LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

McCain Proposes Nuclear Power, Jane Fonda Has Nightmares

Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:02:19 pm PDT

John McCain proposes to destroy the world (kidding): McCain says wants 45 new nuclear reactors by 2030.

SPRINGFIELD, Missouri (Reuters) - Republican John McCain would put the United States on course to build 45 new nuclear reactors by 2030 if elected president, the Arizona senator said on Wednesday.

McCain, his party’s presumptive nominee in this fall’s presidential election, is laying out his plan to make the country energy independent.

“If I am elected president, I will set this nation on a course to building 45 new reactors by the year 2030, with the ultimate goal of 100 new plants to power the homes and factories and cities of America,” he said.

Advertisement

481 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:03:15pm

Thank god, I was running out of tact.

2 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:03:19pm
“If I am elected president, I will set this nation on a course to building 45 new reactors by the year 2030, with the ultimate goal of 100 new plants to power the homes and factories and cities of America,” he said.

So introduce the legislation tomorrow

3 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:03:22pm

Good for him.

More nuclear power...

4 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:03:50pm

More Nukes. Less Kooks

5 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:04:21pm

A nuke in every garage.

6 Sharmuta  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:04:28pm

Ah- the evolution of American Energy policy.

7 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:04:45pm

re: #2 Shug

So introduce the legislation tomorrow

If only it were that easy.

8 snowcrash  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:04:50pm

Springfield? The Simpsons live there.

9 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:05:06pm

That's nice but I still want to see Geosynchronous Power Satellites too.

10 jaunte  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:05:17pm

Well, that'll take care of Al Gore's house; what about the rest of us?

11 goddessoftheclassroom  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:05:34pm

re: #8 snowcrash

Springfield? The Simpsons live there.

So did the Andersons of Father Knows Best.

12 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:05:35pm

Good for it, John S.!

13 NoSpam  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:05:45pm

FOR SCIENCE!

14 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:05:48pm

But...but...doesn't this conflict with his mankind-is-killing-the-earth stance?

15 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:05:50pm

re: #10 jaunte

Well, that'll take care of Al Gore's house; what about the rest of us?

Wind power!

16 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:06:00pm

re: #7 psyop

If only it were that easy.

exactly.

17 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:06:13pm

From Things 1101 Through 1125 That Mr. Welch is not allowed to do in a roleplaying game:

[Link: theglen.livejournal.com...]

1101. I will not cut the vault guards in on the haul instead of fighting them.

1103. Just because I was paid in advance doesn’t mean I can let the incompetent expedition leader die.

1104. There is a limit to how much innuendo I can fit into one combat round.

1107. I will not attempt to clear out the dungeon using only Bangalore torpedoes.

1108. Picking his pocket means more than just turning him upside down and shaking him vigorously.

1113. I will not shoot vampires in the chest with a large pistol just so they have to explain the embarrassing sucking chest wound.

1114. I will not take a phobia of anything that doesn’t exist in the game world.

1117. Can’t strangle a werewolf with a roll of Kodak film, no matter what we all know it’s made out of.

1118. In the middle of a black ops I will not use up all the claymores just because I don’t want to take them back with me.

1119. I cannot have my mercy surgically removed.

1120. Even if I’m in charge I can’t order the Assault Lance to perform West Side Story dance routines.

1123. In the middle of a black ops I can’t call my girlfriend to remind her to pick up some Chinese on her way home.

1124. I will leave out mating rituals when presenting a cultural exchange with diplomatic ambassadors.

1125. Letting the Red Shirt guard the plane is really frowned upon as it doesn’t leave anybody to sacrifice to the Shoggoths.

18 Olderthandirt  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:06:23pm

Will Hanoi Jane now leave this country to live in one more suitable for her lifestyle, perhaps either Vietnam or North Korea?

19 DesertSage  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:06:28pm

re: #6 Sharmuta

Ah- the evolution of American Energy policy.

And the evolution of John McCain.

20 jaunte  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:06:32pm

re: #15 psyop

Wind power!

...blows.

21 NoSpam  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:06:33pm

re: #8 snowcrash

Springfield? The Simpsons live there.


"Nucular, Lisa. It's pronounced 'Nucular.'"

22 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:06:39pm

Eff Yeah.

23 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:07:27pm

re: #19 DesertSage

Unlike most of these idiots, McCain can learn and grow.

24 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:07:45pm

re: #18 Olderthandirt

Will Hanoi Jane now leave this country to live in one more suitable for her lifestyle, perhaps either Vietnam or North Korea?

Nah. She'll get a facelift. She's looking for lovin'...

25 itellu3times  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:07:49pm

Can't live with it, can't live without it:

Evolution Sea Cruise

26 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:07:50pm

re: #14 Cartman

But...but...doesn't this conflict with his mankind-is-killing-the-earth stance?

No, it actually uses some of the co2 crap as part of the argument for nuclear. As in, nuke plants don't release carbon dioxide, so more is better.

Brilliant, if you think about it.

27 Sharmuta  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:08:30pm

re: #19 DesertSage

And the evolution of John McCain.

It was predictable....and now he'll be put to the test. ;)

28 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:08:41pm

re: #23 MikeySDCA

Unlike most of these idiots, McCain can learn and grow.

But will he become a Lizard?

29 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:08:49pm

re: #9 The Other Les

That's nice but I still want to see Geosynchronous Power Satellites too.

And I want to see Al Gore on the moon. Maybe Mars.

30 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:08:52pm

re: #20 jaunte

...blows.

...in a good way?

31 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:03pm

re: #28 The Other Les

Patience.

32 Desert Dog[deleted]  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:07pm
33 shibumi  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:25pm

If the French can do nuclear energy safely, the U.S. should be able to do it safely as well.

Drill now.
Build new nuke plants.
Become energy independent.
Screw the jihadis.

34 tblot  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:35pm

That sounds great for the Necular Power but is McCain pandering like Obama
This is going to a strange november

35 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:44pm

re: #33 shibumi

If the French can do nuclear energy safely, the U.S. should be able to do it safely as well.

Drill now.
Build new nuke plants.
Become energy independent.
Screw the jihadis.

Second!

36 Seraphym  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:44pm
Jane Fonda Has Nightmares

Hanoi Jane is getting what she deserves for posing on top of NVA tanks while McCain was getting his teeth knocked out.
Disclaimer: I have no idea if these two events actually happened at the same time

So long as we get to keep any mutated frogs as neighborhood mascots, they can build an Integral Fast Reactor right down the street from my house if it'll reduce our dependence on foreign oil, or oil in general.

~S~

37 Macker  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:44pm

Watch what the Donks will do next...threaten to Nationalize the Nuclear Power Industry!

/GD_Demo☭RATS!

38 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:09:56pm

re: #29 HelloDare

And I want to see Al Gore on the moon. Maybe Mars.

Pluto!

Save Mars for the rest of us!

39 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:10:01pm

Science Uber Allis
/fascist

40 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:10:07pm

re: #33 shibumi

Yes!

41 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:10:12pm

re: #32 Desert Dog

I propose we put Hanoi Jane in a jet fighter and let John McCain shoot her down with a 1960's Soviet vintage AA cannon.....

Like this one

42 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:10:13pm

re: #18 Olderthandirt

Will Hanoi Jane now leave this country to live in one more suitable for her lifestyle, perhaps either Vietnam or North Korea?

or a safe nuke free nation like France

oh wait

43 jaunte  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:10:46pm

re: #30 psyop

I think the premise would be good if we were much richer and had a much smaller population, but as things stand it's a net energy sink to make people feel like they're doing something 'sustainable.'

44 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:11:15pm

There goes the hippie vote.

Seriously, get the Yucca Mountain waste depository up and running; we can't leave spent fuel rods in the water ponds at every reactor, it is way too big a security risk.

45 FamHistoryGuy  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:11:28pm

re: #24 The Other Les

I can only now contemplate her without foaming at the mouth.

SEA 1967-1975 Aircraft Armament Systems

46 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:11:50pm

re: #43 jaunte

I think the premise would be good if we were much richer and had a much smaller population, but as things stand it's a net energy sink to make people feel like they're doing something 'sustainable.'

As long as the wind farms aren't anywhere near where members of congress live...

47 Dahveed  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:11:57pm
Jane Fonda Has Nightmares

Anything we can do to get Susan Sarandon off to Canada and Jane Fonda having nightmares is so worth it.

48 Kreuzueber Halbmond  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:12:17pm
if elected president

But if he stays a Senator, all bets are off I bet.

49 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:12:23pm

re: #44 Ojoe

Thank you very much for raising the main problem.

50 azcon  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:12:31pm
51 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:13:24pm

re: #49 MikeySDCA

That's a HUGE problem

But problems are not much discussed by politicians

52 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:13:46pm

re: #49 MikeySDCA

And, you are welcome.

53 Seraphym  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:13:48pm

re: #15 psyop

re: #10 jaunte

If we could get Gore to open his pie hole for about half a minute per minute on how he invented the internet and deserves 45 reactors all to himself, we'd get all the hurricane-strength hot air we'd need for those turbines right there.

Win-win.

54 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:13:51pm

re: #50 azcon

France has 59.

More important than the number of reactors is the percentage of power by consumption of the nation.

France, somewhere near 80, the U.S. somewhere near 20.

55 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:14:20pm

I love all these promises guys make about getting things done over 25 years. Over 50 years.

'we're gonna save 2 trillion over 10 years", (with 9.9 trillion saved in the 10th year )

I call Bullshit.

56 shibumi  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:14:30pm

re: #34 tblot


This is going to a strange november

It's been a strange election season so far IMHO.

57 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:14:32pm

re: #54 psyop

And, they are much more stylish and posh than ours too

58 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:14:40pm

Speaking of Jane Fonda, here's a classic cut from her ex-hubby Ted Turner on Kim Jung Il.

59 Gordan the Fisherman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:14:51pm

At least now there is one reason to vote for him...well maybe...right?

Anyone?

60 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:14:53pm

re: #51 Ojoe

True. It's the biggest problem, because it lasts close enough to forever.

61 MandyManners  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:14:55pm
62 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:15:08pm

re: #57 Desert Dog

And, they are much more stylish and posh than ours too

Well, they are French, after all....

63 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:15:31pm

re: #59 Gordan the Fisherman

I will vote for him.

64 George guy  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:15:40pm

And then, they need to bring us a nuclear SUV.

The 2012 Ford Armageddon.

65 Seraphym  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:16:08pm

re: #64 George guy

And then, they need to bring us a nuclear SUV.

The 2012 Ford Armageddon.

Not for sale in Iran.

66 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:16:28pm

re: #61 MandyManners

I wonder if Donald Sutherland still has nightmares.

No, he's a far lefty, too.

67 Kreuzueber Halbmond  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:16:33pm

re: #55 Shug

I call Bullshit.

Nice call.

68 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:16:40pm

re: #64 George guy

And then, they need to bring us a nuclear SUV.

The 2012 Ford Armageddon.

Like their pinto I don't want to rear end that car

69 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:16:44pm

re: #65 Seraphym

Not for sale in Iran.

made in Iran, but for export only to the US

70 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:16:44pm

re: #45 FamHistoryGuy

I can only now contemplate her without foaming at the mouth.

SEA 1967-1975 Aircraft Armament Systems

The only time ever I heard by Dad utter the "C" word, it was directed at Hanoi Jane. At first, I was shocked, as Pop was not one prone to profanity. He despised her, as do I. Like Father, like Son I guess.

71 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:16:46pm

Well, this is all very good and well, but it isn't going to put gas in my tank or in the tank of the semi-trucks and airplanes, since we don't burn oil for electricity. There has to be a comparable push by industry to develop electric or hybrid engines that are a hell of a lot better than now. Although, maybe it could reduce the cost of electricity enough to make hydrogen fuel cells more attractive.

If he wants to make this a truly helpful plan, he needs to introduce a companion package of incentives to spur research, too.

We don't have a problem securing electricity. We have a problem getting oil.

72 George guy  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:17:10pm

re: #65 Seraphym

Not for sale in Iran.

Why not? All the Blackwater employees are going to want one when they're over there.

73 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:17:30pm

McCain Proposes Nuclear Power

C'mon Johnny, get angry.

74 Banner  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:17:42pm

Now THAT I can vote for!

Finally! Someone with a little sense. Now just drill off shore too.

75 Seraphym  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:17:57pm

re: #69 Desert Dog

made in Iran, but for export only to the US

In that case, it better be an SSTAR.

76 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:18:31pm

re: #71 angst

Sorry, but where I live, our electricity mostly comes from oil.

77 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:18:38pm

re: #75 Seraphym

In that case, it better be an SSTAR.

I believe that will come standard with each "Armageddon"

78 SasquatchOnSteroids  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:18:55pm

The Barackracy will never allow it.
Turn your thermostat up or down accordingly.
Ride a bike (insert air here).
Ratchet your life back for the good of the world.

Fuck that. Build 400 of 'em.

79 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:18:57pm

re: #71 angst

Well, this is all very good and well, but it isn't going to put gas in my tank or in the tank of the semi-trucks and airplanes, since we don't burn oil for electricity.

The point of nuclear is not transportation.

We use energy for everything, like the computer you are looking at right now. If oil could be removed from everything BUT transportation, it would save hundreds of millions of barrels of oil.

Suddenly, we wouldn't be dependent on anyone else for our energy....

80 mattm  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:19:00pm

So, why is Jane Fonda not in Prison or dead for treason?

81 Opilio  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:19:20pm

The 823 billion kilowatt-hours of nuclear electricity generated in the United States during 2006 was more than the nation’s entire electrical output in the early 1960s.

Opiliofact™

82 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:19:27pm

re: #60 MikeySDCA

Well also it is a problem because our bodies incorporate elements and molecules into our biological systems based on the surface characteristics of the atoms; we cannot detect a difference in an isotope, so there is no way to prevent the uptake of radioactive stuff; and some of it accumulates up the food chain.

It is a tricky business keeping the long-lived nuclear wastes out of the biosphere, and if we are not very good at it, future generations may curse the memory of us.

That's all I'm going to say on this.

83 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:20:34pm

re: #80 mattm

So, why is Jane Fonda not in Prison or dead for treason?

The same reason HE has not be jailed

84 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:20:38pm

re: #71 angst

Well, this is all very good and well, but it isn't going to put gas in my tank or in the tank of the semi-trucks and airplanes, since we don't burn oil for electricity. There has to be a comparable push by industry to develop electric or hybrid engines that are a hell of a lot better than now. Although, maybe it could reduce the cost of electricity enough to make hydrogen fuel cells more attractive.

If he wants to make this a truly helpful plan, he needs to introduce a companion package of incentives to spur research, too.

We don't have a problem securing electricity. We have a problem getting oil.

Yes, we do. We burn ALOT of oil to make electricity...

85 DesertSage  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:20:40pm

"If you understood what Communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that one day we would become Communist."

~ Jane Fonda - 1970

86 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:20:51pm

re: #64 George guy

And then, they need to bring us a nuclear SUV.

The 2012 Ford Armageddon.

How about the Ford Nucleon?

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

87 Killian Bundy  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:21:05pm

From IBD:

Nine GOP senators asked Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to delay consideration of a major housing rescue bill, citing “recent allegations related to Countrywide Financial.” Several Democratic lawmakers have admitted getting home loans with help from Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo, though they claim they received no special treatment.

/hey, I always contact the CEO of the lender when I need a home loan, don't you?

88 rawmuse  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:21:23pm

At least he is not telling us to go shiver in the dark like the Dems.

90 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:21:51pm

re: #80 mattm

If they bust her, they have to bust half of the democrat party.]
Whose gonna run the post offices if they are all in the pen?

I am amazed today at the dem response to Bush's call to drill for american oil. Basically the crickets chirping drown out any substantive comment.

wow.

91 Purple Prose  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:22:20pm

Do we take a woman who shamelessly courted wet dreams as an authority on nightmares?

[Link: www.berting.nl...]

Do we take a woman who shamelessly courted wet dreams AND consorted with enemies in a time of war as an authority on nightmares?

[Link: www.wellesley.edu...]

Do we take a woman who shamelessly courted wet dreams AND consorted with enemies in a time of war AND married one of the founders of SDS and inspirations of the Weathermen as an authority on nightmares?

[Link: www.wellesley.edu...]

She may not know a nightmare from a wet dream, but it sure looks like she and those like her are a nightmare for anyone with any shred of decency and commonsense.

92 rwmofo  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:22:28pm

The left always wants us to model ourselves after Europeans, so McCain can go nuclear and the left will like him.

Oh, wait. Since McCain is a conservative, the left will accuse him of being in the pocket of "Big Nukes."

So let's nuke the polar bears.

93 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:23:10pm

re: #82 Ojoe

Your knowledge of the subject is much greater that mine. I just know enough to bet stark scared.

94 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:23:11pm

When one melts down, remember to just Duck and Cover

95 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:23:19pm

re: #80 mattm

So, why is Jane Fonda not in Prison or dead for treason?

Ask President Nixon. She did her thing on his watch.

This is one of my long standing complaints about the Republican Party, that they were soft on treason.

96 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:23:53pm

re: #89 Noam Sayin'

They don't make them like that any more.

97 Wm T Sherman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:23:58pm

Only 45 nuclear plants? Ah well, baby steps. Twenty-three years is a long time.

There have been a few of interesting developments.

1. Fail-safe nuclear reactors.

2. A proposed scheme for fast-neutron reactors that can burn high-level nuclear waste for fuel. Nearly 100% of the uranium eventually gets burned, including all the uranium 238.

3. Direct thermal conversion schemes for separating water into hydrogen and oxygen -- thermodynamic efficiency could approach 75%. No electrolysis, just heat and chemistry. Instead of converting heat to electricity at 30% thermal efficiency and then electrolyzing water, just use the heat directly.

Keep in mind, the shit has not really hit the fan yet in terms of energy supplies. You ain't seen noting yet. If alternatives are not available, it will get done.

98 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:24:11pm

re: #76 MikeySDCA

Sorry, but where I live, our electricity mostly comes from oil.

Where is that? I have a lot of low-sulfur coal I can hook you up with!
Seriously, the majority of our electricity comes from coal, hydro, wind, etc. I'm not saying that the nuke plants are worthless, just that they aren't going to give us energy independence.

99 Wookieelips  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:24:25pm

re: #85 DesertSage

"If you understood what Communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that one day we would become Communist."

~ Jane Fonda - 1970

Ah, the words of a woman made rich from capatalist pigs who paid to see her movies.

100 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:24:45pm

re: #92 rwmofo


I've always advocated nuking the gay whales.

The dems want to nationalize the oil industry? what's up with that?
I mean, the same crowd that runs such sterling services as the post office and social security?

101 freetoken  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:24:47pm

re: #74 Banner

Now just drill off shore too.

Not expected to be a significant source of oil or impact on prices:

[Link: www.eia.doe.gov...]


I concur with Sen. McCain - we need to greatly increase our electricity generation to deal with mitigating any loss of imported oil.

102 Seraphym  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:24:53pm

re: #77 Desert Dog

I believe that will come standard with each "Armageddon"

Do the Iranian-made Ford "Armageddons" come with little Hidden Imam-approved Blu-Ray Screens? Wouldn't be an Iranian Armageddon without the 12th!

So long as the that friggin' Imam didn't bug me 5 times a day to pray, it sounds like a fun family-trip car. Millions of miles on a single fuel fill-up!

103 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:24:59pm

re: #85 DesertSage

"If you understood what Communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that one day we would become Communist."

~ Jane Fonda - 1970

No.

If everyone understood what Communism was, the Communists would be hunted down and exterminated.

104 George guy  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:25:19pm

re: #86 The Other Les

How about the Ford Nucleon?

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Our cultural demands have changed since the '50s.

105 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:25:49pm

re: #93 MikeySDCA

Nuclear power is a Faustian bargain in the long run if you ask me.

If you asked me to do right by my children and their possible descendants, I'd cut back on energy use and drill for more oil, and use more coal, and develop solar, before I'd build another nuke plant.

106 experiencedtraveller  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:26:34pm

Nuclear engineering continuously advances.

Yet NIMBY will crush it in the America we live in. No matter how bravely John McCain leads.

To go nuclear we must master efficient distribution.

Then we can build all of em in North Dakota.

/No disrespect to ND. 'Nuke City' would generate gazillions in local revenue...

107 rwmofo  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:26:56pm

re: #87 Killian Bundy

My guess is that the MSM researchers are furiously combing through any records they can find on Republicans ONLY in order to make this a bipartisan issue. If they can bring in just ONE Republican, objective met.

108 MandyManners  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:27:27pm

re: #66 HelloDare

No, he's a far lefty, too.

Really?

109 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:27:44pm

The Ford Nucleon

Found
On
Road
Decaying

110 cutestguy[deleted]  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:28:05pm
111 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:28:10pm

re: #98 angst

Don't be an idiot. I'm in San Diego, CA. Look at a map and consider what it would take to get the coal here.

We have a nuke plant at San Onofre, but I'am at the south end of the county, and we have an oil-fired plant as our primary source.

112 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:28:54pm

re: #106 experiencedtraveller

Maybe we need to so something about NIMBY's.

113 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:29:11pm

As I recall in that movie, Hanoi Jane and her lunatic costar Jack Lemmon conjectured that the melting core would burn down through the earth to China, then reverse and continue to bounce through the earth's mantle until our dear planet was little more than swiss cheese.

Moonbattery never changes.

114 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:29:28pm

re: #102 Seraphym

What about the plastic mohammeds on the dashboard? with bobble-turbans and a 9 year old "wife" kneeling in front....

you get the picture.

Hey, anyone know a plastics manufacturer? I might just get a patent on that !

115 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:29:31pm

According to the DOE, 1.6% of our electricity comes from oil. Scroll down for graph.

Like I said, we need to figure out how to replace gasoline with electricity for this to help much.

116 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:29:38pm

re: #109 Shug

The Ford Nucleon

Found
On
Road
Decaying

LOL!

117 MandyManners  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:30:09pm

re: #85 DesertSage

"If you understood what Communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that one day we would become Communist."

~ Jane Fonda - 1970

I'll never forget the dinner when I told my folks that I admired Jane Fonda.

118 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:30:18pm

re: #105 Ojoe

"Cut back on energy use" is easy to say, but nobody seems to have an ideas about how to do that which would inconvenience themselves. Myself included.

119 experiencedtraveller  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:30:31pm

re: #112 The Other Les

Maybe we need to so something about NIMBY's.

Throw em on the grill?

120 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:30:41pm

re: #111 MikeySDCA

Don't be an idiot. I'm in San Diego, CA. Look at a map and consider what it would take to get the coal here.

We have a nuke plant at San Onofre, but I'am at the south end of the county, and we have an oil-fired plant as our primary source.

I'm not an idiot. Look at my last post. I used to live in San Diego, btw, I hope to make it back for a class reunion this fall.

121 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:31:18pm

re: #113 really grumpy big dog Johnson

And as I recall, didn't that movie come out just before Three Mile Island?

122 mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:31:26pm

Nuclear plants making gigawatts of electricity to enable the hydrogen economy and then we can all drive fuel cell electric cars and tell the oil ticks to suck it. I am down with that! They can even put one in my backyard.

123 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:31:41pm

Huh. I posted that story in the spinoff links on I think the prior thread earlier this evening and didn't see any mention of Jane Fonda nor did I see any mention of Hanoi Jane in the aricle Charles linked to.
But my reaction is still the same - 45 additional nuke reactors would be nice, but there are 104 nuke plants already in operation and they ONLY supply 20% of our electrical energy and McCain is talking about increasing the number of reactors by barely 40% over a 22 year timetable.
It's not enough.
It's not soon enough.
For cryin' out loud FRANCE produces over 70% of it's electrical power with nuke reactors, why can't we AT LEAST match the French and sooner than in 22 years?
Mind you, I'm glad McCain has awakened to the energy independance problem, what with this and off -shore drilling but this is all gonna take too long and at the end of the day still leave us energy dependant on foreign supplies.
Crap.

124 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:31:52pm

re: #114 sojerofgod

sorta been done already

125 DesertSage  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:31:57pm

re: #117 MandyManners

I'll never forget the dinner when I told my folks that I admired Jane Fonda.

I liked her in Barbarella.

126 rwmofo  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:32:29pm

Alternative Energy Source:

1) Convert a treadmill into a power generator.
2) Put Michael Moore on the treadmill and dangle a pizza in front of him.

127 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:32:44pm

re: #125 DesertSage

I liked her in Barbarella.

I liked when they cut her

128 LEGION  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:32:53pm

Fonda is the nightmare of this country! She is evil and should be ignored. Build Johnny boy, BUILD!

129 Dustyvet  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:32:54pm

Jane Fonda has nightmares? What the sale of Hanoi Jane Fonda urinal targets going up again?

130 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:32:56pm

re: #118 MikeySDCA

Cut back on energy use.... is tantamount to saying collapse the economy, destroy the middle class. make citizens into serfs, and no talking about me flying my friends over to play a game of pickup roundball.

The rich don't give a damn how much it cost to fill the limo.

The poor don't exist to them except as an abstract, to get out the check book for.

The middle class are a threat.

Nothing ever changes since the dawn of time.

131 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:33:17pm

re: #118 MikeySDCA

At the rate we are preparing for the future it seems we will all be cutting back somewhat.

BBL

132 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:33:23pm

re: #115 angst

According to the DOE, 1.6% of our electricity comes from oil. Scroll down for graph.

Like I said, we need to figure out how to replace gasoline with electricity for this to help much.

Use the additional power from nukes (and big solar panel farms) to convert coal into synthetic fuels.

One thing I've noticed in reading The Strategy Page over the last couple of years is that our Air Force has been testing synthetic jet fuel on combat aircraft. (Think they may be planning something?)

133 rawmuse  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:33:45pm

I grew up not too far from this power plant.

134 newsjunkie_ky  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:33:49pm

re: #121 solomonpanting
Just after, IIRC. Like the same week.

135 freetoken  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:34:21pm

re: #115 angst

However, as Boone Pickens likes to point out (see his testimony to the Senate two days ago, found via CSPAN), a great deal of natural gas goes into electricity.

Natural gas can be used to power vehicles (and yes, Pickens has a company that does just that....)

Moving electricity generation away from natural gas would free up that natural gas for transportation uses.

Personally I prefer sticking with liquid fuel + hybrid cars as a transitionary step, rather than go to natural gas as a transition phase, simply due to logistics.

Anyway, the point of McCain's proposal is that energy will be needed, more energy to make up for any loss of imported oil. One way of doing that is through nukes.

136 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:34:39pm

re: #124 Ojoe


Aw, shucks. all the good idears been tooken already!

137 Seraphym  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:34:59pm

re: #115 angst

...we need to figure out how to replace gasoline with electricity for this to help much.

My Vote

Now, about that MSRP....

138 yesandno  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:35:02pm

The phone calls to Congress are having an impact. Keep dialing.

We have got to make our Representatives know that this election year they work FOR us....or they are out of a job.

139 MandyManners  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:35:07pm

re: #125 DesertSage

I liked her in Barbarella.

I didn't know about that.

140 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:35:16pm

re: #126 rwmofo

Alternative Energy Source:

1) Convert a treadmill into a power generator.
2) Put Michael Moore on the treadmill and dangle a pizza in front of him.

Unfortunately, the energy needed to power a treadmill for Moore would require more than the output produced.

141 Wookieelips  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:35:21pm

If communism's so awesome, why do so many people die get murdered under it?

142 DesertSage  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:35:48pm

re: #123 realwest

Huh. I posted that story in the spinoff links on I think the prior thread earlier this evening and didn't see any mention of Jane Fonda nor did I see any mention of Hanoi Jane in the aricle Charles linked to.

The Jane Fonda reference is just some levity by Charles, because of her anti-nuke stance she's taken in the past. Remember The China Syndrome?

143 pingjockey  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:36:35pm

Anything that gives Jane Fonda nightmares, fits, apoplexy, shingles , hives, or foaming at the mouth I am for it.

144 docremulac  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:36:47pm

McCain just got my vote.

145 newsjunkie_ky  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:37:03pm

re: #125 DesertSage

I liked her in 'Cat Ballou'.

146 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:37:31pm

re: #131 Ojoe

We will all most likely be cutting back very much indeed on everything. Welcome to 1932.

147 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:37:43pm

re: #125 DesertSage

I liked her in Barbarella.

Barbarella was the only Jane Fonda movie I ever paid money to see in a theater (Uptown, Minneapolis). It predated the trip to Hanoi so I thought it would be okay, ethically speaking. It was double-billed with The Man Who Fell To Earth so the I didn't completely waste my money.

148 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:37:52pm

re: #121 solomonpanting

And as I recall, didn't that movie come out just before Three Mile Island?

Just before.

Three Mile Island never created a major radiation release, btw.

149 yesandno  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:38:17pm
re: #125 DesertSage

I liked her in Barbarella


Not for the acting...for the outfit, no doubt.

150 MandyManners  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:38:50pm

re: #143 pingjockey

Anything that gives Jane Fonda nightmares, fits, apoplexy, shingles , hives, or foaming at the mouth I am for it.

She is a has-been.

GEORGE SOROS.

151 rawmuse  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:39:01pm

re: #141 Wookieelips

If communism's so awesome, why do so many people die get murdered under it?

For ideological reasons, of course.

152 Neo Con since 9-11  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:39:01pm

re: #55 Shug

I love all these promises guys make about getting things done over 25 years. Over 50 years.

'we're gonna save 2 trillion over 10 years", (with 9.9 trillion saved in the 10th year )

I call Bullshit.

Bingo, unless McCain is planning on overturning the Constitution and serving 6 terms as PoTUS until he's 94 years old this promise is meaningless.

153 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:39:30pm

re: #108 MandyManners

Really?

DONALD SUTHERLAND, "Commander-In-Chief" star, said in an interview with the BBC that President Bush "will destroy our lives!'' The 70-year-old actor choked back tears as he ripped apart the Bush administration for the Iraq war and the slow response to Hurricane Katrina. "They were inept . . . they were insulting . . . They do not care about Iraqi people. They do not care about the families of dead soldiers. They only care about profit.''

154 mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:39:38pm

re: #118 MikeySDCA

"Cut back on energy use" is easy to say, but nobody seems to have an ideas about how to do that which would inconvenience themselves. Myself included.

1) Make all the thousands of municipalities across the country time the stoplights to keep traffic flowing, increasing all our vehicles' fuel economy. That would be easy to do.

2) Get rid of the idiotic "drive through" bank, restaurant, etc. Park your car and walk your fat ass inside and wait instead.

3) Require all road construction projects to devise sensible traffic flow plans. This could be relatively easy to do, but right now, the people who do road construction projects obviously don't give a flying f* about the massive traffic problems they cause.

4) $4.00 per gallon will also nudge people to reduce consumption. We are already seeing that. People who used to commute every day in pickups and SUV's are buying cars that get much better mileage.

155 pegcity  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:40:01pm

Why is america the only country in the world not allowed nuclear power?

Why is america not allowed any new refineries? Or offshore drilling.

156 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:40:39pm

re: #148 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Just before.

Three Mile Island never created a major radiation release, btw.

Yep. But the media frenzy projected doom and gloom, as it is wont to do.

157 pingjockey  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:40:47pm

re: #150 MandyManners
Same type of idiot lefty. Jane can still get TV time though, so I still stand by giving her fits, along with Alec Baldwin, Mr. & Mrs. Susan Saranwrap, Babs, etc....

158 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:41:04pm

re: #150 MandyManners

She is an old hag.

She got her chops in barbarella becus she floated around nekkide in the opening title (tit-le?) sequence. other than that her acting was wooden and all she had going for her was her daddy's name and her bod.
Gravity has taken care of that.

159 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:41:05pm

re: #145 newsjunkie_ky

Yes, indeed! Brilliant! The greatest movie ever made!

160 freetoken  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:41:08pm

Here is the CSPAN video from the Senate committee regarding electricity transmission, from June 17:

rtsp[Link: video1.c-span.org...]

Pick up Boone Picken's comments around the :17, :46, :55, 1:00, 1:13, 1:15, and 1:18 marks in the video (there are other panel memebers speaking at other times.)

Again, kudos to McCain for seeing that we need to increase our electricity generation through non-fossil fuel means.

161 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:41:11pm

re: #115 angst

According to the DOE, 1.6% of our electricity comes from oil. Scroll down for graph.

Like I said, we need to figure out how to replace gasoline with electricity for this to help much.

Do you not understand how non-oil energy that we could produce would affect transportation?

Most of our trans power comes from oil. See here.

Now, imagine if the fuel cell car already in production, the electric cars and buses used by many people and local municipalities, had a cheap, locally produced source of electricity to recharge?

You were certainly correct (and I overstated) about how much electricity is produced from oil, but if we have cheap, locally produced energy of ANY kind (and nuclear is something we can do with NO international help), it will have a ripple effect across the whole spectrum of energy usage.

162 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:41:19pm

re: #153 HelloDare

DONALD SUTHERLAND, "Commander-In-Chief" star, said in an interview with the BBC that President Bush "will destroy our lives!'' The 70-year-old actor choked back tears as he ripped apart the Bush administration for the Iraq war and the slow response to Hurricane Katrina. "They were inept . . . they were insulting . . . They do not care about Iraqi people. They do not care about the families of dead soldiers. They only care about profit.''

Addendum.

163 cutestguy[deleted]  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:41:23pm
164 stevieray  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:41:41pm

re: #135 freetoken

Don't forget heating oil. Its common in the Northeast to heat your home with #2 heating oil -- essentially diesel fuel. If we could move those homes to cheap natural gas it should free up quite a bit of oil for transportation.

165 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:42:02pm

re: #155 pegcity

Why is america the only country in the world not allowed nuclear power?

Why is america not allowed any new refineries? Or offshore drilling.

Dino-saurs.

166 docremulac  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:42:02pm

re: #141 Wookieelips

"If communism's so awesome, why do so many people die get murdered under it?"

The official party line among western commies, academics, members of the media etc is: "That wasn't real communism that the Chinese, Russians and North Koreans etc had. Only us clever commies in the west know how to do real communism. When we get OUR chance at a communist revolution it really will be heaven on earth."

It's basically racism at work. Western communists basically say the Russians and Chinese were too stupid to do communism right.

167 newsjunkie_ky  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:42:07pm

re: #148 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Just before.

Three Mile Island never created a major radiation release, btw.


According to this 'the china syndrome' came out 12 days before Three Mile Island incident.

168 mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:42:39pm

re: #126 rwmofo

Alternative Energy Source:

1) Convert a treadmill into a power generator.
2) Put Michael Moore on the treadmill and dangle a pizza in front of him.

I say that prisons should be filled with exercise bikes hooked up to small electric generators. F* that weight lifting and milling around the prison yard. Son, you owe me a KW-hour if you want to eat!

169 secsailor  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:42:47pm

re: #100 sojerofgod

I've always advocated nuking the gay whales.

One of my favorite bumper stickers! I believe the full text is "Nuke unborn gay whales for Christ". My all time favorite was one a friend had in college. His brother went to the Colorado School of Mines. It was a silhouette of a bulldozer flattening mountains with the phrase "Strip mining prevents forrest fires".

170 freetoken  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:42:53pm

re: #160 freetoken

Let's try that link again, this time in quotes, to see if Charles software won't eat it:

"rtsp[Link: video1.c-span.org...]

171 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:43:07pm

re: #150 MandyManners

She is a dead issue, and would truly be so if out-of-date right-wingers did not froth at the mouth every time she is mentioned.

172 newsjunkie_ky  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:43:16pm

re: #155 pegcity

Why is america the only country in the world not allowed nuclear power?

Why is america not allowed any new refineries? Or offshore drilling.


Because we have the democrat party.

173 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:43:23pm

re: #164 stevieray

Don't forget heating oil. Its common in the Northeast to heat your home with #2 heating oil -- essentially diesel fuel. If we could move those homes to cheap natural gas it should free up quite a bit of oil for transportation.

Or five times cheaper nuclear power.

174 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:43:31pm

re: #137 Seraphym

My Vote

Now, about that MSRP....

Oh, sweet. I so want a Tesla!

175 Yankee Division Son  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:43:49pm

Build 'em. Build them safe, but build 'em. We need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Period. Build 'em, Drill 'em, Wind farm (despite Mr. Kennedy's protest) Solar.. Just do it.

176 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:07pm

re: #169 secsailor

I always liked the one that said, "Forrest fires prevent bears"

177 ploome hineni[deleted]  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:08pm
178 alteredbeat  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:08pm

Nuclear power is something I can get excited about.

179 abolitionist  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:26pm

re: #121 solomonpanting

And as I recall, didn't that movie come out just before Three Mile Island?

Yes it did, 2 or 3 weeks before, iirc.

180 ploome hineni[deleted]  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:28pm
181 freetoken  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:35pm

re: #170 freetoken

sigh... the LGF software doesn't like rstp links.

Anyway, go to cspan.com, look up "Senate Energy & Natural Resources Cmte. Hearing on Transmission of Renewable Electricity" on June 17, 2008.

182 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:46pm

Oh!

Someone thinks he's funny:

With today's looming energy crisis and slow migration to alternative fuel sources, we may not have seen the last of the atomic automobile concept. A safe atomic vehicle may not be entirely beyond our reach, as the US Navy has demonstrated with its perfect record of nuclear safety. Perhaps one day fossil fuels will wither under the radioactive glare of the mighty atom, and our highways will hum with the steam turbines of mobile Chernobyls. It could be a real blast.

183 pingjockey  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:49pm

re: #171 MikeySDCA
I can froth at the mouth about who I please. Jane doesn't make me froth, I just want to chuck a brick at the TV. :)

184 newsjunkie_ky  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:44:55pm

re: #159 MikeySDCA

Well Lee Marvin was brilliant. I also liked Michael Callan and Dwayne Hickman.

185 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:45:08pm

re: #178 alteredbeat

Same here. We need more energy, ferchrissakes, however we can get it. Preferably within our own country...

186 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:45:21pm

re: #154 mich-again

Your #1: Getting any municipality to do anything is very difficult. The notion of getting uniformity is ludicrous.

187 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:45:38pm

re: #174 angst

Hope it rides better than a vette!

First time i rode in one i was shocked at how lousy the damn thing rode. worse than riding in a go kart.

188 ploome hineni[deleted]  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:45:40pm
189 Dave the.....  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:45:48pm

One area I differ from most right wing fanatics is that I love mass transit. I would love to see high density commuter and Amtrak routes powered by electricity, produced by nuclear power.

190 pegcity  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:45:51pm

re: #163 cutestguy

If Canada run by liberals allowed all that stuff i cannot for the life of me understand how big bad america is so weak when it comes to your own well being.

The Alberta oil boom would not have been allowed under the dems watch.

191 newsjunkie_ky  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:46:07pm

re: #164 stevieray

Used heating oil for furnace in FL. Luckily only had to fill up once a year.

192 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:46:32pm

re: #176 sojerofgod

I always liked the one that said, "Forrest fires prevent bears"

I have a non-irrational fear of polar bears. Those critters really will eat us at the first chance.

Drill in ANWR.

193 experiencedtraveller  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:46:35pm

re: #175 Yankee Division Son

Build 'em. Build them safe, but build 'em. We need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Period. Build 'em, Drill 'em, Wind farm (despite Mr. Kennedy's protest) Solar.. Just do it.


WE CANT! TOO MANY LAWYERS.

194 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:47:07pm

re: #166 docremulac

It's the People's Democratic Soviet Socialist Republic of Denial.

195 MandyManners  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:47:10pm

re: #153 HelloDare

DONALD SUTHERLAND, "Commander-In-Chief" star, said in an interview with the BBC that President Bush "will destroy our lives!'' The 70-year-old actor choked back tears as he ripped apart the Bush administration for the Iraq war and the slow response to Hurricane Katrina. "They were inept . . . they were insulting . . . They do not care about Iraqi people. They do not care about the families of dead soldiers. They only care about profit.''

Well, fuck you, Donald Sutherland.

196 sojerofgod  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:47:36pm

re: #192 really grumpy big dog Johnson

They make killer carpets...

197 pegcity  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:47:48pm

re: #195 MandyManners

Is it just me or is he a horrible actor?

198 Noam Sayin'  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:47:59pm

Jane Fonda uses the "C" word.

Just couldn't put it in the spinoffs.

NSFW - that 'c' word.

Honestly, I was looking around for vid of her doing the tomahawk chop at a Braves/Twins '91 Series game.

199 Elydo  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:48:02pm

re: #169 secsailor

One of my favorite bumper stickers! I believe the full text is "Nuke unborn gay whales for Christ". My all time favorite was one a friend had in college. His brother went to the Colorado School of Mines. It was a silhouette of a bulldozer flattening mountains with the phrase "Strip mining prevents forrest fires".

Irradiate the Jesus Fish!

200 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:48:09pm

re: #171 MikeySDCA

She is a dead issue, and would truly be so if out-of-date right-wingers did not froth at the mouth every time she is mentioned.

But riffing on Jane Fonda is fun.

201 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:48:13pm

re: #142 DesertSage
Ah yeah, now I get it - I hate her guts anyway. Talk about your rich, spoiled elite - when she was married to Ted Turner they were THE MOONBAT couple - tons of money and tons of empty space between their ears!

202 Dave the.....  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:48:18pm

Here's an argument to use against the pagans who hate nuclear power.............I used to live in a county that had a large number of coal trains...trains carrying coal to coal fired power plants. Those trains killed about 2 or 3 people a year in that area. Trespassers, snowmobilers, cars on grade crossings, trespassers trying to hitch a ride.

Has anyone ever been killed by nuclear power?

203 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:48:57pm

re: #161 psyop

Do you not understand how non-oil energy that we could produce would affect transportation?

Most of our trans power comes from oil. See here.

Now, imagine if the fuel cell car already in production, the electric cars and buses used by many people and local municipalities, had a cheap, locally produced source of electricity to recharge?

You were certainly correct (and I overstated) about how much electricity is produced from oil, but if we have cheap, locally produced energy of ANY kind (and nuclear is something we can do with NO international help), it will have a ripple effect across the whole spectrum of energy usage.

Exactly, "imagine if." I said we needed to develop fuel cells and hybrids in order to exploit the benefits of cheaper, more plentiful electricity. McCain needs to emphasize that as much as he needs to emphasize nuclear power or all that new electricity isn't going to help much.

Notice how I didn't say "do you not know how to read what I wrote?"

204 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:49:04pm

re: #183 pingjockey

Have you considered getting a life? In this century?

205 pegcity  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:49:09pm

re: #202 Dave the.....

Nuclear power No, nuclear meltdown once.

206 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:49:19pm

Drill everywhere there is oil in our land....EVERYWHERE

Encourage industry to develop alternative energy sources

Start building refineries

build nuclear plants

start using other oil sources, such as oil shale and other oil rich resources. Expensive now, but cheaper as the technology catches up

STOP using corn as a fuel, that is an amazing waste of a resource

Use our coal and natural gas reserves to the max

OR>

We can adopt Obama's plan and tax the crap out of Big Oil.....

which plan sounds more SANE?

207 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:49:31pm

re: #185 psyop

Same here. We need more energy, ferchrissakes, however we can get it. Preferably within our own country...

Hint: We have the largest natural nuclear reserves on the planet.

If OPEC can export oil, we can export the power generated by electricity.

It's not about oil per se, it's about energy. We should capitalize on that in every way we can.

208 freetoken  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:49:44pm

One more thing before I am really gone...

McCain has been trying to bring energy policies to the fore, and has overall, IMO, been doing a good job at trying to balance the various political realities. He is also taking some brave steps too:

McCain wants to end ethanol subsidies and tariffs:

SAO PAULO, Brazil -- U.S. presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain supports ending subsidies for U.S. ethanol production and would back Brazil's inclusion on an expanded United Nations Security Council, a Brazilian newspaper reported Sunday. [...]

However, I doubt McCain will get the recognition on this that he deserves.

209 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:49:48pm

re: #195 MandyManners

Well, fuck you, Donald Sutherland.

what she said

210 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:50:15pm

re: #145 newsjunkie_ky
Hi there newsjunkie! I frankly liked the horse better!
And of course Lee Marvin really made that film.
But I'm prejudiced against her cause of her bullshit during Vietnam - making radio tape recordings Charlie would play calling on us grunts to off our officers and shit.

212 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:50:19pm

re: #202 Dave the.....

Here's an argument to use against the pagans who hate nuclear power.............I used to live in a county that had a large number of coal trains...trains carrying coal to coal fired power plants. Those trains killed about 2 or 3 people a year in that area. Trespassers, snowmobilers, cars on grade crossings, trespassers trying to hitch a ride.

Has anyone ever been killed by nuclear power?

Outside of the Soviet Union?

213 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:50:41pm

re: #187 sojerofgod

Hope it rides better than a vette!

First time i rode in one i was shocked at how lousy the damn thing rode. worse than riding in a go kart.

You rode in a Tesla? I am sad to hear it doesn't have much of a ride. I mean, that's the point of a sports car. Although, maybe not the point of this particular sports car.

214 Purple Prose  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:51:06pm

The Eurabian French derive most of their energy from nuclear power and, as a testament to their love of North African Arabs, sell the waste to their former colonies like Algeria.

Either we will see some interesting evolutionary experiments coming out of the Sahara, if the anti-nuke people are correct, or we will see nothing. I bet we'll see nothing. Contain and bury the crap, and it's fine.

215 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:51:10pm

Perhaps if Bush would just start a war for oil.......

216 Yankee Division Son  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:51:34pm

re: #193 experiencedtraveller

WE CANT! TOO MANY LAWYERS.

Indeed, yet another issue that must be resolved.

217 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:51:37pm

re: #206 Desert Dog

Drill everywhere there is oil in our land....EVERYWHERE

Encourage industry to develop alternative energy sources

Start building refineries

build nuclear plants

start using other oil sources, such as oil shale and other oil rich resources. Expensive now, but cheaper as the technology catches up

STOP using corn as a fuel, that is an amazing waste of a resource

Use our coal and natural gas reserves to the max

OR>

We can adopt Obama's plan and tax the crap out of Big Oil.....

which plan sounds more SANE?

Okay, now there's a comprehensive plan I can get behind.

218 rawmuse  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:51:39pm

I want my own Mr. Fusion.

219 eastvillageinfidel  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:51:45pm

re: #197 pegcity

And as ugly as home-made sin?

220 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:52:09pm

re: #215 Shug

Perhaps if Bush would just start a war for oil.......


I agree, let's invade Saudi Arabia and Venezuela!

221 MikeySDCA  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:52:12pm

re: #202 Dave the.....

Have you heard of Chernobyl?

222 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:52:14pm

re: #211 Ojoe

Mmm, dusky.

223 newsjunkie_ky  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:52:41pm

re: #210 realwest
Agree, this film was made in '65 and I do think it is pretty funny. Yes the horse was awesome and stole every scene.

224 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:53:06pm

re: #189 Dave the.....

Mass transit is only truly effective in HIGH density areas. Los Angeles, New York, Buenos Aires, Tokyo, Hong Kong, London....

Most places that want mass transit do not have the pop density to make it worth it.

One major problem is planning. If you have so few people in an area (take my area, Seattle) that you are trying to plan your mass transit for where you THINK people will be eventually, you will fail. Mass transit only works when the infrastructure is already built up, and people already have established patterns...

225 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:53:29pm

re: #212 The Other Les

Madam Curie, in effect

Marie Curie

226 Noam Sayin'  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:53:48pm

re: #137 Seraphym

My Vote

Now, about that MSRP....

Cool looking car, but it may as well only go 120 miles on a charge. Unless you can travel a full day - 6-8 hours, it's nothing more than an energy-efficient commuter car.

Just sayin'

227 rawmuse  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:53:51pm

re: #221 MikeySDCA

Chernobyl was a typical Soviet F*ck up. They designed a shitty product, then mismanaged it after it was done.

228 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:53:56pm

re: #219 eastvillageinfidel

And as ugly as home-made sin?

And dumb as a doorknob. He had the choice between taking a flat fee or a percentage of the profits from Animal House and he took the flat fee.

Missed out on two million dollars.

229 formercorpsman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:54:12pm

OT, and my apology if anyone has already posted this.

Drudge has on his site, a link to Fox about Democrats calling for nationalization of oil.

[Link: www.foxnews.com...]

230 SasquatchOnSteroids  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:54:12pm

Repeating the lie...


Barack Obama and the Ku Klux Klan: Bernd Debusmann

The rumor that prompted Obama to set up the site last week involved his wife Michelle. Right-wing bloggers spoke of the existence of a videotape that showed her making an angry speech featuring the word "whitey," a derogatory term for white people. "No such tape exists," says the anti-rumor site, "Michelle has not used that word."

231 Mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:54:14pm

re: #215 Shug

Perhaps if Bush would just start a war for oil.......

Bush wouldn't have had to start a "war for oil" if the Dems would just let us drill our own known reserves.

232 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:54:39pm

If the US Navy would be in charge of running the nuclear reactors..with thier safeguards..I would feel comfortable with a 1000 powerplants coming on-line.
The Navy's standards are far above the NRC's standards.
a close second would be the French..( i hear your snickers.. but it's true)

233 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:54:47pm

re: #231 Mich-again

sarc

234 gibsonz  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:54:57pm

Nuclear power...this is the last of the first generation to come on line...[Link: www.nrc.gov...]

235 MandyManners  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:55:08pm

[Link: www.imdb.com...]

236 Dustyvet  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:55:13pm

re: #143 pingjockey

Anything that gives Jane Fonda nightmares, fits, apoplexy, shingles , hives, or foaming at the mouth I am for it.

And should you need to know why, here's Hanoi Jane at work!


[Link: www.26thmarines.org...]

237 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:55:29pm

re: #232 HoosierHoops

If the US Navy would be in charge of running the nuclear reactors..with thier safeguards..I would feel comfortable with a 1000 powerplants coming on-line.
The Navy's standards are far above the NRC's standards.
a close second would be the French..( i hear your snickers.. but it's true)

And, if we opt for the later the employee cafeteria would ROCK too!

238 secsailor  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:55:44pm

re: #202 Dave the.....

Has anyone ever been killed by nuclear power?

Yes. Chernobyl. "203 people were hospitalized immediately, of whom 31 died (28 of them died from acute radiation exposure)."

239 Yankee Division Son  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:55:55pm

re: #215 Shug

Perhaps if Bush would just start a war for oil.......

Wait.. you mean we didn't just fill up the supertankers and skeedadle after we invaded Iraq?

/Lefties lied, SUVs died.

240 Noam Sayin'  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:55:56pm

re: #221 MikeySDCA

Have you heard of Chernobyl?

Shoddy, communist work ethic.

241 Mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:55:57pm

re: #227 rawmuse

Chernobyl was a typical Soviet F*ck up. They designed a shitty product, then mismanaged it after it was done.

And worse yet, they left it all up to the lackeys on the night shift. OK. OK, I have worked the night shift at factories before. I know all the jokes.

242 DesertSage  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:56:41pm

re: #211 Ojoe

Here's the view of the dusk on the San Gabriel Mountains for tonight.

Ahhhh....
Ojoe, that's the best part of the evening...when you post the towercam.

243 Opilio  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:56:58pm

re: #123 realwest

For cryin' out loud FRANCE produces over 70% of it's electrical power with nuke reactors, why can't we AT LEAST match the French and sooner than in 22 years?

For what it's worth, the U.S. produces about 50% more electricity, today, from nuclear power than does France (790 TWh vs. 540 TWh). Not that we couldn't be doing more, but we are outproducing France.

244 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:01pm

re: #240 Noam Sayin'

Shoddy, communist work ethic.

The guys that went in there and fought the fires and put an end to it are SUPER STUDS in my mind though......

245 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:01pm

re: #171 MikeySDCA Well this is ONE out of date right winger who will never forgive nor forget her traitorous actions towards the United States and especially towards my fellow Vietnam Veterans.
Fuck her, but not with my dick.

246 lostlakehiker  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:13pm

re: #71 angst

Well, this is all very good and well, but it isn't going to put gas in my tank or in the tank of the semi-trucks and airplanes, since we don't burn oil for electricity. There has to be a comparable push by industry to develop electric or hybrid engines that are a hell of a lot better than now. Although, maybe it could reduce the cost of electricity enough to make hydrogen fuel cells more attractive.

If he wants to make this a truly helpful plan, he needs to introduce a companion package of incentives to spur research, too.

We don't have a problem securing electricity. We have a problem getting oil.

We do not now have a fleet of plug-in electric cars. We cannot have that fleet unless there's enough extra kwh to recharge them nightly. An assured supply of kwh is essential. Given that supply, the R&D will fall into place.

Then this fleet will be built and used. It'll be no good for long range travel, but millions of people have a car they use for around-town driving. An auto that gets 30 mpg with $10/gal gasoline costs 30+ cents a mile just for fuel. The cost of the electricity would be mere pennies. That will reduce demand for gasoline, and lower demand will make it easier for those who cannot substitute electricity to buy the gasoline.

There are many more uses for electricity. Homes now heated with oil can be kept warm with heat pumps driven by electricity. There have to be endless other possibilities for substitution. Electric trains instead of diesel...

247 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:15pm

re: #224 psyop

Mass transit is only truly effective in HIGH density areas. Los Angeles, New York, Buenos Aires, Tokyo, Hong Kong, London....

Most places that want mass transit do not have the pop density to make it worth it.

One major problem is planning. If you have so few people in an area (take my area, Seattle) that you are trying to plan your mass transit for where you THINK people will be eventually, you will fail. Mass transit only works when the infrastructure is already built up, and people already have established patterns...

This is why I lose my patience with the holier-than-thou Europeans when it comes to their mass-transit snobbery. They had compact cities built up when folks travelled by horse (at best), in itty bitty little countries.

Try living in a huge country mostly settled after the steam engine and internal combustion engine hit the scene.

Energy snobs.

248 SasquatchOnSteroids  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:23pm

re: #230 SasquatchOnSteroids

Right-wing bloggers spoke of the existence of a videotape

Nice

249 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:26pm

re: #243 Opilio

For what it's worth, the U.S. produces about 50% more electricity, today, from nuclear power than does France (790 TWh vs. 540 TWh). Not that we couldn't be doing more, but we are outproducing France.

Size matters

250 Yankee Division Son  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:29pm

re: #238 secsailor

Yes. Chernobyl. "203 people were hospitalized immediately, of whom 31 died (28 of them died from acute radiation exposure)."

Chernobyl was built of Soviet design, there was no containment building.

251 Mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:40pm

re: #232 HoosierHoops

I have posed the idea in these thread that if the NIMBY fools won't relent then we should just build floating nukes and park them offshore with the power cables tethered to land.

252 Maine's Michael  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:57:53pm

Not to be outdone, Obama stated a few minutes ago:

"I also believe nuclear power is the right way to go, and I have asked Iranian President Ahmadinejad to share their nuclear technology with us. The Iranian President responded positively, and has told me that he would share with us as soon as he is done sharing with Israel."

"Dialogue instead of confrontation always gets results." he concluded.

253 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:58:38pm

Chernobyl did not have a containment vessel. That was the biggest problem.

254 gibsonz  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:58:53pm

Sorry broken link...Watts bar unit two...[Link: www.nrc.gov...]

255 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:58:55pm

re: #203 angst

Exactly, "imagine if." I said we needed to develop fuel cells and hybrids in order to exploit the benefits of cheaper, more plentiful electricity. McCain needs to emphasize that as much as he needs to emphasize nuclear power or all that new electricity isn't going to help much.

Notice how I didn't say "do you not know how to read what I wrote?"

There is already a fuel cell car in production, and commercials on your local TV for it (by Honda, check it out... also, GM has a fuel cell car, just not cheap enough electricity to make it commercially viable). There is already the technology and infrastructure in place to take advantage of more nuclear energy. It isn't something we need to wait for, it is waiting for us.

And yes, I did notice how you said "do you not know how to read what I wrote?"

Apparently, you didn't take your own advice....

Now, imagine if the fuel cell car already in production, the electric cars and buses used by many people and local municipalities, had a cheap, locally produced source of electricity to recharge?

256 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:58:55pm

re: #252 Maine's Michael

Not to be outdone, Obama stated a few minutes ago:

yes, I believe Nevil Chamberlain achieved some "results" as well......

257 rwmofo  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 8:59:07pm

re: #180 ploome hineni

[Link: www.jpost.com...]

As the hours ticked down Wednesday to the cease-fire, Kassam rockets continued to pound the western Negev, and Hamas seemed determined to get in "last licks." Close to 30 Kassam rockets struck the area...

So, they agree to a cease fire to begin at a certain time, then the "Palestinians" launch 30 rockets right before the deadline.

Nice to have an agreement.

258 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:00:32pm

re: #252 Maine's Michael

Not to be outdone, Obama stated a few minutes ago:

Well. this past weekend he did speak of the value of the nuclear family.
;0

259 Da_Beerfreak  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:00:34pm

re: #68 Shug

Like their pinto I don't want to rear end that car

The flaming Pinto was more made up msm bull shit!
Very happy former owner of a '74 2.3L 4sp Pinto hatchback.

260 pegcity  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:00:40pm

re: #257 rwmofo

come on like you don't go a little nuts before a diet.

261 yesandno  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:00:42pm

While I believe in conservation, we cannot conserve ourselves into one more gallon of gasoline, one more barrel of oil. As it is, the Goracle used even more energy this past year. 100 nuclear plants may not be enough at the rate he is using energy.

We need something today to be done before the cold weather hits...and the old and poor cannot afford the surge in the price of heating oil and natural gas that is going to occur.

We need to do away with ethanol right now and release the corn for food stuffs. With the amount of land under water right now, we need the fields now growing corn for food not energy. And the law that requires a certain amount of corn to go for ethanol remains in effect even though food supply is going down hill.

As Newt states....drill here, drill now, pay less. Only economically secure nations have the time to deal with conservation, cleaning the rivers and streams. There are ways to extract oil and gas without damaging the environment. We need to put the technology we have developed for other parts of the world seeking clean energy to work in this country. We paid for the technology, when do we get the benefit?

262 unclassifiable  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:00:48pm

The problem with electric cars is batteries. They are relatively nasty to manufacture and I don't really think there is much of a plan to do something with the old ones once they are spent. There is battery recycling done over on the border of Mexico with regular car batteries but, again, its no more environmentally friendly than original manufacture.

I often think that total environmental impact is often overlooked in the chaotic rush to be "green".

263 Macker  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:01:20pm

re: #18 Olderthandirt

Jane you Ignorant Slut.

264 Mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:01:47pm

I have seen no finer expose of Chernobyl than the one offered up by kiddofspeed. Hot Russian girl who rode a hopped up Ninja bike into the hot zone and took pictures. A must see website.

265 lookingaround  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:01:58pm

re: #111 MikeySDCA

Don't be an idiot. I'm in San Diego, CA. Look at a map and consider what it would take to get the coal here.

We have a nuke plant at San Onofre, but I'am at the south end of the county, and we have an oil-fired plant as our primary source.

Let's be honest..."We had a nuke plant in San Onofre" There is not one watt coming out of that hull now.

266 rwmofo  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:02:16pm

re: #260 pegcity

come on like you don't go a little nuts before a diet.

No. I go nuts a lot and why bother with a diet?

267 pegcity  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:02:26pm

re: #264 Mich-again

i thought that was debunked as BS

268 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:02:30pm

For all you NIMBYs out there, THIS is in my backyard (relatively speaking) and it does not bother me. You want more, vote for McCain. You want more bio-fuels, more taxation, more government control, vote for the Obamessiah....it's that simple right now.....

269 abolitionist  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:02:41pm

re: #188 ploome hineni

do they slope?

Who or what?

270 Opilio  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:03:15pm

re: #212 The Other Les

Outside of the Soviet Union?

Yes, most recently in Japan.

271 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:03:44pm

re: #247 angst

Amen to that.

The average Euro has no concept of the distances and land space that we have in America.

Same thing with passports. They think they are so well traveled because of all the stamps on their passport. But in the distance it took them to go through 4 countries and get 4 stamps, I just went from WA to CA along I-5.

Imagine if each state required a passport, that would be more akin to Europe's situation.

272 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:04:24pm

If this can cause Jane Fonda nightmares? Keep it coming!

273 K~Bob  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:04:41pm

re: #84 psyop

Yes, we do. We burn ALOT of oil to make electricity...

Relatively speaking, we don't burn much petroleum to make electricity.

You can see from this chart at DOE that petroleum consumption in conversion to electricity is dwarfed by coal, alone. Then comes natural gas, which also dwarfs petroleum, irrespective of coal. Hell, even "Other Renewables" beats petroleum in several instances. My guess is that petroleum is still burned in some places because it's still cheap, compared to the cost of converting to coal or gas. Maybe its all those dwarves.

At any rate, thousands of gleaming nukes won't cut the cost to fill your tank.

Now, I still want those nukes, if for no other reason than it's damned embarrassing to burn coal, or anything else for that matter, just to make electricity in 2008. I want my flying cars, dammit! I want power to be so cheap we all use crappy computers that have to be overclocked to near meltdown, and then run our friggin' air conditioners at 42degress to keep them alive. I want to come inside on a hot day and just stand in front of the 'fridge till I'm cool. So nukes are just peachy.

But they won't stop us from transferring massive amounts of our wealth to people who hate us and want to kill us. So whenever Senator McCain says, "more nukes," I say F--- that noise, let's drill! I'll cool off in the car!

If we DRILL, continue making engines more efficient, and make use of NON-FOOD-based methane production and other fuel sources, we can expect the bottom to fall out of the petroleum market. It's a bubble.

{ Assume the usual emoticons. I'm harmless. ]

274 Macker  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:04:43pm

re: #245 realwest

Well this is ONE out of date right winger who will never forgive nor forget her traitorous actions towards the United States and especially towards my fellow Vietnam Veterans.
Fuck her, but not with my dick.

Here's Jane's enshrinement into the Moonbat Memorial.

275 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:04:45pm

Our next great challenge in interstate trasportation is low-energy high speed mass transportation, including personal vehicles loaded onto transporters.

This is something that can be done with only minor advances in our technology. There's no reason that coast-to-coast transportation for as little as 100 current dollars could not be achieved. A nationwide web of high speed low-cost transportation is a realizable goal.

Don't laugh at me for saying that.

/

276 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:05:01pm

COT:

"But I was touched by it," Michelle Obama said. "And that's what I like about Laura Bush. You know, just calm, rational approach to these issues. And you know, I'm taking some cues. I mean, there's a balance. There's a reason why people like her. It's because she doesn't, sort of, you know, fuel the fire."

I guess a, you know, degree from, like, you know, an Ivy League School, really, you know, affords a real boost to speaking, you know.

277 womball  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:05:22pm

Ooh a reason to vote for him!

278 pegcity  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:05:41pm

re: #271 psyop

You americans have no idea about distances, the distances between Quebec and Manitoba 2 provinces away is 2700 km.

279 lostlakehiker  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:06:24pm

re: #202 Dave the.....

Here's an argument to use against the pagans who hate nuclear power.............I used to live in a county that had a large number of coal trains...trains carrying coal to coal fired power plants. Those trains killed about 2 or 3 people a year in that area. Trespassers, snowmobilers, cars on grade crossings, trespassers trying to hitch a ride.

Has anyone ever been killed by nuclear power?

Yes. At Chernobyl. A few plant workers, and the heroic* Red Army sappers who shut it down even though working in the hot zone was certain death.

The fallout from the accident didn't exactly kill anybody outright, but quite a few more people died, in the area that took the heaviest fallout, than would have been expected if not for the accident.

We don't have the same bad design used at Chernobyl. The Three Mile island accident was our worst. There was a measurable release of radiation, but no one was killed or even injured. No statistical footprint of surplus deaths in the affected zone has been observed.

There are actually more radiation deaths associated with coal mining than there are with nuclear. The air in mines often has elevated levels of radon. Miners get more cancers associated with radiation exposure than ordinary. Coal is dangerous, quite apart from its contribution to global warming. Nuclear power has dangers, but the public imagination is unreasonably fearful of them. It's like sharkbite. Mosquitoes kill millions of people yearly, by injecting lethal diseases. Sharks kill a handful. But we don't see any horror movies with the title PROBOSCIS!

* no sarcasm intended.

280 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:06:43pm

re: #275 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Our next great challenge in interstate trasportation is low-energy high speed mass transportation, including personal vehicles loaded onto transporters.

This is something that can be done with only minor advances in our technology. There's no reason that coast-to-coast transportation for as little as 100 current dollars could not be achieved. A nationwide web of high speed low-cost transportation is a realizable goal.

Don't laugh at me for saying that.

/

Beam me to Washington, Scotty

281 Mich-again  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:06:55pm

re: #253 HelloDare

Chernobyl did not have a containment vessel. That was the biggest problem.

really? in 264 I posted a story about Chernobyl and I pulled this from that site..

At 1:23 AM, the operator moved to shut down the reactor in its low power mode and a domino effect of previous errors caused an sharp power surge, triggering a tremendous steam explosion which blew the 1000 ton cap on the nuclear containment vessel to smithereens.
282 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:07:59pm

re: #281 Mich-again

The containment vessil was Eastern europe

283 2by2  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:08:22pm

Iranians share their nuclear technology by sending a ballistic missile to Obamerica

284 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:10:27pm

re: #276 solomonpanting

COT:


I guess a, you know, degree from, like, you know, an Ivy League School, really, you know, affords a real boost to speaking, you know.

Mich wants to eat her waffle, too.

Her humble upbringing included babysitting for Jesse Jackson as a teenager. Why do I NOT THINK that she did this for three bucks an hour?

285 MacGregor  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:11:21pm

Is nuclear waste an issue any more? Is storage a concern?

286 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:12:20pm
“If I am elected president, I will set this nation on a course to building 45 new reactors by the year 2030, with the ultimate goal of 100 new plants to power the homes and factories and cities of America,” he said.

Well, this is one issue that I must disagree with Sen. McCain about. He wants 45 reactors on-line by the year 2030, with the idea that there will be 55 more on-line at some indefinable point beyond that?

Well, I want 45 reactors on-line yesterday, with the promise that there will be 55 more on-line tomorrow!

/unrealistic I know, but a guy can dream can't he?

287 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:12:33pm

Russian nuclear powered icebreaker Yamal.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

288 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:12:40pm

re: #281 Mich-again

I heard that sometime ago on some TV program about the whole affair. And before I posted, I googled it. Found verification in, I'm afraid to say, Wiki. But I'm pretty sure I'm right.

289 Da_Beerfreak  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:12:52pm

re: #71 angst

Well, this is all very good and well, but it isn't going to put gas in my tank or in the tank of the semi-trucks and airplanes, since we don't burn oil for electricity. There has to be a comparable push by industry to develop electric or hybrid engines that are a hell of a lot better than now. Although, maybe it could reduce the cost of electricity enough to make hydrogen fuel cells more attractive.

If he wants to make this a truly helpful plan, he needs to introduce a companion package of incentives to spur research, too.

We don't have a problem securing electricity. We have a problem getting oil.

A big problem we have is everybody wants to look at transportation as if it was the only area where oil use can be reduced.
Right now oil is our best portable fuel, and transportation is the area where we currently are making the best use of it. Once we have an abundant supply of clean electricity the first thing we should do with it is to get people who are using fuel oil for home heating to change over to electricity. That alone will free up a bunch of oil that can be used elsewhere. Next would be doing the same with the folks that use natural gas for heating. And so on down the list, I would leave transportation for last.

290 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:13:36pm

re: #286 Slumbering Behemoth

I think we may need a NIMBY control act of 2009.

291 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:14:36pm

I'd be willing to bet that the first time all the necessary governmental buffoons authorized off- shore drilling, before any oil company could get a drill out to sea, OPEC would drop the price of oil in half.
And if we do seriously pursue (that means more, faster) nuke energy, solar energy, technology for more long distance, better performing and easier and cheaper rechargeable electric cars, they'll drop the price of oil to a point where they think we won't want alternative fuels.
I say go for ALL the viable alternative energy sources and do it NOW and in a BIG way.Oh, and problems getting insurance for nuke reactors (a MAJOR problem for owner/operators and would be owner/operators) - let the government - that is US - insure them. I'd sooner see my tax dollars going to US energy independence than general funds or the Highway Trust Fund anyway.

292 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:14:59pm

re: #278 pegcity

You americans have no idea about distances, the distances between Quebec and Manitoba 2 provinces away is 2700 km.

Sure we do. That's about 1600 statute miles.

293 unclassifiable  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:15:02pm

Drilling

New refineries

Nukes

Hydrogen

Mass Transit

These are 5 - 20 year solutions.

Over the next presidential term no matter what these two guys say, we are just going to have to lump it.

It's not that we should not do these things but they are not going to result in any near-term solutions that are so near and dear to the political heart.

What we can do is think about some of patterns of behavior (I avoid the word conservation because it has a few luddite qualities attached to it).

#1 I fly all over the country so that my clients can see me. Is that necessary? Not really. I can do everything from home. But that requires a few behavioral changes and assurance. For me it means that I am not billing the client while I am mowing the yard or watching the game. For the client, they have to give up the warm fuzzy of being able to amble on over anytime for a nice chat. The trade off -- use of electricity vs. use of jet fuel.

294 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:15:14pm

What bothers me the most is the only substitute for oil is OIL, with the amount of product we get from petro-chemicals, there is nothing else that can replace it, fortunately, it does not need to be replaced, there is plenty oil, here there and everywhere. Just remember, it was only a few months ago that oil was flowing and SUV's were happy and healthy. If the price did not skyrocket due to reasons nobody can pinpoint, we would not be having this discussion. We are the United States, there is no reason WE
should have to conserve just to survive, I'm not saying we should waste it, but this is just silly. We are the ones that sacrifice for, and protect the world, the least we could do is live comfortably. Think about it. There is enough oil for us to live the way we did WAY back in 2006, get the price down to $50-$60 dollars /barrel and all will be fine.

295 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:15:56pm

re: #278 pegcity

You americans have no idea about distances, the distances between Quebec and Manitoba 2 provinces away is 2700 km.

Well, yeah.... but thats... thats...

CANADA!

No offense meant, I love you guys up there. Seriously.

296 Opilio  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:16:00pm

re: #265 lookingaround

Let's be honest..."We had a nuke plant in San Onofre" There is not one watt coming out of that hull now.

Not true.

San Onofre Unit 1 closed in 1992. San Onofre Unit 2 and Unit 3 produce about 1200 MW each, providing about 20% of the electricity needs of So Cal.

Opiliofact™

297 gibsonz  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:16:18pm

The next generation of nuclear power in the US starts here,it is a TVA site with all pre-approved environmental impact permits,all licensing intact and a congressional mandate dating back to the eighties...at a cost of 20 plus billion dollars of taxpayers money mothballed in hidden TVA writeoffs...unit #1 and #2 were 60 plus percient complete when abandoned...

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

298 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:16:22pm
299 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:17:38pm

By the way, I am now and always have been pro-nuke (power and weapons)

300 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:18:22pm

re: #285 MacGregor

These issues come right from the laws of physics and you cannot sidestep them.

Nuke plants accumulate a messy soup of radioactive "daughter products" as they run; these daughter products, the split parts of the former uranium or plutonium atoms, eventually slow down (poison) the chain reactions in the rods, and the rods have to be withdrawn and either stored indefinitely in human terms, or reprocessed.

Reprocessing involves dissolving the rods in acid; so at one stage of the process you have a highly radioactive and acidic liquid.

some of the radioactive daughter products remain dangerously and even lethally radioactive for many thousands of years. These must not be allowed into the biosphere, where they would accumulate up the food chain, some of them, and damage whatever organism they are in.

It is a nightmare.

301 K~Bob  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:18:33pm

re: #273 K~Bob

Crap, when I started that post, there were only 60 or so posts. Then I got sidetracked. Sorry for the duncy, and the redun'cy.

{ Assume, etc. }

302 calcajun  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:18:45pm

Why, how else we we have a "Mr. Fusion" reactor on our old De Loreans?

Seriously, how does the silly bint think that the very efficient fuel cell vehicles will get the cheap, plentiful hydrogen needed to power the damn things, as well as run our Blu-ray players to watch the Criterion Collection editions of "Barbarella" and "Klute"?

The French--for whom I do not have a great affinity--have had a spotless nuclear power record for more than half a century have something to teach us in this regard.

303 Maximu§  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:19:36pm

Right On McCain!

304 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:19:43pm

re: #302 calcajun

Why, how else we we have a "Mr. Fusion" reactor on our old De Loreans?

Seriously, how does the silly bint think that the very efficient fuel cell vehicles will get the cheap, plentiful hydrogen needed to power the damn things, as well as run our Blu-ray players to watch the Criterion Collection editions of "Barbarella" and "Klute"?

The French--for whom I do not have a great affinity--have had a spotless nuclear power record for more than half a century have something to teach us in this regard.


and now the French are generating heat by Burning cars

305 rwmofo  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:20:02pm

Two observations:

This is one of the dumbest headlines I've EVER seen...

...and THIS WOMAN NEVER SMILES!

306 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:20:18pm

re: #273 K~Bob

I already did a mea culpa on that and showed this graph...

Energy consumption.

I altered my argument to talk about how energy locally produced would affect even the tranpo energy used (by being able to recharge electric vehicles, produce cheap hydrogen, etc...).

307 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:20:44pm

re: #305 rwmofo

Two observations:

This is one of the dumbest headlines I've EVER seen...

...and THIS WOMAN NEVER SMILES!


You know, I never notice her face

308 The Other Les  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:21:06pm

re: #305 rwmofo

Two observations:

This is one of the dumbest headlines I've EVER seen...

...and THIS WOMAN NEVER SMILES!

All that plastic on and in her.

309 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:21:14pm

re: #305 rwmofo

Two observations:

This is one of the dumbest headlines I've EVER seen...

...and THIS WOMAN NEVER SMILES!

when you get a BOTOX injection every morning, you cannot physically generate a smile.....

310 Spadez  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:21:15pm

I'm a big fan of nuclear power. I hope McCain gets elected and the new nuke plants are built.

311 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:21:31pm

re: #255 psyop

There is already a fuel cell car in production, and commercials on your local TV for it (by Honda, check it out... also, GM has a fuel cell car, just not cheap enough electricity to make it commercially viable). There is already the technology and infrastructure in place to take advantage of more nuclear energy. It isn't something we need to wait for, it is waiting for us.

And yes, I did notice how you said "do you not know how to read what I wrote?"

Apparently, you didn't take your own advice....

Now, imagine if the fuel cell car already in production, the electric cars and buses used by many people and local municipalities, had a cheap, locally produced source of electricity to recharge?

All of those technologies will have to be better in order to replace gasoline. They are very, very far from doing so now. Right now it takes three years for a Prius hybrid to pay for itself- 98 years for a Lexus hybrid. At $4 gal gas!

My point is that all energy sources are not created equally. They're not interchangeable. There isn't even a plan in the works for a commercial airplane to use electricity. What about freight trains and semi-trucks? Oil, gas, and kerosene have phenomenally concentrated energy that a battery simply cannot match, at least so far. So while we only generate 1.6% of our electricity with oil, and can replace that, what percentage of transportation needs can be replaced by electricity at our current state of technology? Personal autos are the least of our worries.

And my comment about "reading what I wrote," was simply to point out that being rude isn't necessary to have a discussion. In fact, it detracts.

312 sadhu  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:21:54pm

re: #275 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Our next great challenge in interstate trasportation is low-energy high speed mass transportation, including personal vehicles loaded onto transporters.
/

I drive coast to coast 3-4x a year -- I'd do it that way with my car in a heartbeat. Great idea.

313 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:22:27pm

The best location for a nuclear energy source is 93,000,000 miles out, and we already have one there.

314 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:23:08pm

Even if they came out with a new-tech car, how long before it replaced the 250 million cars in this country.

315 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:23:13pm

re: #313 Ojoe

The best location for a nuclear energy source is 93,000,000 miles out, and we already have one there.

The problem is capturing the end results of that nuclear reaction....

316 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:23:37pm

re: #293 unclassifiable

Drilling

New refineries

Nukes

Hydrogen

Mass Transit

These are 5 - 20 year solutions.

Over the next presidential term no matter what these two guys say, we are just going to have to lump it.

It's not that we should not do these things but they are not going to result in any near-term solutions that are so near and dear to the political heart.

What we can do is think about some of patterns of behavior (I avoid the word conservation because it has a few luddite qualities attached to it).

#1 I fly all over the country so that my clients can see me. Is that necessary? Not really. I can do everything from home. But that requires a few behavioral changes and assurance. For me it means that I am not billing the client while I am mowing the yard or watching the game. For the client, they have to give up the warm fuzzy of being able to amble on over anytime for a nice chat. The trade off -- use of electricity vs. use of jet fuel.

Yup. You are right. We are going to have to lump it until technology catches up. But unless you know something I don't, you won't live to see electricity used instead of jet fuel. Find me a battery that can fly a plane and I will know where to invest my retirement funds!

317 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:23:46pm

re: #274 Macker Excellent, but didn't she do some really nasty shit to our P.O.W.'s at the Hanoi Hilton, too? I mean it wasn't just the photo op of her sitting at a communist anti-aircraft gun, it was the recorded audio tapes she made for Uncle Ho to be played to American forces, calling for enlisted men to kill thier own officers and screwing around the POWS.
She was the total traitorous package and should have been put on trial for that behavior - that goes WAAAAY beyond being "Anti-War".

318 eastvillageinfidel  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:24:30pm

re: #305 rwmofo

Yes, she seems awfully grim, and with a husband that looks like that ! (I seem to to be very looks oriented tonight! Must be the tequila!)

319 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:24:31pm

re: #290 The Other Les

I think we may need a NIMBY control act of 2009.

What would you propose?

/sad fact, a marble had to rattle around in my skull for a bit before I could recall the meaning of the acronym NIMBY

320 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:24:43pm
321 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:25:13pm

re: #315 Desert Dog

A promising area to work in.

322 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:26:07pm

re: #320 Ojoe

railroad auto transport rail car, just add windows.

Oooh, that's a pretty train! So.. now that everyone's going to use mass transit, will Amtrak finally stop having to be subsidized?

323 gibsonz  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:26:11pm

No nuke plants will be built unless on pre-existing pre-approved sites,the enviromental impact studies alone will be a minimum of ten years of court battles,followed by years of injuctions and mandates.

324 HoosierHoops  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:26:12pm

re: #237 Desert Dog

And, if we opt for the later the employee cafeteria would ROCK too!

That's great dog! :)
Speaking of french food..You can really get the bomb in Montreal..
Did a thing in '06 there and think it's one of the worlds great cities and love it there..Great food..( hate running it off the next morning )
But that's just my opinion.. I met a hockey player from the famous london knights in ontario this weekend and he forcefully feels that anyone from montreal is a frog...Sort of like how red sox fans think the yankees are the devil incarnate..cracks me up..
Regards,

325 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:26:16pm

re: #317 realwest

Oh, stop making sense, you old out-of-date right-winger.

;-D

326 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:26:17pm

re: #8 snowcrash

Springfield? The Simpsons live there.

There are 32 Springfields in the US.

327 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:26:30pm

re: #317 realwest

Excellent, but didn't she do some really nasty shit to our P.O.W.'s at the Hanoi Hilton, too? I mean it wasn't just the photo op of her sitting at a communist anti-aircraft gun, it was the recorded audio tapes she made for Uncle Ho to be played to American forces, calling for enlisted men to kill thier own officers and screwing around the POWS.
She was the total traitorous package and should have been put on trial for that behavior - that goes WAAAAY beyond being "Anti-War".

I agree, she should have been tried for treason.....it is one thing to be against your country, it is quite another to provide aid and comfort to your enemy.......I hate Hanoi Jane with a burning, searing passion....she is a pile of sh*t and cannot take back what she did...EVER

328 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:26:50pm

re: #316 angst

Yup. You are right. We are going to have to lump it until technology catches up. But unless you know something I don't, you won't live to see electricity used instead of jet fuel. Find me a battery that can fly a plane and I will know where to invest my retirement funds!


Introducing nonstop service from JFK to LAX in just under 8 weeks

329 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:27:41pm

re: #311 angst


And my comment about "reading what I wrote," was simply to point out that being rude isn't necessary to have a discussion. In fact, it detracts.

Point taken, and fairly so. I do get a little worked up sometimes, and I shouldn't have let it out on you.

As to your other points, you are absolutely correct in saying that all energy sources are not created equally. There is lots of work to do, and many different ways to do it.

I thought (and perhaps I misread or misunderstood) that you didn't think that nuclear could be a major part of the energy solution.

I believe it can, and should be a part of our energy policy going forward, and perhaps that led me to read more into your posts than was warrented

330 Purple Prose  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:28:05pm

Obama's energy policy is, like his foreign policy, inspired by Winnie the Pooh. He wanted to send Piglet to Saudi Arabia as special oil envoy, but since a right-wing website pointed out that, unlike Illinois politicians, the Saudis don't go for pork, he has removed this from his platform. So he is sending Tigger instead, whose bouncing will shake more oil out of the ground. In deference to the Gulf States, Piglet will be quietly put to death.

In the meantime, since Obama is such a forward-thinking sort, Roo will be dispatched to Australia to try to convince the Aussies to turn their country into one giant solar panel. Obama is culturally sensitive and knows that the Aussies will take a liking to Roo.

Eeyore is going to play double duty. He is going to go to Moscow to complain about how life sucks and how they have every right to be depressed and not have babies, while trying to convince them that if life sucks and nothing matters, they might was well just give sell their oil to Obama at a barrel for a fifth of vodka. Eeyore is also going to go to Iceland and play a different game. He is going to try to get geothermal out of them after guilt tripping them about being happy when they live in such a northern climate and are, after all, of European extraction and so should be miserable.

Rabbit, of course, will be envoy to the EU. The EU will appreciate such a sensible but always-wrong voice. Rabbit's assignment will be to convince the Europeans that they should further increase their taxes on oil. This is smart, from a schadenfreude standpoint, because even if Obama can't succeed in solving the US's energy problems, at least he can say we've got it better than the Europeans.

And Winnie the Pooh? Well, Obama is planning on stuffing him and giving him to Michelle as a present at his wedding vow renewal ceremony, so Michelle can be proud that her honey made her Pooh Wright.

331 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:28:12pm

re: #285 MacGregor Yes, storage IS a concern - ever since Dirty Harry Reid (D-NV) abused his power as Senate Majority leader to shoot down a bi-partisan panels recommendation to use some God forsaken piece of Nevada for that storage.

332 K~Bob  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:28:50pm

re: #306 psyop

I already did a mea culpa on that and showed this graph...

Energy consumption.

I altered my argument to talk about how energy locally produced would affect even the tranpo energy used (by being able to recharge electric vehicles, produce cheap hydrogen, etc...).

Heh, well, and me, standing in front of an open fridge, and running my A/C at max.

I'm betting we keep using oil for transportation until someone invents a brand-new way to move stuff. Like levitation or anti-gravity paint.

{ Assume stuff. }

333 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:29:40pm

re: #324 HoosierHoops

I don't agree with the French on many things, but you cannot deny they make the tastiest food on earth....and the best wine too......and, their women are not bad either

334 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:29:45pm

Anything that makes Hanoi Jane have heart palpitations is a good thing. She is a class-A bitch (sorry to any female canines that may be reading this tonight!). She deserves nothing but ridicule, scorn, and malevolence towards her. Fuck Jane Fonda. No, wait, no telling what you might catch...

335 Ojoe  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:29:48pm

re: #331 realwest

It is an insane security risk these days to leave the spent fuel rods in local storage, sometimes very near large centers of population.


Goodnight

336 sadhu  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:29:51pm

re: #320 Ojoe

railroad auto transport rail car, just add windows.

Make it super high-speed, coast to coast, add windows. I'm in.

337 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:30:00pm

re: #328 Shug

Introducing nonstop service from JFK to LAX in just under 8 weeks

Oookaayyy.....

I think it'll fly my kid's barbie dolls, though.

338 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:30:17pm

re: #242 DesertSage

Sage?

339 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:31:06pm

re: #330 Purple Prose

so Michelle can be proud that her honey made her Pooh Wright.

That's so bad...!

340 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:31:42pm

I hate the term "environmental impact study"
I'm sure glad they did not have them when we built the Empire State Building or ALL of the amazing things in this country.

341 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:32:08pm

re: #334 6pat6

Anything that makes Hanoi Jane have heart palpitations is a good thing.

/Has there been the least indication that she does, in fact, have a heart?

342 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:32:13pm

re: #340 Tarkus289

Or bridges, roads, harbors...

343 K~Bob  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:32:22pm

re: #326 6pat6

There are 32 Springfields in the US.

The oil wells are in West Springfield.

{ Emoticons. }

344 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:32:25pm

While the French have been using nuclear power for decades, they've also been looking into air-powered cars.

First

Second

345 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:32:31pm

re: #341 NY Nana

Good point.

346 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:32:39pm

re: #293 unclassifiable
Yeah, but see my #291 - the cost of fuel oil will drop like a rock once we announce we have approved off-shore drilling and approved building and bringing on line more nuke reactors.
And that could conceivably happen before this November's elections (but it would be GOOD for American so the Dem's won't go for it!).

347 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:32:42pm

re: #333 Desert Dog

I don't agree with the French on many things, but you cannot deny they make the tastiest food on earth....and the best wine too......and, their women are not bad either

Screw that. Gimme a giant Porterhouse, and shaved legs & pits.

348 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:33:01pm

re: #332 K~Bob

No harm, no foul. We find ourselves in front of these glowy boxes to exchange ideas and debate them, so don't stop now. Especially if you think someone else is wrong. That is the whole point of discussion....

There are already new ways of moving stuff that have been invented, they just aren't cheaper (per pound/mile load) than oil just yet.

But, technology keeps getting better, and oil keeps getting more expensive, eventually the free market and balance will prevail....

349 esch  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:33:02pm

re: #330 Purple Prose

...so Michelle can be proud that her honey made her Pooh Wright.

*wince* Brilliant.

350 lostlakehiker  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:33:20pm

re: #294 Tarkus289

What bothers me the most is the only substitute for oil is OIL, with the amount of product we get from petro-chemicals, there is nothing else that can replace it, fortunately, it does not need to be replaced, there is plenty oil, here there and everywhere. Just remember, it was only a few months ago that oil was flowing and SUV's were happy and healthy. If the price did not skyrocket due to reasons nobody can pinpoint, we would not be having this discussion. We are the United States, there is no reason WE
should have to conserve just to survive, I'm not saying we should waste it, but this is just silly. We are the ones that sacrifice for, and protect the world, the least we could do is live comfortably. Think about it. There is enough oil for us to live the way we did WAY back in 2006, get the price down to $50-$60 dollars /barrel and all will be fine.

There is not enough oil for us Americans, Europeans and Japanese, and now also the people of India and China, to use each at the rate we Americans have become accustomed to. Back when, India and China had undeveloped economies. Their people wanted the benefits of oil, but without a strong economy, they were in no position to win the auction and buy it.

Now, everybody's bidding. A hotly contested auction means a high strike price for the item. The price is going to stay well above $60 per barrel. It'll probably never drop below $100. Even if American demand drops because we switch over to more efficient cars etc., demand in the developing world, that part of it that really is developing, will surge.

The good old days are over. This happens from time to time in history. Lucky us, that our trials and tribulations don't seem to be as harsh as the Great Depression, the Irish Famine, the Mongol Horde, the Nazis, etc. We can manage. We'll come out of it stronger and richer. But for now, we're poorer, and there's no easy fix. Nuclear power, and lots of it, is part of the answer. Sober resolve and purpose are in order.

351 Shug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:33:26pm

re: #346 realwest

Yeah, but see my #291 - the cost of fuel oil will drop like a rock once we announce we have approved off-shore drilling and approved building and bringing on line more nuke reactors.
And that could conceivably happen before this November's elections (but it would be GOOD for American so the Dem's won't go for it!).


Somebody explained this to me the other day and it made perfect sense.

the Trend is your friend

352 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:34:14pm

re: #326 6pat6

There are 32 Springfields in the US.

I have 2 Springfields in my gunsafe...

Oh, Wait... you meant...

Never mind...

353 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:34:19pm

re: #347 Cartman

and, their women are not bad either

Naah, not so much. Been there. Bathing is certainly optional with the French; I guess that is why they produce such great perfume!

354 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:35:25pm

re: #353 6pat6

A loaded Springfield is a friend.

355 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:35:39pm

re: #353 6pat6

Naah, not so much. Been there. Bathing is certainly optional with the French; I guess that is why they produce such great perfume!

Hey, it wasn't me that said they were.

356 6pat6  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:36:26pm

re: #355 Cartman

True, but you were closest!

357 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:36:31pm

re: #345 6pat6

I detest her. And when McCain wins, we can all wave goodby to the bitch. I think Iran might be a suitable place for her.

358 unclassifiable  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:36:32pm

re: #328 Shug
Prediction: I think you are going to miss your connection.

359 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:36:52pm

Magneto levitation in near vacuum tunnel tubes.

Coast to coast in less than four hours nonstop. Less than eight hours with several stops enroute. $100.

It can be done.

360 famousmortimer78  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:37:13pm

Sweet! This is my home town.

361 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:37:15pm

re: #352 psyop

Just put some $ down on the new XD-M.

362 eastvillageinfidel  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:37:38pm

If the French can use nuclear power safely and efficiently I don't see any reason we can't. As long as we have enough gas to keep muscle cars and cool old trucks on the road I don't care what we do.

363 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:38:22pm

re: #350 lostlakehiker

I partly agree with you, but I believe that there is plenty of oil in places we know about and do not know about, but again, this is America, we have done too much for the world for us to fall to third world status, which we will if we keep this attitude, remember, if things get desperate we could annex S.A. or Vnz. and sieze the oil.

364 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:38:40pm

re: #347 Cartman

Gimme a giant Porterhouse, and shaved legs & pits.

On the same plate?!?!?! ;)

365 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:39:04pm

re: #361 Cartman

Love that product line...

My wife has an XD 9MM, great little sidearm.

366 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:39:32pm

re: #350 lostlakehiker

There is plenty of oil in the world. We keep finding more and more. The known oil reserves of world are double what they were in the 1980's when we were told we are running out. The question is, will we allow piss-ant countries like Saudi Arabia, Venezula, Iran and the other usual suspects of OPEC dictate our energy plans? Right now they do. If they continue along this line, do you really think we will sit here and let them push us into a permanent depression? There is a breaking point here and the scumbags running OPEC, the speculators currently making BILLIONS and the complacent oil companies better realize that......

367 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:39:58pm

re: #364 NY Nana

On the same plate?!?!?! ;)

No, I prefer one course at a time, Nana. :)

368 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:40:00pm

re: #366 Desert Dog

Yep.

369 shambug  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:40:16pm

YYAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY! OK OK, I am finally on board with Mc Cain.
Now, if someone would please tell him that ANWAR is frozen TUNDRA! NOT a park, that would be great.
It's TUNDRA.
I don't give a RAT'S about TUNDRA.
Oh, and if he would also drop the global warming crap, that would be even better.
I am already being driven out of California, after 48 years, by the upcoming fees taxes and other environmental stupidity.
We have to sell out within a year. I am hoping there will be somewhere else to go live that has not gone nuts with taxes.
Actually, Mexico is looking pretty good. I lived there as a kid, we had a beach house there, and a hunting camp too.
I have been going back, and they are just trading populations with us, there are now THOUSANDS of Americans living in Baja. I estimate there are at least 20,000 American's living from Tijuana to La Bufadora.
I don't know who told everyone, but the word is out.
No stupid laws, and cheaper REAL gas. Our car companies sell different model's of cars down there too, no environmental garbage on them.
But maybe if we DRILL HERE DRILL NOW! Sign Newt's petition!

370 Desert Dog  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:41:08pm

re: #356 6pat6

True, but you were closest!

I am guessing you have not been there and "sampled" the local offerings

371 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:41:23pm

re: #323 gibsonz I agree with you, but the fact is that the EPA is an orgainization under the direction of the President; if Congress and the President wanted it to be so, then the EPA would reduce that timetable to one year, tops.

372 pat  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:42:07pm

Not only should we have safe design mega-reactors in earthquake and flood safe areas, but we should have Rickover type mini-reactors through out the country. from Nome to Tuscon. Requiring more safety personnel than operational technicians they are perfect for mid-sized small cities.

373 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:42:25pm

re: #365 psyop

Love that product line...

My wife has an XD 9MM, great little sidearm.

Me too. I have a SA 1911 Trophy Match and the compact XD-9 as well. The match-grade barrel and the .40 S&W platform on the "M" were just too much for me to resist.

374 K~Bob  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:43:14pm

re: #348 psyop

eventually the free market and balance will prevail....

Amen, to that.

{ Where are my dang emoticons? }

375 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:43:28pm

re: #359 really grumpy big dog Johnson


Like this?

376 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:44:16pm

re: #333 Desert Dog
Sorry, I dibs the Italians for food, Americans for women and wine.

377 gibsonz  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:44:49pm

Without a Presidential executive order bypassing a democratic congress,the next generation of nuclear power is nothing more than a debate on a blog, followed by one lawsuit after another after another...the second generation of nuclear power can and will be a reality if only our elected officials put the Nation first and politics second...don`t hold your breath unless their sorry asses` are in jeoperdy of being voted out!

378 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:45:01pm

re: #367 Cartman

No, I prefer one course at a time, Nana. :)

Phew! I thought so! Pommes frit with that?

379 angst  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:45:13pm

re: #329 psyop

Point taken, and fairly so. I do get a little worked up sometimes, and I shouldn't have let it out on you.

As to your other points, you are absolutely correct in saying that all energy sources are not created equally. There is lots of work to do, and many different ways to do it.

I thought (and perhaps I misread or misunderstood) that you didn't think that nuclear could be a major part of the energy solution.

I believe it can, and should be a part of our energy policy going forward, and perhaps that led me to read more into your posts than was warrented

Well, I just emphasized the shortcomings of nuclear energy, you emphasized its benefits. The whole picture does need both.

Now I'm going to bed. A great discussion, Lizards, as usual.

380 Dustyvet  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:45:17pm

re: #326 6pat6

There are 32 Springfields in the US.

33 if you count Buffalo Springfield...:)

381 pat  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:46:06pm

re: #376 realwest

Ditto. Altho Stokholm was picked for prettiest women. LA came in 3rd. But my nieces live in LA and they are gorgeous, but then there is Hawaii.......

382 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:46:19pm

....and another thing, I am really getting tired of hearing in almost every commercial about conserving and saving and green green green, it is all left wing nonsense, once again, We are the United States, we drive trucks and like race cars, we should not have to change the greatest country in the world because of something that is being artificially held back. The air is cleaner than it was when I was young, the environment is fine, I'll bet even the highway Indian (Italian) would agree.

383 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:46:47pm

re: #380 Dustyvet

33 if you count Buffalo Springfield...:)

Dusty Springfield?

384 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:46:48pm

re: #378 NY Nana

Phew! I thought so! Pommes frit with that?

Well, maybe just a little reduction sauce. ;)

♥ Nana ♥

385 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:47:04pm

re: #335 Ojoe You're correct, but the bi-partisan panel reached it's conclussions only after a lot of study and testimony by true experts in the field and the location in Nevada was NOT near any kind of large population center.
BTW, where does the US Navy "store" it's spent rods?
Have a goodnight my friend.

386 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:47:08pm

re: #344 solomonpanting

While the French have been using nuclear power for decades, they've also been looking into air-powered cars.

First

Second

This is a joke, right? Or some pretty lame reporting. Is that Michi Kaku at the beginning? He could not have signed off on the video.

387 psyop  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:47:18pm

re: #373 Cartman

Me too. I have a SA 1911 Trophy Match and the compact XD-9 as well. The match-grade barrel and the .40 S&W platform on the "M" were just too much for me to resist.

I have my wonderful Kimber that is just great. I have had my eye on the XD line again, however....

388 pat  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:47:57pm

re: #382 Tarkus289

It is not about energy. It is about a deep hatred of America and Americans that do not have navel studs.

389 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:48:24pm
390 Tarkus289  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:48:47pm

re: #388 pat

I know, that is why we should not take it.

391 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:49:06pm

re: #375 NY Nana

Like this?

Not quite so extreme. The primary cost of distance mass transit is friction and payload. The more you reduce friction the less payload matters. If you have near vacuum, you can funnel the remaining molecules into a glide cushion that allows you to have levitation/acceleration stations widely apart, with little loss of efficiency.

This isn't Jetson's, it's attainable science. We hadn't put a man in space when we vowed to put a man on the moon. We beat the target date easily.

392 Cartman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:49:18pm

re: #387 psyop

The Eclipse is sweet. I have an Ulta Raptor II. Kimber makes a great 1911.

393 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:51:22pm

re: #386 HelloDare

This is a joke, right? Or some pretty lame reporting. Is that Michi Kaku at the beginning? He could not have signed off on the video.

I haven't yet seen anywhere that it's a hoax.
They wouldn't pass domestic crash tests, though.

394 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:54:53pm

re: #350 lostlakehiker
I have only one "quibble" as to what you said. We do know why the cost of oil has gone up - OPEC and the weak dollar. Yeah, I know, according to the idiot Dems in Congress (pardon my redundancy there) it's the oil companies making "obscence" profits, but it's still OPEC and a weak dollar.
And I do have confidence in Science - some day, some way, somebody will invent "oil" that can be made in a factory in enormous quantities at a relatively cheap price.

395 Da_Beerfreak  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:54:58pm

Unfortunately this is nothing more then talk during an election year. Nothing is going to change until the shit hits the fan big time.

396 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:55:15pm

re: #384 Cartman

Well, maybe just a little reduction sauce. ;)

Fussy, fussy, fussy! ;)

♥ Cartman ♥

397 susanl  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:56:19pm

re: #171 MikeySDCA


Sounds like you aren't old enough to personally remember. I knew men who were in Vietnam with that worthless c**t did her thing. No, we don't over-react, the scab on the wound that is Vietnam will always be paper thin. The name Jane Fonda is one that can pick it wide open.

398 toonman  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:56:22pm

Maybe he brought up the nuclear reactors to distract the hippies from complaining about Iraq. All they have to do is get their "No Nukes" signs out of storage and they are ready to go!

399 Dustyvet  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:56:54pm

re: #383 solomonpanting

Dusty Springfield?

Nah Buffalo, an old friend I servrd in Vietnam with...:)

400 abolitionist  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:57:14pm

re: #366 Desert Dog

There is plenty of oil in the world. We keep finding more and more. The known oil reserves of world are double what they were in the 1980's when we were told we are running out. [snip]

Assuming a gaussian model for approximating year-by-year world oil production (and consumption), a doubling of the (estimated) total amount (call it Q) that will ultimately be produced (ie, doubling the area under the curve) will shift the peak (50 percentile point of the gaussian distributution) into the future only by about 20 years.

I'm confident of that statement. I've done the math.

401 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:57:25pm

re: #391 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Brilliant post. It makes sense. And I wonder what it would take to wake people up.

402 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:58:26pm

re: #372 pat Excellent post and thought and I agree completely!
Thanks for that!

403 Dustyvet  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:58:33pm

re: #398 toonman

Maybe he brought up the nuclear reactors to distract the hippies from complaining about Iraq. All they have to do is get their "No Nukes" signs out of storage and they are ready to go!

Same folks who don't have a problem with Iran having nukes...go figure.

404 HelloDare  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:58:52pm

re: #393 solomonpanting

I haven't yet seen anywhere that it's a hoax.
They wouldn't pass domestic crash tests, though.

The car is real, the reporting bogus. It's very efficient but not a perpetual motion machine as the report stated. Your new link describes it better:

The cost of a fill up is approximately $2.00. If a driver doesn't have access to a compressor station, they will be able to plug into the electrical grid and use the car's built-in compressor to refill the tank in about 4 hours.

The compressed air technology is basically just a way of storing electrical energy without the need for costly, heavy, and occasionally toxic batteries. So, in a sense, this is an electric car. It just doesn't have an electric motor.

405 abolitionist  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 9:58:54pm

PIMF: distributution distribution
/ skipped the spellcheck, tho

406 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:01:29pm

re: #404 HelloDare

It's very efficient but not a perpetual motion machine as the report stated

Yeah, I heard that and rolled my eyes.

407 kansas  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:02:28pm

re: #155 pegcity

Why is america the only country in the world not allowed nuclear power?

Why is america not allowed any new refineries? Or offshore drilling.

Democrats

408 solomonpanting  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:06:18pm

re: #399 Dustyvet

Nah Buffalo, an old friend I servrd in Vietnam with...:)

Buffalo Springfield... arguably the most talented American band for what the members produced after they went their own ways.

409 realwest  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:10:23pm

re: #377 gibsonz See my #371. And btw, the President can't issue an Executive Order that would by-pass Congress on the approval processes. That shit is enshrined in duly passed legislation, signed by a president, in many different varities - The Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the like, NOT to mention all the different state acts that come into play; only if the Congress and the President pass legislation which would override the existing Federal Law and the existing State laws, would it be possible to get this mass of inertia moving. And that might - hell would - result in court cases testing the constitutionality of that new legislation. But IF we could EVER get the majority of Dem's to do what's right by and for America, we could get the off-shore drilling going - thus as I said upthread, causing OPEC to suddenly reduce what they charge for oil and Solar Energy, should we ever really perfect it would need no authorization at all - not even an environmental impact statement.

410 calcajun  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:21:45pm

re: #304 Shug

Next, burning people--we found a witch!

411 calcajun  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:22:45pm

re: #380 Dustyvet

But only one Montgomery Burns!

412 NY Nana  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:36:25pm

G'nite, all. I am off to sleep, as we have errands to do before going to Brooklyn, to see our toddler grandson this afternoon!

Sweet dreams!

413 pet85022  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 10:56:14pm

Lets hope he has the brains to follow the French and build them all identical. I know it's a bit galling to follow the French BUT they are on to something, you have one design not 45 a HUGE cost savings in design and materials, if a problem comes up in one you can then check out the other 44 and avert the same problem. Reprocess and reuse the fuel until it's useless like the French, cuts down markedly on the waste foot print. CLOSE DOWN YUCCA MT., the only place worse to store nuclear waste is on top of the San Andreas fault. The old copper mines in Ajo Az look promising.

414 pat  Wed, Jun 18, 2008 11:37:26pm

re: #413 pet85022

Lets hope he has the brains to follow the French and build them all identical. I know it's a bit galling to follow the French BUT they are on to something, you have one design not 45 a HUGE cost savings in design and materials, if a problem comes up in one you can then check out the other 44 and avert the same problem. Reprocess and reuse the fuel until it's useless like the French, cuts down markedly on the waste foot print. CLOSE DOWN YUCCA MT., the only place worse to store nuclear waste is on top of the San Andreas fault. The old copper mines in Ajo Az look promising.

There are 2 uniform designs that meet the current regulatory scheme in the USA, GE and Westinghouse. Both are the most advanced and safest.

415 Optimizer  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 12:17:02am

re: #138 yesandno

The phone calls to Congress are having an impact. Keep dialing.

We have got to make our Representatives know that this election year they work FOR us....or they are out of a job.

I WISH! My Senators are Clinton and Schumer; my Representative is retiring (quite probably to be replaced by his usual rival, who is a Communist). I figure all I can do is plead with any of you guys who might have Federal Congresspersons who are NOT hopeless to PLEASE dial your little fingers to the bone!

416 Ojoe  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 12:24:19am

re: #391 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Not only a vacuum, but if you go downhill from the stops, then back up toward the next stop, you get gravity assist on acceleration, and free gravity energy storage on braking.

417 fooburger  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 12:31:32am

re: #44 Ojoe

Spent nuclear fuel may be dangerous in terms of a dirty bomb, but it's not something that will generally get used in a nuclear bomb.
Do produce plutonium for use in a nuclear bomb, you have to run a reactor for a precise amount of time. If you run it too long, isotopes that will ruin the fuel's use as a bomb will become too prevalent.
This is why we're not concerned about shipping power-grade nuclear fuel to places like Saudi Arabia. In order to process that into a plutonium bomb, their reactors would operate on an obviously suspicious cycle.
Processing generator grade uranium into bomb-grade uranium would require facilities that they would need for no other possible purpose, assuming their fuel is given to them in at enrichment level conducive to power.

418 Optimizer  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 12:31:52am

re: #155 pegcity

Why is america the only country in the world not allowed nuclear power?

Why is america not allowed any new refineries? Or offshore drilling.

As to the first statement, it's funny considering we're the country that INVENTED it, isn't it?

As to the second, imagine the Saudis saying, "we won't drill for the trillions of dollars of oil under our country because we don't want to ruin the pristine natural state of the desert ecosystem". I like to consider us more advanced, culturally, than those people, but on this issue they make us look like totally backward, superstitious, Earth-worshipping retards in comparison.

The Moonbats love to opine about the all-powerful Big Oil, but if Big Oil is so omnipotent, how come they haven't been able to drill in these place, after decades of begging to do so?

419 GregInSeattle  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 12:32:05am

Let's be serious. You can't fission your way out of the energy crisis.

/Channeling the Dems

420 Ojoe  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 12:34:44am
421 Optimizer  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 12:49:04am

re: #192 really grumpy big dog Johnson

I have a non-irrational fear of polar bears. Those critters really will eat us at the first chance.

Drill in ANWR.

I like polar bears as much as the next guy, but when I think about the eco-fascists using them to cost the economy a trillion dollars (to pick a number that's probably on the right order of magnitude), and then I divide by the number of bears (about 25000), I get $40M per bear. Then I get the urge to find somebody who will hunt them ALL down...

And I don't even believe - for ONE MINUTE - that they're threatened!

422 dmjboose  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 1:00:39am

Woo hoo! +1 for McCain! that puts him at -20! that's way above obama!

423 Optimizer  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 1:07:44am

re: #208 freetoken

One more thing before I am really gone...

McCain has been trying to bring energy policies to the fore, and has overall, IMO, been doing a good job at trying to balance the various political realities. He is also taking some brave steps too:

McCain wants to end ethanol subsidies and tariffs:


However, I doubt McCain will get the recognition on this that he deserves.

I'm encouraged - but not overly impressed - with McCain in this stuff. His new policy on offshore drilling is really NOT to drill, but rather to leave it to the states to decide to NOT drill instead of having the the Feds mandate not drilling. (If that sounds a little convoluted, well politicians count on that, don't they?) This nuclear initiative is a step in the right direction, but is pretty limited.

But, hey - his ethanol stance is at least new, and refreshingly sane!

Perversely, one source of encouragement is to be had in the fact that nobody who really believed in AGW could suggest allowing more fossil fuel being dug up. But, then, I assume a certain level of rationality...

424 gbl  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 3:55:29am

From Bechtel publication: [Link: www.bechtel.com...]

"Energy analysts believe it is just a matter of time before a new U.S. plant begins humming. Bechtel expects to see three to five certified designs for nuclear plants within five years. The U.S. Department of Energy believes 50 new reactors could be operational by 2030."

Seems McCain's proposal pretty much matches DOE's thoughts.

425 mollyshark  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 4:32:45am

Wow..something that is actually driving me to post!

Just Do It.

There. Back to my coffee.

426 MadJadBad  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 4:52:23am

3 sitting senators were campaigning.
All making promises what they will do if elected.
All could have proposed legislation years ago.
What is wrong here?

427 Cap'n DOC  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 4:52:51am

I know this thread is dead by now, but I have to throw in an insult about that worthless bag of skin, and she shall remain nameless. She can take up residence in the Hanoi Hilton for all I care...

428 Sunlight  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:08:33am

Do you guys know a website with a good (accurate and understandable to ordinary people) of how nuclear power plants work... the old version with rods that cause heartburn for storage, etc. and the new pebble version that the French use that reduces the dose and length of storage necessary afterward? Maybe I'll do something on my new blog if there isn't one. I've heard that the pebble version of waste wouldn't require Yucca Mtn, thus the Nevada politicians couldn't keep the whole thing hostage. I've also heard that they might be able to get the waste down to a level where it could be sent to the salt caves in New Mexico that are now used for low level waste (as an example). We need to get geared up on LGF for knowing this stuff so we can counter BS politics with technology info.

429 snopercod  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:18:36am

re: #55 Shug

I love all these promises guys make...I call Bullshit.

Me too. As one who used to actually build nuclear power plants (Diablo Canyon and Palo Verde), I can tell you: There isn't enough money, stainless steel, rebar...and especially trained people in the United States to build five by 2030, let alone forty-five. Hell, they'll be lucky to have the permits by 2030.

430 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:21:39am
431 6pat6  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:22:07am

re: #370 Desert Dog

I am guessing you have not been there and "sampled" the local offerings

I've been there several times. Just wasn't terribly impressed.

432 caboose  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:23:41am

Interesting bit of trivia. According to a book on the XB-70, the engines in just one of those beasts were capable of providing enough power to satisfy the electrical needs of the entire country of Ireland...

...in 1960. (Which was around the time that this book was written.) :-)

433 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:25:21am
434 Sunlight  Thu, Jun 19, 2008 5:35:06am

re: #433 taxfreekiller

One more time,

Harry Reid has been getting huge amounts of re-election money to
stall the Yucca Mountain Nuke Storage Site, he will keep getting the