LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

An Insanely Biased Debate Moderator

Politics | Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:25:48 pm PDT

Gwen Ifill should step down as moderator of the vice presidential debate: A debate “moderator” in the tank for Obama.

Come on now. This is getting completely ridiculous.

Advertisement

493 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 rawmuse  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:26:36pm

Nothing to see here, move along. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

2 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:26:52pm

Man, this is rigged.

3 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:27:39pm

They should replace her with somebody a bit more objective like Keith Olberman

/

4 Opilio  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:27:59pm

Wouldn't an impossible bias be a bias toward the Republican candidate?

5 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:28:27pm
This is getting completely ridiculous.


Getting? It's been ridiculous since Rev. Wright popped his head up. It's been unfuckingbelievable ever since.

6 Irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:28:31pm

Yes, she should step down, Charles. You're absolutely right. But I doubt she will.

7 Meremortal  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:28:33pm

Timed the release for inauguration day, does she know something?

Nahhh....

8 rawmuse  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:29:13pm

Replace her with Hugh Hewitt, or Charles Johnson, or me or just about anyone.

9 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:29:17pm

Where do Repub leaders get those tee-shirts with the logo on the back that says 'Kick Me'?

10 rednaxela  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:30:14pm

They're not going to replace Gwen but that's ok. Americans are quite capable of factoring in that sort of bias, so long as they are made aware of it.

11 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:31:55pm

Obviously any objections about the moderator implies racism.

/

12 Irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:32:08pm

The more I hear about these pro-0bama people the less I want to call them my fellow countrymen.

And that really really depresses me.

13 Syrah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:32:26pm

re: #2 Celtic Templar

Man, this is rigged.

From the first to the last.

14 hepcat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:32:43pm

GOP should call her bluff and demand she steps down.

15 HelloDare  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:33:21pm

My heads spins trying to fathom how they are going to try and spin this.

16 Irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:33:39pm

I mean, it's not as though Gwen didn't know when she signed onto the debate that she was writing this book.

/really feel like puking

17 Syrah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:33:51pm

re: #9 runrabbitrun

Where do Repub leaders get those tee-shirts with the logo on the back that says 'Kick Me'?

Tattoo Parlors. (They're not T-shirts.)

18 Opilio  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:34:13pm

The left is shameless. Appearance of impropriety? -- a bourgeois concept.

19 TheMatrix31  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:34:15pm

I mean, seriously. How could this happen?

20 joecitizen[deleted]  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:34:59pm
21 HelloDare  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:35:31pm

I have an idea. Gwen can ask Palin questions and David Freddoso can ask Biden questions. That's fair.

22 rawmuse  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:35:35pm

re: #10 rednaxela

They're not going to replace Gwen but that's ok. Americans are quite capable of factoring in that sort of bias, so long as they are made aware of it.

Doubtful. Just ask any Obama supporter.

23 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:35:38pm

re: #10 rednaxela

They're not going to replace Gwen but that's ok. Americans are quite capable of factoring in that sort of bias, so long as they are made aware of it.

If Governor Palin is asked truly ridiculous questions (For 100 points, what is the zip code for northeastern Helsinki?), does this mean that she will be able to call Ifell a racist?

24 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:35:44pm

TVNewser reports that Ifill has broken her ankle

She tripped over the hugh pile of contemptuous bias she brought for Palin.

25 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:36:48pm

re: #3 Shug

They should replace her with somebody a bit more objective like Keith Olberman

/

That is too funny!
GMTA here is my email to the debate contact:

Are you aware that the VP debate moderator Gwen Ifill, is releasing a pro Obama book after the Election?
Why is someone who is obviously very partial to Obama moderating this debate?

Why not just get Keith Olbermann?

Isn't the person supposed to be impartial?

Quote:

In an online video promoting her book, she is enthusiastic about "taking the story of Barack Obama and extending it."

It focuses on four people, "one of them Barack Obama of course," she said.

[Link: www.wnd.com...]

Please get someone to moderate this debate who is non partisan.

Thank You,

26 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:36:51pm

Yeah, I mentioned this is the last thread. Isn't this a conflict of interest?

27 Wishing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:37:14pm

Who selected her to be moderator?

28 TheMatrix31  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:37:17pm

re: #10 rednaxela

They're not going to replace Gwen but that's ok. Americans are quite capable of factoring in that sort of bias, so long as they are made aware of it.

Do you really think that the general public will know that this chick is in the tank for Obama? I doubt there's any way they'll find out that she's writing a BOOK about him.

Oh boy.

29 right_on_target  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:37:29pm

If she can't trip up Sarah Palin, she'll screw up so badly in moderating this debate that the Democrats will have an excuse for Joe Biden's losing it.

Gwen Ifill just needs to keep from interrupting Sarah and not correct Joe when he flubs.

30 Intrepid  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:38:31pm

What group is responsible for choosing or proposing debate moderators? Don't both campaigns have to sign off on all the details? Was this known when the debate details were decided?

31 Opilio  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:04pm

re: #24 solomonpanting

TVNewser reports that Ifill has broken her ankle

She tripped over the hugh pile of contemptuous bias she brought for Palin.


The hugh pile? Would that be Hugh Hewitt? Downs? Hefner? Grant? Laurie?

32 Pawn of the Oppressor  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:09pm

All we need yet is Youtube footage of a secret meeting of MSM bigwigs worshipping an Obama shrine.

33 Killer Tomato  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:16pm

Why don't they just be honest?
Newspapers should just place "Vote Obama!" above their mastheads, every newscast should start off with "Good morning/afternoon/evening - vote early and often for Obama! And now for the top story..."
This is what it's come to.

34 kynna  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:19pm

Is it possible that enough focus could get her replaced? I don't think so. I think that might be considered racist.

All the more reason to say a prayer that Saracuda knocks it out of the park.

After seeing how they've decided that Obama won the debate with McCain when in fact he was toasted, it will be nearly impossible for Palin to come out ahead. But they can't lie if a lot of people watch and I think enough people are curious that they could get good ratings.

35 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:25pm

re: #30 Intrepid

What group is responsible for choosing or proposing debate moderators? Don't both campaigns have to sign off on all the details? Was this known when the debate details were decided?

it was at least known to her fer crissakes ...

36 RememberSekhmet?  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:28pm

Maybe Palin and Biden can go at one another enough that the moderator is reduced simply to holding a whip and chair

37 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:30pm

I will give you the email addy of the person to contact to protest this.
nic is blue

38 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:35pm

PIMF ,in the last thread...

39 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:45pm

This is simply wrong. McCain now has his chance to show some balls and say it. He is a fucking fool.

40 Irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:45pm

From the comments at Amazon:

Email Janet H. Brown, Executive Director of the Debates Commission: jb@debates.org and send your complaints.

CONTACT The Commission on Presidential Debates 202-872-1020
Keep trying. You will find that the mailbox is full, BUT...it will ask you if you want to transfer to another extension (*8 I believe), then enter 12#. That will transfer you to a place that WILL accept voicemails on this subject.


Okay, Lizards, here's all the info. Let's stop whining and hop to it!
;)

41 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:48pm

She makes a living working for PBS. That really tells you all you need to know. Ask yourself who else lives this way...let me give you a few examples:

Big Bird (asks harder questions of Dems that Ifill)
Elmo (less annoying than the Shrew on the View)
Barney (only Joe Biden has a more massive swollen head)
that guy that took over for Bob Vila on "This Old House" (Obama better pray he can get Norm to do all the work)

Second thought...Gwen fits in fine.

42 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:39:49pm

re: #23 runrabbitrun

If Governor Palin is asked truly ridiculous questions (For 100 points, what is the zip code for northeastern Helsinki?), does this mean that she will be able to call Ifell a racist?

No, she should just issue an ultimatum: if Ifell remains moderator, no debate. We'll catch flak for it, but nowhere near what we'll catch if Ifell get in a good Gotcha. We can't let this biased woman moderate this debate.

43 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:40:07pm

re: #31 Opilio

Yikes!

44 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:40:11pm

re: #26 nigella

Yeah, I mentioned this is the last thread. Isn't this a conflict of interest?

No, a CONFLICT of interest would be if she desperately wanted Obama to win, and wasn't in a position to torpedo the running mate of his opponent.

I'd say that in this situation, Ifill's interests in helping Obama and sabotaging Sarah Palin are perfectly aligned.

45 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:40:53pm

re: #3 Shug

They should replace her with somebody a bit more objective like Keith Olberman

/

In Re: Olbermann; See Ray Finkel's mother...

46 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:40:56pm

The fix is absolutely in now!

Watch for Biden to develop some serious medical condition by Monday, and Hillary will jump right in to save the democraps.

I will bet anyone here a beer on it.

(good beer - none of that watered down rice brewed crap.)

47 Sydney Carton  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:40:57pm

A financial interest in the outcome of the election is a classic case of bias, even if this person weren't a dyed in the wool PBS liberal. It is beyond belief that she thinks she can fairly moderate this debate. That only goes to show how deluded she really is.

Charles is right. This is getting ridiculous. But that's the point. They keep pushing the envelope, so that the bar is lowered each time. In 2012, it will be Olberman as moderator, if this is allowed to stand.

48 Mr Michael  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:40:57pm

You act as if this is something, oh, I dunno... different? Unusual? Unexpected?

But then, there's nothing that says Ms. Ifill is going to let her Professionally Cultured Bias infect the proceedings tomorrow. I'm sure that as a Professional she's aware of the potential and will be scrupulously fair. Friday morning, after we all have a chance to calm down and consider her performance with some detachment we'll agree that in no way whatsoever did she let her preferences color her treatment of What's-his-name, the white guy our Chosen One has allowed to be his VP running mate.

49 Bubblehead II  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:41:12pm

Come on now. This is getting completely ridiculous.

Charles, hate to tell ya this. But it's passed the point of ridiculous at about the same time the Democraps held their convention coronation . It has now passed the point of ludicrous. The only question is when are they going to finish digging their way to China?

50 Pawn of the Oppressor  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:41:49pm

Q to Biden: "Right Hand of The Leader, is it true that The One's Divine Post-Racial Light has healed your wounds and taken away all sadness?"

Q to Palin: "Tell us how your racist Christian "god" commands you to murder helpless creatures for pleasure, and how that relates to your hatred for all life on this planet."

51 Oldasdirt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:42:03pm

PBS is no a liberal arm of the media.Nope.Gone plain Communist

52 rednaxela  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:42:09pm

re: #23 runrabbitrun

If Governor Palin is asked truly ridiculous questions (For 100 points, what is the zip code for northeastern Helsinki?), does this mean that she will be able to call Ifell a racist?

I guess that might not be the best play politically, but I think she should then ask Gwen about the title of her new book.

53 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:42:16pm

Stuiec, o. k. if it isn't a conflict of interest, how about unethhical?

54 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:42:17pm

Saw this in the Amazon comments for her "book":

Caroline Kennedy is on the Board of Directors of the "Commission on Presidential Debates"! Talk about a Kennedy-style Fix! First Caroline Kennedy endorses Obama. Then she Co-chairs Obama's VP search committee, selecting...

Is this true? Are we the only sane people left? Why isn't there a shutdown of this crap - this is how their revolution is won - media, academia and entertainment in the tank for the communists. Fucking Clockwork Orange, except its in every nook and cranny of our mindspace ... a fucking Communist Matrix.

I am furious.

55 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:42:38pm

Palin should bring a copy of the book out and ask Gwen to sign it for her at the beginning of the debate...

...wouldn't that be sweet?

56 HelloDare  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:43:04pm

Let her moderate the damn debate. Just have her wear a dunce cap and a big red nose. Seriously. She should not get away with this.

Who else knew about this? They are messing with a Presidential election. And these are the people who want the fairness doctrine? What a joke. Ifill works for public TV, too. Tax payers pay part of her salary.

57 TheMatrix31  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:43:18pm

re: #54 Celtic Templar

Saw this in the Amazon comments for her "book":

a fucking Communist Matrix.

WHAT DID YOU CALL ME?!?!?!?!?

58 JohnSteele  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:43:25pm

And naturally there is no contact information for the Commission on Presidential Debates (www.debates.org). There is no way for us to make our objections known to the commission. Guess they don't want to hear from the American unwashed, it would mess up their day.

59 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:43:48pm

After watching McCain and his silly smile the last few days , I am reminded over and over again why I hate this unctuous fool. My office has already told me they are sitting the election out. Shamnesty and stupid vacant smiles don't cut it.

60 Noah's Arrrgh  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:43:53pm

The fix is in, indeed. As loath am I to say it, I'm afraid that come January this country will see its first Bolševik president inaugurated.

Here's what's going to really bug me. After the MSM manages to finally get their guy in through obfuscation and equivocation, they're going to semi-apologize, saying, in effect, maybe we did overdo it a bit, but, gee, no hard feelings.

I'm going keep reminding them as the Obama presidency turns to disaster that it was they who put him in power.

61 rednaxela  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:03pm

re: #28 TheMatrix31

No, you're right. But imagine how effective it would play if Palin brought up the book issue during the debate.

I think this is the way to play it.

62 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:07pm

re: #58 JohnSteele

And naturally there is no contact information for the Commission on Presidential Debates (www.debates.org). There is no way for us to make our objections known to the commission. Guess they don't want to hear from the American unwashed, it would mess up their day.


I HAVE AN EMAIL ADDY CONTACT.
my nic is blue email me and I will give it to you

63 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:16pm

re: #50 Pawn of the Oppressor

Q to Biden: "Right Hand of The Leader, is it true that The One's Divine Post-Racial Light has healed your wounds and taken away all sadness?"

Q to Palin: "Tell us how your racist Christian "god" commands you to murder helpless creatures for pleasure, and how that relates to your hatred for all life on this planet."

I think this was a Q/A on Palastinian TV...where is that big Bee Nasul? Or was this from North Korean state television?

64 RTLM  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:38pm

She can have the first 45 minutes and Rush Limbaugh can have the last 45 minutes.

(highest ratings ever, MSM...)

/and fair is fair dammit.

65 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:42pm

re: #58 JohnSteele

And naturally there is no contact information for the Commission on Presidential Debates (www.debates.org). There is no way for us to make our objections known to the commission. Guess they don't want to hear from the American unwashed, it would mess up their day.

JB@DEBATES.ORG

66 Syrah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:45pm

Palin should open by congratulating Gwen on her "Pro-Obama" book deal. State up front that she knows the truth about the nature of the charade and all its implications.

These debate things are about showmanship. Biden is just a bit player and sideshow distraction in this debate. The debate is really Palin versus the Moderators.

67 right_on_target  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:49pm

re: #55 brainwizard73

Palin should bring a copy of the book out and ask Gwen to sign it for her at the beginning of the debate...

...wouldn't that be sweet?

_________________________________
B I N G O !

68 Ackomanyuki  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:50pm

Socrates weeps.

The Natural bedrock standards of logic and rhetoric of the Academy in the arena of public debate have now been replaced by a preponderance of post enlightenment nihilistic social engineers and run of the mill Mau Maus.

If this isn't readily apparent, you are either uneducated in the truest classical sense, or a willing malefactor against It that Is.

69 Adrenalyn  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:44:59pm

re: #9 runrabbitrun

Where do Repub leaders get those tee-shirts with the logo on the back that says 'Kick Me'?

because the "Pussident" wears one
ever since about 10-11-2001 he lost his balls

that as about how long it took for the Nazicrats to stop acting bi-partisan and patriotic

and he sat there and took it
and took it
and took it

70 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:45:01pm

I demand fairness and impartiality for Gov. Palin , I demand Gwen Ifill be replaced with Bill Moyers at once!

/

71 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:45:09pm

The MSM, in cahoots with powerful forces behind the scenes (e.g. Soros) have pretty much taken control in the shaping of the outcome of this election. And no, this is not a conspiracy theory.

72 Wishing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:45:10pm

re: #40 Irene NYC

email sent

73 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:45:19pm

Getting ridiculous? Unless and until we have debates where Candidate A asks Candiate B a direct question and B has x amount of time to answer and then A has x amount of time to rebut, then Candidate B asks Candidate A a question, rinse and repeat, and where the moderator ONLY KEEPS TRACK OF TIME, then we'll NEVER have real damn debates for POTUS.
If it was good enough for Lincoln/Douglass it should be damn sure good enough for McCain/Obama and Palin/Biden.
Screw this debate format - let the candidates - ya know - debate each other on topics the candidates choose!

74 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:45:32pm
75 looking closely  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:45:51pm

Much noise needs to be made of this.

Why on earth is this woman permitted to moderate a VP debate?

This is sheer insanity.

76 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:01pm

re: #59 pat

After watching McCain and his silly smile the last few days , I am reminded over and over again why I hate this unctuous fool. My office has already told me they are sitting the election out. Shamnesty and stupid vacant smiles don't cut it.

It's Pat! Is it a girl or a boy a troll or a fool?

77 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:12pm

re: #42 Dark_Falcon

No, she should just issue an ultimatum: if Ifell remains moderator, no debate. We'll catch flak for it, but nowhere near what we'll catch if Ifell get in a good Gotcha. We can't let this biased woman moderate this debate.

Screw that. Let Palin include in her very first answer to the very first question:

"By the way, Gwen, I note that you have a book coming out on Inauguration Day. If I'm not mistaken, it's called 'The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.' Given your article in Essence Magazine, 'At Home with the Obama Family,' I'm sure you are going to be working extra hard not to let your political favoritism affect the way in which you moderate this debate -- aren't you?"

78 Pawn of the Oppressor  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:24pm

I'm feeling a bit like the Liberty Tree needs watering, these days. This is crazy.

79 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:28pm

re: #59 pat

After watching McCain and his silly smile the last few days , I am reminded over and over again why I hate this unctuous fool. My office has already told me they are sitting the election out. Shamnesty and stupid vacant smiles don't cut it.

Pat,

Every election it seems like we have to chose between the moron on the right, and the idiot on the left. Sit it out if you want - but you completely forfeit your right to bitch about it afterwards. IMO.

80 TheMatrix31  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:32pm

re: #55 brainwizard73

Palin should bring a copy of the book out and ask Gwen to sign it for her at the beginning of the debate...

...wouldn't that be sweet?

That would be great. Unfortunately, the general public will view Palin as being a snappy, petty, bitch with an inferiority complex or something. Something ridiculous, as usual.

81 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:35pm

The title of Ifill’s book? “Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.”

Here's hoping the "Age of Obama" has as much relevance as "The Age of Dukakis" or "The Age of Kerry".

(The age being, oh, not much beyond that of a teenager.)

82 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:38pm

re: #64 RTLM

She can have the first 45 minutes and Rush Limbaugh can have the last 45 minutes.

(highest ratings ever, MSM...)

/and fair is fair dammit.

Hey, I would be willing to suffer (I can't believe I am saying this) 45 minutes of the MSNBC brownshirts asking questions if I could get Rush on with Obama for 45 minutes...

Brilliant, as usual.

83 zombie  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:42pm

I'll believe Gwen Ifill is impartial when she asks Biden,

"Senator Biden, am I clean and articulate enough for you?"

84 Jimmah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:53pm

I won't be watching this debate. I like Palin, but expect her to be eaten alive, again.

85 Adrenalyn  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:46:59pm

re: #66 Syrah

Palin should open by congratulating Gwen on her "Pro-Obama" book deal. State up front that she knows the truth about the nature of the charade and all its implications.

These debate things are about showmanship. Biden is just a bit player and sideshow distraction in this debate. The debate is really Palin versus the Moderators.

well said, an upding for you dear poster
but will McCain let her do that.......

86 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:01pm

re: #62 Typicalwhitey
Hey Typicalwhitely - I posted this to you on the prior thread, just as most everyone came rushing over here, but it's worth reposting to you:
"Ah, don't know why you were down in the dumps Typicalwhitey - you actually took a stand - a semi-dangerous stand given where you live - to blow the whistle on the Obama Truth Goon Squads of DA's and Sheriff's down you way. That you got an acknowledgement from one paper is GREAT and I suspect your numerous letters will wind up provoking a much bigger response in the days ahead!
You actually did that which many say they'd "like to do" or "someone" should do, as long as that someone isn't them.
NEVER feel down because you stood up for what's right. NEVER. Other folks will just have to pick up the damn learning curve.
As I've told you in an e-mail, I'm damn proud of you, for what little that may be worth."

87 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:06pm

re: #42 Dark_Falcon

No, she should just issue an ultimatum: if Ifell remains moderator, no debate. We'll catch flak for it, but nowhere near what we'll catch if Ifell get in a good Gotcha. We can't let this biased woman moderate this debate.

I ask the same question as 'wishing' and 'intrepid', upthread: who in hell is responsible for choosing these moderators, and more importantly, why do Repub campaigns agree to be sandbagged by partisan hacks, time and time again?

88 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:17pm

re: #82 brainwizard73

Hey, I would be willing to suffer (I can't believe I am saying this) 45 minutes of the MSNBC brownshirts asking questions if I could get Rush on with Obama for 45 minutes...

Brilliant, as usual.


Highest ratings for the last 45 minutes anyway

89 spirochete  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:30pm

re: #68 Ackomanyuki

Hey, nice post!

90 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:43pm

re: #66 Syrah

You don't understand. McCain and Palin have decided they are above the fray. Like religious pacifists that pray for rapists of their daughters. These doddering fools must go. They are not ready.

91 rednaxela  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:46pm

Well, its on Drudge now. My bet is that she will be replaced by tomorrow morning (with someone else who's in the tank for Barry... just someone who hasn't written a book about him).

92 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:47pm

re: #67 right_on_target

_________________________________
B I N G O !

"Gwen, before we start, I just wanted to get your autograph...more people know who you are than know who I am...even though you are on PBS..."

93 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:47:49pm

Pat I'm sorry to say I to am not happy with McCain. I was a Rudy backer and Thompson. That being said I will swallow my pride and unhappiness and crawl if I have to to vote for McCain.The alternative is too horrific to think about.

94 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:48:11pm

re: #53 nigella

Stuiec, o. k. if it isn't a conflict of interest, how about unethhical?

Hmmm... ethics and journalism. Not seeing the connection.

Certainly, of course, one might assume that the Commission on Presidential Debates has a vested interest in a fair and impartial debate. But I am not sure that assumption is warranted.

95 Adrenalyn  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:48:51pm

re: #83 zombie

I'll believe Gwen Ifill is impartial when she asks Biden,

"Senator Biden, am I clean and articulate enough for you?"

ewww
that hurts

/good point though
upding sent !

96 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:48:54pm

re: #64 RTLM

She can have the first 45 minutes and Rush Limbaugh can have the last 45 minutes.

(highest ratings ever, MSM...)

/and fair is fair dammit.


I can't wait to hear Rush's take on this today.

97 Oldasdirt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:49:00pm

re: #77 stuiec

Screw that. Let Palin include in her very first answer to the very first question:

"By the way, Gwen, I note that you have a book coming out on Inauguration Day. If I'm not mistaken, it's called 'The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.' Given your article in Essence Magazine, 'At Home with the Obama Family,' I'm sure you are going to be working extra hard not to let your political favoritism affect the way in which you moderate this debate -- aren't you?"


Spot on!

98 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:49:27pm

re: #86 realwest


Thanks real.
Actually I was down because of the polls and then for no reason McCain gained 2 in the gallup polls and I said I am just not going to pay attention to those damn polls again!

Thanks for your kind words

99 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:49:29pm

re: #93 nigella

Pat I'm sorry to say I to am not happy with McCain. I was a Rudy backer and Thompson. That being said I will swallow my pride and unhappiness and crawl if I have to to vote for McCain.The alternative is too horrific to think about.

Fuck - you'd have to dismember me Black Knight style to get me NOT to vote for McCain. This is bullshit, complete utter bullshit.

100 Killian Bundy  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:49:33pm

re: #2 Celtic Templar

Man, this is rigged.

/not sure we can steal it this time

101 rawmuse  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:49:40pm

The modern debate moderator technique goes something like this

a) first posit a lie as the truth
b) compel the candidate to then accept and explain the lie

102 JohnSteele  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:49:42pm

Thanks for the contact info. I have emailed Ms Brown objecting in the strongest possible terms. Unless they replace this obvously biased choce it might be reasonable to conclude that the commission itself is biased.

103 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:49:45pm

re: #79 Racer X

Pat,

Every election it seems like we have to chose between the moron on the right, and the idiot on the left. Sit it out if you want - but you completely forfeit your right to bitch about it afterwards. IMO.

That, unfortunately, is not an option for me.

104 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:50:01pm

re: #59 pat

Well, at least ya got an upding from your unhinged pal EIDE. WTG.

105 right_on_target  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:50:22pm

re: #81 solomonpanting

The title of Ifill’s book? “Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.”

Here's hoping the "Age of Obama" has as much relevance as "The Age of Dukakis" or "The Age of Kerry".

(The age being, oh, not much beyond that of a teenager.)

_________________________________
AGE of OBAMA?
Is that during the first or second kingdom? Before or after the Great Pyramid? Or the Long March?

106 x-wing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:50:27pm

re: #80 TheMatrix31

That would be great. Unfortunately, the general public will view Palin as being a snappy, petty, bitch with an inferiority complex or something. Something ridiculous, as usual.

What's wrong with that? I like that in a woman.

//

107 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:50:27pm

re: #80 TheMatrix31

My friend, the "public" (it will be reported) will view her that way no matter what she does because the media will spin it that way...either that or they will superimpose some flames behind her and horns on her head during the debate...MSNBC still trying to figure out if the horns are too over the top.

Agree of course with you, but an off-hand reference like "hey, it isn't like I wrote a book about how great Senator Obama is...but I do think he has a point on this issue..." might be a good idea.

108 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:50:29pm

re: #46 Racer X

The fix is absolutely in now!

Watch for Biden to develop some serious medical condition by Monday, and Hillary will jump right in to save the democraps.

I will bet anyone here a beer on it.

(good beer - none of that watered down rice brewed crap.)

The debate is in less than 48 hours.

109 Pawn of the Oppressor  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:50:55pm

re: #82 brainwizard73

Hey, I would be willing to suffer (I can't believe I am saying this) 45 minutes of the MSNBC brownshirts asking questions if I could get Rush on with Obama for 45 minutes....

I would pay real cash money to watch that on TV. I would give almost anything - ANYTHING - to see somebody sit that slipperly little Marxist bastard down with no teleprompter, no handlers, no consultants, no favorable camera angles, no backlit halo stages - NOTHING - and nail him with all the hard questions he refuses to answer. Videotape that shit in high-def and post the whole entire thing, unedited.

Rezko, Ayers, Alinsky, that woman who ran the collapsed bank, Fannie Mae, ACORN, the lot of it, just hit him like the freaking Normandy landings one after the other with no letup.

"YES OR NO?"

/Couric.

110 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:51:09pm

Oh, and for you doom and gloomers who think Obama will have sleepovers in the white house sometime in 2009 - suck on this.

AOL poll:
McCain - 61%
Obama - 39%

Total straw poll votes - 355,659.

111 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:51:39pm

Fuck, Eide. What does it take McCain to get mad? Is he on drugs?

112 Wishing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:51:42pm

re: #102 JohnSteele

Thanks for the contact info. I have emailed Ms Brown objecting in the strongest possible terms. Unless they replace this obvously biased choce it might be reasonable to conclude that the commission itself is biased.

Do you think they care?

113 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:52:01pm

re: #90 pat

You don't understand. McCain and Palin have decided they are above the fray. Like religious pacifists that pray for rapists of their daughters. These doddering fools must go. They are not ready.

Just STFU and STFD down, Patrick.

114 Sydney Carton  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:52:17pm
Screw that. Let Palin include in her very first answer to the very first question:

"By the way, Gwen, I note that you have a book coming out on Inauguration Day. If I'm not mistaken, it's called 'The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.' Given your article in Essence Magazine, 'At Home with the Obama Family,' I'm sure you are going to be working extra hard not to let your political favoritism affect the way in which you moderate this debate -- aren't you?"

No, that's not good enough. It's asking her if she's fair. Of course Ifill will answer that she's fair, because to her, liberals are always fair.

Palin should flat out call her biased from the beginning. Palin should just call her out, call out the entire charade. And she can link it to the MSM in general trying to destroy her. Tie it to the arrogance of Charles Gibson, Katie Couric, and others.

115 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:52:22pm

re: #81 solomonpanting

Stone Age
Bronze Age
Iron Age
Reagan Age
Obama Age
"the Restoration"
Peace, freedom and lots of economic growth Age.

Right?

116 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:52:41pm

re: #110 Racer X

Oh, and for you doom and gloomers who think Obama will have sleepovers in the white house sometime in 2009 - suck on this.

AOL poll:
McCain - 61%
Obama - 39%

Total straw poll votes - 355,659.

Wow. And these polls usually are infested with communists.

117 Catttt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:53:09pm

There are currently 54 angry threads on the Amazon page for Ms. Ifill's book.

This one caught my eye:

As of 12:37 pm EST, the Commission on Presidential Debates voicemail box is full.

118 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:53:11pm

re: #90 pat

You don't understand. McCain and Palin have decided they are above the fray. Like religious pacifists that pray for rapists of their daughters. These doddering fools must go. They are not ready.

Jeebus Pat, what have you been smokin?

119 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:53:11pm

re: #113 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Fuck off

120 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:53:33pm

re: #111 pat

Fuck, Eide. What does it take McCain to get mad? Is he on drugs?

he was tortured for 5 plus years and didn't get lost in anger..indeed, it coukd be argued that he grew enormous balls because of it...

121 Tarkus289  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:54:24pm

The reason McCain can not show anger is because for the last year the left kept bringing up his anger, then they push him to the brink so he will blow, then they say we told you so.... WIN
..or

He keeps a lid on his temper and lets them get away with every lie and slanderous statement they make.... WIN

122 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:54:28pm

re: #105 right_on_target

_________________________________
AGE of OBAMA?
Is that during the first or second kingdom? Before or after the Great Pyramid? Or the Long March?

The Age of Stupidity

123 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:54:28pm

Maybe McCain only gets mad at Republicans?

124 x-wing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:54:44pm

re: #103 pat

That, unfortunately, is not an option for me.

What? What in the hell does that mean?

125 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:54:46pm

re: #119 pat

Fuck off

Wow, I just cannot debate such a thought provoking and thoroughly parsed out and sourced post such as this one.

Bravo pat!

126 Adrenalyn  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:54:52pm

honestly, I would include the book in every answer

Gov Palin, how would you handle the Bush-induced banking crisis ?

well Gwen, your candidate and friend, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, who you are writing a book about, had the best synopsis of my feelings on the crisis and perhaps you quoted him and me in your book

we both believe Congress needs to come together in a bipartisan way to solve the crisis

now, what page in your book about Obama is that on ?
I know I read it somewhere in my studying for this debate

127 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:55:11pm

re: #84 Jimmah

I won't be watching this debate. I like Palin, but expect her to be eaten alive, again.

Why don't you just sit out life, then? What's the point in even being here?

Nice nick you have, moron.

128 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:55:57pm

re: #120 joecitizen

he was tortured for 5 plus years and didn't get lost in anger..indeed, it coukd be argued that he grew enormous balls because of it...

I find it pretty amazing that anybody could asy that John McCain doesn't have any balls.

after all he went through and how he handled it

just amazing

129 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:56:04pm

re: #124 x-wing

What? What in the hell does that mean?


either he is not a citizen or he's trying to impress us with how 'pure' he is..spit...

130 Syrah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:56:09pm

re: #85 Adrenalyn

well said, an upding for you dear poster
but will McCain let her do that.......

Palin does not need McCain's permission.

Her history does not read like she waits to be given permission.

131 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:56:12pm

re: #114 Sydney Carton

No, that's not good enough. It's asking her if she's fair. Of course Ifill will answer that she's fair, because to her, liberals are always fair.

Palin should flat out call her biased from the beginning. Palin should just call her out, call out the entire charade. And she can link it to the MSM in general trying to destroy her. Tie it to the arrogance of Charles Gibson, Katie Couric, and others.

WHY THE HELL NOT. If I were Palin, I'd fake it until standing on the stage. I would come out with the Amazon print out of her book. I would go through a littany of how the MSM is in the tank. Fuck it - when you can't win by their rules, win by your own rules.

McCain has done some crazy shit so far, bring the crazy at the VP debate.

And then Palin says that being ambushed by Obama supporters is beneath her pay grade.

132 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:56:12pm

re: #108 really grumpy big dog Johnson

The debate is in less than 48 hours.

I'm well aware of that. The internet rumor is that Biden will develop his condition sometime after the debate Thursday night.

133 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:56:37pm

re: #132 Racer X

I'm well aware of that. The internet rumor is that Biden will develop his condition sometime after the debate Thursday night.


Plug rot?

134 JohnSteele  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:08pm

And you can't leave a voice message, their voice mailbox is full.

I guess they are getting an earfull Ifill

135 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:09pm

re: #133 Shug

Plug rot?

hairball........

136 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:18pm

re: #121 Tarkus289


He keeps a lid on his temper and lets them get away with every lie and slanderous statement they make.... WIN

That's good on paper, but the dilemma is that a huge hunk of the American electorate has swallowed those lies, hook, line and sinker.

137 jwb7605  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:24pm

re: #120 joecitizen

he was tortured for 5 plus years and didn't get lost in anger..indeed, it coukd be argued that he grew enormous balls because of it...

My guess is that he did get lost in anger for a time, at least from a mental viewpoint.
The 5 years he spent as a captive basically "in solitary" allowed him to grow out of that and grow bigger than me for sure, and probably most of us on this forum.
You either do that, die, or come back a lunatic.

No offense to anybody there.

138 Pawn of the Oppressor  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:32pm

re: #111 pat

Fuck, Eide. What does it take McCain to get mad? Is he on drugs?

He's running on the Reagan model of Big Mr. Friendly. He doesn't seem to understand how unified the media efforts against him are, and how fast they respond to his every move. Look at the gyrations they went through just to Fix & Destroy Palin. They must have thrown thirty different things at her in less than 72 hours to see what would stick.

Somebody needs to get his ear and tell him that he should be thinking of the opposition as North Vietnamese anti-aircraft gunners. I'm not trying to be a jerk there, it's something he would understand. He needs to realize that he's an enemy alone in a hostile sky, against everybody ranging from teenagers with AKs to Soviet-trained professionals operating the latest and greatest missile systems, and he has to keep maneuvering, and play Wild Weasel against their Integrated Left-Wing Media Defense System to stay alive.

139 RTLM  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:32pm

re: #132 Racer X

I'm well aware of that. The internet rumor is that Biden will develop his condition sometime after the debate Thursday night.

Maybe he'll stroke out at the podium.

140 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:39pm

So is anyone going to tell me that AOL poll is fixed?

141 zombie  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:44pm

re: #126 Adrenalyn

honestly, I would include the book in every answer

Gov Palin, how would you handle the Bush-induced banking crisis ?

well Gwen, your candidate and friend, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, who you are writing a book about, had the best synopsis of my feelings on the crisis and perhaps you quoted him and me in your book

we both believe Congress needs to come together in a bipartisan way to solve the crisis

now, what page in your book about Obama is that on ?
I know I read it somewhere in my studying for this debate

Most excellent.

Seriously, the McCain camp needs to do stuff EXACTLY like that. They'd win easily.

Just freakin' lay it on the line. Incendiary.

142 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:46pm

re: #34 kynna

Is it possible that enough focus could get her replaced? I don't think so. I think that might be considered racist.

All the more reason to say a prayer that Saracuda knocks it out of the park.

Listen up lizards: In this case, all Palin really needs is one hellova terrific debate coach.

If Sarah learns how to handle her role Thursday night properly, she will simply ignore the loaded questions, bypass the accusations intended to get her unnerved and playing defense, and just go straight ahead and make a speech as good as the one she gave at the RNC convention, even if she has to give it in soundbites of two minutes each.

143 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:53pm

re: #135 Typicalwhitey

hairball........


isn't that on MSNBC?

144 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:57:54pm

re: #133 Shug

Plug rot?


LOL! That's why he makes so many gaffes.

145 Bubblehead II  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:58:02pm

Night folks. See (some of) you in the morning.

146 TheMatrix31  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:58:15pm

re: #139 RTLM

Maybe he'll stroke out at the podium.

Hell, at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if he coughed a few times heavily, just to plant the seeds.

147 Tarkus289  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:58:27pm

re: #136 Cartman

I know, it is a Win Win for them, it always is..

148 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:58:35pm

re: #140 Racer X

So is anyone going to tell me that AOL poll is fixed?

No. The Communist Poll Alarm failed to ring (must be an off quota thing). They usually come running.

149 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:58:39pm

re: #66 Syrah
Excellent post and idea.

Palin should open by congratulating Gwen on her "Pro-Obama" book deal. State up front that she knows the truth about the nature of the charade and all its implications.

I'd only add to that that Palin should congratulate Gwen on her new book “Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.”

150 Omni  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:58:43pm

Palin should definitely have a book rejoinder prepared in case the mod trys an obviously ridiculous gotcha question.

151 jwb7605  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:59:07pm

re: #140 Racer X

So is anyone going to tell me that AOL poll is fixed?

Of course it's fixed.
Feel better now?

I have no idea why it might be fixed. I just wanted to make you feel better.

Since when did conservatives start hanging out at AOL?

152 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:59:19pm

re: #84 Jimmah

She could get beat, she could win...remember she is up against a guy that has every tendancy to melt down.

I think Vegas is setting the over/under for "Biden Embarrassing Gaffes" at 3.5. (Hint: Take the over)

I think the over/under on "Biden Condesending Remarks" is now at 6.5. Safest money in the world (other than at AIG, Fannie and Freddie now that we all own them) is to take the OVER.

I could retire on this stuff...

...until Obama taxes me into a cardboard box drinking Nighttrain and lighting my own gas on fire for warmth...or, wait, is that life under "single payer"?

153 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:59:19pm

re: #144 newsjunkie_ky

LOL! That's why he makes so many gaffes.


Yep. they used a number 5 plug augor when they only needed a number 2.

some of em went so deep they came out as chest hair

154 x-wing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:59:25pm

re: #125 Typicalwhitey

Wow, I just cannot debate such a thought provoking and thoroughly parsed out and sourced post such as this one.

Bravo pat!

He must have went to the Ron White school of debating. :>}

155 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 9:59:30pm

re: #139 RTLM

Maybe he'll stroke out at the podium.

Too dramatic, and he is not that good of an actor.

I honestly hope he is OK and this is not a real illness. Especially since it has been planned since the day McCain announced Palin as his VP.

156 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:00:25pm

re: #119 pat

Fuck off

It's not like you didn't ask for it, fool.

157 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:00:35pm

re: #130 Syrah

Palin does not need McCain's permission.

Her history does not read like she waits to be given permission.

I would most respectfully disagree. It is her job to help get him elected, and not vice-versa.

158 Mr. Pulpo  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:00:48pm

It would sure be interesting to see Christopher Hitchens as a debate moderator for all the debates.

159 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:00:50pm

re: #77 stuiec

Stuiec - my apologies - I hadn't read your comment when I made my comment #149. Great idea!

160 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:00:57pm

re: #153 Shug

Yep. they used a number 5 plug augor when they only needed a number 2.

some of em went so deep they came out as chest hair

And where will you be performing this weekend? You have cheered me up tonight. I thank you.

161 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:01:46pm

re: #151 jwb7605

Of course it's fixed.
Feel better now?

I have no idea why it might be fixed. I just wanted to make you feel better.

Since when did conservatives start hanging out at AOL?

Bingo!

And thanks for wanting to make me feel better!

LOL!

162 JohnSteele  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:01:59pm

re: #112 Wishing

Do you think they care?


No, but I do

163 Jimmah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:06pm

re: #127 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Why don't you just sit out life, then? What's the point in even being here?

Nice nick you have, moron.

I am not opting out of life just because I'm disappointed with the ease with which Palin has been taken apart by one interviewer after another, and have no appetite to watch a repeat performance!

You are the moron.

164 rawmuse  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:06pm

re: #158 Mr. Pulpo

Or Mark Steyn.

165 RememberSekhmet?  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:12pm

It looks like the Democrats are pulling out all the stops and calling in every favor they have for this election.

So what happens if they lose this one anyway?

166 hazzyday  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:14pm

What this guarantees is that there will be no push to get at the truth of the Sen. Obama side. Nothing will be touched or revealed that will upset the Sen. Obama applecart.

The MSM is no longer the same, it needs to be pushed like a negative opponent. A 527 needs to publicize and layout the media bias and just who can be trusted to be impartial.

McCain on the view was subjected to negative body language for the benefit of their viewers. A lot of this Obamabot effort is to scam the McCain campaign by associating passive negatives with any public image.

A peace sign for Obama becomes rabbit ears for McCain while telling his campaign advisers they just didn't move their hand out of the way fast enough.

167 x-wing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:21pm

re: #129 joecitizen

either he is not a citizen or he's trying to impress us with how 'pure' he is..spit...

Maybe a felon not residing in Florida?

168 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:31pm

re: #114 Sydney Carton

No, that's not good enough. It's asking her if she's fair. Of course Ifill will answer that she's fair, because to her, liberals are always fair.

Palin should flat out call her biased from the beginning. Palin should just call her out, call out the entire charade. And she can link it to the MSM in general trying to destroy her. Tie it to the arrogance of Charles Gibson, Katie Couric, and others.

In the situation she faces, Palin's best bet is to announce to the viewers at home that Gwen Ifill has a vast conflict of interest and is totally in the tank for Obama. Nothing will make Ifill fair, but if she knows that Palin is on to her and hears Palin tell the entire viewing audience that she's on to her, she will be forced either to pretend to be fair -- or to drop all pretense and show the world how biased she is.

169 cliffster  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:38pm

re: #55 brainwizard73

Palin should bring a copy of the book out and ask Gwen to sign it for her at the beginning of the debate...

...wouldn't that be sweet?

That sounds like some McCain shit to do. Dang, I hope she mentions it. "Can I get a preview copy of that book? What's it called?"

170 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:40pm

re: #160 newsjunkie_ky

And where will you be performing this weekend? You have cheered me up tonight. I thank you.


just returning the favor

171 kahall  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:48pm

re: #140 Racer X

So is anyone going to tell me that AOL poll is fixed?

No, but how does it work? They are easy to fix. No?

172 Wishing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:51pm

re: #119 pat

no, YOU fuck off, you miserable old fart!

173 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:51pm

Ifill will be to Biden as training wheels are to a bicycle.

174 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:02:57pm

re: #158 Mr. Pulpo

It would sure be interesting to see Christopher Hitchens as a debate moderator for all the debates.

A few other options?

Lewis Black
Penn Gillette
Dennis Miller
A lit up Bob Costas?

175 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:03:53pm

re: #158 Mr. Pulpo

It would sure be interesting to see Christopher Hitchens as a debate moderator for all the debates.


after a two hour open bar

176 Syrah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:03:56pm

re: #150 Omni

Palin should definitely have a book rejoinder prepared in case the mod trys an obviously ridiculous gotcha question.

No need to wait. This debate was designed as an ambush from the get-go.

Palin should come out "a guns a blazing" rhetorically speaking. Nothing to lose by playing to win.

177 Jimmah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:04:16pm

re: #152 brainwizard73

True, with a bit of luck Biden could eclipse whatever gaffes she is forced into.

178 Wishing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:04:23pm

sorry, i lost my kewl...

179 Pawn of the Oppressor  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:04:31pm

re: #158 Mr. Pulpo

It would sure be interesting to see Christopher Hitchens as a debate moderator for all the debates.

"Now the next question is one any fool with a third-rate education should be able to answer, but since you are all such terrible, disappointing people, I place my expectations at the level of a pile of whale shit in the Marianas trench.... Oh don't look so f-cking angry, Joe... Sit down and shut up while I ask you this question..."

180 cliffster  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:04:42pm

We're gonna change the world
Obama's gonna lead 'em
Yes we can can can can

181 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:04:43pm

re: #163 Jimmah

I am not opting out of life just because I'm disappointed with the ease with which Palin has been taken apart by one interviewer after another, and have no appetite to watch a repeat performance!

You are the moron.

You already have opted out, you just can't admit it to yourself yet.

182 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:04:54pm

re: #173 solomonpanting

Rusty, squeaky and something to take off before you want to look cool?

183 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:04:56pm

re: #165 RememberSekhmet?

It looks like the Democrats are pulling out all the stops and calling in every favor they have for this election.

So what happens if they lose this one anyway?

arm yerself if ya go anywhere near the inner city is my guess...

184 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:05:03pm

re: #171 kahall

No, but how does it work? They are easy to fix. No?

If that was the case - wouldn't the fix go the other way?

185 JohnSteele  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:05:11pm

re: #110 Racer X

Oh, and for you doom and gloomers who think Obama will have sleepovers in the white house sometime in 2009 - suck on this.

AOL poll:
McCain - 61%
Obama - 39%

Total straw poll votes - 355,659.

Internet polls are notoriously inaccurate. The strange thing here is that its usually the lefty nutroot that stack these things yet McCain is way, way out in front in every state --- can't be right
.

186 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:05:33pm

re: #172 Wishing

I am not old.

187 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:05:38pm

stand up Gwen, let em see ya !

188 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:04pm

how is ifill pronounced?

189 Wishing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:05pm

re: #186 pat

coulda fooled me

190 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:08pm

re: #182 brainwizard73

Rusty, squeaky and something to take off before you want to look cool?


Something to prevent a fall.

191 Irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:15pm

Here's my very rude letter.

Dear Ms. Brown,

The Drudge Report has broken the story tonight that Gwen Ifill, moderator of the vice-presidential debate on October 2, is publishing a book entitled The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama the day after the election.

I do not understand how this person was chosen to be moderator when she has a financial interest in the outcome of the election.

Either she knowingly kept this information from your organization, in which case she should be replaced immediately due to conflict of interest, or your organization knew about this before pronouncing her moderate and found nothing troubling about it.

So, who is corrupt here? Gwen or the organization that you serve?

Your organization is supposed to be serving the good of the American people. You need to deal with this matter immediately by dismissing Gwen Ifill.

And I shouldn't have to be writing you to tell you that.

Grow up and act like a responsible adult already.


You too can write one. Address it to jb@debates.org

192 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:29pm

Going to bed now....Been up 24 hours waiting for my grandson to be born.It was worth every minute. Really puts in perspective what is important. What is important to me for my family is that Obama needs to be defeated. Keep up the good fight all of you. God Bless.

193 Oldasdirt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:37pm

Not sure when i first came here,couple of months back i think,,maybe more.For a long time never said nothing,or i guess i should say wrote anything.I just read.Did it along time.Lots of debates,some of which i could take either side on.But all sane and responsible.Last couple of weeks i have noticed alot of strange post.
Here my thoughts on Pat,Eide,and a few others. I think they have been sent in as disrupter's.Ill will mongers.Best thing to do,is ignor them.They will soon get bored and go away.

194 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:38pm

re: #170 Shug

just returning the favor

favor?

195 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:44pm

re: #186 pat

I am not old.

We can tell.
Hey I think your mama is calling, time to change your knickers.

196 merrytexas  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:06:50pm

grumpy, Intrepid and racer, I went back and did a mea culpa on the math on the other thread. Long day. What was I thinking?/slapping myself.

197 Syrah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:07:05pm

re: #188 Typicalwhitey

how is ifill pronounced?

Like a variation of offal.

198 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:07:19pm

re: #194 newsjunkie_ky

favor?


yep. you always make me smile

199 kahall  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:07:41pm

re: #184 Racer X

If that was the case - wouldn't the fix go the other way?


Usually. Should I be giddy then? A little tingly? It does seem strange.
I have noticed that the digg monkeys have taken over the Buzz up thing from yahoo that LGF has here as well.

200 cliffster  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:07:46pm

re: #192 nigella

Going to bed now....Been up 24 hours waiting for my grandson to be born.It was worth every minute. Really puts in perspective what is important. What is important to me for my family is that Obama needs to be defeated. Keep up the good fight all of you. God Bless.

Congratulations, nigella! And roger that, the good fight.

201 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:07:51pm

re: #159 realwest

No apologies necessary - several commenters here came up with the same idea at the same time.

202 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:07:52pm

re: #174 brainwizard73

I like your alternate choices for moderator, with the exception of Costas. His vehicle went way left-of-center a long time ago.

203 RoughRider  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:07:57pm

"Governor Palin, since Alaska is so white, why should African-Americans like me trust someone like you to look out for them?"

"Senator Biden, can you possibly relate to the audience here and at home just how awesome and humbling it is to get to campaign with an real American hero adored by millions around the world like Barack Obama?"

204 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:08:06pm

re: #185 JohnSteele

Internet polls are notoriously inaccurate. The strange thing here is that its usually the lefty nutroot that stack these things yet McCain is way, way out in front in every state --- can't be right
.

I cannot imagine there was a concerted effort on the left to falsely rig the AOL poll to show McCain blowing Obama away. I doubt conservatives would rig the poll either - with work and all.

205 FlakMusic  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:08:13pm

Blatant.

Unprofessional.

Without integrity.

All that's needed now to codify liberal media bias as the law of the land is The Fairness Doctrine.

Double-plus ungood.

206 Killer Tomato  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:08:27pm
207 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:08:40pm

re: #185 JohnSteele
Somebody said this same poll was right on the money in '04.

208 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:08:41pm

re: #168 stuiec

In the situation she faces, Palin's best bet is to announce to the viewers at home that Gwen Ifill has a vast conflict of interest and is totally in the tank for Obama. Nothing will make Ifill fair, but if she knows that Palin is on to her and hears Palin tell the entire viewing audience that she's on to her, she will be forced either to pretend to be fair -- or to drop all pretense and show the world how biased she is.

you know the Democrats are wondering which way we are going to fall for this bait: the next day, would we rather they call our team losers or whiners? We respond, they decide.

209 Steffan  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:08:51pm

If there's a plus, it's that if they know about her bias, they can make allowances for it.

If they're really feeling yeasty, they can outline and highlight her biases.

God willing, they can even minimize, trivialize and destroy her biases.

Praemonitus, praemunitus.

(as Captain Blood would say, forewarned, forearmed.)

:)

210 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:09:23pm

re: #196 merrytexas

grumpy, Intrepid and racer, I went back and did a mea culpa on the math on the other thread. Long day. What was I thinking?/slapping myself.

People get sucked in all the time on the multiplication of big numbers. Don't lose sleep over it. You were just reporting what people who should know better than not check their facts were saying.

Sleep tight, and don't let the bedbugs bite!

211 Reluctant Democrat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:09:29pm

Sarah should definitely bring it up!

212 thebronze  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:09:31pm

I'm pretty sure Gwen Ifill doesn't have enough personal integrity to step down.

213 zombie  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:09:41pm

Sarah Palin: "Gwen Ifill, I knew Edward R. Murrow; I served with Edward R. Murrow; and you are no Edward R. Murrow."

214 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:09:44pm

re: #138 Pawn of the Oppressor With all respect, to you and to Pat, someone ought to tell McCain to shut up with the biparisan bullshit - the Dem's dont' want bipartisanship, they[Link: www.imeem.com...]
And he has to want it more than do they.

215 kahall  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:09:51pm

re: #206 Killer Tomato

cheer up!

Reminds me of Sat. night at grampa's.

216 merrytexas  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:09:57pm

re: #192 nigella

Congratulations!

217 Sydney Carton  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:10:10pm
In the situation she faces, Palin's best bet is to announce to the viewers at home that Gwen Ifill has a vast conflict of interest and is totally in the tank for Obama. Nothing will make Ifill fair, but if she knows that Palin is on to her and hears Palin tell the entire viewing audience that she's on to her, she will be forced either to pretend to be fair -- or to drop all pretense and show the world how biased she is.

Agreed. Palin should just lay it out in front of all of the viewers:

Fellow Americans, thank you for the opportunity to participate in this debate. Before we begin, I must make all of you aware of an unfortunate event. The moderator of this debate, Ms. Gwen Ifill, is selling a book that promotes our opponent, Barack Obama, as president and is actually entitled the "Age of Obama." The book is scheduled to come out on what she hopes is Barack Obama's presidential inauguration. I want all of you at home to know that despite the obvious financial conflict of interest of the moderator, I have appeared tonight in order to present my case to you. I also will not be bullied by biased journalists who write books in favor of my opponent and then pretend to be objective. Thank you.

218 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:10:10pm

re: #196 merrytexas

grumpy, Intrepid and racer, I went back and did a mea culpa on the math on the other thread. Long day. What was I thinking?/slapping myself.

It's all good.

:-)

219 Opilio  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:10:44pm

re: #139 RTLM

Maybe he'll stroke out at the podium.

a la Kevin Kline towards the end of Dave

220 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:11:07pm

re: #198 Shug

Oh, Shug. You gonna make me cry now. Quick say something funny.

221 JohnSteele  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:11:08pm

re: #204 Racer X

I cannot imagine there was a concerted effort on the left to falsely rig the AOL poll to show McCain blowing Obama away. I doubt conservatives would rig the poll either - with work and all.

That's what's so strange about it.

222 jwb7605  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:11:21pm

nite all.

223 mattm  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:11:36pm

To the MSM this is not conflict of interest.

224 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:11:42pm

There once was a mod name of Ifill
As a lib, well she knows the drill
Give a pass to ol' plugs
While beatin' up jugs
Cause she swallowed the Obama pill

225 Jimmah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:11:47pm

re: #181 really grumpy big dog Johnson

You already have opted out, you just can't admit it to yourself yet.

I didn't come to here to get into aggro with the dumbest twit on the thread. It's late for me anyway. So long, asshole.

226 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:11:55pm

re: #202 Cartman

I like your alternate choices for moderator, with the exception of Costas. His vehicle went way left-of-center a long time ago.

That is why I made him "lit-up". Face it, a drunken dwarf that could gloss over the Chinese human rights story as well as he did would be funny as hell.

Not enlightening, but funny.

227 kahall  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:00pm

re: #204 Racer X

................. I doubt conservatives would rig the poll either - with work and all.

LOL!

228 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:10pm

re: #220 newsjunkie_ky

Oh, Shug. You gonna make me cry now. Quick say something funny.

moderators don't matter...how's that?

229 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:12pm

re: #220 newsjunkie_ky

Oh, Shug. You gonna make me cry now. Quick say something funny.

Did you hear the one about the guy with five penises?

His pants fit like a glove.

/Newbomb Turk

230 spirochete  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:20pm

“Senator Biden, your brilliant suggestion for Iraq was to divide the country into three parts. That would have guaranteed endless war and endless death in Iraq for a century. Your judgment was wrong, and all your foreign policy experience didn’t help that much, did it?”

231 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:25pm

re: #174 brainwizard73

A few other options?

Lewis Black
Penn Gillette
Dennis Miller
A lit up Bob Costas?

That might be funny and actually informative. I'd cast Black and Miller as moderators. I'd love to see the the questions they'd ask. A highlight would be Black asking McCain whether Bill Ayers or Jeremiah Wright is the root of all evil.

232 RememberSekhmet?  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:25pm

re: #180 cliffster

We're gonna change the world
Obama's gonna lead 'em
Yes we can can can can

You forgot the rest of the verses:

The sun on the meadow is summery warm
The stag in the forest runs free
But gathered together to greet the storm
Tomorrow belongs to me

The branch on the linden is leafy and green
The Rhine gives its gold to the sea (Gold to the sea)
But somewhere a glory awaits unseen
Tomorrow belongs to me

Now Fatherland, Fatherland, show us the sign
Your children have waited to see
The morning will come
When the world is mine
Tomorrow belongs to me
Tomorrow belongs to me
Tomorrow belongs to me
Tomorrow belongs to me

233 JohnSteele  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:32pm

re: #207 newsjunkie_ky

Somebody said this same poll was right on the money in '04.

It would be a joy if this were the case but I remain sceptical --- the elfties are usually all over these Internet polls and there is no way they's stack it like this :-)

234 Archimedes  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:12:32pm

re: #64 RTLM

She can have the first 45 minutes and Rush Limbaugh can have the last 45 minutes.

(highest ratings ever, MSM...)

/and fair is fair dammit.

Fair is fair. Strangely, that would be fair.

235 x-wing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:13:06pm

Typicalwhitey.

Ifill is pronounced like that big tower in France.

236 Badge of Kaffir Pride  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:13:11pm

re: #40 Irene NYC

From the comments at Amazon:

Okay, Lizards, here's all the info. Let's stop whining and hop to it!
;)

I'm Canadian and I left a message asking if anyone was going to say anything about the mod writing a pro-Obama book.

237 Irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:14:23pm

re: #236 Badge of Kaffir Pride
It's so nice to have friendly, helpful neighbors!
;)

238 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:15:04pm

re: #228 joecitizen

moderators don't matter...how's that?


For what it is worth. I think we should email this to everyone. Let America know what the situation is going in to the debate. Sarah should not say anything about this. We should.

239 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:15:06pm

re: #212 thebronze

I'm pretty sure Gwen Ifill doesn't have enough personal integrity to step down.

You know that is really the issue here. A good journalist would want to avoid the mere appearance of a conflict of interest...never mind a real conflict. The fact that Gwen is more interested in selling her book than maintaining the appearance of objectivity (what there can be of it) really tells you all you need to know about her.

If I were Gwen, I would not accept the job...but then, she isn't in this for a real debate...right Governor "you handle snakes while gutting your moose" Palin?

240 TheMatrix31  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:15:13pm

re: #217 Sydney Carton

Agreed. Palin should just lay it out in front of all of the viewers:

Fellow Americans, thank you for the opportunity to participate in this debate. Before we begin, I must make all of you aware of an unfortunate event. The moderator of this debate, Ms. Gwen Ifill, is selling a book that promotes our opponent, Barack Obama, as president and is actually entitled the "Age of Obama." The book is scheduled to come out on what she hopes is Barack Obama's presidential inauguration. I want all of you at home to know that despite the obvious financial conflict of interest of the moderator, I have appeared tonight in order to present my case to you. I also will not be bullied by biased journalists who write books in favor of my opponent and then pretend to be objective. Thank you.

That would definitely send tingles down my legs.

241 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:15:41pm
242 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:15:50pm

re: #229 Shug

Did you hear the one about the guy with five penises?

His pants fit like a glove.

/Newbomb Turk

I'm not 'touching' that one.

243 right_on_target  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:15:58pm

If anyone ever goes to angryjournalist.com they can read a lot of comments from anonymous journalists who vent their frustrations. Here is one that I find is spot on.
Italics are mine.

I, not with my desire, but with the Grace of God was given a “BUY-OUT” effective 12/31/06. I spent my entire life with and around newspaper people. I have “ink” flowing through my veins. My dad was an “Eclipse” award winning sports columist. His counsel to me as a teen was to enter the newspaper business but not in his department, due to the potential of unjust peer pressure. I worked my way up from advertising copy boy to advertising rep. I enjoyed a very rewarding and successful 36 year advertising career. What is happening to our profession to me, is like watching a relative die. I don’t believe in the game blame. The main reason this is taking place is the internet, satellite, and cable television. There is a boat load of information generating options, many of which are biased, innaccurate and or false. If newspapers go back to the basics- leaving their personal bias and agends at the door, many will survive. With all of the above in mind - at this date I would suggest that you pursue a secondary career path. I wish you all the best. Ad Man.

244 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:15:59pm

re: #238 newsjunkie_ky

For what it is worth. I think we should email this to everyone. Let America know what the situation is going in to the debate. Sarah should not say anything about this. We should.

I was going for the funny there..

245 Querent  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:16:18pm

re: #165 RememberSekhmet?

It looks like the Democrats are pulling out all the stops and calling in every favor they have for this election.

So what happens if they lose this one anyway?

They get Post-Obama Stress Disorder

246 Adrenalyn  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:16:36pm

re: #141 zombie

Most excellent.

Seriously, the McCain camp needs to do stuff EXACTLY like that. They'd win easily.

Just freakin' lay it on the line. Incendiary.

this is why American needs ME as "Secretary of Offense"
my nic tells the way my old chums viewed me and my actions

247 jcw46  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:16:49pm

Sent my email to jb@debates.org;

Haven't we seen enough, or not seen anything as the case may be, to recognize that many in the news media are Obama supporters?
Even those who have managed to not express openly their desire for Obama to win are still showing (by way of attitude and the seriousness of the questions for Palin compared to the easy or non-existent questions for Obama and Biden) a degree of double standard that was only surmised to exist.
How's this; find a conservative media person (not a self-proclaimed one) to do the moderation?
To let this sort of blatant disregard for objectivity continue is a
disservice to your fellow citizens.
248 Intrepid  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:17:17pm

re: #196 merrytexas

grumpy, Intrepid and racer, I went back and did a mea culpa on the math on the other thread. Long day. What was I thinking?/slapping myself.

Heh - no worries. I sure would have enjoyed a cool mil in the bank, though.

249 Racer X  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:17:23pm

I hate to see it, but there is a bunch of radical right-wingers posting some pretty wild crap over on the AOL poll comments.

250 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:17:36pm

re: #233 JohnSteele

It would be a joy if this were the case but I remain sceptical --- the elfties are usually all over these Internet polls and there is no way they's stack it like this :-)

I tried to vote and it kept asking me to type in the code. I must have not seen the code right because after 3 trys I quit.

251 Opilio  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:17:44pm

re: #191 Irene NYC

Here's my very rude letter.

You too can write one. Address it to jb@debates.org

Mine was more terse.

I urge you to replace Gwen Ifill as moderator of the upcoming Vice Presidential debate. It is absurd to assume that she can or will put aside her documented bias toward the Obama campaign. Allowing her to remain as moderator will irreparably taint the debate, and cast grave doubts on the impartiality of the CPD itself.
252 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:17:46pm

re: #239 brainwizard73

You know that is really the issue here. A good journalist would want to avoid the mere appearance of a conflict of interest...never mind a real conflict. The fact that Gwen is more interested in selling her book than maintaining the appearance of objectivity (what there can be of it) really tells you all you need to know about her.

If I were Gwen, I would not accept the job...but then, she isn't in this for a real debate...right Governor "you handle snakes while gutting your moose" Palin?


I'll go one step further.
gwen feels she is an agent of change in the Obama army. A secret agent ( she is the only one who thinks it's a secret now though )
Hell, it is her duty to moderate this debate and frame it to make Palin look bad, all while appearing to be objective.
She is doing what she thinks is right for the universe

253 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:17:50pm

re: #217 Sydney Carton
Hey Sidney - good to "see" you again!
BTW, and with no disrespect intended at all, I think you should read #77 by stuiec. I think he's about got it perfect!

254 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:18:09pm

There was a mod name of Ifill
Who thought with the 'cuda she'd trifle
Trick her she tried
I'm sunk! she cried
Brought down by the trusty moose rifle

255 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:18:21pm

re: #236 Badge of Kaffir Pride

I'm Canadian and I left a message asking if anyone was going to say anything about the mod writing a pro-Obama book.

I hope you threatened the stoppage of all future back bacon exports to the U.S. unless she steps down. ;)

256 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:18:45pm

Racer x, can you really be sure they are radical right-wingers? Could they be plants?

257 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:18:48pm

re: #242 newsjunkie_ky

I'm not 'touching' that one.

You could at least give me a hand.

a round of applause, of course


/

258 irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:18:50pm

re: #243 right_on_target

Well, the New York Sun went out of business yesterday. It was a wonderful, fact-based publication that put the NYTimes to shame.

It is not enough for a paper to be just factual. The citizens of the city need to support it.

Unfortunately, New Yorkers are just a bunch of parochial snobs who only want to hear their own opinions shouted back at them.

259 Opilio  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:18:51pm

re: #224 Typicalwhitey

There once was a mod name of Ifill
As a lib, well she knows the drill
Give a pass to ol' plugs
While beatin' up jugs
Cause she swallowed the Obama pill

Ahem... Jugs?

260 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:19:30pm

I imagine Gwen's book on the Golden Age of Obama is nothing more than an Ifill Tower of Babble.

261 irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:20:24pm

re: #251 Opilio

Wonderful! Great letter.
;)

262 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:20:43pm

re: #244 joecitizen

I was going for the funny there..


I haven't sleep much, sorry I missed it. Sometimes when I'm tired, funny goes over my head.

263 Ojoe  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:20:47pm

Worth checking out post 833 on previous thread.

264 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:20:52pm

re: #176 Syrah
Hey Syrah - spot on and I think No need to wait. This debate was designed as an ambush from the get-go.

Palin should come out "a guns a blazing" rhetorically speaking. Nothing to lose by playing to win.

would be best exemplified by what stuiec said at #77 and I unwittingly said the same thing at #149!

265 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:20:55pm

re: #254 Typicalwhitey

I hereby give thanks to the gods of poetry for this bountiful feast.

266 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:20:55pm

re: #165 RememberSekhmet?

It looks like the Democrats are pulling out all the stops and calling in every favor they have for this election.

So what happens if they lose this one anyway?

Always be prepared. My alt location is stocked, in the mountains ... will probably go there on 11/3. If anyone is near a metro Dem area, not to be paranoid, but get a few things together, just in case. Make sure you can get to a safe haven.

This feels like a balls to the wall insurgency by the left. I wouldn't be surprised if there were riots and looting in the metro blue cities.

267 Archimedes  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:21:02pm

re: #151 jwb7605

Of course it's fixed.
Feel better now?

I have no idea why it might be fixed. I just wanted to make you feel better.

Since when did conservatives start hanging out at AOL?

In the early days of the Internet (or early in terms of when it was commercialized), the Internet was heavily libertarian/conservative. I acquired my first Internet account in late 1994 and at that time the existence of the Internet was known by only a small fraction of the population. Now, pretty much everyone is on it, so the prior demographic has changed dramatically.

Okay, where am I going with this thought? I don't know, just wondering what the demographic of AOL is. When AOLers first came on line they were made fun of, which was silly.

268 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:21:18pm

re: #260 solomonpanting

I imagine Gwen's book on the Golden Age of Obama is nothing more than an Ifill Tower of Babble.

Brilliant.


or how about

The left-leaning tower of Appeasa

269 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:21:31pm

re: #259 Opilio

Its the only word I could think of that rhymes with plugs lol

254 is better

270 Sydney Carton  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:21:32pm

Hi realwest! Nice to see you too. I think at a minimum, Palin should mention this in the beginning to make sure all Americans know what she's up against.

Going to bed now, got a 8:30 client meeting tomorrow. I haven't been to bed early at all this past week. Every time I go to bed, Drudge posts another headline that keeps me up. Damn liberals. See you later.

271 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:22:46pm

I am over my anger. And my shock that one of you thought me old.

272 lifeofthemind  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:22:51pm

Evening,
So do they plan to replace Gwen Ifill with Whoopie?
Still so unhappy about the loss of the Sun.

273 irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:09pm

re: #267 Archimedes

Yeah, I remember that too. AOL-ers were people who didn't know DOS or how to get around on the web without hand-holding.
;)

274 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:12pm

re: #243 right_on_target

If anyone ever goes to angryjournalist.com they can read a lot of comments from anonymous journalists who vent their frustrations. Here is one that I find is spot on.....

I admire former Democrat strategist and pollster Pat Cadell for his own forthrightness in calling the current newsmedia out for their outrageously biased reporting editorializing in the same way.

275 Ojoe  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:12pm

re: #108 really grumpy big dog Johnson

Now that rumor is political kool-aid IMHO.

276 Syrah  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:16pm

So if all of this heavy handed media manipulation has gotten you down in anyway, it's time for a timeout.

277 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:35pm

re: #271 pat

I am over my anger. And my shock that one of you thought me old.

No one cares

278 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:51pm

Any chance Gwen Ifill has a "whitey rant" tape out there?

279 Archimedes  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:54pm

re: #272 lifeofthemind

Evening,
So do they plan to replace Gwen Ifill with Whoopie?
Still so unhappy about the loss of the Sun.

I saw the Sun today. High up in the sky. Did something happen?

280 Badge of Kaffir Pride  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:23:55pm

re: #255 Cartman

I hope you threatened the stoppage of all future back bacon exports to the U.S. unless she steps down. ;)

We couldn't ruin breakfast for so many people...

281 irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:24:03pm

re: #272 lifeofthemind

Were you a NY Sun reader then?

282 Ojoe  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:24:33pm

re: #271 pat

What is old?

I Ask, in my 59th year.

283 irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:25:01pm

re: #279 Archimedes

I saw the Sun today. High up in the sky. Did something happen?


Yeah, the New York Sun ceased publication today (yesterday).

285 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:25:43pm

re: #257 Shug

You could at least give me a hand.

a round of applause, of course


/


rimshot

286 Opilio  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:25:47pm

re: #269 Typicalwhitey

Its the only word I could think of that rhymes with plugs lol

254 is better

I'm not sayin' 224 didn't make me smile... but you're right, 254 is better ;)

287 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:25:48pm

Ojoe, you and I are the same age Amazing that two people our age are still alive!

288 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:26:00pm

re: #267 Archimedes
Well the early AOL er's were probably made fun of the early "geeks" who would have been notoriously lefty
(no, obviously not Charles)!

289 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:26:04pm

re: #282 Ojoe

What is old?

I Ask, in my 59th year.

I dunno but I'd be readin' me some Dylan Thomas right about now...

290 Celtic Templar  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:26:08pm

re: #273 irene NYC

Yeah, I remember that too. AOL-ers were people who didn't know DOS or how to get around on the web without hand-holding.
;)

From my experience, AOLers are the boomer generation and older ... you know, the people who actually vote (and vote consistently)

291 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:26:28pm

re: #284 Typicalwhitey

EXCLUSIVE: Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds
$99,000 for rent, utilities, accounting fees

snip:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying a spouse with political donations that she voted to ban last year.
292 Archimedes  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:26:30pm

re: #283 irene NYC

Yeah, the New York Sun ceased publication today (yesterday).

That's too bad. They did good work. IIRC, they were in business a very long time ago. Went out of business, came back. Then went out not long ago, and came back again. And now they have gone out again.

Is the New York Times far behind?

293 BakaRanger  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:26:35pm

Gwen Ifill asking fair questions of both VP candidates:

"Sen. Biden can you tell me the name of the ship that was sunk by an iceberg?"

"Uh, the Titanic?"

"That's is a remarkable and astute answer Mr. Biden, you are of course correct".

"Now a question for Ms. Palin, Governor can you name all of the passengers?"

294 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:26:39pm

re: #262 newsjunkie_ky
I am tired. SLEPT, SLEPT.
PIMF

295 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:27:22pm

re: #287 nigella
HA!

Ojoe, you and I are the same age Amazing that two people our age are still alive!

I'm older than either of you! LOL!

296 Ojoe  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:27:31pm

re: #287 nigella

LOL !

297 Archimedes  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:27:49pm

re: #288 realwest

Well the early AOL er's were probably made fun of the early "geeks" who would have been notoriously lefty
(no, obviously not Charles)!

No, I think they were more libertarian. You can do usenet searches that go pretty far back and check out some of the conversations.

298 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:27:53pm

re: #276 Syrah

So if all of this heavy handed media manipulation has gotten you down in anyway, it's time for a timeout.

That was hilarious! Man, there's some darn stupid people out there!

299 Typicalwhitey  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:27:54pm

re: #295 realwest

HA!


I'm older than either of you! LOL!

Is your real name dirt?

/runs from room

300 Shug  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:28:17pm

re: #291 Typicalwhitey

well that wasn't very patriotic of her

301 lifeofthemind  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:28:31pm

Pardon but I just had a thought. Isn't Ifill employed by PBS? Isn't that the Public Broadcasting Service? Aren't there rules about misusing your public office for private gain? Ifill can write a book or take an outside gig but she cannot trade on her office to arrange publicity that increases her income from the book. Anything that would cast Palin in a bad light would mean money for Ifill. It is impossible for her to function as an honest moderator and her agencies ethics board needs to investigate this.

302 realwest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:28:50pm

Well all y'all it's been grand as usual but I HAVE to get some sleep NOW.
So I hope you all have a GREAT EVENING/EARLY MORNING and that I get the chance to see you down the road!


Goodnight, all.

303 Wishing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:28:50pm

re: #276 Syrah

So if all of this heavy handed media manipulation has gotten you down in anyway, it's time for a timeout.

I volunteer in 911 dispatch..all true! lol

304 nigella  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:28:55pm

And by the way Pat, old is only how you see yourself. I see myself as a young, happy fortunate mother of two and Grandmother of four.Grateful of all God has given me and hopeful for many more years. You seem old of spirit and heart. I feel sorry for you.

305 HelloDare  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:29:27pm

re: #263 Ojoe

Worth checking out post 833 on previous thread.

Thanks for pointing it out. Here it is for other people.
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

306 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:30:11pm

re: #284 Typicalwhitey

EXCLUSIVE: Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds
$99,000 for rent, utilities, accounting fees


Queen Bee and the culture of corruption. She should resign but dems NEVER resign no matter what they do.

307 Archimedes  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:30:21pm

re: #302 realwest

Well all y'all it's been grand as usual but I HAVE to get some sleep NOW.
So I hope you all have a GREAT EVENING/EARLY MORNING and that I get the chance to see you down the road!


Goodnight, all.

Good night to you RealWest! always nice to see you around.

308 Intrepid  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:30:36pm

re: #284 Typicalwhitey

EXCLUSIVE: Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds
$99,000 for rent, utilities, accounting fees

From the article:

Democrats are committed to reforming the way Washington does business," Mrs. Pelosi said in a press release at the time.

I'm so impressed with your "most ethical congress in history", Nancy. You're sure doing your part, aren't you?

309 freedomplow  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:30:40pm

Provable vested interest in the outcome of the debate.

310 joecitizen  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:30:46pm

re: #304 nigella

And by the way Pat, old is only how you see yourself. I see myself as a young, happy fortunate mother of two and Grandmother of four.Grateful of all God has given me and hopeful for many more years. You seem old of spirit and heart. I feel sorry for you.

some people just don't get the poetry...g'night sweet Lizards..may all yer dreams be scaley...

311 Oldasdirt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:30:52pm

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying a spouse with political donations that she voted to ban last year.
Just saw this on Drudge

312 Cartman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:30:54pm

G'nite, R-Dubs.

313 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:31:09pm

re: #284 Typicalwhitey

EXCLUSIVE: Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds
$99,000 for rent, utilities, accounting fees

Pelosi: "But I thought PAC stood for Pelosi's Accessible Cash."

314 Querent  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:31:28pm

re: #304 nigella

And by the way Pat, old is only how you see yourself. I see myself as a young, happy fortunate mother of two and Grandmother of four.Grateful of all God has given me and hopeful for many more years. You seem old of spirit and heart. I feel sorry for you.

both of you -- the secret to having a long life is to be willing to get older.

(Deep Thought of the Day™)

315 EIDE_Interface  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:31:38pm

All I have to say about McCain - total and complete incompetence if he doesn't get this "moderator" pulled.

316 x-wing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:32:15pm

re: #299 Typicalwhitey

Is your real name dirt?

/runs from room

He remembers when the Dead Sea was only sick.

/duck,dodge ,dip, running like hell

317 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:32:21pm

re: #291 Typicalwhitey


snip:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying a spouse with political donations that she voted to ban last year.

Now I understand why Nancy saw "absolutely no reason" why Charlie Rangel should step down.

318 irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:32:35pm

re: #290 Celtic Templar

From my experience, AOLers are the boomer generation and older ... you know, the people who actually vote (and vote consistently)

Whoa Sweetie! Twas the boomers that pretty much put the web together. AOL-ers were grandparents and people who didn't know how to use computers (some of whom, of course, were boomers).
;)

319 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:32:40pm

re: #302 realwest

Well all y'all it's been grand as usual but I HAVE to get some sleep NOW.
So I hope you all have a GREAT EVENING/EARLY MORNING and that I get the chance to see you down the road!


Goodnight, all.


G'nite Realwest.

320 Fat Jolly Penguin  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:32:45pm

Holy shit. They're not even pretending to be unbiased anymore.

321 Querent  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:32:55pm

goodnight lizards, and may your claws be ever sharp!

(with options on nasty and pointy)

322 lifeofthemind  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:33:15pm

re: #281 irene NYC

Were you a NY Sun reader then?

A subscriber and occasional letter writer. It is a serious blow. It punched far above its weight across many fields, local politics, the UN and the WoT, the Arts.

323 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:33:38pm

re: #308 Intrepid

From the article:

Democrats are committed to reforming the way Washington does business," Mrs. Pelosi said in a press release at the time.

I'm so impressed with your "most ethical congress in history", Nancy. You're sure doing your part, aren't you?

Folks, this is a step towards a new speaker...get ready for Speaker...hmmmmm

Alcee Hastings? No.
John Murtha? No.

Anyone else want the job?

Anyone?

Anyone at all?

How about that guy over there...they guy from Florida...oh, is that the statute of Will Rogers? Crap, I thought it was John Kerry...

324 Archimedes  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:33:38pm

re: #315 EIDE_Interface

All I have to say about McCain - total and complete incompetence if he doesn't get this "moderator" pulled.

What is strange is the selection. Who are these people?

325 Oldasdirt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:33:43pm

re: #311 Oldasdirt
Now will she please step down,,and who takes her place if she is forced out.

326 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:34:09pm

re: #217 Sydney Carton

I'd address the remark directly to Ifill -- just to set her back on her heels, spluttering, "But I'm not biased! There's no conflict of interest! Uh-uh-uh..." Because then she'd have to admit that, yes, she wrote the Essence article, and yes, she's writing the book for Inauguration Day release -- and in the face of that prima facie evidence, she'd be incapable of appearing unbiased.

327 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:35:13pm

re: #325 Oldasdirt

Now will she please step down,,and who takes her place if she is forced out.

While this might sound too rational---who would want the job? Almost would have to be someone totally new...a yellow dog type?

328 Athos  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:35:17pm

re: #301 lifeofthemind

PBS is just a government sponsored and funded independent agency. There are not the same restrictions to the employees of PBS as would be in effect for, say, an elected official.

Jim Lehrer, the moderator of the Presidential debate held last week, is also a PBS employee.

Apparently there is still the misconception that PBS is a fair, balanced, and impartial organization providing news and information to the American people via a non-commercial broadcasting network.

I would think that ethically, Ms. Ifill should recuse herself from the position of moderator - but then, I'm somewhat deluded in thinking that members of the 4th estate (aka 5th column) should act on an ethical basis. If she doesn't disclose her obvious conflict of interest, then Palin should do it for her in the opening statement as others have suggested.

What's the downside? Pissing off someone who is going to give you a break anyhow?

329 Killian Bundy  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:35:21pm

Anyway, COD4 multiplayer has multiple series of challenges including "Elite" which is pretty much do the impossible.

/just tallied "Collateral Damage" which is "Kill 2 or more enemy with a single sniper rifle bullet", I would like to thank the Barrett .50

330 Athos  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:36:04pm

re: #328 Athos

PIMF - Pissing off someone who is not going to give you a break anyhow?

331 A Balrog of Morgoth  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:36:07pm

re: #219 Opilio

a la Kevin Kline towards the end of Dave

Oh lord. That movie has been on my mind lately from time to time. Something about that "everybody gets a job" liberal Hollywood claptrap...comes to mind every time Obama or one of his sycophants spouts off.

332 SummerSong  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:36:30pm

I am glad Michelle Malkin included contact info. They will be hearing from me in the morning.

Thank you, Charles.

333 Athos  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:36:40pm

re: #329 Killian Bundy

Congrats - that's a tough one that I'm still working on.

334 Ackomanyuki  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:36:57pm

re: #266 Celtic Templar

Always be prepared. My alt location is stocked, in the mountains ... will probably go there on 11/3. If anyone is near a metro Dem area, not to be paranoid, but get a few things together, just in case. Make sure you can get to a safe haven.

This feels like a balls to the wall insurgency by the left. I wouldn't be surprised if there were riots and looting in the metro blue cities.


I'll be driving people to the polls on the fifth.

But, the F250 is gassed up, mags are loaded, and I can rent a Cessna 310 on two hours notice and fly the family down to the Farm and be back for the fun in less than three hours.

335 clgood  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:37:22pm

I blogged my suggestion for the debate commissioner. And yes, I really did send her that email.

336 EIDE_Interface  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:37:23pm

Bill Maher to replace this Obamabot.. At least it'll be entertaining when Maher tells Palin - "you are a rube nutjob". Then Palin proceeds to gut and skin Maher live in front of 40 million people.

337 Intrepid  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:38:02pm

re: #308 Intrepid

Oops, that should have been in quotes, and not a link.

/tired..,

338 solomonpanting  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:38:44pm

In the height of hypocrisy, Ifill will ask Palin her opinion of The Fairness Doctrine.

339 brainwizard73  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:39:05pm

re: #336 EIDE_Interface

I would buy the DVD.

340 Killian Bundy  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:39:57pm

re: #333 Athos

Congrats - that's a tough one that I'm still working on.

/try Shipment, if you can get a shot off, for the record, I got it on Winter Crash

341 x-wing  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:39:59pm

re: #327 brainwizard73

While this might sound too rational---who would want the job? Almost would have to be someone totally new...a yellow dog type?

A yellow dog? To try to herd in those maniac lefties that chair every commitee?

That person would lose their next election.

/Dashle...anyone?

342 zombie  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:40:09pm

Gwen Ifill: "So, Governor Palin, it seems Senator Biden can distinguish between an Indian accent and a Pakistani accent, expecially when purchasing Dunkin' Donuts; surely this speaks volumes to his foreign policy expertise. Can you, Governor Palin, can you tell the difference between an Indian and a Pakistani accent?"

Sarah Palin: "Well, I, uh...what?"

Gwen Ifill: "Senator Biden has specifically complimented Senator Obama for being noticeably clean. By doing so, he shows his appreciation for the cleanliness of African-Americans. But nowhere in your record, Governor Palin, can I find any mention of your pointing out the cleanliness of Senator Obama or any other African-American. Are we to assume, therefore, that regard us as dirty? Or is it filthy? Which is it, Governor Palin: Do you think blacks are dirty or filthy?"

Sarah Palin: "Well, I, uh...what?"

Gwen Ifill: "Senator Biden has reassured us that his IQ is higher than mine, higher than yours -- higher than just about anybody's, really. And you have never rebutted that. And yet where are the results of your IQ tests? I ask you, Governor Palin: Why are you going to such great lengths to hide your IQ test results?"

Sarah Palin: "Well, I, uh...what?"

Gwen Ifill: "And that concludes our debate for tonight. Thank you."

343 Oldasdirt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:41:09pm

re: #339 brainwizard73

I would buy the DVD.

I would pay you to make me a copy.

344 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:41:25pm

re: #192 nigella

Going to bed now....Been up 24 hours waiting for my grandson to be born.It was worth every minute. Really puts in perspective what is important. What is important to me for my family is that Obama needs to be defeated. Keep up the good fight all of you. God Bless.

as the grandma rabbit of five, I can concur. You cannot believe that each little blessing that arrives could amaze and delight you as did holding the first tiny bundle, but somehow they all evoke just as much wonder =)

345 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:41:29pm

Folks, the leftist MSM is openly giving democracy the finger. They are also doing the same to us. They want obama to be president and will do anything they can to help see that happen.
They do not care about right or wrong-just getting back into power. They may just succeed too.

346 Athos  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:41:55pm

re: #342 zombie

Did you steal Tina Fey's working script for the next SNL?

347 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:42:07pm

Since everyone is posting theirs:

Attn: Janet H. Brown, Executive Director

Dear Ms. Brown:

It’s now widely known that Gwen Ifill, the moderator for Thursday night’s Vice Presidential debate between Joe Biden and Sarah Palin, is the author of an Essence magazine ‘special interview,’ “At Home with the Obama Family,” and that she has written a book, “Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama,” due to be released to bookstores on Inauguration Day (Jan. 20, 2009). This is prima facie evidence of a clear bias toward Barack Obama’s candidacy and a financial interest in an Obama victory that directly impacts her ability to maintain fairness and objectivity as a debate moderator.

• Was the Commission on Presidential Debates aware of Ms. Ifill’s past and upcoming publications when it offered her the Vice Presidential debate moderator’s position?

• Who nominated Ms. Ifill for the job?

• How was she evaluated as a candidate for the position? Were her political views taken into account? Was she vetted for conflict of interest?

• Who made the final offer to her?

• In light of her indefensible appearance of conflict of interest and personal political bias, will she be replaced as moderator?

• If she is not replaced as moderator, will you require her to make a full disclosure of her conflicts of interest at the opening of the debate, so that the audience at the venue and viewing or listening at home will have the benefit of that information when evaluating the fairness and even-handedness of Ms. Ifill’s treatment of the two candidates?

Best regards,

[stuiec]

348 pat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:43:14pm

re: #138 Pawn of the Oppressor

Right on.

349 Pythagoras  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:44:20pm

This is the election where the media bias became obvious and undeniable to everyone. The funny thing about that is that it was Hillary who opened everyone's eyes.

The media will pay a dear price for their duplicity. They may get what they paid for but the realignment of news sources will be worth more in the long run.

Four years from now, Obama won't get a free ride from the new media.

At last, the iron curtain will collapse.

350 Hard Right  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:44:22pm

Complian all you want about Ifill, THEY DON'T CARE! they probably laugh at your complaints. They are willing to destroy what little credibility they have left to win.

351 slokat  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:44:32pm

I haven't posted much this last month. Was busy, plus I am at the point that a computer could auto-generate my responses for me.

Nothing that should surprise me, surprises me.
Nothing that should upset me, upsets me.

I'm not fatalistic, just seems that the same script is played each day...

I'm starting to find little justification for the continuance of the MSM, or for that matter most governmental bodies & functions.

352 cliffster  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:45:26pm

To:
Janet H. Brown, Executive Director
Commission on Presidential Debates
RE: Choice of Gwen Ifill as Moderator of the 2008 Vice Presidential Debates

At what point does an establishment like the United States media find the collective sense of honesty to look upon itself and realize that it has strayed far, far away from what could even conceivably be considered a sense of objectivity? The fact that so many individuals working at newspapers, news stations, and other media outlets, have a very thinly veiled, if veiled at all, desire to see liberal minded people take control of our nation, is fairly well documented in the colloquial sense. The fact that those people are more quickly advanced through the ranks than their conservative counterparts, is made clear by the case-in-point of this election season - the undeniable desire of the media at large for Barack Obama to win the Presidential election.

That many in the media at large try to deny this is simply silly. But for someone like Gwen Ifill to be appointed as "moderator" of the upcoming Vice Presidential debates, is an insult to the collective intelligence of the American people. And once again John McCain has taken the high road when he should be lashing out against the clear inequity. Shame on you, Janet Brown, for allowing this to happen. Shame on you, for submitting to the putrification of intellectual discourse in America, caused by you and thousands of other media representatives that are supposed to be closely guarding the gates of objectivity among those who control information in our fine nation.

Clifford Painter

353 lifeofthemind  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:48:42pm

re: #328 Athos

PBS is just a government sponsored and funded independent agency. There are not the same restrictions to the employees of PBS as would be in effect for, say, an elected official.

That puts PBS in the same category as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were in before they bankrupted America. They should be treated with all the deference and respect that status has earned.

354 Irene NYC  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:49:48pm

Wasn't PBS founded by Congress?

355 really grumpy big dog Johnson  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:50:06pm

re: #275 Ojoe

Now that rumor is political kool-aid IMHO.

If he leaves or if he stays the result is the same. Obama made a terrible choice, when it was so easy to make a good one.

356 Canadhimmis  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:51:11pm

I hereby wager two unopened cans of Starkist Tuna and a roll of electrical tape that Gwen Ifill does the honorable thing, stepping down as moderator of the debate due to personal conflict of interest.

357 deanayer  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:52:30pm

If you would like to send a message to PBS about Sarah Palin's qualfications you can take there poll at:

[Link: www.pbs.org...]

after three weeks its an even split.

358 lifeofthemind  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:53:16pm

Goodnight.

359 jcw46  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:54:16pm

re: #351 slokat

I haven't posted much this last month. Was busy, plus I am at the point that a computer could auto-generate my responses for me.

Nothing that should surprise me, surprises me.
Nothing that should upset me, upsets me.

I'm not fatalistic, just seems that the same script is played each day...

I'm starting to find little justification for the continuance of the MSM, or for that matter most governmental bodies & functions.

Yeah, but you'll get over it. :>

(we've all been there. trust me. then one day you wake up and realize that surrendering to the onslaught is EXACTLY what these di

360 deanayer  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:55:32pm

re: #356 Canadhimmis

I hereby wager two unopened cans of Starkist Tuna and a roll of electrical tape that Gwen Ifill does the honorable thing, stepping down as moderator of the debate due to personal conflict of interest.

I actually think she will because this will be THE TOPIC of the news all day tomorrow, guaranteed.

/disclaimer - by "the news" I dont mean nbc,cbs,abc,cnn,nyt,wapo,pbs,npr , time, newsweek, usa today, GMA, the view, pravda, the guardian, etc. etc. etc.

361 jcw46  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:55:36pm

re: #356 Canadhimmis

I hereby wager two unopened cans of Starkist Tuna and a roll of electrical tape that Gwen Ifill does the honorable thing, stepping down as moderator of the debate due to personal conflict of interest.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH.

Phew. Ok now back to a little sanity.

362 Arbalest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:56:29pm

I think that for Gov. Palin to make any announcement about Gwen Ifill's presumed bias, before any bias is shown, is a mistake of titanic proportions that will sink Gov. Plain and the McCain ticket.

I think that a far better plan is to wait until enough bias becomes apparent, and at least 20 minutes of the air time has elapsed (point of no return).

I like the idea of responding to a particularly unfair question (or to a question that follows an obvious slow-pitch to Biden) with the opening:

"Gwen, first let me congratulate you on your new book (speak complete title clearly and slightly slowly). It shows that you are a truly a peer of Jim Lehrer, Bill Moyers, ... . Now to answer the question ..."

At this point, there's no stopping Gov. Palin's answer, and no stopping the debate.

Gwen and the networks will have to be exceedingly fair, balanced and complete in her questions and coverage.

Joe "Super Genius" Biden will then have to spend the rest of the air time taking fast balls and the buffet of lumps they entail.

363 jcw46  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 10:59:49pm

re: #359 jcw46

I just learned something today. You really, really, really can't use a left arrow(alternate comma key) in a post. the rest wasn't much to repeat so I won't.

364 Badge of Kaffir Pride  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:00:43pm

re: #356 Canadhimmis

I hereby wager two unopened cans of Starkist Tuna and a roll of electrical tape that Gwen Ifill does the honorable thing, stepping down as moderator of the debate due to personal conflict of interest.

As a fellow Canadian, I'll take that bet. There's no way that she steps down since the entire MSM is with her.

365 Catttt  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:02:22pm

The Drudge Effect is a truly awesome thing.

Drudge linked to Amazon's list of threads on Ms. Ifill's book page. In the time it took me to read two threads and post one comment, the number went from about 50 to 122.

Drudge is how I found LGF, and I am truly grateful.

366 SpartanWoman  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:03:09pm

re: #332 SummerSong

I am glad Michelle Malkin included contact info. They will be hearing from me in the morning.

Thank you, Charles.


I've already sent my emails. I also read that partisanship might be an infringement of the laws surrounding the PBS funding.

47 USC § 396. Corporation for Public Broadcasting & & & (f) Nonprofit and nonpolitical nature of Corporation & & & (3) The Corporation may not contribute to or otherwise support any political party or candidate for elective public office.

367 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:05:10pm

re: #356 Canadhimmis

I hereby wager two unopened cans of Starkist Tuna and a roll of electrical tape that Gwen Ifill does the honorable thing, stepping down as moderator of the debate due to personal conflict of interest.

Well, I don't know how it is up where you are, but here in the USA, if you tape two unopened cans of tuna together with electrical tape and anyone sees the result, you're in for a nasty visit from Homeland Security.

368 straitcircle  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:07:23pm

So is Obama going to the be the moderator for the third and final debate? It looks like a trend.

369 Wendya  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:08:48pm

re: #59 pat

After watching McCain and his silly smile the last few days , I am reminded over and over again why I hate this unctuous fool. My office has already told me they are sitting the election out. Shamnesty and stupid vacant smiles don't cut it.

Go ahead and refuse to vote. Boy, that'll sure show us, won't it?

Seriously, if you're not mature enough to understand the FACT that this is a two man race and your vote or lack, thereof will influence the decision, it's better that you remain at home with your pacifier firmly in your mouth.

370 stuiec  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:14:56pm

re: #362 Arbalest

I think the direct opposite. Complaining several questions into the debate will likely come across as desperate whining. Opening with a simple acknowledgment that she knows about Ifill's past and future writing about Obama doesn't have to sound like petulance or spite: it's on a par with her convention speech line about how she's not going to Washington to win the favor of media insiders.

As for the debate being unstoppable 20 minutes in, it's unstoppable from the moment Gwen Ifill says, "Good evening, ladies and gentlemen."

371 MoonbatBane  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:16:17pm

This is just a symptom of a larger underlying problem. The marxists took over the government run schools and the MSM decades ago. Over time, they have successfully dumbed down the American population to the point where they don't even have to worry about being exposed on this utter cr@p.

In other words, we're screwed.

372 2SoonOld2LateSmart  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:24:51pm

Just did a quick search on Gwen Ifill, and I see that she was chosen as the moderator of the VP debate back on August 5 2008. The news story did not mention any forthcoming book.

Gwen Ifill of PBS NewsHour to moderate VP debate at WUSTL

373 runrabbitrun  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:25:15pm

re: #365 Catttt

The Drudge Effect is a truly awesome thing.

Drudge linked to Amazon's list of threads on Ms. Ifill's book page. In the time it took me to read two threads and post one comment, the number went from about 50 to 122.

Drudge is how I found LGF, and I am truly grateful.

We're thinking alike tonight :) I came back to check this thread after posting a similar comment hailing Matt on the Overnighter - long live Drudge!

374 funky chicken  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:25:54pm

really, I think the financial conflict of interest would be the thing that should force her to step down

375 NomadOfNorad  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:26:17pm

re: #314 Querent

both of you -- the secret to having a long life is to be willing to get older.

(Deep Thought of the Day™)

I intend to live forever, or die trying. :D

376 funky chicken  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:28:39pm

re: #362 Arbalest

I think that for Gov. Palin to make any announcement about Gwen Ifill's presumed bias, before any bias is shown, is a mistake of titanic proportions that will sink Gov. Plain and the McCain ticket.

I think that a far better plan is to wait until enough bias becomes apparent, and at least 20 minutes of the air time has elapsed (point of no return).

I like the idea of responding to a particularly unfair question (or to a question that follows an obvious slow-pitch to Biden) with the opening:

"Gwen, first let me congratulate you on your new book (speak complete title clearly and slightly slowly). It shows that you are a truly a peer of Jim Lehrer, Bill Moyers, ... . Now to answer the question ..."

At this point, there's no stopping Gov. Palin's answer, and no stopping the debate.

Gwen and the networks will have to be exceedingly fair, balanced and complete in her questions and coverage.

Joe "Super Genius" Biden will then have to spend the rest of the air time taking fast balls and the buffet of lumps they entail.

I agree with you...couldn't do the upding for some reason?

But really, the financial conflict of interest is huge. And Jim Lehrer could step in no problem and do fine, and it wouldn't cause a spat with PBS.

377 jcw46  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:33:44pm

re: #367 stuiec

Well, I don't know how it is up where you are, but here in the USA, if you tape two unopened cans of tuna together with electrical tape and anyone sees the result, you're in for a nasty visit from Homeland Security.

Yeah. Plus they'll blow up your lunch for ya like this.

378 Arbalest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:44:15pm

re: #370 stuiec

You have a point, and in either case, it's a tough play.

I've never seen the "I know this about you, so you have to show that fair" work; I can't do it.

I can see a lot of very bad media spin if this happens, and little upside.

I have seen the oddly-timed "congratulation" work. Gwen asks slightly tougher questions of Palin; well that might just be the breaks. However, a carefully timed "congratulation" might level things.

Media spin will be bad, but this opens up "context"; the McCain campaign simply mentions that when the congratulation was made, the preceding several questions were obviously biased, and this "congratulation" immediately rectified the problem.

The McCain campaign can then ask the question "since the debate questions then became fair and balanced, why is there a problem?"

Yes, I have a preference for this approach, because if it is needed and used, I think it has a chance of success.

I also think that Gov. Palin is the type of person who can easily and comfortably use this.

379 rboa  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:46:00pm

As outrageous as this is, if Palin and the repubs cannot fix this then they truly are not the better candidates for the offices.

380 Arbalest  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:48:05pm

re: #376 funky chicken

Don't sweat it. Thanks.

Stuiec has a point that is not easily resolved. Hopefully, someone in the McCain staff is getting all these points, for analysis and consideration.

381 astronmr20  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:54:59pm

Late to this thread, so this may have already been covered.

Supposedly the McCain campaign signed off on this.


If that's true, then we are most certainly giving a victory over to the jaws of defeat. I might have to go back to thinking McCain has no interest in the presidency of the United States.

382 Salem  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:55:08pm

Yeah, I agree that the Repubs should just pull out of the debate and make sure that everyone knows what the deal is. This is just beyond the pale. The only people who would find the cancellation unreasonable under these circumstances are the hanging chad crowd and aren't about to vote for McCain, anyway. There will be pressure from talk radio for a proper debate that both candidates can accept.

If the media pulls this off, they'll pay for it, later. Somehow, they've managed to delude themselves into believing this is going to work for them, and in the end it's not. The public will tune them out once and for all if they are left with no other choice.

383 astronmr20  Tue, Sep 30, 2008 11:58:19pm

re: #349 Pythagoras

This is the election where the media bias became obvious and undeniable to everyone. The funny thing about that is that it was Hillary who opened everyone's eyes.

The media will pay a dear price for their duplicity. They may get what they paid for but the realignment of news sources will be worth more in the long run.

Four years from now, Obama won't get a free ride from the new media.

At last, the iron curtain will collapse.

Yes he will.

384 Adrenalyn  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 12:17:11am

re: #379 rboa

As outrageous as this is, if Palin and the repubs cannot fix this then they truly are not the better candidates for the offices.

I don't know if I'd put it exactly that way

I might simply say

they are not leaders....
they are Bush-istas
pussies willing to get pushed around and their lunch money stolen

385 Salem  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 12:35:45am

If she decides not to cancel, Palin should start talking about this to crowds at the crack of dawn and promise those crowds that she will bring it up at the debate the first thing she says. Get the storm-clouds gathering nicely by the time the farcical debate begins. Maybe the stupid committee will choke and replace her at the last second. Though I suppose any replacement they selected wouldn't be much better.

386 golly_wog  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 1:22:20am

I would love for Sarah Palin to walk out in an orange pantsuit and a short blonde wig. The left is humorless and can't take ridicule -- heads would audibly explode.

For biased questions she should say, "Can you ask that another way so that the premise isn't incorrect?"

387 golly_wog  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 1:33:45am

re: #110 Racer X

Oh, and for you doom and gloomers who think Obama will have sleepovers in the white house sometime in 2009 - suck on this.

AOL poll:
McCain - 61%
Obama - 39%

Total straw poll votes - 355,659.

I saw this and felt really good about it. AOL is horribly infested with Moonbattus semiamericani, and last election I never saw ANY poll on AOL that had a solid red USA. Boy, that looks good. For AOL it's amazing.

388 Dar ul Harb  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 2:45:36am

re: #267 Archimedes

Okay, where am I going with this thought? I don't know, just wondering what the demographic of AOL is. When AOLers first came on line they were made fun of, which was silly.

Good point. They may have an older demographic (but, if so, they're about guaranteed to vote). The only AOL'er I know is in his late 60's and forwards me emails all the time that indicate he's for McCain-Palin.

(That, and every other chain email he gets. But I don't really mind.)

389 Dar ul Harb  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 2:49:49am

I just thought of a line.

"Ms. Ifill, despite your having written a book praising Senator Obama, I know you'll treat me better than the North Vietnamese treated John McCain."

390 Jeff S.  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:09:54am

Well, it's 6 AM here, and the woman on the sports radio station that I have on just mentioned Gwen Ifill's book deal in her news tidbits roundup. This has gone mainstream. I predict that Ifill will step down - not out of any sense of professionalism - but as damage control, fearing that the blowback from the book brouhaha would hurt O's chances.

391 Dar ul Harb  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:10:20am

re: #385 Salem

If she decides not to cancel, Palin should start talking about this to crowds at the crack of dawn and promise those crowds that she will bring it up at the debate the first thing she says. Get the storm-clouds gathering nicely by the time the farcical debate begins. Maybe the stupid committee will choke and replace her at the last second. Though I suppose any replacement they selected wouldn't be much better.

I agree with your approach. If Palin takes it outside of the immediate debate context, and stresses the obvious conflict of interest, that'd be even better, because it gives the Commission on Presidential Debates an out to save face (whether or not they deserve it). At the very least, it puts Ifill on the defensive, if there's still a journalist with integrity around to report Palin's comments.

(Speaking of which, I'll betcha Rush Limbaugh will be all over this story today.)

392 Dar ul Harb  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:11:48am

re: #390 Jeff S.

Well, it's 6 AM here, and the woman on the sports radio station that I have on just mentioned Gwen Ifill's book deal in her news tidbits roundup. This has gone mainstream. I predict that Ifill will step down - not out of any sense of professionalism - but as damage control, fearing that the blowback from the book brouhaha would hurt O's chances.

Well, that's pretty cool. Was it a local announcer or a network announcer?

393 Dar ul Harb  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:14:25am

re: #390 Jeff S.

The interesting aspect of this is that, if Ifill does step aside (on her broken ankle, ouch!), it's could provide a "teachable moment" about media bias generally, one I hope McCain-Palin can exploit (while praising Ifill for doing the right thing).

394 Jeff S.  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:27:54am

I seemed to recall the AOL poll skewing heavily for President Bush in 2004, so I did some googling, and sure enough came up with this. I'm as skeptical of MSM polling data as anyone here, and fear an Obama victory as much as anyone anywhere, but I'm afraid the AOL poll just isn't realistic.

395 Jeff S.  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:34:58am

#392 Dar

It was on WFAN, a local all-sports station here in New York, owned by CBS Radio. It's technically a local station, but it has a large geographic range in which the signal is picked up, and a huge listening audience.

396 Dar ul Harb  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:42:27am

re: #394 Jeff S.

I'm afraid the AOL poll just isn't realistic.

But the question is, why is the AOL poll, unlike other online polls, not spammed heavily by the forces of O?

And if as you note, it was heavily favoring Bush in 2004, doesn't that mean it could be a fair indicator of the ultimate outcome, even if not accurate about the margin?

397 Jeff S.  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:46:30am

re: #393 Dar ul Harb

Agreed, at this point I think this is a win-win situation. It's amazing that even at this stage of the game, the MSM (PBS included) still don't "get" the power of the internet to out their agenda when it becomes as embarrassingly blatant as this Ifill affair is. They would have been much better served by just having one of their usual lackeys (Lehrer, Brokaw, et al.) do the dirty work. The leftist bias would still obtain, but with the MSM veneer of credibility. I can only guess that they overplayed their hand by assuming Ifill's race would render her untouchable.

398 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:50:59am

re: #392 Dar ul Harb

Huh. JMV didn't show up for this thread. Sureffingprise.

399 Jeff S.  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:52:47am

re: #396 Dar ul Harb

I can only surmise that these results reflect the AOL member demographics. And yes, even though Bush did ultimately prevail in '04, the race was tight, and the MSM pollsters were much closer to the final tally than the wildly Bush-skewed AOL poll. But hey, I'm with you, let's hope history repeats.

400 DoubleU  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 4:10:01am

S.N.A.F.U.

Would you expect anything else?

401 reine.de.tout  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 4:15:22am

re: #398 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Huh. JMV didn't show up for this thread. Sureffingprise.

Heh! Just woke up and am seeing what I missed - and I was just wondering where JMV was!

402 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 4:25:59am
403 JSK1121  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 4:48:47am

re: #114 Sydney Carton

No, that's not good enough. It's asking her if she's fair. Of course Ifill will answer that she's fair, because to her, liberals are always fair.

Palin should flat out call her biased from the beginning. Palin should just call her out, call out the entire charade. And she can link it to the MSM in general trying to destroy her. Tie it to the arrogance of Charles Gibson, Katie Couric, and others.

Is this really Sydney Carton, or is this Charles Darnay? I always got those two confused...

404 WinterCat  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 4:49:12am

Did the McCain camp agree to this? When was Ifill given the job? This is really incredible. Why not have Rush moderate with her? That would be something to watch.

405 Spirit93  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 4:51:41am

The McCain campaign should simply pull out of the debate. I do not think the price paid for withdrawing from the debate will be high, in fact it might be a positive, calling out the media's bias loudly and publicly. Yes, I know they've already done that but unfortunately most people do not pay that much attention to news / politics. Pulling out would raise the issue of the media's bias to a whole new level.

406 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 4:56:59am

re: #402 taxfreekiller

TFK, yours is always an interesting post to read.

That one has to be my favorite.

407 ratso  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:00:49am

this is very simple, look at all the moderators. they are all in the bag and nobama's camp would not debate with anyother type.

408 Spirit93  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:12:16am

I'm starting to think running against the media could be a winning strategy. Imagine a never ending barrage of statements from the McCain camp pointing out all the things the media refuses to cover about Obama and saying loudly and clearly what we already know to be the truth - that they are running against both the Obama campaign and the media. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think there is much love for the media out there and that attacking the media would help the McCain campaign and maybe force the media to start examining Obama.

409 _RememberTonyC  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:22:18am

I think the first words out of Mrs Palin's mouth in her opening statement should be "I hope the American public realizes that tonight's moderator is the author of a book that is extremely favorable to Senator McCain's opponent Senator Obama and that it will be released on Inauguration Day 2009." And then she should make the rest of her opening statement.

410 trailortrash  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:36:31am

this is total bullshit, we are being force fed Obama as our next president whether we like it or not....

411 DaddyG  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:41:29am

re: #326 stuiec

I'd address the remark directly to Ifill -- just to set her back on her heels, spluttering, "But I'm not biased! There's no conflict of interest! Uh-uh-uh..." Because then she'd have to admit that, yes, she wrote the Essence article, and yes, she's writing the book for Inauguration Day release -- and in the face of that prima facie evidence, she'd be incapable of appearing unbiased.

Unfortunately many of the viewing public would think prima facie involves a bucket of killz paint and the top side of their porch.

412 RoboBob  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:45:55am

I would not be surprised to hear that Apostle Gwen has already e-mailed her Lord and Saviour, Obamessiah, with the debate questions she will ask.

Like many of you, I am frustrated/concerned that McCain/Palin seem so disinclined to rip into their opponents, but I am just hoping this is part of their strategy to keep their powder dry until late October and unload with a massive October Surprise. After all, The Chosen One has a very large closet chock full of skeletons.

But the fact that during the first debate McCain did not attack with all the Fannie/Freddie outrages and CRA abuses by Obamessiah does not bode well for the October Surprise strategy..... unfortunately....

413 hooligan  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:46:20am

I just sent this e-mail to the e-mail address provided by a Lizard above:

"My husband and I were distressed to learn that Gwen Ifill has a financial interest in the success of one of the tickets, i.e., the outcome of the election, and was still chosen to moderate the debate of the VP candidates. She should recuse herself or you should replace her immediately. I'm sure Ms. Ifill is thoroughly professional but it would be difficult to not show any bias under the circumstances.

As it is, the circumstances remove any appearance of an "arms-length" moderation happening with Ms. Ifill as moderator. The debate has been tainted before it even begins unless another moderator is found. The American voters deserve your best; please do not let us down."

Of course, it will go in the great garbage hole at the debate commission headquarters. But I just did the right thing in the eyes of God--I showed a devotion to truth. Since I will be praying like a maniac for Sarah Palin today and tomorrow I thought I should do what small thing I could.

Now, Matt Drudge-----his headline is a pretty BIG thing. :)

414 arethusa  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:47:19am

Ifill has normally impressed me as a fair woman, albeit left, but I'm disappointed in this. I don't think it's enough to argue, as her defenders in the MSM are, that she's moderating the V-P debate, not an Obama debate.

415 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 5:47:56am

(Just in, haven't skimmed the thread)

I just send an e-mail to Janet Brown at the debate commission. Kept it very moderate.

In wrap-up, said Ms. Brown and the Commission are facing an issue of character over whether (or not) they require Ifill to disclose the conflict of interest re the book on the air before the debate begins.

Also said, after citing other conflicts of interest on Ifill's part: "In spite of all this, I have no problem with Ms. Ifill moderating the debate."

IF Ifill (or a Commission spokesperson, which I also suggested) makes full disclosure, then Ifill will be looking down a cannon's barrel. If she doesn't behave herself, her shit coming off the fan will hit Obama.

/and I'm banking on her NOT being able to control herself

416 arethusa  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:00:35am

I sent an email, too (see #335 above for a link to contact info). I encourage everyone to do so, and to tell everyone you know, whatever their leanings.

417 HDrepub  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:21:48am

re: #407 ratso

this is very simple, look at all the moderators. they are all in the bag and nobama's camp would not debate with anyother type.

The same could be said for the interviews with Palin. So far both Gibson's and Couric's have been pop quizzes at times instead of interviews.

418 HDrepub  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:22:30am

re: #416 arethusa

I sent an email, too (see #335 above for a link to contact info). I encourage everyone to do so, and to tell everyone you know, whatever their leanings.

I sent mine just before I came on LGF.

419 FrogMarch  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:23:06am

Good morning lizards.

I tired calling the number. it was busy.

420 Taqiyyotomist  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:23:45am

When Obama wins, look for the $$ trail from Soros to McCain.

I don't think McCain wants to win, don't think he ever wanted to win.

Whether it's a bribe, or blackmail, or threats from goons, McCain is taking a dive. I've suspected this from the get-go, when he was amazingly selected in the primaries.

I also suspect that Luap Nor was a Dem plant, as were all his techy supporters, who argued just like Dems. And I had that hunch about a couple of other "R" candidates during the primaries. This whole damn election is a fix.

Senator McCain, prove me wrong. You have a microphone, and cameras, and TV time. Tell the world about Alinskyism, or about Obama's connections to the world's most America-hating groups, about ANYTHING at all that matters. Prove that I am just frustrated and paranoid.

I'm not holding my breath, Senator, for you have done nothing in the past 10 years that did NOT help the Democrats. Why would you alter that M.O. now?

-Taq

(Was there a connection between Soros and McCain during the primaries? Enquiring minds...)

421 SecondComing  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:24:08am

re: #52 rednaxela

I guess that might not be the best play politically, but I think she should then ask Gwen about the title of her new book.

That would be a great moment.

422 headlesschickens  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:24:15am

The GOP is so clueless and spineless right now I could not imagine even a whimper if Ifill had a copy of the book propped up on her desk as she moderated the debate and hawked it during commercial breaks. Thank God/science for blogs for the GOP couldn't find their arses if their lives dependended on it. Oh, wait, their lives do depend on it. Sheeesh.

423 Ron Shaw  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:24:51am

We've all heard of a 'free ride' for college costs. Well, BHO's 'free ride' is facilitated by the MSM who's driving the bus over at least 50% of the voters.
We've lived for decades now under the affirmative action rainbow and the MSM serves their affirmative action java through completely biased inaction.
Set-a-sides are a fact of American life. Now, it seems the Presidency becomes a set-a-side program with the total help of the MSM.
Governmentally mandated subprime mortgage loans to bad risks (thanks to BHO and his fellow dems!) have almost ruined our economy and the MSM is doing their damnedest to catapult the worst example of national and international sub-not-ready-for-prime-time risk into the Oval Office which will ultimately make the 700 billion bailout idea look like the cost of a two-pack of Wal-mart light bulbs, ultimately.
An ACORN for the first time in my life is a negative thing and the MSM says nothing while the flying acornettes spread across America with voter fraud for BHO as their mission.
I have lived through the SDS and Weathermen years as a teenager and adult in utter disgust that some would rather destroy that which makes this country great and kill honest, hard working Americans because they hated this country, its institutions and freedoms and guess what, they still do. Now some of these same treasonous anarchists have monetary and political influenece to the point they can reshape our world with the help of a 'guy from the neighborhood' who's headed for the White House on the MSM bus.
Make no mistake about it this MSM bus is running a light's off, windows-blackened gauntlet straight to the White House and BHO is their one and only 'free ride' passenger.
This election has been rigged by the MSM from the beginning. This may well be their ultimate conspiracy of power to see if they can elect a president. They've been trying as hard as they could over the last decade or more, but this time they've decided to go all in for a BHO win. Evidently, a tank of MSM is far less expensive than a fill-up of Unleaded at the pumps.
This is going to cost us dearly.
How do we fight a totally corrupt MSM?
Disgusted to the degree that it is actually painful!

424 Taqiyyotomist  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:25:00am

The content and comment# of my previous post is purely coincidence, I swear.
-cough-cough-

-Taq

425 HDrepub  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:25:04am

re: #419 FrogMarch

Good morning lizards.

I tired calling the number. it was busy.

Send an email.

426 HDrepub  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:27:40am

re: #423 Ron Shaw

Disgusted to the degree that it is actually painful!


I share your pain, but my pain is turning into anger.

427 Dr. Shalit  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:28:13am

re: #101 rawmuse

The modern debate moderator technique goes something like this

a) first posit a lie as the truth
b) compel the candidate to then accept and explain the lie

"raw" -

Correct - AND -

The Modern Debater Technique in such circumstances should be:

1.) Totally Reject the Premise of the Question
2.) Re-Frame the Question and Answer it in a way favorable to the Debater

By the way, let us celebrate today, October 1, 2008 as the beginning of a sane energy policy. As of today - offshore exploration/drilling is no longer banned.

-S-

428 Taqiyyotomist  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:28:44am

I really do think that McCain is in on all this. Call me paranoid, but prove me wrong. Please prove me wrong.

429 FrogMarch  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:29:10am

Palin will get the abortion, religion and moose questions.
Biden will get the easy soft balls.

We already know that going in.

430 FrogMarch  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:31:50am

re: #425 HDrepub

Send an email.

done.

431 Spirit93  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:32:03am

I emailed the McCain campaign, not the debate commission.

They should pull out.

432 FrogMarch  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:32:56am

re: #428 Taqiyyotomist

I really do think that McCain is in on all this. Call me paranoid, but prove me wrong. Please prove me wrong.

The media are pimping Obama and McCain is in on it?

433 Taqiyyotomist  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:34:02am

#429 FrogMarch

I think Palin will get the technical questions, on the economy, on military strategy, and on (to her and most of America) obscure geopolitics. Ifil is going to make her look stupid, is going to try to keep her off balance.

Abortion, religion and moose questions are questions she would be comfortable with, so those questions are right out. Ifil is going to ask Gov. Palin questions that should be on a PhD dissertation.
-Taq

434 Just sayin...  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:39:05am

Let's just drop the pretext and let David Plouffe conduct the debate:

Mrs. Palin: Why are you such a gun-hugging, religious nut?
Mr. Biden: How many children do you have?

435 Red Lion  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:40:06am

As you know, I am an Obaman, and I completely agree, Ifill should be replaced as moderator.

436 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:41:10am
437 dwill890  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:41:32am

I would go if I were Governor Palin, and after Ms. Ifill asked me the first question I would start to reply then say "oh Enough about me Gwen, Let's here more about you, and that book you wrote on Barack Obama and other Democrats." I would insist she tell us all about it , and I would ask her for a signed copy right then and there. I would ask who wrote the forward; mmmm could it be THE DEAR LEADER himself?

438 Taqiyyotomist  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:42:28am

FrogMarch,

Yup, that's my hunch. McCain seems to be playing the same game as the MSM, that is, not ever mentioning FannieMae/FreddyMac, nor Rezko, nor the cornucopia of communists that Obama spent his whole life with (Frank Marshall Davis, Ayers, Dorhn, et al).

Has Sen. McCain ever mentioned anything at all that matters, that could sway this thing?

Then again, crying COMMUNISM probably wouldn't help anymore, as perhaps 75% of Americans have no idea that Communism is even a bad thing. The percentage is probably greater than that. People don't know Communism is bad anymore, for some strange reason. Oh, yeah, because the schools and media have long been run by Communists.

But yeah, I think McCain wants to do what McCain has ever wanted to do, that is, help the Democrats and defeat the Republicans. I CAN be proven wrong, but this hunch gets stronger each day.

-Taq

439 Taqiyyotomist  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:44:12am

re: #437 dwill890

Amen.

and,

Obama wrote the forward to Ifil's new book?

GOD.

440 Taqiyyotomist  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 6:51:51am

In other words, I believe Sen. McCain, at our expense, is pretending to run for President.

If he does somehow win, notwithstanding his attempt to lose, he will then attempt to quell the (inevitable, planned) riots, to appease the (inevitable, planned) looting masses, by appointing far-left and perhaps even Obama himself to important cabinet positions.

The media push is on, for riots and division. Look for more AP stories on race that use the N-word. Its what the MSM want, too, as always, shootings, looting, rioting masses. And they don't just want it, they actively push for it. Remember the over-the-top Katrina coverage? It was purposeful, and meant to incite.

But I digress. Someone prove me wrong.

441 FrogMarch  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:08:27am

re: #438 Taqiyyotomist

FrogMarch,

Or - it could be the mainstream press is openly pimping Obama - and McCain cannot get a word in edge wise.

442 FrogMarch  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:09:24am

what Palin should say to Ifill if Ifill asks an obvious bullshit biased unprofessional question. (which she will)

"Gwen, that sounds like the kind of question one would ask if one had a financial stake in the election of Barack Obama — like a book about him coming out early next year or something."

443 tappin52  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:15:14am

It is beyond ridiculous, but Sarah Palin will have to play World Wide Trivial Pursuit and Joe Biden will be served tea.

444 joncelli  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:25:37am

re: #110 Racer X

Repeat after me: Internet polls are useless. No offense intended.

445 woodsman  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:31:12am

I wonder at what point Ms. Ifill notified the Debates Commission.
If they found out this morning as most of us did she's toast.
If she told them up front and they still gave her the slot, what does that say about the objectivity of the Commission?

Whether or not she steps down -- which I think she will have too -- Random House is having a champagne brunch over this and Gwen is at the party. Her potential to gain financially from an Obama win is what brings her down.

Thanks for the heads up on this Charles and to Michelle Malkin.
At no other time in the history of the country has citizen journalism been more important to counter the ethics-less behavior of the paid media.
Inform the world Lizards . . . and Thank You!

446 Norm Chumpsky  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:33:32am

Gwen's opening question:
Sen. Biden, you know Sen. Obama very well and have traveled with him extensively. How can he BE so freakin' dreamy?

447 kansas  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:34:38am

The first Affirmative Action presidential campaign.

448 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:34:54am

re Ifill, see my ... #786 pre-Boomer Marine brat ... on the Overnight thread next door.

The DNC should (should) be sweating about her. They need a good performance by Biden, and shouldn't want anything which will distract from it, or sink it.

449 SoCalConservative  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:37:36am

My hope here is that with all (hopefully sufficient) of the attention being paid to the debate and the moderator that Ifil will be under pressure to act professionally.

Of course, I also hope that money will fall out of the sky.

450 Crusty  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:37:39am

re: #24 solomonpanting

TVNewser reports that Ifill has broken her ankle

She tripped over the hugh pile of contemptuous bias she brought for Palin.

She fell because she was leaning too far to the left.

451 Guy_Philly  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:40:58am

I would like to point out that before Michelle Malkin brought this up I did the research on Ifill myself and reported this information here in LGF!

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

(not even a hat tip, but I am sure Charles doesn't read every post)

452 crown_of_feathers  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:43:46am

I think, at this point, that we need to start thinking about limiting the damage that an Obama presidency will do.

It's over, folks.

Too much sh*t coming at the same time.

- A massive, massive media campaign that has systematically undermined Bush in his war against Islamofascists, painted him as "the worst President ever", and made McCain out to be just another Bush.

- A dire economic crisis, due to who-knows-whom, but which the cynical forces of the Left have tagged on Bush and the Republicans. Never mind that the crisis probably came about because of the social engineerings of the Democrats.

- A media so far in the tank for Obama that it will savage anything that savors of Republican comeback (e.g.Palin), but which will never, ever, scrutinize Obama.

- A media-unfriendly candidate (grey, short, and old) who can never compete in the Hollywood-narrative world of Obama.

Let us hope that, 4 years from now (if there is an America left) that there will be a Reagan who will come to undo the damage of Jimmy-Carter 2.

453 notutopia  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:44:59am

Not only is this a personal conflict of interest for Ms. Ifill, based on the book sales dependent success of Sen. Obama to become the next President and enhance her book release which just happens to be on Inauguration day, but on the moral conflict to journalism being unbiased. The other issue at hand to be considered is the actual format being used for the VP debate.
Rapid fire questions from a pool of pre chosen choices by the commentator Ms. Ifill, with 30 second answers required by each debater with a 2 minute session of free floating topics in between. This will be a grueling debate in regards to preparation of all topics in this election, but even more telling will be the ability to communicate under this quick response time period. Try answering a comprehensive, meaningful response to core issues: Health care reform, economic reform, foreign policy, The bailout proposals, in 30 seconds! I expect that Gov. Palin will do well in this format. She will stay on target and give clear decisive replies that are meaningful to the country, her candidacy as the VP, and the vote. Sen.Biden will hedge, smurk and joke and wing many of his answers and gaffe as usual. He would do well not to attempt wasting any of this precious time on condensational overtones or remarks toward Palin, because she may not only put him in his rightful place but she may be his next Assistant Commander in Chief!

454 West Coast Freedom  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:46:25am

Orchestrated Chaos at it's best

455 reloadingisnotahobby  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:51:40am

re: #451 Guy_Philly

I would like to point out that before Michelle Malkin brought this up I did the research on Ifill myself and reported this information here in LGF!

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

(not even a hat tip, but I am sure Charles doesn't read every post)

re: #451 Guy_Philly

456 kansas  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:53:18am

re: #453 notutopia

Not only is this a personal conflict of interest for Ms. Ifill, based on the book sales dependent success of Sen. Obama to become the next President and enhance her book release which just happens to be on Inauguration day, but on the moral conflict to journalism being unbiased. The other issue at hand to be considered is the actual format being used for the VP debate.
Rapid fire questions from a pool of pre chosen choices by the commentator Ms. Ifill, with 30 second answers required by each debater with a 2 minute session of free floating topics in between. This will be a grueling debate in regards to preparation of all topics in this election, but even more telling will be the ability to communicate under this quick response time period. Try answering a comprehensive, meaningful response to core issues: Health care reform, economic reform, foreign policy, The bailout proposals, in 30 seconds! I expect that Gov. Palin will do well in this format. She will stay on target and give clear decisive replies that are meaningful to the country, her candidacy as the VP, and the vote. Sen.Biden will hedge, smurk and joke and wing many of his answers and gaffe as usual. He would do well not to attempt wasting any of this precious time on condensational overtones or remarks toward Palin, because she may not only put him in his rightful place but she may be his next Assistant Commander in Chief!

She will lose, because that's just Joe being Joe, don't ya know. Obama, Change, Hope/Whatever I'm depressed.

457 Dave the.....  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 7:56:36am
I think, at this point, that we need to start thinking about limiting the damage that an Obama presidency will do.

You can do a lot of damage in 2-4 years...remember, Obama is the most liberal senator we have, and San Fran Nan Pelosi and the Dems run congress.
Simple example that everyone can understand.

No new drilling. No nuclear power plants. The Fed'l gov't takes over more "pristine" land to create more national forest/parks/preserves, etc/ Therefore permanently removing them from tax rolls and from any future use such as mining, drilling, logging, etc.

458 woodsman  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:00:39am

re: #451 Guy_Philly

...I did the research on Ifill myself and reported this information here in LGF!
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

You were on it! Is a belated Hat Tip okay!
Next time you get a potatoe (or is that potato) that hot toss it around a little more!
-Thanks

459 Dave the.....  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:03:43am
Not only is this a personal conflict of interest for Ms. Ifill, based on the book sales dependent success of Sen. Obama to become the next President and enhance her book release which just happens to be on Inauguration day, but on the moral conflict to journalism being unbiased.

And it's just your perspecive. A liberal and a conservative view the world differently, therefore ask different questions and press specific issues more.

460 jackfetch  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:08:27am

*****EVIL IDEA******

Gov. Palin needs to take a copy of Ifill's book to the debate... give it a plug on National TV as a "thanks" for moderating. Make sure to describe it as a loving tribute to Obama's image as a tranformational candidate... etc.

461 jester6  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:08:49am

Reading this just adds to my depression too. It has gotten to the point that the MSM and the rest don't even have to pretend they are balanced anymore. And debates on national issues and social policy start with the premise that collectivism is good.

The debate on the bailout bill centered around how much protection to give defaulting homeowners. No one bothered to ask the question IF the government should help people who have defaulted on loans for hard assets. What's next, help to keep people in their cars or help to keep factory owners using the machines they have failed to pay for?

My 9 year old told me the other day that he wishes he could move to a "better country". I asked him to name a "better country" and he told me he did not know but he knows this one is not very good. He also knows Obama is gonna save us all.

40% of the population does not pay a dime in federal income taxes. To them, asking for more from the government comes at no cost. There are like fat people at a free buffet. But they are not serving chicken... they are serving the 60% who do pay the taxes. Between the bailout bill and new government programs - no matter who gets elected - we are fast approaching the point where over 50% of the population will be able to ask for more handouts without cost.

The ideal of self reliance - the very foundation of the social contract which makes us Americans - will be destroyed for good. I really think it is over at this point.

462 notutopia  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:09:05am

Kansas,
OH Kansas, please don't give up your own empowerment and hope! NOT under these conditions or any condition! Don't get depressed, get assertive! and start calling and emailing all your family, friends, coworkers, congregational members, congressmen, even start discussing the Obama socialist policies he's practiced and is proposing with people in the grocery store check out lines! This is not over until the "Fat Lady Sings" on election day!
"We The People" en massed are very powerful if we do not give up in the midst of the fight. This is what Obama's media campaign is strategically counting on, to wear us down and obliterate the air waves and net with their mantras and songs and HYPE! Stay the course and get busy!

463 Dave the.....  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:22:19am
And debates on national issues and social policy start with the premise that collectivism is good.

Which why this lady is the wrong choice to moderate the debate.

The question won't be "what are you going to do to make our nation better", instead, it will be something like "How are you going to increase gov't to give away more free stuff".

464 crown_of_feathers  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:22:50am

re: #460 jackfetch

"*****EVIL IDEA******
Gov. Palin needs to take a copy of Ifill's book to the debate"

At the very least, when Palin is first called-upon, she should begin by saying:

"Before I begin, may I be allowed to ask a question? Ms. Ifill, did you, or did you not, write a book filled with effusive praises of Barack Obama? By what right do you claim to act as an objective moderator? Does the mainstream media have no shame left whatsoever?"

465 spudly  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:38:43am

I've known about the bias of the media for a long time, but this year is so beyond the pale... ugh.

466 Richard Romano  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:44:13am

When I saw this, I wanted to smash my computer - this is so patently absurd...imagine Hugh Hewitt moderating a debate between Obama and Romney? Ifill needs to step aside...and the McCain camp should vociferously reject her as moderator.

The MSM no longer tries to hide their bias -- now they're expressing it openly.

467 rightside  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 8:57:32am

If I were Sarah, the first words out of my mouth during the debate would be something to the effect of: "Gwen, thanks for moderating the debate, when can we get together for you to write a book about me, like you have with Obama?"

468 My 2 Cents  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:06:38am

Surely, PBS could add a co-moderator who wrote a book about McCain? Just check out [Link: books.barnesandnoble.com...] Yeah, Like that would ever happen.

/Dreamoff

469 MJBrutus  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:09:39am

re: #12 Irene NYC

It's gotten to the point that when I look at people I find myself getting angry from the suspicion that they may be an "Obama person." I fear that I am teetering on the edge of ODS, but can't shake the opinion that it is rational to hate what this man will do to this fantastic nation of ours if he's given the chance.

I deplore bigotry in all forms, and am consciously fighting the urge to not look at black people the same way I used to, in that I am unable to suppress the instant conclusion that every one I see is an "Obama person." Maybe I need a way to step back but I viscerally feel the importance of this time in the life of the country that has always been my home and that I love so dearly.

470 So?  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:17:48am

Who picks these moderators anyway? No bias here. This election is a 4 ring circus.

How 'bout Charles being the moderator? His questions would probably be more poignant and we'd get to hear him laugh a lot.

471 ljmw  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:25:33am

I'm sure her "people" are working on that as we speak.

re: #467 rightside

472 BusinessGuy  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:27:58am

I'm late on this one, and did a quick search here to see if anyone had suggested on onslaught at [Link: www.JohnMcCain.com...] and info@johnmccain.com to suggest to them that Gov. Palin handle it with class and right up front.

Here's what I sent:

Gov. Palin needs to address the Gwen Ifill issue first-thing tonight by congratulating her.

She needs to make it classily clear that Ms. Ifill is not an unbiased moderator by simply starting out with the usual 'thank you' that goes along with the first answer, adding congratulations to Gwen on her successful new book profiling Senator Obama. "I want to thank you and the debate commission, and ___ for hosting this debate. I'd also like to congratulate Ms. Ifill on the release of her new book on Senator Obama."

What are we so afraid of? Will it make Gwen hostile? Will Gov. Palin be criticized for an unwarranted attack? She's going to be criticized for anything she does or says there, given the media being so fully and actively in the tank for Sen. Obama. Ms. Ifill is already going to be hostile, and at least this way, her cover of supposed impartiality is fully blown and any "attack" or Biden favoritism will be more likely to be dismissed as bias.

The Republican base will go nuts for it! If you thought they liked the convention speech, watch this bounce! America is tired of the media's relentless push for Obama... the right and middle recognize it for what it is, and the left is irritated it's so obvious!

Gov. Palin is obviously willing to fight for conservative principles (which include such things as full-disclosure and fairness) and the nation needs to see this campaign doing the same.

Let's win this one!

473 141Driver  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:29:32am

First question - Senator Biden, you go first.
"What's it like to spend hours with Barack?"

Second Question - your turn, Governor Palin.
"Why should women stay home and care for their ill-begotten spawn?"

474 Mr. Sandman  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:43:07am

I see you're all panicked that Sarah is going to be humiliated Thursday night, since she doesn't know anything about national or international issues, has never thought about such things in her life. She is clearly an anti-intellectual, and doesn't know anything about anything except Alaska. So you're getting your pre-spin out there (as if anything the moderator does would be at fault if Sarah shows her head to be devoid of knowledge, e.g., if she starts spewing nonsense and jumbled catch-phrases . But good news for you folks: I don't think you have anything to be worried about. The Mccain campaign is going to have her wired. Remember, this is the same campaign that cheated and lied in the Saddleback forum, not being in the "cone of silence" and thus clearly having prior knowledge to at least the first half-hour of questions and Obama's answers to them. Mccain and his campaign have no integrity, they'll lie, use cheap, reckless gimmicks, anything they feel they have to do. Anything, except put "country first."

475 MJBrutus  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 9:45:01am

re: #474 Mr. Sandman

Lookie here Charles. What did the cat drag in this time?

476 Richard Romano  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 10:13:45am

Thanks Mr. Sandman.

Now back to the liquor cabinet, listening to Cynthia Mckinney and Alex Jones, and don't forget about your regular trip to the psychiatrist.

477 Logic  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 10:17:25am

As frightening as this obvious and pervasive media bias is during the campaign, has anyone else here projected how scary this will all play out should Obama become president? We will have a far-left, neo-Socialist in office, coupled with an adoring majority in Congress and a devoted press hell-bent upon ensuring his glorification at every turn.

This scenario sometimes keeps me up at night.

478 Arbalest  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 10:28:45am

re: #474 Mr. Sandman

Weak try, but no.

We see a moderator who is not simply biased, but clearly a partisan for the other side. Her book title, her article, and some of her comments while covering the RNC are essentially proof of her bias/partisanship.

We merely discuss simple tactics that could force the moderator to be fair, assuming the moderator won’t do the intellectually honest thing and step down from the position and let someone else moderate the debate, or at least make the disclosure, during the broadcast, before any questions are asked..

As for gaffes, Joe seemed to have campaigned for Hillary to become the VP selection, and just shortly after Joe himself was selected (a confidence builder?).

Then there’s Joe’s positions on coal-fires electricity plants; he’s apparently both for and against them (at least he manages to cover all possible positions). More?

Obviously, having 3 or so degrees makes one capable of deep intellectual thought, unlike the rest of us mere mortals.

To correct your comments, for accuracy:

… this is the same campaign that cheated and lied in the Saddleback forum, not being in the "cone of silence" having had the host reveal and discuss the first question or two, privately, before the debate and without the other participant present and thus clearly having prior knowledge …

Mccain Obama and his campaign have no integrity, they'll lie, use cheap, reckless gimmicks, anything they feel they have to do. like getting lawyers and public officials to become Brownshirts and threaten media that broadcast unapproved news critical of Obama with legal action”

479 totex-blau  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 10:48:34am

Hey Sandman,

From which one of the 57 states do you hail?

480 Mr. Sandman  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 10:55:20am

re: #478 Arbalest

That article was just a typical puff-article, a day in the life of the Obama family, like many that are written about Mccain and is family. What, she didn't demonize the Obama family in that article? BIAS! Her comments at the RNC were a perfectly legitimate news-description of what occurred during the Palin speech; she described the cheers, etc. And her book is just her analysis of this time in political history; journalists should be free to give their analysis of political trends, etc.

As far as the Saddleback forum, I don't know how you can twist things so obscenely in your mind to justify Mccain not being at the building at the agreed-upon time, so that they could flip the coin and see who goes first, with the other candidate in the cone-of-silence, as was agreed. Pure and simple, he lied and violated the rules. The rules need not apply to him; in his view, he is above the rules. That pastor covered for Mccain, not Obama, by lying and saying Mccain was in the cone of silence when he knew he was not.

And your overblown "brownshirts" hyperbole is ridiculous; all the Obama campaign is doing there is trying to make sure certain Missouri ethics laws are being followed, which they have every right to do.

Finally, the problem with Palin goes beyond "gaffes." Her problem is not superficial but deep. The problem is that she is empty-headed, and clearly does not have the knowledge or aptitude to be anything but a reckless VP choice. Which is why they are going to wire her; they know that's the only way she can survive tomorrow's debate.

481 Greensoccer  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 11:34:36am

re: #40 Irene NYC

Are you sure you have that correct? I distributed it via email and one woman wrote back that the phone number said "invalid number". I sent the email but who knows where it goes.

Pat #39 I agree with you.
I would like to see the GOP act with some testicular fortitude. Enough of acting like a patsy.

482 Arbalest  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 11:43:59am

re: #480 Mr. Sandman

That article was just a typical puff-article, a day in the life of the Obama family, like many that are written about Mccain and is family. What, she didn't demonize the Obama family in that article? BIAS!

She paints the Obamas as a typical American family; okay, how many typical American families manage to get a $2.6million home for $1.6million? Yes, there was a subdivision, and a “loan” (payments?), but the subdivision seems to have been abandoned to Obama (again, payments?). Who else gets such a deal?

How many typical American families have one spouse receive a 190% salary raise? And how many of those have it happen in close proximity to funding arranged by the other spouse? Who else ...?

How many typical American households spend decades sitting in a racist church on Sundays, or working with known and admitted domestic bombers?


Her comments at the RNC were a perfectly legitimate news-description of what occurred during the Palin speech; she described the cheers, etc.

Perhaps you should carefully listen to her words and tone when she makes her comment about Palin’s comments about Obama.

And her book is just her analysis of this time in political history; journalists should be free to give their analysis of political trends, etc.

What is the title of her book, again? Any hype in it? Why?

How do you, in your mind, ignore these facts?

As far as the Saddleback forum, I don't know how you can twist things so obscenely in your mind to justify Mccain not being at the building at the agreed-upon time, so that ... ..., as was agreed. Pure and simple, he lied and violated the rules. The rules need not apply to him; in his view, he is above the rules. That pastor covered for Mccain, not Obama, by lying and saying Mccain was in the cone of silence when he knew he was not.

Try losing your weak attempt at hype. No twist needed on my part. Your twist of the facts is showing.

I note that you ignore the fact that the first question was revealed to Obama and not to McCain. Is the word for this “cheating”? Who admitted that this cheating took place? Obama?

Remember, motorcades are much slower than individual cars; mostly the organizing at the start of movement. Throw in some delay at the preceding engagement, some traffic, and it isn’t difficult to see how McCain could’ve been delayed, and unavoidably so.

But discussing the first question with one participant and not the other; this is easily avoidable. Just don’t do it. Delay the event, and make a call to the other participant. Why didn’t Obama insist upon this action?

And your overblown "brownshirts" hyperbole is ridiculous; all the Obama campaign is doing there is trying to make sure certain Missouri ethics laws are being followed, which they have every right to do.

Hyperbole? Ha. Ha. No.

The Obama campaign is doing what the Brownshirts did. “…which they have every right to do.”? No, and the Governor of Missouri says so on his website.

Finally, the problem with Palin goes beyond "gaffes." Her problem is not superficial but deep. The problem is that she is empty-headed, and clearly does not have the knowledge or aptitude to be anything but a reckless VP choice. Which is why they are going to wire her; they know that's the only way she can survive tomorrow's debate.

a reckless VP choice”: Biden seems to have campaigned for Hillary as VP, to replace him. How many times has he contradicted Obama in the last 2 weeks?

Obama has been a “community organizer” (a highschool-level position), a university teacher, and the Chicago Machine’s candidate. He was handed his election victory. He clearly has no leadership ability.

Palin, OTOH, was elected Mayor, then Governor, and without a party machine like Chicago's.

483 Salem  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 11:57:58am

re: #452 crown_of_feathers

Two words: Bradley Effect

484 MJBrutus  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 11:58:46am

re: #482 Arbalest

Not that this troll needs feeding, but it should also be noted that the Saddleback forum was not a debate. It was a privately-conducted forum that neither candidate was obligated to attend. It's no different in substance than appearing on Oprah, or The View. The host has no constraints on how they choose to conduct their business.

The official national debates, such as the one on Thursday is a public-sponsored debate whose rules are governed by FEC law and as such the moderators, broadcasters, etc have vastly different and binding obligations.

485 Arbalest  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 12:04:46pm

re: #484 MJBrutus

Agreed.

But if Mr. Sandman is going to post his opinions, he should have little problem supporting them. It is a small thing to ask. He seems to have trouble doing so.

486 Salem  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 12:14:24pm

I see a lot of people losing their cool. Not to make things worse, but that isn't going to help things for you any. Whether we are hit with a disaster out of the blue or see it coming miles down the road at us shouldn't make a big difference. We still have to carry on. Ultimately, the left will fail, as they have done throughout the 20th century all around the globe. They work from a flawed premise and build towering architecture upon it. It will not hold. The principles that have always been shown to work will persevere and come back around again, even through an Obomba presidency. As always, whether you can sustain yourselves this difficult time is up to you.

I still think Obomba will probably not win, though. I haven't forgotten the last two elections. Listening to the media will get you down, exactly as it's designed to.

487 iceman1960  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 12:43:27pm

Ask the Commission on Presidential Debates if she will acknowledge her conflict of interest: 202-872-1020.

And here’s the e-mail address of Janet H. Brown, Executive Director of the Debates Commission: jb@debates.org

488 Salem  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 12:47:00pm

And if McCain wins, we still have the problem of a useless fucking Rino in the White House. Obomba would cause another collapse of the Democrats (remember that the Republicans won their first majority in forty years two years after Clinton's election). President McCain, I'm afraid, will just bolster the Dems. Look how they've thrived under a neutered Bush administration..

489 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 1:41:01pm

re: #53 nigella

Stuiec, o. k. if it isn't a conflict of interest, how about unethhical?

Ethics only matter to conservatives. The Left is only concerned about power.

490 Seraphym  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 1:41:44pm

I just emailed the Debate Commission Executive Director, courtesy of Michelle's link in her article (thanks Michelle!).

I was courteous, yet direct. I doubt the director will even pay attention, as allowing such a choice already shows us her allegiance, too.

/either that, or her incompetence
//I smell a 'progressive'

491 Palmetto Patriot  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 1:50:14pm

And the race card is played...

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

Ifill questions why people assume that her book will be favorable toward Obama. "Do you think they made the same assumptions about Lou Cannon (who is white) when he wrote his book about Reagan?" said Ifill, who is black. Asked if there were racial motives at play, she said, "I don't know what it is. I find it curious."

492 grahamski  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 2:21:34pm

re: #119 pat

Fuck off

Well, that was a brilliant comeback...

493 Just sayin...  Wed, Oct 1, 2008 3:49:34pm

re: #491 Palmetto Patriot

And the race card is played...

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

Ifill questions why people assume that her book will be favorable toward Obama. "Do you think they made the same assumptions about Lou Cannon (who is white) when he wrote his book about Reagan?" said Ifill, who is black. Asked if there were racial motives at play, she said, "I don't know what it is. I find it curious."


Well now, how 'bout we have Sean Hannity moderate the next Presidential debate? After all, why would a filthy, traitorous, degenerate, un-American liberal make any assumptions that Sean would be biased in any way? I find it curious that an African-American candidate would balk at this - is he a RACIST?


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

Discover the World's largest E-Book Store! Save big on bestsellers!
More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Lair of the odious neanderthal.


Fast & Free Delivery 160x600
Limited Time Offer:  FREE $10 Online Gift Certificate with $100 Gift Card Purchase!