And Now the Leaking Starts

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Politics • Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 1:33 pm PST • Views: 229

One thing we have to look forward to: the Obama administration will probably be the leakiest White House in history.

Just hours after President Bush and President-elect Obama met in the Oval Office of the White House, details of their confidential conversation began leaking out to the press, igniting anger from the president, sources claim.

“Senator Obama would be wise to keep close counsel,” a top Bush source warned.

Advertisement

386 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Bloodnok  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:33:59pm

Novice

2 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:34:00pm

0bama will keep close counsel. But here he was talking to Republican, so it didn't count.

3 MrSilverDragon  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:34:16pm

Loose lips sink ships, Obama... remember that.

4 unreconstructed rebel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:34:53pm

C'mon, People. What the hell did you expect?

5 lawhawk  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:35:52pm

Leaks? Those aren't going to be leaks.

Those are verified data distributions by other means. They're information releases by less than proximate sources. /

6 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:36:16pm

This really aggravated me, Bush entrusts in O and then O turns around and tries to make Bush look bad, or more likely tries to make himself look good - presidential and all. What a zero

7 joncelli  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:36:24pm

Reporters will love the O admin. Buy the right person two, maybe three drinks and they can out all the classified programs they want.

8 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:37:58pm

May I be the first to suggest a new Obama nickname?

The Sieve.

9 WrathofG-d  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:38:19pm

Freedom of Speeech!
/

10 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:38:20pm

Spreading the info around.

According to their needs, of course.

11 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:38:34pm

Calling Joe the Plumber, looks like Obama is gonna need you!
/

12 unreconstructed rebel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:38:50pm

re: #7 joncelli

Reporters will love the O admin. Buy the right person two, maybe three drinks and they can out all the classified programs they want.

Wrong recreational pharmaceutical, but yeah.

13 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:39:24pm

It's gonna be a LONG 4 years.

14 Nevergiveup  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:39:38pm

Before we all get giddy about the perceived leaks that are coming, remember they were able to deep six that Khalidi tape with the LA Times when they had to?

15 Ojoe  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:40:00pm

This is a really bad sign.

I want to believe the best because I love my country,

but I think we have elected a bozo.

16 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:40:09pm

re: #7 joncelli

Reporters will love the O admin. Buy the right person two, maybe three drinks and they can out all the classified programs they want.

The loyal press will never spill state secrets.
/

17 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:40:36pm

re: #14 Nevergiveup

Before we all get giddy about the perceived leaks that are coming, remember they were able to deep six that Khalidi tape with the LA Times when they had to?

So if is about protecting his butt, we're good.

Protecting the US of A? Who knows?

18 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:40:48pm

re: #15 Ojoe

This is a really bad sign.

I want to believe the best because I love my country,

but I think we have elected a bozo.

You mean BOzo.

19 docremulac  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:04pm

Obama's grasping on to the last chance to validate his job by bashing Bush.

Enjoy it while you can Obama, when Bush is gone it's just you against the world and all it's problems and guess how many of those problems you're going to be able to solve by bashing Bush? Zero.

20 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:10pm

And we can also trust the O administration to keep classified intelligence information from being leaked? Holy shit, they're going to end up telegraphing every impending US offense / defense move to the enemy.

21 Noam Chumpski  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:14pm

Somehow I read that as 'Obama's Presidency will piss all over us.'

Either way... good headline.

22 abolitionist  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:20pm

Such a compromise with Pres. Bush would compromise an even bigger bailout plan for the auto industry, I suppose.

23 karmic_inquisitor  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:23pm

Wait till the factions start covering their asses when things don't go to plan.

it will be ugly.

One problem that Dems face is that they don't have ideas other than vague platitudes. So there is little in the way of a message (other than Hope and Change) to enforce discipline around.

24 eschew_obfuscation  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:42pm

I suspect that 'leaks' will be the method of choice for the Obama presidency for purposes of floating trial balloons for gauging the public response.

"Let's see...I wonder how gun control will go over?...Let's leak a rumor that we're going to make serialized ammunition and exorbitant tax on ammunition part of our campaign to keep kid's safe (in addition to mandatory gun locks in the home). We can always adjust when the pitch forks and torches show up on the front lawn".

25 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:52pm

re: #8 Silhouette

That a good one, might get traction.

26 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:41:57pm

re: #19 docremulac

Eh, they practically blamed WWII on Dubya, so they can certainly blame the next 20-40 years on him.

27 SFGoth  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:42:19pm

What are the odds he has a nervous breakdown at some point? Going from leftie constitutional law lecturer to com. organizer to abstaining state senator to U.S. Senate backbencher might qualify you for the model U.N. club, but I think he's going to be compared to Dan Quayle re: deer in the headlights look.

28 midwestgak  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:42:22pm

re: #6 turn

This really aggravated me, Bush entrusts in O and then O turns around and tries to make Bush look bad, or more likely tries to make himself look good - presidential and all. What a zero

Ya, if the car bail out doesn't happen during this lame duck administration . . . it will be the first thing the OB will do.

What a tool.

29 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:42:29pm

This is obvious disinformation. What they really discussed was how they will divide the world up between them, with the usual cut for the International Zionist Conspirators. Just ask David Duke and Alex Jones.

30 GeeWiz  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:42:32pm

re: #15 Ojoe

This is a really bad sign.

I want to believe the best because I love my country,

but I think we have elected a bozo.

Not a bozo but a shrewd Chicago political machinist.

31 Wilderstad  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:43:14pm

Oh boy! Just think the fun with Obama is just beginning.
Heaven preserve the U.S.A because Obama looks to be trying to dismantle it.

32 Max Darkside  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:43:21pm

"Profesionalism? Propheshunalism?! We don't need no stinking profeshunalizm!"

33 gop_patriot  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:43:26pm

I saw this earlier- it's just pathetic that the folks who are still running Obama's "campaign" are such mental teenagers. They're like a bunch of gossipy brats, always playing games and looking for new angles.

Well guess what, morons, this is the entire country you're playing with now. And people are going to get tired of this kind of crap quickly.

Too many people voted for the big zero without understanding Chicago politics and without understanding the way that democrats/socialists/leftists work. It's like Code Pink on a huge scale, but without the ridiculous feather boas and hats.
/usually

Barf.

34 Ojoe  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:43:47pm

re: #18 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

BOzo

ROFLMAO

35 WrathofG-d  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:43:55pm

re: #14 Nevergiveup

In addition, the fact that the "biggest stories" get forgotten soon enough, doesn't really help anything when you are striving for truth., The LA times knew that those that wanted the tape have no leg to stand on, and would move on if they just waited them out.

36 midwestgak  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:44:01pm

re: #15 Ojoe

This is a really bad sign.

I want to believe the best because I love my country,

but I think we have elected a bozo.

we white man? (and there is no more racism so I can say that)

37 eschew_obfuscation  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:44:06pm

re: #24 eschew_obfuscation

I suspect that 'leaks' will be the method of choice for the Obama presidency for purposes of floating trial balloons for gauging the public response.

"Let's see...I wonder how gun control will go over?...Let's leak a rumor that we're going to make serialized ammunition and exorbitant tax on ammunition part of our campaign to keep kid's safe (in addition to mandatory gun locks in the home). We can always adjust when the pitch forks and torches show up on the front lawn".

And when they call us on it, we can deny that any of that was ever a part of our program.

38 joncelli  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:44:08pm

re: #24 eschew_obfuscation

And the assault weapons ban will return within a few months.

39 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:44:10pm

re: #24 eschew_obfuscation

I suspect that 'leaks' will be the method of choice for the Obama presidency for purposes of floating trial balloons for gauging the public response.

"Let's see...I wonder how gun control will go over?...Let's leak a rumor that we're going to make serialized ammunition and exorbitant tax on ammunition part of our campaign to keep kid's safe (in addition to mandatory gun locks in the home). We can always adjust when the pitch forks and torches show up on the front lawn".

That's what focus groups are for. Maybe they can bring in Luntz's Dunces™, since he's not busy anymore, and let them spin their stupid dials to decide policy.

40 kenprice  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:44:19pm

If true (and I'm not certain, yet) this is gross stupidity. Someone in the Obama entourage appears to be trying to make "brownie points" with the Press. No government can operate with everything they discuss being public knowledge before any decision can be made. Worse, there is no way to know what's true, and what's someones leaking to force a decision. Obama may find himself losing control of his administration before he ever unpacks his bags at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

41 iowavette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:45:24pm

Here I was feeling somewhat queasy thinking especially poor thoughts in BO's general direction even while he's acting particularly civilized with the Bush's. I should have known he wouldn't let me down. Suspect this cabinet will make Clinton's look like pikers. I can't wait.

42 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:45:26pm

re: #40 kenprice

No government can operate with everything they discuss being public knowledge before any decision can be made. Worse, there is no way to know what's true, and what's someones leaking to force a decision.

If that's the case, keep operating this way, 0bama!
;)

43 cwnorma  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:45:52pm

The confidence other world leaders will hold with Mr Obama will be inversely proportional to the number of leaks.

Credibility, Mr President.

44 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:46:20pm

re: #33 gop_patriot

I saw this earlier- it's just pathetic that the folks who are still running Obama's "campaign" are such mental teenagers. They're like a bunch of gossipy brats, always playing games and looking for new angles.

They are still very afraid of Palin because the media attack is still going.

I just watch Matt Lauer interview her and as she is reciting a long list of thoughtful reasons that she and McCain lost, the summary caption at the bottom reads: "Palin was surprised by election."

45 jamgarr  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:46:32pm

I disagree. The wrath of Rahm will descend on anyone guilty of leaking. Count on it.

46 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:46:44pm

re: #43 cwnorma

The confidence other world leaders will hold with Mr Obama will be inversely proportional to the number of leaks.

Credibility, Mr President.

Now, now. You've got to remember that he doesn't even begin his on-the-job training until January 20th.

47 spidly  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:46:44pm

they be leaky for a couple of months. then, you won't know what the hell they're up to.

anybody gotta remedy for raw lungs? guhhh. 3 day nyquil bender and associated hangover.

48 vxbush  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:46:47pm

Again, the fact that Obama has not had to work at an administrative position in a state government is showing itself. Someone at a governor's level would already understand the value of keeping one's mouth closed.

49 Nevergiveup  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:46:53pm

re: #35 WrathofG-d

In addition, the fact that the "biggest stories" get forgotten soon enough, doesn't really help anything when you are striving for truth., The LA times knew that those that wanted the tape have no leg to stand on, and would move on if they just waited them out.

And we should not underestimate these people. First of all they BEAT us. Oh I Know McCain sure didn't help, but still. Obama has some of those ruff tough Chicago thugs around him and also some of the nastiest ex-clinton people. We are in for the fight of our life I think. And we all know how high the stakes are.

50 Cognito  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:46:58pm

Well. Those leaks are dishonorable and, maybe worse in a way, they're impractical. Guess what happens when you betray the confidence of the people who speak with you? They stop being the people who speak with you.

Good move for a president.

51 Xango Annie  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:47:11pm

I am really starting to dislike this little, little "man" or squirrel as Rush calls him...on a cosmetic note..we are going to see this little twerp turn gray overnite...if he stays away from the color corrector...

52 Jack Reacher  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:47:13pm

re: #33 gop_patriot

Bingo. The probably wore out their copy of the "War Room" documentary about Clinton's 1992 campaign, not to mention their "West Wing" boxed set. It's not all angles, zero-sum campaigning, gotchas, and spinning. A president and a Congress have to actually govern. But that will be hard to explain to kids who are busy removing the W keys from White House computers.

53 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:47:15pm

Rush read a CNN poll on Obama saying that 74% of the American people approved of what Obama's done so far. WTF? What HAS he done? I sometimes feel we're sunk.

54 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:47:15pm

No WONDER he hated Joe the Plumber!

He's O the Leaker!

55 CapeCoddah  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:47:23pm

re: #3 MrSilverDragon

Loose lips sink ships, Obama... remember that.

O is the one who has those ships in the cross hairs. That is one of his stated missions.

56 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:47:43pm

re: #19 docremulac

Obama's grasping on to the last chance to validate his job by bashing Bush.

Enjoy it while you can Obama, when Bush is gone it's just you against the world and all it's problems and guess how many of those problems you're going to be able to solve by bashing Bush? Zero.

You're right however I would wager this won't stop them from bashing Bush, if the MSM repeats it time and time again the left will really associate O problems with Bush. I think it's called projection, oh yeah -

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

57 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:47:58pm
58 GeeWiz  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:48:49pm

re: #40 kenprice

Worse, there is no way to know what's true, and what's someones leaking to force a decision.

Witness the leaks about Sarah Palin from members of the McCain campaign.

59 Buck  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:48:56pm

If it is true, and Bush was trying to make a deal, then Bush was being an idiot.

You don't do a horse trade with a man who does not own a horse.

Obama does not control the democrats, they control him.

That much I am sure of. And who owns the democrats? The far left, Moveon, codepink, and yes even Kos to a lesser degree.

60 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:49:35pm

re: #45 jamgarr

I disagree. The wrath of Rahm will descend on anyone guilty of leaking. Count on it.

Most "leakers" do so anonymously.

61 CIA Reject  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:49:52pm

It is only a matter of time before this nonsense starts burning intelligence sources, compromising operations, and killing people who truly love this country.

All so that those who do not love this country can remain in power.

*SPIT*

62 PAgirlinNC  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:49:52pm

This is a really bad sign.

I want to believe the best because I love my country,

but I think weTHEY have elected a bozo.


That's how I figure it... I didn't vote for the idiot. (Wow. Did I just channel a moonbat talking about Bush?) Scary.

63 ssn697  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:49:53pm

Obama's campaign was very light on leaks. I'm not buying the "leakiest ever" stuff.

64 jamgarr  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:50:14pm

re: #60 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Most "leakers" do so anonymously.


And the sugar plum fairey farts rainbows.

65 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:50:43pm

re: #53 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Rush read a CNN poll on Obama saying that 74% of the American people approved of what Obama's done so far. WTF? What HAS he done? I sometimes feel we're sunk.

If what he's done includes staying out of the Senate chamber, I approve.

66 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:50:51pm
67 3 wood  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:50:57pm

re: #16 Who Watches the Watchmen?

The loyal press will never spill state secrets.
/

Even with your slash sign I sprayed diet coke on the screen at that one.

I truly believe that there as an informal badge on honor among the MSM to see who can spill what state secrets fastest. Extra points if they manage to get someones life (not their's of course) endangered in the process.

68 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:51:24pm

re: #45 jamgarr

I disagree. The wrath of Rahm will descend on anyone guilty of leaking. Count on it.

You beat me to it. I agree with you, and I think that this is partly why Obama chose Emmanuel: to impose discipline and order and be the hatchet man.

69 unreconstructed rebel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:51:37pm

re: #20 turn

And we can also trust the O administration to keep classified intelligence information from being leaked? Holy shit, they're going to end up telegraphing every impending US offense / defense move to the enemy.

I am told that the TLA agencies & the Pentagon had very serious problems with Bubba. They will probably be very careful with Zero.

(Now, why couldn't the Secret Service use "Zero"?)

70 Ojoe  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:51:42pm

re: #62 PAgirlinNC

Well I was speaking of the country as a whole; I did not vote for Obama.

"We" in the sense that Obama is the President of the whole country, which I hope he really realizes.

71 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:51:44pm

re: #53 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Rush read a CNN poll on Obama saying that 74% of the American people approved of what Obama's done so far. WTF? What HAS he done? I sometimes feel we're sunk.

He's done nothing. Why do you think so many approve?

72 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:51:49pm
73 calcajun  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:52:05pm

Oh, they're just so CUTE when they're that age. Those kids will say the dangdest things.

74 gop_patriot  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:52:15pm

re: #44 Silhouette

Unbelievable.

75 spidly  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:52:21pm

re: #65 Who Watches the Watchmen?

If what he's done includes staying out of the Senate chamber, I approve.

they approve of the promises to fill tanks, pay mortgages, and heal the world.

76 Buck  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:52:32pm

re: #66 Izzy Dunne

Bush should have withheld any contact, until O'bama produces a genuine birth certificate.
And frikkin' ANNOUNCE it, too.

Please don't go there, not even as a joke. That was the stupidest rumor.

77 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:52:40pm

re: #63 ssn697

Obama's campaign was very light on leaks. I'm not buying the "leakiest ever" stuff.

Key word: campaign.

When it was their agenda on the line, I agree they don't leak when they don't want to.

78 JimInMN  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:53:05pm

That is not the leak I knew

79 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:53:06pm

Question: were Obama'a aides there at the meeting with Bush, or was it just the two of them? If no one else was there, that means that Obama himself did the leaking, doesn't it?

80 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:53:21pm

re: #28 midwestgak

Ya, if the car bail out doesn't happen during this lame duck administration . . . it will be the first thing the OB will do.

What a tool.

Everybody is getting in on this $700 bil handout. I read where Amex was turned into a bank overnight so they can cash in. Imagine when O and the dem congress gets to call the shots on where this money is spent, we really will have huge government bureaucracies spring up, essentially putting people to work for the government O at the taxpayer's expense.

81 3 wood  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:53:32pm

re: #20 turn

And we can also trust the O administration to keep classified intelligence information from being leaked? Holy shit, they're going to end up telegraphing every impending US offense / defense move to the enemy.

Yep. and Uncle Joe told you it would cause a major challenge by foreign powers within 6 months.


Ask yourself, if you were a terrorist, would Obama in the White House make you hesitate to strike?

82 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:54:06pm

re: #80 turn

I read where Amex was turned into a bank overnight so they can cash in.

Isn't LGF a bank? I'm pretty sure we are.

83 Tappin52  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:54:08pm

re: #31 Wilderstad

Oh boy! Just think the fun with Obama is just beginning.
Heaven preserve the U.S.A because Obama looks to be trying to dismantle it.

If he dismantles the USA, he dismantles his own gravy train. Obviously, I'm missing something here.

84 PAgirlinNC  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:54:28pm

re: #70 Ojoe

I know. It's just really sad to think that there are 56 million idiots in this country... I mean, I knew they were out there but - that many?

85 GeeWiz  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:54:33pm

re: #79 Amy

If no one else was there, that means that Obama himself did the leaking, doesn't it?

Correctomundo!

86 pat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:54:34pm

I agree. Too many egos. Too many second raters.

87 Peter Verkooijen  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:54:42pm

It won't be leaky when it doesn't suit Obama. He just dissing Bush here and rewarding his friends at the NYT etc.

88 Nevergiveup  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:54:47pm

GM shares hit 65-year low amid liquidity concerns

[Link: www.reuters.com...]

Hey, how are them there warranties feeling about now?

89 eschew_obfuscation  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:55:00pm

re: #82 Silhouette

Isn't LGF a bank? I'm pretty sure we are.

Why, yes...yes we are!

My window will be open shortly for your deposits ;-)

90 Cognito  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:55:04pm

re: #67 3 wood

Even with your slash sign I sprayed diet coke on the screen at that one.

I truly believe that there as an informal badge on honor among the MSM to see who can spill what state secrets fastest. Extra points if they manage to get someones life (not their's of course) endangered in the process.

How did you know?

Just the other day I was speaking with someone, bragging about some state secrets I'd spilled, and he said, "But did you endanger someone?" And I had to admit I hadn't. So back to the grindstone.

Oh, by the way: They're called 'state secrets' for a reason. Perhaps you should examine the state's role in keeping its collective mouth shut.

91 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:55:07pm

Ruh-roh.

Via the Jawa Report, they don't much like The One in Manila these days...

In the first blush of victory, US President-elect Barack Obama accepted congratulations from nine presidents and prime ministers and returned their calls. President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, one of the numerous early callers, was not one of the chosen few.

The favored world leaders were Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso, Mexican President Felipe Calderon, South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

All are leaders of democracies known as important allies of the United States. Two are Asians—Aso and Lee; one is leader of the centerpiece of US policy in the Middle East, Olmert of Israel; Calderon heads Mexico, the most strategic US neighbor in Latin America; and the rest are leaders of Europe’s most important democracies.

Apparently, the message Obama's staff sent the Philippines is: We'll get back to you, someday, maybe, when we feel like it.

These telephone chats over the past few days gave a first glimpse into the “world view” of the incoming administration—the countries that mattered to it, the countries Obama have downgraded and the issues that concern it most as he redefines US foreign policy in the post-Bush era.

From the looks of it, the Philippines is not on the Obama radar screen, no matter how our humiliated leaders on the waiting list claim our strategic importance is to the United States in the Asia-Pacific region and our historic ties with Washington.

Obama has barely a couple of years experience as junior senator from Illinois and has only a brushing acquaintance with foreign policy. It’s very likely the Philippines struck him as just a speck on the map.

Ya know, I think they're pissed.

The sidelining of the Arroyo call gave a glimpse of the importance of the Philippines to the United States at a moment of change of administration.

It is clear that the Philippines stands on the outer perimeter of US concerns in world affairs.

The first telephone conversations reveal the Philippines is not within the charmed circles of the Obama administration. It is a leper outside looking in.

It is imperative that Manila should rearrange its priorities vis-à-vis Washington. Obama is not our friend.

Yep, they're pissed.

92 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:55:23pm

re: #83 Tappin52

If he dismantles the USA, he dismantles his own gravy train. Obviously, I'm missing something here.

But so too every communist regime ever. They punish the wealth producers and then are surprised that poverty ensues. By definition, a commie ain't that good at logic.

93 midwestgak  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:55:26pm

re: #80 turn

Everybody is getting in on this $700 bil handout. I read where Amex was turned into a bank overnight so they can cash in. Imagine when O and the dem congress gets to call the shots on where this money is spent, we really will have huge government bureaucracies spring up, essentially putting people to work for the government O at the taxpayer's expense.

Sorry. I agree with you. :(

94 Peter Verkooijen  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:55:53pm

BTW, this is not the first secret/classified information that has come out since the handover process started.

95 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:05pm

Considering that leaking info is an accepted practice by both sides in Washington, has anyone considered that the White House leaked it? Look how bad it is making Obama look right now and what is Obama's camp going to say: No we didn't, the President did. They would look even dumber.

96 monkey den  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:06pm
"Senator Obama would be wise to keep close counsel," a top Bush source warned.

I love that line. I predict a lot of "cannibalism" in this administration.

97 Ojoe  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:08pm

re: #84 PAgirlinNC

"There have always been enormous numbers of silly people."

That's a paraphrase of Winston Churchill's words.

Nothing new, we'll get through this.

98 unreconstructed rebel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:12pm

So, here you are, a big wig in the DoD. It's your turn to brief George Soros' Sock Puppet.

Just what do you plan to say?

99 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:17pm

The leak probably came from Obama personally.

How utterly insecure is this guy that he feels the need to leak this sort of thing?

This is NOT a leader, its a chicken.

If Obama can't learn to keep his big yap shut NOBODY is going to tell him anything.

100 Clemente  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:41pm

One of these two should never have a security clearance.

101 midwestgak  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:42pm

re: #82 Silhouette

Isn't LGF a bank? I'm pretty sure we are.

hahahahahahaha oh wait. That was funny until I realized LGF would be acting like every other moonbat graber.

I take it back.

102 Ojoe  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:42pm

BBL got to get some work done.

103 ClosetConservative  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:46pm

The fundamental difference between Barack Obama and John F. Kennedy is that Kennedy spoke softly and carried a big stick, while Brilliant Barack bloviated at the top of his lungs and carried a twig.

104 3 wood  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:47pm

re: #35 WrathofG-d

The LA times knew that those that wanted the tape have no leg to stand on, and would move on if they just waited them out.

My guess is they destroyed the tape shortly after they realized how damaging it would be to the Messiah.

Now, if it contained military secrets which might endanger the troops, the LA Times would have run it 24 hours a day.

105 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:56:56pm

I'm surprised the zero didn't piss all around the Oval Office to mark 'his' territory.

106 ilyaunion  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:57:04pm

Does anyone think it's ironic how the candidate who promised change and a new type of government in Washington, free of Washington insiders, has so far surrounded himself, with anything but?

107 Buck  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:57:07pm

re: #79 Amy

Question: were Obama'a aides there at the meeting with Bush, or was it just the two of them? If no one else was there, that means that Obama himself did the leaking, doesn't it?

Obama shared with his staff, and they leaked it.

Basically if this is true, then Bush tried to make a deal, and Obama shared the details of the possible deal with his staff. They in turn, not knowing how people would think about the deal, leaked it to see what kind iof a reaction it would have. They also wanted to embarrass Bush. If bush was putting a condition on a stimulus package, then he is the bad guy.

108 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:57:11pm

re: #60 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Most "leakers" do so anonymously.

I remember reading about a couple of guys during the Civil War who bought gold, and wanted to be sure the price would go up. They spread a rumor that Lincoln was going to draft 300,000 more men. The rumor spread like wildfire, and it worked! People panicked, and put their money into more stable investments, like gold, which drove the price up.

The source of the rumor was eventually tracked down to these two, and they were arrested, as well as fined for the amount of profit they made.

The funny thing was, at the time, Lincoln was considering drafting 400,000 more people in the army, and the panic caused by the hoax showed him that this was a bad idea.

109 Noam Chumpski  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:57:17pm

re: #79 Amy

Question: were Obama'a aides there at the meeting with Bush, or was it just the two of them? If no one else was there, that means that Obama himself did the leaking, doesn't it?

My first thought as well, but it doesn't add up. Who knows.

110 SixDegrees  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:57:39pm

I think there are two reasons for this. One is simple thuggery from a man unwilling to wait two months to take office. He wants to be President now, not in January. This seems to be a major character trait/flaw that's been exhibited throughout his career - when he can't get something done immediately, he starts getting frustrated and the backbiting begins.

Second is the need for a scapegoat, and Bush is handy. I've heard a sentiment expressed by quite a few people at work and elsewhere, less than a week after the election, that has got to be making Obama nervous. People are wondering why, now that he's been elected, the stock market is still tanking and their 401k's haven't begun to recover yet. Stupid and unrealistic? You bet - it will be months before any sort of meaningful recovery gets underway in the markets. Unexpected? Not at all. People have hung all kinds of unrealistic expectations on an Obama Presidency, including a sort of voodoo-like expectation that the election itself was all that was needed to purge evil from the land and start the milk and honey flowing. Continued thrashing of their retirement funds is starting to make people wonder whether the Emperor is wearing any clothes.

In order to keep these dashed expectations from spilling over and staining his personality cult, Obama needs a high-profile target to re-direct blame onto. Look for a great deal more Bush-bashing even than occurred during the campaign itself, as Obama's emerging failures to deliver on all the items people wrote onto his deliberately blank slate instantly start wearing away at his support.

I bet you won't see too many reports on Obama's approval rating over the next couple of months. Just as he was able to ride a wave of irrational popularity into office by saying and doing nothing, he will now start to be swallowed by a wave of disenchantment while he continues to say and do nothing.

You can write anything you want on a blank slate.

111 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:57:47pm

re: #69 unreconstructed rebel

I am told that the TLA agencies & the Pentagon had very serious problems with Bubba. They will probably be very careful with Zero.

(Now, why couldn't the Secret Service use "Zero"?)


Ha Ha .. secret code name Zero.

Secret service agent 1: "What is Zero doing now?"
SSA 2: "Zero"
SSA 1: "Have you seen any activity in Zero's office"
SSA 2: "Zero"
SSA 1: "Do you know what Zero's plans are in that situation?"
SSA 2: "Zero"

Ha

112 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:58:05pm

re: #95 Creeping Eruption

Considering that leaking info is an accepted practice by both sides in Washington, has anyone considered that the White House leaked it? Look how bad it is making Obama look right now and what is Obama's camp going to say: No we didn't, the President did. They would look even dumber.

I think the Bush administration's angry reaction suggests otherwise.

113 dmays  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:58:13pm

Obama has screwed up his first post election presser (classless Nancy Reagan remark) and now he has screwed up his first meeting with his predecessor. Both are easy tasks that Obama should have done successfully without much effort.

It's going to be a long four years.

114 SFGoth  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:58:24pm

After 8 years of Bush and 4-8 of Obama, we're going to long for Bill Clinton. Oy vey.
Listen mister we could use a lech like William Clinton again.
Forced to sign welfare reform
Not quite as bad to the unborn
Gee at least he seemed so warm
Those, were, the, days

115 midwestgak  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:58:45pm

re: #113 dmays

Obama has screwed up his first post election presser (classless Nancy Reagan remark) and now he has screwed up his first meeting with his predecessor. Both are easy tasks that Obama should have done successfully without much effort.

It's going to be a long four years.

Seems to be a repeating phrase here.

116 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:58:45pm

This sounds too much like some disgruntled passive-aggressive current administration worker bee lashing out anonymously at a hated departing boss from the safety of the shadows. I seriously doubt that Obama or His administration will be the source of leaks since His campaign was protected by the very media that was the gleeful co-conspirators in undermining virtually anything and everything Bush tried to do.

117 bill-tb  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:58:46pm

Strategic leaks ... don't fall for it for one minute.

118 pat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:58:51pm

re: #91 Steffan

Maybe the Philippines would be more important if they had renewed the bases leases. As it is, Obama's assessment is pretty much correct. The call from the Governor of Guam now takes precedence.

119 calcajun  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:59:05pm

re: #96 monkey den

I love that line. I predict a lot of "cannibalism" in this administration.

Not with Rham Emanuel, he won't.

120 midwestgak  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:59:10pm

bbl

121 3 wood  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:59:38pm

re: #53 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

What HAS he done?

He said "hope", "change", and "yes we can".

This go around that was enough. What an empty suit.

122 the other Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:59:39pm

Amy,
The drudge story says it was just Bush and Obama.


The two met at the White House in private, without staff.

On another site, a person posted that this wonderful, it shows how transparent the Obama presidency will be vs. the evil Bush who hides all.

Except, if Obama really wanted to be transparent, why not just hold a press conference, or send out a press release. Why pretend that he did not leak it?

from the other Amy

123 Peter Verkooijen  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:59:48pm

re: #40 kenprice

If true (and I'm not certain, yet) this is gross stupidity. Someone in the Obama entourage appears to be trying to make "brownie points" with the Press. ...

It was a private conversation, so that someone is Obama himself.

124 AnotherRightWingConspirator  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 1:59:50pm

Ready on Day One!

125 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:00:05pm

re: #79 Amy

Question: were Obama'a aides there at the meeting with Bush, or was it just the two of them? If no one else was there, that means that Obama himself did the leaking, doesn't it?

I heard it was just the two of them ..

126 Charles Johnson  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:00:14pm

re: #45 jamgarr

I disagree. The wrath of Rahm will descend on anyone guilty of leaking. Count on it.

Rahm Emmanuel was notorious for being one of the biggest leakers in the Clinton administration.

127 SixDegrees  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:00:23pm

re: #53 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Rush read a CNN poll on Obama saying that 74% of the American people approved of what Obama's done so far. WTF? What HAS he done? I sometimes feel we're sunk.

See my post, above, on how I think this is going to play out. The euphoria seems to be fading fast, at least in my neck of the woods; Some of O's most rabid supporters are starting to wonder why their 401k's haven't recovered back to Dow 14000 levels yet. It's been almost a week since the election, after all.

128 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:00:46pm

BOzo and his "wife" flew from Chicago to Washington DC yesterday on separate planes, and she was waiting in the limo when he got off his plane. This guy is so full of himself.

129 jamgarr  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:00pm

re: #126 Charles

Rahm Emmanuel was notorious for being one of the biggest leakers in the Clinton administration.

But now he's the gatekeeper.

130 CIA Reject  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:05pm

re: #84 PAgirlinNC

I know. It's just really sad to think that there are 56 million idiots in this country... I mean, I knew they were out there but - that many?

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Watching "The Longest Day" on AMC and recalling how Pop Reject (a WWII vet) used to say that it was a good thing that WWII was fought in the 1940's because if we had to fight it today we'd lose. That was meant as a joke thirty years ago, but now I'm not so sure...

Fortunately,for now, there's still a cadre of superlative people in our armed forces, but under BO's inept "leadership" I don't know how much longer many of them will be able to remain.

131 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:24pm

re: #107 Buck

Obama shared with his staff, and they leaked it.

Basically if this is true, then Bush tried to make a deal, and Obama shared the details of the possible deal with his staff. They in turn, not knowing how people would think about the deal, leaked it to see what kind iof a reaction it would have. They also wanted to embarrass Bush. If bush was putting a condition on a stimulus package, then he is the bad guy.

I think you're right. When I said that Obama did the leaking, I didn't mean that he personally called up the press but that he must have divulged the contents of the conversation to others because he was the only one there besides Bush. And I agree that it was intended to embarrass Bush.

132 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:28pm

re: #110 SixDegrees

It's called "Snowballing" (Animal Farm reference).

133 newsjunkie_ky  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:34pm

re: #111 turn

Ha Ha .. secret code name Zero.

Secret service agent 1: "What is Zero doing now?"
SSA 2: "Zero"
SSA 1: "Have you seen any activity in Zero's office"
SSA 2: "Zero"
SSA 1: "Do you know what Zero's plans are in that situation?"
SSA 2: "Zero"

Ha


wife of zero's SSA name: less than zero.

134 spidly  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:40pm

re: #119 calcajun

Not with Rham Emanuel, he won't.

particularly with Rham. cannibalizing is his specialty.

135 jamgarr  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:46pm

Not to say that the approved, strategic leaks won't happen.

136 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:01:51pm

re: #109 Noam Chumpski

My first thought as well, but it doesn't add up. Who knows.

Why doesn't it "add up"?

137 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:02:02pm

re: #112 Amy

I think the Bush administration's angry reaction suggests otherwise.

I'd do the exact same thing. Leak and then complain with hearty righteous indignation. Obama looks the fool.

138 badger1970  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:02:09pm

"What a wicked web we weave when we practice to deceive". It would behoove Obama to remember that (or his sugar daddy).

139 3 wood  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:02:14pm

By the way, the New York Times stock price set yet another 52 week low, closing at $8.38, a drop of 3.46% in one day.

And I am cheering every inch of their sinking.

140 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:02:24pm

re: #122 the other Amy

Except, if Obama really wanted to be transparent, why not just hold a press conference, or send out a press release. Why pretend that he did not leak it?

Because he's a schmuck?

141 spidly  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:02:26pm

re: #132 Who Watches the Watchmen?

It's called "Snowballing" (Animal Farm reference).

as long as that's not a "Clerks" reference.

142 littleO  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:02:27pm

? We are the people we have become.

Barry, Michelle, Nancy, Harry, Harold, Rahm etc. were once little children who had not a shred of guile or ruthlessness in them. Then they were educated in our system of education. Don't forget that.

143 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:02:42pm

This isn't the first time Bush and Obama talked, and then Obama ran to the press.

They met when Obama was a new Senator waaay back in...a couple of years ago, and Obama told the press that Bush was all smiles and then turned "downright frightening."

"Suddenly it felt as if somebody in a back room had flipped a switch," Obama wrote. "The president's eyes became fixed; his voice took on the agitated, rapid tone of someone neither accustomed to nor welcoming interruption; his easy affability was replaced by an almost messianic certainty. As I watched my mostly Republican Senate colleagues hang on his every word, I was reminded of the dangerous isolation that power can bring, and appreciated the Founders' wisdom in designating a system to keep power in check."

When I quoted from this passage to Bush during an Oval Office interview, the president seemed irritated to learn he had been taken to task by the senator he once counseled.

I thought I was actually showing some kindness," Bush said indignantly. "And out of that he came with this belief?"

The president added with a bit of a scowl: "He doesn't know me very well."

144 pat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:03pm

Rahm is a devious thug. As a plotter, he is as transparent as glass. he can not stop himself from bragging, chastising, and attempting to destroy those who disagree with him.

145 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:18pm

re: #113 dmays

Obama has screwed up his first post election presser (classless Nancy Reagan remark) and now he has screwed up his first meeting with his predecessor. Both are easy tasks that Obama should have done successfully without much effort.

It's going to be a long four years.


Yet again, I'm reminded of McCain's quip that President of the USA is not a job suited to on-the-job training.

Obama has now made several bumbles that anyone with any actual executive political experience would not have. He's still in the steep part of the learning curve.

Meanwhile America's allies are starting to think, "You know, that Cowboy Bush. . .maybe he's not all that bad after all".

There is absolutely no question Obama will make more of these blunders, but hopefully (hope!) they'll occur BEFORE he takes office.

146 Noam Chumpski  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:34pm

re: #126 Charles

Rahm Emmanuel was notorious for being one of the biggest leakers in the Clinton administration.

Fer real. Obama has the meeting wit Bush, tells his staff what was said, and then comes the leak. Obama isn't our brightest star, but he wouldn't have thought to do it.

147 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:34pm

re: #40 kenprice

If true (and I'm not certain, yet) this is gross stupidity. Someone in the Obama entourage appears to be trying to make "brownie points" with the Press. No government can operate with everything they discuss being public knowledge before any decision can be made. Worse, there is no way to know what's true, and what's someones leaking to force a decision. Obama may find himself losing control of his administration before he ever unpacks his bags at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

You're assuming that he ever had control in the first place.

Most of the conflicting messages from the Obama camp could be staffers looking for MSM brownie points.

148 unreconstructed rebel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:46pm

re: #128 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

BOzo and his "wife" flew from Chicago to Washington DC yesterday on separate planes, and she was waiting in the limo when he got off his plane. This guy is so full of himself.

You mean it took two (that's 2) aircraft to fly them to DC?

... So much for Gobal Warming!

149 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:49pm

re: #114 SFGoth

I would prefer to look to the days of Reagan or either Bush again before I start pining for the fjords halcyon days of Clinton.

150 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:50pm

At some point, something will leak in a way that embarrasses lots of high-up people in Obama's Administration. And the resultant witch hunt will be a joy to behold (I recommend laying in a supply of popcorn and Raisinets).

151 unclassifiable  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:52pm

re: #98 unreconstructed rebel

Don't worry. It's cool. I'm sending the wolf.

152 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:54pm

re: #81 3 wood

Yep. and Uncle Joe told you it would cause a major challenge by foreign powers within 6 months.


Ask yourself, if you were a terrorist, would Obama in the White House make you hesitate to strike?

Sadly I think it's not a question of if, but when.

153 Big Steve  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:03:56pm

rookie mistake

154 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:04:22pm

re: #126 Charles

Rahm Emmanuel was notorious for being one of the biggest leakers in the Clinton administration.

And being FAR wiser than Obama, he'll probably continue to get away with this for some time.

155 rusty_armor  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:04:24pm

Well ... the difference in simple "class" was shown here. Obama is a bumbling, boorish fool.

LET THE FUMBLES BEGIN!

156 AGE1607  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:04:27pm

re: #106 ilyaunion

Does anyone think it's ironic how the candidate who promised change and a new type of government in Washington, free of Washington insiders, has so far surrounded himself, with anything but?

As far as I know the only people he knows are Washington insiders and his allies in Chicago. so he really had no choice except for the insiders.

157 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:04:38pm

re: #82 Silhouette

Isn't LGF a bank? I'm pretty sure we are.

Rock solid foundations!

158 Opinionated  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:04:51pm

Don't get giddy.

These leaks where deliberate to pressure the current Administration.

It's not an indication that the Obama Administration will be undisciplined.

It's an indication that they will do anything to harm their enemies.

159 Noam Chumpski  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:05:11pm

re: #136 Amy

Why doesn't it "add up"?

See my post 146 :) Obama leaking it himself doesn't pass my critical thinking test. It's just so much easier for someone else to do it on their own or for him.

160 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:05:17pm

re: #114 SFGoth

After 8 years of Bush and 4-8 of Obama, we're going to long for Bill Clinton. Oy vey.
Listen mister we could use a lech like William Clinton again.
Forced to sign welfare reform
Not quite as bad to the unborn
Gee at least he seemed so warm
Those, were, the, days

What do you mean, "long for Bill Clinton"?

The Obama Administration is going to be a total rehash of the Clinton Administration. The only difference is that the part of James Carville will be played by David Axelrod.

161 opnion  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:05:33pm

Obama is about as trustworthy as your average Banana Spider.
To quote the Danny DiVito from Romancing the Stone, "We're in some serious shit heh"

162 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:05:43pm

You rethugs are so stupid! Anybody can see it's a classic false flag operation, and Chimpy Bushitler is the leaker. Gotta go, the black helicopters are coming and my checken pot pie is ready!
/

163 AnotherRightWingConspirator  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:05:50pm

He'll make up the rules as he goes along. After all, he's Ready To Rule! Ready on Day One! Barry and Michelle, sitting by the red phone at three a.m.

Yes We Did!

164 monkey den  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:05:51pm

re: #119 calcajun

Not with Rham Emanuel, he won't.

I wouldn't even be able to look at that midget. There is something about the sight of his face that angers me. It's likely the Napoleon complex.

165 Shiplord Kirel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:05:58pm

A prediction:
The biggest military secret since the Manhattan project will go public during the next few weeks.

166 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:06:08pm

Guess whose election contributions are getting audited by the FEC?

Nope, not 0bama's. Why would they audit his contributions?

167 Noam Chumpski  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:06:10pm

re: #158 Opinionated

Don't get giddy.

These leaks where deliberate to pressure the current Administration.

It's not an indication that the Obama Administration will be undisciplined.

It's an indication that they will do anything to harm their enemies.

Bingo. Now there's something that makes sense.

168 vapig  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:06:14pm

Thank you, Charles, for the Poppy on your banner. I really miss seeing the old veterans outside of public buildings offering them to people. I used to have a bouquet of them. After all the years and all the moves I still have one left from years ago.

169 Dave the.....  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:06:28pm

Dmays

Obama has screwed up his first post election presser (classless Nancy Reagan remark) and now he has screwed up his first meeting with his predecessor. Both are easy tasks that Obama should have done successfully without much effort.

A supporter could say first time excitement. Detractors (like me) say he looks very amateurish. Could be a lot of on-the-job training for Obama and his crew.

And did we ever figure out what the "Office of President-Elect" is? Does he realize how stupid that looked? Doesn't he have a grown up to say "ummm, let's tone this down a bit"?

170 unclassifiable  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:06:52pm

re: #82 Silhouette

It's an idea and opinion bank.

171 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:07:19pm

re: #154 looking closely

And being FAR wiser than Obama, he'll probably continue to get away with this for some time.

Shades of "Yes, Prime Minister" -- except Obama hasn't had the ministerial experience of a Jim Hacker.

172 winston06  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:07:19pm

He will be worse than Carter and Clinton. Trust me on that!

173 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:07:20pm

re: #95 Creeping Eruption

Considering that leaking info is an accepted practice by both sides in Washington, has anyone considered that the White House leaked it? Look how bad it is making Obama look right now and what is Obama's camp going to say: No we didn't, the President did. They would look even dumber.


Look bad? Seriously, the MSM is fawning over the leak. They're making him look good over it.

174 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:07:32pm
175 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:07:42pm

re: #147 Steffan

You're assuming that he ever had control in the first place.

Most of the conflicting messages from the Obama camp could be staffers looking for MSM brownie points.


They should be looking for Obama Brownie points.

And if Obama knew what's good for him, he'd find this leaker, and make a nice example of firing them to set the appropriate precedent early. (That is, of course, if the leaker weren't Obama himself, or a confidant authorized to make the leak).

176 unreconstructed rebel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:10pm

Time & Torture make it necessary to retire. Tomorrow.

177 winston06  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:29pm

re: #126 Charles

Yep. He leaked to the press whatever he didn't like about his boss Bill Clinton. This will be a horrible presidency. What a shame!

178 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:31pm

re: #66 Izzy Dunne

Dead Horse.

Besides, Charles banned the subject months ago.

179 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:32pm

re: #174 buzzsawmonkey

"I'm a BLABBERMOUTH!"

--Ralph Kramden Barack Obama

When will he get to "hummena hummena hummena"?

180 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:33pm

re: #148 unreconstructed rebel

You mean it took two (that's 2) aircraft to fly them to DC?

... So much for Gobal Warming!

It's only Glo-Bull warming if a Republican does it. If Gore, RFK Jr, Kerry, et al, do it, well, they buy carbon offsets, I guess.

181 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:35pm

re: #122 the other Amy

Amy,
The drudge story says it was just Bush and Obama.

On another site, a person posted that this wonderful, it shows how transparent the Obama presidency will be vs. the evil Bush who hides all.

Except, if Obama really wanted to be transparent, why not just hold a press conference, or send out a press release. Why pretend that he did not leak it?

from the other Amy

Excellent question; if Obama thought there would be nothing wrong with the public's knowing this stuff, why didn't he just come right out and say it publicly? Clearly, it was intended to embarrass Bush, and it seems to have done exactly that. Poor W - starting with Putin and continuing with the Saudi thugocracy, he always tries to see the good in people and to given them the benefit of the doubt even when good sense would suggest that he do otherwise.

Obama reminds me of that old story about the scorpion who offers to take the frog across the river on his back. Before they get to the opposite shore, the scorpion fatally stings the frog. When the frog asks the scorpion why he did it, the scorpion replies, "Because I am a scorpion, and that is what scorpions do."

This is Obama's nature.

182 gop_patriot  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:39pm

re: #143 Silhouette

The 0 is an ass.

183 Peter Verkooijen  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:47pm

re: #158 Opinionated

These leaks where deliberate to pressure the current Administration.

It's not an indication that the Obama Administration will be undisciplined.

It's an indication that they will do anything to harm their enemies.

Exactly!

184 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:49pm

re: #137 Creeping Eruption

I'd do the exact same thing. Leak and then complain with hearty righteous indignation. Obama looks the fool.

So far it sure ain't taking all that much to make that happen. All it apparently takes so far is to get Obama to be Himself.

185 Big Steve  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:08:52pm

re: #158 Opinionated

Don't get giddy.

These leaks where deliberate to pressure the current Administration.

It's not an indication that the Obama Administration will be undisciplined.

It's an indication that they will do anything to harm their enemies.

Possibly...however Bush coming out so quick to school him, makes Obama look like a chump. So either it was on purpose and backfired or it was just a bone-headed thing. Either way, Obama looks stupid.

186 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:09:12pm

This should get a chuckle here: Obama Team adopts Ethics Rules

187 Gretchen  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:09:26pm

Well it could be a leak, five-year olds have trouble keeping secrets to themselves - telling secrets make them feel important.

It could also be made up to make Bush look bad (shocking I know) and force his hand on UAW bail outs.

Either way it ain't pretty, or surprising.

188 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:09:54pm

re: #99 looking closely

The leak probably came from Obama personally.

How utterly insecure is this guy that he feels the need to leak this sort of thing?

This is NOT a leader, its a chicken.

If Obama can't learn to keep his big yap shut NOBODY is going to tell him anything.

Yes it did come from O but his handlers wouldn't have let him off with "It was a private conversation" as an answer either.

189 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:09:54pm

re: #161 opnion

Obama is about as trustworthy as your average Banana Spider.
To quote the Danny DiVito from Romancing the Stone, "We're in some serious shit heh"

He needs an LBJ to pick him up by his ears like a beagle.

190 bkgodfrey  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:10:15pm

Obama's too damn young and gitty to keep his mouth shut for one second, concerning anything. Who ever thought we would have a President where sources within his own government would keep things from him (my prediction), for fear of him getting it splashed across every paper in town.

191 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:10:22pm
192 FrogMarch  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:10:33pm

What did we expect? Obama flips people off.

193 Buck  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:10:44pm

Charles... A suggestion for the Comments box... A Cancel button. I often start a comment, but think better of it...

194 gop_patriot  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:10:44pm

re: #186 Creeping Eruption

This should get a chuckle here: Obama Team adopts Ethics Rules

Two "http"s in that link, fixed. :)

195 calcajun  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:11:01pm

re: #128 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

BOzo and his "wife" flew from Chicago to Washington DC yesterday on separate planes, and she was waiting in the limo when he got off his plane. This guy is so full of himself.

Mebbe they needed some alone time.

196 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:11:03pm

re: #194 gop_patriot

Thanks.

197 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:11:26pm

re: #146 Noam Chumpski

Fer real. Obama has the meeting wit Bush, tells his staff what was said, and then comes the leak. Obama isn't our brightest star, but he wouldn't have thought to do it.

Don't kid yourself. Obama is very bright.

198 gop_patriot  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:11:27pm

re: #191 Creeping Eruption

You're fast! lol :)

199 Nevergiveup  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:11:47pm

re: #191 Creeping Eruption

Lets try again: Obama Transition Team adopts Ethical standards

That's the first time in months i have linked to that gossip rag!

200 Big Steve  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:13pm

re: #193 Buck

Charles... A suggestion for the Comments box... A Cancel button. I often start a comment, but think better of it...

Just highlight your comment and hit delete

201 eschew_obfuscation  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:17pm

re: #162 Who Watches the Watchmen?

You rethugs are so stupid! Anybody can see it's a classic false flag operation, and Chimpy Bushitler is the leaker. Gotta go, the black helicopters are coming and my checken pot pie is ready!
/

NO! WWtW! MY POTPIE...Mom, WWtW is being a dildoe!

202 SixDegrees  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:29pm

re: #131 Amy

I think you're right. When I said that Obama did the leaking, I didn't mean that he personally called up the press but that he must have divulged the contents of the conversation to others because he was the only one there besides Bush. And I agree that it was intended to embarrass Bush.

I'm beginning to have serious doubts about the abilities and professionalism of Obama's staff. This - a serious breach of etiquette, to cast it in the best light - follows on the release on (Wondrous!)change.gov of the now-defunct "draft" proposal. I suspect this was never the official plan, but rather the wet dream of some transition team intern, and when the adults got wind of it they went through the roof and yanked it immediately. But the fact that this sort of thing is happening at all, let alone on a seemingly regular basis, indicates that there's a whole pit crew of absolutely clueless amateurs about to seize the reins of power. Not exactly a comforting thought - if I were, for example, Vladimir Putin, I would be directing my puppet government to prepare for a Christmas Invasion of Georgia, and maybe a few other former Soviet satellite states, on the grounds that such ineptitude will never be able to formulate a meaningful response. If I were, for example, Hugo Chavez, I would be ramping up for some serious expansionism into Columbia. And if I were, for example, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad...well, let's just not even think about what I might have in mind to take advantage of a wet-behind-the-ears rookie while I was watching my own economy circle the drain along with plummeting oil prices as my populace grew increasingly agitated and restless, and just might be appeased by, oh, say a region-wide war that would direct their attention elsewhere.

203 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:29pm

I keep hearing "leaks", plural.

How many things that Bush and 0 surfaced?

204 CIA Reject  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:37pm

re: #195 calcajun

Mebbe they needed some alone time.

I'm sure that after the election the WAB is insufferable, even for BO.

Heh!

205 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:39pm

re: #188 turn

Yes it did come from O but his handlers wouldn't have let him off with "It was a private conversation" as an answer either.


Its not up to them to let him do anything.

He's the POTUS (or soon to be), and THEY serve at HIS pleasure, not the other way around.

Again, if I were Obama, I'd find the leaker and accept their "resignation". (That is, presuming he didn't authorize the leak).

206 redstateredneck  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:47pm

re: #195 calcajun

Mebbe they needed some alone time.

I heard that she was looking at private schools for the girls. She came ahead of him and stayed later.

207 wolfie  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:12:56pm

re: #137 Creeping Eruption

I'd do the exact same thing. Leak and then complain with hearty righteous indignation. Obama looks the fool.

Oh, for heaven's sake. Why should Bush care to make Obama look the fool? Why should Bush care about anything political anymore? He gave up political struggle a couple of years ago. He just plain gave up.

208 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:13:07pm

re: #199 Nevergiveup

That's the first time in months i have linked to that gossip rag!

Didn't mean to put you out. I was going for humor over substance there. I'll put a NSL (Not Safe for Lizards) tag on it next time.

209 SFGoth  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:13:17pm

re: #149 FurryOldGuyJeans

I would prefer to look to the days of Reagan or either Bush again before I start pining for the fjords halcyon days of Clinton.

Yuck. For all of Clinton's foibles, Bush I gave us the monstrosity called the ADA, which is basically a giant lefty lever to screw property and business owners (signed with his usual dopey-ass grin) and Bush II gave us FDR II. It's like the end of the Romanovs sorta.

210 CapeCoddah  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:13:21pm

re: #193 Buck

Charles... A suggestion for the Comments box... A Cancel button. I often start a comment, but think better of it...

Good Idea, an Edit button, maybe also, to fix errors post posting!

211 bkgodfrey  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:13:24pm

re: #197 Amy

he is smart in the sense that he knows with whom to align himself with. when it comes to critical and analytical thinking abilities, his "off the cuf" statements and interviews say it all.

but hey, it's all about who you know eh?

212 Joan Not of Arc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:13:25pm

No surprise.
Whether it's incompetence or testing the waters (as many here have suggested), it spells a disastrous tour in the White House. I'm sure it helps with a press that laps up everything the Obamas say and do.

213 right_on_target  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:13:35pm

re: #128 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

BOzo and his "wife" flew from Chicago to Washington DC yesterday on separate planes, and she was waiting in the limo when he got off his plane. This guy is so full of himself.


___
BØzo - copied that to my QuickNote
___
Why separate planes? Is she the V-P?

214 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:14:17pm

re: #207 wolfie

By that reasoning, why then complain about it? It was just a thought I tossed out there.

215 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:14:22pm

re: #197 Amy

Don't kid yourself. Obama is very bright.


He's also extremely green.

He's never run anything in his life, except for his own office, and he's starting WAY at the top here. He'll get better. . .but its on our dime now.

216 Nevergiveup  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:14:27pm

re: #208 Creeping Eruption

Didn't mean to put you out. I was going for humor over substance there. I'll put a NSL (Not Safe for Lizards) tag on it next time.

I'll survive!

217 WhatDoIKnow  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:14:45pm

Can't really say I'm surprised, I also wonder that no one mentioned the NYT top secret leak about the Al-Qaeda rules of engagement and how it was leaked after the "One" received his first real national security briefing that it occurred! Hmmm, could not be them could it?

218 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:15:08pm
219 Miss Trixie  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:15:23pm

OT

Watching the last halk-hour of (and it's a shame I missed most of it) "Battleground" and I was struck by this quote that's as true today as it was then:

The Chaplain: [at an interfaith service for the soldiers] Now it's nearly Christmas... and here we are in beautiful Bastogne enjoying the winter sports. And the $64 question is: "Was this trip necessary?" I'll try to answer that. But my sermons, like everything else in the army... depend on the situation and the terrain. So I assure you this is going to be a quickie. Was this trip necessary? Let's look at the facts. Nobody wanted this war but the Nazis. A great many people tried to deal with them, and a lot of them are dead. Millions have died... for no other reason except that the Nazis wanted them dead. So, in the final showdown, there was nothing left to do except fight. There's a great lesson in this. Those of us who've learned it the hard way aren't going to forget it. We must never again let any force dedicated to a super-race... or a super-idea, or super-anything... become strong enough to impose itself upon a free world. We must be smart enough and tough enough in the beginning... to put out the fire before it starts spreading. My answer to the sixty-four dollar question is yes, this trip was necessary. As the years go by, a lot of people are going to forget. But you won't. And don't ever let anybody tell you you were a sucker to fight in the war against fascism. And now, Jerry permitting, let us pray. Almighty God...
[artillery drowns him out]
The Chaplain: The organist is hitting those bass notes a little too loud for me to be heard. So let each of us pray in his own way, to his own God.

Link.

220 freedombilly  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:15:24pm

Obama is cut from the same cloth as Pat "Leaky" Leahy.

221 Big Steve  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:15:57pm

To me this whole leak issue is symptomatic of the fact that Obama still has not had to make a decision he has to be accountable for. He chats with Bush and than blabs about Bush wanting a quid pro quo...but at this point Obama doesn't have skin in the game so feels very comfortable talking about it with his staff. His staff, in turn, is trying to ingratiate themselves to the media so they pass it on. However some day soon, it will be decisions that Obama has to explain and live with. At that point these leaks will be a problem.

222 Buck  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:15:59pm

re: #200 Big Steve

Just highlight your comment and hit delete

I know, but it would be nice to be sure it is canceled...

223 ErnieG  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:16:12pm

The leaks that I really fear are the ones that develop after Obama's people have gone through the White House files. I am sure that every White House has generated files of "graveyard" stuff that in the National Interest will not see the light of day for 20 to 50 years. They will be combing through this stuff looking for something they can use to justify a special counsel or a call to the New York Times, National Interest be damned.

224 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:16:15pm

re: #197 Amy

Don't kid yourself. Obama is very bright.

From The Corner on National Review Online: Inside Obama [John Derbyshire].


Much interesting email on my speculations about Obama's IQ and Big Five scores.

Wellnigh everyone takes issue with my having pegged the President-elect's IQ as "maybe over 140," which would put him in the 99.62 percentile. (To put it another way, it would mean that he was in the top 1.14 million of Americans by IQ.) This is all guesswork, of course, but I was going by:


(1) His academic record, even after discounting for affirmative action.

(2) The fact that he won't release his test scores. There are two possible reasons why he would refuse: (a) they are embarrasingly low (dolt!), or (b) they are embarrasingly high (elitist!). I'm going with (b) because of (1).

(3) Heritability of IQ, a well-established fact, with current estimates 40-80 percent heritable. Barack Obama senior, though cursed with a self-destructive personality, was a very smart guy indeed. Econometrics ain't tic-tac-toe. His Mom I'm not so sure about, but she completed a Ph.D., which is more than I managed.


On the Big Five, I'm being told my guesses are off. All right: way off. Here's a reader who really knows his Big Five … and should: he's a professor of psychology.


Openness to Experience: As commonly measured, this factor is driven substantially by "liberal" values such as tolerance. Persons higher in O also can be daydreamy and idealistic (versus hard headed and realistic). They also sound to most people like they know what they are talking about. Successful homicide investigators are very low in O — they deal with facts and don't go around dreaming up fantastical alternative scenarios (e.g. Columbian drug dealers killing a famous athlete’s ex-wife).

Conscientiousness: The higher Conscientiousness, as you suggest, is a given; I doubt anyone ever graduated from Harvard Law without the advantage of high Conscientiousness (people low in Conscientiousness are satisfied with St. John’s Law, and the Harvard application was too long, anyway). He dresses high C. And Conscientiousness correlates with IQ.

Extroversion: The higher Extroversion reflects Obama's desire to be in the spotlight and his taste for leadership. High extroverts make a good first impression. They are affable — but that doesn’t mean they think much of you.

Agreeableness: Here's the juicy part — very low Agreeableness. He is guarded and reluctant to trust others. He is competitive, even ruthless. Other people are just pawns in his game. He often feels superior to others. He is cynical about others' motives, because he knows that his own motives are impure. He cannot tolerate disagreement.

Neuroticism: Finally, … high Neuroticism. He is more sensitive than others to the pain that is life. Having Dad abandon you at age 2 will do that, as will having Mom abandon you at age 10. His tobacco use is a sign of high N — smoking calms the nerves (expect ex-President Obama to develop cancer like U.S. Grant?) And so, paradoxically, is his compulsive fitness — there is a weak, self-indulgent fat man inside of Mr. Obama struggling to be unleashed, and who is flagellated daily in the gym. I suspect that there is deep unhappiness beneath the flawless exterior.


[Me] Wow. Stuff to watch out for there.

225 No Dhummi  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:16:33pm

So I don't get it. Obama can apparently keep his top-secret talks with Palestinian Authority terrorists confidential, but not a private discussion with his own President?

Dare I suggest there may be loyalty issues?

226 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:17:35pm

re: #209 SFGoth

Well, yuck back at ya for all your revision of recent history. But then I wouldn't expect anything less from your take on things as evidenced here at lgf.

227 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:18:00pm

re: #139 3 wood

By the way, the New York Times stock price set yet another 52 week low, closing at $8.38, a drop of 3.46% in one day.

And I am cheering every inch of their sinking.

That's about the only good news in the stock market right now ...

Hey 3, is there going to be a bottom?

228 eschew_obfuscation  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:18:08pm

re: #191 Creeping Eruption

Lets try again: Obama Transition Team adopts Ethical standards

Well won't this be interesting. We all know how much the left thinks of rules meant to constrain them (along with others). If we ever find out the truth, I'd bet good money that there will be money and favors exchanged in return for ignoring the rules...and that the rules will be selectively applied.

229 3 wood  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:18:45pm

re: #172 winston06

He will be worse than Carter and Clinton. Trust me on that!

It will also be interesting to see how long the sewer rats in the MSM that helped protect this guy during the campaign continue try to protect him.

We might see an interesting tug of war when the handful of reporters in Washington that still have some minor measure of integrity left do battle with the rest.

Sort of like street whores fighting over a busy corner.

230 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:19:03pm

re: #221 Big Steve

To me this whole leak issue is symptomatic of the fact that Obama still has not had to make a decision he has to be accountable for. He chats with Bush and than blabs about Bush wanting a quid pro quo...but at this point Obama doesn't have skin in the game so feels very comfortable talking about it with his staff. His staff, in turn, is trying to ingratiate themselves to the media so they pass it on. However some day soon, it will be decisions that Obama has to explain and live with. At that point these leaks will be a problem.


Indeed.
Either Obama authorized this leak personally, or he didn't.
Neither way does it look good for him.
If he did this personally to attack Bush, he's petty and vindictive.
If one of his staffers did it without his knowledge, he's being played. If Obama can't control his staff, he won't be able to accomplish anything. Who knows what leaks won't be so benign next time.

231 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:19:39pm

re: #227 turn

That's about the only good news in the stock market right now ...

Hey 3, is there going to be a bottom?

There will be a bottom; just how far down that bottom will be is the question.

232 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:19:39pm
233 CofactorMatrix  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:19:47pm

Classless, boorish. Clearly a thug, a lightweight, and a complete jerk. In my day, we called this kind of person an "asshole".

If this guy doesn't even have enough class, brains or poise to recognize that you don't go blabbing private conversations with anybody much less the President of the United States, what the hell else does he not know about common courtesy, etiquette and professional protocol? He may have been an affirmative-action attendee at a fancy school, but at heart he's a hillbilly, and a boor.

234 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:19:51pm

re: #215 looking closely

He's also extremely green.

He's never run anything in his life, except for his own office, and he's starting WAY at the top here. He'll get better. . .but its on our dime now.

Agreed. Whiich is why everyone is paying such obsessively close attention to his appointments to sensitive and influential posts - everybody knows that that will tell us what we're in for and whether it's just going to be bad or

235 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:20:00pm

re: #213 right_on_target

___
BØzo - copied that to my QuickNote
___
Why separate planes? Is she the V-P?

Good question. I'll bet she doesn't go on too many overseas trips. She might steal some of his spotlight.

236 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:20:19pm

I'm getting some hamsterism here.

237 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:20:19pm

catastrophic.

238 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:20:50pm

Okay, seems better.

239 Promethea  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:20:53pm

re: #106 ilyaunion

Does anyone think it's ironic how the candidate who promised change and a new type of government in Washington, free of Washington insiders, has so far surrounded himself, with anything but?

That's about the only "good" thing I can say about him. What if he surrounded himself with people like Code Pink, Bernardine and Bill, Rev. Wright, and Khalid Whatsisname?

/Guess I need to go to the store and fill up my supply of scare quotes.

240 Walter Cronanty  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:20:57pm

With Rahm Emanuel and the rest of the Chicago mob in charge, this will be the most ruthless Whitehouse group ever. Leaks will happen only when the mob calculates that the leaks will benefit the One. If other leaks occur, the plumbers will be dispatched posthaste. And woe be unto those who "leak" without authorization and embarrass the One. Classified information is OK to leak. Leak anything that embarrasses the One, and you're done.

241 3 wood  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:21:08pm

re: #227 turn

Hey 3, is there going to be a bottom?

Yes, and where it is depends to a large extent now on just how mush Marxism Obama gets put through.

I got a lot of calls last week from long time investors telling me they were cashing out of the market and moving their money to tax free triple A muni's.

242 SFGoth  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:21:11pm

re: #226 FurryOldGuyJeans

Well, yuck back at ya for all your revision of recent history. But then I wouldn't expect anything less from your take on things as evidenced here at lgf.

Would you care to back your fighting words up with some citation to reality? What recent history have I revised? My take on things is conservatarian and I make no bones about that. If you think Bush I was a good president, wow. Other than managing to beat a 3rd rate army into submission with the invigorated U.S. Armed Forces, what the heck else did he do that's positive? He got played by the Dem Congress pretty well.

243 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:21:21pm

re: #157 turn

She was joking about getting a piece of the pie Turn ...

244 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:21:23pm

O'Ring. That's what the leak needs.

245 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:21:35pm

re: #191 Creeping Eruption

Why do I get the feeling that ethics will be as welcome, useful, and appreciated in the incoming administration as a red-headed stepchild is in a family.

246 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:22:07pm

re: #245 FurryOldGuyJeans

Why do I get the feeling that ethics will be as welcome, useful, and appreciated in the incoming administration as a red-headed stepchild is in a family.

But it sure makes neat, splashy headlines. /

247 IlyaUnion  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:22:20pm

Why is it that every article I read quote's Obama's election as historic? What's more historic about this election than any other one? It seems like this is a matter of race, and he seems like anything but a postracial candidate.

248 wolfie  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:22:49pm

re: #214 Creeping Eruption

By that reasoning, why then complain about it? It was just a thought I tossed out there.

Bush gave up politics, but not governing. He (via staffers) complained because Obama & Co. were being jerks and compromising a private talk. It just is NOT done. Not even Clinton did that.

BTW, I think w/ any other president your suspicions would be warranted and are dang smart. Why assume it was Obama?
But in Bush's case, we're dealing with a dead horse.

249 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:22:49pm

re: #191 Creeping Eruption

Lets try again: Obama Transition Team adopts Ethical standards

So does this mean that all those fine individuals who contributed internet contributions to the O campaign - like Mickey Mouse, Saddam Hussein, and Mr. QWERTYUIOP - won't be able to donate to the transition?

250 looking closely  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:22:52pm

re: #240 Walter Cronanty

With Rahm Emanuel and the rest of the Chicago mob in charge, this will be the most ruthless Whitehouse group ever. Leaks will happen only when the mob calculates that the leaks will benefit the One. If other leaks occur, the plumbers will be dispatched posthaste. And woe be unto those who "leak" without authorization and embarrass the One. Classified information is OK to leak. Leak anything that embarrasses the One, and you're done.

The Whitehouse is a rather large circus, and Obama is going to have his hands full dealing with it. . .perhaps more than full given his lack of experience.

Leaks plague EVERY Presidential administration, why should Obama be better able to deal with them than others?

251 opnion  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:23:32pm

How often have you heard that the world will respect us again, if only we do the right thing and elect Obama?
You have to wonder how comfortable foreign leaders will feel speaking with him in confidence.

252 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:23:41pm

re: #162 Who Watches the Watchmen?

You rethugs are so stupid! Anybody can see it's a classic false flag operation, and Chimpy Bushitler is the leaker. Gotta go, the black helicopters are coming and my checken pot pie is ready!
/

There must be a funny story behind this ?

253 Pullus Iulius  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:23:55pm

Expect a tidal wave of leaks to be coming out of the Ö administration. This is largely Amateur Hour for narcissists. And the only pros it will have will be the professional criminals.

254 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:00pm

re: #128 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

BOzo and his "wife" flew from Chicago to Washington DC yesterday on separate planes, and she was waiting in the limo when he got off his plane. This guy is so full of himself.

Any comments from Greenpeace?

/expecting to hear crickets

255 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:02pm

re: #224 stuiec

OK, but none of the psychological stuff relates to his intelligence.
Law students don't get to be the editor of the Harvard Law Review without having something on the ball. And I believe he graduated from Harvard Law cum laude. You can dismiss that if you wish, but I think it shows that the guy has smarts. No experience, no character, but smarts.

256 ErnieG  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:08pm

re: #245 FurryOldGuyJeans

Why do I get the feeling that ethics will be as welcome, useful, and appreciated in the incoming administration as a red-headed stepchild is in a family.

Maybe they'll do like the Scientologists and have their own in-house definition of the word "ethics."

257 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:23pm

re: #249 Occasional Reader

So does this mean that all those fine individuals who contributed internet contributions to the O campaign - like Mickey Mouse, Saddam Hussein, and Mr. QWERTYUIOP - won't be able to donate to the transition?

Apparently only up to 5K then Mickey will face investigation /

258 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:34pm

re: #247 IlyaUnion

When anyone says "historic" around me, I ask them what is so historic about it.

Just to force them to say it.

They look afraid to voice it for a split-second, and then state it, sometimes couched with a lot of "...you knooow..."

259 Promethea  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:48pm

re: #113 dmays

Obama has screwed up his first post election presser (classless Nancy Reagan remark) and now he has screwed up his first meeting with his predecessor. Both are easy tasks that Obama should have done successfully without much effort.

It's going to be a long four years.

In line with his third-finger use during the campaign. He seems like an overgrown adolescent, not a true grown-up.

260 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:50pm

re: #241 3 wood

and moving their money to tax free triple A muni's.

"Municipal bonds, Ted!"

261 jamgarr  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:24:51pm

re: #250 looking closely

Leaks plague EVERY Presidential administration, why should Obama be better able to deal with them than others?

Fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency and a fanatical devotion to the "O".

262 Tamron  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:25:01pm

Take an unsanctioned leak in the Oval Office, and you're done.

263 NYCHardhat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:25:17pm

re: #197 Amy

Oh please. How many people do I know in my line of business(Energy) that have Masters degree and have no idea what they are doing. The answer is alot. I respect higher education, but it doesn't mean you will be a good leader.

264 GeeWiz  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:25:51pm

re: #244 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

O'Ring. That's what the leak needs.

Nah, some plumber's putty should put an end to it. Where's Joe the plumber when you need him?

265 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:26:01pm

re: #262 Tamron

Take an unsanctioned leak in the Oval Office, and you're done.

Didn't Billy Carter pull that off successfully?

266 No Dhummi  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:26:06pm

re: #246 Creeping Eruption

But it sure makes neat, splashy headlines. /

Seems kinda late on in the game to be adopting ethical rules.

267 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:26:15pm

re: #248 wolfie

Bush gave up politics, but not governing. He (via staffers) complained because Obama & Co. were being jerks and compromising a private talk. It just is NOT done. Not even Clinton did that.

BTW, I think w/ any other president your suspicions would be warranted and are dang smart. Why assume it was Obama?
But in Bush's case, we're dealing with a dead horse.

I applaud your faith ion politicians. I lack any. I seriously doubt that Clinton did not leak private conversation if there was a benefit. Besides, don't get worked up about it. It was not meant as a slight against Bush. I consider leaking SOP in both parties.

268 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:26:19pm

re: #158 Opinionated

Don't get giddy.

These leaks where deliberate to pressure the current Administration.

It's not an indication that the Obama Administration will be undisciplined.

It's an indication that they will do anything to harm their enemies.

Exactly, and to them America is an enemy too.

269 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:26:56pm
270 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:27:53pm

re: #266 No Dhummi

Seems kinda late on in the game to be adopting ethical rules.

Ya think? Thats was what I found so humorous.

271 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:28:03pm

re: #242 SFGoth

If your ideal of Conservatism is William Jefferson Clinton, then citing anything is a futile attempt.

272 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:28:07pm

re: #263 NYCHardhat

Oh please. How many people do I know in my line of business(Energy) that have Masters degree and have no idea what they are doing. The answer is alot. I respect higher education, but it doesn't mean you will be a good leader.

Where did I say I thought he'd be a good leader? You're putting words in my mouth. I was simply stating that I think the man is smart, because another poster said he didn't think he was the "brightest star" or some such thing.

273 Soona'  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:28:10pm

re: #223 ErnieG

The leaks that I really fear are the ones that develop after Obama's people have gone through the White House files. I am sure that every White House has generated files of "graveyard" stuff that in the National Interest will not see the light of day for 20 to 50 years. They will be combing through this stuff looking for something they can use to justify a special counsel or a call to the New York Times, National Interest be damned.

I agree. The inquisition is coming. In true "Chicago-thug" form these people are not only going to go after Bush to destroy him, but they're going after the whole Republican party. That's the way they do things.
If it looks like it might hurt the country, then to hell with the country.

274 wolfie  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:28:17pm

re: #233 CofactorMatrix

If he were a "hillbilly" at heart, he would be a conservative.
We hillbillies didn't put the Zero in office.

275 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:28:17pm

re: #258 Silhouette

When anyone says "historic" around me, I ask them what is so historic about it.

Just to force them to say it.

They look afraid to voice it for a split-second, and then state it, sometimes couched with a lot of "...you knooow..."

That said: Yes, it's historic. And yes, that's principally because he's black (or "black" if you prefer, rather than getting into "biracial" or whatever). There's nothing wrong with pointing that out.

276 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:28:38pm

OT:

I know today is Veteran's Day, but many other good things happened today, as well. Washington State joined the union 119 years ago today, and 4 years ago today, the PLO confirmed Yassir Arafat was dead!

277 Throbert McGee  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:29:05pm

re: #172 winston06

He will be worse than Carter and Clinton. Trust me on that!

He definitely has the potential to make the phrase "to out-Carter Carter" part of the American lexicon.

278 Wishing  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:29:08pm

re: #265 Occasional Reader

Didn't Billy Carter pull that off successfully?

Speaking of relatives, this might be a most entertaining four years.

279 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:29:21pm

re: #276 gmsc

OT:

I know today is Veteran's Day, but many other good things happened today, as well. Washington State joined the union 119 years ago today, and 4 years ago today, the PLO confirmed Yassir Arafat was dead!

Too bad we can't get the same thing about Uncle Fidel.

280 Silhouette  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:29:23pm

re: #264 GeeWiz

Nah, some plumber's putty should put an end to it. Where's Joe the plumber when you need him?

Busy.

By amazing coincidence, he is being audited by the IRS, was randomly selected for drug testing, had his HS English teacher call about a possibility that he didn't finish one assignment so his diploma is on hold, has fielded calls about his expired hunting license, got a surprise visit from child services, and was randomly selected by the NSA for a full body search - and he was only driving by the airport.

281 NYCHardhat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:29:32pm

re: #272 Amy

Well, I don't think he is smart. Opportunist? Yes. Lucky? Very.

282 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:29:57pm

Speaking of Leaks. Secret Service has "released" the codenames for the Obama family.

He's Renegade.
She's Rennaissance.
The kids are Radiance and Rosebud.

Biden is Celtic.

WTF? What good are having code names if... screw it.

283 No Dhummi  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:30:06pm

re: #270 Creeping Eruption

Ya think? Thats was what I found so humorous.

Oh, I thought the humour was that they're actually under the impression that they possess ethical rules.

284 Walter Cronanty  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:30:09pm

re: #250 looking closely
Look at his record [if you can find it]. Look at how he won his seat in the Illinois Senate. Look at how he won his seat in the US Senate. Look at how he kicked reporters off of his plane. No, this is no "transparent" presidency. This is one ruthless politician - left-wing no doubt, but ruthless. And I'm sure he'll surround himself with only those who give him complete loyalty. You'll never see leaks like you did with W. Of course, W had an entrenched bureaucracy that was at odds with his policies, which didn't help. But I cannot believe that his Whitehouse will have near the problems that W had.

285 Creeping Eruption  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:30:22pm

re: #283 No Dhummi

Oh, I thought the humour was that they're actually under the impression that they possess ethical rules.

That too

286 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:30:38pm

re: #280 Silhouette

Busy.

By amazing coincidence, he is being audited by the IRS, was randomly selected for drug testing, had his HS English teacher call about a possibility that he didn't finish one assignment so his diploma is on hold, has fielded calls about his expired hunting license, got a surprise visit from child services, and was randomly selected by the NSA for a full body search - and he was only driving by the airport.

Also, his draft notice arrived in the mail yesterday... weird.

287 ErnieG  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:30:56pm

re: #276 gmsc

OT:

I know today is Veteran's Day, but many other good things happened today, as well. Washington State joined the union 119 years ago today, and 4 years ago today, the PLO confirmed Yassir Arafat was dead!

And like Generalissimo Franco, he's still dead.

288 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:31:18pm

re: #282 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Speaking of Leaks. Secret Service has "released" the codenames for the Obama family.

He's Renegade.
She's Rennaissance.
The kids are Radiance and Rosebud.

Biden is Celtic.

WTF? What good are having code names if... screw it.


Don't get me started. I was carping about that just the other day here.

289 NYCHardhat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:31:30pm

re: #282 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

This reminds me a reality based tv show. The main character is POTUS and...nevermind.

290 gmsc  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:31:30pm

re: #282 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Speaking of Leaks. Secret Service has "released" the codenames for the Obama family.

He's Renegade.
She's Rennaissance.
The kids are Radiance and Rosebud.

Biden is Celtic.

WTF? What good are having code names if... screw it.

Will someone remind the SS what happens to Rosebud at the end of Citizen Kane?

291 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:31:54pm

re: #205 looking closely

Its not up to them to let him do anything.

He's the POTUS (or soon to be), and THEY serve at HIS pleasure, not the other way around.

Again, if I were Obama, I'd find the leaker and accept their "resignation". (That is, presuming he didn't authorize the leak).

I doubt any heads will roll even if he knew the source of the leak. I guess you can tell I think he did authorize the leak. His staff is effectively using the leak to make him look good is what I'm gathering from the MSM coverage. Andrea Mitchell comes to mind.

292 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:32:11pm

re: #288 Occasional Reader

Don't get me started. I was carping about that just the other day here.

You had heard about that already?

293 turn  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:32:18pm

Take care all, time to go walk the black lab along the American.

294 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:32:21pm

re: #282 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

The kids are Radiance and Rosebud.

Guarding "Rosebud" may prove to be heavy sledding.

295 CofactorMatrix  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:32:40pm

re: #274 wolfie

Touche. I knew I'd screwed that up the second I hit submit. Please accept my apologies; that was a poor choice of words.

"Hemorrhoid". I knew it was an "H" word.

296 Occasional Reader  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:32:47pm

re: #292 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

You had heard about that already?

Well, yes. Here. I haven't seen any other source yet, though.

297 GeeWiz  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:33:07pm

re: #280 Silhouette

By amazing coincidence, he is being audited by the IRS, was randomly selected for drug testing, had his HS English teacher call about a possibility that he didn't finish one assignment so his diploma is on hold, has fielded calls about his expired hunting license, got a surprise visit from child services, and was randomly selected by the NSA for a full body search - and he was only driving by the airport.

Ah, the power of the Chicago political machine at work when one proves to be a problem for them. Shades of things to come?

298 [deleted]  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:33:08pm
299 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:33:12pm

re: #187 Gretchen

Well it could be a leak, five-year olds have trouble keeping secrets to themselves - telling secrets make them feel important.

It could also be made up to make Bush look bad (shocking I know) and force his hand on UAW bail outs.

Either way it ain't pretty, or surprising.

It could also backfire on him.

If Bush gets his back up and says "Not on my watch," what's O gonna do? Bush has less than two months left in office and absolutely nothing to lose. He could very well stonewall everything that the Dems do.

Returning the favor, if you will.

300 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:33:33pm

re: #294 Occasional Reader

Guarding "Rosebud" may prove to be heavy sledding.

And if they don't succeed, their careers will be on the skids.

301 Soona'  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:34:03pm

re: #275 Occasional Reader

That said: Yes, it's historic. And yes, that's principally because he's black (or "black" if you prefer, rather than getting into "biracial" or whatever). There's nothing wrong with pointing that out.

Racist! (We might as well get used to it)
/

302 unrealizedviewpoint  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:34:06pm

re: #282 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Speaking of Leaks. Secret Service has "released" the codenames for the Obama family.

He's Renegade.
She's Rennaissance.
The kids are Radiance and Rosebud.

Biden is Celtic.

Dictionary results for: Renegade

1. a person who deserts a party or cause for another.
2. an apostate from a religious faith.
–adjective
3. of or like a renegade; traitorous.

Who decides these codenames?

303 opnion  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:34:07pm

re: #281 NYCHardhat

Well, I don't think he is smart. Opportunist? Yes. Lucky? Very.

I would still like to know how Obama was Law Review President at Harvard & never submitted an article.
It has to be one of two things, either Barry is an empty suit who got the position as something of a minority set aside, or he sumitted articles that were so radical that it was necessary to destroy any evidence.
I vote the latter

304 unclassifiable  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:34:25pm

I know I am getting into deep waters here but...

...besides the usual global pitfalls of a poor chief executive -- Obama has the potential of making difficult for the next African- American or any other minority to run for the Presidency.

I hate that thought but the fact that something as shallow as "Hope and Change" or (paraphrase) "I don't look like anyone you see on money" or (paraphase) "I have a funny name" carried the day with a large segment of voters indicates to me that they would just as rapidly turn on all concerned if things do not work out in his administration.

I am very torn here. He has to succeed but his policies don't indicate he will. As a lizard and a citizen I cannot be concerned with such things when it comes to supporting or opposing his policies. Still these nagging thoughts are at the back of my mind.

305 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:34:53pm

re: #191 Creeping Eruption

Lets try again: Obama Transition Team adopts Ethical standards

Whatever they were on when they wrote that, I want some.

306 Tamron  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:35:08pm

re: #223 ErnieG

The leaks that I really fear are the ones that develop after Obama's people have gone through the White House files. I am sure that every White House has generated files of "graveyard" stuff that in the National Interest will not see the light of day for 20 to 50 years. They will be combing through this stuff looking for something they can use to justify a special counsel or a call to the New York Times, National Interest be damned.


I wonder how much shredder activity there is in the White House these days?
.

307 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:35:16pm

I wonder what McCain's codename might have been?

308 NYCHardhat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:35:28pm

re: #303 opnion

How about both?

309 Dave the.....  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:35:44pm
OK, but none of the psychological stuff relates to his intelligence.
Law students don't get to be the editor of the Harvard Law Review without having something on the ball. And I believe he graduated from Harvard Law cum laude. You can dismiss that if you wish, but I think it shows that the guy has smarts. No experience, no character, but smarts.

Agree. His problem is the world he has spent his entire life in. He's never been in a middle income family struggling to keep their small business going. He hasn't had best friends who are in the military. He's never run a self-funded organization. And he's never lived in a small town that the ACLU has target for lawsuits.

310 mich-again  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:36:19pm

Here's how you fix a leak. You hire the experts.

311 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:36:35pm

re: #193 Buck

Charles... A suggestion for the Comments box... A Cancel button. I often start a comment, but think better of it...

::shrugs:: I don't think he needs to do that.

Just click, drag, and delete. That's what I do.

312 infidel Alan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:36:44pm

In the Washington Post:

White House Denies Bush Pushed for Trade Agreement in Meeting With Obama

"The president did not suggest a quid pro quo" during his meeting Monday with President-elect Barack Obama, White House press secretary Dana Perino told reporters traveling with Bush."

313 opnion  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:37:00pm

re: #308 NYCHardhat

How about both?

Could be.

314 bulwrk  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:37:20pm

re: #290 gmsc


Will someone remind the SS what happens to Rosebud at the end of Citizen Kane?


USSS, SS has bad connotations

315 Killian Bundy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:37:31pm

But he can keep secrets if it helps him.

Hamas says met Obama advisors in Gaza

Ahmad Yousuf, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh's political advisor, said that during the recent US presidential race a secret meeting between senior Islamist group figures and advisors to President-elect Barack Obama was held in Gaza.

"We were in contact with a number of Obama's aides through the Internet, and later met with some of them in Gaza, but they advised us not to come out with any statements, as they may have a negative effect on his election campaign and be used by Republican candidate John McCain (to attack Obama)," Yousuf said in an interview with London-based Arabic-language newspaper Al-Hayat, published Tuesday

/surprise, surprise!

316 Defogger  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:37:44pm

re: #306 Tamron

I wonder how much shredder activity there is in the White House these days?
.

I don't know, but I'll venture a guess that the activity has stepped up some in the last 24 hours.

317 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:38:13pm

re: #303 opnion

I would still like to know how Obama was Law Review President at Harvard & never submitted an article.
It has to be one of two things, either Barry is an empty suit who got the position as something of a minority set aside, or he sumitted articles that were so radical that it was necessary to destroy any evidence.
I vote the latter

You don't get to be editor of the HLR as a "minority set aside." It's a highly competitive position which is awarded based on the quality of the student's writing. I believe that he was the first black editor, and I read that Lawrence Tribe considered him one of the finest minds he had encountered at HLS in a decade.

It's not unusual for the editor not to submit articles; it's his job to solicit articles from others and edit them, which in itself is a big job.

Look, I don't like the man or what he believes in, but there is no reason to attack his intelligence when there are so many other aspects of his prospective "rule" to be worried about.

318 Steffan  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:39:09pm

re: #201 eschew_obfuscation

NO! WWtW! MY POTPIE...Mom, WWtW is being a dildoe!

Sounds like WWtW is gonna get tuna tonight...

319 NYCHardhat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:39:18pm

re: #309 Dave the...


I don't know...My company works basically like this. You rise to the level of your incompetence. When people start telling me who is dumb and who is smart, I just cringe.

320 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:39:36pm
321 NYCHardhat  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:41:22pm

re: #317 Amy

I agree with not attacking ones intelligence. How will we fix the damage done to George for the last 8 years?

322 Dave the.....  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:41:24pm

My point wasn't his intelligence. But it's his life experiences that are Obama's problem. He has no idea what it's like to be a regular American. Hence why he sees 50% of members of various victim groups, and the other 50% as the enemy.

323 CascadeMermaid  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:42:12pm

re: #317 Amy

You don't get to be editor of the HLR as a "minority set aside." It's a highly competitive position which is awarded based on the quality of the student's writing. I believe that he was the first black editor, and I read that Lawrence Tribe considered him one of the finest minds he had encountered at HLS in a decade.

It's not unusual for the editor not to submit articles; it's his job to solicit articles from others and edit them, which in itself is a big job.

Look, I don't like the man or what he believes in, but there is no reason to attack his intelligence when there are so many other aspects of his prospective "rule" to be worried about.

Respectfully, I'm not certain that you are correct. From Wikipedia:
Using a competitive process that takes into account first-year grades, an editing exercise, and a written commentary on a court decision, The Harvard Law Review selects between 41 and 43 editors annually from the second-year Law School class, which numbers 560.

"Two editors from each of first-year class's seven sections (fourteen in all) are selected half by their first year grades and half by their scores on the writing competition. Another twenty are selected solely on their scores on the writing competition. The other seven to nine are selected by a discretionary committee, either to fulfill the review's race-based affirmative action program, to select students who just missed the cut by either of the other two processes, or by some other criteria as the committee sees fit."

Also, I believe that the president of the Law Review is elected. This was, I believe his first election campaign.
(Ref: [Link: query.nytimes.com...]

324 Buck  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:42:47pm

I wonder how Rahm Emanuel is really playing on Kos and Huff?

I mean the anti semite conspiracy nuts must be going crazy.

Even back in 2006 the daily Kosnuts were providing laughs.

325 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:43:32pm

re: #321 NYCHardhat

I agree with not attacking ones intelligence. How will we fix the damage done to George for the last 8 years?

Absolutely agreed. The meanspirited and vicious attacks on Bush were false, inexcusable and diminished the dignity of the Office. However, I have no intention of sinking to the LLL's level.

326 Mark1957  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:45:35pm

Leaks? Obama doesn't need to worry about his enemies leaking secrets. He needs to worry about his "friends"...

(Hillary Clinton, brooding in her secret underground lair):

Obama, you don't understand. You'll never get that second term. The presidency is perfect for you, it'll make you a big star, and I'm gonna you out of the business - and let me tell you why: Mr. Hope & Change ruined one of the Democratic Party's most valuable proteges. Me! For three years I was working the rubber chicken circuit - I took singing lessons, dancing lessons, acting lessons. I raised and spent millions of dollars. I was gonna be a big star! And let me be even more frank, just to show you that I'm not a hard-hearted bitch, and that it's not all dollars and cents: I was beautiful; I was innocent. Okay, I wasn't either beautiful or innocent, but I was still the greatest piece of ass the Donks ever had, and Bubba's had it all over the world. And then Barack Obama comes along with his olive oil voice and post-racial charm, and my party runs off with him. My party threw it all away just to make me look ridiculous! And a woman in my position can't afford to be made to look ridiculous! Now, Obama, you get the hell out of my White House. And you tell that Chicago goombah Axelrod that if he wants to try any rough stuff that I ain't no John Edwards! Yeah, I heard that story!"

327 tompaineftw  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:46:55pm

Speaking of leaks; remeber this doozy?

328 Kulhwch  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:47:18pm

Hey Barry!  STFU!

}:/     [ -- Your Boss (The American People).]

329 calcajun  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:49:10pm

re: #204 CIA Reject

I'm sure that after the election the WAB is insufferable, even for BO.

Heh!

I think she has a long reach than he does.

330 Tamron  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:49:48pm

re: #315 Killian Bundy

But he can keep secrets if it helps him.

Ahmad Yousuf, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh's political advisor, said that during the recent US presidential race a secret meeting between senior Islamist group figures and advisors to President-elect Barack Obama was held in Gaza.

"We were in contact with a number of Obama's aides through the Internet, and later met with some of them in Gaza, but they advised us not to come out with any statements, as they may have a negative effect on his election campaign and be used by Republican candidate John McCain (to attack Obama)," Yousuf said in an interview with London-based Arabic-language newspaper Al-Hayat, published Tuesday

Hamas says met Obama advisors in Gaza

/surprise, surprise!


It's a safe bet that Rahm Israel Emanuel wasn't one of the aides cutting a deal with Hamas.
.

331 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:50:15pm

re: #323 CascadeMermaid

Respectfully, I'm not certain that you are correct. From Wikipedia:
Using a competitive process that takes into account first-year grades, an editing exercise, and a written commentary on a court decision, The Harvard Law Review selects between 41 and 43 editors annually from the second-year Law School class, which numbers 560.

"Two editors from each of first-year class's seven sections (fourteen in all) are selected half by their first year grades and half by their scores on the writing competition. Another twenty are selected solely on their scores on the writing competition. The other seven to nine are selected by a discretionary committee, either to fulfill the review's race-based affirmative action program, to select students who just missed the cut by either of the other two processes, or by some other criteria as the committee sees fit."

Also, I believe that the president of the Law Review is elected. This was, I believe his first election campaign.
(Ref: [Link: query.nytimes.com...]

Note that the Wiki article states:

This article needs additional citations for verification.


There are no citations provided for what you quoted. I'd prefer a more authoritative source than Wikipedia.

The NYT article doesn't come up for me. If it did for you, can you block the relevant passage(s) for me?

332 SFGoth  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:52:10pm

re: #253 Pullus Iulius

Expect a tidal wave of leaks to be coming out of the Ö administration. This is largely Amateur Hour for narcissists. And the only pros it will have will be the professional criminals.

Hey, how 'bout some attribution for that umlauted O! ;-> j/k

333 SFGoth  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:55:32pm

re: #255 Amy

OK, but none of the psychological stuff relates to his intelligence.
Law students don't get to be the editor of the Harvard Law Review without having something on the ball. And I believe he graduated from Harvard Law cum laude. You can dismiss that if you wish, but I think it shows that the guy has smarts. No experience, no character, but smarts.

Some of the dumbest classmates of mine at Boston U. SoL ('95) were the Ivy League undergrads. When you unraveled their stream of consciousness gobbledygook, there was nothing there. No common sense either. It wasn't a rule, but a pretty good generality. Perhaps it was that these were the ones for whom BU was a safety school.

334 so.cal.swede  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:56:22pm

re: #63 ssn697

Obama's campaign was very light on leaks. I'm not buying the "leakiest ever" stuff.

They are going to "leak" when it suits them. Oh, and oops, we only leak information about opponents, rivals, dissenters, and republican bloggers ...

335 CascadeMermaid  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:57:24pm

re: #331 Amy

There are no citations provided for what you quoted. I'd prefer a more authoritative source than Wikipedia.

The NYT article doesn't come up for me. If it did for you, can you block the relevant passage(s) for me?

First Black Elected to Head Harvard's Law Review

By FOX BUTTERFIELD, SPECIAL TO THE NEW YORK TIMES
Published: February 6, 1990

LEAD: The Harvard Law Review, generally considered the most prestigious in the country, elected the first black president in its 104-year history today. The job is considered the highest student position at Harvard Law School.

The Harvard Law Review, generally considered the most prestigious in the country, elected the first black president in its 104-year history today. The job is considered the highest student position at Harvard Law School.

The new president of the Review is Barack Obama, a 28-year-old graduate of Columbia University who spent four years heading a community development program for poor blacks on Chicago's South Side before enrolling in law school. His late father, Barack Obama, was a finance minister in Kenya and his mother, Ann Dunham, is an American anthropologist now doing fieldwork in Indonesia. Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii.

''The fact that I've been elected shows a lot of progress,'' Mr. Obama said today in an interview. ''It's encouraging.

''But it's important that stories like mine aren't used to say that everything is O.K. for blacks. You have to remember that for every one of me, there are hundreds or thousands of black students with at least equal talent who don't get a chance,'' he said, alluding to poverty or growing up in a drug environment.

As to Wikipedia, I'll look for other citations, but it is well understood that a percentage of all positions at Harvard have minority set asides. I have relatives who have graduated from Harvard who confirm this routinely. It is an ongoing issue.

336 SFGoth  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:57:35pm

re: #271 FurryOldGuyJeans

If your ideal of Conservatism is William Jefferson Clinton, then citing anything is a futile attempt.

When the hell did I say he was my idea of Conservatism? Newt wrapped his hands around Bill's yahoo and said "scream welfare reform". Clinton was also forced into capital gains tax cuts. What Conservatism did either Bush give us, other than Bush II's tax cuts?

337 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:58:34pm

re: #333 SFGoth

Some of the dumbest classmates of mine at Boston U. SoL ('95) were the Ivy League undergrads. When you unraveled their stream of consciousness gobbledygook, there was nothing there. No common sense either. It wasn't a rule, but a pretty good generality. Perhaps it was that these were the ones for whom BU was a safety school.

Perhaps. BU isn't Harvard, and no, I didn't go to Harvard, either. I went to Rutgers and got a fine legal education there IMHO.

338 No Dhummi  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 2:58:57pm

re: #331 Amy

There are no citations provided for what you quoted. I'd prefer a more authoritative source than Wikipedia.

The NYT article doesn't come up for me. If it did for you, can you block the relevant passage(s) for me?

How about this reference?

339 CascadeMermaid  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:04:31pm

re: #338 No Dhummi

Thanks, very useful citation.

340 CascadeMermaid  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:06:28pm

Look, he is obviously very, very intelligent. But it is also obvious that race has played a part in almost every one of his achievements.

341 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:07:46pm

re: #335 CascadeMermaid

As to Wikipedia, I'll look for other citations, but it is well understood that a percentage of all positions at Harvard have minority set asides. I have relatives who have graduated from Harvard who confirm this routinely. It is an ongoing issue.

Thanks for the article. Since all of the editors of the LR have an interest in preserving the Review's well-deserved reputation for excellence and making the Reviews issued under their watch as good as possible, I don't think the other editors would have elected someone who they didn't think was qualified for the job.

As for the minority set-asides, which other student positions are you referring to? I also have a number of relatives who went to Harvard, and they have never mentioned this issue to me.

Even if it's true that some LR editor jobs are awarded as minority set-asides, which I am not yet conceding, there is no evidence that that is how Obama was chosen. And I don't think that cum laude degrees are awarded based on affirmative action.

342 CascadeMermaid  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:09:38pm

re: #341 Amy

Thanks for the article. Since all of the editors of the LR have an interest in preserving the Review's well-deserved reputation for excellence and making the Reviews issued under their watch as good as possible, I don't think the other editors would have elected someone who they didn't think was qualified for the job.

As for the minority set-asides, which other student positions are you referring to? I also have a number of relatives who went to Harvard, and they have never mentioned this issue to me.

Even if it's true that some LR editor jobs are awarded as minority set-asides, which I am not yet conceding, there is no evidence that that is how Obama was chosen. And I don't think that cum laude degrees are awarded based on affirmative action.

I'm not trying to be argumentative. But to ignore that fact that he has used race in a very effective manner to bolster his many talents is to ignore the obvious.

343 No Dhummi  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:11:06pm

re: #341 Amy


Even if it's true that some LR editor jobs are awarded as minority set-asides, which I am not yet conceding...

How can you not concede it? The reference I gave proves it.

344 firedupengineer  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:14:15pm

For the latest leaks - tune in to Oprah...

345 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:14:18pm

re: #338 No Dhummi

How about this reference?

That is actually very useful. Thank you. It says in relevant part:

Within a month, and in light of the concerns expressed by faculty and alumni, the Review voted to postpone the implementation of its affirmative action program if the faculty would accept the general concept behind the policy—something the faculty eventually did.

Mark B. Helm ’78, the Review president at the time, recalls: “The faculty didn’t necessarily agree with the direction we were heading, but the collision course that it seemed like we were on was avoided. We were not especially keen to provoke a fight with the faculty but we weren’t willing to abandon our plans either.”

The following year, the Review adopted an affirmative action policy that allowed the editors to consider race in selecting its new members.

What this says to me is that there are no "minority set-asides." In other words, the faculty and alums were not willing to accept a quota for minorities. The policy is that race can be "considered" as one factor among others, such as grades and writing samples, in choosing editors. That's a very different situation from a "set-aside."

346 firedupengineer  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:15:52pm

...carefully, strategically, selected leaks, that is...

347 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:16:32pm

re: #342 CascadeMermaid

I'm not trying to be argumentative. But to ignore that fact that he has used race in a very effective manner to bolster his many talents is to ignore the obvious.

Oh, I certainly do concede that. The only issue I was addressing was the unfounded attacks on his intelligence.

348 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:19:02pm

re: #255 Amy

OK, but none of the psychological stuff relates to his intelligence.
Law students don't get to be the editor of the Harvard Law Review without having something on the ball. And I believe he graduated from Harvard Law cum laude. You can dismiss that if you wish, but I think it shows that the guy has smarts. No experience, no character, but smarts.

You didn't read the stuff above the psych stuff? Derbyshire agrees that someone who graduated from Columbia and from Harvard Law must be smart. (Though you must be familiar with people who substituted hard work, interpersonal skills or both for intelligence when advancing themselves, yes?)

349 Spare O'Lake  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:19:53pm

re: #347 Amy

Oh, I certainly do concede that. The only issue I was addressing was the unfounded attacks on his intelligence.

'scuse me while I kiss this guy

350 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:20:57pm

And btw, CascadeMermaid, there's nothing wrong with being argumentative when you've got a valid point to defend. That's how I make my living, after all...
;)

Thank you for the conversation - I enjoyed it!

351 No Dhummi  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:23:37pm

re: #345 Amy

What this says to me is that there are no "minority set-asides." In other words, the faculty and alums were not willing to accept a quota for minorities. The policy is that race can be "considered" as one factor among others, such as grades and writing samples, in choosing editors. That's a very different situation from a "set-aside."

The last few sentences say that there are 14 spots for grades/writing competition, 20 for writing competition alone, and 7-9 spots set aside that are not judged on these merits, but instead can be used for Harvard's Affirmative Action Program.

Sounds like a set-aside to me.

352 CascadeMermaid  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:23:59pm

re: #350 Amy

And btw, CascadeMermaid, there's nothing wrong with being argumentative when you've got a valid point to defend. That's how I make my living, after all...
;)

Thank you for the conversation - I enjoyed it!

You are most welcome...pleasure doing business with you. :)

353 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:26:32pm

re: #348 stuiec

You didn't read the stuff above the psych stuff? Derbyshire agrees that someone who graduated from Columbia and from Harvard Law must be smart. (Though you must be familiar with people who substituted hard work, interpersonal skills or both for intelligence when advancing themselves, yes?)

I read the whole thing. I was simply remarking that the psychological stuff that you chose to include was irrelevant to the issue. Yes, hard work and interpersonal skills can help, but I disagree that they can "substitute" for intelligence when it comes to acing law school exams and writing well enough to earn a spot as an editor of a prestigious law review.

354 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:31:25pm

re: #351 No Dhummi

The last few sentences say that there are 14 spots for grades/writing competition, 20 for writing competition alone, and 7-9 spots set aside that are not judged on these merits, but instead can be used for Harvard's Affirmative Action Program.

Sounds like a set-aside to me.

Please re-read my #345. The article you linked to says that race can be "considered" by the editors. If you don't know the difference between considering race as a factor and instituting a set-aside (i.e., a quota), then I don't know what else I can say. There have been a lot of court cases based on exactly this distinction, with quotas being struck down but consideration of race as one factor among many in admissions (such as geographical distribution, alumni legacy status, athletic ability, etc.) being acceptable.

355 Amy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:33:21pm

I've gotta go, folks.

Thanks to everybody for a good conversation. I'll catch you on the flip side.

356 Killer Tomato  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:44:50pm

re: #307 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I wonder what McCain's codename might have been?

Renegade & Renaissance - Obamas
Celtic & Capri - Bidens
Phoenix & Parisoli - McCains
Denali & Driller - Palins

357 stuiec  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:46:08pm

re: #353 Amy

I read the whole thing. I was simply remarking that the psychological stuff that you chose to include was irrelevant to the issue. Yes, hard work and interpersonal skills can help, but I disagree that they can "substitute" for intelligence when it comes to acing law school exams and writing well enough to earn a spot as an editor of a prestigious law review.

Not that you're here to read this...

... but "writing well enough"? Why is it that Obama didn't write any articles under his byline while the editor of the Law Review? The closest anyone has come to attributing an article to Obama is a defense of abortion rights that doesn't carry a byline.

Also, where were Obama's LSAT scores published? Are you quite sure he aced them?

As for the psychological characteristics, I included those because they are interesting. They don't speak to Obama's intelligence one way or another.

358 LeePro  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:53:30pm

re: #332 SFGoth

Hey, how 'bout some attribution for that umlauted O! ;-> j/k

Link just below the comment box. Compliments, Charles.

359 I heart the USA  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 3:56:28pm

re: #233 CofactorMatrix

Classless, boorish. Clearly a thug, a lightweight, and a complete jerk. In my day, we called this kind of person an "asshole".

If this guy doesn't even have enough class, brains or poise to recognize that you don't go blabbing private conversations with anybody much less the President of the United States, what the hell else does he not know about common courtesy, etiquette and professional protocol? He may have been an affirmative-action attendee at a fancy school, but at heart he's a hillbilly, and a boor.

You know, you've really crossed the line with these comments.
Hillbillies are among the most patriotic of us. Apologize immediately for the insult. ;-)

360 I heart the USA  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 4:03:04pm

re: #110 SixDegrees

I think there are two reasons for this. One is simple thuggery from a man unwilling to wait two months to take office. He wants to be President now, not in January. This seems to be a major character trait/flaw that's been exhibited throughout his career - when he can't get something done what he wants immediately, he starts getting frustrated and the backbiting begins...

Fixed! :-)

361 Throbert McGee  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 4:04:33pm

re: #298 buzzsawmonkey

Probably better not mention to them that "Rosebud" was a highly sexual term of endearment which William Randolph Hearst addressed to Marion Davies.

In certain gay fetishist circles, "rosebud" is a term for, um, the thingamajig on display in that goatse.cx picture. (This is one of the many reasons that I avoid hanging out in gay fetishist circles.)

Attention, readers! If you were just released from a sensory deprivation chamber buried two miles under the Antarctic glaciers where the government has been keeping you since the mid-'90s, and thus have no idea what I'm talking about, do not Google "goatse.cx" (assuming you know what "Googling" is).

362 larrysheldon  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 4:07:22pm

I'll bet Hamas and Armadinnerjacket and all of the folks Obama is talking to without preconditions (like "won't blab everything to the NYT") will really be likely to say something substantial.

I quit playing "make up the rules as we go along" games by the 2nd or 3rd grade.

363 mattm  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 4:10:41pm

re: #8 Silhouette

May I be the first to suggest a new Obama nickname?

The Sieve.

Firehose?

364 big L  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 4:15:07pm

GwB knew BArry was a leaker. So he said some twaddle about trade and auto manufacturers. GwB playing poker. "Look-over-here" and Obama did leak a private conversation.
So now GWB communicates that Obama is untrustworthy w/o saying it. The MSM fills the newscycle with story, because it looks like disrespect to GWB. But
Obie loses because he is unmasked as a fool not to be trusted, now communicated to the allies.

365 ciaospirit  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 4:49:43pm

re: #335 CascadeMermaid

''But it's important that stories like mine aren't used to say that everything is O.K. for blacks. You have to remember that for every one of me, there are hundreds or thousands of black students with at least equal talent who don't get a chance,'' he said, alluding to poverty or growing up in a drug environment

Same for poor whites, Hispanics, Asians. The focus needs to be off race and on financial status.

366 Biff  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 4:54:27pm

If he gave Obama some classified info, he should bust him if it leaks. No Executive Privilege yet.

367 Biff  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 5:02:22pm

re: #354 Amy

Amy, this is exactly what is wrong with the Law today. You can do exactly what you are not supposed to do just as long as you use the proper set of words to do it.

What this all means is that Obama not only got a pass into Columbia and HLS, but also onto the Law Review.

re: #351 No Dhummi

The last few sentences say that there are 14 spots for grades/writing competition, 20 for writing competition alone, and 7-9 spots set aside that are not judged on these merits, but instead can be used for Harvard's Affirmative Action Program.

Sounds like a set-aside to me.

Please re-read my #345. The article you linked to says that race can be "considered" by the editors. If you don't know the difference between considering race as a factor and instituting a set-aside (i.e., a quota), then I don't know what else I can say. There have been a lot of court cases based on exactly this distinction, with quotas being struck down but consideration of race as one factor among many in admissions (such as geographical distribution, alumni legacy status, athletic ability, etc.) being acceptable.

368 bungie  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 5:20:00pm

None of you have defined what you mean by "being smart." Do you mean someone with let's say a 115 IQ who after all is much smarter than the majority of human beings, since the greatest number of people have an IQ of 100 (the bell curve is set so that 100 is where the greatest number of people are at.)

Or are you talking about smart like 145 IQ, three standard deviations above the norm? Or are you talking about "smart" as in common sense, a la Joe the Plumber?

I think it is clear and well established that Obama was pushed along by a combination of affirmative action and connections to wealthy and influential people (also due to his race and politics.) His lack of real accomplishments corroborate this. I think he is articulate and smart but no "rocket scientist." Having been a law review editor in the mid-1970's, I can tell you that affirmative action has been around for a long time. And knowing a minority student who was good but not great in high school but just graduated cum laude from Harvard Law without any difficulty (he said it wasn't hard), I think you're all overly impressed with the brand.

369 Maui Girl  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 5:33:51pm

re: #317 Amy


Wasn't there an article about a glowing letter of recommendation from some highly influential Columbia professor that basically sewed up BO's position on the HLR?

370 Daisy  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 5:40:02pm

re: #47 spidly

they be leaky for a couple of months. then, you won't know what the hell they're up to.

anybody gotta remedy for raw lungs? guhhh. 3 day nyquil bender and associated hangover.

Gargle w/warm salt water. Spanish friend taught me this remedy drink hot milk w/honey and nutmeg. Both work well. Maybe the salt water and then the warm milk :)

371 Xango Annie  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 5:42:54pm

I swear I read this months ago..at least, the thing I am sure of is...I did not dream it..it was in regard to the process in which he was elected editor of HLR. It said there were multiple votes..or however, they do it..and the number 19 sticks in my mind..after that number he was elected.

372 MellyMel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 5:47:43pm

My reply to a friend moonbat on FB:

I guess I just don't see what has been so bad about the past 8 years. Bush was President, but other than that -- um, what? Yes 9/11, not his fault (unless you wear a tinfoil hat), gas prices which HE does not control and the housing crash (hence, the economy) -- which was all caused (and started in 1994 BTW) by Democrats trying to give people who could not afford them mortgages. Good idea, bad practice.

Now, we have Obama who promises a lot of things which frankly, do not seem realistic to me -- ergo neither does the hype surrounding him. My bottom line is that the President simply does not have control over everything that happens. And honestly, I am happy about that fact.

I am very curious to know what exactly about Bush's policies with which you had such an issue. Abortion is still legal, taxes were lowered, and we have not had another terrorist attack in 7 years. Really, what did he do to piss off so many people -- other than being a great scapegoat?

373 kansas  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 6:33:53pm

re: #3 MrSilverDragon

Loose lips sink ships, Obama... remember that.


Isn't that the fucking point? To sink the US?

374 Maui Girl  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 6:38:19pm

re: #370 Daisy


Lysine. Great for lung irritation.

375 kaymad  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 6:56:33pm

re: #169 Dave the...

Dmays


A supporter could say first time excitement. Detractors (like me) say he looks very amateurish. Could be a lot of on-the-job training for Obama and his crew.

And did we ever figure out what the "Office of President-Elect" is? Does he realize how stupid that looked? Doesn't he have a grown up to say "ummm, let's tone this down a bit"?

I was on the road and out of town all weekend so I missed the first press conference and all the coverage. Not to mention I've been avoiding the tube. Are you serious that he had Office of the President Elect on his...where? Not a name tag I hope! That's so lame. It's like we've elected the democrat version of Alex P. Keaton, but without the charm.

376 So?  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 7:26:30pm

Send in Joe The Plumber

377 poopeedoo  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 7:26:53pm

"Someone needs to learn to shut their pie hole", a top Bush source warned.

Fixed it.

378 Eclectic Infidel  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 7:39:23pm

The implication is that Obama TOLD his staffers to release said CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, correct?

So in order for Barak to maintain integrity, he ought to fire the ones who leaked the information to the press, right?
(with which I agree, btw)

379 Elcid  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 7:42:40pm
the Obama administration will probably be the leakiest White House in history.

What's the difference, bureaucratic idiots, usually Democrats did a damn good job "leaking" Bush policy they didn't agree with. Which was everything.

Although, one Republican "leaner" bearing a strong resembalance to Jabba the Hut, Richard Armitage, did a damn good job also.

380 Ledger1  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 9:53:10pm

re: #30 GeeWiz

Not a bozo but a shrewd crude Chicago political machinist.

There. I fix that for you.

381 Ledger1  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 10:01:59pm

re: #139 3 wood

By the way, the New York Times stock price set yet another 52 week low, closing at $8.38, a drop of 3.46% in one day. --3 wood

If you want to make some money on the NYT’s plunge then short the stock. If it goes below $5.00 it is a goner.

382 Miss Molly  Tue, Nov 11, 2008 11:17:22pm

This whole "leak" by Obama seems to me to be another slam at Bush by Obama because he must think by now he can do anything he wants and no one will hit back. I'm glad Bush hit back so quickly because it made Obama look really bad.

How long does anyone think the press will still be in the tank for him when they don't get their leaks.

383 Bullskin  Wed, Nov 12, 2008 12:45:09am

re: #19 docremulac

Obama's grasping on to the last chance to validate his job by bashing Bush.

Enjoy it while you can Obama, when Bush is gone it's just you against the world and all it's problems and guess how many of those problems you're going to be able to solve by bashing Bush? Zero.

He will spend next 4 years saying "it is the former government fault, not mine".
(And the twits who voted him will believe),

384 Blue Eyed Music Lover  Wed, Nov 12, 2008 3:44:09am

wonder how long they can keep the red diaper baby's girlfriend out of the news? Michelle, contact Hillary to find out which ashtrays are the most flingable.

385 Logic  Wed, Nov 12, 2008 4:17:30am

Great, that's just what we need... an incontinent president is matters of confidentiality. Maybe all that talk of "CHANGE" was really about diapers.

We are in deep doo-doo.

386 Daisy  Wed, Nov 12, 2008 3:00:45pm

re: #374 Maui Girl

Lysine. Great for lung irritation.

Later -- but yes. L Lysine. Also: The moment anything even begins to hint that it wants to grow up and become a cols sore, I begin taking L Lysine. It works.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

researchok
'I Was Looking Forward to a Quiet Old Age': Instead, Etta Shiber, Helped Smuggle Stranded Allied Soldiers To Freedom
5 hours, 25 minutes ago
Views: 69 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 0

Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
13 hours, 6 minutes ago
Views: 106 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

MikeySDCA
Colin Powell Endorsed Same-Sex Marriage Once It Was Safe, More Evidence He's Hardly a Great Leader.
13 hours, 10 minutes ago
Views: 137 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
13 hours, 59 minutes ago
Views: 124 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Michael McBacon
Kansas governor signs 'Shariah bill' to ban Islamic law
18 hours, 29 minutes ago
Views: 236 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
1 day, 18 hours ago
Views: 459 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 0 • Rating: -5

MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
1 day, 19 hours ago
Views: 229 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Ascher
Israeli Who Saved Turk on Everest: You Never Abandon a Friend - Israel News, Ynetnews
1 day, 21 hours ago
Views: 300 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 3

Haywood Jabloeme
The Harrassment of Patterico & Its Roots in Left-Wing Activism
1 day, 21 hours ago
Views: 524 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Curt
Brian Banks: (Video) Falsely accused of rape speaks out
1 day, 23 hours ago
Views: 275 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

 Frank says:

Life is like high school with money.