Too many waffles!

This is an Obama Nation!

Right outta High school.....

Don't give the Hillary blackhats any ideas!

'Hope' and 'Change' require NO EXPERTISE.

re: #5 experiencedtraveller

They just 'hope' nobody 'changes' their stuff :)

Access to directory to be shut down in 3, 2, 1..

Anybody got "DownThemAll" and a fast computer?

/not me, alas

IM IN UR WEBSIET STEALING UR FILEZ

...Well, maybe not, but didn't somebody here frisk one of the Neo-Nazi websites for Ron Paul images when they left their directory open?

Anyone who wants to can sign up and create a blog on Obama's website. Do you really expect him to waste staff monitoring them all?

Why no, not at all.

/by all means, the Obamarama campaign should absolutely feel free to shoot themselves in the face to their heart's content

"No, NO! Obama DOES have a new robe, of FINEST PURE THREADS, visible only to those who RECOGNIZE VALUE and are NOT RACISTS! Really!"

WHy hire webadmins with clue when LGF will do it for you?

re: #7 unrealizedviewpoint

Access to directory to be shut down in 3, 2, 1..

Nah, ya think they're reading this wacko site?

//

Charles, just stop it! This is too much. Just too much.

/s

re: #13 rockdad

Nah, ya think they're reading this wacko site?

//

But I thought they were us? Or something? Does that mean we're reading ourselves?

/pair o' ducks

Charles, they should send you a thank you card and a check for all the improvements you're suggesting.

BTW, when will Obama condemn the anti-Semitism (and sexism) of his blogging friends?

Heh- another poster.

re: #15 Pawn of the Oppressor

It's an inside job I tell ya. The Zionists are everywhere.

Bwa haha :)

Charles,
Are you going to send Obama's campaign a bill for your services?

Is there anything useful in there other than the web administrators of that site demonstrating incompetence?

Parent Directory

/are they still going to claim this isn't Obama's official website?

I'm sure he'd treat our nuclear arsenal the same way.

re: #6 demitall

They just 'hope' nobody 'changes' their stuff :)

They want OUR STUFF.

Let's see....at least a third of Hillary voters said they would vote for McCain instead of Obama, the other Democrat.

How many Huckabee and Romney voters said they would vote for Obama? ? ? ?

I have no idea what this means.

What is the consequence of leaving a directory open?

re: #17 Sharmuta
Amachoor, Obama... strickly amachoor!

/I'm off home...

re: #16 indythinker

Charles, they should send you a thank you card and a check for all the improvements you're suggesting.

BTW, when will Obama condemn the anti-Semitism (and sexism) of his blogging friends?

No. But Barry's webmaster(s) will probably be under the bus before lunch tomorrow.

And that reminds me. I see this one PDF in that which I opened it up and it's a flier for the Obama campaign.

The last statement of the flier is startling.

4: Take immediate steps to confront the humanitarian disaster in Iraq, and hold accountable any perpetrators of war crimes.

Okay 1: Iraq is now a humanitarian disaster? 2: Are war crimes in reference to the Haditha scandal? Does this mean Obama views the soldiers at Haditha are guilty until proven innocent?

re: #23 experiencedtraveller

I think my wife would be mad if I gave them my 'stuff'.

Seriously tho, this is the second big laugh.. the poster claiming that McCain's site has substandard search because they don't have clue, followed up by finding a complete dir (containing everything (unless they store stuff in a db and even then you can get it) open to downthemall or wget or curl or a hundred other tools.

Security standards are a paleo-patriarchal causecoid subjugational construct that was created to hold down and destroy nonpatriarcal student collectives.

This is what happens when you run your campaign according to your own crappy Marxist ideology. Everything ends up amateurish, broken and sucky.

IN SOVIET OBAMASTAN, WEBSITE MODERATES YOU.

re: #24 DesertSage

Let's see....at least a third of Hillary voters said they would vote for McCain instead of Obama, the other Democrat.

Assuming that Obama and Clinton were split roughly 50-50 (which by most counts they were), and that the primary voters are typical of the Dem electorate (which is probably NOT true), that means that potentially 1/6 of the natural Dem electorate could go to McCain.

If that's true, that would be a landslide for McCain.

re: #25 Cognito

I have no idea what this means.

What is the consequence of leaving a directory open?

I once made this mistake.

On the very first web site I ever designed.

This is a really bad sign; it means there are almost certainly other big security holes at the site.

re: #28 Kaitian868

Does this mean Obama views the soldiers at Haditha are guilty until proven innocent?

Haven't most of them already been proven innocent?

re: #28 Kaitian868

And that reminds me. I see this one PDF in that which I opened it up and it's a flier for the Obama campaign.

The last statement of the flier is startling.

4: Take immediate steps to confront the humanitarian disaster in Iraq, and hold accountable any perpetrators of war crimes.

Okay 1: Iraq is now a humanitarian disaster? 2: Are war crimes in reference to the Haditha scandal? Does this mean Obama views the soldiers at Haditha are guilty until proven innocent?

Written by players, for lefties.

The Commies will eat this shit up, they thought, as they typed up the copy

I. Just. Can't. Go. On. Laughing. Like. This. Charles you're amazing!
I do have to go to bed, now, however, so I'll wish you all a good night and hope I get the chance to see you all down the road!

Guess the password game. Did they rename the admin file?
Hope.
Change.
Login.
Admin.
Obama, yet that's the ticket.
/

re: #34 looking closely

Haven't most of them already been proven innocent?

Yes, they have but Obama doesn't recognize that Al Qaeda is in Iraq right now so therefore there's no war crimes being committed by them so what other suggestions does that leave it? All I know is Haditha that comes to mind.

re: #28 Kaitian868

And that reminds me. I see this one PDF in that which I opened it up and it's a flier for the Obama campaign.

The last statement of the flier is startling.

4: Take immediate steps to confront the humanitarian disaster in Iraq, and hold accountable any perpetrators of war crimes.

Okay 1: Iraq is now a humanitarian disaster? 2: Are war crimes in reference to the Haditha scandal? Does this mean Obama views the soldiers at Haditha are guilty until proven innocent?

Wow!

Maybe the Obama supporters are smart enough not to use their credit cards to make contributions to the campaign on a website with iffy security.

re: #36 realwest

Nite real! Sweet dreams.
;)

"These are not the web designers that I knew."

I grabbed that PDF too. The Obama campaign is not going to like having this get out.

If nothing else, Obama now has a good excuse to 404 his website.

That he allowed his website to be run so poorly is proof that an Obama Administration would be run no better. It would be one stupid scandal after another.

Wow:
[Link: www.dailykos.com...]

Way to get the Hillary voters on obamas side.
This low class

re: #33 Charles

I once made this mistake.

On the very first web site I ever designed.

This is a really bad sign; it means there are almost certainly other big security holes at the site.

So?
His site appears to still be up and running.
You'd think at least one of the Ron Paulians would have tried to squish it, if that were possible.

re: #39 Charles

Wow!

Reality is a paleo-patriarchal ... do I have to continue?

Is this history being made?

re: #33 Charles

I once made this mistake.

On the very first web site I ever designed.

This is a really bad sign; it means there are almost certainly other big security holes at the site.

Maybe he wants to be hacked. He can then blame it on McCain supporters and play the Victim.

re: #46 looking closely

So?
His site appears to still be up and running.
You'd think at least one of the Ron Paulians would have tried to squish it, if that were possible.

He's been lucky. I know people who would be able to run through that web site like a Mongol horde.

re: #40 jaunte

Maybe the Obama supporters are smart enough not to use their credit cards to make contributions to the campaign on a website with iffy security.

Then again, maybe not!

re: #43 Charles

I grabbed that PDF too. The Obama campaign is not going to like having this get out.

I'm not savvy enough to do this, but someone should just mirror his entire site. . pronto. .then explore it at their leisure.

re: #28 Kaitian868

Could you post the link?
I would like a copy of that.

re: #33 Charles

I once made this mistake.

On the very first web site I ever designed.

This is a really bad sign; it means there are almost certainly other big security holes at the site.

I wonder if campaign websites are to regular sites what campaign offices are to regular offices.

Which is to say, pretty shabby, cheap furniture, nomadic decor, donuts left out from yesterday...

Hi lizards-
Just checking in briefly and I see I've missed some fun stuff today- my favorite being the "Denver brown note". Wow. I have a few friends of moonbat persuasion, and I am wondering aloud if they've drunk enough kool-aid for that one.

re: #43 Charles

I grabbed that PDF too. The Obama campaign is not going to like having this get out.

I smell another thread.

re: #53 Typicalwhitey

Could you post the link?
I would like a copy of that.

[Link: www.barackobama.com...]

re: #43 Charles

I grabbed that PDF too. The Obama campaign is not going to like having this get out.

Are you going to post it?

re: #58 DesertSage

Are you going to post it?

You bet I am.

re: #50 Charles

He's been lucky. I know people who would be able to run through that web site like a Mongol horde.

When you say "run through" you mean that nothing on the site is secure, is that it?

(Not that the site itself is necessarily vulnerable to editing or deleting).

re: #42 FQ Kafir

"These are not the web designers that I knew."

"I am saddened and deeply shocked. I can swear I told those fuckers to hide all that stuff."

re: #48 Salem

Yup!
;)

re: #28 Kaitian868

Wait -- where is that?

We have given Obama the excuse he and the MSM need to excuse the hateful ponderings of his puppets.

Doing a google search on the statement, it's already known out on the web but it seems to me it hasn't been made a big deal.

re: #3 Maximu§

Right outta High school.....

Just like his supporters.

re: #59 Charles

You bet I am.

Here I wanted to get some sleep. Oh well. :)

re: #57 Kaitian868

You're an angel thank you!

re: #50 Charles

He's been lucky. I know people who would be able to run through that web site like a Mongol horde poop thru a hippy in Denver.

Much better.

re: #67 unrealizedviewpoint

Here I wanted to get some sleep. Oh well. :)

Oh....but this will be sooooo much better than sleep.
:')

re: #59 Charles

Check the meta-data too... if that tracks back to a registered adobe copy for the Obama campaign, it's much more inflammatory. Just ask Google after getting hit on an 'anonymous' complaint about eBay a couple weeks ago.... with the meta-data tracking the word doc back to Google.

re: #69 stevieray

that's hilarious!

He can't protect a website, and he's going to protect our borders?

re: #59 Charles

You bet I am.

And there's your consequence.

re: #44 Syrah

If nothing else, Obama now has a good excuse to 404 his website.

That he allowed his website to be run so poorly is proof that an Obama Administration would be run no better. It would be one stupid scandal after another.

I agree- I think his site is completely indicative of what we'd see from an administration run by Dear Leader.

re: #50 Charles

He's been lucky. I know people who would be able to run through that web site like a Mongol horde.

They already have.

/you've been posting their work all day

re: #69 stevieray

Much better.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!

re: #62 Irene NYC

Yup!
;)

Well, okay! Time to wave our freak-flags high!

re: #33 Charles

I once made this mistake.

On the very first web site I ever designed.

This is a really bad sign; it means there are almost certainly other big security holes at the site.

So Obama's web people could blame others for the anti-Semitism that's all over their website? Sounds rather convenient.

re: #74 Cognito

And there's your consequence.

What does that mean?

re: #50 Charles

He's been lucky. I know people who would be able to run through that web site like a Mongol horde.

Cyber-Mongols?

Where's that GK quote...ah!

“The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters.”

Darn! How can this be adapted?

Being programming illiterate I just wonder how hard it would be to hack in and create a restore point of say, 1 June - all the flushed reappear. They dump, create another restore point.

re: #71 demitall

Check the meta-data too... if that tracks back to a registered adobe copy for the Obama campaign, it's much more inflammatory. Just ask Google after getting hit on an 'anonymous' complaint about eBay a couple weeks ago.... with the meta-data tracking the word doc back to Google.

All it shows that it was written in Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh. Unless someone else can find more than that.

re: #33 Charles

how many Obamaniacs' financial data has been put at risk?

/identity theft is no joke!

HEY McCAIN! LEGALIZE IT, MON!

re: #73 vbspurs

He can't protect a website, and he's going to protect our borders?

When did he ever say he would protect our borders? Never happened. Never will under an Obama admin.

Glad a pic of him in the shower with an asshat as a shower cap is not on there

re: #86 unrealizedviewpoint

He'd let anyone come over and use his healthcare

re: #87 trigger girlie

Glad a pic of him in the shower with an asshat as a shower cap is not on there

If I were such a vandal (and I am not, don't have the ability or desire), I'd make subtle changes to all his graphics and logos.

The kind of thing you might not notice right away. . .

That site is still wide open...they must all be asleep over there...I would have guessed somebody would have done something by now...wow.

All I can say relative to #2:

If the UN goes to Iraq and stays for more then a week, it proves we won the war because none of those types would ever go into a war zone......

unless it was for sex, of course.

re: #28 Kaitian868

perpetrators of war crimes

That's Moonspeak for American soldiers

re: #80 Sharmuta

What does that mean?

He meant the consequence of leaving the back door open on the website....Charles was able to grab that document.

re: #83 Kaitian868

I'm a little between a rock and a hard place, well actually it would put a friend between a rock and a hard place, however, theoretically, there SHOULD be more data avaialble. Not that that is anything but theoretical pondering.

Hey Kos, who's the one with yellow teeth now?

Ooh, here's one that requires a password:

[Link: www.barackobama.com...]

/well, not really, just hit cancel and it let's you in

[Link: pentdego.com...]re: #65 Kaitian868
Is this it? [Link: www.barackobama.com...]

re: #91 yesandno

or loot

re: #90 rc

they're all out on a hope for change bike ride

re: #79 Bob in Breckenridge

So Obama's web people could blame others for the anti-Semitism that's all over their website? Sounds rather convenient.

For BHO's campaign.

re: #29 demitall

Frighteningly, I have seen 2 quality business owners sell their 'stuff' within the last few weeks in fear of Obama's economics. These aren't financiers; they are just working business owners very concerned about capital gains taxes.

Srsly - this is Throbbing Memo Version 2.0.

I love it!
;)

re: #67 unrealizedviewpoint

Here I wanted to get some sleep. Oh well. :)

No Sleep Till Brooklyn!

re: #93 DesertSage

Thanks, Sage. It's late and I'm weary from battling idiots at politico.

re: #75 Sharmuta

I agree- I think his site is completely indicative of what we'd see from an administration run by the Dear Deer In Headlights Leader.

That's what he will be like. A deer in the headlights. No effin' clue. We pulled out of Iraq and DinJack moved in. Now what Michelle?

re: #91 yesandno

All I can say relative to #2:

If the UN goes to Iraq and stays for more then a week, it proves we won the war because none of those types would ever go into a war zone......

unless it was for sex, of course.

All the hot Iraqi girls are already dating GIs. All that's left for the UN and terrorists are fat chicks and goats.

/and that's how it's always been, with your Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines

re: #97 realwest

Heh, I think that's it.

"I had no knowledge of those hateful remarks on the web site run by my supporters. It in no way represents my position on those issues".

There. Feel free to copy and paste, Barry.

Only someone eevviilll would take advantage of their monumental cluelessness, right?

Morons.

re: #87 trigger girlie

{Trigger}! Even thought I hate you madly, I've missed you!

Here's a screenshot of the 1-2-3-4 Iraq plans if elected:

#4 is chilling, because I sense he intends to listen to trumped up charges against our troops, and PUNISH them summarily.

Heh

We at BarackObama.com are committed to protecting the privacy and security of your visits to this website. Outlined below is our online privacy policy. If you have questions about this policy, please let us know.

I think our Dear Leader is busy, busy, bus doing sumthin nefarious no doubt. Can't wait!

re: #109 van helsing

Actually more accurate than you'd think.... I know many conservatives with 'mad skills' at computers (I'm kind of one of them and know a bunch that put me to shame). However, we'd never take advantage like that (at least all the ones I know).

re: #111 vbspurs

how can our fellow Americans be so blind to support this candidate?

/the question we all ask

The UN is going to decide the fate of Iraq? I'm sure the "Human Rights" council would love to have their way.

re: #97 realwest

PIMF :Kaitian868 already provided the link at his #57.
Sorry - now that PROVES I need my sleep!

Goodnight again all y'all!

re: #114 demitall

something about the moral high ground

re: #115 schultzw

how can our fellow Americans be so blind to support this candidate?

/the question we all ask

Blinded by the Lightworker?

re: #117 realwest

PIMF :Kaitian868 already provided the link at his #57.
Sorry - now that PROVES I need my sleep!

Goodnight again all y'all!

That's just in the scenario they delete it.

You people are so mean. Do some more.

re: #118 schultzw

That is a major factor, another one is that we make MAD money, and don't want to put that at risk :)

re: #119 The Other Les

too full of waffles, and napping them off

re: #122 demitall

count it!

re: #115 schultzw

how can our fellow Americans be so blind to support this candidate?

It's a blindness even Helen Keller never knew.

re: #111 vbspurs

Here's a

My OS conks every time I try to open the soon-to-be-famous flier.

I blame Carville.

I hate to even suggest this, because it does sound a little moonbatty...but given that this has been a big embarrassment for BO, does anybody think there is a chance they just 'unlocked all the doors and threw them wide open' to support the entire 'it was a hack job, we just had incompetent web designers' meme that the lefty's are peddling right now to excuse what was on the site?