I must break you!

The scissors are a nice touch...

Obama. Just. Say. NO!

I don't know about the glasses.

Awesome photoshop - fu!

These aren't the people I knew!

He'll "disassociate" himself long enough to get elected, then welcome these fools into the White House with open arms and great fanfare!

NOBAMA '08

Love the red borg eye lol

Louie's face is priceless.

don't worry folks...
he'll be baraaack.

steel steal-tipped shoes for industry

NOBAMA '08!¤

There's something about the look on his face that really does give me the creeps.

Just noticed the flag....bwahahahahah!

Any chance the Gov of California is on Obama's short list for VP.

As nuts as that sounds, the more I think about it, the more it seems possible.

Let him go running with those scissors. Let's Roll!

As time goes on more people and places will need to be added.

"Once I throw you under the bus, you won't be back."

/Schwarzenegger voice off

What does it say on the sunglasses?

re: #12 Cognito

There's something about the look on his face that really does give me the creeps.

The Manchurian Cyborg.

re: #14 brainwizard73

Any chance the Gov of California is on Obama's short list for VP.

I'd imagine the same restrictions for running for POTUS also apply to VPOTUS. My guess is...thankfully, no.

I could no more......that's not the.......Israel is only doing...................fahgetaboutit;
what does a guy have to say to get elected around here?
Warcrimes! I love hillary! Global warming! Bring it on! I have forgotten what a gag reflex is!

It's missing the G-Ma

Due to the Line of Succession

A prediction for, say, circa 2011:

"This is not the me that I knew."

Barack Obama: "Friends"

Oh hell check this one out:
Live Vote
Should an Islamic school be allowed to lease county property while using textbooks that teach intolerance? * 3053 responses

No way. The school should be shut down immediately.
67%

Yes. One way to teach tolerance is to show tolerance.
14%

The school should be forced to select new textbooks or lose its lease.
19%
Not a scientific survey. Click to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding.
[Link: www.msnbc.msn.com...]

Hahaha, niiiiice... Very nice.

Usually political photoshops are pretty bad, but this one is awesome.

re: #21 swamprat

what does a guy have to say to get elected around here?

"The seas will recede, the clouds will part and the Sun will shine when I am elected!"...

Or, some bullshit like that.

Bike is missing. Or a bicycle pump.

For some reason I pictured him as a bus driver on a rampage. Oh well I can deal with the Terminator motif.

/who's next on his list.

I'll be Barrraaakk.

/Schwarzenegger voice.

He bad.

Has he released his birth certificate yet?

I still say that he's not as large as most people think he is. I'd put him at 5'10 tops, probably less than than.

But until he releases that information, he's a giant among men.

Well...a Terminator link...with a secret message for Barbara Helga O....

re: #31 metal man

already done see #10

re: #34 kostya lotz

Damn, gotta be quick around here..

Nice! I wouldn't be surprised if we see a sequel before the general, he will have more ties to cut.

If I had the time and the computer skills, I'd get a video clip of Barry O speaking, and dub in the Terminator saying, "F**K YOU, A**HOLE" as a companion to this graphic.

sorry ot..seems I haven't seen any posts lately by savage nation or songanddanceman...anybody know anything or are they just off on some unimaginable tryst together?

Too bad the whole church couldn't fit into the photoshop.

I need your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle.

and your estate, your capital gains, your windfall profits......

re: #33 Slumbering Behemoth

Yup, that's the one!

re: #38 joecitizen

Pushed the host, got the boot.

Hilarious! I love it.

re: #42 Slumbering Behemoth

Pushed the host, got the boot.

wow no shit? whodathunk it?

I love Reverend Wright's facial expression.

re: #44 joecitizen

wow no shit? whodathunk it?

frankly,I'll miss 'em both...mostly added to the atmosphere IMHO.

re: #42 Slumbering Behemoth

I heard about Savage's meltdown, but what did S&DM do?

re: #40 formercorpsman

I need your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle.

and your estate, your capital gains, your windfall profits......

Day 1.

re: #38 joecitizen

sorry ot..seems I haven't seen any posts lately by savage nation or songanddanceman...anybody know anything or are they just off on some unimaginable tryst together?

Uh.....S+DM believes that man is evidence of intelligent design. Savage thinks otherwise and has declared his intent to rectify the situation.

re: #47 mikalm

I heard about Savage's meltdown, but what did S&DM do?

if anyone is giving details,I'd love to know.

re: #29 swamprat

Bike is missing. Or a bicycle pump.

Bowling ball.

Iraq.

I have to go to sleep Lizards!

Have a great evening!

I'd pay good money to see him disassociate himself with himself, then throw himself under a bus. Heh.

re: #50 joecitizen

if anyone is giving details,I'd love to know.

Kept pushing for personal answers re. the existence of a supreme being from the Lizard King. Simply wouldn't give it a rest. At least that was the final.

re: #48 really grumpy big dog Johnson

No doubt.

BHO has a nice smile. but have you ever seen him look a bit angry? Ugly, ugly man. Creepy.

re: #50 joecitizen

Savage is having a serious personal crisis, and dealt with it by coming on here and threatening to shoot people. Charles warned him many times and banned him for a few short intervals, but he persisted with the death threats. So he's now permanently barred.

S&DM, I don't know.

It all makes sense now.
Obama raises so much internet money through all the John Connors he sent back in time to donate to him:)

I'm out guys, have a good night.

re: #25 freedomplow

Better and a bit more entertaining.

re: #30 BlueCanuck

I agree. There needs to be a bumbling bus rolling over the victims of his "cut'em loose" policy to not intimate his real biases, ie, race "typical white G-Ma", creed " belligerent gun holding Christians", and nationality " 57 states".

Hasta la vista, baby.

This is why I can't stand Demonrats!

They completely twist every single position held by conservatives. I was starting to think that Democrats had some brains, what with all the conservative Democrats getting elected lately. But after seeing this clip, I know I still can't trust them.

Bollynator!

re: #38 joecitizen

sorry ot..seems I haven't seen any posts lately by savage nation or songanddanceman...anybody know anything or are they just off on some unimaginable tryst together?

Savage was banned.
He made some very violent threats.....some things about shooting his daughter's boyfriend and also himself. Charles said Savage had received many warnings and had even been banned before, so this decision is final.

re: #54 guzziguy

OIC. The religious arguments here can get ugly, can't they? And the Believers and the Disbelievers can often be equally obnoxious, it seems.

re: #20 6pat6

I'd imagine the same restrictions for running for POTUS also apply to VPOTUS. My guess is...thankfully, no.

I would hope not, but I think consitituionally, that there was some suggestion that he could serve as VP, but if the Prez were ever incapacitated, that the succession would have to skip him...

re: #56 dammad

BHO has a nice smile. but have you ever seen him look a bit angry? Ugly, ugly man. Creepy.

I don't think he's all that much under the best of circumstances. This swooning garbage is spurred my the media. McCain comes across as more masculine, Hussein as some sort of metrosexual pilates guy with a bottle of Estee Lauder moisturizer.

heh.

re: #63 DesertSage
WTF?
LOL

re: #57 mikalm

Savage is having a serious personal crisis, and dealt with it by coming on here and threatening to shoot people. Charles warned him many times and banned him for a few short intervals, but he persisted with the death threats. So he's now permanently barred.

S&DM, I don't know.

wow,I know sav had threatened the kid (jobass?) but missed him going overboard...S&DMan could be a little strident in his faith at times and we tangled over it,but I thought that was par for the course for some Lizards and all in all thought they were both decent enough chaps...

Obama - the final 5th cylon.

It fits.

re: #37 mikalm
hhheeeee's not Barry. We know Barry. Barry is a HERO of ours and heeee's no hero!

He's BARRY
[Link: www.youtube.com...]

re: #63 DesertSage

I think I just lost my appetitte. Also a lot of those points seem to be what the democraps seem to do anyway.

/sound a lot like our liberal party up here.

re: #67 brainwizard73

I would hope not, but I think consitituionally, that there was some suggestion that he could serve as VP, but if the Prez were ever incapacitated, that the succession would have to skip him...

no,since the primary function of a veep is to succeed..

re: #47 mikalm

I heard about Savage's meltdown, but what did S&DM do?

S&DM was getting a little too personal when he was asking Charles to answer a question.
I don't think Charles wanted to ban him, but it just got to be too much.

I really believe that there could be a reinstatement of his account at some point. At least I'm hoping.

re: #74 BlueCanuck

I think I just lost my appetitte. Also a lot of those points seem to be what the democraps seem to do anyway.

/sound a lot like our liberal party up here.

We all know which side of the aisle is your comfort zone.

re: #66 mikalm

OIC. The religious arguments here can get ugly, can't they? And the Believers and the Disbelievers can often be equally obnoxious, it seems.

Yes. Charles has made it completely clear he's no believer in ID. S&DM is. What Charles believes regarding articles of faith have no bearing on what he does here. S&DM kept pushing over and over again. I don't agree with Charles all the time, but I understand that it's his site and we are allowed here so long as we behave by his rather open rules.
In my opinion one has to do something pretty silly to get banned.

re: #75 joecitizen

no,since the primary function of a veep is to succeed..

Until I review the U.S. Code and the annotated Constitution, I will withhold judgment. I think the VP has more "duties" than just being next in line...and I don't think the constitution proscribes a native born requirement for the VP...although I didn't read every word of Article II.

Just don't bet that if the Dems want Arnold, there were be a way to make it happen...

No-brained liberal paired with steroid-brained liberal RINO...yikes.

It's been almost 70 minutes now, and the area to the south of me is still totally blacked out.

I hope this doesn't impact their mushroom production.

Oh criminy, here we go.

re: #76 DesertSage
I liked S&DM a lot so I hope that is possible but he was pushing Charles and that's not right.

re: #78 guzziguy

Death threats are more than silly, they are actionable and get someone hospitalized with the intended victims given official warning.
I more than understand Charles' desire to keep that stuff off the site. If it were me, I'd have called the police department.

re: #83 SpartanWoman

Sure. I was referring to S&DM not Savage. One was criminal, the other very annoying.

re: #79 brainwizard73

Until I review the U.S. Code and the annotated Constitution, I will withhold judgment. I think the VP has more "duties" than just being next in line...and I don't think the constitution proscribes a native born requirement for the VP...although I didn't read every word of Article II.

Just don't bet that if the Dems want Arnold, there were be a way to make it happen...

No-brained liberal paired with steroid-brained liberal RINO...yikes.

that and being president of the senate to cast tie breaking votes is it for the veep..anything else is at the pleasure of the president..

re: #83 SpartanWoman

Death threats are more than silly, they are actionable and get someone hospitalized with the intended victims given official warning.
I more than understand Charles' desire to keep that stuff off the site. If it were me, I'd have called the police department.

I think that at the particular point of banishment that Charles out of a civic sense of duty would have surely done exactly that.

re: #84 guzziguy

I understand that. The religious guy probably just pushed too hard, but my point is that I have never noticed people being banned for silly matters. People get away with all sorts of stuff that crosses over the silliness line every day. You have to be outrageous and have violated more than ample warnings

re: #78 guzziguy

Yup. I just had a disagreement with The Big Lizard over on the White-Racists-for-Obama thread, but it's just about the nature and significance of the source info, nothing more. Really, so long as we stay focused on essentials, agree to disagree on minor points, and don't try to pursue personal religious agendas, I think we'll all be fine.

(Oh -- and not issue death threats or exterminationist rhetoric, yes!)

re: #82 Pvt Bin Jammin

I liked S&DM a lot so I hope that is possible but he was pushing Charles and that's not right.

I don't think the split between Charles and S&DM is irreparable. I do think that S&DM needs time to think things over though.

Savage OTOH pushed way too far, way too often.

You know, I really think this will catch up with Obama. You can't keep sweeping this kind o' stuff under the rug and get away with it - not with all of the alternative avenues of information available these days. And his less-than-24-hour flip-flop on Jerusalem will bite him in the arse, that's for sure. It's not easy pissing off both the Israelis and the Muslims in one 24-hour period over one issue.

Just shows to go ya - he can't keep up the illusion over the long run. After all, he only REALLY began to unravel as the possible candidates began to dwindle and more individual attention was paid to him. What do you think is going to happen when it comes down to the party v. party battle royale?

the sinner,

Charles

re: #86 really grumpy big dog Johnson

I agree.

re: #87 SpartanWoman

I'm on here a lot less than many other Lizards, and I was disturbed by Savage's violent rantings. In aggregate, it probably constituted more than enough justification for banning, especially after repeated warnings.

re: #87 SpartanWoman

If there were a silliness line that, once crossed, got a Lizard banned, I would have been booted before I made it to comment #10.

Bollynator 2!

re: #90 Charles the Hammer

Maybe that will be the case. We will know for sure when the media start finally asking questions of the Obamessiah. When they do that it will only be because they know the people have caught on and that they must go along with the majority to preserve and dignity or credibility.

re: #87 SpartanWoman

I can go with your assessment. But, I've seen trolls banned after a very few posts. Those I'd classify as silly, stupid, annoying (pick your favorite adjective). I too hated to see S&DM go, but I could clearly see the line he crossed.

All that being said, I certainly agree that anyone who has any value as a participant here, or is a genuine seeker of information is not banned without cause. I didn't intend to infer that they were.

We have the Chi-Coms hacking computers in Washington and Obama's attention is on the fact that one of his bobos is shady.

Sounds like a Democrat president (soon to be president) being distracted from real national security threats by a domestic political issue. Where have I heard that before?

re: #93 Slumbering Behemoth

I may not agree with your silliness, but I will suffer slight discomfort to allow you to say it.

re: #94 SpartanWoman

Maybe that will be the case. We will know for sure when the media start finally asking questions of the Obamessiah. When they do that it will only be because they know the people have caught on and that they must go along with the majority to preserve and dignity or credibility.

They might simply start asking him questions because they have the attention span of mayflies and will get bored with their adulation after a while--so they will try attack mode as a novelty.

And, if Obama knifes one of their own--which is probable, since it seems to be a reflex on his part--they will turn on him like rabid dogs.

savage_nation will not be allowed back to LGF. I should have banned him a LONG time ago, but listened to people who told me they liked him, and he was a good person, etc. He was not a good person, he was a manipulator, and his days of manipulating me are over.

S&DM really crossed a personal line with me, and it's very unlikely that he'll be back.

[Link: www.youtube.com...]
He's never going to be POTUS; speaking without a prompter makes him Ted Baxter on the Mary Tyler Moore Show...... tanned and shallow
[Link: www.youtube.com...]

What is the over/under on when one of those "tossed under the bus people" really goes "state's evidence" and calls down the thunder on ol' Barry?

I think Vegas is setting it at September 15th.

Anyone out there think this could happen?

Hey Disassociator!

"Fuck you asshole!"

/Ah-nold!

re: #89 DesertSage
I don't think the split between Charles and S&DM is irreparable. I do think that S&DM needs time to think things over though.

I agree. I hope something might be worked out between them.

I feel for Savage and backed him all the way the first time but he really did go too far. I wish him all good things, however. He is going through a lot and I hope it all works out for the best.

re: #94 SpartanWoman

I don't think we have to even wait that long. For example, the whole Jerusalem thing happened without the media asking anything. Even with the MSM in his back pocket, he's messing up all over the place. His sub-moronic (thank you great "progressive" jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes) choices of friends and mentors happened when he was working in absolute obscurity in Illinois. That is how bad this guy is. Without a teleprompter, as many, faster, observers have noted, he's an horrific speaker. This - will get oogly.

the sinner,

Charles

re: #63 DesertSage

This is why I can't stand Demonrats!

They completely twist every single position held by conservatives. I was starting to think that Democrats had some brains, what with all the conservative Democrats getting elected lately. But after seeing this clip, I know I still can't trust them.

Oh brother... what a load of ignorant, fear-mongering crap. The video, that is.

Someone should do an "I'm voting democrat" vid, only with factual, verifiable zings.

-"I'm voting democrat because I want to support a party that fought in favor of slavery. A party that fought to keep segregation and Jim Crow laws on the books".

re: #98 buzzsawmonkey

They might simply start asking him questions because they have the attention span of mayflies and will get bored with their adulation after a while--so they will try attack mode as a novelty.

And, if Obama knifes one of their own--which is probable, since it seems to be a reflex on his part--they will turn on him like rabid dogs.

Hope!

Change!

Please Don't Talk About Me When I'm Gone
--lyrics, Sidney Clare; music, Sam H. Stept

Please don't talk about me when I'm gone,
Though our friendship ceases from now on;
And, honey, if you can't say anything real nice,
It's better not to talk at all, is my advice.

We're parting, you go your way I'll go mine,
It's best that we do;
Here's a kiss! I hope that this brings lots of luck to you.

Makes no difference how I carry on,
Remember, please don't talk about me when I'm gone.

re: #103 Pvt Bin Jammin

I don't think the split between Charles and S&DM is irreparable. I do think that S&DM needs time to think things over though.

I agree. I hope something might be worked out between them.

I feel for Savage and backed him all the way the first time but he really did go too far. I wish him all good things, however. He is going through a lot and I hope it all works out for the best.

We all, sooner or later, go through "a lot". But when certain words are said and certain actions are threatened, nice guys need to head the other way.

re: #107 buzzsawmonkey

I'd really like to not talk about it, but unfortunately people keep asking.

Re Savage: I felt for him as well. G-d knows I might act the same way if I went through what he said he did. But I sure as hell wouldn't inflict my pain on a public forum in the form of ostensibly-credible death- and suicide-threats...especially if I was repeatedly warned not to do so by the admin.

He must be a very lonely person, and not have anyone to discuss his frustrations with other than Internet pals. I hope he gets help.

re: #102 Macker

Beat you to it by this [] much...

re: #109 Charles

I just pushed B-7 on the jukebox, and out it came.

Honest.

I have seen over the years the leniency Charles gives lizards that go off the tracks. I have never seen a lizard banned that did not push to get banned. (lizard being someone with a history of reasoned posts)

re: #109 Charles
I'm sorry to have talked about it. Were I in your shoes I would have done the same.

re: #111 Slumbering Behemoth

OK try this one.

re: #101 brainwizard73

hhheeeee's not Barry........Re:
hhre: #73 asu86pe

re: #109 Charles

I'd really like to not talk about it, but unfortunately people keep asking.

sorry Charles..I sure hope that,in this instance, curiosity doesn't kill the citizen..heh

re: #104 Charles the Hammer

the sinner,

Charles

Charles, are you an Orthodox Christian? They're the only people I've ever met who sign out that way.

(If I was honest with myself and G-d, I'd sign out, "The weak, self-indulgent, hypocritical sinner, MikalM.")

Senator Obama tries out for Footy Umpire....

Thanks zombie!

re: #117 joecitizen

Sorry here, too. As I said, I'm only on here in fits and spurts, and missed out on most of the action with those two regulars.

re: #118 mikalm

Charles, are you an Orthodox Christian? They're the only people I've ever met who sign out that way.

(If I was honest with myself and G-d, I'd sign out, "The weak, self-indulgent, hypocritical sinner, MikalM.")

don't be so hard on yourself..if there is a god,surely he/she/it has a sense of humor,no?

The Spy certainly is handy for watching people go through and rate posts. At least one creationist is getting busy tonight.

re: #119 Macker

Senator Obama tries out for

re: #115 Macker

Ha ha ha! I've actually never seen that film, but that scene was funny.

re: #122 Charles

The Spy certainly is handy for watching people go through and rate posts. At least one creationist is getting busy tonight.

imagine the havoc if they could ding multiple times..some people would never get any sleep...

re: #118 mikalm

Yes, I am. Though, I got my back piece before I found Orthodox (and a wife, though I met the wife first and, through her, was introduced to Orthodoxy). It is a fictional representation of Charles Martel charging the field and lancing a Moor at the Battle of Tours (really, Poitiers) October 25, 732. So, I usually go by Charles Martel or Charles the Hammer if there is already a Charles Martel. Given my druthers, I'd go back and get an Iconostasis on my back and wrapping around to my chest.

Ok, TMI. Sorry, I'm tired! How 'bout them Celtics?

the sinner,

Charles