Human Rights Watch Enables Palestinian Propaganda

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Wed Jun 21, 2006 at 8:10 am PDT • Views: 419

Contrary to yesterday’s report, the anti-Israel, anti-America, George Soros-funded Human Rights Watch is not backing down on their claims about the Gaza beach bombing. In fact, they’re stepping up their attacks: Rights group says Israel beach death probe not credible.

JERUSALEM (AFP) - A US-based rights group has accused Israel of ignoring evidence and conducting an incomplete investigation into the deaths of eight Palestinian civilians, demanding an international inquiry.

“The Israel Defence Forces’ (IDF) investigation of the Gaza beach explosion that killed eight Palestinian civilians and wounded dozens is incomplete because it excludes important evidence,” Human Rights Watch (HRW) said Wednesday.

The New York-based group released the statement Tuesday after meeting Meir Klifi, the general responsible for the army’s internal inquiry into the June 9 beach deaths.

“An investigation that refuses to look at contradictory evidence can hardly be considered credible,” said Marc Garlasco, a senior military analyst at HRW. “The IDF’s partisan approach highlights the need for an independent, international investigation.”

An Israeli army inquiry has cleared the military of any wrongdoing and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has rejected calls for an international investigation.

Human Rights Watch said the army’s conclusion that it was not responsible for the deaths was based “exclusively” on information gathered by the IDF and excluded all evidence gathered by other sources.

The group, which unlike the army conducted its own investigation at the scene of the deaths, believes that the blast was caused by an Israeli shell fired several hours earlier and which later exploded.

Unbelievable. The Palestinians refused to allow the Israelis to investigate the scene at the time of the incident, and Human Rights Watch shill Marc Garlasco only got there several days afterward, giving the Palestinians more than enough time to alter the scene and plant false evidence. (Not that the scrupulously honest Palestinians would ever do such a thing, of course.)

And none of these facts are reported.

UPDATE at 6/21/06 8:42:59 am:

Klifi: IDF definitely not behind Gaza beach blast.

The blast on a Gaza beach 12 days ago that killed seven Palestinian civilians was definitely not caused by IDF shelling, Maj.-Gen. Meir Klifi, head of the IDF inquiry commission announced at a news conference on Wednesday.

“The examination of a second piece of shrapnel retrieved from the body of a boy who was wounded in the blast unequivocally shows that the explosion was not caused by a 155 mm artillery shell”, said Klifi, adding that it came from a different type of ammunition used by the IDF.

Klifi said that the commission would continue to investigate what was behind the explosion.
“There is a possibility that the explosion was caused by an unexploded IDF artillery shell that landed on the beach weeks or months ago and it is also possible that the blast was caused by an explosive device planted by Palestinian terrorist group,” he said.

Advertisement

84 comments

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Pls refudiate.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

Randall Gross
Pope's butler vows to help Vatican scandal probe
5 minutes ago
Views: 17 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 0

researchok
Lost Classics: An Address Delivered in 2009 to Graduates in Classics at UC Berkeley
6 hours, 4 minutes ago
Views: 78 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Haywood Jabloeme
SWATting the Ericksons
9 hours, 7 minutes ago
Views: 86 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Mostly sane, most of the time.
So wake up and notice already
9 hours, 16 minutes ago
Views: 67 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

MikeySDCA
Czech Pride in Jan Kubis, Killer of Reinhard Heydrich
17 hours, 11 minutes ago
Views: 133 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
1 day, 13 hours ago
Views: 186 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
1 day, 14 hours ago
Views: 209 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
2 days, 19 hours ago
Views: 788 • Comments: 16
Tweets: 25 • Rating: -6

MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
2 days, 20 hours ago
Views: 294 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Ascher
Israeli Who Saved Turk on Everest: You Never Abandon a Friend - Israel News, Ynetnews
2 days, 21 hours ago
Views: 364 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

 Frank says:

I feel it's better to sing about these things ourselves and perform them with the people who it happened to than to have some journalist one day say 'then in 1971, one time when they were at the mudshark hotel...' But people have problems with things of a glandular nature in connection with things of a musical nature. They say why, music is way up here, and glands are way down there and they can't get 'em together, but then they are hypocritical because they take a band that doesn't sing about such things directly and couches their language a little and does it with a little choreography and say that that's great and that's real rock and roll. I maintain that there's no difference, we're just honest enough to get up and say 'this is this and that's that and here you are and respond to it' and the response is 'why... I'm hip, but of course I am offended'.