Overnight Open Thread
Open | Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:59:17 pm PST
No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.
— Mark Twain
Show top rated links | LinkViewer
Open | Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:59:17 pm PST
No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.
— Mark Twain
1115 comments
3![]() |
Nightwatch Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:04:20pm |
Just fine this is, now about my thread to fix my tore pocket?
4![]() |
Racer X Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:04:44pm |
I really like pumpkin pie. With vanilla ice cream.
6![]() |
Silhouette Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:06:45pm |
Ultimately property rights and personal rights are the same thing.
Calvin Coolidge
7![]() |
Nightwatch Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:07:10pm |
What say you all,
Fine chat about the world of .......
8![]() |
solomonpanting Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:07:17pm |
No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.
— Mark Twain
First, do no harm.
10![]() |
Floral Giraffe Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:08:22pm |
"Hain't we got all the fools in town on our side? And ain't that a big enough majority in any town?"
Mark Twain
11![]() |
Nightwatch Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:09:33pm |
re: #8 solomonpanting
That's something from the HIP-OATH, is it not?
14![]() |
solomonpanting Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:11:52pm |
re: #11 Nightwatch
That's something from the HIP-OATH, is it not?
Yes, but applies as much to politicians.
15![]() |
Karridine Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:13:26pm |
re: #14 solomonpanting
And remember, the Hippocratic Oath has NOT been required of practicing doctors for decades now...
16![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:14:25pm |
How do you say "pussy" in Hindi?
But what angered Mr D'Souza almost as much were the masses of armed police hiding in the area who simply refused to shoot back. "There were armed policemen hiding all around the station but none of them did anything," he said. "At one point, I ran up to them and told them to use their weapons. I said, 'Shoot them, they're sitting ducks!' but they just didn't shoot back."
As the gunmen fired at policemen taking cover across the street, Mr D'Souza realised a train was pulling into the station unaware of the horror within. "I couldn't believe it. We rushed to the platform and told everyone to head towards the back of the station. Those who were older and couldn't run, we told them to stay put."
The militants returned inside the station and headed towards a rear exit towards Chowpatty Beach. Mr D'Souza added: "I told some policemen the gunmen had moved towards the rear of the station but they refused to follow them. What is the point if having policemen with guns if they refuse to use them? I only wish I had a gun rather than a camera."
[Link: www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk...]
Maybe the Indian government should send their police on rotations through Iraq - the police there have learned to fight back.
17![]() |
solomonpanting Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:14:57pm |
re: #15 Karridine
And remember, the Hippocratic Oath has NOT been required of practicing doctors for decades now...
Why doesn't that comfort me?
18![]() |
BlueCanuck Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:16:06pm |
re: #14 solomonpanting
I wish. the loyal opposition up here *spit*, is upset with the government because they didn't open the bank vault to spend lavishly for bailouts. going to be trying to form a coalition to topple the RECENTLY elected government. I think we will be going to the polls again in the new year.
/I hate liberals and leftists.
19![]() |
Yankee Division Son Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:16:45pm |
Great quote. I love Twain quotes...
"History has tried hard to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians. Now, to go and stick one at the very head of the government couldn't be wise."
- Mark Twain, New York Herald, 8/26/1876
20![]() |
JCM Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:17:11pm |
re: #17 solomonpanting
Why doesn't that comfort me?
In Oregon treatment has been denied, and "assisted suicide approved for patients.
21![]() |
Karridine Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:18:28pm |
re: #17 solomonpanting
Why doesn't that comfort me?
Because it wasn't done for YOUR benefit, Solomon, but for the aching consciences of the good doctors: (Wikipedia says)
In the 1970s, cultural and social forces induced many American medical schools to abandon the Hippocratic Oath as part of graduation ceremonies, usually substituting a version modified to something considered more politically up to date, or an alternate pledge like the Oath or Prayer of Maimonides.
22![]() |
shanec99 Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:19:03pm |
re: #16 karmic_inquisitor
How do you say "pussy" in Hindi?
[Link: www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk...]Maybe the Indian government should send their police on rotations through Iraq - the police there have learned to fight back.
Only because in Iraq, if the police didn't fight the terrorist their families would have been in danger and many died. Danger and survival has a way of clarifying the most obscure issues. The families of those Indian policemen were under no such threat.
24![]() |
Desert Dog Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:27:08pm |
I've always loved being a guinea pig. I just downloaded and installed Mozilla Minefield, the new beta that is going to replace Firefox....it's pretty fast! Has anyone else tried it?
25![]() |
Silhouette Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:28:28pm |
re: #23 SurferDoc
The Hippocratic Oath specifically prohibits abortion.
And the dropping of it is now crystal clear
I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.
28![]() |
solomonpanting Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:36:50pm |
Mine eyes are heavy. See/talk to you all another time.
29![]() |
BlueCanuck Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:39:38pm |
re: #27 Desert Dog
Nope, just working and link diving at the moment. Have nothing exactly pithy to say.
30![]() |
Desert Dog Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:41:41pm |
re: #29 BlueCanuck
Nope, just working and link diving at the moment. Have nothing exactly pithy to say.
I am stumbling, waiting for my 17 year old to get home...he's got 20 mins before the evil specter of "car restrictions" hit
31![]() |
Shiplord Kirel Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:41:51pm |
The Puritans who banned Christmas in the 17th century have generally been vilified as dour killjoys in the years since, but I am really starting to think they were onto something.
People have complained about the materialism, drunkenness, and commercialization of the holidays for centuries but these have reached truly unprecedented and disgusting extremes in recent years, with the oafish behavior of greedy shoppers adding to the revulsion any civilized person would feel at the spectacle.
The death of a young Wal-Mart employee, trampled by a crazed mob of barbaric materialists Friday morning, was absolutely the last straw.
We don't quite have the same power as the Puritan fathers to ban these hijacked holidays outright, but we can put an end to any official celebrations, including paid days off and official decorations, proclamations, etc.; and we can refuse to participate individually.
Dr. Seuss's biased propaganda gave only one side of the story; THE GRINCH WAS RIGHT!
33![]() |
BlueCanuck Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:42:40pm |
re: #30 Desert Dog
Ah yes, the days of youth. How I miss them.
/not, youth is wasted on the young. ;)
35![]() |
BlueCanuck Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:44:48pm |
re: #31 Shiplord Kirel
Wow, you are really in a Grinch mood this year. I was just starting to get in the mood of the season too for once.
36![]() |
rancher Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:48:09pm |
Walmart should pay a substantial compensation to this man's family for failing to protect his life from these animals. There also should have been more police there to arrest those interfering with the attempt to resuscitate him. Just more proof that there are too many people in this world. 12 MILLION people went hungry in the USA this year yet these animals will trample a young man to buy some cheap crap. Sick.
[Link: www.broadbandreports.com...]
////Yep its Walmarts fault the doors were torn down they should pay substantial compensation.
37![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:48:18pm |
From this
Asif Ali Zardari, the President of Pakistan, yesterday appeared on Indian television in an attempt to defuse tensions. 'As President of Pakistan, if any evidence comes of any individual or group in any part of my country, I shall take the swiftest action in the light of evidence and in front of the world,' he said.
Joke. Evidence already exists. Multiple pieces of evidence. In fact, not reported evidence exists yet of any other country (including India herself) being implicated.
Analysts said that the omens did not look good for the peace process between India and Pakistan. 'I expect a very difficult time ahead,' said Tariq Fatemi, a former Pakistani ambassador to Washington. 'Anything short of a real and genuine effort to co-operate by Pakistan would send very, very bad signals - not just to India but to the US and to Europe too.'
Not that the US or Europe will do anything, having had the longstanding policy of "don't piss off the moderates and make them into extremists too" in place.
Here is an alternative plan - take out the terrorists where you find them and ignore Pakistani protests by telling them they have lost control of their country. If that makes "moderates" into "extremists" then it makes for total war, which is something we are quite good at.
38![]() |
Shiplord Kirel Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:49:06pm |
re: #34 Racer X
A little extreme dontcha think?
Killing somebody in the rush to buy presents is pretty extreme too, and it is not the only example. Christmas traffic is a notorious source of mayhem, terror, and sudden death this time of year:
Swarms of demonically controlled metal monsters invade the streets of the city. They roar and scream and paw the ground, seeking the destruction of every living thing. They compete and jostle and collide, sometimes destroying each other in their reckless lust for human blood.The toll mounts and the authorities, outnumbered hundreds to one, are helpless to stem the onslaught. The hideous spectacle strikes fear and revulsion into the hearts of every rational being.
Those who value their lives take refuge where they can. They huddle in fear, and pray in silent despair for divine intervention to strike the monsters down and end the nightmare.
A new Stephen King novel? A bad science fiction scenario?
Nope, just Lubbock traffic during the Christmas season.
39![]() |
BlueCanuck Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:50:07pm |
re: #32 SurferDoc
Ava Gardner, Robert Walker. Can't really name the third person.
/cheated and used IMDB.
40![]() |
Fenway_Nation Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:53:23pm |
You have to wonder what makes these subhuman creatures tick. The politically correct assumption seems to be that the gunmensubhumans in Mumbai were poor, brainwashed little waifs who ordinarly wouldn't hurt a fly until they fell in with the wrong crowd at your no-so-friendly not-so-local madrassa or mosque.
I'm not saying there isn't some truth to the 'fell in with the wrong crowd' line of thinking, but don't you think that on some level, they're firing AK-47s and tossing grenades at horrified onlookers because they wanted to for the longest time? Snorting coke and blowing your paycheck at the racetrack because of peer pressure is one thing, but methodically planning and executing a mass-murder spree isn't exactly one of those things you could simply chalk up to peer pressure.
I mean, I'd like to think if any of us so much as contemplated doing something terrible, there'd be some sort of internalized mechanism to make us pause, maybe reconsider our actions: i.e. the little angel on your shoulder admonishing you 'This is wrong and you know it!' or whatever. On the other hand, these vermin went out of their way to make sure they did something awful- a caustic brew of nihilism and narcicism with perhaps some spiritual trappings (the fact that they may have had some Imam or mullah's blessing is simply a bonus for them). Nobody held their hands and guided them ashore or through the train station or the hotels or the Chabad house- that was their decision....one that was (at elast) many months in the making.
41![]() |
Racer X Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:56:12pm |
re: #38 Shiplord Kirel
Then we should ban rock concerts too right?
What happened is tragic and steps should be taken to insure it does not happen again. I'm not ready to advocate banning Christmas over it.
42![]() |
SurferDoc Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:58:05pm |
re: #39 BlueCanuck
Ava Gardner, Robert Walker. Can't really name the third person.
/cheated and used IMDB.
That's why I said three. ;)
I only knew three of them. Dick Haymes was the other guy.
43![]() |
Desert Dog Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:58:35pm |
I think the death at the Walmart in NY will make the stores handle the "doorbuster" sales differently. 2000 people in that line when the doors opened up. The store should have had them in a more orderly queue. It looked like a free for all....what a tragic outcome.....
44![]() |
Desert Dog Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:59:14pm |
re: #42 SurferDoc
Who was the other lady? Ava Gardner was damn sexy when she was younger!
45![]() |
rancher Sat, Nov 29, 2008 11:59:21pm |
What's really sad about the Wal-mart death is police were on scene at 0355 trying to calm things down but at 0500 when it opened no black and whites in sight. [Link: www.nytimes.com...]
And the unions say it was avoidable likely because walmart is non Unionized. Security barriers would have stopped it according to the Local grocer's 1500. Like security barriers would have stopped the approximately 2000 people striving to be the first ones in.
46![]() |
Racer X Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:00:17am |
re: #43 Desert Dog
If I was the manager of that store I would have hit the fire alarm and sent everyone out empty handed.
47![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:00:33am |
re: #42 SurferDoc
Have to listen to it again. Beautiful music. Read the plot synopsis on IMDB, and realized that the movie "Mannequin" was an 80's remake of this movie. Except without the music.
48![]() |
Fenway_Nation Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:00:55am |
Don't some retailers with the 'doorbuster' sales pass out a slip of paper with a number on it so that you go in when your number's called instead of everyone stampeding for the door all at once?
49![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:01:19am |
What needs to be done is stopping the 1/2 day and 1 day sales on Black friday and apply a smaller more moderate discount spread out over a longer period of time.
50![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:02:46am |
re: #45 rancher
What's really sad about the Wal-mart death is police were on scene at 0355 trying to calm things down but at 0500 when it opened no black and whites in sight. [Link: www.nytimes.com...]
And the unions say it was avoidable likely because walmart is non Unionized. Security barriers would have stopped it according to the Local grocer's 1500. Like security barriers would have stopped the approximately 2000 people striving to be the first ones in.
No... the higher prices and lower service that unions bring would have stopped the stampede, not any kind of barriers...
/heh [kinda]
51![]() |
Desert Dog Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:03:16am |
re: #48 Fenway_Nation
I went to a BestBuy sale last year. They had it roped off and had some big dudes making sure everyone behaved. It would have be scary in that mob at Walmart. Anytime you get a rush like that, someone gets hurt or worse.
52![]() |
SurferDoc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:03:24am |
re: #44 Desert Dog
Who was the other lady? Ava Gardner was damn sexy when she was younger!
After lightning fast late night googling--it is Olga San Juan! I never would have guessed that.
53![]() |
Silvergirl Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:04:33am |
re: #31 Shiplord Kirel
The Puritans who banned Christmas in the 17th century have generally been vilified as dour killjoys in the years since, but I am really starting to think they were onto something.
People have complained about the materialism, drunkenness, and commercialization of the holidays for centuries but these have reached truly unprecedented and disgusting extremes in recent years, with the oafish behavior of greedy shoppers adding to the revulsion any civilized person would feel at the spectacle.
The death of a young Wal-Mart employee, trampled by a crazed mob of barbaric materialists Friday morning, was absolutely the last straw.We don't quite have the same power as the Puritan fathers to ban these hijacked holidays outright, but we can put an end to any official celebrations, including paid days off and official decorations, proclamations, etc.; and we can refuse to participate individually.
Dr. Seuss's biased propaganda gave only one side of the story; THE GRINCH WAS RIGHT!
I don't think so! Are we going to get rid of all sport events because fans sometimes go crazy? Get rid of cars because of accidents? We cold make quite a list on that theme. Christmas is already on the endangered list. Don't even talk like that.
54![]() |
SurferDoc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:04:51am |
re: #47 BlueCanuck
Have to listen to it again. Beautiful music. Read the plot synopsis on IMDB, and realized that the movie "Mannequin" was an 80's remake of this movie. Except without the music.
Right. This one was all over television in the fifties.
55![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:04:55am |
re: #45 rancher
Stuff like this has been going on for decades at least. Remember the mania surrounding the Cabbage Patch dolls? Something could have been done better, and next year probably will be. I think though that it should require educating the masses, or prohibiting late night line ups/camp outs on the dawn of a big sale or new highly anticipated product release.
56![]() |
Fenway_Nation Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:05:58am |
re: #51 Desert Dog
Heh....I'm thinking Deli, you're thinking hard-to-get-into Nightclub.
Either way, that's better than telling 2000 people 'Have at it!' and try and cram into maybe two doorways simultaneously.
57![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:06:41am |
Did you hear about the newest radio station in Cincinnati? It's WKRP!
58![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:07:02am |
re: #54 SurferDoc
I have to find me a fifties type of girl. They seemed so much more sophisticated back then. And the way they looked . . . . . *swoon*
59![]() |
Shiplord Kirel Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:09:54am |
re: #53 Silvergirl
I don't think so! Are we going to get rid of all sport events because fans sometimes go crazy? Get rid of cars because of accidents? We cold make quite a list on that theme. Christmas is already on the endangered list. Don't even talk like that.
Sporting events lead to some localized insanity and occasional small-scale riots (unless you're in Europe), rock concerts sometimes kill a few people who actually show up, but Christmas turns millions into lunatics for a whole month.
60![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:10:54am |
Argh! I hate winzip!
Anybody know how to work this infernal piece of crap called WinZip?
[Why do I always start fiddling with my computer at three in the morning? Gotta stop doing this...]
61![]() |
Fenway_Nation Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:12:00am |
re: #58 BlueCanuck
I hear ya....contrast a Bettie Paige or Jayne Mansfield with a Amy Winehouse or Brittney Spears or whatever greased-up skank d'jour the entertainment industry's trying to unload on us.
63![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:13:20am |
re: #59 Shiplord Kirel
Sporting events lead to some localized insanity and occasional small-scale riots (unless you're in Europe), rock concerts sometimes kill a few people who actually show up, but Christmas turns millions into lunatics for a whole month.
Those folks are always lunatics. Christmas just gets them all to congregate at the mall, instead of leaving them spread out through the whole town.
64![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:14:20am |
65![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:14:54am |
re: #60 stevieray
Argh! I hate winzip!
Anybody know how to work this infernal piece of crap called WinZip?
[Why do I always start fiddling with my computer at three in the morning? Gotta stop doing this...]
/highlight the .zip file you want to unzip, select extract, and specify the target directory
66![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:15:27am |
re: #61 Fenway_Nation
Or dare I say it, Lucille Ball? I am sure she didn't sound that way in real life.
/well maybe not. Would have to depend on her personality I think.
67![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:17:14am |
re: #62 SurferDoc
Please state the nature of your Winzip emergency? ;)
It keeps grabbing a file I'm trying to download and install. It is apparently a compressed file, but it only needs to be "double clicked" from my desktop and it will self install, but my winzip keeps grabbing it and "helpfully" unzipping it and shoving it into an archive.
How do I make it stop?
68![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:18:25am |
[Link: new.music.yahoo.com...]
Britney feels old and boring... I wonder why?
69![]() |
LeePro Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:18:32am |
re: #58 BlueCanuck
I have to find me a fifties type of girl. They seemed so much more sophisticated back then. And the way they looked . . . . . *swoon*
Why, thank you, { { {Blue} } }!
With that, and my several more pounds of turkey, I bid you good-night, Blue.
Good-night, ALL! ! !
70![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:19:28am |
71![]() |
Silvergirl Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:19:56am |
re: #58 BlueCanuck
So many of the fifties guys' appeal was on the surface, or fleeting. Marlon Brando was so hot when he was young, and then he blimped out, like an even bigger 50's icon, Elvis. Rock Hudson, Montgomery Clift, handsome devils both, but only had eyes for the boys.
72![]() |
Fenway_Nation Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:20:26am |
re: #66 BlueCanuck
I was more of an Ethel kind of guy :P
Actually, my one hang-up about the classic 50's pin up is the apparent lack of Black/Hispanic/Aisan women featured in that medium.
/Celebrting diversity isn't just for metrosexual puss-o-crats!
73![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:20:51am |
re: #65 Killian Bundy
/highlight the .zip file you want to unzip, select extract, and specify the target directory
That's just it... I don't want it to unzip this file, but the little bastard can't keep its paws off of it!
74![]() |
SurferDoc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:21:47am |
re: #67 stevieray
It keeps grabbing a file I'm trying to download and install. It is apparently a compressed file, but it only needs to be "double clicked" from my desktop and it will self install, but my winzip keeps grabbing it and "helpfully" unzipping it and shoving it into an archive.
How do I make it stop?
See if you can find the file it is unzipping to. If you can't see it as it unzips, go to search and look for it by name.
75![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:21:51am |
[Link: news.yahoo.com...]
The MSM doesn't get it... they cant understand that you can't heal deathy.
76![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:22:04am |
re: #67 stevieray
It keeps grabbing a file I'm trying to download and install. It is apparently a compressed file, but it only needs to be "double clicked" from my desktop and it will self install, but my winzip keeps grabbing it and "helpfully" unzipping it and shoving it into an archive.
How do I make it stop?
/unzip the zip file, right click install on the .ini file
77![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:22:13am |
re: #69 LeePro
Night {LeePro}, weet dreams, and enjoy your Trytophan induced slumber.
78![]() |
Shiplord Kirel Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:22:33am |
I can rave all I like about the absurd spectacle of International Commerce Day Christmas, but you KNOW that I will be out getting presents for my grandchildren, among others.
The munchkins know that I am likely to show up with presents any time of the year, but they will still cry if there is nothing from Grandpa on Christmas morning.
I really wanted that saddled Triceratops from the Creation Museum for my grandson, but it is one-of-a-kind (for now) and they aren't letting go of it, at least not for any price that I would be willing to pay.
He also wants his own plane, but since he is only 7 and I am not filthy rich in any case, that will have to wait.
The granddaughter is a lot easier to shop for. I got her a giant Raggedy Ann/Andy dolls and some half size furniture to go with them. I gave her mom the same thing when she was 3, and she still has it.
79![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:22:35am |
re: #68 shanec99
[Link: new.music.yahoo.com...]
Britney feels old and boring... I wonder why?
Maybe if she would stop stealing her sheet music from old '70s TV shows, she wouldn't have such an old sound.
80![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:23:06am |
re: #73 stevieray
Have you checked the options in Winzip? And is the file a self extractor file as well?
81![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:23:37am |
re: #71 Silvergirl
So many of the fifties guys' appeal was on the surface, or fleeting. Marlon Brando was so hot when he was young, and then he blimped out, like an even bigger 50's icon, Elvis. Rock Hudson, Montgomery Clift, handsome devils both, but only had eyes for the boys.
Wasnt Rock Hudson married to Liz Taylor?
82![]() |
Crux Australis Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:23:47am |
83![]() |
SurferDoc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:25:02am |
re: #81 shanec99
Wasnt Rock Hudson married to Liz Taylor?
No, he is one of the few people who wasn't.
84![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:26:17am |
re: #73 stevieray
That's just it... I don't want it to unzip this file, but the little bastard can't keep its paws off of it!
You can only double click to install a .zip file if it's set up for automatic self-extraction/installation.
/unzip it and right click "install" on the .ini file
85![]() |
Silvergirl Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:26:36am |
re: #78 Shiplord Kirel
Right you are, and I bet you wouldn't knock someone down on the way into the store and stab them with a Triceratops horn on the way out.
86![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:29:51am |
OK... I'll hunt down the unzipped file and look for the .ini file. This is a self-extracting file, so it should self-install if I can keep winzip from pulling it apart and hiding it from me.
One of these days I'll learn to try these things when I'm awake.
87![]() |
Shiplord Kirel Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:31:39am |
re: #85 Silvergirl
Right you are, and I bet you wouldn't knock someone down on the way into the store and stab them with a Triceratops horn on the way out.
Probably not, but if there was only one Triceratops and some metrosexual knave seemed likely to get to it first......Well, you never know.
88![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:32:27am |
This thread needs some more music.
/love this video.
89![]() |
LeePro Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:32:28am |
90![]() |
traderjoe9 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:33:09am |
Bush Asking Olmert the Obvious
After Olmert updated Bush on Israel's indirect talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad, the U.S. president demanded, "Why do you want to give Assad the Golan for nothing?" the sources said.
"It's not for nothing," Olmert insisted. "It's in exchange for a change in the region's strategic alignment."
Bush persisted: "Why should you believe him?" And to that, Olmert did not reply.
Because he's a mind-numbing idiot, that's why.
91![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:33:26am |
re: #86 stevieray
OK... I'll hunt down the unzipped file and look for the .ini file. This is a self-extracting file, so it should self-install if I can keep winzip from pulling it apart and hiding it from me.
One of these days I'll learn to try these things when I'm awake.
If you link to the file I can tell you specifically what needs to be done. Ain't no ZIP file beaten me yet.
/if it's not too personal
92![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:34:33am |
re: #55 BlueCanuck
Yeah the point of 45 was that police had been on scene to calm things down and after seeing the way things were declined to keep presense at the store at 0500 when stuff was really gonna hit the fan.
Rustler btw all thru this thread so far Rancher is already in bed.
94![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:37:01am |
re: #90 traderjoe9
Bush Asking Olmert the Obvious
Because he's a mind-numbing idiot, that's why.
This makes me nervous. I have a friend who is leaving for Israel tomorrow to visit his family.
He'll probably be OK, but I'm worried about what could happen.
96![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:37:15am |
re: #92 rancher
Yeah the point of 45 was that police had been on scene to calm things down and after seeing the way things were declined to keep presense at the store at 0500 when stuff was really gonna hit the fan.
Rustler btw all thru this thread so far Rancher is already in bed.
Barbarians... trampple a man to death in order to buy some cheap Chinese made drawers at Wal-Mart.
Good grief.
98![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:40:17am |
99![]() |
Fenway_Nation Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:40:52am |
I actually made some inroads into my Christmas shopping over the summer. Doesn't hurt that the majority of my family members are going to wind up with gift cards.....
100![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:42:28am |
Holy crap! It worked!
I finally got that %$@*& widget into the %#@*^# sidebar!
Thanks SurferDoc, Killian, Blue, and Crux!
Tomorrow, I'll hunt through the WinZip tutorials and figure out how to work the program. It would be so much easier if I could get a self-extracting zipped file to just plop down on the desktop like any other download.
101![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:45:19am |
re: #91 Killian Bundy
If you link to the file I can tell you specifically what needs to be done. Ain't no ZIP file beaten me yet.
/if it's not too personal
Not too personal at all, just an ESPN widget I wanted to stick in my sidebar.
I don't know what it is about zip files... they always seem to confound me.
102![]() |
Silvergirl Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:45:58am |
103![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:47:44am |
Ellen DeGeneres' variety show aired tonight on TBS. It seemed to get a MUCH better response (I'll be curious to see the ratings) than Rosie O'Donnell's monstrosity.
I'd say the variety show may be ready for a comeback, but Rosie is on her way out.
104![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:48:12am |
105![]() |
Silvergirl Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:48:37am |
Is it lizard etiquette to say good-night instead of quietly disappearing?
Is the fruitcup a secret? So many questions, but it's fun discovering too.
106![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:48:38am |
re: #100 stevieray
Tomorrow, I'll hunt through the WinZip tutorials and figure out how to work the program. It would be so much easier if I could get a self-extracting zipped file to just plop down on the desktop like any other download.
Well, usually, advertised WinZip self-extracting files are just that.
/maybe try uninstalling and reinstalling WinZip clean
107![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:50:05am |
re: #101 stevieray
I don't know what it is about zip files... they always seem to confound me.
/hey, as long as you're happy
108![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:52:03am |
re: #105 Silvergirl
Is it lizard etiquette to say good-night instead of quietly disappearing?
Is the fruitcup a secret? So many questions, but it's fun discovering too.
The longer you've been around talking to your fellow lizards, the more it's appreciated if you say good night when you leave. That way, they don't keep trying to ask you questions after you're gone.
Fruitcup isn't really a secret. However, since it only shows up at 5:00 AM ET/2:00 AM PT, not a lot of daytime lizards know about it.
109![]() |
capitalist piglet Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:53:03am |
re: #20 JCM
In Oregon treatment has been denied, and "assisted suicide approved for patients.
The slope is slippery, huh? I'm so glad the Oregonians were all over television commercials in Washington state, telling us there was nothing whatsoever to be concerned about with an assisted suicide law. It's so easy to see where this could lead.
110![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:53:35am |
111![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:54:48am |
re: #100 stevieray
Well you should set your target when you are saving the file to the desktop. Me I send all mine to a Temp directory in My Documents. That way I can find all my downloads.
112![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:56:13am |
113![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:56:17am |
re: #100 stevieray
Try 7zip instead maybe I find I have much fewer problems using 7zip as it allows me to direct an old folder or creat a new on on desktop to extract too.
114![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:57:02am |
115![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:58:00am |
re: #113 rancher
See my #64. I found it years ago and have used it ever since. Free, works well, and will do files that back then winzip wouldn't touch.
116![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:58:00am |
re: #109 capitalist piglet
A relitive who has power of attorney could make a killing on this one
sarc. tag.
118![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:58:19am |
119![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:58:38am |
re: #106 Killian Bundy
I'll play with the settings tomorrow when I'm awake. Maybe that'll fix it -- I probably told WinZip to automatically do this when I installed it. Sigh. I'm mentally drained.
BTW... listening to WFAN sports-talk right now. Plaxico is getting ripped by everyone. I don't think he will survive this latest idiocy... the Giants will probably have to get rid of him. The fans are pissed. Looks like NYC will issue an arrest warrant for him come Monday.
120![]() |
ziggyelman Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:59:54am |
Greetings this early AM!Robert Byrd came up in the Lounge...So, while finding out how old he was, (91) I also found out his son in law is Iranian! Is this fairly comment knowledge? I sure didn't know about it!
[Link: www.mohammadmossadegh.com...]
121![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 12:59:59am |
re: #117 rancher
123 minutes bud :P
/so, until then, we'll all have to sit around and oddly stare at each other
122![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:00:24am |
re: #115 BlueCanuck
haha missed that one yeah I love 7-zip it does everything I need it to and more. It's much more user friendly for me which means unlike a lot of apple/microsoft programs it actually lets you make a decision instead of the program deciding everything.
123![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:02:36am |
124![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:02:41am |
re: #121 Killian Bundy
We are getting really in sync for some raeson KB first last night with the bannings now hte fruit cup :P.
Rustler
125![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:02:43am |
126![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:03:48am |
when L.O.L. comes in have her send me some over and out.
my boss (wifie) want to use her computer so i got to turn scaley tail and run.
127![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:03:55am |
re: #125 gmsc
Actually your right hehe I looked at time of post and forgot its in PST.
128![]() |
stevieray Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:04:27am |
The Lizard help desk is the best help desk on the intrawebz! I've asked questions on official help forums and gotten far less help than you guys just gave me... thanks again!
Now I can sleep the sleep of the sated... my widget has a home.
Goodnight all.
129![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:05:22am |
re: #125 gmsc
Yeah, I was wondering aboot that too. I think two people need more sleep, or more coffee. :)
130![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:05:44am |
re: #124 rancher
We are getting really in sync for some raeson KB first last night with the bannings now hte fruit cup :P.
Rustler
I have nothing better to do at 3:00 a.m. on Sunday morning.
/everything else is closed
131![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:07:59am |
re: #114 Killian Bundy
Not sure what 'fruit cup' is, but this is what we call it to be "fruit-bowled" in the business:
When your innards are on your out-side, you have been fruit-bowled. It looks like a bowl of fruit on your tummy. Icky I know, but when its the bad guys, e-f em.
132![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:08:23am |
Lol not lack of sleep I found this week old red fruitcup at teh desk and ate it and I do beleive fermented fruit plus reds special additives combine to make some super drug. :P
133![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:10:18am |
re: #132 rancher
Yeah, he got access to the Super Secret Fridge™ awhile back and ferments any left over fruitcup for the coming week. Just sit back and enjoy the trip. Probably the best trip we will get in the next four years.
135![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:12:35am |
re: #133 BlueCanuck
Not if my battle with the Va every bears fruit. If it does I should hopefully get back on the good stuff they had me on before making me get off it since I was forced into being an Avionics tech my last couple years in.
136![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:13:44am |
137![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:14:55am |
Now what good stuff they will put me on this time i have no clue but in Korea i was on 3 a day 800mg Methocarbonal.
138![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:18:58am |
re: #134 eddiespaghetti
Wrong link, idiot:
[Link: www.liveleak.com...]
/yeah, that was a 105 shot from an AC130, pretty good accuracy for arboirne artillery
139![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:22:35am |
re: #138 Killian Bundy
/yeah, that was a 105 shot from an AC130, pretty good accuracy for arboirne artillery
/alright, nevermind, it's a Prededator Hellfire shot, didn't look at the title, still looks like an AC130 105 hit
140![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:22:45am |
re: #138 Killian Bundy
Pretty sure it was a hellfire from a Predator / Reaper. Shot was probably taken from Nevada too.
142![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:24:46am |
143![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:24:55am |
Is the AC 130 what used to be called the Jolly Green Giant?
144![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:26:10am |
re: #140 eddiespaghetti
Pretty sure it was a hellfire from a Predator / Reaper. Shot was probably taken from Nevada too.
I've always thought that was so bizarre. The pilot is basically a man or a woman who is fighting in Iraq, yet is actually sitting in Nevada (or Washington, D.C., or...).
145![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:27:45am |
C-130, older than us all, is called the Hercules:
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
146![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:28:14am |
re: #140 eddiespaghetti
Pretty sure it was a hellfire from a Predator / Reaper. Shot was probably taken from Nevada too.
No you're right.
/there we're probably at least two drones, look at the incoming missile, it's probably not coming from the drone shooting the video
147![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:29:15am |
re: #144 gmsc
Creech AFB, north of Nellis (see Vegas). That is where all of the Predators / Reepers are guided out of. The terminal landing phase takes place in country.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
148![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:31:49am |
149![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:33:20am |
re: #147 eddiespaghetti
Creech AFB, north of Nellis (see Vegas). That is where all of the Predators / Reepers are guided out of. The terminal landing phase takes place in country.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
That makes it even better! I live close to Nellis AFB, so I know the area well!
150![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:33:50am |
re: #146 Killian Bundy
Your probably correct, the angle looks like the hellfire came from a different angle. Predators "lase" for other platforms. Sometimes "orgainic" (ie other predators) or sometimes "inorganic" (ie other platforms).
152![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:36:51am |
re: #148 Killian Bundy
Thank you. In future I will search information myself. I used to watch the Vietnam war every night on CBS. I thought the AC 130 went that far back.
153![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:38:36am |
re: #152 fiat_lux
It did! First use was on the Ho Chi Minh trail!
154![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:42:49am |
I confused the names. the Ac 130 was a modified C 130 Hercules with cannon and machine guns to attack ground targets, I remember. I forgot what is was called at the time.
155![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:42:51am |
Is it a full moon out tonight? Getting some real freaks, weirdos, and morons for some reason wandering about making my night a little too interesting.
156![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:43:40am |
re: #152 fiat_lux
Thank you. In future I will search information myself. I used to watch the Vietnam war every night on CBS. I thought the AC 130 went that far back.
It did. That's where the AC-47 "Spooky" was born.
/and evolved into the AC-130H Spectre
158![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:45:16am |
159![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:46:09am |
re: #148 Killian Bundy
Thats the Super Jolly KB the newer more modern version of the Jolly which was Nam era.
160![]() |
eddiespaghetti Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:47:19am |
161![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:47:19am |
re: #158 Killian Bundy
Amphibious in that it was use to stage amphibious assaults from UDT and Marines would go belly on the water to allow Zodiac deployment from rear ramp.
162![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:49:11am |
[Link: www.fas.org...] For specs on hte original Jolly Green Giant
163![]() |
Smilla Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:50:31am |
It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.
-Mark Twain
164![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:52:40am |
And there is nothing quite like watching an AC-130 plow a field with 105's. It's something i think we should demonstrate to the terrorists as a deterant. Another thing I love is the scream of an A-10 Thunderbolt as it starts its anti tank/anti AA runs. Just something about the psychological impact of the Spectre and Thunderbolt I love.
165![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:53:33am |
re: #161 rancher
Amphibious in that it was use to stage amphibious assaults from UDT and Marines would go belly on the water to allow Zodiac deployment from rear ramp.
That's interesting, pretty danderous for a helicopter manuever.
/don't they just usually jump 10-20 feet?
166![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:56:08am |
re: #163 Smilla
It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.
-Mark Twain
Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.
-Mark Twain
167![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:57:29am |
They can if thers a Zodiak already in the water but its kinda hard to dump one without losing a lot of specialized gear stowed aboard so For some heavily ladden ops ballsy pilots would belly up to the water open ramp and hte team could then shove the Zodi out the back hop in and take of much quicker than if they pushed the boat out then individually jumped out and swam to the craft.
168![]() |
Outrider Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:57:30am |
re: #156 Killian Bundy
It did. That's where the AC-47 "Spooky" was born.
/and evolved into the AC-130H Spectre
sometimes called Puff the Magic Dragon
169![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:57:55am |
re: #163 Smilla
The thread began with a Mark Twain quote and evolved into a a military hardware thread
170![]() |
FamHistoryGuy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:58:35am |
Someone say old music?
171![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:58:38am |
re: #168 Outrider
correct just like the A-10 Thunderbolt is often called teh Warthog, or Hog affectionately.
172![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 1:59:37am |
At least Ididn't start the topic flip flop but then again that's why it's an open thread.
173![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:00:04am |
Good morning, afternoon, evening *everyone*!™
Fruitcup is on the buffet --------------------->
Help yourselves!
174![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:00:31am |
re: #173 littleoldlady
Good morning, afternoon, evening *everyone*!™
Fruitcup is on the buffet --------------------->
Help yourselves!
Yum! Thanks!
Good morning, littleoldlady!
176![]() |
Outrider Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:01:03am |
re: #171 rancher
correct just like the A-10 Thunderbolt is often called teh Warthog, or Hog affectionately.
usually just called all of them fast movers. it was generally all we had on station for fixed wing
177![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:01:32am |
178![]() |
Fenway_Nation Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:02:05am |
You could almost set your watch to the fruitcuppage
179![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:02:20am |
gmsc! :-)
rancher! :-) (You or mini-You? ;-)
180![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:02:29am |
re: #168 Outrider
Outrider you are a genius! You have removed my confusion. It was Puff the Majic Dragon that I was think of. See # 143 by your personal polar bear
181![]() |
Erik The Red Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:03:02am |
re: #173 littleoldlady
Good morning, afternoon, evening *everyone*!™
Fruitcup is on the buffet --------------------->
Help yourselves!
Was feeling peckish thank you lol.
185![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:04:16am |
Its rustler Rancher is my relief at 0700 today so he may be on a bit around then.
187![]() |
FamHistoryGuy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:06:30am |
re: #154 fiat_lux
AC-47 = Puff/Spooky
AC-119 = Shadow
AC-130 = Specter
I have a cassette tape I made one night at Ubon of RAPCON doing controller training with a Specter on approach.
188![]() |
Outrider Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:07:38am |
re: #180 fiat_lux
Outrider you are a genius! You have removed my confusion. It was Puff the Majic Dragon that I was think of. See # 143 by your personal polar bear
Fact is, I used to hear them called Spooky more often than not though. Only heard Nam vets sometimes refer to it as Puff.
189![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:08:00am |
re: #187 FamHistoryGuy
All 3 are actually at times refered to as Puff do to the large puff of smoke from the sky associated with 105 fire.
191![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:09:29am |
Also from the ground many folks heard airforce talking about the AC-47 as spooky so associated all air artillary suppport as coming from the spooky bird etc.
192![]() |
Outrider Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:09:34am |
re: #187 FamHistoryGuy
AC-47 = Puff/Spooky
AC-119 = Shadow
AC-130 = SpecterI have a cassette tape I made one night at Ubon of RAPCON doing controller training with a Specter on approach.
don't think grunts ever made any kind of distinction between any of those when using names
193![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:09:58am |
re: #173 littleoldlady
Dear lady, I have been waiting for this.
196![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:12:22am |
fiat_lux! :-)
/he only loves me for my fruitcup...
re: #194 FamHistoryGuy
That song brings a tear - no matter what language I hear it in...
197![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:12:38am |
Morning littleoldlady, thanks for the fruitcup.
/back into lurk mode, busy with something. :)
198![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:12:42am |
199![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:13:37am |
re: #196 littleoldlady
fiat_lux! :-)
/he only loves me for my fruitcup...
There are some of us who like you for your discussion.
/The U.S. Constitution
/I only read it for the articles
200![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:14:44am |
re: #194 FamHistoryGuy
I thought that Yiddish was German for jewish. Learn something new everyday.
201![]() |
FamHistoryGuy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:15:50am |
re: #192 Outrider
I was USAF aircraft armament (bomb Loader)
AC-47 .50 cal and/or 7.62 minni gun
AC-119 20mm Gatling and 40mm BOFORS
AC-130 20mm Gatling, 40mm then 105mm Howitzer
202![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:15:57am |
203![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:17:00am |
204![]() |
Outrider Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:19:12am |
re: #201 FamHistoryGuy
I was USAF aircraft armament (bomb Loader)
AC-47 .50 cal and/or 7.62 minni gun
AC-119 20mm Gatling and 40mm BOFORS
AC-130 20mm Gatling, 40mm then 105mm Howitzer
that can sure toss a lot of metal downrange for sure.
205![]() |
FamHistoryGuy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:19:34am |
re: #200 fiat_lux
Yiddish is a language derived from Hebrew and German plus one or two other sources.
206![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:21:17am |
re: #200 fiat_lux
I thought that Yiddish was German for jewish. Learn something new everyday.
Jew in German is Juden.
Yiddish is a language spoken by the Jews of Europe (and Brooklyn ;-) with strong roots in the German language.
207![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:22:00am |
re: #204 Outrider
that can sure toss a lot of metal downrange for sure.
209![]() |
gmsc Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:23:17am |
re: #208 littleoldlady
And I'm the World's Slowest Typer...
I'm getting slow as a typer right now myself.
Good night, all!
210![]() |
Unboldened Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:24:12am |
Hello lizards.
Just writing a brief apology/explanation to those who responded to a post I made on Thursday's overnight (Moe Katz, Rancher, Fenway_Nation, Fat Bastard Vegetarian, and probably some others). I should have waited longer than 5 minutes before giving into my tummy and calling it a night. I honestly thought the thread was pretty dead, but it looks like I was wrong. =)
Some clarification:
I'm not a troll. On second reading, I realize how that post came across that way. I probably should have put more effort into my last sentence. What I wrote just happens to be an opinion I've had since we targeted Iraq in the war on terror. The basis for that opinion stems from the couple months I spent in the Middle East as a Marine on deployment there in 1997. Unfortunately, no matter how you cut it, a pizza delivery boy working his way through community college ('til 2003) doesn't have much political clout, so that post is the first time I've made any public statement about it, although I have shared it before during casual conversation even before Iraq officially started. I should have put more details into what I wrote, so I'll try to explain what I learned in my time there and how it brought me to my conclusion that the reasons we were expected to swallow weren't really why we went to war in Iraq.
1. In general, every faction in the Middle East hates every other faction... doesn't matter if it's a country, a sect, or what have you. They make alliances out of necessity or convenience, but you can expect them to go back to gnawing each other to pieces when the chance presents itself, that includes Iraq and its neighbors. Once I realized how deep that tendency ran, all of Saddam's grandstanding and playing with the UN inspectors made a lot more sense. As long as the West took him seriously, his neighbors wouldn't seriously consider him weak enough to infiltrate/invade/overthrow.
2. Despite Saddam's presence, Iraq was probably one of the weakest and most vulnerable countries in the region. It didn't have any significant alliances to lean on in case of trouble, was under heavy sanctions from the West, and had a significant population % waiting for a chance to fight back. When the US and others had to decide where to pro-actively prevent the spread of terrorism, I'm certain it was on the short list.
3. The WMD/AQ threat was spun by many politicians into a "real" threat instead of simply a threat that was within the realm of possibility, as indicated by the intel. The Dem quotes that Rancher put up are a good example. That was where I got pissed off. I expected maybe a small WMD cache (I'm still surprised none were found), and a few cases of AQ/terrorists spending the night inside the border. There were some instances of people who voiced a realistic opinion on the state of Iraq, but the politicians preferred the strong and stupid rhetoric and pretty much stuck with it.
Running out of characters, so here's the summary:
My main anger is about the way it was presented and justified. When I took my oath to defend the US, defense was the main reason. The idea of aggressive military action is acceptable, but not when the justification is so off kilter that a pizza boy with a couple months of less than ideal "intel" goes ~~ lolwut! QFT GTFO! o.0 ~~ I would be much less annoyed if my ~lowut~ thoughts had been completely false.
That doesn't mean that I blame the Bush admin for the poor representation of Iraq. As I recall, the nay sayers made a point of insisting on a simple yes/no problem instead of one that required thought. That's where I agree with the apparent decision to let the idiots and blow hards have their say as long as the war went forward. However, I think that the Bush admin did a poor job of creating public understanding of the reality. Instead, they let the morons determine the PR and the end result was damaging to US' rep abroad and the administration's rep at home.
Iraq War ->
Technical: A
PR: C-
Basically, I expected better. ;-)
211![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:24:28am |
re: #205 FamHistoryGuy
That is what I understood. I didn't think about the Russian contributions but it dies make sense.
212![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:27:27am |
re: #196 littleoldlady
Dear Lady, You have have been very gracious to me despite my initial insecurities and for that I am in your debt.
213![]() |
TheMatrix31 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:29:28am |
At my Uncle's house today, somehow my judge of character came up. My Mom didn't agree with my assessment of someone, and that my judge of character is horrible. I told her to look at my friends, and look at the people OTHER people associate with. I told her I'm a great judge of character, considering who I choose to associate myself with.
Then my Uncle steps in and randomly he said, so you have a good taste in food, bad taste in politicians, good taste in females.
I just smiled and said "Hey, you win some and you lose some."
214![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:29:38am |
That was where I got pissed off. I expected maybe a small WMD cache (I'm still surprised none were found),
Its really difficult to actually locate anything that may have been hidden in some areas of Iraq. The desert is great at hiding secrets a major excavation of one day can be erased over night and unless you have actually coordinates for where it was there will be no evidence to point you at where the WMD's could have been hidden.
219![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:33:03am |
222![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:34:21am |
223![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:37:21am |
Btw LoL i just have to ask do you play Everquest. Its my Escape from the real world and on my server is this nice conservative lady with the nic liloldlady.
224![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:40:46am |
re: #223 rancher
Who has time for games when there's LGF!?
;-)
Nope. Never even heard of it. There's quite a few of us "littleoldladies" out there, though.
/hey! we should form a club!
225![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:42:45am |
Was just wondering because preelection me and liloldlady were having some fun griefing obama nuts online alonmg with a couple other folks.
226![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:43:37am |
People:
I received this in an e-mail yesterday...............
nonic
_____________________________________
Big Bailouts, Bigger Bucks
Posted By Barry Ritholtz On November 25, 2008 @ 7:19 am In Bailouts, Markets, Taxes and Policy | 59 Comments
Whenever I discussed the current bailout situation with people, I find they have a hard time comprehending the actual numbers involved. That became a problem while doing the research for the [1] Bailout Nation book. I needed some way to put this into proper historical perspective.
If we add in the Citi bailout, the total cost now exceeds $4.6165 trillion dollars. People have a hard time conceptualizing very large numbers, so let’s give this some context. The current Credit Crisis bailout is now the largest outlay In American history.
Jim Bianco of Bianco Research crunched the inflation adjusted numbers. The bailout has cost more than all of these big budget government expenditures – combined:
• Marshall Plan: Cost: $12.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $115.3 billion
• Louisiana Purchase: Cost: $15 million, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $217 billion
• Race to the Moon: Cost: $36.4 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $237 billion
• S&L Crisis: Cost: $153 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $256 billion
• Korean War: Cost: $54 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $454 billion
• The New Deal: Cost: $32 billion (Est), Inflation Adjusted Cost: $500 billion (Est)
• Invasion of Iraq: Cost: $551b, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $597 billion
• Vietnam War: Cost: $111 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $698 billion
• NASA: Cost: $416.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $851.2 billion
TOTAL: $3.92 trillion
__________________________________________________ ____________________
data courtesy of Bianco Research
>
That is $686 billion less than the cost of the credit crisis thus far.
The only single American event in history that even comes close to matching the cost of the credit crisis is World War II: Original Cost: $288 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $3.6 trillion
The $4.6165 trillion dollars committed so far is about a trillion dollars ($979 billion dollars) greater than the entire cost of World War II borne by the United States: $3.6 trillion, adjusted for inflation (original cost was $288 billion).
Go figure: WWII was a relative bargain.
I estimate that by the time we get through 2010, the final bill may scale up to as much as $10 trillion dollars…
>
UPDATE: November 25, 23008 10:34am
A few additional details:
-Well regarded Jim Bianco did the number crunching. The easiest method is to recalculate the numbers using CPI data. There are other ways to depict this — such as percentage of GDP, or on a per capita basis, or in terms of costs of common items (eggs, bread, big macs, etc.).
[2] Bloomberg calculates the total amount the taxpayer is on the hook for is $7.76 trillion, or $24,000 for every man woman and child in the country. ([3] Data breakdown is here)
Regardless, no matter you calculate it, we are talking about an ungodly amount of money.
227![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:44:52am |
228![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:45:22am |
At least we got something out of the Louisiana Purchase...
/verybigsigh
'Morning, nonic! :-)
230![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:50:27am |
Should I introduce a new, controversial topic? 'Cause if if ya'll don't want to I won't.
231![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:51:13am |
re: #228 littleoldlady
Was not Illinois one of the things we got out of the Louisianna Purchase?
232![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:51:45am |
re: #230 fiat_lux
Should I introduce a new, controversial topic? 'Cause if if ya'll don't want to I won't.
Oy veh. You really ARE a n00bie! LOL!
233![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:52:13am |
re: #226 nonic
[2] Bloomberg calculates the total amount the taxpayer is on the hook for is $7.76 trillion, or $24,000 for every man woman and child in the country. ([3] Data breakdown is here)
Regardless, no matter you calculate it, we are talking about an ungodly amount of money.
That's assuming the economy goes into a depression and the government doesn't get anything back on it's investment.
/lighten up, fear, fear itself
234![]() |
Erik The Red Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:52:26am |
re: #230 fiat_lux
Should I introduce a new, controversial topic? 'Cause if if ya'll don't want to I won't.
Go for it. Beware the stick.
236![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:55:29am |
re: #228 littleoldlady
I promise you, we're going to get "something" out of this, too.
For years now, we've heard how Medicare and Social Security, a mere few hundred billion here and there, were going bankrupt with only dull hints at the consequences for the overall economy.
Think then, what effect this kind of indebtedness will have. Who could afford to rescue us, except the Saudis? On what terms?
We have been sold. Lock, stock, and barrel, as it were. And very few people seem to have noticed. And fewer seem to care.
237![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 2:57:11am |
239![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:03:30am |
re: #234 Erik The Red
Oh, man. Not the stick! I am brutilised as it is.
240![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:05:15am |
re: #236 nonic
The Saudis and the Chinese, yes. Not only that but we don't even own our hard property/assets anymore. They do.
We could save ourselves if we focused on what we do best - bring back manufacturing and innovate. But considering the kayikahs we have running the show in Washington and on Wall Street, it looks as though we're going to have to hit rock bottom before people figure it out.
243![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:12:24am |
Gah, got sucked into some tiding task on my LJ account. :p
/ad. . .oooh shiny
244![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:12:45am |
re: #226 nonic
Does that include citibanks new 20 billion on top of last weks 25?
245![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:15:13am |
re: #240 littleoldlady
bring back manufacturing
Good luck with that. People can be just as productive without bloated Unions.
/hey, how about some nice lesbian music Beatles?
246![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:22:57am |
re: #245 Killian Bundy
Who said anything about Unions?
And another thing...(are you SURE you don't want to introduce your "controversial subject", fiat_lux? Might put the brakes on MY ranting... ;-) ... all these mergers that are supposed to create economies of scale. BAH! They lay off a lot of low/mid level workers and put the extra money in the pockets of the executives.
/disgustipated!
247![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:23:00am |
[Link: money.cnn.com...]
"With credit cards, consumers spend 30% more (on purchases) than with cash," Dvorkin said.
Which generally means they spend 30% more than they can afford too.
"In general, using credit cards isn't a bad thing in itself." he said. "Just make sure you don't carry over any balance when you do."
Doesn't that mean spending the 30% less that you would have spent using cash.
248![]() |
akak Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:24:46am |
re: #240 littleoldlady
The Saudis and the Chinese, yes. Not only that but we don't even own our hard property/assets anymore. They do.
We could save ourselves if we focused on what we do best - bring back manufacturing and innovate. But considering the kayikahs we have running the show in Washington and on Wall Street, it looks as though we're going to have to hit rock bottom before people figure it out.
Your talking about nationbuilding vs the buck. The buck will win every time.
250![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:29:37am |
re: #247 rancher
One statistic we use in the financial company I am with is that in the States the average family has a negative savings rate over the year. In short, they are spending more then they are earning. It's a brutal cycle that once you get into it, it's hard to get out.
251![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:29:38am |
stopped over at one of my son's friends house shabbat afternoon seems my son's best friend went to school with the mumbay chabad rabbi who was murdered. the ortho jewish community can be a very small world
252![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:30:00am |
re: #249 yochanan
yochanan! :-)
Plenty. Help yourself ---------------------->
akak! :-)
It looks as though we're going to be engaging in nation rebuilding soon enough.
/or may as well throw in the towel now...
254![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:32:10am |
255![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:32:17am |
re: #246 littleoldlady
Who said anything about Unions?
American car companies, front line, epic fail.
/no tax dollars for massive bull[expletive deleted]
256![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:32:23am |
Truth is, I make car parts for the American working man because I'm a hell of a salesman and he doesn't know any better. Well, son, since you're no longer a shareholder, this is where I leave you. Don't feel bad. This chain of events was set in motion a long time ago, and you and bald-headed friend, you did what you could and that's commendable. Marty, have Security see these boys out.
Ray Zolinsky from Tommy boy.
Sounds kinda like the bail out there was a better quote in the movie about consolidating businesses but cant find it on-line anywhere unfortunately
257![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:33:28am |
re: #254 fiat_lux
The stick isn't to bad me and Killian got it hard in last nights open thread:P
258![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:35:37am |
rancher we learn to have thick scales around here sometimes for good reason sometimes not.
260![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:37:53am |
re: #257 rancher
But I am but a newbie.Would I be able to survive such a flagellation?
261![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:38:43am |
re: #250 BlueCanuck
One statistic we use in the financial company I am with is that in the States the average family has a negative savings rate over the year. In short, they are spending more then they are earning. It's a brutal cycle that once you get into it, it's hard to get out.
You can get out of it. But there's only ONE WAY out.
There's no "rebuilding" going to happen. That's not on the agenda.
262![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:39:54am |
Lol I'm such a newbie I don't even have my own nic : P
Still Rustler
263![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:44:02am |
re: #260 fiat_lux
How do you think we get tough scales to begin with?
/please sir, can I have another
//*WHACK*
264![]() |
SixDegrees Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:45:11am |
////Yep its Walmarts fault the doors were torn down they should pay substantial compensation.
They may be culpable if it's shown that they neglected to take obvious safety measures. And it sounds like that may be the case. Apparently, they heavily promoted this sale, setting the stage for a large crowd. And when the crowd arrived, they weren't controlled or organized in any way, despite knowledge from past sales that this might be a problem. Security officers - whether WalMart's or the local police isn't clear - expressed concern over the size and behavior of what was essentially a mob prior to opening. By this point, any attempt to "organize" the mob into lines would likely have been met with hostility, as members felt they were "losing" their place in the ad hoc lines which had formed.
Simply having the crowd form up into lines early on likely would have prevented this stampede, and it isn't unreasonable to expect WalMart to take such measures based on past experience and expectations.
If someone slips and falls on my icy front walk, I'm liable as the property owner and can be found negligent for not removing the ice or at least providing some type of warning. I think the same reasoning will be applied here, and WalMart's position looks pretty weak.
265![]() |
akak Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:50:00am |
re: #264 SixDegrees
Amazing how rude people are nowadays, even with lineups. A security guard would have to enforce - pathetic that it has come to that. Whenever I see it happening, Either walk away or go to end of line to try and avoid the anger.
266![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:50:22am |
re: #264 SixDegrees
There were City police there at least an hour before opening trying to restore order to the mob but by 0500 when doors were going to be opened but instead were torn down the local PD was not in sight. Holding Walmart responsible because an unruly mob broke down there doors is unacceptable. Retailers everywhere highly advertise their Black Friday sales. They also had hired additional security. The poor soul who was trampled was trampled because he and 7 others decided to try there strenth holding the doors while outnumbered 300 to 1 Walmart truely should not be responsible for his or the crowds decisions.
267![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:50:41am |
re: #264 SixDegrees
Absolutely agree. Wal-Mart set up the atmosphere for excitement and publicity, all to generate sales. Of course, they had responsibility to control and protect.
But it's my understanding they NEVER settle and will aggressively "defend" to destroy any plaintiffs.
268![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:53:47am |
re: #266 rancher
Unless of course management told them to hold the doors in which case Gloves off for the attorney's for the man's family.
269![]() |
Stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:53:50am |
re: #264 SixDegrees
Aboslute BS, I am sorry, there are doors on a store, those doors imply that the store is closed when those doors are locked. This crowd crushed the doors ans stampeded, that is NOT the fault of Wal-mart, that is the fault of an extremely selfish populace, one that is being taught a lack of personal responsibility at a very early age.
/grrrr
271![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:55:19am |
re: #266 rancher
"Walmart truely should not be responsible for his or the crowds decisions."
Oh, don't worry about Wal-Mart. The killed man was an agency temp employee. Wal-Mart will probably sue THEM out of business.
And it's not true that the crowd makes "decisions." Which is why in any incitement situation, it's the speaker or actor held responsible.
273![]() |
Stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:57:47am |
re: #267 nonic
No...every store in the nation was advertising these sales, as they do every year. When people get out of hand it is the FAULT of the people.
Sheesh, why is it that there is an automatic response to blame anyone but the people responsible for the atrocity? How is blaming wal-mart any different from blaming society for a murderer?
each and every individual in that crowd is responsible for the death of that poor soul, there is no excuse for what those people did and blaming it on the 'other' is only going to create more situations such as that.
274![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:58:09am |
The crowd may not have made any decision but the man trampled made the decision to try and hold back the swarm tho and his job was not as security for the store but rather as interim maintenance and restocking.
276![]() |
wahabicorridor Sun, Nov 30, 2008 3:59:30am |
good morning lizards.............
This is fun.....50 Strange Buildings in the World
(h/t Devel's Kitchen)
And this is sad....A Brit leaves in disgust
When we first thought about living in France, our motivation was the countryside, the climate, the pace of life and the French way of doing things. A love/hate relationship with France became more love than hate. In the meantime, my love for my homeland has descended into contempt. Contempt for a population that is so passive that it fails to hold its political class to account. The French will bring the country to a grinding halt if their politicians upset them. They are not always right, but their willingness to say “non!” has my admiration just as the willingness of the British to accept the erosion of our civil liberties with a shrug earns my utmost derision. I have watched in despair as the righteous have eaten away like a cancer at the things that made this nation so great, that made Britain a wonderful place to live. No longer are we free to speak our minds for fear of the industry so willing and ready to take offence, of the righteous who decide what is “acceptable” or not. Thought crime is becoming a reality in 21st Century Britain.
277![]() |
akak Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:00:41am |
re: #274 rancher
The crowd may not have made any decision but the man trampled made the decision to try and hold back the swarm tho and his job was not as security for the store but rather as interim maintenance and restocking.
self defence? How does the person know they won't be beaten to death?
278![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:00:56am |
re: #259 littleoldlady
Dear Ladyre: #259 littleoldlady
re: #259 littleoldlady
Dear Lady, my controversial subject is that I do not believe in evolution. I am not a creationist nor IDist. I do not think that the fossil evidence supports evolution and that there a myriad of questions that remain unanswered. I am not a chicken I just do not want to be sent to the cornfield.
279![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:01:31am |
re: #269 Stonemason
Then why do you imagine that every event, rally, concert, parade, etc., etc., employs security and crowd control?
280![]() |
Stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:03:04am |
re: #271 nonic
And it's not true that the crowd makes "decisions." Which is why in any incitement situation, it's the speaker or actor held responsible
But individuals within the crowd do make decisions. Are we really that weak as a species? What about the people that saw what was happening and managed to get out of the crowd? I have been in this type of crowd before, it is amazing, no one 'wants' do crush the front, they just do? NO, those that were around me in 1983, in Philly, after a concert, were laughing and making fun of the poeple in front of the mobbed who might be getting hurt at the Broad Street Subway. The doors were closed and people were fired up. I pulled my girlfreind out to the side.
Noone was killed that night, but each individual in the crowd has to make an individual decision at some point. Where does personal responsibility stop?
281![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:03:31am |
re: #277 akak
He had no business going to the doors to try and hold them up against that many people. 2000 people at an average weight of 140 lbs aech means that man was pitting himself against the weight of a train no self defence in that.
282![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:05:09am |
re: #279 nonic
There was increased security both at the walmart and at the mall the walmart was located. But unless you employ 1-2k extra guards for that one day its always going to be a losing battle.
283![]() |
littleoldlady Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:06:32am |
re: #278 fiat_lux
Okay. There are nearly daily threads for that.
/which I stay far, far away from...
You can bring it up there.
/and take your chances... ;-)
284![]() |
Killian Bundy Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:06:36am |
285![]() |
Stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:06:48am |
re: #279 nonic
Then why do you imagine that every event, rally, concert, parade, etc., etc., employs security and crowd control?
Because there are idiots in the world who feel that being a part of a crowd gives them the right to do anything they want, they can just blame it on the crowd.
Turning over a new van, as Phillies fans did after the W.S. win is wrong, no matter when it is done, and those individual knew that.
Excusing individual behavior as part of crowd mentality is to cheapen individual behavior, either we are free or we are not, these 'degrees' of individuality, especially the ones that excuse bad behavior, drive me insane.
/not noticable, is it?
286![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:07:17am |
Every Event has security because they are there to help the crowd make the right decision to be orderly but control often breaks and people end up hurt or killed as a result its not due to lack of security its lack of compassion from the crowd and the anonimity of the mob that causes the breaks
287![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:09:27am |
re: #284 Killian Bundy
I did .I will never bring it up again.
289![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:09:38am |
re: #273 Stonemason
It's highly unlikey that anybody but the first one or two even saw the guy on the floor. That's the definition of a mob rushing forward --- they can't see where they're going.
Personal responsibility works both ways, you know. You cannot CREATE a hazardous situation and then blame "the greedy mob" for responding.
These situations happened before, though apparently nobody was killed. That's called "prior notice." Wal-Mart knew what could happen. And they apparently didn't do enough to control and protect.
We could just turn every mall into a free-for-all. Sounds exciting, but I don't know how good it would be for business in general.
290![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:10:57am |
re: #276 wahabicorridor
good morning lizards.............
This is fun.....50 Strange Buildings in the World
(h/t Devel's Kitchen)
They forgot one, The OCAD Building in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
291![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:13:57am |
The mob and Walmart still have no bearing on the 8 employees who chose to try and pit the weight of 8 against 2000+ especially since they saw the security doors failing. Once again unless someone from Walmart management ordered them to hold the doors up, Walmart should not be liable for the decision of those 8 to stand up to the mob.
293![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:14:59am |
re: #292 akak
Hopefully it's quiet we don't need to play into the terrorists hands by doing what they want and allowing em to play the victim card.
294![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:16:57am |
re: #278 fiat_lux
i frankly don't give a tinkers damn on the whole subject, it will not put food on my table, or prevent that food from being stolen, spoiled, cost beyond my ablity to pay or blown up.
295![]() |
akak Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:16:59am |
re: #293 rancher
Hopefully it's quiet we don't need to play into the terrorists hands by doing what they want and allowing em to play the victim card.
The headline on Fox yesterday said "U.S concerned about Pakistan involvement".
Who was talking on behalf of U.S?
296![]() |
The Other Les Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:17:18am |
This is not the highest achievement of Western Civilization but I still like it.
297![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:19:37am |
re: #285 Stonemason
"Because there are idiots in the world who feel that being a part of a crowd gives them the right to do anything they want,"
EXACTLY. Plus, there are people swept up by the mob, regardless of their individual intentions. That part is called "the problem." What we're looking for here is called "solution," or prevention.
"Excusing individual behavior as part of crowd mentality is to cheapen individual behavior, either we are free or we are not,"
Lovely philosophical thought, and on that level, I agree with you.
But on a public, PRACTICAL level, I sure as hell don't want my kid going to a rock concert where the venue holds each and every free-soul individual up to his or her own noble self-responsibility and says screw the security, we'll pack the jury with Stonemasons.
298![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:20:30am |
Suspecting Involvement does not justify serious action unless that suspicion is backed by evidence which makes it highly likely the suspicions are true. Wait til the investigation is done before making any rash decisions. What happens if Paki had nothing to do with it but was merely scapegoated. Then we attack Paki someone else is found responsible and we look like jackasses.
300![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:20:44am |
re: #236 nonic
No we are not, the resources that the American government has easily covers the amount of debt we have, it is why we are a credit worthy nation.
If we were not then people would not continue to buy our government bonds. Here is why:
1. There would be a risk of us significantly devaluing our currency (by printing more to cover our debts) thereby reducing the value of our debts in real terms (at a loss to our creditors).
2. The greater risk of us defaulting on our debts and them losing all their investment.
Here is the real problem with the level of our debts:
1. It is expensive to finance, and money that we could be using to improve the infrastructure, invest in education etc. is being used to finance the debt. These are creating a drag on the economy and preventing the growth from maximising the potential and slowing the pace at which our standard of living can rise.
2. The second thing is, that in order to finance the debt we have to pay our creditors an attractive interest rate (oportunity cost), therefore the money that would otherwise be invested in companies to make them more productive, create new medicines or innovate to develop cheaper cars or more efficient means of generating power is being used to finance the debt, again reducing the rate at which our standard of living can improve.
The alarmists are wrong. The truth is that America can afford its debt, but American politicians are sacrificing real improvement in living standards tomorrow in order to live high on the hog today. That is a pity.
302![]() |
albusteve Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:22:10am |
re: #296 The Other Les
This is not the highest achievement of Western Civilization but I still like it.
[Link: www.youtube.com...]
darn close tho...
303![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:22:26am |
re: #289 nonic
The person who knocked him over must have noticed.
304![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:22:26am |
re: #297 nonic
The problem is nonic there was security hired for the event but there was no possible way there could have been enough security to stop the stampede that occured the best case scenario here would have been 2 huge mobs meeting in hte middle with a lot more casualties.
305![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:22:49am |
re: #291 rancher
The mob and Walmart still have no bearing on the 8 employees who chose to try and pit the weight of 8 against 2000+ especially since they saw the security doors failing. Once again unless someone from Walmart management ordered them to hold the doors up, Walmart should not be liable for the decision of those 8 to stand up to the mob.
Suppose it was a customer killed. Would that change your analysis?
306![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:23:29am |
re: #289 nonic
It's highly unlikey that anybody but the first one or two even saw the guy on the floor. That's the definition of a mob rushing forward --- they can't see where they're going.
Personal responsibility works both ways, you know. You cannot CREATE a hazardous situation and then blame "the greedy mob" for responding.
These situations happened before, though apparently nobody was killed. That's called "prior notice." Wal-Mart knew what could happen. And they apparently didn't do enough to control and protect.
We could just turn every mall into a free-for-all. Sounds exciting, but I don't know how good it would be for business in general.
You realize it was Black Friday. You can't blame one store for the mob of shoppers for one day, it was going to happen no matter what store you were at.
307![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:23:56am |
re: #298 rancher
It was done from pakistan's part of kishmir with a known paki based terrorist group that has known connections to the ISI now the question is was it a rouge element in the ISI or was it higher up? and if not now the Paki gov't has to destroy the terrorist group and arrest the ISI members. If it doesn't do any of this then they can be held accountable.
308![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:24:27am |
re: #305 nonic
Suppose it was a customer killed. Would that change your analysis?
No, not me. The customers knew what they were getting into on Black Friday.
309![]() |
albusteve Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:24:53am |
310![]() |
wahabicorridor Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:26:33am |
311![]() |
akak Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:28:31am |
re: #307 yochanan
It was done from pakistan's part of kishmir with a known paki based terrorist group that has known connections to the ISI now the question is was it a rouge element in the ISI or was it higher up? and if not now the Paki gov't has to destroy the terrorist group and arrest the ISI members. If it doesn't do any of this then they can be held accountable.
They were trying that (ISI terrorists) months ago, problem is someone will have to do it for them.
312![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:28:40am |
re: #306 Hengineer
You realize it was Black Friday. You can't blame one store for the mob of shoppers for one day, it was going to happen no matter what store you were at.
How about every ordering everyone to get into a line or we don't open the doors?
313![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:29:27am |
314![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:30:11am |
re: #312 shanec99
How about every ordering everyone to get into a line or we don't open the doors?
That can also cause a crowd to get unruly and just tear the doors down anyway, maybe incite a riot. If it does incite a riot would you still blame Wal-Mart?
315![]() |
akak Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:30:36am |
re: #312 shanec99
How about every ordering everyone to get into a line or we don't open the doors?
How about having 1 police officer at the door with a gun?
316![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:32:05am |
re: #297 nonic
"Because there are idiots in the world who feel that being a part of a crowd gives them the right to do anything they want,"
EXACTLY. Plus, there are people swept up by the mob, regardless of their individual intentions. That part is called "the problem." What we're looking for here is called "solution," or prevention.
"Excusing individual behavior as part of crowd mentality is to cheapen individual behavior, either we are free or we are not,"
Lovely philosophical thought, and on that level, I agree with you.
But on a public, PRACTICAL level, I sure as hell don't want my kid going to a rock concert where the venue holds each and every free-soul individual up to his or her own noble self-responsibility and says screw the security, we'll pack the jury with Stonemasons.
That's the problem with people nowadays. Nobody wants to be responsible anymore. Its all about free-will do whatever you want and its somebody else's problem.
317![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:33:02am |
re: #315 akak
How about having 1 police officer at the door with a gun?
The police weren't there at all? I went shopping around 8 or 9 at a Target and Best Buy, and there were cop cars parked in every row of that parking lot.
318![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:34:08am |
re: #312 shanec99
How about every ordering everyone to get into a line or we don't open the doors?
How about NOT inciting a mob with promises of 90% discounts on limited-quantity items, NOT opening for business at 5 am to add drama, and NOT calling the event a "door buster"?
319![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:34:28am |
re: #305 nonic
No they put themselves into the Situation. The 8 month pregnant woman who put herself in the situation and was injured on the outskirts has no sympathy from me. Everyone there made a conscious choice to be there everyone involved is responsible both the deceased the injured and the mob. Unless your trying to say walmart forced the mob to form there, then forced them to force the doors down.
320![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:35:31am |
re: #46 Racer X
If I was the manager of that store I would have hit the fire alarm and sent everyone out empty handed.
Yea, if the fire alarm went off they wouldn't just grab shit off the shelves and walk out.
321![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:36:21am |
re: #312 shanec99
The doors weren't open at the time there was so much pressure on em from the mob the security glass shattered and the mob swarmed thru there were bowing the entranceway doors when the 8 decided to hold the line against 2000 me thinks someone saw the movie 300 and said hell if 300 spartans can hold 1 mill plus persians us 8 can stop 2000.
322![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:36:46am |
re: #55 BlueCanuck
Stuff like this has been going on for decades at least. Remember the mania surrounding the Cabbage Patch dolls? Something could have been done better, and next year probably will be. I think though that it should require educating the masses, or prohibiting late night line ups/camp outs on the dawn of a big sale or new highly anticipated product release.
Tickle me Elmo dolls
323![]() |
Hengineer Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:37:32am |
re: #321 rancher
The doors weren't open at the time there was so much pressure on em from the mob the security glass shattered and the mob swarmed thru there were bowing the entranceway doors when the 8 decided to hold the line against 2000 me thinks someone saw the movie 300 and said hell if 300 spartans can hold 1 mill plus persians us 8 can stop 2000.
Can Wal-Mart hold the people liable for broken doors and glass?
324![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:37:45am |
re: #317 Hengineer
There were police there trying to establish order about an hour before opening but at 0500 when they were due to open people who removed themselves from the rush were cited as saying no PD at location when hte incident occured.
325![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:38:14am |
re: #314 Hengineer
"If it does incite a riot would you still blame Wal-Mart?"
Incitement. :-)
If it's a loony, bloodthirsty, barbarian "religious leader" exhorting his listeners to kill "infidels," incitement is bad.
If it's a store offering electronics at big discounts and whipping up mob behavior as a publicity stunt in the process, it's okay.
Just want to get that straight.
326![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:38:50am |
re: #323 Hengineer
If they could ID positively anyone they may be able to but the anonimity of the mob will likely prevent it from happening.
327![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:40:30am |
re: #316 Hengineer
"That's the problem with people nowadays. Nobody wants to be responsible anymore. Its all about free-will do whatever you want and its somebody else's problem."
I'm just looking for the store to be responsible, too.
328![]() |
fiat_lux Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:41:42am |
re: #294 yochanan
I have already been informed by Little Old lady and Killian that my heretical views are not welcome. I have also posted that I will not bring this subject up again. I understand that those words that I wrote can profit you nothing. I apologize to all whom I may have offended.I hope I may be forgiven.
329![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:42:28am |
I went to one single Black Friday sale in my adult life went to the walmart futhest from town which had about 1/4 the crowds of other places and still decided after that year that the costs associated with attending Black Friday sales was greater than the savings I was getting buying at that time hence I've stopped going. There is nothing stopping other from coming to hte same conclusion.
330![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:46:05am |
re: #319 rancher
"Unless your trying to say walmart forced the mob to form there, then forced them to force the doors down."
You don't need to "force" someone to get hurt on your property to be held responsible for hazards you create.
331![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:50:45am |
re: #330 nonic
So is the initial shooter responsible when a shooting occurs and instead of doing the smart thing and making themselves scarse, the people instead all crowd around to see whats happening and trample others. No! Everyone made a decision to go there, they ignored law enforcement trying to establish order, they made the desicion that walmart wasn't opening fast enough, they then decided that even after announcements were made about someone down and injured please stop so we can get him out. The mob is utterly responsible for his death not Walmart.
332![]() |
albusteve Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:51:26am |
re: #330 nonic
"Unless your trying to say walmart forced the mob to form there, then forced them to force the doors down."
You don't need to "force" someone to get hurt on your property to be held responsible for hazards you create.
may the force not be with you...if it were my walmart I'd hunt down the thugs that smashed in my doors...then prosecute those that assulted my employees...maybe not practical but I have my principals..."come early for a great deal" is no excuse imo
333![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:52:28am |
Well the mob and the individual are responsible for his death he also made a choice to be there. Police are now trying to determine the people involved in the actual trampling to file charges.
334![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:53:36am |
re: #310 wahabicorridor
Ontario College of Art and Design. Yeah, it's a brick on stilts isn't it?
335![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:54:21am |
It's the whole blaming of society, or Walmart, or Target, or what ever other entity, instead of the people involved in the mob that allows people to continue with the mob mentality.
336![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:54:32am |
re: #331 rancher
So is the initial shooter responsible when a shooting occurs and instead of doing the smart thing and making themselves scarse, the people instead all crowd around to see whats happening and trample others. No! Everyone made a decision to go there, they ignored law enforcement trying to establish order, they made the desicion that walmart wasn't opening fast enough, they then decided that even after announcements were made about someone down and injured please stop so we can get him out. The mob is utterly responsible for his death not Walmart.
Uh-huh. Does Wal-Mart have any responsibility for protecting its employees from out-of-control mobs?
Or do the employees choose to work there, so it's their fault if they get killed?
337![]() |
Unboldened Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:55:20am |
re: #214 rancher
Ya, I know. It takes almost nothing for something to disappear if you choose a good sandy spot with decent wind. I expect someday, maybe 10 or 20 years from now, a story will popup about a small town getting sick and they'll eventually track it down to a few hundred gallons of leaky whatever.
338![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:55:41am |
Said employee had no business pitting himself against the mob tho that was his choice. Walmart had security for the sale police had previously tryed establishing order. What don't you understand about that.
339![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:56:04am |
re: #328 fiat_lux
Just say it for the I.D. threads. A third viewpoint would definitely throw a wrench into theworks. Heck, sometimes I think about calling myself a pastafarian, just for grins and giggles.
340![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 4:56:52am |
Yeah I.D threads are fun I never am around for anything butthe opens tho.
343![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:02:01am |
re: #325 nonic
It is still up to the individual actors to go an kill the infidel. This premise is destroyed by the fact that everyone in the audience is not a blodthirsty terrorist. Much the same as everyone in the audience is not a black friday shopper.
There are individual decisions made at every level, and the individual needs to be held accountable more often. The shame of this is, like you also said, it is a nice thought in theory, it isn't happening in reality.
We need to change that but we have an uphill battle, considering we have just proven, through an election, that even our President is not accountable for his actions or his words.
345![]() |
wahabicorridor Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:02:46am |
re: #334 BlueCanuck
Ontario College of Art and Design. Yeah, it's a brick on stilts isn't it?
Gah! Art and Design? I hope they lost their accredidation.
346![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:03:50am |
At least it wasn't the Frank Lloyd Wright school of Architectual Design that was a brick on stilts.
347![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:04:41am |
re: #335 rancher
It's the whole blaming of society, or Walmart, or Target, or what ever other entity, instead of the people involved in the mob that allows people to continue with the mob mentality.
Exact opposite.
Holding the store responsible for control and protection when the store creates a hazard means the store will limit and/or control the mob it creates.
Not holding the store responsible means nobody controls the mob. And the store feels free to go on creating greater and greater hazards.
348![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:06:17am |
today is the 50th anv. of the 'Our Lady of Angels' fire in which 92 kids and 3 nuns died.
back in the 70's i had a girl friend who wrote a book about this
The Fire That Will Not Die, by Michele McBride
it appears it might have been arson but we will never know.
349![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:09:09am |
re: #345 wahabicorridor
You wouldn't believe some of the reviews it got. It either got praised, or slammed. Whenever I walk by it I get a litttle nervous. :)
/scared of strong winds kind of nervous.
350![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:09:34am |
re: #328 fiat_lux
fiat i am not offened i am more like bored by the subject
one of the reasons i don't debate religion it is a subject you can't win on.
plus there is the history of jews being forced to debate relgion back in europe. here i am free to say i will not do it and no one can force me to do just that. but in europe they could force it.
351![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:10:44am |
re: #347 nonic
Walmart typically advertises less with its Black Friday sales. People just flock there because for many Walmart is there bread and butter store. Walmart took appropriate percautions police were called an hour prior to opening when it looked like it might be out of hand however the police left prior to the store opening if anything the PD is more culpable than Walmart.
352![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:12:49am |
i would not get in a shopping mob for anything wal-mart or any other store sells. In fact anytime i am in a crowd of any size i keep an eye out on how to get out of said crowd if i have to. applies to sporting events, movies etc.
353![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:13:12am |
re: #336 nonic
Uh-huh. Does Wal-Mart have any responsibility for protecting its employees from out-of-control mobs?
Or do the employees choose to work there, so it's their fault if they get killed?
you are setting up the wrong argument, the employee is not at fault, nor is Wal-mart. For you argument to hold water, that is, wal-mart is at fault due to stirring up the crowd, there would have had to have been deaths at a majority of the wal-marts. The advertising was nation wide, there was only one death. This death is the responsibility of the individuals who began the push, the responsibility of the individuals that did not stop the push, and the responsibility of those that simply went along to get along.
You brought the insanity of terroists into this as a really bad analogy, so I am going to use it. It has been widely advertised that if we print some stupid cartoons rioting will ensue, people may die...therefore, any outlet that prints those silly cartoons is responisble for any deaths that occur.
Wal-mart advertised a sale, as did EVERY other retailer in the nation.
354![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:13:24am |
re: #343 stonemason
"There are individual decisions made at every level, and the individual needs to be held accountable more often. The shame of this is, like you also said, it is a nice thought in theory, it isn't happening in reality."
Right.
In an ideal world, everything would be perfect. Everybody would be responsible for his own actions. No one would ever make bad choices.
Somewhere over the rainbow.
But in the meantime we live in an imperfect world. And we have laws and judicial precedents to try to keep order. And insurance companies that impose their often over-cautious rules, too.
And in that world -- the imperfect one -- entities that create hazards that threaten mayhem and death bear responsibility.
I'm done.
356![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:16:19am |
re: #347 nonic
Holding the store responsible for control and protection when the store creates a hazard means the store will limit and/or control the mob it creates.
So the store is no longer allowed to advertise? Or must the store hire an equal amount of security to the 'mob' expected? How about when this happens after Detroit wins a Basketball title, should the Pistons no longer play?
Seriously, where is the line? when does the individual lose responsiblity?
357![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:18:47am |
re: #356 stonemason
Seriously, where is the line? when does the individual lose responsiblity?
Apparently when he's part of a mob attending a sale.
358![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:19:10am |
after the fact judgements
for example the 'OUR LADY OF ANGELS' fire the school met the existing fire and building codes but it was one of the main reasons chicago's fire and building codes were changed to require sprinkler systems and more fire exits. So if the school were to befound today they could be liable but not at the time of the fire.
the school had a arson attempt a few months earlier and there was a report that this fire may have been arson as well as some burnt matches were found and a boy confessed and later recanted said confession and since he is no longer alive there is no one to question at this late date.
359![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:19:51am |
Ruslter signing out cause Rancher is up and wants on footballs I'm back to lurking so he can post.
/dragon smoke
360![]() |
wahabicorridor Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:20:28am |
re: #349 BlueCanuck
You wouldn't believe some of the reviews it got. It either got praised, or slammed. Whenever I walk by it I get a litttle nervous. :)
/scared of strong winds kind of nervous.
I get a kick out of the reviews for Frank Gehry's stuff. What a fraud. One of his more recent buildings (at a university somewhere - about 2 years old) is already falling apart and he's being sued.
361![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:21:54am |
re: #360 wahabicorridor
Bah yeah I Meant Gehry no clue why i said Frank Lloyd Wright.
362![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:23:17am |
Frank Lloyd Wright is a diff Architect from an older time from late 1800's early 1900's.
Rustler 1 last time.
363![]() |
yochanan Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:28:39am |
Wright building are very expansive to keep up and repair and many had design flaws from the very beginning
364![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:29:36am |
Regarding Wal-Mart: here is my question: Has a retailer ever been found guuilty in the death or the injury of a customer or employee where the retailer recognized that it needed more security but failed to provide it?
If that precident has been set, then Walmart may have a problem, it may be found at least partially liable if this went to a jury.
Just imagine a lawyer asking the questions:
Was the security adequate?
Was there any security there at all?
If adequate security were there, would the employee have lost his life?
What conclusion do you think a jury will come to, especially if there is a precident?
365![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:30:45am |
Rancher decided to eat instead of post so I'm Baaaack. Yeah Wright buildings had upkeep problems but Gehry had the funky designs which is what I was commenting on regarding the brick on stilts school of art from Canada.
366![]() |
Unboldened Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:33:11am |
re: #354 nonic
re: #358 yochanan
I think existing codes and regulations is what it's going to come down to. Obviously not practical to hold a mob responsible even if they are somewhat. And I don't think it's very likely that WalMart was deliberately/knowingly in violation of any significant safety codes.
I think this will end up one of those live and learn things, with regulations in the future, and maybe a small settlement from WalMart in order to keep their good image.
367![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:35:53am |
re: #364 shanec99
What conclusion do you think a jury will come to, especially if there is a precident?
But the jury pool will be made up of people who also lack the personal responsibilty. We have been indoctrinated to believe that we are all innocents, that is our schooling, that is what we see every day. Perhaps, just perhaps, there is something to be said for that 'we are all sinners' mantra that some religions espouse. At least that way, personal choices would be taken into account when juries look at these things.
368![]() |
wahabicorridor Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:36:35am |
re: #363 yochanan
Wright building are very expansive to keep up and repair and many had design flaws from the very beginning
I've never been much on FL Wright. Altho' I do give him credit for the way he sited his houses (e.g. Falling Waters), I find that given the materials he used the places were 'cold and hard'. Not comfortable AT ALL
369![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:37:06am |
re: #366 Unboldened
Walmart might not be found criminally liable, but there is a chance the could have a tort action against, involving failure to provide a secure work environment if it can be demonstrated that they did not have sufficient security available.
It might be wise to settle out of court, tort actions can be expensive and costly especially to a corporation like Walmart with deep pockets.
370![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:39:03am |
re: #364 shanec99
Problem is there is no such thing as adequate security for this situation. Adequate security would have been a mass as large as or almost as large as said crowd attempting to push its way in and that would have resulted in a nasty press of bodies in the middle causing far more loss of life. Unless as someone mentioned someone with a gun was posted at the entrance to fire a warning shot to wake up the mob and impose enough fear on them to stop them.
371![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:39:16am |
re: #367 stonemason
But the jury pool will be made up of people who also lack the personal responsibilty. We have been indoctrinated to believe that we are all innocents, that is our schooling, that is what we see every day. Perhaps, just perhaps, there is something to be said for that 'we are all sinners' mantra that some religions espouse. At least that way, personal choices would be taken into account when juries look at these things.
You may wish that were the case, but the reality is that the person with the deep pocket pays if it can be demonstrated that they did not anticipate the probability of loss and do everything to mitigate against it.
372![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:40:03am |
re: #370 rancher
Problem is there is no such thing as adequate security for this situation. Adequate security would have been a mass as large as or almost as large as said crowd attempting to push its way in and that would have resulted in a nasty press of bodies in the middle causing far more loss of life. Unless as someone mentioned someone with a gun was posted at the entrance to fire a warning shot to wake up the mob and impose enough fear on them to stop them.
Go ahead and argue that before a jury and see where it gets you.
373![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:40:43am |
re: #370 rancher
Problem is there is no such thing as adequate security for this situation. Adequate security would have been a mass as large as or almost as large as said crowd attempting to push its way in and that would have resulted in a nasty press of bodies in the middle causing far more loss of life. Unless as someone mentioned someone with a gun was posted at the entrance to fire a warning shot to wake up the mob and impose enough fear on them to stop them.
::Devils Advocate::
The shot would have caused a panic in the other direction, causing more deaths, therefore the cop with the gun would have been responsible for those deaths.
::D.A::
374![]() |
rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:42:16am |
re: #373 stonemason
I agree. Just saying the only way to stop a mob or stampede is to get them more afraid of what ahead than whats behind.
376![]() |
Crux Australis Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:43:11am |
Black Friday in the US reminds me of the Christmas/New Years sales in Australia. A week of madness as all the stores heavily discount their products for sale.
377![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:43:53am |
re: #370 rancher
The problem with that is you have to set up the adequate security BEFORE it becomes a problem. Five, maybe 3 guards doing proper crowd control, directing people, assisting with other tasks can do wonders. But it has to be set up before the crowds arrive. If you set up clearly delineated lines you wouldn't have that huge rush. But then I am a Canadian. We are willing to wait in lines patiently. :)
378![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:45:32am |
re: #373 stonemason
I think Walmart would be best served by looking after its employee's family and settling out of court.
This was loss of life on the job, and a lawyer may be able to convince a jury that the corporation was trying to cut costs and did not appropriately anticipate the risk to its employees and failed to provide adequate security.
Its that simple.
379![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:45:48am |
re: #371 shanec99
I understand the twisted legal arguments, and I could ver easily argue the other side of this, that is the freakin' problem.
I chose to smoke cigarettes, I read the warnings and ignored them, it was my choice. But, if federal government hadn't settled with the Tobacco industy, I could sue.
I tossed 12 inch branches into the chipper all day, they came out the other side in pieces. The chipper ate my arm, gee, I didn't think it would do that, who can I sue?
The pop tart burned my kitchen when it caught fire in the toaster...
I am not arguing that Wal-mart isn't going to be sued for this, I am not arguing that Wal-mart is going to lose, I am arguing that it is WRONG.
You mentioned the 'deep pockets'...is that what makes them liable? Or is it just a persausive lawyer and a jury ready to stick it to the 'man'?
380![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:49:01am |
re: #377 BlueCanuck
The problem with that is you have to set up the adequate security BEFORE it becomes a problem. Five, maybe 3 guards doing proper crowd control, directing people, assisting with other tasks can do wonders. But it has to be set up before the crowds arrive. If you set up clearly delineated lines you wouldn't have that huge rush. But then I am a Canadian. We are willing to wait in lines patiently. :)
Absolutely, and the jury will be told that Walmart mgt. knew that the crowds would be large, and that all large crowds carry the potential for a stampede.
Yet despite this knowledge it did nothing to provide adequate crowd control.
A good tort lawyer or law firm will eat them alive infront of a jury, and with Walmart's deep pockets... God help them.
382![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:50:09am |
re: #378 shanec99
I agree that Wal-mar tshould handle this in a good way, that they should take care of the family and all, but that is not because Wal-mart is at fault, that is just what a good company should do. However:
appropriately anticipate the risk
That is the lawyerese that makes it impossible for Wal-mart to do the right thing. By helping the family, a good lawyer, or even a non-lawyer such as myself, could argue that Wal-mart has admitted culpabiltiy by helping the family.
Many people blame the lawyers, that is another situation of blaming the 'other'. If we could remember personal responsibility we would have no trouble placing blame where it belongs.
384![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:52:33am |
re: #380 shanec99
Absolutely, and the jury will be told that Walmart mgt. knew that the crowds would be large, and that all large crowds carry the potential for a stampede.
Yet despite this knowledge it did nothing to provide adequate crowd control.
A good tort lawyer or law firm will eat them alive infront of a jury, and with Walmart's deep pockets... God help them.
Just for arguments sake, couldn't wal-marts lawyers point to the thousands of stores that had the same exact mobs and no one died? I think there is a bigger precedent for non-deaths at these insane events.
386![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:55:28am |
re: #382 stonemason
In my mind the greatest part of the blame lies with the unruly crowd.
Having said that, in the court room when there is a loss you go after the person or entity with the deepest pocket if even the slightest bit of blame came be placed at their doorstep.
That is the reality.
Now ask yourself this: Can a lawyer convince a jury that security that day was inadequate in light of the expected crowds, and the potential for crowds to stampede?
You know the answer.
387![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:57:07am |
re: #384 stonemason
Just for arguments sake, couldn't wal-marts lawyers point to the thousands of stores that had the same exact mobs and no one died? I think there is a bigger precedent for non-deaths at these insane events.
Yes they can... tell them to try that line in front of a jury where a bread winner has lost his life doing your work in your place of employment.
You can try it, you might not like the outcome.
388![]() |
L_Y_N_X29 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:57:21am |
Did you know? It was jews killing jews and israeli false flag all along in mumbai according to pakistan.
Pakistan has never been and never will be our friend or ally
390![]() |
realwest Sun, Nov 30, 2008 5:59:31am |
Well good morning y'all - from a coolish (37 degrees going up to 45 degrees) and rainy Charlotte!
How is everyone doing this morning?
391![]() |
Unboldened Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:00:23am |
re: #367 stonemason
But the jury pool will be made up of people who also lack the personal responsibilty. We have been indoctrinated to believe that we are all innocents, that is our schooling, that is what we see every day. Perhaps, just perhaps, there is something to be said for that 'we are all sinners' mantra that some religions espouse. At least that way, personal choices would be taken into account when juries look at these things.
People like you do end up on juries. I sat on a DUI case where we ended up sending the poor guy down the river. From drama in the court and the amount that the defense did their best to come up with someway to mitigate responsibility, I'm guessing that the verdict cost him his job and probably his wife and kids. We still called him guilty.
Anyone know if a legal battle would be in NY, or could they somehow move it to San Francisco?
392![]() |
Rancher Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:01:30am |
What I think I'm seeing here is that if I'm a huge store and want to have a sale on Black Friday I have to hire thousands of unarmed security guards in case of a mob situation or just stay closed on the biggest shopping day of the year? Has anyone found out why the police abandoned the store and left these employees in harms way?
Real Rancher
393![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:01:45am |
re: #386 shanec99
Yes...I know the answer, I know that Wal-mart is going to pay. I just know it is wrong. This attitude gives us higher insurance premiums, because of course Wal-mart isn't going to pay, an insurance company is, and it sullies the reputations of lawyers even more. Perhaps there will be a judge that is not "...dependent on His will alone...", meaning not beholden to any interest group for any reason, and will toss this out.
I am not debating what is going to happen, I am debating right and wrong. Wal-mart is not in the wrong. There were 2, 3, maybe 4 people who started the crush, then, 15 to 20 that egged them on, then the rest realized exactly what is being pushed, Wal-mart has deep pockets, I am part of a mob, I am not responsible, and the next thing you know, some one is dead.
We need to try as hard as we can to pull back from that, but I am afraid we are moving closer to the insanity.
394![]() |
MandyManners Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:02:40am |
re: #388 L_Y_N_X29
Did you know? It was jews killing jews and israeli false flag all along in mumbai according to pakistan.
Pakistan has never been and never will be our friend or ally
Is the Pakistan Daily a government organ?
395![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:03:06am |
re: #387 shanec99
Yes they can... tell them to try that line in front of a jury where a bread winner has lost his life doing your work in your place of employment.
You can try it, you might not like the outcome.
Right...exactly...facts are not what the decison will be based upon, it will be all emotion. So where is the Justice in that?
/just curious, not antagonistic
396![]() |
MandyManners Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:03:17am |
re: #392 Rancher
What I think I'm seeing here is that if I'm a huge store and want to have a sale on Black Friday I have to hire thousands of unarmed security guards in case of a mob situation or just stay closed on the biggest shopping day of the year? Has anyone found out why the police abandoned the store and left these employees in harms way?
Real Rancher
Over stating the case. You wouldn't need thousands of guards.
397![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:03:27am |
re: #388 L_Y_N_X29
Did you know? It was jews killing jews and israeli false flag all along in mumbai according to pakistan.
Pakistan has never been and never will be our friend or ally
Good grief... when will the treachery from the apologists for Islamic murderers end?
398![]() |
legalpad Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:04:11am |
re: #390 realwest
Morning - 45 degrees to a high of 67 in Austin, Texas -
399![]() |
realwest Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:05:02am |
re: #391 Unboldened
Good morning to you. I suspect VERY STRONGLY, that the CCTV cameras in the store caught all of the "action" on tape. Whether or not they can identify some of the miscreants (I'm tempeted to use the words murderers here) is something I don't know. But I think that if they can be identified and had ANYTHING to do with breaking down the doors, knocking over that poor guy, trampling on him or just running right past with him on the floor in plain sight, then the cops SHOULD PROSECUTE those people. It will be a NY criminal case and if there are any civil suits they too will be in NY.
400![]() |
doriangrey Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:05:21am |
re: #390 realwest
Well good morning y'all - from a coolish (37 degrees going up to 45 degrees) and rainy Charlotte!
How is everyone doing this morning?
Good morning real, I'm doing fine, how about yourself?
401![]() |
MandyManners Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:05:33am |
re: #393 stonemason
Yes...I know the answer, I know that Wal-mart is going to pay. I just know it is wrong. This attitude gives us higher insurance premiums, because of course Wal-mart isn't going to pay, an insurance company is, and it sullies the reputations of lawyers even more. Perhaps there will be a judge that is not "...dependent on His will alone...", meaning not beholden to any interest group for any reason, and will toss this out.
I am not debating what is going to happen, I am debating right and wrong. Wal-mart is not in the wrong. There were 2, 3, maybe 4 people who started the crush, then, 15 to 20 that egged them on, then the rest realized exactly what is being pushed, Wal-mart has deep pockets, I am part of a mob, I am not responsible, and the next thing you know, some one is dead.
We need to try as hard as we can to pull back from that, but I am afraid we are moving closer to the insanity.
If this is tried in federal court, won't the judge be immune to outside influence?
402![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:06:48am |
re: #395 stonemason
Right...exactly...facts are not what the decison will be based upon, it will be all emotion. So where is the Justice in that?
/just curious, not antagonistic
I am dealing in what is reality. Facts, emotions everything... they all get rolled into a tort case, and more often than not the person who is hurt gets paid by the person with the deepest pockets.
403![]() |
Sunlight Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:07:09am |
It was VA Tech. Except instead of students backing down, it was uniformed police.
Mumbai photographer: I wish I'd had a gun, not a camera. Armed police would not fire back
404![]() |
notutopia Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:07:45am |
re: #21 Karridine
The Physician Constitutional Amendment...
405![]() |
stonemason Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:08:23am |
re: #401 MandyManners
If this is tried in federal court, won't the judge be immune to outside influence?
LOL...I think you forgot the sarc tag on that one. How many times do we discuss the makeup of the Supreme Court and the effect President Elect Obama's choices will have?
How about the Ninth Circuit in California...they are federal, and they are not 'bound by law', they are bound by ideology.
406![]() |
realwest Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:08:25am |
Oh and btw, y'all - put this in the spinoff links but it's too good to leave there: MSNBC's Chris ("I feel a tingle up my leg")Matthews is considering running for Arlen Specter's Senate seat in 2010!
Oh, joy. A US Senate with both Al Franken and Chirssy Matthews a members.
How lucky can we get?!
407![]() |
MandyManners Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:09:56am |
re: #405 stonemason
LOL...I think you forgot the sarc tag on that one. How many times do we discuss the makeup of the Supreme Court and the effect President Elect Obama's choices will have?
How about the Ninth Circuit in California...they are federal, and they are not 'bound by law', they are bound by ideology.
They are bound by precedent and statutory law. If what they do doesn't jibe with those, the USSC can reverse them.
408![]() |
BlueCanuck Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:10:00am |
Morning realwest. Looks like you have our weather down there today. Or at least just a few degrees in difference.
409![]() |
realwest Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:10:14am |
re: #400 doriangrey
Hey dorian, I'm doing ok, thanks. Rain is really kinda cold down here, and it's been raining virtually without let-up since about 3:00PM yesterday, and I'm ready for Spring!
How are you getting along?
410![]() |
nonic Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:10:16am |
New York Times: Wal-Mart Employee Trampled to Death [Link: www.nytimes.com...]
By 4:55, with no police officers in sight, the crowd of more than 2,000 had become a rabble, and could be held back no longer. Fists banged and shoulders pressed on the sliding-glass double doors, which bowed in with the weight of the assault. Six to 10 workers inside tried to push back, but it was hopeless.
Suddenly, witnesses and the police said, the doors shattered, and the shrieking mob surged through in a blind rush for holiday bargains. One worker, Jdimytai Damour, 34, was thrown back onto the black linoleum tiles and trampled in the stampede that streamed over and around him. Others who had stood alongside Mr. Damour trying to hold the doors were also hurled back and run over, witnesses said.
* * *
Detective Lt. Michael Fleming, who is in charge of the investigation for the Nassau police, said the store lacked adequate security. He called the scene “utter chaos” and said the “crowd was out of control.” As for those who had run over the victim, criminal charges were possible, the lieutenant said. “I’ve heard other people call this an accident, but it is not,” he said. “Certainly it was a foreseeable act.”
* * *
Wal-Mart has successfully resisted unionization of its employees. New York State’s largest grocery union, Local 1500 of the United Food and Commercial Workers, called the death of Mr. Damour “avoidable” and demanded investigations.
“Where were the safety barriers?” said Bruce Both, the union president. “Where was security? How did store management not see dangerous numbers of customers barreling down on the store in such an unsafe manner? This is not just tragic; it rises to a level of blatant irresponsibility by Wal-Mart.”
* * *
411![]() |
notutopia Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:10:24am |
Good Morning Lizards.
COFFEE and Chicory anyone?
: )
412![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:10:26am |
re: #399 realwest
Yes, I agree with you... they should be proscecuted, but criminal proscecution is not the same as tort action.
The standards of evidence are different.
You may be found criminally not guilty, but found responsible in a tort case. Ever heard about OJ Simpson?
What do you think happened?
413![]() |
Thanos Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:10:28am |
re: #388 L_Y_N_X29
That's a non mainstream paper belonging to a politically motivated agit prop group. It's done by internationalists and it's not the voice of Pakistan. The group writing it wants tighter business ties to China if that gives you a hint.
Going there for Pakistan views is like going to Prison Planet for US Political news. Did you note the byline? N. Kapner is not a Pakistani name.
414![]() |
legalpad Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:10:31am |
re: #403 Sunlight
WTF? Who are these jerks who call themselves policemen?
415![]() |
Unboldened Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:11:35am |
re: #397 shanec99
Good grief... when will the treachery from the
apologistspropagandists for Islamic murderers end?
Quick fix.. sorry. That news clip is so soo sooooo...
Sigh... just makes me wanna throw up.
416![]() |
shanec99 Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:11:44am |
re: #405 stonemason
LOL...I think you forgot the sarc tag on that one. How many times do we discuss the makeup of the Supreme Court and the effect President Elect Obama's choices will have?
How about the Ninth Circuit in California...they are federal, and they are not 'bound by law', they are bound by ideology.
Federal court for a tort action... come on, stop it.
417![]() |
realwest Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:12:57am |
re: #398 legalpad Well hell, y'all ain't much better off than we are!
I don't get it at all - we've had nothing but some 3 or more straight weeks of cold weather and it isn't even officially winter yet!
I blame Al Gore.
418![]() |
doriangrey Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:13:09am |
re: #409 realwest
Hey dorian, I'm doing ok, thanks. Rain is really kinda cold down here, and it's been raining virtually without let-up since about 3:00PM yesterday, and I'm ready for Spring!
How are you getting along?
Well, by god at least it isnt snowing.... ;) Things are going pretty well here in my neck of the woods.
419![]() |
sbvft contributor Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:14:32am |
I'm sure the left-wing-kook-Kos-Krazies-Obama-Cultist blogs are on fire with their condemnations of the Mumbai savagery. Let's put on the old Tyvek Suit and wander over to the open sewer that is the Daily "S***w Them" Kos and see what the Obamatots are talking about, shall we?......Hmmmmm - GEE, BIG SURPRISE HERE - NOTHING ON THE FRONT PAGE OF COURSE.....Well, maybe some of the loons have expressed some outrage on their so-called "diaries"? Titles include: Good luck finding someone to piss in your cup///Certainty, Part II (Or teacherken/GrannyDoc/eugene IV) - Embracing uncertainty ////"Fish technology" device could power the world ///The Diary I've Always Wanted to Write ///Good Mood Foods: You Know You Want To Read This ///My christmas wish list ////People for the Ethical Treatment of Autistics (LOL - THOSE ARE ACTUAL TITLES EVERYONE - I'M NOT MAKING THIS UP)
420![]() |
legalpad Sun, Nov 30, 2008 6:15:00am |
