Overnight Open Thread
Open | Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:40:00 pm PST
Outside of a dog, a man’s best friend is a book. Inside of a dog, it’s too dark to read.
— Groucho Marx
Show top rated links | LinkViewer
Open | Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:40:00 pm PST
Outside of a dog, a man’s best friend is a book. Inside of a dog, it’s too dark to read.
— Groucho Marx
1553 comments
2![]() |
scion9 Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:41:38pm |
So, what percentage of the popular vote did Ron Paul get?
6![]() |
Cognito Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:43:08pm |
Shilling for the Marx Brothers now, I see.
Marx, Charles. Marx.
7![]() |
middlecon Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:44:02pm |
Here's my post mortem on the election:
The polls were actually fairly accurate. I was surprised that Obama won Indiana and North Carolina but it looks like he had enough momentum to win very close races in those usually reliably red states.
The loss of Colorado and Nevada are more troubling, as the demographics in those states are shifting (more hispanics) which will make it harder for Republicans to win in the future.
The hopes of blue states turning red (Penn, NH and even some said Maine) were very wishful thinking.
I'll give Obama a chance and hope he does well as President, I never want to be like the moonbats and openly hate an American President, life is too short.
8![]() |
scion9 Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:44:39pm |
re: #6 Cognito
Shilling for the Marx Brothers now, I see.
Marx, Charles. Marx.
9![]() |
lummox Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:46:39pm |
11![]() |
stuiec Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:48:00pm |
re: #8 scion9
"What was that word you called me?"
"Worm?"
"No, that wasn't it."
"Pipsqueak?"
"No, no, but you're getting closer."
"Ah, I remember! Upstart!"
"Upstart! That was it! Of course you know, THIS MEANS WAR!"
12![]() |
The Other Les Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:48:05pm |
re: #1 lummox
I don't know if I can LAST much longer.
They can't kill you until they get to you.
There's a long list and I'm on it ahead of you. So try to relax.
13![]() |
laxmatt1984 Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:48:28pm |
FYI, Democrats are using the 700 B bailout to funnel money to MSNBC.
[Link: thecablegame.blogspot.com...]
Plenty of coverage at thecablegame.blogspot.com
14![]() |
neocon hippie Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:48:31pm |
re: #7 middlecon
IN and NC may well have been tipped into Obie's column by voter fraud.
15![]() |
logboy Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:49:20pm |
I am completely baffled as to why two states would vote for a man who plans to kill a large portion of their jobs. I've said it before, I'll say it again, if it happens Ohio and Pennsylvania will get what is coming to them. Unfortunately we will all suffer as well. When the cost of electricity doubles I'll finally get off my duff and put up my windmill and build the battery bank. Of course then I'll be required to hook up to my neighbors house and give him half the power I generate. You know, to spread the wealth around.
16![]() |
lummox Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:49:30pm |
17![]() |
The Other Les Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:49:42pm |
re: #14 neocon hippie
IN and NC may well have been tipped into Obie's column by voter fraud.
It's going to be Chicago style elections nationwide from now on.
18![]() |
inquisitive Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:49:55pm |
Why did I have to log back in when I came up thread?...umm is Charles trying to tell me something.....like it's almost 2 a.m. and I should go lay this head on a pillow for awhile?
20![]() |
Killian Bundy Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:50:23pm |
Just a thought but, has anyone asked Obama if he would ever actually use nuclear weapons? He already said he wants to get rid of them (along with a lot of the rest of the military).
/may as well put the nuclear football in storage
22![]() |
Karridine Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:50:44pm |
re: #13 laxmatt1984
FYI, Democrats are using the 700 B bailout to funnel money to MSNBC.
[Link: thecablegame.blogspot.com...]Plenty of coverage at thecablegame.blogspot.com
More and more, revelations like this will reveal to us the depth of the tribulations awaiting us!
Good stuff, laxmatt
23![]() |
The Other Les Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:50:54pm |
re: #15 logboy
I am completely baffled as to why two states would vote for a man who plans to kill a large portion of their jobs. I've said it before, I'll say it again, if it happens Ohio and Pennsylvania will get what is coming to them. Unfortunately we will all suffer as well. When the cost of electricity doubles I'll finally get off my duff and put up my windmill and build the battery bank. Of course then I'll be required to hook up to my neighbors house and give him half the power I generate. You know, to spread the wealth around.
It's probably the urban populations that did it. Miners as rule tend to live in rural areas.
24![]() |
neocon hippie Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:51:45pm |
re: #16 lummox
I don't have any hard evidence but I'm pretty sure ACORN was active in both states.
MO is the only swing state that McCain won. Really depressing.
25![]() |
middlecon Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:51:58pm |
re: #14 neocon hippie
IN and NC may well have been tipped into Obie's column by voter fraud.
Hey no doubt about it, I'm from Indiana and Gary/Lake County is pretty much the hot bed of voter fraud in Indiana, though it never has been proven. Would be interesting I'm sure if some investigative reporters wanted to take a look at the voting rolls.
BUT also I was just reading an article today that Obama did about 10 points better in suburban Indianapolis than Kerry did, and these are NOT hotbeds of fraud, since they are run strictly by Republicans.
26![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:52:30pm |
re: #7 middlecon
And just wait- the demonrats will attempt to pass amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens as one of their first acts in January or February, and McCain will vote with them, knowing Obama will sign the bill.
28![]() |
lummox Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:55:04pm |
Too early for fruitcups, too late for drinkin'. What's a lizard to do?
31![]() |
logboy Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:56:14pm |
re: #23 The Other Les
It's probably the urban populations that did it. Miners as rule tend to live in rural areas.
They are all affected though, and its not just miners. There are thousands of jobs related to coal that will also be lost.
32![]() |
Killian Bundy Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:56:19pm |
re: #28 lummox
Too early for fruitcups, too late for drinkin'. What's a lizard to do?
/too late for drinkin'?
33![]() |
inquisitive Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:57:51pm |
34![]() |
gmsc Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:58:12pm |
35![]() |
Killian Bundy Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:58:46pm |
Pelosi calls for lameduck session to enact stimulus
/nail your wallet to some immovable object
36![]() |
The Other Les Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:59:04pm |
re: #29 lummox
Molt?
There's a low pressure cell over South Dakota that dropping rain on my location so going out for a walk is really not an option at the moment.
37![]() |
middlecon Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:59:11pm |
re: #31 logboy
They are all affected though, and its not just miners. There are thousands of jobs related to coal that will also be lost.
The only thing I can come up with for the Obama "coal policy", is it was pretty clear that he was talking about 'new coal plants'. So I don't think a key part of his adminstration will be to bankrupt the coal industry.
I doubt if he has his way there will be any new coal plants built anywhere, or if they are they will be 'clean coal', but 'clean coal' was supported by McCain too.
38![]() |
lummox Wed, Nov 5, 2008 11:59:32pm |
re: #32 Killian Bundy
/too late for drinkin'?
In my time zone alcohol sales are over. The past two days have put a severe strain on my stockpile.
39![]() |
StudSupreme Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:03:11am |
A good friend of mine believes that Americans have not actually shifted to the left, and that Obama is just a wierd exception to the centrist tendencies of the American public.
I think and hope that he is right. It would mean that if The Messiah actually does start trying to implement his wierd marxist ideas (the ideologically pure $500B internal security force, fully nationalized health care, heavy taxation with select income redistribution, closing down coal plants, etc....) he will lose support precipitously.
MSM malfeasance continues - with the stock market run today, AP says that it's just the market expressing fears of the health of the economy, DESPITE obama's election win........
They'll try to cover for the Dem heavy congressional majority and The Messiah, but if deficits pile up, inflation climbs and unemployment continues growing, they won't be able to cover for their ideological masters.................
In the meantime, if the Repubs don't purge their party of pedo's and scavengers & get back to the small govt with a strong military platform, and then simply drop the social issues that are so divisive, they will not recover and they will not have my support.
Life goes on. Today is better than yesterday.
41![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:04:27am |
At least the threads have slowed down to a readable pace. I am still burnt out over this whole thing. Even up here in Canada I am running across moonbat Obama worship. Two friends on facebook, posters hailing him, and even a store window painted in celebration. One of my friends acquaintances on facebook had the audacity to say that Bobby and Martin are now resting in peace. Almost threw up when I saw that. Don't know what I am going to say when he starts on it this weekend.
42![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:05:58am |
re: #39 StudSupreme
Absolutely no one is embracing Obama for his policies, it was just a 'perfect storm' that put Obama in the White House.
My guess is that without the Dow losing about 4000 points in a month, we're looking at incredibly closer election, if not a McCain win.
43![]() |
The Other Les Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:06:47am |
re: #31 logboy
They are all affected though, and its not just miners. There are thousands of jobs related to coal that will also be lost.
Our socialist run school system has taught their charges to not look at the big picture or see cause and effect sequences. So the disaster that is about to hit them will be a complete mystery that the Donks and their MSM drones will blame on some convenient scapegoat.
Economist Henry Hazlitt had this to say about the phenomena:
"From this aspect, therefore, the whole of economics can be reduced to a single lesson, and that lesson can be reduced to a single sentence.
The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups."
44![]() |
xop1 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:09:27am |
This made me laugh - it's from the blog of Margot Wallstrom, Vice President of the European Commission. Her posting is so devoid of rational thought, so mind-numbingly naive that it almost comes across as retarded. The scary bit is that this is what passes for enlightened thinking amongst European politicians.
"Hurried up to watch early TV-news this morning and cheered together with my youngest son for Barack Obama’s over-whelming victory!
YES – there are huge problems ahead of him and the USA,
YES – expectations may be too high,
YES – he will probably face dangers of all kinds,
YES – he is rather inexperienced and young,
YES – he might be tempted to take protectionist measures,
BUT – he embodies CHANGE!
He has mobilized young people, poor people, the Afro-American population.
He signals a willingness to co-operate – including with the EU on climate change and HE is clearly intelligent, hard working and well organised,
He managed to get people off the couch, to donate money and to engage in the local campaign activities"
[Link: blogs.ec.europa.eu...]
Yes, really.
46![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:10:32am |
What's going on with Ted Stevens in Alaska? Anyone know?
47![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:11:07am |
re: #37 middlecon
"New" coal plants typically also refers to rebuilt plants as well. I mean, coal mines occasionally have to migrate, and with them so too do the firing plants. Especially when renovating and attenuated shipping lines becomes more costly than rebuilding from scratch closer to the mines.
Also, the interview clearly painted a connection between coal burning, and 'ideology', that is anthropogenic global climate change as the decision making factor regarding the coal industry.
The entire Obama energy policy, not just his stance on coal is completely outrageous and self-destructive.
48![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:12:39am |
re: #42 middlecon
Absolutely no one is embracing Obama for his policies, it was just a 'perfect storm' that put Obama in the White House.
My guess is that without the Dow losing about 4000 points in a month, we're looking at incredibly closer election, if not a McCain win.
And it's McCain's FAILURE that he didn't talk about how Obama was tied to the Democrats and groups who caused the financial crisis by denying there was any problem. He didn't talk about he sponsored a bill that called for reform back in 2005.
Nothing.
49![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:13:16am |
Never mind- A Felon Leads in Alaska’s Senate Race
50![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:13:47am |
re: #46 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
What's going on with Ted Stevens in Alaska? Anyone know?
According to this Stevens leads by 3,353 votes.
[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]
Hopefully he will resign if elected.
51![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:13:50am |
re: #39 StudSupreme
The majority of Obama voters have no idea he is hard left. He was sold as a moderate by the MSM, and many people think he will be a post '94 Clinton style president. If he reveals his true self, he will lose support quickly.
53![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:16:18am |
re: #46 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
What's going on with Ted Stevens in Alaska? Anyone know?
US SENATOR
Total
Number of Precincts 438
Precincts Reporting 438 100.0 %
Times Counted 224057/495731 45.2 %
Total Votes 221713
Begich, Mark DEM 103337 46.61%
Bird, Bob AI 8919 4.02%
Gianoutsos, Ted NA 807 0.36%
Haase, Fredrick D. LIB 1516 0.68%
Stevens, Ted REP 106594 48.08%
Write-in Votes 540 0.24%
/still Senator pending his expulsion
54![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:16:46am |
re: #48 TheMatrix31
And it's McCain's FAILURE that he didn't talk about how Obama was tied to the Democrats and groups who caused the financial crisis by denying there was any problem. He didn't talk about he sponsored a bill that called for reform back in 2005.
Nothing.
Oh I agree McCain played it 'nice', but I think everyone knew that coming in, it wasn't a completely lost cause, but after the credit crisis McCain had alot of catching up to do.
56+ million people voted for McCain, thats alot of votes, just not enough.
55![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:16:55am |
re: #48 TheMatrix31
And it's McCain's FAILURE that he didn't talk about how Obama was tied to the Democrats and groups who caused the financial crisis by denying there was any problem. He didn't talk about he sponsored a bill that called for reform back in 2005.
Nothing.
He talked about it ad naseum really. Not eloquently, and not effectively in many areas, using class warfare rhetoric about 'corporate greed', throwing out mixed messages. Talk about it he did though.
He just didn't get any press, or when he did only bad press, calling his accusations 'smears', despite their veracity.
56![]() |
I need a bigger gun Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:17:42am |
Since he now has to go at least the next four years without getting his jollies by nightly bashing a Republican administration, will Chris Matthews rename his show "BlueBalls with Chris Matthews"? Just wonderin'...
57![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:18:55am |
re: #56 I need a bigger gun
It will be very interesting to see who Mathews and Olbermann go after the next 2 years at least, are they really going to pick on the minority Senate and House members? lol....I don't watch their crappy shows but I'm interested to find out.
58![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:19:31am |
I agree. I like Mac as a politician, but the days of old fashioned hand-shake honesty are long gone.
59![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:20:35am |
re: #26 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
And just wait- the demonrats will attempt to pass amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens as one of their first acts in January or February, and McCain will vote with them, knowing Obama will sign the bill.
I used to think so, but now I am not so sure. The temptation is there to add a huge amount of solid Democrat voters, but the downside would be economically catastrophic. The states would fight it tooth and nail, the education and welfare costs would be at least half a billion dollars per year in new expenses, and the taxes paid by the low end blue-collar wages they would earn would only cover a fraction of that cost... maybe 10% or so.
60![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:21:34am |
re: #56 I need a bigger gun
Since he now has to go at least the next four years without getting his jollies by nightly bashing a Republican administration, will Chris Matthews rename his show "BlueBalls with Chris Matthews"? Just wonderin'...
It's like Powell's "Pottery Barn" rule.
/you broke it, now you own it
61![]() |
RTLM Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:21:53am |
re: #20 Killian Bundy
/may as well put the nuclear football in storage
62![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:22:11am |
re: #58 logboy
I agree. I like Mac as a politician, but the days of old fashioned hand-shake honesty are long gone.
/my friends
63![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:22:14am |
re: #50 middlecon
According to this Stevens leads by 3,353 votes.
[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]
Hopefully he will resign if elected.
He's not required to. And until he is sentenced his conviction does not become official, and I believe that's in January. Screw the "doing the right thing" bullshit. The GOP has done that for years and has gotten fucked. The libturds keep "Cold Cash" Jefferson in office. Fight fire with fire. Let Stevens stay until he has to, by law resign. Then let the governor of Alaska (wink, wink) appoint a replacement until an election can be held.
64![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:22:56am |
re: #59 stevieray
I used to think so, but now I am not so sure. The temptation is there to add a huge amount of solid Democrat voters, but the downside would be economically catastrophic. The states would fight it tooth and nail, the education and welfare costs would be at least half a billion dollars per year in new expenses, and the taxes paid by the low end blue-collar wages they would earn would only cover a fraction of that cost... maybe 10% or so.
Complete amnesty would be one way sure way, and there are hundreds, for Dems to blow it once again, it will happen the only question is how will they accomplish it.
Anyway the last I heard from the MSN they said that illegal immigrants can't even make it in the USA anymore, with the bad economy.
65![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:24:35am |
re: #63 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
I don't know the rules in Alaska, but wouldn't the Governor appoint someone for the whole term? Seems like an elected Senator has 6 years, whether they resign or not?
66![]() |
I need a bigger gun Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:24:54am |
The scariest thought coming on the heels of this election:
The top three rungs in the political chain of command are now filled by Obama, Biden, and Pelosi. We...are...screwed...
67![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:25:17am |
re: #64 middlecon
Complete amnesty would be one way sure way, and there are hundreds, for Dems to blow it once again, it will happen the only question is how will they accomplish it.
Anyway the last I heard from the MSN they said that illegal immigrants can't even make it in the USA anymore, with the bad economy.
Lemme find an interesting link for you. BRB
68![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:25:18am |
re: #59 stevieray
I used to think so, but now I am not so sure. The temptation is there to add a huge amount of solid Democrat voters, but the downside would be economically catastrophic. The states would fight it tooth and nail, the education and welfare costs would be at least half a billion dollars per year in new expenses, and the taxes paid by the low end blue-collar wages they would earn would only cover a fraction of that cost... maybe 10% or so.
Unfortunately, the states would have no choice. It's not a constitutional amendment nor issue.
69![]() |
gmsc Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:25:55am |
re: #46 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
What's going on with Ted Stevens in Alaska? Anyone know?
As I understand it, Ted Stevens is expected to win. He will be resigning, and then Sarah Palin will appoint a Republican to replace Stevens.
The voters have understood since at least the Stevens corruption verdict was handed down.
Basically, Begich is losing to a Republican to be named later.
70![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:27:11am |
Ok researching the Stevens thing, if elected they would expel him, which would requie a special election.
But surely a conviction-free Republican would win a special election in Alaska? I'm thinking that seat is pretty safe.
71![]() |
Salem Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:27:12am |
I wonder how much tension Obama will cause with his staffing choices? Not enough black cabinet members, or maybe too many, excluding politicians who expected paybacks. It's going to be a crazy disreputable bunch by any measure, I'm sure.
72![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:28:06am |
re: #65 middlecon
I don't know the rules in Alaska, but wouldn't the Governor appoint someone for the whole term? Seems like an elected Senator has 6 years, whether they resign or not?
I don't know the law in Alaska. I would think it would be until the next election, in 2010. I would doubt the governor could appoint someone for the entire six year term.
73![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:28:58am |
I wonder if Lieberman will caucus with the republicans. He might as well- the democrats hate him after this election.
74![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:29:02am |
Yes Stevens seat is most likely headed for a special election:
[Link: alaskadispatch.com...]
75![]() |
gmsc Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:29:06am |
re: #70 middlecon
Ok researching the Stevens thing, if elected they would expel him, which would requie a special election.
But surely a conviction-free Republican would win a special election in Alaska? I'm thinking that seat is pretty safe.
This is true, but I understand that Stevens will be resigning before there's even a chance for him to be expelled. That way, it falls to the Alaskan governor to appoint his replacement.
76![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:30:01am |
re: #73 Sharmuta
Poor Joe, he's dead to either side at this point lol....I saw some report that his party (The Lieberman Party?) in CT was taken over too.
77![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:30:45am |
re: #70 middlecon
Ok researching the Stevens thing, if elected they would expel him, which would requie a special election.
But surely a conviction-free Republican would win a special election in Alaska? I'm thinking that seat is pretty safe.
Agreed. But it would not be until 2010, that would cost millions of dollars to have an election let's say next year.
78![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:30:54am |
re: #75 gmsc
From the link earlier:
In 2004, the Legislature passed a bill requiring a special election but left open the option for the governor to appoint a temporary replacement until an election could be held. Later in 2004, Alaskans passed a ballot measure that also said there must be a special election but stripped the governor of her authority to appoint a temporary replacement.
So the law has been changed in Alaska recently.
79![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:31:59am |
re: #63 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
He's not required to. And until he is sentenced his conviction does not become official, and I believe that's in January. Screw the "doing the right thing" bullshit. The GOP has done that for years and has gotten fucked. The libturds keep "Cold Cash" Jefferson in office. Fight fire with fire. Let Stevens stay until he has to, by law resign. Then let the governor of Alaska (wink, wink) appoint a replacement until an election can be held.
You're probably going to call me a moron again, but politicians like Stevens are a huge part of the problem with the Republican party.
/we need to be the Party cutting government spending and fiscal responsibility and Stevens is the undisputed champion of elbowing others away from the earmarks trough, somehow, earmarks need to stop, period
80![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:32:08am |
re: #63 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
He's not required to. And until he is sentenced his conviction does not become official, and I believe that's in January. Screw the "doing the right thing" bullshit. The GOP has done that for years and has gotten fucked. The libturds keep "Cold Cash" Jefferson in office. Fight fire with fire. Let Stevens stay until he has to, by law resign. Then let the governor of Alaska (wink, wink) appoint a replacement until an election can be held.
I'm with you on the quit playing it nice. We like to take the high road, and be the better person. Unfortunately it rarely seems to come out in the end and the Dems spin it off as somehow being our fault. When is someone finally going to start nailing people to the wall, kicking ass and taking names?
81![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:34:34am |
re: #77 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
Agreed. But it would not be until 2010, that would cost millions of dollars to have an election let's say next year.
PIMF- It would cost millions of dollars to have an election just to replace Ted Stevens in 2009. They'll wait until 2010, and Sarah Palin will select his replacement once he is sentenced, assuming he wins.
82![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:34:47am |
re: #64 middlecon
Anyway the last I heard from the MSN they said that illegal immigrants can't even make it in the USA anymore, with the bad economy.
There is some self-deportation happening, but it is not entirely a new phenomena, and there are still more coming in than leaving. So for the most part that just isn't true.
What really happened, is a lot of latinos were involved in construction, and since the subprime collapse they can't make it in those industries any more because there just aren't enough jobs. The amount of jobs in construction were abnormally high though because of the bubble. With unemployment still relatively low, there isn't a lot of room for this 'unskilled' labor to go anywhere else, like agriculture.
Those are the illegals that are self-deporting.
83![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:35:06am |
re: #64 middlecon
Here it is. [pdf]
California is predicted to have a drop of 11% in per capita income in the next decade because of the demographic shifts that have already occurred. The house of reps would lose half their membership in 2010 if they passed an amnesty.
Governors have a pretty good amount of sway with their reps in DC. Nobody wants to be stuck in Washington half the year while their governor is dragging their name through the mud back home.
84![]() |
RTLM Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:35:26am |
re: #73 Sharmuta
I wonder if Lieberman will caucus with the republicans. He might as well- the democrats hate him after this election.
He should change his party to "R". Today.
The Dems are in process of stripping he committee chairmanships as we speak.
(Nothing to lose)
85![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:35:34am |
re: #80 logboy
I'm with you on the quit playing it nice. We like to take the high road, and be the better person. Unfortunately it rarely seems to come out in the end and the Dems spin it off as somehow being our fault. When is someone finally going to start nailing people to the wall, kicking ass and taking names?
Palin tried.
86![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:39:02am |
re: #79 Killian Bundy
I agree. Democrat constituencies elect William Jefferson's to office. Republican constituencies, by and large, will not tolerate it. Holding it up as a virtue, or calling it 'not playing nice', would be extremely damaging.
87![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:39:44am |
re: #79 Killian Bundy
You're probably going to call me a moron again, but politicians like Stevens are a huge part of the problem with the Republican party.
/we need to be the Party cutting government spending and fiscal responsibility and Stevens is the undisputed champion of elbowing others away from the earmarks trough, somehow, earmarks need to stop, period
No, I will not call you any name. I see what you mean. He needs to go. But the "we'll play nice if you play nice" does not work with the libs. Everytime we try that, we get burned. We need to fight fire with fire.
Yeah, maybe we can claim the higher ground, but if in the end we get screwed, why bother?
What makes their crooks any better than ours?
88![]() |
Rancher Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:41:14am |
Lieberman is a liberal and votes liberal. What good would it do us to have another RINO?
89![]() |
laZardo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:41:28am |
Good afternoon folks, on a short break from class right now...
90![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:41:59am |
re: #87 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
What makes their crooks any better than ours?
Their ability to get away with it in the eyes of the msm and their constituents.
91![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:42:10am |
Alaska is such a deep red state, that I can't see that senate seat being in jeopardy in a special election.
92![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:43:17am |
re: #85 TheMatrix31
Palin tried.
Yeah, and got thrown under the bus. Wtf is wrong with those people?
In other news, I found my bumper sticker.
93![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:43:36am |
I re-proposed my plan to my parents regarding the move of my family to TX, or at least out of CA.
They seemed a bit more inclined and willing to listen.
I HOPE we make the CHANGE.
94![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:43:38am |
re: #87 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
By the way:
US REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 06 Totals Pct Graph
Independence BOB ANDERSON 40642 10.04
Republican MICHELE BACHMANN 187805 46.41
Democratic-Farmer-Labor EL TINKLENBERG 175784 43.44
Write-In WRITE-IN** 467 0.12
Write-In AUBREY IMMELMAN** 7 0.00
/she lives to make off the wall statements for another two years
95![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:45:13am |
Look guys, my feeling is that the election is over, the talking heads in the MSM will do post mortems to death. Today our nation and allies are imperiled, and a good and decent man, and American hero lost an election to a man who has never gone in harms way to serve our nation when it is peril.
The real victory is that we have identified a new star in the Republican party, and she have a few years to prepare her to take on the challenges that she must. If not for Gov Palin the election would have been a rout and we would possibly be facing a Democratic legislature that could cut off debate whenever they chose to. The nation will have a new President come January, and we as Americans have a responsibility to ensure that he remembers he is our servant and not the other way around.
I am prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt on some issues, but like Ronald Reagan I believe in the principle of trusting but verifying that the trust you put in someone was not misplaced.
We have work to do, alliances to make and an opportunity to repair bridges that we neglected over the years.
Lee Atwater's big tent has been weakened, and we have to return to that idea.
The big spenders have to go, we cannot beat the Democrats by being weak imitations of them.
So let me wish President-elect Obama good fortune and congratulate him on his victory. Fellow Lizards let us stand ready to assist him by doing the hard things that must be done to strengthen our nation and preserve our freedoms if his efforts and policies are directed at making our nation better. As well, we are a part of a healthy democracy, and as such we must be a loyal opposition which also has the responsibility to vigorously resist the government if we believe its policies will weaken the nation or imperil our allies.
Keep fighting the good fight my friends, and Governor Palin, we will not forget you.
96![]() |
laZardo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:45:19am |
re: #94 Killian Bundy
Speaking of which...any chance of Al Franken making the Senate?
97![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:45:33am |
re: #88 Rancher
Lieberman is a liberal and votes liberal. What good would it do us to have another RINO?
While I agree, at this rate any Republicans at all from the northeast are going to be few and very far between. I'm not sure if true 'red meat' conservatives can get elected in the northeast states. Its going to take some "RINOs" in the northeast to get the majorities back in the house and senate, but again Leiberman wouldn't be one of those, he's clearly TOO liberal on everything except Isreal. I also don't want to see the Lincoln Chafee's of the world, but Susan Collins and Olympia Snow types will be necessary to get the majority back.
98![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:45:43am |
re: #88 Rancher
Yes- with a marxist in the oval office, why would we need friends?
99![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:45:54am |
re: #87 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
No, I will not call you any name. I see what you mean. He needs to go. But the "we'll play nice if you play nice" does not work with the libs. Everytime we try that, we get burned. We need to fight fire with fire.
Yeah, maybe we can claim the higher ground, but if in the end we get screwed, why bother?
What makes their crooks any better than ours?
One of the big things that prevents either party from burning the other as bad as they want to is that they are forced to play ball because they are both so stuffed full of crooks that when one of them does go down, they are probably going to drag others with them.
Why don't you think Republicans go after Cold Cash, and Pelosi for their blatantly criminal behavior, even in the media? How can they seriously point any fingers at anybody if they aren't willing to roust the rot from their own party?
100![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:46:52am |
Zombie should get props for this bumper sticker.
101![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:49:02am |
re: #96 laZardo
Speaking of which...any chance of Al Franken making the Senate?
/not without chicanery
102![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:50:24am |
re: #98 Sharmuta
Yes- with a marxist in the oval office, why would we need friends?
If he isn't willing to filibuster with Republicans, or vote along party lines in committees, his party affiliation is essentially irrelevant. If he is willing to do those things, his party affiliation is essentially irrelevant, except for PR purposes.
Lieberman is too much of a national celebrity to really give any image points to Republicans though. Everyone who even follows such minutia in politics would know the PR ploy for what it was.
104![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:51:34am |
re: #90 Sharmuta
their constituents.
Why do we care? Like I said, we have always tried to play nice, reach across the aisle. When the hell have the libs EVER done that? To the libs compromise is us agreeing with them. Fuck that! I'm sick of it.
That's why we end up with John McCain and/or Bob Dole as our candidate. Both heroes, both great Americans, but both too damn willing to compromise our conservative values to "reach out" to the libs.
Fuck that! I don't want to reach out to them, I want to defeat them!
105![]() |
gmsc Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:51:36am |
re: #96 laZardo
Speaking of which...any chance of Al Franken making the Senate?
As of 2 hours ago, it looks like a recount is in the works.
106![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:52:57am |
re: #87 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
No, I will not call you any name. I see what you mean. He needs to go. But the "we'll play nice if you play nice" does not work with the libs. Everytime we try that, we get burned. We need to fight fire with fire.
Yeah, maybe we can claim the higher ground, but if in the end we get screwed, why bother?
What makes their crooks any better than ours?
I agree. I'm a firm believer in what goes around comes around. However, in our case it seems to come around a lot more than it goes around.
107![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:53:20am |
re: #104 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
Sorry- I wouldn't elect a known crook.
108![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:55:42am |
109![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:56:59am |
Look- politics is the art of compromise. What we must do is define our line in the sand. We will compromise to this point and no further. And then we have to stand behind that line, defend that line and actually not compromise that line.
110![]() |
redc1c4 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:57:19am |
re: #28 lummox
Too early for fruitcups, too late for drinkin'. What's a lizard to do?
too late for drinknin?
says who? we don't call this the LNDT for nada.....
/boat drinks all around!
111![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:58:01am |
re: #104 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
Yeah, but Ted Stevens is yet another 'reach across the aisle' kind of Republican. He was at least equally concerned with bringing home the bacon as anything that is actually relevant to his role as a US Senator. A pork barrel Republican Senator isn't demonstrably different than Barack "Spread the Wealth Around" Obama or any other redistrubitionist Democrat. While the ideology might not be identical, in practice they both come off looking like Robin Hoodism.
More importantly, as the electorate that votes for Republicans, or even just against Democrats, why the hell would we want a corrupt Republican pork barreller, when we can just vote Dem instead and get a full blown neomarxist?
At least the latter will admit that he is going to misappropriate public funds to buy votes, and as such we will never have to turn a blind eye to such behavior. If the Republican electorate alters its voting habits to accomodate such behavior why turn a blind eye when instead you can just cheer it on?
112![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:58:01am |
re: #99 scion9
One of the big things that prevents either party from burning the other as bad as they want to is that they are forced to play ball because they are both so stuffed full of crooks that when one of them does go down, they are probably going to drag others with them.
Why don't you think Republicans go after Cold Cash, and Pelosi for their blatantly criminal behavior, even in the media? How can they seriously point any fingers at anybody if they aren't willing to roust the rot from their own party?
If it was a fair fight, I'd agree with you. But it isn't. The media will ignore the criminal behavior from the left because they figure whatever it takes for their side to win is okay.
113![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:58:03am |
Question, should I buy futures in Rolaids, Tums, or Pepto Bismol?
/looks like it's going to be one of those years I guess.
114![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:58:27am |
re: #110 redc1c4
too late for drinknin?
says who? we don't call this the LNDT for nada.....
/boat drinks all around!
Let's just drink some Kool-Aid!
YAY!
116![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:58:37am |
re: #109 Sharmuta
Look- politics is the art of compromise. What we must do is define our line in the sand. We will compromise to this point and no further. And then we have to stand behind that line, defend that line and actually not compromise that line.
And republicans that do compromise that line- boot them in the primaries or caucuses. (That means getting involved in the primary or caucus process, folks.)
117![]() |
gmsc Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:59:10am |
118![]() |
Atweber Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:59:44am |
hello faithful lizards from beautiful and amazing Kyoto. just spent the day in walking amazement of japan's history. there are over 17,000 shrines and temples here!
119![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:00:14am |
re: #104 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
I am willing to compromise on somethings.
I believe that two good people can come to very different conclusions even if they read the same information, because of their different perspectives.
Compromise gives us an opportunity to benefit from some of the strengths that our Democratic adversaries may have that we do not, They are not all bad, although many of them are misinformed.
But compromise means they give up a bit and we give up a bit and we meet somewhere in the middle. Compromise does not mean that we give away the farm to get an ear of corn as compensation.
I say we always listen, I say we cooperate when it benefits the nation, and I propose we stand ready to resist with every bit of our being if our liberty and values are threatened.
120![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:00:23am |
re: #107 Sharmuta
Sorry- I wouldn't elect a known crook.
Explain to me where I said elect a crook...
121![]() |
westbankmama Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:00:49am |
Good morning from Israel.
An Israeli who works in the store next to mine just came in to "see how I was feeling the day after". He also says he knows an American expat who knew Obama in college, and she described him as "gurnisht mit gurnisht" - a Yiddish expression which basically means "nothing from nothing."
I guess "0" (zero) really is appropriate.
122![]() |
gmsc Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:01:22am |
re: #118 Atweber
hello faithful lizards from beautiful and amazing Kyoto. just spent the day in walking amazement of japan's history. there are over 17,000 shrines and temples here!
Ahhh . . . Kyoto! The Anagram Lover's Tokyo!
123![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:02:52am |
re: #120 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
You were talking about why they get away with stuff and we don't. That's because our side holds people accountable for their actions. Republicans would not elect a known crook like dems do.
124![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:03:00am |
Here's something for all you lizards. Sharmuta, you could probably use it too. A little book called "Take Back Your Government" by Robert A. Heinlein. It's out of print now but there should be some copies around somewhere. Browse your used book stores, check your libraries. Some info maybe out of date, but not all of it.
/just doing my part. Posting in book links as well.
125![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:03:22am |
re: #120 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
Explain to me where I said elect a crook...
Okay, you're going back to my #87.
126![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:03:47am |
re: #121 westbankmama
Good morning from Israel..
/come next January 20, sincerely fear for your safety, do you think Israel can stand alone against all comers?
127![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:04:37am |
re: #112 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
If it was a fair fight, I'd agree with you. But it isn't. The media will ignore the criminal behavior from the left because they figure whatever it takes for their side to win is okay.
That is true, but polls show that 4/5ths of Americans mistrust the media. A lot of the GOP campaign angles didn't stick to Obama, but they did stick to the media. 93% of Journalist are self identified as 'liberal', and probably a higher precentage is Democrat.
They openly admit to being biased in editorials, but then say that they are professionals and keep the bias out of it. No one believes it. If the GOP wanted to, and it should, it needs to continue to push that angle and paint themselves as the recievers of undeserved floggings by the media.
The media coverage will continue to be biased. Don't doubt it. Don't let anyone else doubt it either.
128![]() |
redc1c4 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:05:00am |
re: #114 TheMatrix31
Let's just drink some Kool-Aid!
YAY!
/adds everclear to the koolade......
how's that?
129![]() |
Sylvester_T_Cat Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:05:50am |
re: #65 middlecon
I don't know the rules in Alaska, but wouldn't the Governor appoint someone for the whole term? Seems like an elected Senator has 6 years, whether they resign or not?
I think it may have been changed to something like "until the next regular election", after a previous governor appointed his own daughter as U.S. Senator. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) served the remainder of that term and has since been re-elected in her own right.
However long any possible appointee is going to serve, that person will still have the huge advantage of the incumbency when he or she first faces election. Doesn't exactly break my heart that it's going to be a Republican ;-).
Aside from that, there is a question in many Alaskans' minds whether Senator Stevens got a fair trial anyway. That juror who had to be replaced because she went AWOL to see a Horse Breeders' Cup or something in California, for example, wasn't exactly awe-inspiring.
/Official results are available online, but there's a but you may want to know about-- my understanding is that Alaskan absentee ballots will not be counted until Nov. 14. AK absentee ballots are valid if mailed by the date of the election, and the Dept of Elections is apparently waiting to do all 40K-60K (different sources) of them at once.
130![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:06:07am |
131![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:08:18am |
132![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:08:36am |
re: #123 Sharmuta
I'm not saying elect a crook. I'm saying that Senator Stevens was already on the ballot as the sitting Senator from Alaska. Was he convicted? Yes. What does the law say? It says until he is sentenced he is free to run for re-election. So if the people of Alaska re-elect him, he can serve until he is sentenced.
133![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:09:18am |
re: #123 Sharmuta
You were talking about why they get away with stuff and we don't. That's because our side holds people accountable for their actions. Republicans would not elect a known crook like dems do.
Or elect one president.
134![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:10:46am |
re: #126 Killian Bundy
There's an election coming up in Israel, too.
Israel's Labor Party seems to be (fortunately) disintegrating, although they still say crazy things like this:
Paz-Pines's Labor colleague, Education Minister Yuli Tamir, added that "Israel and the world cannot move in different directions. The world is going social-democratic and pursuing peace, so Israel cannot choose capitalism and defensive attitudes rejecting diplomatic dialogue."
I hope the Labor Party keeps disintegrating.
Israel's best hope is the Likud Party with additional hopes that Bibi Netanyahu will do the right things this time if he makes it back into the PM chair.
135![]() |
J-LLatPoH Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:11:27am |
I saw a clip online from Oprah's show yesterday, with her practically falling all over herself for the man she helped elect.
[Link: www.black-and-right.com...]
My wife caught a bit of the nightline report Wednesday evening and saw reports of "jubilation" in Chicago... People crying, praising the new President-Elect.
Has the term "Obamagasm" been reserved in the lexicon yet? I wouldn't be surprised if cigarette sales skyrocketed Thursday.
J
136![]() |
lummox Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:11:47am |
As slow as these threads are getting, shouldn't we be getting our avatars back soon?
137![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:14:25am |
Congress has borderline single digit polling numbers. The only other democratically elected body or politician in the world with that kind of approval rating is Achmedinijad.
The big issue is right now, that if you look at state by state polling, everyone loves their own Congresspeople, and hate everyone elses. Look at Jack Effin Murtha. Look at Teddy Effin Kennedy. National laughing stocks. No risk of losing the incumbency.
I don't have a solution to that. It just seems like a very exploitable area of attack. 70% approval ratings for basically every in their state Congressman from the same sample of people that would give Congress overall 10% seems like a weakness.
138![]() |
westbankmama Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:14:31am |
re: 126 Killian Bundy
Thanks for the concern. I think that the IDF has had emergency plans already made up. In a strange way I think it will be better for us to not be able to rely on another country to help us in our defense.
In any case, we have someone "upstairs" watching our back too!
139![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:15:04am |
re: #136 lummox
As slow as these threads are getting, shouldn't we be getting our avatars back soon?
Obama has taken them to spread the avatar wealth among people who don't have computers.
140![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:16:36am |
re: #136 lummox
As slow as these threads are getting, shouldn't we be getting our avatars back soon?
The president-elect has decreed that avatars 150,000 bytes or bigger need to be redistributed to the avatar-less.
141![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:17:49am |
re: #127 scion9
That is true, but polls show that 4/5ths of Americans mistrust the media. A lot of the GOP campaign angles didn't stick to Obama, but they did stick to the media. 93% of Journalist are self identified as 'liberal', and probably a higher precentage is Democrat.
They openly admit to being biased in editorials, but then say that they are professionals and keep the bias out of it. No one believes it. If the GOP wanted to, and it should, it needs to continue to push that angle and paint themselves as the recievers of undeserved floggings by the media.
The media coverage will continue to be biased. Don't doubt it. Don't let anyone else doubt it either.
And that is my point. We cannot expect to get fair treatment as long as the MSM is 80-90% in the tank for the libs. Of course they'll overlook Obama's radicalism and worry about Gov. Palin's firing a state trooper who used a taser on his 10 year old step-son.
So we have to forget this "let's all get along" bullshit and go for their jugular.
If McCain had been running those commercials with Obama's Rev. Wright saying "God Damn America" and "US of KKK A" commercials for the last three months, he'd be President elect.
I'm sick and tired of us having to be nice, when every time we do it we get f*cked!
142![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:18:12am |
re: #138 westbankmama
re: 126 Killian Bundy
Thanks for the concern. I think that the IDF has had emergency plans already made up. In a strange way I think it will be better for us to not be able to rely on another country to help us in our defense.
In any case, we have someone "upstairs" watching our back too!
Good.
/because President Obama is going to let the phone ring and ring and ring . . .
143![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:18:22am |
re: #137 scion9
Congress has borderline single digit polling numbers. The only other democratically elected body or politician in the world with that kind of approval rating is Achmedinijad.
The big issue is right now, that if you look at state by state polling, everyone loves their own Congresspeople, and hate everyone elses. Look at Jack Effin Murtha. Look at Teddy Effin Kennedy. National laughing stocks. No risk of losing the incumbency.
I don't have a solution to that. It just seems like a very exploitable area of attack. 70% approval ratings for basically every in their state Congressman from the same sample of people that would give Congress overall 10% seems like a weakness.
Most congressional districts are usually either easy Democrat wins or easy Republican wins, only a handful are truly competitive every 2 years. The entrenched incumbents get the money and the name recognition of being incumbants. Its a hard thing to do to knock off incumbants. Even to get Murtha into a competitive race is an accomplishment.
144![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:19:16am |
re: #140 Fenway_Nation
The president-elect has decreed that avatars 150,000 bytes or bigger need to be redistributed to the avatar-less.
Its going to be a long time until those jokes get old.
145![]() |
Sylvester_T_Cat Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:22:56am |
re: #79 Killian Bundy
You're probably going to call me a moron again, but politicians like Stevens are a huge part of the problem with the Republican party.
Alaska Republicans were aware that both Senator Stevens and US Representative Don Young had problems, and fielded serious challengers to both in the primary election this year. "Serious" as in the primary vote count was pretty danged close. It's that "incumbency" thing I mentioned earlier.
That's what you do if you're serious about building up a political party: Don't like the incumbent? Blow him away in the primary. If you can't do that, hold your nose and vote for him in the main election-- at least you've held his feet to the fire and he knows what will happen next time, if he doesn't get his act together. (If the other party wins, they'll hold the seat forever-- cf. Sen Patty Murray and Sen. Maria Cantvotewell, Ds-WA.)
146![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:24:17am |
Heh....someone's Facebook "status update" reads as follows....
"........is going to celebrate the victory of OBAMA by going with her girls to see MADONNA (for free)"
Of course.....liberals love their free stuff!
147![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:26:30am |
re: #137 scion9
Congress has borderline single digit polling numbers. The only other democratically elected body or politician in the world with that kind of approval rating is Achmedinijad.
The big issue is right now, that if you look at state by state polling, everyone loves their own Congresspeople, and hate everyone elses. Look at Jack Effin Murtha. Look at Teddy Effin Kennedy. National laughing stocks. No risk of losing the incumbency.
I don't have a solution to that. It just seems like a very exploitable area of attack. 70% approval ratings for basically every in their state Congressman from the same sample of people that would give Congress overall 10% seems like a weakness.
The problem there is that there are 435 congressmen/women. And even if 90% of Americans think they suck, it's not their congresscritter that sucks, it's the other person's.
148![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:26:48am |
re: #141 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
I agree, but going for the jugular needs to be done by people that aren't going to put themselves in the spotlight, have 'journalists' dig through their past to find out they are thoroughly corrupt. Those attacks dogs can't stick up for their fellow corruptocrats either. We need an Eliot Ness, and more than one really.
"Troopergate" didn't stick to Palin. What did was character assassination. Not everyone is going to be as susceptible to that kind of attack as a relatively young, relatively inexperienced politically (by the standards of career politicians), woman with a midwestern accent. The media spared no effort in smearing her, but they also had an easy job of it. Like certain other politicians in recent memory, she was more mockable than some.
Most of the partisan hacks on the Right have some of the same 'problems' as Palin. They are mockable. Any right-wing hack is going to be mocked, but the efficacy of being able to do so is what matters.
It is sad that politics have devolved so much into controlling image and message to such a degree, but such it is. The GOP leadership needs to understand this.
149![]() |
little blessing Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:28:05am |
Can someone answer this for me?
Who is the "GOP leadership"?
{LGF}
150![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:28:13am |
re: #143 middlecon
Even to get Murtha into a competitive race is an accomplishment.
Damn, I forgot to check.
/did he [expletive deleted] win?
152![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:30:08am |
Thank you letters to Sarah Palin
You stay classy, koslings!
Earlier I mentioned I was going to write Sarah a supportive thank you letter. I hope some of you will join me in that effort.
153![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:32:27am |
re: #143 middlecon
Most congressional districts are usually either easy Democrat wins or easy Republican wins, only a handful are truly competitive every 2 years. The entrenched incumbents get the money and the name recognition of being incumbants. Its a hard thing to do to knock off incumbants. Even to get Murtha into a competitive race is an accomplishment.
TERM LIMITS! Two terms in the House (4 years), and one in the Senate (6 years). And once you get out, you cannot be a lobbyist OR be related for 10 years.
154![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:32:44am |
re: #151 scion9
He won in a landslide.
I guess all those racist rednecks are like Jews voting for Obama. a big mystery.
/how he ever achieved the rank of Marine Colonel is beyond me
155![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:33:39am |
Morning little blessing. Welcome to the War Room. ;)
156![]() |
little blessing Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:34:14am |
157![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:34:20am |
Fascinating- I left a comment at Hillbuzz this morning, and they didn't publish it. Thanks, Hillbuzz. I promote your sorry puma asses and you can't even publish my comment. Done with you.
158![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:35:38am |
re: #153 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
TERM LIMITS! Two terms in the House (4 years), and one in the Senate (6 years). And once you get out, you cannot be a lobbyist OR be related for 10 years.
I'm all for term limits, the problem seems to be that too many politicians once elected 'change their mind' IE get power hungry and don't want to step down.
160![]() |
shiplord kirel Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:36:15am |
It's starting to set in.
At first, I fell back on my training and experience, controlled my feelings, evaluated the situation rationally, formulated a plan of response, and tried to urge others to similarly maintain control, calm, and confidence in the future.
Now though.......
WHAT THE FUCK! WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK! THAT GODDAMN EMPTY SUIT LEFTIE IS GOING TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!
AAARRRGGGHHH!
(Excuse me while I curl up in the fetal position and whimper for a moment..)
161![]() |
shiplord kirel Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:37:25am |
re: #149 little blessing
Can someone answer this for me?
Who is the "GOP leadership"?
{LGF}
(Looks around)
I think it's us.
162![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:37:59am |
re: #156 little blessing
Figuring out how we can do it better next time. Rule one the enemy of my enemy is their enemy no more no less.
163![]() |
Rancher Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:38:13am |
re: #149 little blessing
Who is the "GOP leadership"?
Bush, Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Whip Roy Blunt and Deputy Whip Eric Cantor. Republican Conference chairman Adam Putnam will step down with Jeb Hensarling favored to replace him.
164![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:38:24am |
re: #157 Sharmuta
Fascinating- I left a comment at Hillbuzz this morning, and they didn't publish it. Thanks, Hillbuzz. I promote your sorry puma asses and you can't even publish my comment. Done with you.
Hillbuzz was always a little gossipy for me, not only did the PUMAs not show up, I think they were a myth. In Indiana at least, Obama got 13% of Republicans and McCain got 11% of Democrats. A wash.
165![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:38:37am |
re: #157 Sharmuta
Fascinating- I left a comment at Hillbuzz this morning, and they didn't publish it. Thanks, Hillbuzz. I promote your sorry puma asses and you can't even publish my comment. Done with you.
I was reading them on election night, and suddenly the whole site went "must log in" to read.
When it went back to an open-to-all mode, a few threads and a bunch of comments were gone.
A lot of the posters over there, both Dem and Rep, seem to think the whole thing was some sort of scam or fraud. Any ideas what that is about?
166![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:39:11am |
re: #160 shiplord kirel
It's starting to set in.
At first, I fell back on my training and experience, controlled my feelings, evaluated the situation rationally, formulated a plan of response, and tried to urge others to similarly maintain control, calm, and confidence in the future.
Now though.......
WHAT THE FUCK! WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK! THAT GODDAMN EMPTY SUIT LEFTIE IS GOING TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!
AAARRRGGGHHH!
(Excuse me while I curl up in the fetal position and whimper for a moment..)
I had my comment deleted meltdown last night.
/it started with "at least Carter was a naval officer . . ."
167![]() |
ibmkeyboard Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:41:24am |
A few thoughts about Bambi's religious revival service and party after his election. From PJ media. A good read.
I suppose I got caught up in the emotion of the night due almost exclusively to the genuine and copious tears of black Americans. The ones I spoke to and interviewed were nearly speechless with joy. With a start, I realized something that had escaped me all these long months of writing and thinking about this race. For many African-Americans, this election was a spiritual event
It reminded me of a black church meeting. Everyone jumping up and down and feeling the ‘Spirit’. But the good feeling ended quickly when the world markets began looking into this new presidents desires for tax and spend and American isolation on the World Trade markets and NAFTA. Also his desires to withdraw American forces from Iraq and whatever else he plans to do in Afghanistan or Pakistan. Remember: “I will do whatever it takes to get Bin Laden.” When the market dropped almost ‘500′ points I knew then that we don’t have to worry about a Democrat controlled Congress or a Black president. The world is now out of any presidents or congressional control, go ask the president that is leaving office. Going back and trying to stop NAFTA or World Trade is impossible, we no longer have a manufacturing base. We have been sold to the cheapest bidder, China, India or wherever. Hell, even China stopped making Disney toys and Barbies for Christmas. What is Mattel planning to do?
In conclusion- anything Spiritual this president tries to do or use control against the markets will die in the World Trade of cold hard facts. And those poor black people that were crying and weeping for joy will wake up to the harsh reality that Mr. Obama is no Messiah or Moses, he will not ‘fill their gas tanks and make their mortgage payments,’ because the World Trade Markets and NAFTA wont let him,
go ask Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.
168![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:41:29am |
re: #165 stevieray
A lot of the posters over there, both Dem and Rep, seem to think the whole thing was some sort of scam or fraud. Any ideas what that is about?
Maybe it was just one or two people doing the whole thing.
169![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:42:39am |
re: #154 Killian Bundy
I guess all those racist rednecks are like Jews voting for Obama. a big mystery.
/how he ever achieved the rank of Marine Colonel is beyond me
Easy, the same way he won an election. The military is just as political, only worse, because lives are directly at stake. Our CO in Iraq was a POS who tried to hang us out to dry more than once. He would fail to disseminate information, but would be first in line to tell us how bad we f-ked up when our lack of information got us in trouble. We finally learned to do our job and keep our mouths shut. As one NCO put it, "This country started going downhill the day Officers realized it's safe enough to get in a humvee and drive around."
170![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:43:00am |
re: #164 middlecon
PUMAs were not a myth- there is no was they could astroturf something that widespread. Dozens and dozens of blogs and posters. Big name hillary supports like Lynn Rothschild. No- pumas are real. Hopefully they'll reexamine their political thinking and stay away from the democrats.
The problem Tuesday is we did not get out our vote.
171![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:43:14am |
re: #160 shiplord kirel
Now you see, your problem is in your genes. Me, I inherited a wicked sense of humor, peppered with centuries of Eastern European shtetl hardships, a smattering of Talmud/Torah, and an enhanced irony meter.
While I admit that it took several hours to kick in yesterday, when it finally did I realized that what we saw the other day was AN ENTIRE GENERATION VOTED AWAY THE PROSPERITY AND COMFORT THAT MOM AND DAD WORKED HARD TO PROVIDE FOR THEM.
A couple hours of giggling and I'm happy to report that my equalibrium has returned.
172![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:43:18am |
re: #160 shiplord kirel
It's starting to set in.
At first, I fell back on my training and experience, controlled my feelings, evaluated the situation rationally, formulated a plan of response, and tried to urge others to similarly maintain control, calm, and confidence in the future.
Now though.......
WHAT THE FUCK! WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK! THAT GODDAMN EMPTY SUIT LEFTIE IS GOING TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!
AAARRRGGGHHH!
(Excuse me while I curl up in the fetal position and whimper for a moment..)
Hey, look at the bright side, he starts getting fully classified briefings today.
/think they'll tell him about the space aliens?
173![]() |
Ozark Mountain Daredevil Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:44:55am |
re: #148 scion9
I agree, but going for the jugular needs to be done by people that aren't going to put themselves in the spotlight, have 'journalists' dig through their past to find out they are thoroughly corrupt. Those attacks dogs can't stick up for their fellow corruptocrats either. We need an Eliot Ness, and more than one really.
"Troopergate" didn't stick to Palin. What did was character assassination. Not everyone is going to be as susceptible to that kind of attack as a relatively young, relatively inexperienced politically (by the standards of career politicians), woman with a midwestern accent. The media spared no effort in smearing her, but they also had an easy job of it. Like certain other politicians in recent memory, she was more mockable than some.
Most of the partisan hacks on the Right have some of the same 'problems' as Palin. They are mockable. Any right-wing hack is going to be mocked, but the efficacy of being able to do so is what matters.
It is sad that politics have devolved so much into controlling image and message to such a degree, but such it is. The GOP leadership needs to understand this.
I'll answer you, but as soon as I'm done I'm outta here, since I'm not counting on, nor do I want Obama to pay my mortgage or for my gas.
The attacks against Sarah Palin had nothing to do with her age. John McCain got attacked because he was too old.
Palin was "Not experienced enough" to be Veep, even though she had run a state, yet Obama's qualifications were never questioned by the MSM.
Crap, I'm outta here. Hae a good night all
174![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:45:01am |
re: #168 Adina in Judea
Maybe it was just one or two people doing the whole thing.
I don't know. I only started checking it out a month ago... never got a chance to get a deep understanding of the place. First impressions can be misleading.
175![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:45:03am |
re: #170 Sharmuta
Ok, but why don't any of the exit polls show that any larger number of usual Democrats voted for McCain? There might have been many PUMAs but they didn't add up to more than the usual Democratic support for the Republican candidate than any other year.
176![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:46:27am |
re: #171 littleoldlady
While I admit that it took several hours to kick in yesterday, when it finally did I realized that what we saw the other day was AN ENTIRE GENERATION VOTED AWAY THE PROSPERITY AND COMFORT THAT MOM AND DAD WORKED HARD TO PROVIDE FOR THEM.
They took it for granted and now it's going bye-bye.
A couple hours of giggling and I'm happy to report that my equalibrium has returned.
Waiting for that feeling myself!
Do you have an extra fruitcup?
You're the fruitcup provider, right?
177![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:46:57am |
re: #165 stevieray
I saw some of that too. They still have folks calling them a scam. My comment this morning wasn't even about that, so I don't know why they didn't publish what I wrote. They don't get it- this election didn't cure them of liberalism like it did for other pumas.
178![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:47:09am |
re: #175 middlecon
Maybe it was all ingrained reflex. They just voted the way they have always done? One explanation that would probably fit.
179![]() |
Rancher Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:47:27am |
Listen folks, this election, like most I've seen in my 50 years, came down to people's perception of the economy. Unless Obama is pretty centrists in his economic policy, which means controlling Pelosi et all, we should be able to elect whomever we choose to run in 2012. Maybe even gain some seats in the midterm elections. Just try and survive till then. I'm going to go back to the prison, those jobs should be pretty safe.
180![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:47:38am |
re: #152 Sharmuta
I don't have it in me to wade through the Kos septic tank tonight. Quite frankly, I'm getting tired of certain people insisting that I jettison most of my beliefs so that some RINOs can get elected somewhere down the line.
And frankly, the Dems starting with the president-elect on down can take their fucking faux-concilliatory bullshit and shove it. I resent them lumping me into some cluster of abstract category of boogeymen strawmen (Catholic, pro-free market, pro-2nd amendment, pro-military) that paints me as a greater existential threat to the continued well-being of the United States than the 19 hijackers who slammed fully fuelled commercial airliners into two skyscrapers and the Pentagon. Fuck them....and more to the point, fuck their little lapdogs and quislings in the MSM, blogosphere and campuses.
Once they chose to go down that road, there's no more shake-hands-and-play-nice with them afterwards.
181![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:47:57am |
re: #175 middlecon
lol- the pumas I read planned to lie to the exit pollers.
182![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:48:40am |
re: #180 Fenway_Nation
I don't have it in me to wade through the Kos septic tank tonight. Quite frankly, I'm getting tired of certain people insisting that I jettison most of my beliefs so that some RINOs can get elected somewhere down the line.
What beliefs?
183![]() |
little blessing Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:48:50am |
re: #163 Rancher
Thanks for answering. The only one I ever heard of is Bush.
184![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:49:07am |
re: #176 Adina in Judea
Fruitcup is serves at 5 am Eastern time, Adina.
redc1c4 provides the Special Edition No Pain version.
185![]() |
capitalist piglet Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:49:40am |
re: #127 scion9
That is true, but polls show that 4/5ths of Americans mistrust the media. A lot of the GOP campaign angles didn't stick to Obama, but they did stick to the media. 93% of Journalist are self identified as 'liberal', and probably a higher precentage is Democrat.
They openly admit to being biased in editorials, but then say that they are professionals and keep the bias out of it. No one believes it. If the GOP wanted to, and it should, it needs to continue to push that angle and paint themselves as the recievers of undeserved floggings by the media.
The media coverage will continue to be biased. Don't doubt it. Don't let anyone else doubt it either.
I think one could expect bias in an editorial - it's the straight news that always seems to bend left that bugs the hell out of me. I've laughed out loud at the sheer audacity of many an ABC News break on the radio.
186![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:49:55am |
re: #179 Rancher
Unless Obama is pretty centrists in his economic policy, which means controlling Pelosi et all, we should be able to elect whomever we choose to run in 2012. Maybe even gain some seats in the midterm elections. Just try and survive till then.
Weren't some CEOs predicting that Obambi would run the country into bankruptcy within three years?
It could be a long and scary four years.
187![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:50:15am |
re: #169 logboy
safe enough to get in a humvee and drive around."
Was it "uparmored"?
/I realize that's a very sensitive question, but does it make any difference against Iranian shaped charges?
188![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:50:15am |
Sharmuta,
The comment(s) I posted at Hillbuzz took several hours to appear on the site.
190![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:50:33am |
re: #184 littleoldlady
Fruitcup is serves at 5 am Eastern time, Adina.
redc1c4 provides the Special Edition No Pain version.
Believe me you will want the no pain version.
/after a month of this I will start policing again. we will need all our marbles in the coming times ahead.
191![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:50:49am |
re: #177 Sharmuta
Well, at least this election cured them of trusting the MSM. They will never go back to blindly believing what the TV tells them.
And I think most of them [the commenters] no longer see Republicans as pig-ignorant neanderthals... just as people with a different POV.
192![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:50:57am |
193![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:51:05am |
re: #188 littleoldlady
I commented in the morning. Not there.
194![]() |
Karridine Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:51:19am |
re: #171 littleoldlady
"We'll vote for change! We'll change from grateful and free to enslaved and poor! We'll GET something for NOTHING! For the first time in 6,000 years of recorded history, we'll get SOMETHING for nothing more than a VOTE!
Tell us, Obama! What do we get?"
Enslavement, you fools! WE are your masters now, and only a revolution can free you! Bwahahahaha!
"Yaaay, thank you, Obama!"
195![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:51:25am |
re: #184 littleoldlady
Fruitcup is serves at 5 am Eastern time, Adina.
Yay - it's 4:50am right now. :)
196![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:51:30am |
re: #171 littleoldlady
While I admit that it took several hours to kick in yesterday, when it finally did I realized that what we saw the other day was AN ENTIRE GENERATION VOTED AWAY THE PROSPERITY AND COMFORT THAT MOM AND DAD WORKED HARD TO PROVIDE FOR THEM.
Actually, considering how likely it is that Obama will only continue deficit spending and reduce America's ability to grow the economy, they voted away the prosperity of their own children.
197![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:51:32am |
I don't know what woke me up but, I could not get back to sleep. I'm tired but, my mind is going 90 m.p.h. and it's all bad. A buncha' ignorant people elected a communist to the White House.
199![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:52:45am |
re: #186 Adina in Judea
Weren't some CEOs predicting that Obambi would run the country into bankruptcy within three years?
It could be a long and scary four years.
Bozo hasn't even taken the reigns yet and the stock market already took a steep dive. So apparently everyone thinks we're screwed. I should have sold off when I had the chance.
200![]() |
I heart the USA Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:52:54am |
re: #141 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
And that is my point. We cannot expect to get fair treatment as long as the MSM is 80-90% in the tank for the libs...
So we have to forget this "let's all get along" bullshit and go for their jugular...I'm sick and tired of us having to be nice, when every time we do it we get f*cked!
FUCKIN'-A RIGHT! Enough with our observing the Marquess of Queensbury rules while they bite our ankles and punch our kidneys! McCain took too much off the table. He should have known that the MSM were never going to expose Obamarx and his campaign should have been doing the research themselves and getting it all out there.
201![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:53:07am |
re: #182 Sharmuta
The whole 'Social Conservative' thing....there was that Frum article up earlier implying that's what cost McCain the election.
202![]() |
RTLM Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:53:35am |
re: #188 littleoldlady
Sharmuta,
The comment(s) I posted at Hillbuzz took several hours to appear on the site.
That happens to me a lot.
But they always manage to get up there.
(waves a-LOW-ha's)
203![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:53:39am |
All I can say is....let's hope we're all wrong.
204![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:53:48am |
re: #196 scion9
Actually, considering how likely it is that Obama will only continue deficit spending and reduce America's ability to grow the economy, they voted away the prosperity of their own children.
The sad thing is you could say we all did that in the 2000 and 2004 elections :( I respect Pres. Bush but he has grown the defecit unabated. :(
205![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:54:43am |
re: #201 Fenway_Nation
What do you think being a conservative means?
206![]() |
Sylvester_T_Cat Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:54:48am |
re: #154 Killian Bundy
I guess all those racist rednecks are like Jews voting for Obama. a big mystery.
/how he ever achieved the rank of Marine Colonel is beyond me
Imho: Almost all his career was Reserve. That's great, but there's a wrinkle: After WWII a lot of veterans became Congressmen but wanted to maintain military reserve membership. Naturally the military services wanted these Congressmen on their side. Each service set up special DC-area reserve units to make this possible. Some fine people like Sen. Goldwater irr were reservists in this manner. And one not-so-fine, perhaps.
/I would bet that almost all of Col. Murtha's promotions happened with political motives in mind. Don't guess we'll ever know for sure.
207![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:55:02am |
re: #185 capitalist piglet
I think one could expect bias in an editorial - it's the straight news that always seems to bend left that bugs the hell out of me. I've laughed out loud at the sheer audacity of many an ABC News break on the radio.
I meant, that in editorials about broader media bias including in the news, they have admitted to being biased.
208![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:55:36am |
re: #196 scion9
Actually, considering how likely it is that Obama will only continue deficit spending and reduce America's ability to grow the economy, they voted away the prosperity of their own children.
Children?! These kids can't think past their next kegger.
But the upside is that for the first time in many of their young lives they are finally going to understand the definition of the word CONSEQUENCES.
209![]() |
Moe Katz Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:55:40am |
210![]() |
I heart the USA Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:55:55am |
re: #152 Sharmuta
Thank you letters to Sarah Palin
You stay classy, koslings!
Earlier I mentioned I was going to write Sarah a supportive thank you letter. I hope some of you will join me in that effort.
I certainly did! Thanks for providing the link. I am going to provide the yin to that yang by sending a scathing letter of condemnation to O'Reilly.
211![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:55:58am |
re: #197 MandyManners
I don't know what woke me up but, I could not get back to sleep. I'm tired but, my mind is going 90 m.p.h. and it's all bad. A buncha' ignorant people elected a communist to the White House.
Tuesday evening, I refused to learn the outcome of the election. I wanted one more night's sleep without knowing if the communist won.
I had the most political dreams of my life - all conservative and all good!
I don't remember them in detail, but I remember feeling very happy!
Then I woke and checked the news. I'm glad I had one last night without it.
212![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:57:23am |
re: #204 middlecon
The sad thing is you could say we all did that in the 2000 and 2004 elections :( I respect Pres. Bush but he has grown the defecit unabated. :(
Yes, we certainly did. Redistributing wealth from the future to the present. However, I don't think anyone could have guessed that Bush was going to do that in 2000 based on his campaign, and come 2004 the issue was the war, not the economy.
213![]() |
capitalist piglet Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:57:38am |
re: #207 scion9
I meant, that in editorials about broader media bias including in the news, they have admitted to being biased.
Oh, I'm sorry - I misinterpreted you.
214![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:58:24am |
re: #205 Sharmuta
Clinging bitterly to guns and religion? Antipathy towards people not like them?
215![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:58:39am |
Morning Mandy. I hope you don't have to many nights like this.
216![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:58:40am |
re: #213 capitalist piglet
Oh, I'm sorry - I misinterpreted you.
Yeah. Rereading what I wrote, I can understand how it could be read that way.
217![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:59:06am |
re: #205 Sharmuta
What do you think being a conservative means?
You eat one cookie now and save the other for later.
218![]() |
Karridine Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:59:11am |
re: #209 Moe Katz
Thanks, Moe! Some thoughts on Obama's seizure of presidency...
219![]() |
ibmkeyboard Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:59:15am |
re: #186 Adina in Judea
Weren't some CEOs predicting that Obambi would run the country into bankruptcy within three years?
It could be a long and scary four years.
When he goes spinning off to the left and tries to control NAFTA and World Trade,
I give the country 2 years.
Use your money, or any money you get from the govt. to buy food storage.
canned goods MREs etc. You will not be able to eat Gold, stocks and bonds.
If you don't believe me, wait until people begin starving because their local markets close because it cant make a profit or cant afford health care.
Scary shit.
220![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 1:59:31am |
re: #217 logboy
You eat one fruitcup and save it for later.
221![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:00:02am |
Good morning, afternoon, evening *everyone*!™
Fruitcup is on the buffet ------------------------->
Help yourselves!
222![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:00:38am |
re: #7 middlecon
I'll give Obama a chance and hope he does well as President, I never want to be like the moonbats and openly hate an American President, life is too short.
I hated Jimmy Carter. How in the world is that moonbattish? I love this country and he did it almost irreparable damage.
And what exactly do we mean by "give Obama a chance," anyway? It's out of our hands now. But the man has spent his entire adult life serving a left-wing agenda, and I have no confidence whatsoever he even KNOWS any other way. His brain just doesn't work any other way. If "giving him a chance" means letting him implement even .01% of his stated Leftist agenda, then I hope he is ferociously opposed from day one.
223![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:01:00am |
Correction: The site that demanded a log-on was Hillary Clinton Forum, not HillBuzz. Probably unimportant, but I just wanna set the record straight.
HillBuzz is the one with all of the accusations, though.
224![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:01:20am |
re: #221 littleoldlady
Good morning, afternoon, evening *everyone*!™
Fruitcup is on the buffet ------------------------->
Help yourselves!
Maybe four yeard of Red's fruitcup and I just might make it....
225![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:01:50am |
re: #219 ibmkeyboard
When he goes spinning off to the left and tries to control NAFTA and World Trade,
I give the country 2 years.Use your money, or any money you get from the govt. to buy food storage.
canned goods MREs etc. You will not be able to eat Gold, stocks and bonds.If you don't believe me, wait until people begin starving because their local markets close because it cant make a profit or cant afford health care.
Scary shit.
My whole life I have avoided doom and gloom scenarios, and while I disagree with all of Obama's policies, I don't think we are headed for complete calamity. America survived 8 years of Clinton and I'm sure we can survive 4 years of obama.
I'll go on record to forecast slow growth under Obama, basically the same that would happen if Bush had stayed. I believe in America.
226![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:01:56am |
re: #214 Fenway_Nation
Clinging bitterly to guns and religion? Antipathy towards people not like them?
Really?
To me, being a conservative means I believe in smaller government. I believe the government should be fiscally responsible and keep their nose out of my business.
You can cling to your Bible and guns all you want- the Constitution says so. But promoting a religious agenda is not what conservatism means to me and millions of other republicans.
227![]() |
Rancher Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:03:36am |
re: #183 little blessing
LOL, and he's leaving. GOP in tatters, looks to regroup
Nearly two dozen prominent conservatives planned to meet in Virginia on Thursday to try to chart a path going forward. A fight for the chairmanship of the Republican National Committee is expected; several state party chiefs are maneuvering for the top national job even though Mike Duncan is said to want to stay in the post. And plenty of prospective White House hopefuls seem to be lining up for the chance to run against President-elect Obama in 2012.
McCain running mate Sarah Palin has signaled that she will remain on the national political scene. She says: "I'm not doing this for naught." Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who lost the nomination this year, has restarted his political action committee. And, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal is heading to the leadoff caucus state of Iowa on Nov. 22 to deliver the keynote address to a conservative group. Any number of other Republicans may test the waters as well.
228![]() |
Crux Australis Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:03:44am |
I have been thinking about the election and I believe that America made the wrong choice.
Australia is less secure economically and militarily- What of the Australia- US FTA? What about the military alliance?
And another thing I'm depressed about is the probability of never seeing Sarah Palin again. Not happy.
229![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:03:47am |
re: #219 ibmkeyboard
When he goes spinning off to the left and tries to control NAFTA and World Trade,
I give the country 2 years.Use your money, or any money you get from the govt. to buy food storage.
canned goods MREs etc. You will not be able to eat Gold, stocks and bonds.If you don't believe me, wait until people begin starving because their local markets close because it cant make a profit or cant afford health care.
Scary shit.
I'm heading back to Israel in one more month. I think things will be ok there but I do tend to store up on non-perishable food anyway. It's my habit so that I don't end up needing to run out because the kitchen is empty.
230![]() |
ibmkeyboard Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:03:56am |
re: #221 littleoldlady
Good morning, afternoon, evening *everyone*!™
Fruitcup is on the buffet ------------------------->
Help yourselves!
If you have any left over can I put it in a freezer bag and store it at home.
ha.
231![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:03:59am |
Thanks for the fruitcup littleoldlady. We can always count on you.
232![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:04:07am |
re: #222 Tigger2005
I'm just saying I'm not going to root for a President to fail based only on political differences. If Obama is the country's greatest President (extremely unlikely I know) I don't want to be pouting about political differences. I want to see him succeed not fail. Country first as John McCain would say.
233![]() |
I heart the USA Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:04:12am |
re: #152 Sharmuta
Thank you letters to Sarah Palin
You stay classy, koslings!
Earlier I mentioned I was going to write Sarah a supportive thank you letter. I hope some of you will join me in that effort.
Oops, this isn't the link I picked up in the other thread! That one was for emailing Gov. Palin. Sorry, I won't wade through the muck at that site. I'm fresh out of tomato juice so I'll never get the skunk stench out.
236![]() |
infidel4ever Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:05:17am |
re: #44 xop1
This made me laugh - it's from the blog of Margot Wallstrom, Vice President of the European Commission. Her posting is so devoid of rational thought, so mind-numbingly naive that it almost comes across as retarded. The scary bit is that this is what passes for enlightened thinking amongst European politicians.
"Hurried up to watch early TV-news this morning and cheered together with my youngest son for Barack Obama’s over-whelming victory!
YES – there are huge problems ahead of him and the USA,
YES – expectations may be too high,
YES – he will probably face dangers of all kinds,
YES – he is rather inexperienced and young,
YES – he might be tempted to take protectionist measures,BUT – he embodies CHANGE!
He has mobilized young people, poor people, the Afro-American population.
He signals a willingness to co-operate – including with the EU on climate change and HE is clearly intelligent, hard working and well organised,
He managed to get people off the couch, to donate money and to engage in the local campaign activities"
[Link: blogs.ec.europa.eu...]Yes, really.
Saw a Dutch guy on tv today who is/was a correspondent for the Dutch media in the States for years. He enthused about Obama because his twelve year old son said: "Obama's victory brought tears to my eyes." Wow, that man inspires everybody, even my twelve year old! Good grief. The guy also thought that Obama needs to tackle the environmental problems first.
Does anybody know what they put in the water nowadays?
237![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:05:40am |
Alright all, I need sleep. I get to wrestle with the VA over my disability rating tomorrow (today). They gave me a temporary rating of 100% instead of a permanent rating. Apparently there is a possibility my right arm and the large portion of my left hand that were blown off might grow back. Whodathunkit?
238![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:05:40am |
re: #211 Adina in Judea
Tuesday evening, I refused to learn the outcome of the election. I wanted one more night's sleep without knowing if the communist won.
I had the most political dreams of my life - all conservative and all good!
I don't remember them in detail, but I remember feeling very happy!
Then I woke and checked the news. I'm glad I had one last night without it.
I wish I could've done that but The Kid had an assignment about it and we had to watch television. My dreams that night included one in which George Soros told me that he really didn't want CBBHO to win and invited me to his weekend place for some fishing as a way of apologizing.
239![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:06:21am |
re: #226 Sharmuta
Really?
To me, being a conservative means I believe in smaller government. I believe the government should be fiscally responsible and keep their nose out of my business.
You can cling to your Bible and guns all you want- the Constitution says so. But promoting a religious agenda is not what conservatism means to me and millions of other republicans.
So the government is gonna get smaller over the next 4 years? Interesting....
I never said promoting a religious agenda was important to me, but is it really wise for 'conservatives' to go out of their way to start looking down on religion the same manner as so many libs do?
240![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:06:25am |
re: #228 Crux Australis
I have been thinking about the election and I believe that America made the wrong choice.
Ya think?
241![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:07:08am |
re: #225 middlecon
My whole life I have avoided doom and gloom scenarios, and while I disagree with all of Obama's policies, I don't think we are headed for complete calamity. America survived 8 years of Clinton and I'm sure we can survive 4 years of obama.
I'll go on record to forecast slow growth under Obama, basically the same that would happen if Bush had stayed. I believe in America.
8 years, but with a lot of republicans in the house and senate for a lot of that time period, remember?
242![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:07:32am |
re: #187 Killian Bundy
Was it "uparmored"?
/I realize that's a very sensitive question, but does it make any difference against Iranian shaped charges?
Okay, I'll attempt to answer my own question. I think it hardly matters.
/stop putting troops in HUMVEES in red zones
243![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:08:25am |
re: #236 infidel4ever
Does anybody know what they put in the water nowadays?
I'm getting a Jonestown vibe....
244![]() |
aboo-Hoo-Hoo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:08:26am |
re: #142 Killian Bundy
Good.
/because President Obama is going to let the phone ring and ring and ring . . .
We aren't fighting a war where there's going to be any ringing phones; a nuclear ladder; any warnings.
One second a city will be there, the next it won't. Or maybe some will get news of people flopping around like fish-out-of-water will burst into the news - but we won't know why, from where or from whom.
With Obama's finger steady on the 'Dialog Button' a lot of good that's gunna do.
Rosy thoughts.
245![]() |
Crux Australis Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:08:36am |
246![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:09:44am |
re: #225 middlecon
My whole life I have avoided doom and gloom scenarios, and while I disagree with all of Obama's policies, I don't think we are headed for complete calamity. America survived 8 years of Clinton and I'm sure we can survive 4 years of obama.
I'll go on record to forecast slow growth under Obama, basically the same that would happen if Bush had stayed. I believe in America.
What if he and his comrades in Congress bankrupt and destroy coal? Pursue other disastrous policies to further their green agenda, which is just another Communist tool?
247![]() |
ibmkeyboard Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:10:13am |
re: #225 middlecon
My whole life I have avoided doom and gloom scenarios, and while I disagree with all of Obama's policies, I don't think we are headed for complete calamity. America survived 8 years of Clinton and I'm sure we can survive 4 years of obama.
I'll go on record to forecast slow growth under Obama, basically the same that would happen if Bush had stayed. I believe in America.
I have already been told that within two years we can no longer buy food storage items from a main supplier. He will not be able to support his employees under Obamas tax and spend health care plans.
I believe in being prepared and you believe in slow growth.
Without food,
I promise you slow growth.
248![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:10:24am |
De rien, y'all!
Another point of irony...if Barney Frank manages to get his 25% cut in the defense budget, one can only wonder how much of that will be coming out of our European presence.
SOMEBODY'S gonna have to start paying for their own security.
Those Europeans are going to really love America then!
249![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:10:45am |
250![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:10:45am |
re: #239 Fenway_Nation
Just because I think my political party should promote a religious agenda doesn't mean I'm looking down on religion.
And no- the government is not going to get smaller in the next four years. Where did I say that? I said that's what being a conservative means to me- smaller, less intrusive government. I realize this is touchy for some people, but we have to find some consensus here. Fiscal conservatives are pissed, and we're not going to win elections with republicans spending money like democrats. That's why we've been losing.
That line in the sand I mentioned before? This is my line. Fiscal restraint. If we cross it, we stand for nothing.
251![]() |
Rancher Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:11:06am |
Just from an emergency preparedness point of view stocking up on food and medicine is a good idea. In a high inflation environment, which is where we are going, it makes even more sense. If you buy a basket of goods with today's dollars that will be worth allot more in the future then you have in effect realized a gain on your investment, and it's tax free.
252![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:11:18am |
re: #238 MandyManners
My dreams that night included one in which George Soros told me that he really didn't want CBBHO to win and invited me to his weekend place for some fishing as a way of apologizing.
He should have promised to donate a billion dollars to the Repubs in 2012! :)
I'll work on having that dream.
253![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:11:38am |
And I sure wonder how many of the DUMBASSES who voted for Obama are having second thoughts already. I thought I might feel better today. I don't. Last night I had a painfully stiff neck, and I'm pretty sure it was psychological. I had to go to bed early. Right now I have a heavy feeling in the pit of my stomach. I can't think of a single good thing that might come out of an Obama Presidency. Not one.
I am sick of reading the people saying "No one voted for McCain/Palin, they voted against Obama." I damn well DID vote FOR McCain/Palin, and I'm proud of it. I had confidence in McCain to do the right thing on national security matters. I have not an ounce of confidence in Obama to do a single right thing on that issue. He simply won't. He's incapable of it. Let's face it, people. There's no hope of such a thing happening. This isn't even a Chamberlain we've got here ... even Chamberlain grew a spine at the last minute. This is a Carter at an even more critical and dangerous point in history.
We are facing a very scary four years, if we make it that far.
Sorry I can't find any silver lining in any of this.
254![]() |
westbankmama Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:11:58am |
re: 154 Killian, the Jews who voted for Obama are more left-wing than Jewish. The Orthodox Jews are right wing and almost always vote Republican.
re: 160 Shiplord - In Israel we say "ani mishtatef im tza'archa" to someone who has lost a loved one. It means "I participate in your pain" or in plainer English I sympathize.
255![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:13:58am |
256![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:14:15am |
re: #247 ibmkeyboard
Without food,
I promise you slow growth.
This is the part where Obambi will make everyone skinny.
Those of us who are already skinny will really need to hoard food!
257![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:14:32am |
re: #241 logboy
8 years, but with a lot of republicans in the house and senate for a lot of that time period, remember?
So without Republicans in the house and senate under Clinton there would have been a financial calamity and food shortages?
America has been through so much, one bad President is not enough to ruin this great country of ours.
258![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:15:55am |
re: #187 Killian Bundy
Was it "uparmored"?
/I realize that's a very sensitive question, but does it make any difference against Iranian shaped charges?
I'm living proof uparmored doesn't necessarily mean shit. My humvee was hit on my side by an Iranian made EFP, or Explosive Formed Projectile, while leading a convoy through Baghdad. It came through my window, traveled directly in front of my face, taking my right arm and a large portion of my left hand off in the process.
They caught the guy two weeks later when he set off another one. He was an Iranian Weapons Expert operating in that section of Baghdad. My colonel said he killed over 20 soldiers before they caught him. I guess I was one of the lucky ones.
Please no sympathy posts, I'm really tired of hearing them. As my DS used to say, "If you want sympathy, its in the dictionary between shit and syphilis."
259![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:16:20am |
I look forward to finally being svelte.
/what I'm going to do with talloldman and his bony butt...I haven't a clue. ;-)
260![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:16:53am |
re: #255 Fenway_Nation
Then quit thinking you're a soc-con and deal with being a small governemnt conservative.
I think we lost because fia-cons are pissed, many stayed home. But if we are not a party of fiscal restraint, we are done. People do not want religion and politics being mixed together. God love them, really- I mean it, but the religious conservatives need to realize they're hurting us when they promote religion as the benchmark of conservatism. It's the furthest thing from it.
261![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:17:29am |
re: #257 middlecon
So without Republicans in the house and senate under Clinton there would have been a financial calamity and food shortages?
America has been through so much, one bad President is not enough to ruin this great country of ours.
Clinton was not a Communist.
262![]() |
ibmkeyboard Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:17:48am |
re: #256 Adina in Judea
This is the part where Obambi will make everyone skinny.
Those of us who are already skinny will really need to hoard food!
ha.
I will finally be able to get rid of that 40 lbs of lard ass I carry.
/sorry for the A$$ remark.
Obama will have his own presidential fitness program,
NO FOOD
264![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:18:58am |
re: #258 logboy
Sorry, EFP is Explosive Formed Penetrator. I'm too tired to be typing right now.
265![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:19:36am |
re: #261 MandyManners
Clinton was not a Communist.
Ok maybe Obama is a communist in his head...but do you really think he's going to govern as a Communist? Completely collectivize the state in 4 years? Is that his real plan?
The guy is straight out of the DNC playbook, he has no new ideas, he will do what he is told by the DNC. As far as I know they don't publicize their communist leanings.
266![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:20:15am |
re: #262 ibmkeyboard
Obama will have his own presidential fitness program,
NO FOOD
Well, he did say awhile back that Americans couldn't expect to keep homes at 72 degrees and eat whatever is wanted while expecting the world to say it's ok.
I guess the world has nixed the food thing altogether.
267![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:21:21am |
re: #180 Fenway_Nation
I do agree that the 'social conservative' angle being pushed by Frum and others is a boogie man right now. I'm an east coast, non-socially conservative, more libertarian leaning fellow, but I honestly don't see how social conservative issues hurt McCain at all.
The issues that matter most to that group were barely touched upon this election, and when they were it was hardly controversial. Both Biden and Palin came out as against gay marriage. Obama and McCain to the best of my knowledge never touched it. On the pro-life front, it looks like McCain actually gained ground with Catholic voters.
The propoganda surrounding pro-life issues needs to be disregarded. I live in a very urbane, relatively affluent area in a blue state. Maybe in the SF Bay Area people think you should be tossing crying infants into trash cans like Barack Obama, but even here people aren't big on abortion.
Pro-life is gaining ground in Democrat/liberal circles, and there isn't any valid data showing it losing ground in Republican circles. It is a winning issue. "Reproductive Rights" doesn't resonate with the man and women on the street. The moniker of pro-choice being abandoned, and defining abortion as a Civil Right is the new battleground. The ability to 'choose' isn't resonating so the language is being changed. Maybe the meme will spread, maybe it won't but that a new slogan is needed to continue the issue means that they are on the run in this particular arena.
The media continually thumps on about how illegal immigration is not an issue to, but the issue resonates heavily with both Dems and Republicans. It might not be the only issue that decides their votes, but there is an active campaign on part of both parties and the media to sideline this issue, and paint America as being past the discussion.
The do the same thing with pro-life/pro-choice debates.
I'd say that, despite the turnout for prop 8, and similar victories in Arizona and Florida that gay marriage is a losing issue for Republicans. If they really wanted to claim a stake, they should be battling the concept of State Marriage from a libertarian stance. Strict seperation of the State from the Church.
A lot of the gay marriage as a Civil Right is really posturing by the Dems, in order to attack churches for violation of Civil Rights, redefining traditionalist Churches as being bigoted for sticking to their theology (while meanwhile giving Rev. Wright et al a pass) in not marrying gay couples. LBJs 501c3 laws were meant to bring the religious institutions under the government yolk. With enough activist judges to not rule mandatory 501c3 blanket status to Churches as unconstitutional, effectively the government would be able to tax Churches that didn't conform to their standards, making non-conformity a finable offense for all practical purposes.
That is the ground that Republicans need to take. Less government intervention; not a stance of the right kind of government intervention. Leave marriage in the Church, and then let married couples all get a civil union for tax, inheritance, and other legal benefits. It would essentially end the issue.
268![]() |
Karridine Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:21:45am |
re: #258 logboy
Thank YOU for your service, and Google "Not just another pretty face" sometime. He didn't want sympathy either, and that's GOOD!
:D
269![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:21:46am |
re: #261 MandyManners
Yes he was a philanderer and unrepentant skirt chaser, but he did not associate with old terrorists or attend churches that racists preached in for 20 years.
270![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:23:45am |
re: #257 middlecon
So without Republicans in the house and senate under Clinton there would have been a financial calamity and food shortages?
America has been through so much, one bad President is not enough to ruin this great country of ours.
You're mixing apples and oranges (Slick Willy vs Bozo). While Bozo is concerned with redistributing the wealth, Clinton was concerned with how he was going get into an intern's oval office. At least thats how I see it.
271![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:23:56am |
re: #258 logboy
I'm living proof uparmored doesn't necessarily mean shit.
I didn't mean that to be a sympathy post. I just wanted to confirm that uparmoring HUMVEES is pretty much a waste of time.
/it's a glorified jeep, doesn't belong in direct combat without heavy support
272![]() |
ibmkeyboard Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:23:57am |
re: #264 logboy
Sorry, EFP is Explosive Formed Penetrator. I'm too tired to be typing right now.
Please no sympathy posts, I'm really tired of hearing them. As my DS used to say, "If you want sympathy, its in the dictionary between shit and syphilis."
lol
My DI used to say: You want mama, You feel like crying?
Get down on your frigging faces and give me 100 push ups,
most of us were weeping when we got up.
273![]() |
Fearless Fred Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:23:58am |
re: #250 Sharmuta
Just because I think my political party should promote a religious agenda doesn't mean I'm looking down on religion.
And no- the government is not going to get smaller in the next four years. Where did I say that? I said that's what being a conservative means to me- smaller, less intrusive government. I realize this is touchy for some people, but we have to find some consensus here. Fiscal conservatives are pissed, and we're not going to win elections with republicans spending money like democrats. That's why we've been losing.
That line in the sand I mentioned before? This is my line. Fiscal restraint. If we cross it, we stand for nothing.
We can still stand for reducing this (below) in the world ... or for trying to eliminate it entirely. But isn't that a sort of a good type of moral busybodying? . . . Stoning victim 'begged for mercy'
274![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:24:04am |
re: #265 middlecon
Ok maybe Obama is a communist in his head...but do you really think he's going to govern as a Communist? Completely collectivize the state in 4 years? Is that his real plan?
The guy is straight out of the DNC playbook, he has no new ideas, he will do what he is told by the DNC. As far as I know they don't publicize their communist leanings.
He's the Weathermen Candidate, primarily. They're very Communist.
There's a TV show called "Prison Break." I don't really watch it but I've seen it on when others have been watching it. A powerful man made the statement to someone in the program, "We will rebuild America in our own image."
I called out, "IS HE CHANNELING OBAMBI?!?!?"
It sounded like Obambi, anyway.
275![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:25:10am |
re: #269 shanec99
Yes he was a philanderer and unrepentant skirt chaser, but he did not associate with old terrorists or attend churches that racists preached in for 20 years.
It's funny you bring it up. Some people completely fail to see how long time associations could shape someone's ideology and affect the way one would govern in a situation. I had someone putting words in my mouth last night, telling me "So what youre saying is that Obama is a terrorist", etc.
276![]() |
yochanan Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:25:17am |
re: #258 logboy
how is the hard wood going?
i noticed you were into wood work as well as lumberjack sports as I am very much into wood carving would love to see your work.
277![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:25:43am |
re: #261 MandyManners
Clinton was not a Communist.
Yeah, and he definitely was not a protectionist. He strongly defended and promoted free trade, at considerable political cost to himself, because he knew it was the best thing for our economy. The anti-globalization protests were SAVAGE during the Clinton administration, but he didn't give in to them.
In fact, I was absolutely furious at President Bush when, during the first few months of his administration, he slapped a tariff on steel imports, I think to help a Republican in PA win a Senate seat or the governorship or some such. What the fuck? It was such a blatant betrayal of conservative principles. Now, I've gained some respect for Bush since then, but it shocked me that he, a supposed conservative, would do such a thing.
278![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:25:56am |
re: #265 middlecon
Ok maybe Obama is a communist in his head...but do you really think he's going to govern as a Communist? Completely collectivize the state in 4 years? Is that his real plan?
The guy is straight out of the DNC playbook, he has no new ideas, he will do what he is told by the DNC. As far as I know they don't publicize their communist leanings.
Where in the world have you been for the past six months? CBBHO is all about pursuing policies that will weaken this nation.
279![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:26:29am |
re: #270 logboy
You're mixing apples and oranges (Slick Willy vs Bozo). While Bozo is concerned with redistributing the wealth, Clinton was concerned with how he was going get into an intern's oval office. At least thats how I see it.
Isn't that the oval orifice?
280![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:27:13am |
re: #269 shanec99
Yes he was a philanderer and unrepentant skirt chaser, but he did not associate with old terrorists or attend churches that racists preached in for 20 years.
It's pretty sad that I'm remembering his presidency with relative fondness.
281![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:27:28am |
re: #276 yochanan
how is the hard wood going?
i noticed you were into wood work as well as lumberjack sports as I am very much into wood carving would love to see your work.
I built all the furniture in my apartment before I left for Iraq. Hit me up another time on here and I'll show you photos.
282![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:27:53am |
re: #267 scion9
Abortion rates have dropped- all without any change in Roe. It polls consistently at 50-50 roughly. It's nothing but a divisive issue better left to states and that's where the republicans should leave it.
Frum was both right and wrong. I don't think the soc-cons cost us this election. It was fiscal conservatives- we're sick of the spending like drunken sailors. But Frum was right that the religious right hurts our case. When polled on issues, Americans come up right of center. We don't need to wave Bibles at them to get them to agree with us on more social minded issues, but waving a Bible at them is a good way to get a lot of them to tune us out completely.
283![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:28:00am |
re: #274 Adina in Judea
He's the Weathermen Candidate, primarily. They're very Communist.
There's a TV show called "Prison Break." I don't really watch it but I've seen it on when others have been watching it. A powerful man made the statement to someone in the program, "We will rebuild America in our own image."
I called out, "IS HE CHANNELING OBAMBI?!?!?"
It sounded like Obambi, anyway.
I think yes Obama believes in far left stuff, he's a liberal Democrat, however, I truly believe as I guess goes against the feelings of this board, that he's not going to govern as an actual Communist.
Call me naive.
He will another Jimmy Carter not Chairman Mao.
284![]() |
Karridine Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:28:20am |
re: #273 Fearless Fred
Well, of course, Fred! She was a raped 13-year old, so they HAD TO STONE HER TO DEATH!
/its Sharia, after all...
285![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:28:25am |
re: #271 Killian Bundy
I didn't mean that to be a sympathy post. I just wanted to confirm that uparmoring HUMVEES is pretty much a waste of time.
/it's a glorified jeep, doesn't belong in direct combat without heavy support
Listen guys uparmored hummers were not the perfect solution, but people should remember that in OIF I the hummers had canvass doors and thin plastic sheeting in the place of windows. Any kind of small arm could pass through the skin.
Up-armoured hummers were an interim attempt to address a problem until we could get a more acceptable solution.
Believe me, up armore saved lives, they were not perfect, but they were better than what we had before.
286![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:28:45am |
re: #280 MandyManners
re: #269 shanec99
Yes he was a philanderer and unrepentant skirt chaser, but he did not associate with old terrorists or attend churches that racists preached in for 20 years.
It's pretty sad that I'm remembering his presidency with relative fondness.
Yeah.
The prospects of Hillary in 2008 seem like a relatively fond memory now, too.
It's very sad.
287![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:28:57am |
re: #277 Tigger2005
Yeah, and he definitely was not a protectionist. He strongly defended and promoted free trade, at considerable political cost to himself, because he knew it was the best thing for our economy. The anti-globalization protests were SAVAGE during the Clinton administration, but he didn't give in to them.
In fact, I was absolutely furious at President Bush when, during the first few months of his administration, he slapped a tariff on steel imports, I think to help a Republican in PA win a Senate seat or the governorship or some such. What the fuck? It was such a blatant betrayal of conservative principles. Now, I've gained some respect for Bush since then, but it shocked me that he, a supposed conservative, would do such a thing.
What was Pres. Bush's rationale?
288![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:29:38am |
re: #278 MandyManners
Where in the world have you been for the past six months? CBBHO is all about pursuing policies that will weaken this nation.
I absolutely disagree with Obama's policies, I haven't seen any evidence he's going to govern as a communist, far left liberal absolutely. Communist, no.
289![]() |
I heart the USA Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:29:50am |
re: #232 middlecon
I'm just saying I'm not going to root for a President to fail based only on political differences. If Obama is the country's greatest President (extremely unlikely I know) I don't want to be pouting about political differences. I want to see him succeed not fail. Country first as John McCain would say.
What exactly do you want him to succeed at accomplishing, based on what his stated goals are? Higher taxes? Total disarmament? Fundamentally changing our country? What? I wish him TOTAL failure if he plans on following through with any of them. I fail to see how wanting him to succeed in destroying this nation is in any way putting "country first."
290![]() |
logboy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:29:51am |
re: #272 ibmkeyboard
Get down on your frigging faces and give me 100 push ups,
most of us were weeping when we got up.
On my last PT test I banged out 85 pushups in a little over a minute. I had almost a minute left to watch everyone else. Situps? Now thats another story.
291![]() |
Fenway_Nation Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:29:55am |
re: #273 Fearless Fred
Oh good....are these the same Somalis that have that Ukranian freighter full of Russian military hardware that they hijacked?
292![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:30:06am |
re: #273 Fearless Fred
We can still stand for reducing this (below) in the world ... or for trying to eliminate it entirely. But isn't that a sort of a good type of moral busybodying? . . . Stoning victim 'begged for mercy'
NO- I have the right to my morals so long as I'm not infringing on others. I want you and President Government and lefties and fundies and everyone to leave me alone!
294![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:30:41am |
re: #283 middlecon
I think yes Obama believes in far left stuff, he's a liberal Democrat, however, I truly believe as I guess goes against the feelings of this board, that he's not going to govern as an actual Communist.
Call me naive.
He will another Jimmy Carter not Chairman Mao.
I tend to agree, just because I like to be a bit optimistic sometimes, and I hope that we're all wrong here. Then again, another Jimmy Carter in an infinitely more pressing time could be DISASTROUS.
295![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:30:47am |
re: #283 middlecon
I think yes Obama believes in far left stuff, he's a liberal Democrat, however, I truly believe as I guess goes against the feelings of this board, that he's not going to govern as an actual Communist.
Obambi is so vain that he may spend most of the next four years getting people to fawn over him more than doing anything.
As disgusting as that would be - it would be preferable to doing communist stuff.
296![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:31:06am |
re: #264 logboy
Sorry, EFP is Explosive Formed Penetrator. I'm too tired to be typing right now.
/yep, shaped charge, very bad, and Iran is providing them while we watch it happen
298![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:31:20am |
re: #286 Adina in Judea
Yeah.
The prospects of Hillary in 2008 seem like a relatively fond memory now, too.
It's very sad.
I muttered that to my mom yesterday. But, would Clinton have been able to whip up the unemployed, inner-city voters?
299![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:31:34am |
re: #286 Adina in Judea
Yeah.
The prospects of Hillary in 2008 seem like a relatively fond memory now, too.
It's very sad.
It's all a matter of perspective. Anyone remember the Sean Hannity stop Hillary Express. Do you regret it now? LOL.
300![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:31:54am |
re: #282 Sharmuta
Abortion rates have dropped- all without any change in Roe. It polls consistently at 50-50 roughly. It's nothing but a divisive issue better left to states and that's where the republicans should leave it.
I couldn't agree more.
301![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:31:57am |
This is right on the money:
RedState: Karl Rove Has Been Vindicated
302![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:33:00am |
re: #297 Sharmuta
The problem with islam is the lack of individual rights.
I think that there is no concept of the individual at all in Islam. It's like Communism on blotter acid.
306![]() |
Karridine Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:33:56am |
re: #288 middlecon
I absolutely disagree with Obama's policies, I haven't seen any evidence he's going to govern as a communist, far left liberal absolutely. Communist, no.
So you think there is some kind of REAL DIFFERENCE between a 'far left liberal' and a 'Communist'?
Do tell...
308![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:33:59am |
re: #302 MandyManners
I think that there is no concept of the individual at all in Islam. It's like Communism on blotter acid.
That's a great analogy.
309![]() |
flutesnoot Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:34:09am |
Our current premier of Ontario, up hyah in Canada, vowed to put an end to coal-fired plants in the province by 2007, when he was campaigning in 2003. When he came into office, the government extended the deadline by two years, but recently pushed it back further to 2014.
During our recent election, the leader of the national green party, who is coincidentally as crazy as Cynthia McKinney, promised to not only close all coal plants, but also our nuclear plants. The green party, not surprisingly, came in dead last.
What the hell are these people smoking?
310![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:34:11am |
re: #300 littleoldlady
I couldn't agree more.
And that was Sen McCain's position, and see where it got him.
311![]() |
Rancher Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:34:40am |
We usually buy in bulk because cheap food, i.e. Wallmart and Sam's club, is a hundred miles away. Andrew Tobias, author of The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need, offers the following suggestions for saving money:
Buy in bulk. Join Sam's Club or Costco and buy mouthwash, toilet paper, tuna, and everything else you use regularly in bulk. Tobias figures if you lay out $1,000 a year for $1,400 worth of stuff, that's a 40% return on your money (tax free).
Charles Revson, the late cosmetics tycoon, bought his mouthwash by the case. ... he did better investment-wise than he ever did in the stock market.
313![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:35:07am |
re: #282 Sharmuta
Abortion rates have dropped- all without any change in Roe. It polls consistently at 50-50 roughly. It's nothing but a divisive issue better left to states and that's where the republicans should leave it.
So, abortion rates have dropped, and Republicans should adopt "Reproductive Rights" as part of their platform?
314![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:35:52am |
re: #289 I heart the USA
What exactly do you want him to succeed at accomplishing, based on what his stated goals are? Higher taxes? Total disarmament? Fundamentally changing our country? What? I wish him TOTAL failure if he plans on following through with any of them. I fail to see how wanting him to succeed in destroying this nation is in any way putting "country first."
Well I'm an American citizen and I want to see my country succeed, whether the President belongs to my political party or not. I'm totally against higher taxes but they will be the same as they were in the 90s, and less than they were in the 70s.
315![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:36:20am |
re: #310 shanec99
And that was Sen McCain's position, and see where it got him.
Do you think that's why he lost?
This was a referendum against Bush, voted upon by an uninformed electorate, made more so by an uninforming media.
316![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:36:56am |
re: #315 littleoldlady
Do you think that's why he lost?
This was a referendum against Bush, voted upon by an uninformed electorate, made more so by an uninforming media.
Part of his loss came from the economy
317![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:37:06am |
re: #310 shanec99
Please- do tell us how abortion was the decisive factor in the election.
You want to know why McCain lost? Fiscal conservatives hate him after the bailout. Soc-cons hate him for the gang of 14. He's a hard moderate. He has some good points, but I wasn't sold on him until the convention. I was pro-Sarah immediately.
318![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:37:35am |
re: #295 Adina in Judea
Obambi is so vain that he may spend most of the next four years getting people to fawn over him more than doing anything.
As disgusting as that would be - it would be preferable to doing communist stuff.
319![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:37:37am |
re: #306 Karridine
So you think there is some kind of REAL DIFFERENCE between a 'far left liberal' and a 'Communist'?
Do tell...
Are you serious here? Hmmm....well you have a communist administration in North Korea...not pretty.
Far left liberal you can look at places like Sweden/Norway....the 'perfect' kind of places that liberals like to point to.
320![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:38:18am |
re: #312 Sharmuta
You haven't been reading LGF, huh?
I've read LGF everyday for the last 6 months, at least. I just have independent opinions, right or wrong.
321![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:38:42am |
re: #283 middlecon
I think yes Obama believes in far left stuff, he's a liberal Democrat, however, I truly believe as I guess goes against the feelings of this board, that he's not going to govern as an actual Communist.
Call me naive.
He will another Jimmy Carter not Chairman Mao.
Yeah, he's going to govern as Jimmy Carter X2.
God, so many bad decisions for him to make, every day, any one of which can lead to disaster of one kind of another, collectively to a perfect shitstorm/nightmare. Raise taxes ... roll back NAFTA ... continue failed mortgage policies ... no offshore drilling or coal or nuclear power ... cut defense ... send signals of weakness and indecision to enemies and allies alike, encouraging arms races and adventurism ...
Oh, and another thing, I'm SICK of people blaming McCain's loss on McCain, Sarah, or their campaign. The blame falls squarely on the 52% of the American people who voted for Obama, and those Republicans and Independents who stayed home instead of voting McCain/Palin. McCain should have won even if he ran his campaign out of an ice cream truck. A large number of them clearly couldn't be bothered to find out the facts about the people running for office. They made a very dumb, impulsive choice, which they are going to regret forever.
322![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:38:58am |
re: #315 littleoldlady
This was a referendum against Bush, voted upon by an uninformed electorate, made more so by an uninforming media.
...and $600 million from who knows where.
Obambi didn't get it from the people who expect money from him now, that's for sure. There may be some dictators out there who have several hundred millions less in pocket change, though. We'll never know.
Kinda horrifying, isn't it?
323![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:39:29am |
re: #289 I heart the USA
What exactly do you want him to succeed at accomplishing, based on what his stated goals are? Higher taxes? Total disarmament? Fundamentally changing our country? What? I wish him TOTAL failure if he plans on following through with any of them. I fail to see how wanting him to succeed in destroying this nation is in any way putting "country first."
Can I have an AH-men.
324![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:39:48am |
re: #315 littleoldlady
Do you think that's why he lost?
This was a referendum against Bush, voted upon by an uninformed electorate, made more so by an uninforming media.
Absolutely. Coupled with the conclusions we came to that the reason Bush is hated is because of Florida in 2000 and sticking to his convictions no matter what, and there's your reasoning.
re: #316 shanec99
Part of his loss came from the economy
Yes, and the media and he himself failed on getting the clear message about who exactly was to blame for the economic situation.
325![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:40:07am |
re: #313 scion9
So, abortion rates have dropped, and Republicans should adopt "Reproductive Rights" as part of their platform?
WTF? Where did I say that? It's a state's right issue. Roe is bad judicial law. Do you know how many women don't know that? I have to explain it to them all the time. Overturning Roe would not make abortion illegal, yet it's used as a club to beat our party and keeps women away.
This issue is best handled by the states and the religious community.
328![]() |
yochanan Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:40:28am |
re: #292 Sharmuta
marriage should not be the govt bus. one way or the other.
why should a single person pay a different tax rate than a married person?
frankly in my view since marriage is most offen taken from religious values and each religion and sub groups within those different religions have different beliefs it really isn't the govt job to pick one religions ideas and make them state policy. For example the Jewish idea on devoice is totally different than the Christian idea what if Christians were forced to accept the idea of having to get a 'get' before they could remarry after a devoice? or another example the whole idea of polygamy which is supported by Islam, parts of the Mormon faith and even some safardic Jews.
i personally could careless if gays want to get married as long as i am not forced to accept it. and that is the rub.
329![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:40:56am |
re: #313 scion9
To elaborate, with the current social winds blowing in the direction of both liberals and conservatives coming out against abortion, at least to the degree that the democrats push it with abortion available on the due date, why wouldn't you pursue an issue that resonates currently with 50% of the population and growing?
330![]() |
middlecon Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:41:34am |
re: #326 Sharmuta
Do you click the links.....?
I read every post and most of the comments, that doesn't mean I have to agree with EVERY link/comment/etc.
331![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:41:54am |
re: #315 littleoldlady
Do you think that's why he lost?
This was a referendum against Bush, voted upon by an uninformed electorate, made more so by an adoring media.
p
Part of his loss came from the economy.
Part from the unhappiness with Republicans in general and the President in particular.
Part was because he was outspent in the media and the media's love fest with the President elect.
But a big part of it was the fact that the good Senator was too nice, he never really started to gain traction until Gov Palin came on board and started to fight and energize the base.
Compromising with a bully when you should be punching him in the mouth is a recipe for being bullied over and over again.
333![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:42:46am |
re: #317 Sharmuta
Please- do tell us how abortion was the decisive factor in the election.
You want to know why McCain lost? Fiscal conservatives hate him after the bailout. Soc-cons hate him for the gang of 14. He's a hard moderate. He has some good points, but I wasn't sold on him until the convention. I was pro-Sarah immediately.
I never said it did.
What I said was that was the good Senator's position and it did not help him.
Tell me how it helped him.
334![]() |
Karridine Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:42:51am |
re: #319 middlecon
We're together so far, but you seem to think that THE RESULTS of 30 years of Communist abuse being absent are proof of some difference between Communists there and liberal-left Communists here.
The intent, purpose, aims and methods of liberal-left-Communism have been demonstrated by Obama and his cohorts already. I assert that there IS NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE between Obama's stated intent and the intent of other Communist-socialists.
335![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:43:14am |
re: #285 shanec99
Listen guys uparmored hummers were not the perfect solution, but people should remember that in OIF I the hummers had canvass doors and thin plastic sheeting in the place of windows. Any kind of small arm could pass through the skin.
Up-armoured hummers were an interim attempt to address a problem until we could get a more acceptable solution.
Believe me, up armore saved lives, they were not perfect, but they were better than what we had before.
I realize that procurement moves slowly.
/but I'd venture to guess that an alarming percentage of our Iraq dead and wounded were caught riding HUMVEES
336![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:43:40am |
re: #329 scion9
So abortion is your line in the sand? Good luck with that.
337![]() |
ibmkeyboard Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:43:41am |
re: #290 logboy
On my last PT test I banged out 85 push ups in a little over a minute. I had almost a minute left to watch everyone else. Situps? Now that's another story.
Amazing!
I went into basic at 6 "1-1/2
181 pounds.
Came out of basic and first 3 months- 6 foot 3
210 pounds solid as a rock.
It must have been the good food,
Or my 18 year old body thought I was trying to kill it,
and it tried to put out sprouts.
my mother cried,
her little boy had become a monster. lol
/later, enjoyed the comments, thanks for your standing on that wall of freedom.
I am getting old and fat- need some more sleep. ha.
338![]() |
Fearless Fred Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:43:54am |
re: #292 Sharmuta
NO- I have the right to my morals so long as I'm not infringing on others. I want you and President Government and lefties and fundies and everyone to leave me alone!
But aren't we infringin' (as Saracuda might say) upon the Islamist's twisted moral lives? I thought we were. It felt good too.
339![]() |
Ledger1 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:44:19am |
Speaking of reading books...
Because the MSM is the propaganda link in the chain, I would suggest that Charles remove the CNN, ABC, cBS, NBC, WaPo, NYT, and AP from his left side bar list. It only feeds propaganda to his website customers.
Further, stated MSM outlets just irritate and insult his most of his members.
Sure it may bring a few cents per click but let’s get the enemy out the house.
I don't plan to watch CNN or any of the other MSM "news" outlets in the future.
Charles and others can monitor them and report to us. That is better than 24/7 flaming liberal blasts from those sites.
Btw, there is no TV in my house – it is just too much propaganda me and my family. We can get up to date sport news from various independent websites. I see no need to feed the MSM monster. I am happier without a TV.
340![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:44:37am |
re: #297 Sharmuta
The problem with islam is the lack of individual rights.
Those only come to a society after its been through an enlightenment, a la the West. To pretend honest-to-goodness human rights will appear anywhere in the Islamic world in the near future is misguided -- the have a few centuries of reform to go through first.
Human rights can only exist in a culture that is ready for them. If its not ready, then those rights are only a veneer -- a false front enforced by outside observers and international peer pressure.
341![]() |
Tamron Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:44:41am |
re: #172 Killian Bundy
Hey, look at the bright side, he starts getting fully classified briefings today.
/think they'll tell him about the space aliens?
Here's Obama's classified briefing, about space aliens. No kidding, almost...
Heh.
.
342![]() |
beblebrox Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:44:43am |
re: #302 MandyManners
I think that there is no concept of the individual at all in Islam. It's like Communism on blotter acid.
damn you Mandy! There goes yet another keyboard I have to clean coffee out of. :)
343![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:45:00am |
344![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:45:27am |
re: #317 Sharmuta
Please- do tell us how abortion was the decisive factor in the election.
You want to know why McCain lost? Fiscal conservatives hate him after the bailout. Soc-cons hate him for the gang of 14. He's a hard moderate. He has some good points, but I wasn't sold on him until the convention. I was pro-Sarah immediately.
None of these are even REMOTELY good reasons for letting Obama win. Hell, they're barely good enough reasons for letting Hillary win, but at least I could forgive them for that. I am so mad at the people who voted for Obama now, and those who stayed home rather than vote for McCain, I could take a bite out of a steel I-beam then bend it like a pretzel.
345![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:45:47am |
re: #340 stevieray
No- not human rights. Individual rights. There's a distinction. Ask buzzsawmonkey about it sometime.
346![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:47:10am |
re: #335 Killian Bundy
I realize that procurement moves slowly.
/but I'd venture to guess that an alarming percentage of our Iraq dead and wounded were caught riding HUMVEES
Agreed, no one who was over there will fight you on that point. I was there remember, I am a HMC, and in the 6 months I was there I put 84 people in body bags. IED were the cause of the overwhelming majority of the fatalities and injuries.
347![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:47:25am |
re: #344 Tigger2005
Hon- I voted McCain, it's just my analysis.
We will keep losing if we toss the fiscal conservatives under the bus and falsely think clinging to our Bibles is what defines us as conservatives.
348![]() |
littleoldlady Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:48:20am |
OhFerCryingOutLoud!
My horrorscope today: "Watch over your wealth..."
/bwahahahaha! WHAT WEALTH?!
349![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:49:11am |
re: #343 littleoldlady
Yeah, I've wondered myself if George Soros engineered the economy tanking.
He made such a big deal of trying to oust Bush in 2004, but he was almost totally silent this time. He knew he didn't help himself by telegraphing his plans in 2004.
I'd put him high on the list of those who helped Obambi buy the White House for $600 million.
350![]() |
stevieray Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:49:34am |
re: #345 Sharmuta
No- not human rights. Individual rights. There's a distinction. Ask buzzsawmonkey about it sometime.
I know all about buzzsaw's position and I agree with it. I was just sloppy in my writing -- insert "individual rights" in the appropriate places.
351![]() |
RTLM Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:50:34am |
I personally, am very happy about the YES vote on prop 8
352![]() |
Karridine Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:50:40am |
My youngling is clamoring for CPU time, and I have an Ouroboros starting its undulating, coruscating crawl through my visual field, so I'll BBIAW...
y'all
353![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:52:41am |
re: #344 Tigger2005
I am so mad at the people who voted for Obama now, and those who stayed home rather than vote for McCain, I could take a bite out of a steel I-beam then bend it like a pretzel.
I liked the small business employer who explained a couple of weeks ago on the internet that he would have to lay off six people if Obamba were elected due to the higher taxes, etc.
So he went out to the parking lot to find the employee cars with Obama stickers on them. They are the ones he is planning to lay off.
I'm mad, too, but the Obama voters and the non-voters are going to suffer, too.
Obama will blame Bush so they may never know what they did.
We know.
354![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:52:46am |
re: #342 beblebrox
damn you Mandy! There goes yet another keyboard I have to clean coffee out of. :)
Sugar and cream?
355![]() |
laZardo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:53:25am |
So I'm back from college and I'd still like a good reason not to abandon the sinking ship.
356![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:53:57am |
re: #355 laZardo
So I'm back from college and I'd still like a good reason not to abandon the sinking ship.
We need all the sane people we can get.
357![]() |
Killian Bundy Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:54:32am |
re: #346 shanec99
It's just things like
while leading a convoy through Baghdad
/that bother me, it like sending troops into the Hürtgen Forest
358![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:55:02am |
re: #355 laZardo
So I'm back from college and I'd still like a good reason not to abandon the sinking ship.
Well if you abandon the ship rather than patch the hole and bail the water out you will end up in an ocean filled with blood and hunger sharks.
Good enough reason for you?
359![]() |
I heart the USA Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:55:37am |
re: #314 middlecon
Well I'm an American citizen and I want to see my country succeed, whether the President belongs to my political party or not. I'm totally against higher taxes but they will be the same as they were in the 90s, and less than they were in the 70s.
I didn't question your desire to see our country succeed. All of us here want our country to succeed. I'm asking you which of Obama's goals will you describe as 'success' for our country should they be realized?
360![]() |
laZardo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:55:41am |
re: #356 MandyManners
Good luck with that. I spent nine days in a mental asylum sedated and medicated back in 2005 for a nervous breakdown that got the Sacramento PD hauling me out of my house in cuffs.
361![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 2:56:22am |
re: #325 Sharmuta
WTF? Where did I say that? It's a state's right issue. Roe is bad judicial law. Do you know how many women don't know that? I have to explain it to them all the time. Overturning Roe would not make abortion illegal, yet it's used as a club to beat our party and keeps women away.
This issue is best handled by the states and the religious community.
How is it bad judicial law? Abortion is a Civil Right according to the SCOTUS. That is the battle. Is it, or is it not a Civil Right. You are saying that it was a bad ruling, which means that you don't believe that people have a Right to have abortions. That States should be able to legislate such, including outlawing abortion on a State by State level if they so choose. You are still talking about outlawing abortion.
According to polls nearly 70% of Barack Obama supporters don't believe that Justices should make decisions based on a construction of the law, but their own moral compass. Who exactly are you going to convince en masse with such an argument? We have a sitting Justice now that is on the record saying that given the opportunity, she will rule based on her personal opinions rather than on the law.
Even Alito said he wouldn't overturn Roe, due to the judicial standard of not overturning longstanding precedents, especially ones that have been reaffirmed multiple times.
362![]() |
laZardo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:00:12am |
re: #358 shanec99
Not really. I think I can still manage to get one of the life rafts.
363![]() |
shiplord kirel Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:02:50am |
It was like a Paris banlieu in Lubbock Thursday night, with windows shot out of 130 vehicles in the southwest part of the town.
No media have had the guts to suggest that this was connected to the election but it started just after midnight, most of the vehicles hit were SUVs, and the area is solidly middle-class, white or Hispanic, and Republican.
364![]() |
srb1976 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:03:53am |
re: #277 Tigger2005
Yeah, and he definitely was not a protectionist. He strongly defended and promoted free trade, at considerable political cost to himself, because he knew it was the best thing for our economy. The anti-globalization protests were SAVAGE during the Clinton administration, but he didn't give in to them.
In fact, I was absolutely furious at President Bush when, during the first few months of his administration, he slapped a tariff on steel imports, I think to help a Republican in PA win a Senate seat or the governorship or some such. What the fuck? It was such a blatant betrayal of conservative principles. Now, I've gained some respect for Bush since then, but it shocked me that he, a supposed conservative, would do such a thing.
As some one who works in the steel industry (suprise, american manufacturing is not QUITE dead)
My understanding was that the tariff was a temp measure to combat dumping and currency maipulation being played by mostly chinese steel companies, many of whom were running at a loss and being subsidized by their government.
I know the conversation has probably passed this topic by, but wanted to add that 2 cents
365![]() |
laZardo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:04:08am |
re: #363 shiplord kirel
The "overzealous celebrations" have started.
/because you can't call them "riots" because that's RACSIT.
366![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:05:34am |
re: #361 scion9
We're not going to stop abortion through the courts or laws. It's a social issue, to be sure. It's not a winning political issue. The most swing I think you'll ever see in polling is 5%.
You stop abortions by stopping unplanned pregnancy. You make adoption easier. You teach kids about abstinence in context- economical impact of out of wedlock children and the poverty that comes with it for most youth.
I don't believe the problem is changed with a constitutional amendment, and clinging to that plank in the platform, while moral, is not a winning issue. It would never pass Congress' super majority nor the super majority needed to pass the states in order to become a amendment to the Constitution.
367![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:06:42am |
re: #336 Sharmuta
So abortion is your line in the sand? Good luck with that.
So, what do you think the chances are for a GOP candidate that thinks abortion is a Civil Right to get nominated to run for POTUS, or any other high office anywhere but in very blue states, versus another candidate that took the opposing viewpoint?
What is your solution? Change the electorate? The electorate decides the platform based on who they elect. The party doesn't choose who votes for it based on their platform. Without changing the prevailing opinions of people that already vote GOP, the base. Essentially you need to be advocating that a bunch of pro-choice candidates run as pro-life, and then alienate the people that elected them in order to change the party platform.
Good luck with that. It is just too big of an issue. More importantly, it isn't even something that can be changed because of Roe v. Wade, so it is just a GOP boogeyman, and it appears to be winning them more votes than it is losing them, especially versus people like Obama who are absolute hardline pro-abortion.
368![]() |
TheMatrix31 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:07:21am |
Heh....F&F mentions RFK-Jr as a possibility for head of EPA.
Unbelievable. Our next President had deep roots with someone who was a vehement anti-American, and dedicated his book to the guy who murdered the father of a possible Cabinet department head.
369![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:09:18am |
re: #368 TheMatrix31
Heh....F&F mentions RFK-Jr as a possibility for head of EPA.
Unbelievable. Our next President had deep roots with someone who was a vehement anti-American, and dedicated his book to the guy who murdered the father of a possible Cabinet department head.
The MSM should ask RFK-Jr about this sometime, but you know they won't.
370![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:10:01am |
re: #347 Sharmuta
Hon- I voted McCain, it's just my analysis.
I know that. I agree with you. The soccon's priorities are insane. When someone says, "Abortion is the only issue for me," I just don't know what to say. Keeping America safe and prosperous and free should be the most important issues for every conservative. Without those things, nobody's going to have the luxury of worrying about any soccon issue.
A lot of soccons seem to think that their moral issues are related to the safety and prosperity and freedom issues ... they think God will take these things away from us to punish us for our immorality. Oh, please. America is not fundamentally more immoral now than it was in the past. We may be less moral in some ways, but we are more moral in others. And we are certainly far more moral than Islamic countries, which ban abortion and homosexuality and teach creationism.
371![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:10:09am |
re: #366 Sharmuta
No, an amendment is not likely to happen, and Roe is not going to be overturned. However, that doesn't mean that it can't be used to win votes. Democrats do it all the time. It is basically all they are. They are all identity politics, and wedge issues, and they do absolutely nothing about them while in office. The vast majority of their crap is pie in the sky nonsense that isn't even capable of being legislated at all, but they still get elected on it.
372![]() |
tappin52 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:10:47am |
re: #313 scion9
So, abortion rates have dropped, and Republicans should adopt "Reproductive Rights" as part of their platform?
She didn't suggest adopting reproductive rights into the platform. She made an astute observation that the abortion issue is not going to gain the republicans any ground politically. That fight has already been fought and the divisions are not able to be closed. And I concur.
373![]() |
Tamron Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:11:37am |
re: #340 stevieray
Human rights can only exist in a culture that is ready for them. If its not ready, then those rights are only a veneer -- a false front enforced by outside observers and international peer pressure.
True. --And it's a tragedy that there are barbaric, illiterate cultures, as well as private individuals, who appear to be doing their best to reverse the trend of civilization. Which, by definition, puts them below the level of 'humanity' as we know it, because to the degree that they aren't ready for (and are actively destroying) human rights, then to that degree they are also subhuman, deserving little or no rights themselves.
This is not a trivial problem for mankind, especially with the advent of nuclear proliferation in the hands of the above.
Imagine sharks in a swimming pool, demanding the protection of human rights just like all the other swimmers.
.
374![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:11:50am |
re: #367 scion9
The electorate decides the platform based on who they elect.
Uh- that's not how the platform works. The platform is worked on by members of the party then voted on by delegates to the convention- usually other people who work within the party.
And I'm done discussing this with you.
375![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:12:17am |
re: #362 laZardo
Not really. I think I can still manage to get one of the life rafts.
Well you might find that when a ship is sinking if Sailors stick together and patch the holes, pump the water (the Navy calls it damage control) they usually can do better than if they jump into a life raft and hope that someone will come and rescue you.
It's what we Republicans believe in. Work together to achieve an end, don't wait on somebody to save you.
377![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:14:27am |
re: #360 laZardo
Good luck with that. I spent nine days in a mental asylum sedated and medicated back in 2005 for a nervous breakdown that got the Sacramento PD hauling me out of my house in cuffs.
Well, sometimes shit just snaps.
378![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:14:31am |
re: #372 tappin52
She didn't suggest adopting reproductive rights into the platform. She made an astute observation that the abortion issue is not going to gain the republicans any ground politically. That fight has already been fought and the divisions are not able to be closed. And I concur.
Why won't the issue gain any ground politically? As in garner votes. Is it that more people now than ever are pro-life, as a percentage of the electorate? That just doesn't make any sense.
379![]() |
jim in virginia Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:15:20am |
Morning all.
Fox and friends defending Sarah Palin. Doocy: McCain staffers are looking for jobs and need a reason McCain lost
380![]() |
scion9 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:16:40am |
re: #374 Sharmuta
Delegates are still beholden to the electorate. The process isn't exactly entirely undemocratic.
381![]() |
BlueCanuck Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:16:46am |
382![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:17:17am |
re: #378 scion9
Why won't the issue gain any ground politically? As in garner votes. Is it that more people now than ever are pro-life, as a percentage of the electorate? That just doesn't make any sense.
Even if it does not gain us ground, I am willing to fight the abortion fight day after day to defend the unborn.
I stand on principle on this matter, and would rather lose on this principle rather than win and ignore the plight of the unborn. If we are unwilling to defend the weak and defenseless because it does not give us a political advantage then we may as well become Democrats.
383![]() |
Adina in Judea Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:17:30am |
re: #379 jim in virginia
Fox and friends defending Sarah Palin.
A friend of mine wrote Fox & Friends a scathing email last night about the Sarah Palin smears on Fox. She probably wasn't the only one who did this.
386![]() |
Tigger2005 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:18:08am |
I think that letter's been proven to be a fake, but I like the idea.
After I mentioned it on here a couple weeks ago, somebody said he didn't like it. Said it sounded very un-American and the firings should be based on performance, nothing else.
I disagree. Assuming the story is true, these firings would be made necessary solely because of Obama's tax increases. Why should people who didn't vote for Obama suffer because of his tax increases? They will anyway, of course, but I see no reason for the blow to fall evenly.
re: #353 Adina in Judea
I liked the small business employer who explained a couple of weeks ago on the internet that he would have to lay off six people if Obamba were elected due to the higher taxes, etc.
So he went out to the parking lot to find the employee cars with Obama stickers on them. They are the ones he is planning to lay off.
I'm mad, too, but the Obama voters and the non-voters are going to suffer, too.
Obama will blame Bush so they may never know what they did.
We know.
387![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:18:13am |
re: #363 shiplord kirel
It was like a Paris banlieu in Lubbock Thursday night, with windows shot out of 130 vehicles in the southwest part of the town.
No media have had the guts to suggest that this was connected to the election but it started just after midnight, most of the vehicles hit were SUVs, and the area is solidly middle-class, white or Hispanic, and Republican.
BB guns?
388![]() |
shanec99 Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:18:55am |
389![]() |
laZardo Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:19:12am |
re: #375 shanec99
The people who voted Obama into office with a landslide weren't exactly waiting either. A few of them have outright told me he isn't exactly "the Messiah" but expect him to work with the people more to try to fix the holes in the economy, etc.
390![]() |
Sharmuta Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:19:25am |
re: #382 shanec99
You are talking about a battle for hearts and minds that will only be won outside of politics. The reason minds are changing is because of the work NGOs have done not Washington.
391![]() |
MandyManners Thu, Nov 6, 2008 3:20:06am |
