Mary Mapes, the producer fired by CBS News for her role in the outrageous Rathergate scandal, has a book coming out, and just like Rather she takes refuge in illogical and scurrilous attacks against the blogs who exposed her dirty work: Rather’s Comforting Words for Mapes: ‘F—k ’Em All’.

Within a few minutes, I was online visiting Web sites I had never heard of before: Free Republic, Little Green Footballs, Power Line. They were hard-core, politically angry, hyperconservative sites loaded with vitriol about Dan Rather and CBS. Our work was being compared to that of Jayson Blair, the discredited New York Times reporter who had fabricated and plagiarized stories. [Exactly. —ed.]

All these Web sites had extensive write-ups on the documents: on typeface, font style, and peripheral spacing [this demonstrates Mapes’ complete lack of understanding; the term is “proportional” spacing. —ed.], material that seemed to spring up overnight. It was phenomenal. [If I do say so myself. —ed.] It had taken our analysts hours of careful work to make comparisons. It seemed that these analysts or commentators—-or whatever they were—-were coming up with long treatises in minutes. [Actually, there was about an hour and 52 minutes between my first question and my first real proof. —ed.] They were all linking to one another, creating an echo chamber of outraged agreement. [The horror! —ed.]

I was told that the first posting claiming the documents were fakes had gone up on Free Republic before our broadcast was even off the air! How had the Web site even gotten copies of the documents? We hadn’t put them online until later. That first entry, posted by a longtime Republican political activist lawyer who used the name “Buckhead,” set the tone for what was to come.

[Notice how she uses the weasel phrasing “I was told…” when bringing up this completely false, long-debunked accusation. —ed.]

There was no analysis of what the documents actually said, no work done to look at the content, no comparison with the official record, no phone calls made to check the facts of the story, nothing beyond a cursory and politically motivated examination of the typeface. That was all they had to attack, but that was enough.

Rand Simberg tears this one apart.