shrieking, deranged lunatic

That's a compliment.

Go To San Francisco, they love public flogging. Zombie will shoot it.

She's just totally lost her mind Charles. Well, what mind she had, anyway.

“Somebody must take a chance. The monkeys who did became men, and the monkeys who didn't are still jumping around in trees making faces at the monkeys who did.”
-- Lincoln Steffens

OMFG!

Another reason why I don't read blogs with the exception of LGF. There sure are a lot of loonies out there.

Yawn.

I do wish she would just do the world a favor and STFU!

Then again if by "flogged" she means "highly promoted" (as in the synonym for "advertised") I agree wholeheartedly.

Otherwise she should just FOAD.

She's jess upset that Kate over at SDA is kicking her butt in the weblog awards ;)

Whenever the shrieking masses of collectivists call for me to be subject to great bodily harm and/or death at the hands of the mob, I always enjoy reminding them of my cowardly practice of carrying rather capable firearms concealed on my person.

I would consider it an honor to bring about such vitriol from a shrieking moonbat.

as I don't have the required PPE at the ready to visit that site, does it still say dear Charles "whould be flogged" in public?

She Belangs, She Belangs! /william hung.

re: #5 Lynn B. Really. But ya know it's not all BAD - at least she's not whipping up her supporter to vote over and over and over again at those stupid web blog awards!

Flogging must not be considered torture by the Left...at least she didn't suggest you be waterboarded Charles, that would be truly inhumane.

re: #9 Jim708
LOL! GMTA (see my 13!)!

I think Pam has a Junior high crush on Charles. Don't become a stalker, Pam.

Is Pam hot? Does anyone know?

re: #16 DistantThunder

I think Pam has a Junior high crush on Charles. Don't become a stalker, Pam.

Heh- "Hell hath no fury.." eh?

re: #11 ArmyWife
Well she refers to him as "Chuck" and to think that she used to call him her "BlogFather" for his assistance in getting Atlas Shrugs up and running!

re: #10 ArdentCapitalist

Whenever the shrieking masses of collectivists call for me to be subject to great bodily harm and/or death at the hands of the mob, I always enjoy reminding them of my cowardly practice of carrying rather capable firearms concealed on my person.

I would consider it an honor to bring about such vitriol from a shrieking moonbat.

I wouldn't call her a moonbat.

re: #17 Jetpilot1101

Is Pam hot? Does anyone know?

She's pretty.

re: #19 realwest

Well she refers to him as "Chuck" and to think that she used to call him her "BlogFather" for his assistance in getting Atlas Shrugs up and running!

Serpent's tooth.

re: #16 DistantThunder

I think Pam has a Junior high crush on Charles. Don't become a stalker, Pam.

Just like Olby's man-crush on O'Reilly. The envy eats away at them from within.

I don't go to Atlas Barfs any more, but this time I did check the post.
At least she didn't mispell "publicly".

/both "L's" ... Charles, you should be grateful.

re: #17 Jetpilot1101
If you mean "hot" as in "hot looking" I don't know - take a look at any of her threads where she's at some kinda event featuring people who actually count - she's in everyone of the photos she posts, so you can judge for yourself!

re: #20 MandyManners

I wouldn't call her a moonbat.

Vindictive, maybe.

re: #17 Jetpilot1101

Is Pam hot? Does anyone know?

Yeah, but so are a lot of chicks that would drive you nuts in about 30 seconds - or less.

I think Pamela is a major hottie. She can flog me anytime. Preferably in private though. :)

OT: Obama is on ABC's Stephanopoulis show right now mostly just running his mouth and looking tanned, rested, and ready, but at least he (Obama) has *finally* offered Israel some mild support this morning, perhaps for the first time.

re: #20 MandyManners

I wouldn't call her a moonbat.

She's not a moonbat, she is a "useful idiot". CAIR and the rest of the jihadi movement can point to her and tar honest anti-jihadi people as Nazis.

re: #22 MandyManners
"Serpent's tooth" Uh, what? (sorry, need more coffee!)

I've been doing a little thinking, and I realized something:

The way I figure it, most people don't start paying attention to world events much before the age of 13 or 14. They might start thinking of themselves as potential voters about the age of 16, and cannot vote before the age of 18. So, let's think about some of the historical events that had the potential to shape the opinions of people in a more conservative direction, especially if you actually witnessed these events yourself, instead of having to rely on the accounts from biased media and historians.

If you were under the age of 50 in 2008, you could not have lived to regret voting for Jimmy Carter.If you were under the age of 41, you may not have remembered much about the Carter years at all, except for going to see Star Wars with your parents.

It was those 46-year-olds who watched the Church Committees neuter the CIA, then watched America's enemies respond by feeling themselves free to take over other countries who voted for Reagan in 1980.

If you were 35 or 36 years old or older in 2008, you would remember the Achille Lauro, preceded by years and years of PLO hijackings of airliners. If you were 30, you would remember the collapse of the USSR, and the campaign to rehabilitate the image of the Palestinians in anticipation of the Oslo Accords the 28-year-olds may remember.

You would have had to be 34 in 2008 to have regretted voting for Bill Clinton in 1992. If you were younger than 24 in 2008, it would have been inappropriate to discuss the Monica Lewinsky incident, and thus the whys and wherefores of the Clinton impeachment as it was happening.

To anyone younger than 30, the Cold War was something to read about in a history book commissioned by NEA members and written by a history professor who spent his or her spare time agitating for CISPES and divestment from South Africa.

A 19-year old's political awareness was shaped almost entirely by the election of George W Bush in 2000, and the subsequent leftist campaign against him.

And this is why Obama won in 2008.

I'm still shocked that she veered off into where ever she is these days. I used to email with her years ago and she was so sweet and kind. Very strange transformation.

She really should address that drinking problem.

re: #20 MandyManners

I wouldn't call her a moonbat.

Charles and her seem to share the same mission to expose the left and defend Israel but unfortunately, it seems that she is willing to turn a blind eye to some pretty bad supremacist stuff in order to do it. I commend Charles on exposing the nationalists over there for what they are and not joining their side just because there is a common enemy. Looks like Pam has a log in her eye.

Pamela Geller is breaking the law:

TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I--CRIMES

CHAPTER 19--CONSPIRACY

Sec. 373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence

(a) Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct
constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of physical force against property or against the person
of another in violation of the laws of the United States, and under
circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands,
induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage
in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum
term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more
than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the
crime solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by
life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty
years.

I knew there was a reason I never read her website, this just vindicates my decision.

re: #30 CIA Reject
BINGO!

re: #17 Jetpilot1101

she believes she is.

re: #28 lionfromzion

I think Pamela is a major hottie. She can flog me anytime. Preferably in private though. :)

You must've read my #24.
(-:

re: #34 JammieWearingFool Good morning Jammie!
Uh, what drinking problem?!
/

re: #6 Jetpilot1101

Another reason why I don't read blogs with the exception of LGF. There sure are a lot of loonies out there.

I agree..I came over here from Just one Minute Blog.. Just the coolest smartest bloggers around.. That's where i got started...I still go back and say I love you guys...
Also I saw a sundance movie called blog wars 2 about firedoglake blog..With Jane hammier and learned about bloggering during the Scotter trial..Our politics don't match

re: #33 Teacake!

I'm still shocked that she veered off into where ever she is these days. I used to email with her years ago and she was so sweet and kind. Very strange transformation.

I think she's star-struck and desperately wants to be in the new "in" crowd.

Chemical weapons, Israel set up Hamas. This is nothing but pure propaganda

On-topic for once,

Why are we being subjected to the perverted fantasies of Pam Geller? Worse yet, what did Charles do to be the target of Pam Geller's sadomasochistic screed?

re: #31 realwest

"Serpent's tooth" Uh, what? (sorry, need more coffee!)

Ref:

"Sharper than a serpent's tooth is a thankless child ..."

Or something like that.

re: #29 itellu3times

OT: Obama is on ABC's Stephanopoulis show right now mostly just running his mouth and looking tanned, rested, and ready, but at least he (Obama) has *finally* offered Israel some mild support this morning, perhaps for the first time.

..........me thinks he is smoking again, and heavily. too.

re: #20 MandyManners

I wouldn't call her a moonbat.

Then what exactly would you call her?

re: #31 realwest

"Serpent's tooth" Uh, what? (sorry, need more coffee!)

Reference to King Lear.

re: #26 Spiny Norman

Vindictive, maybe.

And, short-sighted. Petty, too.

re: #35 Jetpilot1101

Charles and her seem to share the same mission to expose the left and defend Israel but unfortunately, it seems that she is willing to turn a blind eye to some pretty bad supremacist stuff in order to do it. I commend Charles on exposing the nationalists over there for what they are and not joining their side just because there is a common enemy. Looks like Pam has a log in her eye.

Sounds like most politicians and Mactors in LA
/every life is precious except the unborn

re: #30 CIA Reject

She's not a moonbat, she is a "useful idiot". CAIR and the rest of the jihadi movement can point to her and tar honest anti-jihadi people as Nazis.

Precisely.

re: #32 RememberSekhmet?

Very thought provoking- excellent analysis!

re: #45 RememberSekhmet?

On-topic for once,

Why are we being subjected to the perverted fantasies of Pam Geller? Worse yet, what did Charles do to be the target of Pam Geller's sadomasochistic screed?

I think that he pointed out her association with racists.

re: #47 smokefire

..........me thinks he is smoking again, and heavily. too.

Maybe he should take up a pipe.

re: #43 Spiny Norman

I think she's star-struck and desperately wants to be in the new "in" crowd.

and I think you are exactly right...she hasn't watched where she stepped, lost focus and seems envious now

re: #35 Jetpilot1101

Charles and her seem to share the same mission to expose the left and defend Israel but unfortunately, it seems that she is willing to turn a blind eye to some pretty bad supremacist stuff in order to do it. I commend Charles on exposing the nationalists over there for what they are and not joining their side just because there is a common enemy. Looks like Pam has a log in her eye.

A whole forest.

re: #35 Jetpilot1101
I have to disagree - NO ONE WHO TRULY SUPPORTS ISRAEL could make common league with Fascists of any stripe.
And there are some of the European brand who only support the State of Israel so they'll be someplace to deport European Jews to when (God forbid) they come to power.

re: #23 rwmofo

Just like Olby's man-crush on O'Reilly. The envy eats away at them from within.

Olby just reeks of "1 paycheck from homeless."

Madness.

re: #48 ArdentCapitalist

Then what exactly would you call her?

A willfully blind asshole.

re: #41 realwest

Good morning Jammie!
Uh, what drinking problem?!
/

Hey, bud, how are you?

I recall one time a couple years ago on here she was talking about how much wine she was consuming and posted a totally incoherent comment. When I suggested she put down the wine glass she told me to go eff myself.

re: #58 realwest

I have to disagree - NO ONE WHO TRULY SUPPORTS ISRAEL could make common league with Fascists of any stripe.
And there are some of the European brand who only support the State of Israel so they'll be someplace to deport European Jews to when (God forbid) they come to power.

That's a valid point. Her support may be completely opportunistic.

I'm muting NanaCam. This guy is a tool of Hamas from the West Bank.

re: #29 itellu3times

OT: Obama is on ABC's Stephanopoulis show right now mostly just running his mouth and looking tanned, rested, and ready, but at least he (Obama) has *finally* offered Israel some mild support this morning, perhaps for the first time.

Our Beta-male, metro sexual, hen-pecked, p-whipped president - and Putin just declared it's the beginning of a new Ice Age - Round One.........

re: #55 itellu3times

Maybe he should take up a pipe.

.................and what kind of pipe would that be?

Maybe she is coming on to you.

re: #62 JammieWearingFool

The usually cogent response, huh? Utter class, that one.

Oh great, Pamela Geller. Who lifted up Dorothy's house and let her out from under?

re: #43 Spiny Norman

I think she's star-struck and desperately wants to be in the new "in" crowd.

Spot on!

Maybe Pamela is in heat or something.

/

re: #64 MandyManners

I'm muting NanaCam. This guy is a tool of Hamas from the West Bank.

He's gone now.

My take is that she and RS are primarily interested in installing themselves as King and Queen of a movement that they (and only they) have invented. There are a lot of good people doing good things in the name of counterjihad (and have been for years), but to get in their particular club you have to be pure on their terms.

Sorry your majesty. I'm good here at LGF. Really. Thanks for asking.

re: #62 JammieWearingFool

Hey, bud, how are you?

I recall one time a couple years ago on here she was talking about how much wine she was consuming and posted a totally incoherent comment. When I suggested she put down the wine glass she told me to go eff myself.

Blogging while blotto!

Yes Pamela is hot...but bless her heart, her NY upbringing has shaped an over-the-top classic Jewish American Princess voice which will keep her from gaining a national audience.

re: #45 RememberSekhmet? Two years or so ago there was a "counter-jihadist" conference in Brussels. Charles posted that the good guy counter-jihadist's needed to be careful to not allow themselves to be used to burnish the image of the White Nationalists/Neo-Nazi's in Europe who also attended the conference. THAT'S ALL CHARLES SAID: "BE CAREFUL". Pamela - who could easily have contacted Charles privately, immediately posted a full tilt boogie attack on Charles and went so far as to say Charles was in league with CAIR!
It went downhill from there.

re: #49 MandyManners

Reference to King Lear.

And it made an appearance in one of my very favorite X-Files.

re: #46 Lynn B.
Ah, thank you kindly!

"Stay as classycrass as you are, Pamela!"

Charles, ignore her, she isn't worth it.

re: #72 reine.de.tout

He's gone now.

Thanks! Now I can listen to the drones.

(((Lizard asshat)))

re: #73 Bloodnok

My take is that she and RS are primarily interested in installing themselves as King and Queen of a movement that they (and only they) have invented. There are a lot of good people doing good things in the name of counterjihad (and have been for years), but to get in their particular club you have to be pure on their terms.

Sorry your majesty. I'm good here at LGF. Really. Thanks for asking.

Just so!
You said precisely what I felt for some time, but couldn't put into words as well as you have done.
Thanks.

Charles just has to stop wear that great cologne. It's driving Pam wild.

(Invention idea: A perfume/cologne that only attracts people of your own political ideology while repelling all others.)

re: #35 Jetpilot1101

Charles and her seem to share the same mission to expose the left and defend Israel but unfortunately, it seems that she is willing to turn a blind eye to some pretty bad supremacist stuff in order to do it. I commend Charles on exposing the nationalists over there for what they are and not joining their side just because there is a common enemy. Looks like Pam has a log in her eye.

Your comment reminds me of an article on Politico on Bill Cosby.

I applaud half the message. (The sound of one hand clapping)

The fact that PG thinks Charles caused a "lost year" single handily speaks volumes. She clearly understands that Charles and his views usurp the views of the crazy pack she is running with and as she has no rational way to respond, she is resorting to kindergarten temper tantrums. To which I say "You Go, Head Honco!"

............question here, Pamela, if Europe gets rid of their Muslim problem, WHO do you think they will go after next...............hmmmm?

re: #77 Lynn B.

And it made an appearance in one of my very favorite X-Files.

For a while, whenever I read a "shaddup Sully" post, I thought it was a reference to Scully.

re: #75 red satellite

Yes Pamela is hot...but bless her heart, her NY upbringing has shaped an over-the-top classic Jewish American Princess voice which will keep her from gaining a national audience.

That voice...someone should tell her.

re: #64 MandyManners

I'm muting NanaCam. This guy is a tool of Hamas from the West Bank.

Of course Brown Shirt Guy is a tool. "Ramattan" is a propaganda outlet.

re: #43 Spiny Norman

I think she's star-struck and desperately wants to be in the new "in" crowd.

Yes. As RW mentioned upthread she posts lotsa pictures to prove to the world how popular she is.

re: #62 JammieWearingFool

Hey, bud, how are you?

I recall one time a couple years ago on here she was talking about how much wine she was consuming and posted a totally incoherent comment. When I suggested she put down the wine glass she told me to go eff myself.

Posting one-handed while plastered? Well, at least she has some talent...
///////////////////////

So, reading the posting about the 'great works' of the counter jihad movement at Geller's site, we find this substance: in total, Vlaams Belang:

- voted against a parliament resolution condemning the "disproportionate" violence of Israel in Gaza
- called for a special meeting of Antwerp city council to discuss riots and demonstration
- complained to the mayor that nothing was done

1. Are these considered important anti-jihad efforts?
2. In what way were Vlaams Belang hampered in these minor efforts by LGF

re: #66 smokefire

.................and what kind of pipe would that be?

Seems appropriate.

Really wounded kids on NanaCam.

Did anyone see Brit's interview with 41 & 43 this morning? I thought it was cool how 41 responded to Brit's question concerning why they didn't fight back against many criticisms. 41 was clear that he saw no reason to lower himself and "carp" about the left (unlike Carter & Clinton). Clearly 43 got the message or figured it out on his own. I felt that this illustrated how they were above the petty, teenage mentality of Clinton & Carter.

There were times, however, when I wish that 43 had whacked the MSM across the chops in some of the press conferences.

Get the camera out of that kid's face!

re: #74 MandyManners

Blogging while blotto!

I've done that myself, but at least I usually wind up posting something funny.

Stephanopoulis pressing Obama to name a 9/11 prosecutor to investigate the crimes of the Bush administration, Obama to his credit pushing it away, Stephanopoulis pressing the question at least three times.

Now they're talking dog ...

Country 'n western wisdom.

re: #32 RememberSekhmet?

I've been doing a little thinking, and I realized something:

The way I figure it, most people don't start paying attention to world events much before the age of 13 or 14. They might start thinking of themselves as potential voters about the age of 16, and cannot vote before the age of 18. So, let's think about some of the historical events that had the potential to shape the opinions of people in a more conservative direction, especially if you actually witnessed these events yourself, instead of having to rely on the accounts from biased media and historians.

If you were under the age of 50 in 2008, you could not have lived to regret voting for Jimmy Carter.If you were under the age of 41, you may not have remembered much about the Carter years at all, except for going to see Star Wars with your parents.

It was those 46-year-olds who watched the Church Committees neuter the CIA, then watched America's enemies respond by feeling themselves free to take over other countries who voted for Reagan in 1980.

If you were 35 or 36 years old or older in 2008, you would remember the Achille Lauro, preceded by years and years of PLO hijackings of airliners. If you were 30, you would remember the collapse of the USSR, and the campaign to rehabilitate the image of the Palestinians in anticipation of the Oslo Accords the 28-year-olds may remember.

You would have had to be 34 in 2008 to have regretted voting for Bill Clinton in 1992. If you were younger than 24 in 2008, it would have been inappropriate to discuss the Monica Lewinsky incident, and thus the whys and wherefores of the Clinton impeachment as it was happening.

To anyone younger than 30, the Cold War was something to read about in a history book commissioned by NEA members and written by a history professor who spent his or her spare time agitating for CISPES and divestment from South Africa.

A 19-year old's political awareness was shaped almost entirely by the election of George W Bush in 2000, and the subsequent leftist campaign against him.

And this is why Obama won in 2008.

Great points. I'd almost agree fully except a lot of adults, not just wide-eyed youth voted for this HopeNchange. I believe human beings simply do not have any collective memory and are simply stuck on repeat.

OI - little round-up of Hamas-sayings here:
[Link: elderofziyon.blogspot.com...]

re: #32 RememberSekhmet?

I'm 38, and I remember my parents on election day 1976, talking about how bad it was that Carter was elected.

re: #62 JammieWearingFool Ah, that's what I thought you meant. Had a phone call with her right after her first blog was up, telling her it wasn't perhaps the brightest thing she could do to post her real, full name, and phone number (and, iirc, the names of her kids). She thanked me for the warning and in a long conversation praised Charles for his inspiration and all. I could hear ice-cubes tinkling in a glass when she was talking to me and thought it was a soft drink or something - 45 minutes later I couldn't understand a word she was slurring.
FAIR NOTICE: I am a non-drinking alcoholic and am sensitive to those sorts of things.

She's an embarrassment.

And those rambling, sometimes drunken, videos that she posts on Youtube are proof that she is a borderline nutcase.

Off topic, Maxine Waters is now on with David Gregory.
She is magnificent. If coherent thougts were ammunition, Maxine has a clip full of blanks. I love it when she expresses her opinion, so entertaining.

re: #43 Spiny Norman

I think she's star-struck and desperately wants to be in the new "in" crowd.

Good observation. Also, the sweeps are on with the blogaward voting and she's using Charles to drum up votes.

re: #96 rwmofo

Did anyone see Brit's interview with 41 & 43 this morning? I thought it was cool how 41 responded to Brit's question concerning why they didn't fight back against many criticisms. 41 was clear that he saw no reason to lower himself and "carp" about the left (unlike Carter & Clinton). Clearly 43 got the message or figured it out on his own. I felt that this illustrated how they were above the petty, teenage mentality of Clinton & Carter.

There were times, however, when I wish that 43 had whacked the MSM across the chops in some of the press conferences.

The problem is that in the minds of the average person, the left became more valid because they were louder, and made their point relentlessly. We were fighting a propaganda war with the lefties, and there were holes in the lines - Pres. Bush was MIA.

re: #84 DistantThunder

Charles just has to stop wear that great cologne. It's driving Pam wild.

(Invention idea: A perfume/cologne that only attracts people of your own political ideology while repelling all others.)

I'd buy some of that.

re: #93 jaunte

So, reading the posting about the 'great works' of the counter jihad movement at Geller's site, we find this substance: in total, Vlaams Belang:

- voted against a parliament resolution condemning the "disproportionate" violence of Israel in Gaza
- called for a special meeting of Antwerp city council to discuss riots and demonstration
- complained to the mayor that nothing was done

1. Are these considered important anti-jihad efforts?
2. In what way were Vlaams Belang hampered in these minor efforts by LGF

it's all about the attitude...what little there is, is someones solid and irrefutable principle...must drive them nuts

Do we have any word on when -- or if, and HOW -- Paul Martin will make an appearance?

I just skimmed down the front page, to see if he threw something in (today) at the end of yesterday's posts. Nada.

re: #90 Spiny Norman

Of course Brown Shirt Guy is a tool. "Ramattan" is a propaganda outlet.

I just wondered what he had to say.

re: #98 JammieWearingFool

I've done that myself, but at least I usually wind up posting something funny.

I love reading your blog, BTW. You have a sense of humor many folks can appreciate. Pamela lacks the ability to amuse, sober or not.

re: #96 rwmofo

Did anyone see Brit's interview with 41 & 43 this morning? I thought it was cool how 41 responded to Brit's question concerning why they didn't fight back against many criticisms. 41 was clear that he saw no reason to lower himself and "carp" about the left (unlike Carter & Clinton). Clearly 43 got the message or figured it out on his own. I felt that this illustrated how they were above the petty, teenage mentality of Clinton & Carter.

There were times, however, when I wish that 43 had whacked the MSM across the chops in some of the press conferences.

Yes, Bush43 followed some of Dad's leads on not responding to criticism, and this has been his greatest shortcoming by far.

The polite way to respond to criticism is not to respond to it directly, but to tell your own story, "set the narrative" yourself. Was Bush43 the taciturn cowboy or the elitist trilateralist like Bush41? Either way, he wasted the bully pulpit for almost his entire time in office.

re: #98 JammieWearingFool

I've done that myself, but at least I usually wind up posting something funny.

I don't think you have a mean bone in your body.

re: #113 rightymouse

I love reading your blog, BTW. You have a sense of humor many folks can appreciate. Pamela lacks the ability to amuse, sober or not.

I laugh at her, but never with her.

re: #105 Ringo the Gringo

She's an embarrassment.

And those rambling, sometimes drunken, videos that she posts on Youtube are proof that she is a borderline nutcase.

Touch of narcissism?

re: #97 MandyManners

Get the camera out of that kid's face!

Lordy, that girl's hair is showing!

Real babe on NanaCam.

re: #111 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Do we have any word on when -- or if, and HOW -- Paul Martin will make an appearance?

He's gathering his brain trust and downing a bottle of Bushmills at this very moment, in preparation.
/or not

re: #105 Ringo the Gringo

She's an embarrassment.

And those rambling, sometimes drunken, videos that she posts on Youtube are proof that she is a borderline nutcase.

I think she's waaaaaaay past "borderline."

re: #118 reine.de.tout

Lordy, that girl's hair is showing!

Why was it more important to stick that camera in that kid's face than wash his lips?!

Yes, that was a rhetorical question.

re: #80 Ayatollah Ghilmeini
I'd ordinarily agree with you, but there is a personal history of Charles helping her out with her setting up and running her blog - I sense betrayal in what she says and wouldn't be surprised if Charles didn't feel the same way.
Some things just can't go unanswered.

re: #101 unrealizedviewpoint

Great points. I'd almost agree fully except a lot of adults, not just wide-eyed youth voted for this HopeNchange. I believe human beings simply do not have any collective memory and are simply stuck on repeat.

Most of those people also voted for Jimmy Carter.
Discussing and/or debating with those people is exactly the same experience as a conversation with a troofer.

re: #111 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Do we have any word on when -- or if, and HOW -- Paul Martin will make an appearance?

I just skimmed down the front page, to see if he threw something in (today) at the end of yesterday's posts. Nada.

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

re: #105 Ringo the Gringo

She's an embarrassment.

And those rambling, sometimes drunken, videos that she posts on Youtube are proof that she is a borderline nutcase.

Strike the word "borderline", she is a complete nut.

Oh goody a Troofer thread ----------->

I'm all for public flogging Charles!
one time for standing with our friends Israel.
one time for not sleeping with Nazi's to fight muslims
one time for not caving to PC speak
one time for being totally pure science no matter where it leads us
one time for believing there is truth..somewere..but it is there
one time for not suffering fools
/my arm is tired

re: #105 Ringo the Gringo

She's an embarrassment.

And those rambling, sometimes drunken, videos that she posts on Youtube are proof that she is a borderline nutcase.

I agree about the videos.

The one that turned me off her completely was the video of her talking to the camera while rolling around in the surf in her bikini.

She is a very good-looking woman.

But what kind of serious person posts that kind of shit on the internet?

re: #111 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Do we have any word on when -- or if, and HOW -- Paul Martin will make an appearance?

I just skimmed down the front page, to see if he threw something in (today) at the end of yesterday's posts. Nada.

He made an appearance at Augean Stables. Comment #13. If he bothers to come here, I suspect we'll just get the same garbage.

re: #91 Bloodnok

Yes. As RW mentioned upthread she posts lotsa pictures to prove to the world how popular she is.

A groupie.

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Disappointing, but not surprised. Thanks for all your great work.

re: #123 realwest

Actually, no -- I did not help Pamela set up her blog. Don't blame me for that mess! Heh.

re: #116 gclaghorn

I laugh at her, but never with her.

Haven't read her stuff in ages unless one of her rants is linked here.

Ha. Lizard pool.

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Sorry to hear that. I really am.

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

quintuple HEH!
Thanks!

re: #87 smokefire See now, that's not fair, asking her to "think".
My impression was that first counter-jihad conference was viewed by her as HER PARADE (at least judging by the photos she published) and when Charles posted a mere caution, she felt that he had rained on HER parade.

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Aw, I thought it would come to this. I almost said so, after my deconstruction post last night, just based on the couple of sentences you shared earlier. Is that what he's pissed about?

Doesn't really matter, I think we've seen his whole act already.

re: #106 opnion

Off topic, Maxine Waters is now on with David Gregory.
She is magnificent. If coherent thougts were ammunition, Maxine has a clip full of blanks. I love it when she expresses her opinion, so entertaining.

Besides the obvious, whenever I hear Maxine mentioned it reminds me of the time she said that she was marching in the "pro-choice" rallies/parades because her mother couldn't get an abortion.

Mmmm. I've never been to a public flogging ...

re: #133 Charles

Actually, no -- I did not help Pamela set up her blog. Don't blame me for that mess! Heh.

Can you prove that on your birth certificate? HA! Thought not!

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Are you going to post it, bold text and all, so we can ruthlessly mock?

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

You have to wonder what that whole charade yesterday was all about. He's just dug himself in that much deeper.

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

All in bold text?

Why do I get the feeling that he's the kind of readers that useta' send letters to the editor written in crayon?

re: #84 DistantThunder

Charles just has to stop wear that great cologne. It's driving Pam wild.

(Invention idea: A perfume/cologne that only attracts people of your own political ideology while repelling all others.)

It is called "Integrity".

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Well, he's a coward then.

All the questions could be easily answered, if there were reasonable answers to them.

I suspect, then, that there are no factual reasonable answers, other than the fact that he's worked with Ashraf and likes him. And that's no answer.

Coward.

re: #140 rwmofo

Besides the obvious, whenever I hear Maxine mentioned it reminds me of the time she said that she was marching in the "pro-choice" rallies/parades because her mother couldn't get an abortion.

The woman is a raging loon & that statement proves it. You know that she completely misses the irony.

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Another graduate of the Hamas Academy of Rhetoric.

re: #129 reine.de.tout

I agree about the videos.

The one that turned me off her completely was the video of her talking to the camera while rolling around in the surf in her bikini.

She is a very good-looking woman.

But what kind of serious person posts that kind of shit on the internet?

Insecure women who think their bodies are more important than their brains and what comes out of their mouths?

re: #145 MandyManners

All in bold text?

Why do I get the feeling that he's the kind of readers that useta' send letters to the editor written in crayon?

Do kids use crayons anymore? Everyone in kindergarten already has color ink-jet printers ...

re: #141 rusty_armor

Mmmm. I've never been to a public flogging ...

They're commonplace in places where the Death Cult rules, coincidently.

re: #28 lionfromzion

Ever see Fatal Attraction? Don't be stupid.

re: #117 MandyManners

Touch of narcissism?

Ya think?...I saw one youtube video (I only found it because it was being ridiculed at a leftwing blog) of her, apparently drunk, lipsynching My Sharona with two teenage girls....It was the kind of video any normal person would want destroyed; she posted it on youtube.

re: #125 Charles

He apparently decided not to jump in the pool with the lizard army, and has instead sent me an 8-paragraph email, all in bold text, demanding an apology and failing to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Is it any different than what he posted in the comments at Richard Landes' place?

re: #130 Lynn B.

He made an appearance at Augean Stables. Comment #13. If he bothers to come here, I suspect we'll just get the same garbage.

"Presently I am in Israel filming with the Israeli medical teams who go to the sites of rocket attacks, for example."

Might I be inclined to wonder if Hamas and Islamic Jihad want data which will help them improve their targeting?

Am I implying anything?

/*silence*

re: #117 MandyManners

Touch of narcissism?

Touch?

re: #124 jwb7605

Most of those people also voted for Jimmy Carter.
Discussing and/or debating with those people is exactly the same experience as a conversation with a troofer.

They're not really bad folk. Most of them actually mean well. They're just folk who - for some strange reason are unable to connect dots. Bad wiring maybe?

re: #140 rwmofo

re: #106 opnion

Off topic, Maxine Waters is now on with David Gregory.
She is magnificent. If coherent thougts were ammunition, Maxine has a clip full of blanks. I love it when she expresses her opinion, so entertaining.

Besides the obvious, whenever I hear Maxine mentioned it reminds me of the time she said that she was marching in the "pro-choice" rallies/parades because her mother couldn't get an abortion.

So many layers of irony, I just don't know where to start.

Pam's horror at the prospect of creeping Islam has made her a bit hysterical, but the sources referred to on her site are often worth consideration.

As far as flogging goes, I wouldn't take her literally.

Beats me why she chose that figure of speech.

re: #125 Charles

You going to post the more juicy parts?

re: #129 reine.de.tout

I agree about the videos.

The one that turned me off her completely was the video of her talking to the camera while rolling around in the surf in her bikini.

She is a very good-looking woman.

But what kind of serious person posts that kind of shit on the internet?

Exactly. A person with serious issues.

re: #125 Charles
LOL! All in bold text is as close to a sternly worded UN letter he can get!
He got caught. Period. Thanks to you and to Last Mohican.
Thanks again, Charles.

re: #3 realwest

It's really sad. She should move out of NYC to the country or something. She used to seem sane 6 years ago.

She's gone Lionheart.

re: #84 DistantThunder

Charles just has to stop wear that great cologne. It's driving Pam wild.

(Invention idea: A perfume/cologne that only attracts people of your own political ideology while repelling all others.)

Just dust yourself with a little gun powder.

re: #162 Lynn B.

Exactly. A person with serious issues.

Islam offends her hedonism mostly I think...

LGF is only slightly ahead of ATS in the 2008 Awards poll.

/hint-hint, nudge-nudge

re: #141 rusty_armor

Mmmm. I've never been to a public flogging ...

Yesterday - war via the internet.
Today - a public flogging.
So many 1st's.
/

Let me guess

Charles you *******, I wouldn't touch your lizard with a ten-foot RPG, I only said I would to see your reaction [and because I was very very drunk]. You and your mouth-breathing reptiles are just Joos anyway, racist subhuman scum, why would I want to talk to them, I certainly don't want to listen to their disgusting grunts. Even my nine year old Palestinian wife knows you are an idiot. I will spread my sunshine in places you cannot go. Have a nice, day, you *******.

Regards,
Paul abu-Moonbat

Wasn't there anything going on in NYC for pamela to have her picture taken? Instead she was reduced to posting more threats at Charles. The poor dear.

Don't worry, pam- I'm sure something will come up soon so you can do what you do best- pose.

re: #133 Charles
OK, I'm just sayin' what she said about you're being her blogfather - maybe she meant "inspiration" but that's not the clear implication of the phone call I had with her. Maybe just wanting to associate with you veryclosely (this was, of course, looong before you rained on her parade by cautioning good folks at the counter-jihad conference).

Is it possible to love two people at the same time? I wish you and Pamela well. You have both been an inspiration.

re: #142 jwb7605
ROTFL!

re: #160 pokeefe

Pam's horror at the prospect of creeping Islam has made her a bit hysterical, but the sources referred to on her site are often worth consideration.

As far as flogging goes, I wouldn't take her literally.

Beats me why she chose that figure of speech.

Yeah, no big deal to call for someone to be physically harmed, right? I gotta stop being so sensitive.

re: #151 itellu3times

Do kids use crayons anymore? Everyone in kindergarten already has color ink-jet printers ...

The Kid's school refuses to allow stuff from a printer for his classes.

Seriously, I useta' read some wild letters to the editor. Many would have randomly capitalized letters. Let's not even think about the spelling.

re: #170 itellu3times

I will spread my sunshine in places you cannot go

This should, nay must rotate.

re: #80 Ayatollah Ghilmeini

Charles, ignore her, she isn't worth it.

Pay close attention. SHE's not ignoring Charles.
There is a reason to continue to feud with the master of anti-fascists.
It's all about her popularity and ratings.
I don't think she reads LGF to actually learn anything meaningfu. She's become a useful tool, about her naivete to follow, support, and ferociously condone anything that RS says and does. Even when it's blatantly obvious that RS is sleeping with the enemy.
You may think her body is hot.
Her head and logic is stone cold mush.
Fine to have around if you want a mannequin to prop up where all can gawk at her. You know, Like the PETA's use the models in the pet cages...so you'll stop and take a look at their propaganda.
Look, but use a mirror to do so, don't imbibe in her Medusa-like treachery.

re: #173 fingal
Hmmm:
Registered since: May 23, 2007 at 12:00 pm
(Logged in)

No. of comments posted: 2
No. of links posted: 0

Some of you sleepers are really, really good! Strange for you to make two posts and that was one of 'em.
For the record, I wish Pamela no harm, but wish she'd just...........go away already.

re: #154 Ringo the Gringo

Ya think?...I saw one youtube video (I only found it because it was being ridiculed at a leftwing blog) of her, apparently drunk, lipsynching My Sharona with two teenage girls....It was the kind of video any normal person would want destroyed; she posted it on youtube.

That's bat-poo crazy. Why is she haning out with minors? Were they drunk, too?

re: #160 pokeefe

As far as flogging goes, I wouldn't take her literally.

How do you propose that anyone decide which parts of her postings to take literally?

re: #160 pokeefe

Pam's horror at the prospect of creeping Islam has made her a bit hysterical, but the sources referred to on her site are often worth consideration.

As far as flogging goes, I wouldn't take her literally.

Beats me why she chose that figure of speech.

Sadly, this is not an isolated eruption. Just a loonier and more violent one than usual.

re: #5 Lynn B.

OMFG!

What Lynn B. said.

I am so damned pissed off right now that anything I said about that harridan/meshugana would be [deleted].

Anyone know of a good Psychiatrist in NYC? Or does Pamela require immediate commission to a mental institution?

She is a shanda (disgrace) to the Jews.

re: #157 Sharmuta

Touch?

Much more than a smidgen.

re: #101 unrealizedviewpoint

Great points. I'd almost agree fully except a lot of adults, not just wide-eyed youth voted for this HopeNchange. I believe human beings simply do not have any collective memory and are simply stuck on repeat.

Repeat is the operative word in that a fellow worker (31 yrs old) voted for the Democrats "cause daddy always voted Democrat". She would run out of the room or become very silent when political discussion erupted around the coffee machine prior to the election.
She knew better as well, but could live with herself if she erased daddy's vote.

re: #141 rusty_armor

Mmmm. I've never been to a public flogging ...

Slighty less gruesome than a SF Gay Pride parade.

re: #184 MandyManners

Much more than a smidgen.

I was thinking "flaming".

re: #179 realwest

For the record, I wish Pamela no harm, but wish she'd just...........go away already.

That's the difference between us and Pamela, evidently.

re: #171 Sharmuta

Wasn't there anything going on in NYC for pamela to have her picture taken? Instead she was reduced to posting more threats at Charles. The poor dear.

Don't worry, pam- I'm sure something will come up soon so you can do what you do best- pose.

*meow*

Touch (ED) is more like it.

re: #32 RememberSekhmet?

I've been doing a little thinking, and I realized something:

The way I figure it, most people don't start paying attention to world events much before the age of 13 or 14. They might start thinking of themselves as potential voters about the age of 16, and cannot vote before the age of 18. So, let's think about some of the historical events that had the potential to shape the opinions of people in a more conservative direction, especially if you actually witnessed these events yourself, instead of having to rely on the accounts from biased media and historians.

If you were under the age of 50 in 2008, you could not have lived to regret voting for Jimmy Carter.If you were under the age of 41, you may not have remembered much about the Carter years at all, except for going to see Star Wars with your parents.

It was those 46-year-olds who watched the Church Committees neuter the CIA, then watched America's enemies respond by feeling themselves free to take over other countries who voted for Reagan in 1980.

If you were 35 or 36 years old or older in 2008, you would remember the Achille Lauro, preceded by years and years of PLO hijackings of airliners. If you were 30, you would remember the collapse of the USSR, and the campaign to rehabilitate the image of the Palestinians in anticipation of the Oslo Accords the 28-year-olds may remember.

You would have had to be 34 in 2008 to have regretted voting for Bill Clinton in 1992. If you were younger than 24 in 2008, it would have been inappropriate to discuss the Monica Lewinsky incident, and thus the whys and wherefores of the Clinton impeachment as it was happening.

To anyone younger than 30, the Cold War was something to read about in a history book commissioned by NEA members and written by a history professor who spent his or her spare time agitating for CISPES and divestment from South Africa.

A 19-year old's political awareness was shaped almost entirely by the election of George W Bush in 2000, and the subsequent leftist campaign against him.

And this is why Obama won in 2008.

RS, for an optimistic point, my daughter says that most of her classmates at a large public school laugh at "global warming." She's in middle school in a pretty liberal area with lib teachers. but the kids laugh when the CNN for kids they watch in social studies reports on "global warming."

the kids are all right, and aren't quite brainwashed enough to ignore it when they freeze their buns off waiting for the bus or carpool

re: #173 fingal

Is it possible to love two people at the same time? I wish you and Pamela well. You have both been an inspiration.

What's to love?

Charles does not associate with fascists!

re: #184 MandyManners

Much more than a smidgen.

she's the B Spears of the bloggosphere...it's a niche she seems to have all to herself...so she's self centered and defiant and considers herself pretty special...imo

re: #189 MandyManners

They say the truth hurts.

re: #176 MandyManners

The Kid's school refuses to allow stuff from a printer for his classes.

Well, good, I approve, I think. For one thing, too easy for Mom to do the work, hey? I'd start the use of word processors for assignments no earlier than, oh, maybe fifth grade.

re: #180 MandyManners

Why is she haning out with minors? Were they drunk, too?

No then didn't appear to be.

re: #193 albusteve

she's the B Spears of the bloggosphere...it's a niche she seems to have all to herself...so she's self centered and defiant and considers herself pretty special...imo

Well...there IS Wonkette too...

/tough competition out there.

re: #187 Sharmuta

I was thinking "flaming".

The more I've read of her shenanigans, I agree with you.

re: #175 Charles

I am so sorry that she went totally spare and went after you like that.

/She must be having a bad hair day, or getting wrinkles.

I hope that she loses a lot of readers, and that the votes for her dry up like tumble weed, but how much basic intelligence can her readers have?

She reminds me of Gloria Swanson in 'Sunset Boulevard'.

re: #196 Ringo the Gringo

No then didn't appear to be.

then = they

re: #185 jelo

PIMF: but could "NOT" live with herself

re: #193 albusteve

she's the B Spears of the bloggosphere...it's a niche she seems to have all to herself...so she's self centered and defiant and considers herself pretty special...imo

A spayshul snowflake!

re: #170 itellu3times

You left out "honcos"

re: #194 Sharmuta

They say the truth hurts.

Is she self-aware enough to feel the bite?

re: #168 Fat Jolly Penguin
SCREW the hint-hint, nudge nudge - I've posted this so often just because it pisses me off: Charles offers us goodies almost beyond belief - including the best technological blog around, and LGF has less votes in over a week than we get comments here in one day.
I know Charles doesn't give a damn about those silly awards and neither do I, but I do care about the manifest fact that so many people take advantage of what he gives us on LGF but won't take the time to vote once for LGF.

re: #195 itellu3times

Well, good, I approve, I think. For one thing, too easy for Mom to do the work, hey? I'd start the use of word processors for assignments no earlier than, oh, maybe fifth grade.

He can print photographs off the Internet for projects but, that's it.

re: #176 MandyManners

The Kid's school refuses to allow stuff from a printer for his classes.

Seriously, I useta' read some wild letters to the editor. Many would have randomly capitalized letters. Let's not even think about the spelling.

Mandy - my daughter used to use powerpoint to create her own "flash cards".

She would type a question on a "slide", then the answer with a "delay" built in - then run the slide show.

Typing the stuff into powerpoint was a study method in itself - then she could play the slide show, see a question, have a few seconds to answer it, then the answer would appear.

It was fun for her, and worked well.

re: #196 Ringo the Gringo

No then didn't appear to be.

Someone had some common sense.

re: #203 EmmmieG

You left out "honcos"

HONCO! HONCO!

re: #173 fingal

You have both been an inspiration.

/Fixed it for you.

re: #198 MandyManners

The more I've read of her shenanigans, I agree with you.

Reading isn't really required- just go to her site sometime and count the number of pictures of herself that are posted vs. the number of pictures dealing with whatever event she's attending. She'll be in 80% of the pics.

ME! LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEEEE!

It's just reeks from her site.

Geller was great as Buffy. Would you agree to be flogged if she showed us her tits?

re: #207 reine.de.tout

Mandy - my daughter used to use powerpoint to create her own "flash cards".

She would type a question on a "slide", then the answer with a "delay" built in - then run the slide show.

Typing the stuff into powerpoint was a study method in itself - then she could play the slide show, see a question, have a few seconds to answer it, then the answer would appear.

It was fun for her, and worked well.

He's been using his new Satellite to make home-movies. Future Spielberg?

re: #204 MandyManners

Is she self-aware enough to feel the bite?

She'll want a picture of reality biting her. Make sure you get her good side.

re: #211 Sharmuta

Reading isn't really required- just go to her site sometime and count the number of pictures of herself that are posted vs. the number of pictures dealing with whatever event she's attending. She'll be in 80% of the pics.

ME! LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEEEE!

It's just reeks from her site.

I'd be concerned about people knowing what I looked like if I was running a blog as well-known as hers.

I think the Earth really is hollow. And the government has bugged my TV set. But I know who THEY are. THEY don't think I know, but I do. I am watching THEM. I won't let THEM catch me.

re: #212 CofactorMatrix

*whack*

re: #211 Sharmuta

Reading isn't really required- just go to her site sometime and count the number of pictures of herself that are posted vs. the number of pictures dealing with whatever event she's attending. She'll be in 80% of the pics.

ME! LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEEEE!

It's just reeks from her site.

I noticed that too - esp. with her v-logs (videos).

Look at how she portrays herself.

Weird.

re: #214 Sharmuta

She'll want a picture of reality biting her. Make sure you get her good side.

Well, I won't take one of her butt.

re: #181 jaunte
and
re: #182 Lynn B.
Kidnly see my #179.

re: #212 CofactorMatrix

Um, no.

re: #217 MandyManners

Sorry. I've taken my medicine now. Feeling better. Just lost my head for a sec.

re: #130 Lynn B.

He made an appearance at Augean Stables. Comment #13. If he bothers to come here, I suspect we'll just get the same garbage.

Yep, he sent me the same thing in email. I'm trying to decide if it's worth posting.

re: #213 MandyManners

He's been using his new Satellite to make home-movies. Future Spielberg?

Could be!
One of the very best things I ever got for my daughter was a video camera, when she was about 11.

She loved it, and the videos and her narration are hilarious!

re: #192 MandyManners
AMEN!

re: #180 MandyManners

That's bat-poo crazy. Why is she haning out with minors? Were they drunk, too?

I haven't seen it but it's possible they were her daughters. Back when I actually visited her site occasionally I seem to recall that she put them in a lot of her videos. Which I found a bit creepy.

re: #180 MandyManners

That's bat-poo crazy. Why is she haning out with minors? Were they drunk, too?

I think they were her daughters.

re: #218 reine.de.tout

I noticed that too - esp. with her v-logs (videos).

Look at how she portrays herself.

Weird.

I used to respect her, but now I'm trying to figure out why I ever did.

Dear Ms. Geller:

Imagine conservatism (Reagan-style conservatism) to be a nice, hot, juicy apple pie. With flaky crusts, and steam, and juices bubbling up. You get the picture.

Now, imagine that the crazy wingnut or racism stuff is a big steaming pile of poo. Calling for the death of small children is poo, straight up. Trooferism is poo. Hating entire nations is poo.

Call me crazy, but I do not wish poo in my pie.

re: #229 EmmmieG

I do not wish poo in my pie.

Rotating title? :)

re: #211 Sharmuta
Hi Sharm! Uh, I'd guess it's more than 80%; I think she approaches about 95%.

re: #226 Lynn B.

They were her daughters.

re: #85 jwb7605

Your comment reminds me of an article on Politico on Bill Cosby.

I applaud half the message. (The sound of one hand clapping)

Sad. Cosby says things that blacks need to hear, but still thinks whites/conservatives are racist....like all those racists who have made him rich and have supported his message to black parents while blacks like Maxine Waters have blasted him.

Louis Farrakhan encourages blacks to behave responsibly and actually parent their children too.

re: #175 Charles

Yeah, no big deal to call for someone to be physically harmed, right? I gotta stop being so sensitive.

Advocating physical violence on a fellow conservative blogger, even one with whom you have such divergent views, is the type of verbal abuse I've come to expect of the raving moonbat crowd. I'm embarrassed for her.

I am very pleased to see the lunatic fringe identifying itself so early and so plainly. It will greatly facilitate the task of rebuilding the conservative opposition in time for 2012.

If Malcolm X really were Obama's father, there would be no question of the Messiah's eligibility, since both Malcolm and Anne were indisputably American citizens.

re: #154 Ringo the Gringo

Ya think?...I saw one youtube video (I only found it because it was being ridiculed at a leftwing blog) of her, apparently drunk, lipsynching My Sharona with two teenage girls....It was the kind of video any normal person would want destroyed; she posted it on youtube.

Ringo - she was not lip-synching - she was singing, along the music from My Sharona - but if I recall, the song she sang had to do with her "va-jay-jay" or something.

Is this woman the one that had her pic taken with Cindy Shehag and was flipping her middle finger?

re: #223 Charles

Yep, he sent me the same thing in email. I'm trying to decide if it's worth posting.

Well, as you say, he failed to address a single factual point about the staged video.

Someone posted it in the comments a thread or two ago and it was being nicely dissected last I looked.

re: #217 MandyManners
Deserves a couple of 'em I'd say!

re: #209 MandyManners

HONCO! HONCO!

I think I missed something. What is a HONCO?

re: #179 realwest

Hmmm:
Registered since: May 23, 2007 at 12:00 pm
(Logged in)

No. of comments posted: 2
No. of links posted: 0

Some of you sleepers are really, really good! Strange for you to make two posts and that was one of 'em.
For the record, I wish Pamela no harm, but wish she'd just...........go away already.

Realwest...flogging IS wishing harm.

re: #227 reine.de.tout

I think they were her daughters.

GMTA

Now you've gone and done it... too bad... stew in your uncreation juice. Atlas is a gem... tah, tah.
Fire away zoids.

re: #232 NY Nana

They were her daughters.

Oy vey!

re: #232 NY Nana

They were her daughters.

The Addams family?

re: #240 Bobblehead

I think I missed something. What is a HONCO?

Read this thread and comments.

re: #235 Shiplord Kirel
Good afternoon Shiplord. Excellent comment. Thanks.

I should state, I don't wish pamela any harm- I wish her sanity, modesty, and a conscience.

re: #234 Bobblehead

Advocating physical violence on a fellow conservative blogger, even one with whom you have such divergent views, is the type of verbal abuse I've come to expect of the raving moonbat crowd. I'm embarrassed for her.

Save your embarrassment. You're not responsible for her behavior. Thank Goodness...we'd all have no embarrassment left if we used it up on these Nazi lovers.

re: #243 new2thezoo
Ummmm. You are aware the VB is nazis' under different colors, right?

re: #243 new2thezoo

tick ... tick ... tick ...

re: #240 Bobblehead

I think I missed something. What is a HONCO?

Honco is the latest in a series of moonbat-donated epithets that we have hijacked adopted as our own.

My, my --isn't Charles just so special!

re: #248 Sharmuta

I should state, I don't wish pamela any harm- I wish her sanity, modesty, and a conscience.

Amen.

Is John Bolton aware of this? Hope he doesn't keep granting her interviews.

re: #253 Nancy
Yep.

re: #241 notutopia
Yes, but I wish her no physical harm at all. That she said that about Charles reveals more of her lack of character than anything else. But it still doesn't justify wishing physical harm to her.

Ooooo. They're coming swarming out of the woodwork.

Eureka! I have found Atlas a perfect lawyer! If Ann France is licensed in the U.S.? The 'dream team' as client and attorney!

Now who would be good to portray them in the TV movie? Any suggestions? Of course it would have to be filmed inside the locked facility they would be placed in.

re: #255 Sharmuta
He may be doing it to hope some common sense sinks in.