LGF

more options

  

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register (closed) Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)
You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

now playing

Recently Played

Advertisement

Reading links...

  

Link address:
Link title:
Description: 
Remaining:

Obama Waffle Watch

Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:39:00 pm PST

It’s illuminating to compare the statement on diplomacy with Iran that’s been on Barack Obama’s campaign web site for months...

Diplomacy: Obama is the only major candidate who supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions. Now is the time to pressure Iran directly to change their troubling behavior. Obama would offer the Iranian regime a choice. If Iran abandons its nuclear program and support for terrorism, we will offer incentives like membership in the World Trade Organization, economic investments, and a move toward normal diplomatic relations. If Iran continues its troubling behavior, we will step up our economic pressure and political isolation. Seeking this kind of comprehensive settlement with Iran is our best way to make progress.

... with the ridiculous waffling and arugulaing going on now:

OBAMA HAS BEEN CONSISTENT THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “PRECONDITIONS” AND PREPARATION, THAT HE WOULD NOT SIT DOWN AS PRESIDENT WITH HOSTILE LEADERS WITHOUT HAVING DONE “THE APPROPRIATE GROUNDWORK”

[Hey, easy on the bold caps, please. We hear you. – ed.]

Obama: Initial Meetings With Hostile Nations Would Start With Lower Level Aides; Bush Admin “Preconditions” Are Exactly What Need to Be Negotiated In These Meetings. Asked whether his idea of meeting with hostile nations consisted of “from the get-go of the President of the United States” or lower level aides, Obama said, “The latter. Understand what the question was. The question was a very specific question. Would you meet without preconditions? Preconditions as it applies to a country like Iran for example was a term of art. Because this administration has been very clear that it will not have direct negotiations with Iran until Iran has meet preconditions that are essentially negotiations with Iran until Iran has met preconditions that are essentially what Iran used and many other observers would view as the subject of the negotiations. For example, their nuclear program. The point is that I would not refuse to meet until they agree to every position that we want. But that doesn’t mean that we would not have preparation, and the preparation would involve starting with low level-lower level diplomatic contacts, having our diplomatic corps work through with Iranian counterparts, an agenda. But what I have said is that at some point I would be willing to meet. And that is a position, I mean, what’s puzzling is that we view this as in any way controversial, when this has been the history of U.S. diplomacy, until very recently. This whole notion of not talking to people, it didn’t hold in the ‘60s, it didn’’t hold in the ‘70s, it didn’’t hold in the ‘80s, it didn’’t hold in the ‘90s, against much more powerful adversaries; much more dangerous adversaries. I mean, when Kennedy met with Khrushchev, we were on the brink of nuclear war. When Nixon met with Mao, that was with the knowledge that Mao had exterminated millions of people. And yet we understood that we could advance our national security interests by at least opening up lines of communication. And this was bipartisan. And it’s a signal of how badly our foreign policy has drifted over the last eight years; how much it has been skewed by the rhetoric of the Bush Administration that this should even be a controversial proposition.” [Obama Press Avail, 5/15/08]

Obama: “Obviously There’s a Difference Between Pre-Conditions and Preparation.” Asked if he were still willing to meet without pre-condition during your first year with Fidel Castro, Kim Jung Il, Hugo Chavez, Obama said, “I do. Now, I did not say that I would be meeting with all of them. I said I’d be willing to. Obviously, there is a difference between pre-conditions and preparation. Pre-conditions, which was what the question was in that debate, means that we won’t meet with people unless they’ve already agreed to the very things that we expect to be meeting with them about. And obviously, when we say to Iran, ‘We won’t meet with you until you’ve agreed to all the terms that we’ve laid out,’” from their perspective that’s not a negotiation, that’s not a meeting.“ [Meet the Press, 11/11/07]

Obama Said There Was A Difference Between Preparation And Preconditions. The Kansas City Star reported, ”’The argument was that I would invite Hugo Chavez over to my house, and we’d pop open a beer and we’d start talking...That’s the lack of preparation. There’s no one that would meet another head of state without preparation. Preconditions refer to something specific. We’ve refused to talk to Iran until they meet preconditions.’ Obama admitted that his willingness to try a new approach to foreign policy was his way of rocking the political boat. ‘I’ve been trying to challenge some conventional wisdom.’“ [Kansas City Star, 8/20/07]

Obama: Nobody Expects You Would Meet with Hostile Leaders Without Having Done the Appropriate Groundwork. Obama said, ”Nobody expects that you would suddenly just sit down with them for coffee without having done the appropriate groundwork,“ he said. ”But the question was: Would you meet them without preconditions? And part of the Bush doctrine has been to say no." [Washington Post, 7/27/07]

Good grief. Can you say, barrage of BS?

281 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, addresses, or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

#1 Shug 5/19/08 5:39:30 pm 0

Leave my waffle alone!

#2 livefreeor die 5/19/08 5:39:47 pm 0

Mmmm...waffles.

#3 Shug 5/19/08 5:41:01 pm 2
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “PRECONDITIONS” AND PREPARATION, THAT HE WOULD NOT SIT DOWN AS PRESIDENT WITH HOSTILE LEADERS WITHOUT HAVING DONE “THE APPROPRIATE GROUNDWORK”

"Preparation for Hostiles"

Preparation H for short

#4 buzzsawmonkey 5/19/08 5:41:29 pm 7

What is the difference between a Corrie pancake and an Obama waffle? Little square pockets of ambiguity.

But the syrup is the same.

#5 song_and_dance_man 5/19/08 5:41:47 pm 0

I don't believe much of what B. Hussein says, much less his surrogates.

#6 LoneStarLizard 5/19/08 5:41:50 pm 8

So you could say he was for negotiating with the Iranians before he was against it.

#7 Sharmuta 5/19/08 5:41:52 pm 3

That's so nuanced my eyes glazed over. Or maybe it's the waffle syrup.

[deleted] 5/19/08 5:42:29 pm 6
#9 yochanan 5/19/08 5:42:42 pm 0

what is the differences between pancakes and waffles?

#10 song_and_dance_man 5/19/08 5:43:18 pm 8

Forget the U. N. we know have B. Hussein's International House of Waffles.

#11 song_and_dance_man 5/19/08 5:44:06 pm 4

re: #9 yochanan

what is the differences between pancakes and waffles?

One goes under a Cat and the other a bus.

#12 jcm 5/19/08 5:44:23 pm 2

The Dali Bama says Iran's not a threat.If

Iran ever tried to pose a serious threat to us, they wouldn't stand a chance. And we should use that position of strength that we have to be bold enough to go ahead and listen. That doesn't mean we agree with them on everything. We might not compromise on any issues, but at least, we should find out other areas of potential common interest, and we can reduce some of the tensions that has caused us so many problems around the world."

Don't worry, be happy.
/

#13 anotherindyfilmguy 5/19/08 5:44:29 pm 2

re: #9 yochanan

what is the differences between pancakes and waffles?

People like it when politicians pancake...

#14 Occasional Reader 5/19/08 5:44:39 pm 0

It depends on the meaning of the word "is"...

#15 Grammy Cracker 5/19/08 5:44:50 pm 0

He was for it before he was against it? Or was he against it before he was for it?

There's not enough maple syrup in the WORLD to sugar-coat this crap!

/Good Evening, Lizards!

#16 Mars Needs Neocons 5/19/08 5:45:03 pm 2

This clown is the worst tool in the shed. He's speaking on TV right now here in my town, wish the hell I was still heading the college republicans I would have set up one hellacious protest. Including giant waffle signs and a direct request for him to respond to the racist hate crap on Kos earlier today.

I still cannot believe some 60's lefties created this sob 30 years ago. I didn't think radical lefties could think that far ahead (though with their world socialism plans I could have misjudged)

#17 Sharmuta 5/19/08 5:45:14 pm 11

Boy- poor obama. This iranian issue is really becoming quite the "constant sore" for him.

#18 Occasional Reader 5/19/08 5:45:25 pm 9

As mentioned in the previous thread; I am currently eating dinner... eating AS MUCH AS I WANT... and I did not seek permission from other countries! bwaahahahaha

#19 song_and_dance_man 5/19/08 5:45:43 pm 2

B. Hussein doesn't think Iran is much of a threat because he's a greater one.

#20 jaunte 5/19/08 5:45:50 pm 0

This guy is going to get us all taken to the cleaners if he gets his chance.

#21 Shug 5/19/08 5:46:02 pm 7

re: #15 Grammy Cracker

He was for it before he was against it? Or was he against it before he was for it?

There's not enough maple syrup in the WORLD to sugar-coat this crap!

/Good Evening, Lizards!


He was for it and against it at the same time, and it is racist to criticize this effort to bring together both for and against.

Change!

Hope!

[deleted] 5/19/08 5:46:08 pm 0
#23 astronmr20 5/19/08 5:46:22 pm 0

I thought he ate pancakes?

#24 livefreeor die 5/19/08 5:46:32 pm 0

re: #11 song_and_dance_man

One goes under a Cat and the other a bus.

LOL!

#25 BignJames 5/19/08 5:46:42 pm 0

He can't expect to have all the waffles he wants without somone complaining....or something.

#26 Occasional Reader 5/19/08 5:46:49 pm 0

re: #22 savage_nation

Well, share some, you racist punk!

I'll have to ask France first.

[deleted] 5/19/08 5:47:35 pm 0
#28 HelloDare 5/19/08 5:47:52 pm 2

Obama bin Waffles

#29 Alouette 5/19/08 5:47:52 pm 0

I'm proud to live in America where I can eat as many waffles as I want.

#30 Grammy Cracker 5/19/08 5:48:06 pm 0

re: #21 Shug

He was for it and against it at the same time, and it is racist to criticize this effort to bring together both for and against.

Change!

Hope!

Thank you for clearing up my confusion! I'm sure it is the result of a lifetime spent clinging to my God and my guns....

HOPE! CHANGE!

#31 gop_patriot 5/19/08 5:48:26 pm 6
Asked whether his idea of meeting with hostile nations consisted of “from the get-go of the President of the United States” or lower level aides, Obama said, “The latter. Understand what the question was. The question was a very specific question.

Condescending.

Would you meet without preconditions? Preconditions as it applies to a country like Iran for example was a term of art.

WTF does that mean?!? UGH Progressives and their imaginary made up meanings for words. "term of art", right. Moron.

#32 Occasional Reader 5/19/08 5:48:29 pm 2

re: #27 savage_nation

Sacre bleu!

I checked. My sharing food with you did not pass THE GLOBAL TEST.... so, sorry.

#33 Mars Needs Neocons 5/19/08 5:48:45 pm 0

I've lost track am I a typical white person because I cling to guns and religion or is it because I'm supposed to be a racist.

#34 mean Gene 5/19/08 5:49:27 pm 0

re: #4 buzzsawmonkey

What is the difference between a Corrie pancake and an Obama waffle? Little square pockets of ambiguity.

But the syrup is the same.

Audacious pockets of ambiguity.

#35 lorien1973 5/19/08 5:49:31 pm 0
But the question was: Would you meet them without preconditions? And part of the Bush doctrine has been to say no.

Doesnt this imply that Barack's answer would be "yes" ?

#36 livefreeor die 5/19/08 5:49:32 pm 1

re: #33 Mars Needs Neocons

I've lost track am I a typical white person because I cling to guns and religion or is it because I'm supposed to be a racist.

Yes.

#37 astronmr20 5/19/08 5:49:33 pm 0

re: #29 Alouette

Not for long, if this joker gets elected.

Waffle rations are-a-comin'.

#38 Roentgen 5/19/08 5:50:02 pm 1

re: #33 Mars Needs Neocons

I've lost track am I a typical white person because I cling to guns and religion or is it because I'm supposed to be a racist.

Yes.

#39 Nevergiveup 5/19/08 5:50:04 pm 0

This asshole acts as if the EU's negotiations with Iran for the last 5 years never happened. Is he stupid or just ignorant or both?

#40 Mars Needs Neocons 5/19/08 5:50:16 pm 0

Damn this guy wants all the waffles, and he'll determine who gets the syrup and when.

#41 kenprice 5/19/08 5:50:32 pm 9

There is a word in Spanish: "Cantinflar". It means to talk a lot, and say absolutely nothing that makes any sense. BHO has taken Cantinflar to new oratorical heights. Worse, people hearing him think they know what he's saying. Total, absolute bullshit!.

#42 Occasional Reader 5/19/08 5:50:39 pm 0

re: #35 lorien1973

Doesnt this imply that Barack's answer would be "yes" ?

Obama also bravely declared today that George W. Bush "will not be on the ballot" in November.

Change!

#43 livefreeor die 5/19/08 5:50:43 pm 1

re: #37 astronmr20

Not for long, if this joker gets elected.

Waffle rations are-a-comin'.

To be followed by waffle riots. Oh, the humanity.

#44 Grammy Cracker 5/19/08 5:51:08 pm 0

re: #22 savage_nation

Well, share some, you racist punk!

I can't share my food....'allgone', as we say to the dogs....but I will share my wine. Better now?

#45 song_and_dance_man 5/19/08 5:51:29 pm 0

B. Hussein's preparations - Should I take my PJ's in case Mahmoud wants me to go camping?

#46 mean Gene 5/19/08 5:51:39 pm 0

re: #41 kenprice

There is a word in Spanish: "Cantinflar". It means to talk a lot, and say absolutely nothing that makes any sense. BHO has taken Cantinflar to new oratorical heights. Worse, people hearing him think they know what he's saying. Total, absolute bullshit!.

He's a ''framer'' rather than an explainer.
He let's all of his listeners fill in the picture.
Of course each one fills it in differently, but who knows that?

#47 Tangonine 5/19/08 5:51:39 pm 7

I'm watching his speech from a replay from today on C-SPAN.

Some girl asked if he'd subsidize her education for law school.

He replies: "yes, of course! if you're going to be a public defender... but not if you're going to be a corporate lawyer..."

So apparently getting government subsidies under Barrack Hussein Obama depends entirely on you making the "right" political decisions.

what a fking dirtbag.

#48 anotherindyfilmguy 5/19/08 5:52:00 pm 0

re: #42 Occasional Reader

Wouldn't it be funny if Bush beat both McCain and Obama in the general election without even running? Guess he'd have to pick a successor then...

[deleted] 5/19/08 5:52:02 pm 0
#50 FrogMarch 5/19/08 5:52:08 pm 0

re: #41 kenprice

There is a word in Spanish: "Cantinflar". It means to talk a lot, and say absolutely nothing that makes any sense. BHO has taken Cantinflar to new oratorical heights. Worse, people hearing him think they know what he's saying. Total, absolute bullshit!.

I notice his supporters do the same thing. flowery lofty language signifying nothing.

[deleted] 5/19/08 5:52:20 pm 1
#52 ZardozZ 5/19/08 5:52:21 pm 0

I guess his brand of waffling is what he calls CHANGE !

#53 jcm 5/19/08 5:52:30 pm 3

re: #19 song_and_dance_man

B. Hussein doesn't think Iran is much of a threat because he's a greater one.

He only see's the objective threat.
USSR had 20,000 warheads, Iran is within a few years of one.

Because he has so bought into moral relativism, he cannot evaluate the subjective threat. USSR was sane in the aspect they calculated for victory with sufficient resources left to survive. Dinnerjacket and the Mad Mullahs, have no such desire, their calculation are based on the odd of inciting the return of the Mahdi.

He counts warheads, and assumes the enemy is like him self.

#54 Roentgen 5/19/08 5:52:38 pm 3

If BHO is elected, we will be subject to the global test for determining who gets the waffles. And the syrup. And everything else.

#55 wanumba 5/19/08 5:52:51 pm 6

Listened to that jerk say out loud that President Bush's failed policies were responsible for Iran being the biggest problem in the region.
I don't normally call people jerks, but between the standard DNC nonmenclature of "failed policies," and the fraud that Bush had anything to do with "making Iran" what it is today, while completely ignoring Ahmedinejad and his band of blood-stained Mullahs, just pushed me over the line.
Either 1979 means nothing to Barack, which is suicidal ignorance or Barack is counting on the rest of us nothing nothing about it, which is something eviller than plain old suicidal.

Are those crowds in Portland for real or have they been enhanced digitally? They look odd, as in repetitive.

Latestly a vote for a rotating title:
"... the ridiculous waffling and arugulaling going on now ..."

#56 Occasional Reader 5/19/08 5:52:57 pm 0

re: #41 kenprice

There is a word in Spanish: "Cantinflar". It means to talk a lot, and say absolutely nothing that makes any sense. BHO has taken Cantinflar to new oratorical heights. Worse, people hearing him think they know what he's saying. Total, absolute bullshit!.

You know, my Spanish is pretty durn good, and I didn't know that word. Thanks! Did the comic actor Cantinflas give rise to the word, or did the word precede the actor?

#57 Racer X 5/19/08 5:52:58 pm 3

All your waffles are belong to us.

#58 yochanan 5/19/08 5:53:13 pm 0

re: #11 song_and_dance_man

good call

#59 FrogMarch 5/19/08 5:53:31 pm 0

re: #48 anotherindyfilmguy

Wouldn't it be funny if Bush beat both McCain and Obama in the general election without even running? Guess he'd have to pick a successor then...

I wish Dick Cheney would run. Just to see Kieth Olberdouche's head explode.

#60 Mars Needs Neocons 5/19/08 5:53:52 pm 0

re: #47 Tangonine

I'm watching his speech from a replay from today on C-SPAN.

Some girl asked if he'd subsidize her education for law school.

He replies: "yes, of course! if you're going to be a public defender... but not if you're going to be a corporate lawyer..."

So apparently getting government subsidies under Barrack Hussein Obama depends entirely on you making the "right" political decisions.

what a fking dirtbag.

Understand, this is what it has always been about. Everything the libs set in place is designed to make the "right" choices. I am going through vocational rehab, the va, and other types of government aid, and only the VA isn't trying to railroad me into social services.

#61 jainphx 5/19/08 5:53:53 pm 0

re: #38 Roentgen

Oh my, Yes, yes you are.

#62 Racer X 5/19/08 5:54:04 pm 0

re: #47 Tangonine

I'm watching his speech from a replay from today on C-SPAN.

Some girl asked if he'd subsidize her education for law school.

He replies: "yes, of course! if you're going to be a public defender... but not if you're going to be a corporate lawyer..."

You have got to be kidding me.

#63 Grammy Cracker 5/19/08 5:54:20 pm 0

re: #33 Mars Needs Neocons

I've lost track am I a typical white person because I cling to guns and religion or is it because I'm supposed to be a racist.

I'm fairly certain it isn't an either/or situation...you're a typical white person. Therefore, you cling to your God and your guns, and you are a de facto racist from birth.

Just ask the wrong Rev. Wright.

[deleted] 5/19/08 5:54:39 pm 3
#65 astronmr20 5/19/08 5:54:54 pm 2

re: #53 jcm

Exactly.. this is clear to most of us here. The difference in the two comes down to three wonderful little words: "Mutually Assured Destruction."

These words stopped the USSR.

The same words motivate Iran.

#66 buzzsawmonkey 5/19/08 5:55:09 pm 0

re: #47 Tangonine

I'm watching his speech from a replay from today on C-SPAN.

Some girl asked if he'd subsidize her education for law school.

He replies: "yes, of course! if you're going to be a public defender... but not if you're going to be a corporate lawyer..."

So apparently getting government subsidies under Barrack Hussein Obama depends entirely on you making the "right" political decisions.

what a fking dirtbag.

My sister, a former prosecutor, continually tells her students that if they want to make a difference they should forget about becoming public defenders, and become prosecutors--because prosecutors have discretion.

This does not compute for many of them. The notion that it is noble to defend creeps who are almost invariably guilty and evil to protect society by putting them away has been deeply ingrained in students by the time they reach law school, and often reinforced there.

#67 eric 5/19/08 5:55:14 pm 8

Obama is in way over his head. This is the kind of rationalization and backpedaling you see in small town petty politics. He has an unfirm grasp of the issues and an inexperienced extemporaneous skill. he knows not what he will say next.

I believe he is completely unprincipled. He has no firm foundation to help him grapple with ideas and issues. His character is standing on quicksand and the scrutiny will bury him.

#68 livefreeor die 5/19/08 5:55:17 pm 0

re: #51 savage_nation

blackberry brandy!

Hmmm, on a blackberry brandy theme tonight, Savage?

#69 jcm 5/19/08 5:55:27 pm 0

re: #47 Tangonine

I'm watching his speech from a replay from today on C-SPAN.

Some girl asked if he'd subsidize her education for law school.

He replies: "yes, of course! if you're going to be a public defender... but not if you're going to be a corporate lawyer..."

So apparently getting government subsidies under Barrack Hussein Obama depends entirely on you making the "right" political decisions.

what a fking dirtbag.

Subsidize a PDA but not a Prosecutor?

Well we know where his priories lie.

#70 Bob in Breckenridge 5/19/08 5:55:57 pm 1

re: #54 Roentgen

If BHO is elected, we will be subject to the global test for determining who gets the waffles. And the syrup. And everything else.

And turn down your damn thermostat!

#71 unrealizedviewpoint 5/19/08 5:55:59 pm 1

re: #41 kenprice

There is a word in Spanish: "Cantinflar". It means to talk a lot, and say absolutely nothing that makes any sense. BHO has taken Cantinflar to new oratorical heights. Worse, people hearing him think they know what he's saying. Total, absolute bullshit!.

What do you think he was doing in the Rev. Wrights church the last 20 years? Learning how to Cantinflar.

#72 buzzsawmonkey 5/19/08 5:56:15 pm 0

re: #51 savage_nation

blackberry brandy!

Iphone vodka!

#73 Mars Needs Neocons 5/19/08 5:56:23 pm 0

Wait a minute, Portland, I'm in Billings, MT, are you watching a replay or am I. If we're both watching live then we're really dealing with the first "Max Headroom" candidate.

#74 livefreeor die 5/19/08 5:56:35 pm 0

re: #70 Bob in Breckenridge

And turn down your damn thermostat!

It will be the Carter years all over again.
Hope!
Change!
Malaise!

#75 Tangonine 5/19/08 5:56:43 pm 0

re: #62 Racer X

Nope. Dead serious. was on C-SPAN not 10 minutes ago. he pretty much said he'd pay for your education.... if you get the education he wants. In a nutshell.

#76 Roentgen 5/19/08 5:56:50 pm 0

re: #67 eric

Obama is in way over his head. This is the kind of rationalization and backpedaling you see in small town petty politics. He has an unfirm grasp of the issues and an inexperienced extemporaneous skill. he knows not what he will say next.

I believe he is completely unprincipled. He has no firm foundation to help him grapple with ideas and issues. His character is standing on quicksand and the scrutiny will bury him.

He's amorphous.

#77 LeePro 5/19/08 5:57:20 pm 0
Obama admitted that his willingness to try a new approach to foreign policy was his way of rocking the political boat. ‘I’ve been trying to challenge some conventional wisdom.’“ [Kansas City Star, 8/20/07]

Correction:
...trying to challenge ALL wisdom.

[deleted] 5/19/08 5:57:24 pm 0
#79 Intrepid 5/19/08 5:57:25 pm 0

re: #31 gop_patriot

WTF does that mean?!? UGH Progressives and their imaginary made up meanings for words. "term of art", right. Moron.

Just like Hillary Clinton's "Politics of Meaning" statements of a decade and a half ago. It means they can say anything they want and then when questioned on it, they can massage it into any form they want it to take.

That way they can say stuff that makes 'em sound smart and "progressive" like.

Basically, I call it lying about what he originally said because he has been taking so much flack for it.

#80 Grammy Cracker 5/19/08 5:57:26 pm 1

re: #51 savage_nation

blackberry brandy!

Pssst....I have that, too. Just don't tell the others! They'll want some and I'm too greedy, white and racist to share with everyone!

/here, have a cracker....

#81 brainwizard73 5/19/08 5:57:29 pm 2

My bold prediction is that this thread will set a record for the fewest posts on an "Obama" themed thread due to the baffling incomprehensibility of the various positions.

Seriously, by the time you get done with this verbal gonorrhea, it's enough to make you cry out for a stupid Ron Paul liner.

#82 Sharmuta 5/19/08 5:57:34 pm 0
But what I have said is that at some point I would be willing to meet. And that is a position, I mean, what’s puzzling is that we view this as in any way controversial

How dare we see this as a problem! He just has the Audacity of Preparation!

#83 NoSubmission 5/19/08 5:57:34 pm 0

re: #66 buzzsawmonkey
I found it interesting that a lot of federal prosecutors go on to become defense attorneys. Better money.

#84 buzzsawmonkey 5/19/08 5:57:46 pm 0

re: #51 savage_nation

blackberry brandy!

Bluetooth bourbon!

#85 unrealizedviewpoint 5/19/08 5:57:52 pm 1

re: #67 eric

Obama is in way over his head. This is the kind of rationalization and backpedaling you see in small town petty politics. He has an unfirm grasp of the issues and an inexperienced extemporaneous skill. he knows not what he will say next.

I believe he is completely unprincipled. He has no firm foundation to help him grapple with ideas and issues. His character is standing on quicksand and the scrutiny will bury him.

Ain't nobody questioned him before. Don't be so hard on him, he learning.

#86 astronmr20 5/19/08 5:58:00 pm 1

re: #78 savage_nation

yesssssssssssss

Better not be drinkin' in that big rig! (;

#87