I love my country

Touche`

For something like this, it strains credibility that a low-level secretary would handle something like this. It would imply a level of incompetence that would disqualify one from being anywhere near the oval office

So, who are your friends there, Charles? ;)

I refuse to believe that Hatem El-Hady is a real name.

Nice work Charles. Keep those roosting chickens busy.muwahahahahaha.

"Friends," Romans, and Countrymen, lend me your spears.

Michelle as first lady?

Swiftboating! Guilt by association! Hackers! Strawman! It was the 60's, dammit!

/anticipating the excuses

re: #9 stevieray

Out of context! My personal fave.

I don't know diddly about 'friend' networks, but is it possible that when El-Hady registered, Michelle Obama was automatically popping up on everybody's list? Like Tom what's-his-face at Myspace?

Otherwise, I think it's darned spiffy that you took the time to do some checking into the whole thing.

They will say it's a staffer. When the questionnaire detailing Barack's extreme views on guns and other issues came out, he said a staffer filled it out even with his handwriting on it.

And the press bought it. Why wouldn't they buy that a staffer was in charge of the networking site?

Charles is always AT LEAST one step, many times two and three steps ahead of his prey. People foolish enough to tangle with him do well to internalize that.

Well done Gorn.

re: #5 seether

I refuse to believe that Hatem El-Hady is a real name.

His real name is Hadme At-Hello.

Hugh Hewitt is playing a bunch of Wright sermons.....

MOTS (more of the same)

...and add to that, Hugh Hewitt is broadcasting new "sermons" (very disturbing) from Rev. Wright.

NObama!

"Hate 'em" in the Lincoln bedroom?

and it is obama's friends all the way around that makes me very nervous about the guy

as well as the favors that friends expect

re: #15 jcm

re: #16 IslandLibertarian

Six seconds...

Barrack and Michelle Hatem America

As if anyone was foolish enough to question you.

re: #10 vagabond trader

Out of context! My personal fave.

when someone says that i always ask," OK, what would it look like if it were in context?"

facial tones vary from intense red to bleach white...

The Audacity of Scrutiny.

And it was the first time in her life she'd been really proud of her web presence.

re: #20 Noam Sayin'

re: #16 IslandLibertarian

Six seconds...

it's the old "6 degrees of separation" thing.

Charles, before we start slinging mud, consider that many people use nics of their favorite heroes. I have seen it in LGF and other blogs. Just because the nic reads Michelle Obama doesn't mean the person was actually Michelle Obama. You have seen the same at leftest blogs using your name as their nic to inflame the members.
It is interesting how fast the web page has been deleted though......

Just back off while I eat my waffle!

re: #24 Sharmuta

I would ding you up 100 points for that if I could.

That is a GREAT rotating title.

"Some people have suggested that I was incorrect when I said"

Hell, not me !

How many hate monger friends do Barrack and Michelle have to have before the MSM gets a clue and calls them on it? The list literally grows every week.

And with friends like Mr. Wright, who keeps his mouth running full time on TV, Obama has got to be wondering how many more will begin to make a fool of him.

re: #11 Cognito

And all this time I thought Tom was my one true friend..

re: #27 LoFlyer

Charles, before we start slinging mud, consider that many people use nics of their favorite heroes. I have seen it in LGF and other blogs. Just because the nic reads Michelle Obama doesn't mean the person was actually Michelle Obama. You have seen the same at leftest blogs using your name as their nic to inflame the members.
It is interesting how fast the web page has been deleted though......

one would imagine the candidates wife's name used as a nic would be scrutinized. Nope. not buyin' it...

re: #33 paxnhymn

one would imagine the candidates wife's name used as a nic would be scrutinized. Nope. not buyin' it...

Could be why it was removed so quickly.
Repudiation is the purest form of flattery.

re: #26 IslandLibertarian

it's the old "6 degrees of separation" thing.

Need a shower after listening to Wright Wrant.

re: #34 theparson

Could be why it was removed so quickly.
Repudiation is the purest form of flattery.

BEFORE a person would be allowed to use it dubiously...

Pass the Blueberry Syrup, Please...

re: #24 Sharmuta

Could you do me a small favor, and meet me in the lounge?

And buzzsawmonkey too, if you're still here.

re: #35 jcm

Every time I hear "Goddamm America" I think of the Union Dead at Gettysburg.

Then I have to stop myself from thinking things that I couldn't post here.

re: #27 LoFlyer

Charles, before we start slinging mud, consider that many people use nics of their favorite heroes. I have seen it in LGF and other blogs. Just because the nic reads Michelle Obama doesn't mean the person was actually Michelle Obama. You have seen the same at leftest blogs using your name as their nic to inflame the members.
It is interesting how fast the web page has been deleted though......

You missed the point -- the person who sends the invitation has to know the person's email address.

Hadme som-Jello

re: #40 Charles

You missed the point -- the person who sends the invitation has to know the person's email address.

What about the possibility of an auto-friend, a la Tom at Myspace?

Is it possible that was a policy that's since been discontinued?

Either way, it doesn't look good for Obama.

re: #38 abolitionist

//elitist

Charles,

You should invite Michelle Obama and see if she accepts.

re: #32 Q-Burn

And all this time I thought Tom was my one true friend..

Tom's a tramp. He'll hang with anybody.

re: #28 DesertSage
You are going to gain weight from eating all those waffles. lol

re: #35 jcm

Need a shower after listening to Wright Wrant.

Write said he was taken out of context.
When you hear the entire sermon there is no doubt that he is an American hating bigoted racist.
I lost count of the "lily-white" and "rich-white" pejoratives.
The man HATES white people!

NObama!
NObama!
NObama!
NObama!
NObama!
NObama!

re: #40 Charles

You missed the point -- the person who sends the invitation has to know the person's email address.

So, can you mass email the LGF database and ask them to be your friends?

/that would be pretty funny if you just registered today over there and tomorrow suddenly have like 10K friends, they might ask you to start bundling money or something

#47 PIMF
I meant to wright "Write".....uh, er, no, I mean wrote Wright.....aw crap, you better know what I meant.........

re: #47 IslandLibertarian

Write said he was taken out of context.
When you hear the entire sermon there is no doubt that he is an American hating bigoted racist.
I lost count of the "lily-white" and "rich-white" pejoratives.
The man HATES white people!

NObama!
NObama!
NObama!
NObama!
NObama!
NObama!

Chickens coming home to roost in context is even more damning.

re: #42 Cognito

What about the possibility of an auto-friend, a la Tom at Myspace?

Is it possible that was a policy that's since been discontinued?

Either way, it doesn't look good for Obama.

I don't know; it doesn't seem very likely that Obama's wife would be automatically added to everyone's page.

That sounds a little ... unseemly.

re: #52 Charles

I don't know; it doesn't seem very likely that Obama's wife would be automatically added to everyone's page.

That sounds a little ... unseemly.

Maybe thats what made her proud... of her, you know... country.

re: #51 jcm

Chickens coming home to roost in context is even more damning.

must be a time delay, just heard about "dem chickens" (Pun intended)

Lizards,

Hugh Hewitt is going to post the audio files in awhile.

re: #11 Cognito

I don't know diddly about 'friend' networks, but is it possible that when El-Hady registered, Michelle Obama was automatically popping up on everybody's list? Like Tom what's-his-face at Myspace?

Which still leaves the question: Why would her name have suddenly disappeared from the list, not long before the whole page was pulled?

Remember that it was Michelle Obama who invited Bill Ayers to be a part of forums on which her husband participated.

re: #56 Fat Jolly Penguin

Which still leaves the question: Why would her name have suddenly disappeared from the list, not long before the whole page was pulled?

"gotcha" moment...

Ahh...the plot thickens...

re: #56 Fat Jolly Penguin

Which still leaves the question: Why would her name have suddenly disappeared from the list, not long before the whole page was pulled?

It fits the pattern. When something is noticed...
backpedal.

re: #59 intifan

Ahh...the plot thickenssickens...

How about we check how many Jewish websites Michelle Obama is listed as "a friend."

Still waiting...

Please note: this also implies that Michelle Obama knew Hatem El-Hady.

re: #45 stevieray

Tom's a tramp. He'll hang with anybody.

So Tom's a tramp and Michelle's a.....

I am so disillusioned...

re: #11 Cognito

I don't know diddly about 'friend' networks, but is it possible that when El-Hady registered, Michelle Obama was automatically popping up on everybody's list? Like Tom what's-his-face at Myspace?

Otherwise, I think it's darned spiffy that you took the time to do some checking into the whole thing.

That's one of the reasons we love this site. Charles both knows his stuff, and he cares about fact checking.

Wright Wrants... 9/11 sermon.

Black people jumping.....

re: #62 ted

How about we check how many Jewish websites Michelle Obama is listed as "a friend."

Still waiting...

Maybe she would be a friend of Jews for Hitler.

The world is nuts.

re: #55 jcm

Hugh Hewitt is going to post the audio files in awhile.

Good thing Hugh's a lawyer.

/seeing as how the church sells DVDs of those sermons, this might possibly not go over well

Michelle has been Pwned

Better yet, Liz-Pwned!

re: #52 Charles

I don't know; it doesn't seem very likely that Obama's wife would be automatically added to everyone's page.

That sounds a little ... unseemly.

I dunno, Hillary's spouse seems to fit that bill....

/just sayin'

U.S is an "arrogant racist military superpower"
Rev. Jeremiah Wright

NObama!

re: #68 Killian Bundy

Good thing Hugh's a lawyer.

/seeing as how the church sells DVDs of those sermons, this might possibly not go over well

Wright wanted his sermons put into context...
Be careful what you axe for.

BAWHAHAHA!

re: #66 jcm

Wright Wrants... 9/11 sermon.

Black people jumping.....

jumping ship hopefully. I still think this is all about that hateful narcissist elevating himself to Sharpton / Jackson popularity...
another pig at the "racism" trough...

re: #52 Charles

I don't know; it doesn't seem very likely that Obama's wife would be automatically added to everyone's page.

That sounds a little ... unseemly.

Of course- befriending a terrorist thug is in and of itself unseemly, but I have to agree with you. Hard to auto-friend if an invitation and confirmation have to take place.

re: #40 Charles

Umm, looks like you got me on that one. I just know things are not what they always what they seem on the 'net. They sure did pull her name and the web-page in a hurry though....

re: #67 MigueldowninMexico

Maybe she would be a friend of Jews for Hitler.

The world is nuts.

For some reason, when I saw your 'jews for hitler', I heard "springtime for hitler, in Germany' in my head....

I'm having bad Deja Vu...

when I close my eyes and listen, so much of what's said about Barack sounds like the same things said about the people & circumstances surrounding Bill... & at the time I thought he could never be elected once, let alone twice.

Michelle, you smell,
You and Hatem go together well, my Michelle.
Michelle, you smell,
What's your friend el-Hady tryin' to sell, my Michelle.
Barack Hussein Obama,
That's all I've got to say,
I'll vote for him no way,
But in case I do I'm telling you so you'll understand,
My Michelle.

re: #73 paxnhymn

jumping ship hopefully. I still think this is all about that hateful narcissist elevating himself to Sharpton / Jackson popularity...
another pig at the "racism" trough...

I'm not so sure. Sharpton and Jackson seem to be simple opportunists to me. Wright, he's a true believer in this crap. The Black Liberation Theology....I'm telling you.

re: #76 bikermailman

For some reason, when I saw your 'jews for hitler', I heard "springtime for hitler, in Germany' in my head....

I don't know that one, is it a song?

re: #80 MigueldowninMexico

I don't know that one, is it a song?

I think it was a Mel gibson movie....

re: #79 bikermailman

I'm not so sure. Sharpton and Jackson seem to be simple opportunists to me. Wright, he's a true believer in this crap. The Black Liberation Theology....I'm telling you.

it still increases the $$ comin' into the coffers...money talks.

re: #81 LoFlyer

I think it was a Mel gibson movie....

I see.
I love Mel Gibson's movies lol

Back in 1976, Gerald Ford gave a clumsy answer in a debate with Carter to the effect that Eastern European countries were "free". It was quickly lampooned as a gaffe from the clueless candidate.
Today we have Ayers, Wright, "mean" Americans, no pride in her country, "bitter" religious nuts and I've probably forgotten some dumb statements, and the guy keeps going.
Time's have changed.

re: #74 Sharmuta

Of course- befriending a terrorist thug is in and of itself unseemly, but I have to agree with you. Hard to auto-friend if an invitation and confirmation have to take place.

Watch them blame this on a nefarious Republican scheme - someone pretending to be Michelle Obama and they deleted it once they 'discovered' the plot.

re: #81 LoFlyer

Springtime for Hitler

re: #61 theparson

Good one!

re: #81 LoFlyer

I think it was a Mel gibson movie....

The more I think of it, its Mel Brooks, my bad....

re: #80 MigueldowninMexico

I don't know that one, is it a song?

It's part of the movie The Producers, a hilarious Mel Brooks movie.
link

It helps to know the plot of the movie first...puts the video linked above in perspective.

When I last looked, Michelle Obama has 233 friends, most of whom seem to be campaign operatives like precinct captains and whatnot. Is the friend thing mutual? If I make you my friend, with your acceptance, does that automatically make me yours?

Oh, and the notion that Michelle Obama has a doppleganger on the Obama campaign website is a stretch.

The conservatives are NOT in the minority. There are conservatives in both parties. Obama will never be president. Even if he's elected. That is a sad statement to make, but true.

re: #81 LoFlyer

I think it was a Mel gibson movie....

Springtime for Hitler? Get out. It was a Mel Brooks movie.

re: #82 paxnhymn

it still increases the $$ comin' into the coffers...money talks.

True....he was verrryyy good to the church, they built him a million dollar house as a retirement gift.

I can trace my christian heritage to the pastor of one the early Protestant Churches in Kent England. I am the first male in several generations not a minister. My heritage, and where I currently attend politics is off the table.

A person in correct spiritual state will make political decisions according to God's will.

Politics need not be preached from the pulpit. We do pray for ALL of leaders, that they be guided, we don't even pray for a specific conclusion, other than God's will.

re: #18 Teacake!

and it is obama's friends all the way around that makes me very nervous about the guy

Hiya, Teacake! Long time no see.

re: #83 MigueldowninMexico

I see.
I love Mel Gibson's movies lol

He's pulling your leg. It was from a Mel Brooks movie. lol!

McCain may be the Obamas' last friend if he keeps losing friends at this rate. pmffff.

Mel Brooks...one of my favs!

re: #97 mikeinmd

McCain may be the Obamas' last friend if he keeps losing friends at this rate. pmffff.

They may have a whole lot of time commiserating with each other over failed opportunities at the rate that both are going.

re: #88 LoFlyer

The more I think of it, its Mel Brooks, my bad....

You made my evening. lol!

re: #97 mikeinmd

McCain may be the Obamas' last friend if he keeps they keep losing friends at this rate. pmffff.

PIMF

re: #90 Powderfinger

If I make you my friend, with your acceptance, does that automatically make me yours?

I'm not sure, but I doubt it. A good social networking system uses a strict opt-in model and doesn't automatically add you to anything.

re: #91 4wheel

The conservatives are NOT in the minority. There are conservatives in both parties. Obama will never be president. Even if he's elected. That is a sad statement to make, but true.

What is that supposed to mean?

re: #99 lawhawk

They may have a whole lot of time commiserating with each other over failed opportunities at the rate that both are going.

True that. It's like he's trying to get me to NOT vote for him....again.

re: #88 LoFlyer

The more I think of it, its Mel Brooks, my bad....

Don't worry. I meant I love Mel Brooks films LOL

I love Mel Gibson's films too.

/How about a thread on The Passion of The Christ?

:p

re: #96 rightymouse

He's pulling your leg. It was from a Mel Brooks movie. lol!

I know who he was talking about lol
I just went with the wrong name too.

re: #105 MigueldowninMexico

Don't worry. I meant I love Mel Brooks films LOL

I love Mel Gibson's films too.

/How about a thread on The Passion of The Christ?

:p

How about "Gallipoli" considering that today is Australia's Anzac day and Mel Gibson was in that movie?

re: #105 MigueldowninMexico

Don't worry. I meant I love Mel Brooks films LOL

I love Mel Gibson's films too.

/How about a thread on The Passion of The Christ?

:p

THERE'S a good idea... After the Pope thread? I don't think so. :P

re: #105 MigueldowninMexico

Don't worry. I meant I love Mel Brooks films LOL

I love Mel Gibson's films too.

/How about a thread on The Passion of The Christ?

:p

I'll leave that up to Charles, Haven't seen a new movie since the last Star wars flick... (I need a life!)

re: #106 MigueldowninMexico

I know who he was talking about lol
I just went with the wrong name too.

You bad. lol!

I don't believe in atheist holidays...
Atheists push 'humanist' holidays

The Institute for Humanist Studies, an Albany, N.Y.-based nonprofit, is calling attention to its calendar of atheist holidays on its Web site, [Link: www.secularseasons.org....] The group wants nonbelievers (or at least noncelebrators) to have a handy reference guide of the calendar of holidays honoring free thinkers, banned books and nature, among other themes.

re: #86 Killgore Trout

Springtime for Hitler

Such a funny video LOL

re: #85 rightymouse

Watch them blame this on a nefarious Republican scheme - someone pretending to be Michelle Obama and they deleted it once they 'discovered' the plot.

I think they'll have a hard time pulling that off- I think they'd notice a rouge Michelle Obama out there.

re: #107 rightymouse

How about "Gallipoli" considering that today is Australia's Anzac day and Mel Gibson was in that movie?

Oh that's a good idea.
Congtratulations to Kangarros and Kiwis ;)

re: #103 VegasRick

What is that supposed to mean?

I did a double-take as well. i don't think he was implying something unmentionable; i think he means more like a powerless lame-duck type fighting a hostile Congress....I hope that's what he means.

Christians 'should wear veil'

OUTSPOKEN Muslim cleric Taj Din al-Hilali says the Bible "mandates" the wearing of the veil by Christian women.

Writing in a new book, Sheik Hilali, who lost his job as mufti of Australia after comparing scantily clad women to uncovered meat, argues that the Bible and the Koran make similar demands of a woman's modesty.

/must have missed that verse

re: #112 MigueldowninMexico

It's really a very funny movie. Gene Wilder is great in it.

re: #113 Sharmuta

I think they'll have a hard time pulling that off- I think they'd notice a rouge Michelle Obama out there.

You mean she's blushing?

re: #114 MigueldowninMexico

Oh that's a good idea.
Congtratulations to Kangarros and Kiwis ;)

Darn, my mezcal intake is showing.
I'd rather sign off for a while.
Good bye and God bless all :)

re: #52 Charles

I agree with you Charles. Using such a high profile name would be scrutinized.

And, using Occam's razor:

...one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything...

I believe you have busted Michelle Obama and her associate Hatem El-Hady.

re: #110 rightymouse

You bad. lol!

lol ;)

re: #102 Charles

Ah, a good opt-in model. Right.

This would be the same bunch that apparently had Obama's pages redirect to Hillary's website?

Some supporters who tried to visit the community blogs section of Obama's site started noticing late last week they were being redirected to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's official campaign site.

Security researchers said a hacker exploited a so-called "cross-site scripting" vulnerability in Obama's website to engineer the ruse.

Netcraft Ltd. said the hacker injected code into certain pages in the section - code that was then executed when subsequent visitors tried to view the community blogs section. The vulnerability has since been fixed.

While the hack appears to have been a prank, researchers said the breach underscored that candidates risk exposing their supporters to computer viruses and identity theft if they don't secure their websites. For instance, a similar mechanism could be employed to redirect campaign site users to a site that steals personal information from visitors.

Looks like Hugh Hewitt has numerous recorded sermons of the Rev. J. over at Townhall.com. I just downloaded about 3 hours worth. Doubt if I can make it thru all that. Bad for the anger management.

re: #113 Sharmuta

I think they'll have a hard time pulling that off- I think they'd notice a rouge Michelle Obama out there.

Maybe.

[Link: my.barackobama.com...]re: #97 mikeinmd

McCain may be the Obamas' last friend if he keeps losing friends at this rate. pmffff.

Obamas not listed as a friend on McCain's page. Just GWB. Notice also Michelle O isn't there.

re: #117 Killgore Trout

It's really a very funny movie. Gene Wilder is great in it.

The fox from Le Petite Prince?
;)

He's good!

Charles, as one of the people who asked for clarification on how the friend process over there worked, thank you for your usual above-and-beyond the expected investigation.

re: #111 Killgore Trout

That just screams "bad idea". I dread to think what holidays they could come up with.

re: #121 MigueldowninMexico

lol ;)

Bwahahahaha!

re: #123 rawmuse

Looks like Hugh Hewitt has numerous recorded sermons of the Rev. J. over at Townhall.com. I just downloaded about 3 hours worth. Doubt if I can make it thru all that. Bad for the anger management.

He played a lot on his show.
Wright wanted context...
He got it.

re: #91 4wheel

The conservatives are NOT in the minority. There are conservatives in both parties. Obama will never be president. Even if he's elected. That is a sad statement to make, but true.

Even if he's elected, he won't be president?
How does that work?
Am I reading something sinister into your post?

re: #105 MigueldowninMexico

Don't worry. I meant I love Mel Brooks films LOL

I love Mel Gibson's films too.

They should work together on something!

Young Jesusstein?

Ok Good bye now.
*POOF*

Mouse ;)

Both of the Obama's and their 'friends' will continue to be the gifts that keep on giving until 9 PM PST Nov. 2 when he goes down faster than a prom dress.

re: #113 Sharmuta

I think they'll have a hard time pulling that off- I think they'd notice a rouge Michelle Obama out there.

Forgot to say that she'd be the one with the bright red cheeks? :)

/sorry...it's late...

re: #123 rawmuse

Sure, but think of how much closer to God you will be...you know, the God that Damns America.

re: #125 x-ray

lol, ok.

re: #111 Killgore Trout
Darwin Day is proposed for Feb. 12. ha

re: #123 rawmuse

I just tried listening to a few minutes, and his voice is really hard to take after 60 seconds.

re: #133 MigueldowninMexico

Ok Good bye now.
*POOF*

Mouse ;)

See ya...have to go couchular with my family now. :)

re: #120 Ledger1

I agree with you Charles. Using such a high profile name would be scrutinized.

And, using Occam's razor:

...one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything...

I believe you have busted Michelle Obama and her associate Hatem El-Hady.

How did he happen to be named "Hatem"? Granted Mohammad was probably already used, but "Hatem" does have a few negative connotations in the English language. Sounds like what L. Ron Hubbard would of named one of his villains in his "Fortune of fear" book series...

re: #102 Charles

I'm not sure, but I doubt it. A good social networking system uses a strict opt-in model and doesn't automatically add you to anything.

Right, but if you opt in to being my friend based on an invitation I've extended to you, does the software make it a mutual friendship? I honestly don't know as I avoid such things like the plague. Any myspace/facebook denizens in the house?

re: #127 guzziguy

Charles, as one of the people who asked for clarification on how the friend process over there worked, thank you for your usual above-and-beyond the expected investigation.

Is it possible that Michelle Obama just accepts everyone as her "friend"?

Except "typical white person"(s)?

re: #135 rightymouse

/sorry...it's late...

You're telling me! Spell check doesn't catch correctly spelled pimfs.

re: #131 IslandLibertarian

Even if he's elected, he won't be president?
How does that work?
Am I reading something sinister into your post?

maybe 4whell means it like the lefties do when talking about GWB ,,, "he's not MY president" !

re: #141 LoFlyer

How did he happen to be named "Hatem"? Granted Mohammad was probably already used, but "Hatem" does have a few negative connotations in the English language. Sounds like what L. Ron Hubbard would of named one of his villains in his "Fortune of fear" book series...

I'm guessing it's pronounced hah teem.

Pi day. Y'know, that only applies in the weird areas of the world where dates are written with the month before the day.

I mean, you have three numbers, which change at different rates. One every day, one every 28-31 days and one every 365 days. So how do you arrange them? Logical order perhaps, something to do with how fast they increase?

/Makes no sense

re: #141 LoFlyer

Hatem is the anglicized version of the Arabic word for seal, signet ring, stamp- (Khhtim).

At the Obama site, you invite people to be your “friend,” by entering their address into a form. The person who receives the invitation then chooses to accept or reject the invitation. If they accept, they’re listed on your page.

This means that Michelle Obama agreed to have her name listed on Hatem El-Hady’s now-vanished web page, unless she has a secretary who makes decisions like that for her—which I doubt.

Mr Spiffy rises from his wing-backed over-stuffed chair, "I say, Home slice. Were you able to deduce all of that from the way Mrs. O**** walked up the stairs to you rooms?"

"Not at all my good Spiffy. They articulate their desires every day"
He looked at Spiffy and said,"One needn't be a Sherlock Holmes to figure that out"

Well, well well, you just can't tell

well well well my Michelle

re: #144 Sharmuta

You're telling me! Spell check doesn't catch correctly spelled pimfs.

Was teasing ya, hon. :)

Gotta go now. Later.

New at zombietime:

Full-length UPDATED final three-part report about the April 9 Olympic Torch Relay in San Francisco.

Now with videos and 3x the number of photos!

re: #143 brainwizard73

Is it possible that Michelle Obama just accepts everyone as her "friend"?

Except "typical white person"(s)?

I suppose anything's possible. But, the bHo site has had previous problems with members who caused some embarrassment. They would have to be very foolish to simply accept everyone. If I went over there and authored a page titled "Stalin was my best friend" do you suppose M.O. would click to accept me as her friend? And, I'd have to know her email address.

re: #152 zombie

New at zombietime:

Full-length UPDATED final three-part report about the April 9 Olympic Torch Relay in San Francisco.

Now with videos and 3x the number of photos!

and 100 less calories !

re: #141 LoFlyer

How did he happen to be named "Hatem"? Granted Mohammad was probably already used, but "Hatem" does have a few negative connotations in the English language. Sounds like what L. Ron Hubbard would of named one of his villains in his "Fortune of fear" book series...

Muslim: from an Arabic personal name, ?Hatim, literally ‘decisive’ or ‘determined’. ?Hatim al-Ta?iy (died 605) was a personage living in Arabia immediately before the rise of Islam, famous for his benevolence and hospitality. The name is popular throughout the Muslim world.

re: #150 RememberSekhmet?

Well, well well, you just can't tell

well well well my Michelle

Now, how'd I know that was what was coming from that link? Awesome album....one of my top ten best albums, front to back.

re: #152 zombie

New at zombietime:

Full-length UPDATED final three-part report about the April 9 Olympic Torch Relay in San Francisco.

Now with videos and 3x the number of photos!

{ZOMBIE}

re: #152 zombie

Hola Zombie.

re: #138 snowcrash

I wonder what a Darwin day card from Hallmark would be like.

Hatem: 2. Dutch: habitational name from a place in Gelderland.
/Princess Bride Reference

re: #153 guzziguy

Maybe Michelle Obama is easy...in an internet "friend" sort of way.

How big a check do you think the average jihadist has to write to get MO on his friend list...and she refuses to wear the burqa, too. Wow!

re: #148 jaunte

Hatem is the anglicized version of the Arabic word for seal, signet ring, stamp- (Khhtim).

Well I would suggest he change his name to
"Seal", he might gain a few fans....

re: #152 zombie

New at zombietime:

Full-length UPDATED final three-part report about the April 9 Olympic Torch Relay in San Francisco.

Now with videos and 3x the number of photos!

New, and improved!

re: #116 Killian Bundy

Christians 'should wear veil'

/must have missed that verse

Yep, that would be along the same lines as the whole issue about women being saved through childbearing. Drats for me, since I'm a childless, middle aged, single woman!

Some folks don't get the whole cultural context v timeless truth thing.

Hatem.....I, Hatem......just hard to get my brain around that.

re: #159 Killgore Trout

I wonder what a Darwin day card from Hallmark would be like.

Darwin again!
Dude, you gotta shake that monkey off your back... so to speak.

I am in favour of Yuri Day. Or Cosmonauts day for anyone who speaks Japanese. Then again, anyone who knows what Yuri Day would probably be in Japanese might be favour of it...

/Oh wait, this isn't ace of spades...

re: #163 LoFlyer

I guess 'decisive' is a good description for what a 'seal' is supposed to do.
I prefer the singer Seal, too.

re: #159 Killgore Trout

You have to write it and fold it yourself.

I love this:
“I think it is very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States ... I think that the people should understand that I will be Hamas’ worst nightmare,” McCain said when asked about the group’s recent statements about Obama.

Power to the Correct People!
(They know how to scare their enemies.)

re: #167 theparson

I was responding to Snowcrash.

re: #170 jaunte

heh.

re: #141 LoFlyer

I don't know.

Spelling of certain foreign names can have odd structures.

re: #175 Ledger1

I don't know.

Spelling of certain foreign names can have odd structures.

yes ,, likre Achmed the dead terrorist,,,
A ,,,,,,,C ,,,,, Phlegm ,,,,,, M ,,,, E ,,,,, D,,,,,,

re: #169 jaunte

I guess 'decisive' is a good description for what a 'seal' is supposed to do.
I prefer the singer Seal, too.

With a name like Hatem you can bet the FBI will never investigate his background. Now if he was named "Billy Bob" he would be on the 10 most wanted list...

re: #159 Killgore Trout

I wonder what a Darwin day card from Hallmark would be like.

Since you're reading this at least we've established that you survived...

re: #174 savage_nation

Zom gave me a hat tip for helping get a couple of those videos to work on youtube

Thumbs up!

re: #152 zombie

Do you know why there are so many Burmese in San Francisco?
/I know it sounds like a joke setup, but I am curious.

re: #152 zombie

New at zombietime:

Full-length UPDATED final three-part report about the April 9 Olympic Torch Relay in San Francisco.

Now with videos and 3x the number of photos!

Woot! More Zombie reports at Zombietime!

Careful! McCain might tell you that you are disconnected from reality!

Here's a better holiday idea...
Cedar Park church helps ease gas price burden

As part of its "Faith in Action Weekend," members of Highpoint Fellowship Church have struck a deal with an Exxon station to sell gas for $2.49 a gallon on Sunday, April 27.

They've actually bought down the price in order to help people who are struggling because of the high gas prices.

re: #174 savage_nation

Zom gave me a hat tip for helping get a couple of those videos to work on youtube

Can I ask what magic you did? My attempts were futile.

re: #178 slokat

Ha!

re: #182 nihilist

Careful! McCain might tell you that you are disconnected from reality!

DRINK!

re: #177 LoFlyer

Billy-Bob El-Hady has a ring to it.
(I had a friend in college named Rocky Anawaty).

The cheap gas is only available between the hours of 10 a.m. and 1 p.m.

Should be a lot of available seats for the morning service.

re: #188 jaunte

Billy-Bob El-Hady has a ring to it.
(I had a friend in college named Rocky Anawaty).

wow ,, I once dated a college cheerleader that said I could do anawaty I wanted too !

What!?!

That's not my email address. I don't even know that person Hatem El-Hady. This type of thing is really not my bag, baby!

M.Obama

re: #184 rawmuse

Can I ask what magic you did? My attempts were futile.

He went to to the YouTube office lobby, and when they would help said...

"I'll be back."

When they saw what he drives they were more helpful.

re: #193 jcm

He went to to the YouTube office lobby, and when they would help said...

"I'll be back."

When they saw what he drives they were more helpful.

PIMF...
NOT HELP.

re: #190 sattv4u2

Sounds like she had a few too many!

re: #183 Killgore Trout

Here's a better holiday idea...
Cedar Park church helps ease gas price burden

There ya go - that's "church" the way it was meant.

I was befuddled a number of years ago when I came back to the US for a Christmas break (as a missionary in Thailand) and the ladies' group was proposing picketing at the local theater for showing the Harry Potter movie. After listening to their claims of how evil it is, I innocently asked, "How about going down to Nashville and taking blankets and cups of hot soup to the folks who are living under the bridge?" I got no response other than how evil magic is.

re: #115 paxnhymn

I did a double-take as well. i don't think he was implying something unmentionable; i think he means more like a powerless lame-duck type fighting a hostile Congress....I hope that's what he means.

Me too.

re: #183 Killgore Trout

Here's a better holiday idea...
Cedar Park church helps ease gas price burden

Dangit, this is blocks from my house and I just filled up for $3.39!
Did you notice the intersection... New Hope and Bagdad...

re: #192 savage_nation

I converted all the vids into the flv format. I used this converter.

Works like a charm...

Eggggggscellent!

re: #125 x-ray

[Link:

re: #196 jaunte

Sounds like she had a few too many!

a few too many what ,,, guys !?!?!?!?!?!

I hope you all have a great evening. Time for me to go.
Don't take any wooden nickels.
Goodnight, Mrs Callabash... wherever you are.

re: #197 Intrepid

It seems to be coming back into fashion. I posted a spinoff last week about a church that was selling frozen chickens extra cheap. I put up a spinoff yesterday about a church in England that was getting a liquor license to have a small pub.

re: #204 Killgore Trout

It seems to be coming back into fashion. I posted a spinoff last week about a church that was selling frozen chickens extra cheap. I put up a spinoff yesterday about a church in England that was getting a liquor license to have a small pub.

No kidding ! Wow - Little WInger may be interested in something like that ! LOL

michelle o. is a very unstable person. she so readily courts disaster regarding her husbands run for potus. her anger clouds rational thought. she needs some therapy to deal w/ her self loathing and embarrassment of riches issues. she appears to be so blessed, by most people's standards, and yet her belligerence and crass personality show her to be a truly miserable woman. she has never appeared to be happy, kind, thankful or generous of spirit. four yrs. of this awful person would be unbearable.

re: #31 svines

How many hate monger friends do Barrack and Michelle have to have before the MSM gets a clue and calls them on it? The list literally grows every week.

And with friends like Mr. Wright, who keeps his mouth running full time on TV, Obama has got to be wondering how many more will begin to make a fool of him.

The same number as the number of women that Bill Clinton had to molest, assault and sc---." It will never happen. Because once they admit that number 10 is over the line - they'd essentially be admitting that they were wrong the whole time. The narcissism of the press means they can't bring themselves to do it.

re: #207 nyc redneck

michelle o. is a very unstable person. she so readily courts disaster regarding her husbands run for potus. her anger clouds rational thought. she needs some therapy to deal w/ her self loathing and embarrassment of riches issues. she appears to be so blessed, by most people's standards, and yet her belligerence and crass personality show her to be a truly miserable woman. she has never appeared to be happy, kind, thankful or generous of spirit. four yrs. of this awful person would be unbearable.

Michelle Obama's complete absence of warmth and lack of self-deprecating humor are also big red flags for a toxic personality.

If and when his presidential bid fails, look for these two to either get divorced - her idea - or for him to cheat on her - obviously his idea.

re: #204 Killgore Trout

It seems to be coming back into fashion. I posted a spinoff last week about a church that was selling frozen chickens extra cheap. I put up a spinoff yesterday about a church in England that was getting a liquor license to have a small pub.

I read a book a number of years ago written by Colonel Donner, who was right there on the front lines of the beginning of the religious right back in the late 1970's. But he broke from them when they became so totally focussed on abortion and not enough of what he saw was the real calling of the American church - showing compassion and helping the poorest of the poor so that they could eventually help themselves.

Dang, I wish I still had that book. Don't even know the name of it!

re: #125 x-ray

Obamas not listed as a friend on Just GWB.

Think GWB has rescinded that friend listing after the Katrina comments?

/ Darn, my first reply got screwed up.

Hatem all-Hatey

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

too. funny. for. words.

re: #195 savage_nation

w00t!

{ Savage Nation } Hope you are ok man!

Spengler, on what Michele is all about.

Sad and ugly, I'm afraid.

This is the kind of stuff that should be on Rush, O'Reilly and Hannity over and over. And I love to see Obama blame them or Charles for pointing that out. It's like Nixon blaming the Watergate on Woodward and Bernstein.

Al Gore gets no respect:

Since the Civil War only four Democrats -- Jimmy Carter, Lyndon Johnson, Franklin Roosevelt and Samuel Tilden -- have won a majority of the popular vote. (Tilden in 1876, lost the Electoral College vote and never became president.)
It has been 32 years since a Democrat won a majority of the popular vote. The last to do so was Carter, who won a whopping 50.1 percent of the votes in 1976. He defeated Republican incumbent Gerald Ford, the man who pardoned Richard Nixon and carried the burden of Watergate and the Vietnam War into the election. [Link: www.charlotte.com...]

KT: This cards for you

[Link: www.cafepress.com...]

It's sad how you can't seceded in life , because of the way you were raised!

re: #10 vagabond trader

Out of context! My personal fave.

I also love Wright's defense of his disgusting words: "soundbites"

How long does a "soundbite" have to be before it becomes a "quotation"?

re: #13 Sol Roth

Charles is always AT LEAST one step, many times two and three steps ahead of his prey. People foolish enough to tangle with him do well to internalize that.

Well done Gorn.

"Gorn"! I love it! Don't mess with the Gorn, suckers.

re: #219 Promethea

I also love Wright's defense of his disgusting words: "soundbites"

How long does a "soundbite" have to be before it becomes a "quotation"?

When somebody takes Rush's comments like the "phony soldiers" comment and twists it from being about the likes of Jesse whatshisname and/or Scott Beuchamp to being about any soldier who criticizes the war -- That's taking things out of context.

When somebody finds example after example of hate speech and black separatist speech in the sermons of the Pastor of a church to which a leading candidate for president belonged. Statements that are not repudiated by said Pastor and can in no way be found to be about anything other than hating whitey and hating Amerikkka, that's not taking something out of context -- that's presenting the position statements and worldview of said Pastor.

/silly liberals, how is this so hard to understand?

re: #85 rightymouse

Watch them blame this on a nefarious Republican scheme - someone pretending to be Michelle Obama and they deleted it once they 'discovered' the plot.

Karl Rove was behind this.

/

re: #91 4wheel

Obama will never be president. Even if he's elected.

Care to clarify?

re: #67 MigueldowninMexico

Maybe she would be a friend of Jews for Hitler.

The world is nuts.

Hey there Migueldownin Mexico! :) How ya been?

re: #111 Killgore Trout

I don't believe in atheist holidays...
Atheists push 'humanist' holidays

This is getting Belgian. Secular humanism in Belgium actually has the status of an "officially recognized religion" (which in practice means things like the state pays salaries for their "clergy").

They also have a whole calendar of holidays and rites of passage ("festival of spring"/"lentefeest", "festival of the secular-humanist youth"/"feest der vrijzinnige jeugd",...)

Charles has stared straight in the face of the devil on many occasions. Unfortunately, it comes with the territory.

This is the same thing I said about the fact that anybody can create an account and consequently a blog at my.barackobama.com, and how it does nobody any good to make baseless claims such as, "Oh, if it's on Obama's site, he must condone it!" when in fact LFG itself has been trashed numerous times undeservedly by left-wing blogs for the same kind of radical commentary here, despite the fact that it had nothing to do with Charles. I found it plainly hypocritical (despite whatever claims you want to make about the differences in the expediency of moderation at the respective sites) for us to then condemn a political opponent for what someone writes on their website without their knowledge. For that I got flamed innumerable times and think I was at least -20 in post ratings.

But yet again, I think it's clear that some sort of bizzarre political blood lust has taken hold and has been guiding the discourse here over the past few months. And I'm sad to see LGF joining into the guilt-by-association 'gotcha' game the left is so good at. Perhaps it would be best to actually focus on real issues from now on, rather than who does what on whose website, lest we shoot ourselves in the foot again.

For the record: I'm not saying anything about the accuracy of Charles' reporting, but simply that I don't think this is the best way to vet candidates or debate the actual issues.

C'mon people. It was no threat or conspiracy. Just a view from the room. I hope I'm wrong.

re: #5 seether

I refuse to believe that Hatem El-Hady is a real name.

I wonder if that could be ol' Dougie?

re: #227 Eri

As Buzz would say, naw, naw, naw...

Listen, it is of the utmost importance to know the company our next President keeps.

For the record, the remaining candidates have all been exposed as it relates to people who are in close quarters with them,

Quite frankly, it is only the folks like Charles, Malkin, and those similar who have actually looked at legitimate questions not being asked by the MSM who should all along be doing this job.

re: #228 Eri

What exactly do you think the actual issues are? Does the personal beliefs of the person running for the president of the most powerful nation on earth not factor in to your theory? If not, why not? How does the fact that this person associates with racists and terrorists NOT matter? I'd really like to know.

re: #223 Palandine

Sure. Care to think?

For those that did not see my earlier post, I made a statement that even if Obama were elected, he'd never be president. I was misunderstood immediately. I'd never advocate violence against whomever was elected the president of our country, As a matter of fact, I would never speak ill about whomever was elected president of our country no matter what party they were affiliated too. (Unlike a lot of miscreants that troll this site). All I'm saying is, most sane people see Obama for what he is, which is a very large threat to this country. A lot of insane people see this also. Just because they're insane doesn't mean they're secular progressives.

re: #227 Eri

A presidential candidate's wife has a friend who is a former chairman of a Hamas-connected group that was shut down by the government, and you don't think it's important?

Are you for real?

re: #235 Charles

No. Eri is NOT for real. Think about that.

HEY POWDERFINGER if you're around.

re: #228 Eri

For the record: I'm not saying anything about the accuracy of Charles' reporting, but simply that I don't think this is the best way to vet candidates or debate the actual issues.

What's the "BEST WAY" Eri?

Eri told us his agenda in this comment:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

re: #228 Eri

For the record: I'm not saying anything about the accuracy of Charles' reporting, but simply that I don't think this is the best way to vet candidates or debate the actual issues.

I tend to think Obama's wife being a friend of Hamas is, in fact, an "actual issue" in this election. A huge one.

I don't know, Charles, it's always good to have a healthy amount of skepticism...while this whole matter is most certainly shady, it's probable that 1) she doesn't handle the account personally or 2) she accepts all friend requests as a gesture of friendliness.

I'm just saying I wouldn't place my bet on something re: #239 Charles

Eri told us his agenda in this comment:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

What exactly is that supposed to mean? That I actually want a Republican candidate who is conservative on important issues like immigration, judicial appointments, size of government, etc.?

If all we as Republicans (assuming you are one) can do to confront the Democrats on the fundamental issues this country faces is to find befriended user pages on their websites and yell "Lookie!", the Republicans will not and probably should not win in November.

I'd much prefer a Republican party of solutions and ideas rather than this type of nonsense. That's why McCain is at least smart enough to debate Obama on the issues and not on what his Pastor said in a sermon.

If you are going to play the guilt-by-association game, you're going to have to run the same kind of pieces on McCain's associations with people like John Hagee, who I'm sure you are well familiar with.

I'm not here to troll, just to say this isn't what articulate conservatives should be about. I guess that's my radical "agenda".

re: #242 Eri

You didn't address ANY of the questions that were asked of you. Getting defensive isn't a response. It's just defensive.

Excellent Charles, thanks for all the work you do to get us information.

re: #242 Eri

What exactly is that supposed to mean?

It's pretty simple and pretty obvious what it means. You said you despised John McCain so much you would rather see a Democrat elected. So you're shilling for Barack Obama. No mystery there.

re: #242 Eri
I'd much prefer a Republican party of solutions and ideas rather than this type of nonsense. That's why McCain is at least smart enough to debate Obama on the issues and not on what his Pastor said in a sermon.

If you are going to play the guilt-by-association game, you're going to have to run the same kind of pieces on McCain's associations with people like John Hagee, who I'm sure you are well familiar with.

I'm not here to troll, just to say this isn't what articulate conservatives should be about. I guess that's my radical "agenda".

So many problems, so little time. First: it is NOT guilt by association when one questions Obama's association with "Pastor" Wright. This is because, by Obama's and Wright's own admissions, Obama has been a member of Wright's congregation for nigh 20 years now. And these aren't just isolated quotes that are disturbing - it is Wright's entire philosophy (though some call it theology). Wright's very beliefs, is "interpretation" of Christianity is racist and classist. He makes comments about "declaring war on the health care system that leaves poor people behind" and on a failed education system. It is an inherently political philosophy that masquerades as a theology - and this is the church Obama chose to attend for 20 years.

Not only that, but the first speech write gave that so inspired Obama, according to Obama's own memoirs (he has TWO already?) was inherently racist, as the sermon blamed whites for all of the poverty and need in the world ("a white man's greed that creates a world in need," or words to that effect).

There are two options here: either Obama believes this stuff, or he staid in the church to get street cred. Either way, I think it is very telling. Add that up with Obama's consistent, and radical, leftist positions and voting record, and I think he is incredibly frightening. If a racist (or racially cynical), marxist is someone you'd rather have in the White House than McCain because there are some things wrong with McCain's positions (I don't think the potential judicial nominees is one of them. Making unwarranted compromises as a Senator is one thing, choosing the candidates is another), or some of them, is inane, to say the least.

Hillary, we know, is a proven liar and sketchy, at best. Obama, to be honest, actually frightens me more. He doesn't even have the good sense to try to *act* centrist. Great speaker my arse. He doesn't even know how to play the game. Why the hell would you want THAT guy instead of McCain? Except out of a "I'm not getting exactly what I want, so I'm taking my ball and going home" mentality.

the sinner,

Charles

#242 Eri

If you are going to play the guilt-by-association game, you're going to have to run the same kind of pieces on McCain's associations with people ....

Such as Charles Riegle, Dennis DeConcini, Alan Cranston & John Glenn?

But intellectual Republicans can rest assured that, as POTUS, McCain will continue to effect solutions based upon ideas such as what brought about McCain-Feingold and McCain-Kennedy, to name but two.

Then, there's his full embrace of al-Gore's 'global warming' hoax.

John McCain, the Left's best choice for 'conservative' leadership. Maybe he'll tap Bernie Sanders to be his running mate.

Or, Jean-Pierre.

To conclude my thought (a bit of transient dyslexia with preview/post buttons ;-), McCain leaves much to be desired. But for the post-Modern Bolshevik Revolution, we could write-off this cycle and do a bit of rebuilding.

But, unless there's a massive trainwreck, McCain will be sworn in next year. He'll be better than the Contessa, but by how much?

re: #242 Eri

Eri You've been at LGF since 8/2007 which tells me a) you haven't been here long enough to have read the plethora of topics and threads Charles provides regarding the subjects which the useless-MSM refuse to cover; or b) you're a nitpicking troll with a grudge against LGF and Charles in particular.

Either way, grow up and READ MORE. It's ruddy obvious you haven't done your homework and your post shows it.

If you support Obama, I feel sorry for you but don't put on some other ridiculous ideological "garb" and traipse around like you know classic liberalism (today's conservativism) and then tell people you are so disgruntled that you would rather see a Dem in office. You'r a troll. And you want BHussein as president.

That said, you and your "yes we can" "I can change the world" groupthink of emptysuit worshippers will be sorely disappointed in November.

I hope you don't mind, but I just have to say "well said there LeonidasOfSparta!"

Wow. Gotta get those screenshots!

Isn't there a habit of things disappearing off of Obama's website? I can't recall exactly but this seems awfully familiar. Oh, oops, I forgot, he's all about change.

Nevermind...

This means that Michelle Obama agreed to have her name listed on Hatem El-Hady’s now-vanished web page, unless she has a secretary who makes decisions like that for her—which I doubt.
And please note: this also implies that Michelle Obama knew Hatem El-Hady

Can we modify that to "knows" and "approves" of Hatem El Hady?

People can make mistakes with friends and aquaintances whom they shared company with, but if after a while they find out they are something else and disassociate themselves, and don't look back, we say, okay, live and learn.
But what's going on with the Obamas and their radical buddies is different. Obama's responses about Ayers were a dodge - "I was eight years old ..." Yeah, no one argues with THAT, but that wasn't the correct answer to "Why are you associating yourself with him NOW, when he is still an unrepentent anarchist radical not sidelined - sitting in his barca-lounger clacking his dentures and blah-blabbing all day for any random drop-in visitor - but active on boards and organizations that don't like one bit the USA of A in its free-market republic governance state of being? Obama's a lawyer by training, his reply was not spontaneous, his parsing was very deliberate - he didn't answer the question - he replied with a non sequitur question. He didn't lie, but only because he didn't answer the question put to him.
Michelle Obama is campaigning so that she can become First Lady. She should have been appalled her name showed up on as a "friend" of Hatem. Yank it and scream bloody murder, whatever necessary to broadcast she wants nothing to do with him. But that's not what happened. A silent vanishing act instead.
But evidently, she's got a problem, obviously SOME people would LOVE to have the Obama's associated with the likes of Hatem, so for SOME people that's a big plus. For the rest, it's a collossal negative, and a warning of extreme danger ahead. Guess they are very used to posting all sorts of stuff in plain view, because few outside the Black Liberation Theology and NOI heard about it or thought it was relevent. It is now. They are moving to make the jump to national power levers. It's very very relevent now.
Any decent secretary has the bosses' best interests at heart and if Michelle's name showed up on a site a hypothetical secretary or assistant knew would be detrimental, thus would advise it never be put on it, or get it hauled off ASAP, whatever. But if Obama's staff prefectly reflects her, then ... well. Given the base bile and bigotry the Obamas soothingly to deliver in polished, perfect and highly educated accents, then any employee of decency and fair-mindedness would leave soon after finding out what kind of people they really are. Therefore, they all approve, but are a bit slow to realize they have moved beyond their echo-chamber. They'll fix that soon enough.

re: #249 LeonidasOfSparta

Eri You've been at LGF since 8/2007 which tells me a) you haven't been here long enough to have read the plethora of topics and threads Charles provides regarding the subjects which the useless-MSM refuse to cover; or b) you're a nitpicking troll with a grudge against LGF and Charles in particular.

Either way, grow up and READ MORE. It's ruddy obvious you haven't done your homework and your post shows it.

If you support Obama, I feel sorry for you but don't put on some other ridiculous ideological "garb" and traipse around like you know classic liberalism (today's conservativism) and then tell people you are so disgruntled that you would rather see a Dem in office. You'r a troll. And you want BHussein as president.

That said, you and your "yes we can" "I can change the world" groupthink of emptysuit worshippers will be sorely disappointed in November.

1) I've read LGF since 2003 but never registered because of sheer lack of time. Yet, I have read and continue to read it most every day and have commented positively on numerous topics here. On most topics posted here, I agree fully.

2) That being said, I find it funny (and telling) how anytime someone expresses a point-of-view even slightly different from the masses here, they are attacked personally and dismissed as a "nitpicking troll" or someone who is "shilling for Obama." And of course, the mandatory "grow up" comment must also be served.

3) I do not support Obama. I've been a conservative and registered Republican since age 18. But apparently you've decided that because I don't find anything worthwhile in attacking someone for who posts what on their website, I must be a closet Obama-loving CAIR-supporting liberal shill. It's like rabid McCarthyistic idiocy all over again.

4) To Charles: I never once said I "despised" McCain, so I think you're clearly misconstruing my words. This was pre-Super Tuesday and I stated that I'd be voting for Romney. I said McCain was a "misrepresentation" of the Republican party and that I was "not sure" whether I'd support him as the Republican nominee. That's much different than saying I "despised" him.

re: #254 Eri

By the way, I've been registered over a year, not merely since 8/07.

Here are your exact words:

A President McCain would destroy the Republican party. I will vote for Romney. If McCain is the nominee, I still am not sure whether I'd support him. I think it'd be better to have a Democratic president that can cause the Republicans to unite (ex. the Republican Revolution of '94) than a misrepresentation of the party in a leader like John McCain, who would basically ruin it.

Yup. Don't see the word "despise" there. My observation was purely political.

re: #257 Eri

Yup. Don't see the word "despise" there. My observation was purely political.

Excuse me for jumping to the conclusion that you despised him, just because you said he would destroy the Republican party. Quite a leap, I have to admit.