Video: Judgment Day - Intelligent Design on Trial

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Video • Tue Feb 10, 2009 at 8:06 pm PST • Views: 1,014

This NOVA show about the landmark Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District creationism trial is a must-see, revealing the deceptive agenda of the “intelligent design” crowd in their own words and actions. Highly recommended.

" target="_blank">Google Video ” target=”_blank”>video.google.com…]

Also see:
The Defeat of ‘Intelligent Design’ in Pennsylvania

Advertisement

533 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:08:14pm

Thank you, sir. I will make it a point to watch the whole thing.

2 HoosierHoops  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:08:27pm

Just excellent..

3 Racer X  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:08:45pm

On TV right now. PBS.

4 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:09:23pm

Thanks, Charles.

Though I've already seen it once, I want to watch it again, and I have a few people I want to send this link to.

5 RightLogic  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:11:33pm

Why can't the ID crowd accept the fact that maybe God set into motion things billions upon billions of years ago, stood back (so to speak) and that we are who we are based on this start via evolution.

6 Manfred the Wonder Dog  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:12:24pm

Those mural-burners provided enough evidence that they're descended from ape-like creatures to suit me...

7 lostlakehiker  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:14:26pm

Hrrrmph. I don't need to see the movie; I read the book.

(Monkey Girl).

8 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:14:52pm

re: #5 RightLogic

Because they think Genesis and the Fall must be literal in order to justify Jesus' sacrifice.

9 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:15:23pm

re: #7 lostlakehiker

Hrrrmph. I don't need to see the movie; I read the book.

(Monkey Girl).

I'm reading that book right now, but I would still watch this. It's very good.

10 rightwinger3  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:15:27pm

That's great..."It makes people stupid". Previous thread anyone?

11 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:15:52pm

re: #6 Manfred the Wonder Dog

Those mural-burners provided enough evidence that they're descended from back into ape-like creatures to suit me...

fixed. But seriously, when people turn to the destruction of other people's speech, I turn against the destroyers. I've seen the world they want to build and I don't want to live in it!

12 HelloDare  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:16:00pm

re: #5 RightLogic

Why can't the ID crowd accept the fact that maybe God set into motion things billions upon billions of years ago, stood back (so to speak) and that we are who we are based on this start via evolution.

Because then the bible would be open to broad interpretation. The nose of the camel under the tent.

13 CynicalConservative  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:16:20pm

re: #10 rightwinger3

That's great..."It makes people stupid". Previous thread anyone?

How did Sorge get into that video?

14 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:16:22pm

re: #5 RightLogic

Why can't the ID crowd accept the fact that maybe God set into motion things billions upon billions of years ago, stood back (so to speak) and that we are who we are based on this start via evolution.

Sounds a lot like deism, which most Christians reject.

However, the term "intelligent design" is the mask for a political movement, no less than "pro-choice." Both terms are intended to mis-lead the hearer.

15 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:17:13pm

re: #8 Sharmuta

Because they think Genesis and the Fall must be literal in order to justify Jesus' sacrifice.

Phil Collins got nothin' to do with that.

16 VioletTiger  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:19:17pm

Fun(ny) fact of the day...

Over 25% of human genes are the same as a banana.

Sort of makes you feel humble...

17 Dar ul Harb  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:19:38pm

re: #15 victor_yugo

Phil Collins got nothin' to do with that.

But Peter Gabriel did.

18 Kosh's Shadow  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:19:49pm

People who think science disproves the existence of a Creator, and those who think that there have to be holes in science for their version of a Creator, both have limited understanding of the universe and the Creator.

I am amazed at the universe G-d created, in such a way that He could still influence it without breaking any of His physical laws. From what I know of physics, quantum mechanics allows Him to direct the universe without resorting to breaking physical laws. To me, that is a true miracle, and shows how great G-d is; I do not need to limit Him due to my own lack of imagination.

19 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:19:56pm

Isn't the Discovery Center the proponent of ID?

20 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:20:05pm

re: #16 VioletTiger

Some guys would say "yeah, sounds about right."

21 VioletTiger  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:20:20pm

re: #10 rightwinger3

That's great..."It makes people stupid". Previous thread anyone?

The perfect response to the complaints that we talk about it too much.

22 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:20:57pm

re: #19 Afrocity

Isn't the Discovery Center the proponent of ID?

Discovery Institute, and yes.

23 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:21:22pm

re: #5 RightLogic

Why can't the ID crowd accept the fact that maybe God set into motion things billions upon billions of years ago, stood back (so to speak) and that we are who we are based on this start via evolution.

Well that would still imply a "designer" to get the process started, which is one of the arguments that they use. I am going to choose my words very carefully on this, I have since learned from my last foray into an ID thread,

24 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:21:40pm

re: #22 Sharmuta

Discovery Institute, and yes.

Fixed.

25 HelloDare  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:22:13pm

re: #5 RightLogic

Why can't the ID crowd accept the fact that maybe God set into motion things billions upon billions of years ago, stood back (so to speak) and that we are who we are based on this start via evolution.

Like the Earth is a train set in God's basement that he set in motion years ago. He's upstairs watching a football game and having a beer. At half time, he's going to go downstairs again. Won't he be surprised.

26 jcm  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:23:04pm

re: #19 Afrocity

Isn't the Discovery Center the proponent of ID?

Or as know around these parts...
Disco Institute.
;-)

27 Kosh's Shadow  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:23:20pm

re: #12 HelloDare

Because then the bible would be open to broad interpretation. The nose of the camel under the tent.

The Bible is open to interpretation; even the Jews cannot agree on how to interpret it. Some Kabbalists have determined from the Bible that the universe is 15.5 billion years old, and life on Earth 2.5 billion; other Jews believe the universe was created 5769 years ago, such that it was already billions of years ago.
And requiring strict interpretation on an English translation, which comes from a Latin translation, which comes from a Greek translation, when we don't quite know what many of the original Hebrew words mean, requires a lot of chutzpah, I think.

28 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:23:55pm

re: #25 HelloDare

Like the Earth is a train set in God's basement that he set in motion years ago. He's upstairs watching a football game and having a beer. At half time, he's going to go downstairs again. Won't he be surprised.

what was it Robin Wiliam's said one time "(God) I gave you this beautiful world and you fucked it up"

29 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:24:10pm

re: #19 Afrocity

If you're new to this, I recommend clicking on the tags under the article. They will lead you to a wide variety of previous stories about this issue posted on LGF and there's plenty to read that will get you up to speed.

30 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:24:22pm

re: #15 victor_yugo

Phil Collins got nothin' to do with that.

re: #17 Dar ul Harb

But Peter Gabriel did.

Great singers, both of them. Here, have a listen:

31 Kosh's Shadow  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:24:27pm

re: #26 jcm

Or as know around these parts...
Disco Institute.
;-)

Is that because it is made up of dancing fools?

32 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:24:49pm

What is the Conservative position? I remember Bush thinking that it was fine to teach creationism in school alongside evolution.

Bush "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes..."

33 Cato the Elder  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:25:02pm

Here's a question that's been bothering me: How could we prevent "religions" like $cientology that are really nothing but money-making scams from taking advantage of the tax exemption for churches, without discriminating against legitimate religion, even if they're wacky?

Couldn't there be a law written to prevent this kind of abuse? By, say, making it illegal to charge gobs of money for "religious initiation" and the like?

Quid dicetis, O lacerti?

34 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:25:10pm

re: #27 Kosh's Shadow

The Bible is open to interpretation; even the Jews cannot agree on how to interpret it. Some Kabbalists have determined from the Bible that the universe is 15.5 billion years old, and life on Earth 2.5 billion; other Jews believe the universe was created 5769 years ago, such that it was already billions of years ago.
And requiring strict interpretation on an English translation, which comes from a Latin translation, which comes from a Greek translation, when we don't quite know what many of the original Hebrew words mean, requires a lot of chutzpah, I think.

some of it was even written in ancient Aramaic

35 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:25:13pm

NOVA- one of the few good things left about PBS.

36 Racer X  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:26:18pm

Little Tony had been playing outside with the other kids for a while when he came into the house and asked, 'Grandma, what's that thing called when two people sleep in the same room and one is on top of the other?'

Gramma was a little surprised, but she decided to just tell him the truth. 'It's called sexual intercourse, honey'

Little Tony just said, 'Oh, OK,' and went back outside to
Play with the other kids.

A few minutes later he came back in and said angrily,
'Grandma, it isn't called sexual intercourse. It's called Bunk Beds. And Jimmy's mom wants to talk to you!

37 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:27:03pm

re: #32 Afrocity

What is the Conservative position? I remember Bush thinking that it was fine to teach creationism in school alongside evolution.

Bush "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes..."

That depends on who you ask. Some people think it's conservative to be a Biblical literalist. Most of us reject that.

Conservatives on this blog believe in limited government, fiscal responsibility and individual rights.

But that shouldn't matter. What matters is the science, and intelligent design is not science. It's not even good theology.

38 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:27:07pm

re: #33 Cato the Elder

Here's a question that's been bothering me: How could we prevent "religions" like $cientology that are really nothing but money-making scams from taking advantage of the tax exemption for churches, without discriminating against legitimate religion, even if they're wacky?

Couldn't there be a law written to prevent this kind of abuse? By, say, making it illegal to charge gobs of money for "religious initiation" and the like?

Quid dicetis, O lacerti?

and who would we appoint as the judge? An inpartial panel? I know Germany is trying to run them out over there, but with Scienetology, Ron Hubbard even tells what he is going to do in plain English...

39 Stonemason  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:27:21pm

re: #12 HelloDare

Because then the bible would be open to broad interpretation. The nose of the camel under the tent.

I have heard that before, and, strangely enough, I do that every time I open a bible, I look for meaning in passages I have missed before.

Belief in God does not preclude belief in Evolution.
Belief in evolution does not preclude belief in God.

I think I have seen that somewhere before.

40 Yankee Division Son  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:28:02pm

I saw this tonight on WGBH 2 Boston. It was excellent. Simple common sense explanations of complex issues. It reminded me of the show they did explaining how Albert Einstein performed very simple "thought experiments" working on his theories.

41 Neo Con since 9-11  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:28:15pm

re: #16 VioletTiger

Fun(ny) fact of the day...

Over 25% of human genes are the same as a banana.

Sort of makes you feel humble...


But, I thought bananas were proof of an Intelligent Designer.

42 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:29:29pm

re: #41 Neo Con since 9-11

that would explain all the slip ups some folks have...

43 RightLogic  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:29:40pm

re: #23 Marvo76

Don't get me wrong. I am a Christian (Roman Catholic) and I do believe in a God but if He didn't want man to explore, question and theorize about our surroundings then He would not have allowed us to evolve to the beings that we are. No one has all the answers as to why we are the way we are (and the meaning of life itself - Monty Python skits aside) but until someone comes up with a sound alternative theory to Darwin then, as a logical thinker, I will continue to believe in evolution but at the same time have faith that there is a higher purpose to life - no matter how we got here.

44 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:29:57pm

re: #39 Stonemason

I have heard that before, and, strangely enough, I do that every time I open a bible, I look for meaning in passages I have missed before.

Belief in God does not preclude belief in Evolution.
Belief in evolution does not preclude belief in God.

I think I have seen that somewhere before.

Yes, the Tao of Lao Stinky. :)

45 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:30:46pm

Afrocity- most LGFers are people of faith, but we have atheists and agnostics as well. Most of us subscribe to what is called Theistic evolution.

Intelligent design, on the other hand, is a mask for literal Biblical 6 day creationism. Instead of continuing to search for scientific answers, ID wants to throw up it's hands and say "God did it". That's just not science.

46 VioletTiger  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:31:15pm

re: #41 Neo Con since 9-11

lol! how did you find that?

47 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:31:16pm

re: #43 RightLogic

there are some mysteries that are reserved for God, seems like I heard that in a sermon once...

48 HelloDare  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:31:38pm

Damn those Scientismists.

The Proper Role of Science
By Chuck Colson

Exposing Scientism
...Our task is to expose the flaws in scientific naturalism—not because we are against science but because we want it to fill its proper role as a means of investigating God’s world and alleviating suffering within ethical boundaries.

49 CynicalConservative  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:31:54pm

re: #43 RightLogic

Are you associated with RightKlik? Just asking.

50 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:31:55pm

re: #29 Sharmuta

Gracias.

I have issues that I think I am strong about. This one is new to me along with stem cell research. IE something I do not have a firm opinion on.

On instinct I feel if you teach a child one view you should teach the other. I remember when Sarah Palin began to run many liberals I knew where up in arms about her being a creationist and asked how could I support her. I am of the opinion that your religion or belief system is your business as long as it does not interfere with your job in office. I am for separation of church and state. During the debates I thought Sarah made it clear that she did not let her faith or beliefs cloud her judgment as far as her position as governor.
I was fine with that answer.

51 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:32:07pm

re: #36 Racer X

LOL! I'm stealing that one.

52 jcm  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:33:18pm

re: #16 VioletTiger

Fun(ny) fact of the day...

Over 25% of human genes are the same as a banana.

Sort of makes you feel humble...

re: #41 Neo Con since 9-11

But, I thought bananas were proof of an Intelligent Designer.

That only proves putting condoms on bananas in school may be a good idea.
//

53 RightLogic  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:33:30pm

re: #49 CynicalConservative

Are you associated with RightKlik? Just asking.

No, I think I had the "No-Left Turn" icon first but no biggy.

54 Charles Johnson  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:33:33pm

re: #32 Afrocity

What is the Conservative position?

The judge in the Dover case was John E. Jones III, a lifelong Republican appointed by George W. Bush, and a devout Lutheran.

And his decision completely destroyed the creationists who were trying to force their religion into the public schools of Dover.

That's the true conservative position. The people who promote creationism in public schools are trying to force their own religious beliefs on everyone else's children, and that's as far from a "conservative" position as it's possible to be.

55 Neo Con since 9-11  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:33:56pm

re: #46 VioletTiger

That video is an old joke on LGF.

56 RightLogic  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:34:46pm

re: #47 Marvo76

there are some mysteries that are reserved for God...

As there should be.

57 HelloDare  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:34:57pm

re: #27 Kosh's Shadow

Because then the bible would be open to broad interpretation. The nose of the camel under the tent.

If it were open to truly broad interpretation, evolution would be okay.

58 CynicalConservative  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:34:57pm

re: #53 RightLogic

No, I think I had the "No-Left Turn" icon first but no biggy.

No worries, no disrespect intended.

59 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:34:59pm

re: #50 Afrocity

This issue shouldn't be political, but it is because some have made it that way. That's unfortunate, imo. I hope you watch this video, because it will give you most of the basics on the issue.

Most of us at LGF accept evolution. We also support the right of those that don't, but we draw the line at indoctrinating other people's kids.

60 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:35:42pm

re: #47 Marvo76

there are some mysteries that are reserved for God, seems like I heard that in a sermon once...

That's the very definition of "musterion": what the human mind will never comprehend, in this life or the next.

61 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:36:27pm

Afrocity- I saw earlier you said if you could meet a famous person it would be John McCain. If I could meet someone, it would be Judge Jones. He's a new hero of mine.

62 jaunte  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:36:57pm

re: #50 Afrocity

That instinctive desire on the part of most Americans to be fair and let the other side have a hearing is what the Discovery Institute people are taking advantage of, when they try to elevate a collection of criticisms of evolutionary theory into the same position as the theory itself.

63 RightLogic  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:37:08pm

re: #54 Charles

Hear, hear!

64 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:37:11pm

re: #48 HelloDare

Damn those Scientismists.

It is fitting that the ID movement should feature one of Richard Nixon's dirty tricks men. When you want to abuse the law and your authority, you want people who've done it before. Colson and the Disco Institute deserve each other.

65 Stonemason  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:37:14pm

re: #59 Sharmuta

This issue shouldn't be political, but it is because some have made it that way. That's unfortunate, imo. I hope you watch this video, because it will give you most of the basics on the issue.

Most of us at LGF accept evolution. We also support the right of those that don't, but we draw the line at indoctrinating other people's kids.

It is so nice at the begining of these threads when those who have been here explain the position to the newbies in a kind, thoughtful, and respectful manner.
Then, well, it becomes best to lurk.

66 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:37:27pm

I went to catholic school most of my life. I consider my self spiritual because I pray and believe in Jesus but I don't attend formal church services. I lived in Texas for a while and everyone there was very open about religion which made me uncomfortable as a Chicagoan because I considered it private, or culturally in the city, it was not polite to bring it up.

67 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:37:41pm

re: #60 victor_yugo

Never heard that term before, which denominations use it?

68 RightLogic  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:37:43pm

re: #58 CynicalConservative

None taken. :-)

69 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:38:09pm

re: #32 Afrocity

What is the Conservative position? I remember Bush thinking that it was fine to teach creationism in school alongside evolution.

Bush "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes..."

Its not about exposure so much as it is about indoctrination.

Science is not a religion.

The Discovery Institute is trying to blur the differences between science and religion.

if the Discovery Institute Cult can confuse enough people into thinking that science is equivalent to religion, then they can make it impossible to teach science and the scientific method in the government school system.

Once the scientific method is overthrown in the schools, they can use the government run schools to propagate religious dogma.

What they seem to fail to grasp is that once they let that camels nose under the tent, they will not be able to stop any other religion from using the government run school system to propagate their religions with the same state authority that the Discovery Institute Cult is seeking.

Babylon will reign.

70 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:38:28pm

re: #66 Afrocity

The Catholic Church supports evolution, and has rejected ID as unscientific and bad theology.

71 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:38:51pm

re: #19 Afrocity

Isn't the Discovery Center the proponent of ID?

They are one of the main proponents, yes.

Makes me wonder why they found Liberal Moonbat Seattle so congenial a home for promoting their brand of Religious Theocracy.

72 esch  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:39:59pm

re: #38 Marvo76

That's the crux of it. Plenty of so-called pious people and entire churches of many different faiths have been busted for profit-making activities over the years. Right now it's pretty much the IRS that makes the determination.

73 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:40:16pm

re: #67 Marvo76

The ancient, ancient, ancient Greeks. Linguistic evolution "adjusted" the 'u' into a 'y' to give us the newer "mysterion".

The definition, however, has not changed. The Eastern Orthodox still use the term, with the same meaning.

74 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:40:19pm

re: #65 Stonemason

It's the ability to tell an honest question from someone trying to jerk us around. I trust that Afrocity just needs to be brought up to speed since she is new.

75 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:40:30pm

re: #32 Afrocity

What is the Conservative position? I remember Bush thinking that it was fine to teach creationism in school alongside evolution.

Bush "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes..."

You pretty much answered your question by mentioning Bush, who frankly never will be considered a paragon of Conservative ideals or thought.

76 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:40:42pm

re: #74 Sharmuta

It's the ability to tell an honest question from someone trying to jerk us around. I trust that Afrocity just needs to be brought up to speed since she is new.

And I like to help.

77 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:40:48pm

re: #69 Syrah

It already started in CA where some text books have been "modified" to show Islam in a more favorable light. I believe they have even had Indoctrination in to how muslims worship as sort of a "social enlightenment" or culture appreciation exercise...

78 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:41:10pm

re: #54 Charles

So I would agree with that. That beliefs should not be forced upon anyone.

I also felt the same way when Obama indoctrination (kids chanting, etc)was taking place in public schools too. Or wearing political buttons to class when you are a K-12 teacher. Granted politics is not religion, I still feel that it is a belief system.

79 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:41:59pm

re: #69 Syrah

Science is not a religion.

Unless your name is Carl Sagan, or Stephen Jay Gould, or Charles Darwin, or Richard Dawkins, or or or...

80 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:43:07pm

The Vatican and Evolution:

The Vatican has admitted that Charles Darwin was on the right track when he claimed that Man descended from apes.

A leading official declared yesterday that Darwin’s theory of evolution was compatible with Christian faith, and could even be traced to St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas. “In fact, what we mean by evolution is the world as created by God,” said Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture. The Vatican also dealt the final blow to speculation that Pope Benedict XVI might be prepared to endorse the theory of Intelligent Design, whose advocates credit a “higher power” for the complexities of life.

More reading on the Church's position:

[Link: blogs.telegraph.co.uk...]
[Link: www.catholicculture.org...]
[Link: www.catholic.org...]

81 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:43:54pm

re: #33 Cato the Elder

Here's a question that's been bothering me: How could we prevent "religions" like $cientology that are really nothing but money-making scams from taking advantage of the tax exemption for churches, without discriminating against legitimate religion, even if they're wacky?

Couldn't there be a law written to prevent this kind of abuse? By, say, making it illegal to charge gobs of money for "religious initiation" and the like?

Quid dicetis, O lacerti?

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Technically, a crafty legislator could potentially shut down any religious practice, as long as they upheld the right of the practitioner to believe.

Although, I think that is a very slippery slope.

82 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:46:07pm

re: #79 victor_yugo

Forget a sarc tag?

83 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:46:16pm

re: #81 Scion9

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Technically, a crafty legislator could potentially shut down any religious practice, as long as they upheld the right of the practitioner to believe.

Although, I think that is a very slippery slope.

What kinds of laws are there against human sacrifice?

84 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:46:22pm

Thank you Sharmuta. I did not know the issues involving ID. I have heard it was conservative based, then I go to Wikipedia (which is seldom accurate anyway) and it says:

Discovery Institute, a politically conservative think tank...

Well I guess that depends upon the views of the person who did the wiki entry.

85 HelloDare  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:46:29pm

re: #54 Charles

The judge in the Dover case was John E. Jones III, a lifelong Republican appointed by George W. Bush, and a devout Lutheran.

And his decision completely destroyed the creationists who were trying to force their religion into the public schools of Dover.

That's the true conservative position. The people who promote creationism in public schools are trying to force their own religious beliefs on everyone else's children, and that's as far from a "conservative" position as it's possible to be.

Yes. And seems to me the proper, the really conservative position would be to oppose organized prayer in schools. There are a few ministers who hold this position, not many.

Why would you want government at a local or national level mixed up in religion? It's not like you can't privately pray in school. You can. Nobody is stopping you. I never understood the religious right's position on this.

Would the religious right be for organized prayer in school if 3/4 of the children bowed down and faced Mecca?

86 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:46:31pm

re: #69 Syrah

I see the Disco folks wanting their own brand of Theocracy just as restrictive and repressive as exists in Saudi Arabia or Iran. Once they get the reins of power they won't let anyone else even close.

87 jcm  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:47:21pm

re: #32 Afrocity

What is the Conservative position? I remember Bush thinking that it was fine to teach creationism in school alongside evolution.

Bush "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes..."

First as a Christian I'm offended by the DI use of religion for seeking political power. Google "Wedge Document" or "Wedge Strategy" it's not a biblical way to spread the gospel.

Intelligent Design cannot be science. It proposes an intelligent agent as a the cause of speciation. That's metaphysics, and out side the realm of science. There is no why to propose a hypothesis to test the existence of such a designer.

The conservative position is one of liberty, you are free to believe what you choose. However you are not permitted to use governmental agencies to push beliefs on everyone.

The problem with teaching "both sides" is there are more than two sides. Once a religious creation story is allowed in public schools, all creation stories will ask for equal time.

In a perfect world, where critical thinking skills are well established, in a comparative religion class presenting the various creation stories may be appropriate.

88 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:47:50pm

re: #82 Sharmuta

Forget a sarc tag?

Why? Do you take exception to any of those names? IIRC, they're all "scientists" who have claimed their observations precluded a belief in God.

89 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:48:11pm

re: #84 Afrocity

Thank you Sharmuta. I did not know the issues involving ID. I have heard it was conservative based, then I go to Wikipedia (which is seldom accurate anyway) and it says:

Discovery Institute, a politically conservative think tank...

Well I guess that depends upon the views of the person who did the wiki entry.

Wiki generally is edited by people centered around Daily Kos/HuffPo rhetoric.

90 MandyManners  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:48:19pm

Any gamey buttocks yet?

91 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:48:32pm

re: #77 Marvo76

It already started in CA where some text books have been "modified" to show Islam in a more favorable light. I believe they have even had Indoctrination in to how muslims worship as sort of a "social enlightenment" or culture appreciation exercise...

It is a battle with many fronts. Clowns to the left of us, and Jokers to the right.

And here we are, stuck in the middle again.

92 HelloDare  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:49:02pm

re: #79 victor_yugo

Unless your name is Carl Sagan, or Stephen Jay Gould, or Charles Darwin, or Richard Dawkins, or or or...

Yeah, those guys were and are Scientismerizers./

93 jcm  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:49:15pm

re: #90 MandyManners

Any gamey buttocks yet?

Last thread, three met Stinky in a dark alley.

94 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:49:52pm

re: #90 MandyManners

Any gamey buttocks yet?

They are still stuck in the Huckster thread, so far. (please, please, please, please!)

95 esch  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:50:01pm

re: #93 jcm

"It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue-mont"

96 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:50:23pm

re: #95 esch

"It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue-mont"

Light lamp.

97 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:50:51pm

re: #96 Walter L. Newton

Light lamp.

You need batteries.

98 HelloDare  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:51:34pm

re: #28 Marvo76

what was it Robin Wiliam's said one time "(God) I gave you this beautiful world and you fucked it up"

I think it was Christopher Hitchens.

99 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:52:31pm

re: #84 Afrocity

Indeed. You've joined us at a time there is an internal struggle for the ideals of the party. I'm a spiritual woman, thinking about converting to Catholicism, but I'm not a conservative because of my religious faith. I'm a conservative because of my ideological positions, and they don't match the democrats. I became republican in 1993.

Now- I think people in our party who think one has to be a Christian fundamentalist has a poor grasp on conservatism. Do not listen to them is my advice. If you think government should have a limited role, should spend tax payer money wisely, and sure not infringe on the rights of individuals, then welcome to the right! You and I have a similar view- I think faith is a private matter between a person and God. Or no God, if that's what they think- it's their business.

But ID proponents think it's their business to push faith, their idea of faith, onto other peoples' children. That's not conservative in any way.

100 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:52:32pm

re: #89 FurryOldGuyJeans

Wiki generally is edited by people centered around Daily Kos/HuffPo rhetoric.

Is that true or are you pulling my leg? I thought anyone could comment on wiki but you had to go through some sort of "vetting process". Though that will explain why i find most Wiki entries to be biased.

101 BryanS  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:53:34pm

"Intelligent design...it makes people stupid"

Such an awesome quote less than two minutes into the video :)

102 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:53:35pm

re: #97 FurryOldGuyJeans

You need batteries.

I've got a spare set of of C-Cells for my Mag-Light.

103 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:54:11pm

re: #86 FurryOldGuyJeans

I see the Disco folks wanting their own brand of Theocracy just as restrictive and repressive as exists in Saudi Arabia or Iran. Once they get the reins of power they won't let anyone else even close.

furry, I don't know if you are as old as I am, I think you are, do you remember how it was when we started school? Heck we still had school prayers in first and second grade, and could sing Christmas carols ( the real ones) up untill my 6th grade year. Untill the 20's I believe, a bible was still used as a class room tool and histroy as well as grammmar was taught from it in public school settings. Now a Kid can't even thank the lord that he got thru 12 years at his own graduation. Some of these folks want the pendulum to swing a bit the other way again, cept the camel(nope not gonna use it) the genie is outa the bottle. Most are now hearing that the constitution means freedom FROM religion instead of OF

104 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:54:57pm

re: #100 Afrocity

Is that true or are you pulling my leg? I thought anyone could comment on wiki but you had to go through some sort of "vetting process". Though that will explain why i find most Wiki entries to be biased.

It depends on the article, and even that process is now up for debate.

Some articles do require higher privileges to edit. The review process may soon become S.O.P. for all, or nearly all, Wikipedia articles.

105 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:54:59pm

re: #86 FurryOldGuyJeans

I see the Disco folks wanting their own brand of Theocracy just as restrictive and repressive as exists in Saudi Arabia or Iran. Once they get the reins of power they won't let anyone else even close.

This is one of the primary problems that you find with wannabe revolutionaries and their fellow travelers. They all seem to think that they are fated to end up as the leaders in the new order when in fact, they are all too likely to find themselves being paraded out to the square with the guillotine with no one left to speak for them save a later day version of Madame Thérèse Defarge.

They are always so surprised when they realize too late that the wicker basket is really just there to catch their head.

106 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:55:04pm

re: #83 victor_yugo

What kinds of laws are there against human sacrifice?

Yes. Crafty bit of legislation that.

/

107 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:55:27pm

re: #100 Afrocity

Here is a non wiki link to the Wedge Document.

However- I've read enough, and others have to, that I can say with a lot of confidence that most of the wiki articles on ID and it's tenants and proponents are well researched and accurate.

108 jcm  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:55:30pm

re: #100 Afrocity

Is that true or are you pulling my leg? I thought anyone could comment on wiki but you had to go through some sort of "vetting process". Though that will explain why i find most Wiki entries to be biased.


A memorable thread followed the discovery that Wiki describe Condi Rice as a "Concert Penist."

109 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:56:20pm

Hello Night Lizards! It's nearly Hot in Near Iowa!

Well, it's been a day! Huckabee and all!

I tried to watch the Senate on C-SPAN today, but I think they must have been in committee most of the time because I fell asleep to the classical music.

How are you-all and are we still OnT?

110 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:56:35pm

re: #100 Afrocity

Is that true or are you pulling my leg? I thought anyone could comment on wiki but you had to go through some sort of "vetting process". Though that will explain why i find most Wiki entries to be biased.

I wish I could be pulling your leg. ;)

I wish it wasn't true, but from the general tone of the articles it shows that the bulk of the articles are written and edited by people who's political philosophy is on the far left.

111 Killgore Trout  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:56:42pm

re: #90 MandyManners

I don't care what the calender says, it has to be a full moon. We've had a lot of nuts here tonight and the Craziest Blog on the Interwebz has a few new conspiracy theories; The stimulus plan is just a smokescreen for "President Hussien" to steal all the guns and there's a secret hidden provision to create an army of domestic leftist sympathizers larger than the US military.

112 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:57:00pm

re: #100 Afrocity

Is that true or are you pulling my leg? I thought anyone could comment on wiki but you had to go through some sort of "vetting process". Though that will explain why i find most Wiki entries to be biased.

It's true, anyone can contribute to wiki. It would be impossible for every page to be vetted.

113 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:57:31pm

re: #111 Killgore Trout

It was last night. But I've noticed the nuts come out usually the night after a full moon. It's like a delayed reaction, or something.

114 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:57:50pm

re: #110 FurryOldGuyJeans

I wish I could be pulling your leg. ;)

I wish it wasn't true, but from the general tone of the articles it shows that the bulk of the articles are written and edited by people who's political philosophy is on the far left.

doing the work the rest of us don't have time to do --we have jobs.

115 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:59:00pm

Here's the real question... Afrocity- how much do you know about evolution?

116 BryanS  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:59:23pm

re: #109 ggt

Hello Night Lizards! It's nearly Hot in Near Iowa!

Well, it's been a day! Huckabee and all!

I tried to watch the Senate on C-SPAN today, but I think they must have been in committee most of the time because I fell asleep to the classical music.

How are you-all and are we still OnT?

Hmmm. Wasn't global warming supposed to end, ocean levels fall, and peace come over the land once The One™ became president?

117 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:59:43pm

I am watching this on the tube now, but the reception goes in and out. I suspect it's sabotage by the Disco Dewds.
/

Oh yeah, and Ken Miller is a bad ass.

118 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:59:50pm

re: #113 Sharmuta

It was last night. But I've noticed the nuts come out usually the night after a full moon. It's like a delayed reaction, or something.

That's how the word Lunacy came into being.

119 lobo91  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 8:59:56pm

re: #111 Killgore Trout

...there's a secret hidden provision to create an army of domestic leftist sympathizers larger than the US military.

Not sure how there could be a "secret hidden provision" in a document. It's either there or it isn't.

People are always talking about "secret Executive Orders," as well. If you can't show it to anyone because it's secret, what good is it?

120 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:00:13pm

re: #99 Sharmuta

Indeed. You've joined us at a time there is an internal struggle for the ideals of the party. I'm a spiritual woman, thinking about converting to Catholicism, but I'm not a conservative because of my religious faith. I'm a conservative because of my ideological positions, and they don't match the democrats. I became republican in 1993.

Now- I think people in our party who think one has to be a Christian fundamentalist has a poor grasp on conservatism. Do not listen to them is my advice. If you think government should have a limited role, should spend tax payer money wisely, and sure not infringe on the rights of individuals, then welcome to the right! You and I have a similar view- I think faith is a private matter between a person and God. Or no God, if that's what they think- it's their business.

But ID proponents think it's their business to push faith, their idea of faith, onto other peoples' children. That's not conservative in any way.


(smiling) Thanks Sharmuta.

This snippet from your quote: If you think government should have a limited role, should spend tax payer money wisely, and sure not infringe on the rights of individuals, then welcome to the right!

Really hit home. Those are my views. I did have a misconception of conservatives from my 10 year stint in Texas. Last year I recognized that not all conservatives are religious.

121 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:00:22pm

re: #100 Afrocity

Is that true or are you pulling my leg? I thought anyone could comment on wiki but you had to go through some sort of "vetting process". Though that will explain why i find most Wiki entries to be biased.

Wikipedia editors are just like any other internet community, and they have political leanings. Overall the internet tends to be more left leaning. You can see this on more 'bohemian', semi to non-moderated forums as well, such as YouTube, or metacritic.

There was a story years ago though, that something like 40% of all wikipedia edits originate from IPs that map to 'corporations' as well. I like having it as a resource for pop culture, or any article that is easily fact checkable elsewhere on the internet. For anything controversial, or subject to analysis, it is definitely an enter at your own risk resource.

122 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:00:31pm

re: #115 Sharmuta

Here's the real question... Afrocity- how much do you know about evolution?

Psst... Sharm...
We are we going to tell her about the turtles?
;-P

123 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:00:32pm

re: #113 Sharmuta

It was last night. But I've noticed the nuts come out usually the night after a full moon. It's like a delayed reaction, or something.

I have a feeling, call it a hunch if you will, that Thursday is going to be fun here. A real whack a troll marathon.

I have lost my Al Pastor recipe. Dang and blast.

124 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:00:40pm

re: #116 BryanS

Hmmm. Wasn't global warming supposed to end, ocean levels fall, and peace come over the land once The One™ became president?

He still has to clean up bush's debris first before the trumpets sound from above///

125 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:00:58pm

re: #116 BryanS

Hmmm. Wasn't global warming supposed to end, ocean levels fall, and peace come over the land once The One™ became president?

It's a conundrum!

(wrapped in an enigma)

126 lobo91  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:01:18pm

re: #116 BryanS

Hmmm. Wasn't global warming supposed to end, ocean levels fall, and peace come over the land once The One™ became president?

I don't know about peace or the oceans, but global warming has definitely ended here in Denver. It's snowing its ass off.

127 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:01:52pm

re: #120 Afrocity

Last year I recognized that not all conservatives are religious.

Good girl!

128 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:02:14pm

re: #120 Afrocity

(smiling) Thanks Sharmuta.

This snippet from your quote: If you think government should have a limited role, should spend tax payer money wisely, and sure not infringe on the rights of individuals, then welcome to the right!

Really hit home. Those are my views. I did have a misconception of conservatives from my 10 year stint in Texas. Last year I recognized that not all conservatives are religious.

I think a lot more people would consider themselves conservative if not for the whacky religious element identifying themselves as such.

129 Attaboid  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:02:24pm

Do apes have bigger ears than chimpanzees?
Does it Make a difference?

130 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:02:33pm

re: #122 JCM

I was leaving that for you and Syrah! Far be it from me to spoil you two's fun. ;P

131 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:02:51pm

re: #128 ggt

I think a lot more people would consider themselves conservative if not for the whacky religious element identifying themselves as such.

DING DING DING!

132 victor_yugo  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:03:14pm

re: #120 Afrocity

Last year I recognized that not all conservatives are religious.

And vice-versa. In fact, many liberal busybodies try to mask their intentions under "religion."

133 Killgore Trout  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:03:16pm

re: #119 lobo91

It's a section of the bill regarding government contractors. What makes it "secret" is the imaginary interpretation.

134 esch  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:03:17pm

re: #99 Sharmuta

Now- I think people in our party who think one has to be a Christian fundamentalist has a poor grasp on conservatism. Do not listen to them is my advice. If you think government should have a limited role, should spend tax payer money wisely, and sure not infringe on the rights of individuals, then welcome to the right! You and I have a similar view- I think faith is a private matter between a person and God. Or no God, if that's what they think- it's their business.

Far too many Republicans believe the former rather than the latter. I believe this excludes many potential Republican conservatives. Such as myself.

Why should I support those who despise me slightly less than the D's?

135 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:03:21pm

re: #120 Afrocity

(smiling) Thanks Sharmuta.

This snippet from your quote: If you think government should have a limited role, should spend tax payer money wisely, and sure not infringe on the rights of individuals, then welcome to the right!

Really hit home. Those are my views. I did have a misconception of conservatives from my 10 year stint in Texas. Last year I recognized that not all conservatives are religious.

All true Conservatives are religious, even the Agnostics and Atheists. They just are not the FMSM stereotypical Bible Thumper.

136 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:03:49pm

re: #120 Afrocity

(smiling) Thanks Sharmuta.

This snippet from your quote: If you think government should have a limited role, should spend tax payer money wisely, and sure not infringe on the rights of individuals, then welcome to the right!

Really hit home. Those are my views. I did have a misconception of conservatives from my 10 year stint in Texas. Last year I recognized that not all conservatives are religious.

And not all right wing religious gun nut conservative support creationism!

137 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:03:50pm

re: #115 Sharmuta

Here's the real question... Afrocity- how much do you know about evolution?

Sharmuta,

I will not lie. Not much.
I know history like a fox but this is something I am out of my depth on.
When Palin was bashed on her views by the left, I became defensive but realized I could not defend her because I don't have a grasp of the argument. I am the same on stem cell research.

138 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:04:11pm

re: #130 Sharmuta

I was leaving that for you and Syrah! Far be it from me to spoil you two's fun. ;P

LOL!

139 BryanS  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:04:55pm

re: #126 lobo91

I don't know about peace or the oceans, but global warming has definitely ended here in Denver. It's snowing its ass off.

Heh. Here in Wisconsin, after our unseasonably warm day today (almost didn't need a jacket) we're supposed to get snow in the next day or so.

140 lobo91  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:05:14pm

re: #133 Killgore Trout

It's a section of the bill regarding government contractors. What makes it "secret" is the imaginary interpretation.

Ah. That explains it. I'm all out of tinfoil...

141 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:05:25pm

re: #129 Attaboid

Do apes have bigger ears than chimpanzees?
Does it Make a difference?

speaking of monkeys. . . did you see the new addition to the Smitsonian Zoo? Momma looks very happy.

The full article is on zooborns.com front page.

142 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:05:33pm

OT from Drudge:

'Painful Lessons': Abuse At Chicago Schools
Hundreds Of Kids Beaten, Whipped, Even Choked By Teachers, Coaches

Treveon Martin, 10, is one of at least 818 Chicago Public School students, since 2003, to allege being battered by a teacher or other staff member.

cbs2chicago.com

Is this part of hopie or changie?

143 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:06:54pm

re: #122 JCM

Psst... Sharm...
We are we going to tell her about the turtles?
;-P

The initiates must first freely inquire on there own before the truth, the glory, and the majesty of the Infinite Turtle Stack can be revealed to them.

When this one is ready for enlightenment, she will ask.

144 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:06:56pm

re: #142 sngnsgt

OT from Drudge:

'Painful Lessons': Abuse At Chicago Schools
Hundreds Of Kids Beaten, Whipped, Even Choked By Teachers, Coaches

cbs2chicago.com

Is this part of hopie or changie?

The Chicago school chief has been moved up to Sec. Ed. by Obama.

145 BryanS  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:07:38pm

re: #128 ggt

I think a lot more people would consider themselves conservative if not for the whacky religious element identifying themselves as such.

Hence, we have the reason the media focuses on the the religious elements of the party. That kind of focus makes it easier for liberal media to ridicule conservatives and make them seem extreme.

146 esch  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:07:41pm

re: #144 JCM

The Chicago school chief has been moved up to Sec. Re-Ed. by Obama.

FTFY

147 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:07:55pm

re: #143 Syrah

The initiates must first freely inquire on there own before the truth, the glory, and the majesty of the Infinite Turtle Stack can be revealed to them.

When this one is ready for enlightenment, she will ask.

Does that go for the weekly Zionist check as well?

148 lobo91  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:08:26pm

re: #144 JCM

The Chicago school chief has been moved up to Sec. Ed. by Obama.

I guess that makes it change, then.

149 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:08:31pm

re: #137 Afrocity

Well- another thing you will come to learn about me is I'm quick to recommend a good book or two. The best book I can recommend to help you better understand not just evolution, but ID from a scientist's perspective is Only A Theory, by Ken Miller, who is also in the video posted above, as he was an expert witness for the plaintiffs.

And don't worry- I wasn't very knowledgeable about evolution either until Charles started doing these threads, and I started looking into the science. I didn't doubt it, but I also wasn't familiar with the stunning amount of information concerning it. You strike me as having an inquisitive and intelligent mind, so I trust if you look into it, you'll come to understand it better.

150 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:08:55pm

re: #142 sngnsgt

Uh I wonder if it is the first time in their lives, some of these kids actually got dicipline?

151 Yankee Division Son  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:09:12pm

"One might say, for example, that the reason the Boston Red Sox were able to come back from three games down against the New York Yankees was because god was tired of George Stienbrenner, and wanted the Red Sox to win. Where I come from, you'd be surprised at how many people think that's a perfectly reasonable explanation for what happened, and you know it might be true, but it's certainly not science."

Now there's a thought experiment.

152 Killgore Trout  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:09:51pm

OT: A very lucky baby...
Salma Hayek breastfeeds African baby in Sierra Leone

153 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:10:00pm

re: #148 lobo91

I guess that makes it change, then.

Ayers -> CAC -> Chicago Schools -> School Administrator -> Now Sec. Ed.

154 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:10:00pm

re: #142 sngnsgt

OT from Drudge:

'Painful Lessons': Abuse At Chicago Schools
Hundreds Of Kids Beaten, Whipped, Even Choked By Teachers, Coaches

cbs2chicago.com

Is this part of hopie or changie?

Thats nothing, I live in Chicago. Last week we had a 10 year old "hang himself" in a bathroom stall. Many feel the teacher did it accidentally but coroner ruled it a suicide (developing). Obama did nothing for Illinois. Why he was elected to POTUS baffles me.

155 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:10:17pm

re: #151 Yankee Division Son

PFFFT! Sports.

156 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:10:25pm

re: #147 FurryOldGuyJeans

Does that go for the weekly Zionist check as well?

No, that is something you get once you prove yourself to not be a troll, or at least, that was the reason given to me for the long delay before the first check gets sent out.

You have received your first check by now haven't you?

157 Killgore Trout  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:10:30pm

re: #152 Killgore Trout

Yes, it's probably safe for work.

158 NJDhockeyfan  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:10:49pm

re: #144 JCM

The Chicago school chief has been moved up to Sec. Ed. by Obama.

Has he paid his taxes?

159 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:11:54pm

re: #152 Killgore Trout


NEXT!

160 lobo91  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:12:05pm

re: #158 NJDhockeyfan

Has he paid his taxes?

Racist!

///

161 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:12:21pm

re: #144 JCM

The Chicago school chief has been moved up to Sec. Ed. by Obama.

Normal Chicago advancing of cronies. Weather or not the crony is competent is irrelevant. The issue is putting your friends in a position to gain power and money. So it has (not) worked in Chicago for over 100 years.

162 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:12:23pm

re: #158 NJDhockeyfan

Has he paid his taxes?

I seriously expect O to nominate the next nitwit he finds that actually paid their taxes for some cabinet position, qualifications be damned.

163 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:12:58pm

re: #149 Sharmuta

And one thing everyone is (probably) very tired about me is:

Please add that book recommendation to the BOOK CATEGORY of the Spin-off links with an Amazon.com link. It is handy for future reference AND any purchases made from the Amazon link count towards the tip jar for Charles.

BOOK CATEGORY PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT OFF.

164 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:12:59pm

re: #149 Sharmuta

I got $36 bucks left on my Amazon gift card...consider the book bought.
I teach graduate students, so it would be interesting to read about the pedagogical implications of the issue.

165 Killgore Trout  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:13:11pm

re: #157 Killgore Trout

I've always had a crush on her. She was great in Dusk Till Dawn.

166 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:13:43pm

re: #163 ggt

You can add the book too, you know. ;)

167 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:13:44pm

re: #154 Afrocity

Jeez, I still don't get it either.

168 Attaboid  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:13:58pm

Whether the weather changes or not, I will dress warmly.

169 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:14:10pm

re: #140 lobo91

Ah. That explains it. I'm all out of tinfoil...

A Bill doesn't have to detail specifically how it will be implemented. It can pass into law with much vagueness, and when provisions are drawn up on how that law will actually be enforced or implemented it can radically alter what the Bill seems like it is supporting.

I'm sure you have seen the Stealth Creationist laws that Charles has been posting. While some aren't exactly that 'Stealth', most do couch their intent in language that masks what the law will actually entail in the real world once passed.

So, yes, the tinfoil crowd is talking about what a provision of the Bill might actually mean. It is unfortunate that our legislative bodies actually operate this way though, and allow Bills to pass without first going to committee to discuss the brass tacks of it.

170 lobo91  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:14:23pm

re: #162 FurryOldGuyJeans

I seriously expect O to nominate the next nitwit he finds that actually paid their taxes for some cabinet position, qualifications be damned.

Considering the (lack of) qualifications of most of the one's he's already nominated, that might actually be an improvement.

171 NJDhockeyfan  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:14:45pm

re: #162 FurryOldGuyJeans

I seriously expect O to nominate the next nitwit he finds that actually paid their taxes for some cabinet position, qualifications be damned.

I haven't seen many who are qualified for their positions so far.

172 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:14:49pm

re: #164 Afrocity

Awesome!

173 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:14:54pm

re: #154 Afrocity

Why are you in Chicago? It's much better out where I am. (The Very Far Western Suburbs of Chicagoland a/k/a Near Iowa).

174 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:14:56pm

re: #154 Afrocity

Thats nothing, I live in Chicago. Last week we had a 10 year old "hang himself" in a bathroom stall. Many feel the teacher did it accidentally but coroner ruled it a suicide (developing). Obama did nothing for Illinois. Why he was elected to POTUS baffles me.

The same thing happened with WJC, the people of Arkansas were more than glad to get rid of him.

175 Charles Johnson  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:15:02pm

Here come the down-dingers.

176 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:15:07pm

re: #165 Killgore Trout

I've always had a crush on her. She was great in Dusk Till Dawn.

I LOVE THAT MOVIE

177 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:15:27pm

re: #97 FurryOldGuyJeans

You need batteries.

Light lamp.

178 MarineGrunt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:16:01pm

Saw it on PBS Channel 13, NY. It sure opened my eyes about the wedge and DI.

179 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:16:06pm

re: #177 Walter L. Newton

Light lamp.

YOU need batteries. ;)

180 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:16:08pm

re: #156 Syrah

No, that is something you get once you prove yourself to not be a troll, or at least, that was the reason given to me for the long delay before the first check gets sent out.

You have received your first check by now haven't you?

I get a special commission for the Book Category profits.

:)

181 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:16:45pm

re: #166 Sharmuta

I know, but I've not read it --seems wrong.

182 Killgore Trout  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:17:00pm

re: #176 Afrocity

I was lucky that when I saw it I didn't know anything about it. I don't think I've ever been so surprised by a plot twist before.

183 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:17:07pm

re: #175 Charles

Here come the down-dingers.

Careful Charles, Phatcoder down dinged ya, he's one of those big bad hackers... Wooo.

184 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:17:17pm

I have it on good authority that psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them; no matter how crazy they are.

185 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:17:36pm

re: #181 ggt

Read it! It's not a difficult book to understand. The science involved is quite easy.

186 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:17:47pm

re: #179 FurryOldGuyJeans

YOU need batteries. ;)

What RPG game are you trying to play?

RPG = Role Playing Game

187 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:18:01pm

re: #179 FurryOldGuyJeans

YOU need batteries. ;)

I'm sorry, I posted that comment 20 minutes ago and forgot and went to the store. I just got back.

188 hopperandadropper  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:18:09pm

re: #30 Dark_Falcon

Never cared much for Phil Collins, but Peter Gabriel is the Man. Solsbury Hill alone is better than the entire career output of most artists.

189 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:18:27pm

re: #173 ggt

Why are you in Chicago? It's much better out where I am. (The Very Far Western Suburbs of Chicagoland a/k/a Near Iowa).

I go to Ames, Iowa often.

I do not know how to drive so I have to stay in urban areas. When I worked on the McCain campaign, I did a lot of calls to Iowa..because Chicago was a wash.

190 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:18:58pm

re: #184 Scion9

I have it on good authority that psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them; no matter how crazy they are.

True, but moonbats' heads explode when exposed to the sunlight of truth. We see it all the time here.

191 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:19:07pm

re: #185 Sharmuta

Read it! It's not a difficult book to understand. The science involved is quite easy.

I will, when I finish the stacks I have :)

(but put it in the links so I won't forget)

192 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:19:20pm

re: #150 Marvo76

Is that what they call it these days?

193 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:19:40pm

re: #187 Walter L. Newton

I'm sorry, I posted that comment 20 minutes ago and forgot and went to the store. I just got back.

How could you go to the store when you need batteries? Ain't got no power, you know. ;)

194 solomonpanting  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:19:48pm

Intelligent Design on Trial

Here's ID I agree with...and she's Israeli.

195 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:19:58pm

re: #189 Afrocity

oh, Aurora has great bus and cab service. And, the train actually comes out this far too!

196 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:20:13pm

re: #193 FurryOldGuyJeans

How could you go to the store when you need batteries? Ain't got no power, you know. ;)

I went to the store to get batteries.

197 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:21:09pm

re: #186 Dark_Falcon

What RPG game are you trying to play?

RPG = Role Playing Game

Variant of Zork, if you really must know.

Just don't say, "Hello Sailor"!

198 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:21:21pm

re: #188 hopperandadropper

Never cared much for Phil Collins, but Peter Gabriel is the Man. Solsbury Hill alone is better than the entire career output of most artists.

I agree with you about Solsbury Hill, but not about Phil Collins. In the Air Tonight is still one of my favorite songs to sing, since I can actually do it some justice (though I'm not nearly as good as Collins).

199 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:22:40pm

re: #191 ggt

I will, when I finish the stacks I have :)

(but put it in the links so I won't forget)

Alright! I added not just Only A Theory, but Monkey Girl too.

200 ASU86PE  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:23:02pm

re: #50 Afrocity

re: #59 Sharmuta

Most of us at LGF accept evolution.

But not all of us. It is true that the biblical view has had a tough time regaining acceptance in the state schools. But that's nothing new.

Anyways, Keep the Faith and be open-minded about some of the opinions at this site. Some are vile; some are sharp; some are dull. Remember, Romans 10:17 "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. "

201 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:23:42pm

re: #195 ggt

I go to the outlet mall there in Aurora.
Hoosier said we should have a Chicago meetup.
That would be great because I want to see if we can unseat mayor Daley and this new Gov. Quinn. Republicans are hard to find in Chicago. My group was only 5 during the campaign.

202 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:24:00pm

re: #197 FurryOldGuyJeans

Variant of Zork, if you really must know.

Just don't say, "Hello Sailor"!

Cool. I know a fair number of RPG players, so I knew what you were up to. Fun to read, though. :)

203 Wishing  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:24:24pm

I just finished watching Judgment Day, and I gotta say, That was awesome!

204 BryanS  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:24:38pm

re: #197 FurryOldGuyJeans

Variant of Zork, if you really must know.

Just don't say, "Hello Sailor"!

Wow. Zork. Brings me back to the first computer I played on. Commodore 64
LOAD"*",8,1
Ahh...memories :)

205 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:25:12pm

re: #201 Afrocity

I go to the outlet mall there in Aurora.
Hoosier said we should have a Chicago meetup.
That would be great because I want to see if we can unseat mayor Daley and this new Gov. Quinn. Republicans are hard to find in Chicago. My group was only 5 during the campaign.

Where would we meet? Someplace downtown?

206 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:25:30pm

re: #185 Sharmuta

Now you can yell at me for not putting something in the book links.

there is a series of science books for non-majors written by "famous" scientists called The Science Masters Series published by Basic Books. They are short and easy to get thru. As usual, I own more than I've read. The one by Richard Dawkins was called River out of Eden in which he tries to explain evolution.

I haven't read his subsequent work, but I can't remember anything in this book that turned me off, I thought it was well written and interesting.

207 Kosh's Shadow  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:25:41pm

re: #200 ASU86PE

re: #59 Sharmuta

But not all of us. It is true that the biblical view has had a tough time regaining acceptance in the state schools. But that's nothing new.

Anyways, Keep the Faith and be open-minded about some of the opinions at this site. Some are vile; some are sharp; some are dull. Remember, Romans 10:17 "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. "

This actually shows the problem. Why should the biblical view, which, by definition is based on religon, have acceptance in state schools, which are required NOT to establish a religion?
If the Judeo-Christian Bible is discussed in school, why not the Hindu, Native American, and all other religious models not get discussed? If one is picked, but not all, doesn't that establish that religion?

208 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:25:49pm

re: #204 BryanS

Wow. Zork. Brings me back to the first computer I played on. Commodore 64
LOAD"*",8,1
Ahh...memories :)

C=64 was high tech compared to some the things I learned on in school.

209 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:25:54pm

re: #200 ASU86PE

But not all of us.

Right- which is why I said "most" and not "all".

It is true that the biblical view has had a tough time regaining acceptance in the state schools. But that's nothing new.

And it's not going to because it's not science.

210 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:26:11pm

re: #198 Dark_Falcon

I agree with you about Solsbury Hill, but not about Phil Collins. In the Air Tonight is still one of my favorite songs to sing, since I can actually do it some justice (though I'm not nearly as good as Collins).

I like Phil Collins as a lead for Genesis better than Peter Gabriel. But Peter is better as a solo act IMHO. I love Shock The Money.

211 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:27:13pm

re: #199 Sharmuta

Alright! I added not just Only A Theory, but Monkey Girl too.

You are sooo awesome!

212 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:27:36pm

re: #211 ggt

Awww, shucks!

213 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:28:01pm

re: #210 Afrocity

I like Phil Collins as a lead for Genesis better than Peter Gabriel. But Peter is better as a solo act IMHO. I love Shock The Money.

I can understand that. Especially since "Turn It On Again" is another song I like.

214 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:28:09pm

re: #200 ASU86PE

Hard to get religious dogma accepted as science, unless you are in Saudi Arabia or Iran.

215 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:28:14pm

re: #84 Afrocity

Thank you Sharmuta. I did not know the issues involving ID. I have heard it was conservative based, then I go to Wikipedia (which is seldom accurate anyway) and it says:

Discovery Institute, a politically conservative think tank...

Well I guess that depends upon the views of the person who did the wiki entry.

FWIW, I do not consider the DI to be conservative, not by any means, not in any way.

The fact that they use dishonest tactics to subvert the U.S. Constitution, and use American school children as pawns in achieving their goals, makes them no different than the communists and leftists that do the same. There is nothing politically conservative about the Discovery Institute.

216 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:28:17pm

re: #200 ASU86PE

re: #59 Sharmuta

But not all of us. It is true that the biblical view has had a tough time regaining acceptance in the state schools. But that's nothing new.

Anyways, Keep the Faith and be open-minded about some of the opinions at this site. Some are vile; some are sharp; some are dull. Remember, Romans 10:17 "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. "

I believe in the Word of God. His word is a spiritual guide.
I know evolution to be supported by multidisciplinary evidence for the physical world and the life therein. It is a description of the physical world.

I don't see a conflict between the two.

217 Killgore Trout  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:28:48pm

re: #208 FurryOldGuyJeans

There's a zork revival on the way; Legends of Zork. I doubt they'll be able to capture the magic of the original but it's nice to see the game is still loved.

218 Wishing  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:28:48pm

re: #209 Sharmuta

And it's not going to because it's not science.

Scripture is not, nor was it intended to be, imo, a science book or a history book or any other label you want to stick on it.
It is the Word of God to mankind. Period.
To artificially try to jam it into some hole like just another peg is ridiculous.

219 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:29:02pm

re: #210 Afrocity

"So" is one of the best albums ever made. IMHO

220 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:29:44pm

re: #205 Dark_Falcon

Place has not been picked yet. I have a apt, in hi-rise with Party room and hot tub. Nice for a pot luck sort of thing that we can actually talk. Public places here are full of Obots. Gotta be careful.

221 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:29:56pm

re: #11 Dark_Falcon

fixed. But seriously, when people turn to the destruction of other people's speech, I turn against the destroyers. I've seen the world they want to build and I don't want to live in it!

Yeah. Those mural-burners remind me of the Taliban shellers of the Bamiyan Buddhas.

222 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:30:41pm

re: #207 Kosh's Shadow

This actually shows the problem. Why should the biblical view, which, by definition is based on religon, have acceptance in state schools, which are required NOT to establish a religion?
If the Judeo-Christian Bible is discussed in school, why not the Hindu, Native American, and all other religious models not get discussed? If one is picked, but not all, doesn't that establish that religion?

I have no problem with the Bible being discussed in an elective comparative religions class, or in the context of a history class, or literature class as far discussing the influence the Bible has had, but the line is drawn at teaching the Bible as an agenda to indoctrinate kids.

223 Kosh's Shadow  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:31:55pm

re: #222 Sharmuta

I have no problem with the Bible being discussed in an elective comparative religions class, or in the context of a history class, or literature class as far discussing the influence the Bible has had, but the line is drawn at teaching the Bible as an agenda to indoctrinate kids.

I agree. I left out that I was concerned about teaching the Bible as science.

224 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:32:18pm
225 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:32:24pm

re: #223 Kosh's Shadow

I figured, and that context is why I gave you an upding. :)

226 Killian Bundy  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:32:35pm
eat american soldier usa

/well, now there's a search string you don't want to find in your blog's stats

227 BryanS  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:32:49pm

re: #220 Afrocity

Place has not been picked yet. I have a apt, in hi-rise with Party room and hot tub. Nice for a pot luck sort of thing that we can actually talk. Public places here are full of Obots. Gotta be careful.

Sounds an awful lot like the People's Republic of Madison where I live :)

228 Wishing  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:33:11pm

Believe me, if the Almighty wanted Scripture to be a science book, He would have put in all the detail we needed. When it came to building the Tabernacle, the details are done to the minutest.
Scripture is not scientific., and it is just about blasphemy to reduce it to such.
(again, imo)

229 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:33:25pm

re: #217 Killgore Trout

There's a zork revival on the way; Legends of Zork. I doubt they'll be able to capture the magic of the original but it's nice to see the game is still loved.

I do occasionally find myself playing the last two Zork PC game incarnations when I get bored, especially Zork: Grand Inquisitor. Erick Avari as Mir Yannick, the Grand Inquisitor is a hoot. "I am so the Boss of you!"

230 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:34:06pm

re: #192 sngnsgt

that's what we called in my house when I was growing up...

231 Lynn B.  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:34:50pm

re: #219 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

"So" is one of the best albums ever made. IMHO

Yeah, it is. But no better than PG, PG(II), PG(III) and PG(IV) (a/k/a/ "Security"). All genius. Never get tired of any of 'em.

232 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:35:26pm

re: #220 Afrocity

Place has not been picked yet. I have a apt, in hi-rise with Party room and hot tub. Nice for a pot luck sort of thing that we can actually talk. Public places here are full of Obots. Gotta be careful.

Seattle, that's sounds so much like Seattle.

233 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:36:34pm

re: #221 Salamantis

Yeah. Those mural-burners remind me of the Taliban shellers of the Bamiyan Buddhas.

Agreed. The solution to speech you don't like is your own speech. The mural burning was done by someone who, like bin Laden and Stalin, was convinced that he possessed the Absolute Truth and and that what he knew was all that needed to be known. From that perspective, someone who disagrees is not just wrong but a deceiver who must be stopped. Such a person may convince himself that he's doing God's Work but I know who they are really working for. I'll let Mick Jagger make the introduction:

234 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:36:44pm

re: #230 Marvo76

Ahh, I get it. ;-)

235 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:36:56pm

re: #32 Afrocity

What is the Conservative position? I remember Bush thinking that it was fine to teach creationism in school alongside evolution.

Bush "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes..."

"Teach the controversy" is a Wedge Strategy tactic employed by Disco Institute shills in order to try to shoehorn any dogmatic claptrap they want into public high school science class simply by first fabricating a manufactured controversy from their incessant whining, and then claiming that their bitchiong and moaning constitutes a controversy that must be taught:

[Link: ase.tufts.edu...]

excerpt:

"...the proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.

Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details."

236 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:37:02pm

re: #219 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

FBV- "So" is a great album. Oh, the 80's. I love Synchronicity by the Police too.
IMO a great album is one in which I love every song. Like RIO by Duran Duran, or Songs in the Key of Life. Nevermind-Nirvana.

237 Wishing  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:37:39pm

re: #220 Afrocity

Place has not been picked yet. I have a apt, in hi-rise with Party room and hot tub. Nice for a pot luck sort of thing that we can actually talk. Public places here are full of Obots. Gotta be careful.

Now, this is the kind of talking that makes me crazy. What, are we supposed to have secret conversations, out of the hearing of Obama supporters?
If this is the case, our country is already lost.
Screw em! Get right up in their faces and say whatever you want to say!

238 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:37:40pm

re: #201 Afrocity

I go to the outlet mall there in Aurora.
Hoosier said we should have a Chicago meetup.
That would be great because I want to see if we can unseat mayor Daley and this new Gov. Quinn. Republicans are hard to find in Chicago. My group was only 5 during the campaign.

Well, the meet-up will have to be in the 'burbs, 'cause I don't come down to the city very often (it tends to be a whole day event with the drive and all). I think the only way Daley will be unseated is if Chicago doesn't get the Olympics.

239 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:38:22pm

re: #77 Marvo76

It already started in CA where some text books have been "modified" to show Islam in a more favorable light. I believe they have even had Indoctrination in to how muslims worship as sort of a "social enlightenment" or culture appreciation exercise...

Link? I've not seen this in the Bay Area.

240 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:38:44pm

re: #232 FurryOldGuyJeans

Seattle, that's sounds so much like Seattle.

Anytime I go into Seattle I make sure I wear my USS Ronald Reagan hat.
I relish the glares I get.

241 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:40:24pm

re: #236 Afrocity

"Songs in the Key of Life"? Fuggetaboutit! Like buttah!

242 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:41:08pm
243 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:41:25pm

re: #232 FurryOldGuyJeans

Seattle, that's sounds so much like Seattle.

It can be worse. My dad and I are too big to be easy to mess with so we don't get physical threats when we talk from a conservative standpoint. But I have caught the wrong end of moonbat shrieks from time to time. I tend not to engage, but on the rare occasions that I do reply, I have had some success backing the moonbats off through sheer volume. I have a very strong voice and am almost impossible to shout down.

244 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:41:36pm

re: #232 FurryOldGuyJeans

Seattle, that's sounds so much like Seattle.

furry,

I live two block from Grant Park where the BIG OBAMA night took place. I was probably the only black person in Chicago in bed crying that night because McCain lost (it even hurts just to type about it now). Helicopters were flying outside my apartment and I took a xanax chased with a glass of shiraz and went to bed. When Indiana went blue I knew it was over. (ahhh, it still burns)

245 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:41:48pm

re: #33 Cato the Elder

Here's a question that's been bothering me: How could we prevent "religions" like $cientology that are really nothing but money-making scams from taking advantage of the tax exemption for churches, without discriminating against legitimate religion, even if they're wacky?

Couldn't there be a law written to prevent this kind of abuse? By, say, making it illegal to charge gobs of money for "religious initiation" and the like?

Quid dicetis, O lacerti?

Nope. That would violate the 1st Amendment, by favoring some religions over others. besides which, it is open to personal-bias-grounded abuse.

Dubya stated that he didn't believe that 'witchcraft', meaning Paganism, was a religion. We Pagans had to fight in courtfor a decade just to win the right for fallen Pagan US military personnel who had either given their last full measure of devotion for their country on the battlefield of war, or had served and retired honorably, to be buried in US military cemetaries under headstones bearing the symbols of their faith:

[Link: www.paganvets.org...]

246 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:41:58pm

re: #240 JCM

Anytime I go into Seattle I make sure I wear my USS Ronald Reagan hat.
I relish the glares I get.

I prefer doing a pre-frontal lobotomy on my self by shoving frozen peas up my nose to going to Seattle.

247 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:42:52pm

re: #244 Afrocity

furry,

I live two block from Grant Park where the BIG OBAMA night took place. I was probably the only black person in Chicago in bed crying that night because McCain lost (it even hurts just to type about it now). Helicopters were flying outside my apartment and I took a xanax chased with a glass of shiraz and went to bed. When Indiana went blue I knew it was over. (ahhh, it still burns)

You sound like you need a big hug and massage. :)

{hugs}

248 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:43:00pm
249 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:44:22pm

re: #246 FurryOldGuyJeans

I prefer doing a pre-frontal lobotomy on my self by shoving frozen peas up my nose to going to Seattle.

That feels really good in the summer.

250 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:44:29pm

re: #47 Marvo76

there are some mysteries that are reserved for God, seems like I heard that in a sermon once...

Maybe. But the only way to find out if a particular problem is actually a cosmic mystery is to try to solve it.

251 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:44:56pm

re: #237 Wishing

Now, this is the kind of talking that makes me crazy. What, are we supposed to have secret conversations, out of the hearing of Obama supporters?
If this is the case, our country is already lost.
Screw em! Get right up in their faces and say whatever you want to say!

Umm, maybe you should take a look at Chicagoans against Obama: [Link: chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com...]

It gets real UGLY here.
That site has some of the ugliness.
I am on the down low after death threats and my dog was poisoned.

252 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:44:58pm

re: #246 FurryOldGuyJeans

I prefer doing a pre-frontal lobotomy on my self by shoving frozen peas up my nose to going to Seattle.

ROFL! Gotta take the kids to the Dr. sometime!

253 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:46:18pm

re: #251 Afrocity

Umm, maybe you should take a look at Chicagoans against Obama: [Link: chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com...]

It gets real UGLY here.
That site has some of the ugliness.
I am on the down low after death threats and my dog was poisoned.

I am so sorry.

254 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:47:27pm

re: #50 Afrocity

Gracias.

I have issues that I think I am strong about. This one is new to me along with stem cell research. IE something I do not have a firm opinion on.

On instinct I feel if you teach a child one view you should teach the other. I remember when Sarah Palin began to run many liberals I knew where up in arms about her being a creationist and asked how could I support her. I am of the opinion that your religion or belief system is your business as long as it does not interfere with your job in office. I am for separation of church and state. During the debates I thought Sarah made it clear that she did not let her faith or beliefs cloud her judgment as far as her position as governor.
I was fine with that answer.

If one 'view' is a theory in empirical science that is supported by reams of evidence and the other 'view' is a contention of dogmatic religion that lacks even a single shred of empirical evidence support, only the first of them belongs in public high school science class.

255 BryanS  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:47:51pm

re: #251 Afrocity

Umm, maybe you should take a look at Chicagoans against Obama: [Link: chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com...]

It gets real UGLY here.
That site has some of the ugliness.
I am on the down low after death threats and my dog was poisoned.

The left can get really nasty I wouldn't blame you for being cautious. Conservatives have noted it before, but hard core leftists can be some of the most intolerant people.

256 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:47:52pm

re: #242 buzzsawmonkey

NO WAY Obama eats there. Are you kidding me?

When I worked on the McCain campaign we basically ad to use someone's office and pretend we were working on Green Peace. i shit you not. Then we took the phone list to our respective homes and did the calling.

257 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:48:41pm

re: #251 Afrocity

Umm, maybe you should take a look at Chicagoans against Obama: [Link: chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com...]

It gets real UGLY here.
That site has some of the ugliness.
I am on the down low after death threats and my dog was poisoned.

I am glad you found a better place to "hang out". :)

258 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:49:25pm

Apropos of nothing much, I found a Chick tract about the evils of Catholicism today, stuck into a freebie newspaper rack. I had no idea that Mary was secretly 'the Masonic Isis'. Or that IHS stood for "Isis, Horus, Set".

/

259 So?  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:49:29pm

"Looking down upon earth, two angels agreed upon a research program.
One was to count all the truly self-enlightened human beings on earth,
while the other was to number the self-deluded. The angel counting the
wise individuals was through within a few minutes. The other angel is
still counting."

260 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:49:50pm

re: #256 Afrocity

NO WAY Obama eats there. Are you kidding me?

When I worked on the McCain campaign we basically ad to use someone's office and pretend we were working on Green Peace. i shit you not. Then we took the phone list to our respective homes and did the calling.

The remarkable "tolerance" of the Progressives.

261 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:50:36pm

re: #258 SanFranciscoZionist

Apropos of nothing much, I found a Chick tract about the evils of Catholicism today, stuck into a freebie newspaper rack. I had no idea that Mary was secretly 'the Masonic Isis'. Or that IHS stood for "Isis, Horus, Set".

/

Those things are STILL being published?!?

262 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:51:16pm

re: #256 Afrocity

NO WAY Obama eats there. Are you kidding me?

When I worked on the McCain campaign we basically ad to use someone's office and pretend we were working on Green Peace. i shit you not. Then we took the phone list to our respective homes and did the calling.

Well, that's the one thing you do have to give to Obama: He does have good taste in food.

263 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:51:22pm
264 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:51:48pm

re: #258 SanFranciscoZionist

Apropos of nothing much, I found a Chick tract about the evils of Catholicism today, stuck into a freebie newspaper rack. I had no idea that Mary was secretly 'the Masonic Isis'. Or that IHS stood for "Isis, Horus, Set".

/

What is a "Chick" tract?

265 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:51:55pm

re: #239 SanFranciscoZionist

textbook ( [Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...] )

My bad, not CA but OR...[Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...]

266 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:52:34pm

re: #246 FurryOldGuyJeans

I prefer doing a pre-frontal lobotomy on my self by shoving frozen peas up my nose to going to Seattle.

I'd rather have a bottle-in-front of me than go to Seattle.

267 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:52:42pm

re: #263 buzzsawmonkey

Obama eats at Manny's? Well, that's finally one thing I can respect about him. But I bet he's the kind of guy who puts mayonnaise on corned beef, and who never heard of a chocolate phosphate.

Hey, I would love to run up against him in Manny's, or any other place; provided that I wasn't hammered to the floor by his bodyguards, I think I could have a lot of fun making him very uncomfortable.

You make me uncomfortable :)

268 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:53:01pm

re: #250 Salamantis

true

269 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:53:17pm

re: #264 Walter L. Newton

What is a "Chick" tract?

Exceedingly vile hyper-sectarian religious trash.

270 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:53:28pm

re: #79 victor_yugo

Unless your name is Carl Sagan, or Stephen Jay Gould, or Charles Darwin, or Richard Dawkins, or or or...

Do you know of any congregations that invoke their names on their knees in rapt reverence?

Their contributions to human understanding are respected, but no one considers them to be demigods.

271 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:54:16pm
272 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:55:10pm

re: #264 Walter L. Newton

those little comic books about varius subjects and how you can get saved...

273 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:55:22pm
274 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:55:38pm

re: #245 Salamantis

I believe that state and federal legislatures have the power to suppress religious practices, as long as the argument can be made that they are not doing so maliciously in an attempt to subvert the 1st Amendment. Laws specifically that outlaw polygamy for example; which obviously favor monogamist religions, are not violations of the 1st Amendment on some very dubious grounds and are really in no danger of being overturned (and were recently reinforced in federal courts).

Scientology is particularly vulnerable to predatory legislation because it makes many non-faith based claims as to the efficacy of their 'dianetics' treatments. That is easy surface area that can be attacked through legislation aimed at reigning in pseudoscience quackery in the field of medicine, an attempt to promote the general welfare.

I'm not an advocate of such (as I think it could just as easily work against any religious practice), but I feel that the belief that the Constitution is really any bar at all over the power of the government, and the legislature in particular is vastly overstated.

275 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:55:39pm

re: #261 FurryOldGuyJeans

Those things are STILL being published?!?

Evidently. For $12.95 you can have more of them sent to your home. I'd be tempted, but that would involve:

1. Giving them $12.95, and

2. Giving them my address.

276 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:56:00pm

re: #257 FurryOldGuyJeans

I am glad you found a better place to "hang out". :)

I don't talk about my political views in public anymore. Most here assume I am for Obama because of my race. I have had some awkward moments, having lunch with Obots where I had to mentally stick a fork in my leg to keep from jumping across the table.

277 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:56:09pm

re: #271 buzzsawmonkey

Haven't you ever seen those cartoon-illustrated "Are You Saved?" tracts that people pass out in the subways? They are published by Chick Publications. They tend to hover somewhere between Huckabee and the Westboro Baptist Church for nuttiness.

And Chick is on the ID bandwagon.

278 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:56:34pm

re: #251 Afrocity

Umm, maybe you should take a look at Chicagoans against Obama: [Link: chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com...]

It gets real UGLY here.
That site has some of the ugliness.
I am on the down low after death threats and my dog was poisoned.

Holy shit! Someone poisoned your dog?!

279 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:56:38pm

re: #264 Walter L. Newton

What is a "Chick" tract?

Cartoon-embellished guides to salvation and paranoia.

280 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:57:02pm

re: #261 FurryOldGuyJeans

Those things are STILL being published?!?

Yep, I still run across those every one in a while too. I think that the literalism of some Protestant churches is a expression of their dislike for the Catholic Church. They distrust the Church's interpretation of the Bible (the Catholic Church has mostly been willing to approach the Bible from a non-literalist perspective), and in their reaction insist that the many to avoid interpretational abuses is to take the Bible at face value. It has always struck me as a foolish overreaction.

281 jaunte  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:57:19pm

re: #270 Salamantis

Do you know of any congregations that invoke their names on their knees in rapt reverence?

Their contributions to human understanding are respected, but no one considers them to be demigods.

ID-related threads tend to attract the genetic fallacies.

282 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:57:27pm

re: #265 Marvo76

textbook ( [Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...] )

My bad, not CA but OR...[Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...]


Thanks, I'll take a look!

283 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:57:54pm
284 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:58:01pm

re: #276 Afrocity

LOL I was on the phone talking to a buddy in line the other night when the stimulus bill was still up in the air, I started telling him about some of the goofy stuff in the bill and could see some obamaton behind the counter trying to stare me down with the evil eyes cause I was daring to speak of the osiah that way...

285 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:58:04pm

re: #88 victor_yugo

Why? Do you take exception to any of those names? IIRC, they're all "scientists" who have claimed their observations precluded a belief in God.

Actually, Charles Darwin trained for the clerisy as a young man. His faith wavered late in life not due to his theories, but for a much more personal reason; his beloved and doted-upon daughter died young of a stomach malady, and he viewed her premature demise as cosmically unjustifiable. This happened some time AFTER Darwin published Origin of Species.

286 Charles Johnson  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:58:12pm

Speaking of 'intelligent design' and the Dishonesty Institute, we have one of their shills spouting reams of nonsense in the 'Stealth Creationist Bill in Florida' thread.

The nuts are really on the rampage tonight.

287 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:58:46pm

re: #276 Afrocity

I don't talk about my political views in public anymore. Most here assume I am for Obama because of my race. I have had some awkward moments, having lunch with Obots where I had to mentally stick a fork in my leg to keep from jumping across the table.

I hope you mean Chicago when you say here. ;)

I never assume anything about people. I always wait for them to be complete jackasses all on their own if that is their disposition.

288 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 9:59:22pm

re: #263 buzzsawmonkey

Obama eats at Manny's? Well, that's finally one thing I can respect about him. But I bet he's the kind of guy who puts mayonnaise on corned beef, and who never heard of a chocolate phosphate.

Hey, I would love to run up against him in Manny's, or any other place; provided that I wasn't hammered to the floor by his bodyguards, I think I could have a lot of fun making him very uncomfortable.

Manny's has received so many new customers because Obama eats there. I am happy for the diner to get the business.

I love corned beef sandwiches.. Nice Kosher dill pickle on the side and cole slaw

289 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:00:03pm

Jack Chick got me into Dungeons and Dragons...

[Link: www.chick.com...]

Needless to say, I was sorely disappointed when I was not invested with Satanic powers by my beautiful, charismatic 'Dungeonmaster', and discovered it was in fact, just a game.

290 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:00:43pm

re: #286 Charles

Speaking of 'intelligent design' and the Dishonesty Institute, we have one of their shills spouting reams of nonsense in the 'Stealth Creationist Bill in Florida' thread.

The nuts are really on the rampage tonight.

Charles, I know I asked this earlier, but I have to ask it again. Did you put out the "Welcome Morons" mat again, or what?!?

291 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:00:54pm

re: #269 FurryOldGuyJeans

Exceedingly vile hyper-sectarian religious trash.

Got it. I've seen them since I was a kid, never knew the name of the publisher.

292 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:01:48pm

re: #286 Charles

I love how that one spouts off and runs.

293 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:02:09pm

re: #289 Scion9

Jack Chick got me into Dungeons and Dragons...

[Link: www.chick.com...]

Needless to say, I was sorely disappointed when I was not invested with Satanic powers by my beautiful, charismatic 'Dungeonmaster', and discovered it was in fact, just a game.

My first D&D game came with a coupon to join a coven.
/

294 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:02:36pm

re: #284 Marvo76

LOL I was on the phone talking to a buddy in line the other night when the stimulus bill was still up in the air, I started telling him about some of the goofy stuff in the bill and could see some obamaton behind the counter trying to stare me down with the evil eyes cause I was daring to speak of the osiah that way...

well imagine that convo in Chicago. i did it once on the bus with my friend in Texas. I forgot I was in Chicago and on a bus that is predominately AA riders. I live downtown so i got off and if looks could kill I would be a dead woman.

295 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:02:54pm

re: #290 FurryOldGuyJeans

Charles, I know I asked this earlier, but I have to ask it again. Did you put out the "Welcome Morons" mat again, or what?!?

I think its the harvest moon out tonight. You should have seen it in Chicago tonight, truly a sight to see.

296 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:03:02pm

re: #290 FurryOldGuyJeans

Charles, I know I asked this earlier, but I have to ask it again. Did you put out the "Welcome Morons" mat again, or what?!?

I didn't see it, and I've been here all evening.

297 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:03:43pm

re: #280 Dark_Falcon

Yep, I still run across those every one in a while too. I think that the literalism of some Protestant churches is a expression of their dislike for the Catholic Church. They distrust the Church's interpretation of the Bible (the Catholic Church has mostly been willing to approach the Bible from a non-literalist perspective), and in their reaction insist that the many to avoid interpretational abuses is to take the Bible at face value. It has always struck me as a foolish overreaction.

I think that also, the only way to avoid dealing with the fact that Roman Catholicism WAS the Western Church for centuries is to insist that their own practice is derived solely from straightforward Biblical interpretation.

298 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:03:59pm

Linda Blair as Regan (The Exorcist) at Obama inauguration.

299 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:04:11pm

re: #264 Walter L. Newton

What is a "Chick" tract?

Fire Insurance Gospel!

REPENT OR BURN IN HELL YOU HEATHEN!

Sad but true.

300 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:04:20pm

re: #296 Walter L. Newton

I didn't see it, and I've been here all evening.

In the Huckster thread.

And you haven't been here ALL evening since you did scamper out for some batteries earlier. ;)

301 jaunte  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:05:38pm

re: #299 JCM

A Jack Chick sample:
[Link: www.flickr.com...]

302 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:05:42pm

re: #251 Afrocity

Umm, maybe you should take a look at Chicagoans against Obama: [Link: chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com...]

It gets real UGLY here.
That site has some of the ugliness.
I am on the down low after death threats and my dog was poisoned.

Move out to Kane County!

303 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:05:43pm

re: #157 Killgore Trout

Yes, it's probably safe for work.

It is, and for not stating that up front, I hate you. Damn tease.
///

304 jaunte  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:06:39pm

Goodnight all.

305 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:06:42pm

re: #278 Sharmuta

Holy shit! Someone poisoned your dog?!

Sharmuta,

He made it through. Someone through some hamburger meat onto my balcony. I had a McCain sign up and my dogs hang out on the patio all the time. My dog was whimpering and I found some waxed paper -like from a butcher on the ground. Then he went into convulsions so I got him to a vet. They said it was LYE.

306 pat  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:06:45pm

OT
I think it is fair now to ask whether the Obama administration is insane. This Tax Cheat in the treasury has proposed a bill that amounts to a ticket to hell.

307 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:08:01pm

re: #305 Afrocity

That's horrible! I'm so sorry, but glad you're dog's okay.

308 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:08:55pm

re: #297 SanFranciscoZionist

Some other denominations see Catholicism as a divergent and contentious sect due to the Holy Mother ( they don't believe in her intercession but going to Jesus directly) and the catechisms and other stuff followed in lieu of the new testament.

309 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:08:56pm

re: #305 Afrocity

Sharmuta,

He made it through. Someone through some hamburger meat onto my balcony. I had a McCain sign up and my dogs hang out on the patio all the time. My dog was whimpering and I found some waxed paper -like from a butcher on the ground. Then he went into convulsions so I got him to a vet. They said it was LYE.

I am glad your dog made it. What happened is so vile.

310 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:09:30pm

New YorkChicago's such a wonderful city. Although I was at the library today. The guy was very rude. I said, "I'd like a card." He says, "You have to prove you're a citizen of New YorkChicago." So I stabbed him.

-Emo Phillips

311 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:10:02pm
312 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:10:03pm

re: #305 Afrocity

Bastards...

313 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:10:57pm

Dark Falcon are you in Chicago proper?

Wow you must be the other half of the 1 percent that voted for McCain in Crook County.

314 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:11:34pm

re: #313 Afrocity

Dark Falcon are you in Chicago proper?

Wow you must be the other half of the 1 percent that voted for McCain in Crook County.

You so need to move. ;)

315 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:11:59pm

re: #301 jaunte

A Jack Chick sample:
[Link: www.flickr.com...]

Grew up with the things, they always creeped me out and my dad and grand dad are preachers.

316 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:12:40pm

re: #313 Afrocity

Seattle is nice.

It rains a bit, but otherwise, its very pleasant.

317 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:12:44pm
318 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:13:02pm

re: #305 Afrocity

Sharmuta,

He made it through. Someone through some hamburger meat onto my balcony. I had a McCain sign up and my dogs hang out on the patio all the time. My dog was whimpering and I found some waxed paper -like from a butcher on the ground. Then he went into convulsions so I got him to a vet. They said it was LYE.

Thank God he made it. What a horrible thing.

319 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:13:03pm

re: #200 ASU86PE

re: #59 Sharmuta


But not all of us. It is true that the biblical view has had a tough time regaining acceptance in the state schools. But that's nothing new.

Anyways, Keep the Faith and be open-minded about some of the opinions at this site. Some are vile; some are sharp; some are dull. Remember, Romans 10:17 "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. "

Yep. Some people are impervious to empirical evidence; they have hardened their hearts against it, and turned their minds away from it. If they perceive reality as contradicting their cherished religious dogmas, it is reality that they deny.

320 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:14:27pm

re: #308 Marvo76

Some other denominations see Catholicism as a divergent and contentious sect due to the Holy Mother ( they don't believe in her intercession but going to Jesus directly) and the catechisms and other stuff followed in lieu of the new testament.

Well, that's why they're Protestants, I suppose...

/

321 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:15:00pm

re: #314 FurryOldGuyJeans

You so need to move. ;)

Like I said, why give Daley any part of your income in the form of taxes?

322 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:15:14pm

re: #305 Afrocity

Sharmuta,

He made it through. Someone through some hamburger meat onto my balcony. I had a McCain sign up and my dogs hang out on the patio all the time. My dog was whimpering and I found some waxed paper -like from a butcher on the ground. Then he went into convulsions so I got him to a vet. They said it was LYE.

What did your dog have to go through, I mean, what happened at the doctors? It must have been a real horror for him.

323 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:15:29pm

It is funny but this election has caused me to question everything I thought I knew about myself and my friends. It was unsettling. You think you know your party and then you are the outsider.

324 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:16:20pm

re: #315 JCM

Grew up with the things, they always creeped me out and my dad and grand dad are preachers.

Some religious people came to my door once and gave me some of those books. I thought they were uber-weird and threw them away.

Since that time, I just don't answer the door.

325 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:16:25pm

re: #316 Syrah

Seattle is nice.

It rains a bit, but otherwise, its very pleasant.

Rain is better than lots of snow and cold, I always say.

Wish there was more of the former and less of the latter here in the South Sound at the moment.

I. Hate. Snow. :%P%

326 Marvo76  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:16:29pm

well foks we are about to get a nice little rain storm here in central IN, so I bid you a good night and will see some of you

Pick one...
tomorrow
eventually
sometime

327 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:17:13pm

re: #323 Afrocity

It is funny but this election has caused me to question everything I thought I knew about myself and my friends. It was unsettling. You think you know your party and then you are the outsider.

I went thru that as a result of 9/11.

328 [deleted]  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:17:18pm
329 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:17:20pm

re: #323 Afrocity

It is funny but this election has caused me to question everything I thought I knew about myself and my friends. It was unsettling. You think you know your party and then you are the outsider.

Never felt like an insider, ever. Always looking through the window.

330 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:18:34pm

re: #325 FurryOldGuyJeans

I'd rather have rain than s**w and cold any day.

331 lostlakehiker  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:20:34pm

re: #200 ASU86PE

re: #59 Sharmuta

But not all of us. It is true that the biblical view has had a tough time regaining acceptance in the state schools. But that's nothing new.

Anyways, Keep the Faith and be open-minded about some of the opinions at this site. Some are vile; some are sharp; some are dull. Remember, Romans 10:17 "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. "

Faith is consistent with belief in evolution.

332 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:20:49pm

re: #330 sngnsgt

I'd rather have rain than s**w and cold any day.

Try a Republic of the Philippines Monsoon some time then. You will quickly learn to appreciate the wonders and pleasures of dry. ;)

333 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:20:56pm

re: #322 Walter L. Newton

It basically was eating away at his stomach lining but we think there was not enough poison in the meat balls or whatever it was to kill him. They cleaned him out and we did vitamin K regimens for a month. It did cause damage to his bladder and now he has incontinence. He is a dalmatian and 12 years old. Had it been my younger dalmatian, the 2 year old female,the vet said she would have been toast due to her weight. I live downtown so the Vet is close.
The scary part is it had to be someone in my building.

334 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:21:27pm

re: #331 lostlakehiker

Faith is consistent with belief in evolution.

Someone was spouting dogma, not faith.

335 dapperdave  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:21:28pm

re: #324 ggt

ooouuuchhh! but what if you missed Ed McMahon, you know one million bucks?

336 Walter L. Newton  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:22:44pm

re: #333 Afrocity

It basically was eating away at his stomach lining but we think there was not enough poison in the meat balls or whatever it was to kill him. They cleaned him out and we did vitamin K regimens for a month. It did cause damage to his bladder and now he has incontinence. He is a dalmatian and 12 years old. Had it been my younger dalmatian, the 2 year old female,the vet said she would have been toast due to her weight. I live downtown so the Vet is close.
The scary part is it had to be someone in my building.

Asshole(s) (whoever was responsible).

337 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:23:15pm

re: #274 Scion9

I believe that state and federal legislatures have the power to suppress religious practices, as long as the argument can be made that they are not doing so maliciously in an attempt to subvert the 1st Amendment. Laws specifically that outlaw polygamy for example; which obviously favor monogamist religions, are not violations of the 1st Amendment on some very dubious grounds and are really in no danger of being overturned (and were recently reinforced in federal courts).

Scientology is particularly vulnerable to predatory legislation because it makes many non-faith based claims as to the efficacy of their 'dianetics' treatments. That is easy surface area that can be attacked through legislation aimed at reigning in pseudoscience quackery in the field of medicine, an attempt to promote the general welfare.

I'm not an advocate of such (as I think it could just as easily work against any religious practice), but I feel that the belief that the Constitution is really any bar at all over the power of the government, and the legislature in particular is vastly overstated.

Well, most legislators try to be accommodating to nonordinary religious practices when they can be; for instance, the Congressional permission for members of the Native American Church to consume peyote during their religious ceremonies.

338 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:23:30pm

re: #332 FurryOldGuyJeans

Try a Republic of the Philippines Monsoon some time then. You will quickly learn to appreciate the wonders and pleasures of dry. ;)

May 5th I'll have dry and warm. Moving to Vegas on May 1st from NW PA.

339 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:23:57pm

re: #333 Afrocity

It basically was eating away at his stomach lining but we think there was not enough poison in the meat balls or whatever it was to kill him. They cleaned him out and we did vitamin K regimens for a month. It did cause damage to his bladder and now he has incontinence. He is a dalmatian and 12 years old. Had it been my younger dalmatian, the 2 year old female,the vet said she would have been toast due to her weight. I live downtown so the Vet is close.
The scary part is it had to be someone in my building.

That is one lucky dog to have such an owner like you.

340 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:24:39pm

re: #338 sngnsgt

May 5th I'll have dry and warm. Moving to Vegas on May 1st from NW PA.

No, that dry and HOT! ;)

341 Neo Con since 9-11  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:24:42pm

re: #323 Afrocity

It is funny but this election has caused me to question everything I thought I knew about myself and my friends. It was unsettling. You think you know your party and then you are the outsider.


Welcome to the dark side. I expect your AA friends to treat you with the same lack of respect my Jewish friends treated me. I wish the best for you but expect your friends to behave poorly.

342 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:26:55pm

re: #341 Neo Con since 9-11

Welcome to the dark side. I expect your AA friends to treat you with the same lack of respect my Jewish friends treated me. I wish the best for you but expect your friends to behave poorly.

Acting poorly would be a step up after the death threats and near fatal dog poisoning.

343 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:27:14pm

re: #280 Dark_Falcon

Yep, I still run across those every one in a while too. I think that the literalism of some Protestant churches is a expression of their dislike for the Catholic Church. They distrust the Church's interpretation of the Bible (the Catholic Church has mostly been willing to approach the Bible from a non-literalist perspective), and in their reaction insist that the many to avoid interpretational abuses is to take the Bible at face value. It has always struck me as a foolish overreaction.

Another thing that Protestants take issue with is the clerical mediation of deific petitions. Protestants believe that such mediation is not necessary and that people can connect with and petition God in prayer themselves. They were truly troubled by the selling of priestly indulgences, and clerics offering to pray relatives out of hell for a fee.

344 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:29:11pm

re: #340 FurryOldGuyJeans

I love the dry heat! After a long, cold PA winter, the desert sun is going to feel great! Until a few years ago, (moved here for family reasons) I lived there for 11 years and loved every minute of it.

345 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:30:38pm

re: #344 sngnsgt

I love the dry heat! After a long, cold PA winter, the desert sun is going to feel great! Until a few years ago, (moved here for family reasons) I lived there for 11 years and loved every minute of it.

I'm just not a person that enjoys hot weather all that much. Too hot-blooded, I guess. ;)

346 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:30:43pm

re: #336 Walter L. Newton

Asshole(s) (whoever was responsible).

This sounds hokey but my belief system is that I am in full control of my life. God is my co-pilot. The person that I think or know did it has dogs too, but is such a hypocrite on so many levels. It was my fault for arguing with him when he asked me to remove the McCain sign. I should have respected his wishes and not went to the condo association (who ruled in my favor). That was my lesson to learn.

347 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:33:01pm

re: #335 dapperdave

ooouuuchhh! but what if you missed Ed McMahon, you know one million bucks?

eh, I'll take my chances.

348 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:33:12pm

re: #313 Afrocity

Dark Falcon are you in Chicago proper?

Wow you must be the other half of the 1 percent that voted for McCain in Crook County.

No, I live in a Near-Northwest Suburb. I did indeed vote for McCain and I also put a sign out, though I didn't catch much flak for it. Sorry about what some jerk did to your dog. I applaud your restraint: my own probable reaction to such a thing would get me banned if I discussed it here.

349 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:34:03pm

re: #346 Afrocity

This sounds hokey but my belief system is that I am in full control of my life. God is my co-pilot. The person that I think or know did it has dogs too, but is such a hypocrite on so many levels. It was my fault for arguing with him when he asked me to remove the McCain sign. I should have respected his wishes and not went to the condo association (who ruled in my favor). That was my lesson to learn.

That is so fucked up in so many ways. You did NOTHING wrong.

The only lesson you learned is that you are not a member of the Hive Mind. And I am glad you learned it.

350 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:34:28pm

re: #258 SanFranciscoZionist

Chick is a nasty piece of work, a real fear mongering troofer.

For the gamers: Chick Tracts

351 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:34:34pm

re: #345 FurryOldGuyJeans

I'm just not a person that enjoys hot weather all that much. Too hot-blooded, I guess. ;)

I'm freezing here. If not for family, I'd never have came back. That reason has since passed. I hope to be there forever.

352 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:36:00pm

re: #341 Neo Con since 9-11

Welcome to the dark side. I expect your AA friends to treat you with the same lack of respect my Jewish friends treated me. I wish the best for you but expect your friends to behave poorly.

You mean like my aunt who is still doing "deprogramming" me by sending me copies of Ebony Magazine. They think my leaving the DEMS is a phase. I mentally left years ago. I thought I was the problem. It was the DNC.

What AA friends?

I have acquaintances, long distance friends and dogs.
I lost 4 friends over this election. One ended in a nasty argument over Sarah Palin in an Outback Restaurant. That was a waste of a Bloomin' Onion

353 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:37:04pm

re: #351 sngnsgt

I'm freezing here. If not for family, I'd never have came back. That reason has since passed. I hope to be there forever.

I didn't say I liked or tolerate cold weather like what you get up there. I learned my lessons about cold spending two winters in Adak, AK. Give me the occasional snow and near constant rain here south of Seattle, thank you very much. ;)

354 Syrah  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:37:49pm

I am off to the land of dreams my freinds.

The bed is singing her siren song and I can no longer resist.

Odysseus stuffed the ears of his crew with wax and had himself tied to the ship's mast so that he could listen to the song through to its end with out dashing himself to his death on the rocky shores from which they sang.

What a lot of bother.

I will just go to bed.

Goodnight.

355 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:38:18pm

re: #354 Syrah

I am off to the land of dreams my freinds.

The bed is singing her siren song and I can no longer resist.

Odysseus stuffed the ears of his crew with wax and had himself tied to the ship's mast so that he could listen to the song through to its end with out dashing himself to his death on the rocky shores from which they sang.

What a lot of bother.

I will just go to bed.

Goodnight.

May the rack monster punish you good. ;)

356 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:39:11pm

re: #272 Marvo76

those little comic books about varius subjects and how you can get saved...

...if you agree to buy into a hate filled, fear mongering, trooferistic point of view.

357 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:39:59pm

re: #353 FurryOldGuyJeans

I didn't say I liked or tolerate cold weather like what you get up there. I learned my lessons about cold spending two winters in Adak, AK. Give me the occasional snow and near constant rain here south of Seattle, thank you very much. ;)

LOL! In Vegas, it's up there on the mountains right where it belongs if I want to go visit.

358 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:40:04pm

Good evening, lizards. Hope all is well.

I'm so freaked out to read about your dog, Afrocity. I would have been a basket case. Here I was with my McCain signs inside the house, chicken that I am because I have to park my convertible on the street and was afraid of my top getting cut. When I was a kid I sure don't remember this hatefulness between the parties.

359 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:40:09pm

re: #354 Syrah

Good night sweet wine!

360 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:40:43pm

re: #346 Afrocity

This sounds hokey but my belief system is that I am in full control of my life. God is my co-pilot. The person that I think or know did it has dogs too, but is such a hypocrite on so many levels. It was my fault for arguing with him when he asked me to remove the McCain sign. I should have respected his wishes and not went to the condo association (who ruled in my favor). That was my lesson to learn.

I've been through something like that. When things were really bad here in the '80's, my wiffe and myself volunteered as NOW abortion clinic escorts, shielding the women with our bodies and absorbing the blows aimed at them from antiabortion protestors' picket placards on our own shoulders.

They illegally accessed my university transcripts so they could work up a psychological profile to employ against me. They phoned my home with dozens of screaming rants and sinister death threats daily, at all hours of the day and night, for weeks on end. They sabotaged our car, and surveilled our home. And they strangled our family cat and hung it from a backyard tree by a noose around its neck, with a note safety-pinned to its belly reading YOU'RE NEXT, BABYKILLER!

361 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:40:45pm

re: #35 Sharmuta

NOVA- one of the few good things left about PBS.

I like the Nature shows, and the travel ones. Front Line is sometimes good.
Bill Moyers is a joke.

362 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:41:20pm

re: #343 Salamantis

Another thing that Protestants take issue with is the clerical mediation of deific petitions. Protestants believe that such mediation is not necessary and that people can connect with and petition God in prayer themselves. They were truly troubled by the selling of priestly indulgences, and clerics offering to pray relatives out of hell for a fee.

The selling of indulgences was an abuse, it is true. The Catholic clergy has at times indeed abused its authority (though in my mind such times have been the exception, not the rule). Still, the literalist reaction throws the baby out with the bathwater. It insists that the only way to prevent abuses is to inflexibly take the Bible at face value and attack anything that calls anything in it into question. To my mind, this amounts to a refusal to think, and I regard a refusal to think as a refusal of one of God's greatest gifts.

363 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:42:42pm

re: #360 Salamantis

Dang, bro' I would have gone totally medieval on them, that is for sure.

364 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:43:11pm

re: #343 Salamantis

For Protestant theology to work at all they have to reject the primacy of the Catholic Church. Catholic theology teaches that their priestly tradition is directly descended from Peter, and that keys to the kingdom of Heaven were bestowed upon them Christ by way of Peter.

That following Catholic ritual, as directed by a Catholic priest is intrinsic to Christian dogma, and necessary to be admitted into heaven.

The Mormons also follow this theology, but believe that the Catholic Church had fallen into apostasy and Christ bestowed the keys to their prophet.

Protestantism doesn't work with this theology for obvious reasons, and most reject the concept of a Priestly tradition that has primacy. A lot of Protestant sects don't reject the concept of a priest/pastor as an intercessor for the faithful altogether, but that the gaining of the keys to the kingdom is done in a literal fashion, from priest to priest, generation to generation. That a direct line from Peter is not necessary to do the work of God.

This doesn't necessarily translate into a lack of a need for the Church because faithful can fulfill rituals on their own. Most still adhere to a theology that says one must attend rituals as performed by clergy.

365 pat  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:43:28pm

I save those little comic books. Love them. Consider them highly interesting although the plot is repetitive.

366 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:44:47pm

re: #362 Dark_Falcon

The selling of indulgences was an abuse, it is true. The Catholic clergy has at times indeed abused its authority (though in my mind such times have been the exception, not the rule). Still, the literalist reaction throws the baby out with the bathwater. It insists that the only way to prevent abuses is to inflexibly take the Bible at face value and attack anything that calls anything in it into question. To my mind, this amounts to a refusal to think, and I regard a refusal to think as a refusal of one of God's greatest gifts.

I think the Protestant doctrine in question is known as the "priesthood of the believer."

You know that I have no respect for Genesis Literalism. But not all Protestant sects embrace it (Southern Baptists and Assembly of God-ers do).

367 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:44:54pm

re: #358 Pvt Bin Jammin

Xanax is a beautiful thing. I lived in NYC during 9-11. Developed panic disorder. My mom died suddenly in 2007. That is the best thing about being to hell and back. If you find yourself back there you have a bread crumb trail to follow to get out again.

368 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:47:28pm

Afrocity, what did my #362 do to deserve that downding? I hope I did not offend you. That certainly was not my intention.

369 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:47:34pm

re: #363 rawmuse

Dang, bro' I would have gone totally medieval on them, that is for sure.

I did better than that; I got one of them sent to prison for 5 years.

370 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:47:47pm

re: #305 Afrocity

My heart goes out to you and your dog. That's about ten kinds of fucked up. Sick, sick bastards.

371 Scion9  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:47:50pm

Since we are on the subject of Protestant theology...


Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump.

I said, "Don't do it!"
He said, "Nobody loves me."
I said, "God loves you. Do you believe in God?"

He said, "Yes."
I said, "Are you a Christian or a Jew?"
He said, "A Christian."
I said, "Me, too! Protestant or Catholic?"
He said, "Protestant."
I said, "Me, too! What franchise?"
He said, "Baptist."
I said, "Me, too! Northern Baptist or Southern Baptist?"
He said, "Northern Baptist."
I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist or Northern Liberal Baptist?"

He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist."
I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region, or Northern Conservative Baptist Eastern Region?"
He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region."

I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879, or Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912?"
He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912."

I said, "Die, heretic!" And I pushed him over.

-Emo Phillips

372 ArchangelMichael  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:49:49pm

re: #271 buzzsawmonkey

Haven't you ever seen those cartoon-illustrated "Are You Saved?" tracts that people pass out in the subways? They are published by Chick Publications. They tend to hover somewhere between Huckabee and the Westboro Baptist Church for nuttiness.

Besides ID, aren't they also on the Geocentrism bandwagon too? I thought I saw some of that nonsense from them before.

373 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:49:55pm

re: #369 Salamantis

I did better than that; I got one of them sent to prison for 5 years.

Sweet.

374 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:50:10pm

re: #360 Salamantis

That is awful...I do have a silly question. I assume you are pro-choice then. I am sure your position gets you a lot of grief among GOP. I am pro choice and that was the one thread that I clung too with the left. I let it goes because it was not enough to make me stay.

375 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:50:30pm

re: #367 Afrocity

I tried a few of those when my mom was terminally ill back in 1983 & 84 They are pretty good. I'm just not much of a pill person. Like my martinis, now.

So glad your dog made it. My little dogs are my family, as it sounds like yours are.I sure don't understand folks who are this vicious over politics.

376 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:51:40pm

re: #368 Dark_Falcon

what is a downding? I may have hit something by mistake.

377 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:52:50pm

re: #376 Afrocity

what is a downding? I may have hit something by mistake.

Click the red - or the green + to rate a comment.
You can go back up and undo a mistaken ding.

378 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:53:49pm

re: #369 Salamantis

I did better than that; I got one of them sent to prison for 5 years.

I sent some drug dealers to prison about a decade ago. They are maybe getting out soon. California will probably let them go, since we are broke.

379 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:54:09pm

re: #376 Afrocity

what is a downding? I may have hit something by mistake.

When you hit the minus sign on a person's post. It means that you didn't like what they were saying or how they said it. It can be reversed by hitting the plus sign once to bring it back to neutral or twice to positively mark the post (called an upding).

380 MrPaulRevere  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:54:53pm

Fascinating show, thanks Charles.

381 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:55:04pm

re: #315 JCM

Grew up with the things, they always creeped me out and my dad and grand dad are preachers.

I was given a bunch of the comics (still have this one) by some close relatives of mine when I was a teenager. It's a sad, sad day for a young boy when he realizes that he has more on the ball, mentally, then his trusted elders.

382 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:55:09pm

Liberals claim to be open minded. Yet they are so judgmental.

You don't recycle
The stimulus should have contraceptives in the package
proposition 8 is the black peoples fault
I hate Christmas

Blah, blah

so sick of them. I got to the point where I was like STFU

383 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:55:43pm

re: #378 rawmuse

I sent some drug dealers to prison about a decade ago. They are maybe getting out soon. California will probably let them go, since we are broke.

They are definitely going to release some prisoners soon. That's all we need. You be careful.

384 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:55:50pm

re: #374 Afrocity

That is awful...I do have a silly question. I assume you are pro-choice then. I am sure your position gets you a lot of grief among GOP. I am pro choice and that was the one thread that I clung too with the left. I let it goes because it was not enough to make me stay.

I remain a social libertarian and have also always been a fiscal conservative. But I am also a foreign policy GWOT supporter and antijihadist constitutional-democracy spreader (I'm neoconish that way). I actually think of myself as a classical liberal (like Scoop Jackson was). It really gripes me that leftists stole the L word and slimed it by their words and actions; true classical liberals abhor totalitarianisms, whether they are theocratic or secular, while leftists have yet to meet one with which they have not become enthralled.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

385 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:56:17pm

re: #383 Pvt Bin Jammin

Armed to the teeth here. Wifey too.

386 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:56:45pm

I fixed it Dark Falcon.

387 ArchangelMichael  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:57:26pm

re: #323 Afrocity

It is funny but this election has caused me to question everything I thought I knew about myself and my friends. It was unsettling. You think you know your party and then you are the outsider.

Something similar happened to me. It was 9-11. My gf and I basically lost (or chose to distance ourselves from) nearly every friend and acquaintance that we had. I never had death threats or anything quite so extreme though. I was just really hurt that close friends were now people to be avoided.

388 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:57:31pm

re: #385 rawmuse

Armed to the teeth here. Wifey too.

Good for you. That reminds me I need to buy ammo while I still afford some.

389 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:58:29pm

re: #352 Afrocity

You mean like my aunt who is still doing "deprogramming" me by sending me copies of Ebony Magazine. They think my leaving the DEMS is a phase. I mentally left years ago. I thought I was the problem. It was the DNC.

What AA friends?

I have acquaintances, long distance friends and dogs.
I lost 4 friends over this election. One ended in a nasty argument over Sarah Palin in an Outback Restaurant. That was a waste of a Bloomin' Onion

You're having a rough time of it. I can't imagine. I shrugged off a few college friends I couldn't deal with anymore after 9/11, but this...

Sorry about the Onion. Does Ebony at least have good, uh, makeup tips? Recipes? Horoscope column?

390 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:58:56pm

re: #386 Afrocity

I fixed it Dark Falcon.

Thank you. Feel free let me know if you think I'm wrong, just let me know why. It's the best way for me to learn, I've found.

391 pat  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 10:59:24pm

re: #388 Pvt Bin Jammin

Good for you. That reminds me I need to buy ammo while I still afford some.

A reloader on Ebay is cheap, and you can buy enough shells, shot, bullets, and powder for nothing.

392 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:01:27pm

re: #391 pat

Not a bad idea, really. Hope Calif. doesn't have any restrictions in that regard. LOL You just never know. We have gun divisions on some of the police departments now.

393 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:01:44pm

re: #333 Afrocity

The more I read your tale, the angrier I get. Words fail me. What sick fucks. I hope you find out who is responsible, and you can get prosecutable evidence.

394 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:01:50pm

re: #381 Slumbering Behemoth

I was given a bunch of the comics (still have this one) by some close relatives of mine when I was a teenager. It's a sad, sad day for a young boy when he realizes that he has more on the ball, mentally, then his trusted elders.

I ask myself very early, if being a Christian is so wonderful, why do they have to scare me into being one?

It took me a long time to discover the wonderfulness without the fear.

395 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:02:10pm

re: #382 Afrocity

The Hive Mind of Progressives strikes again.

396 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:03:17pm

re: #389 SanFranciscoZionist

You're having a rough time of it. I can't imagine. I shrugged off a few college friends I couldn't deal with anymore after 9/11, but this...

Sorry about the Onion. Does Ebony at least have good, uh, makeup tips? Recipes? Horoscope column?

Ebony is a rag. It was originally intended to be the Black man's "Life" magazine. Now it is filled with Obama centerfolds.

397 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:04:22pm

re: #393 Slumbering Behemoth

The more I read your tale, the angrier I get. Words fail me. What sick fucks. I hope you find out who is responsible, and you can get prosecutable evidence.

I say we give the good fellas on the South side a call. Quicker, neater, and a sure thing...
///

398 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:04:31pm

re: #393 Slumbering Behemoth

The more I read your tale, the angrier I get. Words fail me. What sick fucks. I hope you find out who is responsible, and you can get prosecutable evidence.

Not sure that would be the best idea in Chicago. Its not a trifling thing to declare your opposition to the machine's candidates here. You might end up getting noticed by people with authority who decide to investigate you instead. It has happened.

399 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:04:38pm

Driving downtown today I noticed two signs in particular,
One was a fenced up, closed gas station, derelict, on the corner of 6th and Harrison. On one of the gas islands was a huge Obama poster. It said "progress".

Then, on the side of a Muni bus, an ad for Islam, specifically WhyIslam.org.

400 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:05:03pm

I don't know. We've got a two-time Bush voter at the school I work at, and a sweet little old lady who is an passionate old-time union Democrat, and they go at it like cats and dogs a couple times a week, yelling and looking things up on the computer while the rest of us eat popcorn and call out suggestions. They like each other fine.

That's how it should be. Leads to open minds and free exchange of ideas.

401 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:05:19pm

re: #396 Afrocity

Ebony is a rag. It was originally intended to be the Black man's "Life" magazine. Now it is filled with Obama centerfolds.

Sounds like BET. Even Nickelodeon is worshipfully a charter member of the O Cult of Personality.

402 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:05:58pm

re: #398 Dark_Falcon

Not sure that would be the best idea in Chicago. Its not a trifling thing to declare your opposition to the machine's candidates here. You might end up getting noticed by people with authority who decide to investigate you instead. It has happened.

Might be prudent to consider moving.

403 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:06:00pm

re: #396 Afrocity

Ebony is a rag. It was originally intended to be the Black man's "Life" magazine. Now it is filled with Obama centerfolds.

They better watch the "fold" part. In NorKo folding a picture of the Dear Leader will get you, your kids and parents a stay in a nice little camp in the country for a few years.

404 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:06:13pm

re: #396 Afrocity

Ebony is a rag. It was originally intended to be the Black man's "Life" magazine. Now it is filled with Obama centerfolds.

Oh well, I tried...no silver lining there.

/

405 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:07:16pm

re: #399 rawmuse

Driving downtown today I noticed two signs in particular,
One was a fenced up, closed gas station, derelict, on the corner of 6th and Harrison. On one of the gas islands was a huge Obama poster. It said "progress".

Then, on the side of a Muni bus, an ad for Islam, specifically WhyIslam.org.

May I be so bold as to inquire where downtown is exactly? Hmmm? ;)

406 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:07:25pm

re: #399 rawmuse

Driving downtown today I noticed two signs in particular,
One was a fenced up, closed gas station, derelict, on the corner of 6th and Harrison. On one of the gas islands was a huge Obama poster. It said "progress".

Then, on the side of a Muni bus, an ad for Islam, specifically WhyIslam.org.

Is that what that was? I saw a bus moving away with ISLAM in big letters, but it was getting dark and I couldn't make it all out.

407 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:07:43pm

re: #400 SanFranciscoZionist

I don't know. We've got a two-time Bush voter at the school I work at, and a sweet little old lady who is an passionate old-time union Democrat, and they go at it like cats and dogs a couple times a week, yelling and looking things up on the computer while the rest of us eat popcorn and call out suggestions. They like each other fine.

That's how it should be. Leads to open minds and free exchange of ideas.

I had a liberal college prof, we be at each other like cats and dogs during class.
Classmates could never figure out why we had coffee together almost every morning before class.

408 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:08:42pm

re: #405 FurryOldGuyJeans

May I be so bold as to inquire where downtown is exactly? Hmmm? ;)

San Francisco, natch.

409 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:09:32pm

re: #393 Slumbering Behemoth

The more I read your tale, the angrier I get. Words fail me. What sick fucks. I hope you find out who is responsible, and you can get prosecutable evidence.

It is between him and his god which is most likely Barack Obama.
The police investigated and since I live in a hi-rise on the 10th floor they questioned the neighbors on the 11th, who denied it and offered some lame reasoning that someone was barbequing and the hamburger was blown by the wind onto my patio. which is BS. So I guess so woman is lucky because her husband was about to feed her poised barbecue hamburgers. The McCain sign is in plan view, The neighbor wanted me to remove it because it looked like the building was endorsing McCain b/c my sign was visible from the parking lot where Chicago Bears tailgaters park.

410 Dark_Falcon  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:09:59pm

re: #402 FurryOldGuyJeans

Might be prudent to consider moving.

That's why I don't live in the city proper. Truth to tell, the odds of the scenario I outlined happening are low. But it is a fact that there are many people in Chicago who see Republicans as just plain evil and some of them think themselves justified in using intimidation and violence to silence them.

411 Dustyvet  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:10:37pm

Miranda rule may hamper detainee trials
None of the men held at Guantanamo were advised of their rights against self-incrimination. That and other issues may cause problems for President Obama's goal of trying them in a civil legal system.


Are they frigging sh*** me! I've served in combat, and I was never issued a Miranda Card!

412 pat  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:11:16pm

re: #392 Pvt Bin Jammin

Not only is it mostly unregulated, only the powder and caps are controlled, and a couple dozen cans will last a LONG time, but you can buy the rest off the net or from gun shows with no hindrance. I know many who became experts and enjoyed the hobby immensely.

413 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:11:59pm

re: #406 SanFranciscoZionist

I saw the two things within seconds of each other. I felt like I had slipped in to the Twilight Zone or something.

414 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:13:31pm

re: #346 Afrocity

It was my fault for arguing with him when he asked me to remove the McCain sign. I should have respected his wishes and not went to the condo association (who ruled in my favor). That was my lesson to learn.

Please don't think like that. Standing up for what you believe is right may very well cause others to do illegal and disgusting things, but it is not your fault that this happened.

The sick fuck who did this could have simply continued to engage you in debate, rather than committing this heinous act.

415 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:13:37pm

re: #411 Dustyvet

Miranda rule may hamper detainee trials
None of the men held at Guantanamo were advised of their rights against self-incrimination. That and other issues may cause problems for President Obama's goal of trying them in a civil legal system.

Are they frigging sh*** me! I've served in combat, and I was never issued a Miranda Card!

Battle field captures will go down. In combat making sure the opfor is down and out. We lose valuable intel sources because the G*ddamn administration has decided we're are fighting a war, we're looking for criminals.

*SPIT*

416 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:14:36pm

re: #374 Afrocity

That is awful...I do have a silly question. I assume you are pro-choice then. I am sure your position gets you a lot of grief among GOP. I am pro choice and that was the one thread that I clung too with the left. I let it goes because it was not enough to make me stay.

I am also pro gay civil unions, although I see no necessity to call them marriages, as long as they automatically extend the same spousal rights and benefits (tax purposes, mutual inheritance rights, mutual medical decision rights, spousal employment benefits) that are automatically granted by heterosexual marriages. I have three gay cousins (two male, one female). They have held their jobs for many years, and have lived with their lifelong partners for some time. They are generally conservative in outlook, and are repelled and appalled by San Fran style flaunting. They're my family, I love them, and I want them to be able to enjoy the same rights and freedoms that straight US citizens enjoy.

417 slokat  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:14:39pm

Since guns have been mentioned, here's a fun pic - Girls with Guns

418 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:14:51pm

re: #411 Dustyvet

Miranda rule may hamper detainee trials
None of the men held at Guantanamo were advised of their rights against self-incrimination. That and other issues may cause problems for President Obama's goal of trying them in a civil legal system.


Are they frigging sh*** me! I've served in combat, and I was never issued a Miranda Card!

I can't even figure out what angle to come at that one from. I'm just sitting here, frowning, and trying to follow one train of thought to a logical conclusion.

Wow.

419 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:15:55pm

re: #408 rawmuse

San Francisco, natch.

As I said earlier I never assume things about people, so it ain't "natch" that you were talking about SF.

At least to me. ;)

420 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:18:13pm

re: #416 Salamantis

I am pro civil union. The only problem I have with gay marriage is the two lesbian couples i have known that broke up with their partners yet simply moved out without the need for a divorce. If the divorce or lack of it is no big deal, why is it such a big deal to get married?

421 sngnsgt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:18:33pm

Global whoreming alert:

UPDATE: 50-below sets Maine record

AUGUSTA -- The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Geological Survey and Maine State Climate Office announced today that a minus-50 reading in northwestern Maine held up to scientific scrutiny.

That beats Maine's old record of 48 below zero set in 1925 in Van Buren, and ties the record for coldest temperature recorded in New England. That reading was made in 1933 in Bloomfield, Vt.

news.mainetoday.com

422 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:19:12pm

re: #420 Afrocity

I am pro civil union. The only problem I have with gay marriage is the two lesbian couples i have known that broke up with their partners yet simply moved out without the need for a divorce. If the divorce or lack of it is no big deal, why is it such a big deal to get married?

Were they married?

423 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:19:33pm

re: #419 FurryOldGuyJeans

Hey, you changed your profile pic. I make a note of where Lizards reside. You are in Washington state, no? JCM too.

424 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:20:18pm

Seems that WhyIslam.org is also doing an ad campaign on the NYC subways. Looking at their website now.

425 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:20:43pm

re: #423 rawmuse

Hey, you changed your profile pic. I make a note of where Lizards reside. You are in Washington state, no? JCM too.

Just North of Seattle, Furry is farther south.

426 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:21:31pm

re: #423 rawmuse

Hey, you changed your profile pic. I make a note of where Lizards reside. You are in Washington state, no? JCM too.

South of Seattle, yes. Nearby we have a bunch of soldiers and airmen that love to play with their toys a lot; Ft. Lewis and McChord.

427 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:22:11pm

re: #414 Slumbering Behemoth

I wanted my McCain banner up and wanted to support my chosen candidate BUT I also knew that I was asking for it in Chicago and I never voiced my political opinions again. That was a visage of the old liberal me. I don't have to be ostentatious in order to support a candidate or a cause. Lesson learned.

428 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:22:15pm

re: #425 JCM

Just North of Seattle, Furry is farther south.

What are y'all tryin' to say, eh? ;)

429 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:22:29pm

So, I'm watching C-SPAN three in which this author James Carroll is talking about his experience growing up in the Pentagon and then calling 9/11 a criminal act and some other strange mental gymnastics.

Must investigate. . . .

430 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:22:51pm

re: #422 SanFranciscoZionist

Yes legally in Vermont, they lived in Mass.

431 Sharmuta  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:23:11pm

re: #416 Salamantis

What you said.

432 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:23:28pm

re: #421 sngnsgt

Global whoreming alert:

UPDATE: 50-below sets Maine record

news.mainetoday.com

Perhaps "mother nature" was displeased with the way the Senators from Maine voted on the stimulus bill.

433 FurryOldGuyJeans  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:24:37pm

re: #420 Afrocity

I am pro civil union. The only problem I have with gay marriage is the two lesbian couples i have known that broke up with their partners yet simply moved out without the need for a divorce. If the divorce or lack of it is no big deal, why is it such a big deal to get married?

If they are so eager for the veneer of marriage they need the stain of divorce that goes along with it. (Puns are intended)

434 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:24:42pm

re: #425 JCM

I like Seattle. Nice town, good food, lots of good music and art galleries.
Scenic too. I stayed there about 6 weeks in 2007 working on a musical.

435 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:24:44pm
From WhyIslam.org:

Imagine this scenario, for it is real: two antagonists locked in a grim power struggle. And another: two or more other competitors, rivals in a race for high stakes, a race to determine the course of their entire life. At race’s end, the prizes for winning include compliments, telling glances, and First Prize, a wedding ring. Unwanted "prizes" along the way may include physical assault, countless violations of body and soul. The protagonists of these scenarios are all around us; they are modern man and modern woman, and woman vs. woman.

From time immemorial, against this harsh horizon of human relations, the "battle of the sexes" has raged. But never has "Sexual Politics" been so virulent as today. Feminism becomes polarization along gender barriers. To offset increased competition for a mate, extreme nudity splashes itself unchecked. Fear and suspicion on both sides lurk; commitments are tepid, or all too fragile.

Man. I'm looking at my wedding ring now, wondering how on earth I survived all all that and got First Prize.

436 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:25:15pm

re: #427 Afrocity

I state my beliefs simply.. ok, that and an NRA sticker on my car.

437 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:25:21pm

re: #429 ggt

Is he a 9-11 denier? They make me sick.

438 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:25:53pm

weet dreams all!

439 ggt  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:26:46pm

re: #437 Afrocity

No, not a denier, just seems to be one of those who can't grasp that with the gift of free will, some people will choose evil.

440 Pvt Bin Jammin  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:27:05pm

re: #438 ggt

Nite, GGT. Have a great day tomorrow!

441 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:27:55pm

re: #438 ggt

Nite ggt

442 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:28:46pm

re: #420 Afrocity

I am pro civil union. The only problem I have with gay marriage is the two lesbian couples i have known that broke up with their partners yet simply moved out without the need for a divorce. If the divorce or lack of it is no big deal, why is it such a big deal to get married?

Well, since fully half of heterosexual marriages end in divorce, I don't thin that the recognition of gay civil unions is likely to do more damage to the institution than straights are already doing to it themselves (Britney Spears' 55 hour Las Vegas marriage, for example). And the legal recognition of stable and committed gay households can, in my view, only serve to strengthen America's social and moral fabric.

I also think that gays should be allowed to serve openly in the US military. European and Canadian militaries do not suffer unit cohesions problems because of it, and we have discharged many gays that possess critical skills as far as our present antijihadi efforts go (for instance, Arabic, Farsi, Pashtun and Urdu translators). Allowing gays to openly serve also prevents them from being blackmailed by hostile agents over their concealed sexual orientation. I happen to agree with Barry Goldwater that the issue should not be whether or not military personnel ARE straight, but rather whether or not they can SHOOT straight.

443 JCM  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:29:21pm

re: #426 FurryOldGuyJeans

South of Seattle, yes. Nearby we have a bunch of soldiers and airmen that love to play with their toys a lot; Ft. Lewis and McChord.

My Mother in Law is in Steilicoom. Love listening to the 155s at night.

444 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:29:31pm

I love your avatar rawmuse.
My 3 sons.

445 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:30:06pm

re: #430 Afrocity

Yes legally in Vermont, they lived in Mass.

They may not have figured that they needed a divorce since the marriage wasn't valid in the state they were in. Dunno. The lack of interstate recognition leads to people doing odd things that straight couples wouldn't, because straight couples would get into trouble w/taxes and such. Also, I know that some couples have actually had trouble getting divorces, because the legislation covering them is separate from that covering marriage. Canada, I think they had some trouble with that.

Complicated stuff. I would just urge you not to make decisions about same-sex marriage based on a few people's batty behavior. If we judged straight marriage on the choices some people we know have made...heck, I'd vote to ban it! And I'm in one.

446 Erik The Red  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:30:27pm

Morning/Evening Lizards. I woke up this morning hoping yesterday was a nightmare. Logged onto the web and realised that it was for real.

I stopped believing in the boggieman a long time ago, but I think 44 is going to be my new nightmare.

447 rawmuse  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:31:07pm

re: #444 Afrocity

I love your avatar rawmuse.
My 3 sons.

thank you, dear. Actually that is Pierce Brosnan in "Mars Attacks"
But the look is the same.
Your is nice too.

448 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:32:48pm

re: #442 Salamantis

How does the army know if you are gay anyway?

Okay the bigot in me is coming out... I believe in equality for all but ...well...I feel gays in the military would be a distraction.

449 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:32:58pm

re: #439 ggt

No, not a denier, just seems to be one of those who can't grasp that with the gift of free will, some people will choose evil.

What did we do to make jihadis destroy the Twin Towers? What do women do to make rapists rape them? What do children do to cause pedophiles to molest them? What did the Jews do to make the Nazis gas them?

All variations on a sick and twisted blame-the-victim theme that makes my gorge rise whenever I encounter it.

450 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:34:48pm

re: #417 slokat

Since guns have been mentioned, here's a fun pic - Girls with Guns

Pandering to The Behemoth like that will get you nothing. Except an up-ding.

451 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:38:02pm

re: #445 SanFranciscoZionist

I just don't like the gay movement's approach before or after election day. Like the whole Sarah Palin in effigy stunt. That was offensive to me as a black woman. Or how the LGBT community blamed blacks for Prop 8 and stomped that woman's cross in the ground. Or the two teachers in SF that took the class to the lesbian wedding. I would be furious as a parent.

452 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:39:06pm

re: #448 Afrocity

How does the army know if you are gay anyway?

Okay the bigot in me is coming out... I believe in equality for all but ...well...I feel gays in the military would be a distraction.

In many cases, they broke the don't ask - don't tell rules, and actively investigated the sexual orientation of military personnel.

Why should gays in the US military be a distraction, when they aren't a distraction in the militaries of Europe, Canada or Israel?

I just can't abide bigotry, be it sexist, racist, religious or homophobic, and do not think that membership in any of those discriminated-against groups gives anyone a free pass to indulge in prejudice against any of the others.

As Paul Ricoeur said: The one thing that tolerant people cannot in good conscience tolerate is the intolerance of others.

453 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:43:03pm

re: #451 Afrocity

I just don't like the gay movement's approach before or after election day. Like the whole Sarah Palin in effigy stunt. That was offensive to me as a black woman. Or how the LGBT community blamed blacks for Prop 8 and stomped that woman's cross in the ground. Or the two teachers in SF that took the class to the lesbian wedding. I would be furious as a parent.

Individual actions by fringers from every group cross the line, but I would no more tar the gay community at large with the actions of an offensive minority within them than I would tar conservatives or Republicans at large with the actions of a minority socon bigots who embrace the labels.

454 Afrocity  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:43:33pm

re: #452 Salamantis

Fair enough. I am not perfect and can't change how I feel.
Not my cause.
That is something else I learned this year that helped me leave the Democratic Party.

Gay marriage- I don't care. I am not gay
Abortion- I am pro choice but I know that life begins at conception. Menawhile I will never have an abortion. Leave it for the young ones to worry about .

455 BlueCanuck  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:49:05pm

testing, testing.

/you all pass. :)

456 Salamantis  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:49:46pm

re: #454 Afrocity

Fair enough. I am not perfect and can't change how I feel.
Not my cause.
That is something else I learned this year that helped me leave the Democratic Party.

Gay marriage- I don't care. I am not gay
Abortion- I am pro choice but I know that life begins at conception. Menawhile I will never have an abortion. Leave it for the young ones to worry about .

That's what pro-choice is all about; individual women can choose to have abortions, or choose not to. The US is not pro-abortion, but pro-choice; China, which legally mandates abortion, is pro-abortion.

In a free society, alternatives that we might not ourselves ever choose should nevertheless be kept open as options for those who should have the freedom to choose differently from ourselves. Only in totalitarianisms and theocracies are all human actions either mandated or forbidden.

457 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:50:11pm

re: #427 Afrocity

I wanted my McCain banner up and wanted to support my chosen candidate BUT I also knew that I was asking for it in Chicago and I never voiced my political opinions again. That was a visage of the old liberal me. I don't have to be ostentatious in order to support a candidate or a cause. Lesson learned.

I understand. It is an idealistic viewpoint of mine to think that political differences should be limited to verbal debate, when the fact is that mentally twisted people will take such differences to a disgusting and unnecessary level that you and many others have experienced. You are most right to be guarded with you opinions in such an environment.

With that said, you are not at fault for what happened to your dog. The onus of blame lays squarely on the shoulders of those who made the choice to poison your dog.

458 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Feb 10, 2009 11:56:45pm

re: #451 Afrocity

I just don't like the gay movement's approach before or after election day. Like the whole Sarah Palin in effigy stunt. That was offensive to me as a black woman. Or how the LGBT community blamed blacks for Prop 8 and stomped that woman's cross in the ground. Or the two teachers in SF that took the class to the lesbian wedding. I would be furious as a parent.

Gay folks, like striaght folks, can do lousy things. The people who put up the Palin effigy are ***holes. They would be if they were straight. And I'm sure plenty of their straight friends thought their display was awesome. Anyone who attacks an old lady and throws her cross to the ground--well, there are no words.

But I don't want to see people like that take away respect for same-sex couples I know who would never do such things.

459 [deleted]  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 12:00:40am
460 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 12:06:50am

re: #459 Iron Fist

When gays in the military was heating up as a topic in national discourse, I had a gay friend (I won't use his name). One day this Major? with the national guard came out as a lesbian, so she was being discharged, and the media, of course, was all over it. My friend asked a simple question: why couldn't she just shut up and do her job. That is, essentially, the way I feel about it. If it's not being a problem, then it's not a problem. If it gets in the way of doing your job, you need to move on to a job that better fits you. You may not get to blow things up and kill people, but that is part of the choice you made.

The same thing is, really, true for straight members of the military. If a man is continuing to make unwanted sexual advances toward subordinates, then he needs to leave. Even if the advances are welcomed, he may still need to leave in order to prevent the appearance of impropriaty.

This is a bigger deal in the military where tensions in a unit can compromise unit cohesion, leading to deaths or even failure of the mission, than might happen in civillian life. The military lives by a significantly different set of rules than the average citizen has to ever put up with. I think that it was Robert Heinlein who said something to the effect that DIs could abuse you in training in ways that would get them incarcerated in civilian life, and, instead of jail, be given a medal for it. I'm sure he worded it better.

Military personell have to live by a harsher, more demanding code of ethics precisely because they are in the Military. They aare being put in charge of some of the deadliest weapons ever created on earth. H-tipped ICBMs can reach around the world and destroy a city, and who knows what nasty syurprises are being cooked up in bioweapons research?

Anyway, that is my take on it.

Sexual harassment of or even welcomed advances upon others is not equivalent to simply acknowledging one's own gender orientation. The first is action; the second is only speech. And as I mentioned before, the militaries of Europe, canada and Israel do not suffer unit cohesion problems due to their gay personel, and some of them are nuclear powers as we are.

461 der_ich  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 12:56:05am

Wow I just love the missing link between the creationism and the intelligent design text book (~1:25 into the video). An intelligent designer would not create a whole new book, he would use evolution and ergo just change one word to accomplish the same goal. Seems like god IS intelligent but also a bit lazy if you ask me.

462 logboy  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 1:26:55am

Dammit Charles!

I was planning on going to bed early tonight, and then you had to put up this video.

463 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:03:39am

re: #461 der_ich

Wow I just love the missing link between the creationism and the intelligent design text book (~1:25 into the video). An intelligent designer would not create a whole new book, he would use evolution and ergo just change one word to accomplish the same goal. Seems like god IS intelligent but also a bit lazy if you ask me.

I rather suspect that the designers of that textbook, besides not being gods, were both unintelligent AND lazy...;~)

cdesign proponentsists indeed!

464 Power Armored Lizardoid  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:29:45am

Meh, just because some people are a bit wacked in what they believe in doesn't mean I shouldn't continue to believe that God created the universe and human life. Exactly how he did it I won't find out 'til I talk to Him face to Face...and since that probably won't happen 'til after I'm dead, I'm not going to worry about it too much. If believing in God (or that He created all that is) makes me unpopular here at LGF (or anywhere else) so be it. Life is about making the tough decisions...not some dang popularity contest.

God bless Charles, my fellow LGF'ers, and anyone else willing to stand against our increasingly socialist government and the homicidal Mooslim nutbags...

465 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 4:20:01am

re: #464 Power Armored Lizardoid

Um- that's not the issue. Did you even watch the video? Did you read the link under it? This isn't about your personal religious beliefs. This about other people undermining science education so they can push their idea of religion on other people's kids in public schools.

466 Oh no...Sand People!  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 4:47:39am

re: #464 Power Armored Lizardoid

Meh, just because some people are a bit wacked in what they believe in doesn't mean I shouldn't continue to believe that God created the universe and human life. Exactly how he did it I won't find out 'til I talk to Him face to Face...and since that probably won't happen 'til after I'm dead, I'm not going to worry about it too much. If believing in God (or that He created all that is) makes me unpopular here at LGF (or anywhere else) so be it. Life is about making the tough decisions...not some dang popularity contest.

God bless Charles, my fellow LGF'ers, and anyone else willing to stand against our increasingly socialist government and the homicidal Mooslim nutbags...

Believing in God isn't the problem. I am a 'creationist' but not of the 'ex nihilo' variety. It's the megaphone that the 'Young Earthers' have commandeered that is ruining it. Now people are on default that when they hear 'christian' they knee-jerk to D.I. and I.D. and Young Earth. That is a big disservice to their cause and to the Bible itself. Especially now that an issue that THEY PUSHED is now being used as a 'victim card' when people push back. It is a manufactured victimology of their own making.

Now, if, after I die I am given the opportunity to see that the Earth was literally 6000 years old...well. Guess I'll change my mind.

467 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:48:40am

re: #466 Oh no...Sand People!

Especially now that an issue that THEY PUSHED is now being used as a 'victim card' when people push back. It is a manufactured victimology of their own making.

That's a great point. Like a thief who isn't sorry they stole, but is very, very sorry they got caught.

468 Land Shark  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 8:01:10am

re: #466 Oh no...Sand People!

An excellent observation. I'm a creationist and believer in Intelligent Design, but I also recognize it's a matter of faith. Science can not prove it or disprove it, so it does not belong in the science classroom. The deceptive tactics of these people is what gets me the most. Aren't they supposed to be Christians, you know, be up front and honest? I don't see that from them. It's like the end justifies the means as far as their concerned.

The fact is they can do incalculable damage to science education and must be stopped.

469 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 8:12:53am

re: #468 Land Shark

I'm a creationist and believer in Intelligent Design

Could you elaborate? Do you reject evolution?

470 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 9:00:43am

re: #468 Land Shark

I was going to comment that I started to watch the program, but frankly find it frustrating and somewhat depressing at the same time. There truly is no point in arguing with those who's comments are shown in the program, supporting creationism. One can do nothing except oppose them at every level and hope they can eventually be forced to limit their spread of ignorance to their own children (and let evolution take it's course after that).

Then I see the post above, which is just as cognitively dissonant. Someone who can actually justify to themselves the belief that our reality is really like something out of The Matrix movies, and all that that implies.

Land Shark just wants to be loved, by creationists, by ID nuts and by Lizards, so he/she says whatever seems appropriate at the time, regardless of how stupid it sounds.

471 Ty85719  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 9:43:21am

The show was kicked off in perfect context: the burning of a piece of art

When will they be honest and bluntly state that they want to teach Judeo-Christian creationism, rather than refering to vague references of some ambiguous "intelligent creator"?

472 Land Shark  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 9:51:16am

re: #470 Naso Tang

You don't know me from Adam and yet you already know I want to be loved by everyone. I'm sure the creationists who want to shove ID into science classrooms don't like me me much because I oppose them. So much about me wanting to be loved by everyone. You must be one of those know it all mediums I hear so much about.

I believe evolution is God's design, which is the essence of Intelligent Design from where I stand. I believe evolution is a mechanism, a scientific process, if you will, that God created. I don't see why believing in one automatically disqualifies one from believing in the other. I don't believe in creation the way the Biblical creationists do, that's for sure. And I don't believe something that's a matter of faith, like Intelligent Design Creationism is, should be shoved into the science classroom. Have I made myself clear?

You sound like those absolutists on both sides of this debate, either you're an evolution believing atheist or a creationist believing in fairy tales.

473 Land Shark  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 9:53:45am

re: #469 Sharmuta

See my reply above to Naso Tang Who Knows All, Sees All.

474 Ty85719  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 9:55:14am

That evolution occurs is a FACT - how it occurs remains the theory. They continue to use the cult-like term, "darwinism" to degrade the science and, simultaneously, ignore the 200 years of scientific progress.

475 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 10:11:27am

What the school board did here was very wrong, but the knee jerk reaction by Judge Jones is even worse. Our laws should not favor one philosophy over another, but rather support the freedom of inquiry as well as the freedom of religion. The Dover court decision is contrary to the First Amendment in that it favors the establishment of the religion of Secular Humanism over religions that embrace the idea of a Creator.

476 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 10:23:19am

re: #468 Land Shark

I'm a creationist and believer in Intelligent Design, but I also recognize it's a matter of faith. Science can not prove it or disprove it, so it does not belong in the science classroom.

I would not be so hasty to conclude that Intelligent Design does not belong in the science classroom. Many theories of Intelligent Design can be tested in that they make empirical predictions that can be falsified. The problem is that Religion is a broader discipline of study and encompasses science (empirical knowledge) whereas Science is more limited in its scope, restricting itself only to the empirical. This makes it frustrating for the pure scientist who believes only in the physical world when he attempts to understand someone who believes in both a physical and spiritual world.

477 Charles Johnson  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 10:33:42am

re: #476 LoveOneAnother

Many theories of Intelligent Design can be tested in that they make empirical predictions that can be falsified.

Name one.

478 Charles Johnson  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 10:49:33am

< ... sound of crickets ... >

479 Land Shark  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 10:52:17am

re: #476 LoveOneAnother

The problem with ID in a scientific environment is the fact that at some point there's a "and here God did this or that" moment. In other words, faith. This is not something that the scientific method can prove or disprove. Sure, we can have all kinds of interesting and logical discussions and debates about it, but none of them is a scientific process.

Science's focus on the purely physical world is a good thing. There, things can be measured and studied, and even experimented on. The Scientific Method can not be applied to the spiritual world. Science can't prove or disprove the existence of God, or that he did what those of us who believe, well, believe he did.

My desire to keep Intelligent Design Creationism out of the science classroom is based on the fact that science works best when left alone to be science. I shudder to think what would have happened to all the great advances of science we've seen over the centuries without the spirit of free scientific inquiry.

480 Charles Johnson  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 11:05:49am

re: #475 LoveOneAnother

What the school board did here was very wrong, but the knee jerk reaction by Judge Jones is even worse.

This is complete nonsense. The trial lasted forty days, and Judge Jones' decision was 139 pages long, exhaustively reasoned. To call it a "knee jerk reaction" is either: 1) ignorant, or 2) deliberately dishonest.

Here's the decision. You clearly haven't read a single word of it:

[Link: en.wikisource.org...]

481 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 11:09:18am

re: #472 Land Shark

You don't know me from Adam and yet you already know I want to be loved by everyone.

I only know you from your words, that is true, and those words sound like you don't know you either.

I believe evolution is God's design, which is the essence of Intelligent Design from where I stand. I believe evolution is a mechanism, a scientific process, if you will, that God created. I don't see why believing in one automatically disqualifies one from believing in the other. I don't believe in creation the way the Biblical creationists do, that's for sure. And I don't believe something that's a matter of faith, like Intelligent Design Creationism is, should be shoved into the science classroom. Have I made myself clear?

Clearer this time; but why you persist in being coy about the creationist and ID stuff I don't know. You could simply state, like many here, that you believe in God and reality as it appears. Instead you say that you are a creationist and IDer, knowing full well what that implies. Those terms DO NOT mean what you try to describe.

You sound like those absolutists on both sides of this debate, either you're an evolution believing atheist or a creationist believing in fairy tales.

What does atheism have to do with the reality of evolution? You are playing with words, having them mean one thing in one sentence and something else in another.

482 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 11:12:59am

re: #474 Ty85719

That evolution occurs is a FACT - how it occurs remains the theory. They continue to use the cult-like term, "darwinism" to degrade the science and, simultaneously, ignore the 200 years of scientific progress.

What do you mean by "remains the theory"? If you meant to say "IS the theory" then you make sense, if not you may be confused.

483 MJBrutus  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 1:27:14pm

re: #32 Afrocity

What is the Conservative position?

I would state is as such: Follow the frickin' Constitution, including the establishment clause!

484 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:26:32pm

re: #477 Charles

Name one.

For example, a young earth model based upon Genesis which posits the earth is less than 10,000 years old makes a grossly different prediction concerning the results of empirical clocks.

485 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:30:44pm

re: #473 Land Shark

If you accept evolution, you're not a creationist. Creationists reject evolution.

If you believe in God and accept the veracity of evolution, then you're not a believer in intelligent design. You are confusing ID with Theistic evolution.

Confusing the terms is unhelpful, which is why I asked you to clarify your position.

486 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:31:14pm

re: #484 LoveOneAnother

That's the dumbest thing I've heard yet on these threads.

487 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:33:18pm

re: #479 Land Shark

The problem with ID in a scientific environment is the fact that at some point there's a "and here God did this or that" moment.

This is true only if you believe the propoganda from the evolutionists who want to shut out competing ideas. If a scientist follows the type of science outlined by Karl Popper and J.R. Platt's classic "Strong Inference" methodology, he is willing to make risky theories which can be falsified, even if the original source of many ideas in the theory is from a document whose source is the Creator. It isn't about testing the supernatural (that is the false claim of the atheistic evolutionist), but rather it is about using empirical tests to refute tenets of an Intelligent Design model of origins.

488 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:35:23pm

re: #486 Sharmuta

That's the dumbest thing I've heard yet on these threads.

What? You don't think you can use empirical clocks to falsify the young earth tenet?

489 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:38:41pm

re: #487 LoveOneAnother

Empirical tests HAVE been used to refute the claims of ID- mainly irreducible complexity.

Irreducible Complexity Demystified

BTW- Popper supported evolution:

Nevertheless, I have changed my mind about the testability and logical status of the theory of natural selection; and I am glad to have an opportunity to make a recantation. My recantation may, I hope, contribute a little to the understanding of the status of natural selection.

-Karl Popper.

490 Charles Johnson  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:40:19pm

re: #484 LoveOneAnother

For example, a young earth model based upon Genesis which posits the earth is less than 10,000 years old makes a grossly different prediction concerning the results of empirical clocks.

You claimed this:

Many theories of Intelligent Design can be tested in that they make empirical predictions that can be falsified.

I'm still waiting for you to back up that claim. What you just posted is a complete non sequitur.

491 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:47:47pm

re: #480 Charles

This is complete nonsense. The trial lasted forty days, and Judge Jones' decision was 139 pages long, exhaustively reasoned. To call it a "knee jerk reaction" is either: 1) ignorant, or 2) deliberately dishonest.

Here's the decision. You clearly haven't read a single word of it:

Sorry, but you now are resorting to ad hominem hubris. I read every word of the decision when it came out. I also downloaded and read the transcripts.

The reason I call it a knee jerk reaction is that Jones was so offended by the dishonesty of the Creationists that he went too far and decided that he would arbitrate the entire concept of Intelligent Design for everyone and not just adjudicate this particular case. It would be analogous to a Judge encountering Dawson's Piltdown man fiasco and getting so upset that he declared evolution was atheism in disguise and could not be taught in the classroom.

492 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:53:02pm

re: #490 Charles

I'm still waiting for you to back up that claim. What you just posted is a complete non sequitur.

I may have answered briefly, but it is not a non sequitur. What exactly are you expecting? I have no idea of your level of knowledge. Are you expecting me to lay out an entire theory in a web blog? Surely you are familiar with some theories that invoke the young earth concept without it being necessary for me to write a book here.

493 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:55:49pm

re: #489 Sharmuta

Empirical tests HAVE been used to refute the claims of ID- mainly irreducible complexity.

Irreducible Complexity Demystified

Exactly my point! You can't have it both ways. If empirical tests have refuted the claims of a theory, then the theory is scientifically testable. It is incongruent to claim on the one hand that a theory has been falsified by empirical tests in science and then claim on the other hand that it is a theory that cannot tested by science.

494 Charles Johnson  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:56:18pm

re: #492 LoveOneAnother

I may have answered briefly, but it is not a non sequitur. What exactly are you expecting? I have no idea of your level of knowledge. Are you expecting me to lay out an entire theory in a web blog? Surely you are familiar with some theories that invoke the young earth concept without it being necessary for me to write a book here.

You claimed this:

Many theories of Intelligent Design can be tested in that they make empirical predictions that can be falsified.

Name one prediction made by "intelligent design" that can be falsified.

495 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 2:56:39pm

re: #491 LoveOneAnother

No- the experts for intelligent design showed to the Judge that there was no science behind their "theory".

496 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:04:31pm

re: #493 LoveOneAnother

Exactly my point! You can't have it both ways. If empirical tests have refuted the claims of a theory, then the theory is scientifically testable. It is incongruent to claim on the one hand that a theory has been falsified by empirical tests in science and then claim on the other hand that it is a theory that cannot tested by science.

When a scientific hypothesis is tested and found lacking and is utterly debunked, that doesn't mean the hypothesis stands because it's testifiable- it means the hypothesis is refuted, bogus, not a theory, not even a hypothesis. It means it's rejected and the proponents must find another hypothesis. Unless they're IDers- then they can claim it's testifiable. What rubbish.

497 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:09:59pm

re: #494 Charles

Name one prediction made by "intelligent design" that can be falsified.

We seem to be talking past each other. We probably are working with different definitions of terms. Or maybe you don't understand what a scientific theory is. A theory is comprised of many tenets which attempt to explain all observable data. A good theory will make empirical predictions. For example, Einstein's theory of relativity predicted that light would be affected by gravity, and that this could be observed during an ecclipse of the sun, at which time stars near the sun would appear to shift in their position as the light from them bent around the sun. The prediction is not the theory per se, but a tenet of the theory. Einstein's theory could have been falsified if the star's position did not appear to shift. Instead, the shift confirmed the theory. In the same way, there are theories of origins which invoke an Intelligent Designer. Some of these models posit a young earth and make empirical predictions which are falsifiable by empirical data. If the theory is falsifiable, then it is scientifically testable. Don't confuse this with the idea of testing for the idea of an Intelligent Designer. Maybe that is what you have in mind. We don't directly test for an Intelligent Designer any more than we would directly test for Relativity.

498 LoveOneAnother  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:17:06pm

re: #496 Sharmuta

When a scientific hypothesis is tested and found lacking and is utterly debunked, that doesn't mean the hypothesis stands because it's testifiable- it means the hypothesis is refuted, bogus, not a theory, not even a hypothesis. It means it's rejected and the proponents must find another hypothesis. Unless they're IDers- then they can claim it's testifiable. What rubbish.

Testifiable? You mean testable? Please don't get sloppy with words or we will really muddy the waters of misunderstanding here.

A falsified theory should be rejected. I agree with that. Any Intelligent Design theory that has been falsified should be in the same camp as Lamarkian Evolution, something which has through empirical testing been shown to be false.

However, if we claim in the same breath that the idea has been falsified by science and also that it is not science because it cannot be evaluated scientifically, then we are LYING! When people lie, they are hiding something. Caveat Emptor!

499 Mr Secul  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:17:48pm

re: #497 LoveOneAnother

In the same way, there are theories of origins which invoke an Intelligent Designer. Some of these models posit a young earth and make empirical predictions which are falsifiable by empirical data. If the theory is falsifiable, then it is scientifically testable.

How old is the earth? Do you have a ballpark figure?

Can you give examples of the falsifiable predictions made by the young earth models?

500 Charles Johnson  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:18:37pm

re: #497 LoveOneAnother

You wrote this:

Many theories of Intelligent Design can be tested in that they make empirical predictions that can be falsified.

Name one empirical prediction made by "intelligent design" that is falsifiable. I'm not impressed by your thrashing around.

501 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:21:29pm

re: #498 LoveOneAnother

You chide Charles for his use of theory, then chide me, but turn around and claim ID has theories. No they don't. They have hypotheses- one's which have been utterly debunked. It's not a theory if they don't even have a working hypothesis.

Hypocrite.

502 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 3:49:31pm

re: #500 Charles

You wrote this:

Name one empirical prediction made by "intelligent design" that is falsifiable. I'm not impressed by your thrashing around.

You haven't gotten an answer. Imagine that!

503 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 4:52:09pm

re: #475 LoveOneAnother

What the school board did here was very wrong, but the knee jerk reaction by Judge Jones is even worse. Our laws should not favor one philosophy over another, but rather support the freedom of inquiry as well as the freedom of religion. The Dover court decision is contrary to the First Amendment in that it favors the establishment of the religion of Secular Humanism over religions that embrace the idea of a Creator.

No, empirical science, which restricts itself to the physical domain, does not address the issue of a metaphysical creator one way or another. People are free to inquire, but schoolchildren in a public high school science classroom are there to be taught empirical science, not dogmatic religion. You are free to profess your religion in church and in the town square; what you are NOT free to do is to illegitimately entangle religion and civil governance by mandating the indoctrination of other peoples' children in your pet creationist dogmas in public high school science class; such an action interferes with THEIR freedom of religion, and favors one set of religious beliefs - yours - over others; it therefore violates the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America in two distinct respects.

504 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 4:56:16pm

re: #476 LoveOneAnother

I would not be so hasty to conclude that Intelligent Design does not belong in the science classroom. Many theories of Intelligent Design can be tested in that they make empirical predictions that can be falsified. The problem is that Religion is a broader discipline of study and encompasses science (empirical knowledge) whereas Science is more limited in its scope, restricting itself only to the empirical. This makes it frustrating for the pure scientist who believes only in the physical world when he attempts to understand someone who believes in both a physical and spiritual world.

I agree with Charles that ID, being metaphysical, cannot be tested by empirical science, which exclusively operates in the physical realm, and refrains from making metaphysical assertions. Religion does not circumscribe both the physical and the metaphysical; its domain is limited to the supernatural, and when it tries to make metapphysically based pronouncements about the physical world, they have been empirically refuted.

505 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:01:48pm

re: #484 LoveOneAnother

For example, a young earth model based upon Genesis which posits the earth is less than 10,000 years old makes a grossly different prediction concerning the results of empirical clocks.

YEC pronouncements have indeed been empirically falsified, because they attempted to intrude into the domain of empirical science, and have been refuted by means of counterfactual empirical evidence (radiomatric dating, artifactual retroviral DNA, the geological and fossil records, etc.)
But the presence or absence of a deific designer is empirically untestable., and remains a religious, and not a scientific, contention.

506 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:06:22pm

re: #487 LoveOneAnother

This is true only if you believe the propoganda from the evolutionists who want to shut out competing ideas. If a scientist follows the type of science outlined by Karl Popper and J.R. Platt's classic "Strong Inference" methodology, he is willing to make risky theories which can be falsified, even if the original source of many ideas in the theory is from a document whose source is the Creator. It isn't about testing the supernatural (that is the false claim of the atheistic evolutionist), but rather it is about using empirical tests to refute tenets of an Intelligent Design model of origins.

Nope. It's simply about experimentally investigating physical phenomena in order to empirically ascertain what is and is not the case. If there is no experimental result that would serve to falsify a contention, then that contention is not scientific. And Karl Popper had no problems with evolutionary theory, btw.

507 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:09:17pm

re: #488 LoveOneAnother

What? You don't think you can use empirical clocks to falsify the young earth tenet?

YEC contentions, however, are about the physical world, and are empirically testable (and have been found wanting), unlike the metaphysical postulations of a designing deity, which are empirically UNtestable.

508 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:12:35pm

re: #491 LoveOneAnother

Sorry, but you now are resorting to ad hominem hubris. I read every word of the decision when it came out. I also downloaded and read the transcripts.

The reason I call it a knee jerk reaction is that Jones was so offended by the dishonesty of the Creationists that he went too far and decided that he would arbitrate the entire concept of Intelligent Design for everyone and not just adjudicate this particular case. It would be analogous to a Judge encountering Dawson's Piltdown man fiasco and getting so upset that he declared evolution was atheism in disguise and could not be taught in the classroom.

No, he conclusively demonstrated that ID was a PR propaganda mislabeling of creationism that was perpetrated by the Disco Institute in a cynical attempt to circumvent judicial prohibitions against teaching creationism in public high school science classes, and he furthermore demonstrated that its assertions were pseudoscientific and unsupported by a single shred of empirical evidence.

509 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:15:42pm

re: #492 LoveOneAnother

I may have answered briefly, but it is not a non sequitur. What exactly are you expecting? I have no idea of your level of knowledge. Are you expecting me to lay out an entire theory in a web blog? Surely you are familiar with some theories that invoke the young earth concept without it being necessary for me to write a book here.

Try this on for size:

[Link: ase.tufts.edu...]

Excerpt:

Instead of spending more than $1 million a year on publishing books and articles for non-scientists and on other public relations efforts, the Discovery Institute should finance its own peer-reviewed electronic journal. This way, the organization could live up to its self-professed image: the doughty defenders of brave iconoclasts bucking the establishment.

For now, though, the theory they are promoting is exactly what George Gilder, a long-time affiliate of the Discovery Institute, has said it is: "Intelligent design itself does not have any content."

Since there is no content, there is no "controversy" to teach about in biology class. But here is a good topic for a high school course on current events and politics: Is intelligent design a hoax? And if so, how
was it perpetrated?

510 Sharmuta  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:18:12pm

re: #491 LoveOneAnother

Sorry, but you now are resorting to ad hominem hubris. I read every word of the decision when it came out. I also downloaded and read the transcripts.

The reason I call it a knee jerk reaction is that Jones was so offended by the dishonesty of the Creationists that he went too far and decided that he would arbitrate the entire concept of Intelligent Design for everyone and not just adjudicate this particular case. It would be analogous to a Judge encountering Dawson's Piltdown man fiasco and getting so upset that he declared evolution was atheism in disguise and could not be taught in the classroom.

Two words: cdesign proponentsists.

511 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:20:28pm

re: #493 LoveOneAnother

Exactly my point! You can't have it both ways. If empirical tests have refuted the claims of a theory, then the theory is scientifically testable. It is incongruent to claim on the one hand that a theory has been falsified by empirical tests in science and then claim on the other hand that it is a theory that cannot tested by science.

ID offers no theory of its own; all it does is futilely endeavor to discredit a genuine scientific theory: evolution. When its attempted criticisms are shown to be empirically groundless, their discrediting does not provide any basis for considering the nonexistent theory of ID to be scientific. How can nothing, or at least nothing empirically testable, be considered to be scientific? It can't; it remains religious dogma transparently draped in pseudoscientific garb, as Judge Jones correctly determined.

512 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:25:35pm

re: #497 LoveOneAnother

We seem to be talking past each other. We probably are working with different definitions of terms. Or maybe you don't understand what a scientific theory is. A theory is comprised of many tenets which attempt to explain all observable data. A good theory will make empirical predictions. For example, Einstein's theory of relativity predicted that light would be affected by gravity, and that this could be observed during an ecclipse of the sun, at which time stars near the sun would appear to shift in their position as the light from them bent around the sun. The prediction is not the theory per se, but a tenet of the theory. Einstein's theory could have been falsified if the star's position did not appear to shift. Instead, the shift confirmed the theory. In the same way, there are theories of origins which invoke an Intelligent Designer. Some of these models posit a young earth and make empirical predictions which are falsifiable by empirical data. If the theory is falsifiable, then it is scientifically testable. Don't confuse this with the idea of testing for the idea of an Intelligent Designer. Maybe that is what you have in mind. We don't directly test for an Intelligent Designer any more than we would directly test for Relativity.

That which is empirically testable, and has been tested and found wanting, usually by the presentation of counterfactual empirical evidence, is empirically untrue (think astrology, alchemy, and flat earth geocentrism). That which cannot be empirically tested is supernatural and metaphysical, and lies outside the natural and physical domain of empirical science.

Neither the untestable nor the empirically falsified can be considered to be science; the first is religion and the second is untruth.

513 Salamantis  Wed, Feb 11, 2009 5:27:25pm

re: #498 LoveOneAnother

Testifiable? You mean testable? Please don't get sloppy with words or we will really muddy the waters of misunderstanding here.

A falsified theory should be rejected. I agree with that. Any Intelligent Design theory that has been falsified should be in the same camp as Lamarkian Evolution, something which has through empirical testing been shown to be false.

However, if we claim in the same breath that the idea has been falsified by science and also that it is not science because it cannot be evaluated scientifically, then we are LYING! When people lie, they are hiding something. Caveat Emptor!

Creationists have proffered examples of both untestable assertions and assertions that are testable and have been empirically falsified. They are not the same assertions.

514 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:11:31am

re: #499 Mr Secul

How old is the earth? Do you have a ballpark figure?

Can you give examples of the falsifiable predictions made by the young earth models?

If a theory says that the earth is less than 10,000 years old, which is the number that most young earth models make, then it predicts that our empirical clocks would be in line with this. If we accept the assumptions of radiometric dating, then such a theory has been falsified. The young earth ID position typically questions these assumptions, so the real way for science to address this is to establish the empirical clock. For us to claim that this type of Intelligent Design theory is outside the realm of science is hogwash, unless we are willing to claim that science is unable to date the earth through empirical means. As a scientist, I have a BIG problem with that notion.

515 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:14:59am

re: #500 Charles

You wrote this:

Name one empirical prediction made by "intelligent design" that is falsifiable. I'm not impressed by your thrashing around.

I already have, and there are many others. I am not impressed with how obtuse you are being.

516 Mr Secul  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:59:34am

re: #514 LoveOneAnother

If a theory says that the earth is less than 10,000 years old, which is the number that most young earth models make, then it predicts that our empirical clocks would be in line with this. If we accept the assumptions of radiometric dating, then such a theory has been falsified. The young earth ID position typically questions these assumptions, so the real way for science to address this is to establish the empirical clock. For us to claim that this type of Intelligent Design theory is outside the realm of science is hogwash, unless we are willing to claim that science is unable to date the earth through empirical means. As a scientist, I have a BIG problem with that notion.

Is it your opinion that the earth is young?

I thought that science had 'established the empirical clock'. This wikipedia article states that radiometric dating has been carried out since 1905.

Do you dispute radiometric dating?

I'm not asking if you think that care has to be taken to avoid errors, I'm asking if you really believe that it is so flawed that it hasn't already falsified young earth models?

And then are are varved deposits, especially the Green River deposits that appear to cover a 6 million year period.

I'm not sure what you are arguing.

Are you just saying that YEC could have been considered to be scientific if it hadn't been so completely falsified?

Do you think that it hasn't been falsified?

Or do you say that it has been falsified but its still scientific because it has been shown to be false and therefore falsifiable?

Does the disproof of the young earth theory disprove creationism? surely we have just disproved the idea that the earth is young. This doesn't disprove that the universe was created by some supernatural being/entity.

He/she/it/them could have created the universe about 14 billion years ago.

Isn't ID a separate issue from the age of the earth?

517 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 11:28:16am

re: #501 Sharmuta

You chide Charles for his use of theory, then chide me, but turn around and claim ID has theories. No they don't. They have hypotheses- one's which have been utterly debunked. It's not a theory if they don't even have a working hypothesis.

Hypocrite.

You can claim that the sky is falling all you like, but that does not make it so. I have a theory of origins which includes the idea that a Creator is responsible. There are many hypotheses generated by that theory that require testing.

518 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 11:43:25am

re: #502 Sharmuta

You haven't gotten an answer. Imagine that!

He received an answer, but it was not the answer he was expecting. When a model of origins posits that the earth is relatively young, then empirical clocks should be able to be used to test that theory. When a person cannot admit this simple fact, I question their honesty in dealing with this subject matter, and that hinders further discussion. When they further try to create a propoganda machine claiming no answer was ever given, then I know they have left from discussing science in order to engage in sophistry.

519 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 11:51:46am

re: #503 Salamantis

No, empirical science, which restricts itself to the physical domain, does not address the issue of a metaphysical creator one way or another. People are free to inquire, but schoolchildren in a public high school science classroom are there to be taught empirical science, not dogmatic religion. You are free to profess your religion in church and in the town square; what you are NOT free to do is to illegitimately entangle religion and civil governance by mandating the indoctrination of other peoples' children in your pet creationist dogmas in public high school science class; such an action interferes with THEIR freedom of religion, and favors one set of religious beliefs - yours - over others; it therefore violates the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America in two distinct respects.

I do not agree with mandating pet creationist dogma in public schools. I think Judge Jones was right to stop the reading of that silly statement of dogma in the science classroom. However, he went too far when he thinks that on the basis of what was presented to him he could decide what was science and what was not science. He has provided legal fodder to ban any Creationist or ID theorist from the study of science. Jones has created a situation of indoctrination to only atheistic viewpoints. That is wrong. It hinders the freedom of religious expression and violates the establishment clause. The government now supports the religions of Secular Humanism over theistic religions like Christianity, Islam, and Judaism who hold to theories of origins that include the work of a Creator.

520 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 11:55:57am

re: #504 Salamantis

I agree with Charles that ID, being metaphysical, cannot be tested by empirical science, which exclusively operates in the physical realm, and refrains from making metaphysical assertions. Religion does not circumscribe both the physical and the metaphysical; its domain is limited to the supernatural, and when it tries to make metapphysically based pronouncements about the physical world, they have been empirically refuted.

Your assertion here is ridiculous. I am both a scientist and a theologian. My religion deals with both the spiritual world and the physical world, and you try to persuade me that such is impossible! LOL.

521 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 12:32:20pm

re: #516 Mr Secul

Is it your opinion that the earth is young?

No.

I thought that science had 'established the empirical clock'. This wikipedia article states that radiometric dating has been carried out since 1905.

Do you dispute radiometric dating?

There are assumptions made in radiometric dating, such as a constant decay rate, and no daughter material originally. I have enough reserve about the validity of these assumptions that I have not yet considered the young earth theories falsified simply because of radiometric dating.

And then are are varved deposits, especially the Green River deposits that appear to cover a 6 million year period.

Are you just saying that YEC could have been considered to be scientific if it hadn't been so completely falsified?

No, I am saying that it is wrong to marginalize those who would like to consider the question in a scientific analysis. I have been on fossil digs myself where I have seen the data misrepresented because of the strong evolutionary and uniformitarian bias. Therefore, I read studies with a skeptical eye and want to look at the actual data myself rather than just the interpretation being made. Some studies have claimed sedimentation of millions of years, only to later exhibit polystrate fossils that belie that interpretation, and later radiometric dating contradicted the originally published ones.

Do you think that it hasn't been falsified?

Or do you say that it has been falsified but its still scientific because it has been shown to be false and therefore falsifiable?

I think that YEC theories are some of the most risky ID theories out there, and they are certainly able to be tested by scientists, including those who do not believe in a Creator or want their research to have anything to do with a Creator.

I can respect a scientist who says that a YEC theory has been falsified because of X, Y, Z, but I lose respect for the scientist who claims it is religion rather than science and therefore not worthy to be examined by scientists or talked about in science class.

My perspective is that YEC theories are scientific in the sense that they make empirical predictions that can be tested. If a YEC theory is falsified, then it is a falsified scientific theory, not a theory that has no place in science.

Does the disproof of the young earth theory disprove creationism? surely we have just disproved the idea that the earth is young. This doesn't disprove that the universe was created by some supernatural being/entity.

He/she/it/them could have created the universe about 14 billion years ago.

Right, we have only disproven that particular theory of origins, not all Creationist theories.

Isn't ID a separate issue from the age of the earth?

No, ID includes theories that speak to the age of the earth. However, some ID theories are YEC and some are not.

522 Mr Secul  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 1:14:12pm

re: #521 LoveOneAnother

There are assumptions made in radiometric dating, such as a constant decay rate, and no daughter material originally. I have enough reserve about the validity of these assumptions that I have not yet considered the young earth theories falsified simply because of radiometric dating.

Is there any reason to doubt a constant decay rate? What could influence the decay rates? Is there evidence for changing atomic decay rates?

In your opinion what is a ballpark figure for the age of the earth in a young earth theory?

Are we talking 6,000 years? 10,000 years?

523 LoveOneAnother  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:21:33pm

re: #522 Mr Secul

Is there any reason to doubt a constant decay rate? What could influence the decay rates? Is there evidence for changing atomic decay rates?

In your opinion what is a ballpark figure for the age of the earth in a young earth theory?

Are we talking 6,000 years? 10,000 years?

The Norman and Setterfield paper gives me pause about it. Their asymptotic curve for various estimates of the speed of light over the last 300 years correlates with Bibilical dates for various global events, including the continental division interpreted from the Bible. Gentry also published a paper in Science concerning pleochroic halos that he interpreted as causing questions about the rates of decay in the past being higher. More interesting to me are the double halos Gentry studied in the Colorado Plateau which was published as being strata millions of years old in being laid down, but his study of the halos indicated a period of just 20 years. I still have a lot of questions, but that is what science is all about, considering the questions, forming hypotheses, and then testing them. It makes me sick how all these questions are "off limits" because of the religious implications of the necessity of a Creator should the results of these empirical tests go the "wrong way" in regards to anti-Creationist views.

524 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:37:30pm

re: #519 LoveOneAnother

I do not agree with mandating pet creationist dogma in public schools. I think Judge Jones was right to stop the reading of that silly statement of dogma in the science classroom. However, he went too far when he thinks that on the basis of what was presented to him he could decide what was science and what was not science. He has provided legal fodder to ban any Creationist or ID theorist from the study of science. Jones has created a situation of indoctrination to only atheistic viewpoints. That is wrong. It hinders the freedom of religious expression and violates the establishment clause. The government now supports the religions of Secular Humanism over theistic religions like Christianity, Islam, and Judaism who hold to theories of origins that include the work of a Creator.

Your assertion is ludicrous. Creationists/ID 'theorists' are free to study science to their hearts' desires. They can even pass the courses and obtain science degrees if they answer the test questions right.

No reputable science teacher includes a section on atheism or secular humanism. And they shouldn't include one of creationism/ID, either, as all of those are empirically untestable metaphysical stances

525 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:39:37pm

re: #517 LoveOneAnother

You can claim that the sky is falling all you like, but that does not make it so. I have a theory of origins which includes the idea that a Creator is responsible. There are many hypotheses generated by that theory that require testing.

Please inform me as to how you could possibly empirically test the proposition that the universe was created by a supernatural being.

526 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:40:54pm

re: #514 LoveOneAnother

If a theory says that the earth is less than 10,000 years old, which is the number that most young earth models make, then it predicts that our empirical clocks would be in line with this. If we accept the assumptions of radiometric dating, then such a theory has been falsified. The young earth ID position typically questions these assumptions, so the real way for science to address this is to establish the empirical clock. For us to claim that this type of Intelligent Design theory is outside the realm of science is hogwash, unless we are willing to claim that science is unable to date the earth through empirical means. As a scientist, I have a BIG problem with that notion.

YEC is not ID, which is OEC.

527 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:43:17pm

re: #515 LoveOneAnother

I already have, and there are many others. I am not impressed with how obtuse you are being.

I am not impressed with your self-serving disingenuopusness. You full well know, or should, that ID is OLD Earth creationism, not YOUNG Earth creationism, and as such, your proposed clock thingie doesn't falsify it.

528 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:45:47pm

re: #518 LoveOneAnother

He received an answer, but it was not the answer he was expecting. When a model of origins posits that the earth is relatively young, then empirical clocks should be able to be used to test that theory. When a person cannot admit this simple fact, I question their honesty in dealing with this subject matter, and that hinders further discussion. When they further try to create a propoganda machine claiming no answer was ever given, then I know they have left from discussing science in order to engage in sophistry.

I question either your honesty or your knowledge (take your pick), when you assert that some clock test can falsify ID, which is OLD Earth creationism, and not YOUNG Earth creationism.

529 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:48:16pm

re: #520 LoveOneAnother

Your assertion here is ridiculous. I am both a scientist and a theologian. My religion deals with both the spiritual world and the physical world, and you try to persuade me that such is impossible! LOL.

An argument from claimed but unverified authority is doubly fallacious. You must prove that my contention is wrong, by demonstrating how metaphysical claims can be empirically tested, or how empirical results can have metaphysical consequences. I most sincerely doubt that you can do either.

530 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:55:07pm

re: #523 LoveOneAnother

The Norman and Setterfield paper gives me pause about it. Their asymptotic curve for various estimates of the speed of light over the last 300 years correlates with Bibilical dates for various global events, including the continental division interpreted from the Bible. Gentry also published a paper in Science concerning pleochroic halos that he interpreted as causing questions about the rates of decay in the past being higher. More interesting to me are the double halos Gentry studied in the Colorado Plateau which was published as being strata millions of years old in being laid down, but his study of the halos indicated a period of just 20 years. I still have a lot of questions, but that is what science is all about, considering the questions, forming hypotheses, and then testing them. It makes me sick how all these questions are "off limits" because of the religious implications of the necessity of a Creator should the results of these empirical tests go the "wrong way" in regards to anti-Creationist views.

Umm...when the dino-killing meteorite hit close to the Gulf of Mexico around 65 million years ago, rhodium precipitated over the entire area (including Colorado), and thus left debris traces of the impact.

531 Salamantis  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 6:07:24pm

re: #521 LoveOneAnother

There are assumptions made in radiometric dating, such as a constant decay rate, and no daughter material originally. I have enough reserve about the validity of these assumptions that I have not yet considered the young earth theories falsified simply because of radiometric dating.

Umm...there are dozens of different radiometric dating methods, and not only do they corroborate each other, but they are also corroborated by external references such as tree corings, geological strata, and ice cap cores.

No, I am saying that it is wrong to marginalize those who would like to consider the question in a scientific analysis. I have been on fossil digs myself where I have seen the data misrepresented because of the strong evolutionary and uniformitarian bias. Therefore, I read studies with a skeptical eye and want to look at the actual data myself rather than just the interpretation being made. Some studies have claimed sedimentation of millions of years, only to later exhibit polystrate fossils that belie that interpretation, and later radiometric dating contradicted the originally published ones.

Actual polystrate fossils don't exist; they are a creationist talking point. What they mostly hold up are fossil trees near volcanos where subsequent eruptions have flowed over them, or that whale fossil that got stood vertically by tectonic plate displacement (and it was found in a single, vertically tilted stratum).

I think that YEC theories are some of the most risky ID theories out there, and they are certainly able to be tested by scientists, including those who do not believe in a Creator or want their research to have anything to do with a Creator.

I can respect a scientist who says that a YEC theory has been falsified because of X, Y, Z, but I lose respect for the scientist who claims it is religion rather than science and therefore not worthy to be examined by scientists or talked about in science class.

My perspective is that YEC theories are scientific in the sense that they make empirical predictions that can be tested. If a YEC theory is falsified, then it is a falsified scientific theory, not a theory that has no place in science.

If it weren't for the Book of Genesis, you wouldn't have anyone wasting energy on YEC, just like if it weren't for the Flood myth, you wouldn't have people stalking around Middle Eastern mountaintops searching for Ark fragments. You can call what they're doing science all you want, but they are actually attempting to empirically verify religious contentions. They are doing precisely the opposite of what science is. Rather than collecting the data and allowing the explanation to emerge from it, they are beginning with their conclusions, then going on selective easter-egg hunts for justification.

532 Charles Johnson  Fri, Feb 13, 2009 8:52:29am

Oh for Pete's sake. Not this distorted crap about carbon dating again.

You creationists really need some new material. This is worse than Henny Youngman.

533 Mr Secul  Fri, Feb 13, 2009 11:26:38am

re: #523 LoveOneAnother

The Norman and Setterfield paper gives me pause about it. Their asymptotic curve for various estimates of the speed of light over the last 300 years correlates with Bibilical dates for various global events, including the continental division interpreted from the Bible.

I Googled for Norman and Setterfield and found this at irc.org as the first hit.

They are not convinced by Norman and Setterfield and non-Creationist sites are even more skeptical. Norman and Setterfield cherry picked their data.

How could you not have known this?

I think that you were asking me to consider that radioactive decay rates could have been much higher in the past.

So I did.

old earth is ~4,500,000,000 years old. young earth is 10,000 years old. So the increase in decay is 450,000 times.

I looked up radiation does and found this. It gives figures in millrems.

Approximate lethal dose ("LD50") if no treatment and given to the entire body in a short period 450,000

Natural background, Boston, MA, USA (per year)(excluding radon) 102

So I multiply 102 by 450,000 and get 45,900,000 millirems for someone living in Boston.

Hmmm...

OK, this dose would be delivered over an entire year but I still think it would kill you.

The page I found said

Maximum permissible annual dose (excluding natural background and medical exposure) to general public 170

That wont kill you and I'm sure that you could take a lot more but not 270,000 times more. (45,900,000 / 170) Not over your entire life and not for generation after generation, all the begats.

OK, I've considered that decay rates may have been vastly greater in the past and I think that the idea is silly.

Why do you give it any credence?


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

The brand new and bruising power.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

MikeySDCA
China Is Culturally Superior to America - the Atlantic Wire
2 hours, 9 minutes ago
Views: 60 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

researchok
'I Was Looking Forward to a Quiet Old Age': Instead, Etta Shiber, Helped Smuggle Stranded Allied Soldiers To Freedom
7 hours, 40 minutes ago
Views: 101 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 0

Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
15 hours, 21 minutes ago
Views: 118 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
16 hours, 14 minutes ago
Views: 132 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Michael McBacon
Kansas governor signs 'Shariah bill' to ban Islamic law
20 hours, 44 minutes ago
Views: 248 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 6

Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
1 day, 20 hours ago
Views: 476 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 0 • Rating: -5

MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
1 day, 21 hours ago
Views: 237 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Ascher
Israeli Who Saved Turk on Everest: You Never Abandon a Friend - Israel News, Ynetnews
1 day, 23 hours ago
Views: 307 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Haywood Jabloeme
The Harrassment of Patterico & Its Roots in Left-Wing Activism
1 day, 23 hours ago
Views: 529 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Curt
Brian Banks: (Video) Falsely accused of rape speaks out
2 days, 1 hour ago
Views: 284 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

 Frank says:

You get nothing with your college degree -- from Roxy & Elsewhere