May be these crazy people run his campaign too

Once the Obama folks read LGF, they'll take care of it. You really should charge a consulting fee.

There's a bad kind of crazy in the world today

Birds of a feather suck together.

This simply IS the demonrat party.

Socialists, Communists, Terrorists, Troofers, your bus is here.

I am afraid for this country.

Oi vey (and I'm not even Jewish)

I sure hope this election doesn't turn on the crazy vote.

Kos and effect.

Easily explained, Charles. Liberals all are insane to various degrees.
There's the sweet, (but totally lacking in common sense) libs that mean well, that form the backbone of the Democrat voting base, all the way up to the the foaming at the mouth Pinko-Commie libs. (Which seems to be the majority of the Democrat political leadership.)

Liberalism is insanity, and unfortunately it seems to be contagious.

Since when has a mainstream presidential candidate inspired such hate-driven stupidity amongst his followers? I really, really want to know. Did this happen with Mondale? With Carter? This just seems simply unprecedented to me.

convicted terrorist William Ayers

/I'm pretty sure he was never convicted, let alone charged, with anything

Post from Syed M. A. Shah's Blog:

i don't know why
By Syed from Irvine, CA - Jun 11th, 2008 at 11:26 am EDT

they deleted my post.

i said, DOWN WITH THE ZIONIST ENTITY, obama!

c'mon, don't turn on us now!

They're trying to out Huff Huffpo.

re: #13 Killian Bundy

Charged but let off on evidence mishandling.

What's the over/under on how long it takes for these to end up in the memory hole?

re: #13 Killian Bundy

/I'm pretty sure he was never convicted, let alone charged, with anything

/self confessed would be more accurate

re: #13 Killian Bundy

/I'm pretty sure he was never convicted, let alone charged, with anything

I think he meant to say "admitted" terrorist. "Unrepentant," "proud," or "famously crazy" would have been applicable adjectives, as well.

Taking the crazy out of the Deomcratic Party is like taking the meat out of a salami.

How can Obama delete his core beliefs?

Yep, as I noted earlier the UC Irvine chap is back and complaining about the fact that his "Push the Zionist entity into the sea" post got deleted, so he put it back up. [Link: my.barackobama.com...]

"Barry don't throw us under the bus!" lol

Did anyone over there think that maybe they would be justified in removing the blogging function from the website until they had a chance to implement it correctly?

The webmasters there appear to using the methods of liberal parents, give no guidance, provide no discipline, and expect your kids to be angels.

I read in a post here that mybarackobama has removed the search function, preventing searching of blogs. is this true? I'm lookin'

Crazy in the SCOTUS too?

Bringing it here
Obamas birth certificate HERE

How can you expect them to have the time to monitor their blogs when they're still using their resources to find a C level site administrator?

re: #24 unrealizedviewpoint

I read in a post here that mybarackobama has removed the search function, preventing searching of blogs. is this true? I'm lookin'

No, the search function is still there.

re: #21 maddogg

You mean he had any at any time in his life? That would be a surprise to me.

re: #13 Killian Bundy

/I'm pretty sure he was never convicted, let alone charged, with anything

Charges against Ayers had been dropped in 1978 but Ms. Dohrn still faces charges of aggravated battery and jumping bail.” [AP, 12/3/80]

Crazy has been in the air real thick lately.

Interesting.....[Link: hotair.com...]

I call Bullshit.

re: #13 Killian Bundy

/I'm pretty sure he was never convicted, let alone charged, with anything

His wife was, that I know for sure.

OT, but I love the Gorn pic, Charles!

If you can't vote for McCain, then vote against Obama.

You guys take a minute and say a prayer for our fellow Americans in the midwest, they are getting hammered, sorry for the OT! ;-)

Getting ever-scarier on a daily basis

The guy is what he is, he is one of these nuts!

re: #36 Kreuzueber Halbmond

good one

re: #37 'Nam Grunt

You guys take a minute and say a prayer for our fellow Americans in the midwest, they are getting hammered, sorry for the OT! ;-)

Yes, indeed....

Has anyone blamed George Bush yet?

re: #37 'Nam Grunt

You guys take a minute and say a prayer for our fellow Americans in the midwest, they are getting hammered, sorry for the OT! ;-)

Absolutely.

re: #33 joncelli

WTF is wrong with you? Leave that crap over at DKos.

Obama is a leftist candidate.

Why wouldn't there be anti-Semites aligned with him?

re: #26 Typicalwhitey

Bringing it here
Obamas birth certificate HERE

There's a spot in the right quadrant that looks like it says "JUN 6 2007" in reverse, as if it was stamped on the back.

It could indeed be authentic, but the seal cannot be found by my eyes.

Hell, Hell. As much as I dislike McCain, Barry sure puts a polish on him....

Come on now people, if they take these blogs down at his site, he will lose over half his support. Ain't no way thats gonna happen. They will just let Charles patrol them a bit and then delete the obviously bad ones. Pretty much everything else goes.

I have done an informal poll with my liberal co-workers (about 50 people) and over half of them are convinced that President Bush either directed 9/11 or knew about it in advance and did nothing to stop it. All but 2 of them are voiting for The Obama.

re: #26 Typicalwhitey

Bringing it here
Obamas birth certificate HERE

I will accept this as a tentative "proof". Given the history of such things, a document released by some random politically motivated person, when all other access to it has been denied, continues to be suspect.

re: #32 The Pulchritudinous Patriot,

It's like with the WAB "video" that didn't exist. The L³eftists are coming out with fake shit to defend against something that may not even be a problem. It means that they think that there could be a problem.

This is yet another example of BHO shooting himself in the foot out of pure stupidity. Like Kerry, he is refusing to release records that should be trivial. It makes one wonder what he is really hiding.

It is 5 months until the general election. Can the MSM avoid criticism of the Obama campaign for that long? The media needs to feed its 24 hr. appetite. This stuff will show up eventually.

re: #24 unrealizedviewpoint

I read in a post here that mybarackobama has removed the search
function, preventing searching of blogs. is this true? I'm lookin'

Use Google - you get some tools that the mybo search doesn't give you.

If you want to search for "Ayers" just go to google and type in:

Ayers site:barackobama.com

If you want to limit a date range, try

Ayers site:barackobama.com daterange:2454627-2454629

That daterange operator uses julian dates - the ones I put in are last tuesday to today. Use this site to calculate a julian date.

To exclude a word, put a minus in front

Ayers -foundation site:barackobama.com daterange:2454627-2454629

Many more operators out there for google.

re: #42 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

re: #43 BGOH

Don't quote deletable posts.

re: #50 Shr_Nfr

I will accept this as a tentative "proof". Given the history of such things, a document released by some random politically motivated person, when all other access to it has been denied, continues to be suspect.

I would be that the "o" either gave it to him or gave it to olbermann to give to kos

re: #7 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I am afraid for this country.

Games were used so each party could select the easiest-to-beat candidate from the opposing party.

re: #32 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Interesting.....[Link: hotair.com...]

I call Bullshit.

There is no doctors signature on it

re: #23 CyanSnowHawk

Did anyone over there think that maybe they would be justified in removing the blogging function from the website until they had a chance to implement it correctly?

The webmasters there appear to using the methods of liberal parents, give no guidance, provide no discipline, and expect your kids to be angels.

Diverse opinions - totally cool, dude.

do kos kiddies believe thats a real birth certificate?

re: #52 snowcrash

It is 5 months until the general election. Can the MSM avoid
criticism of the Obama campaign for that long? The media needs to feed
its 24 hr. appetite. This stuff will show up eventually.

Jim Hoagland at WaPo started opening MSM doubts on the Messiah today.

Read his oped. Hoagland carries a lot of weight for opinion setting.

Doubts are creeping in.

But what is important here is what this incident says about Obama, not about Johnson. The senator's initial reaction was to portray himself as too busy to keep up with the obscure financial doings of people who are not significant to the campaign and to belittle the media for asking him to "vet the vetters."

To treat Johnson, Holder and Kennedy suddenly as mere fact-checkers is as disingenuous as it is ungracious. Obama is clearly the most intelligent candidate of either party since Bill Clinton. But he can outsmart himself if he goes on expecting the media and the public to accept just about any explanation he gives.

Yes, he can.

re: #57 bulwrk

There is no doctors signature on it

I know what my birth certificate looks like and it sure 'aint that.

Being a know it all means never having to check facts for do a background check on the people who work for you.

To give a historical example of what happens with a know it all attitude we can to an event prior to the commencement of the Second War War.

The Wehrmacht had printed a French edition of it's primary work on the theory of armored warfare and gave copies of them to the French Army for distribution to their garrison libraries. A year later the German military attache went through the libraries to see who checked out the book. Most copies had never been touched. The few that were checked out had been read by lowly lieutenants.

The leadership of the French Army believed that they knew it all.

They lost the war of 1940.

Of course past performance is no indication of future results.

How did Kos wind up with Obama's birth certificate on his kooky site when it wasn't being given out?

[Link: www.dailykos.com...]

It all looks way too perfect to me.

Oh boy, are we Lizards going to be seeing a throbbing birth certificate soon?

Sure hope so, heh.

re: #59 bulwrk

do kos kiddies believe thats a real birth certificate?

Of course they do!

HOPE =

re: #65 Typicalwhitey

Then kos is the saudi arabia of stupid a real birth certificate contains much more info.

re: #50 Shr_Nfr

Looking at it, it appears to be a photoshop. Given the date, it would have been typed on the greenbar paper with a typewriter. However, please note that the greenbar does not extend under the name at various places. For instance in the "AMA" on OBAMA and "BAR" in "BARACK". It does however extend under "OAHU" and the time of birth. Both would have had to have been filled in using the same method. The mother's name also has such problems although the father's name is more convincing. Perhaps compression problems given that its a jpeg, perhaps fraud. I remain unconvinced. Given that is the names that have major greenbar problems and the a lot of the rest of the certificate does not, I do not think that it convinces me yet.

I am also unconvinced that this form was filled in by what would have had to have been a typewriter. Perhaps it is vaguely possible that it was an IBM Selectric I that was introduced by IBM on July 23, 1961. However, that model did not have dual pitch and would have required that the "golf ball" be replaced to generate the different pitched fonts. As I say, I remain unconvinced by this document.

re: #68 Shr_Nfr

Looking at it, it appears to be a photoshop. Given the date, it would have been typed on the greenbar paper with a typewriter. However, please note that the greenbar does not extend under the name at various places. For instance in the "AMA" on OBAMA and "BAR" in "BARACK". It does however extend under "OAHU" and the time of birth. Both would have had to have been filled in using the same method. The mother's name also has such problems although the father's name is more convincing. Perhaps compression problems given that its a jpeg, perhaps fraud. I remain unconvinced. Given that is the names that have major greenbar problems and the a lot of the rest of the certificate does not, I do not think that it convinces me yet.

I am also unconvinced that this form was filled in by what would have had to have been a typewriter. Perhaps it is vaguely possible that it was an IBM Selectric I that was introduced by IBM on July 23, 1961. However, that model did not have dual pitch and would have required that the "golf ball" be replaced to generate the different pitched fonts. As I say, I remain unconvinced by this document.

Maybe that is just a copy gotten from the registrars office?

these hate bloggers feel at home on the b.o. official site.
his speech and conduct has made them feel welcome.
and but for the bad publicity none of this bilge would be under the bus.
b.o. and his handlers did nothing until they were exposed.

re: #69 Typicalwhitey

It all too perfectly fits in doesn't it? I got a copy of my birth certificate from Massachusetts a few years back and it listed my parents' occupations and the name of the doctor present at the birth.

re: #50 Shr_Nfr

Not buying it. No one in the 1960s used the word "AFRICAN" to describe a black persons race. It was either "colored" or "negro".

Another photochop job.

I note the fact that the birth certificate says "laser" in the corner and has no evidence of a raised seal. I know the original of my birth certificate is on file with the City of New York, and that a request for a copy will get you exactly that, a copy. I do not know what you will get for a request in Hawaii.

The fact that this says laser on it obviously attests to the fact that it is not a copy of the original. Maybe its what you get when you request one, but I would like that confirmed. I also find the lack of a raised seal disturbing.

re: #68 Shr_Nfr

Looking at it, it appears to be a photoshop. Given the date, it would have been typed on the greenbar paper with a typewriter. However, please note that the greenbar does not extend under the name at various places. For instance in the "AMA" on OBAMA and "BAR" in "BARACK". It does however extend under "OAHU" and the time of birth. Both would have had to have been filled in using the same method. The mother's name also has such problems although the father's name is more convincing. Perhaps compression problems given that its a jpeg, perhaps fraud. I remain unconvinced. Given that is the names that have major greenbar problems and the a lot of the rest of the certificate does not, I do not think that it convinces me yet.

I am also unconvinced that this form was filled in by what would have had to have been a typewriter. Perhaps it is vaguely possible that it was an IBM Selectric I that was introduced by IBM on July 23, 1961. However, that model did not have dual pitch and would have required that the "golf ball" be replaced to generate the different pitched fonts. As I say, I remain unconvinced by this document.

There is another big problem with this document. Note the father's race - "African." In 1961 his race would have been listed everywhere as "negro". Today in the US it would more likely be listed as "black" but specifically not "African." African is not a race. There are many millions of Africans who are caucasian or asian rather than black.

re: #74 galloping granny

There is another big problem with this document. Note the father's race - "African." In 1961 his race would have been listed everywhere as "negro". Today in the US it would more likely be listed as "black" but specifically not "African." African is not a race. There are many millions of Africans who are caucasian or asian rather than black.

Great minds think alike. See my #72

re: #72 JohnnyReb

Not buying it. No one in the 1960s used the word "AFRICAN" to describe a black persons race. It was either "colored" or "negro".

Another photochop job.

"Colored" was not what one used to describe those of the Negro race in the 60's. That is a medical/scientific classification - caucasian, asian, negroid.

re: #74 galloping granny

Did they redact their database to be PC. It would not surprise me.

re: #75 JohnnyReb

Great minds think alike. See my #72

The other really big thing is the complete lack of certification. Even a laser generated copy of the information on file would have an impressed seal and the signature of the certifying official.

re: #77 Shr_Nfr

Did they redact their database to be PC. It would not surprise me.

Even if they changed their database to be PC, he would be listed as "black" not "African."

re: #76 galloping granny

I have my birth certificate from Ohio and there are 3 choices for race on it white, colored, other. Thats it no other choices. Might differ from state to state I think.

re: #71 satan sidekick

It all too perfectly fits in doesn't it? I got a copy of my birth certificate from Massachusetts a few years back and it listed my parents' occupations and the name of the doctor present at the birth.

Should also list your parent's place of residence, your parent's place & possibly date of birth and the hospital in which you were born. Some long forms even include the names of your grandparents.

re: #80 JohnnyReb

I have my birth certificate from Ohio and there are 3 choices for race on it white, colored, other. Thats it no other choices. Might differ from state to state I think.

Might perhaps differ as to "colored" or "negro". But I can guarantee you that none of them said "African."

re: #37 'Nam Grunt

You guys take a minute and say a prayer for our fellow Americans in the midwest, they are getting hammered, sorry for the OT! ;-)

Thanks, 'Nam Grunt! Right now Omaha is pretty quiet. Last night, though, was a doozy. And it runs out that three of the four Boy Scouts killed at the Boy Scout Camp near Little Sioux, IA were Omaha kids. I feel so bad for the parents who spent last night racing from hospital to hospital to find their kids. :-(

Official OMB standards for race: [Link: www.whitehouse.gov...]

re: #83 samsgran1948

Thanks, 'Nam Grunt! Right now Omaha is pretty quiet. Last night, though, was a doozy. And it runs turns out that three of the four Boy Scouts killed at the Boy Scout Camp near Little Sioux, IA were Omaha kids. I feel so bad for the parents who spent last night racing from hospital to hospital to find their kids. :-(

PIMF!

re: #84 Shr_Nfr

Official OMB standards for race: [Link: www.whitehouse.gov...]

These are the latest "official federal standards" not the ones that are in use universally in all states and certainly not what was in use in 1961.

we do not have a lobby-we do not need a lobby. We control everything- we are so powerful we control you without you knowing.

Love
Your Zionist Overlords.

re: #82 galloping granny

100% agree with that.

Charles, I think they are letting you be their "appropriate blog watchdog." Let's see how long until they take these down. And when they do, send them a bill.

CAIR calls on Obama to denounce "Islamophobia"

By which they mean, of course, not simply irrational prejudice against Muslims, but any honest examination of the elements of Islam that jihadists use to justify violence against non-Muslims and Islamic supremacism. We have seen this again and again.

"Obama aides grilled in Dearborn: In talk with Chaldeans, Arab-Americans assertion made that candidate has ignored Islamophobia," by Gregg Krupa for The Detroit News, June 12 (thanks to Paul):

[...] The three Obama aides who attended the meeting also were challenged about the perception that he fails to denounce Islamophobia, even when he points out publicly that he has been targeted by prejudiced Internet bloggers, in particular, who continue to assert that he is Muslim.

"We are waiting for him to decry this Islamophobia as anti-American, just as anti-Semitism is anti-American," said Dawud Walid, of the Council on American Islamic Relations. "To simply say that he is a Christian and not to criticize Islamophobia is akin to passively supporting Islamophobia. He has to address publicly the roots of these concerns."...

[Link: jihadwatch.org...]

The Obama site's terms of service seem pretty clear on the subject...

User-Contributed Content
Content posted on our Website by our users is not guaranteed by us as to accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, and we do not endorse any content posted by our users. It is the responsibility of our Website users to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any content posted on our Website by other users.

...

You may not post or otherwise make available on our Website any content that is illegal, obscene, threatening, defamatory, or otherwise injurious to third parties. You may not impersonate any person or entity, or otherwise mislead as to the origin of your content. Further, you may not make use of our services to forge e-mail headers, or send bulk unsolicited e-mail messages. We have the right, but not the obligation, to monitor the content posted on our Website to determine compliance with our Terms of Service and/or to satisfy any law, regulation or government request. We have the right, in our sole discretion, to edit, refuse to post or remove any material submitted to or posted on our Website including, but not limited to, material that is unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, graphic, or otherwise objectionable.

test