LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

'Intelligent Design' Teacher Fired

Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:23:12 pm PDT

In Ohio, the Mount Vernon school board has voted to fire a science teacher who preached “intelligent design” to his class.

That’s not quite the whole story, though; he also used a high frequency generator to burn a cross into a student’s arm.

The Mount Vernon School Board passed a resolution to terminate the employment of John Freshwater, an eighth-grade science teacher for the past 21 years.

Freshwater, according to an independent report, used an electrostatic device to mark a cross on the arm of one of his students, causing pain to the student the night of the incident and leaving a mark that lasted for approximately three weeks.

According to the Ohio Department of Education, the student’s family has filed a lawsuit.

Freshwater was also reprimanded several times for refusing to move his Bible from his classroom desk and teaching creationism alongside evolution, according to the 15-page independent report. The report also cites evidence that Mr. Freshwater told his students that “science is wrong because the Bible states that homosexuality is a sin and so anyone who is gay chooses to be gay and is therefore a sinner.”

Advertisement

791 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 AK oilfield worker  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:25:03pm

I saw that on FOX the other day, what a whacko!

2 rlevitin  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:25:10pm

This guy sounds like a nutball.

That device sounds friggin scary.

He should be fired regardless of his views for abusing a student like that.

3 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:26:18pm

I'm glad he was fired. He used his position to bully and abuse kids. Any teacher that does this should be shown the door and never allowed to teach again.

4 BGOH  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:26:48pm

I just heard on the radio here in Ohio this afternoon that he has not been fired, but should be next month, just for clarification.

I'll see if I can dig up a link.

5 MJ  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:27:22pm

He probably should have been fired a long time ago since they've had complaints about this preacher...oops, teacher for several years.

6 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:28:06pm

This Freshwater story is a bit murky. We should dive deeper and attempt to get to the bottom of it

7 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:28:13pm

When Creationists go wild!

8 BGOH  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:28:55pm

Here it is:

[Link: www.wtam.com...]

The school board has voted on an "intent to terminate" decision, and he will still get a hearing before them.

9 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:29:40pm

re: #7 Killgore Trout

You would think a Christian would know better to harm even a hair on a child. Guess I must have missed the verse in the Bible that said he could abuse another person's child.

10 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:29:42pm

Burn a cross into a student?
Assault!
Jail time is in order.

I might be Christian, but this twit would be praying the cops got him before I did if this were my kid.

11 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:29:42pm

Right -- he isn't quite fired yet. I don't think anyone doubts he will be, though.

12 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:29:43pm
science is wrong because the Bible states that homosexuality is a sin and so anyone who is gay chooses to be gay and is therefore a sinner.”


I've read this several times and each time I read it , it makes less and less sense to me.

This man needs a psychiatric evaluation. Seriously

13 pegcity  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:29:50pm

He physically abused his students isn't that a crime?

14 pegcity  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:30:51pm

re: #12 Shug

I've read this several times and each time I read it , it makes less and less sense to me.

This man needs a psychiatric evaluation. Seriously

ah the old people choose to be gay argument, i don't know if he knows many gay people but i worked with tons and i seriously doubt anyone is not born gay.

15 DistantThunder  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:32:13pm

Wacky. As a Christian, I'm embarrassed. Sounds like he has a relgious obsession which is in the DVM-IV for the first time:

The proposal to include religious problems was made by Dr Francis Lu, associate clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California Medical School, San Francisco, who approached the manual's task force in December 1991. He believed that people with religious or spiritual conflicts were being misdiagnosed as suffering from psychoses with religious content. The task force approved the proposal in January last year. Last May the board of trustees and the assembly of the American Psychiatric Association gave their approval to the new section.

A patient could be classified as having an isolated religious or spiritual problem; a religious problem with an unrelated mental disorder; or a religious problem with a related mental disorder. These categories fit in with others such as marital problems and educational problems, which are seen as problems of living as opposed to mental disorder.

16 theparson  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:32:25pm

re: #9 Sharmuta

You would think a self-professed Christian would know better to harm even a hair on a child. Guess I must have missed the verse in the Bible that said he could abuse another person's child.

Just because he says he is a Christian doesn't make him one.
I can stand in my garage but it doesn't make me a car.

17 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:32:31pm

re: #11 Charles

He'll probably get moved into an "administrative" position.

Translation: Given a big raise and hidden out of sight.

18 Pastorius  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:32:32pm

He's a Christian Jihadi.

Except, of course, there is no Biblical basis for this, neither are there any Christian academic institutions, media outlets, political groups, or governments, of any appreciable size which would support his behavior (in burning crosses into the arms of children).

19 BGOH  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:33:26pm

re: #11 Charles

Right -- he isn't quite fired yet. I don't think anyone doubts he will be, though.

Agreed. I was just pointing it out because I literally heard it an hour or so ago.

I wish they didn't have to wait a month to make this official. Is this some sort of union reg?

20 Paul  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:33:26pm

Good riddance to a genuine whack job. But I can't help but think, if only school boards were as prompt in firing other abusive and incompetent teachers that infest public education.

21 NonNativeTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:33:40pm

Oh man, and I thought the FM station was going to
keep rolling the Obama hits all day long and nothing but Obama.

22 Racer X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:33:43pm

Saw it on Fox - the student with the cross burned onto his arm is going to sue the school.

23 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:33:51pm

I wonder if he'd be able to get a job at the discovery institute.

24 Bogeyfre  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:34:06pm

See ya, get these clowns out of our schools. Maybe we can go back to teaching the three R's

Reading
wRiting
aRithmetic

I can hope can't I...

25 Phocid  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:34:08pm

Reminds me of my 8th grade science teacher back in 1952. He was kindly old gent named Oliver Love, a good science teacher until he got started on the subject of evolution then he'd get very serious, hold up the bible in one hand and the science text in the other and say, "If you believe this one you can't believe that one." We students just considered him a dotty old man with some strange ideas. He never abused the students or burned crosses into their bodies. I never had a teacher that was that crazy. We never had female teachers who wanted to have sex with their male students and nobody ever brought a gun to school.

26 nikis-knight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:34:14pm

Kook...

27 DistantThunder  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:34:27pm

re: #23 Sharmuta

I wonder if he'd be able to get a job at the discovery institute.

Sharm, you hater you.

28 DistantThunder  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:35:03pm

re: #24 Bogeyfre

See ya, get these clowns out of our schools. Maybe we can go back to teaching the three R's

Reading
wRiting
aRithmetic

I can hope can't I...

Sex ed is important so people know what to do....jeeeez, do I have to do all the thinking here?

29 Beobachter  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:35:28pm

OT: I just posted a question for Charles thread in the, but when I hit the post button, there was a new thread. Even thought this is OT, I hope you will allow me tho repeat the question here:

re: #34 Beobachter

Charles, while you are improving the web site, may I make a suggestion? I asked about this before and then per all your alls help, discovered the 'new comments' button. Would it be possible for you to hook up the same kind of link refresh to the refresh button in the related links section. Oftentimes, I find myself poking through the related links and hitting the refresh button quite frequently to see if there are new links. While doing this, I have missed new threads frequently.

30 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:35:36pm

re: #20 Paul

Good riddance to a genuine whack job. But I can't help but think, if only school boards were as prompt in firing other abusive and incompetent teachers that infest public education.

Actually- they weren't very prompt. The administration had been getting complaints on him for 11 years, but I guess it took out right child abuse to get him fired.

31 Salem  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:35:42pm

He's demonstrated no respect for the rational divide, so he has no business being a public educator, even less a science teacher. He has taught his students one lesson he hadn't counted on, though.

32 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:35:55pm

re: #23 Sharmuta

Maybe he'll be featured in Ben Stein's next movie.

33 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:36:08pm

re: #27 DistantThunder

Sharm, you hater you.

Yeah- next thing you know, I'll quote the koran or some such madness.

34 Ojoe  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:36:39pm

This is retro madness

Religion should be harmless

Voluntary
Self-directed
& Harmless

Or it is not worth the effort.

Prison time for Mr. Freshwater seems to be in order.

35 ec marm  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:36:45pm

I had a science teacher that brought a hand cranked DC generator to class one day. We macho 7th grade boys all tried to stay standing while we held electrodes in each hand and he cranked faster and faster.
Good times.
True story.

/ It hurt like hell, you couldn't help but drop to your knees, and it was physically impossible to let go.
He kept his job, but a buncha parents were not happy when their sons came home and bragged about how long they were able to be 'electrocuted' in front of the class. Not one girl volunteered. I didn't last too long before I dropped and I had to wipe my eyes when it was over.

36 nikis-knight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:37:13pm

re: #18 Pastorius

He's a Christian Jihadi.

Hardly. He gave a kid a tattoo. It doesn't even say if the kid wanted it or not (which doesn't excuse him if he did, that's not a decision for a kid.)
Fire him, sue him, great, but! Involuntary tattoo =/= missing head.

37 Pastorius  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:37:17pm

#16 The Parson

Just because he says he is a Christian doesn't make him one.
I can stand in my garage but it doesn't make me a car.

I don't buy that arguement. That's the same argument Muslims use. When one of their own does something of which they do not approve, they simply say, "He isn't a Muslim. No Muslim would do such a thing."

Not a good answer.

I think the best answer is, he's a sick Christian.

38 HelloDare  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:37:29pm

Hey, that guy's high frequency generator better not infringe on the my patented instant stigmata machine.

39 DistantThunder  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:37:51pm

re: #35 ec marm

I had a science teacher that brought a hand cranked DC generator to class one day. We macho 7th grade boys all tried to stay standing while we held electrodes in each hand and he cranked faster and faster.
Good times.
True story.

/ It hurt like hell, you couldn't help but drop to your knees, and it was physically impossible to let go.
He kept his job, but a buncha parents were not happy when their sons came home and bragged about how long they were able to be 'electrocuted' in front of the class. Not one girl volunteered. I didn't last too long before I dropped and I had to wipe my eyes when it was over.

girls are smarter.. Gonna hurt? No thanks = brainier.

40 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:37:55pm
Matt. 13...
24 Another parable He set forth before them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field.
25 But while he was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed also darnel (weeds resembling wheat) among the wheat, and went on his way.
26 So when the plants sprouted and formed grain, the darnel (weeds) appeared also.
27 And the servants of the owner came to him and said, Sir, did you not sow good seed in your field? Then how does it have darnel shoots in it?
28 He replied to them, An enemy has done this. The servants said to him, Then do you want us to go and weed them out?


Matt. 7...
23 And then I will say to them openly (publicly), I never knew you; depart from Me, you who act wickedly [disregarding My commands].

These two passage show us there are those who say, act and look like Christians, but are not. Rev. Phelps et. al. others who are in for their own personal gain, Benny Hinn et. al. others who preach false gosples Rev. Wright et. al.

While some may truly think they are doing the Lords work, others knowingly masquerade. All will be judge more harshly in the end.

Or in the words of Obama, these aren't the Christians I know, and will end up under the eternal bus.

41 abolitionist  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:37:56pm
Freshwater, according to an independent report, used an electrostatic device to mark a cross on the arm of one of his students, causing pain to the student the night of the incident and leaving a mark that lasted for approximately three weeks.

Charles, there seems to be som discrepancy in the technical details of the story. The electrostatic characterization seems to be inconsistent with high frequency. Anyone have more info on the device used?

/ had a course in electrostatics

42 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:38:12pm

Semi-OT: Education....
Shut up! Women teachers told their constant talking puts boys off school work

Celia Lashlie, an education adviser and author, said women should 'step back and shut up' in the classroom.

Instead of talking constantly, they should communicate with their pupils using non-verbal cues, such as a raised eyebrow. Female teachers should allow boys to be boys.

Miss Lashlie, who describes herself as a feminist, added that mothers should not try to run their sons' lives.

'I've been in classes with young female teachers and by the end of the session my ears hurt,' she added. 'Women need to step back and shut up.'

43 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:38:53pm

re: #16 theparson

Just because he says he is a Christian doesn't make him one.
I can stand in my garage but it doesn't make me a car.

But if you're walking down the street and turn into a bar...
What does that make you?

44 Ojoe  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:38:57pm

And boy this kind of behavior, you'll never hear the end of it on Pacifica Radio, and to a lesser extent on NPR.

45 DistantThunder  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:39:15pm

re: #42 Killgore Trout

Semi-OT: Education....
Shut up! Women teachers told their constant talking puts boys off school work

I kinda agree that some can be overbearing and controling.

46 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:39:31pm

re: #41 abolitionist

The fox story says "high frequency generator".

47 pegcity  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:39:38pm

re: #35 ec marm

sounds like the time my friends got ahold of my taser and decided it would be fun to test it out on eachother.

48 missouri boy  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:39:41pm

Teacher Unions will fight to keep him from being fired. Paid leave will be pushed.

49 Beobachter  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:40:20pm
50 abolitionist  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:40:35pm

re: #46 Sharmuta

Thanks, Sharm

51 Ojoe  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:40:49pm

re: #42 Killgore Trout

I have often wondered where the gals do find so many words.

I would run out

52 HelloDare  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:40:51pm

re: #16 theparson

Just because he says he is a Christian doesn't make him one.
I can stand in my garage but it doesn't make me a car.

Yeah, but if the car in your garage says it's a Christian...uh, let me work on that a little.

53 theparson  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:40:52pm

re: #46 Sharmuta

The fox story says "high frequency generator".

Has anybody said it yet?
What's the frequency, John?

54 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:40:53pm

re: #35 ec marm

I had a science teacher that brought a hand cranked DC generator to class one day. We macho 7th grade boys all tried to stay standing while we held electrodes in each hand and he cranked faster and faster.
Good times.


My dad brought one home for me to play with. We started booby trapping things around the house (door knobs, railings, etc) and try to shock each other. He took it away after I rigged to toilet and waited for him to pee.

55 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:41:34pm

re: #49 Beobachter

This video at Hot Air is just priceless:

Video: Obama supporter shocked to find YouTubers mindlessly cheering his flip-flop on public financing

He really is in mom's basement!

56 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:42:33pm

re: #45 DistantThunder

I have a built in instinct that I tune out with too much talking. Nagging causes a very visceral reaction with me. I've decided to stay single. It's best for everybody.

57 reine.de.tout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:42:46pm

re: #35 ec marm

I had a science teacher that brought a hand cranked DC generator to class one day. We macho 7th grade boys all tried to stay standing while we held electrodes in each hand and he cranked faster and faster.
Good times.
True story.

/ It hurt like hell, you couldn't help but drop to your knees, and it was physically impossible to let go.
He kept his job, but a buncha parents were not happy when their sons came home and bragged about how long they were able to be 'electrocuted' in front of the class. Not one girl volunteered. I didn't last too long before I dropped and I had to wipe my eyes when it was over.

'

Hmm. Guess the girls had more sense, eh?

58 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:42:51pm

Don't high frequency electrostat me bro

59 Ojoe  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:43:02pm
60 HelloDare  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:43:03pm

re: #49 Beobachter

This video at Hot Air is just priceless:

Video: Obama supporter shocked to find YouTubers mindlessly cheering his flip-flop on public financing

This Obama supporter lives in a basement.

61 Paul  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:43:36pm

re: #30 Sharmuta

Actually- they weren't very prompt. The administration had been getting complaints on him for 11 years, but I guess it took out right child abuse to get him fired.

Unfortunately, you're right. Here in SE Wisconsin the teachers' union is very strong and it protects its members, no matter how ill prepared incompetent or absent they are. It takes something very serious, as a physical/sexual assault, blatant drug abuse* or overt criminality to get fired.

*Recently, a Milwaukee Public School teacher was arrested for growing marijuana in his house and selling it to students.

62 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:44:34pm
63 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:44:49pm

re: #58 Shug

Don't high frequency electrostat me bro

Fine just stand out of the under this giant silver sphere stacked on ceramic insulator.

64 MJ  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:45:32pm

At least he didn't bring poisonous snakes into the classroom so that the kids could try to handle them. That would have been an interesting "science" experiment...

[Link: www.rickross.com...]

65 Racer X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:45:55pm

re: #59 Ojoe

By the way, nice clouds today visible from the towercam

Those are Dihydrogen Monoxide vapors contributing to Global Warming!

66 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:46:06pm

re: #62 LeePro

OT

The hazards of owning a Big Screen TV.

An electrostatic generator will fix that, PDQ.

67 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:46:39pm

re: #65 Racer X

Those are Dihydrogen Monoxide vapors contributing to Global Warming!

Okay, who put the Dihydrogen Monoxide in my water?

68 CyanSnowHawk  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:46:42pm

re: #54 Killgore Trout

My dad brought one home for me to play with. We started booby trapping things around the house (door knobs, railings, etc) and try to shock each other. He took it away after I rigged to toilet and waited for him to pee.

OMG ROTLMAO KT!

A friend made one in school back around '75. Transformer, hand crank with gear, and 9V battery mounted a wood block. We would get as many together as we could and see how many people the jolt would travel through. I think we ran out of people before we couldn't feel it anymore.

69 Racer X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:47:56pm

re: #67 JCM

Okay, who put the Dihydrogen Monoxide in my water?

Up to a billion parts per billion are allowable.

70 nyc redneck  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:48:19pm

he really sounds like a kook. using a device to burn a cross onto an 8th grade student's arm?
what's next, the rattle snakes in a basket?

71 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:48:31pm

re: #68 CyanSnowHawk

OMG ROTLMAO KT!

A friend made one in school back around '75. Transformer, hand crank with gear, and 9V battery mounted a wood block. We would get as many together as we could and see how many people the jolt would travel through. I think we ran out of people before we couldn't feel it anymore.

I had an old army field phone generator, crank on that puppy who put out a nice little zap.

72 Beobachter  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:48:33pm

re: #62 LeePro

OT

The hazards of owning a Big Screen TV.

On Live Leak. too.

73 abolitionist  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:49:08pm

re: #72 Beobachter

On Live Leak. too.

LOL

74 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:49:11pm

re: #69 Racer X

Up to a billion parts per billion are allowable.

Whew, thanks I feel much better know.

75 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:49:44pm

re: #74 JCM

Whew, thanks I feel much better know.

PIMF, now....

76 CyanSnowHawk  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:49:52pm

re: #35 ec marm

I had a science teacher that brought a hand cranked DC generator to class one day. We macho 7th grade boys all tried to stay standing while we held electrodes in each hand and he cranked faster and faster.
Good times.
True story.

/ It hurt like hell, you couldn't help but drop to your knees, and it was physically impossible to let go.
He kept his job, but a buncha parents were not happy when their sons came home and bragged about how long they were able to be 'electrocuted' in front of the class. Not one girl volunteered. I didn't last too long before I dropped and I had to wipe my eyes when it was over.

This is just a hypothesis, mind you, but I think the women save up their pain allocation for meaningful things, like child birth, while the men just waste theirs on things that usually start out with one of them saying, "Hey, check this out."

/

77 mfarmer1  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:50:28pm

True story:

I worked with a guy who was all into the Earth is only 4000-5000 years old nonsense. He used to bring in these hilarious "scientific manuals" which were nothing more than self published printouts from a home color laser printer. He also wore a cross around his neck that would make the Pope jealous. I entertained some of his conversations just because they were so...entertaining. Unfortunately, he took that as an opening to convert me as I'm sure most people can't control their laughter and maintain a poker face like I can.

Well, it just got a bit much so I finally decided to have some fun. I went to a bead store in a hippie beach area and bought some truly evil looking pendants, skulls, feathers, this satanic looking hand thing holding a globe, etc., and assembled my own gaudy necklace.

No joke...when he saw it when I came to work, he really freaked out and started having all sorts of nervous ticks and mannerisms. His neck, head, eyes, shoulders, everything, started twitching and worse. These movements got so bad over the next few days that he even started stomping his foot uncontrollably like one of those circus shows where a horse supposedly shows it can count.

And naturally, I got into all sorts of trouble for causing his mental breakdown and prolonged absence from work. I'm glad he didn't have any electrostatic tattoo devices nearby, that's for sure.

78 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:50:29pm

re: #71 JCM


I had an old army field phone generator, crank on that puppy who put out a nice little zap.


Yup that's exactly what it was.

79 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:51:10pm

re: #76 CyanSnowHawk

This is just a hypothesis, mind you, but I think the women save up their pain allocation for meaningful things, like child birth, while the men just waste theirs on things that usually start out with one of them saying, "Hey, check this out."

/

Hey, check this out...
Hey, watch this...
Hold, my beer for a sec...

80 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:51:13pm
Freshwater, according to an independent report, used an electrostatic device to mark a cross on the arm of one of his students, causing pain to the student the night of the incident and leaving a mark that lasted for approximately three weeks.

What a monster.  How typical of the IDiot Fundii.  They're lucky they're only being sued.  If Mr. Secretly-Afraid-I'm-Gay had laid one hand on a child of mine, I'd've done my best to send him home to Jesus a tad early.

}:)     [What a maroon!]

81 ec marm  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:51:29pm

re: #54 Killgore Trout

My dad brought one home for me to play with. We started booby trapping things around the house (door knobs, railings, etc) and try to shock each other. He took it away after I rigged to toilet and waited for him to pee.


Hehehe. You probably have a respect for electricity and open circuits that you may not have otherwise experienced. I know I did. Nothing like the experience of it being physically impossible to open your hands while receiving a shock to clue a person in. I went on to several decades of safely working with, and repairing electrical connections. With a respect for electricity I might not otherwise have had. Bad teacher but a good lesson.

82 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:53:03pm

re: #78 Killgore Trout

Yup that's exactly what it was.

Such toys would be considered child abuse now, pocket knives, etc... When I was 10 spending a summer in WY with friends we wandered all over the place with .22 rifles.

83 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:53:29pm

re: #72 Beobachter

On Live Leak. too.

ROTFLMAO

84 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:56:18pm

Cat-Sized Reptiles Once Lived in Antarctica


Cat-sized reptiles once roamed what is now the icebox of Antarctica, snuggling up in burrows and peeping above ground to snag plant roots and insects.

The evidence for this scenario comes from preserved burrow casts discovered in the Transantarctic Mountains, which extend 3,000 miles (4,800 km) across the polar continent and contain layers of rock dating back 400 million years.

85 Quilly Mammoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:56:37pm

OT

A poison known as 1080 is used to control mammal populations. It is particularly useful in controlling invasive species in New Zealand and Australia such as rats, rabbits and possum. Animal Rights activists hate it. So what did a bunch these fruitloops do at a protest in New Zealand? Why they scattered it about the local city park.

Protesters against the use of 1080 poison are believed to have dumped what appear to be 1080 pellets in Christchurch's Hagley Park.

The pellets were found this morning in an area of the park near Harper Avenue.

86 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:57:08pm

I wonder if this is the kind of teacher we'd be getting if the ID advocates got their way- one who forced their morality on other people's kids with their declarations of sin....ones who called science "false".

This man harmed his students in mulitple ways. He physically abused them, and he harmed their education. But what's also being missed is these were middle school students. Kids who are at a place in their development that's already pretty awkward for them. How many of his students were gay- and what has he done to them psychologically?

I'm really disgusted by this man's behavior, and I certainly hope any ID advocates out there repudiate this man and not embrace him. He's done your cause a MAJOR disservice.

87 debutaunt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:58:47pm

re: #56 Killgore Trout

I have a built in instinct that I tune out with too much talking. Nagging causes a very visceral reaction with me. I've decided to stay single. It's best for everybody.

Yikes. I thought you might have had a 'peeing' accident.

88 Racer X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:59:11pm

re: #84 Killgore Trout

They evolved into Leopard Seals right?

89 Gordon Marock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:59:19pm

I think Charles is right on many levels for shining a spotlight on ID. After all, a big problem with radical Islam is the 'schools' that believe everything you need to know about the World is in the Quran. Thus science and every other discipline are squeezed out, and whole societies suffer. The ID people want to use the Bible as a science text, and don't care about the scientific method because it undermines the 'infallability' of the Bible.

90 Racer X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 2:59:56pm

re: #85 Quilly Mammoth

2 legs bad; 4 legs good.

91 debutaunt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:00:05pm

re: #61 Paul

Unfortunately, you're right. Here in SE Wisconsin the teachers' union is very strong and it protects its members, no matter how ill prepared incompetent or absent they are. It takes something very serious, as a physical/sexual assault, blatant drug abuse* or overt criminality to get fired.

*Recently, a Milwaukee Public School teacher was arrested for growing marijuana in his house and selling it to students.

The union sure is being protective of the wrong people.

92 greenmiler  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:00:10pm

re: #81 ec marm

Hehehe. You probably have a respect for electricity and open circuits that you may not have otherwise experienced. I know I did. Nothing like the experience of it being physically impossible to open your hands while receiving a shock to clue a person in. I went on to several decades of safely working with, and repairing electrical connections. With a respect for electricity I might not otherwise have had. Bad teacher but a good lesson.

I learned a long time ago; respect electricity, be afraid of ground .
Ground makes the connection and kills you. I've been in a few situations where I had to work around live wires; I always watched what was around me like pipes and sheet metal.


This guy sounds like a real nutball

93 ironbill  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:00:41pm

Ouch... That's gonna leave a mark.

(somebody around here had to be the one to say that)

94 ec marm  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:00:46pm

re: #76 CyanSnowHawk

This is just a hypothesis, mind you, but I think the women save up their pain allocation for meaningful things, like child birth, while the men just waste theirs on things that usually start out with one of them saying, "Hey, check this out."

/


Probably, but one should never, ever underestimate the power of testosterone to compel young males into performing feats of strength(?) before young females. It hurt like hell, and some got bruises, but I can't remember any male member of the class that didn't volunteer.

95 debutaunt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:01:00pm

re: #62 LeePro

OT

The hazards of owning a Big Screen TV.

Media not found...

96 Ma Sands  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:01:06pm

re: #6 Shug

This Freshwater story is a bit murky. We should dive deeper and attempt to get to the bottom of it


Yes. Even with such an attempt, though, Shug, it is likely the murkiness would persist. The world is like that....

97 Beobachter  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:02:35pm

re: #95 debutaunt

Media not found...

Works for me. i just tried it again.

98 Airborn Swine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:03:15pm

Sigh...

Mo elbaradai goes on about this, and our Lizardoid Master decided to obsess about some teacher in Ohio supporting ID. Gotta fry the big fish first I guess.

99 Olderthandirt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:03:24pm

Can't we give'em to the VLWC crowd? It's not fair that we have even these few nutcases! Isn't the VLWC crowd supposed to have'em all?

100 gopninja  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:03:49pm

almost darwin award worthy

101 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:04:15pm

re: #89 Gordon Marock

I think Charles is right on many levels for shining a spotlight on ID. After all, a big problem with radical Islam is the 'schools' that believe everything you need to know about the World is in the Quran. Thus science and every other discipline are squeezed out, and whole societies suffer. The ID people want to use the Bible as a science text, and don't care about the scientific method because it undermines the 'infallability' of the Bible.

Exactly!

102 debutaunt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:04:16pm

re: #95 debutaunt

Media not found...

Oooops - worked on my second try.

103 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:04:31pm

re: #100 gopninja

almost darwin award worthy

that is clever and funny on so many levels

104 greenmiler  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:05:10pm
105 Airborn Swine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:05:38pm

re: Me 98

His house his rules of course, was just hoping the tube was tuned to the game...

106 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:05:40pm

re: #94 ec marm

Probably, but one should never, ever underestimate the power of testosterone to compel young males into performing feats of strength(?) before young females. It hurt like hell, and some got bruises, but I can't remember any male member of the class that didn't volunteer.

And it was probably all for the same two (prettiest) girls (in the class).

107 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:05:46pm

re: #98 Airborn Swine

Yeah- maybe you missed the part where this guy abused his student.

108 Airborn Swine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:07:32pm

re: #107 Sharmuta

Yeah I caught it, but had the ID part not been present Big-C would never have given it a second thought.

109 Racer X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:09:11pm

re: #104 greenmiler

LOL!

I liked the whimper at the very end.

110 moonstone  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:09:16pm

I have no idea why I'm chiming in, because I think we all have better things to spend our time talkng about -- but I always thought that intelligent design was different from creationism?

I thought intelligent design merged evolution with God -- as in the big bang, dinosaurs, millions of years, etc. are all correct but with evidence of a guiding force (i.e., God) from such things as patterns found over and over - Fibonacci's number, the golden ratio, etc. Am I wrong? (I know this is the place to be corrected if I am!)

111 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:10:19pm

re: #108 Airborn Swine

Uncalled for.

112 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:10:24pm

re: #110 moonstone

Here- read the Wedge Strategy and keep in mind this is a political movement.

113 ec marm  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:10:29pm

I'm of the opinion that ID should be taught in the classroom, along with topics like phrenology and astrology. To a "dictionary" level of understanding. Not an entire semester, or extensive reading or testing, just a general knowledge.
Witness the 'troofers' in our society that are unable to separate wisdom from ignorance. Maybe someone can explain methods to develop critical thinking skills without examples of foolishness or unprovable ideas, but I can't.

114 MarineMomSue  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:10:54pm

I looked online for "High Frequency Generator" to find out what the heck it was.
I found this salon supply site selling these gadgets.

It says
"Provides a tingling sensation for hair or skin care salon treatments."

Is this likely the kind of thing used on the kid's arm?

115 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:11:15pm

re: #104 greenmiler

Heres a guy that should have paid more attention to electricity :)

Reminds me of the few of the guys i work with....
Electrical Engineers.

116 Airborn Swine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:12:05pm

re: #111 Lynn B.

Are you saying untrue, or just not to be commented ?

117 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:13:18pm

re: #111 Lynn B.

Lynn- I saw your comment the other night, and I don't know if you saw my response to you, but if you didn't I just wanted to say thanks- it meant a to to me.

118 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:13:46pm

re: #117 Sharmuta

Er- meant a lot.

119 MandyManners  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:13:56pm

re: #79 JCM

Hey, check this out...
Hey, watch this...
Hold, my beer for a sec...

"I wonder what this thing does."

120 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:14:50pm

re: #98 Airborn Swine

Sigh...

Mo elbaradai goes on about this, and our Lizardoid Master decided to obsess about some teacher in Ohio supporting ID. Gotta fry the big fish first I guess.

You must have missed that topic here yesterday, because you were obsessing over the intelligent design posts.

121 paint-right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:16:31pm

leave it all out , ID, etc, etc, because if you let one in, the rest will be clamoring for equal time and you-know-who's religion and beliefs will demand entrance and the alleged prophet whose picture cannot be shown and who is allegedly offended by everything will be in there demanding his own way and kicking out all the others.

122 MandyManners  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:17:58pm

re: #120 Charles

LOL!

123 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:19:00pm

re: #110 moonstone

Please also see this about Phillip Johnson- author of the Wedge Strategy.

Johnson asserts that theistic evolution, progressive creationism, and other philosophies that try to integrate science and religion are misguided attempts by people of faith to accommodate academia by "accepting not just the particular conclusions that scientists have reached but also the naturalistic methodology that generated those conclusions." He criticizes those who accept the understanding of the material world that is presented by methodological naturalism yet still express faith that God exists. Their reasoning draws a dichotomy between faith and science that Johnson considers to be irrational.

So the ID movement thinks you people who are fine with both science and religion are irrational. Personally- I think it's called "projection".

124 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:19:23pm

re: #116 Airborn Swine

Totally untrue. And I think you know it.

125 paint-right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:19:56pm

re: #121 paint-right

leave it all out , ID, etc, etc, because if you let one in, the rest will be clamoring for equal time and you-know-who's religion and beliefs will demand entrance and the alleged prophet whose picture cannot be shown and who is allegedly offended by everything will be in there demanding his own way and kicking out all the others.

I mean except science, natch. If it's tracking down the truth , the truth will out. Meanwhile there's a gazillion fascinating and wondrous things to behold and study and contemplate already.

126 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:20:38pm

re: #77 mfarmer1

I'm glad you didn't, too.

127 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:20:49pm

I think that for anyone to make the assumption that this man represents all believers of ID, is a leap in clean logic. People everywhere try to force their beliefs on others. The greater urgency is this, as stated in #86 by Sharmuta:

This man harmed his students in mulitple ways. He physically abused them, and he harmed their education.

Take off the blinders and you will see that there are religious fanatics/freaks in every religion and in every political scenario.

I am not a strict creationist, IDer, evolutionist or any other one-size-fits-all protagonist, but I am, quite frankly, sick to death of people who treat those who don't believe as they do as the slime of the earth or eeeeeeeeeevil and expendable.

This man is clearly deranged, sick, twisted — and removing him was at the very least the right thing to do. We here at LGF pride ourseelves on being intelligent and capable of carrying on serious debate without resorting to debasing our opponent. I fear that we are veering away from this standard. I sincerely hope that we are not.

128 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:21:06pm

re: #117 Sharmuta

I did see it, Sharmuta. But by then the thread was (finally) dead.

Kind of you to say so. And thanks again. Ignorance is not bliss.

129 Airborn Swine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:21:36pm

re: #120 Charles

Excellent.

Good to know that ID hasn't completely overrun the original reason I became a dedicated lurker her at LGF. I was more than a bit worried that our friends in the Little Satan had been put on a back burner, most relieved to find out that I was wrong.

Thanks again Great One for all that you do to keep us little people informed, even if the occasional personal pet peeve rubs me a bit wrong.

(Wow. a personal response from Charles...kinda like getting on the Jumbo Tron at Turner Field) ;) A bit intimidating and exciting at the same time.

130 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:22:45pm
re: #16 theparson
re: #9 Sharmuta

You would think a

self-professed

Christian would know better to harm even a hair on a child. Guess I must have missed the verse in the Bible that said he could abuse another person's child.

Just because he says he is a Christian doesn't make him one. I can stand in my garage but it doesn't make me a car.

Ah, the old He-did-something-sinful-so-he-must-not-be-a-Real-T rue-Christian™ bugaboo.  And a fallacious comparisson, to add some wild tang to the millieu (after all, he COULD be a Real True Christian™, you have no way to know for sure, but he couldn't be an automobile.  Or is there some special ID theorum that dictates that a person could be such a machine?).

It's always hard to fathom that while self-professed Christians like yourself and this gentlemen, would always profess that they and their fellow Christians were sinners, etc., if there was any stepping over the line and something bad resulted (like an actual sin navigated), the Christianhood of the offensive person would be questioned by their fellows (read that: throw under the bus), who would themselves seem to profess divine knowledge of who was and was not a Real True Christian™.

Glad to know that you're not a Christian, but only a self-professed Christian, though.

}:)     [Though clearly you shouldn't profess to be a logician!]

131 ted  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:22:47pm

re: #98 Airborn Swine

Sigh...

Mo elbaradai goes on about this, and our Lizardoid Master decided to obsess about some teacher in Ohio supporting ID. Gotta fry the big fish first I guess.

You're a day late and a shekel short. The IAEA's toothless and neutered pink poodle's hissy fit was well covered.

132 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:23:35pm

re: #95 debutaunt

Media not found...

Try again. Works for me... maybe refresh your page?

133 GOPninja  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:23:39pm

re: #103 Shug

that is clever and funny on so many levels

im still lolling over it actually. i crack myself up.

134 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:23:56pm

re: #80 Kulhwch

What a monster.  How typical of the IDiot Fundii.  They're lucky they're only being sued.  If Mr. Secretly-Afraid-I'm-Gay had laid one hand on a child of mine, I'd've done my best to send him home to Jesus a tad early.

}:)     [What a maroon!]

I serioisly doubt it's typical of ID believers, Protestants, Christians, Yankees, Americans, humans, or primates.

135 stryker  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:23:58pm

Unfortunately, it looked to me like this blogpost associated people who believe the Universe has an "intelligent design" with violent mentally-unhinged criminal behavior, when in fact the article doesn't implicate most of them!

I share a principled commitment not to spend tax money on education that goes beyond rational thought, however I personally believe there is a meta-rational layer to the Universe extending to the First Cause of the Universe.

Nevertheless, I don't want public school teachers to preach their own preferred way to understand the non-rational foundations of the Universe. Public school teachers should teach only rational science, without passing off belief as fact.

After the risk of public-school brainwashing, individuals can choose for themselves whether rational thought and the scientific theory of evolution fit into an understanding of the design of the world as intelligent or non-intelligent.

136 GOPninja  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:24:24pm

hey are they hiding the comments on KOS now?

[Link: www.dailykos.com...]

not showing up for me, are they hiding the dissention in their ranks?

137 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:25:17pm

re: #127 LeePro

You posted this comment to the wrong person. I am not blind to fundamentalists. and, fyi, I oppose them. Go back to the earliest thread on this subject and you'll see I posted as much.

138 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:25:18pm

re: #136 GOPninja

[Link: www.dailykos.com...]

139 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:25:46pm

re: #138 Shug

[Link: www.dailykos.com...]

then hit VIEW COMMENTS.

they are there

140 MandyManners  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:26:15pm

re: #135 stryker

I have no idea what you just said.

141 ec marm  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:26:18pm

re: #121 paint-right

leave it all out , ID, etc, etc, because if you let one in, the rest will be clamoring for equal time and you-know-who's religion and beliefs will demand entrance and the alleged prophet whose picture cannot be shown and who is allegedly offended by everything will be in there demanding his own way and kicking out all the others.


I'm not sure I agree. I was exposed to a low level of understanding of all of the major religions in public school. Maybe those were different times, when no one was pushing an agenda upon the school board. I can't agree when schools have an entire month to explore and 'celebrate' Ramadan, but some exposure to all religions, imo, is less dangerous and more likely to promote a healthy skepticism to those with radical ideas.

142 Airborn Swine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:27:04pm

re: #124 Lynn B.

Really.

You believe that some kid being abused by a no-name teacher is bfe Ohio would have gotten ANYONES attention beyond the local news ? It happens daily in dozens of schools, and nobody notices at all, and I think you know it.

Otoh, my original concern has been dealt with most promptly by the LM himself, so rant ended, back to lurking.

Later lizards, I'll look in much later tonight.

143 Ringo the Gringo  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:27:30pm

Glad he's being fired, but intelligent design is not mentioned in the article.

Sounds to me like he was teaching a literal version of the first verses of the book of Genesis.

144 GOPninja  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:28:00pm

re: #139 Shug

then hit VIEW COMMENTS.

they are there

Ah yes I thought I was doing that, but perhaps I wasnt. Thanks.

145 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:28:34pm

re: #143 Ringo the Gringo

The fox story says "creationism", fwiw.

146 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:28:51pm

re: #143 Ringo the Gringo

Glad he's being fired, but intelligent design is not mentioned in the article.

Sounds to me like he was teaching a literal version of the first verses of the book of Genesis.

Lesson #1

Hold this M-80 while I light the fuse.....

147 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:29:39pm

re: #143 Ringo the Gringo

Glad he's being fired, but intelligent design is not mentioned in the article.

Sounds to me like he was teaching a literal version of the first verses of the book of Genesis.

Teacher Accused of Branding Kid With Cross.

In its report, released Thursday, the company found Freshwater "did improperly use an electrostatic device on the student who filed the report" and had violated Ohio State standards by "teaching creationism and intelligent design."

148 paint-right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:29:50pm

re: #141 ec marm

I'm not sure I agree. I was exposed to a low level of understanding of all of the major religions in public school. Maybe those were different times, when no one was pushing an agenda upon the school board. I can't agree when schools have an entire month to explore and 'celebrate' Ramadan, but some exposure to all religions, imo, is less dangerous and more likely to promote a healthy skepticism to those with radical ideas.

I meant their explanation of the universe in science class. Comparitive religion is not the subject under dscussion exactly, it is rather the insertion of first causes into science classes, first causes that are articles of faith of specific religions. Letting ID in gives them the entree they may be looking for IMHO.

149 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:31:16pm

You know, I'm getting kind of tired of all the Christian bashing going on at this site... I've been an avid reader of LGF for a couple of years now and I've noticed a real uptick in sarcastic, ad hominem attacks on Christianity and Christians, mostly centered around the whole "Intelligent Design" debate...

This guy may be a Christian, but he's also an idiot. There are many Christians who have balanced views on the theory of Evolution. And yet more and more, all I see at LGF is a constant distortion of the real issues and concerns that most Christians have.

I personally could care less whether "Evolution" is true or not, because I believe in a God who can encompass that possibility. But I am tired of "Evolution" being used as a cover for the agenda of people who want to completely remove any mention of God from the public forum and marginalize anyone who professes to believe in him.

If anything, I feel sorry for this guy. He should definitely be disciplined, maybe even fired, but he probably needs help too.

150 Kostya Lotz  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:31:27pm

yes...excellent!
God hates those queers, gotta burn them....teach has identity issues.

Just glad he didn't use wooden stakes, or silver bullets.

BTW...I'm thirsty, pint o'bitter here govnr'.

151 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:31:54pm

re: #12 Shug

I've read this several times and each time I read it , it makes less and less sense to me.

This man needs a psychiatric evaluation. Seriously

I shall splain.
The Bible says it's a sin. But if we have evolved, then it's a part of nature. If it's a part of nature, then God created it. If God created it, it can't be a sin.

So rather than admit the Bible is wrong, he decides that science is wrong.

152 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:31:56pm

re: #142 Airborn Swine

In case you hadn't noticed, a lot of things come to Charles' attention that nobody else notices. That's why a lot of us come here -- to find out about them.

Anyway, all's well that ends well. Glad your concern was dealt with to your satisfaction.

153 Ringo the Gringo  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:32:42pm

re: #145 Sharmuta

The fox story says "creationism", fwiw.

To me creationism means a literal understanding of the Biblical story of creation....which is not the same thing as ID.

154 Gordon Marock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:03pm

Look, I am sick of all the attention for ID. Why aren't we studying the healing powers of crystals in science class.

155 Richard Romano  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:05pm

This guy is a nut, and should be fired, plain and simple. It has nothing to do, however, with the merits of ID; I'm sure there are some nutcase Darwinists out there too, who while they might not burn a Darwin fish on a student's arm, gladly and perniciously spread propaganda and misinformation about origins science.

156 HelloDare  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:09pm

Creationism----> Intelligent Design ----> Holding hands over ears and shouting "la-la-la-la-la-la"

157 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:12pm

I used to work for a school board (in Ontario, Canada). It is almost impossible to fire a teacher. Principals have no real power, thanks to the teachers' union.

My first thought when I read this news item was, "He had to assault a student before they could fire him".

I'd be very interested in reading this particular teacher's file. My guess is that if he is, or has been, diagnosed with a mental illness, he won't be fired but otherwise, he's just lost his job and his pension. I'd also guess that the administration has wanted to get rid of him for a very long time.

Sometimes the fervor of a "true believer" is caused more by fear than love. The more fundamentalist the belief system (including a literal belief in the devil), the more likely it is that fear is used by the preacher to manipulate and control the believers.

If the devil lurks everywhere, plotting endlessly to steal your soul, then you are never safe. If everyone else is literally at risk of burning in hell for all eternity and you might be the only one able to save their eternal souls, that fear can be a stronger motivation than love. (I'm sure this is not true of all fundamentalist believers.)

Keeping Bibles on his desk, feeling compelled to warn students against the dangers of believing anything that conflicts with a literal interpretation of the Bible, despite being reprimanded by his boss, are all signs of fanaticism or religious mania. On a personal level, I hope he is not too religious to go to a psychiatrist and get some help. It's one thing to have strong religious convictions; it's another thing to be unable to restrain yourself while at a secular workplace because you believe you are on a religious mission.

I've known people who were slightly unhinged in their religious beliefs; I think they were mentally ill. Some of those people toted around "Christian" books about a so-called Jewish conspiracy to control the world and/or a Catholic conspiracy to control the world.

Are they real Christians? Do they truly love God? I will leave that up to God; I can only judge someone's actions. I will just say that those types of people do not represent me or the fullness of my beliefs as a Christian. And, yes, that is a valid statement.

I'm guessing that the student let the teacher burn the cross into his arm but that his parents freaked out when they saw it (I would, too).

The teacher was wrong to do what he did. If he gets fired, it will be because he deserves it. However, I feel sorry for him on a personal level. I think he is unwell.

158 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:22pm

re: #149 MrSpock

If anyone is bashing Christians, it's the people at the discovery institute like phillip johnson who seems to think you're irrational far being fine with both God and evolution.

159 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:30pm

I am not excusing Freshwater who sounds like a lunatic.

but from examining that photo hf the child's arm it appears to have taken dozens of contact points to trace out that cross shape.

so I wonder what role the student play in this?
Unless Freshwater is 6 foot 6 and 350 lbs and held the student down, wouldn't one assume the student went along with this.

Did he get home and his mother Freaked out and he then blamed Freshwter?

again, the teacher ought to know better so ultimately he is the guilty party here.
Was brainwashing involved or is this kid a little Freshwater in training?

I think the whole story has yet to be told

160 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:30pm

Teachers have a contractual responsibility to teach the designated curriculum. Teachers have a moral and ethical responsibility to not hurt their students. The guy needs to go.

On the other hand, do not assume that this stuff does not go on everyday, across the country, in a myriad of ways. Unions protect bad an abusive teachers every single day. Creationists, or whatever this guy's thing is, do not corner the market on classroom abuses.

As Paul mentioned above, I taught within that SE Wisconsin Teacher's Union for many years. One big reason I got out is because there are a lot of people pushing their personal agendas , protected by the activists in the Teachers Unions. Most of them are communists. So you will never hear of THEIR abuses.

161 Syrah  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:45pm

re: #136 GOPninja

hey are they hiding the comments on KOS now?

[Link: www.dailykos.com...]

not showing up for me, are they hiding the dissention in their ranks?

This happens to me on occasion. There is a workaround.

Click on the Author's name at the top of the rant. This will take you to the authors blog. From there, click on the Discuss link at the bottom of the blog-rant.

162 DoubleU  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:33:56pm

re: #3 Sharmuta

I'm glad he was fired. He used his position to bully and abuse kids. Any teacher that does this should be shown the door and never allowed to teach again.

The whole school system would be gone.

163 Richard Romano  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:35:16pm

re: #154 Gordon Marock

Ha! Remember that pathetically silly quote in "Expelled"? Loosely, "On the backs of crystals" (!). Nice science there.

164 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:36:04pm

re: #162 DoubleU

The whole school system would be gone.

Amen.

Except goddess, and people like her. BTW - Goddess is a devout Christian.

165 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:36:34pm

re: #149 MrSpock

You think there is Christian bashing going on here? I believe you are being a tad sensitive.

This is an anti-idiotarian site. Idiocy in any form is scorned.

166 grybstein  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:36:40pm

I guess this guy thinks "intelligent design" means that it's a sign of intelligence to make a design in someone's arm.

167 MigueldowninMexico  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:37:20pm

OT

I have good news for those in the know:
Michael Sabah has resigned as Patriarch (Bishop) of Palestine.
The Pope accepted his resignation immediately. He has already appointed a succesor.

Good riddance, my name-sake; hope you do things with more justice in the future.

168 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:37:21pm

re: #157 Josephine

Keeping Bibles on his desk, [snip} are all signs of fanaticism or religious mania.

I respectfully disagree.

169 Ringo the Gringo  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:37:40pm

re: #147 Charles

I was reading the CNN article, which didn't say ID.

Glad he was fired ether way.

170 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:37:43pm

re: #153 Ringo the Gringo

To me creationism means a literal understanding of the Biblical story of creation....which is not the same thing as ID.

The article mentions both, which is unlikely, because you are correct. Intelligent design is a preemption of evolution. Creationism is the religious mythology of the origin of the world, existent in all religions.

171 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:37:49pm

I've a good friend. A Christian who teaches at the college level.

At the beginning of the of the school year with a freshman class he writes 3 questions on the board.

What is your source?
What is your purpose?
What is your destiny?

He then says, "unless you answer the these 3 question, your next 4 years here will be wasted."

If he student wants to follow up, he takes 'em out for coffee.

172 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:38:04pm

re: #166 grybstein

I guess this guy thinks "intelligent design" means that it's a sign of intelligence to make a design in someone's arm.

no doubt if he'd branded him with an Ohio state logo all would have been forgiven

173 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:38:33pm

More from phillip johnson:

Johnson calls his movement "The Wedge." The objective, he said, is to convince people that Darwinism is inherently atheistic, thus shifting the debate from creationism vs. evolution to the existence of God vs. the non-existence of God. From there people are introduced to "the truth" of the Bible and then "the question of sin" and finally "introduced to Jesus."

This is not about science- this is about a group of people trying to push their religion on children.

174 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:38:50pm

re: #172 Shug

no doubt if he'd branded him with an Ohio state logo all would have been forgiven

Or the Obama Seal

175 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:39:51pm

re: #174 pat
or Che'

176 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:39:55pm

re: #151 Hard Right

There are many things that are part of nature that are neither helpful or healthful. Not making a case for or against homosexuality with this statement. I'm just saying that what comes naturally is not always beneficial.

177 Ma Sands  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:40:18pm

re: #160 mama winger

I taught within that SE Wisconsin Teacher's Union for many years. One big reason I got out is because there are a lot of people pushing their personal agendas , protected by the activists in the Teachers Unions. Most of them are communists. So you will never hear of THEIR abuses.


Thank you. The article itself left much room for conjecture, as Shug noted above in comment #6. It is good to have background info added.

178 moonstone  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:40:23pm

re: #123 Sharmuta

Good links, thanks.

So basically I was mistaken about the entire concept of Intelligent Design. I had no idea it was so politicized. I must admit, it makes me feel a lot better about those of you who go ballistic (including Charles) whenever ID is mentioned! I should never have doubted the lizard master.

I guess there isn't a label for us "people who are fine with both science and religion." I'll just be thankful that no one is forcing us to choose between them.

179 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:41:19pm

re: #174 pat

Or the Obama Seal

Maybe Obama got the idea of the seal from DKOS..

180 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:41:37pm

re: #172 Shug

Could you imagine an algebra teacher branding the quadratic formula into a student's arm? From the fox article:

Freshwater's friend Dave Daubenmire defended him.

"With the exception of the cross-burning episode. ... I believe John Freshwater is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district,"

I highly doubt the algebra teacher would get this type of support.

181 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:42:18pm

re: #177 Ma Sands

Thank you. The article itself left much room for conjecture, as Shug noted above in comment #6. It is good to have background info added.

I literally could not stand the brainwashing anymore, Ma. What I'd like to see here is a broadening of perspective beyond ID, to include all the other types of hogwash radical agendas that are being pushed on our children.

182 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:42:20pm

re: #159 Shug

I am not excusing Freshwater who sounds like a lunatic.

but from examining that photo hf the child's arm it appears to have taken dozens of contact points to trace out that cross shape.

so I wonder what role the student play in this?
Unless Freshwater is 6 foot 6 and 350 lbs and held the student down, wouldn't one assume the student went along with this.

Did he get home and his mother Freaked out and he then blamed Freshwter?

again, the teacher ought to know better so ultimately he is the guilty party here.
Was brainwashing involved or is this kid a little Freshwater in training?

I think the whole story has yet to be told

Yes, he may have gone along with it. The question is whether or not the student knew what the outcome would be.
I'm sure it will be argued the teacher should have known better.

183 NonNativeTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:42:50pm

Apologies in advance for the repost.
Ok, here it goes. I believe in an intelligent designer. I also believe the theory of evolution is
correct. I definitely believe in the fossil records. I do not see how you can see all of the
unique species on the Australian continent and not believe in evolution. But what an intelligent designer explains for me is how the ball came into being and how it got rolling.
And as I have stated before, it explains the evolutionary leaps that appear in some of the fossil records.
I do not think that the idea of an intelligent designer should be taught in schools - because it
can never be scientifically proved or disproved. Evolution , conversely, can be proved , disproved or modified scientifically over time when more evidence is discovered. I understand
that the belief in an intelligent designer is much different than the intelligent design movement.
That difference is what causes so many misunderstandings when this topic is discussed.
Charles’s criticism of the ID movement itself is justified. But it should not be construed as an
attack on those of us who believe in an intelligent designer.

184 gopninja  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:43:20pm

re: #180 Sharmuta

Could you imagine an algebra teacher branding the quadratic formula into a student's arm?

I wish my teacher had done that!

185 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:43:33pm

re: #179 Thanos

Maybe Obama got the idea of the seal from DKOS..

Wonder how many sport the tattoo of that? or the Obama seal. Mark Of The Beast!

186 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:43:33pm

re: #149 MrSpock

You know, I'm getting kind of tired of all the accusations of Christian bashing going on at this site... I've been an avid reader of LGF for several years now and the number of posts that could honestly be characterized that way is miniscule and even those either stop short of real abuse or end up getting the commenter banned. And most of them now get dinged down or ignored.

187 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:43:33pm

re: #149 MrSpock

As a Christian, and a Lizard, I would like you to show me one statement of Charles that constitutes "Christian" bashing. Are there a few comments by lizards that are over the line, yes. But they are pretty generally called on it.

As for me, my beliefs and faith are not effected the least by anything posted here. Grow a thicker skin, and stand your ground. That is far better testimony than whining.

188 mfarmer1  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:43:35pm

re: #126 wolfie

re: #126 wolfie

I'm glad you didn't, too.

Yeah, you're probably right. Had he attempted such a thing, the lunatic fundie would have found the entire contents of "On the Origin of Species" across his torso.

189 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:43:46pm

re: #178 moonstone

For what it's worth- I believe in God, consider myself a Christian and have no doubts about evolution. But to people at the discovery institute- I'm the one who is irrational.

Thanks for taking the time to read my links. :)

190 FrogMarch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:44:29pm

Global Warming is a scam.... pass it on...


(meanwhile, leftists ignore China's toxic industrial waste)
/It isn't the CO2, stupid.

191 moonstone  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:44:29pm

re: #183 NonNativeTexan

Well said, NNT. You probably speak for a lot of us.

192 Ringo the Gringo  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:44:42pm

re: #170 pat

The article mentions both, which is unlikely, because you are correct. Intelligent design is a preemption of evolution. Creationism is the religious mythology of the origin of the world, existent in all religions.

The only book I have read by a proponent of ID was The Hidden Face of God by Gerald Schrodder and that book accepts evolution.

I agree with most of the people here, that ID does not belong in a science class, but I do think that it is a worthy subject for a philosophy class.

193 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:44:54pm

re: #181 mama winger

I literally could not stand the brainwashing anymore, Ma. What I'd like to see here is a broadening of perspective beyond ID, to include all the other types of hogwash radical agendas that are being pushed on our children.

The problem is that doesn't fit the agenda of the Discovery Institute, they would rather go after science as the root of all evil rather than the marxist moral relativism being taught in teaching schools. The humorous thing about this is that the real radicals in teaching hate scientists and science as well and have for decades.

194 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:44:56pm

re: #181 mama winger

For instance - there was a case here locally a few years ago where one junior high teacher , teaching American History, wanted to delete all references to the Presidents, because they were all white landowners and therefore oppressors, I guess. He wanted to teach American History from the view point of the 'oppressed'.

I think this kind of crapola is every bit as dangerous as ID.

195 Iron Fist  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:45:18pm

re: #180 Sharmuta,

You might be surprised. It depends on the area. Remember the evidence Zombie has shown of the Berkeley area high-schools teaching Marxism and anti-Americanism, including letting the kids out of class to attend Code Pink propaganda rallies? Same difference here, really. In both cases the teacher (s) overstep their bounds to the detriment of the student.

196 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:45:53pm

re: #168 mama winger

I respectfully disagree.

That isn't what was said MW. There was much more to it.

197 Luigi  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:46:29pm

Peru is facing record cold temperatures.

[Link: gatewaypundit.blogspot.com...]

198 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:46:31pm

re: #193 Thanos

The problem is that doesn't fit the agenda of the Discovery Institute, they would rather go after science as the root of all evil rather than the marxist moral relativism being taught in teaching schools. The humorous thing about this is that the real radicals in teaching hate scientists and science as well and have for decades.

I could give two hoots what the Discovery Institute addresses. I am saying I would like to see US address it.

199 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:47:03pm

re: #196 Hard Right

That isn't what was said MW. There was much more to it.

But is was included as one sign of mania. I disagree. That's all.

200 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:47:09pm

re: #194 mama winger

That whole deconstructionist view is one of the greatest evils in education today.

201 Ma Sands  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:47:50pm

re: #181 mama winger

All the way through the lower grades, and high school years of my kids, I was present, often.....gave me much opportunity to have an effect on the teachers, as well as mine own kids.....

I would've preferred to home school, but wasn't able to......I figure what i did do, was quite effective.....wish I could put my kids up, as exhibit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7..... :)

202 infidel4ever  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:48:22pm

Came across this site the other day, a sort of a DIY-guide to spread Islam in schools:

[Link: www.dawanet.com...]

Take a look at the methodical way they go about it...

The bottom line

We should use every opportunity to sensitize non-Muslim peers and school staff to Islam and to establish an environment in which everywhere a non-Muslim turns, he notices Islam portrayed in a positive way, is influenced by it and eventually accepts Islam with Allah's guidance, Insha Allah (if God wills).

203 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:48:24pm

re: #192 Ringo the Gringo

The only book I have read by a proponent of ID was The Hidden Face of God by Gerald Schrodder and that book accepts evolution.

I agree with most of the people here, that ID does not belong in a science class, but I do think that it is a worthy subject for a philosophy class.

I agree entirely, and in fact took philosophy classes that dealt with the subject long before ID was id'ed.

204 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:48:31pm

re: #200 Thanos

That whole deconstructionist view is one of the greatest evils in education today.

Absolutely. Which is one reason I got out, and now work with doggies. :)

205 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:49:24pm

re: #199 mama winger

But is was included as one sign of mania. I disagree. That's all.

Taken as a whole I would agree with what they said. By itself, I would not. I think that was the point-the totality of the teacher's actions/behavior.

206 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:50:12pm

re: #204 mama winger

Here's some pics of Kasie in case you missed them the other night, she's grown a bit :)
[Link: noblesseoblige.org...]

207 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:50:55pm

re: #201 Ma Sands

All the way through the lower grades, and high school years of my kids, I was present, often.....gave me much opportunity to have an effect on the teachers, as well as mine own kids.....

I would've preferred to home school, but wasn't able to......I figure what i did do, was quite effective.....wish I could put my kids up, as exhibit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7..... :)

I didn't have what it takes to homeschool either Ma. I think I would have gone nuts. Too much of a perfectionist - I would have lost patience with my own.

But I did send them to private schools, which for us was a great choice. I also talked talked talked with them every night about what they had learned, and often took a Devil's advocate position to see if they could logically defend their thoughts. It was a lot of work. Kids are a lot of work either way, eh ?

208 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:50:57pm

re: #195 Iron Fist

And I don't disagree, however I'm inclined to agree with Thanos' #193. Science teaches the very things that could help students see through this crap- like observation and rational thinking. No wonder it's under attack.

209 mfarmer1  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:51:05pm

re: #149 MrSpock

You know, I'm getting kind of tired of all the Christian bashing going on at this site... I've been an avid reader of LGF for a couple of years now and I've noticed a real uptick in sarcastic, ad hominem attacks on Christianity and Christians, mostly centered around the whole "Intelligent Design" debate...

This guy may be a Christian, but he's also an idiot. There are many Christians who have balanced views on the theory of Evolution. And yet more and more, all I see at LGF is a constant distortion of the real issues and concerns that most Christians have.

I personally could care less whether "Evolution" is true or not, because I believe in a God who can encompass that possibility. But I am tired of "Evolution" being used as a cover for the agenda of people who want to completely remove any mention of God from the public forum and marginalize anyone who professes to believe in him.

If anything, I feel sorry for this guy. He should definitely be disciplined, maybe even fired, but he probably needs help too.

He's no different than all the crazies we see on MEMRI, just a different religion, that's all. You'd be all over this guy if he wasn't, well, you know.

210 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:51:35pm

re: #159 Shug

That's a good point. I was actually starting the wonder the same thing. We'll see...

211 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:51:35pm

re: #206 Thanos

Here's some pics of Kasie in case you missed them the other night, she's grown a bit :)
[Link: noblesseoblige.org...]

I bet she's a high maintanance doggy! Lots of energy.

212 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:51:38pm

re: #206 Thanos

Here's some pics of Kasie in case you missed them the other night, she's grown a bit :)
[Link: noblesseoblige.org...]

OMG - look at that face! Who could not love that face!

I love Aussies. Does she wear you out?

213 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:52:39pm

re: #160 mama winger

Exactly.
The NEA has a political agenda. And I don't mean wanting to raise salaries or suck more money down the education drain. I'm talking about the promotion of leftist and "enlightened" views through the public schools.
All you have to do is go to their website and see what their state and national conventions are all about. We're not talking workshops on how to improve math skills!

214 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:52:39pm

re: #208 Sharmuta

And I don't disagree, however I'm inclined to agree with Thanos' #193. Science teaches the very things that could help students see through this crap- like observation and rational thinking. No wonder it's under attack.

Every kid should take a class in Logic during High School, or at least by the time they are in college.

215 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:53:25pm

re: #211 Hard Right

Well she does this thing where she occasionally gets frenetic and runs sideways across the walls, but otherwise she's pretty placid as Aussie's go.

216 MandyManners  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:53:38pm

re: #185 pat

Wonder how many sport the tattoo of that? or the Obama seal. Mark Of The Beast!

It does look like a phoenix.

217 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:53:41pm

re: #165 WhiteRasta

re: #165 WhiteRasta

You think there is Christian bashing going on here? I believe you are being a tad sensitive.

This is an anti-idiotarian site. Idiocy in any form is scorned.

Exactly my point. One of the reasons why I continually come to LGF is that historically it has been a bedrock of logical debate. But over the last year, this has changed and I am seeing constant portrayals of anyone who believes in ID (or any variation thereof) as a fanatical, bible thumping nut-cake, on par with the Islamo-faciscts in terms of reasoning ability. Usually I just sigh and pass on by, but the constant attitude is tiresome.

No culture is impervious to the corruption of its values, not even this one. If this keeps up, LGF is going to alienate a lot of people who share a common cause...

Just my .02 cents...

218 freetoken  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:54:12pm

re: #98 Airborn Swine

Discussed thousands of times here.... we already know the issues, the problems, the objections, the fantasies... pretty much everything but the outcome.

To me, Charles' interest in the ID controversy (and the social milieu in which it is embedded) is both interesting and sheds light on a great many things.

219 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:54:24pm

re: #86 Sharmuta

Total absolute agreement.

}:)     <thumbs up>

220 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:54:29pm

re: #213 wolfie

Exactly.
The NEA has a political agenda. And I don't mean wanting to raise salaries or suck more money down the education drain. I'm talking about the promotion of leftist and "enlightened" views through the public schools.
All you have to do is go to their website and see what their state and national conventions are all about. We're not talking workshops on how to improve math skills!

That's why I think this limited focus on ID should be broadened IMO. There is some really batshit crazy stuff taught to kids these days that has nothing to do with anything but a leftist agenda. They are literally holding our kids captive for 7 hours a day and indoctrinating them into radical liberalism.

221 Ma Sands  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:54:29pm

re: #207 mama winger

It was a lot of work. Kids are a lot of work


Yup.....takes all ya got, and more.... :)

222 MandyManners  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:54:51pm

bbl

223 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:55:25pm

re: #217 MrSpock

Please- understand the difference between ID the political movement, and ID in the sense of personal belief in God and science. The side of the political movement thinks the other side is irrational.

224 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:55:41pm

re: #215 Thanos

Well she does this thing where she occasionally gets frenetic and runs sideways across the walls, but otherwise she's pretty placid as Aussie's go.

Is she a swimmer? Swimming is a great energy-depleting exercise for dogs.

225 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:56:37pm

re: #224 mama winger

Is she a swimmer? Swimming is a great energy-depleting exercise for dogs.

I haven't taken her swimming yet, she's only six months old, but it's a great idea and I'll try it out.

226 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:56:55pm

re: #190 FrogMarch

It's nice to see someone giving a thorough Fisking to The Goracle.

CO2 is not a pollutant.

227 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:56:59pm

Good evening, Lizards.

My thoughts:

1. This teacher is being fired for being insubordinate. He didn't do (or stop doing) as he was told. This is the simpliest way to fire a bad teacher because it can be proved beyond "you did this"/"no I didn't." No teachers' union can stop that AS LONG AS the administrator has done his or her job. I argue that there is one of the problems: administrators knowing what's going on.

2. A teacher is to teacher the curriculum approved by the District. He or she CANNOT hold students accountable for anything else.

3. The Bible is a work of literature foundational to Western Civilization. Some also believe it to be the Holy Word of God. There is nothing wrong with having the Bible in a class room; there is everything wrong with telling students that if they don't believe it to be holy, they're damned.

228 DistantThunder  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:57:09pm

re: #217 MrSpock

re: #165 WhiteRasta

Exactly my point. One of the reasons why I continually come to LGF is that historically it has been a bedrock of logical debate. But over the last year, this has changed and I am seeing constant portrayals of anyone who believes in ID (or any variation thereof) as a fanatical, bible thumping nut-cake, on par with the Islamo-faciscts in terms of reasoning ability. Usually I just sigh and pass on by, but the constant attitude is tiresome.

No culture is impervious to the corruption of its values, not even this one. If this keeps up, LGF is going to alienate a lot of people who share a common cause...

Just my .02 cents...

I think it has more to do with the arm-twisting insistence of some to teach it in the schools. Your or my personal belief in ID, has no impact on society at large.

229 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:57:28pm

re: #225 Thanos

I haven't taken her swimming yet, she's only six months old, but it's a great idea and I'll try it out.

It's best to do it when they are young, so that they view it as a natural thing and don't get phobic about the water and all. 6 months would be great!

230 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:58:08pm

re: #227 goddessoftheclassroom

Hi goddess. :)

100% agreement.

231 FrogMarch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:59:17pm
232 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:59:45pm

re: #98 Airborn Swine

Sigh...

Mo elbaradai goes on about this, and our Lizardoid Master decided to obsess about some teacher in Ohio supporting ID. Gotta fry the big fish first I guess.

Charles:

Are you obsessed?  Me and the guys can pool up and get you some meds if you are.  You just say the word, we're on it.  We certainly don't want you obsessed.  Well, not much, anyway.

}:)     [What else is a good lizard army for?]

233 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 3:59:57pm

re: #229 mama winger

It's best to do it when they are young, so that they view it as a natural thing and don't get phobic about the water and all. 6 months would be great!

Well she's a bit phobic when we give her a bath, on the other hand she loves to bite the streams of water from the garden hose as we water the garden, it's hilarious watching her try to catch the water.

234 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:00:00pm

re: #186 Lynn B.

You know, I'm getting kind of tired of all the accusations of Christian bashing going on at this site... I've been an avid reader of LGF for several years now and the number of posts that could honestly be characterized that way is miniscule and even those either stop short of real abuse or end up getting the commenter banned. And most of them now get dinged down or ignored.

well, I disagree... but your sarcasm proves my point... I was trying to make (IMO) a rational appeal to try and bring more civility back into this community, and you lash out at me in an emotional response... thanks...

235 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:00:37pm

re: #213 wolfie

Exactly.
The NEA has a political agenda. And I don't mean wanting to raise salaries or suck more money down the education drain. I'm talking about the promotion of leftist and "enlightened" views through the public schools.
All you have to do is go to their website and see what their state and national conventions are all about. We're not talking workshops on how to improve math skills!

You're absolutely correct. NCTE (National Council of Teachers of English) does, too. I have to belong to the NEA because I belong to my local association (collective bargaining and many other benefits), but I do not make any political contributions (and are dues do NOT go to such causes). I will not join NCTE because of their blatant political agenda.

236 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:01:22pm

re: #215 Thanos

Well she does this thing where she occasionally gets frenetic and runs sideways across the walls, but otherwise she's pretty placid as Aussie's go.

That's perfectly normal. :o

My mom's friend had one, maybe a year old when we babysat her. Just trying to walk down the hallway was a chore. She kept trying to herd us into different rooms!

237 Ma Sands  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:01:29pm

re: #227 goddessoftheclassroom

there is everything wrong with telling students that if they don't believe it to be holy, they're damned.


Well, the worst thing about that, is that that approach doesn't work --except perhaps for one in a million who'd hear it, and then that would only be the straw that broke the camel's back anyway..... :)

238 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:01:38pm

re: #234 MrSpock

Sorry- Lynn offered up a good comment there- that was hardly lashing out.

239 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:01:57pm

re: #234 MrSpock

No sarcasm intended, Spock. And I can assure you there was no emotion involved, just the facts as I see them. But if that's how you read it, sorry.

240 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:01:57pm

re: #225 Thanos

I haven't taken her swimming yet, she's only six months old, but it's a great idea and I'll try it out.

Labs should be in water at 2 months. BTW, water exercise is much healthier for Labs than field work. They damage joints very easily. Built for water.

241 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:02:15pm

re: #151 Hard Right

I shall splain.
The Bible says it's a sin. But if we have evolved, then it's a part of nature. If it's a part of nature, then God created it. If God created it, it can't be a sin.

So rather than admit the Bible is wrong, he decides that science is wrong.

It doesn't even have to be that black and white.

I choose to accept certain things in the Bible as being religiously true. However, I also have a good understanding of human nature and I cannot believe that the accounts in the Bible were 1) dictated by God and 2) necessarily 100 percent accurate at the start, let alone perfect and unchanged throughout history.

I also try to separate the spiritual from the social. So, for example, I think that the admonition against homosexuality reflected the social mores of the time, not God's divine edict. (I don't know how to do the accent over the e in mores; sorry.)

So that man doesn't have to decide the Bible is wrong but he does have to decide that it is not all literally 100 percent a divine command from God.

242 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:02:26pm

re: #236 Hard Right

That's perfectly normal. :o

My mom's friend had one, maybe a year old when we babysat her. Just trying to walk down the hallway was a chore. She kept trying to herd us into different rooms!

Yeah, she does that as well. We broke her of doing it on the stairs, but otherwise we like to play along.

243 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:02:41pm

Saving Darwin: How to Be a Christian and Believe in Evolution

So far- I'm enjoying this book quite a bit.

244 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:03:05pm

re: #234 MrSpock

well, I disagree... but your sarcasm proves my point... I was trying to make (IMO) a rational appeal to try and bring more civility back into this community, and you lash out at me in an emotional response... thanks...

Spock, your Human side is showing you damned half breed.

/bones

245 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:03:32pm

re: #137 Sharmuta

You posted this comment to the wrong person. I am not blind to fundamentalists. and, fyi, I oppose them. Go back to the earliest thread on this subject and you'll see I posted as much.

I didn't post my comment "to" anyone. Neither am I a fundamentalist, and, like you, I strongly oppose them. The quote I used (clearly attributed to your #86) was in support of that — your — statement!

What alarms me is the knee-jerk mentality attached to many who hold sincere religious beliefs.

I am not defending ID.
I am not defending Creationism.
Nor am I defending religious faith in general, or the lack thereof.
And I am most certainly not defending anyone's assertion that religious beliefs should be taught, per se, in our public school system!

246 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:03:35pm

re: #237 Ma Sands

Well, the worst thing about that, is that that approach doesn't work --except perhaps for one in a million who'd hear it, and then that would only be the straw that broke the camel's back anyway..... :)

I agree, but even if it did work, it would be wrong in a class room.

247 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:04:07pm

re: #187 JCM

As a Christian, and a Lizard, I would like you to show me one statement of Charles that constitutes "Christian" bashing. Are there a few comments by lizards that are over the line, yes. But they are pretty generally called on it.

As for me, my beliefs and faith are not effected the least by anything posted here. Grow a thicker skin, and stand your ground. That is far better testimony than whining.

I'm sorry, please show me where I accused "Charles" of anything...

248 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:04:21pm

re: #225 Thanos

I haven't taken her swimming yet, she's only six months old, but it's a great idea and I'll try it out.

Oh , an Aussie. for some reason i thought uou had a Lab pup. Aussies have unlimited field energy. Love games. Speaking of which, I judge a dog show on the 28th. Likely to be some Aussies.

249 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:04:21pm

re: #232 Moi

re: Me 98

His house his rules of course, was just hoping the tube was tuned to the game...

At last, we've got them talking to themselves!

}:)     [Echo!  Echo cho cho ... Cool!]

250 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:04:51pm

re: #234 MrSpock

MrSpock,

Your argument is not logical.

How is Lynn's response insulting or "lashing out" at you?

251 DistantThunder  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:04:57pm

re: #234 MrSpock

well, I disagree... but your sarcasm proves my point... I was trying to make (IMO) a rational appeal to try and bring more civility back into this community, and you lash out at me in an emotional response... thanks...

Sometimes people take offense at a strongly worded opinion. We conservatives should have built up thicker skins by now. I like controversial comments because they challenge me to find fault with the argument. Some take that too personally.

This is a great site. And civil for the most part. Go slumming over at a liberal site for contrast, and post a conservative comment, and watch the hell-fire and damnation reign down on you. I know, I have.

252 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:05:00pm

re: #233 Thanos

Take her to a place with a gradual sloping beach if you can, Then just go out in the water with her and start swimming. Get her to follow you along the shoreline. Make it hap hap happy! :)

253 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:05:29pm

re: #248 pat

You judge Dog Shows! How delightful! do you have a specialty?

254 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:05:45pm

re: #245 LeePro

OK- my apologies for misunderstanding your point, Lee.

255 Ma Sands  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:05:55pm

re: #246 goddessoftheclassroom

Now, perhaps.....but there will come a time.....

And, there is something that's been occurring, unbidden, to me lately: "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood...."

256 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:06:10pm

To those taking issue with Charles interest in ID.

Homework assignment.

Read the: THE WEDGE STRATEGY

Phase I.

* Scientific Research, Writing & Publicity

Phase II.

* Publicity & Opinion-making

Phase III.

* Cultural Confrontation & Renewal

The research and find the scriptural basis for this strategy.

My first issue is from a Christian perspective, it's fighting in the wrong realm.

My second issue is the law of unintended consequences. If we allow a religious based instruction into schools, what will you say when a religion you object too asks for the same access.

257 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:06:33pm

re: #241 Josephine

It doesn't even have to be that black and white.

I choose to accept certain things in the Bible as being religiously true. However, I also have a good understanding of human nature and I cannot believe that the accounts in the Bible were 1) dictated by God and 2) necessarily 100 percent accurate at the start, let alone perfect and unchanged throughout history.

I also try to separate the spiritual from the social. So, for example, I think that the admonition against homosexuality reflected the social mores of the time, not God's divine edict. (I don't know how to do the accent over the e in mores; sorry.)

So that man doesn't have to decide the Bible is wrong but he does have to decide that it is not all literally 100 percent a divine command from God.

It seems you and I are of the same mind.

My explanation was for that teacher and those just like him. I've come accross a few of them in my life and they make it that black and white.

258 FrogMarch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:07:28pm

re: #226 WhiteRasta

It's nice to see someone giving a thorough Fisking to The Goracle.

CO2 is not a pollutant.

AlGore should win the prize for biggest crock of BS.

259 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:07:34pm

re: #242 Thanos

Yeah, she does that as well. We broke her of doing it on the stairs, but otherwise we like to play along.

You wear sheep costumes? :P

260 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:07:43pm

re: #258 FrogMarch

AlGore should win the prize for biggest crock of BS.

He did.....

261 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:07:49pm

In about seven hours the Midinight Sun baseball game starts in Fairbanks, I need to get back up there one of these summers and catch a game soon.

262 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:08:00pm

re: #168 mama winger

I respectfully disagree.

Sure, we can disagree on that one. ; )

263 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:08:08pm

re: #252 mama winger

Take her to a place with a gradual sloping beach if you can, Then just go out in the water with her and start swimming. Get her to follow you along the shoreline. Make it hap hap happy! :)

I've got to tell you that when I read your first response above, I thought you were talking about A CHILD...

I'm so glad I was mistaken...

264 ciaospirit  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:08:23pm

re: #202 infidel4ever

From your link and parents better pay attention.

Students are routinely exposed in their classroom to new information and opinions, hence they tend to be more receptive to new beliefs and ideas.

Schools are therefore fertile grounds where the seeds of Islam can be sowed inside the hearts of non-Muslim students. Muslim students should take ample advantage of this opportunity and present to their schoolmates the beautiful beliefs of Islam.

265 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:08:23pm

re: #253 mama winger

You judge Dog Shows! How delightful! do you have a specialty?

Nah. The fanciers decided to use me on contests and timed events, and just continued over my objections, lol.

266 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:08:43pm

re: #263 goddessoftheclassroom

I've got to tell you that when I read your first response above, I thought you were talking about A CHILD...

I'm so glad I was mistaken...

AHAHAHAHA ! Oh my that makes me laugh out loud !

267 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:08:44pm

re: #256 JCM

My second issue is the law of unintended consequences. If we allow a religious based instruction into schools, what will you say when a religion you object too asks for the same access.

Exactly- a point that gets lost all too often, imo.

268 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:09:06pm

re: #261 Thanos

In about seven hours the Midinight Sun baseball game starts in Fairbanks, I need to get back up there one of these summers and catch a game soon.

Lizard meet-up!

269 freetoken  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:09:08pm

re: #190 FrogMarch

Here is a link to someone who discusses Mr. Coleman's claims.

270 Globular Cluster  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:09:23pm
That’s not quite the whole story, though; he also used a high frequency generator to burn a cross into a student’s arm.

Therefore, all proponents of intelligent design are cross-burning torturers. Sounds like the same criticism leveled at Ben Stein by some parties.

271 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:09:26pm

re: #265 pat

Nah. The fanciers decided to use me on contests and timed events, and just continued over my objections, lol.

What breeds are you partial to?

Fess up. You know you have favorites ;}

272 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:10:20pm

re: #262 Josephine

I can live with that :)

lol

273 mama winger  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:11:55pm

There's some tacos with my name on 'em.

bbl

274 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:12:30pm

re: #267 Sharmuta

Exactly- a point that gets lost all too often, imo.

This my position also. Benign discussion will quickly succumb to malignancy. Islam, Snake Handling, Atheism as a Religion and all kinds of BS when nthe kids should be learning real science and math. As I have always said. No one ever stopped me from praying before an exam for which I had put off study for 9 months.

275 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:13:11pm

re: #267 Sharmuta

Exactly- a point that gets lost all too often, imo.

The libertarian part of my political side often wars with my faith in these areas. However in the public arena, I always look beyond the immediate gain, to what might be. Could it be used in the future to restrict or license things even more unacceptable than the current situation.

276 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:13:52pm

re: #160 mama winger

Teachers have a contractual responsibility to teach the designated curriculum. Teachers have a moral and ethical responsibility to not hurt their students. The guy needs to go.

On the other hand, do not assume that this stuff does not go on everyday, across the country, in a myriad of ways. Unions protect bad an abusive teachers every single day. Creationists, or whatever this guy's thing is, do not corner the market on classroom abuses.

As Paul mentioned above, I taught within that SE Wisconsin Teacher's Union for many years. One big reason I got out is because there are a lot of people pushing their personal agendas , protected by the activists in the Teachers Unions. Most of them are communists. So you will never hear of THEIR abuses.

And communists, of course, do not want even the hint of the existence of God!

277 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:14:07pm

re: #274 pat

No one ever stopped me from praying before an exam for which I had put off study for 9 months.

And God's answer to that prayer....
I gave you 9 months to study.....

278 Ma Sands  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:14:10pm

re: #256 JCM

The realm, JCM, is more one of urgency of time, rather than place......the stumbling around will not drop to the ground.....

279 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:14:13pm

re: #271 mama winger

What breeds are you partial to?

Fess up. You know you have favorites ;}

Labs, Weimaraners , Bassets

280 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:14:18pm

re: #209 mfarmer1

He's no different than all the crazies we see on MEMRI, just a different religion, that's all. You'd be all over this guy if he wasn't, well, you know.

I wasn't defending this guy in any way... He's obviously got some issues and should not be using the classroom as a podium for his personal beliefs, much less branding a student with a cross.

My comments were about my perception that there is a lot of religious antagonism going on here directed at Christians, especially those who believe in ID...

281 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:14:39pm

John Dewey's effect on schools still lingers. Socialization of children is still a large part of the emphasis in schools. I think a school's role should be to prepare students for life as an adult. That means students come to school, learn skills that the business world requires, and go home. Sorry to be a party pooper, but school carnivals, birthday parties, crazy hair days, cheerleaders, and sports teams all have no business at school. Teachers should also not be taking on the role of parents. Discipline needs to be handled by parents, not by the school. Teachers have no business indoctrinating students with self- esteem babble or whatever the current mantra on sex education might be. Leave that to parents. Sounds radical, but the focus needs to be brought back to academics and not socialization. We need adults in society who can think critically and not ones who think they are entitled to more social benefits at taxpayers' expense

282 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:14:41pm

How about some atheist bashing....?
Atheist wants Frankenmuth to remove religious symbols

If this popular tourist mecca 80 miles north of Detroit wears Germany on one of its sleeves, the other contains Martin Luther.

Founded by Lutheran missionaries who vowed to retain their old ways, the community of 4,800 has one of the highest concentrations of Lutherans in the Midwest. The city seal contains a Luther rose, the symbol for Lutheranism.

So when local atheist Lloyd Clarke wanted to remove a cross from the seal, along with ones in a city park and on a state bridge, residents rose nearly as one against him.


Why do you guys always hurt my delicate feelings with constantly bashing godlessness?
/preemptive seethe

283 tokyobk  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:15:04pm

re: #241 Josephine

So that man doesn't have to decide the Bible is wrong but he does have to decide that it is not all literally 100 percent a divine command from God.


The issue as I see it, and where it does fit in to everything that is good about the Internet and LGF, is that there was a time when you did have to accept that holy texts were 100 percent divine, and in the case of Islam, there is still not unitarian or reconstructionist sect with any kind of power or influence over the religion. Women do get stones thrown at them for adultry in parts of the Muslim world.

Things we take for granted now about our world began as heresies.

The ability to say no to dogma and turn to proofs is what has caused every human advance and allowed humans to achieve things like penicillin and the Internet.

Fortunately for Christianity, the essential nature of Jesus is one that has so far stood the tests of time and culture as to what a good person is and how one should live one`s life.

284 Hard Right  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:15:16pm

re: #276 LeePro

And communists, of course, do not want even the hint of the existence of God!

Interferes with worship of the masters of the state.

285 Gordon Marock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:15:33pm

At the Jesuit High School I attended, Science class was taught by a priest, standing directly under a crucifix, and not once did he argue ID. We talked about God in religion class.

286 IslandLibertarian  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:16:20pm

re: #248 pat

Speaking of which, I judge a dog show on the 28th. Likely to be some Aussies.

Where will this show be? Honolulu? Lihue?

287 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:17:11pm

re: #270 Globular Cluster

Therefore, all proponents of intelligent design are cross-burning torturers.

I completely disagree. I'm surprised you would take a stance like that.

Oh ... wait. That was sarcasm?

Sorry for not getting it right away. I thought it was your opinion, because it sure isn't mine, and I didn't write anything that even suggested it was.

288 Syrah  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:18:55pm

This ID debate reminds of how I had to sit through a college biology course where the prof would constantly sprinkle her lectures with references to gaia.

It was annoying.

289 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:19:42pm

re: #275 JCM

The libertarian part of my political side often wars with my faith in these areas. However in the public arena, I always look beyond the immediate gain, to what might be. Could it be used in the future to restrict or license things even more unacceptable than the current situation.

That's very wise of you, and quite unfortunate more people don't apply this logic to policy issues.

290 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:19:43pm

re: #286 IslandLibertarian

Speaking of which, I judge a dog show on the 28th. Likely to be some Aussies.

Where will this show be? Honolulu? Lihue?

It is in Lihue

291 Cognito  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:19:48pm

Nut.

292 greenmiler  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:19:50pm

I find the ID arguement interesting and Charles and I don't agree (probably the only thing)but on the thread a few days ago, one lizard clearly took Charles side, but started hammering Christianity as a religion. Vile stuff that had nothing to do with ID. Charles took him outside and he hasn't been heard of since. I have nothing but respect for Charles

293 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:19:51pm

re: #214 mama winger

Every kid should take a class in Logic during High School, or at least by the time they are in college.

I start mine in 6 th grade.....go through a 3-yr sequence of basic formal logic and informal fallacies. We figure that kids that age are all little petti-foggers and rationalizers anyway, so we might as well teach them good arguing.

Needless to say, we often have to resort to an obscure fallacy called the argument ad baculam.....the appeal to power or brute force.

294 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:21:03pm

re: #239 Lynn B.

No sarcasm intended, Spock. And I can assure you there was no emotion involved, just the facts as I see them. But if that's how you read it, sorry.

I'm sorry too... I'm not very good at reading "tone" in a message... It came across as snarky to me... if that's all in my head, then I apologize...

295 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:21:03pm

Well, I think the jackass should have been fired! He's clearly a psycho!

As to the whole to teach or not to teach thing...I think both THEORIES should be taught. Just like the THEORY of Relativity is taught, the THEORY of Evolution, etc, etc.

And they should be taught as THEORY, because that's what they are. ID is a theory in some circles, just as Evolution is called the Theory of Evolution. Both should be taught in a secular manner...some believe or theorize...yada yada yada.

I also believe that the Bible can be used in literature classes, just as (dare I say it) the Koran...they are both works of literature.

The place that one gets hung up on is...wait for it...political or religious agenda. Of course, an involved parent can sway their child toward the direction they desire the child to go in...we do it as parents anyway.

296 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:21:38pm

re: #183 NonNativeTexan

Apologies in advance for the repost.
Ok, here it goes. I believe in an intelligent designer. I also believe the theory of evolution is
correct. I definitely believe in the fossil records. I do not see how you can see all of the
unique species on the Australian continent and not believe in evolution. But what an intelligent designer explains for me is how the ball came into being and how it got rolling.
And as I have stated before, it explains the evolutionary leaps that appear in some of the fossil records.
I do not think that the idea of an intelligent designer should be taught in schools - because it
can never be scientifically proved or disproved. Evolution , conversely, can be proved , disproved or modified scientifically over time when more evidence is discovered. I understand
that the belief in an intelligent designer is much different than the intelligent design movement.
That difference is what causes so many misunderstandings when this topic is discussed.
Charles’s criticism of the ID movement itself is justified. But it should not be construed as an
attack on those of us who believe in an intelligent designer.

*gasp!*

You've been inside my head. This is what I've (very poorly indeed!) been trying to say all along (and got down-dinged for it)!

BRAVO! ! ! And thank you!

297 godfrey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:21:41pm

My high school chemistry professor was a Christian Brother. There was no time to indulge any religious angle. He had his hands full trying to explain p-orbitals to a class full of boys hopped up on testosterone. We weren't looking for Ultimate Answers, but out the window.

298 infidel4ever  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:21:45pm

re: #264 ciaospirit

From your link and parents better pay attention.

And not only in the States either.

In the Netherlands we are facing a concerted effort by one of our Prada-Muslims to get Islam taught in all Dutch public schools. According to him and his minions it would be so much better if Muslim children were not taught the Koran in tiny back rooms by Koran teachers who teach them to hate democracy and make them become radicalized. And of course our children would also benefit from learning about Islam (!).
O yes, those poor Muslim children are also being beaten, sometimes with a ruler...

Boohoohoo, cry me a river... Makes you wonder where the parents are...

299 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:22:01pm

re: #295 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

ID is not science.

300 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:22:22pm

re: #244 Shug

Spock, your Human side is showing you damned half breed.

/bones

lol... =)

301 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:22:34pm

re: #199 mama winger

But is was included as one sign of mania. I disagree. That's all.

To clarify, I wouldn't consider placing a Bible on a desk, in and of itself, to be a sign of religious mania.

However, I would ask why the person considered it necessary to do so, if he continued to do it after his boss in a secular workplace told him to stop.

If his boss told him to stop, and if no religious texts were permitted on any teacher's desk, I would expect the teacher to comply.

If the teacher refused to comply, I would ask what he thought he was accomplishing by insisting on displaying an outward sign of piety. Could he not place the Bible inside his desk drawer when not in use and let his life be a witness instead?

From an article dated 18 April 2008:

The Columbus Dispatch

"...On Monday, Middle School Principal William D. White told Freshwater to remove 'all religious items' from his classroom by the end of Wednesday.

"Freshwater agreed to take down the Ten Commandments from the door of his classroom, posters with Bible verses and Bibles on a shelf. But he refused to remove his personal Bible from his desk when students are in the room.

“'That Bible is me. I want my Bible on my desk because that is me,' he said yesterday. The case has drawn national media attention...

"But it's not just about the Bible on the desk. Freshwater, 51, has been at odds with the school administration on other occasions because he put God into his explanation of how the world began...

"In 2006, he was instructed to remove from his curriculum a handout titled 'Darwin's Theory of Evolution — The Premise and the Problem.' A parent had questioned its validity and use in a science classroom.

"The superintendent said it had 'not passed the test of scientific review and acceptance of the established scientific community.'”

302 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:22:50pm

re: #293 wolfie

I start mine in 6 th grade.....go through a 3-yr sequence of basic formal logic and informal fallacies. We figure that kids that age are all little petti-foggers and rationalizers anyway, so we might as well teach them good arguing.

Needless to say, we often have to resort to an obscure fallacy called the argument ad baculam.....the appeal to power or brute force.

I also think Critical Thinking should be taught, as well.

303 David IV of Georgia  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:23:00pm

I haven't read all the comments as I just got back from church.

Freshwater's behavior is not suitable for school. While some of what he did might be more appropriate for Sunday school, marking a student clearly crosses a line.

His antics [to use a euphemism] didn't help or promote his causes, but hurt them:

For when the heathen hear from our mouth the oracles of God, they wonder at their beauty and greatness; afterwards, when they find out that our deeds are unworthy of the words which we speak, they turn from wonder to blasphemy, saying that it is a myth and a delusion.
II Clement XIII: 3. The Apostolic Fathers. Kirsopp Lake, trans. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard: Cambridge, 1998.

304 Gordon Marock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:24:08pm

re: #295 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Well, I think the jackass should have been fired! He's clearly a psycho!

As to the whole to teach or not to teach thing...I think both THEORIES should be taught. Just like the THEORY of Relativity is taught, the THEORY of Evolution, etc, etc.

And they should be taught as THEORY, because that's what they are. ID is a theory in some circles, just as Evolution is called the Theory of Evolution. Both should be taught in a secular manner...some believe or theorize...yada yada yada.

I also believe that the Bible can be used in literature classes, just as (dare I say it) the Koran...they are both works of literature.

The place that one gets hung up on is...wait for it...political or religious agenda. Of course, an involved parent can sway their child toward the direction they desire the child to go in...we do it as parents anyway.

This illustrates the slippery slope. All theories ARE NOT EQUAL. Science theories must pass tests using the scientific method until they are disproven or displaced by a more correct theory. If ID is allowed in, then no one can argue against any crackpot 'theory' in the future.

305 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:24:15pm

re: #294 MrSpock

Hey, no problem. Live long and prosper.

306 IslandLibertarian  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:24:46pm

My opinions, Part 7a.
Teachers should not teach ANY religion in a Public Classroom. (That's what private schools are for.) But HISTORY & LITERATURE should be covered in depth.

And Australian Shepherds are the best damned dogs on earth!

Now let's all go out and play.

307 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:25:16pm

re: #281 gman

John Dewey's effect on schools still lingers. Socialization of children is still a large part of the emphasis in schools. I think a school's role should be to prepare students for life as an adult. That means students come to school, learn skills that the business world requires, and go home. Sorry to be a party pooper, but school carnivals, birthday parties, crazy hair days, cheerleaders, and sports teams all have no business at school. Teachers should also not be taking on the role of parents. Discipline needs to be handled by parents, not by the school. Teachers have no business indoctrinating students with self- esteem babble or whatever the current mantra on sex education might be. Leave that to parents. Sounds radical, but the focus needs to be brought back to academics and not socialization. We need adults in society who can think critically and not ones who think they are entitled to more social benefits at taxpayers' expense

308 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:25:29pm

re: #295 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

And they should be taught as THEORY, because that's what they are. ID is a theory in some circles, just as Evolution is called the Theory of Evolution.

No, you're misunderstanding the meaning of a "scientific theory." We've gone over and over this definition in these threads, but I keep seeing the misconception pop up again.

"Intelligent design" is not a scientific theory.

In scientific usage, a theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it can in everyday speech. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. It originates from or is supported by experimental evidence (see scientific method). In this sense, a theory is a systematic and formalized expression of all previous observations, and is predictive, logical, and testable. In principle, scientific theories are always tentative, and subject to corrections, inclusion in a yet wider theory, or succession. Commonly, many more specific hypotheses may be logically bound together by just one or two theories. As a rule for use of the term, theories tend to deal with much broader sets of universals than do hypotheses, which ordinarily deal with much more specific sets of phenomena or specific applications of a theory.

Of several competing theories, one theory may be superior to another in terms of its approximation of reality. Scientific tests of the quality of a theory include its conformity to known facts and its ability to generate hypotheses with outcomes that would predict further testable facts.

A difference in usage of the word "fact" contributes to confusion in regard to the meaning of "theory." An appreciation of the various meanings of "fact" and "knowledge" can help to clarify an understanding of the meanings of "theory."

309 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:26:56pm

re: #299 Sharmuta

ID is not science.

But turtles are.......
Just as soon as I can design the experiment and get a federal grant.

310 godfrey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:27:05pm

These days, "critical thinking" is just code for "leftist indoctrination," whereby lefty teachers seek to replace inherited ideology with a different set of prejudices. I've seen it on the other political side, too.

This isn't teaching "thinking." Thinking is logic, and I'm with Mama Winger: logic should be taught early and often. Instill the right habits of thought -- not the thoughts themselves.

Problem is, so few teachers these days have any serious training in logic, formal or informal. The job usually falls to composition teachers, who pull out their "logical fallacies" sheet one day and consider their duty discharged.

I don't fault them. The system sucks. Re-do it.

311 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:27:44pm

re: #296 LeePro

Geeze- and I apologized for that.

312 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:28:01pm

re: #309 JCM

But turtles are.......
Just as soon as I can design the experiment and get a federal grant.

Dr. Seuss pretty much has you beat out on turtle-stacking research.

313 NonNativeTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:28:21pm

#re LeePro
Thanks,
and I "up-dinged" ya

314 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:28:27pm

re: #299 Sharmuta

ID is not science.


Well, one could argue that Evolution isn't either...I mean, and this is just for the sake of argument (I have my own opinions on the subject) one asks...what was there before the little speck of dust that made the big bang which started all life (theoritically) and where did that little speck of dust come from? What made it go bang?

Same argument for God...how did God happen? What was there before God popped into existance and what caussed God to pop into existance?

I don't think that evolution or ID should be taught in science anyway..I just don't know where it should be taught

315 Da_Beerfreak  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:28:48pm

re: #178 moonstone

Good links, thanks.

So basically I was mistaken about the entire concept of Intelligent Design. I had no idea it was so politicized. I must admit, it makes me feel a lot better about those of you who go ballistic (including Charles) whenever ID is mentioned! I should never have doubted the lizard master.

I guess there isn't a label for us "people who are fine with both science and religion." I'll just be thankful that no one is forcing us to choose between them.

There is a label, we're called normal.

316 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:28:59pm

re: #257 Hard Right

It seems you and I are of the same mind.

My explanation was for that teacher and those just like him. I've come accross a few of them in my life and they make it that black and white.

Yes, you're right. It's unfortunate they see it that way.

317 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:29:08pm

re: #197 Luigi

Peru is facing record cold temperatures.

[Link: gatewaypundit.blogspot.com...]

Maybe because it's WINTER in the southern hemisphere?

318 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:29:24pm

re: #312 OldLineTexan

Dr. Seuss pretty much has you beat out on turtle-stacking research.

Addendum:
But maybe you could figure out how Obama got up on tht post.

319 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:29:38pm

re: #314 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Evolution IS science.

320 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:29:43pm

re: #310 godfrey

These days, "critical thinking" is just code for "leftist indoctrination," whereby lefty teachers seek to replace inherited ideology with a different set of prejudices. I've seen it on the other political side, too.

This isn't teaching "thinking." Thinking is logic, and I'm with Mama Winger: logic should be taught early and often. Instill the right habits of thought -- not the thoughts themselves.

Problem is, so few teachers these days have any serious training in logic, formal or informal. The job usually falls to composition teachers, who pull out their "logical fallacies" sheet one day and consider their duty discharged.

I don't fault them. The system sucks. Re-do it.

Teachers now don't have training in anything. They go to college to learn how to teach, rather than have a degree in a real subject such as science, math, Lit, History, Spanish, etc. It is a real problem.

321 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:31:10pm

re: #283 tokyobk

Excellent point.

322 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:31:27pm

re: #310 godfrey

These days, "critical thinking" is just code for "leftist indoctrination," whereby lefty teachers seek to replace inherited ideology with a different set of prejudices. I've seen it on the other political side, too.

This isn't teaching "thinking." Thinking is logic, and I'm with Mama Winger: logic should be taught early and often. Instill the right habits of thought -- not the thoughts themselves.

Problem is, so few teachers these days have any serious training in logic, formal or informal. The job usually falls to composition teachers, who pull out their "logical fallacies" sheet one day and consider their duty discharged.

I don't fault them. The system sucks. Re-do it.

I have to agree with you. Sadly, most kids don't WANT to think--they want the answer.

When I each them grammar and how to analyze a sentence, they HAVE to think.

I also teach a 9-week elective for gifted students on how to play bridge. Believe me, bridge insists that you think critically!

323 mfarmer1  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:31:32pm

re: #280 MrSpock

I wasn't defending this guy in any way... He's obviously got some issues and should not be using the classroom as a podium for his personal beliefs, much less branding a student with a cross.

My comments were about my perception that there is a lot of religious antagonism going on here directed at Christians, especially those who believe in ID...

Guilty as charged. Of course, if you're ok with people who believe humans dined on Brontosaurus burgers back in the day, what can I say?

324 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:31:51pm

re: #317 LeePro

Maybe because it's WINTER in the southern hemisphere?

I think you're on to something! Our coldest temperatures here tend to happen in winter...hmmm...maybe I could come up with a theory based on observation and test it for a while.

This is gonna mean some big research $...you taxpayers start digging in your wallets.

325 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:31:59pm

re: #303 David IV of Georgia

I haven't read all the comments as I just got back from church.

Freshwater's behavior is not suitable for school While some of what he did might be more appropriate for Sunday school, marking a student clearly crosses a line.

His antics [to use a euphemism] didn't help or promote his causes, but hurt them:

so where would it be OK to burn a cross into somebody ?

None of what he did was appropriate for school. He is paid to teach science

326 godfrey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:32:34pm

re: #320 pat

That's not true in every state. A few years ago, Louisiana passed a set of comprehensive teacher education reforms. To teach secondary school, you now need a bachelor's degree in the discipline you'll teach (history, math, english, etc.). Plus courses in pedagogy, policy, etc.

Every state should have something similar.

A lot of education coursework is, of course, dreck and should be scrapped. But you're using too broad a brush.

327 godfrey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:33:51pm

re: #322 goddessoftheclassroom

GOTC, if you're teaching Bridge to kids, you are AWESOME. Period.

328 pat  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:33:59pm

re: #326 godfrey

Good for them. The teachers union runs my State and they are pernicious.

329 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:34:13pm

re: #323 mfarmer1

Guilty as charged. Of course, if you're ok with people who believe humans dined on Brontosaurus burgers back in the day, what can I say?


Crikey. Who said that? Here? Really?

I have never heard that belief espoused outside of a Flintstones cartoon, personally.

Wow.

330 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:34:27pm

re: #320 pat

Teachers now don't have training in anything. They go to college to learn how to teach, rather than have a degree in a real subject such as science, math, Lit, History, Spanish, etc. It is a real problem.

This video will give some insight into the "math" the do "teach."

331 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:34:37pm

re: #326 godfrey

That's not true in every state. A few years ago, Louisiana passed a set of comprehensive teacher education reforms. To teach secondary school, you now need a bachelor's degree in the discipline you'll teach (history, math, english, etc.). Plus courses in pedagogy, policy, etc.

Every state should have something similar.

A lot of education coursework is, of course, dreck and should be scrapped. But you're using too broad a brush.

I agree, but then I do have a BA in English (plus some!)

332 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:34:38pm

re: #314 The Pulchritudinous Patriot


where did that little speck of dust come from? What made it go bang?


You should read up on the Big Bang theory. It's fascinating.

333 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:34:41pm

re: #317 LeePro

Maybe because it's WINTER in the southern hemisphere?


ROFL!

334 Racer X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:34:45pm

Hot Dog it is hot outside! Was up to 110 a little while ago. 105 now.

I sure hope more people buy Hybrids so it cools down some.

335 godfrey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:35:04pm

re: #328 pat

Those teacher unions need to be destroyed. They have far, far outlived their usefulness, and are now major obstacles planted firmly in the way of progress and learning.

336 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:35:47pm

re: #334 Racer X

Hot Dog it is hot outside! Was up to 110 a little while ago. 105 now.

I sure hope more people buy Hybrids so it cools down some.

Won't work. Smug will kill us.

/South Park episode

337 Da_Beerfreak  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:35:47pm

re: #190 FrogMarch

Global Warming is a scam.... pass it on...


(meanwhile, leftists ignore China's toxic industrial waste)
/It isn't the CO2, stupid.

The problem is NOT carbon,
it's the stupid Congress!

338 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:35:59pm

re: #327 godfrey

GOTC, if you're teaching Bridge to kids, you are AWESOME. Period.

You are so kind!

We meet just twice a week, but at the end we meet for an all-afternoon bridge party.

339 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:36:30pm

re: #335 godfrey

Those teacher unions need to be destroyed. They have far, far outlived their usefulness, and are now major obstacles planted firmly in the way of progress and learning.


Teachers unions are nothing more than a tool for promulgating the leftist agenda.

340 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:36:31pm

re: #225 Thanos

I haven't taken her swimming yet, she's only six months old, but it's a great idea and I'll try it out.

Infants can learn to swim!

341 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:36:48pm

re: #338 goddessoftheclassroom

You are so kind!

We meet just twice a week, but at the end we meet for an all-afternoon bridge party.

I confess I'm in awe of you as well.

I made it as far as canasta.

342 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:37:21pm

re: #332 Killgore Trout

You should read up on the Big Bang theory. It's fascinating.


I have, thanks...:)

343 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:37:24pm

re: #339 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Teachers unions are nothing more than a tool for promulgating the leftist agenda.

Not on the local level. Nationally and to a great extent state-wide, I agree with you.

344 Indefatigable  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:37:56pm

Can anyone give me some good reading on evolution? As a man serious about his faith, in previous years I took evolution to be just some sneaky way of not acknowledging God. However, recently I have come to realize that this view is in error and wish to explore evolution more seriously.

345 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:38:52pm

re: #344 Indefatigable

I'm currently reading this book, and maybe it will help you:

Saving Darwin: How to Be a Christian and Believe in Evolution

346 JHW  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:39:59pm

I'm going to post this site in both the spinoff links and here, it's the best comprehensive site I've seen on evolution, and almost could amount to a course on the subject with literally dozens of modules or topics, also has a resource for teachers, with lesson plans. Says it's suitable for K-16.
Religion is not discussed in any form, so I don't see how it could offend anyone.
Univ. of California Understanding Evolution

347 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:40:17pm

re: #343 goddessoftheclassroom

Not on the local level. Nationally and to a great extent state-wide, I agree with you.

WEA in WA state is. A lot of teacher's have been in a long fight to assert their Becker Rights. Getting comprehensive financial statements from WEA, and to be able to pay only for collective bargaining.

348 debutaunt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:40:55pm

re: #291 Cognito

Nut.

Mounds.

349 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:41:15pm

re: #340 LeePro

Infants can learn to swim!

Shit! You're talking about a DOG! ! !

What I get for being so far behind!

350 opnion  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:41:39pm

re: #160 mama winger

Mama Winger, congratulations. I knew that the Cubs have a good club.
They are actually better than I thought.
Ozzie managed really bad the last couple of days.
It is not over. It wasn't over when the Gremans bombed Pearl Harbor.
Four more games.

351 NonNativeTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:42:23pm

re: #344 Indefatigable

Can anyone give me some good reading on evolution? As a man serious about his faith, in previous years I took evolution to be just some sneaky way of not acknowledging God. However, recently I have come to realize that this view is in error and wish to explore evolution more seriously.

I really like
The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom (Paperback)
by Gerald L. Schroeder

352 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:42:38pm

re: #308 Charles


Thank you, Charles.

And just because I feel like tweeking you , in a respectful way of course, wouldn't it be funny if God did create us and then tossed a bunch of fossils, sedimentary deposits and thinking humans into the mix...just to see what they'd come up with?

I'm not teasing you, nor am I being disrespectful...I just have an odd sense of humor.

Besides, this argument is really facinating from a purely psychological POV. Just look at the way some work themselves into a lather...like the subject of this thread.

353 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:42:42pm

re: #349 LeePro

Shit! You're talking about a DOG! ! !

What I get for being so far behind!

It's still a good Bill Cosby routine. I was just trying to find it to link, but no luck.

354 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:44:05pm

re: #347 JCM

WEA in WA state is. A lot of teacher's have been in a long fight to assert their Becker Rights. Getting comprehensive financial statements from WEA, and to be able to pay only for collective bargaining.

OH, I see. Allow me, please, to amend my comment "Not ALWAYS on the local level."

One of the many great things about LGF is how much I learn to appreciate what a great District I have--I took it for granted that everywhere was like mine.

355 ladycatnip  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:44:20pm

#184 gopninja

re: #180 Sharmuta

Could you imagine an algebra teacher branding the quadratic formula into a student's arm?

I wish my teacher had done that!

I was taught the quadratic formula to the tune of Pop Goes the Weasel, and boy did that come in handy for tests. Impossible to forget, so I taught it to my kids when they were in high school.

x is equal to negative b, plus or minus the square root, of b squared minus 4 times ac, all divided by 2a

Sorry...it's been a long Saturday, I'm bored...

356 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:44:36pm

There is going to be some devolution, because this utterly ignorant individual (burn a student? WTF?) is going to be sued into the Stone Age.

/Wahabists will be modern compared to him!

357 debutaunt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:45:22pm

re: #314 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

It's being taught right here.

358 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:45:23pm

re: #254 Sharmuta

We're cool.

;D

359 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:46:12pm

re: #355 ladycatnip

#184 gopninja

Sorry...it's been a long Saturday, I'm bored...

I teach a list of prepositions to the tune "Yankee Doodle" and subordinating conjunctions to "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star." I have more crazy ways of remembering things...

360 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:46:34pm

re: #322 goddessoftheclassroom

I have to agree with you. Sadly, most kids don't WANT to think--they want the answer.

When I each them grammar and how to analyze a sentence, they HAVE to think.

I also teach a 9-week elective for gifted students on how to play bridge. Believe me, bridge insists that you think critically!


Would that we had more teachers like you........and more districts that would actually allow someone like you to teach something.
My kids all know how to diagram sentences. But when a friend of mine tried to teach kids to do it in the public schools, the dept head forbade her.

361 infidel Alan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:46:39pm

There is an elderly German lady, named Ursula, in our neighborhood who was an Olympic swimmer and she teaches the local infants to swim by tossing them into the water and letting them dogpaddle to her. They're crying like mad and she's yelling "Swim, Swim, Swim." It's really scary the first time you see her in action.

362 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:46:53pm

re: #354 goddessoftheclassroom

OH, I see. Allow me, please, to amend my comment "Not ALWAYS on the local level."

One of the many great things about LGF is how much I learn to appreciate what a great District I have--I took it for granted that everywhere was like mine.

LOL! We have a bunch of great teachers in WA fighting the good fight. I think the activist few have taken over the WEA, and most teachers are too busy teaching, and living.

363 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:47:04pm

re: #359 goddessoftheclassroom

I teach a list of prepositions to the tune "Yankee Doodle" and subordinating conjunctions to "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star." I have more crazy ways of remembering things...

I was just thrilled to pass Algebra.

Oddly...I did great in Geometry.

364 David IV of Georgia  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:48:01pm

re: #306 IslandLibertarian

My opinions, Part 7a.
Teachers should not teach ANY religion in a Public Classroom. (That's what private schools are for.) But HISTORY & LITERATURE should be covered in depth.

And Australian Shepherds are the best damned dogs on earth!

Now let's all go out and play.

I think that in a general sense briefly covering some of the basic premises of various religions is permissible for school when, for example, they help explain motivations for people's actions in history: jihad, crusades, witch-burning, etc.
Critical thinking, logic, and the awareness that what is read and taught may be false or misleading should be taught. (Thankfully, I had some teachers that did this.)
Indoctrination or coercion of any form as pertaining to religion should not be allowed in public classrooms.

365 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:48:09pm

re: #361 infidel Alan

There is an elderly German lady, named Ursula, in our neighborhood who was an Olympic swimmer and she teaches the local infants to swim by tossing them into the water and letting them dogpaddle to her. They're crying like mad and she's yelling "Swim, Swim, Swim." It's really scary the first time you see her in action.


Oh my god! I think I'd faint.

366 debutaunt  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:48:26pm

re: #332 Killgore Trout

You should read up on the Big Bang theory. It's fascinating.

Was C-4 involved?

367 proud to be an infidel  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:49:02pm

re: #33 Sharmuta

Yeah- next thing you know, I'll quote the koran or some such madness.

Quoting the koran? Madness? What do you mean? That's perfectly acceptable in American schools nowdays. Didn't you know? America is a multicultural society. So get with the program fella! (um.....or lady)

368 opnion  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:49:44pm

re: #363 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I was just thrilled to pass Algebra.

Oddly...I did great in Geometry.


I aolways thought that Algebra & Geometry are realkly different disciplines.
Algebra is a way to think. Geometry is logic. It is kind of like syllogisms.

369 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:49:49pm

re: #339 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Teachers unions are nothing more than a tool for promulgating the leftist agenda.

Aw, I don't think that's entirely fair. Every now and then they want lotsa jobs and money, too! :)

370 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:50:18pm

re: #363 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I was just thrilled to pass Algebra.

Oddly...I did great in Geometry.

I was stymied by algebra for the longest time. I simply could not comprehend all of sudden how math was done with letters, it made no sense, a letter has no numerical value.

It wasn't till I took remedial algebra at the Community College a instructor explained it, something that never had been done for me.

371 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:50:42pm

re: #360 wolfie

Would that we had more teachers like you........and more districts that would actually allow someone like you to teach something.
My kids all know how to diagram sentences. But when a friend of mine tried to teach kids to do it in the public schools, the dept head forbade her.

WHAT? She was FORBIDDEN? Oh, dear Lord.

I teach grammar along with writing, but the sentence is the basis building block of an essay, and students have to understand how our language works.

The very first lesson I teach is that English is based on word order, called syntax. Without understanding that, nothing else makes sense.

372 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:50:47pm

re: #368 opnion

I aolways thought that Algebra & Geometry are realkly different disciplines.
Algebra is a way to think. Geometry is logic. It is kind of like syllogisms.

I hated Algebra...Geometry just made more sense to me.

373 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:51:17pm

re: #366 debutaunt

Was C-4 involved?

Nah!
Tsar bomb.

374 David IV of Georgia  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:51:51pm
re: #325 Shug 6/21/08 4:31:59 pm

re: #303 David IV of Georgia

I haven't read all the comments as I just got back from church.

Freshwater's behavior is not suitable for school While some of what he did might be more appropriate for Sunday school,

marking a student clearly crosses a line.

His antics [to use a euphemism] didn't help or promote his causes, but hurt them:

so where would it be OK to burn a cross into somebody ?

None of what he did was appropriate for school. He is paid to teach science

You might want to read what I said before you comment about what I said.

375 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:51:58pm

re: #370 JCM

I was stymied by algebra for the longest time. I simply could not comprehend all of sudden how math was done with letters, it made no sense, a letter has no numerical value.

It wasn't till I took remedial algebra at the Community College a instructor explained it, something that never had been done for me.


Funny that you mention remedial algebra...I'm going back to school to finish the undergrad and shockingly enough...I need to do a remedial algebra course.

Lord, I hope it's easier to understand now.

376 opnion  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:52:29pm

re: #372 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I hated Algebra...Geometry just made more sense to me.

377 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:52:34pm

re: #374 David IV of Georgia

I did read what you said and I stand by what I said.

378 Indefatigable  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:53:53pm

re: #320 pat

I have to admit I've had problems with this, too, especially since I've known people in college who majored in Education to be teachers. I've always felt that one should get a degree in a subject or related material (Chem degree, but teaching mathematics should be acceptable) and take supplemental classes in teaching to know learn "how" to teach and address classroom issues.

379 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:54:03pm

Well, the 7 yo daughter is looking at me and her eyes are saying play with me or I'm gonna be really hurt since I haven't seen you in a week.

So, I'm gonna go play.

BBL

380 The Pulchritudinous Patriot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:54:22pm

re: #376 opnion

Huh?

381 Albertanator  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:55:09pm

So Charles...you kind of acting like the Left here...you take an extreme example and tar all of us 'intolerant' christians with the same brush!?

Uh...yeah...Homosexuality is wrong...tell me...are you tolerant towards ex gays by any chance? Are you aware 10's of thousands of Americans are ex gays and through their own desire and the Creator's help, they have left this 'alternative' lifestyle.

I suggest homo behavior should not be indoctrinated to our kids...you cannot have it both ways Charles...your being awfully short sighted here Charles....

You seem to want to make LGF for those that are only left wing libertarians.......you seem to be getting increasingly radical and I do not mean that in a good way!

382 abolitionist  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:55:19pm

re: #330 JCM

This video will give some insight into the "math" the do "teach."

I saw that months ago -- very good info. Current teaching methods -- sick.

383 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:55:26pm

Common cooking spice shows promise in combating diabetes and obesity

Shown to reverse inflammation associated with obesity and improves blood sugar control
Turmeric, an Asian spice found in many curries, has a long history of use in reducing inflammation, healing wounds and relieving pain, but can it prevent diabetes? Since inflammation plays a big role in many diseases and is believed to be involved in onset of both obesity and Type 2 diabetes, Drew Tortoriello, M.D., an endocrinologist and research scientist at the Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center at Columbia University Medical Center, and his colleagues were curious what effect the herb might have on diabetic mice.

More curry!

384 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:55:29pm

re: #375 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Funny that you mention remedial algebra...I'm going back to school to finish the undergrad and shockingly enough...I need to do a remedial algebra course.

Lord, I hope it's easier to understand now.

Here's a little-known fact: brains development at different rates in different skills.

I was an "advanced" student verbally but NOT mathematically. For the social status I was in advanced math classes, but I had to work very hard and felt so lost--until I was 15. Then the "math" parts of my brain caught up with the word part and it suddenly made sense. Sadly, I was so sick of the struggle that I stopped taking math after 10th grade.

I bet you'll do GREAT in your math class now.

385 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:55:42pm

re: #375 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Funny that you mention remedial algebra...I'm going back to school to finish the undergrad and shockingly enough...I need to do a remedial algebra course.

Lord, I hope it's easier to understand now.

It was actually quite simple. I don't recall a single HS math teacher every saying, the letters are generic place holders, the numbers will be plugged in later when we have a specific problem to solve. They just started off algebra with the rules, using letters, no explanation of where the numbers went.

The best advice I got from that instructor, "you never understand a math class until you are two classes beyond it."

386 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:56:14pm

re: #367 proud to be an infidel

I once got called a hater for quoting the koran. It's become a running joke in the lounge with other Lizards like Distant Thunder.

387 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:56:25pm

re: #381 Albertanator

Dude.

388 Albertanator  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:56:30pm

And yes...the Darwinists have more then their fair share of nuts and nazis too....Check out PZ Myers....

Two can play this game Charles!

389 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:56:37pm

re: #378 Indefatigable

I have to admit I've had problems with this, too, especially since I've known people in college who majored in Education to be teachers. I've always felt that one should get a degree in a subject or related material (Chem degree, but teaching mathematics should be acceptable) and take supplemental classes in teaching to know learn "how" to teach and address classroom issues.

What really upsets me is that English teachers do not have to have a class in teaching grammer.

390 opnion  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:57:01pm

re: #380 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Huh?


It posted before, I could answer you.
I am in agreement. Geometry is logical & I always thought that it was fun.

391 Indefatigable  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:57:30pm

re: #381 Albertanator

Did I miss something? At what point was what you're talking about the subject of the thread?

392 Reno911  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:57:39pm

It's business time...

393 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:58:24pm

Ooh kay.

394 LeePro  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:58:50pm

re: #334 Racer X

Hot Dog it is hot outside! Was up to 110 a little while ago. 105 now.

I sure hope more people buy Hybrids so it cools down some.

Add about a 80-90% humidity to that and you've got the south for at least 5 months a year!

;)

395 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:59:38pm

re: #381 Albertanator

Project much?

396 David IV of Georgia  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 4:59:54pm

re: #377 Shug

I did read what you said and I stand by what I said.

I think he is not only open civil suit/punishment but could be also criminally liable for what he did.

When I said, "Freshwater's behavior is not suitable for school", you were confused? He should be fired. Probably sued. And thrown in jail.

His job is to teach science but he decided he's too smart for that.

397 infidel Alan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:00:13pm

re: #339 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

Teachers unions are nothing more than a tool for promulgating the leftist agenda.

Unfortunately, teachers unions are necessary at the local level to act as a check on the dictatorial impulses of school administrators (who constitute a little American nomenklatura) and to defend teachers' rights in the workplace. At the national and state levels they have been subverted by "progressive" activists--like most American organizations that practice democracy (including, for example, the United Methodist Church).

398 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:00:14pm

re: #387 Killgore Trout

Dude.

Where's Mandy, I just don't have her style.

399 gettinby  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:00:19pm

re: #372 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I hated Algebra...Geometry just made more sense to me.

Yes!

/me, too.

Also, for some strange reason, English always made sense to me. Until I moved to Florida 18 years ago...now I find myself using ain't, fixin'to and hey (instead of hello) without questioning myself.

/ashamed. :(

Oh...and gettin' by

LOL

400 freetoken  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:00:26pm

re: #381 Albertanator

You seem to want to make LGF for those that are only left wing libertarians.......you seem to be getting increasingly radical and I do not mean that in a good way!

Before long he will be hanging peace symbols around his neck, driving a VW bus, and be putting images of Al Gore on his website.... oh, the travesty of it all...

401 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:00:54pm

re: #368 opnion

I aolways thought that Algebra & Geometry are realkly different disciplines.
Algebra is a way to think. Geometry is logic. It is kind of like syllogisms.

Fads in math come and go, but right now geometry books have very little on geometric proofs. In my day (ahem!) proofs comprised at least half of the subject. Today it's maybe 10%, depending on the text.
While teaching my kids logic, I wanted to use plane geometry. I had to find old texts from the early sixties to get the really good stuff.

402 Albertanator  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:01:11pm

#387

This website , which has been in the past for the exposing of dangers of Islam and the Loony left seems to be taking a nasty nasty turn lately..

So...Dude right back at you....

Believe it or not....it isn't healthly for a nation to practice every hedonist impulse in the books....ie Gay Marriage and so on and so forth...

We have to have a balance.....and we are tragically rotting from the inside....which makes it much much easier for Islam to takeover...not to mention the lunatic left!

403 Shug  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:01:36pm

re: #396 David IV of Georgia

my take on your original comment was that his behavior would be appropriate in a non-school venue. I know now that's not what you meant. thanks for the clarification

404 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:02:23pm

re: #402 Albertanator

Do you have a Ron Paul sign in your yard?

405 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:02:25pm

re: #402 Albertanator

I'd much rather defend my country from people like you while I'm at it.

406 Da_Beerfreak  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:02:35pm

re: #281 gman

John Dewey's effect on schools still lingers. Socialization of children is still a large part of the emphasis in schools. I think a school's role should be to prepare students for life as an adult. That means students come to school, learn skills that the business world requires, and go home. Sorry to be a party pooper, but school carnivals, birthday parties, crazy hair days, cheerleaders, and sports teams all have no business at school. Teachers should also not be taking on the role of parents. Discipline needs to be handled by parents, not by the school. Teachers have no business indoctrinating students with self- esteem babble or whatever the current mantra on sex education might be. Leave that to parents. Sounds radical, but the focus needs to be brought back to academics and not socialization. We need adults in society who can think critically and not ones who think they are entitled to more social benefits at taxpayers' expense

But if all that were to really happen, who would be left to vote for the DemonRats?

407 Indefatigable  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:03:01pm

re: #402 Albertanator

Okay, but what does that have to do with the thread? Explain. I'd love to hear it.

408 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:03:01pm

re: #402 Albertanator

So teachers abusing students is okay?

409 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:03:20pm

Rev Phelps has a sock puppet!

410 WhiteRasta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:03:24pm

re: #381 Albertanator

It's rude to be rude to the host of this website.

Go elsewhere, if you don't like it here.

Disagree if you want, hold off on the rudeness.

411 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:03:45pm

Oh woe is us, we are all doomed because some people don't live the way I wish them to and we must do something.

/the basic principle behind extremists in any millieu, on any issue. Change the subject, stir up hate by singling out some group...

412 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:04:16pm

re: #402 Albertanator

And teachers teaching religion in a public school is okay?

413 Gordon Marock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:05:02pm

re: #388 Albertanator

And yes...the Darwinists have more then their fair share of nuts and nazis too....Check out PZ Myers....

Two can play this game Charles!

It's not the same game because you are wrong and we are right, isn' that right, we?

414 vxbush  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:05:31pm

re: #355 ladycatnip

I was taught the quadratic formula to the tune of Pop Goes the Weasel, and boy did that come in handy for tests. Impossible to forget, so I taught it to my kids when they were in high school.

Ha! That's delightful, and I've never heard of that. But it works.

415 vxbush  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:06:03pm

re: #359 goddessoftheclassroom

I teach a list of prepositions to the tune "Yankee Doodle" and subordinating conjunctions to "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star." I have more crazy ways of remembering things...

I had a teacher who had a little song to help us keep track of all the helping verbs. I can only remember snatches of it now.

416 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:06:16pm

re: #399 gettinby

Yes!

/me, too.

Also, for some strange reason, English always made sense to me. Until I moved to Florida 18 years ago...now I find myself using ain't, fixin'to and hey (instead of hello) without questioning myself.

/ashamed. :(

Oh...and gettin' by

LOL

Hey, gettinby, ain't you fixin' to be on LGF for a while?
:)

I still say "y'all" as a contraction of "you all," and I also use "reckon." When my students tease me, I put on my very best Virginia drawl and say, "You Yankees just don't know how to talke."

417 mossley  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:07:12pm

re: #402 Albertanator

#387

This website , which has been in the past for the exposing of dangers of Islam and the Loony left seems to be taking a nasty nasty turn lately...


Actually, this is a private site run by Charles. He can post whatever the hell interests him. Usually, it involves actual facts. No one is forcing you to stay if you don't like reading facts.

418 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:07:51pm

re: #397 infidel Alan

Good point.
The teachers themselves have more power at the local level. But a lot of the rot seeps down.
I have often thought that teachers should form unions that are district-based and independent.

419 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:08:41pm

I'm curious to see how far this one will go.

420 ladycatnip  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:09:07pm

#359 goddessoftheclassroom

I teach a list of prepositions to the tune "Yankee Doodle" and subordinating conjunctions to "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star." I have more crazy ways of remembering things...

Now that's teaching! Those "crazy ways of remembering things" are that hand reaching down to struggling students, pulling them up to the top. Your students much love you!

#376 opinion

re: #372 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

I hated Algebra...Geometry just made more sense to me.

I was told that it's an either or - either you're good at algebra or geometry. Not both. I'm an algebra lover because it makes sense to me; did horrible in the theorems and proofs section of geometry in high school - not to mention our teacher sucked. Plus I was a New Math experiment in the early Sixties, which they now know failed miserably.

421 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:09:12pm

re: #406 Da_Beerfreak

But if all that were to really happen, who would be left to vote for the DemonRats?

Great point. The Demon Rats are going to kick and scratch to prevent change, but I think schools are inching their way in the right direction. At least they are being asked presently to have some form of accountability whereas in the past it was anything goes.

422 gettinby  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:10:43pm

re: #416 goddessoftheclassroom

Hey, gettinby, ain't you fixin' to be on LGF for a while?
:)

I still say "y'all" as a contraction of "you all," and I also use "reckon." When my students tease me, I put on my very best Virginia drawl and say, "You Yankees just don't know how to talke."

And I find it all extremely delightful and heartwarming when locals of any flavor use their own tongue.

Besides...y'all just makes ...well, sense!

Bottom line (imho) though, is that teachers should use and teach the correct English. The locals can work it out later!

423 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:12:34pm

re: #402 Albertanator

Are you hitting on me?

424 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:14:40pm

There heeeeerreeee.

425 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:15:30pm

Two posts in a row that I cannot understand.

I must be drunk.

Schweeeet!

426 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:16:02pm
re: #134 wolfie
re: #80 Kulhwch
Freshwater, according to an independent report, used an electrostatic device to mark a cross on the arm of one of his students, causing pain to the student the night of the incident and leaving a mark that lasted for approximately three weeks.

What a monster. How typical of the IDiot Fundii. They're lucky they're only being sued. If Mr. Secretly-Afraid-I'm-Gay had laid one hand on a child of mine, I'd've done my best to send him home to Jesus a tad early.

}:) [What a maroon!]

I serioisly doubt it's typical of ID believers, Protestants, Christians, Yankees, Americans, humans, or primates.

Me too, which is why I didn't mention them.  But the fundamentalist is another topic entirely.  I'm all too familiar with forced conversions, the rack, the strappado, burning of heretics, stoning of people not of your faith, beheadings, pressing to death of suspected witches, hundreds of years of holy jihad, thumbscrews, the pear, hot iron chair, every small torture or isolation on up to genocide practiced by fundamentalists.  After all, we see a lot of that in the stories here and on other antijihadi sites, don't we?

}:)     [The preponderance of the evidence backs me up.]

427 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:16:05pm

re: #424 Sharmuta

There heeeeerreeee.

Lol
Heeeeeeeere's Johnnnnnnnnny!

Red Rum
Red Rum

428 InternationalObserver  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:16:11pm

I don't understand something. I thought conservatives opposed frivolous litigation.

If this mark on the studen't arm went away (healed completely) after three weeks, does the matter really belong in court?

As for his firing, was the marking voluntary, macho tomfoolery on the part of both teacher and student, or did the teacher force the student? To me, that question is relevant, and the news report is ambiguous.

Yes, he should be disciplined even if the tomfoolery were voluntary - but the question makes a difference to the degree of discipline.

429 moonstone  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:17:29pm

re: #315 Da_Beerfreak

There is a label, we're called normal.

Wow! That may be the first time I've ever had that label...I like it. :)

430 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:18:20pm

re: #428 InternationalObserver

I don't understand something. I thought conservatives opposed frivolous litigation.

If this mark on the studen't arm went away (healed completely) after three weeks, does the matter really belong in court?

As for his firing, was the marking voluntary, macho tomfoolery on the part of both teacher and student, or did the teacher force the student? To me, that question is relevant, and the news report is ambiguous.

Yes, he should be disciplined even if the tomfoolery were voluntary - but the question makes a difference to the degree of discipline.

It absolutely belongs in criminal court.

It's called assault and battery.

If it was voluntary, the adult teacher is still liable.

431 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:19:42pm

re: #428 InternationalObserver

It's not "frivolous litigation". No teacher has the right to physically harm their students. If a teacher hit your kid and left no mark would that be ok? Would you want others to tell you you can't sue because it's "frivolous" in their opinion, even if the law says you have the right to sue if you so desire?

432 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:19:49pm

I think it left to go tap it's foot in a bathroom stall.

433 Fat Jolly Penguin  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:20:53pm

re: #432 Killgore Trout

I think it left to go tap it's foot in a bathroom stall.

Still signed in. It dumped a nice one on #13 upstairs.

434 goddessoftheclassroom  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:21:22pm

re: #422 gettinby

And I find it all extremely delightful and heartwarming when locals of any flavor use their own tongue.

Besides...y'all just makes ...well, sense!

Bottom line (imho) though, is that teachers should use and teach the correct English. The locals can work it out later!

ABSOLUTELY. I tell my students that I will correct their grammar because being able to speak Standard English is essential for success.

There's a great passage in To Kill a Mockingbird where Calpurnia explains the importance of using the correct register for one's audience...

435 Archimedes  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:22:46pm

To me an intelligent design would have included a little module you plug into your body in order to affect repairs for any ailments. I mean, I could have a little computer screen and some software, run a diagnostic, perform debugging, and a virus check. It’d be nice to be able to just add and remove parts by plugging and unplugging them. Also, this whole thing about having to sleep 8 hours of every day is annoying. How about only having to sleep once a week, or one hour a day? And I’d like to not feel groggy in the morning and have loads of energy at all waking hours.

I think we need some design improvements here.

436 OldLineTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:28:25pm

re: #435 Archimedes

To me an intelligent design would have included a little module you plug into your body in order to affect repairs for any ailments. I mean, I could have a little computer screen and some software, run a diagnostic, perform debugging, and a virus check. It’d be nice to be able to just add and remove parts by plugging and unplugging them. Also, this whole thing about having to sleep 8 hours of every day is annoying. How about only having to sleep once a week, or one hour a day? And I’d like to not feel groggy in the morning and have loads of energy at all waking hours.

I think we need some design improvements here.

Get to evolving.

437 gettinby  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:31:06pm

re: #434 goddessoftheclassroom

ABSOLUTELY. I tell my students that I will correct their grammar because being able to speak Standard English is essential for success.

There's a great passage in To Kill a Mockingbird where Calpurnia explains the importance of using the correct register for one's audience...

It's sometimes fun to test this...

Speak correctly and watch reactions (typically the listeners react with a certain respect, if you know what I mean).

Speak the 'fun-tongue' (ain't, triple-negatives, etc.), and y'all can become oneuv'em.

/helpful if going to Hooters vs. Bern's
//both of which are wonderful in their own way. ;)

438 MJ  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:33:02pm

re: #402 Albertanator

"We have to have a balance.....and we are tragically rotting from the inside..."


Pat, Pat Buchanan, is that you?

439 abolitionist  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:40:36pm

re: #435 Archimedes

...Also, this whole thing about having to sleep 8 hours of every day is annoying. How about only having to sleep once a week, or one hour a day?...

When my youngest daughter was about 2, and settling down for a nap on my chest, she asked me, "Why do we sleep?"

I answered as best I could, saying that we likely have much more in common with the grass and the trees than most people would think of.

Years later, I elaborated. Trees and grass make their food using the daylight. At night, it helps that they slow things way down so they are not so likely to run out of it.

440 Da_Beerfreak  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:44:23pm

re: #425 OldLineTexan

Two posts in a row that I cannot understand.

I must be drunk.

Schweeeet!

Or not drunk enough?

-= DRINK =-

441 tokyobk  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:47:31pm

re: #352 The Pulchritudinous Patriot

wouldn't it be funny if God did create us and then tossed a bunch of fossils, sedimentary deposits and thinking humans into the mix...just to see what they'd come up with?
.

My friend who is a rabbi believes this. But why would God be tricking us? What kind of God is that that has a quirky human sense of humor? What if the God of our universe is not God in his own and we are like ants in some pre-adolescent kids ant farm or a science experement?

God (meaning th eone described by human religions) just seems to consistent with hopes and too easy an explanation for basic fears. But I hope I am wrong.

442 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:48:49pm
re: #270 Globular Cluster
That’s not quite the whole story, though; he also used a high frequency generator to burn a cross into a student’s arm.

Therefore, all proponents of intelligent design are cross-burning torturers. Sounds like the same criticism leveled at Ben Stein by some parties.

Man, I love a good knee-jerk reaction.

}:)     [Leaves them all pissed-off & nowhere to vent when they find out.]

443 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 5:49:59pm

re: #79 JCM

Hey, check this out...
Hey, watch this...
Hold, my beer for a sec...

Famous last words ...
Hey Yall Watch this

444 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:01:26pm

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

445 paxnhymn  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:03:50pm

re: #405 Killgore Trout

I'd much rather defend my country from people like you while I'm at it.

Now, kilgore, THAT reads like a leftist statement.

446 NonNativeTexan  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:04:03pm

re: #444 Charles

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

A little grace might be in order. They might sleep on it, or read
all of the thread.

447 JCM  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:05:24pm

re: #444 Charles

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

300 posted in 3 years, then drops in for an extended whinefest. Not really offensive, just annoying.

448 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:05:47pm

re: #444 Charles

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

Let him/her return
He/she did not get out of line just very very strange

449 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:07:06pm

re: #444 Charles

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

Thumbs down!
- bread and circuses

450 justadot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:08:28pm

re: #381 Albertanator

you cannot have it both ways Charles...your being awfully short sighted here Charles....

Huh?


#192 Albertanator 5/11/2008 7:06:46 pm PDT

Friends on all sides...please Charles and Fjord I think we all need to do some compromising...we have a horrific foe.......Islam....

Let's humble ourselves a bit on both sides.....A house divided is never a good thing!


Oh Lord, It's Hard To Be Humble

451 David IV of Georgia  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:10:43pm

re: #448 LeftJustAintRight

Perhaps too many Eclipses and Tequila Sunrises on an empty stomach.

452 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:14:23pm

re: #450 justadot

Heh- here's another:

Albertanator 11/03/2007 6:05:28 pm PDT

Friends, I like both LGF and Brussel's Journal...their both against Islam and its evil..........'can't we all just get along'......

And another:

Albertanator 1/17/2008 10:09:43 pm PST

Well I know this is a controversial issue but Winston Churchill himself said he would make an alliance with the Devil against Hitler...

I think in these times, Islam is the greatest danger on earth and only liberalism in all its form's rival's islam ........in that spirit, we ARE going to have to realize that this is not going to be a perfect war where are side is going to have to behave like angels....

I will take facists bastards against Islamic bastards.......and I can certainly understand why some far right Europeans feel the same way...

You have to be pragmatic and take the lessor of the 2 evils....in this case, Islam is the far greater evil along with its ally liberalism and the hard left....

I do not think we can appreciate being a European in North America....living in small countries and having their mainstream politicians sell them out and letting in millions of muslims...

It is only natural that people will react with extreme measures...

I hope no one on this board does not realize that Islam is a completely evil force that means harm for all of us....and if we HAVE to fight in a dirty manner, so be it....The left since man first walked this earth, in all of its form, has cheated, lied, stole and done anything to subvert decent society....and Islam is the same type of force...

Desperate times call for desperate measures!

I guess he'll take child abusing teachers for allies too.

453 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:14:45pm

The creationists are dinging again...

454 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:14:50pm

re: #452 Sharmuta

Ooops! Link to comment #2.

455 justadot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:15:39pm

re: #452 Sharmuta

Sharm, that's so much to pick from…

;-)

456 justadot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:16:05pm

re: #455 justadot

that's == there's

457 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:18:13pm

re: #455 justadot

Well- I think it gives a clear view on what type of poster we're dealing with here. A Fascist sympathizing, homophobic asshole who thinks he can tell our host what to do with his blog. While it's a nice thought to think he'll come back and read this thread and get a clue- his history reveals otherwise.

458 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:20:09pm

re: #450 justadot

re: #452 Sharmuta

Wow, just, wow. I sure made a lucky guess on the thread upstairs.

459 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:21:47pm

re: #458 Slumbering Behemoth

You did! Your BS detector is mighty!

460 justadot  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:22:22pm

re: #457 Sharmuta

I can't add that.

re: #458 Slumbering Behemoth

Heh. I saw that. Good call.

…I gotta back to work

461 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:24:27pm

re: #453 Charles

The creationists are dinging again...

The sewing circle of malignant busy-bodies strikes again!

Can I start calling them dingbats? Please?

462 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:24:33pm

re: #444 Charles

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

Can you find a story on a fascist creationist? heehee.

463 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:28:54pm

re: #459 Sharmuta

Thanks, I just had it recalibrated. It tends to get overworked on some of these threads and I have to send it to the shop every now and again.

464 David IV of Georgia  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:39:42pm

re: #453 Charles

The creationists are dinging again...

Ding Dong! The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch!
Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.
Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.
Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead. She's gone where the goblins go,
Below - below - below. Yo-ho, let's open up and sing and ring the bells out.
Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low.
Let them know
The Wicked Witch is dead!

465 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:46:29pm

Creationists are ranting at Roger Simon's blog too:

[Link: www.rogerlsimon.com...]

466 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:51:03pm

Or maybe it's someone pissed off at me for another reason.

Take a ticket. Get in line.

467 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:53:11pm

re: #466 Charles

Or maybe it's someone pissed off at me for another reason.

Take a ticket. Get in line.


You know you are doing something right when the crazy people get their panties in a wad
LOL

468 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 6:54:40pm
Brother Charles can get work on the Human Rights Commission in Canada. What happen to: "I may disagree with what you said but I will defend your right to say it"? Seems like LGF is an echo chamber.

Posted by: jrdroll

Charles Johnson Liberal IDIOT!

Posted by: jrdroll

Sounds like someone who's got a grudge. Or maybe just basement dweller that needs to get out more.

469 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:01:52pm

Interesting- if you search "creationist" and "fascist" ron paul shows up.

470 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:11:46pm

Good research there Shamuta.

471 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:13:47pm

re: #470 Thanos

Thank you.

472 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:14:01pm

/pimf Sharmuta

473 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:17:57pm

re: #444 Charles

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

Since I just found out about it, I say let it go for a while just for lizard entertainment purposes only. Kind of like a cat playing with a mouse before eating it.

/Sorry, I'm just a bit cruel and unusual to folks like Albertanator.

474 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:18:43pm
re: #402 Albertanator
#387

This website , which has been in the past for the exposing of dangers of Islam and the Loony left seems to be taking a nasty nasty turn lately..

So...Dude right back at you....

Believe it or not....it isn't healthly for a nation to practice every hedonist impulse in the books....ie Gay Marriage and so on and so forth...

We have to have a balance.....and we are tragically rotting from the inside....which makes it much much easier for Islam to takeover...not to mention the lunatic left!

You know, Al, if you ARE gay, it's okay?  Really.  You don't have to hide behind this macho-over-reacting baloney act, you can have the lifestyle and choices you secretly want.  Really.  I look at what you wrote and I see a poor brave little guy crying for the forbidden love and attention he's been craving all his life.  Well, those days are over, mister.  You can be as top or bottom as you want, a slave or a daddy, a frilly-wearing girly guy or a buff and bad biker boy.

}:)     [C'mon everyone, group hug for Al ... ]

475 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:19:12pm

I have a question...

Is it possible to disagree with homosexuality and not be considered a homophobe, bigoted or evil?

476 MJ  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:20:47pm

re: #468 Slumbering Behemoth

Sounds like someone who's got a grudge. Or maybe just basement dweller that needs to get out more.

jrdroll used to post here before he was banned.

477 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:20:54pm

re: #475 MrSpock

I have a question...

Is it possible to disagree with homosexuality and not be considered a homophobe, bigoted or evil?

Nope
And racist too

478 snowcrash  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:21:15pm

Let the Albertanator stay. He was crushing on Killgore in#423. LOL sorry KT, just kiddin'

479 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:22:53pm

re: #475 MrSpock

Can you elaborate on what you mean by "disagree with homosexuality"?

480 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:24:32pm

re: #479 Sharmuta

Can you elaborate on what you mean by "disagree with homosexuality"?

I take that as it ain't right
Nothing natural about it

481 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:28:28pm

re: #444 Charles

The Albertanator has left the building.

What to do? Ban it, or let it return for another round of surreal intarweb conflict?

Ooops, sorry, dinged you the wrong way, wanted to ding you up but was hitting the wrong target.

If this is a vote, I vote to let Al stay.  Aside from the froth, he seems a fun fellow, easily amusing.

}:)     [Again, sorry for the misding ... ]

482 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:31:18pm

re: #477 LeftJustAintRight

If you are not homosexual, doesn't that mean you disagree with it?

483 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:33:11pm

re: #482 bubbalouey

If you are not homosexual, doesn't that mean you disagree with it?

If you want to get technical
Yes

484 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:36:45pm

re: #483 LeftJustAintRight

Well, I didn't want to get technical, just practical and realistic.

485 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:42:21pm

re: #475 MrSpock

I have a question...

Is it possible to disagree with homosexuality and not be considered a homophobe, bigoted or evil?

I suppose it all depends on how one voices their "disagreement".

I think the simplest and most appropriate way for a person to voice their "disagreement" with homosexuality is to not engage in homosexual behavior.

486 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:43:48pm

re: #476 MJ

Ah... so it is a petty grudge type thing. Still, it also needs to get out more, or find a more productive hobby.

487 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:45:36pm

re: #476 MJ

jrdroll used to post here before he was banned.

Yep, banned for being an ass, IIRC. I believe he left more than a few droppings on Charles's living room floor. May have pissed on the couch while he was at it.

488 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:49:39pm

re: #475 MrSpock

Since you're not responding to me, I guess I'll try to answer your question as best I can without really knowing what the question is.

You can "disagree with homosexuality" and not be a bigot or homophobe if you don't hate gay people simply because they're different from you. I "disagree with homosexuality" in that I'm straight, but I have gay friends and family members, and I really don't care what gets them off in the bedroom. I don't think they're evil people and I don't presume to know if they're going to Hell simply because they're interested in the same sex. It's my opinion that they're born the way they are and to deny themselves who they are is just as wrong as anyone else might think homosexuality is wrong. I don't believe in living lies, and I can't condemn a gay person for not living a lie either.

489 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:53:34pm

re: #475 MrSpock

Are you hitting on me too? What's with you guys tonight?

490 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:55:52pm

re: #489 Killgore Trout

You should turn the charm down a notch.

491 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 7:56:56pm

re: #482 bubbalouey

If you are not homosexual, doesn't that mean you disagree with it?

Nah, that just means you're a heterosexual. Not that there's anything wrong with that. :)

Me, I'm just a guy who likes gals. I neither agree nor disagree with homosexuality, it just doesn't appeal to me. That's just the way I was born.

492 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:01:57pm

re: #491 Slumbering Behemoth

So, you support them, but you don't support their mission?

493 faraway  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:04:44pm

I thought we had freedom of religion in the US?

Sounds like most here don't want that.

494 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:05:03pm

re: #488 Sharmuta

Shar, if I may add something?

It isn't just what gets them off in the bedroom; it's who they fall in love with.

(I agree with your comment, though.)

495 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:05:39pm

re: #488 Sharmuta

I really don't care what gets them off in the bedroom


I used to feel about the same
But
They have forced the issue
They want everyone to believe it is normal
They are forcing gay marriage down our throats
And I still have not found gay rights in the constitution

496 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:06:33pm

re: #489 Killgore Trout

It's your mad cooking skills KT, that sort of ability just wins guys over. Shoot, if being homosexual really were a choice, I'd probably choose a guy like yourself.

re: #492 bubbalouey

So, you support them, but you don't support their mission?

Now that was funny. Good thing I just got my sarc-o-meter back from the shop, otherwise I would have missed it for lack of a tag.

497 faraway  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:06:59pm

Everyone has perverse thoughts.

Doesnt mean we should promote acting on them.

Simple as that.

498 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:07:09pm

re: #493 faraway

The Constitution is a living document, and inevitably, it must evolve.

499 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:07:49pm

re: #493 faraway

I thought we had freedom of religion in the US?

Sounds like most here don't want that.

Uh- the First Amendment protects us from the government promoting and/or prohibiting state religion. Promoting a specific religion in a public school is a violation of the First Amendment.

500 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:08:23pm

re: #490 bubbalouey

Maybe I should take off my tank top and Daisy Dukes too.

501 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:08:54pm

re: #495 LeftJustAintRight

Now you're just painting a group of people with a gigantic, broad brush.

If what you say were true, how would that explain the Log Cabin Republicans?

502 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:09:24pm

re: #496 Slumbering Behemoth

I guess I am accustomed to people reading my facial expressions or something, I never even think to tag.

503 carray  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:09:46pm

So, how is he different from the leftist liberal nuts who indoctrinate students into "America is evil"? None of them are fired but he is? I guess the lesson is, indoctrinate, but don't burn.

504 faraway  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:09:49pm
Sharmuta, Promoting a specific religion in a public school

What specific religion exactly? Jewish, Catholics, Muslims, Buddhists?

505 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:10:33pm

re: #500 Killgore Trout

Maybe I should take off my tank top and Daisy Dukes too.

Well, if you intend to put something different on, otherwise...

506 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:10:34pm

re: #504 faraway

Did you read the link? This thread?

507 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:10:56pm

re: #495 LeftJustAintRight

And I still have not found gay rights in the constitution


You won't find right for blacks, women or Jews either. Keep looking.

508 faraway  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:11:25pm

Dont read no anglish too good out here.

509 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:12:50pm

re: #388 Albertanator

And yes...the Darwinists have more then their fair share of nuts and nazis too....Check out PZ Myers....

Two can play this game Charles!

Fuck you, dude. I've actually talked with PZ Myers online and found him rather amenable, unlike you, troll.

510 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:13:27pm

re: #494 Josephine

Shar, if I may add something?

It isn't just what gets them off in the bedroom; it's who they fall in love with.

(I agree with your comment, though.)

I'm glad you added that, Josephine- you're exactly right.

511 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:14:03pm

re: #482 bubbalouey

If you are not homosexual, doesn't that mean you disagree with it?

No. If you are not Irish, does that mean you disagree with it? (whatever that means).

512 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:15:26pm

re: #492 bubbalouey

So, you support them, but you don't support their mission?

What "mission" are you talking about?

513 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:15:29pm

re: #510 Sharmuta

Thanks. ; )

514 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:16:42pm

re: #501 Slumbering Behemoth

Now you're just painting a group of people with a gigantic, broad brush.

If what you say were true, how would that explain the Log Cabin Republicans?

No explanation needed
Like I said
I used to not care what people did in the privacy of their homes
They are trying to mainstream homosexual behavior
In my opinion
They know it is not right and they can't get the acceptance they want
So they are shoving that lifestyle down our throats and make most of us that do not agree the bad guys

515 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:18:00pm

re: #511 Lynn B.

I guess you are saying that being irish is a behavior?

There might be some truth to that.

516 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:19:21pm

re: #512 Lynn B.

I am not talking about a mission, it was a joke.

517 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:20:19pm

re: #498 bubbalouey

The Constitution is a living document, and inevitably, it must evolve.

Is this another joke?

518 Sloppy  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:20:33pm

We had a rabid creationist biology teacher in high school. Raved and snarled. Pounded the desk. Yelled about monkeys. This was about 50 years ago, but as best I can recall, none of us paid any attention to him. Aside from that, I think he was a pretty good teacher.

519 bubbalouey  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:22:16pm

re: #517 Sharmuta


Well ,what will get the most play, joke or not a joke?

520 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:22:54pm

re: #514 LeftJustAintRight

No explanation needed
Like I said
I used to not care what people did in the privacy of their homes
They are trying to mainstream homosexual behavior
In my opinion
They know it is not right and they can't get the acceptance they want
So they are shoving that lifestyle down our throats and make most of us that do not agree the bad guys

Can we step back a minute? What does that mean? Who is shoving whose lifestyle down whose throat? Is anyone trying to coerce you into being gay? Is anyone making you out to be a "bad guy" because you don't agree to be gay? Or because you don't agree to live and let live. Is anyone trying to curtail your rights or your job opportunities because you're straight? Bottom line: how does the lifestyle of someone you don't even know or want to know threaten your own?

521 phoenixgirl  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:28:09pm

first!/

522 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:28:39pm

re: #520 Lynn B.

Can we step back a minute? What does that mean? Who is shoving whose lifestyle down whose throat? Is anyone trying to coerce you into being gay? Is anyone making you out to be a "bad guy" because you don't agree to be gay? Or because you don't agree to live and let live. Is anyone trying to curtail your rights or your job opportunities because you're straight? Bottom line: how does the lifestyle of someone you don't even know or want to know threaten your own?

Cause they have their own gay rights that trump individual rights
It is very disturbing that Gays are normal and us breeders are the bad crazy ones

523 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:28:51pm

re: #514 LeftJustAintRight

Again, I'll direct you to the Log Cabin Republicans. To the best of my knowledge they are not shoving their lifestyle down anyone's throat.

If I was of a mind to paint an entire group of people with a broad, stereotypical brush, I could just as easily point to the LCR and say that all gays are conservative republicans.

524 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:31:28pm

re: #523 Slumbering Behemoth

Again, I'll direct you to the Log Cabin Republicans. To the best of my knowledge they are not shoving their lifestyle down anyone's throat.

If I was of a mind to paint an entire group of people with a broad, stereotypical brush, I could just as easily point to the LCR and say that all gays are conservative republicans.

Log Cabin Republicans are not pushing the issue
The Democrat and Libs are

525 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:32:50pm

re: #524 LeftJustAintRight

Gee- because leftists have never been know to use a minority group to further their agenda....

526 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:32:55pm

re: #479 Sharmuta

Can you elaborate on what you mean by "disagree with homosexuality"?

How about in the same way that I disagree with illicit recreational drug use. I think its harmful and I don't think it should be promoted as a legitimate, state-sanctioned lifestyle.

527 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:33:24pm

re: #526 MrSpock

How about in the same way that I disagree with illicit recreational drug use. I think its harmful and I don't think it should be promoted as a legitimate, state-sanctioned lifestyle.

Amen

528 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:36:20pm

re: #525 Sharmuta

Gee- because leftists have never been know to use a minority group to further their agenda....

There you go
Why are they a minority group?
They are just people of the same sex that love each other I thought
Gay rights
Illegal immigrant rights
Gitmo detainees rights

Where does it end ?

529 Nat-X  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:36:28pm

I had a hard time keeping my mouth shut when I taught high school for a little while, except I was pushing conservative political views. Those 9th and 10th graders seem to innately agree with conservatism. I figured they'll be indoctriniated into leftist ideology soon enough if they went to college.

530 Syrah  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:37:09pm

I first came across LGF shortly after 911.

I didn't post or participate here. I was preoccupied with the almost totally unmoderated Flame Wars on the Yahoo BBS message boards.

I began to pay more attention to LGF when the Rathergate throbbing memo was posted. That simple bit of brilliance amazed me. Anyone could have done. But it was Charles that did it.

When the Yahoo Boards were put down, I decided to try to become a member here. It took awhile. Longer then I thought it would take, but eventually, I finally managed to catch an open registration and get in.

I like it here.

I am probably far more conservative in my religious and political philosophy than most of the posters here. I could be wrong, but that is my impression. I perceived that it was so before I joined up. I don't expect it to change.

It would be silly for me to think that I would find in LGF a mirror image of my religion, my values and my politics. That others here hold views wildly different from mine, is something that I can accept. I don't feel that I have to contend every difference nor do I feel that I have to win every argument. I don't have to agree with everybody here, and they don't have to agree with me.

My presence does not mean that the center here will shift to perfectly accommodate my worldview. I didn't sign up to change LGF. LGF is what it is. I like it. I think it is a blessing that it exists.

I am a little bothered by how many of my fellow Lizards are behaving of late.

This is not our house. We are guest here.

Like guests in someone else's house, we may have to accept that our host and his other guests hold opinions and views of the world that we do not. It behooves us out of plain good manners and rigorous intellectual honesty to consider whether or not it might be we that are in the wrong rather then reflexively striking back. It also might be wise to consider whether or not a particular point of contention is worth a no holds barred confrontation.

Sometimes we need to type slower, think more, and check our emotions. Not every battle must or even should be fought.

I think that the world is in for some very dark and terrible times. We will need all of the safe harbors, like LGF, that we can find.

Put on your thick Lizard Skins my compatriots. We will need them.

531 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:39:56pm

re: #529 Nat-X

I had a hard time keeping my mouth shut when I taught high school for a little while, except I was pushing conservative political views. Those 9th and 10th graders seem to innately agree with conservatism. I figured they'll be indoctriniated into leftist ideology soon enough if they went to college.

However, ID is not a conservative value.

532 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:42:32pm

re: #524 LeftJustAintRight

Precisely my point. The LCR is a gay political group that is not trying to push their lifestyle down anyone's throat.

However, in your #495 and #514 you stereotype all gay Americans as trying to push their lifestyle down your throat.

533 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:43:39pm

re: #528 LeftJustAintRight

So- equal rights under the law unless you're gay?

534 lostlakehiker  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:44:30pm

re: #35 ec marm

Good for the teacher. Hands-on induction into electricity.

Geeeettttt it?

535 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:45:18pm

re: #533 Sharmuta

So- equal rights under the law unless you're gay?


Why should gay rights trump individual rights ?

536 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:46:52pm

Again, I think we are seeing the "satanic influence spreading throughout society" meme being brought up here. There is no reasoning behind this line of thinking. It's what fundamentalist preachers use to scare their congregations into returning the following Sunday.

537 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:47:18pm

re: #535 LeftJustAintRight

Why should gay rights trump individual rights ?

Are not some of them the same? Individual rights all around?

538 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:49:03pm

re: #533 Sharmuta

Good night
No ill will to anyone
Just my opinions
And like A$$holes
We all have them
I am going to sleep till noon I hope

539 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:49:33pm

re: #535 LeftJustAintRight

Why should gay rights trump individual rights ?

You'd have to explain how that works. I ask again: is anyone trying to coerce you into becoming gay or depriving you of something you were otherwise entitled to because you're straight?

540 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:50:51pm

re: #538 LeftJustAintRight

I was hoping you would answer Honorary Yooper and Lynn B. before you go.

541 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:50:56pm

re: #537 Honorary Yooper

Are not some of them the same? Individual rights all around?

They should be
They are supposed to be
But for some reason it has all gotten lost in translation

542 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:51:20pm

re: #530 Syrah

Very well stated. Thank you.

543 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:53:20pm

re: #539 Lynn B.

is anyone trying to coerce you into becoming gay or depriving you of something you were otherwise entitled to because you're straight?


No
But they are changing the fabric of society and trying to make that lifestyle normal

544 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:56:33pm

re: #539 Lynn B.

You'd have to explain how that works. I ask again: is anyone trying to coerce you into becoming gay or depriving you of something you were otherwise entitled to because you're straight?

I know it is an unfair comparison
but NAMBLA is the worst of them all

545 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:58:15pm

re: #544 LeftJustAintRight

I know it is an unfair comparison
but NAMBLA is the worst of them all

No- what's an unfair comparison is homosexuals and Gitmo detainees.

546 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:58:32pm

re: #544 LeftJustAintRight

I know it is an unfair comparison
but NAMBLA is the worst of them all

However, NAMBLA is not strictly gay. There are a lot of gays just as appalled by NAMBLA as straight folks are appalled by NAMBLA.

547 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:58:35pm

re: #544 LeftJustAintRight

You're right, that is an unfair comparison. Homosexuals are not equivalent to child molesters.

548 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 8:59:35pm

re: #526 MrSpock

How about in the same way that I disagree with illicit recreational drug use. I think its harmful and I don't think it should be promoted as a legitimate, state-sanctioned lifestyle.

Well, we agree that illicit (how about licit?) recreational drug use is harmful and shouldn't be promoted (we'll leave the discussion of whether it should be illegal for another day). But we obviously disagree as to any conceivable parallel between recreational drug use and personal affectional preferences, which is an absurd comparison. I'm about to sign off for the night, so I guess this is a rhetorical question but, once again I'll ask: to whom is homosexuality harmful and what business does the state have sanctioning lifestyles in the first place?

549 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:00:00pm

re: #528 LeftJustAintRight

There you go
Why are they a minority group?
They are just people of the same sex that love each other I thought
Gay rights
Illegal immigrant rights
Gitmo detainees rights

Where does it end ?

Let's see, you have lumped together gays, criminals, and terrorists. Is that about right?

550 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:01:58pm

re: #545 Sharmuta

No- what's an unfair comparison is homosexual and Gitmo detainees.

Tell that to the SC that just gave them rights they should not have
homosexuals got the 9th Circuit to give them rights they do not have
Fair Comparison

551 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:03:37pm

re: #549 The Shadow Do

See 550

552 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:05:24pm

re: #551 LeftJustAintRight

See 550

You really need to step back a pace or two and think about your analogy.

553 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:05:40pm

re: #544 LeftJustAintRight

I know it is an unfair comparison
but NAMBLA is the worst of them all

Leaving aside the fact that NAMBLA has no more to do with homosexuality than molestation of little girls by adult men has to do with hetersexuality, I ask again: is anyone trying to coerce you into becoming gay or depriving you of something you were otherwise entitled to because you're straight?

(sorry to repeat myself but you're not answering the question)

554 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:06:33pm

re: #550 LeftJustAintRight

I think you should stick to your #538, and hit the sack. You're not making any sense.

555 LeftJustAintRight  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:07:27pm

re: #553 Lynn B.

Leaving aside the fact that NAMBLA has no more to do with homosexuality than molestation of little girls by adult men has to do with hetersexuality, I ask again: is anyone trying to coerce you into becoming gay or depriving you of something you were otherwise entitled to because you're straight?

(sorry to repeat myself but you're not answering the question)

See post [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

556 MJ  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:09:26pm

re: #543 LeftJustAintRight

No
But they are changing the fabric of society and trying to make that lifestyle normal

The "fabric of society" is not static. It is constantly changing. Seen any Pilgrims around lately?

557 Josephine  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:09:48pm

re: #543 LeftJustAintRight

No
But they are changing the fabric of society and trying to make that lifestyle normal

Being gay is normal. Gay people are just statistically a minority. (Blue-eyed blondes are a minority, too. Green-eyed redheads even more so.)

Different gay people have different lifestyles with which I may or may not agree.

You are confusing lifestyle with orientation; they are two different things. But I am sure you deny that, so I won't worry about convincing you otherwise.

Good night, folks.

558 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:10:16pm

re: #550 LeftJustAintRight

Tell that to the SC that just gave them rights they should not have
homosexuals got the 9th Circuit to give them rights they do not have
Fair Comparison

Um, one has to deal with Americans who merely wish to get married, and the other is enemy combatants who are not American citizens, and should be subject to the Geneva Conventions, IMHO. We've been very nice not to place them under Geneva for you do know what happens to fighters not in uniform under Geneva.

Not a good analogy.

559 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:10:22pm

re: #533 Sharmuta

So- equal rights under the law unless you're gay?

Hi Sharmuta,

Am I missing something...

Homosexuals have the same rights as heterosexuals...

560 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:12:22pm

re: #555 LeftJustAintRight

Sorry. That's not an answer to the question. Unless you're trying to say that you have a right not to have the "fabric of society" changed in a way that's offensive to you. Well, the slaveholders in the South and the folks who believed women shouldn't vote felt the same way. So you're in good company. Not.

561 Lynn B.  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:15:21pm

re: #559 MrSpock

Hi Sharmuta,

Am I missing something...

Homosexuals have the same rights as heterosexuals...

In California. At the moment. More or less.

562 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:24:22pm

Gaybashing is dopey.

563 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:26:12pm

re: #559 MrSpock

All American are supposed to be equal under the law. I'll leave it to you to figure out if that's how it really is or not.

564 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:31:06pm

Apparently, there are some people with accounts at LGF who think this is a place where gay-bashing will be accepted.

565 Charles  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:35:53pm

I decided I don't really care how far out Albertanator is going to go; I don't want this caveman posting anything else at LGF.

566 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:45:53pm

re: #503 carray

So, how is he different from the leftist liberal nuts who indoctrinate students into "America is evil"? None of them are fired but he is? I guess the lesson is, indoctrinate, but don't burn.

Um- any teacher who physically abuses their students should be fired.

567 Thanos  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:46:57pm

To help wrap this thread up, read the content of the post here, and then look in the right sidebar to see what presidential candidate they support(ed).

568 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:47:41pm

I expect the typical, sand-in-the-vagina, seething and whining will commence.

At least they won't be doing it on this blog.

569 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:50:40pm

re: #548 Lynn B.

Well, we agree that illicit (how about licit?) recreational drug use is harmful and shouldn't be promoted (we'll leave the discussion of whether it should be illegal for another day). But we obviously disagree as to any conceivable parallel between recreational drug use and personal affectional preferences, which is an absurd comparison. I'm about to sign off for the night, so I guess this is a rhetorical question but, once again I'll ask: to whom is homosexuality harmful and what business does the state have sanctioning lifestyles in the first place?

Hi Lynn,

I guess I had two points when I asked this question:

1. The topic of homosexuality has become extremely PC. This means that anyone who disagrees with its acceptance as normal (for whatever reasons) is usually shut down or portrayed as a bible-thumping fundamentalist.

Like my earlier comments regarding ID, I'm concerned that the ability to hold rational discourse on hot-button topics here at LGF is diminishing (which is sad). I wanted to know if I could speak up and be heard, or if I would be attacked simply because I didn't hold the currently popular viewpoint.

2. The acceptance or rejection of homosexuality (or anything other behavior) within a culture is defined by the mores of that culture.
These mores can be influenced / dictated by religious, social, economic and historical pressures, but fundamentally they define what is acceptable and what is taboo.

Fifty years ago, homosexuality, like a host of other behaviors (drug use, polygamy, bestiality, incest, self-mutilation, suicide, etc..), was considered taboo.

In the intervening time, we have seen a radical shift in its acceptance as normal, a long with many others. YOU may feel that illicit drug use is taboo, while homosexuality is just fine, but there are others who say that not only are drugs OK, but that "if it harm none, do as thou wilt".

This is the same relativistic viewpoint that the one-world, marxist / socialist types espouse. It is there justification for everything they do and is at the heart of their agenda to remake America in their image.

/rant off

570 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:52:46pm
re: #492 bubbalouey
re: #491 Slumbering Behemoth

So, you support them, but you don't support their mission?

Their ... mission?

}:)     [Jeepers!  Everyone duck!  It's GaySquad!]

571 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:54:28pm

re: #569 MrSpock

So- as you don't want their morals shoved on you, you would be a hypocrite and shove yours on them?

572 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 9:55:58pm

re: #569 MrSpock

That's illogical, Mr. Spock.

573 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:03:04pm

re: #570 Kulhwch

Oh no, not the GaySquad!

FWIW, Bubbalouey indicated he was making a joke. I am not familiar with that Lizard's posts/history, so I am inclined to take him/her at his/her word on it.

574 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:04:47pm
re: #500 Killgore Trout
re: #490 bubbalouey

Maybe I should take off my tank top and Daisy Dukes too.

Okay, now you're just being a tease ...

}:)     [Corky Romano: I don't care how gay you are!]

575 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:05:43pm

so disagreeing withre: #563 Sharmuta

All American are supposed to be equal under the law. I'll leave it to you to figure out if that's how it really is or not.


And my point is that the ability to marry someone of the same sex is not a RIGHT. Just like polygamy, or marrying your dog, or suicide are not RIGHTS, neither is homosexual marriage.

People who are attracted to members of the same sex (homosexuals) have the exact same right to marry members of the opposite sex as anyone else. That is the definition of equal rights under the law.

Just because this is not what they want, does not mean that they suddenly have a RIGHT to do something that has not been done within our culture before.

If you think the laws should be changed to allow this, that's one thing, but saying they have a right (and I'm assuming you mean a Constitutional one...) to do so, is a fallacy.

Many states have taken this issue to their legislative body and defined, according to their individual state constitutions, that Marriage is to be solely defined as a union between a man and a women.

If the people of a state want to define same sex marriage as acceptable, then that is their Constitutional right to do so. But what is happening is that the true will of the people is being overturned by activist judges with a social agenda.

576 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:06:34pm

re: #575 MrSpock

Just because this is not what they want, does not mean that they suddenly have a RIGHT to do something that has not been done within our culture before.

Like women voting?

577 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:07:45pm

re: #575 MrSpock

Do I need to find Captain Kirk and report his First Officer for conduct unbecoming of a Vulcan, that of being illogical?

578 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:08:06pm

If your god fates fags then I hate you.
/Blasphemy is a victimless crime.

579 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:08:10pm

re: #575 MrSpock

This has also been used as an argument against black people being treated equally.

580 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:11:17pm

re: #528 LeftJustAintRight

There you go
Why are they a minority group?
They are just people of the same sex that love each other I thought
Gay rights
Illegal immigrant rights
Gitmo detainees rights

Where does it end ?

}:)     [Meltdown ... ]

581 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:13:37pm

re: #571 Sharmuta

So- as you don't want their morals shoved on you, you would be a hypocrite and shove yours on them?

Sharmuta, let me ask you this...

In your world, when is it OK to stand up and say that you think what someone else is doing is wrong?

582 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:14:23pm

re: #581 MrSpock

Sharmuta, let me ask you this...

In your world, when is it OK to stand up and say that you think what someone else is doing is wrong?

Why is it wrong for two people to be with each other if they so choose? Who do you think you are to say it is wrong?

583 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:15:07pm

I smell a logical fallacy.

584 NY Nana  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:16:04pm

re: #383 Killgore Trout

Thanks, Killgore

As a Type 2, I think I will give it a try. Also NY Grampa.

/We sure know how to partay!

585 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:16:27pm

re: #581 MrSpock

To answer your first question- the question that started this entire derailment.... Yes- you're a homophobic bigot.

586 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:16:42pm

re: #583 jaunte

I smell a logical fallacy.

Ironic that he should call himself Mr. Spock. Must be the evil Mr. Spock from the alternate universe where the Terran Empire rules with an iron fist.

587 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:17:29pm

re: #586 Honorary Yooper

The Empire of the Scarlet Herring.

588 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:19:19pm

re: #576 Sharmuta

Like women voting?

Again another emotional red herring.

Behaviors are not Rights.

Your argument, taken to its logical conclusion, is that everything s/b a Right, because at one point women / blacks could not vote, but now they do?

So by simply associating my particular cause celebre with the historical plight of women / blacks, I get a magic hall-pass that says I have a right to do whatever I want?

"Help, help... my right to marry my Mother is being oppressed! I demand equal treatment under law!"

/sarcasm off...

589 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:19:30pm

re: #581 MrSpock

To answer this question- to tell two adults genuinely in love that they are wrong is something I would never do.

590 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:19:34pm

re: #561 Lynn B.

In California. At the moment. More or less.

Just barely, I think.  From my lofty perch here in Sacramento ...

}:)     [I admire your perseverence ... even if I can't spell it!]

591 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:20:43pm

re: #588 MrSpock

Voting is a behavior I engage in every election year.

592 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:21:14pm

re: #578 Killgore Trout

If your god fates fags then I hate you.
/Blasphemy is a victimless crime.

are you being sarcastic?

593 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:21:48pm

re: #588 MrSpock

Oh get over it. We already have inscet laws on the books for that, and marriage (civil unions if you will) have to be between two unrelated (beyond first cousins) consenting people who are not minors.

What's your beef?

/You obviously cannot be Mr. Spock as he is logical. I say you are a Romulan imposter.

594 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:24:02pm

re: #592 MrSpock

No. Are you?

595 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:24:16pm

re: #582 Honorary Yooper

Why is it wrong for two people to be with each other if they so choose? Who do you think you are to say it is wrong?

Why is it wrong for a full-grown man to sleep with his mother?

Why is wrong to shoot-up on heroine?

Why is wrong to commit suicide?

?

596 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:25:57pm

re: #595 MrSpock

Why is it wrong for a full-grown man to sleep with his mother?

Why is wrong to shoot-up on heroine?

Why is wrong to commit suicide?

?

All different things with different reasons, but your comparing them here is a red herring and lets your agenda slip through. I've read your comments on this thread.

597 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:27:02pm

re: #595 MrSpock
"If gays have the same rights as straight people, there are no rules governing any human behavior."

Find the undistributed middle. It's a logic thing.

598 NY Nana  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:27:59pm

re: #593 Honorary Yooper

/And he would never associate with Mr. Sulu.

599 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:28:45pm

re: #598 NY Nana

LMAO!

600 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:29:08pm

re: #598 NY Nana

Funniest thing yet on this thread. LOL!

601 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:29:58pm

re: #573 Slumbering Behemoth

Oh no, not the GaySquad!

FWIW, Bubbalouey indicated he was making a joke. I am not familiar with that Lizard's posts/history, so I am inclined to take him/her at his/her word on it.

Yeah, saw that after the fact.  Missed the sarc tag, so I must be getting tired.  Apologies all around ...

}:)     [Who's behind the GaySquad ... ]

602 NY Nana  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:31:00pm

re: #599 Sharmuta

Sharm,

/He might catch the cooties!

603 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:31:34pm

re: #602 NY Nana

Or send Sulu to hell.

604 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:31:34pm

re: #575 MrSpock

so disagreeing with


And my point is that the ability to marry someone of the same sex is not a RIGHT. Just like polygamy, or marrying your dog, or suicide are not RIGHTS, neither is homosexual marriage.

People who are attracted to members of the same sex (homosexuals) have the exact same right to marry members of the opposite sex as anyone else. That is the definition of equal rights under the law.

Just because this is not what they want, does not mean that they suddenly have a RIGHT to do something that has not been done within our culture before.

If you think the laws should be changed to allow this, that's one thing, but saying they have a right (and I'm assuming you mean a Constitutional one...) to do so, is a fallacy.

Many states have taken this issue to their legislative body and defined, according to their individual state constitutions, that Marriage is to be solely defined as a union between a man and a women.

If the people of a state want to define same sex marriage as acceptable, then that is their Constitutional right to do so. But what is happening is that the true will of the people is being overturned by activist judges with a social agenda.

Right now, gay people are allowed to marry in California. In the future, more states will allow gays to marry. Just because something was taboo in the past doesn't make for an argument against having it in the future. We are talking about individual rights. Gay people have the right to get married. They are not harming anyone by getting married.

605 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:33:09pm

re: #593 Honorary Yooper

Oh get over it. We already have inscet laws on the books for that, and marriage (civil unions if you will) have to be between two unrelated (beyond first cousins) consenting people who are not minors.

What's your beef?

/You obviously cannot be Mr. Spock as he is logical. I say you are a Romulan imposter.

I don't have a beef.

I'm trying to make a logical point, and rather than addressing my point, you and others are making ad hominem attacks.

Why is it illogical to say that, just as homosexuality (which was once taboo) is now accepted, so too can any other taboo behavior become "accepted" if you go far enough afield and lose your cultural compass.

There is no way to logically deny the right to INCEST or POLYGAMY or any other behavior, if you use "love" as the yardstick to define what is or is not a right.

606 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:33:25pm

re: #603 Sharmuta

Or send Sulu to hell.

What's he gonna use, a Vulcan neck pinch?

607 NY Nana  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:34:24pm

re: #600 Honorary Yooper

Funniest thing yet on this thread. LOL!

I thought it needed just a soupçon of attempted humor after all the crap posted by some ex-posters and someone who may have a banning in his future. *cough**cough*

608 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:34:46pm

Slippery slopeism.

609 NY Nana  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:35:08pm

re: #603 Sharmuta

Or send Sulu to hell.

Spock had better not mess with Sulu!

610 NY Nana  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:35:49pm

re: #608 jaunte

Slippery slopeism.

Nomination for a rotating title!

611 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:36:28pm

re: #608 jaunte

Slippery slopeism.

Indeed- if we allow gays to marry, the next thing you know- it will be mass pandemonium! Cats and dogs living together....

612 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:37:04pm

re: #611 Sharmuta

The fabric of society will be fabulous!

613 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:38:01pm

re: #576 Sharmuta

Like women voting?

Or blacks being free?

}:)     [Talk about being unSpock-like!]

614 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:39:29pm

re: #605 MrSpock

I don't have a beef.

I'm trying to make a logical point, and rather than addressing my point, you and others are making ad hominem attacks.

Why is it illogical to say that, just as homosexuality (which was once taboo) is now accepted, so too can any other taboo behavior become "accepted" if you go far enough afield and lose your cultural compass.

There is no way to logically deny the right to INCEST or POLYGAMY or any other behavior, if you use "love" as the yardstick to define what is or is not a right.

You're supposed to be logical here, Mr. Spock, so now act on your namesake. If you read my comment, you should notice that I say we already constrain marriage regarding incest and polygamy. Now, I never said anything about any taboo behaviour. Why should something someone has no choice over be taboo anyway? If they have no choice, should they be denyed the opportunity to be happy, as I should? And what can they screw up in marriage that we as straight folks haven't already screwed up anyway?

You strike me as an illgoical bigot.

615 Throbert McGee  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:39:37pm

Sharmuta! Here I am!

616 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:40:34pm

re: #604 gman

Right now, gay people are allowed to marry in California. In the future, more states will allow gays to marry. Just because something was taboo in the past doesn't make for an argument against having it in the future. We are talking about individual rights. Gay people have the right to get married. They are not harming anyone by getting married.

What about the states that have defined in their constitutions that marriage is a union between man and woman?

What if Californian's successfully overrides the judicial branch by adding an amendment to the state constitution to the same effect?

Should their / (our) legislative authority be overridden by activist judges pushing a socialist agenda?

Would you take the same view in an area that you disagreed with (gun rights, abortion, privacy laws, etc...)

617 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:40:42pm

re: #615 Throbert McGee

YES!

/Read up thread a little- start at about #569....

618 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:43:39pm

re: #613 Kulhwch

Or blacks being free?

}:)     [Talk about being unSpock-like!]

See#588

619 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:46:12pm

re: #577 Honorary Yooper

Do I need to find Captain Kirk and report his First Officer for conduct unbecoming of a Vulcan, that of being illogical?

You could turn him over to Sulu.

}:)     [Then there'd be another one of those unfortunate transporter accidents ... ]

620 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:46:45pm

re: #618 MrSpock

Yeah- your 588 doesn't work quite like you'd desire because voting is a behavior. It's an act us *uppity women* had to fight to achieve.

621 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:47:13pm

re: #616 MrSpock

What about the states that have defined in their constitutions that marriage is a union between man and woman?

What if Californian's successfully overrides the judicial branch by adding an amendment to the state constitution to the same effect?

Should their / (our) legislative authority be overridden by activist judges pushing a socialist agenda?

Would you take the same view in an area that you disagreed with (gun rights, abortion, privacy laws, etc...)

That's the problem. You see it as an agenda. I don't.

I see it as two individuals making a mutual decision to get married.

622 NY Nana  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:47:31pm

Got to go to sleep...and in the words of our beloved Obi-Wan of blessed memory, play nice! I still miss him, especially the emails that a bunch of us old timers got...

I seriously wonder what he would think of some of the posts on this thread...

623 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:48:02pm

re: #614 Honorary Yooper

You're supposed to be logical here, Mr. Spock, so now act on your namesake. If you read my comment, you should notice that I say we already constrain marriage regarding incest and polygamy. Now, I never said anything about any taboo behaviour. Why should something someone has no choice over be taboo anyway? If they have no choice, should they be denyed the opportunity to be happy, as I should? And what can they screw up in marriage that we as straight folks haven't already screwed up anyway?

You strike me as an illgoical bigot.

And you remarkably cannot seem to understand a point.

1. What makes someone "happy" is not how we CONSTITUTIONALLY define RIGHTS!

2. Your comment about incest / polygamy actually proves my point. Homosexuality was defined as ILLEGAL previously (still is in some places, just not enforced). Why did this change? What is to say that this will not also change for incest / polygamy (or any other taboo behavior)?

624 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:48:08pm

re: #622 NY Nana

Good night, Nana!

625 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:48:19pm

I have yet to hear a coherent argument on how marriage between two same-sex partners will harm heterosexuals. The argument usually shifts into polygamy, incest, pedophilia, states rights and beyond. Why is there no answer for the first question?

626 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:48:54pm

re: #622 NY Nana

Good night, NY Nana!

627 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:51:22pm

re: #597 jaunte

"If gays have the same rights as straight people, there are no rules governing any human behavior."

Find the undistributed middle. It's a logic thing.

And apparently that is beyond him.

}:)     [Who knew Spock was such a hater?]

628 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:52:18pm

re: #623 MrSpock

And you remarkably cannot seem to understand a point.

1. What makes someone "happy" is not how we CONSTITUTIONALLY define RIGHTS!

2. Your comment about incest / polygamy actually proves my point. Homosexuality was defined as ILLEGAL previously (still is in some places, just not enforced). Why did this change? What is to say that this will not also change for incest / polygamy (or any other taboo behavior)?

1. I'm sorry, but I must have missed where it said marriage is a Constitutional right of any kind what-so-ever. BTW, the pursuit of happiness is in the Declaration of Independence if you're looking for it.

2. OK, but polygamy and incest are behaviours that are choices. Homosexuality and heterosexuality are not choices. They are in a person from day one, before birth, written into the very genetic code. You are comparing apples and oranges to prove your point. It's not working.

629 Throbert McGee  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:52:24pm

re: #617 Sharmuta

YES!

/Read up thread a little- start at about #569....

Will do -- just need to restart my cranky old computer. Back in a few minutes.

630 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:54:59pm

re: #621 gman

That's the problem. You see it as an agenda. I don't.

I see it as two individuals making a mutual decision to get married.

and what if the LAW says different?

People cannot just DO whatever they want (which is why we have laws...)

We all agree / disagree with some / most of them, but we still have to follow them... That's how our system works...

The law in California was ruled un-constitutional and overturned by the liberal judical branch.

The people are now pushing to have it added to the state constitution, which would effectively prevent the state judiciary branch from overriding it.

At what point does the efforts to override the will of the people (under the banner of "equal rights") become totalitarianism?

631 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:57:55pm

re: #630 MrSpock

So now gays are totalitarians?

632 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:58:48pm

/Personally- I think gays just don't want to sit in the back of the proverbial bus anymore.

633 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:58:51pm

re: #631 Sharmuta

So now gays are totalitarians?

Obviously, in MrSpock's world. So must I be one, if I think they should have equal treatment under the law, and not be punished for what is not a choice.

634 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:59:09pm

re: #620 Sharmuta

Yeah- your 588 doesn't work quite like you'd desire because voting is a behavior. It's an act us *uppity women* had to fight to achieve.

Sharmuta,

Are you implying that I think blacks or women shouldn't be able to vote?

And you didn't answer my question: Does associating a currently taboo behavior with the historical plight of women / blacks and their struggle for equality automatically give me a free pass to claim my behavior is a Right also?

635 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:59:19pm

re: #601 Kulhwch

We better be careful linking all these Monty Python clips. People might start to accuse us of trying to force a gay comedian lifestyle down their throats.

636 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 10:59:36pm

re: #634 MrSpock

Sharmuta,

Are you implying that I think blacks or women shouldn't be able to vote?

And you didn't answer my question: Does associating a currently taboo behavior with the historical plight of women / blacks and their struggle for equality automatically give me a free pass to claim my behavior is a Right also?

Are you claiming homosexuality is a choice?

637 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:02:40pm

re: #630 MrSpock

and what if the LAW says different?

People cannot just DO whatever they want (which is why we have laws...)

We all agree / disagree with some / most of them, but we still have to follow them... That's how our system works...

The law in California was ruled un-constitutional and overturned by the liberal judical branch.

The people are now pushing to have it added to the state constitution, which would effectively prevent the state judiciary branch from overriding it.

At what point does the efforts to override the will of the people (under the banner of "equal rights") become totalitarianism?

Again, you are evading the argument by saying gay marriage is outlawed because that is the will of the people. That is an observation not an argument.

638 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:03:54pm

Copperheads:

"There was an earthy quality in Voorhees, "the tall sycamore of the Wabash." On the stump his hot temper, passionate partisanship, and stirring eloquence made an irresistible appeal to the western Democracy. His bitter cries against protective tariffs and national banks, his intense race prejudice, his suspicion of the eastern Yankee, his devotion to personal liberty, his defense of the Constitution and State's rights faithfully reflected the views of his constituents. Like other Jacksonian agrarians, he resented the political and economic revolution then in progress. Voorhees idealized a way of life which he thought was being destroyed by the current rulers of his country. His bold protests against these dangerous trends made him the idol of the Democracy of the Wabash Valley."


[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

639 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:05:16pm

re: #625 jaunte

I have yet to hear a coherent argument on how marriage between two same-sex partners will harm heterosexuals. The argument usually shifts into polygamy, incest, pedophilia, states rights and beyond. Why is there no answer for the first question?

That's because your request is a misdirection. Any argument I offer, you will simply shoot down as bigoted or short-sighted or "illogical", and meanwhile you will completely ignore the white elephant staring you in the face...

IF you can define for me why we should continue to deny other behaviors, such as polygamy or incest, but allow homosexuality, then I will answer your question in return.

640 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:06:33pm

re: #639 MrSpock

Are you claiming homosexuality is a choice like incest and polygamy?

641 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:06:42pm

re: #637 gman

Again, you are evading the argument by saying gay marriage is outlawed because that is the will of the people. That is an observation not an argument.

He's also obfuscating and by calling this a "currently taboo behavior". Taboo to him, I guess- he's projecting his morality on people who have no choice in their sexual orientation.

642 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:08:20pm

re: #639 MrSpock

So you can't think of how gay marriage would harm heterosexuals without linking it to polygamy and incest.

643 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:08:25pm

re: #639 MrSpock

You sound sexy. Wanna Make out or something?
/C'mon, tap the secret code under the bathroom stall.

644 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:09:49pm

re: #641 Sharmuta

He's also obfuscating and by calling this a "currently taboo behavior". Taboo to him, I guess- he's projecting his morality on people who have no choice in their sexual orientation.

and moving the goal posts into other topics in order to avoid the issue at hand.

645 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:10:23pm

re: #618 MrSpock

See#588

Sorry, not being a party to your sloppy fallacy.  If you can't parse it, your problem.  You haters are on your own, but thanks for being yet another sterling example of bigotry.

}:)     [Methinks you doth protest too much ... ]

646 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:10:48pm

re: #639 MrSpock

You are the one with the logical fallacy here- you continue to ignore what Josephine said when she said you're confusing behavior with orientation.

647 joecitizen  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:11:57pm

re: #530 Syrah

I first came across LGF shortly after 911.

I didn't post or participate here. I was preoccupied with the almost totally unmoderated Flame Wars on the Yahoo BBS message boards.

I began to pay more attention to LGF when the Rathergate throbbing memo was posted. That simple bit of brilliance amazed me. Anyone could have done. But it was Charles that did it.

When the Yahoo Boards were put down, I decided to try to become a member here. It took awhile. Longer then I thought it would take, but eventually, I finally managed to catch an open registration and get in.

I like it here.

I am probably far more conservative in my religious and political philosophy than most of the posters here. I could be wrong, but that is my impression. I perceived that it was so before I joined up. I don't expect it to change.

It would be silly for me to think that I would find in LGF a mirror image of my religion, my values and my politics. That others here hold views wildly different from mine, is something that I can accept. I don't feel that I have to contend every difference nor do I feel that I have to win every argument. I don't have to agree with everybody here, and they don't have to agree with me.

My presence does not mean that the center here will shift to perfectly accommodate my worldview. I didn't sign up to change LGF. LGF is what it is. I like it. I think it is a blessing that it exists.

I am a little bothered by how many of my fellow Lizards are behaving of late.

This is not our house. We are guest here.

Like guests in someone else's house, we may have to accept that our host and his other guests hold opinions and views of the world that we do not. It behooves us out of plain good manners and rigorous intellectual honesty to consider whether or not it might be we that are in the wrong rather then reflexively striking back. It also might be wise to consider whether or not a particular point of contention is worth a no holds barred confrontation.

Sometimes we need to type slower, think more, and check our emotions. Not every battle must or even should be fought.

I think that the world is in for some very dark and terrible times. We will need all of the safe harbors, like LGF, that we can find.

Put on your thick Lizard Skins my compatriots. We will need them.

post of the week,at least!

648 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:13:25pm

Just wondering out loud, but why is it that some folks adhere to the fallacy that gay rights/gay marriage will open the flood gates to all manner of completely unrelated atrocities becoming legal, while at the same time refusing to see the very real dangers posed by the Discovery Institute's dishonest, political agenda in promoting ID as science in public schools?

I just don't get it.

649 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:15:51pm

re: #648 Slumbering Behemoth

Just wondering out loud, but why is it that some folks adhere to the fallacy that gay rights/gay marriage will open the flood gates to all manner of completely unrelated atrocities becoming legal, while at the same time refusing to see the very real dangers posed by the Discovery Institute's dishonest, political agenda in promoting ID as science in public schools?

I just don't get it.

attend a service at a fundamentalist church and you will see right away where this is all coming from. There's a lot of fear and paranoia being preached from the pulpit.

650 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:17:48pm

re: #649 gman

Do you ever hear an answer there to the question I posed in comment #625?

651 Honorary Yooper  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:17:57pm

re: #648 Slumbering Behemoth

Just wondering out loud, but why is it that some folks adhere to the fallacy that gay rights/gay marriage will open the flood gates to all manner of completely unrelated atrocities becoming legal, while at the same time refusing to see the very real dangers posed by the Discovery Institute's dishonest, political agenda in promoting ID as science in public schools?

I just don't get it.

I see a little bit of it in relation to each other. The same folks that fear the floodgates of hell being opened up (so to speak) also support the teaching of Intelligent Design/Creation Science. They wish to the rest of us to believe the Bible as literally as they do, never mind that most of us do not want to, and some of us consider them to be heretics for doing so. Some of them go so far as to want to apply the laws of Lectivius to all of us, never mind they were soley for the Levite priests.

652 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:23:15pm

re: #650 jaunte

Do you ever hear an answer there to the question I posed in comment #625?

No, and you will probably never get your answer because Mr.Spock has been scared into not thinking for himself. It's a shame.

653 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:24:04pm
re: #635 Slumbering Behemoth
re: #601 Kulhwch

We better be careful linking all these Monty Python clips. People might start to accuse us of trying to force a gay comedian lifestyle down their throats.

One wonders if he knows how homo-erotic he is when he says that.  Seems like he keeps saying it over and over and ...

}:)     [Okay, no more Monty Python ... ]

654 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:24:10pm

re: #636 Honorary Yooper

Are you claiming homosexuality is a choice?

What does it MATTER if its a choice or not?

Personal choice is not the sole arbiter of what people can and cannot do!

Your personal wishes are tempered by the dictates of the society in which you live.

You say same-sex marriage is a right, I say it should be up to the legislative process to decide. Fine, we disagree.

But when you circumvent THAT PROCESS (under whatever banner you claims gives you the right to do so), you infringe upon MY RIGHT to live in a representative democracy, because you have negated my sole ability to influence the political process.

The "Equal Rights" mantra of the same-sex marriage crowd is simply a way to bypass the debate and frame the issue in terms of civil rights instead of morality.

However, if you follow this line of reasoning, then ANY behavior becomes a potential civil right, and it is NOT unreasonable to expect currently taboo subjects to follow the same progressive path forward.

655 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:25:53pm

re: #649 gman

attend a service at a fundamentalist church and you will see right away where this is all coming from. There's a lot of fear and paranoia being preached from the pulpit.

Oh, no need. I have fundamentalists in my family, and have seen the occasional Pat Robertson program. I understand where it is coming from, I just can't fathom the thought processes behind it.

656 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:27:17pm

re: #652 gman

Sometimes I listen to Michael Savage ranting about the gay mafia, and I listen, thinking he might make a point, but the argument always slips over from gay marriage into polygamy, pedophilia and bestiality. I think he may just have found some good red meat to throw his listeners.

657 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:29:44pm

re: #637 gman

Again, you are evading the argument by saying gay marriage is outlawed because that is the will of the people. That is an observation not an argument.

what?

My entire argument is that gay marriage is outlawed BECAUSE it is the will of the people! The ability of people of the same sex to get married is NOT a Constitutional right. It is decided by the culture / community in which they live.

I disagree with it, but there's a lot of things I disagree with. If the same-sex crowd is able to win this at the ballot box, then more power to them. But they can't, so they use the courts to bypass the will of the people and use the canard of civil rights as a fig leaf to their schemes.

658 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:31:05pm

re: #654 MrSpock

Does this sound familiar if one word is changed?


"You say same-sex mixed marriage is a right, I say it should be up to the legislative process to decide. Fine, we disagree.

But when you circumvent THAT PROCESS (under whatever banner you claims gives you the right to do so), you infringe upon MY RIGHT to live in a representative democracy, because you have negated my sole ability to influence the political process.

The "Equal Rights" mantra of the same-sex mixed marriage crowd is simply a way to bypass the debate and frame the issue in terms of civil rights instead of morality.

The country had some arguments about that issue too.

659 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:31:42pm

re: #640 Honorary Yooper

Again what does choice have to do with it?

660 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:32:15pm

re: #646 Sharmuta

What does orientation have to do with anything?

661 wolfie  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:33:52pm

re: #649 gman

attend a service at a fundamentalist church and you will see right away where this is all coming from. There's a lot of fear and paranoia being preached from the pulpit.

I'm not sure what you mean by "fundamentalist." (Unfortunately, that's one of those words that is often used just to mean b-a-a-a-d.)
I have not had your experience at Baptist or Pentecostalist services I have occasionally attended. As a matter of fact, I find them a little too perky.

662 Sharmuta  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:34:58pm

re: #654 MrSpock

Take out a pen and write this down-

YOU CANNOT LEGISLATE MORALITY.

If we could- we wouldn't have jails full of law breakers, teenage pregnancy, and a whole host of other social ills.

What we do have in this country is individual rights, protected by law. When the rights of other are infringed upon, laws are being violated. This is why rape is a crime. This is why murder is a crime. This is why theft is a crime. The rights of the victim have been violated. Two consenting adults are not violating the other's individual rights- thus, homosexuality is not a crime. But we wouldn't know it from reading your posts on the subject.

663 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:37:50pm

re: #628 Honorary Yooper

1. I'm sorry, but I must have missed where it said marriage is a Constitutional right of any kind what-so-ever. BTW, the pursuit of happiness is in the Declaration of Independence if you're looking for it.

2. OK, but polygamy and incest are behaviours that are choices. Homosexuality and heterosexuality are not choices. They are in a person from day one, before birth, written into the very genetic code. You are comparing apples and oranges to prove your point. It's not working.

So let me see if I can break your logic down:

1. Our genes define who we are
2. As long as we don't harm anyone, we should be able to do anything we want?

Is this an accurate interpretation?

664 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:38:16pm

re: #650 jaunte

Do you ever hear an answer there to the question I posed in comment #625?

I'll answer your question when you answer mine...

665 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:38:57pm

Well, I guess the tussle with the fundamentalist gay basher will continue for a few hours before he withdrawls in claimed victory, etc.  Meanwhile, gotta get out and get some stuff done before bed.

}:)     [Goodnight one and all ... ]

666 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:39:23pm

re: #664 MrSpock

When I said "there" I was referring to gman's church. Not to you.

667 Kulhwch  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:39:31pm

Shoot, one short ...

}:)     [Now I really am out of here ... ]

668 Slumbering Behemoth  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:40:01pm

re: #653 Kulhwch

He he he. No, by all means, let's keep linking Monty Python clips. We should just be prepared for accusations is all I'm saying.

/a similar observation: there was a lot of bullshit complaining about Rudy at a costume party, completely ignoring comedic tradition vis a vis Uncle Milty

669 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:40:22pm

re: #655 Slumbering Behemoth

Oh, no need. I have fundamentalists in my family, and have seen the occasional Pat Robertson program. I understand where it is coming from, I just can't fathom the thought processes behind it.

I grew up in it (20 years). It's complete and total brainwashing and I have only recently (within the last couple of years) come to a healthier understanding of religion. Preachers at fundamentalist churches are salesmen that use fear to sell their product. Every Sunday, you get the "world might end tomorrow, so be baptized today" and the "devil is everywhere" fear messages that make you go home and call your non- christian family members and relatives to tell them they better be saved or face the eternal fires of hell. I remember calling my grandmother at 10 years of age, crying on the phone, asking her to be saved for fear she would go to hell.

670 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:42:19pm

re: #658 jaunte

Does this sound familiar if one word is changed?


The country had some arguments about that issue too.

I'm having a hard time understanding your point. would you please elucidate for me?

671 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:43:21pm

re: #670 MrSpock

You are making the same argument that opponents of mixed race marriage made when they opposed mixed race marriages.

672 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:44:11pm

re: #662 Sharmuta

Take out a pen and write this down-

YOU CANNOT LEGISLATE MORALITY.

If we could- we wouldn't have jails full of law breakers, teenage pregnancy, and a whole host of other social ills.

What we do have in this country is individual rights, protected by law. When the rights of other are infringed upon, laws are being violated. This is why rape is a crime. This is why murder is a crime. This is why theft is a crime. The rights of the victim have been violated. Two consenting adults are not violating the other's individual rights- thus, homosexuality is not a crime. But we wouldn't know it from reading your posts on the subject.

Check, so again to paraphrase, as long as it harm none, do as thou wilt?

673 MrSpock  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:49:13pm

re: #671 jaunte

You are making the same argument that opponents of mixed race marriage made when they opposed mixed race marriages.

So you think that because I'm opposed to gay marriage, that I'm the modern day equivalent of those people opposed to inter-racial marriage, and thus by extension a bigot / racist?

Is that correct?

674 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:50:39pm

re: #673 MrSpock

You are making the same argument that opponents of mixed race marriage made when they opposed mixed race marriages.

675 gman  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:52:09pm

re: #657 MrSpock

what?

My entire argument is that gay marriage is outlawed BECAUSE it is the will of the people! The ability of people of the same sex to get married is NOT a Constitutional right. It is decided by the culture / community in which they live.

I disagree with it, but there's a lot of things I disagree with. If the same-sex crowd is able to win this at the ballot box, then more power to them. But they can't, so they use the courts to bypass the will of the people and use the canard of civil rights as a fig leaf to their schemes.

Again, this is an observation not an argument. If I said that most people in country x said behavior y was OK and the courts in country x had made it law, would that be a rational argument for behavior y. Of course not, but that is what you have presented to us here.

676 jaunte  Sat, Jun 21, 2008 11:54:37pm
Donatists and Catholics agreed that the power of the Holy Spirit is
conveyed to the believer through the sacraments, which are administered
by the church through the clergy. The Donatists alleged, however, that
the sacraments require for their validity a ministry undefiled by serious sin; for the Spirit departs from the sinner, who cannot therefore "confer what he does not possess." Augustine replied that the sacraments convey the Spirit in virtue of Christ's ordinance alone and that this validity is church's unity depends on the Spirit's supreme gift of charity, of which schism is the denial. Unfortunately, Augustine, who had for long opposed the use of any means but persuasion to end the schism, eventually was induced to approve the enforcement of legal penalties upon the schismatics, in the interest, as he believed, of the many whose fear of Donatist violence had kept them from returning to the church. His famous saying, "Love, and do what thou wilt," was in fact a defense of compulsion in the service of charity.


[Link: nzr.mvnu.edu...]

677 Throbert McGee  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:00:32am

Hi, again, Sharmuta. Sorry it took so long -- I also had to prep some dough for some baking I'm doing in the morning.

I've read through the thread, and I'm going to have to take a raincheck on getting involved with this tonight. The whole argle-bargle with people that I thought I knew at DL has made me more tired than I normally would be on a Saturday night. And tomorrow I've got to get up earlier than a heathen normally does on a Sunday, since my sister and I will be spending some quality time with Mom, who's in from out of town. (Hence the a.m. baking.)

But I would definitely be happy to throw in my 2¢ on discussions about evolutionary biology or homosexuality another day, since as I mentioned on another thread, these are both areas in which I have some knowledge. Only a good layman's grasp of EB, since biology was one of my college majors -- but years of empirical field research and practical lab work in (male) homosexuality. And by "empirical field research" I of course mean "in bars with names like The Cockpit"; and by "practical lab work" I mean "under the sheets."

;-)

P.S. MrSpock (and what an ambitious screen-name, by the way!) should consider himself warned that when I throw in my 2¢, I prefer to use Yap Island currency.

678 MrSpock  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:01:00am

re: #589 Sharmuta

To answer this question- to tell two adults genuinely in love that they are wrong is something I would never do.

So to use this logic, a full-grown man can sleep with his mother, and there is nothing wrong with it?

679 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:04:09am

re: #678 MrSpock

So to use this logic, a full-grown man can sleep with his mother, and there is nothing wrong with it?

You know full well what Sharm meant.

680 Mich-again  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:05:20am

How does a science teacher last 21 years spouting that bullshit. WTF? He shouldn't have made it to 21 days.

681 Throbert McGee  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:09:49am

P.S. I don't totally disagree with all of the points that MrSpock is making -- my views on issues like same-sex marriage and Don't Ask, Don't Tell are kinda complicated, and I'm often at odds with what The Gay Community tends to think on these and other issues.

Although my basic position could be summed up as: "Once I've earned your respect as a man, I trust that as a rational person, you will not lose any of that respect for me just because I also happen to be one of those men who smokes sausage." (And a corollary of that is, "Just because you've come to respect me doesn't mean that I ask you to respect every other homo who walks through the door. Let 'em f*cking earn it.")

682 MrSpock  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:18:47am

re: #re: #642 jaunte

So you can't think of how gay marriage would harm heterosexuals without linking it to polygamy and incest.

627 Kulhwch

And apparently that is beyond him.

}:)     [Who knew Spock was such a hater?]

Ok juante,

you refuse to answer my question, but I will answer yours.

Morality does not exist in a vacuum.

A nation, people, culture is defined by its morality.

This country gets more and more progressive every day.

Progressivism is the rallying cry used by liberals / socialists to justify every broken social engineering experiment they have foisted on us over the last 50 years, and they never take ownership of their mistakes.

Same-sex marriage is just one front in the assault on traditional American values.

The ultimate goal is remove ANY ability to say that ANYTHING is wrong, by saying that everything is a right. It is a linchpin of the Communist manifesto.

This is their goal because it is easier to conquer a people when they have nothing on which to stand (you don't fight as hard to defend your way of life if all ways of life are equal).

The Marxist / Socialists have been hammering away a long time, and their work is mostly complete.

The same way we laugh and mock the Europeans for their multi-culturalism run amok, and the same way we saddened by the rise of Islamofacism and Europe's apparent inablity to deal with it in an effective manner, is just a sign of where America will be in another 20 years.

I obviously made a mistake by trying to start a rational debate here...

I apologize for wasting anyones time... I'll not speak up again...

683 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:26:32am

re: #682 MrSpock

Same-sex marriage is just one front in the assault on traditional American values.

Jaunte already addressed this by telling you that this line of reasoning was used in the past to argue against mixed race marriages.

684 Slumbering Behemoth  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:34:34am

re: #669 gman

When I was a young lad the fundamentalists in my family were spending a lot of effort on getting to me. Gave me a lot of tracts and comic books from Jack Chick *spit*. Though I was young, I was still sharp enough not to be influenced by such trooferistic insanity. Still, it is a sad day in a young boy's life when he realizes he's got more sense than his elders.

For a while they had a lot of influence on my poor mother trying to raise me and my brother all by herself. They took advantage of her uncertainty and confusion at that time. It was a very difficult and dark period for us, with the threat of Lucy lurking in all things.

Every casual interest of mine was a satanic influence, everything not directly from the fundamentalist world view was a doorway to demonic possession. Art, literature, music, movies, hobbies, you name it; if it did not come with the fundamentalist seal of approval it was evil, and sure to send me to an eternity of torment and hellfire.

Thankfully, that sort of nonsense is now ancient history in my family.

685 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:44:13am

re: #684 Slumbering Behemoth

When I was a young lad the fundamentalists in my family were spending a lot of effort on getting to me. Gave me a lot of tracts and comic books from Jack Chick *spit*. Though I was young, I was still sharp enough not to be influenced by such trooferistic insanity. Still, it is a sad day in a young boy's life when he realizes he's got more sense than his elders.

For a while they had a lot of influence on my poor mother trying to raise me and my brother all by herself. They took advantage of her uncertainty and confusion at that time. It was a very difficult and dark period for us, with the threat of Lucy lurking in all things.

Every casual interest of mine was a satanic influence, everything not directly from the fundamentalist world view was a doorway to demonic possession. Art, literature, music, movies, hobbies, you name it; if it did not come with the fundamentalist seal of approval it was evil, and sure to send me to an eternity of torment and hellfire.

Thankfully, that sort of nonsense is now ancient history in my family.

My mother also raised me and my brothers and sisters by herself and I think she joined the church more for the social aspect than anything else.
I feel like I've come a long ways since those days, but it sure has been a struggle to rid myself of the guilt you feel when everything around you, even your inner thoughts, are considered sinful.

686 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:44:50am

G'night all

687 Slumbering Behemoth  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:20:50am

re: #645 Kulhwch

Sorry, not being a party to your sloppy fallacy.  If you can't parse it, your problem.  You haters are on your own, but thanks for being yet another sterling example of bigotry.

}:)     [Methinks you doth protest too much ... ]

I finally got around to watching that clip. The first thing that jumped out at me was the abundance of head scarves on the women. Wow.

Sick, twisted freaks. They tie Old Glory to their feet so that they might drag it about in the dirt, much in they way of Ayers. They claim that Bush was deceived by God to go to war. That every U.S. soldier deserves to die in this conflict because they are fighting for a country of 'fag enablers'.

Words cannot express my anger towards this cult.

688 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:29:41am

re: #684 Slumbering Behemoth

re: #685 gman

I am so sorry to hear you had such a negative experience with 'religion'. I grew up Roman Catholic in a most Catholic country in Europe. Overall I thought it was a positive experience in my life. It gave me a moral compass, what is right and what is wrong.

I moved to America with mom and I was with Catholic church for quite a few years, even during high school, where doubts started to creep in...

It was in the last year of high school that I started to get interested in religion again thanks to a friend who encouraged me to read the Bible on my own...the paraphrased version called the Living Bible.

Two months after high school graduation I was in a special weekend retreat in the basement of my local Catholic school when I experienced something that changed my life. I met the living Christ in the Chapel. I was not the only one that experienced that. It was somewhat like what Saul experienced on the Road to Damascus, but I did not fall from the horse.

It was then that my religious belief not longer became just a 'belief' but a relationship with G-d. G-d was not longer a 'theory' but a reality.

All these happened with mewithin the Catholic church!

689 Slumbering Behemoth  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 2:11:31am

re: #688 psaturn

It wasn't the 'religion', per se, but the humanistic interpretation thereof that caused the negative experience.

Those who are indoctrinated into looking for a demonic influence in every aspect of life will find it wherever they see fit. Tis a dishonest, dark age mentality.

690 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 5:37:11am

re: #430 OldLineTexan

re: #431 Sharmuta

You have missed many of the points. I would have thought Lizards capable of extending my arguments - which, by the way, were not so much assertions as questions.

1. Conservatives should be consistent. In the McDonalds coffee case, the lady who was victim was not voluntary, had massive injuries which will give pain for life, had many operations, and initially wanted only medical expenses.

In this teenager's case, he had no permanent injuries, his injuries healed in 3 weeks, he needed no operations, and his participation may have been voluntary.

If the McDonald's case is termed frivolous given the much greater injury, then why shouldn't the teenagers's case be termed frivolous?

2. "Assault and battery"? Assault and battery are criminal charges. The articles say nothing about criminal charges against the teacher. This is another reason I suspect voluntary tomfoolery. One poster above even mentioned doing the same (macho playing with a generator) with other boys.

3. The parents cannot bring criminal suit, so their suit is civil and thus for money. Ordinarily conservatives discourage this sort of thing. Also, such suits must show damage. Unless they want to begin "irreparable psychological damage" nonsense, they can't show much injury if the injury healed quickly. Such a quickly-healed injury warrants little in the way of damage award, even in run-of-the-mill personal injury suits.

4. Are you sure you want to piggyback on liberals' blowing a minor incident (poor judgment by a conservative teacher) out of proportion?

5. In the Rodney King case, the jury correctly decided certain police actions not rising to the level of criminal assault. Such a decision still leaves the door wide open for departmental discipline. Similarly, if the teenager and teacher engaged in voluntary, macho tomfoolery, then lawsuits are not in order, and probably not even firing, just suspension or other discipline for the teacher.

6. I suspect the school board in this case is mis-using a minor incident of mis-judgment (tomfoolery) to get rid of a pesky, conservative, believing teacher. That's wrong. If they want to get rid of a believing teacher, the school board should state its reasons honestly.

7. This sets a dangerous precedent. Any school board which dislikes Christians need only now find some other excuse, which isn't hard - everyone makes a mistake occasionally.

691 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:04:28am

re: #428 InternationalObserver

I must add, the negative recs on my post #428 have made me reassess my opinion of Lizards.

The issues I raised were entirely valid ones of the need for conservatives to apply conservative principles consistently. The hysterical reaction (and rush to lawsuit) in response to tomfoolery, is unwarranted.

Apparently, Charles is a very smart cookie, but some of his followers here are (a) fools and (b) intellectual non-entities and (c) incapable of apply conservative principles consistently.

692 Nemesis6  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:55:05am

re: #691 InternationalObserver

Don't take it seriously, it varies. Sometimes all it takes is one minus mark, and people will instinctively give you more, sometimes.

But I'd say it's because you didn't address that he spouted that crap in his classroom, that's what really matters here. The cross burning thing is just supplemental evidence of his... inapropriate "theism".

693 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:55:54am

Here are some additional questions. Without clear answers to them, Texan's & Sharmuta's (and others') condemnations of the teacher are a rush to judgment:

Did he simply let the Bible sit on his desk? Or did he actively proselytise? Those are very different. Having a Bible is his right. Stating his opinion is his right. Forcing students to adopt his opinions, is wrong.

How exactly did he "teach" creationism? Did he mention it as an alternative and encourage the students to openly debate both sides? Or instead did he try to force the students to approve it? These are very different.

Did he down-grade the students who challenged him? If yes, fire him. If no, then he doesn't deserve to be fired on "preaching" grounds.

I remember openly conservative/liberal teachers who were delighted to be challenged by the opposite side, placing strongest emphasis on the students' thinking for themselves. That's completely different from a teacher who tries to force students to adopt his views.

That's why it's relevant to ask exactly what Freshwater did, before rushing to judgment. Openly stating one's views is different from trying to force students to adopt thse views.

Many chemistry teachers demonstrate to students how a little contact with silver nitrate will turn skin black. Whether they demonstrate on themselves or on a student volunteer, only crazed environmentalists think 1 square millimeter of stain harmful, and it wears off in a few weeks. Did Freshwater ask for volunteers? Or did he in any way use physical force? The two situations are extremely different.

If he asked for volunteers, he just deserves a reprimand. If he used force, then he should indeed be fired.

More details are needed. Those here rushing to judgment, are displaying just as poor judgment as the teacher.

Shug #6 is correct. More investigation is needed before any conclusions can be drawn.

694 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:12:02am

re: #692 Nemesis6

you didn't address that he spouted that crap in his classroom, that's what really matters here. The cross burning thing is just supplemental evidence of his...inapropriate "theism".

Excuse me, nobody here has addressed what he did or did not say exactly, because the articles haven't addressed it. The articles have not specified enough - exactly what, when, how.

A teacher does not give up Constitutional rights. He had the right to say he believes in God and in ID. He may even have that right in the classroom. He does not have the right to require the students to agree. The "news" articles do not give enough detail to discern into which case he falls.

Your reference to "cross burning" is malicious and would be thrown out of any court-room because of its KKK connotations. In point of fact, it's not even clear he intended to form a cross rather than just the image of the electrode. Once again, the information we have is insufficient, yet you are rushing to judgment.

For the record, a great number of teenage science enthusiasts try such tomfoolery with electrodes.

Thank you for educating me. I'm not an evangelical, but I now understand why the evangelicals may be paranoid. The rush to judgment in this thread is grotesque.

695 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:19:11am

re: #691 InternationalObserver

I must add, the negative recs on my post #428 have made me reassess my opinion of Lizards.

The issues I raised were entirely valid ones of the need for conservatives to apply conservative principles consistently. The hysterical reaction (and rush to lawsuit) in response to tomfoolery, is unwarranted.

Apparently, Charles is a very smart cookie, but some of his followers here are (a) fools and (b) intellectual non-entities and (c) incapable of apply conservative principles consistently.

You were dinged down because people disagree with you. Not everyone believes like you that this teacher is a "pesky, conservative, believing teacher." Many posters have stated that an extreme compulsion to tell others about religion, even when it is not appropriate in a classroom setting, could be an indicator of mental illness. I also lean in that direction. Obviously, your definition of "conservative" is different than mine and others here. I consider him "extreme." Your insinuation that we are "followers" of Charles is a distortion caused by the blinders you are wearing. We are independent thinkers on this site and the number of heated discussions on this site should be just one indicator that we are not "followers."

696 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:27:15am

re: #694 InternationalObserver

The rush to judgment in this thread is grotesque.

The size of your blinders is "grotesque"

Here again is the excerpt from the top of this thread:

The Mount Vernon School Board passed a resolution to terminate the employment of John Freshwater, an eighth-grade science teacher for the past 21 years.

Freshwater, according to an independent report, used an electrostatic device to mark a cross on the arm of one of his students, causing pain to the student the night of the incident and leaving a mark that lasted for approximately three weeks.

According to the Ohio Department of Education, the student’s family has filed a lawsuit.

Freshwater was also reprimanded several times for refusing to move his Bible from his classroom desk and teaching creationism alongside evolution, according to the 15-page independent report. The report also cites evidence that Mr. Freshwater told his students that “science is wrong because the Bible states that homosexuality is a sin and so anyone who is gay chooses to be gay and is therefore a sinner.”

The excerpt cites 4 examples of conduct considered to be inappropriate in the classroom from a 15- page independent report. You keep bringing up examples one at a time, out of context.

697 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:44:25am

re: #695 gman

You were dinged down because people disagree with you.

Disagree with what? You, and they, didn't read carefully. I didn't assert much definitively. I said the matter not cut-and-dried. For example, there is indeed an issue of frivolous suit.

Not everyone believes like you that this teacher is a "pesky, conservative, believing teacher."

Excuse me, you are rushing to judgment like everyone else here. I did not say he is just a pesky, conservative, believing teacher. I raised the issue that the descriptions thus far don't exclude that.

Many posters have stated

What posters here state is irrelevant as they have not enough information to tell if it applies to the case.

an extreme compulsion to tell others about religion, even when it is not appropriate in a classroom setting, could be an indicator of mental illness.

You hedged with "could be". Once again, you are proving my point- rushing to judgment. Furthermore, the articles haven't even made clear "classroom setting". Did he mention this material in breaks? In after-class chatting with students? In formal papers or exams? These are all different situations, and neither you nor the others here have shown grounds for your conclusions. The articles are just too ambiguous.

Obviously, your definition of "conservative" is different than mine and others here.


You're making unwarranted assumptions. I did not state any definition of conservative. I merely raised two obvious issues (1) Conservatives generally oppose litigiousness - so why support it here? (2) Is a secular, liberal school board just making a mountain from a molehill, to create an excuse to get rid of a conservative, evangelical teacher? That's a bad precendent.

Moreover, the articles do not show the school board having first implemented more reasonable discipline - reporting to a mentor, suspension, etc.

It sounds as if they don't like the fellow because he is eccentic and evangelical. It is dangerous to free speech to allow the school board to simply fire him without more detailed information and justification.

There may be a case for firing him, but the articles don't make it.

I consider him "extreme."

Your reaching that conclusion on insufficient grounds, is extreme.

Your insinuation that we are "followers" of Charles is a distortion caused by the blinders you are wearing. We are independent thinkers on this site and the number of heated discussions on this site should be just one indicator that we are not "followers."

You are reading too much into the word. Most people here (including myself) are fans of Charles. My point was simply that, on this thread, his fans seem far less astute than Charles himself.

698 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:55:38am
I suspect the school board in this case is mis-using a minor incident of mis-judgment (tomfoolery) to get rid of a pesky, conservative, believing teacher

These were your words even after seeing the examples in the report. I don't know what else to say to you since you are not being consistent with your reasoning (the very thing you accuse some posters here of doing). Again, if an independent report uncovers at least 4 examples of inappropriate conduct at school and you still need more information to clear things up then once again I would recommend that you start working on getting those blinders off.

699 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:00:28am

re: #696 gman

Once again, you didn't read my posts carefully, nor the articles carefully. All the examples are ambiguous, and mountains out of molelhills. (I've seen similar myself in many trumped-up situations.)

Let's look at each item you brought up:

1. Electrostatic device. Yes, we've all played around with wave generators. And many teenage boys dare each other with generators, Bunson burners, etc. Was this an instance of (as I keep asking) tomfoolery? Or instead of deliberate force, which is a very different matter? We aren't told. Schools are political, and anyone can trump up any incident into far more than it was.

For example, the article said the parents claimed the boy had pain that evening. (a) They may be lying. (b) Even if they are not, they omitted pain in any following day. That means it was a very minor injury. I've had splinters and paper cuts painful for more than one day.

2. Filing of a lawsuit. I remind you that (a) anybody can file a lawsuit about anything (b) filing isn't conviction (c) most conservatives are sceptical of proliferating personal injury lawsuits.

3. You keep repeating "classroom". But I have seen no details. As I asked before, was it in after-class chatting? Or was it instead taught as something the students had to repeat on a test? These are very different situations, and I see nothing in the articles allowing reliable differentiation.

4. Teachers do not abandon their first-amendment rights. If he mentioned religious concepts to the students clearly as just opinion, then he may be within his rights.

5. You ignored my point of the similarity to political opinion. Many teachers mention their political opinion in the classroom, but encourage students to challenge it. Fostering debate is not the same as imposing one's opinion.

6.

The excerpt cites 4 examples of conduct considered to be inappropriate in the classroom from a 15- page independent report.

Do you really think anything in liberal academia "independent" when given the opportunity to censure a conservative?

I repeat that this is a rush to judgment. Every accused has the right to be presumed innocent and to have accusations treated with scepticism.

More details are needed, but this case has all the earmarks of a witch hunt against a teacher simply for eccentricity and religiosity.

No, I'm not religious myself. Just wary of liberal, small-town politics.

700 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:18:05am

Here's an article about students defending the teacher:

Mount Vernon Bible flap
Students back defiant teacher
Saturday, April 19, 2008 3:06 AM
By Alayna DeMartini

THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
WBNS-10TV video

Teacher defends Bible MOUNT VERNON, Ohio -- They painted crosses on white T-shirts and wore them to school yesterday. They carried Bibles and put them on their desks.

Some students at Mount Vernon Middle and High schools want everyone to know they support a science teacher who has refused to remove a Bible from his classroom desk.

Students cheered and offered high-fives to Middle School teacher John Freshwater when he showed up yesterday at a student-organized rally in his honor.

More at:
[Link: www.dispatch.com...]

Here's an article critical of the teacher, which nevertheless contains one line of praise:

"In his evaluations through the 21 years he's worked for the district, Freshwater has drawn consistent praise for his strong rapport with students, broad knowledge of his subject matter and engaging teaching style."

[Link: scienceblogs.com...]

This all supports my contentions that (1) the matter isn't cut-and-dried (2) local personal politics may be involved (3) there has been a rush to judgment on this thread (4) most likely he deserves crticicism and discipline but not firing.

701 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:27:36am

Hmm- conservative values- like respecting the family, upholding the Constitution, and personal responsibility?

This teacher has no right to preach to his students about his religious beliefs. That is a parent's job. As other teachers pointed out up thread, this teacher is supposed to stick to the curriculum and not impose his own.

We have in the Constitution what is known as the Establishment Clause. The ID movement is seeking to toss the EC on it's head. As a Conservative- I oppose this. Also- under the Constitution, people have the right to have their grievances addressed. Comparing child abuse to McDonald's coffee in the lap is a gross analogy.

As a conservative- I also believe in personal responsibility. This teacher is not taking responsibility for his actions- he's seeking to get a hearing to retain his job. There have been complaints about this man for 11 years- instead of taking responsibility for himself and his actions, and realizing he should control himself, he's continued on his merry way, and now feels he's entitled to keep his job- even after he violated a student. I really don't care if the student agreed to have this devise placed on his arm- he's a minor. There's a reason we feel adulthood begins at a certain age- an age this child had not yet attained. The responsibility in this case lies with the adult- the teacher, yet you want to fault (?) the parents for following through with their Constitutional right to see that this man is held responsible for his actions? Perhaps if you'd left out "frivolous" the response you would have received would be different than the one you got, because I don't see this as "frivolous".

702 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:42:53am

It didn't even occur to me that there are actually people who will defend this teacher.

Just amazing.

703 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:52:12am

More information indicates Freshwater was being flexible and apparently had a right to have the Bible:

Jennifer Klintworth, who was a student in Freshwater's class about 15 years ago, said the teacher always had religious items present in his classrooms.

"Never once do I ever remember him saying anything to me, ever trying to push his values on to me, ever trying to preach to me," Klintworth said. "Frankly, at that time, I would have said, "I don't want to hear that.'"

According to the Ohio Department of Education, there is no state rule or policy on religious articles.

Freshwater made it clear on Wednesday that he would remove all items except the Bible on his desk.

Stone said the district did not mind if Freshwater kept the Bible, but he said legal counsel urged some changes.

[Link: www.10tv.com...]

704 uptight  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:57:08am

re: #640 Honorary Yooper

Are you claiming homosexuality is a choice like incest and polygamy?

homosexuality is as much a choice as heterosexuality

you are attracted to what you are attracted to - it's not a "choice" - it's just how you feel

whether you act on it is a choice

705 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:23:49am

Charles, I'm disappointed in you.

First, I'm not defending him. I'm an atheist. Instead, I am criticising a rush to judgment on the basis of ambiguous information. Read the links I gave. The situation is ambiguous and impossible to characterise without further detail, which - if the school board is wise - it will allow to be fully discussed in a hearing.

Look at the link I just gave in which student Jennifer Klintworth stated (and may end up doing so in a court case) that Freshwater never pushed religion on her.

Second, one of my links shows Freshwater may be on solid legal ground in keeping the Bible.

Third, I have myself played with generators and Tesla coils. A lot of science students do. We burn ourselves occasionally, slightly, both in electrical experiments and in chemical experiments. Sometimes, it's minor marking on purpose, just as kids play with tattoos. NOT ONE PERSON has answered my question of whether the generator marks on the boy's arm were the result of such experimentation and fooling-around which got carried away, or were instead by force. There is a big difference, both morally and legally.

706 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:25:29am

Sharmuta, you read NOT ONE WORD of what I said.

First, the student I cited said Freshwater did NOT preach in class. The student knew him religious but she said he did NOT force his views on them. I am shocked that you have no respect for the teacher's constitutional right to have a view and to state it, and that you mis-characterise it as "preaching". (This is why, before researching, I had already asked for more details of exactly what the teacher had done. The circumstances matter. Talking about religion is not necessarily preaching.)

Second, you beg the question when you call the arm marking "child abuse". The "child" may have been a teen capable of thinking for himself, and the marking may have been tomfoolery voluntarily engaged in by the teenager. Do you call it "child abuse" when a teenager skins his knee in high school baseball or football? We cannot differentiate between the two possibilities - Freshwater abusing the boy, or Freshwater and the boy just fooling around - until we know the details, particularly whether or not coercion were involved.

Third, you're apparently ignorant of the law. Damages in a suit are dependent on the degree of injury. The McDonalds victim will never heal, and so she got significant damages. But the student healed in a few weeks, and no mention was made of any incapacity whatsoever during those weeks - so he is unlikely to get significant damages, perhaps just doctor's bills, which the teacher might well cover voluntarily if asked without legal intervention. That's why I question whether the matter belongs in court. It is indeed inconsistent for anti-litigation conservatives to want to see this in court, but not McDonalds.

Your droning on and on about "personal responsibility" is ambiguous as well. If your neighbour socks you for putting a leaf on his lawn, will you say it's your own fault and you should accept "personal responsibility" for your situation? "Personal responsibility" is a b.s. phrase because it becomes an indeterminate catch-all for whatever you want it to mean.

Finally, your understanding of the Establishment Clause is flawed. If you look at my links you will see that the teacher has a right to have his Bible on the desk in his classroom. The school board may want him to hide it in certain circumstances, but there seems no case law on it.

Excuse me, but everyone here seems like a bunch of liberals rushing to beat up on a religious guy. You are all (a) rushing to judgment and (b) mis-stating the law and (c) wanting to deprive the guy of core rights just because you disagree with him.

If the teacher can show the marking incident voluntary, the teacher stands a good chance of winning two court cases - as defendant against the parents, and as plaintiff against the schools.

Good job, Lizards. Your rush to judgment has made me, an atheist, sympathetic to an evagelical.

707 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:30:05am

Report reveals religion was taught | Mountvernonnews.com

The key findings of the report are quoted below.

Mr. Freshwater did burn a cross onto the complaining family’s child’s arm using an electrostatic device not designed for that purpose. While there did not appear to be any intent by Mr. Freshwater to cause injury to any student, he was not using the device for its intended purpose. Contrary to Mr. Freshwater’s statement he simply made an “X” not a “cross,” all of the students described the marking as a “cross” and the pictures provided depict a “cross.”

The Ten Commandments together with other posters of a religious nature were posted in Mr. Freshwater’s classroom. Most were removed after Mr. White’s letter of April 14, 2008, but at least one poster remained which Mr. Freshwater was again instructed to remove on April 16, 2008, but did not do so.

Several Bibles were kept in Mr. Freshwater’s classroom including his personal Bible on his desk and one he checked out of the library placed on the lab table near the desk. Other Bibles that had been maintained in the room were removed by the time the investigators viewed Mr. Freshwater’s room.

Mr. Freshwater engaged in teaching of a religious nature, teaching creationism and related theories and calling evolution into question. He had other materials in his classroom that could be used for that purpose.

Mr. Freshwater engaged in prayer during FCA meetings in violation of the district’s legal obligations for monitoring such organizations.

Mr. Freshwater participated and possibly led a prayer during an FCA meeting that concerned a guest speaker’s health. There is no conclusion as to whether such prayer was a “healing” prayer.

There is no evidence Mr. Freshwater violated the district’s permission slip policy.

There is no evidence Mr. Freshwater made statements about FCA members “being the saved ones” nor was there any corroboration to the allegation Mr. Freshwater gave FCA members Bibles for them to distribute. He did have two boxes of Bibles in the back of his room.

Mr. Freshwater gave an extra credit assignment for students to view the movie “Expelled” which does involve intelligent design.

708 Kulhwch  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:31:33am

re: #668 Slumbering Behemoth

He he he. No, by all means, let's keep linking Monty Python clips. We should just be prepared for accusations is all I'm saying.

/a similar observation: there was a lot of bullshit complaining about Rudy at a costume party, completely ignoring comedic tradition vis a vis Uncle Milty

Ah, okay, I misunderstood.  As one who cannot be harmed by such accusations, and liking Monty Python greatly, I agree to continue but be prepared.

}:)     [There's always the classic, after all ... ]

709 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:35:49am

re: #707 Charles

Mr. Freshwater gave an extra credit assignment for students to view the movie “Expelled” which does involve intelligent design.


...and now the game begins. That's the whole purpose of making that movie. Once it comes out on DVD nutcases are going to be distributing it to their students in order to get fired and file lawsuits. It's going to get very expensive.

710 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:36:28am

re: #706 InternationalObserver

Your droning on and on about "personal responsibility" is ambiguous as well. If your neighbour socks you for putting a leaf on his lawn, will you say it's your own fault and you should accept "personal responsibility" for your situation?

No- that's called assault. Now- if my neighbor wants to call the cops and press charges- I'm sure they'd be laughed at, but they can certainly try it. Yet another gross analogy.

"Personal responsibility" is a b.s. phrase because it becomes an indeterminate catch-all for whatever you want it to mean.

And you call yourself a conservative? Better let the GOP know they espouse a "BS phrase" before they continue to make jack-asses of themselves to the American public.

711 Kulhwch  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:39:35am

re: #687 Slumbering Behemoth

Yeah, Fred Phelps and his whelps are all a bunch of work.  It was the first time I ever felt dirty just watching a video.

}:)     [Thankfully we've got a Gathering of Eagles to combat them ... ]

712 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:42:20am

It sure got quiet in here.

713 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:54:34am

Charles, rearding each of your points:

Bibles: I have already given you a news article in which the School Board itself says Bibles are okay.

FCA: This seems a separate religious organisation and does not seem relevant to the classroom or to the issue.

Posters in the classroom: As he claimed (and his lawyer will claim in court), he removed most religious materials when told to do so. Apparently he left one poster. BFD. I don't think a 21-year teacher, deemed knowledgable and competent and well-like and effective by the school board's own reviews, should be fired over one poster.

Movie: He should not have given extra credit for seeing the movie, but rather extra credit for any essay using knowledge of science to either refute or support the movie.

Ben Stein is eccentric but no nut. Any movie of his is worth seeing. That said, the teacher should not have one-sidedly given credit for seeing the movie, but instead offered extra credit for essays discussing evolution-vs-creation on the basis of that movie or any other. Pushing a viewpoint is bad, but it is entirely desirable to promote thought and discussion by having students write essays, and grading the essays not on opinion but instead on students' knowledge of both sides, depth of expression, adducing good arguments, etc.

By the way, I think the teacher can challenge the independence of the report. Who paid for it? The school board? Then it's not independent. I expect the courts will apppoint a third party.

Also, the report included the following:

there did not appear to be any intent by Mr. Freshwater to cause injury to any student


[Link: cafephilos.wordpress.com...]

So, the sum total of the charges against the teacher may turn out to be: (1) He and a student did some unwise but voluntary fooling-around with a generator. (2) He didn't take down a poster fast enough. (3) He mis-judged one movie assignment, giving credit for seeing it rather than for (say) essays refuting or supporting it.

That's enough for criticism or discipline, but far from enough grounds to fire a well-liked, competent, effective, 21-year teacher. Once again, if the marking incident were voluntary, I think there's a good possibility of his winning a wrongful dismissal suit.

Basically, he's religious, and some people don't like that. I'm not religious, but I defend his right to be so. Cf. Patrick Henry & Voltaire, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

714 Kulhwch  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:55:52am

re: #712 Charles

That's the problem early on a Sunday morning.  Try to get a little action and people are either still sleeping or off at church.

}:)     [I'm sure it'll heat up before too long, though.]

715 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:03:23am

re: #682 MrSpock

"I obviously made a mistake by trying to start a rational debate here."

If you are speaking of this particular discussion on this particular night.......
You're quite right, you bigot, hater, gay-basher, Fred Phelps disciple, Copperhead racist traitor, you!

My 13 yr old could have done a far better job of addressing your points and debating them.

716 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:04:47am

re: #713 InternationalObserver

From your own link -- who are these people supporting Freshwater?

The Firing of John Freshwater.

Apparently among his most ardent supporters are the members of a local Christian group that calls itself "Minutemen United", and who envision themselves as existing "... to wage war against a culture of God-haters".

717 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:11:07am

re: #706 InternationalObserver

"The circumstances matter".

Yes, of course they do. Had he done what he did in a Sunday School class, then none of this would matter. However, he did what he did, repeatedly, in a public high school. That's my dime he's using and he has zero right to be using any public money in which to evangelize those students.

"Second, you beg the question when you call the arm marking "child abuse".

Sharmuta is correct. It is child abuse. Further, it is a misuse of his authority. You may think students were free to disagree with him. That would be an incorrect assumption. First, there is the matter of peer pressure. Second, the worry that their grades would suffer if any student told him that his experiment violated the law and they would report him. Third, a teacher/student relationship is not a relationship among equals. That is why sexual harassment by a teacher against a student is treated very seriously even at the college level.

"But the student healed in a few weeks, and no mention was made of any incapacity whatsoever during those weeks - so he is unlikely to get significant damages, perhaps just doctor's bills, which the teacher might well cover voluntarily if asked without legal intervention."

You don't know what you re talking about. The teacher will be sued and the school board will be sued. If you think this is going to be limited to a few hundred dollars, then remind me never to use you as my lawyer.

"If the teacher can show the marking incident voluntary..."

His position of authority makes this claim laughable.

718 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:12:18am

Sharmuta, you didn't understand my point - it was the opposite of your assumption. Namely, since in the hypothetical example you put the leaf on your neighbour's lawn, one could assert that "personal responsibility" means your accepting getting socked as a result of your own unwise action. You put the leaf on your neighbour's lawn, so you should accept "personal responsibility" rather than suing him.

"Personal responsibility" can mean anything you want it to. Why should not the school board involved be recalled on the basis of their failure of "personal responsibility" in allowing a Bible in the classroom? Why should Bush not be jailed for "personal responsibility" for a war which some say hasn't gone well and has lasted longer than he expected? Why should Mccain not be jailed for "personal responsibility" for being shot down? See how absurd it can get?

The phrase is meaningless.

719 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:19:18am

re: #718 InternationalObserver

This gets the 'Good Grief' award of the day.

Yes, I do see how absurd it can get.

720 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:20:03am

re: #718 InternationalObserver


"Why should not the school board involved be recalled on the basis of their failure of "personal responsibility" in allowing a Bible in the classroom?"

Actually, from what I've read, they been dealing with complaints against this teacher/preacher for 11 years. There is a very good case that they did fail the "personal responsibility" test, or, at least, the "public trust" test. They should be recalled. They should be dismissed. And they will be sued.

721 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:20:54am

Here is the full report, with details:
[Link: www.dispatch.com...]

The report shows several points:

1. Freshwater did teach creationism, judging by students' challenging evolution in later grades.

2. The report is ambiguous about whether Freshwater did so after instructed to stop. In other words, if he never disobeyed direct reprimand, then he was wrongfully dismissed.

3. As I suspected, the generator was a Tesla coil, which the report mis-spellt as "telsa". The report shows the marking was entirely voluntary, exactly as I have said several times now we used to do to ourselves as science students. This is play, not "child abuse".

I think this all supports my suspicion from the start: (a) Freshwater is a good teacher who is also an eccentric religious guy who pushes the envelope and needs to be reined in, but not fired. (b) The marking incident is just an excuse for getting rid of him. The real reason is that his religiosity is an annoyance.

As an atheist, I think it is my "personal responsibility" to not only tolerate the religious, but defend their rights. The teachers' 21 years, apparently well-known competence, and some flexibility (removing some religious objects) means the school administration should have respected his religious views and negotiated with him rather than trumping up a false "child abuse" allegation in order to fire him.

If he's fired, I think it likely he'll nail the school district in court on both procedural and Constitutional grounds.

Since the teenager partcipated voluntarily, the teenager's parents should also remember the teacher can counter-sue them for defamation. Both the school district and the parents are taking the matter to a point it doesn't belong. This stuff does not belong in court.

722 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:22:28am

re: #721 InternationalObserver

Why is it so important to you to establish that you're an "atheist?"

723 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:23:58am

re: #713 InternationalObserver

If an English teacher wants to assign an essay debating a controversial topic, fine.
Most sensible teachers and/or administrators will always offer topic choices to the students, BTW, so that no one will be compelled to view or read material on a particular subject. A good teacher will also provide sources on all sides of an issue. Learning to develop arguments is a valuable exercise.

But what this has to do with a science class is beyond me.
The point of a science class is to teach......... science.

If my kid is in a physics class and is learning about atomic fission, I do not want the teacher to preach peace studies to him. I don't want him given a movie about the USA's "wicked deeds" at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is not that I think moral philosophy and history are worthless, nor in any way inferior to science. But they are NOT science and should not be taught in a science class.

724 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:26:22am

re: #721 InternationalObserver

And by the way, why do you have three accounts registered here?

725 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:27:34am

re: #717 MJ

Had he done the arm burning thing in Sunday school, without a parent's permission, he'd probably be out on his ear in about 30 seconds.
I would have smacked him silly.

726 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:29:39am

re: #721 InternationalObserver


First you write,

"Freshwater did teach creationism..."


the you go on and state,

"The teachers' 21 years, apparently well-known competence..."

The teaching of creationism in a science class is prima facie evidence that he is not competent to be teaching science.

727 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:29:51am

re: #718 InternationalObserver

Why should Mccain not be jailed for "personal responsibility" for being shot down?

This might be the most convoluted thing I've read in a long, long time.

728 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:34:34am

re: #720 MJ

Actually, from what I've read, they been dealing with complaints against this teacher/preacher for 11 years. There is a very good case that they did fail the "personal responsibility" test, or, at least, the "public trust" test. They should be recalled. They should be dismissed. And they will be sued.

And those who sue will lose. Parents have no legal right to never have religion mentioned in the classroom. On the contrary, Freshwater has a good legal argument that his free-speech rights are being violated.

Complaints are irrelevant unless justified. The fact of a complaint does not make the complaint justified. How many complaints do you think the left can trump up against Bush? How many drug dealers have filed administrative and court complaints about police? Do you think that means police should be jailed?

I object to your using the term "preacher" since I provided a link to an article in which a student said he did NOT preach.

As for suit, I think both the school district and the parents should beware. Freshwater has one hell of a whopping suit against them - defamation (for mis-characterising the marking incident), wrongful dismissal (since he seems to have complied with all the Board's requirements), etc.

Your suggestion of suit for the school board is ridiculous. They have to obey the law. There are no grounds that they didn't. The law allows teachers to be religious within limits, and to express that within limits. The board did the right thing telling him to take down materials and giving him time to comply. With your attitude towards empoyees, you'd be sued by employees over and over.

I revert to my original suspicion. This is all a bunch of b.s. blown out of proportion by parents and school board who don't like religiosity. Well, neither do I like religiosity. But being an adult means not every disagreement belongs in court.

The school board and parents should have negotiated with Freshwater and kept it out of court. If the Board fires him, it deserves to be sued by Freshwater, and he may well win.

You're all being ridiculous here: "Oh, how horrible! A creationist! Hang him high!"

729 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:39:01am

Once again, why the 3 accounts?

730 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:43:24am

re: #721 InternationalObserver

This is a middle school.
Children 11-14, the overwhelming majority under 14.
The child's consent may spare the teacher from felony assault and battery charges and a paid vacation in the pokey, but that's about as far as the "consent" defense will take him. IMO

731 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:44:38am

re: #724 Charles

Another family member and a room-mate, each with their own opinions.

I usually agree with most LGF stuff, but in the case of this teacher I think everyone's going overboard. Since he's been there a long time, and since the students like him, and since he knows his stuff by the school board's own reviews, the board should simply negotiate with him to tone down the religiosity if he wants to keep his job.

Lots of lawsuits are avoidable. This case is an example. It really sounds as if secular leftist parents and school board don't want to negotiate with this religious guy and want to crush him. Well, I don't agree with creationism either, but we should live and let live.

In school, we used to have gung-ho teachers of both left and right. Good parents encouraged the students to argue back. That's the way this should be handled, not firing and not the courts.

732 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:46:56am

re: #730 wolfie

None of the artiucles have said a word about criminal charges. I suspect the local DA has more sense than the school board to waste time on this. Just tell the guy to lay off the Tesla coil play and that's the end of it.

733 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:48:46am

re: #728 InternationalObserver

Based on the link you yourself provided, he DID preach.
Are we supposed to dismiss this because one of the children said he didn't?

734 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:52:40am

In school, we used to have gung-ho teachers of both left and right. Good parents encouraged the students to argue back. That's the way this should be handled, not firing and not the courts.

Yes, it's those pesky students' faults. They need to learn how to argue back with the teacher.

/

735 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:53:53am

re: #731 InternationalObserver

Kids like a lot of things- things that adults know to not be in the long term interest of the child. Perhaps the kids like him because he didn't give them lots of homework. Perhaps they liked him because he handed out candy. Perhaps they liked him because they weren't challenged to learn much and could spend that period of school being slackers- who knows? My point is- saying the children liked him is not a defense as the children have not reached the legal age to know any better.

Adults, however, do know better, and what's more- the parents have legal rights to their children. The school board has a legal responsibility to the students as well. To call all these people "leftists" because you think the teacher is being treated unfairly is yet another gross mis-characterization on your part. You have zero idea what political affiliation these adults are. Shame on you.

736 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:54:35am

re: #727 Sharmuta

Sharmuta, my comments had question marks at the end of the sentence. I did not say McCain responsible. I pointed out that the concept of "personal responsibility" is so malleable as to be meaningless.

I think in the end this will end up unnecessarily in the courts. The courts may decide that the friction means they won't re-instate the teacher, but will give him a sizeable chunk of change for wrongful dismissal.

It's a shame. Competent teachers don't grow on trees, especially those who keep the kids interested. By all accounts he knows his stuff and the kids like him. He seems to usually have obeyed explicit school board instructions. So I still think the school board should have simply given him very specific instructions - no posters, stick to the textbook - and told him to stop playing with Tesla coils.

This didn't belong in court.

737 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:54:56am

re: #731 InternationalObserver

This case is an example. It really sounds as if secular leftist parents and school board don't want to negotiate with this religious guy and want to crush him.

And there it is.

738 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:56:04am

re: #731 InternationalObserver

Another family member and a room-mate, each with their own opinions.

And your family member and friend are using the same internet connection as you?

739 hellosnackbar  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:59:25am

Perhaps the kid was lucky on another day the teacher might have thrust his arm into a bag of rattlesnakes.

740 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:09:13am

re: #733 wolfie

About preaching: You missed my point above, in which I asked about the timing - before or after he was told no? I infer without absolute proof that he taught creationism (not exactly preaching) but stopped when the board reprimanded him explicitly. Even the pdf I posted wasn't clear.

If he ignored an explicit instruction from the board, then that's firable. But it's not clear, since he did remove objects when told. That leaves open the question of whether or not he stopped "teaching" creationism when told to do so. The pdf doesn't say when he did this and when (or if) he stopped.

If job-holders couldn't make mistakes, there would be none. If he made the mistake of teaching creationism but stopped when the board told him to stop, then he has a good case for wrongful dismissal.

Also, note this item from the report:

"Mr. Maley said that there were no formal complaints against Mr. Freshwater because parents did not want him fired, so there is nothing in writing in his file."

Now do you see why I say both "rush to judgment" and "blown out of proportion"?

Media need sensationalism, so articles are a poor guide to what happened when they say things like "branding". Secularists and religious are often at each others' throats, making it a point of pride to have (or not have) any religious expression in schools.

I'm irreligious, but think compromise in order. It's a shame for this incident to occupy court time when there are real criminals (and civil legal problems) out there. And to lose a good teacher by not reaching some sort of compromise with him.

741 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:10:05am

re: #738 Charles

Yes.

742 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:11:07am

re: #740 InternationalObserver

I'm irreligious...

Again, why is it so important for you to make sure to say this in nearly every post?

743 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:12:35am

re: #741 InternationalObserver

Yes.

And all three of you just happened to log in within minutes of each other this morning?

744 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:13:30am

re: #728 InternationalObserver

Your post reminds of the of that old saying, "Throw enough mud at the wall and some of it will stick."

There's really too much to try an entangle without spending the rest of the day dealing with these fallacious arguments.

As to your claim of that "Freshwater has a good legal argument that his free-speech rights are being violated".

Not really. He has no First Adornment claim. If we allow your argument to stand, then any teacher is free to say anything in any classroom across the country. It's free speech, don'tchaknow.

You can object all you want to the term "preaching". However, since creationism is religion, the teaching of creationism in a science class is a form of preaching. It is evangelizing. It is substituting a religious doctrine for a scientific theory.

Why a cross? Of all the symbols one could possibly come up with, Freshwater settles on the cross. But I guess that's not religious symbol either.

As for Freshwater's religiosity, well, he's welcome to be as religious as he want. I don't care how often he attends his Church.
I don't care what he believes. I do care when he mis-uses his position of authority and brings his religiosity into a public school for the purpose of evangelizing his students. He want to teach religion...fine...I'm sure there are plenty of private religious schools he could be working at.

"The school board and parents should have negotiated with Freshwater and kept it out of court."

Actually, I believe the school board was derelict in it's duty. This preacher should have been dismissed a decade ago. I do not believe the parents share a duty to negotiate with Freshwater. That is why there are school boards. While you obviously do not believe this belongs in Court, I think that's exactly where this matter should be decided...and, unlike you, I believe the school board is looking at a substantial judgment against it.

And, if I were one of these parents, I would be asking why no assault charges haven't been filed against Freshwater.

745 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:18:05am

P.S. The creationists will exist for as long as religion does. I think it's wiser to reach a compromise than continuously fight with them.

Christian creationists don't scare me. Islamists do. This teacher is small stuff compared to the Islamist threat, like the Virginia school and Ehrehfeld lawsuit that LGF highlighted. That was important stuff, and only LGF gave it proper attention.

But this teacher is small fry, and the left will hold those like him in check.

I'm not so convinced the left will hold Islamists in check.

746 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:19:10am

re: #743 Charles

And all three of you just happened to log in within minutes of each other this morning?

Now now, we shouldn't jump to conclusions. They all line up in a single file line to post.
/

747 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:23:28am

re: #743 Charles

Yes. Usually I agree with LGF, but I shouted to them that for the first time I disagreed, and they decided they agreed with me. But they didn't think it important enough to bother arguing on my behalf.

Frankly, neither do I. I'm irreligious. Why should I care about this teacher? He's not really my problem.

Still, my point is - be wary of articles that say things like "branding". The pdf showed this just tomfoolery to amuse the kids. As i said, we (or our teacher) used to mark ourselves by plaing with silver nitrate. Maybe not a good idea, but hardly "branding". That's too sensationalist. I think we all know the MSM not always accurate.

748 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:26:29am

re: #746 gman

"They all line up in a single file line to post."

My room-mates didn't post. Inaccurate MSM reporting of (legal and semi-legal) disputes is my hobbyhorse, not theirs.

749 A. van Hilten  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:26:50am

re: #729 gman

Once again, why the 3 accounts?

One for the Father, one for the Son and one for the Holy Ghost?

</sarc>

PS: Sorry for my "irreligious" (or was it "Christian-bashing"?) dive-by post!

750 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:27:05am

re: #740 InternationalObserver

Teaching creationism is preaching.
Teaching creationism as if it were science is incompetence.
The "Tesla coil play," as you call it, is prima facie evidence of gross irresponsibility.

He should be fired.
If he then sues, he will lose.

751 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:31:14am

re: #742 Charles

Again, why is it so important for you to make sure to say this in nearly every post?

Because this may be the first time I've ever found myself defending religion in any way, shape, or form. It feels odd.

But I have managed employees. And in a litigious world and in the case of litigious matters (such as religion, race, gender, etc) it's usually better to compromise with a long-term, capable employee, than to start a court fight that will take energy and money.

752 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:32:59am

re: #749 A. van Hilten

One for the Father, one for the Son and one for the Holy Ghost?

</sarc>

PS: Sorry for my "irreligious" (or was it "Christian-bashing"?) dive-by post!

Don't worry, InternationalObserver won't be offended because it has let us know it is irreligious many times now.

753 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:34:56am

re: #745 InternationalObserver

"The creationists will exist for as long as religion does. I think it's wiser to reach a compromise than continuously fight with them."

You made our point...creationism is religion. It has no place in a public school's science class. There already is a compromise in place:
Teach it, if you need to, in Church or any other religious institution. But do not bring it into the public schools.

Christian creationists don't scare me. Islamists do.

They both should scare you on this level: They both wish to blur the distinction between the private and public sphere. Islam does not recognize the private sphere. Creationists are attempting to force their religious dogma upon the public sphere.

754 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:37:16am

re: #749 A. van Hilten

One for the Father, one for the Son and one for the Holy Ghost?

One of the 60's black radicals (Eldridge Cleaver? Soul on Ice?) wrote about the discontent of his religious instructor in prison, who asked whether anyone understood the Holy Trinity.

Cleaver was taken aback when the teacher wouldn't let him answer, sayng nobody understood the mystery of the Holy Trinity.

Cleaver was taken aback, because he thought he had the perfect explanation - he was going to use an analogy to three-in-one motor oil.

;-}

755 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:41:32am

I love how this key aspect has been ignored by some people here:

* The Ten Commandments together with other posters of a religious nature were posted in Mr. Freshwater’s classroom. Most were removed after Mr. White’s letter of April 14, 2008, but at least one poster remained which Mr. Freshwater was again instructed to remove on April 16, 2008, but did not do so.

Comply with the school board, my *ss.

756 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:42:31am

re: #751 InternationalObserver

Because this may be the first time I've ever found myself defending religion in any way, shape, or form. It feels odd.

OK. I guess it's just coincidence that your points are identical to the ones promoted by the Discovery Institute and Ben Stein's 'Expelled'.

757 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:58:44am

I thought that InternationalObserver's comments to be very interesting and I am sorry to see him dinged down so much here.

I know that anyone can claim they are "Christians" or "atheists" or "Jewish" online and there is no proof and we are to take at face value unless certain verbiage is used by that person that reveals that is not typical of said worldview claimed by that person, like the one "Jewish" troll that came here one day and I was thinking, that is not typical Jewish response!

But so far, his responses has not disproved whether he was an atheist but he does have a point. That we need to look beyond the articles and not rush to judgement, even when we agree with the article on a visceral level.

I thought InternationalObserver to be quite level headed and not driven by emotional impulse. If he is atheist as he claims, I sure would like to have a conversation with him because he has an interesting mind...

I am so sorry to see the response to this from InternationalObserver:

Christian creationists don't scare me. Islamists do. This teacher is small stuff compared to the Islamist threat, like the Virginia school and Ehrehfeld lawsuit that LGF highlighted. That was important stuff, and only LGF gave it proper attention.

was this from MJ

They both should scare you on this level: They both wish to blur the distinction between the private and public sphere. Islam does not recognize the private sphere. Creationists are attempting to force their religious dogma upon the public sphere.

I would not equate "forcing religious dogma" to have teachers mention creationism as an alternative possibility how life on Earth came about. I mean, if the possibility of extra terrestrials planting life on Earth could be mentioned (Panspermia) why couldn't creationism, or the 'Establishment Clause' neutral Intelligent Design?

By allowing different worldview is NOT forcing dogma.

I think an example of forcing dogma is presenting only one worldview and that is the only worldview we will allow.

758 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:01:59pm

re: #753 MJ

"You made our point...creationism is religion. It has no place in a public school's science class. There already is a compromise in place: Teach it, if you need to, in Church or any other religious institution. But do not bring it into the public schools."

Of course creationism (or the euphemism "intelligent design") is religion. So, let the kids debate it, so long as they're not under pressure to believe it. And above all don't bother with court fights about it when there's a war on - especially if it's possible to negotiate with the guy. Be tolerant. It takes all kinds to make a world. And every principle (no religion in schools/science) becomes ridiculous if rigid. That's exactly the ACLU's problem - taking a principle to rigidity.

"Christian creationists don't scare me. Islamists do." They both should scare you on this level: They both wish to blur the distinction between the private and public sphere. Islam does not recognize the private sphere. Creationists are attempting to force their religious dogma upon the public sphere.

Yes, you're right. (I'm a scientist. How the heck did I end up defending religion? Actually, I'm not defending creationism, just the idea that the right thing to do in this instance is compromise with the guy and tell him to stop the Tesla business.)

But it's a matter of degree or proportion. When I get on a plane, I don't look over my shoulder for religious Christian hijackers or suiciders. The Christian fanatics got a few abortion doctors and one movie theatre in Paris. I think they've calmed down a bit and are a fraction of the threat of Islamists.

That's one of the left's problems, by the way - confusing degree or proportion. Sure, there are Christian fanatics. But the left uses that as an excuse to advance Islamism. Yes, Abu Ghraib was a mistake. But the left loses sense of degree or proportion when they compare it (or Gitmo) to Nazi camps. In other words, superficial similarities but a huge difference in proportion, can make two things very different. That's why I think Christian or Hindu fundamentalism a far smaller problem than Islamic fundamentalism.

So, if all the Christian right does is demonstrate about "piss Christ" or bother everyone with creationism, I'd really not worry about them - that's only a fraction as scary as the mass momentum of creeping dhimmitude in the west.

Sorry for the typos. The spell-checker is slow so I skip it too often.

And here I thought most threads died around #650 or so. Usually the ends of threads are pretty hum-drum.

759 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:03:19pm

"Intelligent design" is not science, and it does not belong in a science classroom.

760 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:10:02pm

re: #757 psaturn

PSaturn, I think you have understood my points exactly. Thank you.

re: #756 Charles

OK. I guess it's just coincidence that your points are identical to the ones promoted by the Discovery Institute and Ben Stein's 'Expelled'.

I have never heard of the Discovery Institute, and I heard about "Expelled" for the first time on this thread. Stein gets involved in lots of things but I had no idea he'd gotten involved with a creationist film.

Nor have I given any arguments for creationism. I have given only arguments (more scepticism than arguments) about whether this teacher is really such an ogre.

761 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:16:23pm

re: #759 Charles

"Intelligent design" is not science, and it does not belong in a science classroom.

Neither does evolutionism on a macro scale...the idea of Common Descent from a single source of life. It is not science. Not "supportable" according to strict scientific protocols.

So far, the "proofs" of evolution so far, the citrate bacterias, the new lizard species are example of micro evolution and no one argues that it happens.

The problem in this discussion is that we are dealing with two different evolutions and both use the same word.

That is why I emphasize MACRO and MICRO evolution.

The fact that it works for one does not always mean that it works for the other situation. That it works for bacterias may not apply to others.

762 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:20:18pm

re: #761 psaturn

Neither does evolutionism on a macro scale...the idea of Common Descent from a single source of life. It is not science. Not "supportable" according to strict scientific protocols.

Here we go again. You're distorting/misrepresenting the terms, and this is why I told you before that it's not productive to discuss this with you.

763 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:24:57pm

re: #761 psaturn

Bullshit....

Platypus Genome Reveals Secrets of Mammal Evolution
There are mountains of evidence. Just because you won't acknowledge it doesn't make it true.

764 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:34:10pm

re: #763 Killgore Trout

Bullshit....

Platypus Genome Reveals Secrets of Mammal Evolution
There are mountains of evidence. Just because you won't acknowledge it doesn't make it true.

Killgore, have the scientists figured out where to put the Platypus on the Tree of Life?

765 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:39:38pm

[Link: www.eurekalert.org...]

"Their genomic organization was strange and a little unexpected," says Batzer. "It appeared much more bird- and reptile-like than mammalian, even though it is indeed classified as a mammal."

Having the genome in hand is a huge step for scientists seeking new details about evolution and human disease. The fact that the platypus is an ancient animal that is relatively primitive and unchanged may be a scientific boon for researchers.

At least that's the hope of researchers at the National Science Foundation (NSF), who partially funded the study. "Looking at the platypus genome may yield clues about the functions of certain components of DNA and contribute to our understanding of evolution," says Mark Weiss, division director for NSF's behavioral and cognitive sciences.

The platypus occupies the first branch of the mammalian tree of life after the split from "saurepsoids" about 315 million years ago. It maintains some long dated features and, as a result, should provide information on how mammals evolved.

766 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:46:16pm

re: #764 psaturn

Yes.

767 InternationalObserver  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:54:55pm

Sorry, I can't resist. Is a baby platypus called a platypussy?

768 Salamantis  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:55:23pm

I try to make this point on every one of these evolution vs. creation threads.

The proof for divergent evolution via mutation and natural selection from common ancestors is found in our genes, in the artifactual retroviral sequences embedded in our DNA that we share with genetically closely related species:

[Link: www.newyorker.com...]

Here is a quote, but read the whole thing.

“If Charles Darwin reappeared today, he might be surprised to learn that humans are descended from viruses as well as from apes,” Weiss wrote.

Darwin’s surprise almost certainly would be mixed with delight: when he suggested, in “The Descent of Man” (1871), that humans and apes shared a common ancestor, it was a revolutionary idea, and it remains one today. Yet nothing provides more convincing evidence for the “theory” of evolution than the viruses contained within our DNA. Until recently, the earliest available information about the history and the course of human diseases, like smallpox and typhus, came from mummies no more than four thousand years old. Evolution cannot be measured in a time span that short. Endogenous retroviruses provide a trail of molecular bread crumbs leading millions of years into the past.

Darwin’s theory makes sense, though, only if humans share most of those viral fragments with relatives like chimpanzees and monkeys. And we do, in thousands of places throughout our genome. If that were a coincidence, humans and chimpanzees would have had to endure an incalculable number of identical viral infections in the course of millions of years, and then, somehow, those infections would have had to end up in exactly the same place within each genome. The rungs of the ladder of human DNA consist of three billion pairs of nucleotides spread across forty-six chromosomes. The sequences of those nucleotides determine how each person differs from another, and from all other living things. The only way that humans, in thousands of seemingly random locations, could possess the exact retroviral DNA found in another species is by inheriting it from a common ancestor.

Molecular biology has made precise knowledge about the nature of that inheritance possible. With extensive databases of genetic sequences, reconstructing ancestral genomes has become common, and retroviruses have been found in the genome of every vertebrate species that has been studied. Anthropologists and biologists have used them to investigate not only the lineage of primates but the relationships among animals—dogs, jackals, wolves, and foxes, for example—and also to test whether similar organisms may in fact be unrelated.

769 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:55:36pm

re: #766 Killgore Trout

My question was related to this:


Kangaroo, Platypus Are Not Related After All; Duke Scientists Refute Current Molecular Method Of Classifying Mammals

ScienceDaily (July 6, 2001) — DURHAM, N.C. -- Classifying kangaroos and platypuses together on the evolutionary family tree is as absurd as adding your neighbors to your own family ancestral line simply because they share your love of the opera, according to scientists at Duke University.

[Link: www.sciencedaily.com...]

770 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:58:23pm

re: #767 InternationalObserver

You even got a sense of humor!

771 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 12:58:54pm

re: #769 psaturn

Yes, that was 2001. The Platypus genome was decoded only a few months ago.

772 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:06:01pm

re: #768 Salamantis

Salamantis,

Isn't interesting that viruses are not considered "living" things in Biology?

UA Q&A: Is a virus a living thing? How can you tell?

Jeannine Durdik, professor of biological sciences in the J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences, replies:

Viruses are not classified in the kingdom of living things, and the question of whether or not they are living organisms is still an open one in the scientific community. Some biologists see the virus as a nonliving infectious particle. Others believe it is alive because of its ability to manipulate the host cell.

A virus is little more than a strand of DNA or RNA with a protein coating. Viruses cannot reproduce on their own - they require a host cell, which they invade, injecting their genetic information into the hosts' DNA and forcing it to reproduce the viral DNA and other virus parts. Think of a virus as a renter without a security deposit.

773 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:08:00pm

re: #771 Killgore Trout

Yes, that was 2001. The Platypus genome was decoded only a few months ago.

I know...

The platypus' place in the mammalian tree was moved.

774 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:08:07pm

re: #772 psaturn

Non sequitur.

775 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:17:54pm

re: #774 Charles

Charles, I was thinking in the light of the Law of Biogenesis:

-[Link: www.biology-online.org...]

I do know it has this clause:

It is worth noting that louis Pasteur's research dealt with what can be observed to happen in the present day and says nothing about

what may have happened on earth in the past

.

776 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:18:54pm

More non sequiturs.

777 psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:39:56pm

re: #756 Charles

OK. I guess it's just coincidence that your points are identical to the ones promoted by the Discovery Institute and Ben Stein's 'Expelled'.

I don't think it is the same thing.

I have not seen him presenting from a religious viewpoint. What I see is that he is not falling for the moral equivalency of a Jihadist bent to destroy the Western Civilization with a Creationist (whose goal may be trying to save the Western Civilization after all).

778 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 1:50:12pm

re: #777 psaturn

I have not seen him presenting from a religious viewpoint

.

Of course he's promoting a religious viewpoint. It just happens to be one that you agree with. By why stop at the Judeo-Christian Creation Myth? Here's a whole group of other Creation Myths he could be teaching as well since there is obviously no objective standard of which myth is true if we throw science out the window:

[Link: www.magictails.com...]

Comanche Creation Myth
Egyptian Creation Myths

African - Mande, Yoruba Creation Myths

Several different short Creation Stories

Micmac Creation Myth

African Creation Myth - Olori

Comparison of 4 African Creation Myths

Korean & Japanese Creation Myth comparisons

Navajo Creation Myth

Norse Creation Myth

Creation Myth from India

Japanese Creation Myth

Comanche Creation Myth

Chinese Creation Myth

Chelan Creation Myth

Pima Creation Myth

Mayan Creation Myth

Miwok Creation Myth

Scandinavian (Norse) Creation Myths

Salish Creation Myth

Australian Aboriginal Creation Myth

Hopi Creation Myth

Tahitian Creation Myth

Yokut Creation Myth

Comanche Creation Myth


Lakota Creation Myth

Several Creation Stories: India, Romania, Mongol, etc..

Chinese Creation / Flood Myth

Assyrian / Babylonian Creation Myth

Maori Creation Myth

Christian & Jewish Creation Myth (Genesis)

Aztec Creation Myth

Digueno Creation Myth

Apache Creation Myth

African Creation Myths

Dakota Creation Myth

Hungarian Creation Myth

Iroquois Creation Myth

Inuit Creation Myth

Huron Creation Myth

Hawaiian Creation Myth

779 Psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 2:10:39pm

re: #778 MJ

MJ, may I ask what is the religious viewpoint is InternationalObserver sharing? Could you quote him? I probably missed it...and if you can show it, then I take back what I said.

780 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 2:11:23pm

re: #758 InternationalObserver

Of course creationism (or the euphemism "intelligent design") is religion. So, let the kids debate it, so long as they're not under pressure to believe it.

I have no problem with Children or anyone else debating creationism...as long as it's not in science class. If a teacher wants to talk about the Judeo-Christan Creation Myth in an Anthropology class, then that's fine with me. Of course, there's no reason to privilege that creation myth over the Aztec Creation Myth or the Hopi Creation Myth or any of the other several dozen Creation myths which anthropologists have cataloged over the years.

When I get on a plane, I don't look over my shoulder for religious Christian hijackers or suiciders. The Christian fanatics got a few abortion doctors and one movie theatre in Paris. I think they've calmed down a bit and are a fraction of the threat of Islamists.

It's funny but I'm not the one who brought "Christian fanatics" into this discussion. I was very careful to refer to "Creationists"...you're the one who added "Christian" to that. By doing so, you betray your own agenda and provide a glimpse into what you do believe- that Creationists and Christan's are basically synonymous. And that's very revealing.

The war against Islamism is not carte blanche to disregard two the highest achievements of American civilization: The Establishment Clause of the Constitution and the founding of a public education system based upon rationalism and science.

781 Psaturn  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 2:45:04pm

re: #780 MJ

MJ, that is the challenge, there is no such thing as anthropology or philosophy class in schools until you get to college. And I did take them and enjoyed it except for the Anthropology textbook who did not understand Catholic theology of transubstantiation.

The creationism and evolutionism can be considered a philosophical debate. After all, each position is a worldview in how you see the world and interpret accordingly.

I do agree and accept science being religion neutral, but imposing an "atheistic" worldview by incorporating the idea of life coming on its own without an "higher intelligent being" interference and proposing a Common Descent theory...that is a different story. And note, that the idea of myriads of life forms coming on its own without outside intelligent interference's only sole explanation is Natural Selection!

There is no question that Natural Selection occurs NOW...but does it always apply to the past? Does it really explain the question of life and myriads classes of life? Is Darwinism the only acceptable answer that Biology offers?

782 InternationalO