NYT hits bottom, digs.

But remember, the Obama children have been declared out of bounds (rightly so).

If the press thinks attacking little babies is going to help 0bama, they've got another thing coming. Keep working it, msm. Blowback's a bitch.

So what? NYT has no credibility.

Wow a thread all to my lonesome.

Bwahhahaha, Now I'm in control.

This is the expose' : Trig has more executive experience than Obama

What'd the baby do wrong now?

Incredibly stupid. But that's the Times for you.

One of the creepiest headlines I think I've ever seen. The kid is barely 5 months old and the NY Times is doing an expose on him? On what...his forumla? Diapers? This sounds pathetic.

well, he almost does have as rich of a resume as Obama.

I love the smell of desperation in the morning.

WTF?

It drools and poops. What's more to expose? It's a baby!

The NY Times: All the news that's not worth wrapping an old diaper in.

When do we start getting National Enquirer headlines on the Times? Like "Palin's baby's father is an alien"
/only the headline is sarc

What could they possibly say about a baby?

This just in -- Trig isn't even toilet trained yet! And I hear he still drinks from a bottle.

re: #6 Shug

This is the expose' : Trig has more executive experience than Obama

But 0bama produces more shit. Because he's larger.

The New York Slimes -- what's new? The media will just be humiliated and discredited again if they attempt to smear Palin.

This is good news.

You gotta' be shitting me. Me thinks the NYT deserves the same...Let's check on some of THEIR babies.

re: #13 Killgore Trout

It drools and poops. What's more to expose? It's a baby!

Those little giggles, what's he gigglin at?

Now that Palin will be appearing with Charlie Gibson, does Andrew Sullivan get the first interview with baby Trig?

Trig will buckle and cry under pressure from foreign leaders

Will Obama fire the New York Times now?

good news. this will only help Palin. my god - the backlash against the MSM is gonna be immense.

Well the NYT and others left it to bottom feeding National Enquirer to out Edwards affair, so it is unsurprising the NYT is leading the charge against Palin. The lib MSM are running scared and will probably get themselves into a worse credibility rating that is like at 25 percent.

re: #21 JammieWearingFool

Now that Palin will be appearing with Charlie Gibson, does Andrew Sullivan get the first interview with baby Trig?

No, Trig is way beyond Sullivan in cognitive think/reason.

I wonder if somehow they will me able to link downs syndrome, global warming I mean "Climate Change" and George Bush/Republicans as the cause.

Seriously, though, what it probably is is a repetition of the ugly smears from last weekend, repackaged as "analysis."

Even Trig knows that Bill Ayers is evil.

re: #20 sngnsgt

Ha!

Maybe it is a supportive "puff" piece.

NOT!

The old gray cranky grandma.

Could any of us have imagined just a few months ago that the issue the left & msm would try to drag out to tip the race in favor of 0bama would be a 5 month old Down syndrome baby? WTF is wrong with these people?!

Later they'll sit around the newsroom wondering why everyone hates them.

I didn't think anyone could dig their way to hell but apparently NYT wants to prove me wrong. Say hello to Leni Riefenstahl and Dr. Joseph Goebbels when you breach the gates.

Trig has a boob fixation.

What does "front" mean?

Trig advocates the same failed Bush policies!

re: #9 Sizzlack

They will compare the shit he produces to the shit 0bama produces on the American public and be forced to conclude that the kid's shit is of higher quality.

More seriously, I expect unsubstantiated "revelations" that Palin considered an abortion. Unfortunately for 0bama, that is the wrong thing to say. It says that this lady has had the choice that has faced many, many women in their lives and then decided to have the child on the strength of her beliefs and character.

re: #7 jemima

What'd the baby do wrong now?

Hypocrisy. I hear he uses that snooty name-brand Johnson's Baby Powder... not the generic.

/no more "regular American" for you!

This might very well be the death knell for the New York Slimes.

re: #34 JammieWearingFool

Later they'll sit around the newsroom wondering why everyone hates them.

They're all racists!

New York Slimes Headline: Trig -- the Palin's Secret Animatronic Creation.

re: #37 snowcrash

What does "front" mean?

It means they are publishing somebody else's filth.

re: #37 snowcrash

What does "front" mean?

Front page.

It would be a bad thing to suggest parents who are pissed off at the NYT to send them used diapers.

".....asked about his thoughts on global warming, Trig belched dismissively, rolled over, and went to sleep; dodging the question completely."

re: #46 MandyManners

It would be a bad thing to suggest parents who are pissed off at the NYT to send them used diapers.

Especially since it will be some poor guy in the mailroom who opens it.

I already saw this story in "The Star" last week - the father is really Bigfoot. No wonder the NYT is slipping, their super-credible sources have all gone to work for the UFO chasers.

re: #36 Metal Man

Trig has a boob fixation.

So do I, what's that got to do with anything?

re: #46 MandyManners

It would be a bad thing to suggest parents who are pissed off at the NYT to send them used diapers.

C.O.D

re: #46 MandyManners

It would be a bad thing to suggest parents who are pissed off at the NYT to send them used diapers.

I really like the way your mind works.

Any chance it means Bristol Palin's baby? Not that that's much better...

Oh, wait, it can't--it's not a baby until it's born.

re: #46 MandyManners

It would be a bad thing to suggest parents who are pissed off at the NYT to send them used diapers.

Only if you over spend and sent it fedex.

Probably an in-depth, cutting, searing analysis of her birth control methods or lack there of and what will this mean to legions of over-40 moms for generations to come?

/I can see it now.......

Word has it Trig briefly considered joining the Alaska Independence Party but now is registered independent.

He also reportedly gurgled a noise that curiously sounded like Sambo, according to insiders at some Alaska diner.

Just talked to my left leaning Auntie. She's not voting for 0bama (yeah!) although she's not committed to McCain (yet). However- she said she's not sure about Sarah Palin, but she too thinks the media has been out of line attacking her family. This is what the media just isn't grasping- regular Americans just find this tactic disgusting.

Keep pushing it msm- the more you tighten your grasp, the more readers/viewers slip through your fingers.

It's a strange world we live in - bears are protected species but (republican candidates' children are fair game.

The hypocrisy and the sheer amount of venom and vileness to which liberals are capable of in their hour of despair never stops to amaze me.
They are breaching all borders of common scene and decency with their attacks on Palin. This is sad.

I hope this wil make people see them for what they are.

re: #54 Nevergiveup

Only if you over spend and sent it fedex.

Sometimes humor is expensive.

Which one? Gov. Palin's baby with Down's syndrome or her daughter's pregnancy? Suggesting that the first must have been aborted is called taking the point of view of eugenics. Poking their noses into the second is called none of their damn business. Either way -- real classy, NYT!

By the way, I am not much of a pro-lifer (sorry), but unless you live in Red China, there are certain questions that are for a family to decide, with advice from the religious authority of its choice, if applicable.

This makes my skin crawl. They're so desperate they see nothing wrong in doing an expose on an infant.

It was gonna be a big National Enquirer scoop before the NYT stole it:

"Saint Sarah Palin adopted John Edwards' Mistress' Downs Syndrome Baby!"

re: #17 Kosh's Shadow

But 0bama produces more shit. Because he's larger.

For other reasons too.

What a bunch of disgusting scumballs at the NYT

Baby Laughing

Karl Rove, you magnificent bastard, you're behind this, right?

Seriously what could it be?

1. Trig is actually Bristol's child, and Sarah is covering up for her.

Nope, been debunked already.

2. Sarah Palin screwed around and the baby is not her husband's, but some other man's.

Then it wouldn't be described as an exposé about the baby, but on Sarah personally.

3. She should have done the "responsible" thing and aborted it because it was disabled.

That's not an "exposé," that's a philosophical and moral discussion.

4. Sarah's not paying enough attention to it, because she's so busy with politics.

Pathetic anti-feminist smear.

5. ....

Help me out here!

re: #7 jemima

Was born to a Republican VP nominee. For some people that's a good enough justification for infanticide.

When the NYT out-National-Enquirers the National Enquirer, it's time to rename the paper to its only truly useful function:

The New York Birdcage Liner

Let them fill their pages with crap honestly for a change.

Don't tell me... anonymous sources? Thought so.

NYT meet Dan Rather. The same fate awaits.

I heard the exposé is going to be that when the baby is hungry- he cries. They indulge this behavior by feeding him when he does it too, thus reinforcing Trig's behavior. Shocking!

re: #57 Sharmuta

Just talked to my left leaning Auntie. She's not voting for 0bama (yeah!) although she's not committed to McCain (yet). However- she said she's not sure about Sarah Palin, but she too thinks the media has been out of line attacking her family. This is what the media just isn't grasping- regular Americans just find this tactic disgusting.

Keep pushing it msm- the more you tighten your grasp, the more readers/viewers/voters slip through your fingers.

There, fixed that for ya.

The RICO case Guiliani has when he is sworn in as DoJ... Going to be big as hell. A lot of asshats are going to prison over all this.

This is starting to feel like extortion. "Drop out or we'll keep picking on your family."

At least it'll keep "Obie" out of the limelight!

re: #74 livefreeor die

This is starting to feel like extortion. "Drop out or we'll keep picking on your family."

I think there's enough love and strength in the Palin family to see this through to the end.

re: #10 spidly

well, he almost does have as rich of a resume as Obama.

Trig's resume is much better than Obama's - I mean he's such a cute baby...

re: #56 JammieWearingFool

Word has it Trig briefly considered joining the Alaska Independence Party but now is registered independent.

He also reportedly gurgled a noise that curiously sounded like Sambo, according to insiders at some Alaska diner.

Innocent until proven guilty. Have they got it on tape?

re: #67 zombie

Seriously what could it be?

1. Trig is actually Bristol's child, and Sarah is covering up for her.

Nope, been debunked already.

2. Sarah Palin screwed around and the baby is not her husband's, but some other man's.

Then it wouldn't be described as an exposé about the baby, but on Sarah personally.

3. She should have done the "responsible" thing and aborted it because it was disabled.

That's not an "exposé," that's a philosophical and moral discussion.

4. Sarah's not paying enough attention to it, because she's so busy with politics.

Pathetic anti-feminist smear.

5. ....

Help me out here!

The only thing I can think of is that they seriouly considered an abortion. Not that, that is anyone's buiseness but their own, and they ended up having the baby. IF they even ever did consider an abortion.

One guess of what their slime story might be:

1). Todd's not the father. It's Todd's ex-business partner mentioned in the "National Enquirer" as Sarah's supposed one-time lover. The NYT is suddenly a big believer in the NE's journalistic integrity. Girls, if you had Todd at home, would you stray?

re: #74 livefreeor die

This is starting to feel like extortion. "Drop out or we'll keep picking on your family."

Everything the dems do is extortion. Look at how they threaten companies with higher taxes, punish success, threaten Seniors about SS, they are the Extortion Party.

re: #74 livefreeor die

This is starting to feel like extortion. "Drop out or we'll keep picking on your family."

"Hey, that's a nice campaign you got there. I'd sure be a shame..."

re: #55 Claire

Probably an in-depth, cutting, searing analysis of her birth control methods or lack there of and what will this mean to legions of over-40 moms for generations to come?

/I can see it now.......

5. Sarah Palin is a "hypocrite" because she encourages abstinence education, while she and her family f*ck like bunnies?

No way, the N.Y. Times would not sink that low.

re: #35 Idle Drifter

I didn't think anyone could dig their way to hell but apparently NYT wants to prove me wrong. Say hello to Leni Riefenstahl and Dr. Joseph Goebbels when you breach the gates.

They don't have to dig their way in, or storm the gates. They have a standing dinner invitation from Satan.

Trig refuses to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan.

this is on the front page of digg

apparently john mccain never talked about jobs or healthcare , according to biden.

well duh - maybe thats because the free market and NOT the government creates job. and because the american people dont want washington d.c. to run the health system.

re: #76 goddessoftheclassroom

I think there's enough love and strength in the Palin family to see this through to the end.

I agree. The press slimes have no understanding of the power of those qualities.

re: #80 sagamoregal

One guess of what their slime story might be:

1). Todd's not the father. It's Todd's ex-business partner mentioned in the "National Enquirer" as Sarah's supposed one-time lover. The NYT is suddenly a big believer in the NE's journalistic integrity. Girls, if you had Todd at home, would you stray?

It's just so silly.

Obama Wan Barobi; You're my only hope for change!

/

Just so that I get this straight. None of the MSM would report Obama's many shady acquaintances such Rezo, or Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers and still suppress those stories. But now the Times wants to put out a "hit piece" on Palin and her baby?
/they are nuts! And this is the finest newspaper in the country?

re: #90 LoFlyer

Just so that I get this straight. None of the MSM would report Obama's many shady acquaintances such Rezo, or Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers and still suppress those stories. But now the Times wants to put out a "hit piece" on Palin and her baby?
/they are nuts! And this is the finest newspaper in the country?

They were at one time. Not any more.

re: #89 Salamantis

Obama Wan Barobi; You're my only hope for change!

/

Use the schwartz!

re: #90 LoFlyer

indeed. where the hell is the bill ayers expose?

When are we gonna see the hard-hitting investigative piece about Barak Obama repeatedly exposing his two young daughters to pulpit-purveyed hate?

Maybe the Slimes should first check out how well this approach is working for other rags. Google "USmagazine subscription cancellations".

re: #79 Nevergiveup

The only thing I can think of is that they seriouly considered an abortion. Not that, that is anyone's buiseness but their own, and they ended up having the baby. IF they even ever did consider an abortion.

Ah yes the old thought crime argument. Most people will realize it is irrelevant if they thought about it, in the end they did not abort the baby. I have thought plenty of things contradictory to my beliefs yet never went through with them. Now I'm guilty simply for thinking them? If that is the Times angle that is really sad.

So are they gonna dis everybody that has a Downs/Autistic/Disabled child? Or are they gonna dis every teenage mother in America? These people, the NYSlimes that is, are evil.

re: #57 Sharmuta

Just talked to my left leaning Auntie. She's not voting for 0bama (yeah!) although she's not committed to McCain (yet). However- she said she's not sure about Sarah Palin, but she too thinks the media has been out of line attacking her family. This is what the media just isn't grasping- regular Americans just find this tactic disgusting.

Keep pushing it msm- the more you tighten your grasp, the more readers/viewers slip through your fingers.

Yup. There is a lot more to America other than Chicago and LA and most of us find this kind of "politics" WAY over the line.

Frankly, I suspect we're going to see more than a few vote for McCain-Palin just on the premise that they don't like the way the other team plays.

Tomorrow's headline:

"NYT find baby, kicks it"

re: #93 buzzdroid

indeed. where the hell is the bill ayers expose?

It is being readied for a Nov 5th publication date.

re: #16 doppelganglander

This just in -- Trig isn't even toilet trained yet! And I hear he still drinks from a bottle.

Rather, "PALIN SON SEEN HITTING THE BOTTLE!"

re: #86 buzzdroid

this is on the front page of digg

[Link: ca.youtube.com...]

apparently john mccain never talked about jobs or healthcare , according to biden.

well duh - maybe thats because the free market and NOT the government creates job. and because the american people dont want washington d.c. to run the health system.

Except John McCain did talk about jobs. I distinctly remember a discussion about job retraining - and this is verified by reading NRO where they are not in favor. And I thought he talked about jobs in relation to his energy policy?

re: #67 zombie

5. ....

Help me out here!

He's faking his Down's Syndrome, with an eye toward those big, future disability checks?

Drudge does have the habit of posting headlines that don't always match the story. It sounds as if some independent source is going to write some kind of story about Palin's pregnancy, and the Times is going to print it. "Expose'" might just be Drudge's goofy term. I mean, the guy thinks he's Walter Winchell.

Given that marital fidelity is not valued by many of the senor editors of the N.Y. Times, and that most of the staff is gay, it's no surprise that they'd think that Palin's baby is what their readers should focus on!

You suppose they're doing this so Obama can come off looking like a hero when he calls for them to stop?

The NYT is staffed by a bunch of bottom feeders. Maybe, if we are lucky, baby Trig can have a poopy diaper for them.

It's despicable!
/daffy duck

re: #80 sagamoregal

One guess of what their slime story might be:

1). Todd's not the father. It's Todd's ex-business partner mentioned in the "National Enquirer" as Sarah's supposed one-time lover. The NYT is suddenly a big believer in the NE's journalistic integrity. Girls, if you had Todd at home, would you stray?

Does it really matter if she did? After all, the last Democrat that we had in office screwed an intern on the historic desk in the Oval Office.

I don't know if anybody linked this quote yet:

You must understand printing lies about Republican candidates is OK. It’s called “vetting.”
Printing the truth about liberals - that’s called “swift-boating.”

It's from Howie Carr of the BostonHerald

re: #80 sagamoregal

One guess of what their slime story might be:

1). Girls, if you had Todd at home, would you stray?

Oh, heck no! Maybe it's about Todd's business partner's divorce. That's already been debunked, too. Whatever it is, the dead tree media is always a day or two behind.

The leftist media is completely outmatched this time.
These bullies are used to smearing people, ruining their credibility with false reports, threats, and relentless smears.

leftist media : you've met your match.

Remember what Admiral Yamamoto said after Pearl Harbor : I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve

Governor Palin will not be bullied by attacking her children.
And there are millions of americans like Me and Mrs Shug who will go to battle for her and for her children because you might as well be attacking our family with your filth.
enough is enough.

This sleeping giant is going to flatten you

Fox is replaying the Greta show on Sarah Palin now....

re: #33 Sharmuta

Could any of us have imagined just a few months ago that the issue the left & msm would try to drag out to tip the race in favor of 0bama would be a 5 month old Down syndrome baby? WTF is wrong with these people?!

Answer: Everything. If they are willing to cross the black (way beyond the red) line of decency it means that they have very little left in common with normal human beings.

When does the on-line edition go up?

re: #106 Noam Sayin'

You suppose they're doing this so Obama can come off looking like a hero when he calls for them to stop?

Good point. They get the smears out and he looks gallant for calling for a stop to them-after they're printed for all to see, of course.

Even they can't be that dumb, or can they? Haven't they noticed the trend --that people are sympathetic towards Palin because of all the media attacks? This is translating into more votes for McCain....shhhh maybe they won't catch on to this until after the election. I think their biggest problem is they just talk to each other and are totally clueless about what real people think of their slime filled journalism.

/bbl computer is very slow today

re: #79 Nevergiveup

The only thing I can think of is that they seriouly considered an abortion. Not that, that is anyone's buiseness but their own, and they ended up having the baby. IF they even ever did consider an abortion.

First the left attacks her for NOT having an abortion, and then they attack her for thinking about HAVING an abortion?

Gee, that's certainly consistent!

I guess the NY TImes think it will infuriate evangelicals, that she considered abortion, but really, the vast majority of mothers with Down's Syndrome babies do have abortions, and are encouraged to do so by their doctors, so that could hardly be considered scandalous. Besides, Palin never declared herself to be perfect. She is human, after all. No one would hold it against her for a moment of wavering.

My daughter was born the same day as Trig Palin. I cannot imagine the anger of Sarah if this is true. Had my 4 month old daughter been used by the NYT in an attempt to score political points, there would be an editor sans testicles, and those testicles would be shoved so far up his ass that his doctor would mistake them for tonsils during his next physical. Is there no depth to which they will not sink? I'll be singing a happy tune the day I hear the NYT is bankrupt.

I hate NYTimes

re: #90 LoFlyer

Just so that I get this straight. None of the MSM would report Obama's many shady acquaintances such Rezo, or Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers and still suppress those stories. But now the Times wants to put out a "hit piece" on Palin and her baby?
/they are nuts! And this is the finest newspaper in the country?

Yes, you appear to have that just exactly right.

re: #93 buzzdroid

indeed. where the hell is the bill ayers expose?

I think Stanley Kurtz is hard at work on it, since he got access to the Chicago Annenberg Challenge records.

3 more points for McCain/Palin...thank you

re: #112 Shug

The leftist media is completely outmatched this time.
These bullies are used to smearing people, ruining their credibility with false reports, threats, and relentless smears.

leftist media : you've met your match.

Remember what Admiral Yamamoto said after Pearl Harbor : I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve

Governor Palin will not be bullied by attacking her children.
And there are millions of americans like Me and Mrs Shug who will go to battle for her and for her children because you might as well be attacking our family with your filth.
enough is enough.

This sleeping giant is going to flatten you

Hear, hear!

re: #106 Noam Sayin'

You suppose they're doing this so Obama can come off looking like a hero when he calls for them to stop?

I like the way you think.

re: #9 Sizzlack

One of the creepiest headlines I think I've ever seen. The kid is barely 5 months old and the NY Times is doing an expose on him? On what...his forumla? Diapers? This sounds pathetic.

5 Months? That might be a reach for the crack research teams at the NYT.

/

I'm not even sure what "front expose" means.

re: #109 galloping granny

Does it really matter if she did? After all, the last Democrat that we had in office screwed an intern on the historic desk in the Oval Office.

I thought they didn't actually do the deed.

Will Drudge put up the flashing light when it's published?

re: #119 schlagerman

My daughter was born the same day as Trig Palin. I cannot imagine the anger of Sarah if this is true. Had my 4 month old daughter been used by the NYT in an attempt to score political points, there would be an editor sans testicles, and those testicles would be shoved so far up his ass that his doctor would mistake them for tonsils during his next physical. Is there no depth to which they will not sink? I'll be singing a happy tune the day I hear the NYT is bankrupt.

I've been wondering for quite some while now why they aren't bankrupt yet.

re: #112 Shug

The leftist media is completely outmatched this time.
These bullies are used to smearing people, ruining their credibility with false reports, threats, and relentless smears.

leftist media : you've met your match.

Remember what Admiral Yamamoto said after Pearl Harbor : I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve

Governor Palin will not be bullied by attacking her children.
And there are millions of americans like Me and Mrs Shug who will go to battle for her and for her children because you might as well be attacking our family with your filth.
enough is enough.

This sleeping giant is going to flatten you

Around here in the Philly suburbs, it seems to be making Republicans stop trying to fly under the radar. They're hopping mad!

The NYT was going to run a story about abortion, but they killed it.

Maybe the Slimes has uncovered evidence that D.S. could be identified before birth, so the result is obviously SARAH's fault.
In a different world, the Slimes would be the subject of a popular uprising involving pitchforks, concertina wire and BBQ pits. Unfortunately, not likely in NYC.

Drudge doesn't exactly have a great track record when it comes to scoops. They float stuff like this on a daily basis, and it only rarely pans out.

There's no point in strategizing against the unknown. I'll believe it when I see it, and I'm strongly inclined to believe there's not going to be anything to see.

For the first time this weekend I heard a fare share of political talk in the Military this weekend. It was mostly about Sarah Palin and was running 95% PRO.

re: #127 laxmatt1984
I think Matt dropped the word 'page'.

re: #103 stevieray

He's faking his Down's Syndrome, with an eye toward those big, future disability checks?

Interesting theory. Not that Trig is faking it, but that Sarah is faking his disability, to get the sympathy vote?

Doubtful. I've seen the baby. It does seem to have the physical characteristics of Down's Syndrome.

re: #127 laxmatt1984

I'm not even sure what "front expose" means.

Think Slimy times reporter , raincoat, subway car

Somehow the attack on the baby has to reflect on poor judgment by Palin. Maybe revisit the poor pre-natal care accusations. Maybe an anonymous waitress saw her have a beer when pregnant. This is a big mistake by the NYT.

OT

I will never watch Sunday Night Football again as long as Keith Olberman (sp?) is a commentator.

/unless Dallas is playing. Does that make me a hypocrite?

re: #104 jimboster

Drudge does have the habit of posting headlines that don't always match the story. It sounds as if some independent source is going to write some kind of story about Palin's pregnancy, and the Times is going to print it. "Expose'" might just be Drudge's goofy term. I mean, the guy thinks he's Walter Winchell.

Hmmmm, interesting. Photos of Palin drinking hard liquor while pregnant?

re: #119 schlagerman

Had my 4 month old daughter been used by the NYT in an attempt to score political points, there would be an editor sans testicles, and those testicles would be shoved so far up his ass that his doctor would mistake them for tonsils during his next physical.

Wow, schlagerman, tell us what you really think!
Major upding!

re: #128 MandyManners

I thought they didn't actually do the deed.

It depends what you mean by the word "sex". Seriously, Billy Jeff gave some distorted explanation of how Lewinsky was having sexual contact but he wasn't or something like that.

re: #127 laxmatt1984

I'm not even sure what "front expose" means.

Just don't do it to strangers.

re: #128 MandyManners

I thought they didn't actually do the deed.

My understanding of the story is that he used a cigar from the Presidential humidor . . . . . . I don't see how that makes a bit of difference. The idea that this is somehow more "correct" is ludicrous.

re: #41 galloping granny

This might very well be the death knell for the New York Slimes.

From your lips to G-d's ear!

re: #67 zombie

One of my moonbat neighbors told me she was volunteering at the local dem headquarters and went on the ask me if I'd heard that baby Trig was actually birthed by one of the Palin daughters. I told her that, yes I'd heard that rumor, but that it had already been debunked. What with Bristol being 5 months pregnant, etc. She then told me, No, not that daughter, the younger one.....

Sigh...These people are the lowest.

re: #140 Reno911

OT

I will never watch Sunday Night Football again as long as Keith Olberman (sp?) is a commentator.

/unless Dallas is playing. Does that make me a hypocrite?

Well you can skip the pre-game show like i do.

IF

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you
But make allowance for their doubting too,
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream--and not make dreams your master,
If you can think--and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breath a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings--nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you;
If all men count with you, but none too much,
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And--which is more--you'll be a Man, my son!

--Rudyard Kipling

re: #132 sngnsgt

*whackwhack*

Meanwhile, as we wait for NYT to step into Trig's dirty diaper, here's bollocks to you

So this is what the Grey Lady has come to? Following in the footsteps of the Enquirer? Where were you on John Edwards? And yes, please keep giving fodder to Hannity as he begs the MSM to investigate Ayers, et al. While your discredited rag is chasing down some yahoo who has a grudge against Palin, the man running on the Dem side of this ticket has no qualms drinking latte with terrorists. How about looking into the 700 page document release about the Woods Foundation? How desperate is the MSM? That is rhetorical of course but I am still more amazed one day after the next.

Trig was actually a twin . His brother,Algebra ,didn't survive the abortion. Trig was able to hide in the closet while BHO chased Algebra down the hall .

re: #141 zombie

Hmmmm, interesting. Photos of Palin drinking hard liquor while pregnant?

I don't think that would cause Downs .

re: #119 schlagerman

My daughter was born the same day as Trig Palin. I cannot imagine the anger of Sarah if this is true. Had my 4 month old daughter been used by the NYT in an attempt to score political points, there would be an editor sans testicles, and those testicles would be shoved so far up his ass that his doctor would mistake them for tonsils during his next physical. Is there no depth to which they will not sink? I'll be singing a happy tune the day I hear the NYT is bankrupt.

A big up-ding for that one!

re: #148 Nevergiveup

Thanks.

Perhaps it is time for the blogs to research and publish our findings on the activities of the family that owns the NYT, specifically sexual affairs, abortions, divorces, drug and alcohol abuse. Stuff like that. See how the owners enjoy the shoe on the other foot.

re: #119 schlagerman

My daughter was born the same day as Trig Palin. I cannot imagine the anger of Sarah if this is true. Had my 4 month old daughter been used by the NYT in an attempt to score political points, there would be an editor sans testicles, and those testicles would be shoved so far up his ass that his doctor would mistake them for tonsils during his next physical. Is there no depth to which they will not sink? I'll be singing a happy tune the day I hear the NYT is bankrupt.

You're assuming they have testicles, and some of them probably would enjoy having things shoved up their asses.

Let me guess: Dan Rather, Mary Mapes, and Bull Burkett are involved.

They have MEMOS.

re: #140 Reno911

OT

I will never watch Sunday Night Football again as long as Keith Olberman (sp?) is a commentator.

/unless Dallas is playing. Does that make me a hypocrite?

You can put your thumb and forefinger in a position where you can squoosh his head. Very amusing.

I'm about to blow a gasket. bbl

re: #9 Sizzlack

One of the creepiest headlines I think I've ever seen. The kid is barely 5 months old and the NY Times is doing an expose on him? On what...his forumla? Diapers? This sounds pathetic.

It's whats in his diaper is what they want to know. I can tell them right now. It's shit

Since the announcement that Palin would be McCain's running mate, liberals and their newspapers have been throwing all sorts of ugly crap at her and her family.

The result: McCain has overtaken Obama in the polls.

So fire away NYT - about the only thing you could say about Palin that would hurt her standing is that she is a closet liberal, and that's not gonna happen.

re: #46 MandyManners

It would be a bad thing to suggest parents who are pissed off at the NYT to send them used diapers.

It would be better than the crap they've been sending out to their (dwindling) subscribers for quite a few years now. And more substantive.

re: #132 sngnsgt

The NYT was going to run a story about abortion, but they killed terminated it.

fixed that for ya

re: #154 Nevergiveup

I don't think that would cause Downs .

So is that the scoop - she drank hard liquor while pregnant?

Maybe all of this over the top crap will trace back to the Clintons - pulling in favors with print/TV editors putting this craziness out there to sink Obama.

Someone needs to visit the NYT with a cluebat..

re: #141 zombie

Hmmmm, interesting. Photos of Palin drinking hard liquor while pregnant?

Unless she is drinking out of the bottle, how can you tell from a picture that she is drinking liquor? And even if she was, alcohol in excess causes fetal alcohol syndrome, not Down's. The two are quite distinct. It would be impossible to confuse them.

re: #82 ErnieG

"Hey, that's a nice campaign you got there. I'd sure be a shame..."

That sort of thing should be left to certain Large Sicilian Gentlemen from Neew Jersey^TM.

re: #147 SummerSong

One of my moonbat neighbors told me she was volunteering at the local dem headquarters and went on the ask me if I'd heard that baby Trig was actually birthed by one of the Palin daughters. I told her that, yes I'd heard that rumor, but that it had already been debunked. What with Bristol being 5 months pregnant, etc. She then told me, No, not that daughter, the younger one.....

Sigh...These people are the lowest.

Ooooooh! That'd be amazing. McCain-Palin would win the election for sure. The entire family are sexoholics! No way Obama could compete with that.

What is the difference between the NY times and a bad of shit?

The bag

re: #147 SummerSong

That's hard to believe- the chances of a teenager having a Down baby vs an 40+ woman having a Down baby- it's crazy.

Anyone feeling bad for Obama now?...poor guy, listened to his handlers, believed the hype...now...the end is nigh!

The New York Slimes, working hard to destroy not only their own reputations but those of every poor soul unfortunate enough to be associated with New York....

re: #169 galloping granny

Unless she is drinking out of the bottle, how can you tell from a picture that she is drinking liquor? And even if she was, alcohol in excess causes fetal alcohol syndrome, not Down's. The two are quite distinct. It would be impossible to confuse them.

It's never impossible to confuse a liberal.

re: #154 Nevergiveup

I don't think that would cause Downs .

I'm not saying it would -- only that the Times would point to it as being a "bad" mother, Downs or no Downs.

re: #171 zombie

Breaking News!

People like sex.

# 153 N in Hi

"Trig was actually a twin . His brother,Algebra ,didn't survive the abortion. Trig was able to hide in the closet while BHO chased Algebra down the hall ."

ROTFLMAO!

re: #147 SummerSong

One of my moonbat neighbors told me she was volunteering at the local dem headquarters and went on the ask me if I'd heard that baby Trig was actually birthed by one of the Palin daughters. I told her that, yes I'd heard that rumor, but that it had already been debunked. What with Bristol being 5 months pregnant, etc. She then told me, No, not that daughter, the younger one.....

Sigh...These people are the lowest.

What sheer, unadulterated filth. And please tell your neighbor for me that this is exactly what she is - filth worse than anything out of a pigsty.

re: #7 jemima

What'd the baby do wrong now?

He was allowed to be born.

re: #83 zombie

5. Sarah Palin is a "hypocrite" because she encourages abstinence education, while she and her family f*ck like bunnies?

No way, the N.Y. Times would not sink that low.

Wanna bet?

re: #112 Shug

And the people will also decide where to get their news based on the quality. If this is the Times front page, they'll be left with the leftist New Yorkers and the wanna-be equivalents in other cities.
And they'll still wonder why their circulation is tanking.

re: #179 sagamoregal

# 153 N in Hi

"Trig was actually a twin . His brother,Algebra ,didn't survive the abortion. Trig was able to hide in the closet while BHO chased Algebra down the hall ."

ROTFLMAO!

Actually they were triplets. Geometry was sold to Tony Rezko in exchange for a summer house in Chicago at well below market value.

Let's see what they end up publishing, but I can't help but think that this decision has to do with the NYT's plunging revenues. I read that it's going to drop entire sections of the paper in a desperate attempt to save money. I suppose that the powers that be think that stories about Palin's baby, or her daughter's baby, or both will sell papers.

After all, neither Obama nor Biden is doing anything worth reading about these days...

re: #163 uptight

Since the announcement that Palin would be McCain's running mate, liberals and their newspapers have been throwing all sorts of ugly crap at her and her family.

The result: McCain has overtaken Obama in the polls.

So fire away NYT - about the only thing you could say about Palin that would hurt her standing is that she is a closet liberal, and that's not gonna happen.

Let's be fair here. Obama got one day of 6+ from his "convention bounce"

re: #117 twincitiesgirl

Even they can't be that dumb, or can they? Haven't they noticed the trend --that people are sympathetic towards Palin because of all the media attacks? This is translating into more votes for McCain....shhhh maybe they won't catch on to this until after the election. I think their biggest problem is they just talk to each other and are totally clueless about what real people think of their slime filled journalism.

/bbl computer is very slow today

Perhaps the lizard who suggested that Soros is paying for all this bad press is right, but I suspect that there is a certain set of curs at the NYT who are like attack-trained dogs. They see a certain kind of person, a conservative or a Republican, and restraint disappears. Instinct takes over and they are off to the chase.

They're going to say that the baby might not be her husbands.

Just my guess.

re: #153 n in wi

Trig was actually a twin . His brother,Algebra ,didn't survive the abortion. Trig was able to hide in the closet while BHO chased Algebra down the hall .

Trig survived because he knew the angles.

Does anyone remember when the New York Times had any respectability? Any respectability at all? Someone enlighten me. Was it always such a filthy rag?

I am reminded of the scene in Titanic where the ship's designer is pulling out the blueprints and informing Captain and crew that the ship's downward plunge is a mathematical and scientific certainty. The NYT has sealed its fate this time. Let them rearrange the deck chairs and polish the door knobs all they want. They are going down to meet Diver Dan Rather.

Wow, I thought you were supposed to stop digging when you find yourself in a hole?

A quick aside:

Sources: Brady out with ACL tear

[Link: sports.yahoo.com...]

GO JETS!

re: #9 Sizzlack

One of the creepiest headlines I think I've ever seen. The kid is barely 5 months old and the NY Times is doing an expose on him? On what...his forumla? Diapers? This sounds pathetic.

They should spend a little more time on baby Barry's red diapers.

Palin's baby? IT WAS BUSH'S FAULT !

(Sheesh. I can't believe after almost 200 comments that I could still use that line! Love you Lizards! )

On NYT bulletin board:Your text to link...

Actually, the scandal is that she had quadruplets:

Al (middle name Gebra)
Trig (middle name Onometry)
Cal (middle name Culus)
Geo (middle name Metry).

re: #190 Master Cranky Hucklebubble

Does anyone remember when the New York Times had any respectability? Any respectability at all? Someone enlighten me. Was it always such a filthy rag?

I am reminded of the scene in Titanic where the ship's designer is pulling out the blueprints and informing Captain and crew that the ship's downward plunge is a mathematical and scientific certainty. The NYT has sealed its fate this time. Let them rearrange the deck chairs and polish the door knobs all they want. They are going down to meet Diver Dan Rather.

We know as the NY Times sinks, no band will be playing "Nearer My G-d to Thee".

re: #191 DesertSage

Wow, I thought you were supposed to stop digging when you find yourself in a hole?

Especially if you DON'T want to find oil?

re: #188 deepthroat

They're going to say that the baby might not be her husbands.

Just my guess.

Probably trying to get those DNA records again. Which are by law not the first damned bit of their business.

re: #196 zombie

I bow to the master.

re: #196 zombie

Actually, the scandal is that she had quadruplets:

Al (middle name Gebra)
Trig (middle name Onometry)
Cal (middle name Culus)
Geo (middle name Metry).

Fuzzy Math

re: #196 zombie

Actually, the scandal is that she had quadruplets:

Al (middle name Gebra)
Trig (middle name Onometry)
Cal (middle name Culus)
Geo (middle name Metry).

Quintuplets!

You left out

Astro Physics Palin

Liberals just can't help themselves - everything they decry about the right they are guilty of engaging in - I really think this is a good sign for McCain/Palin because the Greek Columns are starting to crack. It is like that Star Trek Episode when the Greek God has the Enterprise in his fist yelling "NOOOOO!

maybe:
'Life With A Downs Child'
3 or so families who financially and emotionally cracked under the pressure of caring for a Downs Syndrome child. What challenges the Palins can look forward to?

re: #142 Semper Gumbi

It's my first kid, and every day I look at her in amazement. So helpless, so beautiful, such a blessing. To think that she, or any infant, would be used as a political pawn is disgusting. I have no patience for this type of behavior. However, since this is on Drudge, we need to see if it's actually true.

re: #202 Tigger2005

Quintuplets!

You left out

Astro Physics Palin

That's a branch of Physics, not math!

On NYT bulletin board:

WILL THE LAST ONE OUT PLEASE TURN OUT THE LIGHTS

(Re: 195 - PIMF)

re: #196 zombie

Actually, the scandal is that she had quadruplets:

Al (middle name Gebra)
Trig (middle name Onometry)
Cal (middle name Culus)
Geo (middle name Metry).

don't forget Diffy Q. Palin

re: #206 zombie

That's a branch of Physics, not math!

It's all Greek to me.

re: #197 Kosh's Shadow

We know as the NY Times sinks, no band will be playing "Nearer My G-d to Thee".

It would remind them of the God they hate.

Get me a violin, and I'll scratch that tune just to spite them.

re: #194 yitzy

Palin's baby? IT WAS BUSH'S FAULT !

(Sheesh. I can't believe after almost 200 comments that I could still use that line! Love you Lizards! )

Bush Lied - Trig Cried

re: #190 Master Cranky Hucklebubble

Does anyone remember when the New York Times had any respectability? Any respectability at all? Someone enlighten me. Was it always such a filthy rag?

I am reminded of the scene in Titanic where the ship's designer is pulling out the blueprints and informing Captain and crew that the ship's downward plunge is a mathematical and scientific certainty. The NYT has sealed its fate this time. Let them rearrange the deck chairs and polish the door knobs all they want. They are going down to meet Diver Dan Rather.

The New York Times actually reported that the Titanic sank when the rest of the established media were in denial.

There are real issues in this election, and it's beyond disgusting that the nyt thinks the American people are that concerned about one baby.

Here's a clue nyt- the American people are not concerned with Sarah Palin's baby. They are concerned with their own babies. What are the Presidential candidates going to do to make this a better country for our babies?!

Clue #2- Sarah Palin is not running for President. John McCain and 0bama are.

OK, the fifth child was

Set Theory Palin.

(Named after the Egyptian God Set - - she likes those pagan names.)

*Adjusts Tinfoil Cap*

Theory: A picture and/or suggestion of Palin pulling a Michael Jackson Baby dangling routine?

re: #211 wright1

Bush Lied - Trig Cried

Ha hah hah ha hahh hah aha haaha aha! Excellent.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”
........
........
........
........
........
........

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”
credit.

re: #184 Tigger2005

Actually they were triplets. Geometry was sold to Tony Rezko in exchange for a summer house in Chicago at well below market value.

I love it . Maybe quadruplets?
Trig, Algebra,Geometry, and
Oh well you all beat me to it.

re: #213 Sharmuta

There are real issues in this election, and it's beyond disgusting that the nyt thinks the American people are that concerned about one baby.

Here's a clue nyt- the American people are not concerned with Sarah Palin's baby. They are concerned with their own babies. What are the Presidential candidates going to do to make this a better country for our babies?!

Clue #2- Sarah Palin is not running for President. John McCain and 0bama are.

Yes but the Libs had this thing contained until Palin showed up - she must be DESTROYED

An expose on a baby with Down syndrome?
Nice.
Do these people realize how asinine they look?

re: #214 zombie

OK, the fifth child was

Set Theory Palin.

(Named after the Egyptian God Set - - she likes those pagan names.)

Nah. That was the sixth child. Sextuplets! That makes the scandal even juicier, since it's got a word with "sex" in it.

Is anyone else starting to think that its about time to hold the advertisers of the NY Times responsible for the garbage that they are supporting through their ad buys in that fishwrap?

re: #206 zombie

That's a branch of Physics, not math!

Obligatory XKCD reference.

re: #208 spidly

don't forget Diffy Q. Palin

Yes, but Diffy Q is a Siamese his sister is Annie Q.

re: #214 zombie

and Nul Set

re: #213 Sharmuta

There are real issues in this election, and it's beyond disgusting that the nyt thinks the American people are that concerned about one baby.

Here's a clue nyt- the American people are not concerned with Sarah Palin's baby. They are concerned with their own babies. What are the Presidential candidates going to do to make this a better country for our babies?!

Clue #2- Sarah Palin is not running for President. John McCain and 0bama are.

This actually does raise one of the very real issues in this campaign though Sharm - the overwhelming bias in the media and the outrageous lengths that they will apparently go to in order to interfere with our election process.

re: #225 spidly

and Nul Set

That's the 3rd Obama kid

PALIN'S BABY GOES THROUGH MANY DIAPERS EACH DAY.
CONTRIBUTES TO GLOBAL WARMING, RISE OF OCEANS.

(Just poop?)

Maybe she was running a brothel out of the governor's mansion. Oh wait, that was Barney Frank (D).

You're all missing the rationale behind all of these gratuitous media attacks; the media are trying to see if they can make Sarah Palin publicly cry.

1) If she does, she's a fragile overwrought emotional flower who lacks the inner strength and resilience to be a Heartbeat from the Presidency of our nation in these Critical Times (and these times are indeed critical, but for Dems, they Always are).

2) If she doesn't, she's an unfeeling, unemotional stonehearted bitch who, if she couldn't shed a tear for her own family, cannot be expected to feel the pain of the Average American, or to care a fig about them in their Time of Need - which, according to the Dems, is always Now.

re: #39 Shr_Nfr

They will compare the shit he produces to the shit 0bama produces on the American public and be forced to conclude that the kid's shit is of higher quality.

More seriously, I expect unsubstantiated "revelations" that Palin considered an abortion. Unfortunately for 0bama, that is the wrong thing to say. It says that this lady has had the choice that has faced many, many women in their lives and then decided to have the child on the strength of her beliefs and character.

Of course she considered one. . .
The same way Obama considered joining the military.

re: #219 wright1

Yes but the Libs had this thing contained until Palin showed up - she must be DESTROYED

Sadly, I'm afraid we're going to see a Full Court Press until election day.

☪NN is broadcasting a McCain expose right now. I just looked in, they were taking about the Keeting 5.

Odd, they've cleverly avoided the ripe field of improper associations of _{the one}

So after the news of the NYT cutting sections from their paper, they are going to do something ridiculous like this? Why not just cut their losses and shut the paper down or sell it?

re: #230 Salamantis

You're all missing the rationale behind all of these gratuitous media attacks; the media are trying to see if they can make Sarah Palin publicly cry.

1) If she does, she's a fragile overwrought emotional flower who lacks the inner strength and resilience to be a Heartbeat from the Presidency of our nation in these Critical Times (and these times are indeed critical, but for Dems, they Always are).

2) If she doesn't, she's an unfeeling, unemotional stonehearted bitch who, if she couldn't shed a tear for her own family, cannot be expected to feel the pain of the Average American, or to care a fig about them in their Time of Need - which, according to the Dems, is always Now.

What if she punches out the NYT's reporter?

YOU GO NYT ! !

Nul set = Obama

Dull Set = Biden

FLASH! Trig soils diapers.

had child with Miguel Estrada named Vector

re: #176 Nevergiveup

It's never impossible to confuse a liberal.

You have that right. I can't count the number of liberal women who have lectured me that Hillary was the best choice for President because "we need a woman in the White House!" Enter Sarah Palin, a strong conservative female, and they morph from Gloria Steinham into Phyllis Schlafly: "She has no business accepting the nod for Vice-President. She should be home taking care of her family."

re: #236 RTLM

YOU GO NYT ! !

GO ,GO NOW AND DON'T COME BACK!

re: #192 Nevergiveup

A quick aside:

Sources: Brady out with ACL tear

[Link: sports.yahoo.com...]

GO JETS!

Boy, once Karma found the Patriots, it ain't letting go.

W.T.F.?

WHAT could they possibly be thinking?

Pretty funny stuff over at The Anchoress right now...

September 7, 2008

The Humbling: “The One” goes to Don Clinton

So, it appears that “The One” is going begging to Don Clinton, hat in hand:

The One strides in confidently and extends his hand to The Don. The Don looks up, contemplates the proffered hand, and watches The One’s smile fade as it is not shaken. The One retracts his hand, and tilts his head, comprehending, but not liking it. Still, he needs this meeting.

Don Clinton nods slightly, and with a silky hand motions The One to take a seat. Don Clinton’s blue eyes are grave, but there is a noticeable twitching about his mouth, as though he is suppressing a smile, or sucking on a peeled grape. He remains silent. The One looks about the room in discomfort, waiting for an opening. Don Clinton makes a point of playing with his pinky ring, and gives him none. Finally, clearing his throat and assuming a cavalier affect, The One speaks:

The One: Uh, thank you, Mr. President, for seeing me in your beautiful offices.

Don Clinton nods, but says nothing. More praise is due.

The One: I, um, think it’s er…a wonderful, a wonderful testament to your, eh, your um, unquestionable commitment to em, the uh, your solidarity with the black community.

Don Clinton, remembering when The One played the race card on him, narrows his eyes and does not smile. He leans back in his chair and waits, squinting through the smoke, his cigar tilting upward in his mouth, ala FDR. More praise is due.

The One: It - it was a masterstroke of erm, brilliant racist-baiting, erm…a stroke of masterburbating, uhhhh, stroking, ermmm…a master…stroke…of getting back at the Republican jerks who impeached you and foreplaying, I mean forestalling any future innuendo or scandals intern erm…in turn.

Don Clinton’s eyes are ablaze with anger. The One, too cool to cower, crosses his legs and wishes for a teleprompter.

It goes on !

Link: [Link: theanchoressonline.com...]

re: #233 guzziguy

☪NN is broadcasting a McCain expose right now. I just looked in, they were taking about the Keeting 5.

Odd, they've cleverly avoided the ripe field of improper associations of _{the one}

That's wrong. It should be ". . the improper associations of ^{the one} "

Character assassins are in full gear now. Since they (NYT, et al) cannot win on debating the issues they resort to mudslingling. What was that called ealier in the 20th/c: yellow journalism?

Truly pathetic.

re: #230 Salamantis

You're all missing the rationale behind all of these gratuitous media attacks; the media are trying to see if they can make Sarah Palin publicly cry.

1) If she does, she's a fragile overwrought emotional flower who lacks the inner strength and resilience to be a Heartbeat from the Presidency of our nation in these Critical Times (and these times are indeed critical, but for Dems, they Always are).

2) If she doesn't, she's an unfeeling, unemotional stonehearted bitch who, if she couldn't shed a tear for her own family, cannot be expected to feel the pain of the Average American, or to care a fig about them in their Time of Need - which, according to the Dems, is always Now.

What the American people will see instead is a strong woman who sees little need to acknowledge the puny attacks of her moral inferiors.

re: #231 looking closely

Of course she considered one. . .
The same way Obama considered joining the military.

Actually, she might very well have considered abortion. It takes lots of guts and faith to raise a disabled child.

re: #188 deepthroat

They're going to say that the baby might not be her husbands.

Just my guess.

I think that's the textbook definition of libel.

For the last eight years the Dems and their advocates in the Press have had a free hand to sling shit all over anything Republican and never worry about anyone thinking they went too far with their attacks. They are like a dog on a chain who keeps running further and further out because he doesn't know how long the chain is. Eventually the dog gets to the end and the chain yanks them on the neck. And that is where they'll find themselves if they keep up the asinine hit pieces on Sarah Palin and her family. And they will do just that because they can't stop themselves. And they'll end up driving voters to McCain-Palin.

re: #221 Tigger2005

Nah. That was the sixth child. Sextuplets! That makes the scandal even juicier, since it's got a word with "sex" in it.

OK, the sixth child is

Topo (middle name Logy).

(Named after comic mouse Topo Gigio.)

Yeah I agree with a lot of the sentiments - this has "backfire" written all over it and frankly to voters Sarah is scooping up do not read this rag.

Drudge now claims it's from "newsroom sources"

re: #230 Salamantis

You're all missing the rationale behind all of these gratuitous media attacks; the media are trying to see if they can make Sarah Palin publicly cry.

1) If she does, she's a fragile overwrought emotional flower who lacks the inner strength and resilience to be a Heartbeat from the Presidency of our nation in these Critical Times (and these times are indeed critical, but for Dems, they Always are).

2) If she doesn't, she's an unfeeling, unemotional stonehearted bitch who, if she couldn't shed a tear for her own family, cannot be expected to feel the pain of the Average American, or to care a fig about them in their Time of Need - which, according to the Dems, is always Now.

I think you're right, but I would go with the simpler they want to make her cry and quit.

re: #157 LoFlyer

Perhaps it is time for the blogs to research and publish our findings on the activities of the family that owns the NYT, specifically sexual affairs, abortions, divorces, drug and alcohol abuse. Stuff like that. See how the owners enjoy the shoe on the other foot.

I completely agree with that. It's time to take on the Sulzbergers PERSONALLY. Let's see how they like it.

Trig actually will have to have someone cosine any document before he sines off.
(Just going off on a tangent.)

Koskidz are oddly silent about this.

Drudge's headline has gone from the NYT fronting an "expose" to a "detailed story".

In 30 minutes, it'll be a "haiku":

It must be Bristol's.
Obama cannot lose now!
She should've killed it.

-WFH

Women and minorities hardest hit.

I can't believe the piece would be remotely positive toward Governor Palin, so lets assume for the sake of argument that its a hit piece. It's almost mind boggling to believe they would be that stupid.

re: #36 Metal Man

Trig has a boob fixation.

Give that baby a cigar!

Maybe they've found out the baby's one of those mysterious alien babies, like the ones who pop up in British attics. . . [Link: www.museumofhoaxes.com...]

Seriously, I hope the NYT, and the rest of the left, keep this up. Finally, they're letting their mask drop, and showing everybody what they really are.

re: #250 looking closely

I think that's the textbook definition of libel.

Just about every word that anyone has written surrounding the whole affair - starting with Alan Colmes - fits the textbook definition of libel.

The grey hag is obviously trying to shrink their readership.

re: #235 Nevergiveup

What if she punches out the NYT's reporter?

Or, Todd does. Either way, I'd love to see it.

re: #249 galloping granny

Actually, she might very well have considered abortion. It takes lots of guts and faith to raise a disabled child.

I meant what I wrote, literally.

She likely considered an abortion like Obama considered joining the military. . .they both thought about it for a few seconds and then decided not to do it.

Frankly, I couldn't fault her if she did have an abortion (and of course, ironically, had she done it, nobody would ever have heard about this non-"scandal"). But IMO she did the much braver thing by having the kid.