Friday Afternoon Open
Open | Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07:55 pm PST
You only punch yourself out when you start swinging blind.
— Devo
Show top rated links | LinkViewer
Open | Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07:55 pm PST
You only punch yourself out when you start swinging blind.
— Devo
617 comments
3![]() |
davinvalkri Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:08:56pm |
Too true, too true.
Wait...Devo is some kind of band, right?
5![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:09:48pm |
Fox says the British PM has asked for a global tax cut.
6![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:10:13pm |
Is anyone else happy that Obama is talking to The Hill-debeast about a position inside his administration? Personally, I think it'll be the end of her if she accepts.
7![]() |
MrSilverDragon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:10:23pm |
I always liked, "We're through being cool!"
Somehow seems appropriate for me!
8![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:10:32pm |
Hehe. Wow, I posted this to the wrong thread:
I seem to recall a lot of people on this forum refused to support Rudy in part because they suspected him of wanting to magically confiscate our guns. Now we have a Dem monopoly with a gun owner's worst nightmare in the White House.
Yep, we're all really gonna want to put our support behind the socons now, huh? Who knows what we can achieve in 2010 with that kind of brain-power?
9![]() |
sadhu Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:11:17pm |
STS 126 launch is at 6:55pm EST
[Link: ping.fm...]
10![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:12:04pm |
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
“It has started devouring our rich culture. Unless we can collectively stop it, the survival of our arts, sculptures, writings and dramas will be at stake.”
Large groups of Bangladeshi artists – including film-makers, singers and writers – began daily protests last month after authorities removed two newly commissioned sculptures of local folk singers erected outside Dhaka's airport.
A group of Muslim hardliners calling themselves the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee complained that the sculptures were idols, which are strictly forbidden in Islam, and threatened to attack the artwork with power tools.
Buoyed by their removal, hardline Islamists are now demanding that the government erect a minaret honouring Muslim pilgrims at the same airport site.
One of the group's leaders Mufti Fazlul Haq Amini, a former MP, says that he will “demolish all statues” if his party wins the December 18 parliamentary elections.
Heh.
13![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:13:16pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
Wow, even the hippies aren't safe from Muslim extremists? No way, man!
14![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:13:49pm |
re: #8 Salem
Yup, the silly GOP purity tests on abortion and gun control are killing us.
17![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:14:48pm |
boy am i in the mood to drink opening up another old resputin
18![]() |
Pvt Bin Jammin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:14:57pm |
re: #9 sadhu
STS 126 launch is at 6:55pm EST
[Link: ping.fm...]
Very cool kick-off for Air Force Week.
19![]() |
Max Darkside Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:14:57pm |
20![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:06pm |
Does anyone ever get the impression that it's over, the looters have won.
[Link: www.dallasnews.com...]
Dallas school district engaging in 'official' identify theft of SSN numbers to employ illegals ... to teach our children.
Why do we put up with this sh1t? And look at the bailout mess... its the same basic problem.
Is it beer o'clock yet?
21![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:36pm |
Well the market dropped like a rock at thee end and finished up down 337 tp close at 8,498
Given that the DOW was at about 9,600 the night of the election, that means the market has lost about 11 points or 11.5% since The Messiah got elected.
I know there are many factors involved, but I think Obama's election is part of it. The market is always a bet on the future, which now includes Obama and his big government ideas.
Say what you will about giving the President-elect the benefit of the doubt, so far the market does not like it.
22![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:46pm |
re: #16 yochanan
wife being a b'''h anyone what a wife?
No, thanks. Have one . . . and she's REALLY pregnant.
23![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:15:57pm |
wonder if we can go to alaska and start over ala ayn rand
24![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:16:04pm |
re: #8 Salem
I think the first thing conservatives need to do right now is to avoid labels like "RINO" and "socon." The definition of these words is slippery, and all we really know is that they are meant to be pejoratives.
25![]() |
Catttt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:16:18pm |
Freedom of choice is what you've got.
Freedom from choice is what you want.
27![]() |
unclassifiable Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:16:34pm |
DEVO
Now is their time because it's all going backwards...
Emotion over reason -- check
Fanaticism over deliberation -- check
Style over substance -- check
"We are all sitting down because after 10 years of dealing with promoters in this business it's the only way we can play without pain."
31![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:21pm |
re: #26 saberry0530
How Much for the women?
"The wife . . . your little girl . . . I want to buy them."
32![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:24pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners“It has started devouring our rich culture. Unless we can collectively stop it, the survival of our arts, sculptures, writings and dramas will be at stake.”
Large groups of Bangladeshi artists – including film-makers, singers and writers – began daily protests last month after authorities removed two newly commissioned sculptures of local folk singers erected outside Dhaka's airport.
A group of Muslim hardliners calling themselves the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee complained that the sculptures were idols, which are strictly forbidden in Islam, and threatened to attack the artwork with power tools.
Buoyed by their removal, hardline Islamists are now demanding that the government erect a minaret honouring Muslim pilgrims at the same airport site.
One of the group's leaders Mufti Fazlul Haq Amini, a former MP, says that he will “demolish all statues” if his party wins the December 18 parliamentary elections.
Oh, fer cryin' out loud!
Give in, and they feel empowered to demand more and more.
I hope some sanity comes back so that governments stop this giving in to the demands of those who are so very easily "offended" by anything.
33![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:26pm |
re: #16 yochanan
wife being a b'''h anyone what a wife?
Is the warranty still good? Maybe you can take her back for a refund.
36![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:56pm |
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
37![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:17:57pm |
re: #23 yochanan
You can get Penguin copies of Atlas Shrugged for about $8. I have given a few out. 'Course I really don't expect them to get read, but who knows.
40![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:00pm |
41![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:06pm |
42![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:46pm |
#21 3 Wood
If you're still around maybe you could shoot me an email. Galloping Granny thought that maybe it would be good for us to chat.
43![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:18:56pm |
44![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:19:02pm |
45![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:19:02pm |
re: #33 victor_yugo
jewish women you know they are the boss HELP
46![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:19:13pm |
re: #35 taxfreekiller
tfk knows what I'm talking about, I feel better.
47![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:20:04pm |
48![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:20:39pm |
re: #20 Harry Tuttle
Does anyone ever get the impression that it's over, the looters have won.
[Link: www.dallasnews.com...]
Dallas school district engaging in 'official' identify theft of SSN numbers to employ illegals ... to teach our children.
Why do we put up with this sh1t? And look at the bailout mess... its the same basic problem.
Is it beer o'clock yet?
I just talked to my brother-in-law about this, he lives in Dallas. Here's what he said about this Dallas Independent School District:
The DISD is derided by all that know as being a terribly run school district, virtually no one who can afford otherwise who lives in the DISD sends their children to public school there. More importantly, the DISD's administrators are constantly committing malfeasance and constantly being replaced. These people should go to prison for this, in my view.
49![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:20:54pm |
re: #47 Ben Hur
SHE ISN'T ISRAELI american born but help me anyway
50![]() |
BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:21:06pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
Isn't there a statue of limitations for those offenses?
/
51![]() |
subsailor68 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:21:17pm |
re: #16 yochanan
wife being a b'''h anyone what a wife?
Old joke:
Older man finally decides he's gonna buy that Corvette he's always wanted. Gets out onto the interstate and kicks it. He's doing well over 100 mph when he sees the Florida State Trooper's flashers in his mirror.
Pulls over, and the officer comes up to the car.
Officer says, "Look, it's Friday and my shift is almost over. Make ya a deal. You give me an excuse I haven't heard and I'll let it go.'
Older man: "Well officer, about ten years ago my wife ran off with a Florida State Trooper. I was just afraid he was tryin' to bring her back."
Officer: "Have a nice weekend sir."
52![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:21:18pm |
re: #14 Killgore Trout
Yup, the silly GOP purity tests on abortion and gun control are killing us.
Ironic how we seem to alternate between socon candidates and feeble duplicitous Senate fossils like Dole and McCain. I suppose Jindal will be a lock for the 2012 candidate if that cycle isn't broken.
53![]() |
Pullus Iulius Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:14pm |
re: #5 debutaunt
Fox says the British PM has asked for a global tax cut.
I can see all the other heads of state saying "Hmmm...Sounds like an idea. You go first, Mister Prime Minister."
54![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:16pm |
re: #21 3 wood
Given that the DOW was at about 9,600 the night of the election, that means the market has lost about 11 points or 11.5% since The Messiah got elected.
make that "has lost about 1100 points"
It's hard to work and blog at the same time.
55![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:29pm |
re: #36 turn
. . .
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
I have very strong feelings on all those issues, but I agree with you.
56![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:52pm |
re: #51 subsailor68
roflmao wifie did not thning that was funny
57![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:22:56pm |
re: #8 Salem
Man, I get so tired of shit about Rudy. The motherfucker didn't run for President. He expected to be coronated, and when that didn't happen, he went home.
58![]() |
jorline Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:23:10pm |
Kanye West says he's 'voice of this generation'
LONDON (AP) - Kanye West is to music what Michael Jordan was to basketball—at least that West thinks, in his humble estimation. "I realize that my place and position in history is that I will go down as the voice of this generation, of this decade, I will be the loudest voice," he said in an interview on Wednesday.
"It's me settling into that position of just really accepting that it's one thing to say you want to do it and it's another thing to really end up being like Michael Jordan."The Grammy-winning rapper-producer said Justin Timberlake had a chance to be music's MVP, but hasn't put out enough material. (Timberlake's last album was in 2006, while West released a CD last year and is releasing his latest—"808s and Heartbreak"—on Nov. 24.)
"There were people who had the potential to do it but they went on vacation, so when Justin went on vacation I made albums," he said. "And it just came out to be that."
West, 31, said life has been difficult since his mother's death. Donda West died last November after having plastic surgery.
"I'm just going through balancing that. And I always used to have that support system, you know. My mom would be there; no matter what, she was there before everything," he said. "We were together for like 30 years. And you know now when I'm on that stage and I look out and I say, 'What am I going to do with the rest of my life?' Like when does a real life start?' Because I have sacrificed real life to be a celebrity and to give this art to people, which is great. It is great that I was able to do that, I'm not trying to shun that in any way, but it's definitely a Catch-22 and it's bittersweet."
Anybody have a pin to pop this SOB's head?
59![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:23:11pm |
re: #36 turn
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
It was founded on both.
60![]() |
subsailor68 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:23:54pm |
61![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:03pm |
re: #58 jorline
Kanye West says he's 'voice of this generation'
Anybody have a pin to pop this SOB's head?
Kanye West doesn't care about white people.
62![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:24pm |
re: #26 saberry0530
How Much for the women?
Have you read Thomas Hardy's "The Mayor of Castorbridge"? So sad.
63![]() |
MrSilverDragon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:32pm |
64![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:46pm |
65![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:24:47pm |
beer me on my fourth old resputin at 9 % i guess i have to remember the iron fist rule
thank g-d shabos starts in less than a hour
67![]() |
joncelli Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:25:22pm |
re: #23 yochanan
Current conditions in Anchorage, AK. (Be careful what you wish for.)
68![]() |
Kenneth Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:25:31pm |
Taliban ♥ Obama!
“The overwhelming victory of Barrack Obama, the candidate of the Democrats in the US Presidential Election and his assumption of US presidency reveals the collective willingness of American people not to continue the current despicable and anti-human wars in Afghanistan and Iraq --- wars that have been launched by W. Bush. They do not want their children to be fodder of war flames any more. This war, which is the outcome of Bush’s belligerence and warmongering mindset, has resulted in failure both in Afghanistan and Iraq. It had neither a logical standing nor a legal footing to begin with. Despite the huge loss sustained in terms of military hardware and in terms of lives of thousands of US and its ally’s soldiers, it is now facing a historical defeat and disgrace. The USA is now grappling with an enormous and almost irreversible financial system crisis. Washington has lost its previous caliber in the world and its good name has been spoiled. Still more, the loathing and repugnance on the part of the public of the world is accumulating against it.As in contrast to Bush, Obama had promised that he would not follow Bush’s policy. He had pledged to recover the dwindling American economy and find a niche in the comity of nations. It is, therefore, imperative for Obama to put an end to all the policies being followed by his Opposition Party, the Republicans and pull out US troops from Afghanistan and Iraq forthwith. If Obama and the Democrats would like to follow into the steps of Bush and see their magnanimity in oppressing and subjugating nations and nurture the ambitions of prolonging the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, then it is clear that the fate of the Democrats will be even more shameful and despicable than the Republicans. They will not bring the ship of the downfall of USA safely to the coast of rescue and will not land it securely. It was because of this sky-high expenditure, which is now pushing America to the verge of penury and their economic institutions are melting down. Europe and the rest of the world are pondering to bring about changes in their financial relations with USA.
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan reminds the newly-elected leadership of USA that the presence of thousands of NATO and US forces in Afghanistan and the policy of intransigence and bellicose neither had any achievement nor brought about security and peace to the people of Afghanistan.”
69![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:03pm |
re: #52 Salem
Ironic how we seem to alternate between socon candidates and feeble duplicitous Senate fossils like Dole and McCain. I suppose Jindal will be a lock for the 2012 candidate if that cycle isn't broken.
Oh, goodness.
My take on Jindal: He makes a better appearance at being a good public executive, than he does doing the actual job of being a public executive.
Don't get me wrong - we here in La. are much better off with Jindal than with Blanco, he has done much right.
But boy howdy - there have been some major screw-ups too, that should not have happened.
70![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:13pm |
re: #49 yochanan
SHE ISN'T ISRAELI american born but help me anyway
Habibi, you got it easy.
Israeli chicks never let up.
71![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:20pm |
72![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:26:50pm |
74![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:23pm |
re: #65 yochanan
beer me on my fourth old resputin at 9 % i guess i have to remember the iron fist rule
thank g-d shabos starts in less than a hour
?
75![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:32pm |
re: #55 reine.de.tout
I have very strong feelings on all those issues, but I agree with you.
I see Salem and Kilgore are talking about the same thing. How can this be turned around in time to save the GOP's ass in two years?
76![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:34pm |
re: #58 jorline
He's "sacrificed real life" to be a "celebrity"?
LOLOLOLOL!
How stupid is that?
Being a celebrity IS real life, if that is what you have chosen AND if you have the talent for it.
All he has to do is take himself out of play, if he wants a "real life".
78![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:37pm |
re: #14 Killgore Trout
Yeah, if we were just more like the Democrats we'd win? You are never going to get to the Left of the Democrats, so if that's your plan for winning, you are always going to lose.
Always.
79![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:27:49pm |
re: #57 Iron Fist
Man, I get so tired of shit about Rudy. The motherfucker didn't run for President. He expected to be coronated, and when that didn't happen, he went home.
Thank you.
81![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:28:21pm |
re: #66 taxfreekiller
take a look in the mirror
looking for an easy out
blame the Republicansblame one group of Republicans
blame the leaders of the Republicans
blame the religious right of the Republicanswho blames who, and why and how
does that get votes, does that control
the prescient caucus after a primaryif you are there, if you get your group there
if you have a majority there, you will get a say
if you post here on lgf's and other blogs you
will be a well known poster, and you will have
those who agree with you here,the caucus room, the county convention, the state and national conventions, that is where the facts and votes count
like that
Dude you are like a character in an Ayn Rand book.
And as usual you are right.
82![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:28:34pm |
re: #77 yochanan
frumie jewish girlies don[t' either HELP
Well, it's a mitzvah to "have relations" on Friday night, so I suggest Black Label and Viagra.
83![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:28:54pm |
re: #78 Iron Fist
HOW MANY RUSPUTINS DO I HAVE TO HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE IRON FIST RULE?
HELP ME BROTHER
84![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:01pm |
re: #8 Salem
Hehe. Wow, I posted this to the wrong thread:
I seem to recall a lot of people on this forum refused to support Rudy in part because they suspected him of wanting to magically confiscate our guns. Now we have a Dem monopoly with a gun owner's worst nightmare in the White House.
Yep, we're all really gonna want to put our support behind the socons now, huh? Who knows what we can achieve in 2010 with that kind of brain-power?
Well, here is his proposals in his own words from the Change.gov (pre-deletion) site:
Address Gun Violence in Cities: As president, Barack Obama would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals who shouldn't have them. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent, as such weapons belong on foreign battlefields and not on our streets.
The repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment means anyone as possible access to gun purchase/ownership records. This permits the loons to file the frivilous lawsuits against gun manufacturers and owners. The amendments forbids the BATFE from releasing these records. The absence of said amendment did not prevent or even delay in any way, LEAs from accessing the data.
The gun show and childproof guns are merely smokescreens to make it harder to by/sell guns of an kind. Depending on the language used, no childproof lock would be adequate. What various governments have referred to as Assault Weapons is in itself a joke. I can almost understand the outlawing of automatic weapons. We all know how many murders and assaults have been committed with automatic weapons (/). As far as I am concerned the only difference between an Assault Rifle and a hunting rifle is appearance. That apparently counts for a lot to these metra-sexuals.
85![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:18pm |
re: #62 Daisy
Have you read Thomas Hardy's "The Mayor of Castorbridge"? So sad.
Long Long time ago..
It's a line from the Blue Brothers movie while they are trying to Put the band back together.
86![]() |
Wyatt Earp Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:26pm |
re: #82 Ben Hur
Well, it's a mitzvah to "have relations" on Friday night, so I suggest Black Label and Viagra.
A true "cocktail." Sorry, that was crass.
87![]() |
dentate Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:53pm |
You only punch yourself out when you start swinging blind.— Devo
Can Charles quote Devo (= de-evolution) without upsetting creationists?
88![]() |
Kenneth Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:29:56pm |
Diplomats say the U.S. and key allies are objecting to an International Atomic Energy Agency offer to help Syria as it considers building a civilian nuclear power plant.
Party poopers!
90![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:30:18pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
The Buddhist statue debacle all over again from the tolerant religion of peace? Beauty.
91![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:30:20pm |
re: #83 yochanan
Man, that's a decision only you can make. Sometimes I can't even make it for myself :-)
94![]() |
noraono Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:31:08pm |
Today my company started a new wave of layoffs, only 3 let go today. One an 8 year employee, just a few years away from retirement. Another the bane of my existence. Our corp. has mandated 15% layoffs in the coming months.
My future is secure but it's going to be a tough 2009 for everyone. My prayers for everyone in the same boat.
96![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:31:09pm |
97![]() |
funky chicken Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:31:23pm |
re: #36 turn
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
Perhaps stressing federalism is a way to keep everybody in the big tent. The evangelicals really just became a dominant force in the GOP in the eighties/early nineties. They did it right, meaning they showed up in force at local offices and took over things from the grass roots level. They are extremely passionate about abortion and homosexuality, and are resistant to discussing that perhaps those issues should be dealt with at the local and/or state level...but perhaps many of them would be willing to consider the federalist argument. Fred Thompson would perhaps be a good choice to help convince them....I like Michael Steele very much, but in his interview on Hannity's radio show yesterday, he stressed abortion as on of the key pillars that the GOP should use to win back the majority.
Sorry, but he's wrong about that.....especially at the federal level. Even at the state level abortion bans seem to fail when put to the vote.
99![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:07pm |
100![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:17pm |
re: #42 jemima
#21 3 Wood
If you're still around maybe you could shoot me an email. Galloping Granny thought that maybe it would be good for us to chat.
I'm trying but so far you addy is not coming up. I'll keep trying.
101![]() |
dentate Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:20pm |
re: #82 Ben Hur
Well, it's a mitzvah to "have relations" on Friday night, so I suggest Black Label and Viagra.
Is Black Label kosher?
102![]() |
joncelli Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:25pm |
re: #83 yochanan
All caps and bold is a pretty good indicator that it's time to put down the keyboard. (That way you can drink two-fisted!)
103![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:27pm |
re: #78 Iron Fist
Yeah, if we were just more like the Democrats we'd win? You are never going to get to the Left of the Democrats, so if that's your plan for winning, you are always going to lose.
Always.
Agree 100%.
104![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:27pm |
re: #96 reine.de.tout
sorry i forgot the old internet caps rule FRANKLY I LIKE CAPS
105![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:34pm |
re: #85 saberry0530
Long Long time ago..
It's a line from the Blue Brothers movie while they are trying to Put the band back together.
Really? I'm off to Netflix (there was a copy of the BB in the house .. but where?) - be right back :)
106![]() |
Who Watches the Watchmen? Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:32:55pm |
I'm verklempt from all this hopenchanginess.
107![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:33:02pm |
re: #59 Soona'
It was founded on both.
I was reading some stuff about Lincoln earlier today, I'm no historian believe me. I read he struggled with the separation of the constitution and religion, with Calvinism. I'm not so sure the first GOP president believed it was, or should be, founded on both.
108![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:33:15pm |
re: #99 reine.de.tout
IRON FIST some how i don't think wifie would let me look up reine de tout
109![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:33:42pm |
re: #105 Daisy
Really? I'm off to Netflix (there was a copy of the BB in the house .. but where?) - be right back :)
Be on the lookout for the restaurant scene.
110![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:21pm |
re: #106 Who Watches the Watchmen?
I'm verklempt from all this hopenchanginess.
For someone that promises change from the status quo in D.C., why in the world is he hiring all them old Clinton strap hangers?
111![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:25pm |
re: #42 jemima
It keeps telling me that your name cannot be matched with a name on the address list.
112![]() |
Kenneth Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:32pm |
Stupid fat-assed snaggle-toothed loser mouthing off again,
Iraq's al-Sadr renews threats to attack US
Too bad the twerp is in Iran hiding behind the mullahs' skirts while his fighters back in Iraq have been decimated.
114![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:45pm |
remember jewish women are the real bosses. i think sometimes they don't even know it. HELP ME BROTHERS.
115![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:34:51pm |
re: #95 taxfreekiller
We need to find some tea to dump into a harbor somewhere.
No taxation without representation!
116![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:35:20pm |
A nice story for a drinking thread:
A teacher gave her fifth grade class an assignment. Get their parents to tell them a story with a moral at the end of it. The next day the kids came back and one by one began to tell their stories.
'Tony, do you have a story to share?'
'Yes ma'am. My daddy told a story about my Aunt Nancy. She was a pilot in Desert Storm and her plane got hit. She had to bail out over enemy territory and all she had was a flask of whiskey, a pistol and a survival knife.
She drank the whiskey on the way down so it wouldn't break and then her parachute landed right in the middle of twenty enemy troops. She shot fifteen of them with the gun until she ran out of bullets, killed four more with the knife, till the blade broke, and then she killed the last Iraqi with her bare hands.'
'Good Heavens' said the horrified teacher. 'What kind of moral did your daddy tell you from this horrible story ?'
'Stay the Fuck Away from Aunt Nancy when she's drinking.'
117![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:35:21pm |
re: #111 3 wood
It keeps telling me that your name cannot be matched with a name on the address list.
Then you blue your name and I'll contact you. I've only been here under this name for about 5 years.
118![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:36:26pm |
re: #115 Harry Tuttle
Did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?
I'm going for a beer. Anyone?
119![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:36:43pm |
3 Wood
See if this helps. (It always worked before.)
121![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:37:40pm |
122![]() |
kcladderman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:09pm |
re: #116 karmic_inquisitor
That one made me laugh out loud.
123![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:12pm |
re: #107 turn
I was reading some stuff about Lincoln earlier today, I'm no historian believe me. I read he struggled with the separation of the constitution and religion, with Calvinism. I'm not so sure the first GOP president believed it was, or should be, founded on both.
In your post you didn't say "religion", you said "the Bible".
124![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:30pm |
re: #121 Harry Tuttle
3 OF THEM AND I AM PICKLED STILL GOT ONE TO GO
125![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:34pm |
re: #109 saberry0530
Be on the lookout for the restaurant scene.
Chez Paul's? Ordered. #36 on my queue. It's worth waiting for.
126![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:38:41pm |
re: #84 Outrider
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds. I've seen the gun controlers described as "Goldilocks" before because no gun is ever just right. They're too big or too small or too cheap or too expensive and on and on.
They will never be satisfied because they don't want to be satisfied. It's not about controlling crime, it is just about control.
We need to learn that compromise will never work with them. They've told us plain enough, but there's always someone that thinks a compromise is a good idea.
It isn't.
128![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:39:10pm |
re: #83 yochanan
HOW MANY RUSPUTINS DO I HAVE TO HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE IRON FIST RULE?
HELP ME BROTHER
Two drinks ago.
Go to bed.
129![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:39:10pm |
DAMN stuff is great ranks up there with chimay ale
130![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:40:19pm |
re: #127 Iron Fist
I kinda doubt it, myself :-)
she might be happy i will be out of her hair for some time hehe
131![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:41:06pm |
re: #128 3 wood
hehe i am in a good mood haven't been since the election
132![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:41:18pm |
I'm anti-gun control for the US but pro for Canada. Reason is I live in Canada and have a hot temper.
134![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:42:10pm |
re: #126 Iron Fist
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds. I've seen the gun controlers described as "Goldilocks" before because no gun is ever just right. They're too big or too small or too cheap or too expensive and on and on.
They will never be satisfied because they don't want to be satisfied. It's not about controlling crime, it is just about control.
We need to learn that compromise will never work with them. They've told us plain enough, but there's always someone that thinks a compromise is a good idea.
It isn't.
Much like many of the comments I'm seeing on this thread about the direction the GOP should go. (By the way, a RINO is a RINO is a RINO, ect.)
135![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:42:19pm |
136![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:42:31pm |
will do iron fist on my last one will save the chimay ale for later
137![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:43:18pm |
re: #36 turn
“Big question -- what can they (GOP) do about it (becoming a majority party)? Really, not much. The GOP is out of step with a public that is increasingly libertarian on social matters, yet their religious wing won't let them shift on those issues.” – kos, commenting on Tim Pawlenty
Turn flying pig moment, I finally agree with him on something. Seriously, conservatives have to stop letting hot button issues like pro-life / pro-choice and creation / evolution and gay marriage strip off more and more votes from the GOP. I realize many feel strongly one way or another on these hot button issues and they are debated here by people WAY smarter than me, but the divide they are creating is bound to kill the party if it isn’t resolved IMO. Wasn’t our nation founded on the constitution instead of the bible?
This sounds a lot like the "become your enemy to defeat him" argument. You don't get more people in your organization by lowering your standards. You get more by raising them. McCain certainly didn't get nominated by the socons in the party......just the opposite, and he was a miserable failure. Mediocrity and lack of conservative values in a candidate are why conservatives stay home. And contrary to popular belief, it's not socons who run the Republican party. That's just the party with values closest to their own.
138![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:43:42pm |
was fun chatting with my son as he was cleaning his m-16
139![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:43:57pm |
re: #97 funky chicken
Perhaps stressing federalism is a way to keep everybody in the big tent. The evangelicals really just became a dominant force in the GOP in the eighties/early nineties. They did it right, meaning they showed up in force at local offices and took over things from the grass roots level. They are extremely passionate about abortion and homosexuality, and are resistant to discussing that perhaps those issues should be dealt with at the local and/or state level...but perhaps many of them would be willing to consider the federalist argument. Fred Thompson would perhaps be a good choice to help convince them....I like Michael Steele very much, but in his interview on Hannity's radio show yesterday, he stressed abortion as on of the key pillars that the GOP should use to win back the majority.
Sorry, but he's wrong about that.....especially at the federal level. Even at the state level abortion bans seem to fail when put to the vote.
I agree and I really believe people can be civilized and decent and still be atheist, gay and/or pro-choice. I don't think government has a role in encouraging or enforcing traditional values or behaviors, at least at the federal level. The constitution will keep us decent and civilized.
140![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:44:18pm |
re: #97 funky chicken
The "social" issues should be decided on the state level by legislatures or referenda. They should not be decided by deconstructionist judges imposing their own celestial visions of enlightened morality.
That is where most of the party can come together, IMO.
141![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:44:34pm |
142![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:44:36pm |
re: #61 Wyatt Earp
Kanye West doesn't care about white people.
This White person isn't too fond of him, either.
145![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:40pm |
Went to the grocery store today. I used the restroom & there was a sign on the door that said, "Please be sure that the door is unlocked before exiting."
Can't argue with that, but I would have added, "Please be sure that the door is open before you walk out."
146![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:48pm |
re: #137 eschew_obfuscation
Mediocrity and lack of conservative values in a candidate are why conservatives stay home.
I've heard that over and over in the last few months. But what kind of spoiled brats are the social conservatives if they won't put a little water in their wine and vote for candidates that come closest to their views? Will they be happy with a left-liberal administration? Is cutting off your nose to spite your face part of the conservative value system?
147![]() |
3 wood Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:52pm |
re: #119 jemima
3 Wood
See if this helps. (It always worked before.)
It still does not work for me, but it could be the computer I'm using.
I'll try it later from home.
148![]() |
Ben Hur Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:45:53pm |
149![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:46:38pm |
got a bore snake waiting to send to him
you would think a military would provide that sort of thing wondering if they will charge him duty on the import.
150![]() |
jemima Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:46:51pm |
re: #147 3 wood
It still does not work for me, but it could be the computer I'm using.
I'll try it later from home.
Okey dokey. Thanks for trying.
151![]() |
Daisy Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:46:59pm |
Heads up to you fellows having 'wife problems'
Don't give up. Keep listening. That goes for the song and for the women in your lucky lives.
152![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:47:32pm |
re: #148 Ben Hur
no problem he seems to be very happy about it.
153![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:47:39pm |
re: #146 Moe Katz
I've heard that over and over in the last few months. But what kind of spoiled brats are the social conservatives if they won't put a little water in their wine and vote for candidates that come closest to their views? Will they be happy with a left-liberal administration? Is cutting off your nose to spite your face part of the conservative value system?
I don't agree with those choosing to stay home at all! I even like your "spoiled brats" term. In general, you're right....cutting off their noses to spite their faces.
It was stupid in 2006 and it's just as stupid today.
155![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:48:56pm |
"Nothing reveals Mr. Obama's visceral hostility to business more than the constant urging of our best and brightest to desert the productive private sector ('greed') and go in to public service like politics or community organizing (i.e., organizing people to press government for more handouts). Who in his ideal world would bake our bread, make our shoes and computers, and pilot our airplanes is not clear."
-- George Newman, an economist and retired business executive
156![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:49:16pm |
re: #143 taxfreekiller
I think voting should be your personal responsibility.
You need to care enough to learn the issues and choices and then to get off your but and make your voice heard.
You shouldn't vote to get a boon.
Likewise proactive voter registration should be banned. This can only encourage fraud, these organizations will never be non partisan.
You have the right to vote, either exercise it yourself or lose it.
157![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:49:19pm |
Howdy.
Well, to me, in spite of the down market and various hassles at work, it's been a Kimberful day.
(Meaning, I am finally in actual possesion of my M1911)
158![]() |
Outrider Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:49:39pm |
re: #126 Iron Fist
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds. I've seen the gun controlers described as "Goldilocks" before because no gun is ever just right. They're too big or too small or too cheap or too expensive and on and on.
They will never be satisfied because they don't want to be satisfied. It's not about controlling crime, it is just about control.
We need to learn that compromise will never work with them. They've told us plain enough, but there's always someone that thinks a compromise is a good idea.
It isn't.
Sadly there can be no compromise. With the anti-gun freaks, it the stereotypical "give an inch, they want a mile". I remember when the Brady law was enacted, the first response of the coalition was to state it was a start.
159![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:50:26pm |
re: #134 Soona'
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
160![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:06pm |
re: #156 Harry Tuttle
From the survey at took at the poll, my area is thinking of doing away with voting precincts. Anybody can vote anywhere in town.
Can you imagine the fraud?
161![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:08pm |
re: #139 turn
I agree and I really believe people can be civilized and decent and still be atheist, gay and/or pro-choice. I don't think government has a role in encouraging or enforcing traditional values or behaviors, at least at the federal level. The constitution will keep us decent and civilized.
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
162![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:13pm |
re: #157 Occasional Reader
Howdy.
Well, to me, in spite of the down market and various hassles at work, it's been a Kimberful day.
(Meaning, I am finally in actual possesion of my M1911)
Woot! (whatever that means - the kids seem to think it's good)
Congrats.....now, will they let you buy ammunition that goes "BANG" when you pull the trigger?
163![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:51:43pm |
The media and academic establishment of our society seems to be telling us: "America is becoming a minority white nation. People of color are soon to be the majority. Therefore, Obama's policies will become the mainstream."
I don't know and frankly don't care what the race of the majority of Americans happens to be. All I care is that America becomes, once again, a free country. A free country benefits all people "of color." (And, by the way, isn't white a color, too?)
When I hear that America is becoming less white and therefore more socialist (or “progressive” if you prefer the euphemism), I become angry. Why? Because it's insulting to assume that just because someone isn't white that they must be socialist and statist. Maybe most non-whites are socialist, right now. But that doesn't mean it's in their interest, or that they’re right.
Freedom and capitalism and individual rights are in everyone's interest. They're in your interest if you want to be free, to be productive, to work and to think. And even if you don't care to be free, to be productive, to work and to think -- freedom and capitalism are still in your interest. There's no comfort for either the lazy or the productive -- for the intelligent or for the stupid -- in a society where the best and brightest are not allowed to flourish. Everybody needs excellence: Both those who value it, and those who don’t.
This is the lesson that essentially every nation and culture in human history has learned the hard way. America was supposed to be the exception.
164![]() |
FightingBack Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:07pm |
I just read today that 68% of my town voted for Obama.
Limousine Liberals.
165![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:24pm |
re: #159 Iron Fist
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
I fully concur, Sir!
166![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:46pm |
re: #37 Harry Tuttle
You can get Penguin copies of Atlas Shrugged for about $8. I have given a few out. 'Course I really don't expect them to get read, but who knows.
It's a great mystery story.
167![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:52:56pm |
the hispanic and black vote was very anti gay 75% of the black and hispanic vote voted against the gay admendemnt. problem is race is complex issue.
168![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:02pm |
re: #159 Iron Fist
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
Not to mention the difficulty of following an 8-year Rep. incumbent when the economy is in catastrophic trouble. Sometimes the pendulum just swings, and it swings blindly.
169![]() |
WrathofG-d Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:36pm |
170![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:38pm |
re: #97 funky chicken
Perhaps stressing federalism is a way to keep everybody in the big tent. The evangelicals really just became a dominant force in the GOP in the eighties/early nineties. They did it right, meaning they showed up in force at local offices and took over things from the grass roots level. They are extremely passionate about abortion and homosexuality, and are resistant to discussing that perhaps those issues should be dealt with at the local and/or state level...but perhaps many of them would be willing to consider the federalist argument. Fred Thompson would perhaps be a good choice to help convince them....I like Michael Steele very much, but in his interview on Hannity's radio show yesterday, he stressed abortion as on of the key pillars that the GOP should use to win back the majority.
Sorry, but he's wrong about that.....especially at the federal level. Even at the state level abortion bans seem to fail when put to the vote.
I think the issue of abortion should be argued from a federalist perspective.
Before Roe (where rights were created out of thin air) the states regulated abortion. Roe took it away. What is wrong with letting the states decide - especially when the states are the ones on the hook for the consequences.
Roe short circuited democracy, just as the fabrication of a same sex marriage right was fabricated by the courts here. Many who voted for 8 did it because the courts had pissed them off.
The theme for 2010 should be "let us decide". The Democrats are trying to institute "Soft Paternalism" but paternalism is paternalism. Let states make more decisions. Let individuals make more decisions. Get the social engineers in congress and the courts out of the way.
What is the point of fighting for a free country when the federal government appoints itself to make decisions for you?
171![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:40pm |
re: #123 Soona'
In your post you didn't say "religion", you said "the Bible".
Yes, and the bible is a collection of religious writings. I guess I using them synonymously. Do you have a comment about hot button issues?
172![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:53:47pm |
re: #159 Iron Fist
If we don't have any core principles, what makes us any different than the Democrats? The complaints that I was hearing were that the candidates were too much alike. I felt that was really unfair to McCain, because he was very fundamentally different than Obama. But he was seen as being to squishy by a lot of the people in my State.
It wasn't our being too Right-wing that cost us. The anti-Gay Marriage position won everywhere it was put forth, including California. What cost us was that we didn't bring the base out. As different as the candidates were, there were a lot of people who stayed home. McCain didn't excite the Party. Palin did, but not enough, it would seem.
And then there was the black vote. The Democrats usually take the preponderance of that, but this time it was almost 100%. I don't know that there was anything that we could have done about that.
That and the fact that Mac never really took the offensive where Obama did
Mac could have taken the economic and character issues (and others) much farther and who knows if that would have made a difference. It certainly could have. This election was the republicans to lose and they did so splendidly.
173![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:54:23pm |
re: #163 gmsc
Because it's insulting to assume that just because someone isn't white that they must be socialist and statist.
Hear hear.
And assuming that Obama's "policies" are a result of his skin color, as the author indicated is a statement being made lately, and that these are also the "policies" of every one of color is insulting and flat out racism.
174![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:54:35pm |
re: #161 Soona'
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
We already fought a war over that. Remember?
175![]() |
whiterasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:54:36pm |
re: #145 opnion
The health and safety kooks are starting to annoy me.
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
The manager of one place told me it can't be served too hot because of "liability".
Liability, bullshit. I want my damn soup HOT!
176![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:55:04pm |
re: #157 Occasional Reader
Howdy.
Well, to me, in spite of the down market and various hassles at work, it's been a Kimberful day.
(Meaning, I am finally in actual possesion of my M1911)
Congrats!
177![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:55:13pm |
re: #158 Outrider
Yep. There really isn't any compromise with them, because they never give anything back. They take what they can get with the intent of coming for more the moment that they can.
We need to be like them. Heller is just the start. We need to keep going until we have all of our rights protected by the State. To the point that no one brings up the possibility of gun control any more than they'd try and reinstitute slavery.
179![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:55:33pm |
iran fired a test missle just wait for the real thing.
180![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:12pm |
re: #67 joncelli
Current conditions in Anchorage, AK. (Be careful what you wish for.)
It that Celsius?
Concerned in California.
181![]() |
Moe Katz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:22pm |
re: #175 whiterasta
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
I take it you ordered beef and barely soup.
182![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:28pm |
re: #129 yochanan
DAMN stuff is great ranks up there with chimay ale
What the heck are you drinking, Belgian beer? I want some of that. Ha
183![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:50pm |
re: #167 yochanan
the hispanic and black vote was very anti gay 75% of the black and hispanic vote voted against the gay admendemnt. problem is race is complex issue.
I agree with your percentages but I don't agree that voting against gay marriage is anti-gay by definition. One can fully agree with the right to be gay, or even be gay onself, and still not believe that marriage laws should apply.
184![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:56:58pm |
re: #8 Salem
I seem to recall a lot of people on this forum refused to support Rudy in part because they suspected him of wanting to magically confiscate our guns. Now we have a Dem monopoly with a gun owner's worst nightmare in the White House.
Yep, we're all really gonna want to put our support behind the socons now, huh? Who knows what we can achieve in 2010 with that kind of brain-power?
Realistically, Giuliani wouldn't have wasted any political capital on another national gun ban, regardless of how he conducted himself as Mayor of NYC.
Ultimately, the only one responsible for Giuliani's loss in the primary is Giuliani. His "put all the chips on Florida" was (retrospectively) a flawed strategy.
Had he received the nomination, I suspect that most of the SOCONs would have ultimately rallied around him, the way they did around McCain. You may recall that eight years ago McCain said something bashing the religious right. That (arguably) ended up costing him the State of SC, and the Republican nomination for POTUS. The point is, if the religious right could go back back McCain, why wouldn't they have ultimately backed Giuliani?
But really, who is to say Giuliani would have beaten Obama? He may have. . .he may not have. (Though he certainly WOULD have trashed Obama during the debates. . .all of them).
185![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:21pm |
re: #112 Kenneth
Stupid fat-assed snaggle-toothed loser mouthing off again
Until I clicked, I was sure you meant Huckabee.
187![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:39pm |
re: #182 turn
today i am doint old reasputin russian impearl stout... ( damn spelling)
almost as good as chimay ale....
188![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:41pm |
re: #175 whiterasta
The health and safety kooks are starting to annoy me.
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
The manager of one place told me it can't be served too hot because of "liability".Liability, bullshit. I want my damn soup HOT!
Dang, I'll sign a waiver. Just heat it up.
189![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:49pm |
re: #177 Iron Fist
Yep. There really isn't any compromise with them, because they never give anything back. They take what they can get with the intent of coming for more the moment that they can.
We need to be like them. Heller is just the start. We need to keep going until we have all of our rights protected by the State. To the point that no one brings up the possibility of gun control any more than they'd try and reinstitute slavery.
Yup. What he said.
190![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:57:59pm |
re: #179 yochanan
iran fired a test missle just wait for the real thing.
My best uneducated guess is that Pooty Poot will start/resume gobbling up countries and Obama will convene NATO or the UN security council and have them issue a harshly worded letter in response.
191![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:58:18pm |
re: #176 Soona'
Congrats!
Thank you.
Gotta take it to the range this weekend and start breaking it in... the thing is tight as a tick.
192![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 1:59:15pm |
personally i doubt the mayor would have won and i liked john mccain too
hard to say who would have been better.
193![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:00:27pm |
Some of you will appreciate this:
194![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:00:33pm |
chit is going to hit the fan as joe biden said i will support the military who ever is POTUS.
195![]() |
Iron Fist Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:00:39pm |
re: #157 Occasional Reader
Congrats :-)
I had a pic of a cute little Bennelli with a 14" barrel that I was going to put up, but I can't find it. If you 've got to be registered, get something with authority :-)
196![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:03pm |
Saw DEVO at the Del Mar Racetrack two months ago...
They were AWESOME!
Mark Mothersbaugh said something like,
"Here we are surrounded by synthetic turf and horse turds...and you think de-evolution isn't real?
I laughed my ass off.
197![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:05pm |
re: #170 karmic_inquisitor
I think the issue of abortion should be argued from a federalist perspective.
Before Roe (where rights were created out of thin air) the states regulated abortion. Roe took it away. What is wrong with letting the states decide - especially when the states are the ones on the hook for the consequences.
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
198![]() |
unclassifiable Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:27pm |
re: #161 Soona'
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
At what point do we say let the individual decide vs. the state vs. federal government? It's a tricky thing but when we advocate local control the question always is how local do you want.
199![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:01:57pm |
re: #175 whiterasta
The health and safety kooks are starting to annoy me.
Twice this week I have sent my soup back, because it was served barley warm.
The manager of one place told me it can't be served too hot because of "liability".Liability, bullshit. I want my damn soup HOT!
I does get silly. I was looking at end of season gas grills on sale.
More than a few had lablels warning, "Do not use indoors"
200![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:02:38pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
Isn't that kind of the point of states rights? Don't tread on me.
201![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:03:26pm |
re: #126 Iron Fist
Yeah, the "Assault Rifle" thing is pretty much cosmetic. After they get that, the next thing up is "sniper" rifles. They've already made noises about it here and there. They're starting with the .50 caliber weapons. You know, those easily concealable guns that are five feet long and weigh nearly 50 pounds.
A "sniper" rifle is any centerfire rifle with a telescopic sight. In other words pretty much EVERY hunting rifle would classify as a "sniper" rifle under any legitimate classification of such. (And in fact, many military sniper rifles essentially are specialized hunting rifles).
As to the horrible .50 caliber guns, those also cost nearly $2000, with rounds at $3 EACH, and so far as I know, there has never been ANY violent crime committed with one in the history of the USA, EVER.
Its literally physically impossible to mug someone with one, and next to impossible to actually rob a bank with one.
The pols are afraid of them for a very simple reason. . ..50 cal rifles in the hands of civilians endanger the gov't monopoly on violence. More to the point, politicans are scared of them, because its far harder to quell civilian resistance if scattered civilians have these weapons.
202![]() |
yochanan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:03:52pm |
NO MORE POSTS THANKS TO THE IRON FIST RULE AS WELL AS THE CLOCK
203![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:03pm |
I'm a socon and I'm for letting the states decide on abortion.
204![]() |
whiterasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:10pm |
re: #199 opnion
I think there is a website out there that features stupid warnings on products.
205![]() |
wright1 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:29pm |
re: #183 Silhouette
I agree with your percentages but I don't agree that voting against gay marriage is anti-gay by definition. One can fully agree with the right to be gay, or even be gay oneself, and still not believe that marriage laws should apply.
Agreed. The notion that because you endorse traditional values and in this case, marriage, as a concept defined between a man and a woman, does not make "anti-gay." For some like myself, I don't agree with the lifestyle but, I can love the sinner and hate the sin. On a personal note, my brother is gay so I am not unfamiliar to this issue. But my love for him does not ameliorate my own core principles. The notion of "gay marriage is an anathema to me. On many levels, I do not support it. That is a far cry from asking the State to ban their lifestyle - on the contrary, I just don't wan it sanctioned by the State. And I suspect many more agree with this but due to P.C. they have lost their ability to object.
206![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:04:37pm |
Well, at any rate, it's Obama now. I don't honestly think Jindal will be the next nominee, anyway. It may be Palin, though I'm not certain that would be a good thing. There will be a lot of factors, some of which no doubt are no doubt beyond our knowing at the present.
208![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:05:05pm |
re: #137 eschew_obfuscation
This sounds a lot like the "become your enemy to defeat him" argument. You don't get more people in your organization by lowering your standards. You get more by raising them. McCain certainly didn't get nominated by the socons in the party......just the opposite, and he was a miserable failure. Mediocrity and lack of conservative values in a candidate are why conservatives stay home. And contrary to popular belief, it's not socons who run the Republican party. That's just the party with values closest to their own.
Thank you for providing another perspective eschew. How would you characterize "by raising them (standards)". Does this mean we build the base by insisting every conservative be pro-life, anti gay marriage, and a creationist with the notion that only liberals hold opposing viewpoints or beliefs?
209![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:05:59pm |
re: #204 whiterasta
I think there is a website out there that features stupid warnings on products.
I'm going to look for it. I am at once amused & bemused by some of them.
210![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:08pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Some of you will appreciate this:
Why are people so hung up on embryonic stem cell research? At this point, any benefit from it is just speculation, while adult stem cell research has provided real medical benefits and new discoveries have basically obviated the need for embryonic cells.
Perhaps this is why all of the arguments appear to be couched in terms of "stem cell research", leaving off the "embryonic" and ignoring the fact that adult stem cell research is legal and federally funded almost everywhere.
This is just like the "illegal immigration" issue. "illegal" is always left out of the discussion and it becomes all about "immigration".
All attempts to move the goal posts when an argument is losing.
211![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:30pm |
re: #206 Salem
Well, at any rate, it's Obama now. I don't honestly think Jindal will be the next nominee, anyway. It may be Palin, though I'm not certain that would be a good thing. There will be a lot of factors, some of which no doubt are no doubt beyond our knowing at the present.
I like Palin but man there are a lot of battles between here and there at this point.
It's a big shit sandwich and we all gotta take a big bite.
212![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:35pm |
re: #171 turn
Yes, and the bible is a collection of religious writings. I guess I using them synonymously. Do you have a comment about hot button issues?
I can read the Bible and be inspired without being associated with any religion. And as far as "hot buttons" are concerned, if it's not abortion or religion then it will be something else. There have always been items of hot debate in every election. There were hot buttons when Reagen won his landslide victory. Why? Because his conservative message was strong and sure, made with confidence, with no back-tracking or wimping out because some poll showed some focus group of people didn't like what he was saying.
213![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:06:50pm |
re: #205 wright1
One of the best concise yet comprehensive posts on opposition to gay marriage was posted here by a man who happens to be gay.
214![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:07:27pm |
re: #10 Killgore Trout
Beware the Anti-Statues Resistance Committee.....
Artists under attack from Muslim hardliners
Heh.
i think it's mark steyn who talks abt this in his book "america alone".
at some point museums and galleries in europe will be pressured to remove or cover paintings and sculpture that are deemed offensive to moslem sensibilities.
this will include masterpieces that have been loved and admired for centuries.
stealth jihad on art is a way to rob people of pride in their culture and diminish the value of their accomplishments.
there will be a lot of calligraphy and tile work to look at if these barbarians get their way.
215![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:07:39pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
Which makes them the RINOs in my opinion - who are they to impose a religious precept on everyone else? There are many religions where abortion is allowed, Judaism being one. My religion doesn't allow it, but there are many things my religion bans that are legal - like adultery and contraception.
I don't understand how, given all of human history, we still have people thinking that we can use the laws of the state to create a moral population. It doesn't even work in Saudi Arabia or Iran.
216![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:07:51pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Interesting article. Writer could not bring himself to vote Republican...I hope he read this guy's comment:
I can understand some people's disgust with the Republican party. However, both major parties are coalitions of groups with both similar and differing views. The Republican party is a coalition of business people, supporters of free markets, libertarians, 2nd Amendment gun owners, the religious right and other conservatives. The Democratic party is a coalition of liberals, socialists, communists, labor unions, America haters, multiculturalists and minorities that want government handouts.
WELL SAID...
217![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:14pm |
re: #146 Moe Katz
I've heard that over and over in the last few months. But what kind of spoiled brats are the social conservatives if they won't put a little water in their wine and vote for candidates that come closest to their views? Will they be happy with a left-liberal administration? Is cutting off your nose to spite your face part of the conservative value system?
Exactly. I don't really buy into the notion that conservatives are staying home because of these issues, maybe just the socons.
218![]() |
GeeWiz Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:24pm |
After reading thru the previous thread and watching this video, I think GWB should hold an evening televised speech and announce that his military advisers have informed him of a Iraq victory and he is awaiting their advice on troop withdrawal. Not to be done right away, but sometime before Jan. 15.
219![]() |
Salem Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:24pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
And if women in such a desperate situation are forced to do that, the socons still come out looking like a bunch of throwbacks.
220![]() |
whiterasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:08:30pm |
221![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:09:28pm |
re: #195 Iron Fist
Congrats :-)
I had a pic of a cute little Bennelli with a 14" barrel that I was going to put up, but I can't find it. If you 've got to be registered, get something with authority :-)
Yep, unforunately the Black Helicopters know where to find me...
(kidding... I think)
The good news is, while the last time I registered a firearm in DC it took almost 3 months, this time it took, in total, about 2 hours. Much improved.
222![]() |
FightingBack Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:09:40pm |
re: #188 Silhouette
Waiver, Shmaiver.
You can still sue.
223![]() |
looking closely Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:10:11pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
This may be true, but in converse, the reason why the liberals are against State control there is for the exact opposite reason. Namely, because there would be States that would likely further restrict abortion, or possibly ban it altogether. (Though in practice, abortion isn't readily available in lots of the places that would ban it anyway).
Personally, from my perspective as a voter, this is a non-issue. Support or opposition to abortion isn't by itself a criteria by which I decide whom to vote for.
224![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:10:18pm |
re: #210 eschew_obfuscation
Why are people so hung up on embryonic stem cell research? At this point, any benefit from it is just speculation, while adult stem cell research has provided real medical benefits and new discoveries have basically obviated the need for embryonic cells.
Perhaps this is why all of the arguments appear to be couched in terms of "stem cell research", leaving off the "embryonic" and ignoring the fact that adult stem cell research is legal and federally funded almost everywhere.
This is just like the "illegal immigration" issue. "illegal" is always left out of the discussion and it becomes all about "immigration".
All attempts to move the goal posts when an argument is losing.
IIRC, embryonic stem cell research is legal, but the federal funding of it is not. If there were any real promise in embryonic stem cells, you'd think some bright young researcher would get private funding and go on to make a mint. In reality, adult stem cells are where they're seeing results.
225![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:08pm |
BTW - banning abortions does not stop abortions.
Here is info on a study which found abortion rates in countries where it is banned to be the same as those where it is legal.
Morality is a matter of the choices we make not the laws we live under.
226![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:09pm |
re: #198 unclassifiable
At what point do we say let the individual decide vs. the state vs. federal government? It's a tricky thing but when we advocate local control the question always is how local do you want.
The Constitution just mentions states. So if the state legislatures want to give control of such things to communities, then it's their business.
227![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:19pm |
re: #161 Soona'
I think what conservatives want is an end to the federal mandates, either from the congress or the courts. Give us states rights back where it belongs. If an individual finds the morals of any one state to his distaste, then he should just move along to another state with whose values he agrees.
I agree 100%. In fact I was going to say that in my original post but thought I would be biting off more than I could chew.
228![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:22pm |
re: #201 looking closely
The pols are afraid of them for a very simple reason. . ..50 cal rifles in the hands of civilians endanger the gov't monopoly on violence.
That line of reasoning has always struck me as a little problematic.
Would we really want, say, Stinger missiles to be freely, legally available to anyone with ready cash? How about nukes? Etc. There is some "line drawing" that comes into play, at some point.
229![]() |
akak Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:12:51pm |
Looks like Gaby Ashkenazi got to much credit, he's heading into Halutz territory! Does he just want to keep his job or what?
230![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:13:39pm |
re: #208 turn
Thank you for providing another perspective eschew. How would you characterize "by raising them (standards)". Does this mean we build the base by insisting every conservative be pro-life, anti gay marriage, and a creationist with the notion that only liberals hold opposing viewpoints or beliefs?
No. I believe we raise the standards by nominating people who are, at least, fiscal conservatives and, additionally for things like fair immigration policy, and standing up for true diversity of thought and speech, robust support of capitalism, small government, low taxes.
As an aside, I'd mention that I don't think we have, in the last 100 years, found the peak of the Laffer curve, where income tax rates produce the maximum revenue to the government. We've always been on the high (right) side of the curve.
231![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:14:37pm |
re: #174 victor_yugo
We already fought a war over that. Remember?
Slavery was abolished by a constitutional amendment.
232![]() |
caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:14:51pm |
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
233![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:06pm |
re: #214 nyc redneck
i think it's mark steyn who talks abt this in his book "america alone".
at some point museums and galleries in europe will be pressured to remove or cover paintings and sculpture that are deemed offensive to moslem sensibilities.
this will include masterpieces that have been loved and admired for centuries.
stealth jihad on art is a way to rob people of pride in their culture and diminish the value of their accomplishments.
there will be a lot of calligraphy and tile work to look at if these barbarians get their way.
As an art lover, I worry about that a lot. If you removed every work with nudity or religious content from the Louvre, for example, all you'd have left are some butt-ugly modern works that look more like vandalism than art, and maybe a couple of still lifes. I am hoping to spend part of my retirement visiting the great cathedrals, palaces and museums of Europe, but I worry they may not be there in 20 or 30 years.
234![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:07pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
Because of my personal convictions, I would like to see abortion banned.
But the hard and real fact of the matter is that the law is what it is, and it will remain. Abortion will not be banned.
Rather than harping on the fact that abortion is legal, it is much better at this point, and more effective, for individual people to live their lives based on their own personal convictions, and this includes doing what they can to promote a "choice of life", if that is what your convictions tell you is correct.
Gay marriage is an issue that, it seems to me, most people do not want to become a fact. It is not a "conservative" issue.
Evolution vs. creationism - those of us who can should ensure that the candidates that are chosen and promoted for election at the local level are people who can think critically about this issue, and come to the right conclusion, that is, science education should be science, and faith issues should remain in the hands of parents, not the schools. Those elected to national office usually have some sort of local experience to begin with - if we ensure those local officials are thinking straight on this, they will filter upward in the party.
235![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:23pm |
re: #197 Charles
Speaking as a staunch pro-lifer who has worked in the pro-life movement with both Catholics and Evangelicals for over fifteen years, I would say that you are making an unijustified sweeping statement about "social conservatives," whoever they are. A solid majority of the people I've worked with on pro-life issue believe the issue should be decided by legislatures on a state level.
I certainly do.
236![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:32pm |
William Ayers on GMA today said that his bombings were not terrorism because he targeted property not people. Interesting though that his bombs were made with dynamite & nails etc. Those are anti personal bombs according to a former FBI agent on FNC.
He also claimed that he only knew Obama like thousands of others in the neighborhood.
In a new afterward on the reissue of his book he describes Obama as "A neighbor & family friend." Which is it?
237![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:15:55pm |
re: #231 turn
Slavery was abolished by a constitutional amendment.
Well... the amendment was made possible by the war, ya see.
238![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:16:11pm |
re: #225 karmic_inquisitor
BTW - banning abortions does not stop abortions.
Here is info on a study which found abortion rates in countries where it is banned to be the same as those where it is legal.
Morality is a matter of the choices we make not the laws we live under.
Good point.
239![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:16:40pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
...and then we have the far left (Obama) who have no problem with
partial birth abortion & an end to parental consent for minors.
I agree with PJ O Rourke on this one.
240![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:16:43pm |
re: #224 doppelganglander
Yes, and Big Pharma would be absolutely THROWING money at it, and they're not.
241![]() |
boogberg Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:17:33pm |
Any penny-ante investors here? I just opened my first account and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth. :D
242![]() |
vxbush Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:17:44pm |
re: #240 eschew_obfuscation
Yes, and Big Pharma would be absolutely THROWING money at it, and they're not.
DING DING DING! If there were a chance to make money at it, Big pharma and lots of other venture capital folks would be pouring money in. They aren't.
/back to lurking
243![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:18:20pm |
re: #205 wright1
Not all gays, BTW, are in favor of redefining marriage.
But if you think black conservatives are mistreated,........
Well, let's just say that for some people, in this tolerant moonbat world, expressing an un-PC opinion would be physically dangerous.
244![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:18:27pm |
re: #234 reine.de.tout
Because of my personal convictions, I would like to see abortion banned.
But the hard and real fact of the matter is that the law is what it is, and it will remain. Abortion will not be banned.
Rather than harping on the fact that abortion is legal, it is much better at this point, and more effective, for individual people to live their lives based on their own personal convictions, and this includes doing what they can to promote a "choice of life", if that is what your convictions tell you is correct.
Gay marriage is an issue that, it seems to me, most people do not want to become a fact. It is not a "conservative" issue.
Evolution vs. creationism - those of us who can should ensure that the candidates that are chosen and promoted for election at the local level are people who can think critically about this issue, and come to the right conclusion, that is, science education should be science, and faith issues should remain in the hands of parents, not the schools. Those elected to national office usually have some sort of local experience to begin with - if we ensure those local officials are thinking straight on this, they will filter upward in the party.
That says it pretty well.
Here's what I want in order;
limited government
strong national defense
Anything beyond that you need to convince me it's worth our money. Some things will be but the less the better.
245![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:18:44pm |
re: #224 doppelganglander
IIRC, embryonic stem cell research is legal, but the federal funding of it is not.
It's even more qualified than that; federal funding of it is legal, but only with embryonic stem cell lines already in existence at the date Bush signed the relevant Executive Order.
Of course, most lefties are firmly convinced that "Bush banned stem cell research!", and they don't let facts get in their way.
246![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:19:28pm |
re: #216 CalBear84
Interesting article. Writer could not bring himself to vote Republican...I hope he read this guy's comment:
I can understand some people's disgust with the Republican party. However, both major parties are coalitions of groups with both similar and differing views. The Republican party is a coalition of business people, supporters of free markets, libertarians, 2nd Amendment gun owners, the religious right and other conservatives. The Democratic party is a coalition of liberals, socialists, communists, labor unions, America haters, multiculturalists and minorities that want government handouts.WELL SAID...
Indeed. and that is the struggle.
247![]() |
wii42 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:19:28pm |
totally OT:
For musically-inclined lizards who've ever wanted a portable synth/sequencer for $40 (assuming you've got a DS):
248![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:05pm |
re: #228 Occasional Reader
That line of reasoning has always struck me as a little problematic.
Would we really want, say, Stinger missiles to be freely, legally available to anyone with ready cash? How about nukes? Etc. There is some "line drawing" that comes into play, at some point.
Wow! Stinger missiles. Cool!
249![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:09pm |
re: #230 eschew_obfuscation
No. I believe we raise the standards by nominating people who are, at least, fiscal conservatives and, additionally for things like fair immigration policy, and standing up for true diversity of thought and speech, robust support of capitalism, small government, low taxes.
As an aside, I'd mention that I don't think we have, in the last 100 years, found the peak of the Laffer curve, where income tax rates produce the maximum revenue to the government. We've always been on the high (right) side of the curve.
FWIW, it has been my experience in California where the "litmus test" was put in place in 1994 that the litmus test gave us candidates that placed the social agenda well ahead of the fiscal agenda. And it shouldn't surprise anyone - at its core in a person who wants to regulate your morality is someone willing to go along with regulating everything else.
Part of having faith in a democracy is letting people make choices for themselves, even if those choices would damn them to hell.
250![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:10pm |
re: #241 boogberg
Any penny-ante investors here? I just opened my first account and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth. :D
Go for it. You could be in line for a government bailout. :)
251![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:12pm |
re: #232 caliredst8r
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
Because doctors are experts on gun safety.
Just like the NRA are experts on colonoscopies.
252![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:28pm |
re: #241 boogberg
Any penny-ante investors here? I just opened my first account and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth. :D
Just mail me a check for $100 to spread the wealth around.
Not to discourage risk taking, but GM is a black hole. There are other beaten down stocks that will eventually recover and pay you a nice dividend in the meantime.
253![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:20:59pm |
re: #241 boogberg
and I'm thinking of buying some GM stock just for the hell of it. Nothing I wouldn't have pissed away in the bar 25 years ago, mind you. Maybe $100 worth
I'd do it, if I could get a paper certificate. If nothing else, in 30 years it'll have souvenir value. Or, just maybe, it'll be worth millions! (Once the future, revitalized GM comes out with the Jetsons flying car that runs on "Mr. Fusion")
254![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:21:05pm |
re: #237 Occasional Reader
Well... the amendment was made possible by the war, ya see.
And a grant from Kelloggs.
/PBS humor
255![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:21:36pm |
re: #216 CalBear84
Interesting article. Writer could not bring himself to vote Republican...I hope he read this guy's comment:
I can understand some people's disgust with the Republican party. However, both major parties are coalitions of groups with both similar and differing views. The Republican party is a coalition of business people, supporters of free markets, libertarians, 2nd Amendment gun owners, the religious right and other conservatives. The Democratic party is a coalition of liberals, socialists, communists, labor unions, America haters, multiculturalists and minorities that want government handouts.WELL SAID...
It seems that the religious right scared some folks into running into the arms of the Marxists. Of course the Marxist who won this year had to campaign falsely as a conservative.
256![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:21:58pm |
re: #248 Soona'
Wow! Stinger missiles. Cool!
Sure, until you see local students from the nearest King Fahd Academy stocking up on them. Not so cool.
257![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:08pm |
re: #242 vxbush
DING DING DING! If there were a chance to make money at it, Big pharma and lots of other venture capital folks would be pouring money in. They aren't.
/back to lurking
Of course, a big part of BHO's health plan is to penalize big pharma. The fact that this will drain funds for R&D is forgotten.
258![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:14pm |
re: #245 Occasional Reader
Of course, most lefties are firmly convinced that "Bush banned stem cell research!", and they don't let facts get in their way.
Just like they are sure Bush raised the level of arsenic allowable in drinking water.
259![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:15pm |
re: #235 wolfie
Speaking as a staunch pro-lifer who has worked in the pro-life movement with both Catholics and Evangelicals for over fifteen years, I would say that you are making an unijustified sweeping statement about "social conservatives," whoever they are. A solid majority of the people I've worked with on pro-life issue believe the issue should be decided by legislatures on a state level.
I certainly do.
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christian groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
260![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:18pm |
re: #216 CalBear84
Yes, I saw that comment too and thought it was spot on.
With 300+ million people in this country and only 2 political parties, the parties are bound to be coalition based.
This business of "socons" and "RINOs" is obnoxious. Why are people so anxious to slap labels on (usually poorly defined) groups?
261![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:47pm |
re: #254 Silhouette
And a grant from Kelloggs.
/PBS humor
Archer Daniel Midlands!
Big Bird is Big Agro's bitch.
262![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:22:58pm |
re: #249 karmic_inquisitor
FWIW, it has been my experience in California where the "litmus test" was put in place in 1994 that the litmus test gave us candidates that placed the social agenda well ahead of the fiscal agenda. And it shouldn't surprise anyone - at its core in a person who wants to regulate your morality is someone willing to go along with regulating everything else.
Part of having faith in a democracy is letting people make choices for themselves, even if those choices would damn them to hell.
Definitely.....on that we're in total agreement ;-)
263![]() |
Caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:20pm |
re: #251 Silhouette
Maybe they're just worried about the effects of second hand smoke if I happen to shoot the TV again.
264![]() |
Who Watches the Watchmen? Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:30pm |
Prop 8 protests nationwide tomorrow
I thought the election was over. Get it on the ballot again, folks.
265![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:37pm |
re: #244 Harry Tuttle
That says it pretty well.
Here's what I want in order;
limited government
strong national defenseAnything beyond that you need to convince me it's worth our money. Some things will be but the less the better.
Lower, simpler taxes
266![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:23:43pm |
re: #260 wolfie
This business of "socons" and "RINOs" is obnoxious. Why are people so anxious to slap labels on (usually poorly defined) groups?
We should call such people "LabelCons"!
/
267![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:24:22pm |
re: #210 eschew_obfuscation
Why are people so hung up on embryonic stem cell research?
Hope. or false hope. I'm not sure.
268![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:24:51pm |
re: #232 caliredst8r
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
I believe it's a recommendation of the American Academy of ( ed--left wing) Pediatrics to ask this.
PS: was there a question asking if there was a swimming pool in the home?
The reason I am asking is that a child is something like 30 times more likely to die in a backyard pool than he is to shoot himself with the family gun.
Very few children accidentally shoot themselves or others. In fact, most childhood gun deaths are gang violence related.
but don't let that little fact interfere with the anti-gun message of the million mom march and the AAP
269![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:25:25pm |
re: #251 Silhouette
Because doctors are experts on gun safety.
Just like the NRA are experts on colonoscopies.
LOL! (I thought it sounded strange that the NRA would have proctologists, but the guy seemed nice)
270![]() |
DaddyG Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:25:30pm |
I have a unique take on the Gay Marriage issue...
We started down that slippery slope when we started to treat marital status as a category of tax exemption. Take the monetary benefit out of it and leave marriage to the Church where it belongs.
That being said I'd rather see partner benefits and civil unions vs. expanding the definition of marriage to cover whatever the morality de jour decides is kosher.
271![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:16pm |
re: #263 Caliredst8r
Maybe they're just worried about the effects of second hand smoke if I happen to shoot the TV again.
Heh..... If second had smoke were as big a health problem as it's made out to be, all the baby boomers would be dead.
272![]() |
joan Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:37pm |
How can we support Michael Steele? An excellent 21st Century face for the Republican Party; he's a very savvy guy.
MIAMI -- Former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele is running to be the next chairman of the Republican National Committee.
Following the GOP's sweeping losses in last week's elections, Steele said the party in recent years has failed to live up to its principles.
"The Republican Party must present a vision for the future of America that relies on our conservative values and core principles," he said. "It is wrong to believe the voters have suddenly become liberal. They have just lost any sense of confidence that the Republican Party holds the answers to their problems."
Steele was state chairman of the Maryland Republican Party from 2000 to 2002. He was the state's lieutenant governor from 2003-2007, becoming the first black candidate ever elected to a statewide position there. In November 2006, he lost a bid for the U.S. Senate.
"Most Americans today see a Republican Party that defines itself by what it is against rather than what it is for," Steele said in announcing his candidacy Thursday in Miami, where the Republican Governors Association is meeting. "We can tell you why public schools aren't working but not articulate a compelling vision for how we'll better educate children. We're well equipped to rail against tax increases but can't begin to explain how we'll help the poor."
273![]() |
boogberg Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:50pm |
re: #253 Occasional Reader
I'd do it, if I could get a paper certificate. If nothing else, in 30 years it'll have souvenir value. Or, just maybe, it'll be worth millions! (Once the future, revitalized GM comes out with the Jetsons flying car that runs on "Mr. Fusion")
Lol! Yeah, that's what I was thinking too.
274![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:26:54pm |
re: #268 Shug
PS: was there a question asking if there was a swimming pool in the home?
Or a set of kitchen knives, or an automobile, or a shower, or a stove, or....
[you get the idea]
A well-meaning lib friend looked at me with something like panic when I mentioned I had bought a pistol. She seems quite concerned that the evil gun will jump up and shoot me of its own accord, any day now.
275![]() |
Harry Tuttle Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:27:10pm |
re: #265 Soona'
Lower, simpler taxes
Who said anything about taxes?
But fair enough, it should be specified. Limited government in my mind limits need to tax the society.
276![]() |
turn Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:27:19pm |
re: #230 eschew_obfuscation
I'm going to have to research that Laffer curve stuff another day, thanks.
Have a great weekend all, time to go walk the black lab along the American.
277![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:28:03pm |
re: #259 Charles
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christians groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
Another thing that turning the decision over to the states would do - It would deprive the left of a major fund raising issue for federal elections. NARAL rakes in big bucks sending out "action letters" to women in states that would never see an abortion ban. These letters raise big $ for Democrats.
And another thing - a constitutional amendment on abortion will never happen because the requisite number of states would not ratify it. But the socons don't think about that - it is all about moral victories rather than actual ones.
278![]() |
Caliredst8r Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:28:28pm |
re: #268 Shug
No question about a swimming pool, but there was one asking if the child knew how to swim.
279![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:30:53pm |
re: #264 Who Watches the Watchmen?
Prop 8 protests nationwide tomorrow
I thought the election was over. Get it on the ballot again, folks.
Nationwide protests over a California ballot initiative? I'm in Nevada, driving distance from the Calfornia border, and I don't see much excitement over it on this side.
280![]() |
gmsc Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:03pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Some of you will appreciate this:
Alternate title: Why I helped Barack 0bama get elected
281![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:04pm |
re: #264 Who Watches the Watchmen?
Prop 8 protests nationwide tomorrow
I thought the election was over. Get it on the ballot again, folks.
But that takes all sorts of boring political work! It's much more fun to make giant papier maché puppets, yell and scream, and maybe break stuff and threaten people.
282![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:22pm |
This debate will go on because I think we can all say, the Republican party is faced with a divide now.
Much like the Democrats in 2004, & 2006, they did their best to drive moderates out of the party, think Joe Lieberman.
Core beliefs are just what they indicate. Core. They transcend politics, elections, and winning. Asking someone to sign on, and disregard what they believe to be self evident truths in their own mind, is not a good solution.
I have made numerous arguments on these "hot button" issues, specifically void of the religious bend because I feel there is no way to divide fiscal socialism with social conservatism. Not a Litmus test.
I can see the logic in the argument of the socially liberal Republican, when certain issues pertaining to abortion should be allowed to suffice for rape, incest, and "life" of the mother. But lets face facts. Abortion in this country, by a vastly large percentage, is used as birth control. Some women have had abortions numbering 6-7-8, and more. As well, we also have some of the most readily available medical technology that can prevent someone from becoming pregnant if they wish not to.
As well, realize, this argument does not stop here. The next argument is federal funding. Whether you believe it or not, just as much as the Dobson's, or any other group who deals in special interest, the other side of that coin exists. They will demand federal funding. They already have, numerous times. The argument will not be satisfied with just letting go of your feelings on abortion.
Now consider, there are many, many people in this country who still think abortion is killing an unborn baby. Consider as well, by asking them to dismiss their core beliefs, a day will dawn on them when they are responsible for not only violating their core belief, but funding what they see as murder as well.
I acknowledge, it is not an easy argument. Where we go from here, I don't have the answer.
283![]() |
CLLRusso Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:36pm |
re: #229 akak
Looks like Gaby Ashkenazi got to much credit, he's heading into Halutz territory! Does he just want to keep his job or what?
At least Ashkenazi had the foresight in the Barak administration to beg him not to withdraw IDF forces from southern Lebanon. Don't know to what you are referring, but he's my hero for that effort.
284![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:33:44pm |
re: #233 doppelganglander
As an art lover, I worry about that a lot. If you removed every work with nudity or religious content from the Louvre, for example, all you'd have left are some butt-ugly modern works that look more like vandalism than art, and maybe a couple of still lifes. I am hoping to spend part of my retirement visiting the great cathedrals, palaces and museums of Europe, but I worry they may not be there in 20 or 30 years.
this is exactly what i'm talking abt. not only is there a push to censor contemporary art but many masterpieces will be covered or moved to back rooms and locked away. they won't be readily available for leisurely viewing.
what a wonderful retirement plan you have lined up. i'd say go as soon as you can. who knows what europe will be like in 20 or 30 yrs. and i'm not just speaking of art.
285![]() |
MandyManners Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:34:19pm |
re: #274 Occasional Reader
Or a set of kitchen knives, or an automobile, or a shower, or a stove, or....
[you get the idea]A well-meaning lib friend looked at me with something like panic when I mentioned I had bought a pistol. She seems quite concerned that the evil gun will jump up and shoot me of its own accord, any day now.
Oh, my goodness! Get rid of all electric outlets! Banish the toasters!
286![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:35:00pm |
re: #284 nyc redneck
this is exactly what i'm talking abt. not only is there a push to censor contemporary art but many masterpieces will be covered or moved to back rooms and locked away. they won't be readily available for leisurely viewing.
what a wonderful retirement plan you have lined up. i'd say go as soon as you can. who knows what europe will be like in 20 or 30 yrs. and i'm not just speaking of art.
That's all well and good but I demand little coverlets for those offensive table legs!
287![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:35:21pm |
re: #259 Charles
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christian groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
I think it's more about frustration over the fact that close to nothing has been done to try to overturn Roe vs. Wade. Liberal SCOTUS or not, there just hasn't been anyone that wants to impose on the court to change that decision. Maybe it's the only route they think they have. I don't agree with it, but I can understand.
288![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:35:27pm |
re: #255 FrogMarch
Faux-Cons!
Obama's gonna give me a tax cut!
289![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:36:13pm |
re: #232 caliredst8r
Took my daughter to the Doctor today, since we are new patients we had to fill out all the usual paperwork. One of the questions asked if there were firearms, loaded or unloaded, in the house. I left it blank. WTF kind of question is that for a Doctor ask, why does he need to know?
don't reveal that information.
he doesn't need to know.
290![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:36:23pm |
re: #272 joan
Steele is a very interesting guy. Definitely someone who could go far.
However, my dream GOP candidate for 2012: A black [yep, I said it] former military officer with a graduate degree in economics who runs a very successful business that he/she built from the ground up.
Where is he/she?
291![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:37:20pm |
re: #290 Occasional Reader
Is this person imaginary or real?
292![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:02pm |
re: #270 DaddyG
I have a unique take on the Gay Marriage issue...
We started down that slippery slope when we started to treat marital status as a category of tax exemption. Take the monetary benefit out of it and leave marriage to the Church where it belongs.
That being said I'd rather see partner benefits and civil unions vs. expanding the definition of marriage to cover whatever the morality de jour decides is kosher.
Aside from the ability to file taxes jointly, I can't think of anything a gay couple (or an unmarried straight couple) can't do by other legal means that a straight couple can do by marriage. Many major companies and state and local governments offer unmarried partner benefits. You can make anyone you want the beneficiary of your estate. You can give your partner power of attorney and authorize them to make medical decisions on your behalf. You can own property jointly. I think a civil union type of thing that encompasses all of that would be nice for one-stop shopping, but otherwise, gay couples can execute legal documents that give them many of the benefits of marriage. Maybe one of our illustrious lizard attorneys can correct me if I'm wrong here.
293![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:08pm |
re: #285 MandyManners
Oh, my goodness! Get rid of all electric outlets! Banish the toasters!
Especially those lethal high-capacity toasters! They have no legitimate purpose! I hereby designate them "assault toasters", and call for their immediate, nationwide banning.
294![]() |
saberry0530 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:24pm |
re: #285 MandyManners
Oh, my goodness! Get rid of all electric outlets! Banish the toasters!
Scientific study just concluded that shows living eventually causes death!
295![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:39:58pm |
re: #291 CalBear84
Is this person imaginary or real?
Possibly real. But, I don't know who he/she is yet. Let's put it that way, and be optimistic.
296![]() |
Hobbes Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:40:27pm |
re: #69 reine.de.tout
Oh, goodness.
My take on Jindal: He makes a better appearance at being a good public executive, than he does doing the actual job of being a public executive.
Don't get me wrong - we here in La. are much better off with Jindal than with Blanco, he has done much right.
But boy howdy - there have been some major screw-ups too, that should not have happened.
If you weren't in La. I'd think you were living in Illinois. Sounds like BHO except for "better off" and "has done much right" stuff.
297![]() |
Racer X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:40:33pm |
re: #290 Occasional Reader
Steele is a very interesting guy. Definitely someone who could go far.
However, my dream GOP candidate for 2012: A black [yep, I said it] former military officer with a graduate degree in economics who runs a very successful business that he/she built from the ground up.
Where is he/she?
Why not a person of hispanic decent?
298![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:40:52pm |
re: #259 Charles
Maybe one problem is that the leadership is out of step with the rank and file in the pro-life movement or with self-described "pro-lifers."
This certainly is the case among "pro-choicers," the vast majority of whom do NOT favor abortion-on-demand in the 3rd trimester or partial-birth abortion.
So what you end up with is two rigid, extreme positions adopted as platforms by the two major parties.
Pathetic.
(My personal view re abortion happens to be extreme, BTW, but I am foursquare in favor of having the laws decided by democratic means. This not only has the practical effect of the law more closely resembling the sentiment of the population at large......as opposed to what extremists on both sides want, but it allows me to have some imput. I can try to change hearts and minds. I can try to change popular sentiment by persuasion.)
300![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:41:47pm |
re: #282 formercorpsman
There are too many doomsdayers in the republican midsts right now. I offer a positive scenario that the Republicans are victims of their own success. GWB faced more big issues than any other president since FDR. I think he's steared the ship of state ok.
The Dems were succesful at being hysterical opposition, but they have no policies to govern by. All of Obama's campaign promises are populist ideas, but they are bat-shit stupid: Increase taxes for the productive, increase welfare and handouts for the unproductive, acquiese to your enemies. In all of history, those ideas have been tried over and over. Have they ever worked? No. Let the Dems govern for 4 years. Heck, they have already begun the mess with the damn Congress for the last 2 years. By the time 2012 comes, folks will be screaming for something better.
301![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:42:27pm |
re: #295 Occasional Reader
Sounds like a great idea for the main character of a book.
302![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:42:44pm |
re: #297 Racer X
Why not a person of hispanic decent?
Or that. Or both... black latino Republican! The moonbats would all spontaneously combust.
303![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:42:56pm |
re: #300 DeafDog
The Dems were succesful at being hysterical opposition,
So good that a sadly significant chunk of the eletorate thinks that the GOP controls congress: that the budgets and laws lately have been products of the GOP.
304![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:43:26pm |
re: #298 wolfie
. . .
(My personal view re abortion happens to be extreme, BTW, but I am foursquare in favor of having the laws decided by democratic means. This not only has the practical effect of the law more closely resembling the sentiment of the population at large......as opposed to what extremists on both sides want, but it allows me to have some imput. I can try to change hearts and minds. I can try to change popular sentiment by persuasion.)
By persuasion, by example, by being available to speak on the issues - lots of ways to try to change "popular" sentiment and help people make the right decisions.
306![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:43:57pm |
re: #289 nyc redneck
Risk assessment. Nothing more and nothing less.
307![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:44:27pm |
re: #303 Silhouette
Aggressive and willful stupidity, at your service.
308![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:44:45pm |
re: #288 CalBear84
Faux-Cons!
Obama's gonna give me a tax cut!
Our taxes are going to go up, but we will be gifted with a "stimulus check" from the democrats.
309![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:44:46pm |
310![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:45:24pm |
re: #304 reine.de.tout
By persuasion, by example, by being available to speak on the issues - lots of ways to try to change "popular" sentiment and help people make the right decisions.
One guy's mind was changed when he was scoffingly (word?) asking what he thought was a rhetorical question, "And if we don't have these abortions, whose going to take all these babies in adoption. You?" And half the hands in the room went up.
311![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:45:45pm |
re: #307 debutaunt
Aggressive and willful stupidity, at your service.
Isn't that simply a description of the world most days?
312![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:45:50pm |
re: #284 nyc redneck
this is exactly what i'm talking abt. not only is there a push to censor contemporary art but many masterpieces will be covered or moved to back rooms and locked away. they won't be readily available for leisurely viewing.
what a wonderful retirement plan you have lined up. i'd say go as soon as you can. who knows what europe will be like in 20 or 30 yrs. and i'm not just speaking of art.
I'd do it today if I could afford it. I've lived in Spain, where I saw some amazing works by Picasso; we couldn't afford to see the Prado on an E-3 salary, unfortunately. I've been to London twice and seen a ton of amazing works there. Right now I'm busy envying my daughter, who will be spending the spring semester in Florence. I may have to ship myself FedEx to tag along.
BTW, I'll be up your way for Thanksgiving week. First stop (besides Mom's house) is the Met and the Cloisters.
313![]() |
Biff Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:02pm |
re: #23 yochanan
wonder if we can go to alaska and start over ala ayn rand
This is an interesting point. Will Alaska become a conservative refuge state?
314![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:04pm |
re: #310 Silhouette
One guy's mind was changed when he was scoffingly (word?) asking what he thought was a rhetorical question, "And if we don't have these abortions, whose going to take all these babies in adoption. You?" And half the hands in the room went up.
heh. Lots and lots of people looking for a family.
315![]() |
debutaunt Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:42pm |
re: #311 Dianna
Isn't that simply a description of the world most days?
How is your depression coming along?
316![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:49pm |
re: #290 Occasional Reader
Nah, that black candidate thing is so yesterday.
Perhaps a Vietnamese dentist from Iowa?
An extra-terrestrial from New Mexico?
317![]() |
akak Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:50pm |
re: #283 CLLRusso
Refrain from Gaza op/ agreeing with the mayor.
You might want to start looking for a new hero.
318![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:46:59pm |
re: #308 FrogMarch
A rebate on my tax increase...how thoughtful of them.
319![]() |
BBev Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:47:20pm |
re: #289 nyc redneck
don't reveal that information.
he doesn't need to know.
I don't even give then my SS# it's none of there business and they never asked again.
320![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:47:34pm |
re: #306 Perplexed
Risk assessment. Nothing more and nothing less.
But a politically focused one.
Guns have a risk, but so too do many other things in the house that weren't on the questionaire. Things with much higher risks.
321![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:47:37pm |
re: #303 Silhouette
So good that a sadly significant chunk of the eletorate thinks that the GOP controls congress: that the budgets and laws lately have been products of the GOP.
They will keep blaming Bush for the next 4 years. I will not let them.
322![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:48:37pm |
re: #315 debutaunt
How is your depression coming along?
I've recovered my equanimity. Or at least as much as I've ever possessed; there are people who would tell you I don't actually have mental equilibrium (but they're wrong).
Of course, I'm corrosively cynical at the moment, but I hope to achieve amiable irony before the weekend is over.
323![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:48:46pm |
So I only punch myself when I take off the old spectacles?
I'm pretty safe until I go to sleep.
324![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:48:52pm |
re: #193 FrogMarch
Some of you will appreciate this:
I agree with almost every word of that op-ed. Speaking for myself, I still voted for the GOP this year because the alternative seemed worse. But this might be the last time for me if the GOP gets even deeper into the far-right religious agenda.
The writer is absolutely correct that separation of church and state is a core conservative value. But far too many conservatives seem to have drunk the Dobson Koolaid.
325![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:16pm |
re: #314 reine.de.tout
heh. Lots and lots of people looking for a family.
Mr. Silhouette promised me that if we win the lottery, we can adopt. Other folks dream of sports cars and mansions.
326![]() |
CalBear84 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:17pm |
re: #316 wolfie
Here's one they would never see coming:
A half-white, half-black muslim Hawaiian with...errr...nevermind
327![]() |
CommonCents Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:23pm |
re: #48 reine.de.tout
I read the comments on that article about the DISD. It seemed to me that Texas was about to have another revolution for independence from Mexico.
328![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:34pm |
329![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:40pm |
re: #197 Charles
I've always though that Roe should be repealed precisely to give the issue of abortion back to state legislatures. Here in New York, the legislature legalized abortion before Roe, so nothing would change.
Pro-life activists could then take the issue to their state legislatures, and a majority of the electorate in each state could determine public policy. I think public opinion on abortion has shifted left since Roe, so I wouldn't foresee radical changes except in states with a large Roman Catholic population such as Pennsylvania or Louisiana.
Empowering the federal government on domestic issues is the liberal agenda. We should be moving power from the feds to the states and the people.
330![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:49:49pm |
re: #309 nyc redneck
i wouldn't give it out.
Yep. Some of those questions are a NOYFB and I put in BS answers.
Seen the questionnaire for getting a job with the ONE? Lots of questions that are illegal to ask of any prospective employee.
331![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:00pm |
re: #312 doppelganglander
i think i'll be in town that wk end.
newsjunkie_ky is coming to town around that time.
if possible we could get together.
332![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:12pm |
re: #316 wolfie
An extra-terrestrial from New Mexico?
The ET barrier was already broken, at least in Congress.
333![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:20pm |
re: #322 Dianna
I've recovered my equanimity. Or at least as much as I've ever possessed; there are people who would tell you I don't actually have mental equilibrium (but they're wrong).
Of course, I'm corrosively cynical at the moment, but I hope to achieve amiable irony before the weekend is over.
would you like to borrow my old tee shirt that says "Normal is Boring" and has a drawing of an upside-down stick figure?
335![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:50:57pm |
re: #280 gmsc
A soft-headed physician who doesn't understand that McCain health care plan would have helped him immensely as a physician. In other words, an idiot.
336![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:03pm |
re: #319 BBev
I don't even give then my SS# it's none of there business and they never asked again.
that's the way i'd do it.
why do we want people knowing that info?
337![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:08pm |
re: #329 quickjustice
We need to get the feds out of state governments and to let the states run their own state pretty much they want to run them.
338![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:24pm |
re: #328 Dianna
Power tools, for instance!
Particularly when used by left-handed people.
Left-handedness in general.
339![]() |
Clutch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:35pm |
Dang, glad this week is over. Company whacked almost 5% of the workforce worldwide, but fortunately (?) only two of our team took it in the neck. Neither one of them deserved it.
So, screw it, going to eat and then to the movies with the family to watch something silly like the new Madagascar movie. Gotta love penguins that fix a warning light by whacking it with the flight manual...
340![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:44pm |
re: #337 Perplexed
We need to get the feds out of state governments and to let the states run their own state pretty much they want to run them.
Granholm or Obama-----SSDD
341![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:51:51pm |
re: #300 DeafDog
I will digress for a moment. I think if we are to honestly assess what turned this election the way it did, was not any of the arguments here.
In 1992, Bill Clinton had one thing right. "It is the economy stupid"
What did this election in, was the 50 year old crowd, who opened their 401K statement, and watched their earnings begin to evaporate. It was a stock market in free fall, people defaulting on their mortgages, and the Republicans were in power, so they are left holding the ball. That is just they way it goes. After that, I blame the media, because they were criminal in their negligence, and guilty of trying to make an election over the voters in this country.
Third, the Republicans deserve much of the blame, because they did not govern the way they promised to, once they were elected. When this population can be convinced that Obama is the more fiscally responsible of the candidates, we have major problems.
As well, McCain was a victim of his own legislation.
There is no easy fix.
342![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:03pm |
re: #333 Eowyn2
would you like to borrow my old tee shirt that says "Normal is Boring" and has a drawing of an upside-down stick figure?
I have that same t!
Somewhere, there's a bumper-sticker I never got around to attaching to anything that reads, "Normal people worry me."
344![]() |
WhiteRasta Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:14pm |
re: #330 Perplexed
The city of Halifax Nova Scotia was in trouble recently for asking prospective employees if they practice bestiality and/or incest.....
345![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:16pm |
re: #330 Perplexed
I've answered, "Why would you even ask this? Aren't you ashamed that this matters to you?"
346![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:29pm |
re: #9 sadhu
STS 126 launch is at 6:55pm EST
[Link: ping.fm...]
Thank you for this link. I've been watching it for over an hour.
Some of the best TV ever. So informative about what goes into a shuttle launch
347![]() |
eschew_obfuscation Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:52:46pm |
re: #337 Perplexed
We need to get the feds out of state governments and to let the states run their own state pretty much they want to run them.
I'd like that as long as the states don't show up on the steps of the Capitol wanting a handout when their little experiments go south.
348![]() |
Charles Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:05pm |
re: #335 quickjustice
A soft-headed physician who doesn't understand that McCain health care plan would have helped him immensely as a physician. In other words, an idiot.
He's not an idiot. He's deeply disturbed at the anti-freedom agenda of the religious right, and I agree with him on that.
349![]() |
Spare O'Lake Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:09pm |
re: #259 Charles
The Republican Party platform, which was heavily influenced by the far-right Christian groups, specifically calls for a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions, with no exceptions. I don't think it's unjustified to say that prevailing socon opinion is against turning this decision over to the states.
As a Canadian observer, may I say that the concept of having different abortion laws in each State seems to me to be a cop-out by the GOP?
Sure, it would wrest the issue away from the religious right wing of the party, but to what effect and for how long?
If the right to abortion on demand is to be as accessible as at most crossing a State line or two, then how can that possibly be acceptable to the religious right?
It seems to me that something as basic as abortion should be regulated, if at all, by universal Federal legislation.
Of course in Canada our Constitutional division of powers places the criminal law firmly in the Federal column, so maybe Americans have a different take on this.
350![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:27pm |
re: #338 Silhouette
You've clearly read some of the same statistics I have. It's a positive threat to one's longevity.
I figured out that one of the main problems is that lefties inevitably dodge the wrong way.
351![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:53pm |
re: #324 Charles
The GOP is in sorry shape. You end up with "bad" and "worse" decisions in the voting booth. I voted for McCain despite an inept campaign brightened only by Palin's presence. She was real.
352![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:53:58pm |
re: #322 Dianna
You DID see my small happy dance upthread for finally having actual possession of my Kimber, right?
You can happy with me, vicariously.
353![]() |
AceR Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:05pm |
Oops...posted this on a dying thread, so I am reposting it here. It's about my thoughts on Obama's relationship with Ayers, and others.
I may not be as "educated" as Ayers or Obama (high school diploma in 1969), but this much I know.
I have no "friends of the family", no "neighborhood acquaintances", no "pastor" and no "business relationships" with anyone who hates the people of this country as much as Ayers, Rezco, Khalidi, and Wright do.
My father (blue collar, sheet metal worker) told me when I was growing up that above all else, I will be judged by the people I associate with. It doesn't matter whether you agree with them or not. If you hang out with them, do business with them, visit them, and seek friendships with them, you will be perceived as being just like them.
Thankfully, I heeded my father's advice, and for the bulk of my career, I received security clearances based on numerous background investigations that occured every 5 years. And throughout my life, my common sense antenna has caused me to steer clear of a lot of bad "acquaintances" who register a 10 on the weird sh*t-o-meter scale. I wonder why Obama was drawn to those who register a 10?
Obama's associations with these thugs, cons, terrorists and racial bigots, would preclude him from ever obtaining a security clearance, because in the world of security clearances, your associations, acquaintances, friends---and even your pastor---matters. It also matters that he did "a little blow", but heh, he doesn't have to worry about getting any stupid old security clearances now, does he?
So now America will be led by a President who in the real world could never aspire to any position of employment that required even the most basic background investigation for security purposes. Doesn't leave me with a warm and fuzzy feeling. How about you?
Obama is con. He is disingenuous and it speaks to his lack of integrity. He doesn't want to have an honest dialogue with the American people about how he really feels about social justice, race, spreading the wealth, affirmative action, and the like, because if he tips his hand prematurely, he might not get the support he needs to ramrod his social programs through Congress in the next 4 years.
And so we must rely on Obama's sketchy resume, his friends and acquaintances and the business partners he surrounded himself with throughout his adult years, to try to get a picture of this man.
Yes, I have a picture of Obama and Michelle sitting in the Ayer's living room sipping a mocha latte after dinner, while they discuss the sad state of America and what should be done to fix it. Then later chatting over an aperitif about Tony Rezco and his fabulous business deals, Jeremiah Wright and his enthusiastic method of preaching the Gospel, and how Khalidi has so many interesting "friends" in the middle east.
Makes me sick.
354![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:27pm |
re: #350 Dianna
I figured out that one of the main problems is that lefties inevitably dodge the wrong way.
We say it all the time, but that one made me laugh out loud.
355![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:47pm |
re: #335 quickjustice
A soft-headed physician who doesn't understand that McCain health care plan would have helped him immensely as a physician. In other words, an idiot.
a physician ought to know a dead on arrival patient when he sees one.
McCain's healthcare plan would have been DOA to Pelosi's desk
356![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:54:57pm |
re: #346 Shug
Thank you for this link. I've been watching it for over an hour.
Some of the best TV ever. So informative about what goes into a shuttle launch
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
357![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:55:32pm |
I agree with the sentiment on this thread that it was counterproductive for Conservatives to sit out this election.
I was very disappointed that McCain got the nomination, but I put out a yard sign, voted for him & encouraged others to vote for him.
I will say though that McCain brought a lot of this on himself. He repeatedly knifed Republicans & ran a ridiculous campaign.
He refused to use the Wright issue & at one rally sounded like he was endorsing Obama.
As I see it the lesson is vote a real Republican next time. He or she does not have to be far right , but at least should you know, favor Republicans.
358![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:55:44pm |
re: #325 Silhouette
Mr. Silhouette promised me that if we win the lottery, we can adopt. Other folks dream of sports cars and mansions.
GOOD FOR YOU!
But why wait for the lottery? I guess adoption costs an arm and a leg.
Contact Catholic Charities in your area.
359![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:55:44pm |
re: #329 quickjustice
I agree.
Actually, the younger generation is decidedly less pro-abortion than the baby-boomer generation. But I can't see any state outlawing all abortions today, and most would be pretty liberal about 1st trimester ones.
360![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:07pm |
re: #344 WhiteRasta
The city of Halifax Nova Scotia was in trouble recently for asking prospective employees if they practice bestiality and/or incest.....
Must have been a quiet day for the person who generated the form - at least until one made its way to the local paper.
361![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:08pm |
re: #324 Charles
IMO, the social issues are a side-show to economic and foreign policy issues. That said, I agree that some of the hard-line polices on both sides are a turn-off. I hope the republican leader(s) who emerge moderate their stances on those policies. On the other hand, the in-your-face gay rights folks (and I relate them with the dems) are at least as offensive as the far right soc-cons.
362![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:10pm |
re: #352 Occasional Reader
You DID see my small happy dance upthread for finally having actual possession of my Kimber, right?
You can happy with me, vicariously.
I didn't, but I am not happy dancing for you!
Congratulations! Isn't it just the sweetest shooting handgun you've ever tried?
363![]() |
wolfie Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:56:39pm |
re: #332 Occasional Reader
Dang! :D
The Vietnamese dentist it is, then!
364![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:57:09pm |
365![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:57:28pm |
re: #356 Fat Jolly Penguin
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
I saw STS-123 launch at night from the NASA causeway.
The coolest thing I've ever seen.
366![]() |
Occasional Reader Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:57:30pm |
re: #362 Dianna
I didn't, but I am not happy dancing for you!
Congratulations! Isn't it just the sweetest shooting handgun you've ever tried?
Well, I haven't shot it yet. I'll let you know after this weekend.
367![]() |
Racer X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:58:26pm |
re: #356 Fat Jolly Penguin
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
6:55 pm EST right?
368![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:58:48pm |
re: #348 Charles
Fair enough, but the doctor has an organization advocating for more medical autonomy. I'm more into the health care issues, and McCain's health plan would have given consumers far more control over their health care, and doctors far better control over patient care, than Obama's.
My point is that on the health care issue, he voted against his own interests, and those of his patients. And that's just sad.
369![]() |
Jack Reacher Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:13pm |
re: #302 Occasional Reader
Or that. Or both... black latino Republican! The moonbats would all spontaneously combust.
With a cabinet including "A black, a woman, two Jews and a cripple." Ah, James Watt; owner of an unregistered assault-mouth.
370![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:24pm |
re: #355 Shug
a physician ought to know a dead on arrival patient when he sees one.
McCain's healthcare plan would have been DOA to Pelosi's desk
Anything McCain would have proposed would have been DOA on Pelosi's desk. We lack people in government who put the country before politics.
371![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:37pm |
re: #356 Fat Jolly Penguin
Just over two hours until launch; looking like another night launch. Those are awesome.
I've seen three, and they are truly awe inspiring.
The first time, I was driving down 95 and didn't know about the launch. After we figured out what it was, we pulled on the side of the road with dozens of others and watched it climb under you could see it turn into a glowing dot of a satellite and move across the stars.
Given that one usually feels tiny and insignificant looking at the sky, it was a powerful moment, knowing that, tiny as we are, just little 5-6 ft squishy breakable things, yet we can touch the heavens.
373![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 2:59:51pm |
374![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:05pm |
re: #362 Dianna
Er, I think I meant that I am now happy dancing for OR, and his new possession.
375![]() |
Spare O'Lake Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:35pm |
re: #322 Dianna
I've recovered my equanimity. Or at least as much as I've ever possessed; there are people who would tell you I don't actually have mental equilibrium (but they're wrong).
Of course, I'm corrosively cynical at the moment, but I hope to achieve amiable irony before the weekend is over.
LOL. Take it from me, corrosive cynicism is OK - just keep a vat of antacid beside the computer.
376![]() |
DeafDog Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:49pm |
re: #341 formercorpsman
I totally agree. Upding!
The 2008 election turned on the financial meltdown and McCain's lack of glibness on the subject. The stunt McCain pulled before the first debate back-fired when he supported the $700B bailout. I said before that the republican primary hardly vetted the candidates on economics. That was our fault.
377![]() |
Dianna Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:00:54pm |
re: #366 Occasional Reader
Well, I haven't shot it yet. I'll let you know after this weekend.
It's such a treat! Have fun.
378![]() |
doppelganglander Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:01:07pm |
re: #331 nyc redneck
i think i'll be in town that wk end.
newsjunkie_ky is coming to town around that time.
if possible we could get together.
My schedule is horrendous (too many relatives, not enough time), but please email me. Met day is Sunday the 23rd; maybe coffee?
379![]() |
Racer X Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:01:26pm |
381![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:01:52pm |
re: #233 doppelganglander
As an art lover, I worry about that a lot. If you removed every work with nudity or religious content from the Louvre, for example, all you'd have left are some butt-ugly modern works that look more like vandalism than art, and maybe a couple of still lifes. I am hoping to spend part of my retirement visiting the great cathedrals, palaces and museums of Europe, but I worry they may not be there in 20 or 30 years.
Venus in a Burka
David in a loin cloth
382![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:02:02pm |
383![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:02:25pm |
i'm working on my christmas cards now. they're so cute.
i love doing art. i'm using colored pencils and crayons.
and i feel 8yrs. old.
tho, these are pretty sophisticated potato prints.
384![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:02:39pm |
re: #364 formercorpsman
I voted straight R.
I can't say I was enthusiastic, but I did my duty.
I did too, but like you, not all that enthusiastic.
First I wanted Rudy, but he screwed up, then Romney , but the open state primaries killed him.
So we get McCain. The alternative though was too heinous.
385![]() |
Soona' Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:07pm |
re: #365 Shug
I saw STS-123 launch at night from the NASA causeway.
The coolest thing I've ever seen.
Do they have observation points close enough to really feel the noise?
386![]() |
Eowyn2 Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:11pm |
damn,
I almost got to be here long enough to read 20 posts.
back to work
387![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:42pm |
re: #384 opnion
I wanted Thompson but his campaign was really lack-luster.
388![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:49pm |
re: #368 quickjustice
Yes because the issues of liberty in another arena outweighed those in his mind.
389![]() |
FrogMarch Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:03:50pm |
re: #318 CalBear84
A rebate on my tax increase...how thoughtful of them.
It's a gift. Like if the dems stop blowing smoke in our face, it's the gift of fresh air.
390![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:25pm |
re: #376 DeafDog
Bingo.
I don't know anyone on any side of the political coin who liked the idea of the bailout.
I'm not saying something should not have been done, but they were going to own it no matter what.
391![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:39pm |
re: #349 Spare O'Lake
Of course in Canada our Constitutional division of powers places the criminal law firmly in the Federal column, so maybe Americans have a different take on this.
We do.
The US Constitution, when it was ratified, was a contract between sovereign states. A Virginian saw himself as a Virginian, as is evident from Thomas Jefferson's gravestone inscription.
For a variety of reasons (many technological in terms of transportation, communications and media) we have become a largely homogeneous place. That is, frankly, unfortunate. In that adoption of cultural homogeneity we have also allowed ourselves to get lulled into a false comfort of "federal assistance" which basically offers money to states for projects and programs in exchange for conforming to federal rules. It is a false exchange - the Federal Government has, over the course of time, simply taken a bigger chunk of the tax payments households make and then uses that increment to "give" to the states with strings. States have since learned to do the same to local governments.
The result of this "incentive system" is that we as individual Americans have far less influence on our laws and regulation - the power rests in Washington.
We are less free for it.
And our criminal laws mostly reside with the states.
392![]() |
opnion Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:47pm |
re: #387 Perplexed
I wanted Thompson but his campaign was really lack-luster.
He just seemed tired. But Ron Paul! Oh never mind.
393![]() |
Silhouette Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:04:48pm |
One night launch was at 1am, on a work night. But Mr. Silhouette and I were young, no kids, so we did the foolish thing and drove over from Tampa to see it.
I think I got to bed at 4am. Did I mention that work started at 7am?
394![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:05:12pm |
And on a lighter note:
[Link: www.theonion.com...]
395![]() |
Fat Jolly Penguin Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:05:36pm |
Speaking of space stuff, just found this on NASA's site: Hubble directly observes planet orbiting Fomalhaut
Estimated to be no more than three times Jupiter's mass, the planet, called Fomalhaut b, orbits the bright southern star Fomalhaut, located 25 light-years away in the constellation Piscis Australis, or the "Southern Fish."
Fomalhaut has been a candidate for planet hunting ever since an excess of dust was discovered around the star in the early 1980s by NASA's Infrared Astronomy Satellite, IRAS.
396![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:06:33pm |
re: #395 Fat Jolly Penguin
I saw Hubbel launched. I was driving in the morning commute in Orlando when it went up. Beautiful.
397![]() |
albusteve Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:06:53pm |
re: #352 Occasional Reader
You DID see my small happy dance upthread for finally having actual possession of my Kimber, right?
You can happy with me, vicariously.
me too?...and a bit envious as well
398![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:07:16pm |
re: #384 opnion
Now here is the kicker.
I am pro-life.
Killgore pretty much convinced me with his discussions, to vote for Guiliani.
I made my mind up. I was going to vote for him. I live in PA. By the time the primary came to us, it did not matter.
Where the hell does that put me?
399![]() |
Alberta Oil Peon Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:07:39pm |
re: #197 Charles
The reason why social conservatives and the Dobson/Perkins crowd are opposed to letting states decide on abortion is simple -- because women would then be able to get abortions, by going to a state where they were allowed. This is intolerable to the socons, who want to ban abortion altogether, with no exceptions.
And a national ban on abortions would simply force those women who wanted one to go across a border. Would they start demanding pregnancy tests of all women of childbearing age who wish to board a flight out of the country?
Abortion, ultimately, is a self-limiting problem. The class of people who accept abortion as legitimate, will for the most part, be those who choose to have abortions. That means they, as a group, will tend to have fewer offspring to indoctrinate with the pro-choice mindset.
IMHO, the worst thing about abortion is that it is wasteful. Wasteful of medical resources to solve a "problem" that a two-bit piece of rubber could have prevented; and worse, wasteful of human potential.
The socons are shooting themselves in the foot by belaboring this issue.
400![]() |
Miss Molly Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:07:39pm |
Protesters of prop 8 need to protest against the people who voted in favor of prop 8. 74% of those voting in favor of prop 8 voted for Obama.
401![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:08:01pm |
re: #393 Silhouette
One night launch was at 1am, on a work night. But Mr. Silhouette and I were young, no kids, so we did the foolish thing and drove over from Tampa to see it.
I think I got to bed at 4am. Did I mention that work started at 7am?
I've never seen a launch. But one of the returns came directly overhead our area, and we were able to clearly see the thing coming in. A very few minutes after it passed over us in La., it was landing in Fla. It was amazing, it was streaking across the sky.
402![]() |
Thanos Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:08:32pm |
The thing that saddens me about this is that I know many religious conservatives who support pro-life positions -- when you get them away from the congregation and ask them quietly one on one they don't want to outlaw it completely however. It's a strange stance -- they would never consider an abortion, they support prolife candidates, but.... they want the option there.
The rabid ideologues at both ends of the spectrum shout down any voice of moderation in the Christian right however.
On Gay marriage most are horrified when I tell them they agree with Fred Phelps, just not the way he says it....
403![]() |
Shug Fri, Nov 14, 2008 3:08:41pm |
|
