LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

Fjordman's Dramatic Exit(s)

Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 8:38:19 am PST

The person using the pseudonym “Fjordman,” who made a dramatic exit from LGF after being challenged on his ideas about the ethnic cleansing of Europe, then came back, then made another dramatic exit after being challenged again, has now made another dramatic exit: My Farewell to Little Green Footballs.

In all the words he’s written, please notice the many facts I’ve posted that he does not address. Nothing about the White Power symbols in the Vlaams Belang youth magazine, nothing about the connections between unrepentant Nazi collaborator Leon Degrelle and top Vlaams Belang officials, nothing about the top VB leaders who fought with police in order to lay flowers on the graves of SS soldiers, nothing about the White Power symbol on Filip DeWinter’s bookshelf, nothing about DeWinter’s calls for a “white Europe.” The list of things Fjordman chooses not to talk about goes on and on. His whole essay amounts to yet another diversionary attack, with absolutely no substance.

The one issue he does address is the Vlaams Belang’s association with Holocaust “minimizer” Jean Marie Le Pen and the far-right European coalition Identity, Tradition, Sovereignty:

However, out of all the information published by LGF, a lot of which is nonsense or outdated or both, the one piece of information that I disliked the most was VB’s connection to Jean-Marie Le Pen from the FN in France through the Identity, Tradition, Sovereignty group at the European Parliament. I don’t like Le Pen at all and consider it to be poor judgment by the VB to have even a formal link to that party. They should seriously consider cutting that link in the future. It’s not helpful.

In the context of everything else that’s been posted, most people would see the association with Le Pen as more evidence of a disturbing agenda—but to Fjordman it’s simply “not helpful,” and “poor judgment.”

The connection to Jean Marie Le Pen, by the way, is anything but peripheral; Vlaams Belang leader Filip DeWinter kept a framed photograph of himself with Le Pen on his bookshelf, and said in an interview that Le Pen was a “father figure” to him.

Read Fjordman’s whole screed for yourself, and then take a look through the volumes of factual evidence I’ve posted, and ask why Fjordman, Gates of Vienna, and Brussels Journal are spending so much time blowing smoke and personally attacking me, instead of addressing the facts.

Advertisement

705 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:40:29am
2 Shug  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:40:41am
3 dramatic exits .

He reminds me of Evander Holiefield.

Please, if you make a dramatic exit, stay gone already.

3 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:42:22am

"You won't have Fjordman to kick around anymore."

4 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:42:32am
Nothing about the White Power symbols in the Vlaams Belang youth magazine, nothing about the connections between unrepentant Nazi collaborator Leon Degrelle and top Vlaams Belang officials, nothing about the White Power symbol on Filip DeWinter’s bookshelf, nothing about the photo of DeWinter with Holocaust denier Jean Marie Le Pen (also on DeWinter’s bookshelf), nothing about DeWinter’s calls for a “white Europe.”


Nothing about the current VB leadership marching the lay flowers on SS gaves, etc....
The list goes on and on.

5 Shug  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:43:00am

Fjordman FOADman

fixed

6 MandyManners  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:43:23am

Drama King!

7 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:44:07am

re: #3 Honorary Yooper

"You won't have Fjordman to kick around anymore."

Oh, BTW, that was a quote by Richard M. Fjordman.

8 Mambo Bananapatch  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:45:06am

I've really enjoyed Fjordman's essays. Over the years, he has made a lot of points that needed to be made. I have not followed and do not pretend to understand the discussion regarding VB but I do think it's sad that Fjordman has taken this approach, again, rather than using his formidable writing abilities to answer whatever points he feels need to be answered. So sad.

9 insanity police  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:45:09am

It's often not easy or popular to be right. Keep fighting the good fight Charles.

10 Rednek  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:45:21am

Can't we all just get along?

11 Innismir  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:45:38am

Offtopic already? Yes!

Islamic Polygamy in Sharon, MA

I'm sure my fellow massholes are tripping over themselves to say that this is cultural and isn't a bad thing.

*sigh*

12 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:45:46am

Are we crashing their server? It's still loading for me after almost 3 minutes.

Or am I getting addicted to instantaneous response?

13 The Other Les  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:46:20am

There rarely anything more absurd than a self-appointed superior being.

So what else is new?

14 Ojoe  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:46:42am

'Tis a pity that energy should be wasted in these squabbles.

15 itellu3times  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:46:42am

Hey look, I like a lot of what Fjordman writes, but it is just plain odd that he couldn't stretch his need for allies to encompass LGF. Speciesist intolerance for reptiles, apparently. May he fight the good fight in his own way, with other featherless bipeds.

16 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:46:58am

re: #11 Innismir

If the Mormons can't do it, neither can the muslims.

One law, equally applied.

17 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:47:31am
Frankly, I think it undermines the credibility of this website.” I meant that and I still do. It’s quite significant that Jihad Watch linked to this story whereas LGF refused to do so.

I have been thinking hard...about alot of comments I see there.

18 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:47:41am

re: #10 Rednek

No.

19 BulgarWheat  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:48:20am

All in all, I'm a little disappointed to see how things have begun to splinter in a way that I'm pessemistic can ever be fixed and re-enforced.
This is not a criticism against Charles, or anyone else.
I'm just feeling disappointed.

20 Ojoe  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:48:46am

re: #11 Innismir

Well isalm certainly ain't a religion here, if there is a standing law against its free practice.

21 Poitiers-Lepanto  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:48:51am

I apologize for re-posting here my two posts from the DT:

I have forced myself to read the whole thing and the problem is always the same: he talks about everything EXCEPT the MOUNTAIN of evidence published by Charles about the connections between some persons at the famous meeting and neonazism in Europe. He just doesn't discuss it and he talks in the same way ALL the neofascist sympathizers talked during the cold war: in that time they used the (REAL) commie danger, today they use the (REAL) islamofascist danger, but the point is always the same, they want to spread their violent ideas, their horror "philosophies" and the enemy is just an excuse.
But I notice that he has toned down a lot his use of "WHITE" (this and that and that else), a word that was a trademark of all his columns.
Evidently he is in bad faith and now he tries to play the good boy.

And all his talk about the VB and the other shady forces AS true forces in the fight against the jihadists is just empty talk: the neofascists in Europe are not a "force", they are just a liability, a problem, and I accuse them of being provoking agents, actually helping the enemy.
On the whole, typical neofascist doublespeak.
Garbage.

Many who have not lived many years listening to the same kind of doublespeak will be tricked into believing he is in good faith.
I strongly advise everybody to become familiar with ALL the evidence published by Charles and particularly with the names involved in the "BRING A FLOWER TO AN SS TOMB" shame.
Like with the commies, only a thorough inspection of the neofascists' actions and omissions will reveal the truth behind the wormtonguish words.

22 tfc3rid  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:49:52am

Fjordman provided an interesting view of the situation in Europe that was very helpful for us.

However, it is very odd and disconcerting that everyone who seems to be siding 'against' LGF and Charles, simply seem to be running away from a serious, factual debate...

23 ratherdashing  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:50:45am

re: #8 Mambo Bananapatch

Same here. I've been deliberately skipping over the VB posts. It quickly appeared to take too much time to get up to speed on the issue. It's a bummer that LGF lost Pamela and Fjordman over this.

24 Kirly  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:50:56am
I am deeply disappointed by how Charles Johnson has handled this situation. It was dishonest when he presented the Vlaams Belang in Belgium as refusing to denounce the Holocaust. (How the heck he makes this jump is beyond me! Why doesn't F address how it was dishonest to present the VB as refusing to denounce the Holocaust? -Kirls) The truth is that the European Union is directly responsible for much of the resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe, both by importing Muslims and by appeasing Jihad at home and abroad. The EU hardly cares about live Jews, certainly not about dead ones. The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate and above all for imposing restrictions on free speech for everybody who wants to oppose this project. That’s what the VB objected to in this case.

none of that BS addresses the first sentence in this paragraph. I thought this guy was a writer? sounds like a propagandist to me.

kirls

ps. yes, i'm back. for a while. until the next crisis explodes in my face.

25 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:51:15am

after reading the article at American Thinker linking Ron Paul to the Neo-Nazis [Link: www.americanthinker.com...]
This whole kerfuffle doesn't seem so distant anymore.

26 MJ  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:51:23am

I may not remember correctly, but my recollection is that Fjordman used to post here under a different name. Am I wrong about this?

27 The Other Les  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:51:25am

Gotta do stuff.

Bye!

28 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:52:12am
Fjordman, who made a dramatic exit from LGF after being challenged on his ideas about the ethnic cleansing of Europe, then came back, then made another dramatic exit after being challenged again, has now made another dramatic exit

Like Muhammed Ali's "retirement".

29 Poitiers-Lepanto  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:53:07am

re: #22 tfc3rid

Fjordman provided an interesting view of the situation in Europe that was very helpful for us.

I disagree with that too: his analysis was always oriented in a way to frame the situation as a white-non white fight, which is completely out of order and completely UNREAL.
The problem is how to fight islamofascism, not how to create the FOURTH REICH OF THE SNOWWHITES.

30 Terp Mole  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:53:31am

I haven't had time (or inclination) to step into this family squabble... but it strikes me as an awful lot of 7-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon "reasoning."

I'm reminded of the Leftist memes surrounding Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.

31 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:53:38am

re: #23 ratherdashing

re: #8 Mambo Bananapatch

Same here. I've been deliberately skipping over the VB posts. It quickly appeared to take too much time to get up to speed on the issue. It's a bummer that LGF lost Pamela and Fjordman over this.


So...your blaming Charles?...they have a right to attack him...day after day.

32 tfc3rid  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:54:11am

re: #29 Poitiers-Lepanto

I can see your point on that one...

33 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:55:03am

re: #26 MJ

I don't recall him ever using anything except Fjordman.

34 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:55:59am

Muslim seethe alert in 5,4,3..

Olmert sets new condition on Palestinian talks

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said on Wednesday talks on Palestinian statehood must be predicated on the recognition of Israel as "the state of the Jewish people", a new Israeli condition.

A senior Palestinian negotiator swiftly rejected Olmert's demand and the issue threatened to complicate attempts to draft a joint document that would serve as the foundation for a U.S.-hosted Middle East conference later this month.

First they ask to be recognized as Jewish State, next thing you know, they'll be expecting the Palis to stop trying to kill them. Doesn't Israel know by now thats no way to get peace with the Palis?

/sarc

35 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:56:03am

My take is that some of these people got hoodwinked, but they can't admit to being dupes. So that must mean Charles iswrong, so they attack him. Particularly that he is leftist, soft, feminine. I haven't heard "decadent" used yet but its' probably just a matter of time.
Those nazis, so hard and thrusting...

36 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:56:24am

Please note the real agenda here is the breakup of the EU. These people are hellbent on putting back the clock so that Europe disintegrates into squabbling nation states that provided the totalitarian nightmares of the 20th century. They fondly imagine that this can be achieved while still keeping borders open for trade.
Bat Ye'or seems to be able to swallow these dubious alliances, as can many other Israel supporters while yelling " anti-semite" at other people who argue for different approaches to the Middle East. Trying to take 1000 years of European anti-semitism and dump it on the Muslim world is a project that will never attract support among the middle ground in either Europe or anywhere else.

37 doppelganglander  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:56:52am

I'm really sorry about this whole mess. Fjordman's links were always interesting and I appreciated hearing about things happening in Europe that I wouldn't have known about otherwise.

38 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:56:57am

Not that I give a flip about the Kos Kidz' affirmation, but has anybody waded in there to see what their reaction has been to Charles' principled stand against the Euro counter-jihadis allying themselves with white supremacists?

39 Duke6855  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:56:59am

re: #24 Kirly

I am deeply disappointed by how Charles Johnson has handled this situation. It was dishonest when he presented the Vlaams Belang in Belgium as refusing to denounce the Holocaust. (How the heck he makes this jump is beyond me! Why doesn't F address how it was dishonest to present the VB as refusing to denounce the Holocaust? -Kirls) The truth is that the European Union is directly responsible for much of the resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe, both by importing Muslims and by appeasing Jihad at home and abroad. The EU hardly cares about live Jews, certainly not about dead ones. The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate and above all for imposing restrictions on free speech for everybody who wants to oppose this project. That’s what the VB objected to in this case.

none of that BS addresses the first sentence in this paragraph. I thought this guy was a writer? sounds like a propagandist to me.

kirls

ps. yes, i'm back. for a while. until the next crisis explodes in my face.

Haha I was skimming through his "farewell" and picked up the exact same thing - I make no claims to being a good writer, but I know that when you write a topic sentence in a paragraph, you're supposed to support it instead of changing the subject.

40 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:57:24am

re: #33 Dianna

re: #26 MJ

I don't recall him ever using anything except Fjordman.

I don't either.

41 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:57:49am

re: #30 Terp Mole

Charles addressed that question days ago, but since you've been avoiding the issue, you couldn't know that.

I've read every post, and followed every link, and I've read a lot of what the other side is putting up. I think Charles has been more transparent, and has linked more and better research. It's not really analagous to the left and the Rumsfeld photo except on the surface.

42 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:58:15am
Read it for yourself, and then take a look through the volumes of factual evidence I’ve posted, and ask why Fjordman, Gates of Vienna, and Brussels Journal are spending so much time blowing smoke and personally attacking me, instead of addressing the facts.


My guess is because they are cowards. No reflection on you of course. It's just easier to hurl baseless personal attacks than to admit you're wrong - which is EXACTLY what they'd have to do if they'd open their pride-filled eyes and force themselves to think about the real issues.

liberalism is contagious.

43 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:58:21am

re: #30 Terp Mole

I haven't had time (or inclination) to step into this family squabble... but it strikes me as an awful lot of 7-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon "reasoning."

I'm reminded of the Leftist memes surrounding Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.

Vlaams Belang leader Koen Dillen has a photograph of Adolf Hitler with Leon Degrelle, signed by Degrelle personally. Maybe you think that's a trivial "six degrees of Kevin Bacon" connection -- but I definitely do not.

44 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:58:34am

re: #37 doppelganglander

I'm really sorry about this whole mess. Fjordman's links were always interesting and I appreciated hearing about things happening in Europe that I wouldn't have known about otherwise.

I agree. It's truly sad to see how some have lost their way.

45 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:58:51am

#5 Shug 11/14/07 8:43:00 am reply quote report 0

Fjordman FOADman

fixed

FOLDman re: #5 Shug

46 Edouard  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:59:08am

Wow. If Fjordman had written "A Day in the Life" rather than McCartney and Lennon, that last chord would have been about two weeks long.

47 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:59:24am

Notice that he's toned down his deportation rhetoric near the end of the article. He's learing to hide his true ambitions.

Fjordman's question to Charles.......


The indigenous population of all European nations is white. By extension, this means that if the natives want to preserve their majority, this means a white majority. So, if we say that we would like to limit all immigration, not just Muslim immigration, to ensure that the natives remain the majority in their own lands, is this to be considered racism? If so, does that mean that we have an obligation to commit cultural and demographic suicide because we are white?


He doesn't really want to deport just a few trouble making Muslims. He wants a White Europe. That means Asian, black and Jewish populations must be controlled. His population control has nothing to do with assimilation or ideology. It's based on skin color and genetics.

48 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:59:43am

re: #36 threecoloursblue

Re-read your last three sentences and then explain what the heck you meant. It's unclear to the point of incoherence.

49 g3n3r1c  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:59:46am
50 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:59:57am

re: #35 Peacekeeper

Did you listen to Pamela's interview with Paul? It was unbelievable.

51 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:00:46am

Trying to take 1000 years of European anti-semitism and dump it on the Muslim world is a project that will never attract support among the middle ground in either Europe or anywhere else


Right. Cause there ain't a ladder tall enough to get on top of the anti-semitism pile that teh "muslim world" has already amassed.

/* gotta get my GAZE glasses out so they'll be handy. gonna need em soon.

52 ratherdashing  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:00:48am

re: #31 storagemanager

I just hate to see the infighting. No blame is being laid on anyone. I'm not in a position to do that without reading the entire saga.

53 mad_scientist  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:01:29am

I am totally staying out of this one.....havent been here all that often in the prior months and have no idea as to what the origins of this little brew-ha-ha are.......

*sits on the bench for a breather until next thread*

54 loppyd  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:01:45am
Read it for yourself, and then take a look through the volumes of factual evidence I’ve posted, and ask why Fjordman, Gates of Vienna, and Brussels Journal are spending so much time blowing smoke and personally attacking me, instead of addressing the facts.

Sounds very Clintonesque...

55 Dad O' Blondes  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:02:41am

Off Topic...but interesting.

Government Report: More Military Deaths in Some Years of Peace Than War

More active members of the military died during two years of peacetime in the early 1980s than died during a two-year period of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a government report.

Underscores points made about how effective the US armed forces have become. And of course, each and every death is one too many.

[Link: www.foxnews.com...]

56 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:02:50am

re: #23 ratherdashing
23 ratherdashing 11/14/07 8:50:45 am reply quote report 0

re: #8 Mambo Bananapatch

Same here. I've been deliberately skipping over the VB posts. It quickly appeared to take too much time to get up to speed on the issue. It's a bummer that LGF lost Pamela and Fjordman over this.

More realistically, Fjordman and Pamela lost LGF.

57 opnion  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:02:57am

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

58 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:02:59am

re: #24 Kirly


The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate and above all for imposing restrictions on free speech for everybody who wants to oppose this project.


Yes, he's blaming the Jews for the destruction of European Identity.

59 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:03:01am

re: #47 Killgore Trout

It's the lack of colour blindness that has defined the sides of the debate.

60 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:03:01am

re: #49 g3n3r1c

Baath party holds up the White Flag

"Hey, don't confuse us with facts! We surrender!"

- Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi

61 Dirk Diggler  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:03:44am

Charles doesn't believe it appropriate to associate the the "War On Terror" with Vlaams Blok, the Swedish Democrats, or other neo-fascist European parties.

Charles has backed up his belief with considerable evidence too. Fjordman won't (or more likely can't) refute any of it.

There's really nothing more to discuss and Fjordman needs to stop making a fool of himself.

62 Poitiers-Lepanto  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:03:46am

re: #35 Peacekeeper

My take is that some of these people got hoodwinked, but they can't admit to being dupes. So that must mean Charles iswrong, so they attack him.

Some of them, yes, they look like that.
Some others not, and now , finally, they are out of the closet for the fascists they have always been.

And some others have, in my not so humble opinion, played all this to pull LGF into a GIANT PROVOCATION that could have destroyed all LGF's credibility.

Wink wink : CUI BONO ?

LGF made not credible on the national and international stage would be an advantage for...?

You know the answer !

63 MJ  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:03:58am

" In June 2007 the visiting US President George W. Bush was hailed as a hero by a group of Albanians who also stole his watch. “Sooner rather than later you’ve got to say ‘Enough’s enough — Kosovo is independent,’” Bush told cheering Albanians."


Actually, he's wrong about that. I know it's a minor point, but Bush did not have his watch stolen:

[Link: www.breitbart.com...]

64 BingoBunny  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:04:19am

I haven't made any comments about this Charles.. because I'm not sure yet if the Wests response to Islamoterror will be violent or legalistic, and I don't know if local fighters will be klan lite or nazi when and if violence is the option. But I am sure Europe is in grave danger.

65 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:04:40am

re: #55 Dad O' Blondes

Off Topic...but interesting.

Government Report: More Military Deaths in Some Years of Peace Than War

More active members of the military died during two years of peacetime in the early 1980s than died during a two-year period of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a government report.

Underscores points made about how effective the US armed forces have become. And of course, each and every death is one too many.

[Link: www.foxnews.com...]

The early 80s? REAGAN KILLED OUR TROOPS IN PEACETIME!

/lib spin mode

66 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:04:55am

re: #57 opnion

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

It's not the Celtic Cross, it's Odin's Cross. Big difference.

67 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:04:56am

re: #30 Terp Mole

but it strikes me as an awful lot of 7-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon "reasoning."


Watch the video of the Vlamm Belang leadership marching to lay flowers on the graves of SS soldiers.

68 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:04:58am

re: #57 opnion

Read BabbaZee's blog posts-very informative on this.

69 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:05:41am

re: #50 WriterMom

re: #35 Peacekeeper

Did you listen to Pamela's interview with Paul? It was unbelievable.

Oh Lawdy no/ I gave up on her weeks ago.

70 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:06:19am

re: #57 opnion

Go check "Now is deWinter of our discontent", and follow on. Babbazee's been following the symbology and its history.

Or just check out what the ADL has in its database.

71 Ben Hur  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:06:34am
72 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:06:39am
73 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:03am

re: #58 Killgore Trout

I don't follow the logic in that sentence at all. Can you please give me your take?

74 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:11am

re: #58 Killgore Trout

I think that's going further than the sense of the words allows.

75 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:25am

re: #57 opnion

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation


It's not a Celtic cross, its' Odin's cross. Important detail.

76 chinesearithmetic  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:31am

Europeans are always surprised when Americans are on to them.

77 loppyd  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:33am

re: #57 opnion

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

It's called an Odin's cross.

Use of the Swastika is legally banned in most of Europe hence the contemporary use of the Odin's Cross and the various Teutonic runes by white power terrorists in it's stead.

Linky

78 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:35am

See, I have a real problem, as an American, with the whole idea of a white simon pure country. I understand that my national experience is different that someone from Belgium et al. America has always been a multi-ethnic country (not a multi-cultural one, BIG difference) so I can't continence any call for racial purity. But Europe? Well I can only suggest that the model we have established on this side of the pond, despite the troubles we have had, as one to emulate. As the world develops, there must (in a growing society) be more and more people that don't look like your grandparents. The trick is to integrate them into society. Europe needs to learn how to do that without succumbing to dhimmitude or backlashing into nazism.

79 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:49am

re: #57 opnion

probably the same way the gay groups took the rainbow, and the skinheads took the Confederate Battle Flag. You want it you just take it I guess.....and soon, just because you are using it - the symbol is unfit for use by the original users......which is right i guess....cause now a rainbow sticker on a car means your gay and a "rebel flag" in your truck makes you a racist.

* sigh.....

/longs for simplier times...

80 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:07:51am

re: #57 opnion

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

It's not a true Celtic cross. It's an Odin's cross, or a gunsight cross (which is what I thought it was when I first saw it).

81 Clio  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:08:03am

I rarely post on a subject of which I know little or nothing.

Until quite recently, I thought Vlaams Belang was the name of a person.

(Well, it also took me a while to notice that those Browser Page headlines about "Paris Hilton" did not refer to a hotel.)

So I will just say that for whatever it may be worth, I put my confidence in Charles's good judgment.

82 Yank in the EU  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:08:13am

Recall that Fjordman actually defended the white nationalist ideology as a solution to the Islamization of Europe.

(If the precise references would be sought, search for his comments in the first few threads about the SD and the VB.)

83 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:08:19am

re: #71 Ben Hur

Intel develops the eco-chip, with Israeli help

Goycott!

And it reports everything back to Mossad headquarters!

/starting a rumor on the arab street

84 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:08:49am

re: #36 threecoloursblue

Please note the real agenda here is the breakup of the EU. These people are hellbent on putting back the clock so that Europe disintegrates into squabbling nation states that provided the totalitarian nightmares of the 20th century. They fondly imagine that this can be achieved while still keeping borders open for trade.

I hate to be the one to break it to you, but on this point they are right. The EU is absolutely a totalitarian construct.

85 MJ  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:08:51am

"I also dislike how LGF uses the late Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn to justify their views. As Bruce Bawer has demonstrated in his book While Europe Slept, Fortuyn was virtually executed by the left-wing media and the Eurabian political establishment for being a “racist, Fascist and Nazi.” Dutch MP Geert Wilders, who lives with constant death threats from Muslims, claims that a climate of “hate and aggression” has been created in which someone might think that “illegal means are justified to stop me and my people.” Left-wing columnists dismiss him as “someone outside of the law, as the leader of a Fascist party, that is anti-democratic and similar in some respects to the Nazi’s,” he said. "

He's using Pim Fortuyn and Bruce Bawer to support his point of view re: the VB?

86 Kirly  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:09:18am

you know, i haven't been able to keep up with all this but it's already over for me.

Fjordman - what is wrong with you? they're nazis, you fool!

87 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:09:19am
cause now a rainbow sticker on a car means your gay and a "rebel flag" in your truck makes you a racist

I forgot the /sarc tag, cause neither of these is necessarily true.....

88 Thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:09:23am

Think Steve Martin

"This lamp... it's all I need.....
oh, and this white power symbol, sniff...yeah that's all I need."

89 DanThePainter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:09:24am

Thanks for posting this Charles. I was going to in the next open thread, and was wondering if I'd get grief for doing so.
I understand that the Islamists are a greater threat than the neo-Nazis at this point, and so get the GoV and Fjordman position.
But I fear that this drift of Europe to Nazism will lead to another Reich. So in that way I grok your argument.
Thanks again!

90 Golem Akbar  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:09:47am

I am not worried about a splintering of the anti-Islamofascist groups around the world. It was inevitable that the neo-Nazi/White Power groups would try to ally themselves, but the real pro-democracy, anti-fascist folks would not want their friendship. I say "Way to go , Charles," in calling it right.

I predict someday soon other so-called liberal groups, who are really targets of Islamofascism, will join the pro-democracy movement. It really is a war between western civilization versus fascism. I can't imagine why femminists and gays, just to name two groups, haven't started to loudly denounce Islamofascists, yet.

91 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:10:15am

Charles was right.....I guess Pam would these people fighters of the jihad.................

BUDAPEST(AFP)---A Hungarian far-right group recalling the country’s pro-Nazi regime during World War II, inducted 600 new members Sunday in a military-style ceremony amid protests from the government and Jewish groups.

Members of Magyar Garda, or Hungarian Guard, attended the event in Heroes’ Square in Budapest wearing white shirts and black uniforms emblazoned with red and white stripes, a flag associated since World War II with Hungary’s Nazi-allied Arrow Cross regime

Think about the sign...........

The black-and-white signs, some showing Hungarian Nazi leaders during the war raising their hands in a "Heil Hitler" salute, read: "History repeats itself. You can still turn back."

[Link: www.ejpress.org...]

92 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:11:03am

re: #79 Owl

re: #57 opnion

probably the same way the gay groups took the rainbow, and the skinheads took the Confederate Battle Flag. You want it you just take it I guess.....and soon, just because you are using it - the symbol is unfit for use by the original users......which is right i guess....cause now a rainbow sticker on a car means your gay and a "rebel flag" in your truck makes you a racist.

* sigh.....

/longs for simplier times...

Amen to that, brother. The University of Hawaii changed their team name from the Rainbow Warriors to the Warriors, because of the gay connotation. As far as I know, there's a still a rainbow on Hawaii license plates.

93 konservo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:11:06am

Jeez... Fjordman sure put a lot of effort into this essay, I only wish he had focused on quality instead of quantity. He reminds me of 'Christine' at the "Center for Vigilante Freedom," heavy on the words but light on content.

94 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:11:07am

re: #82 Yank in the EU

Recall that Fjordman actually defended the white nationalist ideology as a solution to the Islamization of Europe.

(If the precise references would be sought, search for his comments in the first few threads about the SD and the VB.)

Yes, and in re-reading his essays, he is pretty consistant about deporting all muslims, regardless of their jihadist leanings.

95 opnion  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:11:11am

re: #66 Ward Cleaver

re: #57 opnion


Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

It's not the Celtic Cross, it's Odin's Cross. Big difference.


If you google Odin's Cross you get an ADL link which describes the Celtic Cross also known as 'Odin's Cross" as a white supremacist symbol first used by the KKK.
So I guess I am still confused as to why the symbol was taken by these people at all.

96 Sponge  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:11:28am

It seems to me that the guy is pretty insignificant and really doesn't warrant a whole thread.

Maybe just a rotating title that expounds upon his douchebaggedness.

97 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:11:48am

re: #57 opnion

The Celtic Cross and Odin's Cross (the White Power Symbol) are completely different. More detail here

98 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:12:26am

Once you sin in pride it takes you on a journey to strange places.

99 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:12:55am

re: #86 Kirly

you know, i haven't been able to keep up with all this but it's already over for me.

Fjordman - what is wrong with you? they're nazis, you fool!

And it's double bad, because the VB and SD numbers are small, and the legitimization they get from the counter-jihadi affiliation can only increase their numbers. Not good.

100 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:13:13am

re: #48 Dianna

I don't like the alliances between the likes of Bat Ye'or and neo-fascists.
During Europes earliest displays of anti-semitism, Jews found refuge in what was then the Ottoman empire. See historian Benny Morris for example. History is now being turned on its head to take account of the surge of islamic anti-semitism.
And as well as all this, Fjordman statement that Europe in co-ordination with the left, "imports muslims " is simply delusional. As well as emigrating to find work, many muslims, espeially from the Mahgreb, came to escape the suffocating and dangerous atmospheres of their own countries. These people are completely ignored by the neo-fascists.

101 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:13:20am

I've never seen a photograph of fjordman but I always pictured him like this.....only without the smile.

I've read most of his essays through the past few years and learned much from him, but his complete lack of any discernible sense of humor and his inability to understand that shared values are what makes a society cohesive, not shared ethnicity, always made me weary of him.

He's a smart guy and I wish him the best....I also hope he gains some wisdom because Europe is going to need wisdom more than anything else in the coming decade.

102 Thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:13:57am

re: #95 opnion

re: #66 Ward Cleaver


re: #57 opnion

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

It's not the Celtic Cross, it's Odin's Cross. Big difference.

If you google Odin's Cross you get an ADL link which describes the Celtic Cross also known as 'Odin's Cross" as a white supremacist symbol first used by the KKK.
So I guess I am still confused as to why the symbol was taken by these people at all.

Read the link to Babba's site above titled "Nazis Rune Everything, it will give you some history and etymology for the adaptation of the runes by white power groups.

103 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:13:57am

Opinion I assume you're here to confuse the issue? Got to Hell.

104 Gordon Marock  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:13:58am

We should work toward building bridges over the Fjords that divide us.


Boy, wasn't that clever.

105 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:14:25am

re: #58 Killgore Trout

re: #24 Kirly



The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate and above all for imposing restrictions on free speech for everybody who wants to oppose this project.

Yes, he's blaming the Jews for the destruction of European Identity.


No, he's not. I'm basing that on the conversations I've had over the years with Europeans while I try to figure out the EU. Supporters of the EU who cite 'nationalism' as the evil of the 20th century ALWAYS cite the Holocaust as an example of what 'nationalism' does.

106 Former Belgian  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:14:34am

re: #43 Charles

re: #30 Terp Mole

I haven't had time (or inclination) to step into this family squabble... but it strikes me as an awful lot of 7-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon "reasoning."

I'm reminded of the Leftist memes surrounding Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.

Vlaams Belang leader Koen Dillen has a photograph of Adolf Hitler with Leon Degrelle, signed by Degrelle personally. Maybe you think that's a trivial "six degrees of Kevin Bacon" connection -- but I definitely do not.

Point of detail: Koen Dillen is a leading VB-er (quite damning enough) but is not the party leader. He is the son of founding party leader Karel Dillen (recently deceased).

107 Edouard  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:14:43am

Fjordman is in denial about the utter lack of popular political viability, in the 21st century, of any alliance that is shot-through with the white-supremacist tumor.

It really is too bad that he of all people is so far into his denial that he will do no more than pay lip service to rooting out and expelling this deplorable white-power malignancy from his movement, in effect adopting and willingly accepting a cancer-ridden organism as his own.

108 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:14:45am

re: #95 opnion

re: #66 Ward Cleaver


re: #57 opnion

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

It's not the Celtic Cross, it's Odin's Cross. Big difference.

If you google Odin's Cross you get an ADL link which describes the Celtic Cross also known as 'Odin's Cross" as a white supremacist symbol first used by the KKK.
So I guess I am still confused as to why the symbol was taken by these people at all.

The ADL needs to correct their Web page. The Celtic Cross is a regular cross with a circle over it, while the Odin's Cross is more like the cross-hairs in a rifle scope.

109 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:15:48am

"The illustrious Pamela". Well I don't need to ask which side he's taken.

110 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:16:19am

re: #89 DanThePainter

Thanks for posting this Charles. I was going to in the next open thread, and was wondering if I'd get grief for doing so.
I understand that the Islamists are a greater threat than the neo-Nazis at this point, and so get the GoV and Fjordman position.
But I fear that this drift of Europe to Nazism will lead to another Reich. So in that way I grok your argument.
Thanks again!

My argument is actually more pragmatic than that, and simpler.

It's a mistake for the anti-jihadist bloggers and writers to make alliances with these kinds of groups, because it will alienate mainstream Americans who want nothing to do with anything that smells of Nazis or White Power. And it hands the real enemies--like CAIR--a huge club to beat people like Robert Spencer with, a club they have already used.

111 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:16:51am

I have only watched this so far and haven't commented, mainly because i have been preoccupied with fire damage.

But there is something here that folks need to recognize - Europe provides little space for middle ground when it comes to racial issues.

Most people around the world incorrectly think that Europeans are more racially tolerant than Americans. Having worked extensively in Europe, I can state flatly that such isn't true.

What you have in Europe are two camps - the vocal multiculturalists and the silent racists. Europe has not gone through the immigration / assimilation waves that the US has. Not the same history. In the US people understand that you can be for immigration controls and not be a racist (Cesar Chavez was against illegal immigration). Europe is far from there - you either embrace an ideology that is "virtuously" anti-nationalist (which pro European integration folks are) and therefore pro immigration and anti racism; or you are pro-nationalist (which inevitably means "white europe" in the current political landscape.

Sarkozy is a new breed - of immigrant heritage who is an assimilationist (De Gaulle is truning in hiis grave) but also for stronger immigration controls. He is called a racist by the left because he does not subscribe to their narrow ideology on racial matters.

Point is if you are vocal in wanting to preserve some fashion of European identity and nationality while wanting immigration reform and wanting to confront the islamist absolutists, you are going to have a hard time establishing a political identity that doesn't rub shoulders with the white nationalists. It will take some time and public focus for that to happen. Perhaps Charle's is providing a small catalyst of sorts.

In this I am not sympathetic to the white nationalists in the least - I just have experience in Western Europe that tells me that the "middle ground" is a space that is hard to occupy because most Europeans are unaware that a middle ground can exist - they have a binary view and the middle ground is just a slippery slope leading one to the other side.

112 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:16:56am
113 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:02am

re: #103 Peacekeeper

Opinion I assume you're here to confuse the issue? Got to Hell.

I don't think he is; the ADL page (I've visited it) is vague and misleading.

114 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:05am

re: #73 WriterMom

His view is that Holocaust guilt has prevented Europeans from protecting their race and cultural identity. In his mind the EU's goal is erase individual Eurpean countries thus destroying their local indigenous cultures and replace it with a less pure pan-European identity.

116 Mr. E. Train  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:16am

I think the greater problem here is that Americans generally see nationalism through the prism of ideas (life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, freedom of speech, independent judiciary... ect) while Europeans see nationalism through the prism of race.

It makes a bit of sense. Every other nation but ours has an ethnic identity. I could travel to China, apply for and receive Chinese citizenship, but I would never really be 'Chinese'.

Since Europe has rejected any sort of greater ideology (to jingoistic and American dontcha know) the only thing they have left to rally around is race.

Very sad really. To lose such allies in this fight over something so stupid. Im the father figure to my 3 nieces, and their biological father was black. Id jump in front of a bus for those girls and Id fight anyone who would declare them lesser people... or those that would associate with those types. The GWOT is a struggle against fascism, misogyny, racism and all the other retrograde ideas the jihadis stand for.

I enjoyed F mans essays but I hope he stays gone this time. In siding with bigots he has sided with those that would spit on my girls. Good by F man, I guess I never really knew ye.

117 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:20am

re: #100 threecoloursblue

I've read Morris; you're not exactly right about the various flows of people or time or context, but that's all right in a couple sentences. Your second paragraph makes a certain amount of sense. It doesn't clarify your meaning in context all that well, but it does help.

Unfortunately, my time for hanging out is over, so I can't continue. The little numbers await me.

118 Shug  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:26am

I just called MGM grand Las vegas Sports Book

Current odds on Fjordman returning to make another dramatic exit are 3:1 in favor

119 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:39am

Unfortunately for Fjordman and a lot of others that are members or friends of these nationalist neo-nazi groups, the pull of the group is stronger than the pull to independently think through the facts and possibly isolate yourself from your friends.

120 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:46am

re: #92 Ward Cleaver


When I was a kid and you saw a rainbow anywhere( on a sticker, notebook, painted on a wall, whatever - it kinda meant " happy" or" peace" or "horray - oh look a pretty rainbow!." God says it was a sign for the world. I just think it's a big slap in the face that they chose that as their symbol. Same for the skinheads.....except I think they chose the battle flag because they thought it represented a struggle for white power. While I'm not totally convinced that the War of Northern Aggression(as we like to call it ;) LOL ) was free of racist intentions, I do believe what I've read that says it was a war for States' Rights against a big Federal Government. I have no doubts or dillusions that there weren't racists fighting for the right to keep their slaves...but I also have no doubt that the skinheads think that was the ONLY reason for the war, thus their adaptation of the Battle Flag. But, that's just me and I've been known to be wrong....so I'm just sayin - it's just what I think from what I can gather. no offense to gay folks meant - much offense to skinheads meant, however.

121 infidelesto  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:48am

I just can't believe this has come to this point. It's sad to see fighting go on between bloggers who seem to have most things in common yet situations like this. I have both Gates of Vienna and LGF on my blogroll at my blog and I read them both regularly, and while I agree with Charles wholeheartedly on the issue, especially with what happened with Atlas, It's just sad to see ally vs ally.

It should be allies vs the Islamist Jihad movement. That's really ultimately why we're here doing this blogging thing in the first place.

Anti-Jihad bloggers should stick together and remember the REAL reason why we blog.

122 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:51am
PRAGUE (AFP-EJP)---Brandishing yellow stars and red flags, more
than a 1,000 people rallied in Prague’s old Jewish quarter Saturday to block an extreme-right march on the anniversary of a notorious Nazi-era pogrom against Jews.

Police sealed off the meeting point of the far-right Movement for Young Nationalist Democrats (MND) and arrested a number of skinheads, some armed with batons, truncheons and home-made molotov cocktails, various sources said.

[Link: www.ejpress.org...]

123 Former Belgian  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:17:57am

re: #99 Ward Cleaver

re: #86 Kirly

you know, i haven't been able to keep up with all this but it's already over for me.

Fjordman - what is wrong with you? they're nazis, you fool!

And it's double bad, because the VB and SD numbers are small, and the legitimization they get from the counter-jihadi affiliation can only increase their numbers. Not good.

The SD [and, [vomit], BNP] numbers are small all right. The VB, unfortunately, is a major party in Flanders and the #1 party in Antwerp.

124 BrianA  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:18:34am

Ben Franklin said: " The sting in any rebuke is the truth."

125 Pawn of the Oppressor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:18:41am

re: #43 Charles

re: #30 Terp Mole


I haven't had time (or inclination) to step into this family squabble... but it strikes me as an awful lot of 7-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon "reasoning."

I'm reminded of the Leftist memes surrounding Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.


Vlaams Belang leader Koen Dillen has a photograph of Adolf Hitler with Leon Degrelle, signed by Degrelle personally. Maybe you think that's a trivial "six degrees of Kevin Bacon" connection -- but I definitely do not.

You have to laugh.

"Well I don't think there's any proof"
"Jesus flipping crepes, HE HAS A PHOTO OF HITLER ON HIS DESK! WHAT DO YOU MEAN THERE'S NO PROOF!"

Aiyiyi...

126 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:19:04am

re: #106 Former Belgian

Point of detail: Koen Dillen is a leading VB-er (quite damning enough) but is not the party leader. He is the son of founding party leader Karel Dillen (recently deceased).

That's true -- I meant only that he was A leader, not THE leader, but I see how it could be unclear. Thanks for clarifying.

127 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:19:13am

re: #115 Ringo the Gringo

Meanwhile in Spain: A 16-year old anti-racism campaigner has been stabbed to death during violent clashes with neo-Nazis in the Spanish capital Madrid.

Wow, it's starting. I hope I'm wrong, but I can see riots and civil wars breaking out all over Europe. It isn't going to be pretty.

128 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:19:24am

re: #104 Gordon Marock

that....was a classic. +1 for you! made me LOL.

129 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:19:26am
130 Piglet-U93  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:19:45am

A, picture, symbol and books on a shelf is an impression. Hearing one talk unrestrained long enough the impression solidifies.

131 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:20:07am

re: #84 wahabicorridor

Nonsense. It's so larded with opt-outs and such that it lumbers along. Everyone is against the Ec until they turn on their taps and crap flows out, whereupon they look toEuropean legislation to force their lazy governments to do something. Thats on top of no wars for 60+ years.

132 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:20:10am

re: #125 Pawn of the Oppressor
"Well I don't think there's any proof"
"Jesus flipping crepes, HE HAS A PHOTO OF HITLER ON HIS DESK! WHAT DO YOU MEAN THERE'S NO PROOF!"

Seconded.

133 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:20:20am

re: #115 Ringo the Gringo

Meanwhile in Spain: A 16-year old anti-racism campaigner has been stabbed to death during violent clashes with neo-Nazis in the Spanish capital Madrid.

And notice how this Spanish right-wing group is not just against Muslim immigrants. They're even against immigrants from South and Central America. All these right-wing groups in Europe are racists to the core, and will twist a legitimate issue into something bad.

134 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:20:21am

re: #105 wahabicorridor

Then we agree. He's a White Nationalist. He's not shy about it. See #47.

135 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:20:34am

re: #110 Charles

re: #89 DanThePainter


Thanks for posting this Charles. I was going to in the next open thread, and was wondering if I'd get grief for doing so.
I understand that the Islamists are a greater threat than the neo-Nazis at this point, and so get the GoV and Fjordman position.
But I fear that this drift of Europe to Nazism will lead to another Reich. So in that way I grok your argument.
Thanks again!

My argument is actually more pragmatic than that, and simpler.

It's a mistake for the anti-jihadist bloggers and writers to make alliances with these kinds of groups, because it will alienate mainstream Americans who want nothing to do with anything that smells of Nazis or White Power. And it hands the real enemies--like CAIR--a huge club to beat people like Robert Spencer with, a club they have already used.

Exactly, Charles. There's nothing to gain, and much to lose. Thanks for taking your stand.

136 world turned upside down  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:20:45am

I, for one, will miss Fjorman.

Charles has much credibility with me. But so does Fjordman.

LGF is accused of being "racist" all the time. I can not help but believe something is being lost in the translation over this sundering.

(It feels like my parents are fighting.)

(I know, don't let the door hit me in the ass on the way out...)

137 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:21:19am
138 slartybartfast  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:21:28am

re: #78 billhedrick

The trick is to integrate them into society. Europe needs to learn how to do that without succumbing to dhimmitude or backlashing into nazism.

Well said.

Meanwhile (OT), Capt. Ed is reporting that Markos Moulitsas has been tapped by Newsweek to write a column.

Markos himself comments that he expects "heads exploding in wingnutlandia today," but also expects the conservative columnist Newsweek will hire to balance his entries to explode a few heads on his side as well....

I'm not certain that I would be a complete analog to Markos in any case. I try to expand minds, not explode heads; a proper balance would have a conservative willing to match Kos' stridency on topics, and hopefully with better arguments.

I don't know what's posted over in kosland since the corporate firewall blocks me with the following message: "The requested URL belongs to the following categories: Politics/Opinion, Personal Pages, Profanity." I must say: I concur.

139 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:21:37am

re: #91 storagemanager

And you don't even want to know about what's happening in former East Germany.

140 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:21:44am
BERLIN (AFP)---Germany’s main Jewish representative body said last Tuesday said it was shocked by a standing ovation that a Catholic group gave to a television presenter who was sacked for praising the Nazis’ approach to families.

Eva Herman was greeted with strong applause when she gave a speech to present her new book about family values to a crowd of about 700 Catholics in Fulda in central Germany at the weekend, just a month after she was sacked by the state-run NDR television

[Link: www.ejpress.org...]

141 astronmr20  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:21:47am

This is most unfortunate.

Fjordmann's blog has some great essays, and he has tracked down some good statistical data that seems to be ignored by most.

WHY did he "stick up" for such people?


These sort of things do the most damage to our "quest" for showing the rest of the world what the truth is.

142 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:22:46am

re: #111 karmic_inquisitor

What you have in Europe are two camps - the vocal multiculturalists and the silent racists.

I can confirm. I had a conversation where I was told that unless I have Native American background, I had no moral authority to comment on 'racist America'. When told some of my ancestors were Shawnee, that a book and a movie have been made about them, I was duly pronounced - wait for it 'intelligent'. The bastard then asked what kind of work I do. He was told I teach international relations at the Kemosabe School for Indian Princesses.

143 MandyManners  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:22:58am

re: #53 mad_scientist

I am totally staying out of this one.....havent been here all that often in the prior months and have no idea as to what the origins of this little brew-ha-ha are.......

*sits on the bench for a breather until next thread*

It's not "little" nor is it going away.

144 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:23:20am

re: #109 marwan's daughter

I'm very disappointed in Mr. Spencer.

145 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:23:39am

re: #118 Shug

I just called MGM grand Las vegas Sports Book

Current odds on Fjordman returning to make another dramatic exit are 3:1 in favor

Put me down for a C-note.

146 Elydo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:24:04am

I've been trying to keep a light handle on this progression for a while, but it's been moving too fast for me recently, to which my excuse is that I've been ill for the past month and unable to do much. But I've failed to see any clear lines able to be drawn, and so I'm deciding to take a step back from the controversy until things become clearer.

I trust Charles' work from past experiences and have respected the tactics he has employed on this subject: presenting evidence, supporting with more evidence and not getting dragged into name-calling and finger-pointing, tactics I have seen more of on the main sites opposite from this issue. But at the same time I must note, as a resident of Scotland, that Charles' avowed interest is the United States. Things are very very bad over here in Britain, and worse in the rest of Europe. As an example, the BNP, an openly white power organisation and one reviled across the board in Britain, gained standing in the recent local elections. Not by much, but the mere fact that some people now see them as a repository for protest votes is very worrying. One of Britain's proudest moments is our stand against Nazism and yet the public is beginning to see all other alternatives as being worse, that IS generally how bad things are.

The other thing I must note is that the allegations of leftist tactics by some in the comment threads here is not unfounded, having been on the receiving end just a few days ago. I'm going to continue posting here as I have been, and ignoring people who respond without providing anything to address, a minority, but it was disappointing to see such behaviour, a disappointment I've also seen in people around me who no longer bother posting here much because of such behaviour.

As such, my stance from here on out is going to be as simple as I can make it. I will not condone, support or ally with Racist, Supremacist or otherwisely prejudicial or stereotyping groups promoting intolerance and exclusion. The enemy of my enemy is not my necessarily my friend. And those two facts hold true no matter who the groups in question, what the surrounding situation and irrespective of the odds. As a fundamental position to hold, I cannot think of a better one to defend my principles from.

147 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:24:15am

re: #121 infidelesto

See #110 for an explanation

148 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:24:19am

re: #137 buzzsawmonkey

Sorry. I really should have said "what became " the Ottoman Empire. I was trying to be brief and just give an example. But I think my point still stands.

149 OliveMe  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:24:20am

Do not ally yourself with white supremacists. Do not spend a second musing "they have a point about X, Y or Z." Walk away.

150 Terp Mole  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:24:34am
re: #30 Terp Mole
I haven't had time (or inclination) to step into this family squabble... but it strikes me as an awful lot of 7-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon "reasoning."

I'm reminded of the Leftist memes surrounding Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein.

Vlaams Belang leader Koen Dillen has a photograph of Adolf Hitler with Leon Degrelle, signed by Degrelle personally. Maybe you think that's a trivial "six degrees of Kevin Bacon" connection -- but I definitely do not.

Sorry I missed that... guess fjordman was twisting his mustache somewhere in the background?

I'm sure there's a picture somewhere of President Bush with Saddam's pistol hanging on his wall somewhere... maybe we'll find zombie in the background. I just don't see it.

btw: I also enjoy Indiana Jones reruns... snakes and Nazis, yikes!

Isn't there a war going on somewhere?

151 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:24:39am
152 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:24:48am

re: #121 infidelesto
#121 infidelesto 11/14/07 9:17:48 am reply quote report 0

I just can't believe this has come to this point. It's sad to see fighting go on between bloggers who seem to have most things in common yet situations like this. I have both Gates of Vienna and LGF on my blogroll at my blog and I read them both regularly, and while I agree with Charles wholeheartedly on the issue, especially with what happened with Atlas, It's just sad to see ally vs ally.

It should be allies vs the Islamist Jihad movement. That's really ultimately why we're here doing this blogging thing in the first place.

Anti-Jihad bloggers should stick together and remember the REAL reason why we blog.


I don' wan' no stinkin' nazis in the tent!

153 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:25:19am

re: #109 marwan's daughter

"The illustrious Pamela". Well I don't need to ask which side he's taken.

I'll wait to actually read it before making a decision. JW and DW are blocked here at work.

154 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:25:25am

re: #121 infidelesto

I just can't believe this has come to this point. It's sad to see fighting go on between bloggers who seem to have most things in common yet situations like this. I have both Gates of Vienna and LGF on my blogroll at my blog and I read them both regularly, and while I agree with Charles wholeheartedly on the issue, especially with what happened with Atlas, It's just sad to see ally vs ally.

It should be allies vs the Islamist Jihad movement. That's really ultimately why we're here doing this blogging thing in the first place.

Anti-Jihad bloggers should stick together and remember the REAL reason why we blog.

I, like Charles, don't see the point in being on the same side with, or linked in any way to a bunch of in-the-closet, racist Nazis....psuedo or not. there is no room in a free world for another Nazi rise to power. We can win this thing without them - we don't have to join up with Nazi facists to beat islamo- facism...we can do it alone - and then we can turn our attention to defeating them and their twisted racist ideology.

155 MJ  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:25:25am

"If the readers of Little Green Footballs have any good suggestions on to how I can roll back the Islamization of the West, I’m all ears. And I’m not being sarcastic, I really want to hear it. ... But if he ( Charles) believes that not cooperating with the Vlaams Belang is more important than preventing Europe from falling to Islam, then, with respect, I think he is missing the bigger picture. And don’t give us the lecture about how there are “other alternatives.” No, there aren’t, so do us all a favor and stop pretending that there are."


This is the heart of the problem for two reasons.

First, Fjordman is conflating support for the VB with support for preventing an Islamized Europe. It's not. The VB is not Europe's last, best hope.

Second, Fjordman doesn't understand that the real battle over Islamic fundamentalism is not in Europe but the Middle East. He resents any shift away from his Eurocentric view.

156 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:25:54am

re: #144 Killgore Trout

re: #109 marwan's daughter

I'm very disappointed in Mr. Spencer.

So am I....I started posting on jihad watch before I found LGF.

157 lysol  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:26:02am

I've actually enjoyed reading Gates of Vienna over the years, but like Charles, I have lost a lost of respect for Fjordman over his support of Vlaams Belang.

Europe has all the problems associated with rampant leftism and wide open immigration policies. And we can all agree that a lot of Muslims have not integrated very well into their new home countries. Charles has exposed many of us to a dark side of some right wing parties gaining steam over there. Without Little Green Footballs, I would have never heard of Vlaams Belang.

Thank you Charles.

158 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:26:02am

re: #112 buzzsawmonkey

What makes the EU necessary?

It's a very long story. It was begun after World War I - not World War II - to link France's and Germany's coal and steel industry so they would become economically interdependent and therefore unable to wage war. That's the way it was sold - there's always been another agenda - the abolition of the nation-state.

159 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:27:07am

Hey Charles, Maybe you need to add a fascist character to the LGF logo of the moonbat and the Islamist at the top of the page.

160 astronmr20  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:27:21am

re: #156 storagemanager

Why dissappointment in Mr. Spencer?

Can I get a synopsis? Can't watch the video.. in the midst of work right now.


Thanks..

161 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:27:32am

Actually in the beginning Charles only pointed out the links and counseled caution. Then the gates of Hades opened and they poured lava out on him. These groups are insinuating themselves into the mainstream, they need people like Charles and Atlas to be their mask. He wouldn't play and so they are fooking angry.

162 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:27:39am

re: #159 Ringo the Gringo

Hey Charles, Maybe you need to add a fascist character to the LGF logo of the moonbat and the Islamist at the top of the page.

Second that!

163 Bubbaman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:27:53am

re: #21 Poitiers-Lepanto

I apologize for re-posting here my two posts from the DT:

I have forced myself to read the whole thing and the problem is always the same: he talks about everything EXCEPT the MOUNTAIN of evidence published by Charles about the connections between some persons at the famous meeting and neonazism in Europe. He just doesn't discuss it and he talks in the same way ALL the neofascist sympathizers talked during the cold war: in that time they used the (REAL) commie danger, today they use the (REAL) islamofascist danger, but the point is always the same, they want to spread their violent ideas, their horror "philosophies" and the enemy is just an excuse.
But I notice that he has toned down a lot his use of "WHITE" (this and that and that else), a word that was a trademark of all his columns.
Evidently he is in bad faith and now he tries to play the good boy.

And all his talk about the VB and the other shady forces AS true forces in the fight against the jihadists is just empty talk: the neofascists in Europe are not a "force", they are just a liability, a problem, and I accuse them of being provoking agents, actually helping the enemy.
On the whole, typical neofascist doublespeak.
Garbage.

Many who have not lived many years listening to the same kind of doublespeak will be tricked into believing he is in good faith.
I strongly advise everybody to become familiar with ALL the evidence published by Charles and particularly with the names involved in the "BRING A FLOWER TO AN SS TOMB" shame.
Like with the commies, only a thorough inspection of the neofascists' actions and omissions will reveal the truth behind the wormtonguish words.

I've remained on the sidelines watching this rancor while assimilating the facts. As you point out, Fjordman et al provides a "political" answer to all of the allegations. He simply chooses to ignore the facts. Fjordman's "goodbye" speech is full of emotional hyperbole - a classic "liberal" ploy.

Charles should be commended for calling into question the shady associations and past dealings of some of these "anti-Jihadists". We need their support as much as we need the ilk of David Duke or Randy Weber. My message to Fjordman and those who have similar allegiances is take a hike.

164 Shug  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:28:12am

re: #151 buzzsawmonkey

re: #118 Shug


I just called MGM grand Las vegas Sports Book

Current odds on Fjordman returning to make another dramatic exit are 3:1 in favor


Given the blocked status of his account, I'd say that's a sucker bet.

good point :)

but

Perhaps like many WWII vets from the losing side who fled to Argentina, he will return with a new screen name like Pablo or salsaman

165 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:28:40am

re: #159 Ringo the Gringo

Hey Charles, Maybe you need to add a fascist character to the LGF logo of the moonbat and the Islamist at the top of the page.

love it! That would be perfect and would send a clear message!

Nazis stay away!

166 Gordon Marock  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:28:42am

This whole debate demonstrates why I am against PC speech codes, even to the extent that "hate speech" and Holocaust denial are criminalized. Eurpoean politics are so steeped in history, code words, and ancient affiliations, I prefer that people be allowed, even encouraged, to speak their mind, even if it is "hate speech". That way it is much easier to decide what these political parties stand for without the necessity of seeking guidance from a European Poli Sci professor. Sheesh.

167 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:28:59am

re: #142 wahabicorridor
142 wahabicorridor 11/14/07 9:22:46 am reply quote report 1

re: #111 karmic_inquisitor

What you have in Europe are two camps - the vocal multiculturalists and the silent racists.

I can confirm. I had a conversation where I was told that unless I have Native American background, I had no moral authority to comment on 'racist America'. When told some of my ancestors were Shawnee, that a book and a movie have been made about them, I was duly pronounced - wait for it 'intelligent'. The bastard then asked what kind of work I do. He was told I teach international relations at the Kemosabe School for Indian Princesses.

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAAA

168 Thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:29:01am

re: #123 Former Belgian

re: #99 Ward Cleaver


re: #86 Kirly

you know, i haven't been able to keep up with all this but it's already over for me.

Fjordman - what is wrong with you? they're nazis, you fool!


And it's double bad, because the VB and SD numbers are small, and the legitimization they get from the counter-jihadi affiliation can only increase their numbers. Not good.

The SD [and, [vomit], BNP] numbers are small all right. The VB, unfortunately, is a major party in Flanders and the #1 party in Antwerp.


Yes, but now that the CD's are taking a harder line, wouldn't you expect their numbers to start falling?

169 opnion  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:29:01am

re: #79 Owl

re: #57 opnion

probably the same way the gay groups took the rainbow, and the skinheads took the Confederate Battle Flag. You want it you just take it I guess.....and soon, just because you are using it - the symbol is unfit for use by the original users......which is right i guess....cause now a rainbow sticker on a car means your gay and a "rebel flag" in your truck makes you a racist.

* sigh.....

/longs for simplier times...


I think that you have nailed it. They just took it because it was there.
These people are not original thinkers

170 Pullus Iulius  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:29:01am

re: #91 storagemanager

Not to belittle the odious Hungarian pro-nazi regime, under Regent Admiral Miklos Horthy, but there is an apocryphal story that I find amusing. It is said that when Hungary declared war on the allies, the Hungarian ambassador paid a call on the US State Department, and the conversation went something like this:
Ambassador: "The Kingdom of Hungary regretfully declares that, from this moment on, it is at war with the United States of America."
State Department Receptionist: "All right, let me get some details. First, who is your King?"
Ambassador: "The Kingdom of Hungary has no King. We have an Admiral."
Receptionist: "You have an Admiral? Then you must have a fleet. Where is it based?"
Ambassador: "The Kingdom of Hungary has no naval base. We are a landlocked country."
Receptionist (confusedly): "Well, let's try this: what is your argument with the United States?"
Ambassador: "The Kingdom of Hungary has no argument with the United States. Our only argument is with Romania."
Receptionist: "Then you are also declaring war on Romania?"
Ambassador" "No. Romania is our ally."

171 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:30:42am

re: #160 astronmr20

re: #156 storagemanager

Why dissappointment in Mr. Spencer?

Can I get a synopsis? Can't watch the video.. in the midst of work right now.


Thanks..


He seems to siding with Atlas Shrugs...but more important...read the commments at LGF....they are over the top....Charles would ban some of those people.

172 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:30:55am

Hey Fjordman!

You can go your own way
Go your own way
You can call it another lonely day
You can go your own way
Go your own way!

BTW, Peacekeeper, is your nickname a reference to the Fleetwood Mac song?

173 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:31:36am

The Torch reviews Christie Blatchford's wonderful book, "Fifteen Days"

Full disclosure: I'm a big fan of Christie Blatchford's writing. So it was with high expectations that I recently picked up Fifteen Days, her newest book. As you might expect from the cover photo, it's about Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan, and their families back home. Or, more accurately, about Christie's impressions of those soldiers and families.

Some might find that personal perspective unwelcome, but I'm not one of them, as regular readers will already know. Here at The Torch, we tell readers up front that we're pro-Canadian Forces, and expect them to read our pieces with that in mind. Blatchford, to her credit, doesn't pretend to be an unbiased observer: she admits her sympathies lie with the average soldier, which is a far more honest option as I see it.

Also: audio file of an interview with Blatchford

And: a video interview with Blatch.

As you can tell, I've long been a fan of Blatchford's work; as a sports writer, a crime reporter, city hall reporter, and now as an imbed in Af'stan. Her style has always been direct, honest, human and she hasn't a PC gene in her body.

174 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:31:41am

Could be

175 Dead Sea Squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:31:49am

re: #109 marwan's daughter

"The illustrious Pamela". Well I don't need to ask which side he's taken.

Check it again: comments at Jihadwatch:

Hmmm. The illustrious Pamela. So I guess I know which side you've taken.

Posted by: wrathofasma at November 14, 2007 12:10 PM
wrathofasma:

No, you don't.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at November 14, 2007 12:15 PM

176 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:32:03am

ooops, link here

177 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:32:07am

re: #112 buzzsawmonkey

A small example which may grate on the sensibilities of an American, but important here in Europe; the death penalty. No country can join the EU unless it discards the death penalty. The reason behind this is that in totalitarian Europe the death penalty was used against political opponents by using trumped-up charges. Remember it was a CRIME to be Jewish, a Crime to be a communist etc etc. America doesn't have Europes glorious heritage.

178 mean Gene  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:32:27am

re: #155 MJ
Good point, MJ.

Here's Denmark today.... [Link: news.bbc.co.uk...]

Denmark's centre-right government of Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen has won a snap election, securing a third consecutive term in office.
His Liberal-Conservative coalition and allies won 90 of the 179 seats in parliament
.....
Mr Rasmussen now faces tough talks on whether to expand the ruling bloc by including a new party led by a Syria-born Palestinian immigrant. ..... New Alliance party, headed by Naser Khader, a Palestinian immigrant. The party won five seats.


Oh, what to do, what to do?
Isn't 90 out of 179 a majority?

179 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:32:43am

re: #155 MJ

"If the readers of Little Green Footballs have any good suggestions on to how I can roll back the Islamization of the West, I’m all ears. And I’m not being sarcastic, I really want to hear it. ... But if he ( Charles) believes that not cooperating with the Vlaams Belang is more important than preventing Europe from falling to Islam, then, with respect, I think he is missing the bigger picture. And don’t give us the lecture about how there are “other alternatives.” No, there aren’t, so do us all a favor and stop pretending that there are."


This is the heart of the problem for two reasons.

First, Fjordman is conflating support for the VB with support for preventing an Islamized Europe. It's not. The VB is not Europe's last, best hope.

Second, Fjordman doesn't understand that the real battle over Islamic fundamentalism is not in Europe but the Middle East. He resents any shift away from his Eurocentric view.


I think we've been watching Europe seal it's own fate for a few years now, if not longer. So I guess now we're supposed to just accept any ole way they choose to deal with the problems that they let happen? whatever.

I can also see it slowly eating away at America. we've got to do more here, and do better in getting the word out that we don't want facist islam or facist Nazism here. ever.

180 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:32:44am

re: #171 storagemanager

re: #160 astronmr20


re: #156 storagemanager

Why dissappointment in Mr. Spencer?

Can I get a synopsis? Can't watch the video.. in the midst of work right now.


Thanks..


He seems to siding with Atlas Shrugs...but more important...read the commments at LGF....they are over the top....Charles would ban some of those people.


PIMF....I meant jihad watch...geessss...

181 packsoldier  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:32:46am

Nazism is immoral and intolerable, and I vigorously applaud Charles's decision to take a strong and unequivocal stand about this. It's akin to William F Buckley's stance against the John Birch wing of the anti-communist movement in the 1950s.

182 Elydo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:32:51am

re: #158 wahabicorridor

And also the desire to create an economic and political powerhouse to rival the superpowers of the rest of the world, of which America is now the sole remainder, though for how much longer that will hold true is unknown, by which I mean the rise of China, the slow restoration of Russia...

I still think it was a terrible idea to put an ex-member of the KGB in charge, he refuses to accept the Cold War might have ended.

183 Thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:33:07am

re: #155 MJ

"If the readers of Little Green Footballs have any good suggestions on to how I can roll back the Islamization of the West, I’m all ears. And I’m not being sarcastic, I really want to hear it. ... But if he ( Charles) believes that not cooperating with the Vlaams Belang is more important than preventing Europe from falling to Islam, then, with respect, I think he is missing the bigger picture. And don’t give us the lecture about how there are “other alternatives.” No, there aren’t, so do us all a favor and stop pretending that there are."


This is the heart of the problem for two reasons.

First, Fjordman is conflating support for the VB with support for preventing an Islamized Europe. It's not. The VB is not Europe's last, best hope.

Second, Fjordman doesn't understand that the real battle over Islamic fundamentalism is not in Europe but the Middle East. He resents any shift away from his Eurocentric view.


That's exactly right, if you note he's alway been virulently against the war in Iraq.

184 Live4Truth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:33:13am

I just read through about 1/2 of Fjordman's post (I don't have time to read through all of it, and I felt I had read enough by that point). What stands out to me is the use of the words "heritage" and "indigenous people," which, as we've come to learn, means "white." It seems that's all that these folks have to defend themselves with, against the Muslim invaders. And that's very sad, as well as racist. What the anti-jihad movement must focus on are values. What values distinguish Western Civilization (and Europe in particular, in this instance)? Values are something that anyone can subscribe to. Draw a hard line on values, and you protect Europe. Europe needs to (re)discover its soul. Being white isn't Europe's heritage. Europe wasn't built on whiteness.

185 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:33:15am

re: #175 Dead Sea Squirrel

re: #109 marwan's daughter

"The illustrious Pamela". Well I don't need to ask which side he's taken.

Check it again: comments at Jihadwatch:

Hmmm. The illustrious Pamela. So I guess I know which side you've taken.

Posted by: wrathofasma at November 14, 2007 12:10 PM
wrathofasma:

No, you don't.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at November 14, 2007 12:15 PM

Yes, wrathofasma is me. Maybe I was too harsh. But he has still remained silent about this.

186 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:33:21am
187 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:33:44am

re: #159 Ringo the Gringo

That's a damn fine idea.

188 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:34:03am

About Robert Spencer, by the way -- he did post early on about this, and disavowed any connections with shady European parties.

189 Oh no...Sand People!  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:34:14am

"He's pining for the fjords!" wakka, wakka, wakka.

190 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:34:16am
191 slartybartfast  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:34:48am

re: #136 world turned upside down

(It feels like my parents are fighting.)

I've been trying to find the words to express my feelings about this unfortunate rift and you've come as close as I could. While "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," I'm similarly reminded of another expression (regarding appeasement): something about feeding the crocodile so that he will eat you last. I suppose it's possible that--taken to the extreme--that's where this European anti-jihad-neo-nazi confluence could lead.

*sigh*

192 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:34:56am

Mainz, Germany - Five suspected neo-Nazis have been charged over a racist attack that put a Sudanese man in hospital and left an Egyptian injured, prosecutors said Wednesday. The group, whose ages range from 17 to 29, has been charged with causing grievous bodily harm to their victims at a summer festival in the west German town of Guntersblum.

The assailants kicked and punched the two men and beat them with a wine bottle, according to witnesses. The Sudanese was admitted to hospital with serious injuries. The Egyptian suffered cuts to his hand.

The attack occurred the same night as a mob chased a group of Indians through the streets of the east German town on Muegeln and tried to kick down the doors of a restaurant where they sought shelter.

[Link: www.earthtimes.org...]

193 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:35:34am

It is a sad day when people who are allegedly intelligent are so blind that they cannot see the forest for the trees.

What is the most baffling to me is why they still, with so much evidence to the contrary, that it should be impossible to ignore, and they certainly have not been able to refute, to continue being too stubborn, and too self-serving to offer a simple apology, and get on with fighting these neo-nazis? I see frightening reminders of the 1930's in what is happening, and those who side with Vlaams Belang et al are fools. That they have the internet to spread their propaganda on?

Scary, as I do not think their followers bother to do what Charles has in presenting irrefutable evidence of the make up and intent of these groups.

A war on the internet between bloggers like Pamela and her ilk is one thing..it is using hollow words...the kind of war those in these groups in Europe and their tools here could start will possibly bring on a real war.

To Pamela and her cult? STFU. Fjordman? We hardly knew you, and Gates of Vienna? Try group therapy with your confused buddies.

194 deseeded  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:36:27am

re: #11 Innismir

Offtopic already? Yes!

Islamic Polygamy in Sharon, MA

I'm sure my fellow massholes are tripping over themselves to say that this is cultural and isn't a bad thing.

*sigh*

Not this Masshole, bro.

195 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:03am

re: #188 Charles

About Robert Spencer, by the way -- he did post early on about this, and disavowed any connections with shady European parties.

Charles...I stopped commenting there after hateful comments about LGF were left to stand.

196 Peacekeeper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:08am

re: #188 Charles

About Robert Spencer, by the way -- he did post early on about this, and disavowed any connections with shady European parties.


Which is no doubt why she turned on the charm to bring him over to her side of the street.

197 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:15am

re: #189 Oh no...Sand People!

"He's pining for the fjords!" wakka, wakka, wakka.

All of Europe is pining for the fjords if there are no centrists speaking out against fundamentalist Islam.

198 RickZ  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:32am

Just goes to show that Europe and America really are different. From the bottom up. Which is why we are who we are. and may we long remain so. The one thing not 'gotten' by our European friends is that we spent blood and treasure to free Europe from Fascism once. Jumping back in bed with them now to face the jihad is puzzling and disturbing to many Americans, especially considering the ideological connections between jihad and fascism. Is the enemy of my enemy really my friend?

199 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:48am

re: #162 marwan's daughter

re: #159 Ringo the Gringo


Hey Charles, Maybe you need to add a fascist character to the LGF logo of the moonbat and the Islamist at the top of the page.

Second that!

The motion has been seconded, can we have a Cox & Forkum cartoon, just one last, out of retirement?

200 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:51am

#167 debutaunt, This is a real problem with the multicultural movement. Frankly it's idiotic. If your family has been in American more than 3 generations, you've probably got claims to at least 3 ethnic groups. I'm German Irish French English Ojibway my self.

201 Pawn of the Oppressor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:53am

re: #111 karmic_inquisitor

I think you nailed it pretty well. I've seen the "quiet racism" with my cousin as far back as fifteen years ago when he was complaining about "the f-cking Turks and Kurds" in my relatives' corner of Hesse. On the other hand, one of his friends was stabbed to death by a "youth" in a country village that probably hasn't seen murder in decades.

(On the flip side again, his circle of friends contains two very assimilated Iranians who speak fluent German. I met them between September 11th and the Iraq war. One of them wished he could come to the U.S.A. and get a pilot's license - he was flying gliders over there - but he knew that wasn't going to happen post-Sep. 11th. I have no idea what they'd say to me now, after years of Iraq and this business with Ahmedinejad.)

I'm confused by the way "white" Europeans don't seem to be able to concieve of ideology and culture as being separate from ethnicity. I supposed that's the confusion you get when you beat somebody in a war, re-arrange their government for them, but then they teach themselves that any flag-waving or overt patriotism is dangerous. I've always had the sense that in Europe and Germany especially, they're a bit lost when it comes to self-identity. Between "I live in this village" and "I'm not American" there's a big gray middle ground with no clear message. As we've seen, a significant portion of incoming Muslims don't have that problem.

Sarkozy seems so non-traditional-European, they don't know how to slander him yet.

202 Former Belgian  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:37:58am

re: #168 Thanos

re: #123 Former Belgian


The SD [and, [vomit], BNP] numbers are small all right. The VB, unfortunately, is a major party in Flanders and the #1 party in Antwerp.


Yes, but now that the CD's are taking a harder line, wouldn't you expect their numbers to start falling?

Probably, yes. It used to be the largest party in Flanders since time immemorial, and as a result became smug, arrogant, and terribly corrupt. (Not to mention that they were basically "for Catholics only" until recently.) A long "opposition cure" may have done them some good.

In addition, this new "Lijst Dedecker" might grab a chunk of the VB electorate, and they've already gotten some VB defectors such as Juergen Verstrepen (one of the "base broadening candidates" they wooed in).

Dedecker, of course, appears to be an antisemitic A-hole --- but there are some good people like the Nova Civitas crowd.

203 bulwrk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:38:12am

re: #174 Peacekeeper

S&W Peacekeeper?

204 Bearster  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:38:36am

I just want to take this opportunity to say "Thank you Charles. I agree with you 100%."

Folks, we are not fighting with bullets for the soil of Belgium. Not yet, and hopefully not ever. In such a case, one might argue that if someone came to the front line, aimed his rifle at the enemy, and started shooting that one should accept him and save questions for later.

But we are fighting an idealogical battle today! In the intellectual realm, what matters is the quality of one's ideas and the quality of people willing to understand and avance those ideas.

The nazis don't help us at all. But they need our help to attain the appearance of legitemacy.

205 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:38:58am
206 slartybartfast  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:39:10am

re: #167 debutaunt

I teach international relations at the Kemosabe School for Indian Princesses.

Heh.

207 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:39:18am

re: #185 marwan's daughter

re: #175 Dead Sea Squirrel


re: #109 marwan's daughter

"The illustrious Pamela". Well I don't need to ask which side he's taken.

Check it again: comments at Jihadwatch:

Hmmm. The illustrious Pamela. So I guess I know which side you've taken.

Posted by: wrathofasma at November 14, 2007 12:10 PM
wrathofasma:

No, you don't.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at November 14, 2007 12:15 PM


Yes, wrathofasma is me. Maybe I was too harsh. But he has still remained silent about this.

Maybe he sees her as a wayward child. You still love them, even if they stray. I still hope she (and Fjordman, and others) will come to their senses.

208 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:39:28am

re: #138 slartybartfast


I don't know what's posted over in kosland since the corporate firewall blocks me with the following message: "The requested URL belongs to the following categories: Politics/Opinion, Personal Pages, Profanity." I must say: I concur.

They got the order wrong, it should be Profanity, Politics/Opinion, Profanity, Personal Pages, Profanity.

209 mean Gene  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:39:38am

re: #192 storagemanager
See, that's going to lead to even more protection for immigrants.
Sort of a 'law of unintended consequences' thing.
Why align with groups whose members undermine fair and legal identification of and dealing with problem immigrants?

210 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:39:39am

re: #182 Elydo

by which I mean the rise of China, the slow restoration of Russia...

It may not be as dire as we assumed.

In a little-noticed mid-summer announcement, the Asian Development Bank presented official survey results indicating China’s economy is smaller and poorer than established estimates say. The announcement cited the first authoritative measure of China’s size using purchasing power parity methods. The results tell us that when the World Bank announces its expected PPP data revisions later this year, China’s economy will turn out to be 40 per cent smaller than previously stated.

This more accurate picture of China clarifies why Beijing concentrates so heavily on domestic priorities such as growth, public investment, pollution control and poverty reduction. The number of people in China living below the World Bank’s dollar-a-day poverty line is 300m – three times larger than currently estimated.

The limits of a smaller, poorer China

211 marwan's daughter[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:39:42am
212 Spiritualized  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:39:53am

re: #183 Thanos

That's exactly right, if you note he's alway been virulently against the war in Iraq.

From what I recall he was only against it in terms of the waste of coalition soldier's lives, and that if Shias and Sunnis want to kill each other then we should just leave them to it.

213 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:40:12am

The war against Islamofascism must become a priority of the political mainstream, if we are to survive. We need to build bridges between conservatives, democrats, liberals & social democrats. Reaching out to racists will only alienate the mainstream.

214 nolocon  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:40:21am

Guilt-By-Association is historically a tricky proposition, sometimes applied inconsistently and incoherently. Here are two examples.

Ronald Reagan visited Bitburg, Germany and laid a wreath of flowers at a German military cemetary containing SS soldiers' graves. The MSM loudly criticized Reagan as being anti-Semitic, fascist, etc.

Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood. She was an outspoken and unrepentent leader of the pre-WWII eugenics movement that was openly racist and had close ties with 1930s Nazi eugenics proponents. Yet, despite PP's statistically disproportionate presence in racial minority neighborhoods, the MSM has never suggested PP as being racist or fascist.

215 Poitiers-Lepanto  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:42:48am

re: #192 storagemanager


Mainz, Germany - Five suspected neo-Nazis have been charged over a racist attack that put a Sudanese man in hospital and left an Egyptian injured, prosecutors said Wednesday. The group, whose ages range from 17 to 29, has been charged with causing grievous bodily harm to their victims at a summer festival in the west German town of Guntersblum. The assailants kicked and punched the two men and beat them with a wine bottle, according to witnesses. The Sudanese was admitted to hospital with serious injuries. The Egyptian suffered cuts to his hand.

The attack occurred the same night as a mob chased a group of Indians through the streets of the east German town on Muegeln and tried to kick down the doors of a restaurant where they sought shelter.

[Link: www.earthtimes.org...]

The heroes of the snowwhite fourth reich: five to two.

Provoking agents helping the islamic invasion, that's all.

And SOBs.

216 MoonbatBane  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:42:50am

re: #36 threecoloursblue

Please note the real agenda here is the breakup of the EU.

And what is wrong with that? The EU is rapidly becoming a totalitarian socialist supergovernment that answers to noone but itself. The end result will either be utter subjugation of the entire continent to an unelected and unaccountable socialist rule or a continent-wide civil war. Can't think of anything worse than either of those!

The problem isn't the fight against the monster that the EU is becoming/has become. The problem is that some are blinded to (or complicit with) the threat of neo-nazism and white supremacism in their fight against the creeping monster of Islamofacism.

217 Ward Cleaver  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:43:15am

re: #214 nolocon

Guilt-By-Association is historically a tricky proposition, sometimes applied inconsistently and incoherently. Here are two examples.

Ronald Reagan visited Bitburg, Germany and laid a wreath of flowers at a German military cemetary containing SS soldiers' graves. The MSM loudly criticized Reagan as being anti-Semitic, fascist, etc.

Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood. She was an outspoken and unrepentent leader of the pre-WWII eugenics movement that was openly racist and had close ties with 1930s Nazi eugenics proponents. Yet, despite PP's statistically disproportionate presence in racial minority neighborhoods, the MSM has never suggested PP as being racist or fascist.

That's easy. Because the MSM hated Reagan, and loves Planned Parenthood.

218 Pawn of the Oppressor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:43:41am

re: #150 Terp Mole

Sorry I missed that... guess fjordman was twisting his mustache somewhere in the background?

I'm sure there's a picture somewhere of President Bush with Saddam's pistol hanging on his wall somewhere... maybe we'll find zombie in the background. I just don't see it.

A time magazine piece (with no photo evidence) from the 2004 election season claiming Bush has Saddam's gun and a picture of people praying? Come on.

It's not even remotely the same thing anyway, if it's true.

219 Yashmak  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:45:00am

I read Gates of Vienna for quite a while, but stopped reading some time back. I found that my dissenting opinions/questions on some topics that I posted in the comments section were regularly met with condescension, or outright insults. I found it virtually impossible to actually engage in a discussion/debate of the issues there. Now, there are of course members here who insult those who disagree too. But there are also those who stand up for the insulted, if they have a rational question/opinion.

So, if we say that we would like to limit all immigration, not just Muslim immigration, to ensure that the natives remain the majority in their own lands, is this to be considered racism? If so, does that mean that we have an obligation to commit cultural and demographic suicide because we are white?

I'm sorry, this sounds EXACTLY like the materials distributed by Stormfront and other white power groups in our own country. I fail to see how anyone could claim differently. Nativism is sheep's clothing for racism.

220 shibumi  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:45:08am

Like many others here, I've only been following this topic superficially.

That being said, it appears that while the leftists/socialists in the U.S. have found ideological common ground with the Islamists, something more sinister is happening in Europe- there, the forces of fascism seem to be raising their heads in an effort to combat Islam.

Personally, I always found Fjordman's essay's/comments interesting; however, the facts in this story speak for themselves. Unfortunately, I expect that this is just the tip of the iceberg, and many others will slide to the side of hatred in order to combat Islam.

221 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:45:39am

re: #179 Owl

Fjordman used the logical falicy known as the "false dichotomy"; the choice is either A or B. You don't like A? Then you are forcing us to accept B. Well, Fjordman is wrong, there are other choices, such as building bridges to mainstream parties. The fact is, by aligning with racists & neo-nazis, they are alienating the mainstream and weakening the ability of Europeans to fight the Islamofascists.

222 BrianA  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:45:41am

re: #213 Kenneth

The war against Islamofascism must become a priority of the political mainstream, if we are to survive. We need to build bridges between conservatives, democrats, liberals & social democrats. Reaching out to racists will only alienate the mainstream.

We have here the left who hopes we loose a war in order to advance their own political power. Don't hold your breath about any bridges being built unless we have another attack worse than 9/11.

223 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:45:42am

re: #186 buzzsawmonkey

No-ones sojurn in a foreign land was sweetness and light in the period I'm talking about. And Jews weren't the only persecuted minority. The Cathars being a case in point..the original "kill them all, God will know his own " people.
Muslims are a minority in the countries under discussion here. Italians are the biggest immigrant group in Belgium. An expanded EC has not stopped but certainly slowed down Muslim immigration into Europe.
Read what the Algerian GIF did to liberal, francofone people. Are you sure you'd hang in there going " why can't we all get along " ?

224 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:46:02am

re: #188 Charles

I don't expect him to shun people over insults and blog wars but he's praising someone who has posted two articles recently about the racial inferiority of blacks and other nonwhites by calling Pamela "Illustrious". She an open supporter of the White Nationalist party Vlaams Belang.
He can't be associated with these people. Could he praise a blogger from Stormfront and get away with it? It taints his entire message and his reputation.

225 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:46:40am

re: #180 storagemanager

re: #171 storagemanager


re: #160 astronmr20

re: #156 storagemanager
Why dissappointment in Mr. Spencer?

Can I get a synopsis? Can't watch the video.. in the midst of work right now.


Thanks..


He seems to siding with Atlas Shrugs...but more important...read the commments at LGF....they are over the top....Charles would ban some of those people.

PIMF....I meant jihad watch...geessss...

I don't think Robert has the ability to ban people, IIRC.

226 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:46:43am

re: #204 Bearster

I just want to take this opportunity to say "Thank you Charles. I agree with you 100%."

Folks, we are not fighting with bullets for the soil of Belgium. Not yet, and hopefully not ever. In such a case, one might argue that if someone came to the front line, aimed his rifle at the enemy, and started shooting that one should accept him and save questions for later.

But we are fighting an idealogical battle today! In the intellectual realm, what matters is the quality of one's ideas and the quality of people willing to understand and avance those ideas.

The nazis don't help us at all. But they need our help to attain the appearance of legitemacy.


In that light( of a real war), I'd just be sure after the firefight was over, that I got the jump on Adolf before he got it on me.
You make very good points and it's posts like yours that make LGF a great place to be. I don't think we've lost anyone ....i think they've outed themselves as something we never imagined they could be.

IMNSHO, Charles and LGF are holding the line for truth and righteous resolve, and the Nazi sympathizers are nuttin' up because the jig is up.

227 MJ  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:47:41am

re: #214 nolocon

Ronald Reagan visited Bitburg, Germany and laid a wreath of flowers at a German military cemetary containing SS soldiers' graves. The MSM loudly criticized Reagan as being anti-Semitic, fascist, etc.

Most of the criticism revolved around the notion that President Reagan was equating the perpetrators of the Holocaust with the victims of the Holocaust. In my opinion, the criticism was entirely justified.

228 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:47:51am

Meanwhile in Germany: Neo-Nazi voices are drowned out...

To the dull beat of a drum, 200 black-clad neo-Nazis and grizzled German war veterans marched through this hilltop Bavarian village yesterday to make their own contribution to Remembrance Sunday.

But in a move that is being hailed as a model of civil disobedience, the whole village revolted. Some locals swaddled themselves in white sheets and pinned life-size photographs of concentration camp victims to their backs. Songs from Yom Kippur – the Jewish Day of Atonement – blared out through megaphones. And as they marched through the medieval gate of the village, the neo-Nazis passed underneath a large improvised banner announcing “Arbeit Macht Frei” (“Work Makes You Free”) – the cynical slogan attached to the entrance of Auschwitz.

The neo-Nazis, holding aloft banners saying “We honour the Fallen of the Wehrmacht”, were confronted by massive pictures of emaciated Jewish prisoners draped over Gräfenberg’s 15th-century façades. A few of the marchers flinched. Most turned their heads away or just smiled.

“I think it is extraordinary what this village is doing,” said Gisela Naomi Blume, chairwoman of the Jewish community in nearby Fuerth. “If Germans had made such a strong showing against Nazis in 1938, history would have turned out differently.”

The nationalist radicals made their way up the valley in driving rain and sleet to lay their wreath on the Michelsberg, a striking war memorial.

Neo-Nazis have targeted the village with monthly marches, making it a de facto shrine for the extreme Right. It may be because an ancient Germanic burial ground is reputed to be near by. Or it may be that the far-right National Party of Germany is trying to win council seats in Bavaria.

The village of 4,000 has responded by privatising the ground near the war memorial.Villagers have drowned out the neo-Nazis’ speeches with loud music, chainsaws and banged pots and pans. The plan yesterday was to stay silent and let the pictures speak for themselves. But as the neo-Nazis shuffled through Market Square, glaring at the villagers glaring at them, a small group started to yell “Nazis Out!”

Which group would fjordman rather have in his foxhole, the neo-Nazis or the villagers shouting "Nazis Out" ?

229 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:47:58am
230 Poitiers-Lepanto  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:48:01am

re: #220 shibumi

others will slide to the side of hatred in order to combat Islam.

side with hatred to fight hatred is not so intelligent.

in other words: don't wear the damned RING !

231 Doug  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:48:29am

As much as we enjoyed Fjordman and turned to him for his insight, the choices are clear in response to global jihadism:

Is it replaced by the American model of "melting-pot" representative republic,

OR

White-Power racial supremacy?

Gotta be a simple answer to that one.

232 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:48:31am

re: #11 Innismir

My parents zt"l are buried in Sharon Memorial Park. I feel like puking.

233 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:48:52am

re: #224 Killgore Trout

re: #188 Charles

I don't expect him to shun people over insults and blog wars but he's praising someone who has posted two articles recently about the racial inferiority of blacks and other nonwhites by calling Pamela "Illustrious". She an open supporter of the White Nationalist party Vlaams Belang.
He can't be associated with these people. Could he praise a blogger from Stormfront and get away with it? It taints his entire message and his reputation.


Well said...And like I said...he leaves hateful comments about LGF unchallenged.

234 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:49:04am

re: #201 Pawn of the Oppressor

I've always had the sense that in Europe and Germany especially, they're a bit lost when it comes to self-identity.

There is considerable self-loathing. In a discussion of why Germany is so hesitant to use military force a German - born after WWII - told me that violence is to Germany what cocaine is to an addict and therefore Germany can never, ever be violent again.

He never realized he had just dumped a bucket of blood libel on himself.

235 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:49:33am
236 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:49:35am

re: #225 Honorary Yooper
Yes he does....I saw it done.

237 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:50:34am

re: #205 buzzsawmonkey

There is no one rational for european unity;trade seemed a bit wimpish for this discussion so I offered another.
And when will you be offering yourself up as a candidate for the " lets break up America - being a superstate is bad" Party.

238 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:50:43am

re: #220 shibumi

The power of the Dark Side is strong......

unfortunately.

239 Land Shark  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:51:51am

The most disappointing thing about this brouhaha is the inability of the folks on the "other side" to address the real and valid points Charles has raised. I can understand how anti-jihadists in Europe might consider overlooking some of these things, after all, the media and government elites in Europe have mastered the art of demonizing anybody to the right of Karl Marx as a "right wing extremist". Seeing the very real threat to their freedoms and their politicians and media demonizing every one trying to defend Europe from the growing Islamization of the continent, I can see why they might be willing to "jump into the trenches" with anyone willing to do so regardless of their baggage. To them Islam is the more inmediate and dangerous threat and I think they have a point there.

But closing their minds and criticizing the messenger without at least acknowledging the truth is troubling. If you are going to fight for true freedom it's important to know who you're getting into the trenches with, and what they stand for. To ignore their white supremacist, Nazi sympathizing actions won't do the cause of freedom any good.

Land Shark

240 Elydo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:51:54am
241 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:52:35am

re: #224 Killgore Trout

praising someone who has posted two articles recently about the racial inferiority of blacks and other nonwhites by calling Pamela "Illustrious".

What?

You're confusing Pamela with Brussels Journal, aren't you?

242 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:52:44am

re: #47 Killgore Trout

Notice that he's toned down his deportation rhetoric near the end of the article. He's learing to hide his true ambitions.

Fjordman's question to Charles.......

The indigenous population of all European nations is white. By extension, this means that if the natives want to preserve their majority, this means a white majority. So, if we say that we would like to limit all immigration, not just Muslim immigration, to ensure that the natives remain the majority in their own lands, is this to be considered racism? If so, does that mean that we have an obligation to commit cultural and demographic suicide because we are white?
He doesn't really want to deport just a few trouble making Muslims. He wants a White Europe. That means Asian, black and Jewish populations must be controlled. His population control has nothing to do with assimilation or ideology. It's based on skin color and genetics.

I take it you get the feeling, as I do, that Lebanese, Palestinian or Assyrian Christians are equally unwelcome in his "white Europe" view? What about the Egyptian Copts, the most persecuted Christians on the planet, are they as bad as the Jihadis?

243 rockin'Ron  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:52:48am

re: #229 buzzsawmonkey

Me thinks the smoke from the bottomless pit is very strong.

244 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:53:15am

re: #228 Ringo the Gringo

Hell yeah. Power to the correct people indeed.

245 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:55:22am
246 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:56:34am

I think Charles nailed it in the podcast posted a day or two ago. White-Power and Nazi are taken very seriously in the US. Europe didn't have the KKK or the intense racial struggles we have.

I was also a big disturbed by Fjordman's post . While I agree that the are jihadiwhackos trying to conquer us thru colonization. I don't think that American's see this has a "white" thing.

We aren't as concerned about color as we are concerned about individuals who don't have our values. I think we would be perfectly happy to be integrated with creatures that are whose skin had blue polka dots and feathers for hair if those creatures did not intend to hijack our constitution.

247 NoSubmission  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:56:50am

re: #228 Ringo the Gringo

Interesting times we live in. The handful of the comments at the end of your article link are very very telling...

248 Terp Mole  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:57:16am
re: #218 Pawn of the Oppressor
A time magazine piece (with no photo evidence) from the 2004 election season claiming Bush has Saddam's gun and a picture of people praying? Come on.

It's not even remotely the same thing anyway, if it's true.

It's called illustrating absurdity by being absurd.

You know, Lincoln actually had a plan to ship America's blacks to Liberia... guess those pennies make us all racists?

Did you know Washington and Jefferson were.... a slave owners! Founding fathers indeed!

/etc., ad absurdum, ad nauseum

249 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:57:31am

re: #241 Dianna

She linked to both those articles, quoted them and said "read it all". They also appeared at Gates of Vienna. Even without the blog wars and insults she still would be dragged through the mud for posting articles on her blog about the genetic inferiority of non-whites. You just can't do that in today's world and get away with it.

250 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:57:57am
251 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:58:28am

200 billhedrick 11/14/07 9:37:51 am reply quote report 0

#167 debutaunt, This is a real problem with the multicultural movement. Frankly it's idiotic. If your family has been in American more than 3 generations, you've probably got claims to at least 3 ethnic groups. I'm German Irish French English Ojibway my self.


Absolutely idiotic. I've always been fond of the idea of being in the melting pot here. I'm also an individual and don't need to hang on desperately to the Indian or European history in my family. Hitler guessed wrong about America, because out strength came from all those who came here and melted so nicely. re: #200 billhedrick

252 JHW  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:58:39am

Since people are asking about the symbolism, especially of the Odin`s Cross among others, I`m going to repost this link by the Interior Ministry the German state of North Rhine Westphalia. The publication "Musik-Mode-Markenzeichen", 4th item down, is a 168 pg PDF document, very heavily illustrated , of the various trappings of the Neo- or Crypto-Nazi movement in Europe, not just Germany. Very profitable to download and recognize all the signs used in this movement, many which have been linked to VB here at LGF. Even if you don`t read German , the wealth of illustrations should be educational. Many of these symbols , including some forms of the Odin`s cross are illegal in Germany (strafbar, also can mean punishable).

Neo-Nazi Signs, Music, Dress

253 Piglet-U93  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:59:17am

re: #153 Ward Cleaver

re: #109 marwan's daughter

"The illustrious Pamela". Well I don't need to ask which side he's taken.

I'll wait to actually read it before making a decision. JW and DW are blocked here at work.

If an Anti-Jihad site is blocked check out 1389.

254 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:59:28am

re: #240 Elydo


I know it's not supposed to be funny, but.........................

255 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:00:27am

re: #242 Spiny Norman

Somebody posted a great article recently about Ayaan Hrirsi Ali leaving Europe not so much from the fear of Jihadis but also because the European Nationalists (White Nationalists) who were supposed to be on her side were offering her increasingly weak support.

256 lurking faith  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:00:36am

re: #107 Edouard

Fjordman is in denial about the utter lack of popular political viability, in the 21st century, of any alliance that is shot-through with the white-supremacist tumor.

I have to disagree with you there. Fjordman is concerned with Europe, and in Europe there is a vast undercurrent of quiet racism.

As for American sensibilities, which can utterly reject race-based nationalism without being leftist in the slightest, I get the impression that Fman is not in denial, but in deep ignorance.

As Ringo the Gringo said earlier, Fman appears to lack humor. I would add that Fman also lacks imagination and humility. To be specific, that kind of imagination which allows a person to see another person's viewpoint, and that kind of humility that admits an outsider may recognize something in you that you never noticed about yourself.

257 cagney  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:00:42am

There are genuine fears about immigration in Europe and the UK (incidentally the biggest number of immigrants to the UK in the past year or two have been white Poles).

Immigration and anti-jihadism overlaps at some points as can be seen by the number of Islamic radicals in the UK who are asylum seekers, but on the whole they are two completely separate issues.

It's interesting that the people who say that these two issues are interconnected then go on to talk about white-only or indigenous populations. There is no mention of the non-white populations who are also affected by radical Islam.

They are either caught 'in the net' of the white nationalist ideology or they have a hidden agenda. For this reason, I support Charles effort to raise awareness about it.

258 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:01:10am
259 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:01:11am

re: #235 buzzsawmonkey

re: #223 threecoloursblue

You can try and recast your post into a coherent set of statements leading to a point anytime you feel like it.


it won't reply. if it does, it'll be a first. that's his M.O. Say something stupid, then ignore anyone that asks for facts to back it up or an explaination. I'm still waiting on the answer to " what do fanatical facist muslim clerics think a " good muslim" should be?"

i'm not holding my breath though, brother. not holding my breath.

260 Piglet-U93  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:01:29am

Islam is NOT a race. It cannot be said enough. Islam an ideology.

261 cosmo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:01:44am

re: #11 Innismir

Read carefully. You know that the real reason that this is a problem in Massachusetts is that this man married multiple women. Now, had he married another man...

262 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:02:06am
Hmmm. The illustrious Pamela. So I guess I know which side you've taken.

Posted by: wrathofasma at November 14, 2007 12:10 PM
wrathofasma:

No, you don't.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch

It is 1938....just three words...and still...standing with Atlas.

263 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:02:15am
264 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:02:46am

re: #239 Land Shark

The most disappointing thing about this brouhaha is the inability of the folks on the "other side" to address the real and valid points Charles has raised. I can understand how anti-jihadists in Europe might consider overlooking some of these things, after all, the media and government elites in Europe have mastered the art of demonizing anybody to the right of Karl Marx as a "right wing extremist". Seeing the very real threat to their freedoms and their politicians and media demonizing every one trying to defend Europe from the growing Islamization of the continent, I can see why they might be willing to "jump into the trenches" with anyone willing to do so regardless of their baggage. To them Islam is the more inmediate and dangerous threat and I think they have a point there.

But closing their minds and criticizing the messenger without at least acknowledging the truth is troubling. If you are going to fight for true freedom it's important to know who you're getting into the trenches with, and what they stand for. To ignore their white supremacist, Nazi sympathizing actions won't do the cause of freedom any good.

Land Shark


It's a play from the liberal handbook. It's not that there is an "inability" to address it, per say - but there's a general refusal to address it. . . .

I, for one, don't think leftists are stupid...I think they know exactly what they are doing - they know they're wrong, but they don't care. They want it like they want it and the truth be damned. So it goes with this mess.....

265 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:03:53am

re: #260 Piglet-U93

That's exactly why White Nationailsts have no place in the counterJihad movement. Their agenda is completely different.

266 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:04:33am

re: #222 BrianA

OK, and my point is joining ranks with neo-nazis, holocaust deniers & racists will destroy any mainstream effort and bring Europe all the closer to her demise. Don't hold your breath, get busy building a coalition that will work.

267 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:04:42am

re: #237 threecoloursblue

re: #205 buzzsawmonkey

There is no one rational for european unity;trade seemed a bit wimpish for this discussion so I offered another.
And when will you be offering yourself up as a candidate for the " lets break up America - being a superstate is bad" Party.


listen, I suggest you read the EU Constitution. It's long, but worthwhile. Brussels can basically declare 'compentency' over Member States and there's not a whole lot that can be done about it.

268 Owl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:05:07am

re: #259 Owl

re: #235 buzzsawmonkey


re: #223 threecoloursblue

You can try and recast your post into a coherent set of statements leading to a point anytime you feel like it.


it won't reply. if it does, it'll be a first. that's his M.O. Say something stupid, then ignore anyone that asks for facts to back it up or an explaination. I'm still waiting on the answer to " what do fanatical facist muslim clerics think a " good muslim" should be?"

i'm not holding my breath though, brother. not holding my breath.

Well, now I have to apologize once again. I think I've gotten two similar posters mixed up again. I believe I asked that of stpvid or whatever. I apologize to 3cblue if I keep getting them mixed up.

269 storagemanager  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:05:38am

If we are willing to stand with anyone against Islam....then we stand for nothing.

270 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:08:04am

re: #269 storagemanager

Well Put!

271 Frank_Mtl  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:08:19am

I never thought I would ever read such vitriolic comments against Charles and LGF on Gates of Vienna.

272 blue_like_jazz  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:08:50am

ok, can someone help me out? i haven't had time to read the continuing saga of LGF and VB, although i appreciate the stand charles has taken and the research that's been done. so, anyway...

is the CURRENT leadership of VB anti-semitic? are the nazi sympathizers in power NOW?

273 Jimmah  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:10:29am

I don't see Fjordman attempt in any substantive way to deny the racial nationalism expressed by these groups, if anything he tries to justify it. Nor does he mention the deep disgust that the large majority of Europeans as well as Americans have for the racist right. In other words, a lot of typing up there, but little about the things that matter.

As for his complaint about Wikipedia being referenced, well, he's had a long time now to tell us what exactly in those quotes he thinks was false, particularly the policy statement from Sweden Democrats that laid bare their racially based nationalist agenda - but I haven't seen him produce anything but 'ha! you used wikipedia!'. What does that tell us?

274 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:10:47am

re: #242 Spiny Norman

And if Fjordman priority is a "white Europe" then he has no problem with European converts to Islam. Recall the LGF thread a few days ago about Hitler's views on Islam: that the Germans, because of their hardy warrior race, could have been excellent Muslims. And as such would have concurred the Muslim world and thereby the entire world.

275 Piglet-U93  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:11:03am

re: #269 storagemanager

If we are willing to stand with anyone against Islam....then we stand for nothing.

Because Saudi Arabia is our friend on the WOT its already true.

276 Thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:11:27am

re: #212 Spiritualized

re: #183 Thanos


That's exactly right, if you note he's alway been virulently against the war in Iraq.

From what I recall he was only against it in terms of the waste of coalition soldier's lives, and that if Shias and Sunnis want to kill each other then we should just leave them to it.

Nope, I've been in long discussions with him on it here in the past. He's got a "fortress europa" defense only mentality.

277 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:12:11am

re: #255 Killgore Trout

re: #242 Spiny Norman

Somebody posted a great article recently about Ayaan Hirsi Ali leaving Europe not so much from the fear of Jihadis but also because the European Nationalists (White Nationalists) who were supposed to be on her side were offering her increasingly weak support.

Yeah, I read that. Amazingly, the European anti-Islamization groups excuse the neo-Nazis in their ranks as "finding allies wherever we can find them", but someone as eloquent, confident and media-savvy as Ayaan Hirsi Ali is decidedly unwelcome.

Is "anti-Jihad" not their true agenda?

278 konservo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:12:36am

re: #272 blue_like_jazz

Yes. Watch the video in the "Video: A French Documentary on Vlaams Belang" above for starters, then check out the other links.

279 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:14:04am

re: #272 blue_like_jazz

Yes. Here's the current leadership of Vlaam Belang attempting to lay flowers on the graves of SS soldiers: Video: A French Documentary on Vlaams Belang

All but one of them is still in the party.

280 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:15:13am

re: #247 NoSubmission

Interesting times we live in.

And getting more interesting by the day....unfortunately.

281 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:16:16am

re: #272 blue_like_jazz

ok, can someone help me out? i haven't had time to read the continuing saga of LGF and VB, although i appreciate the stand charles has taken and the research that's been done. so, anyway...

is the CURRENT leadership of VB anti-semitic? are the nazi sympathizers in power NOW?

VB demands amnesty for Nazi collaborators, and lays flowers on the graves of the SS, so that would be a "yes".

282 Tigger2005  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:16:23am

re: #52 ratherdashing

re: #31 storagemanager

I just hate to see the infighting. No blame is being laid on anyone. I'm not in a position to do that without reading the entire saga.

It's not "infighting" when one side was never really "in."

We are not racists. We don't think "we" are better then "them" because of skin color, ethnicity, genetics, etc. We think our culture and ideas are better. The fact that the Enlightenment in politics, culture, economy, and science took place in white Northern Europe and blossomed in mostly white North America had nothing to do with skin color, it was a combination of historical forces and influences coming together in just the right way in a particular geographic region where the indigenous population happened to be white. Greek politics and philosophy, Roman law and culture, Judaism and Christianity, the historical accidents and events that prevented Europe from being overrun by Genghis Khan and by successive Islamic invasion attempts, the Rennaisance, and so on.

Europeans need to rediscover pride in their CULTURE, in their democratic ideals, and say to people of "color," "If you come here, we expect you to become Europeans. You can keep the best aspects of your old culture but you must lay aside anything that is not compatible with our laws and political systems. We believe "our" way of life is better, but we also believe it belongs to all humankind ... it is not a "white" way of life, anyone can embrace it if they choose. If you refuse to embrace our way of life, however, and if you seek to change it into something very different, we will have no choice but to take action."

But no, it's so much easier to make it a white/non-white issue.

283 Dead Sea Squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:17:08am

re: #272 blue_like_jazz

ok, can someone help me out? i haven't had time to read the continuing saga of LGF and VB, although i appreciate the stand charles has taken and the research that's been done. so, anyway...

is the CURRENT leadership of VB anti-semitic? are the nazi sympathizers in power NOW?

Also, read what Charles has about Koen Dillen. He's currently a VB parliamentarian.

284 Thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:18:33am

re: #242 Spiny Norman

re: #47 Killgore Trout

Notice that he's toned down his deportation rhetoric near the end of the article. He's learing to hide his true ambitions.
Fjordman's question to Charles.......
The indigenous population of all European nations is white. By extension, this means that if the natives want to preserve their majority, this means a white majority. So, if we say that we would like to limit all immigration, not just Muslim immigration, to ensure that the natives remain the majority in their own lands, is this to be considered racism? If so, does that mean that we have an obligation to commit cultural and demographic suicide because we are white?
He doesn't really want to deport just a few trouble making Muslims. He wants a White Europe. That means Asian, black and Jewish populations must be controlled. His population control has nothing to do with assimilation or ideology. It's based on skin color and genetics.

I take it you get the feeling, as I do, that Lebanese, Palestinian or Assyrian Christians are equally unwelcome in his "white Europe" view? What about the Egyptian Copts, the most persecuted Christians on the planet, are they as bad as the Jihadis?


The answer to that is given by Philip DeWinter -- before Turks and Kurds, he wanted to deport the Portugeuse in 1994. They are "swarthy skinned Europeans" but Europeans nonetheless. The culture and identity arguments pale before that obvious conflict, pardon the pun.

285 Macker  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:18:39am

One would have hoped that two World Wars in the 20th Century would have woken the Europeans up. It hasn't.
So to Fjordman, Gates of Vienna, Brussels Report, and Atlas...you're on the wrong side. If we're going to fight the Islamofascists, there can be NO taint whatsoever of past or present association with National Socialism in any way, shape, or form.
NONE.
NADA.
ZIP.
ZILCH.
ZERO.

286 ContraJihadi  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:21:24am

re: #111 karmic_inquisitor

I have only watched this so far and haven't commented, mainly because i have been preoccupied with fire damage.

But there is something here that folks need to recognize - Europe provides little space for middle ground when it comes to racial issues.

Most people around the world incorrectly think that Europeans are more racially tolerant than Americans. Having worked extensively in Europe, I can state flatly that such isn't true.

What you have in Europe are two camps - the vocal multiculturalists and the silent racists. Europe has not gone through the immigration / assimilation waves that the US has. Not the same history. In the US people understand that you can be for immigration controls and not be a racist (Cesar Chavez was against illegal immigration). Europe is far from there - you either embrace an ideology that is "virtuously" anti-nationalist (which pro European integration folks are) and therefore pro immigration and anti racism; or you are pro-nationalist (which inevitably means "white europe" in the current political landscape.

Sarkozy is a new breed - of immigrant heritage who is an assimilationist (De Gaulle is truning in hiis grave) but also for stronger immigration controls. He is called a racist by the left because he does not subscribe to their narrow ideology on racial matters.

Point is if you are vocal in wanting to preserve some fashion of European identity and nationality while wanting immigration reform and wanting to confront the islamist absolutists, you are going to have a hard time establishing a political identity that doesn't rub shoulders with the white nationalists. It will take some time and public focus for that to happen. Perhaps Charles's is providing a small catalyst of sorts.

In this I am not sympathetic to the white nationalists in the least - I just have experience in Western Europe that tells me that the "middle ground" is a space that is hard to occupy because most Europeans are unaware that a middle ground can exist - they have a binary view and the middle ground is just a slippery slope leading one to the other side.

I believe you have explained Fjordman's position: he sees no alternative between being overrun by jihadists and preserving a blood-and-soil "purity." What I don't understand, however, is why the likes of Baron Bodissey and Pamela Geller are siding with Fjordman against Charles's criticisms.

The only thing Fjordman has said that even approaches the mark is that action is needed and the kind of "Utopian" attitude of Charles's prevents action. It is not completely unfair for him to ask Charles what he would do, although it is clear that Charles is doing much in the way of educating the public about the threat of jihad. But Fjordman's evasiveness in confronting the still-live ties of VB to neo-nazism--he simply refuses to address the issue of the Odin's Cross--and his inability to even consider the liberal American preference for judging people on the content of their characters rather than on the color of their skins--these work to minimize the value of his call to action.

287 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:21:57am

re: #272 blue_like_jazz

1: Yes, although since 2004, they've tried very hard to hide that fact.

2: Yes, the questionable members are the leaders of the parties in question.

APPOINTMENT,
R

288 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:22:07am

I don't think fjordman would have felt comfortable at my daughters 2nd birthday party last Sunday. If you didn't count the 5 or six Jews in attendance then I think my father and I were the only white people at my house, everyone else being Asian, Mexican or black.

Nice party too, the kids had a great time.

289 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:23:48am

I still respect a lot of what Fjordman has done. Further, while its clear that some top people in VB still have strong white supremacist sympathies, I am not convinced the Swedish Democrats can't be reformed, as they have already booted some of their crazies.

I think there was a failure of communication, and people got their backs up, and I believe the whole result is unfortunate.


The main problem, and I don't know if Fjordman quite appreciates the difference, isn't immigration itself, but who is immigrating. If the concept of having a majority of the Norwegians (or Swedes, or Belch...) requires them to be ethnically Scandanavian, or whatnot, such that Christian Africans or Buddhist Asians need not apply, that is racist.

If the concept of keeping a majority of Norway Norwegian focuses not on skin color, but on immigrants accepting the language, the dominant culture, the work ethic, having respect for the larger society and its laws, than it is a fine thing. People that don't accept and respect the culture of their new country should be sent home.


It is hard to tell which definition Fjordman accepts.


I must admit, his idea that Islam is not reformable, I can't say for certain he is wrong. I do think, from what I have read, documentaries on television, and the such, that before Saudi petrodollars allowed the most Quranically correct form of Islam (as the 'Prophet' intended), the relatively modern but very archaic Wahabbi Sunnism, to spread around the world and re-infect areas where the original scourge of Islam that was spread by the sword had mellowed. My understanding is that the areas farthest from the Arabian source of infection, such as Morocco, Malaysia and Indonesia, had fairly tolerant forms of Islam that had learned to live with its neighbors. From what I understand, few Bosnian Muslims were devout, and the Serbian war against them, followed by an influx of Arab aid and fighters, and Islamic ideology, has turned that into a new center of jihad. So moderate Muslims did exist at one time, but I'm not sure they can really be recreated. Not saying that perhaps even a majority of Muslims don't want to live peacefully with their neighbors, just that a sufficient number have the original Islamic concept of jihad and the need to dominate their non-Muslim neighbors that even if closeted moderate Muslims exist, they can't really be trusted, nor could they freely proclaim their honest rejection of jihad.

No matter which definition of maintaining a European Europe that Fjordman actually has, it is clear that a leftist EU, which, like our Democrats at home, depend on an underclass on welfare to remain in power, make it difficult for people to oppose unchecked immigration. Which creates the unfortunate fact that people opposed to creeping sharia in their own countries may feel forced to turn to parties with questionable ideologies. Especially in Belgium, it would appear there are only two unpleasant choices, accept open Islamic immigration and the threat to the former dominant culture, or join forces with a party that clearly still has racists at the top.

290 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:23:54am
291 Eric Cartman's Conscience  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:25:09am

Considering this issue of Fjordman v. CJ I am reminded of a surprising and widely known Martin Amis quote:

There’s a definite urge—don’t you have it?—to say, “The Muslim community will have to suffer until it gets its house in order.” What sort of suffering? Not letting them travel. Deportation—further down the road. Curtailing of freedoms. Strip-searching people who look like they’re from the Middle East or from Pakistan. . . . Discriminatory stuff, until it hurts the whole community and they start getting tough with their children. . . . They hate us for letting our children have sex and take drugs—well, they’ve got to stop their children killing people.

No one who has read Amis could accuse him of being a Nazi or a sympathizer with a like cause, but his comments could be labeled fascistic by one wanting to have them so. The ugly truth about Europe and much of the west is that a living population is witnessing rapid changes in their world that they may not understand, care to seek to know, or even want. It is a sort of self-imposed reverse colonization where the elites of the home country project little concern for the preservation of their native culture and little care for how rapid changes within a culture are received by the native population. That many of these elites are cloistered bureaucrats can only further anger the man-on-the-street. When segments of a population see their concerns as being derided by state officials, state media, foreign actors, and even populations within their own state, (foremost among this last being the newly arrived populations themselves), many will become quite desperate and perhaps resort to dangerous forms of action, protest, and even violence. If violence from the right erupts in Europe (it is already there from the left and the "militants", you can bet groups like VB and SD will blame the state with a sort of "see what you forced us into".

I can't follow that thinking - I can't join that fight - but I can see how it might materialize.

292 derkrieger  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:25:23am

re: #270 ggt

re: #269 storagemanager

Well Put!

"A house divided cannot stand".

Divide and Conquer!

As I've said before, unless and until the mainstream parties in Europe address the concerns of average Europeans regarding Islamization, groups like VB, BNP, et al will only grow because there is no where else to turn. Europeans will find their backs against the wall and will take allies wherever they can find them. Against a united Islam in Europe disparate little groups cannot hope to withstand the steady march of Islam.

293 derkrieger  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:26:08am

Came home for lunch - time to get back to the office.

294 Globular Cluster  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:27:24am

I'm very surprised at Fjordman. He's been an excellent contributor to LGF -- very rational and well-supported analyses. It's troubling that he can't look at the evidence in this case and address the facts. That is what we do here at LGF -- we base our conclusions on facts, not the other way around. If the facts show that neo-Nazis are squirrling their way into the discourse on Eurabia, we point it out and don't support them.

Moonbats do this. They ally themselves with whatever scumbag ideology that happens to suit their temporary tactical purposes. We don't.

Sleep with dogs, wake up with fleas.

295 Dianna  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:28:47am

OT: There is an exercise simulating a bioterrorist attack at the San Jose Giants baseball stadium right now.

296 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:29:45am

re: #290 buzzsawmonkey

Hmmm, chiles rellenos.

Actually we served middle-eastern food: shawarma, tabouli, humus and rice. I guess fjordman would have preferred reindeer steaks and vodka.

297 Benthoven  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:29:46am

Though I've only been vaguely interested in this whole Vlams Belang issue, and fully understand Charles' squeamishness, when demonstrably racist entities seek to glom onto LGF's vanguard position in the anti-jihad world, there is something else we all have to come to grips with.

The entire infidel kuffar world is the target of islamic jihad, and it doesn't matter whether you're a pedigreed LGFer, moonbat, neo-nazi, Fjordman, Debbie Schlussel, Atlas Shrugging, ubangi primitives, or even fwench. As all of us are infidel kuffars, we make up a large set - comprised of many sub-sets, many of whom don't play well together. But, we all have the common enemy of islamic jihad, like it or not, and regardless of which subsets even know they are jihadi targets.

It's inevitable that occasionally, those with common mortal enemies are forced to put aside some differences with each other in order to defeat the more dangerous common enemy. History is replete with such examples. Sure, it took us another generation to defeat Stalin's communism after WWII after being allied to defeat Hitler, but imagine the consequences of a victorious Hitler had we not entered into such an unholy alliance.

Now, imagine the consequences of a victorious jihad.

Seems to me, racism is as old as humanity itself, and may take yet a few more generations to fully eradicate, but we've got a house afire right now.

298 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:29:52am

re: #288 Ringo the Gringo

He wouldn't be happy in the Very Far Western Suburbs of Chicago either. My son comes home from his private school with an Hispanic accent --as most of his classmates are Hispanic.

People who are fed-up with the Peoples Republic of Chicago move out West for a reason. Tax paying, law abiding citizens who take responsibility for their behavior and their the behavior of their children are leaving Chicago. I don't care what color or religion or nationality they are. I'm happy to have them as neighbors.

299 nolocon  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:31:04am

re: #227 MJ


Ronald Reagan visited Bitburg, Germany and laid a wreath of flowers at a German military cemetary containing SS soldiers' graves. The MSM loudly criticized Reagan as being anti-Semitic, fascist, etc.

Most of the criticism revolved around the notion that President Reagan was equating the perpetrators of the Holocaust with the victims of the Holocaust. In my opinion, the criticism was entirely justified.

That notion was false, and only makes my point. Reagan never made such a comparison, and to the contrary he highlighted the Holocaust more than any previous President. Reagan was neither anti-Semitic nor fascist ... not even close ... nothwithstanding the currently popular "anyone-laying-flowers-at-a-cemetary-with-SS-grav es-is-automatically-fascist" algorithm.

300 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:34:19am
301 Ringo the Gringo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:35:03am

re: #300 buzzsawmonkey

Good point.

302 realwest  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:37:12am

Hey y'all - just got back from doing some chores and have to leave shortly to do more.
I've been trying to read the thread down and have found that most if not all the minus dings on posts which support Charles and LGF are from a poster who's nic is Saywhat?
Saywhat?, since you're obviously out there somewhere, instead of just knocking other peoples opinions, how about posting your own opinions and views.

303 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:37:50am

Now I am hungry for Mexican. Good think there is an awesome taco place just a block away . . . .. The small business owner, Roberto, just opened a 2nd location. Our Lady of Guadelupe is predominate in every room.

304 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:41:34am

re: #302 realwest

He's been dinging my posts too. I noticed they're discussing me in the comments at Gates of Vienna, he's probably a supporter.

305 N_Jones  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:46:13am

re: #229 buzzsawmonkey

You would think that after the massive success of the Harry Potter books both here and in Europe, and the descriptions therein of the abuses committed in the name of "pure blood," more people would be alive to the dangers of judging people solely on the basis of external characteristics.

Yea... I'm sure no one even gets it. Movies are only for entertainment right?

306 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:46:39am
307 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:48:44am

re: #240 Elydo

re: #210 wahabicorridor

Daily Mail I know, but still... Sobering prospects.

This event happened over a year ago IIRC. Those Diesel/Electric boats are really, really quiet. Much more so than nuke boats, but they suffer from some serious problems, not the least of which is they have to come up near the surface, stick a snorkel up and run their VERY NOISY Diesel engines when their batteries run dry. Nuke boats make more noise since they have to run a reactor plant to turn her screw, which makes much more noise than electric motors.

There are several questions that come out of this however.

Why did the Chinese Captain surface amidst the US fleet at all? It would seem that this should have been kept a secret. Is a PR stunt worth losing a strategic advantage? Maybe his batteries were low and he simply could not wait for the fleet to leave the area to recharge.

Since the Kitty Hawk, the last of the Oil burner Carriers and more than 46 years from commissioning, is essentially a training ship at this point, were they even doing anti-sub operations? If not, why the hell not and whose head is going to roll (or has rolled given the time elapsed)?

Could this just be a ploy to generate more funding for a Navy that has felt the pinch of both the Clinton Administration and the Iraq War? A Navy that has been considering producing 2 Virginia class subs per year as opposed to the 1/yr currently budgeted.

Who is to say that the Chinese sub was not found and 'persuaded' to surface by a US sub? Flooded tubes and annoying pings could work just as effectively as a flashing red light in the rear view mirror. Just saying, since it seems odd that the sub came up where it did.

Disclosure: I was a US Navy Nuclear Machinists Mate when I served in the Navy. I currently work for a very large defense contractor that stands to make quite a lot of money making the above referenced Virginia class subs.

308 dmjung  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:49:43am

I haven't really followed this issue much, but at first blush some of the desire to have purity in anti-jihad sounds a little odd--kind of like Roosevelt not wanting to ally with Stalin to fight the Nazis. Or maybe expecting Evangelical Christians to hold their noses and rally around Giuliani. Everyone has "that line" they will not cross and I respect Charles' position re racist oriented anti-jihad--it is interesting seeing where everyone's line happens to be located and which one they think is most important.

309 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:53:29am

#288 Ringo the Gringo 11/14/07 10:22:07 am reply quote report 1

I don't think fjordman would have felt comfortable at my daughters 2nd birthday party last Sunday. If you didn't count the 5 or six Jews in attendance then I think my father and I were the only white people at my house, everyone else being Asian, Mexican or black.

Nice party too, the kids had a great time.


AMERICA!re: #288 Ringo the Gringo

310 MJ  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:54:38am

re: #299 nolocon

re: #227 MJ



Ronald Reagan visited Bitburg, Germany and laid a wreath of flowers at a German military cemetary containing SS soldiers' graves. The MSM loudly criticized Reagan as being anti-Semitic, fascist, etc.

Most of the criticism revolved around the notion that President Reagan was equating the perpetrators of the Holocaust with the victims of the Holocaust. In my opinion, the criticism was entirely justified.
That notion was false, and only makes my point. Reagan never made such a comparison, and to the contrary he highlighted the Holocaust more than any previous President. Reagan was neither anti-Semitic nor fascist ... not even close ... nothwithstanding the currently popular "anyone-laying-flowers-at-a-cemetary-wi th-SS-graves-is-automatically-fascist" algorithm.

Perhaps you should actually read something about the Bitburg Affair before you decide to defend visits to SS graves. Try reading Bitburg and Beyond edited by Ilya Levkov. As for saying Reaan was an anti-Semite or fascist, those are your words, not mine. However, the criticism of Reagan's visit the Bitburg went accross party lines and included groups such as the American Legion, Catholic War Veterans, and Jewish War Veterans.

311 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:54:47am

I hope the discussion on VB starts winding down. They have neo-Nazis in high places, a platform that calls for amnesty for all the 85 year old Nazi collaborators who aren't going to be prosecuted anyway, and Filip DeWinter is clearly a racist.


The only point of debate now is whether things are so bad we ally with Stalin to fight Hitler, or the neo-Nazis are so repugnant that we reject their support.


My view, I hope it isn't so bad we are in the Stalin situation, and making allies of racists and fascists probably loses more allies in the long run than it gains.


But people seem pretty set in their opinions.


We've had some pretty suspect posters get banned, but we've also had at least two usually good and insightful contributors who are gone, and I just hope we can move on soon.

312 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:56:44am

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk


I've been drunk with surface ship machinist mates who worked on nuclear reactors. Yes, the RM mechanics partied, but the ELTs really, really partied.

313 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:58:08am

re: #311 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet

I don't know Ed, I think this is a pivotal issue.

Is the enemy of my enemy my friend?

314 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:58:39am

re: #288 Ringo the Gringo

Oooh-I wanna party at your house!

315 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:59:20am

re: #302 realwest

Why argue when you can just ding?

316 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:59:28am

re: #312 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk


I've been drunk with surface ship machinist mates who worked on nuclear reactors. Yes, the RM mechanics partied, but the ELTs really, really partied.

How about that, I've been a drunk machinist mate who worked on nuclear reactors. (not at the same time)

317 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:00:23am

My house mate at prototype, who failed a urinalysis screen and got bounced, was at S8G, the really clean, quiet and well lit prototype for the Trident sub reactor plants. They had certain technologies that made them very quiet, which perhaps I shouldn't discuss.


The D1G prototype, now gone if I understand correctly, was noisy, had oily water in the bilges, was humid, and had certain places near the front of the engine room that were rather hot. If you know what I mean by hot.

Boy, I drank a lot of Gennessee Cream Ale.

318 realwest  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:00:51am

re: #304 Killgore Trout Yeah, I've been noticing that. But I read some 150 odd threads, top down and virtually all the minuses were by him or her. Since I only noticed these when I went to give a poster a plus, I can't even begin to guess how often he or she has done this.
I personally could not care less whether my posts get a plus or a minus; I post what I believe and people either agree or not. But if they do disagree I wish they would post a reply to me to tell me why and I'm sure you feel the same way.

319 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:01:46am

re: #313 ggt

re: #311 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet

I don't know Ed, I think this is a pivotal issue.

Is the enemy of my enemy my friend?


It is important, but people aren't changing their minds. Reminds me of arguments about the 'A' word, you either are on the correct side, or you're not, but no amount of debate influences the immoral and the amoral. So it is a discouraged topic of debate.

320 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:03:34am

re: #318 realwest

I personally could not care less whether my posts get a plus or a minus; I post what I believe and people either agree or not.


That gets a + from me.

321 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:03:46am

Leftist boss reacts to Spanish royal's verbal slap
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez demands King Juan Carlos apologize for 'shut up' diss — or risk investments

HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAAA

322 realwest  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:03:54am

re: #315 WriterMom Exactly. Please also see my #318. Just dinging most posts without debating or discussing them is, at the least, disingenuous.

323 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:06:21am

re: #317 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet

My house mate at prototype, who failed a urinalysis screen and got bounced, was at S8G, the really clean, quiet and well lit prototype for the Trident sub reactor plants. They had certain technologies that made them very quiet, which perhaps I shouldn't discuss.


The D1G prototype, now gone if I understand correctly, was noisy, had oily water in the bilges, was humid, and had certain places near the front of the engine room that were rather hot. If you know what I mean by hot.

Boy, I drank a lot of Gennessee Cream Ale.

I prototyped at S5G in Idaho, the plant for the USS Narwahl, aka the Ketchup bottle in the (by then empty) pool. Managed to get through a rather thick World History book on the bus rides to and from the site when I was there.

324 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:07:05am

re: #322 realwest

It's dingingenous.

325 samsgran1948  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:07:38am

re: #40 Ward Cleaver

re: #33 Dianna


re: #26 MJ

I don't recall him ever using anything except Fjordman.


I don't either.

On the old Yahoo boards there was a poster named number1waterman. Ever since I started reading LGF, I've strongly suspected that Fjordman and number1waterman were the same person.

I, too, am sorry Fjordman has gone off in a huff. I've enjoyed his writing. To be honest, I never noticed a "white man" bias, or a wanting to keep Europe for native Europeans. Anything of his I ever read, I simply assumed was not racist, but a desire to keep traditional European culture dominant in Europe, and not allow Islam to keep nibbling at the edges until it had consumed the whole cake.

But Charles is on the money: Fjordman needs to repudiate any connection between himself and white supremism. If Fjordman doesn't, he is as bad as the Islamics he abhors.

326 neocon hippie  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:07:44am

Has anybody seen this yet on Shrinkwrapped:

Family Squabbles

327 realwest  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:08:10am

Woops, chores are Yelling at me, not just calling! LOL!
I'd just like to finish my comments here (at least for today) by saying to all those who have said that they haven't been following this, or haven't read Charles (and BabbaZee's and others) research to please do so. This is an important issue and even though it will take some of your time, trust me on this - it's well worth your while to read the research.

Gotta run - hope Y'all have a GREAT DAY!

328 realwest  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:08:30am

re: #324 WriterMom
Thank you.

329 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:09:01am

re: #319 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet

I see your point. Too bad really.

If we can't discuss intelligently and rationally in Charles's house, where can we?

I am beginning to think it is a disconnect between Europe and America.

330 kuchuklambat  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:09:49am

Allright, people, making allies with Stalin's Soviet Union against fascist Axis -- good idea or bad?
Toning down US anti-Soviet media during the war -- good idea to a degree? or all bad?

This is what we are talkin about, isn't it? Distasteful (or worse) allies, whether to make them, how to manage the alliance if we do make it, etc?

331 Josephine  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:10:06am

Did you notice that he quoted the comment about the wagon but not Charles Johnson's clarification, which was a bit further down in the same thread?

From Fjordman's article:

"In response to this article, LGF reader marwan’s daughter commented that 'It looks like the majority of the conservative blogosphere actually supports the side defending Vlaams Belang. I hope Charles isn’t the one booted off the anti-jihad wagon.' Charles Johnson then replied that 'They can’t boot me off something I never jumped on.'

"Now I’m confused. Is Johnson indicating that the supposed anti-Jihad website Little Green Footballs is not a part of the anti-Jihad struggle? That would be very interesting information for many of his readers, and it sure would explain a lot of his behavior over the past weeks."

Sloppy or intentional? I don't know. Either way, it's inaccurate.

332 alpheus  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:11:55am

RE:#57 opnion 11/14/07 9:02:57 am reply quote report 0

Could somebody tell me how the Celtic cross got taken over as a symbol for White Supremacy.
It doesn't make sense to me. I just do not see any correlation

Charles covered it already. It's not a celtic cross, It's a modification of one that looks simular enought to fool a casual glance, but is it's own item.

333 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:13:14am

re: #331 Josephine

The whole things is so disingenuous and dishonest, it's really quite appalling. That kind of selective quoting is also in his little bit about Wikipedia. He's just throwing a whole bunch of unrelated garbage into the air to try to confuse the issues.

334 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:13:37am

"things" = thing

335 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:14:38am

Idaho Falls, how sad.


Most Ballston Spa people lived in Saratoga, which had an all girl college that had just gone co-ed, but most of the few males attending were flamers, Genessee Cream Ale was cheap and abundant, and Montreal was a 3 or 4 hour drive away.

Big hills/small mountains, lots of trees, snow in the winter.

And, believe it or not, a part of New York where most people listened to country and western, and quite a few people farmed.

336 Josephine  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:15:33am

re: #29 Poitiers-Lepanto

"Fourth Reich of the SnowWhites."

That has a great ring to it, LOL.

337 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:16:03am

S5G, was that the nuke school reactor? Three loops, one of them the check valve was on the other side of the RCP than the other 2 loops?

I drank a lot in Orlando.

338 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:16:43am

Of course, they didn't have a reactor in Orlando. But the generic reactor of nuke school. The one in the books, I mean.

339 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:18:27am

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk

Somebody here said this was an old story re-cycled. I remember reading a similar story 6? months ago, and there were a few fishy details then. I suspect some information warfare going on against China. Maybe the US Navy DID spot the sub long before it surfaced and just let it be to see what it would do. Then the USN would have 2 advantages; learning Chinese tactics and fooling them into thinking they can't be seen.

BTW, I envy you your job -I love big ships, it must be fun to work on building them. More power to you, and federal budget appropriations too.

340 alpheus  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:19:45am

By losing "Pamela" you dont' mean Pamela of "Atlas" fame, do you?

341 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:20:27am

re: #329 ggt

I am beginning to think it is a disconnect between Europe and America.

There has always been a disconnect. Europeans have been more aware of it than Americans - naturally, as they cause most of it.

This might interest you.

A Genealogy of Anti-Americanism

Developed over a period of more than two centuries by many diverse thinkers, the concept of America has involved at least five major layers or strata, each of which has influenced those that succeeded it. The initial layer, found in the scientific thought of the mid-eighteenth century, is known as the "degeneracy thesis." It can be conceived of as a kind of prehistory of anti-Americanism, since it occurred mostly before the founding of the United States and referred not just to this country but to all of the New World. The thesis held that, due chiefly to atmospheric conditions, in particular excessive humidity, all living things in the Americas were not only inferior to those found in Europe but also in a condition of decline. An excellent summary of this position appears, quite unexpectedly, in The Federalist Papers. In the midst of a political discussion, Publius (Alexander Hamilton) suddenly breaks in with the comment: "Men admired as profound philosophers gravely asserted that all animals, and with them the human species, degenerate in America -- that even dogs cease to bark after having breathed awhile in our atmosphere."

342 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:20:36am

re: #330 kuchuklambat

Allright, people, making allies with Stalin's Soviet Union against fascist Axis -- good idea or bad?
Toning down US anti-Soviet media during the war -- good idea to a degree? or all bad?

This is what we are talkin about, isn't it? Distasteful (or worse) allies, whether to make them, how to manage the alliance if we do make it, etc?

Stalin alliance. Unavoidable at the time. I'm thinking that Europe believed itself to be under a greater, more immediate threat, than it believes itself to be under now. Toning down the media during the effort was all part of holding our noses until it was done. Hard to call it good or bad since it had aspects that fell into both of those columns. On the whole, looking back, I have to say good(little g) since we achieved our objectives, but it certainly left a bad aftertaste.

On our currently dilemma, aligning ourselves with neo-nazis/white supremacists is Bad(big B). I may think differently if this breaks out into a shooting war with Islamists lobbing nukes around, but we are far from that now.

343 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:20:38am

re: #332 alpheus

I love it! A basic Mandala which is a gestalt from the beginning of time has been appropriated by every religion and every group.

It's a circle with two lines crossing within it. It's found in primitive artwork and is one of the first things children draw.

While I understand different versions of it have specific meanings to individuals and groups --I can't help finding humor in it.

Can you tell I've studied Mandala's as an art form?

344 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:21:39am

re: #340 alpheus

By losing "Pamela" you dont' mean Pamela of "Atlas" fame, do you?

Paid attention much?

345 PIERRE_LEGRAND[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:22:58am
346 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:23:40am

re: #332 alpheus

Odin's Cross is not Celtic, it's Norse in origin. The Nazis were big into pre-Christian Germanic mythologies and ethnology. They were also very wrong about some of the anthropology: the ancient Aryians didn't look like Germans; the Gypsies were closer to real Aryians than Hitler and his gang.

347 alpheus  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:24:00am

re: #340 alpheus

By losing "Pamela" you dont' mean Pamela of "Atlas" fame, do you?

Paid attention much?
No. I travel and aren't able to log in sometimes for days.
FILL ME IN....

348 neocon hippie  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:25:05am

Here's another relevant blog post:

Europe's Binary Problem

349 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:25:22am

re: #345 PIERRE_LEGRAND

Are you blog pimping? What is your point exactly?

What we are discussing is whether or not fjordman supports or disavows "WHITE" nationalism in Europe.

350 drogheda  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:25:50am

RE #302, 304, 306

How are you seeing who +/- rated a post?

351 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:26:11am

re: #347 alpheus

re: #340 alpheus

By losing "Pamela" you dont' mean Pamela of "Atlas" fame, do you?

Paid attention much?
No. I travel and aren't able to log in sometimes for days.
FILL ME IN....

See the links Charles posted at the top of the page? Click on the 2nd - "When Friends Attack".

352 PIERRE_LEGRAND[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:28:42am
353 jaunte  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:29:01am

In reading all of the explanations of the Vlaams Belang controversy from the point of view of Fjordman, Paul Belien, and numerous european commenters at a variety of weblogs, I'm hearing a desire to 'move along' and 'really do something to fight the jihadists, like have regular conferences, and support transgressive artists like Lars Vilks. Other than these ideas, I'm not seeing a European anti-jihad program. Websites are being written, and read. Political alliances, like the dubious one Charles had the 'temerity' to question, are being formed.
Maybe something will happen.

In the meantime, I think it's worth pointing out that more than a million US troops have actually been deployed to kill jihadists since 9/11/2001. The US is currently sacrificing real lives and treasure in this fight, and I am getting heartily SICK of hearing complaints from europeans who are beginning to awaken because their local ox has been gored, and are willing to make any deal with any handy devil to take their pain away.

354 J.S.  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:30:20am

re: #17 storagemanager

Frankly, I think it undermines the credibility of this website.” I meant that and I still do. It’s quite significant that Jihad Watch linked to this story whereas LGF refused to do so.

I have been thinking hard...about alot of comments I see there.

Could you elaborate? (just curious...I haven't read anything there (JW) for a while (just glance at the site)...I think a lot of the posts are "over-the-top" and they don't get deleted...hmmmm...I recall one poster (from australia? i believe), at first he was OK, then I believe he got death threats from the RoP and he was "outed" by some rank/disgusting "journalist"-- after that -- forget it...totally "out of it..." (poster also got banned from LGF)...he just got more and more radicalized...and his comments became more and more incendiary...(still posts at JW, I believe).

355 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:31:19am

re: #338 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet

No. It was very experimental, but still only had two loops. They built a hull mockup and floated it in a big pool, then using a VERY big gyro at one end, tested it at the angles that a sub would be working at. Also had a funky steam turbine that didn't need reduction gears. As I recall, the Narwahl was pretty much a ghost in the water as a result, but cost about 3 times what a typical Sturgeon class did. I don't know what the basic plant was that they taught at Nuke School. I was in class 8707 IIRC in Orlando.

356 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:32:13am

re: #341 wahabicorridor

"beginning to think" was probably a bad qualifier. I think deToqueville talked about how the Europeans "looked down" on Americans. It's been a long time coming.

The race issue is something Americans interpret in a way all their own. There is no way anyone even remotely smelling like white-power is going to be taken seriously over here --by whites or anyone else.

Many would have a hard time determining their actual race. I'm not sure I could tell you all of my ancestry or at least prove it. Neither side of my family has any records showing entrance to this country --nothing from Ellis Island or any ship manifest. All of my families vital records were lost during the Civil War.

Many people with my last name are black, many are white. Am I suppossed to side with one side because I share their skin color? It's an unusual name and legend says there was some "intermingling."

I find the whole "white Power" issue laughable.

357 Globular Cluster  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:32:50am

re: #353 jaunte

In the meantime, I think it's worth pointing out that more than a million US troops have actually been deployed to kill jihadists since 9/11/2001. The US is currently sacrificing real lives and treasure in this fight, and I am getting heartily SICK of hearing complaints from europeans who are beginning to awaken because their local ox has been gored, and are willing to make any deal with any handy devil to take their pain away.

+1

358 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:32:53am

re: #352 PIERRE_LEGRAND

This seems less wise than working from inside the groups to moderate the tempers of the more imflammatory

Gee, why didn't the Southern Poverty Law Center think of that before they sued the KKK?

359 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:33:06am

re: #345 PIERRE_LEGRAND

Charles did you actually read fjordman's piece? It doesn't seem so.

Fjordman did in fact respond to your posts. In fact he called on the disassociation of various groups from La Pen.

Yes, I read it. And no, he did not respond to any of the points in my list above.

360 Pastorius  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:35:06am

Hi Charles,
I know you don't have time to address every comment or question, but Paul Belien, in his radio interview with Pamela, said that the video of the current leadership of the VB laying wreaths on the graves of Nazis was a distortion. He said the "Nazis" were merely people who had sided with the Nazis in their fight against the Communists in the Soviet Union.

What, if anything, do you have to say in response to that?

The one thing that really sticks with me is the video of DeWinter's home and how he has the photograph of himself with Le Pen prominently displayed on his bookshelf.

That speaks volumes.

361 Dead Sea Squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:35:36am

re: #326 neocon hippie

Has anybody seen this yet on Shrinkwrapped:

Family Squabbles

I left a comment there.

362 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:36:20am

re: #353 jaunte

>In the meantime, I think it's worth pointing out that more than a million US troops have actually been deployed to kill jihadists since 9/11/2001. The US is currently sacrificing real lives and treasure in this fight, and I am getting heartily SICK of hearing complaints from europeans who are beginning to awaken because their local ox has been gored, and are willing to make any deal with any handy devil to take their pain away.

363 so.cal.swede  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:36:38am

re: #165 gman

re: #159 Ringo the Gringo

Hey Charles, Maybe you need to add a fascist character to the LGF logo of the moonbat and the Islamist at the top of the page.

love it! That would be perfect and would send a clear message!

Nazis stay away!


Awesome idea, we need a skinhead or something in that picture.


I've tried to look more into Vlaams Belang, and I've met the same kind of front that Fjordman put up here. They refuse to even attempt to discuss the issues you present, like the Odin's cross, nazi connections, etc. Instead they just bellow on about how islamists are taking over Europe and Vlaams Belang being the only party trying to stop it.

I smell a rat... a white power rat, to be exact.

364 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:37:51am

sorry,

I hit the + button on that post!

365 Pastorius  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:38:16am

By the way, Fjordman agrees with me on the point about Le Pen:


"... out of all the information published by LGF, a lot of which is nonsense or outdated or both, the one piece of information that I disliked the most was VB’s connection to Jean-Marie Le Pen from the FN in France through the Identity, Tradition, Sovereignty group at the European Parliament. I don’t like Le Pen at all and consider it to be poor judgment by the VB to have even a formal link to that party. They should seriously consider cutting that link in the future. It’s not helpful. "


Thing is, to me that is a damning piece of evidence that VB is willing to put up with racism, if they are not outright racists themselves (which they seem to be). But, to Fjordman, that is merely something that is "not helpful."

tsk tsk

366 Bubblehead II  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:38:21am

re: #240 Elydo


And this is why Submariners smugly state that there are only TWO types of ships. Submarines and TARGETS! When I was on-board the U.S.S Guitarro (SSN 665) we routinely penetrated the carrier escort screen, got off our shot and left before they even realized they were dead. Fast, Silent, Deadly. U.S. Submarine Force. BTW, I was a "coner" and not a nuke. :)

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk

Yep, the DE's are a pain to detect or track. Unless the crew screws up and cavitates or makes some other hull/sea noise (both bad things in the Submarine world they are nearly impossible to detect.

367 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:38:46am

re: #339 Kenneth

That's a different division that does that work. My division does software, and I do too when I am not wasting time commenting on LGF.

368 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:39:48am

re: #367 CyanSnowHawk


LGF is never a waste of tiem :)

On that note, I do have things to do --a nap is calling.

Have a great day all!

369 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:41:54am

re: #361 Dead Sea Squirrel

re: #326 neocon hippie


Has anybody seen this yet on Shrinkwrapped:

Family Squabbles


I left a comment there.

You were more polite than I would have been. "Narcissism of small differences" my ass.

370 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:42:50am

re: #360 Pastorius

I understand that many sided with Nazi Germany for nationalistic reasons. However they quickly figured out that the Nazis were screwing them. These were not lackeys who didn't know what they were getting into. They were elite SS soldiers and knew what they were doing. I never figured out the reason for the date (second thursday in November or something). The reason why much of Europe bans these pilgrimages to Nazi sites is because many people still support a return to their fascist past. Also don't forget about Dewinter's signed picture from Degrelle and advocating for the pardon of Nazi war criminals. The Vlaams leadership has very clear Nazi sympathies.

371 PIERRE_LEGRAND[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:43:22am
372 UrbanRevival  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:43:42am

I do not know why, but I am deeply saddened by the whole thing.

I feel that the work that Fjordam et al have done precludes them from any judgement (likewise you too, Charles). There is some validity to the micro vs macro view of this whole thing, and I think you both may have pinned yourselves into a corner.

Even if they could, I fear that Europe doesn't have the time to worry about this. I think it's possible that we Americans do not truly, and fully, understand it.

In the comming clash, if a Nazi would fight with us, would we turn him away? I don't know. It's a big, big question. But turning against each other now isn't the answer. Apart, we will not win this.

373 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:43:49am

PIERRE_LEGRAND, I have always found the best way to separate myself from groups and people I disagree with is to loudly say. "I'm not with those assholes!" and to leave groups I disagree with. With fringe groups like VB death by attrition seems the best way, leave the group and condemn them, don't try to make shit lest shitty.

374 TalkinKamel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:44:09am

#362 ggt

I agree. 100%.

As I pointed out in a post to Pierre Legrand yesterday, what, actually, has Vlaams Belang done to try and save Europe, other than laying wreaths on Nazi graves and striking poses?

375 Dead Sea Squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:46:08am

re: #352 PIERRE_LEGRAND

What, Stalin again? Alright, one more time:

There is a difference between (1) forming alliances to influence the political process and bring positive change in order to avoid a meltdown, a war, and (2) forming alliances after the breakdown has occurred and a hot war has erupted, suspending rule of law for rule of force.

We're told that the European house is on fire. Well then, why don't they round up all the guns they can squeeze, and assassinate their leaders, and turn it into a real war, since you-all keep saying we are already in the real war? At that point, if the VBers and their buddies want to help, well sure, grab a gun. That's where the Stalin analogy enters, and not before.

But that's not what is happening. These are political alliances in the hope of effecting political change, non-violently. Eagerness to make a deal with the Devil at that point only means you don't think the Devil is all that bad.

376 TalkinKamel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:48:24am

#349 WriterMom

A valiant try, WriterMom, but give it up. Pierre's basically a racist, demanding we accept his skewed view of the world. He's far more interested in "whiteness" and proving that black I.Q.'s are lower than white I.Q.'s then he is in opposing Islam----and, in demonstrating this, he provides an excellent example of why guys like him just can't be relied on as allies.

377 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:49:03am

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

Where are you quoting from?

So, what you are saying is that the colour of someone's skin matters the most to you, and to other Europeans? It doesn't matter what religion they are, or what their beliefs are-if there skin isn't white, they don't count and should go the hell back to where they came from? That is exactly what most of us find so repugnant.


And are you suggesting that the melting pot is some kind of Jewish conspiracy or plot?

378 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:49:59am

And cough up your sources for your quotes.

379 ggt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:51:03am

Ok, I am really going to nap.

For anyone who things they are purely anything --why not find out?. Of course, these people are probably members of the Flat Earth Society. Science and reason don't apply.

teehee

380 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:51:44am

re: #377 WriterMom

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

And are you suggesting that the melting pot is some kind of Jewish conspiracy or plot?

I think he's arguing that it never existed except in the minds of certain Jewish liberals.

381 Dead Sea Squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:52:12am

re: #377 WriterMom

He's saying he likes the European "soft" racism or racialism, or whatever acceptable term you want to give it, and thinks the American ideal of a color-blind community of people with a shared vision is self-deluded folly.

382 CyanSnowHawk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:53:09am

re: #352 PIERRE_LEGRAND

Woah, slow down there Tex. It's not a choice of Europe IS/IS NOT threatened. I said that I think aligning ourselves with neo-nazi/white supremacists was BAD. Hyperbole does not help, nor would losing other allies because of associations with extremists. I don't consider our situation to be so extreme that we should throw caution to the wind.

Glad I checked the rest of the posts before I posted this PL.

GAZE.

383 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:53:56am
Melting pot of nationalities....because it was assumed that most of the immigrants would be coming from Europe. No one dreamed that anyone might think we could "melt" into our nation everyone in the world. Why do we force the Europeans to do so?


ummm because you won't get European immigration into Europe?
America in 1807 is different than American in 1907 and America in 2007. But it's still America, it has it's uniquely American character no matter what the color of it's citizens. This is the triumph of America. Europe needs to find a way to do this as well. Either that or succumb to genocides and deportations. Sahid, living in Brussels, needs to think of himself as a citizen of Belgium first and an ethnic Egyptian second. As civilizations and countries contiune to grow, they will inevitably become multi-ethnic.

384 justnobody  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:55:04am

re: #360 Pastorius

The answer to your question is very simple. The Vlaams Belang people are unhygienic opportunists. They don't care who they're aligned with - whether it's Israel or skinhead punks or Nazi war criminals. The definitive answer to the question whether DeWinter is a neo-Nazi is known only to himself, so I think it's a waste of time trying to prove it.

Also, I think that DeWinter is doing a huge disservice to the Flemish nationalists by taking them back to the days of the III Reich. But that's their problem.

385 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:55:06am

re: #380 Spiny Norman

Oh those WILD AND WACKY JEWS!

386 TalkinKamel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:55:06am

#375 Dead Sea Squirrel

And, of course, we've all seen how this sort of deal making with old Scratch works in real life.

The deal is made, originally, as a necessary evil; we don't really like Mr. Pitchfork, but we need him. Then, people will start saying stuff like "Well, Mr. Pitchfork's a bad guy, but at least he gets the job done!" Then it's "Mr. Pitchfork's not such a bad guy, he's on our side, isn't he?" And THEN it's "Mr. Pitchfork's not bad, he's on our side and he's actually got some pretty good ideas!" at which point the game's pretty much over, the Rubicon's crossed and the die is cast.

You see this all the time, in businesses, clubs, etc. It's the way the Democratic party went from being a pretty sane group of individuals to being a pack of screaming, Marxist moonbats; it's the old bad-money-drives-out-good principal.

And as for Stalin---well, I've always thought we trusted him too much during WWII, ceded too much to him and let him grab too much power. That's one of the reasons I'm not eager for us to get ensnared in another dubious alliance with people who might turn out as nasty as Stalin was. . .

387 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:55:40am

re: #379 ggt

Ok, I am really going to nap.

For anyone who things they are purely anything --why not find out?. Of course, these people are probably members of the Flat Earth Society. Science and reason don't apply.

teehee

Never did to them. The F-man wouldn't like my neighborhood either, south of you, in the very multi-ethinic SW 'burbs. He'd have hated my elementary school too - it was 1/3, 1/3, and 1/3 of each (white, black, latino).

388 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:55:56am

re: #381 Dead Sea Squirrel

Can you spell E-U-G-E-N-I-C-S? I knew you could...

389 jaunte  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:55:58am

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

"No one dreamed that anyone might think we could "melt" into our nation everyone in the world. Why do we force the Europeans to do so?"

One further comment about the Vlaams Belang controversy. The drama
has reached absurd levels. From Baron Bodissey's posting entitled
"A Utopianism That Demands Self-Destruction" to the above referenced comment, the language used has gone over the top. Reluctance to join forces with suspected racial supremacists is hardly 'Utopianism', and if it results in 'Self-Destruction', the self-destroying entity wasn't worth much as allies.
Sound to me like a massive helping of sour grapes.
No one is 'forcing' the europeans to do anything. If I could, I'd 'force' them to eliminate the dole in their countries, and that would clear up most of their immigration problem.

390 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:58:07am

re: #372 UrbanRevival

I think it's possible that we Americans do not truly, and fully, understand it.

I agree, most Americans do not. But most of us at LGF most certainly do - and have actually been criticized for being 'apocolyptic' about Eurabia, which we are told is a myth. We understand full well that the threat to Europe is not just real, but imminent.

The disconnect is that Americans don't understand how deeply Europeans hold the 'race=culture' meme. And Europeans don't understand why Americans won't tolerate it.

391 Bearster  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:59:05am

re: #308 dmjung

I haven't really followed this issue much, but at first blush some of the desire to have purity in anti-jihad sounds a little odd--kind of like Roosevelt not wanting to ally with Stalin to fight the Nazis. Or maybe expecting Evangelical Christians to hold their noses and rally around Giuliani. Everyone has "that line" they will not cross and I respect Charles' position re racist oriented anti-jihad--it is interesting seeing where everyone's line happens to be located and which one they think is most important.

I think your analogy is flawed. I think it is not a matter of how much "impurity" that one is willing to work with in order to help achive one's goals. I think the issue is that working with evil works against one's goals.

Naziism is not an alternative to islamism. It is the same thing: a murderous and tyrannical idealogy based on collectivism.

"It doesn't matter whether the lion or the tiger wins, the rabbit is eaten for dinner either way."

392 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 11:59:21am

re: #386 TalkinKamel

Stalin, Stalin, Stalin...haven't they got any better comebacks than Stalin.

{yawn}

393 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:00:37pm

re: #390 wahabicorridor

But they are very specific about their whiteness...white Jews--> thumbs down.

394 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:01:35pm

re: #389 jaunte

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND
"No one dreamed that anyone might think we could "melt" into our nation everyone in the world. Why do we force the Europeans to do so?"

One further comment about the Vlaams Belang controversy. The drama
has reached absurd levels. From Baron Bodissey's posting entitled
"A Utopianism That Demands Self-Destruction" to the above referenced comment, the language used has gone over the top. Reluctance to join forces with suspected racial supremacists is hardly 'Utopianism', and if it results in 'Self-Destruction', the self-destroying entity wasn't worth much as allies.
Sound to me like a massive helping of sour grapes.
No one is 'forcing' the europeans to do anything. If I could, I'd 'force' them to eliminate the dole in their countries, and that would clear up most of their immigration problem.

Exactly the point BS and SD supporters are doing all sorts of mental gynastics to avoid.

395 TalkinKamel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:01:38pm

WriterMom & Dead Sea Squirrel

Guys like Pierre Legrand and Vlaams Belang are far more interested in preserving "whiteness" then they are in pushing back Islam in Europe, or anyplace else. (I mean take a look at Europe; they've done a real bang-up job saving it so far, haven't they?/Sarc.off.)

I suspect that, presented with an Adam Gadahn, a Johnny Taliban or a Moslem from some acceptable white race, they'd actually be perfectly okay with him. Hitler thought the Grand Mufty was just fine, because he was fair-haired and Nordic looking. And these are the guys were supposed to just shut up and accept as allies, without taking a good, hard look at them. . .

396 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:04:25pm

re: #388 WriterMom

re: #381 Dead Sea Squirrel

Can you spell E-U-G-E-N-I-C-S? I knew you could...


Wanna get an EUweenie to shut up? Try this.

In the EU Constitution, eugenics is forbidden. It is a one line declarative sentence. No ambiguity.

Ask them what happens when a British woman finds she is carrying a baby w/Downs Syndrome and chooses to terminate. Is she guilty of eugenics? Is the gov't of the UK, as the healthcare is nationalized, The National Health Service.

397 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:04:42pm

*VB and SD supporters*

:^þ

398 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:06:07pm

The American "alliance" with Stalin was extremely one sided and lasted for less than four years.

Given a choice between _itler and Stalin, the answer seems obvious, in hindsight.

We're not going to ally with _itler's followers this time either.

UNDER
STAND,
R

399 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:06:09pm

re: #397 Spiny Norman

*VB and SD supporters*

:^þ

Well, they both support a lot of BS, so your comment is still accurate. :-)

400 so.cal.swede  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:06:22pm

re: #372 UrbanRevival


In the comming clash, if a Nazi would fight with us, would we turn him away? I don't know. It's a big, big question. But turning against each other now isn't the answer. Apart, we will not win this.

Ok, don't be ignorant. There will never be a "race war" or something Charles-Mansonian where we have to pick sides.

GRRRRR! I wish Americans would stop thinking in binary!

401 Josephine  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:07:12pm

re: #315 WriterMom

re: #302 realwest

Why argue when you can just ding?

Dueling dings.

402 so.cal.swede  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:08:20pm

re: #391 Bearster
"It doesn't matter whether the lion or the tiger wins, the rabbit is eaten for dinner either way."


WELL SAID!

403 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:09:03pm

re: #400 so.cal.swede

I wish Americans would stop thinking in binary!

I used to get paid big bucks for thinking in hex.

;D

404 neocon hippie  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:09:04pm

re: #232 NY Nana

re: #11 Innismir

My parents zt"l are buried in Sharon Memorial Park. I feel like puking.

My parents, brother, paternal grandparents and others are buried at Sharon Memorial Park also.

405 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:09:49pm
406 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:10:33pm

There were a number of alarming posts from fjordman that I thought were a bit out there. The one that sticks in my mind:

Highrise: I'm here because I feel forced to. The Counterjihad Summit was the first of its kind in Europe, and the systematic negative focus generated by LGF is damaging. I'm also here because I'm angry at the implied thinking behind this debate, where there is a Nazi lurking behind every bush in Europe and where every European who simply wants to preserve something of his heritage, just like everybody else on the planet wants to do, is a racist scumbag. I sense a clear anti-European bias here and it pisses me off.

No, I'm not enjoying this. I'm already days behind schedule with the work I was planning to do. I had no particular intention of picking a fight with Charles, but I will if I have to. I will.

Hey fjordman, next time you refer to Charles as a coward or something similar, ask yourself, who is writing under a pen name and whose real name is out there.

407 smill1953  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:10:47pm

I think LGF has devoted quite enough bandwidth to this guy.

408 Josephine  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:11:31pm

re: #333 Charles

re: #331 Josephine

The whole things is so disingenuous and dishonest, it's really quite appalling. That kind of selective quoting is also in his little bit about Wikipedia. He's just throwing a whole bunch of unrelated garbage into the air to try to confuse the issues.

I can't trust him to be an accurate source of information.

409 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:11:41pm

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

Remember Me

As I said before, you need to get some reality. Stop slinging your turds without doing the necessary fact- checking.

410 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:11:46pm

re: #372 UrbanRevival

The nazi's are unacceptable at anytime, for any reason.

For the same reason the tortoise should never give the scorpion a ride across the river.

BELANG
IS
BLOK,
R

411 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:12:23pm

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

This hallucination that many of you seem to operate under that the United States was filled with colorful people in this big grand melting pot is a bunch of bullshit.

Fuck off you racist peice of shit.

412 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:12:24pm

re: #405 buzzsawmonkey

In 1965, President Kennedy had been dead for two years.

'scuse me while I bust a gut........................

413 Suzette  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:12:49pm

Three dramatic exists........
And a very 'wordy' essay that don't even address the issues but make excuses. Hmmmmmmm....

Don't ask me why but the term 'drama queen' comes to mind for me.

414 Suzette  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:15:53pm

Darn it~!

*don't = doesn't*

415 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:16:05pm

PIERRE_LEGRAND is on the Pajamas Media blogroll along with Atlas, Gates of Vienna and Brussels Journal. PJ Media has a HUGE problem.

416 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:16:12pm
417 Elydo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:16:33pm

re: #366 Bubblehead II

Heh heh. I don't know any submariners, to my misfortune. My grandfather was Royal Navy, but he was surface fleet. Survived both the Malta and Russian convoys, but died just before they were allowed to march in the Remembrance Day parade with their white berets. I was upset by that, and by how few survivors of those convoys there were left.

418 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:16:51pm

The whole discussion here is becoming inane. Mr. Johnson owns this blog so he can take any position he wishes though I think he could have handled it differently and not caused any bridge burnings and still maintained his principled stance.

Discussion is useless due to several well meaning zealots who are shouting down everyone else. My own assessment is that one side is to simplistic and the other to trusting with no middle ground for realpolitik (spit) which may unfortunately be called for in this case. Exactly what groups are there, which pass PC purity checks, that are not part of the multicultural miasma problem? Specific names please. Hell, what groups are there in the US that can fully meet the alluded to criteria?

As for Europe I'll be blunt. I've got about 5 years of living time in Europe (US military) and don't have a very high opinion of a good chunk of the place or it's people. Many are provincial to a degree exceeding what they accuse Americans of being. The various factional undercurrents, across the continent, are confusing to an outsider. The cultural and social differences from America are subtle at times and hard to pin down. The situation in Europe has some bad potentials. We have a noticeable chance of hearing "round three" being called there and getting sucked in. I'd rather not see it but our choices may come down to supporting some distasteful clique or taking the simplistic route of nuking em from orbit as the only way of being sure. I do think more highly of the Eastern Europeans and would try to spare them.

Note, before some of the aforementioned zealots start labeling me a white supremacy supporter. I'm Nordic Cherokee with a Korean wife, a half black grand-daughter and (if my son ever gets busy) a future half Chinese grand-child. Yep, the Aryan brotherhood invites me to lunch regularly..... Label me if you so desire, just be glad I can't legally invite you to early morning coffee and pistols.

419 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:17:30pm

re: #415 Killgore Trout

...and Miniter.

HOUSE
CLEANING,
R

420 so.cal.swede  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:20:45pm

re: #418 Steel Rain

Many are provincial to a degree exceeding what they accuse Americans of being. The various factional undercurrents, across the continent, are confusing to an outsider. The cultural and social differences from America are subtle at times and hard to pin down.

A very accurate observation.

421 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:21:19pm

re: #418 Steel Rain

just be glad I can't legally invite you to early morning coffee and pistols.

You can't? Hon, you need to move down here w/us in Virginia.

422 jaunte  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:21:50pm

"Highrise: I'm here because I feel forced to.
Victim of forces beyond his control.
The Counterjihad Summit was the first of its kind in Europe,

One small salute.


and the systematic negative focus generated by LGF is damaging.

In what way?


I'm also here because I'm angry at the implied

(my interpretation of the)

thinking behind this debate,
where there is a Nazi lurking behind every bush in Europe

Now we're over the top!


and where every European who simply wants to preserve something of his heritage, just like everybody else on the planet wants to do, is a racist scumbag.
I sense a clear anti-European bias here and it pisses me off.

I think it was the racist scumbags that were being criticized. Are you saying 'count me in'?

No, I'm not enjoying this. I'm already days behind schedule with the work I was planning to do.

Victimized again, through no fault of your own,


I had no particular intention of picking a fight with Charles, but I will if I have to. I will."

Hold me back, boys, Why I otta....
423 Uriah_lost  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:22:02pm

I wrote off GOV and Fjordman when they started on the whole NAFTA superhighway, etc, etc. thing. Sad, really.

424 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:22:16pm

"My own assessment is that one side is to simplistic and the other to trusting with no middle ground for realpolitik (spit) which may unfortunately be called for in this case"

So, we're either simpletons or pushovers? Let me guess, you're right in the middle standing on the "Holy" ground.

425 Bearster  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:22:46pm

In continuing to read the messages on this thread, I keep seeing a common error.

The house is burning, let's not worry about the "purity" of the water hose! We need action now, no time for thinking!

Let me ask a few rhetorical questions:
1) When a house is burning, there is literally no time to think. The difference between escaping to safety vs. being burned to death can be a matter of seconds or minutes. Is Europe really "burning" the way this analogy suggests?

2) A child often acts without thought. For example, fire looks fun, so a child can strike matches one by one and then drop them on the floor when they burn out (or get too hot to hold). What do you think are the consequences of "act now, think later" for armies with machine guns, submarines, bombers, and nuclear bombs?

Put down the f-----g matches and think first!

426 UrbanRevival  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:24:46pm

re: #400 so.cal.swede

So.cal.swede,

You make me smile. You request that I not be ignorant, but you do not even know of what clash I am referring. Who said anyghing about a race war?

427 so.cal.swede  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:25:34pm

re: #426 UrbanRevival

re: #400 so.cal.swede

So.cal.swede,

You make me smile. You request that I not be ignorant, but you do not even know of what clash I am referring. Who said anyghing about a race war?

I assumed you meant a clash between western civ. and islamism. was I incorrect?

428 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:25:43pm

re: #419 Render

That's right. We were invaded long ago but we're just now waking up to it.

429 Innismir  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:26:36pm

re: #194 deseeded
Not this Masshole, bro.

Comrade!

Glad to see someone else with their head screwed on straight in this crazy state.

(Live in New Bedford, work in Boston)

430 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:26:53pm

re: #405 buzzsawmonkey

In 1965, President Kennedy had been dead for two years. He wasn't "curing" anything--least of all himself. And Robert Kennedy was kind of on the sidelines. Are you talking about the actor George Kennedy?

BUSTED BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

431 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:27:31pm

re: #424 gman

"My own assessment is that one side is to simplistic and the other to trusting with no middle ground for realpolitik (spit) which may unfortunately be called for in this case"

So, we're either simpletons or pushovers? Let me guess, you're right in the middle standing on the "Holy" ground.

No gman, you and others have already staked out that ground.

432 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:28:33pm

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

You're full of shit.

My heritage includes 8 nationalities and 3 races & I was born before Kennedy "fixed" that problem you speak of. Your self-contradictory argument is that racial prejudice still exists in the US, where it is regarded as a bad thing, therefore we should accept it as a good thing in Europe.

No thanks.

433 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:32:25pm

The Southern Poverty Law Center and Mr. Dees have done some good work against the Klan and Nazis.


But since he is running low on real enemies, and makes a living off it, he now targets landowners on the Mexican border who try to detain illegal aliens.


He is an uber-lib.

434 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:33:46pm

re: #421 wahabicorridor

re: #418 Steel Rain

just be glad I can't legally invite you to early morning coffee and pistols.

You can't? Hon, you need to move down here w/us in Virginia.

Now don't tease me, it's illegal there also:) Besides there weathers just getting decent here now in interior Alaska.

435 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:35:03pm

re: #52 ratherdashing

re: #31 storagemanager

I just hate to see the infighting. No blame is being laid on anyone. I'm not in a position to do that without reading the entire saga.

Calling it an infighting sorta downplays what really happened. It was an ATTACK on Charles started glaringly by atlas.

Charles only defended himself and started asking questions. Fjordman helped fuel the fire.

So yes, by root cause analysis, blame lays SQUARELY and SOLIDLY in pam's corner and then in fjordman's.

436 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:35:52pm

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

This post will stand as an example of why your account is no longer active.

437 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:37:21pm

re: #434 Steel Rain

re: #421 wahabicorridor


re: #418 Steel Rain

just be glad I can't legally invite you to early morning coffee and pistols.

You can't? Hon, you need to move down here w/us in Virginia.

Now don't tease me, it's illegal there also:) Besides there weathers just getting decent here now in interior Alaska.


Alaska? Oh, I'm sooo jealous! I've finally found wild Alaskan salmon. It's frozen, of course, but the farm raised stuff is not fit for compost. Still, to have it fresh - oh my goodness!

Altho' I'm told your mosquitoes have landing lights............

438 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:39:51pm

re: #436 Charles

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

This post will stand as an example of why your account is no longer active.


There goes that evil Charles Johnson, suppressing dissent again! Must be a liberal.................

heh.

439 Bubblehead II  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:40:06pm

re: #417 Elydo

re: #366 Bubblehead II

Heh heh. I don't know any submariners, to my misfortune. My grandfather was Royal Navy, but he was surface fleet. Survived both the Malta and Russian convoys, but died just before they were allowed to march in the Remembrance Day parade with their white berets. I was upset by that, and by how few survivors of those convoys there were left.

We can be an interesting group to be around, think it has to do with going to sea in a ship designed to sink and built by the lowest bidder :)

Sorry that your Grandfather didn't get to participate in a well deserved honor. The Merchant Marine and thier escorts really took it on the chin during the first part of the war, but they persevered and because of them we won. More should be done to honor these brave men and their service to their countries.

440 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:42:33pm

re: #430 WriterMom

re: #405 buzzsawmonkey
In 1965, President Kennedy had been dead for two years. He wasn't "curing" anything--least of all himself. And Robert Kennedy was kind of on the sidelines. Are you talking about the actor George Kennedy?
BUSTED BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

BTW, he's actually referring to Senator Ted Kennedy, who, in 1965, worked to "reform" US immigration policies and was this reform's biggest supporter. The claims by critics of what these "reforms" would do he famously denied at the time, but by any measure, proved to be absolutely true.

441 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:43:13pm

Assuming the house is on fire...

The nazi's aren't here to help fight the fire, they showed up with gasoline.

This shouldn't be all that surprising, as the nazi's helped to create this "problem" in the first place. And once again, the nazi's offer a "solution."

REPEAT,
R

442 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:43:14pm

re: #438 wahabicorridor

re: #436 Charles

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND

This post will stand as an example of why your account is no longer active.


There goes that evil Charles Johnson, suppressing dissent again! Must be a liberal.................

heh.

I haven't learned to embrace my inner racist, I guess.

443 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:43:15pm

Thanks Charles...pretty pukey stuff.

444 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:43:39pm

Perhaps Europeans would have a better future if they offered there people more than the bleak choice between a socialist nanny-state morphing into Islamist Sharia on the one hand, and white neo-nazi fascism on the other hand.

Perhaps it's my naive North American perspective, but I believe there are other, better options.

445 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:43:49pm

LOL. Yes-Charles you are SUCH a disappointment to white folks everywhere.

446 kuchuklambat  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:44:16pm

Not too inane, Steel Rain; I am glad we come to this inevitable point early enough in the game when we have a chance to hash it out.
Choice between Hitler and Stalin? On the face of it, wasn't a slam dunk back then; Stalin was more rational in a mafia boss kind of way, both just as evil. But do you think we would have won WWII without Russia? Or we would but with a lot more blood and privation?

As poster above pointed out, it matters just how bad it has got -- when it's bad enough we can put up with distasteful allies, as long as we manage them carefullly (more carefully than we did papa Joe).
So how bad is it and how strong are we without these allies?

Or do we labor under a delusion that we are invincible and can keep our hands and hearts clean this time?

High talk is cheap, Render.
My friends' dad was in german concentration camps, as a jewish teenage boy and missing a foot. They were taken on forced marches during the final days of war, moving away from advancing allies.
A camp guard was helping him hobble along (and refused to shoot him many times when the boy dropped on the ground and asked for death).
Would you have refused the guard's assistance under the conditions, Render? Or is "anytime, any reason" really "not until it's bad enough, and watchfully managed"?

447 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:44:23pm

re: #444 Kenneth

Ya think?

448 Ezekiel2517  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:44:32pm

The huge tell for me is all the sudden Ad Hominem attacks against Charles.

A kneejerk response when someone has lost an argument.

449 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:44:40pm

Let's do a little thought experiment. Let's imagine a fiction European country named Blegiland. Like most European countries Blegiland has a native birth rate of about .9. Blegilanders, alarmed at the influx of Turkish and other brown folks who come to work there, ban all immigration and launch a successful movement to make Blegiland white again.Blegiland who in 1960 had a population of 30 Million today has a population of 18 Million. Blegilanders continue to block immigration, and embrace Classic Blegiland culture. The young people of Blegiland flee as they state becomes less relevant and older, also their economy is stagnating as the job creation has slipped into negative numbers. In the year 2050, we have a few hundred thousand very white very old Blegilanders left.
But they are pure!

NOt a failry tale, but a logical projection

450 threecoloursblue  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:47:26pm

re: #444 Kenneth

Personally, I live in a capitalist democracy. And the EU's funding for peripheral nations/communities has helped to bring up the minority (small) nations to the level of the larger ones, like here in Ireland

451 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:47:30pm

re: #445 WriterMom

a disappointment to white folks everywhere.


Rotating title nomination.

452 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:49:08pm
453 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:49:21pm

re: #449 billhedrick

Let's do a little thought experiment. Let's imagine a fiction European country named Blegiland. Like most European countries Blegiland has a native birth rate of about .9. Blegilanders, alarmed at the influx of Turkish and other brown folks who come to work there, ban all immigration and launch a successful movement to make Blegiland white again. Blegiland who in 1960 had a population of 30 Million today has a population of 18 Million. Blegilanders continue to block immigration, and embrace Classic Blegiland culture. The young people of Blegiland flee as they state becomes less relevant and older, also their economy is stagnating as the job creation has slipped into negative numbers. In the year 2050, we have a few hundred thousand very white very old Blegilanders left.

But they are pure!

NOt a failry tale, but a logical projection

The big chapter you left out is what the Blegis had to actually do in order to reduce the population by almost half.

454 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:51:05pm

re: #446 kuchuklambat

Perhaps my "high talk" might have something to do with the missing European branch of my family tree?

===

I accept individual atonement. I do not and will never accept nazi's as "allies." Not now, not ever.

DIFFICULT
CONCEPT?,
R

455 dead sea squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:52:24pm

re: #448 Ezekiel2517

The huge tell for me is all the sudden Ad Hominem attacks against Charles.

A kneejerk response when someone has lost an argument.

Dead on the money. Psychoanalyzing Charles and making patently false claims that his objections have "already been answered" at link X.

The squealing of guilty consciences.

456 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:54:10pm

re: #405 buzzsawmonkey

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND


I would imagine he supports it. Just like a lot of American politicians have supported it in the past. This hallucination that many of you seem to operate under that the United States was filled with colorful people in this big grand melting pot is a bunch of bullshit. It was never so...at least it wasn't so until Kennedy made it so in 1965. The percentages of "colorful" people in the US was minuscule until just recently. We were what you apparently hate until Kennedy "cured" us.

In 1965, President Kennedy had been dead for two years. He wasn't "curing" anything--least of all himself. And Robert Kennedy was kind of on the sidelines. Are you talking about the actor George Kennedy?

Melting pot was a Jewish contribution to the discussion. It was apparently first used by Rabbi Samuel Schulman, who spoke of America as "the melting pot of nationalities" in a 1907 Passover sermon at his New York temple.

Melting pot of nationalities....because it was assumed that most of the immigrants would be coming from Europe. No one dreamed that anyone might think we could "melt" into our nation everyone in the world. Why do we force the Europeans to do so?

Here's a hot tip; whether "melting pot" was a "Jewish contribution to the discussion" or not, it has been used by many, many people--Gentile as well as Jew--in the hundred years since 1907.

"Melting pot" said nothing about where the immigrants would be coming from; merely that whereever they came from, they would merge into American nationals--whether from Norther Europe, Southern Europe, Eastern Europe, or from China, Japan, the Indian subcontinent, the Philippines, Micronesia, and South and Central America.

It's not about where they came from, but what they came for--and whether they were willing to become Americans.

Not to defend the now banned and somewhat overtly racist Pierre LaGrande, but Ted Kennedy wrote the immigration law, as a junior Senator, I believe before he had ever killed anyone while drunk, that shifted immigration preferences away from the educated to the non-educated. I don't know all the details, nor do I have time to look now.


I may be lilly white, but I had the good sense to have children that are also part Mexican and Apache Indian.

457 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:56:32pm

re: #450 threecoloursblue

re: #444 Kenneth

Personally, I live in a capitalist democracy. And the EU's funding for peripheral nations/communities has helped to bring up the minority (small) nations to the level of the larger ones, like here in Ireland

Well, let me ask you a question - I'm not being facetious, I really don't have an answer. Do you think it can last, especially given the enlargement? You're going to be giving a lot of money to Romania, Slovenia, etc., who are a lot farther behind than Ireland ever was.

I don't even want to THINK what Turkey would cost...........

458 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:57:48pm

A sample comment from Gates of Vienna......


Charles was raised a catholic.

The Koran was inspired by a Catholic num who married Muhammad. Notice how similar they are: the black shawls, etc.

Abraham Lincoln warned and knew that he would be assassinated by Jesuits.
.....
The Catholics supported Hitler. Catholicism is fascist and repressive, just like its doppelganger, Islam.

It is obvious that sites like lgf and freerepubic.com are shills for the military industrial complex.

Wow.

459 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:58:17pm

re: #447 WriterMom

I'm just puzzled as to which parts of me I would have to deport to where if Fjordman's immigration policy were applied here...

460 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 12:59:49pm

In 1965, there was a major reform of immigration policy from "national quotas" to one based on "family reunification". Ted Kennedy was the Senate "floor manager" for the Bill and had this response to critics:

“First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia....

“In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

Further reforms in 1986 only exacerbated the problems and inequities of the 1965 Act. Mexico unloading its poorest 10% onto the US welfare system is a direct result of Teddy's efforts 42 years ago.

Milton Friedman wisely noted: "You cannot have both open borders and a welfare state."

461 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:00:19pm

re: #286 ContraJihadi

What I don't understand, however, is why the likes of Baron Bodissey and Pamela Geller are siding with Fjordman against Charles's criticisms.

They have a vested interest. Notice that the support these people are getting is from each other- attendees of the conference- and their friends (miniter, etc.). Do they have any independent defenders?

462 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:00:35pm

re: #433 Ed Mahmoud's Sock Puppet

The Southern Poverty Law Center and Mr. Dees have done some good work against the Klan and Nazis.


But since he is running low on real enemies, and makes a living off it, he now targets landowners on the Mexican border who try to detain illegal aliens.


He is an uber-lib.

Why not target the financiers of hate literature in mosques? Why won't he do that?

463 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:01:00pm

re: #457 wahabicorridor


Actually, I think including Romania and other former Communist countries is a good idea. They hate the socialist bureaucracy of the EU. But if they let Turkey in, it's game over. The Islamists will have won.

464 Spiny Norman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:01:26pm

re: #452 buzzsawmonkey

re: #440 Spiny Norman

I forgot about Senator Ted. Thanks for the update.

I don't recollect what immigration reforms were enacted then, however; could you elaborate?

Oops. My #460 was a response to buzzsawmonkey's #452.

465 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:02:38pm

re: #458 Killgore Trout

The Koran was inspired by a Catholic num who married Muhammad

Catholic nuns married? Who knew?

466 Radical Rafe  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:03:04pm

re: #2 Shug

Oooooooh, Shug, you done messed up now.

You done gone and vilified my all-time favorite pugilistic practitioner.

Writing a book about him now, actually......

Somebody musta bit Fjordman on the ear.

467 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:04:38pm

re: #463 Kenneth

They hate the socialist bureaucracy of the EU.

Given the socialist bureaucracy they recently just got out off, I think they prefer the one they've got. Nobody put a gun to their head to join.

468 Bearster  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:05:07pm

re: #450 threecoloursblue
Personally, I live in a capitalist democracy. And the EU's funding for peripheral nations/communities has helped to bring up the minority (small) nations to the level of the larger ones, like here in Ireland

Actually, Ireland's success is in spite of--not because of--any handouts it may have received from the EU. And it is in spite of--and not because of--any taxes it is obliged to pay to other countries.

Welfare handouts don't help the handee or the hander.

469 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:05:20pm

re: #465 wahabicorridor

re: #458 Killgore Trout


The Koran was inspired by a Catholic num who married Muhammad

Catholic nuns married? Who knew?

Read the quote carefully, that's a "Catholic num"... whatever that is. I wonder if she seduced ol' Mo with her muster gas?

470 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:05:21pm

re: #465 wahabicorridor


Catholic nuns married? Who knew?


Maybe the rules are different for "nums"

471 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:09:31pm

re: #467 wahabicorridor

The gun to their heads was the one they were used to seeing: a Russian gun. For the same reason Poland, Romania, Latvia & etc are all eager to join NATO, to keep the Russian military out, they are eager to join the EU to keep the Russian economic bloc out. Who would you rather have as trading partners: Germany and the UK or Belorus and Russia?

472 Dead Sea Squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:11:45pm

As if this whole thing weren't surreal enough, there's a long comment at GoV attacking Fjordman and implicitly defending Charles from The Poster Formerly Known as Gordon, but the basis of the attack, as usual, is that the Islamic threat to Europe is exaggerated, even in Sweden.

Another questionable "ally" we can do without.

473 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:14:00pm

Pat Condell uncorks a hell of a rant:

The British atheist takes a slap at Catholicism in it, so don't say I didn't warn you. But he also has some choice words for white supremacists trying to latch on to his videos.

474 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:14:43pm

The first post of fjordman's that made me begin questioning his take on things started with this one in regards to him writing about LA.

I found his portrayal of LA's issues to be alarmist (not to say that LA doesn't have issues but I thought he went overboard) and questionable and some other comments he made just didn't sit well with my gut.

And to American readers: This is one of the reasons why I haven't left Europe for the USA yet. First of all because I think it's too early to say that Europe is lost, and second, because I am rather worried by the trends I see in the US, and wonder whether I would just be leaving one sinking ship in favor of another sinking ship.


.
.

The United States may well have signed its own death warrant as a country when it decided to be a "universal" nation. There is no such thing.


.
.

However, I am pretty sure that an entity recognizable as China will still exist in the second half of this century. I cannot say that with equal confidence about the USA. You are much less ethnically homogeneous than China, and risk clinging on to this near-religious idea that all cultures are equally compatible with US dynamism and that all the religious, ethnic, cultural and racial tensions that plague the rest of mankind will somehow magically disappear the second immigrants set foot on US soil.


.
.

A bloody conflict between Hispanic and black gangs is spreading across Los Angeles. Hundreds are dying as whole districts face the threat of ethnic cleansing.

Ever since that post, I have always viewed his essays with more skepticism than I normally would have.

475 neocon hippie  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:16:08pm

re: #458 Killgore Trout

A sample comment from Gates of Vienna......


Charles was raised a catholic.The Koran was inspired by a Catholic num who married Muhammad. Notice how similar they are: the black shawls, etc.

Abraham Lincoln warned and knew that he would be assassinated by Jesuits.
.....
The Catholics supported Hitler. Catholicism is fascist and repressive, just like its doppelganger, Islam.

It is obvious that sites like lgf and freerepubic.com are shills for the military industrial complex.

Wow.

Yikes! The nuts are really coming out now. I wonder how long GoV will allow that comment to remain.

476 thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:18:23pm

argh. It's terrible being stuck at work and only able to dip in here on occasion.

It's a grand dispute, but the as the left has it's nutroots, so too does the right. The problem with the right's "wingnuts" is that they are attempting to coat-tail and appear mainstream conservative. They aren't - demonstration of that is the civil rights act. More Republicans voted for it than Democrats, and never forget that.

477 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:18:34pm
The big chapter you left out is what the Blegis had to actually do in order to reduce the population by almost half.

Well I wasn't thinking so sinisterly, just that with a replacement rate of less than 50%, you'll loose about that many people in 40 years.

478 A Kiwi Infidel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:19:00pm

Have come in very, very late on this, and correct me if someone else has already picked this up, but I picked this up straight away.....

"The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate "

He may as well have used the term "illegal zionist regime"

479 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:19:04pm

re: #431 Steel Rain

re: #424 gman


"My own assessment is that one side is to simplistic and the other to trusting with no middle ground for realpolitik (spit) which may unfortunately be called for in this case"

So, we're either simpletons or pushovers? Let me guess, you're right in the middle standing on the "Holy" ground.


No gman, you and others have already staked out that ground.


I would love to know more about this "realpolitik." Me thinks it has to do with accepting shady friends. I thought Charles made it pretty clear
that LGF was not going to do that.

480 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:21:07pm
481 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:22:25pm

re: #473 Charles

Excellent! He's told the White supremacists to piss off a few times before. I guess they need frequent reminders.

482 Elydo  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:22:32pm

re: #473 Charles

[laughing my ass off] AHAHAHAHA, good to more and more brits coming from the woodwork to illustrate just how pissed off most of us are.

483 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:23:46pm

re: #475 neocon hippie

Yikes! The nuts are really coming out now.

I can't even take that comment seriously. I'm assuming that anyone who actually thinks that would be institutionalized somewhere.

484 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:24:47pm

re: #446 kuchuklambat

Not too inane, Steel Rain; I am glad we come to this inevitable point early enough in the game when we have a chance to hash it out.
Choice between Hitler and Stalin? On the face of it, wasn't a slam dunk back then; Stalin was more rational in a mafia boss kind of way, both just as evil. But do you think we would have won WWII without Russia? Or we would but with a lot more blood and privation?

As poster above pointed out, it matters just how bad it has got -- when it's bad enough we can put up with distasteful allies, as long as we manage them carefullly (more carefully than we did papa Joe).
So how bad is it and how strong are we without these allies?

Or do we labor under a delusion that we are invincible and can keep our hands and hearts clean this time?
?

It's mostly inane in the aspect of extreme sides being taken here and at GoV. You're reasoning parallels my own attempted prospective. Don't get me wrong, I detest realpolitik. I also realize that sometimes all you have left is realpolitik. When that's the only option left then so be it, but the ones doing it best do it well and not make the death and misery of those expended in the exercise come to naught.

I asked the question earlier, what anti-jihad groups in Europe would pass the "purity" muster that many here are imposing? Seriously is there any? I alluded to the convoluted interconnections of the various cliques (for lack of a better word) and I'm stumped for finding any. I will point out again that if you dig around in the US you'll find even our cherished groups would have trouble passing muster. This whole thing is complicated due to the simple fact that humans are involved and there ain't no human out there that doesn't have his/her own little agenda.

As I see it we're left with three options. Ignore it and hope they find their way somehow to a solution we can stomach. Reach out to the better ones and encourage them to get their house in order. Wait till it goes to drek and nuke em from orbit as the only way of being sure.

It's not a forgone fact that things are destined to go to hell there. It is an acknowledgeable possibility though and it worries me since several blood kin never came back from there last century due to the fun and games (both times). I don't want to see my grand children repeat the exercise, there's not that many of our family name left these days. I've seen some of the scenarios, I'm sure they've been heavily modified over the years but I'm also sure they're still potentially valid.

485 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:25:25pm

re: #453 Charles

re: #449 billhedrick

Let's do a little thought experiment. Let's imagine a fiction European country named Blegiland. Like most European countries Blegiland has a native birth rate of about .9. Blegilanders, alarmed at the influx of Turkish and other brown folks who come to work there, ban all immigration and launch a successful movement to make Blegiland white again. Blegiland who in 1960 had a population of 30 Million today has a population of 18 Million. Blegilanders continue to block immigration, and embrace Classic Blegiland culture. The young people of Blegiland flee as they state becomes less relevant and older, also their economy is stagnating as the job creation has slipped into negative numbers. In the year 2050, we have a few hundred thousand very white very old Blegilanders left.

But they are pure!

NOt a failry tale, but a logical projection

The big chapter you left out is what the Blegis had to actually do in order to reduce the population by almost half.

May I? Blegilanders tended to be very sloppy when it comes to wholesale slaughter. The Germans were noted for their machine-like efficiency in this area, but the Blegilanders were more like the Hutus of Rwanda during the 1994 attempted genocide of the Tutsis. In the past, the successive leftist leaning governments banned all firearms, so all the Blegilanders had were crowbars, knives, axes, shovels, machetes, and an animal-like brutality that would even have made the Germans cringe. The Blegilanders soon got rid of all the Turks in their country. Yes, ALL the Turks. Blood ran for days in the streets of Sprussels. Once they got rid of the Turks, they set their sights on the Jews of Scantwerp. This took the small orthodox Jewish community by surprise since the dominant party, Yaams Clok, were staunchly pro-Israel. Sadly, the small Jewish community didn't heed the advice of Ariel Sharon and other Israeli leaders when they said Europe was going to hell. Instead, they took the advice of mostly uninformed bloggers from America desperate to find allies in Europe, and backed Yaams Clok in its rise to power. Unbeknown to the beleagered Jews of Scantwerp, Yaams Clok had not given up on their past fascist tendencies. One American blogger even said "Would Nazis have a kosher dinner with Jews?". The rest, of course, is history. And Blegiland has suffered because of it.

Certainly not a fairytale, but a projection.

486 thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:26:54pm

re: #473 Charles

Pat Condell uncorks a hell of a rant:

[Link: www.liveleak.com...]

The British atheist takes a slap at Catholicism in it, so don't say I didn't warn you. But he also has some choice words for white supremacists trying to latch on to his videos.


Wow, that deserves a thread. (with a warning for Catholics... )

487 jimmah  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:27:28pm

re: #473 Charles

Pat Condell uncorks a hell of a rant:

[Link: www.liveleak.com...]

The British atheist takes a slap at Catholicism in it, so don't say I didn't warn you. But he also has some choice words for white supremacists trying to latch on to his videos.

Thanks Charles! I've been looking for that clip for weeks.

488 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:28:03pm

re: #478 A Kiwi Infidel

Have come in very, very late on this, and correct me if someone else has already picked this up, but I picked this up straight away.....

"The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate "

He may as well have used the term "illegal zionist regime"

Others did pick it up above and construed it to mean Fjordman was blaming the Jews for the loss of European identity.

I disputed that. Talking to Europeans over the years in order to try to understand the EU, I found that EU supporters who cite nationalism as justification, because they blame 'nationalism' for the evils of the 20th century, and use the Holocaust as an example.

The 'backstory' to this portion of Fjordman's remarks is that the EU abolishes the nation-state, which he - and many others - object to.

489 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:29:00pm

re: #52 ratherdashing

re: #31 storagemanager

I just hate to see the infighting. No blame is being laid on anyone. I'm not in a position to do that without reading the entire saga.

About splits and infighting, the New Testament (though talking about splits within the Church) says "For there must also be factions among you, in order that those who are approved may have become evident among you."(ICor11:19), and the same is true here, positions are being made "evident," or clarified, and that is a helpful thing, as uncomfortable as it is. Only 70 years ago most German professing Christians went along with Hitler, openly or by "staying out of it" or appealing to pragmatism, becoming part of the Reich Church, a very few resisted, Bonhoeffer and Neimoller come to mind.

Bonhoeffer (who was hanged, btw) said, "If Evil appears in the form of light, benefit, loyalty and renewal, if it conforms with historical necessity and social justice, then this, if it is understood straightforwardly, is a clear proof of its abysmal wickedness."

490 marwan's daughter  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:29:40pm

re: #477 billhedrick

See post 485. Feeling verrry dark and sinister right now :)

491 Killgore Trout  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:29:55pm

re: #486 thanos

Those rants of his aren't scripted either. He's not reading a preprepared speech. Damn I wish I could express myself that well.

492 R2D2  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:30:14pm

Nasty turn of events.
It saddens me greatly.
Jihadis are laughing.

493 abefromen  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:31:21pm

like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives.

i swear, there is something i find really funny about this particular "Blog Soap Opera" between LGF and TBJ.

I wonder who's father's brother is going to sleep with who's sisters nephew next...

Stay Tuned!

494 WriterMom  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:32:14pm

re: #473 Charles

HOLY...I'M IN LOVE.

Charles-post this as a thread...he's awesome!

495 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:32:47pm
496 thanos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:32:56pm

re: #491 Killgore Trout

re: #486 thanos

Those rants of his aren't scripted either. He's not reading a preprepared speech. Damn I wish I could express myself that well.

Much more effective and to the point than a five page cryptic anti-jihadi screed carefully crafted to support identity. This is an ally we need.

497 dmjung  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:36:14pm

re: #391 Bearster
I think your analogy is flawed. I think it is not a matter of how much "impurity" that one is willing to work with in order to help achive one's goals. I think the issue is that working with evil works against one's goals.

All analogies are flawed. :) My observation is that the definition of what is evil (i.e. "the line" that a person will not cross) appears to be subjective or at least the serious of the evil is being viewed with highly different values. Eg., Patton appeared more than willing to rearm the Nazis to assist in confronting the Soviets. (Maybe apocryphal.)

What really struck me was that many in the LGF community feel that Giuliani should be supported even though his social preferences are viewed by some as not much different than Nazi-ish or at least equally evil in their view.

(In case anyone is wondering, I think allying with a racist oriented organization with overlapping goals is a bad thing. OTOH, on the field of battle I'm more than willing to let my two enemies attack each other while I watch.)

498 J.S.  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:36:58pm

Some of these comments (from GoV, etc.) -- I mean, really...(perhaps the only value would be to re-work them in the form of gags..) You can't even respond to them -- it would be to give them credence...

Another thing which I'm finding tedious is that you can explain "Facts X" over and over and over again, and it just falls on deaf ears. For example, the Stalin business (a poster asks about Roosevelt and Stalin -- as if Roosevelt "hated" Stalin, yet formed a pact. Well for the gazillionth time -- NO. This did NOT happen. Roosevelt LIKED Stalin -- the two were pals, buddies. Stalin's horrors as dictator were NOT known -- Until AFTER the END of WWII. I have repeatedly mentioned this -- so have others. Yet, I expect someone else will once again bring up some imaginary claims about forming alliances with "the devil." Again, the one who never liked Stalin was CHURCHILL -- and for a complicated set of reasons..) Then, about the Odin white supremacist cross -- again, for the gazillionth time -- it is because in Europe the nazi swastika has been banned -- you can't display a swastika without being arrested. Hence, the white power advocates had to get a different symbol. And, never mind the IQ debates -- might as well be talking to a post. And, it's the same with the fjordman -- none of the concerns about the associations with White Supremacists and European political parties is adequately addressed. Fjordman simply cavalierly dismisses it as something not really worthy of a response (other than some lame "it's not helpful" to align with neo-nazis or Le Pen.) Then, Fjordman returns to his hobby-horse -- "We have no choice! We have no other alternative! Our arms are being twisted! The brown people are invading and attacking us! They are raping our vemen! We have to ethnically cleanse our nations to preserve our Whiteness. Ja!" That's the "argument." Feh...how pathetic...

499 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:37:05pm

re: #484 Steel Rain

I asked the question earlier, what anti-jihad groups in Europe would pass the "purity" muster that many here are imposing? Seriously is there any?

Fjordman makes that very case. The 'there is no place else to go'. No one here disputes that, but we view it as a false choice. MAKE SOME OTHER PLACE TO GO. He claims it is, for all practical purposes, impossible. He lives there, I don't. He may be right. In that case, they should just lose the racial supremists.

There is one point - and I've said this many times - that Americans don't get about Europeans - and that is the 'race=culture' meme is in their bones. They don't think they're racists - they think they are 'culturists'. And that may be WHY telling them to 'lose' the racial supremists doesn't compute - they look around and say 'Where?'

500 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:39:38pm

re: #473 Charles

That was awesome. He really has a knack.

But his stance on the white supremacists- he must not have a clue about european politics, huh?

/fjordman mode off

501 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:42:05pm

re: #494 WriterMom

HOLY...I'M IN LOVE.

Yeah, well, I'm in love with buzzsawmonkey

In the meantime, I guess we'll just have to watch the episode where you go and f*ck yourself.

LMAO!

502 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:47:04pm

re: #479 gman


No gman, you and others have already staked out that ground.


I would love to know more about this "realpolitik." Me thinks it has to do with accepting shady friends. I thought Charles made it pretty clear
that LGF was not going to do that.

Make up your own mind gman. It's not mine or anyone else's place to do so for you. Realpolitik is a method for dealing with a situation when there's no honorable method available. You're not forced to use it but sometimes it's the only course available if you want to commit to action. I asked the question what anti-jihad group in Europe passes the purity muster? I don't see any that meets the standards expressed by most here. So then it's either ignore it or use realpolitik. Your choice. Your decision. Not mine.

Evaluate and come to a decision, then live with it as your "own" decision, not some one else's, not some political party's, not some blog's.

503 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:48:07pm

Where does the misconception that we "don't like Europeans" come from?

What makes "them" think that they are the only Europeans we know?

REFILL,
R

504 nikis-knight  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:49:17pm

re: #302 realwest

Hey y'all - just got back from doing some chores and have to leave shortly to do more.
I've been trying to read the thread down and have found that most if not all the minus dings on posts which support Charles and LGF are from a poster who's nic is Saywhat?
Saywhat?, since you're obviously out there somewhere, instead of just knocking other peoples opinions, how about posting your own opinions and views.


I didn't know it showed who rated what. Cool! (I'm probably one of the few raters; I'm happy to stand by my opinions but I don't wanna waste space with me too posts.)

505 Josephine  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:49:39pm

re: #458 Killgore Trout

And you left out some of the creepier bits. Wow is right.

506 Kenneth  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:51:19pm

re: #485 marwan's daughter

Perfect. Brilliant.

507 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:56:37pm

re: #214 nolocon

Speaking of "guilt by association," I take exception to Fjordman's innuendo that I as an LGF reader support Albanian independence, just because I preferred Bush over Kerry.

508 J.S.  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:57:34pm

re: #503 Render

Where does the misconception that we "don't like Europeans" come from?

What makes "them" think that they are the only Europeans we know?

REFILL,
R

I figure it's all a part of their act...their whine..."You don't like us" (gotta get out that violin...and the sob towels.) Actually, a lot of this reminds me of what one reads from certain Muslims -- "we're bein' discriminated against; wahhhh, you don't like us; but we'll get even, yeah, you just wait and see!" [followed by threats] etc. Pretty infantile imo...

509 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:59:12pm

re: #502 Steel Rain

re: #479 gman


No gman, you and others have already staked out that ground.


I would love to know more about this "realpolitik." Me thinks it has to do with accepting shady friends. I thought Charles made it pretty clear
that LGF was not going to do that.

Make up your own mind gman. It's not mine or anyone else's place to do so for you. Realpolitik is a method for dealing with a situation when there's no honorable method available. You're not forced to use it but sometimes it's the only course available if you want to commit to action. I asked the question what anti-jihad group in Europe passes the purity muster? I don't see any that meets the standards expressed by most here. So then it's either ignore it or use realpolitik. Your choice. Your decision. Not mine.

Evaluate and come to a decision, then live with it as your "own" decision, not some one else's, not some political party's, not some blog's.

Like I said before, sounds like you like those shady creatures of the night. That was from me, my own mind.

510 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 1:59:16pm

#485 marwan's daughter
Oh my... Yup that's brilliant, I almost weep for my poor Blegis.

511 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:04:13pm

re: #499 wahabicorridor

re: #484 Steel Rain

I asked the question earlier, what anti-jihad groups in Europe would pass the "purity" muster that many here are imposing? Seriously is there any?

Fjordman makes that very case. The 'there is no place else to go'. No one here disputes that, but we view it as a false choice. MAKE SOME OTHER PLACE TO GO. He claims it is, for all practical purposes, impossible. He lives there, I don't. He may be right. In that case, they should just lose the racial supremists.

There is one point - and I've said this many times - that Americans don't get about Europeans - and that is the 'race=culture' meme is in their bones. They don't think they're racists - they think they are 'culturists'. And that may be WHY telling them to 'lose' the racial supremists doesn't compute - they look around and say 'Where?'

Good point. Trust me, after my last stint in Europe (a couple of decades ago) I agree fully. I had good hearing back then and enough german language ability to catch some of the prosaic comments about my Korean wife. Just to be fair I don't rank the British, Danish, French or Norwiegians any better. The eastern Euro's I met though were a bit of a saving grace. Perhaps they're just as bad but I didn't see evidence of it.

I don't know if outreach to any of the less unsavory groups is worth the effort. I wouldn't close off channels until it was determined. I sorta whimsically consider the nuke from orbit option as best but then I'm an unforgiving man.

512 ornery elephant  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:06:22pm

NOTE: WPB refers to The Worker's Party of Belgium a.k.a. The Communist Party of Belgium.

Ten reasons can be given why people may have voted for WPB+ candidates

1. A credible and realistic programme – e.g. a campaign for cheaper medicines that received 100,000 signatures and led to concrete price-lowering measures by the Ministry of Health

2. Going all the way in confronting particular issues, and doing this by listening to and working with the people – e.g. obtaining the elimination of an unjust tax on households

3. All-out action against increasingly expensive living conditions – e.g. fighting for cheaper electricity for households

4. Fighting for better health – e.g. by preventing public hospitals from being privatised; e.g. by defending the workers’ health against unsafe and unhealth working conditions

5. Concern for the environment – e.g. against the air and ground pollution caused by major companies

6. Blocking the extreme Rightist ‘Vlaams Belang’

7. Unity and solidarity, across language divides – The WPB is the only remaining national Belgian party, without being divided in a Flemish and French-speaking party.

8. A genuine workers’ party – Among the WPB+ candidates, you will find a lot of workers and trade unionists. WPB members are very active in the trade union movement, and supported the trade unions’ struggle against the government measures to keep older workers longer years at work, while maintaining a high level of unemployment among the youth.

9. Candidates ‘with and for the people’ – instead of candidates ‘with and for money’

10. Small is no longer beautiful – The WPB has long been considered ‘the biggest party of the small ones’. Now it aims to become ‘the smallest party of the big ones’ and to be taken into account as a serious force for societal change.

Workers’ Party of Belgium

Interesting bedfellows in the fight against Vlaams Belang

513 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:09:53pm

re: #509 gman

Like I said before, sounds like you like those shady creatures of the night. That was from me, my own mind.

And it sounds like you want to pick a fight. So I like white supremacists? With that insinuation you're the only creature of the night I see around these parts. Go bother someone else.

514 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:10:09pm

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND


This hallucination that many of you seem to operate under that the United States was filled with colorful people in this big grand melting pot is a bunch of bullshit.

Negging this post down of Pierre's just didn't seem to do it justice without also posting to say how deplorable this is towards non whites. He's been cruising for a bruising for awhile..Charles is a saint to have put up with him giving him a chance to redeem himself.

Skin color has NOTHING to do with the issues. People can't choose it. How hard is it for white nationalists to understand? It's simple, they don't wish to understand. Taking a trip to the pathetic American white nazi group's homepage sent shivers down my spine when I read the WHO WE ARE page.....

You know, I look white but I just may be a mongrel, I never bothered yet to really look into my past family tree..but I'm always embarrassed by people who put down skin color. There just is no rational basis to act this way. All skin colors I think are actually beautiful and I take pride in the fact that most people DO melt together here in the USA. If anything I take issue with individuals who utterly refuse to follow our laws, attempt to learn our language, flip Americans the bird while living in America....they are ALL different skin colors too I notice that do this stuff which makes it even MORE important that we adhere to laws and not allow special groups any type of special status to their own way of justice. We (USA) need to just maintain and fight for what our forefathers spent blood for...US Constitution.

515 Yank in the EU  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:12:31pm

I take the view that LGF has shined a much needed light on a very important topic for the anti-jihad cause in Europe. To mention one strategic point, it would be a dire mistake to turn to the racial nationalists in a spasm of panic and fear, since the majority in the center will not fight for that and many will in fact fight against it.

Let's not make the errant assumption that the European population is as as sympathetic to the ethnic populist rhetoric as it was in the 1930's. I know, e.g., a Fleming in the military who is my age (30 -- I live in Flanders and get by in Dutch) and who intends to fight the jihad in a righteous manner, yet he rejects the idea of uniting in the fight under the banner of a "white Europe." It is simply disgusting to too many people for it to work. The underlying issue of whether white nationalism is a friend or enemy to the cause has been one of the revealing problems to come out of the controversy, given that many of us were active supporters of the Brussels Journal, et al. The latter recently put articles endorsing the BNP and defending political ideology based on racial differences on its front page (cf. article about Schroedinger's Cat). Fjordman, Brussels Journal, Gates of Vienna and others in no uncertain terms defend the ideology, often in detail on recent LGF threads. Thus, the controversy brought forth a moment of vision, a demand for caution and wisdom, and also a degree of understanding on an issue that is a complex mess.

Of course, the pressing question remains: what can Europe do then? What if only the VB will fight Islamization? The anti-jihad movement, in order to succeed, must be taken up by those with a much stronger set of ideas than 'Blood and Soil' crap, ideas that are just and proudly defendable in the light of day. That is the task we face as well in America, though not at all with similar urgency. The key point is that the anti-jihad cause would be harmed by having Dewinter and the Vlaams Belang in its ranks, with its leadership that has demonstrable sympathy for certain Nazis and has formed an alliance with other, more openly racist groups like the FN and the BNP, which seek international legitimacy via the figures of the A-J mov't. The path to fighting the jihad in Europe will not be easy, but turning to the 'Blood and Soil' element will not succeed. As I mentioned, what is needed is a legitimate movement that people can discuss without a sense that they are returning to a real evil or are reducing mankind to crude, physiological, determined traits. I can't say what the mainstream right must do to find its spine, but it must take place. The citizenry must wake up. The liberals (center-right, of course) could take the steam out of the far-right by taking care of the flood of immigration and similar areas where the VB have a point.

The defenses of a racial conception of culture and the nation that ensue from Charles' reasonable and well-evidenced concerns (that I know no one really doubts, except for the few who deceive themselves willingly or don't care to read both sides), thus teach important lessons. To this day, we observe a silence to the evidence that LGF presented; what responses there are distort and obfuscate what the evidence is and what the original claims were. They also respond not to the basic issue but with attacks, often directed against LGF's owner as a person. Belien has talked about our whole side's "intellectual incapacity" to understand the VB's position. Hence, it is obvious that LGF in no way introduced the personal vitriol, as we also see in spades at this GoV post.

Lastly, there are many who have taken the plunge into supporting the VB against the jihad on the "Stalin was our ally" meme. But there are a fatal flaws in this position, relating not merely the ethics of befriending and legitimizing white nationalists, viz. the points about ruining the cause and the about not having enough support. These groups are not "het enige alternatief," which is what they always insist we believe.

516 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:12:50pm

re: #358 wahabicorridor

re: #352 PIERRE_LEGRAND

This seems less wise than working from inside the groups to moderate the tempers of the more imflammatory

Gee, why didn't the Southern Poverty Law Center think of that before they sued the KKK?

You mean like some of us Christians who also have attempted to confront the white supremacist Christian Identity movement head on (instead of merely reporting or exposing them), something that didn't go over so well here: "Pastor" w/9mm

517 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:12:58pm

#470 Killgore Trout 11/14/07 1:05:21 pm reply quote report 2

re: #465 wahabicorridor

Catholic nuns married? Who knew?

Maybe the rules are different for "nums"


Are skulls involved? re: #470 Killgore Trout

518 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:13:27pm

#512 ornery elephant

Interesting bedfellows in the fight against Vlaams Belang


Ahhhh guilt by association? nope doesn't work that way. Not all Vegetarians are Hitler my friend. Having a common foe doesn't make you allies.

519 totally berserk  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:14:23pm

I have been quite baffled by this rift, never understood why they were talking trash about Charles! Now it's starting to make sense. Wow.

Awful. Had no idea. But I am forced to confess a similar tendency to want to brush the racist stuff aside for now in order to have more allies. I mean, we had to work with Stalin in WWII. Is this any less important?

I'd still rather fight it out with skinheads later than lose to the Islamofascists sooner. Tough call though. Absolutely. I am most emphatically NOT criticizing anyone for having higher ideals than mine!

Which Charles does, no contest.

520 debutaunt  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:16:16pm

re: #473 Charles
#473 Charles 11/14/07 1:14:00 pm reply quote report 2

Pat Condell uncorks a hell of a rant:

[Link: [Link: www.liveleak.com...]...]

The British atheist takes a slap at Catholicism in it, so don't say I didn't warn you. But he also has some choice words for white supremacists trying to latch on to his videos.


"How inclusive!" HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAA

521 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:16:28pm

re: #512 ornery elephant

Surely you aren't referring to Charles' stance as being bedfellows with that party because they hold that same view on vb?

Just curious if I read that wrong.


Bedfellows = One that is closely associated or allied with another

522 infidelesto  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:16:40pm

re: #154 Owl

I agree owl, and I read comment #110 and I agree with Charles as well.

You're right we should not align ourselves with those who claim to be on our side but really aren't. When it comes to fighting Jihad, sure we may be in agreement with them, but we can't align ourselves with them if they are participating and supporting Nazi hate groups and holocaust deniers.

What's really a shame is the attention this all takes away from the anti-jihad movement itself. When Charles was interviewed the other dauy one of the questions he specifically asked was about the split or divide of the anti-jihad movement over this issue. Charles stated that he thought it was pretty serious, and I totally agree.

Splitting up with Nazi lovers was inevitable. Glad it happened now and not later when the leftists try to latch on and use it against us. Hopefully, now we can turn our focus back to the main issues of the day.

You did the right thing, Charles...

523 nikis-knight  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:16:48pm

re: #330 kuchuklambat

Allright, people, making allies with Stalin's Soviet Union against fascist Axis -- good idea or bad?
Toning down US anti-Soviet media during the war -- good idea to a degree? or all bad?

This is what we are talkin about, isn't it? Distasteful (or worse) allies, whether to make them, how to manage the alliance if we do make it, etc?

This is a battle of public opinion; we don't need nazi soldier to attack on two fronts. We have the military strength, we only need to convince people to have the will to act. Nazi ties will only undermine our pro-freedom position.

524 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:18:47pm

re: #519 totally berserk

I'd still rather fight it out with skinheads later than lose to the Islamofascists sooner. Tough call though.

It's not a tough call for those that were and will be persecuted under skinheads after the islamo's get their butts kicked.

I don't want any skinheads in my trench. A poster named truumax said it best for me, the skinheads will be in my crosshairs along with the islamofascists.

525 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:20:10pm

If they have separated themselves from BNP...

Then why is Pamela cut-&-pasting BNP articles on her blog?

NO
PRISONERS,
R

526 Mr Krabs  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:21:27pm

Funny how the white honkies in Europe who don't want their heads on the chopping block are told to stay quiet and cop it.
Until there is one way immigration into Asia/Africa/Middle East you guys should shut your sanctimonious pieholes.

527 ornery elephant  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:22:17pm

re: #521 Highrise

Of course I wasn't making that assertion Highrise.

I was just searching Belgian political parties to see their stances on various issues - I was simply trying to find a Belgian party that supports the fight against jihad.

i posted that simply because of the vague points made throughout their list there except for the one on Vlaams which is very specific.

The term "bedfellows" referred to the political parties in Belgium that oppose Vlaams.

528 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:31:12pm

re: #515 Yank in the EU

The latter recently put articles endorsing the BNP and defending political ideology based on racial differences on its front page (cf. article about Schroedinger's Cat).

That was just the first one. Here's the second.

A slow-motion, trickling genocide is being perpetrated by a considerable segment of indigenous blacks and imported browns against the Euro-American part of the population, while the political and cultural elites of the country are interested only in suppressing the relevant statistics on crime and criminality or on IQ differences and their link to achievement differences. All that when not otherwise engaged in promoting the Kwanzaa, issuing postal stamps celebrating the Ramadan, and keeping the southern border open at any cost of life, public treasure or social capital.

The farce of "affirmative action" that goes on even in the highest ranks of the government, the judiciary and academia displaces the more competent whites, particularly white males, with the less competent whose sole virtue is that they are not white males. This too is part of the self-inflicted disembowelment, for in the struggle for existence, which is what reality demands of individuals and nations alike, if you send a government official whose main qualification is that she is an Eskimo lesbian, to negotiate with a Chinese official whose main qualification is an IQ of 150 and a top score on the mandarin examination, the results of the encounter have been pre-determined.

In this society, everyone has grown up on lies that few are equipped to challenge. The older ones have grown up with plastic called leatherette, with cigarettes as symbols of sex appeal, and with Negroes in the front line in the Army but in the back line at the bus stop. And the younger ones have grown up in a world where a short coffee is "tall" and a medium one is "grande," and one's life is ruined for pointing out that the American blacks' mean IQ of 85, and not racism, is the cause of their underepresentation in the upper echelons of government, business and the professions.

529 Yank in the EU  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:32:05pm

Beware of a certain fallacy that white nationalists often try to float. It's one thing to support Europe, which often has as a matter of contingent truth ethnically white, homogeneous societies, in its fight against the jihad, and quite another to think it's a good idea to make an alliance with people who want to fight Islamization through racial nationalism / a racially pure conception of their nation.

530 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:32:48pm

re: #526 Mr Krabs

told to stay quiet and cop it.

Nobody ever suggested anything of the sort.

Fuck off.

531 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:33:48pm

re: #525 Render

If they have separated themselves from BNP...

Then why is Pamela cut-&-pasting BNP articles on her blog?

NO
PRISONERS,
R

She is? Example please? (Her page takes foever to load for me - I'm lazy)

532 Yank in the EU  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:35:59pm

re: #528 wahabicorridor

Thanks, wahabi, I hadn't see that one. Wow.

I detest visiting that site, after once directing many people there.

This controversy has brought a great deal into the light which was hidden. And the people wanted it kept hidden.

533 billhedrick  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:40:09pm

mr krabs.... sigh
binary thinking strikes again. I hate to harp on this is, but a multi-ethnic society is not a nation killer, a multicultural one is. You need to have a France, Germany, Belgium, etc. where a fellow named Sahid can be a proud Frenchman, German, Belgiumer, Belgiumite, Belge... Belgimainan....


Hey little help here?

534 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:41:21pm

re: #418 Steel Rain

The whole discussion here is becoming inane. Mr. Johnson owns this blog so he can take any position he wishes though I think he could have handled it differently and not caused any bridge burnings and still maintained his principled stance.

Discussion is useless due to several well meaning zealots who are shouting down everyone else. My own assessment is that one side is to simplistic and the other to trusting with no middle ground for realpolitik (spit) which may unfortunately be called for in this case. Exactly what groups are there, which pass PC purity checks, that are not part of the multicultural miasma problem? Specific names please. Hell, what groups are there in the US that can fully meet the alluded to criteria?

As for Europe I'll be blunt. I've got about 5 years of living time in Europe (US military) and don't have a very high opinion of a good chunk of the place or it's people. Many are provincial to a degree exceeding what they accuse Americans of being. The various factional undercurrents, across the continent, are confusing to an outsider. The cultural and social differences from America are subtle at times and hard to pin down. The situation in Europe has some bad potentials. We have a noticeable chance of hearing "round three" being called there and getting sucked in. I'd rather not see it but our choices may come down to supporting some distasteful clique or taking the simplistic route of nuking em from orbit as the only way of being sure. I do think more highly of the Eastern Europeans and would try to spare them.

Note, before some of the aforementioned zealots start labeling me a white supremacy supporter. I'm Nordic Cherokee with a Korean wife, a half black grand-daughter and (if my son ever gets busy) a future half Chinese grand-child. Yep, the Aryan brotherhood invites me to lunch regularly..... Label me if you so desire, just be glad I can't legally invite you to early morning coffee and pistols.

Reread the second paragraph of your original post to find out that you wanted to pick the fight with others that posted. You say that Charles didn't have to burn bridges with these unsavory groups and he would still maintain a principled stance. I say that is not the way to go.

535 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:42:35pm

re: #458 Killgore Trout

A sample comment from Gates of Vienna......

Charles was raised a catholic.
The Koran was inspired by a Catholic num who married Muhammad. Notice how similar they are: the black shawls, etc.

Abraham Lincoln warned and knew that he would be assassinated by Jesuits.
.....
The Catholics supported Hitler. Catholicism is fascist and repressive, just like its doppelganger, Islam.

It is obvious that sites like lgf and freerepubic.com are shills for the military industrial complex.


Wow.

Wow is right. Dymphia, Baron, if you are reading, this is really contemptable. The people you have attracted with this side you take are not good for you, and not good for us, and not good for the anti-jihad movement.

I doubt I'll read GoV much anymore. And I'll remove it from my "Favorites" list. No wonder Charles removed GoV from the blogroll.

536 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:42:46pm

re: #532 Yank in the EU

I still visit to keep up. The problem I have now is that I can't take anything there at just-about face value as I once did. I'm probably one of the few Americans around that understands the monster that is the EU and the site is still good for that as long as it's balanced w/others, e.g., EUreferendum.

But boy - what a let down.

537 abefromen  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:46:22pm

re: #495 buzzsawmonkey

wow. such hate, you belong on the Daily Kos, spewing profanity and anger at anyone who does not agree with you.

538 Yank in the EU  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:49:00pm

re: #536 wahabicorridor

Yes, I, too, hope the EU falls apart for the sake of Europeans. It's the ultimate nanny-state, socialist utopian, beaurocratic elitist fantasy.

539 Bearster  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:50:17pm

re: #476 thanos

It's a grand dispute, but the as the left has it's nutroots, so too does the right. The problem with the right's "wingnuts" is that they are attempting to coat-tail and appear mainstream conservative. They aren't - demonstration of that is the civil rights act. More Republicans voted for it than Democrats, and never forget that.

I don't think that this dispute is a matter of degree. Kill-the-jews-and-everyone-else naziism is not a greater degree of opposition to jihad. It's a different kind of thing altogether.

Btw, the civil rights act levies the force of government against private citizens and businesses to deprive them of liberty and property, creates a permanent class of "victims" and is a travesty of injustices. What has this to do with the question of whether nazis are proper allies in our fight against jihad?

540 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:50:54pm

re: #538 Yank in the EU

You left out the most important word.

Totalitarian.

541 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:55:35pm

This is cute, from GoV comments. It's from someone called "The Thinker". Thinker, my rear end.

Fjordman, people like Charles Johnson, or Allahpundit at Hotair who also went on a purge of similar ideological slant, are not conservatives in the traditional way, in the way you would think. There is nothing Right about them. They are what you call - Libertarians.

You, as a European, may not be familiar with these creatures because it is very much an American social phenomenon. So it should come to no surprise that a libertarian has the slanted political view of this situation as CJ has.

When confronted with people in Europe who want Europe to remain European, a liberal, or a libertarian, shouts out = "racist!" or "nazi!" and shows you the door. That is what happened at both blogs. Both are moderated by libertarians who are nothing more than small-government social liberals. One is an avowed atheist, the other with a shady liberal background. Needless to say, the origin of that word libertarian is "liberal" for a reason. And liberal today means Left. As such, respect for counter, or even differing political views, does not apply at such blogs. You tow the line, or you are out. That is what Allahpundit warned at Hotair. Anyone showing support for VB will be banned.

A lesson learned. Beware the libertarian. They are no friend of yours and are half-hearted allies on the war on sharia at best.

I'll leave this here and simply let people comment. I don't need allies like this "Thinker" type if all we're going to do is be insulted by them.

542 Charles  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:56:47pm

Here goes dymphna of GoV again, in the comments at ShrinkWrapped:

[Link: shrinkwrapped.blogs.com...]

543 Render  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 2:59:10pm

re: #531 wahabicorridor

[Link: atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com...]

THERE
YA
GO,
R

544 Yank in the EU  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:02:16pm

re: #540 wahabicorridor

True, the EU does exhibit tendencies, for instance, to control every aspect of the members states (ideas, values, politics, war, etc.) and to suppress conservative freedom of speech, but it lacks the element of the martial method to acheive those means, which seems necessary in any right definition. Maybe something like 'soft totalitarian', if we are being extremely literal? One thing I have become conditioned to in arguing with so many on the left in Germany and Belgium is the need to be extremely literal, otherwise they latch on to the first opportunity to interpret your meaning in bad faith.

545 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:10:32pm
546 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:15:36pm
ask why Fjordman, Gates of Vienna, and Brussels Journal are spending so much time blowing smoke and personally attacking me, instead of addressing the facts.

Because they have a vested interest. The conference was their doing- their work. They built on a shoddy foundation, and now that it's been discovered, they are lashing out because it's easier than taking responsibility.

The attacks are also a natural reaction coming from right-wing populists. From Chip Berlet:

Scapegoating and demagoguery are powerful tools for reactionary backlash movements, and have been used effectively to promote a form of right-wing populism, which channels legitimate anger over declining economic prospects or uncertain social status towards scapegoats that are easy to blame due to the existing currents of racism, sexism, homophobia, and antisemitism flowing through the US social system.

Charles has been added as a scapegoat, along with immigrants. They obfuscate and scapegoat- it is the fascist way.

They have "issues" in europe because of the "muslims" (non-whites), but never mind the problems of socialist policies that have allowed the immigrants into their countries. It's easier to scapegoat the "muslims" than correct the government.

They have "issues" with Charles because he's not buying it, but never mind the smell of opportunism. It's easier to scapegoat Charles as the bad guy holding them back than it is to oust the crypto-fascists in their midst.

Again- along with all the obfuscations, ad hominems, excuses and red herrings- is the fact that their defenders are each other. Look at the sources. Today fjordman cites miniter & "christine"- miniter, friend of belien of brussels journal, and "christine" whose site will work with conference members. Those are biased sources- a little like rather & mapes going with only the document experts who agreed with them. And where are the staunch defenses from other attendees they want to hold up? Where is a staunch defense from Bat Ye'or or Robert Spencer? These two attendees' "neutrality" isn't a positive for them, imo. So- they lean on their network, their "clique".

fjordman, belien, atlas et al can get back to me when they've found a neutral party to defend them. In the mean time- there was a party who was not involved in the conference who agreed with the overall purpose of the conference who took a deeper look, researched and provided facts to his readers. That was Charles Johnson, and because his assessment is not what they want it to be- they vilify him. Like "the masses" waking up to msm bias- people will wake up to them- and the bias they are projecting. The Truth has a funny way of winning out in the end.

547 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:18:27pm

re: #544 Yank in the EU

but it lacks the element of the martial method to acheive those means, which seems necessary in any right definition. Maybe something like 'soft totalitarian',

In the past I have used 'soft totalitarianism' for just that reason. But I've stopped and I'll tell you why.

Because Brussels can tell the media to stop using the term "Islamic terror".

Because the EU mindset allows Geert Wilders and Ayaan Hirsi Ali to twist in the wind

deliberately.

Oh, yes, deliberately. They are the warnings - like heads on pikes outside the Tower of London.

Because the 'European Identity' - whatever that is - is being imposed from above on a helpless populace and is anything but 'organic'.

It's thought control, plain and simple, and the fact that this time around guns haven't been needed is only proof of how insidious it really is.

548 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:20:43pm

re: #543 Render


Well, it started off pretty well - then splat!

549 Yank in the EU  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:34:17pm

re: #547 wahabicorridor

Indeed, interesting point. Also, perhaps the EU elites' passive-aggressive manner in everything can be said to be something worse than a martial method because it simply allows the collapse of their civilization.

550 wahabicorridor  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:38:33pm

re: #549 Yank in the EU

If you want to read the most revealing celebration of the EU, try Mark Leonard's "Why Europe Will Rule the 21st Century"

Europe has been able to extend itself into the lives of Europeans largely unchallenged by seeping into the existing structure of national life, leaving national institutions outwardly intact but inwardly transformed. The 'Europeanization' of national political life has largely gone on behind the scenes, but its very invisibility has seen the triumph of a unique political experiment.

He's now heading up that new Soros initiative on Europe - can't recall the name.

551 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:43:05pm

re: #542 Charles

Here goes dymphna of GoV again, in the comments at ShrinkWrapped:

[Link: shrinkwrapped.blogs.com...]

dymphna and his ilk are going crazy. Crazy because LGF does not want to associate with neo-nazis and their bedfellows. It's as simple as that. They try the smoke and mirrors routine, but it doesn't work. They try to pretend they're one of the good guys. It doesn't work.

552 Mich-again  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:47:23pm
Fjordman's Dramatic Exit(s)

May I suggest a theme song for FjordmanGate? I was thinking
I don't want to show off no more!

553 abefromen  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:49:39pm

re: #545 buzzsawmonkey

Registered lizardoid since: Feb 2, 2005 at 3:31 pm

No. of comments posted (since July 26, 2004): 9,705

I can see that one of us has a job and a life. I'm thinking it's not the one with the 9 posts per day average...oh wait that's me.

buzz off troll.

554 ContraJihadi  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:52:30pm

The supporters of GoV and Atlas want to go their own way. I suppose it is best if lizards quietly choose a different path to follow. The two camps have passed from disagreement to hostility. Nothing good for the anti-Jihadi cause can come from mutual flagellation. Each camp has its own Weltanchauung and agenda.

All that energy can be better vented upon the jihadis, no? If it should ever come to manning the barricades against the sword-swingers, however, a tactical reconciliation can hopefully then be pursued.

555 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:59:54pm
556 Mich-again  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 3:59:58pm

re: #493 abefromen

i swear, there is something i find really funny about this particular "Blog Soap Opera" between LGF and TBJ.

I wonder who's father's brother is going to sleep with who's sisters nephew next...

That was a stupid post.

re: #553 abefromen

I can see that one of us has a job and a life. I'm thinking it's not the one with the 9 posts per day average...oh wait that's me.

That was stupider.

Please keep going. You're on a roll.

557 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:00:31pm

re: #554 ContraJihadi

Except they keep attacking Charles, and he has a right to defend himself. And if he puts up a thread about it, I assume I can defend him too. So no- I'm not going to go quietly on my way. I'm going to continue to call liars "liars" until they either stop lying or I'm asked by a high authority to stop.

558 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:03:31pm

re: #493 abefromen

like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives.

i swear, there is something i find really funny about this particular "Blog Soap Opera" between LGF and TBJ.

I wonder who's father's brother is going to sleep with who's sisters nephew next...

Stay Tuned!


No one is holding a gun to your head to read LGF, read this particular entry, or to post here even.

And you want to talk about soap opera?

559 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:06:01pm

re: #497 dmjung

I'm more than willing to let my two enemies attack each other while I watch.)

Then after both of them are done, it would not matter the winner, if you are on their target list, you won't have any eyes left.

Not taking that chance...nope.

560 Mich-again  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:06:12pm

re: #554 ContraJihadi

The two camps have passed from disagreement to hostility.

Hostility? Thats a bit much.

561 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:11:42pm

re: #110 Charles

My argument is actually more pragmatic than that, and simpler.

It's a mistake for the anti-jihadist bloggers and writers to make alliances with these kinds of groups, because it will alienate mainstream Americans who want nothing to do with anything that smells of Nazis or White Power. And it hands the real enemies--like CAIR--a huge club to beat people like Robert Spencer with, a club they have already used.

Charles,
I have recently been embroiled in an argument with several posters about the fact that there are many explicitly anti-Muslim posts being made here. People who do not distinguish between Islamism, an ideology which we oppose, and Islam, a religion. Many posters show open hatred and disdain of all Muslims and Islam, passing judgment upon individuals by dint of their religion, and they see this prejudice as acceptable on the grounds that it cannot be called racist prejudice (as Islam, like Judaism, isn't a race).
When the such antisemitic, or anti-black posts are made you usually intervene in the discussion, offering your views in no uncertain terms, but you have kept your silence about this phenomenon, despite my attempts of calling attention to it.
I find the views being expressed in these posts and by these posters to be morally reprehensible, no different than antisemitism or racism. Moreover, I believe many people keep their distance from the anti-Jihad movement because of this, as it discredits the information offered and the people involved. I believe this is the reason classical liberals, people whose values should render in strong opposition to Islamism, are reluctant to join forces and openly support us.

As a reader and contributor to your blog, I would like to hear your views about this subject. Even if they are that I should FOAD.

Regards,
Daniel.

562 Josephine  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:18:42pm

re: #542 Charles

Here goes dymphna of GoV again, in the comments at ShrinkWrapped:

[Link: shrinkwrapped.blogs.com...]

I just love how they pick up a word from that "shibboleth" guy and run with it. Their current favourite is philo-Semite.

- shibboleth guy used it
- ShrinkWrapped used it & Dymphna used it in a comment to his article
- Fjordman used it & someone in his comments thread used it

563 Steve Young  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:22:33pm

Back in the early part of Nazi rule in Germany, many otherwise right-minded Germans credited Hitler with improving the German economy while downplaying his racist agenda by referring to it as mostly bluster. Their single-minded preoccupation with the economy at the expense of the big picture gave the Nazis valuable credibility in the early stages of the Reich.

By being focused solely on the issue of Islamofascism at the expense of all other factors, some of our otherwise right-minded friends are lending credibility to today's Neo-Nazis. Fighting the Islamists is our number one priority right now, but not at the price of elevating those who will become the next fascist threat to the world. I completely support Charles in putting this issue front and center. We can win this fight without the Nazis help.

564 abefromen  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:23:38pm

re: #556 Mich-again


re: #558 Highrise

re: #555 buzzsawmonkey

glad to add just a little more drama to your lives, guess you need it. If you could take an objective look at the "situation" between the two blogs. You'd be laughing - but instead you'd much rather have a bit part in the drama. But that's fine, i understand some people have boring lives and would rather create drama in the majority of their 9700+ posts.

I enjoy LGF's articles for the most part and will continue to do so, with our without the blessing of the 'lizzoid commentator click'

Good Day.

565 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:27:32pm

re: #560 Mich-again

re: #554 ContraJihadi

The two camps have passed from disagreement to hostility.

Hostility? Thats a bit much.

But it's heading that way with posters on both sides egging it on. Let it gestate a few more days. There's already people here insinuating that those who don't agree with them lockstep are racists.

566 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:33:35pm

re: #561 stvip

I believe this is the reason classical liberals, people whose values should render in strong opposition to Islamism, are reluctant to join forces and openly support us.

I consider myself a "classic liberal".

Many posters show open hatred and disdain of all Muslims and Islam

And how many times are you going to level this accusation while demanding Charles say something about it? It is simply not true what you are accusing "many" LGFers of being and imo Charles does a good job of removing real haters from this site. Again- if you don't like what "many" of us are saying- you don't have to stay.

And hating an ideology is not morally reprehensible. I find islam to be as disgusting an ideology as fascism. You have a problem with that?

567 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:37:56pm

re: #566 Sharmuta

It almost looks like stalking demanding Charles answers...when you read over the history of stvip's posts.

568 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:42:22pm
569 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:45:20pm

re: #561 stvip

stvip, I agree with you about finding Muslim-bashing disturbing, but speaking for myself, I do not think it is wrong to bash Islam as long as what is being criticized really is Islam and not some strawman misrepresentation of Islam. Unfortunately, jihad is integral to Islam, so portraying Islam as inherently violent and imperialistic is accurate. This is one reason I do not think the newly created word "Islamism" is helpful, because it suggests that there is a significant difference between violent, imperialistic Islam and the Islam of the Quran and Hadith--there is not. If by Islamism you wish to focus on the "political" aspects of Islam, it would be better to use the phrase "political Islam" to distinguish your focus from the "religious Islam" component (prayer, fasting, hajj, etc), because Islamism is too ambiguous and some people think it just means "extremist" or "radical" Islam, as if Islam itself is not inherently extremist or radical--it is, it really is. Islam incorporates "Islamism."

I would agree with you however, that the majority of Muslims around the world are nonviolent, but would add that they are adherents of folk Islam, not really Islam, and that the "authorities" in Islam are using their money and power to get the true Islam message out. While it is important not to underestimate this huge national and threat, bashing Muslims rather than Islam itself is extremely counterproductive to the anti-jihadist movement, imo, better to stick to the facts.

570 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:46:05pm

re: #568 buzzsawmonkey

re: #567 Highrise

Anybody else notice the recent influx of infrequent but nasty posters with registrations going back, in some cases, several years?

It reminds me of how roaches crawl out into the middle of the room to die.

Yes I have definitely noticed. And reading the histories are very telling. Some only come out during issues where white nationalist exposure comes up. I've brought up a few old posts when some of these people crop up.

Some lizard will mention something on another thread that it's been quiet and maybe these people have gone away...but nope, they just lay low and strike out at the end of dead threads sometimes. Some of these threads go on for 2 days when 99 percent of the lgfers have moved on.

571 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:48:23pm
572 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:49:37pm

re: #568 buzzsawmonkey

re: #567 Highrise

Anybody else notice the recent influx of infrequent but nasty posters with registrations going back, in some cases, several years?

It reminds me of how roaches crawl out into the middle of the room to die.

Yes, I also have noticed it.

573 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:49:38pm

re: #568 buzzsawmonkey

I think when some posters repeatedly (especially new ones) ask Charles to define himself almost trying to catch him in something to use elsewhere or as if trying to drive a wedge further between posters wreaks of an alterior motive. Again, the posting history is VERY revealing.

574 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:55:19pm
575 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:55:41pm

re: #573 Highrise

I think this entire issue has revealed to us that there are many shades of moby in the mix. Entryism is being tried by multiple forces. And I have to wonder at not only how many crypto-fascists there are but also how many "unitarians"?

576 Mr Krabs  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:56:09pm

#561 stvip "People who do not distinguish between Islamism, an ideology which we oppose, and Islam, a religion"

Really? As an expert in islam perhaps you could explain how this distinction between islam and islamism works? When do the terrorists suddenly agree that all this head chopping and blowing shit up is no longer required.

I know. It's when all the fools who believe in a distinction between islam and islamism are dead.

577 jeppo[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 4:57:45pm
578 Colonel Panik  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:06:48pm

re: #546 Sharmuta

Sharmuta,
I would be careful about using Chip Berlet as a source for anything...

From David Horowitz's FrontPageMag.com, a source familiar to many of us Lizards:

Chip Berlet: Leftist Lie Factory

Chip Berlet is hailed by left-wingers as their preeminent hunter of fascists, extremists and hatemongers; however, this leftist muckraker hides a history of political extremism and yellow journalism. For example, Berlet has recently turned his poison pen on such dubious "anti-Semites" as David Horowitz. That's because Chip Berlet practices a strain of the leftist faith so vile that even some of his fellow ideologues have disavowed him. Berlet, in turn, has targeted those not sufficiently left-wing for him.

Chip Berlet broke onto the scene as a defender of Communist repression in Albania. Berlet was a founding member of the "Chicago Area Friends of Albania," which formed in 1983 to aid the Stalinist leader of Albania, Enver Hoxha.
In Berlet’s mind, North Korea on the Adriatic was paradise.
His genuine affection for Stalinism might also explain Berlet’s longstanding passion for agitating against our intelligence services, a cause that some experts believe aided the 9/11 hijackers. That Morris Dees' Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and other mainstream entities portray Berlet as a scourge of extremism represents profound ignorance, or malice.
Most recently, Berlet contributed to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s ironically titled “Intelligence Project.” SPLC shamefully prostituted its legacy of confronting the neo-Nazis and the KKK by promoting Berlet’s attempt to smear various non-leftist groups, including the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.

Writing on behalf of the Communist-affiliated National Lawyers Guild the month before the 1992 Presidential Election, Berlet charged that the first “Bush Administration pursued its agenda . . . which borrows heavily from the theories of corporatism, authoritarianism, and militarism adopted by Italian fascism.” Remarkably, Berlet was not attempting satire.

Berlet was Vice President of the National Lawyers Guild, home to the nation's most notorious radical lawyers, among the the terrorist supporting Lynne Stewart.

David Horowitz's letter to Morris Dees re: Chip Berlet's SPLC supported attacks on David Horowitz and the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.

579 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:06:51pm

re: #577 jeppo

the most radical Muslim immigrants already here must be deported.

That is not what they are advocating.

Don't believe it.

Sorry- after the last few weeks- I don't believe you.

580 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:09:06pm

re: #578 Colonel Panik

Thanks for the insight. I'll look into it more, but the article I quoted seemed well reasoned and informative, but I'll take your post into consideration.

581 Colonel Panik  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:19:22pm

re: #580 Sharmuta

re: #578 Colonel Panik

Thanks for the insight. I'll look into it more, but the article I quoted seemed well reasoned and informative, but I'll take your post into consideration.

Berlet's profile at Discover the Networks.

His org: Political Research Associates

This guy would probably consider LGF "fascist". He's in Kos country.

582 Athos  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:26:09pm

re: #515 Yank in the EU

Well said, good post.

583 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:27:14pm

re: #581 Colonel Panik

This guy would probably consider LGF "fascist".

Then I probably pissed him off citing him. LOL

For what it's worth- here is the full article. Again- I thought it was well reasoned, but in the future I'll view his work with a more informed context. Thanks for the links. :)

584 Colonel Panik  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:30:34pm

re: #583 Sharmuta

re: #581 Colonel Panik

This guy would probably consider LGF "fascist".
Then I probably pissed him off citing him. LOL

For what it's worth- here is the full article. Again- I thought it was well reasoned, but in the future I'll view his work with a more informed context. Thanks for the links. :)

Berlet is published by South End Press - Noam Chomsky's publisher.

585 Colonel Panik  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:38:35pm

More on Berlet:
He participated as a speaker at this ZooMass Boston Human Rights Working Groups conference "War on Terrorism or Assault on Human Rights?" with a panopoly of other moonbat Leftists and Islamists.

His presentation was in the "The FBI, Surveillance, and Government Secrecy" section.

586 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:40:33pm

re: #584 Colonel Panik

OK- I get it. He's a flaming leftist. Does that point alone refute everything he says about fascism in that article?

587 Colonel Panik  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:50:52pm

re: #586 Sharmuta

re: #584 Colonel Panik

OK- I get it. He's a flaming leftist. Does that point alone refute everything he says about fascism in that article?

Did I say that it did? I'm not a big fan of Pat Buchanan either, but Berlet is beyond the pale from the other side of the spectrum. He is a denizen of moonbat land. While that piece was fairly well reasoned, if we are going to judge people by the company they keep then Berlet should not be excerpted. Sorry if it seemed like I was beating you over the head with it, but I just want people to be aware of who the guy is.

Berlet would undermine the war against militant islam in a heartbeat.

588 buzzdroid  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:52:32pm

sad really. Fjordman was one of the best and more insightful commenters on here - giving us a perspective on the situation in Scandinavia that nobody else in the MSM was doing. his written articles were a tour-de-force in anti-jihadism.

whether we like it or not the anti-jihad is always going to have to be a "big tent" - and yes, that will include unsavoury characters. but , what the hell - this is charles' blog and he's free to do what the hell he likes. thats freedom.

589 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:52:35pm

re: #565 Steel Rain


I don't agree with your statement at all. I see spades being called spades and that is what LGF does and makes it a good blog. People should be defending their thoughts written here.

You can't stand this subject anyway so I don't get why you are helping to fan the flames?

I think I'll not bother to read either LGF or GoV for a couple of weeks till they both get over it.

I don't think it's something that LGF needs to get over. Perhaps you should just skip the content you dislike?

590 buzzdroid  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 5:58:40pm

re: #563 Steve Young

errr.. there are bugger all Nazi's in Europe. they have no political support, and amount to a bunch of skinheads who shout a lot. their electoral support amounts to 0.000001 per cent.

most of them are actually leftists who have infiiltrated - and are doing such things to discredit the anti-immigrant and anti-jihad parties in Europe.

read Fjordman's articles a bit more and it will become clear to you.

591 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:01:53pm

re: #588 buzzdroid

whether we like it or not the anti-jihad is always going to have to be a "big tent" - and yes, that will include unsavoury characters.

I think there is a difference between those fascists like nazi's attach themselves to a group vs. them being invited/welcomed into it.

592 wanumba  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:02:01pm

Prediction that over the next year or so, there will be more separating of sheep and goats. A few more people who are still holding out, will wander away, finally accepting they had been supporting actual fascists, disillusioned, having defended people who they thought were something better than the reality, but the rest will remain - they knew what they had from the get-go and liked it.
Just gots to wait and see how it pans out - amongst supporters and amongst blogs. It'll be soberly interesting to see who turns away and who stays - probably won't be who we would think, if the first blog versus blog skirmish for the truth was any example.

593 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:03:02pm

re: #573 Highrise

re: #568 buzzsawmonkey

I think when some posters repeatedly (especially new ones) ask Charles to define himself almost trying to catch him in something to use elsewhere or as if trying to drive a wedge further between posters wreaks of an alterior motive. Again, the posting history is VERY revealing.

I don't understand why you are reading so much malicious intent into stvip's comments. False accusation is a serious thing, and though I don't agree with what I understand to be stvip's benign view of Islam in general, that it's merely a religion, I think he's raising a critical issue, very much similar to the whole Vlaams Belang mess. No one's obliged to address it, of course, but when instead of discussing stvip's issue one attacks stvip by imputing motives, this seems very unfair.

594 EE  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:08:42pm

The phenomenon that seems to be unmentioned is that the Muslim population doubles every generation, while the European non-Muslim population is in constant decline. For European non-Muslims, the birth rate is less than the death rate, and the median age of its population is growing older. European non-Muslims are growing fewer and fewer, and older and older. The Muslim population is getting more and more numerous at a rapid rate, and it is also getting younger. This means that the European non-Muslim population is headed toward extinction. At the same time, the Muslim population, doubling every generation, is headed toward taking over Europe.

Even if immigration is capped, or even if it stopped, it won't change the basic trend. Immigration affects the date at which the Muslim population will outnumber the non-Muslim population, but it doesn't affect the basic trend, and the obvious end result.

Even if there is a minor expulsion of Muslims, that won't change the basic trend. It will affect the date on which Muslims reach a majority, but not the end result.

Even if there are efforts to discourage, or even to stop outright any and all conversions to Islam, that won't change the basic trend. These things can only affect the date when Muslims are a majority, but not the end result.

Reforming Muslims so that they are not supremacist, so they are not hostile to non-Muslims, so that they do not subjugate women, so they do not murder gays, so they do not murder apostates, so they recognize human rights, so they abandon hyperjihadism, so that Islamofasicsm is abandoned, is one way that the Islamization of Europe might become more palatable.

What the White Nationalists will offer toward stopping the Islamization of Europe are (1) a Nazi holocaust to slaughter all people considered undesirable by the White Nationalists -- Muslims, Jews, gays, and whoever else they decide to target; and/or (2) an Isabella solution; in 1492, Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain expelled all Jews and Muslims who refused to convert. On top of this, the White Nationalists would also expel all people of color. So it would be an Isabella plus racism solution.

The remaining white non-Muslims would seek to establish a fortress that they would try to defend against a growing Muslim population outside their fortress. But, with their continued refusal to repopulate themselves, their continued refusal to increase their birth rate to match their death rate, the inhabitants of fortress Europe (or of fortresses in sections of Europe) would have diminishing numbers and their median age would grow. With fewer numbers and old age, they will be militarily defeated. Eventually they would become extinct anyhow, because of their refusal to repopulate themselves.

With either approach of the White Nationalists, massacre or mass expulsion, there will be resistance to their efforts, so there will be bloodshed all around. And the end result will be the same for their descendants, if they have any descendants -- they will become extinct.

On the other hand, if the non-Muslim European population gets religion and decides to repopulate itself, the situation can be stabilized, if their birthrate is sufficiently large to match that of the Muslim population.

595 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:10:53pm

re: #569 Orde

I disagree that there is no difference between Islam and Islamism. I do not understand why you would adopt the Wahhabist viewpoint on this subject.
Basically, I think the reliance upon the text of the Koran alone in order to explain contemporary Islamism is naive. No text exists without an interpretation of it. And each interpretation can be implemented in practice in a myriad of ways. I have already discussed this many times, so I don't want to repeat it. I'll just reiterate that it would be illuminating to compare Islam and Judaism. The texts of the Torah and the Talmud are also believed to be "received texts", and they contain many uncompromising, explicit commands of violence. For example, the command to kill homosexuals. This is especially relevant, because the ban on homosexuality applies to all nations of the world, not only Jews (it is one of the 7 Noahide Laws which are supposed to apply to gentiles as well). The Talmud, read as is, is also clearly incompatible with democracy and liberal societies. These are not theoretical issues, either, as any study of Israel's internal problems and the rise of Jewish extremism and terrorism should make clear. Yet this does not justify antisemitism. Nor does it mean devout Jews cannot live in democratic, liberal societies, and be proponents of liberalism themselves.

There's a whole chicken-and-egg fallacy with how people regard contemporary extremist Islam. It is a superficial understanding of the situation to ascribe terrorism, violence and extremism to Islam, rather than the other way around - Islam has become radicalized by people (and societies) who were already anti-democratic activists, supporters of violence, or just plain terrorists. People will seek and listen to the justifications they want to hear. For example, some of the highest authorities, of both Shia and Sunni Islam have outlawed, with no equivocations, suicide bombings. But the Palestinian terrorists will disregard a fatwa outlawing suicide bombings from, say, Grand Ayatollah Sanei, in favour of some low-level local Sheikh (say, Yassin) who allows it. This is obviously not being "good Muslims", merely good terrorists.
In the struggle to make Islam the root of all evil, I've seen many revisionist interpretations of history, making Arafat a devout Muslim (why else would he be such a murderous thug?), and even attributing Syrian aggression to a religious basis (people making a big deal out of Assad being an Alawite, an offshoot of Shia).

This is a culture war. The divide is between personal freedom, modernity, democracy - the West, on one side, versus tribalism, primitivism, despotism - all things prevalent in the Midde East, with or without Islam being a major factor.
As an Israeli, it doesn't make much of a difference to me whether the people attacking me are guided by a religious (Hamas), secular (PLO, most Arab states) or even anti-religious (the Baath party, Communism) creed. It amounts to the same, and Islam is only one, relatively recent as a major force, facet of the war against Israel and Jews.

You think Islam is incapable of producing mainstream peaceful interpretations of the Koran? Look, for example, here:
[Link: www.livingislam.org...]

596 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:14:53pm

re: #593 Orde

Orde,

His history speaks for itself as I pointed out in my post that said I wasn't buying it from him. Read those threads, people do ask him questions and he ends up throwing up his hands and disappearing. All I can say is it smells whenever he seems to be challenged by lizards. Now that he has done it in a pattern, I feel more comfortable calling him out on it. I think Charles not answering him should also be an indicator that something smells.

I just like to be careful when someone posts like he does whether I align myself with him or not. Others can take the risk if they wish to align with his posts so early.

All I can say is my gut usually is right on mobies and trolls, perhaps that comes with many years experience on the net and running my own community for a number of years and dealing with people who have alterior motives and post such as he does. I can see the lingo. Doesn't mean I can't be wrong, but I honestly don't think I'm wrong about stvip and I know I'm not alone. It also is why I saw immediately through atlas' crap when it took others a bit to see it.

597 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:19:35pm

re: #566 Sharmuta

And hating an ideology is not morally reprehensible. I find islam to be as disgusting an ideology as fascism. You have a problem with that?

Yes. Islam is not an ideology. Your statements makes me wonder whether you've ever met and talked with a Muslim.
And when Highrise says "I do not want any Muslims around me", it find it no different than someone proclaiming "I do not want any Jews around me".

598 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:19:38pm

I see the issue as pretty clearre: #589 Highrise

re: #565 Steel Rain


I don't agree with your statement at all. I see spades being called spades and that is what LGF does and makes it a good blog. People should be defending their thoughts written here.

You can't stand this subject anyway so I don't get why you are helping to fan the flames?

I think I'll not bother to read either LGF or GoV for a couple of weeks till they both get over it.
I don't think it's something that LGF needs to get over. Perhaps you should just skip the content you dislike?

I couldn't agree more with you. This blog is great because Charles sticks to his guns come hell or high water.

599 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:22:36pm

re: #595 stvip
I'm still reading your comment, but right away you assumed I am relying on the text of the Quran alone--as in to the exclusion of other texts (namely Hadith and Sira), and I just want to say, absolutely not--nor do Wahhaabis (who I prefer to refer to as Salafis, because that's more global). (In fact Quran-alone types are considered unorthodox, and I agree.) Anyway, I just recognize that the Quran is recognized as authoritative, and it is precisely because of this that one then to be observant of the Quran, must turn to the Hadith and Sira, since the Quran requires following of the example of Muhammed and this example is found in those other sources. Anyway, I'm going back to read the rest of your comment, but wanted to clarify right away and obvious foundational misunderstanding. And for the record, I do not support Wahabism/Salafism, but only find it consistent with the Quran and example of Muhammed, unlike many other sects.

600 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:23:47pm

re: #596 Highrise

Read those threads, people do ask him questions and he ends up throwing up his hands and disappearing.

Liar.
I may not have the time to follow every message posted in every thread, but I did my best to answer each type of question at least once (that is, if several people asked me the same thing worded differently, I'd only answer one of them). I also uncovered my email in one thread so that people could be sure to reach me if they wanted to debate seriously.

601 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:24:19pm

re: #597 stvip

re: #566 Sharmuta


And hating an ideology is not morally reprehensible. I find islam to be as disgusting an ideology as fascism. You have a problem with that?

Yes. Islam is not an ideology. Your statements makes me wonder whether you've ever met and talked with a Muslim.
And when Highrise says "I do not want any Muslims around me", it find it no different than someone proclaiming "I do not want any Jews around me".

Uhh..jews don't have a book that instructs that my family needs to die. Trying to do an equivalency to jews is a bunch of crap and you know it.

I'm starting to think you are a muslim yourself.

All I have to say to you was in this thread.

Charles nor I or other lgfers answer to YOU. Who do you think you are? Seriously? To come here and make the demands that you have that Charles answer you and people who speak truth about what islam is need to be purged or it'll mean that Charles is being a hypocrite by calling out vb?

602 EE  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:25:55pm

#595 stvip refers to the 7 Noahide laws. Here is a list:
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
According to this list, on the sex side it states that adultery should not be committed. You can also find that in the 10 commandments.

The 7 laws do not call for murdering gays. In the 21st century, that is a feature of Islam. It is not something in modern Judaism, nor can it be found in the 10 commandments, nor can it be found in the 7 Noahide laws.

As I see it, the problem with Islam today is its inability to evolve, its inability to adapt to the times and to modern values. The Wahhabis are unahappy with any changes that have been made in 14 centuries, and want to go back in time some 14 centuries. That is no way for a religion to evolve. They are stuck in a rut, and it is a rut that is bad for the rest of the world.

603 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:26:32pm

re: #599 Orde

but right away you assumed I am relying on the text of the Quran alone--as in to the exclusion of other texts (namely Hadith and Sira)

Objection sustained - I meant the holy texts alone.

604 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:30:24pm

re: #572 NY Nana

re: #568 buzzsawmonkey

re: #567 Highrise

Anybody else notice the recent influx of infrequent but nasty posters with registrations going back, in some cases, several years?

It reminds me of how roaches crawl out into the middle of the room to die.

Yes, I also have noticed it.

Humerous observation. So now there's a posting volume purity test? So now longevity without volume denotes sinister intent? So now anyone who doesn't have at least 7k to 15k posts is a closest racist? Keep following the trend youngsters, you'll eventually surpass Kos.

Several are trying to reason with the posters here out of concern for the community. Several have honestly asked if these groups are unacceptable then what would be acceptable? No answer just general derision and innuendos. Fine, do nothing. If the situation does go bad your government, no matter which party is in power, will make a realpolitik decision for you.

This has went beyond the owners of a couple of blogs disagreeing with each other about policy. This has now passed beyond simple discussion of approaches. You've now got two main factions sniping at each other and anyone in between. Pfft, keep digging. I'm now fully unimpressed by all concerned.

605 EE  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:31:49pm

From the link in #602

The Seven Laws

The seven laws listed by the Talmud are[6]

1. Prohibition of Idolatry: - There is only one God. You shall not make for yourself an idol.
2. Prohibition of Murder: - You shall not murder.
3. Prohibition of Theft: - You shall not steal.
4. Prohibition of Sexual Promiscuity: - You shall not commit adultery.
5. Prohibition of Blasphemy: - Revere God and do not blaspheme.
6. Prohibition of Cruelty to Animals: - Do not eat the flesh of an animal while it is still alive.
7. Requirement to have just Laws: - You shall set up an effective government to police the preceding six laws.

This is different than the call to hyper-jihadism, which is what the ideology taught by the Wahhabis, and by Khomeini, and by al-Banna, and Mawdudi, and Qutb, and Azzam, is all about. That is a warrior ideology, based on a notion of supremacy, and jihad to gain conquest.

606 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:32:35pm

re: #602 EE

The law refers to sexual deviance, which includes male homosexuality.

In the 21st century, that is a feature of Islam. It is not something in modern Judaism

You'd be surprised what can be found in "modern Judaism" in Israel.

But my point is the opposite of that - that Judaism is mostly moderate, and is compatible with democratic liberal societies, despite the text of the Torah and Talmud. There is no reason the same could not become true of Islam.

As I see it, the problem with Islam today is its inability to evolve, its inability to adapt to the times and to modern values

Definitely.

607 swamprat  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:33:32pm

re: #473 Charles

now, that's MY kind of atheist!And I say that as a Christian.

608 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:37:43pm

re: #589 Highrise

re: #565 Steel Rain


I don't agree with your statement at all. I see spades being called spades and that is what LGF does and makes it a good blog. People should be defending their thoughts written here.

You can't stand this subject anyway so I don't get why you are helping to fan the flames?

I think I'll not bother to read either LGF or GoV for a couple of weeks till they both get over it.

I don't think it's something that LGF needs to get over. Perhaps you should just skip the content you dislike?

OOO shiny. So you pull a snippet from a completly different thread for a drive by? So by not snapping to and agreeing verbatim I'm fanning the flames? See my above post. You're little foray only reinforces my observation.

609 swamprat  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:38:01pm

Several are trying to reason with the posters here out of concern for the community
re: #604 Steel Rain
Oh, thank you! Your concern is so greatly appreciated!

610 EE  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:38:32pm

According to the list in the link in #602, the sex part is:

4. Prohibition of Sexual Promiscuity: - You shall not commit adultery.

If this is broadened, then it is not the original list of 7.

611 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:40:09pm

re: #597 stvip

islam is most certainly an ideology, being that it is more than a religion- it is a political movement as well, thus making it "sociopolitical".

Your statements makes me wonder whether you've ever met and talked with a Muslim.

I most certainly have, as well as apostates. Your statements make me wonder what your motivations are. Who are you to repeatedly come in here and demand clarifications from the blog master as to what level of rhetoric he allows because it goes against your sensibilities? What kind of Israeli are you?

612 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:41:20pm

re: #608 Steel Rain

You are the one who said you were leaving because you couldn't stand the subject matter. It had absolutely nothing to do with snapping to or agreeing to anything. Those are your words.

613 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:41:35pm
614 Dead Sea Squirrel  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:42:47pm

re: #600 stvip

stvip, may I take a whack at this issue? I haven't tangled with you and have no axe to grind with you, and you seem sincere to me. I'm proceeding on that presumption.

First of all, I agree with you that Islam is theoretically reformable into something peaceful. I have articulated this on numerous occasions and had friendly arguments with others here at LGF that think otherwise. There are lizards of both varieties: those who think Islam is irreformable and must perish, and those who think it can be rearticulated in a benign form if sufficient will exists to do so. Since you and I are in a minority, don't be surprised if folks want to argue with you. Charles obviously allows both positions free reign at LGF, so long as the discussion remains civil.

Secondly, I think you mistake expressions of moral outrage at specific actions as "Muslim-hatred." Charles posts another story about terrorist child murder, and comments like "[bigoted word]s" and "scum" follow. My read is that Charles allows wide lattitude to expressions of righteous outrage at specific heinous acts. There are times when fury is the right response, and you should not presume that blistering remarks directed at the subject of some particular post by Charles are applicable to all one billion Muslims. Charles is quite clear that expressions of genocide or mass deportation of Muslims en masse are unacceptable.

My Christian faith teaches me that I must not hate anyone, not even Osama bin Laden, let alone a random Muslim. Others here feel that way too, either because of the same Christian ethic or on some other basis. But not everyone here comes from there, and some feel that, yes, there is nothing wrong with hating evil people. I'm not here to preach to them. LGF is not my church. It helps me to keep informed about the evil and how we can effectively counteract it, in the company of people who at least still can recognize evil when they see it.

615 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:43:44pm

re: #608 Steel Rain

Your condescension is making me ill :(

616 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:43:45pm

re: #595 stvip
Response, Part II:
Well, I finished carefully reading your thoughts about Islam, and you are just wrong. However, I do think it is fair to raise, as many, including Muslims, do, the issue of violence in the Bible as compared with the Quran, because for those with only a superficial familiarity with the two it might seem that sure, both texts have violent passages, both are subject to interpretations, and that the meaning is all in the interpretation, and both are probably more or less o.k., if interpreted fairly, or both equally bad. Well, no. I, too, approached the Quran, long before 9/11 that way, when my Muslim friend gave it to me I opened in expecting not to agree, but to find some interesting teachings, maybe moral sayings and so on, whether I agreed or not. Boy was I shocked! Not at all the same as the Bible. The analogy fails upon inspection for numerous reasons due to historical and textual context--all speech has context--and distinguishing between what is a general precept and what was a command given to a specific theocratic nation in history. Unlike the Islamic ummah, neither the nation-state of Israel today nor the broader global Jewish community is trying to impose any laws, Noahide or otherwise, on other nations. Sharing beliefs is not imposing.

617 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:48:13pm

re: #597 stvip

"Islam is not an ideology"
stvip, it's an entire worldview, and entire way of life, an entire way of thinking, it is not merely or even mostly limited to worship, but is very much a political system--what will it take for you to believe this?

618 EE  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:48:18pm

#616 Orde

Sharing beliefs is not imposing.

That is true.

619 Steel Rain[deleted]  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:49:18pm
620 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:52:51pm

re: #610 EE

I don't have the 613 commands here, but it is true that the 7 Noahide laws are expanded by at least 50 of them, but I'm not going to waste time looking up the others now, because to me (a Christian) it's a diversion--it's obvious tiny New Jersey-sized Israel that even gives away land that it only gained by defending against aggression, is neither expansionist or aggressively seeking to impose religious laws on the rest of the world. A purely inflammatory red herring.

621 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:54:57pm

re: #619 Steel Rain

I naturally question people who come into threads and say they hate the discussion going on and will disappear for a few weeks until the subject matter goes away, then show up to do some more finger shaking themselves in another thread along the same topic. BTW, I happened to see your post on the other thread because it was near mine I was referring to in another post here.

I will never support a group that invites nazi's to the table. I've answerd this question numerous times on this blog.

622 swamprat  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 6:58:29pm

re: #595 stvip ...........................................

You think Islam is incapable of producing mainstream peaceful interpretations of the Koran? Look, for example, here:
[Link: [Link: www.livingislam.org...]...]


.................................................. ............................I really do wish them well. But in the world of islam, those cry out for peace, often end up being "deathly" quiet. It would seem that there is an ongoing campaign to accentuate the more violent aspects of islam itself. And furthermore it appears that this is in itself a power play, with some of the players being out in the open, while others hide in the background. And of course, as it is with any major game, several factions are using the actions of others to further their own agenda.

623 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:02:09pm

stvip, to clarify, my question to you in #617 was not rhetorical, I really want to know what it would take for you to admit that Islam is an ideology? Do you want sources from the Quran, Hadith, Sira? You want someone from Al-Azhar? Tafsir? What will you take for proof?

624 EE  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:02:10pm

Fjordman considers whether "Islam" can change, and Fjordman says that it cannot. But the more relevant question is whether large numbers of Muslims and their descendants can and will change for the better, such as abandoning hyperjihadism, abandoning a system of subjugation of women and treating them as some man's property, abandoning an attitude of armed conquest for the sake of spreading their religion, abandoning the supremacist drive, abandoning the notion that once lands have been conquered by Muslims that land remains forever Muslim land, and seeing the benefits of democracy instead of theocracy. If Muslims change, it does not gravely matter whether the abstraction that we call "Islam" changes with that change of the attitude of Muslims, or whether "Islam" is an immutable abstraction.

Fjordman seems to ignore completely the possibility that non-Muslim Europeans might change their attitude toward repopulating themselves, and start to reverse their trend toward becoming extinct, and Fjordman seems to ignore completely the whole issue of birth rates versus the death rate, which is more important at this time than the more minor matters like capping or even stopping Muslim immigration.

625 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:02:13pm

re: #617 Orde

I find it a real telling little sentence, myself.

626 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:05:06pm

re: #604 Steel Rain

If you are so unimpressed, please do not waste your precious time on the likes of us.

Buh, bye! Just don't slam the door as you leave.

627 EE  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:06:00pm

re: #620 Orde

re: #610 EE

I don't have the 613 commands here, but it is true that the 7 Noahide laws are expanded by at least 50 of them, but I'm not going to waste time looking up the others now, because to me (a Christian) it's a diversion--it's obvious tiny New Jersey-sized Israel that even gives away land that it only gained by defending against aggression, is neither expansionist or aggressively seeking to impose religious laws on the rest of the world. A purely inflammatory red herring.

You are right.

628 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:06:02pm

re: #613 buzzsawmonkey

re: #604 Steel Rain

So now there's a posting volume purity test? So now longevity without volume denotes sinister intent? So now anyone who doesn't have at least 7k to 15k posts is a closest racist?

Oh, please. How's that new-model reductio ad absurdum working for you?

In any community, those already there will take the newcomer's measure before accepting him or her. If you suddenly show up at the picnic and start throwing cole slaw at everyone in range, you will get a hostile reaction.

There have been a lot of people popping up here suddenly who want to lay into all around them--and then start whining if they get answered to in kind. Looking at their profiles, a surprising number have been registered for years, but have posted only a handful of times.

I really don't care about acceptance neighbor. Without intentionally starting a fight I'll simply say your acceptance is unneeded unless you can show me where you pay the bills for this site. Even with your or anyone else acceptance here I'll probably go back to reading only.

If you or several others here seem to believe volume of posting conveys some type of ownership or moral authority I feel happy that I haven't posted here more often.

629 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:13:55pm

re: #626 NY Nana

re: #604 Steel Rain

If you are so unimpressed, please do not waste your precious time on the likes of us.

Buh, bye! Just don't slam the door as you leave.

Don't worry neighbor. I will never intentionally start a conversation with you.

630 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:17:24pm

re: #611 Sharmuta

What kind of Israeli is he? I would hazzard a guess he lives in the Tel Aviv area...where they are addicted to coffee shops, etc.

I cannot picture him in Jerusalem...but I could be wrong. I hope I am not.

Remember his best buddy on LGF, Carol Herman? She was no Israeli, thankfully.

631 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:21:23pm

re: #623 Orde

I'm going to give a brief answer, then go to sleep (it's dawn here).
As Daniel Pipes (the more I read from him, the more my respect grows) wrote: Islam is whatever Muslims want it to be.

If tomorrow Muslims decide they must all go voleyball playing as their interpretation of how best to fulfill some command from the Koran, who are we to argue with them?

It would be a game of semantics to try to delineate where religion ends and ideology begins; obviously you could say all these religions have all-encompassing edicts about how to live day-by-day, and what ethics system one maintains, etc., and are thus ideologies. My point is that Islam isn't different in this regard from other religions.

Now, contemporary Islam certainly does have a major problem with Islamofascism. This is not something we should tolerate. But extending the battle to a war against Islam itself is futile, dangerous and unethical. As long as they maintain peaceful beliefs - and these certainly are compatible with Islam - they are not my enemies.
500 years ago the idea that Christianity could be a peaceful religion might have seemed far-fetched as well, a dreamer's delusion. Thankfully, Christianity is mostly reformed. (and note that Islamism would have to proceed at the current rate of violence for many, many years before it even begins to approach the toll Christianity has exacted on the Jewish people)
Again, I see a lack of perspective about the historical roles all the religions have played, and their potential for violence (and also the contemporary problems with Judaism in Israel; you think only Muslims are terrified of Zionist Hair Rays?). And a lack of perspective about the Middle East and Arab culture in general, regardless of Islam; the region is a source of violence, extremism and misery, with and without Islam.

632 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:21:24pm

re: #623 Orde

stvip, to clarify, my question to you in #617 was not rhetorical, I really want to know what it would take for you to admit that Islam is an ideology? Do you want sources from the Quran, Hadith, Sira? You want someone from Al-Azhar? Tafsir? What will you take for proof?

I'm with you. stvip should either tell us how we're wrong or ask us to further prove our point. But I don't think we're going to get either, because you and I are right.

You see- I think stvip's mask slipped a bit there, and we've hit on a subject stvip is not wont to discuss, because what stvip does want to discuss is the level of rhetoric used on this blog and how it makes muslims and "classical liberals" uncomfortable and won't Charles come clarify. I sense disingenuousness, and I'm not afraid to express that.

633 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:25:19pm

re: #630 NY Nana

re: #611 Sharmuta

What kind of Israeli is he? I would hazzard a guess he lives in the Tel Aviv area...where they are addicted to coffee shops, etc.

I cannot picture him in Jerusalem...but I could be wrong. I hope I am not.

Remember his best buddy on LGF, Carol Herman? She was no Israeli, thankfully.

"Israeli" is often a Christian Identity code word, not saying that's how stvip is using it that way here, while for most of us "Israeli" means a person living in the nation-state called "Israel" over in the Middle East, for others--many, many others--Israeli refers to those who are members of the 10 tribes of Israel (back from when the 12 tribes were split into the northern 10 called Israel and the southern 2 called Judah), and ridiculously many British and American anglos think they are the real Israelites. Words like "Israel" and "Jew" have different meanings for them, so one's always got to be careful when talking with them, that they're not talking past each other because of different meanings for the same words. Even some that are not in Christian Identity, but just outside it in the Reformed movement talk this way.

634 PETN Sandwich  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:25:28pm

re: #631 stvip

Islamism would have to proceed at the current rate of violence for many, many years before it even begins to approach the toll Christianity has exacted on the Jewish people

Sorry 'bout the "+", it was supposed to be a "-".

635 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:25:32pm

re: #631 stvip

It would be a game of semantics to try to delineate where religion ends and ideology begins; obviously you could say all these religions have all-encompassing edicts about how to live day-by-day, and what ethics system one maintains, etc., and are thus ideologies. My point is that Islam isn't different in this regard from other religions.

Name one western country that has the Bible for it's constitution.

636 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:28:35pm

re: #631 stvip

I don't see how you answered Orde at all!

637 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:29:27pm

re: #616 Orde

Unlike the Islamic ummah, neither the nation-state of Israel today nor the broader global Jewish community is trying to impose any laws, Noahide or otherwise, on other nations.

But that is exactly the point. Despite the command to execute homosexuals (specifically, those who have engaged in male homosexual acts), which is as explicit and unequivocal as can be, Jews do not run around murdering gays (well, usually ). If Jews can disregard such an explicit command in text which is believed to have been dictated word by word by God, why can't Muslims?

Sharing beliefs is not imposing.

If you think there are no attempts at imposing Halakha upon secular Jews, you should do some (very depressing) reading.

638 stvip  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:33:28pm

re: #637 stvip

Oh, and I mentioned Sanei. This is not some fringe preacher with no crowd, he is a very high ranking (Grand Ayatollah) and popular modernist Muslim leader:
[Link: www.roozonline.com...]
[Link: www.roozonline.com...]
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

639 Mich-again  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:34:19pm

I got in a dead thread debate with a couple Euros in May 2006 about a ECRI report about racism in Denmark and now going back and re-reading some of the posts from the obscure posters who came out of the woodwork, I see poster Rune was the most vocal one. And from BabbaZees report about Nazis and Runes, I find that nic particularly odd given the vile I got from him(?) when I said I tended to agree with parts of the report. Anyway these debates didn't just start here in the last couple weeks. They've been flaring up here and there for a long time.

640 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:35:35pm

re: #637 stvip

why can't Muslims?

Why are you asking us? Go ask them.

641 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:38:57pm

re: #631 stvip

It's dawn where--in the nation-state of Israel ? are you an Israeli in that sense, that you live in the Middle East nation with Ehud Olmert as prime minister or do you consider yourself an Israeli for some other reason, this will make conversation more comprehensible to know where you are coming from as far as that goes.

I am familiar with Daniel Pipes, someone Bush has turned to (even if Pipes does say Bush didn't listen to him, I disagree), and find him more harmful than helpful. I would really like you to answer my specific question on what authoritative source would you accept in order to prove Islam is an ideology? Pipes? Are you familiar with the scrutiny the ahadith went through to determine which hadith are authoritative and which are not, the isnad requirements, the idea of Islamic consensus--do you deny all this and prefer instead Esposito, Karen Armstrong, or even your Pipes (though clearly he's not as bad as the former 2, which is why he's arguably more dangerous). Well, good night, and I hope to learn more of where you're coming from at some future time, so that I might change your mind--but I've got to know what authorities you will accept.

642 Syrah  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:42:44pm

What is a "Moderate" Muslim?

643 PETN Sandwich  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:44:20pm

re: #637 stvip

If Jews can disregard such an explicit command in text which is believed to have been dictated word by word by God, why can't Muslims?

Individual Jews can be agnostic/atheist, a lapsed muslim still calls himself a muslim. Others label Jews a race, muslims label themselves a race.

Most religions recognize temporal law.

It is not that muslims cannot, it is that they will not.

644 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:47:33pm

re: #629 Steel Rain


I answered your question yet you evade mine?

Tis ok. I'll find a way to live :P .

645 J.S.  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:48:17pm

I think a lot of people (including Fjordman) are trying to figure out what is at the core of Islam. What is the essence of Islam. And if that core is hostile to modernity -- can that core be changed? can Muslim reformers make headway?

I read one academic who offered the following analogy to explain his understanding of Islam...(the academic's a Christian, thus, the Christian references.) He claims that Islam (unlike the history of Christianity) starts out as a Protestant Religion (that is, it is puritanical, rule-based, militaristic, practical -- takes an interest in economic/mercantile affairs -- not really "other-worldly"). That's the "core". Then, as Islam developed and spread, you get the "Catholic" versions -- that's with the saints, the relics, the other-worldliness, the mysticism (think Turkey and Sufis). So, when people begin to speak of "reform" -- for Muslims this means "going back to the original version" -- which in turn means becoming Puritanical, harsh, Militaristic, etc. "Reform" in the Muslim world does not translate into "liberalism." You get the opposite. (There was -- from what I've read -- only one time in which a "reform" of Islam translated into a more liberal version...all the other "reform" periods were marked with harsh retreats -- going backwards, not forwards, in terms of "liberalism." Of course, this is an over-simplification...but it provides a larger outline (framework) for what's occuring right now with islam (which is, in fact, undergoing a "reform" -- but it's a bin Laden form of "reform"). (I also listen to the Da'wa programs -- and it's considered -- I believe this is mainstream Islamic thinking that if someone calls you a Salafist -- that's a compliment...because it suggests you're like the "pure", original founders of Islam. However, if someone calls you a Wahhabi, then that's an insult...it's a derogatory term.

646 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:52:24pm

re: #631 stvip

If tomorrow Muslims decide they must all go voleyball playing as their interpretation of how best to fulfill some command from the Koran, who are we to argue with them?


So let's just not even read the koran and go off their words? Let's not even be allowed to question it because who are we to take them at their instruction book? Either you have not read the koran or you are trying to downplay what it says/commands to it's followers.

No crystal ball exists to see what muslim will follow the commands of their koran. Not a one. Life is too precious for me to take people who follow such a cult at their word.

647 Orde  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:53:17pm

re: #642 Syrah

What is a "Moderate" Muslim?

Exactly. This is something of an oxymoron, because Islam (as defined by the Quran and Sunnah) is inherently imperialistic and jihadist--but where it is possible to be "moderate" is in the methodology of carrying out the jihad--takfir against other Muslims and violence against infidels now, or jihad through stages of infiltration (diplomatic jihad, propaganda jihad, economic jihad, emmigration jihad, etc) that give the appearance of moderation, when sure, the outward behavior is temporarily more moderate, but the underlying ideology and aim is still extreme. Then there are the many Muslims who adhere to folk Islam of one sort or another, but it's arguable whether or not they are even Muslim, since some of their beliefs and practices go directly against the most fundamental of Islamic teachings, monotheism.

(Good night everyone.)

648 NY Nana  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 7:57:13pm

re: #633 Orde

I have a number of friends in Israel...who are Jewish. They are Israelis.

I know that there are Christians and also the cult of islam who are Israelis, along with the Bahaii, whose are centered in Haifa, and probably a number of other real religions..Israelis, if they are citizens. I usually refer to people by their nationality, not their religion, unless it is pertinent to the subject.

649 Sharmuta  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:05:06pm

re: #642 Syrah

What is a "Moderate" Muslim?

An apostate.

650 Mich-again  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:24:26pm

re: #649 Sharmuta

re: #642 Syrah

What is a "Moderate" Muslim?

An apostate.

And therein lies the problem.

651 J.S.  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 8:43:00pm

I think there's a word lacking in the English vocabulary. The word would be the opposite of a proselytizer...

I recall reading a text on the three Monotheistic religions. The text was divided into sections which dealt with certain topics -- for example, there would be a section on "Authority" (followed by 3 chapters -- one written from the Jewish perspective, next chapter from the Christian perspective, then a chapter on the Islamic perspective...) Early on, it became clear that the Jewish writers were offering a running (hostile) commentary. It was ridiculous. So, I'd read these "sales" chapters on Islam and Christianity, and then I'd get the anti-sales version (Barney's Version?) from the "Jewish" chapters. The differences were annoying (mildly amusing) (the Christian apologists would be giving the thumbs up for all sorts of things..ditto for Islam...including a favorable review of Qutb, etc.) Not so for the Jewish chapters...(it was with dread, sheer dread, when I discovered I there was a chapter on "Ethics" -- and I had to read the "Jewish" "Ethics" chapter -- I won't repeat what the "commentary" consisted of...but it was hostile.) Anyway, the hostile running commentary (the little "critiques") reminds me of stvip's comments...and it so reminds me of that text I read on Monotheistic Religions with its hostile Jewish chapters... virtually identical...Oh, well...

652 Syrah  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:00:56pm

re: #647 Orde

re: #642 Syrah

What is a "Moderate" Muslim?

Exactly. This is something of an oxymoron, because Islam (as defined by the Quran and Sunnah) is inherently imperialistic and jihadist--but where it is possible to be "moderate" is in the methodology of carrying out the jihad--takfir against other Muslims and violence against infidels now, or jihad through stages of infiltration (diplomatic jihad, propaganda jihad, economic jihad, emmigration jihad, etc) that give the appearance of moderation, when sure, the outward behavior is temporarily more moderate, but the underlying ideology and aim is still extreme. Then there are the many Muslims who adhere to folk Islam of one sort or another, but it's arguable whether or not they are even Muslim, since some of their beliefs and practices go directly against the most fundamental of Islamic teachings, monotheism.

(Good night everyone.)

The Qur'an and the Hadith define Islam. That is the key.

Those Westerners who are calling for a “reformationist” movement to “moderate” Islam into a “kinder, gentler” religion that could live in peace and harmony with the West, misunderstand how religious reformationists movements work.

Reformationist movements seek to “reform” the practice of a religion by returning it to it's original practices and traditions, usually well documented in some original scriptures and texts that anyone can pick up and read and interpret for themselves. “Everyman his own Priest,” according to the reformationist movement in the West, and “everyman his own Imam” in the reformationist movement of Islam.

Islam is currently undergoing a reformationist movement.

The Salafis are the reformers, striving to remake Islam into what it was in the very beginning, by making the Qur'an and the Hadith the centerpiece and cornerstone of Islam in place of the flummery produced by the last 400 years of the Imams and clerics who have accommodated the West's influence on Islamic nations and cultures. The Salafis are also challenging the practitioners of “folk” Islam to purify their faith by returning to the original texts and by rejecting those practices and traditions that do not conform or originate directly from the teachings of the Qur'an and the Hadith.

“Back to the text!” they argue. "Everything else is sin!"

The Salafis argue directly from the Texts. No one can cite Surah or Hadith to discredit Salafism's call to return to the texts.

And that is what makes their reformationist movement real. They see their task as being “to make again” to “reform” Islam into what the Qur'an and the Hadith plainly describe, illustrate, and command.

I hear many people argue that Islam can be “reformed” into some kind of “kinder and gentler” faith. How they propose to do this and retain intact the Qur'an and the Hadith they neglect to say. In truth, they can not leave the Qur'an and the Hadith intact or all of their efforts would be for not. They must burn the Hadith and torch the Qur'an, gutting much of it, reducing the Hadith to a few bland parables and leaving but a few innocuous Surahs between the Qur'an's covers.

It would be easier to shit gold and piss diamonds.

653 Emperor Bob  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:13:33pm

I'm actually happy with this feud of sorts.
I didn't like Fjordman, or "Atlas shrugs" (I blasted her in my second comment ever on this website), and was always uncomfortable with having people here who sided with them. At least now we understand where everyone stands.

Let's face it: the war on terror, and everything that connects to it, constitute a huge issue in politics today; it's attracted its fair share of opportunists.
-The white supremacists will blame it on the Arab-Muslims/Jew-zionists (depending on preference)
-Tancredo will blame the Mexicans
-The left will blame America and capitalism.
-Al Gore will blame global warming
-Ron Paul will blame the first Gulf War and Bush sr, as well as every other thing that has ever existed in this world.
-Fred Phelps will blame homosexuals/God (cause He did it to punish us)
Should we side with all of these? They want to put an end to terrorism, they really do. They just see it differently than we do. Just like Stalin wanted to end Nazism (Okay, that time around, it probably was justified to "ally" with him, as a practical measure, but today, we don't need to bend over for such shitty friends.)

Charles, you have been doing a great job, you focus on facts, pretty much avoid hyperbole, and have generally been able to support the anti-Jihad movement with reasoned arguments, not unintelligible sophistry. Thank you also for taking a defensible position on the problem we face, on not giving your stance on issues that would uselessly divide us (abortion, evolution), and on taking sides when it does actually matter.

Cheer up, people, we don't need them anyways. Tide's already turning.

654 Steel Rain  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:14:21pm

re: #644 Highrise

No, but being self employed I was called away to handle a situation for the last hour and a half. What can I say, it pays the taxes to buy ammo for the troops and monuments to Me for Charlie Wrangel.

As I mentioned earlier I posted contrary to my better judgment. This was due to following the previous thread and this one. I followed this community long before registration was required and thought highly of it. Now it appears have a different opinion is not acceptable to several of you. I'm actually getting riled enough to consider full time posting from here on in.

As a final note, no you did not answer my question. You expressed a negative concerning a facet of one of the options. Okay you won't sit down with Nazi's. Will you sit down with someone who's second cousin twice removed knows a former Nazi? Will you sit down with a member of the European Green Party, knowing the history of what they evolved from and who their previous benefactor was (not Nazi's but with even more blood on their hands over a longer period and just as oppressive in their own way to certain minorities). Will you remain aloof from the whole thing or will you consider nuking from orbit? Better yet, do you have an idea for a better option than the three I named?

655 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:38:06pm

re: #654 Steel Rain

Again you did not answer my question yet again of why you posted that you thought this subject was silly and we needed to move on and that you just were going to leave until we all stopped talking about it and why you keep posting on the topic now. I think that is a pretty valid question.


What part of I will not back nazi's or parties that embrace them didn't you understand? You parsing out your questions to cousins twice removed is just silly...if they are a nazi, I answered that, if that cousin isn't? I don't hold family members background against them unless I see something that looks fishy. If the party has undertones of embracing nazi's, again, I answered that. You can ask this question in many other flavors if you wish. My answer won't change.

If you had been reading on this subject here, many people that are more savvy than I and ARE european have answered these questions of yours. fjordman and his ilk refused to address those answers. Hmm...interesting...I guess aligning with parties that embrace nazism is easier for some. It's time that europe grabs themselves up by the bootstraps and denounce fascism in all flavors if they wish to garner mainstream support. This is really not a hard concept to understand.

I also tend to question over time when someone shows vehemence for a subject or a blog and they try to paint lgfers with some broad brush..I begin to ask, just why is that person here? What motivates them to frequent a blog that they are so riled up about. By all means, keep posting...it may be enlightening....to some.

656 Pim's Ghost  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 9:59:48pm

Oh, come now, there are moderate Muslims. And ones who are not apostates, as well. There are reformers who want to view their religion in much the same sense as (sane) Christians view theirs: not all taken literally and followed to the last letter of the texts/law, no desire for sharia, many who prefer living in the U.S. and consider their allegiance to this country as their home rather than the ummah, many of these things. Plenty of refugees from Iran who are total party freaks who drink and hate the terrorists as much as I do. You have to get out and actually talk to people, let them open up to you, you can easily find Muslims (self-identified) like this all over the U.S. I know, I'm the opposition to the anti-Muslim sentiments online these days, and y'all can bash me for it all you want. But at least consider my thoughts on this situation.

There is Gates of Vienna, where Dymphnomaniac is advocating forced deportations of Muslims from Europe and not disagreeing with other commenters who support the same here and the same here also for Mexicans. I think we all know where "forced deportations" leads to and the amount of supremacy one group must feel over another in order to even jump to that realm of thought.

Then there is Charles here, who is actually standing up to these increasingly radicalized bloggers who are inciting violence. Yeah, I think I'd pick Charles over the self-important elitists who are busy trying to make "ethnic cleansing" sound justified. Wacky me.

P.S. the "Center for Vigilant Freedom" a.k.a. umbrella group for those comfortable with the above mentioned ideas is keeping track of all of the comments here now! Awfully nice of them. So they'll see this, and then Dymphna will write me another creepy email, whatever.

657 Highrise  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:06:09pm

re: #654 Steel Rain

Some more:

I followed this community long before registration was required and thought highly of it, Now it appears have a different opinion is not acceptable to several of you. I'm actually getting riled enough to consider full time posting from here on in.blockquote>

past tense..thought? It almost sounds like you don't think much of LGF now with the word choice you used. I think painting LGF posters with a broad brush that you choose will be interesting to watch and see how people take it. Atleast you are honest :P . I don't agree with you by the way. I see the posters here have many different opinions. Aligning with a nazi tainting group not only goes against common sense of not wanting to be around another fascist group but it goes against what we have seen happen in history. Is that something we wish to repeat? Not me and I'm sure others who do not fit into the nazi's list of likes wish for it to repeat.

Will you remain aloof from the whole thing or will you consider nuking from orbit?

Under what conditions would you do the latter? Can you please explain that option in more detail as to what you mean?

658 Steve Young  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:30:57pm

re: #590 buzzdroid

With all due respect, the same assessment was made of the Nazi Party and their level of popularity around 1930. They too were regarded as bumpkins, and as I recall, some apologists also claimed that members of the Communist party in Germany had infiltrated Nazi ranks in order to discredit them as well. Ironic how history can often repeat itself. I believe the current percentage of Neo-Nazis in Europe that you presented is highly underestimated.

659 gman  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:36:01pm

re: #654 Steel Rain

The "what is acceptable to you?" question keeps popping up when dealing with Fjordman and VB apologists.

You can relativize everything to the nth degree all you want (second cousin twice removed.....), but it does not dismiss the fact that there are lines that need to be drawn in the sand.

A clear message is being sent by Charles that this blog will not affiliate with white supremacist groups or friends thereof.

I love this blog for its strong convictions. I enjoy good dialogue when it is backed up with reason. In fact, if you didn't start out your first post by trying to be divisive I think you would have found people more willing to listen to you.

Here is a snippet from your first posting:
"The whole discussion here is becoming inane. Mr. Johnson owns this blog so he can take any position he wishes though I think he could have handled it differently and not caused any bridge burnings and still maintained his principled stance.

Discussion is useless due to several well meaning zealots who are shouting down everyone else. My own assessment is that one side is to simplistic and the other to trusting with no middle ground for realpolitik (spit) which may unfortunately be called for in this case"


So,you tell us you wish Charles would do things differently then proceed to break some LGF'ers posting in the thread into two categories:simpletons, pushovers.

As Highrise states, "I also tend to question over time when someone shows vehemence for a subject or a blog and they try to paint lgfers with some broad brush..I begin to ask, just why is that person here?"

Steel Rain, are you here for dialogue or to just show your disgust?

660 sultan_knish  Wed, Nov 14, 2007 10:51:52pm

Well I feel stupid, I sat on the fence a bit here but now Brussels Journal has a link to a blog post promoting Ron Paul as the American Paul Belien

[Link: www.brusselsjournal.com...]

And their pro-israel creds go out the window with a link to an article on the Taki site, (Taki is a racist, jailed junkie and obsessive anti-semite)

[Link: www.brusselsjournal.com...]

money quotes from the article linked,

"The livre de scandale of John J Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy, was for me a mostly disappointing read

Unlike the hysteria at the New York Review occasioned by a real iconoclast, Norman Finkelstein, who pulls no punches when going after the German-haters and the Holocaust-exploiters"

To their credit, Walt and Mearsheimer do make respectful references to Pat Buchanan, Robert Novak, and Georgie Ann Geyer as critics of the first Iraqi War, who pointed the finger at AIPAC for fomenting the invasion of Kuwait.

But what makes this lobby especially obnoxious, and this is the one valuable series of revelations in the book, is not only its money and power. It is also the lobby’s arrogance and sheer viciousness, which extends to issues going beyond Israeli security, and which is manifested in its close ties to such shrieking gentile-haters as Abe Foxman and Alan Dershowitz. AIPAC enjoys and cultivates the support of some very unpleasant types, who specialize in maligning those they disagree with. On page after page, the authors document AIPAC’s defaming of politicians such as Charles Percy and Paul Findlay (both from Illinois) who dared to question our “special relation” with Israel. These and other politicians were routinely smeared as “anti-Semites,” and most of them were brought down by the charge

Incidentally, the authors, to their credit, don’t bother to distinguish between AIPAC and its numerous slanderous front organizations, such as the Anti-Defamation League. These groups act in unison not only by backing what the Israeli government, and especially the Israeli nationalist Right, wants but also by wielding what Pat Buchanan has called “the branding iron of the charge of anti-Semitism.”

661 Paul Green  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 12:16:22am

re: #285 Macker

Considering the United States government's use of the Gehlen Organization, Wehrner von Braun, et al., I guess it leaves that outfit out.

662 Suzette  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 3:41:53am

re: #514 Highrise

re: #371 PIERRE_LEGRAND


This hallucination that many of you seem to operate under that the United States was filled with colorful people in this big grand melting pot is a bunch of bullshit.

Negging this post down of Pierre's just didn't seem to do it justice without also posting to say how deplorable this is towards non whites. He's been cruising for a bruising for awhile..Charles is a saint to have put up with him giving him a chance to redeem himself.

Skin color has NOTHING to do with the issues. People can't choose it. How hard is it for white nationalists to understand? It's simple, they don't wish to understand. Taking a trip to the pathetic American white nazi group's homepage sent shivers down my spine when I read the WHO WE ARE page.....

You know, I look white but I just may be a mongrel, I never bothered yet to really look into my past family tree..but I'm always embarrassed by people who put down skin color. There just is no rational basis to act this way. All skin colors I think are actually beautiful and I take pride in the fact that most people DO melt together here in the USA. If anything I take issue with individuals who utterly refuse to follow our laws, attempt to learn our language, flip Americans the bird while living in America....they are ALL different skin colors too I notice that do this stuff which makes it even MORE important that we adhere to laws and not allow special groups any type of special status to their own way of justice. We (USA) need to just maintain and fight for what our forefathers spent blood for...US Constitution.

Highrise I agree with you completely here. I am a mongrel, german, french, Canadian, Indian (Cherokee~great, great grandmother), Irish, and a bit of hillbilly (if that is a blood line~I know it isn't but had to throw it in there!). My basic point here is ...cut any of us, black, white, red, yellow, tan, beige....we all BLEED RED.
No race, creed or whatever has the market of smarts either....I have known and know a lot of brilliant people and a lot of idiots....they come in all shapes, sizes, and colors.
In fact ....according to this theory...which is bunk .... hell let's go by hair color...or eye color, toe nail shapes. It's beyond parody.
I honestly never thought in my lifetime...this would try and start to surface again.
I say shine the light on this vile and actual evil thinking ...it can not stand to be brought into the light, it cannot flourish there.

Charles:
A big thank you! Keep exposing this to the light!

663 gambini  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 3:49:28am

He's well aware of the true ideology of Vlaams Belang et all, and in the bottom of his soul, he supports it. What he's doing here, is spinning the issue, a dishonest chap, that's what he is. Also note how his latest articles have a very Jared Taylorish tone. Take a look at his "White Masochism" essay on GoV.

664 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 4:22:08am

Holy irrelevant whining and smoke blowing, Fjordman.

The more you seethe and spin the more obvious it becomes that you have nothing to come against the facts with, the more apparent it is that at your core you see zero ideological or moral problems with "White Nationalism".

Why don't you admit to that openly and drop the bullshit facade? You still need to be liked by mongrel Jews like me for some reason? You still need to use foolish Jews ?

It is frankly absurd to talk about neo-Nazi connections among this philo-Semitic crowd - Fjordman

You be Philo, I'll be Semitic, OK?

MFer.

665 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 4:45:28am

Oh...Pierre LeGrande again?
Please.

Now I know why I slept all day yesterday.


Survival trumps ideological purity
~ Fjordman


Yet another lie Fjordman.

If the situation were different, if it were MUSLIMS you had to align with in order to save your precious lily white ass
I think maybe you would find your inner hero and die on your feet rather than sell your soul to the Caliphate.

It's a fucking excuse.
Rationalize yourself to yourself
however you want to
it is still bullshit.

It's an excuse from you
and worse than you
it's an excuse from the Vlaams Belang and the BNP and everyone who smells like them worldwide to seize power.

And you know it. And you shill for it.

WTF does that make you?
A survivor?

Good luck with that.

666 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 4:56:37am

A very wise comment at GOV by a poster named Fritz Katz that I am certain will go ignored:


Fjordman,

You quoted the article by James Lewis at the American Thinker...

political_black_ops_in_belgium

The very last paragraph has the solution to this entire arguement:

James Lewis: "So it may be sensible to ask conservatives elsewhere to prove their good intentions, just as we need to demand that the Democrats throw out their totalitarians. Maybe Paul Belien should clarify his position on these issues. Vlaams Belang should clean up its public image, and explicitly denounce suspicious characters. The political benefits of doing that are clear. It is also the right and proper thing to do.

So, just do it! Instead of railing on LGF and other sites that point out the problem -- VB and the SD should make a webpage denouncing "White Power", the Nazis, and all the trappings. Then you could just point to that page and it would take wind out of the sails of all the critics.

I'm sure folks such as Charles Johnson and Babazee would be more than happy to help you guys create such a page.

I've seen Islamists interviewed on TV. They come off spouting "Religion of Peace" claptrap. But if the interviewer specifically asks them to denounce terrorist organizations such as Hamas or Hezbullah -- the mask comes off. They can't do it.

If you specifically denounce them the arguements will be over. Then we can all go join together and get back to fighting the Islamofascists instead of each other.

Fritz ~
They will not denounce them.
And that should further telegraph the truth of the matter to MANY.

667 Roger  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:05:00am

Charles, until Exhibit 1 is addressed, Fjordman won't move on to the question of the object in Dewinter's study. I would have liked to have gotten to it; requesting Dewinter to take a closeup, quality, readable photograph of it and proffer an explanation why, where from and what it means to him. But from day one Exhibit 1 has been in the way for many people including myself. There is nothing more galling to me than the misuse of the Holocaust for political agendas or as a mechanism for cotransporting something wrong along with resolutions on it. It is not a matter of conceivability; it is what politicians do, particularly with obvious resolutions.

The one issue he does address is the Vlaams Belang’s association with Holocaust “minimizer” Jean Marie Le Pen... --CJ

He did address Exhibit 1 earlier:

presented the Vlaams Belang in Belgium as refusing to denounce the Holocaust. The truth is that the European Union is directly responsible for much of the resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe, both by importing Muslims and by appeasing Jihad at home and abroad. The EU hardly cares about live Jews, certainly not about dead ones. The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate and above all for imposing restrictions on free speech for everybody who wants to oppose this project. That’s what the VB objected to in this case.--Fjordman

From the beginning this agrees with my assessment of Exhibit 1. In my opinion Exhibit 1 needs to be out of the way to get to the salient questions Dewinter needs to answer and following researched concerns.

668 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:26:21am

re: #667 Roger

Fjordman won't move on to the question of the object in Dewinter's study.

He won't move on to it in any scenario.

He can't, none of them can, they know damn well what that thing on his shelf is.

I agreed then and still agree that the not signing of the so called Holocaust bill thing was not evidence of anything, as it was designed to make people who did not sign on look like Jew haters, it was designed to stifle opposition to the hard left and Islam, it was a clever piece of evil work, and I said so openly.

No one responded.

NO ONE

669 Former Belgian  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:30:26am

re: #660 sultan_knish

Well I feel stupid, I sat on the fence a bit here but now Brussels Journal has a link to a blog post promoting Ron Paul as the American Paul Belien

[Link: www.brusselsjournal.com...]


I read the post they link to
[Link: therunningdog.blogspot.com...]
and it seem to be quite critical of Ron Jeremy, er, Paul.

As for the "Taki" piece of dreck: what they quote is actually one of his commenters who clearly doesn't agree with the jailbird.

670 Roger  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:41:58am

re: #668 BabbaZee

I asked on LGF & GOV for a quality, readable picture be taken of the thing on Dewinter's study shelf with a full explanation. It should be readily arranged. Albeit there is no incentive for them with Exhibit 1 in the way.

671 Roger  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:48:15am

re: #668 BabbaZee

All the more reason.

672 zygazint  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:48:42am

wtH is a philo semite?

673 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:48:45am

re: #670 Roger

You are kind and good and I am glad you asked there.

However, IMO at this point "exhibit one" is not in the way , it is only a further excuse for them to pretend to be something they are not.

How is it in the way?

I say and have said publicly it is not evidence of anything.

WTF difference should "exhibit one" make at this point to honest people who do not have White Nationalist views stuffed up under their beards, you'd think they would WANT to have Dewinter answer himself for their benefit regarding the Odin's Cross.

They don't need to ask him.
THEY KNOW ALREADY.

They are OK with it.

Exhibit one not withstanding.

What they need is for me to shut up about it already.

Not gonna happen.

674 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:49:22am

re: #672 zygazint

Philo-Semite

675 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:50:15am

re: #671 Roger

re: #668 BabbaZee

All the more reason.


Gotcha

676 zygazint  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:52:46am

re: #674 BabbaZee

re: #672 zygazint

Philo-Semite


meh - that's a nice backhand the F to the N man's got, eh? I don't know why he can't just admit that europe's got a way's to go before they can wash their hands of the nazi influence - it might be 'marginal' in their eyes but what is 'marginal evil'?

677 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:57:12am

BTW this is what I have been reading the last 2 days

I highly recommend it to anyone wanting to understand the religious and faith aspects of the neo nazi white power fascist belief system better.
Because it is a faith , or better I should call it an anti-faith.
As dangerous, as Satanic, as anti-life
as Islamic Jihad.
Perhaps even more so.

678 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 5:59:37am

re: #676 zygazint

I don't know why he can't just admit

Because the most monstrous lies people tell are to themselves. and the more brilliant you are the better you can rationalize evil to yourself and to others.

That's precisely how "nice, smart people" let the first Nazis take power.

679 zygazint  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:01:52am

re: #677 BabbaZee

BTW this is what I have been reading the last 2 days

I highly recommend it to anyone wanting to understand the religious and faith aspects of the neo nazi white power fascist belief system better.
Because it is a faith , or better I should call it an anti-faith.
As dangerous, as Satanic, as anti-life
as Islamic Jihad.
Perhaps even more so.


Thanks for the links BZ - your blog is amazing as is the work you do here - i've learned alot in the past few weeks - what astounds me to know end is how subversive the nazi influence has become to the extent that good people are marginalizing it's influence - but i guess that's how profound evil works.

680 zygazint  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:03:26am

re: #678 BabbaZee

re: #676 zygazint


I don't know why he can't just admit

Because the most monstrous lies people tell are to themselves. and the more brilliant you are the better you can rationalize evil to yourself and to others.

That's precisely how "nice, smart people" let the first Nazis take power.

- astounds me to no end - pimf and yes - i see this quite clearly - it saddens me.

681 Roger  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:03:42am

re: #676 zygazint

It won't ever be washed while Darwin, Huxley, Wallace, etc. are taught and thus continuing Professor Karl Haushofer's evil work.

682 zygazint  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:07:13am

re: #681 Roger

re: #676 zygazint

It won't ever be washed while Darwin, Huxley, Wallace, etc. are taught and thus continuing Professor Karl Haushofer's evil work.

As long as people need a scape-goat and excuses to rationalize their evil - evil will thrive in their hearts.

683 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:08:37am

re: #679 zygazint

Thanks for the kind words

I have literally TONS of stuff yet to post on this problem...
and I intend to continue posting on this subject for the foreseeable future

plenty of people are on to the jihad,
and write on it...
not so many are on to this,
and very few write on it...

So I have to stay with it till someone "bigger" than me starts to handle it regularly.
That may be never, for all I know!
LOL

I didn't want to do this work, I wanted to concentrate on Israel ....

enough are doing that too
says the inner voice

So
it is this I will focus on till further notice!

684 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:10:06am

re: #680 zygazint

Astounds me too.... and I am heartbroken.
Truly heartbroken, by so many over the last few weeks.

685 Roger  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:15:52am

re: #682 zygazint

People yes but the peoples also need to be taught the truth and it doesn't come from the likes of Huxley. Change the ideology and materials people feed on and then give folks time to renew their minds is the only way to assist change for a better way.

686 zygazint  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:16:43am

re: #683 BabbaZee

Thank you for the hard work you do. Charles has chosen his friends wisely, imo. Be careful with your research, btw, those are some nasty creatures you're investigating!

687 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:23:42am

re: #686 zygazint

I know it
I already have a Fatwa, I said to a friend the other day that the Honktwa is 1,000 times more dangerous than the Fatwa

LOL

Seems I have prepared my entire life to fight the Ha Satan,
so off to the battle I ride!

Yippie Kai AYE MFers!

688 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 6:35:16am

I would like to remind all of those reading who are using the "survival trumps a moral stand" justification for fellating evil:


Everybody dies.

It is how you LIVE that matters.

So if any of you imagine you are willing to die at the hands of jihadists (defiantly.. even heroically... like Fabrizzio Quatrocchi)
rather than cede or capitulate to the Caliphate

So you must also be willing to die at the hands of a neo nazi regime or the like if necessary rather than surrender to their version of the Reich.

Otherwise you are not "fighting evil" at all.

You are full of shit.

You are contributing to it.

No mattter what lies you tell yourself.

689 Roger  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 7:12:25am

re: #688 BabbaZee

But where is the roots? It is all around us. Ask any white kid, edumacated in our public schools only, to put a chimpanzee, a blacked skinned person and themselves on a vertical 'evolutionary' scale and see. Missing link not withstanding. The crap is taught at a very early age in our schools; at the age kids don't have discernment and ability to see that chimpanzee skin characteristics are no where nearly the same as a black person's skin. Then ask them then to put a pig[of white orientation], a blacked skinned person and themselves on a vertical 'evolutionary' scale and watch their confusion. We are much closer[by silly sophist style comparisons] to the pig in many ways. (Notice pigs have many skin colors)

Btw, sometimes you don't need to ask; the first answer was voluntarily offered by a kid coming home from school after an indoctrination sophistry session with all its fucking stupid cartoons.

690 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 7:16:27am

re: #689 Roger

But where is the roots? It is all around us.


[insert deep sigh here]
I know.

As I say we fight three evils.
But really they are only one.

And I can not excuse one of the three for expediency's sake

not now
and not ever

691 SR_guy  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 7:23:35am

re: #143 MandyManners
It's not "little" nor is it going away.


I think you're right. This issue is going to get worse. After reading
what 'karmic_inquisitor' had to say, I'm convinced of that.

692 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 7:29:44am
693 billhedrick  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 7:34:02am

joining with the neo-nazis to fight the islamo-nazis is the same as submitting to the islamo-nazis. The only difference is that the devil you are sleeping with is the same color as you.

694 Roger  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 7:42:30am

re: #692 BabbaZeeExactly! Robert Spencer writes the most sound and positive direction post I've read on the issue. Let the pressure work for good, not discord. Time is of value as well as presenting material for people to read and renew their minds or not and prove if they are interested in a better way or not.

695 gambini  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 8:00:34am

It's a pity Robert Spencer's first comment on the issue is as vague as when islamists are asked to condemn suicide bombing.
Well, he said "I disown all neo-nazi and fascist parties".
I would have prefered to hear "I disown Vlaams Belang".
I don't know what keeps him from denouncing the Vlaams Belang, when you look at the facts, they're much worse than Le Pen's National Front.
Very disappointing indeed. Is he afraid to lose support? Have some balls Mr.Spencer, I know you're on our side.

696 gander  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 8:46:55am

There is a rift that will always exist between Americans and Europeans. That is the fact that the United States has always been a multiracial society whereas Europe has historically been racially homogeneous. In the era when America began to move from segregation towards inclusivity, European countries began to move from homogeneity towards racial diversity. I'm not defending racial supremacists in general or Nazis in particular. I'm just saying that things look different from over there just as things look different between the American west coast and the American east coast. Hopefully we will be able to find common ground again.

697 Sharmuta  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 10:19:42am

re: #656 Pim's Ghost

Oh, come now, there are moderate Muslims. And ones who are not apostates, as well.

Not according to the islamists, there's not.

There are reformers who want to view their religion in much the same sense as (sane) Christians view theirs: not all taken literally and followed to the last letter of the texts/law, no desire for sharia, many who prefer living in the U.S. and consider their allegiance to this country as their home rather than the ummah, many of these things. Plenty of refugees from Iran who are total party freaks who drink and hate the terrorists as much as I do. You have to get out and actually talk to people, let them open up to you, you can easily find Muslims (self-identified) like this all over the U.S.

Really? My muslim friends will be surprised to learn I need to get out more. But thanks for the patronization.

I know, I'm the opposition to the anti-Muslim sentiments online these days, and y'all can bash me for it all you want. But at least consider my thoughts on this situation.

I don't know about your sentiments, but I do know I'm not the type to consider an opinion delivered with condescension and arrogance.

P.S. the "Center for Vigilant Freedom" a.k.a. umbrella group for those comfortable with the above mentioned ideas is keeping track of all of the comments here now! Awfully nice of them. So they'll see this, and then Dymphna will write me another creepy email, whatever.

Whatever, indeed.

698 Bob Tail  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 10:38:37am

I completely agree with Charles on taking this stance! It's actually the necessary thing to do in order to keep LGF's sane and apart from the European fascism and Neo-Nazism.

I myself criticized sometimes Fjordman, whom I also enjoyed from time to time reading, long before he's banned from LGF.

699 BabbaZee  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 10:51:14am

Snagglepuss,
Exit! Stage FAR right!

/heavens to murgatroid.

700 Orde  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 10:52:00am

re: #645 J.S.

That's a good but simplified assessment, though I'd add that Wahabis themselves would say Bin Laden is not a Wahabi/Salafi. A book promoted on Salafi websites (such as allaahuakbar dot net) entitled "The 'Wahhabi' Myth" by Haneef James Oliver explains why they do not consider either Bin Laden or the Taliban Salafi.

They also argue that the term Wahabi (after Muhammad Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhaab) has become ambiguous and as you say, derogatory, whereas the term Salafi is self-explanatory, more precise, and free from misinterpretation, since it clearly means followers of the ways of the Salaf (the first 3 generations--i.e., the Prophet & his companions, plust the followers of his companions, plus the followers of the followers of his companions).

701 Sharmuta  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 11:05:57am

re: #700 Orde

They also argue that the term Wahabi (after Muhammad Ibn 'Abdul-Wahhaab) has become ambiguous and as you say, derogatory

Indeed. The wahhabis prefer to be called "unitarians".

702 J.S.  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 12:31:12pm

re: #700 Orde

From what I understand they (Salafists) don't like the term Wahhabi (or consider it derogatory) because it suggests that they are followers of a person (not Allah)...like followers/worshippers of a saintly person (which is shirk for the Sunnis)...a kind of idolatry...(also, btw, the terms used by the academic were "High Islam" at the core/center and "Folk Islam" at the periphery/edges/frontier regions of Islam.)

703 Steel Rain  Thu, Nov 15, 2007 4:43:45pm

re: #657 Highrise

Feel free to email me. Hell I'll even give you my office phone number if you're serious about having a discussion instead of a confrontation. This thread is rapidly aging.

704 Sharmuta  Fri, Nov 16, 2007 7:46:05am
Read Fjordman’s whole screed for yourself, and then take a look through the volumes of factual evidence I’ve posted, and ask why Fjordman, Gates of Vienna, and Brussels Journal are spending so much time blowing smoke and personally attacking me, instead of addressing the facts.

Sometimes it can be painfully ugly to watch another person's defense mechanisms in action. I've found in life that usually the thing that motivates one's self the most is usually one's self. Now- of course it's instinct to defend one's self, but that's not what these euro-bloggers are doing. They attacked Charles, and he's refuted them with his evidence- which they ignore, yet continue to attack him for posting. They are angry they've been exposed and are lashing out instead of looking at themselves- like a blow to the ego of a narcissist knocking them out of their self-grandeur- belittling the threat is the main m.o. to restoring the self back to the preconceived notions of self importance.

It can be a very sobering moment when you realize the person you're dealing with is manipulating you for whatever personal end. Sometimes you realize this too late- and you've been screwed. Sometimes you're able to spare yourself. But always the manipulators wear a mask. We're lucky when the mask slips, and blessed when we see it when still firmly in place.

705 konservo  Fri, Nov 16, 2007 1:40:37pm

re: #704 Sharmuta


Sometimes it can be painfully ugly to watch another person's defense mechanisms in action.

I've been wondering why so many commenters say that Fjordman's analyses are high quality and insightful. I've read some of his recent posts on women and 'white masochism' and I've found them repulsive and uninformed pieces of garbage. The attacks on LGF and Charles have been equally irrelevant, as they are filled with pointless ad hominem arguments and avoid the questions that have been raised.

If Fjordman is truly the insightful thinker that people say he is, he's sure doing a good job of hiding it these days.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

Blockbuster Total Access Two Week Trial
More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Remember it's still a believe system.