Friday Afternoon Open
Open | Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07:55 pm PST
You only punch yourself out when you start swinging blind.
— Devo
Show top rated links | LinkViewer
Open | Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07:55 pm PST
You only punch yourself out when you start swinging blind.
— Devo
617 comments
3![]() |
davinvalkri Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:08:56pm |
Too true, too true.
Wait...Devo is some kind of band, right?
5![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:09:48pm |
Fox says the British PM has asked for a global tax cut.
6![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:10:13pm |
Is anyone else happy that Obama is talking to The Hill-debeast about a position inside his administration? Personally, I think it'll be the end of her if she accepts.
7![]() |
MrSilverDragon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:10:23pm |
I always liked, "We're through being cool!"
Somehow seems appropriate for me!
8![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:10:32pm |
Hehe. Wow, I posted this to the wrong thread:
I seem to recall a lot of people on this forum refused to support Rudy in part because they suspected him of wanting to magically confiscate our guns. Now we have a Dem monopoly with a gun owner's worst nightmare in the White House.
Yep, we're all really gonna want to put our support behind the socons now, huh? Who knows what we can achieve in 2010 with that kind of brain-power?
9![]() |
sadhu Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:11:17pm |
STS 126 launch is at 6:55pm EST
[Link: ping.fm...]
10![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:12:04pm |
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
“It has started devouring our rich culture. Unless we can collectively stop it, the survival of our arts, sculptures, writings and dramas will be at stake.”
Large groups of Bangladeshi artists – including film-makers, singers and writers – began daily protests last month after authorities removed two newly commissioned sculptures of local folk singers erected outside Dhaka's airport.
A group of Muslim hardliners calling themselves the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee complained that the sculptures were idols, which are strictly forbidden in Islam, and threatened to attack the artwork with power tools.
Buoyed by their removal, hardline Islamists are now demanding that the government erect a minaret honouring Muslim pilgrims at the same airport site.
One of the group's leaders Mufti Fazlul Haq Amini, a former MP, says that he will “demolish all statues” if his party wins the December 18 parliamentary elections.
Heh.
13![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:13:16pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
Wow, even the hippies aren't safe from Muslim extremists? No way, man!
14![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:13:49pm |
re: #8 Salem
Yup, the silly GOP purity tests on abortion and gun control are killing us.
17![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:14:48pm |
boy am i in the mood to drink opening up another old resputin
18![]() |
Pvt Bin Jammin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:14:57pm |
re: #9 sadhu
STS 126 launch is at 6:55pm EST
[Link: ping.fm...]
Very cool kick-off for Air Force Week.
19![]() |
Max Darkside Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:14:57pm |
20![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:06pm |
Does anyone ever get the impression that it's over, the looters have won.
[Link: www.dallasnews.com...]
Dallas school district engaging in 'official' identify theft of SSN numbers to employ illegals ... to teach our children.
Why do we put up with this sh1t? And look at the bailout mess... its the same basic problem.
Is it beer o'clock yet?
21![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:36pm |
Well the market dropped like a rock at thee end and finished up down 337 tp close at 8,498
Given that the DOW was at about 9,600 the night of the election, that means the market has lost about 11 points or 11.5% since The Messiah got elected.
I know there are many factors involved, but I think Obama's election is part of it. The market is always a bet on the future, which now includes Obama and his big government ideas.
Say what you will about giving the President-elect the benefit of the doubt, so far the market does not like it.
22![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:46pm |
re: #16 yochanan
wife being a b'''h anyone what a wife?
No, thanks. Have one . . . and she's REALLY pregnant.
23![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:57pm |
wonder if we can go to alaska and start over ala ayn rand
24![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:16:04pm |
re: #8 Salem
I think the first thing conservatives need to do right now is to avoid labels like "RINO" and "socon." The definition of these words is slippery, and all we really know is that they are meant to be pejoratives.
25![]() |
Catttt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:16:18pm |
Freedom of choice is what you've got.
Freedom from choice is what you want.
27![]() |
unclassifiable Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:16:34pm |
DEVO
Now is their time because it's all going backwards...
Emotion over reason -- check
Fanaticism over deliberation -- check
Style over substance -- check
"We are all sitting down because after 10 years of dealing with promoters in this business it's the only way we can play without pain."
31![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:21pm |
re: #26 saberry0530
How Much for the women?
"The wife . . . your little girl . . . I want to buy them."
32![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:24pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners“It has started devouring our rich culture. Unless we can collectively stop it, the survival of our arts, sculptures, writings and dramas will be at stake.”
Large groups of Bangladeshi artists – including film-makers, singers and writers – began daily protests last month after authorities removed two newly commissioned sculptures of local folk singers erected outside Dhaka's airport.
A group of Muslim hardliners calling themselves the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee complained that the sculptures were idols, which are strictly forbidden in Islam, and threatened to attack the artwork with power tools.
Buoyed by their removal, hardline Islamists are now demanding that the government erect a minaret honouring Muslim pilgrims at the same airport site.
One of the group's leaders Mufti Fazlul Haq Amini, a former MP, says that he will “demolish all statues” if his party wins the December 18 parliamentary elections.
Oh, fer cryin' out loud!
Give in, and they feel empowered to demand more and more.
I hope some sanity comes back so that governments stop this giving in to the demands of those who are so very easily "offended" by anything.
33![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:26pm |
re: #16 yochanan
wife being a b'''h anyone what a wife?
Is the warranty still good? Maybe you can take her back for a refund.
36![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:56pm |
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
37![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:57pm |
re: #23 yochanan
You can get Penguin copies of Atlas Shrugged for about $8. I have given a few out. 'Course I really don't expect them to get read, but who knows.
40![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:00pm |
41![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:06pm |
42![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:46pm |
#21 3 Wood
If you're still around maybe you could shoot me an email. Galloping Granny thought that maybe it would be good for us to chat.
43![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:56pm |
44![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:19:02pm |
45![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:19:02pm |
re: #33 victor_yugo
jewish women you know they are the boss HELP
46![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:19:13pm |
re: #35 taxfreekiller
tfk knows what I'm talking about, I feel better.
47![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:20:04pm |
48![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:20:39pm |
re: #20 Harry Tuttle
Does anyone ever get the impression that it's over, the looters have won.
[Link: www.dallasnews.com...]
Dallas school district engaging in 'official' identify theft of SSN numbers to employ illegals ... to teach our children.
Why do we put up with this sh1t? And look at the bailout mess... its the same basic problem.
Is it beer o'clock yet?
I just talked to my brother-in-law about this, he lives in Dallas. Here's what he said about this Dallas Independent School District:
The DISD is derided by all that know as being a terribly run school district, virtually no one who can afford otherwise who lives in the DISD sends their children to public school there. More importantly, the DISD's administrators are constantly committing malfeasance and constantly being replaced. These people should go to prison for this, in my view.
49![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:20:54pm |
re: #47 Ben Hur
SHE ISN'T ISRAELI american born but help me anyway
50![]() |
BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:21:06pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
Isn't there a statue of limitations for those offenses?
/
51![]() |
subsailor68 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:21:17pm |
re: #16 yochanan
wife being a b'''h anyone what a wife?
Old joke:
Older man finally decides he's gonna buy that Corvette he's always wanted. Gets out onto the interstate and kicks it. He's doing well over 100 mph when he sees the Florida State Trooper's flashers in his mirror.
Pulls over, and the officer comes up to the car.
Officer says, "Look, it's Friday and my shift is almost over. Make ya a deal. You give me an excuse I haven't heard and I'll let it go.'
Older man: "Well officer, about ten years ago my wife ran off with a Florida State Trooper. I was just afraid he was tryin' to bring her back."
Officer: "Have a nice weekend sir."
52![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:21:18pm |
re: #14 Killgore Trout
Yup, the silly GOP purity tests on abortion and gun control are killing us.
Ironic how we seem to alternate between socon candidates and feeble duplicitous Senate fossils like Dole and McCain. I suppose Jindal will be a lock for the 2012 candidate if that cycle isn't broken.
53![]() |
Pullus Iulius Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:14pm |
re: #5 debutaunt
Fox says the British PM has asked for a global tax cut.
I can see all the other heads of state saying "Hmmm...Sounds like an idea. You go first, Mister Prime Minister."
54![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:16pm |
re: #21 3 wood
Given that the DOW was at about 9,600 the night of the election, that means the market has lost about 11 points or 11.5% since The Messiah got elected.
make that "has lost about 1100 points"
It's hard to work and blog at the same time.
55![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:29pm |
re: #36 turn
. . .
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
I have very strong feelings on all those issues, but I agree with you.
56![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:52pm |
re: #51 subsailor68
roflmao wifie did not thning that was funny
57![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:56pm |
re: #8 Salem
Man, I get so tired of shit about Rudy. The motherfucker didn't run for President. He expected to be coronated, and when that didn't happen, he went home.
58![]() |
jorline Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:23:10pm |
Kanye West says he's 'voice of this generation'
LONDON (AP) - Kanye West is to music what Michael Jordan was to basketball—at least that West thinks, in his humble estimation. "I realize that my place and position in history is that I will go down as the voice of this generation, of this decade, I will be the loudest voice," he said in an interview on Wednesday.
"It's me settling into that position of just really accepting that it's one thing to say you want to do it and it's another thing to really end up being like Michael Jordan."The Grammy-winning rapper-producer said Justin Timberlake had a chance to be music's MVP, but hasn't put out enough material. (Timberlake's last album was in 2006, while West released a CD last year and is releasing his latest—"808s and Heartbreak"—on Nov. 24.)
"There were people who had the potential to do it but they went on vacation, so when Justin went on vacation I made albums," he said. "And it just came out to be that."
West, 31, said life has been difficult since his mother's death. Donda West died last November after having plastic surgery.
"I'm just going through balancing that. And I always used to have that support system, you know. My mom would be there; no matter what, she was there before everything," he said. "We were together for like 30 years. And you know now when I'm on that stage and I look out and I say, 'What am I going to do with the rest of my life?' Like when does a real life start?' Because I have sacrificed real life to be a celebrity and to give this art to people, which is great. It is great that I was able to do that, I'm not trying to shun that in any way, but it's definitely a Catch-22 and it's bittersweet."
Anybody have a pin to pop this SOB's head?
59![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:23:11pm |
re: #36 turn
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
It was founded on both.
60![]() |
subsailor68 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:23:54pm |
61![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:03pm |
re: #58 jorline
Kanye West says he's 'voice of this generation'
Anybody have a pin to pop this SOB's head?
Kanye West doesn't care about white people.
62![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:24pm |
re: #26 saberry0530
How Much for the women?
Have you read Thomas Hardy's "The Mayor of Castorbridge"? So sad.
63![]() |
MrSilverDragon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:32pm |
64![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:46pm |
65![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:47pm |
beer me on my fourth old resputin at 9 % i guess i have to remember the iron fist rule
thank g-d shabos starts in less than a hour
67![]() |
joncelli Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:25:22pm |
re: #23 yochanan
Current conditions in Anchorage, AK. (Be careful what you wish for.)
68![]() |
Kenneth Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:25:31pm |
Taliban ♥ Obama!
“The overwhelming victory of Barrack Obama, the candidate of the Democrats in the US Presidential Election and his assumption of US presidency reveals the collective willingness of American people not to continue the current despicable and anti-human wars in Afghanistan and Iraq --- wars that have been launched by W. Bush. They do not want their children to be fodder of war flames any more. This war, which is the outcome of Bush’s belligerence and warmongering mindset, has resulted in failure both in Afghanistan and Iraq. It had neither a logical standing nor a legal footing to begin with. Despite the huge loss sustained in terms of military hardware and in terms of lives of thousands of US and its ally’s soldiers, it is now facing a historical defeat and disgrace. The USA is now grappling with an enormous and almost irreversible financial system crisis. Washington has lost its previous caliber in the world and its good name has been spoiled. Still more, the loathing and repugnance on the part of the public of the world is accumulating against it.As in contrast to Bush, Obama had promised that he would not follow Bush’s policy. He had pledged to recover the dwindling American economy and find a niche in the comity of nations. It is, therefore, imperative for Obama to put an end to all the policies being followed by his Opposition Party, the Republicans and pull out US troops from Afghanistan and Iraq forthwith. If Obama and the Democrats would like to follow into the steps of Bush and see their magnanimity in oppressing and subjugating nations and nurture the ambitions of prolonging the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, then it is clear that the fate of the Democrats will be even more shameful and despicable than the Republicans. They will not bring the ship of the downfall of USA safely to the coast of rescue and will not land it securely. It was because of this sky-high expenditure, which is now pushing America to the verge of penury and their economic institutions are melting down. Europe and the rest of the world are pondering to bring about changes in their financial relations with USA.
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan reminds the newly-elected leadership of USA that the presence of thousands of NATO and US forces in Afghanistan and the policy of intransigence and bellicose neither had any achievement nor brought about security and peace to the people of Afghanistan.”
69![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:03pm |
re: #52 Salem
Ironic how we seem to alternate between socon candidates and feeble duplicitous Senate fossils like Dole and McCain. I suppose Jindal will be a lock for the 2012 candidate if that cycle isn't broken.
Oh, goodness.
My take on Jindal: He makes a better appearance at being a good public executive, than he does doing the actual job of being a public executive.
Don't get me wrong - we here in La. are much better off with Jindal than with Blanco, he has done much right.
But boy howdy - there have been some major screw-ups too, that should not have happened.
70![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:13pm |
re: #49 yochanan
SHE ISN'T ISRAELI american born but help me anyway
Habibi, you got it easy.
Israeli chicks never let up.
71![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:20pm |
72![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:50pm |
74![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:23pm |
re: #65 yochanan
beer me on my fourth old resputin at 9 % i guess i have to remember the iron fist rule
thank g-d shabos starts in less than a hour
?
75![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:32pm |
re: #55 reine.de.tout
I have very strong feelings on all those issues, but I agree with you.
I see Salem and Kilgore are talking about the same thing. How can this be turned around in time to save the GOP's ass in two years?
76![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:34pm |
re: #58 jorline
He's "sacrificed real life" to be a "celebrity"?
LOLOLOLOL!
How stupid is that?
Being a celebrity IS real life, if that is what you have chosen AND if you have the talent for it.
All he has to do is take himself out of play, if he wants a "real life".
78![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:37pm |
re: #14 Killgore Trout
Yeah, if we were just more like the Democrats we'd win? You are never going to get to the Left of the Democrats, so if that's your plan for winning, you are always going to lose.
Always.
79![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:49pm |
re: #57 Iron Fist
Man, I get so tired of shit about Rudy. The motherfucker didn't run for President. He expected to be coronated, and when that didn't happen, he went home.
Thank you.
81![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:28:21pm |
re: #66 taxfreekiller
take a look in the mirror
looking for an easy out
blame the Republicansblame one group of Republicans
blame the leaders of the Republicans
blame the religious right of the Republicanswho blames who, and why and how
does that get votes, does that control
the prescient caucus after a primaryif you are there, if you get your group there
if you have a majority there, you will get a say
if you post here on lgf's and other blogs you
will be a well known poster, and you will have
those who agree with you here,the caucus room, the county convention, the state and national conventions, that is where the facts and votes count
like that
Dude you are like a character in an Ayn Rand book.
And as usual you are right.
82![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:28:34pm |
re: #77 yochanan
frumie jewish girlies don[t' either HELP
Well, it's a mitzvah to "have relations" on Friday night, so I suggest Black Label and Viagra.
83![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:28:54pm |
re: #78 Iron Fist
HOW MANY RUSPUTINS DO I HAVE TO HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE IRON FIST RULE?
HELP ME BROTHER
84![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:01pm |
re: #8 Salem
Hehe. Wow, I posted this to the wrong thread:
I seem to recall a lot of people on this forum refused to support Rudy in part because they suspected him of wanting to magically confiscate our guns. Now we have a Dem monopoly with a gun owner's worst nightmare in the White House.
Yep, we're all really gonna want to put our support behind the socons now, huh? Who knows what we can achieve in 2010 with that kind of brain-power?
Well, here is his proposals in his own words from the Change.gov (pre-deletion) site:
Address Gun Violence in Cities: As president, Barack Obama would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals who shouldn't have them. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent, as such weapons belong on foreign battlefields and not on our streets.
The repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment means anyone as possible access to gun purchase/ownership records. This permits the loons to file the frivilous lawsuits against gun manufacturers and owners. The amendments forbids the BATFE from releasing these records. The absence of said amendment did not prevent or even delay in any way, LEAs from accessing the data.
The gun show and childproof guns are merely smokescreens to make it harder to by/sell guns of an kind. Depending on the language used, no childproof lock would be adequate. What various governments have referred to as Assault Weapons is in itself a joke. I can almost understand the outlawing of automatic weapons. We all know how many murders and assaults have been committed with automatic weapons (/). As far as I am concerned the only difference between an Assault Rifle and a hunting rifle is appearance. That apparently counts for a lot to these metra-sexuals.
85![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:18pm |
re: #62 Daisy
Have you read Thomas Hardy's "The Mayor of Castorbridge"? So sad.
Long Long time ago..
It's a line from the Blue Brothers movie while they are trying to Put the band back together.
86![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:26pm |
re: #82 Ben Hur
Well, it's a mitzvah to "have relations" on Friday night, so I suggest Black Label and Viagra.
A true "cocktail." Sorry, that was crass.
87![]() |
dentate Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:53pm |
You only punch yourself out when you start swinging blind.— Devo
Can Charles quote Devo (= de-evolution) without upsetting creationists?
88![]() |
Kenneth Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:56pm |
Diplomats say the U.S. and key allies are objecting to an International Atomic Energy Agency offer to help Syria as it considers building a civilian nuclear power plant.
Party poopers!
90![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:30:18pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
The Buddhist statue debacle all over again from the tolerant religion of peace? Beauty.
91![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:30:20pm |
re: #83 yochanan
Man, that's a decision only you can make. Sometimes I can't even make it for myself :-)
94![]() |
noraono Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:31:08pm |
Today my company started a new wave of layoffs, only 3 let go today. One an 8 year employee, just a few years away from retirement. Another the bane of my existence. Our corp. has mandated 15% layoffs in the coming months.
My future is secure but it's going to be a tough 2009 for everyone. My prayers for everyone in the same boat.
96![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:31:09pm |
97![]() |
funky chicken Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:31:23pm |
re: #36 turn
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
Perhaps stressing federalism is a way to keep everybody in the big tent. The evangelicals really just became a dominant force in the GOP in the eighties/early nineties. They did it right, meaning they showed up in force at local offices and took over things from the grass roots level. They are extremely passionate about abortion and homosexuality, and are resistant to discussing that perhaps those issues should be dealt with at the local and/or state level...but perhaps many of them would be willing to consider the federalist argument. Fred Thompson would perhaps be a good choice to help convince them....I like Michael Steele very much, but in his interview on Hannity's radio show yesterday, he stressed abortion as on of the key pillars that the GOP should use to win back the majority.
Sorry, but he's wrong about that.....especially at the federal level. Even at the state level abortion bans seem to fail when put to the vote.
99![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:07pm |
100![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:17pm |
re: #42 jemima
#21 3 Wood
If you're still around maybe you could shoot me an email. Galloping Granny thought that maybe it would be good for us to chat.
I'm trying but so far you addy is not coming up. I'll keep trying.
101![]() |
dentate Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:20pm |
re: #82 Ben Hur
Well, it's a mitzvah to "have relations" on Friday night, so I suggest Black Label and Viagra.
Is Black Label kosher?
102![]() |
joncelli Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:25pm |
re: #83 yochanan
All caps and bold is a pretty good indicator that it's time to put down the keyboard. (That way you can drink two-fisted!)
103![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:27pm |
re: #78 Iron Fist
Yeah, if we were just more like the Democrats we'd win? You are never going to get to the Left of the Democrats, so if that's your plan for winning, you are always going to lose.
Always.
Agree 100%.
104![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:27pm |
re: #96 reine.de.tout
sorry i forgot the old internet caps rule FRANKLY I LIKE CAPS
105![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:34pm |
re: #85 saberry0530
Long Long time ago..
It's a line from the Blue Brothers movie while they are trying to Put the band back together.
Really? I'm off to Netflix (there was a copy of the BB in the house .. but where?) - be right back :)
106![]() |
Who Watches the Watchmen? Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:55pm |
I'm verklempt from all this hopenchanginess.
107![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:33:02pm |
re: #59 Soona'
It was founded on both.
I was reading some stuff about Lincoln earlier today, I'm no historian believe me. I read he struggled with the separation of the constitution and religion, with Calvinism. I'm not so sure the first GOP president believed it was, or should be, founded on both.
108![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:33:15pm |
re: #99 reine.de.tout
IRON FIST some how i don't think wifie would let me look up reine de tout
109![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:33:42pm |
re: #105 Daisy
Really? I'm off to Netflix (there was a copy of the BB in the house .. but where?) - be right back :)
Be on the lookout for the restaurant scene.
110![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:21pm |
re: #106 Who Watches the Watchmen?
I'm verklempt from all this hopenchanginess.
For someone that promises change from the status quo in D.C., why in the world is he hiring all them old Clinton strap hangers?
111![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:25pm |
re: #42 jemima
It keeps telling me that your name cannot be matched with a name on the address list.
112![]() |
Kenneth Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:32pm |
Stupid fat-assed snaggle-toothed loser mouthing off again,
Iraq's al-Sadr renews threats to attack US
Too bad the twerp is in Iran hiding behind the mullahs' skirts while his fighters back in Iraq have been decimated.
114![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:45pm |
remember jewish women are the real bosses. i think sometimes they don't even know it. HELP ME BROTHERS.
115![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:51pm |
re: #95 taxfreekiller
We need to find some tea to dump into a harbor somewhere.
No taxation without representation!
116![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:35:20pm |
A nice story for a drinking thread:
A teacher gave her fifth grade class an assignment. Get their parents to tell them a story with a moral at the end of it. The next day the kids came back and one by one began to tell their stories.
'Tony, do you have a story to share?'
'Yes ma'am. My daddy told a story about my Aunt Nancy. She was a pilot in Desert Storm and her plane got hit. She had to bail out over enemy territory and all she had was a flask of whiskey, a pistol and a survival knife.
She drank the whiskey on the way down so it wouldn't break and then her parachute landed right in the middle of twenty enemy troops. She shot fifteen of them with the gun until she ran out of bullets, killed four more with the knife, till the blade broke, and then she killed the last Iraqi with her bare hands.'
'Good Heavens' said the horrified teacher. 'What kind of moral did your daddy tell you from this horrible story ?'
'Stay the Fuck Away from Aunt Nancy when she's drinking.'
117![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:35:21pm |
re: #111 3 wood
It keeps telling me that your name cannot be matched with a name on the address list.
Then you blue your name and I'll contact you. I've only been here under this name for about 5 years.
118![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:36:26pm |
re: #115 Harry Tuttle
Did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?
I'm going for a beer. Anyone?
119![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:36:43pm |
3 Wood
See if this helps. (It always worked before.)
121![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:37:40pm |
122![]() |
kcladderman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:09pm |
re: #116 karmic_inquisitor
That one made me laugh out loud.
123![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:12pm |
re: #107 turn
I was reading some stuff about Lincoln earlier today, I'm no historian believe me. I read he struggled with the separation of the constitution and religion, with Calvinism. I'm not so sure the first GOP president believed it was, or should be, founded on both.
In your post you didn't say "religion", you said "the Bible".
124![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:30pm |
re: #121 Harry Tuttle
3 OF THEM AND I AM PICKLED STILL GOT ONE TO GO
125![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:34pm |
re: #109 saberry0530
Be on the lookout for the restaurant scene.
Chez Paul's? Ordered. #36 on my queue. It's worth waiting for.
126![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:41pm |
re: #84 Outrider
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds. I've seen the gun controlers described as "Goldilocks" before because no gun is ever just right. They're too big or too small or too cheap or too expensive and on and on.
They will never be satisfied because they don't want to be satisfied. It's not about controlling crime, it is just about control.
We need to learn that compromise will never work with them. They've told us plain enough, but there's always someone that thinks a compromise is a good idea.
It isn't.
128![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:39:10pm |
re: #83 yochanan
HOW MANY RUSPUTINS DO I HAVE TO HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE IRON FIST RULE?
HELP ME BROTHER
Two drinks ago.
Go to bed.
129![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:39:10pm |
DAMN stuff is great ranks up there with chimay ale
130![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:40:19pm |
re: #127 Iron Fist
I kinda doubt it, myself :-)
she might be happy i will be out of her hair for some time hehe
131![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:41:06pm |
re: #128 3 wood
hehe i am in a good mood haven't been since the election
132![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:41:18pm |
I'm anti-gun control for the US but pro for Canada. Reason is I live in Canada and have a hot temper.
134![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:42:10pm |
re: #126 Iron Fist
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds. I've seen the gun controlers described as "Goldilocks" before because no gun is ever just right. They're too big or too small or too cheap or too expensive and on and on.
They will never be satisfied because they don't want to be satisfied. It's not about controlling crime, it is just about control.
We need to learn that compromise will never work with them. They've told us plain enough, but there's always someone that thinks a compromise is a good idea.
It isn't.
Much like many of the comments I'm seeing on this thread about the direction the GOP should go. (By the way, a RINO is a RINO is a RINO, ect.)
135![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:42:19pm |
136![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:42:31pm |
will do iron fist on my last one will save the chimay ale for later
137![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:43:18pm |
re: #36 turn
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
This sounds a lot like the "become your enemy to defeat him" argument. You don't get more people in your organization by lowering your standards. You get more by raising them. McCain certainly didn't get nominated by the socons in the party......just the opposite, and he was a miserable failure. Mediocrity and lack of conservative values in a candidate are why conservatives stay home. And contrary to popular belief, it's not socons who run the Republican party. That's just the party with values closest to their own.
138![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:43:42pm |
was fun chatting with my son as he was cleaning his m-16
139![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:43:57pm |
re: #97 funky chicken
Perhaps stressing federalism is a way to keep everybody in the big tent. The evangelicals really just became a dominant force in the GOP in the eighties/early nineties. They did it right, meaning they showed up in force at local offices and took over things from the grass roots level. They are extremely passionate about abortion and homosexuality, and are resistant to discussing that perhaps those issues should be dealt with at the local and/or state level...but perhaps many of them would be willing to consider the federalist argument. Fred Thompson would perhaps be a good choice to help convince them....I like Michael Steele very much, but in his interview on Hannity's radio show yesterday, he stressed abortion as on of the key pillars that the GOP should use to win back the majority.
Sorry, but he's wrong about that.....especially at the federal level. Even at the state level abortion bans seem to fail when put to the vote.
I agree and I really believe people can be civilized and decent and still be atheist, gay and/or pro-choice. I don't think government has a role in encouraging or enforcing traditional values or behaviors, at least at the federal level. The constitution will keep us decent and civilized.
140![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:44:18pm |
re: #97 funky chicken
The "social" issues should be decided on the state level by legislatures or referenda. They should not be decided by deconstructionist judges imposing their own celestial visions of enlightened morality.
That is where most of the party can come together, IMO.
141![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:44:34pm |
142![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:44:36pm |
re: #61 Wyatt Earp
Kanye West doesn't care about white people.
This White person isn't too fond of him, either.
145![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:40pm |
Went to the grocery store today. I used the restroom & there was a sign on the door that said, "Please be sure that the door is unlocked before exiting."
Can't argue with that, but I would have added, "Please be sure that the door is open before you walk out."
146![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:48pm |
re: #137 eschew_obfuscation
Mediocrity and lack of conservative values in a candidate are why conservatives stay home.
I've heard that over and over in the last few months. But what kind of spoiled brats are the social conservatives if they won't put a little water in their wine and vote for candidates that come closest to their views? Will they be happy with a left-liberal administration? Is cutting off your nose to spite your face part of the conservative value system?
147![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:52pm |
re: #119 jemima
3 Wood
See if this helps. (It always worked before.)
It still does not work for me, but it could be the computer I'm using.
I'll try it later from home.
148![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:53pm |
149![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:46:38pm |
got a bore snake waiting to send to him
you would think a military would provide that sort of thing wondering if they will charge him duty on the import.
150![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:46:51pm |
re: #147 3 wood
It still does not work for me, but it could be the computer I'm using.
I'll try it later from home.
Okey dokey. Thanks for trying.
151![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:46:59pm |
Heads up to you fellows having 'wife problems'
Don't give up. Keep listening. That goes for the song and for the women in your lucky lives.
152![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:47:32pm |
re: #148 Ben Hur
no problem he seems to be very happy about it.
153![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:47:39pm |
re: #146 Moe Katz
I've heard that over and over in the last few months. But what kind of spoiled brats are the social conservatives if they won't put a little water in their wine and vote for candidates that come closest to their views? Will they be happy with a left-liberal administration? Is cutting off your nose to spite your face part of the conservative value system?
I don't agree with those choosing to stay home at all! I even like your "spoiled brats" term. In general, you're right....cutting off their noses to spite their faces.
It was stupid in 2006 and it's just as stupid today.
155![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:48:56pm |
"Nothing reveals Mr. Obama's visceral hostility to business more than the constant urging of our best and brightest to desert the productive private sector ('greed') and go in to public service like politics or community organizing (i.e., organizing people to press government for more handouts). Who in his ideal world would bake our bread, make our shoes and computers, and pilot our airplanes is not clear."
-- George Newman, an economist and retired business executive
156![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:49:16pm |
re: #143 taxfreekiller
I think voting should be your personal responsibility.
You need to care enough to learn the issues and choices and then to get off your but and make your voice heard.
You shouldn't vote to get a boon.
Likewise proactive voter registration should be banned. This can only encourage fraud, these organizations will never be non partisan.
You have the right to vote, either exercise it yourself or lose it.
157![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:49:19pm |
Howdy.
Well, to me, in spite of the down market and various hassles at work, it's been a Kimberful day.
(Meaning, I am finally in actual possesion of my M1911)
158![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:49:39pm |
re: #126 Iron Fist
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds. I've seen the gun controlers described as "Goldilocks" before because no gun is ever just right. They're too big or too small or too cheap or too expensive and on and on.
They will never be satisfied because they don't want to be satisfied. It's not about controlling crime, it is just about control.
We need to learn that compromise will never work with them. They've told us plain enough, but there's always someone that thinks a compromise is a good idea.
It isn't.
Sadly there can be no compromise. With the anti-gun freaks, it the stereotypical "give an inch, they want a mile". I remember when the Brady law was enacted, the first response of the coalition was to state it was a start.
159![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:50:26pm |
re: #134 Soona'
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
160![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:06pm |
re: #156 Harry Tuttle
From the survey at took at the poll, my area is thinking of doing away with voting precincts. Anybody can vote anywhere in town.
Can you imagine the fraud?
161![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:08pm |
re: #139 turn
I agree and I really believe people can be civilized and decent and still be atheist, gay and/or pro-choice. I don't think government has a role in encouraging or enforcing traditional values or behaviors, at least at the federal level. The constitution will keep us decent and civilized.
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
162![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:13pm |
re: #157 Occasional Reader
Howdy.
Well, to me, in spite of the down market and various hassles at work, it's been a Kimberful day.
(Meaning, I am finally in actual possesion of my M1911)
Woot! (whatever that means - the kids seem to think it's good)
Congrats.....now, will they let you buy ammunition that goes "BANG" when you pull the trigger?
163![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:43pm |
The media and academic establishment of our society seems to be telling us: "America is becoming a minority white nation. People of color are soon to be the majority. Therefore, Obama's policies will become the mainstream."
I don't know and frankly don't care what the race of the majority of Americans happens to be. All I care is that America becomes, once again, a free country. A free country benefits all people "of color." (And, by the way, isn't white a color, too?)
When I hear that America is becoming less white and therefore more socialist (or “progressive” if you prefer the euphemism), I become angry. Why? Because it's insulting to assume that just because someone isn't white that they must be socialist and statist. Maybe most non-whites are socialist, right now. But that doesn't mean it's in their interest, or that they’re right.
Freedom and capitalism and individual rights are in everyone's interest. They're in your interest if you want to be free, to be productive, to work and to think. And even if you don't care to be free, to be productive, to work and to think -- freedom and capitalism are still in your interest. There's no comfort for either the lazy or the productive -- for the intelligent or for the stupid -- in a society where the best and brightest are not allowed to flourish. Everybody needs excellence: Both those who value it, and those who don’t.
This is the lesson that essentially every nation and culture in human history has learned the hard way. America was supposed to be the exception.
164![]() |
FightingBack Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:07pm |
I just read today that 68% of my town voted for Obama.
Limousine Liberals.
165![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:24pm |
re: #159 Iron Fist
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
I fully concur, Sir!
166![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:46pm |
re: #37 Harry Tuttle
You can get Penguin copies of Atlas Shrugged for about $8. I have given a few out. 'Course I really don't expect them to get read, but who knows.
It's a great mystery story.
167![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:56pm |
the hispanic and black vote was very anti gay 75% of the black and hispanic vote voted against the gay admendemnt. problem is race is complex issue.
168![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:02pm |
re: #159 Iron Fist
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
Not to mention the difficulty of following an 8-year Rep. incumbent when the economy is in catastrophic trouble. Sometimes the pendulum just swings, and it swings blindly.
169![]() |
WrathofG-d Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:36pm |
170![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:38pm |
re: #97 funky chicken
Perhaps stressing federalism is a way to keep everybody in the big tent. The evangelicals really just became a dominant force in the GOP in the eighties/early nineties. They did it right, meaning they showed up in force at local offices and took over things from the grass roots level. They are extremely passionate about abortion and homosexuality, and are resistant to discussing that perhaps those issues should be dealt with at the local and/or state level...but perhaps many of them would be willing to consider the federalist argument. Fred Thompson would perhaps be a good choice to help convince them....I like Michael Steele very much, but in his interview on Hannity's radio show yesterday, he stressed abortion as on of the key pillars that the GOP should use to win back the majority.
Sorry, but he's wrong about that.....especially at the federal level. Even at the state level abortion bans seem to fail when put to the vote.
I think the issue of abortion should be argued from a federalist perspective.
Before Roe (where rights were created out of thin air) the states regulated abortion. Roe took it away. What is wrong with letting the states decide - especially when the states are the ones on the hook for the consequences.
Roe short circuited democracy, just as the fabrication of a same sex marriage right was fabricated by the courts here. Many who voted for 8 did it because the courts had pissed them off.
The theme for 2010 should be "let us decide". The Democrats are trying to institute "Soft Paternalism" but paternalism is paternalism. Let states make more decisions. Let individuals make more decisions. Get the social engineers in congress and the courts out of the way.
What is the point of fighting for a free country when the federal government appoints itself to make decisions for you?
171![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:40pm |
re: #123 Soona'
In your post you didn't say "religion", you said "the Bible".
Yes, and the bible is a collection of religious writings. I guess I using them synonymously. Do you have a comment about hot button issues?
172![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:47pm |
re: #159 Iron Fist
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
That and the fact that Mac never really took the offensive where Obama did
Mac could have taken the economic and character issues (and others) much farther and who knows if that would have made a difference. It certainly could have. This election was the republicans to lose and they did so splendidly.
173![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:54:23pm |
re: #163 gmsc
Because it's insulting to assume that just because someone isn't white that they must be socialist and statist.
Hear hear.
And assuming that Obama's "policies" are a result of his skin color, as the author indicated is a statement being made lately, and that these are also the "policies" of every one of color is insulting and flat out racism.
174![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:54:35pm |
re: #161 Soona'
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
We already fought a war over that. Remember?
175![]() |
whiterasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:54:36pm |
re: #145 opnion
The health and safety kooks are starting to annoy me.
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
The manager of one place told me it can't be served too hot because of "liability".
Liability, bullshit. I want my damn soup HOT!
176![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:55:04pm |
re: #157 Occasional Reader
Howdy.
Well, to me, in spite of the down market and various hassles at work, it's been a Kimberful day.
(Meaning, I am finally in actual possesion of my M1911)
Congrats!
177![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:55:13pm |
re: #158 Outrider
Yep. There really isn't any compromise with them, because they never give anything back. They take what they can get with the intent of coming for more the moment that they can.
We need to be like them. Heller is just the start. We need to keep going until we have all of our rights protected by the State. To the point that no one brings up the possibility of gun control any more than they'd try and reinstitute slavery.
179![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:55:33pm |
iran fired a test missle just wait for the real thing.
180![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:12pm |
re: #67 joncelli
Current conditions in Anchorage, AK. (Be careful what you wish for.)
It that Celsius?
Concerned in California.
181![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:22pm |
re: #175 whiterasta
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
I take it you ordered beef and barely soup.
182![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:28pm |
re: #129 yochanan
DAMN stuff is great ranks up there with chimay ale
What the heck are you drinking, Belgian beer? I want some of that. Ha
183![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:50pm |
re: #167 yochanan
the hispanic and black vote was very anti gay 75% of the black and hispanic vote voted against the gay admendemnt. problem is race is complex issue.
I agree with your percentages but I don't agree that voting against gay marriage is anti-gay by definition. One can fully agree with the right to be gay, or even be gay onself, and still not believe that marriage laws should apply.
184![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:58pm |
re: #8 Salem
I seem to recall a lot of people on this forum refused to support Rudy in part because they suspected him of wanting to magically confiscate our guns. Now we have a Dem monopoly with a gun owner's worst nightmare in the White House.
Yep, we're all really gonna want to put our support behind the socons now, huh? Who knows what we can achieve in 2010 with that kind of brain-power?
Realistically, Giuliani wouldn't have wasted any political capital on another national gun ban, regardless of how he conducted himself as Mayor of NYC.
Ultimately, the only one responsible for Giuliani's loss in the primary is Giuliani. His "put all the chips on Florida" was (retrospectively) a flawed strategy.
Had he received the nomination, I suspect that most of the SOCONs would have ultimately rallied around him, the way they did around McCain. You may recall that eight years ago McCain said something bashing the religious right. That (arguably) ended up costing him the State of SC, and the Republican nomination for POTUS. The point is, if the religious right could go back back McCain, why wouldn't they have ultimately backed Giuliani?
But really, who is to say Giuliani would have beaten Obama? He may have. . .he may not have. (Though he certainly WOULD have trashed Obama during the debates. . .all of them).
185![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:21pm |
re: #112 Kenneth
Stupid fat-assed snaggle-toothed loser mouthing off again
Until I clicked, I was sure you meant Huckabee.
187![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:39pm |
re: #182 turn
today i am doint old reasputin russian impearl stout... ( damn spelling)
almost as good as chimay ale....
188![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:41pm |
re: #175 whiterasta
The health and safety kooks are starting to annoy me.
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
The manager of one place told me it can't be served too hot because of "liability".Liability, bullshit. I want my damn soup HOT!
Dang, I'll sign a waiver. Just heat it up.
189![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:49pm |
re: #177 Iron Fist
Yep. There really isn't any compromise with them, because they never give anything back. They take what they can get with the intent of coming for more the moment that they can.
We need to be like them. Heller is just the start. We need to keep going until we have all of our rights protected by the State. To the point that no one brings up the possibility of gun control any more than they'd try and reinstitute slavery.
Yup. What he said.
190![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:59pm |
re: #179 yochanan
iran fired a test missle just wait for the real thing.
My best uneducated guess is that Pooty Poot will start/resume gobbling up countries and Obama will convene NATO or the UN security council and have them issue a harshly worded letter in response.
191![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:58:18pm |
re: #176 Soona'
Congrats!
Thank you.
Gotta take it to the range this weekend and start breaking it in... the thing is tight as a tick.
192![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:59:15pm |
personally i doubt the mayor would have won and i liked john mccain too
hard to say who would have been better.
193![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:00:27pm |
Some of you will appreciate this:
194![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:00:33pm |
chit is going to hit the fan as joe biden said i will support the military who ever is POTUS.
195![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:00:39pm |
re: #157 Occasional Reader
Congrats :-)
I had a pic of a cute little Bennelli with a 14" barrel that I was going to put up, but I can't find it. If you 've got to be registered, get something with authority :-)
196![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:03pm |
Saw DEVO at the Del Mar Racetrack two months ago...
They were AWESOME!
Mark Mothersbaugh said something like,
"Here we are surrounded by synthetic turf and horse turds...and you think de-evolution isn't real?
I laughed my ass off.
197![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:05pm |
re: #170 karmic_inquisitor
I think the issue of abortion should be argued from a federalist perspective.
Before Roe (where rights were created out of thin air) the states regulated abortion. Roe took it away. What is wrong with letting the states decide - especially when the states are the ones on the hook for the consequences.
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
198![]() |
unclassifiable Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:27pm |
re: #161 Soona'
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
At what point do we say let the individual decide vs. the state vs. federal government? It's a tricky thing but when we advocate local control the question always is how local do you want.
199![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:57pm |
re: #175 whiterasta
The health and safety kooks are starting to annoy me.
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
The manager of one place told me it can't be served too hot because of "liability".Liability, bullshit. I want my damn soup HOT!
I does get silly. I was looking at end of season gas grills on sale.
More than a few had lablels warning, "Do not use indoors"
200![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:02:38pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
Isn't that kind of the point of states rights? Don't tread on me.
201![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:03:26pm |
re: #126 Iron Fist
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds.
A "sniper" rifle is any centerfire rifle with a telescopic sight. In other words pretty much EVERY hunting rifle would classify as a "sniper" rifle under any legitimate classification of such. (And in fact, many military sniper rifles essentially are specialized hunting rifles).
As to the horrible .50 caliber guns, those also cost nearly $2000, with rounds at $3 EACH, and so far as I know, there has never been ANY violent crime committed with one in the history of the USA, EVER.
Its literally physically impossible to mug someone with one, and next to impossible to actually rob a bank with one.
The pols are afraid of them for a very simple reason. . ..50 cal rifles in the hands of civilians endanger the gov't monopoly on violence. More to the point, politicans are scared of them, because its far harder to quell civilian resistance if scattered civilians have these weapons.
202![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:03:52pm |
NO MORE POSTS THANKS TO THE IRON FIST RULE AS WELL AS THE CLOCK
203![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:03pm |
I'm a socon and I'm for letting the states decide on abortion.
204![]() |
whiterasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:10pm |
re: #199 opnion
I think there is a website out there that features stupid warnings on products.
205![]() |
wright1 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:29pm |
re: #183 Silhouette
I agree with your percentages but I don't agree that voting against gay marriage is anti-gay by definition. One can fully agree with the right to be gay, or even be gay oneself, and still not believe that marriage laws should apply.
Agreed. The notion that because you endorse traditional values and in this case, marriage, as a concept defined between a man and a woman, does not make "anti-gay." For some like myself, I don't agree with the lifestyle but, I can love the sinner and hate the sin. On a personal note, my brother is gay so I am not unfamiliar to this issue. But my love for him does not ameliorate my own core principles. The notion of "gay marriage is an anathema to me. On many levels, I do not support it. That is a far cry from asking the State to ban their lifestyle - on the contrary, I just don't wan it sanctioned by the State. And I suspect many more agree with this but due to P.C. they have lost their ability to object.
206![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:37pm |
Well, at any rate, it's Obama now. I don't honestly think Jindal will be the next nominee, anyway. It may be Palin, though I'm not certain that would be a good thing. There will be a lot of factors, some of which no doubt are no doubt beyond our knowing at the present.
208![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:05:05pm |
re: #137 eschew_obfuscation
This sounds a lot like the "become your enemy to defeat him" argument. You don't get more people in your organization by lowering your standards. You get more by raising them. McCain certainly didn't get nominated by the socons in the party......just the opposite, and he was a miserable failure. Mediocrity and lack of conservative values in a candidate are why conservatives stay home. And contrary to popular belief, it's not socons who run the Republican party. That's just the party with values closest to their own.
Thank you for providing another perspective eschew. How would you characterize "by raising them (standards)". Does this mean we build the base by insisting every conservative be pro-life, anti gay marriage, and a creationist with the notion that only liberals hold opposing viewpoints or beliefs?
209![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:05:59pm |
re: #204 whiterasta
I think there is a website out there that features stupid warnings on products.
I'm going to look for it. I am at once amused & bemused by some of them.
210![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:08pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Some of you will appreciate this:
Why are people so hung up on embryonic stem cell research? At this point, any benefit from it is just speculation, while adult stem cell research has provided real medical benefits and new discoveries have basically obviated the need for embryonic cells.
Perhaps this is why all of the arguments appear to be couched in terms of "stem cell research", leaving off the "embryonic" and ignoring the fact that adult stem cell research is legal and federally funded almost everywhere.
This is just like the "illegal immigration" issue. "illegal" is always left out of the discussion and it becomes all about "immigration".
All attempts to move the goal posts when an argument is losing.
211![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:30pm |
re: #206 Salem
Well, at any rate, it's Obama now. I don't honestly think Jindal will be the next nominee, anyway. It may be Palin, though I'm not certain that would be a good thing. There will be a lot of factors, some of which no doubt are no doubt beyond our knowing at the present.
I like Palin but man there are a lot of battles between here and there at this point.
It's a big shit sandwich and we all gotta take a big bite.
212![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:35pm |
re: #171 turn
Yes, and the bible is a collection of religious writings. I guess I using them synonymously. Do you have a comment about hot button issues?
I can read the Bible and be inspired without being associated with any religion. And as far as "hot buttons" are concerned, if it's not abortion or religion then it will be something else. There have always been items of hot debate in every election. There were hot buttons when Reagen won his landslide victory. Why? Because his conservative message was strong and sure, made with confidence, with no back-tracking or wimping out because some poll showed some focus group of people didn't like what he was saying.
213![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:50pm |
re: #205 wright1
One of the best concise yet comprehensive posts on opposition to gay marriage was posted here by a man who happens to be gay.
214![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:07:27pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
i think it's mark steyn who talks abt this in his book "america alone".
at some point museums and galleries in europe will be pressured to remove or cover paintings and sculpture that are deemed offensive to moslem sensibilities.
this will include masterpieces that have been loved and admired for centuries.
stealth jihad on art is a way to rob people of pride in their culture and diminish the value of their accomplishments.
there will be a lot of calligraphy and tile work to look at if these barbarians get their way.
215![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:07:39pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
Which makes them the RINOs in my opinion - who are they to impose a religious precept on everyone else? There are many religions where abortion is allowed, Judaism being one. My religion doesn't allow it, but there are many things my religion bans that are legal - like adultery and contraception.
I don't understand how, given all of human history, we still have people thinking that we can use the laws of the state to create a moral population. It doesn't even work in Saudi Arabia or Iran.
216![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:07:51pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Interesting article. Writer could not bring himself to vote Republican...I hope he read this guy's comment:
I can understand some people's disgust with the Republican party. However, both major parties are coalitions of groups with both similar and differing views. The Republican party is a coalition of business people, supporters of free markets, libertarians, 2nd Amendment gun owners, the religious right and other conservatives. The Democratic party is a coalition of liberals, socialists, communists, labor unions, America haters, multiculturalists and minorities that want government handouts.
WELL SAID...
217![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:14pm |
re: #146 Moe Katz
I've heard that over and over in the last few months. But what kind of spoiled brats are the social conservatives if they won't put a little water in their wine and vote for candidates that come closest to their views? Will they be happy with a left-liberal administration? Is cutting off your nose to spite your face part of the conservative value system?
Exactly. I don't really buy into the notion that conservatives are staying home because of these issues, maybe just the socons.
218![]() |
GeeWiz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:24pm |
After reading thru the previous thread and watching this video, I think GWB should hold an evening televised speech and announce that his military advisers have informed him of a Iraq victory and he is awaiting their advice on troop withdrawal. Not to be done right away, but sometime before Jan. 15.
219![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:24pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
And if women in such a desperate situation are forced to do that, the socons still come out looking like a bunch of throwbacks.
220![]() |
whiterasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:30pm |
221![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:09:28pm |
re: #195 Iron Fist
Congrats :-)
I had a pic of a cute little Bennelli with a 14" barrel that I was going to put up, but I can't find it. If you 've got to be registered, get something with authority :-)
Yep, unforunately the Black Helicopters know where to find me...
(kidding... I think)
The good news is, while the last time I registered a firearm in DC it took almost 3 months, this time it took, in total, about 2 hours. Much improved.
222![]() |
FightingBack Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:09:40pm |
re: #188 Silhouette
Waiver, Shmaiver.
You can still sue.
223![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:10:11pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
This may be true, but in converse, the reason why the liberals are against State control there is for the exact opposite reason. Namely, because there would be States that would likely further restrict abortion, or possibly ban it altogether. (Though in practice, abortion isn't readily available in lots of the places that would ban it anyway).
Personally, from my perspective as a voter, this is a non-issue. Support or opposition to abortion isn't by itself a criteria by which I decide whom to vote for.
224![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:10:18pm |
re: #210 eschew_obfuscation
Why are people so hung up on embryonic stem cell research? At this point, any benefit from it is just speculation, while adult stem cell research has provided real medical benefits and new discoveries have basically obviated the need for embryonic cells.
Perhaps this is why all of the arguments appear to be couched in terms of "stem cell research", leaving off the "embryonic" and ignoring the fact that adult stem cell research is legal and federally funded almost everywhere.
This is just like the "illegal immigration" issue. "illegal" is always left out of the discussion and it becomes all about "immigration".
All attempts to move the goal posts when an argument is losing.
IIRC, embryonic stem cell research is legal, but the federal funding of it is not. If there were any real promise in embryonic stem cells, you'd think some bright young researcher would get private funding and go on to make a mint. In reality, adult stem cells are where they're seeing results.
225![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:08pm |
BTW - banning abortions does not stop abortions.
Here is info on a study which found abortion rates in countries where it is banned to be the same as those where it is legal.
Morality is a matter of the choices we make not the laws we live under.
226![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:09pm |
re: #198 unclassifiable
At what point do we say let the individual decide vs. the state vs. federal government? It's a tricky thing but when we advocate local control the question always is how local do you want.
The Constitution just mentions states. So if the state legislatures want to give control of such things to communities, then it's their business.
227![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:19pm |
re: #161 Soona'
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
I agree 100%. In fact I was going to say that in my original post but thought I would be biting off more than I could chew.
228![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:22pm |
re: #201 looking closely
The pols are afraid of them for a very simple reason. . ..50 cal rifles in the hands of civilians endanger the gov't monopoly on violence.
That line of reasoning has always struck me as a little problematic.
Would we really want, say, Stinger missiles to be freely, legally available to anyone with ready cash? How about nukes? Etc. There is some "line drawing" that comes into play, at some point.
229![]() |
akak Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:51pm |
Looks like Gaby Ashkenazi got to much credit, he's heading into Halutz territory! Does he just want to keep his job or what?
230![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:13:39pm |
re: #208 turn
Thank you for providing another perspective eschew. How would you characterize "by raising them (standards)". Does this mean we build the base by insisting every conservative be pro-life, anti gay marriage, and a creationist with the notion that only liberals hold opposing viewpoints or beliefs?
No. I believe we raise the standards by nominating people who are, at least, fiscal conservatives and, additionally for things like fair immigration policy, and standing up for true diversity of thought and speech, robust support of capitalism, small government, low taxes.
As an aside, I'd mention that I don't think we have, in the last 100 years, found the peak of the Laffer curve, where income tax rates produce the maximum revenue to the government. We've always been on the high (right) side of the curve.
231![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:14:37pm |
re: #174 victor_yugo
We already fought a war over that. Remember?
Slavery was abolished by a constitutional amendment.
232![]() |
caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:14:51pm |
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
233![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:06pm |
re: #214 nyc redneck
i think it's mark steyn who talks abt this in his book "america alone".
at some point museums and galleries in europe will be pressured to remove or cover paintings and sculpture that are deemed offensive to moslem sensibilities.
this will include masterpieces that have been loved and admired for centuries.
stealth jihad on art is a way to rob people of pride in their culture and diminish the value of their accomplishments.
there will be a lot of calligraphy and tile work to look at if these barbarians get their way.
As an art lover, I worry about that a lot. If you removed every work with nudity or religious content from the Louvre, for example, all you'd have left are some butt-ugly modern works that look more like vandalism than art, and maybe a couple of still lifes. I am hoping to spend part of my retirement visiting the great cathedrals, palaces and museums of Europe, but I worry they may not be there in 20 or 30 years.
234![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:07pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
Because of my personal convictions, I would like to see abortion banned.
But the hard and real fact of the matter is that the law is what it is, and it will remain. Abortion will not be banned.
Rather than harping on the fact that abortion is legal, it is much better at this point, and more effective, for individual people to live their lives based on their own personal convictions, and this includes doing what they can to promote a "choice of life", if that is what your convictions tell you is correct.
Gay marriage is an issue that, it seems to me, most people do not want to become a fact. It is not a "conservative" issue.
Evolution vs. creationism - those of us who can should ensure that the candidates that are chosen and promoted for election at the local level are people who can think critically about this issue, and come to the right conclusion, that is, science education should be science, and faith issues should remain in the hands of parents, not the schools. Those elected to national office usually have some sort of local experience to begin with - if we ensure those local officials are thinking straight on this, they will filter upward in the party.
235![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:23pm |
re: #197 Charles
Speaking as a staunch pro-lifer who has worked in the pro-life movement with both Catholics and Evangelicals for over fifteen years, I would say that you are making an unijustified sweeping statement about "social conservatives," whoever they are. A solid majority of the people I've worked with on pro-life issue believe the issue should be decided by legislatures on a state level.
I certainly do.
236![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:32pm |
William Ayers on GMA today said that his bombings were not terrorism because he targeted property not people. Interesting though that his bombs were made with dynamite & nails etc. Those are anti personal bombs according to a former FBI agent on FNC.
He also claimed that he only knew Obama like thousands of others in the neighborhood.
In a new afterward on the reissue of his book he describes Obama as "A neighbor & family friend." Which is it?
237![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:55pm |
re: #231 turn
Slavery was abolished by a constitutional amendment.
Well... the amendment was made possible by the war, ya see.
238![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:16:11pm |
re: #225 karmic_inquisitor
BTW - banning abortions does not stop abortions.
Here is info on a study which found abortion rates in countries where it is banned to be the same as those where it is legal.
Morality is a matter of the choices we make not the laws we live under.
Good point.
239![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:16:40pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
...and then we have the far left (Obama) who have no problem with
partial birth abortion & an end to parental consent for minors.
I agree with PJ O Rourke on this one.
240![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:16:43pm |
re: #224 doppelganglander
Yes, and Big Pharma would be absolutely THROWING money at it, and they're not.
241![]() |
boogberg Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:17:33pm |
Any penny-ante investors here? I just opened my first account and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth. :D
242![]() |
vxbush Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:17:44pm |
re: #240 eschew_obfuscation
Yes, and Big Pharma would be absolutely THROWING money at it, and they're not.
DING DING DING! If there were a chance to make money at it, Big pharma and lots of other venture capital folks would be pouring money in. They aren't.
/back to lurking
243![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:18:20pm |
re: #205 wright1
Not all gays, BTW, are in favor of redefining marriage.
But if you think black conservatives are mistreated,........
Well, let's just say that for some people, in this tolerant moonbat world, expressing an un-PC opinion would be physically dangerous.
244![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:18:27pm |
re: #234 reine.de.tout
Because of my personal convictions, I would like to see abortion banned.
But the hard and real fact of the matter is that the law is what it is, and it will remain. Abortion will not be banned.
Rather than harping on the fact that abortion is legal, it is much better at this point, and more effective, for individual people to live their lives based on their own personal convictions, and this includes doing what they can to promote a "choice of life", if that is what your convictions tell you is correct.
Gay marriage is an issue that, it seems to me, most people do not want to become a fact. It is not a "conservative" issue.
Evolution vs. creationism - those of us who can should ensure that the candidates that are chosen and promoted for election at the local level are people who can think critically about this issue, and come to the right conclusion, that is, science education should be science, and faith issues should remain in the hands of parents, not the schools. Those elected to national office usually have some sort of local experience to begin with - if we ensure those local officials are thinking straight on this, they will filter upward in the party.
That says it pretty well.
Here's what I want in order;
limited government
strong national defense
Anything beyond that you need to convince me it's worth our money. Some things will be but the less the better.
245![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:18:44pm |
re: #224 doppelganglander
IIRC, embryonic stem cell research is legal, but the federal funding of it is not.
It's even more qualified than that; federal funding of it is legal, but only with embryonic stem cell lines already in existence at the date Bush signed the relevant Executive Order.
Of course, most lefties are firmly convinced that "Bush banned stem cell research!", and they don't let facts get in their way.
246![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:19:28pm |
re: #216 CalBear84
Interesting article. Writer could not bring himself to vote Republican...I hope he read this guy's comment:
I can understand some people's disgust with the Republican party. However, both major parties are coalitions of groups with both similar and differing views. The Republican party is a coalition of business people, supporters of free markets, libertarians, 2nd Amendment gun owners, the religious right and other conservatives. The Democratic party is a coalition of liberals, socialists, communists, labor unions, America haters, multiculturalists and minorities that want government handouts.WELL SAID...
Indeed. and that is the struggle.
247![]() |
wii42 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:19:28pm |
totally OT:
For musically-inclined lizards who've ever wanted a portable synth/sequencer for $40 (assuming you've got a DS):
248![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:05pm |
re: #228 Occasional Reader
That line of reasoning has always struck me as a little problematic.
Would we really want, say, Stinger missiles to be freely, legally available to anyone with ready cash? How about nukes? Etc. There is some "line drawing" that comes into play, at some point.
Wow! Stinger missiles. Cool!
249![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:09pm |
re: #230 eschew_obfuscation
No. I believe we raise the standards by nominating people who are, at least, fiscal conservatives and, additionally for things like fair immigration policy, and standing up for true diversity of thought and speech, robust support of capitalism, small government, low taxes.
As an aside, I'd mention that I don't think we have, in the last 100 years, found the peak of the Laffer curve, where income tax rates produce the maximum revenue to the government. We've always been on the high (right) side of the curve.
FWIW, it has been my experience in California where the "litmus test" was put in place in 1994 that the litmus test gave us candidates that placed the social agenda well ahead of the fiscal agenda. And it shouldn't surprise anyone - at its core in a person who wants to regulate your morality is someone willing to go along with regulating everything else.
Part of having faith in a democracy is letting people make choices for themselves, even if those choices would damn them to hell.
250![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:10pm |
re: #241 boogberg
Any penny-ante investors here? I just opened my first account and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth. :D
Go for it. You could be in line for a government bailout. :)
251![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:12pm |
re: #232 caliredst8r
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
Because doctors are experts on gun safety.
Just like the NRA are experts on colonoscopies.
252![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:28pm |
re: #241 boogberg
Any penny-ante investors here? I just opened my first account and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth. :D
Just mail me a check for $100 to spread the wealth around.
Not to discourage risk taking, but GM is a black hole. There are other beaten down stocks that will eventually recover and pay you a nice dividend in the meantime.
253![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:59pm |
re: #241 boogberg
and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth
I'd do it, if I could get a paper certificate. If nothing else, in 30 years it'll have souvenir value. Or, just maybe, it'll be worth millions! (Once the future, revitalized GM comes out with the Jetsons flying car that runs on "Mr. Fusion")
254![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:21:05pm |
re: #237 Occasional Reader
Well... the amendment was made possible by the war, ya see.
And a grant from Kelloggs.
/PBS humor
255![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:21:36pm |
re: #216 CalBear84
Interesting article. Writer could not bring himself to vote Republican...I hope he read this guy's comment:
I can understand some people's disgust with the Republican party. However, both major parties are coalitions of groups with both similar and differing views. The Republican party is a coalition of business people, supporters of free markets, libertarians, 2nd Amendment gun owners, the religious right and other conservatives. The Democratic party is a coalition of liberals, socialists, communists, labor unions, America haters, multiculturalists and minorities that want government handouts.WELL SAID...
It seems that the religious right scared some folks into running into the arms of the Marxists. Of course the Marxist who won this year had to campaign falsely as a conservative.
256![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:21:58pm |
re: #248 Soona'
Wow! Stinger missiles. Cool!
Sure, until you see local students from the nearest King Fahd Academy stocking up on them. Not so cool.
257![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:08pm |
re: #242 vxbush
DING DING DING! If there were a chance to make money at it, Big pharma and lots of other venture capital folks would be pouring money in. They aren't.
/back to lurking
Of course, a big part of BHO's health plan is to penalize big pharma. The fact that this will drain funds for R&D is forgotten.
258![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:14pm |
re: #245 Occasional Reader
Of course, most lefties are firmly convinced that "Bush banned stem cell research!", and they don't let facts get in their way.
Just like they are sure Bush raised the level of arsenic allowable in drinking water.
259![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:15pm |
re: #235 wolfie
Speaking as a staunch pro-lifer who has worked in the pro-life movement with both Catholics and Evangelicals for over fifteen years, I would say that you are making an unijustified sweeping statement about "social conservatives," whoever they are. A solid majority of the people I've worked with on pro-life issue believe the issue should be decided by legislatures on a state level.
I certainly do.
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christian groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
260![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:18pm |
re: #216 CalBear84
Yes, I saw that comment too and thought it was spot on.
With 300+ million people in this country and only 2 political parties, the parties are bound to be coalition based.
This business of "socons" and "RINOs" is obnoxious. Why are people so anxious to slap labels on (usually poorly defined) groups?
261![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:47pm |
re: #254 Silhouette
And a grant from Kelloggs.
/PBS humor
Archer Daniel Midlands!
Big Bird is Big Agro's bitch.
262![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:58pm |
re: #249 karmic_inquisitor
FWIW, it has been my experience in California where the "litmus test" was put in place in 1994 that the litmus test gave us candidates that placed the social agenda well ahead of the fiscal agenda. And it shouldn't surprise anyone - at its core in a person who wants to regulate your morality is someone willing to go along with regulating everything else.
Part of having faith in a democracy is letting people make choices for themselves, even if those choices would damn them to hell.
Definitely.....on that we're in total agreement ;-)
263![]() |
Caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:20pm |
re: #251 Silhouette
Maybe they're just worried about the effects of second hand smoke if I happen to shoot the TV again.
264![]() |
Who Watches the Watchmen? Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:30pm |
Prop 8 protests nationwide tomorrow
I thought the election was over. Get it on the ballot again, folks.
265![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:37pm |
re: #244 Harry Tuttle
That says it pretty well.
Here's what I want in order;
limited government
strong national defenseAnything beyond that you need to convince me it's worth our money. Some things will be but the less the better.
Lower, simpler taxes
266![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:43pm |
re: #260 wolfie
This business of "socons" and "RINOs" is obnoxious. Why are people so anxious to slap labels on (usually poorly defined) groups?
We should call such people "LabelCons"!
/
267![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:24:22pm |
re: #210 eschew_obfuscation
Why are people so hung up on embryonic stem cell research?
Hope. or false hope. I'm not sure.
268![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:24:51pm |
re: #232 caliredst8r
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
I believe it's a recommendation of the American Academy of ( ed--left wing) Pediatrics to ask this.
PS: was there a question asking if there was a swimming pool in the home?
The reason I am asking is that a child is something like 30 times more likely to die in a backyard pool than he is to shoot himself with the family gun.
Very few children accidentally shoot themselves or others. In fact, most childhood gun deaths are gang violence related.
but don't let that little fact interfere with the anti-gun message of the million mom march and the AAP
269![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:25:25pm |
re: #251 Silhouette
Because doctors are experts on gun safety.
Just like the NRA are experts on colonoscopies.
LOL! (I thought it sounded strange that the NRA would have proctologists, but the guy seemed nice)
270![]() |
DaddyG Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:25:30pm |
I have a unique take on the Gay Marriage issue...
We started down that slippery slope when we started to treat marital status as a category of tax exemption. Take the monetary benefit out of it and leave marriage to the Church where it belongs.
That being said I'd rather see partner benefits and civil unions vs. expanding the definition of marriage to cover whatever the morality de jour decides is kosher.
271![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:16pm |
re: #263 Caliredst8r
Maybe they're just worried about the effects of second hand smoke if I happen to shoot the TV again.
Heh..... If second had smoke were as big a health problem as it's made out to be, all the baby boomers would be dead.
272![]() |
joan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:37pm |
How can we support Michael Steele? An excellent 21st Century face for the Republican Party; he's a very savvy guy.
MIAMI -- Former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele is running to be the next chairman of the Republican National Committee.
Following the GOP's sweeping losses in last week's elections, Steele said the party in recent years has failed to live up to its principles.
"The Republican Party must present a vision for the future of America that relies on our conservative values and core principles," he said. "It is wrong to believe the voters have suddenly become liberal. They have just lost any sense of confidence that the Republican Party holds the answers to their problems."
Steele was state chairman of the Maryland Republican Party from 2000 to 2002. He was the state's lieutenant governor from 2003-2007, becoming the first black candidate ever elected to a statewide position there. In November 2006, he lost a bid for the U.S. Senate.
"Most Americans today see a Republican Party that defines itself by what it is against rather than what it is for," Steele said in announcing his candidacy Thursday in Miami, where the Republican Governors Association is meeting. "We can tell you why public schools aren't working but not articulate a compelling vision for how we'll better educate children. We're well equipped to rail against tax increases but can't begin to explain how we'll help the poor."
273![]() |
boogberg Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:50pm |
re: #253 Occasional Reader
I'd do it, if I could get a paper certificate. If nothing else, in 30 years it'll have souvenir value. Or, just maybe, it'll be worth millions! (Once the future, revitalized GM comes out with the Jetsons flying car that runs on "Mr. Fusion")
Lol! Yeah, that's what I was thinking too.
274![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:54pm |
re: #268 Shug
PS: was there a question asking if there was a swimming pool in the home?
Or a set of kitchen knives, or an automobile, or a shower, or a stove, or....
[you get the idea]
A well-meaning lib friend looked at me with something like panic when I mentioned I had bought a pistol. She seems quite concerned that the evil gun will jump up and shoot me of its own accord, any day now.
275![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:27:10pm |
re: #265 Soona'
Lower, simpler taxes
Who said anything about taxes?
But fair enough, it should be specified. Limited government in my mind limits need to tax the society.
276![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:27:19pm |
re: #230 eschew_obfuscation
I'm going to have to research that Laffer curve stuff another day, thanks.
Have a great weekend all, time to go walk the black lab along the American.
277![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:28:03pm |
re: #259 Charles
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christians groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
Another thing that turning the decision over to the states would do - It would deprive the left of a major fund raising issue for federal elections. NARAL rakes in big bucks sending out "action letters" to women in states that would never see an abortion ban. These letters raise big $ for Democrats.
And another thing - a constitutional amendment on abortion will never happen because the requisite number of states would not ratify it. But the socons don't think about that - it is all about moral victories rather than actual ones.
278![]() |
Caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:28:28pm |
re: #268 Shug
No question about a swimming pool, but there was one asking if the child knew how to swim.
279![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:30:53pm |
re: #264 Who Watches the Watchmen?
Prop 8 protests nationwide tomorrow
I thought the election was over. Get it on the ballot again, folks.
Nationwide protests over a California ballot initiative? I'm in Nevada, driving distance from the Calfornia border, and I don't see much excitement over it on this side.
280![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:03pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Some of you will appreciate this:
Alternate title: Why I helped Barack 0bama get elected
281![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:04pm |
re: #264 Who Watches the Watchmen?
Prop 8 protests nationwide tomorrow
I thought the election was over. Get it on the ballot again, folks.
But that takes all sorts of boring political work! It's much more fun to make giant papier maché puppets, yell and scream, and maybe break stuff and threaten people.
282![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:22pm |
This debate will go on because I think we can all say, the Republican party is faced with a divide now.
Much like the Democrats in 2004, & 2006, they did their best to drive moderates out of the party, think Joe Lieberman.
Core beliefs are just what they indicate. Core. They transcend politics, elections, and winning. Asking someone to sign on, and disregard what they believe to be self evident truths in their own mind, is not a good solution.
I have made numerous arguments on these "hot button" issues, specifically void of the religious bend because I feel there is no way to divide fiscal socialism with social conservatism. Not a Litmus test.
I can see the logic in the argument of the socially liberal Republican, when certain issues pertaining to abortion should be allowed to suffice for rape, incest, and "life" of the mother. But lets face facts. Abortion in this country, by a vastly large percentage, is used as birth control. Some women have had abortions numbering 6-7-8, and more. As well, we also have some of the most readily available medical technology that can prevent someone from becoming pregnant if they wish not to.
As well, realize, this argument does not stop here. The next argument is federal funding. Whether you believe it or not, just as much as the Dobson's, or any other group who deals in special interest, the other side of that coin exists. They will demand federal funding. They already have, numerous times. The argument will not be satisfied with just letting go of your feelings on abortion.
Now consider, there are many, many people in this country who still think abortion is killing an unborn baby. Consider as well, by asking them to dismiss their core beliefs, a day will dawn on them when they are responsible for not only violating their core belief, but funding what they see as murder as well.
I acknowledge, it is not an easy argument. Where we go from here, I don't have the answer.
283![]() |
CLLRusso Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:36pm |
re: #229 akak
Looks like Gaby Ashkenazi got to much credit, he's heading into Halutz territory! Does he just want to keep his job or what?
At least Ashkenazi had the foresight in the Barak administration to beg him not to withdraw IDF forces from southern Lebanon. Don't know to what you are referring, but he's my hero for that effort.
284![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:44pm |
re: #233 doppelganglander
As an art lover, I worry about that a lot. If you removed every work with nudity or religious content from the Louvre, for example, all you'd have left are some butt-ugly modern works that look more like vandalism than art, and maybe a couple of still lifes. I am hoping to spend part of my retirement visiting the great cathedrals, palaces and museums of Europe, but I worry they may not be there in 20 or 30 years.
this is exactly what i'm talking abt. not only is there a push to censor contemporary art but many masterpieces will be covered or moved to back rooms and locked away. they won't be readily available for leisurely viewing.
what a wonderful retirement plan you have lined up. i'd say go as soon as you can. who knows what europe will be like in 20 or 30 yrs. and i'm not just speaking of art.
285![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:34:19pm |
re: #274 Occasional Reader
Or a set of kitchen knives, or an automobile, or a shower, or a stove, or....
[you get the idea]A well-meaning lib friend looked at me with something like panic when I mentioned I had bought a pistol. She seems quite concerned that the evil gun will jump up and shoot me of its own accord, any day now.
Oh, my goodness! Get rid of all electric outlets! Banish the toasters!
286![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:35:00pm |
re: #284 nyc redneck
this is exactly what i'm talking abt. not only is there a push to censor contemporary art but many masterpieces will be covered or moved to back rooms and locked away. they won't be readily available for leisurely viewing.
what a wonderful retirement plan you have lined up. i'd say go as soon as you can. who knows what europe will be like in 20 or 30 yrs. and i'm not just speaking of art.
That's all well and good but I demand little coverlets for those offensive table legs!
287![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:35:21pm |
re: #259 Charles
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christian groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
I think it's more about frustration over the fact that close to nothing has been done to try to overturn Roe vs. Wade. Liberal SCOTUS or not, there just hasn't been anyone that wants to impose on the court to change that decision. Maybe it's the only route they think they have. I don't agree with it, but I can understand.
288![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:35:27pm |
re: #255 FrogMarch
Faux-Cons!
Obama's gonna give me a tax cut!
289![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:36:13pm |
re: #232 caliredst8r
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
don't reveal that information.
he doesn't need to know.
290![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:36:23pm |
re: #272 joan
Steele is a very interesting guy. Definitely someone who could go far.
However, my dream GOP candidate for 2012: A black [yep, I said it] former military officer with a graduate degree in economics who runs a very successful business that he/she built from the ground up.
Where is he/she?
291![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:37:20pm |
re: #290 Occasional Reader
Is this person imaginary or real?
292![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:02pm |
re: #270 DaddyG
I have a unique take on the Gay Marriage issue...
We started down that slippery slope when we started to treat marital status as a category of tax exemption. Take the monetary benefit out of it and leave marriage to the Church where it belongs.
That being said I'd rather see partner benefits and civil unions vs. expanding the definition of marriage to cover whatever the morality de jour decides is kosher.
Aside from the ability to file taxes jointly, I can't think of anything a gay couple (or an unmarried straight couple) can't do by other legal means that a straight couple can do by marriage. Many major companies and state and local governments offer unmarried partner benefits. You can make anyone you want the beneficiary of your estate. You can give your partner power of attorney and authorize them to make medical decisions on your behalf. You can own property jointly. I think a civil union type of thing that encompasses all of that would be nice for one-stop shopping, but otherwise, gay couples can execute legal documents that give them many of the benefits of marriage. Maybe one of our illustrious lizard attorneys can correct me if I'm wrong here.
293![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:08pm |
re: #285 MandyManners
Oh, my goodness! Get rid of all electric outlets! Banish the toasters!
Especially those lethal high-capacity toasters! They have no legitimate purpose! I hereby designate them "assault toasters", and call for their immediate, nationwide banning.
294![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:24pm |
re: #285 MandyManners
Oh, my goodness! Get rid of all electric outlets! Banish the toasters!
Scientific study just concluded that shows living eventually causes death!
295![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:58pm |
re: #291 CalBear84
Is this person imaginary or real?
Possibly real. But, I don't know who he/she is yet. Let's put it that way, and be optimistic.
296![]() |
Hobbes Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:40:27pm |
re: #69 reine.de.tout
Oh, goodness.
My take on Jindal: He makes a better appearance at being a good public executive, than he does doing the actual job of being a public executive.
Don't get me wrong - we here in La. are much better off with Jindal than with Blanco, he has done much right.
But boy howdy - there have been some major screw-ups too, that should not have happened.
If you weren't in La. I'd think you were living in Illinois. Sounds like BHO except for "better off" and "has done much right" stuff.
297![]() |
Racer X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:40:33pm |
re: #290 Occasional Reader
Steele is a very interesting guy. Definitely someone who could go far.
However, my dream GOP candidate for 2012: A black [yep, I said it] former military officer with a graduate degree in economics who runs a very successful business that he/she built from the ground up.
Where is he/she?
Why not a person of hispanic decent?
298![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:40:52pm |
re: #259 Charles
Maybe one problem is that the leadership is out of step with the rank and file in the pro-life movement or with self-described "pro-lifers."
This certainly is the case among "pro-choicers," the vast majority of whom do NOT favor abortion-on-demand in the 3rd trimester or partial-birth abortion.
So what you end up with is two rigid, extreme positions adopted as platforms by the two major parties.
Pathetic.
(My personal view re abortion happens to be extreme, BTW, but I am foursquare in favor of having the laws decided by democratic means. This not only has the practical effect of the law more closely resembling the sentiment of the population at large......as opposed to what extremists on both sides want, but it allows me to have some imput. I can try to change hearts and minds. I can try to change popular sentiment by persuasion.)
300![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:41:47pm |
re: #282 formercorpsman
There are too many doomsdayers in the republican midsts right now. I offer a positive scenario that the Republicans are victims of their own success. GWB faced more big issues than any other president since FDR. I think he's steared the ship of state ok.
The Dems were succesful at being hysterical opposition, but they have no policies to govern by. All of Obama's campaign promises are populist ideas, but they are bat-shit stupid: Increase taxes for the productive, increase welfare and handouts for the unproductive, acquiese to your enemies. In all of history, those ideas have been tried over and over. Have they ever worked? No. Let the Dems govern for 4 years. Heck, they have already begun the mess with the damn Congress for the last 2 years. By the time 2012 comes, folks will be screaming for something better.
301![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:42:27pm |
re: #295 Occasional Reader
Sounds like a great idea for the main character of a book.
302![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:42:44pm |
re: #297 Racer X
Why not a person of hispanic decent?
Or that. Or both... black latino Republican! The moonbats would all spontaneously combust.
303![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:42:56pm |
re: #300 DeafDog
The Dems were succesful at being hysterical opposition,
So good that a sadly significant chunk of the eletorate thinks that the GOP controls congress: that the budgets and laws lately have been products of the GOP.
304![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:43:26pm |
re: #298 wolfie
. . .
(My personal view re abortion happens to be extreme, BTW, but I am foursquare in favor of having the laws decided by democratic means. This not only has the practical effect of the law more closely resembling the sentiment of the population at large......as opposed to what extremists on both sides want, but it allows me to have some imput. I can try to change hearts and minds. I can try to change popular sentiment by persuasion.)
By persuasion, by example, by being available to speak on the issues - lots of ways to try to change "popular" sentiment and help people make the right decisions.
306![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:43:57pm |
re: #289 nyc redneck
Risk assessment. Nothing more and nothing less.
307![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:44:27pm |
re: #303 Silhouette
Aggressive and willful stupidity, at your service.
308![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:44:45pm |
re: #288 CalBear84
Faux-Cons!
Obama's gonna give me a tax cut!
Our taxes are going to go up, but we will be gifted with a "stimulus check" from the democrats.
309![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:44:46pm |
310![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:45:24pm |
re: #304 reine.de.tout
By persuasion, by example, by being available to speak on the issues - lots of ways to try to change "popular" sentiment and help people make the right decisions.
One guy's mind was changed when he was scoffingly (word?) asking what he thought was a rhetorical question, "And if we don't have these abortions, whose going to take all these babies in adoption. You?" And half the hands in the room went up.
311![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:45:45pm |
re: #307 debutaunt
Aggressive and willful stupidity, at your service.
Isn't that simply a description of the world most days?
312![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:45:50pm |
re: #284 nyc redneck
this is exactly what i'm talking abt. not only is there a push to censor contemporary art but many masterpieces will be covered or moved to back rooms and locked away. they won't be readily available for leisurely viewing.
what a wonderful retirement plan you have lined up. i'd say go as soon as you can. who knows what europe will be like in 20 or 30 yrs. and i'm not just speaking of art.
I'd do it today if I could afford it. I've lived in Spain, where I saw some amazing works by Picasso; we couldn't afford to see the Prado on an E-3 salary, unfortunately. I've been to London twice and seen a ton of amazing works there. Right now I'm busy envying my daughter, who will be spending the spring semester in Florence. I may have to ship myself FedEx to tag along.
BTW, I'll be up your way for Thanksgiving week. First stop (besides Mom's house) is the Met and the Cloisters.
313![]() |
Biff Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:02pm |
re: #23 yochanan
wonder if we can go to alaska and start over ala ayn rand
This is an interesting point. Will Alaska become a conservative refuge state?
314![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:04pm |
re: #310 Silhouette
One guy's mind was changed when he was scoffingly (word?) asking what he thought was a rhetorical question, "And if we don't have these abortions, whose going to take all these babies in adoption. You?" And half the hands in the room went up.
heh. Lots and lots of people looking for a family.
315![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:42pm |
re: #311 Dianna
Isn't that simply a description of the world most days?
How is your depression coming along?
316![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:49pm |
re: #290 Occasional Reader
Nah, that black candidate thing is so yesterday.
Perhaps a Vietnamese dentist from Iowa?
An extra-terrestrial from New Mexico?
317![]() |
akak Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:50pm |
re: #283 CLLRusso
Refrain from Gaza op/ agreeing with the mayor.
You might want to start looking for a new hero.
318![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:59pm |
re: #308 FrogMarch
A rebate on my tax increase...how thoughtful of them.
319![]() |
BBev Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:47:20pm |
re: #289 nyc redneck
don't reveal that information.
he doesn't need to know.
I don't even give then my SS# it's none of there business and they never asked again.
320![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:47:34pm |
re: #306 Perplexed
Risk assessment. Nothing more and nothing less.
But a politically focused one.
Guns have a risk, but so too do many other things in the house that weren't on the questionaire. Things with much higher risks.
321![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:47:37pm |
re: #303 Silhouette
So good that a sadly significant chunk of the eletorate thinks that the GOP controls congress: that the budgets and laws lately have been products of the GOP.
They will keep blaming Bush for the next 4 years. I will not let them.
322![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:48:37pm |
re: #315 debutaunt
How is your depression coming along?
I've recovered my equanimity. Or at least as much as I've ever possessed; there are people who would tell you I don't actually have mental equilibrium (but they're wrong).
Of course, I'm corrosively cynical at the moment, but I hope to achieve amiable irony before the weekend is over.
323![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:48:46pm |
So I only punch myself when I take off the old spectacles?
I'm pretty safe until I go to sleep.
324![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:48:52pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Some of you will appreciate this:
I agree with almost every word of that op-ed. Speaking for myself, I still voted for the GOP this year because the alternative seemed worse. But this might be the last time for me if the GOP gets even deeper into the far-right religious agenda.
The writer is absolutely correct that separation of church and state is a core conservative value. But far too many conservatives seem to have drunk the Dobson Koolaid.
325![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:16pm |
re: #314 reine.de.tout
heh. Lots and lots of people looking for a family.
Mr. Silhouette promised me that if we win the lottery, we can adopt. Other folks dream of sports cars and mansions.
326![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:17pm |
re: #316 wolfie
Here's one they would never see coming:
A half-white, half-black muslim Hawaiian with...errr...nevermind
327![]() |
CommonCents Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:23pm |
re: #48 reine.de.tout
I read the comments on that article about the DISD. It seemed to me that Texas was about to have another revolution for independence from Mexico.
328![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:34pm |
329![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:40pm |
re: #197 Charles
I've always though that Roe should be repealed precisely to give the issue of abortion back to state legislatures. Here in New York, the legislature legalized abortion before Roe, so nothing would change.
Pro-life activists could then take the issue to their state legislatures, and a majority of the electorate in each state could determine public policy. I think public opinion on abortion has shifted left since Roe, so I wouldn't foresee radical changes except in states with a large Roman Catholic population such as Pennsylvania or Louisiana.
Empowering the federal government on domestic issues is the liberal agenda. We should be moving power from the feds to the states and the people.
330![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:49pm |
re: #309 nyc redneck
i wouldn't give it out.
Yep. Some of those questions are a NOYFB and I put in BS answers.
Seen the questionnaire for getting a job with the ONE? Lots of questions that are illegal to ask of any prospective employee.
331![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:00pm |
re: #312 doppelganglander
i think i'll be in town that wk end.
newsjunkie_ky is coming to town around that time.
if possible we could get together.
332![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:12pm |
re: #316 wolfie
An extra-terrestrial from New Mexico?
The ET barrier was already broken, at least in Congress.
333![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:20pm |
re: #322 Dianna
I've recovered my equanimity. Or at least as much as I've ever possessed; there are people who would tell you I don't actually have mental equilibrium (but they're wrong).
Of course, I'm corrosively cynical at the moment, but I hope to achieve amiable irony before the weekend is over.
would you like to borrow my old tee shirt that says "Normal is Boring" and has a drawing of an upside-down stick figure?
335![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:57pm |
re: #280 gmsc
A soft-headed physician who doesn't understand that McCain health care plan would have helped him immensely as a physician. In other words, an idiot.
336![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:03pm |
re: #319 BBev
I don't even give then my SS# it's none of there business and they never asked again.
that's the way i'd do it.
why do we want people knowing that info?
337![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:08pm |
re: #329 quickjustice
We need to get the feds out of state governments and to let the states run their own state pretty much they want to run them.
338![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:24pm |
re: #328 Dianna
Power tools, for instance!
Particularly when used by left-handed people.
Left-handedness in general.
339![]() |
Clutch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:35pm |
Dang, glad this week is over. Company whacked almost 5% of the workforce worldwide, but fortunately (?) only two of our team took it in the neck. Neither one of them deserved it.
So, screw it, going to eat and then to the movies with the family to watch something silly like the new Madagascar movie. Gotta love penguins that fix a warning light by whacking it with the flight manual...
340![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:44pm |
re: #337 Perplexed
We need to get the feds out of state governments and to let the states run their own state pretty much they want to run them.
Granholm or Obama-----SSDD
341![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:51pm |
re: #300 DeafDog
I will digress for a moment. I think if we are to honestly assess what turned this election the way it did, was not any of the arguments here.
In 1992, Bill Clinton had one thing right. "It is the economy stupid"
What did this election in, was the 50 year old crowd, who opened their 401K statement, and watched their earnings begin to evaporate. It was a stock market in free fall, people defaulting on their mortgages, and the Republicans were in power, so they are left holding the ball. That is just they way it goes. After that, I blame the media, because they were criminal in their negligence, and guilty of trying to make an election over the voters in this country.
Third, the Republicans deserve much of the blame, because they did not govern the way they promised to, once they were elected. When this population can be convinced that Obama is the more fiscally responsible of the candidates, we have major problems.
As well, McCain was a victim of his own legislation.
There is no easy fix.
342![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:03pm |
re: #333 Eowyn2
would you like to borrow my old tee shirt that says "Normal is Boring" and has a drawing of an upside-down stick figure?
I have that same t!
Somewhere, there's a bumper-sticker I never got around to attaching to anything that reads, "Normal people worry me."
344![]() |
WhiteRasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:14pm |
re: #330 Perplexed
The city of Halifax Nova Scotia was in trouble recently for asking prospective employees if they practice bestiality and/or incest.....
345![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:16pm |
re: #330 Perplexed
I've answered, "Why would you even ask this? Aren't you ashamed that this matters to you?"
346![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:29pm |
re: #9 sadhu
STS 126 launch is at 6:55pm EST
[Link: ping.fm...]
Thank you for this link. I've been watching it for over an hour.
Some of the best TV ever. So informative about what goes into a shuttle launch
347![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:46pm |
re: #337 Perplexed
We need to get the feds out of state governments and to let the states run their own state pretty much they want to run them.
I'd like that as long as the states don't show up on the steps of the Capitol wanting a handout when their little experiments go south.
348![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:05pm |
re: #335 quickjustice
A soft-headed physician who doesn't understand that McCain health care plan would have helped him immensely as a physician. In other words, an idiot.
He's not an idiot. He's deeply disturbed at the anti-freedom agenda of the religious right, and I agree with him on that.
349![]() |
Spare O'Lake Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:09pm |
re: #259 Charles
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christian groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
As a Canadian observer, may I say that the concept of having different abortion laws in each State seems to me to be a cop-out by the GOP?
Sure, it would wrest the issue away from the religious right wing of the party, but to what effect and for how long?
If the right to abortion on demand is to be as accessible as at most crossing a State line or two, then how can that possibly be acceptable to the religious right?
It seems to me that something as basic as abortion should be regulated, if at all, by universal Federal legislation.
Of course in Canada our Constitutional division of powers places the criminal law firmly in the Federal column, so maybe Americans have a different take on this.
350![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:27pm |
re: #338 Silhouette
You've clearly read some of the same statistics I have. It's a positive threat to one's longevity.
I figured out that one of the main problems is that lefties inevitably dodge the wrong way.
351![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:53pm |
re: #324 Charles
The GOP is in sorry shape. You end up with "bad" and "worse" decisions in the voting booth. I voted for McCain despite an inept campaign brightened only by Palin's presence. She was real.
352![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:58pm |
re: #322 Dianna
You DID see my small happy dance upthread for finally having actual possession of my Kimber, right?
You can happy with me, vicariously.
353![]() |
AceR Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:05pm |
Oops...posted this on a dying thread, so I am reposting it here. It's about my thoughts on Obama's relationship with Ayers, and others.
I may not be as "educated" as Ayers or Obama (high school diploma in 1969), but this much I know.
I have no "friends of the family", no "neighborhood acquaintances", no "pastor" and no "business relationships" with anyone who hates the people of this country as much as Ayers, Rezco, Khalidi, and Wright do.
My father (blue collar, sheet metal worker) told me when I was growing up that above all else, I will be judged by the people I associate with. It doesn't matter whether you agree with them or not. If you hang out with them, do business with them, visit them, and seek friendships with them, you will be perceived as being just like them.
Thankfully, I heeded my father's advice, and for the bulk of my career, I received security clearances based on numerous background investigations that occured every 5 years. And throughout my life, my common sense antenna has caused me to steer clear of a lot of bad "acquaintances" who register a 10 on the weird sh*t-o-meter scale. I wonder why Obama was drawn to those who register a 10?
Obama's associations with these thugs, cons, terrorists and racial bigots, would preclude him from ever obtaining a security clearance, because in the world of security clearances, your associations, acquaintances, friends---and even your pastor---matters. It also matters that he did "a little blow", but heh, he doesn't have to worry about getting any stupid old security clearances now, does he?
So now America will be led by a President who in the real world could never aspire to any position of employment that required even the most basic background investigation for security purposes. Doesn't leave me with a warm and fuzzy feeling. How about you?
Obama is con. He is disingenuous and it speaks to his lack of integrity. He doesn't want to have an honest dialogue with the American people about how he really feels about social justice, race, spreading the wealth, affirmative action, and the like, because if he tips his hand prematurely, he might not get the support he needs to ramrod his social programs through Congress in the next 4 years.
And so we must rely on Obama's sketchy resume, his friends and acquaintances and the business partners he surrounded himself with throughout his adult years, to try to get a picture of this man.
Yes, I have a picture of Obama and Michelle sitting in the Ayer's living room sipping a mocha latte after dinner, while they discuss the sad state of America and what should be done to fix it. Then later chatting over an aperitif about Tony Rezco and his fabulous business deals, Jeremiah Wright and his enthusiastic method of preaching the Gospel, and how Khalidi has so many interesting "friends" in the middle east.
Makes me sick.
354![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:27pm |
re: #350 Dianna
I figured out that one of the main problems is that lefties inevitably dodge the wrong way.
We say it all the time, but that one made me laugh out loud.
355![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:47pm |
re: #335 quickjustice
A soft-headed physician who doesn't understand that McCain health care plan would have helped him immensely as a physician. In other words, an idiot.
a physician ought to know a dead on arrival patient when he sees one.
McCain's healthcare plan would have been DOA to Pelosi's desk
356![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:57pm |
re: #346 Shug
Thank you for this link. I've been watching it for over an hour.
Some of the best TV ever. So informative about what goes into a shuttle launch
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
357![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:55:32pm |
I agree with the sentiment on this thread that it was counterproductive for Conservatives to sit out this election.
I was very disappointed that McCain got the nomination, but I put out a yard sign, voted for him & encouraged others to vote for him.
I will say though that McCain brought a lot of this on himself. He repeatedly knifed Republicans & ran a ridiculous campaign.
He refused to use the Wright issue & at one rally sounded like he was endorsing Obama.
As I see it the lesson is vote a real Republican next time. He or she does not have to be far right , but at least should you know, favor Republicans.
358![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:55:44pm |
re: #325 Silhouette
Mr. Silhouette promised me that if we win the lottery, we can adopt. Other folks dream of sports cars and mansions.
GOOD FOR YOU!
But why wait for the lottery? I guess adoption costs an arm and a leg.
Contact Catholic Charities in your area.
359![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:55:44pm |
re: #329 quickjustice
I agree.
Actually, the younger generation is decidedly less pro-abortion than the baby-boomer generation. But I can't see any state outlawing all abortions today, and most would be pretty liberal about 1st trimester ones.
360![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:07pm |
re: #344 WhiteRasta
The city of Halifax Nova Scotia was in trouble recently for asking prospective employees if they practice bestiality and/or incest.....
Must have been a quiet day for the person who generated the form - at least until one made its way to the local paper.
361![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:08pm |
re: #324 Charles
IMO, the social issues are a side-show to economic and foreign policy issues. That said, I agree that some of the hard-line polices on both sides are a turn-off. I hope the republican leader(s) who emerge moderate their stances on those policies. On the other hand, the in-your-face gay rights folks (and I relate them with the dems) are at least as offensive as the far right soc-cons.
362![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:10pm |
re: #352 Occasional Reader
You DID see my small happy dance upthread for finally having actual possession of my Kimber, right?
You can happy with me, vicariously.
I didn't, but I am not happy dancing for you!
Congratulations! Isn't it just the sweetest shooting handgun you've ever tried?
363![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:39pm |
re: #332 Occasional Reader
Dang! :D
The Vietnamese dentist it is, then!
364![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:57:09pm |
365![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:57:28pm |
re: #356 Fat Jolly Penguin
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
I saw STS-123 launch at night from the NASA causeway.
The coolest thing I've ever seen.
366![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:57:30pm |
re: #362 Dianna
I didn't, but I am not happy dancing for you!
Congratulations! Isn't it just the sweetest shooting handgun you've ever tried?
Well, I haven't shot it yet. I'll let you know after this weekend.
367![]() |
Racer X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:58:26pm |
re: #356 Fat Jolly Penguin
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
6:55 pm EST right?
368![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:58:48pm |
re: #348 Charles
Fair enough, but the doctor has an organization advocating for more medical autonomy. I'm more into the health care issues, and McCain's health plan would have given consumers far more control over their health care, and doctors far better control over patient care, than Obama's.
My point is that on the health care issue, he voted against his own interests, and those of his patients. And that's just sad.
369![]() |
Jack Reacher Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:13pm |
re: #302 Occasional Reader
Or that. Or both... black latino Republican! The moonbats would all spontaneously combust.
With a cabinet including "A black, a woman, two Jews and a cripple." Ah, James Watt; owner of an unregistered assault-mouth.
370![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:24pm |
re: #355 Shug
a physician ought to know a dead on arrival patient when he sees one.
McCain's healthcare plan would have been DOA to Pelosi's desk
Anything McCain would have proposed would have been DOA on Pelosi's desk. We lack people in government who put the country before politics.
371![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:37pm |
re: #356 Fat Jolly Penguin
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
I've seen three, and they are truly awe inspiring.
The first time, I was driving down 95 and didn't know about the launch. After we figured out what it was, we pulled on the side of the road with dozens of others and watched it climb under you could see it turn into a glowing dot of a satellite and move across the stars.
Given that one usually feels tiny and insignificant looking at the sky, it was a powerful moment, knowing that, tiny as we are, just little 5-6 ft squishy breakable things, yet we can touch the heavens.
373![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:51pm |
374![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:05pm |
re: #362 Dianna
Er, I think I meant that I am now happy dancing for OR, and his new possession.
375![]() |
Spare O'Lake Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:35pm |
re: #322 Dianna
I've recovered my equanimity. Or at least as much as I've ever possessed; there are people who would tell you I don't actually have mental equilibrium (but they're wrong).
Of course, I'm corrosively cynical at the moment, but I hope to achieve amiable irony before the weekend is over.
LOL. Take it from me, corrosive cynicism is OK - just keep a vat of antacid beside the computer.
376![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:49pm |
re: #341 formercorpsman
I totally agree. Upding!
The 2008 election turned on the financial meltdown and McCain's lack of glibness on the subject. The stunt McCain pulled before the first debate back-fired when he supported the $700B bailout. I said before that the republican primary hardly vetted the candidates on economics. That was our fault.
377![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:54pm |
re: #366 Occasional Reader
Well, I haven't shot it yet. I'll let you know after this weekend.
It's such a treat! Have fun.
378![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:01:07pm |
re: #331 nyc redneck
i think i'll be in town that wk end.
newsjunkie_ky is coming to town around that time.
if possible we could get together.
My schedule is horrendous (too many relatives, not enough time), but please email me. Met day is Sunday the 23rd; maybe coffee?
379![]() |
Racer X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:01:26pm |
381![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:01:52pm |
re: #233 doppelganglander
As an art lover, I worry about that a lot. If you removed every work with nudity or religious content from the Louvre, for example, all you'd have left are some butt-ugly modern works that look more like vandalism than art, and maybe a couple of still lifes. I am hoping to spend part of my retirement visiting the great cathedrals, palaces and museums of Europe, but I worry they may not be there in 20 or 30 years.
Venus in a Burka
David in a loin cloth
382![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:02:02pm |
383![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:02:25pm |
i'm working on my christmas cards now. they're so cute.
i love doing art. i'm using colored pencils and crayons.
and i feel 8yrs. old.
tho, these are pretty sophisticated potato prints.
384![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:02:39pm |
re: #364 formercorpsman
I voted straight R.
I can't say I was enthusiastic, but I did my duty.
I did too, but like you, not all that enthusiastic.
First I wanted Rudy, but he screwed up, then Romney , but the open state primaries killed him.
So we get McCain. The alternative though was too heinous.
385![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:07pm |
re: #365 Shug
I saw STS-123 launch at night from the NASA causeway.
The coolest thing I've ever seen.
Do they have observation points close enough to really feel the noise?
386![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:11pm |
damn,
I almost got to be here long enough to read 20 posts.
back to work
387![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:42pm |
re: #384 opnion
I wanted Thompson but his campaign was really lack-luster.
388![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:49pm |
re: #368 quickjustice
Yes because the issues of liberty in another arena outweighed those in his mind.
389![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:50pm |
re: #318 CalBear84
A rebate on my tax increase...how thoughtful of them.
It's a gift. Like if the dems stop blowing smoke in our face, it's the gift of fresh air.
390![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:25pm |
re: #376 DeafDog
Bingo.
I don't know anyone on any side of the political coin who liked the idea of the bailout.
I'm not saying something should not have been done, but they were going to own it no matter what.
391![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:39pm |
re: #349 Spare O'Lake
Of course in Canada our Constitutional division of powers places the criminal law firmly in the Federal column, so maybe Americans have a different take on this.
We do.
The US Constitution, when it was ratified, was a contract between sovereign states. A Virginian saw himself as a Virginian, as is evident from Thomas Jefferson's gravestone inscription.
For a variety of reasons (many technological in terms of transportation, communications and media) we have become a largely homogeneous place. That is, frankly, unfortunate. In that adoption of cultural homogeneity we have also allowed ourselves to get lulled into a false comfort of "federal assistance" which basically offers money to states for projects and programs in exchange for conforming to federal rules. It is a false exchange - the Federal Government has, over the course of time, simply taken a bigger chunk of the tax payments households make and then uses that increment to "give" to the states with strings. States have since learned to do the same to local governments.
The result of this "incentive system" is that we as individual Americans have far less influence on our laws and regulation - the power rests in Washington.
We are less free for it.
And our criminal laws mostly reside with the states.
392![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:47pm |
re: #387 Perplexed
I wanted Thompson but his campaign was really lack-luster.
He just seemed tired. But Ron Paul! Oh never mind.
393![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:48pm |
One night launch was at 1am, on a work night. But Mr. Silhouette and I were young, no kids, so we did the foolish thing and drove over from Tampa to see it.
I think I got to bed at 4am. Did I mention that work started at 7am?
394![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:05:12pm |
And on a lighter note:
[Link: www.theonion.com...]
395![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:05:36pm |
Speaking of space stuff, just found this on NASA's site: Hubble directly observes planet orbiting Fomalhaut
Estimated to be no more than three times Jupiter's mass, the planet, called Fomalhaut b, orbits the bright southern star Fomalhaut, located 25 light-years away in the constellation Piscis Australis, or the "Southern Fish."
Fomalhaut has been a candidate for planet hunting ever since an excess of dust was discovered around the star in the early 1980s by NASA's Infrared Astronomy Satellite, IRAS.
396![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:06:33pm |
re: #395 Fat Jolly Penguin
I saw Hubbel launched. I was driving in the morning commute in Orlando when it went up. Beautiful.
397![]() |
albusteve Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:06:53pm |
re: #352 Occasional Reader
You DID see my small happy dance upthread for finally having actual possession of my Kimber, right?
You can happy with me, vicariously.
me too?...and a bit envious as well
398![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:07:16pm |
re: #384 opnion
Now here is the kicker.
I am pro-life.
Killgore pretty much convinced me with his discussions, to vote for Guiliani.
I made my mind up. I was going to vote for him. I live in PA. By the time the primary came to us, it did not matter.
Where the hell does that put me?
399![]() |
Alberta Oil Peon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:07:39pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
And a national ban on abortions would simply force those women who wanted one to go across a border. Would they start demanding pregnancy tests of all women of childbearing age who wish to board a flight out of the country?
Abortion, ultimately, is a self-limiting problem. The class of people who accept abortion as legitimate, will for the most part, be those who choose to have abortions. That means they, as a group, will tend to have fewer offspring to indoctrinate with the pro-choice mindset.
IMHO, the worst thing about abortion is that it is wasteful. Wasteful of medical resources to solve a "problem" that a two-bit piece of rubber could have prevented; and worse, wasteful of human potential.
The socons are shooting themselves in the foot by belaboring this issue.
400![]() |
Miss Molly Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:07:39pm |
Protesters of prop 8 need to protest against the people who voted in favor of prop 8. 74% of those voting in favor of prop 8 voted for Obama.
401![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:08:01pm |
re: #393 Silhouette
One night launch was at 1am, on a work night. But Mr. Silhouette and I were young, no kids, so we did the foolish thing and drove over from Tampa to see it.
I think I got to bed at 4am. Did I mention that work started at 7am?
I've never seen a launch. But one of the returns came directly overhead our area, and we were able to clearly see the thing coming in. A very few minutes after it passed over us in La., it was landing in Fla. It was amazing, it was streaking across the sky.
402![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:08:32pm |
The thing that saddens me about this is that I know many religious conservatives who support pro-life positions -- when you get them away from the congregation and ask them quietly one on one they don't want to outlaw it completely however. It's a strange stance -- they would never consider an abortion, they support prolife candidates, but.... they want the option there.
The rabid ideologues at both ends of the spectrum shout down any voice of moderation in the Christian right however.
On Gay marriage most are horrified when I tell them they agree with Fred Phelps, just not the way he says it....
403![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:08:41pm |
re: #385 Soona'
Do they have observation points close enough to really feel the noise?
yes. you feel it !
I did a tour (Greyline) It was like 100$.
You get picked up from an Orlando Hotel, get on a bus. They take you to KSC. In my case it was like 7 hours before launch ( since the launch was after 2 AM ) so I got to tour KSC. They were even serving beers at the cafeteria
Then a few hours before the launch to reboard your bus and they take you to the causeway ( about 6 miles from the shuttle) Those tickets are very hard to get , but you can book a tour the day before the launch and get a seat.
The anticipation is absolutely amazing. About 30 seconds or so after launch you really hear the noise. I couldn't believe how loud it was. You can feel it.
Unfortunately for us, the shuttle disappeared into the clouds about 20 seconds after launch.
Then you get back on the bus and they take you to the hotel.
404![]() |
kansas Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:09:11pm |
Both parties have gone to far each way. Time for a return to sanity, although McCain was a piss poor alternativere: #398 formercorpsman
Now here is the kicker.
I am pro-life.
Killgore pretty much convinced me with his discussions, to vote for Guiliani.
I made my mind up. I was going to vote for him. I live in PA. By the time the primary came to us, it did not matter.
Where the hell does that put me?
Is there anybody who is not "pro life?" Republicans are headed for the wilderness.
405![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:09:25pm |
With the installation of the Obama administration, ACORN looks to be riding high.I don't think that anyone seriously believes the this is not a criminal organization.
The Federal government will not have interest in prosecution. How about State Attorney Generals?
406![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:09:35pm |
re: #228 Occasional Reader
There is some "line drawing" that comes into play, at some point.
Draw the line at flintlock pistols and muskets. That's what the Founding Fathers had, should be good enough for everyone else.
/
407![]() |
IslandLibertarian Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:09:36pm |
I'll be shopping this weekend.
Any recommendations for 22Mag semi-auto hand guns and/or rifles?
408![]() |
VegasRick Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:09:48pm |
re: #400 Miss Molly
Protesters of prop 8 need to protest against the people who voted in favor of prop 8. 74% of those voting in favor of prop 8 voted for Obama.
Those folks don't have the balls to protest in front of black churches.
409![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:09:52pm |
410![]() |
Tupac23X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:10:00pm |
Anybody have a clue how far away from the Cape the shuttle can be seen during a night launch? (I live near Ft Myers)
411![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:10:39pm |
re: #396 quickjustice
I saw Hubbel launched. I was driving in the morning commute in Orlando when it went up. Beautiful.
Awesome. Any idea when that servicing mission is supposed to launch? Last I heard was May '09.
412![]() |
WhiteRasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:10:44pm |
re: #360 Perplexed
It's definitely a case of, "What the hell were you thinking?"...
Thought up by a highly paid consultant, no doubt.
413![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:10:51pm |
re: #398 formercorpsman
Now here is the kicker.
I am pro-life.
Killgore pretty much convinced me with his discussions, to vote for Guiliani.
I made my mind up. I was going to vote for him. I live in PA. By the time the primary came to us, it did not matter.
Where the hell does that put me?
An unenthusiastic McCain supporter?
414![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:10:53pm |
416![]() |
VegasRick Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:12:54pm |
419![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:13:30pm |
re: #402 Thanos
The thing that saddens me about this is that I know many religious conservatives who support pro-life positions -- when you get them away from the congregation and ask them quietly one on one they don't want to outlaw it completely however. It's a strange stance -- they would never consider an abortion, they support prolife candidates, but.... they want the option there.
The rabid ideologues at both ends of the spectrum shout down any voice of moderation in the Christian right however.
On Gay marriage most are horrified when I tell them they agree with Fred Phelps, just not the way he says it....
Many religious conservatives (including this one) would prefer that abortions not happen, but understand the law is not going to change. Better for people holding a strong pro-life view to speak to it by example in their own life, by persuasion, by doing whatever they can to convince people a choice for life is the better choice. It's not that we want the option there - it's that we don't see that the law will be changed.
And many people who oppose gay marriage have no opposition at all to have a contractual system that would allow gay partners the same or similar rights and responsibilities as married couples. I am completely perplexed as to why the gay community does not see this as an option.
420![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:13:37pm |
421![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:13:53pm |
re: #402 Thanos
Thanos, your too much man./
I am one of those folks who can give on the subject. But I think you have it right. There are polarizing entities at both ends of the spectrum.
I also agree, it is a moral argument. I don't have the answers, I don't even pretend to.
What I do know is, most of the arguments used for wanting to keep it on demand are based upon the scenarios for which I can acquiesce.
The reality of it is, the overwhelming percentage of abortions in this country are for birth control.
422![]() |
leboaz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:14:19pm |
Been away for a few so sorry if this is a repeat. But, now that it has been proven that anyone can be elected President in this great country of ours, and the Government is in sore need of some cash, doesn't it seem like it's time to do away with a few very expensive organizations that are either directly paid for with government grants, or at the least supported by tax abatement programs? Maybe we should start a list.
How about #1. N.A.A.C.P.
424![]() |
Caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:14:55pm |
re: #410 Tupac23X
I saw a night launch back in 2000, I was near Gainesville.
425![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:15:33pm |
re: #422 leboaz
Been away for a few so sorry if this is a repeat. But, now that it has been proven that anyone can be elected President in this great country of ours, and the Government is in sore need of some cash, doesn't it seem like it's time to do away with a few very expensive organizations that are either directly paid for with government grants, or at the least supported by tax abatement programs? Maybe we should start a list.
How about #1. N.A.A.C.P.
The taxpayers pay for the N.A.A.C.P.? Link?
426![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:15:37pm |
Happy Friday y'all. I was at Cape Canaveral Air Force station when Challenger blew up. Being a kid of the 60s and early 70s, watching the Gemini and Apollo launches on TV was the highlight of a moon mad kid. So the navy sends me to a missle tracking ship at the Cape. 4th day there I'm gonna see a space launch LIVE! I was wound up. Then boom! Goddamn NASA asshat 'crats did not listen to the engineers who told them it was to frakkin' cold to launch.
427![]() |
VegasRick Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:15:47pm |
re: #422 leboaz
Been away for a few so sorry if this is a repeat. But, now that it has been proven that anyone can be elected President in this great country of ours, and the Government is in sore need of some cash, doesn't it seem like it's time to do away with a few very expensive organizations that are either directly paid for with government grants, or at the least supported by tax abatement programs? Maybe we should start a list.
How about #1. N.A.A.C.P.
#2 ACORN
428![]() |
Spare O'Lake Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:16:30pm |
re: #391 karmic_inquisitor
And our criminal laws mostly reside with the states.
What would happen if half the states had an outright ban, and the other half had abortion on demand?
Would the result not be chaotic? And even worse, would this not mean that abortion would be more accessible to the wealthy who could afford to pay the additonal costs associated with going "abortion-shopping"?
It just seems too weird, just like it would if murder was legal in some states and not in others.
429![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:16:41pm |
re: #407 IslandLibertarian
I'll be shopping this weekend.
Any recommendations for 22Mag semi-auto hand guns and/or rifles?
Not familiar with guns in that caliber, sorry. But the word Ruger comes to mind... I think they're pretty good with .22s?
430![]() |
Taqiyyotomist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:16:45pm |
re: #419 reine.de.tout
And many people who oppose gay marriage have no opposition at all to have a contractual system that would allow gay partners the same or similar rights and responsibilities as married couples. I am completely perplexed as to why the gay community does not see this as an option.
Because the Devil is involved, and he wants to corrupt the church at all costs, at all turns. Still perplexed?
432![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:18:06pm |
re: #430 Taqiyyotomist
Because the Devil is involved, and he wants to corrupt the church at all costs, at all turns. Still perplexed?
uh, yes.
434![]() |
Tupac23X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:19:11pm |
re: #424 Caliredst8r
Thanks. As the bird flies, I might have an outside chance of seeing something then, but it's p/cloudy so I'm not overly optimistic. Should have planned ahead and been there since I'm guessing this will be the last night launch or certainly one of the last. (I don't follow the space program schedule as closely as I used too)
436![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:19:47pm |
re: #430 Taqiyyotomist
Because the Devil is involved
"The Devil made me buy this [wedding] dress?"
(I'd prefer non-supernatural explanations, myself)
437![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:19:48pm |
re: #422 leboaz
Been away for a few so sorry if this is a repeat. But, now that it has been proven that anyone can be elected President in this great country of ours, and the Government is in sore need of some cash, doesn't it seem like it's time to do away with a few very expensive organizations that are either directly paid for with government grants, or at the least supported by tax abatement programs? Maybe we should start a list.
How about #1. N.A.A.C.P.
All I could find about the funding of the N.A.A.C.P. is that it is a tax-exempt organization.
438![]() |
CynicalConservative Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:19:58pm |
re: #407 IslandLibertarian
I'll be shopping this weekend.
Any recommendations for 22Mag semi-auto hand guns and/or rifles?
Try this, always enjoyed them.
439![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:20:03pm |
re: #421 formercorpsman
I agree, in debates I've been characterized as both a prolife zealot and an abortion on demand zealot by both sides. That's why it needs to go back to the states, after fifty years or so of differing legistlation in fifty states eventually the right balance of favoring life and liberty will be struck. That which works will become more adopted.
440![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:20:21pm |
re: #404 kansas
I am under no illusions. Seriously, think about what you are witnessing right before you.
Bill Ayres is being mainstreamed as we speak. In my eyes, this piece of shit is no different than the scum VB we talk about here.
This is a guy, part of a group, who has no regrets about his actions. None. Zombie did an excellent job, in highlighting his ambitions in "Prairie Fire"
When you have someone like this, and don't kid yourself, he has a following, rationalizing things like how long the state should allow someone to live because of world resources, or something of the like is not out of the questions.
If he is ok with his option for his estimated 25 million people refusing reeducation, than I would suspect his morality compass is a roulette wheel.
441![]() |
lobo91 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:20:35pm |
re: #429 Occasional Reader
Not familiar with guns in that caliber, sorry. But the word Ruger comes to mind... I think they're pretty good with .22s?
They used to make a .22 magnum version of the 10/22, but it's no longer in production.
Might be able to find one at a dealer, though. Or a gun show.
442![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:20:46pm |
re: #428 Spare O'Lake
Not the same in importance, but we do have states with vastly different laws about things like fireworks. This one sells them, this one not at all.
Yet is isn't just the rich and priviledged who can "afford" to go get fireworks in other states. In fact, fireworks purchase is typically associated with the blue collar types.
443![]() |
NYCHardhat Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:21:16pm |
Do you have any links in regards to Obamas campaign financing. Middleeastern money, etc?
444![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:21:24pm |
re: #413 opnion
Like I said, I did my duty. I have no right to say anything if I don't vote.
445![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:21:24pm |
re: #235 wolfie
That's not enough. You have to approve of the choices they make, you see. The same thing is the basic level of conflict on the gay marriage issue. A large enough percentage of the populace is at a point where they are comfortable with "domestic partnerships" or whatever that you could get them in almost every state. say 40 of the 50 States (kind of like 40 of the 50 States have Concealed Carry to one degree or another).
OTOH, a large enough majority of the populace is not comfortable with calling it marriage. So uncomfortable that even in Liberal California they amended the Constitution of the State to keep the Judicary from forcing it on them.
It's not really the term "marriage" that is the problem, but whether or not people approve of the conduct. It isn't sufficient to say "Do what you like, but don't expect me to approve". They want to force the people to approve. That such a thing is really impossible doesn't seem to make the least bit of difference.
446![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:21:43pm |
447![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:22:03pm |
The whole Pro Choice / Pro Life debate in this election was divisive & to me missed the point.
The big issue should have been Infanticide. Other than Obama can you think of any candidate that would deny medical attention to a new born?
Whenever anyone mentioned it an Obama supporter would scream, "Do you really think that he supports infanticide?" It was always the same, the accuser would be silenced.
The correct answer should have been, "Why yes I do believe that & so do you."
448![]() |
leboaz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:22:14pm |
re: #437 MandyManners
That's what I meant by tax abatement. Sorry. Should have been more clear.
449![]() |
LoFlyer Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:22:56pm |
re: #438 CynicalConservative
Try this, always enjoyed them.
Ruger 10/22 carbine, mate. Burned many a brick through the barrel of 'me trusty .22 when I was a teen!
450![]() |
Tupac23X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:23:04pm |
By the way I'd like to add to any mention of the terrorist Bill Ayers, anywhere, that Bill can kiss my a$$ and PBUH. (Piss Be Among Him)
451![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:23:34pm |
Can someone please explain to me why when a marriage license is granted and certified by the state, city, or county, it matters if it's called a civil ceremony or a marriage?
452![]() |
Taqiyyotomist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:23:41pm |
Sombody puts a plate of poo, and a poo sandwich in front of you, and says, quite seriously, "If you don't pick one, you can't complain about what's for dinner."
B.S. I can't.
454![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:24:03pm |
re: #444 formercorpsman
Like I said, I did my duty. I have no right to say anything if I don't vote.
true
455![]() |
Caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:24:13pm |
re: #434 Tupac23X
It was very bright and visible even from where I was. I had one of those blue spots in front of my eyes, like from a camera flash, for about 15 minutes afterwards.
456![]() |
CynicalConservative Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:24:21pm |
re: #449 LoFlyer
Ruger 10/22 carbine, mate. Burned many a brick through the barrel of 'me trusty .22 when I was a teen!
Agree, uncounted bricks burned here as well.
457![]() |
eon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:24:24pm |
re: #407 IslandLibertarian
I'll be shopping this weekend.
Any recommendations for 22Mag semi-auto hand guns and/or rifles?
Good evening, Lizards.
The only .22 Magnum semi-auto rifle I know of is the Marlin 922M. It is an excellent arm, but AFAIK out of production. Expect to pay about $350-400 for one in used but mint condition.
As for .22 Magnum semi-auto pistols, the Irwindale Arms AutoMag II and the Grendel P-30 were the only such pistols ever commercially available. Both are also OOP. Of the two, the AutoMag II would probably be easier to find as it was produced for about ten years- the Grendel was only made for about two years before the 1993 Assault Weapons Ban. BTW, the "P-30" in the Grendel's name comes from the fact that it has a 30-shot magazine, which was why the AWB 86'd it. The P-30 was made mostly of stampings and polymers, whereas the AutoMag II was all stainless steel. Either one can be a bit pricey, on the used market.
If you're not irresistibly wedded to semi-auto, lever-action and bolt-action .22 WMR rifles, and both single-action and double-action revolvers in .22 WMR, are still made by several gunmakers and can be ordered through your local dealer, if indeed he doesn't already have them in stock.
cheers
eon
458![]() |
HoosierHoops Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:24:35pm |
re: #415 goddessoftheclassroom
Good evening, Lizards.
{Goddess}
Well it's friday..we made it through another work week..
How are you doing this fine evening?
459![]() |
Russkilitlover Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:24:55pm |
Afternoon, all. I've missed all of today - being out and about in a never ending job search!
I'm sorry I missed the GMA thread, although I certainly would not have had the stomach to watch it.
What I'd like to ask Good Morning America is if they would have had a cozy chat with Tim McVeigh. Aren't Ayers and McVeigh the same souls? This mainstreaming of this f*cking coward terrorist is disturbing, to say the least.
460![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:25:44pm |
re: #221 Occasional Reader
Excellent. Maybe one day you won't need a piece of paper to exercise what the Supreme Court has said is your Constitutional Right.
461![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:25:45pm |
re: #459 Russkilitlover
Afternoon, all. I've missed all of today - being out and about in a never ending job search!
I'm sorry I missed the GMA thread, although I certainly would not have had the stomach to watch it.
What I'd like to ask Good Morning America is if they would have had a cozy chat with Tim McVeigh. Aren't Ayers and McVeigh the same souls? This mainstreaming of this f*cking coward terrorist is disturbing, to say the least.
They would have treated Sarah Palin with hostility byt Bill Ayers, they were cordial
462![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:26:15pm |
re: #445 Iron Fist
And while many companies offer benefits to domestic partnerships, many do not. But if they were legal marriages recognized by the state, those other business would lose the right to not recognize them.
It isn't about tolerance: you believe what you want over there and I'll beleive what I want over here. It is about making disapproval illegal.
463![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:26:33pm |
re: #460 Iron Fist
Excellent. Maybe one day you won't need a piece of paper to exercise what the Supreme Court has said is your Constitutional Right.
And they're still not playing ball here on the "... and bear" part of that equation.
464![]() |
goddessoftheclassroom Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:26:46pm |
MandyManners, HoosierHoops, et al:
My throat is killing me and I feel crummy, but it's just a cold, thank goodness. I'm having a superearly night to get some extra sleep.
465![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:27:23pm |
466![]() |
Russkilitlover Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:27:30pm |
re: #451 Thanos
Can someone please explain to me why when a marriage license is granted and certified by the state, city, or county, it matters if it's called a civil ceremony or a marriage?
The gay community is not satisfied with civil ceremony. To them it still separates them from other "committed couples." They want the marriage moniker and nothing less.
468![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:28:07pm |
re: #448 leboaz
That's what I meant by tax abatement. Sorry. Should have been more clear.
What other organizations should we deny tax exempt status to just because a member of the group for which the organization advocates is successful? NOW 'cause Madeline (sp?) Allbright and Condoleeza Rice made it to State? What about AARP since both McCain and Biden are senior citizens? Sen. McCain is disabled so, should we exclude any organization that advocates for disabled people? What about vets? Ben Knighthorse Campbell is a Native American.
Why stop with one?
469![]() |
LoFlyer Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:28:53pm |
re: #456 CynicalConservative
Agree, uncounted bricks burned here as well.
What really honed 'me skills was the Crossman 760 pump BB gun. When the sites fell off I got to be a really great shot. Talk about cost-effective mate!
470![]() |
Tupac23X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:28:57pm |
re: #455 Caliredst8r
It was very bright and visible even from where I was. I had one of those blue spots in front of my eyes, like from a camera flash, for about 15 minutes afterwards.
Hey that sounds much more promising! Unfortunately I don't have a lens adequate for night pictures but I'll take anything I can get.
471![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:29:32pm |
re: #445 Iron Fist
Yup. It is an aggressive attempt to force agreement and approval, not a defense of freedom at all.
472![]() |
LoFlyer Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:30:02pm |
re: #464 goddessoftheclassroom
MandyManners, HoosierHoops, et al:
My throat is killing me and I feel crummy, but it's just a cold, thank goodness. I'm having a superearly night to get some extra sleep.
Arrr, hope you feel better mate, er, Goddess!
473![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:30:11pm |
re: #459 Russkilitlover
I think him more akin to Charles Manson. Same era, same statements about starting a race war so the whites could be defeated, same idea of murdering people to get it started.
I don't know if Manson plotted the extermination of 25 million capitalists, so many Chuck is a little better.
That and Dohrn thinks the Mansons were waaaay cool and thinks the murdered people were pigs.
474![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:31:03pm |
GAH. Gotta' get to the pharmacy before it closes.
475![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:31:07pm |
re: #466 Russkilitlover
The gay community is not satisfied with civil ceremony. To them it still separates them from other "committed couples." They want the marriage moniker and nothing less.
So explain to me what the difference is and why you don't want them to achieve that?
476![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:31:22pm |
re: #466 Russkilitlover
What has really distrubed me, is the physical backlash we are seeing by certain groups claiming victim status.
As nothing surprises me anymore, if gay marriage becomes legal, it would not phase me one bit, to see these same thugs assaulting people during church services, then demand the church to perform the ceremony.
If you do what they did, civil disobedience is not an issue for you.
477![]() |
HoosierHoops Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:31:25pm |
re: #464 goddessoftheclassroom
MandyManners, HoosierHoops, et al:
My throat is killing me and I feel crummy, but it's just a cold, thank goodness. I'm having a superearly night to get some extra sleep.
I hope you get feeling better Goddess. Last Tuesday i woke up with such a sore throat and could not hardly talk..Then it went away the next day..
Guess i got lucky..hope you do also.
Kind regards
478![]() |
lobo91 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:31:31pm |
re: #466 Russkilitlover
The gay community is not satisfied with civil ceremony. To them it still separates them from other "committed couples." They want the marriage moniker and nothing less.
Personally, I suspect that the divorce lawyers are secretly backing the whole gay marriage push.
It would open up a whole untapped market for them...
479![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:31:41pm |
re: #474 MandyManners
GAH. Gotta' get to the pharmacy before it closes.
This is America! Pharmacies are open 24 hours.
480![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:32:05pm |
re: #270 DaddyG
I have a unique take on the Gay Marriage issue...
We started down that slippery slope when we started to treat marital status as a category of tax exemption. Take the monetary benefit out of it and leave marriage to the Church where it belongs.
That being said I'd rather see partner benefits and civil unions vs. expanding the definition of marriage to cover whatever the morality de jour decides is kosher.
Sorry, there's no "tax exemption" for marriage. In many (but certainly not all) cases, married couples pay higher taxes than two unmarried individuals filing separately would. That's why they call it a "marriage penalty."
481![]() |
Born Again Republican Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:32:20pm |
re: #324 Charles
What do we do when Americans face extinction due to low birth rate? There are many countries already on this path. How does a country that embraces individual freedom in this matter try and to instill a greater purpose of survival of the race?
As it is, the majority of American children are being born to people who live off welfare. How do you change this pattern? By pushing for more freedom of abortion?
Maybe I'm looking at this wrong.
482![]() |
Russkilitlover Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:33:12pm |
re: #473 Silhouette
I think him more akin to Charles Manson. Same era, same statements about starting a race war so the whites could be defeated, same idea of murdering people to get it started.
I don't know if Manson plotted the extermination of 25 million capitalists, so many Chuck is a little better.
That and Dohrn thinks the Mansons were waaaay cool and thinks the murdered people were pigs.
re: #473 Silhouette
To me he is purely a less successful McVeigh. Manson had his cockamamy ideas about a race war, but McVeigh and Ayers acted on their dissatisfaction with government. McVeigh/Ayers kindred souls.
I think him more akin to Charles Manson. Same era, same statements about starting a race war so the whites could be defeated, same idea of murdering people to get it started.
I don't know if Manson plotted the extermination of 25 million capitalists, so many Chuck is a little better.
That and Dohrn thinks the Mansons were waaaay cool and thinks the murdered people were pigs.
483![]() |
razorbacker Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:33:43pm |
re: #406 Moe Katz
Draw the line at flintlock pistols and muskets. That's what the Founding Fathers had, should be good enough for everyone else.
/
And parchment and quill pens for the 1st Amendment. Cause, you know, that's all the Founding Fathers had.
484![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:34:11pm |
re: #481 Born Again Republican
What do we do when Americans face extinction due to low birth rate? There are many countries already on this path. How does a country that embraces individual freedom in this matter try and to instill a greater purpose of survival of the race?
As it is, the majority of American children are being born to people who live off welfare. How do you change this pattern? By pushing for more freedom of abortion?
Maybe I'm looking at this wrong.
But we aren't below replacement rate, sorry bad argument there.
485![]() |
bulwrk Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:34:34pm |
re: #441 lobo91
Ruger made a 44 cal carbine that would just about dislocate your shoulder if you weren't careful when you fired it.
486![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:35:15pm |
re: #480 Lynn B.
Sorry, there's no "tax exemption" for marriage. In many (but certainly not all) cases, married couples pay higher taxes than two unmarried individuals filing separately would. That's why they call it a "marriage penalty."
I've heard of older couples, married for decades, divorcing but living together. Extra SS benefits I read.
487![]() |
Russkilitlover Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:35:32pm |
re: #475 Thanos
So explain to me what the difference is and why you don't want them to achieve that?
Actually, I support gay marriage. I don't see the right's fear that if we call a gay union a marriage that all hell will break loose. I was merely stating what I've heard from personal friends who are active in the gay community and other friends who freak out at the thought of gays marrying.
488![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:35:40pm |
re: #463 Occasional Reader
In the fullness of time. We've just gotten our Roe v. Wade. Now we have to keep going back, getting more each time, until the right to keep, and, indeed, to bear arms is as protected as the right to abortion.
489![]() |
Tupac23X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:36:01pm |
re: #467 CalBear84
Spicoli avatar...love it.
Thanks. :)
I've always loved the irony of the dopehead versus him being Just A Plain Dope. I think the expression on my avatar accurately reflects my opinion on his view of the world, if that makes any sense.
"You D%#&"
490![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:36:20pm |
re: #482 Russkilitlover
Ayers has said the same things about race wars.
491![]() |
HoosierHoops Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:36:20pm |
re: #483 razorbacker
And parchment and quill pens for the 1st Amendment. Cause, you know, that's all the Founding Fathers had.
Did the founding fathers have 73" hi-def TV's?
otherwise.. forget about it!
492![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:36:23pm |
re: #287 Soona'
I think it's more about frustration over the fact that close to nothing has been done to try to overturn Roe vs. Wade. Liberal SCOTUS or not, there just hasn't been anyone that wants to impose on the court to change that decision. Maybe it's the only route they think they have. I don't agree with it, but I can understand.
We haven't had a "liberal SCOTUS" for quite a while now.
And that's not the way it works.
493![]() |
leboaz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:36:37pm |
re: #468 MandyManners
Help! I'm an old native American! You and I agree on pretty much everything. I'm just sayin' that some outfits have gotten millions- no billions- off the theory that their members don't stand a chance in this 'cruel' country. And worse, they then spend it on people like Jesse Jackson and other 'organizers'.
494![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:37:02pm |
re: #487 Russkilitlover
Actually, I support gay marriage. I don't see the right's fear that if we call a gay union a marriage that all hell will break loose. I was merely stating what I've heard from personal friends who are active in the gay community and other friends who freak out at the thought of gays marrying.
Ok that's what I"m asking, I'm hoping someone on the right opposed to gay marriage can explain to me why the distinction.
495![]() |
Russkilitlover Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:38:16pm |
re: #490 Silhouette
Ayers has said the same things about race wars.
Maybe. But that wasn't the purpose of his movement or his actions of bombings. He was protesting government actions/policies.
496![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:40:56pm |
re: #445 Iron Fist
That's not enough. You have to approve of the choices they make, you see. The same thing is the basic level of conflict on the gay marriage issue. A large enough percentage of the populace is at a point where they are comfortable with "domestic partnerships" or whatever that you could get them in almost every state. say 40 of the 50 States (kind of like 40 of the 50 States have Concealed Carry to one degree or another).
OTOH, a large enough majority of the populace is not comfortable with calling it marriage. So uncomfortable that even in Liberal California they amended the Constitution of the State to keep the Judicary from forcing it on them.
It's not really the term "marriage" that is the problem, but whether or not people approve of the conduct. It isn't sufficient to say "Do what you like, but don't expect me to approve". They want to force the people to approve. That such a thing is really impossible doesn't seem to make the least bit of difference.
Good points.
497![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:41:29pm |
re: #292 doppelganglander
I think a civil union type of thing that encompasses all of that would be nice for one-stop shopping, but otherwise, gay couples can execute legal documents that give them many of the benefits of marriage. Maybe one of our illustrious lizard attorneys can correct me if I'm wrong here.
Here are a few. (You have to scroll down. And while she mentions estate tax, gift tax is also an issue.)
Of course, the economic issues are only a small part of the picture.
498![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:42:39pm |
re: #494 Thanos
Thanos, this was my discussion from last week, but it might take going back to comments responded, to get a more precise understanding.
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
I am heading home, catch you guys later tonight.
499![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:43:14pm |
re: #476 formercorpsman
And on the flip side, there are gay people who aren't trying to get in people's faces about it. 5-6 years ago one of the customers we had for one of our software packages was a National Guardsman (well, woman) who was being shipped out to Iraq. She was a lesbian, had a picture on her desk of heself and her significant other at their "wedding" on her desk.
And she was shipping out to defend this country. That kind of thing puts a more human face on the issue. But she wasn't trying to force me to condone anything about her life, let alone approve. If more of the gays were like her (as opposed to the Folsom Street Fair crowd) there would be less opposition to the concept.
The Left have tried (and basically succeeded) to turn the Courts into a bludgeon to beat down all opposition to anything they try to do. In that kind of environment, it is no surprise people are turning to Constitutional Amendments to try and maintain control of issues.
500![]() |
funky chicken Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:46:11pm |
re: #170 karmic_inquisitor
I think the issue of abortion should be argued from a federalist perspective.
Before Roe (where rights were created out of thin air) the states regulated abortion. Roe took it away. What is wrong with letting the states decide - especially when the states are the ones on the hook for the consequences.
Roe short circuited democracy, just as the fabrication of a same sex marriage right was fabricated by the courts here. Many who voted for 8 did it because the courts had pissed them off.
The theme for 2010 should be "let us decide". The Democrats are trying to institute "Soft Paternalism" but paternalism is paternalism. Let states make more decisions. Let individuals make more decisions. Get the social engineers in congress and the courts out of the way.
What is the point of fighting for a free country when the federal government appoints itself to make decisions for you?
hear, hear!
501![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:50:18pm |
re: #492 Lynn B.
Um, no. We've had a Liberal Court since the Warren Court. The Liberal control has waxed and waned, but it is still a pretty liberal court. The originla Roe v. Wade decision would have allowed regulation of at least third trimester abortion, maybe second trimester (I don't have time to look it up right now). The last time the Court heard an abortion case that I'm aware of Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the Opinion, and it protected the right to an abortion.
Heller, the only "right" decision handed down recently, was 5-4, but this is the same Court that decided the State of Louisana couldn't execute child rapists.
If you consider the current Court to be right-wing that says more about how far Left you are than it does the composition of the Court.
502![]() |
Spare O'Lake Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:51:46pm |
re: #442 Silhouette
Not the same in importance, but we do have states with vastly different laws about things like fireworks. This one sells them, this one not at all.
Yet is isn't just the rich and priviledged who can "afford" to go get fireworks in other states. In fact, fireworks purchase is typically associated with the blue collar types.
I guess it depends on the cost. Fireworks would cost a lot less than an out or state abortion.
Here's an oldie for ya.
503![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:53:53pm |
re: #499 Iron Fist
We agree 100%.
I am not one of those people who say they have gay friends for posterity, I do have people I am friendly with who happen to be gay.
My contention, again, comes with how this does not just stop at the issue of granting the right to marry. The legislation to follow something like this would be huge. It becomes precedent. It would eventually infringe upon anyone who disagrees with the lifestyle, but is willing to live and let live.
The issue itself anymore is not about tolerance. It will be mandated acceptance. We already see textbooks being gender neutralized. It will be a concerted effort to blurr the models as we know it now.
Just the other day, I was watching some show I can't remember the name of now with my kids. Carly or something. No doubt, geared towards the pre-teen ages.
They were joking around, and a prize was a picture of that pregnant man.
My kids, 11,9, and 7 still don't get the whole pregnant thing, but writing that into a kids show is beyond reproach.
504![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:54:35pm |
re: #502 Spare O'Lake
I presume that you think that if I can't afford one the State should supply me with a belt-fed machinegun. Cool! I'll go for that, because I can't afford one.
If you don't, then you have a position that is hard to defend. Just because out of State abortions could be expensive doesn't mean that you have a right that the State must enforce.
505![]() |
BBev Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:55:08pm |
re: #330 Perplexed
Yep. Some of those questions are a NOYFB and I put in BS answers.
Seen the questionnaire for getting a job with the ONE? Lots of questions that are illegal to ask of any prospective employee.
I hear ya there but being a Conservative gun touting Republican is a pulse where I work , very good people.
506![]() |
goddessoftheclassroom Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:55:21pm |
re: #503 formercorpsman
Do you mean "beyond the pale?"
I agree.
507![]() |
funky chicken Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:56:12pm |
re: #324 Charles
Aargh. That's the kind of voter who should have voted for McCain/Palin (small government, pro-growth policies) but gleefully voted against Marilyn Musgrave. That woman is absolutely nuts, and an embarrassment. I lived in CO for 4 years and got to where I cringed any time I heard her name...because it meant she had come out with another hairbrained "proposal" re: homosexuality or abortion or "traditional values" or whatever.
Bob Shaffer is definitely a serious conservative, but I no longer live in CO and don't know if he was anywhere near as awful as Musgrave.
508![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:56:16pm |
re: #499 Iron Fist
Moreover, I would like to see people like Degeneres, and other folks in positions of prominence come out in the same fashion as we do here, against people with nefarious intentions, such as those doing what they did in the name of prop8.
509![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:57:34pm |
re: #506 goddessoftheclassroom
I know, go to the corner.
Yes, you caught me. I also made another mistake in a previous post, but I'll just let that fly under the radar.
I think I need to get my butt out of this chair, and head home.
510![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:57:55pm |
re: #322 Dianna
I've recovered my equanimity. Or at least as much as I've ever possessed; there are people who would tell you I don't actually have mental equilibrium (but they're wrong).
Of course, I'm corrosively cynical at the moment, but I hope to achieve amiable irony before the weekend is over.
Amiable irony - don't we all wish we had a bunch of that?
511![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:57:56pm |
re: #480 Lynn B.
Sorry, there's no "tax exemption" for marriage. In many (but certainly not all) cases, married couples pay higher taxes than two unmarried individuals filing separately would. That's why they call it a "marriage penalty."
There's no income tax exemption for marriage. There most definitely is an estate tax exemption (unlimited, in fact).
512![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:58:13pm |
re: #503 formercorpsman
Yeah. I used to be pro-Gay Marriage, but the last few years have changed that for basically the reasons you point out. It doesn't stop at live and let live. It will be used as a weapon to attack many of the norms of society.
Andrew Sullivan is actually who convinced me of this. He doesn't really deny this (or at least he hadn't by the time I quit bothering to read him), but sees it as a feature, not a bug.
513![]() |
goddessoftheclassroom Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:58:18pm |
re: #509 formercorpsman
I hope I didn't come across as nit-picky--I just wanted to be sure I understood what you meant.
514![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:58:31pm |
re: #361 DeafDog
IMO, the social issues are a side-show to economic and foreign policy issues. That said, I agree that some of the hard-line polices on both sides are a turn-off. I hope the republican leader(s) who emerge moderate their stances on those policies. On the other hand, the in-your-face gay rights folks (and I relate them with the dems) are at least as offensive as the far right soc-cons.
How so?
515![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:59:12pm |
re: #513 goddessoftheclassroom
Too late my feelings are hurt ;)
516![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:00:28pm |
re: #501 Iron Fist
Um, no. We've had a Liberal Court since the Warren Court. The Liberal control has waxed and waned, but it is still a pretty liberal court. The originla Roe v. Wade decision would have allowed regulation of at least third trimester abortion, maybe second trimester (I don't have time to look it up right now). The last time the Court heard an abortion case that I'm aware of Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the Opinion, and it protected the right to an abortion.
Heller, the only "right" decision handed down recently, was 5-4, but this is the same Court that decided the State of Louisana couldn't execute child rapists.
If you consider the current Court to be right-wing that says more about how far Left you are than it does the composition of the Court.
To the contrary. If you consider the current Court to be left-wing that says more about how far Right you are than it does the composition of the Court.
Not that that needed clarification.
Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy (more or less) makes a majority.
517![]() |
funky chicken Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:00:55pm |
re: #504 Iron Fist
I want a Dutch Warmblood, already trained for hunter jumper events.
It's only $40,000 or so. I think the feds should be happy to oblige me. I'm a really nice person.
518![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:01:10pm |
Nobody's taken a real stab at why the difference between civil and marriage matters yet.
I know quite a few gays, I work in the call center business and for some reason many concentrate there.
Most gays are definitely not like the obnoxious in your face Folsom crowd or the gay activists you see portrayed. Most are just your average american that I've met. The real problem with being gay is that there isn't stability and commitment that they can count on. So they end up with the Folsom st fair crowd and like controlling the agenda. The other key thing I'd like to point out is that the stigma of being gay isn't there much anymore with young people (30 and under). If you take a moment to think about what that portends for the future of conservatism, it should give you pause.
519![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:01:57pm |
re: #508 formercorpsman
I don't think that is likely to ever happen. If you look at the Prop 8 thing, you had gay rights people talking about blacks in a manner indistingushable from the Ku Klux Klan. It's a free country, but I by God am going to judge them on it.
If the more "moderate" gays haven't condemned that, I don't think they're going to condemn lesser breaches of conduct.
520![]() |
Spare O'Lake Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:02:14pm |
re: #504 Iron Fist
I presume that you think that if I can't afford one the State should supply me with a belt-fed machinegun. Cool! I'll go for that, because I can't afford one.
If you don't, then you have a position that is hard to defend. Just because out of State abortions could be expensive doesn't mean that you have a right that the State must enforce.
That is not my position. My position is that there should be a universal law governing abortion so that all Americans are subject to the same law and these anomalies and loopholes would then not exist.
521![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:03:13pm |
re: #495 Russkilitlover
He was protesting government actions/policies.
It was so much more than that. From thie own words
bombing a bank "in solidarity with striking Puerto Rican cement workers" and bombing a federal office building due to "the need for women to take control of daycare, healthcare, birth control and other aspects of women's daily lives,"
And they upfront and openly state that were a "guerrilla communist organization" that wanted to "seize power" of the US through violent takeover.
And in case anyone thinks that means taking power by legitimate means:
The only path to the final defeat of imperialism and the building of socialism is revolutionary war.
As for race war,
One of them, a group calling itself Weatherman, was elected to SDS leadership and proclaimed that the time had come to launch a race war on behalf of the Third World and against the United States. The Weatherman declared "war on AmeriKKKa" at its Flint War Council in 1969.The new entity dissolved Hayden's Students for a Democratic Society and formed a terrorist cult in its place, which was given the name Weather Underground.
Ayers isn't just a member of the Weathermen.
522![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:03:21pm |
re: #492 Lynn B.
We haven't had a "liberal SCOTUS" for quite a while now.
Well, I wouldn't call the current SCOTUS conservative either. See Boumediene, Kelo et al. The swing justice, Kennedy, is more libertarian than anything, I think.
523![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:04:09pm |
re: #419 reine.de.tout
...
And many people who oppose gay marriage have no opposition at all to have a contractual system that would allow gay partners the same or similar rights and responsibilities as married couples. I am completely perplexed as to why the gay community does not see this as an option.
Would you?
/yuck, I hate disagreeing with you ...
524![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:06:53pm |
re: #516 Lynn B.
So you don't think the Court forbiding Louisana from executing child rapists is going too far Left? Interesting. What about the terrorist rights case, Boumadine?
That is to the Right to you? Again, interesting. What do you consider Leftwing? Short of nationalizing all means of production and instituting a dictatorship of the Proletariate.
525![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:08:31pm |
re: #520 Spare O'Lake
What is your constitutional basis for this reasoning? What gives the Federal government the right to tell the States what they must do?
526![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:11:05pm |
re: #522 David Simon
Well, I wouldn't call the current SCOTUS conservative either. See Boumediene, Kelo et al. The swing justice, Kennedy, is more libertarian than anything, I think.
Yeah, you may well be right about Kennedy, but he tends to side more with the right than the left. Kelo was decided by a different court and who understands that decision anyway?
The thing about the SCOTUS that many people (not directed at you) don't always seem to understand is that ideology isn't supposed to be the principle that guides their decisions. It often comes out looking that way but not always.
527![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:11:06pm |
re: #518 Thanos
Most gays are definitely not like the obnoxious in your face Folsom crowd or the gay activists you see portrayed.
That may very well be, but why don't they denounce that sort of behavior then?
528![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:13:51pm |
re: #527 David Simon
That may very well be, but why don't they denounce that sort of behavior then?
They do, it just doesn't get much press. It's not sensational.
529![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:19:06pm |
re: #526 Lynn B.
Yeah, you may well be right about Kennedy, but he tends to side more with the right than the left.
Agreed.
Kelo was decided by a different court and who understands that decision anyway?
Ah yes, you're right; it was a 2005 decision. My bad. Most puzzling for me was Kennedy's concurrence. Certainly doesn't jibe with his libertarian leanings, does it?
The thing about the SCOTUS that many people (not directed at you) don't always seem to understand is that ideology isn't supposed to be the principle that guides their decisions. It often comes out looking that way but not always.
Good point. There are definitely exceptions. Scalia was more vehement regarding Hamdi than some of the liberal justices. (So much for Thomas and him always voting in lockstep.)
530![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:21:39pm |
re: #511 David Simon
There's no income tax exemption for marriage. There most definitely is an estate tax exemption (unlimited, in fact).
Yes, ok. But that's actually a deduction, not an "exemption," and all it does is kick the can down the road until the death of the surviving spouse.
531![]() |
DocDublU Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:23:00pm |
e-lim-inate the nin-ees and the twits!
cause we're through, be'in cool!
532![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:25:11pm |
re: #529 David Simon
Good point. There are definitely exceptions. Scalia was more vehement regarding Hamdi than some of the liberal justices. (So much for Thomas and him always voting in lockstep.)
I think Thomas has become his own man. You don't hear much of those snide little jokes about him any more. Of course you don't hear any apologies either. He seems to have grown into the job nicely.
533![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:25:38pm |
re: #528 Thanos
They do, it just doesn't get much press. It's not sensational.
That's good to know. I'm not a bigot. I think people have the right to do whatever they want in the privacy of their own homes. But if any gays think that calling me a "homophobe" is going to stop me from objecting to them walking down the street with their cocks hanging out, they can go to hell.
534![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:26:23pm |
To sum up, since gays have been around in every civilization on earth since time immemorial, I'd much rather they be at home happily married & together with someone at midnight rather than in the bushes at your local park hoping Michael George will pass by.
535![]() |
nikis-knight Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:28:41pm |
re: #532 Lynn B.
I think Thomas has become his own man. You don't hear much of those snide little jokes about him any more. Of course you don't hear any apologies either. He seems to have grown into the job nicely.
Clarence Thomas was always his own man. A liberal reporter wrote about the court awhile back, after some records were unsealed. Thomas was persuading other Justices to change their minds from the time he got there, not simply cribing from Scalia as was alleged.
536![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:31:30pm |
re: #530 Lynn B.
Yes, ok. But that's actually a deduction, not an "exemption," and all it does is kick the can down the road until the death of the surviving spouse.
Yes, there's an unlimited marital deduction (the proper term). And yes, it kicks the can down the road, but if the spouse has lots of lineal descendants, an aggressive gifting program can make the deferral quite valuable.
By the way, one of my favorite Bush lines was when Larry King asked him about the unfairness of the estate tax vis a vis the fact that gays can't legally marry: "They should vote for me; I want to get rid of the estate tax."
537![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:36:11pm |
re: #524 Iron Fist
So you don't think the Court forbiding Louisana from executing child rapists is going too far Left? Interesting. What about the terrorist rights case, Boumadine?
That is to the Right to you? Again, interesting. What do you consider Leftwing? Short of nationalizing all means of production and instituting a dictatorship of the Proletariate.
IF, hard as this may be to believe, the SCOTUS isn't here is enforce your personal social agenda. They come up with plenty of rulings that I don't get. Some veer right, some veer left. Boumediene sucked. But if you look at the trend over the past few decades, the Court has moved decidedly back from the far left tack it took under Warren and swung the other way (though not as far).
Obama says the courts should base their rulings on fairness and justice (hard to believe this guy actually taught Constitutional Law ... I pity his students). You sort of seem to agree, only your ideas of fairness and justice depart radically from his. Like I said earlier, that's not how it works.
/why don't we agree to just ignore each other? ok? There's no way I'm getting through to you and vice versa.
538![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:36:48pm |
re: #534 Thanos
To sum up, since gays have been around in every civilization on earth since time immemorial, I'd much rather they be at home happily married & together with someone at midnight rather than in the bushes at your local park hoping Michael George will pass by.
Yes, but granting them the right to have their "marriage" federally recognized has nothing to do with that sort of behavior.
I think you're always going to see an extreme amount of promiscuity among gay men, because, let's face it, they're still guys.
539![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:39:12pm |
re: #535 nikis-knight
Clarence Thomas was always his own man. A liberal reporter wrote about the court awhile back, after some records were unsealed. Thomas was persuading other Justices to change their minds from the time he got there, not simply cribing from Scalia as was alleged.
If you've got a link for that, ... never mind. I'll try to find it myself. Don't think I've read that but I guess it wouldn't surprise me that much.
And now ... time for a nice glass of wine and some grilled pompano. BBL
540![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:43:11pm |
re: #536 David Simon
Yes, there's an unlimited marital deduction (the proper term). And yes, it kicks the can down the road, but if the spouse has lots of lineal descendants, an aggressive gifting program can make the deferral quite valuable.
By the way, one of my favorite Bush lines was when Larry King asked him about the unfairness of the estate tax vis a vis the fact that gays can't legally marry: "They should vote for me; I want to get rid of the estate tax."
LOL.
Sure, the deferral is worth a lot. A hell of a lot. Not sure what you mean about lots of lineal descendants, though. The federal estate tax doesn't treat them any differently than any other beneficiary (though PA inheritance tax does).
Anyway, must be continued later. You're keeping me from my wine. And making me talk work talk on Shabbat. Bad!
541![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:44:54pm |
re: #538 David Simon
Yes, but granting them the right to have their "marriage" federally recognized has nothing to do with that sort of behavior.
I think you're always going to see an extreme amount of promiscuity among gay men, because, let's face it, they're still guys.
No more or less than among straights. Wife swapping clubs are more prevalent than gay venues in parks.
542![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:47:40pm |
Sure, the deferral is worth a lot. A hell of a lot. Not sure what you mean about lots of lineal descendants, though. The federal estate tax doesn't treat them any differently than any other beneficiary (though PA inheritance tax does).
I was referring to the gift tax. The more time a spouse has, the more annual gifts that he or she can make that will deplete his or her estate.
Anyway, must be continued later. You're keeping me from my wine. And making me talk work talk on Shabbat. Bad!
Oy gevalt, why didn't you say something sooner! ;->
543![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:49:46pm |
re: #541 Thanos
No more or less than among straights. Wife swapping clubs are more prevalent than gay venues in parks.
You're suggesting that infidelity among straights is more prevalent than among gay men? Sorry, you're going to have to link to a credible source before I'll believe that one.
544![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:53:09pm |
re: #543 David Simon
You're suggesting that infidelity among straights is more prevalent than among gay men? Sorry, you're going to have to link to a credible source before I'll believe that one.
I'll point to the divorce rates in the south, now do you have a link since I'm not aware that infidelity matters if you can't get married?
545![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 4:54:01pm |
Also I'm going upthread to catch up with the shuttle launch party.
546![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:04:49pm |
re: #544 Thanos
I'll point to the divorce rates in the south, now do you have a link since I'm not aware that infidelity matters if you can't get married?
So, if you're in a committed relationship, you can fuck whoever you want because you're not legally married?
And getting divorced is the same thing as sleeping around?
547![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:17:57pm |
re: #546 David Simon
So, if you're in a committed relationship, you can fuck whoever you want because you're not legally married?
And getting divorced is the same thing as sleeping around?
That's not what I said, it's what you said.
548![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:19:08pm |
re: #546 David Simon
And getting divorced is the same thing as sleeping around?
No, but it infidelity to your vow, n'est ce pas?
551![]() |
Happy4LA Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:25:29pm |
re: #408 VegasRick
Did you see the LA Times today help the No on 8 gang publish the names of those that supported Prop 8? [Link: www.latimes.com...] ... I'm agnostic towards the outcome of this proposition, but it's telling of the Times' political bias that they publish the names and businesses of those who supported Prop 8 and are not being targeted and bullied by the No on 8 crowd. The Times is acting as a disseminator of information for these guys. Obviously they wouldn't do this if they were reporting on an issue they disagreed with.
552![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:27:41pm |
re: #547 Thanos
That's not what I said, it's what you said.
Then I have no idea what you meant by:
now do you have a link since I'm not aware that infidelity matters if you can't get married?
Care to explain?
555![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:45:20pm |
re: #548 Thanos
No, but it infidelity to your vow, n'est ce pas?
I think divorce is a huge problem. The divorce rate nationwide is over 50%, I believe. That's not to say that there aren't people who should get divorced - so long as it's for the right reason.
The mistake a lot of people make is that they go into a relationship thinking "what am I going to get out of this?" While that's fair to a degree, marriage is more about what one gives than what one gets. You have to be prepared to honor the sacred vows. And ask yourself the tough questions: Will I still love this person if he or she is poorer? If he or she gets sick? If he or she gets old? If the answers to those questions is no, don't get married to that person!
You have to keep in mind that just because you're bored, or your "partner" isn't physically attractive anymore, the same "problem" can occur with a new "partner." If you can't fully commit - to the bad as well as the good - no one is going to make you happy.
556![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:45:50pm |
No I'd not care to explain. Rather I would have you explain why the party line is to support "civil union" rather than marriage. There's faint difference, if any. So I'd like someone to explain the logic, which is the start of this discussion if you go upthread. If you don't care to do that, then there's no point.
557![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:50:51pm |
re: #556 Thanos
No I'd not care to explain. Rather I would have you explain why the party line is to support "civil union" rather than marriage. There's faint difference, if any. So I'd like someone to explain the logic, which is the start of this discussion if you go upthread. If you don't care to do that, then there's no point.
You're aware that Obama doesn't support gay marriage either, right?
558![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:51:11pm |
re: #555 David Simon
I'm not asking why marriages detiorate, I'm asking the difference between "Civil union" and "marriage".
559![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:51:35pm |
re: #557 David Simon
You're aware that Obama doesn't support gay marriage either, right?
What does that have to do with anything? I voted McCain...
560![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:54:48pm |
re: #558 Thanos
I'm not asking why marriages detiorate, I'm asking the difference between "Civil union" and "marriage".
Legally? A civil union isn't federally recognized (it might be for state purposes depending on where you live).
561![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 5:59:29pm |
re: #559 Thanos
What does that have to do with anything? I voted McCain...
This:
On Gay marriage most are horrified when I tell them they agree with Fred Phelps, just not the way he says it....
Your words, my friend. You might want to ask your gay friends why they love Obama so much when he "agrees" with Fred Phelps on the subject of gay "marriage."
562![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:03:01pm |
re: #561 David Simon
ahh so I got under your skin with that. So you agree with Fred on gay marriage like Obama does too?
563![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:05:26pm |
re: #560 David Simon
Legally? A civil union isn't federally recognized (it might be for state purposes depending on where you live).
Do you have a link for that "Federally recognized" so I can look into it? Now we are getting to the meat. Why does it matter if a marriage is federally recognized?
564![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:09:58pm |
re: #562 Thanos
ahh so I got under your skin with that. So you agree with Fred on gay marriage like Obama does too?
You're not getting under my skin. We're having a civil discussion.
My stance on gay "marriage" is as follows: I think that marriage should be defined as a union between one man and one woman. If we start to tinker with what is traditionally recognized as marriage, who knows what happens? Do polygamists now have the right to marry as many women as they want? Can bisexuals marry a person of the same sex AND a person of the opposite sex? Can Leona Helmsley marry her dog? (Well, she's dead, but you get the picture.)
For the record, I'm only opposed to redefining marriage. If anyone tries to disenfranchise gays, or enact sodomy laws, or try to deny them any other civil liberties, I will vociferously oppose them.
565![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:12:12pm |
re: #564 David Simon
You're not getting under my skin. We're having a civil discussion.
My stance on gay "marriage" is as follows: I think that marriage should be defined as a union between one man and one woman. If we start to tinker with what is traditionally recognized as marriage, who knows what happens? Do polygamists now have the right to marry as many women as they want? Can bisexuals marry a person of the same sex AND a person of the opposite sex? Can Leona Helmsley marry her dog? (Well, she's dead, but you get the picture.)
For the record, I'm only opposed to redefining marriage. If anyone tries to disenfranchise gays, or enact sodomy laws, or try to deny them any other civil liberties, I will vociferously oppose them.
Traditionally before 382 AD Gay marriage was recognized by many civil authorities. It was outlawed by a couple of Christian tyrants under the aegis of the Divine right of Kings.
566![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:15:49pm |
re: #564 David Simon
My stance on gay "marriage" is as follows: I think that marriage should be defined as a union between one man and one woman. If we start to tinker with what is traditionally recognized as marriage, who knows what happens? Do polygamists now have the right to marry as many women as they want? Can bisexuals marry a person of the same sex AND a person of the opposite sex? Can Leona Helmsley marry her dog? (Well, she's dead, but you get the picture.)
For the record, I'm only opposed to redefining marriage. If anyone tries to disenfranchise gays, or enact sodomy laws, or try to deny them any other civil liberties, I will vociferously oppose them.
Does any of the above harm you, infringe on your rights, or your ability to practice your religion? If not please explain the opposition. If it does, please explain how.
567![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:17:54pm |
re: #563 Thanos
Do you have a link for that "Federally recognized" so I can look into it? Now we are getting to the meat. Why does it matter if a marriage is federally recognized?
Of course not; the 28th amendment failed. But try filing a joint tax return with a same sex "spouse" and see what happens. Try suing an employer who doesn't offer same sex benefits and see what happens.
Or if you're really bold, try filing a joint tax return with your dog. After all, there's no definition of marriage, right?
568![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:18:47pm |
re: #565 Thanos
Traditionally before 382 AD Gay marriage was recognized by many civil authorities. It was outlawed by a couple of Christian tyrants under the aegis of the Divine right of Kings.
Um, so what?
569![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:21:00pm |
re: #537 Lynn B.
Actually, I'd rather the Courts actually stuck to the Constitution. Abortion isn't a Federal issue. The Court should have stayed silent on it. OTOH, gay marriage may be a Federal issue because of the "full faith and credit" clause. What you have now is coming close to allowing the Supreme Court of Mass. to hand down a ruling about Mass., and then through the "full faith and credit" requirement on the Federal Constitution, the Mass. ruling changing the laws of the other 49 States.
It is certainly a possible outcome. I could argue the issue both ways, but it is certainly not cut and dried either way. This possibility is why the Right want a Constutional Amendment to settle the issue. Another option would be for the Courts to decide that the question wasn't open to Judicial review, but it is too late for that. One of the consequences of that is Prop. 8. That the issue would be put before the voters in the form of a Constitutional Amendment was almost guarenteed when the California State Supreme Court overturned the State law that was passed by something like 75% of the voters.
The Courts can drive social change, but only so much. They were able to on the abortion issue only because the legal consensus of the country is sufficiently divided that a Constitutional Amendment won't pass, first, in the Senate, but in the requsite number of States to enact it.
That dosen't make Roe v. Wade good law. That is a different question. Until the Supreme Court reverses the decision it remains the law of the land.
BTW, I am not the person that insists the Supreme Court legislate morality. That is the pro-abortion side of the debate. I want the issue removed from Federal consideration because there is no Constitutional foundation for the decision. States all have different laws regarding homicide including what is considered justifiable homicide. The laws of the State of New York, for example, can send you to prison for a long sentance for acts that wouldn't even be prosecuted in Tenneese.
I see no constutional foundations for a Federal decision on abortion that would interfer with that. Under that scheme, if New York wants to allow partial-birth abortion, there is nothing the Federal government can do to outlaw it. It is only because of Roe that the Federal government has the authority to ban such procedures.
Finally, whether or not one of us convinces the other is not really relevant. There are literally thousands of people who are reading our debate. They are my target audience, not you. To a large degree you are relevant only insofar as your responses force me to evaluate them to respond to you.
570![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:21:36pm |
re: #568 David Simon
Um, so what?
You said you favored "traditional marriage", not I.
Take the canard of bestiality and polygamy out of the picture -- how does the marriage of two consenting adults of any sort harm you in any manner whatsoever?
571![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:21:50pm |
re: #566 Thanos
Does any of the above harm you, infringe on your rights, or your ability to practice your religion? If not please explain the opposition. If it does, please explain how.
Harm me? Directly, no. I think the much greater concern is the harm that would be done to society as a whole.
572![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:22:59pm |
re: #571 David Simon
Harm me? Directly, no. I think the much greater concern is the harm that would be done to society as a whole.
How?
573![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:26:06pm |
re: #565 Thanos
Have you got a link for that? I've used the challenge that no State in recorded history has ever recognized gay marriage as, well, marriage up until very recently as evidence for how groundbreaking the concept is. If I am wrong on that point, I'd appreciate clarification.
Either way doesn't change the fact that gay marriage is so far out of the mainstream of modern American political thought that it is unwise to try to force the issue through the Courts, but it is a detail I'd like to clarify.
574![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:26:56pm |
re: #570 Thanos
You said you favored "traditional marriage", not I.
Take the canard of bestiality and polygamy out of the picture -- how does the marriage of two consenting adults of any sort harm you in any manner whatsoever?
You're going to argue that gay "marriage" is traditional? That is so twisted it defies a response.
575![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:32:50pm |
re: #572 Thanos
How?
I've already stated it. It opens the door to all sorts of crazy unions. And it could wreak havoc with the economy. For example, an employer who provides family coverage for health insurance would be forced to provide the same coverage for same sex partners (and if it becomes a slippery slope, Abdullah's eight wives.)
Let me ask this question: Are you for not defining marriage at all, or you're okay with a two-person marriage? If the latter, how are you not discriminating against polygamists, bisexuals or any other "whatever floats your boat" combo?
576![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:33:10pm |
re: #574 David Simon
You're going to argue that gay "marriage" is traditional? That is so twisted it defies a response.
It was considered traditional at one time, don't need the link as here's the snippet of Theodosian code that outlawed Gay marriage:
Theodosian Code 9.8.3: "When a man marries and is about to offer himself to men in womanly fashion {quum vir nubit in feminam viris porrecturam), what does he wish, when sex has lost all its significance; when the crime is one which it is not profitable to know; when Venus is changed to another form; when love is sought and not found? We order the statutes to arise, the laws to be armed with an avenging sword, that those infamous persons who are now, or who hereafter may be, guilty may be subjected to exquisite punishment.
577![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:37:27pm |
re: #575 David Simon
Wreak havoc is a bit overwrought if you ask me. Gays represent at most 1-2 percent of the population, and you've already said you support civil unions which in many cases would achieve same effect, so again why quibble over a word? "Open the door to all sorts of crazy". What's crazy about 1 to 2 percent of the population who has throughout history been attracted to same sex? It doesn't make sense biologically, but why are gays crazy?
578![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:42:53pm |
re: #575 David Simon
Let me ask this question: Are you for not defining marriage at all, or you're okay with a two-person marriage? If the latter, how are you not discriminating against polygamists, bisexuals or any other "whatever floats your boat" combo?
I've already said I'm ok with a definition of "two consenting adult humans". Why do keep trying to drag in polygamy, beastility, and other slippery slope arguments? This is argument through fear, not reason. We are talking about gay marriage between two people, not beast sex in other words.
579![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:46:12pm |
re: #576 Thanos
It was considered traditional at one time
So was bloodletting, among other things.
You're talking ancient history, man.
580![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:48:41pm |
re: #577 Thanos
Wreak havoc is a bit overwrought if you ask me. Gays represent at most 1-2 percent of the population, and you've already said you support civil unions which in many cases would achieve same effect, so again why quibble over a word? "Open the door to all sorts of crazy". What's crazy about 1 to 2 percent of the population who has throughout history been attracted to same sex? It doesn't make sense biologically, but why are gays crazy?
I never said gays are crazy. And you never answered my question: Are you willing to open the door to any kind of union whatsoever?
581![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:48:58pm |
re: #579 David Simon
You still haven't satisfactorily answered how it harms society or you, try again.
582![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:50:03pm |
re: #580 David Simon
I never said gays are crazy. And you never answered my question: Are you willing to open the door to any kind of union whatsoever?
No, obviously some are harmful to you, yours, and society. However you've not answered satisfactorily answered how gay marriage harms you or society at large.
583![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:51:28pm |
re: #578 Thanos
I've already said I'm ok with a definition of "two consenting adult humans". Why do keep trying to drag in polygamy, beastility, and other slippery slope arguments? This is argument through fear, not reason. We are talking about gay marriage between two people, not beast sex in other words.
Ah, so you would discriminate against people who don't fit the "two human being" definition of marriage. Thanks for clarifying.
And when did bestiality enter into the discussion? If I love my dog, it doesn't mean I want to have sex with it.
584![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:52:14pm |
re: #581 Thanos
You still haven't satisfactorily answered how it harms society or you, try again.
Not to your satisfaction, but I suspect I never will.
585![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:53:11pm |
re: #583 David Simon
You brought up leona helms and dogs, not I. Was there are purpose to that ?
586![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:53:40pm |
re: #584 David Simon
Not to your satisfaction, but I suspect I never will.
In other words you can't show the harm.
587![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 6:58:03pm |
re: #582 Thanos
No, obviously some are harmful to you, yours, and society. However you've not answered satisfactorily answered how gay marriage harms you or society at large.
No, I have answered it. Just not to your satisfaction. Which is odd because you just justified your "discrimination" of "slippery slope" marriages with a dismissive "No, obviously some are harmful to you, yours, and society," without getting into any specifics.
Why are the harmful aspects of other alternative lifestyles axiomatic?
588![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:01:57pm |
re: #585 Thanos
You brought up leona helms and dogs, not I. Was there are purpose to that ?
Yes. You assume that all love is based on sex. Helmsley left the lion's share of her estate to her dog. It's a moot point now because you've already acknowledged your "bigotry." (And quite honestly, I wouldn't want to legalize human /dog marriages even though I don't see what harm it would cause ME.)
589![]() |
David Simon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:05:09pm |
re: #586 Thanos
In other words you can't show the harm.
lol. You, who upthread, "didn't care to discuss" is now claiming that I can't "show the harm" because you don't agree with the explanation I've provided you.
Whatever, I think you're a bright guy, and I'm glad you post here. Even if I think you're completely out to lunch on this issue.
I'm going to hit the sack. Goodnight Thanos.
590![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:05:19pm |
re: #588 David Simon
well this tit for tat could go all night, but you've not given convincing argument except the tyranny of majority opinion against a specific minority for no cause.
591![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:06:59pm |
re: #589 David Simon
I countered your argument on the harm to society, you never answered that. I assumed you conceded. Please re-read.
You assume you know what I assume, when did you develop your telepathic talent, was it at early age?
592![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:10:20pm |
No re: #587 David Simon
No, I have answered it. Just not to your satisfaction. Which is odd because you just justified your "discrimination" of "slippery slope" marriages with a dismissive "No, obviously some are harmful to you, yours, and society," without getting into any specifics.
Why are the harmful aspects of other alternative lifestyles axiomatic?
No you are arguing "slippery slope" which is almost always a false argument. It's the same sort of argument anti-gun proponents use -- "if we allow semi-auto, next they'll want full auto and bazookas!"
We are talking about gay marriage between two adult humans, it's you who keeps bringing in other types of unions exactly because you have no salient or convincing argument against gay marriage.
593![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:10:41pm |
I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman but that's just my belief, not based upon anything the bible says, just because it seems logical to me. I won't make a strenuous argument over it, though. That would be pointless since it looks like the courts are eventually just going to ram it through, anyway. Why bother defending traditional marriage when all norms are going into the wood-chipper regardless?
594![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:15:28pm |
re: #593 Salem
I also believe marriage should be between a man and woman, but I am not one to force my beliefs on others through the tyranny of the masses and force majeur. Gay people aren't going to go away, I'll go back to what I said above. I prefer them to be married if that's their desire.
595![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:16:01pm |
Okay, I think the benefits and protection of marraige are really for women and the children that are produced from that institution. I think men ought to be able to get by without it. Men aren't women. There. I just don't see how humanity and society benefit in any way from gay marraige. I just see it as stealing from women and children (even if most women have been trained to advocate against their best interests).
596![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:17:13pm |
re: #542 David Simon
I was referring to the gift tax. The more time a spouse has, the more annual gifts that he or she can make that will deplete his or her estate.
Yes, I know. But those gifts aren't limited to lineal descendants. You can make a gift subject to the annual gift tax exclusion (scheduled to rise to $13,000 as of 1/1/09) to anyone you want. Your cousin, your neighbor, your significant other, your best friend ... hence my question about your reference to lineal descendants.
/haven't read past this comment but skimmed down so I know you and Thanos are engaged in an interesting "conversation" ...
597![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:17:45pm |
Exercising tyrranny against what is just plain silly shouldn't be necessary. But some people are just silly and want to tear down anything that challenges that silliness.
598![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:21:08pm |
re: #595 Salem
Okay, I think the benefits and protection of marraige are really for women and the children that are produced from that institution. I think men ought to be able to get by without it. Men aren't women. There. I just don't see how humanity and society benefit in any way from gay marraige. I just see it as stealing from women and children (even if most women have been trained to advocate against their best interests).
Ok that said, gays exist, gays have children, would you disenfranchise their children from the protection of a family odd though it may be?
599![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:23:12pm |
Maybe I've got a traditionalist side that doesn't see men as the weaker sex regardless of their disposition. Again, since the courts are just going to be rubber-stamping it against the will of the majority, perhaps I'd just as well keep that opinion to myself.
600![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:28:52pm |
re: #599 Salem
Maybe I've got a traditionalist side that doesn't see men as the weaker sex regardless of their disposition. Again, since the courts are just going to be rubber-stamping it against the will of the majority, perhaps I'd just as well keep that opinion to myself.
My point is that Gay marriage is small if any harm to society, gayness is going to exist anyways, for conservatives to oppose it as a matter of course rather than personal belief is a long term failing strategy. It's a posture that causes more harm to our goals than good.
601![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:39:36pm |
re: #598 Thanos
Ok that said, gays exist, gays have children, would you disenfranchise their children from the protection of a family odd though it may be?
It won't be up to me. I just don't see that as an ideal. If that's better than growing up in an orphanage, fine. But when children come out of test tubes to validate a gay marriage, I have to wonder.
602![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:47:12pm |
re: #601 Salem
It won't be up to me. I just don't see that as an ideal. If that's better than growing up in an orphanage, fine. But when children come out of test tubes to validate a gay marriage, I have to wonder.
I agree with you mostly Salem, but we need to focus on stuff we can realistically do, and causing least harm. The stuff that's going to make a better future for the majority is so much more important than focusing on keeping a small minority of the population living within our personal belief systems. E.G. Navajoe and other indian tribes used to sanction gay marriages, it's odd to us but on the other hand who are we to tell them how to live?
603![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:48:32pm |
This argument will never make sense to me, as long as I follow it, and I've been following it a long time. If two people love each other and want to make a commitment to each other, I see no earthly reason why that commitment shouldn't be legally sanctioned with whatever word society normally attaches to such unions. The red herrings constantly thrown up comparing gay marriage to every sort of perversion under the sun just don't fly. Two consenting adults, making a commitment. That's it.
The assumption that this is about sex or coerced public "approval" of what some people consider deviant behavior is just incredibly misinformed. I know committed lesbian couples who simply feel they can share their feelings so much better with other women than with men. I know ill and aging women who feel they will be cared for better and with more sensitivity and empathy by other women in their advanced years than by most men they know. I have a dear close friend in San Francisco who married his beloved partner of 16 years a few days before the election because he realized it might be his last chance and wanted to ratify his commitment in terms of humanity's most cherished covenant.
Opposition to gay marriage is always defined in the most crass and petty terms imaginable. Iron Fist, with whom I obviously share few views, provided a simple portrait of a quietly committed lesbian couple earlier on this thread. I was just as nauseated by Zombie's Folsom Street exposé as anyone else here, believe me. I don't know anyone like that. I don't want to know anyone like that. I doubt that any of the "men" participating in that event give a damn about any sort of commitment, let alone marriage.
There is simply too much deliberate confusion on this issue and I just wish people could step back and ask themselves how, really, it could possibly "threaten" anything.
604![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:52:35pm |
re: #600 Thanos
My point is that Gay marriage is small if any harm to society, gayness is going to exist anyways, for conservatives to oppose it as a matter of course rather than personal belief is a long term failing strategy. It's a posture that causes more harm to our goals than good.
Conservatives don't carry much water in California last time I checked. Gays keep comparing their struggle to the civil rights struggle. I think that trivializes the civil rights struggle to the extreme. I think we're dealing with people who will never be satisfied until they are considered not simply equal but ideal. I'm never going to see it that way. In this society of luxury taken for granted, frivolities like gay marriage may seem important. But where things are down to the basics, survival still depends on men and women.
Fine, lets let everyone reap the benefits of marriage until there are no benefits to being married. That's obviously the political objective here.
605![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 7:58:15pm |
Sorry. Again, it's not going to affect me either way. I guess I'm just blathering on.
607![]() |
Lynn B. Fri, Nov 14, 2008 8:02:54pm |
re: #604 Salem
Conservatives don't carry much water in California last time I checked. Gays keep comparing their struggle to the civil rights struggle. I think that trivializes the civil rights struggle to the extreme. I think we're dealing with people who will never be satisfied until they are considered not simply equal but ideal. I'm never going to see it that way. In this society of luxury taken for granted, frivolities like gay marriage may seem important. But where things are down to the basics, survival still depends on men and women.
Fine, lets let everyone reap the benefits of marriage until there are no benefits to being married. That's obviously the political objective here.
Of course they keep comparing it to the civil rights struggle. It IS a civil rights struggle. It just wasn't that long ago that many states prohibited marriages between blacks and whites. And not that long before that, Nazi Germany prohibited marriages between Aryans and Jews. It's hardly a frivolous issue. Marriage has long been recognized as a tool to prevent enfranchisement of despised minorities.
Again, allowing two committed consensual adults to marry, regardless of their race, religion or gender, in no way dilutes the "benefits" of being married. Like so many other "social issues," it comes down to religious proscriptions and the attempt to enforce one's faith-based morals on other people. It doesn't work and it isn't consistent with our Constitution.
Need I remind anyone here that codifying religious definitions of marriage into law could have very different consequences, depending upon the religion being codified?
608![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 8:03:05pm |
re: #606 Thanos
There are benefits to being married?!
/don't tell my wife :)
It's certainly something I'd never subject myself to. :)
609![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 8:04:27pm |
re: #428 Spare O'Lake
What would happen if half the states had an outright ban, and the other half had abortion on demand?
Would the result not be chaotic? And even worse, would this not mean that abortion would be more accessible to the wealthy who could afford to pay the additonal costs associated with going "abortion-shopping"?
It just seems too weird, just like it would if murder was legal in some states and not in others.
Until recently, anal sex was legal in some states and banned in others. Today, prostitution is legal in some states and banned in others. In some counties, alcohol is banned while the next county it is legal. One could call this chaos, but others call it autonomy. And if you don't like the laws in your county or state, you can move. Or you can cross the county or state line and be as perverted as they allow and come back.
611![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 8:09:56pm |
re: #607 Lynn B.
I won't bother arguing that sexual preference is on the same level as race. I'm never going to agree. And it doesn't matter what I think, ultimately.
613![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 8:56:00pm |
To each his own
Sorry, couldn't find The Inkspots version
614![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 9:00:56pm |
Okay, that was harsh. Delete as necessary. I'm not black or gay or religious, so it isn't my fight. If I was a black guy in California listening to the governor urge the disenfranchisement of my my vote as intolerant and unacceptable, I might have room to be so crass. If I had children in school being taught that homosexuality is normal and healthy I might be excused. I'm none of those things, so I ought to be able to be content to let the affected parties duke it out without adding to the din.
615![]() |
joan Sat, Nov 15, 2008 7:25:08am |
re: #476 formercorpsman
What has really distrubed me, is the physical backlash we are seeing by certain groups claiming victim status.
As nothing surprises me anymore, if gay marriage becomes legal, it would not phase me one bit, to see these same thugs assaulting people during church services, then demand the church to perform the ceremony...
"The assumption that this is about sex or coerced public "approval" of what some people consider deviant behavior is just incredibly misinformed." (from a post upthread).
This is entirely about coerced public approval and re-education of private thought and belief.
In Canada, religious prohibitions against homosexual behavior can no longer be preached from the pulpit, unless one is willing to face litigation and possible sanctions under hate speech laws. In public schools all across our country from k - 12 "gay's okay" is taught in the classroom and in High Schools it is legitimized and enforced by the activist GSA (gay straight alliance).
If your kid hasn't been confronted by this issue yet, it is just a matter of time until the social pressure, the values clarification and "debate" sessions of Middle School begin. It will only take one gay-bashing bully to close the case for most young people, as the act of bullying becomes beside the point and the anti-gay hate speech becomes the crime. Right now, Christian kids who try to swim against the tide of indoctrination on this and many other issues in the war against traditional values are bullied and singled out. Bullying is okay, you just have to choose the right target.
The goal is to silence the pulpits and the public. Gay marriage is a tactic to identify dissenters, punish and silence the very concept of tradition, through hate speech codes. Winning the right to marriage--not just civil rights or civil marriage ceremonies, full sacramental marriage, is one aspect of an overall strategy to destroy traditional values completely and reshape this America to a collectivist and utilitarian ethic. "Change!"
When this particular battle is won through the courts, as Roe vs Wade overturned the majority consensus and legal tradition, when the vote of the electorate is nullified and a re-defined concept of what marriage is prevails--then polygamy will be decriminalized too. Any semblance of stability or tradition in the basic, family-building unit of civilization will vanish. That is the goal. The State will soon fully own your child's heart and mind and allegiance. So, many say, "good riddance" to Judeo-Christian values, hail the brave new world. The real message of these actions is "surrender your children. They will be fostered by the values of the collectivist and utilitarian leftist elite, as it is forbidden for them to be fostered any longer by tradition."
I understand that the Republican Party is a political party, not a religious party. So, Republican Party go ahead and let go of the culture war--it is lost anyway. Maybe Republicans can save some of our basic rights if they can ever win an election again.
Food for thought: if every abortion victim received burial in an infant coffin, the cemetery required to inter the bodies would stretch one hundred miles long, by one hundred miles wide. Violent homosexual in a mobs have also existed in human history. They are allowed to brutalize an old lady they don't like with impunity, with no charges filed they can crash down the doors of churches. Consult your intuition and your common sense about what this actually says about our country's future.
To my fellow social conservatives: we are not wrong about these issues. God is not mocked. Take care of your family, keep a short account with your Creator.
616![]() |
Joan Sat, Nov 15, 2008 7:51:55am |
re: #603 Lynn B.
"There is simply too much deliberate confusion on this issue and I just wish people could step back and ask themselves how, really, it could possibly "threaten" anything."
It opens the door to prosecution of free speech as "hate speech." It opens the door to prosecute and criminalize religious speech, see the record in Canada and look into the law suit being filed and likely won forcing a conservative minister to perform a gay marriage ceremony.
I'm not forcing my religion on gay couples, and have no desire to deny them the right to set their affairs in order as they see fit: to be employed, to be committed and have insurance benefits and "next of kin" rights for their partners. Civic, civil rights. There are many liberal/left congregations and denominations that will perform marriage ceremonies, commitment ceremonies. The barrier they wish to break is in the realm of the sacramental, the realm of private and personal religious belief, practice and teaching.
Have you asked yourself the question, honestly, as you asked us to do: what is the threat posed by gay marriage? My answer: as a useful tool to To silence, re-educate, destroy dissent, complete the transformation of the American consensus to a more malleable and collectivist ethic. It isn't even about gay marriage per se, it is about deconstruction.
Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.
© 2009 Little Green Footballs
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy
