Video: Randall Terry Tells Anti-Abortion Extremists Not to Back Down

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Video • Mon Jun 1, 2009 at 6:14 pm PDT • Views: 397

Here’s Randall Terry, founder of the extreme anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, with a deplorable statement on the murder of Dr. George Tiller that may make you nauseous.

Quote: “He reaped what he sowed.”

This is domestic terrorism, in your face. It’s the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

Advertisement

706 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:15:58pm

He's not really a Christian.
/

2 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:16:43pm

sew this mfr

3 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:16:54pm

re: #1 Walter L. Newton

I'm not sure about his humanity, either.

4 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:17:19pm

re: #1 Walter L. Newton

He's not really a Christian.
/

He is really an asshole.
But thats just MHO.

5 zombie  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:17:28pm

He's employing the "No True Deranged Religious Psychopath" fallacy.

6 Shiplord Kirel  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:18:00pm

Bastard. Not just a world-class hypocrite but a violence inciting demogogue and profiteer of lunacy as well.

7 Kragar  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:18:18pm

Put him in a keffiyeh, throw in some Koran quotes and he could get a gig on any Middle East network.

8 freetoken  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:18:24pm

That phrase, "he reaped what he sowed" is showing up all over the right-o-sphere. It is a popular sentiment.

9 Charles Johnson  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:18:38pm

I didn't watch -- did Bill O'Reilly have anything to say about the murder on his show?

10 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:18:42pm

"We must not surrender our dead babies"
Yeesh.

11 Last Mohican  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:18:44pm

Funny, I was just wishing I could get nauseous!

Thanks Mr. Terry.

12 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:18:52pm

re: #1 Walter L. Newton

He's not really a Christian.
/

He has lots of statues of angels behind him. Oh, please.

13 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:19:09pm

re: #9 Charles

I didn't watch -- did Bill O'Reilly have anything to say about the murder on his show?

Just a note, the first two hours of Rush didn't.

14 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:19:19pm

Words fail me.

15 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:20:18pm

Now, I know my history could be a bit dodgy and all, but I don't remember the Suffrage movement killing their opponents or showing gruesome images. Any help?

16 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:20:28pm

re: #14 Sharmuta

Words fail me.

The words on the signs repulse me.

17 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:20:39pm

re: #9 Charles

I didn't watch -- did Bill O'Reilly have anything to say about the murder on his show?

Yes. I missed the first part. He had two talking heads on later who both disapproved of the murder. O'Reilly mentioned that he had hoped that legal action would end his medical practise.

18 zombie  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:21:14pm

re: #9 Charles

I didn't watch -- did Bill O'Reilly have anything to say about the murder on his show?

The leftist media went into hysterics over the Tiller murder. And will ignore the recruitment center murders as best they can.

The (remaining) right-wing media will downplay the Tiller murder and focus on the recruitment center murders as much as possible.

And the sun will rise in the east tomorrow morning.

19 Shiplord Kirel  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:21:24pm

"and, yes, at their churches."

Direct, unambiguous, open incitement.

20 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:21:26pm

ho boy...the loons are coming out of the wood work on all sides

21 Idle Drifter  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:22:20pm

re: #4 DEZes

He is really an asshole.
But thats just MHO.

He broke the needle on the Asshole Meter.

22 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:22:26pm

is repeated head butting considered violent?...
anyway by his own twisted reasoning he, himself could become a target...murder becomes a sympathetic tool for the righteous...this guy is a bonafide crackpot

23 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:22:28pm

re: #16 DEZes

I had to stop at the "peaceful people" part. Not sure what part of murder in a house of worship is peaceful, but... that's where I stopped.

24 Charles Johnson  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:22:44pm

re: #19 Shiplord Kirel

"and, yes, at their churches."

Direct, unambiguous, open incitement.

Absolutely. And he says that right after Dr. Tiller was murdered at his church.

25 Kragar  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:22:57pm

"Maybe it should be the authorities who let him kill babies."

Displacement much?

26 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:23:04pm

re: #21 Idle Drifter

He broke the needle on the Asshole Meter.

I stand corrected.

27 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:23:38pm

This guy would fit right in a "demonstration" in NYC with a disgusting sign ... he has the ugly eye-gleam going.

28 zombie  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:23:45pm

re: #20 Jewels (AKA Julian)

ho boy...the loons are coming out of the wood work on all sides

"The walls are alive, with the sound of new-sick."

29 Dahveed  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:24:17pm

All I can say is that Randall Terry is a disgusting human being.

30 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:24:53pm

Any politician who still supports Terry is going to get trashed.

Kobach lost his last election bid, Kline lost his bid.

31 Charles Johnson  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:25:04pm

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

32 jim in virginia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:25:04pm

Terry is pond scum.

33 sattv4u2  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:25:07pm

re: #29 Dahveed

All I can say is that Randall Terry is a disgusting human being.

the rest was just superfulous!

34 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:25:12pm

re: #23 Sharmuta

I had to stop at the "peaceful people" part. Not sure what part of murder in a house of worship is peaceful, but... that's where I stopped.

You just missed a very disturbed rant, the man is ill.

35 Shiplord Kirel  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:25:35pm

Fortunately for Terry, even the fanatics haven't yet launched a jihad against adulterous husbands...

36 mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:25:38pm

So now we have Christians issuing fatwas and calling for their version of sharia law.

37 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:26:12pm

re: #36 mich-again

So now we have Christians issuing fatwas and calling for their version of sharia law.

That about sums it up.

38 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:26:24pm

re: #31 Charles

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

This could be aunty aziz or Fazlullah talking. Rhetoric, ACTIONS, images...

39 ladycatnip  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:26:28pm

This man is a megalomaniac - sick and twisted, and full of his own self-importance. I tuned out right after "This is a teaching moment."

40 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:26:29pm

re: #32 jim in virginia

Terry is pond scum.

No, pond scum floats at the top. I was thinking more benthonic...

Word?

41 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:26:36pm

re: #36 mich-again

So now we have Christians issuing fatwas and calling for their version of sharia law.

He's not a Christian.

42 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:26:51pm

RICO anyone?

43 Last Mohican  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:27:23pm

re: #41 Walter L. Newton

He's not a Christian.

You mean he's not a true Christian.

44 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:27:25pm

we will kill, if and when the Scripture provides for our path...

45 Honcho  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:27:58pm

As for me, I'm not so much "pro-choice" as what you might call "anti-life"-- as Heinlein said, parenting in a mass culture without the restraints of traditional societies should require a license. And the Roman notion, that fillicide is not murder, rather retroactive birth control, deserves a second look by the Vulcan Science Council.

46 Ojoe  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:28:15pm

God is love

47 Charles Johnson  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:28:32pm

Randall Terry on the Sean Hannity show:

48 Shiplord Kirel  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:28:44pm

He's gone Phelper on us, except that Phelps is much much careful about incitng violence.
Btw, did y'all notice that the Phelps cult showed up at the candle-light vigil for Dr. Tiller last night.

49 Sharmuta  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:28:51pm

re: #36 mich-again

So now we have Christians issuing fatwas and calling for their version of sharia law.

They're in bed with islamic creationists concerning science and intelligent design already.

50 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:29:09pm

Sure Terry, Dr. Tiller reap what he sowed. Just where does it say it's up to men to do the reaping?

I'm quite content to keep the debate civil, pray for what I believe, and leave the final reaping up to God.

What you are saying Terry is a worker of lawlessness is doing God's work, and nothing could be farther from the truth.

51 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:29:16pm

we are the True Agents of Gods Will...we will not hesitate to Smite Satan wherever he is to be found...

52 KingKenrod  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:29:19pm

O'Reilly spent quite a bit time talking about lefty blogs that were trying to blame him for inciting Tiller's murderer. He mentioned Mary Mapes, Dailykos, HP.

53 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:29:21pm

re: #28 zombie

As a thought, you think all the people coming unhinged is due to Obama's mishandling of foreign policy. I've not seeing things this screwy since the 80's at the height of the Cold war

54 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:29:37pm
55 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:29:49pm

re: #47 Charles

Randall Terry on the Sean Hannity show:


[Video]

You are truly merciless. ;)
No more, ah hell I have to click.

56 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:30:03pm

re: #48 Shiplord Kirel

He's gone Phelper on us, except that Phelps is much much careful about incitng violence.
Btw, did y'all notice that the Phelps cult showed up at the candle-light vigil for Dr. Tiller last night.

He's always been phelper, it's just that nobody noticed until they saw the outcome.

57 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:30:03pm

re: #47 Charles

And Fox continues its slide into oblivion. . .

58 Shiplord Kirel  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:30:15pm

re: #48 Shiplord Kirel

He's gone Phelper on us, except that Phelps is much much careful about incitng violence.

is much much MORE careful

PIMF

59 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:30:42pm

re: #43 Last Mohican

re: #41 Walter L. Newton

By STRICT definition, a Christian is someone who accepts Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, thereby obtaining salvation. Such a person is commended to follow the lesson of His life. Randall Terry is not following the teachings of Jesus by his actions.

60 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:30:43pm

re: #21 Idle Drifter

He broke the needle on the Asshole Meter.

27 Megagarafalos!

61 LotharBot  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:31:09pm

re: #31 Charles

Yep. Scummy. The sane members of the pro-life movement need to continue to speak out against this, and marginalize this sort of extremism. We need fewer "he was murdered and it's sad, but he deserved it" comments and more "he was murdered, and that's abhorrent, and goes against our stance for life" comments. No matter your stance on abortion, we all have to be in agreement that murder is wrong and Randall Terry is nuts.

62 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:31:17pm

re: #41 Walter L. Newton

He's not a Christian.

Sounds like an example of the "No good Scotsman.." argument.

63 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:32:38pm
64 Last Mohican  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:33:13pm

re: #59 NelsFree

re: #41 Walter L. Newton

By STRICT definition, a Christian is someone who accepts Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, thereby obtaining salvation. Such a person is commended to follow the lesson of His life. Randall Terry is not following the teachings of Jesus by his actions.

Like I said "no true Christian."

65 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:33:30pm

re: #43 Last Mohican

You mean he's not a true Christian.

Randall Terry is as much a Christian as the next person that claims to be Christian. I'm not sure how many of you Lizards ever lived in the south, or attended fundamental churches, or paid much attention to a lot of the small independent churches spread all over this country, but this kind of thinking is not unusual AT ALL. This is not so rare and not so sub-rosa as you may suspect.

66 IanTheTerrible  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:33:35pm

Hmmm, sounds a lot like the far left after 9/11, no? "Chickens coming home to roost", and all that sorry claptrap. The extremities of our political system are just so damn predictable (and they think alike).

67 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:33:41pm

SOB is doubling down. Nucking futz.

Is it now appropriate to start comparing this kook to the craven idiots we see raving on MEMRI?

68 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:33:44pm

re: #62 Mich-again

Sounds like an example of the "No good Scotsman.." argument.

See his #1.

It has the sarc tag.

69 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:34:16pm

Smite not, lest you be smited

70 KingKenrod  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:34:20pm

re: #31 Charles

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

The part at the end about blaming the authorities and the jury that found Tiller innocent was pretty chilling.

71 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:34:30pm
72 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:34:50pm

re: #40 NelsFree
From wiki:
The benthic zone is the ecological region at the lowest level of a body of water such as an ocean or a lake, including the sediment surface and some sub-surface layers. Organisms living in this zone are called benthos. They generally live in close relationship with the substrate bottom; many such organisms are permanently attached to the bottom.

73 Last Mohican  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:34:55pm

re: #65 Walter L. Newton

Randall Terry is as much a Christian as the next person that claims to be Christian. I'm not sure how many of you Lizards ever lived in the south, or attended fundamental churches, or paid much attention to a lot of the small independent churches spread all over this country, but this kind of thinking is not unusual AT ALL. This is not so rare and not so sub-rosa as you may suspect.

That is deeply, deeply disturbing. But becoming much more clear to me as I see the sheer volume of hatred erupting after today's murder.

74 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:34:56pm

re: #60 jamgarr

A Garafalo. That's brilliant, worthy of an upding and consideration for future nomenclature.

75 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:35:13pm

re: #59 NelsFree

re: #41 Walter L. Newton

By STRICT definition, a Christian is someone who accepts Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, thereby obtaining salvation. Such a person is commended to follow the lesson of His life. Randall Terry is not following the teachings of Jesus by his actions.

He thinks so, who are you to judge him? I don't think so, but who am I to tell him he's not.

Round and round we go, google "no true scotsman" for more info. He's as Christian as he believes and as much as any other Christian agrees with him.

And that's a whole sick lot of Christians.

76 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:35:48pm
77 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:35:52pm

re: #64 Last Mohican

Like I said "no true Christian."

A textbook example of the No True Scotsman logical fallacy.

78 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:36:34pm

re: #31 Charles

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

Absolutely valid comparison, I could not agree more.

79 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:36:39pm

re: #72 Jim in Virginia

From wiki:
The benthic zone is the ecological region at the lowest level of a body of water such as an ocean or a lake, including the sediment surface and some sub-surface layers. Organisms living in this zone are called benthos. They generally live in close relationship with the substrate bottom; many such organisms are permanently attached to the bottom.

And Benthos now come in fruit-flavors AND mint.

/

80 Idle Drifter  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:36:40pm

re: #60 jamgarr

The meter is now glowing white hot and burning the floor.

81 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:36:41pm

re: #65 Walter L. Newton

Randall Terry is as much a Christian as the next person that claims to be Christian. I'm not sure how many of you Lizards ever lived in the south, or attended fundamental churches, or paid much attention to a lot of the small independent churches spread all over this country, but this kind of thinking is not unusual AT ALL. This is not so rare and not so sub-rosa as you may suspect.

I have and I am severely spooked by this shit...there is an infinite hit list before this mentality...money changers, unHoly rock and rollers, all the filth of the Earth all wrapped up in one tidy package...anyone could be a victim of this nonsense

82 Ojoe  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:36:42pm

re: #76 Iron Fist

Terry is true fringe.

83 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:36:49pm

re: #74 BigPapa

A Garafalo. That's brilliant, worthy of an upding and consideration for future nomenclature.


Any credit goes to Futurama ( Coolness measured in Megafonzies)

84 zombie  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:37:14pm

re: #75 Walter L. Newton

Round and round we go, google "no true scotsman" for more info. He's as Christian as he believes and as much as any other Christian agrees with him.

re: #77 Mich-again

A textbook example of the No True Scotsman logical fallacy.

See comment #5 at the top of this thread! :

He's employing the "No True Deranged Religious Psychopath" fallacy.

85 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:37:30pm

There are sane reasonable pro life groups in Kansas, Operation Rescue is not among them.

Here's what Kansans for Life had to say the day of the shooting.

86 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:37:45pm

re: #76 Iron Fist

I've lived in the south all my life, and have attended small churches, and I've never seen this. Not even close.

I have, but not in the churches.

87 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:37:48pm

re: #47 Charles

Randall Terry on the Sean Hannity show:


[Video]

Like I said earlier. That whole Notre Dame debacle elevated the chatter.

88 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:38:14pm

re: #65 Walter L. Newton

Randall Terry is as much a Christian as the next person that claims to be Christian. I'm not sure how many of you Lizards ever lived in the south, or attended fundamental churches, or paid much attention to a lot of the small independent churches spread all over this country, but this kind of thinking is not unusual AT ALL. This is not so rare and not so sub-rosa as you may suspect.


Walter, I'm willing to stretch my definition of a Christian pretty widely but anyone who advocates murder, no matter what else he claims to belive, is not a follower of Jesus Christ.

89 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:38:51pm

re: #87 Gus 802

A rising tide lifts all loons?

90 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:39:14pm

re: #75 Walter L. Newton

He thinks so, who are you to judge him? I don't think so, but who am I to tell him he's not.

Round and round we go, google "no true scotsman" for more info. He's as Christian as he believes and as much as any other Christian agrees with him.

And that's a whole sick lot of Christians.

That's why it's up to Christian who disagree with Randall to be heard. Not only proclaim him to be wrong, but show why based on scripture.

To say Randall does not speak for all Christians.

91 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:39:34pm

re: #89 Lawrior

A rising tide lifts all loons?

It sure does. Unfortunately the tide is still rising.

92 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:39:47pm

re: #79 OldLineTexan

And Benthos now come in fruit-flavors AND mint.

/

Put some in a Diet Pepsi and watch the fun!

93 freetoken  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:39:52pm

re: #52 KingKenrod

Not only that, now AP comes to defend BOR! I just read AP's latest entry, and it seemed to me to be a very awkward side shuffle of sorts... not really addressing that, even though truly O'R was not responsible for the killing of Tiller, O'R was part of the chorus who found it important to re-emphasize over and over that Tiller should be put out of business.

I'm not defending Tiller as an abortionist, nor accusing O'R of complicity in the actual crime, but I do believe that there is way, way too much incitement for turmoil on the part of many who want to make a buck off the malcontent.

94 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:40:02pm

re: #88 Jim in Virginia

Walter, I'm willing to stretch my definition of a Christian pretty widely but anyone who advocates murder, no matter what else he claims to belive, is not a follower of Jesus Christ.

well there you have it...they have their definition and you have yours...I have a feeling it goes back to the beginning of time

95 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:40:05pm

re: #1 Walter L. Newton

He's not really a Christian.
/

One gamillion down-dings, if I could.

Please, show me where Christ exhorts His followers to kill others.

96 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:40:10pm

If people let Randall Terry continue this crap unopposed, he will utterly destroy the pro life movement in this country. That's my prediction.

97 LotharBot  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:40:13pm

re: #65 Walter L. Newton

Randall Terry is as much a Christian as the next person that claims to be Christian.

It's a sad commentary on those who claim to be Christians that so few actually follow Christ.

The reason "no true Scotsman" is a fallacy is because it uses an irrelevant marker to discard someone from a group. A Scotsman is a man of Scottish birth or ancestry; it has nothing to do with his behavior. One can, however, fairly say that no true Scotsman is actually a Frenchwoman -- being either french or a woman disqualify someone from the category "Scotsman".

Likewise, it's not a fallacy to say that "no true Christian" would engage in certain behaviors which are not Christ-like. Nelsfree's #59 is right on the money -- "advocating murder" is in fact a relevant avenue by which one can be shown not to belong to the group of "true Christians".

98 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:40:14pm

re: #76 Iron Fist

I've lived in the south all my life, and have attended small churches, and I've never seen this. Not even close.

You hung out with a better brand of Christians than I did, when I was a believer.

99 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:40:28pm

re: #92 jcm

Put some in a Diet Pepsi and watch the fun!

Use leaded, I mean why hold back. ;)

100 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:41:04pm

re: #95 MandyManners

One gamillion down-dings, if I could.

Please, show me where Christ exhorts His followers to kill others.

Sarc tag...

No True Scotsman...

101 Spare O'Lake  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:41:04pm

Down with religious intolerance and vigilantism.
Up with the rule of law.

102 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:41:33pm

re: #65 Walter L. Newton

Dear Walter,

You seem to be down on religion, especially Christianity. Is your glass half empty tonight?

103 zombie  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:41:38pm

re: #88 Jim in Virginia

Walter, I'm willing to stretch my definition of a Christian pretty widely but anyone who advocates murder, no matter what else he claims to belive, is not a follower of Jesus Christ.

And Randall Terry will say that anyone who fails to prevent murders (of "unborn children"), such as you since you didn't heroically shoot any abortionists today, is not a true Christian either.

And that right there is my problem with being a member of any organized religion. Because the entire concept of organized religion is one vast exercise of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.

104 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:41:50pm

re: #99 DEZes

Use leaded, I mean why hold back. ;)

Didn't Mythbusters show Diet worked better...
Can't remember...

105 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:42:38pm

re: #97 LotharBot

It's a sad commentary on those who claim to be Christians that so few actually follow Christ.

The reason "no true Scotsman" is a fallacy is because it uses an irrelevant marker to discard someone from a group. A Scotsman is a man of Scottish birth or ancestry; it has nothing to do with his behavior. One can, however, fairly say that no true Scotsman is actually a Frenchwoman -- being either french or a woman disqualify someone from the category "Scotsman".

Likewise, it's not a fallacy to say that "no true Christian" would engage in certain behaviors which are not Christ-like. Nelsfree's #59 is right on the money -- "advocating murder" is in fact a relevant avenue by which one can be shown not to belong to the group of "true Christians".

I don't agree. There is no test, it's a profession of faith. That's what they tell me all the time. A murderer on his death bed can "find Christ" and they tell me he is saved.

Over and over, it's a profession of faith, not a act of works. That's what I have heard all my life.

106 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:42:39pm

re: #89 Lawrior

A rising tide lifts all loons?

That should be a rotating title.

107 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:42:39pm

re: #94 albusteve

well there you have it...they have their definition and you have yours...I have a feeling it goes back to the beginning of time

Not all 6,000 years of it? Impossible!

/

108 1SG(ret)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:42:46pm

Nothing this SOB says relates to being a Christian. Saying one is Christian doesn't make it so. Being a Christian means acting and living the Christian life as best one can.

yeah and I know the No Scotsman BS will appear in 3..2..1

109 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:43:08pm
110 solomonpanting  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:43:16pm

Reading a bit of background on this fellow sure is, uh, interesting.

111 1SG(ret)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:44:01pm

re: #65 Walter L. Newton

Wide Brush there. Links?

112 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:44:08pm

Terry's Wiki:

In the early 1980s, Terry married Cindy Dean, a woman he had met in Bible school.[4][5] In 1985, he met a woman who had borne her second child in prison and was planning an abortion rather than bear a third. Terry persuaded her to continue the pregnancy and a daughter named Tila was born later that year. In 1987, Cindy and Randall Terry had a daughter together whom they named Faith.[5] In March 1988, they took in Tila, then aged 3, and her siblings Jamiel, 8, and Ebony, 12, as foster children. All three are biracial; their mother was white. Terry formally adopted the two younger children in 1994 and began describing his family on his résumé as: "Children: One by birth and three black foster children," although Ebony had left home at the age of 16 in 1991.[4] Ebony, who was not adopted by Terry, uses the surname Whetstone, but both Jamiel and Tila took and retain the surname Terry.[4][5]

Though she was only 16 when she left home, Ebony Whetstone soon became pregnant and would eventually have two children outside of marriage.[4] She converted to Islam, a religion her father has preached is composed of "murderers" and "terrorists."[4] In 2004, Terry described his relationship with Ebony as "good."[4] However, Terry banned Tila from his home after she became pregnant outside of marriage twice by age 18; her first pregnancy ended in miscarriage.[4][6]

He has also banished his adopted son. In 1998, when Terry was running for Congress and accused of racism, his son Jamiel stepped forward to defend him.[4] In 2000, Jamiel worked with his father on Steven Forbes's campaign for the Republican nomination for U.S. President, and campaigned with his father against gay marriage in Vermont.[4] In 2004, Jamiel publicly announced that he was a homosexual and wrote an article for Out Magazine for which he was paid $2,500.[4] Terry contends much of the article was written by other people and most of the statements purported to be facts in the article were untrue. Terry promptly disowned his son and claimed that he had "prostituted" the family name. He attributed Jamiel's sexuality to his biological mother, saying that she was a prostitute.[4] Jamiel's response was, "My father's first and foremost aim is to protect himself. He talks about how I prostitute the family's name, but he's used the fact that he saved my sister from abortion and rescued me from hardship in his speeches and interviews. What's the difference?"[4]

When he learned in 2004 that his son was giving an interview about his orientation to the Washington Post, Terry pre-empted Jamiel by writing an essay, My Prodigal Son, the Homosexual,[7] which was published on Terry's own website and several other websites, rejecting his son and referring to his life as "a shambles."[4]

In 2000, Terry divorced his wife of 19 years, Cindy,[4] and married his former church assistant, a young woman named Andrea Sue Kollmorgen.[5][6][8] Kollmorgen, born circa 1976, was approximately 25 at the time of their nuptials;[9] Terry is 17 years older. As a consequence of the divorce, the home on 119 acres where he had lived with Cindy and their four children was to be sold.[8] His decision to divorce in 2000 to marry the youthful Kollmorgen was unfavorably contrasted in the mainstream press to his own stern judgment expressed in his 1995 book, The Judgment of God: "Families are destroyed as a father vents his mid life crisis by abandoning his wife for a 'younger, prettier model.' "[4] His sentiments against divorce had been so strong that when his own parents divorced, "Randall refused to let his children speak with their grandfather for three years," according to interviews with the family done by the Washington Post.[4]

SNIP

Fucking hypocrite.

113 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:44:29pm

Callahan, your up late.
You OKay?

114 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:44:46pm

re: #105 Walter L. Newton

I don't agree. There is no test, it's a profession of faith. That's what they tell me all the time. A murderer on his death bed can "find Christ" and they tell me he is saved.

Over and over, it's a profession of faith, not a act of works. That's what I have heard all my life.

You were taught poorly.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit." (Matthew 7: 16-17)

115 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:45:05pm

re: #47 Charles

Randall Terry on the Sean Hannity show:

[Video]

In the end of that video Randall Terry compares Barack Obama to Adolph Hitler.

116 notutopia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:45:26pm

Why does this guy remind me of David Duke and Bill Ayers in the 70's? He is INCITING and doing his damnedest to try to convince his shaky followers and others that Dr. Tiller's MURDER was justified, that he actually DESERVED to be murdered. And, for them to not back down and persevere.
You're right Charles, this idea is truly sick. He and his followers who believe that Dr. Tiller earned his death, are SICK.

117 Racer X  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:45:48pm

Blondes march in Latvia 'to cheer-up nation

Several hundred blonde women marched through the Latvian capital Riga yesterday in a bid to cheer up the crisis-hit Baltic nation, suffering the worst recession of all 27 EU member states.

"Finally something different, something positive because I'm tired of hearing about the crisis," said another, 70-year-old Ausma.

118 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:45:49pm

re: #103 zombie

And Randall Terry will say that anyone who fails to prevent murders (of "unborn children"), such as you since you didn't heroically shoot any abortionists today, is not a true Christian either.

And that right there is my problem with being a member of any organized religion. Because the entire concept of organized religion is one vast exercise of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.

If he can show me where Jesus killed evildoers, I'll agree with him.

119 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:45:58pm

I need a nirther thread to cheer me up :(

The crazy just keeps on coming.

120 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:04pm

re: #103 zombie

And Randall Terry will say that anyone who fails to prevent murders (of "unborn children"), such as you since you didn't heroically shoot any abortionists today, is not a true Christian either.

And that right there is my problem with being a member of any organized religion. Because the entire concept of organized religion is one vast exercise of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.

You said it so much better than I did, mainly because I have a lot of problem keeping a civil tongue when it comes to this kind of rhetoric.

Fundamentalist crow about how being saved is just believing in Christ and that he died for you. Catholics say it has as much to do with works, the proof of your faith.

So, which is it. Do we judge Randall Terry by what he believes or what he does? Which is it?

121 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:14pm

re: #105 Walter L. Newton

That's what they tell me all the time.

Who are "they". Just curious.

122 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:17pm

Ow.

I had my first CQB class in quite some time earlier this evening. The instructor, a 9th Dan black belt, I guess decided he liked me, so he used me for a lot of "demonstrations".

I repeat: Ow.

123 Spare O'Lake  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:18pm

Get your stinking paws off my daughter's body.

124 LotharBot  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:19pm

re: #105 Walter L. Newton

I don't agree. There is no test, it's a profession of faith. That's what they tell me all the time. A murderer on his death bed can "find Christ" and they tell me he is saved.

Over and over, it's a profession of faith, not a act of works. That's what I have heard all my life.

Both Paul and James are clear that what they mean by "faith" is not merely an intellectual belief or a statement, but a change in one's outlook and behavior. One can certainly undergo such a change at any time (including on their deathbed)... but once they have, their outlook and behavior will change accordingly, and they will not do such things as advocate murder.

Works are not the method of salvation... but they are a result. If your works don't change, that's evidence that you haven't undergone the aforementioned transformation.

125 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:22pm

re: #92 jcm

Put some in a Diet Pepsi and watch the fun!

Indeed. Most folks think that a chemical reaction occurs when Benthos and Diet Pepsi are mixed. What REALLY happens, is, you're stirring up sediment! Veryvery fast!
/h

126 Ward Cleaver  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:26pm

Terry may be a Christian, but he's not a good Christian.

/understatement of the millennium

127 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:51pm

re: #117 Racer X

Blondes march in Latvia 'to cheer-up nation

Several hundred blonde women marched through the Latvian capital Riga yesterday in a bid to cheer up the crisis-hit Baltic nation, suffering the worst recession of all 27 EU member states.

"Finally something different, something positive because I'm tired of hearing about the crisis," said another, 70-year-old Ausma.

I have to get to Latvia.

"Me heap big photographer for LIFE."

/

128 Last Mohican  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:46:52pm

re: #108 1SG(ret)

Nothing this SOB says relates to being a Christian. Saying one is Christian doesn't make it so. Being a Christian means acting and living the Christian life as best one can.

yeah and I know the No Scotsman BS will appear in 3..2..1

The point is, who gets to decide who is a true Christian, and who isn't? Not you. Not Randall Terry. Not anyone on Earth, I'd say.

So we're stuck with the term. Anyone who adopts a perverted, offensive mischaracterization of Jesus' words and believes that he is a Christian, is a Christian. And the same goes for any other religion.

129 Ward Cleaver  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:47:30pm

re: #117 Racer X

Blondes march in Latvia 'to cheer-up nation

Several hundred blonde women marched through the Latvian capital Riga yesterday in a bid to cheer up the crisis-hit Baltic nation, suffering the worst recession of all 27 EU member states.

"Finally something different, something positive because I'm tired of hearing about the crisis," said another, 70-year-old Ausma.

It looks like a "Legally Blond" convention.

130 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:47:31pm

I caught a bit of O'Reilly. He specifically flagged Kos and Huffington for blaming him for the murder. A bit offended was he. He went on to say, in so many words, that this act would not deter his anti-abortion (Catholic) stance on the matter. In no way did he endorse nor in any way naysay this murderous act that I could detect.

131 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:47:32pm

re: #111 1SG(ret)

Wide Brush there. Links?

Links. I'm talking about "doing" the faith. You want links, join some fundamentalist churches, some holly roller churches, some small independent churches in the south, come on, you expect everything to be linked to something.

132 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:47:37pm

re: #31 Charles

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

b-b-b-but malkin and all of the right wing talk show hosts told me domestic terrorism is all just a bunch of blame-america-first liberal hyperventilating!

///

133 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:47:53pm

re: #122 Occasional Reader

Ow.

I had my first CQB class in quite some time earlier this evening. The instructor, a 9th Dan black belt, I guess decided he liked me, so he used me for a lot of "demonstrations".

I repeat: Ow.

Shouldn't have introduced yourself as "OR".

/bad press lately

134 HoosierHoops  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:48:16pm

Well my lizard friends..This is a hard thing to do...They just published my friends Obit..
[Link: www.bakerfuneralservice.com...]

135 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:48:36pm

re: #132 ihateronpaul

b-b-b-but malkin and all of the right wing talk show hosts told me domestic terrorism is all just a bunch of blame-america-first liberal hyperventilating!

///

Did they really? All of them? Really?

136 gtrs  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:48:48pm

that dude has teh crazy all over him

137 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:48:52pm

I am profoundly happy I have no dog in the Christian/Jesus/Faith fight...but I thoroughly enjoy watching others brawl over it...rock on!

138 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:48:52pm

re: #121 Mich-again

Who are "they". Just curious.

I said fundamentalist. It's an act of faith to be save, not works. Randall says he's saved, he is, at least we can't really know.

139 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:49:15pm
140 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:49:23pm

re: #134 HoosierHoops

Well my lizard friends..This is a hard thing to do...They just published my friends Obit..
[Link: www.bakerfuneralservice.com...]


Condolences HH. What was your friend's name?

141 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:49:27pm

re: #134 HoosierHoops

Well my lizard friends..This is a hard thing to do...They just published my friends Obit..
[Link: www.bakerfuneralservice.com...]

Any true Christians here to pray for Hoops?

142 callahan23  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:49:41pm

re: #113 DEZes

Callahan, your up late.
You OKay?

You are right. Need to call it a night.
I truly love you (Lizards}, mostly.

My friend (DEZes)

143 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:49:47pm

Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

Do these sound like the words of someone who wants His followers to shoot people dead?

144 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:49:57pm
145 notutopia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:50:24pm

re: #134 HoosierHoops

My sincere condolences for your loss, HoosierHoops.

146 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:50:25pm

re: #127 OldLineTexan

I have to get to Latvia.

"Me heap big photographer for LIFE."

/

I'll take Catch-22 quotes for $500, Alex.

147 LotharBot  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:50:36pm

Walter,

even "fundamentalists" seem to be aware of James' argument that "faith without works is dead". So I'm pretty sure we really can know.

Fundamentalists are often the first to declare that someone else doesn't really have faith, based on their works.

148 cat-tikvah  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:50:40pm

So, what is this -- "hate the sin, kill the sinner?" Revolting. It's Christofascism, and yes, I agree with Charles, Operation Rescue and other extremist groups have incited this violence.
As I recall, the Ku Klux Klan was utterly bankrupted by a lawsuit that demonstrated that inciting such violence makes you accountable for it, after the murder of a black man in the Northwest. Claims that they didn't actually tell anyone to specifically go out and kill people relieved the KKK of responsibility didn't wash, and shouldn't here.
I'd like to see Operation Rescue similarly sued and bankrupted.
There are any number of groups that justify threats, harassment, and killing with their beliefs, and they're all wrong. Think animal rights cretins, environmental eco-terrorists, and so on.
All true Christians need to condemn such unforgiveable, and heinous violence, and yes, groups that have ratcheted up the rhetoric should man up and see the blood on their hands.

149 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:50:54pm

re: #142 callahan23

You are right. Need to call it a night.
I truly love you (Lizards}, mostly.

My friend (DEZes)

Sleep well my friend.

150 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:51:04pm

re: #141 DEZes

Any true Christians here to pray for Hoops?

No, we're all bastards.

/I killed Kenny

151 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:51:07pm

Oops! That's from Matthew 11: 28-30.

152 HoosierHoops  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:51:40pm

re: #140 jamgarr

Condolences HH. What was your friend's name?

Flash link didn't work.I'm a mess ..go here then click on Alan Jones II..
[Link: www.bakerfuneralservice.com...]

153 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:51:49pm

re: #144 Dar ul Harbarian

Whoda thunkit?

Dick Cheney: Pro Gay Marriage.

And some Christians would claim that Cheney couldn't be a Christian because of this stance. Where does it stop?

154 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:51:58pm

re: #135 OldLineTexan

Did they really? All of them? Really?

yeah they were pretty darn insistent during the DHS "controversy" that the report was "a bunch of crap" (probably the exact words mark levin used)

and the report covered idiots like this.

155 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:14pm

re: #138 Walter L. Newton

You will know them by their fruit. Grapes aren't gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles, are they? Mat 7:16.

156 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:32pm

re: #153 Walter L. Newton

And some Christians would claim that Cheney couldn't be a Christian because of this stance. Where does it stop?

Wouldn't the Republicanists call him a RINO now?

//

157 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:35pm

re: #150 OldLineTexan

No, we're all bastards.

/I killed Kenny

Just how many times are you gonna kill Kenny, dont make me turn this car around.

158 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:47pm

re: #136 gtrs

that dude has teh crazy all over him

DONT POKE TEH CRAZY!

159 Ward Cleaver  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:47pm

re: #141 DEZes

Any true Christians here to pray for Hoops?

I don't know about true Christians, but I'll pray for him.

160 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:50pm

re: #31 Charles

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

All that's missing is his prop AK-74 leaning up against the wall behind him.

161 pre-Boomer Marine brat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:54pm

Randall Terry,
In a sense falling only JUST short of reality, ... you, sir, pulled the trigger.
You are a cold-blooded, callous, murderer.
And I believe you like it.

/leaving now ... to get myself mellowed out before bedtime

162 Honcho  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:52:56pm

re: #122 Occasional Reader

9th Dan? It wasn't an aikido dojo, was't?

163 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:53:09pm

re: #134 HoosierHoops

Well my lizard friends..This is a hard thing to do...They just published my friends Obit..
[Link: www.bakerfuneralservice.com...]

Hoosier, so very sorry about your loss.

164 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:53:14pm

re: #103 zombie

And Randall Terry will say that anyone who fails to prevent murders (of "unborn children"), such as you since you didn't heroically shoot any abortionists today, is not a true Christian either.

And that right there is my problem with being a member of any organized religion. Because the entire concept of organized religion is one vast exercise of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.

I would tell Terry the fact there are any abortions is a failing of him as a Christian, is a failing of all Christians.

Not that we've failed to take action, not that we failed to vote, to protest or anything temporal.

Our duty is not to succeed in the temporal world. Ours is to succeed in the spiritual one.

Terry and all Christians (myself included) have failed in the spiritual warfare.

We have failed in faith.
We have failed in prayer.
We have failed in the oneness of spirit, Christ's most earnest prayer before his death.
We have failed to share our faith with others.

Our response should not be shooters, it should be Terry's, our response as Christians should be to look inward, not outward.

Not as a guilt trip, but to recognize how short we are in matters of faith.
To cease our political efforts, our protests, our cursing the darkness, and to light the candle of faith, one candle at a time.

165 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:53:38pm

re: #153 Walter L. Newton

And some Christians would claim that Cheney couldn't be a Christian because of this stance. Where does it stop?

When the axe is all ground away, apparently.

166 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:53:43pm

re: #152 HoosierHoops

Flash link didn't work.I'm a mess ..go here then click on Alan Jones II..
[Link: www.bakerfuneralservice.com...]


Way too young

167 solomonpanting  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:53:52pm

re: #152 HoosierHoops

Was it in the line of duty?
My condolences.

168 Pvt Bin Jammin  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:53:55pm

re: #152 HoosierHoops

So very sorry to hear of your loss. My prayers go with the family and friends.

169 Egregious Philbin  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:54:05pm

If hell exists, they have already named a wing after this SOB.

170 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:54:29pm

re: #154 ihateronpaul

yeah they were pretty darn insistent during the DHS "controversy" that the report was "a bunch of crap" (probably the exact words mark levin used)

and the report covered idiots like this.

ALL of them? Wow. You must spend all day listening. That's a lot of work.

171 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:54:52pm

re: #162 Honcho

9th Dan? It wasn't an aikido dojo, was't?

No. I ain't sayin' more than that about who the instructor was, in the name of my cherished net anonymity.

172 DEZes  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:06pm

re: #159 Ward Cleaver

I don't know about true Christians, but I'll pray for him.

I said that just for the no true Scotsman argument.

Lizards, I must bail, have a great one.
Hoops, God be with you.

173 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:07pm

guess which website has a hateful and homophobic essay by randall terry?

[Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...]


Who-da-thunk-it?

174 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:12pm

I saw a sign on the road today and it reminded me a bit of the current political scene. It said. "Right lane must turn right."

175 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:16pm

re: #102 NelsFree

Dear Walter,

You seem to be down on religion, especially Christianity. Is your glass half empty tonight?


OT: The glass is not half empty or half full. The glass is too big.

176 big steve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:30pm

about 3 minutes in...what the hell is wrong with his left index finger upper knuckle?

177 Ward Cleaver  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:31pm

re: #144 Dar ul Harbarian

Whoda thunkit?

Dick Cheney: Pro Gay Marriage.



"I think that freedom means freedom for everyone," replied the former V.P. "As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay and it is something we have lived with for a long time in our family. I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. Any kind of arrangement they wish..."

Uh, that could get interesting.

/i now pronounce you man... and goat

178 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:36pm

re: #155 Mich-again

I tried that already, didn't take.

179 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:38pm

re: #117 Racer X

Blondes march in Latvia 'to cheer-up nation

Several hundred blonde women marched through the Latvian capital Riga yesterday in a bid to cheer up the crisis-hit Baltic nation, suffering the worst recession of all 27 EU member states.

"Finally something different, something positive because I'm tired of hearing about the crisis," said another, 70-year-old Ausma.

WOW. Smokin' hot. All of them.

180 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:55:52pm

re: #173 ihateronpaul

guess which website has a hateful and homophobic essay by randall terry?

[Link: www.worldnetdaily.com...]

Who-da-thunk-it?

He's also big on the anti immigration schtick as well.

181 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:56:15pm

re: #166 jamgarr

Way too young

He was 20 days older than I am. Time to check my life insurance and hug my Mrs extra special tonight.

182 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:56:33pm

re: #175 Jim in Virginia

OT: The glass is not half empty or half full. The glass is too big.

You have done well, grasshopper. You may now leave Willy's and seek your fortune in the world.

/

183 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:56:37pm

re: #144 Dar ul Harbarian

Whoda thunkit?

Dick Cheney: Pro Gay Marriage.

CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO!

*snicker*

I almost kept a straight face while typing that.

184 zombie  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:07pm

re: #124 LotharBot

Both Paul and James are clear that what they mean by "faith" is not merely an intellectual belief or a statement, but a change in one's outlook and behavior. One can certainly undergo such a change at any time (including on their deathbed)... but once they have, their outlook and behavior will change accordingly, and they will not do such things as advocate murder.

Works are not the method of salvation... but they are a result. If your works don't change, that's evidence that you haven't undergone the aforementioned transformation.

That is the fundamental basis of Calvinism -- but it leads to all sorts of bizarre beliefs, including the once-commonly held notion that rich people are blessed by God because their success is an indicator of their faith, whereas poor people are accursed.

Yes, yes, I know, Jesus said all sort sof nice things about poor people; but the moment any theology arises based on Biblical principles, that theology (whatever it may by) almost inevitably devolves into something distasteful or weird. There is no "pure" Christianity left anymore, despite a million denominations each claiming to be the One True Way.

185 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:10pm

re: #179 Truck Monkey

WOW. Smokin' hot. All of them.

Viva Latvia! Or... erm... however you say "viva!" in Latvian.

186 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:17pm

re: #177 Ward Cleaver

Uh, that could get interesting.

/i now pronounce you man... and goat

Opening the door to polygamist bestiality, too!

187 Ward Cleaver  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:19pm

re: #152 HoosierHoops

Flash link didn't work.I'm a mess ..go here then click on Alan Jones II..
[Link: www.bakerfuneralservice.com...]

Oh my, Hoops. He was the 6' 10" guy? I'll pray of the repose of his soul, and all who grieve.

188 HoosierHoops  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:21pm

re: #167 solomonpanting

Was it in the line of duty?
My condolences.

No..He had a heart defect..He was on the Cell with his wife when he suddenly died...Everyone is crushed...In a few days I have some great stories to tell..
That's all I can do...Leave a permanent record for an American policeman that was just a wonderful person..And a good friend...

189 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:23pm

re: #183 MandyManners

CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO! CHENEY'S A RINO!

*snicker*

I almost kept a straight face while typing that.

I didn't when I read it...
Pardon me while I go clean off my keyboard.

190 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:30pm

re: #180 Thanos

He's also big on the anti immigration schtick as well.

Well, shit, by the logic of many posts here that makes me just like him.

///

191 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:40pm

re: #160 Occasional Reader

All that's missing is his prop AK-74 leaning up against the wall behind him.

And, the severed head of an infidel?

192 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:57:56pm

re: #174 Mich-again

I saw a sign on the road today and it reminded me a bit of the current political scene. It said. "Right lane must turn right."


I've heard that the Obama Administration is toying with the idea of the following slogan:
This administration does not turn right on Reds

193 Charles Johnson  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:58:05pm

re: #115 Gus 802

In the end of that video Randall Terry compares Barack Obama to Adolph Hitler.

And Hannity didn't even blink at it.

194 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:58:18pm

re: #182 OldLineTexan

You have done well, grasshopper. You may now leave Willy's and seek your fortune in the world.

/

I will leave my Willy when they pry it out of my cold, dead han...

Wait. Let me rephrase.

195 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:58:41pm

My point being, all through my snarky comments, is we should stop wasting our time saying 'he's not a true Christian" and simply start to speak against this sort of behavior, in anyone. In Terry, in those three men who tried to bomb the synagogue , radical Islam and so on.

196 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:58:46pm

re: #185 Occasional Reader

Viva Latvia! Or... erm... however you say "viva!" in Latvian.

Well, in Canoga Parkian it would be 'bow chica wow wow.'

197 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:06pm

re: #170 OldLineTexan

ALL of them? Wow. You must spend all day listening. That's a lot of work.

I listen to quite a few talk shows rather often thank you very much. I didn't hear one conservative commentator not spew out the michelle malkin talking points about it, and insinuating that the report is useless by doing so. "Oh the whole thing is a liberal plot to discredit our veterans"

all lies and half-truths, but they were still said.

198 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:09pm

re: #120 Walter L. Newton
Still waiting for an answer to my question: why are you down on religion? You said you once were a believer. Some of your posts belie little understanding of Christianity. Other of your posts indicate pent up anger. So, what up with you, Walter?

199 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:09pm

no offense

200 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:12pm

Wait... SWEDEN had a covert nuke bomb program during the Cold War?!

(Watching the Military Channel)

201 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:30pm

A lot of NWO / Jew Hate sites are posting this vid, they love it.

202 Kragar  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:31pm

re: #193 Charles

And Hannity didn't even blink at it.

Well, the kids love it.

/

203 experiencedtraveller  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:42pm

re: #100 jcm

Sarc tag...

No True Scotsman...

Apologies for the down ding jcm. I like you a lot. But the "no true scotsman" argument has gone too far. Its become a pithy rebuttal to any defense of Christianity whenever someone claiming to be a Christian is caught behaving satanically. This man was a socio-path and a murderer and he is not a Christian and surely never was a Christian.

I wear a NY Rangers jersey and post on NY Rangers websites. I am not a NY Ranger.

204 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 6:59:48pm

re: #195 Walter L. Newton

Randall Terry is Ayatollah in a business suit.

205 Jewels (AKA Julian)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:00:21pm

US lab debuts super laser
[Link: www.breitbart.com...]

206 TheMatrix31  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:00:30pm

re: #144 Dar ul Harbarian

Whoda thunkit?

Dick Cheney: Pro Gay Marriage.

Show Obama supporters that, along with a link about Obama not being in favor of gay marriage, and watch their heads explode!

207 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:00:34pm

re: #193 Charles

And Hannity didn't even blink at it.

Makes me sick. Seemed like for a long time we didn't hear a peep from Randall Terry. None of the abortion laws changed under Bush but as soon as Obama came into office there he was once again after 8 years of silence more or less. The last two days reminded me of how much I despised the man in the 80s and 90s.

208 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:00:41pm

re: #197 ihateronpaul

I listen to quite a few talk shows rather often thank you very much. I didn't hear one conservative commentator not spew out the michelle malkin talking points about it, and insinuating that the report is useless by doing so. "Oh the whole thing is a liberal plot to discredit our veterans"

all lies and half-truths, but they were still said.

Now it's down to quite a few. First it was all. Have you started slacking? I'm proud.

209 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:00:52pm

re: #171 Occasional Reader

No. I ain't sayin' more than that about who the instructor was, in the name of my cherished net anonymity.


We know who you are, Senator Graham.

210 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:01:08pm

Charles, WND links upthread, I know you don't like those but this one's pertinent

211 gtrs  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:01:10pm

re: #130 The Shadow Do
he was extremely infllammatory in the past talking about "TILLER THE BABY KILLER" over and over and over again

212 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:01:18pm

re: #200 Occasional Reader

Wait... SWEDEN had a covert nuke bomb program during the Cold War?!

(Watching the Military Channel)

The bikeenee teem wuss a distrackshun, yah yu betcha.

/

213 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:01:36pm

re: #195 Walter L. Newton

My point being, all through my snarky comments, is we should stop wasting our time saying 'he's not a true Christian" and simply start to speak against this sort of behavior, in anyone. In Terry, in those three men who tried to bomb the synagogue , radical Islam and so on.

agreed...the Christian aspect of it while interesting is a waste of time

214 Killgore Trout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:01:40pm

re: #31 Charles

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

I'm very pleased to see that comment with so many updings.

215 Honcho  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:02:22pm

re: #171 Occasional Reader

frozen peas are better than ice...

my old girlfriend used to say "you have to learn to play hurt"

of course, she's dead, now...

216 freetoken  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:02:31pm

re: #173 ihateronpaul

Yes, the same site that currently has as its top banner yet another 'nirther story (this one about flooding the WH website with calls for the 'nirth c.)

Other headline stories include the one about the Administration seeking to keep private citizens from trying to bring foreign heads of state into 9/11 trials and various Christian persecution themes.

Two are about creationism - the first about how creationist evangelist Hoviland is being persecuted for his beliefs, and of course yet another sale on that special Darwin led to Hitler video.

/Cream of the [Link: WWW...] no doubt...

217 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:03:01pm

re: #193 Charles

And Hannity didn't even blink at it.

Hannity is a maroon!

218 Killgore Trout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:03:08pm

re: #183 MandyManners

I'm happy to see the wheels coming off the cart on that one too.

219 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:03:15pm

re: #198 NelsFree

Still waiting for an answer to my question: why are you down on religion? You said you once were a believer. Some of your posts belie little understanding of Christianity. Other of your posts indicate pent up anger. So, what up with you, Walter?

Belie little understanding of Christianity? I don't think so. And what's with the armchair psychoanalysis? No, I'm not angry, really. I'm an atheist.

220 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:03:53pm

re: #151 MandyManners

It's not Jesus that's the problem; it's some of his followers that pick and choose the parts they like to justify their actions. The Old Testament is chock full of that can be used as justification for killing if you so choose.

221 Killgore Trout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:04:17pm

re: #180 Thanos

Ugh.

222 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:04:29pm

re: #193 Charles

And Hannity didn't even blink at it.

Hannity often commits "sins of omissions" by acting like ridiculously wack shit being said never happened. One must look back to his roots, when he was suspended 24 hours into his broadcasting career for featuring a guest who was viciously anti-gay. It took the ACLU to get his career back on track. He seems to gloss over that telling point of his experience in "broadcast excellence."

I also find it annoying how all he friggin does is repeat talking points. It's like he stores them in his hand, and "conjures" them by counting them out on his fingers. So instead of going into the issue he will go on about stupid fucking bullshit like obama liking dijon mustard and it just becomes a self-parody of anything resembling political commentary.

223 Jim in Virginia  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:04:44pm

re: #197 ihateronpaul
Love your nic. Have you ever met the man? You have to know him to really hate him.

224 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:04:46pm

re: #220 Lawrior

It's not Jesus that's the problem; it's some of his followers that pick and choose the parts they like to justify their actions. The Old Testament is chock full of that can be used as justification for killing if you so choose.

And so can the Greek scriptures.

225 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:05:10pm
226 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:05:10pm

re: #221 Killgore Trout

Ugh.

Also noticing that Randall Terry's been on Alex Jones a few times...

227 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:05:20pm

re: #115 Gus 802

In the end of that video Randall Terry compares Barack Obama to Adolph Hitler.

If Randall Terry were President [G-D forbid] he would give Hitler a run for his money.

I'm so sick of these extremists invoking Hitler. If they were around while Hitler was doing his thing, they'd all be happily pitching in.

228 freetoken  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:05:25pm

From the WND story on Hovind from yesterday:

Kent Hovind's followers, however, contend he was prosecuted because of his religious convictions – and because he was so effective in exposing what he calls "the big lie of evolution."

Yup, the IRS - tool of the Darwinists!

229 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:05:33pm

re: #207 Gus 802

Makes me sick. Seemed like for a long time we didn't hear a peep from Randall Terry. None of the abortion laws changed under Bush but as soon as Obama came into office there he was once again after 8 years of silence more or less. The last two days reminded me of how much I despised the man in the 80s and 90s.

Kind of like homeless people re-appear after the election of a republican.

230 1SG(ret)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:06:00pm

re: #131 Walter L. Newton

I live in the south and am a member of an Independent Baptist Church. Nothing like this has ever been said or preached where I've been. I still say you paint with a broad brush. But I should have stayed out of the debate, for these threads usually become more about Christian bashing than the subject matter. The Guy is an asshole!

231 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:06:38pm

re: #208 OldLineTexan

Now it's down to quite a few. First it was all. Have you started slacking? I'm proud.

Alright smart guy, show me an example to the contrary, of a right wing talk show host not going against the DHS report.

232 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:06:42pm

re: #230 1SG(ret)

I live in the south and am a member of an Independent Baptist Church. Nothing like this has ever been said or preached where I've been. I still say you paint with a broad brush. But I should have stayed out of the debate, for these threads usually become more about Christian bashing than the subject matter. The Guy is an asshole!

Yep, he is.

233 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:07:02pm

re: #144 Dar ul Harbarian

Whoda thunkit?

Dick Cheney: Pro Gay Marriage.

"I think that freedom means freedom for everyone," replied the former V.P. "As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay and it is something we have lived with for a long time in our family. I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. Any kind of arrangement they wish. The question of whether or not there ought to be a federal statute to protect this, I don't support. I do believe that the historically the way marriage has been regulated is at the state level. It has always been a state issue and I think that is the way it ought to be handled, on a state-by-state basis. ... But I don't have any problem with that. People ought to get a shot at that."

As one who has a lot in common with Dick Cheney, both politically and the loving father of a gay daughter, I say good on him. Cheney is one of the most principled and decent politicos I know.

234 Killgore Trout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:07:19pm

re: #226 Thanos

Yeesh.
/The only words I have left to criticize the right with are monosyllabic grunts and clicks.

235 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:07:55pm

re: #223 Jim in Virginia

Love your nic. Have you ever met the man? You have to know him to really hate him.

It is more about the movement surrounding him than the man himself.

236 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:08:31pm

re: #227 Alouette

If Randall Terry were President [G-D forbid] he would give Hitler a run for his money.

I'm so sick of these extremists invoking Hitler. If they were around while Hitler was doing his thing, they'd all be happily pitching in.

It's been so overused. Had to suffer through 8 years of the "Bush is Hitler meme" and now of all things they're saying "Obama is Hitler." There's no equal to Hitler and hopefully we will never see another Hitler for the rest of time. I've been seeing a lot of the same thing being done with the KKK where groups are called "just like the KKK." I was watching on show the other night and some guy went off and said that "Greenpeace is just like the KKK!" I just sat there and scratched my head.

237 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:08:46pm

re: #231 ihateronpaul

Alright smart guy, show me an example to the contrary, of a right wing talk show host not going against the DHS report.

Don't like getting called on your exaggerations?

/oh, and that's Mr. Smart Guy to you, Junior.

238 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:09:36pm

re: #211 gtrs

he was extremely infllammatory in the past talking about "TILLER THE BABY KILLER" over and over and over again

You need to link to that claim please.

239 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:09:58pm

re: #203 experiencedtraveller

Apologies for the down ding jcm. I like you a lot. But the "no true scotsman" argument has gone too far. Its become a pithy rebuttal to any defense of Christianity whenever someone claiming to be a Christian is caught behaving satanically. This man was a socio-path and a murderer and he is not a Christian and surely never was a Christian.

I wear a NY Rangers jersey and post on NY Rangers websites. I am not a NY Ranger.

Don't worry, Mandy took questioned Walter's post (I know Walter can take care of himself), just trying to keep things from getting out of hand is all.

I happen to agree with Walter.

Randall and Phelps and others claim to be Christian, our response shouldn't be to merely say they are not Christian.

We need to go much farther, because to everyone outside the faith, they are Christian. All Christians are going to have to deal with it.

I don't know what's in Terry's heart. I do know that he is wrong, Christians need to vociferously decree this type of garbage, both inside the faith and to the world. We must be able to show why he is wrong.

240 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:10:09pm

re: #224 Walter L. Newton

Indeed, as with many religious texts. The problem is that while many believers will quickly say "No no no no no, we surely don't believe THAT any longer," they still have it trapped in with everything they do like. Ten Commandments? In. Deuteronomy? Less so.

241 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:10:10pm

re: #236 Gus 802

It's been so overused. Had to suffer through 8 years of the "Bush is Hitler meme" and now of all things they're saying "Obama is Hitler." There's no equal to Hitler and hopefully we will never see another Hitler for the rest of time. I've been seeing a lot of the same thing being done with the KKK where groups are called "just like the KKK." I was watching on show the other night and some guy went off and said that "Greenpeace is just like the KKK!" I just sat there and scratched my head.

I think to some extent it extends to groups like the ALF that don't attack human beings...they are nowhere near as destructive as racist groups yet are lumped in with them.

242 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:10:38pm

re: #231 ihateronpaul

Alright smart guy, show me an example to the contrary, of a right wing talk show host not going against the DHS report.

Oh, and I don't listen to ALL of them (damn you, full-time employment!), so I would make a horrible research flunky for you.

/But if you still want to hire me, I'm cheap at $120K per annum plus four weeks paid vacation and full benefits including 401(k) and dental.

243 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:11:12pm

re: #237 OldLineTexan

Don't like getting called on your exaggerations?

/oh, and that's Mr. Smart Guy to you, Junior.

I still haven't seen your example. All of the talk show hosts I heard latched on to the DHS story like flies to the lamp.

244 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:11:48pm

re: #225 Iron Fist

It's called "uke".

A fitting name, since at one point, when he had me in a particularly painful wristlock, I thought I was gonna "puke".

/

245 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:12:07pm

re: #243 ihateronpaul

I still haven't seen your example. All of the talk show hosts I heard latched on to the DHS story like flies to the lamp.

Now that's a statement I have no argument with.

/No charge for the help with your rhetoric.

/This time.

246 SpaceJesus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:12:27pm

how much you want to bet he's wearing victoria's secret under that suit?

247 Killgore Trout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:12:55pm

I don't understand AP on some days. Is he doing his job and feeding the idiots what they want or does he really believe this shit?
Tool who said Fox News is “worse than Al Qaeda”: Hey, let’s “quarantine” Fox News’s hate speech
Anyone?

248 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:13:08pm
249 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:13:09pm

re: #230 1SG(ret)

I live in the south and am a member of an Independent Baptist Church. Nothing like this has ever been said or preached where I've been. I still say you paint with a broad brush. But I should have stayed out of the debate, for these threads usually become more about Christian bashing than the subject matter. The Guy is an asshole!

I have heard hours of inflammatory rhetoric coming from southern churches on the radio...threats and guilt, all the bad stuff that happens if you reject Jesus...all the while one person or another was memorizing scripture I was listening to the Stones...am I lost?...am I doomed to the fires of Hell?...am I a bad person?...I'm very comfortable as a heathen and I'll go where they tell me to go after this life...I cannot rise out of the valley and don the armore of the Lord...if I'm fucked so be it...I stand alone with my morality

250 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:13:19pm

re: #246 spacejesus

Now THAT is funny. Damn you spacejesus... damn you!

251 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:13:55pm

re: #246 spacejesus

how much you want to bet he's wearing victoria's secret under that suit?

HARHARHAR!

Pardon me, I have to go thaw out Hell.

252 ihateronpaul  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:14:05pm

re: #245 OldLineTexan

Now that's a statement I have no argument with.

/No charge for the help with your rhetoric.

/This time.

I will freely admit that I sometimes have difficulty wording my thoughts, but I am getting better over time (I hope)

253 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:14:51pm

re: #222 ihateronpaul

Hannity often commits "sins of omissions" by acting like ridiculously wack shit being said never happened.

I can't stand the smug look he gets on his face when he thinks he scored a point over some stupid comment like the the Dijon mustard line. As far as repeating himself, I'd like him to just wear a T shirt with Wright/Ayers printed on it and save his voice.

254 Throbert McGee  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:15:07pm

re: #59 NelsFree

re: #41 Walter L. Newton

By STRICT definition, a Christian is someone who accepts Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, thereby obtaining salvation. Such a person is commended to follow the lesson of His life. Randall Terry is not following the teachings of Jesus by his actions.

The fact that Randall Terry completely sucks at the "living in imitation of Christ" part makes him a really bad Christian, but not a non-Christian.

255 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:15:41pm

re: #240 Lawrior

Indeed, as with many religious texts. The problem is that while many believers will quickly say "No no no no no, we surely don't believe THAT any longer," they still have it trapped in with everything they do like. Ten Commandments? In. Deuteronomy? Less so.

Let's see what the Greek scriptures say about retribution. Paul temporarily blinds the sorcerer Elymas in (Acts 13, 9-12), and what about Ananias and Saphira who were struck dead at Peter’s feet (Acts 5, 5-11).

A person like Terry could certainly show just reason for someone to be harmed or killed by referring to these tales in the Greek scriptures.

256 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:15:57pm

re: #252 ihateronpaul

I will freely admit that I sometimes have difficulty wording my thoughts, but I am getting better over time (I hope)

Hey man, we all have work to do. No hard feelings, OK?

/unless you piss me off again

/

257 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:05pm

re: #254 Throbert McGee

TM ... OT ... you change your avatar all the time! ... what is the new one? ...

258 Pawn of the Oppressor  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:12pm

I'm seeing this shit from the last three days or so, and I'm beginning to think that the human animal is fundamentally flawed at the chemical level.

259 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:28pm

re: #242 OldLineTexan

I'm cheap at $120K per annum

Are those US dollars, or Confederate?

260 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:38pm

re: #255 Walter L. Newton

Let's see what the Greek scriptures say about retribution. Paul temporarily blinds the sorcerer Elymas in (Acts 13, 9-12), and what about Ananias and Saphira who were struck dead at Peter’s feet (Acts 5, 5-11).

A person like Terry could certainly show just reason for someone to be harmed or killed by referring to these tales in the Greek scriptures.

Did Peter use the Holy Handgun of Antioch, or did God get the credit?

261 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:47pm

re: #254 Throbert McGee

The fact that Randall Terry completely sucks at the "living in imitation of Christ" part makes him a really bad Christian, but not a non-Christian.

Maybe he just does the "scourging the moneychangers out of the temple" and "o ye scribes and pharisees vipers burn in hell" thing over and over and over.

262 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:49pm

Like Sister-in-Law tells me, "Some people are good churchgoers, some people are good Christians, and some people are both."


I try to be real nice to her. She's trying to pray me into Heaven. I've told her there's no rush, but I'm not sure she believes me.

263 SpaceJesus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:57pm

re: #251 OldLineTexan

HARHARHAR!

Pardon me, I have to go thaw out Hell.

the video is lot more entertaining the second time around if you realize he's probably wearing women's undergarmets

264 theheat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:16:57pm

Good grief, Randall Terry is the poster boy for atheism. I thank my lucky stars my friends of the religious persuasion don't subscribe to this bullshit.

265 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:17:09pm

re: #259 Occasional Reader

Are those US dollars, or Confederate?

I am not a fan of The Lost Cause.

266 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:17:21pm

re: #257 JacksonTn

TM ... OT ... you change your avatar all the time! ... what is the new one? ...

It is a backwards capital R.
; )

267 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:17:25pm

OLT is ON tonight

268 theheat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:18:36pm

re: #258 Pawn of the Oppressor

Oh, great. Now you've just gone and pissed off the creationists. Nice going.

///

269 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:18:37pm

re: #260 OldLineTexan

I think Peter got the credit, but he gave God an assist.

270 Killgore Trout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:19:07pm

re: #247 Killgore Trout
Silence? Game over.
/You've been defeated by an idiot like Olberman.
//Tea Party!

271 American Sabra  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:19:17pm

re: #239 jcm

I hate to point out the obvious, but it seems we've always expected this of Muslims. There are those Muslims that say the extremists are not a part of them. Do we believe them? Many do not and are completely justified that they shouldn't.

I think you're right. It's important to acknowledge it and tell people the truth about Christianity. However, I think if Christians want this kind of respect and acceptance, they'll have to give it to others also.

272 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:19:30pm

re: #268 theheat

Oh, great. Now you've just gone and pissed off the creationists. Nice going.

///

I'm cool... but you must respect the Turtle stack!

273 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:19:41pm
274 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:20:03pm

re: #265 OldLineTexan

I am not a fan of The Lost Cause.

I thought you lived in The Land of The Lost Cause.

/the Sleestacks shall rise again

275 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:20:13pm

re: #260 OldLineTexan

Did Peter use the Holy Handgun of Antioch, or did God get the credit?

And what did Paul use to blind Elymas? My point being, there is material, both in the Hebrew and Greek scriptures that can be used, rightfully so, to build many kinds of arguments for many points of views. I have heard many a Christian declare the rights to the "gifts" indicated in the Greek scriptures. And that includes all the apostolic powers and privileges.

276 Pawn of the Oppressor  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:20:36pm

re: #268 theheat

Oh, great. Now you've just gone and pissed off the creationists. Nice going.

///

Hey, I'm condemning Darwin too. SELF-IMPROVING ADAPTATIONS MY ASS! NICE GOING CHUCK*!

/*darwin, not our Charles

277 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:20:41pm

re: #267 jamgarr

OLT is ON tonight

Hey, those blood test results are confidential

278 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:20:53pm

re: #238 The Shadow Do

You need to link to that claim please.

Here you go

baby killer

279 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:21:29pm

re: #274 Occasional Reader

I thought you lived in The Land of The Lost Cause.

/the Sleestacks shall rise again

Bill Laimbeer was a Sleestack. True story.

280 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:21:41pm

re: #275 Walter L. Newton

And what did Paul use to blind Elymas? My point being, there is material, both in the Hebrew and Greek scriptures that can be used, rightfully so, to build many kinds of arguments for many points of views. I have heard many a Christian declare the rights to the "gifts" indicated in the Greek scriptures. And that includes all the apostolic powers and privileges.

Did Paul blind Elymas?

But, larger point taken - scripture is misused.

281 1SG(ret)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:22:14pm

re: #249 albusteve

I don't judge you or your beliefs. That's between you and whatever there is after this life (for me thats God). I expect the same from others, unless my personal actions warrant such judgment. His actions and words tell me he's no Christian. I do know on most issues we agree. I except your opinion on this. I don't fall in the same category as this Non-Christian. IMHO

282 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:22:22pm

re: #275 Walter L. Newton

And what did Paul use to blind Elymas? My point being, there is material, both in the Hebrew and Greek scriptures that can be used, rightfully so, to build many kinds of arguments for many points of views. I have heard many a Christian declare the rights to the "gifts" indicated in the Greek scriptures. And that includes all the apostolic powers and privileges.

Oh, and Nels... please don't question me about how much I know about Christianity. A lot of the time, it's a hell of a lot more than most Sunday goers.

283 Pawn of the Oppressor  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:22:25pm

re: #275 Walter L. Newton

And what did Paul use to blind Elymas? My point being, there is material, both in the Hebrew and Greek scriptures that can be used, rightfully so, to build many kinds of arguments for many points of views. I have heard many a Christian declare the rights to the "gifts" indicated in the Greek scriptures. And that includes all the apostolic powers and privileges.

I think what's missing is the oral tradition to explain all these things. That's what I find in Judaism... There's lots of confusing stuff in the Tanakh that is explained by commentary which isn't necessarily part of the required reading. Footnotes, so to speak.

284 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:22:35pm

re: #234 Killgore Trout

Yeesh.
/The only words I have left to criticize the right with are monosyllabic grunts and clicks.

Alan Keyes sounding almost as bad as Randall Terry, but against Obama, not Tiller...

285 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:22:51pm

re: #274 Occasional Reader

I thought you lived in The Land of The Lost Cause.

/the Sleestacks shall rise again

Some Texans (like myself) identify more with 1836 than 1861.

Selective memory? Perhaps.

286 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:23:02pm

re: #281 1SG(ret)

I don't judge you or your beliefs. That's between you and whatever there is after this life (for me thats God). I expect the same from others, unless my personal actions warrant such judgment. His actions and words tell me he's no Christian. I do know on most issues we agree. I except your opinion on this. I don't fall in the same category as this Non-Christian. IMHO

respect

287 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:23:26pm

re: #220 Lawrior

It's not Jesus that's the problem; it's some of his followers that pick and choose the parts they like to justify their actions. The Old Testament is chock full of that can be used as justification for killing if you so choose.

The Law was nailed to the cross with Christ.

288 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:23:33pm

re: #283 Pawn of the Oppressor

I think what's missing is the oral tradition to explain all these things. That's what I find in Judaism... There's lots of confusing stuff in the Tanakh that is explained by commentary which isn't necessarily part of the required reading. Footnotes, so to speak.

The Oral Tradition = the User's Manual

289 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:23:50pm

re: #285 OldLineTexan

I know I do.

290 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:24:01pm

re: #283 Pawn of the Oppressor

I think what's missing is the oral tradition to explain all these things. That's what I find in Judaism... There's lots of confusing stuff in the Tanakh that is explained by commentary which isn't necessarily part of the required reading. Footnotes, so to speak.

Talmudic writings? I find them fascinating.

291 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:24:36pm

re: #220 Lawrior

It's not Jesus that's the problem; it's some of his followers that pick and choose the parts they like to justify their actions. The Old Testament is chock full of that can be used as justification for killing if you so choose.


INcorrect. The OT references to killing of Jebusites was for a particular people at a particular time and place. God allowed his chosen people to clear the way to the Promised land. After that, the killing was to end. Sounds like the usual "out of context" stuff.
Jesus, entirely in the New Testament, said, "I have not come to abolish the law or the prophets, but to fulfill them". During this same sermon (The Beatitudes), He said, "let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in Heaven". So, salvation causes you to choose a different path. The closer you follow that path, the greater your "light" shines to others.
Walter, I shall pray for you to have a non-contentious conversation with a Christian who can clear up some of your misperceptions. Maybe some of your anger issues can be resolved.
Well, got to call it a night. "It's a night!" There, I feel better now.

292 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:24:37pm

How's about a Bill of Particulars from folks like us?

293 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:25:03pm

re: #280 OldLineTexan

Did Paul blind Elymas?

But, larger point taken - scripture is misused.

Paul was the vessel in which God delivered his message to Elymas, by having him blinded. Terry could as easily claim to be the vessel of God in his fight against abortion.

Yes, larger point, same as mine.

294 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:26:13pm

re: #271 American Sabra

I hate to point out the obvious, but it seems we've always expected this of Muslims. There are those Muslims that say the extremists are not a part of them. Do we believe them? Many do not and are completely justified that they shouldn't.

I think you're right. It's important to acknowledge it and tell people the truth about Christianity. However, I think if Christians want this kind of respect and acceptance, they'll have to give it to others also.

I hear you...

We expect Islam (collectively) to own up to it's short comings. There are two few Yahudi Jasser's, and too many are silent.

I won't be silent, I'll earn my respect.

And absolutely we must give others and their choices respect. The bottom line is God gave us free will, who are we to judge they're choice? That's a spiritual matter for them, I however will judge they're actions however in this realm murder is wrong, and defending it wrong.

Terry's actions and words are wrong, and in no way justifiable.

295 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:26:24pm

re: #293 Walter L. Newton

Paul was the vessel in which God delivered his message to Elymas, by having him blinded. Terry could as easily claim to be the vessel of God in his fight against abortion.

Yes, larger point, same as mine.

Let Terry prove it.

/yes, I am from an adulterous generation

296 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:26:45pm

re: #293 Walter L. Newton

Paul was the vessel in which God delivered his message to Elymas, by having him blinded. Terry could as easily claim to be the vessel of God in his fight against abortion.

Yes, larger point, same as mine.

I thought that it was Paul who put the lime in the coconut and mixed it all together.

297 Pawn of the Oppressor  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:26:46pm

re: #290 Truck Monkey

Talmudic writings? I find them fascinating.

That's what I love about Judaism. There's always an argument. Any detail, no matter how small, you can bet that two rabbis (or scholars, if you prefer) have debated about it over lunch. And whether it was six years ago or six hundred, somebody probably wrote the argument down and expanded up on it!

298 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:26:48pm

re: #283 Pawn of the Oppressor

I think what's missing is the oral tradition to explain all these things. That's what I find in Judaism... There's lots of confusing stuff in the Tanakh that is explained by commentary which isn't necessarily part of the required reading. Footnotes, so to speak.

The oral tradition is equivalent to explaining the problems, which is expected considering the contradictions available to work with.

299 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:26:53pm

re: #278 avanti

Here you go

baby killer

Why was he going after Gov. Kathleen Sebelius? For not stopping Dr. George Tiller from practicing in Kansas? She was preceded by Gov. Mike Leavitt and he essentially acted as his successor. No wait. I think I figured it out. Sebelius is a Democrat and Leavitt is a Republican.

300 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:26:54pm

re: #295 OldLineTexan

Let Terry prove it.

/yes, I am from an adulterous generation

"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit." (Matthew 7: 16-17)

301 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:27:18pm

re: #291 NelsFree

Well, it's a good thing God loved the Jebusites so much he hasted their return to him. I am sure that they felt quite lucky at their early return.

302 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:27:47pm

re: #297 Pawn of the Oppressor

That's what I love about Judaism. There's always an argument. Any detail, no matter how small, you can bet that two rabbis (or scholars, if you prefer) have debated about it over lunch. And whether it was six years ago or six hundred, somebody probably wrote the argument down and expanded up on it!

And if two Rabbis debated it, they will walk away with three opinions.

303 capitalist piglet  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:28:04pm

re: #230 1SG(ret)

I live in the south and am a member of an Independent Baptist Church. Nothing like this has ever been said or preached where I've been. I still say you paint with a broad brush. But I should have stayed out of the debate, for these threads usually become more about Christian bashing than the subject matter. The Guy is an asshole!

I don't live in the South, but I want to give your post some emphasis by saying I've never been to a church that preached hatred of anyone, for any reason.

Christianity is not bad. People (including pastors) are sometimes bad. Sadly, what I've discovered watching this play out online is that there is a dark side to a lot of religious people that needs to be straightened out, quite possibly with a swift kick in the ass.

This is no reflection on Christ. It is a nasty, nasty reflection on a particular segment of His followers, however. I have been a Christian for twenty-one years, and I don't recognize these people. I want no part of this "pro-life" scene.

304 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:28:14pm

re: #301 Lawrior

Well, it's a good thing God loved the Jebusites so much he hasted their return to him. I am sure that they felt quite lucky at their early return.

Luckily, the Jeebusites were out of town.

305 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:28:47pm

re: #282 Walter L. Newton

Oh, and Nels... please don't question me about how much I know about Christianity. A lot of the time, it's a hell of a lot more than most Sunday goers.

Heh. Those Jehovah's Witnesses may have some odd ideas, but they'll learn ya yer scripture, won't they?

306 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:29:31pm

re: #291 NelsFree

Walter, I shall pray for you to have a non-contentious conversation with a Christian who can clear up some of your misperceptions. Maybe some of your anger issues can be resolved... There, I feel better now

Thanks... (classic rhetoric :)
/

307 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:29:39pm

re: #218 Killgore Trout

I'm happy to see the wheels coming off the cart on that one too.

Homosexuality is spread out all over the place.

308 Dianna  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:29:51pm

I absolutely agree with Charles on this. I thought this paragraph:

This is domestic terrorism, in your face. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

entirely appropriate and very well said.

309 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:30:11pm

re: #307 MandyManners

Homosexuality is spread out all over the place.

Uh ...

/oh, forget it

310 1SG(ret)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:30:13pm

re: #303 capitalist piglet

Said better than I! I'm with you!

311 vxbush  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:30:14pm

re: #303 capitalist piglet

I don't live in the South, but I want to give your post some emphasis by saying I've never been to a church that preached hatred of anyone, for any reason.

Christianity is not bad. People (including pastors) are sometimes bad. Sadly, what I've discovered watching this play out online is that there is a dark side to a lot of religious people that needs to be straightened out, quite possibly with a swift kick in the ass.

This is no reflection on Christ. It is a nasty, nasty reflection on a particular segment of His followers, however. I have been a Christian for twenty-one years, and I don't recognize these people. I want no part of this "pro-life" scene.

Ding, ding, and super-ding.

312 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:30:39pm

re: #299 Gus 802

Why was he going after Gov. Kathleen Sebelius? For not stopping Dr. George Tiller from practicing in Kansas? She was preceded by Gov. Mike Leavitt and he essentially acted as his successor. No wait. I think I figured it out. Sebelius is a Democrat and Leavitt is a Republican.

Sebellius vetoed their bill, the legislature couldn't override. The bill would have outlawed late term abortions in Kansas.

313 Dianna  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:30:57pm

re: #307 MandyManners

Homosexuality is spread out all over the place.

Well, yes.

I have a bad feeling about this...

314 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:31:25pm

re: #299 Gus 802

Why was he going after Gov. Kathleen Sebelius? For not stopping Dr. George Tiller from practicing in Kansas? She was preceded by Gov. Mike Leavitt and he essentially acted as his successor. No wait. I think I figured it out. Sebelius is a Democrat and Leavitt is a Republican.

She vetoed the late term abortion ban.

Veto.

315 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:31:38pm

re: #312 Thanos

Sebellius vetoed their bill, the legislature couldn't override. The bill would have outlawed late term abortions in Kansas.

Ah, OK. But they didn't present a bill prior to her being in office. Si?

316 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:31:53pm

re: #295 OldLineTexan

Let Terry prove it.

/yes, I am from an adulterous generation


All generations are adulterous.

317 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:32:22pm

re: #314 avanti

She vetoed the late term abortion ban.

Veto.

Muchas gracias.

318 Dianna  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:32:49pm

re: #312 Thanos

Sebellius vetoed their bill, the legislature couldn't override. The bill would have outlawed late term abortions in Kansas.

And the legislature didn't override says to me that they thought their constituents didn't want them to? Or am I missing something?

319 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:33:05pm

re: #291 NelsFree

The OT references to killing of Jebusites was for a particular people at a particular time and place. God allowed his chosen people to clear the way to the Promised land. After that, the killing was to end. Sounds like the usual "out of context" stuff.

So it was His Divine Collateral Damage?

Kind of hard to reconcile with an (allegedly) omnipotent being, IMHO.

320 HoosierHoops  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:33:19pm

re: #316 MandyManners

All generations are adulterous.

I'm just glad all generations figured out Sex..Otherwise We wouldn't be here..
Hey Sex!

321 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:33:26pm

re: #315 Gus 802

Ah, OK. But they didn't present a bill prior to her being in office. Si?

No they didn't. They did over ride her concealed carry veto which was cool.

322 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:33:48pm

WE'RE NOT FUCKING SPECIAL, FOLKS! MASSIVELY BAD SHIT HAS HAPPENED THROUGHOUT HISTORY!

323 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:34:02pm

re: #305 razorbacker

Heh. Those Jehovah's Witnesses may have some odd ideas, but they'll learn ya yer scripture, won't they?

They are as problematic as all the rest. One thing I did learn, was to actually study, find out, from many points of view what has been argued for the last 2000 years. I have a pretty good knowledge of what and where something is in the Hebrew and Greek scriptures.

And, bye the way, your little slam holds no water. I am an atheist, have been most of my life, but, at the same time, I've searched, and I have associated myself with many more sects and flavors of Christianity and Judaism than most people, so, I consider myself at least well-rounded, if not well armed with some knowledge.

Of course, I know, that makes me a gnostic. Well, I have a good education in regards to that too.

So, what's you point ranger.

324 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:34:07pm

re: #318 Dianna

And the legislature didn't override says to me that they thought their constituents didn't want them to? Or am I missing something?

That's right. There's some serious backlash against this crap in Kansas.

325 J.S.  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:34:18pm

re: #302 Walter L. Newton

Talmudic thought, imo, is addictive...(as soon as one arrives at the proposition: "Why, that settles it!" you'll read an argumentative dispensation which will shatter that "naive" point of view...It's akin to a kaleidoscope...but infinitely fascinating...)

326 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:34:27pm

re: #321 Thanos

No they didn't. They did over ride her concealed carry veto which was cool.

Interesting. Well, that's good.

327 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:35:07pm
328 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:35:35pm

The stuff you can find on youtube...

"banned 7-up commercial"

329 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:36:06pm

re: #322 MandyManners

WE'RE NOT FUCKING SPECIAL, FOLKS! MASSIVELY BAD SHIT HAS HAPPENED THROUGHOUT HISTORY!

Whimper...
but not to me...
WHAAA!

///

330 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:36:58pm

re: #307 MandyManners

Homosexuality is spread out all over the place.

Get your mind out of the gutter, razorbacker. You know good and well it'll be the 'fluffer' definition kerfluffle all over again.

331 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:37:20pm
332 theheat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:37:44pm

From CNN, Abortion Providers Face Serious Threats:

Chetry: This is something that’s been roundly denounced, this shooting, by pro-life activists as well, including Pat Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition. He said, “It’s tragic. The probability is that someone who opposed abortion did this. The reason we are pro-life is because we hate violence on any level. I don’t know of one legitimate pro-life leader who would not unequivocally condemn this.”

Derzis: That’s a lie.

Chetry: You don’t believe those words?

Derzis: Absolutely not. These people…the rhetoric these people espouse calls for our deaths every day in front of these clinics. He’s saying that only because of the timing of this particular shooting. Randal Terry, you also hear him calling George Tiller a mass-murderer. They have websites, they have wanted posters. These people have put the target on our chest, on our backs.

333 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:37:47pm

re: #322 MandyManners

WE'RE NOT FUCKING SPECIAL, FOLKS! MASSIVELY BAD SHIT HAS HAPPENED THROUGHOUT HISTORY!

Even worse shit has happened.

334 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:38:52pm

re: #325 J.S.

Talmudic thought, imo, is addictive...(as soon as one arrives at the proposition: "Why, that settles it!" you'll read an argumentative dispensation which will shatter that "naive" point of view...It's akin to a kaleidoscope...but infinitely fascinating...)

I do find it makes for interesting story telling. One of my plays "High Crimes and Misdemeanors," based on 3 of 10 stories in Joanne Greenberg's book of the same name, is based on Talmudic thoughts and arguments.

The show had a wonderful run in 2000 here in Denver and I had the cast talk to a number of local Talmudic scholars to give them the flavor of the thinking and concepts. Of course, the stories are serious and funny, at the same time, which is sometimes the real joy in a rabbinic tale.

335 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:39:21pm

re: #328 Dar ul Harbarian
If you think that's weird, try this commercial for WTF?

336 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:39:37pm

re: #323 Walter L. Newton

They are as problematic as all the rest. One thing I did learn, was to actually study, find out, from many points of view what has been argued for the last 2000 years. I have a pretty good knowledge of what and where something is in the Hebrew and Greek scriptures.

And, bye the way, your little slam holds no water. I am an atheist, have been most of my life, but, at the same time, I've searched, and I have associated myself with many more sects and flavors of Christianity and Judaism than most people, so, I consider myself at least well-rounded, if not well armed with some knowledge.

Of course, I know, that makes me a gnostic. Well, I have a good education in regards to that too.

So, what's you point ranger.

Lighten up Francis. I was raised JW. I liked the Bible study. I just couldn't stay true to the church.

337 lawhawk  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:40:18pm

re: #297 Pawn of the Oppressor

Judaism has a long history of examining arguments. From the Torah you got the Talmud and the Gemorah. Mishneh. Toseftot. Analyses and treatises examining issues from every angle. Each greatly expanded the knowledge and understanding of Jewish law.

And then along came Rabbi Yosef Caro, who wrote the the Shulchan Aruch (which is the condensed version of the arguments from the above, because when you start having to build entire libraries to discuss Jewish law, the average Moshe or Sarah needed something easier to carry around to be able to follow the law)...

338 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:40:37pm
339 American Sabra  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:42:05pm

re: #297 Pawn of the Oppressor

Um... what's that saying? You have two Jews in a room, you have three opinions?

340 1SG(ret)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:42:10pm

re: #327 Iron Fist

It only takes a few to paint all as believing as they do! They get all the face time. Just the way of the beast!

341 ArchangelMichael  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:42:33pm

re: #333 Gus 802

Even worse shit has happened.

Shit never stops happening too.

342 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:43:02pm

re: #336 razorbacker

Lighten up Francis. I was raised JW. I liked the Bible study. I just couldn't stay true to the church.

Sorry, I thought you were slamming me about it. I figured you tagged me by the "group language," in regards to "Hebrew and Greek scripture," but, that is also the why many scholars refer to the old and new testaments.

Yes, as I have stated here before, I did belong to that group, for 5 years, and many other groups. And yes, they taught me to really look into the history of the scriptures. And at the same time, that was a problem, because after a while, they too became victims to my studies. Ha.

343 Eclectic Infidel  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:43:10pm

Simply put, this is the face of the enemy.

344 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:43:37pm

re: #255 Walter L. Newton

Let's see what the Greek scriptures say about retribution. Paul temporarily blinds the sorcerer Elymas in (Acts 13, 9-12), and what about Ananias and Saphira who were struck dead at Peter’s feet (Acts 5, 5-11).

Walter, Walter. CLASSIC out of context quotations! I've got my Bible right here (did I mention that I'm praying for you? Good.) Saul and Barnabas were called by the Holy Spirit to travel on Mission. While on Cyprus, the met Bar-Jesus. He was a false prophet and a sorcerer who worked for the Roman Proconsul. Saul (known as Paul, from the Road to Damascus incident), told the false prophet,"you are a child of the Devil and an enemy of everything that is right! You are full of all kinds of deceit and trickery. Will you never stop perverting the right ways of the Lord? Now the hand of the Lord is against you. You are going to be blind, and for a time you will be unable to see the light of the sun." The Proconsul, seeing this, believed in the Lord. Later on, Bar-Jesus regained his sight.
Ananias and Saphira sold some land and took the money to donate it to the church. They held some back. When asked, each lied about it and were struck dead. The moral of the story: don't lie to God.
Walter, you really need to find the good news in the Bible. This attempt to pervert the Holy Bible is beneath you. You know better than to try to fool folks with incomplete scripture. Now, go and sit on the porch swing and think about what you did!
No fruit cup for you! (I'm still praying for you, though)

345 J.D.  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:43:58pm

re: #335 Lawrior

3:44 of my life was spent there.
I can't believe I watched the whole thing.

346 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:44:02pm

re: #338 Iron Fist

You still can't get shit for ammo around here. I haven't seen .45 or 9mm JHPs available for months.

I keep telling you...

Blue.

State.

America.

That's where the ammo availability is at. (Apparently.)

(Picked up Glaser Pow-R-Ball .45acp just a few weeks ago... no shortage at all.)

347 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:44:08pm
348 theheat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:44:20pm

re: #341 ArchangelMichael

Here's some reading you might enjoy. There seems to be no end to shit. None.

349 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:44:36pm

re: #278 avanti

Here you go

baby killer

Imagine my surprise when your Kos link crashed my old conservative browser, forcing me to search for a transcript.

BILL O'REILLY, HOST: In the "Impact" segment tonight, confronting the Kansas doctor known as “Tiller the baby killer.” Dr. George Tiller has performed thousands of late-term abortions for millions of dollars. And some Kansas authorities suspect he is violating the law, because some of the women involved do not have serious medical reasons for the late-term abortions. Psychiatrist Paul McHugh was asked by former Kansas Attorney General Phil Klein to examine some of Tiller's records


Is this your reference? Huh?

350 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:44:57pm

re: #341 ArchangelMichael

Shit never stops happening too.

There's a bumper sticker for that. /

351 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:45:07pm

re: #346 Occasional Reader

I keep telling you...

Blue.

State.

America.

That's where the ammo availability is at. (Apparently.)

(Picked up Glaser Pow-R-Ball .45acp just a few weeks ago... no shortage at all.)

It's a hell of a long way THERE from HERE, though.

352 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:45:56pm

re: #338 Iron Fist

That's good news. One of the rumors that was making the rounds here was that Obama was going to try and go after concealed carry laws. So far, nothing.

Let's hope he leaves it that way.

(You still can't get shit for ammo around here. I haven't seen .45 or 9mm JHPs available for months. Wally World gets trucks in every day, and I usually check two or three times a week. Nada)

The left won this last election by putting aside their anti gun crowd and running center right candidates in several previously solid R states. I don't know why we can't put some of our "no sale to the american public stances" aside awhile like they are.

353 J.S.  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:06pm

re: #337 lawhawk

there are also -- dare I say? -- jokes...and they run throughout Judaic literature..Talmud/Torah (some hilarious...but, I don't think most people "get" the jokes...the majority take everything far too literally/seriously..)

354 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:09pm

re: #335 Lawrior

If you think that's weird, try this commercial for WTF?

WTF? That stuff looks like the goop that came out of the "baby" in Eraserhead.

355 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:12pm
356 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:14pm

re: #345 J.D.

In all fairness, I warned you up front it was going to be weird. There are several other commercials that get just as weird, if not more so.

357 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:21pm

Just can't get over the vast outpouring of publicity about the shooting of those 2 American soldiers today.

Simply makes ya proud of the untiring effort of the MFMSM, shouting it from the rooftops, as it were.

I fucking look forward to continued coverage of all facets of the story.

358 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:50pm

re: #342 Walter L. Newton

At least you had a better reason for leaving than I.

Sex, drugs, and rock-and-roll just didn't jibe with their teachings. Mighty tempting to a young fellow like me, though. And I can resist just about anything except temptation.

359 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:53pm

re: #307 MandyManners

Homosexuality is spread out all over the place.

Well somebody better go pick it all up if they don't want it to get ruined, I hear it's gonna rain soon.
/

360 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:46:53pm

re: #346 Occasional Reader

Pow-R-Ball .45acp

One in 54.8 million odds of causing a lawsuit?

/

361 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:47:25pm

re: #346 Occasional Reader

I keep telling you...

Blue.

State.

America.

That's where the ammo availability is at. (Apparently.)

(Picked up Glaser Pow-R-Ball .45acp just a few weeks ago... no shortage at all.)

From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I shall not put.
; )

362 gtrs  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:47:49pm

re: #299 Gus 802 leavitt was governor of utah

363 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:48:17pm

re: #357 irongrampa

Just can't get over the vast outpouring of publicity about the shooting of those 2 American soldiers today.

Simply makes ya proud of the untiring effort of the MFMSM, shouting it from the rooftops, as it were.

I fucking look forward to continued coverage of all facets of the story.

There's a single AP story, it's being reprinted quite a few places, but it's still just one story retreaded.

364 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:48:51pm
365 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:49:03pm

re: #362 gtrs

leavitt was governor of utah

Clicked on the wrong link.

Bill Graves!

/Doh

366 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:49:13pm

re: #349 The Shadow Do

Is this your reference? Huh?

That's the way it's set up. Lefties are more tech savvy, have fast, modern computers and we can crash all the conservatives on their five year old boxes. :)

367 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:49:14pm

re: #363 Thanos

There's a single AP story, it's being reprinted quite a few places, but it's still just one story retreaded.

They want to get all the facts straight so the story isn't used for partisan gain.

/

368 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:49:14pm

Kotaro Oshio Hard Rain Montreaux 2002

369 1SG(ret)  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:49:53pm

re: #347 Iron Fist

True and with that, I'm leaving so I don't see Tuesday at 12:01. I'ts usually better seen no earlier than 0 dark thirty. That's usually around 5am for you non-mil types.
Later All!

370 J.D.  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:49:56pm

re: #356 Lawrior
In all fairness, you did.

371 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:49:57pm

re: #344 NelsFree

Walter, Walter. CLASSIC out of context quotations! I've got my Bible right here (did I mention that I'm praying for you? Good.) Saul and Barnabas were called by the Holy Spirit to travel on Mission. While on Cyprus, the met Bar-Jesus. He was a false prophet and a sorcerer who worked for the Roman Proconsul. Saul (known as Paul, from the Road to Damascus incident), told the false prophet,"you are a child of the Devil and an enemy of everything that is right! You are full of all kinds of deceit and trickery. Will you never stop perverting the right ways of the Lord? Now the hand of the Lord is against you. You are going to be blind, and for a time you will be unable to see the light of the sun." The Proconsul, seeing this, believed in the Lord. Later on, Bar-Jesus regained his sight.
Ananias and Saphira sold some land and took the money to donate it to the church. They held some back. When asked, each lied about it and were struck dead. The moral of the story: don't lie to God.
Walter, you really need to find the good news in the Bible. This attempt to pervert the Holy Bible is beneath you. You know better than to try to fool folks with incomplete scripture. Now, go and sit on the porch swing and think about what you did!
No fruit cup for you! (I'm still praying for you, though)

I thought you went to bed. It's not nice to lie to mother nature.

The moral of the story is this. Many pastors and preachers, especially of the fundamentalist school, fully take the apostolic gifts and promises of being "filled" to heart, and believe that they are bound by the same mission as the apostles, and everything that it encompasses.

Ergo, some take it to all the extremes that can be devised, praying for recovery instead of giving medical care, or other crimes such as Terry praying for the death and destruction of abortion doctors. And this goes on and on.

So, if you find comfort in the scriptures, good for you, and I mean that, really. But, there are many more way to look at the scriptures than YOUR way, and people do, all the time, and they justify all sorts of things.

Your way is only one way to look at it.

Now, beddy-bye.

372 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:50:02pm

re: #366 avanti

That's the way it's set up. Lefties are more tech savvy, have fast, modern computers and we can crash all the conservatives on their five year old boxes. :)

Except for the fools in the trees.

/

373 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:50:10pm

re: #366 avanti

That's the way it's set up. Lefties are more tech savvy, have fast, modern computers and we can crash all the conservatives on their five year old boxes. :)

and good old mom pays for it all, plus the Twinkies...such a deal

374 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:50:12pm

Moral equivalence between Islam and Operation Rescue puzzles me

375 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:50:39pm
376 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:50:53pm

re: #339 American Sabra

Um... what's that saying? You have two Jews in a room, you have three opinions?

There was a Jew living all alone on a desert island. On the island were two synagogues--the one he went to, and the other one he wouldn't set foot in.

377 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:51:11pm

re: #351 OldLineTexan

It's a hell of a long way THERE from HERE, though.

Nonsense. You just need to fly over the... er... flyover. And, here you are.

378 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:51:35pm

re: #366 avanti

That's the way it's set up. Lefties are more tech savvy, have fast, modern computers and we can crash all the conservatives on their five year old boxes. :)

Well done then. I am buying a new 'puter tomorrow by the way. Watch out!

379 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:51:35pm
380 Dianna  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:51:39pm

re: #374 MandyManners

Moral equivalence between Islam and Operation Rescue puzzles me

Why? It's the same old problem, surely.

381 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:51:48pm

re: #353 J.S.

there are also -- dare I say? -- jokes...and they run throughout Judaic literature..Talmud/Torah (some hilarious...but, I don't think most people "get" the jokes...the majority take everything far too literally/seriously..)

A rabbi was very sick and the only hospital that had any empty beds was the local Catholic hospital. His nurse was a nun from the local convent. One day she came into his room and noticed that the crucifix that normally hung on the wall over his bed was missing. She asked him good-naturedly, "Rabbi, have you done something with the crucifix?" "Oh, sister," chuckled the rabbi, "I just figured one suffering Jew in this room was enough."

382 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:52:03pm

re: #377 Occasional Reader

Nonsense. You just need to fly over the... er... flyover. And, here you are.

And just how do I get my purchases HOME? HMMM?

/

383 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:52:21pm

re: #371 Walter L. Newton

Walter,

(((Walter)))

384 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:52:36pm

re: #355 Iron Fist

Yeah, you've got ammo, but what will you shoot it with?

Con mi bebe, pinche gringo!

385 NukeAtomrod  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:52:37pm

Randall Terry is wrong when he says "[Tiller] reaped what he sowed.” And it does appear he has sympathies for Tiller's murderer. As a whole, he speech is disgusting.

One caveat though: He is correct that Anti-Abortion activists and people like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and the media as a whole should not be blamed for Tiller's murder simply because they presented evidence that abortion is barbaric and that Tiller performed many late-term abortions.

NO ONE should applaud Tiller's murder or make a hero of his murderer. NO ONE needs to present evidence that vigilantism or premeditated murder are wrong.

386 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:52:38pm

re: #363 Thanos

Has the WH had anything to say? Don't know for sure, but haven't heard of any statement.

387 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:53:14pm

re: #374 MandyManners

why?...they are both religion driven

388 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:53:22pm

re: #372 OldLineTexan

Except for the fools in the trees.

/

Or the Freegans in dumpsters.

389 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:53:31pm

re: #381 Walter L. Newton

A rabbi was very sick and the only hospital that had any empty beds was the local Catholic hospital. His nurse was a nun from the local convent. One day she came into his room and noticed that the crucifix that normally hung on the wall over his bed was missing. She asked him good-naturedly, "Rabbi, have you done something with the crucifix?" "Oh, sister," chuckled the rabbi, "I just figured one suffering Jew in this room was enough."

"I'm tired and thirsty," says the Frenchman. "I must have wine."
"I'm tired and thirsty," says the German. "I must have beer."
"I'm tired and thirsty," says the Jew. "I must have diabetes."

390 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:53:44pm

re: #379 taxfreekiller

snow tonight, tomorrow, Wed. and Thur. Mt. Wood Montana, just west of Red Lodge Mt. low temp. 24 F to 19 F
[Link: www.nws.noaa.gov...]

No sun spots, no nuke fuel for Al Gore's fraud,

what's a fraud to do?

Al Gore is to nuts for words ... IMO

Snow above 8000 feet tomorrow night (Tues) in the Rockies in Colorado. I'll be at my girlfriends at 7500. I guess I'll be alright.

391 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:54:23pm

re: #386 irongrampa

Has the WH had anything to say? Don't know for sure, but haven't heard of any statement.

don't expect alot...there is little to be said officially

392 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:54:47pm

re: #388 jcm

Or the Freegans in dumpsters.

Ragpickers are fun people.

I would definitely party with them.

393 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:54:51pm

re: #383 MandyManners

Walter,

(((Walter)))

Er, thanks. I'm not going to bed though, that beddy-bye was for Nelsfree. But I do thank you for the hugs.

394 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:55:10pm

Helpless Helpless ...

395 NelsFree  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:55:44pm

re: #282 Walter L. Newton

Oh, and Nels... please don't question me about how much I know about Christianity. A lot of the time, it's a hell of a lot more than most Sunday goers.


My Dear Co-poster Walter,

I gain much comfort in the knowledge that you have no right to tell me what to do. Based on what you have typed tonight, I question your knowledge of Christianity as adequate to be competent. You just have a "glass half empty" approach to this. Since you said you are an Atheist, I think you are finding just enough quotes to justify your perspective. There is a lot of good in there which you seem to choose to deliberately ignore. Well, I'm still praying for you. I've got to go beddiebye now. Weet dreams, Walter.

396 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:55:48pm

Dentist converts to Judaism for the jokes. Best. Seinfeld. Episode. Ever.

397 Eclectic Infidel  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:56:18pm

re: #115 Gus 802

In the end of that video Randall Terry compares Barack Obama to Adolph Hitler.

It's curious that the leftists tend to equate what they perceive to be "oppressive" leaders or governments with Hitler or the Nazis, too.

The 'common thread' of extremists, I suppose.

398 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:56:32pm

To me, the lack of sunspots is God's way of saying "Albert!"

399 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:56:33pm

re: #386 irongrampa

Has the WH had anything to say? Don't know for sure, but haven't heard of any statement.

You won't hear a peep about this with the Saudi - Egypt trip coming up.

400 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:56:42pm

re: #394 JacksonTn

Gimme back my sideburns.

/

Thanks for the Neil. My favorite moonbat.

401 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:56:53pm

re: #378 The Shadow Do

Well done then. I am buying a new 'puter tomorrow by the way. Watch out!

May I have your name and social # to pass on to the One please. :)

402 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:57:01pm

re: #395 NelsFree

My Dear Co-poster Walter,

I gain much comfort in the knowledge that you have no right to tell me what to do. Based on what you have typed tonight, I question your knowledge of Christianity as adequate to be competent. You just have a "glass half empty" approach to this. Since you said you are an Atheist, I think you are finding just enough quotes to justify your perspective. There is a lot of good in there which you seem to choose to deliberately ignore. Well, I'm still praying for you. I've got to go beddiebye now. Weet dreams, Walter.

whoa...what about my empty soul?

403 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:57:17pm
404 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:57:43pm

re: #389 Alouette

"I'm tired and thirsty," says the Frenchman. "I must have wine."
"I'm tired and thirsty," says the German. "I must have beer."
"I'm tired and thirsty," says the Jew. "I must have diabetes."

(from "Things in Their Season" the 3rd story in my play "High Crimes and Misdemeanors") for you pleasure...

I will tell you a story that I heard. Once there was a man, very much like myself, who wanted to serve God. He was very puffed up and spent his days giving advice to everyone. One day this man passed through a market place where the Baal Shem Tov stood with a crowd, speaking to the hearts of his listeners. This man heard the Baal Shem Tov say, "God wants the heart." So thinking that he had a new bit of wisdom that could be used to his advantage, he ran home to his wife and ordered her to stew up a cows heart. She did his bidding and then he took the heart to the synagogue and placed it into the Holy Ark where the Torah scrolls are kept. A few days later he returned to find the heart was gone. He rejoiced thinking that he had found a new way to please God, which no one else knew about. And so he continued this practice, certain that he was storing up his riches in the Book of Life. Little did he realize that for many years the poor synagogue beadle had not been able to afford meat for his family! Now the beadle’s prayers were answered. He found a meal delivered almost every night right from God’s open hand.

405 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:57:56pm

re: #399 Thanos

Have to wonder how THAT will go down with the military.

406 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:58:01pm

re: #402 albusteve

whoa...what about my empty soul?

You and me ... the Freegans event ... we will have a fucking BLAST

407 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:58:28pm

re: #386 irongrampa

Has the WH had anything to say? Don't know for sure, but haven't heard of any statement.

Seriously, what can he say? We don't need the POTUS flapping his yap about every murder in America.

408 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:58:29pm

re: #400 OldLineTexan

Gimme back my sideburns.

/

Thanks for the Neil. My favorite moonbat.


I knew I liked you! (BTW he daughter was a backup dancer for Neil - yes he had dancers)

409 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:58:31pm

re: #402 albusteve

whoa...what about my empty soul?

I own it Steve... forget it... it's toast LOL :)

410 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:58:58pm
411 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:59:09pm

re: #406 OldLineTexan

You and me ... the Freegans event ... we will have a fucking BLAST

I'm IN bro!...I can redeem myself, I KNOW it!

412 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:59:35pm

re: #383 MandyManners

KHAAN!

Unless you were referencing Sunn O)))

413 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:59:42pm

re: #407 razorbacker

I think you forgot the sarc tag?

414 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:59:43pm

re: #409 Walter L. Newton

Walter: Not sure you saw this.

415 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:59:50pm

re: #395 NelsFree

My Dear Co-poster Walter,

I gain much comfort in the knowledge that you have no right to tell me what to do. Based on what you have typed tonight, I question your knowledge of Christianity as adequate to be competent. You just have a "glass half empty" approach to this. Since you said you are an Atheist, I think you are finding just enough quotes to justify your perspective. There is a lot of good in there which you seem to choose to deliberately ignore. Well, I'm still praying for you. I've got to go beddiebye now. Weet dreams, Walter.

Thanks.

416 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 7:59:59pm

re: #411 albusteve

I'm IN bro!...I can redeem myself, I KNOW it!

albusteve ... heathen ... drink! ...

417 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:05pm

re: #401 avanti

May I have your name and social # to pass on to the One please. :)

No, I shall remain in the shadows. Beware.
Bwahahahaha...

418 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:15pm

re: #404 Walter L. Newton

(from "Things in Their Season" the 3rd story in my play "High Crimes and Misdemeanors") for you pleasure...

I will tell you a story that I heard. Once there was a man, very much like myself, who wanted to serve God. He was very puffed up and spent his days giving advice to everyone. One day this man passed through a market place where the Baal Shem Tov stood with a crowd, speaking to the hearts of his listeners. This man heard the Baal Shem Tov say, "God wants the heart." So thinking that he had a new bit of wisdom that could be used to his advantage, he ran home to his wife and ordered her to stew up a cows heart. She did his bidding and then he took the heart to the synagogue and placed it into the Holy Ark where the Torah scrolls are kept. A few days later he returned to find the heart was gone. He rejoiced thinking that he had found a new way to please God, which no one else knew about. And so he continued this practice, certain that he was storing up his riches in the Book of Life. Little did he realize that for many years the poor synagogue beadle had not been able to afford meat for his family! Now the beadle’s prayers were answered. He found a meal delivered almost every night right from God’s open hand.

When he went to put the cow's heart in the aron kodesh, he found a note saying, "Next time, send brisket!"

419 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:18pm

re: #408 jamgarr

I knew I liked you! (BTW he daughter was a backup dancer for Neil - yes he had dancers)

I only saw International Harvester at Gilley's and "Second Best Garage Band in the World" at The Summit.

No dancers. :(

420 Truck Monkey  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:28pm

A Priest and a Rabbi were, by coincidence, sitting next to each other on a long flight.

About an hour passes and not a single word was exchanged by the two men. Finally, the Priest turns to the Rabbi and says, "Rabbi, do you mind if I ask you a personal question"? The Rabbi said, "Of course, you may."

"I understand that many of you Jewish people, especially Rabbis, keep kosher and, as such, don't eat things like bacon or ham". The Rabbi acknowledged that. "Haven't you ever even tasted bacon or ham?", asked the Priest.

The Rabbi explained, "Many years ago, I was a visiting Rabbi in a small town in the middle of nowhere and found myself in a diner one Sunday morning. There was no one around so I ordered bacon and eggs. It was quite good but that was the only time that ever happened."

After some time, the Rabbi turned to the Priest and said, "Father, do you mind if you ask you a very personal question"? The Priest said OK.

"You Priests take an oath of celibacy, right"?, asked the Rabbi. "Why, yes", answered the Priest, wondering where this was going.

"Well, haven't you ever had sex since you've become as Priest"?, asked the Rabbi. The Priest looked about nervous, leaned toward the rabbi and answered very softly, "As a young parishioner I was approached by a troubled woman who was looking for my guidance. She was a beautiful, young woman and one thing led to another. So, yes, just once I had sex with a woman".

A few moments pass and the Rabbi leans over to the Priest and says, "A lot better than pork, isn't it?"

421 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:28pm

re: #397 eclectic infidel

It's curious that the leftists tend to equate what they perceive to be "oppressive" leaders or governments with Hitler or the Nazis, too.

The 'common thread' of extremists, I suppose.

It's rather annoying. I wonder if it's a modern phenomenon. What did they say about Hitler? He's like ___ . Of course we've always heard "he's a little Hitler" in workplaces.

422 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:35pm

re: #409 Walter L. Newton

I own it Steve... forget it... it's toast LOL :)

I wondered...I should get a daily allowance...how will I ever retool?

423 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:38pm
424 HoosierHoops  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:39pm

re: #402 albusteve

whoa...what about my empty soul?

If all else fails there is always the Russian mail order bride web sites..

425 slokat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:40pm

re: #366 avanti

I built four of my last five computers from scratch. This one can pretend it's a mac whenever I feel the need to hobble it's potential. (or need to deal with the feeble programs that won't run otherwise).

/ maybe? or maybe not?

426 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:47pm

re: #364 Dar ul Harbarian

You might like this commercial.

427 The Dude  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:53pm
This is no reflection on Christ. It is a nasty, nasty reflection on a particular segment of His followers, however. I have been a Christian for twenty-one years, and I don't recognize these people. I want no part of this "pro-life" scene.

I haven't been a Christian as long as you, but like you, I don't recognize these people. I've never encountered anything remotely close to the mentality of a Randall Terry in my limited experience. If I had, I'd not be able to call myself a Christian.

428 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:00:54pm

re: #414 Cato the Elder

Walter: Not sure you saw this.

Yea, I did. I know, I spelt "YOUR" wrong. Thanks for pointing it out.
/

429 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:01:13pm

re: #411 albusteve

I'm IN bro!...I can redeem myself, I KNOW it!

For the 25 cent deposit?

430 Pawn of the Oppressor  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:01:57pm

re: #339 American Sabra

Um... what's that saying? You have two Jews in a room, you have three opinions?

I think of the joke about to Jewish guys stranded on a desert island who form seven political parties.

431 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:02:20pm

re: #429 OldLineTexan

For the 25 cent deposit?

OLT ... the days of the clanging bottles we collected on the side of the road to redeem at the store down the road ... WE WERE RICH! ... a penny a piece ... could buy much candy ...

432 jamgarr  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:02:26pm

I saw Trans live!

(I Need A Unit To Sample and Hold)

433 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:02:47pm

re: #424 HoosierHoops

If all else fails there is always the Russian mail order bride web sites..

I dig vodka...

434 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:02:51pm

re: #425 slokat

I built four of my last five computers from scratch. This one can pretend it's a mac whenever I feel the need to hobble it's potential. (or need to deal with the feeble programs that won't run otherwise).

/ maybe? or maybe not?

Well so much for my theory. Tech savvy conservatives, what next Twitter ?

435 LotharBot  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:03:00pm

re: #184 zombie

That is the fundamental basis of Calvinism

No, it's not. The fundamental basis of Calvinism is that people don't have any choice in the matter -- that God simply picks someone and says "you there, you're saved now* and that's the end of it." A large swath of Christian sects (including Calvinists and Armenians) agree upon the point that a person who is saved changes their behavior accordingly, and IIRC virtually all Christian sects will say of someone whose behavior doesn't match their expectations "that person is not a Christian".


* The acronym for the core Calvinist beliefs is TULIP:
Total depravity - man is so messed up he can't possibly choose to follow God
Unconditional election - God picks people for His own reasons, not because of their qualities
Limited Atonement - Jesus only died for the "elect"; His blood wasn't "wasted" on the non-elect
Irresistible grace - if God picks someone, they can't resist
Perseverance of the Saints - once God picks someone, they're permanently saved; there's no going back

436 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:03:15pm

TIM: All right, it is cavity time. Ah, here we go. Which reminds me, did you here the one about the rabbi and the farmer's daughter? Huh?

JERRY: Hey.

TIM: Those aren't mahtzah balls.

JERRY: Tim, do you think you should be making jokes like that?

TIM: Why not? I'm Jewish, remember?

JERRY: I know, but...

TIM: Jerry, it's our sense of humor that sustained us as a people for 3000 years.

JERRY: 5000.

TIM: 5000, even better. Okay, Chrissie. Give me a schtickle of flouride.

437 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:03:19pm

re: #415 Walter L. Newton


...I've got to go beddiebye now. Weet dreams, Walter.

Thanks.

Nobody wishes me wet dreams.

438 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:04:30pm

re: #429 OldLineTexan

For the 25 cent deposit?

hell 50 cents!...we'll party like APOSTLES!

439 Charles Johnson  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:04:32pm

re: #385 NukeAtomrod

One caveat though: He is correct that Anti-Abortion activists and people like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and the media as a whole should not be blamed for Tiller's murder simply because they presented evidence that abortion is barbaric and that Tiller performed many late-term abortions.

Bill O'Reilly demonized Dr. Tiller on his show more than 20 times. In front of millions of viewers, O'Reilly called him "Tiller the baby killer" over and over and over, compared him to a Nazi, and said he was running a "death mill."

Were O'Reilly and Hannity responsible for the murder? No. The person who pulled the trigger is responsible for the murder.

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

440 Occasional Reader  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:04:37pm

Good night.

441 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:04:58pm

re: #426 Slumbering Behemoth

You might like this commercial.

OMG!

442 legalpad  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:05:19pm

Comment I made in the middle of the night that seems more relevant to this thread:

Just an odd little observation here on the MSM and their surrogates: They observe massive and horrific killing of children in the name of Islam, and they start talking about root causes, their environment, their poverty, how the U.S. has mistreated them, and how we had it coming. They don't talk about anyone on their side inciting them to do it, or the religious philosophy behind it.

This bastard shoots a single adult male and they talk about which of their political adversaries caused him to do it, and how their views incite people to "violence". Imagine if some segment of the media started interviewing people who expressed sympathy and understanding for this guy, and pondered the "root cause" of his anger.

Personally, I have to wonder what security measures a guy like this doctor takes. It would seem, none. I take far more measures than that and I haven't focused the attention of thousands of potentially violent people on me. No amount of moral condemnation, by the way, is going to change these people. Why they think they are going to get control of this sort of thing is beyond me.

443 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:05:42pm

re: #416 JacksonTn

albusteve ... heathen ... drink! ...

I certainly am...after this thread why not?

444 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:06:01pm

re: #418 Alouette

When he went to put the cow's heart in the aron kodesh, he found a note saying, "Next time, send brisket!"

(again, another paragraph from "Things in Their Season" the 3rd story in my play "High Crimes and Misdemeanors") for you pleasure...

There once were two rabbis who could not agree, and one of them said, "If I'm right, let a heavenly voice declare it!" Sure enough, a voice thunders "He is right." But then the second Rabbi says, "It's written, lo bashamaim hi, the Torah is not in heaven, but with us. Therefore it is our rule to interpret the law ourselves, and not to look for signs or omens." And the students agreed and they decided the law in accordance with the second Rabbi's viewpoint. Then the heavenly voice is heard again "My children have defeated me at my own game!"

445 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:06:02pm

re: #428 Walter L. Newton

Yea, I did. I know, I spelt "YOUR" wrong. Thanks for pointing it out.
/

That wasn't my point. But since you mentioned it, you spelled "their" wrong, too. And unless you're a Brit, "spelt" is kinda off as well.

But that's what happens when people insist on typing when they're very, very mad.

Have a great evening, nevertheless. And by the way, I may get more for the gold plate than I thought. See, my ass is not so little. It's really pretty big.

446 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:07:07pm
447 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:07:13pm

re: #443 albusteve

I certainly am...after this thread why not?

albusteve ... I hear ya ... the two most dividing issues ... abortion and religion ...

449 Throbert McGee  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:07:42pm

re: #257 JacksonTn

TM ... OT ... you change your avatar all the time! ... what is the new one? ...

Aha, I was waiting for someone to axe me that!

My new avatar is intended to "encode" several different statements about who I am:

(1) Since my real-life given name is Rob, it represents a mirror image of my first initial.

(2) It can also be interpreted as the initial letter of "Republican" reflected to the left -- thus suggesting that I perceive myself as a "liberal right-winger" or something along those lines. (My rainbow-elephant avatar was also a mirror-image of the official "Republephant" GOP logo.)

(3) It's also the Cyrillic letter Я я -- a vowel letter representing the initial sound in "yacht" and "yarn", and called ja when it stands alone. Thus, it stands for my interest in the Russian language, which I began studying in college but have yet to master.

(4) In Russian, this letter also functions as a one-letter word that signifies the first-person singular pronoun -- thus "я был здесь" (ja byl zdes') = "I was here." So it stands for my belief in the importance of independent thinking and individual liberty.

(5) Finally, the color of the letter has its own significance: in standard Russian, the word golubój designates "light to medium shades of blue." (There's a different color-word that specifies very dark blues, as in the U.S. flag.) But in Russian slang, it's a euphemism for "men who prefer the company of men, in that way, if you know what I mean..."

450 slokat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:07pm

re: #434 avanti

Well so much for my theory. Tech savvy conservatives, what next Twitter ?

My children have forbid me from facebook, let alone being involved with twitter...

451 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:19pm

re: #445 Cato the Elder

That wasn't my point. But since you mentioned it, you spelled "their" wrong, too. And unless you're a Brit, "spelt" is kinda off as well.

But that's what happens when people insist on typing when they're very, very mad.

Have a great evening, nevertheless. And by the way, I may get more for the gold plate than I thought. See, my ass is not so little. It's really pretty big.

I glad I could lend some purpose to your life tonight. You don't take satire too well, do you? And I don't type mad, just fast sometimes.

452 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:21pm

re: #439 Charles

Bill O'Reilly demonized Dr. Tiller on his show more than 20 times. In front of millions of viewers, O'Reilly called him "Tiller the baby killer" over and over and over, compared him to a Nazi, and said he was running a "death mill."

Were O'Reilly and Hannity responsible for the murder? No. The person who pulled the trigger is responsible for the murder.

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

Responsibility is a pie, not an indivisible monad. Everyone around the table gets his proper slice.

I hope O'Reilly chokes on his.

453 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:26pm

Question for somebody, please: In the Randall Terry interview on Hannity, he criticizes some bishop for not actually showing up at the Notre Dame protests, saying "He (the bishop) has the canonical authority to prevent us from being arrested, if he were there..."

I've never heard anything like this. Is it just Terry spewing nonsense, or is there some basis for "canonical law" taking precedence over civil law? Thanks for any enlightenment.

454 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:29pm

re: #439 Charles

Bill O'Reilly demonized Dr. Tiller on his show more than 20 times. In front of millions of viewers, O'Reilly called him "Tiller the baby killer" over and over and over, compared him to a Nazi, and said he was running a "death mill."

Were O'Reilly and Hannity responsible for the murder? No. The person who pulled the trigger is responsible for the murder.

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

you know I am very uncomfortable with this but I tend to agree...it is a very sad commentary on the socio/political scene today...I'm almost ashamed actually

455 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:32pm

re: #445 Cato the Elder

That wasn't my point. But since you mentioned it, you spelled "their" wrong, too. And unless you're a Brit, "spelt" is kinda off as well.

But that's what happens when people insist on typing when they're very, very mad.

Have a great evening, nevertheless. And by the way, I may get more for the gold plate than I thought. See, my ass is not so little. It's really pretty big.

Well, ain't you a special-fucking snow-flake.

456 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:38pm
457 lostlakehiker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:44pm

re: #127 OldLineTexan
Blondes march in Latvia to cheer-up nation

Several hundred blonde women marched through the Latvian capital Riga yesterday in a bid to cheer up the crisis-hit Baltic nation, suffering the worst recession of all 27 EU member states.

"Finally something different, something positive because I'm tired of hearing about the crisis," said another, 70-year-old Ausma.

I have to get to Latvia.

"Me heap big photographer for LIFE."

/

"I'm not stupid. I'm beautiful and I'll prove it," Ilona Zigure, a participant, said.

Oh Kay. No doubt she's bright. But there's a hole here in the logic somewhere.

Still, it's uplifting that they're marching in full Blonde Rigalia.

458 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:51pm

re: #449 Throbert McGee

TM ... wow ... you really gave it some thought ... I like it ! ...

459 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:08:56pm

re: #439 Charles

Bill O'Reilly demonized Dr. Tiller on his show more than 20 times. In front of millions of viewers, O'Reilly called him "Tiller the baby killer" over and over and over, compared him to a Nazi, and said he was running a "death mill."

Were O'Reilly and Hannity responsible for the murder? No. The person who pulled the trigger is responsible for the murder.

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

O'Reilly and Hannity frequently engage in what can be called hate or fear mongering. In this case it was to the extreme. However, O'Reilly does his fear mongering schtick with the phrase secular progressives. He phrases the word secular as though it is inherently evil. Hannity does the same with the way he throws around the word atheist.

460 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:09:27pm

re: #449 Throbert McGee

/Thag raises hand

Thag leave now? Brain full.

/

461 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:09:47pm

re: #450 slokat

My children have forbid me from facebook, let alone being involved with twitter...

I'm on Facebook and Myspace, much to my son's amusement.

462 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:09:47pm

re: #451 Walter L. Newton

I glad I could lend some purpose to your life tonight. You don't take satire too well, do you? And I don't type mad, just fast sometimes.

Not having seen anything that would qualify as satire from you, I don't think you're in a position to judge how I might take it.

463 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:09:53pm

re: #451 Walter L. Newton

Yo.

464 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:10:01pm

re: #455 MandyManners

Well, ain't you a special-fucking snow-flake.

That was so damn funny, I actually laughed so loud that Maisey the Parrot just fell off her perch. A thousand up dings.

465 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:10:01pm

re: #445 Cato the Elder

That wasn't my point. But since you mentioned it, you spelled "their" wrong, too. And unless you're a Brit, "spelt" is kinda off as well.

But that's what happens when people insist on typing when they're very, very mad.

Have a great evening, nevertheless. And by the way, I may get more for the gold plate than I thought. See, my ass is not so little. It's really pretty big.

your're OK Cato

466 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:10:28pm

re: #455 MandyManners

Well, ain't you a special-fucking snow-flake.

And ain't you a repetitive driveler?

467 lostlakehiker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:10:58pm

re: #449 Throbert McGee

Aha, I was waiting for someone to axe me that!

My new avatar is intended to "encode" several different statements about who I am:

(1) Since my real-life given name is Rob, it represents a mirror image of my first initial.

(2) It can also be interpreted as the initial letter of "Republican" reflected to the left -- thus suggesting that I perceive myself as a "liberal right-winger" or something along those lines. (My rainbow-elephant avatar was also a mirror-image of the official "Republephant" GOP logo.)

(3) It's also the Cyrillic letter Я я -- a vowel letter representing the initial sound in "yacht" and "yarn", and called ja when it stands alone. Thus, it stands for my interest in the Russian language, which I began studying in college but have yet to master.

(4) In Russian, this letter also functions as a one-letter word that signifies the first-person singular pronoun -- thus "я был здесь" (ja byl zdes') = "I was here." So it stands for my belief in the importance of independent thinking and individual liberty.

(5) Finally, the color of the letter has its own significance: in standard Russian, the word golubój designates "light to medium shades of blue." (There's a different color-word that specifies very dark blues, as in the U.S. flag.) But in Russian slang, it's a euphemism for "men who prefer the company of men, in that way, if you know what I mean..."

The "handle" is a pretty definite clue already, innit?

468 reine.de.tout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:11:39pm

re: #453 ShanghaiEd

Question for somebody, please: In the Randall Terry interview on Hannity, he criticizes some bishop for not actually showing up at the Notre Dame protests, saying "He (the bishop) has the canonical authority to prevent us from being arrested, if he were there..."

I've never heard anything like this. Is it just Terry spewing nonsense, or is there some basis for "canonical law" taking precedence over civil law? Thanks for any enlightenment.

I didn't see the interview, but if your representation is accurate, it's BS.

469 Sheepdogess  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:11:52pm

Yes, it is terrorism. It exists on the left, on the right, all religions, all sexual persusions. Some of it just gets more press...

The 1990 Florida Dental Investigation: Theory and Fact
right arrow David Brown, MD

15 January 1996 %P% Volume 124 Issue 2 %P% Pages 255-256

Controversy remains about the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) conclusion that a dentist in Florida transmitted human immunodeficiency virus to six of his patients in the late 1980s.The most vocal doubt has come from journalists affiliated with the television program 60 Minutes. Although unanswered questions about the case remain, the evidence continues to overwhelmingly support the CDC's theory. The criticism of the CDC investigation consists largely of assertions that contrary evidence theoretically might exist.

[Link: www.annals.org...]

I remember this case because my best friends husband was a dentist and he knew exactly how Acer's patients contracted the disease (one didn't need to be a dentist to have figured this one out, corrupted Novocaine).

Humanity stinks.

470 reine.de.tout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:12:21pm

re: #461 avanti

I'm on Facebook and Myspace, much to my son's amusement.

I'm on Facebook, but my daughter has me "blocked".
LOL.

471 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:12:31pm

an aside:

You know you are surfing to the farthest reaches of the kookosphere when you hit a blog with Alex Jones, Atlah, Asatru, Atlas Shrieks, and America's Independence party national committee all linked in the sidebar...

472 Dianna  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:14:00pm

re: #471 Thanos

an aside:

You know you are surfing to the farthest reaches of the kookosphere when you hit a blog with Alex Jones, Atlah, Asatru, Atlas Shrieks, and America's Independence party national committee all linked in the sidebar...

Surely there are more?

473 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:14:02pm

re: #471 Thanos

an aside:

You know you are surfing to the farthest reaches of the kookosphere when you hit a blog with Alex Jones, Atlah, Asatru, Atlas Shrieks, and America's Independence party national committee all linked in the sidebar...

Which blog?

474 MandyManners  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:14:07pm

re: #466 Cato the Elder

And ain't you a repetitive driveler?

Cut-direct.

475 ArchangelMichael  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:14:36pm

re: #471 Thanos

an aside:

You know you are surfing to the farthest reaches of the kookosphere when you hit a blog with Alex Jones, Atlah, Asatru, Atlas Shrieks, and America's Independence party national committee all linked in the sidebar...

Kookvergence?

476 Charles Johnson  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:14:39pm

re: #471 Thanos

an aside:

You know you are surfing to the farthest reaches of the kookosphere when you hit a blog with Alex Jones, Atlah, Asatru, Atlas Shrieks, and America's Independence party national committee all linked in the sidebar...

Yikes. I hope you're wearing a HazMat suit.

477 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:15:18pm

re: #439 Charles

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

That "Tiller the baby killer" line was just too tempting for O'Reilly to not pick up on. He's all about sloganeering and grandstanding. Thats all he knows how to do. The "No-Spin Zone" is pure spin.

478 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:15:28pm

re: #1 Walter L. Newton

He's not really a Christian.

But! But! He says he is!

479 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:16:08pm

re: #439 Charles

Bill O'Reilly demonized Dr. Tiller on his show more than 20 times. In front of millions of viewers, O'Reilly called him "Tiller the baby killer" over and over and over, compared him to a Nazi, and said he was running a "death mill."

Were O'Reilly and Hannity responsible for the murder? No. The person who pulled the trigger is responsible for the murder.

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

When Avanti makes such a claim, I tend to dismiss it. When the boss does, I sit up and pay attention. The boss's record is impeccable. I am very disturbed because I had not picked up on this before. I fancy myself a pretty good judge of people but do not bring the diligence to the task that Charles does, obviously.

480 Temporarily Embarrassed Millionaire  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:16:13pm

I get the feeling that history is unfolding, and I don't think I like where it's going. I really want to be profoundly wrong.

481 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:17:02pm

re: #478 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

But! But! He says he is!

Oh please don't start it again :) I think I'll keep that remark to myself for a few weeks (I heard a collective sigh in the Force).

482 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:17:23pm
483 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:17:38pm

re: #105 Walter L. Newton

I don't agree. There is no test, it's a profession of faith. That's what they tell me all the time. A murderer on his death bed can "find Christ" and they tell me he is saved.

Over and over, it's a profession of faith, not a act of works. That's what I have heard all my life.

Walter: I grew up in the Southern Baptist Church, and this is indeed a doctrine. Some people call it "once saved, always saved" and it's definitely the rule rather than the exception among the Protestants I know of.

484 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:17:41pm

re: #480 negativ

History is always unfolding. And we have always been at war with Oceana.

485 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:17:44pm

re: #472 Dianna

Surely there are more?

This list goes on forever, those are just the highlights of the "A" section...

486 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:17:54pm

Dunno, you people who repeatedly surf the whack fringe blogs have to have a masochistic streak,imho.
Once, yes, to get the flavor, but continually?

More tolerance than I'll ever have.

487 Dancing along the light of day  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:18:39pm

re: #152 HoosierHoops

{HoosierHoops}

488 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:19:30pm

re: #486 irongrampa

Just trying to keep a lid on the crazy for the better of my party, call me a dedicated fool.

489 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:20:26pm

re: #413 irongrampa

I think you forgot the sarc tag?

Actually, I'm conflicted about this. On the one hand, it has an odor about it that the WH would jump to comment on the death of an doctor murdered by a terrorist but not a soldier murdered by a terrorist.

On the other hand, there is a presumption of innocence that is ill served by WH comment before trial. Wouldn't keep them from saying how sorry the death of the soldier makes them, of course.

Then there is the fact that I don't expect my President to do much for me. Keep the country safe, nominate a decent Supreme, and try to ride herd on those dolts we keep sending back to Congress. I fear there will be enough disappointment there to keep me in a fine misery for the foreseeable future.

I don't need the POTUS to lecture me about how bad murder is, though. I've got that. We can move on to another subject there.

I would kind of like that soldier's boss to say something about how killings like this right here in America demonstrate the dangers of radical Islam and do nothing to help the cause of religious tolerance.

I foresee disappointment there, too.

490 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:20:28pm

re: #483 ShanghaiEd

Walter: I grew up in the Southern Baptist Church, and this is indeed a doctrine. Some people call it "once saved, always saved" and it's definitely the rule rather than the exception among the Protestants I know of.

My point. If Terry claims he is a Christian, and professes that salvation in Christ, according to what I have been taught (told?), he's a Christian and saved.

And like I said somewhere above, the real issue is what he doies and what he wants to do, not his profession of anything.

he's a jerk, and as soon as we stop dismissing him with a "he's not a Christian" we can get along to the real problem and try to correct it.

He's a jerk.

491 HoosierHoops  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:20:29pm

re: #484 Mich-again

History is always unfolding. And we have always been at war with Oceana.

It's seems just like yesterday when you could get some decent T-Rex T-Ribs Steaks..Time flys..

492 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:20:40pm

re: #488 Thanos


Sooner call you a good person. Fits better.

493 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:21:02pm
494 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:21:22pm

re: #483 ShanghaiEd

Walter: I grew up in the Southern Baptist Church, and this is indeed a doctrine. Some people call it "once saved, always saved" and it's definitely the rule rather than the exception among the Protestants I know of.

And, amongst the Southern Baptists:

"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit." (Matthew 7: 16-17)

495 HoosierHoops  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:21:25pm

re: #487 Floral Giraffe

{HoosierHoops}

Thank you Floral...

496 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:22:02pm

Heard O'Reilly on the way home tonight.

I am an overall fan. But, gosh. Bill? People listen to you. Good people (I pray that I am one)... and people who are nucking futs.

But, by the same token, you could get famous; read "Green Eggs and Ham" on the air; and some idiot would murder a fox and put its remains in a box.

497 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:22:47pm

re: #474 MandyManners

Cut-direct.

You may not have noticed, but every time you insult me, I give you an upding.

I want to help you get to Karma 50k (from your current 36,787) before you hit 100k comments (currently 86,564).

Why?

To prove that with enough tenacity, rapacity and lack of sagacity, even someone who generally has nothing interesting to say and a foul-mouthed way of saying it can make it in this great country of ours.

498 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:22:53pm

re: #488 Thanos

Just trying to keep a lid on the crazy for the better of my party, call me a dedicated fool.

YOU DEDICATED FOOL!

499 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:22:57pm

Over at World Net Daily, there is a very strong denunciation of this murder. Other sites have similar views. Sarah Palin released her negative opinion on this as well. Of course, Randall Terry, an extremist himself, will find a way to approve the 'work' of a fellow extremist.

Perhaps we should check out more normal pro-life views in addition to those of such as Randall Terry, who is NOT the norm.

500 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:23:25pm

re: #496 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Heard O'Reilly on the way home tonight.

I am an overall fan. But, gosh. Bill? People listen to you. Good people (I pray that I am one)... and people who are nucking futs.

But, by the same token, you could get famous; read "Green Eggs and Ham" on the air; and some idiot would murder a fox and put its remains in a box.

do yourself a favor and get rid of Bill...you are just stuffing his box when you tune in

501 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:23:27pm

Late logging on
Don't know if anybody watched the O'Reilly factor but he was spot on tonight discussing the Tiller killing.

503 Lawrior  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:24:08pm

re: #499 avspatti

Then what would we yell at each other about?

504 jcm  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:24:10pm

re: #493 Iron Fist

I don't put lights on either, I like the light in the off hand. You can support the shooting hand with light hand and illuminate the target, but also put the light on other things and still cover the primary threat. It's more flexible IMHO.

505 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:24:10pm

re: #489 razorbacker

I understand the conflict, but i feel that a simple statement condemning the act would be a decent thing to do. Sort of a show of support, you might say.

506 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:24:26pm

re: #492 irongrampa

Well thanks kindly, I just kinda like fool. He was the sane one in King Lear for instance...


Here's a taste of that crazy site:

Marines Train Civilians to Accept Coming Martial Law

507 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:24:57pm

re: #479 The Shadow Do

When Avanti makes such a claim, I tend to dismiss it. When the boss does, I sit up and pay attention.

I'm crushed, shocked and bewildered. :)

508 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:24:59pm

re: #499 avspatti

Over at World Net Daily, there is a very strong denunciation of this murder. Other sites have similar views. Sarah Palin released her negative opinion on this as well. Of course, Randall Terry, an extremist himself, will find a way to approve the 'work' of a fellow extremist.

Perhaps we should check out more normal pro-life views in addition to those of such as Randall Terry, who is NOT the norm.

Just saw this at World Nut Daily...

DEAL OF THE DAY
Stunning Darwin-led-to-Hitler video – $4.95 today only!
Acclaimed DVD documentary, normally $25, will change your view of evolution forever
--WND

Front page too.

509 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:25:56pm

re: #499 avspatti

Over at World Net Daily, there is a very strong denunciation of this murder. Other sites have similar views. Sarah Palin released her negative opinion on this as well. Of course, Randall Terry, an extremist himself, will find a way to approve the 'work' of a fellow extremist.

Perhaps we should check out more normal pro-life views in addition to those of such as Randall Terry, who is NOT the norm.

Yes, but are the normal pro lifers going to denounce Terry?

510 Temporarily Embarrassed Millionaire  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:25:58pm

re: #484 Mich-again

Yeah, but I mean like the kind of history that gets its own cable TV channel.

511 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:26:41pm

re: #502 Dar ul Harbarian

Gamera is really neat!
He is filled with turtle meat!
We all love you Gameraaah!

512 NukeAtomrod  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:27:18pm

re: #439 Charles

Were O'Reilly and Hannity responsible for the murder? No. The person who pulled the trigger is responsible for the murder.

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

Certainly there's no doubt that the attention O'Reilly paid to Tiller made him famous. And Tiller's new found fame most likely made him a bigger target for whackos. And "demonize" is a fair term for what O'Reilly said about Tiller. I believe he was quoting the Anti-Abortion activists' rhetoric, but it wasn't always clear.

The problem I have is that, despite the rhetoric, the substance of what O'Reilly said was factual. AND when he suggested action on Tiller, it was always "write your Representative" and "call the Governor" type stuff.

I hate having to defend O'Reilly, because I don't even like him that much, but I don't like the alternative of the media and commentators not being able to report factual information for fear of being held responsible for the actions of any individual psychopath that might be inspired by it.

513 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:27:37pm

re: #501 Shug

Give us the Reader's Digest version. I don't watch much TV except for sports and Discovery Channel. Still kind of peeved they put the new season Ice Road Truckers debut during the Red Wings game last night. C'mon. My two favorite shows on at the same time.

I can only imagine how O'Reilly spun all this.

514 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:27:57pm

Weeping Guitar ...

515 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:28:31pm

re: #507 avanti

I'm crushed, shocked and bewildered. :)

Lefty's have feelings too? I'm sorry. I know you must be crushed (and shocked, and bewildered - is that a song?)...
/I'm such an old softie

516 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:28:33pm

re: #499 avspatti

Over at World Net Daily, there is a very strong denunciation of this murder. Other sites have similar views. Sarah Palin released her negative opinion on this as well. Of course, Randall Terry, an extremist himself, will find a way to approve the 'work' of a fellow extremist.

Perhaps we should check out more normal pro-life views in addition to those of such as Randall Terry, who is NOT the norm.

Randall Terry has written articles that have been published by World Net Daily. Next question.

Have you been keeping track of the statements at many, many conservative blogs, comments that are praising the killer and happy about the death of the doctor?

The "approval" of this act is not just an isolated incident. Why don't you go do a little research before you make such hollow statements like the one above?

517 Dar ul Harbarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:28:45pm

re: #508 Gus 802

Just saw this at World Nut Daily...

DEAL OF THE DAY
Stunning Darwin-led-to-Hitler video – $4.95 today only!
Acclaimed DVD documentary, normally $25, will change your view of evolution forever
--WND

Front page too..

And the Germ theory led to the Anthrax attacks.
And the Wright brothers led to 9/11.

518 abolitionist  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:28:48pm

re: #344 NelsFree

... Ananias and Saphira sold some land and took the money to donate it to the church. They held some back. When asked, each lied about it and were struck dead. The moral of the story: don't lie to God. ...

When I read that, I asked myself how could Peter know to a certainty that Ananias was not gifting all the proceeds of the sale? Perhaps Peter knew how exactly much money went out the backdoor to fund the buyout, and that a lesser amount came back in. I suspect Peter was enraged upon learning that the property deed that he expected for free had actually cost him something. Ananias and Saphira died because they lied to G*d? I don't think there was ever any moral to the story. Just a hard lesson.

519 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:29:39pm

re: #515 The Shadow Do

I know you must be crushed (and shocked, and bewildered - is that a song?)...

I think its a Ben and Jerry's flavor.

520 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:30:01pm

re: #514 JacksonTn

check this out...Jeff Healey

521 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:30:11pm

re: #517 Dar ul Harbarian

Well, before I say goodnight.

I am proud to be the son of a country that did not give up after the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.

Now. Goodnight.

522 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:30:14pm

re: #506 Thanos

That's six shades past crazy.On the other hand, it's a testimonial to the freedom we live under.

523 slokat  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:30:28pm

re: #483 ShanghaiEd

Walter: I grew up in the Southern Baptist Church, and this is indeed a doctrine. Some people call it "once saved, always saved" and it's definitely the rule rather than the exception among the Protestants I know of.

...and they said,"but we did these things in your name", yet I knew them not...

524 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:31:09pm

re: #518 abolitionist

When I read that, I asked myself how could Peter know to a certainty that Ananias was not gifting all the proceeds of the sale? Perhaps Peter knew how exactly much money went out the backdoor to fund the buyout, and that a lesser amount came back in. I suspect Peter was enraged upon learning that the property deed that he expected for free had actually cost him something. Ananias and Saphira died because they lied to G*d? I don't think there was ever any moral to the story. Just a hard lesson.

Yes, and fundamentalist who embrace all the apostolic gifs and promises, like Randall Terry, believe that they too are justified in calling for, or praying for, the death of people like the abortion doctor. It's scriptures like this that they build that reasoning from.

525 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:31:24pm

re: #517 Dar ul Harbarian

And the Germ theory led to the Anthrax attacks.

Radicals in the anti-abortion crowd were behind some of the post-9/11 anthrax attacks. That brings it all together.

526 Dancing along the light of day  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:32:37pm

re: #495 HoosierHoops

It's hard to loose a friend. He sounded like a good guy. Prayers for his family.

527 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:33:01pm

re: #512 NukeAtomrod

Some of what O'Reilly stated was misinformation supplied by a political operative. That information was proven false with the withdrawal of Kline's case, and the not guilty verdict in the last trial .

528 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:33:05pm

re: #439 Charles

Bill O'Reilly demonized Dr. Tiller on his show more than 20 times. In front of millions of viewers, O'Reilly called him "Tiller the baby killer" over and over and over, compared him to a Nazi, and said he was running a "death mill."

Were O'Reilly and Hannity responsible for the murder? No. The person who pulled the trigger is responsible for the murder.

But Bill O'Reilly helped create the atmosphere this killer breathed, and in my opinion he does have some responsibility in this.

I do not agree with the idea that O'Reilly has any responsibility for this murder. The killer is the one and the only one responsible. Just because Tiller was called a baby killer, which he was especially as he specialized in late term abortions, doesn't cause anyone to go shoot the man. The killer had been in trouble before and was not your normal, every day pro-life person. Most decent pro-life people are quite rightly horrified and repulsed by this murder. This kind of taking the law into one's own hands is NOT the solution to anything imo.

529 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:33:10pm

re: #513 Mich-again

O'reilly didn't need to spin it.

and I never heard of Ice truckers but Osgood was awesome last night and the wings will win in 5, maybe 6 if Pittsburgh is lucky.

but the fight at the end will make the next few games more interesting.

530 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:33:30pm
531 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:33:46pm

re: #468 reine.de.tout

I didn't see the interview, but if your representation is accurate, it's BS.

Thanks, Reine. It certainly sounded off-the-wall to me.

I just found this is the Legal Dictionary online:

...Canon law has no legal force except within the Vatican in Rome, Italy, and in those nations in which the Catholic Church is the "official" church and where it prevails in religious matters which may affect all citizens (such as abortion and divorce).

The first half is very clear to me, but second half seems to leave a little waffle room. My ignorance on the subject is vast. (Or as a friend of mine would put it, "My knowledge is half-vast.")

532 avanti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:33:52pm

re: #512 NukeAtomrod

Certainly there's no doubt that the attention O'Reilly paid to Tiller made him famous. And Tiller's new found fame most likely made him a bigger target for whackos. And "demonize" is a fair term for what O'Reilly said about Tiller. I believe he was quoting the Anti-Abortion activists' rhetoric, but it wasn't always clear.

The problem I have is that, despite the rhetoric, the substance of what O'Reilly said was factual. AND when he suggested action on Tiller, it was always "write your Representative" and "call the Governor" type stuff.

I hate having to defend O'Reilly, because I don't even like him that much, but I don't like the alternative of the media and commentators not being able to report factual information for fear of being held responsible for the actions of any individual psychopath that might be inspired by it.

I disagree, O'reilly's rhetoric was not accurate. Tiller was not a "baby killer" he performed a legal medical practice, even if you disagree with it. He said Tiller did 60,000 abortions, which is wildly inaccurate, he said " Want a baby killed, Tiller will do it for $5000 no questions asked", and so on.

533 Randall Gross  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:34:02pm

re: #522 irongrampa

That's six shades past crazy.On the other hand, it's a testimonial to the freedom we live under.

I was trained well for the coming military rule, when I was a kid I went to the armed forces day show every year.

534 razorbacker  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:34:04pm

re: #505 irongrampa

I know. I feel ya, irongrampa (as my great-nephew tells me).

The cynic in me says that abortion trends left and soldiers trend right, and you've got to keep your base about you and the hell with the rest of 'em and that that explains it.

I struggle with my cynicism. Often it is a failing effort.

535 The Shadow Do  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:34:16pm

re: #519 Mich-again

I think its a Ben and Jerry's flavor.

Mmmm...

Or a Democrat economic plan?

536 Dianna  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:34:45pm

re: #509 Thanos

Yes, but are the normal pro lifers going to denounce Terry?

To go by the ones on this site, yes.

To go by comments we're reading all over the place...excuse me while I bang my head on my desk.

537 irongrampa  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:34:54pm

Time for the old folk. We have a local unit returning tomorrow, gotta go down and greet them. So tomorrow WILL be a fine day.

Stay safe, good people.

538 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:35:07pm

re: #506 Thanos

Well thanks kindly, I just kinda like fool. He was the sane one in King Lear for instance...

Here's a taste of that crazy site:

Marines Train Civilians to Accept Coming Martial Law

That's funny. They're showing images from Fleet Week at Cloves Lake Park and saying "Note the "civilians" in the background who are being trained to accept martial law."

539 Learned Mother of Zion  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:35:21pm

re: #497 Cato the Elder

You may not have noticed, but every time you insult me, I give you an upding.

I want to help you get to Karma 50k (from your current 36,787) before you hit 100k comments (currently 86,564).

Why?

To prove that with enough tenacity, rapacity and lack of sagacity, even someone who generally has nothing interesting to say and a foul-mouthed way of saying it can make it in this great country of ours.

I gave you a martyr cookie.

540 JacksonTn  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:35:25pm

re: #520 albusteve

check this out...Jeff Healey


[Video]

albusteve ... sweet ...

541 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:35:41pm

re: #529 Shug

and I never heard of Ice truckers

You never heard of Ice Road Truckers? Its a genuine reality show. Kind of like The Deadliest Catch in a way.

542 Irish Rose  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:35:50pm

Good evening, lizards.

543 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:36:01pm

re: #509 Thanos

Yes, but are the normal pro lifers going to denounce Terry?

Yes, they are and they do. Count me among them. It was a sickening, disgusting and brutal thing to do. As someone who is pro-life, cold-blooded murder doesn't strike me as a very pro-life thing to do.

544 shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:36:28pm

re: #513 Mich-again

Give us the Reader's Digest version. I don't watch much TV except for sports and Discovery Channel. Still kind of peeved they put the new season Ice Road Truckers debut during the Red Wings game last night. C'mon. My two favorite shows on at the same time.

I can only imagine how O'Reilly spun all this.

O'Reilly didn't need to spin anything since he is in the right.

Regarding the wings : I never heard of ice trucks, but Osgood was a freaking mac truck and the fight at the end was awesome

wings in 5...too bad. I'd love them to hoist the cup at the Joe

545 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:37:11pm

re: #508 Gus 802

Front page too.

What has that to do with what I posted about?

546 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:37:42pm

re: #528 avspatti

you doubt the influence of people like O'Riley?...go ahead...he's a right wing Imam preaching his schtick...an irresponsible loudmouth, a ratings whore...at best

547 freetoken  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:38:15pm

re: #499 avspatti

Check out the poll WND is running on this topic, as well as the comments on that poll.

Oh, and the word "normal" should probably never be used in reference to WND.

548 albusteve  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:38:23pm

re: #540 JacksonTn

albusteve ... sweet ...

yes..the kid had it all...he's gone now

549 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:38:28pm

re: #544 shug

O'Reilly didn't need to spin anything since he is in the right.

Regarding the wings : I never heard of ice trucks, but Osgood was a freaking mac truck and the fight at the end was awesome

wings in 5...too bad. I'd love them to hoist the cup at the Joe

Was it a goalie fight? Missed the game, but remember the Roy/Osgood fight. LOL

550 reine.de.tout  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:38:35pm

re: #531 ShanghaiEd

The first half is very clear to me, but second half seems to leave a little waffle room. My ignorance on the subject is vast. (Or as a friend of mine would put it, "My knowledge is half-vast.")

Is this the 2nd half you felt leaves a little "waffle" room?

. . . and where it prevails in religious matters which may affect all citizens (such as abortion and divorce).

This means that in matters such as abortion and divorce, Catholics must adhere to canon law. It doesn't mean that "canon law" trumps civil law in cases of trespassing or other civil matters. I did not phrase that as elegantly as I would have liked to, but you get the drift, I think. Or perhaps I misunderstood you?

551 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:39:25pm

re: #547 freetoken

Check out the poll WND is running on this topic, as well as the comments on that poll.

Oh, and the word "normal" should probably never be used in reference to WND.

Which is one reason I pointed out that WND had a very good piece condemning the murder.

552 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:40:00pm

re: #545 avspatti

What has that to do with what I posted about?

Nothing. Next time I'll make sure and only respond to whatever you're talking about. Especially if it regarding World Nut Daily.

553 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:42:05pm

re: #532 avanti

I disagree, O'reilly's rhetoric was not accurate. Tiller was not a "baby killer" he performed a legal medical practice, even if you disagree with it. He said Tiller did 60,000 abortions, which is wildly inaccurate, he said " Want a baby killed, Tiller will do it for $5000 no questions asked", and so on.

He was a baby killer because he specialized in very late term abortions when the baby involved would probably have lived if being allowed to be born even at that number of weeks.

554 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:42:28pm

re: #539 Alouette

I gave you a martyr cookie.

Thanks.

Denounce any JINOs today?

555 Scorch  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:43:15pm

re: #509 Thanos
I never have hear of Terry till this thread and really dont give a hoot about his opinion. This comes from one who doesn't think killing a child is a good form of birth control, there are many other alternatives available.

556 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:43:20pm

re: #552 Gus 802

Nothing. Next time I'll make sure and only respond to whatever you're talking about. Especially if it regarding World Nut Daily.

Thank you.

557 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:46:05pm

re: #549 avspatti

Was it a goalie fight? Missed the game, but remember the Roy/Osgood fight. LOL

No It was like Game 1. The Pens played better than the Wings but just couldn't get the puck in the net. OTOH the Wings scored on lucky shots that they probably couldn't repeat if you gave the shooter a bucket of pucks. The Pens could be up right now 2-0 with a couple lucky bounces. Great action though from start to finish.

Oh and they should have let Malkin and Zetterburg finish their fight last night. Funny how the only time the NHL wants to stop violence is when their is a fair fight brewing. All the "legal" hits that are OK feature one guy plowing into another guy who is either vulnerable or not even looking.

No way should Malkin have been given an instigator penalty that might have led to a suspension. I was actually happy to see someone on the Penguins show some emotion.

558 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:46:14pm

re: #553 avspatti

He was a baby killer because he specialized in very late term abortions when the baby involved would probably have lived if being allowed to be born even at that number of weeks.

No, it was a legal procedure. He was not a killer.

559 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:46:32pm

re: #549 avspatti

Was it a goalie fight? Missed the game, but remember the Roy/Osgood fight. LOL

one of the best ever...along with the Vernon Roy fight

and the broadcaster ( I think it was Ray Lane ) shoting " welcome back to Old time Hockey" )

560 Liberal Classic  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:47:53pm

re: #36 mich-again

So now we have Christians issuing fatwas and calling for their version of sharia law.

This wasn't the sort of cross-cultural pollination I was hoping for.

561 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:48:15pm
562 Cato the Elder  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:48:47pm

re: #36 mich-again

So now we have Christians issuing fatwas and calling for their version of sharia law.

Now?

Since when is there anything new about this?

563 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:48:59pm

re: #516 Walter L. Newton

Randall Terry has written articles that have been published by World Net Daily. Next question.

Have you been keeping track of the statements at many, many conservative blogs, comments that are praising the killer and happy about the death of the doctor?

The "approval" of this act is not just an isolated incident. Why don't you go do a little research before you make such hollow statements like the one above?

I never stated that some people were or were not approving. I never stated anything about R. Terry articles at all. What I pointed out was that there was a strong article denouncing the murder. I am not responsible for anything else. What I stated is the truth, and people might want to go there and read it for themselves. Just because some have a negative opinion of WND doesn't negate this article.

564 OldLineTexan  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:50:55pm

Well, I gotta get some fatwas typed up for tomorrow.

/later

565 Liberal Classic  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:51:12pm

re: #553 avspatti

He was a baby killer because he specialized in very late term abortions when the baby involved would probably have lived if being allowed to be born even at that number of weeks.

Abortions past the 20th week represent about one percent of all abortions, and of these, the vast majority are due to development or genetic defects. It's not safe to assume they're all healthy and viable, even if carried to term.

566 Throbert McGee  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:51:36pm

re: #460 OldLineTexan

/Thag raises hand

Thag leave now? Brain full.

/

Thag, I used to work as an editor for Dell Puzzle Magazines, so this kind of thinking comes naturally to me.

567 Gus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:51:37pm

[rolls eyes]

568 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:51:50pm

re: #558 Walter L. Newton

No, it was a legal procedure. He was not a killer.

I completely agree. It was legal.but the law is an ass

I believe the experiments done by Mengele were legal at the time if I am not mistaken.

I say this as an MD.
Most here don't know but I am an MD. Realwest knows, a few other know.
I am ashamed to be in the same profession as Tiller. In fact I am far more trained in what he was doing than he was and what he was doing was disgusting to me and those who work in the field I do.
Yes it was legal but only because those making laws were ignorant to what he was doing

569 Former Belgian  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:53:09pm

re: #62 Mich-again

Sounds like an example of the "No good Scotsman.." argument.

The word "Christian" has at least four common meanings in daily usage:
* somebody who identifies with any of the Catholic, Protestant, or Eastern Orthodox denominations
* somebody who identifies with the "Bible-believing" branches of Protestantism.
* somebody who "accepts [...] as his savior" (this latter definition is usually conflated with the previous one)
* somebody who tries to live "in imitatio Christi"

The tactic being followed here is more "definition-parsing" than "no true Scotsman". Like Slick WIllie Clinton was technically correct, under certain definitions of "relations", when he said he did not have "relations" with Monica L ;-) It didn't make his defense any less dishonest in spirit. ;-)

570 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:53:18pm

re: #565 Liberal Classic

It's not safe to assume they're all healthy and viable, even if carried to term.

Neither is the opposite safe to assume.

571 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:53:27pm

According to a link above, American Thinker also has a strong article also condemning the murder. I get tired of the misconception that all or even most pro-life people are idiots. It is NOT true.

572 [deleted]  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:54:13pm
573 NukeAtomrod  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:55:34pm

re: #553 avspatti

He was a baby killer because he specialized in very late term abortions when the baby involved would probably have lived if being allowed to be born even at that number of weeks.

re: #558 Walter L. Newton

No, it was a legal procedure. He was not a killer.

It was a legal procedure and he was a killer.

Not a murderer, a legally sanctioned killer. Abortion is both legal and barbaric. I don't know if we should interfere if someone wants to kill their own unborn child, but there is something seriously wrong with those who choose to do that without good cause.

574 gtrs  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:55:49pm

re: #479 The Shadow Do actually it was me who made the initial statement on this, not avanti(and o' reilly would not back off today)

575 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:56:21pm

re: #572 taxfreekiller

Death is unsafe still.

TFK, you look like James Randi.

(honco salute)

576 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:57:15pm

re: #569 Former Belgian

The first three definitions are supposed to encompass the fourth but they don't. The first three are easy. The fourth one is just about impossible.

577 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:57:23pm

re: #565 Liberal Classic

Abortions past the 20th week represent about one percent of all abortions, and of these, the vast majority are due to development or genetic defects. It's not safe to assume they're all healthy and viable, even if carried to term.

That may or may not be the case, but my point is that Tiller SPECIALIZED in late term abortions. I, personally, know of several babies born very early, who not only lived but today are above normal in intelligence and other abilities. We cannot always know who will thrive and who will not.

578 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 8:59:41pm

re: #577 avspatti

That may or may not be the case, but my point is that Tiller SPECIALIZED in late term abortions. I, personally, know of several babies born very early, who not only lived but today are above normal in intelligence and other abilities. We cannot always know who will thrive and who will not.

Let's get down to brass tacks. Two easy questions, two easy answers. Yes or no.

1) Did the doctor get what he deserved?
2) Does Randall Terry have a valid argument.

ready, set...

579 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:00:40pm

re: #559 Shug

one of the best ever...along with the Vernon Roy fight

and the broadcaster ( I think it was Ray Lane ) shoting " welcome back to Old time Hockey" )

I miss Roy.

580 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:02:18pm

re: #578 Walter L. Newton

Beat me to it. My version was:

OK, so Tiller is a killer, he kills, et al etc.

Do you condone what he received or think he deserved it?

581 Scorch  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:02:24pm

re: #561 taxfreekiller

Well, it is clear then, Lt. for life John F. Kerry and his anti war nut case loon helpers are responsible for the 10 million dead in Laos, Cambodia, South Vietnam ect.

So true. I still remember when Saigon fell to the communists while we were on a med cruise and feeling the disgust of being beaten not by our enemies but by our own people at home. Then being spit on by a long haired creep in the airport in Washington DC. That just about ended my tolerance for those low lifes.

582 gtrs  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:02:25pm

re: #501 Shug
pardon me while i disagree

583 horse  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:02:37pm

There are groups of people in our country heading down several terrifying trajectories whose climatic intersection appears to draw closer every week. The barriers restraining criminal atrocities like the murder of the doctor, the military men, and other citizens this year are eroding as more people hop onto these radical causes and really believe the ends justify the means. The extreme right, extreme left, and extreme religioust are like three packs of meteorites intermingling at times, but ultimately all heading toward us and preparing to sock it to us for our own good. A 1-2-3 combination punch to our liberty. This is so damn frustrating.

584 Liberal Classic  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:03:35pm

re: #577 avspatti

We cannot always know who will thrive and who will not.

We can't always know, but sometimes we do.

585 legalpad  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:04:07pm

re: #583 horse

The barriers restraining criminal atrocities like the murder of the doctor

What barriers?

586 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:05:21pm

re: #580 BigPapa

Beat me to it. My version was:

OK, so Tiller is a killer, he kills, et al etc.

Do you condone what he received or think he deserved it?

Let's see, still waiting for it's answer.

587 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:05:26pm

re: #578 Walter L. Newton

Let's get down to brass tacks. Two easy questions, two easy answers. Yes or no.

1) Did the doctor get what he deserved?
2) Does Randall Terry have a valid argument.

ready, set...

Ok. Fine.

#1: No
#2: No

What the doctor did was legal, as you pointed out, and very wrong. It is not up to us, personally, to take the law into our hands. I am from a family of lawyers and am a firm believer in following the law. If the law is incorrect, it can be changed. Does that answer your questions? I believe the doctor will get what he deserves, only not here.

588 Walter L. Newton  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:06:16pm

re: #587 avspatti

Ok. Fine.

#1: No
#2: No

What the doctor did was legal, as you pointed out, and very wrong. It is not up to us, personally, to take the law into our hands. I am from a family of lawyers and am a firm believer in following the law. If the law is incorrect, it can be changed. Does that answer your questions? I believe the doctor will get what he deserves, only not here.

Thank you.

589 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:06:18pm

re: #565 Liberal Classic

Abortions past the 20th week represent about one percent of all abortions, and of these, the vast majority are due to development or genetic defects. It's not safe to assume they're all healthy and viable, even if carried to term.

You are correct. Most represent infants with lethal anomalies like anencephaly, or trisomy 18 or 13 who the American heart association directs neonatologists that non resuscitation is a viable option. ( these are the only 3 conditions which are mentioned in the DO NOT RESUSCITATE in the delivery room clause )( however if the parents wish legal prescedent is clear that you must resuscitate them )
However, nonresuscitation of a dying newborn is different than placing a pillow over and murdering a crying newborn with teh above conditions.

as a physician, I am in the right to NOT INITIATE resuscitation of a baby with a terminal illness and the baby dies. I AM A CRIMINAL to smother to death with a pillow a baby with a terminal illness who might die.

What Tiller was doing was in effect Smothering to death infants still in the wonb, which is still LEGAL in America.
Not in France. Not in England. Not in The netherlands ( where Euthenasia of these babies is legal after birth if it looks like they will not survive)

590 Kronocide  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:07:03pm

re: #587 avspatti

I believe the doctor will get what he deserves, only not here.

What does he deserve?

591 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:07:43pm

re: #578 Walter L. Newton

Let's get down to brass tacks. Two easy questions, two easy answers. Yes or no.

1) Did the doctor get what he deserved?
2) Does Randall Terry have a valid argument.

ready, set...


1. NO
2. irrelevent

592 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:08:03pm

Its odd to me that someone who kills a pregnant woman can get charged with a double-homicide in the same state where abortion is legal. Either the unborn child is a person or it isn't but I can't see how both are legally justified. Maybe it has something to do with the Mother's right to choose the person/non-person status of the unborn?
As for was the murder of Tiller justified? Nope. Does Terry Randall have a valid argument? Nope again.

593 Throbert McGee  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:09:55pm

re: #565 Liberal Classic

Abortions past the 20th week represent about one percent of all abortions, and of these, the vast majority are due to development or genetic defects. It's not safe to assume they're all healthy and viable, even if carried to term.

According to the wiki entry on George Tiller:

(1) Kansas law permits late-term abortions (past 21st week) of healthy, viable fetuses in cases where carrying the pregnancy to term would cause the mother to suffer "substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function."

(2) In March 2009, Tiller found himself in trouble with Kansas authorities over some of the abortions he had performed. The charge against Tiller had to do with whether he had adequately established the probability of "substantial and irreversible [harm]" to the pregnant woman before aborting the late-term fetus she was carrying. Tiller was ultimately acquitted of this charge, however.

594 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:10:20pm

re: #557 Mich-again

Is this the place to repeat our mantra here in Denver? Red Wings s***? LOL

595 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:13:09pm

re: #594 avspatti

Is this the place to repeat our mantra here in Denver? Red Wings s***? LOL

Yes, its always entertaining to hear that chant from fans of teams whose skates have been hanging up so long the laces are dry rotted!

596 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:14:36pm

re: #594 avspatti

Is this the place to repeat our mantra here in Denver? Red Wings s***? LOL


the avs still have a franchise?

I didn't know. it's just been so long since they were on TV

597 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:15:25pm

re: #593 Throbert McGee

According to the wiki entry on George Tiller:

(1) Kansas law permits late-term abortions (past 21st week) of healthy, viable fetuses in cases where carrying the pregnancy to term would cause the mother to suffer "substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function."

(2) In March 2009, Tiller found himself in trouble with Kansas authorities over some of the abortions he had performed. The charge against Tiller had to do with whether he had adequately established the probability of "substantial and irreversible [harm]" to the pregnant woman before aborting the late-term fetus she was carrying. Tiller was ultimately acquitted of this charge, however.


so was OJ

598 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:16:11pm

re: #494 OldLineTexan

And, amongst the Southern Baptists:

"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit." (Matthew 7: 16-17)

Yes. My denomination quoted this verse, but pointed out it had nothing to do with salvation...only with the "rewards" one will get (if any) in heaven. The clincher, they argued, was Ephesians 2:8-9 (emphasis mine),

For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.

599 NukeAtomrod  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:16:23pm

re: #578 Walter L. Newton

Let's get down to brass tacks. Two easy questions, two easy answers. Yes or no.

1) Did the doctor get what he deserved?
2) Does Randall Terry have a valid argument.

ready, set...

600 Liberal Classic  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:16:42pm

re: #592 Mich-again

Maybe it has something to do with the Mother's right to choose the person/non-person status of the unborn?

The real question is, to whom should this decision fall? Right now, the largest responsibility is held by the mother. Is this wrong? If it is wrong, who else should have the responsibility to make this decision?

601 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:17:11pm

re: #592 Mich-again

Its odd to me that someone who kills a pregnant woman can get charged with a double-homicide in the same state where abortion is legal. Either the unborn child is a person or it isn't but I can't see how both are legally justified. Maybe it has something to do with the Mother's right to choose the person/non-person status of the unborn?
As for was the murder of Tiller justified? Nope. Does Terry Randall have a valid argument? Nope again.

I have often wondered about that as well. It is contradictory, and the mother has no real power to state whether the unborn is or is not a person. The unborn either is or isn't, but this is not a matter of the mother's opinion.

602 Liberal Classic  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:18:38pm

re: #601 avspatti

The unborn either is or isn't, but this is not a matter of the mother's opinion.

Why not?

603 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:18:54pm

re: #596 Shug

the avs still have a franchise?

I didn't know. it's just been so long since they were on TV

Be nice! LOL The Avs are in a pit at the moment. Getting a new GM is first, getting a decent goalie is second, and getting a good coach is third. We are all crossing our fingers here.

604 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:19:39pm

re: #523 slokat

...and they said,"but we did these things in your name", yet I knew them not...

Amen. That verse, however, was not among my church's favorites, because it clearly applied to other denominations. :)

605 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:20:11pm

re: #598 ShanghaiEd

The fruit is the RESULT of salvation, not the cause.

606 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:20:58pm

re: #593 Throbert McGee

According to the wiki entry on George Tiller:

(1) Kansas law permits late-term abortions (past 21st week) of healthy, viable fetuses in cases where carrying the pregnancy to term would cause the mother to suffer "substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function."

(2) In March 2009, Tiller found himself in trouble with Kansas authorities over some of the abortions he had performed. The charge against Tiller had to do with whether he had adequately established the probability of "substantial and irreversible [harm]" to the pregnant woman before aborting the late-term fetus she was carrying. Tiller was ultimately acquitted of this charge, however.

look up the mrntal health loophole and then research some of the cases done using this loophole

607 horse  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:22:06pm

re: #585 legalpad

What barriers?

The normal societal barriers that discourage extreme criminal behavior. If you fear someone you can influence will commit an extreme criminal act, you do everything you can to discourage and prevent it. However, the influencers of these groups have taken down those barriers through their words and deeds. Hell, they encourage their fellow believers to "take action". It starts with smaller acts like making it "ok" to throw blood on fur, vandalize a lab, screaming in peoples faces, publishing the private information of those you oppose, etc... escalates to throwing bricks at buses, spraying people with chemicals, bombing facilities, etc... and finishes with the murder of people. This bad economic time seems to feed the extreme environments, accelerating the cycles of escalation and barrier erosion. I fear we are in for a rough few years.

608 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:23:27pm

re: #603 avspatti

Be nice! LOL The Avs are in a pit at the moment. Getting a new GM is first, getting a decent goalie is second, and getting a good coach is third. We are all crossing our fingers here.

I miss the days of Mike Vernon and Patrick Roy throwdowns at center ice

God, the was the most heated and hated rivalry for 5 years or so in all of sports

609 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:24:36pm

re: #600 Liberal Classic

The real question is, to whom should this decision fall? Right now, the largest responsibility is held by the mother. Is this wrong? If it is wrong, who else should have the responsibility to make this decision?

I suppose now the largest responsibility is held by the Mother so it makes sense that if she were planning to carry the baby full term, then the baby's death would be a murder. However if the opposite was true and she was on her way to having an abortion when the baby was killed in some act of violence, the murder charge would be pretty hard to justify.

That is the kind of situation that makes for bad law. The same act of violence yields a different criminal charge based on the intent of a third party.

610 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:26:24pm

re: #605 avspatti

The fruit is the RESULT of salvation, not the cause.

I understand. But my church (or ex-church, more accurately) taught that even if there is bad fruit, or no fruit, it doesn't undo someone's eternal salvation; therefore, they are still a Christian. Not an exemplary one, but a Christian.

611 Mich-again  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:33:31pm

re: #606 Shug

look up the mental health loophole and then research some of the cases done using this loophole

All men who are fathers know for sure that their wife's mental health can and will be negatively affected by having a child at least for some period of time. That is a pretty big loophole.

612 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:37:56pm

re: #611 Mich-again

All men who are fathers know for sure that their wife's mental health can and will be negatively affected by having a child at least for some period of time. That is a pretty big loophole.

As a mother, I can attest to the truth of that statement. Potty training springs to mind as an example. Teens' driving is another. LOL

613 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:38:45pm

Here's an interesting new study that seems counter-intuitive to me:

Religious devotion does not impact abortion decisions of young unwed women

WASHINGTON, DC -- Unwed pregnant teens and twenty-somethings who attend or have graduated from private religious schools are more likely to obtain abortions than their peers from public schools, according to sociological research published in the June issue of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior.

"This research suggests that young, unmarried women are confronted with a number of social, financial and health-related factors that can make it difficult for them to act according to religious values when deciding whether to keep or abort a pregnancy," said the study's author, sociologist Amy Adamczyk, an assistant professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and the Graduate Center, City University of New York.

614 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:39:19pm

re: #608 Shug

We are planning on a resurgence. Be ready.

615 NukeAtomrod  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:39:59pm

re: #602 Liberal Classic

Why not?

Biology

616 JackofTrades  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:40:25pm

re: #31 Charles

This is domestic terrorism, folks. This video is the equivalent of an Al Qaeda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks.

I've gotta say that I think you have gotten a bit soft or generous with age, Charles. (That is partly since I don't recall any Al Qaeda videos disavowing responsibility.)

I am not sure that you say this strongly enough, here, but I am at a loss for how to say it more strongly. Endorsing the murderous action taken against Dr. Tiller is not that far off from doing the murder themselves. (Yes, I apply to Christians, "Christians", and "Christian" extremists the same standard I apply to Moslems, "Moslems", and "Moslem" extremists.)

617 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:41:00pm

re: #604 ShanghaiEd

Amen. That verse, however, was not among my church's favorites, because it clearly applied to other denominations. :)

That passage is terrifying imo.

618 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:42:15pm

re: #602 Liberal Classic

Why not?

Opinion doesn't change fact.

619 Wendya  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:43:37pm

re: #27 OldLineTexan

This guy would fit right in a "demonstration" in NYC with a disgusting sign ... he has the ugly eye-gleam going.

He's always been a complete nutcase. I remember when he rolled through Atlanta in the late 80's with his insane followers throwing plastic fetuses at women trying to enter the midtown clinic. As I recall, he tried to have a real aborted fetus delivered to Clinton when he was in the WH. They also ran into some trouble a couple of years back driving those damned "truth trucks" repeatedly past elementary, middle and high schools when the kids were getting out for the day.

620 avspatti  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:43:53pm

re: #590 BigPapa

What does he deserve?

That is not up to me or to you. Thank goodness.

621 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:46:21pm

re: #532 avanti

I disagree, O'reilly's rhetoric was not accurate. Tiller was not a "baby killer" he performed a legal medical practice, even if you disagree with it. He said Tiller did 60,000 abortions, which is wildly inaccurate, he said " Want a baby killed, Tiller will do it for $5000 no questions asked", and so on.

so what did he charge and how many did he do ?

622 Shug  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:47:40pm

re: #611 Mich-again

All men who are fathers know for sure that their wife's mental health can and will be negatively affected by having a child at least for some period of time. That is a pretty big loophole.

big enough to drive a truck through.'

and big enough for Tiller

623 JackofTrades  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 9:55:17pm

re: #604 ShanghaiEd

Amen. That verse, however, was not among my church's favorites, because it clearly applied to other denominations. :)

And thus the loophole in the belief of once-saved, always saved. Anyone can claim to be pretty much anything they want. (Any doubts on this, listen to political viewpoints of candidates around elections, then compare with their actions both before AND after the election.) It is quite possible to claim the title of Christian and not be one. It is possible to claim the title of Christian and disprove it by living like the devil. Maybe it is a bad thing that "Christian" has not been used commonly as a pejorative description in thousands of years (at least outside the old Soviet Union, China, and extremist Islamic regimes). It is, in many circles, quite fashionable to "be a Christian". Simply claiming the name, nor even believing it to fit, makes it true.

Now will I say dogmatically that these people are NOT Christians? No. What I will say with a good deal of certainty is that they are not living or acting like Christians, if they are such.

624 MrPaulRevere  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 10:07:39pm

Randall Terry should be arrested. Find a reason after you get him into the station. This incitement to murder must cease immediately.

625 ShanghaiEd  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 10:11:37pm

re: #617 avspatti

That passage is terrifying imo.

Yes, it is terrifying. Along with the "depart from me, ye workers of iniquity..."

626 DANEgerus  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 10:23:00pm

Now... we have a "poster-child".

627 LotharBot  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 10:30:42pm

re: #598 ShanghaiEd

Yes. My denomination quoted this verse, but pointed out it had nothing to do with salvation...only with the "rewards" one will get (if any) in heaven. The clincher, they argued, was Ephesians 2:8-9 (emphasis mine),

Don't just read two verses; read the whole argument. Ephesians 2 as a whole is about how we were dead in our sins, unable to do anything but gratify our own sinful nature, until God made us alive in Christ, by faith (and not works), so that we may move away from our sinful nature and begin to do good works. Sin is the problem; Faith is the mechanism through which we are saved; Works are the result. Verse 10 reads:

For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

Clearly, works are expected... but not as the means of salvation, only as the result.

628 soccermom  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 10:33:07pm

Thanks for posting this, Chris. The rhetoric on the far-right and the far-left is out of control. How is it surprising that Dr. Tiller was murdered in the over-heated atmosphere we live in?

629 JimK  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 10:41:28pm

LGF said: "This is domestic terrorism in your face. It is the equivalent of an al Queda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks."

Look, al Queda claimed responsibility and Islamists everywhere danced in the streets. Osama bin laden promised more attacks and follows the Quran in promising to kill all non-believers.

From what I heard on this video (well, the first 4 minutes anyway), Mr. Terry did not advocate violence or vigilantism of any sort. He strongly advocated using his First Amendment rights including the right to protest to end abortion.

Your logic is so specious that it's difficult to know where to begin. I would have thought that a strong advocate of free speech would understand this. I am disappointed. Why don't you post some of the inaccurate and overwrought responses of LGF commenters to show just how radical and idiotic they can be too?

Disagreeing on abortion is not a license to lie.

630 mrclark  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 10:54:00pm

re: #628 soccermom

Thanks for posting this, Chris. The rhetoric on the far-right and the far-left is out of control. How is it surprising that Dr. Tiller was murdered in the over-heated atmosphere we live in?

Not surprising at all...unfortunately.

631 freetoken  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 11:03:28pm

re: #629 JimK

Why don't you post some of the inaccurate and overwrought responses of LGF commenters to show just how radical and idiotic they can be too?

The uglier comments on LGF get deleted, and the posters get booted. And "inaccurate" is a claim that can be sorted out with a fact-check-you-ass approach.

Do you disagree that there are people and movements within the US that are advocating violence against individuals or locations associated with abortion?

632 Salamantis  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 11:13:02pm

re: #629 JimK

LGF said: "This is domestic terrorism in your face. It is the equivalent of an al Queda video following a terrorist attack, disavowing responsibility but encouraging more attacks."

Look, al Queda claimed responsibility and Islamists everywhere danced in the streets. Osama bin laden promised more attacks and follows the Quran in promising to kill all non-believers.

From what I heard on this video (well, the first 4 minutes anyway), Mr. Terry did not advocate violence or vigilantism of any sort. He strongly advocated using his First Amendment rights including the right to protest to end abortion.

Your logic is so specious that it's difficult to know where to begin. I would have thought that a strong advocate of free speech would understand this. I am disappointed. Why don't you post some of the inaccurate and overwrought responses of LGF commenters to show just how radical and idiotic they can be too?

Disagreeing on abortion is not a license to lie.

All those thousands of posts on blogs celebrating this doctor's murder are equivalent to cyber-ululating, in my opinion.

633 SixDegrees  Mon, Jun 1, 2009 11:37:47pm

re: #624 MrPaulRevere

Randall Terry should be arrested. Find a reason after you get him into the station. This incitement to murder must cease immediately.

I believe the incitement to violence seen in so many of Terry's appearances provides more than enough reason to arrest him. It is explicitly illegal. Terry has been cited for incitement in the past and has been ordered to remove much of his loathsome material from websites as a consequence. It is certainly long past time charges and prosecution against him were pursued even more aggressively.

RICO may apply here, given the mutual encouragement of such acts by Terry and his followers. I would love to see him charged with conspiracy to commit murder. If successful, Terry would be able to spend the rest of his life in a completely abortion-free environment: prison.

634 muddywood  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:04:05am

Can you be Pro-Life and also be for Capital Punishment?

635 CrowScape  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:12:51am

It seems there's a coding error, as the video that displays does not show Terry advocating murder (although he does argue for the death penalty for abortion doctors, but that should still be acceptable political language unless it recently became illegal to discuss the application of capital punishment while I wasn't looking). Instead, he seems to be making a similar argument about language that Jeff Goldstein makes in regards to not letting the other side determine what rhetoric you may use. At first, I thought it was just me, and so tried it in a couple different browsers. However, reading the comments, I seem to be viewing the same vid JimK is. So, the link must be wrong. I'll gladly check back when it's fixed.

636 freetoken  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:16:09am

re: #635 CrowScape

Terry is feeding the religous fervor of those who are motivated to do violence against others.

637 JimK  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:21:56am

re: #632 Salamantis

All those thousands of posts on blogs celebrating this doctor's murder are equivalent to cyber-ululating, in my opinion.

I am still not seeing any logic here. Admittedly, I do not know anything more about Randall Terry than I've seen in the first four minutes of this video, but it seems grossly unfair to attribute the "cyber-ululating" of some radicals to him -- again based on what I've seen here.

Isn't that usually the same argument that critics of LGF make?

638 Gus  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:25:39am

re: #635 CrowScape

although he does argue for the death penalty for abortion doctors, but that should still be acceptable political language unless it recently became illegal to discuss the application of capital punishment while I wasn't looking

That is acceptable as political language and any politician is willing to take their chances. However, since you cite the application of capital punishment in these procedures can you show me some legal wording where this is the case? State or Federal sentencing guidelines will do.

639 JimK  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:29:41am

re: #631 freetoken

Do you disagree that there are people and movements within the US that are advocating violence against individuals or locations associated with abortion?

Freetoken, I honestly don't monitor their websites or other communications. I am pro-life (although not active in any protest movement) and I've never ever heard anyone call for murdering abortionists. The ONLY things I've heard are their attempts to change hearts and minds -- particularly those of legislators and judges -- to see the humanity of the unborn child.

But even if I grant that you are correct, Randall Terry hasn't said (in this video) any of things he's being pilloried for here in LGF. Other than his passion (or extremism or monomania, if you prefer), he was consistent that murder is wrong. I grant you that he is not overwrought with grief.

640 IslandLibertarian  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:39:43am

re: #634 muddywood

Can you be Pro-Life and also be for Capital Punishment?

Yes I am.

641 freetoken  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:43:51am

re: #639 JimK

Recommend you look up the history of Terry and the organization he founded, Operation Rescue.

From what you say... you've led a sheltered life. Over the decades I've come across a few people who were too, shall we say, zealous about their anti-abortion status, though none I knew personally had done anything violent (just passive resistance/ barricading type of things.)

Ask yourself this: how can violence be incited by words?

How many times does the term "baby murderer" have to painted upon a target before a not-quite motivated (and likely already anti-social) true-believer is stimulated into action?

It is one thing to call out abortion (as a deed) as immoral. It is another to keep calling a specific person (by name) a murderer who must be stopped.

642 CrowScape  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 1:02:46am

re: #636 freetoken

Terry is feeding the religous fervor of those who are motivated to do violence against others.

Well hell, if we're taking some of the blame off the miserable pile of excrement that shot Tiller and applying it to others, Terry's point about jurors being to blame for Tiller's death must have some merit as well. After all, the inability of the justice system to deal with the matter must have fed into the fervor of those motivated to violence. Heck, I bet some of those jurors are unrepentant too, and might even release Tiller if they had to do it over again. RICO!

Oh well, I'm just glad the founding fathers put that passion exception in the First Amendment. It's just not healthy having people feel strongly about stuff and voice their opinions in something other than monotone voices and dull words. I mean, terrorists do that! It is, of course, especially heinous when they call things as they see them. Sure, you may see an embryo or a fetus as fully human (despite the fact that we have a plethora of wholly arbitrary definitions of human being that can rationalize away the moral aspects of abortion, but hey, we'll give you a break just this once and not ship you off to the camps just yet), and so their death would be, technically, murder. But why, instead of saying Tiller committed "murder," can't you use the word "kiss?" People won't be prone to violence if you tell them someone "kissed" 6000 babies, would they?

Gus: quite frankly, I have no idea what the hell you are requesting. If I read your response correctly, then if I were to discuss, let's say, the institution of a third legislative branch whose purpose is to only repeal laws (good 'ol Heinlien) , I must provide some case law or something that shows a third branch had been instituted at some point, somewhere? In order for someone to advocate or discuss a change to the law, they must first provide evidence that the law existed in the form they are specifying? Seems to me that there would be a whole lot less diversity in legal systems that way, if you could even have a legal system at all.

643 CrowScape  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 1:56:55am

re: #641 freetoken

It is one thing to call out abortion (as a deed) as immoral. It is another to keep calling a specific person (by name) a murderer who must be stopped.


Indeed it is. The first can be ignored, while the second demands action. That something is immoral is not necessary a cry that it be addressed. There are many things that are immoral that we, as a society, tolerate. For instance, fantasizing about a three-way with the Olsen twins before they were officially legal is immoral, but no one was going to lock you up for it. There are even people roundly regarded as immoral that we have embraced because of their immorality, such as Hugh Hefner or darn near every rap star.

So, if you believe that abortion is the taking of a human life, the argument that it is merely immoral is insufficient, as we can live with immorality. It must be presented as you view it: murder. And, if abortion is murder, then, by definition, those who perform abortions must be murderers. To avoid this conclusion is to be a moral coward (or be unable to read a dictionary). If abortion doctors are murderers, then how can a person, in good conscience, knowing that abortions are being performed at a facility every day, not do everything in their legal power to end it? And yes, the law does allow people to be jerks and assholes, as the law should in a free society. To expect someone who believes abortion is murder to be restrained is to expect them either to deny reason or deny their conscience.

644 RexMundi  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 2:31:29am

re: #62 Mich-again

Sounds like an example of the "No good Scotsman.." argument.

Thank you for pointing that out! I hate that crap argument.

645 RexMundi  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 3:04:42am

re: #88 Jim in Virginia

Walter, I'm willing to stretch my definition of a Christian pretty widely but anyone who advocates murder, no matter what else he claims to belive, is not a follower of Jesus Christ.

Disagree with you there. Read how Jesus did not seek to overturn the Old Testament's laws--Matthew 5:17. He talks about how most people will go to Hell in Matthew 7:13-14. Plenty of other instances, just in Matthew, of Jesus and his willingness to be cruel and vicious. Read 10:28, 10:34-36, 11:20-24. Lots of 'weeping and gnashing of teeth' going on in that book alone. Romans 1:31-32 has unkind things to say about homosexuals. I could go on, but the bible itself damns it all enough with what I've already stated.

646 freetoken  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 3:21:10am

re: #643 CrowScape

To expect someone who believes abortion is murder to be restrained is to expect them either to deny reason or deny their conscience.

Then you believe that Roeder ought not have been restrained?

You also believe it is appropriate to encourage the Roeder-types to hunt down those involved in abortions by calling out the names of the individuals repeatedly as doing that very crime which, as you claim, a reasonable person with a "conscience" must act upon?

647 freetoken  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 3:25:57am

re: #642 CrowScape

Well hell, if we're taking some of the blame off the miserable pile of excrement that shot Tiller and applying it to others, [...]

I did no such thing.

648 elclynn  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 4:06:05am

There's ALWAYS the one little word which says it all, condemn the action "but"...

649 avspatti  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 6:47:14am

re: #624 MrPaulRevere

Randall Terry should be arrested. Find a reason after you get him into the station. This incitement to murder must cease immediately.

How lawful of you.

650 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 7:48:09am

re: #637 JimK

I am still not seeing any logic here. Admittedly, I do not know anything more about Randall Terry than I've seen in the first four minutes of this video, but it seems grossly unfair to attribute the "cyber-ululating" of some radicals to him -- again based on what I've seen here.

Isn't that usually the same argument that critics of LGF make?

I am not attributing the cyber-ululating to the sick slimeball Randall Terry; I am attributing it to Dr. Tiller's murder, and the twisted assholes who are publicly celebrating that murder in literally thousands of celebratory blog posts. Which is exactly what I said in my post #632, referenced below, to which your above quoted comment was a reply:

"All those thousands of posts on blogs celebrating this doctor's murder are equivalent to cyber-ululating, in my opinion."

So the question then becomes: can you fucking read?

651 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 7:52:13am

OK; I watched the whole thing. Didn't hear a raised voice; did not see or hear advocacy of violence. To use a phrase popular here, I think there is some hyperventilation going on over this. This is not terrorism, by any stretch. It is not a claim of having perpetrated an act of terrorism, violence, revenge - or, in fact, any act at all.

It is first a disclaimer of an act - a clear disclaimer. And it is second a plea that values not be compromised in the face of a public relations campaign sure to come already underway.

OK, he calls Tiller a "mass murderer" - that's a bit tough. But if you believe that a human fetus is, in fact, a human being, then the appellation is - like it or not - correct. So is the "evil" tag - in light of the extreme nature of many of Tiller's "procedures". Note that Terry does not advocate vigilante justice - he just names names. You have a right to be offended by his speech if you do not believe a human fetus is a human being. If you are simply "pro-choice" (i.e., pro-abortion) even though you do believe a human fetus is a human being - well, you need to do some soul-searching; be offended or not - it's your call, I guess.
[It's also pretty "tough" to call Hitler a mass murderer; no one has, after all, been able to find the "smoking gun" that he knew - let alone ordered - the Holocaust. In the end, it doesn't matter a whole lot, because he certainly should have known even if he didn't - and that makes him responsible as the national leader.]

This is the kind of person attacked by the DHS report - true enough, but I think the argument can certainly be made that such an attack is misplaced, as Terry, in my humble opinion, is simply stating a reasonable position. Maybe not your position, but hey, that's what brown paper bags are for.

652 Yashmak  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 7:58:37am

re: #645 RexMundi

Disagree with you there. Read how Jesus did not seek to overturn the Old Testament's laws--Matthew 5:17. He talks about how most people will go to Hell in Matthew 7:13-14. Plenty of other instances, just in Matthew, of Jesus and his willingness to be cruel and vicious. Read 10:28, 10:34-36, 11:20-24. Lots of 'weeping and gnashing of teeth' going on in that book alone. Romans 1:31-32 has unkind things to say about homosexuals. I could go on, but the bible itself damns it all enough with what I've already stated.

The book of Romans also cautions God's followers not to revenge.

653 Land Shark  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 7:59:47am

I understand where Randall Terry is coming from when he says Pro-Lifers shouldn't allow the murder of the doctor to intimidate them or throw them off message. After all, most Pro-Life people would never think of committing murder for any reason.

However, I would advise him and "Pro-Life Leaders" that they must be vigilant and aware that there's people in the Pro-Life movement who do believe murdering abortion providers is an option and that God approves of it. They have a responsibility to speak out against those who would violate God's laws by resorting to murder. They need to be prepared to contact law enforcement if they know of someone plotting to commit any violence against abortion providers. And they need to recognize that over heated rhetoric and dehumanization of people may well inspire some less stable types to commit violence even if they didn't intend that to happen. The people who favor abortion already dehumanize unborn children enough, do not resort to that tactic in response. Make the argument for the unborn children, not against people who believe in abortion. Terry needs to understand that when he says things like "he reaped what he sowed", he's encouraging wacko types to commit evil, regardless of his intent. Words do have meaning.

654 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:03:22am

re: #653 Land Shark

* * *

I would advise him and "Pro-Life Leaders" that they must be vigilant and aware that there's people in the Pro-Life movement who do believe murdering abortion providers is an option and that God approves of it. They have a responsibility to speak out against those who would violate God's laws by resorting to murder. They need to be prepared to contact law enforcement if they know of someone plotting to commit any violence against abortion providers. And they need to recognize that over heated rhetoric and dehumanization of people may well inspire some less stable types to commit violence even if they didn't intend that to happen. . . .

More than anyone else? They have a special responsibility? How does that happen?

If you just mean, the same as anyone else, I agree.

655 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:05:32am

What angers me most in this category of debate is not that some hold a strong religious conviction regarding what is life and what is allowed to deal with it, I think my life experiences allow me to understand that even while I may differ in details. What I don't accept is the one sidedness of the position which totally seems to ignore the human tragedy that is usually involved, beyond the issue of a potential life.

O'Reilly, for example, quotes large numbers of abortions as if every single one would have been a viable birth, regardless of circumstances.

Late term abortions are always tragic circumstances with little if any chance of survival of the fetus and even if one single exception can be found to that it changes nothing regarding all the rest.

I would be much more sympathetic to the dogmatic anti abortionists if every single one of them would volunteer to adopt and care for and pay for every unwanted pregnancy, whether through carelessness or rape or gross malformation, even if subsequent death and suffering are inevitable.

They should also provide the same support, if only financial, to the post natal care of the mother or other family member affected, including death benefits if the mother dies.

Fat chance//

656 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:05:38am

re: #652 Yashmak

The book of Romans also cautions God's followers not to revenge.

Does it say God's followers should not reject violence upon the helpless? Does it say God's followers should condone with silence?

657 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:08:08am

re: #655 Naso Tang

There are many circumstances in life where there are no good option - when the context of one's actions already dictates tragedy regardless of choice. So, does that mean one should reject his values in order to avoid ruffling some else's feathers?

658 Land Shark  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:20:52am

re: #654 auldtrafford

I agree, everyone with an opinion on the subject (and even if they have no opinion) should speak out against it. It's only common sense.

But also Pro-Life leaders need to be aware of what's going on in their movement as well, and how their words as leaders can inspire people to commit evil. It comes with the territory. Certainly if I was a Pro-Life leader I would feel a responsibility to speak out about it. To make sure nobody in my "flock" thinks for even a second that murder and terrorism are acceptable to me, and most importantly, God. I'd hate it if someone who followed me in the Pro-Life movement would go and murder an abortion doctor or bomb a clinic.

659 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:32:13am

re: #658 Land Shark

Well, he rejects and condemns Tiller's murder - expressly. Exactly how much more responsibility does he bear for making sure no one is "incited" by his rhetoric? I think that is his essential point: that people who advocate his position cannot be intimidated (into softening their arguments) by those on the other side who are ready to incriminate him (Terry) for actions with which he has no responsible connection.

And, of course, that is the contrarion's game: to build a connection and call it a "responsible" one. But I think we should be very cautious about jumping on that bandwagon - especially when we criticize others for jumping on other bandwagons.

660 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:37:46am

re: #657 auldtrafford

There are many circumstances in life where there are no good option - when the context of one's actions already dictates tragedy regardless of choice. So, does that mean one should reject his values in order to avoid ruffling some else's feathers?

No, there are always choices, even if difficult or unpleasant. You are advocating compounding tragedy, in many cases, because it suits your personal values. The fact that you can dismiss such circumstances by describing them as "ruffling feathers" proves my point.

661 Lawrence Schmerel  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:44:13am

Charles:

I am wondering why you added the "comments" tag on this post and some previous posts about Roeder.

662 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:48:28am

re: #660 Naso Tang

The "choice" I am talking about here is Terry's choice to continue using "inflammatory" (in your view, apparently; not, necessarily, my view) rhetoric. Regardless of his choice, Tiller is still dead - murdered by someone whose act we reject. So, Terry's decision to continue his stongly-worded advocacy will come in a tragic context (Tiller's death) - whether he chooses to accommodate your sensitivities or not. So, must he choose to back off in order to avoid ruffling your feathers?

Tiller's death cannot be undone, and that is tragic. I do not advocate "compounding" that tragedy; in fact, I don't even see how that is a real issue when you focus on the specific choice in question - unless it is compounded by offending you.

663 Cato  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:54:02am

re: #24 Charles

If the blind shiek can be arrested on a "hub and spoke" conspiracy theory, so can this d-bag.

664 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:57:28am

re: #662 auldtrafford

We seem to be talking about somewhat different issues. You are talking about Randall Terry (I think I earlier called him Terry Randall) and what he should be saying. I'm talking about what I consider self serving hypocrisy of dogmatic anti abortionists, and late term abortion in particular.

665 Land Shark  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 8:59:49am

re: #659 auldtrafford

He does condemn it, but then he goes on to say "he reaped what he sowed." In a backhanded sort of way it implies "he got what was coming to him." A less stable person could easily infer he secretly approves of it, or worst, God approves of it.

I don't hold him in any way responsible, unless someone can produce evidence of him inciting violence. However, as a Pro-Life person, I do see it as our responsibility, perhaps even a special responsibility to speak out against violence against abortion providers. Pro-Life leaders are in a position to influence people to follow them in opposition to abortion. They are "in the business", so to speak. Abortion is a powerful issue that taps some very raw emotions in people, if a Pro-Life leader wants to inspire people to oppose abortion, he/she needs to recognize that he may inadvertently inspire some people to go beyond that and commit violence. It's the basic reality of the situation which can not be ignored. There's already been murders and bombings committed.

Even if Pro-Life leaders speak out against violence there's always going to be nut jobs who still believe they can do God's work through violence. But they may be able to convince some not to do it. That reason alone justifies speaking out.

666 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:04:30am

Antiabortionists can work to end abortion in the US if they wish, but it isn't going to happen. The Supreme Court will never be packed enough to end it unless it is packed with judges who would also recloset gays and mandate the teaching of creationism in public high schools, because socons tend to share these values, and such rulings - all three of them - would be disastrous for citizens of this country, whether they be women, gay, or children seeking ducation, and would result in a citizen's revolt. Of course, such a revolt is what some of the fringe culture warrior socons desire, so they can exterminate, with extreme prejudice, those with whom they disagree, and institute their version of sharia in this nation. They basically are pushing to get their repressive reactionary agenda codified into law so that the law, and thus the military's guns, would be on their side; right now, they're not. All they are doing is indulging in savage jihadist fantasies; there's not a snowball's chance in the center of the sun that they will ever be able to reify them.

If antiabortionists truly want to prevent the maximum number of abortions instead of attacking infidels, they need to morph from being antiabortionists into being prolifers. They need to stop the rhetorical demonization and dehumanization of abortion doctors, which leads to their murder as surely as the blood libel leads to the murder of Jews ( a fact that many of the sickest among them secretly or not-so-secretly celebrate), and instead concentrate on rendering the choice to bear pregnancies to term as attractive as possible, without militantly campaigning to remove that choice from women. Because they will never succeed in removing that choice; they will only suceed in inflaming the terrorist jihadis within their ranks into firebombing more clinics and assassinating more doctors.

667 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:15:23am

re: #665 Land Shark

What about the pro-abortion leaders? Should they be responsible for taking care not to advocate violence (against, say, the helpless unborn?). You are right: this is an issue that touches raw spots. But the reason is that it is a life-and-death issue; the most final of issues.

I'm a bit troubled that the pro-abortion people are free to advocate the death of human life (pretty violent death, too), and are also free to attack anyone "connected" (by whatever definition they choose to use) to violence against one of their own. Sorry, I heard Terry condemn Tiller's murder, and did not hear him advocate further violence; I think he's borne his responsibility.

As for the comment that Tiller "reaped what he sowed": that is a comment about Tiller, not about anyone else. It is not an advocacy of vigilante justice - no more than the DHS "right-winger report" was an advocacy against ordinary soldiers.

668 Charles Johnson  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:15:48am

Even more nauseating than the Randall Terry statement: that several people show up at LGF making excuses for him.

And even one advocating for the murder of Dr. Tiller. Because it's "a matter of conscience."

Retch.

Those people have lost their accounts and won't be able to spew their "yay, murder!" comments any more at this site.

669 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:18:13am

re: #664 Naso Tang

We seem to be talking about somewhat different issues. You are talking about Randall Terry (I think I earlier called him Terry Randall) and what he should be saying. I'm talking about what I consider self serving hypocrisy of dogmatic anti abortionists, and late term abortion in particular.

Yes, I thought we might be talking about two different things. Glad that was clarified.

670 Charles Johnson  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:18:19am

re: #667 auldtrafford

Are you a member of Operation Rescue?

671 SanFranciscoZionist  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:21:20am

re: #114 OldLineTexan

You were taught poorly.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit." (Matthew 7: 16-17)

Oy gevalt. Guys, there's two thousand years of this argument, and it is not going to be settled on Little Green Footballs, 'kay?

672 Cato  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:22:27am

My mother-in-law used to run an abortion clinic. On weekends there were an awful lot of the antiabortion crowd in front of the building. I often argued to her that the reason they were there is because of Roe v. Wade. You have to lobby the people getting abortions if you can't lobby at the state capital.

673 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:23:41am

re: #670 Charles

Are you a member of Operation Rescue?

To be honest, I don't even know what that (Operation Rescue) is. More specifically, no I am not - never have been & never will be. Nor do I justify in any way Tiller's murder.

But I do not defend what Tiller did, and I do defend Terry's right to advocate against violence committed by people like Tiller.

I do not believe in vigilante justice - by either side. I do believe both sides have the right to say what they think, even to the point where they offend. To paraphrase others, there would be no need for the First Amendment if there were no such thing as offensive speech.

674 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:28:35am

re: #669 auldtrafford

Yes, I thought we might be talking about two different things. Glad that was clarified.

I think my original post was pretty clear. Why you took a diagonal tack I don't know.

675 Charles Johnson  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:29:53am

re: #673 auldtrafford

Of course, no one has suggested that Terry's right to free speech should be taken away, have they?

Just as he has the right to spew his disgusting rationalizations for murder, and sly encouragement for more murder, I have the right to call him out on what I see as a vile, terrorist mentality. And judging from the response from readers, I'm not alone in seeing this as encouragement to murder.

676 Maltboy!  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:35:47am

I believe in the right to life and I'll kill any SOB who disagrees with me!
:)

677 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:40:12am

re: #675 Charles

Of course, no one has suggested that Terry's right to free speech should be taken away, have they?

Just as he has the right to spew his disgusting rationalizations for murder, and sly encouragement for more murder, I have the right to call him out on what I see as a vile, terroristic mentality. And judging from the response from readers, I'm not alone in seeing this as encouragement to murder.

No one - especially not you - has suggested Terry's right to speech should be taken away. What has been suggested by some is that his right to speech should either be limited, or that he should bear some form of liability for it.

I'm not aware of your having done that - and I absolutely agree you have the right to "call him out" (though I might quibble with the characterizations "rationalization of murder" [don't think I heard that, and I listened fairly carefully] and "sly encouragement for more murder" [ditto]). But I don't think those characterizations are entirely unreasonable, either. Don't think I criticized you for anything you said; if you took it that way, I did not mean to say that, and regret that you took it that way.

678 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:46:53am

re: #674 Naso Tang

I think my original post was pretty clear. Why you took a diagonal tack I don't know.

Your original post (#655) said in part, "What I don't accept is the one sidedness of the position which totally seems to ignore the human tragedy that is usually involved, beyond the issue of a potential life."

I thought you were referring to a perception that Terry ignored the tragedy of Tiller's death. I don't think he did that; my point was that - given the tragedy of murder - he had to make a choice about whether or not to modify the nature of his arguments.

I think perhaps the gist of your comment was not about that choice, and so I was probably talking about something that you were not.

679 Land Shark  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 9:49:51am

re: #667 auldtrafford

Of course, you raise a valid point, after all the result of Pro-Abortion rhetoric is the killing of the unborn. Unfortunately that's part of the situation we face, that substantial portions of the public have dehumanized the unborn to the point they see killing them as a "choice". But I don't want the Pro-Life side to copy their methods. Two wrongs don't make a right.

680 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:00:32am

re: #679 Land Shark

Of course, you raise a valid point, after all the result of Pro-Abortion rhetoric is the killing of the unborn. Unfortunately that's part of the situation we face, that substantial portions of the public have dehumanized the unborn to the point they see killing them as a "choice". But I don't want the Pro-Life side to copy their methods. Two wrongs don't make a right.

You are talking about two "wrongs". First, the wrong of killing the unborn; I absolutely agree with you that the pro-life side should not copy this method - should not kill anyone, born or unborn. Second, the wrong of dehumanizing - which is speech (at least here, not necessarily in all contexts - and I do not address those contexts). Here, I will quibble with you. I think it is within the bounds of reason to engage in speech which tends to denigrate the morality of people you believe (correctly or incorrectly) to be engaged in mortal evil.

Lest anyone infer something not there - that statement does not include the advocacy - or even approval - of vigilante justice on either side.

681 JackofTrades  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:00:46am

re: #655 Naso Tang

I would be much more sympathetic to the dogmatic anti abortionists if every single one of them would volunteer to adopt and care for and pay for every unwanted pregnancy, whether through carelessness or rape or gross malformation, even if subsequent death and suffering are inevitable.

Apparently, you haven't checked recently. There is a vast, and growing, support network out there for these women. There is also a vast demand for adoptions, so much so that even if every abortion were prevented and the children put up for adoption, there would STILL be a demand left over for adopting foreign-born children. (The waiting list can be years long at times for even a diseased or malformed foreign-born child.)

There are also pro-life groups and organizations in place that make it so that the mother need suffer no financial hardship in carrying to term.

In terms of supply and demand, or terms of financial capability, there simply ARE no 'unwanted pregnancies' or a pregnancy that 'cannot be afforded financially'. You don't see or hear too much of these groups because the media is too ga-ga over Planned Parenthood and NOW, who NEVER suggests life over abortion. If Planned Parenthood were SERIOUS about wanting to reduce the number of abortions (as they claim to be), they WOULD recommend to women the groups that provide financial and emotional support, as well as the groups that assist with adoptions. These are things they do not do. Instead, they suggest and push for abortions in women undecided, and push harder (including deliberate violations of the law) in cases where the woman DOES appear to be decided on abortion.

I would point you to the numerous documented cases where girls have come proclaiming ages well below the age of consent, and in cases, below ages legally mandating parental notification and consent...in every case, the Planned Parenthood clinics told them, after being told the age, NOT to tell them the age, refused to inform authorities of cases that would be statutory rape (of course, you may think that it is OK for a 13/14-year-old to be having sex with mid-20-somethings without parent's consent, but the law does say otherwise in EVERY state in the Union), and in at least one case, told the girl how to go out of state to a specific clinic to have the abortion done since she could not legally get the abortion in her state without her parents being informed. The minor detail, though, being that the state laws ALSO made it illegal for her to be transported out of state for said abortion without parental consent/notification, and those laws made it clear that abortion clinics could not assist in the process of breaking those laws or tell women HOW to break those laws.

Yes, a few on the radical edge of the pro-life movement violate the law AND pro-life principles to murder some abortionists, and there is nothing to be done but legal punishment and condemning their actions. (And legal punishment is there for a reason, and condemnation of their actions can be powerful.) To contrast, I would pose the theory that it is mainstream in the pro-abortion movement to violate the laws of the land, even if you do NOT see their abortions as murders as well. It is most interesting that while they talk and justify abortions in ways that suggest every 2nd or 3rd abortion case were rape and/or incest (let us not forget that EVERY unplanned pregnancy, the woman was raped by her dad/uncle/brother/some other male kin), they show a marked lack of reporting cases of incest or statutory rape (or even other rapes) to the legal authorities even though the laws mandate that they MUST report.

(Note: I am not justifying the killing of abortionists by pointing out that they break the law. Nor am I attempting to minimize the heinous nature of murdering abortionists. I am merely pointing out that both sides have a problem with violating the law...and the abortionists far more often than the pro-life groups.)

682 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:03:56am

re: #681 JackofTrades

Well thought-out and stated. Excellent points.

683 auldtrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:39:36am

Looks like someone turned off the lights; don't see any more new posts.

I see Charles dinged down the first half of my posts. Not sure what I said to offend; guess we've gone on to other issues, but I'm sure you have my e-mail somewhere if you want to continue the debate. Just curious: are you pro-life or pro-[whatever]? Since I asked, I should probably state for the record that I have difficulties accepting the practice from a moral standpoint - although I am not involved in organized religion; just think it's a poor idea, without much in the way of justification.

684 Yashmak  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:40:35am

re: #656 auldtrafford

Does it say God's followers should not reject violence upon the helpless? Does it say God's followers should condone with silence?

Nope. It just says what I said that it says, "never pay back evil for evil to anyone", and "do not take revenge, friends, but leave room for God's wrath". Those who would murder doctors such as this recent case are acting contrary to the teachings of the very book they claim justifies their actions.

685 hans ze beeman  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:43:21am

re: #667 auldtrafford

As for the comment that Tiller "reaped what he sowed": that is a comment about Tiller, not about anyone else.

Do you think Israel "reaps what it sowed" when suicide bombers kill innocent people? Would that be a comment about Israel only, not about "anybody else"?

That doesn't fly. It implies some kind of depersonalized law of nature, and thus evades human responsiblity.

686 hans ze beeman  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:44:26am

The next step will be that condom producers are killed, I guess

687 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:45:22am

re: #655 Naso Tang

What angers me most in this category of debate is not that some hold a strong religious conviction regarding what is life and what is allowed to deal with it, I think my life experiences allow me to understand that even while I may differ in details. What I don't accept is the one sidedness of the position which totally seems to ignore the human tragedy that is usually involved, beyond the issue of a potential life.

O'Reilly, for example, quotes large numbers of abortions as if every single one would have been a viable birth, regardless of circumstances.

Late term abortions are always tragic circumstances with little if any chance of survival of the fetus and even if one single exception can be found to that it changes nothing regarding all the rest.

I would be much more sympathetic to the dogmatic anti abortionists if every single one of them would volunteer to adopt and care for and pay for every unwanted pregnancy, whether through carelessness or rape or gross malformation, even if subsequent death and suffering are inevitable.

They should also provide the same support, if only financial, to the post natal care of the mother or other family member affected, including death benefits if the mother dies.

Fat chance//

Has been done.

688 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:50:07am

re: #655 Naso Tang

What angers me most in this category of debate is not that some hold a strong religious conviction regarding what is life and what is allowed to deal with it, I think my life experiences allow me to understand that even while I may differ in details. What I don't accept is the one sidedness of the position which totally seems to ignore the human tragedy that is usually involved, beyond the issue of a potential life.

O'Reilly, for example, quotes large numbers of abortions as if every single one would have been a viable birth, regardless of circumstances.

Late term abortions are always tragic circumstances with little if any chance of survival of the fetus and even if one single exception can be found to that it changes nothing regarding all the rest.

I would be much more sympathetic to the dogmatic anti abortionists if every single one of them would volunteer to adopt and care for and pay for every unwanted pregnancy, whether through carelessness or rape or gross malformation, even if subsequent death and suffering are inevitable.

They should also provide the same support, if only financial, to the post natal care of the mother or other family member affected, including death benefits if the mother dies.

Fat chance//

You do not, can not, know what the families affected by unplanned pregnancies have dealt with. Your post seems to assume that pro-lifers are people unaffected by life's difficulties and tragedies. You are wrong.

689 Yashmak  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 10:53:09am

re: #677 auldtrafford

What has been suggested by some is that his right to speech should either be limited, or that he should bear some form of liability for it.

I'm not seeing anyone suggesting the former, but rather I have seen plenty of the latter. We all bear responsibility for the things we say. . .and that's as it should be.

690 Cato  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 11:13:53am

There is, of course, this alternative view from Reason Magazine:

[Link: www.reason.com...]

691 AuldTrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 11:24:09am

re: #689 Yashmak

re: #677 auldtrafford

What has been suggested by some is that his right to speech should either be limited, or that he should bear some form of liability for it.


I'm not seeing anyone suggesting the former, but rather I have seen plenty of the latter. We all bear responsibility for the things we say. . .and that's as it should be.

Actually, there were some advocates on this thread for the proposition that Terry not be permitted (which, I guess, implies a limit) to "incite" violence. OK in theory, perhaps, but the question is: who gets to decide what incites violence?

And yes, we should all bear responsibility for what we say, but I'm a little uncomfortable with "If the blind shiek can be arrested on a 'hub and spoke' conspiracy theory, so can this d-bag [meaning, I assume, Terry]." [Cato, # 663] How about you?

692 ihateronpaul  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 11:39:48am

re: #691 AuldTrafford

who gets to decide what incites violence?

The courts. That is why legally a Klan group can call for the death of all black people, but not call for the death of a specific black person.

693 AuldTrafford  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 11:56:11am

re: #692 ihateronpaul

re: #691 AuldTrafford


who gets to decide what incites violence?

The courts. That is why legally a Klan group can call for the death of all black people, but not call for the death of a specific black person.

Oh. Whew, well that's OK then. Had me worried that it might be somebody like the Star Chamber. Oh wait, that was a Court, wasn't it?

694 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:03:17pm

re: #688 reine.de.tout

You do not, can not, know what the families affected by unplanned pregnancies have dealt with. Your post seems to assume that pro-lifers are people unaffected by life's difficulties and tragedies. You are wrong.


I do know what some families have dealt with. I don't know if you know of more than I, nor that it would matter.

However you should note that I used the word "dogmatic" when making my references. I don't apply that to those who simply say "I would never agree to an abortion". I also don't think that the issue of early abortion and late term abortion, as it is supposed to be allowed, are really in the same category. The former is a personal decision to terminate, the latter is usually an undesired decision to terminate.

Also, I should mention that the other day, when I said I was disappointed, I was not referencing your position on abortion, which I respect, but your misuse of logic by saying that your position was morally superior simply because you placed the word "for" in front of it. This only occurred to me later. I trust I am correct in my interpretation.

.

695 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:06:12pm

re: #687 reine.de.tout

Has been done.

I doubt by the hooligans in front of clinics.

696 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:23:44pm

re: #681 JackofTrades

It seems that you are largely concerned with reporting issues to law enforcement, or parents and lambasting Planned Parenthood. The reporting issues are a double edged sword, as you are no doubt aware.

As to adoption of "all" unwanted babies, I applaud those who would dedicate their life to doing so. I could not do so for many reasons. Perhaps you can.

In any case I do not believe that there are enough who would or could, nor that it is the solution in every case.

697 reine.de.tout  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 12:53:16pm

re: #694 Naso Tang

I do know what some families have dealt with. I don't know if you know of more than I, nor that it would matter.

However you should note that I used the word "dogmatic" when making my references. I don't apply that to those who simply say "I would never agree to an abortion". I also don't think that the issue of early abortion and late term abortion, as it is supposed to be allowed, are really in the same category. The former is a personal decision to terminate, the latter is usually an undesired decision to terminate.

Also, I should mention that the other day, when I said I was disappointed, I was not referencing your position on abortion, which I respect, but your misuse of logic by saying that your position was morally superior simply because you placed the word "for" in front of it. This only occurred to me later. I trust I am correct in my interpretation.

.

Well, I have no clue what I did to misuse logic. It certainly was not intentional.

But again, your disappointment or lack thereof has no bearing on my life.

I too know what families have dealt with, including my own family, and I can tell you, pro-life folks are not hard-hearted nor are we immune to the pains and difficulties of life or those difficulties brought on by our pro-life stance.

698 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 1:13:31pm

re: #697 reine.de.tout

Well, I have no clue what I did to misuse logic. It certainly was not intentional.

But again, your disappointment or lack thereof has no bearing on my life.

I too know what families have dealt with, including my own family, and I can tell you, pro-life folks are not hard-hearted nor are we immune to the pains and difficulties of life or those difficulties brought on by our pro-life stance.

You said you were For something, meaning anything else is against, as if that statement takes the high ground through your choice of words. It is not that simple.

Again, this discussion is not about your stance on a principle, it is about those who demand that all others take the same stance, willingly or not.

I have no issue with your statement above.

699 avspatti  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 1:41:57pm

re: #649 avspatti

How lawful of you.

Charles, I see you downdinged me for this comment, but if you read what I was responding to, the suggestion was clearly illegal. Arresting someone and THEN trying to figure out a reason that sticks is not lawful. I don't understand your position on my comment. Randall Terry may be a disgusting person, but what was suggested was NOT legal.

700 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 2:18:36pm

Let's get our terms right; we are talking about pro-choicers, not pro-abortionists. They do not advocate that women should obtain abortions; they advocate for keeping the procedure legal, so that individual women can make the choice for themselves whether or not to carry any particular pregnancy to term. Pro-abortionism is found in China, where the government mandates it after a certain low number of children.

Those who oppose them are both antiabortionist and anti-choice; by banning abortion, they hope to remove the choice to terminate a pregnancy from women, leaving them with no choice but to either break the law or carry their pregnancies to term.

And break the law they would, in droves, in utter desperation, and regardless of personal consequences. Just like they have before, before Roe vs. Wade. And once again, floods of septic and bled-out women would deluge hospital ORs and morgues.

But antiabortionists/anti-choicers seem to be okay with that. I'm not.

701 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 2:19:58pm

ERs, not ORs. PIMF.

702 jmctigret  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 3:32:04pm

Hi I am a prolife that knows some people active in the prolife moment and I can say they are saden by Dr. George Tiller murder as I am. After watching Randall Terry video it did not make me feel angry. Just my take of it.

703 JackofTrades  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 6:06:48pm

re: #696 Naso Tang

It seems that you are largely concerned with reporting issues to law enforcement, or parents and lambasting Planned Parenthood. The reporting issues are a double edged sword, as you are no doubt aware.

As to adoption of "all" unwanted babies, I applaud those who would dedicate their life to doing so. I could not do so for many reasons. Perhaps you can.

In any case I do not believe that there are enough who would or could, nor that it is the solution in every case.

As to reporting issues, those may be a double-edged sword, however, I stand with the rule of law. If the law is bad in some details and needs changing, then work to change it. Do not just choose to routinely break it because you don't like the enforcement thereof.

As to the distribution of demand vs supply, last time I looked at the numbers, if every child that was aborted was instead put up for adoption, the supply would still be so exceeded by demand that there would still be a waiting list, including on foreign-born children. There are very many now that want to adopt and could, except the waiting lists are so long they would be upwards of 60 and 70 when the child was finishing high school. (I have heard of a few cases where it would have been 80-85.)

Calling a pregnancy unwanted is as much a misnomer as some certain people merely calling thsemselves pro-choice. When you endorse abortions at any time for any cause, encourage abortions anytime the pregnancy was anything but deliberately planed and attempted for beforehand, and fight against informing of alternatives, nature, and risks involved, no label fits except pro-abortion.

This may indeed be a minority of people that call thsemselves pro-choice, but it is also one of the most vocal and politically powerful minorities in the country. It is also a much higher percentage of 'pro-choice' individuals than the percentage of pro-lifers that do anything but condemn the act of murdering abortionists for all that we believe that they are muderers. (Dealing with murderers is the pervue of the government, never of private citizens.)

For the rest of the pro-choicers out there, it is time to do a little soul-searching. 1. Medical science agrees that the 'fetus' is a distinct, separate, human life that begins at conception. (Start checking some medical textbooks, if you doubt.) 2. Scientific study agrees that this is a unique, distinct human life. 3. The prophets of your own cause, among the most informed of pro-choicers (including heads and founders of Planned Parenthood and NOW) label it the deliberate ending of a distinct human being, and say that if you don't have the stomach to face that, you should neither get an abortion OR support them.

I could go on, but let's cut to the chase. What we are talking about is a distinct, unique, separate human life. Abortion is not routinely an act of healing, or 'doing no harm'. It is a violent act that ends a human life. Consider this as you consider your support on one side or another. Remember, as a prophet of their own has said, if you do not have the stomach to face that, you don't belong in the cause. (And realize that once you step up the to truth of that life, abortions are every bit as tragic as the murder of Dr. Tiller.)

704 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 6:42:26pm

re: #703 JackofTrades

As to the distribution of demand vs supply, last time I looked at the numbers, if every child that was aborted was instead put up for adoption, the supply would still be so exceeded by demand that there would still be a waiting list, including on foreign-born children. There are very many now that want to adopt and could, except the waiting lists are so long they would be upwards of 60 and 70 when the child was finishing high school. (I have heard of a few cases where it would have been 80-85.)

Then why are there still plenty of kids in orphanges nationwide? Are they the wrong age? The wrong age? The wrong gender? Do they come with physical or behavioral baggage? I guess some pro-lifers are real particular which lives they're pro.

Calling a pregnancy unwanted is as much a misnomer as some certain people merely calling thsemselves pro-choice. When you endorse abortions at any time for any cause, encourage abortions anytime the pregnancy was anything but deliberately planed and attempted for beforehand, and fight against informing of alternatives, nature, and risks involved, no label fits except pro-abortion.

Wring. Check my #700 to find out why. Abortion clinics can be found in the Yellow Pages, but they don't haunt hospitals and knock on doors and drag pregnant women in off the street. And of course they're counseled when they show up on their own before any procedure, although the part about womens' mortality rate being higher from childbirth than from 1st trimester abortions is probably not mentioned by either side. As far as alternatives, there are plenty of antiabortion organizations that have addresses that they advertize as if they were abortion clinics, then pounce on women when they show up for abortions they schedule over the phone with them ("crisis pregnancy centers", anyone?). It's called free choice; deal with it, even if you don't like the choice that many women make.

This may indeed be a minority of people that call thsemselves pro-choice, but it is also one of the most vocal and politically powerful minorities in the country. It is also a much higher percentage of 'pro-choice' individuals than the percentage of pro-lifers that do anything but condemn the act of murdering abortionists for all that we believe that they are muderers. (Dealing with murderers is the pervue of the government, never of private citizens.)

I don't know about you, but I am damn GLAD that there are more abortion clinic personnel than there are clinic firebombers and abortion doctor murderers.

to be continued...

705 Salamantis  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 6:58:54pm

re: #703 JackofTrades

For the rest of the pro-choicers out there, it is time to do a little soul-searching. 1. Medical science agrees that the 'fetus' is a distinct, separate, human life that begins at conception. (Start checking some medical textbooks, if you doubt.)

A human zygote or embryo is genetically human, and unless miscarried (spontaneously aborted) biologically alive, but it is not a human PERSON. It possibly might achieve personhood in the future and it might not (fully a third of pregnancies are spontaneously aborted), but the rights of the actual present person involved - the woman, must in any sane and ethical universe take moral precedence over any rights of a possible future person.

2. Scientific study agrees that this is a unique, distinct human life.

Simply a restatement of point#1, and deserving of the same answer, so read my answer to it again.

3. The prophets of your own cause, among the most informed of pro-choicers (including heads and founders of Planned Parenthood and NOW) label it the deliberate ending of a distinct human being, and say that if you don't have the stomach to face that, you should neither get an abortion OR support them.

No, here you lie - at least about the 'human being' part. You cannot talk of a human being without talking of a present human person, and a present human person a zygote or embryo is most definitely NOT. But whether one carries a pregnancy to term or terminates it, one must be prepared to live with the consequences. My ex-wife knows something about that. She carried one pregnancy to term and gave the infant up for adoption, and aborted another in the first trimester, and for 30 years, it has been the pregnancy she carried to term which haunts her, and which she regrets not having aborted.

I could go on, but let's cut to the chase. What we are talking about is a distinct, unique, separate human life. Abortion is not routinely an act of healing, or 'doing no harm'. It is a violent act that ends a human life. Consider this as you consider your support on one side or another. Remember, as a prophet of their own has said, if you do not have the stomach to face that, you don't belong in the cause. (And realize that once you step up the to truth of that life, abortions are every bit as tragic as the murder of Dr. Tiller.)

But it does not end a human PERSON, because a human person never BEGAN. For you to consider an elective first trimester abortion to be "every bit as tragic" as the cold-blooded murder of an adult human being in the foyer of his church while his wife was in the choir renders you morally monstrous in my view.

706 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Tue, Jun 2, 2009 7:06:26pm

re: #703 JackofTrades

Mostly I think you are a spin doctor, and a bad one at that given the amount of BS and half truths, if not worse, that you spout.

If you want to say you are against abortion, for you, say so and it can be respected. Beyond that I'll go with what Sal says, to avoid repetition.

Goodnight.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Fly free!

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

MikeySDCA
5 Infuriating Things Nobody Tells You About College
58 minutes ago
Views: 38 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

researchok
'I Was Looking Forward to a Quiet Old Age': Instead, Etta Shiber, Helped Smuggle Stranded Allied Soldiers To Freedom
10 hours, 17 minutes ago
Views: 130 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 0

Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
17 hours, 58 minutes ago
Views: 135 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
18 hours, 50 minutes ago
Views: 149 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Michael McBacon
Kansas governor signs 'Shariah bill' to ban Islamic law
23 hours, 21 minutes ago
Views: 274 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 6

Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
1 day, 23 hours ago
Views: 575 • Comments: 8
Tweets: 12 • Rating: -5

MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
2 days ago
Views: 248 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Ascher
Israeli Who Saved Turk on Everest: You Never Abandon a Friend - Israel News, Ynetnews
2 days, 1 hour ago
Views: 316 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Haywood Jabloeme
The Harrassment of Patterico & Its Roots in Left-Wing Activism
2 days, 1 hour ago
Views: 547 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Curt
Brian Banks: (Video) Falsely accused of rape speaks out
2 days, 4 hours ago
Views: 292 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

 Frank says:

Great googly-moogly - you're gonna do it too!