LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

Sweden Democrats Document Dump

Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 6:47:16 pm PDT

Following my post about the Vlaams Belang party in Belgium, and the Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden Democrats) party in Sweden, I received an email from Ted Ekeroth, an active politician in the Sweden Democrats, asking me to reconsider my opinion about his party.

If you haven’t noticed yet, I have serious misgivings about both Vlaams Belang and Sverigedemokraterna.

Ekeroth included the following documents with his email, and because I have an enormous respect for the group intelligence of the lizard army, and because I’m trying to be fair even while the hackles rise on the back of my neck, I’m putting them online and inviting comments. (And of course, I’ll form my own opinions as well.)

Most of these documents are in Microsoft Word format (the last one is a PDF), and they’ve been checked for viruses.

Bjorn_Soder_Sweden_should_support_israel.doc

Bjorn_Soder_Press_release_audi_tapes.doc

From_the_Sweden_Democrats_about_racism_and_nazism.doc

Bjorn_Soder_Press_release_Hamas_visit.doc

Bjorn_Soder_2006-17_2006-41_Churchmeeting_-_Reg.doc

Presentation_of_the_Sweden_democrats.pdf

UPDATE at 10/25/07 7:45:51 pm:

As a counterpoint to these documents, read the “Controversies” section of this Wikipedia entry: Sweden Democrats.

Advertisement

678 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 friarstale  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 6:48:59pm

it's so refreshing to see both sides treated fairly

2 MattMacD  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 6:50:27pm

re: #1 friarstale

it's so refreshing to see both sides treated fairly

Indeed, this is how discussions should be. But I guess it's part of human nature to have... uncivilised discussion. Tribal mentality, ego, all that stuff.

3 ointmentfly  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 6:51:47pm

When I need a sauna, I'll call Sweden..... who cares if they elect their own asswarts?

4 Kailen  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 6:52:22pm
...kidnap Israeli soldiers...

The first document, quoted above, obviously calls for Sweden to take an active stance against Israel for it's actions in Lebanon.

...At least, that's how Media Matters could spin it.

5 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 6:56:20pm

re: #3 ointmentfly

Because they've become active in the Anti jihad movement and some of the American right are starting to embrace them as friends.

6 Sponge  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:01:45pm

It's good to see that there are political factions in the world that can try to show their stance and prove their points in an attempt convince, instead of insulting and browbeating you into submission like it is in politics here in the good ole USA.

7 marinetb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:04:13pm

I don't even pretend to understand the European mind-set. We should look askance at dubious credentials but not throw the baby out........Guess I'll just fence-sit for the time being and keep watching, listening and reading. However we don't need Charles and Pamela going at it hammer and tong.

Tom

8 zygazint  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:06:05pm

re: #7 marinetb

I don't even pretend to understand the European mind-set. We should look askance at dubious credentials but not throw the baby out........Guess I'll just fence-sit for the time being and keep watching, listening and reading. However we don't need Charles and Pamela going at it hammer and tong.

Tom

yep - dissension in the ranks is good so long as it knows when to cease and desist for the sake of peace.

9 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:06:29pm

re: #6 Sponge

Yup. Too bad we're talking about Nazis here.

10 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:06:39pm

Does anyone else have a problem opening these in Word? If not, I'm confused, because I've got Word up, and they're not loading.

I'm a bit frustrated.

11 avideditorla.com[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:07:06pm
12 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:07:31pm

From this, Swedish Democrats look acceptable but I can't get those nazi costumes out of my mind. It is true that the party leaders banned them, but why were members wearing them in the first place?

Vlaams Belang is an easier call, it is a skinhead gang until proven otherwise.

13 zygazint  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:07:38pm

re: #9 Pro-Bush Canuck

re: #6 Sponge

Yup. Too bad we're talking about Nazis here.

That's true too - slippery slope...

14 Sponge  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:07:57pm

re: #9 Pro-Bush Canuck

Agreed.....it's propaganda, but at least they were nice about it.

/I hate Illinois democrats nazis....

15 avideditorla.com[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:08:44pm
16 David IV of Georgia  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:08:53pm

From the documents, it appears that they are normal (i.e. not racist or nazi) people. However, these documents may just be clever attempts to allay fears and garner support. I wish to see and learn more before I accept them as friends. Unfortunately, I don't know Swedish.

That said, I would also note that LGF also gets labeled—misnomers are often applied to us.

17 DoubleU  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:09:09pm

It is easy enough to convert them all to small PDF files.

18 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:09:36pm

From the last PDF.....

Most of these mistakes were made between the years of 1991 and 1994. During these years the party was temporarily radicalised due to bad leadership and the fact that the anti-immigration, populist party “Ny Demokrati” (New Democracy), was formed, reached the national parliament and drained our party on most of its more established members.
The worst of these mistakes was that the party didn’t distance itself from radical youths with sub cultural looks and that these were allowed to participate in some of the party demonstrations.
In 1995 New Democracy collapsed and the Sweden Democrats elected a new party leader. Since then we have been working very hard to distance ourselves from all forms of extremism, to learn from our mistakes and to change our image.
Today the Sweden Democrats are a totally different party than it was between 1991 and 1994. Almost all members from those years have left the party or have been kicked out and all members of the national board joined the party after that period.

Then why has their representative to the city council giving a speech at a rally in front of a Nazi flag in 1996?

19 mj  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:09:51pm

re: #7 marinetb

However we don't need Charles and Pamela going at it hammer and tong.

Tom

I don't think it's fair to equate Charles' response to Pamela's accusation that LGF is bedfellows with CAIR.

20 m  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:10:35pm

re: #10 Dianna

So far they are all opening for me.

21 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:10:48pm

re: #19 mj

If Pamela thinks LGF is "bedfellows" with CAIR, well she should change the bong water ASAP.

22 David IV of Georgia  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:11:24pm

The .doc files open fine in Abiword.

23 Kailen  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:11:27pm

All joking aside, the documents above appear to be pretty cut and dry. However, it to me smacks of saying what you think others want to hear - not in the actual content of the letters, but the specific selection of topics they cover. If someone looked hard enough, they can probably find a few examples from any individual or organization that are rational responses that state the situation as you agree with. However, such a small portion, as above, would not convince me one way or the other (especially given that the dates for some of the documents are a few years old).

My personal opinion is to accept it with a grain of salt.

24 Moonbat_One  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:11:32pm

Right wing European parties are not like right wing American parties, and Charles is right to be leery of associating with them.

Not really interested in reading their literature.

25 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:11:34pm
26 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:12:14pm

This is all bullshit. why would a Nazi organization have so much English literature about how they're not really Nazis on hand?
These guys are worse than Vlaams.

27 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:12:25pm

re: #21 Pro-Bush Canuck

re: #19 mj

If Pamela thinks LGF is "bedfellows" with CAIR, well she should change the bong water ASAP.

yeppers!

28 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:13:17pm

They're all, self serving press releases.

We are sadly aware of that a few members, like in other parties, had said and done things that do not comply to the party politics. [...] But from the start the party has withheld it’s democratic, peaceful and non-racist ways which easily can be checked by reading the older party programs.

Why does that have an eerily familiar ring to it, remind anyone of another group?

On the other hand, unlike that other group:

However, we will not hide the fact that we have made serious mistakes in our past that have made it a lot easier for our opponents to put these labels on us.

Most of these mistakes were made between the years of 1991 and 1994. During these years the party was temporarily radicalised due to bad leadership and the fact that the anti-immigration,
populist party “Ny Demokrati” (New Democracy), was formed, reached the national parliament and drained our party on most of its more established members.

At least they're talking the talk.

The main objectives of the Sweden Democrats are to:

Restore the sense of a common identity in Sweden
through reduced immigration, a strengthening of the
Swedish culture and the abolishment of multiculturalism in
favour of assimilation.

Strengthen traditional values, Christian ethics, the nuclear family and the sovereignty of the Swedish state.

. . .

/definitely not what we'd call democrats and too far to the militant right for my particular tastes

29 Dave the.....  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:13:25pm
When I need a sauna, I'll call Sweden..... who cares if they elect their own asswarts?

That's Finland. Sweden's gift to the world is Ikea.

30 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:13:59pm
31 Milk Toast Intolerant  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:14:02pm

Do they only want us to read articles that put them in a positive light only? You know how they say talk is cheap.

32 ointmentfly  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:14:34pm

re: #5 Killgore Trout

Maybe we ought to adopt the old arab adage - the enemy of my enemy is my friend - with regard to the possible skinhead wing of the party. What are the chances they would have time to mobilize against the Jews when they will obviously have their hands full with the tidal wave of your muslims....?

33 Sponge  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:14:39pm

So, is this truth or propaganda?

YOU be the judge.....


“The Sweden Democrats rejects Nazism, who’s lead motive is the “Führer”, “racial superiority” and aggressive war [...]”
The party action program for democratic development reads:
“Just as the name implies, the Sweden Democrats hails democracy as a form of government and firmly rejects antidemocratic movements, such as Nazism, Fascism and Communism.”
34 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:14:54pm

re: #26 Killgore Trout

Excellent point.

35 Jeff MacMillan  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:15:04pm

The Bjorn Documents if not all of them... Where's the official party logo? Where are the markings? Where's the signature?

It looks suspect to me. Nothing about these documents appear to be official documents.

36 m  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:15:35pm

re: #4 Kailen

When Palestinians kidnap Israeli soldiers and Hizbollah attacks army posts on Israeli soil it is clear that Israel should have the right to defend it self according the principle of self defense.

Not that one from the first one?

37 ointmentfly  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:15:36pm

re: #32 ointmentfly
young muslims....not 'your' muslims.......good cabernet flowing here.....

38 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:16:01pm

All right. It's a little strange to me that the two parties even need to so strenuously to distance themselves from Nazism. Even so, they do make the effort. So we've got two conflicting messages, here:

1) In this post they say, "We're not Nazis, don't like Nazis, weren't founded by Nazis..." and so on. Yet,

2) In a previous post they said, "Yeah, we don't wear the Nazi uniforms anymore."

So... which is it?

Frankly I'm a lazy citizen and I don't have a lot of free time on my hands. So anybody with a whiff of Nazism about them gets summarily tossed out of my mind. There are too many good and decent and unquestionably non-Nazi allies out there.

How bizarre, to even say such an obvious thing...

39 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:16:08pm

re: #32 ointmentfly

re: #5 Killgore Trout

Maybe we ought to adopt the old arab adage - the enemy of my enemy is my friend - with regard to the possible skinhead wing of the party. What are the chances they would have time to mobilize against the Jews when they will obviously have their hands full with the tidal wave of your muslims....?

So you're saying we should lower ourselves to be just as debased, evil and dishonest as our enemy? Why fight at all then? Might as well just give in to the jihadists if you're prepared to join up with Nazis.

40 Ma Sands  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:16:34pm

I hope that that Ted Ekeroth reads down this thread, and attempts to respond to some of the good, honest questions being put forth here.....that would be even nicer............dialogue! :)

41 lawhawk  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:16:37pm

It's fairly easy for an organization with an unsavory past (or present) to put lipstick on a pig. Any fairly competent PR person could spin things however you see fit. We see this in American politics every day - the way you can take a snippet here and there and turn someone into the second coming of Hitler, Stalin, or equate Bush with the aforementioned genocidal /demicidal leaders.

It wasn't all that long ago that members of the Democratic party were segregationists - Bob Byrd was a KKKer. And yet at some point they got rehabilitated.

These various documents do give a snapshot of what the Sweden Democrats claim to be now, but it is their earlier history, and some ongoing concerns (like timeline issues in Killgore's excerpt above) and that they haven't fully broken away from that earlier history that worry me.

42 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:16:57pm

re: #20 m

I found a work-around.

The problem's probably how my Male arranged the system; he's a Unix administrator, and he occasionally does things in ways I don't understand.

I'm reading.

The translators weren't really bilingual, were they?

43 americanpundit  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:17:02pm

Read the docs. They basically say they support Israel, want to keep Sweden Sweden, oppose Socialism, etc.

Obviously the documents are literature they handed out to try to dispel any misgivings about them. However, Charles presented multiple examples in his first post that showed quite a different picture than their literature states.

My opinion's not really been changed.

44 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:17:29pm

Personally, I think their stance is a littel self serving. I was able to extract the following from the first document, as it had the redlines and edit changes discoverable:

. . . and so, in the interests of getting laid, the leadership of the Sweden Democrats today resolves that we will disavow Nazism and have rotating visits to Kibbutz Ramat Nooki, where the weather is warm, and the babes are warmer.'

45 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:17:59pm

re: #32 ointmentfly

re: #5 Killgore Trout

Maybe we ought to adopt the old arab adage - the enemy of my enemy is my friend - with regard to the possible skinhead wing of the party. What are the chances they would have time to mobilize against the Jews when they will obviously have their hands full with the tidal wave of your muslims....?

Fascists ALWAYS have time to persecute Jews. During the Holocaust, German generals couldn't get rolling stock for troops and tanks because it was being used to haul Jews to the death camps.
To a Nordic racist, Jews and Muslims are variations on the same theme: the other, the semite, the dark stranger from outside.

46 Omega  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:18:00pm

Ron Paul.

47 segesta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:18:10pm

I think Sweden Democrats have learned a few tricks from CAIR. The words don't pass the, uh, smell test.

48 David IV of Georgia  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:18:38pm

Actions always speak louder than words.

49 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:18:39pm

re: #29 Dave the.....

Sweden's gift to the world is Ikea.

/and ABBA

50 anat  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:18:41pm

I don't know about this Swede movement, but I have certainly met some Europeans who support Israel only because they hate Arabs even more than Jews. This is not a good reason.

51 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:19:53pm

re: #41 lawhawk

It's the same people. They've simply realized they'll never make any progress if they go swanning about in lederhosen and epaulets, clicking their boot heels.

They are FAR less dangerous when they're all dressed up in their Nazi costumes. Once they start going "mainstream" is when the danger starts. Just like the hard Left in America.

52 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:19:57pm

Charles,
After reading these links I don't think it's reasonable to present this propaganda without commentary or balance.
Controversies


During the Swedish general election in 1998 it was discovered that two of the party's candidates for municipal election in Malmö had previously been members of two outspoken Nazi organisations; one was a member of the Nysvenska rörelsen and the other was a member of the National Socialist Front. Also, one of the party leaders in Helsingborg played in a white power band that had performed at the August 1998 National Socialist Front rally.[13]
....
A Sweden Democrat holding a seat in Kristinehamn left the party in 2003 after writing several anti-Semitic and Holocaust-denying letters to various authorities.[36]
....
On 22 March 2003, the SD candidate in Helsingborg was arrested by the police when he, together with several known Nazis (including the local leader of Nationalsocialistisk Front) attacked an anti-racist demonstration.[38]
...
For the 2004 election to the European Parliament, the party received 200,000 SEK from the Belgian anti-Semite Bernard Mengal.

These people are scum not worthy of consideration.

53 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:20:03pm

As if the issue isn't muddled enough, now we have these documents to sift through.

I don't know what to think anymore. I think I'm just going to wait and watch before I finalize an opinion about them....

~ENT

54 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:20:10pm

re: #26 Killgore Trout

This is all bullshit. why would a Nazi organization have so much English literature about how they're not really Nazis on hand?
These guys are worse than Vlaams.


Well, this hullaballoo has been going on for several days.

This Belch and Swedish situation is kind of like Israeli politics, I have a surface knowledge, but don't know enough details to really make a conclusive decision.

I would think Bat Ye'or and Robert Spencer would be aware of the company they keep. On the other hand, I doubt they vetted every participant.


Of course, if Ms. Geller had stated her disagreement with the LGF position on the political parties in question without basically accusing LGF of writing CAIR talking points, more light than heat could have been shed on the subject at hand.


BTW, the fact that this leader of the Swedish party would write to defend his group would suggest he does care what people think. It isn't like Storm Front e-mails Charles trying to convince him that they are all on the same side.

55 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:21:06pm

re: #32 ointmentfly

Many people are willing to make that compromise. Not me, never.

56 Sponge  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:21:09pm

re: #46 Omega

Ron Paul.

Now, if we can prove that he took money from the stormfront nazi's AND the Sweden democrats, you may have something there......

57 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:21:13pm

re: #49 Killian Bundy

And Saab. And Volvo. And numerous others.

Actually for the size of the country they are remarkably productive. What has Saudi Arabia produced with their petro-trillions?

58 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:21:28pm

re: #29 Dave the.....

When I need a sauna, I'll call Sweden..... who cares if they elect their own asswarts?

That's Finland. Sweden's gift to the world is Ikea.


I thought it was Abba and Ace of Bass.

59 ointmentfly  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:21:29pm

re: #39 Pro-Bush Canuck

'Join up' is a little harsh. Directing their hatred at our problem at hand is more like it.....

60 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:21:43pm

re: #31 Milk Toast Intolerant

Do they only want us to read articles that put them in a positive light only? You know how they say talk is cheap.

To be absolutely fair, they are responding to Charles' and our concerns by addressing them. I don't know that I believe them, but at least they're responding with translations of press releases with a history, and they're answering the questions.

What I'd like to see is a good history article by someone who knows Swedish politics, written before this contretemps.

61 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:21:59pm

re: #26 Killgore Trout

This is all bullshit. why would a Nazi organization have so much English literature about how they're not really Nazis on hand?
These guys are worse than Vlaams.

I'm thinking they recently translated it from Swedish. The English is poorly constructed.

62 Jeff MacMillan  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:22:04pm

I don't know what to say other than the documents are poorly translated, rushed, Microsoft Word, un-official, no way of knowing what the heck about them documents.

The gentleman may as well have given us a Scanned Image of a Napkin with these words on em.

63 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:22:32pm

re: #53 EtNorskTroll

You could take off your clothes and run around the room naked again....OOOOPS!

64 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:22:49pm

re: #54 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul

BTW, the fact that this leader of the Swedish party would write to defend his group would suggest he does care what people think.

That's the spooky thing. They have support here in America and want to keep it. I say "Fuck 'em."

65 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:22:53pm

re: #53 EtNorskTroll

As if the issue isn't muddled enough, now we have these documents to sift through.

I don't know what to think anymore. I think I'm just going to wait and watch before I finalize an opinion about them....

~ENT

I think that's a mistake, honestly.

I spelled out my view a little more thoroughly in Post 38, but it comes down to this: We do not need to fall in with people who have a "muddled" background, when it comes to Nazism.

Never.

66 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:23:28pm

re: #59 ointmentfly

Sorry but I just cannot function in that mode. If it comes down to it I'll take up arms against BOTH the jihadists AND the Nazis. I'll die before fighting alongside either.

67 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:23:54pm

I say we need Swedish lesbians, ham lovers, winos, gays and socialists on our side. Not ex-Nazis.

Especially Swedish lesbians.

68 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:24:22pm

re: #57 Pro-Bush Canuck

re: #49 Killian Bundy

And Saab. And Volvo. And numerous others.

Actually for the size of the country they are remarkably productive. What has Saudi Arabia produced with their petro-trillions?

Misery and death.

69 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:24:31pm

They read a lot like a CAIR press release.

70 COINTELPROAgent  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:24:38pm

re: #46 Omega

Ron Paul.

Exactly. You can tell whether a candidate/party is rotten or not by who their supporters are.

71 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:24:39pm

re: #53 EtNorskTroll

As if the issue isn't muddled enough, now we have these documents to sift through.

Gee, except for the seven pager(six without the picture), they're all less than a page.

/don't wear yourself out

72 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:24:52pm

re: #66 Pro-Bush Canuck

Remember that two entities fighting a third entity are not necessary fighting "side-by-side".

73 Kreuzueber Halbmond  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:25:00pm

Actions speak louder than words, but I believe this party is interested primarily in maintaining Swedish sovereignty and ethnicity. It is unfortunate that their cause was co-opted by radicals for a time and is now being ambushed by multiculturalist - politically correct idiots. I'd fight with them against the Islamists any time. Do not equate fascism with a people's desire to preserve their nationality against outside forces.

74 ointmentfly  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:25:15pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

I can't disagree with that, but when I see the enormity of the Jihadis sweeping Europe with their own vile hatred of western values, I wonder what besides an equivilent evil can beat it back?

75 Randman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:25:32pm

re: #39 Pro-Bush Canuck

If we didn't ally ourselves with the Soviets in WWII there was a chance that the Nazis would of won. #32 may have a point.

76 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:25:33pm

Good heavens, people.

The enemy of our enemy? What kind of trash is that?

I'll bail out of this joint in a hurry, if we start to think of Nazis -- or even the Nazi-ish -- as our friends.

77 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:25:38pm

Bill Clinton Rips into Moon Bats

78 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:25:41pm

re: #72 Malatrope

My point is that I would attack both of them equally. They are equally evil.

79 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:26:39pm

re: #52 Killgore Trout

Do you think that can be added to the list of things to read? I'm just finishing up the document dump right now, and I haven't had a chance to search for countervailing examples. We know my google-fu isn't as good as all that, too.

80 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:27:03pm

re: #75 Randman

1. We didn't know how evil the Soviet Union was.

2. We (you, the US) have OVERWHELMING force on our side. We don't need to compromise.

This whole conversation is making me feel slightly sick to my stomach. I'm dropping it.

81 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:27:26pm

Jeez, living under Nazi overlords vs Muslim overlords. Tough call.

I think I would prefer the muslim overlords. More generally incompetent.

82 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:27:29pm

re: #80 Pro-Bush Canuck

Seconded.

83 lawhawk  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:27:29pm

I hope someone with a background in Swedish politics could weigh in on this further and give more insight than a couple of self-selected pressers. What are these guys really up to?

84 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:27:38pm

re: #77 Jewels (AKA Julian)

Bill Clinton Rips into Moon Bats

[Link: www.liveleak.com...]

I must admit, I love it when he Sister Souljah's someone.

85 Jimmah  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:27:54pm

from : [Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Basic political ideas

The pillar of Sweden Democrats’ ideological message is manifest from the party's statement of principles, which it published in 2003:

"The critical ingredient of a safe, harmonic, solid and supportive society is the common identity, which in turn requires a high degree of ethnic and cultural uniformity amongst the people. From this, it follows that the nationalist principle, the principle of one state, one nation, is absolutely fundamental to the Sweden Democrats’ political values. The nationalist principle is based on the concept of the nation state, that the territorial boundaries of the state shall coincide with its demographic boundaries. In its ideal form, such a society is therefore ethnically homogenous. Cultural diversity is as necessary to mankind as biological diversity is to nature. The different cultures are mankind’s common heritage and they should be acknowledged and kept apart for the benefit of us all... Countries containing a multiple of relatively strong cultures have tended to develop in such a way that they end up diluting the different ethnicities and totally eradicating their original identities. We the Sweden Democrats believe that the safest way to protect the diversity of cultures, taking into consideration respect for human rights, is to do so as much as possible in the paradigm of the nation state." (Sverigedemokraterna 2003)

I couldn't open the last pdf file but I read the others. My take is that, if these papers are to be believed they might not be Israel/Jew-haters, but as the quote from the official policy declaration above shows they are nevertheless racists; like the BNP and some other European Nationalist far right parties these days they couch it in terms of preserving the purity of each race, rather than the superiority of their race. It's presented as a kind of 'equal opportunity racism' that is as much concerned with the future ability of Kenyans to run long distances as it is about the blue eyes and blond hair of Swedes. They equate nationality with race, and desire homogeneity and view mixed race as inferior. Whether the party publicly desires it or not, given their official statements on race and nationalism, it is perfectly understandable that they attract Nazis. These people stink and we don't need their stink on us.

86 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:28:18pm

re: #78 Pro-Bush Canuck

Well, let's fight them in the order in which they are attacking us. There are significantly fewer European neo-nazis than global muslim jihadis.

If two rivers are putting out a great big fire, and one of them is smelly and nasty and comes from a swamp, drain the swamp after the fire is out, that's all I'm trying to say.

87 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:28:26pm

Any policy statements in those docs about making the trains run on time?

88 3 wood  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:28:58pm

This from the last document:

However, we will not hide the fact that we have made serious mistakes in our past that have made it a lot easier for our opponents to put these labels on us.

Most of these mistakes were made between the years of 1991 and 1994. During these years the party was temporarily radicalised due to bad leadership and the fact that the anti-immigration,
populist party “Ny Demokrati” (New Democracy), was formed, reached the national parliament and drained our party on most of its more established members.

The worst of these mistakes was that the party didn’t distance itself from radical youths with sub cultural looks and that these were allowed to participate in some of the party demonstrations.

I think it was a bit more serious than that. My neck hairs are still standing up.

89 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:29:04pm

re: #83 lawhawk

I hope someone with a background in Swedish politics could weigh in on this further and give more insight than a couple of self-selected pressers. What are these guys really up to?

I think Fjordman has weighed in on this, no? On the side of the Swedish Democrats I believe. I could be wrong - don't hold me to this.

90 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:29:50pm

re: #67 Maine's Michael

Especially Swedish lesbians.

I know I'm going to regret asking this, but, why?

91 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:30:01pm

Charles,

I applaud your willingness to examine both sides on an issue. I really do. But lifting this particular carpet has exposed what appears to be a nasty aspect, at least within the comments section here.

I'm curious -- pointedly curious -- to hear your thoughts.

92 june_july  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:30:06pm

I dunno. It is striking that they have contacted Charles in a civil manner, offered information in whatever manner, and not ranted and raved like lunatics usually do.

It is likely that for some, even if they have anti-semitic inclination, the threat of the Jew has long since faded into irrelevance as Jews disappear from Europe, while the Muslim hordes continue to pour in.

I am keeping an open mind. I am a member at Brussels Journal too, and there is a mix there of really fine people, obvious racists and anti-semites, and white-supremacists.

The same is true of many right wing blogs. Small Dead Animals in Canada, and frankly, LGF (sorry, 'tis true).

Somehow we have to support the good, weed out the bad, and not toss them all in the same junk heap.

Tough to do, but necessary.

93 Dave the.....  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:30:19pm
Bill Clinton Rips into Moon Bats

[Link: [Link: www.liveleak.com...]...]

Yeah, I was watching that channel and they did the tease to the story...then my phone rang and I missed it. Yes, even the Clintons are being stalked by the truthers.

94 Randman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:30:19pm

re: #80 Pro-Bush Canuck

1.Our government sure as heck knew about the millions starved to death in the Ukraine.

2.How will overwhelming conventional force matter if 51% of Europe is radical Muslims?

95 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:30:25pm

Anyways, the final litmus test for me is how a group treats Jews.

That usually break any tie in my book.

~Norsk Troll

96 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:31:05pm

The only knowledge I have is from second cousins, via poor translations. I think there IS not viable conservative movement in Sweden, It is Left, More Left, and Incompetent.

This may be what passes for conservative. God help us all.

97 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:31:28pm

re: #63 Malatrope

re: #53 EtNorskTroll

You could take off your clothes and run around the room naked again....OOOOPS!

*looks around*

"Ya think?"

Heh...

~ENT

98 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:31:35pm

re: #90 Dianna

Why not?

99 ointmentfly  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:31:35pm

re: #80 Pro-Bush Canuck

I have to disagree that we have 'overwhelming' power against a creeping disease taking over Europe especially given our liberal side willing to turn the other cheek to jihadis if it is a stick in the eye to the right in this country.

100 americanpundit  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:31:36pm
#92 june_july

According to Charles, Ekeroth was a rarity in his civil email. The others weren't.

101 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:31:44pm

re: #96 mama winger

I think that is basically the story for most of Europe.

102 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:32:12pm

re: #92 june_july

Somehow we have to support the good, weed out the bad, and not toss them all in the same junk heap.

Tough to do, but necessary.

Yup.

103 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:32:13pm
104 Sharmuta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:32:25pm

Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.

105 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:32:48pm

re: #74 ointmentfly

Evil fighting evil...it happens, but the outcome is usually worse for the innocent.

I think of the story from the Gulag, when the young jewish woman showed her broken, badly healed hands, and said, "These were from the Nazis," then turned, lifted her shirt, and displayed the scars and lumps and damage on her back, and said, "These were from the GRU."

106 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:32:48pm

re: #97 EtNorskTroll

...well, Charles appears to be busy analyzing documents, 'n stuff at the moment. Carpe Diem, bro.

107 3 wood  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:32:51pm

re: #76 Cognito


Good heavens, people.

The enemy of our enemy? What kind of trash is that?

I'll bail out of this joint in a hurry, if we start to think of Nazis -- or even the Nazi-ish -- as our friends.

I never thought I would be saying these words, but Cognito. I agree with you.

109 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:33:28pm

re: #76 Cognito

You, me, and Charles, I think.

110 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:34:12pm

re: #81 Maine's Michael

Jeez, living under Nazi overlords vs Muslim overlords. Tough call.

I think I would prefer the muslim overlords. More generally incompetent.

*Norsk Troll puts a loaded gun in his mouth, cocks the hammer back*

"Whah waf tha queftioon again, Michael?"

~ENT

111 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:34:16pm

re: #107 3 wood

NOT friends. Dirty swamp water, no?

112 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:34:24pm

re: #96 mama winger

Precisely. There is no other european response possible. Euopean society is like a rubber band. At this point, its pulled so far to the left that it can only snap back, overshooting on the right.

113 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:34:24pm

re: #87 Maine's Michael

Any policy statements in those docs about making the trains run on time?


I thought that Mussolini and the Fascisti.

114 lawhawk  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:35:04pm

re: #92 june_july

All the easier to sway with honey than vinegar.

115 pegcity  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:35:32pm

re: #77 Jewels (AKA Julian)

Bill Clinton Rips into Moon Bats

[Link: www.liveleak.com...]

Thats like getting yelled at by God to a lefty

116 J.S.  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:36:37pm

From one of the word documents, the Sweden Democrats point out that other political parties in Sweden also have their nazis. I think to really understand what's going on -- it would take many, many hours (weeks, months) of dedicated research and examination...and not just looking at the one party, the Sweden Democrat Party, but all the political parties. Get a sense of the whole political nexus. (Another problem is that this is a different culture. I've read and heard about some things which are -- hmmm, what's the word to describe it -- alien?) (I think some other poster here already mentioned this -- it's almost endemic, a kind of racialization (?) of their society...which is bound to be rather "off-putting" for North Americans...) Anyway, the nazi business i find very, very troubling...

117 jaggedskye  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:36:38pm

OT, way OT. But I have to share. Billy finally says something I can just agree with.

Why can't more of our leaders just do this.

118 Randman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:36:54pm

re: #115 pegcity

re: #77 Jewels (AKA Julian)

Bill Clinton Rips into Moon Bats

[Link: www.liveleak.com...]

Thats like getting yelled at by God to a lefty

No..Clinton is only a Saint as Vladimir Lenin is the moon bat god.

119 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:36:59pm

That cuts it.

"sub-cultural looks" = fucking SS uniform

I can't believe we are having this discussion. Joining up with nazis, even tame-looking stealth nazis? What the fuck? That is what comes from reckless talk about nuking Mecca and interning American Muslims.

There are millions of Muslims in Iraq who have joined up with US. I'll take them over these creeps any day.

120 yochanan  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:37:32pm

euroland is closer to having to fight the islmo fascists on there home turf. when the shit hits the fan you might not have the luxury to choose who stands beside you on the barricades.

During ww2 we ended up making common cause with Joe Stalin a man with the blood of millions on his hands.. we ended up on the same side with the devil because the monster snickelgrubber was much worse esp. in the short term.

You join a political party because you agree with it, you can join in a common front against common enemies with out agreeing to the ideas of everyone in that front. the capitalist west did not agree with Joe Stalin, Churchill esp understood we would be in a vast struggle with Stalin after the war, FDR was somewhat confused on that.

Remember just because someone is called fascist or Nazi does not mean they are, just look 4 different American presidents were called fascist, or Nazi by the moonbat left.

121 NJDhockeyfan  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:37:32pm

re: #52 Killgore Trout


For the 2004 election to the European Parliament, the party received 200,000 SEK from the Belgian anti-Semite Bernard Mengal.

Surfing around I found this interesting page.

Bernard Mengal

122 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:37:37pm

re: #85 Jimmah

Published in 2003?

I can read code-words better than most, and my scalp is crawling, and my hair is literally trying to stand on end. Which, given my hair, is quite a sight.

Thanks, Jimmah.

That's it. They're classic mystic nationalists, which morphs, on three rousing speeches, into pogroms.

123 Texas Joel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:37:42pm

re: #80 Pro-Bush Canuck

re: #75 Randman

1. We didn't know how evil the Soviet Union was.

Yes we did.
They had just recently had been Nazi allies.

124 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:37:58pm

What I DO know is that Sweden is losing itself in a sea of bad decisions, stretching over decades. Come-and-get-it welfare, open immigration, low birth rates among its citizens, high birth rates among its muslim population, and the radical decline of towns such as Malmo. Places that even the police will not go.

In Sweden, the schools teach the children that being Swedish is bad. Being a world citizen is good. The people are having a reaction to the loss of their culture and their heritage. What does it mean to be Swedish? Is there a community? Or are there merely taxpayers and leaches?

Swedes are waking up and deciding that it may be a good thing to be Western, to be Swedish, to be European. They do not wish to be over run with lowlifes rioting and demanding Sharia.

Can you blame them?

The question is - is there something salvageable here? And who will save it?

125 m  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:38:14pm

Ed of many babies

I would think Bat Ye'or and Robert Spencer would be aware of the company they keep. On the other hand, I doubt they vetted every participant.

Robert Spencer said he did not vet everyone that would be there, and was meeting most for the first time.

#92 june_july

The same is true of many right wing blogs. Small Dead Animals in Canada, and frankly, LGF (sorry, 'tis true).

Uhm- Islam isn't a race. (sorry, but it's true).

126 3 wood  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:38:41pm

re: #32 ointmentfly

Maybe we ought to adopt the old arab adage - the enemy of my enemy is my friend - with regard to the possible skinhead wing of the party. What are the chances they would have time to mobilize against the Jews when they will obviously have their hands full with the tidal wave of your muslims....?

No how.

No way.

127 doriangrey  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:38:51pm

Warning off topic rant:

Whoooppppeeee.....They have just lifted the mandatory evacuation notice here in Ramona.

128 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:40:02pm

re: #123 Texas Joel

Sorry. As I said above, not responding any more on this topic. Makes me ill.

129 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:40:11pm

re: #92 june_july

"It is likely that for some, even if they have anti-semitic inclination, the threat of the Jew has long since faded into irrelevance as Jews disappear from Europe, while the Muslim hordes continue to pour in."

I think it this is a a grave mistake in rationalization. Jewish threat isn't measured by their numbers, but instead by their mere existence.

130 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:40:37pm

re: #98 Maine's Michael

Beer, a diet heavy on carbs, and age?

131 lawhawk  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:41:22pm

re: #119 Shiplord Kirel

Excellent point.

To be sure, there are plenty of Muslims who are joining up with us because they've got their own scores to settle with others (tribes, nations, ethnic groups, etc.) but there is no reason that we should need or choose to associate with folks who haven't truly distanced themselves from the neo-nazi fascist policies.

This really isn't passing the smell test.

132 joncelli  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:41:41pm

re: #86 Malatrope

No. No arguments to expediency are acceptable. When we make compromises with haters we get their stink on us.

133 Ma Sands  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:41:48pm

re: #127 doriangrey

Good to hear there is progress.....I heard on the radio today, 14,000 homes gone, and 8 dead with more expected to be found so.....

134 americanpundit  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:42:32pm
#131 lawhawk

Agreed.

135 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:42:46pm

This whole white supremacy thing - it worries me that Europe may accept such nonsense. I just don't see how it can fly in the USA, except in the lunatic fringe. Virtually everyplace I go is multi-racial.

Don't Europeans mix? Americans - at least where I live - mix. Heck, my family's mixed. If not a melting pot, we're certainly a stew. You can't unmake a stew.

136 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:43:07pm

re: #124 mama winger

What I DO know is that Sweden is losing itself in a sea of bad decisions, stretching over decades. Come-and-get-it welfare, open immigration, low birth rates among its citizens, high birth rates among its muslim population, and the radical decline of towns such as Malmo. Places that even the police will not go.

In Sweden, the schools teach the children that being Swedish is bad. Being a world citizen is good. The people are having a reaction to the loss of their culture and their heritage. What does it mean to be Swedish? Is there a community? Or are there merely taxpayers and leaches?

Swedes are waking up and deciding that it may be a good thing to be Western, to be Swedish, to be European. They do not wish to be over run with lowlifes rioting and demanding Sharia.

Can you blame them?

The question is - is there something salvageable here? And who will save it?


Great synopsis mw, with an even better question poised.

137 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:43:09pm

The Stalin analogy doesn't apply in this situation. This is activism, not war, at least for now. If it comes to these weird ex-but-not-really-Nazis fighting AQ in the streets, then we can make an alliance of necessity, not before.

138 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:43:43pm

re: #135 Catttt

Swedes marry Swedes. That's my experience. Once in a while, maybe a Norwegian gets thrown into the mix. Not too often.

139 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:43:47pm

My opinion so far: the hackles are still raised. Maybe even more.

140 joncelli  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:43:58pm

re: #92 june_july

Can you point me to a white supremicist on LGF? I know of no such lizardoid.

141 lawhawk  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:44:14pm

re: #120 yochanan

That was a deal with the devil that I don't think many would choose to make again. Sometimes recognizing evil and lesser evils means not doing business with either.

142 3 wood  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:44:29pm

I'm missing posts 61 through 108 on my screen for some weird reason, so I'm sorry if anybody said anything to me and I've not responded.

143 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:44:29pm

Hey Charles,

You got a link from Glenn on Instapundit...

Feeling an Instalanche yet?

144 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:44:31pm

re: #119 Shiplord Kirel

Charles is playing fair. They asked us to take a look. We have.

I just got a look at my reflection in one of my windows; you think it's only a metaphor, "hair raising", but it's not. Jimmah's link is just freaking revolting.

145 americanpundit  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:44:44pm
#139 Charles

Yeah, I'm just not believing their literature.

146 doriangrey  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:45:06pm

re: #133 Ma Sands

I heard on the radio today, 14,000 homes gone,

I believe its 1400...

147 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:45:37pm

Veterans Cemeteries ban flag folding ritual.


I smell the stink of the RoP on this...

(AP) RIVERSIDE Flag-folding recitations by Memorial Honor Detail volunteers are now banned at the nation's 125 veterans graveyards because of a complaint about the ceremony at Riverside National Cemetery.

During thousands of military burials, the volunteers have folded the American flag 13 times and recited the significance of every fold to survivors.

The first fold represents life, the second a belief in eternal life, and so on.

The complaint revolved around the narration in the 11th fold, which celebrates Jewish war veterans and "glorifies the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob."

The National Cemetery Administration then decided to ban the entire recital at all national cemeteries. Details of the complaint weren't disclosed.

148 stevieray  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:45:55pm

re: #96 mama winger

Yep. My cousin married a Swedish woman and moved there about 15 years ago. According to his description of the place, Joe Liebermann would be considered a right winger! The level of p.c. is stifling, most people don't express their true feelings in public... and rarely in private too! Apparently they have a long history of obsessive conformity... a trait that has been exploited masterfully by the multi-culti left.

149 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:46:13pm

I dunno.

Read #1 and #6. So, ... is it necessary to make a judgement, take a position? They seem reasonable, ... mostly harmless.

150 Randman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:46:32pm

re: #137 Shiplord Kirel

The Islamofascist have said in speeches over and over there will be no need to fight in the streets of Europe as the demographics and time will give them their victory.

151 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:46:40pm

re: #138 mama winger

re: #135 Catttt

Swedes marry Swedes. That's my experience. Once in a while, maybe a Norwegian gets thrown into the mix. Not too often.

I'm just so used to the descendants of tired, poor, huddled masses, breathing free. Remember that I am an American commercial after 9/11? Like that. I'm glad I'm American.

152 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:46:42pm

re: #124 mama winger


The question is - is there something salvageable here? And who will save it?

I have always thought that Europe is in a tough spot but could survive. However, their reversion to Nazism makes me think that maybe it's not worth saving afterall.

153 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:46:45pm

re: #124 mama winger

An excellent question. But I fear that it's always up to the people standing on the ground.

154 Ma Sands  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:46:52pm

re: #146 doriangrey

Oh! I hope so!

155 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:47:22pm

re: #140 joncelli

I don't think there are any such people here either. I think there were a few posts that were perhaps ill-considered and not really thought through. Or perhaps just misunderstood.

The thing is most of us here have a lot of Jewish friends--many of us here ARE Jewish--and about the only thing in the world worse than a jihadist for us is a Nazi.

The Nazis killed more people in a few years than Arab Muslims have in a century or more.

156 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:47:40pm

re: #148 stevieray

Apparently they have a long history of obsessive conformity.

Yes - with a healthy dose of arrogance thrown in for good measure. I hate it when my Swedish relatives visit America. They are insufferably superior.

157 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:47:52pm

There are no "white supremacists" at LGF, and if I ever discover any, they'll be kicked out so fast their teeth will stay behind.

158 zygazint  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:48:02pm

re: #125 m

Uhm- Islam isn't a race. (sorry, but it's 'tis true). ( fixed that for ya)

159 jeppo[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:48:09pm
160 J.S.  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:48:17pm

re: #132 joncelli

Speaking of expediency -- I was reading about the Conservative Party in the UK -- and it appears that the Conservative Party leader is taking a page out of the Liberal Handbook, and has newly "discovered" the "value" in cozying up to radical Imams...Apparently the "Conservatives" think that they can muster a few more votes by appealing to the "minority" immigrant communities in the UK. (I think this also drives people to those fringe parties.)

161 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:48:42pm

I have only read the first document, but, IMO if a group is anxious to disassociate itself from a checkered past, they actually do something really simple about it, like change their name.

When I see Nazi uniforms, sorry...no excuse. Period. End of sentence.

162 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:48:52pm

But I think I know what raises Charles' hackles, it seems a little *too* harmless, stuff like that won't really hold an organization together.

But maybe it isn't, y'know, this isn't that big an organization, and that's part of why it isn't that big an organization.

163 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:49:09pm

re: #135 Catttt

I just don't see how it can fly in the USA, except in the lunatic fringe.


Atlas is on board with them with no reservations, I see a few people here who aren't repulsed and there are probably a lot more supporters who are lurking and staying out of it. It can happen here. It might be happening here at this very moment.

164 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:49:54pm

Not conviinced, particularly in the face of what has already been presented here - and I've given these pieces more time, frankly.

Charles expressed some misgivings about the organization, and in rebuttal they point him (us) to stuff from their own blog to refute his concerns, which amount to

"Are not."

165 stevieray  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:49:56pm

re: #120 yochanan

Good points.

166 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:49:57pm

re: #159 jeppo

Anyone who disagrees, please tell us exactly which Swedish political party anti-jihadists should support instead.

And there's the problem right there. No good alternatives.

167 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:50:17pm

re: #149 itellu3times

Go look at Jimmah's link.

168 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:50:18pm

It comes down to this: I don't hate all Muslims. I do hate all Nazis. Case closed.

169 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:50:24pm

Killgore,

Yes. Some of the comments on this thread have been revelatory.

170 JeremyR  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:50:35pm

re: #139 Charles

My opinion so far: the hackles are still raised. Maybe even more.

Nazi's aren't entirely useless, we can stick them on the 100 meter line at Pendelton.

171 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:51:17pm

re: #157 Charles

We could make a necklace.

172 americanpundit  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:51:53pm
re: #159 jeppo

If I had to choose between Sheehan and Kucinich, I'd stay home.

173 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:01pm

re: #151 Catttt

My family tends to marry anyone coming down the pike at the right time. It's rather disconcerting, when you start trying to research people only two or three generations back; they're not who you think.

174 pegcity  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:05pm

re: #152 Killgore Trout

re: #124 mama winger


The question is - is there something salvageable here? And who will save it?

I have always thought that Europe is in a tough spot but could survive. However, their reversion to Nazism makes me think that maybe it's not worth saving afterall.

Genocide is in there blood, just look how they act during their precious soccer matches, like animals. That is the true Angry 2 millenia of Hatred Europe that exists below the surface of there multi culti bullshit facade.

175 Pro-Bush Canuck  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:05pm

re: #166 mama winger

If there are no good alternatives that STILL doesn't mean you vote for Nazis.

I'm having trouble believing I'm typing these posts on LGF...

I think I need a break.

176 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:18pm

The question for me is: Will the Europeans fight back? Have they become fatigued and morally decayed? For example, the same question could apply to Israel: Do they have the will to continue the fight?

France elected Sarkozy, which gave me a glimmer of hope, but now you have nationwide strikes because he wants them to work 30 minutes more a week and donate a couple of bucks a year to their pensions.

Are these the same people who are going to fight off their muslim masses?

177 Ma Sands  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:34pm

re: #148 stevieray

...most people don't express their true feelings in public... and rarely in private...


:) .....I know a missionary couple to Sweden....they've told me of that, and that it is an utterly Swedish thing....... :) --helped me to come to terms with that in my elderly friend who passed away without me being able to realize I had broken through to her heart..... :) --I re-read all our e-mails after talking with the couple, and, oh, my! --it stands out, if you know what to look for! :)

178 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:43pm

Had to step away for a bit, and now I'm Hopelessly Behind in this thread. I want to be clear that I am in no way advocating "getting along with", "working with", "espousing", or otherwise helping out neo-nazis. The phrase "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" is exceptionally misleading and simplistic. A better way to put it is that the enemy of my enemy can be a useful tool for a time. That is all I'm trying to say.

The Greeks stood on their principles, and were demolished. I'd hate to see us do the same.

In the context of this particular discussion, the original issue was letting these groups "help" with the conference. That was a mistake. But I believe it would be equally a mistake to tell them to stop being anti-Jihadist...

Just ignore the bastards. If they're a problem after we figure our way through this gawdawful Perverted Islam apocalypse, we can deal with them then. The mistake we made in WWII, after we made common-cause with the Soviets, was in not draining the swamp afterwards. Like Patton, I wouldn't have danced on the table with them in the bar, either.

179 Josephine  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:52pm

I hope I'm not speaking out of turn when I say this. My memory of history is not excellent. If I am mistaken, please correct me.

This situation reminds me of the U.S. (and possibly other countries) making alliances with former Nazis at the end of the Second World War in order to fight Communism.

When I first heard this, I was horrified that many Nazis were allowed to flee Germany without prosecution. It was explained to me that the war had been won, the Nazis had been defeated and the war against Communism took precedence over punishing some former Nazis who might be useful.

Now it seems that some political groups with former and possibly current neo-Nazi connections are involved in the fight against Islamization. Some people are saying, "Look, it's in the past" or, "Hey, it's not that bad, you don't understand Europe" and ignoring or not acknowledging the unpleasant Nazi associations to focus on the fight against jihad. Others are saying, "Nazis are Nazis, and the balance of proof that these groups have changed is not significant enough for me to ignore this".

I'm in the latter group. It's one thing to say you've changed but, once trust is lost, it's hard to regain it. Finding out about neo-Nazi or skinhead origins in a group is enough to turn me off permanently because if I were running a group, those folks would be shown the door immediately and told to stay out in no uncertain terms. If I belonged to a group that knowingly permitted openly neo-Nazi or skinhead followers to join and participate, I would quit the group immediately.

We all draw the line somewhere.

180 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:54pm

re: #151 Catttt


I'm glad I'm American.

Me too. I thank God every day.

181 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:52:54pm

Let's see, you post criticism of a any politician and the politician responds.

/do you expect the politician to admit to or agree with the criticism?

182 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:53:19pm

re: #74 ointmentfly

re: #55 Killgore Trout

I can't disagree with that, but when I see the enormity of the Jihadis sweeping Europe with their own vile hatred of western values, I wonder what besides an equivilent evil can beat it back?

After this comment, you're not welcome at LGF. There may be another site where you can ally yourself with an "equivalent evil."

183 Randman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:53:36pm

re: #140 joncelli

re: #92 june_july

Can you point me to a white supremicist on LGF? I know of no such lizardoid.

Maybe a few green supremist. ;)

184 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:53:45pm

re: #121 NJDhockeyfan


The inevitable conclusion being that the Sverigedemokraterna think it perfectly reasonable to take money from antisemites or extremists as long that they are not well known. Which, in the end, is what they did.


Heh.

185 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:54:07pm
The Sweden Democrats and Vlaams Belang are probably two of the most pro-Israel parties in Europe.

Certainly does Israel no favors.

Quite the contrary.

186 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:54:41pm

re: #175 Pro-Bush Canuck

If there are no good alternatives that STILL doesn't mean you vote for Nazis.

Of course not. You develop other alternatives.

I am not sure if the Swedes, or greater Europe for that matter, can do this fast enough to make a difference. In fact, I am almost positive that they cannot.

187 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:55:04pm

re: #157 Charles

kicked out so fast their teeth will stay behind.

/I've seen that happen in cartoons before

188 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:55:23pm

re: #159 jeppo

How would we know? We're Americans, and we don't really know much about Swedish politics. We're reading documents, and they make us uncomfortable.

It's up to the Swedes to figure this conundrum. We can't. All we can do is decide if we're really willing to swallow what we're reading right this instant.

As for me, the answer is, No.

189 joncelli  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:55:25pm

re: #160 J.S.

Alas, the Tories are lost. They haven't been a real conservative party since John Major replaced Thatcher.

190 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:55:48pm

I like the fact that Charles has given these people a say...and I like the fact that they would take the tme and effort to speak in their own defense.

191 Milk Toast Intolerant  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:55:51pm

re: #92 june_july

I dunno. It is striking that they have contacted Charles in a civil manner, offered information in whatever manner, and not ranted and raved like lunatics usually do.

It is likely that for some, even if they have anti-semitic inclination, the threat of the Jew has long since faded into irrelevance as Jews disappear from Europe, while the Muslim hordes continue to pour in.

I am keeping an open mind. I am a member at Brussels Journal too, and there is a mix there of really fine people, obvious racists and anti-semites, and white-supremacists.

The same is true of many right wing blogs. Small Dead Animals in Canada, and frankly, LGF (sorry, 'tis true).

Somehow we have to support the good, weed out the bad, and not toss them all in the same junk heap.

Tough to do, but necessary.

I don't mean to take this on a small tangent, but if you are implying there are racists, anti-semites, and white-supremacists at LGF, I would be interested to know who they are. I have been reading this blog for about three years now and have yet to encounter those types of people. Charles does a very good job of banning those types, so if they were once here, they aren't anymore.

192 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:55:55pm
193 hayseed  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:56:05pm

re: #174 pegcity

re: #152 Killgore Trout


re: #124 mama winger

The question is - is there something salvageable here? And who will save it?

I have always thought that Europe is in a tough spot but could survive. However, their reversion to Nazism makes me think that maybe it's not worth saving afterall.

Genocide is in there blood, just look how they act during their precious soccer matches, like animals. That is the true Angry 2 millenia of Hatred Europe that exists below the surface of there multi culti bullshit facade.

equating your average football fan in Europe to a few hooligans is using a pretty broad brush

194 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:56:15pm

re: #163 Killgore Trout

re: #135 Catttt


I just don't see how it can fly in the USA, except in the lunatic fringe.

Atlas is on board with them with no reservations, I see a few people here who aren't repulsed and there are probably a lot more supporters who are lurking and staying out of it. It can happen here. It might be happening here at this very moment.

Some, yeah. However, I think they trip on over to the looney fringe if they know and accept it anyway. I just don't think it will fly. I hope I'm right.

195 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:56:29pm

re: #178 Malatrope

The Greeks stood on their principles, and were demolished. I'd hate to see us do the same.


Wow.

196 zygazint  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:56:52pm

re: #121 NJDhockeyfan


The inevitable conclusion being that the Sverigedemokraterna think it perfectly reasonable to take money from antisemites or extremists as long that they are not well known. Which, in the end, is what they did.

/money quote

197 stevieray  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:56:53pm

re: #156 mama winger

re: #148 stevieray

Apparently they have a long history of obsessive conformity.

Yes - with a healthy dose of arrogance thrown in for good measure. I hate it when my Swedish relatives visit America. They are insufferably superior.

Really? When I was young, my cousins and I shared a house, and he visited Sweden a few times. He must have invited the entire country to come visit him (and consequently me too), and many took him up on it. For the two years we shared the house, we must have had 20 different Swedes stay with us... usually for a month of more!

They all seemed friendly, and we always had a good time. Of course, half of them were 20 year old Swedish women... that may have clouded my judgement. :D

198 Stonemason  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:57:14pm

re: #163 Killgore Trout

re: #135 Catttt


I just don't see how it can fly in the USA, except in the lunatic fringe.

Atlas is on board with them with no reservations, I see a few people here who aren't repulsed and there are probably a lot more supporters who are lurking and staying out of it. It can happen here. It might be happening here at this very moment.

I had been lurking and staying out of it, 'cause I don't know the start of this discussion, I am assuming someone rubbed elbows with these groups, then I remember a thread attempting to distance LGF from the groups, then flames...
Anyway, I do not live in Sweden, therefore I can not pass judgment on a Swedish Political Party. I can't join it, I can't support it, and I sure as heck can't stop anyone else from being a part of it.
/back to lurking

199 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:57:17pm

re: #195 Killgore Trout

re: #178 Malatrope

The Greeks stood on their principles, and were demolished. I'd hate to see us do the same.

Wow.

Not even worth the effort.

200 segesta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:57:19pm

>>They are insufferably superior.

I only recently read any Swedish history, and indeed the Swedes were The Germans before the Germans were The Germans. If you get my drift.

But they make a mean elk steak.

201 lawhawk  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:57:22pm

In the prior thread, we were busy going on after Ron Paul for his connections to neo-Nazi/white supremacists/conspiracy loons, and here we're supposed to ignore those kinds of connections because there is something of a common cause against the Islamists?

Sorry, but I don't see how you can do that.

202 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:57:24pm

re: #194 Catttt

re: #163 Killgore Trout


re: #135 Catttt

I just don't see how it can fly in the USA, except in the lunatic fringe.

Atlas is on board with them with no reservations, I see a few people here who aren't repulsed and there are probably a lot more supporters who are lurking and staying out of it. It can happen here. It might be happening here at this very moment.

Some, yeah. However, I think they trip on over to the looney fringe if they know and accept it anyway. I just don't think it will fly. I hope I'm right.

Ahem. When I said "some, yeah" I meant in the USA - NOT here at LGF.

203 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:57:59pm

Thanks, Dianna, for pointing me back to Jimmah's link.
Please people, if you scrolled past this, go back and read it. If you know anything about the roots of Nazism, it will make your skin crawl.

204 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:58:31pm

re: #157 Charles

There are no "white supremacists" at LGF, and if I ever discover any, they'll be kicked out so fast their teeth will stay behind.

HAHA!

Funny...

~Norsk Troll

205 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:58:31pm

re: #155 Pro-Bush Canuck

The Nazis killed more people in a few years than Arab Muslims have in a century or more.

See post 81.

206 pegcity  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:58:34pm

Why can't there be i dunno normal political parties in Europe, why do they have to be either socialists or Right wing nutcases.

207 Milk Toast Intolerant  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:58:41pm

re: #74 ointmentfly

re: #55 Killgore Trout

I can't disagree with that, but when I see the enormity of the Jihadis sweeping Europe with their own vile hatred of western values, I wonder what besides an equivilent evil can beat it back?

No way! Either we defeat the Islamic head choppers by the righteousness of our cause, or we will die trying, but we will not align ourselves with any "equivalent evil."

208 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:58:46pm

re: #178 Malatrope

You express you position well, but I must, respectfully, disagree.

209 joncelli  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:58:51pm

re: #159 jeppo

And there's the problem. It's up to Swedes to take the responsibility to form parties that have no taint of racism and neo-naziism and yet still resist dhimmitude. It's a fine balance, but only Swedes of good intent can do it.

210 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:59:01pm

re: #92 june_july

I dunno. It is striking that they have contacted Charles in a civil manner, offered information in whatever manner, and not ranted and raved like lunatics usually do.

It is likely that for some, even if they have anti-semitic inclination, the threat of the Jew has long since faded into irrelevance as Jews disappear from Europe, while the Muslim hordes continue to pour in.

I am keeping an open mind. I am a member at Brussels Journal too, and there is a mix there of really fine people, obvious racists and anti-semites, and white-supremacists.

The same is true of many right wing blogs. Small Dead Animals in Canada, and frankly, LGF (sorry, 'tis true).

Somehow we have to support the good, weed out the bad, and not toss them all in the same junk heap.

Tough to do, but necessary.

This is an incredibly offensive post. Racists, antisemites, and white supremacists are NOT welcome at LGF, and if those are the kind of people you think you need to befriend, you're welcome to go elsewhere.

211 yochanan  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:59:44pm

we are farther away from this problem in America.

there are parts of euroland that are no go areas NOW. and these are growing.

please be careful who you call nazi or fascist as our POTUS is offen called both of these things by the left and we all know he is neither. If muslims in america started creating jihadist no go areas our views might change in who we talked to. groups like these may have some rational people who we should talk to if only to get them to start org. we can agree with. In places like sweden if you are pro israel some will call you racist and a nazi even if you are in reality far from both. all i am saying we should be careful in this

212 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 7:59:53pm

re: #197 stevieray

Really?

On the other hand, my Swedish relatives might be big jerks just because they're, well, big jerks : )

213 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:00:14pm

In fact, I'm making that decision easy for "june_july" and blocking its account.

214 Sharmuta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:00:28pm

re: #201 lawhawk

In the prior thread, we were busy going on after Ron Paul for his connections to neo-Nazi/white supremacists/conspiracy loons, and here we're supposed to ignore those kinds of connections because there is something of a common cause against the Islamists?

Sorry, but I don't see how you can do that.

Therein lies the rub. You've nailed it.

215 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:00:42pm

re: #199 Cognito

That's a very important sentiment and it's how the Nazis took Europe the first time. I've seen more than a few people state that they can keep the Jinni in the bottle while using it's "evil powers".

216 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:01:16pm

re: #203 Shiplord Kirel

Thanks, Dianna, for pointing me back to Jimmah's link.
Please people, if you scrolled past this, go back and read it. If you know anything about the roots of Nazism, it will make your skin crawl.

Ah HAH. Thanks.

217 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:01:32pm

re: #191 Milk Toast Intolerant

"The same is true of many right wing blogs. Small Dead Animals in Canada, and frankly, LGF (sorry, 'tis true). "

I think your stereotyping, profiling and labeling of LGF is not only untrue, but offensive and petty.

218 americanpundit  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:01:37pm
In its ideal form, such a society is therefore ethnically homogenous.

Holy cr@p! I didn't really read Jimmah's link before...

219 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:02:24pm

Again, in my opinion, the resurgence of neo-Nazis, even in Europe, probably isn't too likely. But associating with neo-Nazis, even for a good cause, like defending Europe from Islamism, makes it far too easy for the Islamists and their fellow travellers to dismiss anything said because it comes from people/groups associated with neo-Nazis.


Even if the leaders of the Swedish party aren't white supremacists or Nazis themselves, if the party's origins are from that area, or they still have a substantial number of 'white power' types, they have a problem.


Is there an anti-Islamist party in Sweden that doesn't have a strong association or history of racism? If there isn't, than perhaps the more reasonable members of the Swden Democrats need to start a new party that polices itself and keeps out the loonies.

220 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:02:30pm

re: #215 Killgore Trout

re: #199 Cognito

That's a very important sentiment and it's how the Nazis took Europe the first time. I've seen more than a few people state that they can keep the Jinni in the bottle while using it's "evil powers".

I know. It's both morally and logically wrong.

I'm glad to see that Charles seems to have the situation well in hand, though.

221 Sharmuta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:03:24pm

re: #217 ted

Milk Toast Intolerant didn't say that.

222 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:03:50pm

re: #199 Cognito

Aside from urging Malatrope to read the histories? I see that I forgot to do that.

223 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:04:33pm

re: #202 Catttt

We're talking about the same thing. It can happen here in the US. Vlaams was here this spring drumming up support. Altas/Pamela is a real person here in America who supports them. The Knuckleheads at Stormfront are real Americans who support them. Robert Spencer has defended them. European fascists have real world support in America.

224 Fried Spam  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:04:33pm

re: #2 MattMacD

"Tribal mentality"

I rarely post, but this phrase pushed one of my buttons. One of the things that I think is most wrong in the world today is what I'm calling 'tribalism'. Whether it's muslims vs. the kuffar, Sunni vs. Shia, or even democrats v. republicans, tribalism is all about the idea that "the worst of us is better than the best of you".

Original article

LGF post about the article

225 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:04:45pm

Hello. I don't have time to join in the discussion so much right now, but let me at least provide some background info. On the surface, Sweden is a peaceful democracy. In reality, it is a semi-totalitarian society. Opinion polls have revealed that two out of three Swedes doubt whether Islam can be combined with Swedish society. Yet not one party represented in parliament has been genuinely critical of the immigration policies.

According to Jonathan Friedman, an American Jew living in Sweden, “no debate about immigration policies is possible, the subject is simply avoided. Sweden has such a close connection between the various powerful groups, politicians, journalists, etc. The political class is closed, isolated.” The elites are worried to see their power slip away and therefore want to silence critics, for instance the Sweden Democrats, a small party opposed to immigration: “It is a completely legal party, they just aren’t allowed to speak. (...) In reality, the basis of democracy has been completely turned on its head. It is said: ‘Democracy is a certain way of thinking, a specific set of opinions, and if you do not share them, then you aren’t democratic, and then we condemn you and you ought to be eliminated. The People? That is not democratic. We the Elite, we are democracy.’ It is grotesque and it certainly has nothing to do with democracy, more like a kind of moral dictatorship.”

Before the elections in 2006, the established parties cooperated in boycotting the Sweden Democrats and other “xenophobic” parties. In one of numerous similar incidents, which extreme Leftists bragged about on the Internet, around 30 members of the SD were attacked during a peaceful, private party outside the town of Växjö. The brave “anti-Fascists” threw tear gas into the building, forcing people outside where they were beaten with iron bars and axes. Open, aggressive and sometimes violent harassment of critics of the country’s immigration policies has been going on for years, while the authorities have largely turned a blind eye to the problem.

Seemingly encouraged by the silence from the establishment to political violence, extreme Leftists have stepped up their attacks to include mainstream parties, such as the Centre Party’s offices in Stockholm. Newspaper Expressen warned against the “low-intensity terrorism,” but they were honest enough to admit that the extreme Leftists have tended to get away with their violence because it has been directed against the despised right-wingers. Political scientist Peter Esaiasson has done research into every election movement in Sweden since 1866. According to him, the organized attempts at disrupting meetings during the 2006 elections have no parallels in modern history.

[Link: www.brusselsjournal.com...]

The group Antifascistisk Action (AFA) openly brag about numerous attacks against persons who get their full name and address published on their website. According to them, this is done in order to fight against capitalist exploitation and for a global, classless society. Their logic goes something like this: If you protest against Muslim immigration, you suffer from Islamophobia, which is almost the same as xenophobia, which is almost the same as racism. And racists are almost Fascists and Nazis, as we all know, and they shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions in public. Hence, if you protest against being assaulted or raped by Muslims, you are evil and need to be silenced. If a native Swede is really lucky, he or she will thus first get mugged or battered by Muslims, and then beaten up a second time by his own extreme Leftists for objecting to being beaten the first time. The state does next to nothing to prevent either, of course. Native Swedes who object to a mass immigration that will render them a minority in their own country within a couple of generations have already been classified as "racists," and racists are for all practical purposes outside of the protection of the law.

226 Stonemason  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:05:11pm

re: #198 Stonemason

oh, and my personal belief, feeling if you will, is that if the time came to accept this group here in America, I would fight it. We do not have to accept this group, so
/back to lurking again

227 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:05:32pm

re: #219 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul


So What you are saying Ed is "guilty by association"; excellent point.

228 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:05:35pm

re: #74 ointmentfly

re: #55 Killgore Trout

I can't disagree with that, but when I see the enormity of the Jihadis sweeping Europe with their own vile hatred of western values, I wonder what besides an equivilent evil can beat it back?

Mmmmmmmmm~!

What's that delicious smell?

Smells like it's time for BBQ'ed troll, again!

/Yep: Trolls are cannibals.

*Chomp, slurp*

*Buuuuurp*

~Norsk Troll

229 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:05:48pm

re: #206 pegcity

Because the middle was destroyed by being called fascist by the left, and communist by the right, to say nothing of persecuted as such by each extreme.

Which is why I'd like a little more moderate language all around.

230 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:06:46pm

That whole "you must become evil to fight evil" argument is specious bullshit rationalization.

We must never ally with racists and racism, that's pretty simple. Two reasons:

1. Our enemies will pick the worst amongst us to represent us to the world. We don't want to become what Hooper wants to make us out to be.
2. It's just plain wrong, we are better than that, stronger than that, and smarter than that.

231 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:06:50pm

re: #208 Dianna

Well, thanks for that, and I respect that you (and others) disagree. In my opinion, the subject and the challenge is extremely complex, both tactically and strategically, and many pieces will be moved all over the chessboard before anything resembling "bringing this medieval death cult into modernity" can occur.

Please, I am not advocating allying with, being friends with, justifying the philosophy of, or supporting Nazi a$$holes. I know how ugly that history is. As I said earlier, I'm on Charles', not Pamela's side here. However, like too many military commanders have had to do over the last few thousand years, I feel there will come a time when we have to try to steer the enemies into each other's teeth.

The Greeks failed because they allowed pure democracy (their principles) to completely gridlock their decision-making capability. We shouldn't do the same. I've tried hard to explain how I feel, and I guess I'll leave it at that.

232 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:07:19pm

re: #223 Killgore Trout

re: #202 Catttt

We're talking about the same thing. It can happen here in the US. Vlaams was here this spring drumming up support. Altas/Pamela is a real person here in America who supports them. The Knuckleheads at Stormfront are real Americans who support them. Robert Spencer has defended them. European fascists have real world support in America.

I disagree on Robert Spencer. He said unequivocally that he denounces neo-Nazis. If you have a link where he says something different, I'd like to see it; I've emailed him and we're on the same page with these groups as far as I know.

233 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:07:26pm

re: #223 Killgore Trout

re: #202 Catttt

We're talking about the same thing. It can happen here in the US. Vlaams was here this spring drumming up support. Altas/Pamela is a real person here in America who supports them. The Knuckleheads at Stormfront are real Americans who support them. Robert Spencer has defended them. European fascists have real world support in America.

Well, darn it, it's not going to happen in my family - we're not all white!

I feel like act one of Cabaret.

234 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:07:54pm

re: #216 Catttt

Sigh. It's so nice to know that I'm invisible.

235 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:08:09pm

re: #225 Fjordman

Cutting to the chase:

Native Swedes who object to a mass immigration that will render them a minority in their own country within a couple of generations have already been classified as "racists," and racists are for all practical purposes outside of the protection of the law.

Point well taken. But if you object to mass immigration and put on a Nazi uniform, well...

236 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:08:24pm

re: #225 Fjordman


Now I'm confused again.

237 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:08:33pm

re: #210 Charles

re: #92 june_july

I dunno. It is striking that they have contacted Charles in a civil manner, offered information in whatever manner, and not ranted and raved like lunatics usually do.

It is likely that for some, even if they have anti-semitic inclination, the threat of the Jew has long since faded into irrelevance as Jews disappear from Europe, while the Muslim hordes continue to pour in.

I am keeping an open mind. I am a member at Brussels Journal too, and there is a mix there of really fine people, obvious racists and anti-semites, and white-supremacists.

The same is true of many right wing blogs. Small Dead Animals in Canada, and frankly, LGF (sorry, 'tis true).

Somehow we have to support the good, weed out the bad, and not toss them all in the same junk heap.

Tough to do, but necessary.

This is an incredibly offensive post. Racists, antisemites, and white supremacists are NOT welcome at LGF, and if those are the kind of people you think you need to befriend, you're welcome to go elsewhere.

Charles: I beginning to think it is the night of the long knives--in reverse.

Smells like the Kos kiddies or LGF Watch (sic) has activated a bunch of their "sleeper cells" to try and discredit you and/or smear your name....

Heads up....

Sure looks suspicious to me.

~Norsk Troll

238 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:09:39pm

Fjordman's here.

Now I gotta think more.

239 marjoriemoon  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:09:58pm

re: #122 Dianna

... Thanks, Jimmah. That's it. They're classic mystic nationalists, which morphs, on three rousing speeches, into pogroms...

Exactly. I'm not sure how long any nationalist party can distance itself from extremism. In fact, the Swedish Democrats were formed in 1988 and by 1991, it had Nazi supporters. That isn't to say that there aren't good people who would like to express their... say patriotism/nationalism, but not at the expense of others. I would suggest they find another party to express it.

240 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:10:25pm

#225

What a sad sate of affairs in Sweeden. God help us all!

241 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:10:34pm

re: #236 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul


Although they do seem to have a history. The thread earlier with the White Power flag, was that the Belgian group or the Swedish group. And which group had the woman in a Nazi uniform? Because either one is pretty damning.

242 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:11:21pm

Even though Sweden may be considered by many to be a small country it should be viewed very carefully. Its served as as a petri dish for many ideas which IMHO may have been put in place with good intentions but ultimately will end in failure.

243 formercorpsman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:12:00pm

Killgore, I am lurking.

I quite frankly have only followed this topic on the edges, as I am still reading up on stuff regarding the thread about the MEK, a book about modern day slavery by Sean O'Callaghan, (referencing words I am not familiar with in the book) and other things particular to home.

I know absolute power corrupts.

As far as the depth of knowledge you seem to have, I'll sit back and read the comments and learn more.

244 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:12:02pm

Fjordman -

From your perspective over there - what percentage of Swedes might be considered what we would call 'conservative'? Not neo-nazi. But common sense conservative. Do you have any idea?

Can they form a viable conservative party?

245 stevieray  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:12:23pm

re: #212 mama winger

re: #197 stevieray

Really?

On the other hand, my Swedish relatives might be big jerks just because they're, well, big jerks : )

Its probably an age related thing. They were young and on a big adventure... with no relatives around to report things back to Mom and Dad. Its pretty hard to be crabby when your twenty and "rich" Americans are buying you beer and taking you to clubs.

246 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:13:14pm

re: #225 Fjordman

Hence, if you protest against being assaulted or raped by Muslims, you are evil and need to be silenced.

That's not what we're talking about here. Just like not everyone who peaks out against radical Islam is a Nazi, not every one who's a called a Nazi is an innocent framed by socialists. The Sweden Democrats have a Nazi racist past that continues to this day. It still exists and is easily documented.

247 Sharmuta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:13:19pm

re: #225 Fjordman

Thank you for this post. It's very telling. The only anti-immigration party in Sweden has it's foundations built on nazism. That should tell you something.

248 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:13:29pm

re: #241 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul

re: #236 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul


Although they do seem to have a history. The thread earlier with the White Power flag, was that the Belgian group or the Swedish group. And which group had the woman in a Nazi uniform? Because either one is pretty damning.


The white power flag was the Belgian group, and a fairly recent image iirc. The Nazi she-wolf was from the Swedish group and that one is fairly old, from the early 90s or so.

249 DesertSage  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:14:03pm

re: #225 Fjordman

Holy crap Fjordman, what's happening in Sweden is a microcosm of what's happening here.
The Fascist Leftists are silencing the free speech of anyone who dissents from their world view, especially Conservatives.

The violence that you described an the hands of the Fascists Leftists in Sweden is just starting to happen here.

250 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:14:12pm

re: #225 Fjordman

So, essentially, the middle has been destroyed? Or at least silenced?

Just peachy. This is what happens when you insist that labels are more important than individuals.

251 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:14:15pm

re: #244 mama winger

Now that is the right way to go about changing Europe. Don't try to change existing groups, but encourage the formation of new ones.

252 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:15:07pm

Re: the Neo-Nazi's & Socialist Fascists

"The Enemy of My Enemy...Is Still My Enemy". Sorry, no alliance with Fascists, thank you. I got my family out of Europe several years ago because we saw what was coming now. Never Again.

253 GregInSeattle  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:15:21pm

OT-

I went to attend the Michael Medved event at the University of Washington tonight, but I was too late to get in the lecture hall. Last time Medved was on campus, there were less than 300 or so people there. This time, there must have been well over 1,000. It didn't occur to me that it might be that crowded. Nothing too exciting to report other than the "Stop Bombing Muslim Women" signs and about 25% of the crowd waiting outside the hall were Muslim. Seemed peaceful for the most part. I left after about 15 minutes waiting outside the hall. I wanted to be like Zombie, and get a good report and pics : ) *Sigh* maybe next time.

254 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:15:35pm

re: #232 Charles

I was referring to the same article, although he did disassociate himself from them and their views I do recall him saying they've cleaned up their act. I'll check the article again.......

255 americanpundit  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:16:16pm
re: #225 Fjordman

Hmm. Never really thought of Sweden like that...

256 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:16:21pm

re: #218 americanpundit

In its ideal form, such a society is therefore ethnically homogenous.
Holy cr@p! I didn't really read Jimmah's link before...

Well but it is Wikipedia, and isn't this what Charles has been referencing for two days now?

There's like no connection between these innocent docs and some of their past unsavory links and maybe some of their current doctrine. I don't know that ethnic homogeneity is harmful, tho I think the lesson from biology is that diversity is a very strong force, without being all politically correct about it.

So I'm not ready to register as a Swedish Democrat, but I'm willing to keep an eye on them, and if they can keep some bikini blondes out of burkas I'll count that as some kind of success.

257 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:16:31pm

I will never ally myself with fascists or neo-Nazis. Not now, and not ever. If we convince ourselves that this devil's bargain is the only way to win, we will have already lost.

258 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:16:51pm

[Link: conswede.blogspot.com...]

And should we encounter one of those less-than-ideal among our ranks, the right approach is to have a dialog with them, We are the many, and they are the few, so there's nothing to fear from such a dialog. And the really bad eggs won't show up at all. The bad eggs do not want to come to such an explicitly philo-Semitic conference as the Counterjihad summit we had in Brussels. They don't want to come to the conference featuring the strongly Zionist Aryeh Eldad, they want to go to Ahmadinejad's Holocaust Denial conference. These two groups are mutually exclusive. The magnetic metal is aligning itself. The neo-Nazis do not want to touch us with a ten-foot pole. So this is completely a non-issue. Our very positions protect us from their presence. But surely there will be less-than-ideal people to be found while the movement is growing. Most people still only have an intuitive idea of that something is wrong, and carry many confused concepts within (due to the smokes and mirrors of the political theater). They will need to be educated. Dialog is a good idea, ostracism a bad one.

(*) Update: Maybe I'm unfair to Jörg Haider comparing him to David Duke above. I could just as well have compared him to Nancy Pelosi, visiting Syria in support of the same dictatorial thug, Bashar al-Assad, as David Duke. Where Nancy Pelosi caused much more damage with her visit than David Duke did. And unlike Duke she actually met with Bashar al-Assad. Yes, Nancy Pelosi would perhaps have been a better comparison. Nevertheless, they are all equally useless in opposing the threat from Islam: Jörg Haider, David Duke and Nancy Pelosi.

259 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:16:54pm

Where's Truumax the Swede?

Probably sleeping - time difference. He might be able to give us some more info.

260 Catttt  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:17:21pm

re: #234 Dianna

re: #216 Catttt

Sigh. It's so nice to know that I'm invisible.

It's not that! I do read your posts. OK - now I have to admit - I was reading from the bottom of the thread.

261 J.S.  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:17:37pm

I recall (some years ago) a big ruckus caused in (was it the Netherlands?) and it was about children who had been born during WWII -- but they had been the product of "breeding" (by the SS). Now, I would have thought, well these poor, unfortunate children -- they were orphans -- and I thought these "civilized" people in the Netherlands (after being liberated, etc.) would have treated these children very well. To my shock I found out that "no" -- these children (due to their "genetics"? "race?") were hideously treated, cruelly shunned, ridiculed and abused (it was somehow assumed that the children had "nazi blood" and were thus "tainted."). As adults they had finally obtained the courage to come forward and, I believe they were asking for some form of compensation (they too felt themselves to be victims of WWII.) It was a kind of reverse racism (blond, blue-eyed orphans being spat at) -- but I kept thinking -- "how much have things really changed?" o well, different culture (?)

262 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:17:46pm

I think the leadership of the two parties is trying to reform, but neither hard enough nor fast enough for me.

[Link: www.ireland.com...]

263 yochanan  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:17:47pm

re: #225 Fjordman

you see the same sort of thing in america were the left attacks conserative meetings and speakers, the ave person doesn't do the attacking but they don't do anything to prevent it. this esp happens in the part of society that liberal/left controls the univeristies, and skools (mispelled by choice)

264 allahakchew  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:18:41pm

I just have a hard time with this and feel very uncomfortable.
I keep thinking back about the Muslim Brotherhood/Nazi connections that started years ago.

snip
Nazi Islam

Heinrich Himmler, Head of SS, and close colleague of Amin Al-Husseini, financed and established Islamic Institute (‘Islamische Zentralinstitut’) in Dresden under the Mufti. The purpose was to create a generation of Islamic leaders that would continue to use Islam as a carrier for Nazi ideology into the 21st century. [xxxv]

[Link: www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com...]

265 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:19:12pm

re: #243 formercorpsman

When did Sean publish anything new? The last book of his I'm aware of is from the late '60's?

His book on modern slavery was published in 1962 (?); has it been reissued? He had some really interesting stuff on the middle-east and northern Africa.

266 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:19:14pm

So the question is:

Will the Europeans either submit to Sharia and dhimmitude or start the Fourth Reich?

267 JeremyR  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:19:28pm

re: #210 Charles

re: #92 june_july


I dunno. It is striking that they have contacted Charles in a civil manner, offered information in whatever manner, and not ranted and raved like lunatics usually do.

It is likely that for some, even if they have anti-semitic inclination, the threat of the Jew has long since faded into irrelevance as Jews disappear from Europe, while the Muslim hordes continue to pour in.

I am keeping an open mind. I am a member at Brussels Journal too, and there is a mix there of really fine people, obvious racists and anti-semites, and white-supremacists.

The same is true of many right wing blogs. Small Dead Animals in Canada, and frankly, LGF (sorry, 'tis true).

Somehow we have to support the good, weed out the bad, and not toss them all in the same junk heap.

Tough to do, but necessary.


This is an incredibly offensive post. Racists, antisemites, and white supremacists are NOT welcome at LGF, and if those are the kind of people you think you need to befriend, you're welcome to go elsewhere.

I was blown away when I read J-J's post. Jews a threat? The jews in Europe tended to keep to themselves. In the centuries of recorded history there has never been an occasion of Jews going on a rampage and attacking, destroying and killing. OK, maybe one, Ludgh (sp) Ghetto when they fought back against the nazi deportations.
The jews were feared because they kept to themselves, stuck together and got rich from it. Divers laws, we don't charge each other interest like we would an outsider.
Yes the Jews are mostly gone from Europe. Millions killed, more deported. Heck, the Palistidiots looked benign compared to What they had just been through.

268 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:19:47pm

re: #258 Fjordman

Non Issue?

[Link: www.expo.se...]

This photo is from 2002. Still party members or not Fjordman?

269 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:20:56pm

re: #248 Shiplord Kirel

Nazi uniformed female was from 1996, I think.

Though that post was Tuesday evening, so I better not swear to it.

270 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:21:26pm

re: #231 Malatrope

I feel there will come a time when we have to try to steer the enemies into each other's teeth.

Where I see the issue with this statement is that either of them win, freedom loses.

271 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:22:02pm

re: #232 Charles
Ok I stand corrected. Spencer was merely correcting factual inaccuracies from the CAIR press release.

272 formercorpsman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:22:12pm

re: #265 Dianna

Excellent, you know the book I'm reading.

It is the issue from 1962, and it was my preference to get one printed closer to that time frame.

When I was referencing modern day, I was contrasting it with time before the Civil War era.

The whole book is sad, but the part about the boys facing the circle inward is really depressing.

273 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:22:17pm

re: #267 JeremyR

I was blown away when I read J-J's post. Jews a threat?

Good pick up.

274 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:22:49pm

re: #249 DesertSage

Not yet. If I have my way, not ever.

And I've already got my blue belt, so I'm not going to have to just take it if someone tries to silence me.

275 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:22:57pm

re: #261 J.S.

I recall (some years ago) a big ruckus caused in (was it the Netherlands?) and it was about children who had been born during WWII -- but they had been the product of "breeding" (by the SS). Now, I would have thought, well these poor, unfortunate children -- they were orphans -- and I thought these "civilized" people in the Netherlands (after being liberated, etc.) would have treated these children very well. To my shock I found out that "no" -- these children (due to their "genetics"? "race?") were hideously treated, cruelly shunned, ridiculed and abused (it was somehow assumed that the children had "nazi blood" and were thus "tainted."). As adults they had finally obtained the courage to come forward and, I believe they were asking for some form of compensation (they too felt themselves to be victims of WWII.) It was a kind of reverse racism (blond, blue-eyed orphans being spat at) -- but I kept thinking -- "how much have things really changed?" o well, different culture (?)

It was Norway. The German word for it was Lebensborn:

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

~Norsk Troll

276 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:23:24pm

I am late to the thread, and will read it all. It has been bothering me since this was dragged up by Pamela....Sweden, which produced Raoul Wallenberg, also has another side. It is something that troubles me, as they did take in a number of Jews during the Holocaust, but at the same time, we have this: Sweden's Refusal to Prosecute Nazi War Criminals: 1986-2002

I have to admit that I do have bad feelings about Sweden because of this. I was reluctant to bring it up at first, but it is, in this case, part of the puzzle. It seems that some doth protest too much, as there were nazis in Sweden and the neo-nazis flourish..

277 ted  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:23:33pm

re: #267 JeremyR


"The jews were feared because they kept to themselves, stuck together and got rich from it. Divers laws, we don't charge each other interest like we would an outsider."

Really?

278 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:23:43pm

re: #261 J.S.

I think it was Norway.

It was OK to fuck with the Nazis. but not have children, I guess.

279 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:23:59pm

re: #272 formercorpsman

Yeah.

I'm a member of IAbolish, and have been for years. I hate slavery.

280 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:24:44pm
281 Sharmuta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:24:51pm

Like the leftists appeasing the islamists, aligning with neo-nazis will only get us killed last.

282 COINTELPROAgent  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:24:59pm

My two cents - judge the political party by it's supporters. Charles, beyond that if somebody doesn't agree tell them tough shit.

I hadn't heard of the Sweden Democrats before this, and it's not like Sweden is some important superpower, so why split hairs? To me it just isn't worth this endless argument.

Sweden Dems get a thumbs down from me.

283 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:25:01pm

re: #225 Fjordman

The longer the Swedish establishment ignores the problem, the more frustration and resentment there will be to fuel groups like Swedish Democrats and worse. Whether they are locked out of power or not, they will still exist and they will feed on the frustration and continue to grow.

The authorities, having lived in a quasi-totalitarian fantasy world, will be completely unable to cope when the breaking point is reached and the long-ignored frustration explodes into violence.

Europe is headed for round three of its homicidal nationalism. Fascists are responsible for their own conduct, of course, but the PC multi-cultists are largely to blame for giving them the opportunity.

284 Mr. Beamish  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:25:05pm

Now the Nazi collaborators shave their own heads...

285 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:25:06pm

We should consider ourselves lucky here in the U.S. that we still can argue over the various problems and their solutions, whereas in Sweden and other countries (e.g., Norway) it seems as though the leftist have totally taken over and stifled all discussion because they have all the answers to all the problems.

Of course, there's a down side for us due to the acrimonious tone to our national "discussions." And here's a good piece in Maclean's about it, entitled "The 'Cold Civil War' in the U.S." which is well worth perusing.

286 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:25:49pm

re: #268 Thanos

re: #258 Fjordman

Non Issue?

[Link: www.expo.se...]

This photo is from 2002. Still party members or not Fjordman?

Look likes Nazis to me. Wish I could read Swedish. But that is a 'sieg heil' salute, best I can tell. Sverigedemokraten Kim Högstedt med två kamrater inför valet 2002.

287 marjoriemoon  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:25:52pm

Are there any Jewish members of the Swedish Democrats?

That may give you your answer.

288 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:26:19pm

re: #30 taxfreekiller

Some one pass this link to BaBa Zee

[Link: www.thecapitolist.com...]

she should enjoy putting this out to the world
just so America gets the idea just how bad D.C. has become.

there are about 400 pages in the general fourm area,
mean mouthed little shits who work there and "We the People"
are paying them to talk about us like we are bugs.

From page 12: "Memo to America: We don't care what you have to say, especially when you write in about crazy stuff, write nasty things, and write all the time." Re: Dream Act.

289 Maine's Michael  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:26:41pm

When the PC pressure cooker explodes, look out!

/yet another analogy.

290 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:26:43pm

re: #36 m

re: #4 Kailen

When Palestinians kidnap Israeli soldiers and Hizbollah attacks army posts on Israeli soil it is clear that Israel should have the right to defend it self according the principle of self defense.

Not that one from the first one?

That statement is true and valid, regardless of who is saying it.

291 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:27:25pm

re: #260 Catttt

Whenever I do that, I end up replying to people who were well below wherever I started out!

And then I never, ever catch up.

Thanks, anyway, Cattt.

292 maddogg  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:27:30pm

I read all of the documents, and the Wikipedia. If the documents are legitimate, and sincere, The Sweden Democrats , on the surface at least, seem to espouse democracy and conservative values, including being at loggerheads with Islam. They openly denounced racism and anti- Semites, expressed support for Israel, and called Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist organizations. Whats not to like?

293 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:27:34pm
Thank you for this post. It's very telling. The only anti-immigration party in Sweden has it's foundations built on nazism. That should tell you something.

Look, if you think Bat Ye'or, Aryeh Eldad and others would join in with a bunch of neo-Nazis you have lost your marbles. As far as I can see, I'm the only person on this thread who was actually there at this now-famous conference. Nobody else was, including Charles. All participants liked the initiative, and Andrew Bostom held a lecture based on his forthcoming book The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism. To my surprise, I now find that this was a neo-Nazi hate party.

They must be getting soft these days....

294 Mich-again  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:27:50pm

If ever there was a post for a lizard to give a "plus" to, its Charles' post in 257.

295 Orde  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:28:28pm

ay, my head's spinning, am withholding judgment until do some research and sort out the info, but again am very impressed by how Charles is handling this, thanks for fair reporting.

296 Stonemason  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:28:46pm

re: #272 formercorpsman

re: #265 Dianna

Excellent, you know the book I'm reading.

It is the issue from 1962, and it was my preference to get one printed closer to that time frame.

When I was referencing modern day, I was contrasting it with time before the Civil War era.
The whole book is sad, but the part about the boys facing the circle inward is really depressing.

Great...I finished 'See no Evil', and am in the middle of Spencer's 'Guide', and now you go and reccomned another one. When am I actually gonna be able to work at work?

297 doriangrey  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:29:23pm

re: #190 kiwiviv

Yes, but sadly they have either chosen their words poorly or fortunately they accidentally let slip more of their true intentions than they realized. Like Charles their references to nationalism being an ethnic division disturbs me greatly. I have over the years argued with many racists, and to a man this has been a prevailing ideology with them.

Furthermore I tell you this as someone who lives in SoCal, not all the racists I have argued with have been white supremacist, they have all regardless of whether they were white supremacists, brown supremacists, yellow supremacists, red supremacists or black supremacists to a individual held very similar views on ethnic purity and the importance of it in nationalism.

Yea, this raises the hairs on the back of my neck as well. I for one have no intention of giving any kind shape or form of support to any organization that even remotely resembles Nazi's or supremacists. At this point in time I am not willing to condemn the Swedish Democrats, I just don't know enough about them, but neither am I will to endorse them either.

298 J.S.  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:29:34pm

re: #287 marjoriemoon

Ted Ekeroth is Jewish (he's been described by others as the "useful idiot.")

299 Kreuzueber Halbmond  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:29:56pm

OK, I'm stepping back after doing some more reading. I want to believe this group is only interested in preserving Swedish sovereignty and identity, which would be a good thing, but they need to put a lot more distance between themselves and the neo-Nazi types I see in some of the photos.

300 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:30:01pm

re: #270 Highrise

re: #231 Malatrope

I feel there will come a time when we have to try to steer the enemies into each other's teeth.
Where I see the issue with this statement is that either of them win, freedom loses.

In LOTR, someone asks if it wouldn't be nice if Isengard would fight Mordor and Gandalf replies, "The winner would emerge stronger than either and free from doubt." I've never completely understod that, but I often find it relevant.

301 Sharmuta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:30:01pm

re: #293 Fjordman

You're putting words in my mouth.

302 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:30:07pm

re: #288 canadianally

re: #30 taxfreekiller

Some one pass this link to BaBa Zee

[Link: www.thecapitolist.com...]

she should enjoy putting this out to the world
just so America gets the idea just how bad D.C. has become.

there are about 400 pages in the general fourm area,
mean mouthed little shits who work there and "We the People"
are paying them to talk about us like we are bugs.

From page 12: "Memo to America: We don't care what you have to say, especially when you write in about crazy stuff, write nasty things, and write all the time." Re: Dream Act.

Done!

303 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:30:10pm
Saying that Neo-Nazism may have a good cause because it may defend Europe is like saying that the Devil will send some to hell sooner rather than later.

I didn't say that.

I said I doubt they are much of a threat, but that they make it easier for Islamists and fellow travelers to label all who oppose sharia and jihad as racists. That is why we shouldn't associate with them.

Again, maybe the ones who oppose creeping sharia who aren't white power nuts need to form a new party and keep the nutcases out.

304 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:30:31pm

re: #96 mama winger

The only knowledge I have is from second cousins, via poor translations. I think there IS not viable conservative movement in Sweden, It is Left, More Left, and Incompetent.

This may be what passes for conservative. God help us all.

Hmmm. I just read Steyn's latest book and I was already feeling gloomy.

305 Cognito  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:30:49pm

What's interesting to me here -- and I think I've said enough about it otherwise -- is that this neo-Nazi mentality seems to be making a resurgence in northern Europe. Why?

I can only guess it's because Muslim immigration is a much more immediate issue, there. The people must have been conditioned to avoid taking a stand on principles -- objecting to a mentality, or an action -- and so, grasping for a way to articulate their fear, they find skin.

306 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:31:01pm

re: #257 Charles

Agreed completely. Perhaps I have a simplistic view of conflict, but if myself and two thugs are in an alley, and they start beating on each other, when the one that wins comes after me, he will be weaker. Doesn't say a darn thing about whether I agree with either one of them. I don't consider that a "devil's bargain".

That's the only thing I've been trying to make clear here tonight. I've scanned those documents, and I don't see anything there to put the hair back down on my neck either. I wouldn't want those guys in my neighborhood or country, and if they're already here, dammit, there's yet another thing we have to worry about.

And, thinking about it in terms of my latest metaphor, if I went over and helped pound one of the thugs, causing the other one to say, "how ya doing, bro, howsa 'bout a beer?"...then that person's perceptions would have to be instantly corrected.

I'm tired, and done. I hope I've made it clear that I have no particular tolerance for Nazis of any stripe, whether they are from Sweden or San Francisco.

307 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:31:05pm

re: #300 itellu3times

re: #270 Highrise

re: #231 Malatrope

I feel there will come a time when we have to try to steer the enemies into each other's teeth.

Where I see the issue with this statement is that either of them win, freedom loses.

In LOTR, someone asks if it wouldn't be nice if Isengard would fight Mordor and Gandalf replies, "The winner would emerge stronger than either and free from doubt." I've never completely understod that, but I often find it relevant.

Happened when Stalin defeated Hitler.

308 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:31:06pm

re: #293 Fjordman

I don't think anyone here would ever accuse you of being part of a neo-nazi hate party, Fjordman. I know you and respect you. It's just that we are trying very hard to sort out all this conflicting information.

I for one appreciate any information that will help me come to a good conclusion.

309 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:31:32pm

Bed time.

310 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:31:37pm

re: #281 Sharmuta

I'm feeling gloomy, so I'll say that I would not count on that.

Besides, I'm really bad at cheating first.

311 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:32:08pm

re: #293 Fjordman

Thank you for this post. It's very telling. The only anti-immigration party in Sweden has it's foundations built on nazism. That should tell you something.
Look, if you think Bat Ye'or, Aryeh Eldad and others would join in with a bunch of neo-Nazis you have lost your marbles. As far as I can see, I'm the only person on this thread who was actually there at this now-famous conference. Nobody else was, including Charles. All participants liked the initiative, and Andrew Bostom held a lecture based on his forthcoming book The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism. To my surprise, I now find that this was a neo-Nazi hate party.

They must be getting soft these days....

The initiative is necessary. I support the movement against the Islamization of Europe. But once again, I'm disturbed that no one is willing to discuss the problematic nature of some of the participants. Instead, they -- and you -- attack those who raise the issue and ask reasonable questions.

It's a devil's bargain, Fjordman. I thought you were smarter than this.

312 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:32:26pm

re: #282 COINTELPROAgent


it's not like Sweden is some important superpower,

Sweden carries a LOT of international clout at many levels (NGO's, UN, academic, Noble Prizes, etc., etc., etc.)

313 DesertSage  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:32:41pm

re: #274 Dianna

I was talking about how the Fascist Left are silencing dissent in general, not you in particular.

You, like me, will never capitulate to the Fascist/Leftist intimidation. But when David Horowitz can't even speak at a college that he was invited too because of Fascist/Leftist intimidation, then something has gone very, very wrong in our country.

These Fascist/Leftists remind me so much of the Nazi Brownshirts it's scary.

314 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:32:51pm

re: #112 Maine's Michael

re: #96 mama winger

Precisely. There is no other european response possible. Euopean society is like a rubber band. At this point, its pulled so far to the left that it can only snap back, overshooting on the right.

One of the many paradoxes of our foolish European cousins.

315 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:33:22pm

re: #270 Highrise

The idea is not to let either of them win, but it's ok if they weaken each other.

316 Shiplord Kirel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:33:30pm

re: #266 ted

So the question is:

Will the Europeans either submit to Sharia and dhimmitude or start the Fourth Reich?

Fourth Reich.
If it comes to a violent showdown, it will be over in a few weeks, the Muslims and other "outsiders" won't have a chance. For all their violent posturing, the Euro-Islamic "yoots" are very poor fighters. They survive now only because PC is paramount and they operate under its protection.

317 Randman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:34:09pm

re: #283 Shiplord Kirel

re: #225 Fjordman

The authorities, having lived in a quasi-totalitarian fantasy world, will be completely unable to cope when the breaking point is reached and the long-ignored frustration explodes into violence.
.

Well...its a good thing those bureaucrats disarmed the people first.

318 mama winger  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:34:18pm

I have to get to bed. Thank you all for a really informative night.

Sleep well, friends.

319 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:34:23pm

re: #300 itellu3times

That is a good point. I am making an assumption that they would emerge weaker, not stronger. This may be incorrect.

320 COINTELPROAgent  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:34:46pm

re: #312 Irene NYC

The NGO's are nice but the others I could do without :-)

321 J.S.  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:35:07pm

re: #275 EtNorskTroll

Ah, that's it! Thank you Norsk Troll!

322 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:35:29pm

Hatred is often a response to real or perceived powerlessness. The PC atmosphere that allowed the leftist-Islamist tyranny to reign unchecked has brought out the worst in some of those who would oppose it.

What to do? My suggestion is not to pay much attention to the skinheads, but to continue to do what we have been doing: to build a responsible opposition to the leftist-Islamist tyranny that is based on respect for the rule of law and for the Judaeo-Christian tradition. If we are strong and steadfast and set a good example, people will follow us instead of them.

323 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:36:10pm

re: #305 Cognito

Fjordman's posts reinforce what I've suspected for some time; the middle is gone in Northern Europe. It got beaten into silence.

324 Jimmy The Clam  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:36:23pm

Did anyone here bother to get a hold of Bat Ye'or and get her take on things at that meeting?

I agree with Fjordman, in that unless she were lied to or otherwise deceived about what these groups consisted of, she would know better than we would.
I just don't see Bat Ye'or willingly hanging out with Nazis for any reason.

325 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:36:39pm

re: #307 1389

But we didn't engage Stalin immediately after WWII. In fact, we let him have a great deal. Was Patton wrong in wanting to head East immediately after Berlin? How would history have turned out differently? I have heard this argued persuasively from both sides (would have been better, would have been worse).

326 DesertSage  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:36:54pm

re: #287 marjoriemoon

Are there any Jewish members of the Swedish Democrats?

That may give you your answer.

There are very few Jewish Republicans either. For some reason (which is beyond me) they seem to gravitate toward the Leftist Democrats here in America, so I don't think you'll get your answer there.

327 gamblor  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:36:59pm

Winston Churchill, regarding his policy toward Stalin:

"If Hitler were to invade Hell, I should find occasion to make a favourable reference to the Devil"
328 Akrav  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:37:10pm

these documents are telling us what we want to hear. Sometimes we must dig beyond the facade to understand the true intentions of such a party.

We must decide what is more indicative of the party's "nature" (for lack of a better word): The impression given off by its leaders, or that by its followers. (if only a select number).

The republican party probably has plenty of members who are so radically Christian that they believe all Jews should be converted or something like that. Despite this, we should not be alarmed about the whole of the republican party.

Conversely, if a good number of these Swedish democrats are "Nazis" and this is the reputation of the party, excusing the party on the claims that only a "few" misbehave and the leaders in control mean well does not make sense either.

or maybe we should decide between the lesser of two evils...

(The anti-British underground groups ('mahteret') in mandated "Palestine" had a splitting dilemma in the midst of WWII. Should they fight the Nazis and side with their enemies, the British, or continue to fight the British and indirectly help the Nazis? In the end the mainstream sector of the group decided to fight the worser evil, the Nazis and even cooperated with the British)

329 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:38:02pm

re: #303 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul

they make it easier for Islamists and fellow travelers to label all who oppose sharia and jihad as racists. That is why we shouldn't associate with them.

Spot on. When it's time for lefties to criticize, if everything about you isn't 150% above board, they'll go for the jugular.

/but then they'll still go for the jugular even if you are.

330 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:38:21pm

I've never been more glad to have been born an American than I am tonight.

331 avideditorla.com[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:39:14pm
332 Mich-again  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:39:40pm

I have said in these threads for a long time that Fjordman is a way too overly verbose panicky alarmist chicken littles defeatist. Did I mention overly verbose?

To me, all those words are a red flag of pretzel logic. Read VDH or Amir Taheri. Short concise essays that hit you over the head. Fjordman is 10,000 words of blah blah link link. yawn.

333 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:39:59pm

re: #311 Charles

re: #293 Fjordman

Thank you for this post. It's very telling. The only anti-immigration party in Sweden has it's foundations built on nazism. That should tell you something.

Look, if you think Bat Ye'or, Aryeh Eldad and others would join in with a bunch of neo-Nazis you have lost your marbles. As far as I can see, I'm the only person on this thread who was actually there at this now-famous conference. Nobody else was, including Charles. All participants liked the initiative, and Andrew Bostom held a lecture based on his forthcoming book The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism. To my surprise, I now find that this was a neo-Nazi hate party.They must be getting soft these days....

The initiative is necessary. I support the movement against the Islamization of Europe. But once again, I'm disturbed that no one is willing to discuss the problematic nature of some of the participants. Instead, they -- and you -- attack those who raise the issue and ask reasonable questions.

It's a devil's bargain, Fjordman. I thought you were smarter than this.

In Fjordman's defense, the facts are there with regard to Muslim anti-Semitism. There is indeed a long tradition - dating back to the Prophet - of Islamic anti-Semitism. Muslims were, in fact, enthusiastic participants in, and even instigators of, the Nazi holocaust. (disclaimer - I'm not Jewish myself, but I do have Jewish relatives, so this is something of a hot button issue with me.) I am very wary of this starting up again.

334 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:40:07pm

re: #293 Fjordman

They must be getting soft these days....

Yes, it appears they're putting on a friendly face and hiding their intentions in exchange for legitimacy and support from others in the anti-jihad movement.

335 marwan's daughter  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:40:14pm

re: #330 Charles

I second that.

336 NomadOfNorad  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:40:18pm

re: #261 J.S.

I caught the tail end of a show on that on History channel a few days ago. Utterly revolting.

337 Stonemason  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:40:22pm

re: #330 Charles

I've never been more glad to have been born an American than I am tonight.


I will come from behind my rock and second that!

338 Pelayo  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:40:37pm

I don't really see a contradiction. The intellectual roots of many of the European far right parties are in Fascist or ultra-nationalist movements with a notion of the nation-state as one based around homogeneous ethnic groups. Historically the European far right was anti-Semitic on account of the fact that the Jews were the most obvious group that diverged ethnically and religiously from the dominant group.

In contemporary times however the European Far right sees Muslims and other non-European immigrant groups rather Jews as as the primary "other" that threatens national identity, and thus they are tempering their historic anti-Semitism for the most part. They are also receiving support from middle class Europeans who resent the crime they associate with immigrants, and from working class Europeans who fear the threat to job security, and finally from people in general who view Islam as a threat to Europe, but don't see any alternatives in the mainstream political parties.

The best solution to the far right is a respectable right.

339 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:40:44pm

Well, I've read the papers, and I'm still a bit skeptical. The two strongest bits of evidence in their favor that they cite in the PDF are the 1997 quote from historian Helene Lööw (wikipage in Swedish), who they describe as not aligned with their party, and the Herzl award given by the Swedish Zionist Federation (website in Swedish) to Ted Ekeroth.

Since I can't read Swedish, and don't know the cultural background, I have to rely on those sorts of circumstantial indicators. In the documents they fess up to having been in a European Nationalist organization that included the French National Front, but the present leadership considers that to have been a mistake, and they say that they quickly distanced themselves from the Eur-Nat (see "International Cooperation" in the PDF).

There's an interesting comment here from a Swedish blogger who's critical of LGF's editorial line on these European nationalist parties.

We have seen in Sweden how Sverigedemokraterna broke up into two parties, with the anti-Semites going to Nationaldemokraterna, and the remaining party now being the most philo-Semitic party in all of Sweden.

We should also mention how Ted Ekeroth has been a board member of the Zionist Federation of Sweden. How he as the first Swede who got the Herzl Award, a prestigious Zionist award, in 2006. Ted Ekeroth says "The Sweden Democrats are the most Israel-friendly party that I can think of". And "If you are a Zionist, then you are a Jewish nationalist, then you must also respect the Swedish nationalism."

Now, admittedly, it's consistent with being an ethnic separatist to say something like that, but I don't think an ethnic separatist party would be saying how much more "diverse" they are than their major party opponents, as the Swedish Democrats do in their PDF when they talk about running more immigrant candidates than the Social Democrats.

340 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:40:54pm

re: #321 J.S.

re: #275 EtNorskTroll

Ah, that's it! Thank you Norsk Troll!

Your welcome~!

Hateful bit of business, there, that "Lebensborn" thing.

~Norsk Troll

341 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:41:06pm

re: #330 Charles

I have been increasingly glad of that for some years. Once upon a time I toyed with the notion of going somewhere else, Australia, whatever, but I've found that events of the last decade my love for this country beyond measure.

343 stevieray  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:41:40pm

These guys seem to be worse than I thought. I didn't really know much about them, and I assumed most of the nazi label came from left wing smear merchants and EuroMSM propagandists. They seem to have earned much of their neo-fascist reputations all on their own, so I'll put them on the "highly unlikely ally" list. If they continue to reform themselves and further repudiate their past, I may reconsider.

That still leaves the million dollar question: Where can the Swedes turn? The existent parties like the current situation (vote left or vote nazi) because it keeps them in power. The media, the schools, and the insiders will not let a conservative or center-right party form or grow, leaving the people without any real choices. How can the Europeans change things when the powerful have insulated themselves so completely from the common folk? Is an insurrection the only remaining option? It seems so.

344 newsjunkie_ky  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:42:18pm

re: #331 avideditorla.com

re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.


Then why did only 25% of the Jewish population vote Republican in '04?

345 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:42:20pm

re: #330 Charles

I've never been more glad to have been born an American than I am tonight.

But what keeps things that way? You and the Lizardoids are a big part of the reason why things aren't going the same way here!

346 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:42:31pm

re: #325 Malatrope

re: #307 1389

But we didn't engage Stalin immediately after WWII.

"Engage"? We engaged him during WWII, shipping the USSR all kinds of supplies, not to mention fighting with them as allies.

In fact, we let him have a great deal. Was Patton wrong in wanting to head East immediately after Berlin? How would history have turned out differently? I have heard this argued persuasively from both sides (would have been better, would have been worse).

"Too soon to tell".

After all, we never did come to nuclear war with the soviets so maybe we got away cheaply after all. But all the noise Putin is making these days, maybe the game isn't over yet.

You think we'll get away that cheaply against the Islamic terrorists?

347 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:42:50pm

re: #315 Malatrope

re: #270 Highrise

The idea is not to let either of them win, but it's ok if they weaken each other.

That is ideal....in practice, I just can't see it :( . The perception game ramps up and I have to agree with a previous poster that the winner is stronger and more emboldened.

348 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:43:20pm

re: #331 avideditorla.com

re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.

Can you find us some authoritative numbers?

349 Jimmy The Clam  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:43:24pm

As a final parting shot, I would like to remind everyone to not to AUTOMATICLY buy into the loaded terms espoused by political enemies.

I thought my mind was already made up on this, but now I have more to read and consider.
Do we have any Swedish Lizards that could help shed some light on this?

350 jeppo[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:43:24pm
351 Mich-again  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:43:57pm

Oh and Fjordman never engages me in debate either. But his toadies come out and snipe for a while. Ha.

352 Mich-again  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:44:22pm

re: #350 jeppo

BS

353 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:44:23pm

re: #334 Killgore Trout

re: #293 Fjordman


They must be getting soft these days....

Yes, it appears they're putting on a friendly face and hiding their intentions in exchange for legitimacy and support from others in the anti-jihad movement.

It's a classic tactic, straight out of "The Price".

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Machiavellian methods at their worst.

Charles might be right about this, too....

It's starting to have all the stink of the tactics taught in "The Prince", that's for sure!

~Norsk Troll

354 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:44:35pm

I think some of the movement is alarmist, pessimistic, and coming from a base of we are doomed from the start. They are a minority party and will stay a minority party as long as the ends justifies the means, and grim rationalizations justify behaviour such as this:

[Link: www.expatica.com...]


Why do the parties have militants Fjordman?

( I can say that because in the interview with Pam posted at Atlas Shrugs, Filip DeWinters admits that they do while denying anti-semitism):

In thirty years, not one of our militants ever committed even one anti-Semitic act. These are not empty words. These are facts. You can check them. Ask the Jews in Antwerp. This is at least a strong indication that we are no anti-Semites. Mr. Marinower says we are evil guys, just pretending to be decent right-wingers. People can play a misleading role for some years. But is it possible that tens of thousands of people play a misleading role for almost thirty years?

355 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:44:44pm

re: #350 jeppo

So eager to jump on the fascist bandwagon on the advice of others.

356 Pawn of the Oppressor  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:44:47pm

I can't believe there are people who think that hanging out with f-cking Nazis is OK.

357 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:44:48pm

To quote Sharon Lee and Steve Miller:

When considering taking an ally, you must ask yourself two questions: Can they shoot? and Will they fire at your enemies?

It seems to me that we are asking the second question, here, and it's very, very important. I want to be sure they'll fight the enemy, and not just wait to destroy us.

I'm in this for the long haul.

358 JeremyR  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:45:00pm

re: #273 Maine's Michael

re: #267 JeremyR


I was blown away when I read J-J's post. Jews a threat?

Good pick up.

I guess maybe we are a threat to Nazi's, islamofascists, and that brand of thuggery. Prior to WW2 most jews were turn the other cheek types. Today, Mossad is the most feared force in the middle east.

359 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:45:00pm

re: #344 newsjunkie_ky

re: #331 avideditorla.com

re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.


Then why did only 25% of the Jewish population vote Republican in '04?

Because we haven't been effective enough yet in getting the message out to everybody.

360 newsjunkie_ky  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:45:09pm

re: #348 itellu3times
I chuckle every time I read your nic.

361 formercorpsman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:45:09pm

re: #225 Fjordman

Fjordman, I just took the time to read your post.

You sum up what has been my opinion about the road we are heading down as a human species.

Having opined here, I think what will unfortunately happen is that in the absence of fairness, and reality, the average guy who has no inclination to think like a radical, will eventually be a willing victim with no actual rights supposedly protected by law, or will forfeit his conscience for refuge.

Let's say it is his daughter that is raped. The domino's fall similar to the scenario you described. His daughter is the victim, he wants justice, and becomes the criminal in the process.

My impression is we are losing our civility. We are losing our enlightenment. The purveyors of equality jaundice the system by omitting equality on political grounds.

Man I really hate pessimism sometimes. But I think about things like the Phelps gang, and how they seem to get a pass, or worse, the ability to muddy up the judicial process, influenced by judges who are willing participants of the spectacle, and it makes it hard for me to have hope sometimes.

Growing up, my adolescent fears were of the Soviet bomb, the loudness of the air raid sirens, and enough explosions to eliminate life on the planet.

Having small children, my adult fears are that we are drifting back towards a dark age, tinted with modernity, having come so close to the shining city on the hill.

362 DesertSage  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:45:22pm

re: #328 Akrav

The republican party probably has plenty of members who are so radically Christian that they believe all Jews should be converted or something like that. Despite this, we should not be alarmed about the whole of the republican party.

That's a pretty broad statement, and I don't believe it's true at all.

There was a time back in the 80's when some radical Christian groups tried to identify themselves with the Republican party. And when I say 'radical Christian groups' I mean white supremacists. Reagan and the Republican leadership would not stand for it and they were immediately given the boot.
I would not be a Republican today if they didn't show such resolve back then.

363 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:45:47pm

re: #346 itellu3times

By "engage" I meant "attack" or "push back". Sorry.
And no, I don't think we'll get away cheaply with the Islamic issue, because I don't think we're moving fast enough to 1) confront them, and 2) convince others on our side that they need to be confronted. There are two big problems, and one of them is within the West.

364 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:46:25pm

re: #357 Dianna

I can think of a 3rd question when considering an ally:

What will they do to me after we win?

365 newsjunkie_ky  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:47:07pm

re: #359 1389

re: #344 newsjunkie_ky


re: #331 avideditorla.com

re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.

Then why did only 25% of the Jewish population vote Republican in '04?

Because we haven't been effective enough yet in getting the message out to everybody.

Huh?

366 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:47:11pm

#268: I don't know that person, but I would be extremely cautious with accepting any claims from that site, a hard-Left/Communist site which is a lot less reliable than Daily Kos or LGF Watch.

Look, bad elements do exist in Sweden, more so than in Denmark due to the repressive political climate. I have discussed how to relate to the SD with Bruce Bawer at least once before. It is difficult to find a single decent party to vote for in that country, and if they are serious about rooting anti-Semites in their party, which I think they are, I think they should get a hearing. I don't see why I cannot even talk to people from a nation that is in the process of being overrun by Jihad while all Western governments, yours included, fund Palestinian terrorist organizations.

[Link: www.brusselsjournal.com...]

The Swedish Social Democratic Party, like many other Labor parties, have decided to cooperate with Muslims and import voters while ignoring the violence caused by these Muslims against the native population.

According to this post from the website of Broderskapsrörelsen (“The Brotherhood”), an organization of Christian members of the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the party has decided to establish a network for people of other faiths (which largely seems to mean Muslims). “This is a historic decision for the Brotherhood,” says leader Peter Weiderud. “I’m incredibly happy that a unanimous congress now lets the door open for Muslims and others to work together with us in the Brotherhood; this is going to enrich us all and help the [Social Democratic] Party to better influence the Swedish society.”

For Abdulkader Habib, active within the Muslim Brotherhood, the decision is a historic step which shows that the dividing lines in society do not go between religions, but within religions. “As a Muslim Social Democrat I have more in common with the Christian Social Democrats than I have with those within the Muslim Right,” says Habib. “Faith and politics is intertwined for many Muslims, which is why the decision to create this network is a key to the crucial work for integration that we need to do, and I believe that the Brotherhood is the right organization to do this within.”

“We shouldn’t disregard the importance of people's [religious] faith,” says deputy leader Cecilia Dalman-Eek. “When we now get the opportunity to open the doors to people with another faith it is obvious that we should contribute with our experience. At the same time, this is both instructive and inspiring for us Christians within the Brotherhood. This is about an exciting growth of new mass movements and is a part of the new Sweden.”

The Social Democrats are now following the line of reasoning put forward by Jens Orback, former Cabinet Minister for the Social Democrats, who said during a radio debate that: “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.” The Swedish Social Democrats narrowly lost the elections last year, and appear to have decided that the way to regain and maintain power is to import Muslim voters, a strategy followed by several of their sister parties.

367 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:47:38pm

re: #364 Highrise

re: #357 Dianna

I can think of a 3rd question when considering an ally:

What will they do to me after we win?

Bingo.

368 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:47:58pm
369 avideditorla.com[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:48:31pm
370 DesertSage  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:48:34pm

re: #331 avideditorla.com

re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.

A large percentage of Lizard Jews (myself included) are Republican. But that's because we're enlightened :')

Over 70% of Jews voted for John F'n Kerry in '06.

371 Mich-again  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:48:36pm

Fjordman has repeatedly said that the USA needs to stop all immigration of Muslims. But he never lays the groundwork for how something so unconstitutional could ever be enacted. Nope those are silly details for Bureaucrats. And thats where he always jumps off the reality train.

372 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:49:06pm

re: #357 Dianna

Good point. My strategic concepts may be better suited to table top games than the real world. I will admit I don't have any experience at generalship. I tend to put things in the same kind of terms one would describe an engineering problem, and the human world definitely is much more complex than that.

373 marjoriemoon  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:49:35pm

re: #326 DesertSage

re: #287 marjoriemoon


Are there any Jewish members of the Swedish Democrats?

That may give you your answer.


There are very few Jewish Republicans either. For some reason (which is beyond me) they seem to gravitate toward the Leftist Democrats here in America, so I don't think you'll get your answer there.

I'm surprised to see that Ekeroth is Jewish (Thanks J.S.). I would be curious how many others.

But I wouldn't categorize Jewish Reps as "very few". Certainly the majority are Dems, but that has changed greatly in the last few elections. I don't know the % of Jews in Sweden to begin with or what their party affiliations are, but I'd be shocked to see more than a scattered few in the S.D. And to them I'd say, watch your back.

374 Randman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:49:42pm

re: #355 Killgore Trout

re: #350 jeppo

So eager to jump on the fascist bandwagon on the advice of others.

Wow! Is that what you read in Fjordman's comments because I interpreted them completely opposite.

375 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:49:50pm

re: #366 Fjordman


I don't know that person, but I would be extremely cautious with accepting any claims from that site, a hard-Left/Communist site which is a lot less reliable than Daily Kos or LGF Watch.


It's all a manufactured socialist smear? All the Nazi ties, all the antisemitism, the uniforms, the flags?

376 avideditorla.com[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:50:04pm
377 Mich-again  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:50:17pm

re: #366 Fjordman

Dude. can you answer a question without cutting and pasting essays?

378 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:50:32pm

re: #303 Ed mahmoud abu al Kahoul

Saying that Neo-Nazism may have a good cause because it may defend Europe is like saying that the Devil will send some to hell sooner rather than later.

I didn't say that.

I said I doubt they are much of a threat, but that they make it easier for Islamists and fellow travelers to label all who oppose sharia and jihad as racists. That is why we shouldn't associate with them.

Again, maybe the ones who oppose creeping sharia who aren't white power nuts need to form a new party and keep the nutcases out.

That's another issue we need to consider.

379 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:50:41pm

re: #331 avideditorla.com

re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.

After a quick google:

http://www.category305.com/trends/jewish-politics- on-miami-beach.php

In fact, a recent study indicated that 61 percent of American Jews are registered Democrats while only 14 percent are registered Republicans, said Ira M. Sheskin, Director of the Jewish Demography Project of the Sue and Leonard Miller Center for Contemporary Judaic Studies at the University of Miami. (For more stats, also see the North American Jewish Data Bank.)

Anyway, look at the politics of Israel, almost half the residents there are leftoid nut cases, and there's a smattering of right-wing Jewish and non-Jewish nut cases, too.

380 Jimmy The Clam  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:50:42pm

re: #356 Pawn of the Oppressor

I can't believe there are people who think that hanging out with f-cking Nazis is OK.

I think the real question is: "Are they really Nazis?"

That question should answer all others in my book.

381 formercorpsman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:50:53pm

re: #296 Stonemason

Hey Stone, when I am done with it, we can trade up.

I also like Posner's "Why America Slept"

382 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:50:56pm

re: #360 newsjunkie_ky

re: #348 itellu3times
I chuckle every time I read your nic.


HAHA I do too!

383 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:51:03pm

re: #364 Highrise

Well, the video game answer to that is to make sure you end up stronger than they are. Do you envision the SD types ending up with control of Europe?

...I guess that is a possibility that should be considered...

384 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:51:30pm

re: #374 Randman

No, that's how I read Jeepro's comment....

If Fjordman gives the Sweden Democrats the thumbs up, that's all I need to know to support them.

385 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:51:37pm

re: #350 jeppo

The 2003 Party Platform ends any hope of my accepting them as my allies. No matter what Fjordman thinks, and no matter how I respect him.

386 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:52:15pm

re: #369 avideditorla.com

re: #348 itellu3times
re: #331 avideditorla.com
re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.
Can you find us some authoritative numbers?
I can't provide authoritative numbers. Ask the Republican Jewish Coalition. All I know is most Orthodox Jews are Republicans.

True, but most Jews are not Orthodox.

Of course the Orthodox say they are then not Jews, ...

387 Yankee Division Son  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:52:20pm
I’m trying to be fair even while the hackles rise on the back of my neck, I’m putting them online and inviting comments.

See? Charles always allows opposing viewpoints, provided they are presented in a sane, well reasoned manner, and expressed in rated 'G' context. (well okay, sometimes a little 'R', but don't push it)

Picture a town square, say in 1907, where townspeople gather to debate issues of the day from varied viewpoints. Got something relevant to say? People will want to hear it. Start hurling vile insults while spouting pure fantasy as fact and the town folk will call the sheriff. (If you really push it, we'll grab the pitchforks and torches..)

Kudos Charles. Thank you for the opportunity to debate freely.

388 Stonemason  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:53:30pm

re: #381 formercorpsman

re: #296 Stonemason

Hey Stone, when I am done with it, we can trade up.

I also like Posner's "Why America Slept"


Sounds like a plan, most of my reading material is picked up at the library, but I actually bought Spencer's book!

389 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:53:42pm

re: #315 Malatrope

re: #270 Highrise

The idea is not to let either of them win, but it's ok if they weaken each other.

That's what the liberals think when they use the Islamists as a club to beat us over the head with. They think they can discard the Islamists after they finish using them. But it's never possible to fine-tune it that well.

390 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:53:49pm

re: #359 1389


Then why did only 25% of the Jewish population vote Republican in '04?

Because we haven't been effective enough yet in getting the message out to everybody.

Sorry, 1389, I don't think that cuts the mustard. The Jewish population in the U.S. is probably the best educated and best informed group of the entire American populace. They vote in the highest numbers (I've seen some elections where Jewish participation was over 95%) and spend oodles of time organizing and volunteering for political groups. There is something of a disconnect somewhere - maybe from the long 20th century legacy of socialism/communism in Jewish life? But not having gotten the message out is not why Jewish voters go overwhelming Democratic.

391 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:54:14pm

re: #382 Highrise

re: #360 newsjunkie_ky
re: #348 itellu3times
I chuckle every time I read your nic.
HAHA I do too!

Me, too!

Glad to be of service.

392 Mich-again  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:54:15pm

I'll be more convinced that Euros really want to stop the global jihad when they advance beyond wearing costumes, writing essays and drawing cartoons.

393 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:54:36pm
394 avideditorla.com[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:54:54pm
395 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:54:58pm

re: #361 formercorpsman

Howard Bloom kept saying (citing someone I'd never heard of, which worried me) that we were heading back into a Theocratic Age.

I'm still thinking about that.

396 WrathofG-d  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:55:01pm

Ani Yahood

397 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:55:09pm

re: #389 1389

Whoa. You are exactly correct there. And I've done my part to call them on it. Thanks for pointing that out.

398 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:56:32pm

re: #364 Highrise

As I said (or hoped I did, anyway), it's a big part of question 2.

399 rappmandu  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:56:57pm

Interesting thread. I'm glad we're having this discussion. There are too many who simply swallow the whole enemy of my enemy is my friend, without considering the implications before entering into alliances, political coalitions, etc.

For example, India is an ally in the GWOT, but there are definitely groups we should be wary of. Shiva Sena, RSS, etc. Now, if one or more of those groups takes power or is part of a governing coalition, how does that impact bilateral ties?

400 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:57:20pm

re: #383 Malatrope

This may or may not surprise you.....

But some democrats I had lunch with that were ex coworkers were discussing how all republicans should be hung up and shot. I never went back to see them ever. I was registered independent at the time...that event along with seeing howard dean be placed up to head the party made me register Republican.

Today, the dems as a party would distance themselves from nazi's.......but....


Scary, is the future. /channeling yoda

401 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:57:27pm

re: #395 Dianna

re: #361 formercorpsman

Howard Bloom kept saying (citing someone I'd never heard of, which worried me) that we were heading back into a Theocratic Age.

I'm still thinking about that.

If you're interested in a science fiction parallel, Heinlein posited a theocracy, just after "The Crazy Years".

402 father_of_10  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:57:37pm

I thought what they said was fine. I think Sweden needs to get people like them to clean the place up. Of course, I only know what i read and we certainly don't need any more nazis like these: NAZI
But I think we can easily deal with Illinois Nazis!

403 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:57:56pm

re: #264 allahakchew

I just have a hard time with this and feel very uncomfortable.
I keep thinking back about the Muslim Brotherhood/Nazi connections that started years ago.

snip
Nazi Islam

Heinrich Himmler, Head of SS, and close colleague of Amin Al-Husseini, financed and established Islamic Institute (‘Islamische Zentralinstitut’) in Dresden under the Mufti. The purpose was to create a generation of Islamic leaders that would continue to use Islam as a carrier for Nazi ideology into the 21st century. [xxxv]

[Link: www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com...]

My point exactly.

404 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:58:04pm

re: #366 Fjordman

I'm sorry, but it's getting late, and I'm getting tired. Could you please boil that down to one paragraph?

405 newsjunkie_ky  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:58:27pm

re: #376 avideditorla.com

re: #365 newsjunkie_ky


re: #359 1389
re: #344 newsjunkie_ky

re: #331 avideditorla.com

re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.

Then why did only 25% of the Jewish population vote Republican in '04?

Because we haven't been effective enough yet in getting the message out to everybody.
Huh?

Each election more and more Jews vote Republican.


That's what I've heard, but only 25% voted for Bush in '04. Makes no sense to me why Jews vote for dems who want us to be defeated by the islamofacists.
But, most Jews are still democrats.

406 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:59:13pm

re: #400 Highrise

Doesn't surprise me in the least. We need to make more effort to counter them whenever they call Nazis "right wing". They were left wing...just like the socialists they aspire to be.

407 kafir  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:59:37pm

Please allow me to state the obvious here, and wade from the herd instinct.

Charles, I believe that you know that wikipedia is highly suspect in the area of "controversial" figures. You yourself, and this site, and its denizens have been maligned more than once.

This is not lending support to them, just pointing out that for "controversial" people/groups, wikipedia is often accuracy challenged. The NPOV is a great ideal, but as the wikipedia editing "scandals" of recent months show, there is a tendency for people to trash what they don't like.

All this said, I never met a nazi I liked. They killed my relatives. Though long dead now, I initially learned of the shoah by asking an uncle about the numbers tattoed on his arm. I worry about what to tell my child, and when to tell her. My parents struggled with telling us. They did impress one thing in particular upon me and my siblings. Nazis and their fellow travelers are dangerous. Nationalism by itself is not a dangerous movement, but it can become one. So can socialism when given power and time to evolve into communism.

I don't know about these groups, it does appear they are trying to alter what they are, grow into something else.

I am sorry to see the public spat with Pamela. Both of you have done a stellar job of raising awareness.

That said, I won't stand with nazis. Not that I know if these folks are nazis. I think Robert Spenser would not knowingly stand with them, and would disavow them if he later learned they were nazis. This is an assumption.

Pamela, who I am guessing is one of my tribe, is not a self hating person, so I highly doubt she would willingly stand with nazis or give them a free pass.

It is quite possible that nazis do stand with these groups.

We have Pat Buchanan, David Duke and others stand with parties in the US. We have Dhimmi Carter and Robert Byrd standing with the democrats. This doesn't mean all democrats are bad, some of them are quite smart, and well intentioned. Nor does it mean that all republicans or conservatives are bad.

There are assholes in every group. Wikipedia entries are modifiable by people with an agenda, and such things have happened to you and LGF. Caucusing where you have said assholes present shouldn't necessarily taint the entire group. If the group attempts to edit out the assholes, strike their views from the group, that should be viewed in a positive light.

But if the group is a group of assholes, unrepentant and excreble assholes, then they are deserving of heaped derision. Our friends who stray there ought to be at least informed as to who they are meeting with, in case they don't know.

408 BenZacharia  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 8:59:53pm

I was about to post that if June_July thinks I such a threat I will remove myself as long as it was here.

This user is blocked.

Re: Jewish Republicans, the more orthodox in belief the more conservative in politics. I see the same thing with Christians.

409 zenren  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:00:08pm

What good is it to exchange one form of oppression for another (i.e. Islamism for Nazism)? Not to mention, it is morally reprehensible to knowingly secure your own freedom and life possibly at the expense of another. We all get frustrated and feel hopeless sometimes, but let's not cede the moral high road. There must be another way.

410 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:00:14pm

re: #372 Malatrope

I studied history, and I write. I do politics, I take military advice. It's a good rule to not try for expertise in everything.

411 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:00:34pm

re: #400 Highrise

...oh, and (not be nitpicky) the correct Yoda-speak would be "Scary, the future is." Yodish is essentially Germannic :)

412 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:01:14pm

re: #366 Fjordman
Yes, and we have people who ally with them here to further political aims -- it's a loosing strategy over time. Sorry still not a good rationalization.

Allying with race purists to defeat race purists isn't going to get you the average Swede -- instead it will turn them away.

Anything overblown or alarmist might gain attention and press for a short while, but fades over time and defeats itself by its own means of communication.

Look at Code Pink here as an example. Their extreme theater makes people instantly discount their message for the most part. While it might irritate the hell out of us, it's a failed strategy.

I really suspect people who ring the alarm too loud, or who say the sky will fall on us tomorrow, it makes me question their real motives.

413 jaunte  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:01:51pm

From the party's statement of principles:

"The nationalist principle is based on the concept of the nation state, that the territorial boundaries of the state shall coincide with its demographic boundaries."

This is not a political principle that an American can agree with; it's completely antithetical to our culture.

And I couldn't make past this idea:

"a high degree of ethnic and cultural uniformity amongst the people."

This is the kind of thinking the United States has got to rise above, and the world would be a better place if we put 'ethnic uniformity' in the dustbin.

I'm not buying the Swedish Democrats line. There are other ways to fight pseudo- religious cultural supremacists than supporting any bozo that happens to be opposed to them. Pace Churchill, but we're not quite yet in the position of the English in 1940.

414 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:02:01pm

re: #375 Killgore Trout

"Caution" doesn't mean "instantly dismiss".

415 jeppo[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:02:02pm
416 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:02:18pm

I know the Swiss just HAD an election, and the winning party was accused of being racist and Nazi and every other name in the book. Maybe we should revisit that election and check the history of that Swiss party, and see if there are or aren't any parallels with the Swedish party idealogically. (Note that I have not read the attachments.)

Even though I am a certifiable right-winger that makes many of you Republicans look moderate :-), ANY association with a group with even a Nazi PAST makes me feel ill. Why should this Swedish party even try to reach across the Atlantic? If WE see problems, their own popuations must have serious doubts. If there were problems in the past, then they maybe need to just form an entirely new party and severe all previous connections. Just sayin'.

And I find it irritating that Europe is still the same. You either have FAR left or FAR right. Like that Donald Sutherland movie I just saw, Land of the Blind. Here in Canada we have Liberals and Conservatives, both essentially moderate tilting parties, like you in the States with the Republicans and the Democrats. In Europe there are no such critters. In Europe it seems like they are unable to form a conservative, right-leaning party without bumping into Nazis. Pathetic, actually. And that does not bode well for Europe as a whole, in lieau of their impending Islamification. For such an enlightened continent, they do seem painfully clueless at times.

417 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:04:17pm

re: #399 rappmandu

Interesting thread. I'm glad we're having this discussion. There are too many who simply swallow the whole enemy of my enemy is my friend, without considering the implications before entering into alliances, political coalitions, etc.

For example, India is an ally in the GWOT, but there are definitely groups we should be wary of. Shiva Sena, RSS, etc. Now, if one or more of those groups takes power or is part of a governing coalition, how does that impact bilateral ties?

I am also wary of the intel we get from India, it tends to be aslant sometimes, but I read it constantly because it does have some good facts on the extremists. They are also doing a kick ass job on keeping the lid on the forming intifada in J&K for the moment.

418 formercorpsman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:04:18pm

re: #395 Dianna

You would think with how far we have come, it would not be possible.

Ah, I just thought of it.

It was Dan Simmons. I read something of his probably 9-12 months ago that parses with your comments rather well.

It was fiction, but it disturbed me.

419 Milk Toast Intolerant  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:04:36pm

re: #350 jeppo

If Fjordman gives the Sweden Democrats the thumbs up, that's all I need to know to support them. Who here can claim one-tenth of Fjordman's expertise when it comes to Scandinavian politics? Read and learn from this highly respected writer instead of stomping all over potential allies without gathering ALL the relevant information first.

While I respect Fjordman, I trust Charles a whole lot more. The Sweden Democrats are free to proceed with their goals, but Charles and LGF don't have to support them.

420 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:04:47pm

re: #252 Jewels (AKA Julian)

Re: the Neo-Nazi's & Socialist Fascists

"The Enemy of My Enemy...Is Still My Enemy". Sorry, no alliance with Fascists, thank you. I got my family out of Europe several years ago because we saw what was coming now. Never Again.

That's the type of mistake that Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski made in backing OBL and the mujahideen against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. We all know how that turned out!

421 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:05:32pm

re: #392 Mich-again

When CNN, and the New York Times will bloody well show the cartoons, I'll start thinking we might be serious.

That's not an attack, it's an expression of absolute exasperation.

422 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:05:58pm

re: #410 Dianna

But I can't help being interested in everything. I'm not trying to portray myself as an expert here, I'm just tossing ideas into the campfire. If that causes an expert to say something new that the rest of us hadn't verbalized mentally, then that is a positive thing. Several people have pointed things out that I hadn't considered, and I'm grateful for that. This has been quite a thread, and I'm sure there will be a few more that chew on this subject.

423 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:06:00pm

re: #415 jeppo

Not one poster has offered any alternative for the Swedes to vote for. If you hate the SDs, fine. What's your political solution to the Islamization of Sweden?

If the situation is as bad as you and Fjordman paint, then forming a new party without racists in it shouldn't be that hard. You have the issues on your side. If the picture's not as bad as the one painted well then that might be harder.

424 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:06:21pm
In Sweden today there is a Jewish population of approximately 18,000 out of a population of 9 million.

So that's one fifth of 1%.

/Just providing a little bit of perspective. Muslims in Sweden are about 500,000 or 4.5%. Which says a lot about Sweden. And that's not meant to be flattering.

425 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:06:54pm

#311: Charles, I agree that some of the characteristics of you were grossly unfair, but I don't think your treatment of this has been entirely without problems, either. You didn't have to launch such a full-scale assault without even talking to the people and parties involved and listen to their side of the story.

If Fjordman gives the Sweden Democrats the thumbs up, that's all I need to know to support them.

I haven't given them any thumbs up yet, I just want to give them a chance to state their case. I don't see who else to talk to. Sweden is probably the most totalitarian country in the Western world. There simply isn't any debate about immigration or Multiculturalism at all.

426 itellu3times  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:07:13pm

re: #394 avideditorla.com

re: #386 itellu3times
re: #369 avideditorla.com
re: #348 itellu3times
re: #331 avideditorla.com
re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.
Can you find us some authoritative numbers?
I can't provide authoritative numbers. Ask the Republican Jewish Coalition. All I know is most Orthodox Jews are Republicans.
True, but most Jews are not Orthodox.
Of course the Orthodox say they are then not Jews, ...

I do not like your implications. Most Jews believe that if you have a Jewish mother then you are Jewish, despite how many laws you follow.

Hey, I'm not implying anything, what the heck did you hear? This is common talk within the Jewish community, and it means whatever it means, maybe nothing.

427 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:08:02pm

re: #416 canadianally

Nazis are RIGHT WING. Repeat, rinse, repeat again.

428 marwan's daughter  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:08:22pm

re: #399 rappmandu

Interesting thread. I'm glad we're having this discussion. There are too many who simply swallow the whole enemy of my enemy is my friend, without considering the implications before entering into alliances, political coalitions, etc.

For example, India is an ally in the GWOT, but there are definitely groups we should be wary of. Shiva Sena, RSS, etc. Now, if one or more of those groups takes power or is part of a governing coalition, how does that impact bilateral ties?

Glad you brought that up. Here is an example of how bad the Hindu fascists can be: Bajrang Dal (which is another Hindu fascist party like Shiv Sena) official confesses he slaughtered Muslims during the Godhra riots in Gujarat, and loved it.

English translation here.

429 EtNorskTroll  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:08:28pm

re: #408 BenZacharia

I was about to post that if June_July thinks I such a threat I will remove myself as long as it was here.

This user is blocked.

Re: Jewish Republicans, the more orthodox in belief the more conservative in politics. I see the same thing with Christians.

Your Jewish-fu is strong , Ben!

yeah..."JJ" was kind of stinking up the joint.

Good riddance to bad garbage...

~Norsk Troll

430 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:08:29pm

re: #401 Malatrope

Led into by Sixth Column, the only Heinlein book I've ever flat-out considered racist. I know.

This was a more serious consideration.

431 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:09:02pm

re: #427 Malatrope

OMIGOD, I mean of course "Nazis are LEFT WING!"....gad, it's time for bed. I just reversed myself within two posts.

'nite all.

432 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:09:06pm

Hey, burma shave...

433 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:09:09pm

re: #415 jeppo


Not one poster has offered any alternative for the Swedes to vote for. If you hate the SDs, fine.

First, It isn't for US to offer the alternative. That is up to the Swedes to do. Who they align with though, matters to not only their survival but also how they are thought of.

Second, I think using the word hate is a bit strong. I think most are still wading through actions, documents given to them by the party, and backgrounds.

434 father_of_10  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:09:44pm

Having a nazi past shouldn't be a problem. A KKK past didn't hurt our esteemed senator from West Virginia, Mr. Byrd.

435 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:10:02pm

re: #427 Malatrope

re: #416 canadianally

Nazis are RIGHT WING. Repeat, rinse, repeat again.


Unfortunately, these clowns bump up against the FAR right and the FAR left.

436 allahakchew  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:10:31pm

re: #238 mama winger

Fjordman's here.

Now I gotta think more.

Me too, but still have gut feeling.

437 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:10:47pm

re: #325 Malatrope

re: #307 1389

But we didn't engage Stalin immediately after WWII. In fact, we let him have a great deal. Was Patton wrong in wanting to head East immediately after Berlin? How would history have turned out differently? I have heard this argued persuasively from both sides (would have been better, would have been worse).

Maybe we should have; I don't know. My crystal ball broke! The point I was making was that the Soviet Union DID emerge stronger after WWII. The shared experience of victory did, in fact, give Stalin a new lease on life, and it did build up popular support for Stalin and for the Communist regime.

438 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:10:51pm

# 425 - Fjordman

I go to Norway from time to time - how do they rate as far as this totalitarianism you are talking about?re: #425 Fjordman

I haven't given them any thumbs up yet, I just want to give them a chance to state their case. I don't see who else to talk to. Sweden is probably the most totalitarian country in the Western world. There simply isn't any debate about immigration or Multiculturalism at all.

439 newsjunkie_ky  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:11:02pm

G'nite all.
I leave you with the funniest line from '30 Rock':

Never go to the second location with a hippie.

440 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:11:33pm

re: #415 jeppo

We aren't debating Swedish internal politics here. We're debating whether or not the Swedish Democrats and Vlaam are worth accepting as allies into the Anti-Jihad family. Personally I couldn't care less about Swedish politics but I don't want to show up to an Anti-Islamist convention with Nazis and Skinheads.

441 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:13:04pm

re: #415 jeppo

That, my dear person, is the problem of the Swedes. Figure it out.

For heaven's sake, DEAL! It's your country.

We are the friends of liberty everywhere, but the stewards only of our own.

- John Adams.

442 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:13:22pm

re: #365 newsjunkie_ky

re: #359 1389

re: #344 newsjunkie_ky


re: #331 avideditorla.com


re: #326 DesertSage
How can you say there are few Jewish Republicans? A large percentage of the Jewish population is Republican.


Then why did only 25% of the Jewish population vote Republican in '04?


Because we haven't been effective enough yet in getting the message out to everybody.

Huh?

We need to show everyone how the Dhimmicrats are selling out the Jews and everyone else to the Islamists. Unfortunately, too many of the Republicans aren't much better in that regard.

443 DesertSage  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:14:11pm

re: #427 Malatrope

re: #416 canadianally

Nazis are RIGHT WING. Repeat, rinse, repeat again.

Wrong!
Nazis are Leftists! Always have been...always will be.

444 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:14:29pm

re: #420 1389

re: #252 Jewels (AKA Julian)

Re: the Neo-Nazi's & Socialist Fascists

"The Enemy of My Enemy...Is Still My Enemy". Sorry, no alliance with Fascists, thank you. I got my family out of Europe several years ago because we saw what was coming now. Never Again.

That's the type of mistake that Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski made in backing OBL and the mujahideen against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. We all know how that turned out!

Sorry, but I consider Fascist Parties much the same as Socialist twit parties. The are much like the Tale of the Wolf and the Scorpion

445 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:15:05pm

Fjordman, Jeppo -- Do the Swedish Democrats have a militant wing as it seems VB might?

I have to get some sleeps here, but drop the comment and I will check back on the morrow.

446 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:15:09pm

re: #424 Irene NYC

I think that's why groups like Swedish Dems and Vlaams have come to compromise on Israel. Their Jewish problem has been transfered to the Middle East and they're content with that.

447 zenren  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:15:19pm

#441 Dianna

We are the friends of liberty everywhere, but the stewards only of our own.

- John Adams.

Great quote! I'll have to write that one down.

448 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:15:35pm

re: #430 Dianna

And I agree that it may be coming. There are a lot of people out there who believe that the only way to fight an extreme religion is with another extreme religion. I don't really think that's the right course, and I hope it doesn't turn out that way.

A great deal of Heinlein's work is quite serious, but I agree that the earlier stuff was only intended as entertainment. Sixth Column was a great book if you were concerned with the technology involved, which I was when I was 12. The social aspects, not so nice.

/turns off computer, goes to bed

449 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:15:57pm

re: #440 Killgore Trout

re: #415 jeppo

We aren't debating Swedish internal politics here. We're debating whether or not the Swedish Democrats and Vlaam are worth accepting as allies into the Anti-Jihad family. Personally I couldn't care less about Swedish politics but I don't want to show up to an Anti-Islamist convention with Nazis and Skinheads.

Unfortunately, I think it has come to the place where we HAVE to be concerned with the internal politics of major nations such as Sweden. Remember How Afghanistan's internal politics affected us all?

450 konservo  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:16:09pm

It's the 21st century, a group that has to produce 6 documents in an attempt prove (which, IMHO, they do not) that they are not a neo-Nazi organization, is a group that I want nothing to do with.

Yeah, many are concerned about Islamization and radical Islam. However, that's no reason to accept groups with elements of Nazism as allies.

451 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:16:27pm

re: #418 formercorpsman

Fiction, as Ursula LeGuin pointed out years ago, is a way of examining the present. That comment has made me a much more aware reader, even of very slight things, over the years.

It also worries me about my own work, because I can't see it while I'm writing. To me, it's just a story, and it has me in its grip.

452 jaunte  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:16:31pm

[Link: www.politicalresources.net...]
9 million people and more than 50 political parties in one country.
This may be why an unaccountable bureaucracy in Brussels is taking over.

453 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:17:25pm

re: #444 Jewels (AKA Julian)

re: #420 1389

re: #252 Jewels (AKA Julian)

Re: the Neo-Nazi's & Socialist Fascists"The Enemy of My Enemy...Is Still My Enemy". Sorry, no alliance with Fascists, thank you. I got my family out of Europe several years ago because we saw what was coming now. Never Again.

That's the type of mistake that Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski made in backing OBL and the mujahideen against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. We all know how that turned out!

Sorry, but I consider Fascist Parties much the same as Socialist twit parties. The are much like the Tale of the Wolf and the Scorpion

Wait a minute! I was agreeing with you! I was saying that Carter and Brzezinski made the mistake of thinking that the enemy (Islamists) of their enemy (i.e., the Soviet Union) could be their friend. We are living with the consequences now and for the foreseeable future.

454 marjoriemoon  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:17:46pm

re: #405 newsjunkie_ky

That's what I've heard, but only 25% voted for Bush in '04. Makes no sense to me why Jews vote for dems who want us to be defeated by the islamofacists. But, most Jews are still democrats.

If 25% is correct, and I think that's a bit high, it's a HUGE number. 1 in 4? Jews support social causes which is why the majority are Dems. I don't know the percentages overall, but I would think it's a bit smaller. 15%-20% sounds better, but historically, it's a big shift.

455 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:17:47pm

re: #443 DesertSage

re: #435 canadianally

I reversed myself as soon as I could get my fingers back onto the keyboard! It's my turn for PIMF hell, I guess. Sorry!

(yeah, they do sort of hit both ends of the spectrum...problem is, left-right isn't an orthogonal axis)

456 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:17:52pm

re: #449 kiwiviv

If the answer it and Islamized Europe is fascism then fuck 'em.
/You can quote me on that.

457 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:18:01pm

re: #420 1389

That's the type of mistake that Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski made in backing OBL and the mujahideen against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. We all know how that turned out!

That is an astonishingly a-historical remark. Please review whatever you're basing it on.

458 father_of_10  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:18:48pm

OT but interesting:
Robert KKK Byrd's son-in-law is Mohammad Fatemi.

Hmmmmmmmmmmm?!?!?!?

459 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:19:06pm

re: #453 1389

re: #444 Jewels (AKA Julian)

re: #420 1389
re: #252 Jewels (AKA Julian)
Re: the Neo-Nazi's & Socialist Fascists"The Enemy of My Enemy...Is Still My Enemy". Sorry, no alliance with Fascists, thank you. I got my family out of Europe several years ago because we saw what was coming now. Never Again.
That's the type of mistake that Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski made in backing OBL and the mujahideen against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. We all know how that turned out!
Sorry, but I consider Fascist Parties much the same as Socialist twit parties. The are much like the Tale of the Wolf and the Scorpion
Wait a minute! I was agreeing with you! I was saying that Carter and Brzezinski made the mistake of thinking that the enemy (Islamists) of their enemy (i.e., the Soviet Union) could be their friend. We are living with the consequences now and for the foreseeable future.


erm....Oops. Do'h!

460 m  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:19:48pm

re: #440 Killgore Trout

...but I don't want to show up to an Anti-Islamist convention with Nazis and Skinheads.

This proves that the left is full of it with their "oh that's just the anarchist burning that soldier effigy, not us" thing. It doesn't go over very well when you are busing them in for the festivities (so you can use their head count).

So called "Reich-wingers" don't actually want the Reich at their party. That's the difference.

461 konservo  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:19:58pm

re: #440 Killgore Trout

re: #415 jeppo

We aren't debating Swedish internal politics here. We're debating whether or not the Swedish Democrats and Vlaam are worth accepting as allies into the Anti-Jihad family. Personally I couldn't care less about Swedish politics but I don't want to show up to an Anti-Islamist convention with Nazis and Skinheads.

Nor do I, and that's what it all boils down to for me.

462 jeppo[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:20:08pm
463 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:20:43pm

re: #455 Malatrope

You are addicted :P

/like I have room to talk

464 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:20:53pm

re: #422 Malatrope

No worries. I'm positively omnivorous in my interests; what I actually know, however, is very limited. And even then, I continually find myself astonished at the new things there are to know.

Soon, I'm going to have to vanish; I still haven't dealt with the cat-box, and the dogs haven't been walked. But I don't want to leave this.

465 Geepers  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:21:22pm

Thanos (#230),

That whole "you must become evil to fight evil" argument is specious bullshit rationalization.

That's very true.

Yet I can remember o so many times when people who said "we're better than them" were taken to task for being weak-kneed wussies who didn't have the WILL to fight back.

466 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:21:41pm

In Europe, anybody who questions immigration is called a racist. Their whole political dialogue is really quite alien to me. I have a tough enough time deciphering PC-speak here in North America, so I can't possibly intuit the nuances of Swedish political culture without at least a week of research.

To sum up, I don't know what I'm talking about (re Swedish culture or politics), but every effort should be made to preserve the good name of LGF because it is a critical resource. For me, a Canadian. LOL.

What do I know? Things are rotten in Europe and something has to happen before the point of no return. I'll leave it for smarter people than I to decide which relationships should be developed and which should be discarded.

However, tarnishing the name of LGF would do a greater disservice than anything at this point in time.

467 DesertSage  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:21:41pm

re: #455 Malatrope

I saw your correction long after I posted my comment.
You stand corrected.....and so do I :')

468 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:21:42pm

re: #457 Dianna

re: #420 1389

That's the type of mistake that Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski made in backing OBL and the mujahideen against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. We all know how that turned out!

That is an astonishingly a-historical remark. Please review whatever you're basing it on.

Huh? It's a historical fact that Brzezinski and Carter backed the Islamists against the Soviets in Afghanistan. They were so eager to get at the Soviets that they made a devil's bargain with the Islamists. Trouble is, that's where OBL got his start.

I realize that my grammar was horribly garbled here. But I was agreeing with Jewels (aka Julian). Carter and Brzezinski were mistaken in thinking that the enemy (Islamists) of their enemy (Soviets) could be their friend. Turned out badly, big time.

469 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:22:10pm

re: #456 Killgore Trout

re: #449 kiwiviv

If the answer it and Islamized Europe is fascism then fuck 'em.
/You can quote me on that.


Hmmmmm...The last time Europe was filled with Fascists, we all suffered. The same will happen again. So...I would rather not f 'em...we need to slap them until they come to sanity...maybe the Islamists will do the slapping for us.

470 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:22:28pm

Well, considering that it's only just since 2001 that the SD got rid of these guys, we can stand to be a little concerned.

Is there an analogy to the U.S. Democrats and the Dixiecrats here?

471 formercorpsman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:22:32pm

re: #451 Dianna

re: #418 formercorpsman

Fiction, as Ursula LeGuin pointed out years ago, is a way of examining the present. That comment has made me a much more aware reader, even of very slight things, over the years.

It also worries me about my own work, because I can't see it while I'm writing. To me, it's just a story, and it has me in its grip.

Isn't that always the case?

Goodnight, I'm tired, take it easy.

472 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:23:04pm

re: #425 Fjordman

Charles, I agree that some of the characteristics of you were grossly unfair, but I don't think your treatment of this has been entirely without problems, either. You didn't have to launch such a full-scale assault without even talking to the people and parties involved and listen to their side of the story.

My original post on this matter contained exactly four (4) sentences questioning the participation of Vlaams Belang and SD. And I even gave a link to the website of the SD, in the interest of fairness, and noted that some readers disagreed with my misgivings.

For that, I was viciously attacked by Pamela and others, and told that I was aligned with CAIR among other insulting and derogatory comments.

I didn't start this battle. I simply tried to raise some questions. But when people attack me, I will not take it lying down. The attacks prompted me to look more deeply into those parties, and the more I look, the more I find that confirms my original misgivings.

473 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:23:32pm

re: #425 Fjordman

Charles asked us all - particularly those who were at the conference - to take a good, hard look at who they were standing with.

Charles has been very balanced about this, and he's asked very good questions. He hasn't smeared anyone, he's asked for open debate.

Are we rational beings, or are we not?

474 Ringo the Gringo  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:23:37pm
As of early 2007 the party claims about 2,500 members.


Sweden has almost ten million people.

475 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:23:43pm

re: #462 jeppo

#440 Killgore Trout

Do you think Fjordman, Bat Ye'or, Andrew Bostom and, yes, Pamela Geller went to Brussels to hang out with Nazis and skinheads? Not bloody likely.

BTW Washington Times writer Diana West said the Vlaams Belang is the most pro-Israel European political party that she knows of. This after meeting Filip Dewinter, dismissed as a gutter nazi by so many here.

((((YIKES)))) If they really ARE the most pro-Israel European party, then things are worse than I feared! Has EVERYBODY sold out?

476 The Right Stuff  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:24:28pm
477 Malatrope  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:26:19pm

re: #463 Highrise

Trouble is, everytime I go to shut down, I scan up to see if people have replied to me, and I try to do them the courtesy of answering back. Truly, that is a formula for staying up until fruitcake time :)

Now I am going to go walk the dog, lock the doors, and hit the rack. At least I don't have to check for smoke...good luck, all you folks down in California who might be scanning this thread, and good night.

478 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:26:39pm

re: #437 1389

Um.

No. Stalin was the only alternative; he'd made sure of that.

479 Fjordman  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:26:43pm
I go to Norway from time to time - how do they rate as far as this totalitarianism you are talking about?

Not quite as bad as Sweden, at least we have one, sort of decent party we can vote for. But all of Western Europe is pretty bad, really.

Do the Swedish Democrats have a militant wing as it seems VB might?

No, but they have been assaulted by extreme Leftists frequently. Almost all over the EU, with the possible exception of East Germany, the violence comes from Muslims and extreme Leftists, such as this case:

[Link: gatesofvienna.blogspot.com...]

The Danish counterjihad organization SIAD planned a demonstration in Copenhagen last Sunday and announced it in advance. As a result, several of its members were waylaid and viciously attacked, in what may have been attempted murder.

480 pdogg  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:26:50pm

Apparently Ted Ekeroth won a Herzl Award from the World Zionist Organization. Anyone know anything about them? Were they duped?
This all seems twisted. Is he a Neo-Nazi or a Zionist? Most often you can tell the difference. This party can't be trusted if they are so inconsistent.

481 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:26:58pm

re: #462 jeppo

#440 Killgore Trout

Do you think Fjordman, Bat Ye'or, Andrew Bostom and, yes, Pamela Geller went to Brussels to hang out with Nazis and skinheads? Not bloody likely.

BTW Washington Times writer Diana West said the Vlaams Belang is the most pro-Israel European political party that she knows of. This after meeting Filip Dewinter, dismissed as a gutter nazi by so many here.

Nobody here has said that Filip's a nazi. I've said that I honestly think the leadership is trying to reform the parties. However not fast enough, not hard enough, and I see too many excuses and rationalizations. While the parties have good leadership today, some of their members are highly suspect, as are some of their activities in the political arena, see the links I posted.

That said, who's to say where or who the leadership will be coming from next year? They have many miles to go before they can sleep with my trust.

482 kafir  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:27:46pm

Paraphrasing A.C.C

Any racial hate group is indistinguishable from nazis.

Nazis everywhere deserve the derision heaped upon them for their irrational hatred.

Islamophobia is the very real, and very rational fear that someone following the traditional islamic interpretations will go medieval on your or your loved one's ass. Islam is not a race. It is a belief system.

A belief system that appears to incite hatred against groups that are not like them. A belief system that encourages hatred against jews, well known as anti-semitism. A totalitarian belief system, that brooks no dissent.

Did the Nazi's allow protesters?

The similarities are striking.

483 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:28:06pm

re: #455 Malatrope

re: #443 DesertSage

re: #435 canadianally

I reversed myself as soon as I could get my fingers back onto the keyboard! It's my turn for PIMF hell, I guess. Sorry!

(yeah, they do sort of hit both ends of the spectrum...problem is, left-right isn't an orthogonal axis)


Sorry, I started this with my quick post and a factual inaccuracy. LOL

484 ContraJihadi  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:28:26pm

re: #330 Charles

I've never been more glad to have been born an American than I am tonight.

Amen. The difference can be traced to the difference between two revolutions, the American and the French. The appeal to life, liberty, and the pursuit of (individual) happiness is a far cry from the demand for liberty, equality (in all things), and fraternity (of the folk). Add to Jefferson's genius a written constitution with an explicit bill of rights guaranteeing to the individual his freedom of expression and the means to enforce it, those incomparable First and Second Amendments, and there you have it in a nutshell.

485 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:28:31pm

re: #476 The Right Stuff

Operation Paperclip

Wernher von Braun

The US picked up a lot of operatives from Nazi intelligence, thinking they'd be useful against the Soviets. That backfired, for many reasons, not least of which was the fact that Stalin's moles had already penetrated Nazi intelligence. So we ended up importing Soviet moles into our own intelligence structure - and Soviet moles who had learned to act like Nazis, at that.

Funny thing... parents are always telling children to be careful not to associate with persons of bad character, and rightly so! What people forget is that it does even MORE damage when adults associate with persons of bad character, simply because adults have more power to do wrong!

486 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:30:00pm

re: #462 jeppo

Well then goosestep into you jackboots and get it over with. Good luck with that.

487 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:30:02pm

re: #479 Fjordman

I go to Norway from time to time - how do they rate as far as this totalitarianism you are talking about?

Not quite as bad as Sweden, at least we have one, sort of decent party we can vote for. But all of Western Europe is pretty bad, really.

Do the Swedish Democrats have a militant wing as it seems VB might?

No, but they have been assaulted by extreme Leftists frequently. Almost all over the EU, with the possible exception of East Germany, the violence comes from Muslims and extreme Leftists, such as this case:

[Link: gatesofvienna.blogspot.com...]

The Danish counterjihad organization SIAD planned a demonstration in Copenhagen last Sunday and announced it in advance. As a result, several of its members were waylaid and viciously attacked, in what may have been attempted murder.


Yes I saw that, it was atrocious. Since you can't carry guns I suggest cameras such as police dash cams always on if things like this go on. Is there more about it yet? Blak Bloc leftists, or Islamists? I know they ally sometimes.

488 Thanos  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:30:37pm

argg I really have to get some sleeps.. have to get back up at 3 am.

489 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:31:54pm

re: #475 1389

It seems so, the sell out isn't over yet. More to come.

490 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:32:37pm

re: #468 1389

Oh, dear.

Look, after I post this, I've got to walk dogs, deal with the cat box (shudder) and go to bed. But you're not at all right.

Re-read Charlie Wilson's War.

Who supported the mujahideen? Who made the old 'realpolitik' mistakes?

491 Yankee Division Son  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:32:41pm

I was once asked "is there such thing as a good Nazi?"

I thought hard about this, but could only come up with one name:


Oscar Schindler

492 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:32:50pm

re: #478 Dianna

re: #437 1389

Um.

No. Stalin was the only alternative; he'd made sure of that.

OTOH, there are always alternatives of some sort, as long as at least one other person exists in the world. Even the worst people need their supporters. There are rumors going around that disaffected and frightened underlings finally poisoned Stalin in 1953.

493 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:32:58pm

Who would Lars Vilks support?

494 so.cal.swede  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:35:12pm

Charles,


Here's my biggest gripe with Sweden Democrats.

When I grew up in Sweden, I got accustomed to the image of Sweden Democrats with a "Sweden for the Swedes" storefront. They were seen as a radical, racist, anti semitic, and neo-nazi group - and that was their platform. I've known quite a few people with outspoken antisemitic and racist views in Sweden who adored the Sweden Democrats.

Lately, it seems they are trying to whitewash their flecked facade, they have several documents, articles and communiques about supporting Jews, and fighting racism, etc, but here is where I get ponderous:

If you wanted to start a party that was
- clearly outspoken against racism.
- ran on issues like uncovering and fighting anti-semitism
- a strong proponent of a multicultural society.

Why in the WORLD would you take the infrastructure, members, and name of a party that was utterly dedicated to a racist and antisemitic agenda for most of its existance?

This seems like a poor attempt of a Jedi mind-trick to me.

If the SD are showing an anti-islamofacist interest, that's because their true colors are peering through the facade. They aren't interested in world peace, they hate foreigners, and that includes Jews.

My 2c

495 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:35:46pm

re: #490 Dianna

re: #468 1389

Oh, dear.

Look, after I post this, I've got to walk dogs, deal with the cat box (shudder) and go to bed. But you're not at all right.

Re-read Charlie Wilson's War.

Who supported the mujahideen? Who made the old 'realpolitik' mistakes?

No, Brzezinski admitted the entire thing in public. It's no secret. In fact, he still thinks it was worth it. He's wrong. The Soviet Union could have been defeated without the Afghanistan War.

496 JeremyR  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:35:57pm

re: #434 father_of_10

Having a nazi past shouldn't be a problem. A KKK past didn't hurt our esteemed senator from West Virginia, Mr. Byrd.

That's because he belongs to the dems, they now stand for nothing and fall for anything. Look at what they have encompassed, From Phreaky Phreddy Phelps to out and out communists like Kerry, idiots like Swimmer, and their #2 candidate is a lightweight antiamerican whinnabe.

497 Killgore Trout  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:37:15pm

re: #494 so.cal.swede

Nice one.

498 canadianally  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:38:31pm

Politician's girlfriend bound with duct tape

Politician's girlfriend bound with duct tape
Published: 16th August 2007 08:17 CET
Online: [Link: www.thelocal.se...]

The girlfriend of a leading Sweden Democrat politician was attacked on Wednesday at the couple's home in Bromma in west Stockholm.

Late in the afternoon the 19-year-old woman was found bound with duct tape in a stairwell of the apartment block where she lives with Martin Kinnunen, chairman of the youth wing of the far-right Sweden Democrats.

499 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:38:39pm

Correction: my original post contained three sentences questioning the participation of VB and SD.

500 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:39:06pm

re: #492 1389

After looking at the evidence, I doubt it. Certainly, Stalin's death was a relief, particularly to Molotov, Malenkov and Beria; Probably to Kruschev, as well. But no, they didn't conspire to kill him.

However, when a nearly 80 year old man has a stroke, and spends hours on the floor, and, when discovered, is only moved to a bed and no doctor is summoned for hours...well, that verges on murder.

501 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:40:30pm

re: #494 so.cal.swede

Thanks for that. It supports the comments I've received from other Swedish readers.

502 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:41:19pm

re: #446 Killgore Trout

re: #424 Irene NYC

I think that's why groups like Swedish Dems and Vlaams have come to compromise on Israel. Their Jewish problem has been transfered to the Middle East and they're content with that.

And it's not uncommon as I said earlier for ethnic separatists to support the idea of various groups having their own "lands." It does seem difficult for Europeans, and perhaps understandably so, to define nationality in other than ethnic terms. Here in the U.S. we're not surprised to find Americans of all kinds because although there is an American heritage and culture, there's not really a particular American ethnicity. In Europe, these people have to deal with different languages every few hundred miles, so there's a tendency to view nationality and ethnicity as one and the same. The Swedish Democrats seem to be working towards some concept of what it means to be Swedish other than tying it strictly to ethnicity.

But of course this is not just a European problem. I'd say very few countries in the world have a concept of nationality like the Americans do. You can't just move to Japan and become Japanese, to cite one glaring non-European example.

503 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:42:13pm

re: #495 1389

I'm forgetting my promise to head for bed, damnit.

You completely misunderstand what happened in Afghanistan, and the time-line. Zbignew's memoirs are not (how shall I put this?) entirely non-self-serving.

504 Promethea  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:42:17pm

re: #11 avideditorla.com

I read the documents and I applaud there stance. But I believe everything needs to be taken in context. I have seen other things about the party that disgust me. I just hope there party moves forward in there anti-islamofascist aims, while crushing the fascist elements in its own ranks. I personally can not give a decision on the party now, but if the party continues its positive aspects and discontinues its negative aspects for a couple of year, then I could see myself supporting the party.

Thanks Charles for showing both sides of the story.

Charles is doing us great service by enabling us to view the various sides of an issue.

Since 9/11, when I became engaged with the world after a brief hiatus, I've been struck the by almost total inability of supposedly reasonable people to have a reasoned discussion. Generally, people sink into insults and name-calling as soon as they see that the person they're arguing with refuses to agree with them.

In fact, I have been so disturbed by the inability of my BDS-infected peers to have a reasonable discussion, I began work on a book called "Reviving the Art of Conversation." This book would NOT be about hearing the exploits of your adorable grandchildren, some restaurant where they have the BEST Tex-Mex food, or your latest trip to Tuscany. It would be about discussing the Iranian Menace, the Future of Cuba, and why Hollywood has gone to the Dogs, etc. etc. etc.

It's very hard to have a real conversation these days. I don't know why, but that's a fact. That's why I'm a lizardoid. I like the discussions.

505 Geepers  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:42:18pm

Fjordman (#425),

Charles, I agree that some of the characteristics of you were grossly unfair, but I don't think your treatment of this has been entirely without problems, either. You didn't have to launch such a full-scale assault without even talking to the people and parties involved and listen to their side of the story.

Wow. Talk about misrepresenting the facts.

506 1389  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:42:29pm

re: #428 marwan's daughter

re: #399 rappmandu

Interesting thread. I'm glad we're having this discussion. There are too many who simply swallow the whole enemy of my enemy is my friend, without considering the implications before entering into alliances, political coalitions, etc.

For example, India is an ally in the GWOT, but there are definitely groups we should be wary of. Shiva Sena, RSS, etc. Now, if one or more of those groups takes power or is part of a governing coalition, how does that impact bilateral ties?

Glad you brought that up. Here is an example of how bad the Hindu fascists can be: Bajrang Dal (which is another Hindu fascist party like Shiv Sena) official confesses he slaughtered Muslims during the Godhra riots in Gujarat, and loved it.

English translation here.

Reminds me of something: I'm an Orthodox Christian. We are not pacifists; we pray for our country and its armed services. But when I was learning about the faith, I remember reading that it is considered a sin to take pleasure in killing.

507 Da_Beerfreak  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:43:56pm

re: #484 ContraJihadi

Just to pick a couple of very large nits.
1.) James Madison wrote the Constitution. (Jefferson was in France at the time of the convention.)
2.) The Constitution as originally written did not have a bill of rights, (See George Mason's objections to the Constitution.)
3.) The Bill of Rights was added after the Constitution was ratified by The States.

508 Dianna  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:44:44pm

re: #502 Dar ul Harb

Before I go to bed, you just reminded me of a favorite quote:

A language is a dialect with a standing army.

- Erasmus of Rotterdam.

And now to bed!

Or at least to walk the dogs and deal with the cat-box (shudder).

509 marjoriemoon  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:44:55pm

re: #472 Charles

I didn't start this battle. I simply tried to raise some questions. But when people attack me, I will not take it lying down. The attacks prompted me to look more deeply into those parties, and the more I look, the more I find that confirms my original misgivings.

The old cliche holds true. Politics makes strange bedfellows. Of course, the Nazis detest anything that isn't them. Certainly that isn't white (which includes all Semitic races) and I think, btw, they regard themselves as Christians of some fashion or other which is also pretty blasphemous in today's world. But isn't that also the basis for any nationalist party? You can't "celebrate your race" as it were without thinking others are inferior. So really, I don't get those in the S.D. who say they aren't racists... or maybe they're just a "little" racist. Or maybe I need more education in the nationalist movement.

510 Dave the.....  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:45:12pm

Interesting thread. I've been light on LGF lately. See a lot of new posters (including those from Europe). Charles is activite tonight.

Wonder if the group in question is like the communists in the US, where they take up a respectable cause as a front. Recall the head communist Gus Hall wrote a book about racism. Imagine that.

511 marjoriemoon  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:49:16pm

re: #494 so.cal.swede

Why in the WORLD would you take the infrastructure, members, and name of a party that was utterly dedicated to a racist and antisemitic agenda for most of its existance?

You said that SO much better than I did! Thank you.

512 allahakchew  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:51:33pm

re: #403 1389

re: #264 allahakchew


I just have a hard time with this and feel very uncomfortable.
I keep thinking back about the Muslim Brotherhood/Nazi connections that started years ago.

snip
Nazi Islam


Heinrich Himmler, Head of SS, and close colleague of Amin Al-Husseini, financed and established Islamic Institute (‘Islamische Zentralinstitut’) in Dresden under the Mufti. The purpose was to create a generation of Islamic leaders that would continue to use Islam as a carrier for Nazi ideology into the 21st century. [xxxv]

[Link: www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com...]

My point exactly.

Thank you!

513 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:52:07pm

re: #503 Dianna

Diana,

What you mean is that Brezinski is a big fat liar.

Now, go walk that dog!

514 Emperor Bob  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:55:35pm

There is absolutely no parallel to be made between the GWOT and WWII, as far as our situation is concerned. Please.
Plus if you start thinking about it:
Popular opinion often sided in favor of the nazis against the communists before the second world war.
Then we helped the communists against the Nazis.
Then we helped a bunch of dictators if they were willing to reject the soviet influence (Franco, Pinochet and pals).
Then the Iranian republic rises: Who's our helper in the region, fighting them off? Saddam Hussein.
And who are we helping to beat the Soviets in Afghanistan? OBL.

Can we learn from our mistakes, dammit? We have the military capacity to resist and squash any aggressor, we don't need to go multi-lateral anymore, at least not alongside evil scum. I don't mind taking them on one at a time, instead of all at once, but it's the only compromise we need to make.

And Fjordman, I think a mistake is made in linking anti-Islamofascism and anti-immigration views. The first one is sometimes a front for the other, but it hardly ever goes in the other direction.
Right now, most countries have a ridiculous "amount based" immigration policy, in which your likelihood of being given residency depends on how many people from your country have made an application in the same year. Some years we block otherwise decent candidates because they're the 10 001 applicant, other times we run green-card lotteries for nationalities which have not reached their "quotas". This is because the populist anti-immigration argument is based on faulty economics of limited resources and the idea that immigration is, as a rule, a drain on resources and a thing we do out of charity. One side says kick the bums out, the other says we have a moral duty to immigrants.
Something that's been missing from the debate, even in the US, is that immigration of working non-criminals is, as a rule rather than an exception, a net positive. Before the First World War, immigration in most countries was almost entirely free, and they had substantially less problems with integration than today, even if immigration was, in proportion to population, 5 to 6 times higher than it is today. The problem is that in Europe, and the United States (and Canada and so on...) We have focused too much on reducing the total amount of immigrants, than on the real problem, which has nothing to do with the number of immigrants, and everything to do with what kind of immigrants our 'something for nothing' social safety nets and programs attract (and even with this effect, immigration is still a positive in the US)

If you want a rational analysis of the economic impacts of immigration in the united states, you should read economist Julian Simon's work on this subject -he was one of the few voices of sanity back during the overpopulation panic-. The book is entirely available on the internet, however it does not contain the charts and graphs of the printed version.

Two last things about Europe's future:
1. Muslims don't need to be 51% of the population for there to be trouble, there only needs to be more of them willing to passively or actively defend the thugs amongst them than there are of everyone else ready to put an end to it.
2. Native Europeans are so spineless, or insane (or both), that perhaps part of the solution is to encourage immigration from other, more ideologically friendly places (India and Singapore, as well as Eastern Europe spring to mind, but basically any place that puts an emphasis on individual success and responsibility will do). Part of why the US has much less problems with the Muslims is that they are only a fraction of all other immigrants, who are not gonna let themselves be bullied.
I look at the new governor of Louisiana, and I see the fix to our problems. It's got nothing to do with the nationalists of Europe, or the Lou Dobbs/Maginot Line crowd in America.

515 m  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:56:36pm

.re: #505 Geepers

Yeah, that one is ass backwards.

516 jwbaumann  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:57:09pm

re: #213 Charles

In fact, I'm making that decision easy for "june_july" and blocking its account.

Very politely asking brief audience of the great lizard master with hat in hand....

I fully recognize that this is your blog, with your rules, and you can choose to enforce them as you see fit.

} } } however { { {

june_july had some rational thoughts mixed in with some careless ones (wrong? misdirected? misperceived?). I'd hate to think that a careless posting could get me banned because, even though I sometimes disagree with some posts (and even to some degree on rare occasion with you, oh great lizard master), I find the general tone to be quite positive and useful, and, heck, I kinda think of LGF as home. And as George Bernard Shaw so wisely said, "Home is that place where, when you get there, they have to take you in."

If I ever got banned I'd have a hard time facing all my friends whom I have directed to LGF. I might even have a grief reaction, which I don't really need right now.

Michael Yon is willing to give Scott Beauchamp a second chance. In recognition of his empathic generosity, I ask you to consider a second chance for june_july.

And I thank you for your generous lizard consideration.

518 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:59:36pm

re: #516 jwbaumann

Anyone who thinks this site encourages "white supremacists" is not welcome. That's not "careless," it's insulting.

519 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 9:59:50pm

re: #511 marjoriemoon

And if you were going to have a Pan-European alliance of nationalist parties why would you want the same name as a nudist resort? Or vice versa...

"Don't be stupid
be a smarty
come and join
the nekkid party!"
--Mel Brooks, The Producers, paraphrased

520 ContraJihadi  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:02:31pm

re: #507 Da_Beerfreak

re: #484 ContraJihadi

Just to pick a couple of very large nits.
1.) James Madison wrote the Constitution. (Jefferson was in France at the time of the convention.)
2.) The Constitution as originally written did not have a bill of rights, (See George Mason's objections to the Constitution.)
3.) The Bill of Rights was added after the Constitution was ratified by The States.

Do tell! You are quite certain that I claimed that Jefferson wrote the constitution, that the original constitution included a bill of rights? You might want to reread my post. You will find that I only said that the constitution was added to Jefferson's genius. Amendments are commonly understood to be subsequent additions; that is how I understand them.

May I hope that my point about the difference between the American Revolution and the French isn't similarly infested?

/clearing nits lest they become fleas

521 realwest  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:02:46pm

re: #473 Dianna "Are we rational beings, or are we not?"
I suspect that depends on what your definition of "we" is.
I have read this entire thread and am as confused as ever about the Sweden Democrats, who they are and what they stand for.
I originally got involved in Pamela's attack on Charles because for her to say that Charles has aligned himself (or CAIR has aligned itself with Charles) is absurd on it's face and I do not believe she actually apologized to Charles for saying that (even if Charles did in accepting her apology).
What I do know is that the overwhelming majority of comments on this thread are anti-Nazi, anti-skin head and anti - antisemites.
Charles was kind enough to publish the documents sent to him by the Sweden Democrats and offer them up to us for analysis and debate and NO ONE could ask Charles to be more fair than that.
Yes, unfortunately, there are some folks who claim LGF is a Hate Site. I've never met ONE of them who had even read LGF or if they did all they saw was discussions against Islamofascists and claimed that that made us a racist site (never mind the fact that Islam is not a race, it's true but irrelevant for my purposes here).
Charles has read these documents as have I and I suspect as have most of the LGFers out here. And, like Charles, I remain skeptical. I will NEVER support Nazi's, neo-Nazi's, anti-Semites or those who wish harm to Israel. Nor will I ever, nor could I ever, jump into bed with them, no matter the danger from Islamofascism. They will have to convince me with their actions that they are not anti-semitic and that they have in fact purged all the Nazi's or Neo-Nazi's from their midst before I could bring myself to seriously consider supporting them.
IF we become just like our enemy, or ally ourselves with those just like our enemy, then we have already lost.
And I refuse to lose.

522 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:03:15pm
523 josephjcox  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:06:32pm

re: #29 Dave the.....

I thought IKEA was from Denmark.

524 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:08:14pm

re: #517 Geepers

If you don't know how to do it
I'll show ya how to walk the dog.

Asked my momma for 15 cent
to see tha elephant jump the fence
He jumped so high
He touched the sky
Never got back till the 4th of July

Ah, Rufus.

525 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:08:25pm

re: #523 josephjcox

re: #29 Dave the.....

I thought IKEA was from Denmark.

You're joking...right?

526 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:08:34pm

re: #523 josephjcox

I thought IKEA was from Denmark.

/nope

527 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:08:42pm

re: #497 Killgore Trout

You beat me to it.

528 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:09:08pm

re: #523 josephjcox

re: #29 Dave the.....

I thought IKEA was from Denmark.

That's an insult to all serious shoopers!

529 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:09:42pm

The lgfwatch stalkers are gibbering and drooling and gloating over all this, naturally.

530 kiwiviv  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:10:26pm

re: #529 Charles

The lgfwatch stalkers are gibbering and drooling and gloating over all this, naturally.

Drooling is becoming on these suckers

531 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:10:29pm
532 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:10:40pm

Another good Rufus Thomas song: The World Is Round

533 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:11:22pm

Well, in the last of the links above, the claim is made that Ted Ekeroth was given the Herzl Award by the Swedish Zionist Federation. So, I did a Web search for Herzl Award:Herzl Award Winners, 2006

Somehow, I cannot see this organization giving an award to a Nazi, or to someone who willingly associates with Nazis.

It does appear that the Sweden Democrat party has had members in the past with Nazi affiliations, but seemingly they have been purged from the party.

I could certainly see self-styled Nazis joining a nationalist party, with a view to either seizing control of that party, or simply to discredit that party and leave the real Nazi party in sole possession of that end of the political spectrum. I could also see leftists, posing as Nazis, joining a rightist party as mobies simply to discredit it. We are all too familiar with leftists smearing anyone they disagree with as Nazis, after all.

As far as I am concerned, the jury is still out.

534 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:12:36pm

re: #529 Charles

All three or four of them?

/If a tree falls in a forest . . .

535 Sharmuta  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:12:53pm

re: #529 Charles

That's really sad- you've taken a strong stance against hate, and they still come after you. It's very telling that they would continue to attack the man and not the positions you've taken. Talk about obsessive.

536 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:12:57pm

The world is round
But it's crooked just the same
And you'll never never know
Just what man there is to blame

537 poteen  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:13:37pm

re: #521 realwest

Bullseye

538 stevieray  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:14:28pm

Lizard Roger posted a link a few threads down that bears on this debate.

[Link: www.timesonline.co.uk...]

This article about Belgium has nasty implications for the future of Europe, and clearly shows the determination of the political elites to suppress any non open border multi-culti views.


The banned party is Vlaams Blok (VB). The Court of Appeal in Ghent — notorious for its left-liberal bias — deemed it to be an “undemocratic and racist” organisation because of its policy that immigrants should be given only two choices: “to assimilate or to return home”

.

Faced with this kind of political reality, the odds of Europe ever being at peace again drop to near zero. If the viewpoint that immigrants should assimilate or leave is so absolutely abhorrent to the senses that a political party, even an ugly one, can be banned from nearly all types of advertising, then things are every bit as bad as Fjordman says they are.

If those views are beyond the pale, then it would be easy to beat them back with words. The fact that Belgium reacted this strongly to that simple phrase... "assimilate or leave", indicates they fear it and don't think they can stop it through legitimate means.

The elites of Europe have cast their lot with the multiculturalists, and they are digging their heels in. I think they won't change, no matter how many their policies hurt. Its gonna get violent over there... sooner than most think.

539 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:15:00pm
540 leepro  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:17:04pm

re: #384 Killgore Trout

re: #374 Randman

No, that's how I read Jeepro's comment....

If Fjordman gives the Sweden Democrats the thumbs up, that's all I need to know to support them.


OT (but not)

Killgore, his nic is jeppo. Mine is leepro. I think you've confused the two.

;)

541 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:20:02pm

re: #472 Charles


My original post on this matter contained exactly four (4) sentences questioning the participation of Vlaams Belang and SD. And I even gave a link to the website of the SD, in the interest of fairness, and noted that some readers disagreed with my misgivings.

For that, I was viciously attacked by Pamela and others, and told that I was aligned with CAIR among other insulting and derogatory comments.

I didn't start this battle. I simply tried to raise some questions. But when people attack me, I will not take it lying down. The attacks prompted me to look more deeply into those parties, and the more I look, the more I find that confirms my original misgivings.


What is disgusting is all the facts are laid out there starting with the atlas thread and still today you have had to go into multiple threads to set the record straight. Some people are completely going out of their way to not read the facts and make their own up due to agendas or emotion, spinning this into something it isn't. Some of these people I notice even go so far to take up bullying anyone who begins to back you (as expected).

/keep shining the light...the ones that are interested in facts, will see this exposed.

542 realwest  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:20:20pm

re: #529 Charles I can't say this in any more straitforward way than this : Fuck the lgfwatch stalkers. As I said in my # 521, you published the document from them, asked us to read and analyize them and we did so. I dare say that there have been very few comments in support of the Sweden Dems, and even less in support of Nazism, Neo-Nazism or Anit-Semitism and most of those were made by commenter's whom you've banned.
I've actually managed to stay awake long enough to read this entire thread and I think it's as fine an example of people being asked to review and discuss certain documents, blog posts and the like that one could ever hope to see in the blogsphere. In full and fair debates, feathers sometimes get ruffled, so what?
I will only reiterate my attitude about the lgfwatch stalkers without quoting myself. If they are drooling over this it's either because THEY don't run blogs that allow such tremendous freedom of speech and debate or they've been drinking too much Kool-Aid, or both.

543 stevieray  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:22:08pm

Darn it! How does it get so late so fast? Its bedtime... thanks for the fascinating debate. Goodnight!

544 descolada9  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:22:34pm

Well, Charles, if the Pulitzer had any value left to it, then I would definitely say that you deserve one for all of the work that you have done over the past few years. Thanks :)

545 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:27:24pm

re: #544 descolada9

Oh goodness descolada9, why would you want to sully Charles' reputation with a Pulitzer?
;)

546 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:28:14pm

re: #545 Irene NYC

Perhaps it is time to create an award that actually means something and give it to Charles and other good bloggers like him hehe.

547 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:29:59pm

Give him a state! ;)

548 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:30:38pm
549 Irene NYC  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:30:45pm

re: #546 Highrise

That would be nice. I saw some list of the top 100 blogs today and LGF wasn't on it. Can you imagine?
:(

550 Dar ul Harb  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:31:11pm

Ah, but which one?

I think he could do a lot to improve politics in Hawaii.

551 Emperor Bob  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:34:56pm

re: #550 Dar ul Harb

Ah, but which one?

I think he could do a lot to improve politics in Hawaii.

Why, give him Sweden.

552 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:35:26pm

I'll take Hawaii.

553 Highrise  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:37:09pm

re: #549 Irene NYC

re: #546 Highrise

That would be nice. I saw some list of the top 100 blogs today and LGF wasn't on it. Can you imagine?
:(


Yeah. I notice that magazines I sub to don't make even a radar blip on any list. I guess mainstream in anything, in short, sucks!

554 Victor[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:41:26pm
555 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:44:39pm

re: #554 Victor

What the hell is that supposed to mean?

556 Victor  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:46:22pm

Parody.

557 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:46:34pm

I will preface this by saying that Ikea has stores in Israel, but also in arab countries.

The owner has nazi ties...and is also now one of the richest men on the planet.

Here is his history, in al-Guardian, of all places.

From what I remember over the years post-WWII? Too many Swedes also admired the nazis, and to find out that Holland also did? And Switzerland, too.

And both Switzerland and Holland are of Germanic heritage. Sweden I am not sure about.

After reading so much on this the past few days? I want to thank Charles from the bottom of my heart for bringing this to our attention, and for standing his ground, in addition to fact checking his tush relentlessly.

Charles is right. And Pamela has dug herself into a hole that she seems to enjoy being in, as there is another LGF hate comment that passed muster with her.

Thank you again Charles.

558 Charles  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:50:25pm

That's it? "Parody?"

OK. Then I'm indulging in some parody of my own and blocking your account.

559 June_July  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:57:01pm

Charles listened to my explanation and apology and has kindly unblocked me, and I thank him for that.

Please let me explain what I was trying to say, but said so badly that it was mistaken for - on one hand, me accusing LGF of supporting white supramcists and me being "KOS sleeper", and on the other hand I was accused of jew hatred.

Neither could be further from the truth. I just wrote my point badly and hastily. So, I will try again and hopefully people will believe that this is what I was trying to say.

The point I had been trying to make in my earlier disasterous post was that when right wingers gather, the fringe lunatics see it as a place where they might find a more sympathetic ear. I have never seen Charles tolerate that kind of person.

I was trying to defend places like Brussel Journal, where there are good people who try to fight against Islamization, but are tarred by the presence in the same forum of some who have a much uglier world view. If people here ever visit that site, they will know what I mean. Still, Europe is the site where the battle is being waged to a very large extent. The anti-Islamization people in Europe face a more immediate threat thanwe do, and they have my respect for fighting in a much worse environment than we have to endure. I do not want these people to think that they do not have our support, or that we have tarred them ALL with the brush of racism and hatefulness based on the history of SOME.

A battle between well intentioned anti-Islamization groups on either site of the Atlantic serves only the Jihadis. That's why I said, at the end of my post: "Somehow we have to support the good, weed out the bad, and not toss them all in the same junk heap".

Did I succeed in making the point without offending?

560 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:58:06pm

re: #557 NY Nana

I will preface this by saying that Ikea has stores in Israel, but also in arab countries.

The owner has nazi ties...and is also now one of the richest men on the planet.

Oh, really? Sweden collaborated officially with the Nazis, her neutrality was anything but.

/WWII is over, you want the IKEA founder in the Hague?

561 Render  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 10:58:15pm

A couple of quick historical points...

We, (The US), most certainly did confront Stalin after the fall of Berlin. Stalin would assuredly have driven to the Atlantic had not the other three Allied armies stood in his path. We also confronted Stalin by refusing to allow the Russians to join the occupation of Japan.

But the Korean War, beginning just five years after the end of WW2, was the most confrontational of all.

The North Koreans did not sign the armistice until after Stalins death.

===

More recently...(and one more time for those with difficulty understanding the obvious).

We did not support OBL's tiny little faction of Mujahaden, even during the brief period when they were actually actively operating in the field against the Soviets. They, and OBL, would not have accepted US aid even had it been offered, nor did they need it in the areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan that they operated in. And still do...

THE
PROGRAM,
R

562 lennysquiggy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:08:04pm

Charles,

I'm a little confused as to why you're worried about Neo-Nazis who oppose Islamofascism... Opposing Islamofascism is akin to hating cancer, disliking death and wanting to end AIDS. Just because a Nazi opposes some universally awful things doesn't make him a good person.

And most importantly, it doesn't make YOU a bad person because you also oppose those awful things.

Let the Nazis alone and they will expose themselves for who they are. Giving them any attention will only help two groups - the Neo-Nazis and the Leftist Dhimmis who would love nothing more than to mislabel LGF.

563 Killian Bundy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:11:29pm

re: #560 Killian Bundy

And now that my memory's been jogged, I can see where some Swedes are getting their Nazi inspiration, it hasn't been that many generations.

/historically, the country has a past and children learn from it and their parents

564 snowtravel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:12:25pm

re: #518 Charles

Charles, if anyone here were unclear about your stand on racism, anti-Semitism or white-supremicism, you've set the record straight. Certainly I've seen nothing to suggest your support of such hateful elements, ever.

Having said that, with all due respect I think you may have misunderstood JJ's post.

Perhaps I'm granting too much, but I took the language "really fine people, obvious racists and anti-semites, and white-supremacists" to be ironical. In other words, JJ was lamenting the perceived existence of those elements, not seeking to befriend them here. That the perception is wrong doesn't mean it doesn't exist. However insulting, the observation of a falsehood is still the truth.

The battle lies in fighting falsehood, not banning those who see it.

565 Render  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:12:53pm

re: #562 lennysquiggy

Because in this case, the neo-nazi's of Europe are desperately seeking somebody stronger to protect them from a problem they bear a large responsibility in creating.

TOUGH,
R

566 poteen  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:13:47pm

re: #552 Charles

New FAQ"s

Where you gonna put the nitrogen chamber?

Do lizards get lei'd?

567 snowtravel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:16:09pm

And after spending 20 minutes on it, I see my effort is superfluous.

Welcome back, JJ.

568 June_July  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:21:15pm

OK. I've stuck around in case I had to clarify anything else, but it's 2:15 and I gotta get up for work tomorrow today at 5:30.

Thank you to Snowtravel and JWBaumann for defending me and recognizing that I was careless with my words. Thanks to Charles for giving me a chance to explain. Apologies all around.

And good night.

569 lennysquiggy  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:22:13pm
Because in this case, the neo-nazi's of Europe are desperately seeking somebody stronger to protect them from a problem they bear a large responsibility in creating.

But that is the point I am trying to make. Just because they are seeking validation doesn't mean you have to repudiate them. Just ignore them. They are worthless. Giving them any response is playing into the hands of the dhimmified left. They are the same today as they were last week/month/year - that shouldn't change just because they want allies. Screw 'em.

Just out of curiosity, how did the neo-Nazis create the problem of Islamofascism in Europe? Oh... the Nazi/Arab thing in WWII... Gotcha. I literally figured that out as I typed this paragraph. Good point.

570 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:22:36pm
571 June_July  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:22:37pm

Thanks Snowtravel. That was a stressful hour....glad to be back.

572 NY Nana  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:27:59pm

G'nite, all! A bit after 2 AM here.

Killgore, I am too tired to engage in verbal fisticuffs. Sweet dreams.

Trying him at the Hague? Great sense of humor, Killgore.

There are far bigger fish that escaped justice. He is but a minor example, a tadpole in contrast, and will have to answer to G-d one day. A far more relevent judgement will be meted out.

That he did collaborate is not in doubt, and that he came from a family of nazi lovers? Screw him. I just saw this, from you:

/historically, the country has a past and children learn from it and their parents

Sadly, too true.

Try telling the survivors, the few that are left to bear witness, and their descendants, who also live with what was done to the Jews that it is past, so just forget about it. There have been studies done, and even the grandchildren have been adversely affected. It is there 24/7.

As someone, who like Charles is so very grateful to have been born in the USA, I can only wish each and every day, that the family members HY"D who were not so blessed had been able to come here..alas, they were murdered for the crime of being Jewish, as were Christians.

However, the goal was to kill all the Jews in Europe.

Never forget. Never forgive.

573 Render  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:31:29pm

re: #569 lennysquiggy

:)

I'm glad you caught on too that. But there is another reason as well. That whole "final solution" thing. They, more than any other political group, made Europe as Jew free as they could get away with, and Islam came creeping in to fill the vacuum. With the Fall of the Wall, the creeping became a torrent, a tidal wave of population migration.

There are far better people in Europe to ally with, to save as it were.

LET
EM
BURN,
R

574 June_July  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:37:36pm

Looks like I am not getting any sleep tonight...

I am not sure of your point Song and Dance... As you say, people all fight in their own way. I fight by posting the anti-Jihad message on probably a dozen different sites, by debating the leftards and apologists for Islam, by trying to keep the debates and posts rational and not hysterical (and hence not credible), and I OFTEN find myself appalled by stupid rabid posts that discredit the cause. I fight by supporting (through paypal) writers like Michael Yon, and sites like LGF and others. I fight by trying to raise awareness of the issues with frirends, and family, even though they sometimes look at me like I am a freak.

I can't fight by attending demonstrations and taking a risk that my head will get cracked by anarchists in Europe, or by trying to deal with the EU dictatorship that is actively trying to smother all dissent. But there are people doing it over there, good people who want the same things for their society as we do for ours, and if they win their battles our battles will be easier. I want to support them.

And yes, there are others, who have uglier motives but wish to co-opt the anti-Islamization movement, who need to be identified and cast out. But there is a mood that, to my eyes, seem like people want to reject all the European anti-Islamic group, based on the concern about a fraction of them.

What does that have to do with me not "trusting the truth"? What truth is that? As you way, we all combat the threat in our own way.

575 snowtravel  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:53:17pm

re: #570 song_and_dance_man

I'm going to defend JJ here not because I know JJ and I agree on everything but because you've assumed you disagree. Why?

Fact is, you don't know where JJ is coming from. Let JJ speak: the speaker's obligation is to make his point clear.

Let's listen: the listener's obligation is to hear, and it's ever the harder job.

576 profitsbeard  Thu, Oct 25, 2007 11:57:40pm

Why should the Anti-Jihad Resistance be linked with any pre-existing political groups or parties?

Let people join it as free individuals uniting in a wholly new gathering for this unique and vital cause.

Let them leave their previous, smaller affiliations behind, since they are irrelevant to this effort, if not injurious to it.

This is not a collective of groups, but a universal movement to defend human liberty and dignity against an intolerant, misogynistic theocratic fascism.

Swedes? Democrats? Jews? Whites? Gays? Blacks? Atheists? Christians? Americans? Europeans? Asians? Australians? Buddhists? Left? Right? Conservative? Liberal? Male? Female?

All unimportant distinctions in the face of this global threat to all of us, and to all of our freedoms.

Time to put away the trivia in the face of dogmatic terror.

This sword is coming for every neck that will not bow.

I oppose all forms of tyranny over the mind.

That should be the bond.

Nothing less.

577 theheat  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:04:20am

This whole Swedish Democrat sect sorta reminds me of that little incident near Crawford called Camp Casey. Although it grew from anti-war sentiment from one [idiot] mother who lost her son, every psycho element in the country seemed to gravitate toward it and become absorbed into the collective because some particular aspect of the anti-war/anti-Bush message appealed to them. Code Pink, Nazis, communists, new age Black Panthers, hard core moonbats, Troofers, hippies, Viet Nam vets - it offered something for everyone. Simply hating Bush, it seemed, was the only cost of admission.

You have to ask yourself just who you are willing to align yourself with before you have compromised what you truly believe in, because at some point your fundamental differences will come back to bite you in the ass.

As they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

578 Live4Truth  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:23:49am

O.k., well, I've carefully and thoughtfully read through everything. My read of it:

Of the documents which Mr. Ekeroth sent, I agree nearly 100%, and that says a lot (I rarely agree that much with anybody, including myself).

Of the controversies mentioned on Wikipedia, it sounds like there are a lot of Nazis in Sweden, and they join the Sweden Democrats party from time to time, because they share some of the same goals, despite the fact that SD is absolutely opposed to many things which the Nazis believe. And so, SD kicks them out "when they are discovered", but that's usually after they "come out of the closet" so to speak, and do so in the name of SD, thus giving SD a bad name.

Bottom line, I may be missing something, but I'm going to give a thumbs up to SD, but that would be immediately repealed if any antisemites, racists, nazis, white power, or other similar nut cases were allowed to remain in any way connected with SD, after coming out of the closet.

579 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:26:02am
580 song_and_dance_man[deleted]  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:32:06am
581 Render  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:42:02am

re: #578 Live4Truth

That would be the problem. They're still connected. Both parties.

HENCE,
R

582 Truumax  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:00:37am

Aw man, I was asleep and missed the whole debate on this one.

Oh well, might as well throw in my two cents.

[Link: expo.se...]

This is an article that was widely circulated in swedish media a month or so ago. It's an analysis of what the Sweden Democrats who were elected into office have actually done since the election, one year ago. The answer?

Nothing.

In more than half of the territories they were elected into, the Sweden Democrat representatives have not suggested a single piece of legislation, participated in any debates, discussed budgets etc. Just complete and utter silence. And don't make the mistake of thinking this is because they're small-government-principialists making a stand; they're not. the SD is very much about government intervention in social matters and maintaining big welfare projects.

The article also asks a swedish political historian for comments, and her take on it is the same as mine:

"It supports my view that the Sweden Democrats are a single-issue party who don't have a complete political platform. In regional politics, a vote for them is a vote thrown away. Although it might be an important vote to signify your discontent with the swedish immigration policy."

I've said it in earlier comment threads as well: Immigration issues are the only thing these guys really care about, the rest is just glued on to make them look good. And when they don't have a platform where they can work with immigration, they don't know what to do at all. Just... completely incompetent.

I've read up a bit on Tommy Funebo as well, the party secretary who left in 2004. His stance is that the upper echelons of the party are split between hardline racists, and more sane and collected people. As a result, the party hardly even discusses immigration internally, out of fear that discussions would create schizms and division in the party.

My stance is exactly the same now as it's been all along: I will never trust a word that any of them tell me. I don't care how nice they say they are nowadays. They're thugs.

583 Live4Truth  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:04:03am

re: #581 Render

re: #578 Live4Truth

That would be the problem. They're still connected. Both parties.

HENCE,
R

Well if that's the case, then thumbs-down.

584 konservo  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:04:36am

re: #578 Live4Truth

The Sweden Democrats have their roots in racist movements from the eighties; in last September's general election the party gained 2.93 percent of the national vote, a figure that rose to 22 percent in the southern town of Landskrona.

The party denies being racist, but many are sceptical to these claims. The 2003 party manifesto proclaimed: "The critical ingredient of a safe, harmonic, solid and supportive society is the common identity, which in turn requires a high degree of ethnic and cultural uniformity amongst the people. From this, it follows that the nationalist principle of one state, one nation, is absolutely fundamental."

[Link: www.thelocal.se...]

To me, "a high degree of ethnic and cultural uniformity" smacks of racism.

585 too-old to-???  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:28:23am

After reading these documents, I am left wondering, what is the question being asked?

That someone sent them to Charles is important. It means that they know that his site is against racism, fascism, and antisemitism.

Is it an attempt to change his opinion? Perhaps.

It could also be a cry for help.

Perhaps the person that sent the documents is ready to make a clean break from the Fascist associations of the past, but doesn't have an idea about how such a thing could be done.

Except for the ethnic portion of the documents, I find myself agreeing with most of the rest.

I am an American citizen. My ancestors came from England, Scotland, Ireland, France and Germany. The family history tells me that some parts of my family pre-date Columbus. It doesn't tell me what Nation they were, so perhaps that part is just a family myth. Whatever. I am American.

The sender of these documents can't believe that we would accept them without question.

So that makes me ask, what is the real question? What do they really want to know? What are they seeking, but don't know how to ask?

I'll sit on the fence, waiting for them to prove themselves different from their history.

586 kepiblanc  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:37:50am

Fjordman wasn't the only LGF-reader at the Brussels conference. I was there as well and - as always - wearing my Israel-Denmark solidarity badge. I can sum this discussion about Vlaams Belang and Sverigesdemokraterna being nazis up in one word (courtesy of General Patton) : NUTS.

587 too-old to-???  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:51:00am

re: #586 kepiblanc

That wasn't Gen. Patton, that was Gen. McAuliffe, of the 101st Airborne.

588 shalmanessar  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 2:21:10am

Woot. Finally remembered my password from years ago.

Um. Nazis were bad dudes, but only because they had soldiers to inflict their vision on others. When I see young male immigrants of an islamo-fascist bent and aging swedes of whatever other flavor of fascism, allow me to yawn at the alarmists who say sweeping statements like, "We'll have to fight the other fascists after they win against the Muslims!"

Erm, no. Swedes don't have enough young people to arm up and invade Rhode Island, let alone the other forty-nine. It's a zero-risk proposition.

If Charles Johnson wants to distance himself from what may be neo-nazi for the sake of zealously guarding his reputation, that is cool. But for god's sake, let's tone down the paranoia around here about fighting off two enemies. Swedes would never invade American even if their socialist totalitarian state became a fascist one. It's not a matter of would they. They can't. The Wehrmacht do not invade in walkers and wheelchairs!

589 Render  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 2:24:02am

hmmm...

I'm an American.

My ancestors came from Poland, Germany, Romania, and Russia.

My family tree stretches back just three generations in the US.

None of the European roots survived the war.

NOT
ONE,
R

590 shalmanessar  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 2:32:42am

I love, btw, the fact that I can give a point to my own comments. This ensures that I will always have at least one person in agreement with me. Nice feature. :)

591 sushi  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 2:45:43am

This is not yesterdays war.

But Islam is certainly our oldest enemy.
This war will not be won by a bunch of screen jockey's or with political correctness.

Hitler was not 'far right'- Hitler was a socialist.

592 Suzette  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 2:53:49am

re: #562 lennysquiggy

Charles,

I'm a little confused as to why you're worried about Neo-Nazis who oppose Islamofascism... Opposing Islamofascism is akin to hating cancer, disliking death and wanting to end AIDS. Just because a Nazi opposes some universally awful things doesn't make him a good person.

And most importantly, it doesn't make YOU a bad person because you also oppose those awful things.

Let the Nazis alone and they will expose themselves for who they are. Giving them any attention will only help two groups - the Neo-Nazis and the Leftist Dhimmis who would love nothing more than to mislabel LGF.

Put the light on them! Ignoring them only allows them to grow and hide behind a mask.

593 Suzette  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 3:01:10am

Not to mention I do not understand some of the fence sitters here.
These parties grew from the roots of Nazism and racial purity.
Like kudzu vine...sure you can chop it down, but unless you dig deep and extract the whole root it will grow back.
Although they no longer call themselves and align themselves with neo-nazism....they do with racial and national purity.
This national and racial purity is exactly the roots of which nazism grew from.
This is a no brainer to me.
Never, ever again!

594 kepiblanc  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 3:34:32am

re: #587 too-old to-?

You're right, of course. My bad. And I should have known better, 'cause after the Brussels meeting a few of us drove down to Bastogne in the Ardennes (The Bulge) to pay a little homage .

595 Shalmanessar  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 3:39:36am

So... The Palestinians get the right of return? No nation has a say of what other mass of people may immigrate and change its culture?

My view has always been that each country can decide its own course, for good or ill. If Hitler had not invaded other countries, Nazism would have been okay in the way that Stalin and Mao were okay, and how Kim Jung Il and Robert Mugabe are today: unsavory types, but not enough to forego dialogue.

The problem with Islam? Expansion by force is embedded in its creed. Once again, if all Muslims restricted their ideology to their own shores, it would be no problem. I could care less if Swedes want to keep their country Swedish. A world in which all peoples are one indistinct well-mixed and homogeneous mass sharing one culture is a bleak and featureless one, particularly if it has been imposed by a group-think tyranny.

I do care, however, that Muslims eventually want all countries to observe shariah law. The litmus test is how far the creed wishes to extent its particular brand of insanity. I am increasingly convinced, after witnessing the follies of my beloved Republican party since 2004, that any major movement of humans is tinged with some sort of madness on a greater or lesser level. Only individual thought can be entirely sane. Sadly, that last bit is merely theoretical. ;)

596 flipflop  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 3:59:49am

Take any and all of this with a grain of salt. A year or two back, I was reading a lot of press from the British National Party which made the BNP seem right and reasonable. Then I read their manifesto...*blech*.

597 MattMacD  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:14:31am

All I know is that I believe that not all cultures are equal. I oppose the protection of cultures from criticism simply because they are somebody's culture and they don't want to change. We all, left or right, oppose nazis, and we on the right oppose communism. The reason is because we know those ideas are harmful. And guess what, multiculturalists!... cultures are made up of ideas.
I will never knowingly ally myself with those who think any race is genetically superior to others. It is moronic, it is hateful, it leads to genocide if left unchecked.

598 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:16:22am

re: #596 flipflop

Here is the "Manifesto"
of the Vlaams Belang

Which looks zero like the BNP who IMO
ARE racists.

599 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:21:42am

re: #581 Render

re: #578 Live4Truth

That would be the problem. They're still connected. Both parties.

HENCE,
R


You don't know that Render.
You can assume it, you can hold that opinion, but I am sorry, it is not an established fact. Not even close to being an established fact IMO

600 jdow-antijihad  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:27:37am

re: #85 Jimmah

from : [Link: en.wikipedia.org...]


Basic political ideas

The pillar of Sweden Democrats’ ideological message is manifest from the party's statement of principles, which it published in 2003:

"The critical ingredient of a safe, harmonic, solid and supportive society is the common identity, which in turn requires a high degree of ethnic and cultural uniformity amongst the people. From this, it follows that the nationalist principle, the principle of one state, one nation, is absolutely fundamental to the Sweden Democrats’ political values. The nationalist principle is based on the concept of the nation state, that the territorial boundaries of the state shall coincide with its demographic boundaries. In its ideal form, such a society is therefore ethnically homogenous. Cultural diversity is as necessary to mankind as biological diversity is to nature. The different cultures are mankind’s common heritage and they should be acknowledged and kept apart for the benefit of us all... Countries containing a multiple of relatively strong cultures have tended to develop in such a way that they end up diluting the different ethnicities and totally eradicating their original identities. We the Sweden Democrats believe that the safest way to protect the diversity of cultures, taking into consideration respect for human rights, is to do so as much as possible in the paradigm of the nation state." (Sverigedemokraterna 2003)


I couldn't open the last pdf file but I read the others. My take is that, if these papers are to be believed they might not be Israel/Jew-haters, but as the quote from the official policy declaration above shows they are nevertheless racists; like the BNP and some other European Nationalist far right parties these days they couch it in terms of preserving the purity of each race, rather than the superiority of their race. It's presented as a kind of 'equal opportunity racism' that is as much concerned with the future ability of Kenyans to run long distances as it is about the blue eyes and blond hair of Swedes. They equate nationality with race, and desire homogeneity and view mixed race as inferior. Whether the party publicly desires it or not, given their official statements on race and nationalism, it is perfectly understandable that they attract Nazis. These people stink and we don't need their stink on us.

Jimmah, the United States of America since its inception has never been ethnically homogeneous. That is very much not how we became great and strong. We were relatively culturally homogeneous. We absorbed the good parts of immigrant cultures and abandoned the bad parts, mostly.

These guys with their ethnic homogeneity platform are just basic neo-nazi skin-heads in fancy verbal dress. I for one would feel very uncomfortable around them. I believe Pamela has screwed up this time, rather badly.

{^_^}

601 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:36:28am

re: #12 Shiplord Kirel

Vlaams Belang is an easier call, it is a skinhead gang until proven otherwise.

How can you say that?

If anything, the SD looked more like a skinhead gang at first blush. And I don't think even they are a "skinhead gang" at this point.

You know how much I love and respect you we have known each other for years now...

but back in the day proof was required here when making a statement like that, and for someone like you to make it gives it weight it does not deserve.

I have been researching this 4 days now

I see no proof at all that VB is operating as a "skinhead gang"

and yes I will post all the info
and my thoughts on it at my place eventually but I am still in the ruminating and research phase
I have said it a million times
I will not rush this one.

But I do not see any evidence at this point that VB is a "skinhead gang"

602 shiplord kirel  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:43:23am

re: #529 Charles

The lgfwatch stalkers are gibbering and drooling and gloating over all this, naturally.

Pretty ironic considering that our critics on the left will openly align themselves with literally any kind of scum that shares the same agenda and not give it a second thought: Terrorists, pedophiles, stalinists, conspiracy freaks, and, yes, neo-nazis.
You name it, if it hates Israel and the US military, you'll find it at an anti-war demonstration.

603 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:44:40am

re: #582 Truumax

You call them thugs. When I think of thugs I think of people who beat other people up. I see articles and video of VB receiving beatings; ON 9/11! For standing with America!

Also about the counter jihad conference? I find those who were there such as #586 kepiblanc, atlas & Fjordman as credible references saying the conference was a good yet all this noise around it keeps us from knowing what was accomplished. And the jihadis are emboldened because they see there is nothing going to counter them any time soon.

Why don't you organize a counter jihad conference if this one was illegitimate?

604 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:46:33am

re: #52 Killgore Trout

These people are scum not worthy of consideration.

Is that right, oh king of the moral judging of all earth?

Because everything in Wikipedia is right when it coincides with your views, and wrong and biased and terrible when it does not, right?

Since when do we take WIKI's word for anything around here?
I will never base an opinion on any human being no matter how vile they may be on a fucking Wiki article.

605 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:56:19am

re: #581 Render

You really don't believe the photo shopped images at LGFBlok Watch do you? They get you just like that? With no other research?

606 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 4:59:21am
607 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:01:04am

re: #561 Render


I thought I read somewhere we used the mujahadeen in Bosnia?

608 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:03:55am

#257 Charles

I will never ally myself with fascists or neo-Nazis. Not now, and not ever. If we convince ourselves that this devil's bargain is the only way to win, we will have already lost.


Neither will I.

But neither will I CALL someone those things or pronounce them Fascists or Nazis till I am absolutely certain of it.

I can not establish this as a 2007 fact on the ground yet ...
especially in regard to those individuals who attended the CounterJihad Europa.

609 jdow-antijihad  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:08:57am

re: #366 Fjordman

#268: I don't know that person, but I would be extremely cautious with accepting any claims from that site, a hard-Left/Communist site which is a lot less reliable than Daily Kos or LGF Watch.

Look, bad elements do exist in Sweden, more so than in Denmark due to the repressive political climate. I have discussed how to relate to the SD with Bruce Bawer at least once before. It is difficult to find a single decent party to vote for in that country, and if they are serious about rooting anti-Semites in their party, which I think they are, I think they should get a hearing. I don't see why I cannot even talk to people from a nation that is in the process of being overrun by Jihad while all Western governments, yours included, fund Palestinian terrorist organizations.

[Link: www.brusselsjournal.com...]

The Swedish Social Democratic Party, like many other Labor parties, have decided to cooperate with Muslims and import voters while ignoring the violence caused by these Muslims against the native population.
...

The Social Democrats are now following the line of reasoning put forward by Jens Orback, former Cabinet Minister for the Social Democrats, who said during a radio debate that: “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.” The Swedish Social Democrats narrowly lost the elections last year, and appear to have decided that the way to regain and maintain power is to import Muslim voters, a strategy followed by several of their sister parties.

This is an important injection of fact. Words about ethnic homogeneity raise the hairs on my neck. For that matter absolute cultural homogeneity would be equally as hair raising. So I am wary of the Social Democrats for those words.

Often words mean different things to the writer/speaker and the reader/listener. When the Mohammedans declare Islam is a religion of peace they understand the word in an entirely different context than we do. And they do not care to correct that misimpression. So what we must act on is what they DO not what they say. The same could be said for the Social Democrats.

We have a lot of words for what they say. How do they ACT? Are they working towards an ethnic purity? Are they working towards near perfect cultural purity, or are they working towards a culture of modest cultural purity (all might agree that killing people over having been raped is wrong but not that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior) with ethnic diversity?

Too strong a push, in their actions, towards absolutes of ethnic or cultural purity leave me wishing they'd stay away. If they are accepting of those who are accepting them then I believe we have strong common ground and an ability to live in this modern world together in mutual respect.

{^_^}

610 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:10:43am

Wow, quite a thread here, after I got some sleep.

I see posts in this thread saying that Robert Spencer, Bat Ye'or, Andrew Bostom, and a number of others have essentially joined the neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Well that's a bit of a leap. They would realize that joining a movement that included these groups would be immediately destructive of their careers and good names. It's possible that there was a lack of awareness of the SD's historical positions with regard to Nazi sympathy. Spencer rejects the neo-Nazis, but perhaps he should be asked if he would form a party with people who were a decade ago neo-Nazi but now claim to have changed and want to fight Islamism and support Israel.

There are also reasons for serious concern with Dewinter's / the Vlaams Belang's past, but I have seen no evidence that these individuals affirm Nazism and white supremacism. Is that a Machiavellian con? -- a valid question in my opinion. I would like to see the results of a serious, non-leftist-totalitarian investigation. People such as Paul Belien and Alexandra Colen who have been affiliates with the VB are honorable and have strong ties with US groups like the Weekly Standard, etc., which thoroughly investigate their writers' records. Still, I have posted evidence and looked at Charles' evidence that gives me serious reason to be cautious and to steer far clear of a blanket endorsement of the party, as Diana West has given. There can be no alliances with neo-Nazis, antisemites, or white supremacists (even sophisticated, subtle ones); that must be one of our basic axiological principles. I support good people's fight against radical Islam, but at the first sign of evil ideology (e.g. hatred of other races or Muslims) that tentative support would have to end.

I am also grateful through all of this to be an American. I don't have to join any parties here. Imagine what it is like if you live in Belgium and the only party willing to question open Muslim immigration and multiculturalism policies is a party like the Vlaams Belang, which has evil in its history. I hope for their sake the party is truly reformed and handles the fight against radical Islam in a decent, rational way.

611 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:14:22am

Think President John F. Kennedy; think generations.

612 shiplord kirel  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:16:19am

In the meantime, what are the undisputed crazies on the other side of the jihad fence doing:
Dummie Funnies: Randi Rhodes Suggests That Blackwater Started California Fires

Apparently Randi Rhodes suffered worse head injuries than originally thought when she was ASSAULTED last week by 14 Bloody Marys. Air America is the main Leftwing radio network (which means it is tottering on the verge of collapse) and Randi Rhodes is their primary host. So what does it say about the left when their primary representative on the radio sounds like a flat out Moonbat with her theory that the wildfires in Southern California were started by Blackwater.

Audio and transcript at link----- it isn't satire.

613 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:22:23am

#384 Killgore Trout 10/25/07 8:51:30 pm reply quote report 0


re: #374 Randman

No, that's how I read Jeepro's comment....

If Fjordman gives the Sweden Democrats the thumbs up, that's all I need to know to support them.

Which was regarded with disgust by you and for good reason but I could probably pull 50 to 100 comments from the threads since this happened that read as a version of:

If Charles thinks such and such of so and so then that's all I need!


and no one expressed disgust with that.

bah.

614 sushi  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:27:54am

re: #576 profitsbeard

profitsbeard, I'm glad you posted that.

That's very much how I feel. But there are too many here among us who are spooked by yesterdays news.

The irony is, for the Islamofascists we are and will always be Nazi's, Islamophobes, Xenophobes, racists and Zionists no matter who we go to bed with.

615 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:27:55am

As a matter of fact Kilgore
I have been mocked and dingbatted for taking my time on this and stating I am doing my own research.

Very, VERY anti-anti-idiotarian behavior.

616 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:41:45am

Charles? Is there anyway you could arrange for the people who sent you the docs to have a [possibly temporary] LGF account(s)? So that they could face the questioning of the scaly lizard army? :-)

I would like to know who Tina Hallgren Bengtsson from the expose 1996 photo is and what they have to say about her. And other questions related to how they think.

617 jdow-antijihad  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:42:50am

This is a VERY long and thoughtful discussion about the "Sweden Democrats" party. My take on the whole discussion is that they are a basic single issue party that wants to organize the world along likes of ethnic and cultural homogeneity. I find it troubling to ally myself with them in fighting the Mohammedans. While I won't support them I also will not tear them down. I'll let their distorted ideology do that to them, instead.

The enemy of my enemy is merely the enemy of my enemy. He is not necessarily any friend of mine.

{^_^}

618 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:45:22am

re: #615 BabbaZee

And this takes even more time due to the language barriers and translation issues.

619 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:49:45am

re: #617 jdow-antijihad

My take on the whole discussion is that they are a basic single issue party that wants to organize the world along likes of ethnic and cultural homogeneity.

Good grief! They are opposing another organization that will come much closer to enslaving everyone in the whole world and spread desolation everywhere.

As you go at B, never forget A

620 realwest  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:01:46am

re: #608 BabbaZee Hey Babba! Good to "see" you even at the wee small hours when you were posting.
You said: "But neither will I CALL someone those things or pronounce them Fascists or Nazis till I am absolutely certain of it. "

And ya know, I speed read back through this post, stopping at every one of Charles posts (I am SOO glad his posts are green, lol) and.............
Neither did he. So what's your point?

621 Kevin Shook  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:09:47am

I have been kind of following this controversy and I have not read all of the doucments up above. Two things do come to mind:

1. During the Iranian Revolution, the Left joined with and followed the Isalmists first in overthrowing the Shah and then to their destruction. Who says this can't happen on the right?

2. Dennis Prager has commented numerous times that there is a difference between American and European forms of nationalism. While American nationalism is inclusive, European nationalism is exclusive. If you take away language and race, what does it mean to be Sweedish, French or German for that matter?

622 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:21:45am

re: #618 Roger

Exactly. And due to cultural barriers too.
America is not Europe and our world view is not their world view ...
even the way in which we use certain words
like CONSERVATIVE.... not the same.

623 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:22:31am

re: #621 Kevin Shook

your #2 is vital to hold in the mind while researching this thing.

624 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:25:29am

re: #620 realwest

Has nothing to do with the point of my post
Nowhere did I say he said that

I am not picking a fucking personal fight here.

The simply post goes to explaining why I am not jumping on the YOU ARE NAZIS! bandwagon

625 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:31:08am

re: #621 Kevin Shook

(1) Yes, I concur. As I have said, it's one thing to ally with Stalin to win a world war, e.g., and another to build a movement with, hypothetically speaking, white nationalists. Thus, the deal struck with the evil ideology will have many consequences that doom the movement and indeed include the party in the evil.

(2) I didn't know Prager says this; this is my basic understanding, too. He's a great guy ;-) To answer your question, a political group should be based on principles that are non-racial or non-ethnic in the biological sense: personal liberty, protection from enemies, the rule of law, and many values that don't require something you can't change. Language and cultural commonalities (history, celebrations, traditions, religion, etc.) define people's identity and need not be exclusive; in fact, if these are strong they can make the society more inclusive to outsiders. Immigrants should certainly integrate and learn the language in order for the nation to function. Thus, to say something in principle like "our nation is against all non ethnic Germans, French, Flemish, etc.", or "we are for the white, ethnic Germans, etc." is beyond the pale. "Foreigners are not welcome here" is also wrong.

626 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:44:25am

Pop Quiz:

Who said this?

"These people are scum not worthy of consideration"


A) The Racist BNP
B) The Skinhead Gang VB
C) The Nazi SD
D) The Fair Minded Anti Idiotarian LGF Poster Kilgore Trout


Answer!


Kilgore,

you know me long enough to understand this:
I am not "mad"
This was not a "flame"
or an attack.

Just making the point that things are not always as they seem.

627 ex cathedra  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:55:48am

re: #85 Jimmah

from : [Link: en.wikipedia.org...]


Basic political ideas

The pillar of Sweden Democrats’ ideological message is manifest from the party's statement of principles, which it published in 2003:

"The critical ingredient of a safe, harmonic, solid and supportive society is the common identity, which in turn requires a high degree of ethnic and cultural uniformity amongst the people. From this, it follows that the nationalist principle, the principle of one state, one nation, is absolutely fundamental to the Sweden Democrats’ political values. The nationalist principle is based on the concept of the nation state, that the territorial boundaries of the state shall coincide with its demographic boundaries. In its ideal form, such a society is therefore ethnically homogenous. Cultural diversity is as necessary to mankind as biological diversity is to nature. The different cultures are mankind’s common heritage and they should be acknowledged and kept apart for the benefit of us all... Countries containing a multiple of relatively strong cultures have tended to develop in such a way that they end up diluting the different ethnicities and totally eradicating their original identities. We the Sweden Democrats believe that the safest way to protect the diversity of cultures, taking into consideration respect for human rights, is to do so as much as possible in the paradigm of the nation state." (Sverigedemokraterna 2003)


I couldn't open the last pdf file but I read the others. My take is that, if these papers are to be believed they might not be Israel/Jew-haters, but as the quote from the official policy declaration above shows they are nevertheless racists; like the BNP and some other European Nationalist far right parties these days they couch it in terms of preserving the purity of each race, rather than the superiority of their race. It's presented as a kind of 'equal opportunity racism' that is as much concerned with the future ability of Kenyans to run long distances as it is about the blue eyes and blond hair of Swedes. They equate nationality with race, and desire homogeneity and view mixed race as inferior. Whether the party publicly desires it or not, given their official statements on race and nationalism, it is perfectly understandable that they attract Nazis. These people stink and we don't need their stink on us.

This is probably by now a dead thread, but I'll address this. This is, IMO, a reasonable concern that you raise. My understanding, however, of what is meant by "homogeneity" should not be interpreted in absolutist terms. They are not advocating a 100% immigrant free society, but are against a mass immigration that will lead to a completely intermixed multicultural society that has lost its Swedish identity. Many nations want to preserve their cultural and ethnic specificity, not just Western nations. I disagree that this is an unmitigatedly bad desire and that the only acceptable ideal is to desire a complete inter-mixture of the world's population. I don't cherish this prospect. This would be a boring and uniform world. I like the idea of regional variation. To me, an acceptable form of nationalism is that which allows limited immigration, encourages its immigrants to assimilate, and doesn't have any legal barriers that discriminate against immigrants once they are part of the society.

628 yochanan  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 6:57:43am

In euroland it is clear who my enemies are currently the islmo fascists and there leftist dhimmi allies, but the difficulty is finding out who my friends are.

So in my opinion it is time for the Jews of euroland to get the hell out.

If you are young move to Israel if not i would suggest America, Canada or Oz. I put Canada in the list because a lot of the euro Jews speak french and not English.

629 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:01:50am

re: #628 yochanan

makes sense to me

630 ex cathedra  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:06:42am

When I looked at the list of Sweden Democrats running for seats during the last election, I saw some non-Swedish names. This shows that they do not advocate a 100% ethically pure society.

631 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:10:32am

re: #627 ex cathedra

They are not advocating a 100% immigrant free society, but are against a mass immigration that will lead to a completely intermixed multicultural society that has lost its Swedish identity. Many nations want to preserve their cultural and ethnic specificity, not just Western nations. I disagree that this is an unmitigatedly bad desire and that the only acceptable ideal is to desire a complete inter-mixture of the world's population. I don't cherish this prospect. This would be a boring and uniform world. I like the idea of regional variation.

I appreciate your frankness and openness; this is not meant as a condemnation. But your comment contains the kernal notion of what many of us are concerned about and reject: a conception of national identity based on racial purity, not common values. I agree with Dennis Prager when he says says, 'there are only two important races: the decent and the indecent'. We ought not develop an ideology based on skin color, nose shape, eye color or other biological characteristics.

632 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:15:03am

#631 note: I just recalled that Prager takes that from Viktor Frankl.

633 maddogg  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:15:11am

Babbazee

As I recall, David Duke ran for office in Louisiana as a Republican. Does the fact that he was a Klansman mean that the Republican Party is racist?

Also, Robert Byrd, of the Democratic Party was a Klansman, does that make the Democratic Party a racist party?

You are always going to attract some of the undesirable factions to your party if you agree with any of their positions. Racists don't like non-white, non-whatever people, so they are against immigration. So they rally to any party that takes a stand against the Islamization of Europe, naturally. That does not make the Sweden Party racist without further examination.

So, like you, I will refrain from lynching them.

Lynch: to execute without due process.

634 Sharmuta  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:20:39am

re: #615 BabbaZee

You're assuming the reasons for your dings. Maybe it was the ad hominem and not your statement of "taking your time".

635 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:21:32am

"ALIGNED" was Wrong

Stepping back. Not backpedaling. I want to clarify my position. I was wrong to say Charles was aligned with CAIR. He is in no way aligned with CAIR. In my initial post, my passion and my initial shock lead me to snark. It is the blogoshere after all. The fact that CAIR and ultra leftwing sites are on the same page as LGF on this is merely a confluence of events.

This kerfuffle (!) can not, must not stand in the way of all of Europe. I apologize for using that word. I stand by my position. I believe the European parties we have aligned ourselves with are forthright and true and I am deeply sorry if I offended Charles. He is the quintessential anti-jihadist and does yeoman's work. And it is my fervent wish that he examine all the evidence.

Posted by Pamela Geller on Friday, October 26, 2007 at 10:16 AM in Counter Jihad Brussels 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

636 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:26:24am

re: #634 Sharmuta

Do you ever stop and think why you don't get dings?

637 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:31:14am

#635 BabbaZee

Up-ding from me, but there is a great deal of reason for her and us to remain very cautious, in the least.

638 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:34:39am

re: #637 Yank in the EU

Absolutely.
I am 100% caution on this whole thing.

639 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:35:45am

re: #633 maddogg

Also... I think Duke ran for POTUS as a democrat once too, LOL

640 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:37:33am

re: #637 Yank in the EU

I believe you make a potential Nazi talk on their feet. Eventually like many men in business they'll say one to many paragraphs if they are truly bad news underneath.

641 Sharmuta  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:39:37am

re: #636 Roger

No.

642 kepiblanc  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:41:44am

As I said: I was at the Brussels conference. So were Fjordman and quite a lot of other Scandinavians. I'm as Danish as they come and I vote for the Danish People's Party which is probably the most pro-Israel political party known to mankind. This party has gained substantial influence in Denmark as reliable supporters of our present government. Accordingly the left-wing opposition constantly labels us neo-nazis, semi-fascists, bigots, xeno- and islamophobes. And whatnot. We're getting used to it and immune. Seems to be the rule of the game.
So, since Denmark is way ahead of all other European countries regarding anti-islamism, I told my friends in Sverigesdemokraterna and Vlaams Belang to expect just that - and ignore it. And let me add: I talked with Filip Dewinter, and if he's racist then I'm the Emperor of China.
Before going any further into this discussion, let me recommend a little factual reading from the Brussels Counter-Jihad Conference.

643 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:59:06am

re: #642 kepiblanc

Well, I've made many comments on this (which I think are fair to the VB and favorable to Paul Belien in particular), so I would just note it is very peculiar that Gates of Vienna doesn't deal with something like this, after it was pointed out by me to them.

Haaretz:

Gustave "Staf" de Clercq, the Flemish nationalist leader during the war, openly collaborated with the Nazis. After the deportation of Jews began, he was said to have remarked: "Now we can breathe easier." Nevertheless, many members of your party revere his memory and participate in ceremonies to mark the anniversary of his death.

Filip Dewinter:

He is one of the historic leaders of the party. This is part of the history of the Flemish nationalist movement and it is impossible to deny this. We are the descendants of this movement. Some of the members of the party attend these events because they want to honor the heritage of the Flemish movement...

[Link: www.filipdewinter.be...]

As repeated so many times, things like this are legitimate grounds for taking a step back and proceeding with greater circumspection, rather than issuing these strange denials of anything relating the founders of VB (Dewinter's words) to the Holocaust.

644 BabbaZee  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:07:07am

re: #642 kepiblanc


Thanks for the post. I have read a LOT about this particular point the last 4 days.
Now if one reads your link it is clear why they refused to sign the bill.
I wouldn't have signed it either.
It is harboring a sneaky bomb of thought crimes legislation. Dressing it up in a holocaust costume guaranteed making it look like anyone who didn't sign is a Nazi.
Very clever, and very fucking evil.

645 kepiblanc  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:08:51am

re: #643 Yank in the EU

Yes, caution is OK but not paranoia. And maybe the Baron over at Gates of Vienna is preparing a comment right now. He just returned to the States this morning. And what if he - like so many other good people - doesn't have and LGF-login?

646 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:16:24am

re: #645 kepiblanc

It was Dymphna to whom I posted that information. And I agree and am most definately not paranoid -- particularly over years of first-hand experience in Flanders with points that I can see are partly leftist totalitarian lies and partly the truth that the Blok was once a different party than what the Belang affirms right now.

647 ex cathedra  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:17:58am

re: #631 Yank in the EU

re: #627 ex cathedra


They are not advocating a 100% immigrant free society, but are against a mass immigration that will lead to a completely intermixed multicultural society that has lost its Swedish identity. Many nations want to preserve their cultural and ethnic specificity, not just Western nations. I disagree that this is an unmitigatedly bad desire and that the only acceptable ideal is to desire a complete inter-mixture of the world's population. I don't cherish this prospect. This would be a boring and uniform world. I like the idea of regional variation.

I appreciate your frankness and openness; this is not meant as a condemnation. But your comment contains the kernal notion of what many of us are concerned about and reject: a conception of national identity based on racial purity, not common values. I agree with Dennis Prager when he says says, 'there are only two important races: the decent and the indecent'. We ought not develop an ideology based on skin color, nose shape, eye color or other biological characteristics.

As I am Jewish, I am myself very sensitive to any ideology based on the nose shape. I do not advocate racial purity. No nation in the world is racially pure. People have always migrated to other countries and mixed with indigenous populations. I am myself an immigrant in Sweden and would not support a party that advocates an automatic expulsion of all immigrants. This is an extreme position, and I do not support it.

What I think, however, is that many Americans who are brought up in a melting-pot society cannot accept the idea that many people living in monoethnic states or in multiethnic states consisting of monoethnic regions, such as India and China, find it desirable to live among their own kind. I do not find this desire to be absolutely evil. Neither do I think it is fair to characterize it as racist. If one prefers to live with one's own kind, this does not automatically imply that one deems others unworthy or a lower race. This desire is entirely compatible with a deep interest in and respect of other cultures, a desire to travel and learn about other cultures, etc..

People will always emigrate - either because they marry a foreign national or have fallen in love with another culture or can only find a job in their narrow specialization abroad. But mass immigration occurs usually for economic reasons. I never see immigrants from the United Arab Emirates, and for a good reason: they have a very cushy "cradle-to-grave" welfare system in that society. Why go somewhere else? I knew some Japanese in the 80ies and some Irish in the 90ies who repatriated to their respective countries because of the economic boom back home.

648 kepiblanc  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:25:54am

re: #646 Yank in the EU

Exactly. Like the Danish People's Party long time ago was 'Fremskridstpartiet' , the Vlaams Belang and Sverigesdemokraterna got rid of the fools too.

649 Golem Akbar  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:35:46am

Charles, my opinion (plus $2.00 you can get a Starbucks) is to keep a careful distance. European politics being what it is, it's best not to align with any questional organizations like the Sweden Democrats. If they grow, and manage to steer themselves clear of racism (as only the Europeans seem to be able to do), then well and good. Lets listen to their leaders, and if they speak reason, we can refer to that. I wish them well but I'd be cautious about entering into anything that smacks of an alliance.

650 funkyfantom  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:36:13am

A very brief scan of the Swedish Democrats situation leads me to believe that the party had a formerly bad element, which has since been purged.

Obviously, if they support Israel against the genocidal Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists, that makes them look a hell of a lot less like Nazis than most mainstream European parties who support H and H.

Any other thoughts on this?

651 kepiblanc  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 8:36:14am

re: #647 ex cathedra

You're saying something essential here. Denmark is an example of a very, very homogenous country - a fact that probably allowed such a small nation to survive for so long. And yet we strongly encourage immigration from Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria,Bahamas, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kiribati, Korea, North Korea, Laos, Latvia, Lesotho, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Serbia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philipines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Vatican City, Venezuela, Vietnam, Montenegro, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

See my point?

652 AW  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:03:33am

#647 ex cathedra

What I think, however, is that many Americans who are brought up in a melting-pot society cannot accept the idea that many people living in monoethnic states or in multiethnic states consisting of monoethnic regions, such as India and China, find it desirable to live among their own kind.

Exactly. I never understood how it's even possible for someone born and raised in America who has never actually lived in Europe or Asia to understand what a non-multiethnic, non-multicultural society looks like and why the people there might oppose immigration, intermarriage and multiculturalism for reasons which are not racist and not irrational. It takes a great degree of open-mindedness, education and travel for an American to understand the Old World, and very few do.

Also, I'm surprised that no one has brought up the case of Israel. Here is a country that is defined as homeland of the Jews (an ethnic group from the secular Zionist point of view, a religious group from the religious and non-Zionist point of view) based on the Jews' historical connection with the land and a country with no "separation of church and state." What could me more antithetical to the (contemporary) American view of government? Yet most Americans support Israel as a Jewish state, admitting that what is right for America isn't necessarily right for the Jews in Israel.

In my opinion the same type of understanding should be extended to European countries. Just like Israel, the European states have a right to advance the agenda of specific ethnic groups at the expense of other ethnic groups and to promote their culture at the expense of other foreign cultures, as long as all the citizens of the country are granted equal rights.

653 Charles  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:12:15am

re: #643 Yank in the EU

re: #642 kepiblanc

Well, I've made many comments on this (which I think are fair to the VB and favorable to Paul Belien in particular), so I would just note it is very peculiar that Gates of Vienna doesn't deal with something like this, after it was pointed out by me to them.

Haaretz:

Gustave "Staf" de Clercq, the Flemish nationalist leader during the war, openly collaborated with the Nazis. After the deportation of Jews began, he was said to have remarked: "Now we can breathe easier." Nevertheless, many members of your party revere his memory and participate in ceremonies to mark the anniversary of his death.
Filip Dewinter:
He is one of the historic leaders of the party. This is part of the history of the Flemish nationalist movement and it is impossible to deny this. We are the descendants of this movement. Some of the members of the party attend these events because they want to honor the heritage of the Flemish movement...
[Link: www.filipdewinter.be...]

As repeated so many times, things like this are legitimate grounds for taking a step back and proceeding with greater circumspection, rather than issuing these strange denials of anything relating the founders of VB (Dewinter's words) to the Holocaust.

Good post, and that's just one reason why I cannot simply take the word of current Vlaams Belang members at face value, and why I cannot simply endorse them as allies (unlike some others who have decided to embrace them without reservation).

I'm seeing a lot of denial in the statements of both of these parties, even though the things they're denying are easily checked. That disturbs me.

654 Ringo the Gringo  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:14:39am

After reading all the comments and documents I've come to the conclusion that the Sweden Democrat party is not a racist party, although they are somewhat xenophobic. And that their anti-immigration positions are not based on racial or ethnic supremacism but rather on the legitimate fear that:
A) Some cultures (religious or otherwise) are not compatible with Swedish culture (or Western standards).
And...
B) That too much immigration, too quickly, and with out the encouragement of assimilation will dilute Sweden to the point where Sweden is no longer a nation.

I have also concluded that the Sweden Democrat Party's anti-immigration positions DO attract people who ARE racists and neo-Nazis and this, in turn drives away the average person who may otherwise sympathize with the party's views in general. People without whom the party has no chance of success.

Therefore, with less than 3000 members in a country of nearly ten million, the Sweden Democrat Party will remain an irrelevant force until they forcefully and unequivocally renounce racism as evil and purge all racists and Nazi-types from membership as well as physically remove them from any demonstrations and events. They also need to explain their positions more clearly and reach out to a broader segment of the population - to the average person.

Until then, they will remain nothing more than a small fringe party.

655 Live4Truth  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:22:18am

re: #616 Roger

Charles? Is there anyway you could arrange for the people who sent you the docs to have a [possibly temporary] LGF account(s)? So that they could face the questioning of the scaly lizard army? :-)

I was thinking that too. It's just too difficult to identify where their heads are. Seems that some pointed questions could help to flush it out.

656 toadbelly  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:23:25am

Sweden has in the past struggled with its former Nazi blush and there are obviously elements still functioning in Swedish politics. I don't claim to be an expert in European politics, but fascism in Europe is not as fringe as it is considered here (except by left-wing ideologues who think everyone who disagrees with them is a fascist). Its easy to see how two groups who are passionate about immigration may unintentionally come together.
I see a lot of media smear at work here too.
I understand the caution, but I think until they prove otherwise, or someone else can within reason, its not reckless to acknowledge the group; but stay short of an endorsement.
I think this all plays into the larger discussion of race politics, and changing demographics that are, as others pointed out, inevitable.

657 Charles  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:24:20am

re: #654 Ringo the Gringo

I think the best course for the SD, if they're being honest about their desire to renounce the Nazi roots of the party, would be to make a clean break and start a new organization without any associations with previous leaders or members. In fact, this course seems so obvious to me that it's another reason why I can't simply take them at their word.

658 Roger  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:29:17am

re: #655 Live4Truth

I could see it used wrongly by LGF detractors though. Perhaps if Charles could tweak it so that they would be limited to posting only on threads dedicated for such dialog/debate. It might be a format for other situations too.

659 Live4Truth  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:29:39am

re: #657 Charles

re: #654 Ringo the Gringo

I think the best course for the SD, if they're being honest about their desire to renounce the Nazi roots of the party, would be to make a clean break and start a new organization without any associations with previous leaders or members. In fact, this course seems so obvious to me that it's another reason why I can't simply take them at their word.

Yeah, that does make good sense. I would think that they'd want to shed all connections with that group's reputation.

660 Dead Sea Squirrel  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:42:34am

Whew. Long but important thread.

My opinion, fwiw? Charles, for now, stay away from these guys.

A couple of points.

We need some clarity among ourselves when we use warfare metaphors. We are "at war" with Islamofascism, and LGF posts often make use of combat imagery. That's fine, but it is a metaphor. I'm not aware of any full-scale, literal battles between two armies in Europe or the US. Why does this matter? Because there are two types of warfare involved, and they are not the same, and we are frequently talking past each other as a result. One is actual conflict, the other is the "war" for winning public support, in the hopes of preventing the conflict through positive change via the political process.

In an actual battle, sure, I'll take the side of the guys who might have some anti-semites and racists in their ranks against the guys who obviously and proudly do, if those are the only two choices. Stalin, etc. But in a battle for public support, you do not make alliances with questionable groups, because you'll be tarred not just by your association with them, but also by whomever they in turn are willing to hold hands with.

People are told LGF is a hate site, a racist site, an extreme right-wing site. We say otherwise, but of course we would; words are cheap, and people lie. If someone wants to judge us rather by our deeds, what is there to point to? LGF is not a political party; it has no legislative record to brag of. Beyond this forum, the only LGF deeds, at this point, are alliances with and endorsements of other groups. If there is even a shadow of doubt that our deeds do not match our rhetoric, then an honest but skeptical inquirer can justifiably suspect we are just another batch of liars.

Europe is closer to the brink than we. For many of over there, the battle for public support is futile in the face of government/media left-wing tyranny. Time to gear up for literal battle, an honest-to-God shooting war in the near future. We are not there yet in the US. We are still in the war for public opinion. Two different kinds of wars.

661 Yank in the EU  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:45:16am

re: #647 ex cathedra

I am sure from reading your post that we would closely agree on these issues. My remaining thought on this is that an evil ideology, which is based on things like noses and pigmentation, can develop in very benign ways. I have had conversations with totally nice folks (want nothing to do with Nazis etc.) who are upset with immigration and how their nation is starting to look, and say, "Is it really all that crazy or bad if we want our culture, not our race, to basically stay as it is? To protect our nation from people who don't respect it and want to destroy in great numbers?" The answer is of course "no," but as the line of thinking continues it can if we are not careful devolve into wrong and overlysimplistic ideas and principles for achieving this goal. Sometimes people say, "Let's be honest when you think of a German do you think of a black guy named [something very foreign]? What is wrong with being comfortable with people of your own race?" The identity of the nation, if theorized in a particular way, begins to be about how people look, their race, and things they can't possibly integrate. So, to not get into this with a razor, the matter can become a morally confused question in which ideas come very close to racial and physiological definitions of ethnicity rather than culture, language and values.

662 Ringo the Gringo  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:46:04am

re: #657 Charles

I agree.

Any group or party that organizes to oppose the Islamazation of Europe (or of any individual European country) MUST include members from the groups most threatened my Islamic values: religious Christians, Jews, homosexuals, atheists, artists, woman's rights advocates, Muslim apostates and immigrants who appreciate Western values and wish to assimilate into their new society.....as well as average Europeans who wish to preserve their national identity. Without a broad cross-section they will never achieve any measure of success and will always attract racists and fanatical nationalists.

The best thing that Europeans can do to rescue their nations are:

A) Have more babies.
B) Pull out of the EU completely.
And...
C) Stop seeing nationality as and issue of ethnicity rather than an issue of shared values and traditions. In other-words, put an end to institutionalized mutli-culturalism and institute policies that hold assimilation as a prerequisite of citizenship.

663 Ezekiel2517  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:49:29am

Gee whiz. It's a good thing that no mainstream parties in the US have any covert Nazis in them.

/naive

664 Ezekiel2517  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:56:20am

re: #657 Charles

But Charles, wouldn't the same groups who criticize the SD now [CNN, the BBC, the usual rogues gallery of the MSM leftists] try to tar any new organization with the same brush?

You might as well suggest that they all go home, retire from politics, and let someone else start a new party. The fallacy here is either they are connected to the new party or there is no new party.

Explain to me how they can start a new party that won't be "guilty by association" according to their present critics.

665 Dead Sea Squirrel  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:57:25am

re: #663 Ezekiel2517

Gee whiz. It's a good thing that no mainstream parties in the US have any covert Nazis in them.

/naive

/not naive

What's your point? Can you think of a mainstream US party that would make a covert Nazi happy? I can't. Just Ron Paul, because he's a Nutzi.

666 Ezekiel2517  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 9:59:32am

re: #665 Dead Sea Squirrel

None of them as far as I can reckon. I'm sure they're not 100% happy with Ron Paul, but are supporting him because he is an isolationist and wants to yank any continued support for Israel.

667 Charles  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 10:17:18am

re: #664 Ezekiel2517

re: #657 Charles

But Charles, wouldn't the same groups who criticize the SD now [CNN, the BBC, the usual rogues gallery of the MSM leftists] try to tar any new organization with the same brush?

You might as well suggest that they all go home, retire from politics, and let someone else start a new party. The fallacy here is either they are connected to the new party or there is no new party.

Explain to me how they can start a new party that won't be "guilty by association" according to their present critics.

It isn't hard to tar someone with a brush that has tar all over it.

I guess you missed my point -- that if they want to stop being associated with a Nazi past, they should start a new organization without any associations with previous leaders or members. It's not enough to just say, "it wouldn't work anyway."

668 therewaslight  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 10:20:58am

re: #257 Charles

I will never ally myself with fascists or neo-Nazis. Not now, and not ever. If we convince ourselves that this devil's bargain is the only way to win, we will have already lost.

Agree 100%, and well put.

There will always be a difference between what will happen and what we would like to happen. We should never mistake the one for the other. To support this Swedish group and those like it would be a "devil's bargain."

The European Union is a dangerous, undemocratic institution. It does not support our ideals.

669 Sharmuta  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 11:31:33am

re: #660 Dead Sea Squirrel

words are cheap, and people lie. If someone wants to judge us rather by our deeds, what is there to point to?

This is why words matter, and deeds matter. The blogosphere is filled with words, but there are actions, too. Take LGF for example- Charles' words are backed up in his actions. He deletes offensive posts, and bans inappropriate posters, while backing up his points with links, etc. These are the deeds Charles can make to back up his word. Over the years- he's shown that his word is credible because they are backed up with his actions.

We registered members take action, too. We provide links to what we say, and now with some of the features Charles has added, we can take other actions- we can report posts to him; we can rate the best of LGF up to help it shine; the garbage down so that these comments show, by either being deleted or dinged down, that they do not reflect LGF. We can also take action in our off-line lives- spreading the truth about islam ourselves, or introduce someone new to LGF, we can start our own blogs, or find other ways to get involved in the overall fight.

The blogosphere is not deed-less. Our enemies can and do point to more than our words. And I'd add- being less than mindful of that point is what started this "mess" in the first place.

670 Ezekiel2517  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 11:44:19am

re: #667 Charles

I don't see how it's less of an uphill battle for the present SD party to clean itself up than to build an entirely new party, which even assuming they have no officers or members from Nazi-like associations will still be attacked as xenophobic and racist for wanting to preserve traditional Swedish culture.

The first thing I read after your title post above was the Contraversies paragraph in the Wikipedia article you mentioned, since obviously all of the docs supplied by SD are going to present the prettiest picture possible. Apart from several ties to national socialists, the contraversies listed were mostly attacks by leftists calling them the usual spectrum of names they sling at conservatives.

Trying to play a little bit of Devil's Advocate..couldn't SD be considered respectable if they honestly did jettison the goosesteppers?

671 therewaslight  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:01:20pm

re: #670 Ezekiel2517


Trying to play a little bit of Devil's Advocate..couldn't SD be considered respectable if they honestly did jettison the goosesteppers?

No, you have the wrong attitude. It's up to this party to impress Charles if it wants his vote. They've not convinced him.

There's no need to compromise on the best. If something other than the best happens, which given history is very likely, then that is the story.

672 Dead Sea Squirrel  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:12:13pm

re: #669 Sharmuta

I agree that those are deeds that back the words, but they take too much time and effort to discover if you're just somebody trying to find out if LGF is what it claims to be. Instead, inquirers are going to ask, "Who are their friends? Who do they endorse? Who endorses them?" Not many are going to wade through, literally, hundreds of thousands of posts to see if Charles does indeed banish the bad apples as soon as he spots them. We know he does, but how do you quickly and decisively demonstrate it to the skeptic?

673 Sharmuta  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:43:04pm

re: #672 Dead Sea Squirrel

Who are their friends?

Exactly!

674 Live4Truth  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 12:58:34pm

It sounds to me like our opinion of SD should be that we're still unclear on who they are. Their official documents and press releases sound very good, but their past associations with neo-Nazis, anti-Semites, white supremacists, and other various creepos, and how such people continue to make their way into SD (including positions of leadership) gives us the heebie-geebies, and so we're keeping our distance.

675 Sharmuta  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:06:11pm

re: #672 Dead Sea Squirrel

how do you quickly and decisively demonstrate it to the skeptic?

To tell the truth- I let Charles do the work and point to him. Comments are not for all tastes here, but Charles' work speaks to many. Just because someone comes to LGF and reads does not mean they read us too.

676 marjoriemoon  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 1:25:01pm

What does one say to a party with Nazi ties who embraces Jews? Charles is right to be a skeptic.

Interesting article I found in the cache. "Guess Who's Coming to Seder. Dewinter's Tale" by Sarah Wildman. I ask all Jewish readers particularly to give a look.

[Link: 209.85.165.104...]

Dewinter has decided to embrace Jews and Israel, but why? Or does this extreme right wing only wish to belly up to the Jews, to recruit our numbers in order to fight against Islamic extremism. By standing with us, they hope to garner some degree of respectibility as if to say, "We don't hate Jews anymore so if you vote with us, you're not a Nazi. It's the Muslims we hate now."

This gives me no comfort. Europe's neofacist parties cannot expect to offer us the olive branch when their parties are so entrenched in racism. They aren't interested in befriending Jews. Their only interest is to anti-Muslim immigration. And we'd be fools to fall for it.

The above is summed up in this paragraph:

But Teitelbaum Hirsch is not the only Jewish leader who is concerned by what she sees as Dewinter's championing of Jews as a way to spread hatred against Muslims. "Jewish people have suffered in their blood and flesh where racism can bring you," M.P. Marinower says.... Marinower's father survived Bergen-Belsen but died of a heart attack shortly thereafter. "How could a Jew be in favor of a party condemned for racism? And condemned specifically for ... ostracizing a part of society?" Agrees Teitelbaum Hirsch, "I think we have to act strongly to be the guardians of democracy," she says of both the Jews and the liberal parties, "and never leave any important principle to be defended by the extreme right, because we know their way of caring for it is not sincere."

Claude Marinower is a Jewish member of the Flemish liberal parliament.

677 wahabicorridor  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 5:34:09pm

re: #676 marjoriemoon

I am still doing my own research. I haven't made up my mind. But from your link there is this:

Indeed, Dewinter is a model of respect when it comes to discussing Jews--"Israel is an island of democracy and free speech," he tells me. "We should support them much more than we are doing now"--but a fiery bigot when it comes to Muslims. "If you visit some of our neighborhoods, you would think you are in the casbah of Marrakech, not in a Western European town anymore!" Dewinter practically shouts during my visit. "You can't integrate or assimilate a whole community who sticks together, who has nothing to do with our life, our civilization! At least an important minority of them despises us," Dewinter continues, catching his breath. "And if Turkey becomes a member of the European Union? Well!" he laughs. "Jews," on the other hand, "are a part of European culture."

I see 'fiery' yes - but not bigotry. Not once in this article is 'sharia' mentioned - what Dewinter says about that 'important minority' is true - and so I find the charge of bigotry not only unfounded but scurrilous.

If Ms. Wildman wishes to portray Dewinter as a bigot, she'll have to come up with something else to persuade me.

678 czekmark  Fri, Oct 26, 2007 7:12:15pm

Sweden has in the past struggled with its former Nazi blush and there are obviously elements still functioning in Swedish politics

re: 656 toadbelly

Sweden claimed to be neutral during WWII but they really were collaborators with the Nazis providing them with essential war materials. passage into Norway, etc.

As the biblical saying goes 'by their deeds you shall know them'.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Ravaging the geopolitical sphere.