LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

Threats Against Obama Set Disturbing Records

US News | Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:10:07 am PST

With the extreme polarization of this last election, this comes as no surprise: Obama has more threats than other presidents-elect.

WASHINGTON – Threats against a new president historically spike right after an election, but from Maine to Idaho law enforcement officials are seeing more against Barack Obama than ever before. The Secret Service would not comment or provide the number of cases they are investigating. But since the Nov. 4 election, law enforcement officials have seen more potentially threatening writings, Internet postings and other activity directed at Obama than has been seen with any past president-elect, said officials aware of the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity because the issue of a president’s security is so sensitive.

Advertisement

546 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:12:13am
It’s no excuse, but it should be pointed out that the media simply don’t report the hatred coming from the left; violent imagery and extreme hatred like this.

But, but, but... that's just freedom of speech.
/

2 UberInfidel67  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:12:14am

I call BS. So now he is gonna play the victim card? Blah.

3 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:12:21am

One of the defendants in the case in Tennessee has asked for the indictment to be dismissed because only two people on the grand jury were white.

4 Shug  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:13:17am

We should all pray for his safety. We should pray for the brave men and women of the Secret Service who risk their lives to keep him and his family safe.
We should disagree with his policy, but respect the office he holds. We should root for America, unlike the Loony left.

If any crazy person harms him, I dread what would happen in this country.
Race relations would be broken and I fear not repaired in our lifetime.

5 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:13:28am

The Left and MSM polarized things so much as to make me wonder if they explicitly wanted a climate where repression becomes the norm.

6 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:13:57am
law enforcement officials have seen more potentially threatening writings, Internet postings and other activity directed at Obama than has been seen with any past president-elect,

This is why we don't behave like koslings, folks.

7 freedombilly  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:14:20am

May the Secret Service have success protecting everyone. Even the idiots.

8 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:15:32am

Amazing how the threats against Bush were accepted as being normal by so many people.

9 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:16:03am

re: #6 Sharmuta

This is why we don't behave like koslings, folks.

Right. Yet we seem to have an occasional Lizard, even long term Lizards who don't seem to think that violent statements are in any way out of line here.

10 DocDale  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:16:38am

Several betting outlets of which I am aware are also delaying payouts on the election result until Obama is inaugurated, on the grounds that he may be assassinated. This is the first time I've encountered it (to be fair I'm only the lawyer sending a letter of demand in this thing), although I've discovered that there have been similar delays with one or two other presidents, including Bush in 2000.

Most unpleasant.

11 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:16:42am

I'd call BS
BUT
the KKK wanted him elected
so they could recruit more

then again, they are a tiny fraction of Americana

and the Huffpo, DKos, Dunderground crowd is WAY MORE numerous and violent

add in veterans for peace, code pink, academia, etc....
and you have some seriously disturbed people to look out for no matter your persuasion

12 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:16:44am

The Secret Service would not comment or provide the number of cases they are investigating.

I think this is the wrong way to go. I think they should publicize each and every instance to show how vigilant they are, how even 2 whack-jobs plotting amongst themselves will be caught, tried, convicted and punished. It won't stop every othre whack job from trying, but I'll bet it will make many re-think it.

13 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:16:46am

That is some disturbing stuff. 2000 new stormfront members? Sad and scary.

14 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:16:57am

re: #3 MandyManners

A Crockett County man charged with plotting to kill President-elect Barack Obama in a crime spree wants to have his indictment dismissed because the federal grand jury did not contain enough white members.

SNIP

Cowart's attorney, Joe H. Byrd Jr., filed a petition Thursday arguing that since the 23-member grand jury that indicted Cowart had just two white members, it could not have been fair and impartial. The remaining 21 members were African American or were "of another race or races," the petition states.

In the 13-page motion and an additional 13-page memorandum, Byrd asks that the indictment be dismissed, that the court conduct an in-camera review of the grand jury testimony to determine the potential partiality or prejudice of the jurors and that the court designate an independent commissioner to interview the 23 jurors to see if individual jurors were partial or prejudiced.

SNIP

15 reine.de.tout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:17:30am

I wonder how many of these will end up being the product of someone wanting to "create a reaction", like this guy.

16 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:17:43am

re: #9 Walter L. Newton

Right. Yet we seem to have an occasional Lizard, even long term Lizards who don't seem to think that violent statements are in any way out of line here.

Occasional is the operative word here, unlike a lot of Leftoid sites where violence is the norm.

17 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:17:45am

Not to diminish the serious of the subject, but I wonder if Joe the Plumber asking a tough question is categorized as a "threat?

18 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:18:08am

Not to mention the LLL's attempts to make "citizen's arrests" of Bush and others. Could you imagine if someone tried that on Obama?

19 ctrlL  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:18:20am

The campaign and election have set what used to be called 'race relations' back 40 years. It's all about the attitude, imo.

The threats, tho, are more about policy than skin color (again, imho).

20 Mike in Georgia  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:18:23am

Well Jessie did want to cut his nuts off.

21 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:18:52am

re: #2 UberInfidel67

I call BS. So now he is gonna play the victim card? Blah.

Not that it means beans but I can and do attest, through a close source, that the story is being accurately reported.

22 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:19:23am

re: #17 jcm

Not to diminish the serious of the subject, but I wonder if Joe the Plumber asking a tough question is categorized as a "threat?

By the media reaction and the governmental proctology exam the man underwent I would have to say, "well, DUH!"

23 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:19:34am

Safety for our leaders is a major priority in my book.

Would someone "waterboard" a suspect who was in an attack on the President Elect? I would.

24 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:19:42am

re: #5 FurryOldGuyJeans

The Left and MSM polarized things so much as to make me wonder if they explicitly wanted a climate where repression becomes the norm.

It would play to their advantage. The left has been saying that the right has use the WOT as a device to keep us in a perpetual war (ala Eastasia versus Eurasia, 1984), yet the left has used manufactured racism, fear of global/big business and fear of separate social classes as a wedge to drive their agendas.

25 newsjunkie_ky  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:03am

Don't recall the msm running stories about the Bush assassination books and movies.

26 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:04am
One of the most popular white supremacist Web sites got more than 2,000 new members the day after the election, compared with 91 new members on Election Day, according to an AP count. The site, stormfront.org, was temporarily off-line Nov. 5 because of the overwhelming amount of activity it received after Election Day. On Saturday, one Stormfront poster, identified as Dalderian Germanicus, of North Las Vegas, said, "I want the SOB laid out in a box to see how 'messiahs' come to rest. God has abandoned us, this country is doomed."

And these guys are huge fans of vlaams belang.

27 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:17am

re: #19 ctrlL

The threats, tho, are more about policy than skin color

Those worried about policy would tend to be more rational. The racists are more dangerous because they're prone to extreme action.

28 itellu3times  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:21am

But how many threats against Obama are coming from the left?

As in the French Revolution, The Terror comes from the left, even against the left. Bill Ayers is probably on the watch list again and tickled pink about it, so to speak.

29 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:23am

re: #23 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Safety for our leaders is a major priority in my book.

Would someone "waterboard" a suspect who was in an attack on the President Elect? I would.

I'd skip the water and just whack him over the head with the board!

30 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:23am

Anyone supporting conservative principles - "right-wing" principles, should recognize that at this point, we need Obama like we need a vaccination. The left can now demonstrate to all Americans what they can do to a bowling ball. If harm comes to him - THE LEFT GETS A BLANK CHECK! I made that large so the loons can see it. I think Obama is in much greater danger from the extreme left rather than really stupid "right-wingers."

31 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:23am

This story is absolutely NOT BS.

32 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:20:43am

re: #23 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Safety for our leaders is a major priority in my book.

Would someone "waterboard" a suspect who was in an attack on the President Elect? I would.

I'd go straight to finger nails, I wouldn't ask politely with a little water in the face.....
//

33 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:21:13am

re: #24 Walter L. Newton

It would play to their advantage. The left has been saying that the right has use the WOT as a device to keep us in a perpetual war (ala Eastasia versus Eurasia, 1984), yet the left has used manufactured racism, fear of global/big business and fear of separate social classes as a wedge to drive their agendas.

I know it would play to their advantage, hence the reason I think it is deliberate on the part of at least some power brokers.

34 eaglewingz08  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:21:16am

I don't excuse those inflammatory postings and if there is a real threat these unhinged individuals should be appropriately prosecuted. However, we have never had a president elect who palled around with the most anti american scum of society and with unrepentent terrorists. Had the traitorous and treachorous Jean Fraude Carrie become president elect I believe a similar amount vituperation would have accompanied his election
but it may also be that that for some unstable individuals, Obama's virulent liberalism/socialism combined with Obama's racial profile is too much for them to bear. Again no excuse for any threats or attempts at violence against Obama, that would be heinous.

35 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:21:43am

re: #26 Sharmuta

LGF2 posted a thread the other day hoping Obama would be assassinated before the inauguration.

36 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:18am

re: #35 Killgore Trout

LGF2 posted a thread the other day hoping Obama would be assassinated before the inauguration.

GGGAAAHHHH ,,,, from a former poster here ?

37 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:26am

re: #35 Killgore Trout

WHAT?

38 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:30am

re: #35 Killgore Trout

Nice friends robert has.

39 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:31am

re: #35 Killgore Trout

LGF2 posted a thread the other day hoping Obama would be assassinated before the inauguration.

LGF2 ? ? ?

40 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:33am

re: #36 sattv4u2

yup.

41 Ayatollah Ghilmeini  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:40am

I have no love for Obama but he is the President-elect of this country. Anyone making threats against him and even more so threats against his family, put them right up to the wall and shoot them.

Barack Obama is a tax. He is the stupidity tax that we will have to pay for not being a wiser nation. We let this cad lie his way into office and it is our own faults. The principles this nation stands for requires us to be willing to lay down our very lives to protect him. Having said I would do so unhappily for even Carter, so I would for Obama. To do less is to not love this country the way you should. How can you ask Americans to respect our government if we are not each willing to do this? How can you ask people who you do not agree with to accept when your side wins if you cannot abide when your side loses?

This is Edmund Burke/John Wayne 101 and we should not tolerate anyone making threats against any first family member past or present.

42 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:45am

re: #26 Sharmuta

And these guys are huge fans of vlaams belang.

It's ok. According to Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch...

"Actually, I am fighting jihad, and have no interest in or intention to investigate these groups. Insofar as they are fighting jihad, I applaud them. Insofar as they are doing anything else, my endorsement is not implied." Email from Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch sent Sat 11/8/2008 10:39 AM.

43 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:46am

re: #25 newsjunkie_ky

Don't recall the msm running stories about the Bush assassination books and movies.

When they did there was no condemnation of such stuff. It was treated as being the only correct and proper way to act and react.

44 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:50am

re: #39 Adrenalyn

It's a stalker site.

45 reine.de.tout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:22:52am

re: #21 aboo-Hoo-Hoo

Not that it means beans but I can and do attest, through a close source, that the story is being accurately reported.

I have no doubt that this is accurate. Whether I agree with Obama or not, the safety and security of the elected leaders of our country is of utmost importance, and these threats should be prosecuted fully.

46 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:23:02am

re: #35 Killgore Trout

LGF2 posted a thread the other day hoping Obama would be assassinated before the inauguration.

Isn't Spenser now one of their buddies?

47 freedombilly  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:23:20am

re: #39 Adrenalyn

LGF2 ? ? ?

Check it out when you have a moment and want a really good chuckle.

48 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:23:26am

re: #42 Walter L. Newton

I'm going to ding you every time you post that.

49 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:23:27am

re: #40 Killgore Trout

yup.

Geez Louise. He/She should have his/her internet privilage taken away for life

50 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:23:44am

re: #33 FurryOldGuyJeans

I know it would play to their advantage, hence the reason I think it is deliberate on the part of at least some power brokers.

And I was backing up your point. Agreed.

51 Shug  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:23:51am

I think saying " but but but the MSM ignored the threats against Bush" is the wrong way to go here.

We are better than they are. We ought to have higher standards. We are not the scum of the left

Threats against any American president are wrong. Democrat, republican, white , blackm man, woman. Wrong is wrong.
Consistency give us credibility

52 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:23:58am

re: #9 Walter L. Newton

Right. Yet we seem to have an occasional Lizard, even long term Lizards who don't seem to think that violent statements are in any way out of line here.

And by the way, just to make something very clear, anyone who even hints at supporting or enabling this kind of behavior is going to lose their LGF account. You may think you're anonymous here, but if I get a call from the Secret Service about a comment posted at LGF (which I have not, to date) I will absolutely cooperate with them fully and give them everything they need to get in touch with you. And I won't even think twice about it.

53 eaglewingz08  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:00am

Mike raises an interesting point, did any secret service visit Jesse Jackson after those comments?

54 SpaceJesus  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:01am

people posting retarded things they'll never do on the internet? oh no

55 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:06am

I'm not buying it. These people think Obama is sooooo special, so it's like the story of the princess and the pea. Now, to be sure, anyone who does threaten Obama is a moron, but I just have my doubts about the hype.

56 debutaunt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:10am

re: #25 newsjunkie_ky

Don't recall the msm running stories about the Bush assassination books and movies.

Damn - we don't have cog to kick around anymore.

57 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:22am

re: #3 MandyManners

One of the defendants in the case in Tennessee has asked for the indictment to be dismissed because only two people on the grand jury were white.

The difference between a member of the Weather Underground and a Neonazi is the haircut. They are both anti-human trash with delusions of superior being status.

58 FrogMarch  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:24am

yep. & how many unhinged leftists have threatened W?

I suspect just as many if not more. But - None of those threats were ever reproted by our biased hack media.

59 neocon hippie  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:26am

It's not hard to imagine that some lefty types would welcome an Obama assassination. The chaos it would bring, a la the Cloward-Piven strategy, could be just the ticket to vault a new regime, possibly involving the UN or other foreign powers, into power. Maybe the plan all along was for Obama to be a martyr. I know this is tin-foil hat material, and not likely, but I wouldn't put it completely out of the realm of possibility.

60 freedombilly  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:24:39am

re: #52 Charles

And by the way, just to make something very clear, anyone who even hints at supporting or enabling this kind of behavior is going to lose their LGF account. You may think you're anonymous here, but if I get a call from the Secret Service about a comment posted at LGF (which I have not, to date) I will absolutely cooperate with them fully and give them everything they need to get in touch with you. And I won't even think twice about it.

As you should.

61 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:25:16am

I hope Obama has the most successful Presidency in the history of the United States. I wish the Secret Service total success.

62 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:25:25am

re: #45 reine.de.tout

I have no doubt that this is accurate. Whether I agree with Obama or not, the safety and security of the elected leaders of our country is of utmost importance, and these threats should be prosecuted fully.

...and as quickly as possible.

Quicker if its impossible.

63 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:25:47am

re: #57 The Other Les

The difference between a member of the Weather Underground and a Neonazi is the haircut. They are both anti-human trash with delusions of superior being status.

Nazis were left wing. Somehow leftists have been able to label them otherwise, but they were big time socialists and collectivists.

64 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:25:49am

re: #42 Walter L. Newton

Egads! And he has the temerity to say Charles has lost it? The enemy of my enemy could still be MY enemy, so snuggling up may just be the easiest way to get stabbed in the back.

65 FrogMarch  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:25:51am

reported

66 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:25:58am

re: #46 MandyManners

It's very fitting that their wish that Obama be assassinated was in a post defending Spencer and Vlaams Belang.

67 Stephen Macklin  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:26:34am

I wonder what the threshold for threatening is this election?

And exactly how many more 3 more or 300?

68 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:26:39am

re: #54 SpaceJesus

people posting retarded things they'll never do on the internet? oh no

It's not a fucking joke. As much as I despise CBBHO, he will be our president.

69 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:26:47am

re: #48 Sharmuta

I'm going to ding you every time you post that.

And I'm going to post it every time I find it appropriate to use it as an answer to a comment. Wee...

Spencer fuck'd up royally when he composed that email message to me. And it's not out of context, it is plain and simple.

70 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:26:50am

re: #61 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I hope Obama has the most successful Presidency in the history of the United States. I wish the Secret Service total success.

It's not logical. What he wants to do will be harmful to the country. The law of causality dictates this.

71 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:27:06am

re: #52 Charles

So, you are saying you will not support treason. Hang 'em high!

72 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:27:14am

re: #55 Archimedes

I'm not buying it. These people think Obama is sooooo special, so it's like the story of the princess and the pea. Now, to be sure, anyone who does threaten Obama is a moron, but I just have my doubts about the hype.

This is NOT hype. It's very easy to find this kind of stuff on the web.

73 itellu3times  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:27:41am

re: #39 Adrenalyn

LGF2 ? ? ?

I dunno, I think it has something to do with exposure to blue kryptonite.

I'm going to wait until they at least get into double-digits, and then sell.

74 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:27:54am

re: #66 Killgore Trout

It's very fitting that their wish that Obama be assassinated was in a post defending Spencer and Vlaams Belang.

Did anyone notify the Secret Service?

75 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:28:20am

re: #8 FurryOldGuyJeans

Amazing how the threats against Bush were accepted as being normal by so many people.

Marxism in action.

In every case on both sides one is looking at an individual who believes himself to superior in some respect to the mere mortal and thus exempt from the rules of civilized behavior. Marxists are especially funny that way.

76 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:28:44am

re: #57 The Other Les

The difference between a member of the Weather Underground and a Neonazi is the haircut. They are both anti-human trash with delusions of superior being status.

Assholes are assholes.

77 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:28:56am

re: #66 Killgore Trout

Is it still posted?

78 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:29:01am

re: #74 MandyManners

It's not worth it. It wasn't a serious threat and the Secret Service has their hands full already.

79 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:29:02am

Removing even a bad politician outside the normal and constitutional means threatens the very fabric of the Republic. The only proper way is by the ballot box or impeachment.

80 Boogberg  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:29:05am

re: #1 Walter L. Newton

But, but, but... that's just freedom of speech.
/

Tasteless as it is, yes. But I doubt the moonbats responsible for that paper mache silliness are the types who would seriously plot to assassinate (much less threaten) the President. I have the feeling that far-right kooks are much more dangerous.

81 Ringo the Gringo  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:29:06am

I have no doubt that President Obama will require a higher level of security than previous Presidents because there are some rotten people in this counrty who simply cannot stand the idea of a black man as President of the United States.

Sad, but true.

82 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:29:41am

re: #70 Archimedes

I am saying, I'd love to be wrong about him. I'd love to find out that unicorn farts really do smell like cotton candy. If everybody could be taken care of and we could still prosper as a Nation, it'd be cool.

Do I think it'll happen. Nope. But, I wish him all of the luck in the world.

83 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:30:05am

re: #77 Sharmuta
Near the bottom of the page now. Entry titled "Is the Vlaams Belang anti-Israel?"

84 DocDale  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:30:10am

I doubt the betting agencies would be so cautious unless there was something serious in it.

85 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:30:24am

re: #52 Charles

And by the way, just to make something very clear, anyone who even hints at supporting or enabling this kind of behavior is going to lose their LGF account. You may think you're anonymous here, but if I get a call from the Secret Service about a comment posted at LGF (which I have not, to date) I will absolutely cooperate with them fully and give them everything they need to get in touch with you. And I won't even think twice about it.

And I will add something to what Charles says. I will gladly pass on any email that come my way from anyone who makes questionable statements to me privately. I use my real name here, my real picture (well, 8 years old picture, I'm skinny now) and links are available to my address.

I prefer it this way, but, I will not hesitate to take down anyone who should misuse my very public access.

86 Ringo the Gringo  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:30:39am

re: #59 neocon hippie

I don't think so.

87 AuntAcid  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:31:52am

Can we still toss softballs in his presence?

88 Arrr  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:32:12am

As an Obama supporter, I have to admire the consistent intellectual honesty this site has displayed, as opposed to most right wing sites (though I'm not convinced LGF is right wing).

Dishonesty and fanaticism is also pretty common on left-leaning sites, which is why I can't stand them.

89 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:32:56am

re: #72 Charles

This is NOT hype. It's very easy to find this kind of stuff on the web.


Yes, but how does it compare to the incredible threats against Bush? I can't count how many times I've seen him accused of mass murder and postings on how people wanted him dead. The media didn't care on whit about it.

I'm betting it's worse of Bush. It might be hard to compare Clinton, since the web was just coming into its own during his presidency.

90 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:33:53am

re: #88 Arrr

As an Obama supporter

Can I change your screename to ARRRRGGGGGGGG!?!?!?

91 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:34:12am

re: #89 Archimedes

Did the neo-nazis gain 2000 new members the day after Bush was elected?

92 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:34:58am

re: #89 Archimedes

Yes, but how does it compare to the incredible threats against Bush? I can't count how many times I've seen him accused of mass murder and postings on how people wanted him dead. The media didn't care on whit about it.

I'm betting it's worse of Bush. It might be hard to compare Clinton, since the web was just coming into its own during his presidency.

on (in bold) = one

93 pat  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:35:19am

This story is complete BS. Total tripe. Their are no attributions that verify the headline. The government spokesman is not associated with the Secret Service. The law enforcement types are local. The threats cited are admitted to be mere posturing. And one was thoroughly debunked at the time of occurrence and is misdescribed by the reporter. The vests were not bullet proof. They were bullet vests. The type used by hunters. Because that is what the were. This is pure propaganda.

94 UberInfidel67  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:35:45am

re: #21 aboo-Hoo-Hoo I just don't want to hear, for the next four years, how racist we still are because of the threats to him. It is gonna get old real quick. He will use this to his advantage.

95 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:35:54am

re: #88 Arrr

Well, heck. I'm an Obama supporter now. Loyal opposition, but loyal.

96 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:36:20am

re: #89 Archimedes

Yes, but how does it compare to the incredible threats against Bush? I can't count how many times I've seen him accused of mass murder and postings on how people wanted him dead. The media didn't care on whit about it.

I'm betting it's worse of Bush. It might be hard to compare Clinton, since the web was just coming into its own during his presidency.

Look, this thread has nothing to do with who's getting MORE threats as much as it has to do with the fact that he is getting threats period.

And I think that by Charles pointing this out, he is also reminding us that LGF's is not the place for that kind of posting.

It's not a pissing match right now on who is hated more or less.

97 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:36:47am

re: #83 Killgore Trout

Near the bottom of the page now. Entry titled "Is the Vlaams Belang anti-Israel?"

Someone should report that to the Secret Service. Whether it's serious or not, it's not for us to decide; posting threats on the Internet is very dangerous.

98 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:36:49am

re: #91 Sharmuta

Did the neo-nazis gain 2000 new members the day after Bush was elected?

I have no idea, but I know lots of leftists went ape when he was elected. Many threatened to leave the country.

99 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:37:23am

re: #11 Adrenalyn

I'd call BS
BUT
the KKK wanted him elected
so they could recruit more

then again, they are a tiny fraction of Americana

and the Huffpo, DKos, Dunderground crowd is WAY MORE numerous and violent

add in veterans for peace, code pink, academia, etc....
and you have some seriously disturbed people to look out for no matter your persuasion

Steven Michael Barry, the founder of the Special Forces Underground, at the beginning of his spiral into the sinkhole of Neonazism called on everyone to vote for Al Gore in the 2000 election. Why? Because Gore would at some point provoke a military coup against civil government.

Obviously I couldn't do that. Not everyone in the SFU or their civilian supporters drank the NNS Kool-Aid with Steve.

As I have said before, losing a friend and mentor to the Neonazis sucks.

100 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:37:35am

re: #93 pat

This story is complete BS. Total tripe.

Could you please sit on the other side of the room? When Stinky comes in with the stick, I want a good view! (and also don't want my shirt soiled by flying grey matter)

101 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:37:47am

re: #93 pat

This story is complete BS. Total tripe.

Sorry, pat -- you're just wrong about that.

102 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:37:54am

re: #81 Ringo the Gringo
I'm quite certain that you are correct about that. And the troubling thing is that the true haters - not "right wingers" but skinheads, Nazi's (neo or old) and the KKK are far more dangerous than are the folks with BDS and paper mache puppet heads.
I wish Obama every success in the world in serving this nation as our President.

103 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:38:06am

re: #98 Archimedes

I have no idea, but I know lots of leftists went ape when he was elected. Many threatened to leave the country.

That was then, this is now. What happened in the past was unacceptable, so should this happening now. A threat is a threat, no matter who gets it.

104 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:38:29am

re: #95 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Well, heck. I'm an Obama supporter now. Loyal opposition, but loyal.

To refine my position, I support the President of the United States. I also reserve my to stand in opposition to his Marxist policies.

105 debutaunt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:38:41am

re: #81 Ringo the Gringo

I have no doubt that President Obama will require a higher level of security than previous Presidents because there are some rotten people in this counrty who simply cannot stand the idea of a black man as President of the United States.

Sad, but true.

It seemed like a huge group had a problem with George Bush, too.

106 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:38:52am

re: #98 Archimedes

Pointing to the left is not an excuse.

107 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:38:57am

re: #96 Walter L. Newton

Look, this thread has nothing to do with who's getting MORE threats as much as it has to do with the fact that he is getting threats period.

And I think that by Charles pointing this out, he is also reminding us that LGF's is not the place for that kind of posting.

It's not a pissing match right now on who is hated more or less.

It's no the place for threats, sure. I would never do it. However, it's a good idea to question this sort of rhetoric, because the goal is often to shut up any opposition. Obama is dangerous, and it is our right to be concerned.

108 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:39:01am

re: #13 Sharmuta

That is some disturbing stuff. 2000 new stormfront members? Sad and scary.

Think of them as 2000 new targets.

Think of it as evolution in action.

109 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:39:04am

re: #104 jcm

To refine my position, I support the President of the United States. I also reserve my to stand in opposition to his Marxist policies.

What you said.

110 VegasRick  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:40:10am

re: #109 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

What you said.

Twice!

111 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:40:40am

re: #106 Sharmuta

Who's to say that some of those new Stormfront members aren't KosKids looking to stir up some shit?

112 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:41:04am

re: #110 VegasRick

Twice!

Thrice

113 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:41:28am

re: #106 Sharmuta

Pointing to the left is not an excuse.

Listen, I'm not excusing anything. I'm applying logic here. They seem so much more concerned about a left wing candidate than a right wing candidate, and that's simply not right. I mean, I think this is business as usual, not some new excessive number of threats.

114 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:41:30am

re: #111 MandyManners

Who's to say that some of those new Stormfront members aren't KosKids looking to stir up some shit?

I sure wouldn't disregard the notion out of hand without some reflection.

115 shanec99  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:41:31am

Look guys, we all must agree that threats against the President of the US are unacceptable.
We will oppose him if we believe his vision and philosophy are wrong, but he is the embodiment of the American people's will as demonstrated by the votes they cast on election day.
If I see or hear of anyone threatening our President, the fool will be reported immediately to law enforcement.

116 reine.de.tout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:41:37am

re: #89 Archimedes

Yes, but how does it compare to the incredible threats against Bush? I can't count how many times I've seen him accused of mass murder and postings on how people wanted him dead. The media didn't care on whit about it.

I'm betting it's worse of Bush. It might be hard to compare Clinton, since the web was just coming into its own during his presidency.

I think the law enforcement folks will investigate any credible threats they find, against any elected official, and it doesn't really matter how A compares to B, that's a matter of reporting.

The internet, imo, makes it much easier to find these folks.

117 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:41:50am

re: #18 Killgore Trout

Not to mention the LLL's attempts to make "citizen's arrests" of Bush and others. Could you imagine if someone tried that on Obama?

Ever heard of Mark Koernke?

He would bring along his well armed buddies, of course.

118 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:42:06am

re: #107 Archimedes

It's no the place for threats, sure. I would never do it. However, it's a good idea to question this sort of rhetoric, because the goal is often to shut up any opposition. Obama is dangerous, and it is our right to be concerned.

I am not trying to speak for Charles, but remember, Charles runs one of the most popular blogs on the internet. He is also connected to a lot of other major bloggers and hosting companies.

As in any industry, I suspect Charles has more inside information as to what is going on among blogs, the kinds of messages that are posted (and deleted) and so on.

What I imagine is that this article backs up a lot of what Charles and the leaders in the blogosphere already know.

119 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:42:09am

re: #95 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Well, heck. I'm an Obama supporter now. Loyal opposition, but loyal.

F-ing A. As Americans, we do not pick our government via violence. Defending Obama is defending the American System. I was not old enough to vote when Kennedy was elected, but as I developed political awareness I saw that he was on the opposing team from myself. But I was majorly pissed when he was killed. I greatly resent anyone interfering with the American political process.

120 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:42:33am

re: #103 FurryOldGuyJeans

That was then, this is now. What happened in the past was unacceptable, so should this happening now. A threat is a threat, no matter who gets it.

Have you ever see the movie The Lion King? There is a great little moral lesson in there.

121 pat  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:42:54am

Has anyone gone to Stormfront recently? What gives there?

122 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:43:35am

re: #113 Archimedes

This behavior from the media should be expected. It does not, however, alter the fact that people are sliding into bad craziness if they think turning to stormfront is a solution!

123 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:43:46am

re: #120 Archimedes

Have you ever see the movie The Lion King? There is a great little moral lesson in there.

I have seen the movie and see no connection to the point you are trying to make.

124 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:43:57am

re: #121 pat

Has anyone gone to Stormfront recently? What gives there?

My level 4 hazmat suit is in the shop for repairs.........

125 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:44:34am

re: #121 pat

Has anyone gone to Stormfront recently? What gives there?

There's not enough bleach in the world to clean my body and mind.

126 shanec99  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:44:40am

re: #52 Charles

And by the way, just to make something very clear, anyone who even hints at supporting or enabling this kind of behavior is going to lose their LGF account. You may think you're anonymous here, but if I get a call from the Secret Service about a comment posted at LGF (which I have not, to date) I will absolutely cooperate with them fully and give them everything they need to get in touch with you. And I won't even think twice about it.

Thank you Charles.

127 notutopia  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:45:09am

Think about the real consequences if Obama was needed to be replaced.
Biden becomes president.
Next in command would be Pelosi.
It just keeps getting worse.

Far Left and Right extremists who are disgruntled with Obama and use murder or bodily harm as their motive to free this country of him need to think about the lawful implications as well as the unintended consequences of their actions. There would be no end to the social mistrust that would develop.

The threats are not just originating from the US. He is getting them from around the world.

The Secret Service never sleeps.

128 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:45:23am

re: #114 FurryOldGuyJeans

I sure wouldn't disregard the notion out of hand without some reflection.

Who benefits from chaos, confusion and hatred?

129 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:45:44am

Am I glad I do not know what "storm front" even is?

130 pat  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:45:54am

If I get a chance this afternoon I will check out a few nut sites and report back. Will have to get rain coat out of closet to protect me from their spewing.

131 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:00am

re: #111 MandyManners
Hmmm. Good point!

132 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:12am

re: #128 MandyManners

Who benefits from chaos, confusion and hatred?

People who hate freedom and want to destroy the Great American Experiment.

133 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:18am

re: #129 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Am I glad I do not know what "storm front" even is?

Buncha' fucking Nazis.

134 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:25am

re: #119 legalpad

I greatly resent anyone interfering with the American political process.

did you get the smoking memo from 2004 ?
hint.......CBS

135 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:31am

re: #129 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Am I glad I do not know what "storm front" even is?

It's a neo-nazi website.

136 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:39am

Even when they win, they still have to act like victims. The truth is what Charles points out: The left is hate filled. The level of vitriol and hatred spewing forth from them about Bush clouded their minds so much that they were willing to lose a (another) war, hurt the USA and let our society be less safe, just as long as Bush was defied.

I do not hate Barack Obama, I just disagree with his policies and political philosophy. Are there people on my side of the spectrum that are crazy? Of course there are. But, if you want to see real hatred and anger, just look at any protest on the left.....illegal aliens, angry gays, anti-war, ant-fur, anti-whatever....they are all driven by anger and hatred....it must be tough to live like that.

137 vapig  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:47am

I wonder how much of this story is accurate and how much is contrived - like korans in the toilet or nooses hung by the "victims" themselves.

138 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:46:49am

re: #128 MandyManners

Who benefits from chaos, confusion and hatred?

Both the International Socialists (commies) and the National Socialists (nazis).

Note they are both socialists.

139 Boogberg  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:47:33am

re: #128 MandyManners

Who benefits from chaos, confusion and hatred?

The Joooooos!
/

140 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:47:38am

re: #116 reine.de.tout
"The internet, imo, makes it much easier to find these folks."
Yep.

141 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:47:47am

re: #133 MandyManners

Buncha' fucking Nazis.

No they are NOT. They are a buncha' fucking asshole Nazis

142 debutaunt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:47:49am

re: #112 sattv4u2

Thrice

"Let's make it four..."

143 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:48:07am

re: #111 MandyManners

Who's to say that some of those new Stormfront members aren't KosKids looking to stir up some shit?

Mandy, I wouldn't doubt that some Kos types are switching their entire philosophy now just because they can't imagine a world where they aren't just disagreeable little shits.

144 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:48:19am

re: #139 Boogberg

The Joooooos!
/

That'll be 10% deducted from your Zionist check at the end of the month?

145 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:48:26am

re: #141 Walter L. Newton

No they are NOT. They are a buncha' fucking asshole Nazis

That's redundant.

146 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:48:53am

re: #137 vapig

I wonder how much of this story is accurate and how much is contrived - like korans in the toilet or nooses hung by the "victims" themselves.

Don't matter. Find out the source, squash the source. Doesn't matter if credible or not.

147 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:49:10am

I respect the office of the President explicitly; Obama will have to prove he is worthy of that respect.

148 Macker  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:49:14am

re: #52 Charles

There is a liberal board I hang out on. A few years ago, I saw a post on it where they wished that a gun be put to President Bush's head. After I got over the shock of seeing that in print, I said "FRAK THIS!" and reported the post to the Secret Service.
And not even a second thought.

149 Nevergiveup  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:49:25am

A thread like this really depresses me. Any way I hope Navy beat ND today.

150 vapig  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:49:26am

re: #139 Boogberg

The Joooooos!
/


You're being ironic, but there are those out there that would make the accusations in all seriousness.

151 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:49:54am

re: #129 Fat Bastard Vegetarian Yes, you should be VERY glad that you don't know and no matter what anyone says, DON'T GO FOR A VISIT.

152 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:14am

re: #137 vapig

I wonder how much of this story is accurate and how much is contrived - like korans in the toilet or nooses hung by the "victims" themselves.

ANY accuracy is a potential setback for the Republic.

153 FightingBack  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:15am

All ethical persons condemn threats of violence.

It might be a little easier for some to feel outraged if we weren't subjected to, for example, "fireworks" reports, etc, when the target is the US military; or forgiveness and pleas of youthful ignorance when the realized target was Law Enforcement. Evenhandedness in the response to threats would unite us.

Pres-elect Obama can use this opportunity take the lead.

154 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:17am

re: #149 Nevergiveup

VMI beat Kentucky last night. In Basketball.

155 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:20am

re: #145 Sharmuta

That's redundant.

That's too bad. LOL

156 Macker  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:23am

re: #127 notutopia

Actually, Joe the Biden would become President, which would create a vacancy in the Veep slot. Whether he chooses Speaker Pelosi to fill said vacancy is another question entirely.

157 ciaospirit  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:29am

re: #17 jcm

Not to diminish the serious of the subject, but I wonder if Joe the Plumber asking a tough question is categorized as a "threat?

Yes, I'd like to know how they are defining "threat". The internet is bigger now than ever, so more ranting and raving goes on just as a matter of numbers. An official says rhetoric on the Internet has no capability, credibility, or specificity. But it's still a threat.

A law enforcement official who also spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly said that during the campaign there was a spike in anti-Obama rhetoric on the Internet — "a lot of ranting and raving with no capability, credibility or specificity to it."

158 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:42am

re: #136 Desert Dog

Even when they win, they still have to act like victims. The truth is what Charles points out: The left is hate filled. The level of vitriol and hatred spewing forth from them about Bush clouded their minds so much that they were willing to lose a (another) war, hurt the USA and let our society be less safe, just as long as Bush was defied.

I do not hate Barack Obama, I just disagree with his policies and political philosophy. Are there people on my side of the spectrum that are crazy? Of course there are. But, if you want to see real hatred and anger, just look at any protest on the left.....illegal aliens, angry gays, anti-war, ant-fur, anti-whatever....they are all driven by anger and hatred....it must be tough to live like that.

I don't think there's anything to be gained by denying reality here, or saying "the left is worse." The simple fact is that there are such things as right wing extremists in this country. You can find them all over the Internet, and not just at stormfront. I've seen many posts at sites like Free Republic that are disturbingly extreme; I don't even go to that site any more because it's so prevalent.

If you don't think the far right is in a serious rage over the election of Obama, you're in denial.

159 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:45am

re: #128 MandyManners

Who benefits from chaos, confusion and hatred?

Stan

160 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:49am

re: #94 UberInfidel67

I just don't want to hear, for the next four years, how racist we still are because of the threats to him. It is gonna get old real quick. He will use this to his advantage.

I don't have any control over who uses what information how or what you might hear or read.

My statement was based on information relayed to me and as I stated, the story is accurate in its reporting - that's it.

We might not like Obama but he is now our President(period) - whatever may come.

161 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:50:54am

re: #146 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

How's the wife, BTW?

162 notutopia  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:51:05am

re: #78 Killgore Trout

If the threat is to murder. It is not little Killgore.

163 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:51:19am

re: #111 MandyManners

Who's to say that some of those new Stormfront members aren't KosKids looking to stir up some shit?

Or Kos Kids putting on different set of blinders.

164 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:51:20am

re: #107 Archimedes

It's not the place for threats, sure. I would never do it. However, it's a good idea to question this sort of rhetoric, because the goal is often to shut up any opposition. Obama is dangerous, and it is our right to be concerned.

Threats and questioning are universes apart. They have no connection to each other. There are a thousand ways to oppose the errant policies of Mr. Obama which are built into our system, many of which have been sorely neglected by Republicans. If one considers him "dangerous", then there is much to do that is far more effective than threats or violence, which would have the opposite effect. It is not the man as such who is dangerous. It is the political ideology his supporters promote. We know they want to silence their opponents. They have always done this because they are deceptive and their case is weak. They will not succeed.

165 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:51:34am

re: #123 FurryOldGuyJeans

I have seen the movie and see no connection to the point you are trying to make.

Well, there is a scene in there where the monkey whacks the Lion with a stick and the lion says "Hey, why did you do that?" The monkey responds "It does not matter, it's in the past."

The point is that you need to learn from the past, and it does matter. I don't know, maybe I'm misconstruing you, but I do take what happened in the past seriously, because it connects to the present and future. And, of course, they are making comparisons to the past themselves when they speak of "records".

Anyone remember how wall-eyed crazy that woman was that did the photo cover of McCain for the Atlantic Monthly?

166 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:51:36am

re: #149 Nevergiveup

A thread like this really depresses me. Any way I hope Navy beat ND today.

The Navy is off the coast of North Dakota? That doesn't make any sense. I didn't even know we were at war with them?

167 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:51:39am

Hmmmm, threats against Bush were investigated. Charges were filed. People spent lots of $$$ defending themselves. While I am at odds with Obama's political position and the fact that in many locations the democrats committed (imho a felony) voter fraud, he is our president elect.

I grew up with political assassinations/attempted JKF, MLK, BK, RR and they put a dark blanket over our political processes.

Let BHO sink his own administration, which I suspect will be more crooked than Grant's. Our country has had worse and we recovered. We will recover from BHO's ineptitude and corruption as well.

168 Nevergiveup  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:52:37am

re: #154 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

VMI beat Kentucky last night. In Basketball.

So i guess UNC doesn't have to worry next week?

169 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:52:43am

re: #166 Walter L. Newton

The Navy is off the coast of North Dakota? That doesn't make any sense. I didn't even know we were at war with them?

We've always been at war with them.

170 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:52:50am

re: #161 sattv4u2

How's the wife, BTW?

Gonna get that Lithotripsy thang next month. Bunch of kidney stones. She got through this bout (almost said little bout, to which she would slap me stupider) with pain pills that she didn't even take.

I married a trooper.

171 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:53:07am

re: #160 aboo-Hoo-Hoo

We might not like Obama but he is now our President(period) - whatever may come.


Orderly transition of power. If we don't like what's going on, we hamstring the President with an opposition Congress in 2010 and send him packing in 2012.

Assuming we still have fair and free elections.

172 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:53:56am

Frankly the worst possible thing for us (classical liberal) would be for Obama to be assassinated. It would quell any opposition to his ideas and the left would feel the need to set in stone an Obama legacy.

Long live a one term, President Obama.

173 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:53:57am

re: #169 MandyManners

We've always been at war with them.

Ha, you hurled a 1984 reference back at me, good shot. LOL.

174 vapig  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:01am

re: #152 FurryOldGuyJeans

ANY accuracy is a potential setback for the Republic politburo.

There! Fixed it for you...

175 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:08am

re: #151 realwest

I lurk at all sorts of blogs. If you do not know what the idiots of the world are thinking and saying, you cannot combat it. I read KOS alot, HuffPO, and, I have ventured over to Stormfront and the Gates of Vienna as well.

From what I can tell, most of those blogs are echo chambers. For the most part, I do not agree with 99% of what they write, but I know what they write...unlike most of the drones over there....they know nothing about what is considered proper over here.

176 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:12am

re: #122 Sharmuta

This behavior from the media should be expected.

Well, it should be expected in the sense that they are corrupt, but I always hold them to an objective standard which they rarely meet.


It does not, however, alter the fact that people are sliding into bad craziness if they think turning to stormfront is a solution!

The stormfront is THE PROBLEM. These people are going in the same direction Obama is, but with more efficiency.

177 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:13am

re: #166 Walter L. Newton

The Navy is off the coast of North Dakota? That doesn't make any sense. I didn't even know we were at war with them?

North Dakota is now on the Pacific?!?!? Al Gore was RIGHT!

178 Pope Insouciance IV  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:14am

In Milwaukee the police are investigating an incident in which someone (at a police station) drew a picture of a bullet next to a photo of OBama,
A childish graffito. But they're playing it like a real threat.
If someone did that with a picture of Bush they just would have thrown it in the trash.

179 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:22am

re: #165 Archimedes

What happened in the past is not what matters now, but you want to get all indignant about it. Knock yerself out, don't bother asking me to join in though.

180 ciaospirit  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:35am
The Secret Service also has cautioned the public not to assume that any threats against Obama are due to racism.
181 SixDegrees  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:54:47am

From the article, on it's main point:

"...said officials aware of the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity."

Uh, huh.

Sounds like another Just-So story concocted by the Left.

How about, you know, some actual evidence to back this claim up? Any comparative statistics? Any numbers at all?

No, I didn't think so. The entire article is filled with innuendo, half-facts and baseless accusations, and attempts to create some sort of massive, nationwide movement out of a small handful of cases that are certainly loathsome, but are far from unique or outstanding when compared with the rantings against Bush or any other Republican that can be dredged out of the slime bubbling at the Daily Kos or the Democratic Underground on any given day, at any given hour, at any time at all over the last several years.

Let's see some actual substance to back up the claim that this is any different at all from the rate or severity of similar incidents in the past.

182 Sharmuta  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:12am

re: #172 jcm

I agree completely. We don't need a martyr.

183 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:17am

re: #169 MandyManners

We've always been at war with them.

Smug bastards, ain't they. "We've got Mount Rushmore!"

184 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:27am

The ones to worry about are the ones who aren't making enough noise to be noticed*. The rest are just expressing themselves like the left has with Bush over the last 8 years.

Four years or so of playing the victim whenever something negative happens? Yippee... at least with Bush one could have some solace that the executive office was managed well, the military got what it needed and other countries had learned some respect for us etc... not looking forward to the world "testing" the O...

*and, just in my opinion, even then the odds for something like that being carried out lean more towards lone nutjob acting out aka Oswald evidently did than any organized effort from groups who benefit from whining.

185 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:41am

re: #172 jcm

Frankly the worst possible thing for us (classical liberal) would be for Obama to be assassinated. It would quell any opposition to his ideas and the left would feel the need to set in stone an Obama legacy.

Long live a one term, President Obama.

May God bless him, and keep him -- and keep him far away from my assets.

186 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:48am

re: #121 pat

Has anyone gone to Stormfront recently? What gives there?

It's not something I recommend.

187 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:48am

re: #134 Adrenalyn

did you get the smoking memo from 2004 ?
hint.......CBS

Indeed. Conservatives should make a space-program level effort to effect MSM influence. It is one of the worst offenders. The CBS thing was, of course, one of their less clever efforts.

188 debutaunt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:49am

re: #166 Walter L. Newton

The Navy is off the coast of North Dakota? That doesn't make any sense. I didn't even know we were at war with them?

Thanks! I was going to check an online map.

189 Truck Monkey  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:55:50am

re: #171 Who Watches the Watchmen?

Orderly transition of power. If we don't like what's going on, we hamstring the President with an opposition Congress in 2010 and send him packing in 2012.

Assuming we still have fair and free elections.

Bid assumption there.

190 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:56:23am

re: #175 Desert Dog
And that's why I don't go over there. I'll read reports from LGFer's who go there, but I refuse to go there because I value my sanity (such as it is) and because I don't want to drive up their hit count.

191 BeckoningChasm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:56:36am

I agree that threats against BO are stupid and should be investigated, but I question that he's had more threats than Bush. Hell, GWB had whole books and movies calling for his murder.

192 NoSubmission  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:56:53am

Why would anyone call this story BS? It is absolutely plausible [and shameful] that his election would elicit a mountain of hate.

I don't like Obama and I'm still getting my mind around this whole thing, but if anything bad happened to him it would be terrible for our country. I happen to also think his little daughters are sweet and adorable. They don't deserve this kind of anguish.

193 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:57:07am

re: #183 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Smug bastards, ain't they. "We've got Mount Rushmore!"

There is no Mount Rushmore.

194 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:57:31am

re: #185 Who Watches the Watchmen?

May God bless him, and keep him -- and keep him far away from my assets.

Amen Rabbi.......

195 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:57:44am

re: #179 FurryOldGuyJeans

What happened in the past is not what matters now, but you want to get all indignant about it. Knock yerself out, don't bother asking me to join in though.

Hey now, I'm not "all indignant". To me this is the usual ho-hum press coverage I take with a giant grain of salt.

196 Nevergiveup  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:57:46am

Mean while the AD of ND is explaining what a great job CW is doing?

197 deportman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:57:58am

Overblown, over exaggerated, over nothing...

198 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:58:07am

re: #178 Pope Insouciance IV

In Milwaukee the police are investigating an incident in which someone (at a police station) drew a picture of a bullet next to a photo of OBama,
A childish graffito. But they're playing it like a real threat.
If someone did that with a picture of Bush they just would have thrown it in the trash.

Why the fuck are we trying to play "Obama's threat are more important than Bushes threats."

I think the whole point here is he IS OUR PRESIDENT ELECT and it's not cool that there are threats against him, in any shape or form, in any numbers, big or small.

And on top of that, Charles is using this article to make a point that he doesn't want any of this sort of sick dialog playing out on LGF's.

So, stop with the fucking pissing contest, it makes you sound like some whining KosKid.

199 Who Watches the Watchmen?  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:58:32am

re: #178 Pope Insouciance IV

In Milwaukee the police are investigating an incident in which someone (at a police station) drew a picture of a bullet next to a photo of OBama,
A childish graffito. But they're playing it like a real threat.
If someone did that with a picture of Bush they just would have thrown it in the trash displayed it in an art gallery.

Fixed that for you.

200 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:58:32am

re: #158 Charles

I agree there are looney's on the right. I do not deny that. And, I think that when one of these idiots pops up, they should be held accountable and cast out from mainsteam society. The point I was attempting to make is the difference between the the left and the right is that the left accepted all of that Bush hatred as normal and proper. I do not think the right will embrace Obama Derangement Syndrome and make it one of the "planks" of our political outlook like the left did with "BDS".

201 FrogMarch  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:58:33am

Sadly, white supremacists, who are a small minority in this nation, are going to cause trouble and recruit new members. I think Glenn R. had a link a few weeks back showing the emboldened pointy hooded supremacists holding a rally somewhere in TN.
Sad.

I think Obama's election proves we are a just nation willing to elect a person of color - but that doesn't mean racism is dead.
If Obama lost - I think we would be hearing from the other side of the racist coin - the black panthers.

202 debutaunt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:58:40am

re: #172 jcm

Frankly the worst possible thing for us (classical liberal) would be for Obama to be assassinated. It would quell any opposition to his ideas and the left would feel the need to set in stone an Obama legacy.

Long live a one term, President Obama.

LBJ did that and the negative results are still apparent.

203 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:58:46am

re: #172 jcm

Frankly the worst possible thing for us (classical liberal) would be for Obama to be assassinated. It would quell any opposition to his ideas and the left would feel the need to set in stone an Obama legacy.

Long live a one term, President Obama.

I did research into the Kennedy administration by reading newspaper archives before his assassination and all I can say is that he was not the well-respected President the way he is portrayed now. He was a president both widely hated and loved, and there was some serious opposition to him and his policies. There were even some very serious calls for his impeachment that were stopped only by his death.

204 CharlieBravo  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:58:58am

"officials aware of the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity"

Must be hard on 'officials' since what is a threat to one isn't a threat to others... thinking of effigy of Sarah being left hanging for days.

205 vapig  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:59:05am

re: #185 Who Watches the Watchmen?

May God bless him, and keep him -- and keep him far away from my assets.

Amen! Amen! And a HUGE AMEN to that!

206 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:59:43am

re: #126 shanec99

Thank you Charles.

I don't want a legitimate difference in policy with Obama be blamed for assassination threats - like Clinton linked Rush with the Oklahoma City Bombing - blaming talk radio.

207 ryannon  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:59:48am

re: #85 Walter L. Newton

And I will add something to what Charles says. I will gladly pass on any email that come my way from anyone who makes questionable statements to me privately. I use my real name here, my real picture (well, 8 years old picture, I'm skinny now)....


So how did you lose weight?

208 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:00:22am

re: #166 Walter L. Newton

The Navy is off the coast of North Dakota? That doesn't make any sense. I didn't even know we were at war with them?

You say Eastasia
I say Eurasia
You say Eastasia
I say Eurasia

Eastasia!
Eurasia!
Eastasia!
Eurasia!

Let's call the whole thing off!

209 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:00:40am

re: #193 MandyManners

There is no Mount Rushmore.

Wall Drug? They've got a bunch of signs.

(oh, South Dakota.)

North Dakota has wood-chippers though.

210 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:01:17am

re: #198 Walter L. Newton

Why the fuck are we trying to play "Obama's threat are more important than Bushes threats."

So, you're saying we should be indignant about threats against Obama. If that's the point, I'm with you. People who do things like that are worthless morons. I have no truck with them.

211 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:01:30am

re: #207 ryannon

So how did you lose weight?

If it taste's good, spit it out. Easy.

212 debutaunt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:01:33am

re: #193 MandyManners

There is no Mount Rushmore.

Those bastards erased it again?

213 Quilly Mammoth  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:01:47am

There are three things here. The first is that there really are Klan members in the USA and there are more of them and their sympathizers than we would like to admit. More people are on line now then ever before, thus the moron quotient goes up and fools that would never have been heard in the past now are.

Lastly there is a deep desire among a great deal of people to do unto Barack as Kos et al did unto Dubya. They then say things they really don't mean literally, but in their anger go overboard. And because there really is a racist thug element still in American society law enforcement _has_ to have a heightened sense of awareness about anything that might be a threat to the President. So when someone says "I wish he were dead" about Dubya it really wasn't a threat just an off color comment...now such a statement can't be ignored about Barack.

214 Steffan  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:01:49am

I really don't think much will come of this, except a few people with very big mouths who chould have kept them shut. Said people will find themselves Persons of Interest with the USSS.

ODS doesn't seem nearly as prevalent as BDS or PDS.

I'm willing to cut him some slack until he actually takes office.... even though some of the things he's doing ("Office of the President-Elect", anyone?) make me cringe.

215 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:02:13am

re: #207 ryannon

So how did you lose weight?

Walter? Can I take this one?

Walter is unabashedly and unashamedly poor.

I admire Walter greatly.

Wait, I can't remember the story. How'd you lose the weight Walter/

216 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:02:57am

re: #203 FurryOldGuyJeans

When JFK was killed there were a few students celebrating the early news and this was at an elementary school. The military despised him.

217 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:03:01am

re: #201 FrogMarch

Sadly, white supremacists, who are a small minority in this nation, are going to cause trouble and recruit new members. I think Glenn R. had a link a few weeks back showing the emboldened pointy hooded supremacists holding a rally somewhere in TN.
Sad.

I think Obama's election proves we are a just nation willing to elect a person of color - but that doesn't mean racism is dead.
If Obama lost - I think we would be hearing from the other side of the racist coin - the black panthers.

Racism has existed as long as there have been two races on earth in contact with each other. It's has been the norm world wide. What is unusual is individualism, that says a man should be treated as an individual. This is the American spirit.

218 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:03:25am

re: #209 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Wall Drug? They've got a bunch of signs.

(oh, South Dakota.)

North Dakota has wood-chippers though.

I think that's Brainerd, Minnesota where you can rent a wood chipper.

219 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:04:05am

re: #218 The Other Les

I think that's Brainerd, Minnesota where you can rent a wood chipper.

LOVE the movie "Fargo".

220 Shug  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:04:11am

re: #121 pat

Has anyone gone to Stormfront recently? What gives there?

Nope. I also haven't gone outside and stuck my face in the first steaming pile of dogshit I find either.

221 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:04:21am

I'm going to make a cheeseburger while it's still legal.

222 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:04:49am

re: #215 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Walter? Can I take this one? Walter is unabashedly and unashamedly poor. I admire Walter greatly. Wait, I can't remember the story. How'd you lose the weight Walter/

I'm blushing, I don't know what to say, all this admiration, shit, my slow decent into oblivion is working so well for my career and my public persona, I think I will move into a cardboard box next week. Only thing is, I can't stand wet cardboard.

223 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:04:52am

< re: #218 The Other Les

I think that's Brainerd, Minnesota where you can rent a wood chipper.


One Used Wood Chipper, For Sale

224 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:05:15am

re: #220 Shug Nice. Accurate and succinct!

225 Nevergiveup  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:05:17am

re: #220 Shug

Nope. I also haven't gone outside and stuck my face in the first steaming pile of dogshit I find either.

Hum, I wonder what's for lunch?

226 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:05:45am

re: #222 Walter L. Newton

I'm blushing, I don't know what to say, all this admiration, shit, my slow decent into oblivion is working so well for my career and my public persona, I think I will move into a cardboard box next week. Only thing is, I can't stand wet cardboard.

Good artists are supposed to suffer, you know. ;)

227 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:05:55am

re: #201 FrogMarch

Sadly, white supremacists, who are a small minority in this nation, are going to cause trouble and recruit new members. I think Glenn R. had a link a few weeks back showing the emboldened pointy hooded supremacists holding a rally somewhere in TN.
Sad.

I think Obama's election proves we are a just nation willing to elect a person of color - but that doesn't mean racism is dead.
If Obama lost - I think we would be hearing from the other side of the racist coin - the black panthers.

It was founded in Pulaski, TN.

228 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:06:20am

re: #222 Walter L. Newton

oblivion is working so well for my career

Much lower tax rates in oblivion. Sounds like a good idea.

229 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:07:01am

Decent s/b descent

230 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:07:03am

re: #222 Walter L. Newton
Try using a large refrigerator Cardboard box and a smaller refrigerator box inside that one - use some newspaper in between the two and you should stay nice and dry!

231 Quilly Mammoth  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:07:25am

And if people don;t think the Klan is around, dangerous and growing read this about a woman killed last week by the Klan.

232 Archimedes  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:07:41am

re: #222 Walter L. Newton

I'm blushing, I don't know what to say, all this admiration, shit, my slow decent into oblivion is working so well for my career and my public persona, I think I will move into a cardboard box next week. Only thing is, I can't stand wet cardboard.

Monty Python, Four Yorkshiremen:

233 SixDegrees  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:08:01am

re: #31 Charles

This story is absolutely NOT BS.

I believe the incidents cited are real.

I am dubious about the conclusion that there are any more such instances, or that they are any more severe, than anything that has occurred in the past. The fallback to "anonymous sources" where such conclusions are discussed raises all sorts of questions, as it always should. Questions like, "Did the reporter make this up?"

I have no doubt that reporters are paying much more attention to this than they have in the past, given their own blatant political bias. After all, a death threat against Bush, from their perspective, wouldn't even raise an eyebrow; they would view it as a "reasonable" or "commonplace" response, and consider it unworthy of reporting, anymore than a dog biting a man. When some nutjob threatens a Liberal, however, suddenly the man is biting the dog, and it gets splashed all over the front page, with anonymous sources backing up the stance that it is newsworthy because of it's alleged increased frequency.

Why would law enforcement officials insist on anonymity when making such statements? There's no law against releasing crime statistics - and threatening Federal-level politicians with harm is a Federal crime. I can understand the Secret Service not releasing such information, because their concern is with protection, and they aren't in a position to comment on any larger scale statistics that they don't collect themselves.

Was it one source? Several? The article seems to imply the latter, without mentioning any actual numbers, or any dissent.

There was a time when journalists frowned on anonymity in reported stories. They were useful while pursuing bigger fish, or more details, but an assertion coming from such a source was hardly ever mentioned in print. Now, it is commonplace, and we're supposed to trust that journalism is unbiased and self-policing enough to justify building entire stories on such unverifiable sources.

I'm calling shenanigans on this practice. Go find a source that's willing to go on record, or don't waste my time on a tale that stands no hope whatsoever of being distinguished from pure fiction.

234 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:08:06am

re: #228 legalpad

Much lower tax rates in oblivion. Sounds like a good idea.

Maybe he should write a few "Marxism is The Only Way" screeds, and soon he will be fending off more government grants than he can accept.

235 ryannon  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:08:19am

re: #219 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

LOVE the movie "Fargo".


Of which "No Country For Old Men" is the sequel - if you see what I mean...

236 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:08:36am

re: #227 MandyManners
Uh, what was founded in Pulaski, TN.?

237 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:01am

re: #231 Quilly Mammoth

And if people don;t think the Klan is around, dangerous and growing read this about a woman killed last week by the Klan.

Gee, the Klan using Muslim tactics.

238 Truck Monkey  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:02am

re: #209 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Wall Drug? They've got a bunch of signs.

(oh, South Dakota.)

North Dakota has wood-chippers though.

The wood-chipper scene
was purportedly done up there near Brainard MN don't cha know....

North Dakota is the peace garden state.

239 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:04am

In case anyone really thinks there aren't people who want to promote this stuff -- I've received two emails now from a banned user who's outraged that I wouldn't let him talk about assassination here.

And I know for a fact that this article is not exaggerated. Not one bit.

240 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:06am

re: #236 realwest

KKK

241 SpringheelJack  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:12am

re: #8 FurryOldGuyJeans

Amazing how the threats against Bush were accepted as being normal by so many people.

Does he really have more threats, or does he just have lots of people scouring the Internet for anything that could be reported as a threat? When we saw hostile comments towards Bush, did we report every one of them as threatening to the Secret Service?

242 Spiny Norman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:13am

re: #216 Perplexed

When JFK was killed there were a few students celebrating the early news and this was at an elementary school. The military despised him.

Wrong. Fake-but-accurate hogwash. Dan Rather (surprise!) reported this, claiming that they were celebrating Kennedy's assassination, but in reality, they were told they had the rest of the day off, but not why.

243 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:32am

Just getting to this thread.

FWIW, I think part of this comes from the dishonest "post-racial" packaging of Obama, given that the race card was played wherever it was convenient.

There are racists and there are people who skillfully play racism. Racists tend to be either ignorant or just plain hateful. I don't think Obama is a racist, but I do think his campaign played to racism, both to minimize/ dehumanize critics by often portraying them as racist, and by happily taking the votes and support of folks who are indeed racist (eg Rev. Wright and his followers, as well as more conflicted members of the black community who have yet to cope with the idea that they may, indeed, be racist).

That all makes for tough waters to navigate without inciting racism- but one could expect that white supremacists and lesser bigots would get frustrated and start making credible threats given how the campaign exploited both sides of the issue.

My hope at this point is that Obama can get past being a candidate who might have made a Faustian bargain and indeed lead us as a post racial president who will authentically steer us away from racial division. At the moment, things are going in the opposite direction, and it is not a good path for America to be taking.

244 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:36am

BOGALUSA, La. – Hattie Dillon got a first-hand taste of the racial hatred that gripped this city in the 1960s when a metal bolt flung by someone in an angry crowd gashed her head as she marched for civil rights.

On Wednesday, sitting on her front porch just off Main Street, the 61-year-old said Bogalusa is better now. But the bloody legacy of racial violence and brazen Ku Klux Klan activity in the area remains — evidenced by the arrest of eight local people in the death of an Oklahoma woman shot when a weekend Klan initiation went awry.

"History was made this month," Dillon said, referring to Barack Obama's election as the nation's first black president. "Then our eyes opened again."

Bogalusa, a logging town dominated by a huge paper mill about 60 miles north of New Orleans, is the largest city in Washington Parish, which, like the whole state, was won by John McCain, not Obama last week.

Sunday's killing was in St. Tammany Parish, just across the Washington Parish line and all the suspects are from Washington Parish. Cynthia C. Lynch, 43, of Tulsa, Okla., was shot in an area of vast piney woods, farms and bedroom communities separated from New Orleans by Lake Pontchartrain.

SNIP

245 ryannon  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:09:56am

re: #222 Walter L. Newton

I'm blushing, I don't know what to say, all this admiration, shit, my slow decent into oblivion is working so well for my career and my public persona, I think I will move into a cardboard box next week. Only thing is, I can't stand wet cardboard.


Have you considered putting on some weight?

246 SixDegrees  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:00am

re: #121 pat

Has anyone gone to Stormfront recently? What gives there?

You don't want to go there. If you insist, make sure you take plenty of hot water and soap; you'll need it afterward. And maybe a gallon or two of bleach, just to be on the safe side.

247 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:14am

re: #236 realwest

History of the Klan

248 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:27am

re: #239 Charles

In case anyone really thinks there aren't people who want to promote this stuff -- I've received two emails now from a banned user who's outraged that I wouldn't let him talk about assassination here.

And I know for a fact that this article is not exaggerated. Not one bit.

Your "delete email" function must get great use.

249 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:32am

re: #228 legalpad

Much lower tax rates in oblivion. Sounds like a good idea.

On a serious note. I've read a number of articles that suggest that because my whole life went from almost six figure salary 5 years ago to under 20 grand now, and because I have managed to downsize my whole existence (I am 55 and single), that I am in a better position to get through this economic downturn.

Gee, I lowered my expectations just in time.

250 Catttt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:33am

I didn't vote for Senator Obama for POTUS, but dammit, he's going to be MY President, and I pray for his safety and security.

I read some trash by a Euro this week that knocked Senator O AND the US of A as a bunch of mongrels. I suddenly felt very defensive of Senator O. I happen to love my country of mismatches and blends; my family, like many, is blended, but even if it weren't, I'd love that we are a melting pot - or perhaps a stew - of all kinds of people. It makes us strong - in that respect, Senator O is a good example of a typical American, though I think Tiger Woods would be better. :D

Importantly - we tend to forget the incredibly hard job the feds do to protect the POTUS, and obviously it just got harder. It's been a long time, thank God, since there was an incident with the POTUS, so we tend to get lulled into complaisance, but the Secret Service doesn't, and I pray for their continued success.

251 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:44am

re: #236 realwest

Uh, what was founded in Pulaski, TN.?

The KKK.

252 footballrules  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:48am

re: #9 Walter L. Newton

Thank you for writing that! The far right and far left are just as crazy. Thank goodness we live in a nation where the 20% of non-affiliated voters pick the leaders.

253 shiek al beif salami  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:10:52am

I despise the cult of personality that surrounds Obama, but I do not despise him as a man.
I despise the brutal and bloody ideologies espoused by many of his associates, but I do not despise them as men.
I despise many of the policies Obama promised to implement through his office as President, but I do not despise his office.

As an American citizen, I pray that the next four years will be a long debate about ideas and not, as we've experienced for the past sixteen years, vicious never-ending ad hominem attacks against individuals.

254 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:12:09am

re: #251 MandyManners

The KKK.

Remember the idiot who had his nic as Nathan Bedford Forrest? Charles wacked him out of the gate. One of my favorite days here.

255 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:12:34am

re: #242 Spiny Norman

Wrong. Fake-but-accurate hogwash. Dan Rather (surprise!) reported this, claiming that they were celebrating Kennedy's assassination, but in reality, they were told they had the rest of the day off, but not why.

I was at an elementary school outside of Ellsworth AFB. News came in just before lunch (pretty much preliminary reports). There were students celebrating JFK getting shot. After lunch they announced JFKs death. Mood became a bit more somber.

256 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:12:49am

re: #153 FightingBack

All ethical persons condemn threats of violence.

It might be a little easier for some to feel outraged if we weren't subjected to, for example, "fireworks" reports, etc, when the target is the US military; or forgiveness and pleas of youthful ignorance when the realized target was Law Enforcement. Evenhandedness in the response to threats would unite us.

Pres-elect Obama can use this opportunity take the lead.


I for one advocate both violence and the threat of violence.
Violence, on occasion, or the continued threat of violence is often enough needed to keep the peace. Being all PC and saying we'll never advocate violence is what emboldens our enemies, domestic and otherwise, against us when they perceive that we, as a whole, cannot stomach violence.

Our police force exists in part as a threat of violence directly to criminals, whether in violent reaction to circumstance or in simply enforcing the law and dragging them to the courts. Ask Dillinger and many others about that.

Our military exists in part as a threat of violence to other nations should they transgress against the US to enough of a degree to prod us into action against them. The Taliban learned this the hard way even though they had not directly participated in 9/11.

Unnecessary violence however is abhorrent to a peaceful society and can lead to anarchy if not put down with the needed level of violence. I do not condone most unnecessary violence* as it is essentially criminal behavior that does no good for anyone in the larger society and often no real good for those involved in the actions.

Also: "Levels of force" is simply a euphemism for "level of violence or threat of violence".

*Sports excepted as necessary and fun for the participants.

257 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:12:50am

re: #241 SpringheelJack

Does he really have more threats, or does he just have lots of people scouring the Internet for anything that could be reported as a threat? When we saw hostile comments towards Bush, did we report every one of them as threatening to the Secret Service?

I have no clue if the threats are more, and frankly could not care any less one way or the other. The very fact that Obama is getting threats is the most disturbing thing to me, the media obsession with it being their anointed one is a bandage on skin close second.

258 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:13:00am

re: #251 MandyManners

The KKK.

thank you Senator Byrd
you're the only one in the Senate who could've answered that correctly
from a first-person perspective

259 aboo-Hoo-Hoo  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:13:02am

re: #171 Who Watches the Watchmen?

Orderly transition of power. If we don't like what's going on, we hamstring the President with an opposition Congress in 2010 and send him packing in 2012.

Assuming we still have fair and free elections.

Let's hope and pray we get that far, we've a lot of enemies lining-up to take a shot.

In fact, pay close attention to leaks spilling-out of Camp Obama after the summit this weekend. Bush has made his position clear, however, Obama is another story. If Obama's position is, as one might suspect, a full 180-degrees different than Bush's it is not inconceivable that internal problems here-at-home may become compounded exponentially by factors abroad.

The last thing we need are home-bred crackpots compounding a stack of problems which many don't know or can't even begin to conceive.

260 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:13:30am

re: #249 Walter L. Newton

On a serious note. I've read a number of articles that suggest that because my whole life went from almost six figure salary 5 years ago to under 20 grand now, and because I have managed to downsize my whole existence (I am 55 and single), that I am in a better position to get through this economic downturn.

Gee, I lowered my expectations just in time.

Sounds like my plan.

261 Spiny Norman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:14:01am

re: #236 realwest

Uh, what was founded in Pulaski, TN.?

The Klan, eh?

Curiously, there are still schools all over the Old South named after Nathan Bedford Forrest. Can anyone explain this to me?

262 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:14:04am

re: #232 Archimedes

Monty Python, Four Yorkshiremen:
[Link: www.youtube.com...]

I loved it!

263 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:14:10am

re: #260 legalpad

Sounds like my plan.

Yeah. But Walter did it on purpose.

264 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:14:10am

re: #253 shiek al beif salami

I despise the cult of personality that surrounds Obama, but I do not despise him as a man.
I despise the brutal and bloody ideologies espoused by many of his associates, but I do not despise them as men.
I despise many of the policies Obama promised to implement through his office as President, but I do not despise his office.

As an American citizen, I pray that the next four years will be a long debate about ideas and not, as we've experienced for the past sixteen years, vicious never-ending ad hominem attacks against individuals.

16 years ?
clarify 9-16 if you would please

265 BigDana  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:14:23am

re: #218 The Other Les

I think that's Brainerd, Minnesota where you can rent a wood chipper.

I have a friend who lives in a small town near Brainerd. He refers to the city as "Brain-dead."

266 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:14:39am

re: #254 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Remember the idiot who had his nic as Nathan Bedford Forrest? Charles wacked him out of the gate. One of my favorite days here.

That was funny as hell......

I give Forrest two things, a cavalry tactical genius. The armored cav still uses his moves.

And, "git 'em skeered, and then keep the skeer on'em" as an operational philosophy.

267 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:14:50am

re: #254 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Remember the idiot who had his nic as Nathan Bedford Forrest? Charles wacked him out of the gate. One of my favorite days here.

Wasn't it the fastest stick ever?

268 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:15:02am

re: #240 Desert Dog
Really? I thought it originated in Missouri? Oh well, I reckon it doesn't matter cause all members of the KKK are scumbags anyway.

269 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:15:19am

re: #261 Spiny Norman

The Klan, eh?

Curiously, there are still schools all over the Old South named after Nathan Bedford Forrest. Can anyone explain this to me?

Yup

[Link: video.google.com...]

270 shiek al beif salami  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:15:52am

re: #264 Adrenalyn

The ugliness of the opposition during the eight years of Clinton and the eight years of Bush.

271 Catttt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:15:56am

re: #216 Perplexed

When JFK was killed there were a few students celebrating the early news and this was at an elementary school. The military despised him.

There were children in my classroom that cheered when they got the news. Being Catholic myself, a big "enemy" sign with an arrow pointing down at them appeared over their heads at that point. The teacher was not in the room - he was busy comforting a female teacher in the hall, who was in tears. When he came in, he had us lower our heads and pray, saying he thought it appropriate irrespective of the Supreme Court.

272 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:15:57am

I read this link this morning - and it has rocked my world. It has opened my eyes like no other article I have read, about the meltdown.

The End of the Wall Street Boom

And short Eisman did—then he tried to get his mind around what he’d just done so he could do it better. He’d call over to a big firm and ask for a list of mortgage bonds from all over the country. The juiciest shorts—the bonds ultimately backed by the mortgages most likely to default—had several characteristics. They’d be in what Wall Street people were now calling the sand states: Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada. The loans would have been made by one of the more dubious mortgage lenders; Long Beach Financial, wholly owned by Washington Mutual, was a great example. Long Beach Financial was moving money out the door as fast as it could, few questions asked, in loans built to self-destruct. It specialized in asking home­owners with bad credit and no proof of income to put no money down and defer interest payments for as long as possible. In Bakersfield, California, a Mexican strawberry picker with an income of $14,000 and no English was lent every penny he needed to buy a house for $720,000.


More generally, the subprime market tapped a tranche of the American public that did not typically have anything to do with Wall Street. Lenders were making loans to people who, based on their credit ratings, were less creditworthy than 71 percent of the population. Eisman knew some of these people. One day, his housekeeper, a South American woman, told him that she was planning to buy a townhouse in Queens. “The price was absurd, and they were giving her a low-down-payment option-ARM,” says Eisman, who talked her into taking out a conventional fixed-rate mortgage. Next, the baby nurse he’d hired back in 1997 to take care of his newborn twin daughters phoned him. “She was this lovely woman from Jamaica,” he says. “One day she calls me and says she and her sister own five townhouses in Queens. I said, ‘How did that happen?’ ” It happened because after they bought the first one and its value rose, the lenders came and suggested they refinance and take out $250,000, which they used to buy another one. Then the price of that one rose too, and they repeated the experiment. “By the time they were done,” Eisman says, “they owned five of them, the market was falling, and they couldn’t make any of the payments.”
273 The Other Les  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:16:10am

re: #242 Spiny Norman

Wrong. Fake-but-accurate hogwash. Dan Rather (surprise!) reported this, claiming that they were celebrating Kennedy's assassination, but in reality, they were told they had the rest of the day off, but not why.

An early indication of the problem with Rather.

274 kynna  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:16:21am

I'm not completely surprised by this. I wonder what constitutes a 'threat' and if it has changed a bit -- if they're more sensitive because of race. Certainly many of the things written about George W. Bush -- even in the MSM -- could be deemed threatening. Were those pursued?

Just like an effigy of Sarah Palin hung by a noose is 'just a joke' but Obama's effigy hung by a noose is a hate crime -- could some of the uptick be a greater sensitivity?

The internet has made it easy for people to say things off the top of their heads, in the heat of the moment, and some of those things might be said very, very poorly. People do need to rediscover civil discourse, IMO. I wish they'd started back in 2000, but today is as good a day as any to get going on that.

275 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:16:28am

re: #242 Spiny Norman

We were around 98% military brats at that school.

276 SixDegrees  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:16:40am

re: #239 Charles

In case anyone really thinks there aren't people who want to promote this stuff -- I've received two emails now from a banned user who's outraged that I wouldn't let him talk about assassination here.

And I know for a fact that this article is not exaggerated. Not one bit.

Again: I have no doubt that the actual incidents cited are very real. I question, though, the assertion that they're any worse now than they have been in the past. Over the last several years, I could visit the DK or DU any time, any day and find overt death threats against any number of Republicans; they only thing that varied was who, in particular, had been in the news that week.

That sort of vilification has continued over there well past the election, too, with Sarah Palin in the news quite regularly. The response to her, McCain and others is filled with the same rabid hatred and calls for violence that have boiled forth from the Left for years.

A more balanced article would have noted that this is not a disease that infects only one side.

277 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:16:41am

re: #239 Charles

In case anyone really thinks there aren't people who want to promote this stuff -- I've received two emails now from a banned user who's outraged that I wouldn't let him talk about assassination here.

And I know for a fact that this article is not exaggerated. Not one bit.

Makes me wonder if they are pro- or anti- assassination.

No, not really.

This article is what the media should have been reporting since 2001 and didn't, credible threats against the Republic.

278 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:16:55am

re: #261 Spiny Norman

The Klan, eh?

Curiously, there are still schools all over the Old South named after Nathan Bedford Forrest. Can anyone explain this to me?

I'm still waiting for someone to tell me how we had prayer in public school in Jimmy Carter's Georgia when I was young

and why the separate bathrooms and water fountains for blacks

I wonder if Clinton's Arkansas had the same things

279 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:17:16am

re: #256 anotherindyfilmguy

I think it was Strauss who forwarded the idea that, for a nation states to work, it must possess a monopoly on political violence and the threat of using political violence.

These threats violate that monopoly and are a threat against the country as a whole. They should be taken very seriously.

280 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:17:22am
281 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:17:40am

re: #263 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Yeah. But Walter did it on purpose.

Well, I could be cavalier and say your right, planned the whole thing out, from riches to rags, but really, shit happened and as a conservative, I don't tend to whine and I don't tend to look for a handout. I adjusted as needed.

If the right full time job offer came along, I be on it like a lefty to Madeline Albrights undies.

282 notutopia  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:17:41am

re: #192 NoSubmission

I think you are implying that President Obama ran for this office (with his family) and did NOT know that he would be put in harms way by extremists of both the left and the right.

He and his family will be well protected. As has Bush's.

What we are coming to accept here is that THERE are these lunatics amongst
our society that do not ascribe to logic or law or morals. They ascribe to raw hate that holds no bounds for any value. Not even LIFE. When one no longer
values their OWN life, then others reap their cowardous actions which are actually the inability to self extinguish their own dreaded life.
HATE is the far end of the emotional gradient of dislike.

283 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:18:26am

re: #268 realwest
Huh, "The original Ku Klux Klan created in the aftermath of the American Civil War by six educated, middle-class Confederate veterans on December 24, 1865.[7] from Pulaski, Tennessee."
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

284 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:18:54am
285 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:19:08am

There are maybe more people of my race (white) than I want to admit that still hold onto racism and racists thought. But, I would say that as a group, whites have exhibited an extraordinary degree of tolerance over the past 50 years. We are far from the total erasure of such thoughts, but I would put the transformation of "White America" up against any other ethnic and racial group in modern history. It's hasn't even been 50 years since "separate, but equal" was still the law of the land in many parts of the the USA.

Now, the last thing any white person wants to be called is a racist. That is a one way ticket to oblivion. The USA is a flawed and imperfect place, but you would have to look very hard to find a society trying with all their might to get to a place where content of character always trumps skin color.

We have to be vigilant and get these haters out in the open for all to see. I have noticed most of them are cowards and prefer to hide in the shadows with other spineless vermin.

286 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:19:39am

re: #261 Spiny Norman

The Klan, eh?

Curiously, there are still schools all over the Old South named after Nathan Bedford Forrest. Can anyone explain this to me?

Forrest was a military and tactical genius. His cavalry caused all kinds of havoc for the Union. His tactics are used to this day by the US Army.

287 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:20:04am

re: #281 Walter L. Newton

Howabout...

"Well, Walter accepted it with grace."

288 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:20:32am

re: #272 DistantThunder

also, don't forget the "CDS" scheme
"invented" by JP Morgan in 1997
just before they became JPmorganchase
(while D Bill Bradley was Chairman)
as a way to insure against stock losses

those are a bigger piece of the meltdown pie
and again, firmly traceable to democrats
and again, blocked from daylight by said same party

289 zelnaga[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:20:46am
290 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:20:51am

re: #286 jcm

Forrest was a military and tactical genius. His cavalry caused all kinds of havoc for the Union. His tactics are used to this day by the US Army.

And that was the point the poster was trying to make as the stick was descending upon his stupid head.

291 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:21:04am

re: #287 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Howabout...

"Well, Walter accepted it with grace."

Yes. Precisely. And thanks for the support.

292 debutaunt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:21:43am

re: #242 Spiny Norman

Wrong. Fake-but-accurate hogwash. Dan Rather (surprise!) reported this, claiming that they were celebrating Kennedy's assassination, but in reality, they were told they had the rest of the day off, but not why.

Dan Rather didn't have a big enough story - good lord.

293 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:21:55am

re: #289 zelnaga

Who is BK?

Bobby Kennedy and General Motors.

294 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:22:18am

re: #280 DistantThunder

The End of the Wall Street Boom

The funny thing, looking back on it, is how long it took for even someone who predicted the disaster to grasp its root causes. They were learning about this on the fly, shorting the bonds and then trying to figure out what they had done. Eisman knew subprime lenders could be scumbags. What he underestimated was the total unabashed complicity of the upper class of American capitalism. For instance, he knew that the big Wall Street investment banks took huge piles of loans that in and of themselves might be rated BBB, threw them into a trust, carved the trust into tranches, and wound up with 60 percent of the new total being rated AAA.

But he couldn’t figure out exactly how the rating agencies justified turning BBB loans into AAA-rated bonds. “I didn’t understand how they were turning all this garbage into gold,” he says. He brought some of the bond people from Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, and UBS over for a visit. “We always asked the same question,” says Eisman. “Where are the rating agencies in all of this? And I’d always get the same reaction. It was a smirk.” He called Standard & Poor’s and asked what would happen to default rates if real estate prices fell. The man at S&P couldn’t say; its model for home prices had no ability to accept a negative number. “They were just assuming home prices would keep going up,” Eisman says.

295 notutopia  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:22:22am

re: #213 Quilly Mammoth
But you think Obamas haters are ALL racists?

296 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:22:43am

re: #271 Catttt

There were children in my classroom that cheered when they got the news. Being Catholic myself, a big "enemy" sign with an arrow pointing down at them appeared over their heads at that point. The teacher was not in the room - he was busy comforting a female teacher in the hall, who was in tears. When he came in, he had us lower our heads and pray, saying he thought it appropriate irrespective of the Supreme Court.

We had a moment of silence to do whatever. Teachers were pretty grim at that point. Stupid kids thought that the TDYs would stop and dads would stay safe at home with Kennedy gone. At that point a couple kids had already been pulled from school because their father had been killed in a SEA TDY.

297 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:22:47am

re: #292 debutaunt

Dan Rather didn't have a big enough story - good lord.

Did he have a "memo" showing the kids celebrating?

298 Walter L. Newton[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:22:54am
299 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:23:26am

re: #289 zelnaga

BK= Bobby Kennedy

300 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:23:28am

re: #291 Walter L. Newton

By the way, if it was just me? surviving on 20K'd be a snap.

Dang wife and kids with their...

"I want to eat!"
"I want to live inside of a house!"
"I have to go the doctor!"

Sheesh, what was I thinking.

301 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:23:50am

re: #290 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

And that was the point the poster was trying to make as the stick was descending upon his stupid head.

Well, I'm not using the name as nic, and I can recognize the military genius of a racist piece of trash.

302 Dasher  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:24:27am

It is a sorry state this country is in. It is too bad that Obama is getting threats. We have had such a calm period the past eight years, with nary a ill word against our current president.

//

303 FurryOldGuyJeans[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:24:30am
304 jamie  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:24:40am

re: #282 notutopia

He and his family will be well protected. As has Bush's.

What we are coming to accept here is that THERE are these lunatics amongst
our society that do not ascribe to logic or law or morals. They ascribe to raw hate that holds no bounds for any value. Not even LIFE. When one no longer
values their OWN life, then others reap their cowardous actions which are actually the inability to self extinguish their own dreaded life.
HATE is the far end of the emotional gradient of dislike.

If there is one benefit of the manifestation of hate we've witnessed from the world's terrorists, it's that they haven't managed to even get close to our leaders. I'm less fearful for Obama than most, in large part because the world's greatest filth--the Hamases, Hezbollahs, and al-Qaedas of the world--have wanted nothing more than a dead POTUS since their inception. They'd probably give away Mecca to kill President Bush, and unlike some inbred pieces of shit in the white separatist community--they have significant means by which to carry out such an objective. Their lack of success indicates that some Idaho skinhead is going to be no match for the Secret Service.

305 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:25:12am

re: #300 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

By the way, if it was just me? surviving on 20K'd be a snap.

Dang wife and kids with their...

"I want to eat!"
"I want to live inside of a house!"
"I have to go the doctor!"

Sheesh, what was I thinking.

LOL. No kids ever. Had 4 wife's, each time, just gave them everything, made it easier.

306 vapig  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:25:17am

re: #253 shiek al beif salami

I despise the cult of personality that surrounds Obama, but I do not despise him as a man.

I do. As a man he CHOSE to surround himself with every American hating whack-job out there. He CHOSE his ideology and he CHOSE what kind of person he was to become and I despise him for his wish to force feed the rest of us with it whether we wish it or not. I just don't want him harmed for it. He's as free to be an asshole as I am (for the time being) to resist his CHANGE!

307 Voton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:25:20am

The left have been saying for years, "Watch, someone's gonna shoot him," and the sort of people who might want to shoot him will inevitably respond to that. The lefties would love him as a martyr, even more so than as President.

308 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:25:30am

re: #303 FurryOldGuyJeans

I have done history research by newspaper archive, and it most certainly happened with LBJ. Quite a number of things domestic policy-wise the man proposed were touted as a JFK policy and passed without serious opposition.

except when Al Gore Sr. filibustered Civil Rights

309 MandyManners  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:25:50am

re: #304 jamie

If there is one benefit of the manifestation of hate we've witnessed from the world's terrorists, it's that they haven't managed to even get close to our leaders. I'm less fearful for Obama than most, in large part because the world's greatest filth--the Hamases, Hezbollahs, and al-Qaedas of the world--have wanted nothing more than a dead POTUS since their inception. They'd probably give away Mecca to kill President Bush, and unlike some inbred pieces of shit in the white separatist community--they have significant means by which to carry out such an objective. Their lack of success indicates that some Idaho skinhead is going to be no match for the Secret Service.

Not all Nazis look like Nazis.

310 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:26:10am

re: #288 Adrenalyn

also, don't forget the "CDS" scheme
"invented" by JP Morgan in 1997
just before they became JPmorganchase
(while D Bill Bradley was Chairman)
as a way to insure against stock losses

Eisman’s willingness to be abrasive in order to get to the heart of the matter was obvious to all; what was harder to see was his credulity: He actually wanted to believe in the system. As quick as he was to cry bullshit when he saw it, he was still shocked by bad behavior. That night in Vegas, he was seated at dinner beside a really nice guy who invested in mortgage C.D.O.’s—collateralized debt obligations. By then, Eisman thought he knew what he needed to know about C.D.O.’s. He didn’t, it turned out.

Later, when I sit down with Eisman, the very first thing he wants to explain is the importance of the mezzanine C.D.O. What you notice first about Eisman is his lips. He holds them pursed, waiting to speak. The second thing you notice is his short, light hair, cropped in a manner that suggests he cut it himself while thinking about something else. “You have to understand this,” he says. “This was the engine of doom.” Then he draws a picture of several towers of debt. The first tower is made of the original subprime loans that had been piled together. At the top of this tower is the AAA tranche, just below it the AA tranche, and so on down to the riskiest, the BBB tranche—the bonds Eisman had shorted. But Wall Street had used these BBB tranches—the worst of the worst—to build yet another tower of bonds: a “particularly egregious” C.D.O. The reason they did this was that the rating agencies, presented with the pile of bonds backed by dubious loans, would pronounce most of them AAA. These bonds could then be sold to investors—pension funds, insurance companies—who were allowed to invest only in highly rated securities. “I cannot fucking believe this is allowed—I must have said that a thousand times in the past two years,” Eisman says.

311 Shug  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:26:18am

re: #289 zelnaga

Remember the LA riots?

extrapolate that all across America in your little "boon for the left" scenario.
It won't be pretty

312 caligal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:26:35am

on one hand I want things to go well for him because he will be in the office of US President. But, then I think about how the MSM/and folks have treated GWB and their utter contempt for him and this administration and figure it would be satisfying to see them give comparable abuse to the new guy...but will they?

313 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:26:45am

re: #301 jcm

Well, I'm not using the name as nic, and I can recognize the military genius of a racist piece of trash.

Oh, of course. Obviously, my comment wasn't well written. Charles was like "dude?"

It was funny. Was not attacking you for noting NBF's military expertise. If you took it that way, oops on me.

314 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:27:56am

re: #305 Walter L. Newton
FOUR WIVES?!? Uh, geez Walter, I had two and learned my lesson!

315 kynna  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:28:12am

re: #298 Walter L. Newton

I certainly don't mind NOT talking about the substance of the article posted (assassination of a US president is an awful and depressing topic), but I think Zelnaga is making the point that anyone on the right who thinks they'll achieve their desired goals by such an act is pathetically mistaken and the reverse would happen.

It'd be nice if those Tim McVeighs in waiting would understand that fact. To shush someone making the point seems unhelpful.

316 FurryOldGuyJeans  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:28:15am

re: #308 Adrenalyn

except when Al Gore Sr. filibustered Civil Rights

I didn't say EVERYTHING LBJ proposed was touted as a JFK policy, only those that he thought might be tough sells. He miscalculated a lot, as it turned out.

317 ArmyWife  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:28:34am

re: #35 Killgore Trout

How pleasant. What is wrong with these people? I thought it was sick when people did this to President Bush and it is equally sick with President Elect Obama.

318 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:28:56am

I have to go see if I can jump start my personal economy. Been crappy as of late. But still much better than most.

Thank you President Elect Obama.

/

319 gymnast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:29:05am

Did you hear the one about the bus load of chanting grade school kids from Rexburg Idaho? It is reported under the "Most Commented" section on todays Idaho Statesman website. The comments sections and some of the Dems comments are most instructive. Read it yourself and make up your own mind.

320 Desert Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:29:07am

Eddie Murphy and the First Black President

Lot of MF's and Reagan bashing in there, but still funny.......but, in a way, if the report above is correct...a little too close to the truth, eh?

321 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:29:09am

The End of Wall Street Boom

His dinner companion in Las Vegas ran a fund of about $15 billion and managed C.D.O.’s backed by the BBB tranche of a mortgage bond, or as Eisman puts it, “the equivalent of three levels of dog shit lower than the original bonds.”

FrontPoint had spent a lot of time digging around in the dog shit and knew that the default rates were already sufficient to wipe out this guy’s entire portfolio. “God, you must be having a hard time,” Eisman told his dinner companion.

“No,” the guy said, “I’ve sold everything out.”

After taking a fee, he passed them on to other investors. His job was to be the C.D.O. “expert,” but he actually didn’t spend any time at all thinking about what was in the C.D.O.’s. “He managed the C.D.O.’s,” says Eisman, “but managed what? I was just appalled. People would pay up to have someone manage their C.D.O.’s—as if this moron was helping you. I thought, You prick, you don’t give a fuck about the investors in this thing.”

322 imtoast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:29:37am

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

323 Catttt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:29:55am

re: #305 Walter L. Newton

LOL. No kids ever. Had 4 wife's, each time, just gave them everything, made it easier.

Four! One at a time, right? /;D

324 Quilly Mammoth  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:30:04am

re: #295 notutopia

But you think Obamas haters are ALL racists?

No, not even most.

325 the other Amy  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:30:11am

#289 Who is BK?

My guess, Bobby Kennedy. Although, when I hear BK I think of Burger King.....

326 Meremortal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:30:13am

OT, with apologies.
I'm looking for a little help, lizards. Can anyone provide a link about the subject of Islamist radicals not wearing ties because they are considered a Christian/Crusader symbol? Remember when Admandinejad released the Brit navy hostages some months back, he gave them suits to wear but no ties? He doesn't wear a tie with his suits either. I googled but didn't come up with anything. Thanks in advance if you can help.

MM

327 Kulhwch  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:30:40am

re: #2 UberInfidel67

I call BS. So now he is gonna play the victim card? Blah.

I concurr.  As long as its:

The Secret Service would not comment or provide the number of cases they are investigating.

... or:

But since the Nov. 4 election, law enforcement officials have seen more potentially threatening writings, Internet postings and other activity directed at Obama than has been seen with any past president-elect, said officials aware of the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity because the issue of a president’s security is so sensitive.

... its merely hearsay.

    But it is a cleaver ploy, though.  He can play the victim card, escallate it into the race card, and if none of that works well enough, segue into a perfect reason for more strident gun control.  And he's only got millions of moonbat sycophants out there to watch and listen for him ... welcome to the end of free speech ... brought to you by the gentle fascists on the left.

}:)     [Have you lovingly turned you brother, your spouse, your child in today for gentle reconditioning?]

328 caligal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:30:49am

re: #271 Catttt

I too remember a few cheers when in high school... guess I am a bit older than you... think some families were john birchers..

329 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:30:52am

re: #326 Meremortal

Shit. I'll have to start wearing ties then.

330 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:31:21am

re: #322 imtoast

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

I liken it to Papa Doc Duvalier's Tonton Macoutes. Unconstitutional and very, very dangerous to our entire country.

331 Killgore Trout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:31:46am

re: #322 imtoast

It ain't gonna happen. Obama is not going to become a Stalinist dictator and there will be no military coup or overthrow of the government by some militia.

332 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:31:50am
333 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:32:16am

re: #313 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Oh, of course. Obviously, my comment wasn't well written. Charles was like "dude?"

It was funny. Was not attacking you for noting NBF's military expertise. If you took it that way, oops on me.

I took it as a friendly warning... Thanks.

I tend to look at admire and separate the military aspect of historical figures from the whole picture.

334 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:33:24am

re: #322 imtoast

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

Oh please. Obama is not talking about some home militia that would have enough power to overthrow the US military.

I am not for his idea of a civil militia, but please, stop over reacting and read up on Gendarme's. There are MANY cicil militia's in MANY countries, and they are not in any position to overthrow the country.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

I think this kind of paranoia is as bad as comparing Obama to you know who!

Stop it.

335 proud to be an infidel  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:33:50am

People, there is no reason whatsoever to believe that these news stories about Obama being the most threatened President-elect are not true and accurate. Particularly if they come from credible news sources. There are some extreme people in this country AND in the world so it is not unusual at all for one of them to want to eliminate America's first bi-racial President. Tiger Woods gets death threats on a fairly frequent basis so why would it be any different for Obama?

Listen, I didn't vote for Obama and I disagreed with most of what he stood for BUT whether we like it or not, Obama will be OUR President and MY President. And quite frankly, a successful Obama Presidency will only benefit ME and most Americans. So we really need to pray for his safety and give him a credible chance to perhaps become the next democratic version of Ronald Reagan. But if he flops, then we'll have a chance to vote him out of office in 2012.

336 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:33:56am

The End of the Wall Street Boom

Whatever rising anger Eisman felt was offset by the man’s genial disposition. Not only did he not mind that Eisman took a dim view of his C.D.O.’s; he saw it as a basis for friendship. “Then he said something that blew my mind,” Eisman tells me. “He says, ‘I love guys like you who short my market. Without you, I don’t have anything to buy.’ ”

That’s when Eisman finally got it. Here he’d been making these side bets with Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank on the fate of the BBB tranche without fully understanding why those firms were so eager to make the bets. Now he saw. There weren’t enough Americans with shitty credit taking out loans to satisfy investors’ appetite for the end product. The firms used Eisman’s bet to synthesize more of them. Here, then, was the difference between fantasy finance and fantasy football: When a fantasy player drafts Peyton Manning, he doesn’t create a second Peyton Manning to inflate the league’s stats. But when Eisman bought a credit-default swap, he enabled Deutsche Bank to create another bond identical in every respect but one to the original. The only difference was that there was no actual homebuyer or borrower. The only assets backing the bonds were the side bets Eisman and others made with firms like Goldman Sachs. Eisman, in effect, was paying to Goldman the interest on a subprime mortgage. In fact, there was no mortgage at all. “They weren’t satisfied getting lots of unqualified borrowers to borrow money to buy a house they couldn’t afford,” Eisman says. “They were creating them out of whole cloth. One hundred times over! That’s why the losses are so much greater than the loans. But that’s when I realized they needed us to keep the machine running. I was like, This is allowed?”

I can't stop thinking about how insane this is - that our financial class became so delusional and complicit with our political class - and have created absolute chaos in our economy.

337 gman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:34:10am

re: #322 imtoast

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

You forgot the sarc tag

338 FightingBack  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:34:25am

re: #256 anotherindyfilmguy

We're talking about violent threats against the POTUS-elect here. I'm sorry if I was unclear?
I suppose that Law Enforcement and the Military are actually armed to "threaten violence" but that's not what I meant. I was alluding to some domestic bombers, and, particularly, one group of them, whose advocacy of, and use of, domestic violence escaped the notice of BHO, by his own admission.

339 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:34:26am

re: #323 Catttt

Four! One at a time, right? /;D

Oh shit, are you telling me I could have had them at the same time? I always miss out on the fun.

340 notutopia  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:34:35am

re: #304 jamie

Jetliner into the pentagon is not close enough?
The skinheads are not just in Idaho.
The suits with groomed hair that are operating in our society are of equal concern.
Face it Hatefilled EXTREMISTS are all loose cannons.

341 Meremortal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:35:05am

re: #329 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Shit. I'll have to start wearing ties then.


*
Yes, finally there is a good reason to wear a tie. Who'd a thought?

342 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:35:20am

re: #322 imtoast

There is no way Obama is going to "try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country". He may try to bring in a socialist policy or 8 (national health care ,,,, expanded social programs ,, etc etc). But you will not see Gulags. You will not see mandatory Red Stars on 'party apparatchiks' clothing.

343 vapig  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:35:42am

re: #309 MandyManners

Not all Nazis look like Nazis.

Doesn't matter - they're pretty thorough with background checks. You don't pass you don't get close.

344 NoSubmission  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:36:09am

re: #326 Meremortal
I think it was only Dinnerjacket's edict to not wear ties because they are 'Western', not all Islamic radicals. Sorry for the lack of linkage...

345 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:36:36am

re: #334 Walter L. Newton
Excellent and Spot on Post Walter!
Besides which, the oath everyone takes upon entering military service states that they will obey orders [lawful under the UCMJ] and defend the Constitution (not the POTUS) against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

346 shiek al beif salami  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:36:47am

re: #319 gymnast

Do you have the link?

347 Meremortal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:37:20am

re: #344 NoSubmission

I think it was only Dinnerjacket's edict to not wear ties because they are 'Western', not all Islamic radicals. Sorry for the lack of linkage...


+
Thank you. I wish I could figure out where I read about tie symbolism and Islam.

348 DistantThunder  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:37:50am

re: #334 Walter L. Newton

Oh please. Obama is not talking about some home militia that would have enough power to overthrow the US military.

I am not for his idea of a civil militia, but please, stop over reacting and read up on Gendarme's. There are MANY cicil militia's in MANY countries, and they are not in any position to overthrow the country.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

I think this kind of paranoia is as bad as comparing Obama to you know who!

Stop it.

If the spouse comes home from work and says "I've just purchased 5 highly trained attack doberman pinschers" - the other spouse has as right to be suspicious and ask why?

Why do we need them?
Why is this important to do now?
What are you afraid of?
What bad things will happen if we don't have them?
What bad things will happen if we do keep them?
How can i assured that they won't attack me?

349 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:38:42am

re: #338 FightingBack

We're talking about violent threats against the POTUS-elect here. I'm sorry if I was unclear?
I suppose that Law Enforcement and the Military are actually armed to "threaten violence" but that's not what I meant. I was alluding to some domestic bombers, and, particularly, one group of them, whose advocacy of, and use of, domestic violence escaped the notice of BHO, by his own admission.

Blanket statements can become slippery slopes.

350 Steffan  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:39:03am

re: #149 Nevergiveup

A thread like this really depresses me. Any way I hope Navy beat ND today.

Box score: 2nd quarter, Navy 7, ND 7.

Hmmm. Fox Sports had this:

Notre Dame is looking for revenge against Navy. Hard to believe after more than four decades of dominance by the Fighting Irish against the Midshipmen, but that's the case heading into Saturday's game.

Navy ended its record-setting 43-game losing streak to Notre Dame last season with a thrilling 46-43 victory in triple-overtime last season.

Now the question is: Can Navy do it again?

"Why not? Let's start a streak for us," Navy fullback Eric Kettani said.

Navy has not defeated Notre Dame two years in a row since 1960-61 when Wayne Hardin was coach. The Midshipmen went 5-3 against the Fighting Irish from 1956 through 1963.

Notre Dame dominated college football's longest continuous intersectional rivalry for the next four decades most often by lopsided scores, though six times the difference was a touchdown or less.

Navy finally put an end to the longest losing streak to one opponent in college football history in 2007, when linebacker Irv Spencer led a host of teammates in stopping Notre Dame tailback Travis Thomas on a 2-point conversion attempt that would've forced a fourth OT.

In a spontaneous display of joy, the Navy players and coaches stormed the field at Notre Dame Stadium in wild celebration before a stunned crowd of 80,795 fans.

Why would they tolerate such a losing streak? Were they getting ready to deal with Congress?

351 gymnast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:39:04am

A bus load of kids to be investigated by the Secret Service? [Link: www.idahostatesman.com...]

352 Kulhwch  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:39:10am

re: #12 sattv4u2

The Secret Service would not comment or provide the number of cases they are investigating.

I think this is the wrong way to go. I think they should publicize each and every instance to show how vigilant they are, how even 2 whack-jobs plotting amongst themselves will be caught, tried, convicted and punished. It won't stop every othre whack job from trying, but I'll bet it will make many re-think it.

And it would be the only way we could tell that they're telling the truth, agreed.  After all, remember how many islamofascists Moslems claimed that there were threats to the islamofascist Moslem community and then the FBI records, et al, showed it to be a great lie?  Then remember how Obama's whole campaign was settled on lies, evasions, and deception.

}:)     [I'm packing my gulag overnight bag early, just in case.]

353 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:39:26am

re: #345 realwest

Excellent and Spot on Post Walter!
Besides which, the oath everyone takes upon entering military service states that they will obey orders [lawful under the UCMJ] and defend the Constitution (not the POTUS) against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Thanks. I swear, do people not know what is going on in the world. Guess what folks, those quaint guys called the Royal Mounted Police, yea, well that's a civil militia. Haven't seen Dudley Doright's (sp?) trying to take over Canada yet, have we.

Geeeessshhh...

354 imtoast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:40:20am

re: #330 Perplexed

I liken it to Papa Doc Duvalier's Tonton Macoutes. Unconstitutional and very, very dangerous to our entire country.

That's what I was afraid of, thank you.

355 Shr_Nfr  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:40:50am

re: #322 imtoast

Given that there already exist the civilian militia in the form of the national guard, I do not think the POTUS is constitutionally entitled to form a 3rd one. Section II Article II only speaks to the executive branch being the commander in chief of the standard military and national guard. An unarmed force such as the WPA probably rises to the necessary level of compelling state interest to be allowed to exist. A 3rd armed one does not. It was certainly not founders intent that there should be a private Praetorian Guard to be formed by the POTUS.

356 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:41:36am

re: #263 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Yeah. But Walter did it on purpose.

Me too - future tense. It serves several purposes.

357 quickjustice  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:41:56am

For those of you who are paranoid that Obama is a Stalinist, get over it. He's successfully gotten himself elected President of the U.S. using different tactics. His victory was decisive (meaning outside the margins for electoral fraud, although I've no doubt that fraud occurred).

Why should he switch to different tactics, unless the ones he currently employs fail him? And if he resorts to oppressive government, the American people will figure it out quickly.

Few remember how extreme FDR's "brain trust" was. These were people who drew on Mussolini's Fascist Italy for their ideas in structuring the New Deal. And the New Deal failed. So Obama can swing pretty far left before he equals the oppression of the New Deal.

358 Catttt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:42:18am

OT, but related in a way

Groceries just delivered. The fellow who carried them in is from Mali. I told him I was glad he was here in America. He totally beamed at me and thanked me. I tipped him too (I always tip), but I think it was the "welcome to America" part that caused the smile.

Any minute now, I'm going to start quoting Emma Lazarus....

he New Colossus

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Emma Lazarus, 1883

359 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:42:20am

re: #348 DistantThunder

If the spouse comes home from work and says "I've just purchased 5 highly trained attack doberman pinschers" - the other spouse has as right to be suspicious and ask why?

Why do we need them?
Why is this important to do now?
What are you afraid of?
What bad things will happen if we don't have them?
What bad things will happen if we do keep them?
How can i assured that they won't attack me?

Did you read my link? Did you read about ALL the other civil militia's around the world? Have you ever seen ANY of these civil militia's at work, in another country?

Have you ever heard of State Police? Just stop it. As I said, I don't want a full blown civil militia in this country. We already have the National Guard, reserves, state police etc.

But, what Obama is talking about is NOT some brown shirts or SS or anything like that.

360 imtoast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:42:20am

re: #331 Killgore Trout

It ain't gonna happen. Obama is not going to become a Stalinist dictator and there will be no military coup or overthrow of the government by some militia.

That wasn't really my question. I wanted to know about our military. They take an oath to uphold the Constitution. What happens to them if, and I say IF, Obama does try a coup? Afterall, Obama will be the Commander in Chief.

361 Boogberg  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:43:04am

re: #305 Walter L. Newton

LOL. No kids ever. Had 4 wife's, each time, just gave them everything, made it easier.

Sam Kinison:

"After my second divorce I though: Hey! Maybe if I learn how to fuck really good, I won't have to give away everything I own every FIVE FUCKING YEARS! OH OOOOOOGH! :D

362 gman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:43:46am

re: #348 DistantThunder

If the spouse comes home from work and says "I've just purchased 5 highly trained attack doberman pinschers" - the other spouse has as right to be suspicious and ask why?

Why do we need them?
Why is this important to do now?
What are you afraid of?
What bad things will happen if we don't have them?
What bad things will happen if we do keep them?
How can i assured that they won't attack me?

I'm intrigued. What are the symbolic Obama "highly trained attack doberman pinschers"?

363 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:43:59am

re: #353 Walter L. Newton
Yup, but ya know what - I can't see ANY civilian milita that Obama may want, which would have oh, say, an Air Force or a Navy and that sort of thing.
And geez, he said it in an off-hand remark - it isn't part of the "Office Of The President-Elect"'s stated plans.
Although I do think this Office of the President Elect is just a bit much, ya know?! LOL!

364 notutopia  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:44:04am

Keep the logic going... Got chores? I do..need to go do them. BBL.

365 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:44:21am

re: #356 legalpad

Me too - future tense. It serves several purposes.

FVB stands corrected. I didn't start the downward spiral on purpose. But when I saw what was happening, I turned it to my advantage. I didn't fight it, downsized a lot, took the hits I did, didn't get depressed, cleaned up my unhealthy habits and kept fighting.

I'm ok now.

366 caligal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:45:07am

isn't it ironic that one must totally scrutinized to potentially work in the new administration...including delving into blog notations, considering the ties that the president to be had... w/wright, ayers et al. guess it was okay for him but not for staff.

367 Conservative in Liberal Hands  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:45:22am

I suspected that there was a very high number of threats against the President-elect. From my reading - and decidedly not from personal experience - the Secret Service rarely makes public threats or for that manner very much about their protective efforts.

G-d bless the brave and dedicated men and women who make up the United States Secret Service and their fellow Treasury Agents, too - The USSS is part of the Treasury Dept.

368 Spare O'Lake  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:45:46am

There is no shortage of crazies and racists in America, but it would be interesting if it could be measured whether the increased threats against BHO are racially motivated in similar proportion to the racial character of his campaign strategy.
Which is not to excuse ANY threats against the President Elect, racial or otherwise.

369 imtoast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:45:46am

re: #334 Walter L. Newton

Oh please. Obama is not talking about some home militia that would have enough power to overthrow the US military.

I am not for his idea of a civil militia, but please, stop over reacting and read up on Gendarme's. There are MANY cicil militia's in MANY countries, and they are not in any position to overthrow the country.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

I think this kind of paranoia is as bad as comparing Obama to you know who!

Stop it.

Please don't give me the moniker of Paranoia. I am asking a question regarding our military. Let me put it as a hypothetical question. I am curious about our military, where they would be if there were an attempted coup.

370 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:46:10am
371 monkeytime  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:46:27am

I think Obama has surrounded himself with enough shady people to warrant a bit of healthy skepticism. We can only base our opinions on what will happen next by what has happened in the past. When we ask ourselves "Who is this person" we look at what they do, what they have done, who are their friends and associates and so on. Let's face it, he hung around with radicals, terrorists, extremists and so on. That being said, he is our President now. I pray daily for his judgment and safety.

372 Max Darkside  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:46:34am

Sorry for the drive by posting...

The Secret Service would not comment or provide the number of cases ...said officials aware of the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity

Let's see, "seeing more against Barack Obama than ever before" but they don't know how many and no one will admit to knowing.

I call Bull Sh*t!

/driving onward...

373 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:46:47am

re: #365 Walter L. Newton
"I'm ok now."
We'll be the judge of THAT!

;')

374 quickjustice  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:46:57am

re: #360 imtoast

It's only a "coup" if someone tries to overthrow the lawfully elected government of the U.S. For now, Obama will be lawfully elected when the electors of the states meet.

If Obama were to violate the Constitution by disbanding Congress, for example, then we'd have civil war. But why should he do that? Congress is of his party. At the federal level, the judiciary is all we will have for the next three or four years.

Focus on electing good people to your state government, and to Congress. A lot.

375 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:47:05am

re: #366 caligal

isn't it ironic that one must totally scrutinized to potentially work in the new administration...including delving into blog notations, considering the ties that the president to be had... w/wright, ayers et al. guess it was okay for him but not for staff.

Oh come on. Every fucking administration has vetting processes. Have you ever had any sort of government security clearance? I've had jobs where they know what I'm hiding in my asshole.

This is a NOTHING ISSUE. You are acting just like a KosKid.

376 RememberSekhmet?  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:47:14am

Hussein the Twit will likely self-LART, and gods willing, be laughed out of office in 4 years. I don't like what we're gonna get the four years, but this is what the alleged "independent thinkers" all voted in lockstep for.

Nobody needs to threaten anything but his political career.

377 proud to be an infidel  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:48:12am

re: #332 taxfreekiller

The current Democrat Party which is headed up by Pres. elect Obama
is issuing death threats by the hour on all the troops in Iraq, on our constitution, on each of you reading this thread, it being they will hand our country over to the likes of Hugo Chavez of Venzoolala land in time if we do not win this fight to the death. They have accepted by this vote the ideas and policies of William Ayers by the act of not dealing with the truth of his past, they hide behind the mask of our system and plot

your deaths, your children's death, the death of the men in Iraq or any where on earth or here at home where we defend our constitution and lives and honor, my self I have accepted the challenge they have put down before me, now all must chose the path of truth or the path of
not accepting the truth of the condition your eyes and ears present you.

like that, its real this real and present danger

Oh please stop with this nonsense. This is as bad as the loony left saying that Bush murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and that he's taking away ALL our freedoms.

378 caligal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:48:31am

re: #375 Walter L. Newton

actually yes, I have been vetted and cleared!

379 Catttt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:48:37am

Five dobermans....

Maybe the guy is starting a bank robbing company.......

380 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:49:35am

re: #376 RememberSekhmet?

che la fa significa ,,, "SELF-LART" ?

381 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:49:39am

re: #359 Walter L. Newton

But, what Obama is talking about is NOT some brown shirts or SS or anything like that.

Walter, I've got to disagree with you on this one. Would you show me the Constitutional justification for having a group like this? How would this group be funded? What Constitutional guarantees would we have against this group? Why start the group in the first place? We have local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. We have a military. What would the scope of this group be in relationship to the American people?

382 shiek al beif salami  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:49:51am

re: #351 gymnast

The sad part is that if these kids had chanted the same thing about George Bush, few would have commented on it.

This week, one of my professor gave a pass to the atrocities committed by Soviet communists, so I asked her what she would think if someone said the same thing about the Nazis. Her response was that the communists were trying to create a better world.

383 gman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:50:09am

Looks like the militia- types are coming out of the woodwork

384 Kulhwch  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:50:25am

re: #351 gymnast

A bus load of kids to be investigated by the Secret Service? [Link: www.idahostatesman.com...]

Whoops:

404 Page Not Found
Unfortunately we are unable to locate the page you have requested. This could be due to content on our site having expired, a broken link, an outdated bookmark, or a mistyped address. Please use the navigation provided on this page, or click here to visit our home page.

Must remind myself: the media is slippery ... always do a screen capture and then copy the text to another document in case someone 'decides' to get rid of the evidence ...

}:)     [Just my personal code, you understand ... ]

385 imtoast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:50:33am

re: #345 realwest

Excellent and Spot on Post Walter!
Besides which, the oath everyone takes upon entering military service states that they will obey orders [lawful under the UCMJ] and defend the Constitution (not the POTUS) against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Thank you realwest, that was what I was looking for. My daughter is in the Air Force and I suppose I could call her for more information. I just wanted to know where our military stands. My concern is more regarding our military personnel than an actual takeover by Obama. I don't know that much about how the military works, though I know that I should.

386 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:50:40am
387 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:52:09am

re: #378 caligal

actually yes, I have been vetted and cleared!

Ok, then you are making an issue out of nothing and you know it. You sound just like someone with BDS.

I knew that if Obama got elected, we would see our own conservatives turn into little KosKids.

I hope LGF's doesn't become a dumping site for conservatives that lack critical thinking skills.

388 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:53:45am

re: #386 taxfreekiller

imtoast

Understand, no one will ever know what the top of the Navy ect. thinks about this, should they act, the orders will be oral orders only and no one will even know who was involved ever, not to the end of time.


think LBJ

Rotten bastard LBJ. That's the kind of president that scares me.

389 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:53:49am

re: #387 Walter L. Newton

Ok, then you are making an issue out of nothing and you know it. You sound just like someone with BDS.

I knew that if Obama got elected, we would see our own conservatives turn into little KosKids.

I hope LGF's doesn't become a dumping site for conservatives that lack critical thinking skills.


Not unless Stinky starts NOT paying attention. Those "conservatives" will get the stick faster than you can say "-"

390 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:54:07am
391 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:54:36am

re: #322 imtoast

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

The military has sworn an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States" - so there will be no "overthrow."

As for fighting any tyranny that may be established by anyone
that option is covered too.

392 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:56:16am

re: #360 imtoast
Kindly read my #345 - The military takes an oath - every single member of our Military does, to protect and defend the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.That oath is NOT to protect and defend the POTUS - although they most certainly would do so as he is the CIC, but I believe that if any president was stupid enough to try form yet another civilian "militia" (over and above the National Guard and Reserves and State Troopers and what not) and make some sort of attempt to take the country by force, the military would follow it's sworn oath and would defend us - the Constitution of the United States.

393 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:56:18am

re: #389 sattv4u2

Not unless Stinky starts NOT paying attention. Those "conservatives" will get the stick faster than you can say "-"

I know that, just making a point. And so were you. And together, I hope some of the Lizards gets the message.

I have notice that Charles has had to deal with a lot of folks coming out of the woodwork, doing just what they have been complaining the left has been doing for years.

Just because the left lost it's critical thinking skills a long time ago, Obama's election should not automatically trigger conservative Obama Derangement Syndrome.

394 Steffan  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:56:24am

re: #52 Charles

And by the way, just to make something very clear, anyone who even hints at supporting or enabling this kind of behavior is going to lose their LGF account. You may think you're anonymous here, but if I get a call from the Secret Service about a comment posted at LGF (which I have not, to date) I will absolutely cooperate with them fully and give them everything they need to get in touch with you. And I won't even think twice about it.

The only thing I intend to do in regards to Obama is to buy a lot of popcorn, sit back, and watch the train wreck.

I may speculate about his reelection prospects in 2012.

People are ascribing such wonderful things to the Lightbringer, and he's not even in office yet. What will they think six months from now?

395 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:58:16am

re: #393 Walter L. Newton

I know that, just making a point. And so were you. And together, I hope some of the Lizards gets the message.

I have notice that Charles has had to deal with a lot of folks coming out of the woodwork, doing just what they have been complaining the left has been doing for years.

Just because the left lost it's critical thinking skills a long time ago, Obama's election should not automatically trigger conservative Obama Derangement Syndrome.

Not only coming out of the woodwork, but just plain ole coming out. Quite a few long time lizards got the stick recently, I've been told

396 caligal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:58:34am

re: #387 Walter L. Newtonyou missed my point, maybe I didn't state clearly. I am NOT anything like a koskid. I possess critical thinking skills; sorry you were offended.

397 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:59:37am

re: #387 Walter L. Newton
"I hope LGF's doesn't become a dumping site for conservatives that lack critical thinking skills."
Nope, I think Freepers has the monopoly on that.
Not to say we don't and won't have some idiots here, but Charles runs a relatively freedom of speech kinda place here and I believe expects those of us commenters who aren't loons to call out those who slip in.

398 big L  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:59:48am

This is cya by the Secret Service.All bs,prob a lot of libs.
If they were so worried about any threats to a President why did they not arrest a lot of the leftie-goofies who threatened GWB.
They did nothing, at least the lefties did not squeal:'Bush Cheney nazis' at all. Well, it is their bodies protecting the big "O". Better look to the lefties, guys. If Obama doesn't follow the script he is toast. Obie thinks he can handle his crackpot "friends". He can't.
I wonder if he allows the Secret Service to caryy concealed weapons. OR do they have to carry noodles in the holster to assuage his anti-gun beliefs.

399 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:00:09am

re: #396 caligal

you missed my point, maybe I didn't state clearly. I am NOT anything like a koskid. I possess critical thinking skills; sorry you were offended.

Walter and I are old. We often miss things. I misplaced my mind years ago

400 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:01:48am

re: #396 caligal

you missed my point, maybe I didn't state clearly. I am NOT anything like a koskid. I possess critical thinking skills; sorry you were offended.

Sorry, you jumped in when a lot of comments were sort of slapping Charles in the face. He wants to be clear that LGF's is not going to become the place for any of the antics we have seen on the left over the last 8 years.

And I got a little hot. Please accept my apology.

401 RememberSekhmet?  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:02:23am

re: #380 sattv4u2

che la fa significa ,,, "SELF-LART" ?

LART---Loser's Attitude Radjustment Tool. In other words, Obama's own stupidity is likely to lead him into making a mistake.

402 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:02:26am

re: #395 sattv4u2
Yeah quite of few of the "oldtimers" have gotten the stick but not for anything even vaugley resembling Obama Derangement Syndrome!

403 caligal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:02:38am

re: #399 sattv4u2

thank you for your tolerance

404 caligal  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:03:28am

re: #400 Walter L. Newton

done with a smile!

405 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:03:43am

re: #399 sattv4u2 LOL! Of all the things I've lost in my life, I miss my memory the most!

406 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:05:06am

Well,

Off to shower and get into the theatre. Of course, we have a show tonight. I hate Christmas show that start even before Veterans Day. By the time Christmas comes, I'm going to be so burned out on holiday poop, geeeessshhh.

407 i_hate_the_msm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:05:19am

I don't know if anyone else has said this but, I claim bullsh*t. Read the article. The article claims membership increases in white supremecist groups is one instance of "threats" against Obama.
How do these people know Obama's been the most threatened? When have records of this type ever been kept?
The MSM can protect Obama if they make him the victim of everything, and this is the start of that.

408 imtoast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:06:12am

re: #387 Walter L. Newton

Ok, then you are making an issue out of nothing and you know it. You sound just like someone with BDS.

I knew that if Obama got elected, we would see our own conservatives turn into little KosKids.

I hope LGF's doesn't become a dumping site for conservatives that lack critical thinking skills.

You know what, I don't usually get catty with any of you on LGF. I adore all of you though Killgore can try my patience. But you are coming off really billergent and I personally think you need to find yourself a girlfriend and relieve some of it on her. When I ask a question it's because I would like to know the answer. I don't ask it so that you can attempt to belittle me. Please, if you want to respond and answer a question for me, don't treat me like I'm some stupid homeless person with absolutely no thought process. I respect this site, I have learned quite a bit and find that daily I have learned even more. Don't make it hard on the people who don't post much but find themselves wondering and in need of answers. I don't believe that Obama is going to take over the United States in a coup, I used it as an example only to find out what our military's actions would be. Stop treating people like they are stupid for asking the questions cuz you are pissing me off.

409 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:06:25am

re: #402 realwest

Yeah quite of few of the "oldtimers" have gotten the stick but not for anything even vaugley resembling Obama Derangement Syndrome!

Actually, some have for the Obama=Nazi stuff. I came within a whisker when I posted comparisons to Hitlers rise in the 1930's to Obamas now. Keep in mind, I was NOT saying Obama='s Hitler, nor was I saying the Dems= Nazis. I was making a historical comparison
Both relative unknowns, whipping up populist support amid an economic crises. Each using powerful rhetorical speach patterns

410 Friend of USA[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:06:35am
411 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:07:43am

re: #407 i_hate_the_msm

The msm was in the bag for the ONE before the election what makes anyone believe that any of that has changed? This might be similar to the number of homeless that magically rises once a conservative takes office but nearly disappears once a liberal takes office.

Facts and figures please.

412 legalpad  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:08:10am

re: #365 Walter L. Newton

I've done it before. When my 1st wife started acting crazy and running around with criminals, I dumped my business. Because she had no interest in raising our three small children outside of what I would pay in child support, she just blew it off. Her lawyers assured her I would only yield very small child support. My first three children grew up with me because I was poor.

413 Boogberg[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:09:16am
414 Steffan  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:09:35am

re: #322 imtoast

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

The military -- in fact, every Federal employee from the VP down, military or civilian -- swears to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

We don't swear allegiance to the flag, to the country, to Mom or to apple pie. We swear allegiance to the Constitution.

And may God have mercy on anyone who tries to supplant it, because we won't.

415 sattv4u2[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:11:33am
416 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:11:39am

re: #409 sattv4u2
"some have for the Obama=Nazi stuff"? Really? I don't remember that at all (but then again, see my #
405!
Do you remember who (whom? crap, I can never keep that straight)?

417 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:13:32am

re: #416 realwest

"some have for the Obama=Nazi stuff"? Really? I don't remember that at all (but then again, see my #
405!
Do you remember who (whom? crap, I can never keep that straight)?

Sorry ,, not off the top of my cranium. I get who gets whacked for what confussled!

418 Friend of USA[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:13:49am
419 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:14:06am

re: #416 realwest

re: #417 sattv4u2

Sorry ,, not off the top of my cranium. I get who gets whacked for what confussled!

maybe Charles has a list!

420 realwest[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:15:22am
421 sattv4u2[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:15:58am
422 Dirk Diggler  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:16:18am

A biracial man is elected president and all Stormfront gets are a lousy 2,000 members? Out of a nation of some 200,000,000 white people? I'm guessing that's not exactly the Turner Diaries type racial apocalypse those asshats were expecting.

In other more notable Barack Obama news, when it comes to indefinite detention and extraordinary interrogation measures, Obama's policies show no sign of CHANGE!

423 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:16:33am

re: #414 Steffan
AMEN.

424 Friend of USA[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:17:48am
425 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:18:11am

re: #422 Dirk Diggler

I've suspected all along that once Pres. Obama starts seeing the actual hard intel he would have a change of heart on things like that

426 sattv4u2[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:19:02am
427 Spiny Norman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:19:51am

re: #397 realwest

"I hope LGF's doesn't become a dumping site for conservatives that lack critical thinking skills."
Nope, I think Freepers has the monopoly on that.
Not to say we don't and won't have some idiots here, but Charles runs a relatively freedom of speech kinda place here and I believe expects those of us commenters who aren't loons to call out those who slip in.

Ironically, commenters at JW call LGFers "Freeper rejects". Free Republic comments are completely indistinguishable from JW comments.

428 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:19:54am

re: #425 sattv4u2

I suspect that he might say "And to think I actually wanted this job!"

Be careful of what you wish for. You might actually get it.

429 gman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:21:19am

re: #408 imtoast

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

I want you to go outside and take a look at the houses in your neighborhood. Chances are you are looking at the home of a veteran. They are your brothers and neighbors, sisters, parents, grandparents, cousins, and nephews. They volunteered willingly to defend the constitution of the United States. They are not "robots brainwashed by the government to carry out sinister missions" found in comic books. Never lose sight of that and remember that many of the posters here on LGF are veterans.

430 Alberta Oil Peon  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:21:37am

re: #80 Boogberg

Tasteless as it is, yes. But I doubt the moonbats responsible for that paper mache silliness are the types who would seriously plot to assassinate (much less threaten) the President. I have the feeling that far-right kooks are much more dangerous.

You know, it wouldn't surprise me at all, that if an actual attempt were to be made upon President Obama's life, that it would come from the unhinged Left. That was certainly the case in the most recent precedents.

It's the unhinged left that are going to feel the keenest sense of betrayal when the rainbows and unicorns don't materialize.

Not to say that we shouldn't be vigilant, though.

431 sattv4u2[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:22:32am
432 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:22:55am

re: #424 Friend of USA
Maybe because we are BETTER than the left. And fwiw, I don't recall ANYONE on LGF calling for the death of any president - W, or Clinton or Carter. It's not something that's done out here.
And death threats against Obama have somewhat more credibility because, unlike most of the deranged moonbat leftists, there are SOME - hopefully VERY FEW - of the Neo-Nazi, KKK type (I refuse to call 'em Right Wingers cause that would confer on them a sense of belonging to the Right) who are capable of attempting such a thing - not just building paper mache puppets of Obama.

433 Friend of USA[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:23:20am
434 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:24:22am

re: #429 gman

I am a Constitutionalist who wants our government to follow it.

435 Boogberg  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:24:56am

re: #422 Dirk Diggler

In other more notable Barack Obama news, when it comes to indefinite detention and extraordinary interrogation measures, Obama's policies show no sign of CHANGE!

Funny how that happens when you're invited to top level security meetings and presented with the full capacity of the US National Security infrastructure.

436 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:25:01am

Well all y'all its been, ah, interesting out here today, but I'm gonna go eat lunch now.
I hope you all have a GREAT DAY and that I get the chance to see you down the road.

437 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:25:13am

re: #424 Friend of USA

To those who freaked out on my little comment,

Read s-l-o-w-l-y this time and try to understand what I said,

The left has been having wet dreams about a Bush assassination for years, they even made a movie about it,

so what is the big deal with threaths against Obama?...

Get it now?

Any threat against the POTUS is a problem.

Such talk is rampant on the blogosphere, and Charles will not tolerate it. It's a crime. Such talk will be used by the left to marginalize those who oppose Obama's policies. It's a problem for those of us who legitimately do not want Obama's agenda to succeed.

The threats are a big problem for us.
I don't care if the media ignored the Bush threats, that doesn't make it right. Minimizing the threats against Obama because the left did with threats against Bush is moral equivalence and doesn't work either.

438 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:25:59am

re: #434 Perplexed

I am a Constitutionalist who wants our government to follow it.

Then you must be a right wing bitter clingy hater just like me!
/.

439 Alberta Oil Peon  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:26:22am

re: #111 MandyManners

Who's to say that some of those new Stormfront members aren't KosKids looking to stir up some shit?

Do a Web search for "Stormfront Member" "Lucy." You might be quite surprised!

440 Shug  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:26:25am

re: #410 Friend of USA

So because some sons of a bitches threatened Bush, and the media filth downplayed it, it's OK to make threats against Obama ?

How about taking the moral high ground and saying that any threats against any American president are wrong (and illegal ) ?

Then you can be critical against people who are selectively outraged or not outraged and have the credibility and consistency to back it up

441 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:26:36am

re: #438 jcm

Then you must be a right wing bitter clingy hater just like me!
/.

Damned right.

442 imtoast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:26:38am

re: #429 gman

I want you to go outside and take a look at the houses in your neighborhood. Chances are you are looking at the home of a veteran. They are your brothers and neighbors, sisters, parents, grandparents, cousins, and nephews. They volunteered willingly to defend the constitution of the United States. They are not "robots brainwashed by the government to carry out sinister missions" found in comic books. Never lose sight of that and remember that many of the posters here on LGF are veterans.

That's why asked the question here.

443 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:26:43am

re: #433 Friend of USA

# 426 sattv4u2,

Tell me what you think my comment means.

no ,, you tell US what you mean. The words are pretty clear. The phraseology was cut and dry

444 realwest  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:26:59am

re: #429 gman
Fucking "A" on that one brother!
NOW I gotta go eat some lunch!

445 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:28:02am
446 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:28:19am

re: #444 realwest

Fucking "A" on that one brother!
NOW I gotta go eat some lunch!

skip a meal ,, inflate your tires ,,, shut off your heat for a day ,, be patriotic !

/

447 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:30:59am

I come back from my taking my shower and I see that some people are still stuck on stupid. Must be the weather today.

448 Catttt  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:31:43am

re: #424 Friend of USA

To those who freaked out on my little comment,

Read s-l-o-w-l-y this time and try to understand what I said,

The left has been having wet dreams about a Bush assassination for years, they even made a movie about it,

so what is the big deal with threaths against Obama?...

Get it now?

If the left jumped off a cliff, would you do it too? This is the sort of thing I normally say to children. Adults usually have this concept firmly in their heads.

449 Friend of USA  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:33:10am

# 437 jcm

Such talk is rampant on the blogosphere, and Charles will not tolerate it.

If you think my comment was a threat you are out of your mind.

450 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:33:45am
451 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:34:51am

re: #448 Catttt

If the left jumped off a cliff, would you do it too? This is the sort of thing I normally say to children. Adults usually have this concept firmly in their heads.

perhaps we've (you) found the problem!

452 AceR  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:35:20am

IMHO...
I wish everyone who is so angry about Obama being elected would take that negativity and apply it to actually doing something positive.

I didn't vote for Obama, and I disagree wholeheartedly with his agenda and policies. I am suspect of his friendships and associations with the likes of Ayers, Rezco, Wright, and Khalidi.

So, what am I going to do about it?

I am going to be vigilant with everything that comes out of this Obama administration and Congress.

I will do an end run around the main stream media and use various websites and talk show forums that I trust will give me accurate and informed information.

I will perform due diligence in knowing and understanding the impact of any policies, laws, judges, or executive orders that Obama and/or Congress tries to push through that contradict my values.

I will write letters to my congressman and senators expressing my opinion and reminding them that they work for me.

I will work at the local, state, and national level to support the candidates that represent the values I hold dear.

And I will work to convince my friends and family to do the same.

453 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:35:41am

re: #449 Friend of USA

# 437 jcm


If you think my comment was a threat you are out of your mind.

threat? NO ,,,, mindlessly, smuggly ignorant ? DING DING DING

454 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:35:48am

re: #449 Friend of USA

# 437 jcm

If you think my comment was a threat you are out of your mind.

I didn't say that.

But you are dismissing that type of talk.

By not speaking against it, your passivity encourages it.

455 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:36:56am
456 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:37:35am
457 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:37:53am

re: #449 Friend of USA

# 437 jcm If you think my comment was a threat you are out of your mind.

Well, it seems like everyone that has responded to your comment seems to think so.

Usually, when multiple strangers point out the same thing to me, I step back and consider that maybe I hadn't made myself clear, or that I did make a mistake; at least examine the possible reason WHY other people are responding to me in such a way.

Instead, you just keep coming back, repeating the same comment (and behavior) and wonder why everyone else is "stupid."

Look in a mirror for a few minutes and reconsider the way you framed your comment.

And maybe go back and read Charles' comment on this thread about what he will not tolerate.

458 Dayenu  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:38:11am

Ironically, Obama's assassination would be one of the biggest disasters for the right in generations.

If you think the messiah-ship and hero-worship of Obama is bad now, all you need to do is assassinate him, and you can make the Camelot, JFK sainthood, last forever.

I heard that Kennedy was not the best president, but his death gave him a certain standing that he would not have had were he able to finish his term.

The right would be better off if Obama takes office, does what he does, and leaves. Then at least he would have a standard... a man... to run against. Rather than a demigod.

But I can't imagine the flack he's getting could be greater than Bush's.

459 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:39:11am
460 deanayer  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:39:52am

I think this is nonsense, every off-hand jab on the internet (which didn't materialize till late Clinton) doesn't constitute a threat. We have defined "threat" down pretty far and I have no doubt the dems and the MSM get a thrill out of reporting each one. This services to make conservatives look like wingnuts and since thats the "narrative" anyway it furthers their interests to hype this. I don't recall any articles about drooling liberals going into psychotic meltdowns over "chimpy McBushitler" etc.

461 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:40:36am
462 6pat6  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:41:45am

My question is: What about all of the threats that have been made on a daily basis, on virtually ALL of the Lefty Lunatic blogs and websites against President Bush; both before his inauguration in his first term, and during his nearly eight years in office? From the tone of the article, THAT hasn't been a problem, I guess. So, threats against President Bush and his cabinet aren't a big deal, whereas threats against the President-elect are? The point is - BOTH are a big deal. The MSM sure likes to hype shit up any way they can about the Chosen One, that is for certain.

463 Dasher  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:43:29am

re: #322 imtoast

OT: I'm hoping Charles doesn't put a new thread yet so I can get an answer.
Question: With all the talk of a civil militia how does the actual military stand? Do they support an overthrow of the Constitution or is there some way they can fight Obama should he try to take over and bring in a Stalin like country? This has really been bothering me and I know at least one of you here has the answer. HELP!

I think we have found that ignoring the Constitution has worked pretty well since 1932. FDR did a real good job of ignoring it, as have most of the following presidents and congresses.

464 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:44:53am

re: #462 6pat6

OY

465 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:45:07am
466 DEPORTMAN  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:50:28am

MSM BS, period. It is common that many looney tunes wackos make threat against whomever is in power. Obama is no exception, and the MSM continues to over magnify any perceived threats or craziness against the God-king.

467 Friend of USA  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:50:38am

#462 6pat6 said,

What about all of the threats that have been made on a daily basis, on virtually ALL of the Lefty Lunatic blogs and websites against President Bush; both before his inauguration in his first term, and during his nearly eight years in office? From the tone of the article, THAT hasn't been a problem, I guess. So, threats against President Bush and his cabinet aren't a big deal, whereas threats against the President-elect are? The point is - BOTH are a big deal. The MSM sure likes to hype shit up any way they can about the Chosen One, that is for certain.

That is what I was trying to say.

468 allbusiness  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:50:55am

You have to remember that this is the internet, anonymity of comments/postings encourages people to say things they would never dare utter in real life, much less follow through on.

Besides, nobody can get past the Secret Service.

469 6pat6  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:50:57am

re: #467 Friend of USA

I know.

470 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:52:05am

re: #467 Friend of USA

#462 6pat6 said,

That is what I was trying to say.

That's not what you posted. Lier.

471 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:52:28am
472 zelnaga  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:53:58am

re: #315 kynna

I certainly don't mind NOT talking about the substance of the article posted (assassination of a US president is an awful and depressing topic), but I think Zelnaga is making the point that anyone on the right who thinks they'll achieve their desired goals by such an act is pathetically mistaken and the reverse would happen.


That's it, exactly. Charles said "anyone who even hints at supporting or enabling this kind of behavior is going to lose their LGF account". I was not supporting it - I was saying that it'd be, ultimately, self-destructive - that it would not be in your own self-interest to support it.

Certainly, anything that's not in the rights self-interest could be a leftist plot to misrepresent the right, but sometimes people don't realize what's in their best interests...

Anyway, I'm sorry - I didn't think that my post would be interpreted in the way that it was...

473 Friend of USA  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:53:58am

6pat6

I'm glad some people get it.

thanks

474 6pat6  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:54:17am
475 Lyndsey[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:54:40am
476 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:54:42am

re: #471 taxfreekiller

the trolls do not stay around long enough any longer
so there seems to be over reaction some times now
to some herein who make remarks not perfect in the
center of the spectrum, hues make for better paintings

Personal responsibility does not end when your sworn in as Pres. of the U.S..
Personal responsibility does not end when you log on to lgf's.

Look, I don't know what you are talking about. I'm just trying to find naked pictures of Rashida Jones while my hair dries.
/

477 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:56:16am

re: #467 Friend of USA

#462 6pat6 said,


That is what I was trying to say.

IF so, you have a terrible grasp of the English language. AND, what 6Pat6 posted wasn't all that inspiring either! Citing bad behavior from one side doesn't condone bad behaviour from our side

478 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:58:56am

re: #477 sattv4u2

IF so, you have a terrible grasp of the English language. AND, what 6Pat6 posted wasn't all that inspiring either! Citing bad behavior from one side doesn't condone bad behaviour from our side

re: #457 Walter L. Newton

That's what I was saying in my #457. He won't respond to it. It would require him to consider his original comment, which he won't do. It's like debating with a madman.

479 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 11:59:58am

re: #478 Walter L. Newton

re: #457 Walter L. Newton

That's what I was saying in my #457. He won't respond to it. It would require him to consider his original comment, which he won't do. It's like debating with a madman.

I know. I'm just covering your flank!

480 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:00:43pm
481 Shug  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:02:10pm

re: #478 Walter L. Newton

re: #457 Walter L. Newton

That's what I was saying in my #457. He won't respond to it. It would require him to consider his original comment, which he won't do. It's like debating with a madman.


He stated : "so what is the big deal with threaths against Obama?..."

nuff said

482 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:02:53pm

re: #479 sattv4u2

I know. I'm just covering your flank!

Well, hair is dry, off to the theatre. Got work to do. I suspect Friend of USA will jump in after I'm gone. Go get him for me.

483 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:03:25pm

re: #481 Shug

He stated : "so what is the big deal with threaths against Obama?..."

nuff said

but claimed we didn't know what he meant by it!

484 sattv4u2  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:04:05pm

re: #482 Walter L. Newton

Well, hair is dry, off to the theatre. Got work to do. I suspect Friend of USA will jump in after I'm gone. Go get him for me.

Hell ,,, you'll beat him in the debate even while you're not here !

485 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:07:40pm
486 Son of the Black Dog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:07:55pm

re: #242 Spiny Norman

Wrong. Fake-but-accurate hogwash. Dan Rather (surprise!) reported this, claiming that they were celebrating Kennedy's assassination, but in reality, they were told they had the rest of the day off, but not why.

No, you're wrong. There were people in my high school expressing glee at the fact that JFK had been shot.

487 jcm  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:08:09pm

re: #482 Walter L. Newton

Well, hair is dry, off to the theatre. Got work to do. I suspect Friend of USA will jump in after I'm gone. Go get him for me.

Break a leg!

488 Friend of USA[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:09:03pm
489 Kincsem  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:09:47pm

re: #216 Perplexed

When JFK was killed there were a few students celebrating the early news and this was at an elementary school. The military despised him.

That story has been debunked. What actually happened was that the school was dismissed early without telling the children what had happened. They were cheering getting out early.

We have Dan Rather to thank for spinning it into cheering JFK's murder.

490 Alberta Oil Peon  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:10:49pm

re: #353 Walter L. Newton

Thanks. I swear, do people not know what is going on in the world. Guess what folks, those quaint guys called the Royal Mounted Police, yea, well that's a civil militia. Haven't seen Dudley Doright's (sp?) trying to take over Canada yet, have we.

Geeeessshhh...

Walter, Walter, Walter. (shakes head)

The RCMP is a national police force. In its original incarnation as the Royal North West Mounted Police, it was indeed a paramilitary organization. Their mission was to show the flag in the then "North West Territories" which was then comprised of the entire Far North plus that area that subsequently became the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. If I remember correctly, they even had a few cannons at one time.

Now they are simply the national police force, and are the default front-line police service in most of the country. By contract, they act in the role of provincial police in those provinces that do not have their own Provincial Police. IIRC, only Ontario, Quebec, and Newfoundland have their own Provincial Police. B.C. and Alberta used to have, but phased them out in favor of using the RCMP.

If the RCMP did not exist, we would have to create other police forces to fill their role. They are not an extraneous layer of police power imposed from on high.

Obama's proposed "civilian security force" has the potential to be some sort of political thugocracy like the Ton Ton Macoutes or the S.A., if that's the way they want to run it, but more likely, it will wind up being some kind of feather-bedded make-work organization like Roosevelt's Civilian Conservation Corps, or the Peace Corps. Or Pierre Trudeau's Katimavik program in Canada.

There simply is no unfilled gap in the policing structure of the U.S.A. where a carabinieri-style force would be needed.

491 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:14:33pm
492 ladycatnip  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:17:44pm

Any threat to any sitting president or president-elect should be taken very seriously and dealt with immediately. Not having any inside information on whether the constant flow of threats to Bush by wacko moonbats were ever investigated, as they may have been, but at least none of them materialized.

Now that the O will be my president, I will be praying for him on a daily basis as I did Bush - for wisdom, for protection, for his family and all those around him. As depressed as I was when Obama got elected (drowned myself in brownies and ice cream that night, then went to bed early to sleep it off), I do respect the office - which means I'm taking a step back from my usual disdain and sarcastic mockery of him - as I began to see how easy it was for me to become like the Kos people with my attitude. Don't want to see the right turn into the hate-filled, intolerant, rabid left. I will, however, have no problem speaking out on any of his uber-leftist decisions or selling out our country.

The way Bush has been and still is treated is unconscionable and without excuse.

[Making a public declaration of this to hold my feet to the fire.]

493 Shug  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:19:43pm

To Friend of the USA.

Good Riddance. You are no friend to the USA

494 reine.de.tout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:21:10pm

re: #303 FurryOldGuyJeans

Had to report you, you quoted a deleted post. sorry

495 chukardog  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:41:41pm

Im calling BS, this one stinks

496 SixDegrees  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:44:37pm

re: #422 Dirk Diggler


In other more notable Barack Obama news, when it comes to indefinite detention and extraordinary interrogation measures, Obama's policies show no sign of CHANGE!

Anybody gotten the KKiddie's reaction to such announcements yet? The spittle must be flying over there.

497 justadot  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:46:31pm

re: #351 gymnast

A bus load of kids to be investigated by the Secret Service? [Link: ...]

Here's a working link to that story: [Link: www.idahostatesman.com...]

498 descolada9  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 12:46:40pm

Don't like seeing threats against the life of a Prez or Prez-elect, but excuse me if I don't get worked up over this one. How many years have we put up with death threats against George W. Bush? How many books, movies, plays, songs called for ill upon President Bush and the MSM yawned? How many threats have there been and wish for ill for people such as Karl Rove, Ann Coulter, John Bolton, Sarah Palin, Joe the Plumber and the list goes on?

Welcome to the big leagues, Barry, now suck it up.

499 Ojoe  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 1:30:59pm

re: #4 Shug

He's the president now. I support him. in 4 years I will make my judgement.

re: #471 taxfreekiller

Agree 100. Personal responsibility is all the time;
everything you do counts for good or evil in ways you cannot even imagine.

500 ugetwhatuputout  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 1:36:33pm

My bet on these threats is that 75% of them will be coming from the far left looking for paybacks.

501 claire  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 1:38:29pm

Well, I know the Feds were extremely worried before the election about what might happen to this country if the worst case happened. I don't imagine that concern has lessened.

502 bbuddha  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 1:41:45pm

re: #470 Walter L. Newton

That's not what you posted. Lier.

I got that was what he was trying to say.

503 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 1:46:57pm

re: #489 Kincsem

Hi, I was at an elementary school outside of Ellsworth AFB when that happened. Some of my classmates engaged in celebrating JFK getting shot. Personal, first hand experience. Also witnessed the SAC base response to the Cuban Missile Crisis. Is that debunked as well?

504 gymnast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 1:50:02pm

re: #497 justadot

Here's a working link to that story: [Link: www.idahostatesman.com...]

Thanks justadot, thats the story with the comments. I you do a Google search of "Schoolbus of Rexbug children chanting" you will find "a ton" of stories about the incident, including some pretty nasty DU links.

505 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 1:58:28pm

re: #504 gymnast

Thanks justadot, thats the story with the comments. I you do a Google search of "Schoolbus of Rexbug children chanting" you will find "a ton" of stories about the incident, including some pretty nasty DU links.

I remember a kid listening to shortwave broadcasts. He collected QSL cards from the stations he listened to. Well, he sent off for a QSL card from Radio Moscow. They sent him the card and a bunch of other stuff as well. Shortly after this kid got the QSL card some folks from the government showed up to question him about his loyalty to the US. Took a bit of work but in the 60's there was a 12 yr old with a FBI investigation folder for anti-American activities.

506 cschrobs  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 2:02:53pm

I am pleased with most of what I see here, but some of the comments are shameful and embarrassing. Fight the good fight - YES. Lead the charge for what you believe - YES. Continence any hint of violence (and I mean ANY hint, no matter how cleverly phrased) -- NO. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not ever. I did not vote for Barack Obama, and I do not support a liberal majority in Congress. But he is our President-Elect. We (read LGF readers) need to oppose him under the democratic system and we MUST treat him with the respect due an incoming president. And never, under any circumstances tolerate any hint of terrorist threats. Once again, I may not be a big fan of the incoming president for the time being, but we must always be better than that. Anything that even slightly hints at terrorist threats is NEVER the answer. Do conservatism a favor and speak out against this the same way we would speak out against this sort of thing elsewhere. Many thanks. :)

507 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 2:06:06pm

re: #506 cschrobs

I am pleased with most of what I see here, but some of the comments are shameful and embarrassing. Fight the good fight - YES. Lead the charge for what you believe - YES. Continence any hint of violence (and I mean ANY hint, no matter how cleverly phrased) -- NO. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not ever. I did not vote for Barack Obama, and I do not support a liberal majority in Congress. But he is our President-Elect. We (read LGF readers) need to oppose him under the democratic system and we MUST treat him with the respect due an incoming president. And never, under any circumstances tolerate any hint of terrorist threats. Once again, I may not be a big fan of the incoming president for the time being, but we must always be better than that. Anything that even slightly hints at terrorist threats is NEVER the answer. Do conservatism a favor and speak out against this the same way we would speak out against this sort of thing elsewhere. Many thanks. :)

Two big thumbs up from me.

508 Charles  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 2:09:34pm

re: #497 justadot

Here's a working link to that story: [Link: www.idahostatesman.com...]

Wow. Well, obviously an adult had them chanting that. Isn't Rexburg an LDS area?

509 Ojoe  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 2:30:14pm

re: #506 cschrobs

Your post shows how to actually be effective.

510 winston06  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 2:49:21pm

Oh puh-leaz

511 ploome hineni[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 2:50:38pm
512 AuntAcid  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 2:56:05pm

re: #458 Dayenu
"Ironically, Obama's assassination would be one of the biggest disasters for the right in generations."

It's more than spooky to think that one guy with a sharp eye, determination and a little practice could change the course of history.

513 Perplexed  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 3:13:41pm

re: #512 AuntAcid

How about the anarchists who killed Arch Duke Ferdinand? Brought us WWI and WWII. I prefer valid ballots to bullets when it comes to American politics.

514 reddragon  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 3:38:19pm

You are exactly right, the peaceful transition of power is what separates the USA form a lot of counties in this world. the fight is to get back the majority in the congress and the the white house.

re: #506 cschrobs

I am pleased with most of what I see here, but some of the comments are shameful and embarrassing. Fight the good fight - YES. Lead the charge for what you believe - YES. Continence any hint of violence (and I mean ANY hint, no matter how cleverly phrased) -- NO. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not ever. I did not vote for Barack Obama, and I do not support a liberal majority in Congress. But he is our President-Elect. We (read LGF readers) need to oppose him under the democratic system and we MUST treat him with the respect due an incoming president. And never, under any circumstances tolerate any hint of terrorist threats. Once again, I may not be a big fan of the incoming president for the time being, but we must always be better than that. Anything that even slightly hints at terrorist threats is NEVER the answer. Do conservatism a favor and speak out against this the same way we would speak out against this sort of thing elsewhere. Many thanks. :)

515 Adrenalyn  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 3:55:06pm

re: #514 reddragon

You are exactly right, the peaceful transition of power is what separates the USA form a lot of counties in this world. the fight is to get back the majority in the congress and the the white house.

ah, but had McCain won
peaceful transition WOULD NOT likely have happened
look at the peaceful gay folks in california getting loud to violent after prop8 was passed, ending gay marriage ?
look at the veterans for "peace" movement
along with CodePink and other leftwing groups
they scare me, honestly
Seattle ring a bell ?

look to the hate coming from leftwing websites when say Cheney has an irregular heartbeat

no, this country is only a few steps away from anarchy.

except when the bad guys win, the good guys (that would be us on the right) do not get violent
we may not be happy, but violence we do not incite

but.....we do need to oppose them
and let them know we always will

problem is, for the last few of Bush's years
no one opposed them or the media

and they ran away with both houses of Congress and the White House and who knows if ever again we'll see another republican in the White House or in a majority of either legislative arm

not for 20 years at least, IMHO

516 Fierce Guppy  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 3:55:13pm

re: #513 Perplexed

One anarchist killed Ferdinand (and his wife Sophie), and he would not have done it had a clique of Serbian officers called the Black Hand refused him permission.

517 gymnast  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 3:58:34pm

re: #508 Charles

Wow. Well, obviously an adult had them chanting that. Isn't Rexburg an LDS area?

Charles, that area is solid LDS and the only adult on that bus load of 1st and 2nd graders was the driver. The only thing more perverse than the busload of chanting kids is the Dems reaction to it. Those Rexburg kids take their Religion and politics quite seriously even if the Dems in Idaho resemble a "chorus line of Marxist tap dancing clowns".

518 Marlin925  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 4:08:09pm

Can't stand the 44th CiC due to his politics, but not hoping for his demise. I do predict a pie-ing from his own side when he cannot deliver the Workers Paradise he promised. I'm a nice guy, just hope he gets a Key-Lime to the kisser. YUM!

519 leftover54  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 4:13:02pm

re: #5 FurryOldGuyJeans

You mean to say if any crazy WHITE person...." Right ?

520 justadot  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 4:50:14pm

re: #504 gymnast

including some pretty nasty DU links.

Yeah, I saw that — some of the DUmmies even want to go after the parents. Unhinged.

re: #508 Charles

I didn't know that. According to this Salon piece, it's The reddest place in America.

521 mcmeador  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 4:55:37pm

Hey, I'm not in denial about the whole issue, but we really don't have all the stats. For all we know, the majority of these threats are in the form of internet postings, therefore easier for the Secret Service and law enforcement to find. Considering not too long ago, there was no such thing as the internet and that internet usage over the past 8 years has increased by 130.9% in the U.S. ([Link: www.internetworldstats.com...] and by 305.5% worldwide ([Link: www.internetworldstats.com...] it should come as no surprise that the number of internet threats against a president-elect would increase. So just because we're seeing more of them now doesn't necessarily mean that there weren't as many people expressing this sentiment in some way before against other president-elects. Maybe law enforcement just never detected much of it.

Also, many people feel a lot freer about or more comfortable with voicing opinions online than they would in person or in other forms. It also gives them the satisfaction of having an audience that they wouldn't feel just writing it down on paper. So it's also possible that there are indeed more threats against Obama being issued now than against any president-elect before him, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the number of people feeling this negative sentiment towards him is greater than the number of people that felt the same sentiment toward other president-elects.

I don't know if what I've just said makes any sense, but I know what I'm trying to say. Haha. But like I said, we don't have all the stats, so we'll probably never know.

522 agtiger  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 5:15:19pm

re: #6 Sharmuta

This is why we don't behave like koslings, folks.

No, we don't behave like koslings because our parents raised us right, and wouldn't tolerate us acting like a bunch of screeching morons! More importantly, the lessons stuck with us and we've realized that some portion of the population has to be the adults.

But yes, I see your point. ;-)

523 Drider  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 5:27:49pm

So when is the movie coming out?
Bush had to wait some years for his assassination movie.

524 winston06  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 5:30:33pm

Where were these people when people made films about killing president Bush?

525 Uncle Joe  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 5:53:07pm

Has anyone pointed out that most of these types of alleged threats are total bullshit cooked up by Obama fanatics?

[Link: www.dailycomet.com...]

Dyron Hart, 19, of Poplarville, Miss., who was arrested Wednesday, allegedly told investigators he wanted to create a “reaction” when he sent Facebook “friends” across three states a message stating he planned to kill 3,000 people, including them, in the wake of Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential victory Nov. 4.

The messages were sent early Nov. 5.

The message recipients, like Hart, are black. But authorities said he gave the impression in the messages, sent under another name, that he was white.

526 Freods  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 6:01:42pm

There are 300 million people in this country. If 90% of them are normal and 10% are crazy that means 30 million crazy people are running around doing scary stuff. The fact that there isnt more nasty racist ranting and threatening is a cause for hope, not despair.

527 justadot  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 6:06:43pm

re: #524 winston06

Where were these people when people made films about killing president Bush?

Probably sitting in the front row.

528 grahamski  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 6:08:01pm

If somebody was going to make an attempt at knocking off the big ZERO, they wouldn't advertise it to the world...unless they are idiots.

529 grahamski  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 6:10:44pm

re: #518 Marlin925

Can't stand the 44th CiC due to his politics, but not hoping for his demise. I do predict a pie-ing from his own side when he cannot deliver the Workers Paradise he promised. I'm a nice guy, just hope he gets a Key-Lime to the kisser. YUM!

That is a waste of pie!

530 J.S.  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 6:34:58pm

Well, I think that overall there's been such a notable decline in civility, and it certainly didn't start with Obama's nomination as Democratic front runner. I think it began with that Bush Derangement Syndrome...no one even appeared to want to put a stop to BDS...and it is just getting worse and worse...whether it's the use of obscenities; the hysterical rantings -- found everywhere -- on television -- think Olbermann here (who i hear just got a whopping salary increase into the millions) -- in the newspapers, on the Internet, on the radio; we seem to be surrounded by people who shout and rave and use exclamation points...

Anyway, guess I'll have to be retiring the use of "The Zero"...back to "Obama." That will be my one small, token move to turning down the volume...

531 Maui Girl  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 6:40:56pm

Yawn.

And oh yeah, Obama is NOT the first "black" president. He's half-white after all. How convenient for people to ignore that fact. He's absolutely african-american. Get it right for crying out loud.

/rant off

532 DANEgerus  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 7:33:49pm

First of all... I don't find the 'player of the race card' credible nor do I grant to anonymous sources any more credibility regarding their claims to that victimhood.

Second of all... that being said. You would think a Soros-funded race-baiting Marxist racial supremacist shouldn't be surprised if the most corrupt election in history didn't annoy a few folks.

533 Ezekiel2517  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 7:36:34pm

Dog Bites Man story if ever there was one.

534 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 7:58:50pm

It is extremely important that no harm come to Obama, ever. The government should spend whatever they have to spend to ensure that he is invulnerable.

The country will be horribly wounded if Obama is successfully attacked, now or ever.

I believe he is not well-suited to this office. I believe the last several presidents were not well-suited either. I want him to be a one-term president. Then he can join the loyal opposition where he will be more comfortable; with the usual Secret Service protection for ex-presidents, x5 if needed.

I am confident that he will defeat himself as president. Not pleased, not complacent, not self-confident, but confident nevertheless. The nation will survive. He will be a valuable voice thereafter.

I wish that our first black president had been a kick-ass motherfucker instead of this hollow man. The black, and the female, kick-ass motherfuckers are out there. So are the asians, and hispanics, and white males, or any other part of our country. It's just that, the system we have tends to reject them all.

We end up with cartoon characters, instead of brilliant achievers.

How low do you have to sink to be elected president?

How to change this?

535 savarulz  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 8:47:16pm

I agree with everything you say. The difference between conservatives,(not rinos)
are, we may not like or even agree with the pres elect. we will at least
stand by them for the good of the country.

536 savarulz  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 8:56:26pm

re: #534 Wm T ShermanIf you think this is a low on how Pres elect Obama got elected, just remember that he is the first media elected President.

537 dammad[deleted]  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 9:01:27pm
538 Challenger  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:11:38pm

The media have perpetuated and nurtured a culture of hate against President Bush and by extension any President. It's become personal and perfectly OK to spew violent nonsense against the other side or even make fantasy movies about it. They only notice this despicable creation when there's a democratic President elect. Well? How about standing up for some decent and adult behavior.

539 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Nov 15, 2008 10:20:57pm

re: #536 savarulz

If you think this is a low on how Pres elect Obama got elected, just remember that he is the first media elected President.

What?

540 One_Shot_One_Kill  Sun, Nov 16, 2008 4:36:29am

It reminds me of the wave of anti-Muslim violence that swept the nation immediately after 9/11.
/

"The principle is very simple," said BJ Gallagher, a sociologist and co-author of the diversity book "A Peacock in the Land of Penguins."

"If I can't hurt the person I'm angry at, then I'll vent my anger on a substitute, i.e., someone of the same race."

"We saw the same thing happen after the 9-11 attacks, as a wave of anti-Muslim violence swept the country. We saw it happen after the Rodney King verdict, when Los Angeles blacks erupted in rage at the injustice perpetrated by 'the white man.'"

541 proud to be an infidel  Sun, Nov 16, 2008 6:35:12am

re: #508 Charles

Wow. Well, obviously an adult had them chanting that. Isn't Rexburg an LDS area?

In reference to the article about the school kids in Rexburg chanting assassinate Obama.

Charles, what bothers me about this is the way the far-left condemns this kind of attitude (I agree with them there) but yet puts ALL type of dissent against Obama in the category of right-wing hatred that is a danger to this country.

One of the bloggers below this article mentioned examples of how some of the folks in this particular county were poisoning the minds of their kids by telling them how disappointed they were that Obama was elected. I say, of course you're going to be disappointed when the other guy whom you didn't support wins. There is nothing unreasonable about that but that's certainly a far cry different than wishing death upon him!

What REALLY ticked me off was when one of the other bloggers below that article condemned this attitude and blamed it on right-wing religious nuts teaching hatred to their children (He seemed to put ALL conservative Christians in that category) but then went on to justify all of the vitriol and hatred towards Bush because he was such a bad president who "raped the Constitution, promoted torture, illegal wiretaps", yadda, yadda, yadda same old left-wing crap. THAT seemed to be the general theme among MOST of the bloggers who commented on that article.

So how EXACTLY do you respond to people like that because this is exactly what us conservatives are going to hear from the left for the next 4, maybe 8, years (Please help me here, I'm not very eloquent with words like you are)?

542 kansas  Sun, Nov 16, 2008 7:32:50am

I would be more worried about the conspiracies we don't hear about. Of course the Nazi nuts are worrisome, but more worrisome to me would be a foreign entity doing something which would throw the country into turmoil.

543 reddragon  Sun, Nov 16, 2008 10:23:21am

#515they ran away with both houses of Congress and the White House and who knows if ever again we'll see another republican in the White House or in a majority of either legislative arm, not for 20 years at least, IMHO

"WE hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, That among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these Rights, governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.- That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it............ " Excerpt from The Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776.

Written by our founding fathers, men branded as traitors and secessionist, but patriots of the cause of independence. We have come a long way, the wrong direction in many minds, from the ideas upon which this country was formed.

We can't, DARE NOT, wait 20 years to get back to the basics. It has to start now with backing candidates that appreciate the Bill of Rights and the Constitution., with letting those we have elected know we are the ones that put them up there and can take it back just as quickly, with civil disobedience and protest, and writing the President, Senator and Representatives to voice our opinion.

We have what we have but the transition of power must be free of violence and we have to work harder to overcome those that would see it differently.

544 Cutty Sark  Sun, Nov 16, 2008 10:44:34am

# 542 .....do we really have to worry about "a foreign entity " to put this country in turmoil , when our own politicians seem to have already accomplished this ?

545 Emery Calame  Sun, Nov 16, 2008 12:17:33pm

The way I figure it, some of the threats are fake(meaning they are trumped up or hoaxes), some are hot air(like the nearly ubiquitous Bush killing rhetoric) and some are probably real (meaning they are threats were made in a serious context and do reflect a sincere desire to intimidate, hurt, or kill someone).

I think that Obama's presidency will be a disaster either for the people who voted against him (who will claim that he took more of their liberty than anyone before him) or for the people who voted for him (who will claim that he failed to bring the change that he promised). I don't there exists a happy medium between the two extremes that can hope to satisfy or even not offend both sides. I don't think the either the fickle, "independent," issue-oriented, centrist, moderates or the angry, punitive/protest, crossover voters exist in numbers that can fortify a middle bi-partisen president throughout his term. They are generally rather whimsical tie breakers whose relevance (and interest in politics, frankly) quickly fades after the election is done with. They will go back to serenely pretending that they do not watch Reality TV and clipping coupons.

If Obama were assasinated by anyone for any reason it would be a horrible hideous thing for this country, for his family(he has a wife and two kids), and it would futher separate and demoralize everyone probably for the next twenty years. If Obama were impeached for relatively minor issues and public distaste we would see similar effects. And we are not the only likely to see an attack coming from some racist or politcal extremist in this country. There are also foreign threats, crazies (remember Hinkly?), "suicide by cop" types, attention seekers, organized criminal retaliation, etc. Even if it were a hostile terrorist attack or the openening shot of a war we would not easily recover from an assasination. Even a failed attempt might prove very costly to us.

We cannot benefit from any event that costs the American people their faith in the fairness and stability of the American political system. Without our faith in the health and legitimacy of our system we are not at all far away from coups, riots, pogroms, madness, civil war, jacobinite terror, anarchy....the list goes on. The country as we know it will likely prove much harder to put together again that it is to tear apart. We also cannot benefit from any event that disorganizes or weakens the resolve of those who are charged with running the nation.

If Obama should die in office due to some disease or an accident it would probably still prove catastrophic and demoralizing. In fact if he did not die at all and had to leave office because of health issues or just because he was not in a position to lead (say because he required pain medication that affected his judgement over a long recovery period or had psychiatric or neurological problems) we, as a nation, would all suffer for it.

The obvious point here is that we should not wish for any sort of real harm to befall the president whether we like the president or not. To do so is to wish harm on ourselves. Nor when harm does occasionally befall an American president should we EVER feel liberated from those cultural contraints that discourage us from celebrating it. Instead we should extend our solemn and sympathetic condolences and take part in the shared misery that should accompany the ruination of loss of any human life. Obama is not my enemy. He is certainly my opponent regarding my interests in the world of politics and there is much about him that concerns and irritates me and strikes me as distasteful. But he is not my enemy.

546 Emery Calame  Sun, Nov 16, 2008 12:22:32pm

I think that Obama will probably try some authoritarian socialist bullshit (most likely in the form of more scary government letters, lawsuits, and fines than more visible police beatings and jailings) and that it will cause a very ugly political scuffle and I don't know how that will come out. I also think some of his followers will, with or without any authorization on his part, attempt to be his thugs and they will cause some serious problems. I doubt Obama will be very comfortable with the idea of forcefully reigning them in or chastizing them as doing so will link him to them.

I also think that Obama's plans and policies will generally not work out and that we will be contantly told that they will work or are already working or need more time, money, or energy to work out. I suspect a "vast rightwing conspiracy2.0" will be trotted out to "esplain" why stuff doesn't work or why people FALSELY AND IGNORANTLY BELIEVE that it isn't working. "Change" is too blank a check that can be used to justify way too much.

But we really should have though of that before we elected him or perhaps even before we picked John McCain to run against him.

The fcat remaisn that the policy accumen of Obama is now all that stands between us and our foreign enemies and their efforts or intimidate, control, and harm us (and our allies). It's entirely possible that, as he observes how the real world works, Obama will not continue to be attracted to easy, "intellectual," populist answers enshrined in tired, 19th century, leftist dogma. It's possible that he will not become mired, like FDR, in an endless gratuitous prgamatist experiment to find just the right settings for "the American engine". Unfortunately it's entirely possible that history(in the unpleasant sense of the word) will come looking for him and force him to develop sensible and serious stabilizing policies.

It's also possible that he'll turn out to be a flake or a lightweight or choose to preside as one of those "weaken America so we can join the world community as an equal" post-sovereignty types.

We need to be very aware of his mistakes as he makes them so we can criticize them in a rational manner, and to support him enthusiastically when he does what we think is the right thing. We probably also need to remember to vote him out in four years unless he actually turns out to be the gentle, great souled, unifying light worker genius he is made out to be who coaxes the Democrats back to sanity and the Republicans back to that whole small government privatization thing they sort of forgot about once the spot-light hit them.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

You gonna eat that potato?


The Beatles Are Here. Reissues and Rock Band.