Why Is Bush Helping Saudi Arabia Build Nukes?

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Tue Jun 10, 2008 at 12:52 pm PDT • Views: 257

At the Wall Street Journal: Why Is Bush Helping Saudi Arabia Build Nukes?

Here’s a quick geopolitical quiz: What country is three times the size of Texas and has more than 300 days of blazing sun a year? What country has the world’s largest oil reserves resting below miles upon miles of sand? And what country is being given nuclear power, not solar, by President George W. Bush, even when the mere assumption of nuclear possession in its region has been known to provoke pre-emptive air strikes, even wars?

If you answered Saudi Arabia to all of these questions, you’re right.

Last month, while the American people were becoming the personal ATMs of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was in Saudi Arabia signing away an even more valuable gift: nuclear technology. In a ceremony little-noticed in this country, Ms. Rice volunteered the U.S. to assist Saudi Arabia in developing nuclear reactors, training nuclear engineers, and constructing nuclear infrastructure. While oil breaks records at $130 per barrel or more, the American consumer is footing the bill for Saudi Arabia’s nuclear ambitions.

Saudi Arabia has poured money into developing its vast reserves of natural gas for domestic electricity production. It continues to invest in a national gas transportation pipeline and stepped-up exploration, building a solid foundation for domestic energy production that could meet its electricity needs for many decades. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, would require enormous investments in new infrastructure by a country with zero expertise in this complex technology.

Have Ms. Rice, Mr. Bush or Saudi leaders looked skyward? The Saudi desert is under almost constant sunshine. If Mr. Bush wanted to help his friends in Riyadh diversify their energy portfolio, he should have offered solar panels, not nuclear plants.

Saudi Arabia’s interest in nuclear technology can only be explained by the dangerous politics of the Middle East.

Read it and weep.

Previously at LGF:
We’re Giving Saudi Arabia Enriched Uranium, They’re Giving Us the Shaft

Advertisement

157 comments

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Account Settings Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

There is no hell. There is only France.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

Aigle
Judi Rudoren Enters the Scene: Tweets or Tea Leaves?
15 minutes ago
Views: 11 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Aigle
New Online Newspaper in Israel
16 minutes ago
Views: 17 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Turnabout is Fair Play
A 787 Dreamliner Drew the Boeing Logo Across the United States
31 minutes ago
Views: 33 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Daniel Ballard
The Boy Who Played With Fusion
1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Views: 67 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

lawhawk
Assad Claims Referendum Will Ease Crisis; Brutal Crackdown Continues
1 hour, 8 minutes ago
Views: 48 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

wrenchwench
Mexico Issues Travel Warning for Los United Estates
1 hour, 11 minutes ago
Views: 68 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1

Daniel Ballard
Independent Voters Are Rejecting Romney
1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Views: 65 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Channeling Confucius
6 Terrifying User Agreements You've Probably Accepted
2 hours, 7 minutes ago
Views: 80 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Turnabout is Fair Play
The Muslim Brotherhood's Post-Mubarak Anti-Americanism
2 hours, 21 minutes ago
Views: 70 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

MichaelJ
Daring Fireball: Walter Isaacson's 'Steve Jobs'
2 hours, 36 minutes ago
Views: 82 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

 Frank says:

I feel it's better to sing about these things ourselves and perform them with the people who it happened to than to have some journalist one day say 'then in 1971, one time when they were at the mudshark hotel...' But people have problems with things of a glandular nature in connection with things of a musical nature. They say why, music is way up here, and glands are way down there and they can't get 'em together, but then they are hypocritical because they take a band that doesn't sing about such things directly and couches their language a little and does it with a little choreography and say that that's great and that's real rock and roll. I maintain that there's no difference, we're just honest enough to get up and say 'this is this and that's that and here you are and respond to it' and the response is 'why... I'm hip, but of course I am offended'.