New York Times’ Terrorist’s Bill of Rights

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Sat Mar 3, 2007 at 8:49 pm PST • Views: 451

It’s a terrorist’s Bill of Rights, brought to you by the editors of the New York Times: The Must-Do List. (Hat tip: JammieWearingFool.)

Apologize to the world, set all terrorists free so they can realize their full potential, and then everything will be peace and flowers again.

The language is completely indistinguishable from the kind of ugly moonbat rants you’d find at Counterpunch, Crooks and Liars, or Common Dreams.

The Bush administration’s assault on some of the founding principles of American democracy marches onward despite the Democratic victory in the 2006 elections. The new Democratic majorities in Congress can block the sort of noxious measures that the Republican majority rubber-stamped. But preventing new assaults on civil liberties is not nearly enough.

Five years of presidential overreaching and Congressional collaboration continue to exact a high toll in human lives, America’s global reputation and the architecture of democracy. Brutality toward prisoners, and the denial of their human rights, have been institutionalized; unlawful spying on Americans continues; and the courts are being closed to legal challenges of these practices.

It will require forceful steps by this Congress to undo the damage. A few lawmakers are offering bills intended to do just that, but they are only a start. Taking on this task is a moral imperative that will show the world the United States can be tough on terrorism without sacrificing its humanity and the rule of law.

Today we’re offering a list — which, sadly, is hardly exhaustive — of things that need to be done to reverse the unwise and lawless policies of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

Advertisement

715 comments

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

I don't want to use Wade's hairbrush!

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

William Barnett-Lewis
A Civil War in the Olive Garden Parking Lot
39 minutes ago
Views: 35 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Randall Gross
Anarchists Attack Science : Nature News & Comment
51 minutes ago
Views: 47 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 2 • Rating: 0

MikeySDCA
5 Seemingly Harmless Things That Are Stressing You Out
1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Views: 54 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

researchok
Lost Classics: An Address Delivered in 2009 to Graduates in Classics at UC Berkeley
8 hours, 35 minutes ago
Views: 107 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Haywood Jabloeme
SWATting the Ericksons
11 hours, 38 minutes ago
Views: 113 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Mostly sane, most of the time.
So wake up and notice already
11 hours, 46 minutes ago
Views: 79 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
1 day, 16 hours ago
Views: 191 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
1 day, 17 hours ago
Views: 220 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
2 days, 21 hours ago
Views: 806 • Comments: 17
Tweets: 25 • Rating: -6

MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
2 days, 22 hours ago
Views: 302 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

 Frank says:

I feel it's better to sing about these things ourselves and perform them with the people who it happened to than to have some journalist one day say 'then in 1971, one time when they were at the mudshark hotel...' But people have problems with things of a glandular nature in connection with things of a musical nature. They say why, music is way up here, and glands are way down there and they can't get 'em together, but then they are hypocritical because they take a band that doesn't sing about such things directly and couches their language a little and does it with a little choreography and say that that's great and that's real rock and roll. I maintain that there's no difference, we're just honest enough to get up and say 'this is this and that's that and here you are and respond to it' and the response is 'why... I'm hip, but of course I am offended'.