LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

'Intelligent Design' Teacher Back Story

Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:06:46 pm PDT

Paul Sunstone has some very interesting details on the story behind the story of that Ohio creationist science teacher who burned a cross into a student’s arm: The Firing of John Freshwater.

Yesterday’s report reveals Mr. Freshwater has a long history of complaints against him — all of which have been more or less ignored until the most recent ones. John Freshwater has taught at Mount Vernon Middle School for 21 years. For at least the past 11 years, he has been the subject of numerous complaints lodged against him by his fellow teachers, his students, and their parents.

His colleagues over at the high school, for instance, claim his teaching of evolution is so flawed they are forced to re-teach the subject to his students when they get into high school. It has also come out that Mr. Freshwater has been told on at least several occasions to change his behavior, but has refused to do so. Only now, years after the complaints first started coming in, has anything been done about them.

Today, Friday, the School Board “...unanimously passed a resolution of intent to consider the termination of [Mr. Freshwater’s] teaching contract. “Board president Ian Watson said the board will proceed with termination at its meeting on July 7, unless Freshwater files a written request for a hearing within 10 days of receiving notice of the board’s intent to fire him.”

Yet even before today’s School Board news, Mr. Freshwater’s friends were aiming to payback the Board. The melodramatic Minutemen United group earlier this week launched a drive to recall the School Board. Although the drive does not seem to have much chance of succeeding, it might indicate just how hot tempers are in Mount Vernon these days.

Minutemen United was founded by David Daubenmire, a man who was himself sued by the ACLU in 1999 for leading the high school football team he coached in prayer. Mr. Daubenmire is a close friend of Mr. Freshwater and has called the accusations against him a “witch hunt”. Mr. Daubenmire has said:

The science experiment [the alleged burning of the student] took place in December, and the parents did not go to the police and didn’t file a criminal complaint. It was not until April, when John Freshwater refused to remove his Bible, that the school board rapidly made the decision to accuse him of things and then go back and find evidence.

With the exception of the science experiment, John Freshwater is teaching the beliefs and values that the majority of people in this community agree with. The only thing the On Call report found is evidence that Mr. Freshwater is a Christian.

So, Mr. Daubenmire is still trying to spin the story as merely about John Freshwater displaying a Bible.

There is much more to this story than I have the space for — so I have provided references and further reading at the end of this post. It occurs to me, however, that we have here one instance of what’s going on in many hundreds — even thousands — of science classrooms across the country. Teachers entrusted to teach science are instead teaching creationism and intelligent design.

Advertisement

798 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Roentgen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:07:50pm

Freshwater is getting stale.

2 Dark_Falcon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:10:46pm

This guy is someone we need to denounce. Someone this crazy needs to be thorn under the bus, ASAP.

3 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:12:25pm
4 pegcity  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:12:40pm

The guy sounds like an asshole

5 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:13:14pm
6 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:16:09pm

Here's the device used to burn the student: "Electro-technic Model BD 10-A."
[Link: www.electrotechnicproduct.com...]

7 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:16:09pm

About all I can say right now is that I am very happy that this did not take place in the South...especially in Tennessee.

8 EC Marm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:17:04pm

Please, no mention of FGM in this thread.

9 MarkX  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:17:23pm
John Freshwater has taught at Mount Vernon Middle School for 21 years. For at least the past 11 years, he has been the subject of numerous complaints lodged against him by his fellow teachers, his students, and their parents.

Got to admit, those teachers have a hell of a union.

Impossible to fire one.

10 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:17:35pm

I just am in awe of this whole situation. As someone who actually agrees that Christianity is under attack in America due to a misguided commitment to multi-culturalism, I don't see this as the case here. This moron is not the target of discrimination.

11 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:17:47pm

And, please. No one make the claim that this superficial burn on a teen boy's arm is the same as ripping out the clitoris from a little girl.

Please.

12 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:17:58pm

re: #7 MandyManners

About all I can say right now is that I am very happy that this did not take place in the South...especially in Tennessee.

To a leftist from CA or NY, Ohio is considered the South.

13 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:18:31pm

re: #8 EC Marm

Please, no mention of FGM in this thread.

Thank you!

14 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:18:33pm

re: #9 MarkX

Got to admit, those teachers have a hell of a union.

Impossible to fire one.

Gotta love a system that will protect teachers no matter how incompetent, derranged or idiotic they might be.

15 MarkX  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:18:43pm

re: #11 MandyManners

And, please. No one make the claim that this superficial burn on a teen boy's arm is the same as ripping out the clitoris from a little girl.

Please.

I've been out of the loop for the last few days. Did someone really say that here?

16 The Other Les  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:18:50pm

re: #11 MandyManners

And, please. No one make the claim that this superficial burn on a teen boy's arm is the same as ripping out the clitoris from a little girl.

Please.

No, but it is still intolerable conduct.

17 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:19:00pm

re: #12 HelloDare

To a leftist from CA or NY, Ohio is considered the South.

Ignorant pukes.

18 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:19:00pm
19 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:19:11pm

What gets me about this story is that they're running this guy into the ground while teachers with liberal agendas get a free ticket to brainwash students.

Don't get me wrong, I think this teacher is a jerk and should get fired (though I do suspect embellishment on the cross-burning story as I've played with those guns before and have never heard of one leaving a mark) But I believe in equal treatment for douchebaggery in all its forms, especially when it comes to the education of our kids. Case in point: Did Mr. "Jesus Glasses" out in California get fired?

20 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:19:19pm

re: #15 MarkX

I've been out of the loop for the last few days. Did someone really say that here?

Yes. Today.

21 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:01pm

re: #16 The Other Les

No, but it is still intolerable conduct.

So is picking one's nose in public.

22 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:11pm

re: #15 MarkX

I've been out of the loop for the last few days. Did someone really say that here?

don't go there, check the previous thread on the topic......

23 BignJames  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:17pm

Zealots are dangerous....no matter their religion or ideaology.IMO

24 NonNativeTexan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:21pm

He should not teach creationism in science class.
He should have removed all the religious material from his classroom
as instructed. He should be brought up on charges for burning
the student. But it's against the rules to pray at a
Fellowship of Christian Athlete's meeting? I don't get that.

25 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:32pm
26 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:40pm

re: #17 MandyManners

Ignorant pukes.

Actually, I know somebody who referred to Ohio as being in the Middle East.

27 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:48pm

re: #19 NoSpam

I agree that any teacher, in the day of the illiterate high-school graduate, who focuses on indoctrination instead of education should be fired. Public education is broken and broken on a grand scale at that.

28 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:49pm

re: #11 MandyManners

And, please. No one make the claim that this superficial burn on a teen boy's arm is the same as ripping out the clitoris from a little girl.

Please.


The other stuff about this teacher is true is true, but I suspect that the kid did it to himself. (or it was done to him by a friend)--which is also a good explanation as to why the kid's parents waited so long to come forward with it.

29 june_july  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:54pm

How can America's children go into the future and compete with the hard-working graduates of the rest of the world if their teachers are forcing the pablum of religious dogma down their throats, rather than real science.

In every study done in the past decade that I can recall, US students have performed abysmally compared to others, almost never in the top 10 in basic skills and knowledge, and sometimes far worse. Excuses are always made, but they are just that.

Right now it is US Universities keep us in the science game, as they are well funded and very deep in talent based on recruitment from all over the world, but how long will that continue for if the raw material is being destroyed.

30 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:20:54pm
With the exception of the science experiment, John Freshwater is teaching the beliefs and values that the majority of people in this community agree with

Except that's NOT HIS JOB!

His job was to teach science, not religious beliefs.

31 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:21:11pm
32 MarkX  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:21:21pm

re: #14 DeathtotheSwiss

Gotta love a system that will protect teachers no matter how incompetent, derranged or idiotic they might be.

Right.

This actually reminds me of Big Chief Churchill of Colorado.

Regardless of how incompetent, it is impossible to get rid of teachers/professors in the U.S.

33 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:21:28pm
34 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:21:30pm

Error report?

Now listening: Symphony No.0 in D minor


P.S. Evolution thread!

35 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:21:32pm

re: #24 NonNativeTexan

He should not teach creationism in science class.
He should have removed all the religious material from his classroom
as instructed. He should be brought up on charges for burning
the student. But it's against the rules to pray at a
Fellowship of Christian Athlete's meeting? I don't get that.

I'm a little bit confused about that.

36 Alouette  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:21:40pm

GARRISON: Now I, for one, think evolution is a bunch of BULLCRAP. But I've been told I have to teach it anyway. It was thought up by Charles Darwin and it goes something like this:

[goes up to a large poster of evolution and begins pointing things out with her pointer.]

In the beginning we were all fish. Okay? Swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby, and the retard baby was different, so it got to live. So Retard Fish goes on to make more retard babies, and then one day, a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with its

[waves his left hand limply]

mutant fish hands... and it had buttsex with a squirrel or something and made this.

[points to a rodent]

retard frog squirrel, and then that had a retard baby which was a... monkey fish-frog... And then this monkey fish-frog had buttsex with that monkey, and... that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey and... that made you!

[faces the class. A new girl is seated in the front row, looking around]

So there you go! You're the retarded offspring of five monkeys havin' buttsex with a fish-squirrel! Congratulations!

CARTMAN: [hopping out of his chair and running out] HEHHH! I can't take it anymore! HAAAAAH!

37 BignJames  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:22:09pm

re: #17 MandyManners

I barely consider Va. the South.

38 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:22:25pm

re: #26 HelloDare

Actually, I know somebody who referred to Ohio as being in the Middle East.

For real?!

39 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:23:36pm

He's gaining defenders/obfuscators among lizards.

40 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:23:51pm
Mr. Daubenmire is a close friend of Mr. Freshwater and has called the accusations against him a “witch hunt”.

Oh, the irony of a fundamentalist calling it a "witch hunt".

41 lawhawk  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:23:52pm

re: #3 buzzsawmonkey

It's nice to know the teachers' union protects incompetents of all backgrounds.

Unions protect the incompetents, but teachers unions are especially protective of the incompetent or even hazardous to the health of the charges they're supposed to keep.

In NYC, there's a building where teachers who are awaiting disciplinary hearings get to spend their days - getting paid not to teach.

42 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:23:58pm

re: #28 NoSpam

The other stuff about this teacher is true is true, but I suspect that the kid did it to himself. (or it was done to him by a friend)--which is also a good explanation as to why the kid's parents waited so long to come forward with it.

As mama winger posted in the earlier thread, kids that age are into all kinds of shit.

But, that does not excuse the teacher's actions.

43 godfrey  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:24:12pm

Bruckner, cool.

In what sense is this Mr. Freshwater a "teacher" if his colleagues have to re-teach his students?

44 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:24:20pm

re: #27 DeathtotheSwiss

It's sad when your education system becomes a big bag of epic fail...

Fortunately, the worst I got was a teacher in middle school who was a died-in-the-wool 60's radical communist stereotype. XD But she wasn't very good at it.

45 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:24:56pm

re: #37 BignJames

I barely consider Va. the South.

*whack*

46 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:24:56pm
47 EC Marm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:25:01pm

re: #34 Killgore Trout

Now listening: Symphony No.0 in D minor


I thought it was only computer programmers that started counting from zero. Musicians, too?

48 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:25:04pm
49 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:25:51pm

re: #24 NonNativeTexan

He should not teach creationism in science class.
He should have removed all the religious material from his classroom
as instructed. He should be brought up on charges for burning
the student. But it's against the rules to pray at a
Fellowship of Christian Athlete's meeting? I don't get that.

The idea of multi-culturalism has made it's goal the destruction of the American culture. I'm agnostic mind you, but I'm not anti-religion, and it is the fact that the majority of white Americans are Christian that Christianity is under attack. The idea is of course that white Christians are evil and their beliefs should not only be ignored but despised. This case of course, has nothing to do with the actual issue.

I've dealt with much of this multi-cultural nonsense myself. When talking about (earlier mentioned on this very thread) the female castration going on in Africa I heard the argument that, "It's their culture, you can't judge them for it."

If it weren't for my lack of faith I'd have called my anger "righteous".

50 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:26:11pm

re: #42 MandyManners


But, that does not excuse the teacher's actions.

Of course not. But dishonesty doesn't help anybody.

51 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:26:42pm

Teenage boy, you got to wonder. Maybe the dots were the preliminary outline for this sword tattoo. (strong language warning)

52 MarkX  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:26:51pm

re: #22 2by2

don't go there, check the previous thread on the topic......

No, thanks, I won't go there. I try to stay out of the ID/Evo debates.

They usually go 1,000+ post, everyone yells, and everyone gets pissed off.

I don't have a dog in that fight.

53 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:27:05pm

re: #28 NoSpam

I suggest you read the link before you blame the victim.

54 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:27:17pm

re: #47 EC Marm

I thought it was only computer programmers that started counting from zero. Musicians, too?

It's only once you start getting into the imaginary #'s that the music starts to sound a little strange...I mean, it's kind of hard to play notes that don't exist on any standard plane.

55 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:27:24pm

re: #38 MandyManners

For real?!

Yes. A relative, I'm ashamed to say.

56 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:27:36pm

re: #47 EC Marm

I thought it was only computer programmers that started counting from zero. Musicians, too?

Maybe they thought they had the whole opus numbering worked out, and another symphony turned up?

57 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:27:52pm

re: #30 Sharmuta

Except that's NOT HIS JOB!

His job was to teach science, not religious beliefs.

apparently he did a piss poor job, with some branding thrown in for good measure.

58 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:07pm

re: #31 buzzsawmonkey

Ha!

59 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:07pm

re: #50 NoSpam

WTF are you basing your opinion that this kid did this to himself?

Quit blaming the victim!

60 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:08pm
61 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:22pm

re: #41 lawhawk

Unions protect the incompetents, but teachers unions are especially protective of the incompetent or even hazardous to the health of the charges they're supposed to keep.

In NYC, there's a building where teachers who are awaiting disciplinary hearings get to spend their days - getting paid not to teach.

Don't for a single second think that there aren't buildings like that in every major city around the country. I knew of a similar place when I was in high school in Jacksonville, Florida.

62 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:26pm
63 tronman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:40pm

Ya know, I don't agree with what this guy was doing. However, I don't see this huge uproar by school boards and parents when other schools are cowtowing to islamic "needs" by providing segregated classes and special prayer time for muslim students. Just an observation.

64 godfrey  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:45pm

re: #52 MarkX

I don't have a dog in that fight

Because it evolved from a lone wolf?

65 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:28:46pm

re: #50 NoSpam

Of course not. But dishonesty doesn't help anybody.

I'm sorry but, I don't track.

66 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:29:05pm

re: #36 Alouette

South Park is a little too edgy for LGF, sometimes.

67 nyc redneck  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:29:33pm

why is it so difficult to get rid of an incompetent teacher?
that just shows how bad the system is. how powerful the teacher's union is and how that stagnates the goal of teaching our children.
mr. freshwater is stagnant and needs to go.

68 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:30:47pm

re: #55 HelloDare

Yes. A relative, I'm ashamed to say.

Time for some Tough Love?

69 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:31:06pm

re: #59 Sharmuta

From the link:

"The organization that investigated Mr. Freshwater was HR on Call, a human resources company. It took all of May and most of June to pour over the records, interview people, and otherwise research the matter. Yesterday, the Company released it’s report. Among the findings:

•Mr. Freshwater did burn a cross onto the complaining family’s child’s arm using an electrostatic device not designed for that purpose. While there did not appear to be any intent by Mr. Freshwater to cause injury to any student, he was not using the device for its intended purpose. Contrary to Mr. Freshwater’s statement he simply made an “X” not a “cross,” all of the students described the marking as a “cross” and the pictures provided depict a “cross.”

Is there any more detail about why Freshwater did this?

70 Alouette  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:31:15pm
71 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:31:35pm

re: #39 Killgore Trout

He's gaining defenders/obfuscators among lizards.

Yes- and it's pretty disgusting to see.

72 Cartman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:31:40pm

re: #26 HelloDare

Actually, I know somebody who referred to Ohio as being in the Middle East.

If you went to a local mall around here, you would think that's where you were.

73 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:31:44pm

I have no problem with this teacher being fired. Schools are places of learning, not indoctrination centers.

Let's rid the schools of the Freshwaters, and the teachers who "teach" man-made global warming nonsense; and Joannie has two mommies; and "compassion" for the "homeless"; and whatever the fuck else that has nothing to do with math or science or physical education or history or language.

Loving parents are the ones who are responsible for teaching their kids about religion and social issues.

74 gunjam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:31:51pm
His colleagues over at the high school, for instance, claim his teaching of evolution is so flawed they are forced to re-teach the subject to his students when they get into high school.

With such fetching concerns for "doctrinal purity," these teachers of evolutionary THEORY sound like purveyors of a secular catechism.

Plenty of teachers in the public schools today fail properly to impart knowledge of their subject matter to their students, but I don't recall their individual didactic failures' ever having been publicized in the national media.

That's because, unlike math and English, evolutionary THEORY is, at root,

religious

.

The implication here is that folks who are convinced of the truth of evolutionary THEORY seem to be insisting on the excommunication -- the PURGING, if you will -- of teachers who do not subscribe "from their hearts" to the prevailing "orthodoxy."

(Shades of the medieval Roman Catholic authorities who had Galileo imprisoned, perhaps? Or, better: The rise of a militant insistence on the enforcement of a secular evolutionary shari'a?)

Count me in as a supporter of John Freshwater.

75 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:32:12pm

re: #66 Dar ul Harb

South Park Evolution
I've had creationists post this to me on LGF thinking that they're mocking evolution.

76 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:32:41pm

re: #39 Killgore Trout

He's gaining defenders/obfuscators among lizards.

Not for long.

77 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:32:54pm

re: #69 jaunte

Is there any more detail about why Freshwater did this?

He was trying to develop an alternative to waterboarding?

78 darren  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:33:09pm

I agree with the poster in that there probably are a lot of guys out there. I grew up in a tiny town where my government school came under fire because they were leading prayers and were bringing in pastors for holiday assemblies. Somebody complained -- my mother :) -- and eventually the school had to remove all aspects of religion.

There was one science teacher who disagreed with not being able to teach "alternative theories" was to just not teach evolution all-together. Since it was a small town where everybody either didn't care or they agreed with him, he got away with it.

79 Attaboid  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:33:38pm

Two orange barrels and a window pain[sic]. Call me next week.

80 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:33:51pm

re: #74 gunjam

Dude, google scientific theory and refresh what you should have learned in 6th grade.

81 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:34:31pm
82 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:34:31pm

From a fax from an attorney representing anonymous plaintiffs. The fax read in part:


We are religious people, but we were offended when Mr. Freshwater burned a cross onto the arm of our child. This was done in science class in December 2007, where an electric shock machine was used to burn our child. The burn was severe enough that our child awoke that night with severe pain, and the cross remained there for several weeks. ... We have tried to keep this a private matter and hesitate to tell the whole story to the media for fear that we will be retaliated against.

"We are Christians who practice our faith where it belongs, at church and in our home and, most importantly, outside the public classroom, where the law requires a separation of church and state".

These folks get it. Too bad not everyone understands the role of public education.

83 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:34:34pm

re: #70 Alouette

Dilbert debates evolution

Thanks. That cute albino talking goiter changed my mind. I no longer believe in evolution.

84 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:34:39pm

re: #73 David Simon

I have no problem with this teacher being fired. Schools are places of learning, not indoctrination centers.

Let's rid the schools of the Freshwaters, and the teachers who "teach" man-made global warming nonsense; and Joannie has two mommies; and "compassion" for the "homeless"; and whatever the fuck else that has nothing to do with math or science or physical education or history or language.

Loving parents are the ones who are responsible for teaching their kids about religion and social issues.

I agree to a point.

I want the schools to teach some tolerance.

85 Dar ul Harb  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:35:23pm

re: #75 Killgore Trout

South Park Evolution
I've had creationists post this to me on LGF thinking that they're mocking evolution.

Aren't they mocking transgendered-American schoolteachers?

86 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:35:54pm

re: #53 Sharmuta

I suggest you read the link before you blame the victim.

I have read it, along with other material on the same story and I still find it suspicious.

1) I've been zapped with devices similar to what the teacher allegedly used and I've not been burned like that.

2) It doesn't look like a cross to me, it looks more like a freckled kid with a line down his arm that looks more to be the product of a burn from a heat source (like a soldering iron or hot wire, which I've also burned myself with.)

3) Kids will do all kinds of stupid things to themselves and then blame somebody else for it when their parents find out. I knew kids who ate chalk, stuck pins to their bare skin, shocked themselves with homemade tazers, let their friends drag them behind cars etc etc.

If somebody BURNED MY KID I would be all over that sonuvabitch in a heartbeat. I'm in no way trying to condone this teacher's actions but I am suspicious of this particular count against him. It's also possible that the teacher used the device and the kid later 'embellished' it in some other way.

87 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:36:07pm

re: #73 David Simon

I have no problem with this teacher being fired. Schools are places of learning, not indoctrination centers.

Let's rid the schools of the Freshwaters, and the teachers who "teach" man-made global warming nonsense; and Joannie has two mommies; and "compassion" for the "homeless"; and whatever the fuck else that has nothing to do with math or science or physical education or history or language.

Loving parents are the ones who are responsible for teaching their kids about religion and social issues.

Also, not every parent is a loving parent.

What about the children of those assholes?

88 MarkX  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:36:42pm

re: #64 godfrey

Because it evolved from a lone wolf?

Hey, leave my dog out of this.

He's a good boy and I know for a fact he evolved from humans.

89 Alouette  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:36:47pm
90 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:37:01pm

re: #59 Sharmuta

WTF are you basing your opinion that this kid did this to himself?

Quit blaming the victim!

Why am I not entitled to my opinion?

91 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:37:24pm

re: #86 NoSpam

So- you're still going to suspect the victim. Lovely.

92 BignJames  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:38:03pm

re: #84 MandyManners

I agree to a point.

I want the schools to teach some tolerance.

But they do.....you'd damn well better tolerate gays and jihadis...or else!

93 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:38:34pm

re: #74 gunjam

.Count me in as a supporter of John Freshwater.

ICK! ICK I say!

Just find the arguments you like to use the most when fighting evolution and defending intelligent design and read the responses here.
[Link: www.talkorigins.org...]

And if you're going to support John Freshwater, then I suppose you'll support the Muslims who murder non-Muslims, after all they have religion on their side too! And are you finally going to make a stand against those of us idiots who believe that Earth isn't the center of the universe or even our own solar system? I mean, after all, the Bible states several times how the Sun rotates around the Earth...or is THAT too literal for you?

94 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:38:40pm

I agree with all the talk about firing incompetant teachers. Teachers should TEACH, nothing else. But I have a question for my fellow lizards who have kids. Do any of you homeschool? Just curious.

95 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:39:02pm

re: #37 BignJames

I barely consider Va. the South.

I do.
The Occupied Zone around DC excepted, of course.

96 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:39:25pm

re: #75 Killgore Trout

South Park Evolution
I've had creationists post this to me on LGF thinking that they're mocking evolution.

I love that scene...

hee hee...fish squirrels...

97 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:39:43pm

re: #90 NoSpam

Because if you read the report- it sounds like there were witnesses. The other children described a cross. Why would a bunch of kids- some admitting they like this teacher- all lie about where the victim obtained this mark?

98 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:39:46pm

re: #94 chicagodudewhotrades

My wife and I have homeschooled all four of ours.

99 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:40:02pm
100 gunjam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:40:18pm

re: #80 Killgore Trout

re: #74 gunjam

Dude, google scientific theory and refresh what you should have learned in 6th grade.

Uh-huh. Seems I recall something about "predictable, repeatable" as hallmarks of true science.

Neither of those are true of your beloved theory of origins.

Nor do I claim they are true of ID or creationism.

Acceptance of either theory is at root: FAITH-based.

I truly get a laugh out of your faux air of intellectual superiority.

Sorry: Still not buying the evolutionary mess of pottage. ;-)

101 Alouette  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:40:26pm

re: #83 HelloDare

Thanks. That cute albino talking goiter changed my mind. I no longer believe in evolution.

It's a frickin CARTOON!

102 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:41:55pm
103 opnion  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:42:23pm

Sounds like this teacher really has issues.
The difference is that it is not some leftist, doing the idoctrination, which is more usual.
No matter who is doing this kind of stuff, it is wrong.

105 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:42:53pm

re: #101 Alouette

It's a frickin CARTOON!

I'm only KIDDING!

106 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:43:08pm

re: #94 chicagodudewhotrades

I agree with all the talk about firing incompetant teachers. Teachers should TEACH, nothing else. But I have a question for my fellow lizards who have kids. Do any of you homeschool? Just curious.

I home school. Reason: the screaming teacher was making my 12 year old son sick. He was getting A's but she was still taking out her aggression and hostility on the whole class. Said he couldn't take it any more. It's like those learned helplessness experiments where they shock the dogs who can't get away. After awhile the dogs become depressed and stop trying.

So we've been using a variety of materials. But I just discovered that my alma mater, BYU, has online classes for middle school students. They will give a whole semester of material, requiring several tests, and then the last test is proctored (supervised at a designated testing area.) It's $120/class in 7 subjects.

107 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:43:24pm

re: #69 jaunte

From the link:


Is there any more detail about why Freshwater did this?

I'm sure there will be more to come out about this case- only freshwater could tell us why he did this.

108 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:43:41pm

re: #74 gunjam

.
With such fetching concerns for "doctrinal purity," these teachers of evolutionary THEORY sound like purveyors of a secular catechism.

Plenty of teachers in the public schools today fail properly to impart knowledge of their subject matter to their students, but I don't recall their individual didactic failures' ever having been publicized in the national media.

The implication here is that folks who are convinced of the truth of evolutionary THEORY seem to be insisting on the excommunication -- the PURGING, if you will -- of teachers who do not subscribe "from their hearts" to the prevailing "orthodoxy."

(Shades of the medieval Roman Catholic authorities who had Galileo imprisoned, perhaps? Or, better: The rise of a militant insistence on the enforcement of a secular evolutionary shari'a?)

Count me in as a supporter of John Freshwater.

I think you have confused religion with science.

Parents and religious institutions are responsible for teaching faith and religion to their children, not schools and not teachers who may hold different faith beliefs than their students.

The thought that some school board or Dept of Education hack who has the authority to approve school curricula may end up approving a "faith"-based education that is different from your own - well, doesn't that frighten you at all?

Religion and religious belief belongs at church or in the home, not in school. This science teacher wasn't merely failing his students by failing to properly teach them science, he was indoctrinating them whatever faith beliefs he holds. I can't imagine why anyone would be for that.

109 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:44:18pm

re: #92 BignJames

But they do.....you'd damn well better tolerate gays and jihadis...or else!

Oh, stop with the hyperbole for a moment! Please.

Not every school system demads this.

Maybe it is time for parents whose kids are in such systems look to states where this is not happening.

110 Killian Bundy  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:44:19pm

Anyone else watching When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions on the Discovery channel?

Challenger crew, "alive until they hit the water".

/fortunately, presumed unconscious well before that

111 BignJames  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:44:40pm

re: #102 MandyManners

When I was a little bitty baby.


A++ for you ;)

112 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:45:16pm

re: #110 Killian Bundy

Anyone else watching When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions on the Discovery channel?

Challenger crew, "alive until they hit the water".

/fortunately, presumed unconscious well before that

Why would they have been unconscious?

113 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:45:21pm

sorry opnion

114 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:45:25pm

re: #86 NoSpam

If somebody BURNED MY KID I would be all over that sonuvabitch in a heartbeat. I'm in no way trying to condone this teacher's actions but I am suspicious of this particular count against him. It's also possible that the teacher used the device and the kid later 'embellished' it in some other way.

consider the climate in that lovely town and then tell me again you would go and be "all over that sonuvabitch".
Apparently Freshwater is wielding some considerable power in that town, together with 'Coach David' - does intimidation ring a bell?

115 Reno911  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:46:02pm

re: #48 taxfreekiller

Is that you VGER?

116 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:46:03pm

re: #74 gunjam

I find that you are of the same intellect of the poster who thinks that ripping a clitoris out by the roots is the same as a superficial burn to an arm.

117 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:46:10pm

re: #86 NoSpam

I have read it, along with other material on the same story and I still find it suspicious.

3) Kids will do all kinds of stupid things to themselves and then blame somebody else for it when their parents find out. I knew kids who ate chalk, stuck pins to their bare skin, shocked themselves with homemade tazers, let their friends drag them behind cars etc etc..

The cross-burning onto the arm wasn't just made up. There was an investigation:


The organization that investigated Mr. Freshwater was HR on Call, a human resources company. It took all of May and most of June to pour over the records, interview people, and otherwise research the matter. Yesterday, the Company released it’s report. Among the findings:

•Mr. Freshwater did burn a cross onto the complaining family’s child’s arm using an electrostatic device not designed for that purpose

118 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:46:20pm

re: #109 MandyManners

Oh, stop with the hyperbole for a moment! Please.

Not every school system demads this.

Maybe it is time for parents whose kids are in such systems look to states where this is not happening.

When i was interning at the middle school the counselor told me: Wait until health class where I tell them about blow jobs. This to 6th graders.

119 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:46:25pm

re: #84 MandyManners

I agree to a point.

I want the schools to teach some tolerance.

What can the schools teach that you can't?

120 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:46:39pm

re: #100 gunjam

Uh-huh. Seems I recall something about "predictable, repeatable" as hallmarks of true science.

Neither of those are true of your beloved theory of origins.

Nor do I claim they are true of ID or creationism.

Acceptance of either theory is at root: FAITH-based.

I truly get a laugh out of your faux air of intellectual superiority.

Sorry: Still not buying the evolutionary mess of pottage. ;-)

The observations made by scientists are repeatable. There are many "theories" we accept as fact thanks to the magic of observation. For instance, we know that the sun transmits heat without the benefit of a medium like air, water or solid matter. Heat reaches the Earth through the vacuum of space and thanks to the wonders of sight we see the correlation between light and temperature. You don't have to make your own sun to prove that heat comes from the sun, nor do you have to evolve your own species from scratch to observe the numerous examples of micro and macro evolution.

If you can accept something as silly as the idea that God would create a system that relied upon Darwinian principles like "survival of the fittest" while at the same time denying the consequences of said system, for the life of me I can't figure out why you can't just assume that God is smarter and wiser than anyone who ever had their hand on a quill and holy parchment and INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED THE SYSTEM OF EVOLUTION!

121 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:46:58pm

re: #91 Sharmuta

So- you're still going to suspect the victim. Lovely.

In this case, yes. I've offered up my evidence for all to see. Assault is a serious charge, especially when it comes to an authority figure assaulting a minor. I was also suspicious when the news of the Duke rape case came out. Were those boys guilty of piss-poor judgement? Yes. But rape? No. And now, even though they've been cleared of it that case will be a stigma that haunts them for the rest of their lives. I'm not saying the accusation is malicious, but I thing something is wrong.

If this kid was burned so bad why would his parents wait so long unless something else is going on with this whole mess that they're not mentioning? I do not know, nor have I met, a single parent on this planet that would not react immediately if their child was assaulted by a teacher in such a manner.

It also takes a lot more than a little gun like that to leave a burn like that, in my experience. That burn looks more like the time I stabbed myself with a soldering iron.

122 BignJames  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:47:07pm

re: #109 MandyManners


I was being facetious...is there a tag for that?

123 Killian Bundy  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:47:26pm

re: #112 DistantThunder

Why would they have been unconscious?

/no cabin pressurization, freefall from 67,000 feet?

124 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:47:28pm

re: #116 MandyManners

I find that you are of the same intellect of the poster who thinks that ripping a clitoris out by the roots is the same as a superficial burn to an arm.

This has got to be a more interesting site than the KosKiddies. Notice no one mentions DU anymore.

Oblivion.

125 darren  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:48:15pm

re: #100 gunjam
Acceptance of either theory is at root: FAITH-based.

Everything related to evolution is tied to reality. You can point out at the world and say, "Look at this... evolution." There's no faith involved.

126 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:49:22pm

re: #19 NoSpam

What gets me about this story is that they're running this guy into the ground while teachers with liberal agendas get a free ticket to brainwash students.

Don't get me wrong, I think this teacher is a jerk and should get fired (though I do suspect embellishment on the cross-burning story as I've played with those guns before and have never heard of one leaving a mark) But I believe in equal treatment for douchebaggery in all its forms, especially when it comes to the education of our kids. Case in point: Did Mr. "Jesus Glasses" out in California get fired?

Ward Churchill didn't get a pass here or many other places.

127 godfrey  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:49:43pm

re: #108 reine.de.tout

I agree. It's interesting that Freshwater chose to burn the cross into the child, as if it were indelible. That smacks of desperation.

There's this idea out there that everything was better in the Norman Rockwell Christian Past, when all public schools began with compulsory prayer, and the center held because, dammit, the authorities held it there.

Seems to me the root impulse in Freshwater is panic: total fear that the power of the theistic message is being lost, that it needs to be burned into the youth by force or it will never "stick."

To me, this turn to force means that Freshwater actually lacks an intelligent faith. A faith that relies on force is a fearful, empty faith.

It burns him, so he acts out.

Just a theory.

128 BignJames  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:50:08pm

re: #123 Killian Bundy

Wonder what kind of g-forces a blast like that would produce?

129 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:50:39pm

re: #97 Sharmuta

Because if you read the report- it sounds like there were witnesses. The other children described a cross. Why would a bunch of kids- some admitting they like this teacher- all lie about where the victim obtained this mark?


You'd be surprised at what kids are capable of. When I was in middle school one ignorant little troll and her bitch friends conspired to get me in trouble for assault by making up a story together (by all saying I attacked someone whom I had no contact with). Fortunately it didn't work.

Also, the picture of the injury doesn't look like a cross. I have no doubt that the teacher used the instrument on the kid, but did he actually hurt the kid is a different story. Again, call me a conspiracy nut, but I suspect something is being left out of these articles.

130 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:50:44pm

re: #94 chicagodudewhotrades

Nope. Dumber than a sack of hammers here.

131 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:51:33pm

From the Talkorigins website, since the damn thread has gone off-topic with the debate of evolution vs. intelligent design when it should be about STUPID TEACHERS GETTING AWAY WITH MURDER!

Whatever:

"The terms used in design theory are not defined. "Design", in design theory, has nothing to do with "design" as it is normally understood. Design is defined in terms of an agent purposely arranging something, but such a concept appears nowhere in the process of distinguishing design in the sense of "intelligent design." Dembski defined design in terms of what it is not (known regularity and chance), making intelligent design an argument from incredulity; he never said what design is.

A solution to a problem must address the parameters of the problem, or it is just irrelevant hand waving. Any theory about design must somehow address the agent and purpose, or it is not really about design. No intelligent design theorist has ever included agent or purpose in any attempt at a scientific theory of design, and some explicitly say they cannot be included (Dembski 2002, 313). Thus, even if intelligent design theory were able to prove design, it would mean practically nothing; it would certainly say nothing whatsoever about design in the usual sense.

Irreducible complexity also fails as science because it, too, is an argument from incredulity that has nothing to do with design.


Intelligent design is subjective. Even in Dembski's mathematically intricate formulation, the specification of his specified complexity can be determined after the fact, making "specification" a subjective concept. Dembski now talks of "apparent specified complexity" versus "actual specified complexity," of which only the latter indicates design. However, it is impossible to distinguish between the two in principle (Elsberry n.d.).


Intelligent design implies results that are contrary to common sense. Spider webs apparently meet the standards of specified complexity, which implies that spiders are intelligent. One could instead claim that the complexity was designed into the spider and its abilities. But if that claim is made, one might just as well claim that the spider's designer was not intelligent but was intelligently designed, or maybe it was the spider's designer's designer that was intelligent. Thus, either spiders are intelligent, or intelligent design theory reduces to a weak Deism where all design might have entered into the universe only once at the beginning, or terms like "specified complexity" have no useful definition.


The intelligent design movement is not intended to be about science. Phillip Johnson, who spearheaded and led the movement, said in so many words that it is about religion and philosophy, not science (Belz 1996). "

132 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:51:42pm

re: #110 Killian Bundy


When autopsy's were performed it was learned the crew had drowned. The explosion knocked them all unconscious but they were all alive when the crew compartment fell from the sky and hit the ocean.

133 opnion  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:52:01pm

re: #113 mama winger

sorry opnion

Thank you. Can't figure out why the Sox look so bad.
Taking nothing away from, the Cubs but the Sox have got to act like they successfully located the ball park.

134 Killian Bundy  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:52:30pm

re: #128 BignJames

Wonder what kind of g-forces a blast like that would produce?

/the vehicle continued to climb for 18,000 feet

135 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:52:44pm

re: #133 opnion

Thank you. Can't figure out why the Sox look so bad.
Taking nothing away from, the Cubs but the Sox have got to act like they successfully located the ball park.

Maybe it's because Ozzie hates Wrigley.

136 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:53:03pm

re: #126 Thanos

Ward Churchill didn't get a pass here or many other places.


Unfortunately, in the grand picture, he is the exception and not the rule for bad teachers getting their comeuppance. Also, he still rakes in $$ from speaking engagements and similar things.

137 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:53:10pm

re: #118 DistantThunder

When i was interning at the middle school the counselor told me: Wait until health class where I tell them about blow jobs. This to 6th graders.

I'm talking about school systems in other states.

138 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:53:41pm

Now here's something I hope you really like - Rocky, the squirrel

Getting Older, Getting Better
Keep having great sex, or even better sex

by David Schnarch

An old joke asks, What's the best form of birth control in later adult life? The answer: nudity.

So goes the cultural stereotype of sex after, say, 45. What it hinges on, says David Schnarch, is sheer misunderstanding--"the piece-of-meat model of sexual intimacy" most people practice.

It equates physical contact, and anatomy, with sex. And it is undoubtedly related to sex-text claims that males reach their sexual prime in late adolescence while women reach theirs several years later.

But sex manuals don't tell what Schnarch has discovered in over 20 years as a sex therapist--we reach genital prime and sexual prime at vastly different ages. Most people don't reach their sexual prime until their 40s and 50s. "Sexual intensity is more a function of emotional maturation than of physiological responsiveness."

Great sex requires real intimacy--the process of being in touch with oneself in the presence of a partner. Older people have learned more about themselves, so they bring more self to the party.

"The later adult years are when the most important exploration of sexual potential occurs," Schnarch reports. Younger women struggle to balance displays of eroticism with fears of looking cheap. Younger men are "threatened by a self-motivated and sexually knowledgeable partner."


Read on.....

139 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:53:53pm

re: #121 NoSpam

The video in this link suggests it was more than one student.

140 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:53:56pm

re: #87 MandyManners

Also, not every parent is a loving parent.

What about the children of those assholes?

True. But we can't promulgate good parenting. We can only punish those who cross the line. And remove the incentive for those who would wield their children as meal tickets (i.e. get rid of welfare yesterday).

As for their progeny, we're the most generous country in the world ($300 billion per annum donated to various charities). There's no perfect solution, but let's do our best to remove government from the equation.

141 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:54:32pm

re: #94 chicagodudewhotrades

I agree with all the talk about firing incompetant teachers. Teachers should TEACH, nothing else. But I have a question for my fellow lizards who have kids. Do any of you homeschool? Just curious.

I do.

142 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:54:38pm

re: #115 Reno911

I get that! Funny!

143 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:55:04pm

re: #119 David Simon

What can the schools teach that you can't?


Well, I don't have 15 kids in my home.

Oh, for fuck's sake.

What the hell is wrong with teaching kids to be polite?

144 opnion  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:55:13pm

re: #135 mama winger

Maybe it's because Ozzie hates Wrigley.


Interesting. Some kind of weird payback by a scorned ballpark.
Steven King could do something with that.

145 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:55:41pm

re: #141 wolfie

I do.

I didn't. My kids threatened to run away from home if they had to be stuck with me all day and night. I might have run away myself.

Christian schools.

146 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:56:00pm

I cannot catch up.

I must be a must-tard.

147 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:56:16pm

re: #139 Sharmuta

The lawsuit also mentions "at least two eigth-grade students."

In December 2007, the complaint continues, Freshwater burned an easily identifiable cross into the arm of at least two eighth-grade students with an electric device manufactured by Electro-Technic Products Inc. The complaint states, “Mr. Freshwater knew that the electric device, model BD-10A, could cause harm if placed in contact with human skin. As the eighth-grade science teacher it is Mr. Freshwater’s duty to understand and follow the manufacturer’s advice regarding the proper use of science equipment.”


[Link: www.mountvernonnews.com...]

148 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:56:21pm

re: #132 chicagodudewhotrades

When autopsy's were performed it was learned the crew had drowned. The explosion knocked them all unconscious but they were all alive when the crew compartment fell from the sky and hit the ocean.

oh dear Lord, I hope they didn't regain consciousness as they were drowning.

149 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:56:29pm

re: #144 opnion

Interesting. Some kind of weird payback by a scorned ballpark.
Steven King could do something with that.

The Ghosts of Wrigley, featuring Jack Brickhouse and Harry Carey.

150 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:57:23pm

re: #139 Sharmuta

The video in this link suggests it was more than one student.


That's strange, because in every other report I've seen on this (from several different networks) they only refer to the one student, but my conspiracy-wrangling still stands. If he was burning these kids bad enough to cause pain, blistering, discoloration and temporary scarring, then why is it only being brought up just now, a long time after the fact.

151 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:57:57pm

Here's another video on John Freshwater also stating it was more than one student.

152 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:58:06pm

re: #150 NoSpam

That's strange, because in every other report I've seen on this (from several different networks) they only refer to the one student, but my conspiracy-wrangling still stands. If he was burning these kids bad enough to cause pain, blistering, discoloration and temporary scarring, then why is it only being brought up just now, a long time after the fact.

Are criminal charges being brought?

153 nyc redneck  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:58:22pm

i'm tired of mr. freshwater.
i'm going to go watch a monster movie.
creature of the black lagoon.

154 opnion  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:58:28pm

re: #149 mama winger

The Ghosts of Wrigley, featuring Jack Brickhouse and Harry Carey.


Now that would be good. Afterward, Harry would wind up on Rush Street.

155 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:58:55pm

re: #154 opnion

Now that would be good. Afterward, Harry would wind up on Rush Street.

OMG - can you picture it?

giggle

156 goddessoftheclassroom  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:59:03pm

re: #121 NoSpam

In this case, yes. I've offered up my evidence for all to see. Assault is a serious charge, especially when it comes to an authority figure assaulting a minor. I was also suspicious when the news of the Duke rape case came out. Were those boys guilty of piss-poor judgement? Yes. But rape? No. And now, even though they've been cleared of it that case will be a stigma that haunts them for the rest of their lives. I'm not saying the accusation is malicious, but I thing something is wrong.

If this kid was burned so bad why would his parents wait so long unless something else is going on with this whole mess that they're not mentioning? I do not know, nor have I met, a single parent on this planet that would not react immediately if their child was assaulted by a teacher in such a manner.

It also takes a lot more than a little gun like that to leave a burn like that, in my experience. That burn looks more like the time I stabbed myself with a soldering iron.

I have also seen kids with similar burns caused by rubbing an eraser on their skin.

I am NOT suggesting that this exonerates this teacher--he should be fired for, at the very least, insubordination and not following the approved curriculum. I also believe he did create the shape of a cross on the kid's arm. I'm just not convinced his actions were all there were.

157 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:59:09pm

re: #136 NoSpam

Unfortunately, in the grand picture, he is the exception and not the rule for bad teachers getting their comeuppance. Also, he still rakes in $$ from speaking engagements and similar things.

and you don't think this guy won't become a martyr to the kooks and do the same? Have you read much about Dauber? I can educate you.

158 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:59:27pm
159 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:59:46pm

re: #153 nyc redneck

i'm tired of mr. freshwater.
i'm going to go watch a monster movie.
creature of the black lagoon.

Me too. Only the game instead of the movie.

See you tomorrow guys.

Chin up, opnion. It's only June and the Sox are still in first place.

160 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 6:59:55pm

re: #150 NoSpam
again:
consider the climate in that lovely town and then tell me again you would go and be "all over that sonuvabitch".
Apparently Freshwater is wielding some considerable power in that town, together with 'Coach David' - does intimidation ring a bell?

161 MandyManners  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:00:10pm

re: #140 David Simon

True. But we can't promulgate good parenting. We can only punish those who cross the line. And remove the incentive for those who would wield their children as meal tickets (i.e. get rid of welfare yesterday).

As for their progeny, we're the most generous country in the world ($300 billion per annum donated to various charities). There's no perfect solution, but let's do our best to remove government from the equation.

Oh, David.

Welfare is not a guarantee for life.

The shit I've seen in the baseball league.... Amazing.

162 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:00:11pm
163 opnion  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:00:13pm

re: #155 mama winger

OMG - can you picture it?

giggle


Well sure, why not? In Chicago the dead can vote, why not go out for cocktails?

164 opnion  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:01:13pm

re: #159 mama winger

Me too. Only the game instead of the movie.

See you tomorrow guys.

Chin up, opnion. It's only June and the Sox are still in first place.


Thats my plan. Good night.

165 hermeneutics  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:02:11pm

re: #94 chicagodudewhotrades

I agree with all the talk about firing incompetant teachers. Teachers should TEACH, nothing else. But I have a question for my fellow lizards who have kids. Do any of you homeschool? Just curious.

I home school. My career may be going down the drain in order to school my kids, but at least they are well-educated. Its a trade-off, sadly.

ID isn't an issue for us.

166 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:02:14pm
167 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:02:48pm

From the article at the link, we learn that a group called "Minutemen United" has come to this teacher's aid.

A spokesperson for that group is David Daubenmire, who said this:

. . . John Freshwater is teaching the beliefs and values that the majority of people in this community agree with.

Without realizing it, Mr. Daubenmire made the case for those wanting Mr. Freshwater out of the classroom. If what Mr. Freshwater is teaching is the beliefs of the majority in the community, what about those who do not agree with the beliefs of John Freshwater? Why should those parents be forced to put up with having their children taught John Freshwater's religion, rather than their own beliefs?

168 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:03:04pm

re: #147 jaunte

In December 2007, the complaint continues, Freshwater burned an easily identifiable cross into the arm of at least two eighth-grade students with an electric device manufactured by Electro-Technic Products Inc. The complaint states, “Mr. Freshwater knew that the electric device, model BD-10A, could cause harm if placed in contact with human skin. As the eighth-grade science teacher it is Mr. Freshwater’s duty to understand and follow the manufacturer’s advice regarding the proper use of science equipment.”

Thank you, jaunte.

169 gunjam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:03:48pm

re: #93 DeathtotheSwiss


And if you're going to support John Freshwater, then I suppose you'll support the Muslims who murder non-Muslims, after all they have religion on their side too!

Nonsense. On the contrary, the hysterical tone regarding the possibility of ID "heresies'" being taught represented by the posted article about Freshwater (or, for that matter, by the comments left by certain of the posters on this thread) is frighteningly reminiscent of Islamists insisting on their -- and ONLY their -- preferred point of view being taught.

What you fail to grasp is that this very fanatical insistence on the teaching of one and ONLY one UNPROVEN theory of origins as SCIENCE in our schools is RELIGIOUS in nature.

And, yes: I am an APOSTATE when it comes to evolutionary THEORY!

And are you finally going to make a stand against those of us idiots who believe that Earth isn't the center of the universe or even our own solar system? I mean, after all, the Bible states several times how the Sun rotates around the Earth...or is THAT too literal for you?

Wow! I love your faux biblical scholarship. Shall we not, at a minimum, extend to the biblical writers at least the same degree of latitude that we do operators of such "Christian" Web sites as www.weather.com, whence I just copied the following words:

Sunset: 8:37 PM

Sunrise: 6:35 AM

Sunset: 8:37 PM

?

170 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:04:04pm

re: #167 reine.de.tout

Without realizing it, Mr. Daubenmire made the case for those wanting Mr. Freshwater out of the classroom. If what Mr. Freshwater is teaching is the beliefs of the majority in the community, what about those who do not agree with the beliefs of John Freshwater? Why should those parents be forced to put up with having their children taught John Freshwater's religion, rather than their own beliefs?

That's just it, reine. The Constitution was designed to protect the minority!

171 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:04:06pm

re: #152 mama winger

Are criminal charges being brought?

I'm not 100% sure but it sounds more like the parents are suing over the presence of religious materials/ the teacher's pushing of his own beliefs rather than pressing charges for assault, which is what I'd be doing if somebody burned my kid like that. They even mention "defiance of school policy”

and

In the fax, the parents also said, “We are Christians who practice our faith where it belongs, at church and in our home and, most importantly, outside the public classroom, where the law requires a separation of church and state.”

They're more concerned with church and state than the fact that their kid has second degree burns?

172 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:04:21pm

re: #100 gunjam


Neither of those are true of your beloved theory of origins.


Wrong! You guys need new talking points. This has been debunked ad nauseum here. If you don't understand this now you never will. You are free to continue your dead end ideology, just don't expect to drag the rest of us into the dust bin of history with you.

173 goddessoftheclassroom  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:04:37pm

re: #143 MandyManners

Well, I don't have 15 kids in my home.

Oh, for fuck's sake.

What the hell is wrong with teaching kids to be polite?

BWA HA HA!

I insist on good manners from my students. They MUST say "May I" and "please" before I'll give them permission to leave the room. I strongly encourage their use of "Ma'am" and lavish praise on them when they do use it (here in PA it's not the cultural norm it is in VA). They MUST remain seated until I dismiss them after the bell has rung. They may not chew gum in my presence (they'll even get rid of it if they're in another room I happen to walk into at another time of the day!)

A good example of speech, manners, and reasoning is the best lesson I can give.

174 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:04:40pm
175 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:05:15pm

re: #157 Thanos

and you don't think this guy won't become a martyr to the kooks and do the same? Have you read much about Dauber? I can educate you.


He probably will. I never said he wouldn't. I just think more lefties get a pass than 'conservative' wingnuts.

176 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:06:33pm
177 jcw46  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:07:14pm

re: #29 june_july

The religious zealotry of a few Christian teachers is not one of the major reasons for students in the U.S.A being scholastically deficient compared to other countries. The N.E.A. with it's primary goal of protecting the products of the "Education and Liberal Arts" curricula spewed forth by the secular progressive bastions of tenured Marxists and other Western Civilization deconstructionists masquerading as "Higher Learning" is the root cause of the failure for a large number of students to learn how to think for themselves.
If a foreign country was found to be the source of a similar undermining of the educational system in the U.S.A. as that accomplished nationwide by the N.E.A., it would be cause for war. That so many students do manage to become educated to any degree is a testament to their parents and the values and guidance that they have given their children.

178 hermeneutics  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:07:34pm

re: #156 goddessoftheclassroom

I have also seen kids with similar burns caused by rubbing an eraser on their skin.

I am NOT suggesting that this exonerates this teacher--he should be fired for, at the very least, insubordination and not following the approved curriculum. I also believe he did create the shape of a cross on the kid's arm. I'm just not convinced his actions were all there were.

I've taught at a huge state university and have seen many students with "temporary cuttings" and "temporary tats." In fact, it is a popular fad. I've seen them do it with erasers, Goddess, but usually they use more sophisticated instruments like a Dremel (I think). Seriously, they put some sort of little sandpaper on the end and "burn" their skin in a design. Crosses are very popular, particularly on one's calf. The scars, though, are not deep. I'm sure/hope they disappear after a few months or years.

179 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:07:46pm

Eigth grade peer pressure mode:
Can't imagine being the eighth grader who would wimp out and complain about a little burn when I could tough it out and prove I'm a man, like Mr. Freshwater.
/

180 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:08:05pm

re: #160 2by2

again:
consider the climate in that lovely town and then tell me again you would go and be "all over that sonuvabitch".
Apparently Freshwater is wielding some considerable power in that town, together with 'Coach David' - does intimidation ring a bell?


I'm not the sort to be 'intimidated.' I've dealt with enough bullies in my life to not really give two shakes about other people's opinions, and I have little respect for people who think in a herd. If someone assaulted my kid, charges would be brought.

181 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:08:47pm

re: #177 jcw46

New math...Just like New Coke, and we all know how that turned out.

182 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:08:57pm

re: #170 Sharmuta

That's just it, reine. The Constitution was designed to protect the minority!

Well, exactly, I hope I wasn't unclear.

183 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:09:27pm

NoSpam, did you vote for Ron Paul like Daubenmire did?

184 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:10:03pm

Just spun this off upstairs.

Put oil firm chiefs on trial, says NASA climate change scientist.

James Hansen, one of the world's leading climate scientists, will today call for the chief executives of large fossil fuel companies to be put on trial for high crimes against humanity and nature, accusing them of actively spreading doubt about global warming in the same way that tobacco companies blurred the links between smoking and cancer.

Hansen will use the symbolically charged 20th anniversary of his groundbreaking speech to the US Congress - in which he was among the first to sound the alarm over the reality of global warming - to argue that radical steps need to be taken immediately if the "perfect storm" of irreversible climate change is not to become inevitable.

Speaking before Congress again, he will accuse the chief executive officers of companies such as ExxonMobil and Peabody Energy of being fully aware of the disinformation about climate change they are spreading.

185 goddessoftheclassroom  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:10:38pm

re: #182 reine.de.tout

Well, exactly, I hope I wasn't unclear.

Bottom line: science isn't a popularity contest! It doesn't have anything to do with majorities or minorities or beliefs--it has to do with FACTS.

186 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:11:07pm

re: #145 mama winger

I didn't. My kids threatened to run away from home if they had to be stuck with me all day and night. I might have run away myself.

Christian schools.

It's a challenge!
My oldest two are in a Catholic High School now, and the younger ones are 11 and 13. So I'm at an easy stage of the game now..................except for the damned relief map of the Indian sub-continent on the dining room table.....and a few too many things like that!

5-0........but they could still flub it 6-5

187 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:11:17pm

What if the kid is a vampire, and the teacher accidently touched him with a crucifix?...huh? What about that?

188 ratherdashing  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:12:17pm

As a Christian, I don't see how what this teacher was doing is a good example for our Lord. Christ was interested in relationships, not debates on science. Mr. Freshwater had a job to do as a teacher. If he could not teach what his superiors directed him to teach, then he should have removed himself from the classroom and sought another profession. At least, he should have found another subject to teach.

side note:
I will most likely be in Mt. Vernon Ohio this week on business. Maybe I can get a little more detail on this story and share it with LGF. There is a strong Christian community there. Mt. Vernon Nazarene College is right next to the High School and Jr. High.

189 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:12:24pm

re: #180 NoSpam

good for you,
but maybe the parents of these kids aren't, and take into account that they essential believe the same than Freshwater, maybe they covered up for him in good faith, only to see that he continues to do his 'science experiments' on their kids.

190 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:13:24pm
Teachers entrusted to teach science are instead teaching creationism and intelligent design.


The horror, the horror! This is the SAME American school system that became the envy of the world because for a hundred years the Bible was part of basic curricula, and the Bible-based McGuffy Reader was the main text book for teaching reading. Look at our secular based schools now, anyone envy them?

Teaching your kid how to unroll a condom on a cucumber is far more likely than to ever see a Bible on a teacher's desk. I am surprised the Taliban secularists haven't had this guy roped to a tree and whipped. No defense of this guy really, but the faux outrage and outright hatred of any Christianity in the classroom is peculiar in a nation that would not even exist, except as another tyranny in the earth, if it wasn't for Christianity.

And if we are so concerned "science" be taught in the classroom, somebody dig up a transitory species fossil please. And why can you found an entire science on the bones of men like beings that would not fill the bed of a small pick-up truck? At least I can see the radition through all written human history of the events bespoke in the Bible. All the evolutionist have is a red-faced chourous shouting "evolution is a fact, evolution is a fact," whenever anything, or anyone does not accept the weak, and even non-existent science to prove such momentous claims.

At least in all the other "sciences" I can repeat in the lab, or have mathematical formula to test my hypothesis. Electro-chemical bonds care less if I am an agnostic, Muslim, Christian, or atheist, they work the same, the math is the same. Ask an evolutionist: where the hell is the MATH? Show me the math the elucidates species evolving from other species?

O and for the kid? They showed that cross on his arm on the news, I couldn't see it, but I guess it was there. O, the outcry we will hear when this kid goes and gets a full-sleeve tattoo, and body piercings. Right? Right? Or if in Boulder Colorado they bring in a panel that encourages kids to experiment with any and all types of sexual relationships...after all they were just reflecting the "values" of that community, the only one outraged was Bill Reilly.

191 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:14:48pm

re: #186 wolfie

it has to do with FACTS

Eventually. See post #184

192 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:14:57pm
193 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:15:18pm

ATTN: creationists...
Why Islam stinks
In about the 11th century Islam decided that imperical knowledge and the Greek philosophers were wrong because they excluded the Quran and the supernatural works of Allah in their teaching. They completely skipped the Enlightenment. Even today they will defend any Muslim simply because he's Muslim. They will always play the victim card. Why are Creationists so eager to repeat the mistakes of Islam? Christianity is in a tough spot in the Western world, this isn't the best time to be stupid.

194 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:15:29pm

re: #175 NoSpam

He probably will. I never said he wouldn't. I just think more lefties get a pass than 'conservative' wingnuts.

11 years there have been complaints against this man. 11 years! Seems to me he's been given a pass long enough.

195 Cartman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:15:38pm

Well, I learned something this evening. Never, ever bake Mahi. The fish evolved soley to be grilled or broiled. I won't make that mistake again. ;)

196 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:15:39pm

The sound of one man going to bed...
"G'night Erin. G'night Jason"!

197 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:15:56pm

re: #183 Thanos

NoSpam, did you vote for Ron Paul like Daubenmire did?

No. Har-har.

198 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:16:22pm

I wish there was anthing funny about this topic. Sadly, that's just not the case.

199 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:16:26pm
200 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:16:33pm
201 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:16:52pm

re: #189 2by2

good for you,
but maybe the parents of these kids aren't, and take into account that they essential believe the same than Freshwater, maybe they covered up for him in good faith, only to see that he continues to do his 'science experiments' on their kids.

Back - commercial

I think once a crime of assault has been committed on a child, it is out of the hands of the parents as to whether or not to press charges. The state has an interest in protecting that child. I don't think it would matter if the parents were reluctant or not . The state would be obligated to pursue it.

202 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:17:01pm

re: #173 goddessoftheclassroom

A good example of speech, manners, and reasoning is the best lesson I can give.

I love that choice of words. I was a terrible student until my senior year of high school. Along came a smart, poised, savvy teacher who I wanted to emulate. That's what turned me from a juvenile delinquent into...well, we'll just leave it at that.

203 hermeneutics  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:17:18pm

re: #181 NoSpam

New math...Just like New Coke, and we all know how that turned out.

Interesting you bring up new math. I just found one of my father's old college textbooks entitled, "Theory of Math." Absolutely fascinating -- well-written and carefully documented.

Then I compared it to my son's calculus textbook. The calc book has bright colors. Pictures. Sidebars. Graphs. The goal of the calc book is to teach HOW to think about math, but not math itself. In contrast, the goal of my father's textbook was to present math as theory. The student was expected to think on his/her own.

204 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:17:26pm

re: #188 ratherdashing

Great! It would be interesting to know what ordinary folks there are saying......waitresses, motel clerks, cashiers, etc.

205 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:17:29pm

re: #195 Cartman

I'm getting ready to experiment with Rock fish on the BBQ tonight. I generally don't do fish over coals because it's so unpredictable. Wish me luck.

206 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:17:49pm
207 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:17:51pm

re: #177 jcw46

The religious zealotry of a few Christian teachers is not one of the major reasons for students in the U.S.A being scholastically deficient compared to other countries. The N.E.A. with it's primary goal of protecting the products of the "Education and Liberal Arts" curricula spewed forth by the secular progressive bastions of tenured Marxists and other Western Civilization deconstructionists masquerading as "Higher Learning" is the root cause of the failure for a large number of students to learn how to think for themselves.
If a foreign country was found to be the source of a similar undermining of the educational system in the U.S.A. as that accomplished nationwide by the N.E.A., it would be cause for war. That so many students do manage to become educated to any degree is a testament to their parents and the values and guidance that they have given their children.

Government consistently creates shortages, in this case, of qualified, competent, engaging, morally upright (not seducing their students, or posting nude pictures of themselves as strippers on myspace) teachers.

208 freetoken  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:17:54pm

re: #184 HelloDare

Probability that what the Guardian says will happen, and what will really happen, is greater than 0. In this case, it will be the "court of public opinion" in which Hansen will try to convince.

It's not really the same thing as a teacher burning a teenager.

209 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:18:01pm

out again

sorry - shouldn't post and run :(

210 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:18:29pm

re: #201 mama winger

I would hope it does just that, this guy needs to do some time.

211 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:18:39pm

re: #194 Sharmuta

11 years there have been complaints against this man. 11 years! Seems to me he's been given a pass long enough.

I'n not quite getting why, because I an somewhat suspicious of ONE particular complaint, and have mentioned repeatedly in this thread that I think this teacher is a jerk who deserves to be fired, that I somehow think he should be exonerated of all charges?

Also, I just got accused of being a Paulbot. Nice...

212 Cartman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:18:56pm

re: #203 hermeneutics

The student was expected to think on his/her own.

My...what a novel idea.

213 lawhawk  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:19:09pm

This "teacher" would not have made news but for an assault on a student. His inability to teach students and prepare them for high school and beyond is criminal enough, but it took a premeditated assault on a student to get the administration to take action.

That's a sad state of affairs that is far too prevalent throughout the country. Only when things get so bad is action taken, and by then the damage is done and countless students have been screwed out of a proper learning environment.

214 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:19:10pm

re: #202 David Simon

I love that choice of words. I was a terrible student until my senior year of high school. Along came a smart, poised, savvy teacher who I wanted to emulate. That's what turned me from a juvenile delinquent into...well, we'll just leave it at that.

Now that's just amazing. i always wonder why all the persuasion over the years doesn't break through, and then one day, all the peices fall into place.

215 Ojoe  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:19:16pm

This is exactly the face of 'religion' that the 1st Amendment was intended to guard against.

And in fact, the very first sentence of the First Amendment.

Watch Out

216 Cartman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:19:50pm

re: #205 Killgore Trout

I'm getting ready to experiment with Rock fish on the BBQ tonight. I generally don't do fish over coals because it's so unpredictable. Wish me luck.

Man, that sounds good. Don't blow it!

217 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:20:28pm

re: #213 lawhawk

This "teacher" would not have made news but for an assault on a student. His inability to teach students and prepare them for high school and beyond is criminal enough, but it took a premeditated assault on a student to get the administration to take action.

That's a sad state of affairs that is far too prevalent throughout the country. Only when things get so bad is action taken, and by then the damage is done and countless students have been screwed out of a proper learning environment.

Excellent point!

218 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:20:42pm
219 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:20:57pm

re: #203 hermeneutics

Interesting you bring up new math. I just found one of my father's old college textbooks entitled, "Theory of Math." Absolutely fascinating -- well-written and carefully documented.

Then I compared it to my son's calculus textbook. The calc book has bright colors. Pictures. Sidebars. Graphs. The goal of the calc book is to teach HOW to think about math, but not math itself. In contrast, the goal of my father's textbook was to present math as theory. The student was expected to think on his/her own.

I had a mix of textbooks in college, and generally found the 'older' ones to be much more informative. My Diff Eq book was just abut worthless, while my structural mechanics book (which was a new edition of a text from ~1930's) was great.

220 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:21:15pm

re: #211 NoSpam

I'n not quite getting why, because I an somewhat suspicious of ONE particular complaint, and have mentioned repeatedly in this thread that I think this teacher is a jerk who deserves to be fired, that I somehow think he should be exonerated of all charges?

Also, I just got accused of being a Paulbot. Nice...

No you didn't, it was a question. Thanks for answering.

221 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:21:20pm

re: #169 gunjam

So what theory do you propose? Or are you saying that there is no theory that can explain the questions that evolution tries to answer without previously knowing information that has been passed down for a little over two thousand years? Dinosaurs are just God's little mysteries designed to mess with our heads? Carbon-dating is wrong because, after all, it goes against the idea that Adam and Eve existed as anything but the literal interpretation.

Here's a few points, not my own creation (ha) but agreed with nonetheless. My big thing is mainly that you can't interpret the Bible as literal and as complete fact unless you want to start stoning children for talking back to their parents.

* From the Annotated Bible for Skeptic's
The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants before any animals. The order of events known from science is just the opposite.
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the sun and the stars) until the fourth day
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

And how could there be "the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark them?
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day) working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their photosynthetic processes
God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all.
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

"He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before making the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of stars.
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists have it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of evolution.
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

Isaiah, with a little help from God, makes the sun move backwards ten degrees. Now that's quite a trick. All at once, the earth stopped spinning and then reversed its direction of rotation. Or maybe the sun traveled around the earth in those days!
-[Link: skepticsannotatedbible.com...]

222 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:21:52pm

re: #198 really grumpy big dog Johnson

I have Cubs/sux intercity baseball on ESPN. Cubs 5- sux 1. That is putting a smile on my face, but I know what you mean

223 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:22:20pm

re: #214 DistantThunder

Now that's just amazing. i always wonder why all the persuasion over the years doesn't break through, and then one day, all the peices fall into place.



The pieces fall into place

because

of all the persuasion over the years.

224 z9z99  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:23:32pm

If anyone is interested, some of my thoughts on intelligent design are here.

225 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:23:38pm
226 hermeneutics  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:23:41pm

re: #212 Cartman

My...what a novel idea.

No kidding. And we wonder why kids don't reason well? If the ID opponents here and elsewhere pointed fingers in the right direction, they may be pointed at themselves. Scientists, mathmeticians and educators have dumbed down the curriculum and erroneously taught kids HOW to think.

This isn't a problem with religion encroaching on science -- rather, the problem is that science has retreated into religious-like teachings. Teach facts and the "problem" will go away.

227 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:23:53pm
228 lawhawk  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:24:02pm

I can remember three teachers of mine that stand out vividly. One was my fifth grade teacher. She scared the bejeebus out of me. She demanded a lot - a whole lot more than I ever thought possible. Made me sick. But one thing that she forced and impressed upon everyone was the need to read - and document our reading. Read for an hour every night.

I often got in trouble for reading in class on materials unrelated to class. But it got through. And I did well.

Then, I had a HS teacher for history who was a riot. And taking his classes got me interested not in medicine as I thought, but history, politics and law.

Finally, a college poli-sci professor, whose teaching and lecturing was impressive. He made the Federalist Papers come alive. He might have been leftist in his political outlook, but never took it into the classroom or onto the exams. I had several of his classes, including in grad school. Definitely one to remember.

I can remember the bad teachers too, but they were thankfully few and far between.

229 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:24:26pm

I hate flakes.

I was checking my email last night when a mail came in from a buddy I hadnt seen for a while saying we should meet this weekend. I see is on yahoo messenger, shoot him an answer, no response. I answer his email, asking what he had in mind, no reply. Finally got a hold of him, he had forgotten all about it and wanted me to drop everything to come hang out.

You ever have a friend where you ask yourself, "Why the hell is he my friend?"

230 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:25:11pm

re: #192 buzzsawmonkey

I notice you cannot argue content. Was the American system first established under Biblical guidance or not? Do you like what the education system has evolved into or not? Could you pass a high school test given at the turn of the century. Probably, since you apparently know it all. Now...go find a book that gives me the math for one species evolving into another...I think that is a fair demand is you want to claim evolution is "science." Just show me the starting parameters of a particular species then give me the math that shows them becoming anything else. This should be easy for someone that knows it so well. Not even a hard one, not even going to ask how symbiotic relationships could come about, or parasites, let alone a virus. Come on all the scientific experts here, you are ready to damn anyone that believes God was the creator, show us your proven science. Or is it more of the mumbo-jumbo that passes for evolutionary thought?

231 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:25:12pm

Now that Discovery institute's last stalking horse of intelligent design textbooks went down in flames with the Dover decision they have a new stalking horse. This time around it's "Exploring Evolution" and they are setting up for the battle in Louisiana.

This from the DI site:
[Link: exploreevolution.com...]

232 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:25:21pm

re: #211 NoSpam

Uh- so far it's been shown three times that there were "at least" two students. Read the link and you'll see there were more allegations made. What those allegations are might have to wait for trial.

233 JeremyR  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:25:39pm

re: #147 jaunte

The lawsuit also mentions "at least two eigth-grade students."

[Link: www.mountvernonnews.com...]

Why did they have a BD-10A in the class room anyway? Its for leak and pin hole detection in manufacturing.

234 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:25:57pm
235 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:26:05pm
236 hermeneutics  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:27:06pm

re: #215 Ojoe

This is exactly the face of 'religion' that the 1st Amendment was intended to guard against.

And in fact, the very first sentence of the First Amendment.

Watch Out

Repectfully, Ojoe -- and you know I adore what you say here -- the non-establishment clause was intended to keep the national government from establishing religion. Subsequent jurisprudence was convoluted and merely confused original intent.

237 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:27:35pm

This is getting a little old, but let's try it again.

All those who believe in evolution, raise their hands.

238 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:27:49pm
239 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:28:18pm

re: #235 buzzsawmonkey

As an ex-Catholic I'm pretty sure it was Isaiah, but I could be wrong. I'm not infallible.

240 hermeneutics  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:28:27pm

gtg. Daughter here with staph infection on finger ... oh boy.

241 freetoken  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:28:46pm

re: #230 Kepler Sings

Come on all the scientific experts here, you are ready to damn anyone that believes God was the creator, show us your proven science.

You are suffering from some sort of persecution syndrome.

242 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:28:51pm

re: #230 Kepler Sings

Are you a Biblical literalist?

243 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:28:52pm

re: #233 JeremyR

I wondered about that, and the only speculation I have right now is that it was a dumb "hey look at this thing, it'll burn you without touching your skin" kind of 'science demonstration.'

244 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:28:58pm
245 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:29:07pm

re: #235 buzzsawmonkey

20:11 And Isaiah the prophet cried unto the LORD: and he brought the shadow ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down in the dial of Ahaz.

246 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:29:13pm

Well, I for one believe this man should be fired...

Though I am truly "raising n eyebrow" at those in the lizard army ready to spit vitriolic dogma of secularism in and about these discussions due to this man.

I'm not defending ID, but neither am I stating that this man is the perfect example of why ID is fake and therefore all ID believers need to be hung upside down and beaten with salmon until bla bla bla, rant rant rant...

I just love how the lizard army tries to eat its own every now and then...

Personally I still think Darwinism is a crock...and that he was trying to apply this F**ktard "theory" to elements of social engineering. If you doubt me feel free to read Darwin's "Descent of Man" and see if modern "science" was truly nothing more than science.

Or will I be a Lizard that needs to be taken down a few pegs, simply because I'm mostly staying out of this argument?

/ I guess then I'll be tossed into Dante's' first ring of hell...forever chasing a flag that I can never reach because I refused to take a side... Ah, who cares...there are still nut jobs out there baying for my blood. They just happen to be located in and around the ME.

247 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:29:41pm
248 BGOH  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:30:14pm
It occurs to me, however, that we have here one instance of what’s going on in many hundreds — even thousands — of science classrooms across the country. Teachers entrusted to teach science are instead teaching creationism and intelligent design.

I agree that this is a problem, but I think the more widespread and profound problem in science classrooms is the indoctrination into the Church of Global Warming that is taking place in the vast majority of classrooms around the country. Sure, in some backwater schools this ID thing is a problem (and trust me, there are a lot of them in Southern Ohio), but I think it is a fraction of the "Al Gore" problem.

OT: why are these a-holes on Sunday Night Baseball schilling for Obama? I realize they are in Chicago, but this is just ridiculous.

249 Slumbering Behemoth  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:30:38pm

re: #90 NoSpam

Why am I not entitled to my opinion?

Oh no, you are entitled to your opinions and/or beliefs. But you are not entitled to not have them challenged or questioned. This is not a class on self-esteem and validation, this is LGF. It's a tough room.

250 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:30:42pm

There must be a kind of victim magnet attached to these threads.

251 wolfie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:30:48pm

re: #203 hermeneutics

The math textbooks used in the public schools today are uniformly bad.
If students don't get a good teacher, they're screwed.

252 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:30:51pm

re: #230 Kepler Sings

To Buzzsaw:

"I notice you cannot argue content."

Man, you really picked the wrong person on this list to say that about. Suggest you do a search under his name.

253 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:31:20pm
254 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:31:22pm

You kind of give yourself away when you use the term "Darwinism". In science that term isn't used.

255 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:31:42pm

Ha, I got both sides covered.

I think God used Intelligent Design to create evolution and set the whole thing in place billions of years ago.

Aint I a stinker?

256 Ojoe  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:31:59pm

re: #236 hermeneutics

Ah yes, but Mr. Freshwater is, under color of government, that is in the public school system, seeking to further his particular brand of religion. That's still unconstitutional, even though he is only doing so on a personal level.

257 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:32:14pm

re: #230 Kepler Sings

Your Inner Fish

Buy it. Read it. Love it.

258 freetoken  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:32:14pm

re: #226 hermeneutics

No kidding. And we wonder why kids don't reason well? [...]

It's Wikipedia's fault they claim.

[...]and erroneously taught kids HOW to think..

You think that is somehow bad? If so, you are seriously mistaken.

259 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:32:24pm

re: #223 reine.de.tout

of all the persuasion over the years.

A million updings, yes. I hated my parents through out my formative years (because they did their JOB as parents); but they're the main reason why I became successful. (And if you're reading this Mr. Vacek, my senior year teacher, you have my eternal gratitude as well.)

260 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:32:45pm

re: #248 BGOH

I'm watching the game too, what are you talking about?

261 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:33:01pm
262 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:34:15pm

re: #255 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Ha, I like that...

263 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:34:40pm

Here is the boy's arm. It may very well heal..but he is traumatized for the rest of his life. How dare that idiot do this to a kid? How dare he?

I hope this POS loses his teaching license, and is never allowed to teach anywhere in this country again in a public school. In addition, he really needs to be sued.

264 Slumbering Behemoth  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:34:47pm

re: #97 Sharmuta

Because if you read the report- it sounds like there were witnesses. The other children described a cross. Why would a bunch of kids- some admitting they like this teacher- all lie about where the victim obtained this mark?

Not to mention Freshwater's own admission, though he tried to say it was an "X" and not a cross.

265 BGOH  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:34:51pm

re: #260 chicagodudewhotrades

I'm watching the game too, what are you talking about?

They just went on a five minute ramble (imagine that with Joe Morgan involved!) about who Obama's favorite White Sox are, how many times he has thrown out the opening pitch, which Backstreet Boy he likes the mostest, etc. Even Gammons got involved.

266 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:34:59pm

re: #255 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Ha, I got both sides covered.

I think God used Intelligent Design to create evolution and set the whole thing in place billions of years ago.

Aint I a stinker?

This was widely accepted thought when Darin's theory first came out, as Darwin was not the first to suggest the concept of evolution. There was Jean-Baptiste Lamark as well as the field known as orthogenesis.

267 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:35:14pm

re: #230 Kepler Sings

Now...go find a book that gives me the math for one species evolving into another.

The "math"?! What kind of "math" are you expecting?

Can you show us the "math" for your preferred theory of the origin and diversification of life on this planet?

268 Former Belgian  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:35:19pm

re: #230 Kepler Sings

I notice you cannot argue content. Was the American system first established under Biblical guidance or not? Do you like what the education system has evolved into or not? Could you pass a high school test given at the turn of the century. Probably, since you apparently know it all. Now...go find a book that gives me the math for one species evolving into another...I think that is a fair demand is you want to claim evolution is "science." Just show me the starting parameters of a particular species then give me the math that shows them becoming anything else. This should be easy for someone that knows it so well. Not even a hard one, not even going to ask how symbiotic relationships could come about, or parasites, let alone a virus. Come on all the scientific experts here, you are ready to damn anyone that believes God was the creator, show us your proven science. Or is it more of the mumbo-jumbo that passes for evolutionary thought?

Whoops, dinged that up when I meant to ding it down...

269 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:35:44pm

re: #264 Slumbering Behemoth

Very true, Sleepy B. He didn't deny he did it!

270 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:36:56pm

re: #266 Sharmuta

as well as the field known as orthogenesis.

I thought that was the theory explaining the rise of insect exterminators?

271 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:37:12pm

re: #240 hermeneutics

gtg. Daughter here with staph infection on finger ... oh boy.

Hope it's not MRSA

272 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:37:27pm

re: #238 buzzsawmonkey

Hey, what did tossed salad ever do to you? ;)

273 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:37:32pm

re: #232 Sharmuta

Uh- so far it's been shown three times that there were "at least" two students. Read the link and you'll see there were more allegations made. What those allegations are might have to wait for trial.

Until that link was posted to the video above, (and subsequent posts made in this thread) I'd only ever seen reports indicating one student. Now I've seen that there is more than one. It still doesn't change my opinion that I think there is a missing part to this story *dons tinfoil hat, tips it at a jaunty angle* I have played with/been shocked by those guns before. I was in a science class where a teacher did a very similar thing to several students. None of us were burned. Van der Graf generators cause more painful shocks than those guns...My suspicion comes from personal experience.

274 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:37:37pm

re: #265 BGOH


I tend to ignore the talking, just watching the game, plus i'm trying to make a buck trading, so I'm doing my typicalmulti-tasking

275 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:37:43pm

re: #228 lawhawk

Finally, a college poli-sci professor, whose teaching and lecturing was impressive. He made the Federalist Papers come alive. He might have been leftist in his political outlook, but never took it into the classroom or onto the exams. I had several of his classes, including in grad school. Definitely one to remember.

And isn't that what it's all about? Fuck tenure; give me a teacher who can breathe fire into a subject.

276 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:38:47pm
277 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:39:03pm
278 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:39:09pm

re: #127 godfrey

I meant to respond to you sooner, but it would be interesting to know what denomination freshwater belongs to.

279 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:39:17pm

re: #238 buzzsawmonkey

Oh, I can argue content; I just choose not to do so with people whose brains are clearly tossed salad.

So you don't know the science of evolution because you cannot answer me a simple question. I guess you take "by faith" what the guys in white coats say, sort of like the people took "by faith," what the men in robes said during the dark ages. Then and now there is no excuse for ignorance. I have read evolutionary theory, from many sources. I have read Behe and Dembski and others and made my own decisions. But I find zealots here that know NOTHING of evolution, not anything at all but what authorities have said. And yet they defend this theory they don't know with a zeal that would shame the Jesuits.

So you do not know the problems that are freely known by the experts in that field. You do not know that botanists rarely speak of the "tree of life," or have a time-life style taxonomy of apes into men pictographs. Rarely do any of you contemplate the inconsistencies of this theory, but you are ready to eagerly damn anyone believing God as the Creator. Yet you know neither subject. You fit the Biblical definition of fools.

280 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:39:53pm

re: #268 Former Belgian

Whoops, dinged that up when I meant to ding it down...

Welcome to the Club! I am president, IIRC, as I managed to ding down our Lizard Master at least 3 times, in error! Anyone else beat me?

281 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:40:11pm

re: #230 Kepler Sings

200-300 years ago, no one knew the math for explaining how birds could fly, how certain diseases where spread or how electricity worked exactly, it doesnt mean they occurred thru magic.

282 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:40:43pm

re: #279 Kepler Sings

but you are ready to eagerly damn anyone believing God as the Creator.

Can you give us the math for that, please. Thanks.

283 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:40:50pm

re: #240 hermeneutics

gtg. Daughter here with staph infection on finger ... oh boy.

If you can find them, have her wear finger cots (they look like a single finger cut from a latex glove) after you clean the infection--keeps it from spreading to other surfaces or other areas of the body by touching. Bandaids alone are permiable.

284 lawhawk  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:40:53pm

re: #275 David Simon

Absolutely. Then again, I'm sure that some of the students in that poli sci 101 class didn't get a single thing out of it. It's a shame too.

285 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:40:55pm

re: #253 buzzsawmonkey

Well, my qualm isn't with the faithful. I don't want to steal anyone's religion from them, I'm not a die-hard lefty atheist just your garden variety agnostic, in the vain of George Will perhaps (though I'm not worthy of being in the same sentence as the man).

I think ID is perfectly fine as a subject for high-school level philosophy classes, we just need to start 'em up now. I still don't understand exactly why proponents for ID are so against evolution when evolution in no way decries the idea of creationism.

A) God creates the universe.

B) Macro and Micro Evolution are part of the Universal laws that dictate said universe.

It's like gravity, nowhere in the Bible does it mention how or why gravity works, but thanks to brilliant men and women we now know why.

286 HelloDare  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:41:54pm

re: #268 Former Belgian

I dinged it down for you.

287 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:41:56pm

Funny note that may or may not be related to this argument. Years ago when I was an intern at a particular station, my manager saw me watching a rob zombie video at my desk. In the back of the video (a live concert...) there was a giant flaming X behind the band on the stage.

My boss saw this and was shocked.

She thought it was a burning cross...and then she thought that Rob zombie was showing elements of preaching Christianity in that video.

I can in all honesty say that she was a loon...it's no wonder that I outlasted her at that company.


/ Just food for thought, as to how some people see and X and they think Christian cross...hmmmmmm

288 yochanan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:43:02pm

i wanted my boys to learn TORAH I did not expect public school to teach them that. So i sent them to Jewish day school.. we don't even get secular Jewish history in public school. Jews don't even get a Jewish history week much less Jewish history month.

so i you want your children to be taught Christian theology in either a religion class or any were else send them to a Christian school.

289 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:43:03pm

re: #279 Kepler Sings

So you do not know the problems that are freely known by the experts in that field. You do not know that botanists rarely speak of the "tree of life," or have a time-life style taxonomy of apes into men pictographs. Rarely do any of you contemplate the inconsistencies of this theory, but you are ready to eagerly damn anyone believing God as the Creator. Yet you know neither subject. You fit the Biblical definition of fools.

Straw-man, assumptions. Two marks against you.

Most of the proponents of evolution on this website believe in God and are...*gasp*...CHRISTIANS!

290 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:43:18pm

re: #273 NoSpam

freshwater doesn't deny he did this.

291 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:43:33pm

re: #279 Kepler Sings

I'd like to see the math on that work. There are a lot of assertions there demanding mathematical proof.

292 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:43:54pm

re: #287 Capt_Faust

I blame the Scots.

293 Ojoe  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:44:33pm

I'm just a cracker.

But I'll think my own thoughts please,

and especially I want my kids to be able to think their own thoughts too.

................

Booga Booga Mr. Freshwater, what do you think most kids think about you now?

And you might very well have made it more difficult for them to really find G-d.

'Tis a bad thing you have been doing.

294 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:44:55pm

re: #277 buzzsawmonkey

Lettuce not go into that, please.

ROTFL! I promise not to bring it up again.

295 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:44:59pm

re: #287 Capt_Faust

Some people look for an excuse to be outraged. Personally I have a hard time seeing a cross in that picture, perhaps because it looks like it was taken a long time after the initial injury. I see a freckled kid with a line on his arm. *shrug*

Also, Rob Zombie? Preaching Christianity? Lol.

296 Attaboid  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:45:30pm

Can't we all just get along?
*long sticker*

/Pyg-me.

297 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:45:30pm

That's always and interesting point Kragar. What is the status of phenomena that we do not know exists, certain laws of nature, for example, that have not yet been identified. Is it truth? Am I using faith to believe in undiscovered truth?

298 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:46:25pm

Maybe, maybe I didn't yell this link loud enough.

[Link: www.amazon.com...]

What a great book. Here's my favorite author's endorsement of the book.

Orson Scott Card: "A much more easily-read book is Neil Shubin's Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body.

In fact, Shubin often talks down to his audience a bit. It's clear that he thinks he's writing to people who know almost nothing of anatomy or evolution; and that's a good thing!

But his jokes, alas, are the kind of lame humor that gets laughs from students because they're so desperately grateful for anything to break the monotony of the lecture.

Never mind all that. Because this book is an introductory course in the persistence of forms through the process of evolution, and it's written by a working scientist who has made important original contributions to science.

If you are adamantly opposed to the idea of evolution, then you really must avoid this book. It makes the fact of evolution so obvious and clear that the only way you can continue to disbelieve it is to assert that God is such a trickster he went to a lot of trouble to provide us with overwhelming evidence of evolution.

(The book does not, however, address the process of evolution, which to my mind is the real battleground between fanatical Darwinists and equally fanatical intelligent-design creationists. My personal opinion is they are all a bunch of clowns, claiming to know more on both sides of the issue than the evidence can possibly justify -- and then insisting that the schools be forced to teach their unprovable doctrines.)

Whether you see this book as an exploration of the workings of blind nature or as a celebration of the creations of a benevolent God is of no concern to me. What the book does is show you, in detail, how embryonic and fetal development, DNA, and mature body structures all reveal our intimate kinship with the first air-breathing fish to turn fins into the four limbs of all land-dwelling vertebrates.

That it's easy to read and contains cool stories about how you go about doing this kind of science is a bonus."

299 AZ Husky  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:46:35pm

re: #287 Capt_Faust

X has been an abbreviation for Christ in some cultures for centuries.

300 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:46:50pm

We do so love to be offended, don't we?

301 Attaboid  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:06pm

Throw it on the BBq. turn it over. Eat Yum Yum!

302 MJ  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:07pm

re: #279 Kepler Sings

So you don't know the science of evolution because you cannot answer me a simple question. I guess you take "by faith" what the guys in white coats say, sort of like the people took "by faith," what the men in robes said during the dark ages. Then and now there is no excuse for ignorance. I have read evolutionary theory, from many sources. I have read Behe and Dembski and others and made my own decisions. But I find zealots here that know NOTHING of evolution, not anything at all but what authorities have said. And yet they defend this theory they don't know with a zeal that would shame the Jesuits.

So you do not know the problems that are freely known by the experts in that field. You do not know that botanists rarely speak of the "tree of life," or have a time-life style taxonomy of apes into men pictographs. Rarely do any of you contemplate the inconsistencies of this theory, but you are ready to eagerly damn anyone believing God as the Creator. Yet you know neither subject. You fit the Biblical definition of fools.


You should have taken my advice and searched Buzzsawmonkey's postings here before you made an ass of yourself.

303 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:16pm

re: #283 NoSpam

If you can find them, have her wear finger cots (they look like a single finger cut from a latex glove) after you clean the infection--keeps it from spreading to other surfaces or other areas of the body by touching. Bandaids alone are permiable.

For infections I also have family members take oregano oil capsules. It's biblical name was hyssop and it was discovered to have anti-bacterial properties.

304 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:24pm

re: #290 Sharmuta

freshwater doesn't deny he did this.

Used the gun? yes. No one's arguing that he didn't use the gun. Did he also agree that he inflicted second degree burns? If so, I'd love to know how he did it with such a device...o_O

305 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:34pm

re: #300 theparson

We do so love to be offended, don't we?

HOW DARE YOU!

306 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:39pm
307 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:46pm

re: #292 jaunte

Yeah...why not. I mean who else in this world can take an animated F-bomb and make it a 9 letter word instead of the 4 letters it originated with.

/ Your Fooookkin Daft man! LOL...good idea let's blame them :D

308 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:46pm
"...But it's not just about the Bible on the desk. Freshwater, 51, has been at odds with the school administration on other occasions because he put God into his explanation of how the world began.
In one class, Freshwater used Lego pieces to describe the beginning of the world. He dumped the pieces, then asked students if the Legos could assemble by themselves, said Joe Stuart, 18, assistant editor of the high-school newspaper.
When Freshwater taught students about electrical current, he used a device to leave a red mark in the shape of a cross on the forearms of some students, Stuart said.
"If it were just about the Bible, I don't think people would have a problem with it," Stuart said.
[Link: www.dispatch.com...]
309 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:47:51pm

re: #277 buzzsawmonkey

Lettuce not go into that, please.

Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's. And render unto Waldorf, and Bibb, that which is theirs.

310 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:48:21pm

re: #298 DeathtotheSwiss

Hilarious title.

311 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:48:30pm
312 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:49:09pm

re: #307 Capt_Faust

This is what I mean:
[Link: www.britannica.com...]

313 Attaboid  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:49:14pm

re: #298 DeathtotheSwiss

Death to the Wiss. It's a cook book. Where is the money? Do the Swiss have these huge mountain vaults?

314 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:49:21pm

re: #216 Cartman

Cajun Rock Fish on the grill, stir fired sweet taters, rice salad. I'll let you know how it goes.

315 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:49:25pm

re: #305 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

HOW DARE YOU!

Well I never...

316 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:49:43pm
317 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:50:08pm

re: #310 DistantThunder

Hilarious title.

I agree. I got it for Christmas (which I shall celebrate til the day I die)

318 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:50:09pm

re: #308 jaunte

Legos- is there anything they can't do? ;)

319 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:50:10pm

re: #306 buzzsawmonkey

But scientists are working to study the brain under what the patient describes as a "spiritual" experience, using various "spect scans"

320 jcm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:50:14pm

This Hubbell Space Telescope image as been suppressed!

It supports my contention on the structure of the universe!

321 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:50:50pm
322 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:50:51pm

Behe? Are people still mentioning Behe here?
/Idiots!

323 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:51:04pm
324 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:51:16pm

re: #311 ploome hineni

Wow, this is getting ridiculous, but it is the Islamists self-admitted front of the war.

325 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:51:19pm

re: #305 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

HOW DARE YOU!

BACK OFF, YOU BASTARD!

/

326 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:51:22pm
327 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:51:22pm

re: #318 Sharmuta

Now he's going to be in trouble for supporting Danish industry!

328 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:51:45pm

re: #313 Attaboid

Death to the Wiss. It's a cook book. Where is the money? Do the Swiss have these huge mountain vaults?

That's where they keep their chocolate. And it's....*evil cackle* to...die...for...

329 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:51:50pm

re: #304 NoSpam

Used the gun? yes. No one's arguing that he didn't use the gun. Did he also agree that he inflicted second degree burns? If so, I'd love to know how he did it with such a device...o_O

are you insane? the guy admits that he did this to the kids, except he says he made an X instead of the cross and you're asking whether he agreed that he inflicted second degree burns?
Freshwater violated these kids physically, for that he not only needs to be thrown out of the school system, but he needs to do time as well for assault.

330 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:52:10pm
331 Attaboid  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:52:12pm
332 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:52:32pm

re: #320 jcm

This Hubbell Space Telescope image as been suppressed!

It supports my contention on the structure of the universe!

Thou art God.

333 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:53:12pm

This is your Brain on God

Belief in God has long been held to be a superstition by the scientific community as the existence of such a higher power cannot be demonstrated through objective observation. While science is unable to prove whether or not God is real, the field of neurotheology has instead posed a new question that we can find answers to: is there activity in the brain specific to religious experience? Can science in fact shed light on Thoreau's question?

Through the use of brain imaging technology, Dr. Andrew Newberg has conducted research in an attempt to find answers to these questions. The participants in his study were Buddhists well-versed in meditation. Newberg used a SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) camera to make an image of the brain of an individual at the moment he reaches the climax of meditation. Such a picture would enable us to look at the brain as it "experiences God."

The "peak" of meditation is clearly a subjective state, with each individual attaining it in different manners and having different time requirements. However, the sensation and meaning behind this moment is consistent among all who reach it. At the peak, the subjects indicate that they lose their sense of individual existence and feel inextricably bound with the universe. "There [are] no discrete objects or beings, no sense of space or the passage of time, no line between the self and the rest of the universe"

334 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:53:35pm

re: #268 Former Belgian

OT: I left this for you on another thread, and there is also a post to you from Yochanan right after mine...

335 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:53:36pm

re: #327 jaunte

That's okay- his buddy Daubenmire is already trying to latch onto the counter-jihad. Maybe they can work on getting a joint fatwa.

336 OldLineTexan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:54:00pm

re: #332 DeathtotheSwiss

Thou art God.

I grok, but some of these Gods worry me a bit.

I vote for stew for dinner. Anyone feeling...unwell?

337 Ojoe  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:54:12pm

re: #285 DeathtotheSwiss

Nah, we know how gravity works.

Why is still a mystery if you ask me.

Did you know that gravity is by far the weakest known force?

But that in the end it might influence the 'fate of the universe'
more than the other forces?

And now, physicists are on the track of something called a
"Weakly Interacting Massive Particle" (WIMP, I kid you not) which MAY account for some of the "dark matter" that they think ought to be here, but nobody can yet see.

Creation is awesome; not to peer intently at it through science is kind of an insult to the Creator, IMHO

Weakly Interacting Masive Particles

338 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:54:43pm

re: #308 jaunte

Freshwater used Lego pieces to describe the beginning of the world. He dumped the pieces, then asked students if the Legos could assemble by themselves, said Joe Stuart, 18, assistant editor of the high-school newspaper.

I bet the students in that class came away with a healthy appreciation for the scientific method.... not

339 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:54:54pm

re: #295 NoSpam

Tell me about it. Rob Zombie? I had to sit there and shake my head in wonder when she left the room...

As to burns, I've gotten a lifetime of burns from many interesting stories in my life. Trust me when I say that "I've had worse" and that these seem seem eyebrow raising at best. And to those Lizards who bristle at my comments, let me remind you how much fun a real burn on your forearm really is...

You know, the kind that come from engines...that are trapped on your arm...and burn through your protective coverings into your flesh...

Trust me when I say with all sincerity that those kinds of burns look a lot different that these. Meh...what do I know?

/ Its the stab wounds that leave nasty scars...sure I laugh about them now, but someone remind me why I frequented DC so often when I was young and naive? LOL

340 formercorpsman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:54:58pm

re: #299 AZ Husky

Greek Orthodox.

341 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:55:04pm

re: #329 2by2

The lengths some people are going to in their attempts to not denounce this guy are stunning.

342 Attaboid  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:55:05pm

re: #333 DistantThunder

Through the use of brain imaging technology


You lost me there.

343 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:55:24pm

re: #337 Ojoe

Nah, we know how gravity works.

Why is still a mystery if you ask me.

Did you know that gravity is by far the weakest known force?

But that in the end it might influence the 'fate of the universe'
more than the other forces?

And now, physicists are on the track of something called a
"Weakly Interacting Massive Particle" (WIMP, I kid you not) which MAY account for some of the "dark matter" that they think ought to be here, but nobody can yet see.

Creation is awesome; not to peer intently at it through science is kind of an insult to the Creator, IMHO

Weakly Interacting Masive Particles

Stop, stare, appreciate.

344 OldLineTexan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:55:28pm

re: #335 Sharmuta

a joint fatwa.

What kind of party is this? Who's burning rope?

345 DeathtotheSwiss  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:55:52pm

re: #336 OldLineTexan

I am but an egg. From now on when ID and EVO are mentioned I'll just offer to share water and then discorporate. I'm off to bed now, anyhow. Goodnight my water-brothers, waiting is fullness.

346 jcm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:55:52pm

re: #332 DeathtotheSwiss

Thou art God.

I AM.......
Turtle!

347 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:56:28pm

re: #321 ploome hineni

Maybe, I have... maybe I have.

348 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:56:33pm

Zygote here.

349 BGOH  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:57:22pm

re: #315 theparson

Well I never...

Have you ever heard of such a thing?

350 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:57:47pm
"With all your science can you tell
how it is, and whence it is
that light comes into the soul?"
~ Henry David Thoreau
351 OldLineTexan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:58:04pm

re: #345 DeathtotheSwiss

I am but an egg. From now on when ID and EVO are mentioned I'll just offer to share water and then discorporate. I'm off to bed now, anyhow. Goodnight my water-brothers, waiting is fullness.

I will be at the bottom of the pool, looking for Dorcas. Earlier, I cut the happy grasses and grokked their fullness.

I have learned to control my urges to disincorporate.

352 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:58:05pm

re: #267 Occasional Reader

I easily accepted physics as "science" I used to do it in the lab, repeatable, the math was there to do it over and over, the same with Chemistry, observable, repeatable. My own field of electronics, although all was not, and still is not understood of the lowly electron, still I could design circuits using Ohms Law, or Maxwell's equations. That to me is science. Now take a theory that arrogantly tries to explain life, or the origin of life but gives me less mathematical theory than how to design a simple electronic circuit. It first makes claims that all species evolved over vast periods of time into all species we see now, and all that ever lived.

Yet its claims are never substantiated. It predicts millions of transitory species ought to be found. Instead the fossil record shows not slow gradual progression of species, but animal life of all kinds suddenly appearing in the rocks. And no transitory species found. The excuse eventually is that "well it looks like conditions did not exists to fossilize those transitory species, just the end-point and known species. What? Do they think everyone is a fool?

So I demand some math, some science, like I saw for all the other sciences. And there is none, absolutely no systematic mathematical treatment of how one species evolves into another. Just a hodge-podge of statistical methods and population math that is used to obscure a simple request for elegant understandable processes. So until that is provided I have the right, even the duty to deny evolution the status of a science.

And I can damn well believe that God is the creator of life until proven otherwise. I never claimed my faith was science, but I only ask that evolution be shown as a science when to me it smells like a faith, acts like a faith, and is defended as a faith. Would anyone get worked up if someone denied Ohm's Law? You would not even address such a person they would be thought of as an idiot or imbecile. Yet the evolutionists react exactly like the zealots we have known since Nimrod made men worship rabbits and Evergreen trees. They act like they are defending a faith, and a very bad one at that.

353 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:58:19pm

re: #335 Sharmuta

It's a funny update of the watchmaker analogy.

354 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 7:58:27pm

re: #312 jaunte

Ah HA...

Good one, why did I not think of that earlier...

You get the bonus points of the day my friend.

/ Must stop posting at work...It means both my posts, and my job turn out half assed.

355 jcm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:00:16pm

One day a group of scientists got together and decided that man had come a long way and no longer needed God. So they picked one scientist to go and tell Him that they were done with Him.

The scientist walked up to God and said, "God, we've decided that we no longer need you. We're to the point that we can clone people and do many miraculous things, so why don't you just go on and get lost."

God listened very patiently and kindly to the man and after the scientist was done talking, God said, "Very well, how about this, let's say we have a man making contest." To which the scientist replied, "OK, great!"

But God added, "Now, we're going to do this just like I did back in the old days with Adam."

The scientist said, "Sure, no problem" and bent down and grabbed himself a handful of dirt.

God just looked at him and said, "No, no, no. You go get your own dirt!"

God making snakes.

356 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:00:17pm

re: #354 Capt_Faust

(If you look closely enough, the Scots are behind everything)
[Link: www.amazon.com...]

357 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:00:56pm
358 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:01:43pm

freshwater should just use the obama defense:

That is not the X I knew....

359 formercorpsman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:02:18pm

re: #341 Sharmuta

There is no defense of this.

Nor should there be.

He has not only been counseled on it, he has violated the terms of his employment contract for years upon years.

This guy is wrong, despite anything else someone might make a comparison to.

Furthermore, anyone who aligns themselves as a Christian, should find this reprehensible, as it not only give the faith a bad name, but allows this fool to speak for them.

360 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:02:24pm

re: #352 Kepler Sings

Can you give me the math proving that the human body metabolizes glucose in order to sustain life? I'm pretty sure it's true (picking dinner out of teeth), but the "math" escapes me. Thanks.

Your straw man arguments are eloquently presented, but are still straw man arguments.

361 Noam Sayin'  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:02:38pm

Some hinky things going on with LGF right now, Charles. Load times are long, got logged out, refresh comments and show ratings take a long time, too.

362 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:03:49pm

re: #329 2by2

are you insane? the guy admits that he did this to the kids, except he says he made an X instead of the cross and you're asking whether he agreed that he inflicted second degree burns?
Freshwater violated these kids physically, for that he not only needs to be thrown out of the school system, but he needs to do time as well for assault.


If he agreed that he did it, then I wouldn't be suspect of the event any longer, because it would prove assault. Also nowhere have I stated that I don't think this guy should be fired despite my issues with this particular facet of the case.

Slogging through the message boards at snopes (who are having a similar discussion) I found the complete transcript of the complaint

[Link: www.newarkadvocate.com...]

The teacher's account of the device is similar to my own experience with these kinds of devices, and it also states that the kids volunteered to test the device out (Now, should he have been using it at all? Probably not, but that's another story entirely.) Seeing as how I've been 'burned' with such a gun before in a similar experiment and never received these kinds of injuries I wonder what's going on here, and I strongly suspect the kid did something to his own arm, either on purpose or by accident, to cause injury.

363 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:03:50pm

re: #352 Kepler Sings

Instead the fossil record shows not slow gradual progression of species, but animal life of all kinds suddenly appearing in the rocks.

Really? ALL AT THE SAME TIME? No kidding?

You're full of shit, Kepler Sings.

364 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:03:54pm
365 Alouette  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:04:02pm

re: #234 ploome hineni

that mexican leaf that looks like parsley

You mean cilantro?

Many years ago, I sent my husband to the store to buy parsley. I already put up my chicken soup so when he came home from the store I grabbed the bunch of parsley and threw it in the soup.

At the dinner table, I served the soup, and the kids started to complain that it tasted "like band-aids." I tasted the soup and sure enough, it had a medicinal, soapy taste like the smell of a box of band-aids.

It was much later we figured out that the bunch of stuff I thought was parsley was really cilantro.

366 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:04:19pm

re: #352 Kepler Sings

It is my opinion that you have articulated your point and position quite well but I think it would be more effective without the invective. Just my opinion.

367 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:04:43pm

re: #352 Kepler Sings

Darwin's Theory of Evolution doesn't attempt to explain life or the origins thereof. "Origin of Species" not "Origin of life". Get it right and quit propagating the strawman please.

368 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:05:05pm

re: #361 Noam Sayin'

I don't seem to be having any of those problems.

369 Noam Sayin'  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:05:23pm

Got logged out again, but everything seems to be working okay now.

370 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:05:25pm

re: #359 formercorpsman

Sorry- none of my posts have been in defense of this man, but I suppose it's what I get for trying to crack a joke.

371 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:06:21pm
372 Pawn of the Oppressor  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:06:22pm

re: #132 chicagodudewhotrades

When autopsy's were performed it was learned the crew had drowned. The explosion knocked them all unconscious but they were all alive when the crew compartment fell from the sky and hit the ocean.

They didn't drown, they were killed by the 200mph impact with the surface of the ocean.

373 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:07:16pm

re: #289 DeathtotheSwiss

Teachers entrusted to teach science are instead teaching creationism and intelligent design.re: #281 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

It is Evolution making the claim as science, where is the math? They have had 150 years, where is the math? Can't make the claim then compete as a faith, just like ID. Which should be taught in schools, but as a hypothesis concerning unanswered questions pertaining to the origin of life. The same treatment evolution should get. It is not a science, not all the arrogant and snide put-downs here of my viewpoint, or of me, changes that simple fact. Show evolution as a science then you can teach it in science class. I am glad of the ID debate, because eventually it will help to expose the fraud of evolution being taught as science.

374 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:07:18pm

re: #356 jaunte

Methinks that the Scots are going to drop the hammer on me anytime soon.

LOL.

/ Why can't I pick on people who I know won't try to kick my ass...like the Amish. And even then the Amish CAN kick my ass...at making butter.

375 formercorpsman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:07:40pm

re: #370 Sharmuta

Sharmuta, I know that.

Having not gone through the thread post by post, I saw yours, and was just adding to it.

I was amazed that someone here, despite any religious affiliation, could rationally defend this guy or his actions.

I know your a straight shooter.

376 Noam Sayin'  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:07:40pm

re: #368 theparson

I don't seem to be having any of those problems.

Musta been a hitch in my browser's giddy-up. Not entirely happy with FF3.

377 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:08:07pm

re: #369 Noam Sayin'

Got logged out again, but everything seems to be working okay now.

drinkin' again,Noam?

378 Alouette  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:08:12pm

I didn't mean to double post that.

Never put cilantro in chicken soup is what I meant to post.

379 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:08:13pm

re: #373 Kepler Sings

Teachers entrusted to teach science are instead teaching creationism and intelligent design.re: #281 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

It is Evolution making the claim as science, where is the math? They have had 150 years, where is the math? Can't make the claim then compete as a faith, just like ID. Which should be taught in schools, but as a hypothesis concerning unanswered questions pertaining to the origin of life. The same treatment evolution should get. It is not a science, not all the arrogant and snide put-downs here of my viewpoint, or of me, changes that simple fact. Show evolution as a science then you can teach it in science class. I am glad of the ID debate, because eventually it will help to expose the fraud of evolution being taught as science.


Have you read a biochemistry text lately? Plenty of math there for you.

380 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:08:44pm

re: #352 Kepler Sings

And no transitory species found

Um, really?

Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus afarensis
Kenyanthropus platyops
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus garhi
Australopithecus aethiopicus
Australopithecus robustus
Australopithecus boisei
Homo habilis
Homo georgicus
Homo erectus
Homo ergaster
Homo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo floresiensis

And that's just for US, and non-inclusive.

381 Noam Sayin'  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:08:46pm

re: #377 joecitizen

Again?

382 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:09:49pm

re: #360 Occasional Reader

Metabolic pathways are fairly well known, and the math is straightforward, although boring, more to be discovered I am sure. Now where is the math that all science should have at its foundation to lay claim as "science." Evolution is singular in all the science world in NOT having any.

383 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:10:22pm

WOOO - HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !

384 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:10:49pm

re: #380 Occasional Reader

Platypus!

385 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:10:58pm

This has been fun, but it's a school night (so to speak). Good night.

386 loflyer  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:11:01pm

re: #320 jcm

This Hubbell Space Telescope image as been suppressed!

It supports my contention on the structure of the universe!

Multiple realities? Or a liberals dream?

387 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:11:02pm

re: #381 Noam Sayin'

Again?


still?

388 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:11:10pm

14 straight wins at home ---- unheard of for decades ! For any team!

THIS IS THE YEAR ! !

389 NJDhockeyfan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:11:17pm

Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win!

They just swept the White Sox!

:)

390 kansas  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:11:37pm

Teach for 21 years and you burn one cross on some kid....

391 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:11:43pm

re: #389 NJDhockeyfan

Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win! Cubs win!

They just swept the White Sox!

:)

LEt'S DANCE ! ! !

392 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:11:48pm
Homo habilis
Homo georgicus
Homo erectus
Homo ergaster
Homo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo floresiensis

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

393 Pawn of the Oppressor  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:18pm

re: #360 Occasional Reader

Can you give me the math proving that the human body metabolizes glucose in order to sustain life? I'm pretty sure it's true (picking dinner out of teeth), but the "math" escapes me. Thanks.

Your straw man arguments are eloquently presented, but are still straw man arguments.

You get out of here with your faith-based "facts" and your heathenous "common sense". What are you trying to do, get us all killed?

394 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:20pm

re: #388 mama winger

14 straight wins at home ---- unheard of for decades ! For any team!

THIS IS THE YEAR ! !


since 1936 for the cubbies...

395 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:22pm

re: #376 Noam Sayin'

And I don't, with *gasp* IE7! Well, not usually. ;)

396 NJDhockeyfan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:33pm

re: #391 mama winger

LEt'S DANCE ! ! !

Of course!

To the Go Cubs Go song please.

397 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:45pm

Cubs win and the Cubs sweep the south-siders

398 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:46pm

re: #386 loflyer

Turtle Up! It's an ID thread!

399 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:53pm

re: #341 Sharmuta

The lengths some people are going to in their attempts to not denounce this guy are stunning.


Just go ahead and say NoSpam, because I'm pretty much the only one saying anything, rather than the somewhat snide "some people."

I do not like the fact that, despite my numerous assertions to the contrary, that you appear to think I want this guy let off the hook scot-free. Not so. This teacher is an idiot. He should not be a teacher. But I do not, given the information I have seen so far, believe he is guilty of assault. I do not believe I can make my position on the matter any clearer than that.

400 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:12:53pm

This is a great day to be alive.

401 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:13:06pm

re: #388 mama winger

14 straight wins at home ---- unheard of for decades ! For any team!

THIS IS THE YEAR ! !

Don't jinx it. I was a Cubs fan when little. Joe "pepe" Pepitone was my guy.

402 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:13:17pm

re: #373 Kepler Sings

Glad to see you would be just as willing to back up the Flying Spaghetti monster. I'd rather my kids learn about the scientific method using evolution as a example rather than have some jackass decide "because this book says so" is the answer.

403 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:13:22pm

Kepler

Math
Math
Math

That was on a ten second search, I can find lots more.

404 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:13:35pm

re: #396 NJDhockeyfan

Of course!

To the Go Cubs Go song please.

405 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:14:11pm

.......and i realize once again i'm slower than mama winger in telling you all this

406 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:14:14pm

re: #361 Noam Sayin'

Some hinky things going on with LGF right now, Charles. Load times are long, got logged out, refresh comments and show ratings take a long time, too.

I've been getting this too when the threads start to top 600 posts or so. That evolution megathread from a few days ago almost crashed my computer a couple times.

407 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:14:28pm

re: #400 mama winger

This is a great day to be alive.


every day lookin' down at the grass instead of up at the grass...

408 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:14:32pm

re: #405 chicagodudewhotrades

.......and i realize once again i'm slower than mama winger in telling you all this

hahaha :)

409 Egfrow  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:14:46pm

The entire enemy we have in common is the succumbing to the false virtues of Altruism. We have to sacrifice all for a greater good, the first prerequisite is to sacrifice you mind. Free Thinking and a clear understanding of reality is not required. Whether it's Islam, Socialism, Communism, or any other social structure where the personal independence of the individual comes second. These are all qualities that usually have a pessimistic or negative view against humanity as a force of true good. They argue that reality is subjective and can not be known and morality is dependent on context and point of view.

This is been the way of human history for millenniums with only small spurts of freedom like revolutions that were stomped out, but definitely not the norm. The last 100 years has created an upheaval and the world is scared. There has never been anything like the USA in history and the world is still at a loss to describe what's happening. Needless to say things have just gotten started in a historical sense even though things look to be in great chaos now from our own private views, if taken in as a whole, that's nearly impossible, things are just moving much faster and in greater volume. Keep ahold of the reigns and there will be an end to this. If you let go someone is will get the reigns and will kill the horse.

410 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:14:47pm

re: #407 joecitizen

every day lookin' down at the grass instead of up at the grass...

Yup. That be true.

411 Ol' flyboy  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:15:00pm

re: #388 mama winger

I'll believe it when I see it!

/Cubbie fan since 1951

412 NJDhockeyfan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:15:35pm

re: #397 chicagodudewhotrades

Cubs win and the Cubs sweep the south-siders

A buddy of mine went to Cubs spring training (the one for the fans) last February. He trades stock for a living. The first night he was there he got drunk with Rick Sutcliffe who then nicknamed him 'Hedgefund Skippy'.

413 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:16:02pm

re: #411 Ol' flyboy

I'll believe it when I see it!

/Cubbie fan since 1951

Ahhhh yes, you've got bragging rights ( or misery rights) then. Me - only since '58.

414 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:16:03pm

re: #411 Ol' flyboy

I'll believe it when I see it!

/Cubbie fan since 1951

How many times has your heart been broken?

415 NJDhockeyfan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:16:08pm

re: #404 mama winger

[Link: www.youtube.com...]

Sweeet!

416 littleO  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:16:14pm

#333 Distant Thunder

Oh, for chris' sake. In the first place, do you suppose, say, Catholics and Buddhist look at God and the Heavens in the same way? Secondly, this whole question about ID is a crock. ID was proposed by scientist as an out, because they were confined by the science of DNA.
This teacher is some kind of loon! If down the road the federal government allows ID to be questioned in schools they will write strict rules into text books that allows little wiggle room.
Besides, don't most of you here believe that most teachers who want to introduce religious aspects into the curricullum will do so in a reasonable and loving fashion?

417 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:16:48pm

re: #400 mama winger

As is every day that is given....eh?

/ ;D

418 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:17:04pm

re: #412 NJDhockeyfan

A buddy of mine went to Cubs spring training (the one for the fans) last February. He trades stock for a living. The first night he was there he got drunk with Rick Sutcliffe who then nicknamed him 'Hedgefund Skippy'.

What a great story! My brother used to go to those Winter Cubs conventions before he passed away. He was mentally retarded, and the team was always so nice to him.

419 jcm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:17:19pm

re: #386 loflyer

Multiple realities? Or a liberals dream?

Ahhh, count the turtles, and you too can gain enlightenment!

420 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:17:44pm

re: #417 Capt_Faust

As is every day that is given....eh?

/ ;D

Yes, Cap'n. Every one a gift.

421 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:18:03pm

Oops basic calculus a must for evolution class.

[Link: www.arizona.edu...]

422 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:18:24pm

re: #416 littleO

#333 Distant Thunder

Oh, for chris' sake. In the first place, do you suppose, say, Catholics and Buddhist look at God and the Heavens in the same way? Secondly, this whole question about ID is a crock. ID was proposed by scientist as an out, because they were confined by the science of DNA.
This teacher is some kind of loon! If down the road the federal government allows ID to be questioned in schools they will write strict rules into text books that allows little wiggle room.
Besides, don't most of you here believe that most teachers who want to introduce religious aspects into the curricullum will do so in a reasonable and loving fashion?

I was responding to a post that said science and faith never intersect. This is a case where there is a legitimate scientific interest in faith. They've done the same research with people having orgasms.

ID should NOT be taught in the schools.

423 Ol' flyboy  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:18:28pm

I'm used to it. Cub fans enjoy hitting themselves over the head with a baseball...because it feels good when they stop.

424 Cartman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:18:32pm

re: #376 Noam Sayin'

Musta been a hitch in my browser's giddy-up. Not entirely happy with FF3.

It seems to be rather "unstable" from time to time for me, as well.

425 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:18:53pm

re: #423 Ol' flyboy

I'm used to it. Cub fans enjoy hitting themselves over the head with a baseball...because it feels good when they stop.

Isn't this the best you've ever seen them play though?

426 jcm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:19:01pm

re: #379 Thanos

Have you read a biochemistry text lately? Plenty of math there for you.

Like calculated the bonding energies between two proteins.

427 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:19:20pm

re: #418 mama winger

What a great story! My brother used to go to those Winter Cubs conventions before he passed away. He was mentally retarded, and the team was always so nice to him.

Wonderful.

428 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:19:33pm

re: #414 DistantThunder

How many times has your heart been broken?

since about 1951...

429 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:19:37pm

re: #420 mama winger

I hear that...

430 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:19:58pm

re: #427 DistantThunder

Wonderful.

We buried him in his Cubs jersey, his Cubs cap and his Special Olympics medals.

431 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:20:05pm

re: #380 Occasional Reader

From what species to what species can they be PROVEN to be an intermediate species? Most of this is just a labeling scheme by paleo-biologists that have a vested interest to say the least. It is like someone thousands of years from now digging up a Mustang and a Chevy Malibu, maybe one came from the other, and claiming they are related...well yeah...I guess they are both CARS!

Once again without really knowing anything about this theory other than a Google search here and there, your argument is no different than the Creationists, it is an argument from authority. They use the Bible, you use men in white smocks. But you neither know or understand what they are talking about. But what is funny is most of you are as smart as the guys in the white smocks and could think this out yourself.

If the force of evolution drove horses to grow longer and longer legs to get away from the tigers that were chasing them (as I was taught basic evolutionary non-sense in elementary school) why did not the tigers, supposedly, under the same compulsion, also grow longer and longer legs? Why do we not still have big-ass tigers chasing the horses. Seems to me evolution can whimsically work here, then not there, at the behest of the evolutionist whenever he needs to explain a difficulty.

432 Ol' flyboy  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:20:30pm

re: #425 mama winger

I stand by my first comment.

433 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:20:34pm

re: #430 mama winger

We buried him in his Cubs jersey, his Cubs cap and his Special Olympics medals.

He'll be looking down from heaven and cheering when they finally win then.

434 OldLineTexan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:20:43pm

re: #383 mama winger

WOOO - HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !

I'll have what she's having, please.

435 Noam Sayin'  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:20:48pm

re: #424 Cartman

It seems to be rather "unstable" from time to time for me, as well.

You'd think a real improvement would be a leaner, meaner browser rather than a bunch of crappy new features I didn't ask for.

436 mama winger  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:21:07pm

I gotta take the dog out and get to bed. Just wanted to celebrate with some of my buds.

:)

goodnight friends

437 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:21:09pm

re: #360 Occasional Reader

picking dinner out of teeth

With a toenail clipping, right?

438 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:22:15pm

I just like the phase "...big-ass tigers..."

Perhaps we can nominate that for a rotating title?

/ I understand the argument, but the big-ass tiger comment made me :)

439 infidel Alan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:23:09pm

Cilantro is also used heavily in Thai cooking, at least in restaurants around Los Angeles, (I don't know why).

440 Capt_Faust  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:23:39pm

Got to run all...

Good night. Be safe and Go Easy!

/ The capt

441 chicagodudewhotrades  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:23:51pm

re: #412 NJDhockeyfan

cool

442 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:23:52pm
443 NJDhockeyfan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:23:52pm

re: #418 mama winger

What a great story! My brother used to go to those Winter Cubs conventions before he passed away. He was mentally retarded, and the team was always so nice to him.

He sent me a signed baseball and is taking me to the next one. Hopefully I will be hanging out with the World Champion Cubs.

444 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:24:06pm

re: #431 Kepler Sings

From what species to what species can they be PROVEN to be an intermediate species? Most of this is just a labeling scheme by paleo-biologists that have a vested interest to say the least. It is like someone thousands of years from now digging up a Mustang and a Chevy Malibu, maybe one came from the other, and claiming they are related...well yeah...I guess they are both CARS!

Once again without really knowing anything about this theory other than a Google search here and there, your argument is no different than the Creationists, it is an argument from authority. They use the Bible, you use men in white smocks. But you neither know or understand what they are talking about. But what is funny is most of you are as smart as the guys in the white smocks and could think this out yourself.

If the force of evolution drove horses to grow longer and longer legs to get away from the tigers that were chasing them (as I was taught basic evolutionary non-sense in elementary school) why did not the tigers, supposedly, under the same compulsion, also grow longer and longer legs? Why do we not still have big-ass tigers chasing the horses. Seems to me evolution can whimsically work here, then not there, at the behest of the evolutionist whenever he needs to explain a difficulty.

It surprises me when i watch shows on AFrica that that animals are so oddly different. Super tall giraffe. Furry lions. Rhinos, I guess those are similar to hippos in size and shape, but then there are elephants. I would expect more similarities, less diversity.

445 jcm  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:24:07pm

Evolution in action....

or at least survival of the fittest.

446 NoSpam  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:24:18pm

re: #437 David Simon

Thank you for putting this image into my brain as I go to get some food.

This thread needs more happy (actually this is somewhat sad, but entertaining nonetheless):

Goodday, and goodnight.

447 DistantThunder  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:24:25pm

re: #436 mama winger

I gotta take the dog out and get to bed. Just wanted to celebrate with some of my buds.

:)

goodnight friends

Happy dreams

448 OldLineTexan  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:25:32pm

re: #439 infidel Alan

Cilantro is also used heavily in Thai cooking, at least in restaurants around Los Angeles, (I don't know why).

Because it's not just a Mexican herb. Vietnamese cooking uses it, too.

449 Ojoe  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:25:47pm
450 sojerofgod  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:26:15pm

re: #392 theparson

This man should not be around children.

Christians don't need people like this that abuse faith in the name of faith, and I daresay, though I'm sure some will call me blasphemer, that God doesn't need his help either.

451 freetoken  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:26:23pm

re: #373 Kepler Sings


It is Evolution making the claim as science, where is the math?

That is a perverse way of looking at science.

For biology, at the molecular level all the molecules follow the physics as explained in the Standard Model of quantum physics. For larger ensembles simply use statistical mechanics. Even larger groups of living things can be described with tools out of systems theory (complexity, networks, etc.)

You're not only barking up the wrong tree, ... it isn't even a tree...

452 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:26:42pm

Thai food huh? In Los Angeles huh? You sure that green leafy substance is cilantro?

453 Carridine  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:27:47pm

re: #416 littleO

Besides, don't most of you here believe that most teachers who want to introduce religious aspects into the curricullum will do so in a reasonable and loving fashion?


What one person considers a 'reasonable and loving fashion' appears to others as 'insidious and unreasonable', so Americans agree that having the State teach ANYTHING about religion is inappropriate.

THAT's the argument here, 'Teaching ID as Science'... ID is NOT scientific, and ought only to be contemplated (if at all) under the rubric of religion or religionism...

454 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:27:52pm

re: #450 sojerofgod

This man should not be around children.

Christians don't need people like this that abuse faith in the name of faith, and I daresay, though I'm sure some will call me blasphemer, that God doesn't need his help either.

I'm sorry but you lost me.
I was making a Seinfeld joke.

455 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:28:01pm
456 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:28:10pm

Kepler if you want to talk about something controversial in evolution try sypmatric vs. allopatric.

457 goddessoftheclassroom  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:31:09pm

re: #259 David Simon

A million updings, yes. I hated my parents through out my formative years (because they did their JOB as parents); but they're the main reason why I became successful. (And if you're reading this Mr. Vacek, my senior year teacher, you have my eternal gratitude as well.)

PLEASE try to send him an email or note telling him this. The Internet makes it easy. I found my 3rd grade teacher that way last year. She's 57 now, and I told her, "In my mind, you'll forever be 24." She emailed back, "In my mind, you'll forever be 8."

God, I loved that woman.

458 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:31:59pm

re: #456 Thanos

Kepler if you want to talk about something controversial in evolution try sypmatric vs. allopatric.

I saw those guys box in a little club outside of las vegas a coupla lifetimes ago..that's a true story....

459 Spiny Norman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:32:04pm

re: #455 ploome hineni

cilantro are the leaves of the coriander plant

and coriander seeds are very common in asian and Indian cooking

Cilantro - pronounced [sih-LAHN-troh]
This member of the carrot family is also referred to as Chinese Parsley and Coriander. It is actually the leaves (and stems) of the Coriander plant. Cilantro has a very pungent odor and is widely used in Mexican, Caribbean and Asian cooking. The Cilantro leaves look a bit like flat Italian parsley and in fact are related.

You know what that means? They had a ::gasp:: common ancestor!

Now you've done it...

460 Cartman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:32:42pm

re: #435 Noam Sayin'

You'd think a real improvement would be a leaner, meaner browser rather than a bunch of crappy new features I didn't ask for.

My main complaints are browser scrolling hitches and also with some XHTML 1.0 Transitional issues. Also, some of the add-on developers seem to be playing catch-up making their code compliant. Other than that, I still like FF!

461 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:33:18pm
462 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:33:25pm

/pimf "sympatric"

463 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:33:28pm

I'm going to bed
Goodnight battling lizards.
CHANGE!
COURAGE!

464 theparson  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:33:49pm

Good night, Mrs Callabash... where ever you are!

465 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:35:16pm

I leave the boys choir here to chortle, hi-five one another in a successful attack against God as the creator, wonder what you win. And for those that claim they believe in God or are Christians and believe in Classical evolution, you don't know your faith, or evolution. Classical evolution says man descended from apes, slowly evolving to humans. But in order to believe in the Bible, or the main point of redemption, there must be a belief in the doctrine of original sin.

Sin came into the world through one man, it can be taken out by one man. That is an ironclad doctrine, your whole faith stands or falls on that one point. Christian or Jew. For the Christian the Savior already came and took that sin away to those that believe. For the Jew he is yet to come but he will do the same thing...take away the sin nature of man. To allow evolution as part of your belief system destroys your faith that only God can deliver us from this nature. And once that is done you will then rely on false and man made religions to try to do what only Christ can do.

Do any of you wonder that the self-righteousness and man made religions are coming from the left? They must seek a human perfection, and having destroyed a faith in God (like many of you here are in the process of doing, and having a great time while you are doing it) they invent religions of government rule, of Global Warming earth worshiping fetishes, that will not save the earth, but destroy the civilizations that are the only answer to save the earth from the sin of man.

ID may not be science and has flaws, and even bad motives by some, but the attitude growing here is no answer and smacks of the fascism of the left.

466 sojerofgod  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:36:48pm

re: #454 theparson

Oh sorry, I had started to make a joke but got distracted, then when i came back i forgot to remove the reference before i said something completely different.

my bad

467 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:37:56pm

re: #465 Kepler Sings

I leave the boys choir here to chortle, hi-five one another in a successful attack against God as the creator, wonder what you win. And for those that claim they believe in God or are Christians and believe in Classical evolution, you don't know your faith, or evolution. Classical evolution says man descended from apes, slowly evolving to humans. But in order to believe in the Bible, or the main point of redemption, there must be a belief in the doctrine of original sin.

Sin came into the world through one man, it can be taken out by one man. That is an ironclad doctrine, your whole faith stands or falls on that one point. Christian or Jew. For the Christian the Savior already came and took that sin away to those that believe. For the Jew he is yet to come but he will do the same thing...take away the sin nature of man. To allow evolution as part of your belief system destroys your faith that only God can deliver us from this nature. And once that is done you will then rely on false and man made religions to try to do what only Christ can do.

Do any of you wonder that the self-righteousness and man made religions are coming from the left? They must seek a human perfection, and having destroyed a faith in God (like many of you here are in the process of doing, and having a great time while you are doing it) they invent religions of government rule, of Global Warming earth worshiping fetishes, that will not save the earth, but destroy the civilizations that are the only answer to save the earth from the sin of man.

ID may not be science and has flaws, and even bad motives by some, but the attitude growing here is no answer and smacks of the fascism of the left.


Kepler thinks all Christians who also support the theory of evolution are Takfir.

468 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:38:32pm

re: #361 Noam Sayin'

Some hinky things going on with LGF right now, Charles. Load times are long, got logged out, refresh comments and show ratings take a long time, too.

picky, picky, picky.

469 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:41:09pm
470 Charles  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:42:02pm

re: #465 Kepler Sings

Sin came into the world through one man, it can be taken out by one man. That is an ironclad doctrine, your whole faith stands or falls on that one point. Christian or Jew. For the Christian the Savior already came and took that sin away to those that believe. For the Jew he is yet to come but he will do the same thing...take away the sin nature of man. To allow evolution as part of your belief system destroys your faith that only God can deliver us from this nature. And once that is done you will then rely on false and man made religions to try to do what only Christ can do.

Oooh kay.

471 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:44:26pm
472 Student of Objectivism  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:44:41pm

our highschools are fucking jokes. Teachers aren't examined, and their teaching isn't evaluated. Some high school teachers are the scum of the Earth.

Elementary schools teach a few things:

1. native americans are the model people
2. mankind is evil for touching the environment
3. save water
4. don't use drugs for any reason, to any degree
5. don't have sex
6. don't judge, everyone is the same, all opinions are valid

the education system produces a nation that can worship a Obama

473 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:48:00pm

re: #465 Kepler Sings

I leave the boys choir here to chortle, hi-five one another in a successful attack against God as the creator, wonder what you win.

A loud accusation of faith-bashing where none has occurred.

474 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:50:10pm

re: #465 Kepler Sings

For the Christian the Savior already came and took that sin away to those that believe. For the Jew he is yet to come but he will do the same thing...take away the sin nature of man.

I'm amazed. You know even less about Christian and Jewish religious doctrine than you do about evolutionary theory. That's... a kind of accomplishment, I suppose.

(okay, really off to bed now, again)

475 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:50:16pm

re: #471 ploome hineni

no baby, you got it all wrong

Instruct my retarded self

476 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:52:09pm

re: #470 Charles

So you know differently? That is the opening premises of the Bible. Man is fallen, he needs redemption, he cannot work out that redemption on his own efforts. Show me otherwise. I am not talking whether you personally believe that, just show me it is NOT the premise.

477 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:53:22pm

So the Christ is not given to take away the sin of man? The Jews have a different doctrine? A different Old Testament?

478 Occasional Reader  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:54:15pm

Couldn't pass this up first, from Kepler Sings:

why did not the tigers, supposedly, under the same compulsion, also grow longer and longer legs?

So I guess that evolutionary theory (as KS understands it) predicts that all species on Earth should inevitably disappear into the maw of one top predator. Who would then, of course, die of hunger.

Apply the same logic to business, and I guess that every company in the United States should be a big-box retail chain. Or something like that.

479 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:54:33pm

re: #477 Kepler Sings

So the Christ is not given to take away the sin of man? The Jews have a different doctrine? A different Old Testament?

ooooooooohla!

480 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 8:55:56pm

re: #477 Kepler Sings

So the Christ is not given to take away the sin of man? The Jews have a different doctrine? A different Old Testament?

we call it Torah and it's in Hebrew, has some stuff which is easily lost in translation

481 Mr. Beamish  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:00:22pm

Student: So how do you know ID is not a scientific theory?

Teacher: Because scientists said so.

Student: Can I use that answer on a test?

Teacher: Er, um..

482 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:01:13pm

re: #478 Occasional Reader

No I used it as an example of just one of the multiple errors of logic in evolutionary thought. The same exists when fierce completion is used to explain the long neck of the giraffe. Yet all female species of giraffe are shorter. How did they survive? How did anything survive when it was evolving? Not a very good species A anymore, but not yet a species B. So all other species that were helping to drive the competition for resources abandoned eating species A and one half until it completed it evolutionary journey to species B?

And of course (wink, wink) no fossils preserved of any transition between A and B. Incredible what blind allegiance will allow otherwise intelligent people to accept without question. Look at my treatment when I question. This is a faith and a damn mean one at that, no wonder men like Hitler, Stalin, and the ruthless tycoons of the late 19th century liked it so much. Religious intolerance is no respecter of persons.

483 David Simon  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:03:46pm

re: #457 goddessoftheclassroom

PLEASE try to send him an email or note telling him this.

Hmm. What a great idea. I wonder if the school is allowed to help me find him?

484 mossley  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:04:14pm

re: #74 gunjam

.

The implication here is that folks who are convinced of the truth of evolutionary THEORY seem to be insisting on the excommunication -- the PURGING, if you will -- of teachers who do not subscribe "from their hearts" to the prevailing "orthodoxy."

(Shades of the medieval Roman Catholic authorities who had Galileo imprisoned, perhaps? Or, better: The rise of a militant insistence on the enforcement of a secular evolutionary shari'a?)

Count me in as a supporter of John Freshwater.

Your emphasis on the word theory, as if that is something bad, only highlights your total ignorance of science and the scientific method.

Your support for a man who physically injured a student just reveals a lot about your lack of humanity.

485 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:06:30pm
486 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:07:11pm
487 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:07:15pm

re: #465 Kepler Sings

And for those that claim they believe in God or are Christians and believe in Classical evolution, you don't know your faith, or evolution.

Do you agree with phillip johnson that we're irrational?

488 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:08:44pm

re: #471 ploome hineni

So tell me ploomie what does the day of atonement mean to you? What is the meaning of the goat of removal. We can just stick to the Pentateuch and if the imagery of the function of Christ is not what I said, show me, or do you just yip at the heels of the horses?

I have not even mentioned the passover and the blood on the door posts so that death might passover those (under the blood). Nor of the imagery of the ark of the covenant and the mercy seat, or all the imagery of the Tabernacle, or the Temple, nor of the various sacrifices for particular sins that were to be taken away permanently by the Christ. What the heck do you believe?

489 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:09:53pm
490 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:10:23pm

I believe Kepler sings is a trolling ass, and a sounding brass.

491 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:10:42pm

Kepler are you here trying to perfect the jews or something?

492 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:10:48pm

re: #485 ploome hineni

Why are you so upset, do you know? What do you believe, or do you damn well believe anything anymore? Good enough to go with the crowd here?

493 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:10:51pm

re: #489 ploome hineni

FUCK YOU

/I doubt anyone would.

494 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:12:09pm

re: #491 Thanos

Kepler are you here trying to perfect the jews or something?

I think he's also here to bash evolution believing Christians.

495 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:12:32pm
Kepler Sings

(Logged in)
Registered since: Nov 29, 2007 at 6:03 pm

No. of comments posted: 73
No. of links posted: 0

496 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:12:50pm
497 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:12:56pm

re: #491 Thanos

No. ploomie started raging at me, I don't care if someone is a Jew, Christian, or atheist, but if they challenge what I know, and assume some knowledge they can show me without frothing at the mouth, can' they?

498 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:13:27pm

re: #494 Sharmuta

I think he's also here to bash evolution believing Christians.


That too. My money's on dominionist.

499 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:14:02pm

re: #496 ploome hineni

Huh? I think you have issues I am not aware of...sorry.

500 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:14:44pm
501 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:14:59pm

re: #491 Thanos

/Maybe it is Ann Coulter using a sockpuppet?

502 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:15:46pm
503 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:16:41pm

re: #497 Kepler Sings

No. ploomie started raging at me, I don't care if someone is a Jew, Christian, or atheist, but if they challenge what I know, and assume some knowledge they can show me without frothing at the mouth, can' they?


you,sir,are not the be all and the end all of knowledge..your BELIEF is truth ONLY to you..you hold no secrets or keys to hidden locks,,if anything,you are a perfect example of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing...

504 mossley  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:17:54pm

re: #465 Kepler Sings

Actually, people who think you can't believe in evolution and religion have no understanding of either topic. Religion deals with matters of faith. Science deals with the physical world. They are two totally different aspects of existence. You can no more prove that God doesn't exist with science than you can disprove a scientific fact based on religion.

505 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:17:58pm
506 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:18:10pm

re: #498 Thanos

What's interesting is I was just reading about the origins of the Christian fundamentalist movement. Funny- evolution wasn't really an issue for them.

507 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:19:33pm

re: #498 Thanos

re: #494 Sharmuta

Show me how you can square classical evolutionary theory and the doctrine of original sin, and I will be quite. Your faith is undermined and eventually destroyed if you hold onto two mutually exclusive ideas. I am not talking about age of the universe or if there were Neanderthals either. I don't care if there were. But man is a distinct creation with a life breathed in by God....he is a triune being of Body, Soul, Spirit, and our spirit is darkened and fallen. This is basic Bible 101 where do you people get your faith, or your Christianity? On T.V.? And for the secularist he can use the history of man to see the fallen nature...or just look at his kids when they disobey, if the Bible viewpoint is not good enough.

508 reine.de.tout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:19:38pm

re: #505 ploome hineni

........well

there goes the kinder gentler ploomie

:D

Ploome - he is an idiot - not worth the energy or effort. But sometimes, you just gotta do what ya gotta do . . .

509 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:21:17pm
510 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:21:40pm

re: #502 ploome hineni


my issues are with shit like you..and your corruption of MY BIBLE

FUCK YOU


Try reading it sometime, sounds like you missed the actual point.

511 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:24:10pm

re: #510 Kepler Sings

stop patronizing the Jews here, we do read it far more frequently than you do, ..and in the original, with the commentaries you have not heard of.

512 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:24:12pm
513 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:24:38pm

So, Lizards,

It has been quite awhile since it was necessary that we have a scholarly discussion re Mr. Holland's Opus...

514 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:25:31pm
515 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:25:36pm

re: #507 Kepler Sings

They are only mutually exclusive if you personally choose to make them so.

Being an aetheist I'd be hard pressed to explain the faith I thorougly lack to you.

Now can you show me how to un-eat the apple? I don't think so, the garden's long gone, so give it over science and knowledge are here to stay until the end of times.

516 Inquisitive  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:29:30pm

re: #485 ploome hineni

the Jews have a Bible

FUCK your FUCKING old testament


Sorry but I had to .......take it out on him please for his believies, but it's a little harsh to others that believe in the old testament

517 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:29:58pm

re: #513 NY Nana

I am new here,
watched the video, don't get it. There must be something you ain't telling, right?

518 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:30:44pm

re: #504 mossley

Actually if we were not created from a single man and woman, then the Bible is a lie, and there is no need or purpose for Christ. Just because Christians are ignorant as to the implications of laying in bed with a theory that will destroy their faith is not a good reason to to not speak out.

The Bible stands or falls on the premise we came from a single set of parents, we were therefor all the progeny of parents that sinned and fell in their connection to God. All human history has been a display to man that he cannot redeem himself. We cannot govern ourselves, control ourselves. We are destroying our planet, we destroy everything, it is in us to destroy. It is in us to hate before we love, to spew anger before peace, to grasp before we give.

Just because millions of Christians have not been taught the basics of their faith is not a good reason to accept every theory and word of the snake again and again. Yeah we keep eating at the tree of knowledge, thinking we will be like God.

519 Zoomie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:31:39pm

Natural selection is an amazing thing given that it is neither energy nor matter but rather a natural process.

- An existing organism has offspring.
- No two offspring are the same due to genetic variance.
- The fittest survive.
- The mechanism that controls survival of the fittest is natural selection.
- The fittest is defined by the variant offspring with the greatest survival rate.
- Natural selection operates to select the fittest. The fittest are defined as those that survive in the biggest numbers and can make successful offspring, success being more offspring. Thus natural selection selects the offspring that survive in greatest quantity and natural selection does not select the offspring that are least adapted and eventually fail to multiply.

So parents have offspring with variant traits.
Natural selection selects the fittest offspring.
The fittest are those that survive and produce.
So the unfit do not survive and produce in sufficient quantity.
Natural selection selects the descendants that survive.
Natural selection does not select the descendants that do not survive.

Natural selection is not a force on the electromagnetic spectrum. It is a logical construct.

As a process it is amazing, because it never fails. It always selects the survivor and never selects the non-survivor. It can also be described as a tautology.

520 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:31:41pm

re: #516 Inquisitive

Sorry but I had to .......take it out on him please for his believies, but it's a little harsh to others that believe in the old testament

oh fercrissakes..

521 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:32:47pm
522 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:34:53pm

re: #514 ploome hineni

I will keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel you

/Desperate times call for desperate measures!

{Ploomie}

Charles?

Is Stinky working late? Help! Kepler Sings rants is driving us up the wall!

523 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:35:27pm

re: #519 Zoomie

Actually that's not quite right. "the fittest for the environment usually survives" is a better way to state it.

Picture a herd, two bulls, lots of cows. Now the bulls square off to see who is dominant, and who will mate with the cows -- they charge. The fittest, strongest bull stumbles on a random rock and breaks his neck. The weaker bull's genes get reproduced a lot.

524 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:36:48pm
525 neocon hippie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:37:01pm

re: #472 Student of Objectivism

our highschools are fucking jokes. Teachers aren't examined, and their teaching isn't evaluated. Some high school teachers are the scum of the Earth.

Elementary schools teach a few things:

1. native americans are the model people
2. mankind is evil for touching the environment
3. save water
4. don't use drugs for any reason, to any degree
5. don't have sex
6. don't judge, everyone is the same, all opinions are valid

the education system produces a nation that can worship a Obama

Don't have sex? I thought the problem in public schools was early sex education, and that to speak positively of abstinence was anathema.

526 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:37:03pm
527 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:37:53pm

re: #518 Kepler Sings

Actually if we were not created from a single man and woman, then the Bible is a lie, and there is no need or purpose for Christ. Just because Christians are ignorant as to the implications of laying in bed with a theory that will destroy their faith is not a good reason to to not speak out.

The Bible stands or falls on the premise we came from a single set of parents, we were therefor all the progeny of parents that sinned and fell in their connection to God. All human history has been a display to man that he cannot redeem himself. We cannot govern ourselves, control ourselves. We are destroying our planet, we destroy everything, it is in us to destroy. It is in us to hate before we love, to spew anger before peace, to grasp before we give.

Just because millions of Christians have not been taught the basics of their faith is not a good reason to accept every theory and word of the snake again and again. Yeah we keep eating at the tree of knowledge, thinking we will be like God.

I'm actually beginning to BELIEVE that you could use some serious psychological help,friend...your ranting is indicative of a person with a weak faith,who fears his whole interior existence just might be built on a shaky house of cards,an illusion for children to keep the bogeyman away..

528 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:39:03pm
529 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:40:24pm

re: #528 ploome hineni

not to mention absolute concrete thinking


with which to beat OUR heads against..

530 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:41:12pm

re: #528 ploome hineni

I had to look that up:

" Concrete Thinking
Inability or diminished capacity to form abstractions or to think using abstract categories. The patient is unable to consider and formulate hypotheses or to grasp and apply metaphors. Only one layer of meaning is attributed to each word or phrase and figures of speech are taken literally. Consequently, nuances are not detected or appreciated. A common feature of schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, and certain organic disorders."
531 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:41:25pm

re: #512 ploome hineni

Not MY point. The point in being a better human being. I did nothing to you but your hatred to me is total. I have no problem believing you could kill with that kind of hatred. Even YOUR Bible speaks about the sort of spirit you are moving in. You must be mistaking me for someone that threw Jews into ovens, cause that is the level of your hatred. I don't proselyte anyone.

And you do not own the scriptures, they are for all mankind, if I believe they pointed to a Christ that already came and people filled with hatred killed him that is my lookout. If you do not have a living hatred of Christ and Christianity then what is your beef? Look to your own spirit, I know I have nothing against you, or any people for just being those people. I do not even have anything against Muslims, but feel sorry for them, born under a darkness they had nothing to do with.

532 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:44:15pm

re: #527 joecitizen

Faith doesn't count here you will have to prove me cRaZy..heh

533 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:44:26pm

re: #531 Kepler SingsI do believe that if we were in the same room right now I would slap you upside your useless head on general principle.

534 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:44:40pm
535 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:45:14pm
536 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:45:14pm

re: #532 Kepler Sings

Faith doesn't count here you will have to prove me cRaZy..heh


you've done that quite well yourself,fella..

537 Thanos  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:45:21pm

Well time for me to get some sleeps, play nice.


Kepler, a song for you

It's kinda new testamenty.

538 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:45:22pm

re: #517 2by2


From LGF FAQ's...an edumacation!

Q. What’s Mr. Holland’s Opus got to do with anything?
A. Go to the LGF Prayer thread. First used on LGF by poster Occasional Reader.

539 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:46:23pm

re: #533 joecitizen

I do believe that if we were in the same room right now I would slap you upside your useless head on general principle.

Not worth your effort.

540 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:46:38pm

re: #533 joecitizen

Sure you would

541 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:46:39pm

re: #535 ploome hineni

I think he may be here to blacken the reputation of the true believers.

542 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:46:58pm
543 Ojoe  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:47:38pm

re: #518 Kepler Sings

Dude!

The words have been there all along

But over time we understand them better

John XXIII said that

And you might profitably become a little less rigid in your thinking


19. How is Sacred Scripture to be read?

109-119
137

Sacred Scripture must be read and interpreted with the help of the Holy Spirit and under the guidance of the Magisterium of the Church according to three criteria: 1) it must be read with attention to the content and unity of the whole of Scripture; 2) it must be read within the living Tradition of the Church; 3) it must be read with attention to the analogy of faith, that is, the inner harmony which exists among the truths of the faith themselves.

That's from the Catholic compendium of the catechism. you can access the whole thing at:
The Vatican's website

544 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:47:44pm

re: #539 NY Nana

Not worth your effort.

honor is no effort,Nana

545 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:48:55pm

I get a kick out of:

1) This post by Charles.

2) The ignorance of it all.

First and foremost, the alleged branding by the teacher is interesting in that no real criminal charges have been filed (did the whole class hold the kid down to do that much branding on such a large area of the arm or what are the details of the event?)

Creationism was taught in many public schools throughout the US until the 1960's (that would be about 100-200 years) when liberalism finally began to make major advances against America's Christian heritge.

Lastly, even though Christianity is all about the person and Christ, I have found not one item in the Bible about something about the earth that was not supported by science:

i.e. Charles and NASA was excited this week to find ice on Mars as the presence of water means for life to exist on Mars there first must be water there. So lets compare that to;

Genesis 1: 1 & 2 In the beginning ... And the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

546 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:49:33pm

re: #544 joecitizen

honor is no effort,Nana

You are right.

547 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:50:30pm

re: #536 joecitizen

The problem is that down deep you KNOW I am not, but want points here with the hi-five crew. It is yourself that is weak, like most in America today, we believe in nothing, so we fight for nothing. The Muslims are eating our lunch because of this, and they have hardly any science at all. You will be arguing this stupid shit and they will be honor killing your daughters. Already got a good start in Europe, just a preview of what is coming here.

548 Optimizer  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:51:45pm

re: #184 HelloDare

Just spun this off upstairs.

Put oil firm chiefs on trial, says NASA climate change scientist.

James Hansen, one of the world's leading climate scientists, will today call for the chief executives of large fossil fuel companies to be put on trial for high crimes against humanity and nature, accusing them of actively spreading doubt about global warming in the same way that tobacco companies blurred the links between smoking and cancer.

Hansen will use the symbolically charged 20th anniversary of his groundbreaking speech to the US Congress - in which he was among the first to sound the alarm over the reality of global warming - to argue that radical steps need to be taken immediately if the "perfect storm" of irreversible climate change is not to become inevitable.

Speaking before Congress again, he will accuse the chief executive officers of companies such as ExxonMobil and Peabody Energy of being fully aware of the disinformation about climate change they are spreading.

Funny - what I've observed is that the fossil fuel industries have as many "Green" commercials as not, and that the most serious opponents of St. Al & Co are not funded by them at all. It sounds to me, in fact, that Mulva (CEO of ConocoPhillips) has climbed on board just like "W" and McCain.

I can hardly wait to see Glenn Beck go nuts on this. He would call this "the crazy train flying off the tracks".

This is NOT the behavior of a scientist. Imprison or kill people who don't believe my theory? That's how religious extremists treat apostates.

It is especially remarkable that these moonbats would celebrate the 20th anniversary of his "must act now" speech. Little has been done, and the CO2 level has risen steadily, yet the catastrophes he predicted didn't happen.

The models predicted runaway warming, but there has been no additional warming at all in 10 years. A scientist would conclude that the theory has been conclusively disproven.

In an interview with the Guardian he said: "When you are in that kind of position, as the CEO of one the primary players who have been putting out misinformation even via organizations that affect what gets into school textbooks, then I think that's a crime."

Talk about projection. Even my kid's ENGLISH exam wasn't safe from this fascist - they have to write an essay about the supposedly endangered polar bears. Biology class wasn't safe - Gore's operatives showed up preaching. And Global Studies included the idea that international government was necessary to deal with this all-important issue. Last year, in Middle School, they showed Gore's movie as part of the curriculum in Earth Science.

549 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:51:49pm

re: #541 jaunte

I think he may be here to blacken the reputation of the true believers.

Jaunte,

And in trying? He is only blackening his reputation, if he had one to begin with.

550 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:52:01pm

re: #542 ploome hineni

Busted so you scuttle away. That was pure hatred, recognize it, find the source, repent, and live a different life...that is the meaning of scripture, commentators or not.

551 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:52:07pm

re: #531 Kepler Sings

"I believe they pointed to a Christ that already came and people filled with hatred killed him"
..and since ploome hineni is filled with hatred, it certainly follows that he and his hate filled companions aka the Jews killed him, right?
That's quite an offensive statement, and would fit far better into the year 1494; you are an ignorant person, who doesn't understand a nickel's worth of what we (the Jews) went through because of your screwed up theology.

552 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:53:48pm

re: #549 NY Nana

I'm serious about that sounding brass reference.

553 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:53:56pm

re: #547 Kepler Sings

The problem is that down deep you KNOW I am not, but want points here with the hi-five crew. It is yourself that is weak, like most in America today, we believe in nothing, so we fight for nothing. The Muslims are eating our lunch because of this, and they have hardly any science at all. You will be arguing this stupid shit and they will be honor killing your daughters. Already got a good start in Europe, just a preview of what is coming here.


is mind reading a particularly christian art form? 'cause you suck at it,big time...

554 Christopher Luebcke  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:53:57pm

re: #548 Optimizer

It wasn't Mulva, it was Dolores.

555 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:54:32pm
556 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:55:00pm

Do you people actually take an argument on face value? Is it so incredible to you that someone is not here intriguing, or playing some blogging games? It is actually a fraternity handshake thing...checking out if everyone agrees with you, then feeling all comfortable when you get the feedback. That kind of thinking is evidence of minds that have too long swum in the same stagnant waters. Get out and live a little.

557 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:55:18pm
558 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:56:20pm

re: #551 2by2

"I believe they pointed to a Christ that already came and people filled with hatred killed him"
..and since ploome hineni is filled with hatred, it certainly follows that he and his hate filled companions aka the Jews killed him, right?
That's quite an offensive statement, and would fit far better into the year 1494; you are an ignorant person, who doesn't understand a nickel's worth of what we (the Jews) went through because of your screwed up theology.

oops..meant to ding ya up..sorry!

559 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:56:22pm

re: #552 jaunte

And you are right.

560 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:56:34pm

re: #538 NY Nana

thanks, that helps.

561 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 9:59:21pm

re: #518 Kepler Sings

So you are a literalist. Tell me- where is the Garden of Eden and the Angel guarding the gate? Can't seem to find it on google maps.

562 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:00:00pm

re: #551 2by2

Since I am expressing quite ordinary Christian thought, and elucidating basic Christian doctrine, and I think, Jewish belief in the doctrine of sin, and ploomie's hatred was all about Christianity, or Christian claims she/he can wear any shoe that fits. Or are Jews exempt from expressing and moving in their own hatreds because of their own past persecutions? Nobody has an excuse to hate, and that is the example of Christ and the way he died. Whether he is fictional or not, the idea resounds as Divine.

563 Dr. Stu  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:01:57pm

I propose this same challenge whenever these threads go up, but still haven't received a reply and I probably never will. If ID is truly science, then please give just one example of a specific molecular biology experiment that would test an aspect of ID theory.

564 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:02:05pm

re: #562 Kepler Sings

Since I am expressing quite ordinary Christian thought, and elucidating basic Christian doctrine, and I think, Jewish belief in the doctrine of sin, and ploomie's hatred was all about Christianity, or Christian claims she/he can wear any shoe that fits. Or are Jews exempt from expressing and moving in their own hatreds because of their own past persecutions? Nobody has an excuse to hate, and that is the example of Christ and the way he died. Whether he is fictional or not, the idea resounds as Divine.

your quite ordinary Christian thought has helped to kill millions of Jews, please spare us your theology, believe me, we do know it by heart.

565 Optimizer  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:02:13pm

re: #554 Christopher Luebcke

It wasn't Mulva, it was Dolores.

Who's Dolores? I was following COP for a time, and got disturbed to hear their CEO (I thought his name was Mulva) talk about how we have to think in terms of the "cost of carbon". Then the company joined some corporate eco-group whose name escapes me but which also included CAT.

566 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:02:19pm
567 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:03:37pm

re: #560 2by2

Use it in good health! And welcome to LGF a few days too late!

568 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:04:24pm

Sharmuta says: where is the Garden of Eden and the Angel guarding the gate? Can't seem to find it on google maps.

He! he! Seems that the great flood wiped out a lot of things and then the breaking up of a major continent that science supports didn't help matters for the garden. He! He!

569 Zoomie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:04:41pm

re: #523 Thanos

Yes Thanos you are correct. I'll add this to the construct:

The fittest are those that survive and produce. They may not be the smartest or strongest.

570 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:06:06pm

re: #568 six-gun-neo-con

Sharmuta says: where is the Garden of Eden and the Angel guarding the gate? Can't seem to find it on google maps.

He! he! Seems that the great flood wiped out a lot of things and then the breaking up of a major continent that science supports didn't help matters for the garden. He! He!

Yeah- that whole flood thing- also not supported by the evidence of the earth itself.

571 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:06:14pm

re: #567 NY Nana

thanks, happy to be here, even if a 'few days late'

572 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:06:25pm

Common, 2by2 show a little more intellect. False accusations and lies are such major sins...

573 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:06:43pm

re: #556 Kepler Sings

Do you people actually take an argument on face value? Is it so incredible to you that someone is not here intriguing, or playing some blogging games? It is actually a fraternity handshake thing...checking out if everyone agrees with you, then feeling all comfortable when you get the feedback. That kind of thinking is evidence of minds that have too long swum in the same stagnant waters. Get out and live a little.

You're obviously here on a singular agenda (84 comments and already saying "you people").

You're mind's closed but your mouth is still blabbing.

574 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:07:22pm

re: #555 ploome hineni

Kepler is what America fears

more than Obama

The banning stick can get rid of the troll/moby/froll, but only a smart electorate can get rid of Hussein.

575 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:08:25pm

re: #561 Sharmuta

Since the "Garden," was destroyed in Noah's flood or even before by the depradations of fallen man it is no longer to be found. So why would any angel need to hang around to guard the gate? And yes some sort of sea creature swallowed Jonah and spit him up on the beach. And the writer of that story knew enough to mention that Jonah was bleached white (gastric juices of the fish)..clever huh?

And no I don't believe the earth is 6 thousand years old, it is probably 5 billion or so. And yes I believe there were different levels of life on the earth through millions of years to prepare the earth for future levels of life, such as blue-green algae to produce our oxygen bearing atmosphere.

I just don't believe life jumped into existence from inorganic matter, no matter how many billions of years you wait. How species came about? Not sure, and neither are evolutionists. And only a fool would look at life and think there was not something purposely designed about it all. Keep searching for a label.

576 Optimizer  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:08:48pm

re: #527 joecitizen

Yeah, Kepler's really going a "step beyond" this time. Funny he should focus on one of the more immoral themes of the Old Testament - that sins can be inherited. Nobody should be held individually accountable for something they had no control over - a situation which is obviously the case for someone who was not even born yet when the offense occurred!

577 Sharmuta  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:08:50pm

Kepler- I'll even go so far as to say you're an uber-fundie. Countless theologians would tell you Genesis can, even should, be read as metaphorical.

578 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:09:55pm

re: #572 six-gun-neo-con

love to sin some more

579 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:09:59pm

re: #571 2by2

thanks, happy to be here, even if a 'few days late'

And it is great to have you here.

580 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:11:33pm

wwjp

581 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:12:33pm

not anything kepler would post

582 least  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:13:11pm

re: #287 Capt_Faust


/ Just food for thought, as to how some people see and X and they think Christian cross...hmmmmmm


Interesting . . . click my avatar and you'll see an image that is described as an "X shaped feature" at the Hubblesite.
heh, indeed!

Now, about this particular post: The source, Paul Sunstone, is not exactly a dispassionate observer -- but he does mirror the POV of many ID opponents:

It occurs to me, however, that we have here one instance of what’s going on in many hundreds — even thousands — of science classrooms across the country.


and the evidence for this claim is? . . . a poll. one poll that states that possibly one in 8 science teachers who were polled believe that God created things! The HORROR!

Apparently among his most ardent supporters are the members of a local Christian group that calls itself “Minutemen United“, and who envision themselves as existing “...to wage war against a culture of God-haters”.

Scare quotes bring up images of Jim Jones or Phelps and his Westboro freak-show. Danger! Danger!

But beyond the scare quotes you'll find this:

Minutemen United are individuals committed to furthering the cause of Christ through non-violent means . . . The Bible, the Word of God, is the only weapon we will use. Jesus told us that "greater love has no man than this, that he would lay down his life for his friends." We stand ready to do just that . . . . . . Minutemen United rejects the use of physical weapons, including guns, in the furtherance of God's righteous cause

Danger, indeed

583 Kepler Sings  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:13:54pm

re: #564 2by2

No, the intolerance and hatred I have seen here is what kills, nobody has a market on it. I think I remember God himself wanted at one time to kill all the Jews but Moses, is that a part of my Bible or yours?

Maybe it is time for a lot of Jews to forgive and quite using the holocaust, or persecutions instigated by a corrupt and fallen Christianity, not to mention the Muslims through history. Or continue the way you are, it is a choice isn't it?

584 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:14:33pm
585 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:14:49pm

re: #583 Kepler Sings Yours..it was just one city.

586 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:14:54pm

George Carlin dead in Los Angeles..he was 71

587 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:15:30pm

"quit using the holocaust"
I'm telling you this guy is a ringer.

588 Optimizer  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:15:36pm

re: #570 Sharmuta

Yeah- that whole flood thing- also not supported by the evidence of the earth itself.

But ... But ... I thought that if I voted for Obama it would go away, that He would make the oceans stop rising!

/sarc

589 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:16:13pm

re: #583 Kepler Sings
Story ends with..."And G*d went his way!

590 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:16:36pm

Kepler Sings Maybe it is time for a lot of Jews to forgive and quite using the holocaust, or persecutions instigated by a corrupt and fallen Christianity

Wow, that is a bald faced lie.

591 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:16:42pm

re: #586 joecitizen

George Carlin dead in Los Angeles..he was 71

He will be missed. How sad....

592 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:18:11pm

re: #587 jaunte

It is a POS..'forget the Holocaust'? NEVER.

Never forget, never forgive.

593 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:19:01pm

re: #583 Kepler Sings

meaning:(without the ornaments)
"you're bringing it onto yourself with that hatred of yours"
that's also a quite time worn and proven theory, congrats, you're hitting a grand slam tonight.

594 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:19:01pm

And the goat thing is the 'scape goat.....It is set free, NOT sacrificed, and it is for unintended/unknown sins. Your dogma sucks.

595 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:23:47pm

583=reportable offense
buh bye!

596 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:24:50pm
597 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:25:03pm

Sharmuta Yeah- that whole flood thing- also not supported by the evidence of the earth itself.

Amazing, explain how come oil, derived from the combination of algae found in the sea and pressure is found thousands of feet below land? Or coal produced by the combination of pressure and plant life is well below the ground and plant life? Huh?

598 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:27:05pm

Not just a bigot, but a biblically ignorant bigot!

599 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:27:09pm
600 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:29:07pm

re: #597 six-gun-neo-con

Sharmuta Yeah- that whole flood thing- also not supported by the evidence of the earth itself.

Amazing, explain how come oil, derived from the combination of algae found in the sea and pressure is found thousands of feet below land? Or coal produced by the combination of pressure and plant life is well below the ground and plant life? Huh?


you drinkin' out there tonight six?

601 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:30:53pm

wwbp

602 swamprat  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:32:43pm

I need a "What Would Buddha Do?" bumpersticker!

603 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:33:28pm
604 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:33:59pm
605 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:34:13pm

Joecitizen you drinkin' out there tonight six?

Nah. someones got to be the designated driver around here. HEH!

606 jaunte  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:34:24pm

re: #604 ploome hineni

Goodnight ploome.

607 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:36:10pm

re: #604 ploome hineni

ok babies

my eyes are closing


thankfully you do not go gentle into that good night...next time,eh?

608 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:38:15pm

re: #582 least

Minutemen United are individuals committed to furthering the cause of Christ through non-violent means . . . The Bible, the Word of God, is the only weapon we will use. Jesus told us that "greater love has no man than this, that he would lay down his life for his friends." We stand ready to do just that . . . . . . Minutemen United rejects the use of physical weapons, including guns, in the furtherance of God's righteous cause
Danger, indeed

There was more about the Minutemen on the same page:

• Successfully lobbying Meijer, a regional grocery store to remove "entry-level porn" magazines from their shelves
• Defending Pastor Art "the Breadman" Whilhite from a venomous zoning board that was trying to prevent him from distributing food to millions of people across the country, from his personal residence.
Aiding a local Columbus community in ousting a homosexual bathouse from their neighborhood
• We were there to protest the removal of the Ten Commandments from Adams county, Ohio and travelled to Montgomery Alabama to stand along side Judge Roy Moore

Looks like their specialty is to curtail individual rights.

609 Zoomie  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:45:49pm

So the best science tells us we are here by descent from a common ancestor by way of natural selection of the best adapted for the environment from among the offspring, all with variation.

The best adapted for the environment are not measured by speed, size, color, strength, weakness, or intelligence. They are measured by the numeric survival rate in the environment.

I have run numerous visual and thought experiments testing natural selection and so far it has never failed. First, I look for the offspring with variation. If the organism exists natural selection worked, because it exists today. If it dies or does not exist, natural selection also worked. So it has been 100% successful as a mechanism. Organisms that do exist had to be selected by natural selection, and organisms that do not exist (extinguished lines) had to be NOT selected by natural selection. It is a powerful theory. So powerful, that it is really difficult to devise an experiment to falsify it.

610 NY Nana  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:45:51pm

G'nite, all, except the POS....

Ploomie, good luck..if you need me to bake a cake with a nail file after the traffic court gig, let me know!

611 Optimizer  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:54:18pm

re: #602 swamprat

I need a "What Would Buddha Do?" bumpersticker!

Or, maybe, one for "What would FSM do?"

Have YOU been "touched by His noodly appendage?"...

:)

612 2by2  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:56:15pm

re: #610 NY Nana

nite and thx again for the warm welcome

613 gman  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 10:58:53pm

More of Daubenmire's stunning intellect on display:

It is important to understand that if we continue to call homosexuality a civil-rights issue we will never fight our way out of the box that they have locked us in. Homosexuality is not a civil rights issue. It is a health issue. If we fail to recognize this most important premise the battle over homosexuality will meander down the path of abortion. Please understand both homosexuality and abortions bring death.

614 justadot  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:01:53pm

re: #547 Kepler Sings

It is yourself that is weak, like most in America today, we believe in nothing, so we fight for nothing. The Muslims are eating our lunch because of this, and they have hardly any science at all.

Damn, what a whiney defeatist asshole.

615 George guy  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:03:38pm

In 9th grade science (Earth science), I kept my mouth shut about the whole business of naturalism versus creationism as far as getting through the class. The reason being that first the teacher wasn't making much ado about asserting a 4.5 billion year old earth, and there was enough actual science being taught that making a big fuss about those details would have interfered with the good stuff. A second reason I kept my mouth shut was that when another classmate started objecting to some of the material being taught, the teacher made an unassailable argument to the effect of this: "Look, I'm not here to necessarily challenge your beliefs. I recognize that there are people who take this seriously. But you might eventually have to defend your position in an argument, and if you must do that, you should comprehend what you are arguing against. If you don't, you're going to embarrass yourself horribly."

That's why I am annoyed far more by creationists who are illiterate in the evolutionist position-- including this teacher who complicates that simple problem with an abusive personality-- than, say by the evolutionist position being entrenched in the public school curriculum. Religious conviction has the power to make people stop thinking about whatever might possibly conflict with that conviction, which is disastrous no matter how it turns out. You might end up opposing truth and reason, or perhaps even worse, end up losing something good because you failed to use reason to defend it.

616 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:19:52pm

Yeah, well, like I always say:

Fish eggs still hatch fish, and not people. Always have, always will.

Tadpoles always turn into frogs, and not people. Always have, always will.

Monkeys always give birth to monkeys, and not people. Always have, always will.

617 Optimizer  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:23:39pm

re: #614 justadot

Damn, what a whiney defeatist asshole.

Worse than that. It suggests a false dicotomy: "You have to believe in what I believe in, or you believe in nothing."

Seems to me that what we need to believe in was laid out by the Founding Fathers 200+ years ago - things you won't find in the Bible. Individual rights ("Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" & the Bill of Rights) and government of, for, and by the people (Constitution). In short, "freedom". You know - that stuff our socialist public educational system doesn't want us to know.

I wish these clowns would stop trying to use this as an excuse to evangelize Christianity, while ignoring the things that not only define America, but which are the formula for our success. There are plenty of countries that are a lot more Christian than we are, but have not seen our success, so that's obviously not it. We need to reaffirm our core American values, not thump the Bible.

618 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:31:41pm

re: #583 Kepler Sings

You could not possibly be a bigger dick.

619 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:32:57pm

The loonies come out for these threads. I see why Charles continues to post them.

620 six-gun-neo-con  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:39:01pm

Optimizer

Seems to me that what we need to believe in was laid out by the Founding Fathers 200+ years ago - things you won't find in the Bible. Individual rights ("Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" & the Bill of Rights) and government of, for, and by the people (Constitution). In short, "freedom".

Oh my goodness, Optimizer. You just flunked "Founding Fathers 101"!

Thomas Jefferson
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights. . ."

The term inalienable rights (or unalienable rights) refers to a theoretical set of individual human rights that by their nature cannot be taken away, violated, or transferred from one person to another. They are considered more fundamental than alienable rights, such as rights in a specific piece of property. Inalienable (Individual) Rights are: natural rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Uh, fortunately Thomas Jefferson understood God and His written Word (the Bible) far better than you ever will...

621 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:44:03pm

re: #619 Killgore Trout

The loonies come out for these threads. I see why Charles continues to post them.

the continuing evolution of LGF..attempting to weed out as many weak links as he can

622 FinnAgain  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:53:05pm

So, if I properly understand the apologists' argument here... everything from RNA lineages to endogenous retroviruses are not scientific proof that is open to testing and refutation, but is in fact religion. Meanwhile, believing that God did it all... is science.

Bonus points for calling modern evolutionary biology "Darwinism" and not referring to the modern anti-science movement as "Beheism" or what have you.
Science doesn't work that way. The first guy who comes up with an idea is just the first guy. After that, it belongs to the scientific method, not any person or his followers. Religion is the belief system that believes in revealed truth and prophets. With science an idea has to stand or fall on its own.

Curiouser and curiouser.

re: #465 Kepler Sings

hi-five one another in a successful attack against God as the creator, wonder what you win.

Nobody that I've seen, (I may've missed something) is denying that a God or Gods may have been the Creator(s), possibly. People are denying that an untestable, unfalsifiable claim is in the realm of science, not faith. Of course, they're right. and that's the truth.
How could a God be threatened by the truth and consider it an attack?


But in order to believe in the Bible, or the main point of redemption, there must be a belief in the doctrine of original sin.

This is the exact opposite of an epistemologically sound argument, and the exact reverse of proper methodology.
One observes facts, constructs an hypothesis, sees how the facts fit in with that, tests it, attempts to refute it, and then constructs a working theory to explain the observed facts. (Evolution is an observed fact, the various competing theories of evolutionary mechanics aim at providing a framework with greater explanatory and predictive power)
The opposite, and 100% incorrect way of going about things, then, is to start with the conclusion and then cherrypick data in order to support it, while ignoring contradictory data.

If you feel that you must believe in certain parts of the bible, as literal truth, lest you burn in hell?
Well, you've admitted that you're not exactly approaching data objectively.


Sin came into the world through one man, it can be taken out by one man. That is an ironclad doctrine, your whole faith stands or falls on that one point. Christian or Jew. For the Christian the Savior already came and took that sin away to those that believe. For the Jew he is yet to come but he will do the same thing...take away the sin nature of man.

Nope. I suggest you read, say, any of a number of Jewish encyclopedias, because you obviously do not understand the first thing about Jewish theology. We don't have any concept of Original Sin. We don't believe that we need a savior, because we don't believe we've need to be 'saved'. And we've already got a yearly ritual that deals with the concept of sin quite nicely.


To allow evolution as part of your belief system destroys your faith that only God can deliver us from this nature. And once that is done you will then rely on false and man made religions to try to do what only Christ can do.

Faith does not, and can not disprove facts.
That's why they're called facts, and faith is called faith. If faith could rebut a factual claim, it'd be called proof.

You are certainly free to have faith in any of the many things that are beyond the structure of proof and refutation.
You are entitled to your own opinions.
You are not entitled to your own facts.

On any factual point where faith says one thing, and the truth says another, truth wins. Faith that Zeus causes lightning doesn't make it so. Likewise, facts have no power to gainsay aesthetic worldviews which posit an omnipotent being 'beyond' reality. That's why religion is a matter of faith, not a matter of science.
And that's why, properly, the two have nothing to say about the other's sphere.

623 joecitizen  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:57:16pm

re: #622 FinnAgain
excellent post..I for one would like to see you post more frequently.

624 Egfrow  Sun, Jun 22, 2008 11:57:23pm

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. Thomas Jefferson. (1813)

625 Killgore Trout  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:03:28am

re: #624 Egfrow

Amen.

626 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:03:33am

Great Presidents, Faith, Government, 101.

"Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens. The mere Politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle." George Washington

"Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged."
Ronald Reagan

627 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:06:53am

re: #597 six-gun-neo-con

Sharmuta Yeah- that whole flood thing- also not supported by the evidence of the earth itself.

Amazing, explain how come oil, derived from the combination of algae found in the sea and pressure is found thousands of feet below land? Or coal produced by the combination of pressure and plant life is well below the ground and plant life? Huh?

Tell me where in the geologic record we can find evidence to support a global flood.

628 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:07:43am

re: #623 joecitizen

excellent post..I for one would like to see you post more frequently.

Absolutely!

And a belated welcome to the newbie 2by2.

629 dhimmimoore  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:08:51am

re: #624 Egfrow

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. Thomas Jefferson. (1813)

Would this be both Jewish priests and Catholic priests? Or are you using this quote to attack just one religion?

And remember, evenagelicals have no priests.

630 George guy  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:09:12am

re: #609 Zoomie

So the best science tells us we are here by descent from a common ancestor by way of natural selection of the best adapted for the environment from among the offspring, all with variation.

The best adapted for the environment are not measured by speed, size, color, strength, weakness, or intelligence. They are measured by the numeric survival rate in the environment.

I have run numerous visual and thought experiments testing natural selection and so far it has never failed. First, I look for the offspring with variation. If the organism exists natural selection worked, because it exists today. If it dies or does not exist, natural selection also worked. So it has been 100% successful as a mechanism. Organisms that do exist had to be selected by natural selection, and organisms that do not exist (extinguished lines) had to be NOT selected by natural selection. It is a powerful theory. So powerful, that it is really difficult to devise an experiment to falsify it.

Consider a hypothetical population of deer. One day, one of them is born with a mutated form of one of the genes responsible for one of the enzymes involved in metabolizing body fat. Rather than wiping out the ability to metabolize body fat entirely, that process is reduced in efficiency by some small factor, so that less energy is extracted per unit of fat. Because of that, this deer may be a little bit slower during the winter. Is it going to die before passing on its genes? Not necessarily: if the disadvantage is small enough, this particular deer may survive. Natural selection ensures that anything obviously disadvantageous will die off quickly, but how many mutations can be described as nearly neutral, not giving enough of a disadvantage to matter over the course of one generation, adding up over time until it builds into a genetic disease time-bomb?

I expect that in order to examine that, it would require sequencing the genomes of at least several, preferably all, members of an experimental population every generation, until at least a few genetic diseases emerge and then work back to find out where they went together.

Now we've devised an experiment. Now all we need is [pinky] ONE BILLION DOLLARS![/pinky]

631 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:11:26am

And, um....

The problem with quoting the Founders on Faith is that most of them were not extremely religious men. I think they respected religion, but were not themselves very religious people. No where in the writings of Washington does he mention Jesus.

/Just sayin'

632 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:12:52am

re: #628 Sharmuta

thank you Sharmuta, as it is I'm in grave danger to become addicted to this site,
it's a pleasure to be here, loving every minute of it.

633 Slumbering Behemoth  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:13:31am

I've been out for most of the evening, an impromptu get away if you will. Anyhow, on my way back I noticed that the moon is now blood red.

I guess that must mean these are "The End Times". Or maybe it's just the effect of atmospheric smoke from local wild fires.

Hmmm...which way to lean? Apocalyptic superstition, or rational observation?

634 joecitizen  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:14:52am

re: #632 2by2

thank you Sharmuta, as it is I'm in grave danger to become addicted to this site,
it's a pleasure to be here, loving every minute of it.


common affliction of the high minded,superior beings..

635 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:22:32am

re: #634 joecitizen

common affliction of the high minded,superior beings..

that's comforting

636 Slumbering Behemoth  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 1:55:40am

re: #416 littleO

Besides, don't most of you here believe that most teachers who want to introduce religious aspects into the curricullum will do so in a reasonable and loving fashion?

The very topic of this thread, and much of the commentary within, would indicate that the answer to your question is "no".

Show of hands: How many of you would be totally accepting of a public school curriculum that taught your children that Zeus was the ultimate arbitrator on all matters of humankind, or that praying and making offerings to Poseidon would make for good sailing?

637 Slumbering Behemoth  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:27:50am

re: #465 Kepler Sings

If that morass of nonsensical bullshit is truly your opinion of LGF, and Lizards in general, I suggest you GTFO and "find a better blog".

The fact that you would try to pass this line of RCI thinking here...

ID may not be science and has flaws, and even bad motives by some, but the attitude growing here is no answer and smacks of the fascism of the left.

...shows that you haven't been paying even a minute amount of attention to the topics covered here, and the work that Charles and many other Lizards have done in the fight against fascism.

You, kepler, are a brain-dead, brainwashed, ideologue who is far more deserving of the titles "leftist" and "fascist" than those you futilely attempt to demonize.

In short, it is my opinion that you can fuck right off.

638 Slumbering Behemoth  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:35:37am

re: #482 Kepler Sings

Incredible what blind allegiance will allow otherwise intelligent people to accept without question.

Indeed.

639 Ojoe  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:37:43am

re: #636 Slumbering Behemoth

My hand does not go up ...

640 Slumbering Behemoth  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:54:25am

re: #518 Kepler Sings

We cannot govern ourselves, control ourselves. We are destroying our planet, we destroy everything, it is in us to destroy. It is in us to hate before we love, to spew anger before peace, to grasp before we give.

Projection.

641 Slumbering Behemoth  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:22:27am

re: #545 six-gun-neo-con

First and foremost, the alleged branding by the teacher

For fuck's sake, he admitted to doing it. Dimwit.

642 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:36:47am

re: #431 Kepler Sings


If the force of evolution drove horses to grow longer and longer legs[...] (as I was taught basic evolutionary non-sense in elementary school) why did not the tigers, supposedly, under the same compulsion, also grow longer and longer legs?

You admit your understanding is still at a grade school level?

Evolution works on populations not individuals. Selection pressures do not drive anybody to do/grow/be anything. Selection pressures weed out those who are less successful at surviving long enough to breed, breeding lots and having offspring that survive and produce many offspring. Tigers had the selection pressure to be better carnivores, not better leaf eaters This seems self evident. What confused you?

If you do not understand that selection pressures do not cause animals to "adapt",at all, but instead which of the animals are best suited to a certain environment...?

Now take a theory that arrogantly tries to explain life, or the origin of life but gives me less mathematical theory than how to design a simple electronic circuit.

No, abiogenesis is not the same as evolution, totally different fields. Evolution doesn't deal with the Big Bang, either. But yes, of course evolutionary biology is based on statistical modeling. Of course you handwave it away as 'mere' statistical methodology... while ignoring that population dynamics are all about statistical methodology. That's fair.

As should be obvious, biological populations don't operate under the same dynamics as circuit boards, because living things aren't circuit boards. Your argument is like saying that medicine is not science, because there is not one simple equation that will tell us how an untested drug will work in every individual. You should apply your math skills to the FDA, save us tax payers lots of cash.


Yet its claims are never substantiated.

Explain endogenous retroviruses.
Didn't think so.

just the end-point and known species.

1.Bull.
2. Bull (or make that, whale).
3. Bull (or make that, snake).
4. Evolution does not have 'start' and 'end' points. Every species alive is still evolving, everything is "transitional" if it goes on living. You just arbitrarily call it an "end" point. There are only evolutionary relative successes.
4. Your entire argument is a poor trick. If someone were to show you a fossil that fits between two others in chronological sequence, why... then you've got two gaps where before there was only one. Playing your game is a losing proposition.


And there is none, absolutely no systematic mathematical treatment of how one species evolves into another.

Speciation occurs when reproductive isolation is achieved. From that point on, shifts in allelic frequency lead it along a different path than the population it was split from. No math required.

a simple request for elegant understandable processes.

If the interactions of trillions of individual animals on a planet with trillions of environmental factors and random chance over billions of years isn't compressed into a single simple equation, then evolution is bunk.
Yep.


And I can damn well believe that God is the creator of life until proven otherwise.

No GodMath?


They act like they are defending a faith, and a very bad one at that.

They act like they're protecting western civilization from religious fundamentalists. You admit you attack science that disagrees with your religious book, and you wonder why people act as if you're trying to destroy education itself.

643 Slumbering Behemoth  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:59:48am

re: #642 FinnAgain

At the risk of sounding like a high-five-ing choir boy*, I would like to express agreement with some of my fellow Lizards that you should post here more often. We need all the anti-idotarians we can get here. You certainly fit in that category, and then some.

*Hey, kepler, right here buddy: t("t)

644 reine.de.tout  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:41:44am

re: #642 FinnAgain

Your post is a thing of beauty.

645 Zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:03:23am

re: #630 George guy

So in your case of the deer population...

Parents have offspring with variant traits, in this example an enzyme variation.
Natural selection selects the fittest offspring.
There is no such thing as a good or bad variant. A successful variant is defined as the ones that survive.

The fittest are those that survive and produce. They may or may not be the fattest or thinnest.
The unfit do not survive and produce in sufficient quantity.

Natural selection selects the descendants that survive.
Natural selection does not select the descendants that do not survive.

I do not think this can be falsified. It is true by definition.

646 Zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:21:55am

re: #642 FinnAgain

Evolution works on populations not individuals. Selection pressures do not drive anybody to do/grow/be anything. Selection pressures weed out those who are less successful at surviving long enough to breed, breeding lots and having offspring that survive and produce many offspring.

Lots of offspring....So successful natural selection is defined as...it survived to reproduce. If it did not survive and reproduce, it was not successful and was not selected by natural selection.

Do I have that right? Natural selection selects the adaptation that survives and breeds the most. Natural selection knows what to select by selecting the survivors. Except NS can't look backwards. So it waits to see what survived and then selects it?

If I see anything alive today, I know it was naturally selected.
If the species died out, I know it was not naturally selected.

NS has a perfect track record.

That is an iron clad argument. It is true by definition. It seems to me it is a tautology.

647 Nat-X  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 6:01:48am

re: #642 FinnAgain

I'm neither a creationist nor evolutionists, per se. I'm open-minded and thoughtfull, at least.

I hope many people react with this kind of outrage and disgust when "anthropogenic climate change" is taught in the classroom as "science" and the new religion of "green" is pushed by the schools (hell, it already is).

Two things that ID proponents and global warming alarmists have in common are non-disprovable theories and religious zeal when defending their beliefs.

What would disprove the theory of evolution? Would it be a certain finding like a fossilized skeleton, or would some giant old man with a long white beard have to appear in the sky and announce that evolution is false? Is evolution also non-disprovable?

I would be interested in what caused a population of four-legged land animals to collectively decide, over billions of years, that things are better in the ocean. Presto, legs turn into fins. Or likewise, that a population of sea creatures collectively yearned for the good life up on dry land, and over billions years, they too changed their fins into legs.

Don't tell me "billions and billions of years" caused it.

Just wondering.

648 Thanos  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 6:06:49am

re: #587 jaunte

"quit using the holocaust"
I'm telling you this guy is a ringer.

Yes I am beginning to think so. The VB/Ron Paul/dominiionist fundie paralell universes merge at certain points.

649 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 6:41:22am
650 Honorary Yooper  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 6:43:35am

re: #597 six-gun-neo-con

Sharmuta Yeah- that whole flood thing- also not supported by the evidence of the earth itself.

Amazing, explain how come oil, derived from the combination of algae found in the sea and pressure is found thousands of feet below land? Or coal produced by the combination of pressure and plant life is well below the ground and plant life? Huh?

Ever hear of plate tectonics?

1. Oil is found where there had previously been anoxic conditions in water, whether it had been a sea or simplay a lake. For example, oil is found in the Illinois Basin. The Illinois Basin had been a sea about 400 million years ago (based on radiometric dating), and later drained and the oil bearing rocks covered first by shallow-sea sediments, and then by more land based sediments. The anoxic conditions allow the plankton to decompose rather than simply be eaten by other sea life forms. If you want to see more recent oil being produced, look off the Mississippi River Delta and anxoic environments there. It's one reason why the Gulf has a lot of oil and gas.

2. Coal does not come from marine environments. It too, like oil, requires anoxic conditions. However, coal is decomposed an compressed plants that lived in swampy areas. A good example of an area in the starting phases of coal production is the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia. There, you can observe the layers of slowly decomposing vegetation by digging with a shovel. If you want to see it further along, visit a peat bog.

Now, you may ask yourself why coal is found below ground, or why it can be found in seams that are not horizontal. The coal we find in Pennsylvania, for example, was first buried by other sediments, and then compressed and folded as the Appalachian Mountains were formed. No world-wide flood could create folded seams of coal, much less mountains with folded rock layers.

And if you persist, I have some experiments you can try.

651 Thanos  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 6:52:02am

re: #647 Nat-X

Hippos have legs. Hippos spend a large percent of their time in water. Hippos are in transition as well. Hippos have legs, imagine that.

Ever seen a bull walrus or bull seal walk? Ever heard of dugongs and manatee?


[Link: query.nytimes.com...]

652 quickjustice  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 6:53:07am

re: #646 Zoomie

The short answer to your comments about natural selection is "yes". Genetic differences among individuals within populations mean that they differ physically, often in minor respects. If the external environment changes, some individuals may have better prospects of survival than others. If the climate gets colder, individuals with more fur, and their offspring, may survive better. Over generations, the fur-bearing trait gets "selected", because it helps the species with survival. Evolution makes no other, or theological, claims.

This isn't "tautology". It's observable fact. Darwin wasn't the first scientist to speculate about evolution. He was the one who made the prodigious efforts necessary to observe and report voluminous evidence of evolution. His evidence survived. I saw it displayed at the N.Y. Museum of Natural History a few years ago. It's staggering in its scope and breadth. If you bring no prejudice to the table, it's persuasive.

The problem with bringing theology to the table in this debate is that religious people draw the wrong conclusions from these facts. They erroneously think, first, that evolution denies the existence of G-d. Evolution, properly understood, makes no such claim. But fundamentalists are compelled nonetheless to drag G-d into the discussion.

I understand the following: that healthy religion enables humans to organize themselves socially so that the hungry are fed, and the poor, rendered aid. Healthy religion enables humans to advocate for justice, and to fight for good, and against evil. Healthy religion creates a healthy community in which good people help each other to survive.

And isn't that really, in the end, G-d's will, the "facts" of evolution notwithstanding? Isn't evolution the default position in the absence of human intervention?

653 Daisy  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:20:58am

Bad teachers and cops are about impossible to get rid of - thanks to way too powerful unions.

654 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:22:14am

I just had to drop back into this thread to upding FinnAgain.
Nice work.

655 Charles  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:23:10am

That's enough craziness from 'Kepler Sings'. That comment about "quit using the holocaust" is the last straw for this caveman.

656 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:24:41am

re: #655 Charles

That's enough craziness from 'Kepler Sings'. That comment about "quit using the holocaust" is the last straw for this caveman.

I just KNEW the Jews were to blame for evolution! If not for the Chosen People, I coulda been somebody, I coulda been a contendah trilobite.

657 mama winger  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:34:47am

re: #577 Sharmuta

Kepler- I'll even go so far as to say you're an uber-fundie. Countless theologians would tell you Genesis can, even should, be read as metaphorical.

There are also countless theologians who are Gramscian whores as well. There are even priests and ministers who deny the Deity altogether, and think we should all just be moral people. So this statement carries no weight with me unless I can see the specific argument they are making.

As to Genesis being reduced to a metaphor, how then do you interpret this:

Genesis 12

Promises to Abraham
1 Now the LORD had said to Abraham:

“Get out of your country,
From your family
And from your father’s house,
To a land that I will show you.

2 I will make you a great nation;
I will bless you
And make your name great;
And you shall be a blessing.

3 I will bless those who bless you,
And I will curse him who curses you;
And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”

or this:

Genesis 17
The Sign of the Covenant

1 .... the LORD appeared to Abram and said to him, “I am Almighty God; walk before Me and be blameless.
2 And I will make My covenant between Me and you, and will multiply you exceedingly.”
3 Then Abram fell on his face, and God talked with him, saying:
4 “As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations.
5 No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations.
6 I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you.

7 And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you.

8 Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”

Or the birth of Isaac and then of Jacob, the patriarchs of the Jews.

3 And behold, the LORD stood above it and said [to Jacob]: “I am the LORD God of Abraham your father and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie I will give to you and your descendants. 14 Also your descendants shall be as the dust of the earth; you shall spread abroad to the west and the east, to the north and the south; and in you and in your seed all the families of the earth shall be blessed. 15 Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have spoken to you.”

Are they just metaphors? Are they just morality tales on the level of Aesop's fables?

Real events can have large and broad implications, and still be real events. For instance I am reminded of how Esau sold his birthright (the eternal inheritance from the Lord) for the here and now; for appetites he had that seemed more important to him at the time, W.

658 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:35:32am

re: #655 Charles

That's enough craziness from 'Kepler Sings'. That comment about "quit using the holocaust" is the last straw for this caveman.

no more singing for Kepler, that's a relief!

659 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:40:20am
660 mama winger  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:41:21am

re: #659 buzzsawmonkey

Morning buzz :)

661 Honorary Yooper  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:42:07am

re: #655 Charles

OT, something seems to be slowing the site down this morning. I don't know if it is the connection, or the site, but I don't seem to be having problems with most of the other places I go in the morning.

662 Charles  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:53:13am

re: #661 Honorary Yooper

OT, something seems to be slowing the site down this morning. I don't know if it is the connection, or the site, but I don't seem to be having problems with most of the other places I go in the morning.

Must be somewhere in your network connections -- the servers are running fine.

663 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:00:32am

re: #646 Zoomie

Lots of offspring....So successful natural selection is defined as...it survived to reproduce. If it did not survive and reproduce, it was not successful and was not selected by natural selection.

Do I have that right?

No.
Imagine that the Earth had never seen a polar bear, and I take my EZ Bake oven and whip up a batzh of 40,000 polar bears. Now, they're pretty much the perfectly adapted arctic predator. But the place where I put them happens to get hit by a meteor. Poof, 40,000 polar bears dead, species is wiped out. They were not 'selected against'.

In fact, if two polar bears survive the meteor, and one of them had a homozygous dominant mutation turning its fur black, we would then see all future polar bears as black bears due to something known as the Bottleneck Effect. Again, nobody has been selected.


If, however
, some polar bears had genes that made them better able to survive in their new ecological niche... say, they had speeding meteors bounce off them like pez, and laughed at danger? Then the rest of the polar bears would die and the super bears would breed, creating a shift in allelic frequency in the population.
Just like if we had animals that were from two to three feet tall, and they ate leaves... and all of a sudden all branches less than 2.75 feet suffered a plague and only those who were three feet tall, plus any strange mutants who happened to be taller, would survive. If food then kept getting higher up, we would expect height would continuously be selected for, as it would be a more desirable trait within that population. More the animals to a field with lots of nice small shrubberies?
No selection pressure anymore on that dynamic.

Even in humans there is something called sexual selection as distinct from natural selection.
There are all sorts of selection pressures, and SS tends to bootstrap a species.


Natural selection selects the adaptation that survives and breeds the most. Natural selection knows what to select by selecting the survivors. Except NS can't look backwards. So it waits to see what survived and then selects it?

I don't know you, so I have to ask... were you being serious and trying to figure out evolutionary mechanics? Or are you simply trying to pick holes in a concept and deliberately treating an impersonal force as something that "chooses" or "knows" anything?

re: #647 Nat-X


Is evolution also non-disprovable?

Evolution is a fact. Much like gravity. It would be disproved in a similar manner. You can see for yourself that populations shift in allelic frequency over time. Evolutionary theories are models that attempt to explain/predict facts. Evolution (fact) would be falsified by things no longer having a heritable genetic code.

Models of evolutionary mechanics/history (theory) would be falsified by wildly conflicting evidence. Finding, say, a cro magnon skeleton in a rock strata that was contemporary with the Jurasic era would falsify pretty much every current model.


I would be interested in what caused a population of four-legged land animals to collectively decide, over billions of years, that things are better in the ocean. Presto, legs turn into fins. Or likewise, that a population of sea creatures collectively yearned for the good life up on dry land, and over billions years, they too changed their fins into legs.

Don't tell me "billions and billions of years" caused it.

Okay... I'll point out that populations don't "decide" on any such thing, and that it's a strawman. I"ll point out that if there were advantages to being on water or land, that there would be selection pressures and that small differences would be accentuated over time due to reproductive isolation.

I'd tell you that time on a nearly geological time frame allows the replication, mutation and selection to work on a population, because that's the truth, but that saying time "caused it", is bull.

664 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:03:20am

By the way, thanks folks.
I've been so busy composing debate points and posting them, that I've been remiss and haven't properly thanked people who were king enough to offer compliments.

So again, thanks. Sorry for missing your posts.

665 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:06:29am

re: #664 FinnAgain

You have been the voice of reason on these two posts, with a dramatic display of knowledge and background information.
It's a pleasure reading your well constructed comments!

666 Honorary Yooper  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:10:43am

re: #662 Charles

Must be somewhere in your network connections -- the servers are running fine.

Fair enough. Whatever it was seems to have gone away.

667 J.S.  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:14:07am

Stephen Jay Gould used the phrase "the organism proposes and the environment disposes." (Mutations add alleles to a gene pool, while natural selection removes/weeds out maladaptive alleles..."mutation in, selection out.")

Gould also wrote about the "tautology argument" (p. 236 from "Wonderful Life"). Gould wrote:

"Critics claim that our motto 'survival of the fittest' is a meaningless tautology because fitness is defined by survival, and the definition of natural selection reduces to an empty 'survival of those who survive.'
Creationists have even been known to trot out this argument as a supposed disproof of evolution - as if more than a century of data could come crashing down through a schoolboy error in syllogistic logic. In fact, the supposed problem has an easy resolution, one that Darwin himself recognized and presented. Fitness --in this context, superior adaptation -- cannot be defined after the fact by survival, but must be predictable before the challenge by an analysis of form, physiology, or behavior. As Darwin argued, the deer that should run faster and longer (as indicated by an analysis of bones, joints, and muscles) ought to survive better in a world of dangerous predators. Better survival is a prediction to be tested, not a definition of adaptation."

668 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:21:57am
It not infrequently happens that something about the earth, about the sky, about other elements of this world, about the motion and rotation or even the magnitude and distances of the stars, about definite eclipses of the sun and moon, about the passage of years and seasons, about the nature of animals, of fruits, of stones, and of other such things, may be known with the greatest certainty by reasoning or by experience, even by one who is not a Christian. It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are. In view of this and in keeping it in mind constantly while dealing with the book of Genesis, I have, insofar as I was able, explained in detail and set forth for consideration the meanings of obscure passages, taking care not to affirm rashly some one meaning to the prejudice of another and perhaps better explanation.

Saint Augustine

669 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:43:10am

Slumbering Behemoth

re: #545 six-gun-neo-con

First and foremost, the alleged branding by the teacher

For fuck's sake, he admitted to doing it. Dimwit.

At least he is honest. Stupid move on his part, but, I have to say the cross looks a lot better than the myriads of black ink tattoos, tongue and nose piercings kids get these days.

670 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:45:15am

*correction*

The gratuitous profanity above is credited to the Slumbering Bohemeth

re: #545 six-gun-neo-con

First and foremost, the alleged branding by the teacher

For fuck's sake, he admitted to doing it. Dimwit.

671 NY Nana  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:46:19am

re: #612 2by2

You are most welcome! And Kepler is gone!

672 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:47:54am

re: #664 FinnAgain

people who were king enough

Kind, kind!
Yeeesh, and I previewed.

Obviously being up half the night with a crohn's flareup is not conducive to meticulous, typo-free posting in the morning.
It's naptime for bonzo.

Someone please pounce upon and then smack around an evolution-is-just-a-theory bot for me while I'm gone. Ya know... rhetorically.

673 NY Nana  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:50:49am

re: #655 Charles

That comment about "quit using the holocaust" is the last straw for this caveman.

Thank you so much, Charles. A caveman you ain't.

That comment hurt so much re the Holocaust. I wonder if he even knew what it was.

His gratuitous gobbledegook was way OTT...he didn't trace to a university, did he?

674 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:55:15am
675 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:57:22am

re: #671 NY Nana

Hi Nana,
yep Kepler vanished in a green flash.

676 mama winger  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:00:06am

re: #668 Sharmuta

Saint Augustine's teachings on the Book of Genesis: "The Confessions of St Augustine, book 12"

It is true, that not only every created, and formed thing, but also whatever is capable of creation and of form, You have made, by whom are all things. - St Augustine

677 EvilConservative  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:07:45am

I wonder at what point the media is going to actually tell the rest of the story? The fact is Mr Freshwater was voted Teacher of the Year last year by the School Board. I find it interesting that the school board would give any teacher this type of award if they were aware of ANY improper conduct. Sounds to me like this may be a witchhunt.

678 NY Nana  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:18:22am

re: #675 2by2

Hi Nana,
yep Kepler vanished in a green flash.

Hmmm, I could have sworn I smelled sulfur!

679 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:19:16am

re: #677 EvilConservative

please read the thread, before you make statements like that, Charles and others have linked exhaustively to all relevant sources, including the one which talks about the 11 years of constant complaints against the 'Teacher of the Year'.

680 Ma Sands  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:20:32am

re: #577 Shar

Countless theologians would tell you


Shar.....it is good to listen to them, to hear what God might have for you --howsomever, in order to be sure you're not being mislead, you need to have a closer-than-this-life connection to the One who actually did give us the words.... :)

love ya

681 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:22:57am

re: #678 NY Nana

Sulfur and Tar, smelled a little like the weekend BBQ's on 95th and the Westside HWY

682 NY Nana  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:33:05am

re: #681 2by2

Sulfur and Tar, smelled a little like the weekend BBQ's on 95th and the Westside HWY

I can believe it! Are you a New Yawker, too? I left my email blue.

683 2by2  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:44:27am

re: #682 NY Nana

Yep a Noo Yawker, by choice though, mail's in cyberspace, check your account, please.

684 Salamantis  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:52:12am

I try to make this point on every one of these evolution vs. creation threads.

The proof for divergent evolution via mutation and natural selection from common ancestors is found in our genes, in the artifactual retroviral sequences embedded in our DNA that we share with genetically closely related species:

[Link: [Link: www.newyorker.com...]...]

Here is a quote, but read the whole thing.

“If Charles Darwin reappeared today, he might be surprised to learn that humans are descended from viruses as well as from apes,” Weiss wrote.

Darwin’s surprise almost certainly would be mixed with delight: when he suggested, in “The Descent of Man” (1871), that humans and apes shared a common ancestor, it was a revolutionary idea, and it remains one today. Yet nothing provides more convincing evidence for the “theory” of evolution than the viruses contained within our DNA. Until recently, the earliest available information about the history and the course of human diseases, like smallpox and typhus, came from mummies no more than four thousand years old. Evolution cannot be measured in a time span that short. Endogenous retroviruses provide a trail of molecular bread crumbs leading millions of years into the past.

Darwin’s theory makes sense, though, only if humans share most of those viral fragments with relatives like chimpanzees and monkeys. And we do, in thousands of places throughout our genome. If that were a coincidence, humans and chimpanzees would have had to endure an incalculable number of identical viral infections in the course of millions of years, and then, somehow, those infections would have had to end up in exactly the same place within each genome. The rungs of the ladder of human DNA consist of three billion pairs of nucleotides spread across forty-six chromosomes. The sequences of those nucleotides determine how each person differs from another, and from all other living things. The only way that humans, in thousands of seemingly random locations, could possess the exact retroviral DNA found in another species is by inheriting it from a common ancestor.

Molecular biology has made precise knowledge about the nature of that inheritance possible. With extensive databases of genetic sequences, reconstructing ancestral genomes has become common, and retroviruses have been found in the genome of every vertebrate species that has been studied. Anthropologists and biologists have used them to investigate not only the lineage of primates but the relationships among animals—dogs, jackals, wolves, and foxes, for example—and also to test whether similar organisms may in fact be unrelated.

685 theatheistjew  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:14:44am

re: #677 EvilConservative

I wonder at what point the media is going to actually tell the rest of the story? The fact is Mr Freshwater was voted Teacher of the Year last year by the School Board. I find it interesting that the school board would give any teacher this type of award if they were aware of ANY improper conduct. Sounds to me like this may be a witchhunt.


Don't let the facts stand in your way though.
If he was teaching that he knows horses can ascend to heaven because it is written in the Koran, I'm sure you wouldn't be defending him.

686 NY Nana  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:23:07am

re: #683 2by2

Now you check your email! ;)

687 funky chicken  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:38:07am

re: #677 EvilConservative

I wonder at what point the media is going to actually tell the rest of the story? The fact is Mr Freshwater was voted Teacher of the Year last year by the School Board. I find it interesting that the school board would give any teacher this type of award if they were aware of ANY improper conduct. Sounds to me like this may be a witchhunt.

Creationists have worked very, very hard to win elections to school boards all across the country. It is one thing that lost the KS governor's mansion to a democrat for the first time in decades. It took 15-20 years or so, but the fact that the local GOP apparatus was totally taken over by fundamentalists finally pissed off enough KS voters....

688 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:47:37am

Salamantis says
“If Charles Darwin reappeared today, he might be surprised to learn that humans are descended from viruses as well as from apes,” Weiss wrote.

*********

Descended from apes and viruses. HAHAHAHHAHA!

What a joke!

689 Charles  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:56:51am

Good grief.

690 Hanoch  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:59:03am

If a science teacher wants explain the theory of intelligent design as a possible cause for the universe, there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is explained as theory. Likewise, if a science teacher wants explain the theory of evolution (which, of course, is not a theory explaining the original cause of the universe or anything in it), there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is explained as theory.

Reading the various panicked posts connected with this story (which is really not all that significant), its hard not to get the sense that the real fanatics are the evolution faithful. Calm down, folks.

691 Charles  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 11:04:26am

re: #690 Hanoch

If a science teacher wants explain the theory of intelligent design as a possible cause for the universe, there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is explained as theory. Likewise, if a science teacher wants explain the theory of evolution (which, of course, is not a theory explaining the original cause of the universe or anything in it), there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is explained as theory.

Reading the various panicked posts connected with this story (which is really not all that significant), its hard not to get the sense that the real fanatics are the evolution faithful. Calm down, folks.

The problem is that one of these things (the theory of evolution) is a scientific theory, and the other ("intelligent design") is a religious agenda being pushed into science classes where it does not belong.

692 gunjam  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 11:17:40am

re: #93 DeathtotheSwiss


I think you have confused religion with science.

No, Ma'am! Not I.

I recognize -- and have already said so on this thread -- that I believe that acceptance of EITHER THEORY (creation or evolution) is religious in nature.

In fact, I have to chuckle at the fanatical outpouring of evolutionary religious fervor that I encounter on lgf threads covering the topic of evolution.

The ultra-religious have nothing on some lizards when it comes to all out zeal.

... and (in my view) misguided zeal, at that.

Yet, I remain a kaffir when it comes to drinking the evolutionary kool-aid.

But I do doff my hat in recognizing that the collective IQ on this thread is off the charts.

(Note to self: How could so many folks with so much intellectual firepower be....so WRONG?)

693 gunjam  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 11:22:57am

re: #685 theatheistjew

Don't let the facts stand in your way though.
If he was teaching that he knows horses can ascend to heaven because it is written in the Koran, I'm sure you wouldn't be defending him.

Excellent straw man!

694 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 11:32:59am

One of the pillars of this great country is Freedom of Religion. However, with the "Theory" of Evolution mandated as a part of the science curriculum as required to be taught in public schools, clashes with Christian teaching. Parents who can afford to do so, have taken thier children out of Public schools and have entered them into private schools. These parents see the forcing of that "Theory" in science classes by the public schools as an attempt to undermine the faith the Constitution gives them the right to practice.

In my opinion there is plenty of science that can be taught in the public class room without trying to force a "Theory" on children seen by the parents of those children as an attempt by athiests to undermine their faith.

695 Hanoch  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 11:54:20am

re: #691 Charles

I appreciate your concerns. I am not at all in favor of teaching religion in public schools.

My problem, however, is that science does not develop by stifling theories--however far-fetched they may seem at the time--out of fear of where they may lead. There is a legitimate scientific question as to the origin of the universe. One of the possibilities is ID. I am sure there are others. My view is students should not be shielded from any of them. They can make their own decisions. This has nothing to do with Bible study; it is a question of looking at the empirical evidence--whatever it may be--that supports or detracts from any theory of the origin of the universe. I think one of the worst things that can be done in the area of science is to constrain the imagination. Historically, it seems those efforts came primarily from the religious world, but today, it seems like the pendulum has reversed itself.

I'll give you a hypothetical example of my concerns. As I have posted before, the "steady state" theory of the universe (i.e., that it had no starting point) used to be accepted as gospel by the scientific community. There were those who disagreed, believing it had a starting point (which would obviously be consistent with the Bible's basic narrative). Scientific research seems to have borne out the latter view (i.e., the "big bang" theory is now widely accepted). But what would have happened if the steady state proponents insisted that their scientific adversaries were merely trying to push a religious agenda, and were successful in precluding the research which led to acceptance of the big bang theory? I don't think science would be better off today.

If a teacher discusses ID as a veiled attempt to teach religion, I agree with you. However, if a teacher is positing ID theory as a possible answer to a legitimate scientific question, and that teacher has insight on ID from a scientific perspective, I see nothing wrong with that.

696 gman  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 12:13:48pm

I want scientists to continue to use the scientific method, otherwise it is not science. I want science teachers to teach my children science based on the scientific method, otherwise they are not science teachers.

The theory that God created the world in the span of a week is not testable by the scientific method so it doesn't belong in a science class.

Unless someone here can come up with a way to test the 6 day theory, then I will continue to use faith to guide my belief system with regards to God being the creator of all things.

The only reason I can think of why a person would feel threatened by a theory based on the scientific method is if they were told it was not a valid method by someone else and did not investigate its merits themselves. Almost all of the tangible things we have were arrived at by observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and drawing conclusions. Does anyone think God would disapprove of this method of finding out about the world around us? What if the same method scientists use to find out how the human body works was used to determine how the world came to be? That is precisely what has happened. Do you think God would say we shouldn't use the scientific method to see how the world was made or would that line of inquiry be off limits?

God loves for us for what lies in our hearts, which is the fountain from which our actions flow. We believe in God not because of the scientific method, but because of our belief in something greater than ourselves.

697 Charles  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:18:29pm

re: #695 Hanoch

The problem, again, is that there is no such thing as "ID theory." If teachers tell their students about ID in a science class, they are teaching their students religion, not science -- and the type of religion they're teaching is a deceptive agenda promoted mainly by organizations like the Discovery Institute.

"Intelligent design" is not a scientific theory, it's a political agenda.

698 Nemesis6  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:31:01pm

re: #692 gunjam

Belief in science is not belief in the supernatural, because science does not deal with the supernatural, which is the reason why it does not deal with Creationism/Intelligent Design, and why neither of those two are allowed in science classrooms.

Checkmate?

699 Honorary Yooper  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:36:35pm

re: #694 six-gun-neo-con

Um, science is as much a religion as math or history. It is people like yourself who insist in ramming your religious ideas down our throats. It is yet another young earth creationist (YEC) fallacy to equate science with religion. You folks do this so that you can look justified in wedging in your religious ideas and having them promoted by the government in a flagrant violation of the Constitution, Amendment 1.

Not all of us Christians want you forcing your beliefs down our throats and indoctrinating our children with what is considered to be a hersey by some of us. Biblical literalism is only supported by a very few groups, and not supported by the majority of Christians.

So please, evolve your ideas and learn something for a change.

700 George guy  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:42:56pm

re: #645 Zoomie

So in your case of the deer population...

Parents have offspring with variant traits, in this example an enzyme variation.
Natural selection selects the fittest offspring.
There is no such thing as a good or bad variant. A successful variant is defined as the ones that survive.


What I am describing is a variant that may not be sufficiently less successful to be eliminated by natural selection, and suggesting that this type of variation may happen frequently enough to accumulate over time.
Natural selection is a convenient description of what happens when part of a population survives any of a multitude of possible natural threats. It does not, and cannot operate with 100% accuracy.
It is not necessarily just the fittest that survive, but any that are fit enough to survive the threat. That may frequently include those that are slightly below average in some respect.



The fittest are those that survive and produce. They may or may not be the fattest or thinnest.
The unfit do not survive and produce in sufficient quantity.

Natural selection selects the descendants that survive.
Natural selection does not select the descendants that do not survive.

I do not think this can be falsified. It is true by definition.

Again, the phrase 'natural selection' is merely a convenient description for what happens when part of a population survives any of numerous possible natural threats. It is observably true that this happens. It is not necessarily observably true that the surviving population is preserved from accumulating the kind of genetic variations that, over many generations, would result in an organism somewhat less fit for its environment than its ancestor.

701 J.S.  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:49:41pm

re: #695 Hanoch

Sooo, do you realize why the Steady State theory was rejected? Do you think it was rejected because the Steady State conflicts with biblical teachings?

Here's a note from the textbook, "Universe" by Kaufmann (4th edition, page 551). The author writes: "...the steady-state model of the universe [was] proposed in 1948 by Herman Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle. In this model it was proposed that, as the galaxies move further away from each other, new galaxies are formed in between out of matter that is being 'constantly created.' The universe would therefore look more or less the same at all times and the density would be roughly constant. This model had the great virtue that it made definite predictions that could be tested by observations. Unfortunately, observations of radio sources by Martin Ryle and his collaborators at Cambridge in the 1950s and early 1960s showed that the number of radio sources must have been greater in the past, contradicting the steady-state model. The final nail in the coffin of the steady-state theory was the discovery of microwave background radiation in 1965. There was no way this radiation could be accounted for in the model."

So, who's being dogmatic? Whose ideas are being overturned and re-formulated in light of new evidence? It's the ideas of scientists -- based on observations and empirical analyses..(Also, for the nth time, Darwinian theory does not examine the "origins of the universe" -- that's the role of scientific cosmology.)

702 Charles  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:49:48pm

re: #700 George guy

This sounds like a slight variation on the "Haldane's Dilemma" fallacy:

[Link: www.talkorigins.org...]

703 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:52:15pm

Honorary Yooper

Evolution is not been proven by sceientific observation or scientific experientation, so evolution is not science. The geological record does not show any species that were transition species to mankind. None. Quite to the contrary, scientists have debunked all so called fossils of transition species.

The fossilology records show new species appeared suddenly. Now THAT is creationism.

Robert L. Whitlaw, professor of nuclear engineering in the Virginia Polytechnic Institute, “With solid facts gathered from many quarters, the theory of evolution is weighed in the balance and found wanting, both in science and logic.”

704 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 2:55:00pm

*error* not been proven by sceientific
*corrected* has not been proven by scientific

705 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:29:00pm

re: #694 six-gun-neo-con

I think you grossly exaggerate the reasoning for parents putting their children into private schools. Most of the parents I know whose children are in private schools didn't make that decision in any way, shape or form having anything to do with evolution and everything to do with the fact that private schools do a better job at educating students. Not only that, but private schools such as Catholic schools teach *gasp* evolution! There are a myriad of reasons parents are opting out of public schools- to claim it's solely due to the teaching of evolution is absurd.

706 reine.de.tout  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:34:00pm

re: #694 six-gun-neo-con

One of the pillars of this great country is Freedom of Religion. However, with the "Theory" of Evolution mandated as a part of the science curriculum as required to be taught in public schools, clashes with Christian teaching. Parents who can afford to do so, have taken thier children out of Public schools and have entered them into private schools. These parents see the forcing of that "Theory" in science classes by the public schools as an attempt to undermine the faith the Constitution gives them the right to practice.

In my opinion there is plenty of science that can be taught in the public class room without trying to force a "Theory" on children seen by the parents of those children as an attempt by athiests to undermine their faith.

My daughter attends a Catholic High School. She takes a religion class, which is about our faith.

She also takes science classes, which are science. Creationism/Intelligent Design are not taught.

She is in a Catholic school because she gets a better education than she could get in a public school here. That "better" education includes instruction in science as science, and then separately, religion as religion.

707 zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:36:01pm

re: #652 quickjustice

If the climate gets colder, individuals with more fur, and their offspring, may survive better. Over generations, the fur-bearing trait gets "selected", because it helps the species with survival.

Animals adapted to cold climates: Fury polar bears, whales with hides or skins, fish with scales, birds with feathers.....

Are you saying there is a force called natural selection that can measure speed, color, or strength? And this force called 'natural selection' selects the highest quality traits? When we speak in the passive voice -- ' gets selected' -- it masks the fact that nothing is doing the selecting even though evolutionists have borrowed a term that might be used by a designer, a god with little g (or Big G for that matter). That is, something that has a will selects.

So...
-Parents have offspring with variant traits.
-Natural selection selects the fittest offspring. We declare them fittest because they survived. Likewise, the unfit die off.
-NS is not a physical force or energy or even a biological process (not a potion of organic chemistry).

Natural selection selects the descendants that survive.
Natural selection does not select the descendants that do not survive.

Here is absolute truth per current theory of E:
If an organism exists today it was by definition naturally selected
If an organism does not exist (the line died out...) it was by definition not selected.

(Some on this board are thinking I am about to be naturally Unselected)

Sorry I can't get excited about that as a comprehensive explanation.

708 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:37:51pm

re: #706 reine.de.tout

I know a family with three boys in a Catholic school- the 6 year old just finished kindergarten and is already reading and writing and after one year in a private school- he is already ahead of his public school peers.

THAT is why parents send their kids to private schools.

709 reine.de.tout  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 3:58:59pm

re: #708 Sharmuta

I know a family with three boys in a Catholic school- the 6 year old just finished kindergarten and is already reading and writing and after one year in a private school- he is already ahead of his public school peers.

THAT is why parents send their kids to private schools.



Yes it is. And my daughter's elementary school had 30 kids in a class - not at all PC these days to have large classes. But they were well disciplined, order was maintained, and the kids are at least one or two years of public school grades.

710 George guy  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:10:18pm

re: #702 Charles

I'm afraid it would take a considerable leap to get from Haldane to what I've been talking about. I haven't been discussing the "cost of natural selection" per se, I haven't been using that to make any assertions about the time frame, and Mark Isaak in this exceedingly relevant article is mainly concerned with the point of correcting Haldane and ReMine's assertions about how quickly genes may become fixated in order to assert his point that ten million years would have been enough time to genetically separate humans and apes to the extent that they are.

What I was talking about, on the other hand, concerns the question of whether the various processes collectively described as natural selection are in fact selective enough to exclude enough of the kind of variations that would be disadvantageous to a particular species' survival over the course of numerous generations, and I recognized that it's a question that can't be properly answered without a rather expensive experiment that is unlikely to be financed by the likes of us.

711 zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:15:59pm

re: #700 George guy

Again, the phrase 'natural selection' is merely a convenient description for what happens when part of a population survives any of numerous possible natural threats. It is observably true that this happens. It is not necessarily observably true that the surviving population is preserved from accumulating the kind of genetic variations that, over many generations, would result in an organism somewhat less fit for its environment than its ancestor.

Agree...

If an organism exists today it was by definition naturally selected
If an organism does not exist (the line died out...) it was by definition not selected.

And I think it is a weak concept to describe the development of the multi TRILLION celled animals. It is a mechanism that is not a mechanism or force but a catch phrase to describe what is thought to be an outcome.

712 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:18:50pm

re: #709 reine.de.tout

I would think any parent who cares enough about their child's education to the extent they'll put them in private school would want that same child taught science- real science- in such a way as to not hinder that child's ability to understand and pursue science (if they so choose) at a collegiate level.

Also- "classroom size" is just another gimmick for the public schools to milk more money out of the tax payers.

713 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:19:38pm

Sharmuta says...
the 6 year old just finished kindergarten and is already reading and writing and after one year in a private school

So the public school system that promotes teaching evolution in science (folks ancesters were unintelligent, knuckle dragging animals-monkeys) is a flop. Old news.

reine.de.tout
There are numerous Christian private schools that do teach science as being the established laws the universe that God created. Either case, children are taught that they are not animals and are a higher form of God's creation, that they were indeed were created in His image and Likeness and not that they evolved from an ape, the ape being a part of the world that God created Mankind to have dominion over.

Does give the children a much higher regard for themselves and a sense of repsonibility for all other forms of life on earth, such as the Apes that still haven't quite yet made that incredible leap into being guys and gals, or frogs, or dogs. Monkeys, dogs, frogs, each distinct and seperate species that don't evolve into other species. Monkeys, dogs, frogs have always been seperate species (look at the ancient fossil records) and always will be.

Now THAT is scientific!

714 Salamantis  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:20:45pm

re: #688 six-gun-neo-con

A ridiculous nonresponse. You have not in the least addressed the incontrovertible fact of multitudes of artifactual retroviral sequences found in precisely isomorphic locations in human and primate DNA, and how to explain this other than by inheritance from common ancestors. And indeed, it is statistically incredible that such massive retroviral sequence isomorphism could have occurred serendipitously; which is why you did not address it; that such retroviral sequential artifectual isomorphism is, and can only be, the result of such inheritance from common ancestors is, quite simply, irrefutable. It is your groundless denial of this fact that is ludicrous and laughable, and indicative of willful ignorance.

715 Salamantis  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:24:46pm

I must add one word to my previous post:

re: #688 six-gun-neo-con

A ridiculous nonresponse. You have not in the least addressed the incontrovertible fact of multitudes of IDENTICAL artifactual retroviral sequences found in precisely isomorphic locations in human and primate DNA, and how to explain this other than by inheritance from common ancestors. And indeed, it is statistically incredible that such massive retroviral sequence isomorphism could have occurred serendipitously; which is why you did not address it; that such retroviral sequential artifectual isomorphism is, and can only be, the result of such inheritance from common ancestors is, quite simply, irrefutable. It is your groundless denial of this fact that is ludicrous and laughable, and indicative of willful ignorance.

716 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:35:42pm

re: #713 six-gun-neo-con

Does give the children a much higher regard for themselves

LOL- isn't that what the critics of the public schools say? That they have become nothing more that centers to promote self-esteem?

Here's a clue- not being ignorant can give one a much higher sense of themself. Do you like feeling stupid? Here's another clue- few people do, although some clearly revel in their ignorance.

717 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:42:15pm

Salamantis

There is no comparison of Ape DNA to Human DNA. There are numerous and different Ape DNA such as the Mountain Gorilla, Suma Tran, Orangatang, etc. Each have sequences of deep branches within their DNA. Very different from the small cluster of short branches in humans. Comparing Ape DNA to human DNA is like comparing human DNA to horse DNA.

718 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:45:34pm

re: #703 six-gun-neo-con


Evolution is not been proven by sceientific observation or scientific experientation, so evolution is not science.

Explain. Endogenous. Retroviruses.


The fossilology records show new species appeared suddenly.

Hit 'control-F', search for "bull", "whale" or "snake".
Hint: your talking point has already been debunked.


Robert L. Whitlaw, professor of nuclear engineering in the Virginia Polytechnic Institute,

Well damn, if a nuclear engineer says that biological sciences are wrong, then obviously he's right. I mean, who knows more about biology than a nuclear engineer?

re: #707 zoomie


Are you saying there is a force called natural selection that can measure speed, color, or strength?

Nope. Nobody is saying that. How you even got that is bizarre.

Imagine you have a doorway that is four feet tall. Only those people who are shorter than four feet can get through it. A bunch of people from 3-6 feet want to get through it. Those who can are selected by the height of the door. And lo and behold, the door is not a magic Creator with a will who actively chooses anything.

Your gloss is rather extremely absurd, don't you think? Does it really take a magic Creator willful force to say that the water is cold, and those parents who have more genes for blubber and fast swimming will have children who are better at surviving the cold and catching fish? That those children, in turn, will have a better chance at surviving longer and catching more fish than others, and will pass on their genes?
That you routinely come up with the most outlandish interpretation that treats these facts as if someone was talking about a religion shows one of two things: scientists can't get away from religious reasoning... or you can't.


Natural selection selects the descendants that survive.
Natural selection does not select the descendants that do not survive.

As has been explained to you, several times, selection pressures create an advantage (like the four foot doorway) for some. Success is measured by breeding, not ultimate survival. And those who less fully conform to a selection pressure can still breed, just like people who are 3'11" can get through the door even though people who are 3'0" will have an easier time of it.


If an organism exists today it was by definition naturally selected
If an organism does not exist (the line died out...) it was by definition not selected.

It has already been described that, for instance, natural events can wipe an entire population out without them being selected against.
It has already been pointed out that those organisms which exist are evolutionary relative successes, and it's fully possible for other species or individuals within the same species to better meet selection pressures. One could also point out that selection pressures are most active on young, breeding age indivduals.

Once they age, defects creep in that can not be selected against, because there is no longer any selection pressure on them (they do not breed, survival is NOT fitness.).
Which, of course, is why aging in humans brings with it many, many unavoidable health concerns while it is very rare for young, healthy teenagers to suffer from anything worse than acne.


(Some on this board are thinking I am about to be naturally Unselected)

Selection on our ancestors was such that those who could read, communicate and use language properly had a massive survival advantage, preserved even now in that I could write a book that explain how you can survive in the jungle, and you never have had to set foot in the jungle, previously, to make use of my knowledge. I could even have lived 800 years ago and my words may still be true and useful.

Your inability to use language properly just shows that the selection pressure wasn't strong enough.

719 gman  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:47:08pm

re: #713 six-gun-neo-con

Sharmuta says...
the 6 year old just finished kindergarten and is already reading and writing and after one year in a private school

So the public school system that promotes teaching evolution in science (folks ancesters were unintelligent, knuckle dragging animals-monkeys) is a flop. Old news.

reine.de.tout
There are numerous Christian private schools that do teach science as being the established laws the universe that God created. Either case, children are taught that they are not animals and are a higher form of God's creation, that they were indeed were created in His image and Likeness and not that they evolved from an ape, the ape being a part of the world that God created Mankind to have dominion over.

Does give the children a much higher regard for themselves and a sense of repsonibility for all other forms of life on earth, such as the Apes that still haven't quite yet made that incredible leap into being guys and gals, or frogs, or dogs. Monkeys, dogs, frogs, each distinct and seperate species that don't evolve into other species. Monkeys, dogs, frogs have always been seperate species (look at the ancient fossil records) and always will be.

Now THAT is scientific!

I hope scientists continue to observe and experiment without fear of hurting someone's self- esteem. Wait, we don't have to worry. It's not one of the steps in the scientific method.

720 gman  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:54:12pm

re: #717 six-gun-neo-con

Salamantis

There is no comparison of Ape DNA to Human DNA. There are numerous and different Ape DNA such as the Mountain Gorilla, Suma Tran, Orangatang, etc. Each have sequences of deep branches within their DNA. Very different from the small cluster of short branches in humans. Comparing Ape DNA to human DNA is like comparing human DNA to horse DNA.

a comparison of chimp DNA and human DNA was done in 2005 and what do you know? approx. 99% similarity

Do I have less faith in God because of the comparison?
No

721 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:58:08pm

I, however, have less faith in some of humanity.
Odd how that works...

722 Zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 4:59:11pm

re: #667 J.S.

Gould also wrote about the "tautology argument" (p. 236 from "Wonderful Life"). Gould wrote:

"Critics claim that our motto 'survival of the fittest' is a meaningless tautology because fitness is defined by survival, and the definition of natural selection reduces to an empty 'survival of those who survive.'
Creationists have even been known to trot out this argument as a supposed disproof of evolution - as if more than a century of data could come crashing down through a schoolboy error in syllogistic logic. In fact, the supposed problem has an easy resolution, one that Darwin himself recognized and presented. Fitness --in this context, superior adaptation -- cannot be defined after the fact by survival, but must be predictable before the challenge by an analysis of form, physiology, or behavior. As Darwin argued, the deer that should run faster and longer (as indicated by an analysis of bones, joints, and muscles) ought to survive better in a world of dangerous predators. Better survival is a prediction to be tested, not a definition of adaptation."

Fitness....must be predictable before the challenge by the analysis of form, physiology, or behavior.

What? Who is doing the predicting? Are the deer running odds on each other? This is getting so slippery.

Go here if you want a weak defense against the tautological argument and of course here you will also learn that...

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA500.html

""Survival of the fittest" is a poor way to think about evolution. Darwin himself did not use the phrase in the first edition of Origin of Species. .."

AND
"The fittest, to Darwin, were not those which survived, but those which could be expected to survive on the basis of their traits. For example, wild dogs selectively prey on impalas which are weaker according to bone marrow index (Pole et al. 2003). With that definition, survival of the fittest is not a tautology. Similarly, survival can be defined not in terms of the individual's life span, but in terms of leaving a relatively large contribution to the next generation. Defined thus, survival of the fittest becomes more or less what Darwin said, and is not a tautology. "

So IF you DEFINE IT JUST RIGHT (be very, very careful) then 'survival of the fitest becomes more or less what Darwin said, not a tautolgy'

...more or LESS

723 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:09:57pm

re: #722 Zoomie

"Survival of the fittest" wasn't coined by Darwin- it was coined before Origins of Species by Herbert Spencer.

724 Zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:15:31pm

re: #723 Sharmuta

Thanks Sharmuta...history is often very interesting

725 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:17:33pm
726 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:26:03pm

re: #724 Zoomie

It's amazing what one can learn if one is not afraid to go looking for the answers.

727 quickjustice  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:31:31pm

re: #707 zoomie

You're harping on your "tautology" argument. Others have responded in a sophisticated and knowledgeable way to your earlier comments about "tautology", and I won't repeat their points here.

You're wrong to assume that some "intellect", "force" or "power" is making natural selections external to the process itself. If you're attempting to put G-d inside the process, that's a theological error. It's like saying, "G-d struck that man down with lightning, and intended his death". To paraphrase Jesus, "It is error to say G-d caused that piece of masonry to fall off that house and kill that man. G-d does not concern Himself with such matters. Such things happen in the natural world."

As others already have pointed out on this thread, natural selection to improve the chances of a species' survival in a changing environment is only one way selection operates. There's also sexual selection, for example. And among humans, picking a "good" mate has a lot to do with whether children survive. So I'd argue that human culture (which includes the various religions), good or bad, can impact how well humans survive, and how well they evolve. That's something that can be observed or measured.

There is a place for ethics within science. And there is a reasonable basis for debating whether certain scientific inquiries are ethical or not. The propriety of embryonic stem cell research has been one such debate. The Nazis performed horrific human experimentation in pursuit of an evil science that violated all ethical norms.

But arguing over whether G-d is omnipotent in the natural world, and micromanages every event, is pointless from a scientific standpoint. Science measures and observes natural phenomena. It attempts inductive reasoning from the data. And its hypotheses and theories sometimes are disproved with later, better evidence.

"I was wrong", in science, is evidence of humility. Why do we so seldom see humility in debates about religion?

728 swamprat  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 5:51:20pm

re: #583 Kepler Sings
I must correct myself here. Your assertion is true;


. I think I remember God himself wanted at one time to kill all the Jews but Moses, is that a part of my Bible or yours?


9 And again the Lord said to Moses: I see that this people is stiffnecked: 10 Let me alone, that my wrath may be kindled against them, and that I may destroy them, and I will make of thee a great nation. 11 But Moses besought the Lord his God, saying: Why, O Lord, is thy indignation enkindled against thy people, whom thou hast brought out of the land of Egypt, with great power, and with a mighty hand?


But on most other matters you are lacking. Jesus was killed for a number of reasons; Hate wasn't one I saw. People were afraid Rome would clamp down if the people saw Him as a ruler. The priest class didn't want their power or money sources removed. The Governor and "king" of Jerusalem didn't want Rome to think they were losing control....lots of agendas here; hate would hardly be able to get a word in edge-wise. If you see this, pick the book up and read it. End to end. The middle is quite depressing, there are many atrocities that are glossed over. If you study other sources some of them can be sort of understood. The battle of Jericho is rather harsh. What David did to Bosrah is .....difficult. But a thread seems to gather and it is in full strength at the "end". You need to do this on your own, but with other sources as you go. You have been listening to what other people tell you is "in there". You need to find out for yourself. It is not an easy path. You will actually learn things that "others" have not told you. Good luck!

729 J.S.  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 6:49:31pm

re: #722 Zoomie

Are you deliberately trying to be obtuse? No modern biologist (geneticist, etc) uses the phrase "survival of the fittest" -- whenever I hear the phrase, I am thinking...hmmm..."it's probably a creationist using the phrase in an attempt to refute Darwin's theory of evolution." The problems with this peculiar phrase (of Herbert Spencer's) have been gone over and over and over again (here on this thread and elsewhere). Dawkins devoted an entire chapter on the term "fittest." If you are attempting to equate "fitness" with "superiority" of an organism, then you are back to the nineteenth century. It does not mean "superiority"; it does not mean "sophistication"; it does not mean "progress." Nor does "Fitness" refer to "survival" -- you can have an infertile organism (that's a sterile organism --not reproducing or introducing its genetic material into the world) and this infertile critter can "survive" into old age/death --yet, due to its infertility, it is NOT "fit" in a Darwinian sense. Beyond this, I can't figure out what "bug is in your bonnet" so to speak...

730 Nat-X  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:03:53pm

re: #651 Thanos

Hippos have legs. Hippos spend a large percent of their time in water. Hippos are in transition as well. Hippos have legs, imagine that.

Ever seen a bull walrus or bull seal walk? Ever heard of dugongs and manatee?


[Link: query.nytimes.com...]

Why the sarcasm, douche bag? Ducks spend alot of time in water, too. Are they transitional? Still didn't answer my question. These whale-wannabe-hippos still have to collectively, not individually, mutate. What causes that?

731 Zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:04:02pm

re: #727 quickjustice

Quickjustice, you keep bring up religion. I was just focusing on evolution and pointing out that occasionally evolutionist seem to endow natural selection with properties like a physical energy or personality. I understand they don't believe that.

I completely understand that E postulates:
-Parents have offspring.
-The fittest survive by a mechanism called natural selection.
-It is not really a specific mechanism but the net result of thousands of random forces acting on the the offspring.
- The fittest are said to be the fittest if they survive.
- The unfit are said to be those that do not survive (species).
- Except that Darwin did not put it quite that way and heritable traits are supposed to have predictive powers and who knows what that means.
- This non-force and non-specific mechanism is deemed to produce the eye, the whale, the sonar radar structures etc.

I also know 'natural' is used because it intended to mean gradual, random, unguided, accidental, without design. It is specifically meant to exclude supernatural guidance or design, and theistic evolution clap-trap (as seen by the hard core materialist). A perfectly legitimate world view as theories go. But as a world view I think it is wrong.

Classic evolution requires that all that exists comes from material random forces and there is no actual moral law, no justice, no truth. But I claim my God given rights to life, liberty and property. They exist, in reality, and are revealed by revelation, a parallel path with the reason. So it is essential to learn about the material world, and reason and Natural Law. It is also essential to study Revelation and Spiritual Law.

Look I gotta get back to debunking global warming, fighting to keep my property from confiscatory taxation, and whacking on sharia law that is intent on imposing false religion on the the folks with hollow chests in the West.

Oh and I totally agree with your description of healthy religion and 'taking care of the widow and orphans' as James the follower of Jesus advocated.

732 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:24:24pm

re: #731 Zoomie

So it is essential to learn about the material world, and reason and Natural Law. It is also essential to study Revelation and Spiritual Law.

The issue is if studying "Revelation and Spiritual Law" belongs in the science classroom.

733 J.S.  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:47:11pm

re: #731 Zoomie

"The fittest are said to be the fittest if they survive." WRONG.
"I also know 'natural' is used because it intended to mean gradual, random, unguided, accidental, without design." WRONG.

OooKay...now we all know that you do not understand Darwin's Theory of Evolution. Repeat after me (10 times): "Natural selection is the nonrandom reproduction of genotypes, some being favored over others in the particular environments in which they occur." "Natural selection is the nonrandom reproduction of genotypes, some being favored over others in the particular environments in which they occur." Repeat. "Natural selection is the nonrandom..."

Also, from the text, "Biology of Plants" (Raven, Evert, Eichhorn, page 168), the authors write: "Natural selection is the process by which organisms with more favorable characteristics with respect to their environment leave more surviving progeny. Natural selection occurs because of genetically determined variations in natural populations. It takes place as organisms progressively occupy different kinds of habitats. Reproductive success (fitness) can be determined only in relation to the habitat in which a particular population occurs. The base line for the genetics of populations is the Hardy-Weinberg law...Four principle factors that can cause changes in the proportions of alleles and deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (necessary for evolution to occur) are population size, migration, mutation, and selection. Of these selection is the most consequential. It is defined as the nonrandom reproduction of genotypes, some being favored over others in the particular environments in which they occur ..." see above, repeat...

734 Nat-X  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 7:53:38pm

re: #663 FinnAgain

Models of evolutionary mechanics/history (theory) would be falsified by wildly conflicting evidence. Finding, say, a cro magnon skeleton in a rock strata that was contemporary with the Jurasic era would falsify pretty much every current model.

Thank you for a non-sarcastic, honest answer.

Okay... I'll point out that populations don't "decide" on any such thing, and that it's a strawman. I"ll point out that if there were advantages to being on water or land, that there would be selection pressures and that small differences would be accentuated over time due to reproductive isolation.

I'd tell you that time on a nearly geological time frame allows the replication, mutation and selection to work on a population, because that's the truth, but that saying time "caused it", is bull.

This one is unsatisfying to me. Take another poster's example of the transitional aquatic creature "hippo." I suppose if one hung around long enough (a few billion years), we'd see.......wait a moment, it just occurred to me that "selection pressure" is to the evolutionists what "God" is to the creationist. Creationists say "God did it." Evolutionists say "selection pressures did it." The evolutionist who believes in a supernatural supreme being could say God IS the selection pressure. Then again, selection pressure could be a force of nature like gravity or magnetism. Oh well.

I really don't have a dog in this fight. I agree that ID is a backdoor way of teaching religion in school, especially after watching that PBS special Intelligent Design on Trial.

Peace.

735 Hanoch  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:01:25pm

re: #701 J.S.

I'd respond more fully if I could, but I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

Where in my post did I suggest that the steady state theory was rejected because it "conflicts with biblical teachings?" It was ultimately rejected in favor of the "big bang" theory as referenced in your textbook quote.

I stated the obvious point that the "big bang" theory is more consistent with the Biblical narrative of creation than was the steady state theory. The point of my example was to show that the steady state advocates could have argued that the "big bang" theorists, because the big bang was more consistent with the Bible, were simply attempting to push a religious agenda.

736 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:02:44pm

re: #730 Nat-X

These whale-wannabe-hippos still have to collectively, not individually, mutate. What causes that?

What comic book are you getting that from?
The reasons why it is wrong have been expressed, numerous times, in this thread.
One single organism which can pass its genes on to the genepool, where its genes confer a greater evolutionary fitness, will see selection pressures generally increasing the frequency of such alleles.

The canard that the entire species must "collectively mutate" is science fiction. The very concept that an entire species could undergo change at once is comic book level scifi.

Hippos happen to be well suited to their ecological niche. But if their environment changes over the next five million years, we can expect to see different selection pressures, and different traits will tend to get passed down to offspring more often. Everything is either 'transitional' or extinct.

That's just basic.

737 Zoomie  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:08:01pm

re: #733 J.S.

So spell that out for me JS. What do you mean by Nonradom?

738 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:14:11pm

re: #734 Nat-X

This one is unsatisfying to me.

Ah well?


it just occurred to me that "selection pressure" is to the evolutionists what "God" is to the creationist. Creationists say "God did it." Evolutionists say "selection pressures did it."

That's like saying: It just occurred to me that physicists and Pagans are saying the same thing. The physicists say "the Sun warms the Earth" and the theists say "Great God Ra causes the earth to be warmed." They must be interchangeable.

~sigh~

God is not testable. Not refutable. Not even observable. God must be taken on faith. And that's fine, for the faithful. It's not fine for science.
Selection pressures, on the other hand, can be observed, tested, refuted, replicated, modified, etc...
Science rests and falls on epistemology, not philosophy or theology. Faith is not proof in science. Faith is irrelevant to science.

Here's a basic test.
Take a bunch of bacteria, keep them in a room temperature medium. Then, over successive generations, take a 'founding' population and put them in an environment that is just a bit hotter, each generation. Freeze and save samples of your original population and each successive generation. What you will find is that, after enough generations, the selection pressure you introduced (the ability to survive and thrive in a climate of greater heat), will have yielded a generation which has a much higher percentage of genes which code for heat-resistant properties than the zero generation.

Good luck performing such an experiment for the Hand of God.

739 Hanoch  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:18:45pm

re: #697 Charles

We obviously disagree about the scope of the term "science".

Just out of curiosity, if I were a science teacher, and a student asked me how the universe came to be, what would I be allowed to propose as legitimate theories in the name of science?

740 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:33:05pm

re: #737 Zoomie

So spell that out for me JS. What do you mean by Nonradom?

Not random.

Mutation, to a certain extent, is random. Yes, cells/chromosomes/locations on those chromosomes are more/less resistant to mutation, and so on. And there are statistical probabilities for mutation which mean that many will have a negative or null-value. But mutation is inherently random and can, occasionally, result in positive changes. Even then, the mutation must be present in sex cells in order for it to be passed on to offspring, at least in animals where sexual dimorphism is the rule.

Past that, mating (as should be obvious), is not random. Brilliant, beautiful women don't go to the local homeless shelter to find a mate.

Animals seek out specific mates, for specific reasons, in order to increase the fitness of their offspring. The increasing height of humans, for instance, is directly due to sexual selection as the women of our species 'bootstrap' us in an evolutionary direction. Some mutations, say, one that causes a bird to incorrectly perform its mating song, may limit or eliminate the possibility for reproduction. Some may create super-fecundity, granting an amazing fitness advantage.

Even in plants, a mutation that creates seeds that are more resistant to the environment and have a better chance of rooting and growing, will spread among the population due to non-random factors.

re: #739 Hanoch

We obviously disagree about the scope of the term "science".

Just out of curiosity, if I were a science teacher, and a student asked me how the universe came to be, what would I be allowed to propose as legitimate theories in the name of science?

Not to answer for Charles, but as an educator myself:

Any of the theories of cosmology. Bonus points for pointing out the holes in the theories and the further research that has to be done to increase our understanding past current cosmological models.
None of which, of course, are "God did it."

The answers "we're not sure" and "we don't know" and "we were wrong and are revising our models" are not signs of weakness in science, but strength. Honesty is always important when dealing with facts and only a fool pretends to hold certainty where none can exist.

741 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:44:29pm

re: #740 FinnAgain

It was recently discovered that blue eyes were a mutation.

742 J.S.  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 8:52:04pm

re: #737 Zoomie

Random means that in a selection process each individual has an equal opportunity of being chosen/selected. Consider, for example, a deck of cards. if the deck has been properly shuffled, then each card in the deck (say there are 52 cards) has an equal opportunity (equally likely) of being picked. It means that the black cards are not given an advantage over the red cards (or spades given a preference to clubs, etc.) If a deck of cards has been manipulated (stacked) so that the ace of spades comes up first, then the cards are not randomly shuffled. (it's a biased selection). There's an algorithm for determining the "degree of randomness" -- that's how investigators can detect cheats...(If you consider the problems of making sure certain things are truly random -- it can become problematic -- for example, if you put marbles into a pitcher -- well, the shape of the pitcher could favor certain marbles (the ones on top) being selected as opposed to those marbles on the bottom. That's why, btw, with certain lotteries one sees balls blown into the air and rotating -- it's to ensure no "heavy" ball is favored and drops first.) Anyway, the key here is "equally likely.." and organisms existing in specific environments are not all "equally likely" to be deemed "fit" (I'm using the term "fit" in its Darwinian sense of passing on genetic information.)

743 gman  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:00:39pm

re: #739 Hanoch

We obviously disagree about the scope of the term "science".


Hey, you're using the infamous Clinton defense:

It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.

Nice try, but I don't see it getting much mileage here.

744 six-gun-neo-con  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:11:43pm

Sharmuta
"LOL- isn't that what the critics of the public schools say? That they have become nothing more that centers to promote self-esteem?"

From CAPE - Council of American Private Education
"Choosing a school for their children is one of the most important decisions parents must make. For the parents of more than six million children, the choice is private education. They choose religious and independent schools for many reasons: quality academics, a safe and orderly environment, moral and ethical values, caring teachers, supportive communities, and much more."

So why is it important to teach evolution to a student body that is out of control, an out of control environment victimizes 90% of the children in America who do not go to private schools. School prayer and the reading of the Christian Bible in the classroom was struck down in 1962-1963, after being observed and practiced for 170 years. The result was just as George Washington predicted in his farewell address upon finishing his second term as President, that without religious morality, there is nothing but chaos.

The Founding Fathers stated that without the Christian religion, there is no other more source of moral teaching than the teaching of the New Testament. And THAT was why it was encouraged in the public classroom for 170 years until 1962. Since then, America has achieved being the Western nation with the most divorces, the nation with the most violence, and as of 2008 ranks barely above South Korea in regards to education, and one of the highest in drug use (especially with America's Pop icons).

Evolution vs Creationism? Doesn't matter anymore compared to far greater issues facing this country’s future generations.

745 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:19:23pm

re: #744 six-gun-neo-con

Funny- I didn't see "Intelligent Design" specifically noted as a reason. Not only that, but thank you for backing up my previous post where I stated there were a myriad of reasons parents choose private schools. If you really think the solution to the public school system it to turn them into Americanized Christian madrassas, then I suggest you go back to the drawing board.

746 gman  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 9:45:45pm

re: #744 six-gun-neo-con

Sharmuta
"LOL- isn't that what the critics of the public schools say? That they have become nothing more that centers to promote self-esteem?"

From CAPE - Council of American Private Education
"Choosing a school for their children is one of the most important decisions parents must make. For the parents of more than six million children, the choice is private education. They choose religious and independent schools for many reasons: quality academics, a safe and orderly environment, moral and ethical values, caring teachers, supportive communities, and much more."

So why is it important to teach evolution to a student body that is out of control, an out of control environment victimizes 90% of the children in America who do not go to private schools. School prayer and the reading of the Christian Bible in the classroom was struck down in 1962-1963, after being observed and practiced for 170 years. The result was just as George Washington predicted in his farewell address upon finishing his second term as President, that without religious morality, there is nothing but chaos.

The Founding Fathers stated that without the Christian religion, there is no other more source of moral teaching than the teaching of the New Testament. And THAT was why it was encouraged in the public classroom for 170 years until 1962. Since then, America has achieved being the Western nation with the most divorces, the nation with the most violence, and as of 2008 ranks barely above South Korea in regards to education, and one of the highest in drug use (especially with America's Pop icons).

Evolution vs Creationism? Doesn't matter anymore compared to far greater issues facing this country’s future generations.

Wow, so because we had it in our schools for 170 years means we should continue doing it today. If everyone used that line of reasoning, we would all still be living in caves.

747 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:54:48pm

re: #744 six-gun-neo-con


So why is it important to teach evolution to a student body that is out of control, an out of control environment victimizes 90% of the children in America who do not go to private schools.

90% of all children are in 'out of control' schools?
You of course have iron clad proof to back this up, right?


School prayer and the reading of the Christian Bible in the classroom was struck down in 1962-1963, after being observed and practiced for 170 years. The result was just as George Washington predicted in his farewell address upon finishing his second term as President, that without religious morality, there is nothing but chaos.

Correlation does not imply causation.
You have to do a hell of a lot more than show that two events happened at (roughly) the same time.
Besides which, legalized discrimination against blacks was rampant while the bible was still being used in classrooms. Guess it didn't have much of an impact there, eh?


The Founding Fathers stated that without the Christian religion, there is no other more source of moral teaching than the teaching of the New Testament.

Oh?
Someone should've told them.

"the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion"

Not, of course, that the fallacies of Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Tradition, Appeal to Antiquity, Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc or Slippery Slope are particularly convincing even if your statement was true.


Since then, America has achieved being the Western nation with the most divorces, the nation with the most violence, and as of 2008 ranks barely above South Korea in regards to education, and one of the highest in drug use (especially with America's Pop icons).

We also instituted the civil rights movement, achieved global dominance in finance, entertainment, science and higher education. I guess dropping the bible was a good idea, eh, eh?
(You going to show logical proof ever, or just a correlation?)

Oh, and while I'm at it, America is the western nation with the most violence?
You sure? So, Yugoslavia was probably pretty peaceful?


Evolution vs Creationism? Doesn't matter anymore compared to far greater issues facing this country’s future generations.

Yeah, religious fundamentalists who are even more aggressive in their attempts to destroy education and want the bible to be a part of curriculum outside of comp lit.

748 centralvalleyguy  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 10:59:06pm

This is down right ridiculous to focus on this story.

How about focus on some stories where evolutionists have done strange things? There'd be too man of those. Hey, how about run a bunch of stories on anti-abortion nuts who kill doctors? Go LGF! Way to broaden that user base!

LGF is now down right hostile to to those of us who don't worship at the altar of evolution.

I'm visiting this site a lot less than I used to. Sad, really. There's no need to be so caustic to the zillions of conservatives who want more than evolution discussed.

This site is really now dominated by fairly arrogant, insulting, mean secularists who are borderline zealots for their religion of evolution. Best of luck to ya'll...

749 FinnAgain  Mon, Jun 23, 2008 11:18:22pm

Don't let the door hit ya.

750 Slumbering Behemoth  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 12:31:47am

*whimper* "Mommy, mommy"! *sob* "The Lizards were mean to me"! *whine* "They hurt my widdle feelings"!

/crybaby

751 Slumbering Behemoth  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 12:41:34am

re: #741 Sharmuta

It was recently discovered that blue eyes were a mutation.

Holy crap, I'm a mutant!

/not like that is news to any of y'all

752 zoomie  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 5:28:57am

re: #742 J.S.

J.S thanks for the thorough explanation. That is the classic statistical description for random.

The point I am making is that the evolutionary theory is based on the materialist world view. All living things developed by unplanned, accidental processes. There are some nuances like the male or female attempting to choose some characteristics of a mate, but behind it all are accidental unplanned physical forces. The National Science Foundation version does not allow for the intervention of God to tweak along the way. Heaven forbid... Carbon 14 forbid that should happen because all of life and culture is explained by the underlying material evolutionary process.

If you are true to that view, there is no cosmic truth, justice, or Spiritual law. I am not sure what the purpose of life is in that context.

Religion fits neatly under the materialist explanation. Religion is an illusion and part of the adaptation process.
Evolution of Religion

But here, evolutionary theory has overreached. Now it speaks "ex cathedra" as the all knowing all wise spokesman for all reality.

But there are spiritual forces in the universe. God is there. He is not silent. He has spoken via his creation and he has spoken via revelation. The reason we have mind, will, emotion and a universal moral law within our hearts is not because of photons striking CO2 and H2O. It because in the beginning the Logos willed it so. Shoot I have a great time with God every day. Enjoy every minute of it. But that's another subject. Out here.

753 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 8:17:20am

re: #751 Slumbering Behemoth

I actually find that story to be a pretty good example of this overall topic.

754 J.S.  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 8:50:38am

re: #752 zoomie

Do you eat? Do you go to the bathroom? If you're cut, do you not bleed?

I look at it this way -- there are two realms -- science and religion. But, I don't believe the two need to be antagonists or at war. If your body suffers syptoms of an illness, you'll seek out a trained physician. If you want to know how best to live your life (in terms of morality, ethics, etc.) you'll seek out religious leaders/teachers. (Science won't provide the answers).

755 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 9:07:18am

Creationists remind me of kids who continue to believe in Santa Claus, even after they scooted under their parents' bed in early December and found wrapped packages addressed to them from Santa.

Nietszche once said that faith is 'not wanting to know', but it is even worse than that; it is actively wanting NOT to know, and not wanting anyone else to know, either, if they feel the knowledge to be cognitively dissonant with their beliefs. That's why they wanna madrassize the public schools; kids are easier to brainwash. And they wanna do so in order to win the popular opinion contest, from the cradle up; the truth of the matter be damned.

It just screams profound emotional insecurity concerning their own beliefs to me, and a passive-aggressive response to same. If they're not allowed to brainwash kids in public schools, then they're being victimized: that stance is a paragon of psychological projection.

756 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 9:44:31am

re: #754 J.S.

If your body suffers syptoms of an illness, you'll seek out a trained physician.

Well- unless you're a member of the Christian Scientists- but let's not go there.

757 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 10:57:33am

re: #752 zoomie


If you are true to that view, there is no cosmic truth, justice, or Spiritual law. I am not sure what the purpose of life is in that context.

You could, of course, decide these things for yourself and be responsible for your own life and your own purpose.
Or you could pass the buck.

One has to wonder, of course, what would happen if a particularly charismatic fellow were to convince you that certain parts of the bible should be followed more than others. According to your own claims, of course, God once told us the best manner of owning slaves and stoning rebellious women to death.
The standard "God told me to do it, it's settled" is rather terrifying.


But here, evolutionary theory has overreached. Now it speaks "ex cathedra" as the all knowing all wise spokesman for all reality.

Wrong, yet again.
It speaks for how certain behaviors in humanity evolved. That countless religions have cropped up through all of human history shows that there is a religious impulse. That even you would admit that 99.9% of them have been false proves that something other than any actual deity is responsible for religion. Thus, of course, you are an atheist with regard to 99.9% of every religion through the world's history, and look to a material answer (unless, of course, you believe your God is a liar and a trickster and purposefully made people believe the wrong thing all through human history).

Since, unless you believe in a liar-God, you'd have to admit that there is a non theistic reason for the history of human religion, it falls to us to discover what reasons such a behavior might have had. Those, of course, would be social, cognitive, behavioral, etc... all firmly in the realm of the genetic code.


But there are spiritual forces in the universe. God is there. He is not silent. He has spoken via his creation and he has spoken via revelation. The reason we have mind, will, emotion and a universal moral law within our hearts is not because of photons striking CO2 and H2O. It because in the beginning the Logos willed it so.

And here we go from personal faith, which by definition cannot be contradicted and is perfectly valid, to using personal faith as a substitution for rational thought, and what's more, a substitute for rational proof, which by definition cannot be successful and is totally invalid.

It's also worth noting that your 'reasoning' would sound no different if it came from any different religon. "we have mind, will, blah blah blah because Alllah wills it." "we have mind, will, blah blah blah because Goddess created us to glorify Her." "we have mind, will, blah blah blah because Odin the All Father wishes us to become worthy of Him."

Like I said, you're an atheist when it comes to every other religion through all of history, but when it comes to yours, not only are you a theist, but you'll scoff at the truth if it contradicts what you perceive as your religious truth.

758 J.S.  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 11:59:06am

re: #756 Sharmuta

You've got to be kidding me -- and the name "Christian Scientists" -- oh, the irony...

What bothers me far more than having teachers teach science (devoid of supernatualisms) in a science class -- is the prevalence (growth?) of pseudo-sciences...(astrology, mind-reading, ESP, chiropractors, fortune tellers, etc. -- they strike me as nefarious con-artists out to defraud people...)

759 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 12:19:09pm

Sure, most of 'em are con artists, but it's hard to say that faith in the divining power of tarot cards is invalid while faith in any of our modern religious notions is totally cool.

As with everything else, you roll the dice and take your chances, and the believers are responsible for the consequences of their beliefs. I don't see there being any real difference between someone who refuses to get a blood transfusion when they're bleeding to death because God wouldn't want it, and someone who spends money that they can't afford in order to go to a fortune teller who'll tell them... how to make more money.

760 J.S.  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 2:00:21pm

re: #759 FinnAgain

"As with everything else, you roll the dice and take your chances, and the believers are responsible for the consequences of their beliefs."

Here in Canada there were some recent interesting court cases, including one coming up. One involved the death of a teenager (at the time the parents were JWs...and a blood transfusion was not given...their daughter died; now one of the parents, the father, quit the church -- his dispute with the church led to a divorce -- and he wanted to sue the Jehovah Witnesses...the litigant believes his daughter was brain-washed. His attempt to launch a lawsuit, though, was thrown out of court -- perhaps in part because he had no lawyer -- he's bankrupt. He wants to appeal.) And, then, there was another lawsuit -- this involved a Chiropractor...a woman went to the "clinic", had what's called a "neck manipulation" which left her paralyzed from the neck down...now she's confined to a hospital bed -- quadriplegic...The province in which I reside (Alberta) has a public health care system which partially funds visits to a Chiropractor (that's the use of public monies -- up to $200 -- for visits to a Chiropractor.) So, unfortunately, it's not always just the believers being held responsible for the consequences of their beliefs...(sometimes, many, many others are adversely affected).

761 Slumbering Behemoth  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 2:02:24pm

re: #753 Sharmuta

Oh I agree. It's just that I couldn't pass on an opportunity for self deprecation. My only regret is that you didn't find it funny. Oh well, can't knock 'em all outta the park.

762 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 2:29:28pm

re: #760 J.S.

True enough. I'd certainly posit that for children and the mentally infirm, health/safety/medical matters for those groups are areas in which faith simply cannot replace facts, and if I had my way, it would be criminal to do so. Use prayer instead of seat belts for your children, and they die in an auto accident? Hope you enjoy your conviction for reckless endangerment and criminal neglect. Refuse to get your children immunized because vaccines cause cancer/autism/demonic possession, and your child ends up being near-blinded for life by measles? Enjoy your conviction.

Of course, there are some who will howl and fling rhetorical crap, wailing about how people are worshiping at the altar of facts.
I'll take protecting children above my tender and delicate sensibilities, any day.

For adults who are sound of mind, however, I have no sympathy. I don't care if it's putting 10% of their income to the Greater Glory of God or playing the lottery every day or spending thousands of dollars on phone psychics in order to find True Love. It's their choice, and their consequences to take.
I also don't really differentiate between any unproven, unprovable, untestable, irrefutable belief and another. In my mind, belief in Xenu or Yahweh or Ramtha are epistemologicaly equal and I've never understood the hostility some religious types show for people who hold different faiths than they do.

763 J.S.  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 3:29:43pm

re: #762 FinnAgain

I tend to agree (with respect to children and putting a child's welfare foremost -- that's a primary responsibility, and violators should be held accountable). I looked up the Chiropractor lawsuit case -- wondering if the Alberta government was going to be taken to court or named in the lawsuit. And, yes, the Health ministry has been named in the lawsuit. (I might add, I tend to agree with holding the government partially responsible -- the government gives this quackery the imprimatur of "sound medical practice" to Chiropractors by funding Chiropractors. Chiropractors should be de-listed -- that is, if a person wants to see a Chiropractor, he/she should pay for it entirely out of their own pockets (not through government health care). here's the article. (I thought she was a quadriplegic, but it appears she's regained the use of one arm..)

764 zoomie  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 3:35:22pm

re: #754 J.S.

JS , Do I eat? Not sure where you are going but yes I get the munchies. Do I have a life? Not if keep hangin' at LGF.

I think most secular progressives and religious folks see it much the way you describe JS. And I totally agree that science and religion are not at war, especially in the West. Empirical science is completely compatible with the christian world view and many believe it flowed from it as the Renaissance flowed from the Catholic Universities of W Europe. Seems I recall that Newton, Galileo, Pascal, Bacon, Boyle, Kepler were at least comfortable with their faith.

They are indeed parallel, overlapping, intertwined spheres. Neither are in illusion. Both are grounded in reality and how the cosmos is really wired.

765 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 4:05:47pm

re: #764 zoomie

And I totally agree that science and religion are not at war, especially in the West.

Except, ya know, people who attack evolution because it conflicts with their religion and people who try to hamstring education so that religion can be taught in science classes.

But other than that, yeah, things are peachy.


Empirical science is completely compatible with the christian world view and many believe it flowed from it as the Renaissance flowed from the Catholic Universities of W Europe.

They'd be wrong. On all counts.

Ibn al-Haytham created what we now know as the scientific method, and it, in fact, grew out of his skepticism and faith as a Muslim. He believed that only God could be perfect and that all human knowledge and research would be flawed and a research methodology had to account for it.
Likewise, the Renaisance did not flow from Catholic universities. In fact, much of the knowledge that the west had lost and rediscovered (thus, a re-birth), had been held by Arab scholars. Which isn't to say that the Arab texts, alone, would have led to the renaissance or that the Arab culture at the time could have enjoyed the fruits of such knowledge. But to claim it flowed from Christianity is simply revisionist history, and should be swept away with such dust.

Further, science is only "compatible with the Christian worldview" if that worldview is not a fundamentalist one. Science disproves a great many things, from YEC to creationism to a global flood and so on. Christianity is compatible with science as long as Christianity does not try to usurp science.
You, for instance, have served as an object lesson that, backed by a desire to protect religion, science can be deliberately misinterpreted and strawmen can be created to avoid actual facts. To claim that your, personal worldview is compatible with modern evolutionary theory is simply false.


Seems I recall that Newton, Galileo, Pascal, Bacon, Boyle, Kepler were at least comfortable with their faith.

Galileo? Before or after he was forced to recant by the threat of being imprisoned for the rest of his natural life? Perhaps we should bring up Bruno of Nola? His faith certainly kept him warm.

In any case, the question is not that scientists can be religious. They obviously can. The question is not whether or not the faithful can practice the scientific method, they obviously can. The questions are whether or not it is intellectually honest to reject valid science because it conflicts with religion, or to apply religious ideology/theology to science, or to start with religious conclusions and then cherrypick data in an attempt to get the conclusion you want or to distort and mock science because it threatens certain religious views.
The answer to all of those should, obviously, be no.


They are indeed parallel, overlapping, intertwined spheres.

If by overlapping and intertwined you mean have nothing at all to do with each other, do not address the same areas, cannot possibly serve to confirm or refute the other and in their proper course of use, will never touch on each other at all?
Then sure, they're overlapping and intertwined.

Both are grounded in reality and how the cosmos is really wired.

Except, ya know, where religion says one thing and science says the truth. "a Great Flood" and "no Great Flood" are mutually exclusive and one, perforce, is wrong.

766 Hanoch  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 4:09:07pm

re: #740 FinnAgain

Any of the theories of cosmology.

Boy, that is awfully vague.

The answers "we're not sure" and "we don't know" and "we were wrong and are revising our models" are not signs of weakness in science, but strength. Honesty is always important when dealing with facts and only a fool pretends to hold certainty where none can exist.

Of course. The search for scientific knowledge always proceeds from an initial point where "we don't know". That is the whole point of science. But that does not prevent one from presenting and examining theories. Indeed, that is an essential step in the scientific process.

By the way, I assume you would be just honest when discussing the theory of evolution by presenting it as theory and not, as you say, a certainty.

767 Hanoch  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 4:25:23pm

re: #765 FinnAgain

Except, ya know, where religion says one thing and science says the truth. "a Great Flood" and "no Great Flood" are mutually exclusive and one, perforce, is wrong.

Gee, you seem to be quite sure of yourself. Funny how you find it so easy to ignore the findings of other scientists. Comments like these reinforce my view that the real dogmatists are not those in the religious camp.

768 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 4:29:31pm

re: #766 Hanoch

Boy, that is awfully vague.

No. It isn't.
If you taught economics, you'd be able to teach your students about all of the modern economic theories.
If you taught math, you'd be able to teach your students about all of the various arguments and views on Set Theory and Number Theory.
If you taught science, you'd be able to teach your students about all the various views and counter views on cosmology.

There is nothing vague about it. You asked what a science teacher should teach about the origins of the universe, I responded that he could feel free to teach cosmology, and that bonus points would be awarded for teaching the complexities, limits and controversies in the field.
That of course means scientific disagreements, not "well the bible says that the universe was created in 7 days, so there is an alternate theory that needs to be taught."


Of course. The search for scientific knowledge always proceeds from an initial point where "we don't know".

The point, however, is that even after research it may remain at such a level, with appropriate caveats and bits that we have learned. We certainly are no longer ignorant of quantum mechanics, but anybody who claims to understand not only the quantum world, but the sub-quantum and macroscopic worlds and how they all relate to each other?
You'd either be talking to a fool or a liar.

Likewise, when looking at any theory, there will be certain things that are unknown, certain explanations that are best-fit answers, and certain scenarios that are unknown and thus, unexplained. Many creationists/ID'ers point to holes (or more often, supposed holes) in evolutionary theory as a reason to discard the whole thing, and not only discard it, but to sneak in anti-science since. It's like saying that we're not sure if Quantum Gravity or String Theory are right, and both have some holes in 'em and parts that we can't explain/prove yet, so yetis really cause gravity.


But that does not prevent one from presenting and examining theories.

Scientific theories, no.
Religion masquerading as science, yes.


By the way, I assume you would be just honest when discussing the theory of evolution by presenting it as theory and not, as you say, a certainty.

As I have posted several times in this thread and the last one, evolution is a fact as much as gravity is.
Too often people deliberately confuse evolution (the fact) with evolutionary theory (theory). Even then, a theory is just about the single strongest formulation in science. And by the same token, no theory is ever a "certainty". Any theory for which falsification is impossible is no longer science.

On that there can be no honest debate.

However, there are numerous competing theories of evolution and theories of gravity, none of which change the fact that biological organisms are based on a genetic code, this code is heritable, and certain genes provide greater fitness and benefits under certain selection pressures than do others, or that an object which you drop will be drawn towards the center of the Earth unless another force intervenes.

769 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 4:39:04pm

re: #767 Hanoch

Gee, you seem to be quite sure of yourself.

Facts will do that for a man.


Funny how you find it so easy to ignore the findings of other scientists.

Well now, that was refreshingly and directly dishonest of you. Saves time tap dancing. Of course I find it easy to disregard the invented fiction that you created and tried to switch with actual scientists' findings.
Easy enough for me to rebut by, well, quoting your own cite:

"Says Weil, "We found that indeed a flood happened around that time. From core samples, we see that a flood broke through the natural barrier separating the Mediterranean Sea and the freshwater Black Sea, bringing with it seashells that only grow in a marine environment. There was no doubt that it was a fast flood -- one that covered an expanse four times the size of Israel"

So, nope, no evidence at all of a worldwide flood that erased all of humanity and all but the pairs of several animal species, as the Bible claims.
Nothing ignored by me in my 100% factual statement that Noah's flood is a simple myth, much like that of the Babylonians, Greeks or Norse.

Nobody has disagreed that there were probably many massive floods throughout humanity's history, or that some of them were probably terrifying enough as to generate myths about them. The fact, however, is that there never was a global flood, and Noah's Great Flood is a fiction.


Comments like these reinforce my view that the real dogmatists are not those in the religious camp.

Whatever floats your boat.

Speaking of which, you curious as to how much space would be required, simply for two of every species of beetle on the planet? There are roughly 300,000 species of beetles. That's 600,000 breeding beetle pairs. Some have a gestitation period of less than fourty days.
How many cubic cubits do you think that 600,000 beetles would take up, before we got to a single other animal on the planet?

770 J.S.  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 5:29:53pm

re: #764 zoomie

I was attempting (through the questions about bodily functions) to have you think about living in a "material" world. (imo, of course, you're free to disagree -- if you want to know more about the reality of the material world -- you'd study the sciences. Science provides the best insight into how the world/universe operates. But, science (again, in my view) does not answer all questions...(nor, btw, do the majority of scientists make such claims). So, if you study music and compose orchestral suites, science probably won't be your "strong point" (that's not to say of course, that a scientist couldn't study, say, harmonics or the physics of sound, and compose or vice versa. but it does seem to me to be different fields of endeavor. Ditto for composing poetry or writing novels or doing a billion other things outside the realm of "science." To be an accomplished opera singer, you don't necessarily need a degree in physics.) And I don't think science and religion should be at all "intertwined". I think they should/need to be kept separate -- it's when the two try to edge into the other realm that problems arise. It's when the creationists import theocratic doctrine into science classrooms that problems arise...or when atheists dictate to scientists that scientists must become atheists, or else they're not "good" scientists. this treading into areas where they have no business/no expertise is the problem (imo)...(the same, i think, is true with respect to politics and religion. Either through religion becoming politicized or vice versa -- politics using "religiosity" to gain votes, etc. -- it's problematic and detrimental -- it tarnishes religious bodies, as much as it does politics. keep the pulpit out of politics, and politics out of the pulpit.)

771 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 5:33:57pm

re: #761 Slumbering Behemoth

Oh, sorry, my friend! I'm a mutant too.

772 zoomie  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 6:22:30pm

re: #765 FinnAgain

FinnAgain, as an evangelical Christian I am completely comfortable with science and faith. I do not know a Christian who is not. I enjoy science and really enjoy growing in faith, struggle by struggle. I know I see through a mirror dimly on the spiritual level but God still gives me joy.

You are an expert in science. You don't appear comfortable with religion. That would make sense. As a fundamentalist materialist, you believe there is only energy and matter. You believe that evolution proceeded by chance and not by design. Otherwise there might be a designer. There might be a Spirit. And we might have obligations. You have a doctrine in your materialism that religion is a product of cultural adaptation and grouping for protection. But there is not hope.

So I feel like my path is easier. I seems like people need purpose and some sense of hope. And yet it appears materialism leads to despair in the sense that we are all just getting by, waitin’ to die and maybe pass on a little DNA. You can peanut butter smear a little self actualization or existentialism on that. But it seems like the song of the materialist has to be “There is NO answer blowing in the wind. There is only atmosphere, photons, and the wind. All else is an illusion or adaptation.”

773 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 6:26:14pm

re: #772 zoomie

Your rhetoric tips your hand.

774 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 6:36:13pm

re: #773 Sharmuta

Your rhetoric tips your hand.

Nail. Head.
Smackeroo.

re: #772 zoomie


You are an expert in science.

Certainly not. I possess what I would describe as baseline level competence in science. I am, and my profession demands that I be, an expert in critical thinking, which indeed has significant overlap with science.


You don't appear comfortable with religion.

Nonsense. I have no reason to be anything less than comfortable with it. Just because I don't subscribe to it and I recognize that attempting to replace science with religion is abhorrent, doesn't mean that I'm at all uncomfortable with religion. I still find shabbat services to be quite relaxing.


As a fundamentalist materialist, you believe there is only energy and matter.

Ahhh yes, one of those "fundamentalist" believers in facts.
How dogmatic of me.

You have a doctrine in your materialism that religion is a product of cultural adaptation and grouping for protection. But there is not hope.

Wrong on both counts.
First, I have, numerous times, said that there can be no proof or refutation as to whether or not there is a God or Gods, that it properly lies in the domain of faith. There may be One True Religion caused by a God, while the rest are biologically driven. That, of course, doesn't change the fact that you own logic compels you to either accept a Liar God, or that all other religions than yours are biologically based.
Hope also need have nothing to do with religion, at all. I improve the world by my actions.

I have no idea why that would not be sufficient.


I seems like people need purpose and some sense of hope.

More fallacy. There is nothing inherent in not being a theist that prevents one from deciding, themselves, what their own purpose is for existing. Mine is to leave the world a better place than I found it.
No deity required.


And yet it appears materialism leads to despair in the sense that we are all just getting by, waitin’ to die and maybe pass on a little DNA.

Just because you might feel that your life was horrible if you didn't believe in God, doesn't mean that others do. And, I might add, if you honestly believe that, it shows that your belief in God is something of a defense mechanism.

775 zoomie  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:03:10pm

re: #770 J.S.

JS we are close and it may be a matter of degrees. I try to have the attitude that you do which is to have a bit of humility.

But I will draw a line at a point. Hard core evolutionists tell me that religion is really an illusion. It is genetically encoded. So we see it in 99% of the herds, etc. etc. That is not science that was discovered in double blind lab tests. It may be found in peer reviewed literature. But it does not flow from empirical science. It flows from materialist philosophy. It flows from a critical assumption that there is only matter and energy and the human brain staring back at the soup that accidentally created it.

I don’t consider my view a blind leap of faith. I see evidence for His presence. I sense His recorded revelation is compelling and extremely encouraging. I sense that I have a spirit in my soul that was extinguished like an unlit candle. And I sense that the Holy Spirit lit that birthday cake candle and so I have a little spark.

And I agree we should not fill the science classroom with personal spiritual experience. Hey, God said go to work SIX days a week. Figure this planet out. He did not say meditate SIX days a week. So don’t panic. Those of my ilk aren’t trying to turn the science lab into a monastery. (Though the Irish monks saved the records of western civilization !) Cheers.

776 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:19:44pm

re: #775 zoomie

It may be found in peer reviewed literature. But it does not flow from empirical science.



Wrong again.

After so many distortions of science, one really does have to wonder at your claims that you bear it no enmity. Especially since you take issue with the scientific method itself and disparage it with the pejorative "fundamentalist".

777 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:21:48pm

I have been considering these issues and expressing myself concerning them in poetic form for some time.

Here is where those who are interested can read what I have been able to sift and glean:

[Link: blog.myspace.com...]

778 Hanoch  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:37:32pm

re: #768 FinnAgain

I read your post and I will stand by my original assertion that "teach cosmology" is a vague answer to a pretty straightforward question. What theory or theories of cosmology purport to explain the origin of the universe?

Your statement that "evolution is a fact as much as gravity is" is hard to swallow. I have never heard of a sentient human being, let alone a scientist, denying the existence of gravity. However, I have heard a number of scientists who do not accept evolution as fact. Seems to this casual observer the issue is not as settled as you suggest.

Regarding the flood bit, if you had said there is currently no evidence of a global flood, that would be one thing. To say, however, that there never was a global flood is a bit much. Scientists have held beliefs for long periods of time only to watch those beliefs get turned on their heads.

779 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:38:28pm

re: #776 FinnAgain


Wrong again.

After so many distortions of science, one really does have to wonder at your claims that you bear it no enmity. Especially since you take issue with the scientific method itself and disparage it with the pejorative "fundamentalist".

It tipped it's hand already spouting off phillip johnson talking points. While all of your posts have been spot on- it's like talking to a brick wall with that one. You won't make a dent- it's entrenched.

780 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:43:09pm

re: #778 Hanoch

There is nothing in the geological record to support a global flood. They've looked. It's not there. There is however, much evidence to support a local flood. So to say science might find they were wrong on this point is a bit much. Unless you want to believe Ellen White.

781 Hanoch  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:55:42pm

re: #780 Sharmuta

Sorry, but if you're trying to convince me that we know all there is to know about the world, I'm not buying that one. As Carl Sagan supposedly said "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

782 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:57:35pm

re: #764 zoomie

JS , Do I eat? Not sure where you are going but yes I get the munchies. Do I have a life? Not if keep hangin' at LGF.

I think most secular progressives and religious folks see it much the way you describe JS. And I totally agree that science and religion are not at war, especially in the West. Empirical science is completely compatible with the christian world view and many believe it flowed from it as the Renaissance flowed from the Catholic Universities of W Europe. Seems I recall that Newton, Galileo, Pascal, Bacon, Boyle, Kepler were at least comfortable with their faith.

They are indeed parallel, overlapping, intertwined spheres. Neither are in illusion. Both are grounded in reality and how the cosmos is really wired.

In light of your comment lamenting "fundamentalist materialism", I find this comment even more disingenuous that I did upon first reading it. This is Christian fundamentalist taqiyya.

783 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 7:59:48pm

re: #781 Hanoch

Sorry, but if you're trying to convince me that we know all there is to know about the world, I'm not buying that one. As Carl Sagan supposedly said "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

I said no such thing, so you can take your strawman back and try again.

784 FinnAgain  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 8:02:03pm

re: #779 Sharmuta

It tipped it's hand already spouting off phillip johnson talking points. While all of your posts have been spot on- it's like talking to a brick wall with that one. You won't make a dent- it's entrenched.

Ah, thanks. I didn't know about Johnson, I'll have to read up on him some more. Blech.
And yeah, I'm more arguing for the peanut gallery at this point. I don't expect to convince a true believer, but I do think I can show his thinking process to be what it is, despite his evasions.

re: #778 Hanoch

What theory or theories of cosmology purport to explain the origin of the universe?

So you want me to do your research for you?
I will give you a hint though, since all of space and all of time are contained in Universe,indeed, they make up Universe, talking about a "time" "before" the Big Bang is like asking what you looked like before your father met your mother.
I'd also point out the reality of Virtual Particles.

Still, you could either google it, or be expected to already know it if you were a science teacher.


Your statement that "evolution is a fact as much as gravity is" is hard to swallow.

Then rebut me with facts and logic.
I'll wait.


I have never heard of a sentient human being, let alone a scientist, denying the existence of gravity. However, I have heard a number of scientists who do not accept evolution as fact.

Bandwagon fallacy. Doesn't prove anything, anyways, as gravity is not true because someone voted on it, and evolution is not false become some crackpot 'scientists' disagree with it.
And no, it doesn't matter how many 'scientists' believe evolution to be false, doesn't change anything.
I gave you some very concrete and specific examples as to why evolution is a fact, as distinct from the various theories of evolutionary mechanics.
Can you disprove any of them, or are you simply offering up the fallacy of appeal to authority?


Seems to this casual observer the issue is not as settled as you suggest.

Luckily science works on facts and not votes.
Prove a single fact I pointed out to be wrong.
Just one.


Regarding the flood bit, if you had said there is currently no evidence of a global flood, that would be one thing. To say, however, that there never was a global flood is a bit much. Scientists have held beliefs for long periods of time only to watch those beliefs get turned on their heads.

Fallacy of Red Herring. Fallacy of Division.

Just because science contains mistakes, does not mean that geological sciences dealing with a universal flood are mistaken. And yes, we can say with certainly that there was never a global flood, because there is no evidence of it. If there was, it would've left tell-tale evidence. There is no such evidence. It didn't ever happen.

785 Hanoch  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 8:04:07pm

re: #780 Sharmuta

Sorry, I thought you said:

There is nothing in the geological record to support a global flood. They've looked. It's not there.

Given that you actually said:

There is nothing in the geological record to support a global flood. They've looked. It's not there.

I'll respond as follows:

Sorry, but if you're trying to convince me that we know all there is to know about the world, I'm not buying that one. As Carl Sagan supposedly said "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

Darn those strawmen!

786 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 8:12:45pm

re: #784 FinnAgain

Here's some reading on phillip johnson and his philosophy:

Theistic realism

phillip johnson

He helped write the wedge strategy

My favorite money quote from johnson:

Johnson calls his movement "The Wedge." The objective, he said, is to convince people that Darwinism is inherently atheistic, thus shifting the debate from creationism vs. evolution to the existence of God vs. the non-existence of God. From there people are introduced to "the truth" of the Bible and then "the question of sin" and finally "introduced to Jesus."

While it's all fine and good, imo, to "introduce people adults to Jesus", I have a major problem with the attempt to bring children into this by using public school classrooms as their vehicle. I'll be even more frank- they espouse these positions and wonder why people are turned off by Christianity. This is exactly why my father didn't raise me in a church environment.

787 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 8:16:30pm

re: #785 Hanoch

Yes- I did say that. To which you responded:

Sorry, but if you're trying to convince me that we know all there is to know about the world, I'm not buying that one.

Nowhere did I say such a thing. You're subscribing a position to me I did not advocate. That's the definition of a strawman.

788 Sharmuta  Tue, Jun 24, 2008 8:23:57pm