'Repugnant?' Yes, That's What I Wrote

Thu, Nov 1, 2007 at 8:26:33 am PDT

A comment I made in our overnight thread led to this post at Brussels Journal: Repugnant. Why would I say that about Brussels Journal?

Here are two of the comments posted over there in response:

Convergence of neocon morons at LGF
Submitted by darrinh on Thu, 2007-11-01 14:44.

LGF has always been Zionist and neocon, which didn’t bother me until they started attacking European nationalists. As pointed out, if you are anything less than a rabid Zionist, you’re a nasty racist bigot. Interesting they support Zionism but not European nationalism.........

...

LGF sucks
Submitted by Amsterdamsky on Thu, 2007-11-01 14:16.

“It sounds like they are trying to argue that Europe must unite under Christianity, for that is the only way to prevent the Islamic take-over.

That, and racist parties like the Vlaams Belang.”

I think half these guys on LGF are either volunteers for or on the Israeli payroll. If you are not rabidly zionist you will get sh*t on that site.

Oooh-kay.

UPDATE at 11/1/07 11:20:05 am:

Another thread of comments at Brussels Journal reveals open support for white supremacists: The Rape of Europe | The Brussels Journal.

Although the American WN/paleo-con movement has some respectable people & organisations such as David Duke, Kevin MacDonald, Kevin Strom, Jared Taylor, American Rennaissance, Minutemen, & National Vanguard; overall the American movement has failed to connect with mainstream white America. In Europe by contrast, many groups using various tactics have managed to bring WN issues and ideas to the mainstream political discourse.

In light of our recent discussions, pay special attention to that last sentence. “WN” is their abbreviation for “White Nationalism.”