Here we go again, as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) joins forces with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) to concoct another fraudulent “survey:” For the Record: American Muslim Brotherhood Looks to Cook the Books, Again.

This time they’re claiming it’s “the first comprehensive survey of its kind,” which is simply a lie. And both of these groups are unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas funding trial. But expect the mainstream media to swallow this “new survey” whole, like they swallow all the other lies, without informing the public about the terrorist ties and radical ideology of these groups.

On June 12, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) announced its intentions, along with a broad coalition of Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations (including the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Public Affairs Council and the Islamic Circle of North America) to initiate a “nationwide census project, the first comprehensive survey of its kind, intended to collect accurate data about America’s mosques.”

That statement is particularly curious considering that CAIR, in 2001, issued a report titled, “The Mosque in America,“ which stated as its mission to present the:

…findings from the Mosque Study Project 2000, the largest, most comprehensive survey of mosques ever to be conducted in the United States. The purpose of the Study is twofold: to provide a comprehensive, detailed portrait of mosques, which can be subsequently used by mosque leaders and Muslim scholars to envision ways to strengthen mosques. Secondly the Study provides a public profile of mosques that will hopefully further the understanding of the Muslim presence in America. (emphasis added)

So in 2001, CAIR gave us the ”most comprehensive survey of mosques ever to be conducted in the United States“ and now they are promising ”the first comprehensive survey of its kind” on American mosques. So which is it? Are they admitting that the first report was, indeed, non-comprehensive?