Video: Investigating Evolution

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Science • Sat Dec 6, 2008 at 6:28 pm PST • Views: 242

Here’s an interesting discussion between Rev. Alan Jones of San Francisco’s Grace Cathedral and Kevin Padian, UC Berkeley professor and curator of the Museum of Paleontology, on evolution, creationism, science and faith.

" target="_blank">Fora.tv Video ” target=”_blank”>fora.tv…]
Advertisement

1104 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 poopeedoo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:29:55pm

Oh good, a fresh thread. Straighten up and fly right, lizards. :)

2 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:29:58pm

I'm in firefox, and I'm not seeing the video.

3 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:30:12pm

and so we begin again

4 Shug  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:30:19pm

I'm not getting it. Either work firewall or work computer without the required video player is my suspicion.
bummer

5 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:30:50pm

Reload and it will be there.

6 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:30:52pm

re: #2 Sharmuta

I'm in firefox, and I'm not seeing the video.

Switch over to safari. I did, and love it.

7 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:31:40pm

Why is he wearing a mop?

8 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:32:03pm

re: #1 poopeedoo

Oh good, a fresh thread. Straighten up and fly right, lizards. :)

Not much chance of that on one these threads. Before long, bitterclinger_in_PA and his ilk will show to turn this thread into yet another flame fest.

9 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:32:31pm

Apparently, Fora.tv only allows 15 minutes worth of embedded video, so if you want to see the whole thing, click the link that says "Watch full program."

10 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:32:35pm

Evil-ution.

11 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:32:46pm

re: #5 Charles

Thanks!

re: #6 reine.de.tout

Switch over to safari. I did, and love it.

I normally am in Safari.

12 Shug  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:33:00pm

got it. thanks

13 jim in virginia  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:37:41pm

but, but, faith and science can'y co exist...
/sarc off

14 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:39:26pm

Dude's got serious hair.

15 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:39:58pm

re: #7 swamprat

Why is he wearing a mop?

The "odd male" hypothesis?

(obscure evolutionary biology joke)

16 Shug  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:40:05pm

You have to be pretty smart and talented to get away with that hair.

17 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:40:07pm

I think something is evolving in his hair as he speaks.

18 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:40:11pm

I'm getting no audio.

19 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:40:52pm

re: #2 Sharmuta

I'm in firefox, and I'm not seeing the video.

Working fine with my firefox.

20 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:40:54pm

For a moment, I thought that was Tom Baker.

21 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:41:50pm

He should grow a bushy beard. He'd look like a nose and two eyes on a Q-tip.

22 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:42:07pm

So will there be a fifteen minute intermission while we listen to this?

Come on, two deeply divided groups? What happened to the freedom of religion and that means not in the classroom but in the church thank you very much?

How is this really
REALLY
any controversy or debate?

The obvious data totally overwhelms any debate here...

Oh geez, they really are trying to debate it.

Sorry, I have such a hard time with people who vehemently keep blinders on about the truth, the data, the facts of discovery to the big picture unfolding around us.

I am so refreshed when I hear people of faith that embrace the reality and realize that it is such a beautiful and awesome big picture, that to learn more is to allow us to 'evolve' in such multidimensional ways...

Reminds me of the World is Flat people.

23 rwmofo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:42:35pm

That guy must not have any mirrors in his house.

24 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:42:45pm

He sure is saying all the right things so far.

25 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:43:22pm

re: #23 rwmofo

That guy must not have any mirrors in his house.

Mirrors are covered in hair.

26 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:43:34pm

Nice lid dude.

/jealous

27 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:44:09pm

re: #21 HelloDare

He should grow a bushy beard. He'd look like a nose and two eyes on a Q-tip.

re: #14 SurferDoc

Dude's got serious hair.

re: #7 swamprat

Why is he wearing a mop?

His hair... q-tip...HAHAHAHAHAHAAA

28 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:44:39pm

re: #22 Right mind left

looks flat to me.

Sorry could not resist that.

29 VegasRick  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:45:15pm

Sorry to go OT but I must run here shortly and just received a joke that I know some of you guys will like

A rabbi was opening his mail one morning. Taking a single sheet
of paper from an envelope he found written on it only one word:
'shmuck.' At the next Friday night service, the Rabbi > announced, 'I
have known many people who have written letters and forgot to sign
their names, but this week I received a letter from someone who
signed his name...and forgot to write a letter.'

30 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:45:49pm

Like to see him on a panel with Geert Wilders. Couldn't get them in close proximity, though. They'd lock up like two pieced of Velcro.

31 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:46:40pm

re: #20 Syrah

For a moment, I thought that was Tom Baker.

Who? That's right!

32 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:47:13pm

re: #29 VegasRick

Sorry to go OT but I must run here shortly and just received a joke that I know some of you guys will like

A rabbi was opening his mail one morning. Taking a single sheet
of paper from an envelope he found written on it only one word:
'shmuck.' At the next Friday night service, the Rabbi > announced, 'I
have known many people who have written letters and forgot to sign
their names, but this week I received a letter from someone who
signed his name...and forgot to write a letter.'

[smiles]

33 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:47:29pm

re: #15 Dar ul Harb

Really obscure.

Here's about the only Google link I found explaining it.

[Basically, it's a phenomenon of sexual selection in which females choose to mate with males which exhibit unusual characteristics, presumably because if the unusual characteristic is tied to a beneficial mutation, her offspring would be able to outcompete those of females who mated with ordinary males.]

34 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:47:39pm

re: #28 Steve

looks flat to me.

Sorry could not resist that.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAAA

Look at all those swirly motions all over, how did they paint that on!?!/

35 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:47:40pm

I like this guy. Beside what he's saying, he has a nice way of speaking.

Thanks Charles.

36 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:48:01pm

re: #31 Kenneth

Who? That's right!

And what's on second?

37 rwmofo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:48:10pm

re: #28 Steve

looks flat to me.

Sorry could not resist that.

Flat like a pizza.

Mmmm. Pizza.

38 Jim in Virginia  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:48:30pm

re: #33 Dar ul Harb Explains why my wife married me...

39 VegasRick  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:48:31pm

re: #32 Dark_Falcon

[smiles]

Thought you might like that, funny and quick witted Rabbi that be.

40 yah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:48:58pm

Looks like Padian is evolving into Santa Clause.

41 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:49:30pm

So far this makes lots of sense and is easy to follow.

Nice to see a religious man and a scientist agreeing on evolution.

42 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:50:07pm

re: #40 yah

Looks like Padian is evolving into Santa Clause.

?

43 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:50:13pm

re: #33 Dar ul Harb

It's also is a proxy for outbreeding, which tends to produce "hybrid vigor".

44 yah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:50:53pm

re: #42 Dark_Falcon

the hair

45 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:51:54pm
46 jcm  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:52:05pm

re: #37 rwmofo

Flat like a pizza.

Mmmm. Pizza.

Pizza... and beer...
Beer is proof God want's us to be happy.

What more proof in God do you need?

47 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:52:06pm

44 posts and no trolls or meltdowns. Can I get a refund?

///

48 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:52:10pm

That's what we need, more manichean tension in a debate on science :)

49 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:52:27pm

OK, Jones just earned a down-ding from me. Saying "Marxism is a very useful tool for analyzing things". I can't call it useful for very much at all, save causing misery.

50 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:52:44pm

re: #47 CynicalConservative

44 posts and no trolls or meltdowns. Can I get a refund?

///

It's the hair rays.

51 Shug  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:53:05pm

re: #49 Dark_Falcon

OK, Jones just earned a down-ding from me. Saying "Marxism is a very useful tool for analyzing things". I can't call it useful for very much at all, save causing misery.

He was trying to sound clever.
I felt the same way after he said that

52 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:53:11pm

While I'm waiting for the full video to load I'll share this image:

Dubai

53 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:53:17pm

re: #37 rwmofo

Flat like a pizza.

Mmmm. Pizza.

And he keeps saying "flatly" which keeps me in stitches and I have to rewind to pick up what he is really saying.

I do like this guy. He neatly connects the science with the religion in ways essential to our own evolution in education and research.

Science is all based on the data, that it leads us in such amazing directions.

54 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:53:30pm

re: #38 Jim in Virginia

Explains why my wife married me...

Yes, it does provide hope for us all... ;)

55 yah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:53:34pm

There was a test one time where they took equal amounts of ordainary men and convicts dressed up like normal guys.
They put them in a social setting with a bunch of women. The women were attracted to the convicts ovewhelmingly.

56 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:54:14pm

re: #53 Right mind left

And he keeps saying "flatly" which keeps me in stitches and I have to rewind to pick up what he is really saying.

I do like this guy. He neatly connects the science with the religion in ways essential to our own evolution in education and research.

Science is all based on the data, that it leads us in such amazing directions.

Except for global warming fear mongering mate!

57 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:55:04pm

re: #47 CynicalConservative

44 posts and no trolls or meltdowns. Can I get a refund?

///

This guy might reach them! He is a very simplistic and connected speaker tying the connections for the most basic of that cross section of the 50% he refers to.

58 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:55:24pm

re: #34 Right mind left

HAHAHAHAHAHHAAA

Look at all those swirly motions all over, how did they paint that on!?!/

It is amazing what you can do with air brushes.

Actually I met a flat earther on the beach one day and asked him to explain the curvature. He just walked away.

59 jcm  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:55:43pm

re: #47 CynicalConservative

44 posts and no trolls or meltdowns. Can I get a refund?

///

Damn it all! I can't take it any more. Being civil and all that, reasonable, measured. I HAVE HAD enough!

Every one is wrong, and unless Charles posts more I'll, I'll, I'll start LGF3 and expose all of you!

IT'S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN!

/ happy now?

60 rwmofo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:55:45pm

re: #55 yah

There was a test one time where they took equal amounts of ordainary men and convicts dressed up like normal guys.
They put them in a social setting with a bunch of women. The women were attracted to the convicts ovewhelmingly.

The convicts probably looked like linebackers.

61 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:55:55pm

re: #55 yah

There was a test one time where they took equal amounts of ordainary men and convicts dressed up like normal guys.
They put them in a social setting with a bunch of women. The women were attracted to the convicts ovewhelmingly.

No surprise there. The convicts were really interested in the women.

62 nyc redneck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:56:00pm

re: #7 swamprat

Why is he wearing a mop?

LOL,
i like the guy a lot but the whole time i'm watching, i'm thinking i would really like to trim his hair.
at least the bangs.

63 Shug  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:56:22pm

The Big Bangs theory

64 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:56:32pm

re: #48 Thanos

That's what we need, more manichean tension in a debate on science :)

I didn't come from no manichean!

65 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:56:42pm

re: #51 Shug

He was trying to sound clever.
I felt the same way after he said that

It important to remember that this talk is taking place in the Bay Area. These two are quite sane, but they live in a very moonbatty environment. They probably say some dumb lefty things just to fit in.

66 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:56:50pm

re: #49 Dark_Falcon

OK, Jones just earned a down-ding from me. Saying "Marxism is a very useful tool for analyzing things". I can't call it useful for very much at all, save causing misery.

Gotta agree there. Marxist analysis is way overused.

Marxist analysis is the reason the "enlightened" keep insisting Islamic terrorism is rooted in poverty and oppression. Everything in Marxism analysis is rooted in the class struggle -- and everything else is the "false conscious".

67 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:56:57pm

re: #55 yah


That's because the convicts hadn't seen a woman in months and were positively oozing phermones.

68 VegasRick  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:57:01pm

re: #63 Shug

The Big Bangs theory

Hair we go!

69 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:57:24pm

re: #60 rwmofo

The convicts probably looked like linebackers.

Nah, it was probably because the cons had much more interesting personalities than the ordinary dweebs selected as placebebos.

70 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:58:00pm

re: #59 jcm

Damn it all! I can't take it any more. Being civil and all that, reasonable, measured. I HAVE HAD enough!

Every one is wrong, and unless Charles posts more I'll, I'll, I'll start LGF3 and expose all of you!

IT'S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN!

/ happy now?

Thank you! I am now satisfied that all is well in the world.

//(minus the whole obambi thing)

71 nyc redneck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:58:53pm

btw that was a dust mop.
not a wet mop.

72 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:59:31pm

re: #70 CynicalConservative

Thank you! I am now satisfied that all is well in the world.

//(minus the whole obambi thing)

Sounds awfully cynical to me ... oh sorry just noticed the nic

/

73 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 6:59:59pm

Dude stole Don Imus' hair.

74 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:00:37pm

re: #64 Charles

I didn't come from no manichean!

Looking at the modern definition is interesting:

an adherent of the dualistic religious system of Manes, a combination of Gnostic Christianity, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, and various other elements, with a basic doctrine of a conflict between light and dark, matter being regarded as dark and evil.

it fits with the DI mantra: Materialism=bad!

75 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:00:59pm

re: #72 saberry0530

Sounds awfully cynical to me ... oh sorry just noticed the nic

/

I resemble that remark.

76 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:01:15pm

re: #56 LoFlyer

Except for global warming fear mongering mate!


Global warming is a "skewing" of the data...

keep the fear mongering at full height to maintain control on the voting public...but the science will win if they keep pursuing the data and putting it together. If it rules politics we might be in for hardships in the short term.

Science doesn't tell him what he wants to know? re: #58 Steve

It is amazing what you can do with air brushes.

Actually I met a flat earther on the beach one day and asked him to explain the curvature. He just walked away.

IT SHUTS THEM DOWN. Doesn't fit the mold, must throw it away...can't listen...can't open my eyes...

77 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:01:48pm

Interesting.

(paraphrasing)
There is no "truth" in science; there is no "belief" in science. There just "is" science. Results are constantly changing.

78 itellu3times  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:02:06pm

Five minutes in and I'm bored, where's Yoda?

79 Shug  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:02:16pm

the data are the data

80 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:02:20pm

Aw come on folks. He probably has a poodle wrapped around his head.
Poodle

Where is the PETA outcry over this guy?

81 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:02:48pm

Now that's just odd.

First Google hit for "Don Imus" (without the quotes) is this:

Stock Quotes for DON, IMUS

DON (WisdomTree MidCap Dividend Fund (ETF)) - IMUS (Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index)

82 notutopia  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:03:07pm

re: #49 Dark_Falcon

Ah, but it IS useful to analyzing. Specifically in science theories are teseted based on properties of differences and similarities and gradients of Fascism, philosophy and political science.
I liked his distinction between the ideology of Marxism and Marxism being a science.
I think it was the real crux of the debate...

83 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:03:29pm

re: #78 itellu3times

Five minutes in and I'm bored, where's Yoda?

Where's Cog or JMV or bitterclinger...

84 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:04:32pm
85 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:04:44pm

Apparently the IMUS is doing about as bad as the infidel market.

86 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:05:04pm

re: #84 Iron Fist

We are so fucked.

And that's putting it mildly...

87 SlartyBartfast  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:05:34pm

I haven't yet weighed in on a "creation thread" but (for what it's worth) here's some food for thought...

Personally, I think creationists are missing the whole point--the theological punchline--of the whole biblical account. It's entirely possible, even likely, that the writer of Genesis is taking aim at the pagan religions that surrounded Israel at the time the book was written...

"Oh, you worship the sun? Heh. My God created that."

"What? You worship a sacred cow (or lizard)? My God created that."

"Your god was the offspring of two other gods? My God was in the beginning."

To judge Genesis 1 by scientific standards is like judging the preamble of the U.S. constitution as poetry! If God set out to give us some scientific information, why not give us some really good info?

"Hey, people, light travels at the same speed regardless of the relative velocity of the observer..."

Do we spend a lot of time arguing whether there really was a "good Samaritan?" In truth, "the good Samaritan" is a very real parable and we don't worry about the reality of his actual existence. The creation account should be treated the same way.

Check out M. Conrad Hyers' book The Meaning of Creation...an in-depth study of the fallacy of treating theological writing as science.

88 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:06:17pm

Religion is arational. If it were rational there would be no need for faith.

AGW is irrational and often mendacious.

89 VegasRick  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:07:04pm

See ya all later

90 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:07:12pm

Firetruck and ambulance next door. Just got home from work. Thought they were at MY house. Please allow me to introduce you to the cow I just had.

91 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:07:22pm

re: #89 VegasRick

Later Rick!

92 VegasRick  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:07:37pm

re: #91 saberry0530

Later Rick!

See ya!

93 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:08:12pm

Thirty-one minutes in and I'm starting to like his hair.

94 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:08:21pm

re: #90 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Firetruck and ambulance next door. Just got home from work. Thought they were at MY house. Please allow me to introduce you to the cow I just had.

Definitely a pucker moment, hope everything's OK for them and glad it's not you and yours.

95 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:09:17pm

"There's a polemic going on as well..."

"No... the problem is we don't teach philosophy"

interesting discussion here, I have to disagree a bit with the "No", there are some over the top secular humanists who are rabidly anti-faith and who do shield themselves in science. In the end that's a blow to science as well.

96 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:09:43pm
97 rwmofo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:10:59pm

AMF!

98 itellu3times  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:11:23pm

re: #96 Iron Fist

I'd have shit gold bricks if I opened my front door and there was a cop with a shotgun in his hands.

Well dang, let's do some of that, I'll split the proceeds with you, and buy a dozen tickets to the policeman's ball.

99 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:11:49pm

re: #94 CynicalConservative

Very nice people. I'd go next door to see if I could help. But, I hate people who do that, so I won't. I'll go by tomorrow.

Several years ago, I had a neighbor fall and break his leg, walked out and saw him sitting next to his mower, having a smoke. Asked me to call 911 (was a tough old salt, he was), firetruck got there first.

I said, "What the hell? He ain't on fire!"

Why do they send firetrucks? Anybody know.

100 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:13:26pm

re: #94 CynicalConservative

re: #90 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Firetruck and ambulance next door. Just got home from work. Thought they were at MY house. Please allow me to introduce you to the cow I just had.

I received a call from 911 one day asking if my wife was okay cause a firetruck ;and ambulance were dispatched to my house. After about a tense 15 minutes I received a call from a close friend who told me that my 6 month old daughter had rolled over her car seat and down one step while my wife was locking and closing the door.


I am glad to hear that Fat Bastard Vegetarian and his are okay

101 Joan  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:13:59pm

re: #88 HelloDare

Religion is arational. If it were rational there would be no need for faith.

AGW is irrational and often mendacious.

Well, I can understand your desire to take potshot at AGW...Hmmm. Aquinas, anyone?
[Link: www.jcu.edu...]

102 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:14:16pm

re: #99 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Very nice people. I'd go next door to see if I could help. But, I hate people who do that, so I won't. I'll go by tomorrow.

Several years ago, I had a neighbor fall and break his leg, walked out and saw him sitting next to his mower, having a smoke. Asked me to call 911 (was a tough old salt, he was), firetruck got there first.

I said, "What the hell? He ain't on fire!"

Why do they send firetrucks? Anybody know.

In case they spontaneously combust.

103 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:14:24pm

re: #99 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Very nice people. I'd go next door to see if I could help. But, I hate people who do that, so I won't. I'll go by tomorrow.

Several years ago, I had a neighbor fall and break his leg, walked out and saw him sitting next to his mower, having a smoke. Asked me to call 911 (was a tough old salt, he was), firetruck got there first.

I said, "What the hell? He ain't on fire!"

Why do they send firetrucks? Anybody know.

I'm the same way, I am inclined to offer help but don't want to intrude. Not sure what the deal is with the firetrucks, best I can offer is the most available equipment for a wide range of situations. That's one tough old salt indeed.

104 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:14:35pm

re: #99 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

105 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:14:40pm

"A duck's head is not going to suddenly pop up on a trout".

Whew!

106 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:15:34pm

re: #100 Steve

re: #90 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I received a call from 911 one day asking if my wife was okay cause a firetruck ;and ambulance were dispatched to my house. After about a tense 15 minutes I received a call from a close friend who told me that my 6 month old daughter had rolled over her car seat and down one step while my wife was locking and closing the door.


I am glad to hear that Fat Bastard Vegetarian and his are okay

That might just have given me a heart attack.

107 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:15:58pm

re: #104 chippy

Man of few words?

108 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:16:10pm

re: #104 chippy

what happened to it?

i wrote "usually they are trained as paramedics"

109 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:16:41pm

Why do they send firetrucks? Anybody know.

usually need more then 2 people to respond.

cardiac needs at least 4.

110 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:16:45pm

new to this stuff - typing and all...
/

111 Basho  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:16:47pm

re: #105 Racer X

"A duck's head is not going to suddenly pop up on a trout".

Whew!

Hmm... not yet, at least.

TO THE LAB!

112 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:17:28pm

re: #110 chippy

new to this stuff - typing and all...
/

S'all good, we won't razz you too much.

113 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:17:43pm

re: #90 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
I knew a guy who came home and saw a firetruck & ambulance at his neighbour's house. He watched as they carried the guy out on a stretcher, & asked a fireman what happened, is he all right? The fireman, said, "Yeah, he's only got a concussion. His bed collapsed on them while they were screwing. His girlfriend has it worse, we think she might have broken her back."

My friend is shocked & runs into his house to tell his wife all about it. Only she's not there. He goes back outside in time to see them carry his wife out of the nieghbour's house on the next stretcher.

Bummer.

114 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:18:19pm

re: #109 Steve

Why do they send firetrucks? Anybody know.

usually need more then 2 people to respond.

cardiac needs at least 4.

Because most neighborhoods have a fire station near by, and they are trained as first responders, while hospitals are spread out more thinly than a fire station. Usually the FD can get their first.

115 nyc redneck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:18:20pm

re: #110 chippy

new to this stuff - typing and all...
/

i dinged all your posts up.
:D

116 Basho  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:18:26pm

re: #108 chippy

what happened to it?

i wrote "usually they are trained as paramedics"

Most likely you accidently deleted a "

117 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:18:36pm

re: #105 Racer X

"A duck's head is not going to suddenly pop up on a trout".

Whew!

They haven't seen the ones by the nuke power plant .

118 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:18:37pm
119 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:18:55pm

Padian makes the point at about minute 16 that there is a difference between being a scientist and being a philosophical naturalist, and that is the difference that some fundamentalists continue to blur.

120 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:19:22pm

we had SWAT crawling thru our backyard one day, looking for my neighbor, and asked my husband who was out smoking on the back porch for our address...scared the crap out of him...surrounded our house

he couldn't come up with the address, either!

121 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:19:47pm

re: #118 MandyManners

Necessity is the mother of evolution.

Good to see ya!

122 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:19:52pm

re: #114 Sharmuta

Now that is logical, Miss Blue Knowstuff. Thanks.

123 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:19:59pm

re: #115 nyc redneck

thanks, i needed that!

124 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:20:16pm

re: #120 chippy

we had SWAT crawling thru our backyard one day, looking for my neighbor, and asked my husband who was out smoking on the back porch for our address...scared the crap out of him...surrounded our house

he couldn't come up with the address, either!

Not sure I'd remember my name at that point.

125 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:20:32pm

Just found out a gunstore in our area was broken into and over 140+ or - pistols were stolen.

126 nyc redneck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:20:39pm

re: #123 chippy

thanks, i needed that!

no problem.

127 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:20:41pm

re: #116 Basho

yes i went backwards, somehow, will try to be more careful. this is fun...

129 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:21:16pm

re: #125 Steve

Just found out a gunstore in our area was broken into and over 140+ or - pistols were stolen.

Quick! Enact 50 or so restrictive gun ban laws!

//moonbat

130 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:21:46pm

re: #114 Sharmuta

Because most neighborhoods have a fire station near by, and they are trained as first responders, while hospitals are spread out more thinly than a fire station. Usually the FD can get their first.

Called my brother the fireman to answer the question but yeah they are trained as first responders.

131 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:22:04pm

re: #124 CynicalConservative


yeah well turns out he sent his kids to the other neighbor, shot his wife and then himself. i couldn't get home, the street was roped off. crazy stuff. we moved.

132 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:22:05pm

re: #118 MandyManners

Necessity is the mother of evolution.

I always felt sorry for the kids that ended up with those shitty toys in the ending credits.

133 notutopia  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:22:36pm

Good Night All.

134 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:22:46pm

re: #130 Steve

Called my brother the fireman to answer the question but yeah they are trained as first responders.

More than that- they are usually closer than a hospital paramedic.

135 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:23:00pm

re: #113 Kenneth

I knew a guy=urban legend

136 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:23:10pm

re: #131 chippy

yeah well turns out he sent his kids to the other neighbor, shot his wife and then himself. i couldn't get home, the street was roped off. crazy stuff. we moved.

Good call.

137 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:23:44pm

re: #129 CynicalConservative

It is my favorite gunstore. The guy is about the friendliest, nicest guy you ever met. Allows you to do private gunsales in his store to keep everything honest.

138 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:24:07pm

re: #132 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I always felt sorry for the kids that ended up with those shitty toys in the ending credits.

WHY? Don't you understand the whole freakin' point to it all?!

I'm gonna' hafta' lay a *whack* on you.

139 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:24:15pm

Boy, is Oklahoma ever putting it Mizzou. Ouch.

140 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:24:28pm

re: #132 Fat Bastard Vegetarian


i wondered about that the other night, myself, when we watched it...
who gets those?

141 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:25:12pm

re: #137 Steve

It is my favorite gunstore. The guy is about the friendliest, nicest guy you ever met. Allows you to do private gunsales in his store to keep everything honest.

Absolutely no disrespect intended.
Wish I had one of those near; sucks that it happened to someone like that.

142 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:25:26pm

re: #129 CynicalConservative

Quick! Enact 50 or so restrictive gun ban laws!

//moonbat

About 20 years ago, a gang of thieves was specializing in burglarizing gun stores, and one of the stores owner decided to spend the night at his store with his M-16, the thieves broke into the store and he challenged them and they fired, he went full auto and none survived more than three weeks in the hospital. All three all dead mates!

143 jcm  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:25:28pm

re: #114 Sharmuta

Because most neighborhoods have a fire station near by, and they are trained as first responders, while hospitals are spread out more thinly than a fire station. Usually the FD can get their first.

Most districts, 80% of calls are medical.

144 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:26:14pm

Now that I'm watching the show...

This is really Charles in a wig, isn't it?

/donttasemebro!

145 yah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:26:27pm

True story: In a nice hood in Toledo OH a black high school kid was waiting for the bus on a very every cold morning. He sat down on the curb with a sewer grate at his feet. Lights a match for a smoke. The sewer gas explodes, the metal grate is flung up and smashes his face. He runs to the closest house and bangs on the door for help.
A teenage girl opens the door, sees the black guy with blood running from his face. She screams and faints.

Her mother comes running down the stairs to see what her daughter was screaming for. The mother falls down the stairs and breaks her leg. The End.

146 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:26:29pm

re: #142 LoFlyer

About 20 years ago, a gang of thieves was specializing in burglarizing gun stores, and one of the stores owner decided to spend the night at his store with his M-16, the thieves broke into the store and he challenged them and they fired, he went full auto and none survived more than three weeks in the hospital. All three all dead mates!

Darwin Award front runner candidates

147 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:26:29pm

re: #134 Sharmuta

More than that- they are usually closer than a hospital paramedic.

Ambulances in our area work out of purchased or leased house and spend alot of time just driving around. One of their houses is just under a mile from my place and about the same distance from my brothers fire station. If he is on duty when I have an emergency I get free transport by ambulance to the hospital. Save about 600 to 800 dollars. Cannot ask for better.

148 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:26:31pm

re: #138 MandyManners

WHY? Don't you understand the whole freakin' point to it all?!

I'm gonna' hafta' lay a *whack* on you.

Whack away, girl! They were shitty toys. Some kids going, "Really Santa? A toy that defies all logic? Really Santa? Thanks you...you...elf."

149 Steve  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:27:36pm

re: #144 Dar ul Harb

Now that I'm watching the show...

This is really Charles in a wig, isn't it?

/donttasemebro!

No it is not Charles. He would not be caught wearing a poodle.

150 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:27:55pm

Head of nuclear watchdog calls efforts against Iran 'a failure'

Mohamed ElBaradei urges dialogue between the West and Tehran. He says Obama has given him 'lots of hope.'

Translation: negotiations have failed. Let's do some more.

151 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:28:44pm

re: #148 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Whack away, girl! They were shitty toys. Some kids going, "Really Santa? A toy that defies all logic? Really Santa? Thanks you...you...elf."

a choo choo with square wheels? who got that one?

152 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:28:49pm

re: #142 LoFlyer

About 20 years ago, a gang of thieves was specializing in burglarizing gun stores, and one of the stores owner decided to spend the night at his store with his M-16, the thieves broke into the store and he challenged them and they fired, he went full auto and none survived more than three weeks in the hospital. All three all dead mates!

Dummies probably brought pistols to a rifle fight. Definitely the sort of thing that puts you in the running for a Darwin award.

153 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:28:53pm

re: #149 Steve

No it is not Charles. He would not be caught wearing a poodle.

Because fur is wrong.

154 jcm  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:29:47pm

re: #150 Kenneth

Head of nuclear watchdog calls efforts against Iran 'a failure'


Translation: negotiations have failed. Let's do some more.

Let's discuss the problem for 2-3 years then write a strongly worded letter.

/UN

155 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:30:34pm

re: #151 chippy

a choo choo with square wheels? who got that one?

"When I was young we got trains with square wheels, and we liked them!"

(Salem mode off)

156 Basho  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:30:41pm

re: #152 Dark_Falcon

Dummies probably brought pistols to a rifle fight. Definitely the sort of thing that puts you in the running for a Darwin award.

Way to bring it back on topic. Sweeet! ;)

157 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:31:01pm

re: #121 CynicalConservative

Good to see ya!

Good to see you, too! How are you? I've suddenly, for no explicable reason, found myself in possession of the Christmas spirit! Yeah, The Kid and I decorated the tree (I like my firs like I like my furs--once living, now dead) today but, never before have I got into the spirit (or, had the spirit get into me) at this early date! I've danced a jig all day while I've done seven loads of laundry and scrubbed bathrooms and cooked.

MERRY CHRISTMAS, LIZARDS!

158 Learned Mother of Zion  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:31:30pm

re: #155 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

"When I was young we got trains with square wheels, and we liked them!"

(Salem mode off)

You got trains! We got rocks. And we were grateful.

159 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:31:43pm

re: #156 Basho

Way to bring it back on topic. Sweeet! ;)

Oops, my bad.

160 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:31:44pm

re: #153 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Because fur is wrong.

What fer?

(Bonus points to whoever can supply the punchline from "Granny" on "The Beverly Hillbillies"...)

161 HelloDare  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:32:18pm

re: #154 jcm

Let's discuss the problem for 2-3 years then write a strongly worded letter.

/UN

Mohamed ElBaradei failed.

162 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:32:37pm

re: #148 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Whack away, girl! They were shitty toys. Some kids going, "Really Santa? A toy that defies all logic? Really Santa? Thanks you...you...elf."

The magical spirit of Christmas turned all those toys into perfect ones!

Ah, fergit it.

THAT'S NOT THE FUCKING POINT.

163 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:32:41pm

re: #157 MandyManners

Good to see you, too! How are you? I've suddenly, for no explicable reason, found myself in possession of the Christmas spirit! Yeah, The Kid and I decorated the tree (I like my firs like I like my furs--once living, now dead) today but, never before have I got into the spirit (or, had the spirit get into me) at this early date! I've danced a jig all day while I've done seven loads of laundry and scrubbed bathrooms and cooked.

MERRY CHRISTMAS, LIZARDS!

I am well, thanks. Ducking from the glow of your energy and holiday spirit though.

164 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:32:58pm

re: #152 Dark_Falcon

Dummies probably brought pistols to a rifle fight. Definitely the sort of thing that puts you in the running for a Darwin award.

The best Darwin story I heard was the car smashed car found 200 foot up a cliff utterly destroyed, the story is that the guy mounted side-winder rocket engines up to his car to increase performance. His last words; "watch this mates!"

165 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:33:12pm

I have never heard Imus be so lucid.

166 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:33:27pm

re: #157 MandyManners

Mandy, our tree has been set up for two weeks. Is such a sweet sight to come home to. Merry Christmas back atcha!

(but those are crappy toys)

167 nyc redneck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:33:30pm

re: #157 MandyManners

Good to see you, too! How are you? I've suddenly, for no explicable reason, found myself in possession of the Christmas spirit! Yeah, The Kid and I decorated the tree (I like my firs like I like my furs--once living, now dead) today but, never before have I got into the spirit (or, had the spirit get into me) at this early date! I've danced a jig all day while I've done seven loads of laundry and scrubbed bathrooms and cooked.

MERRY CHRISTMAS, LIZARDS!

hey mandy,
i've been feeling that way since dec.1.
merry christmas.

168 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:34:04pm
169 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:34:04pm

re: #162 MandyManners

I'm lolling.

170 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:34:22pm

re: #163 CynicalConservative

I am well, thanks. Ducking from the glow of your energy and holiday spirit though.

DON'T DUCK.

171 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:35:08pm

Where's that confounded clue-stick?

The United Nations Security Council has imposed three sets of sanctions to try to get Iran to halt uranium enrichment and other activities, while the United States and Europe have offered economic and security incentives. Yet Iran continues acquiring nuclear technology and stockpiling sensitive material.

"We haven't really moved one inch toward addressing the issues," said Mohamed ElBaradei, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA. "I think so far the policy has been a failure."

So let's keep at it!

As an Egyptian who has spent the bulk of his tenure as IAEA chief grappling with the nuclear ambitions of Iran, Iraq, Syria and Libya, he has had a unique understanding of the "psychoses" of Middle Easterners, he said.
"I am able to communicate to them in their own language," he said. "I understand some of their myths, like the conspiracy theories, like a sense of being victims."

172 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:35:17pm

The new data regarding the "big bang" is fascinating, with new evidence of more, much more than we ever could have imagined. That there could be galaxies collapsing on themselves and then supernova and rebirth, it suggests something much much bigger. While we want to be all important and having our essence have as profound a meaning to the whole as it is to us, makes us reject the enormity.

He did an analysis of textbooks and found them not to be written by scientists...

Cake!Celebrate Darwin! Eat cake!

Sentience...morality, consciousness. Very interesting connections.

"If God is an interventionist then he is an underachiever"

Very good presentation Charles. Scratched the surface, advanced the conversations - put very well.

Thank you!

173 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:35:27pm
174 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:35:29pm

re: #166 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Mandy, our tree has been set up for two weeks. Is such a sweet sight to come home to. Merry Christmas back atcha!

(but those are crappy toys)

*WHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACK
WHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACK*

175 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:35:31pm

Good video Charles. Nice find.

176 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:35:34pm

re: #168 Iron Fist

Because thieves will respect Gun Laws. So will drug dealers and your random street thugs. Gun control saves lives!

(the lives of criminals, to be precise)

Of course they will!

/// So says the LLL and O'Bambi

177 Maine's Michael  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:00pm

What with the wig on the perfesser?

178 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:10pm

re: #151 chippy

a choo choo with square wheels? who got that one?

The engineer!

179 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:11pm

re: #170 MandyManners

DON'T DUCK.

Hiding from the holidays for 25 years running...

180 jcm  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:31pm

re: #161 HelloDare

Mohamed ElBaradei failed.

Did he?

What was his criteria for success?

I think Mohamed ElBaradei got want he wanted.

181 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:33pm

re: #167 nyc redneck

hey mandy,
i've been feeling that way since dec.1.
merry christmas.

Good for you!

182 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:37pm

re: #170 MandyManners

DON'T DUCK.

Haar, glad you are in the spirit, I don't get into the spirit until Christmas eve! Christmas has not been one bit of fun since I divorced, but things are a heck of a lot better now mates!

183 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:53pm

re: #175 swamprat

Good video Charles. Nice find.

It was a good video, but it ended at what sounded like an interesting point.

I've been unable to go to the "full video" to watch the whole thing (my internet connection completely crashes for some reason, which it does from time to time on some sites).

But I wish I could have heard the rest of it.

184 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:58pm

OT: Interesting things coming over the wire on the last couple of hours:

US Congress / Auto Companies reach accord on bailout - Xinhua

Pakistan expected Indian retaliatory invasion - AFP

185 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:36:58pm

re: #169 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I'm lolling.

Bad for your posture.

186 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:37:31pm

re: #143 jcm

Most districts, 80% of calls are medical.

Back in '84 was changing out the rear-end on a 1978 Chevy Impala. Had 2 10 ton jack stands on the frame and a 5 ton jack supporting the center section of the rear-end. Reaching around to put the last bolt in the upper trailing arm and I hear a low rumble. Next thing I know the rear-end is across my right forearm, the gas tank has collapsed and is on my left shoulder, and the frame rail has landed on my hip. For some strange reason, I couldn't breath very well. After about 5 minutes the wife comes out of the house and see's what has happened. she freaks. Runs across the street and gets our neighbor, who jacks the car off me. I roll out from under the car, sitting on the hood smoking a cig, the ambulance arrives and I tell them Yes I was under the car. They picked me up slammed me to the ground cut my clothes off. take me to the hospital, xray every part of me and find NOTHING except a dislocated left shoulder. Doc popped it back into place, gave me some Tylenol (not #3) and sent me home. Wasn't until 2001 when the problem finally showed up.

187 yah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:37:36pm

re: #174 MandyManners
How come your rectangle is bigger than all the others?
How'd you do that?

188 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:37:50pm

re: #164 LoFlyer

The best Darwin story I heard was the car smashed car found 200 foot up a cliff utterly destroyed, the story is that the guy mounted side-winder rocket engines up to his car to increase performance. His last words; "watch this mates!"

Last recorded words you mean. His actual last word were probably "Oh Sh[splat]".

189 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:38:09pm

re: #171 Kenneth

Where's that confounded clue-stick?

Do he and David Icke and Alex Jones have each other on their cell's speed-dials?

190 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:38:18pm

re: #155 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Aw, cute avatar. Back in my day, we put malaise on our sandwiches!

191 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:38:35pm

re: #183 reine.de.tout

I had to go to the fora.tv site and search for 'Padian' to get the full length video.

192 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:38:46pm

I liked the point Padian makes about sloppy language and saying "belief" in the science. I've had a few people recently ask me if I believed in evolution, and I've told them no- I accept it's veracity. Bringing in terms like "belief" plays into the hands of the creationists who think science is competing with religion.

193 Right mind left  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:38:55pm

re: #158 Alouette

You got trains! We got rocks. And we were grateful.

Evolved the "pet rock" sensation! Now THAT was a GIFT! :)

194 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:38:58pm

re: #179 CynicalConservative

Hiding from the holidays for 25 years running...

Any reason you'd share here?

195 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:39:11pm

re: #190 Salem

Aw, cute avatar. Back in my day, we put malaise on our sandwiches!

I'm trying to decide if that falls under TMI or not.

196 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:39:24pm

re: #180 jcm

I think Mohamed ElBaradei got want he wanted.

Why yes, yes he did.

During the interview, ElBaradei, who is scheduled to retire in about a year, shed his severe public persona, punctuating freewheeling comments about weapons proliferation, world peace and contemporary politics with laughter. He sat surrounded by his collection of African art while wearing a gray pinstriped suit and a bright orange Salvatore Ferragamo tie.

He spoke of possibly living in southern France, where he recently purchased a home.

"It's nice to try something else," he said. "All I know is, I think I would like to continue to do public service."

197 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:39:41pm

Mandy, the spirit filled lizard
Had a very shiny tact
And you ever crossed her
She'd make sure that you got whacked!

198 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:39:41pm

re: #174 MandyManners

*WHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACK
WHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACKWHACK*

Careful, Mandy. All that whacking will make you go blind. :)

199 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:39:42pm
200 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:01pm

re: #186 saberry0530

. . .
Doc popped it back into place, gave me some Tylenol (not #3) and sent me home. Wasn't until 2001 when the problem finally showed up.

So, I just looked for you throughout the entire thread to see what was the "problem" that showed up in 2001 . . . are you gonna finish the story?

201 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:03pm

re: #182 LoFlyer

Haar, glad you are in the spirit, I don't get into the spirit until Christmas eve! Christmas has not been one bit of fun since I divorced, but things are a heck of a lot better now mates!

I usually get into it long about the 20th or so. I've no idea what got into me this year.

202 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:16pm

re: #191 jaunte

I had to go to the fora.tv site and search for 'Padian' to get the full length video.

thanks, I'll try it.

203 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:19pm

re: #198 Dark_Falcon

Careful, Mandy. All that whacking will make you go blind. :)

Haar!

204 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:22pm

re: #183 reine.de.tout

In the lower right corner of the video it says "watch full program". Click that.

205 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:49pm

Or here:

[Link: fora.tv...]

206 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:51pm

re: #187 yah

How come your rectangle is bigger than all the others?
How'd you do that?

I have a rectangle?

207 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:40:55pm

re: #195 CynicalConservative

I'm trying to decide if that falls under TMI or not.

You know-Carter, malaise, shit-sandwich... Aw NM...

208 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:41:03pm
209 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:41:12pm

re: #192 Sharmuta

I liked the point Padian makes about sloppy language and saying "belief" in the science. I've had a few people recently ask me if I believed in evolution, and I've told them no- I accept it's veracity. Bringing in terms like "belief" plays into the hands of the creationists who think science is competing with religion.

That is a good point. Also there was a point in there about folks not understanding "theory" in the scientific sense.

210 jcm  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:41:16pm

re: #186 saberry0530

We would have done the same thing, but more gently.

211 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:41:19pm

re: #190 Salem

Glad you saw that. The other night you said something to that effect and it just caught me funny.

212 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:41:41pm

re: #204 Sharmuta

In the lower right corner of the video it says "watch full program". Click that.

Did. Crashed my internet connection. I'll try it another way.

213 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:42:13pm

re: #192 Sharmuta

I liked the point Padian makes about sloppy language and saying "belief" in the science. I've had a few people recently ask me if I believed in evolution, and I've told them no- I accept it's veracity. Bringing in terms like "belief" plays into the hands of the creationists who think science is competing with religion.

Perhaps that's just a reflection on the degredation of our language. Just think how the word "feel" has invaded.

214 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:42:27pm

re: #209 reine.de.tout

That is a good point. Also there was a point in there about folks not understanding "theory" in the scientific sense.

We still deal with that issue on these threads- I'm afraid it's a small point that's here to stay.

215 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:42:48pm

re: #197 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Mandy, the spirit filled lizard
Had a very shiny tact
And you ever crossed her
She'd make sure that you got whacked!

LOL!

216 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:42:55pm

re: #211 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Glad you saw that. The other night you said something to that effect and it just caught me funny.

That's a Saturday Night Live shtick. Wish I could take credit for it.

217 nyc redneck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:43:07pm

re: #213 MandyManners

Perhaps that's just a reflection on the degredation of our language. Just think how the word "feel" has invaded.

not to mention 'hope' and 'change'.

218 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:43:24pm

re: #198 Dark_Falcon

Careful, Mandy. All that whacking will make you go blind. :)

It ain't self-whacking.

219 Basho  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:43:44pm

re: #192 Sharmuta

I've been trying to put that thought about 'not believing in science but accepting its veracity' into words for a long time because I realized "belief" is a misnomer. Thanks for making it clear, I favorited that comment.

220 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:43:58pm

Any chance we can declare this the SNDT and leave sensibility to another thread mates?

221 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:43:59pm

re: #194 MandyManners

Any reason you'd share here?

General cynicism in how holiday's are treated vs. the reason they were created as holidays to begin with. Christmas is the worst for me with the gross commercialism and random traditions that don't seem to tie back in any way to the religious origins of it.

222 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:44:32pm

re: #214 Sharmuta

We still deal with that issue on these threads- I'm afraid it's a small point that's here to stay.

Yeah, that's what I thought about when I heard that, how many times has that been discussed here? And some people are blind and deaf when it comes to understanding it.

223 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:44:35pm

re: #199 Iron Fist

The existing gun laws are a complete clusterfuck. You will likely spend more time in prison for having an unregiserted machinegun than you would for rape. I'd argue that that is so disproportinate as to ammount to cruel and unusal punishment.

Very well said and completely agree.

224 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:44:42pm

re: #217 nyc redneck

not to mention 'hope' and 'change'.

I'm talking about a long-term invasion.

225 yah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:44:44pm

re: #206 MandyManners
Yes, the rectangle all of our posts are in - all of them go about an inch from the gray line to the right, your big whack post rectangle goes all the way to the line -

226 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:44:47pm

re: #218 MandyManners

It ain't self-whacking.

True, I just needed a laugh. The snow made for a slow sales day today here in Chicagoland.

227 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:45:37pm

re: #220 LoFlyer

Any chance we can declare this the SNDT and leave sensibility to another thread mates?

Not a bad idea!

228 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:45:42pm

re: #200 reine.de.tout

So, I just looked for you throughout the entire thread to see what was the "problem" that showed up in 2001 . . . are you gonna finish the story?

Left scapula was cracked behind the ball from the pressure of the car. Developed a Unicameral Bone Cyst that literally devoured the good bone in the shoulder blade. The cat scan before the surgery revealed that I had broken my scapula 11 times over the years. No wonder the damned thing hurt all the time. Funny thing about UBC's, they normally are found in 8 to 14 year olds. 3 surgeries and 6 years later its' finally gone. Recovery time for the first surgery was 5 months.

229 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:46:05pm

re: #198 Dark_Falcon

No it won't. Trust me.

230 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:46:26pm

re: #226 Dark_Falcon

True, I just needed a laugh. The snow made for a slow sales day today here in Chicagoland.

Snow in Chicago is a test of endurance, only those with a sense of humor need apply!

231 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:47:35pm

re: #183 reine.de.tout

They manage to jam evolution and religious thought into the same box; It's a sloppy fit, but they don't care...Then they add in a dig at those atheists who have absolutely no doubts about their own consequence in this huge universe. Add in some fascinating evo-facts about whale lineage, and you have the Church and Science warily circling each other before they quite cautiously shake hands.

232 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:47:50pm

re: #228 saberry0530

Left scapula was cracked behind the ball from the pressure of the car. Developed a Unicameral Bone Cyst that literally devoured the good bone in the shoulder blade. The cat scan before the surgery revealed that I had broken my scapula 11 times over the years. No wonder the damned thing hurt all the time. Funny thing about UBC's, they normally are found in 8 to 14 year olds. 3 surgeries and 6 years later its' finally gone. Recovery time for the first surgery was 5 months.

Bummer mate! Glad you have recovered, that cannot have been any fun...

233 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:47:54pm

re: #228 saberry0530

Left scapula was cracked behind the ball from the pressure of the car. Developed a Unicameral Bone Cyst that literally devoured the good bone in the shoulder blade. The cat scan before the surgery revealed that I had broken my scapula 11 times over the years. No wonder the damned thing hurt all the time. Funny thing about UBC's, they normally are found in 8 to 14 year olds. 3 surgeries and 6 years later its' finally gone. Recovery time for the first surgery was 5 months.

Good grief! I can't believe that went on for that long and neither you nor your doctors had any idea!
Or wait! Are you one of those guys like the Roi, who NEVER sees a doc for anything?

234 Bill Dalasio  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:47:56pm

Why is it that the creationists and hardcore materialists sound disturbingly like one another? Look, God Almighty isn't just a carbon copy of us. God isn't constrained by space time. In fact, the best guess is that space time is itself a divine creation. Do you all understand what that means? It means that science and religion ultimately can't say anything about one another. All of the physical development of the universe and all of the course of evelution can simply be a stroke of God's brush on the universe of space and time that He/She/It created. The point being that the course of events is itself God's creation. Yeah I know that possibility is hard for you to wrap your little minds around. It's a lot more fun for the Discovery Institute folks to try to pretend that everything HAS to support a literal interpretation of scrpture and it's a lot more fun for the Dawkins devotees to play with their peckers about how much more rational they are than everyone else. But, here is the bottom line, God isn't subject to our presumptions and self-aggrandizement.

235 livefreeor die  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:48:55pm

re: #132 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I always felt sorry for the kids that ended up with those shitty toys in the ending credits.

This is the quote of the night for our household! My husband and I are in hysterics.

236 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:48:59pm
237 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:49:10pm

re: #221 CynicalConservative

General cynicism in how holiday's are treated vs. the reason they were created as holidays to begin with. Christmas is the worst for me with the gross commercialism and random traditions that don't seem to tie back in any way to the religious origins of it.

Full disclosure as well,

I don't believe in organized religion, I don't have kids, I respect each person's choice in both of these areas.

238 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:49:35pm

re: #221 CynicalConservative

General cynicism in how holiday's are treated vs. the reason they were created as holidays to begin with. Christmas is the worst for me with the gross commercialism and random traditions that don't seem to tie back in any way to the religious origins of it.

I got over that by realizing that Christ's birth is not the reason for the season. His birth likely did not happen during this period. From what I've gathered, this is an adaptation of pagan holidays by the Roman Catholic church many years ago.

However, our society has adopted this time to reach out to others and give gifts, to share a communal feeling.

Maybe I'm full of shit. But, there you go!

239 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:49:48pm

Memorable quote; "science does not explain, science describes.

240 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:49:58pm
241 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:50:26pm

re: #225 yah

Yes, the rectangle all of our posts are in - all of them go about an inch from the gray line to the right, your big whack post rectangle goes all the way to the line -

Oh, no. I blew the margin?! I hit the RETURN button just to avoid that.

GAH1

242 Basho  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:50:31pm

re: #213 MandyManners

Perhaps that's just a reflection on the degredation of our language. Just think how the word "feel" has invaded.

"Atheism is a religion in the same way that creationism is a science or Islam is a religion of peace. In other words, when language no longer means anything."
~Pat Condell

243 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:50:33pm

re: #230 LoFlyer

Snow in Chicago is a test of endurance, only those with a sense of humor need apply!

Especially this year. The streets are being plowed but not until the main snowfall has passed (except main throughfares, which are kept clear). Chicago and most of its suburbs have had to cut their plowing budgets because of the recession and, given the long-range predictions, this winter will be decidedly unpleasant. Lots of snow and no vacation. Nothing to be done save endure and wait for better times.

244 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:50:56pm

re: #238 MandyManners

I got over that by realizing that Christ's birth is not the reason for the season. His birth likely did not happen during this period. From what I've gathered, this is an adaptation of pagan holidays by the Roman Catholic church many years ago.

However, our society has adopted this time to reach out to others and give gifts, to share a communal feeling.

Maybe I'm full of shit. But, there you go!

Haar! Good thoughts Mandy! Thanks for the insight...

245 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:51:27pm

re: #222 reine.de.tout

Yeah, that's what I thought about when I heard that, how many times has that been discussed here? And some people are blind and deaf when it comes to understanding it.

And you and I both know that some of these people may be honestly not sure what's going on with this ongoing discussion. We were able to learn and so are others. So, we'll have to keep informing people of the difference. It's their reaction that will clue us in as to whether or not they're honest or if they're here to shill the ID line.

246 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:51:51pm

re: #233 reine.de.tout

Good grief! I can't believe that went on for that long and neither you nor your doctors had any idea!
Or wait! Are you one of those guys like the Roi, who NEVER sees a doc for anything?

No, It hurt like hell and I went to 5 or 6 different doctors, took significant amounts of Loritabs, and had a number of MRI and Xrays. It took an Old Navy ortho doctor who goes, "I haven't seen one of these in 30 years". Next day I was in surgery.

247 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:51:56pm

re: #219 Basho

Thanks- that means a lot to me, Basho.

248 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:53:33pm

re: #238 MandyManners

I got over that by realizing that Christ's birth is not the reason for the season. His birth likely did not happen during this period. From what I've gathered, this is an adaptation of pagan holidays by the Roman Catholic church many years ago.

However, our society has adopted this time to reach out to others and give gifts, to share a communal feeling.

Maybe I'm full of shit. But, there you go!

My 237 probably clarifies a bit as well on the religious aspects of it. I tend to bristle at things that are "expected" regardless of understanding and belief which is part and parcel to how I was raised. As it stands now, my choice is avoidance and tolerance by exclusion. I realize that I have much to learn and experience but its a personal journey.

249 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:54:15pm

re: #234 Bill Dalasio

Why is it that the creationists and hardcore materialists sound disturbingly like one another? Look, God Almighty isn't just a carbon copy of us. God isn't constrained by space time. In fact, the best guess is that space time is itself a divine creation. Do you all understand what that means? It means that science and religion ultimately can't say anything about one another. All of the physical development of the universe and all of the course of evelution can simply be a stroke of God's brush on the universe of space and time that He/She/It created. The point being that the course of events is itself God's creation. Yeah I know that possibility is hard for you to wrap your little minds around. It's a lot more fun for the Discovery Institute folks to try to pretend that everything HAS to support a literal interpretation of scrpture and it's a lot more fun for the Dawkins devotees to play with their peckers about how much more rational they are than everyone else. But, here is the bottom line, God isn't subject to our presumptions and self-aggrandizement.


Wow, man! I sort of agree with you but it sounds like you're smokin'.

250 yah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:55:09pm

re: #234 Bill Dalasio

You make some a good points, but they will probably be discarded because of your insults.

251 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:55:11pm

re: #236 Iron Fist

Back in the USMC days I had a half cast that I cut off my left fore-arm, installed some hinges and then put it back on. The itching was driving me crazy! Navy Docs took extreme umbrage for some reason.

252 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:55:58pm

re: #246 saberry0530

No, It hurt like hell and I went to 5 or 6 different doctors, took significant amounts of Loritabs, and had a number of MRI and Xrays. It took an Old Navy ortho doctor who goes, "I haven't seen one of these in 30 years". Next day I was in surgery.

Yaar, the navy has two kinds of doctors, either the best in the world or near incompetent! Glad you found a good one who could straighten you out mate...

253 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:56:32pm

re: #18 Salem

I'm getting no audio.

Aha! I had to close Firefox and reopen it...

254 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:57:01pm

re: #235 livefreeor die

If I was cool laid back lizard I'd ignore that post. But I'm not, so...
Gush! Wheeze! Thanks! Glad I made ya happy.

255 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:57:24pm

re: #246 saberry0530

No, It hurt like hell and I went to 5 or 6 different doctors, took significant amounts of Loritabs, and had a number of MRI and Xrays. It took an Old Navy ortho doctor who goes, "I haven't seen one of these in 30 years". Next day I was in surgery.

They must not have been looking at a grown man expecting to see something that normally occurs in boys or teens.

I have a medical condition that normally occurs in children, who then outgrow it. In my case, it appeared when I was 40 and I will not outgrow it; but it took the doc 12 years to figure it out.

256 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:58:34pm

re: #255 reine.de.tout

They must not have been looking at a grown man expecting to see something that normally occurs in boys or teens.

I have a medical condition that normally occurs in children, who then outgrow it. In my case, it appeared when I was 40 and I will not outgrow it; but it took the doc 12 years to figure it out.

SO that makes us both young at heart!

257 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 7:58:57pm

re: #256 saberry0530

SO that makes us both young at heart!

heh.
Yep.
At least, until I look in the mirror LOL!

258 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:00:19pm

re: #257 reine.de.tout

heh.
Yep.
At least, until I look in the mirror LOL!

I was talking to my Mom who is near 80 and was telling me she did not feel old one bit. 'Me hats off to you dad! Good work!

259 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:00:37pm

re: #242 Basho

"Atheism is a religion in the same way that creationism is a science or Islam is a religion of peace. In other words, when language no longer means anything."
~Pat Condell

Ah, Pat.

I wonder how he's doing nowadays.

Do you think we could sponser his petition to immigrate to the U.S.A.?

260 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:01:01pm

re: #244 LoFlyer

Haar! Good thoughts Mandy! Thanks for the insight...

I'm no scholar.

261 SlartyBartfast  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:01:42pm

re: #192 Sharmuta

Remember the Republican Primary debate in which the candidates were asked if they believed in evolution? What an idiotic question!

262 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:02:02pm
263 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:03:11pm

re: #248 CynicalConservative

My 237 probably clarifies a bit as well on the religious aspects of it. I tend to bristle at things that are "expected" regardless of understanding and belief which is part and parcel to how I was raised. As it stands now, my choice is avoidance and tolerance by exclusion. I realize that I have much to learn and experience but its a personal journey.

I will not presume to ask how old you are.

That said, it's a good thing that you know that you don't know.

264 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:03:26pm
265 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:03:39pm

People are STILL trying to post Obama birth certificate garbage here, and those links will be deleted. I'm right on the brink of banning people who continue with this debunked, stupid, embarrassing crap.

266 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:03:46pm

re: #260 MandyManners

I'm no scholar.

Well our next president is, and we will have to see how well his education guides him and us through the next four years, but I did enjoy your thoughts on Christmas, mate!

267 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:04:12pm

re: #262 ploome hineni

How are you doing?

268 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:05:13pm

re: #234 Bill Dalasio

But, here is the bottom line, God isn't subject to our presumptions and self-aggrandizement.

How dare you. Everyone knows that God moves only in ways that are comprehensible to the average DI shill.
/

269 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:05:14pm
270 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:05:46pm

re: #264 Iron Fist

I disagree with that. Atheism requires faith that there is not, and never has been, a god. This can't be proven.

What I don[' tunderstand is the "evangelical" atheists who try and convince people to believe as they do. If they are right, it doesn't matter.

And never has.

Ummm...the following is my post.

Ah, Pat.

I wonder how he's doing nowadays.

Do you think we could sponser his petition to immigrate to the U.S.A.?

271 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:00pm

re: #265 Charles

Is there any way to auto-delete them?

272 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:05pm

re: #263 MandyManners

I will not presume to ask how old you are.

That said, it's a good thing that you know that you don't know.

No problem on asking, and not ashamed to claim 38 years of learning with hopefully many more to come.

273 SlartyBartfast  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:13pm

re: #264 Iron Fist

I disagree with that. Atheism requires faith that there is not, and never has been, a god. This can't be proven.

What I don[' tunderstand is the "evangelical" atheists who try and convince people to believe as they do. If they are right, it doesn't matter.

And never has.

Evangelical atheists...coming right up!

274 saberry0530  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:21pm

Got a long day tomorrow. Have a safe evening lizards.

275 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:21pm
276 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:56pm

re: #265 Charles

People are STILL trying to post Obama birth certificate garbage here, and those links will be deleted. I'm right on the brink of banning people who continue with this debunked, stupid, embarrassing crap.

Charles, they will never get smarter if you ban them, and I thought that was the part of the idea behind LGF, to educate those who are clueless!

277 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:58pm

re: #266 LoFlyer

Well our next president is, and we will have to see how well his education guides him and us through the next four years, but I did enjoy your thoughts on Christmas, mate!

CBBHO is no fucking scholar. It's a fucking lie. Don't believe that shit.

278 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:06:59pm

re: #265 Charles

Troofer 2.0

279 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:07:18pm

re: #265 Charles

Nirth Cert haz been eated.
/common knowledge

280 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:07:20pm
281 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:07:59pm

re: #265 Charles

People are STILL trying to post Obama birth certificate garbage here, and those links will be deleted. I'm right on the brink of banning people who continue with this debunked, stupid, embarrassing crap.

Ugh, such a shame that you have to dedicate resources to this garbage.

282 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:08:16pm

re: #234 Bill Dalasio

"our little minds?"

I don't believe, in either science or religion. There are questions I don't and can't know the answer to, just as there are questions you can't and don't know the answer to.

There are however things I can know, and for the rest of my life I will rely on what I can know. You are welcome to believe what you wish, but please stop with the false dichotomy and ad hominem.

Because I can't believe your god exists doesn't diminish or attack your ability to do so. I don't begrudge you believing, please don't begrudge me not believing.

/perhaps you should have been more definitive about who you are talking about with "your little minds? Maybe "they all" instead of "you all"?

283 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:08:20pm
284 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:08:34pm

re: #272 CynicalConservative

No problem on asking, and not ashamed to claim 38 years of learning with hopefully many more to come.

Well, there you go.

285 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:08:50pm

re: #277 MandyManners

CBBHO is no fucking scholar. It's a fucking lie. Don't believe that shit.

Definitely not a scholar, just a poseur.

286 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:09:01pm

re: #265 Charles

People are STILL trying to post Obama birth certificate garbage here, and those links will be deleted. I'm right on the brink of banning people who continue with this debunked, stupid, embarrassing crap.


You never want to teach the controversy!

/ducks

287 WriterMom  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:09:14pm

re: #99 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Most firemen know CPR, and have O2 tanks on their trucks. They also usually know first aid.

288 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:09:23pm

re: #269 Iron Fist

I don't know that I'd call Obama a "scholar". Snake-oil salesman is more like it.

I have been told he has an IQ of 146. I find that hard to believe as anyone with average or above average intelligence would never contemplate running for president. It is truly the national boobie prize!

289 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:09:35pm

re: #277 MandyManners

Mandy, was doing a little wiki study about Rudolph. Rankin said in 2007 the little girl doll's problem was psychological. Thought that was funny.

290 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:09:59pm

re: #275 ploome hineni

dragging myself around

:(

Oh, so sorry to hear! This sounds like it's more than just a cold.
check your e-mails if you haven't looked lately.

291 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:09:59pm

re: #274 saberry0530

Got a long day tomorrow. Have a safe evening lizards.

Sleep well!

292 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:10pm

re: #273 SlartyBartfast

I wish the Evangelical atheists were so cool they handed out blank pages. Unfortunately they are prone to passing out insulting crap .
An embarrassment to godlessness.

293 WriterMom  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:12pm

re: #283 ploome hineni

LOL. I bet Obama would be happy to share!

294 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:13pm
295 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:18pm

re: #234 Bill Dalasio

Why is it that the creationists and hardcore materialists sound disturbingly like one another? Look, God Almighty isn't just a carbon copy of us. God isn't constrained by space time. In fact, the best guess is that space time is itself a divine creation. Do you all understand what that means? It means that science and religion ultimately can't say anything about one another. All of the physical development of the universe and all of the course of evelution can simply be a stroke of God's brush on the universe of space and time that He/She/It created. The point being that the course of events is itself God's creation. Yeah I know that possibility is hard for you to wrap your little minds around. It's a lot more fun for the Discovery Institute folks to try to pretend that everything HAS to support a literal interpretation of scrpture and it's a lot more fun for the Dawkins devotees to play with their peckers about how much more rational they are than everyone else. But, here is the bottom line, God isn't subject to our presumptions and self-aggrandizement.

"You see? You see! Your stupid minds! Stupid!"

296 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:33pm

re: #272 CynicalConservative


That was about the age that I started questioning the whole materialistic holiday season. I began to avoid & ignore, or at least procrastinate as much as possible, but every year it just gets worse.

297 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:35pm
298 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:35pm

re: #282 Thanos

"our little minds?"

I don't believe, in either science or religion. There are questions I don't and can't know the answer to, just as there are questions you can't and don't know the answer to.

There are however things I can know, and for the rest of my life I will rely on what I can know. You are welcome to believe what you wish, but please stop with the false dichotomy and ad hominem.

Because I can't believe your god exists doesn't diminish or attack your ability to do so. I don't begrudge you believing, please don't begrudge me not believing.

/perhaps you should have been more definitive about who you are talking about with "your little minds? Maybe "they all" instead of "you all"?

Thanks for this, I couldn't have said it better myself (or at all since I haven't posted it previously.)

299 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:10:58pm

re: #275 ploome hineni

dragging myself around

:(

Drag your ass to the ER! The nearest URGENT CARE CLINIC.

300 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:11:00pm
301 WriterMom  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:11:05pm

re: #294 ploome hineni

OPI?

302 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:11:07pm

re: #283 ploome hineni

I, on the other hand, have no birth certificate

Well, you don't exist then!
//

303 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:11:09pm

re: #294 ploome hineni

I must let you all know,I found the perfect color nailpolish

perfect

Don't keep it a secret!

304 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:11:45pm

re: #279 Killgore Trout

Nirth Cert haz been eated.
/common knowledge

An LOLCATZ thing about that would be fantastic.

305 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:11:50pm

re: #160 Dar ul Harb

What fer?

(Bonus points to whoever can supply the punchline from "Granny" on "The Beverly Hillbillies"...)

Time's up.

Jethro: What fer?

Granny: Cat fur, fer makin' kitten britches! Now git!
*whacks Jethro*

306 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:12:27pm
307 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:12:49pm

re: #285 CynicalConservative

Definitely not a scholar, just a poseur.

Soros' alter-ego, mebbe.

308 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:12:51pm

re: #284 MandyManners

Well, there you go.

Much appreciated, have had many attacks over the years.

309 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:13:08pm

re: #287 WriterMom

Most firemen know CPR, and have O2 tanks on their trucks. They also usually know first aid.

Wow, you learn plenty about firemen from studying their calenders!

310 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:13:09pm

re: #299 MandyManners

Drag your ass to the ER! The nearest URGENT CARE CLINIC.

I agree our Ploomie needs to see a doc.
Colds don't last this long.

311 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:13:37pm

re: #301 WriterMom

OPI?

I would think it has to be. Their colors are the best. I wonder if Ploome's gonna share?

312 Stonemason  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:13:58pm

re: #292 Killgore Trout

I wish the Evangelical atheists were so cool they handed out blank pages. Unfortunately they are prone to passing out insulting crap .
An embarrassment to godlessness.

I have to agree with you there. If the sign had stopped at "natural world" it would have been fine, but it became insulting after that. One would imagine the nativity is not insulting to those who do not believe.

313 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:14:31pm

re: #287 WriterMom

Most firemen know CPR, and have O2 tanks on their trucks. They also usually know first aid.

Oh, I hope so.

314 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:14:41pm

re: #296 chippy

That was about the age that I started questioning the whole materialistic holiday season. I began to avoid & ignore, or at least procrastinate as much as possible, but every year it just gets worse.

I started questioning in my mid teens, it hasn't gotten any better, especially as friends and family have had kids. It never gets easier.

315 Dan G.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:14:47pm

Is he trying to emulate Sir Issac Newton's mane?

316 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:00pm

Religious people are going to continue to proselytize to others, I don't see why atheists should be regarded as scoundrels for trying to convince people that atheism is correct.

317 WriterMom  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:10pm

re: #309 Kenneth

LOL! Good one. Hahahahhahaa...

318 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:18pm

re: #289 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Mandy, was doing a little wiki study about Rudolph. Rankin said in 2007 the little girl doll's problem was psychological. Thought that was funny.

You WIKI'ed RUDOLPH?

You're fucking sick, man.

319 nyc redneck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:28pm

re: #310 reine.de.tout

I agree our Ploomie needs to see a doc.
Colds don't last this long.

my friend has walking pneumonia.
she was sick nearly 6 wks. before she went to the doc.

320 Dan G.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:29pm

I actually grew my hair out like that once, it looked similar (save the color).

321 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:42pm

re: #297 Iron Fist

There are so fucking many reasons to oppose Obama, that this becomes really insignificant. He is the President-elect, and no Court is going to step in and remove him, no matter what the circumstances.

Focus on the battles we can win.

Absolutely.

322 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:53pm

re: #316 Salem

Religious people are going to continue to proselytize to others, I don't see why atheists should be regarded as scoundrels for trying to convince people that atheism is correct.

Perhaps some religious people proselytize. But not all.

323 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:54pm

re: #318 MandyManners

Trying to understand the shitty toys.

324 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:15:57pm

LOL- Padian says it's turtles all the way down.

325 WriterMom  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:16:01pm

re: #313 MandyManners

FIRE FIRE! Have mercy!

Suburban 911!

326 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:16:09pm

re: #292 Killgore Trout

I wish the Evangelical atheists were so cool they handed out blank pages. Unfortunately they are prone to passing out insulting crap .
An embarrassment to godlessness.

So that would make every Office Depot an official Church. Where "reams" of Sacred Texts are stored and then sold. Too bad Hubbard never thought of this one!

327 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:16:32pm

re: #307 MandyManners

Soros' alter-ego, mebbe.

Understudy.

328 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:16:35pm

re: #319 nyc redneck

my friend has walking pneumonia.
she was sick nearly 6 wks. before she went to the doc.

Well, that settles it then.

PLOOME - GET TO A DOCTOR

329 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:16:42pm

re: #325 WriterMom

Down girl!

330 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:16:48pm

re: #324 Sharmuta

And apparently it's an in-joke.

331 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:17:13pm

re: #308 CynicalConservative

Much appreciated, have had many attacks over the years.

Just do what you need. It's not about anyone but YOU.

(((CC)))

332 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:17:18pm

re: #323 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Trying to understand the shitty toys.

I cannot believe you're still concerned about who got those "shitty" toys.
I always liked getting the "shitty" toys.
I figured they were lonesome and needed love.

333 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:17:58pm

re: #316 Salem

Religious people are going to continue to proselytize to others, I don't see why atheists should be regarded as scoundrels for trying to convince people that atheism is correct.

Agree on both fronts, and will add that both (all?) sides would be better served by 'Live and let live'.

334 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:17:59pm

re: #330 jaunte

And apparently it's an in-joke.

The lady didn't get it.

335 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:18:05pm

re: #332 reine.de.tout

Yeah toots, but your weird.

336 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:18:24pm

re: #322 reine.de.tout

Perhaps some religious people proselytize. But not all.

One of my very best friends became religious and never tried to convince me. In fact, he tolerated my own comic blasphemies with calm bemusement.

337 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:18:32pm

Washington State's anti-creche

338 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:18:40pm

re: #310 reine.de.tout

I agree our Ploomie needs to see a doc.
Colds don't last this long.

They do if there is some sort of pulmonary issue. I'M NOT A DOCTOR.

339 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:18:50pm

re: #306 Iron Fist

146 is less impressive than Obama would like to make it. IQ tests aren't really reliable indications of intelligence. They are just a statistic.

True, and I have learned that "thinking outside the box" makes up for a lot of deficiencies mentally! I am actually fairly impressed with his cabinet choices. Leaving Robert Gates as SecDef pissed off a lot of DU'er and KosKidz and showed some real maturity in Obama's thinking versus what his campaign was promising to the lefty libs!

340 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:18:57pm
341 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:19:38pm

re: #331 MandyManners

Just do what you need. It's not about anyone but YOU.

(((CC)))

Thank you! I think my 333 in response to Salem's 316 expresses the same sentiment.

{MandyManners}

342 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:19:38pm

re: #292 Killgore Trout

I wish the Evangelical atheists were so cool they handed out blank pages. Unfortunately they are prone to passing out insulting crap .
An embarrassment to godlessness.

It seems there are some people who want to make a pretend religion out of atheism. Not good.

343 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:19:48pm

re: #333 CynicalConservative

Agree on both fronts, and will add that both (all?) sides would be better served by 'Live and let live'.

I could live with that.

344 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:19:53pm
345 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:19:59pm
346 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:20:16pm

re: #340 ploome hineni

its a very intense dark red,,almost a retro red color

but nail color has to look good with your skin

And the brand and color name are . . . ?

347 SlartyBartfast  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:20:18pm

re: #288 LoFlyer

Whenever someone states a person's IQ as some absolute, invariable number they're full of B.S. (And, LoFlyer, I'm not saying you're full of it. Question the source!)

Anyway, it would be more accurate to say, "My IQ has been measured as high as...", but a person's score will vary day-to-day. I've been given the Stanford-Binet standard test at least 4 times...never twice the same score.

348 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:20:47pm

re: #305 Dar ul Harb

However, this blog remembers it as an exchange between Granny and Elly May.

349 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:21:00pm

re: #340 ploome hineni

Hey Ploome. Get well.

Goodnight friends.

Toolbox is over the North Pacific.

350 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:21:07pm

The Fark Kiddies don't know what to think about my stance against the Obama nirth sertifikit lunacy:

[Link: forums.fark.com...]

Am I a hate-filled fanatic, or a pretty reasonable guy? Stay tuned for the next thrilling episode.

351 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:21:20pm

re: #344 ploome hineni

ewww

well, I am going to the dentist Monday, soed that count?

ok, Iwill go for a chest xray

{Ploome}
good.

352 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:21:32pm

re: #312 Stonemason

Even godless pricks like Pat Condell enjoy Christmas. There's a way to be godless without being a complete asshole.
/Merry X-mas

353 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:21:41pm

re: #342 Jimmah

Most people on the planet belong to the Church of I'm Right.

354 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:22:14pm
355 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:22:20pm

Moonbat advice for a soon to be former president:
Bush must navigate a treacherous post-presidency

"He is a president where people are expecting some kind of repair work," said Julian Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton. "If he just goes on the speaking circuit and focuses his time making huge money, that would only tarnish a presidency that only has a low approval rating."

Instead, Bush is more likely to choose a similar post-presidential path, at least initially, as that of Jimmy Carter, who also left the White House with poor approval ratings, Zelizer said.

Instead of seeking to profit off his years in office, Carter became a globe-trotting humanitarian and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his work promoting social and economic justice.

Oh brother.

356 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:22:21pm
357 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:22:23pm

re: #314 CynicalConservative

I have one kid, now, and am trying to bring him up without him expecting the rest of the family and freinds to spoil him, which they do, shamelessly. I would like him to learn and think for himself. As of right now, at 6, he just wants to know HOW MANY PRESENTS AM I GETTING? I am hoping Catholic School is the way to go.

358 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:22:25pm

re: #335 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Yeah toots, but your weird.

You're the one who is so worried about the "shitty" toys at the end of a cartoon that you go look up the cartoon on wiki, and I'm the one who's weird?

hahahahaha.

359 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:23:02pm

re: #350 Charles


Am I a hate-filled fanatic, or a pretty reasonable guy?


Keep 'em guessing.

360 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:23:09pm

re: #323 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Trying to understand the shitty toys.

Dude, I wish I could wave a wand over you but, I cannot.

361 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:23:19pm

re: #358 reine.de.tout

Not a cartoon. Sheesh.

Really. Goodnight.

362 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:23:34pm

re: #350 Charles

The Fark Kiddies don't know what to think about my stance against the Obama nirth sertifikit lunacy:

[Link: forums.fark.com...]

Am I a hate-filled fanatic, or a pretty reasonable guy? Stay tuned for the next thrilling episode.

It's FARK. In another 2 hours, they'll be trying to figure out whether you're a hate-reasonable guy or a pretty filled fanatic.

363 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:23:47pm

re: #356 ploome hineni

oy

OPI, Malaga Wine..looks different on the nail (3 coats) than in the bottle

heh-heh.
forced it out of you.
Dark red I can wear.
I'll have to look for it next week when I get my nails done.

364 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:23:57pm
365 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:24:15pm

re: #352 Killgore Trout

Even godless pricks like Pat Condell enjoy Christmas. There's a way to be godless without being a complete asshole.
/Merry X-mas

Atheists who don't celebrate Christmas tend to get bitter and acidic this time of year. I celebrate Christmas with a vengeance myself, it's a time of joy for so many, why wouldn't you celebrate with them?

366 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:24:22pm

re: #325 WriterMom

FIRE FIRE! Have mercy!

Suburban 911!

Oh, yes.

367 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:24:33pm

re: #352 Killgore Trout

link not found

368 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:24:55pm
369 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:25:01pm

Pat Condel is overdue for a new video. Maybe he's off for the holidays.

370 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:25:17pm

re: #347 SlartyBartfast

Whenever someone states a person's IQ as some absolute, invariable number they're full of B.S. (And, LoFlyer, I'm not saying you're full of it. Question the source!)

Anyway, it would be more accurate to say, "My IQ has been measured as high as...", but a person's score will vary day-to-day. I've been given the Stanford-Binet standard test at least 4 times...never twice the same score.

Haar mate, it was some Internet add offering to test your IQ, but I noticed that the Democrats were getting the really high IQ scores and the Republicans much lower scores. Personally I will take common sense over genius any day mate!

371 WriterMom  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:25:26pm

re: #366 MandyManners

I'm not clicking. Somehow-I don't think Husband would be thrilled!

372 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:25:35pm

re: #366 MandyManners

Oh, yes.

Why are women attracted to a man who looks like he wants a mirror on the ceiling over the bed so he can look at himself?

373 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:25:39pm

re: #364 ploome hineni

touts

are you fighting with the fat bastard again?

Never fought with him before.
In fact, I don't fight with anybody.
They fight with me.
I stay cool, calm and collected at all times.
No telling who's reading, ya know?

374 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:25:40pm

re: #327 CynicalConservative

Understudy.

It's all about the ascension of the European imperative to force AMERICA to be just like it is.

375 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:26:39pm

re: #316 Salem

Religious people are going to continue to proselytize to others, I don't see why atheists should be regarded as scoundrels for trying to convince people that atheism is correct.

It's all in how they do it.

376 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:26:46pm

re: #341 CynicalConservative

Thank you! I think my 333 in response to Salem's 316 expresses the same sentiment.

{MandyManners}

You take care of you!

377 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:26:51pm

re: #367 Jimmah

Try this: Partying with Baby Jesus

378 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:27:06pm

re: #357 chippy

I have one kid, now, and am trying to bring him up without him expecting the rest of the family and freinds to spoil him, which they do, shamelessly. I would like him to learn and think for himself. As of right now, at 6, he just wants to know HOW MANY PRESENTS AM I GETTING? I am hoping Catholic School is the way to go.

I wish you the best of luck (serious, not facetious). Being one of the non-kid uncle/aunt's in my family, it's been a tough road; for a few years, my sibs "covered" for me (and some still do). As the kids have reached their teens and beyond, they still love and respect me as an older extended family member and haven't held the exercise of my beliefs against me.

379 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:27:14pm

re: #350 Charles

The Fark Kiddies don't know what to think about my stance against the Obama nirth sertifikit lunacy:

[Link: forums.fark.com...]

Am I a hate-filled fanatic, or a pretty reasonable guy? Stay tuned for the next thrilling episode.

Some seem to be really thrown for a loop by the inclusion of your pro-evolution stance.

380 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:27:44pm

The first creationist ("Crusty") just showed up to down-ding this article, as expected. Soon to be followed by Canadian Infidel, DanThePainter, and dcbatlle.

381 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:27:48pm

re: #371 WriterMom

I'm not clicking. Somehow-I don't think Husband would be thrilled!

Oh, click it!
It's worth it.

382 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:27:58pm

re: #355 Kenneth

Moonbat advice for a soon to be former president:
Bush must navigate a treacherous post-presidency


Oh brother.

Buncha' stoopid cock-suckers.

383 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:28:14pm
384 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:28:48pm

re: #369 Killgore Trout

Pat Condel is overdue for a new video. Maybe he's off for the holidays.

What holidays?

385 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:29:03pm

re: #380 Charles

The first creationist ("Crusty") just showed up to down-ding this article, as expected. Soon to be followed by Canadian Infidel, DanThePainter, and dcbatlle.

Come out and post, Trolls! I've got some logic waiting to thump you with!

386 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:29:47pm

re: #372 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Why are women attracted to a man who looks like he wants a mirror on the ceiling over the bed so he can look at himself?

You tell me.

387 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:30:07pm

re: #345 Iron Fist

What I don't understand is why they'd try to convince others. If thety are right, it really doesn't matter. In any way. What are they really trying to accomplish? Saving their non-souls from a non-existant hell?

If this is all there is, I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince anyone of much of anything.

I think that atheists frequently see religion as an impediment to rational thinking and thus any hope that we'll move toward an orderly, progressive future society ("toward" doesn't imply that we'd ever quite get there). I think I felt this way at one time. Now I think it's pretty fruitless to bother to argue much about religion, if I can avoid it. I assume religion will not have diminished significantly in my lifetime, so I might as well turn my attentions to more interesting things. However, some things I can't keep silent on-namely the lunacy of pushing ID on public schools.

388 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:30:16pm

There's actually a trichotomy, art also seems to want to attack science and the "mechanistic/materialistic" universe at times. J. Bronowski had a short dialogue in "Science and Human Values" in which he covered that false trichotomy. He ended the dialogue with this poem:

I, having built a house, reject
The feud of eye and intellect,
And find in my experience proof,
One pleasure runs from root to roof,
One thrust along a streamline arches
The sudden star, the budding larches.

The force that makes the winter grow
Its feathered hexagons of snow,
And drives the bee to match at home,
Their calculated honeycomb,
Is abacus and rose combined.
An icy sweetness fills my mind,

A sense that under thing and wing,
Lies, taut yet living, coiled, the spring.

389 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:30:46pm

re: #365 Thanos

I like Christmas although I don't really make a big deal out of it. It's much more of a cultural thing than a religious thing for me. I bust out my biggest log and throw it in the fire place. I get drunk, read a book and watch tv until the cats wake me up at 4a.m. to throw another log on.

390 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:32:19pm

re: #384 MandyManners

Maybe Pat's doing the Hadj...(the Beeb has got all its reporters dressed up in white robes/tunics...and "reporting" on "events" at Mecca.)

391 Summer Seale  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:33:12pm

Just have to say that Fora.tv rocks. I've been a member since they first started memberships. It's an incredible resource and honestly...probably the best resource for discussions on the web. =)

392 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:33:45pm

re: #365 Thanos

Atheists who don't celebrate Christmas tend to get bitter and acidic this time of year. I celebrate Christmas with a vengeance myself, it's a time of joy for so many, why wouldn't you celebrate with them?

Agreed. It's just too much fun to turn down just because you don't believe the religious aspect of it.

393 Lynn B.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:34:04pm

re: #283 ploome hineni

I, on the other hand, have no birth certificate

{ }

394 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:34:04pm
395 LoFlyer  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:34:05pm

Haar later mates! Thanks for the conversation from all. Charles I looked at the Fark posts and you were actually getting a lot of good compliments mixed in with the moonbat BS. Keep up the good work mate! We appreciate all you do!

396 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:34:18pm

re: #390 J.S.

Maybe Pat's doing the Hadj...(the Beeb has got all its reporters dressed up in white robes/tunics...and "reporting" on "events" at Mecca.)

BBC "Reporter": Well, I for one welcome our new Islamic overlords...

397 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:34:34pm

re: #390 J.S.

Maybe Pat's doing the Hadj...(the Beeb has got all its reporters dressed up in white robes/tunics...and "reporting" on "events" at Mecca.)

Really? That's fucking insane. BBC is an official organ.

398 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:35:08pm

re: #388 Thanos

Very nice indeed!

An icy sweetness fills my mind,


I'm going to take that poem in mind and carry it off to bed. Thanks, and good night.

399 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:35:14pm
400 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:35:16pm

re: #377 Killgore Trout

Try this: Partying with Baby Jesus

Thanks and praise.

401 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:35:41pm

re: #397 MandyManners

BBC is an official organ.

...in more than one sense.

402 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:36:10pm

re: #394 ploome hineni

oh shit

is that yellow thingie his peepee?

LOLOL!
You can't be feeling too bad!
(but see the doc anyhow)

403 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:36:31pm

re: #350 Charles

The Fark Kiddies don't know what to think about my stance against the Obama nirth sertifikit lunacy:

[Link: forums.fark.com...]

Am I a hate-filled fanatic, or a pretty reasonable guy? Stay tuned for the next thrilling episode.

Reap what you sew... LGF

You sew? Making some sweaters for the fam for xmas?

404 Kenneth  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:36:34pm

re: #397 MandyManners

Really? That's fucking insane. BBC is an official organ.

It's not an organ, it's an orifice.

405 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:36:41pm
406 NYCHardhat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:36:54pm

re: #277 MandyManners

CBBHO is no fucking scholar. It's a fucking lie. Don't believe that shit.

You are the best.

407 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:38:09pm

re: #397 MandyManners

Really? That's fucking insane. BBC is an official organ.

An offical male organ, given the dickish way they're acting.

[snicker]

408 NYCHardhat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:38:57pm

re: #380 Charles

The first creationist ("Crusty") just showed up to down-ding this article, as expected. Soon to be followed by Canadian Infidel, DanThePainter, and dcbatlle.

Why the animosity towards creationism? Why the resistance towards evolution. I just don't understand.

409 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:39:01pm

Hey - I'm over 1000 karma now. New avatar too - a little bit more pro-Islam than my last one;)

410 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:39:32pm

Gottta' go for a bit.

411 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:39:39pm

Looks like there was not enough cash in the freezer -

William Jefferson loses seat

412 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:39:52pm

re: #397 MandyManners

I think they (the BBC) is on thin ice, personally...it's obvious that the "reporter" is Muslim and doing all the religious "requirements" for the Hadj...I consider it da'wa...getting the info out there to educate the "un believers."

413 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:40:03pm

re: #409 Jimmah

Hey - I'm over 1000 karma now. New avatar too - a little bit more pro-Islam than my last one;)

Is that Rage Boy I spy on the right of that photo?

414 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:40:08pm

re: #409 Jimmah

Hey - I'm over 1000 karma now. New avatar too - a little bit more pro-Islam than my last one;)

Ha ha, did you make that? It's funny. A lolcat type of caption could be funny too.

415 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:40:24pm

When does the voting for the Idiotarian/anti-Idiotarian begin? This is going to be an interesting year.

416 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:40:35pm

re: #375 swamprat

It's all in how they do it.

But, frequently, both sides are at odds over what constitutes abusiveness in the debate. Where another may see a sacred cows, I may see none. I don't cede that there must be a sacred cow there that I don't see simply because someone else insists there is. After all, if I accept that my neighbor's cow is sacred, how can I protest when it starts grazing on my land?

417 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:41:15pm

re: #409 Jimmah

For some reason that caption makes them look more like football fans.

418 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:41:22pm

re: #380 Charles

The first creationist ("Crusty") just showed up to down-ding this article, as expected. Soon to be followed by Canadian Infidel, DanThePainter, and dcbatlle.

I think Crusty's the guy in the middle of this picture, torn between two worlds.

419 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:41:31pm

re: #415 Killgore Trout

When does the voting for the Idiotarian/anti-Idiotarian begin? This is going to be an interesting year.

I'm going msm/Pat Condell.

420 NYCHardhat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:41:33pm

re: #415 Killgore Trout

When does the voting for the Idiotarian/anti-Idiotarian begin? This is going to be an interesting year.

Idiotarian: The MSM
Anti idiotarian: the 48% of the voting public that did not vote for the one.

421 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:42:08pm

re: #411 karmic_inquisitor

Looks like there was not enough cash in the freezer -

William Jefferson loses seat


Now that is some good news. Think I'll break out the cognac to celebrate.

422 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:42:17pm

re: #411 karmic_inquisitor

Looks like there was not enough cash in the freezer -

William Jefferson loses seat

Oh, interesting!

In the 2nd Congressional district, with 79 percent of precincts reporting, Republican challenger Anh "Joseph" Cao -- an attorney and community organizer -- had 52.9 percent of the vote to Jefferson's 43.2 percent.

A Republican!
Never woulda thunk it could happen

423 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:42:20pm
424 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:42:21pm

OK I sat through about 6 minutes of that crap. Two objections to that infomercial.

First, Alan Jones is being disingenuous and willfully ignorant painting the conflict as being between religious people and scientific people. Ignoring the inconvenient fact that many religious people are not opposed to the science of evolution one bit. A billion or so Catholics do not consider Genesis the literal account of creation. I'm sure many other Christians agree with that. This argument can not be boiled down to saying religion is opposed to evolution. Jones is either telling a lie on purpose or because he's too lazy to do 5 minutes of research.

Second, Kevin Padian is an idiot if he really thinks Christian fundamentalism is just as dangerous as Muslim fundamentalism and nuclear bombs. C'mon. He may be a genius at analyzing dinosaur bones, but he's a moron when it comes to analyzing history and current events.

That interview was a circle jerk.

425 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:42:34pm
426 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:43:47pm

re: #413 Dark_Falcon

It is indeed!

427 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:43:53pm

re: #423 ploome hineni

touts

just read the email

some of us do not have that problem

Hope you got a laugh.
Hope you got a laugh that didn't set off a coughing fit.

428 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:43:57pm

re: #419 Sharmuta

I might vote Pat for this year but Ayaan Hrisi Ali deserves it for achievements past. It's going to be a tough call.

429 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:44:21pm

re: #425 gmsc

OT: bosforus shot! CSI investigates!
;)

Ha ha! Guess it's time to change the ol' avatar!

430 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:44:50pm
431 Killgore Trout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:45:43pm

re: #428 Killgore Trout

There's also Geert Wilders.

432 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:46:00pm

re: #429 bosforus

Ha ha! Guess it's time to change the ol' avatar!

Nah, not until after Christmas, at least.

433 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:46:31pm

re: #428 Killgore Trout

I'm going with Pat- one guy with a video camera taking on the ROP. You go, Pat.

434 Lynn B.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:46:59pm

Of course, here comes the equivalence factor. All "fundamentalists" are alike, and they're the "real threat of the 21st century," whether they be Christian or Muslim or atheist or Zionist ... "these are people who can't get along with the rest of us." This is

This is where the thinking gets muddle-headed. There are many Christian fundamentalists who are pro-science and not creationists and who aren't a threat to anybody. I'm not sure what a fundamentalist atheist is, but ok, there are those who would like to see religion eliminated from public consciousness altogether. Fundamentalist Zionists are, I'm sure, a huge threat to ... fundamentalist Islamists, but beyond that?

435 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:47:02pm

re: #424 mich-again

I didn't hear any of that in that interview.

436 Moody leo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:47:22pm

re: #411 karmic_inquisitor I have been watching that race along with the one up in NW La. I voted for Fleming(R) in the NW La one and he has tentatively won by 356 votes against Carmouche(D)
Carmouche hasn't conceded because he is waiting for provisional ballots to be counted.

437 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:47:26pm

re: #432 gmsc

Nah, not until after Christmas, at least.

I'm going to look for a Jimmy Stewart right now.

438 NYCHardhat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:47:42pm

re: #430 Iron Fist

Yeah, I absolutely hate the people who claim that the Religious Right are just like the Taliban. Makes me want to throw them off of a building or something.

Someone tell me...what is wrong with the belief of a higher power? What is wrong with the belief of evolution?

439 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:47:52pm

re: #414 bosforus

I didn't make that one, no. It was a person on an atheist site I occasionally post on. We did a few on the theme of rage boy.This was my contribution:

Image: Cloneofrageboy3.jpg

440 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:47:55pm

re: #430 Iron Fist

I don't care enough about them to hate them.

441 Karridine  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:49:27pm

Slartybart, in agreement and to emphasize, assume for the moment that Jesus was infilled with All-Knowledge, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise...

He COULD have given us new commandments-

A new commandment do I give thee, that shouldst refrain from creating internal combustion engines with hydrocarbon emissions in excess of 17 parts per million. This is the word of God.

Right, the disciples respond, but uh, what is an internal? and what's a combustion? what does 'engine' mean? What is a hydrocarbon? How long is an emission? What is a part per million?

-but such assertions of the Holy Intermediary of God not only imply imperfection in bringing what He DID, to the people who heard and followed Him, when He brought it, but also exhibit serious ignorance about the intellectual-emotional needs of humans and human society, and especially HOW THOSE NEEDS EVOLVE over time!

442 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:49:28pm

re: #424 mich-again

First, Alan Jones is being disingenuous and willfully ignorant painting the conflict as being between religious people and scientific people.

First- I don't think he meant it to be taken as all religious people.

Second- it's certainly not non-religious people working to undermine science and evolution.

443 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:50:01pm

Most Americans are religious and it's worked out pretty good so far. Notice that there haven't been any religious wars in this country, outside the occasional legal or academic battle. As long as freedom from religion is maintained, freedom of religion shouldn't be an issue.

444 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:50:13pm

re: #438 NYCHardhat

Someone tell me...what is wrong with the belief of a higher power? What is wrong with the belief of evolution?

Nothing's wrong with the belief in a higher power as long as it's personal and not used as an attack on someone else.

Nothing's wrong with an understanding of evolution as long as it's not treated as a religion.

445 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:52:26pm

re: #431 Killgore Trout

There's also Geert Wilders.

Does he still want to ban the Koran?

446 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:52:34pm
447 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:52:49pm

re: #443 Salem

Most Americans are religious and it's worked out pretty good so far. Notice that there haven't been any religious wars in this country, outside the occasional legal or academic battle. As long as freedom from religion is maintained, freedom of religion shouldn't be an issue.

Very well said. I'm one of the "not religious" but respect your religious beliefs as long as you're not trying to convert me. As said previously, belief is a very personal, not institutional, thing.

448 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:52:54pm

re: #411 karmic_inquisitor

Looks like there was not enough cash in the freezer -

William Jefferson loses seat

Beaten by a Republican "Community Organizer". Oh, the irony.

449 NYCHardhat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:53:07pm

re: #444 CynicalConservative

Nothing's wrong with the belief in a higher power as long as it's personal and not used as an attack on someone else.

Nothing's wrong with an understanding of evolution as long as it's not treated as a religion.

I agree. I just can't stand when others look on a person of faith with contempt. (Bill Maher does this all the time) I don't force my spiritual beliefs on anyone.

450 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:53:24pm

re: #443 Salem

Most Americans are religious and it's worked out pretty good so far. Notice that there haven't been any religious wars in this country, outside the occasional legal or academic battle. As long as freedom from religion is maintained, freedom of religion shouldn't be an issue.

BINGO.

451 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:53:27pm

re: #438 NYCHardhat

Someone tell me...what is wrong with the belief of a higher power?

Here's an interesting discussion on the matter, that can perhaps act as food for further discussion:

Q: I have been in an ongoing discussion with a friend regarding belief in a higher, supernatural being. After many conversations, it finally became clear his true reasoning for believing: he believes that humans are essentially base, murderous, thieving, pillaging thugs, and so we must convince people to believe in a God for anthropological reasons, i.e., to get them to behave in a moral manner. He pointed out that when men believe that man is the higher arbiter of morality, we end up with "supermen" dictators such as Hitler, Stalin or Mao, as emerged in atheistic societies. What do you think about this line of reasoning?

A: It's ironic that people who do believe in God are considered idealistic when what lies at the root of their "idealistic" belief are the kinds of ideas about human beings that your friend openly acknowledges. It's equally ironic that people who do not believe in God are considered cynical and hard. Actually, refusing to believe in a mystical approach to morality forces one to look at what, objectively speaking, the good life requires. This rational kind of inquiry requires intellectual honesty and a full focus on reality. It presupposes that even though man does not necessarily act in a moral manner, man can and should act in a moral manner -- provided we become clear about what precisely a "moral manner" is. We can’t escape into a supernatural realm in order to groan, "if only." We have to look at what is and then posit an ideal, moral approach from there.

Surrendering the issue of morality to some higher authority in heaven will sooner or later encourage some sort of "superman" -- be he Communist, socialist, terrorist, Democrat or Republican -- to take over all or part of our lives. Communists, socialists and Democrats, in varying degrees, stress the supremacy of society over the individual. Republicans and terrorists, in varying degrees, stress the supremacy of a Supreme God and religious institutions over the individual. (George W. Bush stresses the superiority of both society and religion over the individual). Only a rational, secular approach to morality and man can lead to placing the right and dignity of the human individual above all other powers -- real or imaginary.

452 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:54:10pm

re: #446 Iron Fist

Hate is pretty easy for me.

Why?

453 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:54:13pm

re: #449 NYCHardhat

I agree. I just can't stand when others look on a person of faith with contempt. (Bill Maher does this all the time) I don't force my spiritual beliefs on anyone.

As it should be.

454 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:54:45pm

re: #442 Sharmuta

First- I don't think he meant it to be taken as all religious people.

Second- it's certainly not non-religious people working to undermine science and evolution.

And third - what I heard in the discussion was a very specific and limited discussion about what is "dangerous" to the science education of our kids, and that would be those who wish to substitute a philosophical discussion of religion for the teaching of science.

455 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:55:44pm

re: #446 Iron Fist

Hate is pretty easy for me.

Hate in my experience takes more energy than anything else.

456 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:57:01pm

re: #454 reine.de.tout

I liked the point that was raised about an interventionist God being a danger to theology too. Very good discussion, and I hope Mich takes another crack at it.

457 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:57:31pm

re: #442 Sharmuta

Second- it's certainly not non-religious people working to undermine science and evolution.

hmmm...I'm not so sure that I agree with that last statement...A while ago (over a year?) someone linked to a conference -- and the conference was about atheism and science...and these were all (imo) fanatics. There was Patricia Churchland (do you know who she is?), insisting that the atheist's "line" MUST get out their message to the public -- do advertisements, etc. There were other "scientists" (?) exclaiming that having done a survey and discovered (o the shock, o the horror) that X number of scientists were not atheists, was just too much and something had to done! They really did sound like crack-pots...(I'll have to search for that link...)...like a mirror of some sort of tribunal conducting an inquisition...and demanding 100 percent adherence to a single point of view, or else...(that's hardly a "scientific" orientation.)

458 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:57:35pm

re: #442 Sharmuta

First- I don't think he meant it to be taken as all religious people.

I disagree. He pointed out the religion versus science theme more than once without acknowledging that point. There was a reason he left that out.

459 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:57:45pm

ElBaradei "World failed to stop Iran".

Evidently it is the world's fault and in no way his.

Asshole.

460 greggriffith  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:58:09pm

FWIW, Alan Jones in a loon. In his book "Reimagining Christianity," for example, he writes of his ideal vision of Christianity as the baby Jesus being held in the Buddha's arms. The guy is completely out to lunch, and cannot present a view of anything as understood by Christians, or, for that matter, Buddhists either.

461 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:58:15pm

Meanwhile, in the Ebert/Ben Stein thread, we still have people trying to dishonestly tie Darwinian evolution with Adolf Hitler.

They love to post on dead threads, to try to get the last word.

462 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:58:27pm
463 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:58:33pm

re: #433 Sharmuta

I'm going with Pat- one guy with a video camera taking on the ROP. You go, Pat.

Me too. Geert is too extreme in his rhetoric.

464 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:58:52pm

re: #457 J.S.

Are they trying to undermine evolutionary teachings?

465 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:59:11pm

re: #437 bosforus

I'm going to look for a Jimmy Stewart right now.

Done.
I wish I had a million dollars...hot dog!

466 ahaygood  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:59:41pm

marxism as a tool? Karl Marx is a tool?

The first question is actually kind of serious... does anybody understand what the man is referring to when he describes marxism as a tool?

467 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 8:59:54pm

re: #436 Moody leo

I have been watching that race along with the one up in NW La. I voted for Fleming(R) in the NW La one and he has tentatively won by 356 votes against Carmouche(D)
Carmouche hasn't conceded because he is waiting for provisional ballots to be counted.

Papers were reporting Carmouche ahead last time I checked. Great news that Fleming is winning. Wonder if Franken's crack team will arrive to "help things out".

468 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:00:04pm

re: #436 Moody leo

I have been watching that race along with the one up in NW La. I voted for Fleming(R) in the NW La one and he has tentatively won by 356 votes against Carmouche(D)
Carmouche hasn't conceded because he is waiting for provisional ballots to be counted.

He made up that 3% gap? Impressive. If so, that's good news. The challenge will be keeping Jefferson's seat now that we've booted him from it.

469 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:00:10pm

re: #462 Iron Fist

It's a rather long tale. It's useful, would be the simplest answer.


Can you respond to a blue nic in a short time?

470 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:00:23pm

re: #461 Charles

Meanwhile, in the Ebert/Ben Stein thread, we still have people trying to dishonestly tie Darwinian evolution with Adolf Hitler.

They love to post on dead threads, to try to get the last word.

Why people can't look up Ernst Haeckel, William Sumner and Vladmir Ulyanov is beyond me.

471 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:00:26pm

re: #456 Sharmuta

No thanks. I heard enough in the first 6 minutes.

472 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:00:57pm

re: #461 Charles

Meanwhile, in the Ebert/Ben Stein thread, we still have people trying to dishonestly tie Darwinian evolution with Adolf Hitler.

They love to post on dead threads, to try to get the last word.

Hitler is Darwin's love child. I read it on the Internet so it is true.

473 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:00:58pm

re: #416 Salem

But, frequently, both sides are at odds over what constitutes abusiveness in the debate. Where another may see a sacred cows, I may see none. I don't cede that there must be a sacred cow there that I don't see simply because someone else insists there is. After all, if I accept that my neighbor's cow is sacred, how can I protest when it starts grazing on my land?

True enough. To some, (on either side!) just putting out a point to which the other side has no retort constitutes an act of war. And how can one be responsible for another's lack of resource?

474 reine.de.tout  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:01:24pm

re: #456 Sharmuta

I liked the point that was raised about an interventionist God being a danger to theology too. Very good discussion, and I hope Mich takes another crack at it.

Yes, I hope he listens again, and then listens to the full interview.

475 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:01:58pm
476 MandyManners  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:01:59pm

Good night!

477 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:02:09pm

re: #457 J.S.

I think I posted the link to that conference. Seriously, you can accuse them of talking about undermining religion, but undermining science? C'mon.

478 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:02:27pm

re: #465 bosforus

Done.
I wish I had a million dollars...hot dog!

It looks good!

Where did you find a photo of Jimmy Stewart so cheaply?

At a Clarence sale!

479 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:02:29pm

A Question for all...

A friend of mine is somewhat of a "wheel". One of his benefits as VP is that he gets a car paid for by the company. If he buys a car, the company will reimburse him for it (100%). If he pays for it on time, the company will pay for the car plus interest.

So, what does he do? He went out and leased a 2009 Lexus.

Hello?

Is it me, or is this blatantly stupid?

Someone tell me what I am missing...

Please.

480 NYCHardhat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:03:08pm

re: #479 windhorse

A Question for all...

A friend of mine is somewhat of a "wheel". One of his benefits as VP is that he gets a car paid for by the company. If he buys a car, the company will reimburse him for it (100%). If he pays for it on time, the company will pay for the car plus interest.

So, what does he do? He went out and leased a 2009 Lexus.

Hello?

Is it me, or is this blatantly stupid?

Someone tell me what I am missing...

Please.

That makes no sense.

481 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:03:15pm

re: #478 gmsc

It looks good!

Where did you find a photo of Jimmy Stewart so cheaply?

At a Clarence sale!

It's a Wonderful Life puns? I'm in!
Yeah, I could Bailey afford it.

482 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:03:19pm

re: #460 greggriffith

The guy is completely out to lunch, and cannot present a view of anything as understood by Christians, or, for that matter, Buddhists either.

You know, I did not know that. But its obvious after a few minutes of watching and listening to him. He has a snarky contempt for religion and just wears that costume to mock.

483 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:04:08pm

re: #472 karmic_inquisitor

Hitler is Darwin's love child. I read it on the Internet so it is true.

Does that mean that Hitler is Josiah Wedgwood's great-grand-love-child?

484 Gorf  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:04:16pm

good nite Mandy!

485 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:04:19pm

Nite all, great discussions tonight. Surprised at lack of trolls and meltdowns on this thread as I facetiously referenced in the early 40's of this thread.

486 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:04:29pm

re: #464 Sharmuta

They're undermining science (and free inquiry), and thus, inadvertently giving certain parties (ID people, for example) opportunities to advance their "cause"...so in a round about way, indirectly, the answer is "yes." (I think this is inherent in most forms of fanaticism -- the other side benefits.)

487 pixelman  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:04:44pm

"If man evolved from apes - why do we still have apes."
-George Carlin

488 Moody Leo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:04:54pm

re: #468 Dark_Falcon
Isn't that the truth.

489 ahaygood  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:03pm

re: #82 notutopia

huh?
what do gradients of Fascism and political science have to do with testing of scientific theory?
How is marxism and the ideological marxism the crux of the debate?

490 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:13pm

re: #480 NYCHardhat

thank you for your response...

491 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:17pm

re: #479 windhorse

A Question for all...

A friend of mine is somewhat of a "wheel". One of his benefits as VP is that he gets a car paid for by the company. If he buys a car, the company will reimburse him for it (100%). If he pays for it on time, the company will pay for the car plus interest.

So, what does he do? He went out and leased a 2009 Lexus.

Hello?

Is it me, or is this blatantly stupid?

Someone tell me what I am missing...

Please.

He may be looking at a tax right-off.

Or he may be a little clue-less.

492 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:19pm

re: #378 CynicalConservative

Sounds like you have a family that is realistic and understanding. I will continue the fight for more giving and less receiving, i'm trying now to get them all involved in something, however small, to make the whole thing more meaningful. THANKS for letting me vent...

493 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:22pm

re: #461 Charles

Meanwhile, in the Ebert/Ben Stein thread, we still have people trying to dishonestly tie Darwinian evolution with Adolf Hitler.

They love to post on dead threads, to try to get the last word.

So, if a creationist tool posts on a dead thread and nobody reads it, is he still stupid?

-Yes

494 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:23pm

I was raised in a oddly religious household.

My mother was a deeply religious person, who practiced the Jehovah Witness faith. When I went, I went to a Kingdom Hall.

My father had no religion. I wouldn't go so far as to say he didn't believe in God, he must have. He called on God with distressing regularity to damn this, that, or the other.

But one of my proudest memories of my father happened at my brother's funeral. Bo had been killed in a biker flareup out in Califorinia, and the body brought back to AR to be buried where generations of my family are. What once had been a family graveyard had morphed into a small plot where locals were buried and a fire-and-brimstone church had been built. The pastor led the service, and during the service asked that everone there agree to read the bible. All except my father held up their hands to signify agreement.

The pastor made the mistake of singling out my Dad and asking, "Brother razorbacker's Dad, why isn't your hand up?"

Dad replied, "Because I'm not going to read the damned bible, and I'm not going to lie here in church and say that I will."

The pastor was nonplussed for a moment, then said, "An honest answer to an intrusive question. I apologize for asking."

The pastor and Dad became friends. Just not that kind of friends.

495 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:40pm

The editorial board of the Chicago Tribune has taken a bold and brave stance. They think that Syria should not get a nuclear weapon. Next week, the editors plan to say that AIDS is bad.

496 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:05:40pm
497 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:06:41pm

re: #487 pixelman

"If man evolved from apes - why do we still have apes."
-George Carlin

Who ever said we evolved from apes? I mean, who besides creationists and IDiots.

498 Salem  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:07:09pm

re: #473 swamprat

True enough. To some, (on either side!) just putting out a point to which the other side has no retort constitutes an act of war. And how can one be responsible for another's lack of resource?

Well, it certainly is hard to ague with "God did it".

499 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:07:27pm

Well, I've gotta run. Till next time lizards!

500 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:07:54pm

re: #496 Iron Fist


What escapes me is that at the end of the lease period, he has nothing to show for it... whereas... if he bought the car, he would at least have something to show for it...

I guess I just don't run drive in the right circles...

501 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:07:59pm

re: #483 gmsc

Does that mean that Hitler is Josiah Wedgwood's great-grand-love-child?

Well now that you have posted it, it must be true because it is now on the Internet.

BTW - did you hear that Obama is going to give every child in the US broadband? Isn't that great?

/

502 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:08:08pm

re: #481 bosforus

It's a Wonderful Life puns? I'm in!
Yeah, I could Bailey afford it.

As in Mary Bailey? Wasn't she a bush supporter?
;)

503 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:08:11pm

re: #486 J.S.

Nope. The scientists and philosophers at that conference were talking about promoting atheism. I can see how that is anti-religious - but anti-scientific? Give us a break!

504 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:08:13pm
505 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:08:31pm

re: #499 bosforus

Well, I've gotta run. Till next time lizards!

Good night!

506 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:08:54pm

re: #502 gmsc

As in Mary Bailey? Wasn't she a bush supporter?
;)

Ha ha, what we have here is a very interesting situation. OK, for reals, gotta run.

507 Lynn B.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:09:04pm

re: #435 reine.de.tout

I didn't hear any of that in that interview.

Starting at about 7:08 there's a blatant equivalence of all "fundamentalists" as being the greatest threat facing the 21st century. An overly broad brush, I'd say.

There's also a disturbing comment by Rev. Jones in there somewhere that I'm trying to find again to the effect that science doesn't have the answers to anything he cares about. That's just odd.

Overall, a fascinating and enlightening exchange, though.

508 CynicalConservative  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:09:10pm

re: #492 chippy

Sounds like you have a family that is realistic and understanding. I will continue the fight for more giving and less receiving, i'm trying now to get them all involved in something, however small, to make the whole thing more meaningful. THANKS for letting me vent...

S'All good. I do have a very understanding family in general (after several years of battles (conversations) back and forth). My best advice is to stand for what you believe in and don't be afraid to pause or sever ties with those who won't respect what you believe. It's always harder with family but if the love is truly there the acceptance will come.

509 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:09:15pm

Depreciation and tax deductions make leasing company vehicles a better choice for the business than buying them outright.

510 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:09:36pm

re: #479 windhorse


maybe a limit on what he could spend? wanted the lexus but couldn't afford the payment unless he leased?

511 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:09:46pm

re: #461 Charles

Meanwhile, in the Ebert/Ben Stein thread, we still have people trying to dishonestly tie Darwinian evolution with Adolf Hitler.

They love to post on dead threads, to try to get the last word.

You should consider setting up some kind of bot where the last post of a thread always reads

'Idjits'

'bound to apply somewhere in the thread.

512 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:09:48pm

re: #479 windhorse

A Question for all...

A friend of mine is somewhat of a "wheel". One of his benefits as VP is that he gets a car paid for by the company. If he buys a car, the company will reimburse him for it (100%). If he pays for it on time, the company will pay for the car plus interest.

So, what does he do? He went out and leased a 2009 Lexus.

Hello?

Is it me, or is this blatantly stupid?

Someone tell me what I am missing...

Please.


If he owns the car it is taxable
if he deals drugs breaks the law it may be confiscated
If he is sued it may be taken

513 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:10:15pm

re: #501 karmic_inquisitor

Well now that you have posted it, it must be true because it is now on the Internet.

BTW - did you hear that Obama is going to give every child in the US broadband? Isn't that great?

/

Sounds good to me! Now, concerning the particular broads I'd like in my band . . .

514 bosforus  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:10:30pm

re: #506 bosforus

Ha ha, what we have here is a very interesting situation. OK, for reals, gotta run.

You know, because she ended up naked in that bush. It worked on two levels. Srsly this time. Bye!

515 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:10:50pm

re: #513 gmsc

Sounds good to me! Now, concerning the particular broads I'd like in my band . . .

I have heard of child brides, but child broads?

516 ahaygood  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:10:58pm

Padian claims that there is no such thing as atheism parading as science? there goes any illusion that he is objective.

517 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:11:12pm

re: #509 jaunte

I guess that's why I only got a B in Econ...

518 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:11:47pm

Hey y'all - are we still pretty much ON Topic or have we drifted away some?

519 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:11pm

re: #517 windhorse

The tax laws result in a lot of strange distortions.

520 [deleted]  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:14pm
521 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:20pm

Speaking of child brides ...

What ever happened to our poster named Aisha? Was/Is she a sock puppet? Of a banned person?

522 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:22pm

re: #503 Jimmah

It went beyond promotion of atheism and threatened freedom of expression. (Very similar, btw, to the "speech codes" for students being implemented at certain universities.) Such diktats are contrary to the very meaning of the word "university."

523 Wishing  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:22pm

re: #507 Lynn B.

Starting at about 7:08 there's a blatant equivalence of all "fundamentalists" as being the greatest threat facing the 21st century. An overly broad brush, I'd say.

There's also a disturbing comment by Rev. Jones in there somewhere that I'm trying to find again to the effect that science doesn't have the answers to anything he cares about. That's just odd.

Overall, a fascinating and enlightening exchange, though.

Agree: the equivalence between christian fundamentalists and Islamic fundamentalists was WAY over the top. The same thing happens with the *cycle of violence* in Israel and MSM drawing that same kind of equivalence. Scary, imo.

524 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:25pm

re: #512 swamprat


I guess for the really wealthy, everything is a liability...

525 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:28pm

re: #518 realwest

Hey y'all - are we still pretty much ON Topic or have we drifted away some?

yes

526 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:12:52pm

re: #518 realwest

Hey y'all - are we still pretty much ON Topic or have we drifted away some?

I'm bored. Wanna talk smack about the Geek Squad?

527 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:13:04pm

re: #495 karmic_inquisitor

The editorial board of the Chicago Tribune has taken a bold and brave stance. They think that Syria should not get a nuclear weapon. Next week, the editors plan to say that AIDS is bad.

To be fair, they do talk about just how useless ElBaradei is, though I think they miss the point. To him, as well as most Egyptians, a Syrian nuke is ok if used against Israel. ElBaradei is most likely acting out of Jew-Hatred. That makes him a malfactor, a much worse thing than a fool.

528 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:13:23pm

re: #518 realwest

Hey y'all - are we still pretty much ON Topic or have we drifted away some?

re: #519 jaunte

The tax laws result in a lot of strange distortions.

I think that answers that question!

529 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:13:29pm

re: #512 swamprat

If he owns the car it is taxable

Hunh?

530 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:13:51pm

re: #527 Dark_Falcon

To be fair, they do talk about just how useless ElBaradei is, though I think they miss the point. To him, as well as most Egyptians, a Syrian nuke is ok if used against Israel. ElBaradei is most likely acting out of Jew-Hatred. That makes him a malfactor, a much worse thing than a fool.

Agree.

531 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:14:16pm

re: #520 Iron Fist
Uh, well yeah - see, if y'all go to the top of the page, Charles has a video which for some reason won't play for me about evolution, creationism, science and faith!

532 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:15:06pm

Not that this has anything to do with creationism or evolution, but it's a good read:

Rudyard Kipling's The Village That Voted the Earth was Flat

[Link: www.online-literature.com...]

533 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:15:10pm

re: #525 Syrah OK - just checking!

534 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:15:41pm

re: #531 realwest


that's alright... just as long as you don't have anyone buy you a car...

:)

535 Aye Pod  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:16:16pm

re: #522 J.S.

It went beyond promotion of atheism and threatened freedom of expression. (Very similar, btw, to the "speech codes" for students being implemented at certain universities.) Such diktats are contrary to the very meaning of the word "university."

It did no such thing, unless my memory serves me very poorly indeed at this moment, and I don't think it does. I will look for the link tomorrow.

Anyway, It's late here - I gotta go. Catch y'all later.

536 NYCHardhat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:16:58pm

Heavy eyelids. Goodnight folks.

537 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:17:13pm

re: #526 razorbacker
Uh, according to Syrah at #525 we are still on topic, but I wouldn't talk smack about 'em anyway cause they are delivering, installing, setting up and data transferring to my NEW computer tomorrow afternoon and I wouldn't want them to hear about me saying how relatively speaking inept they've been with THIS computer! LOL!

538 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:17:14pm

re: #519 jaunte

even if he leases the car, the money paid from the company for the car/maintenance/gas is taxable to him as a fringe benefit. He should have bought it, at least he would own it at the end.

539 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:17:34pm

Lookie here - just found this gem.

Sources: Spies confirm Syrian nuke effort - UPI

A bit of caution - UPI cites DEBKA in it as a source

540 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:17:45pm

re: #503 Jimmah

Someone who is absolutely convinced that there is no creator is on the same shaky logical ground as someone who is absolutely convinced that there is one. In the absence of proof, doubt is reasonable.

541 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:18:02pm

More hate mail:

It is sad to me that LGF is becoming a one subject blog. Your rabid
support for all things Darwin and the Theory of evolution verses
creation is becoming nauseating. Your readers get your point, YOU
DON’T BELEVE IN GOD OR CREATION! You don’t have to piss about
it everyday. People that believe in Creation are not going to change
there minds ever! You’re no one to them and you have yet to
explain how evolution can occur without a universe. (Evolution is a
secondary event) Anyway I find myself visiting your site less and less
due to your vendetta against my equally valid universal model. I know
it’s your blog to do as you please with, but I suspect it is also
your business and therefore I am essentially a customer that has been
run out of your store.

542 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:18:27pm

re: #487 pixelman

"If man evolved from apes - why do we still have apes."
-George Carlin

Because what actually happened is that apes and humans evolutionarily diverged from common ancestors.

543 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:18:50pm

re: #534 windhorse
Um, what?
If anyone wants to buy me a new car, I'll take it! Course since I can't drive anymore, I'd just sell it and take the money!
Can we make it NOT a Ford, GM or Chrysler though?!

544 Wishing  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:18:54pm

christian muslim atheist and zionism are the four *funbdamentalisms* that Padian talks about.
Ok...how do you spot an atheist fundamentalist?

545 karmic_inquisitor  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:19:02pm

re: #541 Charles

Rabid.

546 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:20:15pm

re: #521 karmic_inquisitor

Speaking of child brides ...

What ever happened to our poster named Aisha? Was/Is she a sock puppet? Of a banned person?

Its the hajj. She is off to Mecca to find a husband.

547 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:20:21pm

re: #529 LeePro
gift tax. outrageous

548 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:20:24pm

Watched the video to check out the hair. I think he's trying to copy Martyn in the University of Nottingham element videos.

[Link: www.periodicvideos.com...]

549 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:20:45pm

re: #537 realwest

Uh, according to Syrah at #525 we are still on topic, but I wouldn't talk smack about 'em anyway cause they are delivering, installing, setting up and data transferring to my NEW computer tomorrow afternoon and I wouldn't want them to hear about me saying how relatively speaking inept they've been with THIS computer! LOL!

Understood.

I've read with bemusement your hoop-jumping in order to get BB to honor their warranty. I went through a similar exercise to get them to give me a new laptop once.

That's how I became the owner of my now broken HP Pavillion ze5375us. I'd still like to find someone reliable to install a new power supply into it.

550 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:22:11pm

re: #541 Charles Gee, ya know Charles I come out here just about everyday and I could swear you don't have an ID/Creationsist post but once in a while.
And I've been paying attention, too!
Why don't you tell 'em that when the Discovery Institute and others stop trying to teach creationism as science in public schools, maybe you'll stop posting threads about it?
Just a suggestion, ya understand - not telling ya what to post or anything like that!

551 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:22:12pm

re: #544 Wishing

christian muslim atheist and zionism are the four *funbdamentalisms* that Padian talks about.
Ok...how do you spot an atheist fundamentalist?

He says, "Dog dammit!" ?

552 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:22:17pm

re: #542 Salamantis

Because what actually happened is that apes and humans evolutionarily diverged from common ancestors.

Curious. What were the common ancestors?

553 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:22:21pm

It's amazing how many of the people who send me hate mail about creationism also mention the Obama nirth sertifikit. The one above didn't, but I'm looking through my 'Abuse' folder and there are at least three others that also hate me because I won't put on the tin foil hat.

554 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:22:49pm

re: #537 realwest

Uh, according to Syrah at #525 we are still on topic, but I wouldn't talk smack about 'em anyway cause they are delivering, installing, setting up and data transferring to my NEW computer tomorrow afternoon and I wouldn't want them to hear about me saying how relatively speaking inept they've been with THIS computer! LOL!

There hasn't been a word about turtles on this thread, so I think it would liven things up a bit to "talk Smack" about the geek squaders.

Old machines are sometimes not worth the money or the effort to repair. I buy and rebuild old systems from internet auctions. Some are worth fussing with. Some are really only good and useful as boat anchors or door stops.

Will you be installing Vista on your new machine?

555 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:23:01pm

re: #541 Charles

...but not so fulfilled with life that he/she cannot help but to write you a stupid email. Again, another example of the email saying far more about the author than about you Charles.

Garachkey!

556 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:23:20pm

re: #516 ahaygood

Padian claims that there is no such thing as atheism parading as science? there goes any illusion that he is objective.

Well, it's blindingly obvious that there is such a thing as theism parading as science; it's called ID.

557 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:23:47pm

re: #507 Lynn B.

Starting at about 7:08 there's a blatant equivalence of all "fundamentalists" as being the greatest threat facing the 21st century. An overly broad brush, I'd say.

Indeed. Padian refers to atheists and scientists as having their "fundmentalists" too.

I suppose we'd best all meet in the mushy middle, then, where Christians and atheists agree to disagree, Muslims only cut our heads halfway off.

558 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:24:04pm

re: #548 EmmmieG

Watched the video to check out the hair. I think he's trying to copy Martyn in the University of Nottingham element videos.

Nope. The asshat with the silver lettuce was a James Traficant wannabe.

559 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:24:27pm

re: #549 razorbacker

Understood.

I've read with bemusement your hoop-jumping in order to get BB to honor their warranty. I went through a similar exercise to get them to give me a new laptop once.

That's how I became the owner of my now broken HP Pavillion ze5375us. I'd still like to find someone reliable to install a new power supply into it.

You can pick up a power supply for that computer for about 40 dollars, one that is actually over spec for that model, at that price.

It really only takes about 20 minutes to install. All the plugs are keyed and each device has a different shaped plug. You really can't plug the wrong power into the wrong device.

And if you really worry, then make a diagram as you remove the old power supply and it's cables.

560 chippy  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:24:54pm

re: #554 Syrah


See #59

561 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:24:59pm

re: #537 realwest

Uh, according to Syrah at #525 we are still on topic...

Ummm. No. You asked an either/or question. She answered "yes."

562 Wishing  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:25:32pm

BTW...turtles are mentioned in this topic...Some gal that Padian knows discovered the *turtle shell* gene.
Will this mean new frames for the eyeglasses?

563 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:26:53pm

re: #553 Charles

The "nirth certificat" fetish is based on an emotional need for a magic solution. Occam's razor just won't do.

564 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:28:01pm

re: #560 chippy

See #59

I stand corrected. I missed that.

Everything is now right with the world.

565 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:28:08pm

re: #554 Syrah
Ah, well it's coming with Vista pre-installed - I searched high and low to get an XP and coudn't find one, but as replacements go, this one's pretty good, spec wise anyway - it's an HP - Pavilion
Desktop with Intel. Pentium. Dual-Core Processor E5200 (Model: a6620f %P% SKU: 9062373)
Intel. Pentium. Dual-Core processor E5220; 4GB DDR2 SDRAM; DL DVD1RW/CD-RW
drive; LightScribe labeling; 500GB hard drive; Windows Vista Home Premium
64-bit with SP1
500 gig HD.
I know what the DVD RW/CD-RW are and the 4 gigs of ram and the 500 gigs HD, but have no clue what a LightScribe labeling is, and have never had a VISTA before.
But, Best Buy did give me full credit on my purchase price of this computer (which I bought about 22 months ago) and I thought that was fair.

566 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:28:15pm

I want to know why any church would even hold a conference like this. It's a freckin' church. If you want to teach or preach or look into ID or creationism, then do it.

But keep the scientist off your pulpits and we'll keep the priests out of our classroom.

567 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:28:18pm

re: #563 Syrah

Occam's razor just won't do.

They just don't have much experience with that, as they're not allowed sharp objects...

568 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:28:43pm

re: #559 Walter L. Newton

You can pick up a power supply for that computer for about 40 dollars, one that is actually over spec for that model, at that price.

It really only takes about 20 minutes to install. All the plugs are keyed and each device has a different shaped plug. You really can't plug the wrong power into the wrong device.

And if you really worry, then make a diagram as you remove the old power supply and it's cables.

While I've successfully replaced the hard drive, and upped the RAM, I confess to being unsure about how to open the case. And that seems to be necessary.

569 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:28:44pm

re: #547 swamprat

gift tax. outrageous

OK, but a one-time whack. Not ongoing.

570 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:28:48pm
571 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:29:01pm

re: #563 Syrah

The "nirth certificat" fetish is based on an emotional need for a magic solution. Occam's razor just won't do.

I like watching the "nirth certificat" fetishists. Monday should be fun, when the Supreme Court announces whether they're taking up the cases.

572 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:29:23pm

re: #552 mich-again

Curious. What were the common ancestors?

We know from comparing human and chimpanzee artifactual retroviral DNA sequences that they lived around 5 million years ago. Which means that Lucy, an Australopithecus Afarensus who lived around 2 1/2 million years ago, was on our side after the split.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

573 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:30:11pm

re: #553 Charles

It's amazing how many of the people who send me hate mail about creationism also mention the Obama nirth sertifikit. The one above didn't, but I'm looking through my 'Abuse' folder and there are at least three others that also hate me because I won't put on the tin foil hat.

Well, if they're wearing tin foil hats, just ask them: What's the Frequency, Kenneth?

574 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:30:41pm

re: #561 LeePro
Um, yes, I asked are we still on topic and she said "Yes".

575 Karridine  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:30:45pm

re: #563 Syrah

I went through some grasping at magic straws, but I released them completely.

What is NOT released is my oath to protect the Constitution from enemies, foreign and domestic... THAT conflict is not resolved yet...

576 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:31:37pm

re: #566 Walter L. Newton

I want to know why any church would even hold a conference like this. It's a freckin' church. If you want to teach or preach or look into ID or creationism, then do it.

It's San Francisco, naturally.

Though, as a Unitarian, I'd say it could as easily be Beacon Hill.

577 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:31:49pm

re: #552 mich-again

Curious. What were the common ancestors?

Humans are part of the primate family, and genetic research has proven that our closest living relatives in that family are the chimpanzees.

Both humans and chimps are descended from a common primate ancestor -- not an ape or a monkey, but a primate. The split occurred sometime between 5 and 8 million years ago.

578 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:31:52pm

Looks like another LA. Dem besides William Jefferson about to lose his Congressional seat to a Republican-

It was also a discouraging night for Democrats in the race for retiring Rep. Jim McCrery’s seat – the other contest in Louisiana. With all precincts reporting, Republican John Fleming leads Democrat Paul Carmouche by 356 votes. The AP has not yet called the race for Fleming.

A Democratic operative said that Carmouche is not conceding the race, given the small margin of Fleming's victory, and left open the possibility of a recount.

Both parties spent about a million dollars to win the Fourth District seat. President-elect Barack Obama recorded a radio ad for Carmouche, but it wasn't enough to rally enough African-American voters to the polls.

579 lostlakehiker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:31:52pm

Good grief! We have yet to explain how evolution can occur without a universe? When did we ever claim that there isn't a universe?

They have yet to explain how it can be that there is light from galaxies billions of light years away, when all creation is only thousands of years old.

The explanation that oh, God's just funnin with us, strikes me as more in the camp of blasphemy than anything he's going to read about evolution on this site or elsewhere.

As to evolution and "still have apes", well, amphibians evolved from fish and we still have fish. It's simple, really. When in due course it came to pass that some fish were living on the boundary between water and dry land, those fish were in a situation where variations that favored the ability to live less in the water and more on land had less competition. The tidal flats and riparian verges were their oyster. As variations piled up, land-capable animals gradually emerged. Meanwhile, other fish were living on the ocean floor, and there, other variations were favored: having both eyes on one side of the head is better when the other side is always facing the mud! Tadah, flounders. Still others developed habits of living within spiny banks of poison darts, to which they were either immune or so agile they escaped.

Yes, we still have fish, and there's nothing illogical about it. The fish that evolved to live on land weren't better fitted to every possible environment than were the water-dwelling fish. They were just better fitted to their own environment. Meanwhile, other fish were evolving in different ways.

Chimpanzees are amazing animals in their own right. They are, for one thing, very strong for their size. Chimps aren't just low-quality knockoffs of humans.

580 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:32:06pm

re: #565 realwest

Ah, well it's coming with Vista pre-installed - I searched high and low to get an XP and coudn't find one, but as replacements go, this one's pretty good, spec wise anyway - it's an HP - Pavilion
Desktop with Intel. Pentium. Dual-Core Processor E5200 (Model: a6620f %P% SKU: 9062373)
Intel. Pentium. Dual-Core processor E5220; 4GB DDR2 SDRAM; DL DVD1RW/CD-RW
drive; LightScribe labeling; 500GB hard drive; Windows Vista Home Premium
64-bit with SP1
500 gig HD.
I know what the DVD RW/CD-RW are and the 4 gigs of ram and the 500 gigs HD, but have no clue what a LightScribe labeling is, and have never had a VISTA before.
But, Best Buy did give me full credit on my purchase price of this computer (which I bought about 22 months ago) and I thought that was fair.

You got a good deal. I just had two built to about the same specs. They are fast. 4gigs of memory will run Vista with plenty to spare. Good luck tomorrow!

581 Lynn B.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:32:39pm

re: #541 Charles

More hate mail:

"Run out of your store?" Didn't realize you were selling anything here.

Pathetic.

582 Charles Johnson  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:33:50pm

re: #581 Lynn B.

"Run out of your store?" Didn't realize you were selling anything here.

Pathetic.

It's just another attempt to bully me into not posting about this subject. SOS.

583 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:34:03pm

re: #568 razorbacker

While I've successfully replaced the hard drive, and upped the RAM, I confess to being unsure about how to open the case. And that seems to be necessary.

If it's an HP, go to their website, go to support and find the support page for your model.

HP has some of the best support I have seen on a website. You will find PDF's of all the manuals, service manuals etc. and you can download it.

If you opened your HP case to install a hard drive, and upped the ram, then you know everything you need to know about getting to the power supply.

Open it up, unscrew the 4 or 5 screws that hold the power supply to the back of the case, make a diagram of what cable go to what devices, unplug the cables (carefully, don't force or pull, wiggle them out carefully from the sockets) and replace with a new power supply.

There are websites that handle powers supplies. You can put the model number in and it will come back with the replacement supply you need.

584 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:34:36pm

re: #582 Charles

It's just another attempt to bully me into not posting about this subject. SOS.

SOS = Stuck On Stupid. Is that right?

585 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:34:57pm

re: #580 SurferDoc
Thanks for the kind words and good wishes!

586 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:35:29pm

re: #568 razorbacker

While I've successfully replaced the hard drive, and upped the RAM, I confess to being unsure about how to open the case. And that seems to be necessary.

How did you up the RAM and replace the hard drive without opening the case?

587 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:35:35pm

re: #584 Dark_Falcon

SOS = Stuck On Stupid. Is that right?

Same Old ...um, Shizzle

588 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:35:40pm

re: #584 Dark_Falcon

SOS = Stuck On Stupid. Is that right?

Same old shit (I think)

589 Lynn B.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:35:57pm

re: #547 swamprat

gift tax. outrageous

Gift tax for what? Where's the gift?

590 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:37:15pm

re: #583 Walter L. Newton

If it's an HP, go to their website, go to support and find the support page for your model.

HP has some of the best support I have seen on a website. You will find PDF's of all the manuals, service manuals etc. and you can download it.

If you opened your HP case to install a hard drive, and upped the ram, then you know everything you need to know about getting to the power supply.

Thanks for that advice. I'll give it a try.

It wasn't necessary to open the case to install either the hard drive or the RAM. They both just needed a couple of screws taken out, and the component just slid out. Pretty simple.

591 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:37:45pm

re: #589 Lynn B. the car is a gift from the company

592 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:38:00pm

re: #586 LeePro

see 590.

593 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:38:10pm

re: #556 Salamantis

Well, it's blindingly obvious that there is such a thing as theism parading as science; it's called ID.

Anyone who is claims that there is a God or that there is no God are on equal logical standing seeing as neither side can prove their own argument or disprove the other.

594 Clemente  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:38:39pm

Mysterious lights sighted near California coast.

595 Lynn B.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:39:18pm

re: #591 swamprat

the car is a gift from the company

Nope. It's compensation.

596 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:39:41pm

Boy I must have missed something during this video then.

My take is:

1. It is OK for a scientist to be religious.

and

2. It is OK for a priest to have an interest in science.

I did not get the feeling that the two were mutually exclusive.

I also got the message that science does not require faith, or trust, or belief; science just is, and is always changing based on new evidence.

597 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:39:51pm

re: #590 razorbacker

Thanks for that advice. I'll give it a try.

It wasn't necessary to open the case to install either the hard drive or the RAM. They both just needed a couple of screws taken out, and the component just slid out. Pretty simple.

Oops You are talking about a laptop. Sorry. Why beyond my paid grade. Ignore everything I was saying. I though you were talking about a desktop.

Although I suspect you could still go to HP and get the info.

598 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:40:07pm

I say, emphaticllly, ...oh, never mind.

599 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:40:35pm

re: #589 Lynn B.

If you find treasure, or win a lottery, it will become very clear. Or so I have been told.

600 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:40:39pm

re: #591 swamprat
But I thought the person (or company) giving the gift had to pay the gift tax (family members up to some number I'll never see or get to are exempt), no?

602 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:40:56pm

re: #594 Clemente

Mysterious lights sighted near California coast.

I saw nothing in the sky in that picture. WTF?

603 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:41:19pm

re: #593 mich-again

Anyone who is claims that there is a God or that there is no God are on equal logical standing seeing as neither side can prove their own argument or disprove the other.

Right, Wrong, and Meaningless
by James Sedgwick

• "Why do I keep dropping things?"
• "It’s the shoons."
• "What are shoons?"
• "Invisible beings that pull things out of your hands and throw them on the floor."
• "Why would I believe that?"
• "Well, if you can’t disprove it, you have to believe it."
• "But you didn’t prove it."
• "I can feel them. You can feel them too You’re just in denial."
• "Well I don’t believe it."
• "So you are an ashoonist."
• "What’s an ashoonist?"
• "One who arbitrarily refuses to believe in shoons. You wonder why you drop things, but you arbitrarily reject the explanation."
• "Okay then, I’m an ashoonist."
• "But ashoonists are all cynics and killjoys! Is that the kind of company you want to keep?"

What a silly way to argue! Or is it? If you separate the method of argument from the content, then you might notice that it is the most common of all methods of argument: the arbitrary declaration. They say that something is so, and you have to either disprove it or agree with it. Refusing to do either is joining the Meanies.

It’s a paradox. You cannot reject an assertion without reason, but you could waste the whole day finding reasons to reject arbitrary assertions. An epistemology of reason solves the paradox by taking away permission to make assertions in the first place without reasons.

Come to think of it, where did that permission come from? If an assertion does not come with an observable connection to reality, why would anybody pay attention to it? Well, if it has to be either right or wrong, then you have to decide which, and you have to be reasonable. So you can’t reject anything without disproving it.

But what if a statement could be something else besides right or wrong? What if it could also be simply meaningless?

Right and wrong are relationships to reality – correspondence and non-correspondence. To judge a statement as right or wrong, you compare it to reality, by finding what part of reality it compares to. If a statement does not say what part of reality it compares to, then it is presented without connection to reality. It could mean all sorts of things, depending on where it fits in reality. Since that is not specified, it means nothing. It conveys words, but not meaning. Since you cannot call it right, and you cannot call it wrong, you call it arbitrary. Arbitrary means lacking any evidence of a relationship to reality.

To treat arbitrary assertions as right is to be a self-made sucker. To treat them as wrong is to try judging without evidence. The objective way is to realize that assertions without evidence are meaningless. No matter how much emotion they contain, nothing has been said.

Here’s a completion of the original argument:

• "Wait! Before you told me about the shoons, was I a shoonist, or an ashoonist?"
• "Well, neither. That word just meant nothing to you."
• "And it still means nothing to me. Try me again when you’ve got evidence."

604 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:41:34pm

re: #568 razorbacker

While I've successfully replaced the hard drive, and upped the RAM, I confess to being unsure about how to open the case. And that seems to be necessary.

HP is very good about responding to "help me" emails.

Coincidentally, today I was trying to find out if I could upgrade my RAM in my Compaq [HP] laptop, and was getting the run around. Some sites said I was maxed out, others said I could add 2 Gb more.

I emailed HP around lunchtime, and had a response from their tech desk by 2:00... complete with the correct answer, links to websites selling the correct memory, and links to the correct pages in the HP online user manuals on how to do the job.

I was very impressed!

605 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:41:34pm

re: #553 Charles


Actually, when my husband, who was just newly my husband, was in his senior year at Caltech, he was friends with the guy that ran one of the labs. I can't remember exactly precisely what he did, except that he was employed by the University, and he was post-PhD.

Sometimes people would just randomly call Caltech, because it was Caltech, with a science question. The secretaries put the calls through to this guy. Yes, he got calls from people who thought their neighbors were beaming things into their heads and yes, he told them to put tin foil in their heads.

What else was he supposed to do? Argue with them?

606 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:41:46pm

re: #595 Lynn B.

Nope. It's compensation.

Nontaxable as property received?

607 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:41:50pm

re: #574 realwest

Um, yes, I asked are we still on topic and she said "Yes".

Um, NO.
your #518: Hey y'all - are we still pretty much ON Topic OR have we drifted away some?

Syrah #525: Yes.

Beware ambiguity. It'll bite-cha in the butt every time!
: Þ

608 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:41:52pm

re: #577 Charles

Humans are part of the primate family, and genetic research has proven that our closest living relatives in that family are the chimpanzees.

Both humans and chimps are descended from a common primate ancestor -- not an ape or a monkey, but a primate. The split occurred sometime between 5 and 8 million years ago.

The Tree Of Life

609 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:43:06pm

re: #597 Walter L. Newton

Oops You are talking about a laptop. Sorry. Why beyond my paid grade. Ignore everything I was saying. I though you were talking about a desktop.

Although I suspect you could still go to HP and get the info.

Damn. And I had such high hopes;)

I'm actually, along with most everyone else, CompTia A+ certified. I can say hello to Bill Gates and everything.

Though he don't say hello back, ya unnerstand.

610 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:43:12pm

re: #565 realwest

Vista is not Linux, but it is not bad for Windows. The trick to making it work well enough for simple tasks is to max out the ram on your system. The specs that you posted suggests a machine that is more than adequate to that end.

I have one system with Vista Premium and one with Vista Ultimate. Both have worked well for me. My XP systems have given me more grief.

The only complaints that I have about Vista thus far is that it is a bit of a resource hog and I can't run some superannuated software on it.

It works well enough for most everything else.

I would recommend picking up a copy of Windows Vista Inside-Out if you have a chance.

611 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:43:23pm

re: #599 swamprat
Yeah but winning the lottery or finding treasure isn't the same thing as a gift from someone to you. It's more or less pure chance.
Betcha the IRS taxes any winnings (rofl!) that you get in Vegas!

612 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:43:56pm

re: #571 gmsc

I like watching the "nirth certificat" fetishists. Monday should be fun, when the Supreme Court announces whether they're taking up the cases.

I would be very surprised if they do anything but ignore it.

613 swamprat  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:44:07pm

re: #600 realwest

Don't know.

614 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:44:13pm

re: #608 Racer X

The Tree Of Life

The bunnies and the spiders are going to play in the championship game.

Watch for it on ESPN!

615 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:44:22pm

re: #578 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Looks like another LA. Dem besides William Jefferson about to lose his Congressional seat to a Republican-

It was also a discouraging night for Democrats in the race for retiring Rep. Jim McCrery’s seat – the other contest in Louisiana. With all precincts reporting, Republican John Fleming leads Democrat Paul Carmouche by 356 votes. The AP has not yet called the race for Fleming.

A Democratic operative said that Carmouche is not conceding the race, given the small margin of Fleming's victory, and left open the possibility of a recount.

Both parties spent about a million dollars to win the Fourth District seat. President-elect Barack Obama recorded a radio ad for Carmouche, but it wasn't enough to rally enough African-American voters to the polls.

Oooo. Cool! Got a link? An article I read today (MSM, obviously) implied otherwise...

616 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:44:26pm

re: #593 mich-again

Anyone who is claims that there is a God or that there is no God are on equal logical standing seeing as neither side can prove their own argument or disprove the other.

Yes and no. Absence of evidence of presence is not evidence of absence, but it is certainly more supportive of absence than of presence. Can you prove that there are not presently dwarves fellating unicorns beneath the mountains of the moon? There exists no less evidence for this contention than there exists for the existence of an cosmic designer. There also does not exist any more evidence for either contention.

The presence or absence of the imperceptible is impossible to detect, and the shadow that a ghost casts upon the world is a most insubstantial thing.

617 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:44:54pm

re: #602 Walter L. Newton

I saw nothing in the sky in that picture. WTF?

Dude.

618 jaunte  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:45:13pm

re: #603 gmsc

Correspondence and non-correspondence with reality is simply an outmoded Enlightenment concept in this Post-Modern world.
/

619 Lynn B.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:45:37pm

re: #606 swamprat

Nontaxable as property received?

Taxable as earned income. I'm brain dead at this time of night so the name of the seminal case escapes me but a transfer from an employer to an employee is deemed to be earned income in the absence of strong evidence to the contrary.

620 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:45:49pm

re: #604 stevieray

Good to know. I haven't troubled them, since I'm long out of warranty.

I'll drop them a line and see if they give satisfaction.

621 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:46:01pm

Quantum of Solace.

Somewhat disappointing.

622 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:46:08pm

re: #604 stevieray

[Link: www.crucial.com...] for all memory questions...Then use their memory advisor. It will tell you what you need, and what your max is.

623 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:47:08pm

re: #620 razorbacker

Good to know. I haven't troubled them, since I'm long out of warranty.

I'll drop them a line and see if they give satisfaction.

And really, I did mean it when I said that their support website is one of the best. Check it out.

[Link: welcome.hp.com...]

624 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:47:43pm

re: #612 Syrah

I would be very surprised if they do anything but ignore it.

There is one curve that could cause them to take it up. A lower court in one of the cases ruled that it was not the purview of the courts to decide the issue of 0bama's eligibility.

Even if all 9 members believe the question itself to be pointless, this declaration by a lower court may warrant the Supreme Court's attentions. That's the wild card.

625 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:47:55pm

And on that happy note, I'll go devolve into a slugabed.

626 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:48:02pm

re: #592 razorbacker

see 590.

*blink* *blink*

627 Karridine  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:48:10pm

re: #607 LeePro

Ambiguity bites? Agreed, LeePro, but it is also IMPOSSIBLE to write in such a manner as to preclude ALL (or any) misunderstanding...

/you clarity is my fumbling abmiguity... or ambidextrousness... or Abni Gayshun... :D

628 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:48:11pm

re: #615 LeePro

Oooo. Cool! Got a link? An article I read today (MSM, obviously) implied otherwise...

Here- It's from Politico.com in the Jefferson story. Read down a few paragraphs.
[Link: www.politico.com...]

629 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:48:27pm

re: #618 jaunte

Correspondence and non-correspondence with reality is simply an outmoded Enlightenment concept in this Post-Modern world.
/

Downdinged for such an absur . . . oh, slashy - updinged!

630 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:48:37pm

re: #486 J.S.

They're undermining science (and free inquiry), and thus, inadvertently giving certain parties (ID people, for example) opportunities to advance their "cause"...so in a round about way, indirectly, the answer is "yes." (I think this is inherent in most forms of fanaticism -- the other side benefits.)

I can understand your point about giving the DI ammunition, but to put this on par with the DI and other IDers as far as undermining science is a bit of a stretch, don't you think? I think it's more akin to poor strategy and tactics- similar to the GOP really. The GOP has a hard time getting it's superior message across, so too do the scientists trying to defend evolution.

631 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:49:00pm

re: #608 Racer X

The Tree Of Life

That's a pretty sparse representation; it doesn't include humans OR apes...or dogs or cats or bears or pigs or horses, for that matter...

632 Moody Leo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:49:46pm

re: #615 LeePro Well... there's this [Link: www.shreveporttimes.com...]

such as it is.

633 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:49:48pm

re: #616 Salamantis

Absence of evidence of presence is not evidence of absence,

Actually, it can be, if the phenomenon in question could reasonably be expected to have generated ample evidence. (E.g., "Noah's Flood".)

634 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:49:54pm

re: #625 Dar ul Harb

And on that happy note, I'll go devolve into a slugabed.

When my wife decides to sleep in, she says she's going to be a slutabed.

Oddly enough, I find it enticing.

635 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:50:32pm

re: #631 Salamantis

That's a pretty sparse representation; it doesn't include humans OR apes...or dogs or cats or bears or pigs or horses, for that matter...

Apparently, we're bunny rabbits.

636 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:50:36pm

re: #610 Syrah
Thanks Syrah - yeah, I knew VISTA is a resource hog, which is why, when they said 4 Gig RAM I didn't argue with 'em cause Geek Friends of mine said 3 Gig RAM would be more than adequate for what I use the computer to do.

637 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:51:31pm

re: #618 jaunte

Correspondence and non-correspondence with reality is simply an outmoded Enlightenment concept in this Post-Modern world.
/

Wow; the Post-Modern world sounds a lot like the Pre-Modern world...;~)

638 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:52:20pm

re: #572 Salamantis

We know from comparing human and chimpanzee artifactual retroviral DNA sequences that they lived around 5 million years ago. Which means that Lucy, an Australopithecus Afarensus who lived around 2 1/2 million years ago, was on our side after the split.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Here's a phylogenetic tree of Human Ancestors, note that many branches died out and this is current best knowledge. They haven't tracked back to the exact common primate ancestor, so it could go back as far as Lemurs or even further.

639 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:52:46pm

re: #622 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

[Link: www.crucial.com...] for all memory questions...Then use their memory advisor. It will tell you what you need, and what your max is.

Gah! That's one of the ones I went to today! I did the online scan, and they told me I had two empty memory slots, but my memory was maxed out! [huh?] Both answers were wrong.

I used that site a while back to upgrade my Dell desktop, and it worked great... accurately stated my RAM, had the right info on max memory and the correct type.

I guess its hit-or-miss on accuracy.

640 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:53:06pm

re: #631 Salamantis

That's a pretty sparse representation; it doesn't include humans OR apes...or dogs or cats or bears or pigs or horses, for that matter...

Another.

641 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:53:24pm

re: #594 Clemente

Mysterious lights sighted near California coast.

re: #602 Walter L. Newton

I saw nothing in the sky in that picture. WTF?

...in the sky?
WTF, WTF?

642 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:53:31pm

re: #633 Occasional Reader

Actually, it can be, if the phenomenon in question could reasonably be expected to have generated ample evidence. (E.g., "Noah's Flood".)

Point taken. Post updinged.

643 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:53:38pm

BTW, the Electoral College does not meet in each state's capitol until Dec. 15th to actually elect the President.

/Just saying.

644 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:54:03pm

re: #577 Charles

The split occurred sometime between 5 and 8 million years ago.

Cool. But its funny that we always hear how humans haven't evolved as a species in the last couple thousand years. Whoever Jesus was, he likely had 10 fingers and toes and 2 eyes that worked. But in less than 4,000 times that same time span humans and apes became completely different species from a common parent species through purely random genetic mutations. I'm not so sure.

Random is too often used as a crutch for "I don't understand how.."

645 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:54:14pm

re: #637 Salamantis

Wow; the Post-Modern world sounds a lot like the Pre-Modern world...;~)

Bingo.

646 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:54:14pm

re: #638 Thanos

Here's a phylogenetic tree of Human Ancestors, note that many branches died out and this is current best knowledge. They haven't tracked back to the exact common primate ancestor, so it could go back as far as Lemurs or even further.

Where is the pictures, I can't understand this, and it's got a lot of long dead-language names.
/

647 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:54:28pm

re: #575 Karridine

I think that the birth certificate controversy is a dead end.

The Birth certificate must be proved to be false.

At this late date, I don't think that can be done.

If it can't be proven, it should not be pursued.

648 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:54:54pm

And I'm still trying to figure out what went wrong with Quantum of Solace. A weighty issue.

649 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:55:03pm

re: #607 LeePro
Hah! Starting with Syrah's #554 on down, it's obvious that Syrah and I are communicating on the same plane, irregardless of your grammer police methods!
LOL!
;')

BTW - how are you doing tonight?

650 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:56:31pm

re: #638 Thanos

Here's a phylogenetic tree of Human Ancestors, note that many branches died out and this is current best knowledge. They haven't tracked back to the exact common primate ancestor, so it could go back as far as Lemurs or even further.

No, it has to date to the 5-8 million year ago range for humans and chimps. The artifactual retroviral DNA evidence on this is pretty conclusive. Of course we share common ancestors with lemurs, too, but they're much further back.

651 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:56:31pm

re: #644 mich-again

Cool. But its funny that we always hear how humans haven't evolved as a species in the last couple thousand years. Whoever Jesus was, he likely had 10 fingers and toes and 2 eyes that worked. But in less than 4,000 times that same time span humans and apes became completely different species from a common parent species through purely random genetic mutations. I'm not so sure.

Random is too often used as a crutch for "I don't understand how.."

Actually, you can make a case for humans having evolved. We have gotten bigger. Our jaws have grown too small the number of teeth we have, hence impacted wisdom teeth. Then there is the appendix--but that was earlier, I suppose.

652 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:56:47pm

re: #603 gmsc

What's the Reader's Digest version of that post?

653 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:57:05pm

re: #644 mich-again

Cool. But its funny that we always hear how humans haven't evolved as a species in the last couple thousand years. Whoever Jesus was, he likely had 10 fingers and toes and 2 eyes that worked. But in less than 4,000 times that same time span humans and apes became completely different species from a common parent species through purely random genetic mutations. I'm not so sure.

Random is too often used as a crutch for "I don't understand how.."

Here's a better chart, and do we really know enough to say that "humans haven't evolved in the last 2000 years?"

654 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:57:11pm

re: #639 stevieray

Gah! That's one of the ones I went to today! I did the online scan, and they told me I had two empty memory slots, but my memory was maxed out! [huh?] Both answers were wrong.

I used that site a while back to upgrade my Dell desktop, and it worked great... accurately stated my RAM, had the right info on max memory and the correct type.

I guess its hit-or-miss on accuracy.

Oh well, I've never had a problem with crucial going back to WIN95.

655 Panhandler  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:57:42pm

re: #649 realwest

Hah! Starting with Syrah's #554 on down, it's obvious that Syrah and I are communicating on the same plane, irregardless of your grammer police methods!
LOL!
;')

BTW - how are you doing tonight?


Ahem, da grammer police iz always here.

656 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:57:50pm

Last week, returning home on a flight... I sat next to some metrosexual guy who was reading "Post American World".

I took a few opportunities to read over his shoulder...

Wow, what garbage.

Hmmm... when does this happen? January 20, 2009? Or, maybe January 21st?

Or, perhaps... February 12th?

No - maybe March the second...

Wait - wait... June 24th...

No...

(Help - I iz cornfuzed)

657 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:57:52pm

re: #644 mich-again

What environmental pressures have humans had in the last 2000 years that would spur evolution of our species?

658 Dar ul Harb  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:58:35pm

re: #634 razorbacker

When my wife decides to sleep in, she says she's going to be a slutabed.

Oddly enough, I find it enticing.

Apropos of temptation.

659 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:58:38pm

re: #650 Salamantis

No, it has to date to the 5-8 million year ago range for humans and chimps. The artifactual retroviral DNA evidence on this is pretty conclusive. Of course we share common ancestors with lemurs, too, but they're much further back.

Yep, you are right, I forgot about the matching DNA.

660 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:58:48pm

re: #657 Sharmuta

What environmental pressures have humans had in the last 2000 years that would spur evolution of our species?

Global Warming.

661 windhorse  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:58:53pm

re: #657 Sharmuta


my ex-wife...

662 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 9:59:49pm

re: #640 Racer X

I like this one; scroll down to the second chart.

[Link: darwiniana.org...]

663 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:00:22pm

re: #630 Sharmuta

Perhaps...then, again, I don't know how far certain individuals (these would be the fanatics), if given the power, would go...(that video link of the atheist scientists discussing their "orthodoxy", near the end, began to consider "ideas" about how to address "the problem" -- the "problem" was what to do with those scientists who'd refuse to endorse atheism...anyway, these "scientists" did express a very high level of intolerance...and I was not impressed...perhaps it's only a "phase" (?) or (one can hope) non-representative of most scientists...but, again, I wouldn't want to have any of these fanatics given power...)

664 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:00:26pm

re: #653 Thanos

Ha. I went there and got Ross Peroted with charts.

665 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:00:29pm

re: #657 Sharmuta

What environmental pressures have humans had in the last 2000 years that would spur evolution of our species?

Underpants gnomes.

666 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:00:44pm

re: #612 Syrah I agree about SCOTUS taking up the case, but OTOH, iirc it was Mr. Justice Souter who wanted SCOTUS to hear it.
Now why the hell would Souter want that?
I think the nirth certificate thing is just bullshit. I really do.
And has anyone given any thought as to what it would mean if SCOTUS should rule that Obama is ineligible to hold the office of POTUS?!

667 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:00:52pm

re: #652 mich-again

What's the Reader's Digest version of that post?

The last paragraph sums it up best:

To treat arbitrary assertions as right is to be a self-made sucker. To treat them as wrong is to try judging without evidence. The objective way is to realize that assertions without evidence are meaningless. No matter how much emotion they contain, nothing has been said.

668 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:01:15pm

re: #657 Sharmuta

What environmental pressures have humans had in the last 2000 years that would spur evolution of our species?

Stress that does not allow us to use some of our natural defenses such as violent anger. More stress resilient people would have an advantage.

669 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:01:35pm

re: #598 fiat_lux

670 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:01:50pm

re: #657 Sharmuta

Well we had the black plague and a mini-ice age for starters. I'm sure there were more.

671 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:02:09pm

re: #665 Occasional Reader

Underpants gnomes.

My evil gnomes will kick your evil gnomes' asses.

672 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:02:11pm

re: #611 realwest

Yeah but winning the lottery or finding treasure isn't the same thing as a gift from someone to you. It's more or less pure chance.
Betcha the IRS taxes any winnings (rofl!) that you get in Vegas!

Taxes and the Lottery

...and MORE

673 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:02:20pm

FYI, Navy kicked Army's ass 34-zip to win for the 7th time in a row. But I did like Army's new uniforms- Cammy helmets, pants, and numbers on the jerseys.

674 Racer X  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:02:58pm

re: #657 Sharmuta

What environmental pressures have humans had in the last 2000 years that would spur evolution of our species?

Some humans on this rock have taken the next step and built wondrous machines that have taken them past the boundaries of Earth. Other humans desire to take us back to the dark ages.

Evolution in action.

675 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:03:26pm

re: #666 realwest

I agree about SCOTUS taking up the case, but OTOH, iirc it was Mr. Justice Souter who wanted SCOTUS to hear it.
Now why the hell would Souter want that?
I think the nirth certificate thing is just bullshit. I really do.
And has anyone given any thought as to what it would mean if SCOTUS should rule that Obama is ineligible to hold the office of POTUS?!

President Biden?

676 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:03:48pm

re: #667 gmsc

No matter how much emotion they contain, nothing has been said.

I agree with that completely.

677 Maximu§  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:04:16pm

re: #673 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

FYI, Navy kicked Army's ass 34-zip to win for the 7th time in a row. But I did like Army's new uniforms- Cammy helmets, pants, and numbers on the jerseys.

Booo Navy.

678 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:04:33pm

re: #671 Sharmuta

My evil gnomes will kick your evil gnomes' asses.

My gnomes are stealing your underpants at this very moment.

679 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:04:56pm

re: #666 realwest

I agree about SCOTUS taking up the case, but OTOH, iirc it was Mr. Justice Souter who wanted SCOTUS to hear it.
Now why the hell would Souter want that?
I think the nirth certificate thing is just bullshit. I really do.
And has anyone given any thought as to what it would mean if SCOTUS should rule that Obama is ineligible to hold the office of POTUS?!

Or riots in the streets, maybe?

680 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:05:31pm

re: #678 Occasional Reader

My gnomes are stealing your underpants at this very moment.

Then the joke's on them.

681 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:06:04pm

re: #655 Panhandler
That's why I put a LOL and a ;') in there.
Everyone has to get in on the act!

682 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:06:20pm

re: #654 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Oh well, I've never had a problem with crucial going back to WIN95.

I'll continue to use it myself too. It comes highly recommended, and its never let me down before.

Dunno why it was so far off this time... perhaps fooled by Vista? Maybe their still working on debugging it for Uncle Bill's latest creation... I imagine 90% of their users are upgrading pre-Vista era pc's.

683 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:06:44pm

re: #680 Sharmuta

Then the joke's on them.

*** Fans self quickly to cool down ***

684 Panhandler  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:06:57pm

re: #678 Occasional Reader

My gnomes are stealing your underpants at this very moment.


Right

685 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:07:13pm

So, my Big Fun today; putting the first 150 rounds through my new Kimber (finally!).

Had one misfeed on the first mag, which I'm told is normal.

686 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:07:39pm

re: #644 mich-again

Cool. But its funny that we always hear how humans haven't evolved as a species in the last couple thousand years. Whoever Jesus was, he likely had 10 fingers and toes and 2 eyes that worked. But in less than 4,000 times that same time span humans and apes became completely different species from a common parent species through purely random genetic mutations. I'm not so sure.

Random is too often used as a crutch for "I don't understand how.."

Modern humans can be traced to Y-Chromosomal Adam and Mitochondrial Eve:

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

They never met, because they lived 50,000 to 80,000 years apart, and Eve was first (140,000 years ago).

Modern humans supposedly lived earlier, as early as 200,000 years ago, but the strains that can be traced to Y-Chromosomal Adam and Mitochondrial Eve are the only ones with living descendents.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

687 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:08:36pm

I wish SCOTUS would take up the nirth certificate case (which I think is nutty) just to give us a clear definition of who can and can't be president.

Personally, and I am not a lawyer, born to a US citizen or inside the US works for me.

688 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:08:40pm

re: #624 gmsc

There is one curve that could cause them to take it up. A lower court in one of the cases ruled that it was not the purview of the courts to decide the issue of 0bama's eligibility.

Even if all 9 members believe the question itself to be pointless, this declaration by a lower court may warrant the Supreme Court's attentions. That's the wild card.

That would raise a bit of a hullabaloo.

Still, If there is a line in Vegas, and if I were there, I would put my money down on the supreme court not taking up the case.

689 Wishing  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:08:44pm

re: #685 Occasional Reader

So, my Big Fun today; puyou like your gun? What is the model?tting the first 150 rounds through my new Kimber (finally!).

Had one misfeed on the first mag, which I'm told is normal.

And I picked up my new plinker, Sig Mosquito. I t is snowing here tho, so I didnt get to go to the range.
How do you likve the Kimber? Which do you have?

690 Randall Gross  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:08:45pm

re: #664 mich-again

Ha. I went there and got Ross Peroted with charts.

Heh

691 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:09:05pm
692 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:09:19pm

re: #628 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Here- It's from Politico.com in the Jefferson story. Read down a few paragraphs.
[Link: www.politico.com...]

Thanks and waHOOO! ! !
In the meantime, found another link HERE.

693 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:09:41pm

re: #677 Maximu§
Gooo Army!But ya know, SEVEN times in a row is really embarrasing - guess we ought to recruit folks to West Point who specialize in Football - like Annapolis does!
/ducks to avoid incoming!

694 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:10:17pm

re: #689 Wishing

How do you likve the Kimber? Which do you have?

I liked it very, very much. Smoooth. It's the Kimber Warrior.

695 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:10:29pm

re: #687 EmmmieG

I wish SCOTUS would take up the nirth certificate case (which I think is nutty) just to give us a clear definition of who can and can't be president.

Personally, and I am not a lawyer, born to a US citizen or inside the US works for me.

Well, there is that U.S. Constituton thing they have to consider, if they do take it up.

696 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:11:17pm

re: #663 J.S.

Perhaps...then, again, I don't know how far certain individuals (these would be the fanatics), if given the power, would go...(that video link of the atheist scientists discussing their "orthodoxy", near the end, began to consider "ideas" about how to address "the problem" -- the "problem" was what to do with those scientists who'd refuse to endorse atheism...anyway, these "scientists" did express a very high level of intolerance...and I was not impressed...perhaps it's only a "phase" (?) or (one can hope) non-representative of most scientists...but, again, I wouldn't want to have any of these fanatics given power...)

As with most issues- the fringes on either side of a debate can be problematic and end up thwarting themselves. I'm not going to defend the rabid atheists on this issue, just like I'm not going to defend the creationists. Pushing their atheist views onto others is no different than fundamentalists of other religions trying to push their beliefs on people who don't want it.

697 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:11:25pm

re: #679 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
BINGO!

698 Panhandler  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:11:35pm

re: #693 realwest

Gooo Army!But ya know, SEVEN times in a row is really embarrasing - guess we ought to recruit folks to West Point who specialize in Football - like Annapolis does!
/ducks to avoid incoming!

Please note that the Navy quarterback is also a Brigade Commander, which you don't achieve by being a football hero.

699 Wishing  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:11:49pm

re: #694 Occasional Reader

I liked it very, very much. Smoooth. It's the Kimber Warrior.

Well, well, a 1911! Ya just cant go wrong with that!

700 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:12:02pm

re: #682 stevieray

I'll continue to use it myself too. It comes highly recommended, and its never let me down before.

Dunno why it was so far off this time... perhaps fooled by Vista? Maybe their still working on debugging it for Uncle Bill's latest creation... I imagine 90% of their users are upgrading pre-Vista era pc's.

Excellent point since I'd assume all Vista PC's have sufficient RAM, although Microsoft claims 512mb is the minimum. And probably 90% of those running Vista bought a new PC with it. I doubt many upgraded their current PC.
I'm still running XP SP2, even though I know there's an SP3. If it ain't broke, why attempt to fix it?

701 nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:12:07pm

Well here we are all tight as a bug in a rug,

USC? off thread of course.

My many neighbors in El Norte Hollywood screaming about some "fight?"
LAPD AIR is up and crusing the HOOD, so I will bid you all g-nite while I walk the perimeter with the Glock...

"ORANGES?," "WE DON NEED NO STINKIN ORANGES!"

702 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:12:19pm

re: #651 SurferDoc

Actually, you can make a case for humans having evolved. We have gotten bigger. Our jaws have grown too small the number of teeth we have, hence impacted wisdom teeth. Then there is the appendix--but that was earlier, I suppose.

We have evolved geographically specific complexions and hair characteristics to dwal with different sunlight levels, geographically specific disease immunities (that can also cause medical problems themselves, such as with sickle-cell anemia, which conveys malaria resistance), and even the ability for adults from cultures that domesticated animals long enough ago to digest milk, an ability that is missing from other cultures.

703 Maximu§  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:12:29pm

re: #693 realwest

Gooo Army!But ya know, SEVEN times in a row is really embarrasing - guess we ought to recruit folks to West Point who specialize in Football - like Annapolis does!
/ducks to avoid incoming!

Hey, I'm head'n out to my sons graduation next week at Ft. Knox.

704 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:13:38pm

re: #694 Occasional Reader

I liked it very, very much. Smoooth. It's the Kimber Warrior.

I don't even know anyone worthy of being shot by a $1441 pistol.

705 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:14:11pm

re: #666 realwest

I agree about SCOTUS taking up the case, but OTOH, iirc it was Mr. Justice Souter who wanted SCOTUS to hear it.
Now why the hell would Souter want that?
I think the nirth certificate thing is just bullshit. I really do.
And has anyone given any thought as to what it would mean if SCOTUS should rule that Obama is ineligible to hold the office of POTUS?!

The left part of the country would have a tantrum toss to beat all tantrum tosses. It would be ugly. Riots, wailing, gnashing of teeth, and Breast not bombs (cringe) demonstrations.

I am not up to speed on this stuff. Can one Justice, Justice Souter in this case, make this a Supreme court case by himself or does it take more than just one?

706 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:14:52pm

re: #632 Moody Leo

Well... there's this [Link: www.shreveporttimes.com...]

such as it is.

That's the Fleming/Carmouche state race (another good one - THANKS!). I was referring to the William "cash-in-the-freezer-felon" Jefferson US congressional race. The MSM was gushing an easy win for him all day yesterday!

707 lostlakehiker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:15:09pm

re: #288 LoFlyer

I have been told he has an IQ of 146. I find that hard to believe as anyone with average or above average intelligence would never contemplate running for president. It is truly the national boobie prize!

Estimates are all over the map. 146 is higher than any I've heard. But look: all the candidates have above-average intelligence, even the genuine idiots.
'
The presidency isn't a booby prize. It's an Archimedean place to stand; a place where you have leverage.

A lot of people think they know what this country needs. Some of them think they have a chance to make the needed changes happen. Why wouldn't you give it a shot if you did have that chance?

It's perfectly rational to seek the presidency if you want to make things you think need to happen, happen, and if you have enough support and political talent that winning is a distinct possibility.

708 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:15:33pm

re: #695 gmsc
Well unless Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg has her way!

709 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:15:56pm

Okay, so crazy question, why would a baby born to a pair of Elbonians* on US soil be eligible, but a baby born to a pair of Americans who were on vacation in Elbonia not be eligible?

This is why I am not a lawyer. I want things to make sense.

*Yes, I am trying to be non-offensive by picking a non-existent country.

710 Panhandler  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:16:01pm

re: #704 razorbacker

Think of the status points. "Dude capped me with a Kimber man! Made my Tec look like I was still in school."

711 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:16:43pm

re: #699 Wishing
Peon! Occasional Reader got a fancy schmancy 1911 .45!

712 Mel Lono  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:17:38pm

re: #701 nightwatch

Nothing on the local news. If its in NHolly, red should be right in the middle of it too.

713 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:17:51pm

re: #707 lostlakehiker

Estimates are all over the map. 146 is higher than any I've heard. But look: all the candidates have above-average intelligence, even the genuine idiots.

Those ads for internet IQ tests I keep seeing claim 0bama's IQ is 124.

Yeah, they're just internet ads, but they're as valid as any other source I've found on this issue.
;)

714 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:18:17pm

re: #669 fiat_lux

Somebody down dinged me. I 'm newby. Don't know what I did wrong.

715 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:19:44pm

re: #714 fiat_lux

Somebody down dinged me. I 'm newby. Don't know what I did wrong.

Maybe a PETA supporter/troll pissed at your avatar.

716 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:19:48pm

re: #704 razorbacker

I don't even know anyone worthy of being shot by a $1441 pistol.

I think of all the money I saved by not having a pistol all these years... rationalization! A wonderful evolutionary trait.

717 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:20:10pm

re: #714 fiat_lux

Somebody down dinged me. I 'm newby. Don't know what I did wrong.

LGF is a tough room.

718 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:20:39pm

re: #715 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Maybe a PETA supporter/troll pissed at your avatar.

Or you could read his comment history and find his faux-coyness irritating.

719 lostlakehiker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:20:51pm

re: #644 mich-again

Cool. But its funny that we always hear how humans haven't evolved as a species in the last couple thousand years. Whoever Jesus was, he likely had 10 fingers and toes and 2 eyes that worked. But in less than 4,000 times that same time span humans and apes became completely different species from a common parent species through purely random genetic mutations. I'm not so sure.

Random is too often used as a crutch for "I don't understand how.."

It wasn't the random mutations that did it. It was the nonrandom selective pressures that favored certain trends. The other apes don't have our hips. We're good walkers. So, say you have a population of sort-of-chimplike apes, and some of them find themselves living in an ever sparser open forest as the climate changes. There's no way to survive, just sticking to one little motte. Ya gotta walk to the next one, where there's still some fruit. And then the next, etc.

That population is now in a situation that every little variation that helps with long distance walking is favored. As the little variations crop up, some one way and some the other, the ones that are better for forest dwelling get weeded out, while the ones that favor distance walking multiply and spread in the population. Pretty soon (on the time scales we're talking) you've got a new species. Apicus walkikus, if you like. The details you can read about in the texts or in wikipedia.

720 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:20:53pm

re: #711 realwest

Peon! Occasional Reader got a fancy schmancy 1911 .45!

But the Les Baer/Ed Brown crowd would still look down their noses at me.

721 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:21:01pm

Russia Rocked by Financial Crisis

As the ruble slides, Russian banks, companies, and households are converting their cash into dollars.

Why not euros? Or yen? Or whateveritis that China uses?

*don't bother. I know why.*

722 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:21:14pm

re: #696 Sharmuta

Yeah. that video was like watching something from high school -- the "in crowd" suddenly decides that "doing/saying X" is "way cool, man" -- and then insists on doing a tally to find out just how many "do and say" the "cool thing" -- and when, according to their "survey" (one wonders just how "unbiased" that survey was) they find out that all the "cool" people do/say X ("Yeah, we're all atheists!"), then it becomes mandatory that everyone do the same...or else (the essence of being an adolescent). (and the only unanswered/unresolved question is "what will they do with the non-conformists?" i don't want to know/find out...)

723 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:21:37pm

re: #698 Panhandler
But being a Brigade Commander doesn't preclude you from being a football hero!
Does the Navy really refer to it's cadets as "Brigades"?
Seems to me that they'd be called something more - I dunno - Navy like.
But what about the O and D lines, hmmm?! That's where football games are won or lost.

724 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:22:51pm

re: #718 Sharmuta

Or you could read his comment history and find his faux-coyness irritating.

Well, I don't recall reading any of their comments, so I guess that's very possible.

725 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:23:07pm

re: #703 Maximu§
Hey that's great news! Please be sure to thank him for us for serving our nation!

726 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:23:37pm

re: #716 Occasional Reader

I think of all the money I saved by not having a pistol all these years... rationalization! A wonderful evolutionary trait.

If I meet someone really, really, really deserving to be shot, can I ask them to wait whilst I call you?

*Wait here, would ya bud? All I gots is this here cheapo shotgun, but I know a guy...*

727 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:24:03pm

re: #700 Ozark Mountain Daredevil


I'm still running XP SP2, even though I know there's an SP3. If it ain't broke, why attempt to fix it?

FWIW, I have XP Pro on my desktop. Installed SP3 the week it came out, and haven't a problem with it yet. Apparently it fixes a bunch of security weaknesses, and I figure I should be as secure as possible, especially when sometimes I follow links from here or Jawa that go to sites in the ME or Russia.

728 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:24:27pm

re: #724 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

You could always check the karma...

729 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:25:16pm

re: #720 Occasional Reader
Oh gosh, I don't even know who the "Les Baer/Ed Brown crowd" is!

730 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:25:34pm

re: #649 realwest

Hah! Starting with Syrah's #554 on down, it's obvious that Syrah and I are communicating on the same plane, irregardless of your grammer police methods!
LOL!
;')

BTW - how are you doing tonight?

rw, I have not taken any issue with you on whether you and Syrah get along or not. I merely pointed out how you bit on Syrah's delightfully facetious answer she gave your open-ended question, and now I'm the devil personified?

Lighten up, Francis.

731 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:25:49pm

re: #722 J.S.

(and the only unanswered/unresolved question is "what will they do with the non-conformists?" i don't want to know/find out...)

In high school, I was part of a group that was non-conformist. (wait...what?)

732 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:25:55pm

re: #724 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

Well, I don't recall reading any of their comments, so I guess that's very possible.

And I don't search others' comment histories even if I disagree with some or a lot of their posts. I have better things to do with my time.

733 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:25:57pm

re: #686 Salamantis

By analyzing DNA from people in all regions of the world, geneticist Spencer Wells has concluded that all humans alive today are descended from a single man who lived in Africa around 60,000 years ago.

By any chance did that guy's wife like to eat apples?

734 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:26:39pm

re: #726 razorbacker

If I meet someone really, really, really deserving to be shot, can I ask them to wait whilst I call you?

Sorry, my "contract killer" days are behind me.

/

735 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:27:01pm

re: #727 stevieray
Yeah, but SP3 apparently can cause problems with an XP machine using AMD chips, not Intel.

736 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:27:13pm

re: #729 realwest

Oh gosh, I don't even know who the "Les Baer/Ed Brown crowd" is!

Both are names of REALLY fancy, ultra-custom M1911s, that can run up to $3K or more.

737 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:27:37pm

re: #714 fiat_lux

Somebody down dinged me. I 'm newby. Don't know what I did wrong.

Lawsy! That's gotta be some kind of record bad Karma for a newbie.

Wear it with pride.

738 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:28:19pm

re: #675 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

President Biden?

YIKES ! ! !

739 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:28:55pm

re: #730 LeePro

rw, I have not taken any issue with you on whether you and Syrah get along or not. I merely pointed out how you bit on Syrah's delightfully facetious answer she gave your open-ended question, and now I'm the devil personified?

Lighten up, Francis.

I confess,

I have a particular weakness when it comes to being presented with a [(yes-no)/or] question.

740 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:29:14pm

re: #735 realwest

Yeah, but SP3 apparently can cause problems with an XP machine using AMD chips, not Intel.

Good point! There was mega agita over that little screw up!

741 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:29:18pm

re: #727 stevieray

FWIW, I have XP Pro on my desktop. Installed SP3 the week it came out, and haven't a problem with it yet. Apparently it fixes a bunch of security weaknesses, and I figure I should be as secure as possible, especially when sometimes I follow links from here or Jawa that go to sites in the ME or Russia.

But SP3 would only include fixing security weaknesses in IE, wouldn't it? I use Firefox 70% and Safari 30%.

742 nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:30:38pm

re: #712 Mel Lono My wiff was washing the truck on the lawn at approx 1300hr
when a "YOUT" of a non stated nature bolted past her and jumped the neighbor's gate in an apparent "evasive" move thus setting off a flurry of black and white activity that lasted many minutes...the 3 stripe that searched my back yard did comment on my "COOL" tree-fort that I had built for me kiddo's 7 years back. Now the AIR has swooped again causing my reflex posture...sometimes, I just go out with socks and the Tanto 6 inch, just for practice. My wife...just shakes her head. Such as it is in these parts...

743 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:30:44pm

re: #719 lostlakehiker

It wasn't the random mutations that did it.

Wooah. Hit the brakes right there. I have argued the point many times here that genetic mutations in a species aren't necessarily random and have been subsequently smacked down enough times to know that any mutations are indeed purely random in nature.

744 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:30:51pm

re: #713 gmsc Much more Impressive than Obama's 124 IQ is Biden's 1760 on his SAT. I wish id been able to score above max possible score when I took mine.

745 J.S.  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:31:11pm

re: #731 gmsc

ah..that's funny...(wonder if that could also describe the scientists who are the proselytizers for atheism...)

746 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:31:53pm

re: #735 realwest

Yeah, but SP3 apparently can cause problems with an XP machine using AMD chips, not Intel.

And my computer has an AMD chip.
/I prefer chocolate.

747 stevieray  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:32:34pm

re: #741 Ozark Mountain Daredevil

But SP3 would only include fixing security weaknesses in IE, wouldn't it? I use Firefox 70% and Safari 30%.

Hmmm... I guess so. I read the release notes for the different upgrades, but its all beyond my current comprehension level.

748 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:33:01pm

re: #675 Ozark Mountain Daredevil As was pointed out to me the other day in the Nirth cert thread Electoral college doesn't make presidency official til DEC 15.

749 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:33:09pm

re: #705 Syrah No, it takes, iirc, 4 of the Justices to review a petition and agree that it be heard by the entire court. Course there are special exemptions (usually having to do with the speed with which a case must be handled, I think) but no, one Justice can't compel the rest of the Court to hear it.
I once did a petition for a writ of certiorari to SCOTUS on a Murder I case (I was in law school legal aid) and we lost our hearing but did get 3 Justices to agree to take the case.

750 Occasional Reader  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:33:36pm

And... that's a wrap. Good night.

751 Ozark Mountain Daredevil  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:33:45pm

re: #748 rancher

Did your kid ever get registered?

752 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:34:29pm

Windows is OK. Linux is not for everybody.

753 Panhandler  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:34:33pm

re: #714 fiat_lux

Somebody down dinged me. I 'm newby. Don't know what I did wrong.

So fiat_lux and Blue Canuk hold the first Aurorea Borealis Lizard meeting. Everything goes swimmingly, although fiat can't understand why anybody would drink Molson and Blue takes a while to get his mind around the idea that someone would order walrus blood neat. All in all a good gettogether until they adjourned to the parking lot.

754 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:35:48pm

re: #745 J.S.

ah..that's funny...(wonder if that could also describe the scientists who are the proselytizers for atheism...)

Originally, to join the group, we wanted people to swear an oath, but we could never find one suitable for non-conformists.
;)

"I promise to be different!
I promise to be unique!
I promise not to repeat things other people say!"
-Steve Martin

755 Moody Leo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:37:04pm

re: #706 LeePro oh well, I saw some articles on [Link: www.thedeadpelican.com...]
but they are gone now. but I always scroll down to the newspapers and TV/radio stations and check them out.

756 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:37:38pm

re: #730 LeePro
a. My name ain't francis
b. I said Syrah and I were communicating on the same plane, NOT whether or not we get along.
c. I threw in the "irregardless" for the same reason that
d. I put in the LOL and the ;').

757 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:38:05pm

re: #751 Ozark Mountain Daredevil
Lol Not yet this is rustler BTW Rancher was out cold by like 2030.

758 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:38:54pm

re: #739 Syrah

I confess,

I have a particular weakness when it comes to being presented with a [(yes-no)/or] question.

Loved it, Syrah!
;D

759 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:39:47pm

re: #717 Syrah

Syrah, I know It's a tough room. Ozark mountain Daredevil, PETA could not have a problem with my avatar: It is nature at it's rawest. The eater, the eaten and one who is waiting f r the scraps. I have no faux-ness.

760 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:40:04pm

re: #736 Occasional Reader
$3k or more? For that kind of dough they should shoot on their own, always hit the right target and clean and oil themselves! LOL.
Seriously, what would make a 1911 .45 worth Three Thousand Dollars?!

761 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:40:05pm

re: #757 rancher

Lol Not yet this is rustler BTW Rancher was out cold by like 2030.

I've got an unused nic he can have.

Pretty cool one, too.

762 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:40:52pm

re: #759 fiat_lux

I have no faux-ness.

Your posting history suggests otherwise.

763 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:40:57pm

re: #756 realwest

I think the Francis reference has something to do with the movie Stripes. Bat that means whoever used that line must be Sergeant Hulka or one of his minions.

764 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:41:23pm

Well technically I have a registered account just can't activate it.
Rustler

765 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:42:07pm

Lol Sgt Houka was the Bong. I mean bomb.

766 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:42:11pm

re: #714 fiat_lux
Well since you have a negative karma of 477, a whole lot of folks have dinged you down - at least 477 more than have dinged you up.

767 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:43:06pm

re: #759 fiat_lux

Syrah, I know It's a tough room. Ozark mountain Daredevil, PETA could not have a problem with my avatar: It is nature at it's rawest. The eater, the eaten and one who is waiting f r the scraps. I have no faux-ness.

You could ask your down-dinger directly.

Sharmuta is about as direct and forthright as they get here. If she dinged you down, she had a reason.

768 BignJames  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:43:32pm

re: #753 Panhandler

Parking lot?

769 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:43:56pm

re: #737 razorbacker

I do! I think I have the record for going in the dumper!

770 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:43:57pm

re: #767 Syrah

Sharmuta is about as direct and forthright as they get here. If she dinged you down, she had a reason.

Moi?!

771 mich-again  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:44:28pm

I now stand at 5997 Karma, who wansabee 6K man? Step right up beezotches.

772 BignJames  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:44:54pm

re: #760 realwest

$3k or more? For that kind of dough they should shoot on their own, always hit the right target and clean and oil themselves! LOL.
Seriously, what would make a 1911 .45 worth Three Thousand Dollars?!


Comes with a car?

773 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:45:35pm

re: #739 Syrah
Ah, ok. Thanks, I'll keep that in mind for future reference.

774 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:45:39pm

re: #769 fiat_lux

I do! I think I have the record for going in the dumper!

Please- we've seen "better". So don't give yourself airs.

775 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:46:14pm

-619 with 18 comments. That'll be hard to beat.

776 Panhandler  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:46:34pm

re: #771 mich-again
You got 5997 karma but I'm going to WH for brekkies tomorrow before the Toys for Tots ride. Snark

777 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:46:50pm

re: #770 Sharmuta

Moi?!

Why did the image of a blond haired smurfette thumbing through a "troll cook-book" flash through my mind?

I wonder.

778 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:47:36pm

re: #777 Syrah

lol

779 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:50:03pm

re: #739 Syrah

I confess,

I have a particular weakness when it comes to being presented with a [(yes-no)/or] question.

re: #773 realwest

Ah, ok. Thanks, I'll keep that in mind for future reference.

Ahhh.
Righteous acknowledgment.

/heh

780 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:50:51pm

Ed Browns 1911's are pretty bits of work

781 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:51:33pm

re: #760 realwest

$3k or more? For that kind of dough they should shoot on their own, always hit the right target and clean and oil themselves! LOL.
Seriously, what would make a 1911 .45 worth Three Thousand Dollars?!

They will shoot better than I can. But so will my custom Colt. ($925)

782 Wishing  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:51:42pm

Gnite all

783 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:51:44pm

re: #777 Syrah

Why did the image of a blond haired smurfette thumbing through a "troll cook-book" flash through my mind?

I wonder.

re: #778 Sharmuta

lol

lol2

784 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:52:47pm

re: #763 mich-again
Yeah, I know that. Thanks mich-again.

785 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:53:50pm

Mich-

First- congrats on the karmic milestone.

Second- I hope you have or do go back and watch the rest of the video. While you may not agree with everything you hear, you might hear something with which you do agree, or will otherwise give you food for thought. I enjoyed the discussion overall, and hope that the future will hold more discussions like this. I see the benefit of it, and I hope if you give it the chance, you will too.

786 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:54:30pm

re: #782 Wishing

Gnite all

Good night, Wishing!

787 realwest  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:55:38pm

Well all y'all - time for me to get some sleep. I hope you all have a GREAT EVENING/EARLY MORNING and that I get the chance to speak with you all down the road.

Good night, all.

788 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:55:45pm

Les Baer's custumized pistols The anniverasy 1911 runs almost $7k.

789 Pvt Bin Jammin  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:56:33pm

What's up, lizards?

790 gmsc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:57:02pm

re: #789 Pvt Bin Jammin

What's up, lizards?

Just about anything.

791 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:57:44pm

re: #762 Sharmuta

Faux-ness would suggest that I am insincere. My posting history will not reveal otherwise.

792 Pvt Bin Jammin  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:58:07pm

re: #790 gmsc

I'm sure you are right. LOL Reading backwards on the thread.

793 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:58:27pm

re: #789 Pvt Bin Jammin

We have morphed to 1911's and all their redux glory...


still like the Glock 40'

794 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 10:59:19pm

re: #733 mich-again

By any chance did that guy's wife like to eat apples?

Dunno, but Mitochondrial Eve lived at least 50000 years BEFORE Y-Chromosomal Adam.

795 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:00:06pm

I'm not to fond of glocks they just dont feel right.

796 mattThaHatter  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:00:20pm

?re: #55 yah

Sweet! I guess my Mom is wrong, and if I can just steal ...oh, cough cough... I mean if I can just buy a suit, then perhaps I am not destined to die alone! Maybe the justice system isn't as bad as I told that judge it was right before throwing that chair at him. I feel bad for that now; I hope the therapy works and he's able to walk again. I should send him a new pair of Adidas crosstrainers, huh?re: #55 yah

797 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:02:06pm

re: #795 rancher


So, I'll be honest. Could not afford the Kimber I REALLY wanted!...:)

798 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:02:08pm

I'm not really a 'gun person'. Don't get me wrong, if ever I should find myself in the unfortunate situation that requires The Law to bust down the door they'll be able to display enough to make the usual crowd *tsk, tsk*.

But I've only ever bought two. All the rest have been gifted me, or left me by dead relatives, or finally been taken in lieu of payment once I dispaired of getting actual money.

So, while I will poke gentle fun at those who buy multithousanddollar shooting irons, I get it. I just wouldn't do it.

Just like I wouldn't buy a car costing more than $71,275. But I understand those who do.

799 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:02:37pm

re: #791 fiat_lux

Faux-ness would suggest that I am insincere. My posting history will not reveal otherwise.

Right.

800 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:03:11pm

re: #791 fiat_lux

A karmic quotient of -1.95 is pretty suggestive of something.

What did you say to get the Lizards so worked up?

801 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:03:23pm

re: #743 mich-again

Wooah. Hit the brakes right there. I have argued the point many times here that genetic mutations in a species aren't necessarily random and have been subsequently smacked down enough times to know that any mutations are indeed purely random in nature.

You were arguing for a different thing than Lost Lake Hiker was. He was arguing that the nonrandom environmental selection from between available random mutations did it; that's classic Darwinism. You were arguing that the environment was reaching into the genome and CAUSING specific mutations rather than others to occur; that is classic (and long-discredited) Lamarckianism.

802 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:03:29pm
803 BlueCanuck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:03:44pm

Evening all. Night shift checking in, finally. Sometimes work sucks. Anything I should be aware of?

804 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:03:48pm

re: #800 Syrah

Click the link above.

805 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:05:23pm

re: #798 razorbacker


So...ya saying the Glock 40 ain't a bad shooting iron? Or you gonna pass on the judgement?

806 CharlieBravo  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:06:02pm

Well, he knows whales were land animals. He knows Christian and Muslim fundamentalists are equally dangerous (not sure how he figures that). He knows he doesn't know anything outside his area of expertise. He knows Fox News is --- what? Something the world would be better off without? He knows if Creationists (now called Interventionists?) get their way Scientific investigation will somehow be ended (no idea how he figures that either).

807 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:06:18pm

re: #803 BlueCanuck

Evening all. Night shift checking in, finally. Sometimes work sucks. Anything I should be aware of?

Don't cross Occasional Reader.

Souped up Colt .45s are pricey.

Apparently you and a polar bear have played ring-around-the-SUV.

But no, not really.

808 Pvt Bin Jammin  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:06:25pm

re: #793 Nightwatch

I like those Glocks too.

Wish I could remember the details but around ten years ago they had that "million mom" march against guns and at the same time the police agencies in our area were down on the cops purchasing Glocks or Baretta's. I got pretty buzzed on the night before the march, came home and made a huge sign which I hung on the fence of this ugly condemned property next door..."Mother's For Glocks and Barettas". LOL It stayed up for months and the cops loved it.

809 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:07:29pm

To be fair to fiat_lux, I did receive an apology for the rude comments.

810 SurferDoc  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:07:40pm

re: #803 BlueCanuck

Evening all. Night shift checking in, finally. Sometimes work sucks. Anything I should be aware of?

I'd say rape, pillage and the hanging of the the brigands--but that would be a lie.
Hiyas!

811 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:07:41pm

re: #804 Sharmuta

Click the link above.

I did.

It was . . . indicative.

812 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:08:53pm

re: #805 Nightwatch

So...ya saying the Glock 40 ain't a bad shooting iron? Or you gonna pass on the judgement?

I've not shot the .40.

But the Glock that I've shot seemed okay. I'd have bought a Ruger, and spent the change on...well...something else, but that's just my pennypinching nature emerging.

813 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:09:11pm

re: #799 Sharmuta

Right.

Heh!
What s/he said...

...suggest that I am insincere. My posting history will not reveal otherwise.
814 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:09:35pm

re: #795 rancher


Sorry to double post, try Uncle Mike's rubber slip ons and the grip is very nice indeed! Specially for the large handed among us...;)

815 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:09:43pm

re: #811 Syrah

And here's a thread before that where our own Rancher Rustler tried to enlighten and did a good job.

816 BlueCanuck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:10:23pm

re: #807 razorbacker

Don't cross Occasional Reader.

Souped up Colt .45s are pricey.

Apparently you and a polar bear have played ring-around-the-SUV.

But no, not really.

Before I head on up to the new thread.

1.) Why?
2.) No kidding.
3.) That's not true, and I burned the negatives.

817 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:12:28pm

re: #799 Sharmuta

Yeah. my posting history does not suggest o otherwise

818 razorbacker  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:12:52pm

re: #816 BlueCanuck

Before I head on up to the new thread.

1.) Why?
2.) No kidding.
3.) That's not true, and I burned the negatives.

#694

Way.

#753

819 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:13:01pm

Glocks aren't bad shooters they just feel odd to me. Only real reason for a glock is if you want to sneak a piece on a plane and that actually still requires additional mods. You will likely get better bang for your buck with a different brand.

820 LeePro  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:13:13pm

re: #789 Pvt Bin Jammin

re: #803 BlueCanuck

{PBJ}
{Blue}

Can't believe I beat y'all here!

I'm still playing Arrive Late, Catch-Up, Talk Fast, Go-to-Bed!

821 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:13:25pm

re: #809 Sharmuta

To be fair to fiat_lux, I did receive an apology for the rude comments.

After I called him out on them.

822 Panhandler  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:13:50pm

re: #816 BlueCanuck

Before I head on up to the new thread.

3.) That's not true, and I burned the negatives.


# 753 this thread, you missed one

823 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:15:06pm

BBIAB all work is calling for a bit and need to do some walking knees are stiffening.

824 Pvt Bin Jammin  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:15:11pm

re: #820 LeePro

"I'm still playing Arrive Late, Catch-Up, Talk Fast, Go-to-Bed!"

I thought that was my thing. LOL

Good to see all of you.

825 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:15:20pm

re: #808 Pvt Bin Jammin

The SW40 is a fine round for defense, specially if you go Corbon or wad-cutters. Pre-ban TALONS are the ultimate but if you have friends in Law-Enforcement...they might give you the brotherly ...:[ WTF?

826 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:15:27pm

re: #800 Syrah

I don't believe in conventional evolution theory

827 Sharmuta  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:16:28pm

re: #817 fiat_lux

I've provided the links and will let other decide for themselves. But I don't find you to be sincere. I can't say if your apology to me was sincere or not, but I did appreciate the gesture.

828 BlueCanuck  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:19:13pm

re: #818 razorbacker

re: #822 Panhandler

Thanks guys. :D


/needed a good chuckle and that got it.
//but I am not THAT far north yet.

829 Pvt Bin Jammin  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:20:10pm

re: #825 Nightwatch

Wish we had some of those. Daughter's not a cop any more and our cop buddies are all retired. :( Oh well.

830 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:20:13pm

re: #812 razorbacker


Serious, try the 40 with Uncle Mike slip on. If of course your big handed!
2 inch groups a combat range or my name is Charles...

831 barere  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:20:17pm

Ricky Gervais on the Bible:
Likely to offend. But absolutely hilarious.

832 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:21:05pm

re: #826 fiat_lux

I don't believe in conventional evolution theory

Like the fellow in the video said: it's not a matter of believing or not believing (something that's done in the absence of empirical evidence); it's a matter of accepting the empirical evidence with which one is presented.

And that empirical evidence is overwhelming. And ALL of it favors evolutionary theory, and NONE of it contradicts the theory.

833 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:22:05pm

re: #829 Pvt Bin Jammin


One box left but NEVER loaded. I have friends on LAPD

834 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:28:10pm

Just get a 45 and shoot soup bowls.

835 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:28:55pm

re: #819 rancher


Not so, most PD's go Glock but in the 9mm. Shit round that over penetrates and never KNOCKS DOWN the perp! 40's or 45's! THATS law enforcement!

836 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:29:51pm

Here's a thought experiment:

Imagine if it was written in the Bible that the Holy Attraction of God's Love was the only thing that kept us from falling away into the empty sky. Do you think that some people would be pitching the same fits about Newton and Einstein that they are pitching about Darwin and Mendel? I think they would. They would be calling themselves Divine Adherentists or something, and ranting about the Godless Newtonists and Einsteinians.

837 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:30:34pm

re: #834 rancher

Funding on a E.R nurse's salary...do the math...:)

838 Pvt Bin Jammin  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:31:23pm

re: #833 Nightwatch

Hmmm, KMA (is it KMA367)? Daughter was there along with our friends. We live in sheriff territory but I have to say, they are pretty cool too.

839 Salamantis  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:32:55pm

Those damn Atheist Gravitationists!

/

840 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:37:23pm

re: #838 Pvt Bin Jammin


No, my wife's uncle who has a MOST awesome collection of firearms,
gave me the box years back. I hold it mostly because of the gift aspect.
And the box stays closed because of my friends in the LAPD.

841 Nightwatch  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:43:20pm

Well since there is no work in the morning,
I think I will will sneak to the over-night thread...look out...here I post!

842 Syrah  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:45:35pm

re: #826 fiat_lux

I don't believe in conventional evolution theory

Stumbling blocks are not helpful.

Creation is a marvel. It should not be made into a distraction.

843 rancher  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:46:51pm

Btw if you want black talons Ranger SXT(same exact thing) (actually superior expantion technology) rounds are essentially Black talons without the lublox coating that gave black talons there black color. They have the same star shaped incisions and expantion capability just lack the lublox coating which protected the barrel of the weapon.

844 Pvt Bin Jammin  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:47:06pm

re: #840 Nightwatch

I'm with you. Most of the guns we have were given to us by those retired guys. One of them has never even been fired before. LOL I am so bad I don't think I have any ammo in the house right now. So much for being a gun owner.

I just looked it up. It is KMA 367.

'Nite.

845 fiat_lux  Sat, Dec 6, 2008 11:56:46pm

re: #821 Salamantis

No, that was on my own. I earnestly believe I was out of line and I once again, apologize.

846 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 12:11:22am

re: #827 Sharmuta

Sharmuta, my apology to you was sincere and came from my heart. I was way out of line when our differences became heated and I over reacted.I hope that in the future we can discuss differences without personal attacks, of which I am guilty.

847 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 12:27:28am

re: #842 Syrah

I agree whole heartedly. I think the we should back up re-examine the record anew.

848 Syrah  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 12:37:00am

re: #847 fiat_lux

I agree whole heartedly. I think the we should back up re-examine the record anew.

How are you agreeing? How would it be helpful to "back up re-examine the record anew".

What is your goal?

849 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:00:29am

I have no goal other than to look at the geologic record and the geologic record shows a series of fully formed creatures with no intermediates. Intermediates should be in the same proportion as the other fossils.

850 Syrah  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:12:33am

re: #849 fiat_lux

I have no goal other than to look at the geologic record and the geologic record shows a series of fully formed creatures with no intermediates. Intermediates should be in the same proportion as the other fossils.

And you wonder why you get down-dinged?

851 Salem  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:14:06am

re: #849 fiat_lux

I have no goal other than to look at the geologic record and the geologic record shows a series of fully formed creatures with no intermediates. Intermediates should be in the same proportion as the other fossils.

Don't insist that children in public schools be subjected to your willful stupidity and you can believe in any shamefully infantile garbage you want.

852 Mr Secul  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:16:10am

re: #849 fiat_lux

I have no goal other than to look at the geologic record and the geologic record shows a series of fully formed creatures with no intermediates. Intermediates should be in the same proportion as the other fossils.

People have posted you links to instances of transitional fossils, you have read some of the links.

Why do you say that there are no intermediates?

What do you mean when you use the term intermediate?

Are you using the word in an unusual way or in a different sense from its obvious meaning?

853 Syrah  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:19:04am

re: #852 Mr Secul

I don't think he plays straight.

854 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:24:22am

No I do not wonder why I get down-dinged. I know why. I expect it. Where did I say wonder why I am getting down-dinged? I am not challenging you, I just don't want you to confuse me with others. : )

855 Mr Secul  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:26:01am

re: #853 Syrah

I don't think he plays straight.

I don't think he does either.

I like how you started out giving him the benefit of the doubt but he quickly put an end to that. :-)

856 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:34:47am

re: #849 fiat_lux

I have no goal other than to look at the geologic record and the geologic record shows a series of fully formed creatures with no intermediates. Intermediates should be in the same proportion as the other fossils.

So you wanna forget everything we've figured out about the painstakingly meticulous series of transitional fossils we've discovered, completely wipe our genetic and morphological knowledge away, and start over from the 10th century?

Fat chance. Knowledge discovered cannot be willfully unlearned. Nor should it be.

857 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:38:44am

re: #851 Salem

I don't want any child to be subjected to my willful stupitidiy and yes, I am able to believe in any shameful garbage I want.

858 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:43:45am

re: #849 fiat_lux

I have no goal other than to look at the geologic record and the geologic record shows a series of fully formed creatures with no intermediates. Intermediates should be in the same proportion as the other fossils.

See? You've alrady determined what will be seen even before anyone takes a second look. That's the logical and empirical fallacy of beginning at your conclusion and choosing your interpretation of the evidence in order to get you there. While in fact, scientists have taken millions upon millions of looks at the components of the fossil record, and their overwhelming conclusion, drawn from the empirical evidence rather than imposed upon it, is that many of the species they have carefully perused have evolved into other species - and they can point to exactly where the changing skeletal configurations over geological time indicate precisely that.

They're not about to shut their open eyes to salve your dogmatic sensibilities.

859 Salem  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:44:37am

re: #857 fiat_lux

I don't want any child to be subjected to my willful stupitidiy and yes, I am able to believe in any shameful garbage I want.

Fine. Knock yourself out, idiot.

860 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:48:28am

re: #853 Syrah

I play as straight anyone you will encounter on LGF

861 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:51:06am

re: #855 Mr Secul

Yes I always get the benefit of the doubt. Then I screw it up.

862 Syrah  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:53:04am

re: #854 fiat_lux

No I do not wonder why I get down-dinged. I know why. I expect it. Where did I say wonder why I am getting down-dinged? I am not challenging you, I just don't want you to confuse me with others. : )

I would hope that you could at the very least track your own thread.

re: #714 fiat_lux

Somebody down dinged me. I 'm newby. Don't know what I did wrong.

As for confusing you with others? I wonder. Is there something sockpuppety about you? Probably not, but I wonder.

You don't play straight. That is enough for me.

In this kind of forum, we have to be able to trust in and rely on the integrity of the other posters. You make that difficult. Very difficult.

I am done with you for this evening.

863 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:55:38am

re: #852 Mr Secul

When I say intermediate, I mean a fossil that ha an ancestor and a successor. They should be plentiful.

864 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:57:40am

re: #859 Salem

Thank you for defining me as an idiot. I get your point.

865 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:08:03am

Still bracketting the philosophical questions Salamatis?

Tsk tsk...Confucious say, "Man who use Ockham's Razor too much may castrate self."

866 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:09:46am

re: #856 Salamantis

I just don't believe youv'e found all the transitional fossils you have claimed

867 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:10:47am

re: #863 fiat_lux

When I say intermediate, I mean a fossil that ha an ancestor and a successor. They should be plentiful.

Every fossil had ancestors. All who succeeded in reproducing had successors. But what you mean are transitional fossils. And on this site, in previous threads, you have previously requested, and been presented with, numerous links to several series of transitional fossils. I know, because I'm one of the people who has gone to the time and trouble to chase down the links for you. Once they are posted for you, you either dismiss, deny, or ignore them. Then you ask for the same damned thing again, as if history hasn't happened or people don't have memories of the last time on your twisted little merry-go-round.

That's disingenuous and dishonest game-playing. It's repeatedly requesting an identical effort from us that we know in advance, from bitter experience will be wasted on you. It indicts your integrity, destroys your credibility, and it will win you no friends here worth having - or anywhere, really. It would be insane for us to continue to do the same thing for you, over and over again, and expect a different result. All that your cynical little treadmill results in is justifiably pissing people off at you.

868 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:15:24am

re: #849 fiat_lux There is evidence of intermediary and transitional species. We have been over this previously and when it's beleived only about .01% of all species which have existed have left fossil records it's quite easy to miss transitional species especially when you concider that transitional species have some characteristics of the new species and are often confused as a seperate subspecies or thought to have been damaged in the fossilization process or by the pressures bebeath the earth after fossilization. Yes I'm late but thought this thread had died long ago.
Rustler

869 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:15:34am

re: #865 jeremy1013

Still bracketting the philosophical questions Salamatis?

Tsk tsk...Confucious say, "Man who use Ockham's Razor too much may castrate self."

Thomas Kuhn has said, in The Essential Tension, his followup to The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, that in thought experiments, "nature and conceptual apparatus are jointly implicated", which is why Einstein was able to employ them so effectively.

870 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:17:01am

If you are done with me , fine. I wish you hang around and challenge on my beliefs.

871 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:18:42am

re: #868 Rancher

There is evidence of intermediary and transitional species. We have been over this previously and when it's beleived only about .01% of all species which have existed have left fossil records it's quite easy to miss transitional species especially when you concider that transitional species have some characteristics of the new species and are often confused as a seperate subspecies or thought to have been damaged in the fossilization process or by the pressures bebeath the earth after fossilization. Yes I'm late but thought this thread had died long ago.
Rustler

He's just jerking you around, Rustler. Yet again. By asking, yet again, for the same damn thing that has been provided on request to him time and time again.

872 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:20:46am

re: #870 fiat_lux

If you are done with me , fine. I wish you hang around and challenge on my beliefs.

You have amply and abundantly demonstrated that you possess no honesty whatsoever. That being the case, no one can credibly ascertain what your beliefs really are, or whether you even have any.

873 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:22:16am

re: #870 fiat_lux
You have no beliefs you said it in another thread. You are nothing more than a troll. We aren't challenging your beliefs you challenge ours and say the burden of proof is on us to provide proof which you blatently ignore. You parrot the exact same Crap 90% of the time and repeat the same question to be answered 50 different ways. Once again I'm gonna ask you to place the open hand above your forehead to catch sarcasm and ideas which are obviously over your head maybe a step ladder would help some too since they seem so far above you.

874 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:22:50am

re: #866 fiat_lux

I just don't believe youv'e found all the transitional fossils you have claimed

Don't doubt. Just believe.

It's not like you are going to convince anyone fiat_lux. Human nature is such that it makes a decision about what to believe and then justifies it by looking for evidence with its epistemic nose. Conveniently, it cannot smell anything it does not believe. The claim belief that reason will lead to evidence, and evidence will lead to certainty in what one *ought* to believe is a construct. At least the religious whackos that used to dominate civilization were honest enough to call it faith.

875 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:24:19am

re: #867 Salamantis

I didn't ask for this confrontation, but since you brought it just explain to me the ancestors and descendants of Tiktaalik.

876 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:26:33am

re: #873 Rancher

I find your lack of tolerance disturbing. When did you become such a hater? Troll indeed...

877 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:26:36am

re: #872 Salamantis

You may challenge anything you want about me, but I will fight for my honesty.

878 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:28:58am

re: #874 jeremy1013

Don't doubt. Just believe.

It's not like you are going to convince anyone fiat_lux. Human nature is such that it makes a decision about what to believe and then justifies it by looking for evidence with its epistemic nose. Conveniently, it cannot smell anything it does not believe. The claim belief that reason will lead to evidence, and evidence will lead to certainty in what one *ought* to believe is a construct. At least the religious whackos that used to dominate civilization were honest enough to call it faith.

As I said before, I have, upon request, provided links to pics of several series of transitional fossils for him already, complete with explanatory text as to where and when they were found, by who, and what it is about them that makes them transitional - in some cases complete with handy-dandy arrows pointing out the progressive morphological changes. These are not conjectural, or hypothetical, or theoretical series; they are comprised of actual, real, genuine, authentic, dug out of the damn ground fossils. I guess either his fucking finger's broken or else he's blind as a bat.

879 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:29:57am

re: #877 fiat_lux

You may challenge anything you want about me, but I will fight for my honesty.

You've already voluntarily relinquished that on here.

880 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:31:48am

re: #868 Rancher

Ok. Transitional species are missing. Where do we disagree?

881 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:35:42am

re: #876 jeremy1013 A. It's not a lack of tolerance on my part I have spent Much more time than I feel like spending showing him evidence. Yet he still wants to repeatedly ask the same question, disregard any evidence linked for him by way of saying he doesn't have the time to click a link, and has shown his own intolerance many times.

b. look at his posting history look at the posts he has made he has given up any right to civility from me already.

c. This is Rustler I have never claimed to be tolerant of trolls.

882 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:37:44am

re: #869 Salamantis

Thomas Kuhn has said, in The Essential Tension, his followup to The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, that in thought experiments, "nature and conceptual apparatus are jointly implicated", which is why Einstein was able to employ them so effectively.

Here's the point where we enter into a back and forth argument where you say it's a fact, and I say it's a belief with about the same epistemic certainty as a religious belief. The only difference is that when I quote someone, it's from the 10th century. When you quote someone, it's from the 20th...What leads you to believe that a 20th century philosopher has more authority than a 10th century philosopher?

883 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:38:16am

re: #880 fiat_lux
Some transitional species are missing others have evolutionary adaptations related to soft tissue(which doesn't fossilize) do you really want to get into this crap again Fiat. Evolution can be scene in Giraffes acquiring there long neck and tongues over time. Just because there isn't ample evidence from a 2 foot neck to 5 foot neck doesn't negate the DNA chain proving the relation.

884 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:40:46am

re: #868 Rancher

Yes, I thought this thread had died long ago. There is no way I can persuade you and your ilk to my point of view. And you will not persuede me to yours.

885 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:42:50am

re: #881 Rancher

I see. It is frustrating to have a conversation about philosophy that is posing as a conversation about science. Classic mereological problem.

886 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:43:00am

re: #875 fiat_lux

I didn't ask for this confrontation, but since you brought it just explain to me the ancestors and descendants of Tiktaalik.

[Link: www.sciencenews.org...]

excerpt:

The new remains — including most of the creature’s skull, the braincase, half of the bones in its forelimb and a quarter of its pelvic girdle — suggest that Ventastega was an evolutionary intermediate between Tiktaalik, a four-limbed fish that lived about 382 million years ago (SN: 6/17/06, p. 379), and subsequent tetrapods such as Acanthostega, which were capable of walking on land.

And then there's this, complete with eternal links:

[Link: www.nytimes.com...]

And these:

[Link: www-news.uchicago.edu...]

[Link: scienceblogs.com...]

Which you'll either deny even seeing tomorrow, or claim that it doesn't mean anything. Because that's how you fucking roll.

Now piss off.

887 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:44:24am

re: #879 Salamantis

No I haven't It is your lack of understanding that has led you to that conclusion

888 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:45:15am

re: #880 fiat_lux

Ok. Transitional species are missing. Where do we disagree?

Examples of every transitional species that has ever existed have not been found, but several pivotal series are so meticulously documented and so well filled in that it takes a special kind of olympian to deny them.

889 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:47:42am

re: #882 jeremy1013

Here's the point where we enter into a back and forth argument where you say it's a fact, and I say it's a belief with about the same epistemic certainty as a religious belief. The only difference is that when I quote someone, it's from the 10th century. When you quote someone, it's from the 20th...What leads you to believe that a 20th century philosopher has more authority than a 10th century philosopher?

They can see farther, because they're standing on the shoulders of those who came before. That is, after all, Isaac Newton's line; you gonna call him dishonest or dense?

890 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:49:41am

re: #886 Salamantis

Wow Salamantis...don't be a hater. Of course, I have no evidence to support my belief that one ought to not be a hater.

I looked at the article about Tiktaalik. There are no pictures of the actual skeletal fragments...do you have any links to them? Hopefully they are not *missing*. Ha!

Seriously though: I would like to see the bone fragments that are listed in the article.

891 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:49:49am

re: #884 fiat_lux

Yes, I thought this thread had died long ago. There is no way I can persuade you and your ilk to my point of view. And you will not persuede me to yours.

Because you have already decided that nothing can possibly persuade you. Your mind is made up, and you refuse to be confused by logic or facts.

892 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:51:56am

I Quote 19th and 20th century people because they have and had technology which those in the 10th century didn't have. The more modern Philosophers and scientists have built there research on older works and either found suficient evidence to disprove a theorum (earth centered universe) or to support older theorums(gravity). Evolution and Evolutionary Biology were recognized by the greeks under different names.

893 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:54:49am

re: #890 jeremy1013

Wow Salamantis...don't be a hater. Of course, I have no evidence to support my belief that one ought to not be a hater.

I looked at the article about Tiktaalik. There are no pictures of the actual skeletal fragments...do you have any links to them? Hopefully they are not *missing*. Ha!

Seriously though: I would like to see the bone fragments that are listed in the article.

Geez, I can't believe you're seriously trying to pass off this shit. There are FOUR articles in my post # 886. The second article has an entire fossilized head, the third has a movie you can watch at a link down on the right, and the fourth one has a whole collection of Tiktaalik fossils on display.

894 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:56:11am

re: #889 Salamantis

Um, but you aren't. You aren't standing on anyone's shoulders. Isn't that the point? You use your senses and rationally look at the *evidence* and make a rational conclusion that only morons can't see?

895 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:57:15am

Is Jeremy Fiats sock puppet? I mean neither has the time to bother clicking a link yet has time to question the subject of the links.

896 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:57:41am

From nature
the pectoral fin skeletons of Panderichthys and Tiktaalik share certain unusual features such as a blade-like radius and a longitudinal ridge-and-groove on the flexor surface of the ulna. These can tentatively be interpreted as attributes of the ‘elpistostegid’ segment of the tetrapod stem lineage and thus ancestral for the tetrapod forelimb. Given that recent phylogenies consistently place Panderichthys below Tiktaalik in the tetrapod stem group, it is surprising to discover that its pectoral fin skeleton is more limb-like than that of its supposedly more derived relative. In Tiktaalik4, like in ‘osteolepiforms’ and rhizodonts (more primitive fish members of the stem group), the ulna and ulnare are of similar size. The axis of the fin comprises two more elements distal to the ulnare, and the distal radials are arranged pinnately around this axis. In contrast, in Panderichthys and tetrapods, the ulna is much longer than the ulnare, the ulnare is the last axial element, and the distal radials/digits are arranged in a transverse fan shape11 (Fig. 3). It is difficult to say whether this character distribution implies that Tiktaalik is autapomorphic,2 that Panderichthys and tetrapods are convergent, or that Panderichthys is closer to tetrapods than Tiktaalik. At any rate, it demonstrates that the fish-tetrapod transition was accompanied by significant character incongruence in functionally important structures.

897 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:59:44am

re: #893 Salamantis

Thanks man. I'll check out those posts...sorry it irritates you.

898 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:59:58am

re: #894 jeremy1013

Um, but you aren't. You aren't standing on anyone's shoulders. Isn't that the point? You use your senses and rationally look at the *evidence* and make a rational conclusion that only morons can't see?

I'm standing on the shoulders of all who came before me, just like Newton was. I have studied the work of most of the most significant ones. Their work has informed my gaze. So perhaps it doesn't require one to be dense or visually challenged to miss what I can see; they merely have to be ignorant of what I know.

899 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:00:29am

re: #891 Salamantis

I also included you in that. Yes, I can be persueded when the evidence presents itself.

900 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:01:31am

re: #896 fiat_lux

Some evolutionary forms in transition will favor certain traits over others until such a time comes to pass that a viable transitional species has occured and can replace the older species, or move into a new previously unvisited habitat.

901 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:04:30am

re: #895 Rancher

What is a Jeremy Fiats? I have loved Dan Blocker all my life so I am conflicted.Damn!

902 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:05:27am

re: #884 fiat_lux
You could quiet easily persuade me that my beleifs are wrong all it would take is evidence that contradicts evolution. But even in your supposed disproof posts like Tiktaliik above it uses evolution to prove its point that is what convergance references in the article you posted without providing a link too.

903 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:06:54am

re: #896 fiat_lux

Evolution isn't intelligently designed. It does its own thing. And all the bogus talking points you can retrieve from creationontheweb and answersingenesis isn't gonna change that.

904 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:08:13am

re: #899 fiat_lux

I also included you in that. Yes, I can be persueded when the evidence presents itself.

You say that, but you will never grant that the evidence has presented itself. Even when every specialist in the field agrees that it has.

905 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:13:50am

re: #904 Salamantis

You say that, but you will never grant that the evidence has presented itself. Even when every specialist in the field agrees that it has.

What it amounts to when you get right down to brass tacks is that your behavior on this list has caused me to lose all respect for you, and I don't know what you can possibly do to regain it, short of acting in impeccably good faith for a long long time.

906 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:14:11am

But enough banging my head here I'm back off to the open thread.

907 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:18:20am

re: #906 Rancher

But enough banging my head here I'm back off to the open thread.

Trying to deal with brick wall brains can be frustrating...

908 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:22:29am

re: #887 fiat_lux

No I haven't It is your lack of understanding that has led you to that conclusion

No, it's been your list behavior that has led me to that conclusion.

909 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:23:50am

The pics from Pharyngula and the NYTimes of the original fossil are the best ones. But there is still a lot of the skeleton that is missing. It's not a joke that there are people trying to reconstruct what this animal looked like based on assumptions they have. We all do that. We can't lose our humble attitude that really, a lot of the final drawings are constructed based on assumptions that are less than provable.

If that makes you angry, you're just another fundamentalist.

910 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:24:23am

re: #903 Salamantis
So, is Panderichthys ancectral to Tiktaalik or not? Kind of confuses things, does it not?

911 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:27:23am

re: #908 Salamantis

No, it's been your list behavior that has led me to that conclusion.

I respect you and Sharmuta. You both bring good solid arguments to this topic. Which I stay out of because 1) I believe in evolution and 2) I know I don't have the knowledge and time to fight the flat earthers. Were do you get the energy to continue to fight these assholes?

912 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:29:56am

re: #909 jeremy1013

The pics from Pharyngula and the NYTimes of the original fossil are the best ones. But there is still a lot of the skeleton that is missing. It's not a joke that there are people trying to reconstruct what this animal looked like based on assumptions they have. We all do that. We can't lose our humble attitude that really, a lot of the final drawings are constructed based on assumptions that are less than provable.

If that makes you angry, you're just another fundamentalist.

WTF have you never put a puzzle together without a picture? Why do you guys always come to the party at the end when everyone is gone?

913 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:31:19am

re: #911 Erik The Red

Hey, Eric. Can you name one of the assholes you mentioned?

914 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:32:40am

re: #913 fiat_lux

Hey, Eric. Can you name one of the assholes you mentioned?

Look at the karma. I'll let you decide who the assholes are on these ID threads.

915 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:36:12am

I just asked a simple question. Can you you name an asshole you mentioned?

916 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:38:32am

Eric?

917 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:40:54am

re: #912 Erik The Red

I remember the first time I saw pieces of a skeleton fossil of a bird that was being reconstructed. 80% of the skeleton in the final drawing was based on the 20% (or less) they found, from pieces that could be explained in other ways. What was audacious was not that the person had come up with an educated guess, but that he was pushing it as fact. Obviously, funding is on the line here, so I don't blame him.

918 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:41:17am

re: #915 fiat_lux

I just asked a simple question. Can you you name an asshole you mentioned?

Like everything else you will not do your own research on this matter but expect others to do it for you. LOOK AT THE KARMA and you make your own informed conclusion.

919 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:43:51am

Fiat_lux:

You really shouldn't be so antagonistic to the priests scientists.

920 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:46:39am

re: #909 jeremy1013

The pics from Pharyngula and the NYTimes of the original fossil are the best ones. But there is still a lot of the skeleton that is missing. It's not a joke that there are people trying to reconstruct what this animal looked like based on assumptions they have. We all do that. We can't lose our humble attitude that really, a lot of the final drawings are constructed based on assumptions that are less than provable.

If that makes you angry, you're just another fundamentalist.

The parts that matter - the ones that are pertinent to the transitional morphological shifting, are present. The lobe fins / arms and feet, and the jaws.

921 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:46:52am

-yawn-

I'm going to bed. There's too much team spirit.


***If God is dead, someone is going to have to take his place.

-Malcom Muggeridge

922 jeremy1013  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:48:11am

Oh Salamatis. I didn't know you were here. Sorry. Thanks for the reply. We can fight over this later.

Have a good night, my friend.

923 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:48:24am

re: #919 jeremy1013

Fiat_lux:

You really shouldn't be so antagonistic to the priests scientists.

What he shouldn't do is demand evidence, then dismiss or ignore it, without rational or reasonable grounds for doing so,when it is presented to him per his request.

924 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:51:25am

Are you a real vking or re: #918 Erik The Red

Eric, with all due respect, I want to know who you consider an asshole. Do you base it on Karma? Pray tell.

925 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:54:22am

re: #910 fiat_lux

So, is Panderichthys ancectral to Tiktaalik or not? Kind of confuses things, does it not?

Yep, Panderichthys is ancestral to Tiktaalik, and Acanthostega and Ichthyostega followed Tiktaalik:

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

You may be willfully confused on this score, but the scientists aren't.

926 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:55:21am

re: #919 jeremy1013

Jeremy, You got down digend for that. Can you live with that?

927 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:55:43am

re: #924 fiat_lux

Are you a real vking or

Eric, with all due respect, I want to know who you consider an asshole. Do you base it on Karma? Pray tell.

Again looking to piss off as many people here as possible. YES based on karma, posts made and respect for your fellow Lizards.

928 Buster Bunny  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:55:57am

You know fiat_lux .. i'm just seeing your name now .. and dropping the comment down one karma notch.

Because you are pouting the usual creationist BS .. that science is the one being dismissive and the creationists cant be proven wrong regardless of how wrong they are.
Thats what makes the difference between science and creationist BS .. scientists might not like new science, but if its got any decent credo .. they'll investigate it.

creationists will be hammering people back to witchcraft and burning people at the stake for herecy if they could. As long as it agrees with the biblical definition (DESPITE what the bible says)

929 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:56:05am

re: #924 fiat_lux

Are you a real vking or

Eric, with all due respect, I want to know who you consider an asshole. Do you base it on Karma? Pray tell.

Karma is based upon others' judgments of one's list behavior. Having experienced your heinous and execrable list behavior firsthand, I consider your karma to be richly merited and deserved.

930 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 3:58:50am

re: #917 jeremy1013

I remember the first time I saw pieces of a skeleton fossil of a bird that was being reconstructed. 80% of the skeleton in the final drawing was based on the 20% (or less) they found, from pieces that could be explained in other ways. What was audacious was not that the person had come up with an educated guess, but that he was pushing it as fact. Obviously, funding is on the line here, so I don't blame him.

They have the pertinent parts of Tiktaalik.

931 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:00:35am

re: #925 Salamantis

Oh Lord, he has not resorted Wikipedia has he?

932 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:00:54am

re: #911 Erik The Red

I respect you and Sharmuta. You both bring good solid arguments to this topic. Which I stay out of because 1) I believe in evolution and 2) I know I don't have the knowledge and time to fight the flat earthers. Were do you get the energy to continue to fight these assholes?

We rent rechargeable batteries from the Energizer Bunny...;~)

933 Buster Bunny  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:04:26am

re: #931 fiat_lux

Oh Lord, he has not resorted Wikipedia has he?

Deuteronomy 5:11 .. you cretin.

934 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:05:11am

re: #927 Erik The Red

Looking to piss off as many as possible?Not the way I see it.

935 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:05:46am

re: #931 fiat_lux

Oh Lord, he has not resorted Wikipedia has he?

Go to the bottom of the page and check their links, and then tell me whether it's Nature, Scientific American, the New York Times science supplement, New Scientist Magazine, The Academy of Natural Sciences, the Chicago Tribune, The University of Chicago, or Neil Shubin's lecture and 2008 book on the subject that you have a problem with...I guess it must be all of them. Which says nothing about them, but a lot about you. And what it has to say about you is far from complimentary, and far from surprising to those of us who have experience with you.

936 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:07:00am

re: #934 fiat_lux

Looking to piss off as many as possible?Not the way I see it.

Go see your optometrist.

937 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:07:05am

re: #934 fiat_lux

Looking to piss off as many as possible?Not the way I see it.

Then you are in a minority of one in that opinion, and quite deservedly so.

938 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:09:06am

re: #928 Buster Bunny

Creationist? i think you missed something somewhere. What are you talking about and why?

939 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:09:26am

re: #934 fiat_lux

Looking to piss off as many as possible?Not the way I see it.

Come join us over in the TNDT and will see if we can "improve your karma".

940 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:10:31am

re: #939 Erik The Red

Come join us over in the TNDTLNDT and will see if we can "improve your karma".

941 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:12:24am

re: #938 fiat_lux

Creationist? i think you missed something somewhere. What are you talking about and why?

He didn't miss a thing. Not only are you a creationist, but you lie about the fact, at the very same time that you parrot their propaganda.

942 Buster Bunny  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:13:26am

re: #938 fiat_lux

Creationist? i think you missed something somewhere. What are you talking about and why?

If it looks like a duck .. quacks like a duck .. and is chased after by 30 duck loving Vietnamese gangsters .. i am guessing it just might be a duck.

Nooo i am really an Indelible Mind Moron. I believe in the possibility that it was all created by an Indelible Mind. Creationist? no .. thats a duck.

Gosh .. who do you think you are fooling?

943 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:13:28am

re: #933 Buster Bunny

I am sorry I am a cretin. I apologize to all for my cretinous.

944 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:15:59am

re: #943 fiat_lux

I am sorry I am a cretin. I apologize to all for my cretinous.

Your apologies are as insincere as all your other posts.

945 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:16:23am

re: #940 Erik The Red

Come play Fiat pretty pleeeze.

946 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:16:37am

You are beneath all shame.

947 Buster Bunny  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:17:50am

re: #943 fiat_lux

I am sorry I am a cretin. I apologize to all for my cretinous.

I believe solidly in a God that puts you on this planet for a reason. And if the god gives you 10 simple commandments which as a fun loving freakazoid animist Christian creationist, you are trying to revert me to - - it would be nice for you to at least refrain from using the lords name in vain.

Lead by example.

948 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:18:46am

re: #936 Erik The Red

Excellent come back!

949 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:20:52am

re: #948 fiat_lux

Excellent come back!

It would be vastly more excellent if you left and never came back.

950 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:25:05am

re: #946 Salamantis

You are beneath all shame.

/gee, maybe just ask Charles to give it the stick and spare the sanctimony

951 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:26:05am

re: #928 Buster Bunny

Thank you for the comment, but I am not a creationist. I know it makes it easier to identify the enemy but I ain't him

952 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:26:51am

re: #948 fiat_lux

Excellent come back!

Fiat do you comment on any other thread besides the ID ones?

953 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:27:57am

re: #951 fiat_lux

Thank you for the comment, but I am not a creationist. I know it makes it easier to identify the enemy but I ain't him

I am going to regret asking. So what are you than?

954 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:28:21am

re: #950 Killian Bundy

/gee, maybe just ask Charles to give it the stick and spare the sanctimony

Well, it IS a supporating fistula infesting the flank of this list. Although we enjoy our levity here, most of us are serious about anti-idiotarian pusuits. This rancid excrescence isn't serious about anything but trolling for lulz.

955 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:29:09am

re: #942 Buster Bunny

You can't answer you're own question.

956 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:30:22am

re: #951 fiat_lux

Thank you for the comment, but I am not a creationist. I know it makes it easier to identify the enemy but I ain't him

It lies. All the time. Glibly, shamelessly, and utterly unconvincingly.

957 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:31:15am

re: #955 fiat_lux

You can't answer you're own question.

It's a rhetorical question. You fool no one here.

958 Buster Bunny  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:32:55am

re: #955 fiat_lux

You can't answer you're own question.

I think the question wasnt meant to be answered. The answer is purely rhetorical. It takes all of 7.4 seconds to drum up a list of every comment you have EVER made on this blog. And that in itself speaks volumes.

Introspection is a bummer, eh?

959 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:35:58am

re: #958 Buster Bunny

I think the question wasnt meant to be answered. The answer is purely rhetorical. It takes all of 7.4 seconds to drum up a list of every comment you have EVER made on this blog. And that in itself speaks volumes.

Introspection is a bummer, eh?

Yeah; ain't it a bitch when the features force you to forever own all your own posts?...;~)

960 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:36:09am

re: #943 fiat_lux

Salamantis, what is your problem? You have joined the crowd. I thought you pretended to be something else

961 Buster Bunny  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:38:41am

re: #960 fiat_lux

Salamantis, what is your problem? You have joined the crowd. I thought you pretended to be something else

Beware the glib tongue of the deceiver. It comes and warns you of your own pretense, and shows none of its own hideousness in the mirror of reflection.

962 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:39:49am

re: #960 fiat_lux

Salamantis, what is your problem? You have joined the crowd. I thought you pretended to be something else

Oh puh-LEEEZE!

You are the pretender, and a damned poor one at that. Your post history is a Gordian Knot from which no straight story can be derived. You are all snark and no substance.

963 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:43:18am

re: #954 Salamantis

Well, it IS a supporating fistula infesting the flank of this list. Although we enjoy our levity here, most of us are serious about anti-idiotarian pusuits. This rancid excrescence isn't serious about anything but trolling for lulz.

/you hardly speak for LGF as a whole, only Charles speaks for LGF as a whole

964 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:43:44am

re: #953 Erik The Red

I am going to regret asking. So what are you than?

Still waiting Fiat.

965 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:45:47am

re: #963 Killian Bundy

/you hardly speak for LGF as a whole, only Charles speaks for LGF as a whole

Killian I don't know if you and Salamantis have a history but that sounded like a good comment to me.

966 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:45:48am

re: #961 Buster Bunny

Beware the glib tongue of the deceiver. It comes and warns you of your own pretense, and shows none of its own hideousness in the mirror of reflection.

Yeah; his crude and puerile "I know you are but what am I?" ripostes are as old as early grade school and as original as Joe Biden's speeches.

967 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:46:09am

re: #941 Salamantis

Sal, you do not know what you are talking about.

968 Mr Secul  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:46:18am

re: #863 fiat_lux

When I say intermediate, I mean a fossil that ha an ancestor and a successor. They should be plentiful.

That sounds very slippery.

When you mean an ancestor do you mean some other species, an ancestral species?

My impression is that you want the named species that came immediately before and the named species that came immediately after.

The vertebrate fossil record isn't fine grained enough to show immediate ancestors and descendants. I suspect that you already know that. Its why you want to restrict your definition.

There may be vertebrate examples that do what you ask but I don't know of any.

OTOH we can track changes in microfossils from marine sediment core samples. These would be things like: foraminifera, radiolaria, diatoms, and coccolithiphorids. We see lineages derive from earlier lineages, we see the starts of new species and their eventual ends.

Here is a link, it took 30 seconds of googling to find. It gives named species: ancestors and descendants.

If you want other links then Google for foraminifera, radiolaria, diatoms, and coccolithophorids. Or try some other combination: try microfossil, benthic sediments, whatever, be creative.

There are also references at the bottom of the page that I linked to.

Have a search on amazon there may be reference books on the subject. They will be dry reading but you will end up knowing more about microfossils and marine core samples than you ever wanted to know. :-) And you will be able to cite your own examples of named ancestors and descendant species.

969 golly_wog  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:47:02am

fiat_lux

If you are not a creationist, you won't mind answering these two yes or no (and that means yes or no, no quibbling) questions.

Is the earth older than 6000 years?
Are fossils antedeluvian remnants?

Yes or no?

970 Buster Bunny  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:48:12am

re: #960 fiat_lux

You know the worst thing about debating with you fiat_lux?

Its the fact that you will sit on your deplorable position REGARDLESS of anything that is said. Sure, someone may bring up something that counters anything you have said, but no, you will steamroll on regardless. Which makes talking to you an utter waste of time.

Now I work hard and my time is valuable, I sit down and value my time spent as to what is achieved on a regular basis, monetary, social, and structural.

This means that as far as am concerned, the amount of proportionate energy expenditure on you is excessive .. generous and not cost effective.

The debate from here is terminated.

971 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:48:52am

re: #944 Salamantis

Of course that was insincere .

972 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:49:34am

re: #968 Mr Secul

That sounds very slippery.

When you mean an ancestor do you mean some other species, an ancestral species?

My impression is that you want the named species that came immediately before and the named species that came immediately after.

The vertebrate fossil record isn't fine grained enough to show immediate ancestors and descendants. I suspect that you already know that. Its why you want to restrict your definition.

There may be vertebrate examples that do what you ask but I don't know of any.

OTOH we can track changes in microfossils from marine sediment core samples. These would be things like: foraminifera, radiolaria, diatoms, and coccolithiphorids. We see lineages derive from earlier lineages, we see the starts of new species and their eventual ends.

Here is a link, it took 30 seconds of googling to find. It gives named species: ancestors and descendants.

If you want other links then Google for foraminifera, radiolaria, diatoms, and coccolithophorids. Or try some other combination: try microfossil, benthic sediments, whatever, be creative.

There are also references at the bottom of the page that I linked to.

Have a search on amazon there may be reference books on the subject. They will be dry reading but you will end up knowing more about microfossils and marine core samples than you ever wanted to know. :-) And you will be able to cite your own examples of named ancestors and descendant species.

Once again the Lizards do your homework Fiat. Will you make use of it or flunk the subject once more

973 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:49:38am

re: #965 Erik The Red

Killian I don't know if you and Salamantis have a history but that sounded like a good comment to me.

Yeah, Killian harbors a dislike for me. He also harbors a disdain for the focus that Charles has given on this list to the attempts of creationists to infiltrate the US public school system. I do not think that these two things are disconnected.

974 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:50:07am

re: #965 Erik The Red

Killian I don't know if you and Salamantis have a history but that sounded like a good comment to me.

/who is we?

975 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:51:32am

re: #971 fiat_lux

Of course that was insincere .

As are you generally.

976 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:52:42am

re: #974 Killian Bundy

/who is we?

I don't see we in my comment Killian.

977 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:54:10am

re: #973 Salamantis

Yeah, Killian harbors a dislike for me. He also harbors a disdain for the focus that Charles has given on this list to the attempts of creationists to infiltrate the US public school system. I do not think that these two things are disconnected.

Right, [expletive deleted] off with your bull[expletive deleted] assumptions. You're not the Queen of the universe.

/martyrdom is yours, should you chose to accept it

978 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:54:53am

re: #974 Killian Bundy

/who is we?

What's your objection? Is it that you don't think lizards enjoy our levity, or is it that you don't think that most of us take anti-idiotarianism seriously? Which is it? Because those are the only two assertions that I made.

979 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:55:57am

re: #976 Erik The Red

I don't see we in my comment Killian.

/that's because it wasn't in your comment

980 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:56:11am

re: #977 Killian Bundy

Right, [expletive deleted] off with your bull[expletive deleted] assumptions. You're not the Queen of the universe.

/martyrdom is yours, should you chose to accept it

Tolja so, Eric. He's always trying to play snarky little gotcha games with me. Because that's just how he rolls.

981 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:56:55am

re: #977 Killian Bundy

re: #978 Salamantis

Sorry guys didn't mean to start a bar fight that is Fiat's job lately.

982 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:57:25am

re: #967 fiat_lux

Sal, you do not know what you are talking about.

Coming from the likes of you, that statement lacks all force whatsoever.

983 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:58:46am

re: #969 golly_wog

I'm just jumping in here because these sound like reasonable questions . The Earth is hunrdeds of millions of years old, I don't know exactly how many years. Most fossisl predate the Noachic flood, or the Gilgamesh flood or whichever flood you choose.

984 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:59:00am

re: #979 Killian Bundy

/that's because it wasn't in your comment

You quoted me sorry.

985 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:59:39am

re: #978 Salamantis

What's your objection? Is it that you don't think lizards enjoy our levity, or is it that you don't think that most of us take anti-idiotarianism seriously? Which is it? Because those are the only two assertions that I made.

/it's that you don't understand or represent the totality of Lizards, so stop acting like you do

986 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:01:36am

re: #983 fiat_lux

I'm just jumping in here because these sound like reasonable questions . The Earth is hunrdeds of millions of years old, I don't know exactly how many years. Most fossisl predate the Noachic flood, or the Gilgamesh flood or whichever flood you choose.

There was no global flood. And the earth is 4.6 BILLION years old. There has been life on it for more than 3 1/2 billion years.

987 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:03:13am

re: #985 Killian Bundy

/it's that you don't understand or represent the totality of Lizards, so stop acting like you do

If you can mine that assertion out of my statement, you must be using a language parser unknown to contemporary linguistics.

But you're saving all your nasty for meee...

988 golly_wog  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:03:34am

re: #983 fiat_lux

I'm just jumping in here because these sound like reasonable questions . The Earth is hunrdeds of millions of years old, I don't know exactly how many years. Most fossisl predate the Noachic flood, or the Gilgamesh flood or whichever flood you choose.

Thanks for your response.

989 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:05:32am

re: #988 golly_wog

Thanks for your response.

Now ask it if it accepts that humans and great apes share common ancestors...

990 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:06:03am

re: #953 Erik The Red

I am going to regret asking. So what are you than?

Still waiting Fiat. Define what you believe in once and for all.

991 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:06:50am

re: #982 Salamantis

You have no idea what you are talking about.

992 golly_wog  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:06:56am

re: #989 Salamantis

Now ask it if it accepts that humans and great apes share common ancestors...

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle, I didn't think of that.

993 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:07:29am

re: #987 Salamantis

If you can mine that assertion out of my statement, you must be using a language parser unknown to contemporary linguistics.

Query:

Although we enjoy our levity here, most of us are serious about anti-idiotarian pusuits

/who are we?

994 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:08:28am

re: #990 Erik The Red Last big ID thread we got into it on he admitted he had no beliefs except that Darwin didn't get it right he had no substantiation for it. He has no belief because that way he doesn't have to take or defend a stance only ask others to defend theirs so he may try to act superior.

995 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:08:44am

re: #986 Salamantis

Thanks, Sal . No more questions are necessary.

996 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:09:24am

re: #992 golly_wog
Shouldn't that be Monkey's nephew :P

997 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:09:53am

re: #988 golly_wog

Your are welcome.

998 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:10:15am

re: #991 fiat_lux

You have no idea what you are talking about.

re: #967 fiat_lux

Sal, you do not know what you are talking about.

Someone bump Fiat's table, and bounce his needle out of that groove it's stuck in...;~)

999 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:10:37am

re: #994 Rancher

Last big ID thread we got into it on he admitted he had no beliefs except that Darwin didn't get it right he had no substantiation for it. He has no belief because that way he doesn't have to take or defend a stance only ask others to defend theirs so he may try to act superior.

In S. Africa we call that kind of remark/stance a pussification.

1000 golly_wog  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:11:43am

re: #996 Rancher

Shouldn't that be Monkey's nephew :P

Actually, it's mainly the inlaws, so I'm uncle-in-law, but I see your point.

1001 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:12:03am

re: #989 Salamantis

Ask it? Ask what?

1002 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:13:57am

re: #993 Killian Bundy

Query:

Although we enjoy our levity here, most of us are serious about anti-idiotarian pusuits

/who are we?

Since you repeated your question of
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
I will repeat my answer of [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

What's your objection? Is it that you don't think lizards enjoy our levity, or is it that you don't think that most of us take anti-idiotarianism seriously? Which is it? Because those are the only two assertions that I made.

Maybe someone should bump Killian's table, too...;~)

1003 golly_wog  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:15:33am

Enjoyed the drive by, gotta go walk the trilobite. Squabble on and fair thee well.

1004 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:16:05am

re: #995 fiat_lux

Thanks, Sal . No more questions are necessary.

Except for mine: Do you accept that humans and great apes share common ancestors, or do you not, and in either case, why?

1005 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:16:58am

Let me consolidate this: You are all concerned about the creationist boogeyman. Rest assured you have not found him. But continue to search. It will make you feel better.

1006 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:17:55am

re: #1001 fiat_lux

Ask it? Ask what?

See post #1004.

1007 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:18:14am

re: #1005 fiat_lux

Let me consolidate this: You are all concerned about the creationist boogeyman. Rest assured you have not found him. But continue to search. It will make you feel better.

Answer honestly the questions and let us decide what the fuck you believe in.

1008 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:18:54am

re: #1005 fiat_lux

Let me consolidate this: You are all concerned about the creationist boogeyman. Rest assured you have not found him. But continue to search. It will make you feel better.

Answer the question I posed in post #1004. Wussing out won't fly.

1009 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:19:05am

re: #1002 Salamantis

Since you repeated your question of
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
I will repeat my answer of [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

What's your objection? Is it that you don't think lizards enjoy our levity, or is it that you don't think that most of us take anti-idiotarianism seriously? Which is it? Because those are the only two assertions that I made.

Maybe someone should bump Killian's table, too...;~)

You don't [expletive deleted] get it.

/LGF doesn't revolve around your worldview

1010 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:22:17am

re: #1009 Killian Bundy

You don't [expletive deleted] get it.

/LGF doesn't revolve around your worldview

What new word is this [expletive deleted]? Never heard that in S. Africa or the US when I am there.

1011 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:23:07am

re: #953 Erik The Red

Eric. I am merely someone who does not accept Darwinian evolution. If that can stop some heartburn among these creatures I will be kind happy.

1012 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:23:36am

re: #1009 Killian Bundy

You don't [expletive deleted] get it.

/LGF doesn't revolve around your worldview

No, it's reflective of Charles'. And I happen to agree with him about having fun here occasionally, and also about being serious here about outing idiotarians, whether they're moonbat socialists, eurofascists, or Disco Institute Wedge Strategy shills. I suppose, except for that last item, you can say the same.

1013 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:24:40am

re: #1011 fiat_lux

Eric. I am merely someone who does not accept Darwinian evolution. If that can stop some heartburn among these creatures I will be kind happy.

Answer the question posed to you in #1004, or else admit you're wimping out on it.

1014 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:24:55am

re: #998 Salamantis

So, if Charles posted your total up dings and down dings along with your "karma" in your profile do you think you'd be proud?

/I suspect your up ding/down ding ratio would be much closer to zero than one

1015 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:25:51am

re: #1011 fiat_lux

Eric. I am merely someone who does not accept Darwinian evolution. If that can stop some heartburn among these creatures I will be kind happy.

So if you don't accept evolution you accept ID/creationism.

1016 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:26:22am

re: #1007 Erik The Red

1017 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:26:34am

Oh...and of course Islamofascists...that kinda goes without saying...

1018 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:28:51am

re: #1015 Erik The Red

That is not logical conclusion. I follow nothing, not creatioinsm, not id or anything else you want to mention.

1019 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:29:04am

re: #1012 Salamantis

I suppose, except for that last item, you can say the same.

/well, that would make you a presumptive idiot

1020 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:31:22am

re: #1014 Killian Bundy

So, if Charles posted your total up dings and down dings along with your "karma" in your profile do you think you'd be proud?

/I suspect your up ding/down ding ratio would be much closer to zero than one

Sure, as long as people could also read which posts were updinged and which ones were downdinged, and by who. It would be a kewl feature to add.

Are you jealous of my karma? Or of my karma-to-post ratio? Because it doesn't mean a thing to me; otherwise I wouldn't be here spending posts on the end of a mostly dead thread. I post what I think, regardless; always have, always will.

1021 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:31:42am

re: #1013 Salamantis

Of course we share common ancestry.

1022 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:34:51am

re: #1018 fiat_lux

That is not logical conclusion. I follow nothing, not creationism, not id or anything else you want to mention.

Do you believe in anything. Is the earth round or flat? Did we land on the moon or was it a movie? Do you believe that 9 11 was an inside job? Sucks to be someone who believes in nothing.

1023 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:34:54am

re: #1019 Killian Bundy

/well, that would make you a presumptive idiot

Do you want me to search your post history and post links to examples of how you pooh-poohed concerns that these creationist infiltrations of the public school system were being continuously attempted, even getting into it with Charles on the issue? Because you know that I can...

Or are you saying that that is not the only issue on my list with which you and Charles have a difference of opinion? Which is it?

1024 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:35:57am

re: #1020 Salamantis

Are you jealous of my karma?

/not at all, you primarily only comment on evolution threads and get 95% of the atheist up dings and your posse

1025 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:36:33am

re: #1018 fiat_lux

That is not logical conclusion. I follow nothing, not creatioinsm, not id or anything else you want to mention.

In other words, you're a nihilist?

1026 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:37:15am

Salamantis, I answered you question. What else do you want to know. And Eric, and the bunny person etc.

1027 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:37:26am

re: #1024 Killian Bundy

/not at all, you primarily only comment on evolution threads and get 95% of the atheist up dings and your posse

We all post on what interests us. It interests you to hassle me.

1028 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:38:39am

re: #1024 Killian Bundy

/not at all, you primarily only comment on evolution threads and get 95% of the atheist up dings and your posse

You don't have to be an atheist to believe in evolution Killian.

1029 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:39:32am

re: #1025 Salamantis Nah it makes him a denialist. He denies that there is anything outside his little bubble.

1030 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:39:59am

re: #1023 Salamantis

Do you want me to search your post history and post links to examples of how you pooh-poohed concerns that these creationist infiltrations of the public school system were being continuously attempted, even getting into it with Charles on the issue? Because you know that I can...

Go for it.

/there's no public school district in this country that teaches creationism as science or will ever be allowed to teach creationism as science in this country and that's just a fact

1031 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:41:24am

re: #1022 Erik The Red

It sucks to not know enough to believe in anything. I believe in many things. Just because I do not believe in Creationism or ID does not mean I believe in nothing.

1032 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:42:08am

I'm an Evolutionary Creationist. I believe life evolved and is evolving but at some point somewhere something was created by who or how I have no answers but if God created everything who created God. Its a whole chicken or egg dilema. Did God create man or did man create god.

1033 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:42:15am

re: #1028 Erik The Red

You don't have to be an atheist to believe in evolution Killian.

Did I say that?

/butt out

1034 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:44:11am

re: #1026 fiat_lux

Salamantis, I answered you question. What else do you want to know. And Eric, and the bunny person etc.

What problems DO you have with evolution? Do you not accept that inheritable traits are coded in genomes? Do you not accept that these genomes have a high but not perfect copying fidelity, and thus produce occasional mutations while mostly passing traits efficiently to descendents? Do you not accept that the environment has an effect upon which members of a population live and which ones die? Do you not accept that this effect is connected with the traits that each member carries, whether they are mutations or not? Or do you not accept that the traits of those members that are selected for and get to live to reproduce end up comprising a greater percentage of the following generation? Because if you accept all of these things, you accept evolutionary theory.

1035 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:44:57am

re: #1029 Rancher

Nah it makes him a denialist. He denies that there is anything outside his little bubble.

Oh, okay...you're talking solipsism...

1036 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:46:14am

re: #1025 Salamantis

You have narrowed it down to that? I will not answer that question. It is beneath my dignity. You on the other hand should do a little more study in philosophy.

1037 Rancher  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:46:29am

re: #1035 Salamantis Actually was just trying to be funny making a play on Nhilism.

1038 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:49:10am

re: #1027 Salamantis

It interests you to hassle me.

In a couple former lives I used to deal up close and personal with thousands of people per day for many years.

/I have a good sense of smell

1039 Erik The Red  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:50:36am

re: #1033 Killian Bundy

Did I say that?

/butt out

Ok this is not a fight I want to get into the middle of Killian. You two go at it.

1040 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:52:35am

re: #1030 Killian Bundy

Go for it.

/there's no public school district in this country that teaches creationism as science or will ever be allowed to teach creationism as science in this country and that's just a fact

And meanwhile, the Disco Institute shills get churches to lobby legislatures to pass laws approving the teaching of creationist materials in public high school science classes. Then their pet printing presses sell them these materials, and the Disco Dewde members get both royalties from the book sales and a percentage of the profits from the presses, which they hold stock in. And when the inevitable court case is filed, they also get paid to testify as 'expert' witnesses. And when the law is inevitably overturned, the school board or district is stuck with unusable creationist 'educational' materials they paid good money for, and the court costs and fines, and the cost of the futile Disco Dewde testimony, and the costs cause th3 school district, and its teachers, and its students, to suffer from the resultant financial squeeze, while the Disco Dewdes laugh all the way to the bank, and plan their next bunco scam of the naive and gullible faithful.

Sounds like a RICO case to me.

1041 fiat_lux  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:52:52am

Okay, Rancher and Salamntis you can continue to high five youselves on what a great job you did defending evolution. Especially you Rancher, you were awesome. But I must retire now, perhaps we can pick this ot the morrow.

1042 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:55:51am

re: #1040 Salamantis

And meanwhile, the Disco Institute shills get churches to lobby legislatures to pass laws approving the teaching of creationist materials in public high school science classes.

/where should we send the fire engines?

1043 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:56:22am

re: #1038 Killian Bundy

In a couple former lives I used to deal up close and personal with thousands of people per day for many years.

/I have a good sense of smell

I contest this assertion, as you obviously cannot detect the wafting fragrance of your own rank and rancid ordure which is permeating thread after thread as a result of your irrational, unreasonable, and gratuitous anti-Sal jihad, for which I have given you no reason to engage.

1044 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:57:20am

re: #1042 Killian Bundy

/where should we send the fire engines?

Like I said; sounds like a RICO case to me.

1045 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 5:59:30am

re: #1036 fiat_lux

You have narrowed it down to that? I will not answer that question. It is beneath my dignity. You on the other hand should do a little more study in philosophy.

Well, my ba is in philosophy, and it was my major track in my humanities interdisciplinary ma, but I guess I could go for my phd...

1046 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:07:27am

re: #1044 Salamantis

Like I said; sounds like a RICO case to me.

Oh really?

/of course you've never actually read the RICO statutes or you wouldn't have embarrassed yourself with that statement

1047 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:23:43am

re: #1046 Killian Bundy

Oh really?

/of course you've never actually read the RICO statutes or you wouldn't have embarrassed yourself with that statement

Well, they were successfully employed against violently coercive anti-abortion protestors in my state. Of course, just because some of the same people support both causes doesn't mean that they can both be prosecuted under the statute, since there doesn't seem to be any violent coercion involved, but I think a case can be made for fraud prosecution. Discovery could be filed against the Discovery Institute to discover if there were any memos around that stated or implied that they knew or suspected in advance that the laws would be overturned in court, but were going ahead with passage anyway for monetary profit reasons. Whether the discovery of such memos would allow a case for fraud to be made is an interesting, and as yet undecided, legal question. They would certainly prove intent to profit at public expense, but does that constitute intent to defraud? It would make for an interesting case.

1048 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:27:06am

re: #1046 Killian Bundy

/yeah, ding me down for stating the truth, you have no idea what RICO is, feel free to ding me down again for pointing that out

1049 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:32:12am

re: #1047 Salamantis

Well, they were successfully employed against violently coercive anti-abortion protestors in my state. Of course, just because some of the same people support both causes doesn't mean that they can both be prosecuted under the statute, since there doesn't seem to be any violent coercion involved, but I think a case can be made for fraud prosecution. Discovery could be filed against the Discovery Institute to discover if there were any memos around that stated or implied that they knew or suspected in advance that the laws would be overturned in court, but were going ahead with passage anyway for monetary profit reasons. Whether the discovery of such memos would allow a case for fraud to be made is an interesting, and as yet undecided, legal question. They would certainly prove intent to profit at public expense, but does that constitute intent to defraud? It would make for an interesting case.

/us lawyers, we cite the statutes we're making our ridiculous argument on, you have absolutely no idea what you're spouting about, quit while you're behind or keep the entertainment coming

1050 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:34:19am

re: #1048 Killian Bundy

/yeah, ding me down for stating the truth, you have no idea what RICO is, feel free to ding me down again for pointing that out

I already knew that RICO stood for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, and I just presented a possible case that might be made under the statute, so obviously I'm not clueless concerning it - especially considering that it was I who brought it up as a possible means of prosecution in a particular matter, which is prima facie evidence of an awareness of the existence and possible employment of the law.

1051 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:35:36am

Damn, this is fun now.

Discovery could be filed against the Discovery Institute

Really?

/how would that work?

1052 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:39:09am

re: #1051 Killian Bundy

Damn, this is fun now.


Really?

/how would that work?

Can you not subpoena the files of an organization against which suit has been filed in order to build your case? Or does self-incrimination protection apply?

1053 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:39:21am

re: #1050 Salamantis

I who brought it up as a possible means of prosecution in a particular matter, which is prima facie evidence of an awareness of the existence and possible employment of the law.

/[expletive deleted] off hoser, frame that, that's the most stupid comment on this thread

1054 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:40:49am

re: #1052 Salamantis

Can you not subpoena the files of an organization against which suit has been filed in order to build your case? Or does self-incrimination protection apply?

/you need to get past filing a suit and getting to discovery

1055 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:41:33am

And there is always the possibility that someone inside the organization might supply the files out of a sense of civic duty...it happened in the California case against that big power conglomerate.

1056 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:45:55am

re: #1052 Salamantis

Can you not subpoena the files of an organization against which suit has been filed in order to build your case? Or does self-incrimination protection apply?

/and just what have the "Disco Dewdes" done that the NEA already hasn't?

1057 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:49:01am

re: #1055 Salamantis

And there is always the possibility that someone inside the organization might supply the files out of a sense of civic duty...it happened in the California case against that big power conglomerate.

Good luck.

/my point is that you just can't demand discovery without suing someone

1058 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:49:12am

re: #1056 Killian Bundy

/and just what have the "Disco Dewdes" done that the NEA already hasn't?

Made a profit out of getting unconstitutional laws passed?

1059 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:51:34am

re: #1057 Killian Bundy

Good luck.

/my point is that you just can't demand discovery without suing someone

But of course you would sue them first.

1060 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:52:22am

re: #1058 Salamantis

Made a profit out of getting unconstitutional laws passed?

/like what?

1061 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:54:28am

re: #1059 Salamantis

But of course you would sue them first.

It depends.

/who are my clients?

1062 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:55:10am

re: #1060 Killian Bundy

/like what?

Like Aguilar. Like Dover.

And one could get to the discovery phase by showing that profits were indeed made at public expense, by showing that members accrued royalties from book sales and from dividends paid by stock in the printing presses, and show where the monies came from to purchase these subsequently unusable materials.

1063 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 6:56:58am

re: #1061 Killian Bundy

It depends.

/who are my clients?

The people who put their faith in the constitutionality of Disco Institute crafted laws, and subsequently lost money because of it? School boards, state legislatures...

1064 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:08:04am

re: #1063 Salamantis

The people who put their faith in the constitutionality of Disco Institute crafted laws, and subsequently lost money because of it? School boards, state legislatures...

Think about taking the LSAT

/kind of like the Harry Potter Sorting Hat

1065 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:10:42am

re: #1064 Killian Bundy

Think about taking the LSAT

/kind of like the Harry Potter Sorting Hat

You'll have to admit that the more we consider it, the more plausible it appears...

1066 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:18:13am

re: #1065 Salamantis

You'll have to admit that the more we consider it, the more plausible it appears...

You practice test, the better LSAT score you get, of course you'll need decent college transcripts. You get in you get in.

/write your ticket if you're good, three years versus a lame PHD?

1067 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:25:00am

re: #1065 Salamantis

You'll have to admit that the more we consider it, the more plausible it appears...

One other thing...I'm thinking that we can agree that an injustice is being perpetrated, for private profit, to these financially raped school boards...and when property taxes have to be raised to make up the diff, or general expense funds have to be diverted to cover shortfalls, to the people. Is caveat emptor a sufficient defence? Just because it is immoral doesn't mean that it can found to be illegal, or that liability can be laid and damages can be assessed. But there does seem to exist that intriguing possibility...

1068 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:26:42am

re: #1066 Killian Bundy

You practice test, the better LSAT score you get, of course you'll need decent college transcripts. You get in you get in.

/write your ticket if you're good, three years versus a lame PHD?

I'll take that invitation as a compliment, whether or not it was intended as such...;~)

1069 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:27:25am

re: #1068 Salamantis

I'll take that invitation as a compliment, whether or not it was intended as such...;~)

/it was

1070 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:35:48am

re: #1069 Killian Bundy

/it was

Howzabout a cum laude gpa, an outstanding student award from my college of arts and sciences, and a 2190 on my gre?

1071 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:41:36am

re: #1070 Salamantis

Howzabout a cum laude gpa, an outstanding student award from my college of arts and sciences, and a blockquote>

/the LSAT is a different animal, it's a timed test and you need to practice

1072 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:46:22am

re: #1070 Salamantis

Howzabout a cum laude gpa, an outstanding student award from my college of arts and sciences, and a 2190 on my gre?

Gee, I had a cum laude GPA in law school, got my license.

/so what's stopping you?

1073 Irish Rose  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:47:42am

Dammit, I missed another good brawl.

1074 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:51:53am

re: #1072 Killian Bundy

Gee, I had a cum laude GPA in law school, got my license.

/so what's stopping you?

I like philosophy. And I'm good at it.

Even though the dough ain't the same...

1075 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:53:15am

re: #1074 Salamantis

I like philosophy. And I'm good at it.

Even though the dough ain't the same...

/like nonexistent

1076 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 7:55:58am

re: #1074 Salamantis

I like philosophy. And I'm good at it.

Even though the dough ain't the same...

Philosophy is a closed field.

/nothing more to be discovered

1077 Salamantis  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 8:02:25am

re: #1076 Killian Bundy

Philosophy is a closed field.

/nothing more to be discovered

I disagree. I know that you've made fun of my essays, but there's stuff in there that you can't find in books. And my profs have agreed with me, even to the point of taking some of my ideas and running with them in their own books. I'd prefer to get some credit, but at least the ideas are getting out there. I don't write unless I have something new to say. And I strive for the new thing to be central and fundamental; when those to criteria are met, there's a good chance that it's important.

1078 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 8:10:06am

re: #1077 Salamantis

I disagree. I know that you've made fun of my essays, but there's stuff in there that you can't find in books. And my profs have agreed with me, even to the point of taking some of my ideas and running with them in their own books. I'd prefer to get some credit, but at least the ideas are getting out there. I don't write unless I have something new to say. And I strive for the new thing to be central and fundamental; when those to criteria are met, there's a good chance that it's important.

/good luck selling it

1079 Aye Pod  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 8:18:20am

The Cocteau Twins have a song for every occasion...

Feet-Like Fins

1080 Killian Bundy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 8:30:35am
1081 Sharmuta  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 9:06:50am

"fiat_lux" is an anagram for faux lit. How apropos.

1082 joan  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 9:06:54am

OT/found a fascinating essay called "Treason of the Intellectuals" written by: Steven Dutch, Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin - Green Bay [Link: www.uwgb.edu...]
[Link: www.uwgb.edu...]

I liked his groundrules, seemed fair and sensible:

"I will respond to questions and comments as time permits, but if you want to take issue with any position expressed here, you first have to answer this question: What evidence would it take to prove your beliefs wrong?

I simply will not reply to challenges that do not address this question. Refutability is one of the classic determinants of whether a theory can be called scientific. Moreover, I have found it to be a great general-purpose cut-through-the-crap question to determine whether somebody is interested in serious intellectual inquiry or just playing mind games. Note, by the way, that I am assuming the burden of proof here - all you have to do is commit to a criterion for testing. It's easy to criticize science for being "closed-minded". Are you open-minded enough to consider whether your ideas might be wrong?

Oh, and this is Off Topic because there is a book I've got to try and read, by Julien Benda, "Treason of the Intellectuals" about the intersection of nationalism and political infatuation with classical "cleric" as in literate classes and philosphers, and the change that came about as a result. (Dr. Dutch's essay appears to offer a nice summary, but must see the book itself). linky
[Link: www.amazon.com...]

note: if there is a book spinoff, anyone, post how to find it and I'll gladly confine this sort of thing to that venue

1083 Aye Pod  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 9:19:02am

re: #967 fiat_lux

Sal, you do not know what you are talking about.

It's glaringly obvious that you are an ID'er who thinks he will be more effective if he covers that fact up. But you haven't covered it up very well.

You use the same 'go fetch links for me' tactics and the same stupid, oft-refuted talking points as any ID'er, while having no positive theory - not even the merest suggestion of an idea of your own - to challenge the hated 'evolutionists' with, again, just like any ID proponent.

At this point, I don't know why you are bothering, unless you are actually trying to discredit the ID crowd. If that is the case, then you're doing a really smashing job - well done.

1084 Aye Pod  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 9:27:44am

re: #457 J.S.

hmmm...I'm not so sure that I agree with that last statement...A while ago (over a year?) someone linked to a conference -- and the conference was about atheism and science...and these were all (imo) fanatics. There was Patricia Churchland (do you know who she is?), insisting that the atheist's "line" MUST get out their message to the public -- do advertisements, etc. There were other "scientists" (?) exclaiming that having done a survey and discovered (o the shock, o the horror) that X number of scientists were not atheists, was just too much and something had to done! They really did sound like crack-pots...(I'll have to search for that link...)...like a mirror of some sort of tribunal conducting an inquisition...and demanding 100 percent adherence to a single point of view, or else...(that's hardly a "scientific" orientation.)

Here's a page that has the videos of the conference featuring the supposed 'fanatics' you referred to. I haven't yet found the bit that you mentioned, but it's pretty clear that a range of opinion among essentially atheist thinkers was represented and debated there. So far, I haven't seen anything that could be described as fanaticism, just well informed and thought provoking discussion.

[Link: thesciencenetwork.org...]

1085 DebbieSym  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 9:51:53am

If one wants to convince the "50% in the middle" that evoluation is a sound scientific theory, then I don't think mentioning Marx is a good way to go about it. It certainly did not endear me to their point of view, although I am not anti-evoluation, far from it.

1086 Charles Johnson  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 10:06:30am

re: #1085 DebbieSym

If one wants to convince the "50% in the middle" that evoluation is a sound scientific theory, then I don't think mentioning Marx is a good way to go about it. It certainly did not endear me to their point of view, although I am not anti-evoluation, far from it.

It wasn't the scientist who mentioned Marx.

1087 Lynn B.  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 12:06:55pm

re: #1086 Charles

It wasn't the scientist who mentioned Marx.

Actually, he was. At about 9:48. "Do you think Marx has this problem?" I think the point he was trying to make was that while Darwin's ideas have been misappropriated by eugenicists and "social Darwinists," Marx's ideas have been quite accurately appropriated by Marxists, socialists and communists. But Jones went off in a different direction, implying that there actually is some huge disconnect between Marx's "useful" way of "analyzing things" and Marxist ideology. Kind of off the wall, if you ask me, and not, I think, where Padian intended that question to lead.

1088 Charles Johnson  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 12:55:07pm

re: #1087 Lynn B.

Actually, he was. At about 9:48. "Do you think Marx has this problem?" I think the point he was trying to make was that while Darwin's ideas have been misappropriated by eugenicists and "social Darwinists," Marx's ideas have been quite accurately appropriated by Marxists, socialists and communists. But Jones went off in a different direction, implying that there actually is some huge disconnect between Marx's "useful" way of "analyzing things" and Marxist ideology. Kind of off the wall, if you ask me, and not, I think, where Padian intended that question to lead.

I stand corrected -- Padian did bring up Marx. But as you say, the point was definitely not to support Marx. The clergyman, on the other hand, very clearly did think Marxism was "useful."

1089 ruffy  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 12:57:49pm

"Interesting" you say?
I actually find him dimwitted.
And the mop on his scholarly head should prove that!
He thinks Creationists are backward-thinking Pilgrims
who do not want to share "enlightenment" from his ilk of wisdom.
After all, he wrote a book on dinasours.
Why can't he just get straight to the point and try to prove the
evolution of species from species?!

1090 Charles Johnson  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 1:06:12pm

Oh brother.

1091 Achilles Tang  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 2:01:10pm

Cool. 1090 comments and not one deleted (although a few could qualify). The word must have gotten out.

;)

1092 iceman  Sun, Dec 7, 2008 4:59:58pm

Fora TV

is a treasure of talking heads and smart people

don't forget to click on full program if you want to see or hear more than excerpts

also under downloads is the audio and video, since most are talking head I download the audio for a smaller file and keep a bunch on the ipod.

search around there is some very interesting stuff.

1093 dogggy  Mon, Dec 8, 2008 12:27:45pm

I have one simple question for the evolutionists if they can answer this question to my satisfaction I will honestly take the evolutionary view. Here it is...Which came first the Chicken or the Egg?

1094 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 8, 2008 1:15:44pm

re: #1093 dogggy

I have one simple question for the evolutionists if they can answer this question to my satisfaction I will honestly take the evolutionary view. Here it is...Which came first the Chicken or the Egg?

The Lizard. They lay eggs, too.

1095 Charles Johnson  Mon, Dec 8, 2008 1:47:28pm

re: #1093 dogggy

I have one simple question for the evolutionists if they can answer this question to my satisfaction I will honestly take the evolutionary view. Here it is...Which came first the Chicken or the Egg?

42.

1096 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 8, 2008 4:41:13pm

Chicken and Egg Question Answered
[Link: www.guardian.co.uk...]

It is a question that has vexed philosophers since the Greeks. But it seems we may now have the answer to the beguilingly simple question: "Which came first?" It's the egg.

This reassuring conclusion was the work of an expert panel including a philosopher, geneticist and chicken farmer.

"Whether chicken eggs preceded chickens hinges on the nature of chicken eggs," said panel member and philosopher of science David Papineau at King's College London.

"I would argue it's a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it. If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg. By this reasoning, the first chicken did indeed come from a chicken egg, even though that egg didn't come from chickens."

The oldest recorded reference to the childish conundrum goes back to a collection of essays and discussions by the Greek historian Mestrius Plutarchus, born in 46AD. In a section entitled Whether the Hen or the Egg Came First he suggested that the question was already well established: "The problem about the egg and the hen, which of them came first, was dragged into our talk, a difficult problem which gives investigators much trouble."

Plutarchus also hinted at the puzzle's greater significance: "Sulla my comrade said that with a small problem, as with a tool, we were rocking loose a great and heavy one, that of the creation of the world."

Whether the panel solved that debate is not clear, but they were unanimous on the correct chicken/egg pecking order. John Brookfield, an evolutionary geneticist at the University of Nottingham said the solution involves piecing together the speciation event in which chickens first evolved.

He imagines two non-chicken parents getting together and giving rise to the first individual of a new species because of a genetic mutation. "The first chicken must have differed from its parents by some genetic change, perhaps a very subtle one, but one which caused this bird to be the first ever to fulfil our criteria for truly being a chicken," said Prof Brookfield.

"Thus the living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken that it would develop into, and thus would itself be a member of the species of chicken," he added.

Will the panel be conducting other chicken-related enquiries, such as why did the chicken cross the road? Prof Brokfield refused to comment.

1097 fiat_lux  Mon, Dec 8, 2008 5:32:06pm

re: #1083 Jimmah

Jimmah, I am not an id'er. If I were I would say so. I'm sure the id movement can find one of their own to represent their views. I represent myself and no one else. And, since I do not belong to any organization, nor even a loosely connected group of individuals, nothing I write should discredit anyone but me. One does not have to submit credentials or affiliations to post on LGF, and it would easy to puff up credentials or pretend to be something other than what you are. I don't do either.

1098 fiat_lux  Mon, Dec 8, 2008 5:46:51pm

re: #982 Salamantis

Salamantis, I aplogize for that remark.

1099 ASU86PE  Mon, Dec 8, 2008 11:49:33pm

re: #1093 dogggy A stronger question is "How did the inanimate reproduce?" Triangulate from their god 'earthmother' and cause them to defend it - the death-spirally energy-dissipating thermodynamic disassociating entity that it is - because it continuously removes life energy and does not replace it.

Then add this challenge, "Man, produce the next series of elements, ergo those elements which would contain the next greater level of protons-neutrons-electrons and the respective weights, for "that" next series in the Table of Elements.

If Man can determine how all the origins in the manufacturing of the first man, let's call him Adam, was made, then Man can make anything; ergo, the next elemental series. Because, where else does this study lead, but to the very jealous nature of Man. Incapable of inventing his own "dirt", Man must use something he did not invent to explain a process he did not conceive. And that which was formed by dust will merely return to dust.

1100 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 9, 2008 1:01:28am

re: #1099 ASU86PE

A stronger question is "How did the inanimate reproduce?" Triangulate from their god 'earthmother' and cause them to defend it - the death-spirally energy-dissipating thermodynamic disassociating entity that it is - because it continuously removes life energy and does not replace it.

More Second Law of Thermodynamics rantings? But the earth's biosphere is not a closed system; it receives energy from the Sun. And open systems are exempt from the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Then add this challenge, "Man, produce the next series of elements, ergo those elements which would contain the next greater level of protons-neutrons-electrons and the respective weights, for "that" next series in the Table of Elements.

The Big Bang was so hot, all the matter in it was in the form of plasma, with no atomic bonds whatsoever, just a frothing cauldron of elementary particles. When things expanded and cooled, these particles coalesced into the most simple element - hydrogen. Mutual gravitation pulled great masses of hydrogen together, and the intense pressure of that gravitational crush generated enough heat to ignite nuclear fusion, which in turn produced higher order elements.

If Man can determine how all the origins in the manufacturing of the first man, let's call him Adam, was made, then Man can make anything; ergo, the next elemental series. Because, where else does this study lead, but to the very jealous nature of Man. Incapable of inventing his own "dirt", Man must use something he did not invent to explain a process he did not conceive. And that which was formed by dust will merely return to dust.

We don't have to be able to reproduce a supernova, or a black hole, in order to explain what one is and how it operates. And it was humans who figured out the empirical and logical principles of scientific investigation and experiment, and humans who applied them to the evidence they themselves collected and collated, and who deduced the operative processes underlying the changes in terrestrial life over the span of geological time. And the first human was not 'manufactured' directly out of dirt; that first human was the result of the incremental aggregation of millions upon millions of environmentally selected mutations over a period exceeding three billion years.

1101 ASU86PE  Tue, Dec 9, 2008 6:38:50am

re: #1100 Salamantis

"it receives energy from the Sun." That too will end or do you know of some magic that I do not possess?

"was so hot," No argument here; the Bible is replete about the power of God!

"it was humans who figured out... " Nice you swerved into Genesis 1:28, "And God blessed them, and said ... replenish the earth, and subdue it: "


The facts of this matter is this argument is a Judeo-Christian argument. The very logic you use came from very Judeo-Christian centers of thought. Secular logic does not exist. But if Man contiues to try to invent God-less creation, it can only lead to life-less creation which is death.

And I get that you're still hung up on the "time" thing. That's a topic for another day, but a clue is that, " so hot" comment.

Hi-ho, hi-ho, it off to work I go.

1102 ASU86PE  Tue, Dec 9, 2008 6:39:54am

Hi-ho, hi-ho, it('s) off to work I go.

1103 Charles Johnson  Tue, Dec 9, 2008 11:27:33am

re: #1101 ASU86PE

Secular logic does not exist.

That's one of the flat-out dumbest comments ever posted in a creationism thread.

1104 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 9, 2008 1:44:30pm

re: #1101 ASU86PE

"it receives energy from the Sun." That too will end or do you know of some magic that I do not possess?

Yeah, but it's happening how, and for a long long time yet, and has been happening for as long as the earth has been around. No closed system. No second law of thermodynamics violation.

"was so hot," No argument here; the Bible is replete about the power of God!

Whatever.I won't argue with you about a God of Initially High Temperatures.

"it was humans who figured out... " Nice you swerved into Genesis 1:28, "And God blessed them, and said ... replenish the earth, and subdue it: "

Genesis also says that God created the universe, the earth, and all of the tens of millions of terrestrial species, both existent and extinct, separately, independently, and as is, in the span of six days a few thousand years ago. And this assertion is demostrably false in several essential particulars, such as the age of the universe, the age of the earth, the age of terrestrial life, and the few ancient common ancestors from which all the different species of life evolutionarily diverged.

The facts of this matter is this argument is a Judeo-Christian argument. The very logic you use came from very Judeo-Christian centers of thought. Secular logic does not exist. But if Man contiues to try to invent God-less creation, it can only lead to life-less creation which is death.

You are absolutely wronmg about this. Apparently, you know nothing of Aristotelian logic. It was invented by the Greeks before they were conquered by the Romans. Judeo-Christians had nothing to do with it.
Read all about it:

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

And what human scientists are doing is not inventing, but investigating, experimenting, and discovering. Discovering what? New empirical knowledge, on which can be based new theoretical understanding. It is technologists who later take this new knowledge and understanding and employ it in order to invent new things.

And I get that you're still hung up on the "time" thing. That's a topic for another day, but a clue is that, " so hot" comment.

Yeah, right, shuuure...like time and temperature are somehow interchangeable categories. And btw, it's spacetime. Einstein conclusively demonstrated that there's no such things as pure 'space' or 'time' separate from each other. Neither an instantaneous nor an infinitesimal cube could exist. Spatiotemporality is a single four-dimensional manifold.

Hi-ho, hi-ho, it off to work I go.

I figured you had to make a living swinging a pick and shovel.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

You can't explain that.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

Channeling Confucius
From the previous Diamond Jubilee
42 seconds ago
Views: 1 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Gus
GOP Groups Plan $1 Billion Blitz
32 minutes ago
Views: 36 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Kragar
Romney wants Constitutional Amendment requiring the President to have business experience
39 minutes ago
Views: 50 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

Daniel Ballard
Egyptian Student Invents New Propulsion Method - Science - Health & Science - OnIslam.net
53 minutes ago
Views: 38 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Bob Dillon
Diseases Grow at Psychiatry Meeting-Thanks to Big Pharma
1 hour, 1 minute ago
Views: 35 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Learned Mother of Zion
Native Americans Have Jewish DNA!
1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Views: 108 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 2

Eclectic Infidel
Mitt Romney for a better Amercia!
1 hour, 29 minutes ago
Views: 70 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Aigle
Ha'aretz, Lost in Translation
4 hours, 44 minutes ago
Views: 121 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Randall Gross
Government Employment Drops Under Obama, but Media Run With Romney Myth Anyway
6 hours, 34 minutes ago
Views: 173 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 6 • Rating: 2

researchok
French Philosopher Alain Badiou on the Real Expression of Love: 'If You Limit Yourself to Sexual Pleasure It's Narcissistic'
10 hours, 38 minutes ago
Views: 107 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

 Frank says:

If it sounds GOOD to YOU, it's bitchen; and if it sounds BAD to YOU, it's shitty.