LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

How to Wear Down a Bear

Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 9:05:37 am PDT

The cease-fire agreement with Georgia is holding for now, but the Russian military is in no hurry to leave. Stuart Koehl has an interesting piece on possible military options for Georgia: The Pain Game.

This invasion has probably eaten deeply into Russian operations and maintenance funding, to say nothing of its war reserve stockpiles of ordnance and equipment. Russia must have bet on a short and fairly bloodless war, because it cannot afford—militarily or politically—a protracted slog. Not only doesn’t it have the equipment to do so, but it doesn’t have enough highly trained troops to sustain heavy casualties. The Russian military consists of a small, diamond-hard point on the end of a wooden stick. If the point shatters or wears down, you are left fighting the stick. (It should be noted that Ralph Peters, writing in the New York Post, has been scathing in his assessment of the Russian army’s performance in Georgia, so by Western standards even the best of the Russian army would be considered rather mediocre).

The question is how to wear it down.

Advertisement

323 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Adrenalyn  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:07:36am

make him hibernate

2 Adrenalyn  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:07:50am

winter is coming and the bear needs his rest

3 pawel  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:08:05am

Somebody's shooting blanks

4 Adrenalyn  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:08:37am

donate some capture Iranian IEDs to the Georgian rsistance
which is all their army is now...

5 rawmuse  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:08:50am

I read an article that a Russian pilot had been shot down, he was 52. From his hospital bed in Tbilisi, he said all the Russian pilots are about that age. They are flying planes manufactured in the early '80s.

6 fishbowl  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:09:06am

Charles,

You got " target="_blank"> code showing up in the post. Posting error or another nefarious Russian plot?
;)

Fishbowl

7 Adrenalyn  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:09:12am

let the Russians see how well their designs (the Iranian IEDs) work in the field

8 debutaunt  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:09:40am

Fox reporter says that Russia is not retreating.

9 theheat  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:09:41am

Whenever people speak in absolutes, they're usually dead wrong. I wouldn't underestimate Russian forces, nor do I feel any better because Stuart Koehl chooses to do so.

10 Sharmuta  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:10:38am

It's occurred to me that if anyone wanted to take a potshot at Russia right now, Russia would be hard up for anyone coming to their defense. Brilliant strategy there, putin.

11 rawmuse  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:10:46am

Here is my previously mentioned article.

12 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:13:17am

The Georgians should probably take a look back at who's twisted the bear's nads in the past, and take lessons from them.  Afganistan is a very good textbook to read in that light.

}:P     [I never thought I'd be saying "Damn the Russians" in this day and age ... ]

13 RememberSekhmet?  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:13:31am

re: #2 Adrenalyn

winter is coming and the bear needs his rest

Poetic justice, considering Russia's way of wearing down both Napoleon and Hitler.

14 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:13:38am

re: #8 debutaunt

Fox reporter says that Russia is not retreating.


We should be giving the Georgians a few toys to encourage movement in the right direction.

15 JammieWearingFool  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:13:48am

Don't worry. Obambi will give the Soviets Russians all the time they need to regroup.

16 akak  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:14:05am

Send in the drones!

17 BlueCanuck  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:14:20am

We might be left fighting the stick after the diamond where's down. But quantity has a quality all it's own. Just ask the Germans in Stalingrad or Leningrad.

18 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:14:32am

re: #13 RememberSekhmet?

Poetic justice, considering Russia's way of wearing down both Napoleon and Hitler.

They want to be in Georgian when winter came, then be able the blame the weather for not pulling out.

19 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:15:15am

re: #10 Sharmuta

It's occurred to me that if anyone wanted to take a potshot at Russia right now, Russia would be hard up for anyone coming to their defense. Brilliant strategy there, putin.

"Yoo hoo, China, look ... you can see Russia's knickers, they're bent over Georgia so far ... "

}:/     [Tough call on our part though: what to do if China DID take Russia ... ]

20 rwmofo  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:16:25am

I never tried to wear down a bear, but I'm positve that I'll never poke a leopard with a stick.

21 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:16:33am

re: #11 rawmuse

Here is my previously mentioned article.

Excellent.
Don't you love the scent of fresh baked thread in the morning?

22 jaunte  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:16:50am

re: #19 Kulhwch

You can just imagine the sprouting of "Free Siberia" bumper-stickers on the left coast.

23 Sharmuta  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:17:59am

re: #19 Kulhwch

Funny- China was exactly what I was thinking. Some of us were discussing it in the lounge last night. With Russia having pissed off any potential allies, and China having the economy it has- it's hard for me to imagine China being taken to task. It would be easier to stand up to the bear rather than the dragon.

24 Dizzy26  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:18:00am

It would seem that the bear has little (or no )ability, to manufacture any replacement 'ARMS' to continue in the event of big losses.

Perhaps a few in place 'moles' could raid factories and REALLY destroy their response!

25 itellu3times  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:19:13am

re: #8 debutaunt

Fox reporter says that Russia is not retreating.

And that's how you wear down the bear - don't let them retreat, cut them off.

26 Shane  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:19:46am

Easy and cheap would be to hire Blackwater. They are an independent firm with no boarders and they are battle hardened. They will aquire the weapons they need and they will clean up the Russian irregulars. They aren't paid by the United States but Georgia, so they are Georgian fighters by definition.

27 Killgore Trout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:22:04am

re: #11 rawmuse

Interesting. I'd been wondering about their air capabilities.

28 christheprofessor  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:22:09am

re: #12 Kulhwch

twisted the bear's nads

I'll nominate that for a rotating title...

29 Boxy_brown  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:22:25am

In Soviet Georgia, bear wears down you...
-Yakov Smirnov, military historian.

30 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:22:26am

re: #9 theheat

Whenever people speak in absolutes, they're usually dead wrong. I wouldn't underestimate Russian forces, nor do I feel any better because Stuart Koehl chooses to do so.

You have a definite point, and I think it's one to keep in mind.

I hope you are wrong, because nothing would please me more than to watch the Russians fall apart.

31 jorline  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:23:16am

re: #2 Adrenalyn

winter is coming and the bear needs his rest

Ahhh...grasshopper. No place to sleep when it's 75 degrees all winter.

You forgot global warming...need other plan.

32 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:23:26am

No joy at all - read this about the 'peace agreement' ...

Oh, and here' an instructive little snippet from that report:

"Mr Saakashvili was humiliated further when the final text of the agreement, delivered personally by Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, removed a reference to Russian recognition of Georgia’s territorial integrity. It referred only to independence and sovereignty," ...

I only hope that behind the scenes the G7 and NATO are doing their utmost to expel Russia from their meetings and deliberations - foreer, if encessary!

33 lawhawk  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:24:23am

The Russians have numbers on their side, but as the article suggests, the Russians have a supply and personnel issue. We've seen numerous examples where the Russians simply don't have disciplined troops, but rather engage in looting and thuggery. We've seen that the Georgians, even though outnumbered and lacking air superiority still managed to take out a number of Russian aircraft - and apparently the Russians don't even have countermeasures for their own equipment.

Meanwhile, Peters has still more today:

The media eagerly repeat Putin's claim that the situation in Georgia simply mirrors that in Kosovo. Yet, Kosovo's freedom-fighters were home-grown, while the KGB and its successor, the FSB, created, funded and protected the thugs recruited for secessionist movements in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

If Moscow insists so indignantly that minorities have a right to secede, why doesn't the same rule apply to Chechnya? Or to Daghestan and other Russian internal regions chafing under Moscow's oppression? Why haven't the media noticed that moral equivalence?

It's been a week of bullets in Georgia and blather in the West. Why was our press so outraged over the mistreatment of a dozen prisoners in Abu Ghraib but indifferent to the massive suffering of the Georgian people - who weren't just photographed in embarrassing positions, but murdered, raped, tortured and driven from homes that the Russian army and its local henchmen destroyed? Is love of freedom a crime to our media?

Indeed.

34 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:24:27am

re: #5 rawmuse

I read an article that a Russian pilot had been shot down, he was 52. From his hospital bed in Tbilisi, he said all the Russian pilots are about that age. They are flying planes manufactured in the early '80s.

The President of Georgia said yesterday in his presser with Condi that the Russians had had to scoop up retired pilots off the streets of Moscow to put planes over Georgia. A Russian evaluation I came across quoted the various Red Army generals as shaking their heads, absolutely dumbfounded trying to figure out how the heck little Georgia shot down their planes.

And to add one last little kicker, in their haste to destroy all of the Georgian's war making & manufacturing potential they completely destroyed the plant that makes the planes the Red Army flies (SU something.) HAH!

35 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:24:59am

re: #26 Shane

I fear that's not legal.

36 HoosierHoops  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:25:18am

re: #11 rawmuse

Here is my previously mentioned article.

great read..thanks raw

37 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:25:51am

Just so!

A cartoon which doesn't need a caption ...

38 Malthorn  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:25:53am

re: #19 Kulhwch

Nobody wants to fight a cornered bear. Especially not one with nuclear tipped teeth.

39 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:25:56am

re: #22 jaunte

"Let The Gulag Go!"

}:)     [It'd make for some interesting rallies ... ]

40 Ruthless  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:27:20am

The problem we have is that the New Mk. II Cold War that is now being launched is an economic war, not a military confrontation. Ever since Putin came to power, it has been clear that Russia was not going to become a nice democratic place after all.

In 2001, Bush looked into Putin's eyes and "was able to get a sense of his soul." According to a BBC News report from the time of their first meeting, Bush "described Mr. Putin as a straightforward and trustworthy man." Straighforward perhaps if in a deceitful way; trustworthy, I don't think so. Jeesh, Bush came off sounding like the Obamanation, acting as if "talking nice" would solve all the problems in the world. (That meeting took place less than three months before 9/11, so things did change rather abruptly.)

When John McCain looked into those same eyes of the new Russian Czar, he said he saw three things, the letters: K, G and B. Events of the past seven years have put Bush's evaluation into serious doubt, and McCain's assessment seems to be spot on -- former KGB colonel Putin is leading a resurgence of the "bad" old Soviet Union, and the foundation has now been laid for overt adventurism and the projection of power through economic means.

Russia has evolved into what is at heart a criminal society, ruled by a new class of self-proclaimed "Mafiya" consisting of ultra-rich, conspicuously consuming thugs. It is becoming an economic powerhouse but with a large underclass of poor citizens, much like that other vast criminal enterprise, the PRC. Czarist feudalism has reemerged (it was always there), clothed in a new and troubling distortion of capitalism and with a new Czar on the throne in the Kremlin (nevermind that he is no longer President, he has the reins of power and will no doubt keep them as long as he lives).

Comparisons could be made here with the robber baron age of America, when ruthlessness (and mercilessness) ran rampant. The emergence of a rum running smuggler not too far removed from the likes of Al Capone (Joseph Kennedy) as a respectable cornerstone of society and father of a political dynasty tells how far we have come. Today's Russian counterparts to the robber barons are still in full bay like packs of hungry wolves, gobbling up everything they can by whatever means possible. Is there any doubt that at the very top, where Putin occupies the throne, there is much difference from the attitudes and methods of the mafiya?

The Cold War is on again, just like flicking a switch. But is is a new and improved Mk. II Cold War. Power will not be projected through ICBMs and tank divisions -- after all, that didn't work out very well the last time, too much of a Mexican standoff with too many guns on both sides. Now, oil and gas are both the lubricants and the goal of the new expansionist Russia, not to mention the very tools of power. And this time, we are like the guy who came to a gunfight with a knife, or even worse, a water pistol. Who were the smart ones when the Soviets backed down from that failed model of military standoff when they saw it wasn't working? Hmm, food for thought there, and now they're back with a new Mk. II model for which we are almost ludicrously ill prepared.

To quote the Clinton campaign of 1992, "It's the economy, stupid." Yes, stupid, it really is the economy, the WORLD economy (the Clintonestas saw it much too myopically and short term). We may have left the gold standard a long time ago, but we stupidly allowed it to be replaced by a de facto oil standard. And just as the outdated Golden Rule of economics said that those who have the gold, rule, those who have the oil rule today. And those oil empowered rulers are no friends of America.

41 rawmuse  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:27:41am

re: #26 Shane

I hear Eric Prince (founder) speak recently and he said, without equivocation, that he is getting out of the business.

42 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:28:20am

re: #33 lawhawk

He got it in one!

43 jorline  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:28:26am

Just tell everyone in the north it's open season on bears in Georgia....no limits, no license and free airfare.
When they arrive at the airport hand them a ticket to the Georgia across the pond and tell them happy hunting.

44 itellu3times  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:28:38am

re: #41 rawmuse

I hear Eric Prince (founder) speak recently and he said, without equivocation, that he is getting out of the business.

I'm not sure that's the kind of business one can get out of.

45 abolitionist  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:29:33am

re: #34 galloping granny

[snip]
And to add one last little kicker, in their haste to destroy all of the Georgian's war making & manufacturing potential they completely destroyed the plant that makes the planes the Red Army flies (SU something.) HAH!

That's central planning for ya.

46 beldar67  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:29:35am

re: #10 Sharmuta

It's occurred to me that if anyone wanted to take a potshot at Russia right now, Russia would be hard up for anyone coming to their defense. Brilliant strategy there, putin.

An illustrative quote from "Red Dawn":


Jed Eckert: ...Well, who *is* on our side?
Col. Andy Tanner: Six hundred million screaming Chinamen.
Darryl Bates: Last I heard, there were a billion screaming Chinamen.
Col. Andy Tanner: There *were*.
[he throws whiskey on the fire; it ignites violently, suggesting a nuclear explosion]

China and Russia won't go to war, especially over resources. Why risk it when the Chinese can buy all they like. A Russia/Chinese alliance is a more troubling outcome, and not so unthinkable when you consider China will want friends if they ever try to annex Taiwan.

47 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:29:44am

re: #23 Sharmuta

And China could always excuse itself by claiming to come to the aid of Georgia.  It's a win-win scenario for China.

}:)     [The tough choice would be for them to wait for the Olympics to be over, or just suprize Russia, say, next weekend, when the Russians sure wouldn't be expecting it?]

48 Killgore Trout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:29:52am

Koskidz love Russian propaganda....
Pravda editorial GOES OFF on Bush regarding Ossetia/Georgia

Progressive!

49 Shane  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:30:07am

To #17 the Bluecannuck;

Quantity means nothing anymore. It just changes the pay load being brought to the battle field. As far as Leningrad goes, Hitler simply didn't learn the lesson of Thermopolis. Don't fight them, go around them, cut off the food supply. I hope we are smarter than that. We seemed to have learned our lesson if you look at Tora Bora. We had little to gain and only lives to lose fighting the terrorists in their pre-arranged battle ground, so we stopped. Backed up and waited for them to come to us.

The fact is, an army of 10-15 thousand dedicated with the right equipment could go in quickly and kick Russia out of Georgia. But you have a small window of about 3 days before reinforcements are sent. The trick is not to drive them out but to kill all the Russians so they can't regroup. Then the incoming force is a new force so you have to set up for them coming quickly. Over all, it would be best to use Blackwater or another group as arms dealers and funnel them weapons. Second, bring them into NATO. Third, set up the missle shield in as many countries as you can. Fourth, start knocking down satellites at sea(cut off communications). Fifth, make incursions into Russia and take out power lines and gas lines. No people.

Anyway, that would be my plan. And numbers wouldn't matter.

50 rawmuse  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:30:11am

re: #44 itellu3times

I'm not sure that's the kind of business one can get out of.

Somehow, I don't worry about him. He looked very capable of taking care of himself. Steely-eyed, ramrod straight, and confident. I was impressed.

51 christheprofessor  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:30:23am

re: #40 Ruthless

Very nice post...

52 rwmofo  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:31:15am

OT: Pelosi will allow drilling in the OCS, but only if they raise costs and taxes on "Big Oil."

"Her priorities include a repeal of royalty relief for offshore drillers and an end to other tax credits for the biggest oil companies, as well as so-called use it or lose it legislation forcing energy companies to relinquish un-used leases."

Translation: Make "Big Oil" pay!

Oh wait. That will make the price of gas go up as well, right?

"Little Oil" was unavailable for comment.

53 freedomplow  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:31:34am

Roki tunnel mishap.

54 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:31:36am

re: #48 Killgore Trout

I won't read it. The headline disgusts me.

Why they won't even try to get past their BDS I don't know.

55 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:31:44am

re: #48 Killgore Trout

Koskidz love Russian propaganda....
Pravda editorial GOES OFF on Bush regarding Ossetia/Georgia

Progressive!

They really are holding up PRAVDA as something truthful and admirable? Ye gods and little fishes. . . . .

56 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:31:52am
re: #28 christheprofessor
re: #12 Kulhwch

twisted the bear's nads

I'll nominate that for a rotating title...

}:D     [Thanks!]

57 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:33:34am

re: #53 freedomplow

Frequent ones.

58 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:35:43am

re: #38 Malthorn

Nobody wants to fight a cornered bear. Especially not one with nuclear tipped teeth.

True, but China's got nuclear teeth of their own.

}:)     [And, historically, a certain attitude problem ... ]

59 BlueCanuck  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:35:56am

re: #55 galloping granny

They really are holding up PRAVDA as something truthful and admirable? Ye gods and little fishes. . . . .

Well do you expect them to act any differently to that paper?

/pravada means truth. ministry of peace, ministry of love. . . . . . . .

60 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:36:15am

A friend just sent me this - WOAH! This is what you call "Telling it like it is!"

[Link: www.atimes.com...]

61 Airedale  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:37:58am

Just like ....
Sherman through Gerogia,
the Russian army may be "living off the land".

Guess any weapons they find will be needed elswhere to fund the expedition

62 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:38:16am

re: #59 BlueCanuck

Well do you expect them to act any differently to that paper?

/pravada means truth. ministry of peace, ministry of love. . . . . . . .

I just find it almost flabbergasting that the younger generation appears to know literally nothing of the Cold War, Russia, the Soviet Union, Marxism, Communism or even propaganda.

63 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:39:04am

1. Blow the tunnel; I mean wait for drunken fuel truck drivers to have an accident.
2. Sabotage the rail line from Sochi under a cliff; I mean anticipate seismic events.
3. Get Ukraine into Nato and scrub the Black Sea free of the Russian Navy.
4. In 8 weeks the Russian army will be needing evacuation before the Winter.

64 Sharmuta  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:39:04am

re: #46 beldar67

I agree that it's highly unlikely that China will do anything, but on the other hand- why buy it if you can take it. Who would stop them?

65 reno911  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:39:05am

Hitler underestimated the Russians too. The name of the game is Logistics and our Logistics trail is too long.

66 Egfrow  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:39:18am

re: #15 JammieWearingFool

Don't worry. Obambi will give the Soviets Russians all the time they need to regroup.

And money.

67 JHW  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:40:27am

I'd have to check back, but I'm fairly certain at least one of those Russian jets was shot down by a Ukrainian missile.

68 jorline  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:41:27am

re: #60 galloping granny

A friend just sent me this - WOAH! This is what you call "Telling it like it is!"

[Link: www.atimes.com...]

No mincing words here.

I enjoyed the joke at the end.

My favorite European joke is "Heaven is a place where the police are English; the chefs are Italian; the car mechanics are German; the lovers are French and it's all organized by the Swiss. Hell is a place where the police are German; the chefs are English; the car mechanics are French; the lovers are Swiss and it's all organized by the Italians."

69 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:42:59am

re: #65 reno911

Hitler underestimated the Russians too. The name of the game is Logistics and our Logistics trail is too long.

What do you call 5 years in Iraq and Afghanistan? We have airlift and sealift like no one else. We've built our military to have a 12,000 mile loggie tail.

Is it hard? Yes, impossible? Hardly.

We do not let a democratically government, friends and allies go under because it's hard.

70 Killgore Trout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:43:54am

re: #68 jorline

Ha!

71 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:44:01am
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who currently holds the rotating ("revolting" may be a better word, but we are getting ahead of ourselves here) chairmanship of the European Union, effectively signed over Georgia's existence to the Russians by agreeing to the latter's proposal for the continued presence of Russian "peacekeepers" in Georgia. This is the excuse being used by the Russians for their presence in the town of Gori, even as the military has kept Georgia's capital Tbilisi firmly in its sights. More importantly, the accord brokered by the French makes no mention of Georgia's territorial integrity, in effect allowing for a takeover of the breakaway South Ossetia by the Russians, at the very least.

*Sigh*  And I had just developed so much respect for Sarkozy, thinking that at LAST France had a decent intelligent person in charge.

}:)     [Apparently the surrender monkey rides again ... ]

72 itellu3times  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:44:38am

Speaking of:

McCain and Obama 2nite
from SoCal:
The Old Bear versus the Barely There

73 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:45:37am

re: #65 reno911

To a degree... The Russians face a similar problem if we had the nuts to deal with it... Without directly attacking the Russian forces the US could blow apart the five or so mountain roads, collapse a critical tunnel and play "Sherman neckties" with lots of train tracks and leave the Russians without resupply except by air... motorized division suck wind when they've run out of both gas and ammo... don't forget to give the Georgians anti-tank and anti-air weapons and let them go at it... imo the Russians were counting on a quick collapse of the Georgian government/will and that did not happen, now it's very likely the Georgians will counter with turning the whole deal into something the Russians don't want to deal with.

74 winston06  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:46:57am

Now imagine a President NObama in the WH with things like these going on. Scary, eeh?

75 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:47:36am

re: #55 galloping granny

They really are holding up PRAVDA as something truthful and admirable? Ye gods and little fishes. . . . .

Time for new Palmer Raids

76 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:47:44am

re: #74 winston06

Now imagine a President NObama in the WH with things like these going on. Scary, eeh?

He' start his address to the Crisis: "Russian Georgia....."

77 freedomplow  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:48:04am

Looks like goog maps have scrubbed the roads of Georgia from their map section.

78 itellu3times  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:49:30am

re: #63 lifeofthemind

Have to then blow the airfields, or better yet, keep the airfields open and knock down any Russians trying to land - or take off.

OTOH, I wonder if Russia could even maintain an air bridge into Georgia.

79 Airedale  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:50:09am

re: #52 rwmofo

OT: Pelosi will allow drilling in the OCS, but only if they raise costs and taxes on "Big Oil."

"Her priorities include a repeal of royalty relief for offshore drillers and an end to other tax credits for the biggest oil companies, as well as so-called use it or lose it legislation forcing energy companies to relinquish un-used leases."

Translation: Make "Big Oil" pay!

Oh wait. That will make the price of gas go up as well, right?

"Little Oil" was unavailable for comment.


big oil passes the tax $ on to little oil at the pump

80 carray  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:51:21am

Putin's wife has described him as a vampire. He said so. A stake through the heart or a beheading will put an end to him. The question is: what act of the West's will serve as the stake or as the beheading? Will Europe's hatred of America allow her to coddle Putin the same way it has Castro?

81 JHW  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:51:22am

I hope Col. Tom shows up on one of these threads, a field grade officers assessment would be pretty interesting to me.

82 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:51:50am

re: #78 itellu3times

OTOH, I wonder if Russia could even maintain an air bridge into Georgia.

Not if we didn't want it. Russian Air Power hasn't faired well, they've got some good stuff, but the drivers haven't had a lot of training lately.

83 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:51:52am

re: #73 anotherindyfilmguy

That is the plan

84 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:52:15am

re: #79 Airedale

big oil passes the tax $ on to little oil at the pump

I suspect most of the American voting public knows enough about costs and taxes to see right straight through this one. Pelosi might want to rethink that if she wants to remain as Speaker of the House.

85 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:52:40am

re: #82 jcm

Not if we didn't want it. Russian Air Power hasn't faired well, they've got some good stuff, but the drivers haven't had a lot of training lately.

And they just blew up the plane factory!

86 reno911  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:52:48am

re: #69 jcm

It's not hard...it's impossible. Sealift is out because of the Black Sea chokepoint. You gonna airlift everything in? I don't think so.

A commenter up thread has it exactly right, this is an economic war (they all are actually), let's fight it as such. If we started drilling now, the price of oil would collapse and Russia would be out of business.

I do not advocate leaving Georgia in the lurch. But fight this war the way we fought the last one.

CONTAINMENT.

87 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:52:49am

re: #65 reno911

So's theirs. And they have always had trouble with logistics.

88 Sizzlack  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:53:18am

How to wear it down?

Leaves bottles of Stoli in a line (a la Hansel and Gretle) that leads straight off of a cliff (a la Road Runner and Coyote)

89 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:54:32am

re: #84 galloping granny

I suspect most of the American voting public knows enough about costs and taxes to see right straight through this one. Pelosi might want to rethink that if she wants to remain as Speaker of the House.

Waters' let the (D) cat out of the bag while back.

90 drogheda  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:54:37am

Georgians could simply leave a lot of poisoned vodka laying around. Something like ethylene glycol.

91 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:54:52am

re: #75 lifeofthemind

Hell, no!

92 huckfunn  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:55:06am

Rooskies in Georgia? I guess Alabama is next.

93 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:55:44am

re: #77 freedomplow

Looks like goog maps have scrubbed the roads of Georgia from their map section.

No, no no no. I explained this yesterday. Google Maps is serviced by a different database than Google Earth is. Google Earth gives you satellite photos. Google Maps gives you the same mapping data that Tomtom or your GPS unit or the US Post Office or OnStar uses. (I know this because one of my kids used to manage that database for one of the companies that produces it.) Georgia, US, is in the database. There is not much call for directions from Boston to the Republic of Georgia.

94 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:56:23am

re: #81 JHW

I've been wondering what he thought, too. I haven't been over to the Kratskeller over on the Bar, either.

95 wiffersnapper  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:56:30am

And it all happened because the Messiah wanted it to end. ObAmen.

96 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:57:59am

re: #89 jcm

Waters' let the (D) cat out of the bag while back.

Yeah, I heard that as it happened. As far as I am concerned, she should have been impeached right then and there. Nationalizing our oil industry is quite some stretch from the oath she took to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America.

97 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:58:06am

re: #86 reno911

The Turks might support such an action. They are under no illusions as to what the Russians are up to. I don't know if their internal politics will let them, but it would be in their interest to help the Georgians.

98 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:58:16am

re: #34 galloping granny

And to add one last little kicker, in their haste to destroy all of the Georgian's war making & manufacturing potential they completely destroyed the plant that makes the planes the Red Army flies (SU something.) HAH!

Soviet Aircraft production was organized along different lines than the US, being that it was a socialist "planned" economy. Aircraft were designed in "design bureaus" usually named after the chief aviation engineer of that bureau, in the case of the plane in question, the SU-25 ground attack plane code-named "Frogfoot" by NATO, the design bureau of Pavel Sukhoi. Other design bureaus whose names you might be familiar with: Mikoyan and Gurevich aka "MiG" which designed fighters, Tupolev, who designed long range interceptor fighters, bombers (eg. the TU-95 "Bear") and airliners. Ilyushin, bombers and airliners, Antonov, airliners of various sizes and heavy transport planes, Yakovlev, fighters and Beriev who designed seaplanes. Once the design bureau created the design and the Central Planning committees agreed to produce it, manufacture was contracted out to factories across the USSR, not all of which were concentrated in Russia. Antonov transports, for example, were built in the Ukraine. So for example, you could have an aviation factory in Georgia that produced the Su-25 but also assembled aircraft designed by another design bureau.

99 Viking6  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:59:14am

re: #17 BlueCanuck

Counterpoint - Russia in Afghanistan. The battlefield its self has a lot to do with the forces ability to gain and hold ground. Urban v. inhospitable terrain, poor transportation routes for logistics, many checkpoints, etc.

100 Sizzlack  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:59:23am

I have a feeling there are many possibilities out there on how we can wear the bear down.
But if there is one thing that we can all agree on the use of...

It's vodka.

And lots of it.

101 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 9:59:49am

re: #80 carray

Putin's wife has described him as a vampire. He said so. A stake through the heart or a beheading will put an end to him. The question is: what act of the West's will serve as the stake or as the beheading? Will Europe's hatred of America allow her to coddle Putin the same way it has Castro?

So we've totally disbanded the CIA sniper program?

}:P     [Shoot, where's Bob Lee Swagger when you need him?]

102 JHW  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:00:06am

re: #94 Dianna

Yes it would be pretty interesting to get some informed, command grade or slot opinion. This amateur Field Marshall stuff is a bit fun,I've done it myself, but amateur is exactly the right word for it.

103 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:01:17am

re: #68 jorline

All to true

104 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:01:29am

From the water-carriers of dictators & tyrants, al-Guardian, Velcom comrades to zee New Verold Odor:

Six days that broke one country - and reshaped the world order [...]

The American "train and equip" mission for the Georgian military is six years old. It has been destroyed in as many days. And with it, Georgia's Nato ambitions. "There are a few countries that will say 'told you so'" about the need to get Georgia into Nato," said Andrew Wilson, Russia expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations. "But many more will want to walk away from the problem. And for the next few years, Georgia will be far too busy trying to pick itself up."

If Georgia and Nato are the principal casualties of this week's ruthless display of brute power by Vladimir Putin, the consequences are bigger still, the fallout immense, if uncertain. The regional and the global balance of power looks to have tilted, against the west and in favour of the rising or resurgent players of the east.

In a seminal speech in Munich last year, Putin confidently warned the west that he would not tolerate the age of American hyperpower. Seven years in office at the time and at the height of his powers, he delivered his most anti-western tirade.

and(reposted from earlier): US must share power in new world order, says Turkey's controversial president

Zee New Verold Odor is developing that very familiar but putrescent stench.

105 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:01:37am

re: #101 Kulhwch

So we've totally disbanded the CIA sniper program?

}:P     [Shoot, where's Bob Lee Swagger when you need him?]

We put in some law or other that disallows assassinations of foreign heads of state.

106 MandyManners  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:01:39am

re: #93 galloping granny

Why does Google Maps show the roads in Kazakhstan? Uzbekistan? Kyrgyzstan? Turkmenistan?

107 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:02:52am

re: #100 Sizzlack

It couldn't hurt.

108 Sizzlack  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:03:04am

re: #106 MandyManners

Why does Google Maps show the roads in Kazakhstan? Uzbekistan? Kyrgyzstan? Turkmenistan?

There are roads in Kyrgyzstan?

109 sattv4u2  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:03:49am

re: #108 Sizzlack

There are roads in Kyrgyzstan?

They traded their vowels to get some roads

110 Viking6  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:03:57am

re: #99 Viking6

Counterpoint - Russia in Afghanistan. The battlefield its self has a lot to do with the forces ability to gain and hold ground. Urban v. inhospitable terrain, poor transportation routes for logistics, many checkpoints,chokepoints etc.

fixed it

111 freedomplow  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:04:09am

Germany's Schroeder says Georgia sparked fighting Aug 16 2008

BERLIN, Aug 16 (Reuters) - Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder blamed Tbilisi on Saturday for sparking hostilities with Moscow and suggested its breakaway regions could not remain part of Georgia following the violent clashes of the past week.

In an interview with German weekly Der Spiegel, Schroeder also criticised the West for failures in its dealings with Russia and urged Europe to strengthen its ties with Moscow.

Schroeder Defends His New Russian Job Dec 13, 2005

After days of silence former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has fired back at critics demanding from him to give up his new job at a German-Russian pipeline project.

112 yenta-fada  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:04:35am

re: #40 Ruthless

Great post! We are waging economic wars (i.e. resource wars) on many fronts.
One of the early terror trials had the Islamist screaming "The dollar is dead!"
A careful reading of most business sections show expanding problems due to the fall in the housing market and the various derivative products sitting around like land mines. The U.S. needs to get its' debt under control.

113 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:05:33am

re: #106 MandyManners

Why does Google Maps show the roads in Kazakhstan? Uzbekistan? Kyrgyzstan? Turkmenistan?

Because they happen to be in the database. You should find all of the US and Canada, and most of Western Europe. Other places are highly dependent on whether or not they have been processed yet. That happens to great extent by a heirarchy of need, depending on who wants to pay for what. I would suggest that we have or had troops based in the stans, which may be why the roads are labeled in Google Maps.

114 freedomplow  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:05:46am

re: #93 galloping granny

Got it. Thanks.

115 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:05:49am

re: #102 JHW

I've been careful to keep my comments to what I actually know a little about. I'm not military, and I know that my knowledge is really limited.

But the politics of this are pretty obvious, and - unless we literally have allowed our capability to decay to the ridiculous extent others seem to think it has - we have to push back. Russia has to be ejected from Georgia, and humiliated, or we've given the Bear the green light. To say nothing of China's ambitions for Taiwan, and every other regional bully.

116 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:05:55am

re: #109 sattv4u2

They traded their vowels to get some roads

The first time I went to Warsaw, I spent a good amount of time at home trying to pick up enough Polish to get arrested or something.

I was speaking a an English speaking Pole while there and mentioned that playing "Wheel of Fortune" in Poland must be expensive, considering the vowels must cost a fortune.

He didn't think that was too funny.

117 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:06:04am

Uh, the Russian invasion of Georgia was a defeat for the Russians? Not.

This article is both fantasy and beside the point. It only matters that the Russian military is a diamond point on a stick if we call their bluff. That means shattering the diamond, or shattering the stick. We've done neither. So far, Game Russia.

And who's bluffing more at the moment? The U.S. or Russia? If both sides laid down their hands, who would win?

I'm not saying we can't turn this around. I'm just saying we haven't done that yet, and with this lame duck Administration, I see no evidence we'll do it in the near future.

118 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:07:26am

re: #111 freedomplow

Bought and paid for.

119 JHW  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:08:55am

re: #115 Dianna

No disagreement there.

120 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:09:42am

re: #118 Dianna

Bought and paid for.

Looks like Putin learned well the "Oil for Food" lesson that Saddam taught.

121 The Other Les  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:12:08am

re: #11 rawmuse

Here is my previously mentioned article.

They sent a manned aircraft to do a mission that we would now send a drone to do. They are way behind the curve.

122 MandyManners  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:12:39am

re: #113 galloping granny

Armenia? Azerbaijan?

123 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:12:42am

re: #120 FurryOldGuyJeans

He learned it from American lobbyists.

124 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:12:43am

re: #104 aboo-Hoo-Hoo

Good, innit, like ... especially erdogan, Turkey's PM calling for the USA to 'share their power'.
Al those who talk here about how Turkey doens't like russia, and might perhaps fight in Georgia - please do keep in mind that under that president Turkey is on a slow and surreptitious way to a full-fledged Islamic Republic.

It would seem to me that more arm-twisting vis-a-vis the Europeans is needed, not an embrace of Turkey as the NATO standard bearer in Europe ...

125 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:13:24am

Most of the hyperventilating screaming that nobody is on the US side comes either straight out of Moscow, as in the FSB plants here and elsewhere on the web, or through discredited mouthpieces such as the Grauniad. We shall see what happens in Turkey and Germany and France and India. America will make a decision about Iran. China will make decisions about Iran and Russia. Personally I think Putin is in a very bad spot and would have a hard time finding anyone willing to sell him life insurance.

126 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:13:29am

re: #118 Dianna

Not to put too fine a point upon it, but Schroeder's transparently a whore for his Russian masters. If I were German, I'd strip him of his right to be called "Germany's" anything. Does he really speak for Germany and the German people?

127 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:13:39am

re: #123 Dianna

He learned it from American lobbyists.

That too, sad to say.

128 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:14:08am

re: #106 MandyManners

Why does Google Maps show the roads in Kazakhstan? Uzbekistan? Kyrgyzstan? Turkmenistan?

Because, iirc, these are palces where the US Armed Forces have established bases for the invasion of Afghanistan, way back then ...

129 pat  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:14:10am

Too bad the Georgian ground forces , air force and navy were ridiculously bad. They did manage to hit some planes though with SAMS. That was cool.

130 The Other Les  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:14:12am

re: #22 jaunte

You can just imagine the sprouting of "Free Siberia" bumper-stickers on the left coast.

No actually, I can't.

131 larryK999  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:14:51am

I question the basic premise of this story about the quality of Russia's military might. Russia is exporting 7 million barrels per day of oil. Thus, they are generating over $700 million per day. That kind of oil money can build a lot of tanks. I would be more concerned about the ability of the USA to maintain its military capability.

132 The Other Les  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:15:01am

re: #24 Dizzy26

It would seem that the bear has little (or no )ability, to manufacture any replacement 'ARMS' to continue in the event of big losses.

Perhaps a few in place 'moles' could raid factories and REALLY destroy their response!

They used to shoot "wreckers" you know.

133 MandyManners  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:15:10am

MS Maps has them.

134 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:15:29am

Schroeder, Germany's Petain.
Where is his little piano?

135 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:16:20am

re: #111 freedomplow

Germany's Schroeder says Georgia sparked fighting Aug 16 2008

Who pays the piper calls the tune ...
Schroeder gets his income from oil/gas-pipeline deals with Moscow ...

136 The Other Les  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:16:49am

re: #33 lawhawk

Is love of freedom a crime to our media?


Yes, it is.

137 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:16:56am

re: #122 MandyManners

Armenia? Azerbaijan?

Mandy, I told you why some countries are in the database and some are not. There are just two companies in the world that produce this data these days. I am not a principle in either of them so I have no direct explanation for why Armenia might be in the database while Georgia is not, other than someone at some point collected the data for Armenia, processed it and included it and this has not yet been done for Georgia.

There is nothing at all nefarious going on. Google Earth has clear, detailed satellite photos of Georgia. That Google Maps does not simply says that the data has not been translated from photo to database.

138 whatdafuq  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:16:59am

re: #55 galloping granny

But of course. "Pravda" means "truth".

139 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:17:28am

re: #112 yenta-fada

Great post! We are waging economic wars (i.e. resource wars) on many fronts.
One of the early terror trials had the Islamist screaming "The dollar is dead!"
A careful reading of most business sections show expanding problems due to the fall in the housing market and the various derivative products sitting around like land mines. The U.S. needs to get its' debt under control.

What is most imperative for the US at this point is increasing our energy independence by any means necessary. The next president (dear Lord, please let it be McCain) needs to realize this is not just an economic but also a national security goal. In the 1990's our business elites swallowed this fuzzy-wuzzy Fukuyama end-of-history I'd like to buy the world a Coke globaloney that has crippled our abilities in many areas by continuing our dependence on foreign energy supplies and outsourcing critical industries. We need to revive a sense of economic patriotism in our nation's corporate boardrooms. The only Presidential candidate that had his finger on the pulse of this issue was Duncan Hunter. He predicted everything that we are experiencing right now with the Russkies and the Chicoms. But too many Republicans had Chris Matthews like tingles up their legs for Giuliani, Fred "Droopy Dawg" Thompson, Mitt Headroom, and the whacky Doctor Paul. I am glad we ended up with McCain as the nominee rather than any of the previously named because as an former military man he will be more likely to listen to the advice of his VietNam era comrade in arms.

140 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:17:54am
141 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:18:28am

Hmmmm.

Bush warns Russia over disputed Georgian provinces
[link provided in spin-off links]
CRAWFORD, Texas - President George W. Bush sent a stern warning to Russia on Saturday that it cannot lay claim to two breakaway provinces in neighboring Georgia, a U.S. ally, and said there was no room for debate on that point.

Searching for signs of progress, Bush told reporters at his Texas ranch that Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's signing Saturday of a cease-fire plan was an important development - "a hopeful step."

"Now, Russia needs to honor that agreement and withdraw its forces and, of course, end military operations" from Georgia, a small former Soviet state on Russia's southwest border.

The Russian foreign minister said Thursday that Georgia could "forget about" getting back the two separatist regions, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Medvedev also met with their leaders in Kremlin this past week, raising the prospect that Moscow could absorb the regions even though the territory is internationally recognized as being within Georgia's borders.

The U.S. says this is a monumental sticking point in resolving the more than weeklong conflict.

"A major issue is Russia's contention that the regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia may not be a part of Georgia's future," Bush said, standing alongside Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. "These regions are a part of Georgia and the international community has repeatedly made clear that they will remain so."

142 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:18:31am

The Georgians got tired of Russian proxies murdering Georgian cops. The Russians have been provoking the Georgians for years. If it wasn't this, it would have been something else.

143 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:19:06am

re: #133 MandyManners

MS Maps has them.

Maybe Google Maps' contract for the database does not include that particular data. Or perhaps they have not updated yet. They both get the dataset from the same exact place.

144 MandyManners  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:19:30am

[Link: www.aboutgeorgia.net...] is down again.

145 Josephine  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:19:33am

On The Michael Coren Show last night, Sid Ryan (president of CUPE, the Canadian Union of Public Employees) blamed the whole thing on George Bush. Yes, that's right. Everyone else on the panel called him on it but, as usual, Mr. Ryan refused to budge.

146 opnion  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:20:27am

Remember several days ago when Obama spokesperson , Susan Rice ranted that McCain was bombastic & made the situation worese, while Obama was measured & statesman like?
Forget that! They are now saying that Barry & McCain are identical on the isuue. Clearly they saw the tide against them.

147 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:21:13am

Hey all y'all - asking a question I asked on the Dead Thread before I had to leave:
Has anyone seen those US Navy Ships with the Humanitarian Aid we're suposed to be sending to Georgia?
Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?

148 Dizzy26  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:21:18am

re: #131 larryK999

I question the basic premise of this story about the quality of Russia's military might. Russia is exporting 7 million barrels per day of oil. Thus, they are generating over $700 million per day. That kind of oil money can build a lot of tanks. I would be more concerned about the ability of the USA to maintain its military capability.

Eh............. And just where do they 'build a lot of tanks'? They do not have Tank Factories capable of 'fast re-building'.
( AND The US does, and can quickly double that production.)

149 Pullus Iulius  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:21:28am

Of course, it would be a durn shame if something untoward were to happen to the single tunnel that goes under the mountains between Russia and South Ossetia. Maybe right before winter. Yep. Durn shame.

150 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:21:38am

re: #146 opnion

Remember several days ago when Obama spokesperson , Susan Rice ranted that McCain was bombastic & made the situation worese, while Obama was measured & statesman like?
Forget that! They are now saying that Barry & McCain are identical on the isuue. Clearly they saw the tide against them.

Hawaii Jive-O flip-flops.

151 J'accuzzi  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:22:02am

There are old experienced pilots.
There are young reckless pilots.
There are no old reckless pilots.

Stalin was a Georgian.
Mikheil Saakashvili is a Georgian and a lawyer also.

Lawyers as leaders make me very nervous.

152 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:22:24am

re: #124 yma o hyd

I am at the point where I regard Turkey as the best of a set of bad options. The Europeans could not twist Russia's arm, because winter's coming, and they depend on Russia for 40% of their power.

Just imagine Europe tightening their belts. They should, of course, but they won't. So rather than one bad winter, the Europeans will surrender their survival to Russian good will.

You may, of course, picture how that's going to turn out.

153 pat  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:22:30am

re: #131 larryK999

I question the basic premise of this story about the quality of Russia's military might. Russia is exporting 7 million barrels per day of oil. Thus, they are generating over $700 million per day. That kind of oil money can build a lot of tanks. I would be more concerned about the ability of the USA to maintain its military capability.

We can throw in another curiosity. Russia builds fine military equipment. Its planes and tanks are top drawer. And where there are weaknesses, the Russians make it up with better or bigger weapons. But the military has not been buying the stuff. It is being sold overseas, the theory being that the sales profit will be credited for the Russian military. But that has not happened.
So where is the money going? Things like an overpriced villa in the Riviera.
BTW, your $700M translates into 140 top of the line tanks.

154 reine.de.tout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:22:52am

re: #145 Josephine

On The Michael Coren Show last night, Sid Ryan (president of CUPE, the Canadian Union of Public Employees) blamed the whole thing on George Bush. Yes, that's right. Everyone else on the panel called him on it but, as usual, Mr. Ryan refused to budge.

Bush surely is a powerful person, in these people's minds.
When he's not being mentally incompetent, that is.

155 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:23:20am

re: #147 realwest

Hey all y'all - asking a question I asked on the Dead Thread before I had to leave:
Has anyone seen those US Navy Ships with the Humanitarian Aid we're suposed to be sending to Georgia?
Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?

I replied to you over there realwest - half of the ten carriers are either in the Med or in the Arabian Gulf & environs. The only ship in particular that I have heard anything about is the hospital ship (Hope I think it is) - in NJ, they were saying it would take weeks to get there.

I am not at all sure that the Turks and the Russians will have any part of a US aircraft carrier battle group entering the Black Sea.

156 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:23:24am

re: #145 Josephine

Three days after 9/11, I was channel surfing to try to get the burning rubble of the Towers out of my head. I stumbled upon a Canadian Broadcasting Company broadcast of an NDP Town Meeting in Toronto in which the Canadian speakers was condemning the U.S. for provoking 9/11. I was stunned.

The U.S. has some friends in Canada, but the NDP and the communist-leaning Canadian labor unions are not among them.

157 Killgore Trout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:23:31am

re: #147 realwest

I read some rumors that we sent a few extra ships into the Persian gulf recently but that's all I've heard.

158 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:24:14am

re: #149 Pullus Iulius
Huh. I thought there were three tunnels - otherwise, your point is well taken!

159 reine.de.tout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:24:28am

re: #146 opnion

Remember several days ago when Obama spokesperson , Susan Rice ranted that McCain was bombastic & made the situation worese, while Obama was measured & statesman like?
Forget that! They are now saying that Barry & McCain are identical on the isuue. Clearly they saw the tide against them.

And clearly, it took Obama a few days to actually read up to learn about what it was he was trying to talk about.

160 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:24:29am

re: #126 quickjustice

Well, he hasn't been in office for quite some time...so, no, he doesn't speak for Germany. He always did lean left - oh, all right, don't whack me - but this is a curiously open sale of his influence.

161 pat  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:25:02am

Black Sea is a carrier trap.

162 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:25:08am

re: #157 Killgore Trout

I read some rumors that we sent a few extra ships into the Persian gulf recently but that's all I've heard.

Couple of weeks ago, couple of aircraft carriers. In response to Iran's threat to close the Straights.

163 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:25:16am

re: #147 realwest

A Pentagon general already has announced that the military option is not on the table in Georgia. He forgot to bring his white flag to the news conference.

164 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:25:49am

re: #159 reine.de.tout

And clearly, it took Obama a few days to actually read up to learn about what it was he was trying to talk about.

Takes awhile to read the email when you have 301 foreign policy advisers.

165 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:25:50am

re: #124 yma o hyd

Minor correction, but that was in fact Gul not Erdoğan going on record but the message I'm sure would have been the same.

What's interesting is Ahmadi 'the still living terrorist' Nejad just disembarked from his first visit to Turkey without walking-away with a signed agreement for Iran to provide Turkey gas.

Not sure what to make of that.

166 sattv4u2  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:25:57am

re: #147 realwest

Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?


After you left, I responded to you that there are carrier groups in the Mediterannean Sea (and most likely one is headed for the Adreatic Sea) Thats just a short hop via jet across Turkey to get to Tblisis. They could make it from the carrier and back before breakfast

After I posted that, someone posted a link as to where our carriers are. IIRC, it confirmed at least 2 in the Med with another 1 or 2 in or near the Persian Gulf (again, just a short hop to Georgia from there)

167 whatdafuq  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:26:43am

re: #135 yma o hyd

Well this is absolutely true:

"The starting point of the military confrontation was Georgia's march
into South Ossetia. We shouldn't confuse things," Schroeder said,
when asked who was responsible for the outbreak of violence
between Russian and Georgian troops.

But he exposes himself for the hack that he is when he says that
S. Ossetia and Abkhazia will never be part of Georgia. That's the
Russian party line and he's toeing it.

168 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:26:45am

re: #161 pat

Black Sea is a carrier trap.

Yes, and one of the technologies the Russians have been concentrating on since the end of the Cold War are anti-ship missiles.

169 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:27:30am

re: #129 pat

Be fair - they didn't have many planes, and almost no armor. They've mostly trained as light fighters, and well, that didn't leave them in very good shape to resist an armored column. In addition, their artillery had been carefully spotted by the "peacekeepers" and was suppressed almost instantly.

Which doesn't take anything away from the Russian counter-battery work, btw. I was reading somewhere that that particular piece of their invasion plan was quite well done.

170 reine.de.tout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:27:35am

re: #164 galloping granny

Takes awhile to read the email when you have 301 foreign policy advisers.

LOL. Yes. Especially when one of them is an important intellectual like George Clooney.

171 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:27:45am

re: #165 aboo-Hoo-Hoo

Minor correction, but that was in fact Gul not Erdoğan going on record but the message I'm sure would have been the same.

What's interesting is Ahmadi 'the still living terrorist' Nejad just disembarked from his first visit to Turkey without walking-away with a signed agreement for Iran to provide Turkey gas.

Not sure what to make of that.

It is even better than that. He had gone there specifically for the signing - Turkey reneged on the deal. I hear we brought lots of pressure to bear, but we must have some really substantial card in play if that is the case.

172 Russkilitlover  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:27:51am

re: #147 realwest

Hey all y'all - asking a question I asked on the Dead Thread before I had to leave:
Has anyone seen those US Navy Ships with the Humanitarian Aid we're suposed to be sending to Georgia?
Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?

I was at the beach all day yesterday. I didn't see any.....

173 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:28:01am

re: #105 galloping granny

We put in some law or other that disallows assassinations of foreign heads of state.

I suspect we'll regret that someday.

}:)     ["What are we supposed to use, Sarge, harsh language?" -- Aliens.]

174 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:28:09am

re: #155 galloping granny Is the USS Hope our only Hospital Ship? (I honestly don't know but if it is, I find that rather depressing). And as I mentioned on the DT, each one of those carriers has 6 operating rooms and the equivalent of a 200 bed hospital. And can churn out enough fresh water for approximately 5,000 people a day without affecting the carrier's ability to supply itself.
As to "I am not at all sure that the Turks and the Russians will have any part of a US aircraft carrier battle group entering the Black Sea."
Well I'm sure that the Russians, at least, won't want it - not quite so sure of Turkey (is it a member of NATO ?) but in either event, I'm not sure what either Russia or Turkey could do about it.

175 opnion  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:28:27am

re: #170 reine.de.tout

LOL. Yes. Especially when one of them is an important intellectual like George Clooney.

Hey now, he has his GED!

176 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:28:30am

re: #147 realwest

Hey all y'all - asking a question I asked on the Dead Thread before I had to leave:
Has anyone seen those US Navy Ships with the Humanitarian Aid we're suposed to be sending to Georgia?
Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?

Where are the Carriers?

I don't think CVN can make it through the Bosporus.

I haven't seen anything on the sealift yet.

177 reine.de.tout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:28:53am

re: #105 galloping granny

We put in some law or other that disallows assassinations of foreign heads of state.

I think it's actually some sort of presidential executive order.

178 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:29:16am

re: #147 realwest

Hey all y'all - asking a question I asked on the Dead Thread before I had to leave:
Has anyone seen those US Navy Ships with the Humanitarian Aid we're suposed to be sending to Georgia?
Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?

Now there are always far fewer deployable CBGs than the number of decks in commission. During normal operations about a third of the decks are deployed a third are in training and a third are undergoing maintenance. For an emergency we can surge some but not all of the forces in the training cycle to get a little over half the fleet to a potential combat zone. The fact is that the Navy and all of our armed forces are half the size they should be. It will take at least 6 years to fix this. We are in a very tough spot.

179 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:29:20am

re: #173 Kulhwch

I suspect we'll regret that someday.

}:)     ["What are we supposed to use, Sarge, harsh language?" -- Aliens.]

You mean we don't yet?

180 filetandrelease  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:29:31am

re: #20 rwmofo

I never tried to wear down a bear, but I'm positve that I'll never poke a leopard with a stick.

LOL, that was funny. Or not.

181 Josephine  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:30:24am

re: #154 reine.de.tout

Bush surely is a powerful person, in these people's minds.
When he's not being mentally incompetent, that is.

Yes, he said it was all Bush's fault because the U.S. was selling arms to Georgia and building up a huge arsenal (I can't remember his exact words). Michael Coren told him that the U.S., China and Russia have a huge arsenal, while Georgia is a small country with, at best, a reservist force.

I still remember one show when Michael Coren asked Sid Ryan to read the Hamas constitution. (The leaders of CUPE are actively pro-"Palestinian" and rabidly anti-Israel.) Sid Ryan was angry and he absolutely refused. He said something like, "I will do no such thing!"

For the CUPE leaders, George Bush and Israel are to blame for everything that is wrong with the world.

Oooops, I'm going out now, to drink coffee and watch while the normal people eat real food.

182 akak  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:31:13am

re: #161 pat

Black Sea is a carrier trap.

Have to agree.

183 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:31:36am

re: #163 quickjustice What? Bush has said (or approved some general saying) that the military option is off the table?
Do y'all have a link to that?

184 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:32:19am

re: #166 sattv4u2 Ah, thank you.

185 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:33:39am

re: #170 reine.de.tout

LOL. Yes. Especially when one of them is an important intellectual like George Clooney George C. Looney.

Fixed it for ya.

186 whatdafuq  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:34:04am

re: #152 Dianna

Turkey? They did the same thing to Cyprus that Russia is doing to
Georgia!

After some unwise moves by the Cypriot government the Turks invaded
and established a phony "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" in '71.
The stated goal was "to protect the Turks" on the island, the same
BS that Russia said regarding S. Ossetia, "protecting Russians outside
of the federation".

And now the TRNC is occupied by 30,000 or so troops. International
calls to TNRC get routed through Turkey. Mail to TNRC is a maildrop in
Turkey. It's effectively part of Turkey. And this "independent country"
is recognized by no one except Turkey. This is what Russia wants with
S. Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Turkey? Why don't you want to harass and destabalize the Turkish
troops occupying an internationally recognized country (Cyprus) the
way you want to harass and destabalize the Russian troops
occupying an internationally recognized country (Georgia)?

187 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:34:09am
188 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:34:12am

re: #147 realwest

Hey all y'all - asking a question I asked on the Dead Thread before I had to leave:
Has anyone seen those US Navy Ships with the Humanitarian Aid we're suposed to be sending to Georgia?
Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?

Haven't heard a thing since the original statement real but I honestly don't think we'd want a group getting bottled-up in the Black Sea - they'd be sitting ducks from every direction, from anybody who had anything to shoot-and-scoot.

189 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:34:20am

It would make more sense to put an LHA/LHD into the Black Sea with land based air cover. The amphib is a floating hospital. We have two hospital ships in commission.

190 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:34:43am

re: #152 Dianna

I understand that.
However, I personally cannot stomach handing over more power to yet another islamic country.
Thats why I think a different approach,difficult as it may seem at the moment, must be sought.
As to Europe not wanting to tighten their belts - hah, those belts are being tightened as we speak, due to the much more dire economic outlook all across the countries.

It might also help if a general sort of truce were called between the animadversions of the two continents, where the one side speaks of Eurowinies and sings from songsheets provided by journos who don't seem to have a clue about the general conditions there, the politics and histories but are playing for a guffaw from the crowd - and where the other side has been fed similar guff about the USA, through their mostly loonie left media, even those with formerly proud traditions.

It looks as if the LLL from the USA have provided the tunes to the LLL in Europe, and as if the LLL in Europe is providing the ammunition for the LLL in the USA, like a reciprocal echo chamber.
Thus right-thinking peoples don't know whom or what to trust.

Its gotta stop - it really has.
Better to work on that, than to elevate an islamic state to the role of power-broker in Europe.

191 Spiny Norman  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:34:45am

re: #52 rwmofo

OT: Pelosi will allow drilling in the OCS, but only if they raise costs and taxes on "Big Oil."

"Her priorities include a repeal of royalty relief for offshore drillers and an end to other tax credits for the biggest oil companies, as well as so-called use it or lose it legislation forcing energy companies to relinquish un-used leases."

Translation: Make "Big Oil" pay!

Oh wait. That will make the price of gas go up as well, right?

"Little Oil" was unavailable for comment.

Queen Nancy might allow a little more drilling, but makes damn sure the price at the pump goes up anyway... which she and her fellow Kleptocrats will hold up as "proof" that Big Oil is just out to rape the consumer.

Gawd, that woman is an idiot.

192 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:35:26am

We're about to find out how rotten the NATO Alliance really is. If NATO is as rotten as Bolten says, it's time to replace it with bi-lateral defense treaties with those who want to participate in pushing back against the Russians or any other aggressors. Everyone else can kiss Russia's gluteus maximus.

Poland's demand for a bilateral defense treaty wit the U.S. is proof positive of how rotten and ineffective NATO now is perceived to be.

193 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:36:01am

re: #179 galloping granny

You mean we don't yet?

I was attempting to be tongue-in-cheek.

}:)     [Presumably subtlety isn't my thing ... heh ... ]

194 reine.de.tout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:36:03am

re: #181 Josephine

Yes, he said it was all Bush's fault because the U.S. was selling arms to Georgia and building up a huge arsenal (I can't remember his exact words). Michael Coren told him that the U.S., China and Russia have a huge arsenal, while Georgia is a small country with, at best, a reservist force.

I still remember one show when Michael Coren asked Sid Ryan to read the Hamas constitution. (The leaders of CUPE are actively pro-"Palestinian" and rabidly anti-Israel.) Sid Ryan was angry and he absolutely refused. He said something like, "I will do no such thing!"

For the CUPE leaders, George Bush and Israel are to blame for everything that is wrong with the world.

Oooops, I'm going out now, to drink coffee and watch while the normal people eat real food.

Thanks for the info.
But . . . you don't eat real food?

195 Pullus Iulius  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:36:19am

re: #174 realwest

The Navy has two hospital ships (more like complete medical centers), USNS Mercy and USNS Comfort. I drive past Comfort when I go through Baltimore, but haven't seen her in a while. I'm guessing she's the one that would go.

196 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:36:43am

re: #116 Walter L. Newton

The first time I went to Warsaw, I spent a good amount of time at home trying to pick up enough Polish to get arrested or something.

I was speaking a an English speaking Pole while there and mentioned that playing "Wheel of Fortune" in Poland must be expensive, considering the vowels must cost a fortune.

He didn't think that was too funny.

LOL. My mothers maiden name has 3 vowels, 5 consonants. We always liked to say that Polish names contain 150% of your minimum daily requirement of consonants.

197 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:36:44am

re: #191 Spiny Norman

Queen Nancy might allow a little more drilling, but makes damn sure the price at the pump goes up anyway... which she and her fellow Kleptocrats will hold up as "proof" that Big Oil is just out to rape the consumer.

Gawd, that woman is an idiot.

McCain should run against Pelosi as much as against Obama. If Palin is his VP choice she would be perfect for that.

198 scullymj  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:37:23am

re: #9 theheat

Whenever people speak in absolutes, they're usually dead wrong. I wouldn't underestimate Russian forces, nor do I feel any better because Stuart Koehl chooses to do so.

Good point. I hope the assessment is correct but seems I heard the same thing in '65 about a little band called The National Liberation Front.

199 reine.de.tout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:37:29am

re: #185 Colonel Panik

Fixed it for ya.

Hm. Second time you've had to fix it for me. You'd think I'd get it sooner or later.

200 beldar67  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:37:29am

re: #64 Sharmuta

I don't doubt that Russia would go nuclear over a Chinese invasion. That is an existential threat.

201 Sacred Plants  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:37:32am

re: #126 quickjustice

Not to put too fine a point upon it, but Schroeder's transparently a whore for his Russian masters. If I were German, I'd strip him of his right to be called "Germany's" anything. Does he really speak for Germany and the German people?

Give them whatever worked so well against Jimmy Carter...

These apologists count on the fact that the third dimension is lost in the Western perception. Look at cartoons like this or this or this. In the Western mind Georgia seems to be a flat country. This writer, though his suggestions remind of the Carter-Afghanistan debacle (and the Caucasian mujahideen are waiting for development aid), at least has in mind that it is a mountaineous country. The Greater Cacausus ridge is the natural border between Russia and Georgia, and this is why any presence of Russian troops south of that ridge is the proverbial camel nose in the tent.

202 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:37:36am

re: #197 lifeofthemind

McCain should run against Pelosi as much as against Obama. If Palin is his VP choice she would be perfect for that.

BINGO!

203 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:37:38am
204 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:37:42am

re: #151 J'accuzzi

And your point is?

205 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:38:04am

re: #195 Pullus Iulius
Oh, thanks! What about the Hope?

206 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:39:18am

re: #165 aboo-Hoo-Hoo

Yep, that lacking deal between Turkey and Iran was briefly mentioned here yesterday - it is a very intrigueing piece of news, and a thoughtful analysis of what went on there would be more than welcome.

It is in fact very surprising in view of the current situation, with that pipeline through Georgia terminating in Turkey.

Would love to know what happened there ...

207 The Other Les  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:40:48am

re: #125 lifeofthemind

Personally I think Putin is in a very bad spot and would have a hard time finding anyone willing to sell him life insurance.


Outside of San Francisco, Boston, New York, or Denver, that is.

208 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:40:57am

re: #168 Colonel Panik

Ever heard of Aegis?

209 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:41:01am

re: #203 ploome hineni

At least England and France declared war on Germany. It was a war they weren't ready for, but they honored that treaty obligation, unlike their contemptible treatment of the Czechs and the Austrians.

210 JHW  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:41:31am
211 David IV of Georgia  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:41:53am

re: #10 Sharmuta

It's occurred to me that if anyone wanted to take a potshot at Russia right now, Russia would be hard up for anyone coming to their defense. Brilliant strategy there, putin.

If China or someone took this as an open door to attack Russia, we'd probably be stupid enough to step up and help Russia and get spit in the face for our help...

....

I know quite a few Russians. They have a small professional group of soldiers that run their military. These soldiers are half decent fighters. The bulk of their military is draftees that don't want to be soldiers and mostly hope to go back home in one piece someday. I've also known a few Russian draft dodgers. Russians will naturally tend to be patriotic and support their country no matter how idiotic the cause—until their sons begin to return in body bags (Afghanistan). Their military is fragile, but that said, it is always stupid to underestimate an enemy—Somalia remind anyone of anything?

212 Aylios  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:41:53am

re: #12 Kulhwch

The Georgians should probably take a look back at who's twisted the bear's nads in the past, and take lessons from them.  Afganistan is a very good textbook to read in that light.

}:P     [I never thought I'd be saying "Damn the Russians" in this day and age ... ]


Someone needs to rip em right off.

213 Dianna  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:42:14am

re: #190 yma o hyd

If we used Turkey for a staging area, would that be acceptable?

214 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:42:51am

re: #167 whatdafuq

Good thing he's out of German politics - I don't think even his party comrades would have swallowed that.

(OT - I have to say that Angela Merkel is growing in stature. Like may, I had lots of reservations, but I'm glad its her, and not a leftie who is the current Chancellor of Germany.)

215 Pullus Iulius  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:42:53am

re: #205 realwest

According to Project Hope, the SS Hope was the world's first peacetime hospital ship, and was retired in 1974. I was wondering the same thing myself. Time flies.

216 Aylios  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:44:24am

re: #19 Kulhwch

"Yoo hoo, China, look ... you can see Russia's knickers, they're bent over Georgia so far ... "

}:/     [Tough call on our part though: what to do if China DID take Russia ... ]

A tough call?
Ah ok, you mean should we sit back and eat popcorn with coke to enjoy the show or go for the McDonald's Super-meal with extras and stay tuned right till the finish.

Gotcha.

217 realwest  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:45:11am

re: #211 David IV of Georgia "Somalia remind anyone of anything?"
Yeah, Bill Clinton.

218 Kulhwch  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:45:12am

re: #212 Aylios

}:)     [Absolutely no argument from me on that ... ]

219 rusty_armor  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:45:17am

I think that a huge backlash against Russia by it's former Soviet bloc alllies is happening now. They are all clamoring to join NATO ...

220 DistantThunder  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:47:15am

Anyone know where I can find some good pictures of the destruction of GEorgia? Who is blogging this on site?

221 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:49:27am

re: #171 galloping granny

re: #206 yma o hyd

Ahmadi's been jerking-around potential clients with varying prices and deals, India and Pakistan have been more verbal than most about Tehran's mucking-about but even they are pretty damned quiet about the details. ...I would suspect it has more than a little to do with their respective relationships with us.

222 Perry  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:49:43am

re: #220 DistantThunder

Michael Totten is on the way. Haven't heard of anyone else.

223 The Other Les  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:50:48am

re: #191 Spiny Norman

Gawd, that woman is an idiot.


The difference between stupidity and evil is who it effects.

224 tommygum  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:51:50am

re: #60 galloping granny

A friend just sent me this - WOAH! This is what you call "Telling it like it is!"

[Link: www.atimes.com...]

Required reading!

225 Aylios  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:52:10am

re: #40 Ruthless
That's awesome Ruthless, you ought to be writing editorials!

226 galloping granny  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:52:19am

re: #220 DistantThunder

Anyone know where I can find some good pictures of the destruction of GEorgia? Who is blogging this on site?

[Link: www.gettyimages.com...]

227 reine.de.tout  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:53:11am

re: #220 DistantThunder

Anyone know where I can find some good pictures of the destruction of GEorgia? Who is blogging this on site?

The only one I know about is at FoxNews.

228 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:53:39am

re: #192 quickjustice

We're about to find out how rotten the NATO Alliance really is. If NATO is as rotten as Bolten says, it's time to replace it with bi-lateral defense treaties with those who want to participate in pushing back against the Russians or any other aggressors. Everyone else can kiss Russia's gluteus maximus.

Poland's demand for a bilateral defense treaty wit the U.S. is proof positive of how rotten and ineffective NATO now is perceived to be.

I don't think its rotten, I think it has gone soft (peace-dividend, anyone?) after the fall and break-up of the Soviet Union.
One the one hand, the ll beancounters in all NATO states, right across the board, have cut down on expenditure, size, equipment and development, of their Armed Forces, cutting it right abck to the bone (while the left jubilated - pity the saved dosh didn't mean lower taxes but only ever more bureaucrats!).
On the other hand, you have personnel right across the board whor egard thsi as a cushy job, lots of dinners, parties, not many decisions, long talks - nice, but again, too many chiefs, not enough indians. And no experience in real crisis decision making any longer.
Real comabt-experienced commanders wouldn't be seen dead at NATO headquarters - wasn't one of their chiefs a certain Wesley Clarke?

So - a root-and-branch reform is needed, and I'dl ove to have Bolton wield the iron broom here as well - but rotten it isn't, just tons of dead wood.

229 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:54:54am

re: #203 ploome hineni

bilateral defense treaty with Poland

woo hoo

remember the last such treaty, Poland and England?

Poland must agree to some level of military status/preparedness

The Poles have been rapidly building up their military over the past few years, modernizing everything from aircraft (they've been replacing their MiG 21's and 29 and Su-22's with F-16's) to small arms (they are now building and fielding an AK variant chambered for 5.56mm NATO to standardize ammo with NATO forces). They have an aviation factory that is turning out HIND attack helicopters. They've been training with US, Swedish and Israeli advisors and have gained combat experience in Iraq. The Poland of 2008 is not the Poland of 1938.

Perhaps intentionally the Russian threat yesterday came on Poland's Army Day, when they celebrate the 1920 victory of the Polish army over the Soviet army in the "Miracle on the Vistula".

230 JHW  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:55:02am

I still think back incredulously at Clinton's "Re-Inventing Government" farce, led by Al Gore, the only place they could find to cut any fat was the US military, several Army divisions, Air Force Wings and Navy ships disbanded, cut or axed. The world wasn't dangerous anymore, and we could "invest" in programs, otherwise known as buying votes.

231 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:56:25am

re: #213 Dianna

If we used Turkey for a staging area, would that be acceptable?

Oh yes it would - but remember what they did, refusing transit to US troups going into Iraq, at the last minute ...

232 yma o hyd  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:58:16am

re: #229 Colonel Panik

Thanks for that info - so it was again a well-planned 'outburst', rather than some Russian general letting rip ...

233 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:58:40am

re: #9 theheat

Whenever people speak in absolutes, they're usually dead wrong. I wouldn't underestimate Russian forces, nor do I feel any better because Stuart Koehl chooses to do so.

That's right. You can't type or wish away 10,000-15,000 tactical and strategic nuclear warheads.

234 Colonel Panik  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:01:53am

re: #208 Dianna

Ever heard of Aegis?

Yes. And it is an impressive system, but I'd still be cautious about carrier group operations in such a limited space and hostile area.

And unfortunately we no longer have the Tomcat, which provided a much bigger CAP space over our fleets than the present Super Hornets.

235 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:07:55am

re: #233 Sol Roth

That's right. You can't type or wish away 10,000-15,000 tactical and strategic nuclear warheads.

The might have that many, but only a fraction are in play. The SSBN's are not a factor, if they could get to sea they would never get a chance to launch. The Bombers the ones they could get in the air wouldn't get close. Their land based missiles are a mixed lot, it's doubtful any of the liquid birds are launch-able, only the solid rocket one are reliable and maintenance on those has been cut back.

It not about number of warheads, it the nuclear exchange calculation. In nuclear terms Russian has only a partial first strike capacity, they have no counter strike. On the other hand our triad is fully operational.

It would suicide for Russia to go that route they would not survive.

236 looking closely  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:11:32am

re: #131 larryK999

I question the basic premise of this story about the quality of Russia's military might. Russia is exporting 7 million barrels per day of oil. Thus, they are generating over $700 million per day. That kind of oil money can build a lot of tanks. I would be more concerned about the ability of the USA to maintain its military capability.

First of all, the fact that they are grossing $700 million a day means very little. The question is how much of that gross is actually available for military use. Lots of it has to go for other gov't functions including social services, and I suspect there is a lot of corruption and wastage, meaning they're not getting the full effect of the money they have.

Next issue, is that its not just quantity, its quality. Spending lots of money on inferior or easily defeated equipment is pretty easy to do. Ultimately, no matter how good the equipment, the training and quality of the soldiers manning it matters more.

Lastly, no matter what the cash situation, there is still a tactical and logistical reality on the ground. Having 10,000 tanks doesn't help when there are only 2 or 3 passes that the tanks can go through, and they are easily blocked.

237 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:13:28am

I'd say the Russians already have proven themselves tough adversaries. And I haven't seen anything suggesting anything different.

Koehl says the Russian military is a "paper tiger"? You only prove that by shredding the paper.

238 irongrampa  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:15:52am

If the Russians intend to remain in Georgia in force for longer than 2 months top, it's going to be a cold miserable winter for them. That situation is tailor made for aysmmetrical warfare,which is precisely what's in store, unless I'm grossly mistaken.

Don't believe the Russian military, in it's present readiness, is up to the task of countering a determined insurgency that the Georgians could institute.

239 looking closely  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:17:43am

re: #139 Colonel Panik

Its pretty clear from his comments that McCain understands that the recent spike in oil prices has been funding most of the world's bad actors and dictators, like the Soviets, Iran, etc. From that sort of foreign policy perspective, McCain is actually probably the strongest candidate in this election across the board.

Meanwhile, its actually not at all clear to me that Obama even understands this fundamental point, let alone that he would be prepared to do anything about it.

If the price of oil were to go back to $60/bbl Iran, Russia, and Venezuela would all be sucking wind.

240 wolfgang  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:18:19am

The comment about a small, hard diamond point mounted on a wooden stick sounds vaguely reminiscent of the actual state of the United States military and the actual status of a variety of historical enemies of the Soviet Union. In the case of the United States that stick is made from a wood softer than balsa wood, all of any hardness that may be found in it, is concentrated in the daily activities of the residents of San Francisco and the like. The country that mounted and carried out a more than effective, victorious, titanic two ocean struggle against two proponents of world wide fascism has degenerated into a coast to coast, modern version of Soddom and Gommorrha, unwilling and unable to defend itself from attacks from without, being so self indulgent, pleasure seeking, rotten, and corroded from within.

241 kuffar  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:19:10am

We can do nothing and will be unable to do anything until the Liberals are a minority and the Republican party has been politically cleansed. Unfortunately too many people are addicted to the hand-outs the Liberals give. So that isn't going to change anytime soon.

President Barack and Liberalis are running on the Surrender America ticket and roughly half the country is blind to it.

242 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:20:14am

re: #237 quickjustice

I'd say the Russians already have proven themselves tough adversaries. And I haven't seen anything suggesting anything different.

Koehl says the Russian military is a "paper tiger"? You only prove that by shredding the paper.

Against who?
Russian tactics and hardware have had their asses handed to them every time they've go up against Western tactics and hardware. It is well known, Russia has moral, maintenance, supply, and readiness issues.

Russia vs. Georgia proves a sixth grade bully can knock down a first grader and take his lunch money.

243 paint-right  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:21:19am

Don't know if anyone has mentioned anything like this , but I just looked up statistics form Chernobyl. It occurred to me that even though the military might be weak, they may not be afraid to use nukes, as the fallout from chernobyl was not as disastrous as anticipated. In other words, they can bomb and then go in to clean up and run the place in relatively short while.


>The Chernobyl accident in 1986 was the result of a flawed reactor design that was operated with inadequately trained personnel and without proper regard for safety.
>The resulting steam explosion and fire released at least five percent of the radioactive reactor core into the atmosphere and downwind.
>28 people died within four months from radiation or thermal burns, 19 have subsequently died, and there have been around nine deaths from thyroid cancer apparently due to the accident: total 56 fatalities as of 2004.
>An authoritative UN report in 2000 concluded that there is no scientific evidence of any significant radiation-related health effects to most people exposed. This was confirmed in a very thorough 2005-06 study.
more info here

244 THX-42  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:24:07am

The pathetic state of Russia's conventional forces is completely irrelevant here. Their nuclear forces are still very formidable. And therefore, nether we nor NATO, are going to take any military action. Russia understands this very well.

It wouldn't surprise me at all, in fact, if rather than honoring the ceasefire agreement, the Russians merely press on and take the Georgian capital and depose the current government. There would be all sorts of UN and US yada-yada, but no action. The Russian "out" will most likely be the installation of a "transition government" (of their choosing, of course) and a suspensin of the Gergian constitution until some vague future election can "restore order". In the meantime, the Russians will park their forces in the breakaway provinces until further notice.

The Russians have learned the "clean and jerk" move well. They know they can get away with it, so they'll do it and not worry about the resolutions, condemnations, and other assorted yapping from the West.

In the meantime, Ukraine should start worrying. They're next on Russia's hit list.

245 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:28:06am

re: #242 jcm

To track your metaphor, the Sixth grade bully gets away with it, and terrorizes everyone on the playground, until a larger classmate, or a teacher, intervenes.

So where's the "teacher" here?

246 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:30:56am

re: #235 jcm

The might have that many, but only a fraction are in play. The SSBN's are not a factor, if they could get to sea they would never get a chance to launch. The Bombers the ones they could get in the air wouldn't get close. Their land based missiles are a mixed lot, it's doubtful any of the liquid birds are launch-able, only the solid rocket one are reliable and maintenance on those has been cut back.

It not about number of warheads, it the nuclear exchange calculation. In nuclear terms Russian has only a partial first strike capacity, they have no counter strike. On the other hand our triad is fully operational.

It would suicide for Russia to go that route they would not survive.

We maintain a strategic deterrent of parity or above for what reason?
Billions of dollars in maintaining a stockpile for what threat?

A full exchange has always been suicidal. However, I'm sure you don't intend to categorically discount the either inadvertent or deliberate, rogue deployment of a tactical device/delivery system. They've already threatened to nuke Poland.

I understand your calculus, really I do. I just don't share your faith in the predictability of Communists or terrorists (or both working together) armed with thermonuclear weapons.

247 JHW  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:30:57am

re: #244 THX-42

Another thing that kind of bothers me, all this strategy and tactics being discussed and no one has either mentioned or considered, like a US commander would have to do, is our right flank. That's Afghanistan and a google search shows, to a certain extent, in the most general manner how and through what countries it is resupplied. It was a topic of discussion earlier this year between NATO and Russia.

248 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:31:58am

re: #245 quickjustice

To track your metaphor, the Sixth grade bully gets away with it, and terrorizes everyone on the playground, until a larger classmate, or a teacher, intervenes.

So where's the "teacher" here?

Bluntly put we are.
We either deal with it or it stands.
For the rest of the story read European history from Rhineland '36 to May '45.

249 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:33:50am

re: #240 wolfgang

The comment about a small, hard diamond point mounted on a wooden stick sounds vaguely reminiscent of the actual state of the United States military and the actual status of a variety of historical enemies of the Soviet Union. In the case of the United States that stick is made from a wood softer than balsa wood, all of any hardness that may be found in it, is concentrated in the daily activities of the residents of San Francisco and the like. The country that mounted and carried out a more than effective, victorious, titanic two ocean struggle against two proponents of world wide fascism has degenerated into a coast to coast, modern version of Soddom and Gommorrha, unwilling and unable to defend itself from attacks from without, being so self indulgent, pleasure seeking, rotten, and corroded from within.

You mean like the armored pussies that made the most rapid advance in history to take Baghdad and the third largest army in the world, or the pansies that are currently fighting a two front war against Islamonaziism on the other side of the world?

250 kuffar  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:34:10am

re: #245 quickjustice

To track your metaphor, the Sixth grade bully gets away with it, and terrorizes everyone on the playground, until a larger classmate, or a teacher, intervenes.

So where's the "teacher" here?

Don't ask/Don't tell.

251 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:36:40am

re: #246 Sol Roth

We maintain a strategic deterrent of parity or above for what reason?
Billions of dollars in maintaining a stockpile for what threat?

A full exchange has always been suicidal. However, I'm sure you don't intend to categorically discount the either inadvertent or deliberate, rogue deployment of a tactical device/delivery system. They've already threatened to nuke Poland.

I understand your calculus, really I do. I just don't share your faith in the predictability of Communists or terrorists (or both working together) armed with thermonuclear weapons.

Russians / communist are rational (in their terms) the might want control of the world, but know blowing it hell and gone is a losing proposition.

The Soviets and Russia maintain a massive defensive posture because of a deep cultural paranoia, they simply do not understand deep down we have no desire to conquer them.

The Madhi Islamists see blowing the world to hell and gone as a win!

Big difference.

252 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:39:19am

re: #251 jcm

Russians / communist are rational (in their terms) the might want control of the world, but know blowing it hell and gone is a losing proposition.

The Soviets and Russia maintain a massive defensive posture because of a deep cultural paranoia, they simply do not understand deep down we have no desire to conquer them.

The Madhi Islamists see blowing the world to hell and gone as a win!

Big difference.

Then why do we maintain over 9,000 warheads and a triad of delivery systems?

253 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:39:43am

re: #240 wolfgang

has degenerated into a coast to coast, modern version of Soddom and Gommorrha

Not to mention our nation's declining spelling skills.

Go read John Keegan's The Iraq War if you really think the US military is a rotten balsa wood stick. Get some education.

254 swamprat  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:41:05am

This invasion is the best sales incentive for the United States proposed Defense Shield, that any reasonable human being could ask for. The small countries bordering Russia will be lining up in droves to protect themselves from this marauding bear. If Russia was the sincere protector that she would have you believe, she would be requesting United Nations support. This is a farce. This might even disgust the American left. Cancel that. If you liked Che, you'll love Putin.

255 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:43:54am

re: #210 JHW

Events are moving very quickly, the Eastern European fat ladies are starting to sing:
Ukraine Says Ready to Work With West on Missile Defense
Ukraine to Join in US led Missile Shield
Ukraine's Top Military Official requests Defense Spending Increase

This reinforces my belief that no matter how awed people are now by Putin's big, salty, chocolate balls, this move is a net loser for Russia.

256 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:45:21am

re: #252 Sol Roth

Then why do we maintain over 9,000 warheads and a triad of delivery systems?

Because we're... planning on conquering Russia, and ruling their radioactive wastelands as our colonies?

257 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:46:39am

re: #255 Occasional Reader

This reinforces my belief that no matter how awed people are now by Putin's big, salty, chocolate balls, this move is a net loser for Russia.

Chef got whacked and Isaac Hayes just passed away. Putin's balls, uh, I don't want to think about it.

258 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:47:10am

re: #256 Occasional Reader

Because we're... planning on conquering Russia, and ruling their radioactive wastelands as our colonies?

OR you can do better than that.

259 DistantThunder  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:47:12am

re: #41 rawmuse

I hear Eric Prince (founder) speak recently and he said, without equivocation, that he is getting out of the business.

Where and when was that?

260 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:48:21am

If it's true what Koehl and Peters both say; that Russian air forces have tried multiple times to hit that gas pipeline, and failed; by the standards of this day and age, that' ASTONISHINGLY bad performance. That's like World War II stuff. For the US military, that job would take one pass, with one plane, dropping one bomb.

261 kuffar  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:49:32am

re: #253 Occasional Reader

Not to mention our nation's declining spelling skills.

Go read John Keegan's The Iraq War if you really think the US military is a rotten balsa wood stick. Get some education.

The US Military is not America anymore than the Democratic party is America.

However, the military is the tip of the spear and it is hard-steel blood-stained from countless engagements and great struggles. The shaft of the spear is the Rest of america and it is flaccid wood so to speak.

262 DistantThunder  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:49:36am

re: #260 Occasional Reader

If it's true what Koehl and Peters both say; that Russian air forces have tried multiple times to hit that gas pipeline, and failed; by the standards of this day and age, that' ASTONISHINGLY bad performance. That's like World War II stuff. For the US military, that job would take one pass, with one plane, dropping one bomb.

The hallmarks of central planning and control are inefficient and dysfunctional systems.

263 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:50:11am

re: #258 Sol Roth

OR you can do better than that.

In response to "...they simply do not understand deep down we have no desire to conquer them", you replied with the rhetorical "Then why do we maintain over 9,000 warheads and a triad of delivery systems?"

I find your reply... curious.

264 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:50:47am

re: #252 Sol Roth

Then why do we maintain over 9,000 warheads and a triad of delivery systems?

Our view is not paranoid. The Soviets prove to be expansionist. The spent a huge portion of their GDP on an offensive postured military aimed at Europe. 2nd China, a large and growing threat. 3rd Iran, they'll have one soon.

Communism has historically only expanded violently, should Russian fall back into that habit, the threat of those weapons will be needed.

Finally nuclear weapons cannot be wished away al la BHO. Nuclear fission is a part of nature (go look at the sun) the technology is not that hard, just detailed and expensive.

Lastly I would contended the world is better off with them. There has not been a major conflict since they've been deployed. 120 million died in wars 1900-1945, 17 million '45 to '90.

265 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:53:40am

re: #264 jcm

Nuclear fission is a part of nature (go look at the sun)

That's fusion, of course, but your broader point stands.

266 Steffan  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:55:17am

re: #49 Shane

To #17 the Bluecannuck;

Quantity means nothing anymore. It just changes the pay load being brought to the battle field. As far as Leningrad goes, Hitler simply didn't learn the lesson of Thermopolis. Don't fight them, go around them, cut off the food supply. I hope we are smarter than that. We seemed to have learned our lesson if you look at Tora Bora. We had little to gain and only lives to lose fighting the terrorists in their pre-arranged battle ground, so we stopped. Backed up and waited for them to come to us.

The fact is, an army of 10-15 thousand dedicated with the right equipment could go in quickly and kick Russia out of Georgia. But you have a small window of about 3 days before reinforcements are sent. The trick is not to drive them out but to kill all the Russians so they can't regroup. Then the incoming force is a new force so you have to set up for them coming quickly. Over all, it would be best to use Blackwater or another group as arms dealers and funnel them weapons. Second, bring them into NATO. Third, set up the missle shield in as many countries as you can. Fourth, start knocking down satellites at sea(cut off communications). Fifth, make incursions into Russia and take out power lines and gas lines. No people.

Anyway, that would be my plan. And numbers wouldn't matter.

Adding one comment to your plan: There is one good road, through a tunnel, from Russia to Georgia. All the rest are mountain tracks, fit for mules or goats.

Drop a JDAM into the south end of that tunnel.

267 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:55:49am

re: #263 Occasional Reader

In response to "...they simply do not understand deep down we have no desire to conquer them", you replied with the rhetorical "Then why do we maintain over 9,000 warheads and a triad of delivery systems?"

I find your reply... curious.

My response is better read in the context of #246 and my complete exchange with jcm.

The point is that we maintain our immensely destructive arsenal for a reason. A very good reason. That is because stupidity has a habit of getting its way.

268 Quintus_Arius  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:58:27am

Ukraine and Poland are not Georgia. This little escapade by Putin got their attention.

It's about time Putin takes a little heat for his mistake. This time Bush has the best hand. Double down GW.

269 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:58:42am

re: #267 Sol Roth

My response is better read in the context of #246 and my complete exchange with jcm.

The point is that we maintain our immensely destructive arsenal for a reason. A very good reason. That is because stupidity has a habit of getting its way.

My apologies, I misunderstood. We are in agreement on this point.

270 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:59:10am

re: #265 Occasional Reader

That's fusion, of course, but your broader point stands.

D'oh!

Back to physics 101 with me!

271 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 11:59:20am

re: #240 wolfgang

Your argument was Bin Laden's argument for attacking America. He thought the U.S. had gone soft.

I'd say the U.S. is soft until it's aroused. "Don't tread on me!", remember?

272 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:00:10pm

re: #267 Sol Roth

My response is better read in the context of #246 and my complete exchange with jcm.

The point is that we maintain our immensely destructive arsenal for a reason. A very good reason. That is because stupidity has a habit of getting its way.

That I can agree with wholeheartedly!

273 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:01:24pm

re: #267 Sol Roth

As I've noted before, to me a plausible (unfortunately) scenario if US forces were to hit Russians forces directly in Georgia, would be a tactical nuke strike on Incirlik. He'd then, in effect, dare us to escalate. And he'd feel confident about winning the "who's crazier" contest.

274 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:01:51pm

re: #261 kuffar

The US Military is not America anymore than the Democratic party is America.

However, the military is the tip of the spear and it is hard-steel blood-stained from countless engagements and great struggles. The shaft of the spear is the Rest of america and it is flaccid wood so to speak.

Not everyone can be a warrior in the military.

America is being attacked by the ideology of Collectivism. Many of us are soft, both in mind and body. However, a greater number are older, wiser, harder and teach our young how to shoot a rifle and speak the truth.

There are a lot of dead sand nazis who underestimated the will of America's heart.

275 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:02:37pm

re: #271 quickjustice

I'd say the U.S. is soft until it's aroused.

We're soft wood, until we're aroused; then we become aroused wood.

And then it swiftly becomes a turgid situation for all.

276 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:03:46pm

re: #273 Occasional Reader

He'd then, in effect, dare us to escalate.

"He" being Putin, as my lousy sentence structure did not make clear.

277 SFGoth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:04:18pm

re: #18 jcm

They want to be in Georgian when winter came, then be able the blame the weather for not pulling out.

Thank god for manmade global warming! In fact, we should have a slogan: Save Georgia, Stop Winter, Burn Oil

278 Sol Roth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:04:20pm

re: #273 Occasional Reader

As I've noted before, to me a plausible (unfortunately) scenario if US forces were to hit Russians forces directly in Georgia, would be a tactical nuke strike on Incirlik. He'd then, in effect, dare us to escalate. And he'd feel confident about winning the "who's crazier" contest.

We're back to wargaming the Russians and nuclear brinksmanship. I think that is the signal Bush sent with the recent presser on the steps of the CIA. Thanks for helping me figure that one out!

279 quickjustice  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:04:53pm

re: #275 Occasional Reader

That's when "Bend over!" becomes our watchword. And we will be bending Putin over when? ;-)

280 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:07:53pm

re: #279 quickjustice

That's when "Bend over!" becomes our watchword. And we will be bending Putin over when? ;-)

It's all explained here.

281 Occasional Reader  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:08:04pm

Later.

282 itellu3times  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:15:45pm

re: #264 jcm

Finally nuclear weapons cannot be wished away al la BHO. Nuclear fission is a part of nature (go look at the sun) the technology is not that hard, just detailed and expensive.

Sun works by fusion, not fission.

OTOH, so do our larger bombs.

283 jcm  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:19:31pm

re: #282 itellu3times

Sun works by fusion, not fission.

OTOH, so do our larger bombs.

OR dope slapped me, I deserved it to!

284 Steffan  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:28:07pm

re: #101 Kulhwch

So we've totally disbanded the CIA sniper program?

}:P     [Shoot, where's Bob Lee Swagger when you need him?]

Either Ford or Carter, more likely Carter, signed an executive order banning political assassinations.

All it needs is another executive order to rescind it. I don't know if Bush would sign it (Obama certainly wouldn't), but McCain would likely sign it in a heartbeat.

285 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:42:16pm

re: #252 Sol Roth

Then why do we maintain over 9,000 warheads and a triad of delivery systems?

Peace means stability. Disarmament and fewer nuclear weapons invites an attempt to preempt and decapitate with a first strike. If you are going to have nuclear weapons it is much safer to have many of them in widely separated locations and using multiple delivery systems. The only argument in favor of having fewer weapons and systems is the supposed risk of accidental launch by a deranged officer (Dr Strangelove's General Ripper) or through a system malfunction (Fail Safe.) Neither is credible in the case of the United States.

286 SFGoth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:44:03pm

Is the difference in quality between our militaries, whether you factor in ME fatigue or not, *that* stark? Has American know-how and capitalism so given us an advantage in modern, hi-tech warfare that but for nukes we could slaughter the Russian military? Wow.

287 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:45:47pm

If Putin wants to go down fighting we face Russia, Serbia and Iran and maybe Syria against anyone who wants to come to the party. China would hopefully wait and then pick up some pieces at the end.

288 SFGoth  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 12:45:55pm

re: #282 itellu3times
re: #264 jcm

Finally nuclear weapons cannot be wished away al la BHO. Nuclear fission is a part of nature (go look at the sun) the technology is not that hard, just detailed and expensive.

Sun works by fusion, not fission.

OTOH, so do our larger bombs.


-------
Yikes! Thankgod the sun doesn't work by fission! Hey, wonder if we can grab Russia's tokamak reactor. That's the closest thing there is to artificial fusion.

289 Steffan  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:01:17pm

re: #147 realwest

Hey all y'all - asking a question I asked on the Dead Thread before I had to leave:
Has anyone seen those US Navy Ships with the Humanitarian Aid we're suposed to be sending to Georgia?
Matter of fact, has anyone seen the US Navy anywhere, and in particular any of its TEN Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups?

George Washington is in San Diego getting some fire damage fixed (idiot sailors will insist on their nicotine habits). Kitty Hawk, the oldest ship in the active fleet and the last non-nuclear-powered carrier, is on her way to her home port to be decommissioned -- her air wing just transferred to the Washington. I've heard a rumor that we might end up selling her to India, which beats the heck out of selling her for scrap to a country that still does foundry work.

Most of the rest are somewhere out on the water. Last I heard, there are at least two somewhere near the Persian Gulf. Precisely where, they won't tell you.

Incidentally, selling KH to India would do interesting things to the balance of power in that part of the world. India is already the superpower in that part of the world, and KH is a better and potentially more powerful ship (assuming they have the planes and pilots to properly man her) than anyone else in the hemisphere will have.

As for humanitarian aid, I'd be very surprised if they didn't send at least one hospital ship to the area. Not even the Black Sea Fleet would dare to shoot at a ship with red crosses all over it. Currently, Comfort is in Peru and Mercy is in Papua New Guinea.

290 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:13:48pm

re: #289 Steffan

Who else is in overhaul or in the Reftra cycle? Doubt we really have more than 6 decks rapidly deployable world wide now. Need 2 in Westpac, 2 in the Persian Gulf/Arabian Sea, 2 in the Atlantic/Mediterannean. The Lehman Navy dream was 15 commissioned carriers = 3 CBGs doing multi deck ops north of the Kolmya if we had to hit the Soviets.

291 lostlakehiker  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:20:55pm

The way to wear the diamond down? Diamonds don't scratch. You wear the stick down.

In more concrete terms, the Russians have inserted a large force into terrain that is going to have harsh weather this winter. The best achievable diplomatic outcome for all this would be that the Russians would decamp, and things go back to the status quo ante. That costs the Russians essentially nothing, and it lets them claim, with some truth, that they've taught Georgia a lesson.

If the Russians aren't willing to take this marginal victory and put it in the bank, then they face a problem. Going forward militarily and taking Tbilisi carries, or should carry, a shockingly high diplomatic and economic price. Sitting tight and trying to slowly starve Georgia out is a strategy that can be frustrated by U.S. economic and diplomatic support for Georgia, assuming the Georgians care enough to gut it out and bear the pain it will cost them.

So, what happens? The Russian Army sits there dug in overlooking Tbilisi at Gori, and in Abkhazia. Trucks trundle back and forth over icy mountain roads, bringing up stale food and probably yet staler ammo. Consumption is low, but the Russians will have to fire registration rounds and practice some. Russian soldiers' love lives suffer, and so do the local women, when the Russians try to fix that. They look a mix of evil and ridiculous, camped out up the tail end of nowhere, bored silly and frustrated. Meanwhile, the U.S. loses an occasional airlift plane to bad weather, or some trucks heading across from Turkey. It's a new Berlin airlift, and we know how that ended.

292 jorline  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:23:15pm

How to Wear Down a Bear...make a rug out of him.

293 lostlakehiker  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:32:20pm

re: #285 lifeofthemind

Peace means stability. Disarmament and fewer nuclear weapons invites an attempt to preempt and decapitate with a first strike. If you are going to have nuclear weapons it is much safer to have many of them in widely separated locations and using multiple delivery systems. The only argument in favor of having fewer weapons and systems is the supposed risk of accidental launch by a deranged officer (Dr Strangelove's General Ripper) or through a system malfunction (Fail Safe.) Neither is credible in the case of the United States.

Command malfunction can happen at the very highest levels. During the Cuban missile crisis, Khrushchev ordered a nuclear attack. His officers blanched. He asked, but we win handily. What's the problem?

And they answered, well, err, not exactly. Officers do not advance by giving bad news to Party officials, and there are drawbacks we haven't wanted to bring up.

Like what?

Like, they actually have more nukes than we do, and theirs are more accurate and reliable. The Rodina would be devastated, and whether the United States survived or not would be beside the point. You cannot order this attack.

Having many weapons on both sides makes preemption and decapitation less impossible. If both sides had 100 000 weapons, a first strike would stand some chance of overwhelming command and control on the other side and utterly destroying the victim. If both sides have 1000 weapons, such a strike is impossible, though a very damaging strike would remain possible.

Provided the arms reductions are reciprocal and verifiable, both sides are safer with less. Total disarmament is a pipe dream, but 90% disarmament, evenhandedly, is better than having everybody armed to the hilt.

294 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:32:41pm

re: #291 lostlakehiker

They cannot supply 80,000 men over the passes. The tunnel is not open all year and you think that they can do the job over the mule trail in the Summer passes? Ukraine is moving to shut off Russia's ability to use the Black Sea so resupply by sealift is out. There is a single rail line along the coast from Sochi to Abkhazia. If that is inoperable, accidents do happen, the Russians would have to abandon their positions or risk seeing them go down like Paulus at Stalingrad. The Georgians will be hunting them like wolves around a campfire.

295 Steffan  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:43:28pm

re: #287 lifeofthemind

If Putin wants to go down fighting we face Russia, Serbia and Iran and maybe Syria against anyone who wants to come to the party. China would hopefully wait and then pick up some pieces at the end.

I'd give odds that China will move north, basically the same "Northern Resource Area" scenario that Tom Clancy put forward in at least three of his books. In the books the Russians were good guys and the Chinese ultimately failed. In RL, Putin is a maggot and my money would be on the PLA.

296 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:45:14pm

re: #293 lostlakehiker

Sorry but you are quit simply completely wrong. What prevents a first strike is the knowledge of your enemy having a secure second strike. Actually your story indicates that the Soviets knew that and educated Khruschev. A single control system is vulnerable to a first strike at any level of attack. That is why redundancy of command and communications is stabilizing. Up to a point it is even in our interest in assisting our enemy in developing survivable control systems and we certainly want our enemy to have a high level of confidence that they will not have an accidental launch for either reason I gave. We have invested billions in ensuring that everyone including our enemies has confidence that we will not launch by accident and that we will launch when ordered. That knowledge has kept the peace for over 50 years. The system was far safer and more robust when SAC was an independent command. the recent misshipment of live ALCMs shows the importance of constantly stressing the ritualistic need to enforce reliability in these command systems.

297 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:49:11pm

re: #295 Steffan

I'd give odds that China will move north, basically the same "Northern Resource Area" scenario that Tom Clancy put forward in at least three of his books. In the books the Russians were good guys and the Chinese ultimately failed. In RL, Putin is a maggot and my money would be on the PLA.

I agree, I don't like it but I agree. My only hope is that we get a deal in advance that stops them from pushing South towards the South China Sea and the littoral states.

298 Steffan  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 1:56:58pm

re: #290 lifeofthemind

Who else is in overhaul or in the Reftra cycle? Doubt we really have more than 6 decks rapidly deployable world wide now. Need 2 in Westpac, 2 in the Persian Gulf/Arabian Sea, 2 in the Atlantic/Mediterannean. The Lehman Navy dream was 15 commissioned carriers = 3 CBGs doing multi deck ops north of the Kolmya if we had to hit the Soviets.

They admit to having three out on the water, five if you count the Marine Harrier/helo carriers. Lincoln and Peleiu (LHA 5) are with Fifth Fleet in the Persian Gulf. Reagan is "in the Java Sea" and Eisenhower is "in the Atlantic," pretending to be itty bitty dots in huge ponds. Also playing itty bitty dot is Tarawa (LHA 1), "in the Pacific."

The rest, I'd imagine, are in port. Doing what, they don't say.

299 profitsbeard  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 2:17:55pm

EFP's are unbearable.

300 lifeofthemind  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 2:25:35pm

re: #298 Steffan

They admit to having three out on the water, five if you count the Marine Harrier/helo carriers. Lincoln and Peleiu (LHA 5) are with Fifth Fleet in the Persian Gulf. Reagan is "in the Java Sea" and Eisenhower is "in the Atlantic," pretending to be itty bitty dots in huge ponds. Also playing itty bitty dot is Tarawa (LHA 1), "in the Pacific."

The rest, I'd imagine, are in port. Doing what, they don't say.

I do not count the LHA/LHDs as the same as the CVNs. True other countries count them as carriers but that just muddies the analysis. I love the Gator Freighters and wish we had twice as many and real gun fire support but that is not the same as what a CVBG does. So we have only 3 deployed now. First thing to remember is that multideck ops provide outstanding increases in combat power. In other words having 2 carrier decks present gives almost 3 ties the firepower and having 3 operating continuously would be about 8 times as effective as a single flight deck. It is cost effective to have a larger Navy. We got there under Reagan and have stupidly starved ourselves and pissed the money away ever since. The other carriers are either in overhaul, in training and work up before their deployment cycle or in the case of the Kitty Hawk preparing for decommissioning.

301 Drider  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 2:31:14pm

As it stands right now, I don't see the Russians being able to leave the Georgia under these conditions, to do so would be a massive blunder on the Rooskies part.

Let us tale a look at what has transpired.

Russia invades Georgia....rapes,murders and pillages the countryside.
In doing so they got western Europe's short memories thinking that the bear is back, the Rooskies defiantly come off looking stronger in this regard due to the feeble words of the Euros but still...the Euros need to plan on what eventualities may come to pass in the future.

The media propaganda war was decisively a USA win, Russia may as well be the Soviets of the 60's in everyones minds regardless of what Pooty Poots intentions were...which we all is rotten but the entire free world know this too and aren't buying his "protecting the peace keeper" garbage.

There is no change in Georgian leadership of which the Rooskies continually blathered about.

The Georgians remain a democratically elected government and even though severely weakened, it isn't what Russia wants.

The Georgians remain in full control of the oil pipeline which has really chaffed Pooty's ass since it was constructed.

The USA finally got the missile defense shield agreement signed in Poland, whereas this doesn't effect Russians missiles so much as it does Russians sex partners....the Iranians....thank you soooo, so much Pooty poot.

The obvious downside is that our friends the Georgians have been put through the ringer and without starting world war three, there wasn't much that any same person could do except make a silk purse out of a sows ear...which is what we did.

Russia at this point would be absolute fools to leave the battlefield and come away with "nothing" and yet losing much....Let us hope they do.

302 Perplexed  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 2:44:40pm

Wear down the Bear? Alcohol, drugs, and sex. Lots of the first two and a little of the third.

303 Josephine  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 2:45:06pm

re: #194 reine.de.tout

Thanks for the info.
But . . . you don't eat real food?

LOL, sorry I'm reading this so late, Reine.

I have Celiac Disease and a lot of (real) food allergies. I can't eat at most restaurants or even at other people's homes. I can eat New York Fries, though, so the food courts in some malls aren't too bad for me. It's nice to be able to eat what other people are eating.

304 Perplexed  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 2:59:59pm

re: #280 Occasional Reader

It's all explained here.

I worked for a now defunct defense contractor. On one project the password for our group was BENDOVER. A secretary had to access the account to put together a rather large document. She asked for the password and I told her. She blushed. I said, "no the password really is BENDOVER."

305 RobCon  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 3:00:22pm

Time for the Georgian Triangle. Let Russians eat IEDs for a change.

306 Syrah  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 3:21:30pm

Guerrilla action.

The Russian's can only a afford this if no one offers them any serious resistance.

If this is made expensive enough for them, it could break their spirit.

307 Dr. Shalit  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 3:52:32pm

re: #26 Shane

Easy and cheap would be to hire Blackwater. They are an independent firm with no boarders and they are battle hardened. They will aquire the weapons they need and they will clean up the Russian irregulars. They aren't paid by the United States but Georgia, so they are Georgian fighters by definition.

"Shane'" -

Whether Blackwater or similar 'condottiere' - good plan. Truthfully, as with the Afghan Misadventure of the 1980's - I feel sorry for the poor Russian Conscripts. Their nation owed them better.

-S-

308 Dr. Shalit  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 3:56:46pm

re: #305 RobCon

Time for the Georgian Triangle. Let Russians eat IEDs for a change.

"R-C" -

See my #307. Thanks.

-S-

309 SpiritOf1683  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 4:24:55pm

Remember Ronald Reagan describing the Soviet Union as the empire of evil back in the 1980s? Those words still ring true today, and what a pity there are no Ronald Reagans around today. The truncated Soviet Union otherwise known as Russia has now threatened to murder 40 million Poles. Putin has out-Ahmadinejadded Ahmadinejad himself. But Poland is no stranger to Russian hostility. Three times it has been partitioned out of existence with the Russians beneficiaries - in 1772, 1815 and more odiously 1939 as the condition of the Soviet Union-Nazi Germany Non-Aggression Pact - a pact Churchill described in the terms "This could only have been dreamed up by two odious dictators", and only one week after the Non-Aggression pact, Poland was invaded, and on 17th September 1939, the Soviet Union stabbed Poland in the back and occupied Eastern Poland. And if that wasn't enough, the Russians executed several thousand Polish prisoners and buried them in mass graves near Katyn, which were discovered by the Germans in 1943. And in the winter of 1939-40, they invaded Finland using the pretext "Finlands three million population is a threat to our 180 million". Of course, the invasion of Finland was no cakewalk, and the Soviets won, despite losing 250,000 troops.

Everything Reagan said about the Russians is true. They are barbaric. They subjugated Eastern Europeans to 44 years of imprisonment behind the Iron Curtain, and when these same Eastern Europeans wanted freedom, we saw the same brutal results in Budapest in 1956 and Prague in 1968. And we can see that 52 and 40 years on respectively, nothing has changed about the Russians. Just as the leopard doesn't change its spots, the Russian bear remains a mortal threat to all around it. But what else can be expected from a country that has been run by a succession of diabolical tyrants from 1917 onwards - tyrants who have been responsible for the murders of 70 million plus. If Hell exists, it must be choc-a-block with Russians, and you can bet there will be reserved tags in that hothouse inscribed with the names of the present Russian leadership. They'll certainly deserve it.

/do I qualify for my polonium?

310 kevinmumaw  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 4:33:41pm

re: #48 Killgore Trout

Koskidz love Russian propaganda....
Pravda editorial GOES OFF on Bush regarding Ossetia/Georgia

Progressive!

There is a reason independent journalists are an endangered species in Russia. Stray from the Kremlin line, get shot. Of course Kos loves Hye-Pravda, they fall neatly in line with David Duke and Pat Buchanan.

311 Dr. Shalit  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 4:49:47pm

re: #55 galloping granny

They really are holding up PRAVDA as something truthful and admirable? Ye gods and little fishes. . . . .

"g-g" -

"There is NO PRAVDA in IZVESTIA - and vice versa. This was so in the Soviet Era - as it is today. "Que Lastima!"

=S=

312 kevinmumaw  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 4:53:49pm

re: #311 Dr. Shalit

Now truth in news and now news in truth? Funny.

313 kevinmumaw  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 4:54:27pm

/PIMF

No truth in news and no news in truth.

314 Dr. Shalit  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 4:58:14pm

re: #313 kevinmumaw

/PIMF

No truth in news and no news in truth.

"kev" -

Yup - Zackly!

-S-

315 Bill K.  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:23:19pm

There has been much blather in the MSM of late about how the United States is so tied down with its military obligations in Iraq and Afghanistan that it could not respond to the Russians in Georgia even if it wanted to. But this is an argument that cuts both ways.

The definitely inferior Russian army is now tied down in Georgia while U.S. military operations are winding down in Iraq. Some soldiers there are grousing, good naturedly, that they don't have anyone to fight any longer. However to the east there is an enemy waiting to be vanquished: Iran.

Collapsing Iran, ousting the mullahs and destroying their nuclear program would eradicate the threat of Islamic militancy that has plagued us for thirty years. This victory would start the domino effect that would see the collapse of Iran's minions in Syria, Lebanon and Gaza. It would also be a major blow to Russia's ambitions in the Mideast. Russia would be left without a proxy to confront the benevolent presence of the United States and Israel.

In essence, the Mideast would become a U.S. protectorate, tensions would diminish and the price of oil would stabilize and most likely drop. A lot of Russia's wealth depends on the high priced oil bubble. Money for foreign military adventures would dry up too.

With a closet pacifist as Secretary of Defense, an inveterate appeaser as Secretary of State and a President who continues to heed their advice, I don't expect this Administration to take advantage of the strategic windfall resulting from the Ruskie's misadventure in Georgia.

316 Rides A Pale Horse  Sat, Aug 16, 2008 10:38:47pm

Ok..........real late to this thread but, there was a man that saw all this coming 60 odd years ago.

Patton was right

317 nightwatch  Sun, Aug 17, 2008 12:56:14am

dubbaya oh Wha Wha......pant


Ya folks got to get the CLEAR THINKIN GOIN! THINK BEAR !, with a sickle and a hammer! PUUUUUTIN KGB, PUTIN, KGB. What do you mental midgets not GET? Flowers n pretty waving hands, flowers and the pretty waving hands in the shape of the "O" my GOD, you must be jerking my chain selling me out to the MARXISTS...please tell me this is just another SNL skit.......I'll laugh....I swear I'LL laugh but the "O"
is just another whole to the bottom of the pit.....

318 Nemesis6  Sun, Aug 17, 2008 2:42:54am

So, the Russians have targeted civilian infrastructure, lie about it, target the press at all opportunities(airstrikes, attacking their convoys, etc), and the Ossetians are lynching any soldiers they can find.

Ossetians, Georgians, Russians... They deserve each other so much. Frickin' maniacs the whole lot of them.

319 Nemesis6  Sun, Aug 17, 2008 2:48:33am

By the way, you simply cannot wear down the Russian military. They already suck, but if they face actual resistance, they'll level civilian infrastructure until their enemy submits. Soviet doctrine; It works, although in a horrible, horrible way.

320 Winston Y. Smith  Sun, Aug 17, 2008 8:07:32am

This country has already done that once. In Afghanistan. Now we bear the consequences from effectively having raised a confidence level of more vicious uncompromising enemy: 9/11, Iraq war, depression.

If their current kgb looter rulers fail, their army may come to power with perhaps more aggressive stance, if their army fails their Nazi may came comes to power, a doomsday scenario.

What we Americans should be doing instead, is changing _OUR_ system, not electing joe/jane six packs and spineless bottom feeders, to engage in pissing contest with their fellow Russian joe six packs, and bottom feeders, but to cultivate some willing to listen adults on their side, so they have a chance to become the allies, instead of attention disorder patients with a finger on a big trigger. We need their military as much as any other military out there to help in the coming religious wars, that they are going to be affected as well. But for that we need to look at our corrupt 'system' of electing bottom feeders as judges, weirdos as presidents and grafters as lawmakers. They simply noticed our double standards and boo at us.

321 Cali White Bear  Sun, Aug 17, 2008 2:18:42pm

Interrogative: If Cold War II turns hot in the next few years,
Putin is still on top, etc., and god forbid Putin orders a tactical nuke somewhere against lets say, Ukraine or Georgia or Kazakstan, does the USA or the West nuke Russia?

I say no. The West would not nuke Russia if Russia uses limited tactical nukes against a former Soviet satellite.

Answer below. show your work.

322 HalfBlind  Mon, Aug 18, 2008 7:09:57pm

When they choose to, Russians can endure amazing levels of pain and suffering. Remember Stalingrad and WWII in general. Their defeat in Afgahnistan was something of a special case: they were not fighting in/for Russia and the Soviet regime had by then lost most of its legitimacy. These may be factors in this situation as well, but not as strongly as in Afgahnistan. Lets hope the Russians make the right choice.

323 Blue Chip  Tue, Aug 19, 2008 6:17:13pm

test


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Militarized theocratic sheep police.


Free Shipping  and up to 30% savings on new Textbooks