LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

Saddleback Church Deletes Page on Creationism and Homosexuality?

Religion | Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:58:43 pm PST

Rick Warren, the Saddleback Church pastor chosen by Barack Obama to deliver the invocation at the presidential inauguration, has been getting a lot of media attention because he’s a very vocal opponent of gay marriage. Panda’s Thumb points out that Warren is also a creationist: Creationist to Give Invocation at Inauguration.

Oddly enough, the FAQ page at the Saddleback Church that contained their policy statements on dinosaurs, evolution, and homosexuality (among other subjects) has suddenly been wiped clean: Saddleback Church: Small Group Information.

But Google’s cache has a copy as it appeared on December 16, 2008.

On dinosaurs:

What about dinosaurs?

Question: How do they fit in with the idea that God created the world rather than the world evolving on it’s own? Why doesn’t the Bible talk about dinosaurs?

Answer: The Bible tells in Genesis 1 that God made the world in seven days, and that he made all of the animals on the fifth day and the sixth day. All of the animals were created at the same time, so they all walked the earth at the same time. I know that the pictures we all grew up with in the movies were that dinosaurs roamed a lifeless, volcanic planet. Remember these are just pictures drawn by someone today! The Bible’s picture is that dinosaurs and man lived together on the earth, an earth that was filled with vegetation and beauty.

What happened to the dinosaurs? The scientific record lets us know that they obviously became extinct through some kind of cataclysmic event on the earth. Many scientists theorize that this may have been an asteroid striking the earth, while many Christians wonder if this event could have been the worldwide flood in Noah’s day. No one can know for certain what this event was.

Although it cannot be stated with certainty, it appears that dinosaurs may have actually been mentioned in the Bible. The Bible uses names like “behemoth” and “tannin.” Behemoth means kingly, gigantic beasts. Tannin is a term that includes dragon-like animals and the great sea creatures such as whales, giant squid, and marine reptiles like the plesiosaurs that may have become extinct. The Bible’s best description of a dinosaur-like animal is in Job chapter 40. We don’t know for certain if these are actually dinosaurs or are some other large creatures that became extinct.

This should not sound so strange. After all, God tells us that he created all the land animals on the sixth day of creation, the same day that he created mankind. Man and dinosaurs lived at the same time. There was never a time when dinosaurs ruled the earth. From the very beginning of creation, God gave man dominion over all that was made, even over the dinosaurs.

“For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day.” Exodus 20:11

“All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made that was made.” John 1:3

“Look at the behemoth, which I made along with you and which feed on grass like an ox. What strength he has in his loins, what power in the muscles of his belly! His tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are close-knit. His bones are tubes of bronze, his limbs like rods of iron. He ranks first among the works of God.” Job 40:15-19 (NIV)

On evolution:

Is evolution part of God’s plan?

Question: Why is it not OK for evolution to be part of God’s plan? I don’t understand what the problem is: couldn’t God have used the process of evolution as the way that he created the earth?

Answer: When I was a new believer in Christ, I had some very strong feelings about the issue of evolution. Much as you have expressed, I believed that evolution and the account of the Bible about creation could exist along side of each other very well. I just didn’t see what the big argument was all about. I had some friends who had been studying the Bible much longer than I had who saw it differently. But they didn’t push me or argue with me, they simply challenged me to take some time to look into the facts and study the issues carefully. I’ll always appreciate them for that, because this was an issue that I had to really think through. Eventually, I came to the conclusion, through my study of the Bible and science, that the two positions of evolution and creation just could not fit together. There are some real problems with the idea that God created through evolution.

I would encourage you to take some time to study this issue. I found that, although I’d understood the science side of the equation, I needed to take some more time to read what the Bible really had to say about this subject. Not having taken the time to really read the Bible, I was very ignorant about what it had to say. Let me give you one example. I discovered that the problem of sin, as addressed in the Bible, was much more serious than I had previously thought. When I realized that the world was clearly a perfect place as God created it, and that this perfection was ruined by the sinful choice of Adam and Eve, it really started me thinking. Did the Bible teach evolution or did it teach the creation of a first man and woman named Adam and Eve? If we evolved, which human being would have made the choice that brought sin into this world? If Adam and Eve were just allegorical pictures, why did the New Testament place some much importance upon them as responsible and real individuals? Since God clearly says that it is our sin that brought death into our world, how could there have been death for billions of years before the arrival of the first man who sinned on the earth? As I asked questions about this issue and studied what the Bible had to say, I found it to be one of the greatest times of learning in my life as a new believer. My prayer is that you will have this same experience!

“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Gen. 1:1

“Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.” John 1:3

If you want to study this further...
Here’s a web site that you might want to check out:
http://www.probe.org/content/section/13/67/ (One article that is especially thought provoking discusses “Darwin’s Black Box”).

And on the issue of the day, homosexuality:

What does the Bible say about homosexuality?

The Bible very clearly says that homosexuality is a sin.

“Homosexuality is absolutely forbidden, for it is an enormous sin.” (Lev. 18:22 TLB)

“Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes, nor homosexual offenders, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor slanderers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” (1 Cor 6:9-11 NIV)

While all sin is destructive, Romans 6 warns us of the great dangers in sexual sin when it says, “Run away from sexual sin! No other sin so clearly affects the body as this one does. For sexual immorality is a sin against your own body.” (1 Cor 6:18 NLT) This includes not only homosexuality, but all sexual immorality: adultery, sex without marriage, pornography. We must not act as if homosexuality is the only serious sexual sin, and we must not act as if homosexuality is not a serious sexual sin.

I’ve heard it asked, “Isn’t being homosexual something that a person is physically born with?” First of all, there are absolutely no facts to support this claim. From time to time studies have been reported in the news that seemed to indicate this, but every one of these studies has proven to be wrong. Secondly, even if some physical difference were discovered, it would be no excuse for sin. We know that some people can develop a stronger physical addiction to alcohol than others, but that’s obviously no excuse for living an alcoholic lifestyle.

Finally, a word about being judgmental. It’s not judgmental to say that what the Bible calls a sin is a sin, that’s just telling the truth. Not being willing to talk to someone caught up in sin, or not believing that they can be forgiven, or thinking that you are not just as much in need of Jesus as they are ... that’s being judgmental.

Because membership in a church is an outgrowth of accepting the Lordship and leadership of Jesus in one’s life, someone unwilling to repent of their homosexual lifestyle would not be accepted at a member at Saddleback Church. That does not mean they cannot attend church – we hope they do! God’s Word has the power to change our lives.

In equal desire to follow Jesus, we also would not accept a couple into membership at Saddleback who were not willing to repent of the sexual sin of living together before marriage. That does not mean this couple cannot attend church – we hope they do! God’s Word has the power to change our lives.

UPDATE at 12/22/08 6:31:46 pm:

For the record, a then (L) - now (R) screenshot of the top of the page:

Advertisement

777 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 fat bastard vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 3:59:24pm

Even churches have memory holes.

2 mean Gene  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:01:59pm

Good for Google saving this.

I liked this paragraph:

While all sin is destructive, Romans 6 warns us of the great dangers in sexual sin when it says, “Run away from sexual sin! No other sin so clearly affects the body as this one does. For sexual immorality is a sin against your own body.” (1 Cor 6:18 NLT) This includes not only homosexuality, but all sexual immorality: adultery, sex without marriage, pornography. We must not act as if homosexuality is the only serious sexual sin, and we must not act as if homosexuality is not a serious sexual sin.


Why would he delete it?

3 Cathypop  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:04:12pm

re: #2 mean Gene

Good for Google saving this.

I liked this paragraph:

Why would he delete it?


So now sex is bad?

4 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:04:12pm

re: #2 mean Gene

Good for Google saving this.

I liked this paragraph:

Why would he delete it?

Pandering, maybe?

5 wrenchwench  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:05:54pm

It's like Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease of the website! Or maybe that's what they hope we will think....

6 ggt  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:08:26pm

Hello Lizards! You know the weather in Near Iowa, no need for me to report it.

I understand politicians trying to throw webpages down the memory hole, but a preacher? Didn't we go thru this with Rev Wright?

7 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:08:30pm
8 rawmuse  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:09:16pm

FTA: " Man and dinosaurs lived at the same time. "
Gosh, I hope not. Can you imagine having to contend with a Velociraptor? or a herd of them?

9 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:09:23pm
10 Cathypop  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:09:34pm

That does not mean they cannot attend church – we hope they do! God’s Word has the power to change our lives.

Yeah, attend church and oh by the way give us a donation. I really hate these churches that do not give a rats ass about the people but only the money going to them. This is what makes me hope there really is a God and he has a SPECIAL place for these jackasses!

11 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:09:39pm

Looks like Rick Warren is a student of the Obama webmasters. I'm guessing the next thing we'll find out is how his website has completely inadequate security.

12 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:10:01pm

re: #1 fat bastard vegetarian

Even churches have memory holes.

Is this any surprise. I don't believe in anything but evolution, and I don't care about gays or gay marriage, so I have no dog in this fight, but, here we go, another person, with a position, giving in or whatever.

These people, all of them, politicians, mega-church leaders, CEO's, they are all way out of touch with the regular folks.

13 cagney  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:10:06pm

The News of the World newspaper is a sensationalist UK rag and isn't the most accurate of papers but they have an article about MI5 agents going undercover in UK prisons to keep an eye on Islamic radicals:

[Link: www.newsoftheworld.co.uk...]

"SPY chiefs are putting undercover officers into Britain’s jails to monitor Islamic radicals thought to be recruiting terrorists.

There are almost 10,000 Muslims in Britain’s jails— with 90 of them serving time for terror offences.

Now ministers have been warned action is necessary to spot future extremist ringleaders and suicide bombers.

It is the first time MI5 has put terror spies into jails. In the past they have relied on listening bugs and police informers. But now they fear more and more young lags are being converted and radicalised in prison.

A Whitehall source said: “You are talking about rootless young men at the bottom of society. They’re in jail and someone gives them some purpose. That’s fine if we are talking about moral direction, not if it leads them to jihad.”

In top-security jails such as Whitemoor, Cambs, 35 per cent of inmates are Muslim—and they have converted numerous other prisoners to Islam."

14 ggt  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:10:35pm

re: #7 buzzsawmonkey

First of all, "behemoth" is the Hebrew plural of "behema," which means "large beast." Today it is usually applied to cattle, water buffaloes, and the like.

The Israeli student who got in trouble a few years ago at Penn State for supposedly calling some loud black sorority sisters "water buffaloes"--this fell afoul of the Penn State hate-speech code--was merely translating from Hebrew to English.

As far as the quote from Leviticus above is concerned, it is totally wrong. The Torah nowhere refers to "homosexuality," only to homosexual acts--and a case can be made that the condemnation was originally directed at such acts being done in furtherance of idolatry (there were certain cults in ancient times which conducted homosexual orgies as part of their worship rites). I don't know enough about the New Testament to comment on those translations, but the mistranslation of the "Old Testament" doesn't give me confidence.

Exactly. I was taught as an RC, that it is not who we are, but what we do that is is sinful. In other words, verbs, not nouns are sinful.

15 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:10:44pm

re: #1 fat bastard vegetarian

Even churches have memory holes.

heh...didnt they invent them?

16 winston06  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:10:59pm

interesting

17 anduril3019  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:11:03pm

I'm generally a supporter or Warren's and appreciate his willingness (previously) to clearly state what he believes. Many Christians believe a lot of stuff that sounds pretty wacky, not just the creation issue, but it's definitely cheezy to try and hide it from the masses.

18 Cathypop  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:11:41pm

re: #17 anduril3019

I'm generally a supporter or Warren's and appreciate his willingness (previously) to clearly state what he believes. Many Christians believe a lot of stuff that sounds pretty wacky, not just the creation issue, but it's definitely cheezy to try and hide it from the masses.

It's what the O wants him to do.

19 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:12:11pm

re: #2 mean Gene

Good for Google saving this.

I liked this paragraph:

Why would he delete it?

and without even explaining their point of view...sissies

20 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:12:14pm
21 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:12:26pm

This just confirms my suspicions about Rick Warren. He is nothing more than an opportunist who is more concerned about his pocketbook and image than spreading the message of Christ.

22 reggie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:12:41pm

Hey, now! Ricky W went to a lot of trouble trying to alter his image for the big event. Seems kinda selfish to dig through the trash and reprint these pages he threw away.

Expect charges of copyright infringement in 3, 2, 1...

23 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:13:06pm

Giving Christianity a bad name.™

...

I'll stick with Pope Benedict, and John XXIII.

24 Bloodnok  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:13:47pm

I believe that the whole Q&A was wiped within hours of Charles' post yesterday as some lizards were talking about some of the answers . I'm not saying the events were linked, but there you are.

From yesterday #402

25 fat bastard vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:13:58pm

re: #12 Walter L. Newton

Thought no one would ever read that page. I like Warren. Seems like a decent fellow, gives a bunch of money away and stuff....

Stand for what you believe in. Taking down a section of your website to make things a little more convenient smells a little... Philistine.

Wonder if Rick said, "Take all of that down" or some well meaning staff person thought, "I'll take this down for a few days. No one will notice."

26 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:14:15pm

re: #20 buzzsawmonkey

That would have worked, then and now.

27 goddessoftheclassroom  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:14:44pm

re: #21 Jetpilot1101

This just confirms my suspicions about Rick Warren. He is nothing more than an opportunist who is more concerned about his pocketbook and image than spreading the message of Christ.

You are very much mistaken.

28 itellu3times  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:15:00pm

Their web site is an evolving homosexual dinosaur.

29 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:15:04pm

re: #27 goddessoftheclassroom

You are very much mistaken.

How so?

30 fat bastard vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:15:18pm

re: #23 Ojoe

Giving Christianity a bad name.™

...

I'll stick with Pope Benedict, and John XXIII.

Oh, people hate them too.

31 nyc redneck  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:15:39pm

wow, his own beliefs under the bus. who is he? what does he believe?
he is now sanitized and ready for his close-up.
how pathetic.

32 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:15:46pm

re: #30 fat bastard vegetarian

Of course.

33 Cathypop  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:16:09pm

re: #23 Ojoe

Giving Christianity a bad name.™

...

I'll stick with Pope Benedict, and John XXIII.

Me to.

34 goddessoftheclassroom  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:17:51pm

re: #25 fat bastard vegetarian

Thought no one would ever read that page. I like Warren. Seems like a decent fellow, gives a bunch of money away and stuff....

Stand for what you believe in. Taking down a section of your website to make things a little more convenient smells a little... Philistine.

Wonder if Rick said, "Take all of that down" or some well meaning staff person thought, "I'll take this down for a few days. No one will notice."

We don't know who wrote the articles or if they were sanctioned by Rev. Warren. We don't know who decided to delete them. Rev. Warren has built a HUGE ministry and is already a fixture on the national stage.

35 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:17:59pm

re: #31 nyc redneck

wow, his own beliefs under the bus. who is he? what does he believe?
he is now sanitized and ready for his close-up.
how pathetic.

This is exactly what I was thinking!
I wonder how long it will be before a new and improved version of his "faith" is published?

36 fat bastard vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:18:29pm

re: #32 Ojoe

Of course.

Makes me sad.

37 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:19:21pm

Yesterday I was part of a thread discussing ethical behavior and propounded the value of religious faith in establishing it. Guys like this (the answer giver) are an embarassment!

38 fat bastard vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:19:43pm

re: #34 goddessoftheclassroom

Precisely.

39 rawmuse  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:19:47pm

Charles must feel like Sisyphus. :)

40 goddessoftheclassroom  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:19:51pm

re: #29 Jetpilot1101

How so?

You are judging this man on a a few pages deleted from a web page, I have been familiar with his work for several years. He lives as he believes, and he is not compromising that.

If he cared what the world thought of him, he would not be the leader he is.

41 fat bastard vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:20:53pm

re: #34 goddessoftheclassroom

I am all over the place on this. Why's it down? Dunno. Why was it up? Dunno.

I will toss out only this one absolute.

Rick Warren is a better man than I am.

42 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:20:59pm

re: #38 fat bastard vegetarian

Precisely.


I think you should be able to expect that if it is on HIS church's site, it has HIS tacit approval...

43 nyc redneck  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:20:59pm

this kind of behavior is truly the mark of an opportunist.
these vanished principles were ones he once believed.
and suddenly he does not?
it's creepy.

44 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:21:48pm
45 Rexatosis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:21:49pm

Warren, Wright, Ayers, Blago,...just temporary props in the Obama show to divert the attention of the audience before being discarded in the trash off-stage. The real questions are what will be Obama's policies? Questions neither being asked of the President-Elect nor answered.

46 Cathypop  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:21:52pm

re: #40 goddessoftheclassroom

You are judging this man on a a few pages deleted from a web page, I have been familiar with his work for several years. He lives as he believes, and he is not compromising that.

If he cared what the world thought of him, he would not be the leader he is.

The more I read about this man the more he sounds like a very good salesman. And a good salesman does not always buy what he sells.

47 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:22:10pm

I think i will avoid this thread.
thank g-d there is football tonite
go BEARS.

48 fat bastard vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:22:33pm

See y'all in the morning.

49 goddessoftheclassroom  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:22:33pm

re: #47 yochanan

[Link: www.youtube.com...]

I think i will avoid this thread.
thank g-d there is football tonite
go BEARS.

I'll join you.

50 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:22:42pm

re: #41 fat bastard vegetarian

I am all over the place on this. Why's it down? Dunno. Why was it up? Dunno.

I will toss out only this one absolute.

Rick Warren is a better man than I am.

why do you say that?

51 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:22:47pm

re: #40 goddessoftheclassroom

You are judging this man on a a few pages deleted from a web page, I have been familiar with his work for several years. He lives as he believes, and he is not compromising that.

If he cared what the world thought of him, he would not be the leader he is.

He deletes pages from his website because he got some push back on them; seems a little linguine spined to me. I'm sure he does live what he believes. If this is the case then why run from it when Barney Frank calls you a bigot.

Because he does care what the world thinks of him, he deleted those pages.

52 96RoadKing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:23:02pm

re: #20 buzzsawmonkey

Too bad Warren's church couldn't have achieved a synergy and posited that the dinosaurs died out because they were gay.

The 'gay dinosaur' theory won't work...the antismoking lobby blamed the dieoff on tobacco years ago (or was that just a cartoon...I'm so forgetful when my brain gets frostbite)

53 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:23:04pm

The Vatican website - it is pretty consistent.
Vatican Web site

54 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:23:06pm

re: #41 fat bastard vegetarian

I am all over the place on this. Why's it down? Dunno. Why was it up? Dunno.

I will toss out only this one absolute.

Rick Warren is a better man than I am.

Don't sell yourself short.

55 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:23:17pm

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.

56 Cathypop  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:24:13pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.

because it is not good for the great O

57 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:24:20pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.

he's in someones pocket

58 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:24:34pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.

Maybe mainstream Christian is going the way of the dinosaur?

59 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:25:01pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.

Right on. There is nothing earth shattering here. Why delete the pages if the vast majority of Christian Churches agree with you?

60 wrenchwench  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:25:31pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.

They're removing dust particles. I hope the lighting is good.

61 nyc redneck  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:25:57pm

re: #35 reine.de.tout

This is exactly what I was thinking!
I wonder how long it will be before a new and improved version of his "faith" is published?

probably soon. they seem to make it up as they go along.
didn't society used to have, at least, 'implied' rules against this kind of devious
behavior ?
is there such a thing a lying anymore? or truth?

62 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:26:03pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.


I'm a Catholic, which makes me a mainstream Christian, I think, and I'm fairly certain that the parts about the dinosaurs and evolution would not be agreeable to the Catholic church.

63 jacksontn  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:27:09pm

re: #55 Killgore Trout

Why would they hide the page? This is all pretty mainstream Christian stuff and there's nothing particularly outrageous there.

Obama and Warren ...different book covers ...same story inside ...books make money ...

Both came to popularity by their books ...seems like they would rather lie or lie by omission when the truth would do ...but the truth always comes out ...

It's not like he is scrubbing anything most didn't already know about him ...but then maybe there is more to it than that ...who knows ...

64 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:27:12pm

re: #61 nyc redneck

probably soon. they seem to make it up as they go along.
didn't society used to have, at least, 'implied' rules against this kind of devious
behavior ?
is there such a thing a lying anymore? or truth?


all ye know and all ye need to know is beauty is truth, and truth is beauty

65 96RoadKing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:27:46pm

re: #58 Wishing

Maybe mainstream Christian is going the way of the dinosaur?

Doesn't history refute that idea? During difficult times (and we certainly appear to be looking into the abyss at this time) Faith makes a strong comeback. Although there may be some question as to what 'mainstream Christian' currently is (Catholic? Lutheran? Episcopalean? Unitarian? There's so many...TAKE NO CHANCES--JOIN THEM ALL!)

66 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:27:59pm

I would say he is half right

ducks.

67 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:28:05pm

Its crap like this that makes me give any church a wide berth. I'll keep my faith between me and God.

68 anduril3019  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:28:13pm

re: #58 Wishing

Jesus never really was much of a mainstream kinda guy.

69 rawmuse  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:28:38pm

I have a feeling that there will be some reform brewing in the mainstream Protestant movement soon. Declining attendance in the pews can't go on forever.

70 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:28:50pm

re: #68 anduril3019

Jesus never really was much of a mainstream kinda guy.


AMEN!

71 jemima  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:29:24pm

Well. He's crackers, isn't he.

72 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:30:03pm

re: #69 rawmuse

I have a feeling that there will be some reform brewing in the mainstream Protestant movement soon. Declining attendance in the pews can't go on forever.

neither can declining revenue...

73 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:30:16pm

I am decidedly out of the loop, believing neither that Jesus was born on Christmas, nor that he resurrected on Easter.
Things are just getting harder. Rick Warren hiding stuff in the memory hole doesn't surprise me at all.
If you have nothing with dying for, you have nothing worth living for.

74 MikeySDCA  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:30:40pm

What is it with Bambi and slimy preachers? The content of the site is pefectly defensible as a statement of one school of Christian thought. Why delete it? That's slimy.

75 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:30:51pm

re: #61 nyc redneck

probably soon. they seem to make it up as they go along.
didn't society used to have, at least, 'implied' rules against this kind of devious
behavior ?
is there such a thing a lying anymore? or truth?

You know, when I've seen Rick Warren on TV interviews, he has always semed to me to be a man who is sincere in his beliefs. We honestly don't know why he took those pages down; there may be perfectly reasonable explanations. But is sure does seem odd that the pages would have been removed just now. I guess we'll need to compare these archived pages with whatever replaces them to see how sincere Warren is.

76 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:30:55pm

re: #68 anduril3019

Jesus never really was much of a mainstream kinda guy.

Agree, 10000%

77 Nylecoj  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:31:08pm

re: #1 fat bastard vegetarian
post from last thread

RE: #192 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Oh yeah. Your mom was a looker!

Thank-you Sir!
I always think my folks look like movie stars in that photo.
I am told I look just like her, although that gets said now that she is 70. Hmmm :)

78 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:31:11pm

OT, but hilarious:

Is Obama Osama?

79 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:31:13pm

re: #58 Wishing

I'd like to see them give up the anti-scince and anti-gay stuff but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon. I'd be very surprised if they were embarrassed by what was on their web site.

80 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:31:44pm

re: #69 rawmuse

I have a feeling that there will be some reform brewing in the mainstream Protestant movement soon. Declining attendance in the pews can't go on forever.

Rick Warren is the first to capitalize on the declining attendance by writing a self-help book with religious overtones. Makes people feel all warm and fuzzy when they play church thinking they are achieving a goal. Oh and if you can't understand certain stuff, just chalk it up to faith. I stand by my assertion that Rick Warren is an opportunist at heart. He may have been a committed Christian at one point but somewhere along the road, fame and fortune became more important that being a servant which is what Jesus commands.

81 96RoadKing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:31:49pm

Sorry Lizards...this stream is just getting too depressing for me.

I think I'll join the footballers and see if Green Bay can pull one off in the Windy City.

82 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:31:57pm

re: #62 reine.de.tout

But among evangelicals and Pentecostals this is garden variety stuff. Very common.

83 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:32:28pm

The problem many Christians have with evolution is that evolution does not appear to agree with what is written about the origins of things in the Bible. They feel if they do not take these words as literal truth that somehow they are affirming that part of the Bible is untrue and have somehow betrayed their faith. This is primarily a problem in those churches that believe in the modern and un-biblical doctrine of Sola Scriptura, that Scripture alone is competent to guide someone to salvation. While I believe the Bible to be true, I have no problem with some parts being written in poetical, allegorical, symbolical ways that may be pointing at a truth beyond the literal meaning of the words. That said, I am not thereby given the right to simply discard the historical interpretations of those scriptures if they trouble, embarrass, or confuse me. It may well be that the writer of Genesis, Moses, was trying to explain evolution in the words he wrote to the Hebrews (the Hapiru in ancient Egyptian manuscripts?).

Unless one adheres to Sola Scriptura as a central doctrine of the Christian faith and feels that accepting Evolution somehow betrays that doctrine, it seems to me that whether there is or isn't evolution in nature is an extremely minor marginal issue in Christianity.

84 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:32:34pm

a web site isn't written in stone, they change pages get moved etc.
frankly i think your making a mountain of a mole hill.

85 Cicero05  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:33:22pm

re: #23 Ojoe

Giving Christianity a bad name.™

...

I'll stick with Pope Benedict, and John XXIII.

Try Pius XII on for size.

86 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:34:12pm
87 freedombilly  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:34:45pm

Cue up Hole, Memory.

88 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:35:23pm

re: #84 yochanan

a web site isn't written in stone, they change pages get moved etc.
frankly i think your making a mountain of a mole hill.

Deleting pages speaks to the deeper issue of character. Mountain or molehill, he could have kept the pages up and stood up to the flack he was getting. Either way, he was going to get hammered by the left. Now he is going to get hammered by evolutionists and scientists for trying to hide his true colors. Seems like by trying to hide the truth he brought down more heat on his head.

89 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:35:26pm

re: #85 Cicero05

Try Pius XII on for size.

Pius was to Urban for me, but the I'm an Innocent...

90 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:36:01pm

I'm surprised they do seem to offer comunion but this is new to me....

When and how often should we observe the Lord's Supper?
Jesus never said when or how often believers should observe the Lord's Supper. He instituted it on a Thursday night.

Thrusday? Huh.

91 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:36:09pm

Warren has every right to believe this stuff. As long as he remains a fundamentalist pastor, it doesn't bother me.

If he seeks to ban the teaching of evolution in public schools, or attempts to impose his beliefs upon others through fraud or deceit, then I would oppose him. People who believe that the Bible is literally true in every detail, and who reject evolution, cannot understand modern biology, genetics, or medicine. That's sad for them, and sadder for their children, who never will have a career in those important disciplines.

92 nyc redneck  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:36:40pm

re: #84 yochanan

a web site isn't written in stone, they change pages get moved etc.
frankly i think your making a mountain of a mole hill.

do you find it odd that what he removed is exactly what would be objectionable to the O and his friends?
i would have preferred that if he really believed this stuff he would have the strength of his convictions to defend it, at least.
it just seems that he has capitulated so quickly. that is not an admirable trait.

93 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:36:55pm

re: #90 Killgore Trout

I'm surprised they do seem to offer comunion but this is new to me....


Thrusday? Huh.

It was Passover, for pete's sake!

94 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:36:57pm

re: #88 Jetpilot1101

Deleting pages speaks to the deeper issue of character. Mountain or molehill, he could have kept the pages up and stood up to the flack he was getting. Either way, he was going to get hammered by the left. Now he is going to get hammered by evolutionists and scientists for trying to hide his true colors. Seems like by trying to hide the truth he brought down more heat on his head.


Same deal as recent discussions about Obama/ Blago, Nixon & Watergate- the coverup is usually worse than the transgression.

95 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:37:18pm

re: #94 revobob

Same deal as recent discussions about Obama/ Blago, Nixon & Watergate- the coverup is usually worse than the transgression.

Bingo!

96 Cicero05  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:37:27pm

re: #89 revobob

Pius was to Urban for me, but the I'm an Innocent...

That's Hilarius.

97 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:37:38pm

re: #93 Wishing

It was Passover, for pete's sake!


Is Passover always on a Thursday?

98 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:38:34pm

re: #97 Killgore Trout

Is Passover always on a Thursday?

No: the Feasts are figured using the sun and moon to determine the date...since it is primarily lunar, it is a different day each year

99 badbear  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:38:40pm

re: #67 Kragar (proud to be kafir)

Its crap like this that makes me give any church a wide berth. I'll keep my faith between me and God.

big thumbs up...both paws.

100 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:38:43pm

re: #96 Cicero05

That's Hilarius.


Well, I am a Leo!

101 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:38:53pm

re: #79 Killgore Trout

I'd like to see them give up the anti-scince and anti-gay stuff but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon. I'd be very surprised if they were embarrassed by what was on their web site.

Killgore, come on, embarrassed, no, he was more concerned what kind of splash back this whole thing is going to have on him. My goodness, he was picked by the Messiah.

As a typical mega-church pastor, we wee here that he is probably more concerned with his public image than his real mission, his ministry, his dedication to his Christians beliefs.

He's taking a dive, throwing the game.

102 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:38:56pm

re: #97 Killgore Trout

Is Passover always on a Thursday?

Passover begins on the 15th day of the month of Nisan, which corresponds to the full moon of Nisan, the first month of the Hebrew calendar, in accordance with the Hebrew Bible.[2] Passover is a spring festival, so the 14th of Nisan begins on the night of a full moon after the vernal equinox. To ensure that Passover did not start before spring, the tradition in ancient Israel held that the 1st of Nisan would not start until the barley is ripe, being the test for the onset of spring.[7] If the barley was not ripe an intercalary month (Adar II) would be added. However, since at least the 12th century, the date has been determined mathematically.

Doesn't seem to me that it would always fall on a Thursday.

103 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:39:21pm

re: #97 Killgore Trout

Is Passover always on a Thursday?

Besides, for *three days and three nights* to be fulfilled required that he die on Wednesday.

104 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:39:25pm

re: #7 buzzsawmonkey

First of all, "behemoth" is the Hebrew plural of "behema," which means "large beast." Today it is usually applied to cattle, water buffaloes, and the like.

The Israeli student who got in trouble a few years ago at Penn State for supposedly calling some loud black sorority sisters "water buffaloes"--this fell afoul of the Penn State hate-speech code--was merely translating from Hebrew to English.

As far as the quote from Leviticus above is concerned, it is totally wrong. The Torah nowhere refers to "homosexuality," only to homosexual acts--and a case can be made that the condemnation was originally directed at such acts being done in furtherance of idolatry (there were certain cults in ancient times which conducted homosexual orgies as part of their worship rites). I don't know enough about the New Testament to comment on those translations, but the mistranslation of the "Old Testament" doesn't give me confidence.

The Living Bible (TLB) is a paraphrase, not an actual translation. The New International Version (NIV) is a recent (20 years old) translation by Evangelicals. I do wonder about the lack of consistency when quoting from translations/paraphrases. At least they tell which ones they are using.

105 jacksontn  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:39:53pm

Some at dailyidiots think they are winning (their words not min) the issue by him taking it down ...

106 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:40:04pm

Pulling down his website isn't going to help Warren. It wouldn't surprise me if Obama, or someone from Obama's organization, requested that the controversial web pages be flushed down the memory hole. We're going to see much more of that during the Obama Administration.

This guy may challenge Big Brother for the title.

107 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:40:04pm

re: #20 buzzsawmonkey

Too bad Warren's church couldn't have achieved a synergy and posited that the dinosaurs died out because they were gay.

Case closed.

108 twincitiesgirl  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:40:24pm

Count me confused on this one. It seems it would be easier to take it down temporarily than hire extra staff to answer all the email such "information" is sure to provoke. Obama has already angered many gay groups by his selection of Warren and maybe they were anticipating some type of massive email campaign from disgruntled Obama supporters.

I don't know Warren personally of course, but both he and his wife have done much good in this world. He doesn't care what people think of him and is definitely not opportunistic or a phony.

It seems premature and intolerant to rush to judgment on something without knowing all the facts.

109 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:40:47pm
110 Cicero05  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:40:54pm

re: #100 revobob

We've got to stop all this Papal Bull.

111 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:41:08pm

re: #107 Occasional Reader

Case closed.

LOLOL

112 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:41:45pm
113 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:42:23pm

re: #109 buzzsawmonkey

With the lunar calendar, though, there's a greater variation in spread.

Calumny! That's an outrageous schmear!

114 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:42:25pm

re: #102 Jetpilot1101

Doesn't seem to me that it would always fall on a Thursday.


Bear in mid that trhe barley was often for beer, and "the barley was ripe" could refer to the beer being ready for festive consumption- if they got a little confused about which day it was, well who among us hasn't?
//

115 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:42:26pm

re: #109 buzzsawmonkey

Well, same day of the (Hebrew) month, but the day of the week differs from year to year, just as with holidays on the solar calendar. With the lunar calendar, though, there's a greater variation in spread.

Sorry: I should have said 14 Nisan every year, thanks for ceorrection.

116 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:43:10pm

re: #101 Walter L. Newton

I'm not so sure of that. I don't know what's going on. It would make sense if Obama was going to join his church and become his personal pastor but he's just officiating the swearing in ceremony. It's not like they're going to develop a personal relationship. .....or maybe they are.

117 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:43:31pm

re: #108 twincitiesgirl

Count me confused on this one. It seems it would be easier to take it down temporarily than hire extra staff to answer all the email such "information" is sure to provoke. Obama has already angered many gay groups by his selection of Warren and maybe they were anticipating some type of massive email campaign from disgruntled Obama supporters.

I don't know Warren personally of course, but both he and his wife have done much good in this world. He doesn't care what people think of him and is definitely not opportunistic or a phony.

It seems premature and intolerant to rush to judgment on something without knowing all the facts.

Why does he have to answer "all the emails?" If what was on his website was his belief, than there is no good reason to "hide" that, to remove it, even for a short period of time.

If that's his position, he doesn't have to answer to anyone.

118 badbear  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:43:44pm

re: #89 revobob

Pius was to Urban for me, but the I'm an Innocent...

ref Urban...preaching a crusade against Islam resonates warmly with me.

119 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:43:50pm

re: #116 Killgore Trout

I'm not so sure of that. I don't know what's going on. It would make sense if Obama was going to join his church and become his personal pastor but he's just officiating the swearing in ceremony. It's not like they're going to develop a personal relationship. .....or maybe they are.

egad..maybe barry's gay?

120 wrenchwench  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:44:21pm

re: #116 Killgore Trout

I'm not so sure of that. I don't know what's going on. It would make sense if Obama was going to join his church and become his personal pastor but he's just officiating the swearing in ceremony. It's not like they're going to develop a personal relationship. .....or maybe they are.

Maybe Warren is being run up the flagpole, so to speak.

121 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:44:46pm

re: #108 twincitiesgirl

I don't know Warren personally of course, but both he and his wife have done much good in this world. He doesn't care what people think of him and is definitely not opportunistic or a phony.

Jimmy Carter has done a lot of good in this world (Habitat for Humanity) but I consider him a phony and an opportunist.

122 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:44:49pm

re: #120 wrenchwench

That's a possibility.

123 Killian Bundy  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:44:52pm

Of course man walked with dinosaurs. What's the matter with you people?

/don't you watch the TV?

124 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:45:05pm

Maybe Warren wants to step into Billy Graham type shoes?

125 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:45:06pm

re: #116 Killgore Trout

I'm not so sure of that. I don't know what's going on. It would make sense if Obama was going to join his church and become his personal pastor but he's just officiating the swearing in ceremony. It's not like they're going to develop a personal relationship. .....or maybe they are.

He took it down. For what ever reason, he decided not to stand by his beliefs. Something's not right.

126 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:45:14pm

re: #110 Cicero05

We've got to stop all this Papal Bull.


I'll do vat I can, but these pun sessions take on a life of their- sometimes even an afterlife!

127 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:45:21pm

re: #108 twincitiesgirl

. . .

It seems premature and intolerant to rush to judgment on something without knowing all the facts.

It's true we don't know the reasons why this happened just right now.
But we do know the timing of it, and timing of it suggests something is odd.

128 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:45:26pm

re: #13 cagney

Fascinating, but relevant to the topic of the thread, how?

129 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:45:44pm

re: #124 Wishing

Maybe Warren wants to step into Billy Graham type shoes?

I don't think anyone right now could fill those shoes.

130 twincitiesgirl  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:45:53pm

re: #117 Walter L. Newton

That's why I said I was confused, it seems out of character for him. However, since I don't know why it was done I can only speculate.

131 mfarmer1  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:46:00pm

I see. So a big asteroid hit Earth and all the dinosaurs croaked but we made it? Okey dokey. Geesh, no wonder the Obama crowd is in a tizzy over this nutjob. It's bad enough going down the freeway knowing that one out of the nine drivers around you doesn't think we landed on the Moon, and now I have to deal with the fact that a few more out of that same bunch honestly believes man dined on Brontosaurus burgers? That alone should be reason enough to deny driver licenses.

132 wolfie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:46:02pm

re: #91 quickjustice

They reject macro-evolution. They do not reject adaptation or modern genetics. They are not necessarily "anti-science" anymore than someone who accepts evolutionary theory is necessarily "anti-God."

Your statement that they cannot master medicine is, quite frankly, stupid.
Just because that meme is endlessly repeated in anti-creationist circles does not make it true.

133 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:46:09pm

re: #127 reine.de.tout

It's true we don't know the reasons why this happened just right now.
But we do know the timing of it, and timing of it suggests something is odd.

Just the fact that it's gone suggests something.

134 Cicero05  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:46:28pm

re: #121 Jetpilot1101

Jimmy Carter has done a lot of good in this world (Habitat for Humanity) but I consider him a phony and an opportunist.

He gets his picture taken with a hammer in his hand each year. Good for him. Oh, and as President he brought lasting peace to the Middle East.

135 twincitiesgirl  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:46:46pm

re: #121 Jetpilot1101

That's your choice, but I would never equate the two.

136 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:47:20pm

re: #118 badbear

ref Urban...preaching a crusade against Islam resonates warmly with me.


And I think he was the one who said kill them all, God will know his own- my kinda guy

137 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:47:20pm
...while many Christians wonder if this event could have been the worldwide flood in Noah’s day. No one can know for certain what this event was.


I'm sure a T-Rex would have been real popular on board the ark. I'm not even sure how a Brontosaurus would fit? Small wonder Noah left them to fend for themselves. ;-)>
/

138 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:47:43pm

re: #129 Jetpilot1101

I don't think anyone right now could fill those shoes.

Billy is still alive, so you are right. But Warren may be positioning himself?

139 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:47:48pm
140 cagney  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:47:52pm

re: #128 Alberta Oil Peon

Apologies. Should have put on post that it was off topic.

141 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:47:54pm

re: #133 Walter L. Newton

Just the fact that it's gone suggests something.

it suggests the Obots got to him and he scrubbed...it's typical...there simply is no other explanation...the dood was compromised...c'ya Rick

142 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:48:21pm

In "ABOUT FUCKING TIME" News:

Defense officials: Drop in rocket attacks won't stop Gaza op

A senior Hamas official in the Gaza Strip told The Jerusalem Post that Egypt had relayed the message Sunday night. He said that Egyptian intelligence chief Gen. Omar Suleiman had contacted Hamas leaders there and in Damascus and urged a halt to the attacks so as not to give Israel an excuse to launch a massive military operation.

"The Egyptians told us that Israel is planning to assassinate a number of Hamas leaders," the official said. "They advised us to do something to calm the situation before it's too late."

Way fucking past too late. Good hunting.

143 CapeCoddah  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:48:22pm

Huffpo slammed for content theft:
[Link: blog.wired.com...]

144 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:48:38pm
145 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:48:54pm

re: #134 Cicero05

He gets his picture taken with a hammer in his hand each year. Good for him. Oh, and as President he brought lasting peace to the Middle East.

let us not forget Zimbabwe. (Rhodesia)

146 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:49:14pm

re: #138 Wishing

Billy is still alive, so you are right. But Warren may be positioning himself?

He may be but I don't think he'll have quite the following that Graham had. I think his son will carry on his father's legacy. Rick Warren can't touch genuine no mater how many presidents invite him to bless their inaugurations.

147 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:49:19pm

re: #132 wolfie

Hey, stupid is as stupid does, Wolfie, but I very respectfully suggest that with genetics rapidly becoming the centerpiece of modern medicine, ignorance of genetics will disqualify anyone who seeks to become a competent physician.

And it's stupid of you to suggest that ignorance of genetics isn't disqualifying in modern medicine.

148 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:49:37pm

re: #104 David IV of Georgia

spilling one's seed is forbidden, not just in gay sex but in masturbation and oral sex as well.
the Torah clearly says the gay sex act is forbidden.

the problem i have is they want us to say it is OK which i will not do the most i can do is ignore them, but this is hard when they demand attention. for example when gay activists disrupt religious activities that we feel are holy or important.

149 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:49:43pm
150 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:50:16pm

The First Easter or Pascha was on the 14th of Nisan. IIRC, Churches founded by St. John the Apostle celebrated Easter on that date. Churches founded by Sts. Peter and Paul celebrated Easter on the Sunday following the 14th of Nisan. After a few hundred years of inconsistent practices, in the First Ecumenical Council, the Council of Nicea (325 AD) decided that the church of Alexandria Egypt would set the date of Easter every year. Later, after Rome was estranged from the Eastern Churches, Rome decided to follow its own dating for Easter.

151 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:51:18pm

re: #121 Jetpilot1101

Jimmy Carter has done a lot of good in this world (Habitat for Humanity) but I consider him a phony and an opportunist.

Yup, he does what my two high school dropout neighbors do for a living. Swings a hammer framing houses. Going to take more than that to atone for his sins.

152 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:52:08pm

re: #150 David IV of Georgia

In the Western church, Easter falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the first day of spring. In the Eastern Church, it falls a week later.

153 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:52:13pm

I'm going with what Penn Jillette says, if you truly believe that stuff, then it's cruel of you not to proselytize, so essentially Pastor Rick is being cruel by his own measure for political convenience.

154 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:52:13pm
155 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:52:30pm

re: #150 David IV of Georgia

The First Easter or Pascha was on the 14th of Nisan. IIRC, Churches founded by St. John the Apostle celebrated Easter on that date. Churches founded by Sts. Peter and Paul celebrated Easter on the Sunday following the 14th of Nisan. After a few hundred years of inconsistent practices, in the First Ecumenical Council, the Council of Nicea (325 AD) decided that the church of Alexandria Egypt would set the date of Easter every year. Later, after Rome was estranged from the Eastern Churches, Rome decided to follow its own dating for Easter.

Incorrect: the early assemblies celebrated PASSOVER, not some pagan thing.
Sorry.

156 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:52:30pm

re: #144 ploome hineni

so
touts

are you blond yet?

No..
but I'm no longer gray LOL.

You doing OK?

157 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:52:47pm

re: #145 Outrider

let us not forget Zimbabwe. (Rhodesia)

Let me clarify, Carter was a complete failure as a president and his policies were abysmal. He still has done some good but he has done so because he is an opportunist. I think Rick Warren does a lot of good but I don't think his motives are pure; hence opportunist. Some would argue that Rick Warren's teachings are tearing Christianity apart (Emergent Church doctrine).

158 Racer X  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:53:01pm

re: #134 Cicero05

Oh, and as President he brought lasting peace to the Middle East.

You laugh but they gave him a medal. Arafat too.

I hear the unicorns and rainbows are plentiful in the middle east now.

159 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:53:38pm
160 Cicero05  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:54:08pm

re: #158 Racer X

You laugh but they gave him a medal. Arafat too.

I hear the unicorns and rainbows are plentiful in the middle east now.

Carter and Arafat will be together again soon.

161 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:54:13pm
162 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:55:08pm

I might add: in 325CE it became ILLEGAL for *christians* to have any dealings with Jews.
So much for the Messiah, eh?

163 thor  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:55:29pm

Who cares.

This is America and those people are entitled to their religion and religious beliefs. We can disagree with their belief system, but the Constitution entitles them to it.

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

164 badbear  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:55:38pm

re: #142 Kragar (proud to be kafir)

In "ABOUT FUCKING TIME" News:

Defense officials: Drop in rocket attacks won't stop Gaza op

Way fucking past too late. Good hunting.

The Israelis seem to have figured out that they're all alone for the foreseeable future, so no more of the land for peace swindle we've been forcing on them. I hope they elect Bibi Netanyahu and get on with it. Perhaps someone in the modern world remembers that what you do with an enemy is kill him.

165 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:55:56pm

re: #157 Jetpilot1101

Let me clarify, Carter was a complete failure as a president and his policies were abysmal. He still has done some good but he has done so because he is an opportunist. I think Rick Warren does a lot of good but I don't think his motives are pure; hence opportunist. Some would argue that Rick Warren's teachings are tearing Christianity apart (Emergent Church doctrine).

He could be an opportunist. I suspect he is doing self penance.

I consider Warren a false preacher, but that is only my opinion. Christianity is too strongly grounded for him to tear it apart. There have been "preachers" of his ilk around for centuries.

166 jacksontn  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:11pm

Is the part about you can attend Rick Warren's church if you are gay ... but cannot be a member if you are gay still there? ...

167 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:25pm

re: #159 ploome hineni

fine

/bleh but fine

Yes, been feeling a little bleh but fine myself today.
Yesterday we had a high in the 70's
Today in the 40's
Will be near 70 again tomorrow, and near 80 by day after tomorrow. Then it will rain and get colder again.
It think this is why I feel bleh. I need some sort of consistency.

168 Thanos[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:26pm
169 invictus1  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:41pm

re: #143 CapeCoddah

Huffpo slammed for content theft:
[Link: blog.wired.com...]

Actually, at the Huffington Post, they don't call that 'theft'. They call that 'spreading the content around'.

170 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:45pm

re: #161 ploome hineni

getting a car

OOOOH!
Whatcha gonna get?
I love new car stories.

171 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:54pm

re: #163 thor

Who cares.

This is America and those people are entitled to their religion and religious beliefs. We can disagree with their belief system, but the Constitution entitles them to it.

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

We were simply discussing his beliefs until he took down some controversial ones. We aren't attacking him but his decision and reasons for removing his beliefs.

172 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:54pm

IMO

Mega-church, mega-pastor, mega-president, mega-compromise.

173 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:56:55pm

re: #163 thor

Who cares.

This is America and those people are entitled to their religion and religious beliefs. We can disagree with their belief system, but the Constitution entitles them to it.

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

it's for the attention...Christians are an easy target and the payoff is very nice...

174 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:07pm

arggg.

Sorry, that last link is to an enemy, total nutball site, so be warned

175 wrenchwench  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:13pm

re: #163 thor

Who cares.

This is America and those people are entitled to their religion and religious beliefs. We can disagree with their belief system, but the Constitution entitles them to it.

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

I think you don't get it. Is Warren attacking himself?

176 Cicero05  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:15pm

re: #168 Thanos

Texe says Rick is one of the illuminati.

I've never seen him at a meeting.

177 twincitiesgirl  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:23pm

re: #168 Thanos

lol

178 wolfie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:36pm

re: #147 quickjustice

Creationism does NOT deny modern genetics.
Your statement that being a YEC precludes mastery of medicine is stupid.
STUPID as in stupidus, having the quality of being in a stupor.

179 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:40pm

re: #174 Thanos

arggg.

Sorry, that last link is to an enemy, total nutball site, so be warned

I read the first sentence and slammed it shut. OY

180 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:40pm

re: #162 Wishing

I might add: in 325CE it became ILLEGAL for *christians* to have any dealings with Jews.
So much for the Messiah, eh?

As I say in #165, false preachers and teachings. There were many sins conducted in the name of Christianity by the leaders in the early years.

181 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:42pm

re: #163 thor

Who cares.

This is America and those people are entitled to their religion and religious beliefs. We can disagree with their belief system, but the Constitution entitles them to it.

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

Gives us an excuse to seethe.

182 Summer  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:57:59pm

I just wrote to Pandasthumb asking why Bush's statement on belief in evolution and not taking the bible liberally has not produced a single post at that site, or many other evolutionist sites. I also wondered in my email why evolution-supporting blogs did not make a huge story out of this.

I believe, truly, much as I completely agree with their arguments about science, that this is a reflection of their dogmatic leftist thinking: it is very hard for them to be humble and apologize. They have given Bush an inordinate amount of shit for the last 8 years based on their assumption that he was some sort of religious fanatic. Now that it is revealed, from the man's own words, that he may very well not be, there is no reciprocal moment of mea culpa stemming from the left.

I find this very hard to forgive. I am a huge supporter of the work of science sites, especially ones dealing with evolution, but I think that culturally they can be just as dogmatic as those they decry.

I find it odd that I, a mere single atheist war supporting girl, could have understood the nuances in many of Bush's actions and statements as opposed to the majority of those of my "compatriots" on the side of science. I find it also reprehensible in many respects that they are the ones who slammed Bush for any lack of "nuance" when they never had any on their own part.

I just had to say that because it has been bothering me since Bush's statement on the 11th. I think that Bush is owed a huge apology from many in the scientific community. I may not agree with Bush on many issues, but I do still have a moral stance and guide to follow: my conscience. And if they had any, they would be lining up to appease what it should be currently saying to them.

183 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:58:10pm

re: #121 Jetpilot1101

Jimmy Carter is very, very worried about his "legacy". And he should be. I don't think Habitat for Humanity will be enough to salvage his reputation. (And in my youth, I worked on Habitat projects.) Losing Iran was a huge blow. And stagflation almost destroyed the U.S. economy. As President, Carter was a horror.

He isn't improving his prospects with his current anti-Semitic activities.

184 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:58:29pm

re: #172 Walter L. Newton

IMO

Mega-church, mega-pastor, mega-president, mega-compromise.

that's it Walter...he'll roll over and nobody will hardly notice

185 HoosierHoops  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:58:56pm

re: #170 reine.de.tout

OOOOH!
Whatcha gonna get?
I love new car stories.

Is a canary yellow Beemer work for you?
LOL

186 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:59:03pm

"I know that the pictures we all grew up with in the movies were that dinosaurs roamed a lifeless, volcanic planet. Remember these are just pictures drawn by someone today!"

Well, there may have been some popular depictions of dinosaurs inhabiting a lifeless, volcanic planet, but no serious scientist would posit that such large creatures could live in an environment without an ample source of feed for the herbivores, and prey for the carnivores.

And certainly there was volcanism from time to time, but probably no more frequently than in the historic era, on a world-wide basis.

The Royal Tyrrell Museum in Drumheller, Alberta has a conservatory filled with plants and trees that were prevalent during the late Cretaceous period. The only remarkable thing about this collection of plants is how unremarkable they are. Dinosaurs could probably live quite handily on the vegetation available today.

They are making something of a straw man argument, there.

187 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:59:35pm

re: #180 Outrider

As I say in #165, false preachers and teachings. There were many sins conducted in the name of Christianity by the leaders in the early years.

In the EARLY years? The early years were GOOD years. By 250, the best was past.

188 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:59:38pm

re: #148 yochanan

spilling one's seed is forbidden, not just in gay sex but in masturbation and oral sex as well.
the Torah clearly says the gay sex act is forbidden.

the problem i have is they want us to say it is OK which i will not do the most i can do is ignore them, but this is hard when they demand attention. for example when gay activists disrupt religious activities that we feel are holy or important.

The earliest teachings of the Church agree with what you have said concerning the Torah, which is indeed what the Law of God says. Many Christians get there role backwards however: What doctor, upon finding out that his patient has tuberculosis, throws his patient out of his office with curses and threats? What doctor, upon finding out his patient has cancer, spits at his patient and declares that patient worthy of death? He'd be thrown out of his practice for malpractice. But many Christians, when they see their fellow man suffering, too often have this approach.

189 jester6  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 4:59:52pm

OT:

Thought you folks might want to see how the Dems are stealing an election in front of everyone - and no one seems to care. We really are becoming a banana republic.

[Link: www.foxnews.com...]

190 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:00:04pm

re: #163 thor

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

To attack Christian's what?

191 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:00:04pm

re: #183 quickjustice

Jimmy Carter is very, very worried about his "legacy". And he should be. I don't think Habitat for Humanity will be enough to salvage his reputation. (And in my youth, I worked on Habitat projects.) Losing Iran was a huge blow. And stagflation almost destroyed the U.S. economy. As President, Carter was a horror.

He isn't improving his prospects with his current anti-Semitic activities.

All good points and I believe Rick Warren will share a quiet piece of the ashbin of history together. In 50 years no one will care about the Purpose Driven Life.

192 rawmuse  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:00:09pm

re: #168 Thanos

Texe says Rick is one of the illuminati.

I checked my Membership Directory. Nope. He ain't there.

193 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:00:25pm
194 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:00:45pm

re: #185 HoosierHoops

Is a canary yellow Beemer work for you?
LOL

Hiya, HH!
Trying to get Ploome to talk about her new car.
But she is either ignoring me or she has left the room.

Myself - I have a Toyota Rav4 that I like.
But I want something fancier.
Can't decide if I want a "crossover", like the Lincoln MKX which has a really reduced price right now,
OR
something fun, like the Solara convertible.

Whatcha think?

195 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:00:47pm

re: #187 Wishing

In the EARLY years? The early years were GOOD years. By 250, the best was past.

suit yourself.

196 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:00:54pm

re: #163 thor

Who cares.

This is America and those people are entitled to their religion and religious beliefs. We can disagree with their belief system, but the Constitution entitles them to it.

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

Nobody is attacking Christians here. We are attacking the stupid ideas held by a small subset of self-identified Christians.

197 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:01:13pm

re: #178 wolfie

It's clear we disagree. You'll do better when you resist the urge to insult people who disagree with you.

198 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:01:27pm

re: #191 Jetpilot1101

All good points and I believe Rick Warren will share a quiet piece of the ashbin of history together. In 50 years no one will care about the Purpose Driven Life.

i'll wager Warren is so filthy rich his ash bin would make you drool with envy...

199 revobob  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:01:40pm

re: #176 Cicero05

I've never seen him at a meeting.


Sure we have- second row, left aisle- remember that Hawaiian shirt- you even commented that it was too informal for such a gathering.

200 Killian Bundy  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:01:43pm

GO PACKERS!

/all Minnesotans are Cheeseheads tonight

201 so.cal.swede  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:02:02pm

re: #62 reine.de.tout

and you would be absolutely right

202 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:02:36pm

re: #198 albusteve

i'll wager Warren is so filthy rich his ash bin would make you drool with envy...

I am completely content with what the good Lord has given me. Rick Warren's ashbin doesn't interest me or make me envious.

203 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:02:42pm

Warren is no Billy Graham. Graham served as a spiritual adviser to several Presidents of both political parties. He never compromised his integrity for any of them.

204 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:03:19pm

re: #193 buzzsawmonkey

Yes! Yes! Pray for the carnivores!

Perhaps a musical mass.

We need only tweak a bit from the Requiem: T-Rex Tremendae.

205 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:03:49pm

re: #202 Jetpilot1101

I am completely content with what the good Lord has given me. Rick Warren's ashbin doesn't interest me or make me envious.

good on ya...you should see how I live and I could care less about hot running water...wealth is so overrated...

206 mfarmer1  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:04:02pm

re: #137 Outrider

I'm sure a T-Rex would have been real popular on board the ark. I'm not even sure how a Brontosaurus would fit? Small wonder Noah left them to fend for themselves. ;-)>
/

Why am I supposed to give someone who believes such crap a pass because it's their "religious belief" when those same people would belittle and ridicule anyone who believed in alien abductions? Heck, the latter has a better chance of being legit than the ark nonsense. I know, as experiments have been performed on me aboard alien spacecraft. As a San Diego sports fan, they felt I had been through enough and stopped the procedures.

207 HelloDare  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:04:30pm

re: #182 Summer

And it's the left that always got on Bush for never admitting he was wrong.

208 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:05:01pm

The old Flintstones cartoons are literally true. Fred and Barney have pet dinosaurs, and Fred uses a dinosaur to move earth at his construction site job.

QED ;-)

209 ggt  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:05:06pm

Have a wonderful evening Lizards!

210 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:05:21pm
211 ggt  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:05:41pm

re: #208 quickjustice

The old Flintstones cartoons are literally true. Fred and Barney have pet dinosaurs, and Fred uses a dinosaur to move earth at his construction site job.

QED ;-)

And Dino really knocks him over and licks his face when he comes home?

212 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:05:44pm

re: #206 mfarmer1

Why am I supposed to give someone who believes such crap a pass because it's their "religious belief" when those same people would belittle and ridicule anyone who believed in alien abductions? Heck, the latter has a better chance of being legit than the ark nonsense. I know, as experiments have been performed on me aboard alien spacecraft. As a San Diego sports fan, they felt I had been through enough and stopped the procedures.

ahhhh. Ohhh Kaaaay.

213 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:05:45pm

re: #163 thor

Who cares.

This is America and those people are entitled to their religion and religious beliefs. We can disagree with their belief system, but the Constitution entitles them to it.

Why is it so popular to attack Christian's all of sudden?

Where did you get "Christians" from? We are attacking specific words and actions by one person, Rick Warren. How does that equate to "Christians"?

/same arg the O used during the election - any criticism of him was racism...

214 Jetpilot1101  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:06:07pm

re: #205 albusteve

good on ya...you should see how I live and I could care less about hot running water...wealth is so overrated...

It is all I care about it being a good husband, father and servant of God. Wealth doesn't buy you happiness. God has blessed me in many ways that are far better than millions of dollars. I wouldn't give up my life for all the tea in China or all of Rick Warren's millions.

215 ihatepantz  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:06:48pm

I can't wait until Jan 20, 2009. Welcome to the U.S.S.A.

216 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:06:54pm

And speculating about whether the large herbivores on the Ark had sufficent food is fruitless.

/rimshot

217 Cicero05  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:06:57pm

re: #206 mfarmer1

I know, as experiments have been performed on me aboard alien spacecraft.

So how'd you like that bit with the probe? Kind of wild, I thought.

218 J.S.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:07:25pm

Wow. Obviously, Warren is an illiterate in terms of science. (I didn't even bother reading all of his bizarre claims...I stopped reading when Warren claimed that dinosaurs and people co-existed...as I laugh...Flinstones redux, I guess...)

219 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:07:30pm
220 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:07:59pm

re: #213 Thanos

Where did you get "Christians" from? We are attacking specific words and actions by one person, Rick Warren. How does that equate to "Christians"?

/same arg the O used during the election - any criticism of him was racism...

Check it's profile, it won't answer.

221 HoosierHoops  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:08:07pm

re: #194 reine.de.tout

Hiya, HH!
Trying to get Ploome to talk about her new car.
But she is either ignoring me or she has left the room.

Myself - I have a Toyota Rav4 that I like.
But I want something fancier.
Can't decide if I want a "crossover", like the Lincoln MKX which has a really reduced price right now,
OR
something fun, like the Solara convertible.

Whatcha think?

I'd go with the convertible..But that's just me..Go with the fun car when we all are freezing out asses of and you are living in 70 degrees weather.
When we lived in Hawaii.. I had a mustang convertible.
No regrets my friend

222 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:08:10pm

(Tough room.)

Don't forget to tip your waitresses!

Later.

223 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:08:25pm

re: #217 Cicero05

So how'd you like that bit with the probe? Kind of wild, I thought.

It always come down to the anal probe, doesn't it?

224 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:09:00pm

re: #211 ggt

Hey, people co-existed with dinosaurs back in those days, right? ;-)

225 jacksontn  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:09:05pm

Remember when Matt Damon was making fun of Sarah Palin about the dinosaurs ...the left was really laughing about it ...well, now someone Obama has tapped to be part of his big day spiritual team who "really" thinks that way and maybe he was told it would be in Obama's best interest to take those statement off his website ...the timing just seems strange ...

226 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:09:23pm

re: #152 quickjustice

In the Western church, Easter falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the first day of spring. In the Eastern Church, it falls a week later.

The Greek Orthodox website, goarch.org, says this:


In response to this ongoing problem, the First Ecumenical Council convened at Nicaea in 325 took up the issue. It determined that Pascha should be celebrated on the Sunday which follows the first full moon after the vernal equinox-the actual beginning of spring. If the full moon happens to fall on a Sunday, Pascha is observed the following Sunday. The day taken to be the invariable date of the vernal equinox is March 21. Hence, the determination of the date of Pascha is governed by a process dependent on the vernal equinox and the phase of the moon.

[Link: www.goarch.org...]

227 HelloDare  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:10:02pm

re: #216 Occasional Reader

And speculating about whether the large herbivores on the Ark had sufficent food is fruitless.

/rimshot

Manna.

228 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:10:32pm

re: #214 Jetpilot1101

It is all I care about it being a good husband, father and servant of God. Wealth doesn't buy you happiness. God has blessed me in many ways that are far better than millions of dollars. I wouldn't give up my life for all the tea in China or all of Rick Warren's millions.

namaste...personally I revel in my lifestyle...I have no debt...I have money in the coffers...the Feds have forgotten all about me or cant run me down...I take care of myself..I'm armed of course and my two kids up north are super stars...I'm cool...

229 badbear  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:10:34pm

re: #210 buzzsawmonkey

"Ark nonsense?" Next thing you know you'll be saying you don't believe in Arkham. Be forewarned; the great Chthulhu is not lightly mocked.

Chthulhu fits right into this thread.

230 Outrider  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:10:49pm

re: #223 Walter L. Newton

It always come down to the anal probe, doesn't it?

I was thinking the same thing. It always seems to be an anal probe on them alien abduction websites? Do we have kinky aliens or kinky nuts? ;-)>

231 SFGoth  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:11:40pm

re: #206 mfarmer1

Why am I supposed to give someone who believes such crap a pass because it's their "religious belief" when those same people would belittle and ridicule anyone who believed in alien abductions? Heck, the latter has a better chance of being legit than the ark nonsense. I know, as experiments have been performed on me aboard alien spacecraft. As a San Diego sports fan, they felt I had been through enough and stopped the procedures.

No kidding. It's rather like Christians crapping all over pagans, Wiccans, and such. Superstitious belief is superstitious belief, whether held by a few or many. How many religions have simultaneously sprung up in more than 1 place? I'm not aware of any. You want to have your beliefs? Fine, but don't belittle others' because they're "nonsensical".

232 rawmuse  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:11:53pm

Man existed the same time as the dinosaurs, it is the new Flat Earth.

233 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:12:17pm

Warren could have a great future as preacher to the President if he kisses the right posteriors, I guess. I bet that's what the take down of Warren's website is really about.

I shouldn't criticize though. A friend of mine had a preacher who kissed Kofe Annan's tail while Annan was Secretary General.

234 wolfie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:12:46pm

re: #154 buzzsawmonkey

I don't disagree. I don't mind saying I have serious theological quarrels with sola scriptura, not to mention literalism.

But one thing needs to be said. The only way many of us ever hear about the message of these churches is through the big media filter. The emphasis on creationism and homosexuality, IMO, reflects the media's interests and not the churches'.

(I can honestly say I never actually knew a "fundamentalist"....I mean someone I KNEW was one....until I moved here 20 years ago. Much less did I have the chance to get to know a whole lot of them.)

235 Racer X  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:14:26pm

Brontosaurus burgers are yummy!

236 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:15:04pm

re: #226 David IV of Georgia

This past year, the Western Church celebrated Easter on the date of the first full moon, which fell on March 21. That's as early as Easter can fall.

When does the Eastern Church always celebrate Easter a week later than the Western Church?

237 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:15:16pm

re: #233 quickjustice

Warren could have a great future as preacher to the President if he kisses the right posteriors, I guess. I bet that's what the take down of Warren's website is really about.

I shouldn't criticize though. A friend of mine had a preacher who kissed Kofe Annan's tail while Annan was Secretary General.

Gee, do you think? I bet dollars to donuts. I can't wait to hear his explanation (if he ever gives one).

238 Killian Bundy  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:15:35pm

re: #235 Racer X

Brontosaurus burgers are yummy!

Just don't order the brontosaurus ribs.

/they'll tip your car over

239 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:16:13pm

re: #154 buzzsawmonkey

going in to my faves under the "buzzsawmonkey" tag.

240 HelloDare  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:16:32pm

re: #232 rawmuse

Man existed the same time as the dinosaurs, it is the new Flat Earth.

That's how the dinosaurs died. The the dump bastards fell over the edge.

241 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:16:44pm

re: #237 Walter L. Newton

Gee, do you think? I bet dollars to donuts. I can't wait to hear his explanation (if he ever gives one).

two words...air time...I'm very cynical with regard to this subject (and many others I suppose)

242 wolfie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:18:03pm

re: #197 quickjustice

I didn't say YOU were stupid. If I thought YOU were stupid, I wouldn't have bothered. I said that a particular statement you made happens to be stupid.
But if I personally offended you I am sincerely sorry.

243 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:18:25pm

re: #196 Alberta Oil Peon

To be honest, there is a strong current going through much of the western world today that ridicules people of faith, specifically the Catholic Church, and her steadfast teachings. As well, this encapsulates people who observe such teaching as well.

Lets face it, many religious people are complete asses. I have too many in my own family. The morons who handle serpents, or withhold insulin from a child with juvenile diabetes because G-d is going to heal them should be scrutinized, and under a microscope because they are just idiots.

However, people are still allowed to exercise their own conscience. If a Catholic pharmacist feels it is not in his comfort zone to dispense a morning after pill, so be it. It is not as if there are not enough pharmacies around that will fill the prescription. Not very long ago, there was a story about a wannabe transsexual calling the main number of a Catholic Hospital, asking if they perform that surgery, and then pursuing a lawsuit in the aftermath.

On the other end of that spectrum, are the people who put all of their faith in everything secular. They correlate horrors of the past related to religion, or how the religion retards society. What I never seem to see accompany their argument, is what totally secular societies have brought upon their own populace. Even Khrushchev would have to admit Stalin's brutality in time.

Our country is in a major struggle right now. Our population is divided. opportunists abound at every corner.

We have forgotten the truly magnificent ideas which are the birthright of this nation.

244 itellu3times  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:18:32pm

re: #178 wolfie

Creationism does NOT deny modern genetics.
Your statement that being a YEC precludes mastery of medicine is stupid.
STUPID as in stupidus, having the quality of being in a stupor.

So it only denies ancient genetics? Come now.

And it's modern doctors and scientists who assert exactly what quickjustice was saying, I believe it was posted on LGF in the last few days.

It might be a little strong, as the average practicing MD is (don't get me started, but let's say doesn't have to be much of a scientist). So your average car mechanic doesn't have to have a PhD in physics. Your average car mechanic can deny that atoms exist, for all anyone cares, right? But let's say it's unlikely to make him a better mechanic.

So, maybe it's a little true, and I only wish it were truer, but things are certainly moving in that direction. We'll all be geneticists in a few years, carrying around our sequenced DNA, comparing and contrasting. Can't wait for the facebook widgets.

245 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:19:59pm

re: #241 albusteve

two words...air time...I'm very cynical with regard to this subject (and many others I suppose)

I agree. I've seen this guy operate, he's another scam, mega-church pastor. Sorry, these guys are almost become cookie-cutter, and he fit's the shyster cookie mold perfectly.

246 LEGION  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:20:34pm

Yabba dabba do- we still live with dinosaurs- they are called crocodiles and alligators- birds are direct dinosaur descendants- ect ect. How about them apples?

247 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:20:34pm
248 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:23:05pm

re: #246 LEGION

Yabba dabba do- we still live with dinosaurs- they are called crocodiles and alligators- birds are direct dinosaur descendants- ect ect. How about them apples?

No kidding. And my parrot Maisey, still has a genetic memory of that asteroid that slammed into the planet and wiped most of them out. She'll fall right off the perch when there is a loud bang around here.

249 Yankee Division Son  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:23:27pm

Busted: AP Caught Consciously, Deliberately Stripping Party ID of Disgraced Dems Out of the Original Local Reports They Put on the Wires

250 Bobibutu  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:23:50pm

In other news ... popcorn futures spiked once again blowing thru old record highs.

251 wolfie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:23:52pm

re: #247 buzzsawmonkey

No doubt about that. Symbiosis!

252 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:24:41pm

re: #246 LEGION

Don't forget the coelacanth. :)

253 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:24:49pm

re: #236 quickjustice

This past year, the Western Church celebrated Easter on the date of the first full moon, which fell on March 21. That's as early as Easter can fall.

When does the Eastern Church always celebrate Easter a week later than the Western Church?


Sometimes it is nearly a month later, sometimes a week before. The Alexandrian Orthodox Church was given the task of determining the date of Easter (or Pascha, which means Passover) each year. See #226 which tells the method they use.

254 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:24:57pm

re: #245 Walter L. Newton

I agree. I've seen this guy operate, he's another scam, mega-church pastor. Sorry, these guys are almost become cookie-cutter, and he fit's the shyster cookie mold perfectly.

another Supa Star...raking it in on the backs of his flock...ho fucking hum...I just have a problem with churches that get so big they build gigantic shrines, broadcast on TV, they write books and go to Washington peddling their phony wares, fill stadiums and get face lifts...what have they become?....pretty obvious to this hayseed...

255 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:25:31pm

re: #244 itellu3times

Thanks. I don't claim that physicians are geniuses, but the trend in modern medicine is towards individualized treatment based upon the results of genetic tests. We're not quite there yet, but that's the direction in which things are moving.

Such a trend dooms Obama's plans to nationalize medicine unless he also destroys all medical progress. He may try to do that, but it won't go over well with the patient population.

256 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:25:36pm

Epic Campaign Fail...

Hillary Clinton had to write off 13.2 million that she lent herself during the campaign. Here's something I did not know...

She can't write it off. Not as a campaign contribution, not as a bad debt. Total loss.

Epic Fail...

Walter? Should she get a bail-out?

(duck and run!)

257 LEGION  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:25:47pm

I'm much more concerned with the BO's choices of Cabinet members- Tom Daschle? I thought he didn't want anybody who was a Lobbyist? The only time he reached out to the Republicans was when he stole one of our guys to leave our party! The BO lies continue. His education secretary? A frackin' socialist marxist commie. This Warren thang is just a bone to throw to the right to appease them for the inauguration. It will be the last we ever see of him in the bo white house.

258 hazzyday  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:26:01pm

re: #213 Thanos

Where did you get "Christians" from? We are attacking specific words and actions by one person, Rick Warren. How does that equate to "Christians"?

/same arg the O used during the election - any criticism of him was racism...

Upthread. It's all about Christianity. First 100 posts you can read it.

259 big steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:27:16pm

For to believe that dinosaurs and humans walked the Earth at the same time one has to therefore believe that radiocarbon dating is wrong. To believe radiocarbon dating to be wrong one has to invalidate one of its basic premises that being either the constancy of radioactive decay or that molecules cannot be effectively separated by exposure to acceleration across a magnetic field. The latter being the basis of mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry is the underlying analytical chemistry behind radiocarbon dating. To believe mass spectrometry cannot work, other than obviating probably millions of functioning MS in laboratories around the world, one has to deny that the first test atomic bomb was fiction in that the first fissionable materials were obtained by mass spectrometry. To deny the constancy of radioactive decay, one has to deny a host of convenional applications.

People want to state that they can just believe in something, such as believing that man and dinosaurs co-existed, however what people don't want to do is follow those beliefs to their logical conclusion. It is fine to believe and also state that no one person's beliefs can over-rule another. However, to be intellectually honest, you have to see where those beliefs will lead you and when they lead you to a clear contradiction then one has to challenge the original believe.

260 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:27:17pm

re: #254 albusteve


I agree wholeheartedly. TV preachers have turned off as many as they have snared.

261 quickjustice  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:28:04pm

re: #254 albusteve

The only one who successfully pulled it off was Billy Graham with his mass, televised "crusades". By "successfully", I mean that Graham wasn't corrupted by his fame. All of the others were.

262 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:28:37pm
263 anduril3019  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:28:50pm

Oh, I see, now it's OK to mock the Flintstones?

264 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:30:29pm

re: #256 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Epic Campaign Fail...

Hillary Clinton had to write off 13.2 million that she lent herself during the campaign. Here's something I did not know...

She can't write it off. Not as a campaign contribution, not as a bad debt. Total loss.

Epic Fail...

Walter? Should she get a bail-out?

(duck and run!)

You are really trying to get my Andy Rooney ruffled today, aren't you. I am SO waiting for that guy to retire (anyway he has too), because I will be first in line for his job.

Making money for being a cynic, something I do as easy as breathing. Shit, talk about robbing the public blind, what a gig.

265 Colonel Panik  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:30:34pm

re: #8 rawmuse

FTA: " Man and dinosaurs lived at the same time. "
Gosh, I hope not. Can you imagine having to contend with a Velociraptor? or a herd of them?


I'm thinking with the right firearms it could be kind of fun. The ultimate dangerous game. And of course, since they tell us dinosaurs are related to birds, they probably taste like chicken...

266 A Kiwi Infidel  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:30:39pm

Completely OT,

I am off for a few weeks, I wish all lizards a safe festive Christmas and New Year. Dont eat or drink too much.

May the Lord bless and keep you all, even those of you who dont believe in Him.

Later lizards.

267 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:30:59pm

re: #243 formercorpsman

That's a very thoughtful and well-reasoned statement, and I am pretty much on-side with you, there. People with strongly-held moral beliefs, particularly in matters such as abortion, should not be required to violate their own beliefs to provide service to a non-believer.

One little nit-pick: describing something like the former Soviet Union as "relentlessly secular" almost misses the point. The "state religion" of the Soviet Union was effectively Communism. To all intents and purposes, it was a theocracy, governed by a cabal of Communist priests who dispensed the revealed word of their "god" Karl Marx, as revealed by the saint, Lenin. Reason really wasn't part of the equation.

268 Charles  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:31:27pm

More Rick Warren news:

A few weeks ago the Saddleback Church participated with Holy Land Foundation co-conspirators ISNA in a forum on global health.

[Link: www.isna.net...]

Note that this was after the guilty verdicts in the HLF trial.

269 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:31:28pm

re: #262 buzzsawmonkey

I don't fault someone for being pastor of a "megachurch." To think that there is something innately wrong with size/success is silly. Good things do not only come in small packages.

On the other hand, merely having a big operation is no proof that one is doing anything useful either.

According to the new testament, the maximum gathering size for a service (or a fish fry) is 5000 souls.
/

270 Summer  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:32:02pm

re: #207 HelloDare

And it's the left that always got on Bush for never admitting he was wrong.

Yes, and I'm very upset about this. I too have taken a huge amount of shit from their side because I support him, as an atheist, and have been saying for ages that he is not the fundamentalist nut they have always assumed him to be. But is any apology forthcoming?

I won't hold my breath.

I guess it's not politically correct for them to say "I'm sorry" in a very loud voice to Bush and the likes of me. And so, after eight years, one of their major assumptions about Bush has been proven wrong; one of mine about the left has been proven correct yet again.

And their silence only shows that they are still too blind to see.

271 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:32:35pm

re: #269 Walter L. Newton

According to the new testament, the maximum gathering size for a service (or a fish fry) is 5000 souls.
/

And you don't even have to bring fish.

G'night kids!

272 J.S.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:32:36pm

I often wonder why someone such as Rick Warren reads the bible. why? to obtain "scientific" info? to iron out the finer points of the "origin of species?" (I find it really laughable/pretty crazy...if after being asked, "Why do you read the bible?" and one's reply is "for the science.")

273 LEGION  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:32:45pm

re: #248 Walter L. Newton

Parrots are too labor intensive- one must spend a huge quantity of time with them or they go wacko and pull out their feathers. Too many psychological problems- them and monkeys. Stop typing Walter and pet your parrot!

274 wolfie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:33:00pm

re: #244 itellu3times

It's more than a little strong. And yes, I know, it's repeated all over the place.

You hit the nail on the head, really. You don't have to have a PhD in genetics to be a surgeon. You don't have to know a damned thing about paleontology to be a nurse. Why, even a practicing, creationist Muslim (gasp!) can be an excellent dentist!

275 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:33:09pm

re: #254 albusteve

I don't think Warren means to be a charlatan or to deliberately deceive. Although he has a Doctor of Ministry degree, I don't think that having a clear and methodical set of beliefs has been his priority.

Billy Graham started from a set of beliefs and based his ministry on those beliefs. Rick Warren, at least by my take, started from a method that seems to work and then fits his beliefs to his method. Thus his beliefs can evolve to fit the needs of his ministry. His biggest problem was writing a book that Oprah liked.

276 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:33:14pm
277 Charles  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:33:20pm

And President Bush didn't do anything to throw ISNA out, either, by the way.

278 notutopia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:33:31pm

This is disgusting. If you can't find it...I didn't say it.
Memory holes and day after amnesia are becoming
Obama's new legacy of hope and change. The ever more frequent and commonplace occurrences of erasing words from the web is becoming more redundant and mundane and lends to an anticipatory and expectant trend of denial of guilt for the lack of accountability of being able to stand up for their own core beliefs.

Self inflicted censuring of your own web site.... A sure sign of cowardice and guilt.

279 taxfreekiller[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:33:37pm
280 hazzyday  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:34:35pm

I think the Rev. weighed the scale of webpages vs presidential talks and web pages lost. I doubt if his religious views and how he wants to express them have changed.

281 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:35:06pm

re: #273 LEGION

Parrots are too labor intensive- one must spend a huge quantity of time with them or they go wacko and pull out their feathers. Too many psychological problems- them and monkeys. Stop typing Walter and pet your parrot!

I can type with one hand, I know. (tacky responses in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1... )

282 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:36:06pm

re: #279 taxfreekiller

Jeeezus...and I thought the mormons were bad... LOL

283 LEGION  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:36:38pm

re: #281 Walter L. Newton

Augghhhhh ahhhhhhh Mind Bleach MIND BLEACH

Newton- you are evil and must be destroyed!
/

284 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:36:40pm

re: #268 Charles

More Rick Warren news:

A few weeks ago the Saddleback Church participated with Holy Land Foundation co-conspirators ISNA in a forum on global health.

[Link: www.isna.net...]

Note that this was after the guilty verdicts in the HLF trial.

The stench keeps building.

285 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:37:00pm

The whole Rick Warren thing does have me puzzled, not that Obama would pick him, because that is shameless shilling to the right; what has me confused is why Rick would accept.

Back in the 70's, Cleveland had a mayor named Ralph Perk. When President Ford set up his inauguration after Nixon resigned, Perk was invited. However Mayor Perk declined because it was his bowling night. Not withstanding the jokes, I always thought Mayor Perk did stick to his priories.

286 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:37:12pm

re: #258 hazzyday

Wrong, you have to be pretty thin skinned or paranoid to interpret the first 100 comments as all attacking "Christianity". Do you have a specific beef about a specific comment? If so take it up with the comment author and quit making sweeping statements.

287 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:37:43pm

re: #275 David IV of Georgia

I don't think Warren means to be a charlatan or to deliberately deceive. Although he has a Doctor of Ministry degree, I don't think that having a clear and methodical set of beliefs has been his priority.

Billy Graham started from a set of beliefs and based his ministry on those beliefs. Rick Warren, at least by my take, started from a method that seems to work and then fits his beliefs to his method. Thus his beliefs can evolve to fit the needs of his ministry. His biggest problem was writing a book that Oprah liked.

I wonder if that's how CBBHO hooked up with him.

288 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:37:56pm
289 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:38:05pm

re: #282 fclass308

Jeeezus...and I thought the mormons were bad... LOL

Do you have a problem with Mormons? What do you mean "bad?"

290 LEGION  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:38:44pm

re: #285 Big Steve

What was his average? How was his team doing? Was it a money league? All valid questions- -- my team won best name one year. MIASIS DRAGON
:-)

291 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:39:07pm

re: #288 buzzsawmonkey

That was the mayor who set his hair on fire, wasn't it?

Yes....with a blow torch at a bridge ribbon cutting where the ribbon was made from steel.

292 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:39:07pm

re: #285 Big Steve

The whole Rick Warren thing does have me puzzled, not that Obama would pick him, because that is shameless shilling to the right; what has me confused is why Rick would accept.

Back in the 70's, Cleveland had a mayor named Ralph Perk. When President Ford set up his inauguration after Nixon resigned, Perk was invited. However Mayor Perk declined because it was his bowling night. Not withstanding the jokes, I always thought Mayor Perk did stick to his priories.

CBBHO had Warren review a chapter in his Audacity to Hope that came out in 2006.

293 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:40:18pm

re: #292 MandyManners

CBBHO had Warren review a chapter in his Audacity to Hope that came out in 2006.

"CBBHO" ?

294 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:40:47pm

re: #275 David IV of Georgia

I don't think Warren means to be a charlatan or to deliberately deceive. Although he has a Doctor of Ministry degree, I don't think that having a clear and methodical set of beliefs has been his priority.

Billy Graham started from a set of beliefs and based his ministry on those beliefs. Rick Warren, at least by my take, started from a method that seems to work and then fits his beliefs to his method. Thus his beliefs can evolve to fit the needs of his ministry. His biggest problem was writing a book that Oprah liked.

the elixir of money fame and power is just as intoxicating for a preacher as a gangster...human nature doesnt recognize all the tweeners...imo of course

295 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:42:30pm

re: #246 LEGION

Yabba dabba do- we still live with dinosaurs- they are called crocodiles and alligators- birds are direct dinosaur descendants- ect ect. How about them apples?

IIRC, crocodiles and gators have been around since before the heyday of the dinosaurs, an earlier branch off the reptilian main line.

Birds, OTOH, do seem to have to be the living descendants of dinosaurs, or more correctly, are the present representatives of one line of dinosaurs that escaped the K-T extinction.

There were a great many other creatures, not just dinosaurs, that got the chop in that event. Dinos are just the biggest and best-known.

296 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:42:30pm

re: #285 Big Steve

He may see it as similar to Jesus dining with sinners. Or it could be that he has been ensnared by the power and glory of Washington. Or he may have his own reasons. It is very hard to guess what a persons motives are—sometimes they don't even know.

/I thought only friars stuck to their priories.

297 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:42:41pm

re: #285 Big Steve

... what has me confused is why Rick would accept.

As the old saying goes "Call me old fashioned but I expect a dinner and a kiss first." That's what's coming next for his flock.

298 Killian Bundy  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:42:46pm

Announcer: "This is Bears weather"

/yeah, like Green Bay plays in the tropics, they just call it the "frozen tundra"

299 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:42:56pm

re: #293 Big Steve

"CBBHO" ?

CommieBastardBHO.

300 Fat Jolly Penguin  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:43:35pm
Many scientists theorize that this may have been an asteroid striking the earth, while many Christians wonder if this event could have been the worldwide flood in Noah’s day.

Whack me if I'm off base here, but that sounds to me like trying to say that Christianity and science are mutually exclusive. To which I can only say, WTF?

301 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:43:38pm

re: #295 Alberta Oil Peon

IIRC, crocodiles and gators have been around since before the heyday of the dinosaurs, an earlier branch off the reptilian main line.

Birds, OTOH, do seem to have to be the living descendants of dinosaurs, or more correctly, are the present representatives of one line of dinosaurs that escaped the K-T extinction.

There were a great many other creatures, not just dinosaurs, that got the chop in that event. Dinos are just the biggest and best-known.

If you wish to encompass them all as well as turtles and snakes, just say "Diapsids"

302 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:43:40pm

re: #296 David IV of Georgia

He may see it as similar to Jesus dining with sinners. Or it could be that he has been ensnared by the power and glory of Washington. Or he may have his own reasons. It is very hard to guess what a persons motives are—sometimes they don't even know.

/I thought only friars stuck to their priories.

No, friars "tucked" to their priorities.

303 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:43:54pm

re: #267 Alberta Oil Peon

Precisely. The same as I find the sycophants in this country who gather their children for the supposed impromptu hymns extolling the virtues of Obama being anointed President, a parallel sermon to be rolled out on you tube, offering salvation for your secular soul.

Recall how if only Kerry and Edwards could become the next leaders, their policies would lead to Christopher Reeve walking again.

It is not just the old Soviet Union. We have lost our will to fight here. Fight in every sense of the word. Rugged individualism. We have too many people bitching about how their lattes are not just right.

Don't get me wrong, I understand what your comment was about which I was responding to. But their it has become very fashionable in the public sector to mock what use to be the bedrock of our society. I don't like where I see this going.

304 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:44:02pm

re: #299 MandyManners

CommieBastardBHO.

LOL

305 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:44:13pm

re: #289 Walter L. Newton

Do you have a problem with Mormons? What do you mean "bad?"


Yeah, I do. I live in a small southeast Arizona town that is run by them. I have studied their doctrine extensively and have learned much about them.

My reference was to "demanding" tithing...and the subscript was a reference to their annual "tithing settlement" with their bishop to verify that they gave all they should.

Yep...bring your W-2 and we'll see if you will get your Temple Recommend card renewed.

That is what was meant. Now the question is...do you have a problem with these facts? :)

306 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:44:23pm

re: #268 Charles

Not good.

Not good at all.

307 wolfie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:45:28pm

re: #275 David IV of Georgia

His biggest problem was writing a book that Oprah liked.

I really don't know much about Rick Warren, and won't judge him one way or another on snippets of info, but I suspect that is the money quote on this thread!

308 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:46:01pm

re: #302 Walter L. Newton

No, friars "tucked" to their priorities.

In some 'hoods Friars tucked to the priorities of Robin the rich to give to the poor.

309 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:46:31pm

re: #305 fclass308

Yeah, I do. I live in a small southeast Arizona town that is run by them. I have studied their doctrine extensively and have learned much about them.

My reference was to "demanding" tithing...and the subscript was a reference to their annual "tithing settlement" with their bishop to verify that they gave all they should.

Yep...bring your W-2 and we'll see if you will get your Temple Recommend card renewed.

That is what was meant. Now the question is...do you have a problem with these facts? :)

pretty stout...good for you

310 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:46:47pm

re: #273 LEGION

Parrots are too labor intensive- one must spend a huge quantity of time with them or they go wacko and pull out their feathers. Too many psychological problems- them and monkeys. Stop typing Walter and pet your parrot!

I was at the local Petco the other day to buy provisions for my cats and I wandered over to the bird area. I think birds in cages is the saddest thing ever. I love birds, and I realize bird lovers do too, but they really do not belong in cages. They have the gift of flight and we stick them in little jail cell. Horrible. Anyway - I fell in love with a couple of the birds. One looked so depressed - and his feathers were a mess. poor things.

311 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:46:51pm

It's interesting that on Dinosaurs and Evolution he doesn't actually say anything concrete to argue a point. It's just waffle leading to bible quotes.

On homosexuality he is perhaps more self honest, regardless of the questionable attempts to be scientific. "The bible says it's a sin, so that's what it is". There is no argument there.

312 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:46:56pm

re: #285 Big Steve

The whole Rick Warren thing does have me puzzled, not that Obama would pick him, because that is shameless shilling to the right; what has me confused is why Rick would accept.

Back in the 70's, Cleveland had a mayor named Ralph Perk. When President Ford set up his inauguration after Nixon resigned, Perk was invited. However Mayor Perk declined because it was his bowling night. Not withstanding the jokes, I always thought Mayor Perk did stick to his priories.

OK. Barack invites Warren, Warren accepts.

You have three choices:
a) both are opportunists, trying for publicity
b) both truly want to create a bridge and advance civility.
c) one each of a) and b) above

I'll dive bomb (a).
(b) requires both men to trust each other.
(c) requires one man (Warren) to be naive.

313 itellu3times  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:47:18pm

re: #255 quickjustice

Thanks. I don't claim that physicians are geniuses, but the trend in modern medicine is towards individualized treatment based upon the results of genetic tests. We're not quite there yet, but that's the direction in which things are moving.

Such a trend dooms Obama's plans to nationalize medicine unless he also destroys all medical progress. He may try to do that, but it won't go over well with the patient population.

I don't think nationalization is contrary to individualized genetic treatments. At least I hope not! Hey, 0bambi is big on preventative medicine, right? Maybe he won't be treating anybody for anything, that sounds like a big cost savings to me!
/not holding my breath on that

314 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:47:52pm

re: #309 albusteve


Thank you. :)

315 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:48:03pm

re: #305 fclass308

Yeah, I do. I live in a small southeast Arizona town that is run by them. I have studied their doctrine extensively and have learned much about them.

My reference was to "demanding" tithing...and the subscript was a reference to their annual "tithing settlement" with their bishop to verify that they gave all they should.

Yep...bring your W-2 and we'll see if you will get your Temple Recommend card renewed.

That is what was meant. Now the question is...do you have a problem with these facts? :)

Hey asshole. You can say what ever the fuck you want to, but you're not going to get much traction here. We do a good enough job of discussing certain beliefs here without dissing another faith.

So, I don't give two shits about your facts, but I would recommend that you keep you're nasty comments off of here.

If you want to DISCUSS a topic, fine. This thread wasn't even about Mormons. You were trying to pick a fight.

So, guess what butthead, you lost.

Oh, and I'm an atheist, so I have no dog in this fight, but you sir, are a jerk.

316 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:48:20pm

re: #303 formercorpsman

Well that last paragraph was coherent.

317 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:48:44pm

re: #305 fclass308

Yeah, I do. I live in a small southeast Arizona town that is run by them. I have studied their doctrine extensively and have learned much about them.

My reference was to "demanding" tithing...and the subscript was a reference to their annual "tithing settlement" with their bishop to verify that they gave all they should.

Yep...bring your W-2 and we'll see if you will get your Temple Recommend card renewed.

That is what was meant. Now the question is...do you have a problem with these facts? :)

An acquaintance of mine who is Mormon has a daughter going to Brigham Young which, if you are a member, is very inexpensive. He did the math and has determined that the free education about balanced his lifetime of tithing.

318 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:49:18pm

re: #292 MandyManners

I remember that as well. I'm not particularly enamored of Rick Warren. He strikes me as being on the more liberal ranks of Christians. That makes this nonsense all the more puzzeling. I grew up in the Southern Baptist church, but I've attended a number of other denominations, including Catholic Mass. While I have attended creationist churches, I had never heard the bullshit about humans co-existing with dinosaurs prior to Charles' posts on this topic.

Which leads me to believe that this is really new shit to come down the pike. Twenty years ago this was no where on the scope. And I say that as someone who believes that God created the Universe.

319 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:49:36pm

to me this thread is disappointing and i am not even a Christian. if i was i would be upset. not very nice.

320 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:49:56pm

re: #268 Charles

More Rick Warren news:

A few weeks ago the Saddleback Church invited Holy Land Foundation co-conspirators ISNA to a forum on global health.

[Link: www.isna.net...]

Note that this was after the guilty verdicts in the HLF trial.

It seems inexcusable in this day to not at least do a moderate Google search on the people you associate with and not just trusting that their glossy brochures are accurate. Assuming of course they are not in fact supporting them. Either way it is troubling.

321 FlakMusic  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:50:11pm

re: #7 buzzsawmonkey

As far as the quote from Leviticus above is concerned, it is totally wrong. The Torah nowhere refers to "homosexuality," only to homosexual acts--and a case can be made that the condemnation was originally directed at such acts being done in furtherance of idolatry (there were certain cults in ancient times which conducted homosexual orgies as part of their worship rites). I don't know enough about the New Testament to comment on those translations, but the mistranslation of the "Old Testament" doesn't give me confidence.

I think that the Hebrew in that verse runs along the lines of:

“And with a male you shall not lay [as the] lyings of a woman”

Nowhere in Torah or the New Testament is the term "homosexuality" used. That's probably in the notion of "sexual orientation" did not exist in the ancient world. The only relevant distinction (outside of the nation of Israel, I've read) was between the penetrator and the penetrated.

I'd disagree, though, with the idea that the prohibition was aimed primarily t idolatry. If my understanding of Hebrew history is correct, it was always interpreted as a blanket prohibition, and the NT writings are consistent with that (as in Romans 1).

322 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:50:22pm

re: #310 FrogMarch

323 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:50:45pm

re: #315 Walter L. Newton

Hey asshole. You can say what ever the fuck you want to, but you're not going to get much traction here. We do a good enough job of discussing certain beliefs here without dissing another faith.

So, I don't give two shits about your facts, but I would recommend that you keep you're nasty comments off of here.

If you want to DISCUSS a topic, fine. This thread wasn't even about Mormons. You were trying to pick a fight.

So, guess what butthead, you lost.

Oh, and I'm an atheist, so I have no dog in this fight, but you sir, are a jerk.

dont use "we" when you talking about you own point of view....

324 itellu3times  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:51:56pm

re: #274 wolfie

It's more than a little strong. And yes, I know, it's repeated all over the place.

You hit the nail on the head, really. You don't have to have a PhD in genetics to be a surgeon. You don't have to know a damned thing about paleontology to be a nurse. Why, even a practicing, creationist Muslim (gasp!) can be an excellent dentist!

You may be braver than I in that regard.

Years ago, needing a new dentists, a chose a name at random from the phone book and went and stuck my head in the office to look around. There were all sorts of fancy handicrafts posted in the lobby, and the receptionist said they were all the work of the dentist! He was very good, ... and of course promptly moved away to Las Vegas. I never knew his religious or scientific background, needless to say.

OTOH, I've had dentists still eager to put more amalgam fillings in my head. Especially given the cosmetically superior alternatives today, that sounds like a bad idea to me. One can debate the science, of course, but it doesn't sound like great science or medicine. Old boys not keeping up with progress is probably a worse problem than their metaphysical leanings.

325 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:52:19pm

re: #323 albusteve

dont use "we" when you talking about you own point of view....

Sorry.

326 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:52:19pm

re: #320 David IV of Georgia

You read my mind. Exactly what I was driving at about not being willing to fight.

It blows my mind, so much of our population can google Brittany Spears but not have any clue as to the evil that lurks within.

327 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:52:48pm

re: #323 albusteve

dont use "we" when you talking about you own point of view....

fight!

328 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:52:53pm

re: #319 yochanan

to me this thread is disappointing and i am not even a Christian. if i was i would be upset. not very nice.

Me, neither, but I wouldn't call the thread topic disappointing.
Where it seems to be headed ....

329 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:53:17pm

re: #327 Big Steve

fight!

no thanks...drink!

330 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:53:33pm

re: #307 wolfie

I really don't know much about Rick Warren, and won't judge him one way or another on snippets of info, but I suspect that is the money quote on this thread!

I don't actually know much about him either. I suspect that he would be the quiet pastor of a moderate sized church never having his beliefs placed under hard scrutiny except for the publicity he received from his book.

331 irish rose  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:53:45pm

Pastor Rick Warren:

The Bible tells in Genesis 1 that God made the world in seven days, and that he made all of the animals on the fifth day and the sixth day. All of the animals were created at the same time, so they all walked the earth at the same time.

Peter:

2 Peter 3:8 - But do not let this one {fact} escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day.

332 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:54:45pm

re: #329 albusteve

no thanks...drink!

damn.....I was looking for some action.

333 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:54:54pm

re: #315 Walter L. Newton


Hit a hot button, did I ? ROFLMAO

Your response is hilarious...I wasn't picking a fight. All I did was reference a known fact.........and YOU explode like a bipolar adolescent.

Get over yourself.

Oh yeah....BTW...Lost what? :)

334 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:55:48pm

re: #303 formercorpsman

You won't find me mocking the sincerely-held ethical beliefs of Christians, or Jews, or most other religions. There certainly is plenty of mock-worthy material to be found in islam, and in scientology, for that matter.

Usually the mocking kicks in when some self-identified believer attempts to impose his nonsensical beliefs about some rather trivial side-issue upon the rest of us, or as is the case here, apparently tries to hide his beliefs on certain issues for political gain. Hypocrisy is always eminently mockable.

335 Charles  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:55:48pm

re: #319 yochanan

to me this thread is disappointing and i am not even a Christian. if i was i would be upset. not very nice.

The battleground of ideas is not supposed to be "nice."

336 Quintus_Arius  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:55:59pm

re: #23 Ojoe

Giving Christianity a bad name.™

...

I'll stick with Pope Benedict, and John XXIII.

I'll stick with Pope Benedict, and John XXIII.

Amen! and Merry Christmas to all!~

337 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:55:59pm

re: #332 Big Steve

damn.....I was looking for some action.

keep reading you trouble maker....first pass the Red Stripe

338 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:56:02pm

re: #310 FrogMarch

Birds are hard to keep. I tried giving mine a room where she could be out of her cage all the time, and she started feather picking almost immediately. She'd rather be in her small cage where she can see me than be out of it and not. I tried letting her out in my bedroom, and she turned a chest of drawers into a nest. So she stays in her cage, and I pet her every day.

339 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:56:12pm

re: #317 Big Steve

There are pluses to being a member of the LDS church. :)

340 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:56:14pm

re: #322 Thanos

[Link: www.youtube.com...]

That's a nice song. Who is that?

btw- anyone know - Can a cat owner own a pet bird without total mayhem? Am I asking for trouble?

341 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:56:46pm

re: #334 Alberta Oil Peon

Without a doubt.

342 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:57:01pm

re: #182 Summer

I think I understand what you are saying; but have you asked why, if that is the case, he did not show such tolerant thinking in the many ethical (sorry, religious) calls he has made.

Seems to me he has been guilty of the same sort of pandering that Obama clearly has been practicing.

/but hey, they are politicians and we vote for politicians, don't we?

343 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:57:05pm

re: #337 albusteve

keep reading you trouble maker....first pass the Red Stripe

No thanks, no commie beers for me.....I'll drink American/

344 mikalm  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:57:10pm

re: #331 irish rose

Exactly. For the Lord of Creation, chronological time is very different than it is for us mortal creatures.

345 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:57:15pm

Religion of peace at work in restive Thailand.....

Thailand : CCTV Captures Motorcycle Bomb Kill Mother,Severely Injure Her Children.
Not graphic but still disturbing.

346 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:57:17pm

i find secularism to be an empty life style which leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything

347 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:57:36pm

re: #335 Charles

The battleground of ideas is not supposed to be "nice."

Charles -- I'm hoping you don't have a problem with civil, though.

348 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:58:01pm

re: #340 FrogMarch

That's a nice song. Who is that?

btw- anyone know - Can a cat owner own a pet bird without total mayhem? Am I asking for trouble?

It's an old standard from Jazz / fusion days. Lots of groups do it, I forget who did the original but it's pretty good, much better than the group in that vid.

349 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:58:06pm

re: #340 FrogMarch

That's a nice song. Who is that?

btw- anyone know - Can a cat owner own a pet bird without total mayhem? Am I asking for trouble?

For about 3 minutes.

350 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:58:19pm

re: #338 Iron Fist

Birds are hard to keep. I tried giving mine a room where she could be out of her cage all the time, and she started feather picking almost immediately. She'd rather be in her small cage where she can see me than be out of it and not. I tried letting her out in my bedroom, and she turned a chest of drawers into a nest. So she stays in her cage, and I pet her every day.

Interesting. Sounds like many birds just want companionship.

351 Basho  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:59:46pm

re: #346 yochanan

i find secularism to be an empty life style which leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything

Yet many secularists live happy lives.

352 Charles  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 5:59:49pm

re: #347 jwb7605

Charles -- I'm hoping you don't have a problem with civil, though.

That's why the 'report' exclamation point exists.

353 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:00:24pm

re: #339 fclass308

There are pluses to being a member of the LDS church. :)

I spent two days on a ski trip to SLC with a Mormon girl who had been excommunicated for living with the friend I was visiting...very enlightening...she was hot as hell and just a wonderful girl...she pulled no punched with the church...I dont really judge from there but it was certainly insightful...we are all different in some ways...this is a good thing and enrichens all our lives

354 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:00:47pm

re: #346 yochanan


i find secularism to be an empty life style which leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything


Me too, maybe that's why I enjoy it so much.

355 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:01:00pm

re: #346 yochanan

i find secularism to be an empty life style which leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything

Now see I don't understand that statement one bit. I consider myself atheistic. However, I value life immensely because I am convinced that it is the only one we get. When we auger in there is no heaven, no afterlife, so what we have now is all we get. Therefore it is the most precious commodity imaginable. And the life of others is equally precious for the same reason. I have to see that IMO there has been far more evil perpetrated by those that believe in God than those who don't.

356 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:01:29pm

re: #343 Big Steve

No thanks, no commie beers for me.....I'll drink American/

ha!...the Jamaicans have not gone red yet...some very near misses tho!

357 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:01:42pm

re: #351 Basho

Yet many secularists live happy lives.

communism and fascism both came out of radical secularism

358 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:01:45pm

re: #282 fclass308

I got most of my understanding of that faith from a member of the Young family from Provo, had an ancestor named Brigham. I do however generally refrain from speaking about what I think about that here.

359 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:02:16pm

re: #357 yochanan

Goodwin Ackbar!

360 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:02:40pm

re: #357 yochanan

communism and fascism both came out of radical secularism

The inquisition came from the church.....want to keep this up?

361 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:03:12pm

re: #346 yochanan

i find secularism to be an empty life style which leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything

I have the same problem with secularism that I have with fantasy (as opposed to science fiction):

If there are no ground rules (grounded), you can change the rules during the game.
Sooner or later you end up with a serious problem when you do that, and you don't have a ground rule to refer to.

Right, wrong, or indifferent, nobody gets to change the end of the story.

Removing a page describing your beliefs is an attempt to do that, too.

362 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:03:15pm

re: #336 Quintus_Arius

I'll stick with Pope Benedict, and John XXIII.

Amen! and Merry Christmas to all!~

I'll stick to Pope Saint Gregory the Great and Pope St. Leo the Great....

363 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:03:19pm

re: #355 Big Steve

v.i. lenin, leon trosky, joe stalin, mao, che, ho. snicklegruber were all athiests

364 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:03:33pm

Just an interesting observation. When a subject comes up on LGF that deals with a Christian topic, some Lizards can get so worked up, to the point that the suggestion always comes up that this blog is "trashing" Christianity. And there is a lot of support here for not keeping idea at least civil.

But, when someone makes a snide remark about Mormons, or some other more esoteric religious sect, it seems it's basically open season, anything goes.

Interesting, to say the least.

365 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:03:44pm

re: #346 yochanan

i imagine secularism to be an empty life style which I imagine leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything that I understand

/fixed

366 notutopia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:04:20pm

re: #348 Thanos

It's a Beautiful Day...re: #348 Thanos

It's an old standard from Jazz / fusion days. Lots of groups do it, I forget who did the original but it's pretty good, much better than the group in that vid.

367 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:04:21pm

re: #363 yochanan

v.i. lenin, leon trosky, joe stalin, mao, che, ho. snicklegruber were all athiests

Hitler was a Christian

368 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:04:28pm

re: #349 Walter L. Newton

For about 3 minutes.

fun for the cats.
(I found the cutest bird who needs rescuing. I suppose it won't work. I'd have to quarantine the poor bird.

369 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:04:38pm

it was leon trotsky that destroyed the russian jewish comm.

370 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:04:57pm

re: #90 Killgore Trout

Jesus never said when or how often believers should observe the Lord's Supper. He instituted it on a Thursday night.


Thursday? Huh.

Note that this is an example of a Christian taking literal-mindedness to an Amelia Bedelia level, it's not strictly a fundamentalist thing.

At face value, the Gospel account does tend to create the appearance that Jesus was arrested, put on trial, and crucified within the span of mere hours -- and many generations of Christians have missed the point that the Gospel narrative of the Passion is highly time-compressed. Adding to the confusion is the fact that the "Easter week" tradition of Christian churches reflects the time-compressed Gospel story.

As a result, countless millions of Christians just take it for granted that:

Jesus came riding into Jerusalem the day after the Jewish Sabbath (commemorated as Palm Sunday -- or "Pussy Willow Sunday" if you're Russian Orthodox!);

that on the Thursday immediately following, he had his "Last Supper" with the 12 Apostles and was arrested that same evening;

that between dinner on Thursday and before sundown on Friday, he was brought before Pilate and then before Herod and then before Pilate again and THEN was marched to Golgotha and THEN nailed to the Cross and THEN died and was taken off the cross and buried;

and then finally was Resurrected "three" days later, on Easter Sunday.

Again, none of this is actually specified in the Gospel account (apart from the Crucifixion occurring quite soon before the beginning of Sabbath).

371 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:05:30pm

re: #364 Walter L. Newton

Just an interesting observation. When a subject comes up on LGF that deals with a Christian topic, some Lizards can get so worked up, to the point that the suggestion always comes up that this blog is "trashing" Christianity. And there is a lot of support here for not keeping idea at least civil.

But, when someone makes a snide remark about Mormons, or some other more esoteric religious sect, it seems it's basically open season, anything goes.

Interesting, to say the least.

From personal experience, it's not only Mormons.
That's the price you pay, though, if you're not one of the 90+ percent.

372 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:05:34pm

re: #363 yochanan

v.i. lenin, leon trosky, joe stalin, mao, che, ho. snicklegruber were all athiests

I suppose you are going to claim that Madoff was too?

373 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:05:47pm

re: #367 Big Steve

Hitler was a Christian

snicklegruber was as much a pagen his worship of germaness predated christianity.

374 Big Steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:05:48pm

re: #369 yochanan

it was leon trotsky that destroyed the russian jewish comm.

Bin Laden......Dinnerjacket......Sadaam......all God fearing.

375 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:05:59pm

re: #340 FrogMarch

re: #350 FrogMarch

We have two cats and two birds. You want to make sure that the cats can't get at the birds, but it isn't hard to do. OTOH, I used to have a ferret or a weasel (he was found loose in the wild, but he'd been neutered. He was a very large ferret, if ferret he was). We accidently let him slip out of his area one night, and he killed a cockatiel. He was right proud of himself.

Yeah, tame birds, especially hand raised ones, want companionship. They become bonded to a person, and can be difficult for other people to get near. My big bird is an African Gray parrot. She has hated every woman I've dated since I got her, and she'll bite if she's given the chance.

376 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:06:50pm

re: #357 yochanan

communism and fascism both came out of radical secularism

Communism got its very governmental structure from the Catholic Church, and its people were willing to submit to the commisar because they were used to submitting to czar and priest.

The German people were likewise overwhelmingly Christian, and the antisemitism that the Nazis morphed into the Holocaust had its ancestral roots in both Catholic and Protestant Christianity.

377 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:07:03pm

re: #372 Naso Tang

not nice madoff doesn't have anything to do with it one way or the other

378 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:07:03pm

re: #368 FrogMarch

fun for the cats.
(I found the cutest bird who needs rescuing. I suppose it won't work. I'd have to quarantine the poor bird.

What kind of bird? When I was married and had a house, I had a whole room full of rescue birds. Now, in this little apartment, it's just Maisey the parrot and me.

379 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:07:13pm

re: #364 Walter L. Newton

Just an interesting observation. When a subject comes up on LGF that deals with a Christian topic, some Lizards can get so worked up, to the point that the suggestion always comes up that this blog is "trashing" Christianity. And there is a lot of support here for not keeping idea at least civil.

But, when someone makes a snide remark about Mormons, or some other more esoteric religious sect, it seems it's basically open season, anything goes.

Interesting, to say the least.

personally I didnt see it as snide...but if thats what you think keep your snide remarks about Islam to yourself...thanks

380 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:07:32pm

re: #364 Walter L. Newton

You get used to it after a while.

381 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:08:01pm

re: #355 Big Steve

Now see I don't understand that statement one bit. I consider myself atheistic. However, I value life immensely because I am convinced that it is the only one we get. When we auger in there is no heaven, no afterlife, so what we have now is all we get. Therefore it is the most precious commodity imaginable. And the life of others is equally precious for the same reason. I have to see that IMO there has been far more evil perpetrated by those that believe in God than those who don't.


Mr. Stalin and Mr. Mao disagree. With zeros on the end.

382 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:08:21pm

re: #363 yochanan

v.i. lenin, leon trosky, joe stalin, mao, che, ho. snicklegruber were all athiests

Oh, they believed in a Supreme Being, alright. Just that the Supreme Being was their own self, or Karl Marx, as the case may be. They simply made a cult of the State. Not really secular at all.

383 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:08:43pm

re: #376 Salamantis

Communism got its very governmental structure from the Catholic Church, and its people were willing to submit to the commisar because they were used to submitting to czar and priest.

The German people were likewise overwhelmingly Christian, and the antisemitism that the Nazis morphed into the Holocaust had its ancestral roots in both Catholic and Protestant Christianity.

ROFLMAO BLAMING CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR COMMUNISM SHOWS MORE OF YOUR BIGOTRY DIRECTED AT THE CHURCH AS COMMUNISM IS MILITANT SECULARISM AND ANTI RELIGION.

384 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:08:57pm

re: #363 yochanan

v.i. lenin, leon trosky, joe stalin, mao, che, ho. snicklegruber were all athiests

Actually, Adolph Hitler remarked to General Gerhard Engel, his chief of staff, in 1941 that he would always remain a committed Catholic. And in fact, the first treaty the Third Reich signed was with the Holy See.

385 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:09:03pm

Ahemm.

Yochanan has been around a while. Why is everyone treating him like a troll who hasn't read any of this stuff before?

386 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:09:04pm

re: #353 albusteve

I agree.

They are, for the most part, decent, hard working, moral folks. I have no quarrel with the people, just the doctrine.

But I am not going to discuss it further here. Notwithstanding Walter's ballistic diatribe, I don't care to stir up any trouble with any Mormon Lizards with references to the inner workings of the religion.

Tolerance is a good thing. :)

And Walter....you owe me an apology for your inappropriate remarks. ;)

387 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:09:06pm

re: #367 Big Steve

Hitler was a Christian

No, he wasn't.

388 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:09:21pm

re: #382 Alberta Oil Peon

TOTALLY SECULAR.

389 notutopia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:09:23pm

re: #368 FrogMarch

I have successfully had cats that are fine with birds kept in an aquarium/terrarium environment with a sturdy metal mesh screen for the top covering. Finches. The cats sit and stare at them but the birds are quite safe. Cages however, have been a disaster for the birds welfare.

390 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:11:16pm
391 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:11:18pm

re: #376 Salamantis
Mblockquote>
Communism got its very governmental structure from the Catholic Church, and its people were willing to submit to the commisar because they were used to submitting to czar and priest.
Have you got a link for that? I studied Marxism under a real Communist and I guarantee you he didn't think they were getting their governmental structure from the Catholic Church.

Marx himself was, as I'm sure you know, rabidly anti-Religion. And atheism was the State Religion of the Soviet Union.

392 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:12:04pm

re: #360 Big Steve

The inquisition came from the church.....want to keep this up?

re: #367 Big Steve

Hitler was a Christian

So you don't like Catholics or are you merely recounting that they have had some problems in the past? You forgot to mention that the pope himself okayed the marriage of Hitler's parents, who were first cousins.
/See interbreeding does work....

393 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:12:12pm

re: #379 albusteve

personally I didnt see it as snide...but if thats what you think keep your snide remarks about Islam to yourself...thanks

I think you would have trouble finding any snide remarks from me about Islam. I have made informed remarks about Islam, Muslims and how there existence effects our planet, but snide, when it comes to religion, not my style.

394 J.S.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:13:09pm

re: #368 FrogMarch

I have a cat (plus finches). The finches aren't really tame-able (so they stay in their cages -- very large cages/aviary-style). the cat ignores them (since he can't get at them). Anyway, it works out -- although if the finches ever flew out of their cages (escaped), and the cat was around, I guess the birds would be in trouble...(you just need to take certain precautions -- such as locking the cat in the bathroom when cleaning bird cages.).

395 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:13:32pm

re: #387 MandyManners

No, he wasn't.

He was, by all normal standards of background and statements of his own; which is however, not to say that it was his alleged Christianity that caused him to be what he was, any more than that was what caused the majority of Christian Germans to follow him.

396 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:13:36pm

re: #380 Killgore Trout

You get used to it after a while.

All I was suggesting is that Mormons deserve as much civilness when we are discussing their religion as we give to Christianity.

I guess that doesn't apply.

397 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:13:44pm

re: #386 fclass308

I agree.

They are, for the most part, decent, hard working, moral folks. I have no quarrel with the people, just the doctrine.

But I am not going to discuss it further here. Notwithstanding Walter's ballistic diatribe, I don't care to stir up any trouble with any Mormon Lizards with references to the inner workings of the religion.

Tolerance is a good thing. :)

And Walter....you owe me an apology for your inappropriate remarks. ;)

There are usually 3 kinds of [insert religion here]
1- those that are signed up, but non-practicing
2- those that practice, and leave you alone.
3- nutcases

I might be wrong, but that's what I've empirically observed in 60 years of life.

398 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:14:13pm

re: #373 yochanan

snicklegruber was as much a pagen his worship of germaness predated christianity.

Yes, but there are several quotes from him that tend to show that's not the whole of it, and his Wehrmacht marched with belt buckles inscribed "Gott mitt uns".

399 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:14:22pm

COMMUNISM was militant secularism TOTALLY ANTI RELIGION which is why the jewish communists murdered all parts of the russian jewish community.

400 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:14:39pm

re: #386 fclass308

I agree.

They are, for the most part, decent, hard working, moral folks. I have no quarrel with the people, just the doctrine.

But I am not going to discuss it further here. Notwithstanding Walter's ballistic diatribe, I don't care to stir up any trouble with any Mormon Lizards with references to the inner workings of the religion.

Tolerance is a good thing. :)

And Walter....you owe me an apology for your inappropriate remarks. ;)

In a crabs ass I do!

401 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:15:05pm

re: #375 Iron Fist

re: #350 FrogMarch

We have two cats and two birds. You want to make sure that the cats can't get at the birds, but it isn't hard to do. OTOH, I used to have a ferret or a weasel (he was found loose in the wild, but he'd been neutered. He was a very large ferret, if ferret he was). We accidently let him slip out of his area one night, and he killed a cockatiel. He was right proud of himself.

Yeah, tame birds, especially hand raised ones, want companionship. They become bonded to a person, and can be difficult for other people to get near. My big bird is an African Gray parrot. She has hated every woman I've dated since I got her, and she'll bite if she's given the chance.

Thank you for telling me that. I'll take your advise. My primary concern is making sure the cats can't get to it, my other concern is making sure I have enough time to devote to the bird so it doesn't go crazy.

Is your African Grey a talker?

402 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:15:08pm

re: #397 jwb7605

An astute observation....and I totally concur.

403 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:15:29pm

re: #387 MandyManners

If you read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich there is an entire long section about what Hitler called the "New Order". He intended that a kind of neo-paganism, where Mein Kampf was the "holy" text and the sword replaced the crucifix, to ultimately be the "spiritual" life in the Third Reich.

404 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:15:52pm

re: #400 Walter L. Newton


Then go pound sand, goober. :)

405 Steffan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:16:16pm

re: #367 Big Steve

Hitler was a Christian

Actually, no. He wanted to abolish Christianity.

"During his rise to power Hitler -- in many respects the heir of the Bismarckian progressives -- could hardly launch an all-out attack on Christianity. National Socialism, after all, was supposed to unite all Germans. It's 'not opportune to hurl ourselves now into a struggle with the Churches. The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death,' Hitler explained to his aides. 'A slow death has something comforting about it. The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science. Religion will have to make more and more concessions. Gradually the myths crumble. All that's left is to prove that in nature there is no frontier between the organic and the inorganic.'"

--Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism, pg. 363

406 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:16:41pm

re: #393 Walter L. Newton

I think you would have trouble finding any snide remarks from me about Islam. I have made informed remarks about Islam, Muslims and how there existence effects our planet, but snide, when it comes to religion, not my style.

your awfully quick to lay that term on others tho....it's your call tho...his post was something less than snide but I dislike being judgemental in these cases...maybe you should try it...dump the caps and quit calling people names

407 SFGoth  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:16:51pm

re: #346 yochanan

i find secularism to be an empty life style which leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything

And what religion has not led to evil? I find my secular lifestyle to be quite full. Friday night I had dinner at Lefty O'Doul's with my elderly parents, then went to a club to see friends; Sat. I went to Victorian ballroom dance practice and then the formal ball that night, thence to another club for more friends; Sun. I attended Dickens Fair with more dancing and a bit of drinking. Dried off and fed the stray kitty when he showed up Sun. night. Back at work on important legal issues. What's so empty?

408 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:16:57pm

re: #398 Thanos

german during ww1 had the same thing

409 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:17:39pm

re: #193 buzzsawmonkey

Yes! Yes! Pray for the carnivores!

Personally, I pray for all those poor carnivores who had to sit around with grumbly tummies, just waiting for the Fall of Man to introduce Death into Creation so that they could all nosh on sweet succulent bloody flesh...

WOLF: Hey, look, everybody, it's the Snake!
VELOCIRAPTOR: Yo, Snake -- has the bitch eaten the apple yet?
LEOPARD SEAL: Yeah, dude, I've got penguin-munchies like you wouldn't believe. Along with pointy teeth that are just going to waste.
SNAKE: [in Peter Lorre voice]  No, sssssorry... still working on her.
OWL: Well, shake a leg, slacker! (No offense about the leg thing.)

410 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:18:37pm

re: #406 albusteve

your awfully quick to lay that term on others tho....it's your call tho...his post was something less than snide but I dislike being judgemental in these cases...maybe you should try it...dump the caps and quit calling people names

I apologized to you for using the global "we." You are right, his comment wasn't snide, it was bigoted.

411 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:18:55pm

re: #378 Walter L. Newton

What kind of bird? When I was married and had a house, I had a whole room full of rescue birds. Now, in this little apartment, it's just Maisey the parrot and me.

I don't know. The sign was missing and the only person there was the young "dude" at the cash register. The bird wasn't real large, and it had bright yellow,orange and green feathers. There was another bird who was black with multi-colored feathers. He was a mess.
Is Maisey easy to care for?

412 solomonpanting  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:19:03pm

re: #355 Big Steve

I have to see that IMO there has been far more evil perpetrated by those that believe in God than those who don't.

Maybe. But communism killed tens of millions more.

413 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:19:19pm

re: #383 yochanan

ROFLMAO BLAMING CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR COMMUNISM SHOWS MORE OF YOUR BIGOTRY DIRECTED AT THE CHURCH AS COMMUNISM IS MILITANT SECULARISM AND ANTI RELIGION.

Damn, Sam! Playing the bigot-calling card - the last refuge of leftist scoundrels, so early! You must have nothing else, except for your irrational visceral animus to all that is not an ideological clone of yourself. Kinda like Bin Laden and Zawahiri in that regard. See; I can do it as well as you can. And it's just as fucking true as your bare assertion.

And here is a graduate level essay in Comparative Religion that made and supported the very same assertion that you just gratuitously ad hominem-ed me for; it got me an A:

The Human Dialectic of Absolute Premises:
Christianity and Marxism
[Link: blog.myspace.com...]

You're the fucking bigot; an anti-secular bigot. And you're proud of it; you trumpet it to the skies.

414 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:19:21pm

re: #401 FrogMarch

She talks some. What is interesting is that she sometimes seems to really understand what she is saying. When she's frustrated, she curses. She is a very loud bird. She loves to sqawk and whistle. I've had her for 15 years or so. She's difficult at times, but I'm really glad to have her.

415 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:19:46pm

re: #396 Walter L. Newton

All I was suggesting is that Mormons deserve as much civilness when we are discussing their religion as we give to Christianity.

I guess that doesn't apply.

Well, there can be good arguments for giving something new a harder time than something old. It's practiced on LGF all the time.

One difference between Christians and Mormons is that the bible is The Word, period, whereas the Mormons have to deal with the fact that "the other side of the story" is very well documented.

416 ornery elephant  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:19:57pm

When I go to that Google cache of what used to be up on the site, I find nothing there. Is that link not working?

417 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:20:12pm

re: #399 yochanan

COMMUNISM was militant secularism TOTALLY ANTI RELIGION which is why the jewish communists murdered all parts of the russian jewish community.

But the whole point is that they worked assiduously to replace the worship of God by the worship of the State, and the high priests of Communism.

To the poor dumb sap in the streets, there's not much difference between Soviet Russia and Cromwell's England, or today's Saudi Arabia. You take your direction from the Holy Book of the State, and take your marching orders from the High Priests, or your ass is grass. Reason is right out of the question.

418 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:20:20pm

re: #389 notutopia

Thanks!

419 SFGoth  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:20:23pm

re: #363 yochanan

v.i. lenin, leon trosky, joe stalin, mao, che, ho. snicklegruber were all athiests

There've probably been a lot more religious tyrants than non-religious until the 20th c. Now, the religious ones, except for the [bigoted word]s and certain other religions, have been emasculated. Cortez did a wonderful job spreading Catholicism to the Mesoamericans.

420 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:20:40pm

re: #408 yochanan

german during ww1 had the same thing

... and somehow WWI was ok? If you recall they used gas on everyone in the trenches during that war, not just the Jews. Distance has made some forget the horror of that war.

421 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:20:47pm

re: #355 Big Steve

Big Steve, I mean no disrespect, but you might want to research that last sentence a little bit more.

422 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:20:59pm

re: #391 Iron Fist

Mblockquote>
Communism got its very governmental structure from the Catholic Church, and its people were willing to submit to the commisar because they were used to submitting to czar and priest.
Have you got a link for that? I studied Marxism under a real Communist and I guarantee you he didn't think they were getting their governmental structure from the Catholic Church.

Marx himself was, as I'm sure you know, rabidly anti-Religion. And atheism was the State Religion of the Soviet Union.

[Link: blog.myspace.com...]

423 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:21:27pm

re: #315 Walter L. Newton

Hey asshole. You can say what ever the fuck you want to, but you're not going to get much traction here. We do a good enough job of discussing certain beliefs here without dissing another faith.

So, I don't give two shits about your facts, but I would recommend that you keep you're nasty comments off of here.

If you want to DISCUSS a topic, fine. This thread wasn't even about Mormons. You were trying to pick a fight.

So, guess what butthead, you lost.

Oh, and I'm an atheist, so I have no dog in this fight, but you sir, are a jerk.

is this civil Walter?...

424 SFGoth  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:21:34pm

re: #367 Big Steve

Hitler was a Christian

He actually admired Islam b/c it wasn't afraid to wipe people out with whom it disagreed with, unlike modern Christianity.

425 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:21:49pm

re: #396 Walter L. Newton

It is an odd phenomenon that the older the silliness is the more "respectable" it becomes. Scientology and Mormonism are relatively new on the scene so people find it easier to mock. If I say god spoke to me and I was eaten by a whale last week people would laugh at me but if I claimed the same thing happen 2,000 years ago then it becomes more socially acceptable. I think it's just human nature.

426 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:22:18pm

re: #409 Throbert McGee

Very good. One small suggestion:

WOLF: Hey, look, everybody, it's the Snake! [cue Snake theme music, which sounds like the music from "Twin Peaks" whenever "Bobby" appeared]

427 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:22:18pm

re: #391 Iron Fist


Communism got its very governmental structure from the Catholic Church, and its people were willing to submit to the commisar because they were used to submitting to czar and priest.

IIRC, Stalin was an Orthodox monk at one time. Russian communists who came of age in Russia were either part of or in rebellion against the Orthodox church, not the Roman Catholics.

428 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:22:31pm

re: #394 J.S.

I have a cat (plus finches). ....-
(chop)
.... locking the cat in the bathroom when cleaning bird cages.).

Another successful cat/bird situation. that's great! & that last bit is a good idea. Thanks.

429 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:22:39pm

re: #411 FrogMarch

The yellow and gold bird sounds like a sun conure. They are very pretty.

430 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:23:05pm
431 legalpad  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:23:23pm

I see Hitler has made it into the mix again.

See what you think of these comments.

432 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:23:29pm

re: #421 formercorpsman

Big Steve, I mean no disrespect, but you might want to research that last sentence a little bit more.

would this fix it? (I just mentally inserted it when I read it)

IMO there has been far more evil perpetrated by those that claim to believe in God than those who don't.
433 FlakMusic  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:24:06pm

Quoting buzzsawmonkey:

I do not recall any penetrator/penetrated distinctions applied to homosexual behavior in the Torah; if you know of one, I'd be interested to learn it.

I didn't say that was a Torah distinction. I'm saying that in the ancient world the notion of homosexuality per se didn't exist...so it's therefore no surprise that there's no Hebrew term for it. What was prohibited in the Torah was same sex sex.

These things--language used, position, context--tend to indicate that the proscription was originally aimed at idolatrous ritual.

I disagree. I don't think the prohibitions occur only in that context (either in the Torah or the New Testament). The story of Sodom is but one example. I also don't see any historical evidence that the Hebrews limited the application of the prohibition to temple prostitution...I see the opposite. Israel was unique in ancient world, to my knowledge, in that homosexual behavior was not common...in fact, that's an understatement.

As far back as the Talmud goes, the prohibition against homosexual activity was general. But one must remember that the Talmudic rabbis there recorded only go back as far as the beginning of Greek domination of the Eastern Mediterranean, and that pederasty was a common Greek practice.

The Greek practices were unambiguously condemned by Paul, who was a (reformed) pharisee, an expert in the Torah.

Thus, it is by no means inconceivable that the prohibition which began with the purpose of keeping the Jews away from Canaanite temples and their homosexual rituals was further extended by the early Talmudists, in the spirit of "building a fence around the Torah", to discourage the assimilation of Jews into the more widely pederastic Greek society.

I think the fence idea is entirely correct (it's consistent with other cultural markers that made Israel a distinct society)...but I don't think that the relevant passages in the Torah can be legitimately interpreted as only applying to temple prostitution or pagan rituals.

434 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:24:24pm

re: #376 Salamantis

Communism got its very governmental structure from the Catholic Church, and its people were willing to submit to the commisar because they were used to submitting to czar and priest.

And the Catholic Church got its structure from the Roman Empire. Not much new under the sun.

435 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:24:24pm

re: #411 FrogMarch

I don't know. The sign was missing and the only person there was the young "dude" at the cash register. The bird wasn't real large, and it had bright yellow,orange and green feathers. There was another bird who was black with multi-colored feathers. He was a mess.
Is Maisey easy to care for?

No. Well, it depends on what easy to care for means. You can water her and feed her and leave her alone, and she will probably live, but that's only part of what it takes to care for a parrot.

They are very social birds. They will bound with a single human much as they would another parrot mate.

They need to be near where you are, not tucked away in a quiet part of the house. They love input, noise, things happening around them.

They enjoy you talking to them, they like the input.

They will get depressed if you don't pay attention to them. Pick feathers, sulk, tear things up if they can get ahold of items, just like a spoiled child.

The are "dirty." In the sense that seed goes all around the cage, out of the cage and in places you never expect. The poop when ever they want, where ever they are, you couch, your shoulder, you hand.

Otherwise, I love every minute of them.

436 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:24:48pm

re: #427 Jim in Virginia

Right, the secularists got mostly wiped in the war of the red and the white.

437 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:25:24pm

re: #413 Salamantis

dialectical materialism has more to with Hegel dialectical method than Christian belief

the huge number of Church's and shuls the communists destroyed make your joke of blaming Christianity for Marxism a total joke

if you want to trace Marxism back you should look at the french revolution instead and the Paris commune.

but your person dislike for me makes any debate on ANY ISSUE TO BE WORTHLESS

438 golly_wog  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:25:30pm

re: #401 FrogMarch

Thank you for telling me that. I'll take your advise. My primary concern is making sure the cats can't get to it, my other concern is making sure I have enough time to devote to the bird so it doesn't go crazy.

Is your African Grey a talker?

My cats have never been able to intimidate my parrots. The parrots wander across the floor, and when a cat comes up from behind, the parrot doesn't run, he just turns around with that big can opener on his face and looks at the cat like "WHUT?" The cat acts like he was just looking and beats a retreat.

439 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:26:00pm

re: #429 Iron Fist
Are they as raucous as their Cherry Head cousins? I had one once and he was the noisiest bird I have ever heard..

440 Shiplord Kirel  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:26:40pm

Meanwhile, not a word about this from evolution crusader, science advocate, and self-styled Bad Astronomer Phil Plait. Phil is president of the James Randi Educational Foundation, no less. There is no heavier mojo in the world of organized skepticism than that, so Warren should be an obvious target for him, right?
Well, it just happens that Phil is also a major supporter of the Obamessiah and all his works.
It's creepy, enough to make even me believe in conspiracy theories, to see the extent to which the normally fundy-hating media and their fellow travelers have covered up the worst of Warren's whackiness, now that the One has embraced him.

441 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:26:52pm

re: #429 Iron Fist

The yellow and gold bird sounds like a sun conure. They are very pretty.

A per capita, the LOUDEST birds in the parrot world. I had a bunch of them over the years. They are the darling little birds, but a handful.

442 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:28:10pm

re: #425 Killgore Trout

It is an odd phenomenon that the older the silliness is the more "respectable" it becomes. Scientology and Mormonism are relatively new on the scene so people find it easier to mock. If I say god spoke to me and I was eaten by a whale last week people would laugh at me but if I claimed the same thing happen 2,000 years ago then it becomes more socially acceptable. I think it's just human nature.

No kidding.

443 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:28:21pm

re: #430 buzzsawmonkey

Well, I would confess to having been eaten by a whale once, except that there are certain chapters of my sordid dating history I'd rather forget.

You said that you and Ms. O'Donnell were just friends!

444 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:28:34pm

re: #432 jwb7605

There is no escaping history, my church is responsible for some horrible things.

But one of the most intriguing aspects of secularism, is the rise of the cult of personality within it.

It seems almost to go hand in hand.

445 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:28:39pm

re: #414 Iron Fist

She talks some. What is interesting is that she sometimes seems to really understand what she is saying. When she's frustrated, she curses. She is a very loud bird. She loves to sqawk and whistle. I've had her for 15 years or so. She's difficult at times, but I'm really glad to have her.

15 years, she curses when frustrated, and she hates your girlfriends. I think what you've got there is a wife. ;-)

thanks for sharing the info. I had no idea so many LGFers were bird owners. cool.

446 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:29:05pm

re: #440 Shiplord Kirel

Meanwhile, not a word about this from evolution crusader, science advocate, and self-styled Bad Astronomer Phil Plait. Phil is president of the James Randi Educational Foundation, no less. There is no heavier mojo in the world of organized skepticism than that, so Warren should be an obvious target for him, right?
Well, it just happens that Phil is also a major supporter of the Obamessiah and all his works.
It's creepy, enough to make even me believe in conspiracy theories, to see the extent to which the normally fundy-hating media and their fellow travelers have covered up the worst of Warren's whackiness, now that the One has embraced him.

good catch and very astute observation...the power of the One...beyond creepy

447 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:29:52pm

re: #435 Walter L. Newton

The are "dirty." In the sense that seed goes all around the cage, out of the cage and in places you never expect. The poop when ever they want, where ever they are, you couch, your shoulder, you hand.

Aw, that sounds just like Rugby the Rat! (Peanut Butter Upon Him)

448 Quintus_Arius  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:30:25pm

When all else fails, let's use Hitler. Worked for the Democrats.

449 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:30:26pm

I wonder if Noam's found his mouse yet.

450 Shiplord Kirel  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:30:31pm

If McCain had won and asked Warren to give the invocation, you would see Saddleback's barking mad dinosaur claims plastered all over the front page of every MSM fishwrap on the planet.

451 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:31:00pm

re: #439 fclass308

Are they as raucous as their Cherry Head cousins? I had one once and he was the noisiest bird I have ever heard..

You are correct. They are consider the loudest hook-bill versus thier size, then all of the parrots.

452 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:31:35pm

re: #450 Shiplord Kirel

You nailed it.

453 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:32:26pm

re: #431 legalpad

I see Hitler has made it into the mix again.

See what you think of these comments.

I don't know how much credence to give the first part of that article, since the last part of it repeats the blatant lie that Hitler was inspired by Darwin - a charge that has been conclusively refuted here on LGF on the EVO threads. Neither Dawin nor evolution are mentioned in Mein Kampf, and the Third Reich ordered Darwins books burned.

454 golly_wog  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:33:34pm

re: #452 formercorpsman

You nailed it.

Amen! Whoops, I mean, right on! Whoops I mean......yes!

455 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:34:11pm

re: #433 ...

I see the opposite. Israel was unique in ancient world, to my knowledge, in that homosexual behavior was not common


I think you would have trouble proving that homosexual behavior was less common in Israel than in some (not all) other ancient societies. Greece, sure. Assyria, Egypt- who knows? The texts that have survived condemn at least some forms of same sex behavior; that doesn't mean it was nonexistent or even rare.
There are not supposed to be homosexuals in the US Military.

456 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:34:24pm

re: #444 formercorpsman

There are no cult personalities in Religion? The thing is that evil ideology will adopt the cloak of convenience. Mussolini had a concordance from the Catholic Church for instance, but they later fell out when the Church realized it's mistake. Most VB supporters in Flanders are Catholic. etc. etc.

It's neither secularism nor religion that are responsible for the great evils, it's the evil ideologies and their adherents. Lizards making sweeping statements to provoke a fight about either is just provocative. The ideologies and their adherents are specific, and easy to identify, trying to tar all secularists or all religion is just pimping false dichotomy. We are all lizards and we know who the real enemies are.

457 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:34:27pm

re: #364 Walter L. Newton

Just an interesting observation. When a subject comes up on LGF that deals with a Christian topic, some Lizards can get so worked up, to the point that the suggestion always comes up that this blog is "trashing" Christianity. And there is a lot of support here for not keeping idea at least civil.

But, when someone makes a snide remark about Mormons, or some other more esoteric religious sect, it seems it's basically open season, anything goes.

Interesting, to say the least.

I know next to nothing about Mormons, but what I do know is that they do a heck of a job if you want to purchase bulk foods for storage! They are the BEST, hands down. And they charge like nothing for shipping, whether you purchase 5lbs or 500lbs...it is 4.99 shipping.

458 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:34:50pm

re: #438 golly_wog

My cats have never been able to intimidate my parrots. The parrots wander across the floor, and when a cat comes up from behind, the parrot doesn't run, he just turns around with that big can opener on his face and looks at the cat like "WHUT?" The cat acts like he was just looking and beats a retreat.

I "have" two cats.
One cat loves to sit in front of the aquarium and wait for a fish.
One fish ... seriously ... one particular fish ... seems fond of coming to the glass and checking out the cat.
Which, of course, leads to entertaining scenes to watch. (No way can the cat get to the fish)

My wife seems convinced that the fish is intentionally teasing the cat.
I contend that fish aren't smart enough to do that.

Any idea?

459 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:35:13pm

re: #433 FlakMusic

Israel was unique in ancient world, to my knowledge, in that homosexual behavior was not common

*Shnort*. Let me fix that for you:

Israel was unique in ancient world, to my knowledge, in that homosexual behavior was not common^ly accepted

460 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:35:24pm

re: #438 golly_wog

My cats have never been able to intimidate my parrots. The parrots wander across the floor, and when a cat comes up from behind, the parrot doesn't run, he just turns around with that big can opener on his face and looks at the cat like "WHUT?" The cat acts like he was just looking and beats a retreat.

Two of my three cats would happily, mindlessly, mercilessly, joyfully, viciously rip the bird apart the second it hit the floor.

461 J.S.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:35:47pm

re: #450 Shiplord Kirel

I also got a real laugh when a CNN "pundit" spoke about Caroline Kennedy's wondrous "qualifications" for the Senate while simultaneously crowing about how it's now a "post Palin" world...(in other words, to run for office, one needs to be more/better than merely a "mother with 5 kids" like Palin (talk about liars and hypocrites)).

462 notutopia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:35:55pm

re: #438 golly_wog

No one has yet said how HARD the bite is of a parrot's beak that clamps down. It hurts! and if they bite and don't let go, it can be quite uncomfortable and will break skin. Female parrots are usually quite possessive of the male in the house. What Iron Fist said earlier about having to watch out for his dates..that they don't get bit, is quite true.

463 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:36:01pm
464 Noam Sayin'  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:36:05pm

re: #449 MandyManners

Technically, I'm not looking for him. ;)

465 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:36:08pm

re: #435 Walter L. Newton

Well, that is just what I needed to know. Thank you.

466 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:36:12pm
467 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:36:26pm

re: #454 golly_wog

Forgive me, I am at times dense, and not able to glean jocularity versus mockery.

I don't see you post often, therefore, I am at a loss in discerning.

468 golly_wog  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:36:28pm

re: #458 jwb7605

Any idea?

Is it a catfish?
/

469 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:37:07pm

re: #438 golly_wog

My cats have never been able to intimidate my parrots. The parrots wander across the floor, and when a cat comes up from behind, the parrot doesn't run, he just turns around with that big can opener on his face and looks at the cat like "WHUT?" The cat acts like he was just looking and beats a retreat.

My parrot Maisey, when I was married and we had 4 lap sized dogs, was not bothered by the dogs at all. Almost the same scenario you comment on above would happen between Maisey and the dogs.

470 Floral Giraffe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:37:13pm

Pastor Rick just rolled?

471 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:37:24pm

re: #456 Thanos

SOME WOULD CALL ME AN ENEMY I DOUBT THEY WOULD LIKE ME AT ALL.

472 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:37:55pm
473 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:38:28pm

re: #429 Iron Fist

The yellow and gold bird sounds like a sun conure. They are very pretty.

Could be? Other than all the great info you wonderful LGFers are giving me tonight, I know next to nothing about bird species and their respective qualities. I just know I'm starting to get the bird bug.

474 golly_wog  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:38:43pm

re: #460 FrogMarch

Two of my three cats would happily, mindlessly, mercilessly, joyfully, viciously rip the bird apart the second it hit the floor.


The boys just said "bring 'em on." It might end badly, for the cats. I had one parrot that hunted my cats. She kinked the tail of my Grand Champion Scottish Fold. Not good.

475 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:38:44pm

re: #471 yochanan

Define some, without the all caps please.

476 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:38:52pm
477 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:39:05pm

re: #468 golly_wog

Any idea?

Is it a catfish?
/

made me look!
Nope. It's one of those prehistoric looking things. Not a plecostimus, but about as ugly.

478 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:39:11pm

re: #462 notutopia

No one has yet said how HARD the bite is of a parrot's beak that clamps down. It hurts! and if they bite and don't let go, it can be quite uncomfortable and will break skin. Female parrots are usually quite possessive of the male in the house. What Iron Fist said earlier about having to watch out for his dates..that they don't get bit, is quite true.

I've recounted this here before, but once, I had a girlfriend who Maisey didn't like. We could be sitting on the couch together, watching a movie, and Maisey would climb down her cage (her cage goes to the floor), waddle across the living room rug, and then bite my girlfriend on her toe (open toed-shoes).

479 unrealizedviewpoint  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:39:14pm

re: #457 Wishing

I know next to nothing about Mormons, but what I do know is that they do a heck of a job if you want to purchase bulk foods for storage! They are the BEST, hands down. And they charge like nothing for shipping, whether you purchase 5lbs or 500lbs...it is 4.99 shipping.

linky please.

480 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:39:31pm

re: #463 buzzsawmonkey

Lot had no shotgun, no machine gun, no pistol to protect his house and family

Okay, see, you just lost me on the whole Judeo-Christianity thing right here.

/

481 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:39:48pm

re: #464 Noam Sayin'

Technically, I'm not looking for him. ;)

Maybe you should. With love in your heart. Nice vibes. Honey instead of vinegar.

482 Kragar (proud to be kafir)  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:40:04pm

re: #476 ploome hineni

rolled where?

Details here

483 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:40:14pm

re: #470 Floral Giraffe

Pastor Rick just rolled?

/fixed that for you

484 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:40:15pm

re: #466 ploome hineni

Rick Warren, Billy Graham,Louis Farrakhan and the rev Wright all have built churches on their own cult of personality

and the most ignorant understanding of their respective religions imaginable

its the church of keep it simple stupid

open your wallet and save your heathen soul....monies up front or how can one account for the lavish lifestyle...jus sayin

485 Sounder  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:40:19pm

"Panda’s Thumb points out that Warren is also a creationist."

Of course, he is a Christian Preacher. Nothing wrong with that. As far as taking down web pages, he knows since his selection to give prayer at the coronation this would only be rubbing salt into the wounds of some and he is trying to ease that. Don't blame him.

486 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:40:25pm

re: #463 buzzsawmonkey

Nice commentary. Hypothetically possible even. A simpler point may be that women were not valued as highly as men.

487 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:40:29pm
488 FlakMusic  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:40:47pm

re: #455 Jim in Virginia

I think you would have trouble proving that homosexual behavior was less common in Israel than in some (not all) other ancient societies. Greece, sure. Assyria, Egypt- who knows? The texts that have survived condemn at least some forms of same sex behavior; that doesn't mean it was nonexistent or even rare.

I think it's already been done...not by me. Don't have the reference handy, but it's been extensively argued in at least lengthy history of homosexual behavior.

489 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:02pm

re: #460 FrogMarch

Two of my three cats would happily, mindlessly, mercilessly, joyfully, viciously rip the bird apart the second it hit the floor.

You do realize that Walter is alerting the special parrot police about you at this very minute right?

490 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:02pm

re: #466 ploome hineni

Rick Warren, Billy Graham,Louis Farrakhan and the rev Wright all have built churches on their own cult of personality

Well I would not put Billy Graham with the other three. At All.

Once in Australia Billy Graham held a revival in a city, and the crime rate there went down significantly, and it stayed down.

Such does not come from a personality.

491 SFGoth  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:06pm

re: #432 jwb7605

re: #460 FrogMarch

Two of my three cats would happily, mindlessly, mercilessly, joyfully, viciously rip the bird apart the second it hit the floor.

My 14# stray tabby, Toonses, is quite afraid of a big, stuffed Siberian tiger I bought at Walgreens. LOL. He'll crouch, move around, stalk it, and then run when I kick it towards him. Other than that, he's a big pussy cat.

492 Dianna  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:22pm

re: #480 Occasional Reader

Okay, see, you just lost me on the whole Judeo-Christianity thing right here.

/

It leaves out Judges 19 and 20, too.

493 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:32pm

re: #453 Salamantis

Hitler is one of those hot potatoes that everybody wants to pass off. Hitler's personal views can be disputed by using cherry picked quotes from various sources. I happen to view Hitler as a nominal Christian, but I'd guess the majority of Nazi party members were Christians (just based on 1930's German demographics). Hitler most likely would have replaced the existing version of Christianity with his own state sponsored version eventually just for control purposes. Hitler's views are debatable but I'm pretty sure that most of the rank and file doing the dirty work were most certainly Christians. The Church did lay the foundation of antisemitism that Hitler exploited.

494 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:39pm
495 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:46pm

re: #458 jwb7605

I "have" two cats.
One cat loves to sit in front of the aquarium and wait for a fish.
One fish ... seriously ... one particular fish ... seems fond of coming to the glass and checking out the cat.
Which, of course, leads to entertaining scenes to watch. (No way can the cat get to the fish)

My wife seems convinced that the fish is intentionally teasing the cat.
I contend that fish aren't smart enough to do that.

Any idea?

I think the fish is intentionally teasing the cat.
OR
The cat and the fish have developed some sort of mutual mind-meld ESP that we will never figure out.

496 neocon hippie  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:41:57pm
497 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:42:11pm

re: #463 buzzsawmonkey

What was prohibited in the Torah was sex of any sort, outside of marriage--with the same sex or the opposite sex. The same-sex prohibitions are much scantier, as it was far less important than ensuring that women were protected--and protection, at that time, was through marriage.

Wasnt Lot an elder of the city? He certainly *sat in the gates* of the city.

498 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:42:42pm

re: #489 doriangrey

You do realize that Walter is alerting the special parrot police about you at this very minute right?

He has already called the patchouli police on me. I can handle it.

(good thing I don't actually own a bird...yet)

499 Noam Sayin'  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:42:54pm

re: #481 MandyManners

Maybe you should. With love in your heart. Nice vibes. Honey instead of vinegar.

The mouse is going down, Mandy.

So far, he's proven to be a worthy adversary.

500 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:43:01pm

re: #482 Kragar (proud to be kafir)

Details here

Doh.... you didnt just Rick roll the innocent among us...... ;p

501 unrealizedviewpoint  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:43:01pm

re: #488 FlakMusic

I think it's already been done...not by me. Don't have the reference handy, but it's been extensively argued in at least lengthy history of homosexual behavior.

One need assume that with greater acceptance its prevalence is heightened.

502 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:43:03pm

re: #490 Ojoe

SORRY but i would only lump wright and farakahan it really isn't fair or logical to put the first two with the latter two.

503 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:43:24pm

Following up on my #459: Homosexuality was common enough in the ancient Jewish world for King Saul to at least imagine that there was a sexual element in the relationship between Jonathan and David, whether or not this was actually the case. (To my understanding, Saul saying to his son Jonathan "thou hast uncovered the nakedness of thy mother" pretty much confirms how Saul perceived things, since the phrase is a general euphemism for sexual immorality.)

504 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:43:32pm

re: #502 yochanan

Yes also.

505 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:43:42pm

re: #491 SFGoth

My 14# stray tabby, Toonses, is quite afraid of a big, stuffed Siberian tiger I bought at Walgreens. LOL. He'll crouch, move around, stalk it, and then run when I kick it towards him. Other than that, he's a big pussy cat.

The cat I was referring to used to try to nurse this huge stuffed teddy bear when he was a kitten.

I thought it was hilarious, my wife thought the cat was a pervert.

506 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:43:59pm

re: #422 Salamantis


Certain pairs of systems, however, are indeed correlative and at the same time distinct. This occurs when two belief systems directly oppose one another; they are then relational as correlative opposites, and mutually contradict in their conclusions as a result of the operation of a single logic upon mutually exclusive premises. Two belief systems bearing this relationship may be viewed as thesis and antithesis and compared dialectically.

Your quote above saying that the Soviet Union (rather, Communism of which the Soviets are just one example) took its governmental structure from the Church. Here, in this quote, you say they are dialectical opposites. I'm not a big fan of Hegel, and less of a fan of Dialectical Materialism.


The Soviet government was built in the image of the Roman Catholic Church, and Lenin became its first Pope.


That is some very subjective reading. The Atheists are just like the Christians?


Things move more quickly these days, for thirty years after the Soviet Republic was born Marshal Tito, the first harbinger of schism, appeared on the scene


You seem to have forgotten Leon Trotsky. And all of those Stalinist purges. Oh, and Mao, and all of his purges. For that matter, Lenin was a pretty bloody ruler himself, just not so bad when compared to Stalin.

507 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:44:27pm

re: #494 buzzsawmonkey

Simple? Yes. Too simple. It owes far too much to modern feminoresentment of the Bible.

I know you are leaving so we shall save this discussion for another time.

508 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:44:42pm

re: #479 unrealizedviewpoint

linky please.

Sorry! Use the SHOP ONLINE button. Honeyville Grain

509 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:44:42pm
510 HoosierHoops  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:44:59pm

Test..ok i know there are a thousand remarks to this..But testing..I have a reason

511 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:45:09pm

re: #507 Haverwilde

feminoresentment

ROFLMAO


BBL

512 buzzsawmonkey[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:45:12pm
513 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:45:40pm

re: #510 HoosierHoops

Test..ok i know there are a thousand remarks to this..But testing..I have a reason

Your coffee pot is broken..... Noooooo the humanities........... ;p

514 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:45:45pm

re: #493 Killgore Trout

Hitler is one of those hot potatoes that everybody wants to pass off. Hitler's personal views can be disputed by using cherry picked quotes from various sources. I happen to view Hitler as a nominal Christian, but I'd guess the majority of Nazi party members were Christians (just based on 1930's German demographics). Hitler most likely would have replaced the existing version of Christianity with his own state sponsored version eventually just for control purposes. Hitler's views are debatable but I'm pretty sure that most of the rank and file doing the dirty work were most certainly Christians. The Church did lay the foundation of antisemitism that Hitler exploited.

But they weren't REAL Christians!
/

515 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:45:48pm

re: #458 jwb7605

Dogs have owners....cats have staff. :)

516 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:45:51pm

re: #499 Noam Sayin'

The mouse is going down, Mandy.

So far, he's proven to be a worthy adversary.

Poor widdle mousie.

517 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:46:19pm

re: #478 Walter L. Newton

I've recounted this here before, but once, I had a girlfriend who Maisey didn't like. We could be sitting on the couch together, watching a movie, and Maisey would climb down her cage (her cage goes to the floor), waddle across the living room rug, and then bite my girlfriend on her toe (open toed-shoes).

When my Dad was courting my Mom, she had a cat, who apparently realized that this Dad character was (by the cat's criteria) up to no good. So when Dad would go to my grandparents' house to pick up Mom for a date, and he was waiting in the living room for her to finish getting ready, the cat would calmly stroll downstairs, walk across the room, walk across his shoes, and keep walking... as if he weren't there.

518 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:46:30pm

re: #437 yochanan

dialectical materialism has more to with Hegel dialectical method than Christian belief

Hegel did indeed lead, through Feuerbach, to Marx, but Christianity, through Aquinas annd Kant, led to Hegel.

the huge number of Church's and shuls the communists destroyed make your joke of blaming Christianity for Marxism a total joke

Just as much of a joke as Christians and Muslims persecuting Jews, when the very existence of their religions depended upon Judaism's prior existence. The same relationship holds between Christianity and Marxism.

if you want to trace Marxism back you should look at the french revolution instead and the Paris commune.

Actually, umm, no. The French Revolution was meant to lead to a constitutional democracy, but fell prey to excess and intrigue, which sidetracked it, via the jacobins and Robespierre, into the Reign of Terror.

but your person dislike for me makes any debate on ANY ISSUE TO BE WORTHLESS

You have richly earned and eminently deserve my lack of respect for you by repeatedly engaging in precisely the kind of bigotrously intolerant anti-secularism you have abundantly demonstrated on this thread.

519 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:46:32pm
520 cherryblossoms  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:46:34pm

Warren just wants his piece of the Obama pie!

521 HoosierHoops  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:46:50pm

re: #513 doriangrey

Your coffee pot is broken..... Noooooo the humanities........... ;p

LOL
Hi Dorian!

522 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:47:13pm

re: #473 FrogMarch

If you were in town, there was a rescue bird that one of my coworkers knew about earlier this fall. It was a Military Macaw. Beautiful, big bird. I'd have loved to have taken it, but I've got enough pets.

523 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:47:26pm

re: #521 HoosierHoops

LOL
Hi Dorian!

Sup hoops....... ;)

524 WriterMom  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:47:29pm

So what did I miss today?

525 NelsFree  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:47:39pm

re: #370 Throbert McGee

I am SO glad that your single post has corrected the beliefs of hundreds of millions of Christians. I am, well, impressed.
/s

526 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:47:42pm

re: #517 Occasional Reader

When my Dad was courting my Mom, she had a cat, who apparently realized that this Dad character was (by the cat's criteria) up to no good. So when Dad would go to my grandparents' house to pick up Mom for a date, and he was waiting in the living room for her to finish getting ready, the cat would calmly stroll downstairs, walk across the room, walk across his shoes, and keep walking... as if he weren't there.

As an aside to your story, is this really a comment from OP? It was so, I don't know, how should i put it, well, ah, so... normal. LOL.

527 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:47:53pm

re: #519 ploome hineni

Bennie Hinn...the forehead slapper...LOL

528 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:48:19pm

re: #487 buzzsawmonkey

Like many American cities today, Sodom had strict gun control. Nobody was able to have a firearm.

Would it have been so hard for the Second Commandment to include a Second Amendment?

529 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:48:22pm

re: #517 Occasional Reader

When my Dad was courting my Mom, she had a cat, who apparently realized that this Dad character was (by the cat's criteria) up to no good. So when Dad would go to my grandparents' house to pick up Mom for a date, and he was waiting in the living room for her to finish getting ready, the cat would calmly stroll downstairs, walk across the room, walk across his shoes, and keep walking... as if he weren't there.

Or, maybe the cat was claiming your dad as his.

530 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:48:30pm

re: #519 ploome hineni

those are the few name I rememberd, there must be dozen more

that Beny something with the horrible hair

lol

they spend alot of money on hair...have you so little regard?...remember the Bakers!...

531 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:48:36pm

re: #515 fclass308

Dogs have owners....cats have staff. :)

and my avatar agrees.
and, that same (perverted?) cat also loves to sit in front of the dog door and bop the sheepdog on the nose (claws retracted) when the dog tries to come in the door.

532 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:48:51pm

re: #523 doriangrey

Sup hoops....... ;)

Hi Dorian.

533 legalpad  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:49:20pm

re: #453 Salamantis

I don't know how much credence to give the first part of that article, since the last part of it repeats the blatant lie that Hitler was inspired by Darwin - a charge that has been conclusively refuted here on LGF on the EVO threads. Neither Dawin nor evolution are mentioned in Mein Kampf, and the Third Reich ordered Darwins books burned.

Right -

If Nazism represented the culmination of anything, it was that of the nineteenth-century and early-twentieth century ideology of social Darwinism. Read historian Richard Weikart's revealing study, From Darwin to Hitler. As Weikart documents, both Hitler and Himmler were admirers of Darwin and often spoke of their role as enacting a "law of nature" that guaranteed the "elimination of the unfit." Weikart argues that Hitler himself "drew upon a bountiful fund of social Darwinist thought to construct his own racist philosophy" and concludes that while Darwinism is not a "sufficient" intellectual explanation for Nazism, it is a "necessary" one. Without Darwinism, quite possibly there would not have been Nazism.

The Nazis also drew on the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, adapting his atheist philosophy to their crude purposes. Nietzsche's vision of the ubermensch and his elevation of a new ethic "beyond good and evil" were avidly embraced by Nazi propagandists. Nietzsche's "will to power" almost became a Nazi recruitment slogan. I am not for a moment suggesting that Darwin or Nietzsche would have approved of Hitler's ideas. But Hitler and his henchmen approved of Darwin's and Nietzsche's ideas. Harris simply ignores the evidence of the Nazis' sympathies for Darwin, Nietzsche, and atheism. So what sense can we make of his claim that the leading Nazis were "knowingly or unknowingly" agents of religion? Clearly, it is nonsense.

I think this was a relatively conservative use of the Darwin link argument. I think their point was that the Nazis were comfortable with the anti-religious version of Darwinism and therefore were not culturally a "religious" force.

I also think that a "discredit the part - discredit the whole" with this article is ineffective because Hitlers negative comments about Christianity have been widely known for some time. This article is not the source of these comments.

btw - I am not a Christian, but I believe that the idea that Hitler was, is just part of the silly "your ideology is the source of all the world's problems and mine isn't" debate. He may have used it politically, but he clearly had contempt for anything remotely resembling conventional Christianity.

534 unrealizedviewpoint  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:49:38pm

re: #515 fclass308

Dogs have owners....cats have staff. :)

cats have slaves

535 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:50:12pm

re: #456 Thanos

I guess my post could have been a little more clear. That is what I get for trying to keep up with the pace car.

You are totally correct. Religion is a major segue for the cult of personality. Koresh, Jones, the list goes on and on.

I guess my emphasis was looking at these instances of the cult of personality.

Not to diminish those given the religious example, it seems to me within the secular arena, the amplification has been greater. Your mention of Mussolini, in my mind would dictate his ambition was never religious to begin with, but rather a tool of the trade.

The cult of personality, acquiesced, lead to the 2nd world war. It perpetrated the Holocaust. It corralled millions into boxcars heading into the frozen wasteland of labor camps for the greater good, and corrective outlook. In our time, truthfully, I am rationalizing in numbers of human beings here, folks like Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, etc have devoured tens of millions of human beings purely born out of delusion of societal grandeur.

Please don't take my writing as provocation, it was/is not. You know I respect you, and many others here who fit the mold of a secular mindset.

536 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:50:16pm

re: #532 Walter L. Newton

Hi Dorian.

Arent you suppose to be entertaining the great washed masses or something...... ;p

537 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:50:27pm

re: #509 buzzsawmonkey

Everybody sat at the gates of the city in those days; that was where business was transacted. But recall that in the account, when Lot protests against the mob, they say, in effect, "See? this guy comes in here, a stranger, and we let him stay, and he is trying to act better than we are!"

In ancient times being a "sojourner"--as Lot was, as Abraham was when he requests permission to buy a burial plot and pays an exhorbitant price for it--was to be in a tenuous position at best, on sufferance.

Hmm seems to me that it was typical for the elders to *sit in the gates* of the city. For various infractions in Torah, the *defendent* was to be brought there for judgment to be made.
Yes, I believe that though Lot had been accepted as an elder, the crowd turned on him when he denied them the strangers. The same thing can be seen throughout the ages, where a righteous man is accepted until....

538 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:50:54pm
539 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:51:15pm

re: #491 SFGoth

My 14# stray tabby, Toonses, is quite afraid of a big, stuffed Siberian tiger I bought at Walgreens. LOL. He'll crouch, move around, stalk it, and then run when I kick it towards him. Other than that, he's a big pussy cat.

One of my female cats has an actual police rap sheet. (no - I'm not kidding)
long story involving blood, dead baby bunnies, an angry neighbor, my own hand, a trip to the ER, an I.V. filled with mega-antibiotics, the Louisville Police, the Boulder police, and a hefty medical bill.

540 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:51:26pm

to blame the church for communism is disingenuous at best.

541 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:51:41pm

re: #528 Occasional Reader

re: #531 jwb7605

I'd give a dollar, cash American, to see that. Cats are such characters sometimes...

542 Occasional Reader  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:52:24pm

re: #526 Walter L. Newton

As an aside to your story, is this really a comment from OP? It was so, I don't know, how should i put it, well, ah, so... normal. LOL.

Does "OP" refer to your humble author?

I'm quite normal, thanks very much. I'm one of the more normal people I know.

543 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:52:26pm

re: #539 FrogMarch

One of my female cats has an actual police rap sheet. (no - I'm not kidding)
long story involving blood, dead baby bunnies, an angry neighbor, my own hand, a trip to the ER, an I.V. filled with mega-antibiotics, the Louisville Police, the Boulder police, and a hefty medical bill.

Hmmm, should I file a restraining order on your cat?

544 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:52:29pm

re: #514 Walter L. Newton

But they weren't REAL Christians!
/

There was a small handful of *real* christians in Germany. They tried to take Hitler out, and died for their trouble.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was one.

545 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:52:32pm

re: #531 jwb7605

and my avatar agrees.
and, that same (perverted?) cat also loves to sit in front of the dog door and bop the sheepdog on the nose (claws retracted) when the dog tries to come in the door.

Not perverted, just doing cat "stuff".

One of our cats is similarly "grouchy" with the other animals and also we humans, and has earned herself the moniker "Psycho Cat". It truly fits.

546 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:03pm

re: #542 Occasional Reader

Does "OP" refer to your humble author?

I'm quite normal, thanks very much. I'm one of the more normal people I know.

Original poster...... ;p

547 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:05pm

re: #539 FrogMarch

One of my female cats has an actual police rap sheet. (no - I'm not kidding)
long story involving blood, dead baby bunnies, an angry neighbor, my own hand, a trip to the ER, an I.V. filled with mega-antibiotics, the Louisville Police, the Boulder police, and a hefty medical bill.

You live in Louisville?

548 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:09pm

re: #514 Walter L. Newton

I did skip past someone upthread claiming that Stalin and Mao weren't secular atheists. Everybody loves a true Scotsman.

549 ArmyWife  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:12pm

Evening all!

I expected much more heat in this thread. I am pleasantly surprised.

Whether I agree with Rev. Rick's stance on any of this, I find it pathetic he would bend to The One. If The One is capable of doing this to the likes of a Rev. Rick we can only imagine how PC and sanitized our information from this administration is going to be. Egads.

550 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:14pm
551 unrealizedviewpoint  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:17pm

re: #508 Wishing

Sorry! Use the SHOP ONLINE button. Honeyville Grain

thanks!

552 notutopia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:48pm

re: #478 Walter L. Newton
LOL and Ooouch !
And you wonder why your girlfriends wear steel toed boots...
: )

553 Noam Sayin'  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:53:49pm

re: #516 MandyManners

Shall I catch him in a live trap and send him to your house?


Diseases Carried by House Mice

At this point, I don't think the little bugger would fall for a live trap. I was thoroughly impressed with him pushing the snap-trap out of his way. This is no ordinary mouse. He's seriously making me look like Sylvester about now.

554 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:54:12pm

Ca...the other white meat. :)

555 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:54:22pm

re: #551 unrealizedviewpoint

thanks!

Are you stocking up?

556 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:54:27pm

re: #535 formercorpsman

I suspect that if the means and opportunity had existed during the reign of tyrants and emperors empowered by the divine right of kings that they would have abused humanity just as badly. It took population density, technology, and means of mass communication and propaganda to kill the millions they did.

557 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:54:28pm

re: #544 Wishing

There was a small handful of *real* christians in Germany. They tried to take Hitler out, and died for their trouble.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was one.

I would humbly suggest that you drop this line of reasoning, dont ask any questions dont defend anything you might be thinking, just drop it.

558 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:54:34pm

re: #542 Occasional Reader

I'm the only normal person I know. You have to watch out for all the others.

Some of them are crazy...

559 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:54:53pm

re: #554 fclass308

Cat, the other white meat....verse 2. :)

560 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:54:55pm

re: #525 NelsFree

I am SO glad that your single post has corrected the beliefs of hundreds of millions of Christians. I am, well, impressed.
/s

I was just going to let it go and not mention that from the time of the Apostles, Christians actually talked to each other about such things and wrote letters and books, many which we still have—some are recently found, after being lost for centuries.

561 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:55:03pm

re: #536 doriangrey

Arent you suppose to be entertaining the great washed masses or something...... ;p

No, Christmas show closed yesterday. Our next show opens Jan 7th, regional premiere of Conner McPherson's newest play "Shining City."

We have a "bawdy" gay New Years Eve show, a rental, just that night, and then on Jan 3rd, we have a folk concert, local artist.

We have a three week crossover this time. The O. Henry set came down after the show yesterday and two hours later, most of Shining City set was in place, only have to do the detail work on it.

562 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:55:13pm

cats are cats, they relate to humans by choice i think, with dogs the connections seem deeper.

563 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:55:15pm

re: #550 ploome hineni

I just was thinking about Tammy's eyelashes

/essentially a sweet soul.......may she rip

She was indeed essentially sweet and sincere, I think.
But first hubby Jim was a basket case . . .

564 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:55:19pm

re: #540 yochanan

And to blame atheists or darwin for it is just as bad.

565 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:55:23pm

re: #557 doriangrey

I would humbly suggest that you drop this line of reasoning, dont ask any questions dont defend anything you might be thinking, just drop it.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

566 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:55:42pm

re: #522 Iron Fist

If you were in town, there was a rescue bird that one of my coworkers knew about earlier this fall. It was a Military Macaw. Beautiful, big bird. I'd have loved to have taken it, but I've got enough pets.

Aw. What town?
That's alwasy the big problem for us soft-hearts. Just one more pet.
And why do I feel like rescuing stuff from the pet store?

567 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:55:55pm

re: #545 reine.de.tout

Not perverted, just doing cat "stuff".

One of our cats is similarly "grouchy" with the other animals and also we humans, and has earned herself the moniker "Psycho Cat". It truly fits.

This cat isn't grouchy. It's a big game. Adores kids and babies.
The cat knows better than to get near the dog food dish.
Other than that, the cat cuddles, and all sorts of cute things.

568 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:56:04pm

re: #543 doriangrey

Hmmm, should I file a restraining order on your cat?

You wouldn't be the first person to do it.

569 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:56:17pm

re: #550 ploome hineni

I just was thinking about Tammy's eyelashes

/essentially a sweet soul.......may she rip

570 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:56:27pm

Jackie and Dunlap of Red State Update weigh in on Rick Warren and gays.

I have feelings for Dunlap... it must be the sideburns.

571 HoosierHoops  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:56:45pm

re: #536 doriangrey

Arent you suppose to be entertaining the great washed masses or something...... ;p

Hi Dorian! I wrote Larry Bird an email earlier tonight.. As the president of the Indiana Pacers I thought he could promote one pre season game next year and call it Hoops for Troops.. And give the proceeds to our Military.. And face it..We in Indiana love our troops...I think it would be a great thing for Indiana.
Waiting for response...
How are you tonight?

572 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:56:53pm

re: #565 Wishing

I have no idea what you are talking about.

What ever. I have offered you my best advice, earned at a very heavy price, take it or ignore it.

573 Noam Sayin'  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:57:38pm

re: #553 Noam Sayin'

He's seriously making me look like Sylvester about now.

Wish I'd found this one, first.

574 formercorpsman  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:57:45pm

re: #556 Thanos

Fair enough.

Daughter is yelling at me now, bbialw.

575 reine.de.tout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:58:16pm

re: #567 jwb7605

This cat isn't grouchy. It's a big game. Adores kids and babies.
The cat knows better than to get near the dog food dish.
Other than that, the cat cuddles, and all sorts of cute things.

I have 4 cats and a dog.
I love 'em all, but the cats, frankly, are much easier to take care of.
And in their own way, very affectionate and they do show their affection.
And like your cat, they all know to stay the heck away from the dog food dish LOL.

576 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:58:20pm

re: #488 FlakMusic
I have trouble believing research today that proves one in five, or ten, or twenty men are homosexual. If you are Barney Frank you want people to believe homosexuality is common; if you are Jerry Falwell, it is depraved but rare. But beyond that, if you ask men if they are gay, or faithful to their wife, how do you know your survey results are accurate?

Documenting human behavior 3000 years ago is subject to the same bias from the researcher, with much less available data.

577 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:58:20pm

re: #547 jwb7605

You live in Louisville?

No. But that Urgent Care Center on South Boulder rd., in Louisville, is open late.
You live in Louisville, though - right?

578 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:58:21pm

re: #561 Walter L. Newton

No, Christmas show closed yesterday. Our next show opens Jan 7th, regional premiere of Conner McPherson's newest play "Shining City."

We have a "bawdy" gay New Years Eve show, a rental, just that night, and then on Jan 3rd, we have a folk concert, local artist.

We have a three week crossover this time. The O. Henry set came down after the show yesterday and two hours later, most of Shining City set was in place, only have to do the detail work on it.

Man, what a bunch of liberal arts slackers.... ;p

579 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:58:22pm

re: #566 FrogMarch

Knoxville, Tenneesee. This bird's owner is doing a term of service in the State penal institution. From what has been said, he's going to be gone a long time.

580 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:58:23pm

re: #572 doriangrey

What ever. I have offered you my best advice, earned at a very heavy price, take it or ignore it.

If that is your advice, you may want to take it a step further and clue me in with the clue bat as to your topic.

581 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:58:52pm

re: #569 albusteve

I tried to say I meant no harm...she just wanted the dough without all the subterfuge...who wouldnt?....'I AM TAMMY'....

582 Alouette  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:59:15pm

re: #544 Wishing

There was a small handful of *real* christians in Germany. They tried to take Hitler out, and died for their trouble.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was one.

The White Rose

583 unrealizedviewpoint  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 6:59:45pm

re: #555 Wishing

Are you stocking up?

Have been since 911. Always buying foods I can't stand. This way I don't get lazy, stop shopping, and eat it. It'll be there when I'm really hungry and need it. Hopefully I'll never need eat it.

584 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:00:37pm

re: #553 Noam Sayin'

Shall I catch him in a live trap and send him to your house?


Diseases Carried by House Mice

At this point, I don't think the little bugger would fall for a live trap. I was thoroughly impressed with him pushing the snap-trap out of his way. This is no ordinary mouse. He's seriously making me look like Sylvester about now.

How are you gonna' catch him?

585 ploome hineni[deleted]  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:00:46pm
586 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:00:57pm

re: #506 Iron Fist

You seem to have forgotten Leon Trotsky. And all of those Stalinist purges. Oh, and Mao, and all of his purges. For that matter, Lenin was a pretty bloody ruler himself, just not so bad when compared to Stalin.

I wasn't addressing genocides, but the evolution of systems of ideas. However, if I were to do so, let's grant that communism and fascism have been responsible for a hundred million murders. All that would have to happen for religionns to equal this number would be for fifty thousand people to have been killed due to some religion or other each year for the past two thousand. Who can doubt that this would be an exceedingly conservative estimate?

587 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:01:24pm

re: #575 reine.de.tout

Birds, cats and dogs, is this what this thread degenerating to.
Oh well, here is my 2 cents worth.
My 110 lb. Lab rules the neighborhood as far as real dogs are concerned. But every time he runs after a cat, the cat just turns around and stares him into a dead stop. He then treats them like a good buddy smelling all the juicy parts and runs back to me. Weird dog, weirder cats—cats always ran from dogs when I was a kid.

588 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:02:27pm

re: #573 Noam Sayin'

Wish I'd found this one, first.

Andale! Andale!

589 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:02:31pm

re: #580 Wishing

If that is your advice, you may want to take it a step further and clue me in with the clue bat as to your topic.

There are some very fine Lizards here who suffered profoundly at the hand of Nazi's. This subject causes them much personal grief. Only a fool (like myself) stirs up those feeling by discussing this subject. Please show more compassion than I did and just let it go.

590 Naso Tang  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:02:43pm

re: #377 yochanan

not nice madoff doesn't have anything to do with it one way or the other

He is clearly another sociopathic criminal. Wasn't it your contention that it is the lack of religion that causes such behavior?

591 FlakMusic  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:02:52pm

buzzsawmonkey:

What was prohibited in the Torah was sex of any sort, outside of marriage--with the same sex or the opposite sex. The same-sex prohibitions are much scantier, as it was far less important than ensuring that women were protected--and protection, at that time, was through marriage.

In the prohibitions of same sex sex in the Torah, there's no qualification. It's a blanket condemnation.

As to the story of Sodom, the Talmud regards the sin of Sodom to be a pathological inhospitality to strangers--not buttsex. The hostility of the men of Sodom to the angelic messengers directly follows--and is intended to contrast with--the open hospitality which they are shown by Abraham. The famous threatened gang-rape is just that--a gang-rape, which, like a prison rape, is less about same-sex desire than a means of humiliation and dominance.

Well, I'm not in a position to dispute this with you at the moment, as I don't have access to my library, and my memory isn't what it once was.

I think there's a long history of Jewish interpretation that condemns Sodom for its pervasive same sex sex behaviors (there's something deeply troubling about ALL males in city coming to pound on Lot's door) (as well as the fact that it's undeniably poor hospitality...gang raping one's visitors is very bad form indeed).

I also think that in addition to the explicit prohibitions of same sex sex, Jewish tradition builds an elaborate theology based on the positive affirmations in Genesis 2:24 that precludes same sex sex.

But, I'll defer to you for now, because I'm not in a position do otherwise at the moment.

592 ArmyWife  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:03:02pm

I have 3 dogs and a cat (and 3 horses). The cat has NO issues eating out of the German Shepherd's bowl. In fact, I will have to remove her face from the bowl so the 80 pound dog can eat. The dog will sit there and just watch. I know in her dog brain she is thinking "Damn cat, I could take her out, but that would make me a bad dog, and I am NOT a bad dog".

She is not as found of the Chihuahuas. They really want to be her friend. She walks by them and wacks them for good measure, whether they are annoying her or not.

Mr. ArmyWife won't let the horses inside, though they have very distinct personalities.

593 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:03:15pm

Sorry- my fault for diverting the conversation to birds cats and dogs.
I must say though - I learned tons. Thanks. Now time for bed. Good night lizards.

594 ArmyWife  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:03:24pm

re: #584 MandyManners

He is gonna build a better mousetrap!

595 ArmyWife  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:03:40pm

Night FrogMarch!

596 solomonpanting  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:03:45pm

re: #518 Salamantis

"bigotrously" ?

Is that a word?

597 CapeCoddah  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:04:00pm

re: #499 Noam Sayin'

Hey Noam, if you have a mouse, you have at least 6, there is no such thing as one mouse... Try the old fashioned mousetraps with peanut butter smeared on the food hook. Works for me every time.

599 Noam Sayin'  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:04:27pm

re: #584 MandyManners

How are you gonna' catch him?

I'd rather not say. I'm not entirely sure he's not hacking my computer when i'm not around.

600 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:04:38pm

re: #587 Haverwilde

It may be his "tone of voice" when he is barking and chasing the cats.

They probably understand he is just living up to the stereotype and his canine obligation to his owner...."See Dad...I chase cats just like I'm supposed to". LOL

601 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:04:53pm

re: #596 solomonpanting

"bigotrously" ?

Is that a word?

If a revered scientist like Sal says it is it must be..... ;p lol...lol...lol...

602 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:04:54pm

re: #579 Iron Fist

Knoxville, Tenneesee. This bird's owner is doing a term of service in the State penal institution. From what has been said, he's going to be gone a long time.

I hope the bird finds a good home. Keep an eye out.

603 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:05:17pm

re: #577 FrogMarch

No. But that Urgent Care Center on South Boulder rd., in Louisville, is open late.
You live in Louisville, though - right?

Yup.
A friend of a friend (here in Louisville) lost three rabbits to wascally cats. At least that's what the guy thought -- no "actual proof"
That's why I asked.
I suggested a sturdier cage might be the answer. Cats, raccoons, foxes, coyotes -- the Boulder County "open space" program is pretty wildlife friendly, but a lot of people are dumb enough to believe the wildlife is "harmless".
Had a family of skunks try to move in under my front porch three years ago.
A rabid prairie dog two years ago.

Could be worse -- if you're in Boulder, you even get to worry about the stray mountain lion! Deer are usually out and about just west of North Boulder Park (by the hospital)

604 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:05:17pm

re: #583 unrealizedviewpoint

Have been since 911. Always buying foods I can't stand. This way I don't get lazy, stop shopping, and eat it. It'll be there when I'm really hungry and need it. Hopefully I'll never need eat it.

geez what a reminder...they say if I-40 westbound into Albuquerque shuts down we will all become cannibles...therefore I stock up heavily on soy sauce, PickaPepper and lots of horseraddish mustard type stuff...I'm ready for the fall amigo...

605 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:05:34pm

re: #596 solomonpanting

"bigotrously" ?

Is that a word?

Of course its a work, you saw it here didn't you!

606 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:05:35pm

re: #583 unrealizedviewpoint

Have been since 911. Always buying foods I can't stand. This way I don't get lazy, stop shopping, and eat it. It'll be there when I'm really hungry and need it. Hopefully I'll never need eat it.

Good job! I figure the kids may come home if the economy really tanks, and by then it may cost a LOT to eat. So we have been stocking up for about a year now. Not much, just buy a bit extra when we can.

607 Noam Sayin'  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:06:07pm

re: #597 CapeCoddah

He moves the traps, after licking off the peanut butter.

608 Wishing  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:06:18pm

re: #582 Alouette

The White Rose

Thanks for that link!

609 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:06:44pm

re: #598 Killgore Trout

Sara, 13-yrs girl, plays RUSH - YYZ with stick performance

And with style (and holding her drumstick correctly, at least the classical hold).

610 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:07:23pm

re: #542 Occasional Reader

Does "OP" refer to your humble author?

I'm quite normal, thanks very much. I'm one of the more normal people I know.


But you live in Washington DC so the population sample is more than a little skewed.

611 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:07:28pm

re: #604 albusteve


ROFLMAO.... :)

612 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:07:34pm

Wait a minute, Dr. Laura just came on, have to change the station. BBIAB.

613 legalpad  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:07:59pm

re: #580 Wishing

This might involve the idea of who is, and is not, a "real" Christian.

614 David IV of Georgia  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:08:09pm

re: #598 Killgore Trout

Sara, 13-yrs girl, plays RUSH - YYZ with stick performance

How Neal Peart of her...

/not much better compliment than that.

615 CapeCoddah  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:08:27pm

re: #607 Noam Sayin'

Use a couple of small finishing nails to hold the trap. try just filling that center hole with PB, no extra so he has to work harder to get it.

616 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:08:31pm

re: #609 Walter L. Newton

Too bad she's playing over that crappy karaoke tape. Still, pretty damn impressive.

617 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:09:29pm

re: #616 Killgore Trout

Too bad she's playing over that crappy karaoke tape. Still, pretty damn impressive.

Yea, I was wondering what that track was. It was stinky.

618 Iron Fist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:10:01pm

re: #586 Salamantis

Um, you are the one who said that Tito was"...the first harbinger of schism..." That is simply untrue. And you know it is untrue.


All that would have to happen for religionns to equal this number would be for fifty thousand people to have been killed due to some religion or other each year for the past two thousand. Who can doubt that this would be an exceedingly conservative estimate?

You've gone from discussing how you believe that the structure of the USSR was based on that of Catholicism, to alleging that if you add up all the people killed by all the religions in all the world for the last two thousand years manages to overtop the dead at the hands of fascism and communism for, what, fifty years. Are you missing a sarc tag, or are you that messed up?
619 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:10:08pm

re: #613 legalpad

This might involve the idea of who is, and is not, a "real" Christian.

Wow, that could become and endless thread. My early Baptist learnin' suggests there ain't many in this world at all. Now my Unitarian sister, well there are whole lot of them.

620 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:10:31pm

re: #616 Killgore Trout

Too bad she's playing over that crappy karaoke tape. Still, pretty damn impressive.

dr laura?...wtf is that?...go mix drinks and dream up excuses for me....dr laura?...hahahaha!

621 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:11:49pm

re: #620 albusteve

so why dont 'we' like dr laura?...I hate being left out...

622 jwb7605  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:12:56pm

Just went next door and checked out Jackie & Dunlap.
hint: watch the ENTIRE video. All the way to the end.

Outta here!

623 Killgore Trout  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:13:13pm

re: #617 Walter L. Newton

I listened to it again and it does seem like she's rushing the beat a little bit but I think it's just that she playing over that MIDI file. Her timing is probably pretty damn good.

624 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:13:30pm

re: #620 albusteve

You ever tried to visualize her....well....in a nasty black teddie, saying "come here , big boy" ?

/full body shiver....

625 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:14:31pm

re: #624 fclass308

You ever tried to visualize her....well....in a nasty black teddie, saying "come here , big boy" ?

/full body shiver....

Putting that image in my head was just plain evil......

626 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:15:07pm

re: #625 doriangrey

Putting that image in my head was just plain evil......

Who?

627 rawmuse  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:15:14pm

re: #598 Killgore Trout

Sara, 13-yrs girl, plays RUSH - YYZ with stick performance

Cool, she is playing with a midi track or something?
The only Rush I know is El Rushbo.

628 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:15:15pm

re: #624 fclass308

OOOPS! Wrong Dr.

I was thinking of Dr. Ruth. LOL

629 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:15:55pm

re: #626 Walter L. Newton

Who?

Dr. Laura..... in a nasty black teddie, saying "come here , big boy" ..... YIKES.....

630 FrogMarch  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:16:04pm

re: #603 jwb7605

Yup.
A friend of a friend (here in Louisville) lost three rabbits to wascally cats. At least that's what the guy thought -- no "actual proof"
That's why I asked.

Years ago, my cat, (who is an other-worldly creature- she is beautiful and atthe same time vicious and she looks like a space alien) found some wild baby bunnies who were living in a neighbors back yard - and of course she ate them. I figure one of these days she too will get her turn on the wild food chain. It's a wonder she's still alive. Cat people love my cat, but non-cat people really hate her because she kills things. Most of my neighbors love her becasue she is an excellent mouser.

Anyway - It's been a long day and I'm getting weary. Off I go...
g'night.

631 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:17:31pm

re: #624 fclass308

You ever tried to visualize her....well....in a nasty black teddie, saying "come here , big boy" ?

/full body shiver....

no I have no clue..I mean I trust KT so if I should see dr laura on television I wanna be a hip guy!...you know?

632 big steve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:17:52pm

Several have questioned the up-thread comments about Hitler being a Christian...so I have done a little research and what better than the man's own words...."Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord." -Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

"As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people." - Adolf Hitler - speech - 1922

633 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:18:18pm

re: #533 legalpad

I think this was a relatively conservative use of the Darwin link argument. I think their point was that the Nazis were comfortable with the anti-religious version of Darwinism and therefore were not culturally a "religious" force.

There WAS NO Nazi-Darwin link. What is falsely called 'social darwinism', that is, eugenics, is inherently opposed to evolutionary theory. Evolutionary theory would maintain that the process of environmental selection should proceed unhindered, while eugenicists all wanna impose their pet 'intelligent' design. What Nazism actually followed was animal husbandry, including selective breeding and herd-culling, applied to humans, an idea first proposed by Plato in The Republic.

I also think that a "discredit the part - discredit the whole" with this article is ineffective because Hitlers negative comments about Christianity have been widely known for some time. This article is not the source of these comments.

His positive comments concerning Christianity are well-known, too; here are two of many:

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow my self to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice… And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows . For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people." –Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

"Around 1937, when Hitler heard that at the instigation of the party and the SS vast numbers of his followers had left the church because it was obstinately opposing his plans, he nevertheless ordered his chief associates, above all Goering and Gobbels, to remain members of the church. He too would remain a member of the Catholic Church, he said, although he had no real attachment to it. And in fact he remained in the church until his suicide." (Inside the Third Reich by Albert Speer page 95-96)

btw - I am not a Christian, but I believe that the idea that Hitler was, is just part of the silly "your ideology is the source of all the world's problems and mine isn't" debate. He may have used it politically, but he clearly had contempt for anything remotely resembling conventional Christianity.

Hitler was not above using what worked. And what worked with a devoutly and piously Christian people was to nod, wink and smile in Christianity's direction, while reifying in action the dark hatred for Jews that was harbored in many a Christian heart at the time. Scapegoating unfortunately works to rally common haters of the selfsame target behind the one doing the scapegoating.

634 Wilderstad  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:18:20pm

re: #458 jwb7605


635 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:18:48pm

re: #629 doriangrey

Dr. Laura..... in a nasty black teddie, saying "come here , big boy" ..... YIKES.....

You mean like this...

NSFW

[Link: www.francesfarmersrevenge.com...]

636 fclass308  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:19:45pm

re: #631 albusteve

Yeah...but I screwed up and was actually thinking about Dr. Ruth the sex doctor. :)

Time for me to hit the hay.

Later, Lizards.

637 legalpad  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:20:05pm

re: #632 big steve

what better than the man's own words

Hitler? What's better than Hitler's words? You're kidding, right?

638 MandyManners  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:20:11pm

re: #599 Noam Sayin'

I'd rather not say. I'm not entirely sure he's not hacking my computer when i'm not around.

He's keeping company with its mouse.

639 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:20:18pm

re: #635 Walter L. Newton

You mean like this...

NSFW

[Link: www.francesfarmersrevenge.com...]

what?...are you embarassed?..who's dr laura?...some TV hero of your's?

640 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:21:21pm

good nite most. this is one thread i regret wasting my time on.

641 doriangrey  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:21:30pm

re: #635 Walter L. Newton

You mean like this...

NSFW

[Link: www.francesfarmersrevenge.com...]

Hmmm... Can you believe that I am now at a complete loss for words?

642 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:22:17pm

re: #635 Walter L. Newton

Dr. Laura's not blonde!?

643 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:22:35pm

re: #544 Wishing

There was a small handful of *real* christians in Germany. They tried to take Hitler out, and died for their trouble.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was one.

Dietrich Bonhoffer initially embraced Hitler; his disillusion with him came late in the life of the Reich. The same thing is true of Martin Niemoller.

644 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:23:17pm

re: #635 Walter L. Newton

Wow, The things you learn (and see) on LGF. Now I really can visualize her in all kinds of ways.

645 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:24:25pm

re: #635 Walter L. Newton

this is a case of e-slander

646 yochanan  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:25:54pm

this isn't the kind of values i can support i will have to rethink a few things i guess.

647 albusteve  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:27:49pm

I happily submit I have no idea who Dr Laura is...if some does maybe they should get out in the real world more often...what am I missing?...is she significant in a television kind of way?...what does she do?...what is her value to y'all?...

648 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:29:34pm

re: #596 solomonpanting

"bigotrously" ?

Is that a word?

It may be a Salogism, like insinuendo, but it's meaning is univocal and clear.

649 Thanos  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:32:12pm

re: #648 Salamantis

Is there no end to the madness, next shall we see such insane neologisms as "Bigotrocity" "Bigotrocious" "Bigotlicious?"

///

650 legalpad  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:34:01pm

re: #633 Salamantis

There WAS NO Nazi-Darwin link

Yes, fine - but there was/is a "Darwin link argument", whichis is what I said. You cannot deny that people have made their own custom designed philosophies using their perception of ideas that Darwin introduced. One can refer to how something is "falsely called" social Darwinism. One can also refer to falsely called "Christianity".

Hitler was not above using what worked

It's seems like we agree regarding Hitler's contempt for conventional Christianity. It would seem that people of murderous intent use anything they can think of to advance their predetermined goals. I do not think that the basic concepts involved in actual Christianity or the ideas involved with evolution, particularly Darwin's approach, led to Hitler, Nazism, or mass-murder.

651 beermeister  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:34:37pm

re: 633 Salamantis

There WAS NO Nazi-Darwin link. What is falsely called 'social darwinism', that is, eugenics, is inherently opposed to evolutionary theory.

I believe there was a Nazi-Haeckel link and a Nazi-Nietzsche link.

652 Dustyvet  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:38:37pm

re: #126 revobob

I'll do vat I can, but these pun sessions take on a life of their- sometimes even an afterlife!

I asked a German friend, "Which Hindu god is the second member of the Hindu triad?" He shrugged his shoulders and said, "Vish I knew."

653 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:40:19pm

re: #644 Haverwilde

As I think more about Walter's link, she truly was a beautiful young woman. The use of 'slut' in the description really irritates me. Okay, I was a bit of a voyeur, but she deserves better than that vile description, of course, all women do.

654 The_Vig  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:41:10pm

Why wouldn't Obama use the pastor from his own church for this invocation......................Oh yeah......I forgot.

655 Dustyvet  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:41:44pm

According to Biblical accounts, Delilah cut Samsonite's hair, whereupon he lost all his luggage.

656 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:43:36pm

re: #618 Iron Fist

Um, you are the one who said that Tito was"...the first harbinger of schism..." That is simply untrue. And you know it is untrue.

It was Marshall Tito who first plotted an independent course for a former Soviet vassal state. He remained Communist, but did not unfilingly toe the Moscow line. This was akin to Martin Luther remaining Christian, but not Catholic. Bolshevik-Menshevik Trotskyite quarrels and in-house intrigues (like different folks sometimes simultaneously claiming to be pope) are not the same thing.

You've gone from discussing how you believe that the structure of the USSR was based on that of Catholicism, to alleging that if you add up all the people killed by all the religions in all the world for the last two thousand years manages to overtop the dead at the hands of fascism and communism for, what, fifty years. Are you missing a sarc tag, or are you that messed up?

Neither. I'm countering a pernicious falsehood that has been propounded here; one used to slander all who do not embrace some patriarchal monotheism or other (either Jewish or Christian - adherence to Islam is quite understandably not being encouraged here, for good and ample reasons). That falsehood is the contention that secular regimes have killed more people than have religious ones. While true over the past 70 years, such a contention is demonstrably false to the point of laughability if the entirety of recorded history is taken into account.

657 Dustyvet  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:45:19pm

re: #652 Dustyvet

I asked a German friend, "Which Hindu god is the second member of the Hindu triad?" He shrugged his shoulders and said, "Vish I knew."

"Most papal I know think that I'm crazy"

658 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:45:48pm

re: #591 FlakMusic

In the prohibitions of same sex sex in the Torah, there's no qualification. It's a blanket condemnation.

Um, the phrase "as with a woman" IS very much a qualifier to the prohibition "a man shall not lie with a man," in Leviticus 18:22

Note that the prohibition against "lying down with" animals (Lev. 18:23) does not add "as you would with a woman," and the many prohibitions against specific forms of incest -- "thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father's brother's wife," etc. -- do not say "as thy would uncover the nakedness of thy spouse."

In other words, the expressions "to lie with" and "to uncover the nakedness of" have a clearly sexual meaning ALL BY THEMSELVES, so the addition of "as with a woman" cannot be for the simple purpose of emphasizing that "a man shall not lie with a man" is not intended as a literal ban on two guys sharing a blanket. Thus, "as with a woman" is a qualifier, one that narrows the scope of the prohibition.

Narrows it how? Well, the Talmud is straightforward: the Levitical prohibition means that a man shall not penetrate a man anally, in imitation of heterosexual intercourse -- for two guys to do the Hershey Highway thing is such a revolting thing that both of them deserve to die. (Hence, there's no catcher/pitcher distinction).

Which is NOT to say that the Talmud therefore gives a green light to all other forms of homosexual activity apart from anal sex -- on the contrary, the Talmud does ban other homosexual acts, at least for Jews, but the bans do not rely on Leviticus 18:22 as their foundation. Because, again, the ancient Jewish scholars thought it sufficiently clear that "a man shall not lie with a man as with a woman" was a narrow prohibition on buttseckx. So bans on other types of homosexual shenanigans had to draw on other passages in the Torah -- and I think that generally the Talmud used the argument that "you shouldn't do non-anal homo stuff because it would be too much like what the pagans do."

Another potential argument against non-anal homo acts, at least in the case of male/male homosexuality, could be a temptation to doin' it in the butt. (Cf. the Catholic warnings against "near occasions of sin.") But as far as I know, the Talmud doesn't actually rely much (or maybe at all) on "it might lead to fudgepacking" -- instead, the case against non-anal sex between men, and against lesbian partying in general, was mainly based on the argument that Jews should not act like the pagans next door.

I think there's a long history of Jewish interpretation that condemns Sodom for its pervasive same sex behaviors (there's something deeply troubling about ALL males in city coming to pound on Lot's door)

No. There isn't. At all. Jewish interpretation of the story's "main point" is adequately summed up by Ezekiel 16:49, which says nothing at all about sexual sin. (And where on Earth do you get the idea that ALL the males of the city came to pound on Lot's door?)

659 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:49:58pm

re: #656 Salamantis
The essential problem I see with your comment is that up until relatively recent times, a society was synonymous with religion. So your facts may be correct, but there is a difference. Most ancient wars can be seen as religious wars, and crimes were all violations of religious laws. Indeed, part of the problem we have with Islam is that they don’t have a similar schism between society and religion.

660 beermeister  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:50:48pm

For all the inane posts trying, but failing, to link Catholicism to the USSR - please realize that the religious histriocity of Russia is almost exclusively Greek Orthodox or another form of Orthodoxy. You do understand that Reagan, Thatcher and the Catholic church all played a strong role in the fall of communism, with Reagan, I believe, being the most instrumental. We need to think things through a little better. I'm out for dinner. Cheers.

661 avanti  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:56:24pm

re: #520 cherryblossoms

Warren just wants his piece of the Obama pie!

I think that's it in a nut shell he's sold millions of books, has a nice mega church and now is going to get free publicity at a major MSM event. He knows that he's quite a bit to the right of the religious trends in the main stream population with some of his views, so he tries to appear to tack to the center by deleting some web pages to broaden his appeal.
BHO, is a master of moving where he needs to be, knowing he may piss off his base but not lose them in the end.
Warren may be able to do the same and see the opportunity of a lifetime to grab the mantle of America's minister with a little percieved moderation. .

662 Haverwilde  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:57:14pm

Well, things have quieted down here, so it is a good time to wish you all the Season's best. The Solstice is past, and the New Year is coming fast. I hope to talk with all of you again in ten days. I am off to cool (but warmer than here) Arizona. Good night.
Happy New Year to you all.

663 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 7:58:25pm

re: #650 legalpad

Yes, fine - but there was/is a "Darwin link argument", whichis is what I said. You cannot deny that people have made their own custom designed philosophies using their perception of ideas that Darwin introduced. One can refer to how something is "falsely called" social Darwinism. One can also refer to falsely called "Christianity".

But a lot of times, it is not the same, such as when 85% of the 1930's German population was Christian and their ancestors had been so for centuries, yet the No True Scotsman fallacy is invoked at the very mention of the fact, even though these churches continued to hold their Sunday services, packed with parisioners, throughout the life of the Reich. That is quite different from saying that, for instance, the idea that there is some precise connection between native american spirituality and australian kangaroos, simply because someone argued for it.

It's seems like we agree regarding Hitler's contempt for conventional Christianity. It would seem that people of murderous intent use anything they can think of to advance their predetermined goals. I do not think that the basic concepts involved in actual Christianity or the ideas involved with evolution, particularly Darwin's approach, led to Hitler, Nazism, or mass-murder.

Here I agree with you; Hitler did what he did because he was Hitler. And because he could. But let us forget that he could have not done it alone. It requred the willing co-operation of millions of devout and pious Christians.

You might find this book quite informative:

[Link: www.amazon.com...]

664 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:02:08pm

re: #562 yochanan

I have an orange tomcat & he is very doggy in that he does seem to relate to humans quite deeply. & the vet said that orange toms are indeed different from most other cats.

665 Ojoe  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:03:39pm

re: #534 unrealizedviewpoint

"A cat is more intelligent than people believe, and can be taught any crime."

— Mark Twain.

666 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:04:05pm

re: #651 beermeister

re: 633 Salamantis

There WAS NO Nazi-Darwin link. What is falsely called 'social darwinism', that is, eugenics, is inherently opposed to evolutionary theory.

I believe there was a Nazi-Haeckel link and a Nazi-Nietzsche link.

Actually, Nietszche famoulsly said of his book editor, a Jewish woman, that she was most excellent and superb, going on to remark: pity the European intelligence if the Jewish intelligence were subtracted from it.

Martin Luther, on the other hand, wrote an entire book entitled On the Jews and Their Lies.

Harckel was a forger and a hack, whose embryology sketch hoax was later exposed by subsequent empirical scientists. I don't see many creastionists submitting carved frauds such as fossil dino footprints with human footprints Dremeled in to the same sceptical scrutiny.

667 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:07:27pm

re: #7 buzzsawmonkey

The Torah nowhere refers to "homosexuality," only to homosexual acts--and a case can be made that the condemnation was originally directed at such acts being done in furtherance of idolatry (there were certain cults in ancient times which conducted homosexual orgies as part of their worship rites). I don't know enough about the New Testament to comment on those translations, but the mistranslation of the "Old Testament" doesn't give me confidence.

In general, all the debate about homosexuality in the New Testament boils down to the same problem you've already touched on: are the passages against homosexual activity to be taken as blanket prohibitions, or were they intended to ban same-sex acts only within certain contexts? (The prohibited "contexts" might potentially include homosexual acts as part of pagan temple rituals, or NAMBLA-type stuff, or a free man taking sexual advantage of a male slave, or the rape of POWs, etc.)

And I don't really have more time to get into it tonight -- and I'm not an expert on NT Greek anyway -- but an enormous amount of argument has centered on the proper translation of the single word arsenokoitai. It unmistakably has something to do with male homosexuality, based on straightforward etymological analysis -- it literally implies "male persons who share a bed with men," and there's zero controversy about the point that the "share a bed" part is to be taken sexually, just like "to sleep with" is generally understood in English.

But whether it refers to every imaginable act of male homosexuality, or just certain male/male acts, is less clear -- and the problem is that the word seems to have been coined by St. Paul himself, so we can't look to earlier Greek writings for clarification.

(There are a couple other references to homosexuality in the NT, but arsenokoitai is certainly the most interesting and controversial case from a translation standpoint.)

668 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:11:16pm

re: #659 Haverwilde

The essential problem I see with your comment is that up until relatively recent times, a society was synonymous with religion. So your facts may be correct, but there is a difference. Most ancient wars can be seen as religious wars, and crimes were all violations of religious laws. Indeed, part of the problem we have with Islam is that they don’t have a similar schism between society and religion.

Kings did indeed rule by the consent of Popes in Europe, as did the Roman emperors after Constantine (which is why it's known as the Holy Roman Empire). Most wars within history have been located on the fault lines between the tectonic plates of populations that embraced differing religions. Even when they occured within a single religious population, they could be frequently traced to differences in the interpretation of that faith, such as in the thirty years was and the hundred years war.

669 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:13:54pm

re: #660 beermeister

For all the inane posts trying, but failing, to link Catholicism to the USSR - please realize that the religious histriocity of Russia is almost exclusively Greek Orthodox or another form of Orthodoxy. You do understand that Reagan, Thatcher and the Catholic church all played a strong role in the fall of communism, with Reagan, I believe, being the most instrumental. We need to think things through a little better. I'm out for dinner. Cheers.

Russian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Serbian Orthodox, and the rest of them, were once Roman Catholic; they schismed away from it, like the Protestants did - but maintained more of its ritual and liturgy than most Protestant denominations did. And more of its ecclesiastical structure.

670 legalpad  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:17:51pm

re: #663 Salamantis

Here I agree with you; Hitler did what he did because he was Hitler. And because he could. But let us forget that he could have not done it alone. It required the willing co-operation of millions of devout and pious Christians.

You might find this book quite informative:

[Link: www.amazon.com...]

Hmm - You don't seem to understand that I do not, nor have have I ever, in this thread or anywhere else, supported any connection of Darwin and Hitler in any form. I have simply acknowledged that others have argued the topic.

Are you trying to say that if only the Germans were not Christian that they would not have helped Hitler? If so, please name the culture/ideology/philosophy. I have no bubble to burst about the pristine goodness of all things Christian. If your point is to say that "the Germans were Christians", all I would say is "Duh" and "so?"

671 Throbert McGee  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:20:33pm

re: #667 Throbert McGee

But whether [the Greek word arsenokoitai] refers to every imaginable act of male homosexuality, or just certain male/male acts, is less clear

Er... I meant, "some people claim that the word is ambiguous, and hence the controversy."

Myself, I think that "males who go to bed with men" is pretty darned sweeping and blanket-y, and the fact that Paul apparently coined the term suggests to me that he may've found existing Greek words for male homosexual activity to be not all-encompassing enough.

But as I said, I'm not an expert on NT Greek.

672 Mich-again  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:22:41pm

re: #667 Throbert McGee

Re trannies, there is Deuteronomy 22:5.

A woman shall not be clothed with man's apparel, neither shall a man use woman's apparel: for he that doeth these things is abominable before God.

And the law is pretty clear on the subject of threesomes. Deuteronomy 22:10.

"Though shalt not plough with an ox and an ass together."


/

673 Mich-again  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:32:06pm

re: #669 Salamantis

they schismed away from it, like the Protestants did

Some context. The East-West schism was in 1054. Martin Luther was five centuries later. Not so much like each other.

674 hazzyday  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:32:11pm

re: #663 Salamantis

Christianity is to Hitler as Islam is to Jihadi terror.

Germany was a caucasian country that played while Hilter killed is as or more relevant than attaching Christianity to that equation.

The national socialist totalitarian state crowded out most religious ability in everyday people to think outside the mob. The human will to survive. It wasn't Christian help Hilter was getting from Christians, it was totalitarian obedience under the pain of death. Nothing Christian about it. Christianity was something Hitler was trying to replace with his blood religion.

675 SanFranciscoZionist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:32:23pm

re: #672 Mich-again

Careful, that's how the Karaites ended up banning sex on Shabbat....

I think that the Rev. Mr. Warren's views on evolution are ludicrous, and disagree strongly with his views on homosexuality (there's a distinction there), so perhaps this makes my views a little irrelevent, but their weird 'paraphrase' of the Leviticus text disturbs me. It dodges a couple of important questions, and implies that their readers are too dim to read the Bible for themselves, which as I understand it, is kind of an important thing to Protestants.

676 SanFranciscoZionist  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:36:52pm

re: #674 hazzyday

Christianity is to Hitler as Islam is to Jihadi terror.

I think that's a reasonable analogy--there's a West Wing episode where someone suggests the Christian analogy of jihadis as being the KKK, which also seems rational to me.

Do you think most folks on this site would agree to that? I hate to generalize, but I see a lot of posts that seem to imply that Islam is rotten to the core, and that there is no division between the religion and its psychotic representatives.

Christianity was something Hitler was trying to replace with his blood religion.

No argument, but there was also a long history of terrible violence against ethnic and political minorities in Central Europe long before Hitler came along, and he tapped into that, no?

677 Lynn B.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:47:21pm

Late to this thread ... as usual, but ...

Jimmy Carter's role in Habitat for Humanity is vastly overrated. I just learned this myself recently.

Basically, it amounts to a contribution of a week a year (which is no more than a number of good people with less notariety contribute on a regular basis) to ongoing projects. What they don't/can't do that Carter does is lend the name and seal of a President of the United States to the effort.

[Link: www.habitat.org...]

678 avanti  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:50:46pm

Pick the translation of Leviticus you like

* All homosexual behavior, by either men or women, or
* All sexual behavior between two men, or
* Only anal sex between two men, or
* Only anal sex in a Pagan temple ritual, or
* Sexual activity between two men in a woman's bed?

Leviticus also condemns eating shell fish, picking up sticks on the sabbath, mixing fabrics and more. Something there for everyone.

679 theheat  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:57:07pm

Suffice to say, if I had a ****, Warren and Wright could stand in line to suck it. I have no use for them, or their ilk, and I'm sick to death of political leaders dredging up religious assholes for convenience's sake, thinking they're placating which ever part of America they feel needs stroking.

Well, stroke this.

680 Lynn B.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:58:21pm

re: #34 goddessoftheclassroom

We don't know who wrote the articles or if they were sanctioned by Rev. Warren. We don't know who decided to delete them. Rev. Warren has built a HUGE ministry and is already a fixture on the national stage.

As far as I can tell, this page consists entirely to Warren's own recordings, in his own voice.

681 Mich-again  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 8:58:25pm

re: #676 SanFranciscoZionist

I think that's a reasonable analogy--there's a West Wing episode where someone suggests the Christian analogy of jihadis as being the KKK, which also seems rational to me.

Do you think most folks on this site would agree to that?

Well I can't speak for anyone but myself, but citing West Wing episodes as sources of wisdom won't get you far here. The KKK had nothing to do with the words or example of JC. On the other hand, Jihad has everything to do with the words and example of Mohammad. Hardly the same thing at all.

682 rumcrook  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:02:00pm

when I read things like that, (written by grown adults seemingly with a more than a few brain cells to rub together) I am flabergasted.

dinosours and people running around on the planet together?

why bother with this tripe? why expend energy?

it has nothing to do with the core message of christianity. so why do they spend so much energy on it.

Im a christian and I think this doesnt just border on childish it is childish.

683 Lynn B.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:08:48pm

re: #225 jacksontn

Remember when Matt Damon was making fun of Sarah Palin about the dinosaurs ...the left was really laughing about it ...well, now someone Obama has tapped to be part of his big day spiritual team who "really" thinks that way and maybe he was told it would be in Obama's best interest to take those statement off his website ...the timing just seems strange ...

That's an excellent point. My next door neighbor ... who had an Obama sign on his lawn ... was ranting about Palin for this very thing. Funny how short the memories are ...

684 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:15:18pm

re: #670 legalpad

Hmm - You don't seem to understand that I do not, nor have have I ever, in this thread or anywhere else, supported any connection of Darwin and Hitler in any form. I have simply acknowledged that others have argued the topic.

Are you trying to say that if only the Germans were not Christian that they would not have helped Hitler? If so, please name the culture/ideology/philosophy. I have no bubble to burst about the pristine goodness of all things Christian. If your point is to say that "the Germans were Christians", all I would say is "Duh" and "so?"

No, I'm not making that point. Hitler manipulated and used German Christians to carry out his genocide and wage his war by pandering to historical hates and fears that were embraced by many of them. I agree with you that had another religion with its own historical hates and fears been predominant there instead, he would have endeavored to manipulate them in the same manner, choosing faith-appropriate scapegoats. And with a significant probability of success.

685 avanti  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:17:23pm

re: #682 rumcrook

when I read things like that, (written by grown adults seemingly with a more than a few brain cells to rub together) I am flabergasted.

dinosours and people running around on the planet together?

why bother with this tripe? why expend energy?

it has nothing to do with the core message of christianity. so why do they spend so much energy on it.

Im a christian and I think this doesnt just border on childish it is childish.

I can only pass on the discussion on the issue with by then Naval Academy midshipman I sponsored. His take was that if the Genesis story in the Bible was not taken to be 100% true, then why not suspect other passages.
I could not even get him to agree that the worlds languages did not start at the Tower of Babylon. I felt badly for the kid, not because of that, but because of his grief that my wife and I were going to hell and we were like second parents to him The good news is his faith will make him a honest Naval officer, nice kid.

686 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:18:58pm

re: #673 Mich-again

Some context. The East-West schism was in 1054. Martin Luther was five centuries later. Not so much like each other.

One was twice as far from now as was the other. And 50% farther removed from Jesus' time. Not extremely similar, but not vastly different, either.

I did note that the splitter in the earlier Orthodox schism retained more of the Roman Catholic ritual, liturgy and ecclesiastical structure than did the splitting Protestants. But they both retained Christianity.

687 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:21:09pm

re: #674 hazzyday

Christianity is to Hitler as Islam is to Jihadi terror.

Germany was a caucasian country that played while Hilter killed is as or more relevant than attaching Christianity to that equation.

The national socialist totalitarian state crowded out most religious ability in everyday people to think outside the mob. The human will to survive. It wasn't Christian help Hilter was getting from Christians, it was totalitarian obedience under the pain of death. Nothing Christian about it. Christianity was something Hitler was trying to replace with his blood religion.

Did you know that German churches were so fond of displaying swastikas in religious services that Hitler had to institute his own variant of church-state separation?

688 Salamantis  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:27:20pm

re: #681 Mich-again

Well I can't speak for anyone but myself, but citing West Wing episodes as sources of wisdom won't get you far here. The KKK had nothing to do with the words or example of JC. On the other hand, Jihad has everything to do with the words and example of Mohammad. Hardly the same thing at all.

KKKers have used the Biblical story of Ham, who viewed his father Noah's drunken nakedness and was punished by God by being burned with a mark to signify that he and all his decendants would henceforth and forever be slaves, to justify slavery the US, interpreting the God-burned mark as blackness. And Jesus never directly addressed slavery, but Paul said that slaves should be subservient to their masters, and not use the fact that they were both Christian as a lever with which to pry more favorable or lenient treatment from them.

689 Alberta Oil Peon  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:41:29pm

re: #607 Noam Sayin'

He moves the traps, after licking off the peanut butter.

Noam, use raisins as bait in the mouse traps. You can really wedge then tightly into the trigger of the trap; they stay fresh and tempting for days or weeks, and mice really go for them. I've caught as many as 3 mice off one raisin, so it's economical, too. And raisins aren't messy to deal with, or to clean up later.

690 Lynn B.  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 9:41:58pm

re: #590 Naso Tang

He is clearly another sociopathic criminal. Wasn't it your contention that it is the lack of religion that causes such behavior?

And you evidence for that is ... what, exactly?

Never mind. There is none. Madoff may be many unpleasant things, but to date there's absolutely no evidence that he is even remotely a sociopath.

691 CharlieBravo  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 10:18:19pm

When I read stuff like this I keep thinking there will be a Godzilla joke at the end or something... good grief, they are serious. Sad situation.

692 Zack  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 10:20:57pm

Old name: Saddleback Church
New name: Brokeback Church

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

693 lostlakehiker  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 10:29:07pm

re: #3 Cathypop

So now sex is bad?

To be fair, what Warren's church was saying was that sexual sin is bad. And then they explain what they mean by that.

It's a parallel legal structure, with its own code, its own laws, and its own court opinions and disputes at the margin. No one will try, these days, to force you to abide by those rules or live by that law, but the church does exhort people to do so. And not all sex is bad.

To make an analogy, in the secular world, alcohol is not bad. But underage drinking is bad. You can't drink unless the authorities have pronounced you man and drink. And even then, you can't drink too many drinks at the same time. Polydrinkamy is forbidden. etc.

694 FloatingRock  Mon, Dec 22, 2008 11:00:17pm
From the very beginning of creation, God gave man dominion over all that was made, even over the dinosaurs.


If men shared the earth with dinosaurs the men were certainly not dominant.

More like food.

695 yochanan  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 2:37:10am

i find this whole Christian bashing to be offensive, and i am not a Christian. this isn't the LGF THAT I JOINED AFTER SEPT 11TH. I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE OF FAITH ARE FINDING THIS TO BE A VERY UNFRIENDLY PLACE THE SECULAR HATE I SEE ON THIS THREAD IS WHAT I REMEMBER COMING FROM THE FAR LEFT AND WHAT I WOULD EXPECT FROM KOS.

and yes i am using caps because i feel like i have lost a friend and am very hurt buy what i read on this thread and the recent personal attacks i have had in here one were i was under anti semitic attack and the other were if you defend such groups as the BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA you get attacked for being a 'homophobe'

696 leereyno  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:01:49am

re: #20 buzzsawmonkey

Too bad Warren's church couldn't have achieved a synergy and posited that the dinosaurs died out because they were gay.

Everyone knows they died out because of anthropogenic global cooling.

697 leereyno  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:04:15am

re: #695 yochanan

i find this whole Christian bashing to be offensive

You're offended? Oh no, not that! We'll be very sure to silence ourselves and refrain from every saying anything that doesn't meet with your approval from now on.

698 yochanan  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:50:14am

bashing is still bashing and I doubt anyone would say it to your face in person as you might get a 5 of ♣'s

699 Mr Secul  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:50:40am

Has anyone seen this stuff before?

Check out this page. I quote:

Facilitator Guide provides everything needed for a person with little or no knowledge of intelligent design or evolutionary theory to lead a stimulating study that could include group discussion (one guide for both DVDs).

That just about sums it up. It gives people the confidence to debate a subject that they know little or nothing about. Or maybe I should have said to prepare others to debate a subject to which they know little or nothing.

Talk about a contempt for knowledge.

I wonder if we have seen the products of Redeeming Darwin here at the LGF?

700 yochanan  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:52:10am

re: #697 leereyno

You're offended? Oh no, not that! We'll be very sure to silence ourselves and refrain from every saying anything that doesn't meet with your approval from now on.

HATCHLINGS SHOULD BE SEEN AND NOT HEARD

701 Mr Secul  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:53:44am

re: #699 Mr Secul

Talk about a contempt for knowledge.

Redeeming Darwin: No Knowledge Required.

You can order it as a double pack with Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.

702 Annar  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 4:44:52am

re: #2 mean Gene

Good for Google saving this.

I liked this paragraph:

Why would he delete it?

Maybe he's coming out on inauguration day.
/sarc

703 legalpad  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 4:53:58am

re: #684 Salamantis

No, I'm not making that point. Hitler manipulated and used German Christians to carry out his genocide and wage his war by pandering to historical hates and fears that were embraced by many of them. I agree with you that had another religion with its own historical hates and fears been predominant there instead, he would have endeavored to manipulate them in the same manner, choosing faith-appropriate scapegoats. And with a significant probability of success.

OK. But that can't have been your original point. It seemed you thought I thought Christians had gone through history without - - something. I'm not really sure what point you were trying to make. Oh well. Dead thread anyway.

704 Charlie R  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 5:09:59am

Well it seems what really lights the fires of indignation here is the mere mention of those horrible creatures (Bible believing Christians) who are trying to co-exist with the more "evolved" evolutionists. These Christians should be taught to keep their barbaric thoughts to themselves and to not embarrass us in front of the world. The USA could take valuable lessons from the Chinese on how to deal with these pesky people. How dare anyone challenge the theory of evolution. Fortunately those who have evolved to the next level have justification for feeling as they do being the superior creatures they are. After all darwinianism fosters justification for many groups of people. Darwinism enables atheism, devalues humankind, and fosters meaninglessness, sexual immorality, racism, and Nazism. Darwin's magnum opus The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection has a less known subtitle: Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. According to you demigod In The Descent of Man Darwin wrote, "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world."
So to the enlightened and privileged here your task is before you, are you up to it?
The Christian hatred I see here is a precursor of coming events of which most of you will gladly participate.

705 jaws  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 5:21:38am

As a thinking and discerning Christian, I feel frustration when Christians attempt to use the Bible as some sort of empirical argument against the theory of evolution. It's impossible and embarrassing. Their intent is well meant in that they believe the Bible is the word of the living God, and therefore impeccable. But, it is filled with myth, allegory, metaphor, and stark contradiction, which is why Bible scholars still - after hundreds of years -struggle with its meaning. The point of the Bible is that we do not exist by accident from random cosmic chance, but are created by a loving God., and there is a wonderful story that culminated in the person of Jesus.

Labeling those who believe in the premise we are manifest by a higher intelligence as unilaterally unscientific is inaccurate. The Church claims some very noted and dedicated people of science. Some of us Christians are empirically minded. Also,, labeling those who embrace evolution as 'godless' or by necessity 'A-Theistic' is insultingly simplistic.

The most someone like me can draw is that we have no idea how God works, except that He does. "Man was created on the sixth day". Well, how long is a "day" to an infinite, eternal, omnipotent source of creation?

The bottom line is the people who are tenaciously embracing creationism at the exclusion of evolutionism feel threatened by what they perceive as an increasingly cold and secular society, and are responding from that point of view. But, the onus is on them to respond intelligently instead of emotionally.

706 irish rose  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 6:15:54am
The Christian hatred I see here is a precursor of coming events of which most of you will gladly participate.

Oh, for heavens' sake.
Enough of the false martrydom, please.

I'm a Christian and a longtime member here. Unlike you and many other kneejerk Christians, I don't feel threatened by intelligent conversation about evolution/creationism. I don't feel the need to put on some false mantle of victimhood because I'm a Christian in the presence of atheists and agnostics here at LGF, many of whom I genuinely like and respect. I don't feel some obsessive compulsion to bludgeon unbelievers or convert everyone in the house to my way of thinking. I'm also intelligent enough to understand that our hosts' interest in this topic does not in any way suggest that he is a "Christ-hater".

So please.... either jump off of the "end-times martrydom for Christ" bandwagon and offer something intelligent to the discussion, or find another place to post.

The knee-jerk defensiveness and hostility from "aggrieved" Christian people who feel compelled to roll around in the dust here at LGF and throw ashes over their pious heads is becoming very tedious.... it makes temperate, intelligent and engaging Christians who enjoy an invigorating conversation look just as bad as those who insist on turning every venue that they encounter into their own personal "soapbox for the Lord".

I don't feel disenfranchised or dismissed because of my beliefs here at LGF and these discussions don't trouble me in the slightest. Here's why: the agenda of the Discovery Institute is a subversive, destructive and manipulative agenda, and I'm not willing to excuse it because the perpetrators claim to be "good religious folk". I resent what these people are doing under the sanctimonious, comfy-cozy blanket of "Christendom", and I don't like what they are doing in the name of Christ.

You shouldn't, either.

707 irish rose  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 6:28:32am

Yochanon,

My feeling is that many religious people here are incapable of standing up for themselves in an environment outside of their insulated faith communities, where everyone who participates is not of the same mindset.
They are shocked and surprised to find atheists and agnostics joining in the discussion and they feel frustrated when they can't persuade others to their way of thinking.

Unfortunately it's called the "real world", something that all too many religious folk are detached from and not prepared to deal with.... the world that exists outside of the church building, temple, and synagogue.

It's very easy to be a Christian or a believer when you practice your faith inside of an insular, warm, protected world of acceptance and like-mindedness. Not so easy to do it when you are challenged by real unbelievers out in a world that is often cold and unfriendly.

I guess that we each have to decide for ourselves, what kind of believers we're going to be. Social, feel-good community believers, or the type to get out there and do the hard work in an unfriendly word. The former requires very little in the way of tolerance and perseverence, the latter requires both.

708 rumcrook  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 7:15:27am

685 avanti

thats a tough one... reasoned argument that god gave us these words for a higher moral and spiritual purpose than as a scientific treatise rpopbably wouldnt make a dent.

when I have had this discusion I usually ask people why god would try to explain complicated scientific issues to a bunch of beduins in tents?

he wouldnt. he only gave them what they could comprehend and thats why the bible has been an evolving spiritual word. not a science book.

and in fact if gods laws were immutable and unchangable, why dont we stone people any more?

jesus who is god (to us christians) changed it. did he change his mind? why did he do that?

spiritual growth thats why. first get people into monothiesm, instead of worshiping rocks and trees (worshipping the symptom of a universal creator instead of the universal creator) and when the basics of this are in place evolve the (lol I said evolve) story.


honestly people should stop being so concrete. its a guide for thier spiritual life and growth not a field manual on the geologic record.

709 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 7:21:16am

re: #704 Charlie R

How dare anyone challenge the theory of evolution.

Actually, those here arguing the issue of ID vs evolution have exactly the opposite position to the one you state here. If ID actually challenged evolutionary theory, if it actually had some empirical evidence to back it up, we wouldn't have as much of a problem with it. However, there isn't any. PLEASE, by all means, challenge evolutionary theory! Every prior challenge to date has ended up adding more evidence to the mountain that supports the theory of evolution.

Darwinism enables atheism, devalues humankind, and fosters meaninglessness, sexual immorality, racism, and Nazism.

Yeah, and I saw Darwinism kicking a puppy yesterday. Evolution is a scientific theory, it cannot, in and of itself, do ANY of the things you're attributing to it with this statement.

According to you demigod In The Descent of Man Darwin wrote, "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world."

Ah, so you're saying the destruction of species by man is evolution's fault, simply because Darwin predicted it? Come on.

So to the enlightened and privileged here your task is before you, are you up to it?
The Christian hatred I see here is a precursor of coming events of which most of you will gladly participate.

That many here will fight to keep non-science out of the science classroom is not the same as Christian hatred. I was raised Christian, and respect them. If only the Biblical literalists were capable of the same respect for the field of science.

710 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:00:25am

re: #695 yochanan

i find this whole Christian bashing to be offensive, and i am not a Christian. this isn't the LGF THAT I JOINED AFTER SEPT 11TH. I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE OF FAITH ARE FINDING THIS TO BE A VERY UNFRIENDLY PLACE THE SECULAR HATE I SEE ON THIS THREAD IS WHAT I REMEMBER COMING FROM THE FAR LEFT AND WHAT I WOULD EXPECT FROM KOS.

If it wasn't for a small percentage of Christians trying to push a creationist agenda into science classrooms, this whole conversation wouldn't even be happening. Don't try to turn this into a secular attack on Christianity, when in fact it's the Christian creation literalists attacking the fundamentals of science.

As an aside, I'm an Eagle Scout myself. I've defended the organization on many occasions, both conversationally and monetarily, and I can't recall any occasion where I was labelled a 'homophobe' for doing so.

711 Zimriel  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:05:46am

re: #73 Wishing

I am decidedly out of the loop, believing neither that Jesus was born on Christmas, nor that he resurrected on Easter.
Things are just getting harder. Rick Warren hiding stuff in the memory hole doesn't surprise me at all.
If you have nothing with dying for, you have nothing worth living for.

You're not that out of the loop; nobody really thinks Jesus was born at the same time the Persian archangel Mithra was born. It's common knowledge that Christmas was picked out of a bevy of pagan holidays to coincide with the winter solstice. Of the four gospels (or five if you count Thomas), only two even have a Nativity and of those two, Luke 2:8-20 involves shepherds out in the field, which implies a non-midwinter season.

We celebrate Christmas at the solstice because we humans have attached the symbolism to Christ's birth. From a Christian perspective: God doesn't tell us what we do with Christmas, because he wants us to concentrate more upon Easter and Holy Week.

712 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:20:31am

re: #711 Zimriel


We celebrate Christmas at the solstice because we humans have attached the symbolism to Christ's birth. From a Christian perspective: God doesn't tell us what we do with Christmas, because he wants us to concentrate more upon Easter and Holy Week.

I recall when I was attending church regularly, that there was a service each spring which celebrated (according to best estimates) Jesus' actual birth day.

713 Zimriel  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:25:27am

re: #676 SanFranciscoZionist

--there's a West Wing episode where someone suggests the Christian analogy of jihadis as being the KKK, which also seems rational to me.

I saw that "teach-in" episode of the West Wing. As it played out, first Smugly Secular Asian Kid made the analogy between the jihadis and "the Religious Right". Then Bartlett's man corrected him and said the jihadis were closer to the KKK. That WW episode implicitly rejected the idea that Christianity leads to the KKK.

Sorkin isn't as moonbat as you think. Go watch Charlie Wilson's War again.

One might take the WW ep to imply that there is a cultural continuum between the KKK and "the Religious Right" (as smugly secular kids see it). And there are candidates for this sort of thing, such as the culture of the backcountry white South. But the episode doesn't blame this culture on Christianity.

714 Charles  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 10:18:49am

re: #695 yochanan

i find this whole Christian bashing to be offensive, and i am not a Christian. this isn't the LGF THAT I JOINED AFTER SEPT 11TH. I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE OF FAITH ARE FINDING THIS TO BE A VERY UNFRIENDLY PLACE THE SECULAR HATE I SEE ON THIS THREAD IS WHAT I REMEMBER COMING FROM THE FAR LEFT AND WHAT I WOULD EXPECT FROM KOS.

Since you're spamming us with this obnoxious comment, I'll post my reply to you again to make sure you see it:

If you continue posting this yelling, hostile message, I'm going to block your account. It's abusive.

And this thin-skinned whining about "Christian bashing" isn't getting any more appealing than the last time it came up. If you have a problem with someone's comments take it up with them directly.

It's a phony argument to say that "LGF bashes Christians," because I do not. And the vast majority of the commenters do not. This is a dishonest characterization.

715 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 12:17:25pm

re: #695 yochanan

i find this whole Christian bashing to be offensive, and i am not a Christian. this isn't the LGF THAT I JOINED AFTER SEPT 11TH. I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE OF FAITH ARE FINDING THIS TO BE A VERY UNFRIENDLY PLACE THE SECULAR HATE I SEE ON THIS THREAD IS WHAT I REMEMBER COMING FROM THE FAR LEFT AND WHAT I WOULD EXPECT FROM KOS.

and yes i am using caps because i feel like i have lost a friend and am very hurt buy what i read on this thread and the recent personal attacks i have had in here one were i was under anti semitic attack and the other were if you defend such groups as the BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA you get attacked for being a 'homophobe'

You wanna hear bashing? Lemme quote some to you from a post just a few posts under yours:

re: #704 Charlie R

After all darwinianism fosters justification for many groups of people. Darwinism enables atheism, devalues humankind, and fosters meaninglessness, sexual immorality, racism, and Nazism.

And let's no forget your own bashing on this very thread:

re: #346 yochanan

i find secularism to be an empty life style which leads offen to evil as it is not grounded in anything

You went on to claim that Hitler was an atheist. Historians have called Hitler many things, belief-wise. They have called him a Christian (he himself told people around him that he was Catholic, which is how he was raised), a Pagan (even though neither Hitler or any of his inner circle were members of the Thule Society, which was the German Pagan group most popularly - and falsely - associated with him), and, most likely, a cynical, manipulative and power-hungry political opportunist, who harbored no compunctions about using anything or anyone he found to be useful in order to realize his goals and desires. But no credible and solidly referenced scholarship has ever claimed that he was an atheist. What he seems to come closest to is a nondenominational Theist, who embraces the idea of an active God, but does not adhere to any particular sectarian doctrine concerning such a deity.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

So you bitch, whine and moan about religion-bashing when other people quote regrettable religious history in response to your false Godwinian shoveling of Adolph Hitler into the secular bin, but meanwhile feel free to slime other peoples' life choices as empty paths to evil. Can anyone say hypocritical double standard?

I think Jesus said it best in Matthew 7:3 -

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

716 JakeSpiderMonkey  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 12:17:40pm

Fellow Lizards,

I consider myself as a Christian, even though it's hard for me to break some of my sins. I don't know Rick Warren is going to do during the prayer during the inauguration. I enjoy going to this website because I like hearing other peoples' opinions on current issues at a conservative viewpoint.

What I do know is many Christians such as Pentecostals can't accept Mormons is because Jesus will only come back to earth is during the rapture. This might be in a matter of years or decades.

In addition to this, I have a cousin of mine in Columbia, SC told me that Mormons believe that on Judgment Day, if a Mormon's loved one did not accept Jesus Christ as their lord & savior, God will ask a question to the unsaved one, "Do you believe that Jesus Christ rose from the dead? " If this person says, "yes", they will be saved and spend eternity with their loved ones.

Also, my preacher cousin Reese told me I think what he said was, "Once you spend eternity with God in the heavens, you can have your own planet in which you will run it and be like God."

The way our government runs things, I don't think I would like to be a God.

717 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 12:51:41pm

re: #716 JakeSpiderMonkey


Also, my preacher cousin Reese told me I think what he said was, "Once you spend eternity with God in the heavens, you can have your own planet in which you will run it and be like God."

The way our government runs things, I don't think I would like to be a God.

Or even a President. Seriously, winding up running a planet for all eternity sounds more like a kind of hell to me. . .nothing but endless complaints :) It'd certainly be hell for the poor inhabitants of that hypothetical world. I can scarcely keep my own budget under control, let alone manage all the intricacies of an entire world full of cultures.

"oops. . .looks like the magnetic field broke down again. I KNEW putting off the 5 million year scheduled maintenance was a bad idea."

718 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 1:02:27pm

re: #704 Charlie R

Well it seems what really lights the fires of indignation here is the mere mention of those horrible creatures (Bible believing Christians) who are trying to co-exist with the more "evolved" evolutionists. These Christians should be taught to keep their barbaric thoughts to themselves and to not embarrass us in front of the world. The USA could take valuable lessons from the Chinese on how to deal with these pesky people. How dare anyone challenge the theory of evolution. Fortunately those who have evolved to the next level have justification for feeling as they do being the superior creatures they are. After all darwinianism fosters justification for many groups of people. Darwinism enables atheism, devalues humankind, and fosters meaninglessness, sexual immorality, racism, and Nazism. Darwin's magnum opus The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection has a less known subtitle: Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. According to you demigod In The Descent of Man Darwin wrote, "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world."
So to the enlightened and privileged here your task is before you, are you up to it?
The Christian hatred I see here is a precursor of coming events of which most of you will gladly participate.

I will ignore your many false and gratuitous ad hominems, since they were competently handled upthread, and focus on your sole specific claim that Charles Darwin advocated, or at least foresaw, a future of racial genocide.

First, the subtitle of Origin of Species mentioning races refers back to the title, having to do with species. This reference could not have been to the any supposedly different human races, because the entire book is about not humans, but animals.

Second, while his subsequent comment in The Descent of Man, "At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor
Schaaffhausen has remarked,* will no doubt be exterminated.", indubitably refers to the physical eradication of the great apes, something which is indeed inadvertently proceeding apace as their habitat progressively disappears, the comment to which you refer could just as well be referring to the eradication of more primitive cultures by more civilized ones (a memetic eradication), where the individuals comprising such cultures are not physically killed, but rather leave their parent cultures for more technologically advanced ones. He does not exempt white folks from having to do this, too, as his very next comment states:

"The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it
will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may
hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon,
instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla."

Now perhaps Darwin was referring to "the negro or Australian" in cultural terms, and perhaps in racial terms. If the latter, we must acknowledge that he was indeed to that extent a man of his times, a time when even Abraham Lincoln was quick to proclaim that his emancipation of blacks in no way indicated that he considered them to be equal to whites.

[Link: albensonjr.com...]

But if Darwin indeed considered caucasians, blacks, asians, and australian aboriginals to be differing subspecies of homo sapiens and some to be more evolutionarily 'advanced' (a word that properly does not belong in evolutionary theory, as environmental selection favors genetic mutations that do not augur progress toward some abstract ideal, but instead more efficiently exploit particular ecological niches), contemporary Christian biologists such as Louis Agassiz considered blacks to be an altogether different - and inferior - species altogether from caucasians:

[Link: home.att.net...]

to be continued...

719 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 1:06:33pm

continued from # 718

Let us also not forget that, without the impetus provided by the discoveries of Darwin and Mendel, Watson & Crick would most likely not have been prompted to search for the physical substrate by means of which evolution and trait inheritance proceeds, and hence would not have discovered and isolated DNA. And it was by means of DNA analyses that it was conclusively demonstrated that there is indeed only one human race, and that all of us are members of it.

720 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 1:57:39pm

re: #719 Salamantis

And it was by means of DNA analyses that it was conclusively demonstrated that there is indeed only one human race, and that all of us are members of it.

Excellent point.

721 littleO  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 2:16:57pm

Sal., this ones for you. I know your lurking out there.
Maybe God didn't make dinosaurs. He only made dinosaur bones.

722 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 2:26:29pm

(from a long-time reader, first time poster)

I am ambivalent about this website's recent attacks on Christian creationists. Sometimes it reminds me of libtards and moral relativists who apologize for Islam by pointing out a similar practice or belief in Christianity, Judaism, and other religions. Many of us started reading this site as a clearinghouse for news and information on the global war on terrorism. Call it what you will, Christian creationism has NOTHING to do with that war. Instead, posts like these soothe those moral relativists and atheists who see ALL religions as the enemy, and not just radical Islam. That is a very dangerous and naive view, in my opinion.

723 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 2:31:06pm

re: #721 littleO

Sal., this ones for you. I know your lurking out there.
Maybe God didn't make dinosaurs. He only made dinosaur bones.

Yeah, right, shuuuure; a God who would gratuitously inscribe lies to people in the book of nature is just the kinda God who would inspire reverence and respect...

724 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 2:37:40pm

re: #722 jonahsand

(from a long-time reader, first time poster)

I am ambivalent about this website's recent attacks on Christian creationists. Sometimes it reminds me of libtards and moral relativists who apologize for Islam by pointing out a similar practice or belief in Christianity, Judaism, and other religions.

This website hasn't attacked Christian creationists. It has attacked attempts BY creationists (and not just Christian ones) to insert something which is not science, into the science classroom. I'm one of those here who are opposed to that, and yet I have a great deal of respect for Christians and their beliefs. I challenge you to find a topic on this site that attacks Christians (and no, topics attacking attempts to force ID into science classrooms don't count, as they're not attacks on Christianity in general). Go ahead. I won't hold my breath though.

Now, that said, welcome aboard!

Instead, posts like these soothe those moral relativists and atheists who see ALL religions as the enemy, and not just radical Islam. That is a very dangerous and naive view, in my opinion.

Comments like that read like an attack on those who don't share your beliefs, in a post in which you're complaining about people attacking your beliefs. I believe there's a word in the dictionary for that.

725 FloatingRock  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 2:54:27pm

re: #722 jonahsand

posts like these soothe those moral relativists and atheists who see ALL religions as the enemy, and not just radical Islam. That is a very dangerous and naive view, in my opinion.

Just because Islam is more violent than Christianity doesn't mean that fundamentalists of other stripes don't also pose a threat; in this case to science and it's foundation in rational thought.

726 cracker-crusader  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 2:54:31pm

I really get sick and tired of hearing about how faith and science are irreconcilable. Take a course in Analytic Number Theory, or in Algebraic Topology, study quantum field theory, and so on. There really is no basis for rejecting nor accepting God in any science discipline. Period. (I should know, I am a scientist, well OK a mathematician, so hardly dumb and prone to wishful thinking!)

Acceptance of God and the Resurrection is a matter of faith, always will be (duh, that's why it's called "faith", Charles.) I choose to humble myself in suggesting, about the Resurrection, "I wasn't there, I'll have to take it on faith based on the testimony of the witnesses in the Gospels, and if I'm wrong, so be it."

On the other hand, there is much wrong with the hypothesis of evolution. For starters it is not supported by the current scientific research paradigm: REPRODUCIBLE BLOOMIN" RESULTS! Period. If you don't get this, you don't get what the scientific method IS. Sorry, random mutations in fruitflies does not an evolutionary theory make! That's like claiming that cancer proves evolution.

In order for me to accept the hypothesis, and elevate it to the status of theory, I'll need to see you start with one species, and end with another. If you can't do that, well you're just talking philosophy, and in that there is no discussion.

The fossil record is incomplete. It always will be. Evolution is a fine hypothesis, not one I believe in because I understand something about continuous time Markov Chains. But whatever. But to claim evolution is somehow on a par with General Relativity or Quantum Mechanics is utter bull. Reproducible results, please.

Or as Ernest Rutherford said:

"The only real science is Physics. All the rest is just stamp-collecting."

727 FloatingRock  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:07:56pm

re: #726 cracker-crusader

In order for me to accept the hypothesis, and elevate it to the status of theory, I'll need to see you start with one species, and end with another.


You mean like whales evolving back into the oceans?

728 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:25:28pm

re: #724 Yashmak

I challenge you to find a topic on this site that attacks Christians

I never said the site attacks Christians. I said the site attacks "Christian creationists." To the extent attacks on Christian creationists are attacks on religious beliefs that frankly are widespread in Judeo-Christian thought and other faith systems, I think they are counterproductive to the fight against Islam.

729 FloatingRock  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:31:15pm

re: #728 jonahsand

I said the site attacks "Christian creationists."

Which is still an inaccurate statement. We're defending ourselves and science, an institution separate from the church, from Christian creationists; not attacking them. Suggesting we are attacking them is an example of moral relativism. It's like accusing somebody that shoots a rapist that broke into their home of "attacking" them.

730 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:41:15pm

re: #726 cracker-crusader


On the other hand, there is much wrong with the hypothesis of evolution. For starters it is not supported by the current scientific research paradigm: REPRODUCIBLE BLOOMIN" RESULTS! Period. If you don't get this, you don't get what the scientific method IS.

No offense, but when I read that comment, "you don't get what the scientific method is" was the first thing I thought too. . .

Reproducible bloomin' results, like. . .for instance. . .multiple fossils of the same transitional species like Archeopteryx? Reproducible results like populations of lizards who evolve the ability to digest foods that the root species cannot over just a few generations? Tens of thousands of reproducible DNA tests providing supporting evidence for the theory? These are just a few examples of the many 'reproducible results' backing up evolutionary theory. Sure, there are differences in the types of results used by varying fields of science, because the types of evidence supporting one field may not be applicable to another, but just because one type of evidence may not be applicable to your particular field of study doesn't make it less valid for another.

It's nice that you're proud of your particular branch of science. I'm proud of mine too (aerospace). But the condescension in your comment is unwarranted. There's plenty of evidence to elevate Evolution to a Theory.

731 Yashmak  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 3:55:14pm

re: #728 jonahsand

I never said the site attacks Christians. I said the site attacks "Christian creationists." To the extent attacks on Christian creationists are attacks on religious beliefs that frankly are widespread in Judeo-Christian thought and other faith systems, I think they are counterproductive to the fight against Islam.

The only Christian creationists under attack on this site, are those who are attempting to push non-science into the science classroom. Some few commenters may have made statements attacking creationists in general, but issues with those comments should be directed at the people who made them, not the site as a whole.

732 Mr Secul  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 4:29:29pm

re: #721 littleO

Sal., this ones for you. I know your lurking out there.
Maybe God didn't make dinosaurs. He only made dinosaur bones.

Dangerous theological argument: God the faker! Forger of evidence, a trickster.

Imagine if it was true...

733 hermit  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 4:32:50pm

re: #722 jonahsand

(from a long-time reader, first time poster)
Call it what you will, Christian creationism has NOTHING to do with that war.

Welcome. Glad you're posting. Interesting opinion.
Now for the Truth: Yes, this debate has everything to do with the war.

If you haven't noticed, the Islamists happen to have decided they love Creationism. They will use the useful idiots in America to their own ends by supporting their "valiant struggle." The debate here on LGF is NOT, I repeat NOT about bashing Christians and never has been. It's about anti-idiotarianism - or the useful idiots who don't see the danger of their position.

Many Creationists are sadly courting the jihadis by engaging in this battle. When you read the commenters who support Creationism, you will see their faulty logic and realize they are headed out toward the margins where they will be adopted by the "understanding" Islamists. It is already happening.

Read back and learn - I did. I am a Catholic believing Christian and I have NEVER seen a Christian attacked unless he/she was first showing a tendency to idiotarianism. This was has many levels.

734 hermit  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 4:34:01pm

re: #733 hermit

war has many levels
PIMF

735 hermit  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 4:40:29pm

re: #718 Salamantis

Dammit, Sal. If I weren't a hermit and you a pagan....

There are some threads when I just want to ask you to marry me! LOL!

736 Mr Secul  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 4:55:43pm

re: #718 Salamantis

Second, while his subsequent comment in The Descent of Man, "At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor
Schaaffhausen has remarked,* will no doubt be exterminated.", indubitably refers to the physical eradication of the great apes

A quick Google finds this. And a text search in the page finds this:

The anthropomorphous apes, namely the gorilla, chimpanzee, orang, and Hylobates, are by most naturalists separated from the other Old World monkeys, as a distinct sub-group.

And the author is Charles Darwin, so its clear what he means by the term.

-PS

I know that you know what the term means, I was posting for anyone else who may misinterpret the term.

737 Mr Secul  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 5:05:53pm

re: #727 FloatingRock

You mean like whales evolving back into the oceans?

I think he means it literally, he wants something like this.

738 Mr Secul  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 5:35:51pm

re: #726 cracker-crusader

On the other hand, there is much wrong with the hypothesis of evolution. For starters it is not supported by the current scientific research paradigm: REPRODUCIBLE BLOOMIN" RESULTS! Period. If you don't get this, you don't get what the scientific method IS.

You have either misunderstood or you are being disingenuous.

We can't make quasars but we can observe them, we can observe stars but we can't make them. We can't command atoms to spontaneously decay but we can, repeatedly, measure the half life of a radioactive substance.

I don't think that we can make volcanoes, or hurricanes but we can observe them.

We can detect the presence of extremely short lived particles due to the trails they leave in bubble chambers. We don't see the particles themselves, we deduce their existence from the available evidence. (You seem to have a high regard for physics, so I threw that one in just for you.)

There are many things in science that we can't create at will but we can observe them or the evidence for them when they occur.

This applies equally well to evolution.

For example...

You can track evolution in marine sediments, you can watch species arrive and depart, some species had world wide distributions and can be traced across large tracts of the world's oceans. The observations are reproducible at will. (Just take some core samples of marine sediments, prepare slides, switch on your ipod and sit down for hours on end and take notes of what you see.)

Sorry, random mutations in fruitflies does not an evolutionary theory make! That's like claiming that cancer proves evolution.

Funny that, Darwin's theory predates those experiments so it looks like you don't know what he based his theory on. Or you just wanted to knock fruit flies. (what have people got against them?)

In order for me to accept the hypothesis, and elevate it to the status of theory, I'll need to see you start with one species, and end with another. If you can't do that, well you're just talking philosophy, and in that there is no discussion.

OK look here.

The fossil record is incomplete. It always will be.

Indeed, but why does that matter? We can't observe every particle in the universe but that doesn't stop us from doing science.

Evolution is a fine hypothesis

No, evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution is a theory.

, not one I believe in because I understand something about continuous time Markov Chains. But whatever. But to claim evolution is somehow on a par with General Relativity or Quantum Mechanics is utter bull. Reproducible results, please.

Or as Ernest Rutherford said:

"The only real science is Physics. All the rest is just stamp-collecting."

Yawn.

739 joekowalski247  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 6:00:13pm

OHHHH Geeeeez! Dinosaurs and gays again?

740 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 6:06:03pm

re: #722 jonahsand

(from a long-time reader, first time poster)

I am ambivalent about this website's recent attacks on Christian creationists. Sometimes it reminds me of libtards and moral relativists who apologize for Islam by pointing out a similar practice or belief in Christianity, Judaism, and other religions. Many of us started reading this site as a clearinghouse for news and information on the global war on terrorism. Call it what you will, Christian creationism has NOTHING to do with that war. Instead, posts like these soothe those moral relativists and atheists who see ALL religions as the enemy, and not just radical Islam. That is a very dangerous and naive view, in my opinion.

This site is one of the best sites on the net to learn about aspects of the GWOT that, whether by accidence or advertence or inattention or intention, escape the MSM's attention. But that is far from all that it is. It is also an anti-idiotarian site in general. And educationally imperialist creationists, such as the Discovery Institute and their supporters, that are relentlessly attempting to hijack the science classes in public high schools in order to indoctrinate other peoples' children into their pet religious dogmas, are idiotarians, too, just like eurofascists who try to gain public credibility by piggybacking on the antijihadi movement, costing it public credibility in the process, and people who try to press the US to spend trillions of dollars in order to cripple its own energy grid, with no assurance of significant ecological benefit. It is the egregiously unconstitutional attempts of some hegemonistic creationists to coercively impose their sectarian doctrines of the children of the American public at large that are the targets of this site's concerned attention, not their right to hold their religious belief. But it would be negligent to subject these folks to scrutiny and yet not to mention the connections some of these folks have to Islamocreationists such as Harun Yahya when such connections are, umm, Discovered.

Apologists for these various strains of idiotarianism cannot shed themselves of their own status as idiotarians by disapprovingly pointing at other idiotarian strains. Likewise, slandering the secular in an attempt to garner religious sympathy, and connecting secularism to Islamicist apologia doesn't fly, either. Some of the most stalwart antijihadists around are secularist, even atheists: Ibn Warraq (author of Why I Am Not A Muslim), Allahpundit of Hot Air, Christopher Hitchens, Bill Whittle, Wretchard of The Belmont Club, Robert Spencer of Jihadwatch, Ayan Hirsi Ali...the list could go on and on. In fact, secularists and atheists have every reason to oppose the most violent, virulent and coercively imperialist fundamentalist religiosities on the planet: Salafist Wahhab-Qutb Al Qaedan Sunni jihadism, Hojetiyyist Return-of-the-Mahdi-Cult Shia Jihadism, the vicious Levantine death-cults of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, and Deobandist Talibanic, Lashkar and Jaish Pakistani mujaheddin.

Remember, empirical science is neither conservative nor liberal, even though there are individual scientists inhabiting both wings of the political spectrum. And the only kind of relativism for which empirical science strives is that its theories have a seamless relationship to the relevant experimental and investigatory evidence. In fact, science strives to reduce relativity, by narrowing the array of explanations for any particular phenomenon, ideally to a single one.

741 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 6:35:09pm

re: #726 cracker-crusader

I really get sick and tired of hearing about how faith and science are irreconcilable. Take a course in Analytic Number Theory, or in Algebraic Topology, study quantum field theory, and so on. There really is no basis for rejecting nor accepting God in any science discipline. Period. (I should know, I am a scientist, well OK a mathematician, so hardly dumb and prone to wishful thinking!)

Acceptance of God and the Resurrection is a matter of faith, always will be (duh, that's why it's called "faith", Charles.) I choose to humble myself in suggesting, about the Resurrection, "I wasn't there, I'll have to take it on faith based on the testimony of the witnesses in the Gospels, and if I'm wrong, so be it."

On the other hand, there is much wrong with the hypothesis of evolution. For starters it is not supported by the current scientific research paradigm: REPRODUCIBLE BLOOMIN" RESULTS! Period. If you don't get this, you don't get what the scientific method IS. Sorry, random mutations in fruitflies does not an evolutionary theory make! That's like claiming that cancer proves evolution.

Richard Lenski can reproduce the evolution of e. coli bacteria at will. Evolution is no hypothesis; a hypothesis, by definition, wouldn't be supported by the reams of empirical evidence that have accumulated in the last 150 years - evidence such as the fossil record, and the fruits of genetic sequencing and interspecies comparison, both of genomes in general and of their spliced-in-from-outside artifactual retroviral DNA sequences in particular. Evolution is an empirical fact, and evolutionary theory is, well, scientific theory, like the theories of relativity and universal gravitation are. They organize the various empirical observations within their respective domains by means of a common explanation. And indeed, as Dobhanzky said, nothing in bioscience makes sense in the absence of evolutionary theory.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

In order for me to accept the hypothesis, and elevate it to the status of theory, I'll need to see you start with one species, and end with another. If you can't do that, well you're just talking philosophy, and in that there is no discussion.

You'd have to live a helluva long time to witness the evolution of a species, or its speciation into two or more. These things take many thousands of generations to gradually, incrementally occur. But as I mentioned before, Lenski can show it to you in the case of e. coli. It has been empirically observed, and that fact removes it from the realm of speculative or conjectural philosophy and places it squarely in the empirical science domain.

The fossil record is incomplete. It always will be. Evolution is a fine hypothesis, not one I believe in because I understand something about continuous time Markov Chains. But whatever. But to claim evolution is somehow on a par with General Relativity or Quantum Mechanics is utter bull. Reproducible results, please.

An incomplete fossil record is not an incorrect one.

It's not a matter of belief; one does not believe in knowledge, one comes to know it, by means of an objective and dispassionate perusal of a tsunami of empirical evidence. Markov chains don't apply because the system isn't stochastic; genomes have a high (although not perfect) copying fidelity, grounding the changes in a foundation of continuity, and environmental selection is nonrandom. Lenski's results are laboratory-under-controlled-conditions reproduceable, just as we may compare and contrast different species' sequenced genomes at will.

Or as Ernest Rutherford said:

"The only real science is Physics. All the rest is just stamp-collecting."

Chemists would disagree with Rutherford. and so would a plethora of other disciplines. Don't mistake academic discipline chauvinism for facticity.

742 cracker-crusader  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 6:37:50pm

Yawn, indeed, Mr Secul.

First what I take issue with is the pretense that evolution is verifiable, except after the fact. What you and those of your persuasion are persistently incapable of doing is demonstrating the MECHANISM by which things change. You have failed to provide the cause. You observe the effects, and ascribe a cause (random mutations) which is patently laughable, as anyone with any advanced training in stochastics could tell you.

Listen to this: "Lizards evolving the ability...." That sounds like lizards can choose to evolve themselves. No one here (except a few diehards) disputes that species come and go (Geez, didn't I mention the fossil records?). And I'm sorry, but the mechanism by which species evolve (and there may be several, depending on a great many factors) is, are we ready,.... independent of the concept that the universe was created, by design. Absent random processes, you then expect me to believe that species have been endowed with the magical capability to self-transform, as the need arises, and this presumably by mere chance? I happen to believe it is by design, and this exhibits in itself the notion that our universe is self-aware. But, herein lies my point, we are into the realm of philosophy.

And for what it's worth, Albert Einstein rejected Quantum Mechanics in the Feynman era by saying "God does not play dice". That of course in support of a deterministic universe.

In addition, quasars and pulsars are merely proposals, and we will actually never know for sure what the universe looks like, beyond a tiny sliver of space-time. Our arrogance as a species never ceases to baffle me, as we gaze at a mere trillionth of a trillionth of a nanosecond in the Cosmic day. This is one of the reasons a great many physicists have problems with some of what is being done in modern Cosmology, dismissing it also as philosophy, or at best, pretty cool and funky pure mathematics. Cosmology is also largely unverifiable. And the models keep changing - witness the finding of Calcium (by spectrometry) in the Lymen-Alpha Forest.

In the end what the so-called scientific method does is propose models, and then rigorously test them for failure. This has not been done as regards the proposal of the mechanism by which species evolve, and so the hypothesis of evolution belongs in a class on the Philosophy of Science. Anything else is intellectual dishonesty perpetrated on an unsuspecting and naive public.

743 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 6:48:12pm

re: #728 jonahsand

I never said the site attacks Christians. I said the site attacks "Christian creationists." To the extent attacks on Christian creationists are attacks on religious beliefs that frankly are widespread in Judeo-Christian thought and other faith systems, I think they are counterproductive to the fight against Islam.

In the free marketplace of ideas, no religion or ideology is exempt from criticism; neither do they have a right not to be offended, or a right to invoke their offence as a rationale by means of which to end critial discussion. Even though many of them would dearly and devoutly love to impose such totalitarian thought control.

It is no more counterproductive to the fight against Islam to protect the public high school science education system in order to to strive to ensure that our nations' future bioscientists have empirically scientific rather than religiously dogmatic educations so they can better strengthen our nation in these disciplines, than it is to strive to make the connections between US creationist organizations and their Islamocreationist counterparts more widely known, or to highlight the fascist roots and tendencies of some european political parties that are attempting to align themselves with European and American antijihadists, risking the public rejection of the antijihadist movement in general should such guilty associations be engaged in and then become more widely known, as they most certainly would be.

744 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 7:23:35pm

re: #742 cracker-crusader

Yawn, indeed, Mr Secul.

First what I take issue with is the pretense that evolution is verifiable, except after the fact. What you and those of your persuasion are persistently incapable of doing is demonstrating the MECHANISM by which things change. You have failed to provide the cause. You observe the effects, and ascribe a cause (random mutations) which is patently laughable, as anyone with any advanced training in stochastics could tell you.

The mechanism is that genomes have a high but not perfect copying fidelity, and randomly mutate due to radioactive or chemical interference, among other reasons. There random mutations are confronted with a surrounding environment that NOnrandomly selects which of the mutations will and will not survive and reproduce. The process is not simply chance, as it is determined by the ambient characteristics obtaining in the environment; this fact precludes stochasticism.

Listen to this: "Lizards evolving the ability...." That sounds like lizards can choose to evolve themselves. No one here (except a few diehards) disputes that species come and go (Geez, didn't I mention the fossil records?).

Different species in different geological strata is empirical evidence for evolution. But of course lizards do not manifest evolutionary intention; however, while various mutations can theoretically point to improved functionality in many different ecological directions, in practical terms, the existent environment selects in one direction only - its own - simply by being more hospitable to some mutations than to others.

And I'm sorry, but the mechanism by which species evolve (and there may be several, depending on a great many factors) is, are we ready,.... independent of the concept that the universe was created, by design. Absent random processes, you then expect me to believe that species have been endowed with the magical capability to self-transform, as the need arises, and this presumably by mere chance? I happen to believe it is by design, and this exhibits in itself the notion that our universe is self-aware. But, herein lies my point, we are into the realm of philosophy.

That's right, independent; the evolutionary mechanism that I described, which is NOT pure chance, has nothing to say one way or the other as to whether some Prime Mover binged the Big Bang. Any more than electromagnetism has anything to say about rates of isotopic decay. They're unrelated fields. The process of evolution is empirical, not magical, and the ecological needs that arise (ambient environmental niche conditions) directionally (not by chance or caprice) select for some random mutations and against others.

And for what it's worth, Albert Einstein rejected Quantum Mechanics in the Feynman era by saying "God does not play dice". That of course in support of a deterministic universe.

Feynmann was right about that one, and Einstein was wrong. When and where particle and antiparticle pairs will pop into and out of existence in the quantum foam is in principle determinable only statistically to a degree of error, averaging over a span of spacetime, not precisely for individual occurrences. But Einstein was no theist:

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."

to be continued...

745 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 7:28:58pm

re: #740 Salamantis

It is also an anti-idiotarian site in general.

I think this is right. I would go even further and say that Charles is leading a Rationalist crusade against Islam and all other forces seeking to impose faith over reason in society. However, the site's focus on creationism is new, despite the fact that creationism as an ideology and faux-science has been around since the mid-1900s. What I am trying to understand is why Charles is focusing more on creationism lately, and less on Islamism and Islamic terrorism? It's not like the terrorist threat has waned one iota (see: Mumbai, French dept. store, recent resurgence of terror in Iraq).

My quarrel therefore is with the sheer volume of creationist posts compared with radical Islam posts. I feel like the latter remains the more pressing threat that demands lots more attention than it has been getting recently.

Thanks.

746 Charles  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 7:37:00pm

re: #745 jonahsand

Complete nonsense. In the last 60 days there have been 582 front page articles at LGF, and a grand total of 29 were tagged with "creationism."

The "sheer volume" you're complaining about is vastly slanted in the other direction.

This is a bogus complaint. Find something else to complain about, and if you don't like the posts at LGF you're entitled to a full refund of what you paid to read them.

747 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 7:43:39pm

re: #742 cracker-crusader

In addition, quasars and pulsars are merely proposals, and we will actually never know for sure what the universe looks like, beyond a tiny sliver of space-time. Our arrogance as a species never ceases to baffle me, as we gaze at a mere trillionth of a trillionth of a nanosecond in the Cosmic day. This is one of the reasons a great many physicists have problems with some of what is being done in modern Cosmology, dismissing it also as philosophy, or at best, pretty cool and funky pure mathematics. Cosmology is also largely unverifiable. And the models keep changing - witness the finding of Calcium (by spectrometry) in the Lymen-Alpha Forest.

The quasar and pulsar phenomena may be seen and heard in our visual and radio telescopes. Once again, incomplete does not entail incorrect. Although the position and the momentum of an electron cannot be simultaneously measured with absolute precision, the product of their respective inaccuracies under conditions of optimal possible measurement is precisely determinable, and in principle further precision is impossible. If incomplete were the same as incorrect, Kurt Godel's Incompleteness Theorems could not have framed them as either/or alternatives.

And I expect the footprint of many different elements to be spectroscopically detectable in Lyman-Alpha absorption line complex; nuclear fusion in the superhot and superpressured bowels of stars fuses hydrogen into elements higher on the periodic scale.

In the end what the so-called scientific method does is propose models, and then rigorously test them for failure. This has not been done as regards the proposal of the mechanism by which species evolve, and so the hypothesis of evolution belongs in a class on the Philosophy of Science. Anything else is intellectual dishonesty perpetrated on an unsuspecting and naive public.

This is untrue. Evolutionary theory is one of the most rigorously tested and solidly verified theories in the whole of science. Transitional fossils have been predicted and then found, species have been hypothesized to be more closely or more distantly related and comparative genomics has verified such contentions, and the physical substrate DNA by means of which (along with determining environmental selection) the process proceeds has been isolated, and its sequential analysis has been completed in several species (humans and our closest relatives chimpanzees among them), and is underway in many more. It will continue until the genomes of all species, existent or extinct, for which we can obtain them, is complete. This is no armchair philosophizing, but rigorous empirical science, taking place in authentic laboratories employing genuine technology, and yielding sound, solid and valid empirical results.

748 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 7:50:18pm

re: #746 Charles

Complete nonsense. In the last 60 days there have been 582 front page articles at LGF, and a grand total of 29 were tagged with "creationism."

The "sheer volume" you're complaining about is vastly slanted in the other direction.

Not quite, because only 65 within that same time frame were tagged with "terrorism." Again the quarrel is with marginal emphasis. That is, recently, the 'growth rate' of creationism posts has increased, whereas the 'growth rate' of terrorism posts has decreased.

749 jaunte  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:01:29pm

re: #748 jonahsand

I take it you're a "steady-state" kind of guy.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

750 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:13:27pm

re: #749 jaunte

I take it you're a "steady-state" kind of guy.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

This has nothing to do with my personality. It has more to do with this site's "evolution" (no pun intended) over the last year or so. What I am looking for is acknowledgment that indeed the site's focus is drifting. The question at that stage becomes: to what end?

751 jaunte  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:18:24pm

re: #750 jonahsand

I think that question has been answered several times by the owner of the site: he will post about the subjects that interest him. If you would like a different mix of stories and posts, you are free to create your own site.

752 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:20:16pm

re: #748 jonahsand

Not quite, because only 65 within that same time frame were tagged with "terrorism." Again the quarrel is with marginal emphasis. That is, recently, the 'growth rate' of creationism posts has increased, whereas the 'growth rate' of terrorism posts has decreased.

The growth rate of posts on creationism, science education and evolutionary theory has increased from zero simply because it is an area that Charles had not been previously addressing at all, but decided to take on, for good and solid anti-idiotarian reasons. The same goes with his increase from zero on posts about the eurofascist roots of various european political parties endeavoring to piggyback to power on antijihadist movement credibility.

If there are marginally fewer posts on the GWOT than before, this could simply be because the US has prevailed so spectacularly lately in Bin Laden's self-described central Al Qaedan theater, Iraq. And that is undeniably a GOOD thing. As far as jihadi terror attacks go, less available news is most definitely better news.

753 Salamantis  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:25:34pm

re: #750 jonahsand

This has nothing to do with my personality. It has more to do with this site's "evolution" (no pun intended) over the last year or so. What I am looking for is acknowledgment that indeed the site's focus is drifting. The question at that stage becomes: to what end?

The site's focus is where it has always been; holding the malevolent, the totalitarian, the imperialist, the hegemonic, the supremacist, and various other idiotarians to list account, and informing list members and visitors of their sundry shenanigans. Different mixes of them show up in the world, and thus in here, at different times. The site focus does not drift; the available and relevant news does.

754 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:30:07pm

re: #752 Salamantis

News from Iraq is undoubtedly good. Terrorism unfortunately is not so confined. Terrorism is on the march in South Asia and Afghanistan, just as it was before 9/11. Terrorism continues to provide more than enough grist for other GWOT blog mills.

I take jaunte's post above, however. This is indeed Charles' personal blog. He takes it wherever he wishes. I am merely registering my surprise that he has been taking it in this particular direction. I think we've all been readjusting to the shift.

755 Charles  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:30:10pm

re: #750 jonahsand

This has nothing to do with my personality. It has more to do with this site's "evolution" (no pun intended) over the last year or so. What I am looking for is acknowledgment that indeed the site's focus is drifting. The question at that stage becomes: to what end?

Which of course makes me curious: are you a creationist yourself, 'jonashand'?

756 jaunte  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:34:52pm

re: #754 jonahsand

Adding to the point that it's Charles' blog, and he can post whatever he likes:

He is also remarkably generous with his bandwidth, in that any of the registered posters can discuss what they like on comment threads, or post links to the stories they think are important, and push them. This is probably a more effective way to move the discussion to topics you prefer than to complain that those stories aren't getting enough attention.

757 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:53:04pm

re: #755 Charles

I am not a creationist. Like most rational people I believe in the theory of evolution. Creationists are fairly absurd and harmless people -- attempts to impose creationism in public schools have seriously been on the wane (in the US) since the 1980/90s. As such, they are a pretty easy target, intellectually and morally. I feel like engaging them and 'exposing' them so consistently is beneath you, honestly.

You have a better and more worthy opponent in global Islamic terrorism.

758 Charles  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 8:58:57pm

re: #757 jonahsand

I feel like engaging them and 'exposing' them so consistently is beneath you, honestly.

I'll have to find a way to carry on despite your disappointment. It won't be easy, but somehow I'll manage.

759 Lynn B.  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:10:55pm

re: #745 jonahsand

I think this is right. I would go even further and say that Charles is leading a Rationalist crusade against Islam and all other forces seeking to impose faith over reason in society. However, the site's focus on creationism is new, despite the fact that creationism as an ideology and faux-science has been around since the mid-1900s. What I am trying to understand is why Charles is focusing more on creationism lately, and less on Islamism and Islamic terrorism? It's not like the terrorist threat has waned one iota (see: Mumbai, French dept. store, recent resurgence of terror in Iraq).

My quarrel therefore is with the sheer volume of creationist posts compared with radical Islam posts. I feel like the latter remains the more pressing threat that demands lots more attention than it has been getting recently.

Thanks.

And yet, you elected to register as a member of this site only three days ago.

One has to wonder, given your disillusionment with its content, why you chose to do that.

/actually, it's pretty obvious...

760 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:13:51pm

re: #759 Lynn B.

I believe in reform from within. HTH.

761 Sharmuta  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:19:13pm

re: #760 jonahsand

So you're here for an intervention and suggesting what- rehab?

762 Charles  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:19:33pm

re: #760 jonahsand

Is this your first LGF account, or have you previously registered under another name?

763 Lynn B.  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:21:30pm

re: #757 jonahsand

I am not a creationist. Like most rational people I believe in the theory of evolution. Creationists are fairly absurd and harmless people -- attempts to impose creationism in public schools have seriously been on the wane (in the US) since the 1980/90s. As such, they are a pretty easy target, intellectually and morally. I feel like engaging them and 'exposing' them so consistently is beneath you, honestly.

You have a better and more worthy opponent in global Islamic terrorism.

If you honestly think that attempts to impose creationism in public schools have been "on the wane" in the US, you obviously haven't been paying attention. And

re: #760 jonahsand

I believe in reform from within. HTH.

No, I don't need help identifying you as a troll. Thanks anyway.

764 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:24:19pm

re: #762 Charles

...No, my first. Why is this feeling more and more like an interrogation.

765 Lynn B.  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:34:21pm

re: #764 jonahsand

...No, my first. Why is this feeling more and more like an interrogation.

I don't know why I'm wasting my time but ...

Nine of your first ten comments on this site have been dedicated to attacking your host and your fellow guests. In the real world, that would have gotten you kicked to the curb in a NY minute. So either you're so socially inept that you fail to realize that lifting your leg (or squatting) isn't the best way to make friends and influence people or you're a troll.

I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

766 Sharmuta  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:35:31pm

re: #764 jonahsand

So- why is it when Charles starts poking around some of the connections between creationists and islamists, you don't care? Isn't that part of the islamists campaign? Shouldn't we be concerned about that?

767 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:42:15pm

re: #765 Lynn B.

I live in NY. Free and contentious debate is what NY is all about. I've never known a life free from argument. Roll with the punches a bit, why don't ya?

After all, it takes two (or more) to debate (notwithstanding me, myself, I situations /SARCTAG). If you are gonna kick everyone out who disagrees with you, you can never have a debate. Is that what you want?

768 jaunte  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:43:54pm

re: #767 jonahsand

You complain that Charles isn't doing something you are completely free to do, both here and elsewhere.

769 jonahsand  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:45:40pm

re: #766 Sharmuta

Absolutely. Links between Islamists and Christians, no matter how small, ought to be exposed. Islamists can exploit common ground over creationism to push for more concessions and partnerships with Christians. We should be vigilant against that possibility.

This particular post didn't have much to do with Islamism or terrorism, however.

770 Thanos  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:50:14pm

re: #769 jonahsand

But it does have everything to say on how Rick Warren seems to be on a path from apolitcal to political, from religious to irreligious does it not?

Have you seen what Penn Jillette had to say the other day about belief and proselytization?

If Warren believes what was there was truth, then why did he take it down? Is it not a Pastor's job to proselytize the truth he sees?

771 Sharmuta  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 9:58:22pm

re: #769 jonahsand

Absolutely. Links between Islamists and Christians, no matter how small, ought to be exposed. Islamists can exploit common ground over creationism to push for more concessions and partnerships with Christians. We should be vigilant against that possibility.

This particular post didn't have much to do with Islamism or terrorism, however.

You're failing to see the larger picture. Is that intentional?

772 Thanos  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 10:06:00pm

On the other hand maybe he just realized that he was jeopardizing the Oprah endorsement for his next book.

773 NoWhereAlaska  Tue, Dec 23, 2008 11:12:29pm

Well Jonahsand sure has gotten some attention tonight. I assume that is what he wanted. He has had his 15 minutes of Lizard World Infamy. Yet, Charles is amazingly tolerant. Good night all.

774 Charles  Wed, Dec 24, 2008 8:27:50am

Well, my tolerance is over this morning.

To 'jonahsand': you do not have the right to dictate what sort of content appears on LGF, and your account is blocked because even after numerous warnings you insisted on whining about it.

This will give you more time to start your own blog where you can control what is posted.

775 Yashmak  Wed, Dec 24, 2008 9:37:37am

re: #754 jonahsand


I take jaunte's post above, however. This is indeed Charles' personal blog. He takes it wherever he wishes. I am merely registering my surprise that he has been taking it in this particular direction. I think we've all been readjusting to the shift.

Looks like you have some more adjusting to do, now that you've been blocked. Hope you're up to it after the all-of-4-days of adjusting you've been through already.

776 Charles  Wed, Dec 24, 2008 11:05:51am

By the way, several people wrote in this thread that the Saddleback Church may have been working on that page, or had some other reason for deleting it.

But it's been blank for several days now, and it only disappeared after gay rights groups started circulating links to show the statements on homosexuality. I'm sure that is the main reason they yanked it offline, and not the creationism (which I find equally troubling).

It's all about marketing.

777 Mr Secul  Wed, Dec 24, 2008 12:28:48pm

re: #742 cracker-crusader

First what I take issue with is the pretense that evolution is verifiable, except after the fact.

I'm not sure what you meant there. Are you saying that it is impossible to make predictions using evolutionary theory?

What you and those of your persuasion are persistently incapable of doing is demonstrating the MECHANISM by which things change. You have failed to provide the cause. You observe the effects, and ascribe a cause (random mutations) which is patently laughable, as anyone with any advanced training in stochastic could tell you.

You have either misunderstood or you are being disingenuous.

My money is on disingenuous.

You consistently omit natural selection. Which is odd considering that it is always mentioned as part of the theory of evolution. Its been there for around 150 years. Did you miss it?

Do you ignore it because you don't believe that it can work? Do you ignore it because you don't understand it? Or are you ignoring it because you are trying to demolish a straw man?

Which is it?

you then expect me to believe that species have been endowed with the magical capability to self-transform, as the need arises, and this presumably by mere chance?

Straw man.

In addition, quasars and pulsars are merely proposals, and we will actually never know for sure what the universe looks like, beyond a tiny sliver of space-time.

I mentioned quasars as an example of something that is observable but not reproducible. We can't make them on demand.

In the end what the so-called scientific method does is propose models, and then rigorously test them for failure. This has not been done as regards the proposal of the mechanism by which species evolve, and so the hypothesis of evolution belongs in a class on the Philosophy of Science. Anything else is intellectual dishonesty perpetrated on an unsuspecting and naive public.

We can see the mechanisms in operation. We can measure the rates of copying errors, observe crossover in meiosis, we can see the genes involved in the acquisition of new traits. The actual genes, and we can see the actual nucleotides that change. We can compare the ratios of synonymous to non-synonymous base changes and see that natural selection weeds out non-synonymous changes. We can measure the changes of frequencies of traits within a population as it undergoes selection pressure.

Lenski can show which generation first acquired the mutation that enabled the eventual acquisition of citrate metabolism. I don't know if he has isolated the actual nucleotides that have changed yet but its only a matter of time.

We see the degradation of pseudo-genes once they become inactive.

Are you really saying that no tests of any kind have ever been performed on evolutionary theory? Did Google come up with nothing for you?

What about a quick search for tests of evolutionary theory on pubmed? You will have to enter the search text yourself.