NYC Cop Pleads Not Guilty to Cyclist Assault

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
US News • Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 9:34 am PST • Views: 378

We are assuredly not fans of the Critical Mass bicycle protest yahoos. They’re rude, obnoxious, and give street cycling a bad name. So don’t construe this as support for them.

But as the New York City policeman in this case pleads not guilty to charges of assault and falsification of records, here’s the video that will probably sink him.

Advertisement

852 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 noshariaincanada  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:35:54am

He's sunk.

2 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:36:32am

I don't care. Those cyclists are obnoxious and hostile. Pounding them is a public service.

3 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:37:02am

Damn!

4 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:37:04am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

I don't care. Those cyclists are obnoxious and hostile. Pounding them is a public service.

You really don't mean that, do you?

5 Eowyn2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:37:47am

ah well, can't pull up the vid.

6 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:37:51am

Yeah, looks like an avoidable situation. The cop probably felt like he was not being given the right of way. But he was still out of line.

7 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:37:54am

Heavens to Murgatroyd! I can understand the cop's frustration but, this was without provocation. He just walked over and shoved that man. Shame on him. Shame.

8 turn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:37:56am

It's going to be really hard to talk his way out of this, knocked the guy on his ass plain as day.

9 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:38:23am

re: #6 rawmuse

Yeah, looks like an avoidable situation. The cop probably felt like he was not being given the right of way. But he was still out of line.

The cyclist was swerving to avoid him.

10 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:38:31am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

I don't care. Those cyclists are obnoxious and hostile. Pounding them is a public service.

That is true. But if they can get away with doing it to that idiot they can get away with doing it to you.

11 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:38:34am
12 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:38:45am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

He didn't do anything! That cop's a thug and NYC will be better off without him.

13 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:39:03am

You can see the cop zero in on the approaching rider, then position himself and shove him right onto the sidewalk. He could easily have killed that guy.

14 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:39:05am

Charles I hope you are wrong on this one. The LEO was obviously looking from this man. He had a target and took him out. Many cyclist past him and he didn't even give them more than a glance.

15 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:39:12am

As much as I dislike the Critical Massholes, the officer on the tape had no business pushing the bicyclist like that. The bicyclist made a move to go around the officer, and the officer moved deliberately to push him.

16 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:39:13am

re: #9 MandyManners

The cyclist was swerving to avoid him.

In the slo-mo the cyclist clearly leans in to the cop.

17 Ford_Prefect  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:39:59am

Is there any indication that this particular cyclist was doing something that might warrant the officer stopping him? If not, he better start looking for other employment, and a good lawyer.

18 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:40:08am

re: #6 rawmuse

Yeah, looks like an avoidable situation. The cop probably felt like he was not being given the right of way. But he was still out of line.

Wait, wait, wait, the cop was not being given the right of way? The two cops were standing in the middle of the street, it was evident that the cop eye-balled that rider before he got there and started to walk in such a way that he would connect with the rider as the rider passed.

That was premeditated. One hundred percent.

19 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:40:13am

re: #4 Walter L. Newton

You really don't mean that, do you?

No, I don't. I've just had to scurry out of the way of bikers like that enough times, that part of me enjoyed that video. That hit should not have happened, and if I were on his jury, I'd vote to convict the cop. But I understand why he might have done that.

20 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:40:23am
21 iChef  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:40:42am

It seems for some reason the policeman waited and singled this guy out, as you can see the second office was watching the same biker also. I'm wondering if the biker was yelling threats or doing something we don't see or hear in the video ... Just on face value it does look bad, but what we don't know is why the policeman did what he did or we don't know his side of the story.

22 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:41:06am

He's sunk.

Completely out of line.

*LE Trained*

I would have stuck my baton in the front wheel...
More air time.

///

23 Kragar  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:41:33am

I was thinking this might have been like the code pinker who kept taunting and disobeying the cop, then they play the snippet of her getting shoved. I was wrong. That cop goes out of his way to hit a random biker. He's toast.

24 MrSilverDragon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:41:46am

That was just a dumb move by the policeman, in my opinion. I didn't see any provocation on the cyclist's part to justify being knocked off a bicycle like that. Granted, I only saw what was on the video, not the ride leading up to where the policemen were standing.

On the same token, it really wasn't bright for that cyclist to not be wearing a helmet. That's pretty stupid too.

25 gregg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:41:59am

OT: I thought this might be of interest.

Code Pink activists march in solidarity with shoe-throwing Iraqi journalist

BERKELEY (BCN) Anti-war activists from the group Code Pink will hold a march at a Marine recruiting station in Berkeley this morning to show solidarity with an Iraqi journalist who threw his shoes at President Bush on Sunday.

Members of the group and others will march around the recruiting station holding shoes in the air to show support for Iraqi journalist Muntadhar al-Zeidi, who hurled two shoes at Bush during a news conference in Baghdad.

26 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:42:03am

re: #16 rawmuse

In the slo-mo the cyclist clearly leans in to the cop.

He's leaning to make a turn, as one does on a bicycle. The officer clearly puts his arms under the bicyclist to lift and push him.

27 Steve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:42:03am

If the cop is guilty he should be prosecuted but...we have no idea what the bicyclist was doing before he entered the video. The cop must have seen something.

28 Ford_Prefect  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:42:22am

re: #18 Walter L. Newton

Wait, wait, wait, the cop was not being given the right of way? The two cops were standing in the middle of the street, it was evident that the cop eye-balled that rider before he got there and started to walk in such a way that he would connect with the rider as the rider passed.

That was premeditated. One hundred percent.

Yes, but why? Did the cyclist do something we didn't see?

29 Kosh's Shadow  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:42:35am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

No, they should be arrested, and get sued for all traffic delays they cause.
They can work it off by pedaling generators if they can't afford it.

30 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:42:41am

re: #21 iChef

It seems for some reason the policeman waited and singled this guy out, as you can see the second office was watching the same biker also. I'm wondering if the biker was yelling threats or doing something we don't see or hear in the video ... Just on face value it does look bad, but what we don't know is why the policeman did what he did or we don't know his side of the story.

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

31 lefty201  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:42:56am

not to show my ignorance, but who are these critical mass people. what do they represent?

32 Eowyn2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:43:27am

I cant see the video but as my daddy always said: Never believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.

case in point.

while out with my sister one night we walked into the parking lot pushing and shoving each other and trash talking to each other and some young girls really thought we were going to come to blows, they went inside and told the mgr that two women were ready to fight in the parking lot.

I wish I could see the vid. It is possible that the cop had tangled with the cyclist a couple of times prior to the altercation.

I hate pre-conviction Guilt by Video .

33 JohnnyReb  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:43:31am

That cop is toast. He will be lucky to walk out of this without doing some time.

34 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:43:39am

re: #29 Kosh's Shadow

No, they should be arrested, and get sued for all traffic delays they cause.
They can work it off by pedaling generators if they can't afford it.

Agreed.

35 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:43:43am

re: #27 Steve

If the cop is guilty he should be prosecuted but...we have no idea what the bicyclist was doing before he entered the video. The cop must have seen something.

I'm going to post the same answer to anyone who thinks that this was justified...

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

36 vxbush  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:43:46am

I'm sorry, but who are these cyclists? I know nothing about this.

37 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:43:51am

re: #28 Ford_Prefect

Yes, but why? Did the cyclist do something we didn't see?

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

38 The Other Les  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:43:54am

Is anyone else having a problem with Firefox crashing?

39 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:44:09am

re: #32 Eowyn2

I cant see the video but as my daddy always said: Never believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.

case in point.

while out with my sister one night we walked into the parking lot pushing and shoving each other and trash talking to each other and some young girls really thought we were going to come to blows, they went inside and told the mgr that two women were ready to fight in the parking lot.

I wish I could see the vid. It is possible that the cop had tangled with the cyclist a couple of times prior to the altercation.

I hate pre-conviction Guilt by Video .

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

40 Ford_Prefect  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:44:49am

re: #30 Walter L. Newton

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

I am not defending this officer, but we don't know the whole story just from this video. I will agree that even if he was justified in stopping this cyclist he could have done it less violently.

41 Kragar  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:44:59am

re: #31 lefty201

not to show my ignorance, but who are these critical mass people. what do they represent?

Assholes on bikes who think they own the road.

42 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:45:02am

re: #31 lefty201

not to show my ignorance, but who are these critical mass people. what do they represent?

Critical Mass
They take over roads and cause gridlock making the "point" cars are evil.

43 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:45:12am

Well, I can't get the vid, so I'll just talk about Adriana Lima or guns or something.

44 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:45:31am

Oof!

45 Killgore Trout  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:45:59am

re: #36 vxbush

I'm sorry, but who are these cyclists? I know nothing about this.

I think it was a Critical Mass protest.

46 vxbush  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:46:06am

re: #42 jcm

Critical Mass
They take over roads and cause gridlock making the "point" cars are evil.

Surely we can find a quote from someone in history who said bicycles were evil? There's got to be at least one.

47 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:46:08am

re: #43 Occasional Reader

Well, I can't get the vid, so I'll just talk about Adriana Lima or guns or something.

She was here last night.

48 Eowyn2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:46:16am

re: #23 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

I was thinking this might have been like the code pinker who kept taunting and disobeying the cop, then they play the snippet of her getting shoved. I was wrong. That cop goes out of his way to hit a random biker. He's toast.

unless the random biker had a previous infraction up the line somewhere.

49 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:46:36am

re: #16 rawmuse

In the slo-mo the cyclist clearly leans in to the cop.

I saw the slo-mo bit. The cyclist's movements prior to contact were overall swerving away.

50 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:46:37am

re: #31 lefty201

not to show my ignorance, but who are these critical mass people. what do they represent?

They're douchebags.

Slightly more fulsome explanation; they're people who believe themselves morally superior to lesser beings due to their status as cyclists (or, at least, cyclists at that given moment). To show how superior they are, they deliberately shut down public roadways.

51 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:46:47am

Punk on a power trip with his new badge.

Won't change my opinion of the NYPD, though.

52 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:46:49am

re: #46 vxbush

Surely we can find a quote from someone in history who said bicycles were evil? There's got to be at least one.

[Link: www.evilcycling.com...]

53 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:05am

Here is a little piece of advice, for what it is worth.
If you are in control of a moving vehicle and a cop (or any pedestrian, for that matter, but ESPECIALLY a cop) moves in front of you, headed for the sidewalk,

SLOW DOWN or better yet STOP.

The cyclist did NOT do that. That does not give the cop a pass, but the entire situation was avoidable by the application of a little ORDINARY COURTESY.

54 experiencedtraveller  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:14am

cop was trying to get off the street and threw out his arm a when the Colission was unavoidable.

not guilty.

55 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:15am

re: #47 Walter L. Newton

She was here last night.

"Here" meaning... your home? Well, good for you!

56 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:21am

re: #14 Erik The Red

Charles I hope you are wrong on this one. The LEO was obviously looking from this man. He had a target and took him out. Many cyclist past him and he didn't even give them more than a glance.

Why this one?

57 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:25am

re: #42 jcm

Critical Mass
They take over roads and cause gridlock making the "point" cars are evil.

Yep, they're evil but they don't deserve what that rider got. I regret my #2 comment. It'll probably come in at -20 for karma and I can't really fault the down-dings. I'm sorry.

58 Ford_Prefect  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:36am

re: #37 Walter L. Newton

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

I am sorry, Walter, but you are wrong. It isn't the same thing at all. As I said, If he was justified in stopping the cyclist he could have done it differently, but to say it is the same as beating a wife is just wrong.

59 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:42am

Another video taken from a different angle doesn't show the hit, but shows police stopping another cyclist, then the cop running toward the guy right after hitting him.

60 Killgore Trout  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:47:43am

For those who can't see the video: Critical Mass Bicyclist Assaulted by NYPD

61 Steve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:08am

re: #35 Walter L. Newton

I'm going to post the same answer to anyone who thinks that this was justified...

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

Yes, it does matter. They guy may have tried to kick somebody as he rode by or etc. etc. And equating this incident with wife beating is totally out of line

You are going after the cop based on incomplete facts. Get a life and take your Valium.

62 unrealizedviewpoint  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:15am

re: #21 iChef

It seems for some reason the policeman waited and singled this guy out, as you can see the second office was watching the same biker also. I'm wondering if the biker was yelling threats or doing something we don't see or hear in the video ... Just on face value it does look bad, but what we don't know is why the policeman did what he did or we don't know his side of the story.

Regardless.. It was unnecessary to utilize such force to stop & apprehend. I think that's where they get the term "unnecessary force." :)

63 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:16am

re: #50 Occasional Reader

How people pick these "causes" among all the issues in the world is a mystery to me.

64 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:20am
65 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:23am

Rodney King Part Deux.

No matter what led up to the incident seen in the video, the court of public opinion will fry the officer. And with the level of hatred against LE in liberal cities like NYC or LA I would not doubt that there will be violence if the officer gets a slap on the wrist or is found not guilty.

66 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:26am

GD bless airbrushing.

Carmen Electra looking smoking hot in Playboy.

67 The Other Les  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:27am
68 Eowyn2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:29am

re: #30 Walter L. Newton

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.


I can give a few reasons:

Cyclist wanted for x, y, z crimes
Cyclist kicked little old lady out of the way further up the line
Moving vehicle, cyclist not going to stop, cop must stop cyclist.

69 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:37am

re: #54 experiencedtraveller

when the Colission was unavoidable

Hey, none of those fancy French terms here, please.

70 JacksonTn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:43am

I wish we could see what happened prior to this ...there is always more to the story ...for all we know the guy on the bike could have slapped someone down the road before the video (just using that as an example) ...I want the cop to get the same benefit of the doubt everyone else is suppose to get until all the evidence comes out ...

71 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:48:45am

re: #21 iChef

It seems for some reason the policeman waited and singled this guy out, as you can see the second office was watching the same biker also. I'm wondering if the biker was yelling threats or doing something we don't see or hear in the video ... Just on face value it does look bad, but what we don't know is why the policeman did what he did or we don't know his side of the story.

I don't care if the cyclist was shouting slurs against the cops' mothers. That's no excuse to shove him.

72 Desert Dog  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:49:22am

re: #53 rawmuse

It looks like the cops just got pissed and pushed the biker down. The cop walked over to that spot and knocked him down...

73 Kragar  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:49:28am

re: #48 Eowyn2

unless the random biker had a previous infraction up the line somewhere.

Wouldn't matter. The officer made no attempt to halt or detain the biker, didn't sound like any sort of warning or order to halt was made. He just cross checked the guy.

74 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:49:37am

re: #64 buzzsawmonkey

The cop clearly did wrong.

That said, New York cyclists routinely

1) Ride the wrong way, against traffic;

2) Ignore bike lanes;

3) Ignore traffic signs and traffic lights, and run lights with impunity;

4) Cut in front of other vehicles without warning;

5) Ride without lights or reflectors at night;

6) Wear dark clothing at night while riding without lights or reflectors;

7) Run down pedestrians, often when riding against traffic.

And they get called on NONE of this. No tickets. No arrests. No confiscations. Instead, the city gives them bike lanes which they don't use and--frankly--don't need, increasing the overall traffic congestion. And, unlike the motorists whose space they impinge on with the bike lanes, the cyclists pay absolutely no taxes or fees towards road maintenance.

8) Deliver your food.

75 Creeping Eruption  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:03am

re: #66 Ben Hur

GD bless airbrushing.

Carmen Electra looking smoking hot in Playboy.

Link?

76 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:06am

Did they not have the right to their protest, obnoxious as they are?

Then by what right was this cop assaulting this cyclist? If there was some provocation, surely this was still excessive force on the part of the officer.

77 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:16am

re: #53 rawmuse

Here is a little piece of advice, for what it is worth.
If you are in control of a moving vehicle and a cop (or any pedestrian, for that matter, but ESPECIALLY a cop) moves in front of you, headed for the sidewalk,

SLOW DOWN or better yet STOP.

The cyclist did NOT do that. That does not give the cop a pass, but the entire situation was avoidable by the application of a little ORDINARY COURTESY.

Critical Mass protests, so ordinary courtesy is not allowed or required. They do this for just such a reaction from LE or civilian drivers.

78 Kragar  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:32am

re: #53 rawmuse

The cyclist did NOT do that. That does not give the cop a pass, but the entire situation was avoidable by the application of a little ORDINARY COURTESY.

If the biker had any ordinary courtesy, he wouldn't be part of Critical Mass.

79 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:33am

I have started to see memorials to killed bicyclists put up around the NYC.

Bikes painted white and chained to a sign, with the victim's name, etc.

80 LGoPs  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:34am

re: #46 vxbush

Surely we can find a quote from someone in history who said bicycles were evil? There's got to be at least one.

Maybe the inventor of the unicycle? Cursing as he said 'why the hell didn't I think of that?'

81 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:35am

re: #54 experiencedtraveller

cop was trying to get off the street and threw out his arm a when the Colission was unavoidable.

not guilty.

He shoved that cyclist with BOTH hands.

82 lefty201  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:50:40am

ok, while I agree that sharing the road with cyclists is a really good thing. I think they need to respect the laws as much as any other vehical on the road. If they become assholes about it, and start displaying road rage, they should get the same penalties as any other driver.

with that being said...

This officer was out of line. there were a lot of other ways he could have approached this. He could have called for someone in a car to follow said rider and pull him over if the rider did something beyond the camera lens. The police officer could easily have broken the guys neck when he came down.

83 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:51:08am

re: #68 Eowyn2

I can give a few reasons:

Cyclist wanted for x, y, z crimes
Cyclist kicked little old lady out of the way further up the line
Moving vehicle, cyclist not going to stop, cop must stop cyclist.

Did anyone read the charges? He is also charged with falsifying records on this case. That's interesting.

84 Creeping Eruption  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:51:19am

Well Lizards, it has been fun. Time to put on a suit and tie and take some clients out to the boss' club for lunch.

85 bulwrk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:51:34am

I am not familiar with the story,was the cop radioed by another officer to stop the guy for something that took place down the street off camera?

86 lifeofthemind  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:51:39am

They should run a set of street cleaning machines in front of the critical jerks. Get that street nice and soapy shiny clean. And if one ambulance or fire truck is delayed by these selfish thugs then I say round them up and charge them with reckless endangerment or negligent manslaughter.

87 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:51:46am

re: #75 Creeping Eruption

Link?

Don't know if that would be appropriate?

Some might not appreciate the temptation.
.
.

.
.
..
.

Ah, screw it.

[Link: ns4w.org...]

NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

88 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:51:48am

re: #64 buzzsawmonkey

Also, many ride track bikes with no brakes, in crowded city streets, to prove how cool they are.

Feh.

89 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:00am

Use of Force Continuum. Used by all US LE.

# Verbal command
# Handcuff suspect
# Use wrist/arm lock
# Use takedown
# Block/punch/kick
# Strike suspect
# Wrestle suspect
# Pepper spray
# Use baton
# Use firearm

Note: An officer may skip steps depending on the threat. I.E. draw firearm if presented with a suspect with a lethal weapon. However all officers are still trained to use the voice command, "DROP THE KNIFE" (or Gun).

In this case officer is standing in the street. Video has audio, no commands where given. It was not an attempt at a controlled take down, bringing a suspect to the ground to be controlled and cuffed. Critical Masshole is going around the officer. Officer takes steps and knocks the cyclist down.

Officer is off the reservation. (based on video).

90 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:01am

I don't give a tinker's damn about the cyclist, what I care about is police abusing their authority.

91 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:28am

re: #80 LGoPs

Maybe the inventor of the unicycle? Cursing as he said 'why the hell didn't I think of that?'


I guy rode by me on the Upper East Side of Manhattan last week on one of those.

Totally normal looking guy, probably on his way back from work.

92 noraono  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:29am

I can't see the video because I'm at work.

But, thanks charles for mentioning what a bane to society these critical mass riders are. I've nearly gotten in wrecks because of their "protests" and now I try to make their life as miserable as possible- following at a safe distance while honking for example.

You don't need to hurt them to give them a taste of their own irritating medicine!

That said my dad is an avid bike rider and he's almost been hit many times by inconsiderate cars. Now these idiots have made people even less considerate, ugh.

93 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:30am

re: #83 Walter L. Newton

Did anyone read the charges? He is also charged with falsifying records on this case. That's interesting.

A cop trying to cover his ass, probably. Ain't gonna work in the court of public opinion no matter how it plays out in a civil courtroom.

94 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:39am
95 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:44am

re: #46 vxbush

Surely we can find a quote from someone in history who said bicycles were evil? There's got to be at least one.

About the only thing I remember seeing was about the propriety of women riding bicycles.
;-)

96 experiencedtraveller  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:52:54am

re: #69 Occasional Reader

Hey, none of those fancy French terms here, please.

iPhone reeking havoc on my painfully ignorant commentery. :)

97 unrealizedviewpoint  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:11am

re: #64 buzzsawmonkey

The cop clearly did wrong.

That said, New York cyclists routinely

1) Ride the wrong way, against traffic;

2) Ignore bike lanes;

3) Ignore traffic signs and traffic lights, and run lights with impunity;

4) Cut in front of other vehicles without warning;

5) Ride without lights or reflectors at night;

6) Wear dark clothing at night while riding without lights or reflectors;

7) Run down pedestrians, often when riding against traffic.

And they get called on NONE of this. No tickets. No arrests. No confiscations. Instead, the city gives them bike lanes which they don't use and--frankly--don't need, increasing the overall traffic congestion. And, unlike the motorists whose space they impinge on with the bike lanes, the cyclists pay absolutely no taxes or fees towards road maintenance.

Riding on the sidewalk should be a felony. Or at a minimum a flogging offense. I can't tell you how many times I've been nearly killed. They're on the sidewalk because they are inexperienced or in fear of getting hit by a car, making them a greater threat to pedestrians.

98 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:13am
99 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:39am

re: #81 MandyManners

He shoved that cyclist with BOTH hands.

And lunged at him... hard to "avoid a collision" when you do that?

Yeah, looks to me like the cop is in the wrong, much as I despise the Critical Massholes.

100 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:42am

re: #85 bulwrk

I am not familiar with the story,was the cop radioed by another officer to stop the guy for something that took place down the street off camera?

That will only matter in a civil courtroom. In the court of public opinion the officer has already been tried and found guilty.

101 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:42am

re: #78 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

If the biker had any ordinary courtesy, he wouldn't be part of Critical Mass.

Thank you, I stand corrected. The entire premise of Critical Mass is the antithesis of courtesy.

102 Eowyn2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:51am

from a different point of view.

If the cyclist had stayed on his original course, he would have passed behind the policeman instead of in front of the policeman.

103 Creeping Eruption  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:53am

re: #87 Ben Hur

Don't know if that would be appropriate?

Some might not appreciate the temptation.
.
.

.
.
..
.

Ah, screw it.

[Link: ns4w.org...]

NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

I know what I want for Chankukah

104 vxbush  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:53:55am

This must be a New York issue, because I rarely see bikers doing this in the midwest. The most I see there are people riding their bikes on the wrong side of the street. Maybe every once in a while a biker goes through a light where there is no traffic.

105 Kragar  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:54:15am

re: #94 buzzsawmonkey

The delivery folks on bicycles are among the worst offenders as far as no-lights, no-reflectors, and riding against traffic/running lights/ignoring signs are concerned.

They can deliver food and still abide by the traffic laws.

If people want to ride bikes, fine; if the city wants to encourage them to do so, fine. But let them be treated as the vehicles they are.

A serious three-month crackdown on cyclist scofflaws would vastly improve the quality of life in New York.

Quick, call the Governor, they can throw a tax on bikes too.

106 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:54:16am

re: #85 bulwrk

I am not familiar with the story,was the cop radioed by another officer to stop the guy for something that took place down the street off camera?

What in heaven's name, short of killing someone off camera, could he have done that would give the cop a right to slam him off the bike in such a way that could have instantly killed him.

Good God, he was moving at good clip and went pounding into the cement pavement, he didn't even land on the bit softer asphalt.

107 Mich-again  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:54:22am

Thats about what happened to Lance Armstrong in stage 15 in 2003 when some dipshit in the crowd threw their purse straps over his handlebar as he rode by and made him wipe out in spectacular fashion.

Seen the clip 100 times and it was no accident. They used their purse straps like a lasso to pull the bike down.

That said, the cop in that video is toast. He obviously meant to shove the guy over.

108 Russkilitlover  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:54:27am

re: #65 FurryOldGuyJeans

Rodney King Part Deux.

No matter what led up to the incident seen in the video, the court of public opinion will fry the officer. And with the level of hatred against LE in liberal cities like NYC or LA I would not doubt that there will be violence if the officer gets a slap on the wrist or is found not guilty.

I don't know. I know a couple of New Yorkers who secretly fantasize about mowing these cyclists down with their cars - that is if they can get their cars to move faster than 5 mph. They complain about cyclists all the time. And they are total Leftist Greenies - they even applaud ALF. But they hold an especial anger for these cyclists.

109 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:54:44am

re: #94 buzzsawmonkey


You want cold eggroll?!?!?!?

But seriously, some restaurants have improved their delivery dudes safetly, with reflective vests, etc.

The riding on the sidewalk bit annoys the hell out of me and my dog.

110 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:54:47am

re: #42 jcm

Critical Mass
They take over roads and cause gridlock making the "point" cars are evil.

Exactly right. These people are not pro-bicycle. They are anti-car. On that website, one of the headings for their link categories says "Other Anti-Car sites."

111 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:03am

re: #104 vxbush

This must be a New York issue, because I rarely see bikers doing this in the midwest. The most I see there are people riding their bikes on the wrong side of the street. Maybe every once in a while a biker goes through a light where there is no traffic.

It is a big city phenomenon, usually the cities on the coast like NYC, Seattle or LA.

112 lifeofthemind  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:15am

Notice the Black Flags they are waving? The merchants should have chosen that time to toss out the slops.

113 capitalist piglet  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:30am

He seems to be gunning for that one person. Why? Did he just pick that particular moment to lose control of himself, or was there something happening?

The video sure looks bad, but there is often more to the story. It's just hard to imagine what the cyclist may have done to justify being shoved like that.

114 Eowyn2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:30am

re: #83 Walter L. Newton

Did anyone read the charges? He is also charged with falsifying records on this case. That's interesting.

but that is not in the video.

115 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:32am

re: #93 FurryOldGuyJeans

A cop trying to cover his ass, probably. Ain't gonna work in the court of public opinion no matter how it plays out in a civil courtroom.

Oh, I see, he was trying to cover his ass for being RIGHT.

116 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:34am
117 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:34am

re: #96 experiencedtraveller

iPhone reeking havoc on my painfully ignorant commentery. :)

Well, that'll teach you to buy a French iPhone, won't it?

118 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:55:50am

re: #83 Walter L. Newton

Did anyone read the charges? He is also charged with falsifying records on this case. That's interesting.

I wonder which record was supposedly falsified.

119 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:56:19am

re: #118 MandyManners

I wonder which record was supposedly falsified.


BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

120 Ayatollah Ghilmeini  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:56:31am

My favorite t-shirt of the convention:

Denver Police
We wake up early to beat the crowds

In this case, the officer has to be able to show some sort of provocation or he is in the deepest of poohs.

121 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:56:34am

I just about killed a bunch of Critical Massholes one night.

They blew a red light just as I was entering on the green. Fortunately, and I don't now how I didn't hit any of them. They surrounded my truck and pounded on it. Eventually they moved on.

Good thing I'm a pretty calm and guy, and reasonable.

I only had 31 rounds and there was about 80 of them.
///on the last line.

122 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:56:39am

I suppose that a "cash settlement" will be forthcoming? I wonder what this one's gonna cost.

123 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:56:49am

re: #111 FurryOldGuyJeans

And San Francisco. My car was vandalized by these assholes, with me in it, drivine, and I was armed.

I let them live.

124 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:56:56am

re: #118 MandyManners

I wonder which record was supposedly falsified.

Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau said Pogan was charged with falsifying business records and filing a false instrument. Both are felonies punishable by sixteen months to four years in prison.

125 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:57:02am

re: #112 lifeofthemind

Notice the Black Flags they are waving? The merchants should have chosen that time to toss out the slops.

Pirates of the Road, then. Where's loflyer? We could use his pirate act here.

126 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:57:20am

re: #114 Eowyn2

but that is not in the video.

It's in the article that Charles linked to...

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

Geeessshhh.

127 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:57:48am

Of course those bikes were all localling made by hand and delivered to the retail shops on bikes.

128 FrogMarch  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:57:53am

What the hell was that cop thinking?

129 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:58:10am

re: #99 Occasional Reader

And lunged at him... hard to "avoid a collision" when you do that?

Yeah, looks to me like the cop is in the wrong, much as I despise the Critical Massholes.

I'm glad I don't have to put up with those jerks here. Traffic's bad enough with those entitled assholes in their monster trucks and Hummers.

130 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:58:15am
He also faces misdemeanor charges of third-degree assault, second-degree harassment and making a punishable false written statement.

Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him.

This cop's a prick. He's the sort of guy that gives decent cops a bad name.

131 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:58:23am

re: #113 capitalist piglet

He seems to be gunning for that one person. Why? Did he just pick that particular moment to lose control of himself, or was there something happening?

I'm guessing the cop was at first just intending to walk over to the sidewalk. Got angry at cyclists not stopping, and at the last moment "picked" that one to knock down.

132 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:58:25am

The cop should hire Blago's attorney.

"These charges against my client are an outrage, your honor. My client is not only a police officer trying to keep the peace in New York City, but was, at that very moment, a pedestrian crossing the street. That bicyclist failed to yield to a pedestrian who has the right of way even when not a police officer. In fact, he was defending himself your honor - defending himself from the assault that the bicyclist perpetrated upon him as he rode his vehicle into my client's path"

133 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:58:31am

re: #115 Walter L. Newton

Oh, I see, he was trying to cover his ass for being RIGHT.

Was he right? With what is getting reported I doubt we can say that. I sure can't say. All I know is the officer reported getting assaulted by the cyclist and the video shows something entirely different.

134 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:58:39am

Well ok, I've watched the video twice - including the slow motion part twice and I have to say that it looks to me as if that cop targeted that particular cyclist right from the get go - the cyclist does appear to be swerving towards the curb to avoid any contact and the cop just shoved him over.
Don't care what the cyclist may have said, that cop is toast based on this video and deservedly so.

135 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:58:40am

re: #118 MandyManners

I wonder which record was supposedly falsified.

From the article...

Pogan is accused of knocking Christopher Long off his bicycle without justification on June 25 during a bike ride organized by a group that promotes alternative transportation. Pogan had filed charges of resisting arrest, disorderly conduct and obstructing government administration against Long, but those charges were dismissed.
Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau said Pogan was charged with falsifying business records and filing a false instrument. Both are felonies punishable by sixteen months to four years in prison.

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

136 lawhawk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:16am

Bloomberg has proposed creating 1800 miles of bike lanes across NYC. That's despite the fact that cyclists don't use them, ignore traffic law, and the bike lanes in some areas were set up with absolutely no clue - Grand Street in particular, which now routinely creates traffic jams in the area as cars and trucks can't navigate the tight corners and traffic pattern set up by the DOT.

Bloomberg is doing everything imaginable to make the city inhospitable to vehicular traffic, and that plays into the hands of the Critical Mass goons who ride with reckless abandon time and time again, causing traffic jams and nightmares for thousands of drivers on a regular basis.

At the same time, this cop was out of line and deserves whatever judgment is handed down against him. He could have killed the cyclist.

137 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:26am

re: #119 Ben Hur

BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

NIRTH. NIRTH. NIRTH.

138 joncelli  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:34am

No excuses for the cop here. He should be accustomed to being insulted by now. Fire him at minimum, maybe some jail time to give his colleagues a little object lesson.

(Yes, the Critical Mass types are sanctimonious assholes. No, that's not an offense that merits being shoved off a bike.)

139 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:36am

But if the cop had ordered him to stop, and he refused, well thats a different matter.

140 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:37am

According to Code Pink, throwing shoes is only an "insult".

So, what if we went to the next Critical Mass bicycle protest and simply insulted them with shoes?

141 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:38am

re: #89 jcm

Exactly. The officer overstepped his bounds by not first attempting to stop the bicyclist. If he did, and it escalated to the point where the bicyclist was assaulting the officer, then the use of force might be justified. As it was, I saw no attempt to stop the bicyclist in the video, just a cross-check.

He should get more than 2 minutes in the sin bin for it.

142 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:38am

re: #126 Walter L. Newton

It's in the article that Charles linked to...

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

Geeessshhh.

That further toasts his ass.

A cop who falsified reports is useless.

Next case he testifies on the defense, only has to point out the cop fakes paperwork and presto reasonable doubt.

A Cops word HAS to be gold.

143 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:57am

re: #123 rawmuse

And San Francisco. My car was vandalized by these assholes, with me in it, drivine, and I was armed.

I let them live.

If that had happened to me, I would have lost it and done what that cop did. I'm not saying I would be right, I'd be wrong to do so. But I doubt I'd be able to control my temper. That's part of the reason I don't drive (don't even have a license).

144 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:58am

re: #127 Ben Hur

Of course those bikes were all localling made by hand and delivered to the retail shops on bikes.

And their chains are lubricated with sunflower oil from locally grown sunflowers.

145 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:59:59am

re: #122 Lincolntf

I suppose that a "cash settlement" will be forthcoming? I wonder what this one's gonna cost.

No suit's been filed. Yet.

146 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:00:00am

re: #129 MandyManners

Traffic's bad enough with those entitled assholes in their monster trucks and Hummers.

Huh?

To whom are you referring?

147 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:00:17am

Looks to me like the Critical Massholes were yelling abuse at the cops (that's what they do) and the cops lost their tempers. No excuse for assault, though. I think a case could be made for intent to commit murder. I know people who have received fractured skulls from falls exactly like that -- wearing helmets.

148 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:00:20am

re: #123 rawmuse

And San Francisco. My car was vandalized by these assholes, with me in it, drivine, and I was armed.

I let them live.

Thanks for the update. Yet another moonbat central city is where the scum do their protesting.

149 The Other Les  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:00:37am

re: #140 gmsc

According to Code Pink, throwing shoes is only an "insult".

So, what if we went to the next Critical Mass bicycle protest and simply insulted them with shoes?

I have some beat-up old combat boots.

150 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:00:47am

re: #124 Sharmuta

What records? What instrument? The initial charges against the cyclist?

151 bosforus  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:00:53am

I do not have the snarky and obnoxious "I hate cops" attitude but that cop needs to have the book thrown at him. And I hate him.

152 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:00:57am

re: #130 Sharmuta

This cop's a prick. He's the sort of guy that gives decent cops a bad name.

No he's not. we don't know what happened before the video. Maybe the cop got a bad donut earlier.

/s

153 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:01:01am

The officer involved is very young and inexperienced.

Patrick Pogan, 23, was arraigned on two felony and three misdemeanor charges in state Supreme Court.

...

Assistant District Attorney Richard Buckheit said Pogan, whose father is a retired detective, was suspended from the police force. Because he is a probationary officer, Pogan could be dismissed from the force even if he is cleared of all criminal charges.

154 Shug  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:01:07am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

I don't care. Those cyclists are obnoxious and hostile. Pounding them is a public service.

Welcome to China

155 SlartyBartfast  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:01:22am

re: #87 Ben Hur

Don't know if that would be appropriate?

Some might not appreciate the temptation.

I can say "No" to anything but temptation...

156 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:01:24am

re: #150 MandyManners

That's from the link at the top of the thread.

157 bulwrk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:01:39am

re: #106 Walter L. Newton

What in heaven's name, short of killing someone off camera


He could have injured someone down the street and failed to stop for another officer who tried a less aggressive method to stop him. I am not defending his actions but we just don't know yet.

158 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:01:51am

re: #127 Ben Hur

Of course those bikes were all localling made by hand and delivered to the retail shops on bikes.

And they're made of hemp.

159 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:01:59am

re: #131 Occasional Reader

I'm guessing the cop was at first just intending to walk over to the sidewalk. Got angry at cyclists not stopping, and at the last moment "picked" that one to knock down.

What if that had been a car? Would the cop not have done something to save his butt, such as stopping for a second?

160 stevedecatur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:02:20am

I'd like to believe the cop decided he would get out of the street to avoid being hit by the incoming mass of cyclists.

Then he felt threatened, as if that one cyclist was swerving close to the curb in a deliberate attempt to cut off his escape path.

161 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:02:26am

re: #139 maddogg

But if the cop had ordered him to stop, and he refused, well thats a different matter.

What. The cop yelled stop when. When the driver was a half a block away? A half a second before he slammed him.

Did anyone read the article, which fills in some detail...

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

162 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:02:42am

re: #154 Shug

Welcome to China

what does that mean?

163 Steve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:02:48am

re: #106 Walter L. Newton

What in heaven's name, short of killing someone off camera, could he have done that would give the cop a right to slam him off the bike in such a way that could have instantly killed him.

Good God, he was moving at good clip and went pounding into the cement pavement, he didn't even land on the bit softer asphalt.

That (in bold) is the point. We do not know.

164 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:02:58am

re: #135 Walter L. Newton

From the article...

Pogan is accused of knocking Christopher Long off his bicycle without justification on June 25 during a bike ride organized by a group that promotes alternative transportation. Pogan had filed charges of resisting arrest, disorderly conduct and obstructing government administration against Long, but those charges were dismissed.
Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau said Pogan was charged with falsifying business records and filing a false instrument. Both are felonies punishable by sixteen months to four years in prison.

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

That was my guess.

165 FrogMarch  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:03:12am

Keep the cameras rolling. That's all I can say.

166 capitalist piglet  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:03:15am

re: #152 Walter L. Newton

No he's not. we don't know what happened before the video. Maybe the cop got a bad donut earlier.

/s

There is no such thing.

167 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:03:26am

re: #157 bulwrk

What in heaven's name, short of killing someone off camera


He could have injured someone down the street and failed to stop for another officer who tried a less aggressive method to stop him. I am not defending his actions but we just don't know yet.


Yes, we do... see links upthread. If that's what happened, odd that the cop didn't put it in his report.

168 ASU86PE  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:03:29am

I loved this. His Offensive line coach would have been proud of the block.


And the cyclists are supposed to yield to pedestrians.

I say, "INNOCENT ON ALL CHARGES".

169 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:03:41am

re: #147 Charles

Looks to me like the Critical Massholes were yelling abuse at the cops (that's what they do) and the cops lost their tempers. No excuse for assault, though. I think a case could be made for intent to commit murder. I know people who have received fractured skulls from falls exactly like that -- wearing helmets.

An attempt to commit murder would require the cop to have known before hand that such an act would have some likelihood of resulting in the guys death. From the shape of the cop, I am assuming he is not a cyclist and probably didn't realize what level of harm he could have done. Had the dude died, it would be manslaughter but probably not murder, IMHO.

170 Shug  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:03:57am

re: #162 Dark_Falcon

what does that mean?

That's the behavior in China.

This is America. That punk on the bicycle has rights which this cop violated.
I'd prefer not to live in a nation where the police can just beat me for no reason other than they don't like me

171 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:03:57am

re: #123 rawmuse
Why?

172 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:04am
173 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:10am

re: #168 ASU86PE

Does the ASU stand for Arizona State?

174 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:10am

re: #152 Walter L. Newton

No he's not. we don't know what happened before the video. Maybe the cop got a bad donut earlier.

/s

Cops have it hard enough as it is, they don't need pricks like this further damaging their credibility.

175 lawhawk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:15am

re: #142 jcm

As you say, falsifying the reports will do in this cop. It's illegal and it threatens any and all actions made in this guy's official capacity as a police officer. Any convictions made based on his statements can be called in question, and defense teams would try to reopen cases involving him on that basis. Thankfully, he's a probey, so there's not much chance that he's going to upset too many cases.

It's a firing offense, and that's the best course of action by the NYPD.

176 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:17am

re: #157 bulwrk

What in heaven's name, short of killing someone off camera

He could have injured someone down the street and failed to stop for another officer who tried a less aggressive method to stop him. I am not defending his actions but we just don't know yet.

Did you read the article above. It says that the cop did it because the rider swerved to hit the cop on purpose.

READ THE ARTICLE

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]


GEEESSSHHH

177 saberry0530  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:20am

re: #121 jcm

I just about killed a bunch of Critical Massholes one night.

They blew a red light just as I was entering on the green. Fortunately, and I don't now how I didn't hit any of them. They surrounded my truck and pounded on it. Eventually they moved on.

Good thing I'm a pretty calm and guy, and reasonable.

I only had 31 rounds and there was about 80 of them.
///on the last line.


If ya'd taken out say fifteen of them the rest would have scattered like roaches
///

178 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:32am

re: #161 Walter L. Newton

Did anyone read the article

I did.

179 Ben Hur  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:42am

Sh*t.

Gotta go.

BBL.

180 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:04:53am
181 clgood  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:05:02am

I say the officer is not guilty by reason of insanity - on the part of the cyclist.

Not only was he part of Critical Mass, meaning he's a violent creep and a cretin, but he wasn't wearing a helmet which means he has nothing to protect!

182 johnnygriswold  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:05:07am

cop was an a-hole and the cyclists are a-holes. it's a wash.

183 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:05:26am

re: #163 Steve

That (in bold) is the point. We do not know.

Did you read the article above. It says that the cop did it because the rider swerved to hit the cop on purpose.

READ THE ARTICLE

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

184 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:05:58am

re: #170 Shug

I'd prefer not to live in a nation where the police can just beat me for no reason other than they don't like me

Get a haircut, hippie!

/

185 yma o hyd  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:06:32am

re: #94 buzzsawmonkey

The delivery folks on bicycles are among the worst offenders as far as no-lights, no-reflectors, and riding against traffic/running lights/ignoring signs are concerned.

They can deliver food and still abide by the traffic laws.

If people want to ride bikes, fine; if the city wants to encourage them to do so, fine. But let them be treated as the vehicles they are.

A serious three-month crackdown on cyclist scofflaws would vastly improve the quality of life in New York.


Not just in New York, sigh ...

Looks like riding a bicycle in town (clad in Spandex shorts, no matter what the weather, for example ...) does something funny to the rider's brain ...

186 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:07:11am

re: #182 johnnygriswold

cop was an a-hole and the cyclists are a-holes. it's a wash.

Doesn't give cops the right to assault people. Do we really want to give law enforcement cart blanche? I sure as hell don't.

187 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:07:22am

re: #37 Walter L. Newton

IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER. Are you crazy. That sounds like the same damn argument that someone gives for beating their wife.

whoa, whoa, whoa. Although I completely believe that what the cop did, from what I saw in that video, was uncalled for, you cannot outrightly discount that there could have been a justifiable reason that was off camera.

188 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:07:27am

re: #183 Walter L. Newton

It says that the cop did it because the rider swerved to hit the cop on purpose.

Er... what?

189 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:07:28am

I read the article. I have no way of knowing how much was left out. I hate leftists so I am biased.

190 Randall Gross  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:07:47am

They were both clearly in the wrong, but the cop moreso.
The cyclist should stop if someone's in the xwalk, not swerve around, that's standard traffic law. Stop for pedestrians in the crosswalk, and the cyclist did not.

The cop used overmuch force by far and endangered the cyclist as well as the bystanders with his actions, which is way out of line for a minor scofflaw violation.

191 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:07:56am

This quote from the article, plus the video, should answer all your questions.

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

192 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:07:59am

re: #169 karmic_inquisitor

An attempt to commit murder would require the cop to have known before hand that such an act would have some likelihood of resulting in the guys death. From the shape of the cop, I am assuming he is not a cyclist and probably didn't realize what level of harm he could have done. Had the dude died, it would be manslaughter but probably not murder, IMHO.

I won't argue the level of charges but, shouldn't a cop know what kind of damage a cyclist can incur when thrown from his bike onto asphalt/concrete? Bikes aren't UFO's.

193 Desert Dog  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:08:05am

re: #175 lawhawk

As you say, falsifying the reports will do in this cop. It's illegal and it threatens any and all actions made in this guy's official capacity as a police officer. Any convictions made based on his statements can be called in question, and defense teams would try to reopen cases involving him on that basis. Thankfully, he's a probey, so there's not much chance that he's going to upset too many cases.

It's a firing offense, and that's the best course of action by the NYPD.

Knocking the biker down was bad, but it's the lying after the fact that will get him. The cover up is usually worse than the crime

194 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:08:30am

re: #187 WrathofG-d

whoa, whoa, whoa. Although I completely believe that what the cop did, from what I saw in that video, was uncalled for, you cannot outrightly discount that there could have been a justifiable reason that was off camera.

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

195 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:08:47am

re: #188 Occasional Reader

Er... what?

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

196 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:08:50am

re: #134 realwest

Well ok, I've watched the video twice - including the slow motion part twice and I have to say that it looks to me as if that cop targeted that particular cyclist right from the get go - the cyclist does appear to be swerving towards the curb to avoid any contact and the cop just shoved him over.
Don't care what the cyclist may have said, that cop is toast based on this video and deservedly so.

Agree, but the cyclist does not help his case by not having stopped. I assume his bicycle has breaks. Had a car attempted to swerve past a cop the driver would be in big trouble. Doesn't excuse the cop nailing the guy.

197 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:09:09am

I have great respect for law enforcement, but I'm not going to defend rouge cops going out of their way to assault people. This cop fucking LIED in his report that the biker steered into him.

198 Steve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:09:09am

re: #149 The Other Les

I have some beat-up old combat boots.

I have some steel-toed ones you could use.

199 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:09:17am

re: #40 Ford_Prefect

I am not defending this officer, but we don't know the whole story just from this video. I will agree that even if he was justified in stopping this cyclist he could have done it less violently.

The Rott and a number of other sites looked at this a number of months ago. I tend to go with the LEO on this one. The video was taken by one of the activist and does not show any events leading up to the event. How long had it been going on for and what did this cyclist do earlier on the ride? We do not know.

200 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:09:29am

re: #180 wiffersnapper

hehe, pretty cool vid

Not funny, twit.

201 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:09:51am

re: #170 Shug

That's the behavior in China.

This is America. That punk on the bicycle has rights which this cop violated.
I'd prefer not to live in a nation where the police can just beat me for no reason other than they don't like me

I agree with you. My comment was written in a font of anger about bikers like that. I've though about it and I think a good police operation to corral such a ride and arrest its participants would be a proper response. Their punishment would include the confiscation and public destruction by steamroller of their bicycles.

202 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:09:57am

re: #171 realwest

Because had I shot them (which they richly deserved) I would have been in a world of shit.
But, maybe it would have been worth it.
I would get a lot of writing done in prison. Plus I would get lots of cards and letters from well wishers. I'm sure of that.

203 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:10:04am

re: #169 karmic_inquisitor

An attempt to commit murder would require the cop to have known before hand that such an act would have some likelihood of resulting in the guys death. From the shape of the cop, I am assuming he is not a cyclist and probably didn't realize what level of harm he could have done. Had the dude died, it would be manslaughter but probably not murder, IMHO.

Why does everyone call this "an attempt to commit murder", or state that it could have "killed" someone. I am aware that Charles made this claim (ie: that it could have killed him) but that alone doesn't make it true. Although obviously painful, I highly question anyone that states that the tackle by the cop "could have killed him". It seems like emotional hyperbole to me.

Uncalled for? Most likely. Painful? Definitely! Attempted Murder? Give me a ___'n break!

204 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:10:37am

re: #195 Walter L. Newton

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

Okay, that's what the article says the cop claimed[falsely, so it would seem], not what "it [the article] says"...

205 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:11:14am

re: #197 Sharmuta

I'm not going to defend rouge cops

That officer's sexual orientation is none of your damn business!

206 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:11:26am

re: #202 rawmuse

Because had I shot them (which they richly deserved) I would have been in a world of shit.
But, maybe it would have been worth it.
I would get a lot of writing done in prison. Plus I would get lots of cards and letters from well wishers. I'm sure of that.

Don't forget the love and companionship many find in prison...

/:)

207 Steve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:11:27am

re: #183 Walter L. Newton

Did you read the article above. It says that the cop did it because the rider swerved to hit the cop on purpose.

READ THE ARTICLE

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

Yes, I did. but what happened before the video?

208 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:11:29am

re: #194 Walter L. Newton

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

Thank you for that additional information. It does make one doubt that any actual justification could have existed if the cop didn't include it in his report, and instead lied.

209 Shug  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:06am

re: #201 Dark_Falcon

I agree with you. My comment was written in a font of anger about bikers like that. I've though about it and I think a good police operation to corral such a ride and arrest its participants would be a proper response. Their punishment would include the confiscation and public destruction by steamroller of their bicycles.


ha !

210 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:13am

re: #202 rawmuse

Because had I shot them (which they richly deserved) I would have been in a world of shit.
But, maybe it would have been worth it.
I would get a lot of writing done in prison. Plus I would get lots of cards and letters from well wishers. I'm sure of that.

You'd also have a much more "diverse" love life!

211 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:17am

If the cyclist had been seriously injured or killed, would people here still be blaming him?

212 nyc redneck  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:24am

he really slammed that guy. i looks like he went over the line.
but i hate anarchists like these jerks. they are total trouble makers.
i think it is a testament to the professionalism of our police force here that this kind of thing does not happen very often.
especially considering the stress our cops are under since 9-ll.

213 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:25am

re: #203 WrathofG-d

Why does everyone call this "an attempt to commit murder", or state that it could have "killed" someone. I am aware that Charles made this claim (ie: that it could have killed him) but that alone doesn't make it true. Although obviously painful, I highly question anyone that states that the tackle by the cop "could have killed him". It seems like emotional hyperbole to me.

Uncalled for? Most likely. Painful? Definitely! Attempted Murder? Give me a ___'n break!

Holy shit, are you kidding. So, there is no way in you mind that the rider could not have been killed by that stunt?

214 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:34am

re: #205 Occasional Reader

That officer's sexual orientation is none of your damn business!

Beat me to it.

215 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:37am

While I don't condone the cops "takedown" it's clear to me this guy was singled out for a reason. The falsifying of the report also concerns me.

That being said, most cyclists are assholes. The act like they own the freaking road PLUS they also ride on the sidewalks. I've been hit several times by these jerks while out walking my dog and they have the nerve to yell at me for getting in their way. They get REALLY offended when I tell them to get their asses off the sidewalk. Most of the time they look like they'd like to attack me for saying it - except I have a dog with me. heh!

216 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:42am

re: #183 Walter L. Newton
Walter - I agree that this cop's behavior is indefenseable, but honestly, I'm not so sure that the cyclist swerved to avoid hitting the cop - the cop sure as hell didn't slow down his pace though (which would have enabled the cyclist to avoid hitting him). In any event, this cop should be a)fired and b) tried for assault (I disagree with Charles on intentional murder here, intentionally hurt - and hurt badly - but not intentional murder). If the cyclist had been killed, then I think manslaughter charges would have or should have been brought against the cop).
And hey y'all, even though those "critical mass" folks are idiots and, imo, violating the law, that doesn't excuse what that cop did. Not in the least.

217 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:12:52am

re: #191 Walter L. Newton

This quote from the article, plus the video, should answer all your questions.

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

Which, quite frankly, is contrary to the video evidence where Long obviously steered his bike away from Pogan. You can go around the officer as long as he does not ask you to stop, which, Pogan did not in the video.

He's toast in court, not just in the public eye.

218 yma o hyd  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:13:02am

re: #136 lawhawk

Bloomberg has proposed creating 1800 miles of bike lanes across NYC. That's despite the fact that cyclists don't use them, ignore traffic law, and the bike lanes in some areas were set up with absolutely no clue - Grand Street in particular, which now routinely creates traffic jams in the area as cars and trucks can't navigate the tight corners and traffic pattern set up by the DOT.

Bloomberg is doing everything imaginable to make the city inhospitable to vehicular traffic, and that plays into the hands of the Critical Mass goons who ride with reckless abandon time and time again, causing traffic jams and nightmares for thousands of drivers on a regular basis.

At the same time, this cop was out of line and deserves whatever judgment is handed down against him. He could have killed the cyclist.

Gawd, what is it with these loonie mayors and city councils!

Trying to obstruct traffic flow by building chicanes, cycle paths, you anem it - and then howling about bad traffic congestion and that the traffic jams pollute the air ...
Its happening everywhere - even here.

219 bulwrk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:13:09am

re: #176 Walter L. Newton

I did read the article where does it say that?

220 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:13:24am

Wow! I know the lefties like to claim police brutality too often- perhaps it's a boy who cried wolf phenomenon, but when actual police brutality occurs- I don't think it should be excused simply because it happened to a leftist.

WTH is wrong with some of you?

221 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:14:00am

First they came for the asshole protesters, and I did nothing because I was not an asshole protester.

222 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:14:09am

whoa!...NYPDs Finest (take down)...that was way friggin rude imore: #158 Occasional Reader

And they're made of hemp.

or maybe bamboo...it's the wave of the pasture
[Link: www.americanbamboo.org...]

223 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:14:17am

re: #207 Steve

Yes, I did. but what happened before the video?

There is ZERO evidence or suggestion - not even, apparently, in the cop's (falsified) report, at least from the press accounts - that the cyclist had committed a crime moments before the incident, and the cop was trying to arrest him for it. None. Nada. Zip. So let's just get that red herring off the table, shall we?

224 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:14:30am

re: #213 Walter L. Newton

Holy shit, are you kidding. So, there is no way in you mind that the rider could not have been killed by that stunt?

Could he have been killed? Sure, but on "could" be killed when using a pencil. My point is not that he "could" not have been killed by that tackle, but that it is highly unlikely. I'm sure that if Charles had instead stated that the cop attempted to push him through a window y'all would be passionately defending that false assumption as well.

Is it possible that that move could kill someone? Sure. Likely? No.

225 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:15:10am

re: #201 Dark_Falcon

I don't mind the down ding DF but please comment on why.

226 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:15:33am

re: #175 lawhawk

As you say, falsifying the reports will do in this cop. It's illegal and it threatens any and all actions made in this guy's official capacity as a police officer. Any convictions made based on his statements can be called in question, and defense teams would try to reopen cases involving him on that basis. Thankfully, he's a probey, so there's not much chance that he's going to upset too many cases.

It's a firing offense, and that's the best course of action by the NYPD.

If the cop had, said "shit I screwed up and shouldn't have done that!"
He'd get a suspension, and letter in his jacket.

As I was told in training, were all human, we all screw up. As a cop the one thing you cannot ever ever do is lie about it.

227 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:15:33am

re: #220 Sharmuta

Wow! I know the lefties like to claim police brutality too often- perhaps it's a boy who cried wolf phenomenon, but when actual police brutality occurs- I don't think it should be excused simply because it happened to a leftist.

WTH is wrong with some of you?

Amen, Sharmuta!

Sometimes I wonder about the newbies around here.

228 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:15:37am

re: #211 MandyManners

If the cyclist had been seriously injured or killed, would people here still be blaming him?

To be clear, I do "blame" the cyclist for participating in what is basically a rolling act of vandalism, and also for not slowing down/stopping when he could see there were two pedestrians in the street. But that doesn't justify what the cop did.

229 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:15:59am

re: #225 Erik The Red

I don't mind the down ding DF but please comment on why.

An error. It has been corrected.

230 Shug  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:16:03am

That cop was well out of line.

I can't believe people can defend him.

He gives a bad name to the 99% of police out there who have a very hard and dangerous job to do.
His actions put his fellow officers at risk.

and people defend him after watching the video?

231 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:16:13am

re: #203 WrathofG-d

I am aware that Charles made this claim (ie: that it could have killed him) but that alone doesn't make it true.

FYI. I knew a girl who was killed in a fall very much like this when she was knocked off her bike by an opening car door.

232 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:16:18am

re: #219 bulwrk

I did read the article where does it say that?

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

233 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:16:37am

re: #220 Sharmuta
I agree with you 100%. That was clearly an attempt by that cop to hurt that cyclist. Period. No excuses, no bullshit - the cop went (or was) crazy.

234 Desert Dog  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:16:44am

re: #225 Erik The Red

I don't mind the down ding DF but please comment on why.

You can tell who is dingin' ya? I never knew that

235 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:00am

re: #227 WrathofG-d

Amen, Sharmuta!

Sometimes I wonder about the newbies around here.

It isn't just newbies.

236 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:05am
237 beens21  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:20am

re: #59 Charles

Another video taken from a different angle doesn't show the hit, but shows police stopping another cyclist, then the cop running toward the guy right after hitting him.

[Link: www.youtube.com...]

it appears to me that the trigger was the last group was running a red light at a crosswalk.note one biker stops but others keep going. no excuse,but I think that is what triggered the tackle.

238 lawhawk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:33am

re: #218 yma o hyd

Here's a sampling of the bike lane craziness in NYC.


Transportation alternatives in NYC just got more expensive. The MTA passed its doomsday budget. Major fare hikes.

239 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:36am

re: #224 WrathofG-d

Sure, but on "could" be killed when using a pencil. My point

Geez, how sharp do you like your pencils?
;)

240 tfc3rid  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:36am

re: #79 Ben Hur

I have started to see memorials to killed bicyclists put up around the NYC.

Bikes painted white and chained to a sign, with the victim's name, etc.

Yes... There is one on Broadway and 36th Street.

241 spinordie  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:49am

This is old news...

242 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:17:51am

Here is a website by and for Vehicular Cyclists. They are the opposite of Critical Mass cyclists.

243 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:18:22am

re: #229 Dark_Falcon

Thanks. This is a very touchy subject. From the video alone there is no way that it tells the whole story. There is more to this. If all the facts are presented and the LEO is found guilty than the system works.

244 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:18:26am

re: #228 Occasional Reader

To be clear, I do "blame" the cyclist for participating in what is basically a rolling act of vandalism, and also for not slowing down/stopping when he could see there were two pedestrians in the street. But that doesn't justify what the cop did.

Yeah, but ... remember this was an organized protest with hundreds of cyclists/jerks taking over the street. The cops weren't just pedestrians, they were in the street to monitor the protest. And that cop wasn't just crossing the street, he acted in a deliberate way to knock the cyclist off his bike.

245 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:18:38am

re: #241 spinordie

This is old news...

And, what's your problem?

246 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:18:46am

re: #213 Walter L. Newton

Holy shit, are you kidding. So, there is no way in you mind that the rider could not have been killed by that stunt?

For it to be murder, the murderer has to know that his/her action would likely result in death. That is how you can have attempted murder - when the attempt fails, even by chance.

Manslaughter would be more likely - had the cop wanted the guy dead, he had a sidearm (I assume). Not to excuse the cop - he put a member of the public at harm that was completely unwarranted - he could have motioned the guy to stop (he didn't) and then tried to stop him afterward. Seems obvious he wanted to teach the guy a lesson with a little cop-love, probably not realizing the harm he was subjecting the guy to.

247 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:18:57am

re: #231 Charles

FYI. I knew a girl who was killed in a fall very much like this when she was knocked off her bike by an opening car door.

I am very sorry to hear that about the girl.

248 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:19:01am

re: #236 buzzsawmonkey

I think in this case "brutality" is warranted.

249 AKAK  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:19:03am

re: #203 WrathofG-d

Why does everyone call this "an attempt to commit murder", or state that it could have "killed" someone. I am aware that Charles made this claim (ie: that it could have killed him) but that alone doesn't make it true. Although obviously painful, I highly question anyone that states that the tackle by the cop "could have killed him". It seems like emotional hyperbole to me.

Uncalled for? Most likely. Painful? Definitely! Attempted Murder? Give me a ___'n break!

Surely could have killed him, depending on fall if not wearing a helmet.

250 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:19:09am

re: #231 Charles

FYI. I knew a girl who was killed in a fall very much like this when she was knocked off her bike by an opening car door.

Okay, but it's true that the bar for attempted "murder" is quite high. I mean, in theory, every time someone falls over, they could hit their head on the pavement and die. But it's very unlikely you'd see murder (or attempted murder) charges filed against someone for merely tripping a person.

251 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:19:14am

re: #202 rawmuse
Yeah, I know - but you know you DO have a right to protect your property and, more importantly, yourself.
Had you a justifiable reason to fear for your life (like if one or more had tried to open your car door) I think you'd have been justified in shooting.

252 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:19:32am

re: #220 Sharmuta

Wow! I know the lefties like to claim police brutality too often- perhaps it's a boy who cried wolf phenomenon, but when actual police brutality occurs- I don't think it should be excused simply because it happened to a leftist.

WTH is wrong with some of you?


DING!

253 2by2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:19:44am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

I don't care. Those cyclists are obnoxious and hostile. Pounding them is a public service.

I have been a road biker for almost 35 years (off and on) and have done some racing as well, when I was a kid. Cycling is far more dangerous than you might expect, the cyclist is the most vulnerable participant in traffic. Over the years I escaped a lot of hairy situations, being passed by trucks with an inch to spare, forced off the road onto a soft shoulder, (dramatic deceleration most likely to result in head over handlebar) , dooring (car door flings open suddenly, leaving you to chose either hitting it, or veering into traffic) pedestrians who can't make up their minds ( going back and forth, crossing a road, making it difficult to navigate by them) etc.
A friend broke his collar bone, thanks to a Lady crossing the road in the park with her dog on a 20 feet leash.
What this cop did, was blatantly putting that biker up for a serious injury, (collar bone, head injury, or spinal injury).
While I do not support critical mass and would never take part in it, I find your statement obnoxious and absolutely careless.
That cop doesn't deserve to be on duty in my city at all.

254 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:20:08am

re: #205 Occasional Reader

Heh.

255 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:20:25am

re: #219 bulwrk

I did read the article where does it say that?

Did you get your answer to your question?

256 eschew_obfuscation  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:20:39am

re: #234 Desert Dog

You can tell who is dingin' ya? I never knew that

In order for you to see who dings you, you must subscribe to my Super Dinger Vision service. Only $50/month.

(Seriously...just click the number of dings...it will show you a list of who did the dinging).

257 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:20:53am

re: #237 beens21

it appears to me that the trigger was the last group was running a red light at a crosswalk.note one biker stops but others keep going. no excuse,but I think that is what triggered the tackle.

Wonderful addition to this conversation!

258 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:21:00am

re: #183 Walter L. Newton

I read the article. This happened during "a bike ride". Technically true I guess, but hardly accurate.
Still, it looks like the cop nailed him. Then again, sometimes a football penalty looks perfectly clear until you see a completely different angle.

259 Desert Dog  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:21:33am

re: #256 eschew_obfuscation

In order for you to see who dings you, you must subscribe to my Super Dinger Vision service. Only $50/month.

(Seriously...just click the number of dings...it will show you a list of who did the dinging).

Wow, I never knew that! Thank you

260 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:21:47am

re: #258 Lincolntf

I read the article. This happened during "a bike ride". Technically true I guess, but hardly accurate.
Still, it looks like the cop nailed him. Then again, sometimes a football penalty looks perfectly clear until you see a completely different angle.

Did you read his fucking statement...

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

261 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:22:11am

re: #13 Charles

You can see the cop zero in on the approaching rider, then position himself and shove him right onto the sidewalk. He could easily have killed that guy.

No doubt involved. Wonder why he picked that particular cyclist?

262 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:22:17am

re: #253 2by2

Cycling is far more dangerous than you might expect, the cyclist is the most vulnerable participant in traffic.

Practically every time I ride, I seem to have at least one "near miss". The odds are bound to catch up with you from time to time. (So far, worst I've suffered is a small fracture in my right elbow, based on a novice rollerblader in Central Park suddenly getting nervous and deciding that my passing bike and I would be a good thing to grab for stability.)

263 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:22:48am

re: #251 realwest

The attack broke off when I took my (huge) Colt 1911 out of the glove box and chambered a round. The attackers decided that they should find better targets for their political statements.

At that point, had I fired, I am the bad guy, according to the laws of the state of CA.

California has some very precise and restrictive gun laws. And some pretty fucked up ones, too.

264 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:22:55am

re: #249 AKAK

Surely could have killed him, depending on fall if not wearing a helmet.

You all are wondering into "could it happen land", which is just simply ridiculous. Of course, I couldn't argue that death from that tackle is impossible. Anything is essentially possible. It is simply my opinion that it is highly unlikely.

Under your logic, almost anything could be considered an attempt to kill someone.

265 iam7545  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:22:56am

The cop deserves everything he gets. I am a roadie and used to race. I have been run off the road many times and have been in group rides where people and cars take out aggression on us. Most courts do not take the offense seriously. Cell phones with cameras are a great weapon. I had a guy prosecuted that intentionally ran me off the road. The judge was not aware of the Law and Case Law regarding bicyclists to I was forced to embarrass him.

I admire NYC for taking this seriously. I wonder if they would have done so if he was not caught on tape.

266 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:22:58am

re: #244 Charles

Yeah, but ... remember this was an organized protest with hundreds of cyclists/jerks taking over the street. The cops weren't just pedestrians, they were in the street to monitor the protest. And that cop wasn't just crossing the street, he acted in a deliberate way to knock the cyclist off his bike.

Yes he did. Does the video tell the whole story? It does not.

267 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:23:04am

re: #261 Outrider

No doubt involved. Wonder why he picked that particular cyclist?

random...it just coincided with his fuse burning down

268 2by2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:23:04am

re: #147 Charles

Looks to me like the Critical Massholes were yelling abuse at the cops (that's what they do) and the cops lost their tempers. No excuse for assault, though. I think a case could be made for intent to commit murder. I know people who have received fractured skulls from falls exactly like that -- wearing helmets.

I fully agree, Charles
you can loose your life due to a fall like this.
These groups are putting themselves and others in real danger, biking is dangerous enough as it is; so my sympathies are not with them as a whole, but that still doesn't warrant that push by thhis cop.

269 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:23:06am

re: #258 Lincolntf
Sorry - look at the video again - especially the slo-mo part and I don't care WHAT ANGLE you see "the play" that cop deliberately shoved that guy, knocking him onto the sidewalk.

270 AKAK  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:23:20am

The riot when he gets off the charges should be entertaining.

271 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:23:52am

re: #260 Walter L. Newton

90% he's guilty, 10% innocent. I'm just keeping an open mind. 3 weeks on the force is a bigger red flag. This is what probation is for. He'll be gone.

272 Randall Gross  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:23:57am

Here's an excercise: Watch the film twice, once pretending that the cyclist is your dumbass little brother, the second time pretending the cop is your dumbass little brother.

The truth and what's right probably lies between those two views, and usually when we have a case of wrong doing, it's the person who initiates force at fault.

273 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:07am

re: #253 2by2

Check my #19 and #201. I have recanted that statement and proposed a better alternative. Though I cannot blame you for laying into me as soon as you read that, since I asked for it.

274 LGoPs  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:09am

I'm generally inclined to give police the benefit of the doubt. They do a tough job that many of us wouldn't. I can't see the video since it's blocked here at work but I have a word picture in my mind from all the posts.
2 observations:
1) I would hate to have a job where I was being videotaped. Nobody can long withstand the scrutiny of being under a microscope. On the other hand, the knowledge that you are should lead to more judicious behavior...
2) Why are so many cyclists so obnoxious? It's their self-righteous attitude that frosts my ass...

275 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:20am

re: #263 rawmuse

The attack broke off when I took my (huge) Colt 1911 out of the glove box and chambered a round.

At that point, society suddenly became much more polite.

276 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:21am

re: #261 Outrider

No doubt involved. Wonder why he picked that particular cyclist?

see the response/video to Charles above by "Beens21" that shoes that the cyclist had run a red light, and avoided arrest by another cop up street.

277 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:36am

re: #266 Erik The Red

Yes he did. Does the video tell the whole story? It does not.

The cop told the whole story, in his report...

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

278 Amer-I-Can  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:48am

He's done and good riddance. NY is bad enough without cops like that on the force. The falsification of documents will cost him more than the shove.

279 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:53am

re: #269 realwest

Sorry - look at the video again - especially the slo-mo part and I don't care WHAT ANGLE you see "the play" that cop deliberately shoved that guy, knocking him onto the sidewalk.

No doubt. The LEO targeted this guy. I ask once again does anyone know why?

280 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:24:55am

re: #253 2by2

I give cyclists all the breaks I can. One is just courtesy, but mainly I DON'T WANT A CYCLIST UNDER MY CAR!

Even the a Critical Masshole!

No matter how obnoxious a cyclist is, I don't want him under my car. Not that I care that much about an asshole on two wheels. It's gonna' cost me time and money dealing with the aftermath.

281 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:25:06am

OT: Chinese Spam/Virus whatever alert.

I just got an e-mail that had some details in it (specific to my work and workplace) that made me think that it was a legitimate business e-mail regarding something to do with China. It looked suspicious so I tried to call the telephone number in the body-it was out of service-anyway, I ran my anti-virus software and it was something nasty.

Anyone else get anything similar today? And no-it wasn't a ENHANCE YOUR ORGAN or INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY e-mail...

282 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:25:10am

re: #264 WrathofG-d

Under your logic, almost anything could be considered an attempt to kill someone.

Your post nearly gave me a heart attack!

ARREST WRATH!

283 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:25:27am

re: #272 Thanos

Here's an excercise: Watch the film twice, once pretending that the cyclist is your dumbass little brother, the second time pretending the cop is your dumbass little brother.

The truth and what's right probably lies between those two views, and usually when we have a case of wrong doing, it's the person who initiates force at fault.

Well, thank you Dr. Phil.
/

284 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:25:47am

re: #272 Thanos

Good post.

285 kindadifferent  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:25:49am

Pushing anyone off a bike is a violent thing to do. What the cop did is blatantly wrong & is exactly the same thing as forcing a car to drive off a bridge. North American drivers feel they own the road and pedestrians and cyclists are always putting their lives at risk when they have to share the road with cars. I kept my son home from school today so he wouldn't get hit by a car walking to school; he normally bikes. We have lots of snow here on Vancouver Island and no sidewalks for kids to walk to school on so when it snows, it's a life or death situation...Notice how fat the policeman was?

286 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:25:59am

re: #279 Erik The Red

No doubt. The LEO targeted this guy. I ask once again does anyone know why?

see the response/video to Charles above by "Beens21" that shoes that the cyclist had run a red light, and avoided arrest by another cop up street.

287 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:26:35am

re: #282 Occasional Reader

Your post nearly gave me a heart attack!

ARREST WRATH!



ARREST WRATH!

BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM!
Stop or I shoot!

Fixed!
///

288 tfc3rid  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:26:37am

re: #238 lawhawk

Here's a sampling of the bike lane craziness in NYC.


Transportation alternatives in NYC just got more expensive. The MTA passed its doomsday budget. Major fare hikes.

Eh, we're all made of money... It's fine...

289 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:26:55am

re: #280 jcm

I give cyclists all the breaks I can. One is just courtesy, but mainly I DON'T WANT A CYCLIST UNDER MY CAR!

Even the a Critical Masshole!

No matter how obnoxious a cyclist is, I don't want him under my car. Not that I care that much about an asshole on two wheels. It's gonna' cost me time and money dealing with the aftermath.

they know that and use your good intentions against you...that's what pisses me

290 ShowMeStateOfMind  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:26:56am

Everyone, everyone, everyone gets their day in court, if they would like it. If you as the accused wants that day in court, you clam up except to say Not Guilty when its your turn. Video or no.

I'm not defending anyone in this case. I just want to know that I would get the same opportunity to explain myself or defend myself or make sure that someone else had the burden of proof, before I went down for the count.

My $0.02...

291 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:02am

re: #283 Walter L. Newton

Well, thank you Dr. Phil.
/

Smack!

292 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:03am

re: #228 Occasional Reader

To be clear, I do "blame" the cyclist for participating in what is basically a rolling act of vandalism, and also for not slowing down/stopping when he could see there were two pedestrians in the street. But that doesn't justify what the cop did.

None of the other cyclists stopped/slowed down. Why single out this one?

293 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:37am

re: #286 WrathofG-d

see the response/video to Charles above by "Beens21" that shoes that the cyclist had run a red light, and avoided arrest by another cop up street.

It still doesn't matter. The force that the cop used was not right. And if he was SO right in what he did, then why did he falsify the report?
He knew he had jumped the shark. And that's the whole point.

294 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:37am

re: #231 Charles

FYI. I knew a girl who was killed in a fall very much like this when she was knocked off her bike by an opening car door.

When I was a student at CalPoly I was riding a bike in San Luis Obispo and got hit by a woman leaving a McDonalds drive through. Got a free ambulance ride to the hospital out of the deal. Had I been killed, she would not have gotten a murder charge but perhaps a manslaughter charge. Thing is that I doubt the cop realized he was using deadly force, and I doubt this because I have a low opinion of the cop. He is obviously an idiot. And yes - he could have killed the guy. I for one assume that the cop, like most of the non-cycling public, does not realize how someone can get killed that way.

295 FurryOldGuyJeans  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:40am

One less loose cannon cop on the streets.

296 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:40am

re: #250 Occasional Reader

Okay, but it's true that the bar for attempted "murder" is quite high. I mean, in theory, every time someone falls over, they could hit their head on the pavement and die. But it's very unlikely you'd see murder (or attempted murder) charges filed against someone for merely tripping a person.

Again, yeah but ... the difference between tripping someone as they walk along, and shoving someone off a bicycle moving at 15-20 mph is huge. I don't think any prosecutor would go for attempted murder, seriously; but I know from my own experience that there's no doubt at all -- the cop could have killed that cyclist.

297 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:46am

re: #289 albusteve

they know that and use your good intentions against you...that's what pisses me

Maybe I should drive a street sweeper...
;-P

298 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:48am

re: #286 WrathofG-d

Thanks Wrath thread going so fast what number post?

299 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:27:50am

re: #282 Occasional Reader

Your post nearly gave me a heart attack!

ARREST WRATH!

egads, your responding in such a manner could cause an emotionally unstable suicidal teenager to commit suicide, or kill someone. I could be that teenager.

Arrest you back for conspiracy to commit murder, and contributing the delinquency of a minor.

300 AKAK  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:28:04am

re: #276 WrathofG-d

see the response/video to Charles above by "Beens21" that shoes that the cyclist had run a red light, and avoided arrest by another cop up street.


Did he raise his hand as a stop signal?

301 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:28:17am

re: #267 albusteve

random...it just coincided with his fuse burning down

Nah - both cops zeroed right in on that one guy. Don't know why nothing was in the report, but he caught their attention in some way.

302 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:28:23am

re: #287 jcm


ARREST WRATH!

BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! BLAM!
Stop or I shoot!

Fixed!
///

Nice grouping!

///

303 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:28:32am

"First we kill all the lawyers..."

/

304 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:28:38am

re: #292 MandyManners

None of the other cyclists stopped/slowed down. Why single out this one?

They're all breaking the law. I blame them each, individually, for that. Again, doesn't justify the cop's actions, though.

305 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:04am

re: #296 Charles

Again, yeah but ... the difference between tripping someone as they walk along, and shoving someone off a bicycle moving at 15-20 mph is huge. I don't think any prosecutor would go for attempted murder, seriously; but I know from my own experience that there's no doubt at all -- the cop could have killed that cyclist.

Why would anyone here take your word for that?
/sarcasm

306 caligal  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:05am

ouch! no doubt about it, the cop clearly appears to give the cyclist a shove. maybe he was annoyed that the cyclist veered to the left to obstruct his way...even so, ya don't go pushing someone off their bike.

307 Ford_Prefect  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:10am

re: #285 kindadifferent

...Notice how fat the policeman was?

I am sorry, but what does this have to do with anything?

308 Randall Gross  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:15am

re: #281 WriterMom

OT: Chinese Spam/Virus whatever alert.

I just got an e-mail that had some details in it (specific to my work and workplace) that made me think that it was a legitimate business e-mail regarding something to do with China. It looked suspicious so I tried to call the telephone number in the body-it was out of service-anyway, I ran my anti-virus software and it was something nasty.

Anyone else get anything similar today? And no-it wasn't a ENHANCE YOUR ORGAN or INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY e-mail...

Please forward that mail to your security team, or lacking that to F-Secure or McAffee

309 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:16am
"The bicyclist's actions before my client took action caused him to take the action he did," defense lawyer Stuart London said as he left court.

Hahaha

310 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:26am

re: #267 albusteve

random...it just coincided with his fuse burning down

Could be. It looked like both officers started walking an intercept course at the same time towards the same cyclist. Neither officer looked particularly peeved. But they both started walking in the take down mode after the one cyclist.

Unless the cyclist had paper out on him, This officer has a hard trial coming up.

311 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:29am

re: #297 jcm

Maybe I should drive a street sweeper...
;-P

as well as carry one...WOOOK OUUUT!

312 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:31am

re: #303 WriterMom

"First we kill all the lawyers..."

/

Good thing I'm merely a male porn star.

313 yma o hyd  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:29:43am

re: #238 lawhawk

Here's a sampling of the bike lane craziness in NYC.


Transportation alternatives in NYC just got more expensive. The MTA passed its doomsday budget. Major fare hikes.

Heh - its catching:
Cyclists are allowed to cycle through our busiest pedestrian shopping centre ...

As for doomsday fare rises, thats catching as well: it affects all commuters, all over the country.
And of course the service will have to be reduced - thats modern life: pay more taxes/fares for worse service ...

314 nyc redneck  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:04am

re: #304 Occasional Reader

They're all breaking the law. I blame them each, individually, for that. Again, doesn't justify the cop's actions, though.

if i was on the jury for this guy's civil case against the city, i would probably find for him but award him only a dollar.

315 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:06am

re: #241 spinordie

This is old news...

The incident is old news, but the cop's plea in the case was today.

So, you like a high cadence?

316 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:10am

re: #285 kindadifferent

Pushing anyone off a bike is a violent thing to do. What the cop did is blatantly wrong & is exactly the same thing as forcing a car to drive off a bridge. North American drivers feel they own the road and pedestrians and cyclists are always putting their lives at risk when they have to share the road with cars. I kept my son home from school today so he wouldn't get hit by a car walking to school; he normally bikes. We have lots of snow here on Vancouver Island and no sidewalks for kids to walk to school on so when it snows, it's a life or death situation...Notice how fat the policeman was?

Are you a child? A fat policeman. What the fuck does that have to do with this story?

317 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:11am

re: #236 buzzsawmonkey
Buzz - Rodney King was a completely different matter (and btw, iirc, two or three LA County Sheriff tried to get the cops to stop beating King after he was pretty clearly down for the count) this is pretty damned straightforward: That cop deliberately and with intent, knocked that cyclist over onto the concrete side walk.
I think that Police Brutality is correct here.

318 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:20am

re: #301 vapig

Nah - both cops zeroed right in on that one guy. Don't know why nothing was in the report, but he caught their attention in some way.

roach clip dangling on the handlebars?

319 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:21am

re: #293 Walter L. Newton

Ugh, I think the Chanukkah season and Winter is making everyone a bit emotional, and testy. (or I misread your post)

I never said the cop was correct in the amount of force he used (although now that you mention it, insofar that the bike rider was possibly evading arrest). I was just answering the question of "WHY" which was asked.

321 2by2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:30am

re: #262 Occasional Reader

Practically every time I ride, I seem to have at least one "near miss". The odds are bound to catch up with you from time to time. (So far, worst I've suffered is a small fracture in my right elbow, based on a novice rollerblader in Central Park suddenly getting nervous and deciding that my passing bike and I would be a good thing to grab for stability.)

roller bladers in the park are the worst, and the one on both ends of the specter are the most dangerous; the ones who can't skate and the speed skaters, both rudder extremely with their arms, taking up a lot of space.
I don't ride during the day or on Sundays in the park anymore, best and safest times are between 9:00 and 11:00 PM during the week.

322 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:35am

re: #308 Thanos

I just trashed it, but you're right, that's probably a good idea.

The stuff in the e-mail was definitely written by a person, they had taken the time to check some details and personalize it.

323 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:30:39am
324 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:31:08am

re: #312 Occasional Reader

*phew*

325 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:31:20am

re: #300 AKAK

Did he raise his hand as a stop signal?

Nope, I did not see the officer do that in the video.

326 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:31:39am

re: #300 AKAK

I do not believe that he did. It is impossible from that video, (or at least my viewing of it) to know if the cop said anything.

HOWEVER, insofar that he falsified his report, I have a feeling he went a bit overboard, and knew it.

327 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:32:19am

re: #319 WrathofG-d

Ugh, I think the Chanukkah season and Winter is making everyone a bit emotional, and testy. (or I misread your post)

I never said the cop was correct in the amount of force he used (although now that you mention it, insofar that the bike rider was possibly evading arrest). I was just answering the question of "WHY" which was asked.

What's the matter, you can't type CHRISTMAS too!
/kidding

328 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:32:53am

re: #321 2by2

roller bladers in the park are the worst, and the one on both ends of the

specter

Rollerblading ghosts! Those are the worst.

Lunchtime.

329 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:32:56am
330 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:13am

re: #301 vapig

Nah - both cops zeroed right in on that one guy. Don't know why nothing was in the report, but he caught their attention in some way.

Let's assume for a moment as some up thread said the cyclist ignored another cop down street and failed to stop.

The only way to justify that cops actions under use of force guidelines is if the cyclist was attempting to run the cop down.

The video that is clearly not the case. It also explains why the cop falsified his report to say the cyclist was attempting to run him down.

331 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:18am

re: #318 albusteve

roach clip dangling on the handlebars?

Is that an offense in NY?

332 oh_dude  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:28am

Roadies suck.
Dude, Spandex is for girls.
He shaves his legs?
Why don't you get some rubber on those wheels.
Oh what pretty riding outfits. And they match!
Why do they always travel in packs?
1 mile in the dirt is equal to 2 miles on the pavement.
Do these guys really think that they're Lance Armstrong?

333 bulwrk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:31am

re: #255 Walter L. Newton

Yes , although that is the DA saying that and they have been known to play to public opinion.In any case I said I was not defending the cop, convicting people based on a 1 minute video is what the left loves too do.

334 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:47am
335 fredo malmstein  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:48am

This is not about the cyclist. This cop is a thug who needs to go to jail. Assaulting someone while in uniform is a disgrace to the city and the uniform. NYC cops are so much better than this jerkoff.

336 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:49am

re: #303 WriterMom

"First we kill all the lawyers..."

/

re: #312 Occasional Reader

Good thing I'm merely a male porn star.

For those unclear on the difference, one is paid to screw other people, while the other . . . um . . . well . . .

337 UberInfidel67  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:50am

What the hell just happened?!?!?! I clicked on the link to FOX and 20 windows started opening up. I hate when that happens!

338 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:33:50am

In San Francisco, Critical mass day is the last Friday of the month, every month. These people are basically provocateurs, the same way the woman in the zombie video said "Do it again!" to the cop in Denver. They are looking for an incident, to turn in to a political statement, and they frequently get them. I am not saying that the cop in the vid was right, but as for me, I just stay away. I don't need the murderous impulses. Critical Massholes, fuck 'em.

339 TheGrandMufti  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:34:03am

The video does not tell the whole story. Let's here the other side. What the cyclist was doing before he entered the frame that made him a target for a police take down?

As A NYC resident, I'm generally OK with the police taking these moonbat cyclists down a few notches. These narcissistic a$$holes obey no traffic laws, routinely block traffic just to be obnoxious, hit pedestrians, and overall diminish our quality of life here.

340 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:34:04am

re: #331 vapig

Is that an offense in NY?

not if I'm The Law...

341 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:34:27am

re: #263 rawmuse
Well

The attack broke off when I took my (huge) Colt 1911 out of the glove box and chambered a round. The attackers decided that they should find better targets for their political statements.

At that point, had I fired, I am the bad guy, according to the laws of the state of CA.

and justifiably so.

342 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:34:38am

re: #333 bulwrk

Yes , although that is the DA saying that and they have been known to play to public opinion.In any case I said I was not defending the cop, convicting people based on a 1 minute video is what the left loves too do.

Ok, so you are saying that the DA falsified their comment to the press?

343 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:34:43am
344 capitalist piglet  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:34:45am

re: #331 vapig

Is that an offense in NY?

Maybe not, but perhaps he was eating something with too much fat in it. Or having a can of non-diet cola. Or smoking a cigarette.

345 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:34:47am

re: #315 wrenchwench

The incident is old news, but the cop's plea in the case was today.

Oops, I mean yesterday.

346 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:35:19am

re: #330 jcm

Let's assume for a moment as some up thread said the cyclist ignored another cop down street and failed to stop.

The only way to justify that cops actions under use of force guidelines is if the cyclist was attempting to run the cop down.

The video that is clearly not the case. It also explains why the cop falsified his report to say the cyclist was attempting to run him down.

You are under the mistaken assumption that I was defending the cop. I was responding to the "random, short fuse" comment of another poster.

347 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:35:43am

re: #327 Walter L. Newton

What's the matter, you can't type CHRISTMAS too!
/kidding

I take no offense to your comment (as I assume none was intended) but since you bring it up.

This isn't the Xmas season to me. Its the Chanukkah season. Xmas doesn't take place in my life. Similar to how I ignore International Homosexual Day, whenever that might take place, I don't pay attention (as much as I can) to Xmas. Just another day as far as I'm concerned.

So you don't call it the Chanukkah season (as you don't celebrate Chanukkah) and I don't call it the Xmas season as I don't celebrate the Xmas event.

~clarification.

348 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:35:49am

re: #339 TheGrandMufti

The video does not tell the whole story. Let's here the other side. What the cyclist was doing before he entered the frame that made him a target for a police take down?

As A NYC resident, I'm generally OK with the police taking these moonbat cyclists down a few notches. These narcissistic a$$holes obey no traffic laws, routinely block traffic just to be obnoxious, hit pedestrians, and overall diminish our quality of life here.

I would imagine with a nic like the Grand Mufti," you would see no problem with what the cop did.

Fucking fascist. And I mean that.

349 jlibson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:09am

I am a commuting bicyclist, so I have sympathy for cyclists (and none for Critical Mass).

A lot of people consider this video as sufficient evidence of the Officer's guilt.

But I would remind you all about the video from The 2008 DNC convention protests. Remember there was a video of a police officer knocking this woman protester down. And if that was all that you saw then he looked like he assaulted her. But when (I think it was Zombie) showed the rest of the video, you saw that this woman had been violating police orders and provoking the cops.

Now...clearly this guy got clocked. And it looks entirely intentional.

But why did the cop show no interest in anyone else and then just decide to clock this guy in particular? Was he looking for him from a previous incident?

I expect that the full story has not yet been revealed.

350 bosforus  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:14am

re: #286 WrathofG-d

see the response/video to Charles above by "Beens21" that shoes that the cyclist had run a red light, and avoided arrest by another cop up street.

The response video and the original are not the same incident.

351 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:14am

re: #320 SasquatchOnSteroids

So, this Pakistani guy walks into a bar...

Paki sees that picture of laughing, unveiled woman and screams "INFIDELS! I KEEEL YOU!"

/not really kidding

352 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:19am

re: #330 jcm

Just in here, haven't read the thread.

I agree. Based upon the video, it was use of excessive force.

The cop shoved ... didn't grab and try to stop.

354 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:25am

re: #339 TheGrandMufti

So- you not only think the brutality in the video was justified, you want to see more of it?

355 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:28am

re: #339 TheGrandMufti

The video does not tell the whole story. Let's here the other side. What the cyclist was doing before he entered the frame that made him a target for a police take down?

As A NYC resident, I'm generally OK with the police taking these moonbat cyclists down a few notches. These narcissistic a$$holes obey no traffic laws, routinely block traffic just to be obnoxious, hit pedestrians, and overall diminish our quality of life here.

well to justify that abuse I want to see the tape of the biker waving his loaded Uzi...really how far can people stretch this thing...who gives a shit what happened up the street?

356 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:28am

re: #337 UberInfidel67

What the hell just happened?!?!?! I clicked on the link to FOX and 20 windows started opening up. I hate when that happens!

Time to change to another browser!

357 capitalist piglet  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:36:51am

re: #339 TheGrandMufti

The video does not tell the whole story. Let's here the other side. What the cyclist was doing before he entered the frame that made him a target for a police take down?

As A NYC resident, I'm generally OK with the police taking these moonbat cyclists down a few notches. These narcissistic a$$holes obey no traffic laws, routinely block traffic just to be obnoxious, hit pedestrians, and overall diminish our quality of life here.

I've been wondering that too. Maybe the guy hit somebody up the street. It's hard to imagine why a cop would single a guy out like that, but it seems unlikely that it was completely random.

358 poohrat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:06am

The cop is sunk but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy watching a hippie get the poop knocked out of him.

359 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:11am

re: #343 Iron Fist

When I'm on my bike I'm almost paranoid.

A wise policy.

As I like to say: On a motorcycle, you are the airbag.

360 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:19am

re: #340 albusteve

not if I'm The Law...

Upding for the obscure Judge Dredd reference

361 AKAK  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:24am

I think even if the cop said something, it was fairly loud & distracting that it would require the motion of him raising his hand to signal stop.

362 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:37am

re: #356 gmsc

Time to change to another browser!

IE is a security threat at the moment.

/Or in my world, daily.

363 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:41am

Now, lunch... tawk amungst yahselves.

364 jorline  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:45am

Some videos damn the guilty and others exonerate the Innocent, as in zombie's video in Denver of the Code Pinker claiming police brutality.

365 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:37:59am

One thing to consider, this cop was only 23 years old, and young men have less self control than older men, and are more prone to resort to violence when provoked. The military relies on older NCOs to keep them from getting out of hand in combat and committing atrocities. I don't think this should end the kid's career.

366 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:38:10am
367 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:38:13am

re: #364 jorline

Some videos damn the guilty and others exonerate the Innocent, as in zombie's video in Denver of the Code Pinker claiming police brutality.

I was just thinking of that.

368 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:38:25am

re: #350 bosforus

Oh. Then call me silly.
What makes you believe its not the same incident?

369 ExCamelJockey  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:38:42am

Did anyone notice that it looks like another bicyclist ran off with the battered guys bicycle at the end of that video?

370 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:38:53am

re: #362 Sharmuta

IE is a security threat at the moment.

/Or in my world, daily.

FYI: ... The update is NOW available on Microsoft Update. Just downloaded it. Restart is req'd.

371 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:38:53am

re: #323 davesax

If you really are doing that, stop. If you get caught, you'll really catch it. That sort of premeditated action will get you prison time.

372 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:38:59am

re: #347 WrathofG-d

I take no offense to your comment (as I assume none was intended) but since you bring it up.

This isn't the Xmas season to me. Its the Chanukkah season. Xmas doesn't take place in my life. Similar to how I ignore International Homosexual Day, whenever that might take place, I don't pay attention (as much as I can) to Xmas. Just another day as far as I'm concerned.

So you don't call it the Chanukkah season (as you don't celebrate Chanukkah) and I don't call it the Xmas season as I don't celebrate the Xmas event.

~clarification.

Yes, I was having fun with you. But, how do you know that I don't celebrate the Chanukkah season?

I'm not Jewish, and no, I don't suspect that I make 8 days of gathering, but I do have a lot of invites and I do manage to make one or two of them.

You don't know mw well enough, but I am the "token goy" here in the Golden area. And three of my play deals directly with Jewish issues.

I am very much (for a gentile) in touch with the season.

373 yma o hyd  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:39:03am

re: #293 Walter L. Newton

It still doesn't matter. The force that the cop used was not right. And if he was SO right in what he did, then why did he falsify the report?
He knew he had jumped the shark. And that's the whole point.

It is indeed.
I don't care how much the LEO felt provoked, in such a situation I expect them to keep their cool. He didn't - that alone makes him a dubious prospect for this job.

But the main point is indeed that he falsified his report.
This means he knew that what he did would not stand up to scrutiny, he knew he did wrong.
I'm sorry, he's got no place in any police force.

Mind - I question the judgement of his superiour officers, a) for having him put in such a situation, and b) for not telling him that report falsification means his carrer is over.

374 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:39:18am

re: #361 AKAK

I think even if the cop said something, it was fairly loud & distracting that it would require the motion of him raising his hand to signal stop.

The guy didn't stop for the stop light, and ran away from the cop trying to arrest him. What makes you think the cyclist would stop for a hand signal?

375 jorline  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:39:20am

re: #367 Sharmuta

I was just thinking of that.

The sword cuts both ways.

376 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:39:38am

re: #192 MandyManners

I won't argue the level of charges but, shouldn't a cop know what kind of damage a cyclist can incur when thrown from his bike onto asphalt/concrete? Bikes aren't UFO's.

A cop should know, especially since they are supposed to see bicycles as vehicles and treat them/enforce laws against them as such. But the sad thing is that you can bet that the typical cop does not know what harm it can do. And when it comes to murder, knowledge of intended harm is pretty fundamental to establishing murder. Add to that the fact that cops do have a right to use deadly force when you and I cannot.

Irony here is that we hear all of the time from cops that "ignorance of the law is no excuse" while ignorance of the harm of your actions can be an excuse.

Again, my low opinion of the cop is the basis of my assumption (and it is only an assumption) that he had no idea that he was using deadly force.

377 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:39:46am

re: #365 maddogg

He falsified his report. That's a problem. A big one. Next thing you know- he'll move to Chicago and run for office.

378 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:40:04am

re: #370 pre-Boomer Marine brat

FYI: ... The update is NOW available on Microsoft Update. Just downloaded it. Restart is req'd.

I wouldn't use IE if you paid me.

379 Learned Mother of Zion  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:40:20am

re: #281 WriterMom

OT: Chinese Spam/Virus whatever alert.

I just got an e-mail that had some details in it (specific to my work and workplace) that made me think that it was a legitimate business e-mail regarding something to do with China. It looked suspicious so I tried to call the telephone number in the body-it was out of service-anyway, I ran my anti-virus software and it was something nasty.

Anyone else get anything similar today? And no-it wasn't a ENHANCE YOUR ORGAN or INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY e-mail...

I get zillions of spam emails every day from "Mary Coyen" for outsourcing web design, CAD service, translations, what have you. No matter how many filters I set up, "Mary" always slips through. But she always ends up in the junk bucket.

380 bosforus  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:40:24am

re: #368 WrathofG-d

Oh. Then call me silly.
What makes you believe its not the same incident?

Response: Right at a corner, cyclist wearing black
Original: Appears to be in the middle of the block, cyclist wearing white
They certainly do look like the same incident though. I had to watch it a few times.

381 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:40:50am

re: #378 Sharmuta

I wouldn't use IE if you paid me.

Yeah. That was a general generic FYI to all concerned.

382 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:40:56am
383 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:41:09am

re: #339 TheGrandMufti

19 comments since 2007 and a nic like that, most interesting.

Sockie?

384 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:41:19am

re: #377 Sharmuta

He falsified his report. That's a problem. A big one. Next thing you know- he'll move to Chicago and run for office.

If he really did falsify his report, then that will be what sinks him.

385 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:41:20am

re: #335 fredo malmstein

This is not about the cyclist. This cop is a thug who needs to go to jail. Assaulting someone while in uniform is a disgrace to the city and the uniform. NYC cops are so much better than this jerkoff.

Once again. The video does NOT tell the whole story. Just a 30 second time frame. If the LEO is found guilty so be it. But don't hang him until them. They are doing a thankless job and get hit from all sides. 98% are good people who don't know who are the bad guys. Let the courts decide and don't make judgement on a 30 second video clip. We are better than that here.

386 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:41:35am

re: #339 TheGrandMufti

The video does not tell the whole story. Let's here the other side. What the cyclist was doing before he entered the frame that made him a target for a police take down?

As A NYC resident, I'm generally OK with the police taking these moonbat cyclists down a few notches. These narcissistic a$$holes obey no traffic laws, routinely block traffic just to be obnoxious, hit pedestrians, and overall diminish our quality of life here.

One or two cops standing in the street trying to stop a hundred cyclist who will not obey a verbal order are powerless.

That's the way it is.

Critical Massholes are annoying, obnoxious, vile, disgusting. But none of those things rises to an officer using force.

Blocking traffic, demonstrating without a permit are illegal. But still do not justify use of that level of force.

PERIOD FULL STOP!

IF the Massholes are running people down, causing damage etc... the rules change. But the Massholes are smarter than that.

The cops have one option, herd them down a street with an end blocked off, and close the door behind them. Corral the Massholes, and start effecting arrests. If a Massholes resists, then a cop is justified in face planting them. But not before.

387 Killian Bundy  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:41:59am

Lunch break in the continuing saga of the Franken election stealing attempt. There were three 3-2 decisions on contested ballots and MN SOS Mark "I Work For ACORN" Ritchie broke all three ties in favor of Coleman.

/I'm impress

388 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:42:14am

re: #365 maddogg

One thing to consider, this cop was only 23 years old, and young men have less self control than older men, and are more prone to resort to violence when provoked. The military relies on older NCOs to keep them from getting out of hand in combat and committing atrocities. I don't think this should end the kid's career.

23? I hate to say it, but that explains alot. Lack of experience probably turned what he thought was a check into a heavy handed assault. It could also explain his perception that the bicyclist veered into him in his report.

389 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:42:23am

re: #384 maddogg

If he really did falsify his report, then that will be what sinks him.

Or launches his political career. Really- he should move to Chicago- he'll fit right in.

390 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:42:44am

re: #346 vapig

You are under the mistaken assumption that I was defending the cop. I was responding to the "random, short fuse" comment of another poster.

Sorry, I was more adding to your comment, than arguing.

Not clear on my part!

*don't push me to the curb bro*
;-P

391 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:42:47am

re: #377 Sharmuta

He falsified his report. That's a problem. A big one. Next thing you know- he'll move to Chicago and run for office.

re: #384 maddogg

If he really did falsify his report, then that will be what sinks him will qualify him for public office in Chicago.

FTFY

392 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:42:56am
393 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:43:08am
394 captain amercia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:43:29am

What you saw on the video is a police officer making an arrest by force. He didn't mace the suspect. He didn't hit him with his baton or shoot him. He stopped the guy on a speeding bike and arrested him for some reason. The question is what information or reason did he have to take the guy into custody? Did (as I believe) something happen off camera to give this officer a reason to apprehend THIS PARTICULAR cyclist as opposed to the dozens of others that rode by unmolested? I would say most likely, as this officer zeroed in on this particular guy.

How many of us have ever attempted to subdue anyone? Honestly? Until you physically try to restrain or otherwise subdue someone who resists then you really don't have any idea what it takes without getting hurt yourself. Police officers have NO OBLIGATION to get hurt in the performance of their duties. I know I wouldn't.

How many of us have ever watched someone be arrested who didn't want to cooperate? It's not something you see everyday. A guy speeding by on a bicycle at thirty miles an hour who fails to yield can be a tricky target to stop without getting hurt in the process. My guess is that a cop somewhere up the line and off camera tried to stop this jerk and was unsuccessful. This cop made sure he didn't slip by and did it without injuring himself. Job well done.

Either that or he just felt like blasting a environmental, tree hugging whack job bicyclist. Sucks to be that guy.
Either way he gets my vote for cop of the month!

395 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:43:31am

re: #387 Killian Bundy

Lunch break in the continuing saga of the Franken election stealing attempt. There were three 3-2 decisions on contested ballots and MN SOS Mark "I Work For ACORN" Ritchie broke all three ties in favor of Coleman.

/I'm impress

As am I. Maybe Ritchie is actually an honest official. He's from MN after all, not IL.

396 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:43:42am

re: #393 davesax

You're a prick.

397 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:43:44am

re: #388 vapig

23? I hate to say it, but that explains alot. Lack of experience probably turned what he thought was a check into a heavy handed assault. It could also explain his perception that the bicyclist veered into him in his report.

I think it all comes down to the fact that he was pissed. Then reacted in anger. Then later, got scared and maybe lied on his report, compounding the error.

398 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:44:11am

From the article linked at the top of the page:

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said, "It's certainly sad and disappointing to see any officer indicted, particularly one who had only been out of the Police Academy three weeks."
399 docremulac  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:44:23am

I'm really not sure why there's confusion about this incident or the re-occuring incidents of assault on metropolitan areas committed by the Critical-massholes.

1- The cop committed assault.

2- Critical mass organizers should be arrested and tried under RICO

3- Critical mass riders who block traffic should be ticketed. Safely block a whole group of them, tell them they are being detained for traffic violation and to try to leave is a crime then ticket each and every one of them. If they don't have ID, arrest them.

These are traffic violations so the cops should treat them as such. If the police stand in front of a bunch of bikes and signal them to stop (that's not what happened here) then they have to stop. If they continue riding and try to get away, it's not a traffic violation any more and it can and should be treated as such.

First offense should be one fine, second an increased fine and third offense you loose your right to ride a bike on the city streets for a couple of years as well as having your bike taken away to defer expenses incurred keeping the little brats from holding up real people on the way to their jobs.

I would give fair warning before enacting this. Radio adds, fliers posted and emails and regular mails sent out to anybody they might have a list for saying that no more blocking of traffic by bikes is going to be allowed. Clearly spell out that the above steps will be taken to minimize collateral damage to these little twerps.

Am I insane to think this is really obvious on both counts?

400 experiencedtraveller  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:44:28am

The big story is rising crime in NYC and looming budget cuts.

401 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:44:32am

West,

Good to see you.

I'm not fantisizing. I'm writing this from prison.

402 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:44:32am
403 eschew_obfuscation  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:44:33am

re: #343 Iron Fist

See, I don't get any of that shit. When I'm on my bike I'm almost paranoid. I maintain good following distances (my bike won't stop on a dime), and try to watch everything. I'm very cognizant of the fact that my little helmet and riding leathers aren't going to make that much difference if I smack into someone at 55MPH.

You can call me a wimp, but I've never had my bike above 80 and probably never will. And I don't play chicken with cops. Ever.

Yeah, well...you've got that cool jacket with the Lizard patch to keep you save...it's sort of like Kryptonite for bikers ;-)

404 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:44:49am

re: #389 Sharmuta

re: #391 gmsc

I've said it before, and I'll say it again - you're too quick. Of course, being only 3 apples probably helps.

405 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:45:20am

re: #390 jcm

Sorry, I was more adding to your comment, than arguing.

Not clear on my part!

*don't push me to the curb bro*
;-P

Quite all right and thank you for the clarification. I know you're a good egg ;^}

406 bulwrk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:45:21am

re: #342 Walter L. Newton

Are you trying to be combative today? my bad I know there has never been a case in a major metropolitan city where the DA has made a false statement or made law enforcement the sacrificial lamb on the alter of public opinion.

407 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:45:33am

re: #379 Alouette

I get zillions of spam emails every day from "Mary Coyen" for outsourcing web design, CAD service, translations, what have you. No matter how many filters I set up, "Mary" always slips through. But she always ends up in the junk bucket.

I wonder why the spammers think I will purchase something if they manage to bypass all my filters and blocks? If I build a large castle with high walls and a wide moat and put crocodiles in the moat, put archers on the wall and booby traps in the hallways in order to keep out salesmen; and if a salesman managed to get through, why in the world would he think I would be in a hurry to buy anything from him?

408 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:45:33am
409 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:45:45am
410 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:46:34am
411 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:46:46am

re: #394 captain amercia

Did you read the article in the link that Charles posted?

412 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:46:49am

In case anyone is interested, up thread Lincolntf leaves a message as if he is bothered by what this cop did, but if you check a lot of the up dings on comments that are "kill the hippy" sort of comments, Lincolntf is up dinging them all.

He really is a troll and I say GAZE for now on.

Talk among yourselves.

413 Sizzlack  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:47:11am

I bike around NYC every chance I get in nice weather, and I am one of those people who is not in a rush, I stop at red lights, I yield for pedestrians and I dont f*** around with oncoming traffic. There are MANY piece of crap cyclists here that almost kill me and others when we cross the street, and I hate them but I really hope this piece of junk 'cop' does time. This video makes me cringe, between the fact you can see the bike rider lean to move away from the cop and the cop hasten his steps to make sure he nails the guy. Terrible.

414 nyc redneck  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:47:14am

are there guidelines for properly stopping someone on a speeding bicycle?
should he have just tried to grab him?
gotten in front of the bicycle?
stuck his baton in the spokes?

415 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:47:17am

Some of you people are disgusting. Hope your proud of justifying tactics like this. If this was a protest of right wingers getting beat up by 0bama thugs, I know you'd being singing a different tune.

Hypocrites.

416 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:47:21am

re: #357 capitalist piglet

I've been wondering that too. Maybe the guy hit somebody up the street. It's hard to imagine why a cop would single a guy out like that, but it seems unlikely that it was completely random.

Why didn't the other cop maneuver into a position in which to help stop the cyclist?

417 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:47:25am

Hi buzz:

Thanks for the response.

I'm not trying to be anything.

And I don't know who Sam Kinison is.

418 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:47:27am
419 keyword  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:47:41am

It is my contention that the bicyclist had been around the block before, and had said some very mean things to the officer - and spit on him.

420 lostlakehiker  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:48:06am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

I don't care. Those cyclists are obnoxious and hostile. Pounding them is a public service.

Even if it were, that would be a job for civilians. Sworn officers of the law are way off the reservation when they switch over to volunteer manners-teachers.

Moving to the more general tone of the threads, this collision had no potential for life-threatening injury. The cyclist was going maybe 8mph. The cop hit him but not at a run. Broken elbow or collarbone, mild concussion at the outside. Most likely some scrapes and bruises and a ruined wheel is all that came of it.

My experience has been that motorists are mostly decent enough. A few will honk just to see you start. A few will cut things uncomfortably close. But the rider has a share of the responsibility here: big trucks are big. The smart rider finds a spot off the road rather than stand his ground and in effect demand that the truck move over into the other lane or risk a close shave or worse. All in all, from what I see, motorists are ruder to each other than they are to cyclists.

To my fellow cyclists, what is the logic of antagonizing everybody? The natural way of things would be that motorists would appreciate us because our net effect is to diminish road congestion. We have a smaller traffic footprint than we would if we took a car instead. When we get where we're going, we don't take a parking place. We don't bid up the price of gasoline, or make motorists wait in line at the pump.

Cops and us? We provide a steady stream of amusement for them, perhaps, and an occasional source of revenue. We're easy marks for tickets: we sometimes run stop signs, we change lanes without observing all the niceties, that sort of thing. But we're no threat, and the tickets are a lot less serious. No amount of bicycle tickets will cost you your drivers license, or raise your motorist insurance rate. [This isn't legal advice; your state may be different!]

Citizens: we must all hang together, or we shall assuredly hang separately.

421 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:48:11am

re: #393 davesax
Uh, y'all forgot your sarc tag there.

422 bosforus  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:48:31am

re: #401 davesax

I'm writing this from prison.

WTF?

423 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:00am

re: #412 Walter L. Newton

In case anyone is interested, up thread Lincolntf leaves a message as if he is bothered by what this cop did, but if you check a lot of the up dings on comments that are "kill the hippy" sort of comments, Lincolntf is up dinging them all.

He really is a troll and I say GAZE for now on.

Talk among yourselves.

I agree, Walter.

424 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:10am
425 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:12am
426 gman  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:18am

Just a couple of observations:

The man on the bike could have also easily been killed by the sign post that he was nearly pushed into.

Also, when the man on the bike is riding towards the cop, I see an object projecting outwards on his right side (could be his arm, but I don't think so)

427 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:24am

re: #412 Walter L. Newton

In case anyone is interested, up thread Lincolntf leaves a message as if he is bothered by what this cop did, but if you check a lot of the up dings on comments that are "kill the hippy" sort of comments, Lincolntf is up dinging them all.

He really is a troll and I say GAZE for now on.

Talk among yourselves.

I had thought that initially myself, after some of the things he posted on ID threads. Lic, you need to explain yourself here.

428 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:32am

re: #393 davesax

Amazing you just wrote that. You, sir, are an asshole of a fairly high caliber.

429 SasquatchOnSteroids  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:40am

Drug abuse rampant among Arab youths

The gap ranges between 4-12%. Jewish youths are afraid of having a criminal record, but for an Arab youth this does not pose a threat," said Walid Hadad, the IADAF's inspector in the Arab sector. He spoke at a convention held by the foundation.
430 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:54am

re: #394 captain amercia

What you saw on the video is a police officer making an arrest by force. He didn't mace the suspect. He didn't hit him with his baton or shoot him. He stopped the guy on a speeding bike and arrested him for some reason. The question is what information or reason did he have to take the guy into custody? Did (as I believe) something happen off camera to give this officer a reason to apprehend THIS PARTICULAR cyclist as opposed to the dozens of others that rode by unmolested? I would say most likely, as this officer zeroed in on this particular guy.

How many of us have ever attempted to subdue anyone? Honestly? Until you physically try to restrain or otherwise subdue someone who resists then you really don't have any idea what it takes without getting hurt yourself. Police officers have NO OBLIGATION to get hurt in the performance of their duties. I know I wouldn't.

How many of us have ever watched someone be arrested who didn't want to cooperate? It's not something you see everyday. A guy speeding by on a bicycle at thirty miles an hour who fails to yield can be a tricky target to stop without getting hurt in the process. My guess is that a cop somewhere up the line and off camera tried to stop this jerk and was unsuccessful. This cop made sure he didn't slip by and did it without injuring himself. Job well done.

Either that or he just felt like blasting a environmental, tree hugging whack job bicyclist. Sucks to be that guy.
Either way he gets my vote for cop of the month!

Up dinged you, but for last sentence. Let the courts decide. Period.

431 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:49:58am

Dark Falkon,

You said, Unless you meant to include a /sarc tag, I'm leaning towards a GAZE for you.

Please do.

If you look at the LGF history, I started the GAZE action about four years ago.

I'm glad to see it's still used, even though I rarely post hear anymore.

Thanks for your support.

432 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:50:10am

re: #415 Sharmuta

Some of you people are disgusting. Hope your proud of justifying tactics like this. If this was a protest of right wingers getting beat up by 0bama thugs, I know you'd being singing a different tune.

Hypocrites.

Please, hypocrite is the ancient Greek word for actor. It has taken on a negative meaning over the centuries. I would like to use a different word...

FASCIST.

433 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:50:16am

re: #419 keyword

It is my contention that the bicyclist had been around the block before, and had said some very mean things to the officer - and spit on him.

Cops are trained about such situations. Does not excuse the cop.

434 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:50:23am

Am I the only one to report No. 393?

435 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:50:25am

re: #401 davesax
From prison? Holy Shit Dave - what the hell did you do to wind up in prison?

436 JohnnyReb  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:50:35am

re: #366 Iron Fist

Yeah, but you can get arrested for pulling a gun. John Law don't have a sense of humor about it one bit.

Generally the statment "I was afraid for my life" works well in those situations if yo uget charged. At least it did for my friend.

437 mattm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:50:44am

re: #28 Ford_Prefect

Yes, but why? Did the cyclist do something we didn't see?

I am waiting for all the facts. If this is a CM video i'm sure it was edited to make the cop look bad.

438 yma o hyd  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:50:58am

re: #419 keyword

It is my contention that the bicyclist had been around the block before, and had said some very mean things to the officer - and spit on him.

FFS - that no excuse for what the cop did, and if this had indeed been the case - why did he falsify his report?

439 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:51:30am

I also reported No. 323, as well as my post in which I bone-headedly reposted that one.

Anyone else?

440 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:51:30am

Wow, things have gotten so SERIOUS in here since I last posted on these threads.

You guys are no fun.

441 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:51:31am

re: #372 Walter L. Newton

Fair enough. You are correct. I assumed that you weren't Jewish (from other comments you have made) and thus assumed that you wouldn't consider this part of the year the Chanukkah season. If you do, great!

none of the above however changes the core aspect of my post however.

Happy Whatever Season to you :)

442 Pietr  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:51:57am

re: #215 vapig

Start walking with a cane, that's my suggestion. When an idiot starts at you like that, sidestep and thrust thru whichever wheel you can reach-and let go immediately, so as not to break your wrist. You can always say it was an accident, but that bike will stop-and be unusable until fixed. (WARNING: doing this several times will probably raise suspicions that it wasn't an accident.)
/white smoke.

443 Kragar  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:00am

re: #414 nyc redneck

are there guidelines for properly stopping someone on a speeding bicycle?
should he have just tried to grab him?
gotten in front of the bicycle?
stuck his baton in the spokes?

General guidelines are you attempt to gain control of a person, thru grabbing and applying one of a variety of submission holds. You do not hit, strike or shove unless the situation warrants it and you do not initiate that behavior, you respond with it. Its why LE have escalation of force training to teach what is appropriate. If he were trying to arrest the guy, the officer could have done more to get in front of him, forcing him to at least slow, then he and his partner could grab the guy. This officer made no attempt to do that.

444 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:04am

re: #438 yma o hyd

FFS - that no excuse for what the cop did, and if this had indeed been the case - why did he falsify his report?

He was looking for a better job, and he figured this would get him a position in the 0bama administration.


///

445 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:09am

re: #431 davesax

Dark Falkon,

You said, Unless you meant to include a /sarc tag, I'm leaning towards a GAZE for you.

Please do.

If you look at the LGF history, I started the GAZE action about four years ago.

I'm glad to see it's still used, even though I rarely post hear anymore.

Thanks for your support.

Oh, really?

GAZE - To glare with silent disapproval at a troll who has intentionally attempted to derail a topic. A sign of non-acknowledgment of a particularly offensive or inflammatory post, and a sign to other commenters not to "feed the troll" (pay attention to a disruptive commenter). Usually written all capitals.
[First documented use: sub_version 4/17/2003 03:04PM]
446 UberInfidel67  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:10am

re: #362 SharmutaI am up to date. It is impossible to close the windows to because for each one you close 5 more open up. LOL

447 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:12am
448 docremulac  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:18am

Of course if there's something that happened off the screen like the biker hit somebody or something, that changes things, but I don't see that the cop gestured for the guy to stop before tackling him as would have been appropriate if he had cause to make an arrest.

449 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:26am

Real:

Yes, Prison.

It's called a dayjob :-)

450 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:27am
451 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:52:48am

re: #419 keyword

It is my contention that the bicyclist had been around the block before, and had said some very mean things to the officer - and spit on him.

I am trying to defend the LEO and you come up with this SHIT. Fuck you and prove it. The video shows nothing of that.

452 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:53:03am

re: #434 MandyManners

Am I the only one to report No. 393?

No.

453 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:53:16am

re: #445 jcm

Fact checkin' asses- that's what we do. Good job and an increase of karma for you.

454 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:53:16am

re: #380 bosforus

Response: Right at a corner, cyclist wearing black
Original: Appears to be in the middle of the block, cyclist wearing white
They certainly do look like the same incident though. I had to watch it a few times.


Then I take my "great contribution to this conversation" statement given to ___21 and give it to you.

I was wrong!

Thank you for clearing that up.

455 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:53:18am

re: #450 buzzsawmonkey

I think he is referring to Hyperbolic Mind Prison.

He's imprisoned in the Time Cube?

456 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:53:32am

re: #401 davesax

West,

Good to see you.

I'm not fantisizing. I'm writing this from prison.

Three hots and a cot, plus high-speed connection.

457 bosforus  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:53:51am

re: #449 davesax

Real:

Yes, Prison.

It's called a dayjob :-)

Well aren't you clever? You love that joke don't you?

458 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:53:59am

re: #439 MandyManners

I also reported No. 323, as well as my post in which I bone-headedly reposted that one.

Anyone else?

Yes, I just did as well. WTF does "davesax" think he is? What an asshole.

459 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:54:07am

re: #434 MandyManners

Am I the only one to report No. 393?

I did.

460 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:54:22am

re: #425 MandyManners

What the fuck is your problem? How smug will you feel if/when you kill someone? Do you throw things such as tire-irons at speeding motorists?

Don't give this moron any ideas!

461 yma o hyd  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:54:38am

re: #444 gmsc

He was looking for a better job, and he figured this would get him a position in the 0bama administration.


///

Heh.
I wonder if it'll work ...

462 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:55:15am

re: #449 davesax
Oh jeez man, don't even KID about that - I remember you and really enjoyed talking with you in person - PLEASE don't fuck around like that!

463 Boxy_brown  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:55:20am

It still amazes me when I see that some people don't think that police can do any wrong simply because they are police.

464 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:55:24am

re: #431 davesax

Dark Falkon,

You said, Unless you meant to include a /sarc tag, I'm leaning towards a GAZE for you.

Please do.

If you look at the LGF history, I started the GAZE action about four years ago.

I'm glad to see it's still used, even though I rarely post hear anymore.

Thanks for your support.

Really/ Then why is the first recorded use of it in 2003 when you didn't join until 2004?

465 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:55:25am

re: #434 MandyManners

Am I the only one to report No. 393?

I did

466 Haverwilde  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:55:33am

re: #434 MandyManners

Am I the only one to report No. 393?

Are you sure you want to do that? It just seemed like hyperbolic humor.

467 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:55:33am

JCM:

Sorry, your link is wrong.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

" What’s GAZE stand for?
A. It doesn’t stand for anything, it’s just “gaze” written in upper-case. On the LGF Prayer thread (another very funny one), poster davesax suggested using it to acknowledge trolls without feeding them (see also this post by Geepers)."

468 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:55:35am

re: #440 davesax

Wow, things have gotten so SERIOUS in here since I last posted on these threads.

You guys are no fun.

You think knocking over a person on a bicycle is fun? You think potentially killing the guy is fun?

Be gone, troll.

469 nyc redneck  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:56:09am

re: #443 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

General guidelines are you attempt to gain control of a person, thru grabbing and applying one of a variety of submission holds. You do not hit, strike or shove unless the situation warrants it and you do not initiate that behavior, you respond with it. Its why LE have escalation of force training to teach what is appropriate. If he were trying to arrest the guy, the officer could have done more to get in front of him, forcing him to at least slow, then he and his partner could grab the guy. This officer made no attempt to do that.

getting in front of a bicycle going that fast would be dangerous for the cop.
i'm thinking he could have tried to grab him rather than shove him.
i'm sure this will be argued at his trial.

470 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:56:14am

re: #458 Honorary Yooper

Yes, I just did as well. WTF does "davesax" think he is? What an asshole.

Well "Captain America" thinks he's cool. He up dinged the comment.

471 gman  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:56:24am

re: #393 davesax

Don't bring your filth in here Moby.

472 jwb7605  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:56:38am

re: #455 gmsc

He's imprisoned in the Time Cube?

That is the most screwed up link I have had the misfortune to click.
I'll not be lurking for several hours ... gotta go get some brain bleach.

473 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:56:41am

Falcon:

I was posting on this place before there was a sign up.

In 2002.

While you were still wearing...whatever it is you like to wear.

474 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:57:22am
475 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:57:22am

re: #450 buzzsawmonkey
Yeah, I got that buzz. But I've met davesax and "broken bread" with him at a NYC meetup (small one) and he is - or was - a really nice guy, and a hardworking, taxpaying honest guy and I can't appreciate the humor of his "in prison" post. Sorry.

476 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:57:25am

To all of you defending/applauding the cop, I hope Santa gives you a few lumps of coal.

477 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:57:41am

re: #463 Boxy_brown

It still amazes me when I see that some people don't think that police can do any wrong simply because they are police.

I support our cops.

But you have to call foul, when a foul has been made.

When the police can do no wrong. It's called a Police State.

478 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:58:06am

re: #466 Haverwilde

Are you sure you want to do that? It just seemed like hyperbolic humor.

Sorry, I'm quite familiar with conic sections, and I didn't get the humor.

479 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:58:19am

re: #473 davesax

So fucking what if you were here before registration started, you're still a prick.

480 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:58:51am
481 davinvalkri  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:59:25am

Cue the statements about police brutality and "endemic in the department" in three...
And as for the cop, he needs to learn what Rather did back in 2004:
YOU CAN'T HIDE FROM THE INTERWEBS, B***!

482 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:59:35am

re: #384 maddogg

If he really did falsify his report, then that will be what sinks him.

Seriously. Don't know why people can't just fess up and take the punishment, which is usually one hell of a lot less when one in contrite.

This is what usually sinks politicians too.

483 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:59:37am
484 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:59:43am
485 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:59:45am
486 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 10:59:49am

Ow, Sharmuta.

You're hurting me.

Stop.

487 Captain Amercia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:00:07am

As a matter of fact BOTH cops were looking DIRECTLY at this ONE cyclist as I have stated while dozens of other's passed by unmolested.
Again WHY? What brought their attention to THIS INDIVIDUAL? Obviously he did something.
Now how would you have have stopped a speeding bike without getting your leg, arm, back broken or lacerated and probably inflicting that much trauma on the bicyclist anyway? What page is that on in the police training manual? I can tell you it isn't there. That way everyone gets to Monday morning quarterback the police.

Lets hear all the magic bullet answers.
I got one: Yell "HALT! in the name of the law". Said with arm outstretched and palm facing the oncoming bike with hand turned upward!
The only thing missing are the interviews telling us all what a good boy he was. Please.

488 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:00:15am

re: #480 ploome hineni

surprised both of you do not recgnize sarcasm

;lol

Odd concept of sarcasm there, Ploome. Plus, with that, there's no /sarc tag.

489 Onslow  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:00:17am
490 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:00:25am

re: #472 jwb7605

That is the most screwed up link I have had the misfortune to click.
I'll not be lurking for several hours ... gotta go get some brain bleach.

Remember: Without Financial Support I May shut Down!

That would be a d*mn shame, wouldn't it?

491 vxbush  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:00:26am

re: #478 gmsc

Sorry, I'm quite familiar with conic sections, and I didn't get the humor.

I think you're being elliptical.

492 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:00:38am

re: #467 davesax

JCM:

Sorry, your link is wrong.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

" What’s GAZE stand for?
A. It doesn’t stand for anything, it’s just “gaze” written in upper-case. On the LGF Prayer thread (another very funny one), poster davesax suggested using it to acknowledge trolls without feeding them (see also this post by Geepers)."

That I will have to concede.
The dictionary should be updated.

493 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:00:42am

re: #486 davesax

How's this for irony? GAZE

494 realwest  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:01:01am

OK, it's been interesting but I gotta go eat some lunch, I hope you all have a good day and that I get the chance to see you all down the road.

495 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:01:20am

re: #485 buzzsawmonkey

I'm just an old chunk of coal--but I'm gonna be a diamond some day.

I am a little acorn,
that fact is plain to see.
But remember that the mighty oak
was once a nut like me!

496 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:01:22am

re: #487 Captain Amercia

Did you read the article?

497 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:01:35am

Man did everyone wake up on the wrong side this morning? Who the the trolls out today?Who Let the Dogs out?

498 LGoPs  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:01:42am

re: #336 gmsc

For those unclear on the difference, one is paid to screw other people, while the other . . . um . . . well . . .

You all of course know the difference between a lawyer and a flounder.
One is a bottom dwelling, garbage eating scavenger and the other is a fish.

Oldie but a goodie...

499 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:01am

re: #414 nyc redneck

are there guidelines for properly stopping someone on a speeding bicycle?
should he have just tried to grab him?
gotten in front of the bicycle?
stuck his baton in the spokes?


stuck his baton in the spokes? Wow, that would have been much harsher! I did that to a bully when I was in 6th grade and it slap messed him up. Never had any more problems with him though.

500 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:05am
501 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:12am
502 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:13am

re: #416 MandyManners

Why didn't the other cop maneuver into a position in which to help stop the cyclist?

He looked to be heading in a support mode. To me, they both seemed intent on the same individual while ignoring everybody else.

I don't want to excuse the guy, but someone mentioned he was only 23. I'm thinking inexperience played a large role in this and he's lucky his actions didn't cause serious injury to this guy. Hopefully he learns his lesson from this and takes his punishment like a man.

503 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:21am

re: #473 davesax

Falcon:

I was posting on this place before there was a sign up.

In 2002.

While you were still wearing...whatever it is you like to wear.

You don't take criticism well, do you? I criticized you for something nasty you said, and you transmogrified my screen name to resemble that UN buffoon Falk. What gives?

504 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:28am

re: #484 ploome hineni

why?

Over the top, and without a sarc tag.
Maybe it was meant as sarc, but it shouldn't stand without a clear label.

505 Haverwilde  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:32am

re: #478 gmsc

Sorry, I'm quite familiar with conic sections, and I didn't get the humor.


Hyperbolic as the adjective form of hyperbole, as in to exaggerate, go to the extreme. And in this case make the opposite point of what is being said. Lighten up a bit. The world is not about to end. Except maybe financially.

506 eschew_obfuscation  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:02:48am

I seriously question these suggestions that one can put a cane through a rider's spokes or throw ball bearings in front of a rider who is offensive.

The times I've been passed by a rider, a) I didn't know he was there until he was past me and b) wouldn't have known he would be offensive to me until he hit me or was long gone. Riders move too fast for a pedestrian to take such actions unless the pedestrian plans the action in advance and sees the rider coming and knows the rider will be offensive. That seems like a pretty high bar to hurdle.

507 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:03:04am

Lunch today is Salisbury Steak. I swear it tastes EXACTLY like the meat loaf.

508 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:03:21am

re: #480 ploome hineni

surprised both of you do not recgnize sarcasm

;lol

It didn't use the sarcasm tag. You know why we use it here.

509 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:03:45am

Thanks, JCM.

It should be updated.

Obviously, the way I worded my first post is so over the top. I would never throw ball bearings at a cylclist, or wish police brutality on anybody.

But, ask any working person in NYC what it's like to cross the streets in this city, especially around 34th and 42nd. I've been hit by bikers three times.

Last month, I watched a biker run into a woman, and ride away.

Happens all the time.

So, screw the cops. And the bikers.

That's what I say.

510 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:03:49am

re: #480 ploome hineni

surprised both of you do not recgnize sarcasm

;lol

If this were a frequent poster whose style we recognized, I'd give it the benefit of the doubt.

511 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:03:52am

re: #502 vapig

I don't want to excuse the guy, but someone mentioned he was only 23. I'm thinking inexperience played a large role in this and he's lucky his actions didn't cause serious injury to this guy.

23 years old and 3 weeks out of the academy. It's in the article.

512 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:04:03am
513 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:04:06am

re: #501 ploome hineni

who else are 'we' reporting?

or dinging?

it's 1984 all over again

surrounded by BIg Brother

For everyone's review, as always stated at the top:

*Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
*Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
*Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
*Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
*REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Don't be so obtuse, Ploome. You know better.

514 Kenneth  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:04:11am

Obama’s Pick For AG “Forgot” To Note Important Blago Connection


The March 2004 Chicago news conference where Holder and Blagojevich spoke was widely covered because of a controversial 4-1 Gaming Board vote earlier that month to allow a casino to be built in Rosemont. That vote defied the recommendation of the board’s staff, which had raised concerns about alleged organized-crime links to the Rosemont casino’s developer.

Besides that, the Gaming Board’s staff had been concerned that the governor had named his close friend and fund-raiser, Christopher G. Kelly, as a “special government agent” to be involved in official state negotiations about the casino. Kelly, the Sun-Times later learned, was a business partner of Tony Rezko, another Blagojevich fund-raiser who had held an option to lease a hotel site next to the proposed casino site in Rosemont.

In an interview Tuesday, the Gaming Board’s chief investigator in 2004 said the timing of Blagojevich’s appointment of Holder raised the staff’s suspicions.

“The concern was Holder had a bias to do whatever Blagojevich wanted, which was to give the casino to Rosemont,” said Jim Wagner, who was a top Chicago FBI agent before he joined the Gaming Board, from which he retired in December 2005. “We all believed the only reason Holder was coming in was to fashion an investigation that would manipulate the casino into Rosemont.”

Obama-Emmanuel-Blago-Rezko-Holder.

Nice little Chicago-style circle jerk going on there.

515 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:04:28am

re: #497 Erik The Red

Man did everyone wake up on the wrong side this morning? Who the the trolls out today?Who Let the Dogs out?

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the world today?

516 formercorpsman  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:04:35am

Even if the cyclist had done something to deserve being stopped where the others were not, this officer should not have used a tactic like this.

He could have killed this guy, if at the very least, gravely injuring him.

I agree, these types are annoying. I can't see using this type of force for this situation though.

517 capitalist piglet  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:04:35am

re: #416 MandyManners

Why didn't the other cop maneuver into a position in which to help stop the cyclist?

I know - it looks terrible. I'm just sitting here trying to figure out why someone would do what this cop did. Did he just decide he felt like seeing some blood on the sidewalk or something? Stranger things have happened, I suppose, but it seems so weird that he picks out this one guy to stop, and in such a brutal way.

518 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:04:46am

re: #485 buzzsawmonkey

I'm just an old chunk of coal--but I'm gonna be a diamond some day.

I've not heard that one for ages!

519 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:02am

re: #427 Dark_Falcon

I had thought that initially myself, after some of the things he posted on ID threads. Lic, you need to explain yourself here.


I have warned him several times that he was on the very edge for some of his comments..But it seems to be full speed ahead, Damn the torpedoes.

520 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:06am

re: #495 gmsc

I am a little acorn,
that fact is plain to see.
But remember that the mighty oak
was once a nut like me!

Double meaning there: ACORN is nuts, and they produce trees of statism that choke out the light of freedom in this country.

521 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:06am
522 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:18am

re: #511 wrenchwench

23 years old and 3 weeks out of the academy. It's in the article.

I hope he has another sort of skill set developed. I don't think this cop thing is going to work out for him. Maybe WWE or the UFC? After he pays his fine, that is.

523 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:51am

Um, Falcon, I have no idea what you were talking about.

It's a mistype.

About not taking criticism well...I respectfully disagree. I wrote a silly rant on here that makes no sense...the kind that used to go up once in awhile in LGF's silliar days...to try and relieve tension, and I've been called a prick, GAZED at, a had insults hurled at me.

I'm in tears, actually.

524 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:51am

re: #487 Captain Amercia

As a matter of fact BOTH cops were looking DIRECTLY at this ONE cyclist as I have stated while dozens of other's passed by unmolested.
Again WHY? What brought their attention to THIS INDIVIDUAL? Obviously he did something.
Now how would you have have stopped a speeding bike without getting your leg, arm, back broken or lacerated and probably inflicting that much trauma on the bicyclist anyway? What page is that on in the police training manual? I can tell you it isn't there. That way everyone gets to Monday morning quarterback the police.

Lets hear all the magic bullet answers.
I got one: Yell "HALT! in the name of the law". Said with arm outstretched and palm facing the oncoming bike with hand turned upward!
The only thing missing are the interviews telling us all what a good boy he was. Please.

Did you read the blasted article?

525 rawmuse  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:51am

Well, I am out for the day. I was going to visit a good friend in the hospital, but I just called down there, and he passed last night. So, I really suck at grief. In my home we would bring over a plate of ham biscuits to the widow. I am just going to go over there and see if I can give some solace.

Later, Lizards!

526 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:05:58am
527 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:06:30am

re: #509 davesax

But, ask any working person in Berlin what it's like to cross the streets in this city. Last month, I watched a Jew run into a woman, and run away. Happens all the time.

/sarcasm

Did you invent the sarcasm tag too?

528 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:06:36am

re: #525 rawmuse

I' so sorry to hear that. {rawmuse}

529 lostlakehiker  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:06:49am

re: #160 stevedecatur

I'd like to believe the cop decided he would get out of the street to avoid being hit by the incoming mass of cyclists.

Then he felt threatened, as if that one cyclist was swerving close to the curb in a deliberate attempt to cut off his escape path.

I call bullshit. The cop had that collision in mind from the moment he started walking. He picks up his pace and lowers his shoulder right on schedule. The cyclist is trying to avoid the collision. "Cut off his escape" my bloody arse. If the cop had escape in mind, which he didn't, it would have been very simple. Hold up for one whole second, and the rider will be past and on his way. And then "escape" to the safety of the curb.

None of the cops was afraid of being in the middle of this bike traffic. And why would they have been? All the traffic was swerving to miss them. This rider included.

I'm rather a fan of cops. Good cops, that is. This guy, well, he's in the wrong line of work. He doesn't have the self-discipline.

530 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:06:59am

re: #524 MandyManners

Did you read the blasted article?

Of course not. It takes too much time, and it's easier to just be a jerk.

531 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:02am
532 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:09am

re: #502 vapig

He looked to be heading in a support mode. To me, they both seemed intent on the same individual while ignoring everybody else.

I don't want to excuse the guy, but someone mentioned he was only 23. I'm thinking inexperience played a large role in this and he's lucky his actions didn't cause serious injury to this guy. Hopefully he learns his lesson from this and takes his punishment like a man.

I hope his next job doesn't allow him to carry a gun.

533 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:13am

re: #412 Walter L. Newton

I don't think I've updinged/downdinged anything on this thread. Are you the one who called someone a "fascist" upthread? I didn't downding that, but I considered it. Can you tolerate not even the slightest variability of opinion without becoming a hysterical hyperbolist?

534 Bubblehead II  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:21am

OT.

Ga. judge jails Muslim woman over head scarf

*snip*

Valentine violated a court policy that prohibits people from wearing any headgear in court, police said after they arrested her Tuesday.

*snip*

"I just felt stripped of my civil, my human rights," she said Wednesday from her home. She said she was unexpectedly released after the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations urged federal authorities to investigate the incident as well as others in Georgia.

/ The rules do not apply to us

535 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:44am
536 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:49am

re: #530 Honorary Yooper

Of course not. It takes too much time, and it's easier to just be a jerk.

Clicking links is teh hard.

537 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:54am
538 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:07:55am

re: #509 davesax

Please do remember the /sarc tag though. The comment was not likely to be taken in jest without it.

539 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:08:28am

I've posted something (can't remember when) which was meant as sarc, and which I THOUGHT was obviously sarc.

I got called on it. It was right for whomever to do so.

We should be careful how we put things. This is a public forum, and crap reflects upon both the writer of it and Charles ... and ALL of us, by association, if we don't object to it.

540 yma o hyd  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:08:43am

re: #525 rawmuse

Well, I am out for the day. I was going to visit a good friend in the hospital, but I just called down there, and he passed last night. So, I really suck at grief. In my home we would bring over a plate of ham biscuits to the widow. I am just going to go over there and see if I can give some solace.

Later, Lizards!

{rawmuse}
I'm so sorry - not just about your friend's passing, but that you weren't able to see him, as you planned.
I recall you talking about it yesterday.
Just being there will help your friend's widow.

541 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:08:47am

re: #414 nyc redneck

are there guidelines for properly stopping someone on a speeding bicycle?
should he have just tried to grab him?
gotten in front of the bicycle?
stuck his baton in the spokes?

If the cyclist is just riding down the road, and the only charge would be blocking traffic, and demonstrating without a permit?

Not really.

I can see two or more cops forcing a cyclist between them and stopping him without knocking him down. Then cuffing him. But that would be it.

The thing is cops can use one force level above the aggressor to stop the aggressor. The threat the cyclist presents is not physical at this point, therefore only the least physical force on the part of cops is allowed, an hand on the arm type of thing. If the person pulls away, cops can go to the next step up. As so as the person complies cops have to step down.

542 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:08:48am

re: #501 ploome hineni

who else are 'we' reporting?

or dinging?

it's 1984 all over again

surrounded by BIg Brother

I noticed that you are not conforming to super-top-secret unofficial rule #CX. If you continue to buck the trend, and not conform to the prevailing community wisdom, the understood "we" are going to be forced to label you a "moby", "troll", and hereafter ask for your banning!
/ ;)

543 gmsc  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:09:02am

re: #478 gmsc

Sorry, I'm quite familiar with conic sections, and I didn't get the humor.

re: #505 Haverwilde

Hyperbolic as the adjective form of hyperbole, as in to exaggerate, go to the extreme. And in this case make the opposite point of what is being said. Lighten up a bit. The world is not about to end. Except maybe financially.

Oh, the irony here . . .

/OK, I'll stop taking my conic section so seriously.

544 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:09:34am

re: #511 wrenchwench

23 years old and 3 weeks out of the academy. It's in the article.

I'm house cleaning in between posts. I didn't read the article - I just watched the video. But 23 and just out of the academy? Definately an inexperienced mistake. I really hope he learns from it and I don't want it to ruin his life.

545 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:09:34am

Walter:

Don't really get your analogy...

Bikers in NYC are indeed a big problem. They run into people all of the time.

I didn't invent anything. It's been acknowledged I was the first one to use GAZE here. I'm simply taking credit for that accomplishment.

I didn't invent the sarcasm tag. Someone else did. They should be credited accordingly.

546 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:10:43am

re: #534 Bubblehead II

OT.

Ga. judge jails Muslim woman over head scarf

*snip*

Valentine violated a court policy that prohibits people from wearing any headgear in court, police said after they arrested her Tuesday.

*snip*

"I just felt stripped of my civil, my human rights," she said Wednesday from her home. She said she was unexpectedly released after the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations urged federal authorities to investigate the incident as well as others in Georgia.

/ The rules do not apply to us

Well this is a touchy subject actually. One truthfully cannot defend wearing a full face covering burqa into Court, but if it simply just covered her hair, I don't see a problem.

547 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:10:50am

Honorary Yooper:
Karma: 6,757
Registered since: Jul 30, 2006 at 3:13 pm
(Logged in)

No. of comments posted: 8,980
No. of links posted: 2,192

Davesax
Karma: -27
Registered since: Aug 21, 2004 at 7:02 am
(Logged in)

No. of comments posted: 969
No. of links posted: 0

OK, Daveax loses.

Next?

548 JohnnyReb  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:10:59am

re: #483 Iron Fist

Yeah, if you can use that, you probably won't do time. You probably will spend some time in jail. I think they've got to give you a hearing within 72 hours of your arrest. It's something like that.

Certainly, if it comes down to it, pull the gun and do what it takes. I'd rather be in court than in the morgue. Often just the threat is sufficient to end hostilities. If you are lucky, you can take care of the problem and get the hell out of Dodge before the Law becomes part of the equasion.

He spent overnight in the slammer. But in the end after a bunch of harrasement all charges were dropped.

549 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:11:12am

re: #525 rawmuse

Well, I am out for the day. I was going to visit a good friend in the hospital, but I just called down there, and he passed last night. So, I really suck at grief. In my home we would bring over a plate of ham biscuits to the widow. I am just going to go over there and see if I can give some solace.

Later, Lizards!

I'm so sorry for your loss.

550 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:11:17am

re: #487 Captain Amercia

As a matter of fact BOTH cops were looking DIRECTLY at this ONE cyclist as I have stated while dozens of other's passed by unmolested.
Again WHY? What brought their attention to THIS INDIVIDUAL? Obviously he did something.
Now how would you have have stopped a speeding bike without getting your leg, arm, back broken or lacerated and probably inflicting that much trauma on the bicyclist anyway? What page is that on in the police training manual? I can tell you it isn't there. That way everyone gets to Monday morning quarterback the police.

Lets hear all the magic bullet answers.
I got one: Yell "HALT! in the name of the law". Said with arm outstretched and palm facing the oncoming bike with hand turned upward!
The only thing missing are the interviews telling us all what a good boy he was. Please.

Which would all be well and good except for the falsification of his report. That alone says he knows he did something wrong. The supervisor that signed off on it would also know something was wrong and being falsified. The other officer that would have to write a statement would know something was wrong. The statements taken from witnesses would be in direct conflict with the two officers. At this point assuming they did not know of the existence of any video.

He can be excused for the incident and recover with additional training and experience. Falsifying a report is an incident that can not be recovered as it goes to the very fabric of our judicial system. The officer has GOT to be a credible witness and reporter of facts. His/her integrity just can not be called into question. As this guys apparently is.

551 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:11:24am

I haven't bicycled since middle school, so I have no expertise here, other than to wish the ones in Portland would learn the law. (Notably that they must follow the same traffic laws as the rest of us.)

In other bright news, the schools are out here in the Portland area, and my children are learning one of the downsides of being homeschooled.

552 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:11:49am

re: #515 Walter L. Newton

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the world today?

No Walter not at all. All I am trying to get across is that people are judging the LEO on a 30 second video clip, taken by the activists. Don't make your final judgment on him until ALL the fact are out. Let the law take its course. A lot of people here have found him guilty all ready.

553 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:12:01am
554 Ojoe  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:12:12am

re: #121 jcm

As a fan of bicycles & a rider of one, I cannot stand the "critical mass" idiots, they do all the rest of the bike riders a terrible disservice.

May they all get flats.

555 Sunlight  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:12:33am

What a bunch of cranky people today. Maybe we forgot to eat breakfast...

556 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:12:45am

re: #533 Lincolntf

I don't think I've updinged/downdinged anything on this thread. Are you the one who called someone a "fascist" upthread? I didn't downding that, but I considered it. Can you tolerate not even the slightest variability of opinion without becoming a hysterical hyperbolist?

Yea jerk, check out re: #323 davesax

557 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:12:47am

re: #515 Walter L. Newton

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the world today?

Missed that I am on the wrong side of the world./

558 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:12:58am

father_of_10.

What do I lose? I didn't know I was competing for anything.

559 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:13:17am

re: #523 davesax

Um, Falcon, I have no idea what you were talking about.

It's a mistype.

About not taking criticism well...I respectfully disagree. I wrote a silly rant on here that makes no sense...the kind that used to go up once in awhile in LGF's silliar days...to try and relieve tension, and I've been called a prick, GAZED at, a had insults hurled at me.

I'm in tears, actually.

re: #431 davesax

Dark Falkon,

The UN's Special Rapporteur for the "Occupied Palestinian Territories" is named Falk. I thought you were comparing me to him.

560 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:13:24am

re: #556 Walter L. Newton

That was humor. It had to have been.

561 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:13:36am

I ride my bike to work and back 6 days a week. The only way I annoy drivers is by stopping at the stop sign even though the driver, who has no stop sign, is waving at me to proceed.

I hate Critical Mass riders because they make cycling more dangerous for the rest of us.

Thanks for the thread, Charles. I'm gonna go wrench on some bikes now.

562 Captain Amercia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:13:45am

Ok 516 your taking a page out of Obama's play book. He advocates "Change" but never seems to define what that change is.
You are critical of the cop's tactics but don give any specifics on what YOU would have done. Obviously if you did then you would open yourself up for Monday morning quarterbacking. You also failed to suggest what the COP should have done.
Of course from where YOU sit you can't understand using force like this. But the cop DIDN'T kill the guy. So I guess his training, fresh in his mind after recently graduating the academy kicked in. He stopped a moving suspect with no police injuries and minimum injury (If any) to the suspect.
No wonder no one wants to be a cop anymore. Thankless as it gets.

563 badger1970  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:13:48am

The officer was wrong using that forearm shiver. What I find interesting that the camera panned to the officers in the middle of those ash-hats and stayed on that officer until the cyclist got tossed into the barrier. Was that a coincidence?

The smarmy captions in that video makes it propaganda footage.

564 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:13:53am

re: #554 Ojoe

As a fan of bicycles & a rider of one, I cannot stand the "critical mass" idiots, they do all the rest of the bike riders a terrible disservice.

May they all get flats.

They have that moral superiority of "being right" and showing everyone how right they are.

Result, they piss everyone off and make life rough for all other cyclists.

The Fred Phelps of the bike world.

565 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:14:04am
566 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:14:25am

JCM:

how does the dictionary get updated?

567 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:14:38am

re: #512 ploome hineni

oh

Good Afternoon Ploome!
Hope today finds you well and no longer sick or feeling lousy..

568 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:14:47am
569 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:14:49am

re: #557 Erik The Red

Missed that I am on the wrong side of the world./

Yes, it was a joke, which was not funny now that I had to explain.

570 notutopia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:14:55am

If all WE have to go on is the U tube vids, I'd say that this cop is history on the force for a long while.
If there was a valid reason to single out this one cyclist for take down...we're still waiting to see or read about it. Just making an important judgement of guilt should not be based solely on rendition of a vid/s
The cop says he's not guilty. The cyclist says he is.
They also do have street cams and police radio contact continuously monitored.
We'll get more in a few days...

571 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:15:04am

re: #557 Erik The Red

Missed that I am on the wrong side of the world./

Heh.
Erik, the ultimate retort to Walter is that he's "beneath you".

/very true, too ... (-:

572 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:15:09am

re: #558 davesax

father_of_10.

What do I lose? I didn't know I was competing for anything.

Didn't you know that number of posts, links and karma give status, and the all important gravitas?

573 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:15:26am
574 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:15:38am

re: #535 ploome hineni

"Shut the fuck up"? Piss off, Ploome. I've read your comments before, so knock it off.

Plus, LGF has not been here for over a decade.

575 MandyManners  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:15:48am

re: #534 Bubblehead II

OT.

Ga. judge jails Muslim woman over head scarf

*snip*

Valentine violated a court policy that prohibits people from wearing any headgear in court, police said after they arrested her Tuesday.

*snip*

"I just felt stripped of my civil, my human rights," she said Wednesday from her home. She said she was unexpectedly released after the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations urged federal authorities to investigate the incident as well as others in Georgia.

/ The rules do not apply to us

She was arrested when she cussed at the bailiff.

576 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:16:18am
577 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:16:30am

Falcon:

Why would I compare you to him?

C'mon...friend.

I don't have anything against anyone here. I just wrote a silly diatribe and forgot to end it with a sarcastic tab.

On another note, how does one get the LGF dictionary updated? GAZE is one of my finer life accomplishments and I want th ecredit for it.

578 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:16:34am

Coining a term on LGF doesn't mean you're not an asshole.

579 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:16:56am

...ah its the Season of Joy at LGF today I see...

Joy to this thread, the bicyclist has come...

580 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:16:56am
581 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:17:14am

re: #525 rawmuse

Well, I am out for the day. I was going to visit a good friend in the hospital, but I just called down there, and he passed last night. So, I really suck at grief. In my home we would bring over a plate of ham biscuits to the widow. I am just going to go over there and see if I can give some solace.

Later, Lizards!


Sorry to hear that Raw..

582 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:17:16am

I think the cop should be awarded a contract with the Arena Football league!

583 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:17:19am

re: #578 Sharmuta

Coining a term on LGF doesn't mean you're not an asshole.

No, but maybe an asshole with a diploma?

584 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:17:46am

re: #580 ploome hineni

YOU FOGOT THE DINGS

/and the glowing responses from the amen corner, from the dinggang dingalings

~obey!

585 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:17:58am
586 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:18:02am

re: #558 davesax

father_of_10.

What do I lose? I didn't know I was competing for anything.

Didn't know this was a competition either.

587 lostlakehiker  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:18:04am

re: #310 Outrider

Could be. It looked like both officers started walking an intercept course at the same time towards the same cyclist. Neither officer looked particularly peeved. But they both started walking in the take down mode after the one cyclist.

Unless the cyclist had paper out on him, This officer has a hard trial coming up.

The worst part of it is the falsifying of records. Having taken a few falls, and Charles' opinion notwithstanding, I don't see the potential for serious injury in this incident. So it's simple assault, not felony assault, in my book.

Rewriting history is triply wrong. It's wrong because it falsely exonerates the cop. It's wrong because it falsely implicates the rider---it's an attempt to frame the fellow. And it's wrong because it undercuts the level of respect people have for the law in general. We can't tolerate a system in which the law makes up its own facts.

If I get to write the rest of the story, the cyclist apologizes to the cop for having participated in a provocation. He gets just enough damages in his civil suit to cover the fine he's assessed for running the red light.

The cop apologizes to the cyclist for having knocked him down with a shoulder tackle. He gets probation on the assault charge, and a suspended sentence for the records falsification, but he's dismissed from the force.

And the judge instructs everybody to grow up.

588 Kenneth  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:18:13am

re: #553 Iron Fist

It looks like Holder's job is not so much AG as 'conciliary' to the Chicago crime syndicate that is about to move into the White house.

I agree: he must be blocked.

589 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:18:23am

Sharmuta:

Wow, you got me there.

Ploome:

Hey...thanks for your support.

Have we met?

590 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:18:42am

re: #566 davesax

JCM:

how does the dictionary get updated?

Don't know who "owns" it right now, used to be zombie.

I understand your frustration at the cyclists. And really don't care that much about the Massholes. Being a Masshole however isn't an invitation to assault.

I do care that a cop stepped over the the line, and further committed perjury in his reports.

591 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:18:49am

re: #556 Walter L. Newton

Yea jerk, check out re: #323 davesax

OK, once again Lincolntf is revealed as a liar. I agree with Walter now.re: #533 Lincolntf

I don't think I've updinged/downdinged anything on this thread. Are you the one who called someone a "fascist" upthread? I didn't downding that, but I considered it. Can you tolerate not even the slightest variability of opinion without becoming a hysterical hyperbolist?

GAZE

592 notutopia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:18:56am

re: #525 rawmuse

So sorry you didn't get to tell him goodbye Rawmuse.
{Rawmuse}

593 Sunlight  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:19:02am

re: #579 WrathofG-d

...ah its the Season of Joy at LGF today I see...

Joy to this thread, the bicyclist has come...

Sounds like my kids fighting. Gah!

594 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:19:26am

re: #578 Sharmuta

(teasing, Sharm, see the updings)
You should change your avatar to a Gila Monster -- they don't let go.

595 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:19:27am

re: #568 ploome hineni

davesax

The dictionary entry is incorrect, which was the reference I used. And I conceded the point.

596 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:20:27am

re: #593 Sunlight

Sounds like my kids fighting. Gah!

I get a bit worked up here, but when it gets down to outright name calling, silly infighting over ultimately meaningless things, i pretty much roll my eyes.

an already "tough crowd" gets a bit more testy in Winter i have noticed.

597 Buck  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:20:33am

re: #466 Haverwilde

Are you sure you want to do that? It just seemed like hyperbolic humor.

If it is humor then, taken out of context, it can be used against this website, and our host.

If it is not Humor, then in context it can be used against this website, and our host.

We would not think it was funny if Kossaks were suggesting that kind of action against protesters.

IMO it is garbage on the floor of our nice clean sitting area. I just wish people knew better than to quote it in it's entirety. Makes deleting it pointless.

598 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:20:36am

We should've let this morph into a boob thread . . . oh wait, I think it did.

599 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:20:52am

re: #577 davesax

Falcon:

Why would I compare you to him?

C'mon...friend.

I don't have anything against anyone here. I just wrote a silly diatribe and forgot to end it with a sarcastic tab.

On another note, how does one get the LGF dictionary updated? GAZE is one of my finer life accomplishments and I want th ecredit for it.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on this one. I accept that you were not trying to be hurtful towards me.

600 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:21:08am
601 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:21:41am

JCM:

I never said he deserved to be assaulted.

I just want the dictionary to be updated ;-).

602 Sunlight  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:21:48am

re: #596 WrathofG-d

I get a bit worked up here, but when it gets down to outright name calling, silly infighting over ultimately meaningless things, i pretty much roll my eyes.

an already "tough crowd" gets a bit more testy in Winter i have noticed.

Maybe they started the Drink! game early today.
/

603 Sharmuta  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:22:00am

Stinky's in da house.

604 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:22:18am

A bit hesitant to offer this up, as I have not been registered that long, but...

Asking for clarification is fine by me. Something like: Did you forget the sarc tag? Did you mean X? Because it sounds like it.

A troll will just keep digging, and a reasonable person will be allowed to clear up his/her record.

605 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:22:22am

re: #587 lostlakehiker

The worst part of it is the falsifying of records. Having taken a few falls, and Charles' opinion notwithstanding, I don't see the potential for serious injury in this incident. So it's simple assault, not felony assault, in my book.

Rewriting history is triply wrong. It's wrong because it falsely exonerates the cop. It's wrong because it falsely implicates the rider---it's an attempt to frame the fellow. And it's wrong because it undercuts the level of respect people have for the law in general. We can't tolerate a system in which the law makes up its own facts.

If I get to write the rest of the story, the cyclist apologizes to the cop for having participated in a provocation. He gets just enough damages in his civil suit to cover the fine he's assessed for running the red light.

The cop apologizes to the cyclist for having knocked him down with a shoulder tackle. He gets probation on the assault charge, and a suspended sentence for the records falsification, but he's dismissed from the force.

And the judge instructs everybody to grow up.

Yes. See my #550. ;-)>

606 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:22:26am
607 monkeytime  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:22:44am

Hey - you guys started Festivus without me. Where do I sign up for the Feats Of Strength?

608 2by2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:22:46am

re: #434 MandyManners

I would if I would know how.

609 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:22:56am
610 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:23:06am

re: #600 taxfreekiller

Government Conference:
"How To Maximize Taxes Per Human"
Lecture by , B. Obama.

I'm I missing something here. I know TFK has always has sort of a "slided" into a topic from a very acute angle, but lately, I'm getting the distinct feeling that his comments are coming from a different plane.

611 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:23:08am

re: #602 Sunlight

Maybe they started the Drink! game early today.
/

here maybe instead of arguing we can do something good this winter and contribute to a needy charity!

612 Sunlight  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:23:22am

re: #605 Outrider

Possible broken tailbone.

613 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:23:43am

re: #582 father_of_10

I think the cop should be awarded a contract with the Arena Football league!


They aren't going to play in 2009.. No money and the Gov't won't bail them out.
So we'll have to think of another long term career for him.

614 jcm  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:05am

Gotta go...
Later.

615 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:10am

re: #604 EmmmieG

A bit hesitant to offer this up, as I have not been registered that long, but...

Asking for clarification is fine by me. Something like: Did you forget the sarc tag? Did you mean X? Because it sounds like it.

A troll will just keep digging, and a reasonable person will be allowed to clear up his/her record.

You're correct -- and it's a good offering.

616 nyc redneck  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:19am

anyway, i really used to love riding my bike in the city. it is such a good way to get around. and i never felt it was dangerous at all.
some s.o.b. stole my bike last year.
it was green, my favorite color and had a pretty basket (real wicker basket) on the front w/ pink flowers on it.
if anyone sees it let me know.

617 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:25am
618 Erik The Red  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:32am

re: #574 Honorary Yooper

"Shut the fuck up"? Piss off, Ploome. I've read your comments before, so knock it off.

Plus, LGF has not been here for over a decade.

WOW cool off guys. You both have been here a long time and add to the value of this forum. Chill.

619 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:45am
620 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:45am

re: #613 HoosierHoops

They aren't going to play in 2009.. No money and the Gov't won't bail them out.
So we'll have to think of another long term career for him.

Oops, I forgot my sarc tag!

621 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:24:47am
622 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:25:09am

re: #610 Walter L. Newton

I'm I missing something here. I know TFK has always has sort of a "slided" into a topic from a very acute angle, but lately, I'm getting the distinct feeling that his comments are coming from a different plane.

Would that be a 737, a 727, a 747, or maybe an A380?

623 Captain Amercia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:25:21am

Yes I read the article and so what? The DA threw out his report. Again so what? In the Cops opinion the bicyclist swerved into him. Your talking about TWO seconds of reaction time. If you watch the video the cyclist DOESN'T STOP peddling. He never levels out the pedals or goes one leg up. He keeps peddling until impact.
The DA watched the video after the fact, assumed a hippy outcry and decided it wasn't worth his time and effort. It was easier to throw the cop under the bus. Happens all of the time. Doesn't mean a thing.
As far as resisting you can 't see or hear what takes place as he's being cuffed. The perp's lawyer said he sustained only MINOR injuries.
Good work officer.

624 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:25:33am
625 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:25:36am

PLOOME!

626 victor_yugo  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:26:56am

re: #590 jcm

Being a Masshole however isn't an invitation to assault.

Concur, and I will add that, unless the cyclist himself was committing a crime at that moment, his affiliation (or lack of same) with C.M. is immaterial to the situation. He may have been just a Joe on a bike, caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.

(Note that, if a riot act had been invoked, and an order to disperse had been given, then the cyclist would be committing a crime by not dismounting his bike and walking away. But again, his affiliation or lack of same with C.M. doesn't pertain to that.)

627 Sunlight  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:27:01am

re: #611 WrathofG-d

here maybe instead of arguing we can do something good this winter and contribute to a needy charity!

Hard to know if it gets to them (see front page this week). I know an orphanage/home for boys that we did a project with and visited while we were in Jerusalem. I want to find one for girls too. And get them to get onto paypal so it goes straight to them and donations are all documented.

628 nyc redneck  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:27:07am

re: #624 buzzsawmonkey

Your bike has been stripped for parts and shipped to South America.

Or painted anarchist colors and smuggled to Williamsburg.

well, i have the promise of the unicorn. and he knows i want one that flies.
and is trained to attack thieves.

629 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:27:27am

davesax is NOT a troll

630 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:27:46am

re: #623 Captain Amercia

So, are you saying we should just take the officer's word for it, contrary to any other evidence?

631 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:28:50am

WriterMOM!

Hey, how are you?

Long Time NO See...

Can someone update the dictionary? I want be credited for my GAZE invention. It's a proud life accomplishment ;-)

632 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:29:07am
633 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:29:25am

re: #629 WriterMom

davesax is NOT a troll

That's what billy goats gruff said.

634 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:29:42am
635 bulwrk  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:29:56am

I am not a cyclist but couldn't he have just stopped when it appeared the cop had zeroed in on him and was moving to intersect his path?It doesn't seem like trying to speed past him was a good idea.

636 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:30:02am
637 SFGoth  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:30:04am

This looked like a cop who had no idea he was being filmed, who got PO'd with the riders, and decided to take his frustrations out. He basically named himself starting cornerback and knocked the rider clear out of bounds with what used to be called, in basketball, a chest pass. I'm all for shooting abusive critical mass riders -- I live in the belly of the beast -- but even if the rider was calling the cop a fucking pig, battery is out of the question. Think about it, this is not an isolated, momentary lapse of judgment. This is most likely a cop with control problems. Do you want him taking you out with something deadlier because he doesn't like what you're doing? How about if you're speeding to get your pregnant wife, in labor, to the hospital and he decides to cuff you, tearing your rotator cuff in the process, while your wife has a breach birth and the baby dies? Rodney King may have deserved *it* but this guy didn't.

638 Bubblehead II  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:30:10am

re: #546 WrathofG-d

Well this is a touchy subject actually. One truthfully cannot defend wearing a full face covering burqa into Court, but if it simply just covered her hair, I don't see a problem.

I agree that it is, too a point, a silly rule. But it is a still a rule that she was obligated to follow. As for her arrest. The article states that she was at a security checkpoint when asked to remove it and she refused. But I think that refusal wasn't what got her busted. It was this.

*snip*

Hall said Valentine, an insurance underwriter, told the bailiff that she had been in courtrooms before with the scarf on and that removing it would be a religious violation. When she turned to leave and uttered an expletive, Hall said a bailiff handcuffed her and took her before the judge.

639 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:30:37am

re: #529 lostlakehiker

I call bullshit. The cop had that collision in mind from the moment he started walking. He picks up his pace and lowers his shoulder right on schedule. The cyclist is trying to avoid the collision. "Cut off his escape" my bloody arse. If the cop had escape in mind, which he didn't, it would have been very simple. Hold up for one whole second, and the rider will be past and on his way. And then "escape" to the safety of the curb.

None of the cops was afraid of being in the middle of this bike traffic. And why would they have been? All the traffic was swerving to miss them. This rider included.

I'm rather a fan of cops. Good cops, that is. This guy, well, he's in the wrong line of work. He doesn't have the self-discipline.

Upding but one quibble.

The cyclist is trying to avoid the collision

The bike has breaks. I think every honest cyclists here will admit that they are not always used when "swerving around the pedestrian" seems like a workable plan.

The cyclist could have stopped for the cop.

Not defending the cop here - just pointing out that the cyclist was an ass hole too.

640 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:31:19am

re: #631 davesax

WriterMOM!

Hey, how are you?

Long Time NO See...

Can someone update the dictionary? I want be credited for my GAZE invention. It's a proud life accomplishment ;-)

I want to Copyright ones and zeros so that i can start charging Bill Gates usuage fees.

641 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:31:34am

re: #637 SFGoth

This looked like a cop who had no idea he was being filmed, who got PO'd with the riders, and decided to take his frustrations out. He basically named himself starting cornerback and knocked the rider clear out of bounds with what used to be called, in basketball, a chest pass. I'm all for shooting abusive critical mass riders -- I live in the belly of the beast -- but even if the rider was calling the cop a fucking pig, battery is out of the question. Think about it, this is not an isolated, momentary lapse of judgment. This is most likely a cop with control problems. Do you want him taking you out with something deadlier because he doesn't like what you're doing? How about if you're speeding to get your pregnant wife, in labor, to the hospital and he decides to cuff you, tearing your rotator cuff in the process, while your wife has a breach birth and the baby dies? Rodney King may have deserved *it* but this guy didn't.

Exactly.

Now fellow lizards: Can't we all just get along?

642 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:31:41am

re: #631 davesax

Hi davesax-a REALLY long time... I'm good still fighting the good fight. Where have you been?

643 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:31:48am

Hey, Dave, where you going with that sarcasm in your hand? No need to get all New York with it.

I understand your frustration with city cyclists though. When I lived there I had many a rage-inducing moment with those reckless idiots. Not ball bearing rage, but close.

644 victor_yugo  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:31:51am

re: #623 Captain Amercia

In the Cops opinion the bicyclist swerved into him. Your talking about TWO seconds of reaction time. If you watch the video the cyclist DOESN'T STOP peddling. He never levels out the pedals or goes one leg up. He keeps peddling until impact.

It's more than that--the cyclist was steering to avoid collision with the cop, and the cop was on an active intercept course. If anything, the cop induced the cyclist to steer dangerously close to the crowd on the sidewalk.

but I see you already have your down-dings

645 phoenixgirl  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:31:54am

re: #58 Ford_Prefect

I am sorry, Walter, but you are wrong. It isn't the same thing at all. As I said, If he was justified in stopping the cyclist he could have done it differently, but to say it is the same as beating a wife is just wrong.

yep

646 vapig  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:33:01am

re: #637 SFGoth

He's 23 and fresh out of the academy. Hardly a serial offender.

647 tfc3rid  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:33:42am

re: #582 father_of_10

I think the cop should be awarded a contract with the Arena Football league!

Arena League not playing the 2009 season this year... No $$, teams folding, no ESPN Contract...

648 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:33:51am
649 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:33:56am

re: #638 Bubblehead II

Yea cursing the cop out probably wasn't helpful, but I again dont' think that telling a cop to ___ should get one arrested.

Its an interesting issue however. (the burqa, Court issue).

650 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:34:01am

re: #556 Walter L. Newton

re: #533 Lincolntf

Have you checked out your lie yet? Haven't seen your answer?

You up dinged this jerks comment re: #323 davesax

651 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:34:03am

Charles:

Hey man, good to hear from you!

I was totally joking. Of course I'd never want to harm anyone...I was just trying to get a laugh.

I guess it was a bad effort. I apologize if I made anyone upset. Next time I'll use the tags.

652 anotherindyfilmguy  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:34:26am

I want to see the video from the opposite angle.

653 Bubblehead II  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:34:53am

re: #575 MandyManners

Yep, if she would have kept her mouth shut, she wouldn't have been arrested.

654 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:34:58am

WriterMom:

I've been reading LGF every day. Just don't post much anymore. Life is good. Many lifechanges for the better.

You?

655 Spare O'Lake  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:35:02am

Hello all you nice smart funny folks.
I would be much obliged if you would all ding up this comment.
You see, I want to improve my Karma batting average so I can raise my Zionist billing rate. I need the extra cash to tide me over until my government bail-out check arrives.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Best Regards,
S. O'Lake

656 SFGoth  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:35:12am

re: #646 vapig

He's 23 and fresh out of the academy. Hardly a serial offender.

A lot of people have been assholes their whole lives by 23.

657 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:35:17am
658 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:35:18am

re: #636 Iron Fist

You sure you are up to that? You have to be able to bench press a hundred pounds.

With your tounge.

No, dummy, it's Feats of Strength. You have to be able to bench-press 100 lbs. with yo' feats.

659 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:35:23am

re: #652 anotherindyfilmguy

I want to see the video from the opposite angle.

Well, I guess you'll have to find one? Duh.

660 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:35:27am

re: #652 anotherindyfilmguy

I want to see the video from the opposite angle.

The grassy knoll video isn't very good.

661 karmic_inquisitor  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:35:35am

re: #598 father_of_10

We should've let this morph into a boob thread . . . oh wait, I think it did.

Last thread had a "udder" fixation. So the MDBT threshold has been hit (minimum daily boob thread).

662 LGoPs  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:36:31am

re: #523 davesax

Um, Falcon, I have no idea what you were talking about.

It's a mistype.

About not taking criticism well...I respectfully disagree. I wrote a silly rant on here that makes no sense...the kind that used to go up once in awhile in LGF's silliar days...to try and relieve tension, and I've been called a prick, GAZED at, a had insults hurled at me.

I'm in tears, actually.

Well Jeez Loueez. I'm fairly new here, don't know you from olden days but you were getting me pissed off and I was just lurking. You certainly pissed off a lot of people that I respect here. Bottom line is I flunked mind reading in college and what was so 'over the top' to you was not so apparent to us. My computer only translates text, not facial expressions, so if your intent is to be toungue in cheek, then type it so...

663 Randall Gross  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:37:03am

re: #651 davesax

Charles:

Hey man, good to hear from you!

I was totally joking. Of course I'd never want to harm anyone...I was just trying to get a laugh.

I guess it was a bad effort. I apologize if I made anyone upset. Next time I'll use the tags.

I totally got it, but at the same time said to myself, bet that gets deleted and misinterpreted w/o the tag.

664 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:37:26am

re: #610 Walter L. Newton

I'm I missing something here. I know TFK has always has sort of a "slided" into a topic from a very acute angle, but lately, I'm getting the distinct feeling that his comments are coming from a different plane.

TFK has indicated in the past that he has American Indian blood. Maybe he's one of those Planes Indians.

665 LGoPs  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:37:38am

PIMF Tongue

666 victor_yugo  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:37:42am

re: #653 Bubblehead II

Yep, if she would have kept her mouth shut, she wouldn't have been arrested.

Are you sure about that? After all, this whole thread is about a stupid cop with self-control problems.

667 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:37:42am

re: #531 ploome hineni

LOL

668 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:38:24am

re: #664 Occasional Reader

TFK has indicated in the past that he has American Indian blood. Maybe he's one of those Planes Indians.

Have we come full around to that again?

669 Honorary Yooper  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:38:30am

re: #664 Occasional Reader

TFK has indicated in the past that he has American Indian blood. Maybe he's one of those Planes Indians.

What's his tribe? Southwest, Delta, United, American?

670 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:39:03am

LGoPS

"Bottom line is I flunked mind reading in college and what was so 'over the top' to you was not so apparent to us."

Yes, I understand. This has been made clear now, over and over.

I will ONCE AGAIN...state FOR THE RECORD...that I wasn't advocating police brutality against anyone. It has been a few years since I posted,
here, I and I didn't realize people would take my silly rant so seriously.

I APOLOGIZE IF I OFFENDED ANYONE.

Can we move on, now?

Thanks.

671 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:39:05am

re: #654 davesax

Life has been busy, but I still try to do my part. I still meet regularly with local and international lizards wherever and whenever I can. Good lifechanges for you-that's great to hear.

672 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:39:14am

re: #639 karmic_inquisitor

I think every honest cyclists here will admit that they are not always used when "swerving around the pedestrian" seems like a workable plan.

I do have to admit, swerving around is often the safer course of action than trying to jam on the brakes (same is true in a car).

673 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:39:35am

re: #668 Walter L. Newton

"All roads lead to TFK."

674 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:40:25am

re: #669 Honorary Yooper

What's his tribe? Southwest, Delta, United, American?

Casimir effect.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

If you understand it, it it answer a lot of questions.

675 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:40:25am

re: #663 Thanos

I totally got it, but at the same time said to myself, bet that gets deleted and misinterpreted w/o the tag.

Yeah ... problem is that those kinds of posts are just ripe for taking out of context. Hey, it would be great if everything you wrote here was private, but it ain't -- the world can read this and not everyone is our friend. That's why it's best to be as clear as possible when employing 'edgy' humor.

676 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:40:28am
677 Captain Amercia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:41:00am

623 No not at all. That is what COURTS are for. What I am saying, or rather what aggravates me to no end is people who immediately second guess the police based on very limited information.

The first time I ever saw a guy get hit with a nightstick I was really shocked. But the guy deserved it no question about it and looking back I am amazed that the cops used that much restraint. But nonetheless it LOOKED really bad.
It SOUNDED really bad. But then I realized I NEVER saw or heard that before. It's still not pleasant. But it's not meant to be. It's meant to suck...bad.

So while most of us get to sleep in warm beds cops have to try and keep civilization from imploding. Assclowns on bikes who make it more aggravating for the rest of us to go about our lives get LESS sympathy from me than cops do. That what I'm about.

If the cop did use EXCESSIVE force then he was wrong and for the legal system to decide. But this video FAR from PROVES anything. This is what it looks like when you subdue a guy speeding by on a bike. This video proves one thing: A suspect was apprehended by the Police. Period.

678 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:41:02am

WILL EVERYONE GIVE DAVESAX who is NOT A TROLL A FRIGGIN BREAK?

A lot of 'old timers' pop in now and again, and might not know all the things like sarc tags, and how to use the new buttons. So give people a break. He has apologized for his sins...

679 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:41:09am

re: #476 MandyManners

To all of you defending/applauding the cop, I hope Santa gives you a few lumps of coal.

Well, Mandy, if you are including me in that group, I have a 23 year old son about to graduate with a degree in Criminal Justice. Do you suppose that might make me a little slower to condemn another kid who lacks experience?

680 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:41:25am

And that being said, I'd appreciate if someone updated the dictionary about the use of GAZE. I don't post here anymore, but I've been reading LGF for a long time and am proud of my silly accomplishment in contributing to its discourse.

Thanks.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

681 LGoPs  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:41:46am

re: #670 davesax

Agreed. Peace...

682 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:42:03am

re: #643 Charles


I understand your frustration with city cyclists though. When I lived there I had many a rage-inducing moment with those reckless idiots. Not ball bearing rage, but close.

NYC has awful cyclists, awful pedestrians, and awful drivers. (And yet I still like the place.) The traffic interaction among the three is like a Hieronymous Bosch painting at times. DC is somewhat better (particularly on the cyclist end, for some reason, they're a lot more repsectful here on average).

683 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:42:20am
684 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:42:37am

Charles:

Point taken. You know I have nothing but respect for what you do, here, so I'll observe those rules in the future.

It seems the dynamic in the blogging world has gotten more intense since I last posted.

Again, my apologies.

685 Randall Gross  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:42:40am

re: #675 Charles

It got a big laugh out of me, so I hope Dave doesn't stop posting.

686 father_of_10  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:43:24am

re: #661 karmic_inquisitor

Last thread had a "udder" fixation. So the MDBT threshold has been hit (minimum daily boob thread).

I guess I missed the main points of the last thread.

687 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:43:26am

re: #650 Walter L. Newton

Oh, great arbiter of truth. Read my post. I was quite clear that I might have gone up or down on something and forgot about it. I rarely do either but occasionally it strikes me as easier than posting a response asking if I get the joke. What's the harm if it's a mistaken upding?
Anyway, whoever the poster was basically cast himself as a comic book vigilante hero. How do you not get that?

688 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:43:54am

Now that we are all hugs & kisses...can we get on with it?

OT:

AFP: [Military Attacks Against Israel's Civilian Population] Rocket Fire Raises Concerns Over Gaza Truce

.

Palestinians got $1.7bln in aid last year: France (and my have they done so much good with it.../)

.

Oh, Canada. :(

.

World To Israel: All Your Sovereignty Is Belongs To Us. (...and the entire World will turn as one against Israel...)

689 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:44:23am

re: #683 ploome hineni

We could do the Hora!

690 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:44:24am

re: #678 WriterMom

WILL EVERYONE GIVE DAVESAX who is NOT A TROLL A FRIGGIN BREAK?

A lot of 'old timers' pop in now and again, and might not know all the things like sarc tags, and how to use the new buttons. So give people a break. He has apologized for his sins...

**Said in a sheepish voice**

Actually, some of us newer lizards with ADD never made it all the way through the dictionary, and didn't realize what the sarc tags were for. As I can, and have, peeled paint off the walls with sarcasm, I will be very careful to use them in the future. Although I think I posted a few backwards. \/// (Does backwards mean dead serious?)

691 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:44:44am

re: #678 WriterMom

WILL EVERYONE GIVE DAVESAX who is NOT A TROLL A FRIGGIN BREAK?

A lot of 'old timers' pop in now and again, and might not know all the things like sarc tags, and how to use the new buttons. So give people a break. He has apologized for his sins...

Yes, LGF is against elder abuse!

692 Randall Gross  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:44:49am

re: #680 davesax

And that being said, I'd appreciate if someone updated the dictionary about the use of GAZE. I don't post here anymore, but I've been reading LGF for a long time and am proud of my silly accomplishment in contributing to its discourse.

Thanks.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Zombie took the entire dictionary offsite, but it got hacked. ... Don't know current status, but Charles said something about hosting it or something. I know that Z had a very well researched version saved, so hope to see it again soon.

693 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:45:57am

That's what we need INVISIBLE LIZARD INK/TEXT for.

694 badger1970  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:48:01am

The cyclist was indeed leaning right to swerve between the intercepting officer and the crowd (barrier). So technically the cyclist was avoiding a collision but was he obeying a command from that officer? Was something shouted at the cyclist before the forced dismount? What was the role of the second officer in this scene?

Questions of which the answers aren't forthcoming. What is the correct procedure from for stopping a moving cyclist that needed to be stopped? I can't think of any way that the cyclist wouldn't have felt assulted.

695 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:50:21am

A few things, guys:

1. When I used to post here...years ago, it was a different dynamic because it was smaller and many of the frequent posters had met in person.

2. I don't think I have more credibility than anyone else simply because I'm an old timer.

3. It's just comments on a blog...and Charles has politely reprimanded me and I will respect his wishes.

4. I've grown up since I posted here years ago. I don't take anything personally, and don't call anyone names. That's my credo.

Now, can someone ATTEMPT TO SAY SOMETHING FUNNY? Man, I live in New York City. They're taxing ITUNES for G-d's sake, the subway service is getting worse, and they want to raise taxes. AGAIN.

I came here to unwind, not to start a hateful thread.

Can anyone make us laugh?

696 Aye Pod  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:50:26am

re: #637 SFGoth

Yep. It doesn't take a genius to see that this guy became a cop for the wrong reasons. A clear case of unwarranted brutality which could easily have resulted in the cyclist's death.

697 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:52:32am
698 monkeytime  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:52:41am

re: #636 Iron Fist

You sure you are up to that? You have to be able to bench press a hundred pounds.

With your tounge. you'll be immensely popular :-)

lol! I should sign up for fencing because my sharp tongue can shred to bits. I won't be too popular though. :>)

699 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:52:45am
700 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:52:51am

re: #695 davesax

{DAVESAX}

Great post. I would love to make you laugh, I think it would be a great if everyone found something that brings teh funny or post something with Holiday Cheer in mind.

701 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:53:05am

re: #693 WriterMom

That's what we need INVISIBLE LIZARD INK/TEXT for.


Some of my finest most concise posts have been in Invisible lizard ink.
I have the invisible updings to prove it...
Hi Writermom!

702 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:53:43am

re: #701 HoosierHoops

Hi HoosierHoops!

:)

703 WrathofG-d  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:55:16am

hi me

704 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:55:54am

Jimmah:

I think a lot of people become cops for the wrong reasons.

I have a friend who polices on of the worst districts in the city, and he talks to me about this a lot. It's miserable, ungratifying, work. Cops in NYC have a high rate or heart attacks, divorces, suicides, and alchohol problems.

And they are under enormous pressure because of Comstadt.

I can't see why anyone would want the job.

705 rgranger  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:55:59am

Maybe the guy failed to stop for a previous cop... you know, when you run from the cops, they don't give you a 2nd warning before putting out the spike strips.

706 Aye Pod  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:56:24am

re: #695 davesax

If you want a good laugh try this. Someone posted it in spinoffs earlier in the week. Don't click though if you are sensitive about blaspheming Mel Gibson.

707 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:56:29am

re: #703 WrathofG-d

hi me

Hi me!
hope today finds you well.

708 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:56:34am

re: #695 davesax

A few things, guys:

1. When I used to post here...years ago, it was a different dynamic because it was smaller and many of the frequent posters had met in person.

2. I don't think I have more credibility than anyone else simply because I'm an old timer.

3. It's just comments on a blog...and Charles has politely reprimanded me and I will respect his wishes.

4. I've grown up since I posted here years ago. I don't take anything personally, and don't call anyone names. That's my credo.

Now, can someone ATTEMPT TO SAY SOMETHING FUNNY? Man, I live in New York City. They're taxing ITUNES for G-d's sake, the subway service is getting worse, and they want to raise taxes. AGAIN.

I came here to unwind, not to start a hateful thread.

Can anyone make us laugh?

Blind man walks into a bar and starts swinging his seeing eye dog around and around and around his head.
Bartender says, "Hey, stop that! What in hell you think you are doing?"
Blind man says, "just taking a look around"
BA DA BOOM
--tough crowd---

709 Randall Gross  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:57:14am

re: #695 davesax

Robert Plant:

"Does Anyone Remember Laughter?"

... you have to get the creaky falsetto right when you say it though.

710 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:59:03am

re: #687 Lincolntf

Oh, great arbiter of truth. Read my post. I was quite clear that I might have gone up or down on something and forgot about it. I rarely do either but occasionally it strikes me as easier than posting a response asking if I get the joke. What's the harm if it's a mistaken upding?
Anyway, whoever the poster was basically cast himself as a comic book vigilante hero. How do you not get that?

Then let's learn something. We have a little thing here called a sarcasm tag. It's a forward slash "/" We use it to indicate that our comment was meant as sarcasm or tongue in cheek.

Why?

Because, so lurkers don't come over here and claim we are making shitty remarks. We always have a comments on line, with the tag and there is enough history of usage of the tag to prove our point.

That comment, serious or not, did not have a tag, so there is no way we assume it's all in good fun.

Now do you understand. Ding carefully, the world is watching.

711 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:59:30am
712 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:59:49am
713 Spare O'Lake  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 11:59:55am

re: #695 davesax

A few things, guys:
I've grown up since I posted here years ago. I don't take anything personally, and don't call anyone names. That's my credo.

Are you suggesting that we are immature, you dirty, violent slut?

714 monkeytime  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:00:13pm

re: #695 davesax

A few things, guys:

1. When I used to post here...years ago, it was a different dynamic because it was smaller and many of the frequent posters had met in person.

2. I don't think I have more credibility than anyone else simply because I'm an old timer.

3. It's just comments on a blog...and Charles has politely reprimanded me and I will respect his wishes.

4. I've grown up since I posted here years ago. I don't take anything personally, and don't call anyone names. That's my credo.

Now, can someone ATTEMPT TO SAY SOMETHING FUNNY? Man, I live in New York City. They're taxing ITUNES for G-d's sake, the subway service is getting worse, and they want to raise taxes. AGAIN.

I came here to unwind, not to start a hateful thread.

Can anyone make us laugh?

The subway service here in Texas sucks too. I always go to Quizno's.
/:>)

715 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:00:16pm

re: #705 rgranger

Maybe the guy failed to stop for a previous cop... you know, when you run from the cops, they don't give you a 2nd warning before putting out the spike strips.

So, the cop was sort of a living spike strip. Dipshit Did you watch the WHOLE video and read the WHOLE article?

716 Kailen  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:00:37pm

There may have been a legitimate reason for targeting that one specific cyclist. We can't tell from the video, but it is a possibility. I'm not going to jump on the "it's assault/brutality" bandwagon yet, but I'm not going to sing the cop's praises either, based on what little evidence we've been shown.

717 2by2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:00:55pm

#682
"NYC has awful cyclists, awful pedestrians, and awful drivers. (And yet I still like the place.) The traffic interaction among the three is like a Hieronymous Bosch painting at times."

Yes that's it, I'm living in Manhattan for 14 years now, and I had run ins as a pedestrian with motorists and cyclist, as a cyclist with motorists and pedestrians, as a motorist with cyclists and pedestrians.
This is the 5th largest city in the world, with a lot of tense people moving around and trying to get to their destinations the fastest way possible. Lot's of recklessness, so you're in it at your own risk.
That said, again that cop is a jerk and should not be on the force.

718 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:01:24pm

Hmmm...Dave Sax wants something funny. I have a story I have been trying to figure out how to put in writing for a time. If I fail to convert it, forgive me.

My husband is one of the many guys (and gals) who went out and bought a gun after the election.* The one he wanted wasn't available locally, so he bought it online. I knew how badly he wanted it, so it was fine with me; so little of what he makes he spends on himself. Anyway, the seller--a very nice man, as most gun people are-- tried to call him at work to get the credit card, but husband was in the lab, so he called here. We chatted about the purchase, he knew I was doing this for my husband. I gave him the card number, info, etc.

He said "Great. And the total will be..."

Long pause.

"Should I be telling you the total?"

Obviously, he has dealt with husbands and wives and guns before.

;)

719 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:01:27pm

re: #713 Spare O'Lake

?

720 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:02:37pm

re: #716 Kailen

There may have been a legitimate reason for targeting that one specific cyclist. We can't tell from the video, but it is a possibility. I'm not going to jump on the "it's assault/brutality" bandwagon yet, but I'm not going to sing the cop's praises either, based on what little evidence we've been shown.

Then why would the cop have to falsify his report...

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

If the cop had a "legitimate reason," there would be no reason to lie on the report, which was filed BEFORE the video became known.

Did you read the article that Charles linked to?

721 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:02:57pm

re: #711 buzzsawmonkey

Apple's new robot seeing eye dog is called the Seeing iDog™.

And, since it is mechanical, not live, it is guaranteed not to offend Muslims, so it will come in handy for blind people in the UK who want to go into restaurants.

cute name. A seeing idog? Not ?

722 HoosierHoops  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:03:15pm

re: #708 Outrider

Guy walks into a bar at the top of the Sears tower sits at the bar and orders a drink. The guy next to him tells him that they are so high up that if you fell the updraft would bring you right back up the building safe.
First guy says no way and the second guy says bet me 20 bucks and I'll jump. So he gives him 20 bucks and the guy jumps out the the window and sure enough the updraft brings him safely back into the bar.
The guy was astounded and had an idea to make some money. So he goes around and bets everyone in the bar 20 bucks each to jump.
So he jumps out the window and goes splat on the ground.
The Bartender looks at the first guy and says...Superman you are a mean drunk.

723 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:03:27pm

re: #680 davesax

And that being said, I'd appreciate if someone updated the dictionary about the use of GAZE.

It is done.

724 Spare O'Lake  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:03:33pm

re: #719 WriterMom

?

That was supposed to be funny - obviously you didn't think so.

725 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:04:40pm
726 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:04:52pm

The LGF dictionary is here, by the way:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

It's listed in the 'Tools/Info' menu.

727 Kailen  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:04:54pm

I read the article. But all that passage is what the DA is charging him with, and is not proof yet of wrong doing.

Accusations are thrown around rather freely. We still don't have evidence either way, so I'll withhold judgment either way.

728 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:05:20pm

re: #724 Spare O'Lake

No, GA. I hope we don't need a "joke" tag. I thought maybe you hadn't seen Davesax's apology.

729 Earth56  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:05:28pm

Dave Sax


Dumb New York Laws
A fine of $25 can be levied for flirting. This old law specifically prohibits men from turning around on any city street and looking "at a woman in that way." A second conviction for a crime of this magnitude calls for the violating male to be forced to wear a "pair of horse-blinders" wherever and whenever he goes outside for a stroll.

It is against the law to throw a ball at someone's head for fun.

A license must be purchased before hanging clothes on a clothesline.

The penalty for jumping off a building is death.

A person may not walk around on Sundays with an ice cream cone in his/her pocket.

While riding in an elevator, one must talk to no one, and fold his hands while looking toward the door.

Slippers are not to be worn after 10:00 P.M

730 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:05:34pm
731 lifeofthemind  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:06:12pm

re: #695 davesax

A few things, guys:

1. When I used to post here...years ago, it was a different dynamic because it was smaller and many of the frequent posters had met in person.

2. I don't think I have more credibility than anyone else simply because I'm an old timer.

3. It's just comments on a blog...and Charles has politely reprimanded me and I will respect his wishes.

4. I've grown up since I posted here years ago. I don't take anything personally, and don't call anyone names. That's my credo.

Now, can someone ATTEMPT TO SAY SOMETHING FUNNY? Man, I live in New York City. They're taxing ITUNES for G-d's sake, the subway service is getting worse, and they want to raise taxes. AGAIN.

I came here to unwind, not to start a hateful thread.

Can anyone make us laugh?

The Third People's Commisariate of Humor will consider your application

732 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:06:37pm

RTFA. The cop committed felonies by falsifying his report. That alone makes anything and everything he does exceedingly questionable.

733 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:06:40pm
734 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:07:03pm

Thanks Writermom, Thanos.

LOL Outrider.

My final comment on the biking occurence is this:

I in NO WAY support police brutality of any kind. A have no idea what this biker did before roll tape...but it's still wrong for a cop to go Guantanamo on a biker.

That being said...I'm NOT SURPISED AT ALL THIS HAPPENED. The biking situation in this city is really out of control. I've been hit three times. Last month, I saw a woman get hit buy a biker...and the biker just rode off.

Until some sort of laws are passed that hold city bikers accountable for passing red lights, speeding through crowds when people cross the street, etc., - like cab drivers are - we are in danger of someone snapping like this cop did.

I see this as part of a steady decline in the quality of life, here, that's also included the allowance of bikers with no mufflers to riding through Manhattan's streets during the summer and blowing out people's eardrums with no consequences, and people in SUV's blasting music so that windows rattle.

735 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:07:36pm

re: #730 ploome hineni

Punishing bad guys works for me in terms of policemen. Nursing-well they should want to nurse people back to health.

You should add social workers to that list. They are seriously effed up usually.

736 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:07:58pm

re: #710 Walter L. Newton

Respectfully, I was unaware.

737 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:08:39pm
738 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:08:58pm

re: #727 Kailen

I read the article. But all that passage is what the DA is charging him with, and is not proof yet of wrong doing.

Accusations are thrown around rather freely. We still don't have evidence either way, so I'll withhold judgment either way.

Ok, we do know...

1) The officer's report said Long steered into him and injured the officer
2) You watched the video (yes?)
3) We do not see any evidence of Long steering into the officer and it doesn't appear that the officer is hurt.

We certainly do have evidence. Granted, a judge or jury has not pronounced him guilty, but, there is nothing wrong with us looking at what WE have available and making an assumption.

When the OJ trail was in progress (the first one), did you not have any opinion until Ito slammed his gavel for the last time?

Am I missing something?

739 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:09:11pm
740 Spare O'Lake  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:09:19pm

re: #728 WriterMom

No, GA. I hope we don't need a "joke" tag. I thought maybe you hadn't seen Davesax's apology.

No I saw it and I wasn't bothered by his earlier comment either.
I don't know, some days I think people people take themselves far too seriously - me included.

741 JumpLandPackRepeat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:07pm

The officers' jobs are to maintain order...knocking that cyclist on his ear seems a bit counterproductive to that end. Sure, we all fantasize about doing things like that, but DAMN, you don't actually act on it! Two words: ANGER MANAGEMENT.

742 Outrider  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:17pm

re: #735 WriterMom

Punishing bad guys works for me in terms of policemen. Nursing-well they should want to nurse people back to health.

You should add social workers to that list. They are seriously effed up usually.

Jobs that used to be "callings" are now filled with people merely looking for income. Jobs like policeman, soldier, nurse, teacher, preacher, social worker, doctors, fireman, and there are a few others. Jobs that required an extra degree of dedication and ... caring about the actual profession itself and results.

743 davesax  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:20pm

Spare:

I liked your comeback.

OK, guys...I better get something done.

Charles, thanks for updating the dictionary.


It was good to see everyone at LGF again.

Keep the faith.

744 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:26pm

re: #740 Spare O'Lake

For sure. I'd like to erase that down ding then...

745 Occasional Reader  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:29pm

re: #726 Charles

The LGF dictionary is here, by the way:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

It's listed in the 'Tools/Info' menu.

lizardoid - a lizardoid is a devoted follower of and commenter on Little Green Footballs; it can refer to either gender. Further exploration of the "lizard" references can be found on the LGF FAQ. The first use of "lizardoid" on LGF was by Throbert McGee, 1/31/2003 11:01AM PST, though it did not refer to LGFers. The term acquired its current meaning from this classic posting [Charles, 11:02 AM PST].

Harrumph.

I continue to insist that the "lizard" meme originated with Yours Truly, in a post lost in the mists of time that linked to the famous Denver International Airport/reptilian aliens site.

746 2by2  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:37pm

re: #717 2by2

#682
"NYC has awful cyclists, awful pedestrians, and awful drivers. (And yet I still like the place.) The traffic interaction among the three is like a Hieronymous Bosch painting at times."

Yes that's it, I'm living in Manhattan for 14 years now, and I had run ins as a pedestrian with motorists and cyclist, as a cyclist with motorists and pedestrians, as a motorist with cyclists and pedestrians.
This is the 5th largest city in the world, with a lot of tense people moving around and trying to get to their destinations the fastest way possible. Lot's of recklessness, so you're in it at your own risk.
That said, again that cop is a jerk and should not be on the force.

forgot
...and then there are cab drivers , which are in a separate league of jerks

747 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:42pm
748 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:11:49pm

re: #737 Iron Fist


I was eight. My father stopped waiting so long with the younger kids. My youngest brother was four. Even my father thinks he might have been a bit young.

My father was also a scoutmaster, and many of the young men who were my friends he had also taught to shoot. In other words, they all knew a. he had guns, b. he had a machete (they had seen that, too) and c. I could shoot.

749 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:12:07pm

re: #736 Lincolntf

Respectfully, I was unaware.

Bullshit. Then what the hell did you think all this stuff was...

"/ /s :) ;) "

... just bad typing techniques.

You will find these "I made a joke" symbols (and more) peppered all over the threads. Are you telling me, honestly, that you never wondered what they were, didn't know what they were, didn't care what they were...?

750 NYCHardhat  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:12:28pm

Whatever happened to "To Protect and Serve" ?

751 turn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:12:53pm

re: #555 Sunlight

What a bunch of cranky people today. Maybe we forgot to eat breakfast...

Seriously! Work is less painful than watching lizards tearing themselves apart. It seems like everybody is out on one big Troll hunt or something. Davesax is right, we should lighten up a bit and get back to the days when sarc tags could be forgotten on occasion without the fear of getting burned at the stake. I'm afraid to say I agree withthe "groupthink and dingalong police" comment.

752 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:13:33pm

re: #745 Occasional Reader

I think you're right-it was IIRC, the thread where Charles was acused of being a fictional made-up UJA sock puppet...someone railed about "Charles" being the puppet of the UJA and the Jooos, and then C&F did their cartoon...

753 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:13:39pm

re: #750 NYCHardhat

Whatever happened to "To Protect and Serve" ?

It's turned to "Pop and Swerve."

754 bellamags  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:14:05pm

re: #750 NYCHardhat

Hey there hardhat. ; )

755 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:14:16pm

re: #751 turn

Seriously! Work is less painful than watching lizards tearing themselves apart. It seems like everybody is out on one big Troll hunt or something. Davesax is right, we should lighten up a bit and get back to the days when sarc tags could be forgotten on occasion without the fear of getting burned at the stake. I'm afraid to say I agree withthe "groupthink and dingalong police" comment.

People have been pissed ever since Obamanation became Futurous Infectus.

756 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:14:36pm
757 Aye Pod  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:16:44pm

re: #704 davesax

I can see the reason (one anyway) why the cop in that video wanted the job. He's an asshole who likes throwing his weight around and thinks the uniform gives him cover to do just that. Every police force will get ones like that - the important thing is to recognise and remove them as soon as they exhibit that sort of behaviour.

758 turn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:18:21pm

re: #755 maddogg

People have been pissed ever since Obamanation became Futurous Infectus.

I for one was relieved the election was finally over. O may be part of it but I've never seen it so bad as on this thread. Really, all this shit coming down with the economy, holiday season, corruptions, who knows what else has obviously got people on edge here.

759 Sean  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:18:43pm

All of my friends have good bike manners
We don't do critical mass crap. We obey traffic laws.
I raise money for MS, Children's Medical Center etc. with my bike.
Remember that when it's time to share the road with me, please.

I wish I could see the video. I can't comment on it yet.

760 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:19:52pm
761 rgranger  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:20:54pm

Walter, you are a big man behind a keyboard, probably with small penis syndrome. On the plus side, it makes your hands look big. What I have read is your comments and they don't impress me nearly as much as they impress you.

762 Spare O'Lake  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:21:24pm

re: #744 WriterMom

For sure. I'd like to erase that down ding then...

What's a down ding?/

763 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:22:13pm

re: #756 ploome hineni

lol consider who gets the big bucks, and respect in our society dedication will not pay your motgage or health insurance

I have to agree with you whole heartily on that. I do not find dedication or loyalty are traits that any employer wants from you anymore.

And I think I know why. Because the employer/employee relationship has become so isolated, and employer doesn't want anyone working for them who shows any sort of personal qualities.

It's become cold and hard. If you have a dedicated employee, and upper management says fire him, you may feel compelled to tell upper management what you think about that decision.

Well, we wouldn't want to do that. Am I making sense. Loyalty and dedication works both ways, and employers don't want to have to deal with that.

764 phoenixgirl  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:22:14pm

re: #695 davesax

A few things, guys:

1. When I used to post here...years ago, it was a different dynamic because it was smaller and many of the frequent posters had met in person.

2. I don't think I have more credibility than anyone else simply because I'm an old timer.

3. It's just comments on a blog...and Charles has politely reprimanded me and I will respect his wishes.

4. I've grown up since I posted here years ago. I don't take anything personally, and don't call anyone names. That's my credo.

Now, can someone ATTEMPT TO SAY SOMETHING FUNNY? Man, I live in New York City. They're taxing ITUNES for G-d's sake, the subway service is getting worse, and they want to raise taxes. AGAIN.

I came here to unwind, not to start a hateful thread.

Can anyone make us laugh?

well you certainly seem to have pissed off all the uptight people!

765 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:23:27pm

re: #761 rgranger

Walter, you are a big man behind a keyboard, probably with small penis syndrome. On the plus side, it makes your hands look big. What I have read is your comments and they don't impress me nearly as much as they impress you.

What are you, 12 years old? Go out into the school yard and put your tongue on the metal pipe. Ok.

766 maddogg  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:24:09pm

re: #758 turn

I for one was relieved the election was finally over. O may be part of it but I've never seen it so bad as on this thread. Really, all this shit coming down with the economy, holiday season, corruptions, who knows what else has obviously got people on edge here.

You mean like waking up without a job on Christams day?

767 SummerSong  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:24:19pm

Wow. Ol' Dave sure got the "highrise" from quite a few!
Karma weapons drawn, too.

Don't GAZE me bro...

768 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:27:34pm

re: #762 Spare O'Lake

I don't know...
/ / / /
/joke/
/sarc
HAHAHAHHAAHA

769 rgranger  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:28:48pm

No Walter, but you seem to only be able to communicate on a 3rd grade level with most of you comments containing some form of vulgarity. Hence my assumption that you have a small penis and smaller intellect. I think a large number here would agree. None of your posts have contributed to the conversation, if you thing that they have, that is your just being an idiot.

770 turn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:30:04pm

re: #766 maddogg

You mean like waking up without a job on Christams day?

That is certainly "what else" might be at play here. Myself included! One of the things I enjoy about LGF is you can always find humor here despite all the doom and gloom going on around us.

771 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:30:53pm

re: #770 turn

That is certainly "what else" might be at play here. Myself included! One of the things I enjoy about LGF is you can always find humor here despite all the doom and gloom going on around us.

No you can't.
/s

772 turn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:30:56pm

re: #768 WriterMom

I don't know...
/ / / /
/joke/
/sarc
HAHAHAHHAAHA


LOL, that's the type of humor I'm talking about!

773 turn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:32:23pm

re: #768 WriterMom

I don't know...
/ / / /
/joke/
/sarc
HAHAHAHHAAHA

You forgot the smiley face :.) Ha!

774 hazzyday  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:35:44pm

The video is missing all the preconditions. It just has the result. The cop should just get off with a light reprimand for not gathering adequate evidence. Anything you can judge about the cop being bad you can also judge about the bicyclist being bad. And given the reputation of the two groups, the cops come out far better than Critical Mass. Tie goes to the policeman.

The critical mass people want to create a mob behavior close to a riot and insulate any individual from personal responsibility. The behavior this prods the cyclists to is sub human. They will say this themselves on their websites. You will find them executing code pink/anarchist tactics when one of their own commits a crime. They swarm and try and confuse so the perp can get away.

If one of them does wrong encited by the mass actions of the group. Then this whole group is guilty. The cop himself is involved in the center of a maelstrom that his commanders didn't prepare him for adequately. Usually in these situations the police stand outside the riot lines and not singly wander inside them. Just bad urban tactics. Not the solo cops fault.

Critical Mass is a bad idea gone worse.

775 Lincolntf  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:37:31pm

Tags, dings, etc. I hate to say it, but some of you people have waa-aay too much time and judgment on your hands.

Do I put this / here to make it funny?

776 turn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:38:13pm

re: #771 Walter L. Newton

You gonna be alright Walter? I had quite a few other things to say to you but deleted them, I'm invoking the 24 hr rule. Lighten up please.

777 The Optimist  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:38:47pm

It could have been the other way. Shoes could have been thrown and the cop could have been run over.

778 hazzyday  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:44:42pm
779 harrylook  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:45:38pm

Ugh. Too bad I'm in on the discussion so late, but I just wanted to express the following. Part of my job involves defending cops and towns faced with excessive force civil rights claims. There is nothing more depressing and infuriating than a cop who thinks he can kick someone's ass for no good reason. I recently settled a case where a good cop got sued because he assisted a bad cop in an arrest. The bad cop, of course, never stepped forward to say he was the one who adminstered the beating, and the good cop, of course, wasn't about to ruin his career by selling out the bad cop.

780 Spare O'Lake  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:45:48pm

re: #775 Lincolntf

Tags, dings, etc. I hate to say it, but some of you people have waa-aay too much time and judgment on your hands.

Do I put this / here to make it funny?

Give up. You will never be funny.

781 WriterMom  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:45:56pm

re: #772 turn

{TURN} *SMOOCH*

/ / / / :)

;)

782 chukardog  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:49:28pm

we have no idea what the bicyclist was doing off camera. Im gonna go ahead and give the officer the benfit of the doubt. Having watched the WTO protests in Seattle first hand, My insticts tell me this was warranted and well deserved.

783 eschew_obfuscation  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 12:53:27pm

re: #751 turn

Seriously! Work is less painful than watching lizards tearing themselves apart. It seems like everybody is out on one big Troll hunt or something. Davesax is right, we should lighten up a bit and get back to the days when sarc tags could be forgotten on occasion without the fear of getting burned at the stake. I'm afraid to say I agree withthe "groupthink and dingalong police" comment.

Hear! Hear! A big upding to you!

784 Pietr  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:04:32pm

re: #758 turn

I've been afraid to post-in all seriousness. I'm a hatchling. But I decided to post a tongue in cheek way upthread-just b4 the thread went totally toxic. i'll look to see if I'm still here after this, but I was UPSET at seeing posters I respect attacked for defending one they've known a long while. I don't remember the 2 threads, but a long time friend of Sharmuta went over the line in #2,and got banned-and I'd updinged his initial post in the first thread. The post was exquisite in thread #1-the post in 2 was bad.

That said, this is the 'SEASON' for Christians, and Hannukkah is coming up before that. Can we sit back and look at posts without getting all hyper, IE reading into them? Remember "Peace on Earth, Good will to Men"? I realize LGF is constantly under scrutiny-but the TURDS will take stuff out of context anyway. I'm happy that reason prevailed today-but feelings were hurt, and egos bruised. Please, in the "Spirit of the Season", take a breath and ask for explanation before downdings and attacks. This forum is better than that, IMHO. That said, I'll sit out for a bit.

785 Mr Secul  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:06:15pm

re: #720 Walter L. Newton

Then why would the cop have to falsify his report...

"Morgenthau said Pogan falsified details in the criminal complaint and other paperwork related to Long's arrest, claiming Long steered his bike into the officer and injured him."

If the cop had a "legitimate reason," there would be no reason to lie on the report, which was filed BEFORE the video became known.

Did you read the article that Charles linked to?

Yes, he would have given the 'real' reason for his attack actions and we would have known his justification.

I suspect that the attack was not random. I think that the cyclist provoked the attack by being skinny and non-threatening. He looked like a victim and so became one.

/I wonder of he wears glasses.

786 Dustyvet  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:17:32pm

re: #140 gmsc

According to Code Pink, throwing shoes is only an "insult".

So, what if we went to the next Critical Mass bicycle protest and simply insulted them with shoes?

And Code Pink is a major insult!

787 Noam Chumpski  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:18:56pm

Well, that's not right. But it's kinda clear that that bicyclist wanted to push the envelope with his "cop fly-by." Still inappropriate. That other cop stand by quiet while the first cop falsified the report? That's pretty crappy as well.

In other news:
1. I really hate bicyclists who ride on busy, urban roads and act like they have "the same rights as cars" who then ride right through red lights... and who break every other traffic law that I can think of.

2. I think it's 'gay' to get dressed up in that skin-tight, professional, bike competition clothing (complete with logos) and show me your saggy, 45-year-old ass while I'm trying to get home through traffic.

What? Can't break that 'World Land Speed' record in some khaki shorts?

I don't need my 4 year old niece seeing that kind of perversion when I'm just trying to get her to day care.

788 Yashmak  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:26:26pm

re: #339 TheGrandMufti

The video does not tell the whole story. Let's here the other side. What the cyclist was doing before he entered the frame that made him a target for a police take down?

Obviously nothing to merit the charges Pogan tried to file against him. All the charges were dismissed, and Pogan indicted for filing false reports. That Pogan was only 3 weeks out of the academy at the time raises the chances that this was simply a case of a rookie officer losing his cool.

There's no excuse for what that video shows.

789 albusteve  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:27:00pm

re: #760 Iron Fist

Guns are pretty common where I live. All kinds of guns. One of the local gun shops had a .50 M2 semi-automatic with a couple of thousand rounds of ammunition for sale earlier this year for the modest sum of $24,000. It sold before I got a chance to go look at it.

I don't know what one does with an M2. It's a bit large for lawn sculpture. If I'd bought it (not going to happen. I couldn't sell my harley and make enough out of the deal to buy something like that), I wouldn't have a room in my house big enough to set the thing up.

I think it's great that we have that kind of firepower on the market. I wish I could afford it.

Wah

when I was a little tad the family was on vacation in DC...we went to Quantico to see their small museum...there was an M2 standing on tje floor and I played with it...pulling the bolt, rotating the barrel, fiddling with the butterfly trigger...way cool for an eight year old

790 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:30:14pm
791 Yashmak  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:31:32pm

re: #787 Noam Chumpski

That other cop stand by quiet while the first cop falsified the report? That's pretty crappy as well.

Agreed.

Given the other officer's sluggishness in following Pogan once Pogan singled out the rider for assault, it certainly seems to me like he didn't see a reason to take him down. Once Pogan has him on the ground, the other officer liesurely walks up and . . .helps? No. He just stands there. Obviously, the guy on the ground WASN'T resisting, or he would have helped Pogan restain him.

I hope for the good of the NYC residents that Pogan is summarily dismissed from the PD, since he's still in his probationary period.

792 Yashmak  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:44:17pm

re: #790 Radislav

@Pietr nice post and oh so true

last week I made one comment disagreeing with the topic and omg the commenting police swarmed on me like rabid lizards,

No offense Radislave, but you've got some pretty thin skin, if you think that was bad. I've received more negative dings for a single comment than you have in all your comments put together. I once made a comment so poorly worded it took me more than a dozen responses before I finally made it clear what I'd actually meant.

793 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:50:38pm

re: #790 Radislav

Banned twice before? Can't imagine why!

And with that, I bid you adieu for the third time.

794 Noam Chumpski  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 1:52:25pm

re: #793 Charles

Banned twice before? Can't imagine why!

And with that, I bid you adieu for the third time.

Oh my God, hilarious.

795 GreatDane  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 2:00:14pm

Those bikers are obnoxious and looking for a fight. They deserve every fist in the face they get.

796 Yashmak  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 2:08:58pm

re: #795 GreatDane

Those bikers are obnoxious and looking for a fight. They deserve every fist in the face they get.

maddog responded to this best in #10:

But if they can get away with doing it to that idiot they can get away with doing it to you.

If the police aren't required to comply with the laws they're supposed to enforce, there's be nothing stopping the police from being every bit as bad as the criminals they are supposed to protect us from.

797 Haverwilde  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 2:15:00pm

re: #695 davesax

A few things, guys:
Can anyone make us laugh?

re: #793 Charles

Re: 790
Banned twice before? Can't imagine why!

And with that, I bid you adieu for the third time.


There does that help. It sure gave me a chuckle!

798 Adrenalyn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 2:26:52pm

re: #774 hazzyday

your post makes the most sense of all herein

an upding for you !

799 blue_like_jazz  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 2:55:13pm
So don’t construe this as support for them... But...


wait a minute...

you mean that it's possible not to support a movement or organization but still identify with one of their grievances?

just checking.

800 charles_martel  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 3:00:18pm

The cop was way out of line and deserves punishment. It was clear assault by the cop. Living in NYC, I see a lot of illegal behavior by cops. They are not above the law.

801 Virginius  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 3:30:09pm

I'm going to let the jury decide it after hearing all the evidence. And whichever way they go will be fine with me.

That's why we have trials, and why I'm perfectly happy with O.J. Simpson's being not guilty of murder, yet guilty of armed robbery and kidnapping.

They were there, they saw and heard all the evidence. I wasn't. Gotta delegate that sort of thing.

802 yochanan  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 3:55:10pm

bike riders have to obey the law lots of them act like the law doesn't apply to them. trafic laws are there to keep everybody safe & to make $$$ .

how many times do you see bike riders going throgh stop signs and ridding on the sidewalk.

803 lostlakehiker  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 3:59:38pm

re: #53 rawmuse

Here is a little piece of advice, for what it is worth.
If you are in control of a moving vehicle and a cop (or any pedestrian, for that matter, but ESPECIALLY a cop) moves in front of you, headed for the sidewalk,

SLOW DOWN or better yet STOP.

The cyclist did NOT do that. That does not give the cop a pass, but the entire situation was avoidable by the application of a little ORDINARY COURTESY.

The situation was a clash of wills. The officer wanted to deck the rider. The rider wanted to proceed.

It was an unlawful demonstration. The rider is already deliberately breaking the law, like all the others, and wants to continue to do so. The cop is pissed because the rules of engagement, as evident in the behavior of the rest of the officers in both that video and the one posted by been21, are allowing all too many of the riders to slip by.

Ordinary courtesy does not make clashes of will go away. The cop was not "in front" of the rider. Up to the last moment, the rider might have rolled on by. In any ordinary civilian interaction, the rider and the pedestrian would have accommodated each other, adjusting their trajectories so as to mutually avoid a collision. My own preference as a rider is to aim at a point behind the pedestrian. The pedestrian, noting that my aim is not on a collision course with where he is, much less where he will be, proceeds in peace. And all is well.

A second choice is to steer a wide orbit around where the pedestrian will be. That was this cyclists choice.

But in the video, the officer maintains a collision course, and when the rider swerves, the officer steps up his pace.

The real problem here is not as much the violent takedown of the rider. It's not all that violent, and I trust that the rider came to no real harm. A rookie cop making a mistake (or deciding to break the rules because he's pissed) would be nothing new, and internal disciplinary procedures ought to straighten the guy out.

The big problem is the falsifying of the official report afterward. That's setting the stage for perjury at trial. It's not something that can be smoothed over. It puts the officer totally in the wrong.

804 yochanan  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 4:06:02pm

re: #13 Charles

You can see the cop zero in on the approaching rider, then position himself and shove him right onto the sidewalk. He could easily have killed that guy.

the same applies to people who ride bikes on sidewalks, I got hit by a college girl on a busy sidewalk one that was so busy and narrow that it is posted DO NOT PARK YOUR BIKE ON THIS SIDE WALK. after she hit me she did not even stop to see if I was ok.

some bike riders act like they are doing us a favor because they ride a bike.

OBEY THE LAW BIKE RIDERS stop means stop red light means stop, remember pedestrians in cross walks and sidewalks have the right of way you hit one and you are 100% at fault.
On a busy sidewalk right next to a retirement home (with a large sign saying no bikes on sidewalk) I have seen people riding a high speed 15-20 mph on the same sidewalk with old people. If you knock over an old lady more than likely she will break some bones and at that age it doesn't heal all that well you can even die from this.

805 lostlakehiker  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 4:07:54pm

re: #64 buzzsawmonkey

The cop clearly did wrong.

That said, New York cyclists routinely

1) Ride the wrong way, against traffic;

2) Ignore bike lanes;

3) Ignore traffic signs and traffic lights, and run lights with impunity;

4) Cut in front of other vehicles without warning;

5) Ride without lights or reflectors at night;

6) Wear dark clothing at night while riding without lights or reflectors;

7) Run down pedestrians, often when riding against traffic.

And they get called on NONE of this. No tickets. No arrests. No confiscations. Instead, the city gives them bike lanes which they don't use and--frankly--don't need, increasing the overall traffic congestion. And, unlike the motorists whose space they impinge on with the bike lanes, the cyclists pay absolutely no taxes or fees towards road maintenance.

Bicyclists don't hammer the road like motorists do. Every motor vehicle passing across a stretch of pavement does its own little bit of damage. The damage adds up, and then the road has to be fixed. That's the main reason we have gasoline taxes. The tax is proportionate, in a rough way, to the weight of the vehicle and the damage it does.

As to cyclists who don't use lights or reflective clothing at night, there is nothing the law can do to them one half so harsh as what reality will do. These riders are begging for a Darwin award. Now, readers, please don't get me wrong: whoever hits a nearly invisible night cyclist and sends him to his (Darwin) reward has incurred a passel of trouble for himself, and anyway, you don't really feel that this punishment fits the crime. Still, traffic tickets are a form of tough love for these cyclists, less punishment than education.

806 lostlakehiker  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 4:24:32pm

re: #639 karmic_inquisitor

The bike has breaks. I think every honest cyclists here will admit that they are not always used when "swerving around the pedestrian" seems like a workable plan.

The cyclist could have stopped for the cop.

Not defending the cop here - just pointing out that the cyclist was an ass hole too.

Agree to a point. The cyclist was being an asshole just by participating. But once you get to that point, it's a given that he's going to try to slide by the cops and avoid arrest. That was the pattern of behavior all along the route. The cops are sort of blocking the street, and the riders are sliding by somehow, though a few get caught.

807 yochanan  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 4:31:11pm

re: #806 lostlakehiker

the cops should have blocked the street with there cars and paddy wagons and arrested the whole lot of them.

808 yochanan  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 4:37:11pm

riding on the public road way means you accept the rules of said public road, i.e. 8 sided red signs mean stop, cross walks mean yield the right of way to people walking in them, side walks if you are older than the age of 12 are not for bikes.

cops should give tickets to bike riders who don't obey the law instead of ignoring it now unless there is a accident.

if bike riders can't obey the law maybe they should not be on high traffic roads.

809 yochanan  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 4:56:21pm

c.m. is a anarchist group, they should have blocked the street and arrested the whole lot of them.

in chicago there was a ride by this group that disrupted a near by hospital. what if someone died when they were being transported to the hospital it did not happen but i could have.

c.m. actions bother me a whole lot more than the cop.

810 fclass308  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 4:57:11pm

Looks to me that the little prick turned toward the cop.

Assault a cop, get your ass kicked.

811 Victory Gin For All  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 5:18:52pm

I suppose when Rodney King got the living shit beat out of him, you all were "Oh, that's just awful. The poor guy. Those damned rogue cops." Fuck that! I was cheering for them. 100 mph through residential neighborhoods.

But this one...not so much, only because the faggot on the bike is going to sue the city and make a few million. Piece of shit.

Yeah, yeah. Go ahead and down ding me. I'm hoping for a negative 25.

812 califleftyb  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 6:10:04pm

Here's my take on this: I've been stuck in a "critical mass swarm" in SF and I've seen the deliberate taunting and aggressive behavior by these a-holes on wheels who only have the guts to act that way because they are in a highly mobile mob. I'll bet every pedestrian and commuter would like to take a swing at one of these jerks but we just wait it out and put up with their crap. Now along comes a rookie cop who thinks he's a linebacker for the Giants, after two weeks on the force just itching to "get into the game" and show he can dish out some punishment; only the poor kid on the bike didn't know he was even in the game. Blame this one on the brothers in Blue culture. I've been around enough demonstrations to see how cops feed off each other to escalate the violence until someone when they least expect it gets a baton in the chops - happens all the time. This rookie cop thought it was expected of him to show his machismo and he let loose -- only someone on a bike just doesn't fit the profile of an allowable target, so he'll wind up with a long carrier as a mall guard.

813 Dustyvet  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 6:38:33pm

re: #783 eschew_obfuscation

Hear! Hear! A big upding to you!

"All I want for Christmas is my two front dings..."...:)

814 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 6:53:00pm
815 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 6:58:13pm
816 JacksonTn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 6:59:57pm

re: #815 shaker

Cops are thugs.

Tell that to the cop that comes to help you out next time you need one ...you are a jerk for saying that ...

817 yochanan  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:05:21pm

bikes don't pay for the road, motorists and trucks pay for it. so the next time a bike group acts like the road is there maybe they should have to pay a tax to use the road like motorists do.

by the way i don't drive and do use tax payer subsidized public trans.

818 gclaghorn  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:05:39pm

re: #815 shaker

Cops are thugs.

Ennnhhh...sorry, that's incorrect. But tell him what his consolation, prize is, Bob...

819 Yashmak  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:05:59pm

re: #814 Short Fat Corporal

point 1-
The people commenting here about the cop, and doing so based upon what the media says, are probably the same people that bought the stories that the media told about the Haditha Marines. The media is a bunch of cop and military hating garbage: believe anything they say at your will, but don't expect the rest of us to buy it.

I based my comments more on what I saw with my own eyes, and the opinion of his own department. . .which has suspended him.

Now, if the courts vindicate the cop, as they did the Marines, I'll be the first to say "My bad". But I'll be about as shocked if that happens, as I would be if Ron Paul had won popular vote for President.

820 yochanan  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:12:36pm

the vedio looked like a mob to me a mob on wheels. if the cop overreacted maybe he needed more training instead of being made the scapegoat.

821 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:12:36pm
822 Captain Amercia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:22:23pm

I'm just amazed at all the psycho analyzers, and mind readers on LGF. Apparently everyone is able to determine the police officers motivation for subduing the creep on the bike (And many attribute it to malevolence) with very limited video information showing just one side of the incident.

1)This rookie cop thought it was expected of him to show his machismo and he let loose -
2)The big problem is the falsifying of the official report afterward...
3)The situation was a clash of wills. The officer wanted to deck the rider...
4)In any event, this cop should be a)fired and b) tried for assault...

Wow. The lines just keep coming.
I guess we don't dare give the cops the benefit of the doubt given that the reputation of these mobs are confrontational to begin with.
I guess we don't know if the cyclist could have:
A) assaulted someone (Or whatever) up the block and other cops radioed to these two to apprehend him.
B) The Police Officer determined the guy wasn't going to stop and had to take him down without injuring himself.
C) The DA's office was inundated with threatening phone calls from his fellow assclown bike friends and the likes of the ACLU if they don't DO something about this cop.
D) if the Cop's report was substantively and provably FALSE or subject to arbitrary interpretation of a chicken sh*t DA.

We don't know. Most cops I know put up with a great deal of B.S. especially from asshats like these bike mob idiots. Every move they make is second guessed (Like this one) by people who couldn't change a diaper on a combative 2 year old yet complain when the police do societies dirty work.
I will reserve judgment on this one because as in baseball the "Tie goes to the runner".

823 phoenixgirl  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:33:04pm

re: #822 Captain Amercia

I'm just amazed at all the psycho analyzers, and mind readers on LGF. Apparently everyone is able to determine the police officers motivation for subduing the creep on the bike (And many attribute it to malevolence) with very limited video information showing just one side of the incident.


Wow. The lines just keep coming.
I guess we don't dare give the cops the benefit of the doubt given that the reputation of these mobs are confrontational to begin with.
I guess we don't know if the cyclist could have:
A) assaulted someone (Or whatever) up the block and other cops radioed to these two to apprehend him.
B) The Police Officer determined the guy wasn't going to stop and had to take him down without injuring himself.
C) The DA's office was inundated with threatening phone calls from his fellow assclown bike friends and the likes of the ACLU if they don't DO something about this cop.
D) if the Cop's report was substantively and provably FALSE or subject to arbitrary interpretation of a chicken sh*t DA.

We don't know. Most cops I know put up with a great deal of B.S. especially from asshats like these bike mob idiots. Every move they make is second guessed (Like this one) by people who couldn't change a diaper on a combative 2 year old yet complain when the police do societies dirty work.
I will reserve judgment on this one because as in baseball the "Tie goes to the runner".

as a former college softball player and high school, slow pitch b, c and d league umpire...there is no such thing as a "tie base".

824 Captain Amercia  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 7:36:54pm

Figure of speech eh'.

825 phoenixgirl  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 8:04:34pm

re: #824 Captain Amercia

Figure of speech eh'.

it's a family tradition to correct it when it's uttered. more of a joke.

another one...is "who's winning?" no one, you are ahead or behind, you win or lose. i could go on but i don't want to expose my insanity

826 ornery elephant  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 8:26:40pm

Well, it sure looks to be damning evidence against this policeman - now, I would guess his defense may be that he saw this bicyclist do something illegal out of camera range but I would guess that him stopping and putting his hand up for the guy to stop would be normal procedure - I'd rather wait to see what he says is his reason for the action.

The worst thing about this whole incident is the attention this will give these morons and numbnuts from Critical Mass - if the MSM, amateur videographers and the world would ignore these juvenile demonstrations, they'd one day put an end to them.

827 Cheeseland  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:06:13pm

From the youtube abc clip
Officers Statement
"...the defendant steered the defendant's bicycle in the direction of [Officer Pogan] and drove defendant's bicycle directly into [his] body, causing [the officer] to suffer lacerations on [his] forarms."

Officer Pogan is not on the street though while the incident is investigated.

828 zombie  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:08:34pm

I haven't had the chance to read all the comments, but I will say this:

I've been at and observed my fair share of Critical Mass rides and incidents. In case not everyone knows this, let me make one thing perfectly clear:

Critical Mass is not, I repeat NOT, a group that promotes "bicycle rights." It may have started out as such, but sometime in the last decade they were incrementally (and then totally) taken over by the most radical elements in the group. They changed.

Critical Mass is now an anti-police activist group which uses bicycles as props.

They exist for one reason only, and that is to martyr themselves, to fling themselves into maelstroms that they have created, so that they can hopefully get hurt -- best of all by a policeman -- so that they can then capture the whole thing on film, and use that film to discredit the police.

The goal of any Critical Mass ride now is to get injured somehow, so as to claim the status of "victim." If the injury comes at the hands of a citizen, then the police can be blamed for not protecting the Critical Masser. But the ultimate dream injury comes at the hands of the police, because then the police can be blamed directly.

This happens in the Bay Area all the time, and in cities all around the country. Don't be fooled into this this was an isolated incident, or was unplanned or un-hoped-for.

I can't vouch for the details of what is shown on the video, only to say that the cop played directly into their hands. Whether or not he is guilty of assault, whether or not he was goaded into his action, he did exactly what they wanted -- knock over a bicyclist on film. You can guarantee that video will be played and replayed ad infinitum for years to come.

So, yes, perhaps the cop shouldn't have gotten his feathers ruffled by them, and shouldn't have knocked the guy off the bike, but really, folks, don't express any "sympathy" for the Critical Massers -- they got exactly what they had come for. They are happy as clams. The guy who got knocked over is now a folk hero. He's the happiest of all.

829 zombie  Wed, Dec 17, 2008 9:10:00pm

this this = thinking this

830 Wendya  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 12:11:50am

re: #468 Honorary Yooper

You think knocking over a person on a bicycle is fun? You think potentially killing the guy is fun?

Be gone, troll.

The cop was completely in the wrong. He was in uniform representing the city and he needs to accept responsibility for what he did.

That said, but I've encountered CM before and some of them deserve to be clotheslined. If I behaved in my vehicle the way they do on their bikes, I'd lose the privilege of driving. They need to be held to the same standard. I obey traffic rules on my bike, they can do the same or suffer the consequences of their irresponsible and dangerous actions.

831 Fluffster  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 12:57:04am

Woha. This guy is 3 weeks out of the academy? Good thing that mobile travesty was nipped in the bud.

Why did the other cop not arrest the thug?

832 tntb  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 6:38:07am

Look, we all know that CM is a bunch of jerks, out to hold up rush hour traffic.

In this case, it doesn't matter.

The cop assaulted the rider, then falsified the report. For those of you who keep wringing your hands while saying "but, but, but, we haven't heard the cop's side of the story", you need to consider that we have his side of the story in a falsified police report. If the rider had committed some crime off camera, don't you think he would have mentioned that in his report? Instead, he claimed that the rider tried to hit him.

He's scum. His buddy who helped him is scum. Minimally, he has assaulted someone under color of law, falsely arrested them (tantamount to kidnapping), falsely charged them, then falsified the report. His buddy is guilty of same by not stopping him after witnessing the assault. Were it not for youtube, the bicyclist would be convicted of a crime where he was a victim and we'd never hear about it.

The cop-worshippers here might want to think hard about that last statement. How many people are sitting in jail right now for crimes that were created from whole cloth by the police?

833 A.W.  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 7:18:31am

If his lawyer was smart, he would have a defense. He could say that his client was moving off of the road, and rather than stopping and being careful, this cyclist choose to come close to him. So concerned he was about to be run over, he knocked him down.

I don't know if that is the truth or not. but that is a decent defense.

834 so.cal.swede  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 8:46:22am

the cop had forward momentum after the impact, meaning he was pushing hard through the bicyclist. looking at the tape, he's looking and aiming for that guy before he even enters the frame.

but what did the bicyclist do to get the cop's attention?

835 Yashmak  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 9:13:46am

re: #833 A.W.

If his lawyer was smart, he would have a defense. He could say that his client was moving off of the road, and rather than stopping and being careful, this cyclist choose to come close to him. So concerned he was about to be run over, he knocked him down.

I don't know if that is the truth or not. but that is a decent defense.

It might be, if it weren't for the video which makes it pretty darn obvious his aim wasn't to get off the road, it was to knock over the rider.

836 A.W.  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 9:42:20am

Its not that obvious to me. yeah, he was looking off camera, but the answer to that is, he was looking to make sure he wouldn't be run down.

Truth me, it is so easy to say that the things we didn't see justifies what we did see.

I ain't pro-brutality, of course, but this tape is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in unjustified brutality.

837 A.W.  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 10:13:31am

let me clarify my last sentence... this tape, by itself, is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in unjustified brutality. That means they will have to build the rest of the case, probably in part by talking to the other cop.

838 Charles Johnson  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 10:49:50am

re: #836 A.W.

Its not that obvious to me. yeah, he was looking off camera, but the answer to that is, he was looking to make sure he wouldn't be run down.

Truth me, it is so easy to say that the things we didn't see justifies what we did see.

I ain't pro-brutality, of course, but this tape is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in unjustified brutality.

Oh please. Watch the full tape, including the slow motion version, and it's completely obvious that he intentionally put himself in the way of the bicycle in order to knock the guy down. He even takes a couple of big steps right before hitting the guy, because the rider tries to swerve to avoid the cop when he sees what's coming.

I can't imagine anything that could possibly give that cop a justification for doing what he did. Verbal abuse is not a justification for violence.

839 txleadfoot00  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 11:27:31am

re: #286 WrathofG-d

Even if that were true, the cop could've stopped and subdued the subject without throwing a body block. That officer was showing his ass, and the court needs to kick it.

840 gulfloafer  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 12:14:05pm

That was almost as good as when Ryan Clark sized up Wes Welker ... almost.

841 gulfloafer  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 12:18:02pm

re: #838 Charles
Charles, I've watched the replay 10 times now. Clearly it was not helmet-to-helmet contact.

842 Mr Secul  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 12:44:30pm

re: #832 tntb

The cop-worshippers here might want to think hard about that last statement. How many people are sitting in jail right now for crimes that were created from whole cloth by the police?

I updinged you before I saw the cop-worshippers part. I don't like that phrase so I was tempted to down ding.

843 tntb  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 3:02:44pm

Mr. Secul, I invite you to read many of the posts above, such as the one which Charles replied to, which unthinkingly take the cop's side and claim that surely something must have necessitated this.

We have a problem in this country of dirty cops, what you see here is just a tiny bit of it. The problem is made worse by the enablers who assume that all cops are good.

844 Daisy  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 5:00:33pm

re: #8 turn

It's going to be really hard to talk his way out of this, knocked the guy on his ass plain as day.

I wish I could agree w/you since your thinking reflects your possession of a basic sense of right and justice. Unfortunately, I can't. The cop won't have to "talk his way out of it" .. this kind of police abuse and much much worse abuse - have been captured on tape; not only does absolutely nothing happen to the cops involved, but the victims are endangered if they go up against the police. (Look at the other cop on the tape - he automatically gives the other cop a pass - watching his back, as it were, against 'outsiders') .

I know this is not a popular sentiment here at LGF, but I believe the police are out of control and should not be allowed to conduct their own 'internal investigations' - which almost always have them coming up smelling like roses.
The worst case scenario of their version of 'justice' for themselves too often amounts to being suspended w/pay.

There are far too many police (at least in NY state) and it seems to me that many of them are involved in class warfare; they hate the rich and poor equally and seem only equipped/inclined to deal fairly w/other blue collar workers. Since I'm not a blue collar worker, I mainly experience the police (in general) as at least a nuisance and at times as a threat.

In no way do I think these critical mass Moonbats are anything less than deliberately obnoxious. But obnoxious is one thing, brutality w/full pay - at my expense- is quite another.

845 nodeengineer  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 5:58:09pm

Anyone at lgf - Charles Johnson included - who thinks they can determine or at the very least infer guilt or innocence of the PO from one video is pathetically mistaken. I was a Transit cop in NY (when there was a Transit PD) and from personal experience I will state that you cannot ascertain guilt or innocence without a complete statement of fact. The cop was indicted and depending on the make up of the jurors, he could have been at a disadvantage. Juries have been known to render idiotic decisions because they hate cops.

Before Mr. Johnson condemns the Officer based on one video from one angle without context; without a determination of events before the incident; without a transcript of verbal communications - he should be more circumspect before an unfounded opinion is placed on a high traffic website.

The case will go to trial and the Officer will have his day in court.

846 nodeengineer  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 6:10:46pm

Correction: the Officer was charged, not indicted.

847 tntb  Thu, Dec 18, 2008 8:04:54pm

nodeengineer - quick question. If the officer really was in the right, why did he falsify his report and claim the cyclist attacked him?

You - and the others here like you - seem to be forgetting that he wrote up a false report afterward. No reason to do that if there were circumstances that required him to assault the cyclist.

848 jaybird  Fri, Dec 19, 2008 7:41:52am

Both officers shown had their attention drawn to and then fixated upon this one cyclist amongst the approaching many. Find the reason why and you'll know why he was singled out and given the howdy-do. There's more here than meets the eye in this little snippet.

849 tntb  Fri, Dec 19, 2008 9:10:46am

Right, jaybird. So, if there's more to it, why did they falsify the report? Why did they neglect to mention this other reason and instead fabricate a false report about the cyclist trying to hit the officer?

The real question is this: why do you folks not just admit that he's a dirty cop?

850 Cain  Fri, Dec 19, 2008 11:11:18am

Wow, that was brutal. Maybe when that cop gets out of jail, the Raiders can sign him for their back field. Would be a huge improvement.

851 Yashmak  Fri, Dec 19, 2008 1:13:47pm

re: #843 tntb

Mr. Secul, I invite you to read many of the posts above, such as the one which Charles replied to, which unthinkingly take the cop's side and claim that surely something must have necessitated this.

We have a problem in this country of dirty cops, what you see here is just a tiny bit of it. The problem is made worse by the enablers who assume that all cops are good.

While I agree with you, it's also important to recognize that there are just as many folks who believe the opposite. . .that MOST cops are brutal facists. . .which is of course, untrue.

re: #848 jaybird

Both officers shown had their attention drawn to and then fixated upon this one cyclist amongst the approaching many. Find the reason why and you'll know why he was singled out and given the howdy-do. There's more here than meets the eye in this little snippet.

It didn't look like that to me. To me, it looks like the one cop singled out the rider in question, and the other officer responded to his partner's moves. The video is a bit blurry, but his movements look more like he's simply following the tackler cop, not zeroing in on the rider. In fact, the second cop actually turns away, and briefly looks the opposite direction down the street when the tackler initially starts trying to head-off the bicyclist. That's about as far from 'fixating' on the bicyclist as he could have been.

852 nodeengineer  Sat, Dec 20, 2008 6:37:06pm

tntb wrote:

You - and the others here like you - seem to be forgetting that he wrote up a false report afterward. No reason to do that if there were circumstances that required him to assault the cyclist.

A probable cause arrest is not a conviction. In order to prove your assertion - or in this case your uninformed theory - you are required to cite a complete statement of facts and the evidence. You can't? Don't have access to them?

QED.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Quenching the fire of the oppressed.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

MikeySDCA
China Is Culturally Superior to America - the Atlantic Wire
26 minutes ago
Views: 15 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

researchok
'I Was Looking Forward to a Quiet Old Age': Instead, Etta Shiber, Helped Smuggle Stranded Allied Soldiers To Freedom
5 hours, 57 minutes ago
Views: 75 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 0

Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
13 hours, 38 minutes ago
Views: 110 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
14 hours, 31 minutes ago
Views: 127 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Michael McBacon
Kansas governor signs 'Shariah bill' to ban Islamic law
19 hours, 1 minute ago
Views: 239 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
1 day, 19 hours ago
Views: 460 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 0 • Rating: -5

MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
1 day, 20 hours ago
Views: 231 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Ascher
Israeli Who Saved Turk on Everest: You Never Abandon a Friend - Israel News, Ynetnews
1 day, 21 hours ago
Views: 302 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 3

Haywood Jabloeme
The Harrassment of Patterico & Its Roots in Left-Wing Activism
1 day, 21 hours ago
Views: 525 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Curt
Brian Banks: (Video) Falsely accused of rape speaks out
2 days ago
Views: 277 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

 Frank says:

The people of your century no longer require the service of composers. A composer is as useful to a person in a jogging suit as a dinsoaur turd in the middle of his runway. -- from the Them Or Us The Book