Jump to bottom

99 comments
1 winston06  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:33:59pm

These are sad days for America, IMO

2 sngnsgt  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:34:55pm

re: #1 winston06

Inexperience setting in.

3 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:35:33pm

Watch your back, especially if you are of a certain age. I trust the gov with my health as much as I trust them with, um, uh, er, oh yeah….ANYTHING!

4 Killian Bundy  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:36:41pm

Your electronic health records will be shared with and compiled by the Federal government.

/what could possibly go wrong with that?

5 Right mind left  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:37:34pm

Will we need to have independent news networks dig into the REAL news from here on out? Until the Fairness Doctrine, I guess…

6 Golem Akbar  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:37:46pm

Has anyone heard from the AMA? Are they in favor of this bill?

7 ArmyWife  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:38:37pm

re: #6 Golem Akbar

I read an article at work about physicians being very, very concerned with this. Let me see if I can find a link to it…

8 Soona'  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:39:28pm

re: #6 Golem Akbar

Has anyone heard from the AMA? Are they in favor of this bill?

The members that’ll profit the most from this probably will be.

9 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:39:31pm

re: #7 ArmyWife

I would certainly hope they are concerned. Nurses and other support staff should be bellowing about it.

10 IslandLibertarian  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:39:39pm
11 Last Mohican  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:41:30pm

re: #6 Golem Akbar

Has anyone heard from the AMA? Are they in favor of this bill?

AMA applauds senate for investing in health care through stimulus

12 Golem Akbar  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:42:28pm

re: #8 Soona’

The members that’ll profit the most from this probably will be.


I read somewhere that doctors are afraid the new health legislation will kill med school applications, that doctors will no longer be able to make a good living in medicine. Until now, foreign doctors have flocked to the US because they had a chance to earn some serious bucks. The fear is that those times may be over. I’d be curious to read what the AMA thinks.

13 LGoPs  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:42:51pm

The same bunch of geniuses that run the DMV are now going to be making your health care decisions……..
Heaven help us.

14 Soona'  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:44:09pm

re: #13 LGoPs

The same bunch of geniuses that run the DMV are now going to be making your health care decisions……..
Heaven help us.

They already are in many cases.

15 sngnsgt  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:44:18pm

re: #4 Killian Bundy

I thought they stopped using punch cards years ago..?

16 KingKenrod  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:44:38pm

Of course the AMA supports it, it has billions in research and health care grants.

17 formercorpsman  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:44:49pm

Pelosi, Kucinich, Paul, etc.

Hopefully none of the will have a say in pushing the potassium.

18 sngnsgt  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:47:02pm

Take a number and have a seat.

19 Soona'  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:47:06pm

re: #17 formercorpsman

Pelosi, Kucinich, Paul, etc.

Hopefully none of the will have a say in pushing the potassium.

Don’t be surprised at anything. My feelings are that if this happens, Pelosi will be slathering to write the first national euthanasia laws.

20 Silhouette  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:47:49pm

re: #5 Right mind left

Will we need to have independent news networks dig into the REAL news from here on out? Until the Fairness Doctrine, I guess…

Pajamas TV has a subscription program which you can join in you’d like to make sure they are successful and stay around.

The cheapest is $15/month but a little birdie told me they are thinking about offering $5/month plan.

21 ArmyWife  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:49:06pm

From the AMA site

Incentive payment structures for health information technology (HIT) adoption differ. In particular, the imposition of Medicare payment reductions for those providers who are not “meaningful users” of HIT would begin in 2015 in the Senate bill, one year earlier than in the House bill.

There were widespread reports and commentaries this week that mischaracterize some provisions of the package pertaining to HIT and to comparative effectiveness research. To clarify, neither version of the bill would create a federal system for electronically tracking patients’ medical treatments or for monitoring compliance with federal treatment standards. While the legislation would impose financial penalties for those who do not adopt HIT in the next 6-7 years, those penalties bear no relation to individual treatment decisions made by physicians. Further, neither bill would create a single new bureaucracy to determine whether treatments are appropriate or cost effective. In fact, both versions of the bill incorporate by reference provisions in current law that prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from including mandates establishing national clinical guidelines or national coverage decisions in clinical comparative effectiveness research.


[Link: www.ama-assn.org…]

22 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:49:11pm

re: #18 sngnsgt

Next year.

23 Silhouette  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:50:04pm

The lefties think we’ll all get the Mayo Clinic.

But they need to recall what the free clinic is like.

24 Silhouette  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:50:57pm

You can have world class health care that some cannot afford, or you can have crappy health care for everyone.

25 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:51:59pm

re: #23 Silhouette

Oh, the chosen lefties will get top notch care. The little folks who pay taxes, not so hot.

26 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:53:47pm

re: #23 Silhouette

The lefties think we’ll all get the Mayo Clinic.

But they need to recall what the free clinic is like.

Mao clinic me thinks.

27 Empire1  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:54:14pm

I’m rather glad my parents were able to die in comfort, unworried about health care, when the military retiree health care promises were still being honored. That no longer applies, and this just makes things worse for retirees and their dependents.

Tricare sucks.

28 [deleted]  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:54:20pm
29 fish  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:55:29pm

My youngest was born 4 months premature. She was given a very poor prognosis and was not expected to survive the first night. A team of 13 doctors and nurses worked on her for 17 hours to get her stabilized enough to be transferred to the NICU at the Children’s hospital a few blocks away. She spent the next 4 months there, during which time she was never considered likely to ever leave.

It is my understanding that under the new rule, the doctors would have had to justify the effort to the Efficiency Department as being likely to succeed and that she would be likely to live a productive life.

Since at no point were the doctors convinced of this likelihood I doubt they would have been able to convince a bureaucrat of it. Treatment would most likely have been denied.

She will be 6 next month and has no significant health or neurological problems. She is a normal little girl. The thought that some other child like my daughter may be denied a chance because of this sickens me. I realize that little can be done at this point to stop this, but maybe we can spread the word and start working to overturn it.

30 fish  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:58:07pm

re: #21 ArmyWife

From the AMA site


[Link: www.ama-assn.org…]

If this is true and I have been upset by mis-characterization I will be very pleased.

31 jwb7605  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 2:58:29pm

Semi OT, part of an e-mail I just got:

Dan Seals is in the midst of a medical crises in his treatment for cancer at the Bethesda hospital, and is in intense pain at this moment. He is faced with a major surgery to cope with this emergency, and the prospects are unknown at this time.

32 Boolz  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:00:31pm

you would think the proponents of socialized health care would be singing the praises of all the socialized health care we already have…medicare for the old, medicaid for the poor, VA for veterans. They should be pointing out about how everybody on these systems always get the care they need when they need it, about how cheap these programs are, and about how wonderful it would be if just the rest of us were on them too. But for some strange reason, they never do.

33 ArmyWife  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:07:30pm

re: #27 Empire1

there wasn’t a promise for that, though I know that myth runs rampant. Tricare does suck - but not for those reasons.

[Link: www.law.umaryland.edu…]

34 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:07:47pm

re: #12 Golem Akbar


rubbish. in every country with universal health care doctors are given huge pay.

35 ArmyWife  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:08:21pm

re: #30 fish

It seems weird to me if the AMA interpretation is correct and the rest of the nation is wrong. I guess I should go read it for myself!

36 kcladderman  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:10:13pm

re: #31 jwb7605

Semi OT, part of an e-mail I just got:

Dan Seals is in the midst of a medical crises in his treatment for cancer at the Bethesda hospital, and is in intense pain at this moment. He is faced with a major surgery to cope with this emergency, and the prospects are unknown at this time.

The pain from cancer can be horrible. I watched my mother suffer for hours because of a mistake on her charts that stop her morphine. She had been on very large doses for days and some how her medication got switched to Tylenol 3. It was hours before they got the pain under control and she dies just a few hours later. Her last day on earth was filled with horrible pain all because of a paperwork error.
I pray they can help Dan with his pain. I have been a fan for years both England Dan and the country star.

37 Empire1  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:14:57pm

re: #33 ArmyWife

there wasn’t a promise for that, though I know that myth runs rampant. Tricare does suck - but not for those reasons.

[Link: www.law.umaryland.edu…]

Not a legal promise, perhaps, but one my parents were able to make use of until their deaths, and Mr. Empire and I were able to use until ten years after he retired. So don’t tell me it was a myth!

38 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:16:00pm

re: #34 schnapp

rubbish. in every country with universal health care doctors are given huge pay.

so that’s why so many of them come here huh?

39 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:20:54pm

re: #38 brookly red

here are the base salary rates for doctors in australia

tell me that they are low paid here? i don’t know of any doctors that have moved to the US just because they are chasing money. doctors become doctors because they want to help people.

40 Cymbaline  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:20:57pm

From Thomas Sowell’s column this week:

Do you want to have to jump through bureaucratic hoops when you are sick? If not, why would you be in favor of government-run medical care?

41 Cymbaline  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:24:39pm

re: #36 kcladderman

The pain from cancer can be horrible. I watched my mother suffer for hours because of a mistake on her charts that stop her morphine. She had been on very large doses for days and some how her medication got switched to Tylenol 3. It was hours before they got the pain under control and she dies just a few hours later. Her last day on earth was filled with horrible pain all because of a paperwork error.
I pray they can help Dan with his pain. I have been a fan for years both England Dan and the country star.

That’s awful! My sincere condolences to your family.

42 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:25:59pm

re: #39 schnapp

here are the base salary rates for doctors in australia

tell me that they are low paid here? i don’t know of any doctors that have moved to the US just because they are chasing money. doctors become doctors because they want to help people.

that’s true… hard to help people when the care is rationed. i guess it’s not the money after all.

43 ArmyWife  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:28:41pm

re: #37 Empire1

I come from a long line of Military (Army specifically, both my Grandfathers, my father and now, of course, I am married to it). My dad retired - he never thought he had “free for life”, he does pay for the retiree Tricare plan. My husband never thought that would be a benefit (but he is a medic, so perhaps he was closer to the health care system and that’s why). I would guess because the thought was so rampant (and I know it was) that people really and truly believed it to be true.

44 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:32:32pm

re: #40 Cymbaline

i don’t know where you get this false information from about public health care. i haven’t ever experienced “bureaucratic hoops” and the government has never taken away choice from me. i have the choice of my own phycisian and although if i use the public system i don’t get my own doctor (i still have the option of private health care) i actually do get treated. and when the ambulance takes some one away here who has been in a car crash, the person hanging on to life doesn’t have to give insurance details or sign any piece of paper. you get treated. simple.

so in fact i have more choice than in the US. i can go to a private hospital and get treated when i want by who i want. but if i lost my job i cuold still actually get treated, even if i have “less choice”. that is unlike tens of millions of americans.

45 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:34:12pm

re: #42 brookly red

ha. at least i have never been in a position to sell my own home because i can’t afford health care costs. real efficient system (that costs the US double what it costs australia)

46 snowcrash  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:38:16pm

re: #44 schnapp
Do you have any data on avg. wait time for CABG or hip replacements in patients over 70 years old?

47 Dan G.  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:40:40pm

re: #27 Empire1

Universal Health Care… Tricare for everyone! That should be enough to scare the shit out of anyone.

48 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:42:11pm

nope. but i know its quicker in the private system here. you can get treated immediately. but. at least you are not denied care because you don’t have the right insurance or none at all. i am sure that the 40 something million people in the US without insurance would love a private system. they would have to wait, but they would get care.

49 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:42:24pm

re: #45 schnapp

ha. at least i have never been in a position to sell my own home because i can’t afford health care costs. real efficient system (that costs the US double what it costs australia)

OK, glad you like yours… now just stay away from mine. Fair enough?

50 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:43:27pm

re: #48 schnapp

You are misinformed. No one in the USA can be denied treatment at a public hospital.

51 Gray Skies  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:44:38pm

My two bits’ worth… one of the common complaints I hear from those favoring a national health care system is that the insurance companies should not be making health care decisions - those decisions should be between the doctor and patient. So how is a government board making those decisions any different?

Secondly, my son-in-law is a physician in a field of medicine that is experiencing a huge shortage of expertise right now. He absolutely refuses to continue in practice if national health care is implemented. The quality of care will deteriorate, in his opinion, and he does NOT want to deal with government bureaucracy. Dealing with Medicare right now is a nightmare as it is. He says that many doctors will voluntarily cease to be doctors anymore, and the government will have to hire from overseas.

Finally, the government is getting intrusive enough without having ready access to people’s personal medical information. This all has a very bad feel to it, and there is more behind it than meets the eye, in my humble opinion.

52 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:46:23pm

re: #49 brookly red

nope. i will to continue to critisize your inefficient, costly and unfair system because i believe that everybody deserves health care regardless if they can pay for it.

53 ArmyWife  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:50:18pm

re: #48 schnapp

Firstly, we have health care subsidized by state governments for those who are poor and uncovered, as well as some federal programs. Sadly, Ms. Pelosi and her Merry Band of Thieves have expanded S-chip to cover people earning up to $65,000/yr - which, surprisingly, is only $5,000 less then the Dems new definition of “rich” which is $70,000. Secondly, for those that are able, McDonald’s offers health care benefits for it’s employees.

I’m not up on Australian health care, luckily I have a really good friend who immigrated from Australia to here. I’ll ask him if he feels the same as you, just as a counter check. I do know we get a lot of people in from Canada and the UK for our care here. I don’t think that’s a coincidence. I don’t believe our current system is perfect - I do believe it is the best system currently in existence.

54 Dan G.  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:50:58pm

re: #52 schnapp

Why stop at health care?

55 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:51:07pm

re: #51 Gray Skies

So true. Yes, the system does need an overhaul, but not by this commie & Co. in the WH.The thought of these slimeballs controlling our access to healthcare should concern all Americans.

56 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:53:01pm

re: #52 schnapp

nope. i will to continue to critisize your inefficient, costly and unfair system because i believe that everybody deserves health care regardless if they can pay for it.

critisize all you want, but just remember that it IS our system, not yours.
got it? not yours, not yours, not yours… so get over it.

57 ArmyWife  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:53:21pm

re: #50 vagabond trader

Details. ;)

58 acwgusa  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:53:46pm

re: #52 schnapp

Despite what the Democrats/Socialists/United Nations HRC say, Health Care in the United States is NOT a right. No one is entitled to anything in this county (US), besides life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. No one deserves anything in the US. You want something here? You work for it! Being handed something because you can claim your victim card is bigger then the next guy is completely against what the US stood for before President Barack Ohandout.

59 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 3:59:04pm

re: #54 Dan G.

because health care is a matter of life and death. you don’t get treated - you die. the only other universal service should be education because access to basic health care and education give people equal opportunity.

60 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:01:29pm

re: #59 schnapp

Yeah, we know, it’s for the children.

61 debutaunt  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:03:09pm

re: #59 schnapp

because health care is a matter of life and death. you don’t get treated - you die. the only other universal service should be education because access to basic health care and education give people equal opportunity.

You seem to be very concerned about this topic. Are you in the health care industry?

62 acwgusa  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:07:09pm

re: #59 schnapp

because health care is a matter of life and death. you don’t get treated - you die. the only other universal service should be education because access to basic health care and education give people equal opportunity.


Here’s a nasty little hint for your pie in the blue sky world. People DIE. Even if they get treated.

Oh, and Equal Opportunity isn’t a right either.

63 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:12:24pm

re: #61 debutaunt

i am a very open and big supporter of america and wish it the best. there are however a few things in america that i don’t like. for example i don’t like guns. i also don’t like the health care system. no where in the world has a good health care system though. i believe that health care should be private and public. australia’s is good, but should be more privatized.

64 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:14:02pm

re: #62 acwgusa


Oh, and Equal Opportunity isn’t a right either.

actually I think it is… but equal results are not guaranteed

65 debutaunt  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:14:28pm

re: #63 schnapp

i am a very open and big supporter of america and wish it the best. there are however a few things in america that i don’t like. for example i don’t like guns. i also don’t like the health care system. no where in the world has a good health care system though. i believe that health care should be private and public. australia’s is good, but should be more privatized.

Where do you live?

66 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:15:50pm

re: #65 debutaunt
australia.

67 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:17:58pm

re: #63 schnapp

i am a very open and big supporter of america and wish it the best. there are however a few things in america that i don’t like. for example i don’t like guns. i also don’t like the health care system. no where in the world has a good health care system though. i believe that health care should be private and public. australia’s is good, but should be more privatized.

back pedaling… it’s a right or it’s not

68 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:18:37pm

re: #63 schnapp

Oooo, you would really hate where I live. My entire neighborhood owns guns legally, we have virtually no crime, and it’s not a coincidence.

69 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:22:00pm

re: #67 brookly red


it is a right.
there are many things i like about the US system. what i don’t like is that it is inefficient and costly and the government should have better infrastructure and services for a public system alongside a private system.

70 Gray Skies  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:24:28pm

re: #55 vagabond trader

Another thing…I managed benefit appeals for a local HMO until 6 months ago. I did this for 20 years. I am well familiar with the health care benefit package for Federal employees. It is soooo rich in benefits compared to those offered by the individual and other small employer group plans we marketed. Almost everything was/is covered for the Feds. Second in line was the benefit package for State employees. Yet it was enrollees on these two plans that complained the most when small copays were added to the plans a few years ago. I believe that the Fed standard option plan now also has a coinsurance provision, and there was a huge outcry from enrollees against even this. They do not want to pay for anything, even though their fellow citizens in the private sector, if they even have insurance, are paying huge premiums and significant cost shares.

If there is a mandated national health care system, it needs to apply equally across the board to ALL Americans. And those formerly enrolled under the above-mentioned plans will fall over in shock at their new benefit package and the government-established clinical protocol in place to determine who gets what. There is absolutely NO WAY that a national system can provide (for everyone) the level of benefits that is currently allowed for government workers.

71 debutaunt  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:27:02pm

re: #66 schnapp

australia.

I don’t understand the point of griping about guns and healthcare in the US? How does it affect you?

72 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:28:49pm

re: #69 schnapp

it is a right.
there are many things i like about the US system. what i don’t like is that it is inefficient and costly and the government should have better infrastructure and services for a public system alongside a private system.

i am taxed heavily enough for the health care of others thank you…
now if you don’t mind, i don’t put my nose in your affairs, maybe you should attend to matters at home.

73 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:29:16pm

re: #71 debutaunt

it doesn’t. but i care about these issues.

74 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:30:25pm

re: #73 schnapp

it doesn’t. but i care about these issues.

think globally, act LOCALLY

75 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:31:21pm

re: #70 Gray Skies

We live in Ct where the state is the biggest employer, and they are exactly as you describe, sacred cows. My late mother in law worked for them and she was dumbfounded to learn that her son did not have unlimited 100% paid for health care forever. It’s the entitlement mentality on steroids.

76 snowcrash  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:31:46pm

Hey schnapp, I’d make food a right before I made medicine one. What do you think is a more basic need. lol

77 Gray Skies  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:33:59pm

re: #66 schnapp

One of the managers at the HMO I worked at was a woman from Australia. We were having a discussion around the cost of benefits and coverage, and she told me that the elderly in Australia in fact are denied certain treatments. She said that there are places run by the government (at no charge to the resident) where these people can go until they pass, and they are treated “royally” until that time comes.

To your knowledge, is this true?

78 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:34:10pm

re: #76 snowcrash

In Australia, I’d be wailing on the government to allow people to clear the fcking brush off and adjacent to their property.

79 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:34:42pm

re: #76 snowcrash

Hey schnapp, I’d make food a right before I made medicine one. What do you think is a more basic need. lol

we have programs for that too…

80 Gray Skies  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:37:16pm

re: #75 vagabond trader

We at one time had to cover Viagra for the Feds (for its most commonly known diagnosis). You should have heard the Fed enrollees scream when that was taken away.

81 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:40:26pm

re: #77 Gray Skies

i’ve never heard about it.

82 vagabond trader  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:42:57pm

re: #80 Gray Skies

lol, poor dears, bet their wives are glad.

83 Gray Skies  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:43:53pm

re: #81 schnapp

Thanks - I was just wondering if someone else from Australia might know this.

84 Gray Skies  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:44:53pm

re: #82 vagabond trader

Yep, it was always the man that complained.

85 acwgusa  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:47:53pm

re: #64 brookly red

Oh, and Equal Opportunity isn’t a right either.

actually I think it is… but equal results are not guaranteed

You’re correct, I was thinking of equal outcome.

86 brookly red  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 4:50:39pm

re: #85 acwgusa

You’re correct, I was thinking of equal outcome.

easy mistake to make these days…

87 jorline  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 5:38:38pm

Obama said they were going to go through the budget line by line.

Appears Obama got tired of reading the budget and said fuck-it, there are to many lines.

88 the1sgjohns  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 6:16:54pm

Gregg withdraws as commerce secretary nominee

Whoa! another one bites the dust. But is it not 4 who have bit the dust, not 3 as stated in this article? Let’s count kids; One for Richardson, One for Daschle, One for the new cabinet position as accountability czar, I for get the woman’s name, and One for Gregg. That’s 4. Hmmm what other fuzzy math is out there now.

89 [deleted]  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 7:01:41pm
90 Code Red 21  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 7:12:11pm

re: #59 schnapp

because health care is a matter of life and death. you don’t get treated - you die. the only other universal service should be education because access to basic health care and education give people equal opportunity.

I work in health care and have done so for 23 years. In all of the years that I have worked in the health care field I have yet to see one patient turned away or denied treatment. Where are you getting your info?
The uninsured in this country are people that I personally know who don’t want to fork over the money, and they can afford it, because they would rather spend their money on something more important to them like alcohol, drugs and cigarettes. There is no way in hell I want a government employee deciding what is best for me. We hear constantly about staying out of a woman’s uterus when it comes to abortion well I want them to stay totally out of any decisions about my body. They can f off and as far as I’m concerned, so can you.

91 dapperdave  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 7:37:27pm

Sounds like trickle down government to me, I’m running as far away from this crap has I possibly can.

92 kynna  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 7:51:25pm

re: #88 the1sgjohns

Gregg withdraws as commerce secretary nominee

Whoa! another one bites the dust. But is it not 4 who have bit the dust, not 3 as stated in this article? Let’s count kids; One for Richardson, One for Daschle, One for the new cabinet position as accountability czar, I for get the woman’s name, and One for Gregg. That’s 4. Hmmm what other fuzzy math is out there now.

Gregg has paid his taxes. His job was being gutted (unconstitutionally, IMO) so he did the first smart thing he’s done in this whole fiasco. Did he actually resign his seat? Arrogant politicians. I have no patience for them.

93 GGMac  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 7:52:55pm

re: #31 jwb7605

Semi OT, part of an e-mail I just got:

Dan Seals is in the midst of a medical crises in his treatment for cancer at the Bethesda hospital, and is in intense pain at this moment. He is faced with a major surgery to cope with this emergency, and the prospects are unknown at this time.

Is this about Dan Seals the singer - or Dan Seals the Chicago politician?

94 kynna  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 7:55:47pm

re: #59 schnapp

because health care is a matter of life and death. you don’t get treated - you die. the only other universal service should be education because access to basic health care and education give people equal opportunity.

There was a Canadian Lizard on here recently detailing how his mother’s diagnostic procedures and treatment were put off so long that they (government-run health care ‘they’) have decided there’s nothing they can do and she will just have to die with dignity.

Had she lived in the US, even without health insurance, she’d have been treated. Would she die from her cancer? Probably. Everybody dies, after all. But she would not have been dismissed.

You are tragically ill-informed for someone who claims to ‘care about these issues.’

95 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 7:55:54pm

re: #90 Code Red 21

no need to snap at me. is open debate something you can’t handle? maybe you don’t want open debate because you don’t actually know anything about universal health care. i live in a country where anyone can get health care through the public or private system and people with mental illnesses such as drug and alcohol addiction are given the chance to get their lives on track.
i don’t know where you get it from that a government employee decides anything for you. it works the same way in a public system. you and the doctors decide what is the best treatment and the govt pays most or all of the bill. and yes the public system is slow and overcrowded, but it doesn’t cost 16% of GDP like it does in america. those who don’t want the hassle of public health care use the private system, where the quality of care is on par with the US. those who can’t afford treatment at the private system settle with the public.

96 schnapp  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 8:01:00pm

re: #94 kynna

i have said countless times that public systems are inefficient. in australia you can get private care (which from memory accounts for about 40% of health care expenditure). but if you have private alongside public, with a little more private than we have here, the public system is under less stress.
a for-profit hospital is more likely however to turn you back if it is not profitable to operate. then what? basically without a another place that will actually do the treatment, you’re fucked.

97 Sloppy  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 8:09:15pm

It’s sort of standard to cite the DMV as an example of governmental inefficiency. As a matter of fairness I’d like to note that the DMV branch in my neighborhood is fast, efficient, accurate and friendly. I wouldn’t hesitate to put those good folks in charge of health care.

98 kynna  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 8:12:49pm

re: #97 Sloppy

It’s sort of standard to cite the DMV as an example of governmental inefficiency. As a matter of fairness I’d like to note that the DMV branch in my neighborhood is fast, efficient, accurate and friendly. I wouldn’t hesitate to put those good folks in charge of health care.

And they’d do a great job, right. The DMV in NJ where I used to live was slow, rude, negligent, incompetent, and corrupt (the very office where I got my DL was found to be providing fake DLs left and right). They are more the norm for a DMV.

You’re lucky. But I don’t want to trust my nation’s health care to luck.

99 kynna  Thu, Feb 12, 2009 8:16:36pm

re: #96 schnapp

i have said countless times that public systems are inefficient. in australia you can get private care (which from memory accounts for about 40% of health care expenditure). but if you have private alongside public, with a little more private than we have here, the public system is under less stress.
a for-profit hospital is more likely however to turn you back if it is not profitable to operate. then what? basically without a another place that will actually do the treatment, you’re fucked.

You still don’t get it. A private hospital won’t turn people away if there’s not a public hospital to send them to. They will be sued up the gazoo.

“For profit” = “responsibility”

“Government run” = “no recourse”

(BTW — sue a gov’t run institution and you pay the reward yourself along with all the other tax payers — nothing is free)


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
Yesterday
Views: 82 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 255 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1