government promotion of a religion - even if intended to produce a more harmonious society. The founding fathers had the sense to know such efforts often backfire, which is why we got the First Ammendment.

462 gymnast  Mon, Sep 12, 2005 12:42:13pm

#452, Bob Munk. You must find it easy to make your way through life. When you are full of shit, people tend to smell you comming and get out of your way. When your ideas are excreable, and people get a whiff of your thought processes, they tend tend to distance themselves from you. Go back to your outhouse Bob, it is your place and station in life.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

  • Loading...

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Don't panic right away.

Follow Lizardoid on Twitter
Follow Charles on True/Slant

Tikatok Gift Cards - Capture your child's imagination . . . in a book!

 Frank says:

Anyone who is disturbed by the idea of newts in a nightclub is potentially dangerous.