LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

  

Link address:
Link title:
Description:
Remaining:

Media Excuses for Atrocity

Media | Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:24:28 am PST

Tom Gross asks the question: If This Isn’t Terrorism, What Is?

So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists? Why did Jon Snow, one of Britain’s most respected TV journalists, use the word “practitioners” when referring to the Mumbai terrorists? Was he perhaps confusing them with doctors?

Why did Britain’s highly regarded Channel 4 News state that the “militants” showed a “wanton disregard for race or creed” when exactly the opposite was true: Targets and victims were very carefully selected. Why did the “experts” invited to discuss the Mumbai attacks in one show on the state-funded Radio France Internationale, the voice of France around the world, harp on about Baruch Goldstein (who carried out the Hebron shootings in 1994), virtually the sole case of a Jewish terrorist in living memory?

Unfortunately in recent years we have become used to leftist media burying their heads in the sand about the threat that Islamic fundamentalism poses, in much the same way as they once refused to report accurately on communist atrocities. But now even conservative media may be doing it too.

316 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Shug  12/02/08 9:24:58 am reply quote
So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists?

Fear

2 Nevergiveup  12/02/08 9:25:29 am reply quote

If you can't name the enemy, it really gets hard to defeat them.

3 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:26:11 am reply quote

Charles, you are so insensitive...
(yes: /////)

4 pat  12/02/08 9:26:42 am reply quote

Hell, the NYT does not even acknowledge the terrorists were Muslims.

5 rabidsquirrel  12/02/08 9:27:14 am reply quote

re: #1 Shug

Fear

With an unhealthy side order of suicidal multiculturalism.

6 Jetpilot1101  12/02/08 9:27:17 am reply quote

Answer: Because then our new president and the rest of the peace loving hippie freak leaders out there would actually have to grow a pair, tell the radical muslims where they can go, get their hands dirty and kick some jihadi ass back to the stone age.

7 Ward Cleaver  12/02/08 9:27:19 am reply quote

re: #1 Shug

Fear

Exactly. They're spineless, and are terrified of speaking up. Instead, they'll let Western Civilization go down the toilet.

8 unreconstructed rebel  12/02/08 9:27:49 am reply quote

I hate watching history reruns.

9 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:28:09 am reply quote
Meanwhile -- perhaps even more disgracefully -- a New York Times report on the last day of the siege stated: "It is not known if the Jewish center was strategically chosen, or if it was an accidental hostage scene."

Yes, and those accidental hostages were later accidentally tortured and shot. Could happen to anyone, really.

/

10 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:28:36 am reply quote

It'll be interesting to see how the Indian press terms this. My guess is that the "T" word will be all over their media and the western press will have some real problems with that. We in the west have very short memories.

11 Ford_Prefect  12/02/08 9:28:37 am reply quote

You can't call them terrorists. That would be mean and then they wouldn't like us.

/...is the sarc tag really necessary?

12 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:28:42 am reply quote

re: #9 Occasional Reader

Yes, and those accidental hostages were later accidentally tortured and shot. Could happen to anyone, really.

/

And, the terrorists STAYED there before to scope it out.

13 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:28:48 am reply quote
But now even conservative media may be doing it too.

Is there such a thing?

14 Jetpilot1101  12/02/08 9:29:03 am reply quote

re: #9 Occasional Reader

Yes, and those accidental hostages were later accidentally tortured and shot. Could happen to anyone, really.

/

Would he be singing the same tune if I accidentally kicked him in the groin with my size 11 steel toed boots?

15 MrSilverDragon  12/02/08 9:29:09 am reply quote

Just another way that the media can dumb down the masses. Kinda like schools nowadays.

16 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:29:14 am reply quote

re: #6 Jetpilot1101

Answer: Because then our new president and the rest of the peace loving hippie freak leaders out there would actually have to grow a pair, tell the radical muslims where they can go, get their hands dirty and kick some jihadi ass back to the stone age.


You silver-tongued devil, you!

17 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:29:28 am reply quote

re: #10 Golem Akbar

It'll be interesting to see how the Indian press terms this. My guess is that the "T" word will be all over their media and the western press will have some real problems with that. We in the west have very short memories.

No. It's the MFM that have short memories, and their short memories are deliberately so.

18 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:30:15 am reply quote

re: #17 MandyManners

No. It's the MFM that have short memories, and their short memories are deliberately so.

MFM? whodat?

19 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:30:15 am reply quote

re: #17 MandyManners

I take it the last M is "media", but is the MF before it what I think it is?

20 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:30:17 am reply quote

re: #15 MrSilverDragon

Just another way that the media can dumb down the masses. Kinda like schools nowadays.

GALLOPING GRAMSCIAN WHORES OF THE CALIPHATE!

21 lawhawk  12/02/08 9:30:23 am reply quote

The media chooses its words carefully. They have meanings. And by avoiding the use of the word terrorism (or Islamic terrorists as is all too often the case), the identities of those involved to say nothing of the ideological reason behind the attacks gets obscured.

Islamic terrorists were behind the Mumbai attacks. They killed in the name of Islam and sought to sow terror in the hears of Mumbai residents. They intended to kill thousands, but while the toll is still too many to bear, they killed around 200. They purposefully sought out to kill Jews, Americans, and Brits, but didn't mind murdering anyone who stood in their way.

It's what they do.

22 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:30:42 am reply quote

re: #18 Golem Akbar

MFM? whodat?

Sharmuta is onto it in No. 19.

23 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:30:48 am reply quote

re: #14 Jetpilot1101

Would he be singing the same tune if I accidentally kicked him in the groin with my size 11 steel toed boots?

We don't know if you deliberately targeted his groin, or if it was just an accident.

24 maddogg  12/02/08 9:30:57 am reply quote

Gonna be an interesting 4 years, if not pleasant or prosperous.

25 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:31:07 am reply quote

It's out of fear. Fear that their journalist would be targeted, fear that they would loose their sources, fear that they would have to revise everything they have been saying for years if they suddenly had to recognize publicly what is really happening.

They have "reported" themselves into a corner, and they have no way out.

26 Ford_Prefect  12/02/08 9:31:22 am reply quote

re: #20 MandyManners

GALLOPING GRAMSCIAN WHORES OF THE CALIPHATE!

I don't know what that means, but it sounds really good so...upding!

27 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:31:24 am reply quote

re: #22 MandyManners

Lady- you crack me up.

28 karmic_inquisitor  12/02/08 9:31:37 am reply quote

The reason you don't call it terrorism is such a label would require the new leader of the free world to address the problem.

Obama is the golden child - to be both revered and protected.

The "free" world has gone on holiday.

29 Shug  12/02/08 9:31:40 am reply quote

CAIR would like to take this opportunity to warn all of you random victims of stray bullets and stray shrapnel not to commit any sort of retaliation

and they condemn all acts of violence directed at non Jews everywhere

30 Jetpilot1101  12/02/08 9:31:42 am reply quote

re: #24 maddogg

Gonna be an interesting 4 years, if not pleasant or prosperous.

That old Chinese proverb is coming back to haunt us: "may you live in interesting times"

31 Opinionated  12/02/08 9:32:24 am reply quote

Caroline Glick on the same topic

The jihadists in Mumbai, like their counterparts from Gaza to Baghdad to Guantanamo Bay, have been defended, and their acts and motivations have been explained away, by their allies and loyal apologists: Western multiculturalists. Multiculturalism is a quasi-religion predicated on both moral relativism and a basic belief in the inherent avarice of the West - particularly of the US and Israel. Multiculturalists assert that Westerners - or, in the case of India, Hindus - are to blame for all acts of violence carried out against them by non-Westerners. IN THE case of the Mumbai massacres, the jihadists' multicultural defenders began justifying their actions while they were still in the midst of their torture and murder spree. In Newsweek, Fareed Zakaria hinted that Indian Hindus had it coming.

....


Once the jig was up on their attempts to hide the identities of the perpetrators and their victims alike, the jihadists' multicultural enablers started blaming the victims. For instance, on Sunday, The Los Angeles Times published an op-ed by University of Chicago law professor Martha Nussbaum attacking Indian Hindus. After blithely dismissing the atrocities that were still under way while she wrote as "probably funded from outside India, in connection with the ongoing conflict over Kashmir," Nussbaum focused her ire against India's Hindus. Recalling the gruesome and apparently state-sanctioned violence against Muslims in India's Gujarat state in 2002, Nussbaum cast the jihadists as nothing more than victims of a Hindu terror state which has been victimizing Muslims for no reason since the 1930s.

[Link: www.jpost.com...]

32 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:32:33 am reply quote

re: #24 maddogg

Gonna be an interesting 4 years, if not pleasant or prosperous.


I fear you are right.

33 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:32:59 am reply quote

re: #1 Shug

Fear

Actually, I think there's more to it than that. Certainly fear, combined with civilizational self-loathing, combined with a weird "professional ethic" of refusing to "judge". That latter point of course only applies to those who are exotic and "other", not to the likes of evil American conservatives.

34 shanec99  12/02/08 9:33:29 am reply quote

Why call them terrorists?
That is too incomplete a definition.
Call them blood thirsty, murdererous, woman beating and pedophiles who pretend to be religous people.

35 TaeJohnDo  12/02/08 9:33:56 am reply quote

Dennis Miller said some time ago it may well take a democrat president to do something nasty aganst terrorists to bring congress, media etc on board to fight the war on terro -- that only a dem could get away with doing what really needs to be done to fight a winning war against them.

I do not think the o is the one to do this, but I'm afraid he had a point.

36 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:34:10 am reply quote

re: #26 Ford_Prefect

I don't know what that means, but it sounds really good so...upding!

Atonio Gramsci.

Again.

Although he was a Marxist, his methods can be used to advance other ideologies.

37 mich-again  12/02/08 9:34:22 am reply quote

Also, the way they invert the adjective "radical" in regards to Islam. In reality, a radical Muslim would promote peace.

38 maddogg  12/02/08 9:34:27 am reply quote

re: #33 Occasional Reader

Actually, I think there's more to it than that. Certainly fear, combined with civilizational self-loathing, combined with a weird "professional ethic" of refusing to "judge". That latter point of course only applies to those who are exotic and "other", not to the likes of evil American conservatives.

The peculiar mental sickness of the West.

39 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  12/02/08 9:34:46 am reply quote

First rule of a fight: Identify your enemy. And the Media doesnt even want to do that.

40 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:34:46 am reply quote

re: #35 TaeJohnDo

Dennis Miller said some time ago it may well take a democrat president to do something nasty aganst terrorists to bring congress, media etc on board to fight the war on terro -- that only a dem could get away with doing what really needs to be done to fight a winning war against them.

I do not think the o is the one to do this, but I'm afraid he had a point.

I am all for giving the ONE a chance to do the right thing.

41 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 9:34:57 am reply quote

Just a slap on the terror-wrist.

42 mean Gene  12/02/08 9:35:11 am reply quote

Even the Investor's Business Daily Editorial Board has taken to calling them all ''nihilists.''
Sad.

43 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:35:34 am reply quote

And yes, it could happen here. Very much so. There are likely plans afoot right at this moment.

Those of you with CCW and training, I would urge you to carry for these next few months, at least. You may be needed.

44 Russkilitlover  12/02/08 9:35:38 am reply quote

It's not so much that the media is "burying its head in the sand," it's more disturbing than that; they are deliberately misleading and redirecting facts, reports, eye witness accounts and even the testimony of a terrorist.

45 harrylook  12/02/08 9:35:48 am reply quote

I've been surprised to hear the word "terrorists" on CNN. I thought they had stopped using the word....

46 Shug  12/02/08 9:36:33 am reply quote

in a similar light : why do artists have the bollocks to paint piss christ and virgin mary in Dung but never a painting or sketch of Mohammed ( even a painting that is flattering to him )?


hint:
ask Theo Van Gogh

47 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:36:38 am reply quote

re: #42 mean Gene

Even the Investor's Business Daily Editorial Board has taken to calling them all ''nihilists.''
Sad.

No "even" about it... IBD has been practically the only clearheaded newspaper on this subject.

48 Son of the Black Dog  12/02/08 9:36:41 am reply quote

re: #32 Golem Akbar

I fear you are right.

I've heard a variation on the saying -
"May your grandchildren live in interesting times."

49 Pyrocles  12/02/08 9:36:50 am reply quote

Yep. They've created a narrative, and they need to stick with it. Can't deviate from their established "progressive" memes.

re: #25 Walter L. Newton

It's out of fear. Fear that their journalist would be targeted, fear that they would loose their sources, fear that they would have to revise everything they have been saying for years if they suddenly had to recognize publicly what is really happening.

They have "reported" themselves into a corner, and they have no way out.

50 Racer X  12/02/08 9:36:55 am reply quote

Silence!

I keel you!

51 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:37:03 am reply quote

re: #45 harrylook

I've been surprised to hear the word "terrorists" on CNN. I thought they had stopped using the word....

They started using the word again after election day.
/

52 Russkilitlover  12/02/08 9:37:31 am reply quote

re: #39 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

First rule of a fight: Identify your enemy. And the Media doesnt even want to do that.

Well then they'd have to admit we are in a fight on not just on the receiving end of just retribution.

53 anti-looter  12/02/08 9:37:37 am reply quote

It would be interesting to see how the MSM would report on an attack, occupation and series of killings in the newsroom of the NYTimes or WaPo. I suspect that the tone would change.

Of course they would have video of various conservative folks passing in ammunition.

54 Ford_Prefect  12/02/08 9:37:48 am reply quote

re: #36 MandyManners

Atonio Gramsci.

Again.

Although he was a Marxist, his methods can be used to advance other ideologies.

Owww oww owww. Now my head hurts. :-(

55 Naso Tang  12/02/08 9:38:02 am reply quote

The Christian Science Monitor is another PC bunch whose worst word is "militant".

56 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:38:19 am reply quote

re: #41 buzzsawmonkey

Just a slap on the terror-wrist.

Oh, you!

57 father_of_10  12/02/08 9:38:22 am reply quote

So, I wonder why there are call centers in India and not Pakistan? Could Islam have something to do with that? Ya think?

58 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:38:23 am reply quote

re: #40 Golem Akbar

I am all for giving the ONE a chance to do the right thing.

Yep. If for no other reason than that we have no other choice.

They say that great men are not born that way, but have greatness thrust upon them. I mean this sincerely; may Obama prove to be a great man.

59 TaeJohnDo  12/02/08 9:38:39 am reply quote

re: #51 Walter L. Newton

They started using the word again after election day.
/


No need to use the sarc tag. With a dem in charge, they can say terroist -- if the dem in charge says terrorist. Miller's point.

60 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:38:41 am reply quote

re: #42 mean Gene

Even the Investor's Business Daily Editorial Board has taken to calling them all ''nihilists.''
Sad.

The west, and especially the US, is tired of the WOT. We are really a peace-loving, dollar-making, people. I understand how Obama got elected, on the hope for peace. I just think it's unrealistic, at this time, to expect it. Maybe Obama will do the right thing, as he now has the information needed to make the same kinds of decisions as does Bush.

61 Pyrocles  12/02/08 9:39:03 am reply quote

Unfortunately, I believe this to be true :(

re: #37 mich-again

Also, the way they invert the adjective "radical" in regards to Islam. In reality, a radical Muslim would promote peace.

62 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:39:27 am reply quote

What would C*gnit* say?

63 Sol Roth  12/02/08 9:39:36 am reply quote
So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists?

Why would the Fifth Column want to denigrate it's military?

64 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:39:52 am reply quote

re: #46 Shug

in a similar light : why do artists have the bollocks to paint piss christ and virgin mary in Dung but never a painting or sketch of Mohammed ( even a painting that is flattering to him )?


hint:
ask Theo Van Gogh


Right. Speaking Truth to power, that overused slogan, is appropriate in Van Gogh's case.

65 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 9:39:52 am reply quote

Back in the hey-day of the media monolith (post WWII), when there was no credible alternative source of news and information, before the day when the internet is readily available to people, this mis-labeling was ignored. The ideology was just as pervasive as is now, but there was no other source.

Then, as now, the MSM doesn't report the news but editorializes opinions.

66 lawhawk  12/02/08 9:40:05 am reply quote

How long will it be before the media stops calling pirates pirates, and instead calls 'em Fremen warriors? /

67 boondocksaint  12/02/08 9:40:29 am reply quote

re: #1 Shug


so sad and so true

68 experiencedtraveller  12/02/08 9:40:31 am reply quote

According to Ted Rall and Noam Chompsky we are the terrorists.

/Ooooooh deep thought man........

69 Shug  12/02/08 9:41:11 am reply quote

re: #53 anti-looter

It would be interesting to see how the MSM would report on an attack, occupation and series of killings in the newsroom of the NYTimes or WaPo. I suspect that the tone would change.

Of course they would have video of various conservative folks passing in ammunition .


eggzactly

70 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:41:15 am reply quote

re: #59 TaeJohnDo

No need to use the sarc tag. With a dem in charge, they can say terroist -- if the dem in charge says terrorist. Miller's point.

(I have to reuse this from my post on the overnight open thread. Shameless self-promotion, but I thought this was clever)

re: #1282 DisturbedEma "By Jove I think you've got it!"

The reign of Hussein lays mainly on the change.

71 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 9:41:24 am reply quote

re: #62 Sharmuta

What would C*gnit* say?

Don't give a rat's ass.

72 mich-again  12/02/08 9:42:12 am reply quote

Death cultists, mass murderers, serial killers, barbarians, psychopaths and Khomeiniists. They could use those descriptions if they don't like the word terrorists.

73 Son of the Black Dog  12/02/08 9:42:26 am reply quote

re: #48 Son of the Black Dog

I've heard a variation on the saying -
"May your grandchildren live in interesting times."

Also, I've heard that "Interesting Times" refers to a particularly bad period (war, famine, plague, etc.) in Chinese history, but I can't quickly find a reference.

74 Charles  12/02/08 9:42:30 am reply quote

re: #66 lawhawk

How long will it be before the media stops calling pirates pirates, and instead calls 'em Fremen warriors?

"Activist sailors."

75 Ojoe  12/02/08 9:42:38 am reply quote

Media = Quislings

76 TaeJohnDo  12/02/08 9:42:44 am reply quote

re: #58 Occasional Reader

Yep. If for no other reason than that we have no other choice.

They say that great men are not born that way, but have greatness thrust upon them. I mean this sincerely; may Obama prove to be a great man.

For Obama to be considered to have a successful presidency by most on this list, he will have to rise very high indeed. But if he wages a full no shit war against terrorism, using every trick in the book -- diplomacy, bribes, the full might of the US Military, I'll give him a passing score.

77 bulwrk  12/02/08 9:42:45 am reply quote

re: #66 lawhawk

Or privateers

78 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:42:57 am reply quote

re: #71 FurryOldGuyJeans

Don't give a rat's ass.

I stuck that in my favorites- for whenever I should need a laugh.

79 Alouette  12/02/08 9:43:01 am reply quote

While the Mumbai monsters were torturing and murdering helpless innocent people, they also took time from their busy schedule to rip apart a Torah scroll.

Keep that in mind the next time the media mentions a Koran being disrespected.

80 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:43:10 am reply quote

The best way to fight this sort of thing is by adjusting our collective consciousness, of course. Oh, and enemas, we have to all get enemas.

/ChopraThink

81 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:43:45 am reply quote

re: #62 Sharmuta

What would C*gnit* say?

Hi Sunshine. Did Cog get the boot again? I haven't seen him in a few days.

(Oh, and I hope you don't mind the "Sunshine," but your avatar combined with your lively name just makes me feel so "sunny" every time I see your posts)

82 karmic_inquisitor  12/02/08 9:43:45 am reply quote

re: #39 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

First rule of a fight: Identify your enemy. And the Media doesnt even want to do that.

Expanding on that, they buy the idea that "dehumanization" creates the context for war, so they seek to not portray monsters and monsters, despite their monstrous acts. In fact, they go as far as to describe the acts clinically - as if they aren't monstrous.

They are at the point that "one step further" would consist of describing victims as people who bled to death or died of lead poisoning.

In one sense, I am surprised to read that the Chabad victims were "tortured". Then again, being Jews they were already "dehumanized" by the media.

83 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:44:00 am reply quote

re: #66 lawhawk

Here in Pittsburgh, the word "pirate" strikes fear in exactly 0 people:) Do you think that most of the MSM still has to consciously avoid certain terminology, or has the latest generation been so schooled as to not even have the so-called "offensive" vocabulary enter into their stream of conscious while writing?

84 redstateredneck  12/02/08 9:44:37 am reply quote

The mainstream media's reluctance to call them terrorists seems to be working. Sunday morning at church, we were going through prayer concerns and had brought up those in India. A woman said, "And do I understand that these people who attacked them were Muslims?
"Duh, " thought I.

85 Racer X  12/02/08 9:44:41 am reply quote

re: #74 Charles

"Activist sailors."

Barbary Pirates more like.

Jefferson would be ashamed of how weak America has become.

86 karmic_inquisitor  12/02/08 9:44:51 am reply quote

re: #74 Charles

"Activist sailors."

That or "boat operators".

87 Shug  12/02/08 9:45:06 am reply quote

Swashbucklers for truth

88 rabidsquirrel  12/02/08 9:45:18 am reply quote

re: #74 Charles

"Activist sailors."

Disadvantaged maritime entrepreneurs

89 2by2  12/02/08 9:45:33 am reply quote

excellent article, at least some journalists seem to take notice; here is another one from todays' NY POST by Abraham Cooper and Harold Brackman.

90 maddogg  12/02/08 9:45:35 am reply quote

Aquatic Organizers.

91 mich-again  12/02/08 9:45:37 am reply quote

re: #74 Charles

"Activist sailors."

Maritime anarchists.

92 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 9:45:40 am reply quote

re: #2 Nevergiveup

If you can't name the enemy, it really gets hard to defeat them.

The MSM can name the enemy, they just willfully choose not to do so.

94 Sol Roth  12/02/08 9:45:42 am reply quote

re: #68 experiencedtraveller

According to Ted Rall and Noam Chompsky we are the terrorists.

...because the US military kills their soldiers. The people "we" call terrorists.

Why should we care what motivates the Fifth Column if it enables evil to kill us? It should be enough to kick the shit out of them that they do.

95 Shug  12/02/08 9:45:59 am reply quote

Maritime community organizers

96 Pyrocles  12/02/08 9:46:00 am reply quote

Jihadists are anything but "nihilists". They believe so strongly and completely in their supposed "divine" mission, that they are willing and glad to kill themselves in the process. They do have great faith in Allah, and are willing to put that faith into practice while "moderate" Muslims (another target of the Jihadists) just sit back and watch.

re: #42 mean Gene

Even the Investor's Business Daily Editorial Board has taken to calling them all ''nihilists.''
Sad.

97 chicagodudewhotrades  12/02/08 9:46:05 am reply quote

Anybody think Mumbai increases the chances of a actual shooting war between India/Pakistan? They have gone to war about 3 times since partition (4 if you include the brief but serious skirmish about a decade ago when pakistan moved troops onto some heights claimed by India) . The past wars were conventional (thank god) . but now that both have nukes, this can get real ugly real fast. At the very least, since there has been some saber-rattling by both nations since the end of the attack and the associated movement of troops to the border. does anybody think whoever planned this did it in the hope that Pakistan would shift troops from the tribal areas to the border? Which is exactly what pakistan has done. with less troops in the tribal areas, that gives AQ and thier buddies some breathing room

98 Who Watches the Watchmen?  12/02/08 9:46:07 am reply quote

re: #66 lawhawk

How long will it be before the media stops calling pirates pirates, and instead calls 'em Fremen warriors? /

I've mentioned this before, but I heard somebody on my local moonbat radio station giving "big props" to the pirates.

99 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:46:08 am reply quote

re: #62 Sharmuta

What would C*gnit* say?

101 Ways to Excuse the MFM.

100 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:46:31 am reply quote

re: #99 MandyManners

101 Ways to Excuse the MFM.

His forthcoming book!

101 TaeJohnDo  12/02/08 9:46:38 am reply quote

re: #70 Walter L. Newton

The reign of Hussein lays mainly on the change.


Very good!

(And I am afraid reality is going to rain on his parade.)

102 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:46:49 am reply quote

re: #79 Alouette

While the Mumbai monsters were torturing and murdering helpless innocent people, they also took time from their busy schedule to rip apart a Torah scroll.

Keep that in mind the next time the media mentions a Koran being disrespected.

So you're about to go out and riot and burn cars, right?

Waddya mean "no"?!

103 Ford_Prefect  12/02/08 9:46:58 am reply quote

re: #95 Shug

Maritime community organizers

Oceanic Entrepreneurs.

104 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:47:07 am reply quote

re: #85 Racer X

Barbary Pirates more like.

Jefferson would be ashamed of how weak America has become.


Not that I expect it, but Obama has the opportunity to become the new Jefferson. He hasn't taken office, yet, and anything could happen. He could do the right thing. In a few days we'll know if the US made a mistake, or got it right.

105 Who Watches the Watchmen?  12/02/08 9:47:08 am reply quote

re: #94 Sol Roth

...because the US military kills their soldiers. The people "we" call terrorists.

What used to be called "making the other bastards die for their country."

106 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:47:15 am reply quote

re: #87 Shug

Very seriously, how long before a "major" U.S. periodical runs a front page sympathy piece on the root causes (read "it's somehow amazingly your fault) of African piracy?
I'll wager three months, sooner if a tourist ship is taken.

107 Sol Roth  12/02/08 9:47:20 am reply quote

re: #90 maddogg

Aquatic Organizers.

HA!

108 Max Darkside  12/02/08 9:47:28 am reply quote
So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists?

Because of their mental disability to see right from wrong, that everyone is the same, and from this springs moral equivalency. So, if they see one group being labeled, they are compelled to find counter examples, no matter how rare to prove to themselves that their beliefs are sound. Like economic socialism, this moral socialism pulls all to the same lowest common denominator, that we are are all equally evil.

109 redstateredneck  12/02/08 9:47:34 am reply quote

Disenfranchised deckhands?

110 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:47:35 am reply quote

re: #74 Charles

"Activist sailors."

Non-traditional maritime traders.

111 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:47:41 am reply quote

OT - a little weather from the front range of Colorado.

Yesterday it was in the 30's and last night we had wind gusts in the 60-70's. Power went out in my apartment unit because the wind knocked something out last night. Today, we will have temps at almost 70. Now the winds have started up again and by tonight, it will be in the 20's and snowing. Snow showers through Thursday. Colorado weather, you got to love it (or leave it).

Walter in Golden, Co.

112 Ojoe  12/02/08 9:47:58 am reply quote

re: #76 TaeJohnDo

Obama can wage war without the stigma of "a white person attacking the third world". Also he has Muslim background; he will escape the "Crusader" charge from many quarters. And, the media will give him a pass because he has that "D".

We may be surprised.

113 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:48:02 am reply quote

re: #96 Pyrocles

They will cut off your Johnson!

114 redc1c4  12/02/08 9:48:21 am reply quote

re: #1 Shug

Fear Cowardice

fixed that for ya!

/semantics, i know, but still....... %-)

115 TaeJohnDo  12/02/08 9:48:22 am reply quote

re: #80 Occasional Reader

The best way to fight this sort of thing is by adjusting our collective consciousness, of course. Oh, and enemas, we have to all get enemas.

/ChopraThink


Poo Hoo! Now that is what I call a pain in the ass!

Talk about raining on a parade!

116 DeafDog  12/02/08 9:48:27 am reply quote

re: #85 Racer X

Barbary Pirates more like.

Jefferson would be ashamed of how weak America has become.

It's political correctness on steroids.

We are being told to be ashamed of what was built by our forefathers. We are being told that what was built is wrong and that we should not try to continue their legacy.

Stop the world. I want to get off.

117 maddogg  12/02/08 9:48:32 am reply quote

The Water Borne Disadvantaged.

118 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:48:34 am reply quote

re: #68 experiencedtraveller

According to Ted Rall and Noam Chompsky we are the terrorists.

/Ooooooh deep thought man........

And Deepak Chopra, don't forget him.

119 experiencedtraveller  12/02/08 9:48:35 am reply quote

re: #74 Charles

"Activist sailors."

ex-Wall Street executives.

120 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:48:35 am reply quote

re: #111 Walter L. Newton

You remind me of "Banquet Beer."

121 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:48:41 am reply quote

re: #85 Racer X

Barbary Pirates more like.

Jefferson would be ashamed of how weak America has become.


You'd think that one, single carrier strike group could put an end to this phenomenon over the course of a weekend.

122 taxfreekiller  12/02/08 9:48:43 am reply quote

Humpty-Dumpty sat on the fence,
Humpty-Dumpty thought he could not fall,
Humpty-Dumpty had not a care at all,

Then all the imams terror trained children took fine bead,
and with Ak-47 did down off the wall shoot every Humpty-Dumpty
and all who they did lie to about it all.

msm lies, its what they are,

broken they will be shot in the back by the ones they now protect with lies

123 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 9:48:48 am reply quote

re: #99 MandyManners

101 Ways to Excuse the MFM.

The very reason why I would prefer to get an opinion on things from a flatulent Great Dane than him.

124 Texas Heathen  12/02/08 9:48:53 am reply quote

re: #84 redstateredneck

{redstate}
Did you smack your forehead and shake your head when she asked that?

125 redc1c4  12/02/08 9:49:09 am reply quote

re: #100 Sharmuta

His forthcoming book!

hopefully with lots of pictures for him and his fans to color.....

126 FrogMarch  12/02/08 9:49:16 am reply quote

The left secretly adore Michael Moore and have latched onto his tiny privates (in a back room in the dark).

There is no terrorism. Remember?

Terrorism cannot exist when the dominate left-wing media have an agenda to push.

127 redstateredneck  12/02/08 9:49:16 am reply quote

re: #111 Walter L. Newton

OT - a little weather from the front range of Colorado.

Yesterday it was in the 30's and last night we had wind gusts in the 60-70's. Power went out in my apartment unit because the wind knocked something out last night. Today, we will have temps at almost 70. Now the winds have started up again and by tonight, it will be in the 20's and snowing. Snow showers through Thursday. Colorado weather, you got to love it (or leave it).

Walter in Golden, Co.

But it's a dry kind of cold, right?
;-)

128 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:49:48 am reply quote

re: #120 Bumr50

You remind me of "Banquet Beer."

WHAT? Explanation please. Should I be worried?

129 Sol Roth  12/02/08 9:49:49 am reply quote

re: #105 Who Watches the Watchmen?

What used to be called "making the other bastards die for their country."

Hatespeech! Call the ACLU! Racistbigotedislamophobicrethuglican!

/

130 unreconstructed rebel  12/02/08 9:50:10 am reply quote

re: #112 Ojoe

Obama can wage war without the stigma of "a white person attacking the third world". Also he has Muslim background; he will escape the "Crusader" charge from many quarters. And, the media will give him a pass because he has that "D".

We may be surprised.

& he will prolly do it with a reconstituted draft.

/wait 'til my Obama-voting young friends get their minds around that one.

131 redstateredneck  12/02/08 9:50:14 am reply quote

re: #124 Texas Heathen

{redstate}
Did you smack your forehead and shake your head when she asked that?

I did some serious eye-rollin'.

132 rexatosis  12/02/08 9:50:19 am reply quote

The MSM, having bought into the multicultural concept that all cultures being relatively equal, cannot allow itself to use any terms which may actually convey a value judgement. To give an action or person a value-ladened term which could be described as "evil" would mean "evil" exists and to do so shatters their preconceived notion of multicultural "relativity." So in order to preserve their cherished concept of "multiculturalism" they tie themselves in knots to avoid admitting there "evil" in the world. The west has seen this before with the willful ignorance of the evils of Facism, Nazism, and Communism.

133 DeafDog  12/02/08 9:50:20 am reply quote

re: #97 chicagodudewhotrades

does anybody think whoever planned this did it in the hope that Pakistan would shift troops from the tribal areas to the border? Which is exactly what pakistan has done. with less troops in the tribal areas, that gives AQ and thier buddies some breathing room

Bingo!

134 Nevergiveup  12/02/08 9:50:26 am reply quote

re: #93 Occasional Reader

And apropos of the topic, sort of:

National Review Editors: Obama's national security/foreign policy team doesn't suck nearly as much as we had feared.

One should remember that Obama's foreign policy team resembles Bush's present team. Those of us here have not been all that thrilled with the policy or results ( outside of the surge ) the last few years. The Bush Foreign policy of the early years, the old "your with us or gainst us" is no more. So?

135 TaeJohnDo  12/02/08 9:50:43 am reply quote

re: #110 Occasional Reader

Non-traditional maritime traders.


Aarg!tists.

136 pre-Boomer Marine brat  12/02/08 9:50:54 am reply quote

re: #20 MandyManners

GALLOPING GRAMSCIAN WHORES OF THE CALIPHATE!

I come in late, and find the battle cry has been given!
My day is made, Mandy.

137 Sol Roth  12/02/08 9:50:56 am reply quote

re: #108 Max Darkside

Because of their mental disability to see right from wrong, that everyone is the same, and from this springs moral equivalency. So, if they see one group being labeled, they are compelled to find counter examples, no matter how rare to prove to themselves that their beliefs are sound. Like economic socialism, this moral socialism pulls all to the same lowest common denominator, that we are are all equally evil.

Wow, that's good. Never thought of it that way.

138 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:50:57 am reply quote

re: #81 Walter L. Newton

I don't mind the nic name, Walter.

139 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 9:51:05 am reply quote

re: #112 Ojoe

Obama can wage war without the stigma of "a white person attacking the third world". Also he has Muslim background; he will escape the "Crusader" charge from many quarters. And, the media will give him a pass because he has that "D".

We may be surprised.


Let's hope and pray.
(last weekend I heard a lefty talk show host blasting Obama for appointing the centrist-Hillary).

140 Pyrocles  12/02/08 9:51:06 am reply quote

No one cuts off my (Charles) Johnson. A day without LGF is like a day without, well, air!

re: #113 Bumr50

They will cut off your Johnson!

141 Ringo the Gringo  12/02/08 9:51:14 am reply quote
So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists?

The jihadist-multicultural alliance

142 father_of_10  12/02/08 9:51:17 am reply quote

re: #97 chicagodudewhotrades

Anybody think Mumbai increases the chances of a actual shooting war between India/Pakistan? They have gone to war about 3 times since partition (4 if you include the brief but serious skirmish about a decade ago when pakistan moved troops onto some heights claimed by India) . The past wars were conventional (thank god) . but now that both have nukes, this can get real ugly real fast. At the very least, since there has been some saber-rattling by both nations since the end of the attack and the associated movement of troops to the border. does anybody think whoever planned this did it in the hope that Pakistan would shift troops from the tribal areas to the border? Which is exactly what pakistan has done. with less troops in the tribal areas, that gives AQ and thier buddies some breathing room

I'll put money on India. After having lived in Pakistan for a few years, and visiting Idia several times, I would say that Pakistan's ability to make their nuclear weapon systems function appropriately is almost nil. India has top notch technicians and soldiers. Pakistan is another parasitic Islamic piss hole.

143 CIA Reject  12/02/08 9:51:31 am reply quote

re: #105 Who Watches the Watchmen?

What used to be called "making the other bastards die for their country."

Which is the only sure way to "end a war". You do it often enough and eventually the other side quits.

A very simple concept that seems to be completely beyond the comprehension of modern "liberals".

144 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:51:51 am reply quote

re: #110 Occasional Reader

Non-traditional maritime traders.

Bay Traders.

145 Ojoe  12/02/08 9:52:02 am reply quote

re: #130 unreconstructed rebel

IMHO we will see things like this and more;

Eventually the West will win; Islam will not be eliminated without a big fight and in the big picture it does not stand a chance.

146 karmic_inquisitor  12/02/08 9:52:16 am reply quote

BTW - Ted Rall has figured everything out for us again.

We are killing brides in Afghanistan and paying of Somali pirates all to protect George Bush.

Oh - and we employ psychotic people to join our Special Forces.

I feel so enlightened now.

Can't wait for his commentary on the Mumbai attacks mass bleedings!

147 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:52:18 am reply quote

re: #128 Walter L. Newton


Banquet Beer.

Banquet Beer.

148 Racer X  12/02/08 9:52:28 am reply quote

re: #121 Occasional Reader

You'd think that one, single carrier strike group could put an end to this phenomenon over the course of a weekend.

I'm thinking we need bait. An oil tanker with about 20 Navy Seals aboard. And lots and lots of weapons. As soon as the pirates show up - BLAMMO!

Next.

149 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 9:52:32 am reply quote

re: #132 rexatosis

The MFM can express a values judgment; when it denigrates the very civilization and country that was able to create the technology they exploit to sow their seeds of sedition, treason, and corruption.

150 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:53:00 am reply quote

The real pirates are the US Navy.

/

151 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:53:08 am reply quote

re: #132 rexatosis

The MSM, having bought into the multicultural concept that all cultures being relatively equal, cannot allow itself to use any terms which may actually convey a value judgement. To give an action or person a value-ladened term which could be described as "evil" would mean "evil" exists and to do so shatters their preconceived notion of multicultural "relativity." So in order to preserve their cherished concept of "multiculturalism" they tie themselves in knots to avoid admitting there "evil" in the world. The west has seen this before with the willful ignorance of the evils of Facism, Nazism, and Communism.

The effects of Gramsci.

152 Sharmuta  12/02/08 9:53:21 am reply quote

re: #117 maddogg

The Water Borne Disadvantaged.

See- that's where I think that will go. How long until these aren't pirates, but instead sympathetic figures driven by hard poverty to take on a ruthless job so they can feed their ten kids at home. *sniff*

/It's coming. You heard it here first.

153 Joo-LiZ  12/02/08 9:53:36 am reply quote

Along the same lines: Caroline Glick on the Jihadi-Multiculturalist alliance.

In the aftermath of the Mumbai massacres, it is hard to imagine that there is anything as pernicious as the jihadists who sought out and murdered non-Muslims with such cruelty. But there is. Their multicultural apologists, who enable them to continue to kill by preventing their victims from fighting back, are just as evil.

RTWT

154 Nevergiveup  12/02/08 9:53:42 am reply quote

re: #150 Occasional Reader

The real pirates are the US Navy.

/

Then why don't I get payed better?

155 ontheleftcoast  12/02/08 9:53:51 am reply quote

But now even conservative media may be doing it too.

Maybe that's connected to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud's large voting stake in News Corp (Fox News, Wall Street Journal)

156 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  12/02/08 9:54:09 am reply quote

re: #146 karmic_inquisitor

BTW - Ted Rall has figured everything out for us again.

We are killing brides in Afghanistan and paying of Somali pirates all to protect George Bush.

Oh - and we employ psychotic people to join our Special Forces.

I feel so enlightened now.

Can't wait for his commentary on the Mumbai attacks mass bleedings!

Shit scraps Ted Rall off its shoes.

157 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:54:13 am reply quote

re: #147 Bumr50

Banquet Beer.

Banquet Beer.

Oh heavens. Even when I was a professional drinker, I wouldn't touch that stuff. You insult me, my good man!
/

158 Max Darkside  12/02/08 9:54:16 am reply quote

re: #137 Sol Roth

Wow, that's good. Never thought of it that way.

Thank you. Go ding me up... I'm suffering from KDS ("Karma Deficiency Syndrome")

159 redstateredneck  12/02/08 9:54:17 am reply quote

re: #147 Bumr50

Banquet Beer.

Banquet Beer.

That was worth it just to be carded.

160 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:54:19 am reply quote

re: #146 karmic_inquisitor

Oh - and we employ psychotic people to join our Special Forces.

I would gladly sponsor Rall to give that speech at a nice little place I know in Fayetteville, NC.

161 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 9:54:24 am reply quote

re: #153 Joo-LiZ

What does RTWT mean?

162 paint-right  12/02/08 9:54:50 am reply quote

re: #109 redstateredneck

Disenfranchised deckhands?

disenfranchised deck WORKERS.

C'mon people. Workers!

( and boy is that word used continuously in the MSM especially when they talk AROUND labor issues )

gaaah!

163 Spiny Norman  12/02/08 9:54:59 am reply quote

re: #97 chicagodudewhotrades

Anybody think Mumbai increases the chances of a actual shooting war between India/Pakistan? They have gone to war about 3 times since partition (4 if you include the brief but serious skirmish about a decade ago when pakistan moved troops onto some heights claimed by India) . The past wars were conventional (thank god) . but now that both have nukes, this can get real ugly real fast. At the very least, since there has been some saber-rattling by both nations since the end of the attack and the associated movement of troops to the border. does anybody think whoever planned this did it in the hope that Pakistan would shift troops from the tribal areas to the border? Which is exactly what pakistan has done. with less troops in the tribal areas, that gives AQ and thier buddies some breathing room

I think that is part of the plan. An actual shooting war between India and Pakistan would be the answer to their dreams.

164 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:55:05 am reply quote

re: #154 Nevergiveup

Seize the booty!

165 taxfreekiller  12/02/08 9:55:10 am reply quote

Its a water planet.
Rule the water, you rule all.
Rule not all the water, you do not rule at all.

Go Navy.

166 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:55:34 am reply quote

re: #154 Nevergiveup

Then why don't I get payed better?

Tell your captain to shake your booty.

167 MandyManners  12/02/08 9:55:44 am reply quote

re: #164 Bumr50

Seize the booty!

Keep yer hands off my booty.

168 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:55:51 am reply quote

re: #161 buzzsawmonkey

What does RTWT mean?

Oh come on Buzz. You should be able to knock out a whole song parody over those four letters.

169 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  12/02/08 9:56:03 am reply quote

re: #164 Bumr50

Seize the booty!

Swab the poop deck!

170 Joo-LiZ  12/02/08 9:56:28 am reply quote

re: #161 buzzsawmonkey

What does RTWT mean?

Read The Whole Thing

171 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 9:56:32 am reply quote

re: #168 Walter L. Newton

Oh come on Buzz. You should be able to knock out a whole song parody over those four letters.

Maybe--but I have to know what they stand for first.

172 LGoPs  12/02/08 9:56:51 am reply quote

The media / liberals have no problem identifying enemies. Look at how they treat anyone on the right. It's a question of their basic values....conservatism represents the enemy while everything else just needs to be understood....
Truly a mental disorder.

173 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:56:52 am reply quote

re: #157 Walter L. Newton

Sorry. When I drank, sadly, I was not so choosy. But if there were options, I didn't drink it either.

174 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:56:57 am reply quote

re: #161 buzzsawmonkey

What does RTWT mean?

Read The Whole... oh, you know.

/irony, see

175 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 9:56:59 am reply quote

re: #170 Joo-LiZ

Read The Whole Thing

Thank you. I usually do.

176 Racer X  12/02/08 9:57:07 am reply quote

All this pirate talk and no Loflyer.

177 CIA Reject  12/02/08 9:57:10 am reply quote

re: #121 Occasional Reader

You'd think that one, single carrier strike group Burke class destroyer could put an end to this phenomenon over the course of a weekend.

No need to engage in overkill.

178 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 9:57:20 am reply quote

Lunch. Hungry. Must eat to survive.

179 Nevergiveup  12/02/08 9:57:44 am reply quote

re: #166 Occasional Reader

Tell your captain to shake your booty.

Well unlike Tom Cruise, There is no Female Captain in my unit yet. Actually no female superior yet either.

180 pre-Boomer Marine brat  12/02/08 9:57:45 am reply quote

re: #135 TaeJohnDo

Aarg!tists.

Heh.
Is Loflyer in the room?

BTW, your avatar is great!

181 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:57:48 am reply quote

re: #172 LGoPs

It's easy when humility is relative and arrogance is "a stifling construct."

182 maddogg  12/02/08 9:57:56 am reply quote

You know, lives will be lost to these murderers, who would kill you for the buttons on your shirt, and a simgle .50 bmg mounted on the stern of the ship would prevent it all. Cheap insurance if you ask me. But self defense goes against the grain of the brain dead left.

183 Iron Fist  12/02/08 9:58:13 am reply quote

re: #98 Who Watches the Watchmen?

You should find out when the dicklick leaves work. Meet him in the parking lot, and liberate his wallet. And his clothes. See how he enjoys being on the receiving end.

184 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 9:58:13 am reply quote

Talk Like a Somali Pirate Day: Allahu AkbAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR!

185 experiencedtraveller  12/02/08 9:58:38 am reply quote

re: #178 Occasional Reader

Lunch. Hungry. Must eat to survive.

Absolutist.

186 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:58:48 am reply quote

re: #179 Nevergiveup

Plenty of Female Captains out here in civvy-land!

187 Joo-LiZ  12/02/08 9:59:22 am reply quote

re: #184 buzzsawmonkey

Talk Like a Somali Pirate Day: Allahu AkbAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR!

brilliant.

188 Bumr50  12/02/08 9:59:23 am reply quote

re: #184 buzzsawmonkey

Where was Sinbad from? Not the unfunny one.

189 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 9:59:31 am reply quote

re: #173 Bumr50

Sorry. When I drank, sadly, I was not so choosy. But if there were options, I didn't drink it either.

First off, I wasn't being mean or anything, just funnin'.

But, I know what you meant. My sole goal was to drink as cheap and as strong as I could and still wake up sober in the morning. So, a 6 pack of Mickey's and two pints of Southern was my evening snack. Every evening, for almost 20 years.

190 lawhawk  12/02/08 9:59:37 am reply quote

re: #74 Charles

"Activist sailors."

Undocumented seafarers.

191 DocDale  12/02/08 10:00:07 am reply quote

This failure to call something for what it really is went from mildly irritating to throwing stuff at the telly infuriating this week. Maybe it's because there are so many Indian graduate students at Oxford, all of them wonderful ambassadors for their country, quite apart from being super bright and interesting to boot. One guy in my staircase is from Mumbai, and he lost his sister in this carnage (at the railway station).

'Gunman' in particular doesn't cut it. My brother is a 'gunman' when he's at the range. At various points in my life I've been a 'gunwoman'. If the media do have some overarching narrative that excludes the use of the word 'terrorist', then we need to start calling them on it. It really is downright disrespectful of the people that have been killed, otherwise.

192 chicagodudewhotrades  12/02/08 10:00:09 am reply quote

re: #188 Bumr50

Basra

193 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 10:00:32 am reply quote

re: #188 Bumr50

Where was Sinbad from? Not the unfunny one.

Basra, I think.

194 Walter L. Newton  12/02/08 10:00:49 am reply quote

re: #190 lawhawk

Undocumented seafarers.

Allahnauts!

195 Nevergiveup  12/02/08 10:00:52 am reply quote

re: #186 Bumr50

Plenty of Female Captains out here in civvy-land!

Well I live with an Admiral? Sometimes goes by the title of wife?

196 pre-Boomer Marine brat  12/02/08 10:00:54 am reply quote

re: #169 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Good morning. How's the (cough cough) "retail" thing going (yesterday, body parts). I'm surprised to see you on your feet today.

*grin*

197 SasquatchOnSteroids  12/02/08 10:01:04 am reply quote

Water vessel rights activists

198 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 10:01:13 am reply quote

re: #155 ontheleftcoast

But now even conservative media may be doing it too.

Maybe that's connected to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud's large voting stake in News Corp (Fox News, Wall Street Journal)

FNC ain't conservative, never has been; they only appeared conservative in contrast to the Uber-Left of the rest of the MFM.

The WSJ has always been more interested in what the markets in NY are doing than what is happening in the rest of the world, unless it impinges upon our markets. Easier to see terrorist attacks as isolated incidents so as to better hide the vulnerabilities of the Western economies than confront the truth that there is a cultural economic war being waged that has been waged for centuries now.

199 paint-right  12/02/08 10:01:35 am reply quote

re: #155 ontheleftcoast

But now even conservative media may be doing it too.

Maybe that's connected to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud's large voting stake in News Corp (Fox News, Wall Street Journal)

I saw him interviewed over the weekend by Maria Bartiromo and it was priceless. He was sitting and behind him were two camels and a black horse. He seemed to be near the stables or something. I was riveted. ( hoping for camelish misbehvior, I must admit)
He was discussing Citicorp and poor management. His opinion was that under new management the only way from here is up.

200 Sol Roth  12/02/08 10:01:46 am reply quote

re: #158 Max Darkside

Thank you. Go ding me up... I'm suffering from KDS ("Karma Deficiency Syndrome")

Electronic Karma Slavery: worship the button that feeds your ego.

201 bulwrk  12/02/08 10:01:49 am reply quote

re: #177 CIA Reject

Actually this seems like the type of job the new LCS was built for

202 lawhawk  12/02/08 10:02:09 am reply quote

re: #150 Occasional Reader

The real pirates are the US Navy.

/

According to this Bollywood "actor", you're not far from the mark. Also note that he's wearing that shirt the day the attacks in Mumbai began.

203 Joo-LiZ  12/02/08 10:02:12 am reply quote

I noticed the whole lack-of-talking-about-the-chabad-house thing as it was happening.

Although, on CNN, I thought I heard one of the anchor's mention quickly between talk of the two hotels that there was a "media blackout" surrounding the Israeli-hostage situation at the "jewish house", and they would bring more info as soon as they could.

Could that explain anything? And what exactly would that mean?

204 Ford_Prefect  12/02/08 10:02:28 am reply quote

Saltwater Socialists (Redistribute the booty!)

205 pre-Boomer Marine brat  12/02/08 10:02:42 am reply quote

re: #184 buzzsawmonkey

Allahu AkbAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR!

*rimshot*

206 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 10:02:44 am reply quote

re: #188 Bumr50

Where was Sinbad from? Not the unfunny one.

That's it! We need to unleash terrifying Claymation figures against the Somali pirates.

207 Racer X  12/02/08 10:02:47 am reply quote

re: #189 Walter L. Newton

So, a 6 pack of Mickey's and two pints of Southern was my evening snack. Every evening, for almost 20 years.


Yikes!

208 NYCHardhat  12/02/08 10:02:58 am reply quote

I will repeat my mantra until I am blue in the face. The media is the enemy and it must be destroyed.

209 CyanSnowHawk  12/02/08 10:03:04 am reply quote

re: #118 Walter L. Newton

And Deepak Chopra, don't forget him.

He's apparently blaming the Mumbai attacks on us already. All those enemas must be affecting his brain.

210 Occasional Reader  12/02/08 10:03:08 am reply quote

Okay, NOW lunch.

211 MandyManners  12/02/08 10:03:16 am reply quote

re: #202 lawhawk

According to this Bollywood "actor", you're not far from the mark. Also note that he's wearing that shirt the day the attacks in Mumbai began.

Maybe he should be shipped to Waziristan.

212 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  12/02/08 10:03:38 am reply quote

re: #196 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Good morning. How's the (cough cough) "retail" thing going (yesterday, body parts). I'm surprised to see you on your feet today.

*grin*

The tripod thing has its other advantages, plus the palace staff here in Kragaristan helped.

213 MandyManners  12/02/08 10:03:40 am reply quote

re: #210 Occasional Reader

Okay, NOW lunch.

You're gonna' eat with women who don't shave their legs?

214 Bumr50  12/02/08 10:03:49 am reply quote

re: #183 Iron Fist

re: #189 Walter L. Newton

Ouch. I haven't touched anything for about 18 months now, and I think my body is finally starting to thank me after 14 years of abuse.
Glad to hear you're doing well!:)

215 pre-Boomer Marine brat  12/02/08 10:04:06 am reply quote

re: #200 Sol Roth

Electronic Karma Slavery: worship the button that feeds your ego.

Charles has created a bunch of Pavlovian lizards, hasn't he!

216 CIA Reject  12/02/08 10:04:09 am reply quote

re: #190 lawhawk

Undocumented seafarers.

"Maritime youths" which can quickly morph into "Somali Sea Scouts"...

217 Joo-LiZ  12/02/08 10:04:30 am reply quote

re: #209 CyanSnowHawk

He's apparently blaming the Mumbai attacks on us already. All those enemas must be affecting his brain.

but... but... but...

happy thoughts make happy molecules! how can the mind behind such brilliant philosophies direct any blame for such an atrocity ANYWHERE?

218 Shug  12/02/08 10:04:38 am reply quote

re: #114 redc1c4

fixed that for ya!

/semantics, i know, but still....... %-)

much better. I agree.

All Heros have fear but they show bravery.
Cowards have fear and run

219 Bumr50  12/02/08 10:04:41 am reply quote

re: #183 Iron Fist

Sorry:| I wasn't replying to you. My bad. Mouse error.

220 Billy Hank  12/02/08 10:04:44 am reply quote

re: #43 Occasional Reader

By chance, just got back from a five day defensive handgun and CCW course. Serendipity?

221 Joo-LiZ  12/02/08 10:04:46 am reply quote

re: #217 Joo-LiZ

but... but... but...

happy thoughts make happy molecules! how can the mind behind such brilliant philosophies direct any blame for such an atrocity ANYWHERE?

/ as if it is needed.

222 nyc redneck  12/02/08 10:05:00 am reply quote

it is astounding to see the these ridiculous fools go thru such absurd contortions to cover for MOSLEM terrorists.
"practitioners", is almost laughable if it wasn't such a pathetic dereliction of duty.

he called these torturer/killers fcking "practitioners"
and they must be laughing their asses off wondering how they will be referred to next. "advocates" "organizers" "coordinators" "adjustors"
there's a few possibilities for the hyper p.c. cowards who just want to make it nice for the barbarians.
assholes.

223 pre-Boomer Marine brat  12/02/08 10:05:04 am reply quote

re: #212 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

The tripod thing has its other advantages, plus the palace staff here in Kragaristan helped.

LOL

224 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 10:05:39 am reply quote

re: #218 Shug

much better. I agree.

All Heros have fear but they show bravery.
Cowards have fear and run

"Cowards die many times before their death. The valiant never taste of death but once."

--I forget who

225 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 10:05:40 am reply quote

re: #213 MandyManners

You're gonna' eat with women who don't shave their legs?

I would. But then I am rather biased in that respect. ;)

226 Ford_Prefect  12/02/08 10:05:41 am reply quote

re: #213 MandyManners

You're gonna' eat with women who don't shave their legs?

She said it kept her warmer...what?
/

227 redstateredneck  12/02/08 10:05:53 am reply quote

re: #204 Ford_Prefect

(Redistribute the booty!)


I've been spending hours in the gym trying to redistribute my booty.

228 NYCHardhat  12/02/08 10:06:19 am reply quote

re: #222 nyc redneck

it is astounding to see the these ridiculous fools go thru such absurd contortions to cover for MOSLEM terrorists.
"practitioners", is almost laughable if it wasn't such a pathetic dereliction of duty.

he called these torturer/killers fcking "practitioners"
and they must be laughing their asses off wondering how they will be referred to next. "advocates" "organizers" "coordinators" "adjustors"
there's a few possibilities for the hyper p.c. cowards who just want to make it nice for the barbarians.
assholes.

Obamanations? Community Organizers?

229 Texas Heathen  12/02/08 10:06:32 am reply quote

re: #209 CyanSnowHawk

He's apparently blaming the Mumbai attacks on us already. All those enemas must be affecting his brain.

That's what happens when you have sh*t for brains.

230 Iron Fist  12/02/08 10:06:32 am reply quote

re: #177 CIA Reject

Overkill is fun. It keeps the jihadis on their toes, and contributes to the local economy. Like paying taxes, overkill is the new Patriotism.

231 Ford_Prefect  12/02/08 10:06:41 am reply quote

re: #219 Bumr50

Sorry:| I wasn't replying to you. My bad. Mouse error.

Mickey Malfunction?

232 father_of_10  12/02/08 10:06:48 am reply quote

re: #208 NYCHardhat

I will repeat my mantra until I am blue in the face. The media is the enemy and it must be destroyed.

I think that says it right there.

233 CIA Reject  12/02/08 10:06:55 am reply quote

re: #201 bulwrk

Cool! Are these currently in service?

234 pre-Boomer Marine brat  12/02/08 10:07:39 am reply quote

re: #227 redstateredneck

I've been spending hours in the gym trying to redistribute my booty.

Gives new meaning to being (a) "Bunny".

235 Eowyn2  12/02/08 10:07:44 am reply quote

if it hasn't been said:

I propose we call them
FTC
Fucking Terrorist Cowards

Did everyone catch the whiney ass that got caught and then cried like a little girl?

236 Golem Akbar  12/02/08 10:08:07 am reply quote

Free-lance Buccaneers?

237 Iron Fist  12/02/08 10:08:23 am reply quote

re: #182 maddogg

You can get a semi-auto M-2 complete with everything you need to knock big holes in little boats for under ten grand. Sounds like a wise investment to me.

238 bulwrk  12/02/08 10:08:41 am reply quote

re: #233 CIA Reject

LCS Freedom is doing its shakedown cruise.

239 Sol Roth  12/02/08 10:08:43 am reply quote

re: #217 Joo-LiZ

but... but... but...

happy thoughts make happy molecules! how can the mind behind such brilliant philosophies direct any blame for such an atrocity ANYWHERE?

Chopra is fond of the Enema Path to Enlightenment as well.

Yes, he likes waterbooty.

240 Eowyn2  12/02/08 10:08:52 am reply quote

re: #209 CyanSnowHawk

He's apparently blaming the Mumbai attacks on us already. All those enemas must be affecting his brain.

Yes and the revolt of 1857 was because of Clay's Compromise?

241 Arlemagne  12/02/08 10:08:54 am reply quote

It is said that all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for "good" people to stand by and do nothing.

The journalists who minimize and make excuses for the monsters who perpetrated these attacks are doing their best to make sure that others stand by and do nothing. To them I have one thing to say:

Next time, I hope it is you. Next time I hope it is your family. Next time I hope it's your children.

242 Racer X  12/02/08 10:08:55 am reply quote

re: #235 Eowyn2

Did everyone catch the whiney ass that got caught and then cried like a little girl?


They ALL cry like little girls when caught.

243 snopercod  12/02/08 10:09:07 am reply quote

re: #50 Racer X

Silence!

I keel you!

Stop touching my a$$!

244 maddogg  12/02/08 10:09:12 am reply quote

I just had a great idea! The thought of going on a cruise makes my EEG flatline. I mean, really, I would die from boredom.

However, if someone were to offer a cruise where you go round the horn of Africa, and everybody gets a scoped rifle, and you get to shoot at pirates......well, I could warm up to that.

245 FrogMarch  12/02/08 10:09:23 am reply quote
246 FurryOldGuyJeans  12/02/08 10:09:25 am reply quote

re: #235 Eowyn2

if it hasn't been said:

I propose we call them
FTC
Fucking Terrorist Cowards

Did everyone catch the whiney ass that got caught and then cried like a little girl?

He lost his coke buzz.

247 MandyManners  12/02/08 10:09:30 am reply quote

re: #235 Eowyn2

if it hasn't been said:

I propose we call them
FTC
Fucking Terrorist Cowards

Did everyone catch the whiney ass that got caught and then cried like a little girl?

The MFM covering for the FTC.

248 SasquatchOnSteroids  12/02/08 10:09:53 am reply quote

re: #148 Racer X

I'm thinking we need bait. An oil tanker with about 20 Navy Seals aboard. And lots and lots of weapons. As soon as the pirates show up - BLAMMO!

Next.

We could rename them Code Sink

249 Max Darkside  12/02/08 10:10:08 am reply quote

re: #200 Sol Roth

Electronic Karma Slavery: worship the button that feeds your ego.

When Cheeta push button, no banana come out. You good. When you push button Cheeta get banana.

250 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 10:10:14 am reply quote

re: #235 Eowyn2

Did everyone catch the whiney ass that got caught and then cried like a little girl?

He trains like a jihadi
Yes, he does, and
He kills just like a jihadi, yes, and
He tortures like a jihadi
But he cries for mercy like a little girl.

--with apologies to Bob Dylan

251 CIA Reject  12/02/08 10:10:17 am reply quote

re: #230 Iron Fist

Overkill is fun. It keeps the jihadis on their toes, and contributes to the local economy. Like paying taxes, overkill is the new Patriotism.

Can's say as I disagree with ya, but you know- The Economy, budget cuts, and all the rest...

252 Eowyn2  12/02/08 10:10:42 am reply quote

re: #247 MandyManners

The MFM covering for the FTC.

YES

253 Sharmuta  12/02/08 10:10:45 am reply quote

re: #236 Golem Akbar

Free-lance Buccaneers?

I think "privateers" has a good shot of being the term the media will go with- it gives them an opportunity to tie "private" into greedy, eeeeeeeeevil capitalism.

That or maybe Sea Desperados- so they can paint them as desperate, sympathetic figures driven to piracy because of neo-colonialism.

254 Bumr50  12/02/08 10:10:48 am reply quote

re: #232 father_of_10

I'm still taken aback by the number of Republicans that still watch NBC as though it were a viable news organization.
I meet them all the time, and am literally speechless because I don't really know how to enlighten them without revealing my true, unhinged self.
I should work on a compilation of NBC-specific bias to e-mail, and send some links to be explored as an option.

255 Eowyn2  12/02/08 10:12:17 am reply quote

re: #253 Sharmuta

I think "privateers" has a good shot of being the term the media will go with- it gives them an opportunity to tie "private" into greedy, eeeeeeeeevil capitalism.

That or maybe Sea Desperados- so they can paint them as desperate, sympathetic figures driven to piracy because of neo-colonialism.

Freedom of the Seas Fighters?

256 unreconstructed rebel  12/02/08 10:12:54 am reply quote

I remember meeting someone who worked for the World Bank shortly after 9/11. What was remarkable was how totally confused she was. She could not get her head around the fact that these people the bank wanted so desperately to help hated everything the bank stood for.

To quote John Grisham, some folks "just need killin'."

257 CIA Reject  12/02/08 10:15:54 am reply quote

re: #230 Iron Fist

Overkill is fun. It keeps the jihadis on their toes, and contributes to the local economy. Like paying taxes, overkill is the new Patriotism.

Like this snippet from a Gulf War press conference:

Snarky Reporter: "Isn't that like killing flies with a sledge hammer?"

Gen. Tom Kelly: "Personally I think that's a great way to kill flies..."

RIP General...

258 Who Watches the Watchmen?  12/02/08 10:17:05 am reply quote

re: #189 Walter L. Newton

First off, I wasn't being mean or anything, just funnin'.

But, I know what you meant. My sole goal was to drink as cheap and as strong as I could and still wake up sober in the morning. So, a 6 pack of Mickey's and two pints of Southern was my evening snack. Every evening, for almost 20 years.

Mickey's Big Mouths? Worst. Hangover. Ever. (except for maybe Southern Comfort). I felt like I had a railroad spike through my head.

259 Max Darkside  12/02/08 10:17:12 am reply quote

"Moral Socialism", from which comes Moral Equivalency, also is the reason that the perpetrators of crimes are victims too. Since right-from-wrong (RFW) cannot be seen, everyone is lowered to the lowest common denominator, to being a victim. So, in every crime, there are at least two victims, one of which was caused by society (the perp) to misbehave. Since it is society's fault, having society punish him/her is wrong.

Same with pirates... Socialists see them as merely struggling people who must turn to maritime activistism to take their proper share of the riches that each of us deserve.

260 Who Watches the Watchmen?  12/02/08 10:17:51 am reply quote

re: #253 Sharmuta

I think "privateers" has a good shot of being the term the media will go with- it gives them an opportunity to tie "private" into greedy, eeeeeeeeevil capitalism.

That or maybe Sea Desperados- so they can paint them as desperate, sympathetic figures driven to piracy because of neo-colonialism.

"Oil slick" has a nice ring to it too.

261 snailracer  12/02/08 10:18:39 am reply quote

Media Excuses? Surely you jest! To say the media is burying their head in the sand is a gross misunderstatement. These are not excuses - these are blatant omissions, lies, obfuscations, misleading roundabouts and whitewashing blather.

What I really don't get is why they all do this. Since when has reporting the news become this sanitized fairytale shit? Every news story has become an editorialized opinion piece which leans so far to the left that even the tower of Pisa look plumb.

I used to frequent another forum - one that has nothing to do with politics, world events, etc. During the elections they confessed their addiction to CNN, turned out to suffer from severe moonbattery and proceeded to label me narrow-minded.

As an aside - The events in Mumbai were not discussed until day 3 when one of the enlightened ones wrote she had no idea that Mumbai was the 'new' name for Bombay (never mind this name change took place in 1995). Four more came forward to say they did not know that Mumbai used to be Bombay. Sadly enough none of them commented on the situation, the victims or the terrorists. And they called me narrow-minded?

262 ploome hineni  12/02/08 10:18:40 am reply quote

..the media are the enemy

263 CIA Reject  12/02/08 10:19:50 am reply quote

re: #260 Who Watches the Watchmen?

"Oil slick" has a nice ring to it too.

So does "Shark bait"..... or "chum"...

264 ploome hineni  12/02/08 10:21:01 am reply quote

re: #263 CIA Reject

So does "Shark bait"..... or "chum"...

chum is good

265 Iron Fist  12/02/08 10:22:35 am reply quote

re: #257 CIA Reject

One of the things you learn on your path to a Black Belt is to cheat. Do everything possible to stack the deck so totally in your favor that you thoroughly destroy your opponent while it appears to witnesses that you merely brushed him aside.

The beauty is that if you do it right, they won't get over it. Obviously, they frown on this behavior in tournament competition. You are allowed one warning, so kick 'em in the balls as hard as you can right off the line. Then you have to spend the rest of the match chasing them down so you can hit them again :-)

266 right_on_target  12/02/08 10:26:05 am reply quote

The the religionofpeace.com website has an Islamic Terror counter that runs up into thousands.
The Jewish Terror counter is stuck on 1 [Baruch Goldstein], but is replayed thousands of times by the islamists.
To them, that makes it equal.

267 rabidsquirrel  12/02/08 10:27:11 am reply quote

re: #206 Occasional Reader

That's it! We need to unleash terrifying Claymation figures against the Somali pirates.

We're unleashing Ted Kennedy on them?

268 Born_to_lose  12/02/08 10:28:32 am reply quote
So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists? Why did Jon Snow, one of Britain’s most respected TV journalists, use the word “practitioners” when referring to the Mumbai terrorists? Was he perhaps confusing them with doctors?

Why did Britain’s highly regarded Channel 4 News state that the “militants” showed a “wanton disregard for race or creed” when exactly the opposite was true: Targets and victims were very carefully selected. Why did the “experts” invited to discuss the Mumbai attacks in one show on the state-funded Radio France Internationale, the voice of France around the world, harp on about Baruch Goldstein (who carried out the Hebron shootings in 1994), virtually the sole case of a Jewish terrorist in living memory?

These questions are great. It is my hope that the leftist hippies in this country begin to adopt (though I am not holding my breath) the intellectual capacity to ponder and fathom the answers to these very specific questions. But here is why America will not provide the very obvious answers to these questions:

1. Islam will have to reform itself, IMMEDIATELY, and that would include it's willingness to abolish the violent portions of the Koran from Muhammad's time in Medina. This of course will NEVER happen as (inject sarcastic, mocking tone) "the Koran is the word of the Allah via the Prophet!" Sorry, but even the "moderate" muslims who do not recognize these portions (rolls eyes) are not safe from those who live day in and day out for them.

2. This would require Americans to no longer sing in unison with the current Administration the praise that this is a religion of peace, love, and understanding. The truth would HAVE to be revealed about the fact that the doctrine in which this religion, Islam, is based, and it's accompanying governing style, Shariah, is spread only though a justified killing, conquering and/or subjugation, and NOTHING is slowing down the process. Weee!

3. We are going to have to start teaching kids the correct story of the Crusades to better understand the ever fluctuating influence of the Islamic culture, and just how that "influence" is established (see number 2), and then what kind of poverty strikes the land that allowed this violent ideology to take over.

So, in other words, this was not the kind of "Change" that Americans were looking for on November 2nd. THAT is why western media will not, at least in my lifetime (I am 25) answer the above questions - at least not honestly, anyway.

269 debutaunt  12/02/08 10:31:56 am reply quote

re: #34 shanec99

Why call them terrorists?
That is too incomplete a definition.
Call them blood thirsty, murdererous, woman beating and pedophiles who pretend to be religous people.

Religion
of
Practitioners

270 loggiedog  12/02/08 10:34:35 am reply quote

I wrote a letter to Fernanda Santos of the NY Times chiding her for her choice of words.

"It is not known if the Jewish center was strategically chosen, or if it was an accidental hostage scene"

271 Fat Jolly Penguin  12/02/08 10:37:39 am reply quote
Has the New York Times learned anything since the Holocaust, when, even after the war ended in the spring of 1945, the paper infamously refused to report that the Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Germans and so on killed in the camps had been Jews, and killed as Jews?

What the hell?! They actually did that?

272 smokefire  12/02/08 10:39:36 am reply quote

re: #269 debutaunt

Islam is a religion of peace.

If you don't believe me, I will slit your throat.

273 Born_to_lose  12/02/08 10:40:50 am reply quote

re: #270 loggiedog

Um, What the hell is an "accidental hostage scene"? I mean, ok, maybe when criminals get desperate, but um, in her appreantly careless research, she missed the very PUBLIC reports about the extensive mutilation/torture that the Jews who were killed at the centers recieved. There is no denying, at least to the thinking person, that this was NO accident... Fernanda Santos needs to recieve a pink slip - I hope you gave'er hell!

274 buzzsawmonkey  12/02/08 10:51:03 am reply quote

re: #270 loggiedog

I wrote a letter to Fernanda Santos of the NY Times chiding her for her choice of words.

"It is not known if the Jewish center was strategically chosen, or if it was an accidental hostage scene"

"Accidental hostage," with a big Magen David, would make a great T-shirt if I did T-shirts.

275 Guanxi88  12/02/08 10:52:21 am reply quote

re: #274 buzzsawmonkey

"Accidental hostage," with a big Magen David, would make a great T-shirt if I did T-shirts.

Sad thing is, it would be accurate. In all places, and at all times, it seems, we are "accidental hostages." Just being there makes us a target.

276 Age Of Freedom  12/02/08 10:52:24 am reply quote

Spot on article. Hits reality on the head.

277 DisturbedEma  12/02/08 10:57:14 am reply quote

re: #276 Age Of Freedom

Spot on article. Hits reality those who ignore reality on the head.


Fixed ;)

278 DisturbedEma  12/02/08 10:58:00 am reply quote

re: #275 Guanxi88

Sad thing is, it would be accurate. In all places, and at all times, it seems, we are "accidental hostages." Just being there makes us a target.

Mine would say "intentional target" and have a Magen David in a bullseye. . .

279 Cognito  12/02/08 11:03:31 am reply quote

I agree with the Wall Street Journal.

(And to my fan club: That is sad, guys. Truly.)

280 Guanxi88  12/02/08 11:04:31 am reply quote

re: #278 DisturbedEma

Mine would say "intentional target" and have a Magen David in a bullseye. . .

True enough; we are targeted, and yet, it seems as if when we are murdered, it just sort of happens, at least, that's what the news reports make it look like.

A bus just sort of blows up, women and children are ripped to pieces, as if by some sort of force of nature.

What, an identifiably Jewish target in INDIA, for cryin' out loud, gets shot up, its residents massacred, and it was just some sort of freak event. Like the jihadists had meant to do dawah or something, you know, struggling to overcome their own shortcomings, and somehow they end up with automatic weapons and grenades at a Chabad House. Seems to be absolutely mystifying to some folk.

But to go back to it, yes, we're intentional targets, but our deaths are treated as accidental, or deserved.

281 jwpaine  12/02/08 11:06:48 am reply quote

re: #154 Nevergiveup

Then why don't I get payed better?

You're making the wrong sort of booty calls.

282 loggiedog  12/02/08 11:15:43 am reply quote

re: #273 Born_to_lose

Actually I asked her if her editor would have let the sentence passed if it looked like this

"It is not known if the Taj Mahal Hotel was strategically chosen, or if it was an accidental hostage scene." I said it was disgraceful because the Rabbi and his wife were killed, along with the other occupants of the center, because they were Jewish. I also asked for an apology for the victim's sake.

283 Mr Spiffy  12/02/08 11:17:13 am reply quote

re: #83 Bumr50

Here in Pittsburgh, the word "pirate" strikes fear in exactly 0 people:) blockquote>

Nor in the rest of the National League

(Where are Willie Stargell and Dave Parker when you need them?)

284 RickJ  12/02/08 11:19:01 am reply quote

I wonder how much the word "terrorist" is becoming a badge of honor to these guys -

Don't they pretty much want to terrorize the "infidels" ?

Maybe we need a label that further degrades their humanity and intelligence.

285 golly_wog  12/02/08 11:20:50 am reply quote

Disgruntled fishmongers on the restive ocean.

286 mcmeador  12/02/08 11:22:28 am reply quote

So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists?

Come on...we all know the answer to this. If they were Muslims, then they can't be terrorists. There's no such thing as Islamic terror. And if they were terrorists, then they can't be Muslims. There's no such thing as Islamic terror. So apparently the media has chosen to identify them as Muslims, thus they cannot call them terrorists. They're just poor mistreated Arabs concerned about their religion.

Why did Britain’s highly regarded Channel 4 News state that the “militants” showed a “wanton disregard for race or creed” when exactly the opposite was true: Targets and victims were very carefully selected.

The answer to this is simple, too. Only Caucasians are capable of racism and anti-religious sentiment.

287 mattm  12/02/08 11:33:05 am reply quote

I', sure this is all a big misunderstanding and the persons responsible never met for it to happen this way.

/MSM off

288 redc1c4  12/02/08 11:33:14 am reply quote

re: #152 Sharmuta

See- that's where I think that will go. How long until these aren't pirates, but instead sympathetic figures driven by hard poverty to take on a ruthless job so they can feed their ten kids at home. *sniff*

/It's coming. You heard it here first.

something along those lines was posted the other day on a british news site:
the person claimed that the priates were former fishermen whose livelyhoods had been destroyed by EU commercial fishing, so who could balme them for seizing the oil tanker.....

/someone linked it here

289 Mr Spiffy  12/02/08 11:36:09 am reply quote

re: #203 Joo-LiZ

media blackout = whitewash

290 mikalm  12/02/08 11:44:01 am reply quote

re: #156 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Shit scraps Ted Rall off its shoes.

I heard Ted Rall had an a**hole transplant -- and the a**hole rejected him!

291 ellem  12/02/08 11:44:11 am reply quote

I read this this morning on my BB and was literally yelling at my phone.

I sent it to every sane person I know and the ones that voted for Obama too.

292 dhg4  12/02/08 11:59:02 am reply quote

Bret Stephens made a related point. It's not just the media, too often, fails to call terrorists "terrorists," they too often parrot the terrorists' excuses providing justification for terror instead of treating the claims of terrorists with the skepticism they deserve.

293 MJBrutus  12/02/08 12:10:24 pm reply quote

re: #35 TaeJohnDo

Dennis Miller said some time ago it may well take a democrat president to do something nasty aganst terrorists to bring congress, media etc on board to fight the war on terro -- that only a dem could get away with doing what really needs to be done to fight a winning war against them.

I do not think the o is the one to do this, but I'm afraid he had a point.

As in only Nixon could go to China?

294 firedupengineer  12/02/08 12:11:02 pm reply quote

If there are attacks on Westerners 'after' The One takes office - THEN they will be called "terrorists"...

295 MJBrutus  12/02/08 12:12:20 pm reply quote

I would love to know how the Indian government is treating the "detainee" that they have in custody. It would be very comforting to know that they are giving him due process and respecting his rights under the Geneva convention and not abusing their power by "torturing" him on a water board or something.

/sarc

296 Yashmak  12/02/08 12:24:32 pm reply quote

C'mon guys, you all know they were just heavily armed tourists, who lost their tempers after being stuck in line too long.

297 Marlin925  12/02/08 12:40:20 pm reply quote

Has the acusatory columnist Turd Randall been to Afghanistan? Has he ever embedded with a Special Forces ODA or conventional unit in the 'Ghan?

The weding party incident was early in the war & yet he bloviates about it still. I suppose he'd poop his drawers if he did a little reseach about green U.S. troops accidentaly lighting up civillians in WW II. Effed up stuff happens in war, not all that goes wrong can be pinned on "Dubya". For the record, am anything but a "Dubya" fan.

"We know why George W. Bush never tried to catch Osama bin Laden; he must have been worried he'd be captured alive and talk about his relationship with the CIA."

Interesting atomic leap in logic, Pres. Carter (D) initiated support of the Mujahedin in Afghanistan. Charley Wilson (D) was the big wheel in that operation.

298 Marlin925  12/02/08 12:43:43 pm reply quote

Oops, got his name wrong, Turd Rall

299 Ron Shaw  12/02/08 12:45:56 pm reply quote

Seriously unfortunate, but a salmon is a salmon is a...salmon and I see the conservative media at least in America swimming upstream in the same waters as the MSM. The conservative bunch have matured and they are all, after all, salmon headed for a shared location to procreate purely by instinct. The waters strong flow may be against them all, but they will swim on, side-by-side ultimately.

300 Brian Smaller  12/02/08 1:01:23 pm reply quote

" Why did Jon Snow, one of Britain’s most respected TV journalists, use the word “practitioners” when referring to the Mumbai terrorists? Was he perhaps confusing them with doctors?"

well - given the events at Glasgow Airport an easy mistake to make.

301 Paul  12/02/08 1:42:18 pm reply quote

As long as the MSM doesn't call them "terrorists" then their murderous actions are not terrorism. So they're called "militants", "separatists", "gunmen" or "practitioners"; much less judgmental than "terrorists"---such a Islamophobic word.

Yeah, "practitioners" just like doctors, I think Josef Mengele was a practitioner too.

302 Brees  12/02/08 1:46:32 pm reply quote

Pffft. The lib media in Europe doesn't want to offend the cells already in their own countries. Desperately trying to avoid any new attacks on their own soil.

Peace & love.

All is well, now that our elect is prez!

303 steve  12/02/08 1:56:39 pm reply quote

It amazes me that the leftist media can say so much with sand in their mouths and still be understood. Or not understood?

304 Smilla  12/02/08 2:15:13 pm reply quote

Thank you for posting Tom Gross's article, Charles. I read the full text. I don't know what these journalists think they are doing but it is definitely not journalism.

Cowards.

305 johnb  12/02/08 3:37:55 pm reply quote

I don't know where you got the idea that Channel 4 news is well respected! Practically the whole British media is left leaning and will not criticize Islamic terrorism.

306 Smilla  12/02/08 3:47:33 pm reply quote

re: #305 johnb

As Melanie Phillips in her blog at The Spectator knows - and regularly shows - only too well.

307 uptight  12/02/08 5:17:09 pm reply quote

Someone should try try telling leftist mediabots that all of their euphemisms for terrorism actually relate to the way these people practice Islam. They've been using these words so long, I think they've lost sight of that.

In fact "terrorist" is one of the most neutral words they could use, if they wanted to avoid offending Muslims.

Let me explain, when a journalist using the "militant" he isn't drawing comparisons with other "less angry" forms of terrorism! He means "a person motivated to anger". In the case of the Mumbai terrorists, Hamas & Al Qaeda, the motivation is the terrorists religious views. The journalist is effectively blaming Islam for the attacks.

When a journalist uses "radical" he means to say that the terrorist is "a person who holds a radical view of Islam".

When a journalist uses "extremist", he means to say that the terrorist is "a person who holds an extreme view of Islam".

The word "fundamentalist" may seem polite to the journalist, but what he's actually saying is "this nutcase is a nutcase because he is practising the fundamentals of Islam".

So, when a journalist calls a terrorist a "militant", "radical", "extremist" or "fundamentalist", he might as well say that "Abu Psychopath" is an "Islamic Enthusiast" or more accurately an "Islamic Purist".

Most journalists are too simple or formulaic to realise this. When pressed, they say the word "terrorist" is "too vague".

They sometimes prefer the terms "gunman" or "bomber" - as if these were somehow more focussed than "terrorist". However, "gunman" and "bomber" merely describe the implements used to kill, rather than why they killed.

A "gunman" could be anyone from a bankrobber to a participant in the Olympics. A bomber can refer to an aircraft. A terrorist is a terrorist. You know what they are and what they do.

Some journalists will use the phrase "act of terror", but won't use "terrorist" because it is "too judgemental" (especially when Jews are being killed). They don't want to back one side or the other. However, "terrorist" is the accurate term for someone committing "an act of terror" as surely a Buddhist os someone who practices Buddhism.

Also, why be afraid if being judgemental about the killing of civilians? Because Islam is a fashionable "victim" for the left.

I tell you this, fellow lizardoids, we are but a few steps away from seeing journalists refer to "serial killers" as "homicide distributors" or use the term "differently sexualized" for paedophiles.

It's a sick world where somehow thinks basic morality compromises their professional integrity.

308 sillyallah  12/02/08 5:20:12 pm reply quote

Thank you for posting this article. Somebody had to say it.

I asked a similar question in the ThinkProgress report on the Mumbai massacre, and got the expected response from that group. In fact, you can't even see one of my comments for "moderation" reasons, although it is just a bunch of verbiage from the Quran and Hadith (yet they show a huge number of personal insults from other users and even one comment who claimed Zionist treachery was responsible).

I simply don't understand how people can cover their ears and eyes in light of the obvious. The Islamic source of this terrorist attack needs to be acknowledged.

309 uptight  12/02/08 5:22:14 pm reply quote

Someone should try telling leftist mediabots that all of their euphemisms for terrorism actually relate to the way these people practice Islam. They've been using these words so long, I think they've lost sight of that.

In fact "terrorist" is one of the most neutral words they could use, if they wanted to avoid offending Muslims.

Let me explain, when a journalist uses the word "militant" he isn't drawing comparisons with other "less angry" forms of terrorism. He means "a person motivated to anger". In the case of the Mumbai terrorists, Hamas & Al Qaeda, the motivation is the terrorists religious views. The journalist is effectively blaming Islam for the attacks.

When a journalist uses "radical" he means to say that the terrorist is "a person who holds a radical view of Islam".

When a journalist uses "extremist", he means to say that the terrorist is "a person who holds an extreme view of Islam".

The word "fundamentalist" may seem polite to the journalist, but what he's actually saying is "this nutcase is a nutcase because he is practising the fundamentals of Islam".

So, when a journalist calls a terrorist a "militant", "radical", "extremist" or "fundamentalist", he might as well say that "Abu Psychopath" is an "Islamic Enthusiast" or more accurately an "Islamic Purist".

Most journalists are too simple or formulaic to realise this. When pressed, they say the word "terrorist" is "too vague".

They sometimes prefer the terms "gunman" or "bomber" - as if these were somehow more focussed than "terrorist". However, "gunman" and "bomber" merely describe the implements used to kill, rather than why they killed.

A "gunman" could be anyone from a bankrobber to a participant in the Olympics. A bomber can refer to an aircraft. A terrorist is a terrorist. You know what they are and what they do.

Some journalists will use the phrase "act of terror", but won't use "terrorist" because it is "too judgemental" (especially when Jews are being killed). They don't want to back one side or the other. However, "terrorist" is the accurate term for someone committing "an act of terror" as surely a Buddhist is someone who practices Buddhism.

Also, why be afraid if being judgemental about the killing of civilians? Because Islam is a fashionable "victim" for the left.

I tell you this, fellow lizardoids, we are but a few steps away from seeing journalists refer to "serial killers" as "homicide distributors" or use the term "differently sexualized" for paedophiles.

It's a sick world where somehow thinks basic morality compromises their professional integrity.

310 uptight  12/02/08 5:24:42 pm reply quote

yeesh - sorry about the typos and double post

311 uptight  12/02/08 5:40:53 pm reply quote

Al Reuters explain their policy:

The best explanation of our policy is the guidance we give to our journalists in the Reuters handbook. All Reuters reporters, whatever their nationality, personal beliefs or politics, abide by these guidelines.

Here they are:

Terrorism We may refer without attribution to terrorism and counter-terrorism in general but do not refer to specific events as terrorism. Nor do we use the word terrorist without attribution to qualify specific individuals, groups or events. Terrorism and terrorist must be retained when quoting someone in direct speech. When quoting someone in indirect speech, care must be taken with sentence structure to ensure it is entirely clear that they are the sources words and not a Reuters label. Terrorism and terrorist should not be used as single words in inverted commas (e.g. terrorist) or preceded by so-called (e.g. a so-called terrorist attack) since that can be taken to imply that Reuters is making a value judgment. Use a fuller quote if necessary. Terror as in terror attack or terror cell should be avoided on stylistic grounds.

This is part of a wider and long-standing policy of avoiding the use of emotive terms. Reuters does not label or characterise the subjects of news stories. We aim to report objectively their actions, identity and background. We aim for a dispassionate use of language so that individuals, organisations and governments can make their own judgment on the basis of facts. Seek to use more specific terms like “bomber”, or “bombing”, hijacker or hijacking, “attacker” or “attacks”, “gunman” or “gunmen” etc. It is particularly important not to make unattributed use of the words terrorism and terrorist in national and territorial conflicts and to avoid using those terms in indirect speech in such a context.

312 drj  12/02/08 8:45:30 pm reply quote

Ha - I noticed in the daily breeze and actually posted a comment concerning this very topic.

I didn't realize this was wide spread - but it doesn't surprise me.

Perhaps they are not terrorist - maybe they are just misunderstood creatures that the Obama administration will learn to understand and heal, then bring hope and change? (sarcasm intended)

313 Joan  12/02/08 10:36:52 pm reply quote

re: #44 Russkilitlover

It's not so much that the media is "burying its head in the sand," it's more disturbing than that; they are deliberately misleading and redirecting facts, reports, eye witness accounts and even the testimony of a terrorist.

They are propagating a narrative, an alternate reality. What does not fit the narrative is discounted, minimized, ignored.

True believers, oh yes all of them. Propaganda hacks, some of them. Propaganda virtuosos--far too many of them, especially in the arts. Arts and entertainment are constituents of the media, because they propagate the alternate reality.

314 Joan  12/02/08 10:43:09 pm reply quote

re: #302 Brees

Pffft. The lib media in Europe doesn't want to offend the cells already in their own countries. Desperately trying to avoid any new attacks on their own soil.

Peace & love.

All is well, now that our elect is prez!

They will fall without a shot fired.

315 EE  12/03/08 7:34:50 pm reply quote

The lying-by-omission is done to cover up two connections: (1) the connection of the deed to the deliberate targeting of bystanders -- that is, to terrorism; and (2) the connection of the cause to jihad -- the perpetrators viewed themselves as jihadis, and the majority of the Muslim public around the world will view them as jihadis, and they will be honored as jihadis.

The lying journalists can call them anything they like, but if they cover up the connection to terrorism and to jihad, then they are liars -- double-liars, in fact, for their double cover-up.

The jihaditerrorists are doing their evil work for all to see. And the coverup journalists use their smoke and mirrors to try to deceive the public into not noticing what is happening, or not having it register in people's minds what is happening, or just being anesthetized into a trancelike state of not seeing and not understanding.

316 Mosse  12/03/08 10:53:46 pm reply quote

"Unfortunately in recent years we have become used to leftist media burying their heads in the sand about the threat that Islamic fundamentalism poses, in much the same way as they once refused to report accurately on communist atrocities..."

They aren't burying their heads, at all. Their agenda is to deliberately obfuscate the nature of the threat and the targets of the jihad. I'm reading "Brother Tariq: The Doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan" by Caroline Fourest. I highly recommend it -- the dissembling and ambiguity we see in the descriptions of the Mumbai massacre are right out of the Muslim Brotherhood playbook. These people know how skewed their presentation is -- there's a purpose to it and they're on board.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register (closed) Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

► Blogs

The past is dust.