LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

Signs of Anti-Creationist Sanity in Kansas

Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:46:51 pm PDT

In the race for the Kansas State Board of Education, voters have dealt a crushing blow to creationist candidate Alan Detrich: Conservatives Leading Half of School Board Races.

In the 4th District, with 85 percent reporting, conservative Bob Meissner of Topeka, had 76 percent against Alan Detrich, of Lawrence.

In 2005, Detrich explained his views on evolution to the Lawrence Journal-World: Creationist plans run for education board.

A fossil hunter who supports intelligent design will run for the Kansas State Board of Education seat now held by a defender of evolution.

“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,” said Alan Detrich, a 58-year-old Lawrence Republican who takes classes at Kansas University. “I don’t think that’s right.” ...

Detrich said he was convinced that life is too complex to be the product of evolution, and that those beliefs will be the centerpiece of his three-year campaign.

“I want to get the question out, not the answer, but the question out,” he said. “The question is the story of the rock and the clock. If you find a rock in a field, no big deal. If you find a clock in a field, you look around for who created it.

“Did we just appear like the rock? Or did it take intelligent design to make us?” Detrich asked. “I think it took intelligent design to make us.”

Here’s Detrich’s web site, with more of the concepts he wanted to teach Kansas schoolchildren: Spear of Creation.

spear-it (spirit)

evil-utionist = ape-iest = malarki-ologist

a “scientist” sighs... then tests

... there are NO PERKS in purgatory

Life is a short story with a L o n g e n d i n g.

You can’t get to Heaven with deeds alone - What you will need is a real understanding of abstracts.

Advertisement

513 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:48:38pm

Good job, Kansas!

2 reine.de.tout  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:48:41pm
“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,” said Alan Detrich, a 58-year-old Lawrence Republican who takes classes at Kansas University. “I don’t think that’s right.” .

Where the heck has any "evolutionist" ever said any such thing?

3 Mich-again  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:48:59pm
“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,”

Got a link supporting that ridiculous statement?

I didn't think so.

4 Killgore Trout  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:49:04pm

Conservatives? Oh, shit.

5 MandyManners  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:49:20pm
“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha

I'll go along with the Mo bit.

6 Charles  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:50:31pm

re: #4 Killgore Trout

Conservatives? Oh, shit.

In this case, the "conservative" candidate is winning against the creationist.

7 jcm  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:50:48pm
spear-it (spirit)

evil-utionist = ape-iest = malarki-ologist

a “scientist” sighs... then tests

... there are NO PERKS in purgatory

Life is a short story with a L o n g e n d i n g.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

8 solomonpanting  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:51:41pm

“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,” said Alan Detrich

That description escapes me, but I'd bet Mr. Detrich is half-idiot, half-wit.

9 Mich-again  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:52:27pm

Really, which side was the chimpanzee? His Father's or his Mother's?

Mary was human. Is he saying that G* is a chimp?

10 Charles  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:52:35pm

"The rock and the clock."

It's the idiot's version of William Paley's "watchmaker" analogy:

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

11 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:52:38pm

“Did we just appear like the rock?

"Welcooom to the Rhochk!

(Chanelling Sean Connery in The Rock!) It rocks, as far as rocks rock and don't roll.

12 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:53:29pm
there are NO PERKS in purgatory

Oh, damn. And I was looking so forward to Purgatory perks. I'm crushed!

13 Killgore Trout  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:55:03pm

re: #6 Charles

It's nice to see the conservatives stepping up to the plate. I guess Kansas has learned what Louisiana hasn't figured out yet. Being the laughing stock of the modern world will lose votes.

14 HelloDare  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:55:06pm

I wish God would tell these creationists to shut up.

15 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:59:51pm

re: #13 Killgore Trout

It's nice to see the conservatives stepping up to the plate. I guess Kansas has learned what Louisiana hasn't figured out yet. Being the laughing stock of the modern world will lose votes.

I wish for the day that "conservative" means political and not religious. I hate that conservative principles are highjacked by religious extremists. It's downright......Islamo... er, just plain...FASCIST!

16 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 8:59:57pm

Out of a total of 31 posts on the front page, there is just one post about evolution, and one about creationism. That only accounts for 6% of the total front page posts.

Charles, if you are going to live up to these accusations about your obsession with this issue, you're going to have to work harder than that. 6% just ain't enough to qualify for the mantel of obsessiveness.

/s

17 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:00:01pm

Seems to me the tide is turning.

18 Mich-again  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:00:28pm

How did NASA ever figure out how to get a rocket to puncture the firmament?

19 least  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:02:04pm

Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Apparently, this guy has taken lessons in how to make enemies and repel people (and really lose elections)

20 wolfie  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:02:38pm

re: #14 HelloDare

No need to invoke supernatural help in this case, HD, since the guy is being crushed in the election.

21 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:03:07pm

Kansas? Were Dorothy and Toto there too?

/I tried to come-up with something that had Hotel California in it, but I'm tired after the drive. Forgive me.

22 MJ  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:03:08pm

“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,” said Alan Detrich...."

And Alan Detrich is all moron...

23 least  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:03:52pm

re: #18 Mich-again

Huh?

24 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:03:54pm

re: #17 Lynn B.

Seems to me the tide is turning.

Let's hope it stays on the side of reason.

25 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:04:43pm

re: #23 least

Huh?

Heh!

26 Maximu§  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:04:56pm

OT

Has anyone here seen this picture of Chile's Chaitén volcano erupting with lava, ash and lightning?

The little-understood storms may be sparked when rock fragments, ash, and ice particles in the plume collide to produce static charges...its not greatly studied because most folk run away when this occurs.

Chile's Chaitén volcano

27 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:05:19pm

"said Alan Detrich, a 58-year-old Lawrence Republican who takes classes at Kansas University"

I don't know what to say to this.

Lizards, help.

28 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:05:47pm

re: #21 ggt Hi there ggt, will this do: [Link: www.imeem.com...]

29 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:06:14pm

re: #24 Sharmuta

Let's hope it stays on the side of reason.

Amen, Sharm.

30 HelloDare  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:06:48pm

re: #20 wolfie

If only he were the only one.

31 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:07:10pm

re: #26 Maximu§

THAT is one majorly kewl photo!

32 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:07:15pm

re: #18 Mich-again Hey Mich! How are ya tonight?

33 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:08:11pm

re: #28 realwest

HEY RW! How ya' doin'?

Thanks for helpin' me out with the link.

34 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:08:22pm

Good morning/evening all. Saw a teaser headline in today's Toronto Sun saying that in a poll 9% believed in creationism.

/if that's the case I am really starting to hate squeaky wheels.
//bbiab, time to use my google fu.

35 least  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:08:50pm

re: #25 Russkilitlover

Heh!

Ho!

36 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:08:50pm

re: #26 Maximu§

OT

Has anyone here seen this picture of Chile's Chaitén volcano erupting with lava, ash and lightning?

The little-understood storms may be sparked when rock fragments, ash, and ice particles in the plume collide to produce static charges...its not greatly studied because most folk run away when this occurs.

Chile's Chaitén volcano

I read about this probably a month or two ago. Not much media picked it up - guess they don't even have the knowledge to question. Extraordinary phenom in our real world. There is so much that we don't know and even more that we don't want to know.

37 Mich-again  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:09:57pm

re: #23 least

Huh?

If one believes the literal story of creation in Genesis, then they must believe in the presence of the firmament. Its the layer between Earth and the heavens.

38 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:10:31pm

re: #35 least

Ho!

Who you callin' Ho?

39 Mich-again  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:10:47pm

re: #32 realwest

Pretty good RW. But the back is a little sore from all the roller coasters at Cedar Point.

40 Purple Prose  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:11:19pm

I love all of these anti-irrationalist threads. It is part and parcel with opposition to Islamist absolutism. The rationalism we inherited from the Renaissance and the Enlightenment are the foundation of the modern West and our best defense against all medieval forces that wish to throw us back into an age of darkness. Yet, all the same, I wish there were more posts directly pertaining to the most clear and immediate medieval threat that faces us: Islamism.

Evolution as a scientific discipline and the teaching of this science is not nearly as threatened by irrationalists as Western civilization (including Christianity and scientific thought) as a whole is by a specific breed of irrationalist: Islamism.

CAIR and all the other related organizations are still on the march, working day and night to undermine the foundations of democratic liberal (in the classical sense) society. Their financial and ideological supporters abroad are also working, day and night, to extend sharia, acutely aware of the soft spots of open Western societies.

That is the most immediate and imminent and dangerous threat we all face, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, secular humanist or atheist.

41 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:12:17pm

Last I saw, Rasmussen had McCain leading Obama in Kansas by 20 points.

Maybe it's all that flat land. They have a longer view of the horizon out there.

42 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:12:29pm

Found it, sorry my bad misread the headline. 1 in 5 support creationism(20%).

43 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:12:41pm

re: #33 ggt Hey ggt - I'm doing ok, except for this damn tooth (again).
I hope you're doing ok - tired though I know you must be!

44 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:13:53pm

re: #39 Mich-again
Huh? Geez when I used to go on rollercoasters it was usually my hands that were sore from gripping too hard for too long! LOL!

45 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:14:33pm

re: #40 Purple Prose

What's your point?

46 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:15:01pm

I think the Bush administration has been too successful against terrorism. I used to be able to count on coming here and reading story after story about terrorists, radical muslims, etc. Now I come here and almost always find a story about "creationism." Oh well.

Like most things, this won't be solved by running for office. You don't like what is being taught in public schools? Then either teach your children to think for themselves and to understand the variety of opinions you will find in realms such as science, or put them in a private school.

47 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:15:06pm

re: #40 Purple Prose


CAIR and all the other related organizations are still on the march, working day and night to undermine the foundations of democratic liberal (in the classical sense) society. Their financial and ideological supporters abroad are also working, day and night, to extend sharia, acutely aware of the soft spots of open Western societies.

That is the most immediate and imminent and dangerous threat we all face, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, secular humanist or atheist.

But it creates such a serendipitous situation to have us bickering amongst ourselves vis-a-via creationism, ID, evolution. We'll keep hammering each other and before we know it....Sharia! End of all discussions.

48 Mich-again  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:15:08pm

re: #44 realwest

Huh? Geez when I used to go on rollercoasters it was usually my hands that were sore from gripping too hard for too long! LOL!

Who needs hands on a roller coaster? You're supposed to hold them up high!

I'm out. See you again later.

49 least  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:15:31pm

re: #26 Maximu§

Thanks for the photo -- definitely my desktop pic of the month

50 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:16:15pm

re: #48 Mich-again Oh, ok! LOL!
Have a good one Mich!

51 IslandLibertarian  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:16:26pm

Worried about creationist dogma?
Just inflate your tires, get a tune-up, think HOPE and CHANGE.......
It will do just about as much as anything else you try to stop these people, short of outlawing them or worse.

PTTCP

52 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:16:37pm

re: #43 realwest

no resolution on the teef? Sorry to hear that.

I'm doin' good, glad to be home with the critters. Thanks for asking.

Lake Superior is beautiful. Hope to go back within the year.

53 least  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:16:42pm

re: #38 Russkilitlover

Ruh-roh.
I fergited about that term.
scuzzi.

54 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:18:08pm

re: #51 IslandLibertarian

Listened to Rush for awhile on the drive back today. He hammered the tire pressure topic to death. Finally had to switch to the iPod.

55 solomonpanting  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:18:49pm

re: #41 Lynn B.

Last I saw, Rasmussen had McCain leading Obama in Kansas by 20 points.

Maybe it's all that flat land. They have a longer view of the horizon out there.

Someone did a study a few years ago and concluded that Kansas really is flatter than a pancake.

Just don't add any blueberries....

56 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:19:10pm
I want to get the question out, not the answer, but the question out

That's because there already is an answer, but they don't like it, so they have to have a different question in order to get the answer they've already preconceived.

57 Maximu§  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:19:45pm

re: #31 ggt

THAT is one majorly kewl photo!

Yeah, it was taken in early May. I guess this volcano had the same destructive power as Mt. Saint Helens.

Heres one more...funny how natures power (like an earthquake) can show us Humans just how tiny and weak we are.

Chaitén volcano

58 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:19:52pm

re: #51 IslandLibertarian
Uh, I don't know what you mean by PTTCP - would you mind explaining it for me?

59 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:20:30pm

re: #46 cslepage

I think the Bush administration has been too successful against terrorism. I used to be able to count on coming here and reading story after story about terrorists, radical muslims, etc. Now I come here and almost always find a story about "creationism." Oh well.

Like most things, this won't be solved by running for office. You don't like what is being taught in public schools? Then either teach your children to think for themselves and to understand the variety of opinions you will find in realms such as science, or put them in a private school.

Away with your rational thought! You have entered the realm of creationism vs. evolution - where only dogmatic certainties lay.

/big, big, sarc, so as not to offend Lizards of all persuasions. Learn science in public schools, explore religious possibilities at church or through philosophy. Why, oh why is this so difficult?

60 Throbert McGee  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:21:13pm
there are NO PERKS in purgatory

The mention of purgatory intrigues me (well, maybe "intrigues" is too strong a word).

I thought that Purgatory was a concept found only in Roman Catholic theology -- but the Vatican frowns on the kind of Genesis literalism this guy is espousing. (One of his web pages refers to marine fossils deposited by "The Great Flood.") Of course, it's certainly possible that a lay Catholic could choose, as an individual, believe in Young Earth Creationism, even though the Church discourages such belief.

And there's no question that some American Protestant denominations are strongly anti-Purgatory -- they regard it as a theological corruption that gives the false hope of avoiding Hell for people who die "unsaved."

61 IslandLibertarian  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:21:23pm

re: #54 ggt

I can't stomach Rush for more than 1/2 hour no matter what he's talking about.
And I was listening BEFORE he was syndicated.
He is brilliant, but a bit full of himself.

62 maddogg  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:21:24pm
“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,” said Alan Detrich, a 58-year-old Lawrence Republican who takes classes at Kansas University. “I don’t think that’s right.” ...

Its that kind of bullshit statement, which is a blatant lie by the way, tells me I have no need to read anything else you have to say.

63 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:21:25pm

re: #55 solomonpanting

Some scientists have way too much time on their hands.

64 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:21:59pm

re: #40 Purple Prose

I love all of these anti-irrationalist threads. It is part and parcel with opposition to Islamist absolutism. The rationalism we inherited from the Renaissance and the Enlightenment are the foundation of the modern West and our best defense against all medieval forces that wish to throw us back into an age of darkness. Yet, all the same, I wish there were more posts directly pertaining to the most clear and immediate medieval threat that faces us: Islamism.

And yet ...

Evolution as a scientific discipline and the teaching of this science is not nearly as threatened by irrationalists as Western civilization (including Christianity and scientific thought) as a whole is by a specific breed of irrationalist: Islamism.

CAIR and all the other related organizations are still on the march, working day and night to undermine the foundations of democratic liberal (in the classical sense) society. Their financial and ideological supporters abroad are also working, day and night, to extend sharia, acutely aware of the soft spots of open Western societies.

That is the most immediate and imminent and dangerous threat we all face, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, secular humanist or atheist.

You're right, of course. Charles really should start getting up to speed on that whole Islamism/CAIR thing 'cause clearly this is news to him...

/oy vey

65 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:22:31pm

re: #37 Mich-again

If one believes the literal story of creation in Genesis, then they must believe in the presence of the firmament. Its the layer between Earth and the heavens.

I believe in the literal story of creation in Genesis. And, the first Chapter of Genesis describes a firmament that contains the planets and the stars, and the firmament the birds fly in. It's not precisely a layer between two things, and it's not a single item. The Bible describes three types of "heavens": one, this planet's atmosphere, two, the universe, and three, Heaven.

66 Maximu§  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:22:35pm

re: #49 least

Thanks for the photo -- definitely my desktop pic of the month


its on my desktop also.

67 MandyManners  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:22:59pm

re: #59 Russkilitlover

Away with your rational thought! You have entered the realm of creationism vs. evolution - where only dogmatic certainties lay.

/big, big, sarc, so as not to offend Lizards of all persuasions. Learn science in public schools, explore religious possibilities at church or through philosophy. Why, oh why is this so difficult?

Glad you attached that sarc thingy.

68 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:23:17pm

re: #46 cslepage

I think the Bush administration has been too successful against terrorism. I used to be able to count on coming here and reading story after story about terrorists, radical muslims, etc. Now I come here and almost always find a story about "creationism." Oh well.

Like most things, this won't be solved by running for office. You don't like what is being taught in public schools? Then either teach your children to think for themselves and to understand the variety of opinions you will find in realms such as science, or put them in a private school.

Perspective. ID creationist are the kissing cousins of the taliban. They are just in larvae stage here in the US still. Get with it CSLEPAGE

69 Pawn of the Oppressor  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:23:36pm

re: #14 HelloDare

I wish God would tell these creationists to shut up.

Monty Python springs immediately to mind. Either the talking head in the sky, or John Cleese repeating "Shut up, please" in that one sketch... Take your pick

70 Palandine  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:23:44pm

OT

Not to sound like a $cientologist, but if you possibly can avoid it, try not to take long-term antidepressants. I'm at the end, I hope, of a month-long taper off of a drug, and SSRI withdrawal is icky. So woozy right now.

Still, it helped when I needed it. I'm glad to be quitting, but it's hard on the bod. Avoid these strong drugs if possible.

71 Charles  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:23:49pm

re: #46 cslepage

I think the Bush administration has been too successful against terrorism. I used to be able to count on coming here and reading story after story about terrorists, radical muslims, etc. Now I come here and almost always find a story about "creationism." Oh well.

Really? So you were happier when there were terror attacks every other day, resulting in mass murders and atrocities?

Interesting.

I thought we were supposed to be glad that terrorism is on the decline.

72 IslandLibertarian  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:23:52pm

re: #58 realwest

You can't stop true believers from spouting their dogma unless you:
1. outlaw them
2. eliminate them
But we know those are not solutions used in the U.S.A.

73 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:24:57pm

re: #40 Purple Prose

I love all of these anti-irrationalist threads. It is part and parcel with opposition to Islamist absolutism. The rationalism we inherited from the Renaissance and the Enlightenment are the foundation of the modern West and our best defense against all medieval forces that wish to throw us back into an age of darkness. Yet, all the same, I wish there were more posts directly pertaining to the most clear and immediate medieval threat that faces us: Islamism.

Evolution as a scientific discipline and the teaching of this science is not nearly as threatened by irrationalists as Western civilization (including Christianity and scientific thought) as a whole is by a specific breed of irrationalist: Islamism.

CAIR and all the other related organizations are still on the march, working day and night to undermine the foundations of democratic liberal (in the classical sense) society. Their financial and ideological supporters abroad are also working, day and night, to extend sharia, acutely aware of the soft spots of open Western societies.

That is the most immediate and imminent and dangerous threat we all face, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, secular humanist or atheist.

I apologize for updinging you. You usually do so much better than this post.

This blog can walk the anti-jihadist walk and chew the pro-science gum at the same time.

No idiotarionism should be immune. None should be given short shrift on behalf of any other.

And Islamocreationism and the domestic Christian variety have recently become bedfellows.

Principled opposition to irrationalism does not discriminate as to which irrationalisms to and to not oppose. They are all enemies of logic, reason, rationality, the acceptance of facts, and the acknowledgement of empirical evidence. No idiotarian cow should be sacred, and any deserving idiotarian ox may be gored.

74 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:25:18pm

re: #56 Sharmuta

That's because there already is an answer, but they don't like it, so they have to have a different question in order to get the answer they've already preconceived.

"Question me an answer loud and clear. I will answer with a question, clear and bright."

From a musical somewhere, can't for the life of me remember where. I'm thinking Disney, but heck, I don't know. Just popped into my head!

75 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:25:36pm

re: #54 ggt

the iPod had a Pritzker Military Library Medal of Honor Podcast for us.
It was a talk with this guy. He was played by Greg Kinnear in the movie "We Were Soldiers".

74 years old and still funny.

76 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:25:50pm

re: #71 Charles

Really? So you were happier when there were terror attacks every other day, resulting in mass murders and atrocities?

Interesting.

I thought we were supposed to be glad that terrorism is on the decline.

And I am. Sorry my sarcasm flew over your head into the firmament.

77 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:26:00pm

re: #72 IslandLibertarian

Well they do have their first amendment rights. We just have to ignore them.

78 Charles  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:26:04pm

re: #65 cslepage

I believe in the literal story of creation in Genesis. And, the first Chapter of Genesis describes a firmament that contains the planets and the stars, and the firmament the birds fly in. It's not precisely a layer between two things, and it's not a single item. The Bible describes three types of "heavens": one, this planet's atmosphere, two, the universe, and three, Heaven.

Well, that clarifies why you're complaining about the pro-evolution posts.

79 Hard Right  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:27:06pm

I thought Buhdda was half clock?

80 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:28:12pm

re: #53 least

Ruh-roh.
I fergited about that term.
scuzzi.

This "Ho" forgives your transgressions! LOL!

81 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:28:50pm

re: #74 Russkilitlover

Indeed. Don't like the answer? Then just ask a different question!

It reminds me of leftists holding elections over and over until they get the results that they want, or Soviet basketball replaying 3 seconds of a game over and over until they got the result they wanted. Denial can be a demanding mistress.

82 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:28:55pm

re: #68 hazzyday

ID creationist are the kissing cousins of the taliban. They are just in larvae stage here in the US still.

/by all means, say something else really stupid

83 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:29:18pm

re: #73 Salamantis

gored and barbequed!

84 Salem  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:29:21pm

I hope Charles posts about whatever the hell he wants to post about. Some of you don't seem to recognize how much of a responsibility it is to update a blog everyday. The Innertubes are clogged with blogs that haven't been updated for years. Maintaining enthusiasm for the same topic day in and day out must be easy for some. I already know I couldn't do it. I would get fed up with the whining and dictating and slow news days inside of a month, let alone the long years that Charles has been doing it.

85 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:29:31pm

re: #76 cslepage

Clearly, your sarcasm is just too sophisticated for most everyone here. Humble and abject apologies for our ignorance.

/ah ... here's a little tool to help clarify the tone of this post

86 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:29:55pm

re: #46 cslepage

I think the Bush administration has been too successful against terrorism. I used to be able to count on coming here and reading story after story about terrorists, radical muslims, etc. Now I come here and almost always find a story about "creationism." Oh well.

Like most things, this won't be solved by running for office. You don't like what is being taught in public schools? Then either teach your children to think for themselves and to understand the variety of opinions you will find in realms such as science, or put them in a private school.

Actually, the issue is already determined, by the application of the 1st Amendment, as was done in the Dover case with Creationism 2.0 (intelligent design). But true believers are nothing if not persistent, so the courts keep having to prohibit the teaching of Creationism 2.1, and 2.2, and 3.0, and so on, in public high school science classes.

BTW: I'm damn glad that the Bush administration has been as successful against terrorism as it has been. I cannot imagine what sort of mindset would prefer otherwise.

87 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:30:31pm

re: #76 cslepage

And I am. Sorry my sarcasm flew over your head into the firmament.

Hmmm until I know someone well i take them literally at their printed word. You can't claim sarcasm post snark unless you /sarc'd yourself.

I can untroll someone once I know them better if they started out trolling.

88 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:30:43pm

re: #72 IslandLibertarian
Thank you for that. I thought the entire thrust of this ID/Creationism thing was that ID/Creationism shouldn't be taught in public schools - at least not as "science" and frankly I'd rather not have religion taught in any way in public or taxpayer assisted schools. I didn't think that the whole ID/Creationist stuff was about what people believe in personally.

But I'd still like to know what PTTCP means or stands for.

89 maddogg  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:31:40pm

These guys are not creationists, they are Bibleists.

90 mfarmer1  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:31:53pm

A 58 year old fossil hunter taking college courses...

I wouldn't even need to know about his stance on anything else to know that he wouldn't get my vote.

That stuff from his website homepage Charles included here is pure weirdo cuckoo bullcrap that only has meaning in the mind of the author...and probably all of the author's other friends also occupying the same space in his brain. My Star Trek Universal Translator couldn't even decipher the demented offerings.

91 Killgore Trout  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:31:56pm

For those who missed it earlier....
The Genius of Charles Darwin
Aired on Chanel 4 last week.
/Namaste, y,all

92 IslandLibertarian  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:32:02pm

re: #58 realwest

Uh, I don't know what you mean by PTTCP - would you mind explaining it for me?

Power to the Correct People!
PTTCP
It is a tongue-in-cheek paly on the '60s mantra I came up with back when I converted to Libertarianism. I imagined Elite-Progressive-Liberals standing around, sipping wine and saying "Well of course, but power to the "Correct" people."
But upon further thought, I realized there are correct people and incorrect people when it comes to having real power. Especially power to govern.
If you think about it, you can come up with a list of incorrect people you do not want to have real power over you.

Peace

93 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:32:37pm

re: #67 MandyManners

Glad you attached that sarc thingy.

What else could there be, but a BIG sacr tag to all things creationisn, ID, evolution. All believe what they believe. All will see facts that fit their belief. I, for one, would never belittle a fervent belief, but neither will I deny my own to assuage someone else's belief.

94 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:33:29pm

re: #89 maddogg

They are snake-oil salesmen. Nothing more. They have an emotional agenda they can use to mobilize people into giving them the power they crave.

95 Palandine  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:33:37pm

re: #88 realwest

Power To The Correct People.

Not an acronym I can personally get behind, but that's what it stands for.

96 Edouard  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:33:54pm

re: #69 Pawn of the Oppressor

Monty Python springs immediately to mind. Either the talking head in the sky, or John Cleese repeating "Shut up, please" in that one sketch... Take your pick

Don't forget the hilarious "Come and see the violence inherent in the system" bit in the Holy Grail movie, where Graham Chapman's King Arthur tells the proto-communist peasants to shut up :)

Help! Help! I'm Being Repressed

97 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:34:25pm

re: #47 Russkilitlover

But it creates such a serendipitous situation to have us bickering amongst ourselves vis-a-via creationism, ID, evolution. We'll keep hammering each other and before we know it....Sharia! End of all discussions.

I don't think that joining hands with Christian anti-science religious irrationalists and singing Kum Ba Ya with them will protect us from Islamic anti-science religious irrationalists, or from religious irrationalism in general, any more than I think that joining hands with eurofascists and singing Kum Ba Ya with them will protect us from Islamofascists, or from fascism in general.

98 Purple Prose  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:35:20pm

re: #64 Lynn B.

You're right, of course. Charles really should start getting up to speed on that whole Islamism/CAIR thing 'cause clearly this is news to him...

/oy vey

None of the above. I just wish we'd have more opportunities to discuss the continuing - with no signs of abatement - onslaught of Islamism. The legal system will take care of ID/creationism, as we have seen it doing. It has scientific leg to stand on. The only thing that could change that is if vocal Islamists in different locales force the issue. Then it takes on a new dimension. Not only is political correctness engaged, but the very real threat that judges and many other public officials, as well as craven administrators in schools and universities, will capitulate. We have no problem as a society standing up to Christian fundamentalism, if it is irrational, but we DO have a problem standing up to Islamic fundamentalism. It's partly political correctness and multiculturalism and partly a real fear that, if as an individual you stand up against it, you and your family will be under threat. They've got us in a double bind, using both tolerance and fear of violence against us. That is what will kill the teaching of evolution, along with, ultimately, the worship of any God but Allah, well before all the Christian IDer extremists can impose anything upon society. We have to focus on what the most direct and immediate threat is.

99 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:36:17pm

re: #84 Salem

I hope Charles posts about whatever the hell he wants to post about. Some of you don't seem to recognize how much of a responsibility it is to update a blog everyday.

It's his blog/site. He can post whatever he wants to. Never said he shouldn't. I am curious to know if the target in these sorts of stories are "creationists", or the story of creation in the Bible, or both. Is the effort to counter the teaching of evolution in public schools with the teaching of "creationism" the objectionable thing here, or is the idea of creation itself the offender?

100 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:36:42pm

re: #81 Sharmuta

But do you know what I quoted? it's driving me crazy now until I find it. I'll be up half the night and probably have really weird dreams!

101 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:37:58pm
A fossil hunter who supports intelligent design...

Isn't that a bit like a criminal justice major supporting sharia law? Okay, bad analogy. How about a mosquito that supports deet?


“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,”

Wow. Just. Wow.

spear-it (spirit)

evil-utionist = ape-iest = malarki-ologist

a “scientist” sighs... then tests

... there are NO PERKS in purgatory

Life is a short story with a L o n g e n d i n g.

You can’t get to Heaven with deeds alone - What you will need is a real understanding of abstracts.

Loses points in the poetry competition, but gains a few in abstract thought. Specifically, two points:

b: difficult to understand
c: insufficiently factual

102 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:38:33pm

re: #90 mfarmer1

A 58 year old fossil hunter taking college courses...

You're never too old to learn something new.

103 Purple Prose  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:38:37pm

re: #73 Salamantis

I apologize for updinging you. You usually do so much better than this post.

This blog can walk the anti-jihadist walk and chew the pro-science gum at the same time.

It's not that. It's just a ratio thing. The ratio of one type of thread to another. It's also a preference thing. We evolved by evolution, and I believe in that. However, my greatest fear for our society is less a bunch of ID/creationists and much more a bunch of far-better funded and organized and legally protected Islamists.

104 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:38:40pm

re: #73 Salamantis
"And Islamocreationism and the domestic Christian variety have recently become bedfellows."
Really? I remember Charles putting up a thread about some idiots from the DI, forgive me for repeating myself, were talking to and maybe gettng money from Islamic Creationists.
But here I sit, a self-avowed and unashamed Christian, a believer in God, Jesus Christ and evolution and I'm opposed to teaching any kind of religion in Public Schools and yet you would put ME in league with Islamocrationists (that you would put me in bed with the ID/Creationsists is bad enough)?

105 kay1212  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:39:41pm

Hey I was actually born and raised in Kansas. When I was there, the schools didn't teach noahsarkeology like the fossil hunter is attempting to but I see they tried to get creationism installed in the intervening years. It's great that there's a return to science and sanity in my home state.

106 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:39:50pm

re: #99 cslepage

I think with most of us it's the cloaking of pseudo science terms around a philosophy. Nothing wrong with the creation story in any venue EXCEPT a science classroom. The problem with shills like the Discovery Institute they want a story treated as hard core science.

107 pat  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:40:45pm

Am I the only one in America that thinks Paris Hilton's ad proves she is a dimwit? The fact that she is smarter than Obama is not a surprise, but the thought this fool thinks her condescending view of white haired men (dad?) amounts to an argument is mind boggling.

108 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:41:00pm

I wish we could come up with some type of time machine, something where we could see into the past. Perhaps something that could show what the universe was like say 17 million years ago.

Like a Telescope

109 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:41:05pm

re: #65 cslepage

I believe in the literal story of creation in Genesis. And, the first Chapter of Genesis describes a firmament that contains the planets and the stars, and the firmament the birds fly in. It's not precisely a layer between two things, and it's not a single item. The Bible describes three types of "heavens": one, this planet's atmosphere, two, the universe, and three, Heaven.

And the contents of the genes of all living things testify to their evolutionary divergence from a common ancestry, not their separate creation as is in 6 days, just as radiometrically dated fossils and rocks and the light from distant stars and the red shift of the Big Bang echo testify to 2+ billion year old terrestrial life, a 4.6 billion year old earth, and a 13.7 billion year old universe, not something only 6000 years old.

110 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:41:08pm

re: #92 IslandLibertarian
Ah, thanks - I shoulda been able to figure that out - it's been used out here often enough!

And Peace right back atcha!

111 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:41:18pm

re: #105 kay1212

It's great that there's a return to science and sanity in my home state.

I don't accept evolution as evidence of "sane science" anymore than I do global warming.

112 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:41:20pm

re: #82 Killian Bundy

/by all means, say something else really stupid

Discovery Institute Creationism as propagated by the Intelligent Design tactic leads to the same social conclusion as the Taliban does. If you consider yourself a Creationist and can't separate yourself from the Discovery Institute. I can't help yah. Young Earth Creationist's who ply themselves against evolution exist to be embarassed.

The many offended commentors in evolution threads who are just attracted to the propoganda of the words "intelligent design" and then assume the Discovery Institute is all cake and ice cream are sour people indeed. It's a message that bears repeating.

It's fine to want more spirituality in society. ID is not "The Way". People who attach themselves to ID should be viewed with some suspicion. As evidenced by their nefarious activitites in the political and educational system.

If you are an ID supporter shame on you for being dishonest. :-)

113 maddogg  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:41:52pm

re: #107 pat

Am I the only one in America that thinks Paris Hilton's ad proves she is a dimwit? The fact that she is smarter than Obama is not a surprise, but the thought this fool thinks her condescending view of white haired men (dad?) amounts to an argument is mind boggling.

She has damn good legs, that rates some consideration with me:)

114 mfarmer1  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:42:02pm

re: #102 cslepage

You're never too old to learn something new.

That would be fine if he was running for County Fossil Catcher.

115 Killgore Trout  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:42:35pm

re: #101 Slumbering Behemoth

“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,”

Buddha, Jesus and Mohammed may be less because there's no historical proof that any of them ever existed but real people are about 98% chimp.

116 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:42:37pm

re: #111 cslepage

I don't accept evolution as evidence of "sane science" anymore than I do global warming.

But literal Biblical creation is "sane science", huh?

117 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:42:56pm

re: #98 Purple Prose

Really, PP, I don't think you'll find a blog anywhere that offers "more opportunities to discuss the continuing - with no signs of abatement - onslaught of Islamism" than LGF. And most of the ones that come close haven't been doing it for nearly as long.

But regardless ...

As many times as it's been said, I guess it needs to be said again. This is Charles' blog. He gets to decide what to post here and how often to post about it. What part of that is so difficult to understand that it has to be reiterated just about every day?

118 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:43:03pm

re: #95 Palandine Yeah, thanks - IslandLibertarian was kind enough to explain it to me at #92!

119 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:43:53pm

re: #104 realwest

Teaching any kind of religious "human beginnings" in a non-scientific realm just begs for zealotry, does it not?

120 pat  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:44:22pm

re: #113 maddogg

Not my type. I prefer the full package. This girl is a few burgers less than a Take Out.

121 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:44:24pm

re: #100 Russkilitlover

Wish I could help, but you've stumped me too.

122 Palandine  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:44:45pm

re: #99 cslepage

Oh, Charles HATES Christians and Jews who believe in the
Bible. That's why he's so supportive of Israel, and why he's spent the past SEVEN YEARS pointing out the Islamofascist threat, multiple times, every day, for free. It was all a clever ruse to draw people in and then BLAMMO! reveal his evil, anti-Christian and anti-Jewish hatreds.

/that new thing called sarcasm

cslepage, there's been a metric crapton of these threads, which have made very clear that Charles has a problem with teaching what is essentially a religious belief in public schools. That is all. Read and learn, and if the posts offend you, don't read them.

I agree with Salem above--the reason I never started a blog is because I am incapable of providing the free ice cream multiple times a day. I am in awe of folks like Charles, and James Lileks, who produce astonishing quality, every day, for free.

123 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:45:02pm

re: #12 Sharmuta

Oh, damn. And I was looking so forward to Purgatory perks. I'm crushed!

You don't get Purgatory Perks unless you are in the business of buying/selling indulgences.

Algore seems to have a lock on carbon indulgences, but I imagine a good competitor could edge him out. ;)

124 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:45:13pm

re: #87 hazzyday

Hmmm until I know someone well i take them literally at their printed word. You can't claim sarcasm post snark unless you /sarc'd yourself.

I can untroll someone once I know them better if they started out trolling.

Who better to take literally than a Biblical Genesis literalist?

125 mfarmer1  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:45:23pm

re: #107 pat

Am I the only one in America that thinks Paris Hilton's ad proves she is a dimwit? The fact that she is smarter than Obama is not a surprise, but the thought this fool thinks her condescending view of white haired men (dad?) amounts to an argument is mind boggling.


I can't stand her, don't give a twit about her, and I'm still trying to figure out why anyone else cares either.

However, I thought the bit was very funny.

126 Lynn B.  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:45:44pm

re: #99 cslepage

It's his blog/site. He can post whatever he wants to. Never said he shouldn't. I am curious to know if the target in these sorts of stories are "creationists", or the story of creation in the Bible, or both. Is the effort to counter the teaching of evolution in public schools with the teaching of "creationism" the objectionable thing here, or is the idea of creation itself the offender?

Why is it that the people who seem to be most acutely sensitive to the number of anti-ID posts here seem to be the most clueless as to their content?

The answers to your questions would be abundantly clear if you bothered to actually read the threads you're complaining about. Or even the disclaimer that appears at the top of many of them.

128 maddogg  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:46:33pm

re: #120 pat

Not my type. I prefer the full package. This girl is a few burgers less than a Take Out.

Yeah, but she has damn good legs!

129 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:46:34pm

re: #123 Slumbering Behemoth

You don't get Purgatory Perks unless you are in the business of buying/selling indulgences.

Huh- I thought that's exactly what sharmutas did. ;)

130 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:46:43pm

re: #99 cslepage FWIW, I've always understood it to mean the teaching of ID/Creationism as a "science" course or as part of a science course in public or taxpayer assisted schools.
And that I am very firmly against.
I don't really care what other people feel in their hearts, unless of course what they feel threatens me or mine.

131 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:46:56pm

re: #112 hazzyday

Discovery Institute Creationism as propagated by the Intelligent Design tactic leads to the same social conclusion as the Taliban does.

Prattle on Chicken Little.

/hysterical idiocy is nothing to be proud of

132 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:47:13pm

re: #122 Palandine

I agree with Salem above--the reason I never started a blog is because I am incapable of providing the free ice cream multiple times a day.


WTH!

You guys are getting ice cream? Where's the line for that? I want some.

133 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:48:18pm

re: #108 Racer X

I wish we could come up with some type of time machine, something where we could see into the past. Perhaps something that could show what the universe was like say 17 million years ago.

I have asked myself where I would like to go in history (if I was guaranteed a way back) and one of the places was the time of Christ's life, just to know.
Until then, I have to live through Christopher Moore's imagination of "Lamb, The Gospel according to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal."

134 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:49:31pm

re: #132 Racer X

WTH!

You guys are getting ice cream? Where's the line for that? I want some.

I don't know about ice cream, but there's always fruitcup at 0200 hrs PST.

/oh yeah and sunday buffet specials.

135 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:50:05pm

re: #98 Purple Prose

None of the above. I just wish we'd have more opportunities to discuss the continuing - with no signs of abatement - onslaught of Islamism. The legal system will take care of ID/creationism, as we have seen it doing. It has scientific leg to stand on. The only thing that could change that is if vocal Islamists in different locales force the issue. Then it takes on a new dimension. Not only is political correctness engaged, but the very real threat that judges and many other public officials, as well as craven administrators in schools and universities, will capitulate. We have no problem as a society standing up to Christian fundamentalism, if it is irrational, but we DO have a problem standing up to Islamic fundamentalism. It's partly political correctness and multiculturalism and partly a real fear that, if as an individual you stand up against it, you and your family will be under threat. They've got us in a double bind, using both tolerance and fear of violence against us. That is what will kill the teaching of evolution, along with, ultimately, the worship of any God but Allah, well before all the Christian IDer extremists can impose anything upon society. We have to focus on what the most direct and immediate threat is.

The most immediate threat is that the selfsame Christian creationists who are behind the scenes getting laws like the one in Louisiana passed are the very ones who are networking with Islamocreationists in the Middle East. Wake up and smell the Turkish tobacco and the chicory coffee!

136 Palandine  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:50:11pm

re: #132 Racer X

Sub-basement 3B, Denver International Airport.

The password is "Regis"--the name of Ambassador John Bolton's mustache.

137 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:50:34pm

re: #127 The Other Les

Moonbat of the Day:

Woman in Northern California has never seen a rainbow caused by a lawn sprinkler, blames evil conspiracy.

What a moron!

Bwahahahaha!

That is the funniest video I have ever seen!

138 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:51:19pm

re: #133 Russkilitlover

I have asked myself where I would like to go in history (if I was guaranteed a way back) and one of the places was the time of Christ's life, just to know.
Until then, I have to live through Christopher Moore's imagination of "Lamb, The Gospel according to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal."

I you went back to the time of Christ you would most likely die as the average life span was probably 35 years old

139 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:51:26pm

re: #106 BlueCanuck
With all due respect my friend, I'd druther not see religion of any type taught in public or otherwise taxpayer assisted schools, regardless of whether or not it's part of "science" or anything else (I am, of course, excluding philosophy courses which - mature soul that I am - I recall only being taught in colleges or Universities).

140 IslandLibertarian  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:52:31pm

re: #133 Russkilitlover

I have asked myself where I would like to go in history (if I was guaranteed a way back) and one of the places was the time of Christ's life, just to know.

You are living in the time of Christ, but his name is Barack........

141 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:52:57pm

re: #136 Palandine

Sub-basement 3B, Denver International Airport.

The password is "Regis"--the name of Ambassador John Bolton's mustache.

Thank you thank you thank you!

I am over in sector 42 sub-basement 5 now. I'll come over in about 10 minutes. Save me some?

142 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:53:33pm

re: #99 cslepage

It's his blog/site. He can post whatever he wants to. Never said he shouldn't. I am curious to know if the target in these sorts of stories are "creationists", or the story of creation in the Bible, or both. Is the effort to counter the teaching of evolution in public schools with the teaching of "creationism" the objectionable thing here, or is the idea of creation itself the offender?

The attempt to force the public schools to indoctrinate other peoples' kids into sectarian religious dogmas in public high school science classes is the issue. Like they tried to do in Kansas (this post addresses that). Like they tried to do in Pennnsylvania (this has been extensively discussed onsite). Like they are presently trying to do in Louisiana (the law passage and Jindal signage that began these discussions).

143 pat  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:53:50pm

re: #108 Racer X

I wish we could come up with some type of time machine, something where we could see into the past. Perhaps something that could show what the universe was like say 17 million years ago.

Like a Telescope


I am outlining an article for a mere 25,000 years back in my locale. Info slowly coming in . Quite difficult, particularly the botany. It actually might take 4 or 5 years to write 3,000 words accurately. Fascinating really.

144 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:54:07pm

re: #114 mfarmer1
ROTFL!

145 Pawn of the Oppressor  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:54:33pm

re: #133 Russkilitlover

I have asked myself where I would like to go in history (if I was guaranteed a way back) and one of the places was the time of Christ's life, just to know.
Until then, I have to live through Christopher Moore's imagination of "Lamb, The Gospel according to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal."

I'm no Christian but I find myself agreeing with your choice. Aside from the real historical Jesus being around, those were interesting times. Israel under the Romans would be worth visiting.

My second choice would be a toss-up between Europe in the latter half of the 18th century, or to be along with the first explorers of "The New World", so I could see what America looked like before it was settled.

146 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:55:10pm

re: #135 Salamantis

The most immediate threat is that the selfsame Christian creationists who are behind the scenes getting laws like the one in Louisiana passed are the very ones who are networking with Islamocreationists in the Middle East. Wake up and smell the Turkish tobacco and the chicory coffee!

How about the threat of evolutionists like yourself in bed with PC leftism that is Really in bed with Islamist terrorists'?

147 rightwinger3  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:55:29pm

re: #137 Racer X

Bwahahahaha!

That is the funniest video I have ever seen!

ROFL. I believe the sirens in the video were the guys in white coats coming with the straight jacket.

148 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:55:50pm

re: #116 Sharmuta

But literal Biblical creation is "sane science", huh?

Let's reread this: "And the contents of the genes of all living things testify to their evolutionary divergence from a common ancestry, not their separate creation as is in 6 days, just as radiometrically dated fossils and rocks and the light from distant stars and the red shift of the Big Bang echo testify to 2+ billion year old terrestrial life, a 4.6 billion year old earth, and a 13.7 billion year old universe, not something only 6000 years old."

Given that no one here can prove to me we have accurately viewed and understood the contents of the genes of all living things, fossils, lights from distant stars, etc. ; given that we take what is believed in that paragraph as the truth based upon our faith in those who do the research and announce the findings, even though it's all only as good as the latest declaration, as in, we were entering a period of global cooling until we decided it must be global warming; I'd rather put my faith in something more substantial, in something that has better evidence backing it up and has produced better results.

If that makes me "irrational", so be it. I'll still gladly defend this country against the forces that want to destroy this country, side by side with any of you.

149 The Other Les  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:55:53pm

re: #137 Racer X

Bwahahahaha!

That is the funniest video I have ever seen!

Seriously, making rainbows was the best part of watering the lawn when I was growing up.

150 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:55:58pm

re: #131 Killian Bundy

Prattle on Chicken Little.

/hysterical idiocy is nothing to be proud of

Lol i am sorry if that hits close to home. ID fits very well with Taliban type excitment. It has nothing to do with history. All with what they both want done and how they want to do it.

151 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:56:41pm

re: #138 drmark

I you went back to the time of Christ you would most likely die as the average life span was probably 35 years old

But as a woman in her....ahem...mid-forties, with no children, my odds for survival are pretty good! In any case I would love to visit that time just to answer my own, numerous, questions. Oh, and as part of the deal, I would want a one-on-one hour "interview" with Jesus. Is that asking too much?

152 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:57:19pm

re: #132 Racer X

Actually we get vouchers for Ben and Jerry's with every Zionist check.

153 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:57:20pm

re: #146 drmark

Reason and Freedom have many enemies. We should stand opposed to any and all of them, for I think both Reason and Freedom are intricately tied together. How can Freedom survive without Reason?

154 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:57:41pm

re: #139 realwest

True, and you are right of course. But I have it seen used as a literature supplement at times. Proverbs and Psalms are perfect in that aspect.

155 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:58:21pm

re: #145 Pawn of the Oppressor

Well, just keep your smallpox virus under wraps. I hear that it will be blamed for all future ills! LOL!

156 Pawn of the Oppressor  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:58:35pm

re: #146 drmark

How about the threat of evolutionists like yourself in bed with PC leftism that is Really in bed with Islamist terrorists'?

Ah yes, the Secular God-Hating Bogeyman and his evil Morality-Destroying Science.

Hint: the guy who's influence you want to remove from the world was named "Jean-Jacques Rousseau", not "Charles Darwin". See also: French Revolution, Romanticism.

157 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:59:21pm

re: #152 ggt

Actually we get vouchers for Ben and Jerry's with every Zionist check.

Lucky dog, we only get Baskin and Robbins up here.

/BTW where's my latest zionist conspiracy cheque. :)

158 wolfie  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:59:27pm

re: #143 pat

I am outlining an article for a mere 25,000 years back in my locale. Info slowly coming in . Quite difficult, particularly the botany. It actually might take 4 or 5 years to write 3,000 words accurately. Fascinating really.


That sounds VERY intriguing.

159 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:59:31pm

re: #78 Charles

Hi Charles,

I'm afraid the big tent you were able to maintain for your WOT focus is going to get a bit smaller with your new emphasis on the evolution issue. It's a wedge issue for those that have hitherto backed you; I imagine even some of the more orthodox Jews will be uncomfortable. Not that I think you should try to please all of the people all of the time.... and as a secular Zionist and scientist I happen to be on your side on this one.

Moe

160 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:59:36pm

re: #126 Lynn B.

Why is it that the people who seem to be most acutely sensitive to the number of anti-ID posts here seem to be the most clueless as to their content?

The answers to your questions would be abundantly clear if you bothered to actually read the threads you're complaining about. Or even the disclaimer that appears at the top of many of them.

Isn't this the way Obama reacts when someone disgrees with him?

/that new thing called sarcasm

161 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:59:38pm

re: #145 Pawn of the Oppressor

14-15th century Florence or 1200 -Naples.

162 The Other Les  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 9:59:44pm

re: #147 rightwinger3

ROFL. I believe the sirens in the video were the guys in white coats coming with the straight jacket.



They're coming to take me away, hah ha!

163 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:00:12pm

re: #151 Russkilitlover

re: #151 Russkilitlover

But as a woman in her....ahem...mid-forties, with no children, my odds for survival are pretty good! In any case I would love to visit that time just to answer my own, numerous, questions. Oh, and as part of the deal, I would want a one-on-one hour "interview" with Jesus. Is that asking too much?

A daily relationship with Jesus Today through the Holy Spirit and you can ask all the questions you like.....

164 solomonpanting  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:00:38pm
#138 drmark

re: #133 Russkilitlover

I have asked myself where I would like to go in history (if I was guaranteed a way back) and one of the places was the time of Christ's life, just to know.
Until then, I have to live through Christopher Moore's imagination of "Lamb, The Gospel according to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal."

I you went back to the time of Christ you would most likely die as the average life span was probably 35 years old

Perhaps you missed the highlighted portion?

165 maddogg  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:01:18pm

re: #159 Moe Katz

Therein lies the difference between a man of principle and a politician.

166 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:01:24pm

re: #103 Purple Prose

It's not that. It's just a ratio thing. The ratio of one type of thread to another. It's also a preference thing. We evolved by evolution, and I believe in that. However, my greatest fear for our society is less a bunch of ID/creationists and much more a bunch of far-better funded and organized and legally protected Islamists.

Check the ratios. When issues relating to Islam, terrorism, Iraq, Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, etc. come up, they are addressed. It sounds to me like you are complaining less about those issues being neglected (which they aren't being) than about this one also being addressed. It hasn't been an 'instead of' thing; it's been an 'in addition to' thing.

I remember the selfsame complaints being made when the LGF investigations into the connections between the eurofascists and the domestic racists began. Please don't shine a klieg on MY cockroaches; unlike those others, they are NICE and BENIGN bugs, HELPFUL, even, and don't deserve that nasty spotlight. And there's REALLY NOTHING to SEE here; just turn away and move along, please...

167 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:01:40pm

re: #164 solomonpanting

No

168 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:02:09pm

re: #157 BlueCanuck

I hear if you are ever in the area, Charles has a pretty nifty creamery and microbrewery in Sub-basement, er, well, you know.

169 Throbert McGee  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:02:44pm

re: #98 Purple Prose

None of the above. I just wish we'd have more opportunities to discuss the continuing - with no signs of abatement - onslaught of Islamism.

Oh. For. Pete's. Sake.

This is an open-comments blog with a minimalist degree of post hoc moderation applied in extreme cases of abuse -- meaning that if you find an online story about the onslaught of Islamism, you're allowed to post about it in ANY THREAD YOU WISH. You can even highlight the story by adding it to the Links Viewer at the top of the main page. In short, it's not really the shortage of "opportunities for discussion" that you're griping about, is it?

(Incidentally, I didn't notice you popping up in the recent zombietime thread to complain that photo essays on ultra-gay S&M toiletpig fetishists in San Francisco are an unnecessary distraction from the fight against Islamic jihad.)

170 solomonpanting  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:02:44pm

re: #167 drmark

No

Perhaps, then, you didn't understand the highlighted portion?

171 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:03:06pm

Facts:

Speed of light is 186,282.397 miles per second.

Telescopes can see light from other galaxies that are millions of years old. No carbon dating necessary.

Is it really that much of a stretch to conclude Earth is closer to 4.5 billion years old? Or did the creator do Earth just recently, and all of those other galaxies mbillions of years ago?

172 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:03:06pm

re: #104 realwest

"And Islamocreationism and the domestic Christian variety have recently become bedfellows."
Really? I remember Charles putting up a thread about some idiots from the DI, forgive me for repeating myself, were talking to and maybe gettng money from Islamic Creationists.
But here I sit, a self-avowed and unashamed Christian, a believer in God, Jesus Christ and evolution and I'm opposed to teaching any kind of religion in Public Schools and yet you would put ME in league with Islamocrationists (that you would put me in bed with the ID/Creationsists is bad enough)?

In that case, you are not the domestic Christian variety of creationist, then are you? methinks you take offence when none is intended, if you truly are how you self-represent...

173 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:03:46pm

What's with the posters who have been around a long time and posted little? Is there a full moon?

174 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:03:55pm

re: #119 Russkilitlover
"Teaching any kind of religious "human beginnings" in a non-scientific realm just begs for zealotry, does it not?"
I don't know. I do know that while, for obvious reasons (the DI and all) we've focused pretty closely on the Christian aspect of it, but not so much on Hinduism, or Budhisim or for that matter Judaism, Atheism or Angosticism. Do you think teaching any "human beggings" in a non-scientific realm just begs for zealotry?

175 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:04:02pm

re: #163 drmark

re: #151 Russkilitlover

A daily relationship with Jesus Today through the Holy Spirit and you can ask all the questions you like.....

Asking questions is great - I do it all the time. But answers? Yeah, no so much from a holy spirit. This may be my own impediment to religious certainty, but it is a bigggie.

176 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:04:09pm

Really there is no better time in history than right here is my point.

And we have great access t e past as well..

177 Pawn of the Oppressor  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:04:31pm

re: #155 Russkilitlover

Well, just keep your smallpox virus under wraps. I hear that it will be blamed for all future ills! LOL!

Seriously, something like 90+% of the native population of the Americas was killed by disease, not the White Man... Well, not the White Man directly, anyway... Not at first.

Alan Weisman's
The World Without Us mentions a project in New York which is modeling the environs of Manhattan in its pre-European-settlement state. The first people to see the future site of NYC were Dutchmen, in 1604, and it was just a flat island with some trees... I'd love to see the U.S. as it was, affected perhaps only by native activity. Supposedly the Spanish explorers found grass as high as the bellies of their horses in the south. This of course makes me wonder what the southern plains looked like. Supposedly Theodore Roosevelt's books are good for descriptions of the plains.

178 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:04:39pm

re: #168 ggt

Mmmmm, microbrewery. Yummm. Going to have to start making a travel itinerary for next summer.

/southern BBQ in Memphis, terrorizing red on the left coast, touring the grand lizardoid base under Denver. . . . . . ..

179 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:05:39pm

What's with the posre: #173 ggt

Whats with the posters that have time to post 25,000 comments?

180 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:05:48pm

re: #168 ggt

I hear if you are ever in the area, Charles has a pretty nifty creamery and microbrewery in Sub-basement, er, well, you know.

Does he make chocolate chip mint ice cream? That way, I could be clueless, irrational, and well fed at the same time.

181 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:06:18pm

re: #111 cslepage

I don't accept evolution as evidence of "sane science" anymore than I do global warming.

Then you simply don't accept scientific evidence whatsoever, and make no distinctions between kinds. Global Warming theory has only been around for a few years, and already scientists are leaving it in droves, because the data doesn't support it; OTOH, a century and a half of data supports evolutionary theory, and there is not a single shred of credible empirical evidence against it.

182 Killgore Trout  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:07:09pm

Mr. Beaumont = Mr. Wolf

183 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:07:33pm

re: #169 Throbert McGee

you're allowed to post about it in ANY THREAD YOU WISH. You can even highlight the story by adding it to the Links Viewer at the top of the main page. In short, it's not really the shortage of "opportunities for discussion" that you're griping about, is it?

Absolutely! I really don't understand why the comments section for spinoff threads isn't utilized more by people not interested in this topic. There is no stopping anyone from starting their own thread about whatever topic the find suitable nor discussing that topic on a spinoff thread provided.

184 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:07:37pm

re: #175 Russkilitlover

Ask and you'll receive .. seek and yo'ull find .. Knock and the door will be opened..
Just be patient

185 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:07:43pm

re: #168 ggt

I hear if you are ever in the area, Charles has a pretty nifty creamery and microbrewery in Sub-basement, er, well, you know.

ixnay on the rewerybray.

That is for level 5 Lizards only.

Sorry.

186 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:07:50pm

re: #150 hazzyday

Lol i am sorry if that hits close to home. ID fits very well with Taliban type excitment. It has nothing to do with history. All with what they both want done and how they want to do it.

Look, those who believe in Creation have comprised a large segment of American society since it's inception. In fact, up until the early 20th century, Creation was taught as science. Did that lead to a Taliban like society? Ever since then, American society and public education has become more secular with time.

Name one public school district in the United States where ID/Creationism is currently taught as part of an approved science curriculum?

Take your time.

/or run around screaming "the sky is falling!" for all I care

187 Pvt Bin Jammin  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:07:58pm

re: #173 ggt

What's with the posters who have been around a long time and posted little? Is there a full moon?

No, actually I just came in from outside. It's one of those muslim looking moons.

188 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:08:04pm

re: #179 drmark

Well, let's see. ummmm, we know who they are. They don't come out of the dark with strongly worded posts and pick fights.

and mostly, well, I'd like to get to know you a bit before I start the BBQ.

189 Purple Prose  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:08:39pm

re: #117 Lynn B.

Yes, I know. I am just voicing an opinion about how much a threat creationism/ID is to a rational and free society compared to Islam. I am not advocating a reconciliation with creationists/IDers. You cannot reconcile with those who are irrational. My own opinion on the matter is that not only are we descended from apes but we are apes. We are a species of ape. That is science.

Nonetheless, I have no fear of creationists/IDers. They try as they might and gain no traction, as the present post demonstrates. We are in no danger of having rationalism overturned by those who believe in a literal and absolutist interpretation of the Bible. The Bible is a great book of moral truths that may stem directly from God or be inspired by God, but a literal interpretation of the Bible in a rigorous way is absurd. The world simply is not 5-6K years old, and we were not created as Adam and Even, with Cain and Abel as their offspring, Cain offing Abel, and then Cain somehow producing offspring with some unmentioned female. Obviously, this is absurd, and the courts of law and most school districts (even before it gets to any court of law) will reject this absurdity.

So I have no fear of creationism or ID. I do have a fear of Islamists. Why? They are protected by political correctness from direct public criticism and they have a huge group of organizations in the West and foreign money to back them. They are the only force that could overturn the teaching of science. The fact that some creationists/IDers have sought out Islamic partners is just a testament to the fact that Christian fundamentalist creationists/IDers know that they have lost the battle and can not possibly win it - unless the rules change.

Islamism is the only force that could fundamentally change the nature of our society.

Recently in the news, the story of an Aafia Siddiqui broke. She was an undergraduate at MIT and then earned a Ph.D. at Brandeis. Yet she went back to her home of Pakistan, but not to better that country. She slipped into Afghanistan and was caught with plans to commit terrorist acts and then went crazy on her captors.

That says it all. We can go to great lengths to try to introduce and educate Islamists to a better way of life, yet it's all for naught. In fact, they seem to become radicalized in the West. That is a topic for discussion.

190 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:08:44pm

re: #180 cslepage

You'd have to ask him.

191 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:08:47pm

re: #132 Racer X
Don't be silly my friend! No one is standing in line for ice cream.
It's usually delivered promptly to us as we type away on our computers. Well, except for those few who type away while nude! Um, say you don't......!

192 maddogg  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:08:59pm

re: #181 Salamantis

The sad thing is that scientists supported Global Warming without evidence in the first place. It means they are subject to influence by their prejudices, just like any person walking down the street, and they did not learn the first rule of the scientific method.

193 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:09:19pm

re: #187 Pvt Bin Jammin

ah!

194 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:09:30pm

re: #46 cslepage

I think the Bush administration has been too successful against terrorism. I used to be able to count on coming here and reading story after story about terrorists, radical muslims, etc. Now I come here and almost always find a story about "creationism." Oh well.

You should probably read my analysis here.

To build on that, there is just one post on the front page dealing with "creationism" (this one here dealing only loosely with creationism itself, and more so with the electorate of Kansas reacting to the political agenda of creationists). How a about current front page breakdown, please correct me if I am missing something:

Islam related: 9 posts
Open Thread/Picture related: 8 posts
POTUS Election related: 6 posts
Tech related: 3 posts
Music related: 1 post
Domestic Terrorism related: 1 post
Russian Author related: 1 post
Creationism related: 1 post
Evolution related: 1 post

Maybe you're just having a hard time seeing all the other posts here?

195 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:09:57pm

re: #174 realwest

"Teaching any kind of religious "human beginnings" in a non-scientific realm just begs for zealotry, does it not?"
I don't know. I do know that while, for obvious reasons (the DI and all) we've focused pretty closely on the Christian aspect of it, but not so much on Hinduism, or Budhisim or for that matter Judaism, Atheism or Angosticism. Do you think teaching any "human beggings" in a non-scientific realm just begs for zealotry?

Well yes, yes I do. And for such reasons, these questions should be left to the spiritual realm provided by the church(es) and/or other beliefs, and not

196 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:10:31pm

re: #185 Racer X

sorry, I forgot.

No alcohol guys, only ice cream.

197 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:11:23pm

re: #188 ggt

Point taken

198 Sharmuta  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:12:08pm

re: #189 Purple Prose

But islamists are themselves creationists.

199 ggt  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:13:01pm

Well, Lizards, I have to sleep.

weet dreams!

200 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:13:07pm

re: #145 Pawn of the Oppressor Mmmmm - I think my first choice woud to be back in the early 1800's with the Mountain Men and Trappers who saw some of the magnficience of this great nation before anyone except the First Americans.

201 FamHistoryGuy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:13:26pm

re: #47 Russkilitlover

It does not matter the identity or intent of the thugs assaulting the castle walls, you have to be prepared to repel them all. And by the appropriate means for each one.

202 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:13:31pm

re: #188 ggt

You do.nt need to BBQ I am old and done already......

203 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:14:16pm

re: #191 realwest

Um, say you don't......!


LOL!

Sure - I'll say that.

204 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:14:38pm

Night ggt, weet dreams.

205 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:16:10pm

re: #150 hazzyday
Sorry, I know you asked that of Killian, but I'd like to sorta jump in hear: " ID fits very well with Taliban type excitment."
Do you really believe that?

206 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:16:10pm

re: #185 Racer X

ixnay on the rewerybray.

That is for level 5 Lizards only.

Sorry.

What's a level 5 Lizard, and how does one qualify?

/might have to work harder.

207 cslepage  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:16:32pm

re: #189 Purple Prose

My own opinion on the matter is that not only are we descended from apes but we are apes. We are a species of ape. That is science.

So I'm not so much half chimpanzee as much as I am 100% ape?

I'm glad we cleared that up.

208 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:16:37pm

re: #146 drmark

How about the threat of evolutionists like yourself in bed with PC leftism that is Really in bed with Islamist terrorists'?

How about your following the Disco Institute's Wedge Document strategy to a 'T', and engaging in lying and gratuitous slander and slimage? But of course anyone who uses the term 'evolutionist' has already given their Genesis literalist creationist agenda away...

It's not US evolution sites that are linking with |islamocreationists like Harun Yahya and sending people over to attend and speak at their conferences; it's creationist political front organizations like the Disco Institute and the Institute for Creation Resmirch.

209 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:17:26pm

re: #151 Russkilitlover
Whooo! Could I be your camerman?!

210 Throbert McGee  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:18:23pm

re: #133 Russkilitlover

I have asked myself where I would like to go in history (if I was guaranteed a way back) and one of the places was the time of Christ's life, just to know.

Sounds like a pretty cool idea until you get back to the present and discover that Jesus Christ is now being worshipped as a voluptuous naked cyborg-woman with the head of a great white shark and titanium claws for hands -- all because you accidentally squished a butterfly during the Sermon on the Mount.

Sheesh, have we learned nothing from Ray Bradbury and The Simpsons?

211 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:18:50pm

re: #177 Pawn of the Oppressor

Seriously, something like 90+% of the native population of the Americas was killed by disease, not the White Man... Well, not the White Man directly, anyway... Not at first.

Alan Weisman's
The World Without Us mentions a project in New York which is modeling the environs of Manhattan in its pre-European-settlement state. The first people to see the future site of NYC were Dutchmen, in 1604, and it was just a flat island with some trees... I'd love to see the U.S. as it was, affected perhaps only by native activity. Supposedly the Spanish explorers found grass as high as the bellies of their horses in the south. This of course makes me wonder what the southern plains looked like. Supposedly Theodore Roosevelt's books are good for descriptions of the plains.

Spanish explores, such as Cortez first landed in Mexico, where the native population thought horses to be gods and specifically slaughtered them to minimize Spanish "shock and awe." It took the plains American Indians to see the horse's value as a guerrilla warfare weapon. By the time the Spanish got to what is now the US, the native population had figured out how to domesticate and utilize the horse.

212 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:19:05pm

How is hat a threat to yo and me?

213 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:19:27pm

re: #154 BlueCanuck
"I have it seen used as a literature supplement at times". Well that settles it I guess, I am officially OLD.
Fuck.

214 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:20:27pm

re: #206 BlueCanuck

What's a level 5 Lizard, and how does one qualify?

/might have to work harder.

Give that Lizard a cold beer!

Thats what I'm talkin about. Opportunity presents itself and right away the response is what can I do to get it? How can I work harder to achieve something worth while. You clearly demonstrate the qualities of a level 5 Lizard.

I'll put in a good word with your supervisor.

215 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:21:57pm

re: #148 cslepage

Let's reread this: "And the contents of the genes of all living things testify to their evolutionary divergence from a common ancestry, not their separate creation as is in 6 days, just as radiometrically dated fossils and rocks and the light from distant stars and the red shift of the Big Bang echo testify to 2+ billion year old terrestrial life, a 4.6 billion year old earth, and a 13.7 billion year old universe, not something only 6000 years old."

Given that no one here can prove to me we have accurately viewed and understood the contents of the genes of all living things, fossils, lights from distant stars, etc. ; given that we take what is believed in that paragraph as the truth based upon our faith in those who do the research and announce the findings, even though it's all only as good as the latest declaration, as in, we were entering a period of global cooling until we decided it must be global warming; I'd rather put my faith in something more substantial, in something that has better evidence backing it up and has produced better results.

If that makes me "irrational", so be it. I'll still gladly defend this country against the forces that want to destroy this country, side by side with any of you.

Common ancestry has proven to be true beyond rational statistical disputation for all the genomes we have so far decoded, both the genes themselves and the artifactual retroviral DNA sequences embedded inside them. And those genes remain in the genome, checkable and recheckable at will, while meteorological data changes more rapidly.

BTW: you don't like the results of evolutionary theory? Gene-splicing bacteria so that they produce medicines, or devour oil slicks? Inserting a Vitamin-A-producing gene sequence into the rice genome, so the grain contains Vitamin A, and millions of impoverished rice-eating kids don't grow up with rickets?

216 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:22:15pm

re: #214 Racer X

Thank you for that. ;)

217 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:23:29pm

It seems you promote Evolution... So what title would you prefer? Rather than Evolutionist.... My apologies.

218 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:24:34pm

re: #184 drmark

Ask and you'll receive .. seek and yo'ull find .. Knock and the door will be opened..
Just be patient

Okayyyy. That's so very helpful. Thanks. I just have always asked "why?" since I was knee high to an ant. Much to the consternation of my parents, but there you go.

219 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:24:42pm

re: #159 Moe Katz

Hi Charles,

I'm afraid the big tent you were able to maintain for your WOT focus is going to get a bit smaller with your new emphasis on the evolution issue. It's a wedge issue for those that have hitherto backed you; I imagine even some of the more orthodox Jews will be uncomfortable. Not that I think you should try to please all of the people all of the time.... and as a secular Zionist and scientist I happen to be on your side on this one.

Moe

It's a wedge issue for a small and fanatical minority of those...

Fixed that for ya.

220 Archimedes  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:25:04pm

Props to news reporter Jon Ralston, of Las Vegas Now Eyewitness News. A msm reporter who actually challenged Obama in an interview. We need to support these guys when they show up.

This is from Rush's website.

[Link: www.rushlimbaugh.com...]
Excerpt:

RALSTON: Maybe if there's a crisis in the future with nuclear waste storage, maybe you'll just say to Nevadans, "Well, I was against Yucca Mountain, but guess what? Now I'm for it."

OBAMA: No, well, the -- the -- eh, eh, eh, uh, uh... You know, I -- I -- Jon, don't put words in my mouth or anticipate what I'm going to do. I've been opposed to Yucca Mountain from the start. So if the suggestion is John McCain, who is in favor of Yucca right now, should get a pass on that --

RALSTON: I didn't say that!

OBAMA: -- whereas -- whereas -- where -- whereas I (arrogant laugh) who am adamantly opposed to it, somehow might be second-guessed, I think that doesn't make sense.

221 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:25:06pm

re: #186 Killian Bundy

Look, those who believe in Creation have comprised a large segment of American society since it's inception. In fact, up until the early 20th century, Creation was taught as science. Did that lead to a Taliban like society? Ever since then, American society and public education has become more secular with time.

Name one public school district in the United States where ID/Creationism is currently taught as part of an approved science curriculum?

Take your time.

/or run around screaming "the sky is falling!" for all I care

Ahh finally you wish to write something I can reply to. :-)

The Discovery Institute/Young Earther Creationist/ID folks have been in court several times as documented in the Ken Miller's video'
s in threads posted here. It's not for lack of trying. They are at the doors of our schools constantly the past few years.

When you say Creation then you do mean "young earth creationism" and you don't believe in evolution then? Since you are a long time lizard I will try and be more respective of your stated views. I have relatives that are yec'rs and I love them a lot. I try and avoid the conversation.

I have to laugh at myself. I pride myself on being a tolerant religious person. But the more and more I read about ID and DI, I just get the heebie jeebie's. They are becoming like troofers to me, I just want to meet one in public and laugh at them. I know I will pay in hell for it.

222 Racer X  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:25:13pm

re: #210 Throbert McGee

LOL!

Isn't right here, right now really the place to be? We have all of this technology that allows humans to see just about any place on the planet. There are means to go visit just about any place on the planet, and very soon places a little farther away than our planet.

Life is good Right Here, Right Now

223 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:25:28pm

re: #218 Russkilitlover

Okayyyy. That's so very helpful. Thanks. I just have always asked "why?" since I was knee high to an ant. Much to the consternation of my parents, but there you go.

Are you being sarcastic?

224 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:27:21pm

re: #172 Salamantis
"methinks you take offence when none is intended, if you truly are how you self-represent..."
Now I have to hand it to you, that's probably the coolest way to suggest someone is a liar I've ever heard. Regretfully for you, I am not a liar.
Perhaps you ought to go back and read what you said - try to do it objectively, hard though that may be for any of us to do with our own writings - and see if no offense was intended with what you wrote.

225 solomonpanting  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:27:36pm

re: #184 drmark

Ask and you'll receive .. seek and yo'ull find .. Knock and the door will be opened..
Just be patient

You Don't Knock

226 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:27:37pm

re: #219 Salamantis

It's a wedge issue for a small and fanatical minority of those...


Very nice. And your evidence for this belief is?

227 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:27:56pm

re: #209 realwest

Whooo! Could I be your camerman?!

Well, hubby is the professional photog in the family so he gets first dibs, but if he lacks the will for such an endeavor, then Heck Yeah! We'll go.

228 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:28:25pm

re: #225 solomonpanting

Awesome

229 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:29:25pm

re: #210 Throbert McGee

ROFLMAO! I shouldn't have swatted that #@W$% butterfly!

230 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:30:07pm

re: #173 ggt Nope, no full moon - either just folks who haven't had much to say in all the time they've been registered, or they are folks who are either sockpuppets or people who wait for one particular thread - and not necessarily ID/Creationist threads - I've seen them come out of the woodwork on many other types of threads, especially all the threads on the European Fascists.

231 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:30:24pm

re: #223 drmark

Are you being sarcastic?

Yes and no.

232 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:30:36pm

re: #229 Russkilitlover

Your Avatar looks like my Black Lab

233 Nadnerb  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:31:01pm

What the creationists fail to understand is that evolution might be evidence of a beginning-something put forth by God and set into motion without a particular roadmap toward the place we are now. This re-writing of definitions is a perfect example of how creationists attempt to alter, propagate and influence the people in their flock. You can see, on a smaller scale how they're doing this. The existence of evolution as a scientific fact is itself evidence of the freewill of mankind. It is also evidence of evolutionary freewill for organisms as set forth by Him.

234 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:31:35pm

re: #219 Salamantis

It's a wedge issue for a small and fanatical minority of those...

Fixed that for ya.

A small minority of about one-half?

235 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:32:02pm

re: #179 drmark Well some of us have life-threatening illnesses and don't work and find it difficult to "get out and play"; others, I suspect, have very, ah forgiving, employers.

236 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:32:11pm

re: #84 Salem

I hope Charles posts about whatever the hell he wants to post about. Some of you don't seem to recognize how much of a responsibility it is to update a blog everyday. The Innertubes are clogged with blogs that haven't been updated for years. Maintaining enthusiasm for the same topic day in and day out must be easy for some. I already know I couldn't do it. I would get fed up with the whining and dictating and slow news days inside of a month, let alone the long years that Charles has been doing it.

Amen, Salem. Amen. And if I could add my own bit of funk to that: If this were my blog, I would wield the ban stick like a one-eyed, drunken monkey hopped up on crack. Charles is infinitely more patient and forgiving in this than many of us would ever be (including the whiners).

237 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:32:26pm

re: #231 Russkilitlover

Yes and no.

I figured.
Cliches have some truth in them.

238 Purple Prose  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:34:55pm

re: #198 Sharmuta

But islamists are themselves creationists.

Exactly. My point is that we have nothing to fear from "domestic" literal creationists. They will never alone be able to counter the idea of evolution, which is grounded in science. What we have to fear is a force that can trump rational debate, Islamists. They have some trump cards.

First of all, Islamists play the PC/multiculti card to silence all opposition. Secondly, they have the financial backing to wage legal and all other forms of jihad to silence or destroy their opponents.

My point in this whole "exchange" has been that domestic creationists/IDers are not much of a threat to our society and the science that is a product of Western civilization.

The concept of evolution has survived far worse internal assaults than we see with ID. The overwhelming number of school boards reject ID rightly as being worthy of being called science. In the very small number of cases where this has recently gone to the courts, ID has died the same fate as old-fashioned creationism.

(As an aside, no, there is no fundamental incompatibility with the concept of evolution and the concept that God created the universe - there is simply a fact-based incompatibility between a literal interpretation of the Bible that the world is 5-6K years old and science.)

So, my point is that the biggest threat to our way of life is not some domestic creationists/IDers challenging the teaching of evolution but Islamism. Islamism will change our educational system and way of life, if we let it, while other threats will prove insignificant.

239 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:35:28pm

re: #235 realwest

Well some of us have life-threatening illnesses and don't work and find it difficult to "get out and play"; others, I suspect, have very, ah forgiving, employers.

I only have 54,000 to go to catch up my friend

240 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:35:29pm

re: #192 maddogg

The sad thing is that scientists supported Global Warming without evidence in the first place. It means they are subject to influence by their prejudices, just like any person walking down the street, and they did not learn the first rule of the scientific method.

Yes, but bad science is still science nonetheless, and it is being supplanted by better science as we speak. However, there is NO science in ID; it is, and has been from its Disco Institute inception, a rhetorically camouflaged religious dogma poorly masquerading as science. Just a failed and futile PR propaganda ploy to circumvent court decisions against the teaching of creationism in public school science class, and now with such a court ruling against it under its new name.

241 Kulhwch  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:36:47pm

re: #46 cslepage

I think the Bush administration has been too successful against terrorism. I used to be able to count on coming here and reading story after story about terrorists, radical muslims, etc. Now I come here and almost always find a story about "creationism." Oh well.

Like most things, this won't be solved by running for office. You don't like what is being taught in public schools? Then either teach your children to think for themselves and to understand the variety of opinions you will find in realms such as science, or put them in a private school.

<blink>

TOO successful against terrorism?

Not solved by running for office?

I think you're using too much wrist.  You'll get more bites if you put the fly above an eddy or a small fall and let it wash down towards you before you pull back and cast again.

Registered since: Feb 2, 2005 at 3:38 pm

No. of comments posted: 24

... explains a lot.

}:)     [Mind your knuckles on the floor, I just mopped.]

242 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:37:54pm

re: #186 Killian Bundy
Hey Killian, I just KNEW I shoulda let you answer that one!

243 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:38:36pm

re: #205 realwest

Sorry, I know you asked that of Killian, but I'd like to sorta jump in hear: " ID fits very well with Taliban type excitement."
Do you really believe that?

I think the Discovery Institute and the Intelligent design process are corrupt efforts in our political and educational systems. For me they have a medieval base in the Dark Ages. I consider the Taliban though more violent and intolerant then American thinkers but to be coming out of the same type of Dark Ages. The fact that the Discovery Institute are routinely insincere and Intelligent Design has been used to attempt to force young earth creationism on the public school system. Then yes I can equate them in mindset and desires. They want to place a Dark Ages philosophy into the minds of school children. A big sin in my book. Maybe not yours.

If (sigh!) you are one of those many people who like I believe that the universe was intelligently created and God's hand is everywhere to be found over billions of years, but you still cling to the Discovery Institute and it's concept of ID then we are on different roads. I am a creationist in the strict abstract sense. The ID term here is being misused and propagated dishonestly by the Discovery Institute. If you are a young earther in the creationist sense. I apologize. It is just a religious difference of which I am usually very tolerant. I am not that and when i see an organized group trying to inject themselves in front of the line in the school systems to favor ID. My gut reaction is to laugh at them. I'll try and stop it. It's very poor manners.

244 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:39:28pm

re: #217 drmark

It seems you promote Evolution... So what title would you prefer? Rather than Evolutionist.... My apologies.

Howzabout empirical science supporter?

245 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:39:34pm

re: #234 Moe Katz

A small minority of about one-half?

To be honest I question that poll. I would like to see where and what demographics they polled.

246 Purple Prose  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:41:01pm

re: #207 cslepage

So I'm not so much half chimpanzee as much as I am 100% ape?

I'm glad we cleared that up.

Yes, we are 5 million years removed from chimps and bonobos (pygmy chimps), but we are 10-11 million years removed from gorillas and 12-16 million years removed from orangutans. Bottom line is we are more related to chimps than chimps are related to orangutans on the DNA level. We are all apes. We are just apes that changed a lot in our eyes (especially, in terms of our brains and our mastery of the environment). But in their own ways, chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans have all changed a lot from our common ancestor 16 million years ago.

247 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:41:19pm

re: #239 drmark Well ya know it's not a contest or anything! No prizes, not even a gold star like in 3rd grade.
I'd really not have the time to post so much, believe me.

248 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:41:33pm

re: #232 drmark

Your Avatar looks like my Black Lab

His name's Watson and he's my pal. Ain't Labs the best? He's a mix (supposedly an Australian Shepherd was his mom). But he's the most awesome dog, so intuitive - almost as much as my first dog, who was a Border Collie. Almost.

249 Salem  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:41:45pm

re: #189 Purple Prose

Clue: Anyone can start a blog. Do it! You can even promote it in the spinoff links and lure posters who want to focus on the threat of Islamism. Good luck.

250 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:42:09pm

re: #244 Salamantis

Howzabout empirical science supporter?

I figured that out myself that you really care about defending science...

My Scientist friend

251 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:42:54pm

re: #247 realwest


I'd really not have the time to post so much, believe me.

Quality beats out quantity, every time.

252 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:42:58pm

re: #240 Salamantis

Yes, but bad science is still science nonetheless, and it is being supplanted by better science as we speak. However, there is NO science in ID; it is, and has been from its Disco Institute inception,


Sorry, the design argument goes back at least to Aristotle, who was both a philosopher and a scientist

253 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:43:22pm

re: #221 hazzyday

Ahh finally you wish to write something I can reply to.

Well then, You might try actually answering the question I asked, name one public school district in the United States where ID/Creationism is currently taught as part of an approved science curriculum?

Personally, like the vast majority of LGF Christians (vast majority of Christians period), I believe in Creation and evolution. Charles himself has, on multiple occasions, stated that these beliefs aren't mutually exclusive as he sees it. And no, I and most Christians (LGFor otherwise) don't believe that the Earth is 6000 years old or that Man walked with dinosaurs.

/furthermore those LGF commenters on these threads who, directly or indirectly, smugly lump all Christians together and portray them as raving lunatics are, IMO, arrogant, ignorant assholes

254 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:43:33pm

re: #247 realwest

Well ya know it's not a contest or anything! No prizes, not even a gold star like in 3rd grade.
I'd really not have the time to post so much, believe me.

But at least we're proud Lizards...

255 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:44:02pm

re: #237 drmark

I figured.
Cliches have some truth in them.

I'm curious. Really (it's my nature). What do you mean?

256 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:44:40pm

Well as usual it's been grand tonight all y'all but I gotta get some sleep NOW! LOL!
I hope you all have a GREAT EVENING/EARLY MORNING and that I get the chance to see you down the road.


Goodnight, all.

257 realwest  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:46:47pm

re: #253 Killian Bundy
Ah Killian, I just had to come back and compliment you on a great post! Thanks.

Now goodnight, all!

258 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:47:40pm

Night realwest, have yourself a good nights sleep. Weet dreams.

259 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:47:53pm

re: #245 BlueCanuck

To be honest I question that poll. I would like to see where and what demographics they polled.

Even if that poll reports double the true value it belies the claim that creationists are a "small and fanatical minority," as someone claimed.

260 Pvt Bin Jammin  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:48:45pm

re: #257 realwest

'weet dreams, Realwest. See you tomorrow.

261 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:51:32pm

re: #224 realwest

"methinks you take offence when none is intended, if you truly are how you self-represent..."
Now I have to hand it to you, that's probably the coolest way to suggest someone is a liar I've ever heard. Regretfully for you, I am not a liar.
Perhaps you ought to go back and read what you said - try to do it objectively, hard though that may be for any of us to do with our own writings - and see if no offense was intended with what you wrote.

Here's what I originally wrote, in post #73:

"And Islamocreationism and the domestic Christian variety have recently become bedfellows."

Now the domestic Christian variety of islamocreationists must be...umm...err...ahh...lessee...I've got it; US Christian creationists who are pushing a creationist political agenda here, trying to force religious dogma to be taught as science in public schools, as Harun Yahya is doing wherever they are! Like those dewdes at the Disco Institute and the Institute for Creation Research who indeed have connections with Harun Yahya - connections that have been posted about by Charles on this very blog - are doing.

If you are not one of those disgusting snakes, I was not referring to you, nor was I intending to offend. If, OTOH, you ARE one of those folks who embraces the agenda of Harun Yahya, the Disco Dewdes and the ICR, I sincerely HOPE that you take offence, because offence was most certainly intended.

262 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:52:21pm

re: #259 Moe Katz

Even if that poll reports double the true value it belies the claim that creationists are a "small and fanatical minority," as someone claimed.

I am not saying that all creationists are "fanatical". Just some with axes to grind and try to force their beliefs on others. My mom is a die hard creationist. But she holds that belief to her self and her church. She doesn't go running around trying to change school curriculum's to suit her beliefs.

263 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:52:53pm

re: #253 Killian Bundy

Well then, You might try actually answering the question I asked, name one public school district in the United States where ID/Creationism is currently taught as part of an approved science curriculum?

Sticks and stone.. lol You have a way of making a good point. I did answer your question. I pointed to the losses in the trials on ID. If those trials mean nothing to you... ID was intended to go into approved science curriculum in all those instances. The fact that it didn't make it is just luck on our parts. And a good voter populace and judiciary.

It's more of a case me trying to answer your question and you not liking the answer aka hannity. That could be a compliment I guess. You result to name calling to empasize your points and your frustrations.

I asked you if you were a young earth creationist and didn't receive an answer. Are you the type of person who insultingly demands answers to their questions? And then when answered and queried back? refuses? what does that sound like to you?

I realize you just read too quickly and jumped to conclusions and started spouting off crap left and right. As a Christian I forgive you. And more importantly myself for getting you worked up.

264 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:53:04pm

re: #256 realwest

Sleep well. Get stronger.

"Tomorrow's another day." - Scarlett O'Hara. Not the best role model, but a pillar of strength and perseverance, nonetheless.

265 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:54:30pm

re: #86 Salamantis

Actually, the issue is already determined, by the application of the 1st Amendment, as was done in the Dover case with Creationism 2.0 (intelligent design). But true believers are nothing if not persistent, so the courts keep having to prohibit the teaching of Creationism 2.1, and 2.2, and 3.0, and so on, in public high school science classes.

Emphasis mine. This should be a telling indicator to all those capable of reason and intellectual honesty.

Failing to gain any verifiable credibility in any scientific field, the cdesign proponenists resort to the attempt of brain-wash impressionable children into believing in their brand of neo-Luddism by politicizing their position, cynically manipulating public opinion, and gaming the courts.

In this way, they are most certainly kith and kindred of the leftists, communists, socialists, collectivists, fascists, and nanny-statists that use those very same methods to insert their ideologies into public education for the purpose of promoting their political agenda.

By their fruits you shall know them.

266 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:54:46pm

re: #226 Moe Katz

re: #219 Salamantis

It's a wedge issue for a small and fanatical minority of those...

Very nice. And your evidence for this belief is?

The relative percentage of people who post on these threads in favor of the Disco Dewde agenda, compared with those who post in opposition to it. Also the number of people who plus evo threads vs the number who minus them.

Their fanaticism is sleeve-worn, btw...

267 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:55:34pm

re: #253 Killian Bundy

Well then, You might try actually answering the question I asked, name one public school district in the United States where ID/Creationism is currently taught as part of an approved science curriculum?

I have been constantly making the point in all my contributions in these thread on the great value of Christianity in the world history. And I like to point out that YEC'ism is creationism but that all creationism is not yec ism.

I'll bail on you here. I think you just needed a scapegoat for the night. Good luck to yah.

268 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:56:16pm

re: #255 Russkilitlover

I really just meant that if you seek God now you will find him and answers to the questions in life just as much as if you went back as you described..

Even more so today... everyone has access to Jesus through the holy spirit....


Try it you'll like it..

269 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:58:28pm

re: #266 Salamantis

The relative percentage of people who post on these threads in favor of the Disco Dewde agenda, compared with those who post in opposition to it. Also the number of people who plus evo threads vs the number who minus them.

Their fanaticism is sleeve-worn, btw...

I think there are religious creationist-type people that stay off these evolution threads but participate on other LGF threads they are more comfortable with and where they have a common cause with Charles.

270 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 10:59:51pm

re: #219 Salamantis

It's a wedge issue for a small and fanatical minority of those...

Fixed that for ya.

A small minority of about one-half?

[Link: www.cbsnews.com...]

Well, perhaps not one half of the general population, as it contains a lot of idiotarians of all stripes, but certainly a small minority on this site, where idiotarians self-cull out, if they ever join.

271 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:03:54pm

re: #270 Salamantis

This may be changing lately, but LGF discussion threads have traditionally penalized dissent to a point where only the most determined contrarian is willing to deal suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous flaming and defend a nonconforming viewpoint. So I wouldn't take the apparent consensus as indicating a hell of a lot.

272 Kulhwch  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:05:55pm
re: #97 Salamantis
re: #47 Russkilitlover

But it creates such a serendipitous situation to have us bickering amongst ourselves vis-a-via creationism, ID, evolution. We'll keep hammering each other and before we know it....Sharia! End of all discussions.

I don't think that joining hands with Christian anti-science religious irrationalists and singing Kum Ba Ya with them will protect us from Islamic anti-science religious irrationalists, or from religious irrationalism in general, any more than I think that joining hands with eurofascists and singing Kum Ba Ya with them will protect us from Islamofascists, or from fascism in general.

You're right, either way, it has a certain feeling to it.

I don't know about you, but I'd be breaking up deck chairs for a raft or something.

}:)     [One can be proactive in any arena the fascistii are in and fight them there, or one can sit on one's thumb and bemoan one's sorry fate.  I've never liked my thumb that much, personally.]

273 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:06:26pm

re: #263 hazzyday

I pointed to the losses in the trials on ID. If those trials mean nothing to you... ID was intended to go into approved science curriculum in all those instances. The fact that it didn't make it is just luck on our parts. And a good voter populace and judiciary.

So what's your problem, why are you so scared of ID? It hasn't gotten any traction in public schools and it never will. You know why? Because the Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have consistently ruled that teaching Creation as science is [expletive deleted] illegal and has been for many decades now. Luck has absolutely nothing to do with it.

I asked you if you were a young earth creationist and didn't receive an answer.

What part of . . .

And no, I and most Christians (LGFor otherwise) don't believe that the Earth is 6000 years old or that Man walked with dinosaurs

. . . was beyond your reading comprehension?

/by the way, the answer to the question I asked is, there are zero public school districts in the United States where ID/Creationism is currently taught as part of an approved science curriculum

274 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:06:51pm

re: #244 Salamantis

Howzabout empirical science supporter?

I figured that out myself that you really care about defending science...

My Scientist friend

I like the 'empirical' part, too, as I am partial to acknowledging empirical evidence and what it means, rather than embracing a priori dogmas from millennia ago, regardless of whether they are contradicted by observable facts (age of the universe, the world and terrestrial life, common ancestry)...

275 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:07:11pm

re: #271 Moe Katz

IOW, I don't think you can get around the fact that the teaching of evolution is a wedge issue that divides those in the conservative tent. And the 'idiotarians,' it seems to me, are on the left and generally pro-evolution.

276 Archimedes  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:07:26pm

Something that I think is important is the issue of Obama having been a muslim. This doesn't come up much any more, but the fact is he was one and he denies it. So, this should be hammered home.

The renowned Middle East scholar, Daniel Pipes, has done research showing him to have been a muslim:

[Link: www.danielpipes.org...]

277 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:08:27pm

re: #268 drmark

As you can probably surmise, I'm not the most academic of religiosity. However, since I was about 5 yrs old, I have visited the So. Cal Mission of San Juan Capistrano. I was raised Episcopal, not Catholic, but this place gives me peace. I spent 4 hrs. there yesterday. I get the same "spiritual" feeling in Santa Fe/Taos area of NM. Is that religion? I certainly don't listen to a preacher of any kind, espousing a specific interpretation, but I definitely feel more grounded, centered, after visiting each place. To me, spirituality is in an individual's heart. And it is for this reason that I oppose any creeping indoctrination of public school students. That is not the forum for such discovery.

278 redc1c4  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:09:47pm

in case someone didn't heart the standard questions, and they are needed down thread:

"What testable, falsifiable hypotheses does ID put forth? What testable, falsifiable theories have been presented by the DI? On what grounds can the DI claim that ID is a scientific theory?"

and now to bed, so i can take the FiL to eye surgery in the AM....

enjoy the fruitcup!

/white smoke

279 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:10:03pm

re: #107 pat

Am I the only one in America that thinks Paris Hilton's ad proves she is a dimwit? The fact that she is smarter than Obama is not a surprise, but the thought this fool thinks her condescending view of white haired men (dad?) amounts to an argument is mind boggling.

You're probably reading more into it than you should. Just give it a grunt or a chuckle, and then move on. It's nothing more that a bit of satirical fluff. After all, she's not really running for POSTUS.

And if American Idol fanatics are any indication of public voting, we should be grateful she's not.

/ouch!

280 BlueCanuck  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:10:59pm

re: #278 redc1c4

Night red. I hope the FiL's surgery goes okay. Going to miss you tonight.

281 Pvt Bin Jammin  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:15:32pm

re: #278 redc1c4

Nite, Red. Best of luck to your father in law.
Nite, Blue, & lizards.

282 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:15:33pm

re: #111 cslepage

I don't accept evolution as evidence of "sane science" anymore than I do global warming.

*sigh*

283 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:16:12pm

re: #273 Killian Bundy

Get a grip on yourself. lol You're making me thread hang.

Your comment passed me in the posting. Tell me you are against the Discovery Institutes Intelligent Design and I will then believe you aren't a yec'r. It's fine if you are a yec'r though. There is lots of company. I just have to note it not to insult you.

ID is just a bad idea. I gathered that from reading the content here on this blog. It's a weed you have to dig out again and again. Doesn't belong in the garden of Eden.

You're locked in on zero school districts as proof of something? I think that hasn't been the primary concern here in any of these threads. You're pedaling for a platform where you can rationalize to yourself that ID by the Discovery Institute and thus young earth creatitionism is ok becuase it's in zero school books? It's fine for people to think what they want. It's not fine having to waste taxpayer dollars kicking ID out of the school systems every year. WEED.....

284 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:17:01pm

re: #252 Moe Katz

re: #240 Salamantis

Yes, but bad science is still science nonetheless, and it is being supplanted by better science as we speak. However, there is NO science in ID; it is, and has been from its Disco Institute inception,

Sorry, the design argument goes back at least to Aristotle, who was both a philosopher and a scientist

The argument from design does go back far beyond when we could really consider science to exist in all but name; back millennia before such things as the verification principle, falsification, and the scientific method had come to be. Aristotle was not a scientist under contemporary standards.

And the argument from design has been discredited ever since Thomas Henry Huxlet destroyed Bishop Samuel Wilberforce when he attempted to defend it in an Oxford College debate in 1860. The intervening years have only caused it further grief, as scientific advances have proven to be even more catastrophic to the stance.

As George H. Smith noted:

Consider the idea that nature itself is the product of design. How could this be demonstrated? Nature, as we have seen, provides the basis of comparison by which we distinguish between designed objects and natural objects. We are able to infer the presence of design only to the extent that the characteristics of an object differ from natural characteristics. Therefore, to claim that nature as a whole was designed is to destroy the basis by which we differentiate between artifacts and natural objects. Evidences of design are those characteristics not found in nature, so it is impossible to produce evidence of design within the context of nature itself. Only if we first step beyond nature, and establish the existence of a supernatural designer, can we conclude that nature is the result of conscious planning.

Sal: In other words, one cannot work upwards from apprehended design in the natural world to the concept of a cosmic designer; one can only work down from the a priori premise of the existence and efficacy of such a designer to the interpretation of the structural regularities one observes in nature as haveing been designed.

This is the logically backwards exact opposite of science, as it fallaciously assumes as a premise what it falsely purports to prove as a conclusion.

285 Kulhwch  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:18:00pm
re: #132 Racer X
re: #122 Palandine

I agree with Salem above--the reason I never started a blog is because I am incapable of providing the free ice cream multiple times a day.

WTH!

You guys are getting ice cream? Where's the line for that? I want some.

<pointing> On the other side of the line for the bbq gamey buttocks.

}:)     [Make sure you have your Zionist ID ready, though.]

286 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:21:07pm

re: #276 Archimedes

Amazon: The Faith of Obama

This book was on Medved today. Unlike the notes on my local TV station the author does posit that he did indeed attend school where he studied the Koran, but later was lost and found Christ.

/A creationist but not a yec'r

287 Salem  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:21:52pm

re: #273 Killian Bundy

So what's your problem, why are you so scared of ID? It hasn't gotten any traction in public schools and it never will. You know why? Because the Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have consistently ruled that teaching Creation as science is [expletive deleted] illegal and has been for many decades now. Luck has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Good. Then there isn't a problem. Right?

288 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:24:16pm

re: #269 Moe Katz

re: #266 Salamantis

The relative percentage of people who post on these threads in favor of the Disco Dewde agenda, compared with those who post in opposition to it. Also the number of people who plus evo threads vs the number who minus them.

Their fanaticism is sleeve-worn, btw...

Moe: I think there are religious creationist-type people that stay off these evolution threads but participate on other LGF threads they are more comfortable with and where they have a common cause with Charles.

Sal: Well, then they aren't the Disco Dewde type who want to foist creationism off into public school science classes, then, are they? Or perhaps they are, but are just a bit timid about trumpeting the fact here.

289 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:28:57pm

re: #122 Palandine

Oh, Charles HATES Christians and Jews who believe in the
Bible. That's why he's so supportive of Israel, and why he's spent the past SEVEN YEARS pointing out the Islamofascist threat, multiple times, every day, for free.

Emphasis mine, but it bears repeating that we all enjoy this site FREE OF CHARGE!

Now, who can tell me what brand of folk consistently whine and complain about the free-bees they receive? Maybe I've been in my vault too long, but the last time I checked it wasn't hard working, freedom loving individualists who whined about "free stuff".

290 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:31:03pm

re: #277 Russkilitlover

Those spiritual experiences you describe are the best....

They are like art, pictures, music.... my personal favorites too..

The Ocean works well too....

If you want to get some where spiritually boring things like a map and a compass are handy....

291 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:31:44pm

re: #283 hazzyday

Tell me you are against the Discovery Institutes Intelligent Design and I will then believe you aren't a yec'r. It's fine if you are a yec'r though. There is lots of company. I just have to note it not to insult you.

Does it strike you that I'm a fan of ID or YEC? [Expletive deleted] off.

You're pedaling for a platform where you can rationalize to yourself that ID by the Discovery Institute and thus young earth creatitionism is ok becuase it's in zero school books?

Am I? I did not know that. Project much?

It's not fine having to waste taxpayer dollars kicking ID out of the school systems every year.

So, what are you going to do about it, deny them the right to free speech, round them all up and deport them?

/by the way, those organizations doing the "kicking out", like the ACLU and Americans United aren't taxpayer funded

292 Kulhwch  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:32:21pm
re: #146 drmark
re: #135 Salamantis

The most immediate threat is that the selfsame Christian creationists who are behind the scenes getting laws like the one in Louisiana passed are the very ones who are networking with Islamocreationists in the Middle East. Wake up and smell the Turkish tobacco and the chicory coffee!

How about the threat of evolutionists like yourself in bed with PC leftism that is Really in bed with Islamist terrorists'?

I think we've hit our official first knee-jerk of the evening.

}:)     [Dang, I forgot to get in the poll!]

293 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:33:25pm

re: #275 Moe Katz

IOW, I don't think you can get around the fact that the teaching of evolution is a wedge issue that divides those in the conservative tent. And the 'idiotarians,' it seems to me, are on the left and generally pro-evolution.

My, haven't YOU come a long way from post # 159:

Hi Charles,

I'm afraid the big tent you were able to maintain for your WOT focus is going to get a bit smaller with your new emphasis on the evolution issue. It's a wedge issue for those that have hitherto backed you; I imagine even some of the more orthodox Jews will be uncomfortable. Not that I think you should try to please all of the people all of the time.... and as a secular Zionist and scientist I happen to be on your side on this one.

Soooo...you yourself are one of those people whom you are now labeling as idiotarians? Not that you are leftist, but that you indicate that you are on Charles' side on this issue, which would appear to me to be pro-evolutionary theory, or at least in favor of having the science of evolutionary theory taught in public high school science classes, and not the religious dogma of ID, which is creationism relabeled for public consumption. But you just associated those who are 'pro-evolution' with idiotarians.

Hint: Idiotarians can be on any location on the political spectrum. All they have to do to deserve the label is to embrace the idiotic - like people who think that science should be a popularity contest.

294 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:33:58pm

re: #291 Killian Bundy

Judges cost money.

Yec'r or not? You seem to say you aren't then you say you are. Be honest. Don't be like the Discovery Institute.

295 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:35:59pm

re: #287 Salem

Good. Then there isn't a problem. Right?

/no more than with any other unsuccessful fringe group with an unrequited desire to impose their will on the majority of society

296 Kulhwch  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:36:03pm
re: #153 Sharmuta
re: #146 drmark

Reason and Freedom have many enemies. We should stand opposed to any and all of them, for I think both Reason and Freedom are intricately tied together. How can Freedom survive without Reason?

Luck.  Pure dumb luck.  We've been fortunate and don't realize it.

}:)     [Let's hope we get a chance to celebrate it someday.]

297 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:36:43pm

re: #290 drmark


The Ocean works well too....

I

The ocean goes without saying! Nothing can make you feel smaller and larger than the ocean's horizon, or the surge of a tide. It was surprising to me that I also felt something "otherworldly" in such land-locked places as Santa Fe, NM. I can't articulate it, the Navajos certainly have it right, but it's like stepping into another dimension. Crazy? If so...viva Crazy!

298 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:38:43pm

re: #294 hazzyday

Judges cost money.

And? The get paid no matter what case they preside over.

/would they get time off if the ID folks stopped getting sued?

299 Kulhwch  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:41:55pm

re: #173 ggt

What's with the posters who have been around a long time and posted little? Is there a full moon?

Ah, yes, the lizard undead.

}:)     [Funny how they only seem to appear in threads some think are insults to a certain faith based around resurrection.]

300 Russkilitlover  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:42:44pm

Good nite, all. Got to get up early tomorrow and continue the job search. It is certainly full time!

I hope that Charles keeps up with these posts - if nothing else, they enable our own self discovery.

301 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:43:24pm

re: #253 Killian Bundy

Personally, like the vast majority of LGF Christians (vast majority of Christians period), I believe in Creation and evolution. Charles himself has, on multiple occasions, stated that these beliefs aren't mutually exclusive as he sees it. And no, I and most Christians (LGFor otherwise) don't believe that the Earth is 6000 years old or that Man walked with dinosaurs.

Killian #291 Does it strike you that I'm a fan of ID or YEC? [Expletive deleted] off.


yes it seems like you are working towards ID and Yec'ism based on what you want to say. But in 253 you say you aren't.

Again, I am not sure why you are so hostile expect that I am critizing and laughing at yec'rs and comparing them to the Taliban. If you want to be a yec'r be a yec'r. I think it has to do with some non thread stuff. Go get a beer and go to bed. Sleep it off.

Yes it is poor manners to laugh at yec'rs. I realize that. I will try and do better. It's probably better then your talibanish seething that you are going through. All in all, I think that last part really proves my point.

302 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:44:13pm

re: #294 hazzyday

Yec'r or not? You seem to say you aren't then you say you are.

/are you on drugs?

303 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:45:03pm

re: #127 The Other Les

Moonbat of the Day:

Woman in Northern California has never seen a rainbow caused by a lawn sprinkler, blames evil conspiracy.

My (lack of) God! What a moron!

"What the heck is in our water supply, what the heck is in our oxygen supply....that creates a rainbow effect in a sprinkler".

Um, last time I checked, it was hydrogen and oxygen, and combinations thereof.

Double points to her for pretty much insinuating that gov't public works are responsible for providing us with air. Some people will believe anything.

/the sprinkler refracts light, yet the moonbat waters on

304 Kulhwch  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:46:12pm
re: #180 cslepage
re: #168 ggt

I hear if you are ever in the area, Charles has a pretty nifty creamery and microbrewery in Sub-basement, er, well, you know.

Does he make chocolate chip mint ice cream? That way, I could be clueless, irrational, and well fed at the same time.

So you're hungry right now?

}:)     [There are gamey buttocks a'plenty, just look for the bbq pits.]

305 Killian Bundy  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:46:17pm

re: #301 hazzyday

it seems like you are working towards ID and Yec'ism based on what you want to say.

Ooh, this ought to be good.

/please tell me, what do I want to say?

306 drmark  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:47:11pm

re: #300 Russkilitlover

New Mexico it's that magical sky...
Good night

307 wolfie  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:50:12pm

re: #301 hazzyday

Iron Fist rule?

308 Moe Katz  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:51:09pm

re: #293 Salamantis


"But you just associated those who are 'pro-evolution' with idiotarians."

The idiotarians, most of whom are indeed left-liberals or socialists, are generally pro-evolution. It doesn't follow from this, however, that everyone who is pro-evolution is a left-wing idiotarian. All A's belong to B, but not all B's belong to A. A classic logical fallacy

And on that note I bid you goodnight.

309 Archimedes  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:51:45pm

re: #284 Salamantis

re: #240 Salamantis

Sorry, the design argument goes back at least to Aristotle, who was both a philosopher and a scientist

I'm wondering about that, because Aristotle didn't believe in a god. He believed there was a "prime mover" that got the universe going, but he had no idea of a god in the Christian sense.

Actually, he started out a Platonist, and turned Platonism inside out, and derived his own observation based philosophy.


The argument from design does go back far beyond when we could really consider science to exist in all but name; back millennia before such things as the verification principle, falsification, and the scientific method had come to be. Aristotle was not a scientist under contemporary standards.

He was the father of science, in that he came up with the method. He very much believed that the evidence is the ultimate determiner of truth, and he's the one who came up with the idea of "hypothesizing" logically (he's also the father of logic) to come up with a principle understanding of the stuff being studied. You hypothesize, check the hypothesis against the evidence, look for contradictions, and then re-hypothesize. You continue in like manner. What he didn't have were things like the experimental method and the idea of precise measurement.

310 Slumbering Behemoth  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:52:49pm

re: #129 Sharmuta

I'll buy that for a dollar.

311 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:55:42pm

re: #305 Killian Bundy

Ooh, this ought to be good.

/please tell me, what do I want to say?

What is the whole point of your replies with the invective and the hostility? You couldn't start out by making a point about anything. Just spewing some invective. What's your point? I have started to think you just want to bitch and bully.

My points are all that Discovery Institute, Intelligent Design, and yec'ism are evil and bad and dishonest and do not play well with others. The Discovery Institute kind of pollutes the other two. Where do you disagree with me? Be honest, so I can understand. Else you are just looking to get a rise out of people.

You think ID as proposed by the DI is good? But you believe in evolution? Maybe I should ask how you believe in evolution?

I'm fine if you believe in any of those. But as I said I am going to laugh at it ID folks when they go to court, even though it a serious business.

312 hazzyday  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:56:22pm

re: #307 wolfie

Iron Fist rule?

You are smarter than I am lol

313 Salamantis  Wed, Aug 6, 2008 11:56:26pm

re: #298 Killian Bundy

re: #294 hazzyday

Judges cost money.

And? The get paid no matter what case they preside over.

/would they get time off if the ID folks stopped getting sued?

Sal: No, but school districts would stop losing the money they lose when they lose such cases. The Dico Dewdes instigate such events, but don't lose jack shit on them. They get to make money selling their creationist instruction school curriculum crap, but when the school district loses the court case, only the school district bears the financial burden; them and, of course, the students and teachers, who have to do as much as they can with far less. The Duisco Dewdes get to walk away from the carnage with wallets intact, and even a bit fatter from sales made by such creationist curriculum publishers as A Beka Books.

314 Sharmuta  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:00:25am

re: #310 Slumbering Behemoth

Aww- I'm only worth a dollar?

316 wolfie  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:04:42am

re: #312 hazzyday

You are smarter than I am lol

Actually, I was talking about YOU !
Sorry. :(
I just think KB has been crystal clear and you've been all over the place running around in circles tonight.

317 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:05:01am

re: #311 hazzyday

You think ID as proposed by the DI is good?

Where did I ever say that or anything that could even be remotely construed as that?

My points are all that Discovery Institute, Intelligent Design, and yec'ism are evil and bad

Right, the Taliban, I got that part.

/probably marching around under your bed right now, serious business

318 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:07:57am

re: #308 Moe Katz

"But you just associated those who are 'pro-evolution' with idiotarians."

The idiotarians, most of whom are indeed left-liberals or socialists, are generally pro-evolution. It doesn't follow from this, however, that everyone who is pro-evolution is a left-wing idiotarian. All A's belong to B, but not all B's belong to A. A classic logical fallacy

And on that note I bid you goodnight.

People who are pro-evolution, regardless of their place on the political spectrum, may indeed be idiotarians, but they are not idiotarians on the issue of acknowledging the soundness, solidness and validity of good empirical science. They would have to be idiotarians on other things. OTOH, those who are attempting to force the teaching of religious dogmas in public high school science class are either idiotarians themselves or are the malevolent people who are manipulating them for their own nefarious ends.

I agree that a larger percentage of the Left accepts evolutionary theory as sound and valid science than does the percentage of the Right that so accepts it. I furthermore state that this is a case where the Left has gotten it far more right than has the Right. This is an area upon which the Right needs to put in some serious self-rectifying work, because on the issue of evolutionary theory, more of the anti-idiotarians are on the more liberal side of the spectrum. As I said before, people may be either idiotarians or anti-idiotarians, regardless of their position on the political spectrum, and people who are anti-idiotarian on one issue may be idiotarian on another.

319 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:09:53am

re: #313 Salamantis

school districts would stop losing the money they lose when they lose such cases.

/probably worth paying more attention to the local school boards then

320 hazzyday  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:14:42am

re: #316 wolfie

Actually, I was talking about YOU !
Sorry. :(
I just think KB has been crystal clear and you've been all over the place running around in circles tonight.

Lol I have no idea why he has a burr under his saddle. He can't explain it to me. I have been trying to figure out what his point is. What is his point if he is crystal clear and you understand it.

He comes off to me as rude and insulting and that he likes it that way and that is more important to him than anything else. Thus I agreed with you that he was drunk. Maybe your idea is GMTA?

My points are the same. He has none.

Discovery Institute -- dishonest
Intellligent design -- bad idea
Yec'rs -- love em but have to laugh at em.
ID = Taliban I made my dark ages point about it. I think it's valid. His reply was about schools with no ID textbooks. I think that is a weak reply.

/Hazzyday -- Creationist not a yec'r

321 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:15:48am

re: #314 Sharmuta

Aww- I'm only worth a dollar?

Now way sweetie, much more. But I too am worth more than a dollar.

I am certain if we were to sit down and negotiate a deal, we could come to a mutually acceptable agreement that would negate the exchange of material goods.

/Camels and beers being optional. ;)

322 hazzyday  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:16:10am

re: #317 Killian Bundy

Right, the Taliban, I got that part.

/probably marching around under your bed right now, serious business

You don't say anything. Such a sour personality.

323 hazzyday  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:17:21am

re: #319 Killian Bundy

Tell me where you disagree with me. Be crystal clear.

324 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:23:00am

re: #8 solomonpanting

“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,” said Alan Detrich

That description escapes me, but I'd bet Mr. Detrich is half-idiot, half-wit.

The term that comes to mind is quarter-wit, those that too stupid to rank as half-wits.

325 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:24:16am

re: #323 hazzyday

Tell me where you disagree with me. Be crystal clear.

People who believe in ID aren't comparable to the Taliban, period. Clear enough?

/because nothing says Taliban like a persistently impotent inability to impose your beliefs on the majority, no matter how hard you try

326 wolfie  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:25:28am

re: #320 hazzyday

Re the Iron Fist Rule, I said: "Actually, I was talking about YOU!"
How do you get from that to an assertion that I was talking about KB?
How do you get to "thus I agreed with you that he was drunk" when I just said I thought maybe YOU were?

I don't think you're reading too well tonight!

Or it could be a full moon.

327 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:25:35am

Besides that, how could Mohammed be 50% chimpanzee, if he is 90% (self-censored)?

328 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:26:29am

re: #319 Killian Bundy

re: #313 Salamantis

school districts would stop losing the money they lose when they lose such cases.

/probably worth paying more attention to the local school boards then

The Disco Dewdes sure do. They get Biblical literalist churches to field creationist candidates to all kinds of public offices, and to organize and vote for them; they then get these folks to sponsor and/or vote for Disco Dewde creationism admittance into public high school science classes on any level they can manage.

329 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:27:19am

re: #324 Alberta Oil Peon

The term that comes to mind is quarter-wit, those that too stupid to rank as half-wits.

Perhaps their wit is so dim because only half of it is showing...

330 Sharmuta  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:27:38am

re: #321 Slumbering Behemoth

Well- could you meet me in the Lizard Lounge right now?

331 BlueCanuck  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:28:09am

re: #329 Salamantis

Perhaps their wit is so dim because only half of it is showing...

That whole hiding their lights under a bushel thing?

/They're doing it wrong.

332 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:28:54am

re: #31 ggt

THAT is one majorly kewl photo!

Ain't that the truth! I'd love to go there and witness that happening.

333 wolfie  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:31:05am

re: #328 Salamantis

Is there some significance attached to your spelling "dude" as "dewde," or is it just to be cewte?
Just wondering. :)

334 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:31:07am

He knows better whose knowledge is deduced from higher causes, for his knowledge is from prior premisses when it derives from causes themselves uncaused.

Where demonstration is possible, one who can give no account which includes the cause has no scientific knowledge.

-Aristotle

335 chrisbg99  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:32:48am

Where do these people get the impression that evolution scientists claim that humans evolved from chimpanzees?

The only people I know who do that are creationists who are trying very hard to discredit evolution but can't so they try throwing something against a wall and seeing what sticks and people who claim to favor evolution but having barely any idea what it entails.

336 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:34:09am

re: #40 Purple Prose

I love all of these anti-irrationalist threads. It is part and parcel with opposition to Islamist absolutism. The rationalism we inherited from the Renaissance and the Enlightenment are the foundation of the modern West and our best defense against all medieval forces that wish to throw us back into an age of darkness. Yet, all the same, I wish there were more posts directly pertaining to the most clear and immediate medieval threat that faces us: Islamism.

Evolution as a scientific discipline and the teaching of this science is not nearly as threatened by irrationalists as Western civilization (including Christianity and scientific thought) as a whole is by a specific breed of irrationalist: Islamism.

CAIR and all the other related organizations are still on the march, working day and night to undermine the foundations of democratic liberal (in the classical sense) society. Their financial and ideological supporters abroad are also working, day and night, to extend sharia, acutely aware of the soft spots of open Western societies.

That is the most immediate and imminent and dangerous threat we all face, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, secular humanist or atheist.

Good point, PP. But I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps the sudden upsurge in activity on the part of the Discovery Institute and their followers is not being financed by the same Wahabbiist Islam that is financing the Harun Yahya outfit in Turkey. It's all about sowing discord amongst one's enemies.

And they probably don't even have a clue that they are being used as pawns.

337 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:34:52am

re: #328 Salamantis

The Disco Dewdes sure do. They get Biblical literalist churches to field creationist candidates to all kinds of public offices, and to organize and vote for them; they then get these folks to sponsor and/or vote for Disco Dewde creationism admittance into public high school science classes on any level they can manage.

It's a free country, you can't throttle the ID fringe's right to free speech any more than you can that of white supremacists.

Try as they might, ID is going nowhere and is hardly a clear and present danger to secular science education in the United States.

/the law concerning teaching creation as science in public schools is well settled and has been for decades

338 hazzyday  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:36:36am

re: #325 Killian Bundy

People who believe in ID aren't comparable to the Taliban, period. Clear enough?

/because nothing says Taliban like a persistently impotent inability to impose your beliefs on the majority, no matter how hard you try

No, because it took you all night to get to that point. I'll ask for more clarification. Your end quote describes both Taliban and DI to me.

I understand ID as a process that opposes billions of years of evolution. You stated you believed in evolution and not in the young earth ideas.

I don't believe in that type of ID and do believe it has the same narrow mindedness as the Taliban. I could have probably picked a better example, but I don't mind discussing it. Or what false systems of thought to compare ID to? I was leaning to troofers.

I do believe the universe was intelligently designed, but in the context of a long period of time. I was trying to see if you were one of those people that conflate the two types of ID. I have kind of asked you directly and you don't want to say. I guess that is your business. :=-)

339 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:39:39am

ALL CHRISTIANS WEAR LEISURE SUITS AND SILVER COKE SPOONS!

...and...

THEY LIKE TO BOOGIE-WOOGIE ALL NIGHT LONG!

JUST LIKE THE TALIBAN!

340 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:40:10am

re: #335 chrisbg99

Coming from a Creationist, I think you have a good point Chrisbg99. There are some major Creationists who agree with you: Dr. Kurt Wise is a palentologist that did his doctoral work under Stephen J Gould, and is a young earth creationist, believes in the whole seven day creation story, the works. He says essentially the same thing. The work that he is doing is pretty amazing. Last I heard he was assembling a team of linguists, chemists, physicists...etc.. to put together a model. I had a copy of his draft model, but he told me when he gave it to me that it was already outdated. It was constantly being updated and changed, i.e. evolving.

341 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:43:54am

re: #60 Throbert McGee

The mention of purgatory intrigues me (well, maybe "intrigues" is too strong a word).

I thought that Purgatory was a concept found only in Roman Catholic theology -- but the Vatican frowns on the kind of Genesis literalism this guy is espousing. (One of his web pages refers to marine fossils deposited by "The Great Flood.") Of course, it's certainly possible that a lay Catholic could choose, as an individual, believe in Young Earth Creationism, even though the Church discourages such belief.

And there's no question that some American Protestant denominations are strongly anti-Purgatory -- they regard it as a theological corruption that gives the false hope of avoiding Hell for people who die "unsaved."

And exactly why would a "great flood" lead to a vast quantity of marine fossils? One would think if the world's oceans vastly increased their extent, that marine creatures would flourish, noshing down on the rotting corpses of the unfortunate land animals.

In actual fact, the majority of marine fossils (which are pretty gosh-darn plentiful) represent periods of uniformity in the marine environment, when conditions were such that the inorganic remains of the dear departed could peacefully settle to the sea floor and become part of the sediment. In the marine environment, fossils are the norm; in terrestrial environments, fossils are the exception. This fact tends to escape the YEC types.

342 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:45:35am

re: #337 Killian Bundy

It's a free country, you can't throttle the ID fringe's right to free speech any more than you can that of white supremacists.

Try as they might, ID is going nowhere and is hardly a clear and present danger to secular science education in the United States.

/the law concerning teaching creation as science in public schools is well settled and has been for decades

Okay, I get that...

But the chaos that has ensued from daring to counter the DI here has been very telling, Killian, and the cat is already out of the bag.

343 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:46:27am

re: #338 hazzyday

Your end quote describes both Taliban and DI to me.

The Taliban controls NW Pakistan and a sizable chunk of Afghanistan. They have weapons, fight like hell, burn down girl's schools, and force the U.S. to commit a significant military force just to keep them from overrunning Kandahar and Kabul.

The DI and ID adherents control, well, nothing, zip, nada, not even one measly school district science curriculum.

/one is not remotely like the other, it's an absurd comparison, get it?

344 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:47:05am

re: #183 Sharmuta

Absolutely! I really don't understand why the comments section for spinoff threads isn't utilized more by people not interested in this topic.

Because some would rather bitch and whine than contribute in a significant way? Just a guess.

345 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:49:40am

re: #333 wolfie

Is there some significance attached to your spelling "dude" as "dewde," or is it just to be cewte?
Just wondering. :)

Just the same reason some people spell "cool" as "kewl"...;~)

Kinda hip, kinda sarc...

346 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:49:47am

re: #330 Sharmuta

Shit! Did I miss an opportunity here? Damn my slow reading!

:checks the lounge:

347 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:50:44am

re: #334 jeremy1013

He knows better whose knowledge is deduced from higher causes, for his knowledge is from prior premisses when it derives from causes themselves uncaused.

Where demonstration is possible, one who can give no account which includes the cause has no scientific knowledge.

-Aristotle

Remember that he also thought that everything was made of air, earth, fire and water...

348 hazzyday  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:51:00am

re: #343 Killian Bundy

The Taliban controls NW Pakistan and a sizable chunk of Afghanistan. They have weapons, fight like hell, burn down girl's schools, and force the U.S. to commit a significant military force just to keep them from overrunning Kandahar and Kabul.

The DI and ID adherents control, well, nothing, zip, nada, not even one measly school district science curriculum.

/one is not remotely like the other, it's an absurd comparison, get it?

I understand your point now. It has functionality in your framework as you present it. At this time. I do personally think that the Social Justice initiatives and the Zinn books already in the school systems are a greater current threat to our liberty.

349 Sharmuta  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:53:20am

re: #346 Slumbering Behemoth

I'm just hanging out in there.

350 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:54:18am

re: #346 Slumbering Behemoth

Shit! Did I miss an opportunity here? Damn my slow reading!

:checks the lounge:

Yeah, ya can't keep a woman waiting, right? Heheh...

Okay, I can, but most guys-...

351 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:55:36am

re: #111 cslepage

I don't accept evolution as evidence of "sane science" anymore than I do global warming.

Intelligent Design has a lot in common with (anthropogenic) Global Warming. Both are hypotheses that are insufficiently supported by evidence to be distinguished as Theories. And both are being advanced by persons and groups who seek to gain political and/or monetary advantage by so doing.

Follow the money.

352 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:56:01am

re: #337 Killian Bundy

It's a free country, you can't throttle the ID fringe's right to free speech any more than you can that of white supremacists.

Try as they might, ID is going nowhere and is hardly a clear and present danger to secular science education in the United States.

/the law concerning teaching creation as science in public schools is well settled and has been for decades

We shall continue to see them trying different strategies and tactics to work around it, though, and each failed attempt will impoverish a local school district or a state school administration, and cost many students. And they'll continue to find clueless suckers willing to buy into their scams.

I just hope that the latest version gets overturned in Louisiana pronto - as soon as some of the Disco Institute's (or their connected creationist publishing houses') 'supplementary materials' get busted in public high school science classes.

353 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:56:25am

re: #342 Salem

But the chaos that has ensued from daring to counter the DI here has been very telling, Killian, and the cat is already out of the bag.

Some people of faith (the majority), who don't believe in ID of YEC, feel insulted when they're lumped in with the nuts because of the use of imprecise language that paints all people of faith with the broad brush of ID/YEC.

/whether it's done unintentionally or otherwise

354 Racer X  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:56:51am

There has been a "surge" in people pushing ID lately.

*cough* Ben Stein *cough*.

If the ID proponents succeed in getting this on the agenda in PUBLIC schools, guess who will come storming in next?

355 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:57:56am

re: #120 pat

Not my type. I prefer the full package. This girl is a few burgers less than a Take Out.

Hell, I'd "take her out."

Blonde bimbos are a natural resource.

356 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:59:45am

re: #352 Salamantis

I just hope that the latest version gets overturned in Louisiana pronto - as soon as some of the Disco Institute's (or their connected creationist publishing houses') 'supplementary materials' get busted in public high school science classes.

Louisiana Will Face Lawsuit If New Law Brings Religion Into Public School Science Classes, Says Americans United

/the lawyers are way ahead of you

357 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:00:30am

re: #353 Killian Bundy

Some people of faith (the majority), who don't believe in ID of YEC, feel insulted when they're lumped in with the nuts because of the use of imprecise language that paints all people of faith with the broad brush of ID/YEC.

/whether it's done unintentionally or otherwise

Ah! Now we're getting somewhere!

*ahem*

And when that happens, how does that make you feel?

358 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:04:28am

re: #340 jeremy1013

Coming from a Creationist, I think you have a good point Chrisbg99. There are some major Creationists who agree with you: Dr. Kurt Wise is a palentologist that did his doctoral work under Stephen J Gould, and is a young earth creationist, believes in the whole seven day creation story, the works. He says essentially the same thing. The work that he is doing is pretty amazing. Last I heard he was assembling a team of linguists, chemists, physicists...etc.. to put together a model. I had a copy of his draft model, but he told me when he gave it to me that it was already outdated. It was constantly being updated and changed, i.e. evolving.

You mean this guy?

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Wise has said he believes, according to a literal reading of the Bible, "that the earth is young, and the universe is young, I would suggest that it’s less than ten thousand years in age." He believes that science can be used to support and demonstrate these claims.[4] Despite believing that science supports his position, Wise has written that "if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate."[5] When asked if scientific conclusions should be constrained by the Bible, Wise answered that "science has never been closed to people who had ideas they wouldn't change. Every scientist has a set of presuppositions and assumptions that he never questions."[6]

As a young child interested in science, Wise tentatively adopted an old Earth creationist point of view after doing a science fair project on the geologic column, but was not completely satisfied with that decision.

What nagged me was that even if the days were long periods of time, the order was still out of whack. After all, science said the sun came before the earth—or at least at the same time—and the Bible said that the earth came three days before the sun. Whereas science said that the sea creatures came before plants and the land creatures came before flying creatures, the Bible indicated that plants preceded sea creatures and flying creatures preceded land creatures. On the other hand, making the days millions of years long seemed to take away most of the conflict. I thus determined to shelve these problems in the back recesses of my mind.[7]

Later, as a sophomore in high school, he took a newly-purchsed Bible and a pair of scissors and cut out every verse which could not be interpreted literally if scientific determinations on the age of the earth and evolution were true. He pursued this task with a flashlight under the covers of his bed for several months; at the end, he had removed so much material that "with the cover of the Bible taken off, I attempted to physically lift the Bible from the bed between two fingers. Yet, try as I might, and even with the benefit of intact margins throughout the pages of Scripture, I found it impossible to pick up the Bible without it being rent in two.[7] Wise decided to reject evolution instead of Biblical literalism, deciding

that the rejection of evolution does not necessarily involve the rejection of all of science. In fact, I have come to learn that science owes its very existence and rationale to the claims of Scripture. On the other hand, I have also learned that evolution is not the only claim of modern science which must be rejected if Scripture is assumed to be true.[7]

359 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:05:51am

re: #354 Racer X

If the ID proponents succeed in getting this on the agenda in PUBLIC schools

They've gotten their asses kicked in court every time they've tried it.

/after all these decades of mounting adverse case law and an increasingly secular society, it's just not going to happen

360 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:06:45am

re: #349 Sharmuta

Re:Lizard Lounge,

I get this lame message:

"Sorry, your browser is not Java enabled, please visit our java support pages"

Yet, I can confirm that Java is enabled on my browser.

Any suggestions?

361 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:07:55am

re: #347 Salamantis

He was no materialist. He reasoned a prime mover had to exist, whatever its nature is. The point is that the morons who go around trying to stop the ID conversation aren't addressing the premises of the IDers in the same category. They are just running around yelling, "Religion, religion, religion."

I think, based on the Aristotle quotes, that they are intellectual chicken sh*t, lightweights. I don't expect them to be though. Most of the "scientists" out there, don't know the first thing about the history of their discipline, nor can most of them talk about the great ideas outside their field.

362 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:09:42am

re: #358 Salamantis

More on Kurt Wise:

In a 2006 article for Answers in Genesis, Wise expressed concern for the status of the young Earth belief at Christian colleges and universities where "a survey of Wheaton College students which indicated that while 47% of incoming students believed in a young Earth, only 27% did so at the time the survey was taken.[8] Wise has said that "we need to train Southern Baptist pastors to equip young people to engage Darwinism from elementary school on. We also need to train Southern Baptists to recognize Darwinist thinking in ways that are subtle that they don't even recognize."

Wise has been called the "most honest" creationist by Richard Dawkins, as opposed to others who, he would claim, purposely deceive their audiences.[5] But he criticizes Wise for his predetermined conclusions and ability to continue believing in creationism "if all the evidence in the universe turns against [it]." Dawkins wrote that "this leaves me, as a scientist, speechless. I cannot imagine what it must be like to have a mind capable of such doublethink." This is because "we have it on the authority of a man who may well be creationism’s most highly qualified and most intelligent scientist that no evidence, no matter how overwhelming, no matter how all-embracing, no matter how devastatingly convincing, can ever make any difference."[5]

Wise's arguments about geology have been criticized

363 Sharmuta  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:11:44am

re: #360 Slumbering Behemoth

Did you visit the support pages? We can try again tomorrow night.

364 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:12:24am

re: #359 Killian Bundy

Publick Skools? Do they still exist? I thought they passed on with the 80s.

365 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:13:47am

re: #357 Salem

And when that happens, how does that make you feel?

Christian bashing sucks, again, whether unintentional or otherwise. Most Christians don't believe in ID or YEC.

/Christians, like atheists, aren't a monolithic category

366 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:14:40am

re: #359 Killian Bundy

They've gotten their asses kicked in court every time they've tried it.

And have cost every local school district they've perpetrated their bogus shenanigans upon a great deal of money in needless litigation that could be better spent elsewhere. So...yay?

/still scratching my head

367 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:16:46am

re: #362 Salamantis

OMG, if they have been criticized, they must be false.

Wise doesn't hide his faith. If you are on a witchhunt for people who have a hierarchical epistemology, you found one. But, if we are going to disqualify him because of that, you'd better have a damn good reason for not throwing out most of the heavyweights in the history of science.

368 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:19:20am

re: #361 jeremy1013

He was no materialist. He reasoned a prime mover had to exist, whatever its nature is. The point is that the morons who go around trying to stop the ID conversation aren't addressing the premises of the IDers in the same category. They are just running around yelling, "Religion, religion, religion."

I think, based on the Aristotle quotes, that they are intellectual chicken sh*t, lightweights. I don't expect them to be though. Most of the "scientists" out there, don't know the first thing about the history of their discipline, nor can most of them talk about the great ideas outside their field.

Actually, he turned Platonic Idealism on its head, and as such, was the first Empiricist. But he would most assuredly have blanched and had an attack of apoplexy had he been informed that his 'prime mover' - which was of the same class as other Greek demiurges, and to be distinguished from the pantheon of their Gods (Zeus and the Gang) - was being twisted to argue for the universal hegemony of what was, during Aristotle's time, considered by the Greeks to be little more than a Semitic mountain god (384-322 BC).

369 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:19:40am

re: #186 Killian Bundy

Look, those who believe in Creation have comprised a large segment of American society since it's inception. In fact, up until the early 20th century, Creation was taught as science. Did that lead to a Taliban like society? Ever since then, American society and public education has become more secular with time.

Name one public school district in the United States where ID/Creationism is currently taught as part of an approved science curriculum?

Take your time.

/or run around screaming "the sky is falling!" for all I care

Boy, Killian, you have really become a Johnny One-Note on this particular aspect of the topic. On every I.D. thread I've read, there you are, popping up to say "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

You know, you are partially right. AFAIK, there currently are no public school districts teaching "Intelligent Design" as part of the science curriculum, any more than than there are public school districts teaching astrology as part of the economics curriculum.

But we don't have a well-funded lobby group pushing to have astrology taught as economics, do we?

370 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:19:52am

re: #366 Slumbering Behemoth

Yeah, I can't really see it from their point of view, on why they fight to change the curriculum period. Common schools are on their way out. Does ANYone you know who really cares about their kid's education send them to a public school? Come on.

371 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:20:10am

re: #366 Slumbering Behemoth

And have cost every local school district they've perpetrated their bogus shenanigans upon a great deal of money in needless litigation that could be better spent elsewhere. So...yay?

/still scratching my head

So, what do you propose to do about it? If I tell you to jump off a bridge, will you?

/it's the local school boards that vote to stick their fingers in the light socket, knowing full well what will happen

372 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:22:26am

re: #367 jeremy1013

OMG, if they have been criticized, they must be false.

Wise doesn't hide his faith. If you are on a witchhunt for people who have a hierarchical epistemology, you found one. But, if we are going to disqualify him because of that, you'd better have a damn good reason for not throwing out most of the heavyweights in the history of science.

Well, the vast majority of the scientific heavyweights you seem to be counting were either already dead and gone before Darwin published Origin of Species, or were in disciplines far removed from the various life sciences impacted by evolutionary theory.

373 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:25:55am

re: #217 drmark

It seems you promote Evolution... So what title would you prefer? Rather than Evolutionist.... My apologies.

Realist would work.

374 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:27:30am

re: #365 Killian Bundy

Christian bashing sucks, again, whether unintentional or otherwise. Most Christians don't believe in ID or YEC.

/Christians, like atheists, aren't a monolithic category

I see. So should Christians, or religious people in general, be offended when the DI's behavior and agenda is criticized, since they aren't all one monolithic category?

Putting aside Hazzyday's particular comment, I mean.

Because many religious on this board have demonstrated an intolerance for any expression of any doubt in exactly what the DI is asserting. In fact, there has been a great gnashing of teeth. The issue has been pushed by them, unintentional or otherwise.

Or did I miss a similar controversy over music threads?

375 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:27:32am

re: #368 Salamantis

Empiricist? Don't make me laugh. Empiricism is a footnote to Aristotle. Only a fundamentalist creationist would think backwards through history like that (or fundamentalist Modern).

But, seriously, I don't think what you said is an actual argument against what I said. Or, at least you haven't shown it. I sense that you are arguing against my using the prime mover argument because it leads to "hegemony"?

376 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:28:41am

re: #369 Alberta Oil Peon

You know, you are partially right. AFAIK, there currently are no public school districts teaching "Intelligent Design" as part of the science curriculum, any more than than there are public school districts teaching astrology as part of the economics curriculum.

But we don't have a well-funded lobby group pushing to have astrology taught as economics, do we?

So what? Lot's of well funded fringe groups have agendas, that doesn't make them successful. ID is not a threat to secular science education in this country.

/at least not until they win at least one court case, which hasn't happened yet and won't happen in the future

377 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:29:09am

re: #365 Killian Bundy

/Christians, like atheists, aren't a monolithic category

That's certainly something I can agree with, and it does bear repeating. Such a sentiment can be applied to many ideologies.

378 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:32:15am

re: #374 Salem

Because many religious on this board have demonstrated an intolerance for any expression of any doubt in exactly what the DI is asserting. In fact, there has been a great gnashing of teeth. The issue has been pushed by them, unintentional or otherwise.

/and many of the complainers have have gotten the heave ho

379 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:32:46am

re: #369 Alberta Oil Peon

Boy, Killian, you have really become a Johnny One-Note on this particular aspect of the topic. On every I.D. thread I've read, there you are, popping up to say "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

He's right, KB, that is the look of it.

380 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:34:36am

re: #378 Killian Bundy

/and many of the complainers have have gotten the heave ho

Do you feel they've been dealt an injustice?

381 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:36:17am

re: #375 jeremy1013

Empiricist? Don't make me laugh. Empiricism is a footnote to Aristotle. Only a fundamentalist creationist would think backwards through history like that (or fundamentalist Modern).

Aristotle wrote about many things, but what he had to write about science is indeed properly characterized as empiricist, and includes the first rough draft of a scientific method of investigation.

But, seriously, I don't think what you said is an actual argument against what I said. Or, at least you haven't shown it. I sense that you are arguing against my using the prime mover argument because it leads to "hegemony"?

I'm just saying that you are thinking of when you invoke Aristotle's Prime Mover and what Aristotle intended are entirely different things. You might as well argue for the existence of dolphins by holding up a shark. He most ceertainly didn't mean anything more than an Uncaused cause, something to give an initial impetus. Definitely, he did not mean a continuously involved Designer. And he was speaking of the Universe in general, not terrestrial life in particular.

No Biblical creationism of the literalist Genesis variety can be spied anywhere NEAR Aristotle's theories.

382 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:38:50am

re: #377 Slumbering Behemoth

Neither Christianity nor atheism by their nature are necessarily ideology. Read Kirk's essay, "The Errors of Ideology." Dr. Google can give it to you.....Sorry for the lecture, I'm off my soapbox now.

383 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:40:26am

re: #380 Salem

Do you feel they've been dealt an injustice?

/that's not for me to say, it is what it is, I'm just a guest here

384 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:43:58am

re: #379 Salem

He's right, KB, that is the look of it.

If the shoe fits . . .

/the body of evidence shows that ID isn't a threat to secular science education in this country, only a persistent nuisance

385 Slumbering Behemoth  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:46:01am

re: #363 Sharmuta

Yes, but it tells me that I am using a version of Netscape, rather than Firefox. Odd. At any rate, I'll catch up with you tomorrow. We'll work something out.

386 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:46:29am

re: #381 Salamantis

He most ceertainly didn't mean anything more than an Uncaused cause, something to give an initial impetus. Definitely, he did not mean a continuously involved Designer. And he was speaking of the Universe in general, not terrestrial life in particular.

Salamantis, it's a logical argument, not a work of art or literature. His reasoning, did not preclude (logically) a "continuously involved designer" nor am I forced to conclude (logically) that a "continuously involved designer" is necessary (logically) to it.

387 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:57:07am

Um, I vote that if we are going to burn IDers and Creationists at the stake, we make sure they have a Bible in one hand, and a home chemistry set under the other arm. We're having trouble keeping the attention of the masses...

388 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:57:30am

re: #386 jeremy1013

Salamantis, it's a logical argument, not a work of art or literature. His reasoning, did not preclude (logically) a "continuously involved designer" nor am I forced to conclude (logically) that a "continuously involved designer" is necessary (logically) to it.

You have to realize that for the Greeks, the Universe always was; they took the Parmenidean statement "From nothing, nothing comes' seriously, applying it to Gods and Universe alike. Thus, the Prime Mover was, for the Greeks, not a Creator, but just a force that set a pre-existent but static Universe into motion. For them, there was no God creating a Universe ex nihilo, nor did it physically configure or organize matter according to any patterns; it just pushed it - once - and it has kept moving ever since.

btw: Parmenides and Heraclitus - the philosophers of Rest and Motion - are two of my favorites. Whenever I am writing a philosophical treatise, I imagine one of them on each shoulder. Until they are both nodding and smiling, I have not yet finished.

Greek philosophy is well known. You are entitled to have your own opinions about it; what you are NOT entitled to have are your own facts.

389 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:59:56am

re: #387 jeremy1013

Um, I vote that if we are going to burn IDers and Creationists at the stake, we make sure they have a Bible in one hand, and a home chemistry set under the other arm. We're having trouble keeping the attention of the masses...

They get to be the burnees this time? hehe

390 Sharmuta  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:05:56am

re: #387 jeremy1013

Oh, brother.

391 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:08:50am

re: #383 Killian Bundy

/that's not for me to say, it is what it is, I'm just a guest here

It may not be for you to say if it is an injustice but that doesn't mean you don't have have feelings about it. A few were friends, right? They might have done it to themselves, but they were cool on the anti-terror threads. Charles starts coming out in support of evolution and the scientific method and they go bananas. And yet were all supposedly in the same foxhole.

It's not enough for them to agree to disagree. They insist on Genesis and when they don't get that, they insist we shut up about it. Why would anyone defend that behavior? And if they didn't agree with ID being taught in public schools, why did they get themselves banned over it? They've been consistent in their intolerance and deception. And so they've kept the issue alive.

I think Charles has been concerned about this for some time. He saw the posters that defended European nationalists right out of the gate. And when he ran evolution threads (which has been going on longer than some lizards are aware of) he saw the people who wished to sow ignorance and demonize reason. And teaching ID is just the tip of that iceberg. Down the road a little, when push comes to shove, who knows what they are capable of? One group is nationalist, the other is religionist. The nationalists get compared to nazis and the religionists get compared to.. those other religionists we know so well. If the shoes doesn't fit, then the issue goes away. But they keep it going. And you run interference, it seems.

So some religious people got their feelings hurt. So what else is new?

392 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:13:25am

re: #391 Salem

A few were friends, right?

It's an anonymous blog.

/I don't make imaginary friends

393 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:16:46am

re: #384 Killian Bundy

If the shoe fits . . .

/the body of evidence shows that ID isn't a threat to secular science education in this country, only a persistent nuisance

Killian, the organized I.D. groups, such as the Discovery Institute, are certainly trying to be a threat to to secular science education. They are constantly pushing to have their non-scientific "science" taught in public schools. (why do I keep having visions of the Bizarro World portrayed in the old Superman comic books)

As far as analogies to the Taliban go, I'd say that it is more a matter of degree than of kind. Both the organized I.D.ers and the Taliban derive their worldview from a literal reading of received wisdom in a Holy Book. The Taliban and their ilk are all too ready to use violence as a means of imposing their worldview upon others. To date, the I.D.er's have been content to resort to subterfuge and lawfare. (And I'd be remiss if I failed to point out that Wahabiist Islamists, fellow-travellers of the Taliban, have also been resorting to to lawfare wherever they find it to be useful.)

I have never been "Christian-bashing" on these threads. I may have expressed a degree of exasperation with the foolish notions advanced by some people who claim to be Christians, but I would not care to bash Christians in general. I believe Christianity in general to be, and to have been, a force for good, even if I personally cannot swallow some of the superstition attendant to it. And based on quite an extensive reading of the "I.D. threads" here, I'd say the out-and-out "Christian-bashers" are a small minority of commentors.

The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, but by the tone of your (numerous) posts on this topic, you would have us slack off on our vigilance. I have to ask, "Why?"

394 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:17:16am

re: #388 Salamantis

To paraphrase an earlier comment: the Greeks are not monolithic. To take one phrase from one or two of the presocratics and impose it on Aristotle does not do him justice. I guess it is useful if you wish to pacify a professor who thinks in the binaries of Modern philosophy.

Every "characteristic," "attribute," or "theology" of the prime mover that has come up in the course of our conversation has come from your imposition, not me. I am not the one that is saying that Aristotle was really a fundamentalist Creationist, but the way you describe him, based on your assumption about the Greek context (which is not an essential assumption of Aristotle's prime mover argument, nor is your assumption a foregone conclusion), you seem to think he was an earlier version of Stephen J Gould.

395 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:17:52am

re: #384 Killian Bundy

If the shoe fits . . .

/the body of evidence shows that ID isn't a threat to secular science education in this country, only a persistent nuisance

And it's their constitutional right! And it's our constitutional right to oppose them regardless of how much they wail and screech about it. So what do you want?

As long as we're clear about the sacred cow mortality rate thing... They aren't being oppressed. They're just being opposed and not taking it very well.

396 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:19:28am

re: #392 Killian Bundy

It's an anonymous blog.

/I don't make imaginary friends

LOL! Well, I think you do. Their existence can be proven, at least.

397 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:19:39am

re: #391 Salem

And you run interference, it seems.

Excuse me? Is it a sin to keep pointing out that ID proponents have had zero success trying to push their well funded agenda into public school science curricula?

/because, in the overall perspective, I think that's an important and extremely relevant point

398 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:19:47am

re: #390 Sharmuta

Compliments of Monty Python:
Peasants: We have found a witch! (A witch! a witch!)
Burn her burn her!

Peasant 1: We have found a witch, may we burn her?
(cheers)
Vladimir: How do you known she is a witch?
P2: She looks like one!
V: Bring her forward
(advance)
Woman: I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!
V: ehh... but you are dressed like one.
W: They dressed me up like this!
All: naah no we didn't... no.
W: And this isn't my nose, it's a false one.
(V lifts up carrot)
V: Well?
P1: Well we did do the nose
V: The nose?
P1: ...And the hat, but she is a witch!
(all: yeah, burn her burn her!)
V: Did you dress her up like this?
P1: No! (no no... no) Yes. (yes yeah) a bit (a bit bit a bit) But she has got a wart!
(P3 points at wart)
V: What makes you think she is a witch?
P2: Well, she turned me into a newt!
V: A newt?!
(P2 pause & look around)
P2: I got better.
(pause)
P3: Burn her anyway! (burn her burn her burn!)
(king walks in)

399 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:25:40am

What Monty Python didn't tell you was that the scene is taken from an actual instance of an ID professor trying to get tenure at a State University here in the States.

400 Alberta Oil Peon  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:26:43am

Well the old eyelids are getting heavy here (if they were intelligently designed, they'd have little latches to hold them up until you were ready to sleep, wouldn't they?).

Time to go saw a few logs. Night, all.

401 Sharmuta  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:26:50am

re: #398 jeremy1013

One of my favorite "Holy Grail" bits, and, as that bit continues, a good example of the idiotic science many of us here are opposed to pushing on America's kids.

P.S.- I weigh more than a duck.

402 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:29:40am

re: #394 jeremy1013

To paraphrase an earlier comment: the Greeks are not monolithic. To take one phrase from one or two of the presocratics and impose it on Aristotle does not do him justice. I guess it is useful if you wish to pacify a professor who thinks in the binaries of Modern philosophy.

Binariies can be useful at times to cut through obfuscatory verbiage. Either X WAS a position of Aristotle's or X WAS NOT. Accoding to the doctrine of Excluded Middle, there is no Sophist wiggle room between the horns of this dilemma.

Every "characteristic," "attribute," or "theology" of the prime mover that has come up in the course of our conversation has come from your imposition, not me. I am not the one that is saying that Aristotle was really a fundamentalist Creationist, but the way you describe him, based on your assumption about the Greek context (which is not an essential assumption of Aristotle's prime mover argument, nor is your assumption a foregone conclusion), you seem to think he was an earlier version of Stephen J Gould.

No, I think Aristotle was an amazingly insightful fellow who did wonders with what was known during his day and immensely advanced many fields. I will not lie about what his positions in fact were in order to derive faux support for any pre-existent position of mine from him. Nor will I acquiesce when I perceive others as endeavoring to do so. In any case, such lies are easily revealed.

Aristotle was neither an exponent of Christian literalist genesis creationism, nor an exponent of Darwin's and Mendel's theories. He lived two milllennia too early for the latter, and as to the former, I sincerely doubt that he was concerned with what was happening in the hinterlands with the minor tribal deity of a foreign people.

Aristotle offers your stance no succor; give up attempting to nurse from the teat of Greek philosophy in order to support Christian creationist positions; the systems are quite alien to each other. In fact, to the degree that Augustine and Aquinas infused Greek philosophy into early Christianity, it was to that degree that they altered it into other than its original self.

403 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:31:46am

re: #393 Alberta Oil Peon

the organized I.D. groups, such as the Discovery Institute, are certainly trying to be a threat to to secular science education. They are constantly pushing to have their non-scientific "science" taught in public schools.

Again, so what? Have they even come close to succeeding? Why waste your time worrying about something that's not going to happen?

The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, but by the tone of your (numerous) posts on this topic, you would have us slack off on our vigilance. I have to ask, "Why?"

Right, what do you propose to do about it? What is your "vigilance" accomplishing?

/me, I'll sleep well at night and leave it up to the lawyers who know what they're doing and have the situation well in hand, just like they have for decades now

404 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:32:51am

re: #394 jeremy1013

With new, improved formatting!

To paraphrase an earlier comment: the Greeks are not monolithic. To take one phrase from one or two of the presocratics and impose it on Aristotle does not do him justice. I guess it is useful if you wish to pacify a professor who thinks in the binaries of Modern philosophy.

Binariies can be useful at times to cut through obfuscatory verbiage. Either X WAS a position of Aristotle's or X WAS NOT. Accoding to the doctrine of Excluded Middle, there is no Sophist wiggle room between the horns of this dilemma.

Every "characteristic," "attribute," or "theology" of the prime mover that has come up in the course of our conversation has come from your imposition, not me. I am not the one that is saying that Aristotle was really a fundamentalist Creationist, but the way you describe him, based on your assumption about the Greek context (which is not an essential assumption of Aristotle's prime mover argument, nor is your assumption a foregone conclusion), you seem to think he was an earlier version of Stephen J Gould.

No, I think Aristotle was an amazingly insightful fellow who did wonders with what was known during his day and immensely advanced many fields. I will not lie about what his positions in fact were in order to derive faux support for any pre-existent position of mine from him. Nor will I acquiesce when I perceive others as endeavoring to do so. In any case, such lies are easily revealed.

Aristotle was neither an exponent of Christian literalist genesis creationism, nor an exponent of Darwin's and Mendel's theories. He lived two milllennia too early for the latter, and as to the former, I sincerely doubt that he was concerned with what was happening in the hinterlands with the minor tribal deity of a foreign people.

Aristotle offers your stance no succor; give up attempting to nurse from the teat of Greek philosophy in order to support Christian creationist positions; the systems are quite alien to each other. In fact, to the degree that Augustine and Aquinas infused Greek philosophy into early Christianity, it was to that degree that they altered it into other than its original self.

405 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:33:09am

zzz

406 cslepage  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:40:17am

re: #370 jeremy1013

Yeah, I can't really see it from their point of view, on why they fight to change the curriculum period. Common schools are on their way out. Does ANYone you know who really cares about their kid's education send them to a public school? Come on.

I care about my son's education and I send him to a public school. But as he progresses to higher grades, it's likely he won't be going to a public school.

407 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:44:06am

re: #406 cslepage

I care about my son's education and I send him to a public school. But as he progresses to higher grades, it's likely he won't be going to a public school.

Yeah; he might learn some science you don't like.

408 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:48:31am

re: #404 Salamantis

Salamantis, you still have not indicated anything *essential* to Aristotle's prime mover that bars me from claiming that there exists a prime mover as he defined it.

All you've said is that he would have never agreed with me. It's a sloppy argument. But, I don't have the time to talk about it. I must go to bed.

It has been good talking with you. I hope we can continue this.

409 jeremy1013  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:52:27am

re: #407 Salamantis

A dying institution of yesterday, if not dead already. Definitely a foremost concern of anyone trying to avoid hegemony.

410 cslepage  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:04:10am

re: #407 Salamantis

Yeah; he might learn some science you don't like.

They already have wasted time on things I don't like, such as celebrate Halloween and have Santa Claus visit the school. I'm sure at some point a line will be crossed that will lead us to taking him out of a public school, but hopefully we are not close to that point.

Besides, I'm more concerned with how he reacts to people with new and different ideas than the ideas themselves. For instance, if he were to treat people with different ideas as clueless, irrational, and dangerous, for no other reason than having a different belief, I'd be very concerned.

411 Aylios  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:06:41am

re: #135 Salamantis

The most immediate threat is that the selfsame Christian creationists who are behind the scenes getting laws like the one in Louisiana passed are the very ones who are networking with Islamocreationists in the Middle East. Wake up and smell the Turkish tobacco and the chicory coffee!

Totally unrelated, but I used to offer a chicory cappuccino (called it a chiccocino) in my café, but only sold about 2 a year. So I tossed out the can and took it off the menu.

412 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:16:43am

re: #408 jeremy1013

Salamantis, you still have not indicated anything *essential* to Aristotle's prime mover that bars me from claiming that there exists a prime mover as he defined it.

All you've said is that he would have never agreed with me. It's a sloppy argument. But, I don't have the time to talk about it. I must go to bed.

It has been good talking with you. I hope we can continue this.

The issue was indeed whether or not Aristotle would have agreed with you.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Since you were the one who originally brought him up to buttress your position, all that it required to refute your invocation of him for that purpose is to demonstrate that there is absolutely, positively no way that Aristotle's Prime Mover can be warped into performing the tasks that Christian Genesis Literalist Creationists would set for it, without a massive disfiguring, twisting and misconstrual of his original concept, tantamount to morphing it into something wholly other than, and utterly unrecognizeable as, its original self. And that much, I did indeed demonstrate.

Aristotle's Prime Mover did not create the Universe ex hihilo, or physically configure or organize matter according to any patterns or principles, but simply set an eternally pre-existent Universe in motion, and did not act continuously upon that Universe, or involve itself in the subsequent genesis of terrestrial life (there, the Greeks, including Aristotle himself, believed in spontaneous generation; things like horsehairs becoming worms or river logs becoming crocodiles), but acted only that once, to give an initial impetus shove to a static and inert mass.

All of these Aristotelian positions are, of course, heretical and blasphemous anathema to Christian Genesis Literalist Creationists.

413 Aylios  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:16:54am

re: #168 ggt

I hear if you are ever in the area, Charles has a pretty nifty creamery and microbrewery in Sub-basement, er, well, you know.

My bet is that Charles if far too busy blogging and cycling to feed his lizards ice-cream and beer. But I sure wouldn't mind bringing him a few nice cold Kro (Kronenbourg: it's what we drink here in Alsace) to keep him cool and have the left-over ones myself.

414 Aylios  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:19:54am

Darn, why am I always the last guy in the room?!

415 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:20:52am

re: #410 cslepage

They already have wasted time on things I don't like, such as celebrate Halloween and have Santa Claus visit the school. I'm sure at some point a line will be crossed that will lead us to taking him out of a public school, but hopefully we are not close to that point.

Besides, I'm more concerned with how he reacts to people with new and different ideas than the ideas themselves. For instance, if he were to treat people with different ideas as clueless, irrational, and dangerous, for no other reason than having a different belief, I'd be very concerned.

I most sincerely hope that he develops the discrimination necessary to recognizing when new ideas are and are not clueless, irrational and/or dangerous, for some are bound to be either, and equally important, the discrimination necessary to recognize when ideas he already holds may be these things.

416 Tigger2005  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:37:29am

Half chimpanzee? What an ignoramus!

Actually, we share 98% of our genome with chimpanzees.

417 Josephine  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 4:59:41am

re: #159 Moe Katz

re: #275 Moe Katz

Well, here I am, early in the morning, posting on a dead thread.

I find it odd that someone accused Charles of creating a wedge.

This is a common bully tactic: they've taken something the DI is actually doing (The Wedge Strategy), turned it around and accused Charles of doing it when, in fact, he opposes the wedge.

From one Moe to another (not intended as an insult but as a celebration of the name): Moe Berg

418 Throbert McGee  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:15:49am

re: #368 Salamantis

But [Aristotle] would most assuredly have blanched and had an attack of apoplexy had he been informed that his 'prime mover' [was being compared with] a Semitic mountain god (384-322 BC).

And looking at it from the other side, if YHWH is the One True God, I wouldn't expect Him to be thrilled at the suggestion that He is kinda/sorta the same beastie as Aristotle's Prime Mover, simply because someone want's to score an easy rhetorical point against "materialists."

(Cf. "Not only does Christian Scripture teach us that homosexuality is a sin, but all the false religions say so, too!")

419 Throbert McGee  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:17:29am

re: #418 Throbert McGee

because someone want's to

Oh, aaargh. That's another 10 billion years in Purgatory for me.

420 Josephine  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:25:17am

re: #419 Throbert McGee

Oh, aaargh. That's another 10 billion years in Purgatory for me.

LOL, I had to check and see if you were saying that after watching the video I posted!

421 littleO  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:28:39am

So, I'm assuming there is not many, here, who are going to support elective religion classes for public schools?

422 Throbert McGee  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:30:51am

re: #416 Tigger2005

Half chimpanzee? What an ignoramus!

Actually, we share 98% of our genome with chimpanzees.

I hope no one takes offense when I say that ever since reading that "Jesus was half chimp" quote, I've had this horribly blasphemous mashup of Lancelot Link and The Greatest Story Ever Told running through my head.

("Truly he was the Son of Kong!" -- John Wayne)

423 Naso Tang  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:33:28am

re: #418 Throbert McGee


(Cf. "Not only does Christian Scripture teach us that homosexuality is a sin, but all the false religions say so, too!")

Morning,

I'm not an expert, but I seem to recall that the Old Testament is pretty easy on sex of any kind, as long as it's done for the "right"reason; gross even.

Maybe God had a change of heart somewhere along the line (who'd a thought that?), but the beauty of the bible is that it can be all things to all people.

Bible says gay marriage OK

424 Naso Tang  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:34:18am

re: #421 littleO

So, I'm assuming there is not many, here, who are going to support elective religion classes for public schools?

There's many on one side, none on the other.

425 Peacekeeper  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:51:25am

Amidst the mists and coldest frosts
With barest wrists and stoutest boasts
He thrusts his fists against the posts
And still insists he sees the ghosts.

426 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:58:23am

re: #116 Sharmuta

But literal Biblical creation is "sane science", huh?


Hey, you're talking about the guy who is upset that terrorists aren't slaughtering thousands of innocents in America. You can't expect anything logical from someone that twisted.

427 scottishbuzzsaw  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:58:45am

re: #393 Alberta Oil Peon

Your comment is a keeper. Thank you.

428 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:05:28am

re: #192 maddogg

The sad thing is that scientists supported Global Warming without evidence in the first place. It means they are subject to influence by their prejudices, just like any person walking down the street, and they did not learn the first rule of the scientific method.

I'd say it's more a matter that they wanted money, and were willing to toe the GW line to get grants. Funding for science has become too politicized.

429 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:14:03am

re: #259 Moe Katz

Even if that poll reports double the true value it belies the claim that creationists are a "small and fanatical minority," as someone claimed.

Then explain why the Creationist candidate is getting killed in the election this very thread discusses? A heartland state should be overwhelming in favor of his beliefs if that poll is accurate.

430 Thanos  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:16:03am

re: #421 littleO

So, I'm assuming there is not many, here, who are going to support elective religion classes for public schools?

I support it and most school districts do. Most school districts to have classes on Religion. I took comparative world religions in high school, why don't you check your local schools before you assume it's not already there?

431 Lawrence Schmerel  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:17:07am

Although I don't doubt evolution, I am a Lawrence Republican of sorts.

432 littleO  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:17:31am

re#424 naso tang

none? Thats somehow shameful.

Although, judging by replies I've had I'm not surprised.
If I say, the ocean can be calm and windless for days, even weeks on end. Many will point out all the storms and tragedy that have occured over millennium. Then despise every utterance made thereafter. This from those who touts themselves righteous men.
If someone says Jesus was more than a righteous man. More than a good and wise teacher they are met with all sorts of calumnity because of it.
But, there is none of the same reaction if another compares Jesus with Zoroastrian mythology. There is no dispute when another claims Jesus a myth. That those are fools and worse who could even believe in fairy tales and superstition.
But, here resides only such who are honorable.

433 Peacekeeper  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:21:57am
I'm not the pheasant plucker, I'm the pheasant plucker's son.
I'm only plucking pheasants 'til the pheasant plucker comes.
434 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:27:02am

re: #433 Peacekeeper
I like the "fig plucker" version better myself. Great way to win a tongue-twister challenge as a lot of people won't even try to say it out loud.

I'm not the fig plucker, I'm the fig plucker's son. But I'll pluck figs until the fig plucker comes."
435 Peacekeeper  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:30:57am

I'm a smart feller. I'm a feller smart

436 Rugby the Rat  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:46:53am

re: #432 littleO


If someone says Jesus was more than a righteous man. More than a good and wise teacher they are met with all sorts of calumnity because of it.

HELLO! i am rugby the rat and here is a teeny weeny tiny itsy bitsy VIOLIN in case anyone wants it.

ps. CHILDERN!! plz be cautiond that violins are actually not very tasty at all! in that photo i was only pretending to eat one ok?!

pps. improtant EXCEPTion to previous rule: violins (and stirnged instruments in general) are safe to eat IF they are made out of delicious chocolate cake like this one! however, you cant play music on cake violins...

437 Naso Tang  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:54:02am

re: #432 littleO

re#424 naso tang

none? Thats somehow shameful.

You don't appreciate a nice concise comment designed to elicit a "huh?

438 Peacekeeper  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:00:05am
Aye, Starbuck; aye, my hearties all round; it was Moby Dick that dismasted me; Moby Dick that brought me to this dead stump I stand on now. Aye, aye, he shouted with a terrific, loud, animal sob, like that of a heart-stricken moose; Aye, aye! it was that accursed white whale that razeed me; made a poor pegging lubber of me for ever and a day! Then tossing both arms, with measureless imprecations he shouted out: Aye, aye! and I'll chase him round Good Hope, and round the horn, and round the norway maelstrom, and round perdition's flames before I give him up. And this is what ye have shipped for, men! to chase that white whale on both sides of land, and over all sides of earth, till he spouts black blood and rolls fin out. What say ye, men, will ye splice hands on it, now? I think ye do look brave. Aye, aye! shouted the harpooneers and seamen, running closer to the excited old man: A sharp eye for the White Whale; a sharp lance for Moby Dick! God bless ye, he seemed to half sob and half shout. God bless ye, men. Steward! go draw the great measure of grog. But what's this long face about, Mr. Starbuck; wilt thou not chase the white whale? art not game for Moby Dick?
439 ASU86PE  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:03:16am

Public education endorses Darwinism and filling our jails with the offspring of that education.

Punish Christianity and criminals will be all you see.

440 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:04:32am

re: #439 ASU86PE

Public education endorses Darwinism and filling our jails with the offspring of that education.

Punish Christianity and criminals will be all you see.

WTF are you smoking?

441 ASU86PE  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:14:30am

I am saying that if you draw a line too close to the edge of society and the faith of some, you call everyone a criminal such as the communist did in the forties and fifties. At times these posts range too close for me to be too comfortable not to complain.

re: #440 mossley

P.S. Please don't use that language when you talk to me.

442 jpkoch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:23:05am

In a perfect federalist, libertarian society, the local school boards could teach what they want. As long as the school board and its administration doesn't rub up against the enumerated rights of the Constitution, all is well. In a decentralized society, where local taxes stay local (as opposed to going to a centralized state school board, like most states have today), the people are free to chose what their schools will teach, whether they can offer public prayer or hang crucifixes in every class room (or Stars of Davis, or paintings of the Good Shepard). If a family is offended by what is taught, or not taught they can home school or send their children to a private school -or ultimately vote with their feet (a long American tradition). If a school district is hell bent on offending a large segment of its population, it will find itself eventually at a loss to find children to school, not to mention the parents to fund them.

All of this has been lost. Centralization not only has robbed the local villages and towns the ability to administer (or screw up) their own schools. But it has also put too much money and power into state-run education bureaucracies. Property taxes, the old main-stay for local schools, are now put into centralized general budget funds, and pay for an entire host of non-education projects. Now that the Feds are also involved, things like ID have become a "federal" issue, and not local. Personally, I don't think ID should be taught in schools, but if it is a big thing to people in Jerkwater Indiana (I live in Indiana and there are a few) then let them teach it.

443 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:25:31am

re: #441 ASU86PE

I am saying that if you draw a line too close to the edge of society and the faith of some, you call everyone a criminal such as the communist did in the forties and fifties. At times these posts range too close for me to be too comfortable not to complain.


Then post a link to a single poster who has done what you accused.


P.S. Please don't use that language when you talk to me.



Then don't post absolutely idiotic nonsense.

444 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:28:41am

re: #442 jpkoch


Personally, I don't think ID should be taught in schools, but if it is a big thing to people in Jerkwater Indiana (I live in Indiana and there are a few) then let them teach it.


And people in communities with large Muslim populations can ban anything that contradicts their faith. Communities with Aryan nation holdouts can teach that minorities aren't really people. Inner-city schools can have topics approved by the Nation of Islam and folks like Rev. Wright.

Personally, I think that's a pretty screwed up system.

445 charles_martel  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:33:40am

Why is there no convenient label for what I believe: that God used and guided evolution to create the world He had in mind....?

446 Tigger2005  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:43:52am

re: #445 charles_martel

Why is there no convenient label for what I believe: that God used and guided evolution to create the world He had in mind....?

I believe that's a teleologist.

447 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:44:37am

re: #417 Josephine

re: #275 Moe Katz

Well, here I am, early in the morning, posting on a dead thread.

I find it odd that someone accused Charles of creating a wedge.

This is a common bully tactic: they've taken something the DI is actually doing (The Wedge Strategy), turned it around and accused Charles of doing it when, in fact, he opposes the wedge.

From one Moe to another (not intended as an insult but as a celebration of the name): Moe Berg

It's called turnspeak:

[Link: www.eretzyisroel.org...]

448 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:46:37am

re: #421 littleO

So, I'm assuming there is not many, here, who are going to support elective religion classes for public schools?

Which religion? Comparative religion classes are usually reserved for college.

449 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:51:45am

re: #432 littleO

Want some unleavened loaf and goat cheese with that whine?

450 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:54:58am

re: #439 ASU86PE

Public education endorses Darwinism and filling our jails with the offspring of that education.

Punish Christianity and criminals will be all you see.

Actually, Christians and Muslims are the two religions whose prison populations are a greater percentage of the total than are their nonprison populations. Atheists and all other religions, especially the Buddhists, are underrepresented.

451 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:58:27am

re: #442 jpkoch

In a perfect federalist, libertarian society, the local school boards could teach what they want. As long as the school board and its administration doesn't rub up against the enumerated rights of the Constitution, all is well. In a decentralized society, where local taxes stay local (as opposed to going to a centralized state school board, like most states have today), the people are free to chose what their schools will teach, whether they can offer public prayer or hang crucifixes in every class room (or Stars of Davis, or paintings of the Good Shepard). If a family is offended by what is taught, or not taught they can home school or send their children to a private school -or ultimately vote with their feet (a long American tradition). If a school district is hell bent on offending a large segment of its population, it will find itself eventually at a loss to find children to school, not to mention the parents to fund them.

All of this has been lost. Centralization not only has robbed the local villages and towns the ability to administer (or screw up) their own schools. But it has also put too much money and power into state-run education bureaucracies. Property taxes, the old main-stay for local schools, are now put into centralized general budget funds, and pay for an entire host of non-education projects. Now that the Feds are also involved, things like ID have become a "federal" issue, and not local. Personally, I don't think ID should be taught in schools, but if it is a big thing to people in Jerkwater Indiana (I live in Indiana and there are a few) then let them teach it.

So I gather you're not a big fan of the Bill of Rights, especially that 1st Amendment thingie, ayy? The tyranny of the majority vs. the guaranteed rights of the minority must not be a central concern of yours...

452 Killian Bundy  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:38:53am

Well, I see the after the fact dingers have been busy. Same people every comment but Not the usual suspects (ID crazies) this time.

/birds of a feather gots to stick together

453 claire  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:40:53am

re: #370 jeremy1013

Does ANYone you know who really cares about their kid's education send them to a public school? Come on.

Umm, yes?

You really think the public schools have reached the point where only the unredeemable slaggards attend, so why worry about them, they're just low class ignoramuses anyway or what? A tad elitist, no?

How about the concept of caring about everybody's children getting the best education they can and thus not giving up on public schools, but fighting for them. Not everybody can afford private tuition.

454 kansas  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:42:33am

“These evolutionists are saying that Jesus was half-chimpanzee, so was Mohammed and Buddha,” said Alan Detrich, a 58-year-old Lawrence Republican who takes classes at Kansas University. “I don’t think that’s right.” ...

Well I don't know about Jesus and Buddha, but....................

455 kansas  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:44:30am

re: #440 mossley

WTF are you smoking?


Outlaw Christianity and only outlaws will be Christians.

456 israel4ever[deleted]  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:47:44am
457 jaunte  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:51:53am

re: #456 israel4ever

Your assertions are incorrect.
1. this place is not a 'religious people are stupid freaks' blog.
2. the evolution posts are not 'constant.'
3. there are plenty of posts about news and current events.

458 jpkoch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:54:32am

"So I gather you're not a big fan of the Bill of Rights, especially that 1st Amendment thingie, ayy? The tyranny of the majority vs. the guaranteed rights of the minority must not be a central concern of yours"

The Bill of Rights are target at Congress ("Congress shall make no...."), and not the local communities and states. In a Federalist Democracy, the states can pretty much do as they please as long as they do not violate the Constitution. The 1st Amendment prohibitions concerning religion were on Congress. Remember, when the Constitution was ratified, 2 states had state religions. The "tyranny of the majority" isn't exactly a tyranny, as the voters still have recourse to the law (ie elections), and recourse to leave a state or locale anytime they wish.

This arrangement may not be "just" for many, but it did take into account that at some time the "majority" must be able to govern. The Founders wished to put 99% of the governance at the lowest levels (ie state laws and not federal laws). Humans are not perfect. Many will make "unjust" or silly laws. The worst thing that could happen is to "federalize" this silliness or unjust tendency -which is what many judges have done.

459 littleO  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:01:04am

re#449 salamantis
you spell wine, wine, besisides i don't take wine, or, the blood of Christ, during Communion.

Thanks anyway!

460 rizz[deleted]  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:05:13am
461 jpkoch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:09:41am
And people in communities with large Muslim populations can ban anything that contradicts their faith. Communities with Aryan nation holdouts can teach that minorities aren't really people. Inner-city schools can have topics approved by the Nation of Islam and folks like Rev. Wright

Essentially, that's what we had until the 1950s. And I don't remember any revolutionary actions coming out of the schools. I do remember reading about private Lutheran schools being ordered not to teach German in their schools (in those days the Lutheran Liturgy was entirely in Hoch Deutsch). During Wilson's assault on civil liberties during The Great War, even the SCOTUS agreed he could do this during times of war. If anything, we've seen the opposite of what you describe. In the past there were schools that were ghetto schools, in that they reflected the local ethnic flavor of their community. But those incitations died out pretty quickly when the children found they couldn't function in society. In any event, schooling has always been local. The end results of poor schooling were obvious. If a town or locale doesn't have a problem with turning out ignorant students, that's their problem and not Washington's. If the schools are led by dangerous radicals, the Feds could close them down for in a heart beat (something in our politically correct world that is rare).

Today's assault on the majority has come from above and not below. The radical race conscious movements you describe are funded by national race organizations (Arab, Hispanic, etc...). They are also in league with the national teaching establishments and unions. This multi-culti assault is the opposite of what I described.

462 Throbert McGee  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:35:03am

re: #445 charles_martel

Why is there no convenient label for what I believe: that God used and guided evolution to create the world He had in mind....?

Actually, there IS an already-used label for this belief: "theistic evolution."

To be more precise, "theistic evolution" does not refer to one specific belief, but describes a range of viewpoints roughly similar to your own. (People from different religious backgrounds might have different opinions as to the extent that God was involved in the process -- was He constantly guiding it to ensure a particular outcome, or did He sometimes sit back and say to evolution: "Surprise Me!"? Also, any two Theistic Evolutionists might strongly disagree on matters such as the relationship that exists between our Brain, our Mind, and our Soul.)

463 Naso Tang  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:44:09am

re: #441 ASU86PE

I am saying that if you draw a line too close to the edge of society and the faith of some, you call everyone a criminal such as the communist did in the forties and fifties. At times these posts range too close for me to be too comfortable not to complain.

P.S. Please don't use that language when you talk to me.

WTF are you smoking?

464 larado  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:45:44am

If someone asked me to right a text book on the origins of man,,,,well it is very simple.We have no idea

465 Naso Tang  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:49:21am

re: #464 larado

If someone asked me to right a text book on the origins of man,,,,well it is very simple.We I have no idea

466 Naso Tang  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:54:49am

re: #464 larado

If someone asked me to right a text book on the origins of man,,,,well it is very simple.We I have no idea

467 Lynn B.  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 10:10:37am

re: #464 larado

If someone asked me to right a text book on the origins of man,,,,well it is very simple.We have no idea

OTOH, a lot of people seem to have no problem wronging a text book on The Origin of Species.

/sorry ... couldn't resist

468 Lynn B.  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 10:22:10am

re: #458 jpkoch

"So I gather you're not a big fan of the Bill of Rights, especially that 1st Amendment thingie, ayy? The tyranny of the majority vs. the guaranteed rights of the minority must not be a central concern of yours"

The Bill of Rights are target at Congress ("Congress shall make no...."), and not the local communities and states. In a Federalist Democracy, the states can pretty much do as they please as long as they do not violate the Constitution. The 1st Amendment prohibitions concerning religion were on Congress. Remember, when the Constitution was ratified, 2 states had state religions. The "tyranny of the majority" isn't exactly a tyranny, as the voters still have recourse to the law (ie elections), and recourse to leave a state or locale anytime they wish.

Perhaps you're unaware that the 14th Amendment, gradually but nevertheless steadily and now comprehensively, has been deemed to apply the entire Bill of Rights to the States. Which is why there are no longer any states that have state religions, among other things. Study up.

469 littleO  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 10:24:05am

re#430 Thanos:
This comparative religion BS is part of the whiny mouthed, watered down BS, that have been fostered upon us by the ' Liberalism ' that came from President Johnsons' ' Great society', Mcgovern lead Socialist, who plunged us for a generation into currancy devalueation and government subsidy, and the great experiment of Vatican ii, which proceded upon an unsuspecting laity, not through a proper council vote, but, though the skullduggery of reformers and later through the good, but, misguided intentions of Pope Paul vi.

But, I digress. As far as I'm concerned, the proposition for ID came from scientist who felt the underpinnings of 'evolutioary theory' was becoming untenable. ( I' ve read the grappling defenses of evolution and find it inconclusive ). I am perfectly willing to concede that ' Creationist " highjacked the term ID nefariously. But, that does not propel the genesis for the unrelenting post against the ideas and principles of christianity into validity.
The defense offered for those who went along with totalitarianism,and authoritarian judgements, has always been that I obeyed the law,or, I was a good citizen.
Bringing this into propective. I don't want the Federal government to cast their rules and regulation for a secular state upon me. I'm not asking for comparative religion classes, which are stupid. I want the Iman to argue against the Catholic apoligist.Those against the notions of Protestantism, Judahism and the eastern mystics. All of this arguement can be found in books and in real people who our orators on these subjects and programs could easily be established in this computer, digital, age where this type of education could be broght into classrooms all across the country at a reasonable expense.
Hey, I've blathered too long. Have a great day!

470 Moe Katz  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 10:55:33am

re: #417 Josephine

re: #275 Moe Katz

Well, here I am, early in the morning, posting on a dead thread.

I find it odd that someone accused Charles of creating a wedge.

Somehow this hasn't been understood. I'm not accusing Charles of creating a wedge with ulterior motives, I'm warning of the danger of inadvertently splitting his own constituency with a potential wedge issue. Surely this was clear in my two posts....

471 charles_martel  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 10:55:46am

re: #446 Tigger2005

I believe that's a teleologist.

Thanks!

472 Cygnus  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 11:35:06am

re: #26 Maximu§

OT

Has anyone here seen this picture of Chile's Chaitén volcano erupting with lava, ash and lightning?

The little-understood storms may be sparked when rock fragments, ash, and ice particles in the plume collide to produce static charges...its not greatly studied because most folk run away when this occurs.

Chile's Chaitén volcano

I was priviledged to see the eruption of Mt. St. Helens from my uncle's airplane. We saw lightning, but nothing as spectacular as those Chaiten photos. It was still an incredible sight; something I'll never forget for as long as I live.

473 spaceman  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:24:25pm

In my opinion, Mr. Deitrich displays a stunning lack of insight into the complex inner workings of a rock.

474 Lynn B.  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:32:51pm

re: #473 spaceman

In my opinion, Mr. Deitrich displays a stunning lack of insight into the complex inner workings of a rock.

spaceman, you almost owed me a new keyboard ... and a new shirt.

/fortunately, I was drinking seltzer. still not too sure about the keyboard

475 donna quixote  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 12:46:38pm

I really didn't credit Americans that much. If 9% believe in Creationism, 91% do not.
Mary obviously didn't have my mother when she tried that virgin birth line.

476 charles_martel  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:31:35pm

re: #462 Throbert McGee

Ah, yes, I do remember that phrase being bandied about. Thanks. Always good to know which pidgeon-hole I am in.....

477 straitcircle  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:35:44pm

human DNA is 98.4 percent identical to the DNA of chimpanzees --Morris Goodman of Wayne State University in Detroit.

Chimps are human, gene study implies
22:00 19 May 2003
NewScientist.com news service

If human DNA is identical with the great apes, why ignorant people and intelligent people -- which then can be compared? Also answer this, If I empirically see that some people are not humans but act in the manner of barbarians. And That said, then 98% is not human but barbarians which means Chimps are differentiated as well = Some human and some barbarian. So DNA is contradictory. If there is no good creator and a no bad intervener, then how do you explain a barbarian murder killer and a human social worker -- who works for people's benefit? If DNA defines one, as evolutionist's intend, then why the discrepancy? Why evolutionist also stating in academic screeds, the word "suggest?"

That would mean 98% means nothing of significance. In fact, at 89%, Chimps should be running this country and driving cars, making dentist appointments, building cars, etc.. Because I know some people that do not have 98% human normal genes and are barbarians in nature. Evolution logically does not add up.
In addition, It is a myth that creationist's be live the Bible as their only argument. That is a political avenue by evolutionists for escaping the debate. Some people simply do not believe in evolution. They have no idea where they came from and do not want to be associated with chimps, then bats. Evolutionists get caught up in all the lexicography of their trade-field. Looking at all those long complicated spellings, proves that evolution existed, while the simple also say "suggest!"

1. DNA consists of just 4 nucleotides whose names are usually shortened to the letters A,T,C,G. Shuffle these four chemicals one way and you have a man. Shuffle them another way and you have a worm--so there should be no surprise that humans and worms share some genes.

worms and humans share many of the same genes

Rubbish. I did not come from apes, but evolutionary apes will disagree with me and claim I did.

478 Nemesis6  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:50:48pm

Kind of sad that this logic actually thrives in below the bible belt and a few places above. I'll never understand American conservatism. Probably not conservatism in general, either. I think the only reason people get these ideas about "EVILution", etc, is because they know that noone in their immediate presence is gonna laugh at them because their immediate presence is just as stupid as they are. Circlejerking stupidity one might call it.

479 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 1:51:32pm

re: #452 Killian Bundy

Well, I see the after the fact dingers have been busy. Same people every comment but Not the usual suspects (ID crazies) this time.

/birds of a feather gots to stick together

I reckon you have a point. I'm frequently coming in late to do my dings, but not because I don't want people to see them, I just come back to the thread late after a distraction (or sleep, as in this case). I'm not doing it to be petty. I suppose the ID crazies deserve the same benefit of the doubt?

I'm seriously considering not dinging at all, anymore. I figure people know basically where I stand. OTOH, I stand the risk of looking insufferably aloof. Rather the way you look, I think.

480 Sharmuta  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:04:45pm

re: #479 Salem

Stick with dinging. The ratings system was coded for a reason. IMO, when there is nothing left to bitch about, the dings become the new target.

481 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:06:46pm

re: #464 larado

If someone asked me to right a text book on the origins of man,,,,well it is very simple.We have no idea

LOL! Too bad the rotating titles were dropped.

482 mossley  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:22:00pm

re: #478 Nemesis6

Kind of sad that this logic actually thrives in below the bible belt and a few places above. I'll never understand American conservatism. Probably not conservatism in general, either. I think the only reason people get these ideas about "EVILution", etc, is because they know that noone in their immediate presence is gonna laugh at them because their immediate presence is just as stupid as they are. Circlejerking stupidity one might call it.

Before making such lump judgments, consider that this somewhat conservative site is leading the way in exposing the DI and its fraud. And, with a few exceptions, the somewhat conservative members of this site support this exposure.

483 Yashmak  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:37:00pm

re: #482 Mossberg

Before making such lump judgments, consider that this somewhat conservative site is leading the way in exposing the DI and its fraud. And, with a few exceptions, the somewhat conservative members of this site support this exposure.

Aye to that. With the exception of 1 or 2 issues, I'm about as conservative as they come, and I strongly approve of exposing ID for what it is, and for keeping creationism in all its forms out of the science classroom.

re #477 straightcircle

Rubbish. I did not come from apes, but evolutionary apes will disagree with me and claim I did.

You are correct sir. You did not come from apes. You came from humans. But eons ago, your ancestors did. If that makes me an 'evolutionary ape' as you put it, them I'm a perfect example of one of those chimps driving a car, making dentist appointments, and holding a college degree.

Some people simply do not believe in evolution. They have no idea where they came from and do not want to be associated with chimps, then bats.

At one point in time, people didn't believe the earth was round either. In fact, there are still some who insist it's flat. That they believe in a flat earth has, to this day, utterly failed to make the world flat, or their views any less ignorant of reality.

484 Charles  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:49:20pm

re: #481 Salem

LOL! Too bad the rotating titles were dropped.

They weren't discontinued, just moved. They now show up above the Lizard Lounge logo at the top of the right sidebar.

485 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:51:29pm

re: #334 jeremy1013

He knows better whose knowledge is deduced from higher causes, for his knowledge is from prior premisses when it derives from causes themselves uncaused.

Where demonstration is possible, one who can give no account which includes the cause has no scientific knowledge.

-Aristotle

Hmmm ...

Registered since: Feb 3, 2007 at 3:08 pm

No. of comments posted: 28

Ah.

“He who hath many friends hath none.”

"A friend to all is a friend to none.”

-- Aristotle.

}:)     [Your turn!]

486 Salem  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 2:53:30pm

re: #484 Charles

They weren't discontinued, just moved. They now show up above the Lizard Lounge logo at the top of the right sidebar.

Oh, right on.

487 Nemesis6  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 3:44:46pm

re: #482 mossley

I don't think that holds up. Charles himself distances himself from any statements about LGF being conservative. Through all this time, the only thing I've seen LGF be "conservative" about is stuff like foreign policy, and being conservative about that to some degree just makes sense. I really don't think you can call stuff like exposing Islam, etc, "conservative" or right wing anymore.

488 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 4:08:15pm

Re: this ...

What Monty Python didn't tell you was that the scene is taken from an actual instance of an ID professor trying to get tenure at a State University here in the States.

I've never seen such a large cowflop hit the bullshit-ometer before ...

}:)     [That thing was huge!]

489 straitcircle  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 5:29:46pm

re: #483 Yashmak

At one point in time, people didn't believe the earth was round either. In fact, there are still some who insist it's flat. That they believe in a flat earth has, to this day, utterly failed to make the world flat, or their views any less ignorant of reality.

Actually, and I do agree, the stipulation was that profoundly, the larger proportion in history and at the academic levels, ( western civ. academia flourishing beginning about 150 BCE) vociferously intended that the earth was flat. Only a lesser proportion intended because of eclipses, where they could see the outline of earth on the moon, which was not a strait line, contended the majority view.

Today, at least in academia, which is the comparison here, 'Evolution' is vociferously intended and it the majority. I'm happy to be in the minority.

I understand that to be in the 'Evolution' crowd, one gets friends. It is a profoundly leftist view -- i.e. the collective over the individual. In this case, it is the collective agreement that functions as group-binding (bonding). This is not to say that is a bad thing.

490 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:02:19pm

re: #439 ASU86PE

Punish Christianity and criminals will be all you see.

I'm glad we agree.

}:)     [What do you mean don't feed the trolls?]

491 jaunte  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:08:59pm

re: #490 Kulhwch

What do you mean don't feed the trolls?

(Sshh. We're trying to see if they'll eventually eat citrate.)

492 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:12:26pm

re: #475 donna quixote

I really didn't credit Americans that much. If 9% believe in Creationism, 91% do not.
Mary obviously didn't have my mother when she tried that virgin birth line.

She probably couldn't pronounce parthenogenesis ...

}:)     [Or worse, parthenogenesis in Aramaic ... ]

493 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:15:23pm

re: #478 Nemesis6

Circlejerking stupidity one might call it.

Arrrgghhh.  Stop it!

}:)     [Now how do I get that image out of my head!?  Ick ... ]

494 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:21:33pm
re: #491 jaunte
re: #490 Kulhwch

What do you mean don't feed the trolls?

(Sshh. We're trying to see if they'll eventually eat citrate.)

Ahhh ... okay.

But now I'm confused.  Weren't we supposed to go to a more advanced test animal on this part of the experiment?

}:)     [Oh, they're cheaper ... I gotcha.]

495 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 6:23:22pm
re: #492 Kulhwch
re: #475 donna quixote

I really didn't credit Americans that much. If 9% believe in Creationism, 91% do not.
Mary obviously didn't have my mother when she tried that virgin birth line.

She probably couldn't pronounce parthenogenesis ...

}:)     [Or worse, parthenogenesis in Aramaic ... ]

}:B     [Or double worse, parthenogenesis in Yiddish ... oy ... ]

496 Lynn B.  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:40:43pm

re: #489 straitcircle

Hint: using multisyllabic words, even appropriately (try it sometime), does not make you look smart.

Especially when you can't spell the the monosyllabic ones correctly.

/is this citrate enough?

497 Claire  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 7:58:30pm

re: #477 straitcircle

What do you have against apes? Seriously, why the phobia? In what ways do you think it diminishes the wonderfulness of you to have evolved over 10's of millions of years from a common ancestor? Hey, you can pick your friends, but not your relatives, so why does this worry you so much?

498 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:06:18pm

re: #458 jpkoch

"So I gather you're not a big fan of the Bill of Rights, especially that 1st Amendment thingie, ayy? The tyranny of the majority vs. the guaranteed rights of the minority must not be a central concern of yours"

The Bill of Rights are target at Congress ("Congress shall make no...."), and not the local communities and states. In a Federalist Democracy, the states can pretty much do as they please as long as they do not violate the Constitution. The 1st Amendment prohibitions concerning religion were on Congress. Remember, when the Constitution was ratified, 2 states had state religions. The "tyranny of the majority" isn't exactly a tyranny, as the voters still have recourse to the law (ie elections), and recourse to leave a state or locale anytime they wish.

This arrangement may not be "just" for many, but it did take into account that at some time the "majority" must be able to govern. The Founders wished to put 99% of the governance at the lowest levels (ie state laws and not federal laws). Humans are not perfect. Many will make "unjust" or silly laws. The worst thing that could happen is to "federalize" this silliness or unjust tendency -which is what many judges have done.

Yeah...you don't like our discriminatory laws? Well, move on down the road...somehow, that just doesn't seem like America, the land where everybody should be free of such crap. Under what you recommend, we would still have poll taxes and Jim Crow in the Deep South. It took federal intervention to end it.

499 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:08:32pm

re: #461 jpkoch

Essentially, that's what we had until the 1950s. And I don't remember any revolutionary actions coming out of the schools. I do remember reading about private Lutheran schools being ordered not to teach German in their schools (in those days the Lutheran Liturgy was entirely in Hoch Deutsch). During Wilson's assault on civil liberties during The Great War, even the SCOTUS agreed he could do this during times of war. If anything, we've seen the opposite of what you describe. In the past there were schools that were ghetto schools, in that they reflected the local ethnic flavor of their community. But those incitations died out pretty quickly when the children found they couldn't function in society. In any event, schooling has always been local. The end results of poor schooling were obvious. If a town or locale doesn't have a problem with turning out ignorant students, that's their problem and not Washington's. If the schools are led by dangerous radicals, the Feds could close them down for in a heart beat (something in our politically correct world that is rare).

Today's assault on the majority has come from above and not below. The radical race conscious movements you describe are funded by national race organizations (Arab, Hispanic, etc...). They are also in league with the national teaching establishments and unions. This multi-culti assault is the opposite of what I described.

It sounds like you wanna repeal Brown vs. Board of Education, and return to separate and unequal. No WAY this nation's backtracking down that road.

500 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:18:27pm

re: #469 littleO

re#430 Thanos:
This comparative religion BS is part of the whiny mouthed, watered down BS, that have been fostered upon us by the ' Liberalism ' that came from President Johnsons' ' Great society', Mcgovern lead Socialist, who plunged us for a generation into currancy devalueation and government subsidy, and the great experiment of Vatican ii, which proceded upon an unsuspecting laity, not through a proper council vote, but, though the skullduggery of reformers and later through the good, but, misguided intentions of Pope Paul vi.

But, I digress. As far as I'm concerned, the proposition for ID came from scientist who felt the underpinnings of 'evolutioary theory' was becoming untenable. ( I' ve read the grappling defenses of evolution and find it inconclusive ).

501 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:25:17pm

re: #469 littleO

Lemme try this again...

re#430 Thanos:
This comparative religion BS is part of the whiny mouthed, watered down BS, that have been fostered upon us by the ' Liberalism ' that came from President Johnsons' ' Great society', Mcgovern lead Socialist, who plunged us for a generation into currancy devalueation and government subsidy, and the great experiment of Vatican ii, which proceded upon an unsuspecting laity, not through a proper council vote, but, though the skullduggery of reformers and later through the good, but, misguided intentions of Pope Paul vi. But, I digress. As far as I'm concerned, the proposition for ID came from scientist who felt the underpinnings of 'evolutioary theory' was becoming untenable. ( I' ve read the grappling defenses of evolution and find it inconclusive ). I am perfectly willing to concede that ' Creationist " highjacked the term ID nefariously. But, that does not propel the genesis for the unrelenting post against the ideas and principles of christianity into validity.

Perhaps you lack the logical prerequisites to comprehend why the empirical evidence is so compelling.

The defense offered for those who went along with totalitarianism,and authoritarian judgements, has always been that I obeyed the law,or, I was a good citizen.
Bringing this into propective. I don't want the Federal government to cast their rules and regulation for a secular state upon me. I'm not asking for comparative religion classes, which are stupid. I want the Iman to argue against the Catholic apoligist.Those against the notions of Protestantism, Judahism and the eastern mystics. All of this arguement can be found in books and in real people who our orators on these subjects and programs could easily be established in this computer, digital, age where this type of education could be broght into classrooms all across the country at a reasonable expense.
Hey, I've blathered too long. Have a great day!

Soooo...you wanna sit public high school kids in front of TV sets while on them different religious spokesmen debate their theologies...and where do the kids get the tools with which to make credible analyses of the various and sundry points under contention?

It simply amazes me that so many pious folks wanna shoehorn religion into public schools any way they can manage it, while so few rational people are pushing for logic to be a mandatory course, to give kids the tools they need to reasonably evaluate all their incoming info.

502 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:29:37pm

re: #417 Josephine

re: #275 Moe Katz

Well, here I am, early in the morning, posting on a dead thread.

I find it odd that someone accused Charles of creating a wedge.

Somehow this hasn't been understood. I'm not accusing Charles of creating a wedge with ulterior motives, I'm warning of the danger of inadvertently splitting his own constituency with a potential wedge issue. Surely this was clear in my two posts....

Charles is going to post what he wants about the anti-idiotarian issues that he feels matters, and could not give a tinker's damn about wedges between idiotarians and anti-idiotarians on any particular issue. Some idiotarioans will leave, voluntarily or otherwise; others will learn, and lose their idiotarian status on the issue, as has happened on this issue with quite a few people. It was that way with the eurofascist-philes, too.

503 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:35:06pm

re: #477 straitcircle

human DNA is 98.4 percent identical to the DNA of chimpanzees --Morris Goodman of Wayne State University in Detroit.

Chimps are human, gene study implies
22:00 19 May 2003
NewScientist.com news service

If human DNA is identical with the great apes, why ignorant people and intelligent people -- which then can be compared? Also answer this, If I empirically see that some people are not humans but act in the manner of barbarians. And That said, then 98% is not human but barbarians which means Chimps are differentiated as well = Some human and some barbarian. So DNA is contradictory. If there is no good creator and a no bad intervener, then how do you explain a barbarian murder killer and a human social worker -- who works for people's benefit? If DNA defines one, as evolutionist's intend, then why the discrepancy? Why evolutionist also stating in academic screeds, the word "suggest?"

That would mean 98% means nothing of significance. In fact, at 89%, Chimps should be running this country and driving cars, making dentist appointments, building cars, etc.. Because I know some people that do not have 98% human normal genes and are barbarians in nature. Evolution logically does not add up.
In addition, It is a myth that creationist's be live the Bible as their only argument. That is a political avenue by evolutionists for escaping the debate. Some people simply do not believe in evolution. They have no idea where they came from and do not want to be associated with chimps, then bats. Evolutionists get caught up in all the lexicography of their trade-field. Looking at all those long complicated spellings, proves that evolution existed, while the simple also say "suggest!"

1. DNA consists of just 4 nucleotides whose names are usually shortened to the letters A,T,C,G. Shuffle these four chemicals one way and you have a man. Shuffle them another way and you have a worm--so there should be no surprise that humans and worms share some genes.

worms and humans share many of the same genes

Rubbish. I did not come from apes, but evolutionary apes will disagree with me and claim I did.

I think that humans and chimpanzees evolutionarily diverged from a common ancestor a few million years ago, and the artifactual retroviral DNA sequence evidence amply demonstrates this. If someone wants to prove me wrong, all they have to do is impregnate a chimpanzee, and have it give birth to a fertile hybrid (I don't think it's genetically possible).

504 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:41:10pm

re: #489 straitcircle

Actually, and I do agree, the stipulation was that profoundly, the larger proportion in history and at the academic levels, ( western civ. academia flourishing beginning about 150 BCE) vociferously intended that the earth was flat. Only a lesser proportion intended because of eclipses, where they could see the outline of earth on the moon, which was not a strait line, contended the majority view.

Today, at least in academia, which is the comparison here, 'Evolution' is vociferously intended and it the majority. I'm happy to be in the minority.

I understand that to be in the 'Evolution' crowd, one gets friends. It is a profoundly leftist view -- i.e. the collective over the individual. In this case, it is the collective agreement that functions as group-binding (bonding). This is not to say that is a bad thing.

It's the fraternity of those people who cleave to empirical evidence rather than to ancient parables. You know; the logical, rational, reasonable, coherent, and cogent people.

505 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:42:42pm

re: #478 Nemesis6

Circlejerking stupidity one might call it.

Arrrgghhh. Stop it!

}:) [Now how do I get that image out of my head!? Ick ... ]

By means of a daisy chain of reasoning?

506 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 8:59:47pm

re: #496 Lynn B.

/is this citrate enough?

What was the previous record?

}:)     [And what'd they eat before?  Nylon?]

507 Kulhwch  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:05:11pm
re: #505 Salamantis
re: #478 Nemesis6

Circlejerking stupidity one might call it.

Arrrgghhh. Stop it!

}:) [Now how do I get that image out of my head!? Ick ... ]

By means of a daisy chain of reasoning?

Okay, now we're talking.

}:)     [Sounds nicer too.]

508 Salamantis  Thu, Aug 7, 2008 9:33:48pm

re: #506 Kulhwch

What was the previous record?

}:)     [And what'd they eat before?  Nylon?]

That's a kewl link; you need to stick it in the spinoffs!

509 Yashmak  Fri, Aug 8, 2008 7:27:43am
I understand that to be in the 'Evolution' crowd, one gets friends. It is a profoundly leftist view -- i.e. the collective over the individual.

- straightcircle

Uh, are you on meds or something? My trust in something supported by empirical evidence is simply a way to 'get friends'? How insulting.

I'm sure the reason people started believing in a spherical earth was to 'get friends' as well. Yeah right, that's the ticket. According to your bizaare logic, those folks who believed the world spherical must be Commies who need friends! I get it now!

Incredible.

510 littleO  Fri, Aug 8, 2008 9:32:50am

re #501 salamantis
Maybe you don't get it
. Many, probably most, do not see the world as you do. They see themselves aloof from the incredible violence that is nature. Whereas you set in the woods and imagine yourself at peace in your natural environment.But, even you can admit that if you sit long enough that same natural environmental beauty would devour you.
People need to feel included. Everyone has witnessed peer pressure. Nearly all have a natural affinity to accept authority and the precepts handed down from those deemed more wise. In the belief that our interest are the same. Our interest will merge for the betterment of our society. This has been shown to hold up even when the treads of society are becoming frayed and legislative representation is outweighed by the judiciary branch's oversight.
I understand how you feel court rulings in your favor are not alarming.I understand that those who are intellectually blessed feel more at home with those whom they have equal peerage. Everyone loves those who love them, but, what have you gained.
If I say that I favor the states have rights superceding federally mandated judicial rulings, you should agree with me without conditions. If I suggest that the rulings outlawing religious reference from any and all public functions, or platform, is a misinterpretation of the separatist clause of the constitution, you should agree with me.
If I suggest that ELECTIVE courses on what the religions of the world actually say, you should not be at odds with that. I am proposing intellectual pursuit of a subject that has occupied some of the finest minds of history. The fact that many intellectuals today belittle and wish to bannish religion from all public life show extreme narrowness of mind, even an authoritarian nature.

Would you be more open to this idea if they used a big screen t.v. with a good sound system.

511 kulhwch  Fri, Aug 8, 2008 11:01:49am

re: #508 Salamantis

That's a kewl link; you need to stick it in the spinoffs!

Thanks, I just did that. That should put a twist in a few knickers.

}:)     [So-to-speak.]

512 Kulhwch  Fri, Aug 8, 2008 1:08:22pm

re: #510 littleO

re #501 salamantis
Maybe you don't get it

Or maybe you don't.  Of the two, I know who I think is more astute.

. Many, probably most, do not see the world as you do.

Just reaching here, aren't you?

They see themselves aloof from the incredible violence that is nature.

Considering that they are nature's creatures, that would be their cluelessness, wouldn't it?

Whereas you set in the woods and imagine yourself at peace in your natural environment.

I love when fundamentalists don't like/trust nature.  I hate the crowds at Yosemite.  Please, if you don't like it, go to a mall and let the rest of us who are part of the natural world frolic in our heritage.

But, even you can admit that if you sit long enough that same natural environmental beauty would devour you.

Death IS natural, and we'll all go there.  I happen to think I'm safer in the wilderness than crossing a street.  They aren't mysterious dangers, they're understood and taken into account.  And I have yet to see a terrorist blow up a redwood grove.

People need to feel included.

Then if they're not, why don't they do something about it?

Everyone has witnessed peer pressure.

<laughing out loud!>  Are you really going to sit there and suggest that the only reason some people like nature is to fit in with the kewl crowd?

Nearly all have a natural affinity to accept authority and the precepts handed down from those deemed more wise.

Question authority; it's your right.  Both by birth if you were born in this country, and by historical practice.  Blind acceptance is just that ... blind.

In the belief that our interest are the same. Our interest will merge for the betterment of our society.

Are you saying that if we all believe in lockstep then everyone will get along and there won't be the nastiness we have now?  Uber alles indeed ...

This has been shown to hold up even when the treads of society are becoming frayed and legislative representation is outweighed by the judiciary branch's oversight.

To quote Dennis Miller: WTF are you talking about?

I understand how you feel court rulings in your favor are not alarming.

Any reason he should feel otherwise?

I understand that those who are intellectually blessed feel more at home with those whom they have equal peerage.

Wow.  A reverse elitist!

Everyone loves those who love them, but, what have you gained. If I say that I favor the states have rights superceding federally mandated judicial rulings, you should agree with me without conditions.

Why?

If I suggest that the rulings outlawing religious reference from any and all public functions, or platform, is a misinterpretation of the separatist clause of the constitution, you should agree with me.

Why?

If I suggest that ELECTIVE courses on what the religions of the world actually say, you should not be at odds with that.

Why not?

I am proposing intellectual pursuit of a subject that has occupied some of the finest minds of history.

So it hasn't been figured out by now?

The fact that many intellectuals today belittle and wish to bannish religion from all public life show extreme narrowness of mind, even an authoritarian nature.

Unlike your 'force my faith on everyone' totalitarianism?

Would you be more open to this idea if they used a big screen t.v. with a good sound system.

Not many of those in the woods.  Sorry to mess up your one overt attempt to be insulting.

}:)     [W00t.]

513 Salamantis  Fri, Aug 8, 2008 6:07:44pm

re: #510 littleO

re #501 salamantis
Maybe you don't get it
. Many, probably most, do not see the world as you do. They see themselves aloof from the incredible violence that is nature. Whereas you set in the woods and imagine yourself at peace in your natural environment.But, even you can admit that if you sit long enough that same natural environmental beauty would devour you.
People need to feel included. Everyone has witnessed peer pressure. Nearly all have a natural affinity to accept authority and the precepts handed down from those deemed more wise. In the belief that our interest are the same. Our interest will merge for the betterment of our society. This has been shown to hold up even when the treads of society are becoming frayed and legislative representation is outweighed by the judiciary branch's oversight.

Let me endeavor to state this plainly enough and in widely enough known words that the message might penetrate your brow ridges and lodge in your brain:

Evolutionary theory is NOT a popularity contest! The truth of a propostion and its popularity are not causally linked. It has to do with the empirical evodence for or against a contention. And ALL of the empirical evidence CORROBORATES evolutionary theory, and NONE of that evidence CONTRADICTS it.

I understand how you feel court rulings in your favor are not alarming.I understand that those who are intellectually blessed feel more at home with those whom they have equal peerage. Everyone loves those who love them, but, what have you gained.
If I say that I favor the states have rights superceding federally mandated judicial rulings, you should agree with me without conditions. If I suggest that the rulings outlawing religious reference from any and all public functions, or platform, is a misinterpretation of the separatist clause of the constitution, you should agree with me.

I should agree with something that would trash the US Constitution's Bill of Rights and allow a racial, sexual and religious prejudice patchwork of this country? FUCK, NO! Get it through your concrete block head: The Confederacy LOST the Civil War! And it DESERVED to!

If I suggest that ELECTIVE courses on what the religions of the world actually say, you should not be at odds with that. I am proposing intellectual pursuit of a subject that has occupied some of the finest minds of history. The fact that many intellectuals today belittle and wish to bannish religion from all public life show extreme narrowness of mind, even an authoritarian nature.

Would you be more open to this idea if they used a big screen t.v. with a good sound system.

I would not be in favor of religiously Oprah-izing our classrooms without prior oversight, meaning that each segment would have to be previewed and vetted for lies and misrepresentations. And who would be qualified to perform such a service? When two sides each proclaim that all who embrace the other side are doomed to eternal torment, who can authoritatively judge between them? You do not seem to realize, or seem to care, what kind of Pandora's box you are opening when you petition to morph our public high school classes into religious battlegrounds. Once again, religion should remain in the homes and churches and sectarian private schools. It has about as much business being forced into the schools as does Richard Dawkins' presence being required in church pulpits.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

Free shipping on all new textbooks.  Plus, save up to 30%.
Tikatok Gift Cards - Capture your child's imagination . . . in a book!
More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Time to put on the big boy pants.


50% off Columbia DVD Sale
Limited Time Offer:  FREE $10 Online Gift Certificate with $100 Gift Card Purchase!