Thursday Afternoon Open

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Open • Thu Apr 23, 2009 at 12:18 pm PDT • Views: 176

A certain amount of opposition is a great help to a man. Kites rise against and not with the wind. Even a head wind is better than none. No man ever worked his passage anywhere in a dead calm. Let no man wax pale, therefore, because of opposition.

John Neal

Advertisement

537 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:18:44pm

Ahh! New thread smell!

2 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:20:23pm
3 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:21:04pm

Someone just misdialed and got my personal cell number.

Appearantly my number is very close to that of someone in the Center for Disease Control. I could have a lot of fun with that.

"Sorry ma'am, you mean you didn't get the e-mail? Look; just duct tape all of your doors and windows shut and wait patiently for the black van to show up out front. Whatever you do don't panic..."

4 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:21:51pm

Yhis Saturday, 2pm, San Diego Lizard Meetup in Mission Valley, email me for details, I'll send out something tonight with my cell number (I never remember it and left it at home)

5 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:21:59pm

Interesting historical fact about patterns of tobacco use among appalachians et al. Ever wonder why chewing tobacco and oral snuff are the modes of preference there?

Same reason they were in Cornwall and anywhere else where folks mined. People needed their nic fixes but didn't dare make a fire/

6 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:22:51pm

Doppleganglander- any word on your son?

7 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:23:01pm

re: #3 DaddyG

Someone just misdialed and got my personal cell number.

Appearantly my number is very close to that of someone in the Center for Disease Control. I could have a lot of fun with that.

"Sorry ma'am, you mean you didn't get the e-mail? Look; just duct tape all of your doors and windows shut and wait patiently for the black van to show up out front. Whatever you do don't panic..."

My office number at Camp Lejeune was almost the same as the base golf course. We gave up and just scheduled tee times for people

8 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:23:06pm

So, I bought a new router last night. It's a Netgear WNR2000. I don't know why we bought a new router. It's black and shiny with lots of blinking lights. I got it installed with little problem. I haven't noticed a difference except for the power adapter being less noisy.

9 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:24:18pm

re: #5 Guanxi88

Interesting historical fact about patterns of tobacco use among appalachians et al. Ever wonder why chewing tobacco and oral snuff are the modes of preference there?

Same reason they were in Cornwall and anywhere else where folks mined. People needed their nic fixes but didn't dare make a fire/

They were content to destroy their lungs only with coal dust, and didn't need an assist from the tobacco smoke.

10 Maui Girl  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:24:21pm

And the latest polls show that America is suffering from "voters' remorse". Obama still has high approval rating and the majority of the poll takers believe our country, while tanking, is headed in the right direction... AP writes a wonderfully, love-filled article on our current President. Obama however, has given himself 3 years to make the hopey changey happen. It's gonna be a long three years.

11 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:24:28pm

re: #8 ConservatismNow!

So, I bought a new router last night. It's a Netgear WNR2000. I don't know why we bought a new router. It's black and shiny with lots of blinking lights. I got it installed with little problem. I haven't noticed a difference except for the power adapter being less noisy.

Did you change the default username and password for administration?

12 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:24:30pm

omg, Ben you gotta check out the pic a few scrolls down here:

[Link: iowahawk.typepad.com...]

13 alegrias  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:24:45pm

Poor Myrtle Beach, burning. Anyone here have an eyewitness account?

14 Killgore Trout  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:25:30pm

re: #8 ConservatismNow!

I hate routers. They are finger eaters, second only to planers. I'm happy to stick to hand tools but I work on pretty small stuff most of the time.

15 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:25:45pm

re: #12 turn

ha "Editor's correction -- after studying that picture for a few hours, I believe that's the CN Tower."

16 Maui Girl  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:25:49pm

I should have said "voter's denial"

17 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:26:05pm

re: #11 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Did you change the default username and password for administration?

I'm not telling you anything.

18 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:26:33pm

Since it is speak like Shakespeare day, here's a good quote:

Indeed, it is a strange disposed time:
But men may construe things after their fashion,
Clean from the purpose of the things themselves.
-Cicero (Julius Caesar)

19 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:26:34pm

re: #6 DaddyG

Doppleganglander- any word on your son?

Not yet. Thanks for asking. I'm lurking here to keep my sanity and I'll post as soon as I hear anything.

20 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:26:39pm

re: #8 ConservatismNow!

So, I bought a new router last night. It's a Netgear WNR2000. I don't know why we bought a new router. It's black and shiny with lots of blinking lights. I got it installed with little problem. I haven't noticed a difference except for the power adapter being less noisy.

I got one of them Airport Extremes.

Plugged it in, and was surfing the Web at high speed within 45 seconds.

Haven't had to turn it off or reset it since then, and that was two years ago.

Probably the simplest and most reliable computer peripheral I've ever bought.

21 Fluffy Bunny  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:26:57pm

re: #6 DaddyG

Doppleganglander...I just learned of your son's emergency, I pray that all is well.

22 Mithrax  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:27:38pm

re: #18 Honorary Yooper

Since it is speak like Shakespeare day, here's a good quote:

Indeed, it is a strange disposed time:
But men may construe things after their fashion,
Clean from the purpose of the things themselves.
-Cicero (Julius Caesar)

Friends, Romans, countrymen, let me your ears...

What do you have there?

A bag of ears!

- Wayne and Shuster

23 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:27:48pm

re: #21 Fluffy Bunny

Doppleganglander...I just learned of your son's emergency, I pray that all is well.

Thanks, FB. I also read about your numerous medical tests on the overnight thread and you're in my prayers as well.

Daddy G, how did you even know I was here?!

24 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:28:04pm

re: #8 ConservatismNow!

So, I bought a new router last night. It's a Netgear WNR2000. I don't know why we bought a new router. It's black and shiny with lots of blinking lights. I got it installed with little problem. I haven't noticed a difference except for the power adapter being less noisy.

Also: the Airport Extreme is completely silent.

25 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:28:06pm

re: #9 zombie

They were content to destroy their lungs only with coal dust, and didn't need an assist from the tobacco smoke.

EH, those miners were always heavy 'baccy users, but they adapted their consumption methods based on where they were. Oral use of tobacco was fine in a mine, as there was little need for the danger of making yet another fire or spark down there (incidentally, the same reason why the British navy, and indeed sailors of all nations, adopted the use of chewing tobacco and snuff instead of pipes when aboard ship).

26 SalsaNChips  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:28:12pm

Just saw that they've determined what killed those 21 polo ponies. Mix-up in their vitamins (probably selenium). So incredibly tragic.

27 wrenchwench  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:28:17pm
Even a head wind is better than none.

No! Ban fascist headwinds!

28 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:29:43pm

re: #26 SalsaNChips

Just saw that they've determined what killed those 21 polo ponies. Mix-up in their vitamins (probably selenium). So incredibly tragic.

It never ceases to amaze me how delicate those huge powerful animals really are.

29 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:30:17pm

re: #26 SalsaNChips

Just saw that they've determined what killed those 21 polo ponies. Mix-up in their vitamins (probably selenium). So incredibly tragic.

I saw that. Some intern at a pharmacy mis-read the prescription and ended up killing 21 gorgeous horses simply by putting the wrong ratio of ingredients in their shots. I'd feel guilty for the rest of my life.

30 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:30:33pm

re: #24 zombie

Also: the Airport Extreme is completely silent.

That's always nice. When I used my old router I thought the noise was coming from my UPS, but it turned out to be the AC adapter for the router. After I swapped out routers, there was no problem.

31 Zimriel  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:30:38pm

re: #10 Maui Girl

And the latest polls show that America is suffering from "voters' remorse". Obama still has high approval rating and the majority of the poll takers believe our country, while tanking, is headed in the right direction... AP writes a wonderfully, love-filled article on our current President. Obama however, has given himself 3 years to make the hopey changey happen. It's gonna be a long three years.

There's a lot of O-love linked on Drudge Report today. Some of it written by O's own aides.

32 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:30:56pm

re: #23 doppelganglander

Thanks, FB. I also read about your numerous medical tests on the overnight thread and you're in my prayers as well.

Daddy G, how did you even know I was here?!

I'm with the government. /

(Just guessed you would be if you were still in town).

33 jorline  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:31:00pm

re: #13 alegrias

Poor Myrtle Beach, burning. Anyone here have an eyewitness account?

We're a tinderbox in south Texas. Wind here now are out of the SE at 25mph, gusting to 45mph.
"The Weather Channel" would call these hurricane force winds...global warming La Nina style.

34 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:31:29pm

re: #19 doppelganglander

Not yet. Thanks for asking. I'm lurking here to keep my sanity and I'll post as soon as I hear anything.

Just got an email reply from Goddess.
She knows, is praying, and will add to the prayer list.

35 Clubsec  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:31:53pm

OK ... so now I'm gonna find out how many 'transactions' there are on this here LGF thing from the time I insert this here message and then exit the comment area to see how many (from the present 17) comments get posted. OK here goes. 12:31:50

36 alegrias  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:31:56pm

re: #28 turn

It never ceases to amaze me how delicate those huge powerful animals really are.

* * *
An overdose is an overdose.

Not sure why vets have do inject "vitamins" before a polo match, instead of just feeding the horses right to begin with. Any polo horse owners/players here?

37 FrogMarch  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:31:57pm
38 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:32:03pm

It's a strange thing:

I mean, here we are, with a man about whom we know little, and that little we do know very disturbing, at the helm of a nation, trying to steer us to safety by sailing full speed into the sand-bar while throwing navigational equipment and cargo overboard to allow us to take on more water. And everything else that goes with all that.

And all I can think to do is to try to figure out why coal miners dip snuff.

39 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:32:24pm

Spent like 20 minutes in a panic earlier. Couldn't find my car insurance, registration or base permit. I kept it in the glove compartment and it wasn't there. So I'm digging thru the car and I'm reaching around looking under the seat when I feel an envelope. It had slid out of the back of the glove compartment and was stuck behind the dash. Popped right out, but I was going nuts for a while there.

40 jill e  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:32:52pm

“A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it.” —GK Chesterton

41 Fluffy Bunny  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:33:55pm

re: #38 Guanxi88

Survival mode?

42 scottishbuzzsaw  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:34:10pm
Let no man wax pale, therefore, because of opposition.

Let no man wax at all!

*mutter...darn metrosexuals...grumble*

43 wrenchwench  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:34:43pm

re: #39 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

I ALWAYS keep my keys in my right front pocket. About once a year, they somehow end up in the left. Which causes about 2 seconds of panic until I find them.

44 jorline  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:34:51pm

Asinine CNN Polls.

Do you believe chewing gum can improve school grades?
()Yes
()No

No, but I do believe it can plug a few holes.

45 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:35:29pm

re: #34 pre-Boomer Marine brat

Just got an email reply from Goddess.
She knows, is praying, and will add to the prayer list.

Thank you so much.

re: #32 DaddyG

I guess it's not that much of a leap, considering how much I'm here anyway. We decided it would be prudent to wait for more information before driving nearly 700 miles.

46 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:35:45pm

re: #42 scottishbuzzsaw

Let no man wax at all!

*mutter...darn metrosexuals...grumble*

The quick passage of that fad probably had a lot to do with a really low level of repeat business for men at waxing parlors.

47 debutaunt  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:35:57pm

re: #33 jorline

We're a tinderbox in south Texas. Wind here now are out of the SE at 25mph, gusting to 45mph.
"The Weather Channel" would call these hurricane force winds...global warming La Nina style.

I can give you a little help here. "La" Nina, means "The" Nina.

48 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:36:45pm

re: #41 Fluffy Bunny

Survival mode?

Possible. Still, I find myself more and more interested in the details of daily life during the 30's, particularly among rural and appalachian folk. Maybe it's the zeitgeist at work on me, but then, I've always had an interest in the period, and in coal mining (what brought my family here) in particular. Sitting on the corner of my desk at home is an old carbide miner's lamp, complete with flint and reflector. On the book-case, my great grandfather's tin lunch bucket, from his days as a miner. A full set of the FoxFire books nearby.

Strange, indeed, my state of mind.

49 jwb7605  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:36:46pm

A great pic on Iowahawk's site:

"I also added some shots of another car I built called FRANKENCOUGIE... Plus a pic of the sears tower."

Editor's correction -- after studying that picture for a few hours, I believe that's the CN Tower.


Here's the exact link.

50 MandyManners  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:36:48pm

I gotta' get ready for a meeting with The Kid's teacher and principal. He is on in-school suspension for popping one of his best buddies on the jaw for picking on another kid. While I admire his standing up against bullying, I am furious with him for hitting. He knows better.

51 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:36:55pm

re: #42 scottishbuzzsaw

Let no man wax at all!

*mutter...darn metrosexuals...grumble*

When wax
pulls bax
in-tax
and nothing stux
Burma Shave

52 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:37:14pm

re: #36 alegrias

* * *
An overdose is an overdose.

Not sure why vets have do inject "vitamins" before a polo match, instead of just feeding the horses right to begin with. Any polo horse owners/players here?

Yeah, I posted without reading the article. I didn't know it was a shot, I thought they gave them vitamins in their feed. Statement still stands though, people I work with have horses and one of them had a horse that died from an ailment it got from the shock of moving to a new pasture. They are delicate.

53 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:37:15pm

re: #45 doppelganglander I'm embarassed to say I leave the current thread up on my desktop when I'm in the office and comment between e-mails, memos and documents. I figured most other lizards do something similar.

54 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:37:16pm

re: #12 turn

omg, Ben you gotta check out the pic a few scrolls down here:

[Link: iowahawk.typepad.com...]

You mean the one of the Seattle Needle thing?

55 MJ  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:37:51pm

Note the name given by Clinton to her address before Congress yesterday:

National Security Through Diplomacy

[Link: www.state.gov...]

Once upon time, the lesson of WWII was "Peace through Stength".
This administration is not in pre-911 mindset, it's in a pre-WWI mindset.
Obama isn't Jimmy Carter- he's Woodrow Wilson.

56 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:37:57pm

re: #47 debutaunt

I can give you a little help here. "La" Nina, means "The" Nina.

But do you know the French word for souffle?

57 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:38:04pm

re: #12 turn

omg, Ben you gotta check out the pic a few scrolls down here:

[Link: iowahawk.typepad.com...]


Unless you meant another Ben.

58 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:38:35pm

re: #54 Ben Hur

yeah, how could you tell?
/

59 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:38:49pm

re: #49 jwb7605 Poor misshappen thing is going to have back problems. /

60 LGoPs  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:38:51pm

re: #3 DaddyG

Someone just misdialed and got my personal cell number.

Appearantly my number is very close to that of someone in the Center for Disease Control. I could have a lot of fun with that.

"Sorry ma'am, you mean you didn't get the e-mail? Look; just duct tape all of your doors and windows shut and wait patiently for the black van to show up out front. Whatever you do don't panic..."

Just tell them you're surprised to hear that they're still alive.
/ Kind of a repeat of my crack from the last thread...

61 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:39:07pm

re: #53 DaddyG

I'm embarassed to say I leave the current thread up on my desktop when I'm in the office and comment between e-mails, memos and documents. I figured most other lizards do something similar.

I do it too. I work at home and this is the closest thing to having friends elsewhere in the cube farm that I can chat with on breaks.

62 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:39:11pm

re: #50 MandyManners

I gotta' get ready for a meeting with The Kid's teacher and principal. He is on in-school suspension for popping one of his best buddies on the jaw for picking on another kid. While I admire his standing up against bullying, I am furious with him for hitting. He knows better.

That's something that I'm going to have a hard time reconciling when I become a parent. Sometimes violence is okay. We know this. The important part is knowing when you use it.

63 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:39:12pm

re: #59 DaddyG

Poor misshappen thing is going to have back problems. /

Nothing a little bed rest can't fix.

64 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:39:44pm

re: #44 jorline

Asinine CNN Polls.


No, but I do believe it can plug a few holes.


It's a trap!

They released a study today that it does help while taking exams!

65 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:10pm

re: #58 turn

yeah, how could you tell?
/


Total photoshop.

That thing is much taller.

66 Clubsec  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:14pm

And Dop ... prayers for you and your son.

Bummer about Myrtle Beach. Hope everyone and every thing is insured to the hilt. But losing stuff in a fire just sucks.

67 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:27pm

re: #56 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

But do you know the French word for souffle?

I can tell you it comes from the word for "breath." Walter's not the only one here who speaks French.

68 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:38pm

re: #49 jwb7605

wow, I guess we're both thinking big today. ha

69 quickjustice  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:48pm

Or as Abraham Lincoln once said when asked how to be successful in politics: "Raise a cause that gives rise to an effect, and then fight the effect."

70 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:53pm

re: #65 Ben Hur

Total photoshop.

That thing is much taller.

LOL

71 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:57pm

re: #63 Guanxi88 ...and the #1 answer is...

72 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:40:59pm

re: #54 Ben Hur

You mean the one of the Seattle Needle thing?

Maybe, I got distracted (moderately NSFW)

73 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:41:07pm

re: #50 MandyManners

I gotta' get ready for a meeting with The Kid's teacher and principal. He is on in-school suspension for popping one of his best buddies on the jaw for picking on another kid. While I admire his standing up against bullying, I am furious with him for hitting. He knows better.

Be proud.

Be happy he wasn't the one being bullied.

74 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:41:36pm

re: #65 Ben Hur

Total photoshop.

That thing is much taller more erect.

FIFY

75 debutaunt  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:41:41pm

re: #56 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

But do you know the French word for souffle?

Indeed, it comes with a very cute accent.

76 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:42:46pm

bbl

77 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:42:55pm

re: #75 debutaunt

Indeed, it comes with a very cute accent.

"Can you tell me where the restroom is?"

"Oui, Oui."

"No, I just need to freshen up."

78 Dianna  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:43:10pm

re: #67 doppelganglander

I can tell you it comes from the word for "breath." Walter's not the only one here who speaks French.

English adopted it: He insufflated mournfully.

Dorothy Dunnett used that in, I think The Disorderly Knights, introducing Joletta Reid Mallett.

79 Fluffy Bunny  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:43:18pm

Myrtle Beach was the place to be when I was growing up. First week at the beach, beach music, the shag...great memories!

80 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:43:49pm

re: #49 jwb7605

A great pic on Iowahawk's site:


Here's the exact link.

Someone once wrote an investigative report on that photo (seriously -- it's a pretty famous picture). Turns out it is NOT a photoshop -- the girl really is endowed like that. Some blogger tracked down the original photo, and also other photos taken that day. Someone had once put it online with an arrow pointing to the tower, and she became an instant internet meme. Usually the caption is something like, "Wow -- they sure have tall buildings in Canada!"

I wonder is the girl herself is aware of the hubbub she created. (Though she probably creates a hubbub every time she walks down the street, so she's probably used to it.)

81 MandyManners  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:44:17pm

re: #73 Ben Hur

Be proud.

Be happy he wasn't the one being bullied.

I'm pissed that he hit. He knows he can go to an adult over this issue. He got into a mix-up at the park last summer for taking on some older kids who were picking on another kid. I thought I had drilled it into his head to go get an adult.

82 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:44:27pm

re: #79 Fluffy Bunny

Myrtle Beach was the place to be when I was growing up. First week at the beach, beach music, the shag...great memories!

I've never shagged on the beach. Doesn't that sand get into your groove?

83 acwgusa  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:45:09pm

re: #82 DaddyG

I've never shagged on the beach. Doesn't that sand get into your groove?

It can cause a real rut.

84 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:45:14pm

re: #82 DaddyG

I've never shagged on the beach. Doesn't that sand get into your groove?

Well, you could bring a towel

85 jwb7605  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:45:41pm

re: #80 zombie

Someone once wrote an investigative report on that photo (seriously -- it's a pretty famous picture). Turns out it is NOT a photoshop -- the girl really is endowed like that. Some blogger tracked down the original photo, and also other photos taken that day. Someone had once put it online with an arrow pointing to the tower, and she became an instant internet meme. Usually the caption is something like, "Wow -- they sure have tall buildings in Canada!"

I wonder is the girl herself is aware of the hubbub she created. (Though she probably creates a hubbub every time she walks down the street, so she's probably used to it.)

What girl? I was trying to figure out whether that actually is the Sears Tower ...
///

86 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:45:52pm

re: #84 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Well, you could bring a towel

That's a pearl right there. Make sure you bring a towel.

87 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:46:11pm

re: #86 ConservatismNow!

That's a pearl right there. Make sure you bring a towel.

and Don't Panic!

88 Fluffy Bunny  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:46:37pm

re: #82 DaddyG

Almost forgot...it has a totally different meaning across the pond! In South Carolina it is the state dance.**blush**

89 MandyManners  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:47:55pm

re: #73 Ben Hur

Be proud.

Be happy he wasn't the one being bullied.

And, yes, I'm proud of him for sticking up for others. It shows his heart is in the right place. Now I just gotta' get his brain in the right place.

90 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:48:03pm

re: #88 Fluffy Bunny

Almost forgot...it has a totally different meaning across the pond! In South Carolina it is the state dance.**blush**

Its still means the same thing, just depends on if your horizontal or vertical.

91 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:48:23pm

re: #80 zombie

I didn't know that. When I was looking at the photo I was wondering how women like that go about handling men gawking at them. Do they feel flattered or embarrassed? That's a rhetorical question zomb, that is unless you want to answer.

92 Fluffy Bunny  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:49:36pm

Only wimps need a towel! ; )

93 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:50:25pm

re: #89 MandyManners

Good luck with that.
I still haven't got it figgered out after 50 years and 3 kids.

94 Mad Al-Jaffee  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:50:38pm

re: #22 Mithrax

"Everybody says Shakespeare's so great. Well how come nobody's ever heard of him?"

-Moe Phelps, Mr. Show

95 mich-again  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:50:45pm
Even a head wind is better than none.

Not when you are walking.

96 Sunlight  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:50:49pm

Alex Jones is a white power type? We saw his name/show on the VB/WP Euro discovery tour last year?

Re creationism, it is occurring to me that the DI's effort to put creationism in the science curriculum would be like a Jewish organization wanting the schools to put curriculum into a hydraulics class that says, "This hydraulics is just a theory... another theory is that a sea can be separated to let people walk across on dry land by raising the staff..." Really, parents have to be constantly finding out what the schools are telling the kids and giving accurate reasoning where necessary. We do this every every day.

97 KenJen  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:51:22pm

re: #37 FrogMarch

You shouldn't have.


The book Obama received form Chavez was called something like "Latin America the Pillage of a Continent." This might be a stupid question but is Latin America a continent? I thought it is part of North America.

98 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:52:05pm

re: #88 Fluffy Bunny

Almost forgot...it has a totally different meaning across the pond! In South Carolina it is the state dance.**blush**

I'm in Georgia, but it didn't keep me from taking advantage of the straight line. Hee Hee.

99 MandyManners  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:53:36pm

re: #93 Van Helsing

Good luck with that.
I still haven't got it figgered out after 50 years and 3 kids.

It kept me awake last night.

100 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:53:41pm

re: #78 Dianna

English adopted it: He insufflated mournfully.

Dorothy Dunnett used that in, I think The Disorderly Knights, introducing Joletta Reid Mallett.

That's a nifty word. And may I take the opportunity to wish you luck with your rewrites. I admire your determination. My novel is still enjoying its comfy home in my head. I can't wait to go to the bookstore and say "I know her! Well, in an anonymous, Internet sort of way..."

101 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:53:55pm

I posted the following response to one of the "science" articles posted upstairs. Since this is an open thread, and I am working from home today, I would love to share my knowledge of the field with anyone who is interested in talking about the science.

I have said many times that the political and financial interest groups dominate the AGW "debate" that exists in the MSM and the blogosphere, whereas the science is actually pretty well understood and consensus has been pretty firmly established in the legitimate scientific community. I have no love of the moonbats who would try to hijack the science for their political ends, but I don't see many of those here. Here I see the other side.

Everything you need to know is from who the Fraser Institute says they are.

Our vision is a free and prosperous world where individuals benefit from greater choice, competitive markets, and personal responsibility. Our mission is to measure, study, and communicate the impact of competitive markets and government interventions on the welfare of individuals.
Founded in 1974, we are an independent research and educational
organization with locations throughout North America and international
partners in over 70 countries. Our work is financed by tax-deductible contributions from thousands of individuals, organizations, and foundations. In
order to protect its independence, the Institute does not accept grants from
government or contracts for research.

In other words, they are a corporately funded, financially motivated, non-scientific institution. Can you say Tobacco Institute? Scientific institutions do not have "mission statements, or "visions" or any other of that corp-speak drivel. We scientists don't out source our thinking to other assets.

On the other side of the dispute is the NAS (National Academy of Science), APS (American Physical Society), NASA, NOAA and the legitimate scientific community - who were not hired by interest group think tanks.

Since so much of the "skeptic" side is like dealing with the Disco institute, nothing you say gets acknowledged...

I have the following questions for any of the dogmatic "skeptics" out there.

1. CO2, Methane and Water vapor are known greenhouse gasses. Since there are gigatons more of them in the atmosphere than ever before recorded, how can you claim that they have no effect? By what mechanism would there be no effect? Direct measurements of these gasses confirming the concentration has been made optically and chemically at many places around the world. This is not in dispute. How is it doing nothing?

2. If you had huge GHG concentrations, you would believe that the Earth would get more warm. The Earth is getting more warm. We see currents shifting, global mean temperatures rising and the polar caps melting. THis is also directly confirmed by direct observation. Would you please explain to me how Ice caps that were stable for tens of thousands of years, start to go rapidly, in a period of decades (much faster than any natural geological process) by a "natural" geological process? Mumbling something you may have heard about the sun does not count. Since I am a physicist, I want actual science. Give me mechanisms. Please tell me how you think that works.

3. The carbon sink is a lot smaller than it used to be. Please tell me, how massive algae deaths in the ocean coupled with massive deforestation would have no effect on the balance either? How much CO2 was eaten by plants that are no longer there? Why would that not affect the balance?

4. How do you ignore feedbacks?

Talking to the hard core believing "Al Gore! DAMN IT!" screaming "skeptics," is painful for a scientist. They believe what they want to believe independent of the science. No amount of data you wave at them gets through. So, I am now asking the questions directly.

If you honestly believe that nothing is happening, you should be able to answer those three questions in a scientific, non slogan laden manner.

102 Sunlight  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:54:05pm

re: #81 MandyManners

I'm pissed that he hit. He knows he can go to an adult over this issue. He got into a mix-up at the park last summer for taking on some older kids who were picking on another kid. I thought I had drilled it into his head to go get an adult.

They can't depend on the adults because the adults are afraid to stand up to the kids and insist on civilized and courteous behavior. This same type of thing happened to one of my kids. She defended the smaller kid, but didn't hit. Later got trounced by an older kid. The school did nothing ever. The kids need to learn the non-marking nerve take-down methods...

103 Dianna  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:54:23pm

re: #91 turn

I didn't know that. When I was looking at the photo I was wondering how women like that go about handling men gawking at them. Do they feel flattered or embarrassed? That's a rhetorical question zomb, that is unless you want to answer.

"My eyes are up here."

104 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:54:29pm

re: #97 KenJen

The book Obama received form Chavez was called something like "Latin America the Pillage of a Continent." This might be a stupid question but is Latin America a continent? I thought it is part of North America.

Mexico & Central America are part of North America, while South America is well, South America. All are considered Latin America.

105 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:55:08pm

re: #81 MandyManners

I'm pissed that he hit. He knows he can go to an adult over this issue. He got into a mix-up at the park last summer for taking on some older kids who were picking on another kid. I thought I had drilled it into his head to go get an adult.


Sometimes you have to fight.

/John Rambo. Rambo, what like, 25 or something?

106 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:55:48pm

re: #91 turn

I didn't know that. When I was looking at the photo I was wondering how women like that go about handling men gawking at them. Do they feel flattered or embarrassed? That's a rhetorical question zomb, that is unless you want to answer.

Well, usually I wear loose clothing and a big coat if possible to cover up my assets, which are similar in dimension to those in the photo -- so I'm not able to answer your question, since I go to great lengths to cover up anything gawk-worthy.

107 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:56:34pm

re: #106 zombie

Well, usually I wear loose clothing and a big coat if possible to cover up my assets, which are similar in dimension to those in the photo -- so I'm not able to answer your question, since I go to great lengths to cover up anything gawk-worthy.

So you're not Inflated Scrotum Man.

108 MandyManners  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:56:47pm

Gotta' go meet the teacher and the dragon...er...principal. bbl

109 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:57:44pm

re: #99 MandyManners

It kept me awake last night.

He's going to make mistakes - the good news is he made this one for the right reasons and not a selfish one. The zero tolerence stuff on kids fighting drives me crazy. They are going to scuffle, as long as it isn't really harmful they need to learn to deal with it without big brother coming down on them like a ton of bricks. That just opens up the playing field for the bullies who are subtle enough to keep it under the radar.

Having said that these mistakes and lapses in judgement are the opportunities to teach him better and civilize him. IMO that is a parents job not the schools.

110 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:57:44pm

re: #108 MandyManners

Gotta' go meet the teacher and the dragon...er...principal. bbl

Best wishes, Mandy. I'm lucky, in that my children are all perfect, each of them the pinnacle of perfection in every possible way, and so I'll never have any problems of any sort with any of them.

111 KenJen  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:58:04pm

re: #104 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

Mexico & Central America are part of North America, while South America is well, South America. All are considered Latin America.

So it was a stupid question? Thanks for the geography lesson.

112 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:58:14pm

re: #107 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

So you're not Inflated Scrotum Man.

Zombie said, "similar dimensions" but not which body parts.

Could mean his balls, no?

113 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:58:29pm

re: #99 MandyManners

I was always kind of old school with that. If you can't get an adult to stop the problem, deal with it.

Be darned sure you are right and I'll back you up.

114 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 12:59:10pm

Probably old news here, but an interesting read:
The Real Jane Harman scandal

115 MrSilverDragon  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:00:00pm

re: #110 Guanxi88

Best wishes, Mandy. I'm lucky, in that my children are all perfect, each of them the pinnacle of perfection in every possible way, and so I'll never have any problems of any sort with any of them.

Either that was missing a sarc tag, or the rose tinted glasses are working splendidly. ;)

116 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:00:57pm

re: #111 KenJen

So it was a stupid question? Thanks for the geography lesson.

One who asks a question is a fool for 5 minutes, one who does not is a fool forever.

Ancient Chinese/African/Indian/other Third World proverb

117 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:01:02pm

re: #112 Ben Hur

Zombie said, "similar dimensions" but not which body parts.

Could mean his balls, no?


Huge earlobes. Wears a lot of hats. /

118 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:01:08pm

re: #103 Dianna

"My eyes are up here."

In other words neither flattered nor embarrassed but pissed they don't look at you as a person but instead just a sexual object?

119 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:01:12pm

re: #115 MrSilverDragon

Either that was missing a sarc tag, or the rose tinted glasses are working splendidly. ;)

Both.

120 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:01:17pm

re: #101 LudwigVanQuixote

Show me where the computer models have matched reality.

Done!

121 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:01:26pm

re: #117 DaddyG

Huge earlobes. Wears a lot of hats. /

Lip-plate, maybe?

122 ArchangelMichael  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:02:24pm

re: #112 Ben Hur

Zombie said, "similar dimensions" but not which body parts.

Could mean his balls, no?

Perhaps it's that ESS problem from Johnny Dangerously.

123 razorbacker  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:02:28pm

re: #103 Dianna

"My eyes are up here."

But, Darlin', yore eyes don't wobble to and fro like that when you walk.

124 J.S.  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:02:40pm

re: #101 LudwigVanQuixote

All you have to do is say, "Fraser Institute" and (all watcher/viewers of CBC or for that matter most Canadians) we say, "Right wing think tank!" (It's based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). It's a right-wing policy institute (and i don't think it pretends to be "scholarly." (?) it just offers a different point of view or raises questions...usually dismissed by most up here.)

125 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:03:06pm

re: #109 DaddyG

He's going to make mistakes - the good news is he made this one for the right reasons and not a selfish one. The zero tolerence stuff on kids fighting drives me crazy. They are going to scuffle, as long as it isn't really harmful they need to learn to deal with it without big brother coming down on them like a ton of bricks. That just opens up the playing field for the bullies who are subtle enough to keep it under the radar.

Having said that these mistakes and lapses in judgement are the opportunities to teach him better and civilize him. IMO that is a parents job not the schools.

Zero tolerance misses a valuable lesson. When is violence acceptable? Instead, both the aggressor and defender are treated the same. Zero tolerance at school gets you a population that stands by why innocent people are attacked, raped and killed by the predators in society. They stand by while waiting for the principal (police) to show up. It teaches the predators among us that predation and defense are the same thing. That victims are helpless until the principal shows up.

Zero tolerance is a bad idea for a whole lot of reasons.

126 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:03:13pm

re: #122 ArchangelMichael

Perhaps it's that ESS problem from Johnny Dangerously.

The testes are like a balloon. Sometimes, they are empty. Sometimes, they are full. And, sometimes, they can explode."

Great scene.

127 IslandLibertarian  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:03:30pm

re: #110 Guanxi88

each of them the pinnacle of perfection in every possible way, and so I'll never have any problems of any sort with any of them.

Valium is a marvelous thing...

128 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:03:53pm

re: #106 zombie

Well, usually I wear loose clothing and a big coat if possible to cover up my assets, which are similar in dimension to those in the photo -- so I'm not able to answer your question, since I go to great lengths to cover up anything gawk-worthy.

Neither flattered nor embarrassed but uncomfortable then. Obviously that gal was flaunting so turns guessing she liked the attention.

129 Rancher  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:03:57pm

Part of the opposition to power is the press, but that's something the MSM won't do when it comes to Obama. MSNBC was supposedly told to lay off criticizing Obama by GE execs, that was the premise of the O'Reilly ambush.

130 talon_262  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:04:21pm

re: #115 MrSilverDragon

Either that was missing a sarc tag, or the rose tinted glasses are working splendidly. ;)

Or the really good drugs have kicked in...

;-P

131 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:04:26pm

re: #127 IslandLibertarian

each of them the pinnacle of perfection in every possible way, and so I'll never have any problems of any sort with any of them.

Valium is a marvelous thing...

You offering?

132 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:04:53pm

re: #130 talon_262

Or the really good drugs have kicked in...

;-P

You offering?

Just asking; not that I'd want anything, but, if you were...

133 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:04:54pm

re: #118 turn

In other words neither flattered nor embarrassed but pissed they don't look at you as a person but instead just a sexual object?

That works until about age 40, then they get pissed at you for not noticing that they are sexual objects. //ducks

134 razorbacker  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:04:55pm

re: #125 jcm

Zero tolerance misses a valuable lesson. When is violence acceptable? Instead, both the aggressor and defender are treated the same. Zero tolerance at school gets you a population that stands by why innocent people are attacked, raped and killed by the predators in society. They stand by while waiting for the principal (police) to show up. It teaches the predators among us that predation and defense are the same thing. That victims are helpless until the principal shows up.

Zero tolerance is a bad idea for a whole lot of reasons.

One should always keep in mind that police do not so much prevent crime as collect crime statistics.

135 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:05:03pm

re: #120 Van Helsing

Show me where the computer models have matched reality.

Done!

OK...
[Link: www.gfdl.noaa.gov...]

Now, answer my questions. You are not done.

136 quickjustice  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:05:29pm

re: #85 jwb7605

CN Tower in Toronto. And yes, there are many pretty Canadian women, which you only can observe when the weather warms up, or they're vacationing down in Florida.

137 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:06:13pm

re: #123 razorbacker

But, Darlin', yore eyes don't wobble to and fro like that when you walk.

LOL

138 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:07:09pm

re: #124 J.S.

All you have to do is say, "Fraser Institute" and (all watcher/viewers of CBC or for that matter most Canadians) we say, "Right wing think tank!" (It's based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). It's a right-wing policy institute (and i don't think it pretends to be "scholarly." (?) it just offers a different point of view or raises questions...usually dismissed by most up here.)

Thanks J.S.

Unfortunately many people here in the U.S. so desperately want to believe that there is no AGW that they will quote these guys as scholarly. There are Discovery Institutes for AGW too.

139 Russkilitlover  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:07:24pm

re: #103 Dianna

"My eyes are up here."

I find that staring back at their crotch and snickering is effective.

140 ointmentfly  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:07:40pm

In Obama's case the wind is a straw wind made up of liberal gas...

141 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:08:07pm

re: #134 razorbacker

One should always keep in mind that police do not so much prevent crime as collect crime statistics.

Or as the saying goes...

When seconds count... the police are minutes away.

142 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:09:55pm

re: #139 Russkilitlover

I find that staring back at their crotch and snickering is effective.

Laugh it up, laugh it up!

143 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:10:59pm

re: #139 Russkilitlover

I find that staring back at their crotch and snickering is effective.

All the ladies go crazy for my sugarlumps

144 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:11:46pm

...are those anything like salty chocolate balls?

145 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:12:05pm

re: #134 razorbacker

One should always keep in mind that police do not so much prevent crime as collect crime statistics.

Crime prevention is number two on their list of priorities

146 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:12:25pm

re: #144 DaddyG

...are those anything like salty chocolate balls?

Chef? I thought you were dead?

147 Occasional Reader  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:12:47pm

re: #118 turn

In other words neither flattered nor embarrassed but pissed they don't look at you as a person but instead just a sexual object?

I'm going to answer that with a rock-solid "it depends".

For one thing, I think it's very culturally-specific. As a sweeping generalization, for instance, Latin women are less likely to have a negative reaction to being ogled than are gringas.

And for another thing, it's very woman-specific. Some women don't mind, or even enjoy getting checked out (depending on who's doing it, the circumstances, etc.); others, less so. But I'll ask the ladies on the thread... doesn't every woman enjoy it at least in some circumstances? A guy you yourself think is attractive gives you a "wow, you're beautiful!" look and a smile?

148 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:12:53pm

75 Killed in Iraq Blasts

Two major suicide bombings in Iraq have claimed the lives of at least 75 people, one of the most violent days in the country in more than a year.

In the deadliest attack Thursday, a bomber detonated explosives in a restaurant in Muqdadiya in Diyala province. Police say at least 47 people were killed, many of them Iranian Shi'ite pilgrims.

149 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:13:13pm

re: #146 Guanxi88

Chef? I thought you were dead?

His Thetan is with L Ron...

150 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:14:32pm

re: #135 LudwigVanQuixote
Well, we can start with this.Temperature measured how?

151 The Hoopster  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:14:39pm

re: #147 Occasional Reader

I'm going to answer that with a rock-solid "it depends".

For one thing, I think it's very culturally-specific. As a sweeping generalization, for instance, Latin women are less likely to have a negative reaction to being ogled than are gringas.

And for another thing, it's very woman-specific. Some women don't mind, or even enjoy getting checked out (depending on who's doing it, the circumstances, etc.); others, less so. But I'll ask the ladies on the thread... doesn't every woman enjoy it at least in some circumstances? A guy Girl you yourself think is attractive gives you a "wow, you're beautiful!" look and a smile?


Happens to me all the time

152 Occasional Reader  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:14:40pm

re: #148 jcm

75 Killed in Iraq Blasts

The jihadists are certainly feeling their oats lately.

Gosh, I wonder why.

153 freetoken  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:14:42pm

re: #101 LudwigVanQuixote

The must-hate-on-AlGore syndrome tends to drown out any serious discussion of science on AGW.

As an example of what you pointed out about scientists' and consensus, right now the European Geophysical Union is having its large annual meeting. Simply looking through the abstracts posted of the talks and posters one finds no evidence of the supposed end of AGW that organizations like Heartland, Cato etc like to trumpet.

It is not surprising that the general electorate/populace is not aware of what highly specialized scientists do in their everyday research. Still, it is sad that so many politically and ideologically motivated groups and politicians exploit that.

154 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:14:58pm

re: #2 taxfreekiller

Snow Friday to Monday Central Rocky Mountain area.

[Link: www.nws.noaa.gov...]


It has been snowing here (east of the rockies by a centemeter on the map) since this morning. It dropped 10 degrees in an hour and my tulips are going to freeze.

damn global warming!

155 Occasional Reader  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:15:03pm

re: #151 HoosierHoops

Happens to me all the time

Denzel? Is that you?

156 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:15:21pm

re: #148 jcm

75 Killed in Iraq Blasts

Dammit! Dammit!

These freaking beasts just won't lay off, will they? There's not one day of the year when they can or will stay their hand from committing some atrocity against women and children, is there? There's never a wrong time for them to send shrapnel through the flesh of innocents, is there?

157 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:15:32pm

re: #147 Occasional Reader

I think they do, I didn't think daddyg's 133 was far off the mark either.

158 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:15:44pm

re: #101 LudwigVanQuixote

Here's one of my main problems:

The United States and Europe already have very stringent air-pollution regulations and controls. 2009 is not like 1880 in Pittsburgh and Manchester with factories spewing out gases unmonitored. We have laws that severely limit emissions. And those laws are enforced. Yet in China, not only do they not have anything like the air-pollution control that we do, but there is massive corruption and law-ignoring going on anyway. On top of that, most of the world's manufacturing have been moved to China, and away from the U.S. and Europe. The end result seems to be that the vast majority of the air pollution, including greenhouse gases, is coming from China, and other places with mostly unregulated air pollution, like India. AND YET, it is the US and Europe that are being most agressively targetted by the Kyoto Accords and similar proposed international agreements -- with places like China and India are mostly let off the hook.

Furthermore, deforestation and massive intentionally set land-clearing forest fires in Indonesia and Brazil specifically are also a major major contributor to the pollution/AGW problem, and also are beyond our control and not our fault.

Every single person in the US could live naked in caves, and eat nothing but berries, and breathe into plastic bags and bury our breath underground so as to not hurt the atmosphere and STILL most of the pollution on the planet would continue to be spewed out unchanged, because it seems that most of the problem is not coming from the already well-regulated and environmentally conscious developed nations like the US, but from China, India, Brazil, Indonesia, and other places.

Even granted your assertion that humans are THE prime factor in climate change, the wrong parts of the planet are being targeted. This is where the politics comes into play. If the Kyoto Accords and similar treaties fairly targeted China and other developing nations as well as the developed nations, and if the mutually agreed economic slowdown was applied to all nations equally and fairly, then I wouldn't have so much of a problem with it. Instead, it seems like the developed nations were purposely targeted specifically as a way to damage their economies, as a way to boost the economies and political power of "developing" nations. A sort of hemispherical revenge.

I have other problems, but let's start with that one.

159 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:15:46pm

re: #104 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

Mexico & Central America are part of North America, while South America is well, South America. All are considered Latin America.

Uh, Central America is Central America, not part of North America. Canada, the Continental US, and Mexico are North America.

160 razorbacker  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:16:08pm

re: #147 Occasional Reader

I'm going to answer that with a rock-solid "it depends".

For one thing, I think it's very culturally-specific. As a sweeping generalization, for instance, Latin women are less likely to have a negative reaction to being ogled than are gringas.

And for another thing, it's very woman-specific. Some women don't mind, or even enjoy getting checked out (depending on who's doing it, the circumstances, etc.); others, less so. But I'll ask the ladies on the thread... doesn't every woman enjoy it at least in some circumstances? A guy you yourself think is attractive gives you a "wow, you're beautiful!" look and a smile?

Or as my dear wife once said, "I saw the way that girl smiled at you."

"What? I'm a funny-looking guy!"

"She didn't smile like she was about to start laughing."

Some days, it didn't even pay to get out of bed in the first place.

161 Steve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:16:15pm

re: #106 zombie

Well, usually I wear loose clothing and a big coat if possible to cover up my assets, which are similar in dimension to those in the photo -- so I'm not able to answer your question, since I go to great lengths to cover up anything gawk-worthy.

Large eyes to see everything that is going on and a very large brain to process all the garbage and inform us of "just the facts ma'am. Just the facts."

162 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:16:26pm

re: #147 Occasional Reader

I'm going to answer that with a rock-solid "it depends".

Depends on if the dude checking me out is worth checking out by me:)

163 Mad Al-Jaffee  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:16:46pm

re: #144 DaddyG

Do you like putting fishsticks in your mouth?

164 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:16:49pm

re: #148 jcm

75 Killed in Iraq Blasts

Man, there is just no end in sight it seems.

165 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:16:56pm

re: #156 Guanxi88

Dammit! Dammit!

These freaking beasts just won't lay off, will they? There's not one day of the year when they can or will stay their hand from committing some atrocity against women and children, is there? There's never a wrong time for them to send shrapnel through the flesh of innocents, is there?

rhetorical question.

166 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:16:57pm

re: #161 Steve

Large eyes to see everything that is going on and a very large brain to process all the garbage and inform us of "just the facts ma'am. Just the facts."

Jack Webb, we need you now more than ever.

167 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:17:16pm

re: #147 Occasional Reader
OR - I have a feeling the answer to that is very, very circumstantial.

168 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:17:20pm

re: #147 Occasional Reader

But I'll ask the ladies on the thread... doesn't every woman enjoy it at least in some circumstances? A guy you yourself think is attractive gives you a "wow, you're beautiful!" look and a smile?

Yes, absolutely. It can be creepy, though -- like the time bagger at the grocery store, who was my daughter's age, enjoyed carrying out my groceries a little too much.

169 mich-again  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:17:42pm

Elevators go up and down, windshield wipers go back and forth.

Those are the two ways to ogle.

170 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:17:45pm

re: #163 Mad Al-Jaffee

Do you like putting fishsticks in your mouth?

Beats the alternatives places to stick them.

171 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:18:12pm

re: #85 jwb7605

What girl? I was trying to figure out whether that actually is the Sears Tower ...
///

Actual Sears Tower.

Actual Girl.

172 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:18:13pm

re: #107 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey

So you're not Inflated Scrotum Man.

Whenever I see pictures of that guy (actually, I guess there are several of them) I can't seem to get pellet guns out of my head.

173 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:18:43pm

re: #168 doppelganglander

Yes, absolutely. It can be creepy, though -- like the time bagger at the grocery store, who was my daughter's age, enjoyed carrying out my groceries a little too much.

It's a little secret,
Just the Robinsons' affair.
Most of all, you've got to hide it from the kids.

174 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:19:13pm

So much for the BNP's claims to have put racism behind them. It seems these oafs can't even control their own mouths:

BNP: Black Britons and Asian Britons ‘do not exist’

[Link: www.hurryupharry.org...]

Nick Griffin, chair of the British National Party, has defended party literature which tells members that Asian Britons and black Britons “do not exist” and said that the attempt by a “liberal elite” to label such people as British amounts to a “bloodless genocide.”

175 Sunlight  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:19:15pm

re: #148 jcm

75 Killed in Iraq Blasts

Is it peroxide? Like London? or are they still using stockpiles?

176 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:19:20pm

re: #92 Fluffy Bunny

Only wimps need a towel! ; )

You're not a hoopy frood without one.

177 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:19:30pm

re: #117 DaddyG

Huge earlobes. Wears a lot of hats. /

How did you guess?

zombie's earlobes.

178 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:19:42pm

re: #158 zombie

Oh yeah, America emits more pollution per capita than China does.
/need I

179 Occasional Reader  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:19:46pm

re: #162 Eowyn2

Thank you for your honesty!

180 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:20:09pm

re: #154 Eowyn2

It dropped 10 degrees in an hour and my tulips are going to freeze.

Try chapstick. (Before you down ding me, remember I chose the clean version)

181 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:20:11pm

re: #176 CyanSnowHawk

You're not a hoopy frood without one.

Sass you that hoopy frood, Ford Prefect? He posts here from time to time.

182 Truck Monkey  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:20:14pm

Aren't ya'll thinking of this?

183 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:20:49pm

re: #178 turn

Oh yeah, America emits more pollution per capita than China does.
/need I

If The View was cancelled, it would drop by at least 4%

184 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:20:53pm

re: #163 Mad Al-Jaffee

Do you like putting fishsticks in your mouth?

I am NOT a gay fish. I am a genius.

185 aggieann  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:21:30pm

re: #33 jorline

We're a tinderbox in south Texas. Wind here now are out of the SE at 25mph, gusting to 45mph.
"The Weather Channel" would call these hurricane force winds...global warming La Nina style.

Hang in there. That is a dangerous situation.

186 mich-again  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:21:42pm

re: #174 Jimmah

BNP: Black Britons and Asian Britons ‘do not exist’

How about Britons with straight sparkling teeth? Did he exclude them too?

187 Occasional Reader  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:22:29pm

re: #160 razorbacker

Or as my dear wife once said, "I saw the way that girl smiled at you."

"What? I'm a funny-looking guy!"

"She didn't smile like she was about to start laughing."

Some days, it didn't even pay to get out of bed in the first place.

A confusing moment for me was when I was strolling through lower Manhattan with my wife, and she was thoroughly checked out, head to toe... by an atttractive woman. My interior reaction could be translated as "HEY! YOU! THAT'S COMPLETELY... hm... intriguing..."

188 tfc3rid  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:22:55pm

Received a Alert email that the government is preparing a bankruptcy filing for Chrysler...

So, tell me again, why we wasted 6 months and Billions of dollars because we could not let them go bankrupt when in the end we ARE letting them go bankrupt?

189 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:23:28pm

Canadian Federal Court rules: Ottawa must press to repatriate Khadr


A Federal Court judge has ordered Ottawa to try to bring detained Canadian Omar Khadr back home from Guantanamo Bay.

“The ongoing refusal of Canada to request Mr. Khadr's repatriation to Canada offends a principle of fundamental justice and violates Mr. Khadr's rights,” Judge James W. O'Reilly O'Reilly said in his 43-page decision.

“To mitigate the effect of that violation, Canada must present a request to the United States for Mr. Khadr's repatriation as soon as practicable.”

Just. Fucking. Great.

190 Steve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:23:32pm

re: #169 mich-again

Elevators go up and down, windshield wipers go back and forth.

Those are the two ways to ogle.

On Willie Wonke the elevators can go in any direction:-)

191 aggieann  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:23:34pm

re: #80 zombie

Someone once wrote an investigative report on that photo (seriously -- it's a pretty famous picture). Turns out it is NOT a photoshop -- the girl really is endowed like that.

More likely engineered than endowed.

192 Occasional Reader  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:24:08pm

re: #173 Guanxi88

He used to be a grocery boy.

Now, thanks to doppelganglander, he's a grocery man.


/ducks

193 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:24:10pm

re: #156 Guanxi88

Dammit! Dammit!

These freaking beasts just won't lay off, will they? There's not one day of the year when they can or will stay their hand from committing some atrocity against women and children, is there? There's never a wrong time for them to send shrapnel through the flesh of innocents, is there?

Guy I know who did a couple of tours in Iraq. They are at a community meeting with the leaders in the area. Naturally the kids are out to see the Americans, and they brought goodies to hand out to the kids, candy, soccer balls, shoes. The guy I know sees a car coming and all his alarm bells light up.

He's standing with the area leaders with this car bearing down, the troops with the kids are off to his left. He and other are getting sighted in and he's looking at the driver of the car, the car is coming straight at him and the leaders. He's watching the driver of the car while he and others open fire and can see him look at the kids and look back at him and the leaders. The driver diverts the car away from the leaders and into the kids and detonates.

They prefer the blood of innocents the more innocent the better to them.

Meanwhile the guys who decided that a little water up a bad guys nose is permitted might get prosecuted. Some REMFs in DC need a reality check.

194 rawmuse  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:24:24pm

re: #188 tfc3rid

It is called Ineptitude. Get used to the word, especially as concerns many things that the US Government is involved with.

195 Russkilitlover  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:24:27pm

re: #188 tfc3rid

Received a Alert email that the government is preparing a bankruptcy filing for Chrysler...

So, tell me again, why we wasted 6 months and Billions of dollars because we could not let them go bankrupt when in the end we ARE letting them go bankrupt?

Because now our government has a stake in Chrysler and can get better terms from any judge for their unions. Bankruptcy judges are Federal, aren't they? Appointed by Federal agencies?

196 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:24:30pm

re: #172 SixDegrees

Whenever I see pictures of that guy (actually, I guess there are several of them) I can't seem to get pellet guns out of my head.

I think dart gun.

197 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:24:57pm

re: #185 aggieann

Hang in there. That is a dangerous situation.

extremely...fire in the west is scary as all hell unleashed...much of the NM high country is so far back there that if it burns it burns until God puts it out

198 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:24:58pm

re: #80 zombie

Someone once wrote an investigative report on that photo (seriously -- it's a pretty famous picture). Turns out it is NOT a photoshop -- the girl really is endowed like that. Some blogger tracked down the original photo, and also other photos taken that day. Someone had once put it online with an arrow pointing to the tower, and she became an instant internet meme. Usually the caption is something like, "Wow -- they sure have tall buildings in Canada!"

I wonder is the girl herself is aware of the hubbub she created. (Though she probably creates a hubbub every time she walks down the street, so she's probably used to it.)

I've also received that picture, minus the arrow, with a circulated email joke about a "resimay" for a woman applying for a secretarial job. The "resimay" tells you she's unqualified (horrible spelling and grammar), but then she adds, "I've a attached a picture of myself", which serves as the punchline.

199 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:25:13pm

re: #173 Guanxi88

It's a little secret,
Just the Robinsons' affair.
Most of all, you've got to hide it from the kids.


[Video]

What do you think I am, a middle school teacher?

200 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:25:17pm

re: #192 Occasional Reader

He used to be a grocery boy.

Now, thanks to doppelganglander, he's a grocery man.


/ducks

I was going to say something. I really was, but I won't in the name of decency

201 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:25:31pm

re: #177 zombie

How did you guess?

zombie's earlobes.

Pur.ty.

202 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:25:35pm

re: #188 tfc3rid

Received a Alert email that the government is preparing a bankruptcy filing for Chrysler...

So, tell me again, why we wasted 6 months and Billions of dollars because we could not let them go bankrupt when in the end we ARE letting them go bankrupt?

Because our beloved elected class is dumber than a box of rocks and no longer listen to the people the people they work for?

203 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:25:48pm

re: #159 Ward Cleaver

Uh, Central America is Central America, not part of North America. Canada, the Continental US, and Mexico are North America.

US and Canada are North America
Mexico is South Central North America
Everything between Mexico and Columbia/Bolivia is Itty Bitty America
The rest is South America

204 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:25:57pm

re: #158 zombie

Here's one of my main problems:

The United States and Europe already have very stringent air-pollution regulations and controls. 2009 is not like 1880 in Pittsburgh and Manchester with factories spewing out gases unmonitored. We have laws that severely limit emissions. And those laws are enforced. Yet in China, not only do they not have anything like the air-pollution control that we do, but there is massive corruption and law-ignoring going on anyway. On top of that, most of the world's manufacturing have been moved to China, and away from the U.S. and Europe. The end result seems to be that the vast majority of the air pollution, including greenhouse gases, is coming from China, and other places with mostly unregulated air pollution, like India. AND YET, it is the US and Europe that are being most agressively targetted by the Kyoto Accords and similar proposed international agreements -- with places like China and India are mostly let off the hook.

Furthermore, deforestation and massive intentionally set land-clearing forest fires in Indonesia and Brazil specifically are also a major major contributor to the pollution/AGW problem, and also are beyond our control and not our fault.

...

You raise very valid points. Before I adress them, I would like to point out that the political and economic discussion falls under the what are we going to do about it category and not the is this happening category.

I would like to establish that there is a big problem first - and there really is.

Now if I were king for a decade of so, I would do the following things...

1. Even though China and India are major polluters, we buy and finance through our purchases the industry that does the pollution. If we and Europe said that we would place tariffs on their goods until they met better standards we would impact them.

2. For a fraction of the cost of the bailout, we could have had many nuclear fission plants and laid the groundwork for real energy independence and the infrastructure for an electric vehicle fleet. This would keep billions of dollars in the US, out of the hands of people who hate us, create thousands of technical jobs and drastically reduce emissions without altering our lifestyle. It is possible to build reactors today that are physically incapable of melting down. Further, even though China and India don't give a damn, we are still one of the largest problems ourselves and every bit helps - though in our case if we did this it would be much more than a "bit" of help.

3. The other options are that by 2100 or so our economy completely collapses anyway because of the effects of coastline loss, loss of arable land and over population.

205 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:26:31pm

re: #187 Occasional Reader

A confusing moment for me was when I was strolling through lower Manhattan with my wife, and she was thoroughly checked out, head to toe... by an atttractive woman. My interior reaction could be translated as "HEY! YOU! THAT'S COMPLETELY... hm... intriguing..."

The moment I knew my wife was the woman for me. She catches me checking out another woman. Her reaction, "Nice tits."

206 IslandLibertarian  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:26:33pm

re: #162 Eowyn2

...and the beautiful babe in the shorts and halter top says, "Hey you stupid nerd, stop stating at me! Only cute guys get to stare at me."

/never happened to me though...

207 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:26:47pm

re: #172 SixDegrees

Whenever I see pictures of that guy (actually, I guess there are several of them) I can't seem to get pellet guns out of my head.

oh shit, I thought inflated scrotum man was a joke earlier. Now I got to go google that, oh wait maybe that would be a bad idea too much stuff rolling around in my head as it is.

208 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:26:47pm

In all seriousness it kind of creeps me out when my wife points out that a young girl (the age of my daughters or near to it) checks me out. Of course I never seem to pick up on it myself, but it makes me feel like a dirty old man. What kind of vibe am I putting off that some young girl would actually want to check out my middle aged carcass. The creepiest of all was the Goth waitress who waited until my wife went to the ladies room to tell me she would really like to "cut me".

209 The Hoopster  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:26:58pm

re: #155 Occasional Reader

Denzel? Is that you?

You found me out! Dang it..
/anybody seen Boyance today? She is answering her Cell.. :)

210 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:27:44pm

re: #206 IslandLibertarian

...and the beautiful babe in the shorts and halter top says, "Hey you stupid nerd, stop stating at me! Only cute guys get to stare at me."

/never happened to me though...

So she needs glasses then?

211 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:27:55pm

re: #204 LudwigVanQuixote

You raise very valid points. Before I adress them, I would like to point out that the political and economic discussion falls under the what are we going to do about it category and not the is this happening category.

I would like to establish that there is a big problem first - and there really is.

Now if I were king for a decade of so, I would do the following things...

1. Even though China and India are major polluters, we buy and finance through our purchases the industry that does the pollution. If we and Europe said that we would place tariffs on their goods until they met better standards we would impact them.

2. For a fraction of the cost of the bailout, we could have had many nuclear fission plants and laid the groundwork for real energy independence and the infrastructure for an electric vehicle fleet. This would keep billions of dollars in the US, out of the hands of people who hate us, create thousands of technical jobs and drastically reduce emissions without altering our lifestyle. It is possible to build reactors today that are physically incapable of melting down. Further, even though China and India don't give a damn, we are still one of the largest problems ourselves and every bit helps - though in our case if we did this it would be much more than a "bit" of help.

3. The other options are that by 2100 or so our economy completely collapses anyway because of the effects of coastline loss, loss of arable land and over population.

Cut to the chase and just start starving people to death.

212 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:27:59pm

re: #189 Kenneth

Canadian Federal Court rules: Ottawa must press to repatriate Khadr

Just. Fucking. Great.

I think he should move in with that Warman guy that keeps harassing people through the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

213 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:28:19pm

re: #203 Eowyn2

US and Canada are North America
Mexico is South Central North America
Everything between Mexico and Columbia/Bolivia is Itty Bitty America
The rest is South America

Oh geeze.

214 IslandLibertarian  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:28:29pm

re: #208 DaddyG

it's that big bulge...


in your your back pocket...$

215 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:28:51pm

re: #207 turn

You might not want to go there...

216 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:28:58pm

Instead of Latin America, they should call it Hot Latin Women America.

217 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:29:08pm

re: #192 Occasional Reader

He used to be a grocery boy.

Now, thanks to doppelganglander, he's a grocery man.

/ducks

No, no, no. I really enjoy life without a parole officer.

218 Opinionated  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:29:28pm

Clinton's bizarre reality...and outright lies.

Clinton: Israel risks losing Arab support for combating Iran

[Link: www.jpost.com...]

219 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:29:49pm

re: #207 turn

oh shit, I thought inflated scrotum man was a joke earlier. Now I got to go google that, oh wait maybe that would be a bad idea too much stuff rolling around in my head as it is.

Maybe you can find the answer to the question: if you threw a penny at those, how far would it bounce?

220 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:29:53pm

re: #216 Ward Cleaver

Instead of Latin America, they should call it Hot Latin Women America.

arses like a Greyhound bus

221 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:30:02pm

re: #208 DaddyG

The creepiest of all was the Goth waitress who waited until my wife went to the ladies room to tell me she would really like to "cut me".

Yes, that would be creepy. Where the hell were you eating, a castle in Transylvania?

222 lawhawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:30:05pm

re: #205 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

The moment I knew my wife was the woman for me. She catches me checking out another woman. Her reaction, "Nice tits."

Mrs. Lawhawk is the perfect woman for me, as she sends me items to post about Israeli models. So, if she says it's kosher to post, who am I to argue?

223 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:30:09pm

re: #216 Ward Cleaver

Instead of Latin America, they should call it Hot Latin Women America.

I thought south florida was latin america.

224 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:30:26pm

re: #177 zombie

How did you guess?

zombie's earlobes.

gawd, if I can handle that I guess I will go google inflated scrotum man now. sick

225 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:30:39pm

re: #208 DaddyG

Oh man, that's funny!

226 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:31:07pm

re: #222 lawhawk

Mrs. Lawhawk is the perfect woman for me, as she sends me items to post about Israeli models. So, if she says it's kosher to post, who am I to argue?

It shows that not only are they comfortable with their marriage, they appreciate works of art just like you do. :D

227 Kragar  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:32:07pm

North Korea is fully fledged nuclear power, experts agree

The uncomfortable truth has been confirmed by a number of experts, from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency to the US Defence Secretary. According to intelligence briefings shown to academic experts, North Korea has successfully miniaturised nuclear warheads that could be launched on medium-range missiles.

This puts it ahead of Iran in the race for nuclear attack capability, and significantly alters the balance of power between North Korea’s large but poorly equipped military and the South Korean and US forces ranged against it.

“North Korea has nuclear weapons, which is a matter of fact,” the head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, said this week. “I don't like to accept any country as a nuclear weapon state. We have to face reality.”

228 Spare O'Lake  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:32:34pm
A certain amount of opposition is a great help to a man. Kites rise against and not with the wind. Even a head wind is better than none. No man ever worked his passage anywhere in a dead calm. Let no man wax pale, therefore, because of opposition.

— John Neal

Mr. Neal was obviously not into canoeing or kayaking.

229 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:33:07pm

re: #183 ConservatismNow!

If The View was cancelled, it would drop by at least 4%

Those women are real gas bags that's for sure, except for the one.

230 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:33:12pm

re: #227 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

North Korea is fully fledged nuclear power, experts agree

“North Korea has nuclear weapons, which is a matter of fact,” the head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, said this week. “I don't like to accept any country as a nuclear weapon state. We have to face reality.”

Heck of a job, Mo! Let's give you another peace prize!

231 freetoken  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:33:14pm

re: #204 LudwigVanQuixote

I'd like to see the Energy Dept. run design contests for the best next-gen nuke (actually two contests, one to use the stored fuel, the other for thorium), then propagate the winning designs quickly. That the US nuclear industry grew up with so many custom designs and over-dramatized project issues is a real shame. France has done a much better job.

232 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:33:17pm

re: #227 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

North Korea is fully fledged nuclear power, experts agree

Joy.

Fuck the UN.

233 J.S.  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:33:17pm

re: #211 Van Helsing

Now that sounds like one of those early Fraser Institute proposals...(back in the early 90s the Fraser Institute wanted to put poor people in Canada on a virtual starvation diet -- they wanted to have poverty measured NOT in a relative way, but in an absolute sense -- thus, the Fraser Institute figured out how many calories were required before a person expired/died from starvation, then use that figure to determine the level of "rations" for the impoverished..."the one calorie short of starvation diet" -- that wasn't a big hit up here...)

234 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:33:58pm

re: #227 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

ElBaradei never met a reality he couldn't ignore.

235 tfc3rid  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:34:10pm

re: #230 Kenneth

“North Korea has nuclear weapons, which is a matter of fact,” the head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, said this week. “I don't like to accept any country as a nuclear weapon state. We have to face reality.”

Heck of a job, Mo! Let's give you another peace prize!

A big thanks to the Clinton, W. and Obama Administrations for keeping the Korean Peninsula nuclear-free!

236 lawhawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:34:34pm

re: #227 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

The reality is that the IAEA and the rest of the world did nothing to stop it. They would much rather talk the issue into existence than fight to stop a rogue nation developing nukes - and transferring the technologies to other rogue nations like Iran.

Iran may be behind NK for the moment, but I have no doubt that the Iranians are learning everything they can from the NK programs - whether it's missile tech or the miniaturization of nuclear weapons.

237 mich-again  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:34:39pm

re: #158 zombie

Most excellent post and I agree with every point you made about Kyoto. I think its more about income redistribution than combating climate change.

With the prolonged drop in sunspot activity (yikes) and all the pollution that China and India spew into the air, a little extra CO2 in the air might not be a bad thing. I have seen Winter and I have seen Summer and I'll take Summer.

238 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:34:58pm

re: #227 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

North Korea is fully fledged nuclear power, experts agree

Kim Jong-Il conducts nuclear blackmail against S. Korea in ...

239 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:35:05pm

re: #211 Van Helsing

Cut to the chase and just start starving people to death.

So I showed you models whose predictions matched observation and I asked you to answer my questions...

You respond with a vitriolic slogan that I am certain you think is witty - much like the ID people would on an evolution thread.

Actually I am interested in people not starving to death. What does loss of arable land mean to you? Since you don't get it, I shall explain. It means less land that produces food. Since the population keeps growing, if we lose food capacity, people will starve. Many will starve. I would like to prevent that.

240 tfc3rid  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:35:19pm

Chant with me folks...

NU-CLEAR BLACK-MAIL
NU-CLEAR BLACK-MAIL

241 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:35:33pm

re: #231 freetoken

I'd like to see the Energy Dept. run design contests for the best next-gen nuke (actually two contests, one to use the stored fuel, the other for thorium), then propagate the winning designs quickly. That the US nuclear industry grew up with so many custom designs and over-dramatized project issues is a real shame. France has done a much better job.

You are so right!

242 Truck Monkey  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:36:07pm

re: #222 lawhawk

Mrs. Lawhawk is the perfect woman for me, as she sends me items to post about Israeli models. So, if she says it's kosher to post, who am I to argue?

Hard to believe she will be wearing an oversized hat and pushing a walker down A1A in Miami Beach in a mere 50 years huh?

//She is smoking hot now though

243 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:36:19pm

there is HUGE money ignoring nuclear proliferation...scores of thousands cash in bigtime

244 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:36:37pm

re: #233 J.S.

Now that sounds like one of those early Fraser Institute proposals...(back in the early 90s the Fraser Institute wanted to put poor people in Canada on a virtual starvation diet -- they wanted to have poverty measured NOT in a relative way, but in an absolute sense -- thus, the Fraser Institute figured out how many calories were required before a person expired/died from starvation, then use that figure to determine the level of "rations" for the impoverished..."the one calorie short of starvation diet" -- that wasn't a big hit up here...)

OMG did they really? Now I am thrilled to have debunked those assholes.

245 Spare O'Lake  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:36:55pm

re: #222 lawhawk

Mrs. Lawhawk is the perfect woman for me, as she sends me items to post about Israeli models. So, if she says it's kosher to post, who am I to argue?

This is probably some kind of test which you have already failed.
;D

246 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:37:20pm

re: #193 jcm

true evil, and all over a f$%^ up religion.

247 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:37:26pm
248 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:37:47pm

re: #204 LudwigVanQuixote

3. The other options are that by 2100 or so our economy completely collapses anyway because of the effects of coastline loss, loss of arable land and over population.

Supposedly. The problem I have with this is that the catastrophists tend to believe we will have no change in techology before that time, and that they tend to go for the worst case senario. What if the catastrophists are wrong, and the warming (or cooling as the case may be) has little to no effect, or we mere adapt as we probably will? We have no knowledge of whether coastlines will change or how, or if arable land will increase or decrease. We can predict all we want, but the matter is we don't have any clue what will happen. Or do Hansen et.al. have crystal balls?

249 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:38:07pm

re: #230 Kenneth

“North Korea has nuclear weapons, which is a matter of fact,” the head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, said this week. “I don't like to accept any country as a nuclear weapon state. We have to face reality.”

Heck of a job, Mo! Let's give you another peace prize!

Just how many illicit nuclear development programs has this yutz presided over? India. Pakistan. Iraq. North Korea. Iran. In every single case, he's been in denial that weapons were being designed and manufactured until someone intervened or it was far too late to do anything useful about it.

In most jobs, this kind of performance would not keep earning you a paycheck year after year after year.

He's like the Bernie Madoff of the non-proliferation world.

250 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:38:33pm

Good afternoon, lizardom.

Speaking of the opposition, I'm finally getting around to updating my blogroll this evening.

I'm making a list of any and all bloggers in the conservative blogosphere that have either allowed their commenters to assault Charles, or done it themselves.

Names please, no need to link.

251 J.S.  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:39:03pm

re: #244 LudwigVanQuixote

Yeah, at times the Fraser Institute was (hmm...) bonkers? Actually, over time, they've seemed to become relatively more moderate...(a decade or so ago, they were, imo, extremists...)

252 Ben Hur  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:39:17pm

Name names.

253 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:39:35pm

re: #249 SixDegrees

Just how many illicit nuclear development programs has this yutz presided over? India. Pakistan. Iraq. North Korea. Iran. In every single case, he's been in denial that weapons were being designed and manufactured until someone intervened or it was far too late to do anything useful about it.

In most jobs, this kind of performance would not keep earning you a paycheck year after year after year.

He's like the Bernie Madoff of the non-proliferation world.

someone should dig into his bank accounts...there will be some surprises there...bet me

254 LGoPs  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:39:40pm

re: #158 zombie

re: #101 LudwigVanQuixote

I'm not equipped to argue the science one way or the other. The only thing I am armed with is a healthy skepticism, especially heightened since we seem on the verge of enacting some pretty draconian economic restrictions.
I think Zombie's argument is compelling in that if we are in dire peril then it is irresponsible or maybe even suicidal to exempt half the world (China, India, Indonesia etc) from participating in these measures.

A major turning point for me is the recent change from calling it Global Warming to calling it Climate Change. That to me is a completely transparent attempt to shut down any contrary evidence since now the climate can change in either direction, conveniently for them. The GW crowd might as well rename it again and just be honest and call it "Heads I Win Tails You Lose".
At the very least, the debate is definitely not over. If anything it is just beginning.

255 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:39:44pm

re: #249 SixDegrees

You forgot Syria & Libya, both of who had programmes he was unaware of and yet he complained he was not informed when they were stopped.

256 lawhawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:39:45pm

re: #238 jcm

Kim Jong-Il conducts nuclear blackmail against S. Korea in ...

They've been engaging in nuclear blackmail ever since the 1990s and the revelation that they were producing nuclear materials and building their nuclear plant. Everything the North has done is with an eye to blackmailing the South and the US into giving concessions. That includes the Agreed Framework mess - providing food in exchange for vague promises to not do nuclear work (which they did anyways).

That includes the current mess, including making a show of blowing up a cooling tower and turning around and saying that they're restarting the program anyways.

257 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:39:52pm

re: #250 Irish Rose

Good afternoon, lizardom.

Speaking of the opposition, I'm finally getting around to updating my blogroll this evening.

I'm making a list of any and all bloggers in the conservative blogosphere that have either allowed their commenters to assault Charles, or done it themselves.

Names please, no need to link.

Do you want them emailed, or simply posted here?

258 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:40:02pm

re: #250 Irish Rose

Good afternoon, lizardom.

Speaking of the opposition, I'm finally getting around to updating my blogroll this evening.

I'm making a list of any and all bloggers in the conservative blogosphere that have either allowed their commenters to assault Charles, or done it themselves.

Names please, no need to link.

why?

259 Russkilitlover  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:40:30pm

Barack-a-Bye-Baby

For all his much ballyhooed oratory skills, my reaction to his speaking style is the same as Mr. Summers.

260 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:40:52pm

re: #153 freetoken

Yes. You are absolutely right and we have the issue that in this case it is really dangerous. In some sense LGF has become a site that shines a really bright light on anti-science, from ID to the anti-vaccinators. All of this crap flourishes because the average person doesn't know any science or how to think critically anyway in the first place. Politicos have used this to their own ends for ever.

261 justabill  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:41:09pm

re: #177 zombie

How did you guess?

zombie's earlobes.

Now we know how you manage to get those pictures, you blend right in with the freak crowd...

262 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:41:48pm

re: #261 justabill

Now we know how you manage to get those pictures, you blend right in with the freak crowd...

I still say zombie's got a lip-plate, which s/he uses as an improvised camera-mount.

263 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:41:55pm

re: #158 zombie

they can't fine the developing nations and china.
its about money.

264 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:41:58pm

re: #239 LudwigVanQuixote

You missed my response at 150?
I reject completely the idea of AGW. It's bullshit and the data does not support the hypothesis.

If the 'concerned nations' really want to do something, let them find ways to deal with the reality of CLIMATE CHANGE!

It's been going on for 10s of thousands of years. Live with it. Adapt or die.

Ensuring that there is no economic way of producing electricity is guaranteed to make a lot of people die in the dark.

265 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:42:22pm

re: #214 IslandLibertarian

it's that big bulge...


in your your back pocket...$

Heh. Its all white and yellow slips of paper. No green there.

MommyG thinks its the beautiful kids. Good breeding stock and all...

266 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:42:47pm

re: #248 Honorary Yooper

Supposedly. The problem I have with this is that the catastrophists tend to believe we will have no change in techology before that time, and that they tend to go for the worst case senario. What if the catastrophists are wrong, and the warming (or cooling as the case may be) has little to no effect, or we mere adapt as we probably will? We have no knowledge of whether coastlines will change or how, or if arable land will increase or decrease. We can predict all we want, but the matter is we don't have any clue what will happen. Or do Hansen et.al. have crystal balls?

We need more pollution to combat global warming.

Clean air bad.

267 The Hoopster  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:42:50pm

re: #254 LGoPs

There is the bright side for the left..If it cools down..as It will..Just because of natures cycles..They can just claim they solved the problem.. See how easy that is? Next we need to work on Global cooling cause if we don't..We are Doomed.

268 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:42:53pm

re: #221 Kenneth

Yes, that would be creepy. Where the hell were you eating, a castle in Transylvania?

Local steak house. Never saw her before and never saw her again. I think she must have given other customers similar service.

269 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:43:29pm

re: #247 Iron Fist

Glad to hear from you Iron.

Please see my 204. Zombie made many of the same points you have. They are good points. However, they are separate from the question of is there a problem itself, and I have proposed some solutions.

270 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:44:25pm

re: #246 turn

true evil, and all over a f$%^ up religion.

The guy had a rough time with it, not just the kids. He was felt guilty for bringing goodies for the kids, he also had a survivors guilt, he was an armed warrior; "come for me me! Leave the kids alone!"

The incident made the news when it happen, that many kids.

271 mich-again  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:44:33pm

re: #239 LudwigVanQuixote

Since the population keeps growing, if we lose food capacity, people will starve. Many will starve. I would like to prevent that.

The dangerous thing is that through compassion for the poor and hungry around the world, we have done the admirable thing and sent them food aid year after year for decades. And because you always get more of whatever you subsidize decades later we have even more poverty and hunger and entire Nations that can not feed their own people without outside aid.

And in the depressed economy, there will be a severe lack of largess in the old rich Nations to crate up and ship around the world. It could get pretty bad with people waiting for food that isn't coming.

272 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:44:58pm

re: #267 HoosierHoops

There is the bright side for the left..If it cools down..as It will..Just because of natures cycles..They can just claim they solved the problem.. See how easy that is? Next we need to work on Global cooling cause if we don't..We are Doomed.

There is no such thing as a bright side when you're a liberal.

273 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:44:59pm
274 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:45:50pm

re: #257 Honorary Yooper

Do you want them emailed, or simply posted here?

Post them here, for everyone who visits LGF to see.
No quarter.

275 WriterMom  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:46:12pm

re: #189 Kenneth

GTF outa here. I can't believe that.

276 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:46:58pm

re: #258 albusteve

why?

Because Charles should not have to put up with even one more day of this shit, that's why.

277 Truck Monkey  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:47:04pm

re: #221 Kenneth

Yes, that would be creepy. Where the hell were you eating, a castle in Transylvania?

I once had an young employee that, once she figured out I was in control of performance bonus', offered to perform all sorts of services that were not necessarily in the employee handbook. After the initial shock wore off I had to fire her. I can see how people get into trouble this way. If I was stupid about such things I would have taken her up on it.

278 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:47:21pm

re: #206 IslandLibertarian

...and the beautiful babe in the shorts and halter top says, "Hey you stupid nerd, stop stating at me! Only cute guys get to stare at me."

/never happened to me though...

Its not the nerds which bother me (or bothered me when I was still ogleable) its the assholes with their beer guts, their foul mouths, and their sweaty foreheads who look at a woman and see only tits and ass.

279 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:47:24pm

re: #269 LudwigVanQuixote

Glad to hear from you Iron.

Please see my 204. Zombie made many of the same points you have. They are good points. However, they are separate from the question of is there a problem itself, and I have proposed some solutions.

You're still a Luddite Malthusian fool.
But I do appreciate your stance on nuclear power.

280 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:48:03pm

ABC News Exclusive: Torture Tape Implicates UAE Royal Sheikh

281 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:48:06pm

re: #260 LudwigVanQuixote

Most folks have no idea about science, but some of us do. I have no idea where you and Freetoken come from on this, but I have a degree in geological engineering, which is geology with engineering principles, and I have taken courses in many geological topics from glaciology to seismology to geophysics. Currently, I work in the enviromental consulting business.

Where are you guys coming from, just out of idle curiosity?

282 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:48:42pm

re: #274 Irish Rose

Post them here, for everyone who visits LGF to see.
No quarter.

post a list of blogs that criticize Charles?...here?...you sure that's a good idea?

283 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:48:57pm

re: #248 Honorary Yooper

Supposedly. The problem I have with this is that the catastrophists tend to believe we will have no change in techology before that time, and that they tend to go for the worst case senario. What if the catastrophists are wrong, and the warming (or cooling as the case may be) has little to no effect, or we mere adapt as we probably will? We have no knowledge of whether coastlines will change or how, or if arable land will increase or decrease. We can predict all we want, but the matter is we don't have any clue what will happen. Or do Hansen et.al. have crystal balls?

You know you are right, it is possible that we may come up with a 9th level wish spell technology (yes it's an AD&D reference) that will allow us to magically make a global scale problem that would by then be 200 years in the making go away. I can;t say for certain that won't happen.

In the mean time, do look at the Princeton GLDL modeling report that I linked to above. and here [Link: www.gfdl.noaa.gov...]

You will see that the models are not nearly so bad as you might think compared to present data, and they do not make any particularly good predictions.

Now would you also please answer my questions?

284 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:49:23pm

re: #275 WriterMom

GTF outa here. I can't believe that.

Oh yeah. De pooor wee boyo is coming home!

285 rawmuse  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:49:34pm

re: #280 Dustyvet

Were caterpillars involved?

286 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:49:45pm

re: #247 Iron Fist

I take a different approach. We are told that global warming is unprecedented (which is false) and that the science is settled (which is also false), and that we have to do something immediately or we are all doomed, BUT we don't have to reduce CO2 production by either India or China (#2 and #1 producers of CO2, I believe) but we have to cut America's production back to pre-Industrial Revolution levels. Are you seeing whee I might just not trust that I'm being told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but?

Bluntly, Kyoto was not about Global Warming, it was a not particularly subtle act of political warfare directed at the American economy, aided and abetted by the usual cast of characters who always turn out for anything that is anti-American. There was virtually nothing about the Kyoto accord that wasn't some form of subterfuge if not outright lies. Clinton signed the accord, but never even pretended that he was remotely interested in having the Senate ratify it, and the Democrats in the Senate assured him in no uncertain terms that they wouldn't ratify it, but Bush is pure evil and wants to torment puppies when he removes our bogus signature from an exercise in climatological masturbation in favor of, well, telling the truth that we had no intent of passing Kyoto. We never had any intent of passing it.

So, of course, the left exploded with reflexive anti-Americanism that pretty thoroughly proved the point that it was designed as an attack on the American Economy. After we declined to have our economy raped in the name of saving the planet, how many other nations actually met their supposed goals under the treaty? Any of them? IIRC, even Japan pulled out of it.

Before you are going to get very far in discussing "global warming" you are first going to have to come clean about what the real goals are. As long as China and India are free to pollute as much as they would like to, but America needs to put the screws to our economy in order to save the world, you are going to have a huge (insurmountable, really) credibility gap.

Most excellent comment.

287 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:50:13pm

re: #276 Irish Rose

Because Charles should not have to put up with even one more day of this shit, that's why.

so how will a list reduce attacks on Charles?...seems to me you just give the bad guys a list of their brothers in spirit

288 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:50:37pm

re: #274 Irish Rose

Post them here, for everyone who visits LGF to see.
No quarter.

Fair enough.

Let me start...

Savage Nation
Avid Editor
Kirly (also known as The Sneaker)
Rayra
Gordon (aka the Nodrog)
Rodan

289 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:50:58pm

I'm not talking about respectful criticism and disagreement, which is fine.

I'm talking about assault.

There's a difference.

290 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:51:01pm

re: #273 Iron Fist

You do pass one hurdle. Anyone that claims they are worried abuot global warming and is against nuclear power simply can't be taken seriously. Personally, I'm unconvinced about the global warming, but I'm all for fast breeder reactors for energy production. The more the better.

Even the founder of Green Peace has endorsed nuclear power.

291 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:51:33pm

re: #278 Eowyn2

Its not the nerds which bother me (or bothered me when I was still ogleable) its the assholes with their beer guts, their foul mouths, and their sweaty foreheads who look at a woman and see only tits and ass.

I made up a fake "date my daughter" application (tailored it from another really) that included this question:

What is the first thing you notice about my daughter?
___
If the above answer begins with the letter T or A you are advised to turn around and depart the premesis quickly running in a serpentine pattern.

292 WriterMom  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:51:42pm

re: #247 Iron Fist

"Green" is the new red, that's all. Fuckem.

293 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:51:46pm

re: #289 Irish Rose

I'm not talking about respectful criticism and disagreement, which is fine.

I'm talking about assault.

There's a difference.

who's the judge of that?...Charles takes good care of himself

294 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:52:06pm

re: #264 Van Helsing

You missed my response at 150?
I reject completely the idea of AGW. It's bullshit and the data does not support the hypothesis.

If the 'concerned nations' really want to do something, let them find ways to deal with the reality of CLIMATE CHANGE!

It's been going on for 10s of thousands of years. Live with it. Adapt or die.

Ensuring that there is no economic way of producing electricity is guaranteed to make a lot of people die in the dark.

And yet more Disco Institute tactics.

We have the slogan that "the climate always changes..." We have no addressing of the data. We have completely ignoring the response to his first challenge - which answered it completely and we have in lieu of science a link to a blog post showing a radar dish... As opposed to any actual science.

Now, Answer the questions from the original post. If you can do so convincingly, then you may be scientifically correct. Otherwise, please take the time to open your mind and learn something.

295 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:52:17pm

re: #286 zombie

If I recall correctly, the American economy produces at a rate the is about 1.4 times as efficient as anywhere else in the world.

296 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:52:34pm

Good news, guys. My son just called and the CAT scan did not reveal anything alarming. They are not keeping him overnight, but he is scheduled for additional tests tomorrow. He didn't give me any details but he didn't sound too worried. His symptoms have improved and he sounded good. He is under orders from both the doctor and his mom to get his ass to the emergency room if he has even a tiny hint of a symptom.

Thanks to all the lizardim for prayers, kind thoughts, and emotional support. I've been a basket case all afternoon and we're not out of the woods yet. I will let you know when I hear from him tomorrow after his tests.

297 Killgore Trout  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:52:44pm

A little ray of sanity...
On my desk: The Fair Tax Fantasy

I expected to see a lot of comments in support of the Fair Tax but a lot of people seem willing to reconsider the idea.
Now available on Amazon: THE FAIRTAX FANTASY

298 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:02pm

re: #288 Honorary Yooper

Fair enough.

Let me start...

Savage Nation
Avid Editor
Kirly (also known as The Sneaker)
Rayra
Gordon (aka the Nodrog)
Rodan

Kirly? That's a bummer. Avid Editor was always pimping his business on here, and getting postss deleted.

299 mich-again  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:16pm

re: #295 Van Helsing

If I recall correctly, the American economy produces at a rate the is about 1.4 times as efficient as anywhere else in the world.

We work twice as hard but the government eats up 30%.

300 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:18pm

re: #296 doppelganglander

Good news, guys. My son just called and the CAT scan did not reveal anything alarming. They are not keeping him overnight, but he is scheduled for additional tests tomorrow. He didn't give me any details but he didn't sound too worried. His symptoms have improved and he sounded good. He is under orders from both the doctor and his mom to get his ass to the emergency room if he has even a tiny hint of a symptom.

Thanks to all the lizardim for prayers, kind thoughts, and emotional support. I've been a basket case all afternoon and we're not out of the woods yet. I will let you know when I hear from him tomorrow after his tests.

great news...you can stand down a bit eh?

301 Killgore Trout  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:19pm

re: #296 doppelganglander

Good news.

302 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:21pm

re: #29 zombie

I saw that. Some intern at a pharmacy mis-read the prescription and ended up killing 21 gorgeous horses simply by putting the wrong ratio of ingredients in their shots. I'd feel guilty for the rest of my life.

I agree. But I have to give this company a hell of a lot of credit. They did an internal investigation, found the problem, and immediately admitted it. No stonewalling, no beating around the bush, no hiding behind corporate lawyers. They just owned it.

Good for them. It's refreshing to see someone accept responsibility for a change.

303 WriterMom  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:22pm

re: #152 Occasional Reader

When they have no Jews or Americans around to murder, they kill each other.

304 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:25pm

re: #287 albusteve

so how will a list reduce attacks on Charles?...seems to me you just give the bad guys a list of their brothers in spirit

They know each other by their stench already.

305 WriterMom  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:53:45pm

re: #296 doppelganglander

Wonderful news, what a relief.

306 rawmuse  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:54:17pm

re: #289 Irish Rose

I'm not talking about respectful criticism and disagreement, which is fine.

I'm talking about assault.

There's a difference.

I am not a lawyer, but the term Libel is appropriate in some cases.

307 ConservatismNow!  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:54:29pm

re: #283 LudwigVanQuixote

You know you are right, it is possible that we may come up with a 9th level wish spell technology (yes it's an AD&D reference) that will allow us to magically make a global scale problem that would by then be 200 years in the making go away. I can;t say for certain that won't happen.

Bah. Wishes are too easily manipulated. That's how we got our current President. What we need is Pun Pun so he can use his divine powers to make the Earth perfect according to him.

308 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:54:33pm

re: #292 WriterMom

Speaking of Red Green, the great Canadian philosopher...

309 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:54:39pm

re: #293 albusteve

who's the judge of that?...Charles takes good care of himself

I'm not asking for Charles.
I'm asking for me.

310 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:54:40pm

re: #279 Van Helsing

You're still a Luddite Malthusian fool.
But I do appreciate your stance on nuclear power.

How do you get that I am Malthusian from NOT WANTING PEOPLE TO STARVE because I don't want arable land to disappear?

How do you get Luddite from proposing a technological solution to the problem using available technology?

311 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:54:47pm

re: #101 LudwigVanQuixote

You claim that only your side can lay claim to legitimacy of the science of climate. Rather dismissive of the credentials of those you do not believe, don't you think?

Can you state that you are completely free from doubt that the environmental and scientific groups that are pushing the Anthropogenic Global Warming agenda are free from political, financial, and non-scientific motives and all they want to do is save the planet from the depredations of humanity?

Since so much of the "skeptic" side is like dealing with the Disco institute, nothing you say gets acknowledged...


Associating those that do not agree with you with those that are widely acknowledge here as kooks.

If you honestly believe that nothing is happening, you should be able to answer those three questions in a scientific, non slogan laden manner.


The skeptics do not believe that 'nothing is happening'. You are quite obviously presenting a strawman argument. Many skeptics, such as myself, understand that global climate is a highly dynamic, complex system, and our understanding of it is completely inadequate to draw conclusions that justify gravely disrupting the economies of the developed world and plunging us all into chaos.

Until the computer models are demonstrably capable of reliably modeling our global climate, they should not be relied upon without substantiating evidence, and should most certainly not be a primary source.

More study is needed.

312 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:54:56pm

re: #283 LudwigVanQuixote

Now would you also please answer my questions?

You asked no questions of me. I was merely stating that the catastrophists tend to go for the worst case senario. There is a difference between the political catastophists like Gristmill, and the more serious folks on this that can be found at NOAA. Personally, I find Bjorn Lomborg to be fairly sane in all of this. New techology is invented all the time, and at an exponetial rate over the past 200 years. Who says we might not come up with technology in the next 50 or less?

In addition, we should make sure whatever we do is not worse than the disease.

313 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:55:06pm

re: #296 doppelganglander

Good news, guys. My son just called and the CAT scan did not reveal anything alarming. They are not keeping him overnight, but he is scheduled for additional tests tomorrow. He didn't give me any details but he didn't sound too worried. His symptoms have improved and he sounded good. He is under orders from both the doctor and his mom to get his ass to the emergency room if he has even a tiny hint of a symptom.

Thanks to all the lizardim for prayers, kind thoughts, and emotional support. I've been a basket case all afternoon and we're not out of the woods yet. I will let you know when I hear from him tomorrow after his tests.

Thank G-D!

314 Ward Cleaver  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:55:23pm

re: #296 doppelganglander

Good news, guys. My son just called and the CAT scan did not reveal anything alarming. They are not keeping him overnight, but he is scheduled for additional tests tomorrow. He didn't give me any details but he didn't sound too worried. His symptoms have improved and he sounded good. He is under orders from both the doctor and his mom to get his ass to the emergency room if he has even a tiny hint of a symptom.

Thanks to all the lizardim for prayers, kind thoughts, and emotional support. I've been a basket case all afternoon and we're not out of the woods yet. I will let you know when I hear from him tomorrow after his tests.

Did they do any kind of contrast media stuff, to check the blood vessels in his head? I've heard about the genetic defect involving tangled blood vessels (can't remember the medical term) that can turn deadly, but is easily curable with surgery.

315 DaddyG  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:55:34pm

re: #296 doppelganglander Wonderful news. Not trying to diagnose here but sometimes reflux and other gastro issues can imitate heart attack symptoms. Have him check everything.

316 Zimriel  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:56:11pm

I don't like the list-of-names idea either; that really does sound McCarthyite. By all means compile one, for your own records in case something unforeseeably unpleasant happens, but I wouldn't post it.

317 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:56:28pm

re: #247 Iron Fist

That was a great post IF. I wasn't going to chime in on this thing because I'm too lazy to go find the links that refute this man made global warming scare. There are no accurate models that predict this based on CO2 content, the CO2 concentrations are not the highest they've ever been, and you could argue a temperature increase would actually increase arable land. You mark my words, we are probably going back into another global cooling trend and that is a whole lot more frightening. With that said, if there were a way to freeze CO2 levels without the economic blow I would be all for it, for instance more nuclear power and cheap solar cells.

318 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:57:12pm

re: #298 Ward Cleaver

Kirly? That's a bummer. Avid Editor was always pimping his business on here, and getting postss deleted.

Yeah, I saw it over at the counterfeit site and followed the link to her blog. She had a nasty screed about how anti-Christian Charles is.

319 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:57:25pm

Any blog that allows their comment section to be overrun with these cretins is not going to get a link from me.

Period.

320 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:58:38pm

re: #319 Irish Rose

Any blog that allows their comment section to be overrun with these cretins is not going to get a link from me.

Period.

Agreed. I should really clean up my blog list as well sometime. Haven't even posted anything there since November 5th.

321 reine.de.tout  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:59:08pm

re: #274 Irish Rose

Post them here, for everyone who visits LGF to see.
No quarter.

Respectfully, I suggest you reconsider and have people mail their lists to you, for protection of you as well as LGF - there may be names listed that should not be - who knows what somebody might take it into their head to do - you can post the list at your blog when you are ready.

322 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:59:14pm

re: #186 mich-again

How about Britons with straight sparkling teeth? Did he exclude them too?

Imagine the downdings that would (rightly) come to a post that trivialised a story about American neo-nazis with a comment about how fat Americans are.

323 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:59:20pm

re: #309 Irish Rose

I'm not asking for Charles.
I'm asking for me.

you are using his blog to post names of his detractors...why not put them up on your own?...he may have an opinion I would think

324 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:59:39pm

re: #285 rawmuse

Were caterpillars involved?

This video replaced the one seen yesterday.

325 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:59:49pm

re: #317 turn

That was a great post IF. I wasn't going to chime in on this thing because I'm too lazy to go find the links that refute this man made global warming scare. There are no accurate models that predict this based on CO2 content, the CO2 concentrations are not the highest they've ever been, and you could argue a temperature increase would actually increase arable land. You mark my words, we are probably going back into another global cooling trend and that is a whole lot more frightening. With that said, if there were a way to freeze CO2 levels without the economic blow I would be all for it, for instance more nuclear power and cheap solar cells.

Increasing CO2 concentrations greatly increases production of plant tissue. The increase is non-linear, too; a small increase in CO2 concentration leads to a much larger increase in plant mass. Confirmed many, many times in the lab.

326 Kosh's Shadow  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:00:32pm

re: #297 Killgore Trout

A little ray of sanity...
On my desk: The Fair Tax Fantasy

I expected to see a lot of comments in support of the Fair Tax but a lot of people seem willing to reconsider the idea.
Now available on Amazon: THE FAIRTAX FANTASY

Well, if this is the national sales tax, I have yet to get a good explanation of how it is really fair, since it puts more burden on those with less income. No one has explained adequately to me how it would reduce prices enough to not burden people who spend most of their money on necessities.
That would mean they'd need higher pay (because they pay less in income tax than the sales tax) to make up their current level.
A flat tax on all incomes over a minimal level based on family size would be much more fair.

The only way to reduce the tax burden is to reduce government spending.

327 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:00:33pm

re: #321 reine.de.tout

Respectfully, I suggest you reconsider and have people mail their lists to you, for protection of you as well as LGF - there may be names listed that should not be - who knows what somebody might take it into their head to do - you can post the list at your blog when you are ready.

Very good then, my nic is blue for those who would rather not discuss it here.

328 WriterMom  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:01:24pm

re: #147 Occasional Reader

I'm flattered when that happens. And obviously, the better looking the person is-the more flattering-that's the truth. Sexual chemistry is 'out there' and flirting is fun. Women know that men are looking-big deal. We're looking, too. I once read this hilarious piece by a guy that said that if a woman is any better looking than a scraggy hound, a guy is probably yes-thinking about what it might be like to be having sex with her. That doesn't offend me-it's honest. If there is 'sex in the air'-you can feel it, and it's human nature a natural thing. That doesn't mean everyone is acting on their impulses without restraint-but sexual chemistry and power and attraction are part of the spice of life.

329 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:01:42pm

re: #294 LudwigVanQuixote

And yet more Disco Institute tactics.

We have the slogan that "the climate always changes..." We have no addressing of the data. We have completely ignoring the response to his first challenge - which answered it completely and we have in lieu of science a link to a blog post showing a radar dish... As opposed to any actual science.

Now, Answer the questions from the original post. If you can do so convincingly, then you may be scientifically correct. Otherwise, please take the time to open your mind and learn something.

I'll be charitable and not paint with 'you're saying the climate never changes brush'.

Might not have been the best link to the site that shows how weather stations' local environments have changed.

There is better information available if you take the time to look.

I find your statement that 'we have the slogan that the climate always changes' to be interesting to say the least. Are saying that to indicate that the climate doesn't change? The last ice age 10,000 years ago didn't happen?
There's no correlation between sunspots and climate (See Maunder Minimum).
The little ice age didn't happen? The medieval warming was.. what?

Come on. Address the data, not my lazy ass research.

330 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:02:28pm

re: #204 LudwigVanQuixote

3. The other options are that by 2100 or so our economy completely collapses anyway because of the effects of coastline loss, loss of arable land and over population.

Loss of arable land?

Please show me the science proving that there will be a net loss of arable land worldwide. I suspect the opposite is true.

Look at a globe. The most amount of land mass is concentrated in the temperate and northern reaches of the northern hemisphere. If the climate heats up enough to hurt arable land in the already-warm areas, then it will warm up enough to enable the creation of arable land in the currently cold areas. For every acre of Mexico that gets trurned into a desert, we'll get three acres of Siberia or Canada that will become viable farmland.

It is not about simply losing arable land, but losing arable land in the tropical developing countries, and gaining arable land in the "evil" Euro-oppressor northern countries. Again, the fears are politicized and hysteria is whipped up based on a misrepresentation of the facts.

As for our "economy collapsing" due to "coastline loss" -- I can only hope you're joking. Rising seas levels won't mean a "loss" of coastline, but rather just an alteration of where the coastline is. Millions of years ago, when the seas were much higher, the central valley of California was a vast inland sea, a huge bay/inlet of the Pacific. And the end result was that the California coastline was LONGER than it is today.

I agree with your proposals (safe nuclear power, etc.), but your insistence that your position is entirely scientific is undermined by bringing in and intermingling the science with these political scare-stories.

331 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:03:20pm

re: #327 Irish Rose

Very good then, my nic is blue for those who would rather not discuss it here.

it's not a matter of discussion...Charles could post his own 'list' if he wanted

332 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:03:39pm

re: #314 Ward Cleaver

He didn't say. Most of my medical knowledge comes from episodes of House, but it's my impression that CAT scans can be done with or without contrast media. I could find out, though.

re: #315 DaddyG

Since he has a history of migraines and that's how his symptoms presented, I think they're focusing on that line of inquiry for now. My husband thought about the possibility of a heart attack, but that seems unlikely at this point.

333 rawmuse  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:03:58pm

re: #324 Dustyvet

Yeah, I know. Left off the sarc tag.
Meanwhile we are going after guys who put terrorists in a box with a caterpillar.

334 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:04:12pm

re: #270 jcm


wow, it got worse. I hope he'll be alright.

335 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:04:16pm

re: #321 reine.de.tout

Good news at #296!

336 Killgore Trout  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:05:15pm

re: #326 Kosh's Shadow


Well, if this is the national sales tax, I have yet to get a good explanation of how it is really fair, since it puts more burden on those with less income. No one has explained adequately to me how it would reduce prices enough to not burden people who spend most of their money on necessities.


It's been a pretty entrenched myth for quite a while. It was one of the first signs that the Tea Party thing wasn't for me. I'd be happy to see the idea go away.

337 reine.de.tout  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:05:27pm

re: #335 doppelganglander

Good news at #296!

I saw it!
Check your FB wall.

338 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:05:59pm

re: #311 CyanSnowHawk

You claim that only your side can lay claim to legitimacy of the science of climate. Rather dismissive of the credentials of those you do not believe, don't you think?

It is rather foolish of you to think that your "side" has anything even approaching equivalent credentials. Again, NAS, APS, NASA, NOAA, Princeton GFDL, and the list goes on, and that is only part of the American list. My PhD and the thousands of other PhDs, backed by actual data trump your blog.


Can you state that you are completely free from doubt that the environmental and scientific groups that are pushing the Anthropogenic Global Warming agenda are free from political, financial, and non-scientific motives and all they want to do is save the planet from the depredations of humanity?

For the most part yes. I certainly am not receiving a large paycheck from anyone to piss off the oil companies. No one in my physics department is either. For that matter neither is anyone in the APS, NASA or NOAA.

The skeptics do not believe that 'nothing is happening'. You are quite obviously presenting a strawman argument. Many skeptics, such as myself, understand that global climate is a highly dynamic, complex system, and our understanding of it is completely inadequate to draw conclusions that justify gravely disrupting the economies of the developed world and plunging us all into chaos.

You are correct that there are different flavors of skeptics out there. You are not one of the ones who says The climate is always changing to dismiss the issue when you are not making unfounded conspiracy theories.

Until the computer models are demonstrably capable of reliably modeling our global climate, they should not be relied upon without substantiating evidence, and should most certainly not be a primary source.

They are not the only source. Please do answer the scientific questions I posed in my post. If you can do that you will debunk everything... take the challenge. Further, they do match reality more than you think look at graph one in the link I keep giving

More study is needed.

We have over twenty years of study by thousands of professionals. The results are in. What we don't know yet is how fully bad, bad will get. However, there is no doubt that anything looks good.

[Link: www.gfdl.noaa.gov...]

339 LGoPs  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:06:20pm

Just heard on the radio that the Witch Queen of Angmar Pelosi claims that she was never told about the Waterboarding. Should be fairly easy to get a record that demonstrates that she was in attendance when these techniques were briefed.
I heard Porter Goss say earlier that he was there with her when the briefings occurred and he commented that she indicated that we should be doing more.
Be nice to have someone out and out call her on her lie...to her goddammed face...if anyone can muster the courage to actually look into the eyes of a Nazgul.

340 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:06:33pm

Fot UK readers (and users of sneaky IP disguising software): excellent BBC programme about snow -

[Link: www.bbc.co.uk...]

341 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:06:47pm

re: #267 HoosierHoops

There is the bright side for the left..If it cools down..as It will..Just because of natures cycles..They can just claim they solved the problem.. See how easy that is? Next we need to work on Global cooling cause if we don't..We are Doomed.

back in the mid 60s, in gradeschool (I'm old) we were being taught that a new ice age was approaching and if we all just used non-areosol hairspray, the world would be okay.

342 itellu3times  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:07:08pm
Even a head wind is better than none. No man ever worked his passage anywhere in a dead calm.

So, blow ye winds heigh ho.
/censored

343 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:07:25pm

re: #325 SixDegrees

Increasing CO2 concentrations greatly increases production of plant tissue. The increase is non-linear, too; a small increase in CO2 concentration leads to a much larger increase in plant mass. Confirmed many, many times in the lab.

Then please tell me where all those forests went and why the oceans have vastly less algae? Could deforestation and pollution be a confounding factor to your hypothesis?

344 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:07:32pm

re: #333 rawmuse

Yeah, I know. Left off the sarc tag.
Meanwhile we are going after guys who put terrorists in a box with a caterpillar.

Yup...

345 freetoken  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:07:34pm

re: #281 Honorary Yooper

My interests of late have been on integrity, or the lack thereof, in the society in which I live. Of late I've taken a break from the AGW politico-social stuff and been more concerned about the resurgence of what some here would call moonbatt-ish folk on the "right" (e.g., Glenn Beck, tea party organizers, etc.), as I see our society struggling with the changes that are occurring.

This theme (our society struggling with change) does relate to the AGW issues, but is much broader than just climate change. One of the fascinating aspects about the evolution-creation controversy that Charles has focused upon is how intransigent a large segment of the US population has been. We humans make choices based upon our perceptions more than any objective arguments. This of course isn't stunning news - Madison Ave. has long worked on this idea.

346 Zimriel  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:07:35pm

re: #319 Irish Rose

Any blog that allows their comment section to be overrun with these cretins is not going to get a link from me.

Period.

Which is why the blacklist, especially if keyed to specific URLs maybe with timestamped logs, is a good idea. For private consumption only. By all means start a paper trail on some of these assheads.

But I guarantee that posting a list of names will backfire, and not just on you.

347 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:08:17pm

re: #339 LGoPs

Just heard on the radio that the Witch Queen of Angmar Pelosi claims that she was never told about the Waterboarding. Should be fairly easy to get a record that demonstrates that she was in attendance when these techniques were briefed.
I heard Porter Goss say earlier that he was there with her when the briefings occurred and he commented that she indicated that we should be doing more.
Be nice to have someone out and out call her on her lie...to her goddammed face...if anyone can muster the courage to actually look into the eyes of a Nazgul.

let it cook...denile fails at the wall of truth

348 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:08:26pm

re: #330 zombie

I read a study recently about how global warming is going to greatly expand the arboreal forests of Canada, Russia and Siberia. The tree line is moving north.

349 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:09:19pm

re: #296 doppelganglander

I don't cross my fingers...
I'll just thank God ...Is that cool with you?
Just got back from the E.R. myself!
8 stiches right hand!
I'm left handed...
Sheet metal work can be ...Dangerous?

350 Fluffy Bunny  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:09:25pm

Another Bright House service interruption...only down about an hour this time. They are getting better.

Great news Doppleganglander! I know you must have been worried sick, I will keep in my prayers until he gets an all-clear from the doc.

351 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:10:05pm

re: #347 albusteve

let it cook...denile fails at the wall of truth

Image: MedusaGreekMythology_Design.jpg

352 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:10:18pm

re: #349 reloadingisnotahobby

Ouch!

353 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:10:24pm

I'm not interested in assembling any kind of blacklist, just delinking.

354 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:10:52pm

re: #349 reloadingisnotahobby

Yikes. I hope it all heals up ok. Yes, sheet metal can be dangerous.

355 Honorary Yooper  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:10:54pm

re: #345 freetoken

I agree about the changes, and they will be challenging, but you failed to answer my question, and Ludwig ignored it completely.

The moonbats on the right need to be dealt with just as much as the moonbats on the left. There are even strange cases where a leftist moonbat has become a rightist moonbat (Alex Jones for example).

356 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:11:07pm

re: #325 SixDegrees

Increasing CO2 concentrations greatly increases production of plant tissue. The increase is non-linear, too; a small increase in CO2 concentration leads to a much larger increase in plant mass. Confirmed many, many times in the lab.

Yes, and increased warming would extend the growing season for crops, i.e. more food not less.

357 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:11:36pm

re: #351 Dustyvet

[Link: www.seaserpentproductions.com...]

Pelosi is the head of the snake...and she is not really that smart

358 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:11:48pm

re: #348 Kenneth

I read a study recently about how global warming is going to greatly expand the arboreal forests of Canada, Russia and Siberia. The tree line is moving north.

Interesting that you mention this, as Siberia thaws, the now moist bog lands release thousands of tons of methane a day into the atmosphere. Creating a massive feedback.

Even if this were all good news, it's too bad we live in America.

359 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:12:06pm

re: #343 LudwigVanQuixote

Then please tell me where all those forests went and why the oceans have vastly less algae? Could deforestation and pollution be a confounding factor to your hypothesis?

Deforestation and pollution are completely outside the topic of global warming and increasing CO2 levels.

Do your scientific predictions of starvation factor increased production due to higher CO2 levels into account?

By the way - see my earlier link to a study showing that decreasing pollution will

increase

global warming and reduce CO2 uptake by plants, above.

360 Fluffy Bunny  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:12:23pm

re: #350 Fluffy Bunny

Try again, Bunny...I will keep him in my prayers...PIMF.

361 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:13:19pm

re: #191 aggieann

More likely engineered than endowed.

Such endowments are not entirely unheard of, so it is possible that it is natural. Most of the ones you see now are engineered however.

362 justabill  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:13:28pm

I have seen studies on both sides of the climate change debate, what I'd like to see is a study published say 5 years or more ago, that has accurately predicted future global temperatures since it was published.

I know many models have come up with models that match up pretty good with past weather, and doing so is a necessary first step toward an accurate model, but equations can be tweaked, variables tailored slightly to back fit data to fit known data, thus a model is only as good as its ability to predict future data.

I do in agree that green house gasses will heat the planet. I am not sure as to the magnitude of the change. There are also systems at work that will counter climate change. For example, as the earth as a whole heats, it will radiate more energy via blackbody radiation. As CO2 levels rise, plants should grow faster, nudging the CO2 back down. The real question is how effective these feedback mechanisms are.

363 albusteve  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:13:47pm

re: #353 Irish Rose

I'm not interested in assembling any kind of blacklist, just delinking.

in your 274 you said you wanted to post it here...a list of critics

364 eschew_obfuscation  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:13:52pm

re: #267 HoosierHoops

There is the bright side for the left..If it cools down..as It will..Just because of natures cycles..They can just claim they solved the problem.. See how easy that is? Next we need to work on Global cooling cause if we don't..We are Doomed.

Remember the '70's? Spreading coal dust on ice in the Arctic to absorb heat to melt the growing ice? A new ice age was coming.

And now it's warming ... follow the money

365 freetoken  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:14:04pm

re: #330 zombie

Zombie - note that while the upper latitudes will increase in temperature, that does not mean they will have growing seasons sufficient to move current agriculture to those areas. Importantly, due to the high latitudes, the amount of sunlight available (ignoring changes in clouds) will not increase, and the subtropical foods that need high sunlight will not be successful.

366 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:14:08pm
367 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:14:14pm

re: #358 LudwigVanQuixote

Yes, the thawing tundra will release huge amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas, which leads to more warming, therefore more thawing... etc.

The feedback systems are very complex. Some involve positive feedback, some involve negative feedback. Does anybody have a good idea how they all balance out?

368 MrSilverDragon  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:14:15pm

re: #357 albusteve

Pelosi is the head of the snake...and she is not really that smart

I would say that she's a part much further south of the head of the snake... I totally agree with the second part.

369 talon_262  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:14:26pm

re: #346 Zimriel

Which is why the blacklist, especially if keyed to specific URLs maybe with timestamped logs, is a good idea. For private consumption only. By all means start a paper trail on some of these assheads.

But I guarantee that posting a list of names will backfire, and not just on you.

Exactly...posting a list like that will fuel the paranoia that some of these jokers already have about Charles, LGF, and us...they'll say that we're keeping an "enemies list" (which wouldn't be completely wrong) and go completely off their nut about it.

370 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:14:38pm

re: #354 Kenneth
Thanks!

Odd thing is...
All my injuries are on my right side>?
To date this brings my stiches count to 711 since 1967!
But I still look OK in swim trunks!
Go figger...LOL

371 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:15:03pm

re: #367 Kenneth

Yes, the thawing tundra will release huge amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas, which leads to more warming, therefore more thawing... etc.

The feedback systems are very complex. Some involve positive feedback, some involve negative feedback. Does anybody have a good idea how they all balance out?

Earth is a space station; we are here to go.

372 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:16:14pm

re: #366 Iron Fist

Well said, sir.

373 jcm  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:17:03pm

re: #339 LGoPs

Pelosi briefed on waterboarding in '02

In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.
374 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:17:09pm

re: #370 reloadingisnotahobby

If you are left handed, your right side is your "clumsy" side?

375 eschew_obfuscation  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:17:11pm

re: #317 turn

That was a great post IF. I wasn't going to chime in on this thing because I'm too lazy to go find the links that refute this man made global warming scare. There are no accurate models that predict this based on CO2 content, the CO2 concentrations are not the highest they've ever been, and you could argue a temperature increase would actually increase arable land. You mark my words, we are probably going back into another global cooling trend and that is a whole lot more frightening. With that said, if there were a way to freeze CO2 levels without the economic blow I would be all for it, for instance more nuclear power and cheap solar cells.

And IIRC, CO2 concentrations have historically increased FOLLOWING temperature increases ... kind of questions a cause/effect relationship.

376 Kenneth  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:17:32pm

re: #373 jcm

Pelosi briefed on waterboarding in '02

Throw the book at her!

377 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:17:36pm

re: #371 Guanxi88

Earth is a space station; we are here to go.

Language is a virus:

378 quickjustice  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:17:38pm

re: #124 J.S.

Fraser Institute is scholarly. By Canadian standards, it's right-wing. By U.S. standards, it's centrist.

379 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:18:06pm

re: #330 zombie

Loss of arable land?

Please show me the science proving that there will be a net loss of arable land worldwide. I suspect the opposite is true.

Look at a globe. The most amount of land mass is concentrated in the temperate and northern reaches of the northern hemisphere. If the climate heats up enough to hurt arable land in the already-warm areas, then it will warm up enough to enable the creation of arable land in the currently cold areas. For every acre of Mexico that gets trurned into a desert, we'll get three acres of Siberia or Canada that will become viable farmland.

It is not about simply losing arable land, but losing arable land in the tropical developing countries, and gaining arable land in the "evil" Euro-oppressor northern countries. Again, the fears are politicized and hysteria is whipped up based on a misrepresentation of the facts.

As for our "economy collapsing" due to "coastline loss" -- I can only hope you're joking. Rising seas levels won't mean a "loss" of coastline, but rather just an alteration of where the coastline is. Millions of years ago, when the seas were much higher, the central valley of California was a vast inland sea, a huge bay/inlet of the Pacific. And the end result was that the California coastline was LONGER than it is today.

I agree with your proposals (safe nuclear power, etc.), but your insistence that your position is entirely scientific is undermined by bringing in and intermingling the science with these political scare-stories.

Zombie, when I first responded to you, I differentiated between the is there a problem question and the what to do about it question. You are the one who keeps bringing politics and economics. I would rather talk just the physics.

Actually, the link summary from Princeton GFDL addresses loss of arable land in the United states. See section 6. It will get us too.

Now if you do not care about poor people in the developing countries having it worse - I can only hope you are joking. They will suffer terribly. I for one do not think that they deserve to die.

380 doppelganglander  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:18:19pm

re: #349 reloadingisnotahobby

I don't cross my fingers...
I'll just thank God ...Is that cool with you?
Just got back from the E.R. myself!
8 stiches right hand!
I'm left handed...
Sheet metal work can be ...Dangerous?

Thanking God is very cool with me. So sorry about your hand. I just had a couple of guys at the house today replacing some fascia cover that blew off in a storm last week. It involved cutting and shaping the trim coil on site. Before I hired them I asked for their insurance coverage, AND I called the agency to verify it. So many things can go wrong with that type of work. I did NOT want anyone getting hurt and suing me. Here's wishing you good insurance and a speedy recovery.

381 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:18:40pm
382 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:19:54pm

re: #339 LGoPs

Just heard on the radio that the Witch Queen of Angmar Pelosi claims that she was never told about the Waterboarding. Should be fairly easy to get a record that demonstrates that she was in attendance when these techniques were briefed.
I heard Porter Goss say earlier that he was there with her when the briefings occurred and he commented that she indicated that we should be doing more.
Be nice to have someone out and out call her on her lie...to her goddammed face...if anyone can muster the courage to actually look into the eyes of a Nazgul.

I can stare down a Nazgul (being mostly undead myself).
Pelosi - bitch. Lie and lie more. The truth will be shown!
TFK must be busy.

383 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:20:19pm

re: #356 turn

Yes, and increased warming would extend the growing season for crops, i.e. more food not less.

Depends on the crop. True in some cases, neutral in others.

An interesting counterpoint: in the early 20th century, citrus groves extended into northern Florida and even up into southern Georgia. Nowadays, it is rare to find oranges very much north of Orlando. The reason? Citrus is extremely frost sensitive, and the frostline has been moving south over the last several decades. So subtropical to tropical Florida is actually getting a little colder over time.

Some crops - apples, cherries and others - require a minimum number of days below 45 F (if I remember the temperature correctly) in order to blossom; this limits their range to the mid-latitudes. I'm not aware of the cold-requiring fruit production areas moving northward as global warming deprives them of their required allotment of chilling. But perhaps I missed that report. It would have to be a significant move; species boundaries are notoriously volatile, and a shift of a couple hundred miles isn't indicative of much. I'd be interested to hear if this has occurred.

384 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:20:39pm

re: #374 Kenneth
No...
It's the victim side...Obviously...!
I've been hit head on on a motorcycle twice...
Both time they were on MY SIDE OF THE ROAD!
"Chief they missed me by that much"!
//Sort of!

385 3 wood  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:21:20pm

Pelosi parsing her words on being briefed about water boarding:

Pelosi says she wasn't briefed on tactics

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that when receiving briefings as a member of the Intelligence Committee, neither she nor other members of Congress were ever briefed that methods considered to be torture were used.

She did say that the Department of Justice briefed her in 2002 that techniques recognized as torture were approved for use by DOJ. But she says they were told they would let leaders know when or if they used them, which, she says, they never did.

That contradicts what House Minority Leader John Boehner said at a news conference this morning, where he implied that members of Congress who were briefed on tactics never raised objection.

"We were not told that waterboarding or any of these other interrogation methods were used," Pelosi said flatly at a news conference this afternoon.

Boehner had called the authorization of interrogation tactics "bipartisan." He said he saw a partial list of who was briefed at the time on the tactics -- and no one raised a question, Republican or Democrat, he said.

Pelosi, though, said that members of Congress "didn't tacitly or any other way approve of this. ... Any contention to the contrary is simply not true. ... Flat out, they never told us this was happening."

She added, "They don't come in to consult," Pelosi said, adding that she thinks the process of briefings should change, so members can have input and can have "proper," better informed oversight.


Hey Nancy, you admit you were briefed, you admit they said they thought they could use it. And you said nothing. Now you want investigations.

This is going to be fun.

386 mich-again  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:22:44pm

re: #367 Kenneth

The feedback systems are very complex. Some involve positive feedback, some involve negative feedback. Does anybody have a good idea how they all balance out?

No way. Lots of data, knowledge, not so much.

387 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:22:47pm

re: #329 Van Helsing

NO, I am tired of that game. I've posted a ton of things from actual scientists debunking every claim you have made - or the false implications you draw from them.

How about you stop ignoring my professional, not lazy ass research and answer the questions posted in the first post. If you can do that you win.

388 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:22:51pm

re: #380 doppelganglander
That was very smart of you to call the carrier!
Siding and facia has a common enemy...GRAVITY!

389 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:22:59pm
390 freetoken  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:22:59pm

re: #355 Honorary Yooper

Because arguments from authority tend to become fallacious, I prefer to ignore the speaker/poster and focus upon the specifics.

If it helps, I've studied physics, mathematics, and computer science (and have degrees in such), and was hired many years ago by your government to do science (but not climatology.) However, that is all irrelevant to the real issues at hand.

To me, the biggest issue at hand here in the US, wrt AGW, is why there is such a large gulf between what the world-wide scientific community says (that is, indeed, that humans are perturbing the Earth's climate through both changes in the atmosphere as well as changes in the landscape) and what the public opinions have become.

391 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:24:52pm

re: #367 Kenneth

Yes, the thawing tundra will release huge amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas, which leads to more warming, therefore more thawing... etc.

The feedback systems are very complex. Some involve positive feedback, some involve negative feedback. Does anybody have a good idea how they all balance out?

Kenneth, there is no positive feedback for the released methane.

392 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:25:15pm
393 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:25:19pm

re: #290 jcm

Even the founder of Green Peace has endorsed nuclear power.

That would be the scientist founder, Patrick Moore. He laments at Greenspirit how the political environmentalists have corrupted the mission.

394 eschew_obfuscation  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:25:40pm

re: #390 freetoken

Because arguments from authority tend to become fallacious, I prefer to ignore the speaker/poster and focus upon the specifics.

If it helps, I've studied physics, mathematics, and computer science (and have degrees in such), and was hired many years ago by your government to do science (but not climatology.) However, that is all irrelevant to the real issues at hand.

To me, the biggest issue at hand here in the US, wrt AGW, is why there is such a large gulf between what the world-wide scientific community says (that is, indeed, that humans are perturbing the Earth's climate through both changes in the atmosphere as well as changes in the landscape) and what the public opinions have become.

How about "we've been lied to so many times, we no longer trust 'experts' with catastrophic predictions".

395 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:26:16pm

re: #387 LudwigVanQuixote

NO, I am tired of that game. I've posted a ton of things from actual scientists debunking every claim you have made - or the false implications you draw from them.

How about you stop ignoring my professional, not lazy ass research and answer the questions posted in the first post. If you can do that you win.

One of my claims involved the ice age of about 10,000 years ago.
Has that been debunked?
Damn, I always miss the important memos.

396 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:27:37pm

re: #359 SixDegrees

re: #356 turn

Because plants don't need sun and rain in the right amounts to grow as well as CO2 to grow? You have got to be kidding me. Look at chart 6 in the link I keep posting. That is the US guys.

397 justabill  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:29:14pm

re: #326 Kosh's Shadow

Well, if this is the national sales tax, I have yet to get a good explanation of how it is really fair, since it puts more burden on those with less income. No one has explained adequately to me how it would reduce prices enough to not burden people who spend most of their money on necessities.
That would mean they'd need higher pay (because they pay less in income tax than the sales tax) to make up their current level.
A flat tax on all incomes over a minimal level based on family size would be much more fair.

The only way to reduce the tax burden is to reduce government spending.

One idea I have heard is to have the government provide a subsidy to everyone that reflects what someone at the poverty level (or whatever level the govt decides is a reasonable minimum) would pay in taxes. Thus the subsidy cancels out what they pay in sales tax.

For example, lets suppose the govt believes that a family of 4 making $30k per year should not pay any taxes, and the sales tax is set at 20%. Each year, every family of four would be given $30k x .2 or $6k. Thru the course of the year, the family buys 30k worth of products subject to the tax and the government gets back its $6k. In effect the government pays the tax for them. If the family makes and spends only $20k, they will pay only $4k in net sales tax and thus get a $2k subsidy from the govt. On the other hand, a family making and spending $100k would pay $20k in sales tax, lees the $6K subsidy for a net tax of $14k.

What I don't like about the tax is that the subsidy is readily apparent. Each person gets a check each year, while the payment is hidden in the cost of goods. Much like the current payroll system deducts from each pay check before you see the money, and people who get a refund think they are getting money from the govt.

Ideally, we should have to write a check to the govt each year, and it should have to be postmarked the day before election day (first Monday in November)

398 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:29:16pm

re: #380 doppelganglander
I missed "thankyou" and yes it was on the job!

399 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:29:36pm

On a Saturday afternoon in Washington, D. C., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s aide visited the Cardinal of the Catholic cathedral.

He told the Cardinal that Nancy Pelosi would be attending the next day’s sermon, and he asked if the Cardinal would kindly point out Pelosi to the congregation and say a few words that would include calling Pelosi a saint.

The Cardinal replied, “No. I don’t really like the woman, and there
are issues of conflict with the Catholic Church over certain of Pelosi’s
views.”

Pelosi’s aide then said, “Look. I’ll write a check here and now for a
donation of $100,000 to your church if you’ll just tell the congregation you see Pelosi as a saint.”

The Cardinal thought about it and said, “Well, the church can use the money, so I’ll work your request into tomorrow’s sermon.”
As Pelosi’s aide promised, House Speaker Pelosi appeared for the Sunday sermon and seated herself prominently at the edge of the main aisle. And, during the sermon, as promised, the Cardinal pointed out that House Speaker Pelosi was present.

Then the Cardinal went on to explain to the congregation — “While Speaker Pelosi’s presence is probably an honor to some, she is not my favorite person. Some of her views are contrary to those of the church, and she tends to flip-flop on many other views. Nancy Pelosi is a petty, self-absorbed hypocrite, a thumb sucker, and a nit-wit. Nancy Pelosi is also a serial liar, a cheat, and a thief.

Nancy Pelosi is the worst example of a Catholic I have ever personally
witnessed. She married for money and is using it to lie to the American
people. She also has a reputation for shirking her Representative
obligations both in Washington and in California . She simply is not to be trusted.”

The Cardinal completed his view of Pelosi with, “But, when compared to
Senators Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, and John Kerry, House Speaker Pelosi is a saint.”

400 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:29:43pm

re: #391 LudwigVanQuixote

Kenneth, there is no positive feedback for the released methane.

Then it isn't a problem. Positive feedback, where methane exacerbates warming, is bad. If there isn't any, then the assumption that the release of methane will make global warming worse, is flat wrong.

As for negative feedbacks - those that would potentially act to reduce warming - the largest and most obvious one in this case is the release of additional water vapor into the atmosphere, which would lead to more cloud cover, which would reflect more sunlight, which would reduce temperatures.

But I am glad to hear that the methane release isn't something that needs to be considered.

401 Eowyn2  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:29:54pm

re: #250 Irish Rose

"I'm making a list of any and all bloggers in the conservative blogosphere that have either allowed their commenters to assault Charles, or done it themselves"

Before you post a list, you should check out the blogs themselves. Make sure that it really was a comment which stayed on the blog when the blogmaster was available to remove it (stinky can't be everywhere at once)
Sometimes, it takes Charles awhile to get rid of a rampant tirade and we give him that time, you should do the same with any you find. I'm speaking of blogs other than AS and GoV and Fjordman.

402 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:30:02pm

Look, the earth is more or less a closed system; many interdependent factors at work, mutually influencing one another in ways that at present escape our ability to define or predict. All the more reason, it seems to me, to start looking for a bigger place. Our ancestors all migrated from one terrestrial region to another; we should follow their lead and start developing the know-how to get off-world.

403 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:30:45pm

re: #281 Honorary Yooper

Most folks have no idea about science, but some of us do. I have no idea where you and Freetoken come from on this, but I have a degree in geological engineering, which is geology with engineering principles, and I have taken courses in many geological topics from glaciology to seismology to geophysics. Currently, I work in the enviromental consulting business.

Where are you guys coming from, just out of idle curiosity?

Sorry, I didn't mean to ignore you. I have been typing responses continuously to lots of people who keep responding. It is hard to follow everyone.

I am a physicist. I work in non-linear dynamics and chaos. I specifically work in problems of fluid turbulence. I used to to string theory before I got into this game.

404 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:31:34pm

re: #396 LudwigVanQuixote

re: #356 turn

Because plants don't need sun and rain in the right amounts to grow as well as CO2 to grow? You have got to be kidding me. Look at chart 6 in the link I keep posting. That is the US guys.

This is completely unrelated to my post.

405 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:31:34pm

re: #399 Dustyvet

Chuckle.

406 LGoPs  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:31:58pm

re: #366 Iron Fist

So even if I grant you your premis that the temperature is rising and humans are causing it, I don't grant you that it will be the unmitigated catastrophy that you feel that it would be. That is far from proven. But the AGW position requires that it must be so. Otherwise there is no compelling reason to limit economic growth on environmental grounds. we've proven that we can have a growing economy that takes the environment into account. We've been doing that.

Without the potential catastrophy to drive us, there is no reason not to continue as we are right now.

Doomsday predictions are a hallmark of leftist thinking and a necessary tool for them to advance their agenda. Some examples:
- The current Heads I Win Tails You Lose aka Climate Change agenda. well talked out in this thread but clearly using catastrophe as a cudgel to advance their case
- Second Hand Smoking. The leftist "I can't stand anybody doing something I disapprove of" movement had run out of steam beating up on smoker's when the argument was confined to the health damage done to the individual. They had reached a hard core group that would not yield. Then the EPA did it's dishonest statistically manipulated second hand smoking studies and the left got the 'you're endangering others you selfish bastard' hammer. We will all die if anybody, anywhere lights up. The bullshit continues to this day.
- Endangered Species. My favorite example is the infamous Spotted Owl which was used to virtually destroy the timber industry 30 or so years ago. It totally ignored the fact that the bird , having wings, could displace and find another habitat. But it stirred up mindless emotion and denied many good people their livelihood. Apparently, that particular cause has lost it's steam, since I no longer have to buy concrete furniture. Thankfully. Made my ass hurt.
/

407 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:32:24pm

re: #401 Eowyn2

"I'm making a list of any and all bloggers in the conservative blogosphere that have either allowed their commenters to assault Charles, or done it themselves"

Before you post a list, you should check out the blogs themselves. Make sure that it really was a comment which stayed on the blog when the blogmaster was available to remove it (stinky can't be everywhere at once)
Sometimes, it takes Charles awhile to get rid of a rampant tirade and we give him that time, you should do the same with any you find. I'm speaking of blogs other than AS and GoV and Fjordman.

Already aware of that, and I've been perusing blog archives all afternoon.
I need a shower.

408 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:32:53pm

re: #402 Guanxi88
Are you for real?

"Off Earth"?
You were joking right?
Or do I have to read the entire thread?

409 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:33:09pm

re: #402 Guanxi88

Look, the earth is more or less a closed system; many interdependent factors at work, mutually influencing one another in ways that at present escape our ability to define or predict. All the more reason, it seems to me, to start looking for a bigger place. Our ancestors all migrated from one terrestrial region to another; we should follow their lead and start developing the know-how to get off-world.

Clarke or Asimov - Don't put all your eggs in one basket.

410 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:33:37pm

re: #325 SixDegrees

Increasing CO2 concentrations greatly increases production of plant tissue. The increase is non-linear, too; a small increase in CO2 concentration leads to a much larger increase in plant mass. Confirmed many, many times in the lab.

Probably has something to do with CO2 being plant food and not a pollutant.

411 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:33:48pm

re: #395 Van Helsing

One of my claims involved the ice age of about 10,000 years ago.
Has that been debunked?
Damn, I always miss the important memos.

No, the fact that the ice age 10,000 years ago happened has very little to do with present GHG outputs, feedbacks and deforestation and plant loss. Thus it does not matter. The GHG concentrations 10,000 years ago, or even 1000 years ago are nothing like they are now.

Now, if you are right, these concentrations would have no effect. This was my question one. Answer it please. Also please acknowledge that I have showed you models that followed measurement.

412 turn  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:34:12pm

re: #383 SixDegrees

Thanks six, time to go walk the lab along the American. I'll be back in the AM to see how this all worked out.

413 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:34:13pm

re: #409 Van Helsing

Clarke or Asimov - Don't put all your eggs in one basket.

"Open the pod bay door HAL"...:)

414 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:35:04pm

re: #407 Irish Rose
Love when ya "talk dirty"!
Did I just type that?
My bad !...

415 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:35:16pm

re: #400 SixDegrees

Then it isn't a problem. Positive feedback, where methane exacerbates warming, is bad. If there isn't any, then the assumption that the release of methane will make global warming worse, is flat wrong.

As for negative feedbacks - those that would potentially act to reduce warming - the largest and most obvious one in this case is the release of additional water vapor into the atmosphere, which would lead to more cloud cover, which would reflect more sunlight, which would reduce temperatures.

But I am glad to hear that the methane release isn't something that needs to be considered.

OH FOR GOD'S SAKE! Positive in the sense of good for the environment. OF COURSE IT ADDS TO THE WARMING. This is getting asinine.

416 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:36:02pm

re: #408 reloadingisnotahobby

Are you for real?

"Off Earth"?
You were joking right?
Or do I have to read the entire thread?

re: #409 Van Helsing

Clarke or Asimov - Don't put all your eggs in one basket.

Nope, no joke on this one - I do think we as a species must eventually move some or all of us off the earth. Where to and how, I do not know, but I think it is inevitable if we are to continue. See the earlier comments about eggs in a basket, etc.

417 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:36:10pm

I'd now like to get to Iron Fist's excellent post. It will take me a while to type.

418 LGoPs  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:37:29pm

re: #402 Guanxi88

Look, the earth is more or less a closed system; many interdependent factors at work, mutually influencing one another in ways that at present escape our ability to define or predict. All the more reason, it seems to me, to start looking for a bigger place. Our ancestors all migrated from one terrestrial region to another; we should follow their lead and start developing the know-how to get off-world.

I would gladly contribute to a program that figures out a way to launch our libtards into space...with or without rockets.
/

419 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:38:11pm

re: #416 Guanxi88

Great!
It's a long weekend for me so I'll "bone up"!

420 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:39:02pm

re: #418 LGoPs

I would gladly contribute to a program that figures out a way to launch our libtards into space...with or without rockets.
/

There was a science fiction short story some years back about this very thing - someone ended up launching low-intelligence folk into space to get rid of them; Douglas Adams riffed on the idea in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy; the civilization that did that ended up dying in a plague caused by unsanitized public telephones.

421 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:39:14pm

re: #411 LudwigVanQuixote

No, the fact that the ice age 10,000 years ago happened has very little to do with present GHG outputs, feedbacks and deforestation and plant loss. Thus it does not matter. The GHG concentrations 10,000 years ago, or even 1000 years ago are nothing like they are now.

Now, if you are right, these concentrations would have no effect. This was my question one. Answer it please. Also please acknowledge that I have showed you models that followed measurement.

It doesn't matter? the climate changed radically without any human intervention and it doesn't matter?

The models I saw didn't show the last 10 years of cooling, did they? Did I miss something?

I'll agree that dumping huge amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere is not the best plan, but crippling the most robust economy on the planet is not a good solution.

422 Guanxi88  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:39:26pm

re: #419 reloadingisnotahobby

Great!
It's a long weekend for me so I'll "bone up"!

hehehehe. you said bone.

423 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:40:28pm

re: #410 CyanSnowHawk

Probably has something to do with CO2 being plant food and not a pollutant.

Could be.

There's an old trick that makes for a dramatic demonstration of this effect. If you're patient, you can do it at home. Aquarium shops that sell aquatic plants typically set aside a couple of tanks for nothing but plant production. One cheap way to dramatically boost growth is to pump CO2 into the water. An expensive way to do this is to buy CO2 canisters, regulators and what not; a cheaper way is to toss some yeast, water and sugar into a 5 gallon bucket, seal it with a lid and run a hose from it to the bottom of the tank, where the resulting CO2 will dissolve into the water. The increase in plant material is astonishing - you can easily double production this way. It also works for home aquariums where the plants are looking a bit wan; the small amount of additional CO2 doesn't hurt the fish at all.

424 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:40:36pm

An oldie but a goody...:)


Nancy claims that 500 million American jobs will be lost each month if her stimulus package isn't passed.

425 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:41:23pm

re: #422 Guanxi88
Ah jeez...At least I didn't say"boob"..or "gun"!
Nothing worse than a naked ,armed hijacker!
Oh ! this is an open thread!

426 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:41:29pm

re: #420 Guanxi88

There was a science fiction short story some years back about this very thing - someone ended up launching low-intelligence folk into space to get rid of them; Douglas Adams riffed on the idea in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy; the civilization that did that ended up dying in a plague caused by unsanitized public telephones.

See 'Marching Morons'.Marching Morons adequate synopsis.

427 LGoPs  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:41:39pm

re: #424 Dustyvet

An oldie but a goody...:)


Nancy claims that 500 million American jobs will be lost each month if her stimulus package isn't passed.

And stuck with it even after several corrections. A fundamentally stupid woman.

428 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:42:41pm

re: #425 reloadingisnotahobby

Ah jeez...At least I didn't say"boob"..or "gun"!
Nothing worse than a naked ,armed hijacker!
Oh ! this is an open thread!


Don't make me dredge up the Furry Freak Brothers again.

429 UberInfidel67  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:43:08pm

re: #174 Jimmah

So much for the BNP's claims to have put racism behind them. It seems these oafs can't even control their own mouths:

BNP: Black Britons and Asian Britons ‘do not exist’

[Link: www.hurryupharry.org...]

So what? It has been a bone of contention here in America when people refer to themselves as such. Don't we all agree that we are just Americans? Looks like the same thing to me. Perhaps you just do not care for the messenger?

430 beens21  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:43:21pm

one point on CO2 in the atmosphere, 380 ppm now vs roughly 300 ppm preindustrial times. To give perspective, if the atmosphere were laid out lineally to equal a 100 yard football field, present CO2 would be at the 1.36 inch line, and preindustrial at the 1.08 inch line.Gore has testified that he would be happy with a 350 ppm CO2, or moving from the 1.36 inch line to the 1.26 inch line. Seems to me like a whole lotta fuss over nothing statistically significant.

431 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:43:27pm

re: #428 Van Helsing

Don't make me dredge up the Furry Freak Brothers again.

Fat Freddy's Cat...:)

432 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:43:37pm

re: #423 SixDegrees

Could be.

There's an old trick that makes for a dramatic demonstration of this effect. If you're patient, you can do it at home. Aquarium shops that sell aquatic plants typically set aside a couple of tanks for nothing but plant production. One cheap way to dramatically boost growth is to pump CO2 into the water. An expensive way to do this is to buy CO2 canisters, regulators and what not; a cheaper way is to toss some yeast, water and sugar into a 5 gallon bucket, seal it with a lid and run a hose from it to the bottom of the tank, where the resulting CO2 will dissolve into the water. The increase in plant material is astonishing - you can easily double production this way. It also works for home aquariums where the plants are looking a bit wan; the small amount of additional CO2 doesn't hurt the fish at all.

Beer!

433 Soona'  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:44:05pm

re: #427 LGoPs

And stuck with it even after several corrections. A fundamentally stupid woman.

Stupid and powerful. A really really bad combination.

434 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:44:16pm

re: #428 Van Helsing
Link please.?...///
No really...///

435 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:44:27pm

re: #431 Dustyvet

Fat Freddy's Cat...:)

Image: FatFreddysCat1.gif

436 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:44:55pm

re: #431 Dustyvet

Fat Freddy's Cat...:)

Evil. You are evil, sir.
Now I have to go look again.

437 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:45:50pm

re: #436 Van Helsing

Evil. You are evil, sir.
Now I have to go look again.

ROFLMAO...:)

438 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:47:07pm

re: #366 Iron Fist

This is an absolute worst-case scenario.

No. It is a mid range scenario. Worst case scenarios involve a world with a population of over 12 billion and enough food capacity to feed three billiio. I did not comment on how bad it will get. I said that we know it will get bad. I said that there are NO predictions from the models that look good. Best case scenario, still has the US farm belt in a lot of trouble by the next century also.

That hardly makes it a likely scenario. One of the problems I have this topic is that if you grant that there is even the possibility of there being an issue, the next step is destroy western civilization to save the world.

So how exactly would switching to nuclear and deploying better emissions controls destroy our civilization?

To be charitable, one doesn't logically lead to the other. Does the scope of human endevor have an impact of the environment? The answer to that question is obviously yes. Does this mean that if things continue in the manner that they have been, your catastrophic worst case will happen? The answer to this question is probably not. The temperature of the world has been much higher in the past, especially if you go back far enough. It has been much cooler at times as well. While we aren't likely to see glaciers marching towards the equator in my lifetime (the climate catastrophy that was supposed to be just around the bend when I was a child), we aren't likely to see all of the polar ice melt away in my lifetime, either.

Actually human influence was strong enough to reverse the trend towards cooling. AGW is not as bad as it could have been because we turned it around from marching to colder. That should give you an idea of how bad the problem really is. There would have been an ice age otherwise.


Before we can really debate what, if anything, needs to be done about it, we need to reach a reasonable consensus to what the scope of the problem really is.
And that consensus has been reached by the scientific community. It just isn't very popular here with people who are afraid that we scientists are secret hippies who want to take all of your toys away.


I suspect that the planet would survive it again.

To quote George Carlin, the planet is not in trouble. WE are in trouble.

439 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:47:21pm

re: #437 Dustyvet

ROFLMAO...:)

Image: FatFreddiesCat.jpg

440 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:47:49pm

re: #432 Van Helsing
I'm feeling a little wane..
Have any Heineken's?
...OK! Bud!

441 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:49:32pm

re: #440 reloadingisnotahobby

I'm feeling a little wane..
Have any Heineken's?
...OK! Bud!

I've got some left over Winter Ales from a couple of breweries...
I don't much like the light stuff.

442 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:50:35pm

re: #421 Van Helsing

It doesn't matter? the climate changed radically without any human intervention and it doesn't matter?

The models I saw didn't show the last 10 years of cooling, did they? Did I miss something?

I'll agree that dumping huge amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere is not the best plan, but crippling the most robust economy on the planet is not a good solution.

It's like talking to a wall. It doesn't matter because we are looking at more dramatic changes over much shorter time frames under completely different conditions.

Now answer please the original three questions. Try it. The fact that you can't only shows that you are wrong.

443 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:50:49pm

The Liberal Code of Beliefs

I'm a Liberal because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.

I'm a Liberal because I love the fact I can now marry whatever I want. I've decided to marry my horse.

I'm a Liberal because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.

I'm a Liberal because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.

I'm a Liberal because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.

I'm a Liberal because when we pull out of Iraq I trust the bad guys will stop what they're doing because they now think we're good people.

I'm a Liberal because I believe people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday, CAN tell us the polar ice caps will melt away in 10 years if I don't start driving a Prius.

I'm a Liberal because I believe business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as THEY see fit.

I'm a Liberal because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who could NEVER get their agendas past the voters.

A Liberal has to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts of the constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain parts of the Constitution.

A Liberal has to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

I'm a Liberal because my head is so firmly planted up my own butt, it's unlikely I'll ever have another point of view.

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."

444 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:51:54pm

re: #441 Van Helsing

After my shitty day I'm going home and telling Mrs.Loader...
Yes...It's a BEER!...Ya want one ?

445 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:52:55pm

re: #439 Dustyvet

[Link: upload.wikimedia.org...]

I'll hate myself when if I sober up. Freaks

446 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:55:17pm

re: #443 Dustyvet

I reget I can up ding ya one!

447 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:58:24pm

re: #410 CyanSnowHawk

re: #325 SixDegrees

No you both missed my point about sun and rain and pollution. Yes, if there is more CO2 plants are happy. However, if the region of ocean they live in is too polluted for them to love (as in the case of the algae) more CO2 does not matter.

If the trees are cut down, they can not eat the CO2, because they were cut down. So your argument still doesn't matter.

If your crops don't get enough rain because the climate patters have shifted, it does not matter.

448 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:58:50pm

If beer is the topic, you might be interested in knowing that Beamish Brewery in Ireland is closing it's doors after 210 years in business.


DUBLIN, Ireland (AP) -- Dutch brewing giant Heineken NV announced Thursday it is closing one of Ireland's oldest breweries, Beamish & Crawford in the city of Cork, just weeks after taking control of the operation.

Heineken said the brewery -- best known for making Beamish, one of Ireland's three brands of dark-brown stout -- would close in March with the loss of 120 jobs, about three-fifths of the work force.

The rest would transfer to the Cork brewery that Heineken has owned since 1983 -- and where it already makes Cork's rival stout, Murphy's.

Gerrit van Loo, managing director of Heineken Ireland, called it "the most difficult decision we have ever had to make." He pledged that the Beamish brand would survive and be produced alongside Murphy's, which can be a bit creamier and sweeter than the sharper-edged Beamish.

"Retaining two breweries is not sustainable and the loss of so many jobs remains a sad but unavoidable outcome," he said.

Heineken gained control of the Beamish brewery only in October after a six-month investigation by Ireland's Competition Authority ruled -- to the disgust and disbelief of many Irishmen -- that it wouldn't be a conflict of interest for Heineken to produce both stouts.

Business and political leaders warned that the takeover would mean the death-knell of the 210-year-old brewery. Few expected the announcement so soon.

"It is vital that investment in the Beamish brands, particularly Beamish stout, continues and that the brand is developed to its full potential," said Cork lawmaker Ciaran Lynch. "The worst possible outcome would be the loss not just of jobs, but of an internationally renowned brand which is of significant value to the economy."

Another legislator, Deirdre Clune, called it "a dreadful day" for the brewery workers as well as Ireland's heritage. She called on Heineken to spell out what it will do to the brewery, a Cork landmark beside the city's medieval South Gate.

Both Cork brands have long struggled for market share against Ireland's Goliath of stouts, Dublin-based Guinness, which is owned by British drinks company Diageo. Together the Cork stouts account for fewer than one in 10 pints of "the black stuff" sold in Ireland.

But the brewing industry in Ireland as a whole is feeling pressure from increased competition in Eastern Europe and Asia, and stout in particular is shunned by Ireland's trendy young drinkers, who tend to favor lighter lagers and vodka-based drinks. Earlier this year Diageo announced it will close two of its four breweries and cut back operations at its 249-year-old Guinness brewery in Dublin, in favor of a future state-of-the-art brewery to be built on the capital's outskirts.

Heineken won ownership of Beamish's brands and brewery as part of a much larger joint takeover, with Danish brewers Carlsberg, of British brewers Scottish & Newcastle.

A dutch brewing company will now be producing Murphys and Beamish, it's a sad day in Cork and all over Ireland.

We're finishing up the last authentic barrels of Beamish at the pub where I play, as of this writing.

449 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:59:14pm

re: #448 Irish Rose

If beer is the topic, you might be interested in knowing that Beamish Brewery in Ireland is closing it's doors after 210 years in business.

A dutch brewing company will now be producing Murphys and Beamish, it's a sad day in Cork and all over Ireland.

We're finishing up the last authentic barrels of Beamish at the pub where I play, as of this writing.



NOOO!

450 Irish Rose  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 2:59:40pm

re: #440 reloadingisnotahobby

I'm feeling a little wane..
Have any Heineken's?
...OK! Bud!

Fuck Heineken.

451 razorbacker  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:00:14pm

I don't pretend to know much about human-caused global warming. I did note with some interest the other day that fat people are catching some blame for global warming.

And that I haven't seen Al Gore since.

Co-inky-dinkal, I'm sure.

452 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:01:11pm

1. CO2, Methane and Water vapor are known greenhouse gasses. Since there are gigatons more of them in the atmosphere than ever before recorded, how can you claim that they have no effect? By what mechanism would there be no effect? Direct measurements of these gasses confirming the concentration has been made optically and chemically at many places around the world. This is not in dispute. How is it doing nothing?

Methane and water vapor are far greater green house gasses tha CO2. The percentage of CO2 attributed to human activity is miniscule.


2. If you had huge GHG concentrations, you would believe that the Earth would get more warm. The Earth is getting more warm. We see currents shifting, global mean temperatures rising and the polar caps melting. THis is also directly confirmed by direct observation. Would you please explain to me how Ice caps that were stable for tens of thousands of years, start to go rapidly, in a period of decades (much faster than any natural geological process) by a "natural" geological process? Mumbling something you may have heard about the sun does not count. Since I am a physicist, I want actual science. Give me mechanisms. Please tell me how you think that works.

Ice caps have not been stable for tens of thousands of years.


3. The carbon sink is a lot smaller than it used to be. Please tell me, how massive algae deaths in the ocean coupled with massive deforestation would have no effect on the balance either? How much CO2 was eaten by plants that are no longer there? Why would that not affect the balance?

Again, CO2 as a green house is far less efficient than methane or water vapor. For methane, we really don't know what the concentrations were. I'm pretty sure though that the Bison that 'covered the plain to the horizons' were farting.

453 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:01:46pm

re: #447 LudwigVanQuixote

re: #325 SixDegrees

No you both missed my point about sun and rain and pollution. Yes, if there is more CO2 plants are happy. However, if the region of ocean they live in is too polluted for them to love (as in the case of the algae) more CO2 does not matter.

If the trees are cut down, they can not eat the CO2, because they were cut down. So your argument still doesn't matter.

If your crops don't get enough rain because the climate patters have shifted, it does not matter.

None of this addresses my observations.

454 axegrinder  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:02:15pm

How's secret-hippie-scientist-gammie-buttocks taste today Lizards? I skipped lunch and I'm ready to partake.

455 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:02:17pm

re: #449 BeerDrinking_VictoryMonkey
We would expect no less...!
Beerdrinkingcapitulationmonkey!
Just pulling your tail...!
///

456 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:03:16pm

re: #450 Irish Rose

Ya ever tried to buy good beer in fu%$ing UTAH?

457 kansas  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:03:50pm

re: #69 quickjustice

Or as Abraham Lincoln once said when asked how to be successful in politics: "Raise a cause that gives rise to an effect, and then fight the effect."

Sure that wasn't Saul Alinsky?

458 SixDegrees  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:03:59pm

re: #452 Van Helsing

Ice caps have not been stable for tens of thousands of years, ever.

FTFY.

459 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:04:19pm

re: #456 reloadingisnotahobby

Ya ever tried to buy good beer in fu%$ing UTAH?

Or for that matter a good wine?

460 axegrinder  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:04:51pm

re: #445 Van Helsing

I'll hate myself when if I sober up. Freaks

My Gawd-they still print that comic? I remember that from the 70's. R. Crumb stuff in there.

461 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:05:32pm

re: #459 Dustyvet

Thank goodness Nevada's 3.5 hours down the road!

462 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:06:30pm

re: #458 SixDegrees

Thanks.

463 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:06:35pm

re: #283 LudwigVanQuixote

You know you are right, it is possible that we may come up with a 9th level wish spell technology (yes it's an AD&D reference) that will allow us to magically make a global scale problem that would by then be 200 years in the making go away. I can;t say for certain that won't happen.

In the mean time, do look at the Princeton GLDL modeling report that I linked to above. and here [Link: www.gfdl.noaa.gov...]

You will see that the models are not nearly so bad as you might think compared to present data, and they do not make any particularly good predictions.

Now would you also please answer my questions?

Just to clarify, the models are in agreement with data more than someone from the skeptic side might think, and the predictions that they make are not so good for us in the long run.

464 Dustyvet  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:07:38pm

re: #456 reloadingisnotahobby

Ya ever tried to buy good beer in fu%$ing UTAH?

Even better, if you:

1. Smoke

2. Your single

3. Your not a Mormon.

GOOD LUCK FINDING AN APARTMENT...:(

465 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:08:39pm

re: #453 SixDegrees

None of this addresses my observations.

Which are what then? Perhaps I did not understand. What I am saying is that more CO2 in the atmosphere and AGW are not good for plants despite your observations, and we still have a problem.

466 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:08:43pm

re: #460 axegrinder

My Gawd-they still print that comic? I remember that from the 70's. R. Crumb stuff in there.

If you really want to, I'm sure you can find Mr. Natural and Snatch Comics out there somewhere.

467 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:08:56pm

re: #448 Irish Rose

Here, you can have mine.

468 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:09:52pm

re: #464 Dustyvet
Odd that!
I've a good job!
Smoked ,but no more!
Bought at the right time!
...Wow! I'm still not Mormon!

469 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:13:11pm

re: #467 UFO TOFU

That's crazy!
I was at the Redlands Airport in Oct last time I was out there!
and saw that !
Still have friends that work or fly out there!
I worked as a Mech and ran the fuel service there 1975 thru 1978!
That's just funny!

470 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:14:17pm

re: #469 reloadingisnotahobby

Do you get out here often?

471 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:16:26pm

re: #470 UFO TOFU

My parents still live there...I was born and raised there !
Now that I think of it...My Mother was born there 81 years ago!
I love Redlands...Many friends and family still there!

472 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:17:11pm

re: #470 UFO TOFU
And yes...Twice a year or more...

473 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:17:33pm

re: #379 LudwigVanQuixote

Zombie, when I first responded to you, I differentiated between the is there a problem question and the what to do about it question. You are the one who keeps bringing politics and economics. I would rather talk just the physics.

Actually, the link summary from Princeton GFDL addresses loss of arable land in the United states. See section 6. It will get us too.

Now if you do not care about poor people in the developing countries having it worse - I can only hope you are joking. They will suffer terribly. I for one do not think that they deserve to die.

You're revealing your political bias here.

You are indeed playing into Al Gore's hyper-accelerated doomsday scenario of millions of poor oppressed brown people starving to death because the hot sun is burning all their tender crops. That's complete hogwash.

The average global temperature, even in the worse-case scenario spun by the doomsayers, is gradually going up decade by decade, century by century, by a few degrees. Arable land on the desert margins will slowly turn to desert over many generations. No individual will be able to notice or perceive any significant change in his or her lifetime. It will be more along the lines of, "Gee, great-grandpa used to be able to grow strawberries here, but now it's too hot for strawberries. We'd better either start planting new kinds of crops, or move to a better plot of land, or take up a different profession." Your scenario envisioning millions of poor people dropping dead from starvation because the evil rich people made the climate so hot that all their crops wilted en masse is completely ridiculous.

Crop patterns may have to change, but that does not lead inevitably to mass death.

And climate change is not to blame for overpopulation. It's hot as hell on many South Pacific islands, and their population has not increased in hundreds of years. It's cold as hell in Scandinavia, and their population is not increasing either. The climate is irrelevant. Population growth or decline has to to with social mores, religion, government policy, etc. -- not climate.

I agree that overpopulation will be a problem in the future, but fiddling with the planet's temperature will not fix that problem.

Economic patterns will shift if the climate heats up, but that does not necessarily mean things will get worse. That's my other main objection to the whole AGW debate. Having science prove there is a slight increase in temperature is not the same thing as proving what the social consequences of that change will be. For all we know, the change will be beneficial, or neutral, or negative in a way we haven't even envisioned. But you can't predict those social effects by uncorking some study about gasses in the atmosphere.

474 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:18:58pm

re: #471 reloadingisnotahobby

My parents still live there...I was born and raised there !


Do you remember when someone deposited a huge boulder in the Redlands Police Dept.'s parking lot with a bumper sticker that said

Make Mentone beautiful; take a rock to Redlands
475 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:20:41pm

re: #472 reloadingisnotahobby
Shoot me an email before you come next time, I'll buy us a round!

476 reloadingisnotahobby  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:22:26pm

re: #474 UFO TOFU
I DO!
I think some where I have a save Mentone bumper sticker!
On the way to the airport I found my very first car sitting in a backyard
Same man I sold it too!
I can see it on Google earth!
Offered him $$$%
No go ...but I"ll hit him up next time I'm out there with CASH!

477 axegrinder  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:28:26pm

Been going back-thread and enjoying the GW debate. Seems the biggest problem is too many people. I have a solution. Mass sterilization. Think of the benefits. No more sobbing babies in restaurants. Public restrooms will smell better. We could phase out public education completely in matter of a generation or so. Am I a genius or what?

///

478 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:29:32pm

re: #473 zombie

Always a voice of reason.

479 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:31:24pm

re: #477 axegrinder

See Margaret Sanger. Not the best source, but a mostly accurate synopsis.

480 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:31:25pm

re: #338 LudwigVanQuixote

It is rather foolish of you to think that your "side" has anything even approaching equivalent credentials. Again, NAS, APS, NASA, NOAA, Princeton GFDL, and the list goes on, and that is only part of the American list. My PhD and the thousands of other PhDs, backed by actual data trump your blog.


Your PhD will not change the facts if you are wrong. Evidence is mounting that you are. Feel free to look it up at your leisure. It is not my blog, perhaps the evidence of that was not clear enough for you.

For the most part yes. I certainly am not receiving a large paycheck from anyone to piss off the oil companies. No one in my physics department is either. For that matter neither is anyone in the APS, NASA or NOAA.


I take it that you are an academic, dependent upon research grants from government agencies. Grants that are likely to dry up if you go against the AGW orthodoxy. The politics of such a position are obvious, yet you claim no bias. You seem to have quite a grudge against the oil companies, does that extend to industry in general? Do you believe that profit is the only motivation that drives them, or do you believe that they are made of people that are trying to make things better for themselves and just might be interested in keeping their home from being despoiled as they make that profit?

You are correct that there are different flavors of skeptics out there. You are not one of the ones who says The climate is always changing to dismiss the issue when you are not making unfounded conspiracy theories.


So now the skeptics are just mostly kooks?

They are not the only source. Please do answer the scientific questions I posed in my post. If you can do that you will debunk everything... take the challenge. Further, they do match reality more than you think look at graph one in the link I keep giving


I did not say 'only source' I said 'primary source'. The computer models are relied upon far too heavily. One of the reasons that the computer models are spitting out near useless projections is that they are trying to solve problems with myriad variables with something little more sophisticated than matrix algebra. Your questions are simply leading questions in pursuit of your strawman argument, loaded with baseless assumptions, and not worthy of answer.

We have over twenty years of study by thousands of professionals. The results are in. What we don't know yet is how fully bad, bad will get. However, there is no doubt that anything looks good.


You really just don't understand the scope of the problem, do you? Twenty years of study by thousands of professionals? That is not even close to what is required, not even if they had today's technology available to them from the start of this effort, and on top of that, it is simply part of one piece of what is needed. We do not have the historical information that is needed. We have somewhat reliable measurements for the last 150 years. We have reliable measurements for about the last 30. Everything before that can only be inferred from imprecise secondary measurements. The results are in? We don't even have a first draft that is worthy of review. We have notes that are scattered about the globe, notes that are often contradictory, notes that are either of vital importance or not worth the paper they are written on, but nothing that even approaches a coherent result. We don't even know if it will get bad. Throughout this thread, comments have pointed to several benefits of a warmer climate that is richer in CO2, yet all you do is demand that they answer your questions and make unsupported assertions.

More study is needed.

481 UFO TOFU  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:38:32pm

re: #480 CyanSnowHawk

Just noticed your blog. Crap, that's another one I'm going to have to follow...

482 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:41:00pm

re: #452 Van Helsing
Methane and water vapor are far greater green house gasses tha CO2. The percentage of CO2 attributed to human activity is miniscule.

False. We have released extra gigatons of CO2 into the atmosphere altering a previous balance. Included in that shifted balance are feedbacks with methane and water vapor - which are even worse GHGs.

2. Ice caps have not been stable for tens of thousands of years.

This is a disingenuous response at best.

That depends on what you mean by stable. Ice that had been around for tens or even hundreds of thousands of years previously is now melting. We did just loose the Wilkins Ice Bridge, shifting currents are causing a cooling of Eastern Antarctica that is unprecedented and the Arctic is the worst we have ever seen it in terms of old ice..


3.
Again, CO2 as a green house is far less efficient than methane or water vapor. For methane, we really don't know what the concentrations were. I'm pretty sure though that the Bison that 'covered the plain to the horizons' were farting.

How droll. We didn't raise Bison in CAFOS and then not treat the sewage. The Siberian bog was not melting then either. Actually we do know a lot about methane concentrations. They keep going up.

Further, the warmer it is from CO2 and Methane, the more water vapor you have.

483 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:45:26pm

re: #482 LudwigVanQuixote

And water vapor makes clouds and clouds increase albedo.

there are also interesting and little understood interactions between the stratospheric clouds and the solar wind .

484 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:54:46pm

re: #473 zombie

You're revealing your political bias here.

Yeah, I'm such a terrible leftist kook for not wanting people to suffer... So if I were a proper right-winger, I wouldn't care if those "millions of brown people" as you put it died?

You are indeed playing into Al Gore's hyper-accelerated doomsday scenario of millions of poor oppressed brown people starving to death because the hot sun is burning all their tender crops. That's complete hogwash.

No I am not. I am playing to the best mathematical modeling we have. Since I actually understand the math that goes into the models, and I understand their limitations, I feel qualified to make the statements I have been making.

The average global temperature, even in the worse-case scenario spun by the doomsayers, is gradually going up decade by decade, century by century, by a few degrees.

Ask a farmer how a few degrees of temperature change and a little more or less rainfall can affect crops. This is not so small a deal as you think. Not by a long shot. We are already seeing altered germination and growing patterns today. Also, this is a few degrees on average over the globe, inotherwords, places where is did not go up by much are offset by places where it went up by a lot.

Arable land on the desert margins will slowly turn to desert over many generations. No individual will be able to notice or perceive any significant change in his or her lifetime.

This is just false. We are seeing the effects now.

It will be more along the lines of, "Gee, great-grandpa used to be able to grow strawberries here, but now it's too hot for strawberries. We'd better either start planting new kinds of crops, or move to a better plot of land, or take up a different profession." Your scenario envisioning millions of poor people dropping dead from starvation because the evil rich people made the climate so hot that all their crops wilted en masse is completely ridiculous.

Again will you look at section six of the links from Princeton I posted. That is the UNITED STATES!


Crop patterns may have to change, but that does not lead inevitably to mass death.

I does if the net effect is less crops across the globe.

And climate change is not to blame for overpopulation. It's hot as hell on many South Pacific islands, and their population has not increased in hundreds of years. It's cold as hell in Scandinavia, and their population is not increasing either. The climate is irrelevant. Population growth or decline has to to with social mores, religion, government policy, etc. -- not climate.

That's true. People have sex when it is hot too. However, all of those babies need to get food from somewhere. The population argument was based on current growth trends due to other interactions between men and women. The argument is that the population is growing and the food supply will be shrinking.

I agree that overpopulation will be a problem in the future, but fiddling with the planet's temperature will not fix that problem.

See above.

Economic patterns will shift if the climate heats up, but that does not necessarily mean things will get worse.

The science disagrees with you.

That's my other main objection to the whole AGW debate. Having science prove there is a slight increase in temperature...

You really have no idea what a few degrees means over a whole planet. This is a very big deal. Ecosystems exist in balances that are a lot more delicate than you give credit for.

... is not the same thing as proving what the social consequences of that change will be.

You are right it is possible that for the first time in human history, hungry desperate people will not turn to violence.

485 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:58:02pm

re: #481 UFO TOFU

Just noticed your blog. Crap, that's another one I'm going to have to follow...

Thanks. I don't get to put as much time into it as I'd like, but throwing out my impressions of Atlas Shrugged as I read it for the first time has been fun.

486 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:00:39pm

re: #483 Van Helsing

And water vapor makes clouds and clouds increase albedo.

So before you were arguing that water vapor was a bigger deal than CO2 so we did not need to look at CO2 as a GHG, now you are arguing that water vapor is a plus for warming problems because of more clouds? How do clouds form? Will there be more or less in a hotter environment? Will there be more fog at low levels perhaps that would actually make for sweltering humid days?


there are also interesting and little understood interactions between the stratospheric clouds and the solar wind .

Solar wind ... so how precisely, by what mechanism will a high energy charged particle form a nucleator for rain drops? The buzz word you want to look for by the way is a cloud chamber. Do the conditions of a cloud chamber obtain in the stratosphere? Short form no...

That is a load of hooey from the get go.

487 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:04:29pm

re: #484 LudwigVanQuixote

You know, Charles has provided these handy little links on the top of each comment in order to either reply or quote. It makes it so much easier to read if you would use those buttons so that the quoted post is distinguished by more than just italics.

And claims of disingenuity from someone that started from the premise that all skeptics were either kooks or part of a vast conspiracy orchestrated by the oil companies is pretty rich.

488 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:06:38pm

re: #480 CyanSnowHawk

OK, so on the one hand you basically wish to argue that because I am an academic, whose job it is to look into these things, I am on the take for more grant money and so are all of my colleagues... Aside from being fabulously insulting, I do not cook my research fuck you very much and neither does anyone I know, fuck you very much, it is stupid.

Do you really think that with the last eight years, anyone in this nation was doing their federal grants any favors given the last congress or the last administration who wanted more than anything to make the science on this go away? That is just stupid.

As to more research needed, Yes you are right we really need to do tons more research. We have no idea how bad bad will be. It is like predicting hurricanes. We know that the hurricane will be bad, but not how bad. We do need to know more. But also, there is no such thing as a happy hurricane. We do not need to know the science any better to say that.

Further, from your comments, I assume that you are not an academic. So that makes you qualified to tell us the state of our research how?

Ohhh and fuck you very much.

489 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:09:07pm

re: #487 CyanSnowHawk


And claims of disingenuity from someone that started from the premise that all skeptics were either kooks or part of a vast conspiracy orchestrated by the oil companies is pretty rich.

I never said that. That is you projecting.

490 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:18:00pm

re: #429 UberInfidel67

So what? It has been a bone of contention here in America when people refer to themselves as such. Don't we all agree that we are just Americans? Looks like the same thing to me. Perhaps you just do not care for the messenger?

You think the BNP are disputing those terms on that basis, that they are advocating a colour blind, 'post racial' society? You don't know much about the BNP do you?

Get a clue.

491 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:20:18pm

re: #429 UberInfidel67

I note also that you were so incensed by my comment that you felt it necessary to upding mich-again's ill-judged dig at the condition of British teeth. Classy!

492 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:25:45pm

re: #486 LudwigVanQuixote

Solar wind ... so how precisely, by what mechanism will a high energy charged particle form a nucleator for rain drops? The buzz word you want to look for by the way is a cloud chamber. Do the conditions of a cloud chamber obtain in the stratosphere? Short form no...

Various proposals have been made for the mechanism by which cosmic rays might affect clouds, including ion mediated nucleation, and indirect effects on current flow density in the global electric circuit (see Tinsley 2000, and F. Yu 1999). Other studies refer to the formation of relatively highly charged aerosols and cloud droplets at cloud boundaries, with an indirect effect on ice particle formation and altering aerosol interaction with cloud droplets.

See Henrik Svensmark 2006.

493 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:28:57pm

re: #492 CyanSnowHawk

'No Sun link' to climate change

[Link: news.bbc.co.uk...]

The research contradicts a favoured theory of climate "sceptics", that changes in cosmic rays coming to Earth determine cloudiness and temperature.

The idea is that variations in solar activity affect cosmic ray intensity.

But UK scientists found there has been no significant link between cosmic rays and cloudiness in the last 20 years.

Presenting their findings in the Institute of Physics journal, Environmental Research Letters, the University of Lancaster team explain that they used three different ways to search for a correlation, and found virtually none.

494 UberInfidel67  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:30:53pm

re: #491 Jimmah So what...it was a joke about the Brits and their teeth. Lighten up. And yeah, we bitch constantly about "there are no African Americans" and blah blah blah. I know what I took from that statement. So now I am a neonazi fascist too? Oh please.

495 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:38:02pm

re: #484 LudwigVanQuixote

The argument is that the population is growing and the food supply will be shrinking.
...
You are right it is possible that for the first time in human history, hungry desperate people will not turn to violence.

You're basically quoting the one part of Thomas Malthus' essay An Essay on the Principle of Population that has been proven over and over to be flat-out wrong.

Malthus showed that population rates have the capacity to grow faster than food-production rates, and as a result, he predicted that there will inevitably be mass starvation, and social upheaval, and in the end massive loss of human life.

But, as right as Malthus was about various other principles, his predictions turned out to be completely off-base. The massive die-offs he predicted never happened, neither during his lifetime, nor in the intervening 200 years.

Incredible advances in crop and food technology have outpaced population growth. And the advances keep coming, year after year, at an accelerating pace -- while the population explosion has begun to slow a bit. There is no evidence whatsoever that a lack of food worldwide is going to cause mass starvation -- nor the social upheaval you propose.

What causes mass starvation is bad government policies, and international conflict. There is more than enough food being grown right now to feed double the population we have. The only reason people go hungry is because of fucked up governments, fucked up social systems, and fucked up bad people -- like Hamas and Somali pirates stealing the food aid going to the needy. Without bad people and governments, everyone on earth would be well-fed.

Nothing you have shown, beyond anecdotal evidence and emotional argument, proves that climate change will degrade the planet's ability to produce crops overall. Showing that specific portions of one country might see problems proves nothing. Other areas migth see improvements. Other countries might see improvements. And meanwhile, the food technologies get better and better.

At this stage you're just being a Malthusian Chicken Little, running around saying the sky is falling.

496 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:43:07pm

re: #494 UberInfidel67

I don't need to lighten up mate. I'm all for having a laugh about the British teeth in an appropriate context, I'm not impressed by trivialising an important point about the evils of racism with a comment like that. Your updinging that post says that you are.

So now I am a neonazi fascist too? Oh please.

Did I say that? No. I said that you wrongly assumed an innocent intention on the part of the BNP in making that statement. You ever heard a post-racial advocate describe the use of the term 'black Americans' as "bloodless genocide"?

497 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:52:27pm

re: #495 zombie

Zombie, you are looking at absolutely none of the info from the Princeton models which actually do follow observed trends. I am not making a chicken little argument. Will you please just look at what I linked?

How many times do I need to post it?

You are also looking at it from the perspective of America which has the strongest bread basket in the whole world right now. If you please just look at the science from Princeton you will see that the US WILL BE AFFECTED TOO.

Now as to Malthus, the only reason he was wrong was because we did make such advances in food production. For you to be correct you are banking that with diminished resources and even more increased population, we can keep production ahead of the curve from miracle agriculture that has not yet been developed. That is a very dangerous gamble.

So I do suppose that in this way I am being Malthusian - only I don't want that to happen.

As to chicken little, I am saying that things look really really bad by around 2100, while there are things that we can do about it now that will not destroy our economy and will not destroy our way of life. That is hardly a chicken little argument.

Further, chicken little was not correct. The scientific community is.

And if we want to talk old school philosophers, I'll make a variation on Pascal's wager.

If we (the whole damned legitimate scientific community from around the world, with very few exceptions) are right, and we take appropriate actions, then we will have averted or at least mitigated catastrophe, saved lives, eliminated our dependance on the Middle East and Venezuela,, created thousands of jobs in the US and kept Billions of out dollars from leaving the country every year while producing less pollution and boosting the health living conditions of Americans everywhere, less smog, less haze etc...

If we are wrong, and AGW is not that bad, and we take the same actions then we will have eliminated our dependance on the Middle East and Venezuela,, created thousands of jobs in the US and kept Billions of out dollars from leaving the country every year while producing less pollution and boosting the health living conditions of Americans everywhere, less smog, less haze etc...

But we are not wrong.

498 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:54:15pm

re: #495 zombie

Incredible advances in crop and food technology have outpaced population growth. And the advances keep coming, year after year, at an accelerating pace -- while the population explosion has begun to slow a bit. There is no evidence whatsoever that a lack of food worldwide is going to cause mass starvation -- nor the social upheaval you propose.

Sorry zombie, but it is insane, and I think, massively irresponsible, to promote the idea that innovation can feed an indefinitely exploding population. With human innovation, you can certainly do better than beetles in a jar of flour in extending the lifetime of an expansionary phase, but it's sheer mysticism to argue from that that Malthus was wrong in the fundamentals of his work, and that the human population can go on expanding without ever running out of what it needs. Just because we haven't crashed into the wall yet doesn't mean there is no wall. While we are stuck here on this planet here have to be limits even to human growth.

From what I've read, the best way to 'limit' human population growth is through a process of raising the standard of living and education/aspiration (especially of the female part of the population) in countries which are undergoing rapid population growth.

499 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:56:37pm

re: #495 zombie

Also, unlike Malthus, I am saying things like build nuclear plants and electric vehicles, stop buying Chinese goods until they are more green etc...

I am not saying that people need mandatory birth control.

500 zombie  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:59:14pm

re: #497 LudwigVanQuixote

But your argument is based on the AGW advocates implementing your proposal of many many nuke plants powering our economy.

Except that isn't going to happen. There will be no nuke plants, and the global warming "solution" is to destroy the capitalist economic system. (Which was the whole intention from the beginning.)

There is a third option to your Pascal's wager, which is more likely:

The proposals to "solve" AGW will intentionally target and cripple the economies of Europe and the US, and reward third-world nations, and when Europe and the US fall, their tradition of liberal democracy will fall with them, and the world will descend into third-world-esque totalitarianism because screwed up countries will became economically and politically ascendent on the globe. So we'll end up living on a nice cool planet ruled by dictators and thugs.

501 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:59:33pm

re: #493 Jimmah

'No Sun link' to climate change

[Link: news.bbc.co.uk...]

You beat me to it. Thanks Jimmah!

502 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:01:30pm

re: #488 LudwigVanQuixote

OK, so on the one hand you basically wish to argue that because I am an academic, whose job it is to look into these things, I am on the take for more grant money and so are all of my colleagues... Aside from being fabulously insulting, I do not cook my research fuck you very much and neither does anyone I know, fuck you very much, it is stupid.

Do you really think that with the last eight years, anyone in this nation was doing their federal grants any favors given the last congress or the last administration who wanted more than anything to make the science on this go away? That is just stupid.

As to more research needed, Yes you are right we really need to do tons more research. We have no idea how bad bad will be. It is like predicting hurricanes. We know that the hurricane will be bad, but not how bad. We do need to know more. But also, there is no such thing as a happy hurricane. We do not need to know the science any better to say that.

Further, from your comments, I assume that you are not an academic. So that makes you qualified to tell us the state of our research how?

Ohhh and fuck you very much.

You find that claims of bias leveled against a researcher simply because of their source of funding is insulting. I see we understand each other on that point. May I suggest that you have a gander in a mirror.

You think that the last eight years demonstrates that there is no possible way that government backed research can possibly be biased. Yet, you previously made a point of saying how thousands of researchers have been studying the problem for more than 20 years. Which is it then? Does the government pull your strings, or are your research dollars more under the control of the well known left bias of academia?

You still work from the weak assumption that the effect on climate will be bad. OMG IT'S A FUCKING EMERGENCY. This is an alarmist assumption that is not well supported, but as long as you, and others like you, can maintain that there is a dire and immediate threat, you can squeeze out more money for your research. See how that works, you point out the conflict of interest in industry research, and I point out the very same conflict in your research. Every single argument that you make against industry research applies in a like manner to your own. Think about that while in that ivory tower.

You have no idea of my qualifications to judge your research, as I don't go around trumpeting my credentials when I want to impress the riff-raff. Nor am I inclined to tell you at this point, as I think you would believe mine as much as I believe yours.

503 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:02:36pm

re: #501 LudwigVanQuixote

No sweat!

504 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:03:07pm

re: #500 zombie

Or, if the scientific community is correct, and we listen to your worst fears - (I strongly believe that America will go nuclear before it goes commie and that we will deploy more electric vehicles first - really ) or, if we are correct, we will be living in a very hot world with famine, plague, disease and war on an unprecedented scale that will lead less to commie thugs and more to the ones like in Mad Max.

505 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:11:43pm

re: #502 CyanSnowHawk

Really, you don't want to impress the riff raff by talking about your credentials...and you happily discount the whole scientific community as frauds. So when you sort of believed my credentials, you all but accused me of falsifying my science because I was on the take, and now I suppose that you assume I don't have them OK... If you had any credentials at all you would know that there is no graver insult that you can level at a scientist than cooking his or her data. No ones does that without having iron clad evidence. People who falsified their data have their careers ended. But you didn't just assume that about me, you assumed that about everyone.

You don't have any credentials. Some here might be fooled by your grandstanding, but no one with credentials would say what you have said. If you had them, you might make an actual technical argument. You know the best way to check that is to ask technical questions... Like what is the micro-cannonical ensemble anyway? But ones more related to a topic you know nothing of.

You are nothing more than a crank. You are a fraud. I am calling you out as one. I am calling you a liar.

At best, you are just like people with fake degrees. At worst, you are just like their little creationist hacks only your religion is hating Al Gore and you seem him Satan like in any argument about actual science.

Where was I...

506 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:31:10pm

re: #502 CyanSnowHawk

And where did I say that industry researchers were all garbage? Where did I say that? No, real scientists, do not level the boom of calling fraud lightly.

About the best you can say about that from me is that there are certain industry funded "think tanks" much like the Tabacco Institute. Or the Discovery institute. For certain, it is mostly those guys making noise in the MSM that there is no AGW.

So let's check your credentials, you don't need to tell me, just answer some questions that anyone qualified to technically discuss AGW would know like the back of their hand...

1. What is entropy in terms if the canonical ensemble?

2. What is the Runge Cutta method?

3.How many cells are there in a typical turbulence model and what is Landaus relation to the number of free parameters in such a model to the Reynolds Number?

Those are first year grad questions...

Now some real ones:

1. What do Lyaponov exponents have to do with modeling?

507 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:32:58pm

re: #502 CyanSnowHawk

And further you fraudulent dick, when you can't answer those, because you won't be able to just wiki them to get them right, I will have not only called you out but proven you out.

508 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:45:37pm

re: #500 zombie

Or a fourth, we grudgingly do too little too late and reap the whirlwind.

509 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:47:24pm

re: #505 LudwigVanQuixote

Really, you don't want to impress the riff raff by talking about your credentials...and you happily discount the whole scientific community as frauds. So when you sort of believed my credentials, you all but accused me of falsifying my science because I was on the take, and now I suppose that you assume I don't have them OK... If you had any credentials at all you would know that there is no graver insult that you can level at a scientist than cooking his or her data. No ones does that without having iron clad evidence. People who falsified their data have their careers ended. But you didn't just assume that about me, you assumed that about everyone.

You really don't want to believe that you could be wrong, do you? Your attack is full of assumptions that you cannot back up. You do not even seem to understand what it was that I said. I say that all the accusations you make against industry researchers can be applied to you and you assume that I have accused you of "cooking your books" and "falsifying your data". Did you miss the option that I could be saying that the industry researchers might maintain the same level of integrity in their research that you do? You didn't even consider that, did you? Your assumptions about the researchers in industry are so ingrained that you cannot for a moment consider them to not be doing the things that you thought I accused you of.

You don't have any credentials. Some here might be fooled by your grandstanding, but no one with credentials would say what you have said. If you had them, you might make an actual technical argument. You know the best way to check that is to ask technical questions... Like what is the micro-cannonical ensemble anyway? But ones more related to a topic you know nothing of.

Give me a chance, I'll say plenty more that you don't like. It won't mean to you the same thing that it means to me of course, you will assume it to be a grave insult that I wouldn't possibly commit if I were the person you thought I was. The micro-cannonical ensemble - I'm thinking it has something to do with chamber music and small artillery pieces. Have they won any Grammys yet?

You are nothing more than a crank. You are a fraud. I am calling you out as one. I am calling you a liar.

Perhaps you could point out these supposed lies. Not to worry, I've got Nomex boxers. Also, right back at ya'. "and you happily discount the whole scientific community as frauds." Liar.

At best, you are just like people with fake degrees. At worst, you are just like their little creationist hacks only your religion is hating Al Gore and you seem him Satan like in any argument about actual science.

Do you get much exercise jumping to conclusions like this? How's the blood pressure?

Where was I...

I believe you were defending the untenable position that we know enough to reach conclusions about global climate that justify placing enough restrictions on our economy to turn the US into a third world nation in roughly 50 years.

510 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:52:30pm

re: #486 LudwigVanQuixote

I'm missing the refutation here.
It's late. I drink. I still don't see where you've refuted the basic idea of a self-correcting system.

511 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:54:53pm

re: #506 LudwigVanQuixote

Yup. Attack the credentials. That's what EVERYBODY does.

No longer even worth responding to.

512 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:57:50pm

re: #509 CyanSnowHawk

And with that, mister hawk, you missed the part where I said I would never discount any researcher just for being in industry. I do however discount people from the Fraser Institute or the Discovery institute when I see their garbage masquerading as "science." I also worry about releases from the petroleum institute also. Non of these are non-biased institutions that have any accreditation.

Now as to you,

Please explain to the riff raff here why you are qualified to pontificate as you have and claim status that you do not.

Your "witticism" about the micro canonical ensemble, something that undergraduates in good physics departments know about says all that I need to hear. But perhaps you are a physical chemist, then you wold have taken stat mech in grad school. So you should still know it. If you were some sort of engineer who deals with fluids you would have had to have it in grad school too.
Meteorological researchers need to know stat mech as well.

What might be the relation of Statistical Mechanics to problems of fluids and currents?

So, you are certainly not from any field that would know about this. IN fact, you know shit and shinola about this, yet you feel the need to maintain humility for the riff raff... Ummm Hummm... Yes, I do know without a doubt that you have no particular expertise in this field. None - Zilch - NADA.

Perhaps you are a computer programmer or an electrical engineer. Not to denigrate those fields at all - they are great fields - but they have as much bearing on the topics at hand as appendectomies do on cabinet making.

So then I repeat the question: Where the fuck do you get off claiming you know shit about the science when you don't, and as someone who obviously was never in the research community, where the fuck do you get off calling us frauds.

513 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:58:31pm

re: #511 Van Helsing

Yup. Attack the credentials. That's what EVERYBODY does.

No longer even worth responding to.

I will say that it took quite a while to get there. I suppose you are right though. Time to put on the GAZE filter for Mr. Q.

514 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 5:59:24pm

re: #511 Van Helsing

Yup. Attack the credentials. That's what EVERYBODY does.

No longer even worth responding to.

You were clearly drinking, read up in the thread more. He decided that the whole scientific community including me was posting fraudulent data. I do not take that well. Nor should any scientist.

As to his credentials, if you read a little further you will see that he has none relevant to this discussion.

515 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:00:44pm

re: #509 CyanSnowHawk

You didn't answer Ludwig's questions. You lose.

1. What is entropy in terms if the canonical ensemble?

2. What is the Runge Cutta method?

3.How many cells are there in a typical turbulence model and what is Landaus relation to the number of free parameters in such a model to the Reynolds Number?

516 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:02:14pm

re: #513 CyanSnowHawk

I will say that it took quite a while to get there. I suppose you are right though. Time to put on the GAZE filter for Mr. Q.

And with that you know you were called out. Coward.

Again, some here will be fooled. Those lizards who know some science, will know that you could have redeemed yourself at anytime, but you even shirked low ball mellon questions.

I know you are a fraud.

I know you lied about your "degrees." Whatever they are they have nothing to do with this.

I know.

517 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:03:20pm

re: #515 Jimmah

You didn't answer Ludwig's questions. You lose.

Thanks buddy! He does. Honestly from the second he started calling me a some sort of a bribed government data cooker along with the rest of the community, it was really clear that he's just a fraud.

518 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:03:22pm

re: #512 LudwigVanQuixote

where the fuck do you get off calling us frauds.

Ah just one more before I leave the office.

Perhaps because you have given me cause to think so.

519 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:03:56pm

re: #511 Van Helsing

Yup. Attack the credentials. That's what EVERYBODY does.

No longer even worth responding to.

No. Cyan claimed credentials and couldn't back them up when asked. Risky business, claiming credentials you don't have.

520 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:05:51pm

re: #518 CyanSnowHawk

Actually they are short answers to the questions. You could type them quickly if you know them and I would apologize.

521 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:07:15pm

re: #518 CyanSnowHawk

Ah just one more before I leave the office.

Perhaps because you have given me cause to think so.

Even just one of them... How about the third... it is a simple algebraic relation.

You could surely do that before you left the office?

522 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:08:11pm

re: #519 Jimmah

No. Cyan claimed credentials and couldn't back them up when asked. Risky business, claiming credentials you don't have.

Look again, I made absolutely no claim of any credential. Do you see any comment in this thread where I made such a claim?

523 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:09:40pm

re: #522 CyanSnowHawk

Look again, I made absolutely no claim of any credential. Do you see any comment in this thread where I made such a claim?

Um..yes.

You have no idea of my qualifications to judge your research, as I don't go around trumpeting my credentials when I want to impress the riff-raff. Nor am I inclined to tell you at this point, as I think you would believe mine as much as I believe yours.

524 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:14:39pm

re: #523 Jimmah

Nor am I inclined to tell you at this point, as I think you would believe mine as much as I believe yours.

And this means what? I did not lay claim to any credential whatsoever. I doubt that LvQ would believe I have a high school diploma if I said so.

525 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:17:01pm
526 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:18:08pm

re: #522 CyanSnowHawk

Look again, I made absolutely no claim of any credential. Do you see any comment in this thread where I made such a claim?

Yes. Didn't see a claim myself. I sure as hell don't have any.
What I have is anecdotal evidence of Greenland being warmer, of ice closing the Thames and such other silly little things.

The climate changes. Human activities likely have little to do with it.
I agree with the Quixote - more nuke plants. Start now. Go fast.
Our current electrical grid is demand driven. Changin it to supply driven will be ugly at best.

527 Van Helsing  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:20:22pm

re: #525 Iron Fist

Interesting.

For youIron Hand
I used to have a collection of their 'war songs' iron hand, mans's too strong, ride across the river...

528 [deleted]  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:26:36pm
529 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:26:47pm

Answers to my own questions:

1. Entropy in the canonical ensemble is given by:

k ln (omega)...

Would not have taken long to type really...

2. The Runge Cutta method is a numerical and iterative technique for solving differential equations on computers. Without an equation editor, I would have accepted just that.

3. Landau, the great Russian physicist predicted that the number of grids needed to model a turbulent flow went exponentially with the Reynold's number.

530 Jimmah  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:29:16pm

re: #524 CyanSnowHawk

You clearly implied that you did have relevant qualifications, and just weren't saying, citing the reason as Ludwigs predicted non-acceptance of them:

You have no idea of my qualifications to judge your research, as I don't go around trumpeting my credentials when I want to impress the riff-raff. Nor am I inclined to tell you at this point, as I think you would believe mine as much as I believe yours

531 LudwigVanQuixote  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 6:33:01pm

re: #530 Jimmah

He also accused me and everyone I know of cooking our books. That is what really pissed me off.

532 CyanSnowHawk  Thu, Apr 23, 2009 8:18:59pm

re: #530 Jimmah

You clearly implied that you did have relevant qualifications, and just weren't saying, citing the reason as Ludwigs predicted non-acceptance of them:

I am not responsible for your assumptions. I made no such claim, nor do I feel compelled to prove myself to an agitator that is begging me to engage his strawman.

533 LudwigVanQuixote  Fri, Apr 24, 2009 12:10:32am

re: #498 Jimmah

Sorry zombie, but it is insane, and I think, massively irresponsible, to promote the idea that innovation can feed an indefinitely exploding population. With human innovation, you can certainly do better than beetles in a jar of flour in extending the lifetime of an expansionary phase, but it's sheer mysticism to argue from that that Malthus was wrong in the fundamentals of his work, and that the human population can go on expanding without ever running out of what it needs. Just because we haven't crashed into the wall yet doesn't mean there is no wall. While we are stuck here on this planet here have to be limits even to human growth.

From what I've read, the best way to 'limit' human population growth is through a process of raising the standard of living and education/aspiration (especially of the female part of the population) in countries which are undergoing rapid population growth.

That is awesome. I am sorry I missed it earlier.

534 Jimmah  Fri, Apr 24, 2009 7:30:32am

re: #532 CyanSnowHawk

You have no idea of my qualifications to judge your research, as I don't go around trumpeting my credentials when I want to impress the riff-raff. Nor am I inclined to tell you at this point, as I think you would believe mine as much as I believe yours

Your implications - that you have relevant qualifications and credentials, but are witholding them because you think they won't be believed. Not my assumptions.

You should withdraw and think on the value of conducting debates in a more honest way in future.

535 Jimmah  Fri, Apr 24, 2009 7:31:30am

re: #533 LudwigVanQuixote

Thanks.

536 CyanSnowHawk  Fri, Apr 24, 2009 10:46:31am

re: #534 Jimmah

Your implications - that you have relevant qualifications and credentials, but are witholding them because you think they won't be believed. Not my assumptions.

You should withdraw and think on the value of conducting debates in a more honest way in future.

You assume. Read the text that you quoted, I made no such claim. The debate ended when the Doctor's first response was to call me a fool in the first sentence and start strutting around with a sheepskin (re: #338 LudwigVanQuixote), after that, it was nothing but troll baiting.

537 Jimmah  Fri, Apr 24, 2009 1:54:48pm

re: #536 CyanSnowHawk

You can't stop lying can you?


You have no idea of my qualifications to judge your research, as I don't go around trumpeting my credentials when I want to impress the riff-raff. Nor am I inclined to tell you at this point, as I think you would believe mine as much as I believe yours

Sure, you were not trying in any way to give the impression that you had relevant qualifications and credentials that you were holding back. No, this was your way of saying "Your suspicions are correct Ludwig. No really, I don't have any qualifications or credentials whatsover that are relevant to this debate or that would help me to judge your research."

Absolutely pathetic!


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Account Settings Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Crawling out of everywhere.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

researchok
California's Demographic Revolution
3 hours, 13 minutes ago
Views: 58 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

researchok
The Folly of Internet Freedom: The Mistake of Talking About the Internet as a Human Right
3 hours, 15 minutes ago
Views: 46 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

researchok
Supreme Makeover
3 hours, 18 minutes ago
Views: 43 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

researchok
A Pattern Emerges
3 hours, 19 minutes ago
Views: 45 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

researchok
Thai Police Charge 2 Over Bangkok Blasts as Iran Denies Involvement
3 hours, 23 minutes ago
Views: 52 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

researchok
Putin Won't Go Quietly - if at All
3 hours, 25 minutes ago
Views: 64 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

researchok
12 Countries at Risk of New Economic Crises
3 hours, 26 minutes ago
Views: 49 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

researchok
China Tells Clinton Syria Crisis Internal Matter
3 hours, 26 minutes ago
Views: 46 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 2

researchok
Wave of Downgrades: Moody's Delivers Damning Verdict on Euro Zone
3 hours, 27 minutes ago
Views: 38 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

researchok
Happy Hour for Assad: The World Community Must Act on Syria
3 hours, 27 minutes ago
Views: 46 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2

 Frank says:

I knew Jimi (Hendrix) and I think that the best thing you could say about Jimi was: there was a person who shouldn't use drugs. -- From the second of two FZ interviews which were transcribed from an imported CD called "The Frank Zappa Interview Picture Disk". Conducted sometime in early to mid 1984.