LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

Terror-Linked Subway Imam Promotes Islamic Creationism

Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:04:40 pm PDT

As we noted yesterday, Imam Siraj Wahhaj (named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing) is planning a series of subway train advertisements in Manhattan—during September—proselytizing for Islam.

The organization behind this effort runs the web site whyislam.org, and featured prominently on their homepage we find: The Collapse of Darwinism. Clicking the image on their page (not here) brings you to an expensively produced presentation by Harun Yahya, the Turkish creationist whose organizations have collaborated with US groups like the Institute for Creation Research.

(Hat tip: LGF readers.)

Advertisement

519 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 paint-right  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:06:05pm

keep them OUT

2 A Kiwi Infidel  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:06:49pm

First, aallaa he roll out the big carpet, and that is why the earth is flat.

Stop laughing, uckmid, I cutta offa ya head.

3 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:06:56pm

The circle is unbroken.

/that wasn't the circle I was taught about

4 A Kiwi Infidel  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:07:29pm

And, as Forrest Gump said, that is all I gotta say about dat.

5 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:08:45pm

I think it's only natural that a die-hard islamist would support the rejection of reason and logic. Exposing muslims to reason and logic is a bit counterproductive for islam.

6 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:10:26pm

re: #5 Sharmuta

I think it's only natural that a die-hard islamist would support the rejection of reason and logic. Exposing muslims to reason and logic is a bit counterproductive for islam.

That is one of the greater understatements I've heard in a long time.

7 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:12:12pm

Reality check again:

Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, recently restated his (and Pope John Paul's) argument. As MSNBC reported, Pope Benedict has referred to the debate between creationists and supporters of evolutionary theory as an "absurdity":
"They are presented as alternatives that exclude each other," the pope said. "This clash is an absurdity because on one hand there is much scientific proof in favor of evolution, which appears as a reality that we must see and which enriches our understanding of life and being as such."
On the other hand, there are certain questions that evolutionary theory can never answer: "Above all it does not answer the great philosophical question, 'Where does everything come from?'" Christians, thus, can learn truth from science, but scientists must learn to accept the limits of their own work.
No scientific investigation can ever prove that God does not exist, or that He did not create the world, or even that man is only the sum of his physical parts.

Link

8 george slivers  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:12:19pm

Islamic terrorists are bad people
Islamic terrorists tend to be creationists

Ergo! Creationists are bad people!

You kids are so brilliant.

9 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:12:19pm

re: #6 pre-Boomer Marine brat

That is one of the greater understatements I've heard in a long time.

You can say that again!
That is one of the greater understatements I've heard in a long time.
You can say that again!
That is one of the greater understatements I've heard in a long time.
You.....

10 paint-right  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:12:23pm

My beliefs are conservative, reform, Christian, fundamentalist even, whatever you might call it, but I know that allowing ID into schools is opening the door to the Yahyas , the scientologists, every belief system with a claim to the real "origins ", a nightmare of crackpots and political correctness.

Same with prayer in school. It had its day and now that day is gone. Opening the door to that would as well lead to half a day's worth of the beseeching of numerous deities.

"No " is simple and clear.
"Yes" is a ghastly minefield.

11 Sizzlack  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:12:24pm

'The collapse of the rational thought process'

12 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:13:10pm

re: #8 george slivers

Islamic terrorists are bad people
Islamic terrorists tend to be creationists

Ergo! Creationists are bad people!

You kids are so brilliant.

Go piss up a rope.

13 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:13:19pm

re: #10 paint-right

My beliefs are conservative, reform, Christian, fundamentalist even, whatever you might call it, but I know that allowing ID into schools is opening the door to the Yahyas , the scientologists, every belief system with a claim to the real "origins ", a nightmare of crackpots and political correctness.

Same with prayer in school. It had its day and now that day is gone. Opening the door to that would as well lead to half a day's worth of the beseeching of numerous deities.

"No " is simple and clear.
"Yes" is a ghastly minefield.

kinda like dating?

14 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:14:38pm

re: #10 paint-right

My beliefs are conservative, reform, Christian, fundamentalist even, whatever you might call it, but I know that allowing ID into schools is opening the door to the Yahyas , the scientologists, every belief system with a claim to the real "origins ", a nightmare of crackpots and political correctness.

Same with prayer in school. It had its day and now that day is gone. Opening the door to that would as well lead to half a day's worth of the beseeching of numerous deities.

"No " is simple and clear.
"Yes" is a ghastly minefield.

Ditto. My kid can pray all he wants in school. Quietly, he can read his Bible in school. He will carry what he is taught at home to school.

15 paint-right  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:14:54pm

Dating?

/rejected?

16 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:14:55pm

re: #13 Nevergiveup

kinda like dating?

LOL!

17 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:15:44pm

re: #8 george slivers

This should be interesting. Does everyone have their heavy duty troll cutlery handy?

18 paint-right  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:15:45pm

re: #14 jcm

Ditto. My kid can pray all he wants in school. Quietly, he can read his Bible in school. He will carry what he is taught at home to school.

ditto squared
/but I forgot how to make that little 2

19 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:17:15pm

re: #12 jcm

Go piss up a rope.

Eloquent.

20 george slivers  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:00pm

re: #7 Ojoe

Reality check again:


Link

A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

There is not room for an "intelligent designer" in RANDOM mutation or NATURAL selection.

The only logical basis and conclusion of Darwinism is philosophical materialism. But arguments based on circular reasoning are the hallmark of Darwinists.

21 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:04pm

In 50 words or less, what does "ABSTINENCE" mean to you?

__________________________________________________ ______


REFERENCES SECTION:

Church you attend __________________________________________________ _

How often you attend ________________________________________________

When would be the best time to interview your:

father? _____________

mother? _____________

pastor? _____________


SHORT-ANSWER SECTION:

Answer by filling in the blank. Please answer freely, all answers
are confidential.

A: If I were shot, the last place I would want shot would be:

__________________________________________________ ______

B: If I were beaten, the last bone I would want broken is my:

__________________________________________________ ______

C: A woman's place is in the:

__________________________________________________ ______
D: The one thing I hope this application does not ask me about is:

__________________________________________________ ______

E. What do you want to do IF you grow up?

__________________________________________________ ______


F. When I meet a girl, the thing I always notice about her first is:

__________________________________________________ ______

F. What is the current going rate of a hotel room? __________________

I SWEAR THAT ALL INFORMATION SUPPLIED ABOVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE UNDER PENALTY OF DEATH, DISMEMBERMENT,
NATIVE AMERICAN ANT TORTURE, CRUCIFIXION, ELECTROCUTION, CHINESE
WATER TORTURE, RED HOT POKERS, AND HILLARY CLINTON KISS TORTURE.


__________________________________________________ _______
Applicant's Signature (that means sign your name, moron!)


_________________

22 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:07pm

re: #18 paint-right

ditto squared
/but I forgot how to make that little 2

2
Click quote on this comment and you will see the superscript html tag.

23 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:08pm

Damn, I can't watch the video (sound card problems). Has anyone watched it yet?

24 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:19pm

re: #19 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Eloquent.

I had a great teacher ;-P

25 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:31pm

I tend to confuse creationists when I say The Laws Of Physics are Gods Rules on How HE set up the Universe.

They tend to look perplexed after that

26 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:52pm

re: #21 jcm

never mind completely FUBARed.

27 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:56pm

re: #8 george slivers

Do you use this same faulty logic in your work? You know- the papers you're so busy writing?

28 Fat Jolly Penguin  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:18:58pm

re: #18 paint-right

You can either go [sup]2[/sup] (replace the square brackets with the triangle ones) or use the HTML code "& sup2" (remove the space).

29 paint-right  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:19:02pm

thanks to all these ID threads , My awareness has been heightened ...to all the science-related news items and so on.

I used to wonder about many things, among them:
the cowbird which lays its eggs in other birds' nests

and the whole world of pollination.
and fruit, come to think of it

the birds and the bees

30 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:19:43pm

re: #20 george slivers

A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

Would you like to pick one of those and call me that to my face?

31 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:19:44pm

re: #25 Jewels (AKA Julian)

I tend to confuse creationists when I say The Laws Of Physics are Gods Rules on How HE set up the Universe.

They tend to look perplexed after that

That works for me.

32 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:20:11pm

re: #24 jcm

I had a great teacher ;-P

Which one of the kids?

*duck*

33 Boondock St. Bender  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:20:15pm

re: #20 george slivers

kinda arrogant telling god how to run his universe aren't you.

34 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:20:19pm

re: #20 george slivers

A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

There is not room for an "intelligent designer" in RANDOM mutation or NATURAL selection.

The only logical basis and conclusion of Darwinism is philosophical materialism. But arguments based on circular reasoning are the hallmark of Darwinists.

Strong words about the Pope there george, make sure you don't cause a Catholic seeth.

35 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:20:31pm

re: #17 CyanSnowHawk

This should be interesting. Does everyone have their heavy duty troll cutlery handy?

Unlimbering.

36 WhiteRasta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:21:29pm

...."is planning a series of subway train advertisements in Manhattan—during September—proselytizing for Islam..."

I sincerely hope the first ads are visible on September 11'th......

37 Charles  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:21:47pm

Well, you know, for those complaining that I'm not focusing like a laser on Islamic terrorism, you might consider this a "tie-in."

38 marjoriemoon  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:21:57pm

Any good excerpts?

39 Boondock St. Bender  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:22:01pm

re: #30 pre-Boomer Marine brat

don't waste your time,people say things online all the time,that they wouldn't have the stones to say to your face.civility to some is a thing of the past.(kinda shows their class)

40 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:22:08pm

re: #32 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Which one of the kids?

*duck*

Mandy, deals the *Whack*s round here.

41 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:22:42pm

re: #36 WhiteRasta

...."is planning a series of subway train advertisements in Manhattan—during September—proselytizing for Islam..."

I sincerely hope the first ads are visible on September 11'th......

Actually, there is a movement a foot to have them taken down. And the fact that they WILL be up during 9/11 has not gone unnoticed!

42 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:23:15pm
43 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:23:38pm

re: #20 george slivers

What testable, falsifiable hypotheses does ID put forth? What testable, falsifiable theories have been presented by the DI? On what grounds can the DI claim that ID is a scientific theory?

44 Killgore Trout  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:23:43pm

re: #20 george slivers

So now you're insulting Christians? You're an ass.

45 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:23:45pm

re: #39 Boondock St. Bender

don't waste your time,people say things online all the time,that they wouldn't have the stones to say to your face.civility to some is a thing of the past.(kinda shows their class)

Oh, I know, but I shut "Whiskey Rebel" up with it on the Krauthammer thread a few days ago. Maybe this guy is a coward too.

46 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:23:48pm

re: #20 george slivers

A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

There is not room for an "intelligent designer" in RANDOM mutation or NATURAL selection.

The only logical basis and conclusion of Darwinism is philosophical materialism. But arguments based on circular reasoning are the hallmark of Darwinists.

No I accept the evidence in God's creation.

47 A Kiwi Infidel  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:24:03pm

re: #8 george slivers

Islamic terrorists are bad people
Islamic terrorists tend to be creationists

Ergo! Creationists are bad people!

You kids are so brilliant.

Well I am driven to say something else.

That is crap. If you believe that you are a sad sad case.

48 Lynn B.  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:24:24pm

re: #20 george slivers

Slow learner? Or just a troll? Inquiring minds want to know.

49 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:24:28pm

Have you-all seen Snapped Shot's take on the subway ads? It's very good.

(I think it was WriterMom who posted it in the links under Humour.)

50 Charles  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:25:14pm

re: #48 Lynn B.

Slow learner? Or just a troll? Inquiring minds want to know.

I vote troll.

51 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:25:23pm

re: #48 Lynn B.

Slow learner? Or just a troll? Inquiring minds want to know.

*WHOOOOMP*

Lighting the TrollBQ!

Give it 5 more.

52 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:25:34pm

re: #44 Killgore Trout

So now you're insulting Christians? You're an ass.

We're not Christians if we don't believe the way he believes.

53 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:25:57pm

I think LudwigVanQuixote put it best just now on the thread downstairs:

There is a great argument by the Rambam (a very important rabbi/philosopher/doctor/scholastic/prot o-rationalist of the 12th and early 13th cent) that is germane to the conversation.

It goes like this:

1. The word of G-d can not be false.
2. What has been proven to be true can not be false by definition.

Therefore, if what has been proven to be true contradicts your understanding of the word of G-d, the only thing that can be incorrect is your understanding of the word of G-d.

Can Ludwig get an Amen?

54 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:25:58pm

re: #48 Lynn B.

Slow learner? Or just a troll? Inquiring minds want to know.

What's the diferance?

55 Racer X  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:26:14pm

*runs to market to get troll bait*

56 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:26:34pm

re: #8 george slivers

You are an ass.

57 Boondock St. Bender  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:26:43pm

re: #53 Sharmuta

exellent

58 WhiteRasta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:26:57pm

re: #41 Nevergiveup

Gosh! I hope they do not succeed in bringing the ads down.

I would really, really love to see the reaction of you Yanks to seeing that shoved in your faces.

I suspect the reaction may not be pretty.

I love you Yanks, especially because you lot are not Euro-Girly men....

59 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:27:24pm

re: #57 Boondock St. Bender

Who knew it would come in handy so soon?

60 Charles  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:27:28pm

Either that or it's Fred Leuchter.

(Just watched Errol Morris' Mr. Death again. Features some people who have been subjects of recent posts, e.g. David Irving.)

61 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:27:34pm

re: #53 Sharmuta

I think LudwigVanQuixote put it best just now on the thread downstairs:

Can Ludwig get an Amen?

AMEN.

62 Lynn B.  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:28:09pm

re: #52 Josephine

We're not Christians if we don't believe the way he believes.

Oooo. Now where have we heard that before?

63 n in wi  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:28:16pm

re: #58 WhiteRasta

Gosh! I hope they do not succeed in bringing the ads down.

I would really, really love to see the reaction of you Yanks to seeing that shoved in your faces.

I suspect the reaction may not be pretty.

I love you Yanks, especially because you lot are not Euro-Girly men....

Have you seen the Dem. presidential nominee?

64 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:28:28pm

re: #58 WhiteRasta

Gosh! I hope they do not succeed in bringing the ads down.

I would really, really love to see the reaction of you Yanks to seeing that shoved in your faces.

I suspect the reaction may not be pretty.

I love you Yanks, especially because you lot are not Euro-Girly men....

Well knowing both New Yorkers and subways, I am afriad people may start peeing on them, and in the hot summer- well you get the point.

65 Lynn B.  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:28:32pm

re: #53 Sharmuta

AMEN !

66 SFGoth  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:28:34pm

Here we go again: when a group allies with Muslims on a topic of mutual interest, the Muslims end up as the last ones standing. See Iran: 1979 student revolution, commies, none left. I forget who wrote it (perhaps the author of Blackhawk Down), but there is an excellent and enormous account of the US embassy takeover in Iran, came out a few years ago?

67 marjoriemoon  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:28:50pm

re: #29 paint-right

thanks to all these ID threads , My awareness has been heightened ...to all the science-related news items and so on.

I used to wonder about many things, among them:
the cowbird which lays its eggs in other birds' nests

and the whole world of pollination.
and fruit, come to think of it

the birds and the bees

and the flowers and the trees
and the moon up above
and a thing called love.

:)

68 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:28:54pm

re: #53 Sharmuta

I think LudwigVanQuixote put it best just now on the thread downstairs:


Can Ludwig get an Amen?

Just went back and up-dinged him.

69 tokyobk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:29:15pm

I watched the Hitchens - D'Souza debates on YouTube as a result of reading threads here.

I thought the evening this was filmed D'Souza was the better debator by far and he pinned Hitchens into a losing battle trying to explain that since the ultimate tyrant figure is the God of the bible, and that belief in God predisposes one to belief in a "glorious" leader, that that in addition to the inquisition etc (whose numbers D'Souza downplayed)the blood of the many athiest tyrants of the last century were also the fault of religion.

But D'Souza tried to make the "how do we know the laws of nature cannot be changed at God's will" argument which is to me at least very much in the easter bunny category of argument. I wonder if devout believers realize that an all powerful being ought not to have to be proved by the same types of arguments that you would use to prove Santa. Gods invisibility is more of a problem than the devout would admit, IMO. By and large D'Souza focused on the good ideas that Christianity has brought from the idea of a rational universe to the idea of free will, responsibility and inquiry all of which, he says, gave birth to the very science that Hitchen trys to wield.

Then I tried to watch the Hitchens - Rabbi Boteach debate but the Rabbi is so obviously talking for the sake of hearing his own voice that I had to trun it off. D'Souza was a much better match for Hitchens and as I said on this evening was more articulate. Also, as Hitchens joked in his opening, D'Souza is a true believer and that comes across.

Worth watching.

70 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:29:31pm

re: #34 CyanSnowHawk

Strong words about the Pope there george, make sure you don't cause a Catholic seeth.

Indeed, and when Catholics seethe they tend to say the Rosary

///It can get nasty...

71 WhiteRasta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:29:52pm

re: #63 n in wi

Well, there is bound to be one in every crowd.......

72 cicero05  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:30:04pm

Allah is all powerful. He's even evolving animals as we speak. Right here he put his own Allah brand right inside some poor cow.

Score one for the creationists!

73 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:30:11pm

re: #66 SFGoth

Mark Bowden is the author.

74 George Slivers  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:30:15pm

re: #34 CyanSnowHawk

Strong words about the Pope there george, make sure you don't cause a Catholic seeth.

The pope probably doesn't understand Darwinian evolution given the campaign of "bait and switch" used to mislead theists.

Typically it goes like this.

Darwinists:Look antibiotic resistance, that's evolution.
Theist: Sounds good I'll bite.
Darwinists: Oh by the way, now that you accept evolution, you must realize that the world and all it entails is due to chance and natural laws.

75 MandyManners  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:31:01pm

re: #20 george slivers

A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

There is not room for an "intelligent designer" in RANDOM mutation or NATURAL selection.

The only logical basis and conclusion of Darwinism is philosophical materialism. But arguments based on circular reasoning are the hallmark of Darwinists.

Go piddle up a thread.

76 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:31:35pm

re: #74 George Slivers

Kinda new here, aren't ya'?

77 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:31:50pm

re: #62 Lynn B.

Oooo. Now where have we heard that before?

You say it this time. I get in trouble when I say it.

/

78 USA  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:31:54pm

re: #66 SFGoth

Here we go again: when a group allies with Muslims on a topic of mutual interest, the Muslims end up as the last ones standing. See Iran: 1979 student revolution, commies, none left. I forget who wrote it (perhaps the author of Blackhawk Down), but there is an excellent and enormous account of the US embassy takeover in Iran, came out a few years ago?

Guests of the Ayatollah: The First Battle in America's War with Militant Islam
by Mark Bowden

Good stuff.

79 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:32:29pm

re: #8 george slivers

Islamic terrorists are bad people
Islamic terrorists tend to be creationists

Ergo! Creationists are bad people!

You kids are so brilliant.

And you are not.

Registered 1 year, 55 posts.

Another one.

80 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:32:34pm

re: #66 SFGoth

Here we go again: when a group allies with Muslims on a topic of mutual interest, the Muslims end up as the last ones standing. See Iran: 1979 student revolution, commies, none left. I forget who wrote it (perhaps the author of Blackhawk Down), but there is an excellent and enormous account of the US embassy takeover in Iran, came out a few years ago?

Guests of the Ayatollah: The Iran Hostage Crisis: The First Battle in America's War with Militant Islam

81 Boondock St. Bender  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:32:35pm

re: #75 MandyManners

I think he already did.....

82 Lynn B.  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:32:39pm

re: #74 George Slivers

Oh yeah. Definitely a troll.

Have fun with it. I've got a buffalo wing blue cheese pizza on the way ...

83 Racer X  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:32:48pm

I am so much smarter than all of you. I am smarter than the Pope too. Nanernanernaner.

///

84 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:33:02pm

re: #75 MandyManners

Oh dear, now you've gone and pissed off Mandy. The BBQ ready yet jcm?

85 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:33:16pm

re: #74 George Slivers
God gave you a brain, use it for something besides a hat rack.

86 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:33:19pm

re: #76 CyanSnowHawk

Momentary OT ...
Cyan, heard anything about how the three Northrup guys are doing?

87 KingKenrod  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:33:42pm

Point: Islam is looking for allies wherever they can find them. Hell, Europe turned into a doormat for them just from colonialist guilt. Islam will stick it's foot into whatever legal crack you make for them, and creationists are making a big legal crack.

88 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:33:49pm

Has anyone seen a george slivers?

89 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:34:02pm

re: #85 pingjockey

God gave you a brain, use it for something besides a hat rack.

I doubt the premiss of you first assertion.

90 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:34:38pm

re: #88 Walter L. Newton
I want to know what papers he's published so I can read them.

91 tokyobk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:34:43pm

re: #85 pingjockey

God gave you a brain, use it for something besides a hat rack.


He is very smart. He writes peer reviewed essays and is a monucularbioproctopologicalphysiologist or somthing.

92 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:34:52pm

re: #74 George Slivers

The pope probably doesn't understand Darwinian evolution given the campaign of "bait and switch" used to mislead theists.

Typically it goes like this.

Darwinists:Look antibiotic resistance, that's evolution.
Theist: Sounds good I'll bite.
Darwinists: Oh by the way, now that you accept evolution, you must realize that the world and all it entails is due to chance and natural laws.

You are a jerk, yes?

93 wrenchwench  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:35:15pm

re: #69 tokyobk

very much in the easter bunny category of argument

That could rotate.

94 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:35:20pm

re: #88 Walter L. Newton

Has anyone seen a george slivers?

I'v never seen a goerge silver but I saw one Bush once.

95 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:35:22pm

re: #74 George Slivers

The pope probably doesn't understand Darwinian evolution...

Wow.

96 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:35:44pm

re: #92 Walter L. Newton

You are a jerk, yes?

off, yes.

97 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:35:53pm

re: #74 George Slivers

The pope probably doesn't understand Darwinian evolution given the campaign of "bait and switch" used to mislead theists.

Typically it goes like this.

Darwinists:Look antibiotic resistance, that's evolution.
Theist: Sounds good I'll bite.
Darwinists: Oh by the way, now that you accept evolution, you must realize that the world and all it entails is due to chance and natural laws.

Ah, I think that formulation is a classic "non-sequitur". Not liable to get anybody very far in a serious discussion.

98 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:35:59pm

re: #89 jcm
What? George doesn't have a brain? Hahaha, the line in Ghost Busters just flashed in my head.

99 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:36:15pm

re: #74 George Slivers

It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.

St Augustine

100 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:36:32pm

re: #98 pingjockey

What? George doesn't have a brain? Hahaha, the line in Ghost Busters just flashed in my head.

LOL!

101 Racer X  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:36:54pm

Excuse me while I whip out my PHD.

*wimmin in room gasp*

102 Tigger2005  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:37:04pm

A theist who accepts franklinist electricityism is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

There is not room for Thor the "thunder god" in RANDOM friction and NATURAL charges.

The only logical basis and conclusion of Electricityism is philosophical materialism. But arguments based on circular reasoning are the hallmark of Electricityists.

103 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:37:52pm

re: #86 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Here is the NG corporate Internet site for news related to Stansell, Gonsalves, and Howes. Looks like they are on the road to putting their lives back together.

104 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:38:23pm

For some reason I think the POPE is educated enough to understand evolution and its place in the universe.

105 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:38:29pm

re: #101 Racer X

Excuse me while I whip out my PHD.

*wimmin in room gasp*

I worked at a dairy farm....
I can Pile it Higher and Deeper too.

106 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:39:02pm

re: #99 Sharmuta

St. Augustine? Another intellectual featherweight.

/

107 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:39:23pm

re: #12 jcm

Go piss up a rope.

But was that Mandy Approved tm

108 theparson  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:39:26pm

How come no one has told Charles what not to post yet? I'm disoriented!

109 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:39:26pm

I love hanging out here. You guys all seem so nice until someone says something that just crosses the line. Then...

WHAM

110 WhiteRasta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:39:35pm

re: #105 jcm

HEY!

Don't be dissing my BS Degree, you!

111 tokyobk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:39:57pm

re: #105 jcm

I worked at a dairy farm....
I can Pile it Higher and Deeper too.

I thought you were refering to a Pimp and Hustling Degree. That's what Ice T has.

112 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:40:11pm

re: #107 Mars Needs Neocons
It was approved by this old salt. It is a good, succinct rejoinder.

113 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:40:19pm

re: #109 Ford_Prefect

I love hanging out here. You guys all seem so nice until someone says something that just crosses the line. Then...

WHAM

Yeah, kinda like a saloon in the Old West...

114 HoosierHoops  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:40:23pm

re: #8 george slivers

Islamic terrorists are bad people
Islamic terrorists tend to be creationists

Ergo! Creationists are bad people!

You kids are so brilliant.


Hey the infamous George is back..Damn dude you are famous..
/ No one has made that connection at all.. Your pretzel logic only makes it so..
//Are you doing autographs after 9?

115 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:40:43pm

re: #107 Mars Needs Neocons

But was that Mandy Approved tm

I might have to pay restitution....
which will definitely leave a mark.

116 Lynn B.  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:40:55pm

re: #54 Nevergiveup

What's the diferance?

Slow learners are usually given enough rope here to hang themselves with ... if they so choose.

Trolls just get cut off at the knees. Or BBQ'd.

Pizza time.

117 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:40:55pm

re: #108 theparson
Give 'em time. Someone denser than lead will do it.

118 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:41:10pm

I believe in evolution and consider myself rational. But religion has it's place after all:

119 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:41:48pm

re: #113 CIA Reject

Yeah, kinda like a saloon in the Old West...

Exactly. Except when one guy turns around to start taking his ten paces the other guy walks up behind him and pants him.

120 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:42:00pm

re: #103 CyanSnowHawk

Here is the NG corporate Internet site for news related to Stansell, Gonsalves, and Howes. Looks like they are on the road to putting their lives back together.

Oops, here is the link.

121 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:42:22pm

re: #119 Ford_Prefect

Exactly. Except when one guy turns around to start taking his ten paces the other guy walks up behind him and pants him.

LOL!

122 Tigger2005  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:42:24pm

re: #109 Ford_Prefect

I love hanging out here. You guys all seem so nice until someone says something that just crosses the line. Then...

WHAM

Oh, come on pal, we don't MEAN it! Here, have a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster on me! Ah, sorry, I don't know how the Tobasco sauce got in that!

123 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:42:27pm

re: #37 Charles

Well, you know, for those complaining that I'm not focusing like a laser on Islamic terrorism, you might consider this a "tie-in."

Nah, a diversion isn't bad once in a while. Especially when it comes to other wrongs in society.

re: #20 george slivers

A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

There is not room for an "intelligent designer" in RANDOM mutation or NATURAL selection.

The only logical basis and conclusion of Darwinism is philosophical materialism. But arguments based on circular reasoning are the hallmark of Darwinists.

Nice troll.

I'll publicly state right now that I'm an atheist. What will you tell me? That' I'm incapable of love? Kindness? Being moral?

124 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:42:27pm

re: #116 Lynn B.
We just got done with tacos. Used to a pound of beef would do. Now it takes two to three pounds to feed the bottomless pits that are my 3 boys.

125 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:42:39pm

re: #108 theparson

How come no one has told Charles what not to post yet? I'm disoriented!

Charles why don't you post on what the Islamists are up to?

/oh that's what this thread is about.
*nevermind*

126 ZK273  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:42:51pm

Bedfellows certainly don't get much stranger.

127 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:43:01pm

re: #74 George Slivers

re: #20 george slivers
A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

re: #30 pre-Boomer Marine brat
Would you like to pick one of those and call me that to my face?

You ignored my question up-thread. Was there a reason for it?

/as if I didn't know

128 WhiteRasta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:43:20pm

re: #118 Nevergiveup

May G-d Bless Louis Armstrong's memory, for eternity....

129 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:43:26pm

re: #123 boofar
Give them time. You hit the trifecta.

130 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:43:36pm

re: #8 george slivers

Islamic terrorists are bad people
Islamic terrorists tend to be creationists

Ergo! Creationists are bad people!

You kids are so brilliant.

Hardly. Creationism taught as scientific fact is the problem (but nowhere near on the scale of head-choppers.)

Nice strawman.

131 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:43:45pm

re: #108 theparson

How come no one has told Charles what not to post yet? I'm disoriented!

Now you know how eye feel sometimes.

132 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:43:51pm

re: #122 Tigger2005

Oh, come on pal, we don't MEAN it! Here, have a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster on me! Ah, sorry, I don't know how the Tobasco sauce got in that!

Just give me the wet sponge wrapped around a brick. It's faster.

133 tokyobk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:44:19pm

re: #128 WhiteRasta

May G-d Bless Louis Armstrong's memory, for eternity....

Amen!

My pic is of him eating ramen backstage in Tokyo in the early 1950's.

134 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:44:28pm

re: #120 CyanSnowHawk

Oops, here is the link.

Thanks!

135 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:44:35pm

re: #112 pingjockey

It was approved by this old salt. It is a good, succinct rejoinder.

Im just mad because jcm got there first.

136 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:44:54pm

re: #132 Ford_Prefect

Just give me the wet sponge wrapped around a brick. It's faster.

Ah yes, the "...alcoholic equivalent of a mugging..."

137 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:45:09pm

God and religion are not the problems. There is nothing wrong in believing in God or creationism. The problem arises when you try to teach in a public school as a scientific fact. That's all.

138 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:45:09pm

re: #135 Mars Needs Neocons
Heh. It is a good zing.

139 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:45:11pm

re: #131 Josephine

Now you know how eye feel sometimes.

I hope they have a note from the doc, 'cause theparson will run 'em in and have 'em blow on the machine.

140 Tigger2005  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:45:17pm

re: #132 Ford_Prefect

Just give me the wet sponge wrapped around a brick. It's faster.

We're nicer than THAT for heaven's sake! We use bars of Ivory soap in wet towels.

141 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:45:39pm

re: #115 jcm

I might have to pay restitution....
which will definitely leave a mark.

lol

142 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:46:56pm

re: #136 CIA Reject

Ah yes, the "...alcoholic equivalent of a mugging..."

AAAHHH!

Sorry a little white mouse named Benji just ran under my desk.

143 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:47:00pm

re: #140 Tigger2005
I have my grandfathers leather sap from the 30s. That'll put you out real quick.

144 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:47:14pm

re: #132 Ford_Prefect

Just give me the wet sponge wrapped around a brick. It's faster.

Ford, you should know its a lemon wrapped around a large gold brick

145 Idle Drifter  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:47:48pm

re: #98 pingjockey

"Cats and Dogs"

146 lori lane  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:48:01pm

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

147 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:48:24pm

re: #137 boofar

God and religion are not the problems. There is nothing wrong in believing in God or creationism. The problem arises when you try to teach in a public school as a scientific fact. That's all.

Perhaps the greatest insult to Faith is the attempt to "prove" the existence of G*d, or "prove" that He did, or did not do some act. By definition Faith needs no such "proofs".

His Thoughts are not our thoughts

His ways are not our ways.

148 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:48:49pm

re: #144 Mars Needs Neocons

Ford, you should know its a lemon wrapped around a large gold brick

DOH! You are, of course, correct.

149 theparson  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:48:53pm

re: #139 jcm

I hope they have a note from the doc, 'cause theparson will run 'em in and have 'em blow on the machine.

First we do the SFST consisting of Gaze Nystagmus, OLS and W&T. If they fail two out of three we will go in for the 10-81. Just so ya know.

150 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:49:08pm

re: #146 lori lane

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

Welcome aboard.

I remember when I first got my membership. I looked at the post and thought: Hmm... Charles has opened the door. Wait... ! NEED TO REGISTER *NOW*!

151 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:49:21pm

re: #146 lori lane

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

Welcome to the madhouse.

152 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:49:37pm

re: #145 Idle Drifter
Its true, this man has no dick. Still cracks me up.
I've seen shit that'll turn you white.

153 CapeCoddah  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:49:50pm

re: #8 george slivers

Oh, Lord, Not this jackass again.

154 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:49:54pm

re: #143 pingjockey

I have my grandfathers leather sap from the 30s. That'll put you out real quick.

What else did he leave you? A violin case? White spats?

155 Boondock St. Bender  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:49:54pm

re: #146 lori lane

welcome!jump in the waters fine.

156 Cicero05  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:50:26pm

re: #146 lori lane

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

You're going to have do something about that generic green football...

157 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:50:26pm

re: #147 CIA Reject

Perhaps the greatest insult to Faith is the attempt to "prove" the existence of G*d, or "prove" that He did, or did not do some act. By definition Faith needs no such "proofs".

His Thoughts are not our thoughts

His ways are not our ways.

And that is the spiritual quest. Understanding his thoughts, and discovering his ways. A journey of 20 years, and I've just begun.

158 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:50:28pm

re: #146 lori lane
Congrats. Hang onto your hat. You hatched into a hurricane.

159 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:50:32pm

re: #148 Ford_Prefect

The sponge around the brick is what you get when you use cheap liquor to make the Gargle Blaster. The best places give you the full lemon/Gold brick treatment.

160 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:50:34pm

re: #147 CIA Reject

Perhaps the greatest insult to Faith is the attempt to "prove" the existence of G*d, or "prove" that He did, or did not do some act. By definition Faith needs no such "proofs".

His Thoughts are not our thoughts

His ways are not our ways.

That's one way of looking at it as a theist. One could make an argument that your faith in your God is so weak that you need a "sign". You don't have the internal strength to do this thing.

161 lori lane  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:50:55pm

re: #150 boofar

Thanks! Yes I've been waiting and watching forever and as I sit here tonight at Panera, b/c I have no Innernet or TV tonight, I took a quick look before I shut the laptop and couldn't believe my eyes! :)

/end of long sentence. :)

162 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:51:04pm

re: #149 theparson

First we do the SFST consisting of Gaze Nystagmus, OLS and W&T. If they fail two out of three we will go in for the 10-81. Just so ya know.

Only two beers, officer, I've only had two honest!

163 Dolphin  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:51:42pm

re: #78 USA

The book was excellent. The documentary not so much.

164 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:51:46pm

re: #161 lori lane

Thanks! Yes I've been waiting and watching forever and as I sit here tonight at Panera, b/c I have no Innernet or TV tonight, I took a quick look before I shut the laptop and couldn't believe my eyes! :)

/end of long sentence. :)

Buy Lori a drink.

Walter in Golden, Co.

165 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:51:49pm

re: #146 lori lane

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

Welcome! Pick up your shells, and man the bar!

166 Neo Con since 9-11  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:51:59pm

re: #146 lori lane

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

Welcome to the lizard horde. Now get me a Bombay and tonic.

167 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:52:07pm

re: #154 pre-Boomer Marine brat
I wish he'd of left me a violin case with a Thompson, but alas no. Just a couple really cool silk ties, the sap, and a couple of Ivory handled straight razors.

168 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:52:29pm

re: #146 lori lane

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

Welcome!

169 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:52:58pm

re: #159 CyanSnowHawk

The sponge around the brick is what you get when you use cheap liquor to make the Gargle Blaster. The best places give you the full lemon/Gold brick treatment.

Ah yes. The top shelf Gargle Blaster.

170 lori lane  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:53:16pm

re: #156 Cicero05

Hmmm I need to look around here and get familiar with the fancy stuff. They are getting ready to close Panera though! Hope to have my Innernet tomorrow sometime!

171 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:53:18pm

re: #106 Josephine

St. Augustine? Another intellectual featherweight.

/

Yeah- between him and the Pope- what do they know about the word of God?

172 LudwigVanQuixote  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:54:02pm

Hmmm... Islamic anti science... As an American, Jewish, Physicist, this is like the anti- Reeses peanut butter cup... Two horrific tastes that go worse together! Yummy

173 theparson  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:54:08pm

re: #160 boofar

That's one way of looking at it as a theist. One could make an argument that your faith in your God is so weak that you need a "sign". You don't have the internal strength to do this thing.

One could make any argument against another's faith that one may want but, why would one feel the need? I don't question your decision to be an a-thiest. Why should it so bother you that some of us choose to be theists?

174 Cicero05  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:54:17pm

re: #161 lori lane

So Lori, whaddya think about...

INTELLIGENT DESIGN!

Bwah ha ha ha ha

175 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:54:29pm

re: #171 Sharmuta
You silly girl. Obviously George knows more. He told us so.

176 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:54:33pm

re: #146 lori lane

Yay! Hello! I'm hatched! Finally! :)

Welcome

177 LudwigVanQuixote  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:55:01pm

P.S. Love to all fellow hitchhikers. I have my towel...

178 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:55:04pm

re: #167 pingjockey

I wish he'd of left me a violin case with a Thompson, but alas no. Just a couple really cool silk ties, the sap, and a couple of Ivory handled straight razors.


OH REALLY!

179 Irish Rose  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:55:20pm

Apologies to Charles for the OT but I need some information quickly.

Charles, are you familiar with the Southern Poverty Law Center?
How accurate is the information there regarding anti-immigration hate groups in the US?

I found some information there that piques my curiosity.

A quick answer will do, then back on topic.

180 akak  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:55:22pm

What was it KSM said "Osama we can do 10 million" not yet Osama replied.

Talk about creationism.

181 lori lane  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:55:22pm

re: #165 jcm

Drinks all around! Gotta log out before they kick me out! :)
Thanks everyone for the warm welcome! What a great way to end
the day! :) Thanks Charles! :)

182 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:55:26pm

re: #174 Cicero05
Geez. let her get her lizard legs first!

183 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:56:11pm

re: #157 jcm

And that is the spiritual quest. Understanding his thoughts, and discovering his ways. A journey of 20 years, and I've just begun.

I'm 16 years ahead of you and no farther along! It's not the getting there, it's the journey that counts.

184 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:56:36pm

re: #177 LudwigVanQuixote

P.S. Love to all fellow hitchhikers. I have my towel...

You are a hoopy frood

185 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:56:49pm

re: #178 pre-Boomer Marine brat
Wow.

186 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:57:14pm

Did I see something upthread about barbeque? Hope someone saves me a sliver.

187 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:57:28pm

re: #185 pingjockey

Wow.

Had you ever heard of Phil Harris?
This is one of his classics.

188 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:57:31pm

re: #160 boofar

That's one way of looking at it as a theist. One could make an argument that your faith in your God is so weak that you need a "sign". You don't have the internal strength to do this thing.

EXACTLY!

189 Boondock St. Bender  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:57:52pm

re: #179 Irish Rose

if you don't mind my input,the splc are the group that put an end to the united clans.they seem like straight shooters,but any group is suseptable to zealots taking over the ship.

190 theparson  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:57:54pm

re: #179 Irish Rose

We get a magazine from them every quarter of so. It strikes me that they list anyone who expresses any kind of displeasure with any ethnic group as a hater/hate group. In some cases I think their assessment is valid but many times it is way over the top.

191 Charles  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:58:41pm

re: #179 Irish Rose

I have never discovered false information there, but there's a lot of political maneuvering around that group. Which probably means they're over some targets.

192 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:58:44pm

Seven people who cheated death:

[Link: www.cracked.com...]

You can't make this stuff up!

193 Idle Drifter  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:58:47pm

re: #152 pingjockey
Ghostbusters is an all time classic

re: #154 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Violin Case... 0_0!

194 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:59:00pm

re: #187 pre-Boomer Marine brat
Yeah. I didn't know he made music. I remember him from the American Sportsman. Him, Curt Gowdy, and Bing Crosby would be hunting or fishing.

195 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:59:12pm

re: #186 Pvt Bin Jammin

Did I see something upthread about barbeque? Hope someone saves me a sliver.

The Cowardly Lyin' bugged out on us.

/lizard bellies rumbin'

196 CapeCoddah  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 5:59:25pm

re: #79 Mars Needs Neocons

And, He has made sure he used all 55 of those posts to be a full blown asshole.

197 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:00:06pm

re: #196 CapeCoddah

And, He has made sure he used all 55 of those posts to be a full blown asshole.

So I noticed

198 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:00:06pm

re: #179 Irish Rose

Apologies to Charles for the OT but I need some information quickly.

Charles, are you familiar with the Southern Poverty Law Center?
How accurate is the information there regarding anti-immigration hate groups in the US?

I found some information there that piques my curiosity.

A quick answer will do, then back on topic.

Founded in 1971 by a pair of Alabama lawyers, Morris Dees and Joe Levin, the Montgomery-based Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) quickly built a reputation as America's leading "civil rights law firm," suing Southern institutions resistant to desegregation, publicizing hate crimes, and using the media to denounce the perpetrators of those crimes. At the time of SPLC's founding, Julian Bond, who currently chairs the NAACP, was named the fledgling group's first President.

Pretty radical lefty IIRC.

199 LudwigVanQuixote  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:00:12pm

re: #184 Ford_Prefect

You are a hoopy frood

Thank you, thank you... and now for some poetry...

200 Irish Rose  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:00:28pm

re: #191 Charles

I have never discovered false information there, but there's a lot of political maneuvering around that group. Which probably means they're over some targets.

Thanks Charles, I knew that you'd be able to give me some insight.

201 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:00:34pm

re: #195 pre-Boomer Marine brat
That figures.

Just can't often get a decent meal around here these days.

202 Thanos  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:00:41pm

Nice find Charles

203 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:01:31pm

re: #183 CIA Reject

I'm 16 years ahead of you and no farther along! It's not the getting there, it's the journey that counts.

Raised Baptist, father's a missionary and preacher. I struck out on my own, and dropped everything for a while. Picked up again 20 years ago.

204 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:02:18pm

re: #194 pingjockey

Yeah. I didn't know he made music. I remember him from the American Sportsman. Him, Curt Gowdy, and Bing Crosby would be hunting or fishing.

Oh yeah. He was one of the bandleaders at the end of the Swing Era, though not one of the greats.

205 HoosierHoops  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:02:46pm

re: #182 pingjockey

Geez. let her get her lizard legs first!

welcome lori!
one day i was turning off my computer at work when registration opened up.. I jumped right on it..you'll have a great time here..
/ and charles is thinking 'if i would have waited just one more minute...*slaps forehead*
/welcome

206 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:03:11pm

re: #200 Irish Rose

Thanks Charles, I knew that you'd be able to give me some insight.

If I am not mistaken Morris Dees represented an illegal Mexican who crossed over onto the private property of a Texas rancher who took him captive. The illegal sued and now owns that man's ranch.

207 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:03:27pm

I like george slivers. He is straightforward in his beliefs, and doesn't try to hide it. However, I don't think he knows what random really means. In my mind, God can do random.

208 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:03:32pm

re: #204 pre-Boomer Marine brat
The things you learn here. Too cool.

209 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:04:10pm

And now for some humor.

[Link: sendables.jibjab.com...]

210 wolfie  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:04:25pm

re: #137 boofar

God and religion are not the problems. There is nothing wrong in believing in God or creationism. The problem arises when you try to teach in a public school as a scientific fact. That's all.

To me that's the whole enchilada, too.

211 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:04:53pm

re: #188 CIA Reject

re: #173 theparson

re: #160 boofar

That's one way of looking at it as a theist. One could make an argument that your faith in your God is so weak that you need a "sign". You don't have the internal strength to do this thing.

Actually my entire position on the issue of creation can be summed up by the inscription on a statue at Lourdes:

"For those without faith no explanation is possible, for those with Faith no explanation is necessary"

212 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:05:40pm

re: #207 Gordon Marock
The "old one" as Einstein called it, can do whatever it wants.

213 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:05:53pm

Where'd Georgie boy go?

The coals on the BBQ are ready!

214 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:06:19pm

re: #194 pingjockey

Yeah. I didn't know he made music. I remember him from the American Sportsman. Him, Curt Gowdy, and Bing Crosby would be hunting or fishing.

The Thing. I remember Jimmy Durante singing it in a movie.

The Preacher and the Bear.

Enjoy.

215 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:06:19pm

re: #211 CIA Reject

Well... yeh.

216 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:06:22pm

re: #213 jcm
It didn't even say buh bye!

217 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:06:28pm

re: #207 Gordon Marock

I like george slivers. He is straightforward in his beliefs, and doesn't try to hide it. However, I don't think he knows what random really means. In my mind, God can do random.

You can be straightforward in your beliefs and not be blunt and insulting. Most people figure that out by their teen years.

218 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:06:45pm

re: #214 pre-Boomer Marine brat
Thank you!

219 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:07:11pm

re: #207 Gordon Marock

I like george slivers. He is straightforward in his beliefs, and doesn't try to hide it. However, I don't think he knows what random really means. In my mind, God can do random.

He is straightforward, but he doesn't listen to anything anyone else says. It's all him. I think that it's more about the fight than the information. He's just stirrin the hornets nest to feed his own ego.

That says troll.

220 Idle Drifter  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:07:39pm

re: #209 boofar

One of their best yet!

221 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:08:01pm

re: #203 jcm

Raised Baptist, father's a missionary and preacher. I struck out on my own, and dropped everything for a while. Picked up again 20 years ago.

Cradle Catholic here, graduated prep seminary and went on to other things, but some things never leave you... Glad to be walkin' with you!

222 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:08:23pm

re: #149 theparson

First we do the SFST consisting of Gaze Nystagmus, OLS and W&T. If they fail two out of three we will go in for the 10-81. Just so ya know.

What are OLS and W&T?

I get nystagmus when I have vertigo.

223 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:08:39pm

re: #214 pre-Boomer Marine brat

The Thing. I remember Jimmy Durante singing it in a movie.

The Preacher and the Bear.

Enjoy.

My grandfather, who passed before I was born, resembled Bing Crosby. He was a traveling salesman for a time, and restaurants would give him free meals if he'd sit in the window seat people would come in to see Bing Crosby.

224 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:08:50pm

re: #213 jcm

see the links in 214

*grin*

225 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:08:58pm

re: #213 jcm

I know! I'm still waiting for an answer to Slumbering Behenoth's now famous question:

What testable, falsifiable hypotheses does ID put forth? What testable, falsifiable theories have been presented by the DI? On what grounds can the DI claim that ID is a scientific theory?

226 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:09:17pm

re: #210 wolfie

To me that's the whole enchilada, too.

Yup. I'm an atheist, but it's due to personal choice. Overall, I have a positive view of faith (I might become a theist in the future.)

Religion tends to create social bridges that would be impossible otherwise. Different people come together that are so ethnically and socially different, that they would not be together otherwise. They talk in a more respectful manner to one another. They raise funds for the underprivileged. For society as a whole, religion is a good thing.

Just not in the science classroom and the scientific community.

227 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:09:21pm

re: #224 pre-Boomer Marine brat

see the links in 214

*grin*

oops

228 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:09:25pm

re: #207 Gordon Marock

I like george slivers. He is straightforward in his beliefs, and doesn't try to hide it. However, I don't think he knows what random really means. In my mind, God can do random.

G*d invented random!

229 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:09:25pm

re: #225 Sharmuta

Er- sorry Sleepy B for mis-spelling your nic!

230 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:09:27pm

re: #212 pingjockey

The "old one" as Einstein called it, can do whatever it wants.

Right, because if one could 'know' the exact position of every particle and its vector, and 'know' every chemical, nuclear, magnetic, or other force that acted upon each such atom, then nothing is truly random to such a being. Accordingly, those that deny the possibility that evolutionary theory are correct, really don't believe in an all powerful God, they just believe in the King James Bible.

231 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:09:45pm

re: #223 jcm

My grandfather, who passed before I was born, resembled Bing Crosby. He was a traveling salesman for a time, and restaurants would give him free meals if he'd sit in the window seat people would come in to see Bing Crosby.

LOL

232 Crimsonfisted  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:10:21pm

re: #21 jcm

AND HILLARY CLINTON KISS TORTURE.


ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

233 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:10:33pm

re: #20 george slivers

OK, I will tell you a joke.

Some Scientists became very savvy and they created life in their laboratory.

"Well," they said to each other, "Guess we don't need God anymore, let's go see Him and tell Him."

So they went to see God.

"What do you have to tell me?" said God.

"God," said the scientists, "we've understood evolution so well that we've created life in the laboratory, and you aren't needed anymore, you can go now."

"Well," said God, "Why don't you show me how you do this."

"Ok," said the scientists, "First you take some dirt", and they reached down to the ground for some dirt,

"Wait!" said God, "Make your own dirt!"

...........................

And there you have it.

Evolution comes from God.

And Faith, well that is looked for best in the spiritual realms; If you look for faith directly on the physical plane, you will just spin around and around, because the physical is just a reflection of the spiritual.

Hope this makes some sense to you.

234 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:10:46pm

re: #220 Idle Drifter

One of their best yet!

Meh... it's not bad. Their Bush vs. Kerry, '04 election was *far* better, imo.

235 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:10:54pm

re: #221 CIA Reject

Cradle Catholic here, graduated prep seminary and went on to other things, but some things never leave you... Glad to be walkin' with you!

Amen, brother.

236 theparson  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:11:18pm

re: #222 Josephine

One Legged Stand and Walk & Turn.

237 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:11:59pm

re: #171 Sharmuta

Yeah- between him and the Pope- what do they know about the word of God?

Pfhhhhhhhhhht.

How many papers have they had published?

238 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:12:22pm

re: #233 Ojoe

OK, I will tell you a joke.

Some Scientists became very savvy and they created life in their laboratory.

"Well," they said to each other, "Guess we don't need God anymore, let's go see Him and tell Him."

So they went to see God.

"What do you have to tell me?" said God.

"God," said the scientists, "we've understood evolution so well that we've created life in the laboratory, and you aren't needed anymore, you can go now."

"Well," said God, "Why don't you show me how you do this."

"Ok," said the scientists, "First you take some dirt", and they reached down to the ground for some dirt,

"Wait!" said God, "Make your own dirt!"

...........................

And there you have it.

Evolution comes from God.

And Faith, well that is looked for best in the spiritual realms; If you look for faith directly on the physical plane, you will just spin around and around, because the physical is just a reflection of the spiritual.

Hope this makes some sense to you.

Was the Big Bang God?

239 Reno911  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:12:32pm

re: #37 Charles

Now if you could just tie-in Islam, Creationism, shredding musical instruments, cycling, and iphones...in one magical post...everyone would be satisfied.

240 Thanos  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:12:46pm

George,

Glad to see you are back. You still have some unanswered questions from the other night. Lucky for you someone else answered one, so I'll let you off the hook on that.

Now, do you have an example of something that's irreducibly complex, a new one that hasn't been thoroughly debunked already?

Simple question, you should be able to answer.

241 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:12:49pm

re: #239 Reno911

Now if you could just tie-in Islam, Creationism, shredding musical instruments, cycling, and iphones...in one magical post...everyone would be satisfied.

*LOL*

242 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:12:57pm

re: #230 Gordon Marock
Bingo! It is the height of arrogance to think that a human can know the mind of a creator. If the universe was/is a made thing, we are so far down on the intelligence scale it isn't funny.

243 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:13:13pm

re: #239 Reno911

Now if you could just tie-in Islam, Creationism, shredding musical instruments, cycling, and iphones...in one magical post...everyone would be satisfied.

I think this post is foretold in Revelations.

244 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:13:31pm

I tried to watch the video, but it shut off my browser. Maybe I'll come back and watch it over the weekend, since I'm not really up to browser games tonight.

245 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:13:33pm

re: #233 Ojoe
Good one.

246 HoosierHoops  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:14:08pm

re: #239 Reno911

Now if you could just tie-in Islam, Creationism, shredding musical instruments, cycling, and iphones...in one magical post...everyone would be satisfied.

ahh you forgot hoops..
/i forgive you :]

247 Thanos  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:14:23pm

George:

Do you have research or proof of ID?

How does ID explain the retroviral DNA that matches among primate families? Can you offer us a hypothesis?

248 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:14:34pm

re: #236 theparson

One Legged Stand and Walk & Turn.

I don't drive but how would someone prove he was having an attack of vertigo and not showing signs of intoxication? Would a breath test be required?

(I can't remember how to spell breathalyzer.)

249 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:14:40pm

re: #245 pingjockey

Yes, it is understandable at that level. I forget where I first heard that one.

250 tokyobk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:14:42pm

re: #226 boofar

Yup. I'm an atheist, but it's due to personal choice. Overall, I have a positive view of faith (I might become a theist in the future.)
Just not in the science classroom and the scientific community.

But this would make you agnostic, right? I think most people who call themselves athiest are not anti-thiest like Hitchens.

In my opinon there could be a God and I kind of hope there is, its just the descriptions of God so far seem so abviously human and the various thumbprints of different cultures are so obviously all over the founding texts, ditto their limited understanding of the world around them.

I think if God spoke to Hitchens directly he would have himself committed before he believed. That is an athiest. There is no God and he is sure of it no matter what, just as a thiest cannot be waterboarded into giving up their faith.

251 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:15:14pm

re: #238 boofar
Who knows? Why not? Nunya bidness! pick one! :)

252 Jim in Virginia  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:15:43pm

re: #134 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Thanks!

re: #237 Josephine

Pfhhhhhhhhhht.

How many papers have they had published?

And who peer reviewed them?

253 Nevergiveup  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:15:57pm

"Gillerman bids UN farewell: Israel will prevail
Israeli Ambassador Gillerman bids United Nations farewell in emotional speech; Israel contributes to mankind everyday, he says, adds that he is most frightened by Muslim world's 'eerie silence' in face of terrorism"

It's worth the read.

[Link: www.ynetnews.com...]

254 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:16:02pm

I use to be agnostic, but now I'm not so sure.

255 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:16:07pm

re: #239 Reno911

Now if you could just tie-in Islam, Creationism, shredding musical instruments, cycling, and iphones...in one magical post...everyone would be satisfied.

You left out the Obamessiah!

256 Inquisitive  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:16:12pm

re: #98 pingjockey

What? George doesn't have a brain? Hahaha, the line in Ghost Busters just flashed in my head.


Ah..George is a...no brainer.

257 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:16:21pm

re: #251 pingjockey

Who knows? Why not? Nunya bidness! pick one! :)

Kinda need evidence that others can analyze and concur with you :) .

258 Racer X  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:16:46pm

George cannot take any more questions right now. He's on the phone with the Pope. Got some splainin' to do.

259 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:17:10pm

re: #240 Thanos

George,

Glad to see you are back. You still have some unanswered questions from the other night. Lucky for you someone else answered one, so I'll let you off the hook on that.

Now, do you have an example of something that's irreducibly complex, a new one that hasn't been thoroughly debunked already?

Simple question, you should be able to answer.

He left.

Question, the other night toward the end of a thread you mentioned something about Malcolm Wallop. Just kind of curious what that was about. I lived in Wy during his tenure.

260 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:17:27pm

re: #252 Jim in Virginia
I don't know who would be the Popes' peer.

261 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:17:32pm

re: #237 Josephine

George Silvers- more learned on the word of God than the Pope and St Augustine combined!

262 Inquisitive  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:17:33pm

re: #105 jcm

I worked at a dairy farm....
I can Pile it Higher and Deeper too.

1000 good dings for you and your PHD.

263 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:17:45pm

re: #250 tokyobk

But this would make you agnostic, right? I think most people who call themselves athiest are not anti-thiest like Hitchens.

In my opinon there could be a God and I kind of hope there is, its just the descriptions of God so far seem so abviously human and the various thumbprints of different cultures are so obviously all over the founding texts, ditto their limited understanding of the world around them.

I think if God spoke to Hitchens directly he would have himself committed before he believed. That is an athiest. There is no God and he is sure of it no matter what, just as a thiest cannot be waterboarded into giving up their faith.

When I say joining a religion, it's more like joining the good effort that those particular people are taking part in. If I really did hear voices or see stuff, I'd commit myself.

264 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:18:28pm

re: #254 Walter L. Newton

I use to be agnostic, but now I'm not so sure.

My sentiments exactly.

265 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:18:31pm

re: #254 Walter L. Newton

I use to be agnostic, but now I'm not so sure.

Groan

266 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:18:49pm

re: #238 boofar

Maybe God lit the fuse

267 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:18:52pm

As I have said before, I think one reason that ID people cannot tolerate a real discussion of their 'theory' is a basic fear of eternal oblivion after they die. Heck, it scares me too. However, rather than comfort myself by ceasing all intellectual questioning, I comfort myself by the fact that I made it through the eternity of oblivion that preceded my birth. So what the heck, I can do it again!

268 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:18:59pm

re: #252 Jim in Virginia

And who peer reviewed them?

Ummmmm... God?

/

269 theparson  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:19:19pm

re: #248 Josephine

Gaze nystagmus only occurs when someone is intoxicated or has brain damage. However, there is a totality of clues. Along with the Standardized Field Sobriety Test there are other clues. The odor of alcohol, slurred speech, presence of alcohol containers and etc. There is really only one condition that can confuse a seasoned officer and that is Diabetes which can fool even the most experienced officer.

270 Thanos  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:19:25pm

One of the things that Discovery Institute does with regularity is couch their arguments in terms of old controversies in evolution, and they tend to set their terms in language that someone who took evolutionary biology 20-40 years ago might understand. This fuzzes many issues, since evolutionary biology has progressed greatly in that time.

If you are a bit rusty, and don't understand the changes since you had bio, here's a quick simple overview that's online. It's one kids can understand you won't find it over your head because you are a lizard, and lizards are smart.

The sections on phylogeny vs. linnaen taxonomy is particularly worth reading.

271 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:20:08pm

re: #257 boofar
No, no... A multiple guess answer.
Q was the Big Bang God?
A Who knows
B Why not
C Nunya bidness
D all of the above
I was just being silly.

272 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:20:40pm

One more thing.

Even though I am an atheist, it actually does piss me off when other atheists talk of theists as retards or idiots. Some people try to compromise and find common ground between faith and science in their private lives. And who are we to judge? It's their private lives and they're not forcing their beliefs on others. Otherwise fervently believe that science is not enough to explain most of the things out there. That's fine too, just as long as others are not forced or tricked into going down that line (and yes, teaching intelligent design in the classroom as a scientifically possible theory is dishonest.)

273 tokyobk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:20:53pm

re: #267 Gordon Marock

As I have said before, I think one reason that ID people cannot tolerate a real discussion of their 'theory' is a basic fear of eternal oblivion after they die. Heck, it scares me too. However, rather than comfort myself by ceasing all intellectual questioning, I comfort myself by the fact that I made it through the eternity of oblivion that preceded my birth. So what the heck, I can do it again!

Amen. (which is a contraction of I believe). I am only conforted by the thought that being here now proves that death is not eternal.

274 Bacchus's daddy  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:21:01pm

re: #20 george slivers

I would love a "non-circular" explanation as to how Darwinism is full of "circular" reasoning.

275 harpsicon  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:21:11pm

re: #37 Charles

Well, you know, for those complaining that I'm not focusing like a laser on Islamic terrorism, you might consider this a "tie-in."

Exactly!

Why do I suspect that we won't hear anything that sounds like rational scientific thought coming from those guys...

276 Thanos  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:21:35pm

re: #259 Mars Needs Neocons

He left.

Question, the other night toward the end of a thread you mentioned something about Malcolm Wallop. Just kind of curious what that was about. I lived in Wy during his tenure.

I was researching some of the folks allied with Christopher Monckton's anti global warming group. I didn't find any dirt there, and Wallop seems like a good guy.

277 Reno911  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:21:36pm

re: #267 Gordon Marock

I comfort myself by the fact that I made it through the eternity of oblivion that preceded my birth.

I'm digging that.

278 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:21:45pm

re: #266 Ojoe

Maybe God lit the fuse

It's possible. But you need pretty solid evidence :) .

279 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:21:59pm

re: #273 tokyobk

Amen. (which is a contraction of I believe). I am only conforted by the thought that being here now proves that death is not eternal.

Yes, and when I hold my son in my lap and see him smile, I need no other proofs.

280 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:22:18pm

re: #271 pingjockey

No, no... A multiple guess answer.
Q was the Big Bang God?
A Who knows
B Why not
C Nunya bidness
D all of the above
I was just being silly.

1) What's Nunya?
2) No multiple guesses :p .

281 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:22:38pm

re: #238 boofar

Was the Big Bang God?

God said "Let there be light"
Initially after the big bang it was all energy, no matter.

Can't prove it. Jus' sayin'.

And the big five extinction events; End Ordovician, Late Devonian, End Permian, End Triassic, and End Cretaceous, divided time into six periods of development.

Can't prove any of it. Wouldn't teach it. Just little things that pop up in looking at it all.

282 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:22:41pm

re: #276 Thanos

I was researching some of the folks allied with Christopher Monckton's anti global warming group. I didn't find any dirt there, and Wallop seems like a good guy.

He is. He's really a very grounded rational person. Wyoming is usually good that way, hell even their Dem politicians are usually pretty smart, sane, and grounded people.

283 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:23:08pm

re: #274 Bacchus's daddy

I would love a "non-circular" explanation as to how Darwinism is full of "circular" reasoning.

Georgie-Poo has logged out.

/th' coward

284 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:23:22pm

re: #266 Ojoe

Maybe God lit the fuse

Are you implying that God is a terrorist bomber?

285 theparson  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:23:24pm

At this point I would like to announce that I do have all the answers.
I just don't know what the questions are.

286 Truck Monkey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:23:35pm

re: #260 pingjockey

I don't know who would be the Popes' peer.

Ron Paul

287 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:23:42pm

re: #281 jcm

God said "Let there be light"
Initially after the big bang it was all energy, no matter.

Can't prove it. Jus' sayin'.

That's philosophy. Different ballgame altogether.

288 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:24:03pm

re: #280 boofar
Nunya = none of your business.
I had to rewrite a whole damn sonar electronics curriculum into multiple guess because essay answers to electronic faults and trouble shooting were too damn long.

289 tokyobk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:24:24pm

re: #277 Reno911

I'm digging that.

I also get comfort by the thought that in a sense we all die at the same time. The span of time between my grandpoppy passing in 1991 and when I kick it hopefully at 95 and in good health is infinitesimal. That could also be a scary thought, but I like the thought of not being alone in the ultimate lone experience.

290 Throbert McGee  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:24:35pm

re: #238 boofar

Was the Big Bang God?

The Big Bang happened shortly after God looked at the previous version of the Universe and said "Oh, fuck this mess."

;-)

291 Thanos  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:24:37pm

re: #282 Mars Needs Neocons

He was a bit ahead of his time in trying to get a post cold war doctrine established. Wish folks had of listened to him. He seems a bit like Goldwater but without the populist streak.

292 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:24:54pm

re: #284 Ford_Prefect
Nope. A juvenile deliquent with a giant M-80.

293 HoosierHoops  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:25:07pm

re: #285 theparson

At this point I would like to announce that I do have all the answers.
I just don't know what the questions are.

great line!

294 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:25:25pm

re: #285 theparson

At this point I would like to announce that I do have all the answers.
I just don't know what the questions are.

I used to have all the answers, but I seem to have misplaced them.

295 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:25:33pm

re: #266 Ojoe

Maybe God lit the fuse

I feel like you are channeling Billy Joel

We didn't start the fire
It was always burning
Since the world's been turning
We didn't start the fire
No we didn't light it
But we tried to fight it

296 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:25:37pm

re: #288 pingjockey

Nunya = none of your business.
I had to rewrite a whole damn sonar electronics curriculum into multiple guess because essay answers to electronic faults and trouble shooting were too damn long.

dive-bombing is easy

/AT-N Class A, NAS Memphis

297 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:25:40pm

re: #254 Walter L. Newton

I use to be agnostic, but now I'm not so sure.

Oh, I used to be disgusted...

298 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:25:45pm

re: #290 Throbert McGee
Ahahahahahaha!

299 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:25:54pm

re: #288 pingjockey

Nunya = none of your business.


Ahh

I had to rewrite a whole damn sonar electronics curriculum into multiple guess because essay answers to electronic faults and trouble shooting were too damn long.


What? Why?

300 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:26:23pm

re: #290 Throbert McGee

The Big Bang happened shortly after God looked at the previous version of the Universe and said "Oh, fuck this mess."

;-)

That works as an explanation :p ^_^ .

301 paint-right  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:26:34pm

re: #53 Sharmuta

I think LudwigVanQuixote put it best just now on the thread downstairs:

Can Ludwig get an Amen?

amen!

302 bloodnok  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:26:54pm

re: #238 boofar

Was the Big Bang God?

Pop Rocks 'n Coke

303 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:26:57pm

re: #254 Walter L. Newton

I use to be agnostic, but now I'm not so sure.

You hear about the agnostic, dyslexic, insomniac?

He lay awake at night pondering the existence of dog.

304 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:27:01pm

re: #296 pre-Boomer Marine brat
Sure, rub it in.

305 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:27:25pm

re: #302 bloodnok

Pop Rocks 'n Coke

Tell that to Mikey, god rest his soul.

306 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:27:29pm

re: #290 Throbert McGee

The Big Bang happened shortly after God looked at the previous version of the Universe and said "Oh, fuck this mess."

;-)

ROFL!

307 CyanSnowHawk  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:27:30pm

re: #290 Throbert McGee

The Big Bang happened shortly after God looked at the previous version of the Universe and said "Oh, fuck this mess."

;-)

Mandy is God?

308 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:28:01pm

re: #290 Throbert McGee

The Big Bang happened shortly after God looked at the previous version of the Universe and said "Oh, fuck this mess."

;-)

Y'know, I'd love to change the world and make it better. So that we don't have to-reformat with a big bang again. But God won't give me the source code :( .

309 Annar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:28:04pm

re: #267 Gordon Marock

As I have said before, I think one reason that ID people cannot tolerate a real discussion of their 'theory' is a basic fear of eternal oblivion after they die. Heck, it scares me too. However, rather than comfort myself by ceasing all intellectual questioning, I comfort myself by the fact that I made it through the eternity of oblivion that preceded my birth. So what the heck, I can do it again!

I think Mark Twain said something to that effect.

310 Boondock St. Bender  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:28:35pm

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk

can't be,all us guys would look like george cloony

311 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:28:42pm

re: #290 Throbert McGee

The Big Bang happened shortly after God looked at the previous version of the Universe and said "Oh, fuck this mess."

;-)

"It will just have to go... "

:-)

312 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:28:55pm

re: #254 Walter L. Newton

I use to be agnostic, but now I'm not so sure.

I know what I am. A lesbian in a man's body.

:D

/i know i know
/i'll go to bed now
/long day tomorrow >_>

313 NR Pax  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:28:56pm

If you all don't mind, I'm going to copy something written by Howard Tayler, the artist behind the webcomic Schlock Mercenary. For those who have never heard of him, Howard is a very devout Christian and an intelligent man with a razor sharp wit. This is part of what he said about Intelligent Design.

I believe that eventually our science will be good enough that we can explain to God how we think He did it, and He’ll say “Great job! You get an A! It would have been an A+, but you left ‘Dark Energy’ in place as a fudge factor. Now here’s a nebula full of hydrogen. Show Me what you can build.” Until then, however, I’m not going to use the book of Genesis as a template for a scientific theory. The answers may be in The Book, but we’re expected to show our work. That’s the only way that we can enjoy the fruits of DOING the work.

For those who wish to read the whole tangent, you can find it here.

314 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:29:12pm

re: #303 jcm

You hear about the agnostic, dyslexic, insomniac?

He lay awake at night pondering the existence of dog.

I would give my left arm to be ambidextrous.

315 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:29:16pm

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk

Mandy is God?

ROFLMAO!

316 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:29:30pm

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk

Mandy is God?

*Whack*

(Someone had to do it in her absence.)

317 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:29:43pm

re: #309 Annar

I think Mark Twain said something to that effect.

Prove it. Or, more appropriately, disprove it.

318 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:30:02pm

re: #299 boofar
Some of the kids figured out that if they wrote enough about the circuit and not what caused it to fail they could get by. Plus it was eating up serious time grading papers. Plus we would get into seriously involved arguements over whether some of the failures were actually real world problems, not engineers fantasies.

319 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:30:30pm

re: #313 NR Pax

If you all don't mind, I'm going to copy something written by Howard Tayler, the artist behind the webcomic Schlock Mercenary. For those who have never heard of him, Howard is a very devout Christian and an intelligent man with a razor sharp wit. This is part of what he said about Intelligent Design.

I believe that eventually our science will be good enough that we can explain to God how we think He did it, and He’ll say “Great job! You get an A! It would have been an A+, but you left ‘Dark Energy’ in place as a fudge factor. Now here’s a nebula full of hydrogen. Show Me what you can build.” Until then, however, I’m not going to use the book of Genesis as a template for a scientific theory. The answers may be in The Book, but we’re expected to show our work. That’s the only way that we can enjoy the fruits of DOING the work.

For those who wish to read the whole tangent, you can find it here.

Well, it's fine that he's questioning it. But he's not teaching it as the defacto fact in a science classroom :) .

320 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:31:02pm

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk

Mandy is God?

That must be how she's able to piss up ropes.

321 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:31:05pm

re: #307 CyanSnowHawk

Mandy is God?

Mandy?

/born outside of US
/don't know all the cultural tid-bits

322 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:31:20pm

re: #261 Sharmuta

George Silvers- more learned on the word of God than the Pope and St Augustine combined!

Hey, he could use that blurb on the cover of one of his papers!

323 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:31:55pm

OK. Time for bed and a little reading of America's First Freedom. Goodnight.

324 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:32:27pm

re: #323 Gordon Marock
Night

325 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:32:28pm

re: #318 pingjockey

Some of the kids figured out that if they wrote enough about the circuit and not what caused it to fail they could get by. Plus it was eating up serious time grading papers. Plus we would get into seriously involved arguements over whether some of the failures were actually real world problems, not engineers fantasies.

Well, if you're the teacher, then you can pretty much have total power over whether the kid gets an A or fails outright. At the end of the day I'd just give him the grade that I think he deserves and that's that.

326 CapeCoddah  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:32:30pm

Darn, modem issues. Did George take his ball and go home again? The moron.

327 Throbert McGee  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:32:49pm

re: #272 boofar

One more thing.

Even though I am an atheist, it actually does piss me off when other atheists talk of theists as retards or idiots.

It pisses me off a little, too -- but the annoyance factor of hearing atheists say "theists are idiots" is somewhat mitigated by the thousand and one times I've heard theists say "oh, atheists only deny God so that they can have immoral sex without going to Hell."

In either case, it's a pathetic way to argue.

328 Gordon Marock  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:32:51pm

re: #313 NR Pax

If you all don't mind, I'm going to copy something written by Howard Tayler, the artist behind the webcomic Schlock Mercenary. For those who have never heard of him, Howard is a very devout Christian and an intelligent man with a razor sharp wit. This is part of what he said about Intelligent Design.

I believe that eventually our science will be good enough that we can explain to God how we think He did it, and He’ll say “Great job! You get an A! It would have been an A+, but you left ‘Dark Energy’ in place as a fudge factor. Now here’s a nebula full of hydrogen. Show Me what you can build.” Until then, however, I’m not going to use the book of Genesis as a template for a scientific theory. The answers may be in The Book, but we’re expected to show our work. That’s the only way that we can enjoy the fruits of DOING the work.

For those who wish to read the whole tangent, you can find it here.

Hey, whoever said the Bible doesn't have a teacher's edition.

329 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:32:53pm

re: #320 Sharmuta

That must be how she's able to piss up ropes.

Good point. That is especially hard for a woman.

330 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:33:39pm

re: #304 pingjockey

Sure, rub it in.

Heh!

Once applied for a job long-distance. The hiring supervisor sent me a 20 question technical test (non-multiple choice, including simple circuit design) which I completed and returned to him. Then he called and spent a hour getting me to explain, IN DETAIL, how I came up with each answer.

(I'm overly proud to say that he went to management to get a face-to-face interview requirement waived in order to hire me.)

Essay is the only way to find out what someone really KNOWS.

331 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:33:41pm

re: #327 Throbert McGee

It pisses me off a little, too -- but the annoyance factor of hearing atheists say "theists are idiots" is somewhat mitigated by the thousand and one times I've heard theists say "oh, atheists only deny God so that they can have immoral sex without going to Hell."

In either case, it's a pathetic way to argue.

Two sides of the same coin.

332 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:34:14pm

re: #291 Thanos

He was a bit ahead of his time in trying to get a post cold war doctrine established. Wish folks had of listened to him. He seems a bit like Goldwater but without the populist streak.

Wyoming has a great rep of this kind of political thought.

Malcolm Wallop, Craig Thomas, Alan Simpson (kinda aristo though), Ed Herschler (actually a dem), and of course Dick Cheney.

333 Spiny Norman  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:34:21pm

re: #290 Throbert McGee

ROTFLMAO!

=^D

334 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:34:41pm

re: #314 Walter L. Newton

I would give my left arm to be ambidextrous.

LOL

335 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:34:52pm

re: #325 boofar
That was about it. But we wanted the kids to have real world problems they'd see at sea. not lab problems.

336 NR Pax  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:34:56pm

re: #319 boofar

Well, it's fine that he's questioning it. But he's not teaching it as the defacto fact in a science classroom :) .

True. But he does go off rather well about why ID isn't a science. Besides, I had to post that part of the rant for the enjoyment of fellow lizards. -:-)

337 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:35:04pm

re: #318 pingjockey

Some of the kids figured out that if they wrote enough about the circuit and not what caused it to fail they could get by. Plus it was eating up serious time grading papers. Plus we would get into seriously involved arguements over whether some of the failures were actually real world problems, not engineers fantasies.

I just a PCB I designed back from the board house, for IC testing. 4" x 4", gold immersion, 50 ohm controlled impedance, 20 layers. $1000 a pop.

God I hope the thing works ;-P

338 HoosierHoops  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:35:27pm

re: #321 boofar

Mandy?

/born outside of US
/don't know all the cultural tid-bits

watch the movie..we are marshall

then you'll understand we are mandy

339 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:35:39pm

re: #284 Ford_Prefect

No, this is all speculation, and God stands outside of Creation anyhow, and outside of time, and the big bang is a time thing.

Actually, the mystic Julian of Norwich, in a vision was there with the Creator and He let her hold this little round thing, it was the size of a hazlenut, in her hand; she asked what it was, and the answer was that it was all that is created.

So the universe may appear differently, and it depends on who you are with.


Julian of Norwich

The universe

340 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:36:21pm

re: #330 pre-Boomer Marine brat
That is true, however the time factor was really mucking things up. I liked the essay answers.

341 Salamantis  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:36:38pm

re: #20 george slivers

A theist who accepts darwinian evolution is ignorant, a liar, or a fool.

There is not room for an "intelligent designer" in RANDOM mutation or NATURAL selection.

The only logical basis and conclusion of Darwinism is philosophical materialism. But arguments based on circular reasoning are the hallmark of Darwinists.

Congratulations, George; you just called most Christians in the world ignorant, liars or fools. And you also put their God in a box by saying that deity is not strong or smart enough to set initial conditions according to will and know and desire what would ensue. So much for omnipotence and omniscience.

Let's talk about the FACTUAL basis for evolutionary theory; alla that empirical evidence, mountains and oceans of it. But Oh, No, you don't wanna talk about the real; you just wanna stay in your little "The Bible said it and the Bible is infallible because the Bible said that, too, so it must be true" two-step circular unreasoning loop.

342 CapeCoddah  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:37:06pm

re: #260 pingjockey
Actually, since he was just elected by and from among them, I would guess the College of Cardinals would probably be His Holiness' peers.

343 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:37:10pm

re: #338 HoosierHoops

watch the movie..we are marshall

then you'll understand we are mandy

*sigh* Now all that I gotta find is free time.

344 Josephine  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:37:11pm

re: #269 theparson

That's interesting; thanks.

I get nystagmus with benign positional vertigo. My brain scans have all been normal, though.

My brother is diabetic. He's got one of those: "I'm not drunk, please force-feed me with sugar and call 9-11" cards.

345 goddessoftheclassroom  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:37:34pm

re: #330 pre-Boomer Marine brat

I was so hoping you'd be here...

[Link: icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com...]

MWAH!

346 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:37:39pm

re: #337 jcm
Good lord. 4 x4, is it a motherboard?

347 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:38:36pm

re: #337 jcm

I just a PCB I designed back from the board house, for IC testing. 4" x 4", gold immersion, 50 ohm controlled impedance, 20 layers. $1000 a pop.

God I hope the thing works ;-P

Anyone here who does software? :P

Hardware was never my thing.

348 sparrowlake  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:38:47pm

re: #37 Charles

Well, you know, for those complaining that I'm not focusing like a laser on Islamic terrorism, you might consider this a "tie-in."

It sure is a major tie-in.
Which is more troubling for the protagonists in the GWOT:
1. An alliance between Islamist extremists and Christian IDers to discredit science; or,
2. A pissing contest between Creationists and Darwinists over eachothers' shortcomings?

Answer (IMO): An alliance between supporters of terror and powerful elements of the major Western religions is infinitely more dangerous than even a very nasty debate between two legitimate foundational elements of Western society.

349 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:39:06pm

re: #335 pingjockey

That was about it. But we wanted the kids to have real world problems they'd see at sea. not lab problems.

Then what'd you do which would make them run out of the classroom and hang over the balcony railing?

Yeah, I was on a flat-top, but I saw tin cans aft of us, taking water over B Turret.

350 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:39:19pm

re: #321 boofar

MandyManners- one of LGFs most beloved posters.

351 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:39:19pm

re: #342 CapeCoddah
Damn, that is right. Liked the Anthony Quinn flic where he becomes the Pope.

352 Annar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:39:39pm

re: #317 Gordon Marock

The exact Mark Twain quote is
"I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it."

Found here.

353 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:39:51pm

re: #339 Ojoe

Ooo0kaay. You see this is why I am an agnostic. This kind of thinking upstream through the river of logic takes way too much effort.

354 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:40:24pm

re: #322 Josephine

Hey, he could use that blurb on the cover of one of his papers!

He probably already does.

355 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:40:40pm

re: #340 pingjockey

That is true, however the time factor was really mucking things up. I liked the essay answers.

I saw your comment about that a little ways up. In a classroom setting, time is certainly a factor. You have my empathy.

356 Salamantis  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:40:49pm

re: #52 Josephine

We're not Christians if we don't believe the way he believes.

You're just not Christian ENOUGH for Ol' George...;~)

357 CIA Reject  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:41:03pm

re: #215 boofar

Well... yeh.

Actually I wasn't trying to be tautological. My beef with the ID people is that in the process of trying to ram fundamentalism down the public throat they are also trying to make Faith unnecessary.

That is, at best, an act of spiritual cowardice and at worst an act of Evil.

And as a person of Faith I find the former possibility insulting and the latter possibility downright frightening.

The connection to islam is not accidental.

358 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:42:00pm

re: #346 pingjockey

Good lord. 4 x4, is it a motherboard?

Inches.

The mother board is 12" x 12" 'bout half done on that beast.

359 CapeCoddah  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:42:11pm

re: #351 pingjockey
Missed that film. Which one is that?

360 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:42:15pm

re: #350 Sharmuta

MandyManners- one of LGFs most beloved posters.

Ahh

It's easy to screw with my head when it comes to these things :) .

361 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:42:18pm

re: #337 jcm

I just a PCB I designed back from the board house, for IC testing. 4" x 4", gold immersion, 50 ohm controlled impedance, 20 layers. $1000 a pop.

God I hope the thing works ;-P

What about that one pin which you forgot to ground?

*diving out the window*

362 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:42:52pm

re: #349 pre-Boomer Marine brat
Mwahahaha! That is fun! Not fun, trying to troubleshoot in forward sonar, with the gear lit off and a sea state of 5+ and trying to keep the o-scope, multimeter, and yourself from sliding fore and aft and port and starboard and trying to figure out why the goddamn own doppler nullifier circuit isn't working!

363 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:43:21pm

re: #339 Ojoe

Julian!

364 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:44:09pm

[Link: abclocal.go.com...]

Conspiracy theory in 3... 2... 1...

365 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:44:09pm

re: #360 boofar

I'm here to help. :)

366 goddessoftheclassroom  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:44:31pm

re: #363 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Please see #345 above...

367 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:44:34pm

re: #355 pre-Boomer Marine brat
That was, OMG...1990 to 1993. Time has flown. I've been retired 11 years and that doesn't seem possible either.

368 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:45:44pm

re: #359 CapeCoddah
The Shoes of the Fisherman. 1960s Quinn is a Cardinal released from a Soviet gulag and ends up pope.

369 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:46:08pm

re: #361 pre-Boomer Marine brat

What about that one pin which you forgot to ground?

*diving out the window*

Which ground? It's got analog ground, digitial ground, IO ground, signal ground and a chassis ground.

370 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:46:23pm

[Link: www.news.com.au...]

More fun stuff.

371 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:46:36pm

re: #345 goddessoftheclassroom

I was so hoping you'd be here...

[Link: icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com.. .]

MWAH!

ROFL!

MWAH!

See the links here:
re: #214 pre-Boomer Marine brat

372 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:46:59pm

re: #364 boofar

[Link: abclocal.go.com...]

Conspiracy theory in 3... 2... 1...

RP was ran out things to say?

373 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:47:05pm

re: #369 jcm
Go for the big one, chassis ground!

374 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:47:08pm

re: #353 Ford_Prefect

It does not seem to take much effort as I see it, but that is me.

re: #363 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Julian is one of the best

375 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:48:14pm

re: #372 jcm

RP was ran out things to say?

That would be the day.

376 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:49:29pm

re: #373 pingjockey

Go for the big one, chassis ground!

LOL!
Let it float!

377 CapeCoddah  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:50:11pm

re: #368 pingjockey
Heard of it, never seen it. Not big on religious movies, since my grandmother watched The 10 commandments, The Robe, and a couple of others incessantly for the 41 years I have known her. She still does. Since I gave up organized religion for Lent 25 years ago, I probably wont see it, but, thanks for the info. (I DO believe in God, though, for the record, and am NOT a creationist, or a young earth nut.)

378 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:50:19pm

re: #372 jcm

RP was ran out things to say?

No, it lost cabin pressure because he sucked all the air out with his incessant yapping.

379 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:50:48pm

re: #376 jcm
I used to hate that shit. Floating grounds my eye! Heh.

380 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:51:33pm

re: #374 Ojoe

It does not seem to take much effort as I see it, but that is me.

re: #363 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Julian is one of the best

Please don't take my comment as being critical. I respect people of faith, as long as they are resonable about and don't use it to justify acts of violence or tyranny. I genuinely find the whole thing to much of a mental balancing act for myself. I was brought up catholic and spent 12 years in catholic schools, and then simply realized that I didn't really believe it all.

381 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:51:58pm

re: #378 Mars Needs Neocons

No, it lost cabin pressure because he sucked all the air out with his incessant yapping.

I wonder if he paid the FBO (Fixed Base Operator) who fixed the plane in gold.

382 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:52:00pm

re: #357 CIA Reject

One hundred updings for your post.
Especially:

they are also trying to make Faith unnecessary...

383 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:52:34pm

re: #369 jcm

Which ground? It's got analog ground, digitial ground, IO ground, signal ground and a chassis ground.

Whot th' hell, ground is ground.

/hoping like hell he takes the probably too-obvious bait

Signal ground sounds like you've got VERY-low-level analog. Tie it to the IO driver ground.

/the Song of Mehitabel ... Whot th' hell, whot th' hell

384 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:52:52pm

re: #381 jcm

I wonder if he paid the FBO (Fixed Base Operator) who fixed the plane in gold.

lol

385 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:53:41pm

re: #380 Ford_Prefect

No offense taken.

I was raised Catholic too,

I'm a baaaaaad one at this point, I just take the good stuff.

386 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:53:52pm

re: #381 jcm
Is Luap Nor carrying gold around instead of money?

387 CapeCoddah  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:54:13pm

re: #381 jcm
Good one. LOL

388 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:54:16pm

re: #374 Ojoe

Can't remember, and dang it, didn't make note of who it was.
Did you give me the following biblio data a few weeks ago?

The revelations of.... Norwich...
Translated, with a new introduction, by
M.L. del Mastro
Burns & Oates (England)
Reprinted 1995
ISBN 0 86102 232 8

389 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:55:25pm

re: #388 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Yes, I have a copy.

It is quite readable, the original writing is in very archaic english.

390 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:55:49pm

re: #379 pingjockey

I used to hate that shit. Floating grounds my eye! Heh.

A floating ground almost cost us our HP account a few years a ago (only a few million a quarter). A floating ground pin was building up a potential, then as it was unplugged zorching stuff.

391 pingjockey  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:56:00pm

BBIAB, the 'boss'; 8 yr old, wants to go to the xformers website. That is very important stuff! :)

392 Salamantis  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:56:38pm

re: #74 George Slivers

re: #34 CyanSnowHawk

Strong words about the Pope there george, make sure you don't cause a Catholic seeth.

George: The pope probably doesn't understand Darwinian evolution given the campaign of "bait and switch" used to mislead theists.

Typically it goes like this.

Darwinists:Look antibiotic resistance, that's evolution.
Theist: Sounds good I'll bite.
Darwinists: Oh by the way, now that you accept evolution, you must realize that the world and all it entails is due to chance and natural laws.

Evolutionary theorists: Look; Transitional Fossils! Look; DNA! Look; Artifactual Retroviral DNA, too! Look; Repeatable-at-Will Evolution in Laboratories! Look; Millions of kids don't get rickets any more because we spliced a Vitamin-A-making gene into the rice chromosome! Look! We are figuring out how to tailor viruses to splice out heritable defects and splice in healthy sequences, so that nobody's kids will have to suffer from inherited defects any more!

Theists: I'd have to be a real dunce not to accept alla this! The future look so bright, I gotta wear shades! But what about God? I'm real fond of tha Big Guy, yaknow...

Evolutionary theorists: We don't address metaphysical assertions of religious faith; only the empirically testable facts of the physical universe.

Theists: Waay Kewl, Dewde! Sign me Up! And I'll be prayin' for y'all to figure the rest of it out; that kinda knowledge can only be big-time great for humankind!

393 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:56:52pm

Out, and to some work.

Carry on...

394 boofar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:57:42pm

Night guys.

395 Ford_Prefect  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:58:15pm

re: #385 Ojoe

I found myself in church one Sunday while the congregation read the Apostolic creed, and I just noticed how many people seemed to be saying the words without paying any attention to what they were saying. I realized that I was doing the same thing. So I spent the rest of the mass reading it over and over and finally decided that I just didn't believe it. It wasn't so much that I believed it was all untrue; I just didn't feel that faith that it was true. And twenty some odd years later I still don't.

396 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:58:56pm

re: #383 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Whot th' hell, ground is ground.

/hoping like hell he takes the probably too-obvious bait

Signal ground sounds like you've got VERY-low-level analog. Tie it to the IO driver ground.

/the Song of Mehitabel ... Whot th' hell, whot th' hell

I won't tell you how many hours when spent in meetings on the grounding schemes. We keep all separate in case the test protocol required, but put in chokes, bypasses to tie them together if need be.

Where looking at signals in the nV range.

397 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:59:00pm

re: #389 Ojoe

Thanks. I just made note of the source.

I'd ordered a copy of the Penguin edition (short and long text) that evening after you'd mentioned it. Then you gave me that biblio. Still have it. Will explore it. I expect that the library at Perkins/SMU has a copy. Might head past there the next time I'm toward downtown.

398 Throbert McGee  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 6:59:56pm

re: #309 Annar

a basic fear of eternal oblivion after [death]. Heck, it scares me too. However... I comfort myself by the fact that I made it through the eternity of oblivion that preceded my birth.

I think Mark Twain said something to that effect.

I don't know about Mark Twain, but Seneca the Younger (4 BC - 65 AD) said something along very similar lines (my emphasis added):

Would you not think a man an utter fool if he wept because he was not alive a thousand years ago? He who weeps because he will not be alive a thousand years from now is just as much a fool. It is all the same; you will not be, and you were not. Neither of these periods of time belongs to you. -- Seneca the Younger, Epistle 77

399 goddessoftheclassroom  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:01:44pm

re: #395 Ford_Prefect

I found myself in church one Sunday while the congregation read the Apostolic creed, and I just noticed how many people seemed to be saying the words without paying any attention to what they were saying. I realized that I was doing the same thing. So I spent the rest of the mass reading it over and over and finally decided that I just didn't believe it. It wasn't so much that I believed it was all untrue; I just didn't feel that faith that it was true. And twenty some odd years later I still don't.

I'm very sorry. I do believe it.

400 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:02:48pm

re: #396 jcm

nV range.

Whot th' hell, got any IO's driving electromagnetic relays at the end of 500 feet of field wiring? Ground is ground.

401 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:06:15pm

re: #399 goddessoftheclassroom

goddess,

This dog is going to try to land on his feet as he bails out in just a few. Did you see the Phil Harris links I gave to PingJockey up-thread?

MWAH!

402 melinwy  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:06:54pm

re: #22 CyanSnowHawk

2
Click quote on this comment and you will see the superscript html tag.

re: #99 Sharmuta

St Augustine

great link, thank you so much Sharmuta.

403 goddessoftheclassroom  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:07:11pm

re: #401 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Yes--what fun!

404 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:08:05pm

re: #400 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Whot th' hell, got any IO's driving electromagnetic relays at the end of 500 feet of field wiring? Ground is ground.

Tell that the bloody chip designers. They stuff on this crap onto an IC I get to come up with the hardware to test it. We've taken an Harvard processor, analog and digital IO's, SRAM and stuffed it all onto a single IC.

Analog and digital don't like being that close.

405 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:09:59pm

re: #402 melinwy

You're welcome!

406 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:10:09pm

re: #404 jcm

Tell that the bloody chip designers. They stuff on this crap onto an IC I get to come up with the hardware to test it. We've taken an Harvard processor, analog and digital IO's, SRAM and stuffed it all onto a single IC.

Analog and digital don't like being that close.

One outta two ain't bad. The digital circuits don't give a rat's *ss about it.

/digital is sheer barbarism

407 Annar  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:11:29pm

re: #398 Throbert McGee

I agree with Seneca and what's more unwillingness to face the finality of death is religion's principal nourishment.

408 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:14:20pm

re: #403 goddessoftheclassroom

Yes--what fun!

I have bit and pieces of memories of movies from the 40's and very early 50's, like Durante singing "The Thing".

They made a "Lil' Abner" movie. I remember my folks taking me to see it when I was in 2nd or 3rd grade. I guess I was too young to ... ur ... appreciate Daisy Mae. Don't remember her from it.

409 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:15:52pm

re: #406 pre-Boomer Marine brat

One outta two ain't bad. The digital circuits don't give a rat's *ss about it.

/digital is sheer barbarism

Hah!
You a radar guy or comm?

410 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:19:10pm

re: #409 jcm

Hah!
You a radar guy or comm?

Avionics in the Navy in the 60's. High fidelity while in college. Sr. tech in a McIntosh dealership. Then Burr-Brown's Test Equip Engrg group. Then other places in OEM-land, with a substantial amount of analog.

I have one of these in my keepsake box.

411 Salamantis  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:21:51pm

re: #228 CIA Reject

G*d invented random!

Or does the Universe play dice with God?

412 jcm  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:24:24pm

re: #410 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Avionics in the Navy in the 60's. High fidelity while in college. Sr. tech in a McIntosh dealership. Then Burr-Brown's Test Equip Engrg group. Then other places in OEM-land, with a substantial amount of analog.

I have one of these in my keepsake box.

Cool!

Working on the next gen of this guy. Click overview tab.

413 Salamantis  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:26:44pm

re: #254 Walter L. Newton

I use to be agnostic, but now I'm not so sure.

A friend of mine describes himself as a retired agnostic; he says he doesn't know, and he doesn't give a damn any more.

414 JeremyR  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:26:45pm

re: #21 jcm
MY VERSION


Application for Permission to Date My Daughter
NOTE: This application will be incomplete and rejected unless accompanied by a complete financial statement,
job history, lineage, and current medical report from your doctor.
NAME____________________________________ _ DOB_____________
HEIGHT___________ WEIGHT____________ IQ__________ GPA_____________
SOCIAL SECURITY #_________________ DRIVERS LICENSE #________________
BOY SCOUT RANK AND BADGES__________________________________ ________
HOME ADDRESS_______________________ CITY/STATE___________ ZIP______
Do you have parents? ___Yes ___No
Is one male and the other female? ___Yes ___No
If No, explain: ________________________________________ _____________________
Number of years they have been married ______________________________
If less than your age, explain
________________________________________ ____________________________

ACCESSORIES SECTION:
A. Do you own or have access to a van? __Yes __No
B. A truck with oversized tires? __Yes __No
C. A waterbed? __Yes __No
D. A pickup with a mattress in the back? __Yes __No
E. A tattoo? __Yes __No
F. Do you have an earring, nose ring, __Yes __No
pierced tongue, pierced cheek or a belly button ring?
(IF YOU ANSWERED 'YES' TO ANY OF THE ABOVE, DISCONTINUE APPLICATION
AND LEAVE PREMISES IMMEDIATELY. I SUGGEST RUNNING.)
ESSAY SECTION:
In 50 words or less, what does 'LATE' mean to you?
________________________________________ ______________________
In 50 words or less, what does 'DON'T TOUCH MY DAUGHTER' mean to you?
________________________________________ ______________________

In 50 words or less, what does 'ABSTINENCE' mean to you?
________________________________________ ______________________

REFERENCES SECTION:
Church you attend ________________________________________ ___________
How often you attend ________________________________________ ________
When would be the best time to interview your:
father? _____________
mother? _____________
pastor? _____________

SHORT-ANSWER SECTION:
Answer by filling in the blank. Please answer freely, all answers
are confidential.
A: If I were shot, the last place I would want to be shot would be: ________________________________________ ______________________
B: If I were beaten, the last bone I would want broken is my:
________________________________________ ______________________
C: A woman's place is in the:
________________________________________ ______________________
D: The one thing I hope this application does not ask me about is:
________________________________________ ______________________
E. What do you want to do IF you grow up? ________________________________________ ______________________
F. When I meet a girl, the thing I always notice about her first is:
________________________________________ ______________________
F. What is the current going rate of a hotel room? __________________
I SWEAR THAT ALL INFORMATION SUPPLIED ABOVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE UNDER PENALTY OF DEATH, DISMEMBERMENT,
NATIVE AMERICAN ANT TORTURE, CRUCIFIXION, ELECTROCUTION, CHINESE
WATER TORTURE, RED HOT POKERS, AND HILLARY CLINTON KISS TORTURE.

________________________________________ _________________
Applicant's Signature (that means sign your name, moron!)

_______________________________ ________________________________
Mother's Signature Father's Signature
_______________________________ ________________________________
Pastor/Priest/Rabbi State Representative/Congressman
Thank you for your interest, and it had better be genuine and non-sexual.
Please allow four to six years for processing

415 sparrowlake  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:28:07pm

re: #395 Ford_Prefect

I found myself in church one Sunday while the congregation read the Apostolic creed, and I just noticed how many people seemed to be saying the words without paying any attention to what they were saying. I realized that I was doing the same thing. So I spent the rest of the mass reading it over and over and finally decided that I just didn't believe it. It wasn't so much that I believed it was all untrue; I just didn't feel that faith that it was true. And twenty some odd years later I still don't.

In my own religious Jewish phase I believed that saying the words without paying attention to what one was saying was actually a legitimate form of prayer, sort of like repeating a mantra or inducing a trance-like state. The actual words were not as important on a conscious level as the state of mind they engendered.
That is what I believed at the time.

416 Salamantis  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:31:15pm

re: #267 Gordon Marock

As I have said before, I think one reason that ID people cannot tolerate a real discussion of their 'theory' is a basic fear of eternal oblivion after they die. Heck, it scares me too. However, rather than comfort myself by ceasing all intellectual questioning, I comfort myself by the fact that I made it through the eternity of oblivion that preceded my birth. So what the heck, I can do it again!

I must've made it through all that, but I can't remember...maybe I was just too young...;~)

417 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:32:59pm

re: #412 jcm

Cool!

Working on the next gen of this guy. Click overview tab.

Neat! And I see what you mean about everything but the kitchen sink.

418 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:33:47pm

I've GOT to get outta here.

jcm, goddess, GOOOOD night

419 beachkatie  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:34:46pm

Man i feel off a step latter today.... was coming off a buffet table in dinning room . I was putting Spackle in cracks over molding.. Don't wear reading glasses while working above your head!It will give you stars and knot on head! :)

420 melinwy  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:41:26pm

re: #233 Ojoe

OK, I will tell you a joke.

Some Scientists became very savvy and they created life in their laboratory.

"Well," they said to each other, "Guess we don't need God anymore, let's go see Him and tell Him."

So they went to see God.

"What do you have to tell me?" said God.

"God," said the scientists, "we've understood evolution so well that we've created life in the laboratory, and you aren't needed anymore, you can go now."

"Well," said God, "Why don't you show me how you do this."

"Ok," said the scientists, "First you take some dirt", and they reached down to the ground for some dirt,

"Wait!" said God, "Make your own dirt!"

...........................

And there you have it.

Evolution comes from God.

And Faith, well that is looked for best in the spiritual realms; If you look for faith directly on the physical plane, you will just spin around and around, because the physical is just a reflection of the spiritual.

Hope this makes some sense to you.


wonderful post! thanks

421 beachkatie  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:42:42pm

Weetdreams lizards ,!and have great safe day tomorrow ! :)

422 Throbert McGee  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:43:24pm

re: #408 pre-Boomer Marine brat

They made a "Lil' Abner" movie.

''The Country's in the Very Best of Hands'' -- from the 1959 Li'l Abner movie, but with timeless lyrics:

The Treasury says our national debt
Is climbin' to the sky!
And government expenditures
Have never been so high!
It makes a feller get a
Gleam of pride within his eye
To see how our economy expands --
The country's in the very best of hands!

And here's a scene from the movie featuring the cartoonishly muscular title character and the cartoonishly curvy Daisy Mae.

(The best number from the musical is "Jubilation T. Cornpone," but I couldn't find the movie version on YouTube -- though for masochists, there are plenty of high-school productions shot on camcorder with terrible sound quality.)

423 Throbert McGee  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:44:46pm

re: #421 beachkatie

Weetdreams lizards

I'm pretty sure this is a typo, but I'm afraid to ask what she actually meant to say...

424 Mars Needs Neocons  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:46:13pm

re: #423 Throbert McGee

I'm pretty sure this is a typo, but I'm afraid to ask what she actually meant to say...

Nope that's a pretty standard sendoff around here

425 Salamantis  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:46:51pm

Oh well; so much for George Slivers' drive-by sliming...

426 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 7:55:50pm

re: #423 Throbert McGee

It started as a typo for "Sweet Dreams" and has now taken on a life of it's own.

427 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 8:02:36pm

re: #399 goddessoftheclassroom

Sometimes when I say the credo the tears come.

428 LudwigVanQuixote  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 8:03:04pm

re: #68 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Thank you kindly.

429 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 8:04:13pm

re: #428 LudwigVanQuixote

No- thank you for a great post, and I hope you don't mind I reposted it here. I though George Silvers needed to read it.

430 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 8:05:17pm

Gosh, I'm sorry I missed ol' George Slivers' appearance!

re: #426 Sharmuta

It started as a typo for "Sweet Dreams" and has now taken on a life of it's own.

The one I thought would definitely take on a life of its own, but hasn't, was Mandy's "screen shit".

431 Sharmuta  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 8:14:56pm

re: #430 reine.de.tout

That's probably my favorite typo ever.

432 beachkatie  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 8:15:01pm

re: #254 Walter L. Newton

Seek and you shall find WalterL. Newton

433 Ojoe  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 8:51:19pm

America centre of equal daughters, equal sons,
All, all alike endeared, grown, ungrown, young or old,
Strong, ample, fair, enduring, capable, rich
Perennial with the Earth, with Freedom, Law and Love

—Walt Whitman


Good Night All

434 JeremyR  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 9:08:44pm

re: #312 boofar

I know what I am. A lesbian in a man's body.

:D

/i know i know
/i'll go to bed now
/long day tomorrow >_>

Just be careful, some day you may just meet a lesbian with a sharp knife who is more then able to help you escape.

435 Kulhwch  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 9:12:50pm

re: #37 Charles

Well, you know, for those complaining that I'm not focusing like a laser on Islamic terrorism, you might consider this a "tie-in."

A real two-fer, as it were ...

}:)     [It's a floor wax!  It's a desert topping!]

436 Throbert McGee  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 9:28:34pm

re: #426 Sharmuta

It started as a typo for "Sweet Dreams"

Figured so, but it made me think of this. (PG-13, but probably SFW unless your boss is a Baptist or something.)

As long as I'm looking around in my Photobucket collection, a few other items from the "slightly off-color" folder (again, they're work-safe, but probably PG-13, at least):

VCR cover art from Gayracula, an actual '80s pr0n movie (I'm pretty sure the original tagline was "he'll suck more than your blood," but here it's "he'll suck you dry")

Tentacle-themed Valentine's Day card stolen from cracked.com

• Either a homosexual merit badge, or the logo for some obscure brand of rooster-flavored candy

''Turning Rats Gay'' -- an actual Yahoo! news graphic

437 Throbert McGee  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 10:08:45pm

re: #415 sparrowlake

In my own religious Jewish phase I believed that saying the words without paying attention to what one was saying was actually a legitimate form of prayer, sort of like repeating a mantra or inducing a trance-like state.

That's part of the reason for "shuckling" while you pray, isn't it? To help induce the trance state?

Some lizards might be interested in a book called Why God Won't Go Away: Brain Science and the Biology of Belief. It discusses how researchers have performed CAT scans on the brains of subjects who regularly practiced deep, meditative prayer, such as Buddhist monks and some orders of Catholic nuns. Despite the obvious theological differences between Buddhism and Christianity, the scans supposedly revealed similar patterns of brain activity, suggesting that subjective spiritual experiences -- such as the feeling of having "an epiphany" -- are associated with underlying neurological events.

Which is to say that when people feel "touched by the Holy Spirit" during prayer, there may well be something truly out-of-the-ordinary going on in their physical brain. (And please note that "out of the ordinary" does not necessarily mean either "miraculous" or "abnormal" -- it just means "noticeably different from the brain's usual day-to-day functioning.")

But here's the cool part, I think: an atheist could argue, based on the above, that spiritual experiences are simply illusions that occur when abnormal conditions (such as recreational drugs, or extreme physical exhaustion, or prolonged meditation, or some combination of these factors) make our brains shift into this Special Operating Mode.

However, a person who believes in God could argue that He designed our brains to have this Special Operating Mode, to facilitate communication with Him. But also by His design, the default setting is "off," so that normally we must take deliberate measures to reach this altered brain state.

438 Fierce Guppy  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 10:19:04pm

Or, the grand cosmic leprechaun did it.

439 Kulhwch  Tue, Jul 22, 2008 11:37:57pm

re: #314 Walter L. Newton

I would give my left arm to be ambidextrous.

}:)     [I've got an old boomerang that I've tried to throw away a hundred times.]

440 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:12:09am

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Evolution is a 2001 documentary series by the American broadcaster PBS and WGBH on evolutionary biology.

The spokespeople for the series were Jane Goodall (overall spokesperson), Kenneth R. Miller and Stephen Jay Gould (science spokespeople), Eugenie C. Scott (education spokesperson), Arthur Peacocke and Arnold Thomas (religious spokespeople). The series was narrated by the Irish actor Liam Neeson.

The series was accompanied by a book by the popular science writer Carl Zimmer Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea. An extensive website provides teaching resources for each episode's material, including "The Mating Game", further looks at Charles Darwin, and an interactive history of speciation in the invented "pollencreeper" birds.

The episode What about God? features discussion of the issues of evolution and creationism at Wheaton College (Illinois), an Evangelical Protestant college that teaches evolution but has in the past restricted professors from taking a stance on the literal versus the allegorical interpretations of Adam and Eve in the Genesis account of creation.

TV critic Julie Salamon, writing in the New York Times, said that the series had "[a] powerful sense of drama, discovery and intellectual enthusiasm runs through this rich eight-hour series ... The series covers an enormous amount of ground but doesn’t leave you feeling swamped.".

Being made and broadcast in the country where creation-evolution controversy is strongest, the last episode What About God? focused on religion, and "through personal stories of students and teachers, it offers the view that they are compatible". Phina Borgeson, Faith Network Director of the National Center for Science Education provided Congregational Study Guide for Evolution.

Creationists, however, were less than impressed. Answers in Genesis called it a "barrage of evolutionary indoctrination" The Discovery Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture produced an entire website and started their A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism petition to show that there were "scientists that dispute the claims".

Episodes
1) Darwin's Dangerous Idea (two hours)
2) Great Transformations (one hour)
3) Extinction! (one hour)
4) The Evolutionary Arms Race (one hour)
5) Why Sex? (one hour)
6) The Mind's Big Bang (one hour)
7) What About God? (one hour)

Sal: To see this series go here and access the episodes:

[Link: video.google.com...]

There are 2 vids for Part 1 and 1 vid each for the Parts 2-7. Each episode is 50+ minutes long.

I really enjoyed it.

441 Jimmah  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 2:32:58am

There was a 2-hour documentary on channel 4 this week called 'The Quran". According to it, the real central message of the Quran is "go, seek, discover, understand". What apologetic rubbish. And, as with all apologia disguised as objective Islam analysis, there is a 'thoroughgoing' (ie biased) treatment of the issue of the Quran's treatment of the 'people of the book', but no mention whatsoever of it's treatment of unbelievers and polytheists, which is of course the real central message.

442 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 2:36:34am

re: #440 Salamantis

5) Why Sex? (one hour)

Why just one hour? ;)

443 wanumba  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 2:53:56am

Gee, didn't know that Salamantis had a charming side. This all we get to see...
#274 Salamantis

re: #271 wanumba
You all do realize that we do this sort of thing just so everyone who reads this gets to see how well you handle a debate. Snarling and cursing goes over very well with the general readership and gives the impression to the casual peruser that Charles has allowed grotesque bigotry to find a niche. So, frankly we haven't a care in the world whether you want to act all offended and pretend that we demanded you do something dopey like scourge yourself or not.
We just pointed out that you don't believe you have to apologize to us at all, because you don't respect us, so you won't. So, don't claim any moral high ground on ANYTHING if you practice discrimination.

You would have to rise inestimible in my opinion to merit or deserve my contempt, and the only thing people have to do to see why is to reference posts# 241, 266 and 267 on this thread, where I prove beyond a shadow of a rational doubt that you are a fucking liar, because you fucking lied about me. Decent and ethical people care far less about cursing than they do about lying; by that standard, you are above a murderer, a rapist, a torturer and a thief, but not above much else.

Socrates. Uh, B.C. means something. We were all laughing about this today, absolutely hilarious. Christians persecuted Socrates, but we're supposed to think you're not biased

?
Once again you fucking lie, you fucking liar. All people have to do to see what a fucking liar you are is to reference posts #241, 266 and 267 where I conclusively prove what a fucking liar you are, you fucking liar. People can check them out for themselves and clearly see that I am referring to a mindset rather than a religion; a coercive, totalitarian mindset that has been found in all religions, and that is found today in the attempts of the Disco Institute shills to force-feed their sectarian religious dogmas into the minds of other peoples' children in public high school science classes. I cannot believe that you are actually too dense, obtuse, moronic and imbecilic for this incontrovertible fact to penetrate your neanderthaline brow ridges and make its weary way into your slow and atrophied brain. If you are indeed that thick and dim, then I hazard to say that you are alone among readers of this site in being so utterly bereft of cognitive prerequisites. However, I think you are just playing dumb, when you are actually malignant.

And Godwin's Law. Invoking NAZIs in a debate indicates a weak position. Also, not showing from WHERE quotes of Christians=NAZIs comes from so that all readers can make a determination as to how non-partisan an article source is. Plenty of athetist-promoting and pagan-promoting sites provide very slanted histories to denigrate Christians, using the Third Reich. And we ALWAYS use the word Pagan in the classical sense, never lightly or frivolously

.

It is not a violation of Godwin's Law to invoke Nazis when one is not speaking analogically or metaphorically because genuine historical Third Reich Nazis were actually involved. As they indeed were in this case. And I have furnished the reference website URL before, and I furnish it again in the next post, as well as furnish access to the site's bona fides. Unlike you, I solidly support my contentions, rather than transparently and provably lying about people like you lied about me, you fucking liar.

BTW: Did I mention that you're a fucking liar?

Continued next post...


BTW, did I mention I reported your posts? You really respected CHarles's admonition to tone down the language, didn't you? Seems you don't respect HIM or the responsibility he carries for this blog, either.

444 Jimmah  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 2:55:30am

re: #267 Gordon Marock

As I have said before, I think one reason that ID people cannot tolerate a real discussion of their 'theory' is a basic fear of eternal oblivion after they die. Heck, it scares me too. However, rather than comfort myself by ceasing all intellectual questioning, I comfort myself by the fact that I made it through the eternity of oblivion that preceded my birth. So what the heck, I can do it again!

Yes - unless there is some kind of magical 'one soul, one life' rule. But 'soul' is a religious concept and has no place in a naturalistic account.

445 Jimmah  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 3:01:53am

re: #443 wanumba


Once again you fucking lie, you fucking liar. All people have to do to see what a fucking liar you are is to reference posts #241, 266 and 267

Posting on the wrong thread - that's just one of the problems associated with going online in a state of foaming apoplectic rage.

446 ebed_melech  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 3:44:05am

Fundamentalist Young Earth Creationists bankroll anti-Islamist group!

(actually, only one, once only and that for about $100 a year or so ago).

It's all too easy to smear by association, Charles.

O dear, my previous comments about thread devolution really seem to be in play today!

447 ebed_melech  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 3:52:13am

re: #392 Salamantis


Problem with your position Salamantis is the number of hard nosed empiricists who have been fierce and sometimes (but not always) vocal critics of Darwin and his sucessors - Faraday, Kelvin, Damadian, Ambrose Fleming (inventor the valve). Their creationism and theism informed and undergirded their whole attitude to science. As Solomon put it -'it is the glory of God to conceal a matter, it is the glory of kings to search it out'. Science for them and for us now is a game of divine hide and seek - with rules. Deists like Newton and perhaps Einstein too respected that - but for antitheists the rules are actually illusory, why are they more than sense perceptions, and may prove to be wholly false.

If you think theists must do away with science to be consistent, then perhaps to be consistent you should deny yourself the benefit of their brain children- but then we won't hear from you again!

448 capn_jon[deleted]  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 4:44:22am
449 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:02:35am

The fucking lying wanumba copies and pastes post my post #274 here, when the references are to the Darwin's Surprise thread:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

and particularly to these three posts on it:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

If you go to the numbers #241, #266 and #267 on this thread, you will see nothing, but if you go to the links that I just posted above, the ones to which the post originally refers, you will see absolute, utter and incontrovertible proof that this sick and twisted excuse for a homo sapiens IS INDEED lying about what I said, and furthermore, he is doing so in order to slander me, so he can persuade people to not pay attention to what I have to say, regardless of its merit. It is precisely the type of devious little mendacity games that the Disco Institute shills play with the educational and scientific community worldwide when they cannot prevail on the merits.

And I wager that any single one of you would be just as pissed off as I am to be so brazenly and repeatedly lied about by such a pitiful and pathetic excuse for a person as he, even after the lie is directly exposed. But having regally and royally pissed me off by publicly lying about me, he now possesses the temerity and utter GALL to try to get me censured for getting pissed off big-time at his repeated lying about me, while he plans to skate away from any censure for the serial lying about me that prompted my justified and understandable outrage in the first place.

I also note that he did not post a link to the rest of that missive (the part after To Be Continued...), which appears in the next post. Well, here it is:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Go ahead and read them all, and find out for yourselves what an execrable lying sack of rancid fistula pus this Christian Soldier is. He embarrasses and shames his co-religionists by claiming their faith, and abundantly demonstrates that he personally lacks the ethics that he pretends to preach.

I have my own request to make of Charles: that he compel wanumba to issue a public apology for repeatedly lying about me on this list.

450 Annar  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:04:14am

re: #448 capn_jon

Can someone pass a note to Charles?

I believe in the scientific accuracy of Darwinism, and I don't think Intelligent Design is science--it's religion pretending to be science. So I agree with the official LGF stance on the whole thing.

NOW, can we stop waging this stupid jihad against creationists on LGF?

Please?

If someone wants to believe the Earth is 6,000 years old, I don't really care. If someone wants to believe the Earth is flat, I don't really care. I don't even care if someone thinks these silly beliefs belong in public schools--it's not as if one more dumb idea will sink our already sunk public education system. As always, good parents can easily deprogram little Johnny when he gets home from school. And if little Johnny's parents are no good, then little Johnny will get deprogrammed in college. And if little Johnny can't make it into college, it isn't as if his silly idea about the age of Earth kept him out.

Can we return the focus of this site back to winning the war against fundamentalist islam? That's why I love coming here. And please, for Darwin's sake, can we stop trying to connect islamists to creationists? That's like comparing islamists to all supporters of capital punishment.

We're smarter than this.

There are both Islamists and Christians who would like to wedge a part of their superstitious beliefs into the public school system by the introduction of Intelligent Design creationism. The pressure must continue to insure that those who pass through the public school system will have some exposure to real science and have the comic book ramblings of the fellow travelers Hovind and Behe relegated to their appropriate places in comparative religion classes or the church.

The war against fundamentalist Islam is a distinct issue regardless of the fact that they too support creationism.

451 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:21:58am

re: #447 ebed_melech

Problem with your position Salamantis is the number of hard nosed empiricists who have been fierce and sometimes (but not always) vocal critics of Darwin and his sucessors - Faraday, Kelvin, Damadian, Ambrose Fleming (inventor the valve). Their creationism and theism informed and undergirded their whole attitude to science.

You post scentists from centuries ago, and ones that did not work in the biological sciences. So their qualifications to criticize evolutionary theory are what exactly?

As Solomon put it -'it is the glory of God to conceal a matter, it is the glory of kings to search it out'. Science for them and for us now is a game of divine hide and seek - with rules. Deists like Newton and perhaps Einstein too respected that - but for antitheists the rules are actually illusory, why are they more than sense perceptions, and may prove to be wholly false.

The rules for empirical science are the same across the board, and, following those rules, evolutionary theory is, and has been for a century and a half, the most amply supported theory in the empirical sciences. The methods of investigation are far more tenuous in physics (traces of light in cloud chambers vs. genes that can be spliced in and out repeatedly so their purpose manifests in the organisms in which they are spliced and the organisms from which they are removed). But that is the field of Einstein (who got quantum mechanics wrong) and his successors (who corrected that error). Darwin's evolutionary theory, on the other hand, has been added to by Mendel and by Watson & Crick, but has yet to be shown to be in error.

If you think theists must do away with science to be consistent, then perhaps to be consistent you should deny yourself the benefit of their brain children- but then we won't hear from you again!

I do not see their Disco Institute brain children doing much in the biological sciences over the past decades, except to have the publication of their scientific laughingstock propaganda tomes bankrolled by anti-science agenda-driven monied people, and to try to sneak articles that they peer-review for each other into respectable publications, as their Wedge Strategy instructs. On the other hand, there are really good scientists in the biological field among the theists, such as Francis Collins, the fellow who created the technique by means of which we decoded the human genome and great ape genomes (these decodings allowed science to find out about the thousands of identical artifactual DNA sequences in human and great ape genomes, found in identical spots in ours and theirs, that prove beyond a rational doubt that we share common ancestors with them), and by means of which we are now busy decoding the genomes of other life forms.

He is an unabashed Christian. He is also an unabashed accepter of the theory of evolution. And the genesis literalists embarrass him.

452 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:22:59am

PS: They embarrass him both as a scientist and as a Christian.

453 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:36:09am

re: #445 Jimmah

re: #443 wanumba

Once again you fucking lie, you fucking liar. All people have to do to see what a fucking liar you are is to reference posts #241, 266 and 267

Jimmah: Posting on the wrong thread - that's just one of the problems associated with going online in a state of foaming apoplectic rage.

No, Jimmah, I didn't post that here (although I DID post it on the Darwin's Surprise thread); that deliquesced carbuncle wanumba did. It's one of his last desperate attempts to try to manage to use his exposed lies to get me, the serially lied about, in trouble, by complaining about my justified outrage in being lied about by him, while he hopes to escape all censure for telling those lies of his about me in the first place.

Just scroll up to post # 449 on this thread if you want to find out all about this matter; included in that post are all the further links you will need in order to conclusively verify what a fucking malignant, malevolent and manipulating liar wanumba in fact is.

454 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:50:15am

re: #448 capn_jon

Can someone pass a note to Charles?

I believe in the scientific accuracy of Darwinism, and I don't think Intelligent Design is science--it's religion pretending to be science. So I agree with the official LGF stance on the whole thing.

NOW, can we stop waging this stupid jihad against creationists on LGF?

Please?

If someone wants to believe the Earth is 6,000 years old, I don't really care. If someone wants to believe the Earth is flat, I don't really care. I don't even care if someone thinks these silly beliefs belong in public schools--it's not as if one more dumb idea will sink our already sunk public education system. As always, good parents can easily deprogram little Johnny when he gets home from school. And if little Johnny's parents are no good, then little Johnny will get deprogrammed in college. And if little Johnny can't make it into college, it isn't as if his silly idea about the age of Earth kept him out.

Can we return the focus of this site back to winning the war against fundamentalist islam? That's why I love coming here. And please, for Darwin's sake, can we stop trying to connect islamists to creationists? That's like comparing islamists to all supporters of capital punishment.

We're smarter than this.

Charles has been smart enough to uncover the connections between the Disco Institute people and Harun Yahya, and kind enough to point them out to us. You should be thanking him, instead of telling him what to and not to do with his blog.

And no, I do not think that most parents wanna cede the programming of their children to sectarian theocrats and their dogma, nor do I think most US citizens wanna shitcan the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.

It's the Disco Institute creationists who are waging jihad, and they are waging it on the public educational system of this country, and against the rights of public school parents to religiously instruct their own children. Charles is just pointing that fact out, and also pointing out why it is so important that we, as citizens of this great nation, not allow these totalitarian crusaders to succeed.

455 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 6:00:36am

BTW: If anyone wants to know about my cursing at that fucking liar wanumba, I did so quite intentionally. But why? Why would I do such a thing?

Because I WANT to bring list attention to what that disgusting, nauseating, repellent, repulsive scumsack has done. And to let you know that if he'll lie about me, he'll lie about any of you, whenever he perceives that it serves his manipulative, button-pushing, response-provoking purposes to do so. That's just the way internet sociopaths operate.

456 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 6:11:27am

When these folks realises that they are irretriveably losing the debate on its merits, many of them, including wanumba, will eagerly resort to ad hominems, and they couldn't care less whether the ad hominems are legitimate or not. They'll make false accusations and tell malicious lies about you in a New York heartbeat if they think they can get anything whatsoever out of it, even if all they're hoping for is to divert other peoples' attention from the realization that the facts are undeniably against them.

457 ben-ami  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 6:14:09am

re: #228 CIA Reject

G*d invented random!

While on vacation a couple of weeks ago I saw a great bumpersticker: "In the beginning, God created evolution."

458 foldedspace  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 6:45:14am

I'm a bit confused why there seems to be a post about Evolution and/or Intelligent Design just about every day. It can be misconstrued that Charles is trying to make a link between Christian belief and terrorists. I doubt that's what he's trying to do, but it can be taken in that light. It's a tenuous connection at best and seems a bit slanderous to a majority of Christians in America that believe in some form of ID. You could also make the same "logical" connection that since Allah and God are somewhat similar, there is a dangerous commonality between your average Christian and Muslim extremists....

I don't know how much more wisdom can be mined from this vein.

The problem isn't so much an ID agenda in the public schools, it's that there is a monopoly on education. If you think ID curriculum is frightening, you should see the left-wing indoctrination that's taking place *right now*. This seems a bit more personal rather than intellectual. If bad lesson plans are what gets your ire up, then there are a lot of things being taught right now that should get you posting.

459 darcy  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 6:46:38am

What has happened at LGF. It looks like athiest-central here. How sad.

460 ludwigvanquixote  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 6:55:44am

re: #429 Sharmuta

I am very pleased you liked it. Thank you very much for saying so.

461 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 7:03:40am

re: #459 darcy

What has happened at LGF. It looks like athiest-central here. How sad.

Naah; it still looks like anti-idiotarian central. My guess is that you are a genesis-type young-earth, no-common-ancestors-between-great-apes-and-humans creationist, who might well want the Disco Institute to be able to peddle their sectarian religious dogma in public high school science class, and now it's your sacred ox getting gored. Or you could have just read the Wedge Document, that instructs ID-sympathetic people to try to illegitimately change the debate from presence of empirical evidence vs. absence of empirical evidence, or from science in public high school science class vs, religion in public high school science class, to Good Ol' God vs. Bad Ol' Atheists.

462 darcy  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 7:12:24am

Salamantis, if you are typical of what dwells here at LGF these days, then Charles better wake up and start reading his friggin blog. Oy!

#458 - YOU ARE SOOOOO RIGHT!

463 Yashmak  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 7:15:18am

#459 What has happened at LGF. It looks like athiest-central here. How sad.

Drawing equivalencies? Resistance to teaching religion in public schools makes one an atheist?

Many of those here arguing against teaching creationism under the cloak of "I.D." here are in fact practicing Christians that are rational enough to understand the importance of the establishment clause.

464 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 7:16:14am

re: #458 foldedspace

I'm a bit confused why there seems to be a post about Evolution and/or Intelligent Design just about every day. It can be misconstrued that Charles is trying to make a link between Christian belief and terrorists. I doubt that's what he's trying to do, but it can be taken in that light. It's a tenuous connection at best and seems a bit slanderous to a majority of Christians in America that believe in some form of ID. You could also make the same "logical" connection that since Allah and God are somewhat similar, there is a dangerous commonality between your average Christian and Muslim extremists....

I don't know how much more wisdom can be mined from this vein.

I imagine that Charles will be able to find quite a bit more, if he so desires. I have certainly seen plenty around that I think would add to the discussion but that hasn't been posted yet...

There are thirty-four separate threads on the front page; only five of those have to do with evolution/creationism, and one of those five is both connected with Islamist terrorism and connects with a previous post about the same terrorist solicitor. The links are actually there. Charles doesn't need to make anything up; if the already existing links are pointed out, anyone can see them.

The problem isn't so much an ID agenda in the public schools, it's that there is a monopoly on education. If you think ID curriculum is frightening, you should see the left-wing indoctrination that's taking place *right now*. This seems a bit more personal rather than intellectual. If bad lesson plans are what gets your ire up, then there are a lot of things being taught right now that should get you posting.

The debate is about keeping sectarian religious dogma out of public high school science class. Now, there may be other indoctrination problems with our public educational system, but you don't cure arsenic poisoning by dosing the patient with strychnine.

465 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 7:17:15am

re: #462 darcy

Salamantis, if you are typical of what dwells here at LGF these days, then Charles better wake up and start reading his friggin blog. Oy!

#458 - YOU ARE SOOOOO RIGHT!

I could say the same about you; in fact, I just did.

466 quickjustice  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 7:20:16am

It's a further measure of the extremely poor judgment of creationists and ID proponents that they have allied themselves with Muslim fanatics.

I'm a New Yorker. I was in New York on September 11, 2001. Muslim fanatics murdered thousands in a suicide attack using hijacked aircraft. They also attacked our Pentagon, killing our servicemen. They had ambitions to take out the U.S. Capitol using United Flight 93. But for those heroic passengers, an important symbol of American democracy would have been seriously damaged or destroyed.

What creationists and ID proponents seem not to understand is that they, or their "leaders", now have allied themselves with these Muslim fanatics and murderers. Maybe they're merely useful idiots who do not understand the gravity of what they've done. Or maybe they fully understand the implications of allying themselves with the ideological heirs of the murderers who attacked our country.

Charles has been trying to spell it out. Let me help: they've allied themselves with EVIL in the name of G-d. That's blasphemous, it's the "unforgivable sin" referred to in Scripture, and it imperils your souls. Stop it now, or suffer the consequences.

467 Ojoe  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 7:27:59am

re: #459 darcy

Go see all my posts this thread, and other posts this thread, it is not atheist central by any means.

468 Josephine  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 8:15:40am

re: #455 Salamantis

Sal,

I'm not trying to get in between you and wanumba here.

But the name-calling in your comments is too hostile for me. It's too ugly. It's the reason why I decided to put FinnAgain on GAZE and, to me, you sound like him when he blasted Render again and again and again. It's overkill.

I don't think wanumba deserves such abusive language on a repeated basis. Furthermore, I don't like reading it. I enjoy many of your comments but I might have to start scrolling past them.

I am not a monitor. I have no authority here. I'm asking, as a fellow lizard, if you would please take the high road here and argue your points without getting so personal.

I'm not familiar with wanumba but it sounds like he (she?) has done some very important work in a dangerous part of the world and I respect that. In the comments I have read, he has been respectful and polite (whether I agree with his points or not).

469 Sharmuta  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 8:25:20am

re: #460 ludwigvanquixote

I sincerely hope we see you again on another one of these threads and you add some more wonderful insight.

470 evilrightwingnut  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 9:41:31am

It seems to me the problem here is that a lot of people who frequent LGF believe in "creationism" in some form or another. And like me, when they see these threads here like this one, draw the conclusion that "I" as someone who believes in a creator am now being lumped in with Islamic Extremist terrorists.

Whether that's the point of this particular story or not, that's the conclusions being drawn, at least with this particular ID/Evolution post. And then when anyone of these people posts something there are no less that 50 people with responses like "go piss up a rope" or "you're an idiot". Or in some cases just have their posts deleted all together when they didn't even say anything bad or derogatory, just because they didn't agree(GASP) with Charles.

So instead of an intelligent and friendly discussion about this particular subject it just boils down to a flame fest and labeling any dissenters as trolls. I and many people like me who came to LGF in the first place because we are conservatives and enjoyed seeing all of the stories that Charles posts up calling out the idiot liberals and terrorists. Then when there are posts like this which insult our creation beliefs by lumping us in with terrorists and/or calling us backwards 1750's thinking morons.... well whatever... Just thought we as "conservatives" wouldn't stoop to eating our own like the filthy liberals do. Guess I was wrong.

Oh and I'm sure because I haven't been registered here for 28 years and have 394756892034 posts that makes anything I say invalid, correct?

471 Jim D  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 9:58:22am

re: #459 darcy

What has happened at LGF. It looks like athiest-central here. How sad.

What? You assumed it was 'good and Christian' up to the point Charles started posting on ID? This is an anti-Idiotarian blog. The atheists, pagans, etc. have always been here. We care about this country and our freedoms as much as anyone else.

re: #462 darcy

Salamantis, if you are typical of what dwells here at LGF these days, then Charles better wake up and start reading his friggin blog. Oy!

Yeah, it's a shame to see people like Salamantis taking an active role in the debate. All of those well reasoned arguments and helpful links are are just polluting this place.

It's folks like you with your snide remarks that should be posting here. That will class up the joint and elevate the discussion.

472 quickjustice  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 10:06:22am

re: #470 evilrightwingnut

The "problem" here is NOT a "belief" in creationism, in G-d, in Jesus, or even in Moses. If you say, "I believe G-d created everything", that's your privilege. You are NOT privileged to declare that G-d's creation precludes others from pursuing physical science, natural science, or use of the scientific method.

You also are not privileged to politicize our government and our schools to drive out good science with bad science. That's as bad as claiming that science proves atheism.

473 quickjustice  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 10:10:33am

re: #470 evilrightwingnut

I should add that if creationists are foolish enough to ally themselves with Muslim fanatics, they're gonna get tarred with the same brush, and deservedly so. You have to be careful about whom you associate with.

474 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 10:52:07am

re: #470 evilrightwingnut

Then when there are posts like this which insult our creation beliefs by lumping us in with terrorists...

When major creationist groups are collaborating with Islamists in Turkey and elsewhere to promote their views, it's not ME who is "lumping" creationism in with terrorists.

It's a fact. Deal with it, instead of insulting the messenger.

475 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 11:03:13am

re: #470 evilrightwingnut

Or in some cases just have their posts deleted all together when they didn't even say anything bad or derogatory, just because they didn't agree(GASP) with Charles.

Not a single post has been deleted because it didn't agree(GASP) with me. I have a clearly stated policy that I'm going to delete posts that tell me to stop writing about this subject.

476 wanumba  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 11:05:02am

Dear readers,
We objected this week when Charles wrote that anyone who did not agree with his stated beliefs in evolution "ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED."

We pointed out that he'd made a statement of theological faith by stating positions about God and evolution theory, which are his business, but when he added "anyone who says otherwise ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED," and posted that on a nationally read blog, then he was opening the door to pure bigotry.

We told Charles directly that by THAT statement, he was inadvertently sanctioning a dangerous denigration of Orthodox Jews, Evangelical Catholics and Evangelical Protestants.

Since then, posted on this blog are statements that 80% of NAZIs were Christians so Christians murdered the Jews. We objected.

Salamantis has spent most of his time arguing a strawman he's created, projecting on to us what he THINKS we are, based on blatently grotesque and hate-filled stereotypes that he holds. Go back and read, keeping in mind the original warning I made. LGF would be no better than KOS.
Level of decency? Nah. Dump the debate, make it personal, attack the individual. Except of course, it's not actually the inidvidual, but a projection of hate onto an entire group. Having been caught up in religious/ethnic cleansing in real life, we have a heightened sense of how it starts with people denigrated and stereotyped and then isolated, then assigned all sorts of dark motivations and "NOT TO BE TRUSTED." Thus, the original warning.

Charles commented to tone down the language being generated, and a poster apologized - to Charles, not to the poster he was purposely targetting with abuse, which proves how sincere the apology was - a CYA to keep posting rights - and opportunity to abuse with impunity. Several posters have come in to also express the views that it was unnecessarily ugly, and they received abuse for their impudence to urge restraint.

So now what? How can a long time poster like wanumba post on anything on this blog without being arbitraily labelled, and pushed aside as suspect? Not to be trusted on what? Science, religion, math, politics, schools, education, geography? Automatically sent to LOWER than third class status, sub-human, stamped "NEANDERTHAL?" Posters on this blog have already declared they'd change doctors if they found out one was a practicing CHristian. Despite honorable and productive servce, shunned because of a litmus test? How many would say, "If I found out I had a gay doctor, I'd change?" NOOO can't say that. It'd be closeminded and bigoted. Or If the doctor walked in and I saw he was Black, I'd change doctors." NOOO! How disgusting. That's bigotry!
But, with no other considerations, "I wouldn't trust a Christian doctor. I want modern medicine." Say what?!?

The Andrew Sullivan Effect. Obsess on a topic that has personal importance, which becomes a vehicle to promote anti-Christian bigotry. Blog attracts a new kind of poster, and turns away long time fans and supporters.

477 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 11:08:55am

re: #476 wanumba

Is there a point to any of this, or is the purpose simply to whine some more about how insulted you feel that I'm bringing up this topic?

478 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 11:12:11am

re: #476 wanumba

We objected this week when Charles wrote that anyone who did not agree with his stated beliefs in evolution "ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED."

We pointed out that he'd made a statement of theological faith by stating positions about God and evolution theory, which are his business, but when he added "anyone who says otherwise ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED," and posted that on a nationally read blog, then he was opening the door to pure bigotry.

Now you're lying about what I wrote.

These are the words I wrote:

Belief in God does not preclude belief in evolution.
Belief in evolution does not preclude belief in God.
Do not trust those who insist otherwise.

I stand by every word, and the fact that you need to lie and distort reinforces my point.

479 wanumba  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 11:26:46am

And the subway Imam is trying use links to sites that he thinks will make him seem harmless and appealing. Has the linked site commented on this association, been contacted about it? Aware this creep is trying to use them? Just yesterday, an aquaintance just us they'd discovered someone had just put their name on their website, claiming this person's on their board, which is false. Some other group just tried use this person's name for fund-raising without their permission and had to be ordered to cease. Given that this happens frequently enough on the internet, isn't this worth investigating a few more millimeters deeper? It's not like the Imam has shown himself to be an honorable character, respecting the law, life or anything.

Bible-believing Christians are fully aware of the twisting and rewriting of scripture that manifests itself in the Koran. They are fully aware that it's "convert or die." It's preposterous that they'd forget this, "Do not yoke yourselves to unbelievers."

Charles, have you contacted the Institute? You have a great credibility and a national exposure. Ask them if they know they've been linked, by whom and post for all of us what they say. Then we'll be better informed to decide what's going on.

480 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:00:00pm

re: #12 jcm

re: #8 george slivers

Islamic terrorists are bad people
Islamic terrorists tend to be creationists

Ergo! Creationists are bad people!

You kids are so brilliant.

Go piss up a rope.

Beautiful: Confronted with the cold, hard logic of this laughable approach, you resort to an ad hominem riposte.

481 wanumba  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:15:15pm

Charles, please define how far TRUST goes.

You have made a statement of your own belief. You are announcing to everyone that it's final via the statement no other beliefs are valid - "not to be trusted."

This is a correct summary.

We have not lied. We offered the caution in good faith, because this is a very very serious matter and we believed you honestly did not realize the moral significance of what was stated.

All we are getting is jump ugly in return. You think we liked all this? Pushing to expose the quality of characters like Salamantis? We get nothing out of this, except hysterical abuse. You can say get the hell out of here, but remember, we didn't pretend to be your friend and flatter you and then spin on a dime and think we own the blog and act like blog attack dogs to evicerate other posters. We gave you an honest alarm in good faith that this was heading the wrong way. Flattery is a form of hatred. People do it to get something they want from other people.

It would have been fair and correct and gracious to have just replied that ya don't see it and therefore don't agree. Fine. Didn't have to resort to the accusation of "lying."

482 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:20:06pm

re: #481 wanumba

Misrepresenting and misquoting someone's words is known as "lying." It's right there in your post. Compare what you quoted me as saying, with what I actually said.

How do you reconcile your professed Christian beliefs, and self-assumed authority to lecture others on theology, with misquoting and lying?

483 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:40:49pm

re: #479 wanumba

Charles, have you contacted the Institute? You have a great credibility and a national exposure. Ask them if they know they've been linked, by whom and post for all of us what they say. Then we'll be better informed to decide what's going on.

While I agree with you 100% and disagree with Charles' risible fascination with evolutionary thought, I have to say that ICR is their own worst enemy here.

I have in the past two weeks called their offices in both Dallas and San Diego (their museum), imploring them to post a statement countering what I believe to be the smears (of being in league with jihadists) being set forth on this Web site. My pleas apparently fell on deaf ears.

Granted, I did not get through to Dr. Morris, and the ones I talked to probably thought I was a babbling idiot, but, in my view, it is unwise in the extreme to let someone of Charles Johnson's worldwide reach continue to smear you unanswered.

484 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:41:56pm

re: #483 gunjam

While I agree with you 100% and disagree with Charles' risible fascination with evolutionary thought, I have to say that ICR is their own worst enemy here.

I have in the past two weeks called their offices in both Dallas and San Diego (their museum), imploring them to post a statement countering what I believe to be the smears (of being in league with jihadists) being set forth on this Web site. My pleas apparently fell on deaf ears.

Granted, I did not get through to Dr. Morris, and the ones I talked to probably thought I was a babbling idiot, but, in my view, it is unwise in the extreme to let someone of Charles Johnson's worldwide reach continue to smear you unanswered.

They can't post a statement countering it, because every word I've written is true.

485 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:44:11pm

re: #483 gunjam

...(of being in league with jihadists)...

This, by the way, is another lie. I never said any of these groups were "in league with jihadists."

What I said, and what is true, is that both the Discovery Institute and the Institute for Creation Research have collaborated with Turkish Islamic creationists. In the ICR's case, the collaboration is extensive, and includes the most radical groups run by Harun Yahya.

All factual.

486 Yashmak  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:45:45pm

#476 Wanumba

You're not even bothering to try and debate the issue anymore. Perhaps you've finally learned you have no leg to stand upon. So now, instead of gracefully bowing out, you have instead decided to try BLATANT PROPAGANDA, a silly melodramatic appeal that's wholly unconvincing.

You are deliberately twisting what Charles has said, and you know it.
You are trying to discredit the information Salamantis has provided, repeatedly and in great detail, simply because on some occasions in more recent arguments on this thread, he has finally become frustrated with the incessant repetition of the same ridiculous and thoroughly debunked claims you and others are making.

While I didn't trust some of your views before, due to your post #476, I no longer trust YOU.

487 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:50:15pm

re: #482 Charles

Charles, perhaps you haven't noticed that it is CHRISTIAN creationists who tend to enlist in the US armed forces for the fight against jihadism, whereas it is ISLAMIST creationists who tend to migrate to the ranks of al-Qaeda to fight on the opposite side. Does this mean nothing to you?

Just thought I would call that datum to your attention, as it puts a dent in one of the points you appears to be making, namely that Christian creationists are predisposed to be in league with the jihadis.

Nothing could be further from the truth: I wonder how many creationist Christians have been raped, killed, imprisoned, and/or sold into slavery by Islamist creationists?

Answer: A lot.

488 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:51:31pm

re: #487 gunjam

Hey, that's good. I point out that you're lying, and you ... repeat the lie.

489 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:52:33pm

re: #484 Charles

They can't post a statement countering it, because every word I've written is true.re: #486 Yashmak

he has finally become frustrated with the incessant repetition of the same ridiculous and thoroughly debunked claims you and others are making.

Okay: Got it.

Creationist frustration, BAD.
Evolutionist frustration, GOOD!

:-)

490 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:57:13pm

re: #488 Charles

Hey, that's good. I point out that you're lying, and you ... repeat the lie.

Let me back off: I do not want to lie. Nor do I wish to misrepresent you.

So, you are not saying creationists or even ICR are in league with the jihidis?

Then please accept my apologies: I do think you are an honest man, despite our disagreements (and my possible misunderstanding).

I have not intentionally lied, and i will retract anything i said that was incorrect. Moreover, I will apologize if I have done this.

491 quickjustice  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:57:49pm

re: #476 wanumba

I think Charles already adequately has addressed the lies and distortions in your post. When you try to play victim, however, you're totally off the reservation. You claim Creationists and Discovery Institute are innocent of affiliating with Muslim fanatics, and are being "set up" or manipulated? Prove it!

You say your heart is pure? Recognize this?: "There is none righteous, no, not one." As I understand Jesus of Nazareth, he taught humility, particularly in spiritual matters. He also taught a G-d of Love, caring for all of His children, including tax collectors and sinners. Jesus was Jewish. Whence, then, the centuries old Christian persecution of Jews? Could Jews who harbor rage and suspicion over this bloody history of the Christian Church have a point?

"Alas, alas for you, lawyers, and Pharisees, hypocrites!" Recognize that? Look carefully in the mirror every morning, especially if you claim to be religious. I know I do.

492 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 12:58:26pm

re: #490 gunjam

So, you are not saying creationists or even ICR are in league with the jihidis?

The facts are in my comment #485.

493 quickjustice  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:09:59pm

re: #483 gunjam

Your efforts show your good faith. I fear that these people will disappoint you. Let that be a lesson.

494 Josephine  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:15:27pm

re: #476 wanumba

We objected this week when Charles wrote that anyone who did not agree with his stated beliefs in evolution "ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED."

He wrote that anyone who says that you can't believe in God and accept the theory of evolution is not to be trusted.

We pointed out that he'd made a statement of theological faith by stating positions about God and evolution theory, which are his business, but when he added "anyone who says otherwise ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED," and posted that on a nationally read blog, then he was opening the door to pure bigotry.

We told Charles directly that by THAT statement, he was inadvertently sanctioning a dangerous denigration of Orthodox Jews, Evangelical Catholics and Evangelical Protestants.

This reminds me of the human rights tribunals in Canada which convict people of saying or writing things that might possibly offend or hurt someone's feelings at some point in time.

Charles has the right to disagree with the creationist doctrine of some religious denominations, including when the doctrine states that belief in creationism is necessary to salvation.

He has the right to say, Hey, if someone tells you that a true believer can't accept the theory of evolution, don't trust them on that.

Charles did not sanction "a dangerous denigration" of anyone. This is the second time (to my knowledge and in my opinion) that you've come close to accusing him of unwittingly promoting an ethnic cleansing against a group of people. You are wrong.

495 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:18:02pm
What I said, and what is true, is that both the Discovery Institute and the Institute for Creation Research have collaborated with Turkish Islamic creationists. In the ICR's case, the collaboration is extensive, and includes the most radical groups run by Harun Yahya.

Okay. And I have already said that I don't agree with what they have done here.

What ICR CAN answer is whether this collaboration is ongoing or has been terminated.

If the collaboration is all in the past tense, then I can accept it as something in the past. If the collaboration is ongoing, then, even though I am a confirmed creationist, I will be disappointed in their decision to continue such an association in a time of armed conflict with jihadist forces.

My beliefs will not be shattered in the slightest, but my moral support for ICR will be seriously diminished due to what I see as a lack of good judgment on their part in this regard.

496 quickjustice  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:20:24pm

re: #487 gunjam

Charles never has attacked your personal faith, or that of Christians in general. You therefore don't need to be defending Christianity to him or to us.

I've found that evil people sometimes camouflage themselves in religion. To the extent they collaborate with Muslim fanatics, these people may be no exceptions.

497 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:21:10pm

re: #492 Charles

Charles, I apologize for misconstruing your remarks.

498 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:27:07pm

re: #495 gunjam

In the CBC radio piece I posted about last week, on Islamic creationism in Turkey, the ICR is given a lot of credit for helping to influence Turkish schools to teach creationism in science classes. It also says the ICR have been involved with Turkish creationists for decades.

This is why I say their collaboration is "extensive." It was ongoing and very influential in Turkey.

499 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:29:06pm
jihadist:jihadis:jihadism

You keep using that word...

500 quickjustice  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 1:49:01pm

re: #499 Slumbering Behemoth

The name "Yisrael" refers to the Biblical account of Jacob's struggling with the angel of G-d, or with G-d Himself. It translates roughly from the Hebrew, "He struggles with G-d". It identifies the Jewish people as a nation, and is the source of the name "Israel".

The Arabic "Jihad" comes from the same root word, and refers to a Holy Struggle. There are many possible ways of interpreting this. Muslim fanatics take it literally to mean perpetrating violence against non-believers. That belief is the source of the 9/11 attacks upon innocent civilians. Muslim fanatics don't believe there's any such thing as "innocent" non-believers.

501 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 2:01:47pm

re: #499 Slumbering Behemoth

jihadist:jihadis:jihadism

You keep using that word...

Perhaps you are referring to me?

Yes. I use the word frequently: Unlike President Bush and the State Department folks, I am not in the least queasy about identifying the enemy and labeling him clearly.

502 gunjam  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 2:08:28pm

re: #498 Charles

In the CBC radio piece I posted about last week, on Islamic creationism in Turkey, the ICR is given a lot of credit for helping to influence Turkish schools to teach creationism in science classes. It also says the ICR have been involved with Turkish creationists for decades.

This is why I say their collaboration is "extensive." It was ongoing and very influential in Turkey.

Understood. I read that post and have done some Internet searching.

Personally, I am delighted to see creationism spread, but I am very leery of cooperating with jihadists in general, and particularly during a time of armed conflict with fighters of that persuasion.

While -- unlike you-- I find the ICR's positions on science and creationism fascinating and convincing, I would rather not see them continue this line of what you term "collaboration" with the BAV types -- at least not during this time of armed conflict.

To summarize my position:
Creationism: Good
Collaboration (even with the noblest of intentions) with those sympathetic to our enemies during a time of armed conflict: Not so much.

503 Josephine  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 2:26:26pm

re: #476 wanumba

The more I think about this, the more it bothers me.

I wouldn't want to think that any religion was exempt from criticism or "ridicule", even my own. If my religion can't stand up to questioning, perhaps I need to rethink what I believe.

We have to keep our rational minds, even within our religion. It is by thinking and analyzing rationally -- not by reacting emotionally -- that we conquer ignorance and hatred.

What if the true danger lies in convincing a large group of people that, in order to keep their faith and ensure their salvation, they must remain ignorant of the material world and deny proven scientific facts? What religious or political leader would want his flock to insist on remaining ignorant and cut off from a large segment of modern society?

Yes, yes, those imams are bad! Wait... some Christian pastors are doing it? Oh, you mustn't discuss that, you'll alienate your base and cause Christianophobia, which might lead to crimes against Christians: you wouldn't want to be responsible for that, would you?

God gave me a brain. Any religious group or doctrine that requires me to turn off my ability to think should not be trusted. (Those are my words.) Religious fanaticism cannot coexist with reality: one or the other has to win out. I'm a Christian who stands on the side of reality.

504 LetMeIn  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 3:08:34pm

Don't you just LUV double standards? Expelled: No Intelligence was attacked for linking Darwinism and Nazi Germany...BUT you have continually tried to link ID with Islamic terrorists and creationists to discredit it.

I think you should stick with what you do well, instead of being so laughably inconsistent, and in cases ignorant (willingly or not, I do not know). And, out of curiosity, are atheists now creationists (see link below)?

[Link: spot.colorado.edu...]

505 Charles  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 3:20:57pm

re: #504 LetMeIn

You can't deny the connections are there, so you just dump another silly creationist link. That's one way to handle it.

506 Yashmak  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 4:26:33pm
If my religion can't stand up to questioning, perhaps I need to rethink what I believe.

- josephine

That's a healthy, and respectable mindset. Likewise, I have no issue with the theory of evolution being questioned. It has been here, on these dozens of threads, hundreds of times. Each time, answers have been presented by numerous posters (although, I think the majority have been answered by Sal, who seems to have an undying dedication to this discussion).

I don't believe that the theory of evolution and the Bible are mutually exclusive at all, and as such feel that rejection of teaching ID in science class in no way detracts from the beliefs of Christians. I cannot tolerate the idea of something that just plain isn't science, being taught in the science classroom. In a theology classroom (if there was such a thing in high school)? Sure! But not in a science classroom. It's like trying to force the teaching of evolution in Sunday School. (yeah, I've said that before).

507 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 4:32:20pm

re: #468 Josephine

Sal,

I'm not trying to get in between you and wanumba here.

But the name-calling in your comments is too hostile for me. It's too ugly. It's the reason why I decided to put FinnAgain on GAZE and, to me, you sound like him when he blasted Render again and again and again. It's overkill.

I don't think wanumba deserves such abusive language on a repeated basis. Furthermore, I don't like reading it. I enjoy many of your comments but I might have to start scrolling past them.

I am not a monitor. I have no authority here. I'm asking, as a fellow lizard, if you would please take the high road here and argue your points without getting so personal.

I'm not familiar with wanumba but it sounds like he (she?) has done some very important work in a dangerous part of the world and I respect that. In the comments I have read, he has been respectful and polite (whether I agree with his points or not).

Josephine, I see that in intervening posts you have become more cognizant of the actual character |(or lack of same) of wanumba, since this odiferous trogldyte has also begun lying about Charles, our host. However, I just wanted to point out to you and all who read here how this viscid ghoul has lied about me.

In an attempt to guilt-trip anyone and everyone out of engaging in criticism of creationist shenanigans, wanumba posted the Sermon on the Mount, preceded by a quote from Charles that it tried to twist to its own dark purposes:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

I then immediately responded with my own version of the Sermon. You must have liked it, since you were one of the people who plussed it:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Blessed are the rational who refuse to swallow dogmatic bullshit, for they will be rewarded with the gifts of logic and reason.
Blessed are the spiritually brave, who refuse to be intimidated by threats of hellfire and damnation, for they have learned to consider the source.
Blessed are those who insist upon empirical evidence, for they will not be deceived as to the truths of contentions.
Blessed are you when people call you evil, and heretical, and blasphemous, and falsely say that you lie about the workings of the world.
Rejoice and be glad, for in the same way they persecuted Socrates, and Giordano Bruno, and Galileo before you. And many remember their names, but few remember the names of their persecuters.

wanumba proceeded to attack this statement, here:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

That's when he began to lie about me, insisting that I had said that Christians persecuted Socrates, when everyone knows, or should, that they didn't even exist that long ago. He also began lying about Charles at the same time, and in the same post, by misquoting him, and began comparing LGF to Kos, Andrew Sullivan, and Chinese Communists. You must not have liked this post, because you downdinged it. (s)he continued to attack and lie about Charles and myself here:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Excerpt:

You have not admonished him for being insulting to a portion of the greater LGF community and passing on falsehoods designed to smear Christians.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

And although I answered him/here here:

Socrates was not persecuted by Christians, but he was forced by the Athenian Senate to drink Hemlock because he dared to question the existence of Greek gods.

The idiotarian principle is the same; dare to think for yourself and reach a logical conclusion which we loath but cannot refute, and your messenger life is forfeit.

He took his lies about me to a second thread, first, just alluding to his/her lie about me:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Malicious disinformation and historical ignorance to intone that "THEY persecuted Socrates," too, don't you agree?

to be continued...

508 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 4:45:17pm

and then here, lyingly authoring and inserting a parenthetical reference to Christians in his/her 'quote' from me - a parenthetical reference that I never wrote - in order to slime me with it (that is, in order to slime me not with MY words, but with HIS lying words, illegitimately foisted off as mine):

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

re: #234 A. van Hilten
How do you think we felt when we saw this howler today?
""For in the same way they (Christians) persecuted Socrates."

Seems that there are other people out there who detest Christianity who will twist history for their own ends, too.

To which I replied:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

The 'they' that persecuted Socrates were those members of Athens who believed in the Gods, and viewed Socrates' doubting of them, in front of their youth, as heretical, blasphemous, and deserving of death. I notice you didn't mention Giordano Bruno and Galileo; the first was burned at the stake for heresy and the second was forced to recant (in effect, to tell a lie) in order to avoid the same fate. In each case, deity-believers were either killing apostates or forcing them to recant their apostasy under pain of death. The particular religion of the Athenians was not the religion of the Roman Catholic Church, but the principle was precisely the same.

And finally got fed up with the malicious and malevolent repetition of lies here:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

re: #235 wanumba

wanumba intentionally misquotes me in the service of his abject, utter, blatant and slanderous lie.

Now, the persecuters include Christians, but are NOT restricted to them; rather, the term refers to ALL of the savagely pious and devout throughout history who would dare to kill people or force them to lie in order to stay alive, in coercive service to their faith. And you will notice that wanumba LYINGLY INSERTED a parenthetical reference to Christianity that was NOT PRESENT in the original post; in other words, he is a lying fuckwad. I fucking HATE fucking liars; especially when they're fucking lying about ME.

I continued to call wanumba out on his/her fabricated lies about me here:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

It may not be polite to call someone what they have in fact proven themselves to be, but the truth, by definition, can be neither slander nor insult. And you have proven yourself to be a fucking liar, because you fucking lied about me. As I conclusively demonstrated in post# 241 in this thread.

And in addition, in that post, pointed out, onve again, what wanumba was lying about:

I fucking DO condemn those who burned Giordano Bruno, I condemn those who made Galileo choose betwen lying and death, and I firmly believe that if the same people who forced those choices upon those two martyrs of conscience had ruled in ancient Greece, thy would have had no compunction whatsoever about doing the precisely selfsame thing to Socrates that the Athenians did, any more than if the selfsame people who forced Socrates to drink hemlock had been in ecclesiastical power in Medieval Rome, they would have done exactly what the Roman Catholic Church did to Bruno and Galileo. It has to do less with a particular religion than it has to do with a coercive mindset that arrogates unto itself Divine license to torture and kill those who, in their eyes, transgress orthodoxy, either by what they say, or, in the case of the antisemitism that festered in Germany since Martin Luther published On The Jews And Their Lies back in 1534, who they are born as. And acolytes of ALL religions are susceptible to those particular seductive temptations. Including, historically speaking, yours - many times over. Deal with it.

to be continued...

509 Josephine  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 4:48:59pm

re: #507 Salamantis

Hi, Sal. Thanks for your response.

Yes, I followed that thread. I think I also disagreed with wanumba on that thread (or was it another one?).

I didn't ask you to change your mind about him/her; I was just hoping you would stick to the facts (as you did in #507 above) and not rely so much on profanity and invective. (You usually present your opinion in a straightforward way that I appreciate and enjoy reading.)

And, yes, I very much enjoyed your alternative "sermon".

510 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 4:50:06pm

And in the very next post, demanded that wanumba cease his/her self-servingly manufactured lies about me:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

I'd be a shitload happier if you would just stop fucking lying about me. But I have a strong hunch that that is far too much to hope for from the likes of you, for it seems to come quite easily to you; almost like second nature. After all, what's a little taqqiyah-esque Ninth Commandment breaking if it's done against those Satanic Atheistic Darwinian Evolutionists, for the Greater Glory of God? Surely He will be well pleased by the actions of His good and faithful servant, and you will be handsomely rewarded in Heaven for fighting the Good Fight...by whatever mendacious means were available.

But now, wanumba has transported his/her lies about me to yet a third thread: this one. (S)he must believe that (s)he can get some mileage out of the perpetuation of these lies, or else (s)he would not do it.

Don't let this repugnant toad - this utter disgrace to the honest and decent Christians with which (s)he shamelessly claims alliance - get away with it.

511 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:02:07pm

re: #470 evilrightwingnut

It seems to me the problem here is that a lot of people who frequent LGF believe in "creationism" in some form or another. And like me, when they see these threads here like this one, draw the conclusion that "I" as someone who believes in a creator am now being lumped in with Islamic Extremist terrorists.

Whether that's the point of this particular story or not, that's the conclusions being drawn, at least with this particular ID/Evolution post. And then when anyone of these people posts something there are no less that 50 people with responses like "go piss up a rope" or "you're an idiot". Or in some cases just have their posts deleted all together when they didn't even say anything bad or derogatory, just because they didn't agree(GASP) with Charles.

So instead of an intelligent and friendly discussion about this particular subject it just boils down to a flame fest and labeling any dissenters as trolls. I and many people like me who came to LGF in the first place because we are conservatives and enjoyed seeing all of the stories that Charles posts up calling out the idiot liberals and terrorists. Then when there are posts like this which insult our creation beliefs by lumping us in with terrorists and/or calling us backwards 1750's thinking morons.... well whatever... Just thought we as "conservatives" wouldn't stoop to eating our own like the filthy liberals do. Guess I was wrong.

Oh and I'm sure because I haven't been registered here for 28 years and have 394756892034 posts that makes anything I say invalid, correct?

I would suggest that you strive to eject the Islamocreationist firebug that the Disco Institute has invited into your Christocreationist house before you begin criticizing Charles the Fire Marshall for noting its presence there. Eventually, after you feed it, clothe it, and give it a place in our country to rest its head, it WILL try to burn your house down. The connections are real, and they need to be ended, for your own sake, and for the sake of your co-religionists, and indeed for the sake of all Americans. No good, at least for Christians or Americans, can come of such an alliance.

512 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:14:05pm

re: #476 wanumba

Dear readers,
We objected this week when Charles wrote that anyone who did not agree with his stated beliefs in evolution "ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED."

We pointed out that he'd made a statement of theological faith by stating positions about God and evolution theory, which are his business, but when he added "anyone who says otherwise ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED," and posted that on a nationally read blog, then he was opening the door to pure bigotry.

We told Charles directly that by THAT statement, he was inadvertently sanctioning a dangerous denigration of Orthodox Jews, Evangelical Catholics and Evangelical Protestants.

Charles has indeed stated that those who tell you that creationism and evolution are not compatible are not to be trusted. But why are they not to be trusted?

Because they lie.

The beginning of this universe has nothing to do with evolutionary theory. The beginning of life on this planet has nothing to do with evolutionary theory. What evolutionary theory has to do with is what the result is when already-present life, capable of random mutations, is confronted by a nonrandomly selecting surrounding environment, over a massive vista of time.

Since they address different topics, there is no logical or rational reason for creationism and evolutionary theory to be incompatible. As in fact, more than a billion Roman Catholics accept. And as Francis Collins accepts; a Christian and an accepter of evolutionary theory, who invented the manner by which genomes are decoded.

to be continued...

513 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:31:34pm

re: #476 wanumba

Since then, posted on this blog are statements that 80% of NAZIs were Christians so Christians murdered the Jews. We objected.

But why would wanumba object to what one of the main Christian sites on the Web, the publisher of the leading print Christian magazine on the planet (Christianity Today), and the producer of the Torchlighters series of DVDs, for the inculcation of Christian values in children, freely admits? Not because they are lying; they are not - but merely because some truths (including evolutionary theory) are personally uncomfortable to him/her. But the Christian History Institute has no problem with acknowledging them.

Here is the article in question:

[Link: chitorch.gospelcom.net...]

Here is their home page:

[Link: chitorch.gospelcom.net...]

Here is access to a complete Christian chronology by them:

[Link: chi.gospelcom.net...]

And here is the online access for Christianity Today Magazine:

[Link: www.christianitytoday.com...]

Salamantis has spent most of his time arguing a strawman he's created, projecting on to us what he THINKS we are, based on blatently grotesque and hate-filled stereotypes that he holds. Go back and read, keeping in mind the original warning I made. LGF would be no better than KOS.
Level of decency? Nah. Dump the debate, make it personal, attack the individual. Except of course, it's not actually the inidvidual, but a projection of hate onto an entire group. Having been caught up in religious/ethnic cleansing in real life, we have a heightened sense of how it starts with people denigrated and stereotyped and then isolated, then assigned all sorts of dark motivations and "NOT TO BE TRUSTED." Thus, the original warning.

This is turnspeak of the rankest and most gorge-rising order. I have shown wanumba to have lied about me, and wanumba has quite demonstrably lied about Charles as well. For wanumba to then possess the incalculable level of shameless chutzpah necessary to enable him/her to accuse those about whom (s)he has repeatedly been lying of instead lying about his/herself quite frankly boggles the mind.

Charles commented to tone down the language being generated, and a poster apologized - to Charles, not to the poster he was purposely targetting with abuse, which proves how sincere the apology was - a CYA to keep posting rights - and opportunity to abuse with impunity. Several posters have come in to also express the views that it was unnecessarily ugly, and they received abuse for their impudence to urge restraint.

wanumba owes both Charles and myself a public list apology for repeatedly lying about the both of us. Not that we'll ever get it from such a despicable creature.

To be continued...

514 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:35:26pm

re: #476 wanumba

So now what? How can a long time poster like wanumba post on anything on this blog without being arbitraily labelled, and pushed aside as suspect? Not to be trusted on what? Science, religion, math, politics, schools, education, geography? Automatically sent to LOWER than third class status, sub-human, stamped "NEANDERTHAL?" Posters on this blog have already declared they'd change doctors if they found out one was a practicing CHristian. Despite honorable and productive servce, shunned because of a litmus test? How many would say, "If I found out I had a gay doctor, I'd change?" NOOO can't say that. It'd be closeminded and bigoted. Or If the doctor walked in and I saw he was Black, I'd change doctors." NOOO! How disgusting. That's bigotry!
But, with no other considerations, "I wouldn't trust a Christian doctor. I want modern medicine." Say what?!?

The Andrew Sullivan Effect. Obsess on a topic that has personal importance, which becomes a vehicle to promote anti-Christian bigotry. Blog attracts a new kind of poster, and turns away long time fans and supporters.

wanumba is the one who has tunnelled him/herself into the subterranean depths of list distrust and dishonor, by his/her own lying words and actions concerning not only me, but also Charles as well, and (s)he has no one to blame those lying words and actions, and the loss of list respect that (s)he has suffered as a consequence, but him/herself.

515 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:36:38pm

...no one on whom to blame...

PIMF

516 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:43:56pm

re: #481 wanumba

Charles, please define how far TRUST goes.

You have made a statement of your own belief. You are announcing to everyone that it's final via the statement no other beliefs are valid - "not to be trusted."

This is a correct summary.

We have not lied. We offered the caution in good faith, because this is a very very serious matter and we believed you honestly did not realize the moral significance of what was stated.

All we are getting is jump ugly in return. You think we liked all this? Pushing to expose the quality of characters like Salamantis? We get nothing out of this, except hysterical abuse. You can say get the hell out of here, but remember, we didn't pretend to be your friend and flatter you and then spin on a dime and think we own the blog and act like blog attack dogs to evicerate other posters. We gave you an honest alarm in good faith that this was heading the wrong way. Flattery is a form of hatred. People do it to get something they want from other people.

It would have been fair and correct and gracious to have just replied that ya don't see it and therefore don't agree. Fine. Didn't have to resort to the accusation of "lying."

Via your compulsive lying about multiple posters on this list, including both the list owner and myself, it is your own character, or rather, I should say, your utter lack of same, that you have exposed, wanumba, for all to see. What you have revealed here about yourself and your manipulative and mendacious nature is not a pretty site to behold. You are one warped, crazed and twisted piece of work.

517 Jim D  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 5:47:15pm

re: #502 gunjam


Creationism: Good
Collaboration (even with the noblest of intentions) with those sympathetic to our enemies during a time of armed conflict: Not so much.

Noble intentions? Like subverting the US Constitution to have religion taught as science?

518 Salamantis  Wed, Jul 23, 2008 6:04:49pm

re: #504 LetMeIn

Don't you just LUV double standards? Expelled: No Intelligence was attacked for linking Darwinism and Nazi Germany...BUT you have continually tried to link ID with Islamic terrorists and creationists to discredit it.

I think you should stick with what you do well, instead of being so laughably inconsistent, and in cases ignorant (willingly or not, I do not know). And, out of curiosity, are atheists now creationists (see link below)?

[Link: spot.colorado.edu...]

LetMeIn

Registered since: Oct 16, 2007 at 6:23 pm

No. of comments posted: 5
No. of links posted: 0

Forthcoming by Bradley Monton, the guy that LetMeIn references:

Godless Physics: A Defense, forthcoming with Broadview Press.

“Physics-Based Design Arguments are Based on False Physics,” in progress.

“God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57: 405-424, June 2006.

He seems to be a cynical soul, hoping to write a book not to tell the truth of the matter, but instead to make moolah off the faithful. I predict that he will rake it in hand over fist. And be roundly debunked by his peers. And that his reputation will academically suffer for it, which will cause him to whine all the way to the bank.

519 Jimmah  Sat, Jul 26, 2008 8:59:20pm

re: #453 Salamantis

Sorry - misunderstanding - my comment was actually aimed at wanumba, as he was dragging an argument from one thread to another.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

BN Membership 125x125
More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Contains petroleum distillates.


Holiday Gift Guide - Save up to 45% on the seasons best!