Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.
Helms was known as "Senator No" for his staunch opposition to an array of liberal causes, including affirmative action, funding for the arts, gay rights, and a holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
...Yowza. I get the first one, but this is getting real reactionary here...
In the Olde Dayes, Jesse Helms epitomized everything I mocked in a politician. His very name was a synonym for "ignorant intolerance" in the milieu I grew up in.
Now, I have a very different perspective. While I still disagree with some of his positions, I now agree with others.
Helms was known as "Senator No" for his staunch opposition to an array of liberal causes, including affirmative action, funding for the arts, gay rights, and a holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
...Yowza. I get the first one, but this is getting real reactionary here...
Jesse Helms, you rat bastard, burn in hell.
by Al Obama
Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 09:02:30 AM PDT
Please dear God, let there really be a hell. Because if there really IS a hell then Jesse Helms is already consumed by it's lowest depths. He's wailing for eternity with his blood brothers; Adolf, Mao, Stalin and the rest of the worst of the subset of human beings who have crossed from mere mortal to eternal evil. Satanic. Jesse joins his kin, Strom Thurmond, Bull Connor and a host of other vicious racist fucks who have taken it upon themselves to very nearly ruin the core principle that this country was founded upon: equality.
I always thought he was one of those "old crones" who for some reason or another kept getting elected to the Senate time and time again (see Thurmond). Of course at that age they were simply there for the MAD Magazine humor value.
In the Olde Dayes, Jesse Helms epitomized everything I mocked in a politician. His very name was a synonym for "ignorant intolerance" in the milieu I grew up in.
Now, I have a very different perspective. While I still disagree with some of his positions, I now agree with others.
re: #26 NJDhockeyfan
"The comments are the most vile I've seen over there." WOW, that's really saying something. I'll confess to never having been a fan of Senator Helms, but rejoicing in his death is totally repugnant to me.
With respect, and IMHO, the use of that particular word to describe a conservative like Helms is a matter of perspective. It seems to me to indicate that the speaker is self-conscious of "being out on the leading edge", is looking back at someone, and is making a value judgement about him. From the conservative's perspective, the "leading edge" is simply not the place to be. Both fall under opinion. Value judgements.
What I used to really dislike him for was his opposition to "art," deeming everything he saw as obscene.
Now, as an adult, I see he was opposing public funding of art with huge needless grants -- and that much of the art he opposed funding for was absolute crap. I disagree with him that it was "obscene" (I couldn't care a rat's ass about that aspect), but he was right to fight funding for these utterly talentless and awful modern "artists." Make what you want , but don't force me to subsidize you.
For that, I thank you Jesse, whatever other faults you may have had.
Helms was an unrepentant homophobe and had other prejudices left over from his upbringing, and these are marks against him; on the other hand, he loved his country and bent every effort to secure it. He was not a likable man, or a perfect one, but I hope he rests in peace.
re: #30 Dave the.....
Depends. Would you also have opposed a Robert Kennedy Day or a Barry Goldwater Day?
Was it just the idea of giving people a paid day off that got to you?
Did not agree with this man on a lot of things, but he did speak his mind, did not speak out of both sides of his mouth and was not IIRC a member of the Klan like that old fool from W. Vir. Suppose the kkos kidz will celebrate when Grand Kleagle Byrd shuffles off this mortal coil?
"The comments are the most vile I've seen over there." WOW, that's really saying something. I'll confess to never having been a fan of Senator Helms, but rejoicing in his death is totally repugnant to me.
Still, that "era" he was placed in seems to narrowly predate that of my parents. One historical-cultural shift I'm pretty sure of was that the "sexual revolutions" of the 60s were a violent release of those pent-up rages continuously held back in the decades preceding.
A long, long time ago, it seemed. Why he kept getting elected like his ______genarian South Carolina counterpart is still a mystery to me.
Heaven help me but, for all your prodigious intelligence and education, you're kinda' young and you've not lived as an American through the Cold War, especially the Reagan years when we had Communism on the run. Helms was a staunch ally to the forces against it.
Seems as though the HuffPo crowd needs to learn the parable about the King who forgives a debt , then on discovering the man he forgave demanded payment of a debt owed to him , calls the original debt.
Who are you to throw stones?
re: #30 Dave the.....
Depends. Would you also have opposed a Robert Kennedy Day or a Barry Goldwater Day?
Was it just the idea of giving people a paid day off that got to you?
Yep. One of the options at least one state was giving it's employees (Arizona I think) was to make a trade. Loss one of their paid days off in exchange for getting MLK off from work. Gov't employees turned it down, saying they wanted more time off.
The first major Cold War I lived through was the Oliver North scandal, go figure. As it was, I could easily imagine Helms as a staunch anti-Communist though. Animosity toward the "Reds/Pinkos" dates back past my grandparents.
Did he die today? Interesting.
Does everyone else know the story of Jefferson's death?
He and John Adams were rivals, but they reconciled in old age.
On the 50th aniversary of July 4th 1776, Thomas Jefferson died, hours apart from his old foe but dear friend.
It's one of the coolest little stories of American History that is rarely taught, ime.
I wouldn't really know about the last, but I would remark that there are distinct differences in racial attitudes among older people (call it 70 and above) depending on where they grew up. I'm sure someone did a formal survey, somewhere.
Helms was a product of time and place, as are we all.
Depends. Would you also have opposed a Robert Kennedy Day or a Barry Goldwater Day?
Was it just the idea of giving people a paid day off that got to you?
Ir's worth noting that MLK Jr is the only person to have a holiday, short of Jesus, anyway. He was a great man, but the best?
I'm not against it, but I see the point. Let's let Lincoln and Washington have their own days first, then it would be fitting.
I don't have a problem with the purchase of art for a public space, such as the bronzes of Willy Mayes at AT&T Park. I worry about commissioned art, though. Then you get a bust of Mayor Moscone with a pistol on the pedestal, to the great distress and offense of his family.
The first major Cold War I lived through was the Oliver North scandal, go figure. As it was, I could easily imagine Helms as a staunch anti-Communist though. Animosity toward the "Reds/Pinkos" dates back past my grandparents.
I live in NC. I disliked Jesse for many things. Before I understood him. I respect the man though I tend to disagree on different things he espoused. I never voted for the man.
However, lot's came from where he came from...something that liberals would excuse child molesters for, but would never forgive Jesse.
The thing about Jesse is he was the man we all want in public office. Out spoken, didn't care about polls or political correctness, didn't waiver on his fundamental beliefs. There were no secrets. He was an advocate for his beliefs. Always. And if you didn't like it, you could vote him out of office. He was not a flipper...he was a stand up guy whose beliefs were influenced by where he grew up, his cultural roots, his faith.
Maybe he was ignorant, maybe his attitudes should have changed, but in the long run he was Conservative because he felt that the government was larger then it was intended and needed to be.
RIP because he was a man that live with conviction. You don't have to agree with him to respect that. Men like him are rare anymore. Most today go with the direction of the wind.
Do you mean that we ought to celebrate their birthdays on the days they fall, rather than combining them into Presidents' Day? If so, I agree with you.
If you mean that MLK Jr is the only private citizen to have his own day, you are quite correct.
re: #84 realwest
That is possible. I remember each of their birthdays was seperate and we studied each of their lives for a week each in grade school, back in the olden days Lazardo, the 60s! Hahaha.
These posts really, really depress me. I am such a huge fan of LGF. And I have found that most folks here are on the right side when it comes to fighting radical Islam, mocking Intelligent Design, pointing out moral equivalence and racism, making fun of ignorant and hateful Communists/Socialists, their pro-Israel stance, etc... But what I can't really understand how folks think that this angry, racist jerk was so wonderful. Sure some of his theories made some sense, but his legacy IMHO is that of a race-bating, homophobic, divisive jerk.
The Conservatives that I have seen here have been tolerant and open-minded. Helms was neither. Can't we crap on the NEA and the UN and not be a huge hateful prick?
He might have been a Patriot, but not always for the right reasons. Patriotism does not equal greatness. Ask David Duke who may have shared many of the same opinions nationally and internationally. He he might be the biggest idiot in the entire country (Jimmy Carter not included). When he dies, I can guarantee that none of you will be saying "RIP".
Did anyone here this one the news today.....President Bush spoke to new Americans (as of today) at Jefferson's Monticello. At least one of the new Americans (I think) was heckling him. If that's who it was, why is this person here?
Do you mean that we ought to celebrate their birthdays on the days they fall, rather than combining them into Presidents' Day? If so, I agree with you.
If you mean that MLK Jr is the only private citizen to have his own day, you are quite correct.
What non-private citizen have their days? Washington and Lincoln have been subsumed into the generic President's day. I don't care that they are celebrated on the day, but we should be explicit that we are honoring the father of our country and the great emancipator, not just the office.
I'm not passionate about this, though, and now I wouldn't remove MLK Jr day.
No dispute here, but is MLK Day the reason why we lumped Lincoln and Washington into "Presidents Day"?
Not to my knowledge. Presidents' Day was how Lincoln is honored (it was Washington's Birthday before) and they didn't want to have 2 Federal holidays 10 days apart.
(Channelling Yogi Berra) Yes, he was one of a kind, but all those guys were the greatest. Leonardo, Rubens, Botticelli. I know next to nothing about art, but there's plenty of great work to study. Never could get into Dali.
I must respectfully disagree. Stranger in a Strange Land was consistent with his libertarian philosophy, that's all.
Probably. I didn't read all that much of his work, considering how much he put out. Glory Road is STILL on my shelf. Read it every few years. There's a decidely libertarian thread running through it.
We didn't spit on Ted Kennedy, either. We don't do that here. We won't dance on Carter's grave, even though he is crossing the line from wrong to rotten.
There is a differnce from evil men who should be wipped from the earth, and principled decent men who were occasionaly, or even frequently, or even always wrong, and should be allowed to RIP.
opps hit the wrong button. meant to hit the reply one
i am for giving gov't workers 365 days off the less they work the better we are can't do anyharm on days off.
In his early days, as a commentator on a TV station, he was racist. I don't know what he was later.
I'm talking as a Senator.
Hell, Sen. Byrd was a KKK Kleagle. And the Left forgives him now. A lot of Senators (especially of that generation) were racists in their pasts. But, as a Senator, what did Helms do that was racist?
Yes, on a certain level, I am suggesting that they are alike. I can't believe this. I really can't. Would William F Buckley or Ronald Reagan ever say such horrible things as this man did?
I don't care if he had a few pearls of wisdom. That doesn't make up for the fact that he was a hateful jaggoff.
re: #88 nikis-knight
Huh, "Martin Luther King Jr. Day was founded as a holiday promoted by labor unions in contract negotiations.[2] After King's death, Rep. John Conyers (D-Michigan) introduced a bill in Congress to make King's birthday a national holiday, highlighting King's activism on behalf of trade unionists.
The bill first came to a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives in 1979. However, it fell five votes short of the number needed for passage.[3] Two of the main arguments mentioned by opponents were that a paid holiday for federal employees would be too expensive, and that a holiday to honor a private citizen would be contrary to longstanding tradition (King had never held public office).[3]
Later, The King Center turned to support from the corporate community and the general public. The success of this strategy was cemented when musician Stevie Wonder released the single "Happy Birthday" to popularize the campaign in 1980 and hosted the Rally for Peace Press Conference in 1981. Six million signatures were collected for a petition to Congress to pass the law, termed by a 2006 The Nation article as "the largest petition in favor of an issue in US history."[2]
At the White House Rose Garden on November 2, 1983, Reagan signed a bill creating a federal holiday to honor King.[4][5] It was observed for the first time on January 20, 1986.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
And here I thought it was originally intended to honor his work in the Civil Rights Movement.
re: #100 Uncle Sticky
I guarentee you when the "Swimmer" goes to his reward, the comments here will in no way resemble the comments of the huffsters or the kos kidz.
Yes, on a certain level, I am suggesting that they are alike. I can't believe this. I really can't. Would William F Buckley or Ronald Reagan ever say such horrible things as this man did?
I don't care if he had a few pearls of wisdom. That doesn't make up for the fact that he was a hateful jaggoff.
Please cite examples of what you're talking about, so we can judge.
I don't know which blog you've been reading, but LGF is made of different stuff than Daily Kos. If you want to trash Jesse Helms there are lots of places on the web that won't have a problem with that kind of crass behavior.
I was no fan of Jesse Helms, although like zombie I've come to agree with some of his political positions. But I'm not going to tolerate the kind of crap we see going on at lefty blogs today.
We seem to push this word racist to extremes nowadays just because an idiot that HAPPENS to be black is running to ruin America, it's ok to disagree with the bastard y'all he is evil, and so are his coward followers, get a clue!
I think the hateful liberal comments that basically spit on Helms' grave shows part of the fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives. That kind of hate will send good people running the other way.
I disagreed with Senator Helms about many things, and he was sometimes given to intemperate rhetoric, but he was also a man of principle and a staunch anti-communist at a time when the leftist appeasement forces were riding high in the saddle.
I've been trying to stay away from this topic but he's made some pretty repulsive statements: Jesse Helms
I will be interested in the kos diaries when Senator Robert Byrd dies.
Since he was a member of the KKK and all.
Of course he is a dem so that makes it different.
If you read the posts many of them are noting that we disagreed with Helms on many issues but do not accept his being abused in his passing.
Was Helms a racist? The answer is probably yes. Was his racism based on a personal antipathy to blacks or was it a misguided nostalgia for the world he grew up in combined with a determination to fight the forces he saw using the cause of desegregation? Lyndon Johnson was more principled than Helms in calling for desegregation. Helms was right in seeing that the movement was going to be hijacked by socialists. The tragedy was that the conservatives in America did not see how they could get out in front on this issue and become the face of true liberation for black Americans. The result is that the black community has become enslaved to the cause of an ideology that holds them back and saps the larger nation.
re: #119 zombie zombie, I don't know if he was a racist or not (didn't live here while he was a Senator) but according to Charles link:
"Helms was accused of race-baiting throughout his career.
"To rob the Negro of his reputation of thinking through a problem in his own fashion is about the same as trying to pretend that he doesn't have a natural instinct for rhythm and for singing and dancing," he wrote in 1956, according to the AP.
In the 1996 Senate election, Helms was challenged by Democrat Harvey Gantt, the black former mayor of Charlotte, North Carolina.
Helms ran a television commercial that showed a pair of white hands crumpling a pink slip as the announcer said: "You needed that job, and you were the best qualified, but they had to give it to a minority, because of a racial quota. Is that really fair? Harvey Gantt says it is. Gantt supports Ted Kennedy's racial quota law that makes the color of your skin more important than your qualifications."
Yet, the link goes on to say:
"In later years, Helms worked with President Clinton's secretary of state, Madeleine Albright, and U2 singer Bono to fight AIDS in Africa."
So I guess I can't really answer your question, but would point out to you that "racial" politics was not considered unusual in the South for a long time (see, e.g., Sen. Robert Byrd).
I've been trying to stay away from this topic but he's made some pretty repulsive statements: Jesse Helms
OK, I'm reading through the list of notorious Helms statements. There were a few pretty bad ones in there, but many of the others either pre-dated his Senate career, or were unbelievably blunt though not necessarily factually inaccurate.
I think there is often an over the top reaction towards being classy.
But can't you understand why?
People here are trying to maintain a stark contrast to the leftist blogosphere which is filled with some of the most vile trash on earth. Absolutely vile.
I am NO fan of Kennedy, but I wished him and his family well.
I was not a fan of Helms but I'll offer my condolences to his family and leave it at that.
When Jimmy Carter dies, I will remain silent and post nothing
Like all clever politicians, Helms was a man of his times. As described in Diane McWhorter's "Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama", [Link: www.amazon.com...]
the Communist Party did attempt to infiltrate the Civil Rights movement back in the 1940s and 1950s.
It was not irrational to link the two at that time. That the linkage played into the hands of conservatives like Helms is an inconvenient truth. Martin Luther King, Jr. was not a communist, but many of his positions on social justice were liberal, at least for those times. They now have become mainstream.
Helms showed his political skills in sidestepping the earlier unpleasantness, switched parties, and becoming a national conservative leader. Whatever else he may have been, he was no hypocrite, and on many issues, he was right.
The kind, loving liberal folk of the Suicide Girls "current events" board are throwing a party. For obvious reasons (NSFW) I won't link it, but they're no better than the KOS losers.
re: #156 pre-Boomer Marine brat
I was on the Coville Indian Reservation yesterday and got some illeagal firecrackers but resisted the urge to buy rockets because the fire danger here is so high. That said I will go back up for New Years! Can shoot rockets then with no fear of fire, snow doncha know.
Yes, that racial quotas ad is frequently cited as an example of his racism during his Senate career. But, although it was unbelievably blunt and tactless, it wasn't factually wrong: the whole point behind racial quotas in hiring is to give the jobs to people based on their ethnic background as opposed to their race-neutral qualifications. So, while the ad was intentionally exacerbating racial tensions, it wasn't an out-and-out racist lie.
Okay, your point is noted. You did not like the man.
All that others here are trying to say is, agree or disagree with his viewpoint, but he does have a family and people who love him as a person. It is not your place to judge him.
I was on the Coville Indian Reservation yesterday and got some illeagal firecrackers but resisted the urge to buy rockets because the fire danger here is so high. That said I will go back up for New Years! Can shoot rockets then with no fear of fire, snow doncha know.
The kind, loving liberal folk of the Suicide Girls "current events" board are throwing a party. For obvious reasons (NSFW) I won't link it, but they're no better than the KOS losers.
At least you aren't embarrassed to admit you are a registered member of Suicide Girls!
of normal men i feel it is wrong to speak ill of the dead and what ever faults jesse had he was a normal man. You have to be pure evil before i think it is ok to say ill of the dead, lenin, mao, snicklegruber, che, saddam, pol pot are the sort that one would be commanded to speak ill of after they are dead or in the case of castro and the short shit of iran when they are alive.
OK, I'm reading through the list of notorious Helms statements. There were a few pretty bad ones in there, but many of the others either pre-dated his Senate career, or were unbelievably blunt though not necessarily factually inaccurate.
There's a reason we have the term "politically incorrect".
I trust wiki about as far as I could throw Rosie O'hosehead.
Wikipedia does have an agenda, one which would not be expected to shine a positive light on the controversies of a long-running conservative senator from the south.
RIP, Jesse. Unlike most democrats he died at home and not in OFFICE. Which begs the question why do democrats die in OFFICE? Democrats never seem to leave under any circumstances other than the Grim Reaper calling.
RIP, Jesse. Unlike most democrats he died at home and not in OFFICE. Which begs the question why do democrats die in OFFICE? Democrats never seem to leave under any circumstances other than the Grim Reaper calling.
Somehow, I think it would be a shock to the nation and the world if Ted Kennedy actually retired from the Senate. Of course I'm not holding my breath, but hey, it could happen.
The thing to remember about Helm's is this comment from his memoir:
"that there is no sense in being in office if you don't have the courage to do what is right, even if it is the most unpopular position in the world."
Helm's was completely correct that the way affirmative action and other government programs were handled would result in failure _and_ huge deficits. Unfortunately because he, and others like him, were perceived/portrayed as racists the race card was established as a means of ending entitlement programs which enslave millions of Americans.
RIP, Jesse. Unlike most democrats he died at home and not in OFFICE. Which begs the question why do democrats die in OFFICE? Democrats never seem to leave under any circumstances other than the Grim Reaper calling.
Back in the old days (for me) the question would be why do members of the Soviet Politburo die in office?
It was claimed that the boys, from a year seven class of 11 and 12-year-olds, were given detention after refusing to take part in a practical demonstration of how Allah is worshipped.
Yesterday parents accused the school of breaching their human rights by forcing them to take part in the exercise.
re: #167 zombie No argument from me; as I said, I can't say whether or not he was a racist.
All I can say is what my Mom always tells me: If you can't say something good about someone, don't say anything at all."
And frankly it pisses me off that some of the comments here (not yours) resemble the kinds of things I'd expect from the "people" at KOS or HuffPoo.
And since this IS Independence Day, I would kindly ask Charles for another thread.
Good riddance
America's gain is hell's loss.
posted by webloon
The devil claims one of his own.
posted by shockdaddyd
Sympathy for the Devil
The world is a better place. This man was so vile that he made george bush jr and dick cheney look like human beings. I feel sorry for Satan to be saddled with Helmes and Hitler, Cheney and Bush. I never thought I'd ever have sympathy for the Devil
posted by expression451
Proof only the good die young
Too bad he and his kind didn't die long ago.
posted by ronasch
Because they didn't dare retire. Even after Molotov was forced out, and survived it, they worried about their fate if they weren't there to keep an eye on their colleagues.
Why not? I celebrate the ability to be judgmental. "Don't be judgmental" is the philosophical underpinning of multiculturalism. I can make judgments and am better off for it. Indeed, I would say that the overwhelming majority of the posters here are judgmental and routinely express their judgments in their posts. See, for example, #170 ("the unbelievably slimy Dick Morris"), which just happens to be the last post on my screen as I am typing.
I sure hope they have grounds in Britain to sue. If I was one of their parents I'd be so proud I could bust that they had enough sense to ignore this terrible stupid assignment.
The Lefty quotes prove yet again what a cesspool of "thought" these dregs drink from. They are nothing but haters of what is right and good with our world. They want nothing but to subjugate our freedoms and negate the real progress and differences the United States of America has made in this world, over the past 232 years.
They hate this country so much, it's really tough sometimes to wrap my head around these bastards.
i started out as a marxist trotskyite commie but i never was a democrat. never was a liberal eather as i felt back then it was the liberals who left the room when the fight started. When i could no longer stand the anti semitism of the left i jumped over the libs. as soft leftism made no logical sence to me. I never liked the real fascist right though so mostly i am a libertarian who isn't a isolationist. so there is no party i am completly at home in the current gop will have to do.
Moral judgment is a moral necessity. When someone says, don't be judgmental", he's saying in effect, "drop dead."
When someone tells me that, I tell them to fornicate themselves in an impossible manner, then ask them if jury trials should be banned...after all, someone IS being judged!
That's insane. Is the teacher having them recite the shahada?
Even though I think it is meaningless gobbety-goop, I don't say the shahada, except for parodies of it. Too many people have had their necks stretched/severed for saying those vile words in jest.
"The headteacher contacted the authority immediately complaints were received. Enquiries are being made into the circumstances as a matter of urgency and all parents will be informed accordingly.
"Educating children in the beliefs of different faiths is part of Cheshire's diversity curriculum on the basis that knowledge is, of course, is essential to understanding.
"We accept that such teaching has to be conducted with commonsense and sensitivity."
Wikipedia does have an agenda, one which would not be expected to shine a positive light on the controversies of a long-running conservative senator from the south.
I was just there and under "celebrations" they annopunce that Helms' death will be celebrated with fireworks on the mall in DC....nice. Who polices wiki?
Here's the problem with saying it in front of witnesses:
"Reciting this statement three times in front of witnesses is all that anyone need do to become a Muslim." [Link: www.bbc.co.uk...]
This is why prayer must never be allowed in school, there's no guarantee the god being worshiped will be yours.
Its stuff like this that make me grateful to be an American.
Anyways, Happy 4th everybody!
This is why I think public schools ought to avoid anything more than teaching bare facts about religions.
This is also why I think that it is good for there to be schools (Islam and other wacky death cults may be exceptions) with clearly defined religious orientation for people who want there children reared in some religious environment.
i am seeing more muslim bag ladies in my part of chicago, wonder when the jews will start being attacked by the muslim scum. soon i am worried about it as the ortho still live in this part of chicago.
Here's the problem with saying it in front of witnesses:
"Reciting this statement three times in front of witnesses is all that anyone need do to become a Muslim." [Link: www.bbc.co.uk...]
I have no problem with private religious schools as long as they receive no public funding. I don't want my tax dollars being used to fund a religion I don't believe in, or even one I do believe in for that matter.
I was just there and under "celebrations" they annopunce that Helms' death will be celebrated with fireworks on the mall in DC....nice. Who polices wiki?
I believe that we are all entitled to our opinions; but, I am not sure that opinions are the same as judgments.
My point to the poster was that I understood that he did not like Sen. Helms for whatever reasons. That is fine, but when we start acting like judge and jury due to our opinions, then we are setting ourselves above others.
I'm beginning to distrust the Daily Mail a bit on these kinds of stories; I don't think they always tell the whole tale. Searched news and didn't find any other articles about it; I'd like to see it from another source.
Outrageous! Absolutely wrong in every way possible. How dare they tell a child who to pray to, even if it was supposedly 'pretend', or a class assignment.
And to discipline the children who refused to bow down to the moon god? Oh, HELL no.
And good on those boys for standing up and saying "NO".
"I believe that we are all entitled to our opinions; but, I am not sure that opinions are the same as judgments."
I agree that there is a difference between a mere opinion and a judgment. Opinions are cheap; judgments imply reasoning. And, yes, sometimes we do set ourselves above others through our judgments. As The Other Les said, it is a moral necessity to be able to do so.
If it makes you feel better, my checking account went down to $1.96 before I deposited my last paycheck.
Yikes! I feel your pain, my friend. Things are just too bloody expensive in Ottawa and with the bio-fuel crapola and rapidly rising fuel costs, consumer goods prices are sky-rocketing.
I pay over $3.00 for a lousy loaf of whole wheat bread. Up from last week by 20%
I have no problem with private religious schools as long as they receive no public funding. I don't want my tax dollars being used to fund a religion I don't believe in, or even one I do believe in for that matter.
I'm not against vouchers to be used at the school of one's choice, but I think that any form of direct funding would be is unconstitutional.
The comments on KOS and SFGATE are a stark reminder of why I choose not to associate with venomous "progressives" and Democrats. Jesse was a product of his times, believed strongly in what he did, and took his lumps. He was right about so much, including staunchly opposing Communists, especially in our own government, where they do the most harm. He could not help it if those same communists often took the form of a now "protected class" of citizens, of whom we must all fall in to line and not criticize, lest we be called names, like racists or homophobes. Tolerance of these same communists has brought us the Black Panthers, the SDS, the Weathermen, Piss Christ, the Mapplethorpe wing of the Guggenheim, the Black National Anthem, Affirmative Action, a permanent welfare state that has all but destroyed the black family, a Slave Reparations Act that appears annually like a weed in the House (but not THIS year, oddly), Black Pride month, (in which we learn that no whites ever fought in WWII, all whites are slave holders, and that whites are devils, to be reviled), and the Rev. "God Damn America" Wright.
Are we now better for having these things, in which we, the citizen taxpayer, pay for our own official vilification to the neo-segregationists?
Will they get better or worse under President Obama?
Folks, this is about to get interesting. I suggest you all pay attention, I know this batch of Lizards certainly is. Payback is what a lot of Obama's base is all about, and they've got it in their reach.
Jesse Helms was a man who grew up at a time when prejudice wasn't just acceptable - it was almost necessary for men like him - politicians who needed votes. I got the feeling that he struggled mightily with the prejudices that were taught to him and had, to a great degree, overcome them. He wasn't perfect, but who is? He loved his country and I've heard many tales of his charity to individuals. RIP.
Would the vouchers be good for both secular and religious private schools. In that case, I could go along with that.
As for Senator Helms, he became a strong supporter of Israel later in his career and for that I thank him. Whatever may be said of his beliefs, it should be noted that he never acted on them, unlike some other Senators who shall remain nameless. Cough *Byrd* cough.
"It's not reason that is at the heart of modern-day liberalism but rather the claim to superior virtue and, even more important, to a special knowledge unavailable to the unwashed or unenlightened."
1 box German Chocolate Cake
3/4 cup melted butter (1.5 sticks)
1/3, 1/2 cup evaporated milk, divided
1 cup chopped pecans
1 cup semi-sweet chocolate morsels
1 14oz package caramels
In a large mixing bowl, combine cake mix (I prefer Pillsbury), butter, 1/3 cup evaporated milk, and pecans. Press 1/2 of the mixture into the bottom of a greased 13X9X2 inch glass baking dish. Bake at 350 degrees for 8 minutes.
In a double boiler, combine 1/2 cup evaporated milk and caramels. When melted and well-mixed, pour over half-baked portion of mixture (pour gently, as the bottom isn't fully set and it will part like the Red Sea if you aren't careful). Add the cup of semi-sweet chocolate morsels. Put remainder of mixture into baking dish (you just kind of have to set little pieces on top). Return to oven, bake 18 minutes at 350.
I'm beginning to distrust the Daily Mail a bit on these kinds of stories; I don't think they always tell the whole tale. Searched news and didn't find any other articles about it; I'd like to see it from another source.
The comments on KOS and SFGATE are a stark reminder of why I choose not to associate with venomous "progressives" and Democrats. Jesse was a product of his times, believed strongly in what he did, and took his lumps. He was right about so much, including staunchly opposing Communists, especially in our own government, where they do the most harm. He could not help it if those same communists often took the form of a now "protected class" of citizens, of whom we must all fall in to line and not criticize, lest we be called names, like racists or homophobes. Tolerance of these same communists has brought us the Black Panthers, the SDS, the Weathermen, Piss Christ, the Mapplethorpe wing of the Guggenheim, the Black National Anthem, Affirmative Action, a permanent welfare state that has all but destroyed the black family, a Slave Reparations Act that appears annually like a weed in the House (but not THIS year, oddly), Black Pride month, (in which we learn that no whites ever fought in WWII, all whites are slave holders, and that whites are devils, to be reviled), and the Rev. "God Damn America" Wright.
Are we now better for having these things, in which we, the citizen taxpayer, pay for our own official vilification to the neo-segregationists?
Will they get better or worse under President Obama?
Folks, this is about to get interesting. I suggest you all pay attention, I know this batch of Lizards certainly is. Payback is what a lot of Obama's base is all about, and they've got it in their reach.
Good morning rawmuse, now that was a mouthful and well said to boot...
Quite welcome. They are great to take to parties...
That makes you the life of the party then. :D When I visited 'Nam Grunt in Texas, he asked my Hostess, Miss Marlene, to make sure I got her brownies to take back to Canada. Those were amazing and I thought I had died and gone to heaven.
To be honest, I was not that great a fan of Helms, and my husband wasn't either when he lived in NC. But the Dems in NC would always run some tobacco-hatin' somewhere-to-the-left-of-Karl-Marx inner city liberal against him, and my husband would end up voting Helms anyway.
Helms did a lot for the movement, and I am sorry to see him go.
Ir's worth noting that MLK Jr is the only person to have a holiday, short of Jesus, anyway. He was a great man, but the best?
I'm not against it, but I see the point. Let's let Lincoln and Washington have their own days first, then it would be fitting.
When I was but a wee small lad, we got both days off school. Now they call it 'President's Day.'
Well, Michelangelo was commissioned to paint the Sistine Chapel ceiling. That came from taxes so I'm not sure that art shoudn't be subsidized.
Hmm, that's not true. Michelangelo was commissioned by the Pope to paint the ceiling. It came out of church coffers so I wouldn't call that tax money. I would say that like the Medici family, who sponsored a great portion of the Renaissance artists and works of art, the church was a patron.
I'm not sure where you got your art history lessons, but that is not what I was taught while studying the masters.
Terrorist supporter?
And you base that on what?
And what does Gmail have to do with anything?
That's my primary account.
And I registered here long ago.
You're welcome to start making sense at any time.
What I used to really dislike him for was his opposition to "art," deeming everything he saw as obscene.
Now, as an adult, I see he was opposing public funding of art with huge needless grants -- and that much of the art he opposed funding for was absolute crap. I disagree with him that it was "obscene" (I couldn't care a rat's ass about that aspect), but he was right to fight funding for these utterly talentless and awful modern "artists." Make what you want , but don't force me to subsidize you.
For that, I thank you Jesse, whatever other faults you may have had.
Well, and don't you think that maybe some of your opinion at the time might have been due to an undue influence from your public education, and a as yet undeveloped ability to spot Liberal bias in the news and from members of the teachers union?
Same thing goes for Helms's opposition to to certain issues such as gay rights, AIDs Funding or a MLK day.
Lot of people here mocking the man as a Southern Racist, when the guy left the DNC over their position and handling of the Civil Rights Act. As you will recall it was the DNC opposing LBJ on the 1965 Civil Rights Act.
The fact is, he was not a racist, but opposed and took positions on issues based on Conservativism. Just as in your example above, his position was not based on what art was, but rather that we shouldn't be required to pay for it.
The Liberal Socialist Democrat Left likes to paint everyone against them as a Racist, Fascist, this or that. The Kos Kidz are already equating Helms with Hitler and Stalin of all people.
They did the same to guys like Barry Goldwater who opposed the Civil Rights Act and things like Gay Rights on Conservative Constitutional grounds and made great augments in doing so. But today in school, we are just taught that they were white southern racist throw backs to an earlier age, when that that really wasn't true at all.
Unfortunately we don't get to learn much of what's real and true until we are adults and look the carefully crafted screen of Liberal Socialist text books and MSM.
Zombie you took the time to analyze the art issue with Helms, because it's of personal interest to you. And you found out, on the other side that Helm's had a valid point, and here you'd damn near been brainwashed into hating him and everything he stood for over that issue. That is till you took the time to really look at the issue without the fog of having people tell you what to think.
I'd just suggest that we all take the time to look at the other side of some of those other issues as well. And at the start realizing the Liberal Socialist Left lies about absolutely everything including their own names, and that absolutely everyone that is ideologically opposed to them is labeled and smeared as a racist nazi homophobe by default. Knowing that, maybe we should take a step back and really look at these men's stated reasons, rather than rely on the Liberal Socialist America Hating Democrat Left's opinions, bias, and irrational hatred.
The reason they, and many others were opposed to "special rights" and "special protections" had nothing to do with racism or hatred on their part; but it is evident in your famous photographs and photo-journalism.
When it comes to using reductio ad absurdum to get the point across, which is a valid logical method, Godwin is suspended.
Especially when one is discussing racists such as Helms.
That's not an excuse.
It's an explanation made necessary by your lack of mental acumen.
Enough fun playing with you folks.
I'm going back to Kos, where the patriots are, as opposed to you hate-filled fascist idiots.
Kiss kiss.
As much as I hate seeing people banned, this is your site, and it is your reputation at stake, and quite honestly I was wondering how much longer you would tolerate that nonsense.
"(I decided to) stay to the right of the president's right and make it easier for Reagan to be Reagan," - Jesse Helms
"It has always been my contention," he wrote in his memoir, "that there is no sense in being in office if you don't have the courage to do what is right, even if it is the most unpopular position in the world." - Jesse Helms
I wish John McCain would learn that. Not to mention the entire RNC Leadership.
"I was a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution. See!"
McCain on Conservativism.
John McCain a Conservative , my blue swollen left .....
Foot soldier, John? Well guys like Jesse Helms were leading the charge from the front, before Ronald Reagan ever got there. So I guess that'd make him a General to your foot, huh John, you treasonous bastard.
Say what you like about the likes of Jesse Helms, Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, Strom Thurmond, and the like, but at least they didn't reach across the isle to help John Kerry and Bill Clinton commit treason and sell out the estimated 10,000 POW/MIA's we left behind in Vietnam, held as political hostage bargaining chips with the Commies, sentencing them to death for the political expediency of Bill Clinton living up to just one campaign promises so he could fast track normalization of relations with John Kerry's friend in Hanoi, like you did, John.
I'm going to clarify this again, because it hasn't reached everyone, apparently -- I was no fan of Jesse Helms. I disagreed with a lot of what he said and did, and it's not without evidence to say that he had bigoted views.
I just don't believe in trashing the recently dead for political reasons. And if you've noticed, I've been consistent with this across political lines.
But what I can't really understand how folks think that this angry, racist jerk was so wonderful. Sure some of his theories made some sense, but his legacy IMHO is that of a race-baiting, homophobic, divisive jerk.
The Conservatives that I have seen here have been tolerant and open-minded. Helms was neither. Can't we crap on the NEA and the UN and not be a huge hateful prick?
He might have been a Patriot, but not always for the right reasons.
Word up (and up-ding!) to Uncle Sticky.
It's possible to oppose affirmative action without appealing to resentful whites who are all too eager to believe that "n*ggers get a free ride from the gummint!"
It's possible to be against adding "sexual orientation" to already cumbersome anti-discrimination laws without playing on irrational fears of a Militant Homosexual Agenda that aims to jail Christians and seduce their children.
It's possible to vote against the creation of yet another paid federal holiday on the simple grounds that its wasteful, without gratuitous character smears of the dude that the proposed holiday is honoring.
But Helms had a track record of taking the low road.
Finally, what's up with all the "he was a product of his time and place" excuse-making for Helms' personal prejudices? I understand that elderly people who are actually suffering from clinical dementia need to be given a pass if they say disgusting things, but it seems to me that if a man has the mental competence to hold public office, then he also has the competence to review, reconsider, and possibly repudiate some of his previously held opinions.
And to cut Helms excessive slack for his sometimes malicious spirit, simply because he was older than dirt, is to apply "the soft bigotry of low expectations" to senior citizens.
As to the Kos comments, it seems to me that the left has not improved on their decorum since the Wellstone funeral. In fact, I believe that example has hastened the exhibition of their fundamental lack of respect for fellow man, living or dead.
It's possible to oppose affirmative action without appealing to resentful whites who are all too eager to believe that "n*ggers get a free ride from the gummint!"
It's possible to be against adding "sexual orientation" to already cumbersome anti-discrimination laws without playing on irrational fears of a Militant Homosexual Agenda that aims to jail Christians and seduce their children.
It's possible to vote against the creation of yet another paid federal holiday on the simple grounds that its wasteful, without gratuitous character smears of the dude that the proposed holiday is honoring.
Yes, it is possible, but such a person was not on the ballot.
I can somewhat forgive the Kos Kidz their glee -- that bottle of champagne's already chilling for the day that corrupt old f*%k Robert Byrd breathes his last breath. Nonetheless, I do imagine I'll refrain from taking to the internet to dance on his grave.
Finally, what's up with all the "he was a product of his time and place" excuse-making for Helms' personal prejudices? ........ "the soft bigotry of low expectations".
I agree, I have the same criticism with those who use those reasons to support to Sen. Byrd. The, "product of his time" mantra is only an explanation, it is not an excuse.
I also agree with Charles that dancing on graves is just wrong.
Excellent point. You go to Congress--or to the White House--with the candidates you have.
Each voter has this image of a Perfect Candidate in his or her mind. Then, as Election Day nears, you trot in to the booth with that image in rags and do your best with what you have.
Finally, what's up with all the "he was a product of his time and place" excuse-making for Helms' personal prejudices?........the soft bigotry of low expectations
I agree, Sen. Byrd is often defended that way, and it passes as an explanation, but not an excuse.
I also agree with Charles, dancing on graves is wrong (with certain exceptions as CJ notes).
I heard Bob Dole on FOX News calling Helms the last of the old conservatives and he says Ted Kennedy is the last of the old liberals. Of course some people say the old liberals were the Whigs who started the Republican Party, I think I get his point.
Yes, it is possible, but such a person was not on the ballot.
Yep, that's true.
It has occurred to me that in a way, Helms provided a useful public service in being an overt bigot on certain issues -- he gave other conservatives a benchmark to avoid.
(And I think Helms himself might've partly agreed with me on this, except for the "overt bigot" description -- in his own words, by being to the right of Reagan's right, he helped make room for Reagan to be Reagan.)
Yes, it is. There were no Federal holiday in January, other than New Year's Day. February had two Federal holidays, which were Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays. The powers-that-be wanted an MLK holiday, which would make four in the span of seven weeks. So, the generic "President's Day" was created so that there still was one Federal Holiday in February, and that "extra" day in Feb was made MLK Day in January.
Wow, that Kestral fucktard was registered for over a year and posted only 13 comments before getting banished! he is one of those troll dickheads that lives for topics like this. Fortunately, his type does not live long here, suffocating in the rarified atmosphere of TRUTH that is Lizardland!
In a moment of masochism, I went to one of the KOS threads to see whether anyone would try to blame gay male AIDS deaths on Helms simply because Helms happened to be famously homophobic. The KOS kids did not, uh, "disappoint."
(HIV is, of course, a not-very-contagious STD that was able to reach epidemic levels among homo/bi men almost entirely via transmission during consensual anal sex -- not via fellatio except in rare cases, not via handjobs, not via guys French-kissing each other, not via solo wanking to gay pr0n, and certainly not as a result of "hate speech" from a cranky old Senator.)
Mrs. least has Fox News as her home page, so when she first logged in today, she said, "Jesse Helms has died. Who was he?" (as I've mentioned before, she's very apolitical)
I immediately thought to myself, "The moonbats will be going wild." (I ain't no rocket scientist, but I knows my opposites)
KKKomment from a Kossack:
Well! If my atheistic prayers are answered, Jesse Helms won't be spending eternity where he expected to spend it.
This is the type of smack that just really chaps my hide.
The non-logic is astounding -- but I do have to consider the source.
1) If there's no supernatural, why do atheists almost always claim to pray?
2) And if there's no supernatural, to whom (or what) are they praying to?
Bear this in mind: The toxic comments many lefties make about anyone they hate who dies speaks more about them than about the person in question. They're so insecure about their own beliefs that they feel the need to tear others down in order to feel better about themselves.
That said, I had no strong feelings one way or another about Sen. Helms. To me, he was just kinda there.
Bear this in mind: The toxic comments many lefties make about anyone they hate who dies speaks more about them than about the person in question. They're so insecure about their own beliefs that they feel the need to tear others down in order to feel better about themselves.
And these are the people who say everything is relative, their is no right and wrong, we shouldn't judge.
Well! If my atheistic prayers are answered, Jesse Helms won't be spending eternity where he expected to spend it.
The non-logic is astounding -- but I do have to consider the source.
1) If there's no supernatural, why do atheists almost always claim to pray?
I can't believe I'm going to defend a KosKid on even a small point, but: It was a joke, son. (I mean, the part about praying and the part about believing that Helms or anyone else has an immortal soul was a joke. The venom directed against Helms was, I assume, fully sincere.)
On the other hand, I think it's silly and illogical for atheists to get upset if a Christian says "You are going to Hell because you don't believe in Jesus."
And plenty of self-proclaimed atheists DO get earnestly, non-jokingly upset when informed that they're going to spend their non-existent afterlife in an imaginary realm of fire and torment, because a god they don't believe in has decreed it so. And that's pretty dumb of them.
And you know this was a joke, how?
Severe cases of moonbat cranio-rectal inversion lead to a zealotry that has a humor factor of zero (or less).
As to the last part of your post, I agree.
However . . . some supposed Christians say "You're going to hell" and suchlike with an attitude that approaches glee.
G-d has reserved that sort of pronouncement for Himself-- we don't get to do that. Good thing, too - the world'd be vewy, vewy quiet, 'cause it'd be vewy, vewy empty if we had that sort of power.
Seeing bad things should evoke sadness and prayer, not fire and brimstone.
I won't dance on Ted Kennedy's grave when he finally passes. Nor do I have an ounce of respect for any KosKid that gets a moment of release from their misery for doing such a thing in the wake of Jesse Helms' passing. Mom and Dad raised me better than that.
Before it's used as an extra bludgon against him, recall that MKL, Jr. day is an anomoly for American Holidays.
American holidays include:
Columbus Day (popular discoverer of America/Italian/discovery of America)
Presidents Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Memorial Day
Christmas Day
New Years Day
Flag Day
MLK Day was contriversial not just for racial reasons, but becasue of the scope of declaring a National holiday for just one man who had died barely a decade earlier. and was never elected to any office or served any national position.
I had the honor of voting for Senator Helms twice. I wrote him for an autographed picture, which his office promptly sent. Wrote to him about issues of the day and always got a thoughtful reply. The autographed pic hangs on my office wall, which has pissed off a goodly number of co-workers over the years.
Before it's used as an extra bludgon against him, recall that MKL, Jr. day is an anomoly for American Holidays.
American holidays include:
Columbus Day (popular discoverer of America/Italian/discovery of America)
Presidents Day
Independence Day
Actually, that is not correct. Presidents' Day has never been made an Federal Holiday, although many states have enacted it. Washington's Birthday remains a Federal Holiday.
Even Abraham Lincoln's birthday was never a Federal Holiday, although again, it is observed in several states.
It's amazing to see just how pervasive the characterizations of Senator Helms' positions actually are - to the point that even those who agree with his positions, on principle, if not his style, are willing to go along with sliming the man - based mostly on the apparent universality of the opinion.
I'll say that Jesse Helms quite often, through sheer bluntness, was downright annoying to me. However, as has been mentioned numerous times in this thread, when the reasons for his opposition to various Democratic schemes is dissected, the actual reason is quite logical, and in line with basic conservative principles. Smaller government, with a less intrusion into people's lives. Opposition to programs and activities the government, from a conservative viewpoint, has no business being involved with.
It's amusing to see the analogy of the 'Piss Christ' and Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel - and to see the discarding of the similarity of 'public funding' for the arts, because the RC Church never had taxation authority. I'd counter that with telling every Catholic, at a time when the power of the Church was far, far greater than it is today, that they were greasing the skids to send their souls to hell if they didn't pony up their tithes as pretty darned close to a tax. Still, the larger disconnect in the example is that Michelangelo was hired specifically to create something the Church wanted to buy, in a style they expected, as opposed to the various artists that were being paid from the taxpayer's pocket simply to create whatever they wanted to, with those things often so obtuse that a substantial percentage of those taxpayers wouldn't find anything other than offensive.
It's also odd to see his campaign ad brought up, with the clear point being that race should have absolutely no bearing in a hiring (or firing) decision be used as a cudgel to point out Helms' racism. Does that make Ward Connerly a racist? He's after basically the same thing - no preferences or set-asides, or quotas based on race. Colorblindness, as a matter of fact.
As I mentioned, there are valid critiques of Senator Helms, but the vast majority of the crap that was slung at him by the lefties that couldn't buffalo him or get him to back off of his principles really don't fall into that category, and it's kind of annoying to see another example of 'tell a lie enough times, and people begin to accept it as truth' - possibly without people even realizing it.
So what was my big beef with Jesse Helms? The way he was played, like a fine tuned Stradivarius, by Fidel Castro. Jesse was a well that never, ever ran dry for what Fidel needed - a blunt force comment from some gringo to use to show people how the big, bad NorteAmericanos were out to get his cigar smoking bearded butt (and by extension, the Isla de Cuba). This however, is a difference of style, not substance. I wholeheartedly agree with Jesse Helms that Castro was, and is a communist bastage sorely in need of removal from a position to inflict misery on the Cuban people. The difference is that it seemed obvious to me that most of the things Jesse did actually strengthened Castro's political position and security. But then, I've always wondered why in the hell Cuba has not been treated to the same strategy that helped open Eastern Europe and hasten the downfall of the Soviet Union - primarily through engagement, and allowing people to actually see, meet, and interact with Americans. The most positive ambassadors and political activists this country can field are Marge and Herb from Des Moines on a sightseeing vacation. The LAST thing the Cuban government would like to see would be a complete and total lifting of the trade and travel restrictions to Cuba. Because within a matter of months (not years) the influx of capital, (true, some going into commie pockets, but quite a bit not), and having enough average, regular 'Merkins loose and dispelling years and years of propaganda hogwash - then, well, the Fidelistas would have a HUGE problem on their hands at that point.
all THAT being said - RIP Jesse Helms - a man who took principled stands, and very often irritated the daylights out his liberal colleagues in the process. He must have been doing SOMETHING right to get them so pissed they're lining up to spit on his grave.
I heard Bob Dole on FOX News calling Helms the last of the old conservatives and he says Ted Kennedy is the last of the old liberals. Of course some people say the old liberals were the Whigs who started the Republican Party, I think I get his point.
Indeed. As a young person, I find both their views and philosophies very strange and extreme.
RIP, I wish his family the best in a difficult time.
I logged on yesterday, MSN is my homepage. In the rush to report Helms death they garbled the headline, it read for a short time, "Former Sen. Jesse Helms dies at 86 (repeat several times) falseRepublican known as 'Senator No', than falsefalse is repeated again at the end. I'd like to know what they meant by false republican.
I am not and never was a fan of Jesse Helms. I thought it best to wait 24 hours and think about it before I went for a piss on his grave. I must be getting older and wiser because now a day later I'm wondering if he was really as bad and nasty as I once believed him to be. There must have been some things I would have liked about the man had I known him personally. I'd like to believe there is something in everyone that is of quality. So, while I don't think I will be in mourning, I think I'll wait a few days and look deeper before I tread on his passing. No reason to not be respectful for how his family might feel.
The KosKids and their ilk are making much of the claim the Jesse Helms was "racist."
What evidence is there for this? It is a valid claim?
And no, I don't think opposing a public holiday for Martin Luther King makes one a racist. I also think it's an absurd mistake of a holiday.
Aside from that, in what way was Helms racist? Let's look at it objectively.
Well, yes he was! By the way, this is the first LGF post I have ever down dinged.
Helms commented on the 1963 Civil Rights protests, "The Negro cannot count forever on the kind of restraint that's thus far left him free to clog the streets, disrupt traffic, and interfere with other men's rights."
He also wrote, "Crime rates and irresponsibility among Negroes are a fact of life which must be faced."
Helms worked on the unsuccessful 1960 Democratic primary gubernatorial campaign of I. Beverly Lake, Sr., who ran as a supporter of racial segregation. Lake was defeated by Terry Sanford, who ran as a racial moderate willing to implement the federal government's policy of school integration. (all from his Wikipedia, with sources)
On other issues:
Having attempted, and failed, to block passage of the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Care (CARE) Act passed in 1990, Helms tried to block its refunding in 1995, saying that those with AIDS were responsible for the disease, because they had contracted it because of their "deliberate, disgusting, revolting conduct", and falsely claiming that more federal dollars were spent on AIDS than heart disease or cancer.
Helms was "bitterly opposed to federal financing of AIDS research and treatment". Opposing the Kennedy-Hatch AIDS bill in 1988, Helms stated, "There is not one single case of AIDS in this country that cannot be traced in origin to sodomy." When Ryan White died in 1990, his mother went to Congress to speak to politicians on behalf of people with AIDS. She spoke to 23 representatives: Helms refused to speak to her even when she was alone with him in an elevator. Despite opposition by Helms, the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Care (CARE) Act passed in 1990.
No "R.I.P" from me.... Can't say the world has lost anything from his death.
I never said they were! So there are many black and latino racists! So what! There are racists among every race. That doesn't change the fact that this particular guy was a racist.
If there is nothing good worth saying about the man, then let's not say anything at all. Let's not airbrush him postmortem.
The Kos Kids are typical of the left -- if you disagree with them politically, you are evil. Not just misguided, wrong, or even stupid, but positively evil. Someone said that there was nasty stuff said by right wingers when Paul Wellstone died (I don't remember that sort of nastiness), and that the lefties thought that was horrible, so why isn't it horrible now? The answer? Because Wellstone was good, and Helms was evil. They really believe that people who disagree with them are evil.
I'd make a strong differentiation between the "taxes" the pope had available to him and the National Endowment for the Arts and their grants from the US Federal govt.