LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

The Alvis Delk Cretaceous Footprint

Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:51:39 am PDT

Here’s a thread to discuss the earth-shattering discovery made by amateur archeologist Alvis Delk: Rock-solid proof?

Before we conclude that Darwin really was stupid after all, though, see:
Paluxy Dinosaur/’Man Track’ controversy.

Advertisement

1005 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:52:30am
2 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:52:48am

These boots are made for walking.

3 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:53:19am

That is the fakest thing I've ever seen.

4 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:53:24am

Now this little fellow would fit just fine on Noah's Ark.

5 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:54:15am

I don't know, I think this guy is a heel.

6 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:54:48am

You mean to tell me that NOTHING disturbed the footprint in the mud, not rain, snow, sleet, wind, other animals, plants, etc etc etc etc etc , that it left such a perfect imprint?

Why doesn't that happen today?

7 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:55:04am

So Was (Not Was) lied?

8 The Other Les  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:55:21am

Why does Bambi Versus Godzilla suddenly come to mind?

9 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:55:40am

Why do ducks have flat webbed feet?
Why do hominids have flat splayed feet?
Why do elephants have big flat feet?
Why do dinosaurs have enormous 3 toed feet?

Forest fires! It was all global warming folks.

10 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:55:41am
11 Opinionated  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:55:58am

Made by the previous Citizen of the World.

12 maddogg  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:56:04am

Damn! I need one of those to go with my Sasquach footprint collection.

13 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:56:06am

Sorry Charles, John McCain left that track.

14 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:56:14am

Hey, if you turn it right, you can also see the face of Obama, so it must be true!

15 filetandrelease  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:57:10am
“It is unbelievable, that’s what it is,” Alvis Delk, 72, said

Sums it up pretty well.

16 MandyManners  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:58:03am

What's that in the upper-left corner?

17 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:58:14am

An amateur removed the piece from it's location. Making in situ dating impossible and contaminating the find. Isotope dating will help, but it usefulness as evidence is hampered by it's removing with out a site study.

18 Spider Mensch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:58:56am

maybe like the dinosaur had just eaten the, ummm, caveman, like bit his head off and stuff,and, and, umm...he spit the foot out and it landed down where he just stepped, and, and he then ate some more cave guys, then the cave guys threw some spears at the dinosaur for eating their friend..and, and.........
/doing peepee dance

19 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:58:56am

Was the print left by Piltdown man?

20 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:59:00am

Sasquatch?

21 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:59:17am

re: #16 MandyManners

What's that in the upper-left corner?

Big toe.

22 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:59:35am

re: #20 Slumbering Behemoth

Sasquatch?

That was a kick ass "In search of"

23 dahozho  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:59:38am

This will fit nicely alongside the magic crystal skulls...

24 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:59:44am

re: #17 jcm

An amateur removed the piece from it's location. Making in situ dating impossible and contaminating the find. Isotope dating will help, but it usefulness as evidence is hampered by it's removing with out a site study.

Once glance is all it takes for me. Those prints were carefully carved out by hand.

25 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:59:45am
26 experiencedtraveller  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 11:59:58am

Noah killed the dinosaurs because they supported the invasion of Iraq.

27 snowcrash  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:00:02pm

I call B.S. The last 2 paragraphs immediatly tie the find into using it for "balanced educational teaching in the classroom". Just a little too convenient. IMO.

28 lawhawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:00:14pm

Some people will do anything for attention.

Piltdown man.
Cardiff Giant.

29 looking closely  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:00:17pm
30 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:00:31pm
31 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:00:34pm

re: #26 experiencedtraveller

Noah killed the dinosaurs because they supported the invasion of Iraq.

No, he killed them so that we could use them for oil.

32 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:00:52pm

That's one hell of a big toe.

Look at the hole it made.

And I'm not sure that's a dinasaur foot-print.

More likely, THIS or THIS.

33 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:01:02pm

re: #17 jcm

An amateur removed the piece from it's location. Making in situ dating impossible and contaminating the find. Isotope dating will help, but it usefulness as evidence is hampered by it's removing with out a site study.

Yeah, that is too bad, since right next to it was a gold coin with Jesus' face and the date 3977 BC clearly printed on it.

34 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:01:19pm

re: #24 zombie

Once glance is all it takes for me. Those prints were carefully carved out by hand.

Looks clay molded. Radio isotope dating will be interesting. The edges between the human toes look sharper than a weathered piece might.

35 Yishai  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:01:23pm

The man-toes are way too well-defined. It is not a footprint made while walking. It looks very fake.

36 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:01:23pm

Viewed upside down while inebriated, one can see a prophet surrounded by a halo.

Coincidence? I think not.

37 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:01:23pm

re: #31 JamesTKirk

No, he killed them so that we could use them for oil.

And they taste great on the grill

38 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:01:37pm

re: #22 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Didn't Leonard Nimoy (Spock) host that show?

39 Iron Fist  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:01:51pm

re: #24 zombie

The human print might be real. It might be! The "dinosaur" print not so much.

40 Inquisitive  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:02:24pm

"The estimated 140-pound stone was recovered in July 2000 "
In other words, the stone’s impressions indicate that the human stepped first, the dinosaur second. If proven genuine, the artifact would provide evidence that man and dinosaur roamed the Earth at the same time, according to those associated with the find and with its safekeeping. It could potentially toss out the window many commonly held scientific theories on evolution and the history of the world.

If it was found eight years ago and may have such scientific importance ...........why are we just now hearing/reading about it?

41 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:03:20pm

re: #40 Inquisitive

"The estimated 140-pound stone was recovered in July 2000 "
In other words, the stone’s impressions indicate that the human stepped first, the dinosaur second. If proven genuine, the artifact would provide evidence that man and dinosaur roamed the Earth at the same time, according to those associated with the find and with its safekeeping. It could potentially toss out the window many commonly held scientific theories on evolution and the history of the world.

If it was found eight years ago and may have such scientific importance ...........why are we just now hearing/reading about it?

Because "those associated with the find and with its safekeeping" are keeping it safe from anyone who can critically examine it and debunk it.

42 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:03:44pm

re: #38 Slumbering Behemoth

Didn't Leonard Nimoy (Spock) host that show?

Yup.

43 HelloDare  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:03:51pm

Fauxcheology

44 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:04:09pm

Smart edgy popular teachers will collect stuff like this for the Joke Wall Bulletin Board. Any body ever hear of the old JIR?

45 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:04:17pm

re: #39 Iron Fist

The human print might be real. It might be! The "dinosaur" print not so much.

It doesn't necessarily prove that humans were alive way back in dinosaur time; it could instead prove that some dinosaurs managed to survive into human time.

Anyone who reads Dilbert already knows that. They're hiding behind the sofas.

46 HelloDare  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:05:13pm

That not a dinosaur footprint. That's an impression of the top of Bart Simpson's head.

47 cutestguy[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:05:19pm
48 theheat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:05:55pm
“I seen the (human) track coming out and (saw) that it was a man,” Delk said. “I thought to myself, ‘Lord, I’ve been shown man was here when the dinosaur was here this will make a nice bookend to those Sasquatch print castings I have in the library'. Oh, and I better brush up on my English, while I'm at it, because only idiots say 'I seen something'.’”

I have a mental picture of the ID people banging their cages like baboons over this, and it isn't pretty.

FWIW - the "human" footprint looks suspiciously like Fred Flintsone's.

49 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:06:02pm

That's not a dinosaur! It's a Gorn!

Quick, where did I leave my charcoal, sulfur, diamonds, and bamboo?

50 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:06:02pm
51 Teacake!  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:06:36pm

I'm not sure if saying Darwin is tongue in cheek. Considering they didn't have internet, public library's or ways to carry out modern research....

52 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:07:01pm

re: #48 theheat

I have a mental picture of the ID people banging their cages like baboons over this, and it isn't pretty.

FWIW - the "human" footprint looks suspiciously like Fred Flintsone's.

Nope, the Flintstones (as cartoon characters) had only four fingers and four toes IIRC.

They are the transitional state.

53 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:07:01pm

re: #50 buzzsawmonkey

Where are the transitional footprints?

Checkmate.

54 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:08:05pm

Actually the dumbass time traveler that left that print has now caused a temporal paradox. The Universe is gonna explode...

55 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:08:06pm

That other print is clearly from a Sleestak.

So the human print is probably Marshall.

56 Ojoe  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:08:25pm

I always wondered what befell my grandpa.

Signed,

Regular Sasquatch.

57 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:08:54pm

re: #54 Peacekeeper

Actually the dumbass time traveler that left that print has now caused a temporal paradox. The Universe is gonna explode...

BHO's election is foreordained!

*Sound of Thunder* original short story not the dumbass movie.

58 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:09:09pm

That print came from a failed theme park somewhere in Central America.

59 HelloDare  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:09:15pm

Hey, what happened to the 24-hour rule? Or is it 48?

60 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:09:17pm

re: #55 Occasional Reader

That other print is clearly from a Sleestak.

So the human print is probably Marshall.


CHAKA!

61 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:09:23pm

re: #42 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

That show was something else, seen a few episodes of it when I was a little kid. Did they ever do an "In Search of...Santa Clause"?

+1 for the Tenacious D clip

62 mobaby  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:09:39pm

I read a couple articles on the link - it seems that what appears to be a human footprint may indeed be a dinosaur print. We cannot get any sizing from this image but the articles say they are not "giant" human footprints but dinosaur prints - so apparently the "human-like" prints are really big...

63 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:10:17pm
64 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:10:34pm

Every time he laid down some fresh, wet limestone, some damn fool had to step in it.

65 sattv4u2  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:10:35pm

re: #54 Peacekeeper

Actually the dumbass time traveler that left that print has now caused a temporal paradox. The Universe is gonna explode...

Not as long as we elect Barry Ruler On High!

66 Sifty  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:10:48pm

Batboy Slays T-Rex
-Enquirer story 64,000,000 BC

67 theheat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:10:50pm

re: #52 JamesTKirk

Okay, so maybe it was Fred and Wilma's offspring taking Dino for a walk.

68 M. Bensson-Levi  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:11:00pm

Piltdown Man, immediately comes to mind.

The actual stone is now in the possession of the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose, Texas.

Right.

69 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:11:22pm

re: #33 itellu3times

Yeah, that is too bad, since right next to it was a gold coin with Jesus' face and the date 3977 BC clearly printed on it.

And in the strata below was the core of the apple that Adam and Eve ate.

70 Ojoe  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:11:38pm

Piltdown Man

THis might also be an
E. Clampus Vitus

Hi-jink

71 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:11:54pm

What you need to find are some coprolites. One good pile deserves another.

72 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:12:37pm

One day we'll be the fossils and peeps will still be arguing over the stuff we left behind.

73 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:12:50pm

This hoax was already perpetrated once by Henry Morris in the Genesis Flood.

74 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:13:08pm

I would like to point out something about that "Dinosaur" print.

Here
Here
Here

Clearly, that is the footprint of The Famous SD Chicken.

75 sattv4u2  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:13:09pm

re: #69 JamesTKirk

And in the strata below was the core of the apple that Adam and Eve ate.

Can't be. I happen to have that core for sale on E-BAY right now, as well as Elvis's last ,, umm,,, welll,,,, meal!

76 WinterCat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:13:18pm

Unbelieveable. Truly.

77 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:13:24pm
78 M. Bensson-Levi  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:13:54pm

re: #71 rawmuse

What you need to find are some coprolites. One good pile deserves another.

:-)

79 coquimbojoe  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:13:55pm

re: #24 zombie

Once glance is all it takes for me. Those prints were carefully carved out by hand.

I can't tell that, I do think it is amazingly fortuitous that the guy wanted to send it to a creation group and then he serendipitously finds a previously undiscovered human print. Don't that just beat all?

80 madisonsfriend  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:14:07pm

re: #72 Peacekeeper

One day we'll be the fossils and peeps will still be arguing over the stuff we left behind.


Scientifically, of course

[Link: www.peepresearch.org...]

81 snowcrash  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:14:23pm

BTW, I have been to Dinosaur Valley in Glen Rose TX and have seen the dino tracks in the river. Cool and awesome. I believe this "new find" is a silly and unnecessary hoax until proven otherwise.

82 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:14:58pm

The giveaway is the depth of the impressions.

A dinosaur with a paw that big would weigh several tons. The impression that it would leave in the mud would be much much deeper than the impression made by a comparatively lightweight human. And yet the "human big toe" impression goes down further than any part of the "dinosaur" impression. Impossible

Of course, there are 65 million other problems with this childish hoax, but that's the first one that comes to mind.

83 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:15:04pm

re: #72 Peacekeeper

One day we'll be the fossils and peeps will still be arguing over the stuff we left behind.

Really? The human race will be followed by sentient marshmallow treats?

84 GoJeepGo  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:15:20pm

re: #22 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

That was a kick ass "In search of"

With Leonard Nimoy
Kickin out the jams?

85 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:15:29pm

My friends I have here genuine relics of Jesus for sale. What is that you say? You cannot afford a genuine relic of Jesus? You say your house is to small to hold a genuine relic of Jesus? Have no fear. Today we can sell you, at a significant discount, this lovely and convenient relic of the baby Jesus.

86 madisonsfriend  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:15:44pm

re: #83 JamesTKirk

Really? The human race will be followed by sentient marshmallow treats?

Sorry but note I beat you to the Peeps(tm) reference

87 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:16:09pm

Sergeant Hulka?

88 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:16:09pm

That is sedimentary stone, the bottom of the "human" print is well above the "dinosaur" print. That means that the "Human" print is much more recent.

89 ErnieG  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:16:10pm

re: #26 experiencedtraveller

Noah killed the dinosaurs because they supported the invasion of Iraq.

I thought it was because they ate all the unicorns.

90 uncleFuzzy  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:16:20pm

Does anyone want to venture an over/under on when this will be proven real or fake?

91 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:16:25pm

re: #75 sattv4u2

Can't be. I happen to have that core for sale on E-BAY right now, as well as Elvis's last ,, umm,,, welll,,,, meal!

You want to talk Elvis and archaeology, you need to read this.

92 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:16:51pm
93 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:17:10pm

re: #91 JamesTKirk

You want to talk Elvis and archaeology, you need to read this.


Romans were White?!?

94 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:17:30pm
95 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:17:31pm

re: #83 JamesTKirk

That was to be the plot of episode 83.

96 JamesTKirk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:17:44pm

re: #92 buzzsawmonkey

Reportedly, if one gathered together all the pieces of the True Cross that were circulating as relics in the Middle Ages, you'd have the equivalent of enough timber to frame a McMansion.

Obviously, those were actually pieces of Noah's Ark.

97 tex68  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:17:53pm

This creationism vs darwinism stuff is a little ridiculous...

People, if God exists then what is a day to God? Could be a million years, 10 million years? Problem with people of my faith they seem to take 6 days as 24 period per day. Maybe God made Dinosaurs got bored and decide to start over...the older God got the better he got at making things...when I was a kid I couldn't draw very well but I kept at it and slowly got better at it. Then, God left the world alone for a couple of day which to us could mean millions of years, and animals evoled on there own.

The Big bang theory? Bang! Matter was created? By whom? Until man can produce matter out of thin air...his theory is weak. Here's my theory God clapped his hands and bang, the universe started. I have know proof but it is as logical as bang!

I am sorry to tell most of the humans on this planet that we are in the infancy of our time on earth...but we think we know everything. Amazing.We can predict global warning but can't predict if it going to rain.

Just had to get some of it off my chest...I feel better.

98 madisonsfriend  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:18:20pm

re: #89 ErnieG

I thought it was because they ate all the unicorns.

Whoa, I thought the unicorns just drowned in the flood. I knew that didn't make sense- of course, the dinosaurs ate them!

99 Sabnen  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:18:47pm

When I was in high school, back in the '70's, I had an Earth Science teacher show us the Man/Dinosaur Track movie. We were a pretty skeptical/secular bunch before the movie and a pretty skeptical/secular bunch after the movie.

The teacher, recently born-again, wanted to talk to us about the movie sooo bad afterwards, but knew he was on thin ice showing us the flick in the first place such that he didn't dare chat about it.

100 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:19:12pm

re: #94 buzzsawmonkey

I abhor cheap sediment.

I took that for granite.

101 Big Steve  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:19:36pm

re: #40 Inquisitive

"The estimated 140-pound stone was recovered in July 2000 "
In other words, the stone’s impressions indicate that the human stepped first, the dinosaur second. If proven genuine, the artifact would provide evidence that man and dinosaur roamed the Earth at the same time, according to those associated with the find and with its safekeeping. It could potentially toss out the window many commonly held scientific theories on evolution and the history of the world.

If it was found eight years ago and may have such scientific importance ...........why are we just now hearing/reading about it?

Its been stored in a crop circle for safe keeping.

102 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:19:58pm

re: #16 MandyManners

What's that in the upper-left corner?

It's our newest, bestest big toe buddy.

103 uncleFuzzy  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:20:02pm

re: #84 GoJeepGo

Not quite Jim Nabors, but what did you expect?

104 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:20:15pm

re: #54 Peacekeeper

Actually the dumbass time traveler that left that print has now caused a temporal paradox. The Universe is gonna explode...

If only that time traveler had heard the advice my father gave me on my wedding day: "If you ever travel back in time, don't step on anything, because even the tiniest change can alter the future in ways you can't imagine."

105 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:20:19pm

re: #97 tex68

This creationism vs darwinism stuff is a little ridiculous...

People, if God exists then what is a day to God? Could be a million years, 10 million years? Problem with people of my faith they seem to take 6 days as 24 period per day. Maybe God made Dinosaurs got bored and decide to start over...the older God got the better he got at making things...when I was a kid I couldn't draw very well but I kept at it and slowly got better at it. Then, God left the world alone for a couple of day which to us could mean millions of years, and animals evoled on there own.

The Big bang theory? Bang! Matter was created? By whom? Until man can produce matter out of thin air...his theory is weak. Here's my theory God clapped his hands and bang, the universe started. I have know proof but it is as logical as bang!

I am sorry to tell most of the humans on this planet that we are in the infancy of our time on earth...but we think we know everything. Amazing.We can predict global warning but can't predict if it going to rain.

Just had to get some of it off my chest...I feel better.

Could I buy some pot from you?

106 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:20:40pm

Personally I think talking dinosaurs would have been a way cooler choice than pink talking monkeys, but I'm just glad to be here.

107 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:21:12pm
108 vbspurs  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:21:34pm

Charles, guys, heads up, Obama just said this at a campaign rally:

" But we could save all the oil they're talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and--and--and getting regular tune-ups. You could save just as much."

[Link: www.breitbart.tv...]

SOMEONE HELP AMERICA FROM THIS MAN'S PLANS...please.

109 madisonsfriend  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:22:18pm
Could I buy some pot from you?


Get a turtle

[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]

110 Big Steve  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:22:19pm

re: #107 buzzsawmonkey

Gneiss of you.

No schist

111 Annar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:22:30pm

But I could swear that foot print belonged to Kent Hovind.

112 tex68  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:22:30pm

re: #105 Ben Hur

I guess you didn't comprehend what I was getting too...probably all the pot you've been smoking.

113 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:22:39pm

PZ Myers: Transparent fakery

It's supposed to be a human footprint with that of an Acrocanthosaurus on top of it, showing that dinosaurs walked the earth after human beings.

Unfortunately, they both look ridiculously fake. The human print has toes like tubes and a wierdly dug-in big toe, and looks ridiculously fake. The dino print is even worse — it's basically a three-pronged flat plate, looking like it was modeled after the smooth bottoms of a plastic dinosaur toy. Here, for instance is a photo of a cast of an actual dinosaur print.

114 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:22:43pm

re: #83 JamesTKirk

Really? The human race will be followed by sentient marshmallow treats?

We are doomed to exactly that bleak future, unless we invest more in microwave directed energy weapons.

115 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:22:55pm
Before we conclude that Darwin really was stupid after all, though, see:
Paluxy Dinosaur/’Man Track’ controversy.

This is the footprint used by Morris: The "Burdick Print". There's a link to the picture there.

116 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:23:07pm

re: #92 buzzsawmonkey

Reportedly, if one gathered together all the pieces of the True Cross that were circulating as relics in the Middle Ages, you'd have the equivalent of enough timber to frame a McMansion.

To my surprise I heard the contrary. The total volume of officially recognized relics turns out to be smaller than feared. The wiki article on this seems reliable.

117 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:23:13pm

re: #28 lawhawk

Some people will do anything for attention.

Piltdown man.
Cardiff Giant.

Gah - there's a Cardiff in NY?
And here I was thinking to meself, like, why haven't I heard of that Giant? He'd have been carried into the stadium before every International, to make the opponents even more scared (especially the English), for sure ... and now he's not even fake Welsh ...

118 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:23:38pm

re: #104 Occasional Reader

If only that time traveler had heard the advice my father gave me on my wedding day: "If you ever travel back in time, don't step on anything, because even the tiniest change can alter the future in ways you can't imagine."

Imagine the uproar if that Dino had stomped a Budweiser can?

119 theheat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:24:00pm

re: #90 uncleFuzzy

If it's in the hands of the Discovery Institute, how 'bout the twelfth of never?

120 FreakyBoy  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:24:28pm

I hate it when those pesky velociraptors go through my garbage.

121 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:24:36pm

re: #118 Peacekeeper

Are we taking the Lexus to Aunt Patty & Selma's funeral?

122 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:24:39pm

re: #112 tex68

I guess you didn't comprehend what I was getting too...probably all the pot you've been smoking.

It was an obscure reference to Animal House.

Larry: [to Jennings, while high] Okay. That means that our whole solar system could be, like one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being. [Jennings nods] This is too much! That means one tiny atom in my fingernail could be--

Jennings: Could be one little tiny universe.

Larry: Could I buy some pot from you?

123 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:24:56pm

re: #114 Occasional Reader

We are doomed to exactly that bleak future, unless we invest more in microwave directed energy weapons.

That's a plot by the ultra intelligent Popcorn brains of 6500AD.

124 dahozho  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:25:06pm

re: #99 Sabnen

Oh, you were lucky. In my HS biology/science classes, there were plenty o'belivin' creationists. Can't tell you how many times I was screamed at, called a satanist, etc. because I didn't buy their drivel. The teachers were disappointed as well. (early 80s)

125 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:25:08pm

re: #122 Ben Hur

It was an obscure reference to Animal House.

Larry: [to Jennings, while high] Okay. That means that our whole solar system could be, like one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being. [Jennings nods] This is too much! That means one tiny atom in my fingernail could be--

Jennings: Could be one little tiny universe.

Larry: Could I buy some pot from you?

And dare I say, the BEST POST I'VE EVER POSTED.

126 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:25:41pm
127 uncleFuzzy  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:26:43pm

re: #119 theheat

Agreed.

I suspect they would keep that one close to the chest until they go under or get too desperate. Neither of which are gonna happen anytime soon.

128 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:26:56pm

What would we use to power the air pumps that fill our tires?

129 tex68  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:27:07pm

re: #122 Ben Hur

It was an obscure reference to Animal House.

Larry: [to Jennings, while high] Okay. That means that our whole solar system could be, like one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being. [Jennings nods] This is too much! That means one tiny atom in my fingernail could be--

Jennings: Could be one little tiny universe.

Larry: Could I buy some pot from you?

Got ya! Forgot about that part of the movie hadn't seen it in quite some time.

130 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:27:12pm

Run Uglug, RUN!

131 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:27:20pm
132 Diamond Bullet  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:27:37pm

I find the lack of globular clusters in the big toe compelling.

133 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:27:57pm

re: #128 Ben Hur

What would we use to power the air pumps that fill our tires?

Bicycle pump.

134 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:28:03pm

re: #131 buzzsawmonkey

Have you never used a hand tire pump?

Only one week a month.

135 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:28:06pm

re: #73 Sharmuta

This hoax was already perpetrated once by Henry Morris in the Genesis Flood.

A total crock of coprolite.

136 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:28:50pm

re: #54 Peacekeeper

Actually the dumbass time traveler that left that print has now caused a temporal paradox. The Universe is gonna explode...

I have VERY vague memories of a sci-fi short story from the 50's or 60's. Paleontologists warp back into time, with a Jeep. One manages the return trip to present-day. The other (with the Jeep) doesn't make it. The first goes excavating the riverbed where he and his friend had been. He finds jeep tracks, then Tyrannosaurus tracks ... chasing the long-gone jeep. tum da dum dum

137 experiencedtraveller  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:29:09pm

re: #131 buzzsawmonkey

Have you never used a hand tire pump?

Is that a type of hand jive?

138 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:29:17pm

Anyone ever seen an old animated movie called BC Rock. Freaking hysterical. I have never been able to find it on DVD (though I admit it has been a while since I have looked)

139 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:29:45pm

re: #83 JamesTKirk

Really? The human race will be followed by sentient marshmallow treats?

Along with their Twinkie pets.

140 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:30:06pm
141 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:30:24pm

re: #94 buzzsawmonkey

I abhor cheap sediment.

This thread rocks!

142 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:30:32pm

re: #136 pre-Boomer Marine brat

I read the story, too... I think it was either Asimov or Clarke. I recall that the last T-Rex tracks uncovered are closer and closer together, as the dino was catching up to the Jeep.

143 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:30:48pm
144 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:31:03pm

we will all be long dead , and the next groups of beings will be snacking on our twinkies

145 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:31:05pm

These Creationist make the same mistake that some scientist do: you won't find God by digging in the ground.

146 The Shadow Do  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:31:20pm

So the evidence suggests that the Garden of Eden was in Mineral Wells, Texas?

Nope, ain't buying that. Trust me on this one.

147 M. Bensson-Levi  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:31:37pm

re: #94 buzzsawmonkey

I abhor cheap sediment.

Low. Really low.

148 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:32:08pm

re: #100 Kenneth

I took that for granite.

That's not gneiss.

149 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:32:09pm

re: #109 madisonsfriend

Get a turtle

[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]

What an a-hole.

150 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:32:15pm

re: #143 buzzsawmonkey

every is stoned?

151 Annar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:32:17pm

re: #98 madisonsfriend

Whoa, I thought the unicorns just drowned in the flood. I knew that didn't make sense- of course, the dinosaurs ate them!

The hollow ones floated and formed the YEC movements in Turkey and North America.

152 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:32:27pm

re: #113 Killgore Trout

It does look fake- as fake as a five and dime diamond ring.

153 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:32:31pm

re: #128 Ben Hur

What would we use to power the air pumps that fill our tires?

What sort of products are involved in a car's tune-up? How are they made?

/Obama is a genius, I tells ya. Next up: Conserve our milk resources, buy cheese!

154 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:33:04pm

One day, in the far, far future, our sun will transform itself in to a red giant. Then, our oceans will boil off and everything on the earth will be a frikkin' cinder.

So, in light of that, it is all the more urgent to make the SF Lizard meet-up on Friday 5-7pm. Email me for details.

155 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:33:20pm

re: #142 Occasional Reader

I read the story, too... I think it was either Asimov or Clarke. I recall that the last T-Rex tracks uncovered are closer and closer together, as the dino was catching up to the Jeep.

Yes. "tum da dum dum"

I can't remember how it ends. Someone as good as Asimov of Clarke could well have left it hanging (and the reader's nails shredding the copy of Analog in wide-eyed ... ARRGHH.)

156 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:33:33pm

re: #138 Ford_Prefect

"What are ya gonna do, stick a cork up my..."

157 Kerfuffle  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:34:08pm

Sorry to distract from the ongoing Darwin/creation/ID obsession, but did you see the story of the man who decapitated someone on a Greyhound bus last night?

Yikes, some bold demons prowling about.

158 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:34:35pm

re: #155 pre-Boomer Marine brat

I can't remember how it ends.

I think THAT'S how it ends... our narrator relating the T-rex tracks closing in on his friend's Jeep. The rest is left to your imagination.

159 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:34:39pm

re: #157 Kerfuffle

Sorry to distract from the ongoing Darwin/creation/ID obsession, but did you see the story of the man who decapitated someone on a Greyhound bus last night?

Yikes, some bold demons prowling about.


Survival of the fittest.

160 arf  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:34:46pm

Off-topic, sorry.

Has anyone read "After Bush" by Lynch and Singh (Cambridge University Press) ?

The authors lay out a case for continuing foreign policy along the lines of what has been done in the Bush administration.

One of the reviews: "This provocative account dares to counter the dogma of Bush's Beltway detractors and his ideological enemies, boldly arguing that Bush's policy deservedly belongs within the mainstream of the American foreign policy tradition."

Reviews seem to run along those lines. I've only seen the ads, haven't spotted it in my bookstore. Perhaps someone in this august pack of lizards has seen it.

161 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:34:47pm

Wanna have fun? Get some concrete, a bucket and mix any combination of objects that you'd care to have them puzzle ove in 1,000,000 years.

There is no rational explanation for a coke and a pepsi to be in the same strata as tofu and Al Gores face..

162 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:34:51pm

re: #146 The Shadow Do

So the evidence suggests that the Garden of Eden was in Mineral Wells, Texas?

Nope, ain't buying that. Trust me on this one.

How about Van Horn?

163 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:34:53pm

re: #141 pre-Boomer Marine brat

This thread rocks!

We take it for granite that this thread is very gneiss. Shale we continue without a fault?

164 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:35:18pm

re: #156 Slumbering Behemoth

"What are ya gonna do, stick a cork up my..."

"I can't believe you stuck a cork up my...

Not bad. Not to f*cking bad."

165 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:35:42pm

re: #157 Kerfuffle
too many are losing their heads lately. (ack sorry)

166 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:35:51pm

re: #154 rawmuse

One day, in the far, far future, our sun will transform itself in to a red giant.

No, brother. We are witnessing the moment when the planet began to heal itself, and the oceans stopped rising, and the sun began to renew itself. Change.

167 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:35:51pm

re: #126 buzzsawmonkey

Very interesting. It appears that my information may have been both inaccurate and incomplete.

Now now that's OK. I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

/duck

168 Sabnen  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:36:05pm

re: #124 dahozho

Good for you not to buy their drivel. Frankly, we were all dumb-founded this guy showed us the film, but we were such that none of us ratted him out or complained. We were more embarrassed for him than anything.

This stuff just keeps coming around and around again. Kind of like a "sucker born every minute" a new generation has to learn (unlearn?) this lesson every time it's presented. That's not progress, that's treading water. I wish we could move along.

169 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:36:12pm

re: #155 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Yes. "tum da dum dum"

I can't remember how it ends. Someone as good as Asimov of Clarke could well have left it hanging (and the reader's nails shredding the copy of Analog in wide-eyed ... ARRGHH.)

Actually the guy driving the jeep set off global warming which killed the dinosaurs that were chasing him...

170 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:36:19pm

re: #157 Kerfuffle

Sorry to distract from the ongoing Darwin/creation/ID obsession, but did you see the story of the man who decapitated someone on a Greyhound bus last night?

Yikes, some bold demons prowling about.

There's supposed to be an RCMP briefing this afternoon, Manitoba time.

171 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:37:23pm

re: #158 Occasional Reader

I think THAT'S how it ends... our narrator relating the T-rex tracks closing in on his friend's Jeep. The rest is left to your imagination.

SHIT!
My mouse just splintered!
/lingering memories

172 geata  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:37:57pm

Karl Rove was definitely in on this.

173 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:38:14pm

re: #171 pre-Boomer Marine brat

SHIT!
My mouse just splintered!
/lingering memories

I thought Splinter was a rat.

174 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:38:15pm
175 wolfie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:38:32pm

re: #124 dahozho

Oh, you were lucky. In my HS biology/science classes, there were plenty o'belivin' creationists. Can't tell you how many times I was screamed at, called a satanist, etc. because I didn't buy their drivel. The teachers were disappointed as well. (early 80s)


What did your parents do? I can't think of any parents I know who wouldn't have been down at school in 30 seconds raising a whole lot of trouble if their kid had been "screamed at, called a satanist."

What state and school district was this anyway?

176 ErnieG  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:38:41pm

re: #170 pre-Boomer Marine brat

There's supposed to be an RCMP briefing this afternoon, Manitoba time.

Maybe they'll put Sergeant Preston on the case.

177 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:39:19pm

re: #157 Kerfuffle

Sorry to distract from the ongoing Darwin/creation/ID obsession, but did you see the story of the man who decapitated someone on a Greyhound bus last night?

Yikes, some bold demons prowling about.

Good grief.

178 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:39:20pm

re: #173 CyanSnowHawk

I thought Splinter was a rat.

Algernon

179 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:39:26pm

re: #173 CyanSnowHawk

I thought Splinter was a rat.

Fits in well with the turtle discovering the marijuana field earlier in this thread.

180 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:39:39pm

Via HotAir

The Church Of Obama

As Obama has become a symbol for all that is good, it has become important to differentiate between the denominations that constitute the Church of Obama:

*Southern Obamaists: This is the chief fundamentalist sect of Obamaism. Their most important tenets are that every word spoken by Obama is to be taken literally and that there are no contradictions in anything he has ever written. They also believe that the world was created 46 years ago.

*Evangelical Obamaists: This denomination is hard to distinguish from the Southern Obamaists politically, but in appearance its members are less dour, put more focus on spreading the word of Obama, and will often sway to the music at Obama rallies (hips not included). They are often referred to as Born Again Barackites, as they have voted for other candidates from different parties in the past, but have been baptized by re-registering.

*Universalist Unitarian Obamaists: This denomination believes there are other politicians besides Obama, but they enjoy the fellowship of the weekly campaign events. They are the least reliable Obamaists, as they aren’t certain if they will vote for Obama, or if he even exists at all.

*Catholic Obamaists: This group is split between those who are going through the motions because they long ago gave up believing in all but the most basic precepts of Obamaism, while the other half of the group is made up of traditionalists and new recruits who tend to be older. Both groups are united in their ignoring of the stricture against using non-union made rubber jackets.

*Pentecostal Obamaists: They believe in demonstrations of faith looked down upon by other denominations. For example, they believe their faith in Obama will allow them to drink non organic green tea and to eat non-local, non-free range chicken without being exposed to any side effects. This denomination includes many congregants who become so excited when they speak about Obama that they often appear to be speaking gibberish (known as speaking in tongues), as well as members who attend Obama rallies and pass out after being filled with Obama (known as slaying in the spirit).

*Abamaists: This is a small group that is made up of arrogant members who mistakenly think they are the smartest people in the world. After Hillary lost the primary, they no longer believe there is a Democrat nominee.

181 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:39:51pm

re: #174 itellu3times

Relevant to all today's threads:

Al Gore Places Infant Son In Rocket To Escape Dying Planet

So long and thanks for all the fish.

182 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:40:01pm

re: #161 Peacekeeper

Wanna have fun? Get some concrete, a bucket and mix any combination of objects that you'd care to have them puzzle ove in 1,000,000 years.

There is no rational explanation for a coke and a pepsi to be in the same strata as tofu and Al Gores face..

Reminds me of those lame "time capsules" that are opened after like 40 years. Ooh, look, 8-track tapes!

183 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:40:03pm

re: #171 pre-Boomer Marine brat

SHIT!
My mouse just splintered!
/lingering memories

What did you do? Stomp on it?
(Be kind to your mice - they can bite back ...)

184 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:40:58pm

re: #163 Honorary Yooper

We take it for granite that this thread is very gneiss. Shale we continue without a fault?

Let's get to the core of the matter.

185 Vergeltung  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:41:03pm

re: #157 Kerfuffle

Sorry to distract from the ongoing Darwin/creation/ID obsession, but did you see the story of the man who decapitated someone on a Greyhound bus last night?
Yikes, some bold demons prowling about.

only a few dozen times or so. tell us more. ;)

186 uncleFuzzy  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:41:06pm

re: #174 itellu3times

Hilarious! I particularly like the caption on the photo, "Young Gore sets out for his new home, where the sky is clear, the water is clean, and there are no Republicans." Thank you, the Onion.

187 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:41:34pm

re: #182 Occasional Reader

Reminds me of those lame "time capsules" that are opened after like 40 years. Ooh, look, 8-track tapes!

I love hearing about the ones that get lost. School is built, they bury a time capsule, 30, 40, 50 years later they can't find it.

188 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:42:06pm

re: #164 Ford_Prefect

I saw that film many years ago. The dragon scene is the only one I remember.

189 Sabnen  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:42:09pm

re: #136 pre-Boomer Marine brat

I thought that was a ride at Epcot.

190 Tigger2005  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:42:24pm

re: #63 buzzsawmonkey

"There were giants in those days," if you recall Genesis.

Giants with 3 toes?

191 J.S.  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:42:37pm

re: #170 pre-Boomer Marine brat

They held the press conference a short time ago. and the RCMP isn't releasing any details with respect to the perp -- the RCMP say that the perp has yet to be charged. When the perp's charged, then they'll release the details. All they're saying right now is that the perp is 40 years old and male and "out of province" (that is, not a resident of Manitoba.) (the perp, imo, was definitely psychotic.)

192 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:42:41pm

re: #183 yma o hyd

What did you do? Stomp on it?
(Be kind to your mice - they can bite back ...)

Oh, I was just remembering the suspense build-up in the sci-fi story we were discussing. Maybe not Poe-like, but very well done.

193 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:43:02pm

goliath

194 lawhawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:43:10pm

Completely OT and Urgent:

If anyone in the NYC metro area has had to deal with a spinal surgeon and can recommend someone who is knowledgeable about compression fractures and complications or masses associated with the spine, please contact me. MRI and CT scans have been run, and the prognosis isn't exactly positive.

We're looking for a second opinion after getting an opinion from the team at Hospital for Special Surgery. Any information would be greatly appreciated.

195 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:43:27pm

we should have checked out his feet

196 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:43:29pm

re: #192 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Oh, I was just remembering the suspense build-up in the sci-fi story we were discussing. Maybe not Poe-like, but very well done.

:-)))

197 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:43:32pm

re: #171 pre-Boomer Marine brat

SHIT!
My mouse just splintered!
/lingering memories

Ray Bradbury, Sound of Thunder, 1952

198 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:43:33pm

re: #191 J.S.

They held the press conference a short time ago. and the RCMP isn't releasing any details with respect to the perp -- the RCMP say that the perp has yet to be charged. When the perp's charged, then they'll release the details. All they're saying right now is that the perp is 40 years old and male and "out of province" (that is, not a resident of Manitoba.) (the perp, imo, was definitely psychotic.)

Thanks very much. Saves me some time.

199 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:43:55pm

re: #197 jcm

Ray Bradbury, Sound of Thunder, 1952

Nope, different story.

200 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:44:07pm

re: #188 Slumbering Behemoth

I saw that film many years ago. The dragon scene is the only one I remember.

STEWIE!

I am convinced that the voice of the dragon was Bill Murray, though he was not credited.

201 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:45:00pm

re: #199 Occasional Reader

Nope, different story.

That's right Sound of Thunder is the Butterfly Effect.

202 The Shadow Do  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:45:02pm

re: #162 pre-Boomer Marine brat

No, only lizards there I'm afraid.

203 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:45:03pm

re: #194 lawhawk

Completely OT and Urgent:

If anyone in the NYC metro area has had to deal with a spinal surgeon and can recommend someone who is knowledgeable about compression fractures and complications or masses associated with the spine, please contact me. MRI and CT scans have been run, and the prognosis isn't exactly positive.

We're looking for a second opinion after getting an opinion from the team at Hospital for Special Surgery. Any information would be greatly appreciated.

Obviously I don't know anybody - but prayers for the patient, and you.

204 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:45:34pm

re: #194 lawhawk
will say refuah shlema , i know of no-one

205 theheat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:45:43pm

re: #127 uncleFuzzy

This rerminds me very much of the famous faked historical documents sold to the Mormon church by Mark Hofmann, in more ways than one. Oddly enough, the very people responsible for, or claiming authentication, are the same people in possession of said artifacts. Methinks there is more to these tracks than we'll ever know.

The Patterson Sasquatch tracks were also "authenticated", even though there was a lot of evidence after the fact the entire thing was a well-planned hoax, using a lumbering hulk of a man from Yakima that actually did walk like that, and a fur suit purchased from a Hollywood costume maker. But to the people who want to believe in Bigfoot, those tracks were 100% real, could not have been faked.

Umm... really good fakes have been pulled off more than once.

206 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:46:01pm

re: #194 lawhawk

Yikes.

No useful info at the moment, sorry.

Thoughts with you (your family?).

207 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:46:02pm

re: #194 lawhawk

Completely OT and Urgent:

If anyone in the NYC metro area has had to deal with a spinal surgeon and can recommend someone who is knowledgeable about compression fractures and complications or masses associated with the spine, please contact me. MRI and CT scans have been run, and the prognosis isn't exactly positive.

We're looking for a second opinion after getting an opinion from the team at Hospital for Special Surgery. Any information would be greatly appreciated.

Good luck to you, wish I did, Might be facing similar issues if I can get workman's comp to ok my getting a diagnosis.

208 dahozho  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:46:30pm

re: #175 wolfie

The screaming and name-calling was done by students, not teachers. The teachers could be fairly oblivious.

The students (some had been friends) were caught up in the whole 'born-again' fevor in that time & place. Most have grown out of it. They never would have laid a hand on me-- never would've gotten away with it. (Tall, athletic, never been in a fight in my life, but have the attitude that if you start something, I'll finish it. Which does seem to work, even if you don't know about the martial arts background. Oh, and yeah, father on the bench.) Actually, we're normally a fairly well-educated bunch in IA.

209 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:46:37pm

re: #184 Cygnus

Let's get to the core of the matter.

As long as we can do so without basalting one another, or getting too sedimental.

210 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:46:47pm

re: #200 Ford_Prefect

Actually I just did a google search for BC Rock and it apparently is on DVD now. I will have to get that. I bet that my wife just won't get it though. Definitely more guy humor.

211 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:46:53pm

re: #197 jcm

Ray Bradbury, Sound of Thunder, 1952

Not it, but interesting.

212 uncleFuzzy  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:47:01pm

re: #184 Cygnus

Let's get to the core of the matter.

You two would be real gems if you allow me to say that you crack me up. I understand the foundation of your conversation, and appreciate this peak inside, however, the refuge I am seeking cannot be found here.

213 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:47:07pm

Lawhawk
God Bless.

214 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:47:14pm
215 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:47:37pm

re: #200 Ford_Prefect


I am convinced that the voice of the dragon was Bill Murray, though he was not credited.

Heh, turns out you're correct.

Originally a French film, Murray did the voice in the English dubbed version.

216 lawhawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:47:59pm

I'm reluctant to give more information about who my request for information relates to, but appreciate the warm wishes, thoughts and prayers. They are certain to come in handy.

217 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:48:07pm

re: #197 jcm

Ray Bradbury, Sound of Thunder, 1952

Love Ray Bradbury. I often find myself rereading passages because of the vivid imagery in his prose.

218 arf  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:48:16pm

They keep finding these severed feet washing up on beaches in British Columbia.

[Link: www.cbc.ca...]

Maybe this guy switched ends.

219 KSK  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:48:24pm

The Dino ate my homework

220 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:49:10pm

re: #202 The Shadow Do

No, only lizards there I'm afraid.

A veritable hill 'a monsters.

/naw ... gotta try again

221 Cap'n DOC  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:49:33pm

From the link:

The actual stone is now in the possession of the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose, Texas.

Does this not tell us something, people?

222 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:49:40pm
223 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:49:47pm

re: #215 Slumbering Behemoth

Heh, turns out you're correct.

Originally a French film, Murray did the voice in the English dubbed version.

I did not know that it was originally french. That actually kind of ruins it for me. Oh well, I will have to just pretend I never read that. NANANANANANA

224 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:50:03pm

re: #219 KSK

The Dino ate my homework

That's what they all parrot*.

/*well, they may not eat homework, but modern-day dinos do like to leave those wonderful white droppings all over cars.

225 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:50:10pm

understood

226 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:50:13pm
The butterfly the ancient Grecians made
The soul's fair emblem, and its only name--
But of the soul, escaped the slavish trade
Of mortal life !--For in this earthly frame
Ours is the reptile's lot, much toil, much blame,
Manifold motions making little speed,
And to deform and kill the things whereon we feed.


Psyche, Samuel taylor Coleridge 1808

227 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:50:34pm

re: #210 Ford_Prefect

Actually I just did a google search for BC Rock and it apparently is on DVD now. I will have to get that. I bet that my wife just won't get it though. Definitely more guy humor.

Read some of the comments on IMDB, if the DVD is an Australian version chances are that it wont be the same as the version you've seen in the past.

228 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:50:54pm
229 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:51:31pm

Reptiles get it? Unh you lot don't know your samuel Coleridge's from your motherfuckin' Samuel Jacksons...

230 The Shadow Do  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:51:37pm

re: #220 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Ok, you got me?.....

231 Cap'n DOC  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:52:15pm

re: #228 buzzsawmonkey

Oooooh. Ding-up for that one.

232 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:52:52pm

re: #221 Cap'n DOC

From the link:

Does this not tell us something, people?

What you expect 'em to give to UT or A&M?

233 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:53:23pm

re: #174 itellu3times

Relevant to all today's threads:


Al Gore Places Infant Son In Rocket To Escape Dying Planet

That was great! I liked the related article to:

'Time' Publishes Definitive Obama Puff Piece


"When the American people cast their vote this November, this is the piece of fluff they're going to remember," Stengel said. "Not the ones by Newsweek, Harper's, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, The New Republic, The Economist, Nightline, The Wall Street Journal, or even that story about lessons Obama learned from his first-grade teacher we ran a month ago."
234 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:54:03pm

re: #219 KSK

The Dino ate my homework

No kidding. One of my memories from 7-years-old is of a dream in which a gentle brontosaurous stuck his head in my bedroom window and kindly ate the dirty clothes laying on the floor. I'd undoubtedly been catching hell from my parents about the mess.

235 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:54:11pm

re: #200 Ford_Prefect

STEWIE!

I am convinced that the voice of the dragon was Bill Murray, though he was not credited.

Here is the imdb link.

French film from 1980. Le Chaînon manquant (The Missing Link)
Released in the US as B.C. Rock.

Just a guess about the availability, but the thing that held up the Heavy Metal video release for so long was the music rights.

236 Hhar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:54:26pm

This print is illustrated in more detail here:

[Link: www.creationevidence.org...]

particularly amusing is the utterly useless "CT scan". Normally, a high resolution CT scan might be invaluable for looking at deformation patterns in the sediment, but the example provided is risable.

237 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:55:13pm

What if it's real?

238 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:55:47pm

re: #229 Peacekeeper

Reptiles get it? Unh you lot don't know your samuel Coleridge's from your motherfuckin' Samuel Jacksons...

That's Samuel L. Jackson to you.

239 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:03pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

It's not.

240 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:11pm

re: #235 CyanSnowHawk

Here is the imdb link.

French film from 1980. Le Chaînon manquant (The Missing Link)
Released in the US as B.C. Rock.

Just a guess about the availability, but the thing that held up the Heavy Metal video release for so long was the music rights.

That could be. I remember there being some good music in the English speaking version.

241 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:24pm

re: #230 The Shadow Do

Ok, you got me?.....

Yeah, it was pretty bad.
"hill 'a monsters"
"Gila Monsters"

242 Abu Lahab  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:26pm

The NCSE (National Center for Science Education) had long and very helpful articles on this issue
See
Here
Here

243 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:35pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

What do you mean "what if"?

244 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:40pm
245 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:57pm

/

246 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:56:59pm

re: #239 Sharmuta

It's not.


But what if it is?

247 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:57:29pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

What if Obama is right, and giving car an oil-change helps conserve, um, oil.

248 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:57:37pm

re: #226 Peacekeeper

Manifold motions making little speed,

Could be a fuel injector problem.

249 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:57:38pm

re: #232 jcm

What you expect 'em to give to UT or A&M?

The Aggies sure wouldn't know the difference.

/death wish

250 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:57:57pm

re: #246 Ben Hur

But what if it is?

Then Lucy you got some 'splainin' to do.

251 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:02pm

Well then, we would find out yet again that we really have only scratched the surface of all that we do not know.

252 The Shadow Do  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:07pm

re: #217 Ford_Prefect

Love Ray Bradbury. I often find myself rereading passages because of the vivid imagery in his prose.

Just so. Something Wicked this Way Comes. Vivid imagery indeed. I read it many years ago (more than once), but still remember the effect of his description of arm hairs standing on end as the circus approached - a sensation that is hard to describe, but certainly evil scary in a simple verbal snapshot.

253 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:27pm

re: #229 Peacekeeper

Reptiles get it? Unh you lot don't know your samuel Coleridge's from your motherfuckin' Samuel Jacksons...

You are the albatross around LGF's neck.

254 snowcrash  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:33pm

re: #237 Ben Hur
Time travel exists in the future!

255 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:36pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

No chance!
Ever looked at human footprints on the beach, just after the tide has gone out? Any of them ever looked like that sorry attempt?
And thats just for starters ...

256 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:40pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

It's real in the sense that it exists & has corporeal form.

257 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:43pm

re: #228 buzzsawmonkey

The actual stone is now in the possession of the Creation Created Evidence Museum in Glen Rose, Texas.

Dan Rather, proprietor.

258 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:58:47pm
259 The Shadow Do  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:59:03pm

re: #241 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Ooooooh

260 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:59:15pm

re: #255 yma o hyd

No chance!
Ever looked at human footprints on the beach, just after the tide has gone out? Any of them ever looked like that sorry attempt?
And thats just for starters ...


Couldn't the same be said for dinosaur prints?

261 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 12:59:18pm

i wish Obama would have suggested no stop lights

262 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:10pm

re: #246 Ben Hur

But what if it is?

And what if monkeys fly out of my butt?

263 tgibson1962  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:11pm

re: #261 willowone

i wish Obama would have suggested no stop lights

While in the crosswalk?

264 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:12pm

Maybe the dragon tales that are found in cultures that would have never interacted were the stories of the last dinosaurs.

265 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:20pm

re: #256 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

Good point!
Its real all right.

266 RickZ  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:21pm

re: #40 Inquisitive

"The estimated 140-pound stone was recovered in July 2000 "
In other words, the stone’s impressions indicate that the human stepped first, the dinosaur second. If proven genuine, the artifact would provide evidence that man and dinosaur roamed the Earth at the same time, according to those associated with the find and with its safekeeping. It could potentially toss out the window many commonly held scientific theories on evolution and the history of the world.

If it was found eight years ago and may have such scientific importance ...........why are we just now hearing/reading about it?

The lack of universal health care.

267 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:24pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

Of course it's real. Do you think those things in Jurassic Park were FAKE?!

268 lifeofthemind  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:41pm

Later folks

269 Ford_Prefect  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:45pm

I don't know about this footprint, but the ones I am about to leave are real enough. Later Lizards. Happy posting.

270 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:52pm

re: #263 tgibson1962
well i wouldn't go that far, buti did laugh at that

271 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:53pm

re: #262 Sharmuta

And what if monkeys fly out of my butt?

monkey or monkeys?

272 Racer X  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:00:56pm

What if people wanted so much to believe in their faith, that they faked something to try and prove it?

273 E.T.  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:01:02pm

So if man and dino really did walk the earth together why are there no cave drawings of this ? ... I would think that cave drawings would be more common

274 Iron Fist  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:01:16pm

re: #261 willowone

When Obama is President god, it will be all green lights, in all directions, all the time.

275 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:01:32pm

re: #261 willowone
I WAS THINKING,NO SPEED LIMIT!
THE SOONER YOU GET TA WHERE YOUR GOING ,THE SOONER YOUR OUTTA THE WAY!
Or something like that!

276 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:01:41pm

re: #271 Ben Hur

monkey or monkeys?

Once the first one is out, the rest aren't such a PITA.

277 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:01:44pm

re: #272 Racer X

What if people wanted so much to believe in their faith, that they faked something to try and prove it?

Then it wouldn't be the first time.

278 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:01:59pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

I'm with Buzzsaw on his #244

279 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:02:03pm

re: #260 Ben Hur

Couldn't the same be said for dinosaur prints?

During your times of trial and suffering, when you see only one set of footprints, it was then that the dinosaur carried you.

280 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:02:24pm

i was sad to realize no-one had a rake back then.

281 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:02:28pm

re: #260 Ben Hur

Couldn't the same be said for dinosaur prints?

Yep.
But if we're to believe that the human stepped over the dino footprint - then the dino footprint should have been more eroded already.

282 geata  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:03:07pm

Why can nobody answer BH's question? I too am curious. Let's pretend someone really did find a fossil that showed a dinosaur stepping over a human footprint. What would this mean? I don't see why people seem incapable of even imagining that their previous scientific ideas could possibly be proven to be in error in any way.

283 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:03:23pm

re: #273 E.T.

So if man and dino really did walk the earth together why are there no cave drawings of this ? ... I would think that cave drawings would be more common


[Link: skepticwiki.org...]

284 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:03:27pm

re: #282 geata

Thought I did...

285 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:03:34pm

re: #274 Iron Fist

re: #275 reloadingisnotahobby

286 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:03:35pm
287 NoSubmission  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:03:36pm

I don't know about that stone pictured above, but there are a lot of archeological anomalies that upset scientists.

If I may, I'd like to suggest this book.

The Hidden History of the Human Race.

Over the past two hundred years the scientific establishment has selectively ignored, suppressed, and forgotten some remarkable artifacts and bones that contradict the dominant views of human origins and antiquity. Evolutionary prejudices have served as a sort of informational "filtering" system that has left us with a radically incomplete set of facts for building our ideas about human origins. The Hidden History Of The Human Race is a call for change in today's arbitrarily rigid mindset. Deploying an unexpectedly great number of convincing facts, deeply illuminated with critical analysis, readers will find themselves compelled to rethink our understanding of human origins, identity, and destiny. The Hidden History Of The Human Race proves a literary excavation of a vast store of heretofore hidden knowledge in a journey that takes us across five continents to key archeological sites (some long forgotten, others the center of ongoing research). The Hidden History Of The Human Race is bound to ignite controversy, challenging as it does one of the most fundamental components of the modern scientific world view. meticulously researched and carefully written, The Hidden History Of The Human Race takes us to a crossroads of knowledge and invites us to take a courageous first step in a new direction. Controversial, thought provoking, and exceptionally well presented, Cremo and Thompson are to be congratulated with this astonishing contribution to anthropology and the theory of human evolution.

--Midwest Book Review

288 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:03:47pm

excellant

289 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:04:02pm

re: #279 Occasional Reader

During your times of trial and suffering, when you see only one set of footprints, it was then that the dinosaur carried you.

Cease your blasphemy, fool.

290 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:04:13pm

re: #272 Racer X

What if people wanted so much to believe in their faith, that they faked something to try and prove it?

14th Century Europe was full of it.

291 reine.de.tout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:04:14pm

re: #236 Hhar

This print is illustrated in more detail here:

[Link: www.creationevidence.org...]

particularly amusing is the utterly useless "CT scan". Normally, a high resolution CT scan might be invaluable for looking at deformation patterns in the sediment, but the example provided is risable.

What are they trying to show with the CT scan? I can't tell anything from it

292 picaro  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:04:23pm

Come on, the rebuttal link is to a newsgroup archive that makes allegations without citing specific documents, persons, or publications? Newsgroups were the 'blogs of the 90's.

293 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:04:44pm

re: #237 Ben Hur

What if it's real?

If it's real.
Quantum physics is wrong.
Physics is wrong.
Geology is wrong.
Biology is wrong.
Chemistry is wrong.
The fundamental building building blocks of science would have to be wrong for that rock to be correct.

What you gonna' believe. Centuries of painstaking science by hundreds of thousands of people. Or a rock discovered by an amateur, removed from it's location and in the custody of the Creation Museum?

294 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:05:35pm
295 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:05:50pm

re: #264 Ben Hur

Maybe the dragon tales that are found in cultures that would have never interacted were the stories of the last dinosaurs.

Onr would like to think so - but then, there should be genes in the now living chicks and birds indicating that they could breathe fire - and there ain't any.
On the other hand, every dragon (well, most ...) in the folk tales breathe fire ...
(Our Welsh one does!)

296 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:05:55pm

I don't think it's proof that man and dinosaurs roamed together.

I do think it's proof of Sasquatch, though. Because the truth is out there!

297 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:13pm

re: #262 Sharmuta

And what if monkeys fly out of my butt?

You're a little behind the times, Sharm. It's "evil space monkeys" now. Regular monkeys flying out of your butt just wont have the same impact now-a-days.
//our society has become so jaded

298 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:23pm

re: #293 jcm

If it's real.
Quantum physics is wrong.
Physics is wrong.
Geology is wrong.
Biology is wrong.
Chemistry is wrong.
The fundamental building building blocks of science would have to be wrong for that rock to be correct.

What you gonna' believe. Centuries of painstaking science by hundreds of thousands of people. Or a rock discovered by an amateur, removed from it's location and in the custody of the Creation Museum?

I don't see how you could cite any of those sciences as being wrong under Ben Hur's scenario., sorry.

299 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:24pm

re: #289 Peacekeeper

Cease your blasphemy, fool.

Bullshit, Jesus, Those Are Obviously My Footprints

300 MJBrutus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:31pm

I love the Flintstones as much as the next guy, but leave Hanna-Barbara out of the classroom.

Yabba-Dabba-Doo!

301 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:31pm

re: #287 NoSubmission

I'll stick with Tolkien, thank you.

302 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:32pm

re: #293 jcm

If it's real.
Quantum physics is wrong.
Physics is wrong.
Geology is wrong.
Biology is wrong.
Chemistry is wrong.
The fundamental building building blocks of science would have to be wrong for that rock to be correct.

What you gonna' believe. Centuries of painstaking science by hundreds of thousands of people. Or a rock discovered by an amateur, removed from it's location and in the custody of the Creation Museum?

Why would all those fields be wrong?

303 Rancher  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:36pm
A domestic fall from a ladder eight months ago nearly crippled Delk, resulting in surgeries, a long recovery and expensive medical bills. He decided to try and sell some of his archeological treasurers, so he turned to the large piece of limestone, thinking he could clean it up some and sell it to the Creation Evidence Museum

And then found the human print? Shenanigans!

304 Excaliber  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:36pm

Oh come now people ! Can't you hear the BULLSHIT DETECTORS going off all over the place ?

305 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:06:59pm
306 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:07:22pm

re: #295 yma o hyd

Onr would like to think so - but then, there should be genes in the now living chicks and birds indicating that they could breathe fire - and there ain't any.
On the other hand, every dragon (well, most ...) in the folk tales breathe fire ...
(Our Welsh one does!)

That could have been relish to make the story more exciting.

307 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:07:44pm

re: #282 geata

Scientists spend a great deal of their time imagining ways to prove a given theory wrong. Then they design an experiment to test it, to see if they can prove it wrong. If the theory is proven wrong, they update it to include new evidence. That's how science works.

The problem with this rock is they won't allow any legitimate scientist to examine it. Why not? Because it's a fake and would easily be proven as such.

308 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:08:07pm

re: #304 Excaliber
YES!
But then again ,I work for the evil GOVT......
So it's just white noise to me!

309 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:08:23pm

re: #264 Ben Hur

Maybe the dragon tales that are found in cultures that would have never interacted were the stories of the last dinosaurs.

It's not outside the realm of possiblity. From another article on the website, regarding the "sea monster" caught by Japanese fishermen in 1977:

However, even if a modern plesiosaur were confirmed, it would not threaten the concept of evolution. After all, many other modern animal groups existed during the Mesozoic Era, such as crocodiles, lizards, snakes, and various fish. Most of these groups are well represented in the fossil record leading to the present time, but some creatures, such as the Coelacanth and Tautara were once thought to have been extinct for tens of millions of years, only to be later found alive and little changed in modern times. These cases emphasize the incompleteness of the fossil record and the remarkable stasis of some animal groups, but are not grounds for upheavals in evolutionary thought.

310 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:08:30pm

I don't think it's real.

Just thought I'd toss it out there.

Though monkeys may being living in her ass.

311 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:08:34pm

re: #299 Occasional Reader

Heh. One of us is in for a big surpries one day.

312 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:08:52pm

re: #297 Slumbering Behemoth

I was not aware of the evil space monkeys. I blame George Bush.

313 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:08:57pm

re: #283 Ben Hur

Thass an Australian painting, that is - and not of a dragon, iirc!

(Nice try!)

314 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:05pm

This thing is designed to make some people say "impossible," thereby "proving" that anyone who thinks evolutionary theory is more than a theory is just as dogmatic and fideistic as a creationist.

To which one can only reply, "rubbish."

315 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:14pm

re: #305 buzzsawmonkey

The dragons might have just had really bad breath, you know. Bad enough even to make an impression in those days of low personal hygiene.

Fire-breathing dragons. Methane.
Robert Heinlein used it in "Glory Road".

316 Cap'n DOC  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:23pm

re: #266 RickZ

You rock.

317 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:29pm

re: #264 Ben Hur

Maybe the dragon tales that are found in cultures that would have never interacted were the stories of the last dinosaurs.

And maybe The Wizard of Oz is based on real accounts of the monkeys flying out of my butt.

318 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:38pm

re: #310 Ben Hur

Rotten Socratic method....

319 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:39pm

re: #309 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

WTF is THIS?

320 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:47pm

re: #264 Ben Hur

Maybe the dragon tales that are found in cultures that would have never interacted were the stories of the last dinosaurs.

I've come to view those tales not so much as legends, but prophecies warning of my ex's time stalking the earth.

321 kulhwch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:09:52pm
A domestic fall from a ladder eight months ago nearly crippled Delk, resulting in surgeries, a long recovery and expensive medical bills. He decided to try and sell some of his archeological treasurers, so he turned to the large piece of limestone, thinking he could clean it up some and sell it to the Creation Evidence Museum located adjacent to Dinosaur Valley State Park near Glen Rose.

Well, well ... now this could explain a lot:

On Nov 29, 2007 10:17 PM, Susan Delk wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please keep the Delk family in your thoughts and
> prayers in the next few days. Alvis Delk, Lady
> Caristiona's dad and my father in law, fell today
> from an attic to a concrete driveway while
> working. He was taken by Care Flight to JPS
> Hospital in Fort Worth. From what little we know,
> he is in the ICU with bleeding on the brain and a
> broken back. He is in and out of consciousness
> and recognizes Kristi and his girlfriend, Elizabeth.
> We don't know if there is a spinal injury or
> whether he will need any type of surgery. We
> know very little right now but please keep us in
> your thoughts and prayers in the next few days.
> Kevin and I will be going to Fort Worth in the
> morning, and Kristi is already there. Thank you all.

... and (same source) ...

First of all, thanks to all of you who sent thoughts and prayers our way. I am a believer in the power of prayer, and I think it helped. Mr. Delk is out of ICU and is now in PCU(progressive care). He does not have a skull fracture and the fractures in his back are not impinging on the spinal cord. He can move all extremities. He is having problems with short term memory, but he can identify family members and sometimes can remember what happened. Mostly he's just in a lot of pain, which is to be expected when you fall 8 feet onto a concrete driveway. We don't know what the future will hold, how long he'll be in the hospital, or anything like that. They are most concerned about the head injury, but so far the bleeding and swelling has not worsened and may be slightly improving. Thanks again for all of your good wishes. It has helped and we do appreciate it all.
Genevieve, Caristiona and The Delk Family

Sounds to me like Mr. Delk got lucky twice, first in surviving the fall and secondly in 'finding' this fossil.  And if he sells it, pays off his medical bills, and then later it's discovered to be a fraud, he can always claim amnesia.

}:)     [Yes, indeed, truly blessed is he ... ]

322 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:10:20pm

re: #313 yma o hyd

Thass an Australian painting, that is - and not of a dragon, iirc!

(Nice try!)


How 'bout this one?
[Link: www.genesispark.com...]

323 Rancher  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:10:35pm

Reminds me of that head in England that caused such a commotion.

324 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:10:38pm

re: #287 NoSubmission

I actually own that book! Haven't read much of it - it's friggin' huge & Fortean phenomena doesn't interest me as much as it used to.

325 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:11:19pm

re: #317 Occasional Reader

And maybe The Wizard of Oz is based on real accounts of the monkeys flying out of my butt.

I though they flew out of the Witches butt.

326 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:11:34pm
327 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:12:02pm

re: #311 Peacekeeper

Heh. One of us is in for a big surpries one day.

BIG SUPRIES IS RIPPING US OFF!

328 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:12:42pm

re: #319 Ben Hur

A taxidermist with a marvelous sense of mischief.

329 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:12:52pm

re: #319 Ben Hur

It looks like a Photoshop fake. Look how much sharper (no pun intended) the beak is in comparison to the rest of the thing.

330 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:13:12pm

re: #319 Ben Hur

331 Pullus Iulius  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:13:18pm

So is this the ancient origin of that "Footprints in the Sand" story?

332 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:13:23pm

Gotta go see a man about a dinosaur.

333 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:13:52pm

Dragons are dinosaurs- KalvinB told me so.

334 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:13:58pm

re: #305 buzzsawmonkey

The dragons might have just had really bad breath, you know. Bad enough even to make an impression in those days of low personal hygiene.

That might conceivably be true of all those other dragons - but certainly not for our Welsh one.

And he's red!

335 MJBrutus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:14:01pm

re: #302 Ben Hur

They would be wrong because all of our techniques based on physics for dating rocks and fossils would be proven spectacularly wrong. Everything we know about geology would be wrong, because most of our knowledge comes from what would be an badly flawed understanding of geological processes. Everything we know about the formation of the earth and plate tectonics would be proven just as wrong. Everything we know about biology would obviously have to be scrapped as would all of biological chemistry since it all is based on the ToE.

336 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:14:19pm
337 Clemente  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:14:39pm
Baugh ... said he is so confident in the authenticity of the specimen he is ready to put his reputation entirely on the line.

/punchline

338 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:14:44pm

re: #333 Sharmuta

Dragons are dinosaurs- KalvinB told me so.

That contains a few ... slivers of truth.

339 lawhawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:15:04pm

re: #336 buzzsawmonkey

Escape from Plum Island.... /cue scary music.

340 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:15:36pm

re: #319 Ben Hur
That's it!
It's a WTF!

341 saberry0530  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:15:37pm

re: #336 buzzsawmonkey

Either a giant naked mole rat or one of the pygmy re-animated corpse slaves from Phantasm.

I was thinking more of a zombie eagle dog child...

342 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:15:39pm
343 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:15:42pm

re: #298 Capitalist Tool

I don't see how you could cite any of those sciences as being wrong under Ben Hur's scenario., sorry.

re: #302 Ben Hur

Why would all those fields be wrong?

Radio Isotope data is based on quantum physics. Decay rates are fundamental to the equations, you'd have to rewrite quantum physics to accommodate revising decay rates. However decay rates are only on part of quantum, element properties are also calculable with in the quantum equations, you can't revised the decay portion of the equation with out revising the properties portion. It's all link to the quantum properties and behaviors.

All down the list fundamental discoveries that tell us how things work would be wrong, if that rock is correct.

344 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:15:50pm

re: #329 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

It looks like a Photoshop fake. Look how much sharper (no pun intended) the beak is in comparison to the rest of the thing.

Deny all you want, God-hater. This drawing was found in a cave in Australia, and has been dated back approximately 5,000 years.

345 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:16:44pm
346 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:16:54pm

re: #341 saberry0530

I was thinking more of a zombie eagle dog child...

I thought it was an eagle child zombie dog...

347 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:17:08pm

re: #342 buzzsawmonkey

What is scary about a plum? Aside from eating entire bags of dried ones the day before a hot date?

348 badger1970  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:17:32pm

Yes, that looks as 'bout as real as a three dollar bill and I fail to understand what these hoaxers are trying to accomplish with such bad "evidence". Dino preceded man by millions of years- there's no disputing that, but does it call for bashing people that may believe that man may be younger than we think we are?

Evolution theory works great as long as humans aren't thrown into the equation because there hasn't been evidence showing links from ape-like to human-like to human. If we are nothing more than an event in the evolutionary process why should we even bother trying to better ourselves following a belief system and hoping for the best after we breathe our last?

I don't take everything in the Bible literally and frankly it took billions of years for the creation of earth and it's ecosystem, fault me if you will but I fail to see what is wrong to believe that man is as old as a the number of "begats" (give or take a few).

349 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:17:55pm

re: #344 Occasional Reader

Deny all you want, God-hater. This drawing was found in a cave in Australia, and has been dated back approximately 5,000 years.

That just makes me question my belief in God!

350 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:18:30pm

re: #322 Ben Hur

How 'bout this one?
[Link: www.genesispark.com...]

No self-respecting prehistoric artist would have drawn such pitiful thing!
(The faker should've looked at some cave paintings before he tried to commit this hoax!)

351 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:18:42pm
352 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:18:49pm

re: #349 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

That just makes me question my belief in God!

Barney is God?

353 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:18:57pm

The Pickled Dragon Hoax.

I dunno, looks real to me.
/

354 straitcircle  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:19:17pm

Yeah, we evolved out of monkeys or chimps and the ones still here today were all left behind by us. OK I see that logic. Did Darwin experiment with psychedelic plants when he was doing his vacation on some of those islands? Now where did the chimp come from? The butterfly or the mosquito? It surely wasn't the platypus!

355 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:19:24pm
356 alegrias  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:19:31pm

Speaking of antiquity,

Iraq is the birthplace of beer!

Won't it be cool to visit Iraq's museums full of antiquities such as the Hammurabi Code written on tablets of some sort, with styles?

Iraqis' billions in oil revenues ought to clean up the country fast, so we can museum visit some day soon.

Thanks, President Bush and troops who made this Mesopotamiam renaissance happen.

Thanks US taxpayer for footing the bill. (May we get our investment back in peace & cheaper gas worldwide).

357 saberry0530  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:19:32pm

re: #344 Occasional Reader

Deny all you want, God-hater. This drawing was found in a cave in Australia, and has been dated back approximately 5,000 years.

Finally! A link that i actually agree with that gets blocked by the Barracuda Firewall.

358 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:19:33pm

re: #348 badger1970

what these hoaxers are trying to accomplish

It might be simply to sell tickets to the Museum.

359 Andopolis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:19:49pm

Dremelshopped!

360 mean Gene  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:20:39pm

If most Americans take off their shoes and look at their toes the effect of a lifetime in shoes built on staves forces our toes towards the center.
It is pretty rare for a modern persons toes to align in a never-shod manner like the toes in that piece of rock.
I'm not saying it can't have been faked....God knows hundreds of fossils proving this-or-that turned out to be fakes.....but I'm just saying.

Dr. Carl Baugh is the founder and director of the Creation Evidence Museum and claims doctorates in theology and philosophy in education as well as a master’s degree in archeology.
'' The compression lines, the density features, do show, and there is no way to fake that,'' he says.

Well, I'd like to see someone more neutral about the Creation take a look and give a 2nd opinion.
I also think it odd that the footprints were right where the Creationists claimed they would be.

361 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:21:01pm

re: #351 buzzsawmonkey

That covers every single man and woman past thirty who looks into the bathroom mirror in the morning.

ME ME ME ME ME ME ...

... uh ...

... never mind

362 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:21:12pm

Evolution is like saying the monkey flew out of its' own ass.

363 badger1970  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:21:16pm

re: #351 buzzsawmonkey

That covers every single man and woman past thirty who looks into the bathroom mirror in the morning.

Good one.

364 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:21:18pm

re: #353 Slumbering Behemoth

The Pickled Dragon Hoax.

I dunno, looks real to me.
/

Mmmmm pickled dragon, pretzels and beer!

365 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:21:27pm

re: #343 jcm

Radio Isotope data is based on quantum physics. Decay rates are fundamental to the equations, you'd have to rewrite quantum physics to accommodate revising decay rates. However decay rates are only on part of quantum, element properties are also calculable with in the quantum equations, you can't revised the decay portion of the equation with out revising the properties portion. It's all link to the quantum properties and behaviors.

All down the list fundamental discoveries that tell us how things work would be wrong, if that rock is correct.

Still don't see it... at worst, being real would merely point out misconceptions about ancient times, not any refutation of our understanding of radio isotopes or chemical properties.

366 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:22:15pm

re: #353 Slumbering Behemoth

Beautiful. Those C19 chaps produced some excellent stuff.

By the way, that dragon could never fly. Wings are too small.

368 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:22:28pm

re: #353 Slumbering Behemoth

The Pickled Dragon Hoax.

I dunno, looks real to me.
/

A German fake, a very good one - those Germans are sticklers for meticulousness.
Probably Prussian (the fake, that is!)

369 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:22:31pm

re: #353 Slumbering Behemoth

The Pickled Dragon Hoax.

I dunno, looks real to me.
/

Can we name it Norbert?

370 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:23:22pm

re: #353 Slumbering Behemoth

The Pickled Dragon Hoax.

I dunno, looks real to me.
/

Now THAT is interesting!

371 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:23:28pm

re: #347 godfrey

What is scary about a plum?

NO NO NO

It's "Do I dare to eat a peach?"

PK was right, you guys don't know poetry for s**t!

372 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:23:41pm
373 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:23:41pm

re: #310 Ben Hur

The big conceptual problem ID has is they have to assume G-d created the world to look like it was 5 billion years old and full of fossils of creatures that look like the evolved through natural selection even though it was created much more recently and under a guiding Hand. Why would G-d go to all that trouble? Why create a Universe that looks like it's 13.5 billion years old if it isn't?

Rocks like this fake expose that contradiction in ID.

374 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:23:51pm

I think the Montauck Monster is ManBearPig!

375 badger1970  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:23:54pm

re: #369 Sharmuta

Can we name it Norbert?

Only if you give "She-who-must-not-be-named" her royality check.

376 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:24:16pm

re: #369 Sharmuta

Pickled dragon hoax revealed

Yeah, they would say that, wouldn't they.

377 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:24:26pm

re: #1 buzzsawmonkey

Speaking of evolution...

In one of the most significant legal rulings in the tech industry this year, a Superior Court judge in California has ruled that the practice of charging consumers a fee for ending their cell phone contract early is illegal and violates state law.

The preliminary, tentative judgment orders Sprint Nextel to pay customers $18.2 million in reimbursements and, more importantly, orders Sprint to stop trying to collect another $54.7 million from California customers (some 2 million customers total) who have canceled their contracts but refused or failed to pay the termination fee.

378 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:24:44pm
379 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:24:55pm

re: #373 Kenneth

The big conceptual problem ID has is they have to assume G-d created the world to look like it was 5 billion years old and full of fossils of creatures that look like the evolved through natural selection even though it was created much more recently and under a guiding Hand. Why would G-d go to all that trouble? Why create a Universe that looks like it's 13.5 billion years old if it isn't?

Rocks like this fake expose that contradiction in ID.

It's just a test to determine the truly worthy...

380 lawhawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:25:19pm

Plum Island - a US research facility off the coast of LI, reachable only by authorized personnel via ferry from Orient Point, that specializes in infectious disease research of animals.

381 looking closely  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:25:25pm

re: #282 geata

Why can nobody answer BH's question? I too am curious. Let's pretend someone really did find a fossil that showed a dinosaur stepping over a human footprint. What would this mean? I don't see why people seem incapable of even imagining that their previous scientific ideas could possibly be proven to be in error in any way.

Lets say someone actually found a photograph depicting a space alien shaking hands with the President of the USA.
Would that prove extraterrestrial life exists?

The point is, this is a question of the "What if my Grandmother had wings" variety. Come up with the evidence and then we'll see what it means.

Remember, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

382 snowcrash  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:25:57pm

re: #359 Andopolis

Dremelshopped!


Best laugh all day!

383 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:26:07pm

re: #375 badger1970

Only if you give "She-who-must-not-be-named" her royality check.

Does she accept leprechaun gold?

384 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:26:29pm

re: #372 buzzsawmonkey

Stop it!

385 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:26:52pm

re: #371 Occasional Reader

'So careful of the type?' but no.
From scarped cliff and quarried stone
She cries 'A thousand types are gone:
I care for nothing, all shall go.

386 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:26:53pm
387 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:28:14pm

Netanyahu calls for early Israeli elections

Form your lips to G-d's ears, Bibi...

388 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:28:29pm

re: #335 MJBrutus

They would be wrong because all of our techniques based on physics for dating rocks and fossils would be proven spectacularly wrong. Everything we know about geology would be wrong, because most of our knowledge comes from what would be an badly flawed understanding of geological processes. Everything we know about the formation of the earth and plate tectonics would be proven just as wrong. Everything we know about biology would obviously have to be scrapped as would all of biological chemistry since it all is based on the ToE.


Thanks.

389 straitcircle  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:28:34pm

re: #362 Peacekeeper

Evolution is like saying the monkey flew out of its' own ass.


I want to start a World University with that quote as a Motto!

390 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:28:46pm

re: #319 Ben Hur


WTF is THIS?

The suggestions I have seen so far include a turtle, sans shell, or a large dog, probably a short nose breed like a pit bull, that has significant sections of it's snout missing, and the bone structure resembles a beak as a result. It washed up, so presumably the time spent in the water could have done something to exfoliate the carcass. I'm going with the dog explanation, that one seems the most likely.

391 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:28:50pm

re: #387 Kenneth

Netanyahu calls for early Israeli elections

Form your lips to G-d's ears, Bibi...

And totally dependent on Olmert and his successor.

392 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:29:11pm

re: #32 Ben Hur

More likely, THIS or THIS.

Please tell me you didn't have those bookmarked, LOL.

393 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:29:26pm

re: #367 A Kiwi Infidel

Completely OT but this case of a man being stabbed and having his head cut off while on a bus in Canada does raise the question, SJS?

Probably not, based upon what I read earlier today.

An Anglo passenger (saw him in a video) described the perp as 6' tall, 200 lbs, bald headed and wearing sunglasses. No mention of complexion or ethnicity, which, IMHO, would indicate the passenger thought the perp was Anglo (like himself).

While it's possible that an Anglo Muslim might ... et cetera.

394 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:29:27pm

re: #381 looking closely

What about the Aztec carvings of little men from the sky with helmets on?

395 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:30:18pm

re: #372 buzzsawmonkey
gah!

396 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:30:34pm
397 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:30:35pm

re: #35 Yishai

The man-toes are way too well-defined. It is not a footprint made while walking. It looks very fake.

I agree.

The toe marks should be shmooshed.

398 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:30:39pm

The perfect museum for the piece featured in the OP.

399 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:30:42pm

re: #394 Ben Hur

What about the Aztec carvings of little men from the sky with helmets on?

Visions of jockeys?

400 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:30:46pm

re: #394 Ben Hur

What about the Aztec carvings of little men from the sky with helmets on?

They had some potent stuff to smoke, those Azteks ....

401 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:31:04pm

re: #343 jcm


Thanks.

402 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:31:47pm

re: #274 Iron Fist

When Obama is President god, it will be all green lights, in all directions, all the time.

Including up and down.

403 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:31:56pm

re: #398 Slumbering Behemoth

The perfect museum for the piece featured in the OP.

Ah - but would they pay as much as that Creationist Museum?

404 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:32:01pm

re: #397 Josephine

I agree.

The toe marks should be shmooshed.

I agree.

See my #32.

405 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:32:41pm

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

406 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:32:44pm

re: #394 Ben Hur

What about the Aztec carvings of little men from the sky with helmets on?

Peyote.

407 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:32:55pm

re: #402 Cygnus

Including up and down.

An "Obamavator?" Like the "Wonkavator?"

408 Peacekeeper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:33:11pm

I've heard it said that Barrack Obama has a middle name, but nobody has any proof and the surely the media would have reported it if he did.

409 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:33:35pm

re: #407 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

An "Obamavator?" Like the "Wonkavator?"

Well, he does move sideways a lot.

410 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:33:46pm

re: #279 Occasional Reader

During your times of trial and suffering, when you see only one set of footprints, it was then that the dinosaur carried you.

I thought that was after the dinosaur ate you.

411 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:34:02pm

At least the fakers had a sense of drama: the dino print came soon after the human print, possibly suggesting pursuit. I totally approve.

412 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:34:04pm

re: #380 lawhawk

Plum Island - a US research facility off the coast of LI, reachable only by authorized personnel via ferry from Orient Point, that specializes in infectious disease research of animals.

Where they offered to transfer Lecter?

413 looking closely  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:34:13pm

re: #390 CyanSnowHawk

The suggestions I have seen so far include a turtle, sans shell, or a large dog, probably a short nose breed like a pit bull, that has significant sections of it's snout missing, and the bone structure resembles a beak as a result. It washed up, so presumably the time spent in the water could have done something to exfoliate the carcass. I'm going with the dog explanation, that one seems the most likely.

I agree, and would hasten to add that the proper examinations (eg necropsy by a vet, let alone DNA testing) could probably prove definitively what it is.

But you know, people just love weird s@#$.

A whacko pseudo-demon or even a deliberate forgery is just so much more interesting than a rotten dog carcass.

So its almost a shame to prove these things are fake. Kind of takes the fun out of them.

414 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:34:34pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

Problem is, the Creation Museum will not allow for independent scientific study of the rock. Combine that with the other inconsistencies found within the rock, I, as well as others, suspect that it is fake. The Creation Museum's track record preceedes them here.

415 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:34:39pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

Well, that and the occasional troll.

416 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:35:09pm

re: #365 Capitalist Tool

Still don't see it... at worst, being real would merely point out misconceptions about ancient times, not any refutation of our understanding of radio isotopes or chemical properties.

How your computer display generates it's image is based on quantum physics. I use the equations to determine the strength of the electrical field to steer the electron beam with magnets to put a a black pixel here .
at that period. Part and parcel to those equations are decay rates, they are not separate equations, they integral to the whole thing. If those portions of the equations are wrong then whole thing is wrong, and that black pixel would be someplace else.

417 looking closely  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:35:09pm

re: #400 yma o hyd

They had some potent stuff to smoke, those Azteks ....

They liked mushrooms, actually.

418 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:35:55pm

re: #379 Capitalist Tool

It's just a test to determine the truly worthy...

So God would place false, untrue things in His creation?

419 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:36:02pm

re: #413 looking closely

I agree, and would hasten to add that the proper examinations (eg necropsy by a vet, let alone DNA testing) could probably prove definitively what it is.

But you know, people just love weird s@#$.

A whacko pseudo-demon or even a deliberate forgery is just so much more interesting than a rotten dog carcass.

So its almost a shame to prove these things are fake. Kind of takes the fun out of them.

I can hardly convey how creeped out that photo makes me feel.

420 looking closely  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:36:23pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.


Wrong.

A "real" scientist is skeptical and accepts the "null" hypothesis (that something that smells like an obvious fake actually is one) until good evidence emerges to prove the contrary.

421 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:36:57pm
422 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:37:38pm

re: #404 Ben Hur

I agree.

See my #32.

You did.

My bad.

423 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:37:49pm

re: #414 Honorary Yooper

Do you recall the osiery some "archeologist" was claimed once held the bones of Jesus? When scientists finally got a chance to examine it they discovered the carved writing on the exterior was only a few years old -certain chemical reactions happen to limestone exposed to an air surface. If the carving was done 2000 years ago, different chemicals would have been found. It was proven a forgery.

424 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:37:51pm

All I can say is that if humans existed with dinosaurs, why didn't the dinos do cave drawings of men?

425 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:38:08pm

re: #405 jimc

Perhaps you should read #17. Anyone who wanted to prove this was genuine should not have removed it from the site. It's no different than tampering with evidence at a murder scene.

426 yma o hyd  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:38:12pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

Ahem.
Why is one not allowed to use one's common sense - and perhaps experience of looking at tracks - to debate this?
Are only geologists and palaeontologists allowed an opinion, but not us normal people who may ahve an interest, may have read about things, may even have seen things like fossilised dionsaur prints on beaches?

Next, we'll be told to leave all those really difficult decisions, like whom to vote for, to some board of experts and not trouble our little minds with anything ...

427 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:38:20pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

Read the following linked comment, posted earlier in the thread.

re: #293 jcm

428 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:38:50pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

The sample was removed without an in situ study.
The sample was not submitted for any paleontological studies.
The sample is custody of an institution with a questionable scientific credentials.

429 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:38:51pm

re: #405 jimc

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

Let's not leave out the hacks that will immediately call it authentic without further observation. Or the hacks that will likely say "It's real, no you can't test it for yourselves, just trust us".

430 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:39:23pm

re: #319 Ben Hur


WTF is THIS?

It's a Jenny Craig 'before' photo.

431 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:39:55pm

re: #418 jcm

So God would place false, untrue things in His creation?

someone actually told me that once... explaining to me the whole 6,000 yr thing.

432 looking closely  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:40:10pm

re: #419 CyanSnowHawk

I can hardly convey how creeped out that photo makes me feel.


And it probably doesn't smell too good either if you were standing next to it.

I suspect that three or four other photographs from different angles would create a whole other impression of what it is.

But again, the whole joy of these sorts of things is being intrigued by the possibility of what it *might* be (instead of the depressing reality of what it actually is).

Actually doing the alien autopsy to prove its just a mutilated dog is sort of like telling a kid there is no Santa Claus.

433 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:40:20pm

re: #424 opnion

why didn't the dinos do cave drawings of men?

Because the Neanderthal Endowment for the Arts would've sued their asses for discrimination.

434 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:40:23pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

And therein lies the problem: the people who own this rock won't let real scientists examine it. I call bullshit until proven otherwise.

435 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:40:29pm

re: #415 CyanSnowHawk
Who is the troll? I haven't read all 400+ comments but I'll take your word that some trolls are here.

436 Iron Fist  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:40:32pm

re: #336 buzzsawmonkey

...giant naked mole rat...


James Carville?

437 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:40:35pm

Ah GEEEZ!
Now we got crop circles in Minn....
Talk about a hoax!
MSNBC`

438 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:41:18pm

re: #423 Kenneth

Do you recall the osiery some "archeologist" was claimed once held the bones of Jesus? When scientists finally got a chance to examine it they discovered the carved writing on the exterior was only a few years old -certain chemical reactions happen to limestone exposed to an air surface. If the carving was done 2000 years ago, different chemicals would have been found. It was proven a forgery.

Jesus wore hosiery?

439 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:42:11pm

re: #435 jimc

Who is the troll? I haven't read all 400+ comments but I'll take your word that some trolls are here.

Yeah- sometimes they're hard to spot. Especially if there are no mirrors nearby.

440 USASupport  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:42:19pm

re: #3 zombie

What would it take to convince you it's real? What kind of tests?

441 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:42:36pm

re: #433 godfrey

Because the Neanderthal Endowment for the Arts would've sued their asses for discrimination.

Why didn't I think of that? I see how sensitrive the Geico guys are.

442 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:42:41pm

OH boy! He doesn't get it.

443 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:43:33pm

re: #319 Ben Hur


WTF is THIS?

It's a sea turtle without it's shell. Note the beak, tail the feet with webs & claws. Turtle.

444 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:44:37pm

re: #443 Kenneth

It's a sea turtle without it's shell. Note the beak, tail the feet with webs & claws. Turtle.

Thats what I think. Look closely at the head.

445 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:45:41pm

re: #439 Sharmuta

LOL. Nice spike Sharm.

446 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:45:57pm

re: #440 USASupport

What would it take to convince you it's real? What kind of tests?

I would like to see chemical tests of the surfaces of the rock inside the footprints & outside. Rocks undergo chemical reactions over time when exposed to air. I would also examine the footprint for traces of abrasives used to carve it.

447 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:46:12pm

re: #443 Kenneth

Ingeniously observed.

448 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:46:16pm
449 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:46:23pm

re: #354 straitcircle

Yeah, we evolved out of monkeys or chimps and the ones still here today were all left behind by us. OK I see that logic. Did Darwin experiment with psychedelic plants when he was doing his vacation on some of those islands? Now where did the chimp come from? The butterfly or the mosquito? It surely wasn't the platypus!

This whole comment is wrong. We didn't evolve from monkeys- we evolved from a common ancestor. Please do some homework or risk continuing to look woefully uninformed.

450 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:46:31pm
451 Basho  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:46:58pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

Here's the deal with science: There will never be a new discovery that will show what we know about biology and/or geology and/or physics and/or every other branch of science to be wrong. Every new unique, extraordinary discovery MUST be consistent with all the previous scientific evidence. It must explain all of the other accumulated data equally well. That's why no real scientist will ever take seriously a "discovery" on a perpetual motion machine, or a footprint of a human with a dinosaur.

452 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:47:03pm

re: #431 Capitalist Tool

someone actually told me that once... explaining to me the whole 6,000 yr thing.

I don't believe the God I know in His Word would do that.
I am left to be what can be determined true in creation is true.

We can make mistakes and do in determined this truth, but we also make mistakes in understanding His Word. From a purely logic construction, the evidence for an ancient world in both His Word, and His creation out weighs for a young.

453 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:47:17pm

re: #420 looking closely

Wow reading comprehension. I said "rejecting". Being skeptical is fine, however rejecting outright is not being skeptical, it is being dogmatic. See the difference? I'm not arguing this is real or fake, just taking the appropriate stance of not dismissing a data point before it is even studied by the skeptical. You can have your opinion that it is fake, but opinions are scientific facts....

The point that access to the specimen is limited is a problem but that also does not mean it must be rejected, just doesn't count until it is examined more thoroughly and by several independent parties (impartiality would be next to impossible though).

454 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:47:27pm

re: #444 opnion

And the teeth? Please explain the teeth.

455 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:47:55pm

re: #416 jcm

How your computer display generates it's image is based on quantum physics. I use the equations to determine the strength of the electrical field to steer the electron beam with magnets to put a a black pixel here .
at that period. Part and parcel to those equations are decay rates, they are not separate equations, they integral to the whole thing. If those portions of the equations are wrong then whole thing is wrong, and that black pixel would be someplace else.

My point is... not that I'm talking about validating that rock- finding out that we might be wrong about the origins of man and the timelines we've ascribed would mean that we are wrong about that one thing, not about all the rest... tectonic plates still shift, electron beams still get moved around by magnets.

We didn't throw out the theory of relativity because we recently discovered that evidence of man dates back around 16,000 years in North America rather than the 12,000 we'd previously thought.

No. I'm also not saying that I think the fossil is "real" as far as displaying an apparent contemporary human and big lizard print.

Could just as easily be a "give a monkey (nature) a typewriter (who knows what- hailstorm?) and sooner or later you get he types a sentence (random marks which resemble something like prints)

456 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:48:02pm

re: #443 Kenneth

It's a sea turtle without it's shell. Note the beak, tail the feet with webs & claws. Turtle.


Poor thing has an elbow.

457 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:48:04pm

re: #423 Kenneth

Do you recall the osiery some "archeologist" was claimed once held the bones of Jesus? When scientists finally got a chance to examine it they discovered the carved writing on the exterior was only a few years old -certain chemical reactions happen to limestone exposed to an air surface. If the carving was done 2000 years ago, different chemicals would have been found. It was proven a forgery.

It's spelled ossuary, and there are some who believe it is legitimate and the scientists doing the tests for the IAA are working outside of their specialties. Biblical Archeology Review has a longstanding article on their web site regarding all aspects of analysis: stone, writing, etc. The French expert (whose name I cannot remember) believes it is genuine.

458 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:48:24pm

re: #443 Kenneth

It's a sea turtle without it's shell. Note the beak, tail the feet with webs & claws. Turtle.

A Griffin without wings!
/

459 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:48:56pm

re: #453 jimc

Saying it "doesn't count" isn't rejection?

460 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:49:11pm

re: #450 buzzsawmonkey

Ok, thank you for the corrections . Now write a song about it...

You say Ossuary,
I say ossiery,
Let's call the whole thing off!
461 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:49:42pm

re: #450 buzzsawmonkey

"Ossuary."

By the way, wasn't that supposed to be the ossuary of James, the brother of Jesus, and so marked by the inscription?

Oh no, don't tell me there was a Jimmy Christ.

462 veeshir  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:49:43pm

Oh, so now the Thagomizer is a fake too?
Geez, what will it take to convince you people?

463 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:49:50pm

The human toes in the supposed "fossil" look like they were produced by the clone tool.

464 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:50:05pm

re: #450 buzzsawmonkey

"Ossuary."

By the way, wasn't that supposed to be the ossuary of James, the brother of Jesus, and so marked by the inscription?


Thats the way I recall it. I believe that it said son of joseph & Mary & brother of Jesus, or something like that.

465 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:50:27pm
466 USASupport  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:50:28pm

re: #446 Kenneth

So if it's proven to be genuine, what say you then?

467 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:50:31pm

re: #450 buzzsawmonkey

"Ossuary."

By the way, wasn't that supposed to be the ossuary of James, the brother of Jesus, and so marked by the inscription?

Yes, it was James, the brother of Jesus.

468 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:50:50pm

re: #452 jcm

I don't believe the God I know in His Word would do that.
I am left to be what can be determined true in creation is true.

We can make mistakes and do in determined this truth, but we also make mistakes in understanding His Word. From a purely logic construction, the evidence for an ancient world in both His Word, and His creation out weighs for a young.

Problem is with the ID people and a lot of others, is that they try to force God into the mold of their own mind. Not the other way around.

469 averagecdn  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:50:50pm

There is an easily logical explanation.

In 2017 Al Gore, despondent over the lack of pickup in environmental progress and the new 2017 112MPG Hummer H5, travels back in time using the latest iPhone of the period. His mission: stop pollution before it begins.

Unfortunately, underestimating his weight, the machine cannot compensate for the unexpected girth and throws him back in time too far.

This casting marks his unsuccessful attempt to convince a dinosaur that:
1. If they don't get buried after death, we won't have to deal with oil
2. Liberals aren't tasty.

470 debutaunt  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:51:05pm

re: #397 Josephine

I agree.

The toe marks should be shmooshed.

Dunno. Could be from a silly walk.

471 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:51:20pm

re: #412 Ben Hur

Where they offered to transfer Lecter?

I almost said the same thing. Thought too obscure. No way, you 'da man!

472 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:51:40pm

re: #463 godfrey

The human toes in the supposed "fossil" look like they were produced by the clone tool.

It's a cloned human? This justs gets weirder & weirder.
/

473 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:51:49pm

Science without peer review is still ok, just ask the Rillians.

474 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:52:22pm

re: #472 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

It's a cloned human? This justs gets weirder & weirder.
/

It's Bobba Fett!

475 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:52:42pm
Not only cunning casts in clay:
Let science prove we are, and then
What matters Science unto men,
At least to me? I would not stay.

Let him, the wiser man who springs
Hereafter, up from childhood shape
His action like the greater ape,
But I was born to other things.

Heavy drinking, for example.

Poor Tennyson, to have such a gift for melody, and yet waste it on this kind of posturing.

476 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:52:52pm

re: #454 godfrey

And the teeth? Please explain the teeth.

Great observation Dectective Godfrey. Your right, the thing has teeth.
That would suggest a canine, but the mouth is a beak. I'm stumped

477 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:53:07pm
478 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:53:12pm

Salon declares war on science and free speech...

What's wrong with science as religion


As a fellow scientist (I have a Ph.D. in physics), I share Myers' enthusiasm for fresh eyes, questioning minds and the power of science. And I worry about dogmatism and the kind of zealotry that motivates the faithful to blow themselves up, shoot abortion doctors and persecute homosexuals. But I also worry about narrow exclusiveness that champions the scientific way of knowing to the exclusion of all else. I don't like to see science turned into a club to bash religious believers.
....
When Salon interviewed me about my new book, "Saving Darwin," I suggested that science doesn't know everything, that there might be a reality beyond science, and that religion might be about God and not merely about the human quest for a nonexistent God.
479 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:54:02pm

re: #465 buzzsawmonkey

"French experts" also bought into the accuracy of the al-Dura tape.

Different field. Andre Lemaire, I believe.

480 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:54:02pm

re: #474 Sharmuta

It's Bobba Fett!

He would have killed the dinosaur.

481 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:54:17pm

re: #461 CyanSnowHawk

Oh no, don't tell me there was a Jimmy Christ.

LOL! Actually, it would been 'James, son of Joseph'.

482 jcm  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:54:28pm

re: #455 Capitalist Tool

My point is more macro. For YEC to be correct which is what the owners of the rock want to prove, a lot would be different.

It wouldn't be a change of a few thousand years, it would be millions. That changes a lot of things.

In micro, this could be a genuine footprint and lizard or bird print from the last 5 to 15 thousand years, and not change anything.

It cannot be a dinosaur and human without upsetting some fundamental scientific precepts.

/gotta go meeting.

483 Annar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:55:15pm

re: #408 Peacekeeper

I've heard it said that Barrack Obama has a middle name, but nobody has any proof and the surely the media would have reported it if he did.

It may have something to do with this guy.

484 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:55:16pm

re: #451 Basho
Oh, ok, so there have never been any discoveries that turned established scientific thought on its head? Hmmmm....ok

485 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:55:22pm

More on teh James ossuary:

[Link: www.bib-arch.org...]

486 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:55:52pm

re: #481 Cygnus

LOL! Actually, it would been 'James, son of Joseph'.

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

487 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:56:12pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

Jones?

488 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:56:24pm

re: #478 Killgore Trout

How is that article "declaring war on science and free speech," Killgore?

489 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:56:25pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

His middle initial was H. Does that help?

490 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:56:35pm

re: #459 Sharmuta

In the programming world, we call it "shelved". Not rejected, not accepted, just shelved.

491 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:56:37pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?


Joshua Ben Joseph.

492 tgibson1962  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:56:53pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

Bar-Joseph would be my guess. Christ is a title (Anointed One) not a last name.

493 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:56:57pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

Carpenter, I guess.

494 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:57:14pm

re: #489 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

His middle initial was H. Does that help?

maybe Hernandez- my waiter's name was Jesus, the other day.

495 twons  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:57:39pm

re: #466 USASupport

So if it's proven to be genuine, what say you then?

Prove it to be genuine, and we'll talk.

What if I could, like, fly using only my winged feet? What say you then?

496 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:57:42pm

Goldbergawitzensteinenbaum.

497 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:57:42pm

re: #487 Capitalist Tool

Jones?

No those were the cousins. John the Baptist Jones, yo know his mothers side

498 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:57:52pm

re: #484 jimcJimc, you're doing precisely what I describe in #314.

499 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:57:58pm

re: #440 USASupport

What would it take to convince you it's real? What kind of tests?

If I saw the rest of the trail of tracks of both creatures, in situ, still embedded in the rock formation, discovered by an independent third party, where their geological history could be ascertained, then that would go a long way toward convincing me.

But since no such additional tracks exist, that isn't likely to happen.

500 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:58:22pm

Ben Hur,

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

Joshua Ben Joseph.

Jesus' middle name was Ben?

501 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:58:58pm

re: #500 Dirk Diggler

Ben Hur,


Jesus' middle name was Ben?

Son of.

502 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:59:08pm

It's been fun & informative, as usual, but it's time to say good-night.

503 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:59:15pm

re: #493 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

I am left to conclude that ther was not a usage of last names at the time.Just your first name & a reference to where you are from

504 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:59:51pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

Were surnames commonly used in the area during that period? They didn't come into widespread use until fairly recently IIRC.

505 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 1:59:52pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

'Christ' is a title which means 'Anointed One' or 'Messiah'. He was probably called Jesus son of Joseph, since Joseph was His adoptive father (yes, I do believe that He was miraculously conceived).

506 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:00:16pm

re: #486 opnion

OK, seriously. Did Jesus have a last name? Anybody know?

His name was Yeshua ben Yoseph -- one's "last name" back then was simply "son of" (ben) [your father's name].

507 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:00:18pm

My bad.

It would be Jamal Ibn Yousef.

508 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:00:49pm

re: #500 Dirk Diggler

Ben, yes.

As in, "Jesus, you've been awol for, like, years. Where you ben?"

509 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:00:59pm

re: #439 Sharmuta

re: #425 Sharmuta

Perhaps you should read #17. Anyone who wanted to prove this was genuine should not have removed it from the site. It's no different than tampering with evidence at a murder scene.

Ok, so let's be absolutely legalistic about a potential discovery. Has there ever been fossils removed from their original site that were accepted as genuine? If so then this premise is false....

510 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:01:02pm

There's a whole movement of people out there who claim to have evidence oF Jesus' father being not Joseph or GOD, but a Roman soldier who had a tryst with Mary.
Really.

511 Basho  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:01:02pm

re: #484 jimc

Oh, ok, so there have never been any discoveries that turned established scientific thought on its head? Hmmmm....ok

That depends how you define "turned established scientific thought on its head". Einstein's relativity blew everyone away, but it still had to be consistent with Newton's laws to be taken seriously. Only in extreme circumstances near the speed of light does relativity give different answers.

512 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:01:06pm

re: #506 zombie

Why they stopped calling him Yeshua, I'll never understand. Love the sound of it.

513 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:01:10pm

Yehoshua

514 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:01:10pm
Ben Hur,


Jesus' middle name was Ben?

Son of.

I was joking. I know that "bin", "ibn", and the like represent "son of". I saw the 13th Warrior.

515 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:01:30pm

re: #404 Ben Hur

I agree.

See my #32.

I did. See my #392.

516 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:01:46pm

re: #504 CyanSnowHawk

Were surnames commonly used in the area during that period? They didn't come into widespread use until fairly recently IIRC.


I do believe that you are correct. Even in the 6th Century, like Mohammad of Hades

517 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:02:06pm

re: #512 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Why they stopped calling him Yeshua, I'll never understand. Love the sound of it.


Jesus is Yehoshua translated into Greek.

Jews call him "Yeshu" because letters that usually refer to G-d were taken out.

518 Thanos  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:02:08pm

Which is more pathetic and loathesome:

Con men who prey on people's religious beliefs to scam money and fame, or Con men who prey on people's political beliefs to scam money and fame, or con men who prey on people's social fears to scam money and fame?

Aren't all three types are all too easy to see coming a mile away?

519 little boomer  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:02:14pm

re: #505 Cygnus

'Christ' is a title which means 'Anointed One' or 'Messiah'. He was probably called Jesus son of Joseph, since Joseph was His adoptive father (yes, I do believe that He was miraculously conceived).

I thought it was Joshua Bar Joseph.

520 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:02:17pm

re: #478 Killgore Trout

Salon declares war on science and free speech...

I don't think so. I agree with Giberson's premise. This is exactly why people do feel threatened by science. I think trying to turn science into it's own religion is wrong on two fronts- one, it plays into the creationists' hands, and two- religion is a matter of faith whereas science requires evidence. I'd prefer not to see either camp confuse the two.

And I fail to see how this is Salon attacking free speech- they're offering a platform to further the discussion, are they not?

521 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:02:38pm

re: #517 Ben Hur

Gosh yer smart. Funny too.

522 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:02:47pm

re: #515 Josephine

I did. See my #392.


I know.

See my #404.

523 Annar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:02:55pm

I think Jesus's second name was 'Saves.' At least I've seen that often in my travels.

524 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:03:10pm

re: #405 jimc

I see mostly hacks here.

Are they all dressed in red?

/Wait a minute, I'm wearing red!

525 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:03:14pm

re: #519 little boomer

I thought it was Joshua Bar Joseph.

So Simon's father was Sinister?

526 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:03:18pm

Of course, all of this is speculation, because there are no records (outside of the Gospels) that he actually existed. And the Gospels don't record his "full name." I think theoretically, one could also be named after one's place of birth or hometown, so he could have been "Jesus the Nazarene" (Jesus Nazarenus, to the Romans).

527 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:03:19pm

re: #518 Thanos

Which is more pathetic and loathesome:

Con men who prey on people's religious beliefs to scam money and fame, or Con men who prey on people's political beliefs to scam money and fame, or con men who prey on people's social fears to scam money and fame?

Aren't all three types are all too easy to see coming a mile away?

You left out con men who prey on people's hopes for the 200 mpg carburetor, and such.

528 yochanan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:03:20pm

O.T.

any canadian lizards got info on the beheading in canada? reports don't give the name or ethinic group of the attacker

is he muslim or just nuts?

529 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:03:25pm

re: #514 Dirk Diggler

I was joking. I know that "bin", "ibn", and the like represent "son of". I saw the 13th Warrior.


Uch.

COuld've been a great flik, but failed miserably.

530 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:03:44pm

re: #506 zombie

His name was Yeshua ben Yoseph -- one's "last name" back then was simply "son of" (ben) [your father's name].


Makes perfect sense.

Weren't you also referred to relating to where you were born?

531 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:04:23pm

re: #519 little boomer

I thought it was Joshua Bar Joseph.

Same thing.

532 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:04:38pm

Gotta go.
Everyone have a great evening.

533 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:04:50pm

The Hebrew word for "maiden" was translated into Greek as "virgin."

FLAME WAR!

534 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:05:01pm

re: #512 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Why they stopped calling him Yeshua, I'll never understand. Love the sound of it.

It's because the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages chose Latin as its official language, and "Jesus" is the Latinization of the Hebrew name "Yeshua." We've been stuck with it ever since.

535 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:05:12pm
536 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:05:21pm

re: #488 godfrey

Because it's about including supernatural explanations in science and also condemning blasphemous free speech. Theocracy stinks.

537 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:05:28pm

re: #514 Dirk Diggler

I was joking. I know that "bin", "ibn", and the like represent "son of". I saw the 13th Warrior.

Ich bin ein Berliner = I am the son of a jelly donut.

538 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:05:42pm

re: #157 Kerfuffle

Sorry to distract from the ongoing Darwin/creation/ID obsession, but did you see the story of the man who decapitated someone on a Greyhound bus last night?

Yikes, some bold demons prowling about.

That's some freaky shit. One kind of funny line in the article, though:

Greyhound spokesman Eric Wesley, speaking from Texas, said drivers are trained to get help as soon as they can when incidents occur.

"This is very rare, unique occurrence. Bus transportation is one of the safest modes of transportation. This is highly unique that something like this happened," he said.

Like people are going to worry about this when they buy bus tickets?

539 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:05:47pm

re: #526 zombie

Not true. Cf. Josephus, Pliny, and others.

540 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:06:23pm

re: #517 Ben Hur.

Jesus is Yehoshua translated into Greek.

Jews call him "Yeshu" because letters that usually refer to G-d were taken out.

I thought that Jesus was not an uncommon name at the time & did not refer to divinity. I will not make a sophomoric reference to any Alou brother

541 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:06:32pm

re: #429 Slumbering Behemoth

Let's not leave out the hacks that will immediately call it authentic without further observation. Or the hacks that will likely say "It's real, no you can't test it for yourselves, just trust us".

Absolutely!

542 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:06:45pm

re: #539 godfrey

Not true. Cf. Josephus, Pliny, and others.

Lots of Roman references, 'tis true.

543 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:06:47pm

re: #523 Annar

I think Jesus's second name was 'Saves.' At least I've seen that often in my travels.

I've also seen "Freak". :)

544 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:07:00pm

re: #534 zombie

It's because the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages chose Latin as its official language, and "Jesus" is the Latinization of the Hebrew name "Yeshua." We've been stuck with it ever since.

First into Greek, then Latin.

545 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:07:03pm

re: #520 Sharmuta

I think trying to turn science into it's own religion is wrong on two fronts


The problem is that the only people who are claiming science is a religion are the Disco Institute and their shills. Myers is not advocating science should become a religion.

546 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:07:09pm

re: #540 opnion

Yeah you will. Heh.

547 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:07:29pm

re: #540 opnion

.


I thought that Jesus was not an uncommon name at the time & did not refer to divinity. I will not make a sophomoric reference to any Alou brother

It was common.

As Yehoshua.

548 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:07:56pm

re: #543 Cygnus

I've also seen "Freak". :)


Yehoshua means "Salvation."

549 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:08:10pm

re: #533 Ben Hur

The Hebrew word for "maiden" was translated into Greek as "virgin."

FLAME WAR!

Maidens, virgins, whatever.

I'll have 72 please, hold the raisins.

550 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:08:19pm

re: #547 Ben Hur

It was common.

As Yehoshua.

Yumpin' Yehosophat

551 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:08:50pm

re: #526 zombie

If I'm not mistaken there are no mentions of the Jews until they showed up a Jerusalem. The Egyptians have no record of the Jews or the Exodus.

552 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:09:08pm

Son of Hur,

Uch.

COuld've been a great flik, but failed miserably.

I thought it was a great flick.

553 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:09:13pm

re: #546 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Yeah you will. Heh.

Ok, there was Mattie, Felipe & I forgot the other.

554 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:09:23pm

re: #522 Ben Hur

I know.

See my #404.

LOL. I'm getting dizzy.

555 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:09:29pm
556 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:01pm

Imhotep! Imhotep!

557 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:13pm

re: #553 opnion

Shemp.

558 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:19pm

re: #539 godfrey

Not true. Cf. Josephus, Pliny, and others.

Not this again!

The Josephus reference was a later interpolation added centuries after the fact. It's not in the original version. I.e. it's a known fake. They even know the name of the monk who added it. The Pliny reference could have referred to any number of charismatic messiah types running around in that era.

I know many classical scholars. Believe me, they all agree that there are no verifiable references to Jesus Christ outside of the Christian Gospels.

559 Cygnus  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:24pm

re: #548 Ben Hur

Yehoshua means "Salvation."

I know that. Yeshua Hama'schiah.

560 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:25pm

re: #518 Thanos

Aren't all three types are all too easy to see coming a mile away?

I'd say yes, but it doesn't account for people that want to be deceived.

561 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:39pm

re: #551 Killgore Trout

If I'm not mistaken there are no mentions of the Jews until they showed up a Jerusalem. The Egyptians have no record of the Jews or the Exodus.


That's not true.

There are hyrogliphics.

562 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:48pm

re: #555 buzzsawmonkey

Their bureaucracy has gotten no better in the last 3500 years, either.

Brings the font meeting to mind. Can you see an Egyptian guy in line, jumping mad?

"Raven Waves Bundle of Wheat Snake God!"

563 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:10:49pm

re: #542 Capitalist Tool

Lots of Roman references, 'tis true.

'Tis not true.

Show me.

564 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:11:06pm

re: #555 buzzsawmonkey

The ancient Greeks managed to go from Linear A to Linear B. What went wrong?

/

565 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:11:21pm

re: #551 Killgore Trout

If I'm not mistaken there are no mentions of the Jews until they showed up a Jerusalem. The Egyptians have no record of the Jews or the Exodus.

Neither were the pyramids built by the Jews, (regardless of C. B. DeMille) nor has any evidence of 40,000 people wandering through the desert been found.

566 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:11:31pm

re: #544 Ben Hur

First into Greek, then Latin.

Yes.

567 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:11:41pm

re: #551 Killgore Trout

If I'm not mistaken there are no mentions of the Jews until they showed up a Jerusalem. The Egyptians have no record of the Jews or the Exodus.

Exodus Denier!

568 Basho  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:12:18pm

re: #551 Killgore Trout

If I'm not mistaken there are no mentions of the Jews until they showed up a Jerusalem. The Egyptians have no record of the Jews or the Exodus.

I wouldn't be too sure. I once saw this program on PBS called "Walking The Bible" and there seemed to be some evidence Egyptian evidence for some of the events that happened during the exodus. Although I have no memory of the exact details.

569 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:12:26pm

re: #558 zombie

Fortunately, there are more copies of the synoptic gospels from that period than there are of any known Roman text.

570 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:12:34pm

re: #518 Thanos

Which is more pathetic and loathesome:

Con men who prey on people's religious beliefs to scam money and fame, or Con men who prey on people's political beliefs to scam money and fame, or con men who prey on people's social fears to scam money and fame?

Aren't all three types are all too easy to see coming a mile away?

They are all pathetic and loathsome and their craft is to prey on others weaknesses, whatever they may be.
Conmen that are proficient at their craft, I hesitate to call them good, are often not easy to see.

571 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:12:40pm

Cygnus,

Ich bin ein Berliner = I am the son of a jelly donut.

I watched that speech on Youtube the other day. Very moving and powerful. There's also a funny part where Kennedy thanks his interpreter for translating his German.

572 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:12:43pm

re: #545 Killgore Trout

And Giberson is opposed to ID in the science classrooms. I read his book- he's a former creationist who couldn't continue to be a literalist and a scientist. I don't think that article is advocating ID in any way, shape or form. He's just making the argument that science can not know everything, and I think he's right.

573 jimc  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:12:54pm

re: #426 yma o hyd

Ahem.
Why is one not allowed to use one's common sense - and perhaps experience of looking at tracks - to debate this?
Are only geologists and palaeontologists allowed an opinion, but not us normal people who may ahve an interest, may have read about things, may even have seen things like fossilised dionsaur prints on beaches?

Next, we'll be told to leave all those really difficult decisions, like whom to vote for, to some board of experts and not trouble our little minds with anything ...

You can use common sense, you can have an opinion, and common people can debate about their opinions and throw around "facts" but nothing should be thrown out just because it "doesn't fit". If anything a scientist should be eager to find out how this thing exists, be it fake or some anomaly. But my original point is that it is not very scientific to reject something outright without test because it doesn't fit your established viewpoint, that is called dogma and is faith not science.

Yes there are certain truths but then there are certainly things that were once thought to be true only to be wrong. If you think not, then you're not looking hard enough....

574 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:13:12pm
575 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:13:30pm

re: #571 Dirk Diggler

Was there a cutaway shot to the interpreter laughing his ass off?

576 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:13:35pm

re: #563 zombie

'Tis not true.

Show me.

I'll have to dig it out, but read refs w/ mine own eyes in one of the Great Books. Talked about the troublesome nature of the followers of Jesus the Jew.

577 Basho  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:13:38pm

re: #561 Ben Hur

That's not true.

There are hyrogliphics.

I think he's right.

578 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:13:49pm

re: #565 Capitalist Tool

Neither were the pyramids built by the Jews, (regardless of C. B. DeMille) nor has any evidence of 40,000 people wandering through the desert been found.

Sure they did.

579 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:14:04pm

re: #565 Capitalist Tool

The best explanation I've seen is that they were a nomadic tribe in the desert around Jerusalem who were raiding small towns and caravans. Once they took Jerusalem they decided to settle down.

580 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:14:09pm
581 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:14:23pm

re: #569 godfrey

Fortunately, there are more copies of the synoptic gospels from that period than there are of any known Roman text.

Yes, but the earliest manuscripts still date to two generations after Jesus' time. I.e. after the fact. There are no mentions of Jesus actually written during the time he was supposed to be around.

582 stymie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:14:26pm

No Darwin wasn't stupid, just mistaken. Because the Lord created the world with apparent age back in 11,013 BC, this allowed crackpot theories like evolution to appear possible. Another time truth-the flood of Noah's day was in 4990BC, which brings the 7,000 anniversary of the Flood to 2,011AD. This will be the last year of Earth's history. May 21, 2011 is probably the very last day, in that that is 7,000 years TO THE VERY DAY that Noah was shut into the ark.

583 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:15:30pm
584 formercorpsman  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:15:41pm

Last names were uncommon during this time in history.

Surnames were patronymic or matronymic, and became en vogue a little more than 1000 years after the time of Jesus.

During this time, the culture would have differentiated people by location, occupation, ben or bar, etc.

585 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:15:43pm

re: #423 Kenneth

Do you recall the osiery some "archeologist" was claimed once held the bones of Jesus? When scientists finally got a chance to examine it they discovered the carved writing on the exterior was only a few years old -certain chemical reactions happen to limestone exposed to an air surface. If the carving was done 2000 years ago, different chemicals would have been found. It was proven a forgery.

CBC, 2007

"Bones of Jesus found, Canadian documentary claims

"Titanic director James Cameron and Canadian filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici say they aren't trying to undermine Christianity in their new documentary that claims the remains of Jesus, his wife, Mary Magdalene, and their child have been found.

"Oscar-winner Cameron and Gemini-winner Jacobovici unveiled two limestone boxes they believe once contained the remains of Jesus and Mary Magdalene during a news conference Monday at the New York Public Library.

"Cameron, best-known for producing the blockbuster movie Titanic, said the $4-million US documentary doesn't set out to undermine Christianity...

"The documentary examines 10 ancient ossuaries, first found in a tomb by a construction crew working in the Jerusalem suburb of Talpiyot in 1980. Experts from the Israeli Antiquities Authority excavated the site shortly after, finding the 10 limestone boxes inside.

"Six of the ten limestone boxes were inscribed with names that could be translated as Jesus, Mary, Matthew, Joseph, Mary Magdalene and Judah, son of Jesus, said Jacobovici.

"Some experts have countered these were common Jewish names at the time and that Jesus' carpenter father couldn't have afforded a crypt for his family..."

586 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:15:49pm

re: #558 zombie

Zombie, apparently the passage in Josephus is still disputed. Wiki has what appears to be a fair discussion which does not rely on arguments appealing to popularity.

587 yochanan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:16:01pm

re: #538 Salem

Like people are going to worry about this when they buy bus tickets?

any canadian lizards got info on the beheading in canada? reports don't give the name or ethinic group of the attacker

is he muslim or just nuts?

588 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:16:03pm

re: #568 Basho

There was a military revolt around that time, there is some speculation that Moses might have been a general and the Jews might have been soldiers but Egyptian account only mentions the revolt. No mention of Moses or Jews.

589 mean Gene  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:16:09pm

A complete re-write of History is being done as we speak.
Jews will have ''come out of nowhere.''
Jesus the Christ will be proven to be either a figment of the imaginings of messianic Jews in the first century OR a bit of creative writing on the part of persecuted Jews after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans.
What else?
Oh!
Colombus' crew were Muslims and when they got here the Indian chiefs had been named Muslim names and called various places Muslim/Arabic names, too.
What else?
Come on you guys, you know you want to.

590 Dirk Diggler  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:16:56pm
No Darwin wasn't stupid, just mistaken. Because the Lord created the world with apparent age back in 11,013 BC, this allowed crackpot theories like evolution to appear possible. Another time truth-the flood of Noah's day was in 4990BC, which brings the 7,000 anniversary of the Flood to 2,011AD. This will be the last year of Earth's history. May 21, 2011 is probably the very last day, in that that is 7,000 years TO THE VERY DAY that Noah was shut into the ark.

Isn't that the plot of the new X-Files movie?

591 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:17:09pm

re: #581 zombie

Yes, but the earliest manuscripts still date to two generations after Jesus' time. I.e. after the fact. There are no mentions of Jesus actually written during the time he was supposed to be around.

Actually, there are fragments of John's gospel that are reasonably dated to the first century.

And I thought Egyptians mentioned "Apiru" or "Hapiru", which is often considered a possible reference to the Hebrews.

592 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:17:10pm

re: #582 stymie

Come-on, your kidding...right?

593 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:17:15pm

re: #557 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Shemp.

We have a winner! Shemp Alou, he played right field for the Mets

594 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:17:20pm

re: #582 stymie

That is just nuts.

595 debutaunt  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:17:46pm

re: #568 Basho

I wouldn't be too sure. I once saw this program on PBS called "Walking The Bible" and there seemed to be some evidence Egyptian evidence for some of the events that happened during the exodus. Although I have no memory of the exact details.

PBS? Say no more.

596 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:18:16pm

re: #576 Capitalist Tool

I'll have to dig it out, but read refs w/ mine own eyes in one of the Great Books. Talked about the troublesome nature of the followers of Jesus the Jew.

I know the reference you're talkiing about. It was about his followers, not him, and was written sometime around 70AD-100AD. Again, not a contemporary reference to Jesus himself.

We already know there was a religion surrounding Jesus the Christ starting about 70 AD. Plenty of evidence for that. What there's no evidence for (again, outside of sacred Christian texts included in the Bible) is that there was an actual guy who walked around between 1AD and 33 AD.

597 Ben Hur  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:18:51pm

JESUS SAVES.

MOSES INVESTS.

And with that, BBL!

598 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:19:10pm

re: #597 Ben Hur

Heh.

599 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:19:20pm

re: #596 zombie

Ok, I see what you're saying.

600 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:20:04pm

re: #589 mean Gene

We're just debating history and arguing evidence. You shouldn't be offended.

601 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:20:46pm

re: #581 zombie

Yes, but the earliest manuscripts still date to two generations after Jesus' time.

i.e. 66 years? Not an impressive length, particularly given the strongly oral culture of the time, emphasis on verbatim memory, etc. That length of time makes common sense, actually, because when the eyewitnesses begin to die off, you tend to find anxiety about preserving their testimony.

602 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:20:58pm

Parachute fail? Jesus Saves!

603 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:21:33pm

re: #584 formercorpsman

Last names were uncommon during this time in history.

Surnames were patronymic or matronymic, and became en vogue a little more than 1000 years after the time of Jesus.

During this time, the culture would have differentiated people by location, occupation, ben or bar, etc.

Good explanation. That is what I thougt.
Even in the 10th Century the High King of Ireland who fought the Danes was referred to by location. He was from Cashell in Boruma and became Brian Boru. O'brian means of that guy

604 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:21:40pm

Pretty sure it was in Tacitus... can't find my book.

605 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:23:13pm

re: #589 mean Gene

Look, you know the atheists always hang out in the kitchen talking about religion, science and world history. Just quietly get your beer, then scoot back out to the living room where you won't be able to hear them.

606 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:23:37pm

re: #586 godfrey

Zombie, apparently the passage in Josephus is still disputed. Wiki has what appears to be a fair discussion which does not rely on arguments appealing to popularity.

The key passage in that is,

The authenticity of the Testimonium Flavianum has been disputed since the 17th century, and by the mid 18th century the consensus view was that it was a forgery. This conclusion was questioned in the 20th century and the intellectual controversy will probably never be resolved.

Every classical scholar I've ever met (and I've met a lot of them -- don't ask), is 100% positive that the Testimonium Flavianum is a forgery. I even talked with someone whose entire career was devoted to Josephus, and he thought so as well.

Again, I realize this is an "appeal to authority" argument, but since we are not experts in the field, and don't have the original documents in front of us, it's the best we can do.

607 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:25:08pm

re: #591 vxbush

Actually, there are fragments of John's gospel that are reasonably dated to the first century.

First century = 70AD = two generations after Jesus.

608 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:25:37pm

World's oldest joke traced back to 1900 BC

The world's oldest recorded joke has been traced back to 1900 BC and suggests that toilet humor was as popular with the ancients as it is today.

It is a saying of the Sumerians, who lived in what is now southern Iraq and goes: "Something which has never occurred since time immemorial; a young woman did not fart in her husband's lap."

Heh, still funny.

609 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:26:24pm

re: #597 Ben Hur

JESUS SAVES.

MOSES INVESTS.

And with that, BBL!

I thought it went like this.

Jesus Saves,
Passes to Moses,
Moses Shoots,
He Scores!

610 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:26:35pm

re: #607 zombie

First century = 70AD = two generations after Jesus.

If I remember the details correctly (and I'm not sure I do), I thought they had it down to one generation, closer to 50 ad.

611 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:26:58pm

re: #587 yochanan

any canadian lizards got info on the beheading in canada? reports don't give the name or ethinic group of the attacker

is he muslim or just nuts?

Yeah, I don't know. I guess there could be something to it.

612 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:27:08pm

re: #596 zombie

Why would you expect to find references to Jesus in other texts in the first place? Jesus was obscure.

Why would you count marginal references as more persuasive than the evidence of eyewitnesses?

What there's no evidence for (again, outside of sacred Christian texts included in the Bible)

This is an implicit ad hominem.

Furthermore, those texts weren't "sacred" (part of a canon) while they were circulating. They were evidently, and for good rational, evidential reasons considered much more trustworthy than "gnostic" texts circulating at the time.

The reality of the "historical Jesus" is very well-founded.

613 mean Gene  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:27:21pm

re: #600 Killgore Trout

You are playing at debating history, KT.
If you were really debating it you would be able to provide a link to some writer to back you up.
The bandwagon of revisionist history has left the station.
Howard Zinn is in the lead.
You are lining up behind him.
Unless you have classical proofs: contemporary writers, good witnesses, persons who proved the conviction of their view by their own persecution.
Stuff like that.
Re-read the threads here about Ward Churchill.
He made stuff up out of whole cloth, footnoting his own previous writings as his ''sources.''
You can claim there is ''no proof'' of Christianity before 70CE but what IS proof?
When James is beheaded for what he refused to stop speaking about, when Christians in Rome faced lions and gladiators rather than throw a pinch of incense on the bust of Claudius (I think it was Claudius) do their acts mean nothing?
What have the detractors done to prove their mettle?
Nothing that I have ever seen.

614 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:27:26pm

re: #608 Killgore Trout

World's oldest joke traced back to 1900 BC


Heh, still funny.


Not so sure that, that is the oldest joke. Andy Rooney says tht he was there for one older. 'Ever wonder why?"

615 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:27:29pm

re: #607 zombie

First century = 70AD = two generations after Jesus.

However, there are indications that some of the epistles are written before 70ad. For example, Hebrews talks about temple worship. If the temple were already destroyed (as it was by that date), then the book would not have referenced it or would have referred to it in the past.

616 HelloDare  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:27:30pm

re: #558 zombie

Not this again!

The Josephus reference was a later interpolation added centuries after the fact. It's not in the original version. I.e. it's a known fake. They even know the name of the monk who added it. The Pliny reference could have referred to any number of charismatic messiah types running around in that era.

I know many classical scholars. Believe me, they all agree that there are no verifiable references to Jesus Christ outside of the Christian Gospels.

Besides, Josephus was born after Jesus supposedly died. Even if Josephus popped out of the womb scribbling, it would stretch the term "contemporary" reference. But that's beside the point. There are no verifiable references by Josephus.

617 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:27:58pm
618 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:28:04pm

re: #602 Slumbering Behemoth

Parachute fail? Jesus Saves!

And apparently, this angers Thor.

619 HelloDare  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:29:22pm

re: #608 Killgore Trout

Thought the oldest joke was, "Take my goat...please."

620 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:29:53pm

re: #613 mean Gene

You are playing at debating history, KT.
If you were really debating it you would be able to provide a link to some writer to back you up.


I'm not a historian, not even an amateur one. If I'm wrong I'm sure someone will correct me. That's the way it works.

621 vxbush  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:30:06pm

Eh--gotta go. Enjoy the rest of the day, lizards!

622 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:31:24pm

re: #618 Slumbering Behemoth

And apparently, this angers Thor.

Uh-oh. Killgore might have a new avatar.

623 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:32:02pm

re: #619 HelloDare

Thought the oldest joke was, "Take my goat...please."

Or how about "Look Og! Dinosaur!... Ha Ha, Made you look!"

624 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:32:20pm

re: #610 vxbush

If I remember the details correctly (and I'm not sure I do), I thought they had it down to one generation, closer to 50 ad.

Well, I don't follow the field too closely. Could be.

I not saying definitively that Jesus did not physically exist. Not at all. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" -- how true that is. He could very well have existed, and all records of him were destroyed by the Romans, for example. All I'm saying is that there is no actual proof there ever was such a person, so (if you're so inclined) the matter remains up for debate.

There's a strong scholarly view that Jesus was an ideal, or perhaps an amalgamation of other figures, or that he did exist but was a minor figure until later lionized after his death. We may never know for sure.

625 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:32:49pm

i remember an old holy- roller neighbor woman tellin' my Mom, "If you believe in evolution, you can't prove to me you aren't a pig." and then forever after looking at that old lady as being grossly stupid.

626 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:32:50pm

re: #618 Slumbering Behemoth

And apparently, this angers Thor.

And I thought inter-service rivalries could get bitter.

627 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:33:02pm

re: #606 zombie

Again, I realize this is an "appeal to authority" argument, but since we are not experts in the field, and don't have the original documents in front of us, it's the best we can do.

No, it's not. The best we can do is read the scholarship, determine where the preponderance of evidence and logic lies, and go with that. If we can't do that, then we hold the question in abeyance until more evidence appears.

Meantime, there is a mountain of other evidence to consider. For starters.

628 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:33:50pm

re: #612 godfrey

The reality of the "historical Jesus" is very well-founded.

Evidence, please. I've never seen any, and I've been interested in the topic for a very long time.

629 Boondock St. Bender  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:33:52pm

re: #568 Basho

the egyptians were not in the habit of publicising their embarassments(try to find a military defeat on their carved hyroglyphs)and as kilgore stated there are some scholars who feel the isrealites were brought into the kingdom during a time of egyptian military weakness,to shore up defences.as time went on,more competent pharohs did not ned them as military reserves,disarmed them and sent them to menial tasks.in time the isrealites rebeled,and left egypt.

630 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:33:53pm

re: #613 mean Gene

Here's the earliest proof I can find to Jews in Egypt:

In the Elephantine papyri, caches of legal documents and letters written in Aramaic amply document the lives of a community of Jewish soldiers stationed in there as part of a frontier garrison in Egypt for the Achaemenid Empire. Established at Elephantine in about 650 BC during Manasseh's reign, these soldiers assisted Pharaoh Psammetichus I in his Nubian campaign. Their religious system shows strong traces of Babylonian polytheism, something which suggests to certain scholars that the community was of mixed Judaeo-Samaritan origins,[3] and they maintained their own temple, being functioning alongside that of the local deity Chnum. The documents cover the period 495 to 399 BC.
631 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:34:02pm

re: #608 Killgore Trout

World's oldest joke traced back to 1900 BC


Heh, still funny.

I guess you had to be then.

632 hazzyday  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:34:04pm

From the linked Kuban articles.

"Morris' article is an unfortunate sign for young earth creationism. It indicates an unwillingness to fully abandon past claims (no matter how well-refuted), and a return to the same kind of faulty research, deficient documentation, and inaccurate reporting that fostered the Paluxy mess in the first place. "

This is a good example of how evolution studies can point out to the yec'rs that their faith is just grasping at straws. The yec'rs are applying a dark age psychology that is more in service of the Devil then it is in the service of God. If witch burning were permissible they would still be at it.

Not all of modern thought is accurate, but compared to the middle ages ...

633 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:34:35pm

re: #624 zombie

There's also quite a lot of talk out there that the old Testament is allegorical also.

634 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:34:41pm

re: #624 zombie

Well, I don't follow the field too closely. Could be.

I not saying definitively that Jesus did not physically exist. Not at all. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" -- how true that is. He could very well have existed, and all records of him were destroyed by the Romans, for example. All I'm saying is that there is no actual proof there ever was such a person, so (if you're so inclined) the matter remains up for debate.

There's a strong scholarly view that Jesus was an ideal, or perhaps an amalgamation of other figures, or that he did exist but was a minor figure until later lionized after his death. We may never know for sure.

I must disagree. There is proof that a Jesus of Nazereth DID exist. The historian Josephus DOES mention him specifically. And makes reference to him as a quasi messiah.

635 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:35:45pm

re: #624 zombie

We may never know for sure.

Nonsense. The synoptic gospels are the testimonies of eyewitnesses. Denying their value as evidence is absurd.

Jesus existed.

636 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:36:26pm

re: #608 Killgore Trout

World's oldest joke traced back to 1900 BC

Heh, still funny.

Was that a joke or the world's first anthroplological scholarship?

637 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:36:45pm

re: #628 zombie

Evidence, please. I've never seen any, and I've been interested in the topic for a very long time.

I'd be interested, too, as my understanding is the same as yours.

(That said, I think it's likely that the mythological figure of Jesus was based on somebody... it would be quite odd if he were invented completely out of whole cloth.)

638 JamesWI  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:38:33pm

re: #582 stymie

No Darwin wasn't stupid, just mistaken. Because the Lord created the world with apparent age back in 11,013 BC, this allowed crackpot theories like evolution to appear possible. Another time truth-the flood of Noah's day was in 4990BC, which brings the 7,000 anniversary of the Flood to 2,011AD. This will be the last year of Earth's history. May 21, 2011 is probably the very last day, in that that is 7,000 years TO THE VERY DAY that Noah was shut into the ark.

Could you quote the Bible verse where God says, 7000 years after I started the flood, I will destroy the world again? Seeing as, you know, every year there are batshit crazy people like you who think "this year is the last year! No, seriously this time, ignore the fact that I've said it like 5 years in a row. The Bible clearly indicates that we are all going to die this year, and I'm going to be your leader!"

639 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:38:35pm

re: #634 Nevergiveup

I must disagree. There is proof that a Jesus of Nazereth DID exist. The historian Josephus DOES mention him specifically. And makes reference to him as a quasi messiah.

Please re-read the thread above. We already debunked the whole "Jospephus" question.

Please show me the proof, if you say it exists.

Note: Anything written after 70AD is not proof, since it was written long after the fact.

640 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:39:12pm

re: #634 Nevergiveup

I must disagree. There is proof that a Jesus of Nazereth DID exist. The historian Josephus DOES mention him specifically. And makes reference to him as a quasi messiah.

Zombie's point was, I think, that the most contemporary of Roman and other historians to Jesus life wrote long after the time of Christ. Suetonius, Tacitus, Josephus

641 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:39:18pm

Ah, but the real question is did Homer actually exist?

//there is no evidence for Duff in the fossil records...

642 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:39:28pm

re: #628 zombie

Zombie, I respect your passion for evidence and your Enlightenment spirit. If you can't accept the synoptic gospels as evidence, then in my opinion you are ignoring the elephant in the room, and that's the source of your trouble, not the lack of marginalia in ancient non-Christian texts.

643 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:39:59pm

re: #635 godfrey

Nonsense. The synoptic gospels are the testimonies of eyewitnesses.

But godfrey, not in the way we would use that phrase today. It's not like Matt, Mark, Luke and John were taken by Roman cops to separate rooms shortly after the Resurrection and asked to write down everything that happened, and those manuscripts have survived to this day. Nobody has an "original" Gospel manuscript.

644 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:40:08pm

re: #635 godfrey

Nonsense. The synoptic gospels are the testimonies of eyewitnesses. Denying their value as evidence is absurd.

Jesus existed.

Let me fix that:

The synoptic gospels are the purported testimonies of eyewitnesses written decades after Jesus was supposed to have lived.

645 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:40:14pm

re: #635 godfrey

Nonsense. The synoptic gospels are the testimonies of eyewitnesses. Denying their value as evidence is absurd.

Jesus existed.

One could deny the existence of Jesus just from the gospels. But when you couple it with an Independent account- " The Jewish War" by Josephus, it becomes much much harder to deny. Ask any Theologian or Historian.

646 Boondock St. Bender  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:40:30pm

re: #628 zombie

from everything i have read on the subject,there has never been any contemporarie accounts of jesus.now that does not mean he didn't exist,people in that time did not leave quite the paper trail we do today.(actually,i remember reading quite a list of famous ancients who left no real evidence of their existence.besides of course the lituriture we have today)

647 JamesWI  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:41:25pm

re: #638 JamesWI

Sigh . . . Thinking it over again, why in the world would I reply to quite possibly the most obvious troll I have seen on this site . . . maybe I'm losing it.

648 profitsbeard  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:41:40pm

So there were no small, five "fingered" dinosaurs with large "thumbs" (since the deep, circular depression on the top, far left looks somewhat anamalous for a Creationist's "Man Meets Dinsoaur" theory) that would fit this stony image better than retrojecting a humanoid into the Jurassic?

I would hypothesize that Bigfoot -with the three toes- was just about to eat Littlehand -with the five digits- when this impression was made.

I can almost hear the prehistoric burp.

649 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:41:47pm

re: #319 Ben Hur


WTF is THIS?

Sweet mother of Thag. That thing makes me itch just to look at it.

650 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:43:01pm

re: #643 Occasional Reader

OR, if that's your standard of proof, I venture to say it's an unreasonable one. Do we have any eyewitness testimonies from that period of the kind you describe? Why would Romans bother to write down the testimony of some scraggly fisherman in a distant province?

651 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:43:09pm

re: #640 Capitalist Tool

Zombie's point was, I think, that the most contemporary of Roman and other historians to Jesus life wrote long after the time of Christ. Suetonius, Tacitus, Josephus

Josephus was not Roman. He was a Jew. He was a turn coat Jewish General and historian familiar with the peoples and personalities of Judea. He writes of Jesus in passing and has no particular interest in fabricating the story.

652 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:43:22pm

re: #642 godfrey


If you can't accept the synoptic gospels as evidence

Speaking for myself, it's not that I don't accept them as evidence, it's that I don't accept them as dispositive evidence.

And speaking on any other subject than your religious faith; would accept as dispositive evidence texts that post-dated the events in question by many decades, that can't be conclusively shown to be written by the people claimed as the authors, and that would already likely have been prone to "massage" in order to make them consistent and to advance an agenda?

653 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:43:59pm

re: #649 rawmuse

Sweet mother of Thag. That thing makes me itch just to look at it.

Cthulhu knows...

654 Thanos  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:44:03pm

re: #582 stymie

Mandy is that you ?

655 hazzyday  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:44:50pm

re: #582 stymie

No Darwin wasn't stupid, just mistaken. Because the Lord created the world with apparent age back in 11,013 BC, this allowed crackpot theories like evolution to appear possible. Another time truth-the flood of Noah's day was in 4990BC, which brings the 7,000 anniversary of the Flood to 2,011AD. This will be the last year of Earth's history. May 21, 2011 is probably the very last day, in that that is 7,000 years TO THE VERY DAY that Noah was shut into the ark.

Have you ever contributed anything productive to society? I mean sincerely.

656 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:45:15pm

re: #647 JamesWI

Don't beat yourself up- sometimes responding to them just can't be resisted.

657 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:45:37pm

re: #650 godfrey

OR, if that's your standard of proof, I venture to say it's an unreasonable one. Do we have any eyewitness testimonies from that period of the kind you describe? Why would Romans bother to write down the testimony of some scraggly fisherman in a distant province?

My point is, I've heard the "Gospels are eyewitness evidence" line before, and no offense intended, but it's a distortion of that phrase as we understand it.

658 Oh no...Sand People!  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:45:42pm

re: #644 zombie

Let me fix that:

The synoptic gospels are the purported testimonies of eyewitnesses written decades after Jesus was supposed to have lived.

How about a book whose history dates approximately 2500 B.C. up to 400 A.D. and spans the rise and fall of 3 civilizations, but was translated approximately in 1830 A.D. which describes Jesus visit to the Western Hemisphere after his resurrection?

/ducks under desk.

659 jorline  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:45:44pm

re: #582 stymie

No Darwin wasn't stupid, just mistaken. Because the Lord created the world with apparent age back in 11,013 BC, this allowed crackpot theories like evolution to appear possible. Another time truth-the flood of Noah's day was in 4990BC, which brings the 7,000 anniversary of the Flood to 2,011AD. This will be the last year of Earth's history. May 21, 2011 is probably the very last day, in that that is 7,000 years TO THE VERY DAY that Noah was shut into the ark.

You're as screwed up as the Jehovah's Witnesses.

660 Thanos  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:45:44pm

oops gotta get the coals going.... back in a bit

661 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:46:14pm

s that what this is all about Noachs' arch?

662 Thanos  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:46:17pm

I think Stymie is someone's sock pulling our leg.

663 Boondock St. Bender  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:46:25pm

re: #634 Nevergiveup

josephus was writing in ad 69.After the romans had defeated/reduced the city josephus was defending.(josephus definately decided that discretion was the better part of valor)that was at least 30 years after the fact.

664 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:46:37pm

Booga booga!

665 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:46:40pm

re: #644 zombie

Decades?!?! Scholars, run in horror!

While I have trouble remembering certain episodes in my college career, I can, I assure you, describe in perfect detail, and often verbatim, the conversations and experiences I had then with certain people.

And believe me, I'm no Memory Palace master.

666 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:47:46pm

re: #658 Oh no...Sand People!

How about a book whose history dates approximately 2500 B.C. up to 400 A.D.

Um, the problem being, nobody can actually point to a actual copy of that book that can be reliably dated to prior to... oh... 1830 A.D. or so.

667 stymie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:47:55pm

re: #551 Killgore Trout

Do you think the Egyptian historians would write about the humiliating defeat and destruction of Pharoah Tutmoses III and his entire army of chariots and horsemen at the hands of the Lord while chasing a group of runaway slaves, or leave that out.

668 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:48:08pm
669 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:48:22pm

re: #642 godfrey

Zombie, I respect your passion for evidence and your Enlightenment spirit. If you can't accept the synoptic gospels as evidence, then in my opinion you are ignoring the elephant in the room, and that's the source of your trouble, not the lack of marginalia in ancient non-Christian texts.

I'm not talking about faith or belief here. I'm talking about impartial, forensic or contemporary documentary evidence, of which there is none. The known "evidence" for Jesus is all a self-contained system.

If a manuscript of the Gospels dating to 33AD or 35 AD or even 40AD turns up -- sure, that'd be pretty convincing, and I'd accept that. But none have. Nor is there a single written or physical scrap of evidence outside of the Gospels. Not one. If there really was all that stuff happening in the Holy Land as described, you'd think that something would be recorded in the writings of the era. But -- zilch.

Again, I'm not saying "Jesus did not exist." I'm only talking as a historian here, and we simply can't say for sure, non-religiously speaking.

670 HelloDare  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:48:33pm
671 Oh no...Sand People!  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:48:41pm

re: #666 Occasional Reader

Um, the problem being, nobody can actually point to a actual copy of that book that can be reliably dated to prior to... oh... 1830 A.D. or so.

Geesh...picky, picky.

/

672 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:49:06pm

re: #650 godfrey

Why would Romans bother to write down the testimony of some scraggly fisherman in a distant province?

It is possible that the Romans could have kept records of JC, they took enough trouble to execute him. Somebody might have written something about it in government records or a letter or something.

673 yochanan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:49:27pm

fox just had ron paul on and he was talking about one of the few issues i agree with him on..... bites my tounge the feds on pot.

674 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:49:29pm
675 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:50:11pm

re: #670 HelloDare

Take your pick: 220 DATES FOR THE END OF THE WORLD.

Sheesh, talk about pressure! It's enough stress for single people finding a date for New Year's Eve.

676 hazzyday  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:50:20pm

re: #662 Thanos

I think Stymie is someone's sock pulling our leg.

THey need to tag themselves in both cases as

/whitenoise

677 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:50:49pm

re: #663 Boondock St. Bender

josephus was writing in ad 69.After the romans had defeated/reduced the city josephus was defending.(josephus definately decided that discretion was the better part of valor)that was at least 30 years after the fact.

And your point. Josephus was already a mature individual by the time of the events- perhaps in his 40 or 50's. So in his formative years in Judea growing up he might only have been 10-20 years removed from the events at hand. In the great majority of Josephus's writings, he has been proven to be historically CORRECT. He certainly stretched the truth and color things for his own purposes, but he has been proven to be a rather reliable historian.

678 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:51:04pm

re: #672 Killgore Trout

It is possible that the Romans could have kept records of JC, they took enough trouble to execute him. Somebody might have written something about it in government records or a letter or something.

Or mugshots, with fingerprints. That would convince me.

679 experiencedtraveller  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:51:17pm

re: #669 zombie

I'll take you up on this sometime Zombie but gotta run now.

/And shouldn't you be doing something else right now?

680 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:51:30pm

re: #651 Nevergiveup

Josephus was not Roman. He was a Jew. He was a turn coat Jewish General and historian familiar with the peoples and personalities of Judea. He writes of Jesus in passing and has no particular interest in fabricating the story.

Sigh. Josephus NEVER MENTIONED JESUS. See comments #586 and #606 above. It was a forged passage added later.

681 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:52:02pm
682 HelloDare  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:52:04pm

re: #678 Occasional Reader

Or mugshots, with fingerprints. That would convince me.

Have you checked the TMZ website?

683 Boondock St. Bender  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:52:08pm

re: #674 buzzsawmonkey

sorry my bad,he was writing about events of 69 ad.(which was about 30 yrs after the fact.)my history teacher would have smacked me.

684 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:52:48pm

re: #674 buzzsawmonkey

I can't recall now whether his protector/patron lived in Italy proper or Sicily

Sounds like a Sicilian thing to me.

"Josephus, one day I may ask you for a favor... this day may never come, but if it does, I expect you to do this favor immediately and without question..."

685 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:53:03pm

re: #528 yochanan

O.T.

any canadian lizards got info on the beheading in canada? reports don't give the name or ethinic group of the attacker

is he muslim or just nuts?

Isn't that a false dichotomy?

Actually, upthread, there was mention made that the perp is a six-foot, 200 pound guy with a shaved head. Doesn't sound like like your average jihadi. Could be a psycho.

I wonder if Greyhound will be taking down all the billboards they have up around here that say, There's a reason you've never heard of "bus rage."
I guess we have, now.

686 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:53:04pm

re: #667 stymie

It's entirely possible that there would be a written record by government bureaucrats or military officials discussing the event of requesting orders. There are many mundane every records of events. They wouldn't have gone out of their way to carve it in stone on a monument but it's entirley possible that there would be records.

687 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:53:55pm

re: #652 Occasional Reader

speaking on any other subject than your religious faith; would accept as dispositive evidence texts that post-dated the events in question by many decades, that can't be conclusively shown to be written by the people claimed as the authors, and that would already likely have been prone to "massage" in order to make them consistent and to advance an agenda?

(I have to look up "dispositive.")

I appreciate what that paragraph tries to do, OR, but I'd question all the terms. "Many decades"? No, and a few decades doesn't bother me. The authorship questions are interesting but don't land any real blows because the preponderance of evidence is there, as I recall. Prone to cook the books? Well yes, they had some seriously interesting news to report, so enthusiasm per se isn't damaging. Were they written in concert? I thought the evidence there was a firm no, particularly in the case of John, whose gospel was written later, in his visionary (and extremely shrewd) state. Advance an agenda? Well, what do you expect? I have an agenda to convince you that Svetlana Toma is one hot Russian babe, but I trust you won't hold that against me.

688 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:53:57pm

re: #680 zombie

Sigh. Josephus NEVER MENTIONED JESUS. See comments #586 and #606 above. It was a forged passage added later.

I have heard that theory, but I do not subscribe to it. His passing mention of a Jesus of Nazareth was by most accounts his own. There are then added, embellished accounts later added that are probably not his.

689 mean Gene  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:54:16pm

re: #667 stymie

Do you think the Egyptian historians would write about the humiliating defeat and destruction of Pharoah Tutmoses III and his entire army of chariots and horsemen at the hands of the Lord while chasing a group of runaway slaves, or leave that out.

When they defaced the very existence of their OWN previous leaders why would we?
Look at modern day Muslims and the concept of jahilliyya.
The extreme desire to erase anything that might in any way make their own supremacy look less than tip-top is destroyed.
It doesn't matter is it is giant Buddhas in Afghanistan, grave sites of Jews in Turkey or Christian churches all over the Muslim world.
The destruction of all pre-existing religious artifacts is even making a comeback in Egypt itself.
If the Muslim Brotherhood ever gets a majority they have promised to outlaw all pre-Muslim Egyptian art in museums and gift shops.
It's a strong tradition.
Probable originally came from the Pharoes (sp?) of Egypt originally.

690 yochanan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:54:55pm

re: #685 Alberta Oil Peon

Muslims do shave themselves before they go on jihad and he could be a convert so info is inconclusive

691 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:55:05pm
692 Racer X  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:55:14pm

I think I have this figured out.

A dude with funny toes is running from a lightweight dinosaur, probably more like a really large chicken with flat feet. Footprints get captured in mud. No leaves or any other animal tracks on that pile of mud for decades until it hardens into rock.

In the mean time man evolves to have much better looking toes. Dinosaurs evolve to have thinner claw-like feet, and they get much heavier (probably from eating man sandwiches).

Problem solved.

693 zombie  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:55:34pm

re: #679 experiencedtraveller

I'll take you up on this sometime Zombie but gotta run now.

/And shouldn't you be doing something else right now?

Yes, I should! I just needed a short break from all that seminal fluid.

I really gotta wrap this report up now. Thanks for the discussion, everyone!

694 clgood  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:55:48pm

This day and age I'd expect fakes to be better executed. Why he thought someone would buy such perfect sculpts is beyond me.

Of course, if your customer is Dr. Carl Baugh...

695 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:56:05pm

re: #691 buzzsawmonkey

That's a distinct possibility too.

696 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:56:16pm

re: #685 Alberta Oil Peon

Isn't that a false dichotomy?

Actually, upthread, there was mention made that the perp is a six-foot, 200 pound guy with a shaved head. Doesn't sound like like your average jihadi. Could be a psycho.

I wonder if Greyhound will be taking down all the billboards they have up around here that say, There's a reason you've never heard of "bus rage."
I guess we have, now.

When someone offers you a breath mint, just take it.

697 yochanan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:56:54pm

i read three reports in canadian press i would be willing to bet if they attacker wasn't muslim we would know his name by now.

698 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:57:03pm

re: #691 buzzsawmonkey

Who knows what was lost in the various library fires in Egypt. We will never know.

699 Hhar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:57:42pm

291 reine.de.tout

The CT scan is there to look like the Museum had performed due diligence in examing the track. The idea of scanning it is to look at how sediments would be disturbed by a foot pushing into the mud: if you have lines of sediment, they would be deformed by any true track. A carving, on the other hand, would not distort the sediment lines, but would cut cleanly through them and leave the ones underneath undisturbed.

The part of the CT scan they display is meaningless, because the contrast and resolution is so poorly adjusted you can't see anything. It may be a real CT scan, but it is completely useless: a sham, intended to impress, not inform.

Carl Baugh has a history of this sort of shameless nonsense.

700 Boondock St. Bender  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:58:04pm

re: #693 zombie

ack!that was a vision i didn't need!

701 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:58:07pm

re: #687 godfrey

(I have to look up "dispositive.")

It's a pill that you stick up your butt.

702 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 2:59:34pm
703 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:00:10pm

zombie

impartial, forensic or contemporary documentary evidence

Let's examine these. Impartial? Someone disconnected from the events in question. Who was in this position, and if they were disconnected, why is their evidence "stronger"? And why would you trust a marginal reference from some far-flung place? Wouldn't the distance, the remove, bother you? Forensic evidence? Yes, there's lots of forensic evidence lying around from that time.

The synoptic gospels are, on balance, excellent evidence.

704 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:01:00pm

zombie

Cheers, mate. Good discussion. Keep up your superb work with the website.

705 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:01:07pm

Saul, why do you persecute me...re: #681 taxfreekiller

All mind altering drugs are a bad thing, bad now, bad in the past, and bad in the future, man kind has no ability to do much right as he is
the use of drugs make the possibility a vanishing point.

been reading my book?

706 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:01:15pm
707 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:01:33pm

re: #696 rawmuse

When someone offers you a breath mint, just take it.

Agreed. Learning to "palm" a pill is a valuable skill.

708 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:01:35pm

re: #701 Occasional Reader

lol

At least you're not encouraging me to be anti-emetic.

709 rlevitin  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:01:36pm

Hey everyone, in case it hasn't been posted:

VIDEO of a witness describing the beheading on a Greyhound bus in Manitoba, Canada.

(Link is the second one under the headline)

Friggin disgusting.

710 yochanan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:01:49pm

fake or faux your pick.

711 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:02:07pm
712 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:02:08pm

re: #706 buzzsawmonkey

The card catalogs, for one thing.

Also the B'Harni children's tapes, with actual Dinosaurs.

/

713 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:02:19pm

Whoa! Forget that Saul thing- dunno how that happened to still be in their from a post I never made...

714 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:02:22pm

re: #703 godfrey

Yes, there's lots of forensic evidence lying around from that time.

Forensic evidence of the existence of Jesus of Nazareth?

Like what?

715 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:02:40pm
716 yochanan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:02:52pm

saw too many nut cases and drunks on the bus.

717 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:03:03pm

re: #706 buzzsawmonkey

You know, I've read about that library and Alexandria, and being a book lover and enthusiastic antiquarian, I am still pissed that someone burned it down.

718 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:03:09pm

re: #706 buzzsawmonkey

The card catalogs, for one thing.

Did they use the Library of Pharaoh system?

719 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:03:25pm

Going Going Gone: Manny does to la la land!

[Link: espn.go.com...]

Happy day in Yankee land

720 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:03:25pm

End of the world in 4 years.
Stock your mountain cabin today.

721 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:03:26pm

re: #714 Occasional Reader

I was being sarcastic there.

722 Bill K.  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:03:51pm

Hmmm! I wonder why the cave paintings by our remote ancestors showed, the mammoth, giant bison, huge deer but no T. Rex or anything like it?

How much scientific evidence do we have to throw out to assume that man and the dinosaurs co-existed? Carbon dating for sure, geological evidence without a doubt, continental drift - are you kidding and on and on. A book could be written about this and many have.

While we're at it, why not argue that the earth is only 6000 years old. The Bible is all the proof we need. Right?

723 jorline  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:04:21pm

re: #670 HelloDare

Take your pick: 220 DATES FOR THE END OF THE WORLD.

Great link HD...thanks...I didn't see stymie's.

724 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:05:12pm

re: #711 taxfreekiller

tfk, did you hear that Cornyn has demanded/requested/suggested that Bush pardon Ramos and Compean?

725 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:05:50pm
726 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:06:03pm

re: #611 Salem

Here is a video where a witness describes the mad man as either Asian or Native....and here the article.

No name, etc., yet, for the perp or his victim. I was in shock when I heard about it earlier.

727 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:06:18pm

re: #724 OldLineTexan

tfk, did you hear that Cornyn has demanded/requested/suggested that Bush pardon Ramos and Compean?

'bout time somebody heated him up about this

728 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:06:42pm
729 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:06:42pm
730 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:07:18pm

re: #722 Bill K.

Hmmm! I wonder why the cave paintings by our remote ancestors showed, the mammoth, giant bison, huge deer but no T. Rex or anything like it?

Too busy running from dinosaurs to crush pigments and blend them with animal fat?

Dino fat is so tasty (mmm, the skin crisps just like chicken) that there was no fat left?

Artists evolved rather later?

///////////

731 Charles  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:07:29pm

By the way ... Alvis Delk.

That's one of the best names I've ever seen. Sounds like a character in an Elmore Leonard book.

732 Alouette  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:07:32pm

re: #726 NY Nana

Here is a video where a witness describes the mad man as either Asian or Native....and here the article.

No name, etc., yet, for the perp or his victim. I was in shock when I heard about it earlier.

It's the Eskimos! I keep telling everybody. Global Warming is destroying their native habitat.

733 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:07:43pm

re: #718 Occasional Reader

Did they use the Library of Pharaoh system?

Fiction would be under "eyeball", history would be "bird", "wavy line" would be mystery, etc.

734 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:07:46pm

Watch the Skies! For Dinosaurs! In Texas!

735 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:07:49pm

re: #729 taxfreekiller

No, but we have a letter writing deal going on to the Judges who would not over turn the convictions, where did you hear that.?

Full pardons, back pay, expunge records, etc...

736 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:08:08pm

re: #729 taxfreekiller

No, but we have a letter writing deal going on to the Judges who would not over turn the convictions, where did you hear that.?

Morning show on AM700 in Houston.

I intend to call his office tomorrow and ask for a copy of the letter.

737 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:08:27pm

re: #690 yochanan

Muslims do shave themselves before they go on jihad and he could be a convert so info is inconclusive

I thought the description was bald, not necessarily shaved.
He might not be Muslim , but it does fit the M.O

738 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:08:51pm

re: #731 Charles

By the way ... Alvis Delk.

That's one of the best names I've ever seen. Sounds like a character in an Elmore Leonard book.

That's kind of how I feel about "Placido Domingo". C'mon, Gabriel Garcia Marquez made that one up.

739 Charles  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:08:55pm

re: #734 Salem

Watch the Skies! For Dinosaurs! In Texas!

I never knew the chupacabra was actually a mini-pterodactyl. Fascinating.

740 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:09:43pm

re: #737 opnion

I thought the description was bald, not necessarily shaved.
He might not be Muslim , but it does fit the M.O

Euphemism in Europe for middle Easterners is "Asian". Could same be true north o' the border?

741 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:09:48pm

re: #737 opnion

The report from Canada press had him as "aboriginal", which is what they (correctly) refer to as their natives.

742 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:10:11pm

re: #710 yochanan

fake or faux your pick.

I call Pseudopod.

743 Capitalist Tool  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:10:45pm

re: #741 rawmuse

The report from Canada press had him as "aboriginal", which is what they (correctly) refer to as their natives.

The report said the VICTIM was aboriginal.

744 Charles  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:11:25pm

Here's the Alvis Delk page at the Creation Evidence Museum (not the same operation as the Creation Museum):

[Link: www.creationevidence.org...]

745 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:11:25pm

re: #573 jimc

You can use common sense, you can have an opinion, and common people can debate about their opinions and throw around "facts" but nothing should be thrown out just because it "doesn't fit". If anything a scientist should be eager to find out how this thing exists, be it fake or some anomaly. But my original point is that it is not very scientific to reject something outright without test because it doesn't fit your established viewpoint, that is called dogma and is faith not science.

Yes there are certain truths but then there are certainly things that were once thought to be true only to be wrong. If you think not, then you're not looking hard enough....

In a nutshell: extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. That humans and dinosaurs made contemporary footprints in Cretaceous limestone is an extraordinary claim, indeed. The provenance of this specimen is very suspect, and it's currently in the possession of a "museum" that is dedicated to the proposition that it purportedly supports. Talk about a conflict of interest.

Take the rock. Pass it through a diamond saw, and polish the cut surface. If those prints are actual impressions, made in the soft sediment, the microstructures in the sediment will be deformed, but still continuous. If the prints were carved, or chemically etched, or sandblasted, the microstructures will be truncated.

746 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:11:25pm

re: #743 Capitalist Tool

The report said the VICTIM was aboriginal.

I thought the victim was dead?

747 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:11:29pm

re: #743 Capitalist Tool

The report said the VICTIM was aboriginal.

I guess that does make a difference...

748 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:11:48pm

re: #703 godfrey

zombie


Let's examine these. Impartial? Someone disconnected from the events in question. Who was in this position, and if they were disconnected, why is their evidence "stronger"? And why would you trust a marginal reference from some far-flung place? Wouldn't the distance, the remove, bother you? Forensic evidence? Yes, there's lots of forensic evidence lying around from that time.

The synoptic gospels are, on balance, excellent evidence.

On the basis of the same tests; does the Koran constitute "excellent evidence"?

If not, why not?

749 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:12:13pm

re: #697 yochanan

i read three reports in canadian press i would be willing to bet if they attacker wasn't muslim we would know his name by now.

I think that you are spot on. They would rush out a description other than Muslim. Think about it, the victim appeared 'Aboriginal"
They put that out on the first pass.
He may not be Muslim. but if it turns out that his name is Mohammad, I will just bet that the last name isn't Kelly

750 Charles  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:12:53pm

(Oh, I see Hhar already posted it.)

751 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:13:23pm

re: #732 Alouette

It's the Eskimos! I keep telling everybody. Global Warming is destroying their native habitat.

Forget your sarc mark? ;)

Got any South Park Eskimos?

Global warming? Global schwarming!

[No schwarma was harmed in posting this message.]

752 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:14:05pm

re: #719 Nevergiveup

Crap! I thought Manny was going to the Yankees.

753 jorline  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:14:08pm

re: #731 Charles

By the way ... Alvis Delk.

That's one of the best names I've ever seen. Sounds like a character in an Elmore Leonard book.

Wasn't Alvis Delk a singer with Sha Na Na...middle purple shirt.

/

754 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:14:45pm

re: #748 Occasional Reader

I'll be glad to tackle that question, OR, when I've done the homework on the Koran. There's an upcoming conference on the textual history of the Koran at a prominent American university this coming spring. That, coupled with a fair bit of reading, should give me enough to make a respectable stab at an answer that compares them. Even then, it would only be a stab.

755 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:15:32pm

re: #726 NY Nana

Here is a video where a witness describes the mad man as either Asian or Native....and here the article.

No name, etc., yet, for the perp or his victim. I was in shock when I heard about it earlier.

Hmmm. I suppose we'll never know, though if there are no repeats, terrorism would seem unlikely. SJS, maybe. Funny how when something like this happens, psycho or Muslim are the first two things that spring to mind.

756 Nevergiveup  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:15:40pm

re: #752 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Crap! I thought Manny was going to the Yankees.

Getting him OUT of Boston is almost as good. Maybe better. We don't have to pay him. And he is out of the American League!

757 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:16:12pm

un-imaginable everyone runs while someone is murdered

758 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:16:25pm
759 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:16:34pm

re: #741 rawmuse

The report from Canada press had him as "aboriginal", which is what they (correctly) refer to as their natives.

Thats right, just as the American Indian is our aboriginal people (First here) The point is that the term is pretty specific about the victim, yet you don't hear something like "Caucasian Male' to describe the murderer.

760 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:16:42pm
761 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:17:09pm

re: #749 opnion

IIRC, he would not be named, etc., until charges are laid. He is still being questioned, it seems. I do not envy the police.

762 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:18:21pm

re: #761 NY Nana

Voldemort?

763 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:18:42pm

re: #739 Charles

I never knew the chupacabra was actually a mini-pterodactyl. Fascinating.

I reckon that's more plausible than the idea that they are the bloodhound pets of visiting "grey" aliens. Though not by much...

764 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:20:12pm
765 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:20:15pm

re: #761 NY Nana

IIRC, he would not be named, etc., until charges are laid. He is still being questioned, it seems. I do not envy the police.

Yeah, I can see that they might withold his name, but they could have been much more descriptive.

766 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:20:31pm

What if Iraq works? by VDH

If lefties are asking this question only now, man, are they ever behind.

767 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:20:52pm

re: #757 willowone

The passengers were told to get off as fast as they could, and the bus driver fixed the controls so that the monster could not get off the bus. The passengers, in such a chaotic situation actually helped to sudue the perp.

See this article.

768 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:20:56pm
769 Racer X  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:21:06pm

re: #757 willowone

un-imaginable everyone runs while someone is murdered

200 lb crazy bald guy stabs someone like 50 times, then starts sawing his head off.

Yeah, I'm heading for the exit.

770 Bobblehead  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:21:15pm

OT...Iowahawk on the tire inflation controversy. Hee, hee. Funny as always.

771 opnion  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:21:22pm

re: #761 NY Nana

IIRC, he would not be named, etc., until charges are laid. He is still being questioned, it seems. I do not envy the police.


If they bring in an Arabic interpreter, I will be suspicious.

772 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:21:23pm
773 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:21:59pm

re: #731 Charles

By the way ... Alvis Delk.

That's one of the best names I've ever seen. Sounds like a character in an Elmore Leonard book.

Alvis is a cool name. Close to Elvis, yet not.

Delk is not uncommon. I went to school with a girl named Delk. Trivia: She was a pitcher for the girl's softball team; her boyfriend was the baseball team catcher. They decided to play catch, and she burned one in and broke his thumb. ;)

774 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:22:27pm

re: #773 OldLineTexan

Wasn't Buck Owens's real name "Alvis"?

775 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:22:39pm

re: #767 NY Nana

thank you i will look , i just watched the candaian expalin it. still christ, i know everyone was afraid i just wished let's roll might have sung out .
for the dead mans sake

776 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:22:53pm
777 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:23:18pm

saying that i wasn't there and i'm sure it was so shocking probably everyone was stunned into disbelief and in-action

778 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:23:51pm

re: #765 opnion

From my time spent in both Canada and the UK, they do not give out the info until they lay charges, etc. And I imagine that the passengers are still in shock at what they saw.

I would hope that they are still being counseled rather than questioned by the press.

779 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:24:17pm
780 willowone  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:24:33pm

re: #769 Racer X
racer, i know, i'm just sad for the dead man.

781 Macker  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:25:41pm

Hello folks, I'm back from the EGD. Last thing I remember was their putting the mouth guard into my mouth...next thing was a gentle nudge on the arm saying "wake up...it's over."

Dang.

782 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:25:42pm
783 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:25:54pm
784 jorline  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:26:16pm

re: #763 Salem

I reckon that's more plausible than the idea that they are the bloodhound pets of visiting "grey" aliens. Though not by much...

I live in south TX and the legend of the chupacabra is strongly believed...never met a goat it didn't like...perhaps we could catch a few and introduce them to several Arab goat infested countries.

785 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:26:19pm

re: #760 taxfreekiller

Thanks for saving me the steps. Here I am with teh interwebz in mah hands, and I did not think to just check his site first.

786 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:26:40pm

Damn but this is an interesting thread. Into the favorites...

787 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:26:59pm

re: #774 godfrey

Wasn't Buck Owens's real name "Alvis"?

Yep, but I had to look that up. ;)

788 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:28:33pm

re: #784 jorline

I live in south TX and the legend of the chupacabra is strongly believed...never met a goat it didn't like...perhaps we could catch a few and introduce them to several Arab goat infested countries.

Great, now the single males REALLY won't have anything to do on Saturday night!

/great bit by some comedian...there you are with sand in your shorts, no girlfriend, no masturbation, no porn..yeah, I'd be pissed

789 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:29:23pm

re: #781 Macker

Hello folks, I'm back from the EGD. Last thing I remember was their putting the mouth guard into my mouth...next thing was a gentle nudge on the arm saying "wake up...it's over."

Dang.

Surgery and stuff like it (being knocked out) is freakin' spooky.

790 godfrey  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:29:26pm

re: #787 OldLineTexan

I love that old Buck Owens stuff. That early live album he did in London? Don Rich rocks out at one point, and Buck is just stunned and laughing.

791 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:29:35pm

re: #775 willowone

In the case of a madman who had decapitated someone, I think that they were heroic in even trying to tackle him while he still had the knife, and that the bus driver did the proper thing in getting the bus emptied, and the monster locked in the bus..this was on the ground, not in the air, where the men involved saved countless lives, and were heroes unlike any we ever knew. I think they realized that they had no chance, but tried..

I would hope the driver and the ones who helped would be commended. I wonder if anyone who was on that bus will have trouble sleeping tonight, and for many nights ahead, sadly.

792 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:30:01pm

re: #783 buzzsawmonkey

Obama advocates inflating tires to combat the energy crisis, but is photographed riding a bicycle with an obviously flat tire.

Of course, to be fair: It wasn't a gasoline-powered bicycle.

793 phoenixgirl  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:30:32pm

re: #781 Macker

{macker}

794 J.S.  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:30:48pm

re: #778 NY Nana

There have been some additional gruesome details (although still yet to be confirmed through a police report...but it's been leaked to the press that some of the witnesses say the victim was "gutted" and that there was cannibalism. Also suggestions that the reason for the RCMP not interviewing the suspect (perp) after over 12 hours in police custody was because (it's been suggested) that the perp is "bonkers" or totally incoherent -- that is, the perp is not able to be talked to -- in a delusional state...). The police are praising the people on the bus (including the bus driver) for doing their very best, under such horrific circumstances...

795 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:30:59pm

re: #784 jorline

I live in south TX and the legend of the chupacabra is strongly believed...never met a goat it didn't like...perhaps we could catch a few and introduce them to several Arab goat infested countries.

Texas...It's a whole other country.

796 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:31:36pm

re: #690 yochanan

Muslims do shave themselves before they go on jihad and he could be a convert so info is inconclusive

I don't believe it's the big head that gets shaved. ;>)

True, though, you can't rule out a convert. You'd think the perp would be hollering "Allhu Ackbar", though. Seems to be de rigeur.

I'm thinking the guy's an alumnus of Crowbar U.

797 OldLineTexan  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:32:30pm

re: #795 Salem

Texas...It's a whole other country.

Maybe the chupacabra is just some jihadis that snuck over the border and got distracted by all the purdy goats.

/I do not know why Mahmoud does not answer. And his credit card bills are for chocolate and nylons!

798 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:32:42pm

re: #781 Macker

How do you feel?

799 kawfytawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:33:19pm

OT

Since the House voted 213/212 to adjourn for vacation yesterday. How can I find out how my Congressman voted? I could not find it on the floor summary....anyone know? or does anyone have a list?

I am really ticked off about this....I really wanted them to stay and work on the energy bill until it was hashed out.

800 Racer X  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:34:01pm

re: #780 willowone

racer, i know, i'm just sad for the dead man.

Yep. Me too.

801 Racer X  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:36:43pm

re: #799 kawfytawk

OT

Since the House voted 213/212 to adjourn for vacation yesterday. How can I find out how my Congressman voted? I could not find it on the floor summary....anyone know? or does anyone have a list?

I am really ticked off about this....I really wanted them to stay and work on the energy bill until it was hashed out.

I heard 9 democrats voted with every republican to stay in session to hammer out an energy bill.

802 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:37:59pm

re: #794 J.S.

OMG....I still feel like it is a nightmare..I agree with you. It makes sense.

In hindsight, I have a feeling that he has a history of mental problems. And yes, the bus driver and the passengers are heroes. They did, in my estimation, the most appropriate thing, and they had so little time to even think. In a closed space? Unimaginable.

I wonder if the RCMP and the Provincial police were able to contact the families of the victim and the perp. I cannot even imagine how they would feel..

803 jelo  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:39:06pm

re: #796 Alberta Oil Peon

Crowbar? I saw Crowbar in "76".

804 Hhar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:43:52pm

Is it just me, or does Alvis Delk sound like somebody out of a Sinclair Lewis novel?

Chum Frink
Virgil Gunch
Elmer Gantry
Vida Sherwin
Alvis Delk
Lucas Prout
Seneca Douane
Leora Tozer


He fits right in.

Childish, I know, but striking.

805 Hhar  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:45:19pm

Oops. Never read Elmore Leonard.

Now I'll have to.

806 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:48:32pm

re: #794 J.S.

More info, etc., from the CBC...I usually go to CTV, but the CBC has excellent coverage this time, videos also.

A 6-year old boy witnessed it. He was a passenger. I cannot even begin to imagine..

There is excellent counseling being given.

807 Thanos  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:51:33pm

re: #799 kawfytawk

OT

Since the House voted 213/212 to adjourn for vacation yesterday. How can I find out how my Congressman voted? I could not find it on the floor summary....anyone know? or does anyone have a list?

I am really ticked off about this....I really wanted them to stay and work on the energy bill until it was hashed out.

It was probably a non-roll call vote.

808 J.S.  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:51:51pm

re: #802 NY Nana

Yes, a hideous nightmare...(like some scene from hell-- in the midst of no where; on a dark, deserted road; late at night; with a raving lunatic inside the bus, threatening to come out; and only a handful of brave souls -- a couple of guys and a truck driver -- armed with crowbars and tire-arms to keep the monster at bay, locking the lunatic inside the bus so he wouldn't go on a further rampage...Later on, apparently, the lunatic broke through the bus's front window, left a huge gaping hole in the window, in his mad attempt to escape -- but that's when he was apprehended...)

809 kawfytawk  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 3:58:32pm

re: #807 Thanos

dangit....my congressman and his cronies who answer the phone can never be straight forward....so I doubt I will get a truthful answer as to his vote. I have repeatedly let his office know that he should stay until the work was done....sure to fall on deaf ears

810 Kenneth  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:09:02pm

re: #466 USASupport

Hypothetically speaking, IF it's proven genuine, then I would have to reconsider a whole bunch of things. Including, how is it all the other fossils of dinosaurs have been dated to 60 million years or more old, while all fossils of homo sapiens date to no more than 100 thousand years or so old? That contradiction would remain and is in no way challenged by this obvious hoax.

What's your point?

811 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:10:56pm

re: #759 opnion

Thats right, just as the American Indian is our aboriginal people (First here) The point is that the term is pretty specific about the victim, yet you don't hear something like "Caucasian Male' to describe the murderer.

Well, I watched a couple of the witnesses interviewed on CTV videos linked here, and the best witness stated that the perp looked to be native or Chinese. He didn't mention the ethnicity of the victim; just said it was a small young man who was either sleeping or listening to his headphones when suddenly attacked.

As to why everybody ran? When you have a large powerful man, armed with a sharp knife, and he's already demonstrated a willingness to use it, that's the only smart thing to do.

We need concealed-carry laws in Canada.

812 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:11:42pm

re: #808 J.S.

When something of this magnitude occurs, you get the real measure of the man, and in this case, under such dire circumstances? They were heroes of the first order.

It is the 6-year old I am the most worried for.

I imagine that tomorrow there may be more information released.

And yes, the isolation of the are was scary, and yet it could have been so much worse, if the men had not reacted so swiftly, and under such danger to themselves. G-d bless them. I bet they do not even consider themselves to be true heroes.

Is it time for trains and buses to use metal detectors?

813 ubercheesehead  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:17:08pm

If this turns out to be a forgery (clever or otherwise) it will certainly not be the first. If it turns out to be authentic this will certainly make things interesting.

814 Mardukhai  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:17:55pm

Okay, it's real. Alley Oop told me so -- He saw Dino step on Fred Flintstone's foot.

(For the young'uns, Alley Oop was a cartoon character, a caveman whose ride was "a genu-ine dino-sour" and the subject from one of the great gag tunes of the early rock era, "Alley Oop-oop, oop-oop, oop-oop...")

815 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:18:29pm

re: #811 Alberta Oil Peon

Take a look at the articles...everyone did not run, and there was a 6-year old who saw it all. Concealed weapons are not always the answer. They can do more damage in such an enclosed environment...and 10 men shooting with others in the way, including a child? G-d help us.

The bus driver and the men who acted so quickly did exactly what was right.

816 jorline  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:18:54pm

re: #788 OldLineTexan

Great, now the single males REALLY won't have anything to do on Saturday night!

/great bit by some comedian...there you are with sand in your shorts, no girlfriend, no masturbation, no porn..yeah, I'd be pissed

LMAO...It's Saturday Night and I Ain't Got Nobody...I Got Some Money Cause I Just Got Paid.....

817 J.S.  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:19:20pm

re: #812 NY Nana

I think they were heroes -- the media also showed the 6 year old (he was re-boarding another bus with his mom) -- I hope they can overcome this trauma...(one of the witnesses says he's having nightmares.) (I guess we'll find out more by tomorrow regarding the perp). And, maybe metal detectors for bus passengers would be prudent...

818 Naso Tang  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:23:01pm

I saw a footprint in the clouds once. Just once. I never saw another. Strange.

819 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:33:41pm

re: #817 J.S.

Yes, they fit the definition to a T.

There were professional councilors and ministers, etc., to help. I do not think I could sleep well with the images...and I am a retired RN who dealt with gunshot wounds in the ER in the middle of the night nearly 50 years ago, in Brooklyn. But this?

On an emotional level, this is very hard to deal with. I have a 6-year old granddaughter who remembers everything!

Some of my kids, and a daughter in law, were in Manhattan on 9/11, and so was my brother in law.

The passengers on the bus will soon be forgotten, sadly. Look at how a massive disaster like 9/11 seems to fade away. But I hope there will be recognition given to the heroes on the Greyhound bus.

Tomorrow's info should be interesting as to the perp and his background.

I think we are all coming to a time when metal detectors on buses, trains, etc., will be common place. Sad.

Dinner time...

820 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:48:23pm

Too bad no one has invented the mental detector, yet. Metal detectors on buses, however, would be sad. Why not protect everyone everywhere from knives too, then?

821 hillbilly geek  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:51:11pm

Obviously, you folks haven't been to the secret wing of the Smithsonian Museum... you, know, the one with the fossilized VW. Otherwise you'd be more respectful.
=-D

822 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 4:52:57pm

this foot print fossil is a fake. should be easy to prove that.
the convenient dinosaur foot print on top of the really fake looking human foot print is just too staged and contrived to be believed.

823 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:10:10pm

re: #348 badger1970

Yes, that looks as 'bout as real as a three dollar bill and I fail to understand what these hoaxers are trying to accomplish with such bad "evidence". Dino preceded man by millions of years- there's no disputing that, but does it call for bashing people that may believe that man may be younger than we think we are?

Evolution theory works great as long as humans aren't thrown into the equation because there hasn't been evidence showing links from ape-like to human-like to human. If we are nothing more than an event in the evolutionary process why should we even bother trying to better ourselves following a belief system and hoping for the best after we breathe our last?

I don't take everything in the Bible literally and frankly it took billions of years for the creation of earth and it's ecosystem, fault me if you will but I fail to see what is wrong to believe that man is as old as a the number of "begats" (give or take a few).

Umm...the evidence is vast and undeniable that humans and great apes diverged from common ancestors; the genes of the species in question are filled with thousands of cases of such evidence. It's called artifactual retroviral DNA sequences.

As Charles has previously posted.

[Link: www.newyorker.com...]

824 Salem  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:12:38pm

A good thing an atheist didn't find that footprint first, I'll say that. I know I would have taken the hammer to it. For my own sanity, I've got to maintain my godless little fantasy worldview where the Flintstones isn't based on a true story.

825 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:17:25pm

re: #354 straitcircle

Yeah, we evolved out of monkeys or chimps and the ones still here today were all left behind by us. OK I see that logic. Did Darwin experiment with psychedelic plants when he was doing his vacation on some of those islands? Now where did the chimp come from? The butterfly or the mosquito? It surely wasn't the platypus!

The Chimpanzee, the Bonobo, the Gorilla and the Orangutan all diverged from the same species line that produced humans, as differing times within the last few million years. The proof is in the genomes of the respective species:

[Link: www.newyorker.com...]

BTW: Monotremes (egg-laying mammals) such as the platypus and the spiny anteater are indeed closer genetic relatives to both humans and the great apes than are the insects.

It sounds to me like you've been unwisely mixing your peyote buttons and your psilocybin mushrooms. But I guess such errors of judgment are understandable when one is tripping on too much acid.

826 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:19:33pm

re: #362 Peacekeeper

Evolution is like saying the monkey flew out of its' own ass.

Remind me to never send you for groceries.

827 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:22:19pm

re: #379 Capitalist Tool

It's just a test to determine the truly worthy...

Or the truly credulous and gullible.

828 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:25:15pm

re: #362 Peacekeeper

Evolution is like saying the monkey flew out of its' own ass.

straitcircle: I want to start a World University with that quote as a Motto!

I'm sure that you could find plenty of people moronic enough to attend; just advertise with the Discovery Institute.

829 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:39:07pm

re: #405 jimc

I love it. So called "Science" minded people immediately rejecting this. Hysterical. You people are no more interested in science than a Democrat is interested in helping others.

A real scientist would withhold judgment until independent study or verification was done. A hack rejects it first and then seeks to confirm his rejection anyway possible....I see mostly hacks here.

You actually believe that this unintelligently-designed crapola, sold to a creationist museum eight years after its supposed discovery by some dude who need to pay his hospital bills, could be for real?

I see a dumb person.

830 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:44:06pm

re: #435 jimc

Who is the troll? I haven't read all 400+ comments but I'll take your word that some trolls are here.

Not only a troll, but an oblivious one...;~)

831 Josephine  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:46:07pm

re: #781 Macker

Hello folks, I'm back from the EGD. Last thing I remember was their putting the mouth guard into my mouth...next thing was a gentle nudge on the arm saying "wake up...it's over."

Dang.

You are lucky.

For my most recent endoscopy, they didn't sedate me enough and didn't wait after spraying the freezing, so I felt and gagged on the tube the whole way down. It was horrible.

Canada, eh?

832 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:48:44pm

re: #453 jimc

Wow reading comprehension. I said "rejecting". Being skeptical is fine, however rejecting outright is not being skeptical, it is being dogmatic. See the difference? I'm not arguing this is real or fake, just taking the appropriate stance of not dismissing a data point before it is even studied by the skeptical. You can have your opinion that it is fake, but opinions are scientific facts....

The point that access to the specimen is limited is a problem but that also does not mean it must be rejected, just doesn't count until it is examined more thoroughly and by several independent parties (impartiality would be next to impossible though).

I've heard that someone has a video of dwarves fellating unicorns beneath the mountains of the moon. We cannot dismiss this possibility out of hand; it requires us to rocket there and excavate.

833 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:54:28pm

re: #484 jimc

Oh, ok, so there have never been any discoveries that turned established scientific thought on its head? Hmmmm....ok

Not in a regressive direction.

834 David IV of Georgia  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:57:39pm

re: #3 zombie

That is the fakest thing I've ever seen.

I was at the Paluxy River back in 1969 when these tracks were first discovered. It is what it is. There are dozens of tracks there. When cut apart, it is seen that the rock strata indents where the tracks are. If this is too much for you, go to Glen Rose, Texas and see for yourself. Then object.

835 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 5:58:40pm

re: #509 jimc

re: #425 Sharmuta

Ok, so let's be absolutely legalistic about a potential discovery. Has there ever been fossils removed from their original site that were accepted as genuine? If so then this premise is false....

They weren't removed from their original sites by rednecks who stuck them in their garages for eight years and only sold them to a creation museum when they fell off their ladders at home, cracked their skulls, and needed to pay medical bills.

836 David IV of Georgia  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:00:36pm

re: #835 Salamantis

When I saw them they were attached to terra firma.

837 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:03:43pm

re: #573 jimc

You can use common sense, you can have an opinion, and common people can debate about their opinions and throw around "facts" but nothing should be thrown out just because it "doesn't fit". If anything a scientist should be eager to find out how this thing exists, be it fake or some anomaly. But my original point is that it is not very scientific to reject something outright without test because it doesn't fit your established viewpoint, that is called dogma and is faith not science.

Yes there are certain truths but then there are certainly things that were once thought to be true only to be wrong. If you think not, then you're not looking hard enough....

If you think that this hoax fits into such a category then you aren't thinking hard enough.

838 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:04:06pm

re: #836 David IV of Georgia

When I saw them they were attached to terra firma.

And carved into it, too.

839 David IV of Georgia  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:07:12pm

re: #838 Salamantis

And carved into it, too.

No evidence of carving that I could see. Perhaps a monitor lizard with 2' feet? I'm not trying to defend any position, I'm just saying what I saw. But then again, I was rather young. Make your own conclusion.

840 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:07:25pm

re: #582 stymie

No Darwin wasn't stupid, just mistaken. Because the Lord created the world with apparent age back in 11,013 BC, this allowed crackpot theories like evolution to appear possible. Another time truth-the flood of Noah's day was in 4990BC, which brings the 7,000 anniversary of the Flood to 2,011AD. This will be the last year of Earth's history. May 21, 2011 is probably the very last day, in that that is 7,000 years TO THE VERY DAY that Noah was shut into the ark.

Wow. Just wow. Someone has actually inseminated Young-Earth Creationism, complete with a Lying God, with Mayan Calendar End-Time Mythology. Talk about an unlikely cross-pollenization...

But to be technical, you're one year off; it's all supposed to end in 2012...

841 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:08:43pm

re: #839 David IV of Georgia

[Link: www.talkorigins.org...]

842 Straitcircle  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:12:21pm

re: #825 Salamantis


"They focussed on chimpanzees, our closest relatives. Chimpanzees are easily infected by the AIDS virus, but it never makes them sick. That has remained one of the most frustrating mysteries of the epidemic." -- Michael Specter

Michael Specter is not a scientist, he is a reporter at a liberal rag.


I read academic studies, this is a semi-literate NY rag. This piece is written as journalism, and in addition this article's topic is about the easy access of 'mainly' students, i.e. people that have a little knowledge, who can create viruses by connecting to various online academic databases...and then applying their biological knowledge. And you tried to sell it to me as some sort of academic work by some by-line quote?


Look scientists do not 'jump' to conclusions, which probably explains your passionate defense of evolution. New research, which cannot be gleaned in a New York rag, apparently is showing signs of a much more complicated system than previously thought. You might want to hold-off the 'whole world is flat-shaped' mentality. People fought passionately about that supposed 'truth' only to die and never see the wonderful earth curvature from a Boeing 747 flight. So you are excused. Just like the massive global warming of the 900-1200 AD in the northern hemisphere, or its appending little-ice age of Europe beginning in the first decades of the sixteenth century, today's mass hysteria of Gorebot Warming has no understanding of this historicism, and is the same as evolutionary proponents today on the web who have no idea of the complexity and arguments of recent DNA studies. It is only going to get more complicated in the coming decades and centuries. I would say there is such a thing as mutation but it has its definable limits. Most scientists, that are real scientists do not jump to conclusions, and only suggest further inquiry. This NY rag is bias, journalist and persuasive industry. It is part of 'news', as in the British sense.

843 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:17:33pm

re: #635 godfrey

Nonsense. The synoptic gospels are the testimonies of eyewitnesses. Denying their value as evidence is absurd.

Jesus existed.

None of the synoptic gospels were written by the apostles whose names they have as titles, and none of them were written within a half'century of Jesus' purported death. The gospel that most closely dates to that era is the Gospel of Thomas, and it was excised by the Council of Nicea.

844 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:27:40pm

re: #762 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Voldemort?

Missed that one...hardly. This is tragically for real.

845 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:31:17pm

re: #842 Straitcircle

"They focussed on chimpanzees, our closest relatives. Chimpanzees are easily infected by the AIDS virus, but it never makes them sick. That has remained one of the most frustrating mysteries of the epidemic." -- Michael Specter

Michael Specter is not a scientist, he is a reporter at a liberal rag.

I read academic studies, this is a semi-literate NY rag. This piece is written as journalism, and in addition this article's topic is about the easy access of 'mainly' students, i.e. people that have a little knowledge, who can create viruses by connecting to various online academic databases...and then applying their biological knowledge. And you tried to sell it to me as some sort of academic work by some by-line quote?

The scientists upon which he reports are not reporters at liberal rags; they are highly respected scienctists employed by highly respected insititutions. Al ad hominem is bad enough; directing it at the messenger rather than the message sorce is even worse.

Look scientists do not 'jump' to conclusions, which probably explains your passionate defense of evolution. New research, which cannot be gleaned in a New York rag, apparently is showing signs of a much more complicated system than previously thought. You might want to hold-off the 'whole world is flat-shaped' mentality. People fought passionately about that supposed 'truth' only to die and never see the wonderful earth curvature from a Boeing 747 flight. So you are excused. Just like the massive global warming of the 900-1200 AD in the northern hemisphere, or its appending little-ice age of Europe beginning in the first decades of the sixteenth century, today's mass hysteria of Gorebot Warming has no understanding of this historicism, and is the same as evolutionary proponents today on the web who have no idea of the complexity and arguments of recent DNA studies. It is only going to get more complicated in the coming decades and centuries. I would say there is such a thing as mutation but it has its definable limits. Most scientists, that are real scientists do not jump to conclusions, and only suggest further inquiry. This NY rag is bias, journalist and persuasive industry. It is part of 'news', as in the British sense.

You are simply demonstrating how your emotion has overwhelmed your intellection to the point of desperate straw-grasping when you attempt to impugn such a study. Do you even realize what the clincher is?

There are three billion base pairs in the human genome. Artifactual retroviral DNA sequences did not evolve as part of their hosts' genome' rather, they were spliced in by externally sourced retroviral infections. For genomic matters to be as they demonstrably are, we would not only have to believe that humans and great apes came down with the same retroviral infections, at the same times, thousands of different times, during a period millions of years ago when we cannot find a single fossil skeleton of each, we would also have to believe that, just coincidentally, all of these separate infections spliced into separate three-billion-base-pair genomes in precisely the identically isomorphic locations, thousands of times over.

The evidence is statistically overwhelming. There is vastly less of a probabilty that you could buy one ticket to each lottery on the planet for the rest of a long lifetime and win them all while travelling weekly to Las Vegas and rolling 1200 boxcars in a row every time than that thousands of identical artifactual retroviral DNA sequences just happened to splice, at precisely the same times (measured by sequence degradation) into exactly isomorphic locations in the 3 billion base pair human and great ape genomes in the absence of divergence from a common ancestor.

And these are indeed artifactual retroviral DNA sequences. Their parent viruses have, in some cases, been reconstructed from them.

846 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:32:28pm

re: #820 Salem

It appears that the Canadians are already considering metal detectors for buses. Good on them.

847 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:33:52pm

re: #845 Salamantis

With new and improved formatting!

re: #842 Straitcircle

"They focussed on chimpanzees, our closest relatives. Chimpanzees are easily infected by the AIDS virus, but it never makes them sick. That has remained one of the most frustrating mysteries of the epidemic." -- Michael Specter

Michael Specter is not a scientist, he is a reporter at a liberal rag.

I read academic studies, this is a semi-literate NY rag. This piece is written as journalism, and in addition this article's topic is about the easy access of 'mainly' students, i.e. people that have a little knowledge, who can create viruses by connecting to various online academic databases...and then applying their biological knowledge. And you tried to sell it to me as some sort of academic work by some by-line quote?

The scientists upon which he reports are not reporters at liberal rags; they are highly respected scienctists employed by highly respected insititutions. An ad hominem is bad enough; directing it at the messenger rather than the message source is even worse.

Look scientists do not 'jump' to conclusions, which probably explains your passionate defense of evolution. New research, which cannot be gleaned in a New York rag, apparently is showing signs of a much more complicated system than previously thought. You might want to hold-off the 'whole world is flat-shaped' mentality. People fought passionately about that supposed 'truth' only to die and never see the wonderful earth curvature from a Boeing 747 flight. So you are excused. Just like the massive global warming of the 900-1200 AD in the northern hemisphere, or its appending little-ice age of Europe beginning in the first decades of the sixteenth century, today's mass hysteria of Gorebot Warming has no understanding of this historicism, and is the same as evolutionary proponents today on the web who have no idea of the complexity and arguments of recent DNA studies. It is only going to get more complicated in the coming decades and centuries. I would say there is such a thing as mutation but it has its definable limits. Most scientists, that are real scientists do not jump to conclusions, and only suggest further inquiry. This NY rag is bias, journalist and persuasive industry. It is part of 'news', as in the British sense.

You are simply demonstrating how your emotion has overwhelmed your intellection to the point of desperate straw-grasping when you attempt to impugn such a study. Do you even realize what the clincher is?

There are three billion base pairs in the human genome. Artifactual retroviral DNA sequences did not evolve as part of their hosts' genome' rather, they were spliced in by externally sourced retroviral infections. For genomic matters to be as they demonstrably are, we would not only have to believe that humans and great apes came down with the same retroviral infections, at the same times, thousands of different times, during a period millions of years ago when we cannot find a single fossil skeleton of each, we would also have to believe that, just coincidentally, all of these separate infections spliced into separate three-billion-base-pair genomes in precisely the identically isomorphic locations, thousands of times over.

The evidence is statistically overwhelming. There is vastly less of a probabilty that you could buy one ticket to each lottery on the planet for the rest of a long lifetime and win them all while travelling weekly to Las Vegas and rolling 1200 boxcars in a row every time than that thousands of identical artifactual retroviral DNA sequences just happened to splice, at precisely the same times (measured by sequence degradation) into exactly isomorphic locations in the 3 billion base pair human and great ape genomes in the absence of divergence from a common ancestor.

And these are indeed artifactual retroviral DNA sequences. Their parent viruses have, in some cases, been reconstructed from them.

848 ubercheesehead  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:34:39pm

re: #451 Basho

Here's the deal with science: There will never be a new discovery that will show what we know about biology and/or geology and/or physics and/or every other branch of science to be wrong. Every new unique, extraordinary discovery MUST be consistent with all the previous scientific evidence. It must explain all of the other accumulated data equally well. That's why no real scientist will ever take seriously a "discovery" on a perpetual motion machine, or a footprint of a human with a dinosaur.


Wow! How many errors can we pack into four sentences. To wit:

Yes there are discoveries that show that what we "know" about any given field of scientific endeavor are wrong. It's not that our previous observations were necessarily faulty, but our interpretation of those observations can and routinely are shown to be faulty either due to lack of sufficient data or lack of imagination to be able to synthesize those data into a theory that is consistent with reality.

"Every new unique, extraordinary discovery MUST be consistent with all the previous scientific evidence." Correct, but quite beside the point. If a data point is correct it will coexist in reality with all other real pieces of data. However, no newly discovered data point is under any obligation to not contradict any given interpretation of previously known data points. The interpretations will have to bend to the data, not the other way around.

"It must explain all of the other accumulated data equally well." Wow! This is the biggest whopper of all. Data explains nothing. Theories attempt to explain data. In order for a theory to be useful it must account for more relevant data points better and more elegantly than any other competing theory. Few if any theories account for each and every relevant data point, let alone for data points that have yet to be discovered. If such theories existed there would be no point in further scientific examination--we'd already know everything there is to know about at least those areas explained by those theories.

"That's why no real scientist will ever take seriously a "discovery" on a perpetual motion machine, or a footprint of a human with a dinosaur."

Here we have a conflation of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy with false equivalence. Perpetual motion machines fly fairly in the face of Newtonian physics and quantum mechanics. These laws are arrived at by repeated empirical examination, and fall under the rubric of operational science. Every attempt to falsify these laws by finding a perpetual motion machine only add a few more teaspoons to the ocean of empirical support for them. New archaeological/paleontological data can easily overturn preexisting theories because historical sciences are not open to empirical examination.

849 least  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:37:24pm

re: #835 Salamantis
All y'all can play the "Yeah, but what about . . . " game all day (and night, apparently)

It's a fake or it isn't a fake.
Period.
Wait . . . If it's spurious, it will be revealed - the God you dismiss will see to it.
He really doesn't need our help.

I apologized for wanting to believe that DI was being straight up.
I should have waited.
Maybe you should too?

Stay off Canadian buses.

850 ubercheesehead  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:40:09pm

re: #843 Salamantis

None of the synoptic gospels were written by the apostles whose names they have as titles, and none of them were written within a half'century of Jesus' purported death. The gospel that most closely dates to that era is the Gospel of Thomas, and it was excised by the Council of Nicea.


My, my, my. You are pretty much an authority on everything, aren't you Mantis? Your encyclopedic command of every subject known to man, save your own limitations, is truly a wonder to behold!

851 missykrissy  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:43:09pm

I doubt this is 'real' but even is it is it only proves that a human walked on the same dirt as some unspecified avian or saurian. There is no absolute proof as to which came first ( unless there is other matter in the site).

That said, this could be: (I am ignoring 'fraud' )

1) A human steps on slightly softened clay that also is marked with a much older dino track. ( Does anyone question that some saurians were heavier than humans? Didn't think so.)

2) A now extinct large bird ( such as are known to exist ) stepped in soft clay that was previously marked with a not-so-much older human track.

3) Reverse #2

4) This is the combined track of a very *small* human ( such as a child) with a larger track of a known-but-absent-now-in-that-area species such as a crocodile. In which case, go with #2 or #3 and a date as recent as near-historic times.


I would be more impressed where someone to find SMALL saurian tracks inside a human footprint at no greater depth. THAT would indicate that the human imprint came first, as otherwise it would have destroyed the lighter impressions.

852 least  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:46:46pm

Aaaaaack! PIMF if I use it properly:
I should have written:

I wanted to believe that DI was being straight up.
It seems that I was wrong.
I apologized for posting in haste.
That is all.

Well no . . . why am I not surprised that the only gospel Sal thinks is genuine is a Gnostic gospel?

NOW that's all

853 dwigg  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:47:40pm

Re: 810 Kenneth,
Apologize for coming in late on this thread. Actually I kick myself for not being able to comment earlier. If you care to do so, link to the site for an article on the footprints found in the Laotoli site in Africa ([Link: www.utexas.edu...] This is also a head scratcher. The preserved footprints are identical to footprints of modern man. The volcano eruption that preserved the footprints dates to 2.3 m years ago. I wish the link provided showed a better picture of the prints. There is a much better photo of the footprints of which I don't have the link handy. I grew up near Glen Rose where the dinosaur/human prints were found. The dinosaur print looks identical to the prints that can be presently found in the bed of the Puluxy river. To say they look carved would be incorrect. This is how the prints look to anyone who has visited the site. Are the human/dinosaur prints real? Don't know, but core testing can determine what the fossil composes & help date the material. Anyone care to clarify the modern appearing footprints at the Laotoli site? Thanks.

854 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:52:02pm

re: #849 least

All y'all can play the "Yeah, but what about . . . " game all day (and night, apparently)

It's a fake or it isn't a fake.
Period.
Wait . . . If it's spurious, it will be revealed - the God you dismiss will see to it.
He really doesn't need our help.

I apologized for wanting to believe that DI was being straight up.
I should have waited.
Maybe you should too?

Stay off Canadian buses.

They'd have to breed a special kind of bull to produce bullshit that concentrated. It is not only fake, it is cartoon-type fake. Genuine footprints of the species in question don't even resemble what's been carved out of on this rock.

855 stretch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:52:48pm

Salamantis,

hello again. I know this post is off thread, but I wanted to get back
to you on your challenge regarding artifactual DNA. I've been doing some reading on the topic, and as you may have suspected, the empirical evidence is not as clearcut as your postings have seemed to imply. Here's what I've found so far:

1) The artifactual DNA content that is "common" between man and ape is not "exactly the same" - they are close, about 70% depending on the given papers, but certainly not "exactly the same".
2) uses have been found for a few of the pseudogenes that were
previously claimed to have no purpose
3) none of the researchers' work that I have reviewed have claimed that they know for certainty that the psuedogenes have no purpose.
4) the statistical probability for that random genetic "mistakes" that
do exist in the common pseudogenes very strongly suggest that if there were a common ancestor, that the split would have happened millions of years later than believed, otherwise, random mistakes would have already wiped out the degree of similarity in pseudogenes between the species. The argument could be made that because of the degree in similarity in artifactural DNA between the species that common descent could not have occurred.

this is my rough synopsis of the topic so far - no doubt there is still
great disagreement, but likely will be on a different subject than
"artifactual DNA"

regards,
stretch

856 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 6:56:17pm

re: #850 ubercheesehead

re: #843 Salamantis

None of the synoptic gospels were written by the apostles whose names they have as titles, and none of them were written within a half'century of Jesus' purported death. The gospel that most closely dates to that era is the Gospel of Thomas, and it was excised by the Council of Nicea.

uc: My, my, my. You are pretty much an authority on everything, aren't you Mantis? Your encyclopedic command of every subject known to man, save your own limitations, is truly a wonder to behold!

Sal: Well, I don't thionk that this man or his many and well-documented sources were filled with lies in my graduate level comparative religion class:

[Link: www.amazon.com...]

What are YOUR sources, nimrod?

857 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:03:27pm

re: #855 stretch

Salamantis,

hello again. I know this post is off thread, but I wanted to get back
to you on your challenge regarding artifactual DNA. I've been doing some reading on the topic, and as you may have suspected, the empirical evidence is not as clearcut as your postings have seemed to imply. Here's what I've found so far:

1) The artifactual DNA content that is "common" between man and ape is not "exactly the same" - they are close, about 70% depending on the given papers, but certainly not "exactly the same".
2) uses have been found for a few of the pseudogenes that were
previously claimed to have no purpose
3) none of the researchers' work that I have reviewed have claimed that they know for certainty that the psuedogenes have no purpose.
4) the statistical probability for that random genetic "mistakes" that
do exist in the common pseudogenes very strongly suggest that if there were a common ancestor, that the split would have happened millions of years later than believed, otherwise, random mistakes would have already wiped out the degree of similarity in pseudogenes between the species. The argument could be made that because of the degree in similarity in artifactural DNA between the species that common descent could not have occurred.

this is my rough synopsis of the topic so far - no doubt there is still
great disagreement, but likely will be on a different subject than
"artifactual DNA"

regards,
stretch

Actually, the empirical evidence is PRECISELY as conclusive as I have suggested. Some of the older artifactual DNA sequences are more widely shared than with only great apes, and a few of the newest ones are not shared, because the infections occurred post-divergence. The artifactual DNA sequences are not 'pseudogenes'; they obviously served purposes within the genomes of their parent retroviral species. The degradation rate that you cite is utterly bogus, and if it were indeed the case, the mutation rate would be so high that commonly observed species stability and integrity could not be maintained. Your conclusion is based in nothing other than your visceral desires on the subject. If you wish to assert otherwise, then do what I have done, and post links to these sources that you have purportedly been perusing, so that the rest of us can independently evaluate them.

858 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:07:39pm

re: #853 dwigg

Re: 810 Kenneth,
Apologize for coming in late on this thread. Actually I kick myself for not being able to comment earlier. If you care to do so, link to the site for an article on the footprints found in the Laotoli site in Africa ([Link: www.utexas.edu...] This is also a head scratcher. The preserved footprints are identical to footprints of modern man. The volcano eruption that preserved the footprints dates to 2.3 m years ago. I wish the link provided showed a better picture of the prints. There is a much better photo of the footprints of which I don't have the link handy. I grew up near Glen Rose where the dinosaur/human prints were found. The dinosaur print looks identical to the prints that can be presently found in the bed of the Puluxy river. To say they look carved would be incorrect. This is how the prints look to anyone who has visited the site. Are the human/dinosaur prints real? Don't know, but core testing can determine what the fossil composes & help date the material. Anyone care to clarify the modern appearing footprints at the Laotoli site? Thanks.

Actually, those footprints do not even faintly resemble those of modern humans. They are much smaller and lighter, and the feet are differently shaped - they are the size and shape of what they in fact are, which is prints of australopithecus afarensus, not anything remotely close to homo sapiens.

859 stretch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:07:51pm

i have more reading to do (and gathering of references, i suppose) but to be fair I think it is your turn to go offline and do a bit of research.

i'm still hoping to see some rational basis for claiming that the theory of evolution holds to the scientific method (the original, with falsifiability, not the redefined-to-fit one), some repeatable, observable laboratory experiment demonstrating any one of the core beliefs.

stretch

860 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:09:27pm

re: #852 least

Aaaaaack! PIMF if I use it properly:
I should have written:

I wanted to believe that DI was being straight up.
It seems that I was wrong.
I apologized for posting in haste.
That is all.

Well no . . . why am I not surprised that the only gospel Sal thinks is genuine is a Gnostic gospel?

NOW that's all

I didn't say that I thought that it was genuine; it was still written around 40 years after Jesus' purported death. But it was written before any of the four synoptic gospels.

861 claire  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:10:06pm

Here's what the genuine footprints DO look like and there's tons of them in that state park:

Footprints

A whole bunch of others.

This example does not even look similar. It is not weathered at all which is how they are uncovered in the first place, as far as I know. It looks carved, like the sides are too vertical. The real ones look more like when you press a finger in fondant icing, you get deformation of the top surface bending into the track, etc.

Of course, the creation museum would never let it out to be examined, just like the keepers of the shroud of Turin. Too much risk of it being debunked, etc.

862 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:10:25pm

re: #859 stretch

i have more reading to do (and gathering of references, i suppose) but to be fair I think it is your turn to go offline and do a bit of research.

i'm still hoping to see some rational basis for claiming that the theory of evolution holds to the scientific method (the original, with falsifiability, not the redefined-to-fit one), some repeatable, observable laboratory experiment demonstrating any one of the core beliefs.

stretch

You might check the repeatable-under-controlled-conditions evolution of Lenski's E. Coli.

863 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:13:31pm

re: #851 missykrissy

I doubt this is 'real' but even is it is it only proves that a human walked on the same dirt as some unspecified avian or saurian. There is no absolute proof as to which came first ( unless there is other matter in the site).

That said, this could be: (I am ignoring 'fraud' )

1) A human steps on slightly softened clay that also is marked with a much older dino track. ( Does anyone question that some saurians were heavier than humans? Didn't think so.)

2) A now extinct large bird ( such as are known to exist ) stepped in soft clay that was previously marked with a not-so-much older human track.

3) Reverse #2

4) This is the combined track of a very *small* human ( such as a child) with a larger track of a known-but-absent-now-in-that-area species such as a crocodile. In which case, go with #2 or #3 and a date as recent as near-historic times.

I would be more impressed where someone to find SMALL saurian tracks inside a human footprint at no greater depth. THAT would indicate that the human imprint came first, as otherwise it would have destroyed the lighter impressions.

Umm...I think that the clay just might have hardened in 65 MILLION YEARS...

864 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:14:54pm

re: #849 least

All y'all can play the "Yeah, but what about . . . " game all day (and night, apparently)

It's a fake or it isn't a fake.
Period.
Wait . . . If it's spurious, it will be revealed - the God you dismiss will see to it.
He really doesn't need our help.

I apologized for wanting to believe that DI was being straight up.
I should have waited.
Maybe you should too?

Stay off Canadian buses.

Why wait on conclusive paleontological, genetic and laboratory evidence that is already here?

865 stretch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:15:17pm

re: #861 claire

Here's what the genuine footprints DO look like and there's tons of them in that state park:

Footprints

A whole bunch of others.

This example does not even look similar. It is not weathered at all which is how they are uncovered in the first place, as far as I know. It looks carved, like the sides are too vertical. The real ones look more like when you press a finger in fondant icing, you get deformation of the top surface bending into the track, etc.

Of course, the creation museum would never let it out to be examined, just like the keepers of the shroud of Turin. Too much risk of it being debunked, etc.


i've been to the park and seen the footprints. The ones that are recently uncovered when the overburden is removed did look like the ones in the picture. the footprints that have been exposed in the riverbed limestone start to weather away quite rapidly.

stretch

866 reine.de.tout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:16:31pm

re: #699 Hhar

291 reine.de.tout

The CT scan is there to look like the Museum had performed due diligence in examing the track. The idea of scanning it is to look at how sediments would be disturbed by a foot pushing into the mud: if you have lines of sediment, they would be deformed by any true track. A carving, on the other hand, would not distort the sediment lines, but would cut cleanly through them and leave the ones underneath undisturbed.

Interesting. Thanks for the info!

867 claire  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:19:04pm

re: #850 ubercheesehead

Now that you mention it, Salamantis IS pretty amazing.

re: #865 stretch

Pictures?

868 reine.de.tout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:19:45pm

re: #861 claire

Here's what the genuine footprints DO look like and there's tons of them in that state park:

Footprints

A whole bunch of others..

Thanks for those links.

869 stretch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:23:11pm

re: #862 Salamantis

You might check the repeatable-under-controlled-conditions evolution of Lenski's E. Coli.

we've been over that: many multiples of E. Coli spontaneously evolves into.... E. Coli?

just the simple fact that that example is the best you could think of, when asked for evidence according to the scientific method, should affirm for you that evolution is a failed theory.

stretch

870 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:23:38pm

re: #848 ubercheesehead

Wow! How many errors can we pack into four sentences. To wit:

Yes there are discoveries that show that what we "know" about any given field of scientific endeavor are wrong. It's not that our previous observations were necessarily faulty, but our interpretation of those observations can and routinely are shown to be faulty either due to lack of sufficient data or lack of imagination to be able to synthesize those data into a theory that is consistent with reality.

"Every new unique, extraordinary discovery MUST be consistent with all the previous scientific evidence." Correct, but quite beside the point. If a data point is correct it will coexist in reality with all other real pieces of data. However, no newly discovered data point is under any obligation to not contradict any given interpretation of previously known data points. The interpretations will have to bend to the data, not the other way around.

"It must explain all of the other accumulated data equally well." Wow! This is the biggest whopper of all. Data explains nothing. Theories attempt to explain data. In order for a theory to be useful it must account for more relevant data points better and more elegantly than any other competing theory. Few if any theories account for each and every relevant data point, let alone for data points that have yet to be discovered. If such theories existed there would be no point in further scientific examination--we'd already know everything there is to know about at least those areas explained by those theories.

"That's why no real scientist will ever take seriously a "discovery" on a perpetual motion machine, or a footprint of a human with a dinosaur."

Here we have a conflation of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy with false equivalence. Perpetual motion machines fly fairly in the face of Newtonian physics and quantum mechanics. These laws are arrived at by repeated empirical examination, and fall under the rubric of operational science. Every attempt to falsify these laws by finding a perpetual motion machine only add a few more teaspoons to the ocean of empirical support for them. New archaeological/paleontological data can easily overturn preexisting theories because historical sciences are not open to empirical examination.

New theories must not only encompass explanations of what the older theories did not explain (the anomalies that lead to them being reconsidered), but must also explain the evidence that the older theories DID explain, and must do so at least as well as they did. Einstein's relativity theory did this regarding Newtonian physics.

New paleontological data can augment, but cannot falsify, older paleontological data; it still means what it means. And in fact, such data is as solid as can be (it is, after all, fossil data), and as such can be subjected to repeated empirical examination. You don't have to have been at OJ's house that night to prove who was there from the DNA in the blood, and you don't have to have lived 65 million years ago to carbon-date a dino bone. Or hundreds of thousands of them.

871 ubercheesehead  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:23:51pm

re: #855 stretch
You're exactly right about pseudogenes. It is important to keep in mind that lack of evidence for the function of a gene does not constitute evidence for lack of function for said gene...unless, of course, the one lacking evidence happens to be omniscient.


re: #856 Salamantis

re: #843 Salamantis


Sal: Well, I don't thionk that this man or his many and well-documented sources were filled with lies in my graduate level comparative religion class:

[Link: www.amazon.com...]

What are YOUR sources, nimrod?


First off, thank you for putting me in the exalted company of Nimrod, truly a manly, Second Amendment upholding kind of man. Not like those namby-pamby, puffy, effeminate libs! But I digress.

OK, so when you are not appealing to your own authority you appeal to the New Yorker or some guy who teaches at a satellite campus of a land-grant college in a field of study that makes Underwater Basket-Weaving Women's Studies look like rigorous academic bull work? I owe you thanks yet again, this time for a good laugh!

872 Naso Tang  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:26:57pm

re: #849 least

All y'all can play the "Yeah, but what about . . . " game all day (and night, apparently)

It's a fake or it isn't a fake.
Period.

No, it doesn't have to be either. It can also be misinterpreted. Do you believe any of those pieces of food looking like the Virgin Mary, on Ebay, are either fake or are not fake?

The big toe mark is obviously a hole in the rock, not a toe impression. The "ball" of the foot just below it also looks too deep to be a simple impression, and the circular fracture line on one side of it looks very much like a piece of rock flaked off there.

The four small toe marks could actually only be 3 "toe" marks, with the little toe merely a depression in the rock which allows our pattern finding minds to see it as part of the other three. I don't know what they are, but I believe that they have been identified as possibly from a smaller type of animal. Certainly they don't look like my footprints when I take long walks on the beach. My toes don't leave a long impression like that. Do yours?

The heel of the "foot" doesn't have to be part of the whole picture at all, it just seems conveniently placed and could be natural or another animal print.

The first point however is that if one takes away any one of those items, then there is no human footprint, and I'll start with just the big toe.

The second point is that countless footprints of dinosaurs have been found, and which are irrefutable, but only in creationist museums do we find the "human" ones.

873 ubercheesehead  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:27:26pm

re: #867 claire

Now that you mention it, Salamantis IS pretty amazing.

Be careful of the Kool Aid!

874 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:28:30pm

re: #865 stretch

i've been to the park and seen the footprints. The ones that are recently uncovered when the overburden is removed were more recently carved out did look like the ones in the picture. the footprints that have been exposed in the riverbed limestone have been carved out for some timestart to weather away quite rapidly.

stretch

Fixed that for ya.

875 ubercheesehead  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:29:42pm

re: #869 stretch

we've been over that: many multiples of E. Coli spontaneously evolves into.... E. Coli?

just the simple fact that that example is the best you could think of, when asked for evidence according to the scientific method, should affirm for you that evolution is a failed theory.

stretch

Yeah, I asked him to show that E. Coli turns into anything but E. Coli (or better yet to show that fruit flies turn into anything other than fruit flies; or that unicellular organisms turn into multicellular ones) back on the last DT, and just got crickets in response.

876 stretch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:32:01pm

re: #867 claire

Now that you mention it, Salamantis IS pretty amazing.

re: #865 stretch

Pictures?

looking through the archives... back in a while

stretch

877 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:32:51pm

re: #869 stretch

we've been over that: many multiples of E. Coli spontaneously evolves into.... E. Coli?

just the simple fact that that example is the best you could think of, when asked for evidence according to the scientific method, should affirm for you that evolution is a failed theory.

stretch

Actually, it affirms that evolution is a multiply confirmed theory, from laboratory experments upon living organisms as well as from the evidence in the genomes of every species on the planet, and from every fossil uncovered in the paleontological record.

This Lenski reply sounds like your cup of tea; the second reply could have been addressed specifically to you:

[Link: rationalwiki.com...]

878 claire  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:35:54pm

re: #869 stretch

should affirm for you that evolution is a failed theory.

No, actually the fact that you can observe life changing in response to it's environment in the lab should convince you that evolution happens. If it didn't, then no matter what stressors e-coli or bacteria or fruitflies were put under shouldn't result in ANY adaptation if there is not evolution. Right? Yet, there it is.

879 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:36:11pm

re: #875 ubercheesehead

Yeah, I asked him to show that E. Coli turns into anything but E. Coli (or better yet to show that fruit flies turn into anything other than fruit flies; or that unicellular organisms turn into multicellular ones) back on the last DT, and just got crickets in response.

A major evolution happened to that e. coli; it developed the ability to metabolize citric acid. No other e. coli is known to feed off citric acid; in fact, a high enough pH acidity level is known to kill off e. coli.

That evolutionary change is roughly analogous to humans developing the ability to metabolize strychnine. Just like your preachers, when they can't find the right snakes.

880 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:39:19pm

stretch is now going to search for cases when pompous hemorrhoidal anuses caused me to lose my temper at them and curse them out, and he will find them. He will use these losses of temper as a means of ad hominem attack, with which to claim that all of the logic, facts and evidence that I have proffered are not to be given any credence, regardless of the impeccability of their sources. This is the way people like him roll.

881 stretch  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:39:54pm

re: #874 Salamantis

Fixed that for ya.

thanks (there is dried juicy-juice on my keyboard - its quite tedious to work with)

stretch

882 Naso Tang  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:42:44pm

re: #878 claire

No, actually the fact that you can observe life changing in response to it's environment in the lab should convince you that evolution happens. If it didn't, then no matter what stressors e-coli or bacteria or fruitflies were put under shouldn't result in ANY adaptation if there is not evolution. Right? Yet, there it is.

I think someone else had an answer for that yesterday (I forget who). They simply called it designed plasticity.

883 Salamantis  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:43:34pm

re: #880 Salamantis

stretch is now going to search for cases when pompous hemorrhoidal anuses caused me to lose my temper at them and curse them out, and he will find them. He will use these losses of temper as a means of ad hominem attack, with which to claim that all of the logic, facts and evidence that I have proffered are not to be given any credence, regardless of the impeccability of their sources. This is the way people like him roll.

My profuse apologies for my hasty and paranoid mistake, born of having been attacked so frequently and viciously by rabid true believers; after I checked the post reference, it became obvious that stretch is apparently just looking for pics of creationist dino-and-human-foot sculptures.

884 reine.de.tout  Thu, Jul 31, 2008 7:45:37pm

re: #880 Salamantis

stretch is now going to search for cases when pompous hemorrhoidal anuses caused me to lose my temper at them and curse them out, and he will find them. He will use these losses of temper as a means of ad hominem attack, with which to re: #867 claire

claim that all of the logic, facts and evidence that I have proffered are not to be given any credence, regardless of the impeccability of their sou