LGF

more options

  

Advertisement

Ed Rollins: Palin a 'Shooting Star Crashing to Earth'

Politics | Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:45:57 am PDT

Republican strategist Ed Rollins says Sarah Palin has made a big mistake: Palin A ‘Shooting Star Crashing To Earth’?

On “The Early Show Saturday Edition,” Rollins, who headed up former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee’s 2008 White House run, told co-anchor Erica Hill that Palin’s Friday news conference “raised a lot more questions than she answered. Usually, at a press conference, you answer questions. I think the bottom line is you saw a shooting star come crashing to Earth.

”I think the premise that she doesn’t want to be a lame duck governor - there’s people like Mitch Daniels, governor of Indiana, (Miss. Gov.) Haley Barbour, Gov. (Tim) Pawlenty, of Minnesota - they’re all gonna run for president, and they’re finishing their job. The job’s very tough now, and for her to bail out at this point in time, I don’t think it is fair to Alaskans and certainly, I think, damages her long-term career.“

Stepping down hinders a potential 2012 bid, Rollins added, because, ”Most political people fight to the end. It’s now tough. She didn’t finish the job.“

Rollins pooh-poohed political pros warning that people shouldn’t underestimate Palin’s ability to come back from any position of relative obscurity into which she risks falling.

”You have to remember, everybody else climbed the mountain; she got put on top of it by John McCain,“ he said. ”We would not be talking about Sarah Palin if John McCain hadn’t picked her (as his running mater). So, at the end of the day, she’s still gotta earn her stripes.“ ...

Rollins contended that, ”She diminished the job of governor. I think, at the end of the day, I’ve been in the business four decades, I’ve never seen a governor ever walk away from the job at mid-term, and I think, at the end of the day, that’s what’s gonna affect her."

Advertisement

681 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 MandyManners  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:47:38am
2 Chicken Kiev  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:47:47am

hope not

3 budvarakbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:48:15am

Dream On

4 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:48:28am

re: #2 Chicken Kiev

hope not

Hope so.

5 Syrah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:49:02am

A sitting governor is always newsworthy.

Resigning was a huge mistake.

6 pat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:50:31am

. The relentless attacks on Palin's person both by the GOP elite and Democrats, her children, and the derision of the liberals for a retarded child took a toll. Rollins has no such excuse.

7 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:50:40am

re: #5 Syrah

A sitting governor is always newsworthy.

Resigning was a huge mistake.

Agreed. This is either defeatist or opportunist, anyway you look at it, a very bad move.

8 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:50:53am

"crashing to earth"....good grief...she's off to do something else, big woop...people get too deep into this stuff....now I would consider BOs performance "crashing to earth", and burning

9 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:51:25am

The GOP needs to work on it's ideological foundation before it can think of promoting anyone as a star. As I said yesterday- it's like looking to cast a role for a script you don't even have.

10 Fluffy Bunny  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:52:17am

Sorry Ed...you are wrong about Sarah Palin. My favorite line " Rollins, who headed up former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee's 2008 White House run....".
How'd that work out for ya, Ed?

11 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:52:34am

re: #6 pat

. The relentless attacks on Palin's person both by the GOP elite and Democrats, her children, and the derision of the liberals for a retarded child took a toll. Rollins has no such excuse.

Rollins is not running for anything. And in the least, if she really is walking away because of the attacks, then I certainly don't want someone who doesn't want to fight.

Hell, we had that with McCain.

If you look closely, you won't find anyone in the GOP who is fighting right now, in any sort of way.

12 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:52:42am

As I have said countless times, Sarah Palin is a quality individual who is not Presidential material. She has excellent potential to be a regional player in the GOP. I really hope she runs for the Senate from Alaska because she would do a fine job, especially on energy issues. I do not agree that she "crashed to earth" because I have no idea what her reasons for resigning are. But she has a special needs baby and a number of other family issues that are probably in need of solving. Once she settles all of them, we'll see what is next for her. In any event, I wish her well. She is clearly a good human being.

13 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:53:20am

re: #9 Sharmuta

OT - your speed better? Killgore's is, mine is?

14 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:54:36am

re: #7 Walter L. Newton

Agreed. This is either defeatist or opportunist, anyway you look at it, a very bad move.

only if she plans a run at another elected office...for any other reason who cares...nice gal, not presidential for a long time yet and now that seems out of the question to me

15 SurferDoc  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:54:56am

The Governor's Office was the only place she was vulnerable to significant political and financial attack. They were going to nickle and dime her to death until the end of her term. She has now closed that door on them.

People who like her won't mind that she resigned. People who don't like her will hate whatever she does.

16 William Woody  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:55:29am

A quick search on Google tells me that I shouldn't be all that impressed by Ed Rollins.

(Ed Rollins gives Obama an "A" for keeping country safe, Commentary: Bush still doesn't get it.)

His support of Ronald Reagan is to be lauded, of course, and his work for the GOP clearly suggests he has some common ground with the Republicans. But I wouldn't go so far as to suggest his one voice is representative.

17 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:56:10am

re: #13 Walter L. Newton

Yes- speeds suddenly back to almost normal.

18 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:56:33am

I'd like to see her gun for her smearers...take them to the mat

19 budvarakbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:56:37am

Huckabee's campaign manager -- what cred does that give him? -- Faux news is pushing hucky like he's a second coming -- we already have one savior -- we need a real person

20 Killian Bundy  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:57:43am
I think the bottom line is you saw a shooting star come crashing to Earth.

/think she even cares what Ed Rollins thinks?

21 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:58:01am

Yet another media frenzy right on the heels of Jackson. If I was an Alaskan I would tell her to drop dead, but as I'm not I will just say, go away.

22 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:58:11am

re: #19 budvarakbar

Huckabee's campaign manager -- what cred does that give him? -- Faux news is pushing hucky like he's a second coming -- we already have one savior -- we need a real person

RON PAUL!
/

23 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:58:39am

One dumb-asses (mine) opinion...

I'd like to see her not run for anything... make a pile of money doing speeches, screwing her husband and protecting her children. She can do some good without being an elected official (I hope).

24 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:58:41am

re: #19 budvarakbar

Huckabee's campaign manager -- what cred does that give him? -- Faux news is pushing hucky like he's a second coming -- we already have one savior -- we need a real person

the MSM simply cannot be trusted...they have an nefarious agenda...promoting political candidates is criminal

25 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:59:04am
"You have to remember, everybody else climbed the mountain; she got put on top of it by John McCain,“ he said. ”We would not be talking about Sarah Palin if John McCain hadn’t picked her (as his running mater). So, at the end of the day, she’s still gotta earn her stripes.“ ...

I take exception with this. Sarah worked her way to the Governor's office, and she had people talking before McCain selected her to be his running mate. But he's a Huckabee guy, so I'm not surprised he wouldn't want to give Sarah any credit.

26 Salamantis  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:59:49am

Well, Palin just committed nomination hari-kiri; people just aren't gonna nominate a quitter for the US presidency, no matter how vicious the attacks have been. Sympathy votes will not carry her over the top.

What deeply concerns me about this move is that it will have the effect of elevating Jindal's (and Huckabee's) stock by default. And we really don't need either of them to win the nomination, much less the presidency. But we don't need Obama winning re-election either.

I don't see Thompson or Giuliani making a credible 2012 run. I guess there's no option left for me but to climb aboard the Romney bandwagon. He'll certainly be well positioned to challenge Obama on economic issues, and his election would re-stiffen the US spine in the GWOT.

27 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:01:30pm

re: #25 Sharmuta

I take exception with this. Sarah worked her way to the Governor's office, and she had people talking before McCain selected her to be his running mate. But he's a Huckabee guy, so I'm not surprised he wouldn't want to give Sarah any credit.

Rollins is a Huckabee guy, so I'm not surprised either. Huckabee likely has his eyeballs on 2012 too.

28 jcm  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:02:04pm

I tend to agree with Rollins.

Unless she does something spectacular, her 1st unfinished term will be an albatross.

29 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:02:20pm

re: #26 Salamantis

Jindal says he's out.

30 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:02:37pm

re: #27 rightymouse

Rollins is a Huckabee guy, so I'm not surprised either. Huckabee likely has his eyeballs on 2012 too.

I'd rather vote for Jon Voight...good lord, Huck is a buffoon

31 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:02:49pm

re: #26 Salamantis

Well, Palin just committed nomination hari-kiri; people just aren't gonna nominate a quitter for the US presidency, no matter how vicious the attacks have been. Sympathy votes will not carry her over the top.

What deeply concerns me about this move is that it will have the effect of elevating Jindal's (and Huckabee's) stock by default. And we really don't need either of them to win the nomination, much less the presidency. But we don't need Obama winning re-election either.

I don't see Thompson or Giuliani making a credible 2012 run. I guess there's no option left for me but to climb aboard the Romney bandwagon. He'll certainly be well positioned to challenge Obama on economic issues, and his election would re-stiffen the US spine in the GWOT.


Romney is VERY Presidential. He was a succesful Republican governor in Massachusetts of all places. I would vote for him in a heartbeat.

32 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:03:04pm

re: #26 Salamantis

Me?

Romney/Bolton!

One for the money.
One for the kick-ass.

33 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:03:28pm

re: #31 _RememberTonyC

Wish I could have in the last election.

34 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:03:39pm

re: #32 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Me?

Romney/Bolton!

One for the money.
One for the kick-ass.

Bolton is way to smart to run for office

35 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:03:41pm

re: #30 albusteve

I'd rather vote for Jon Voight...good lord, Huck is a buffoon

Huck is all that and more.

36 Salamantis  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:03:47pm

re: #29 Sharmuta

Jindal says he's out.

Let us devoutly hope that it stays that way.

37 Ayatrollah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:03:48pm

I love how so many people don't get SP. Very clear to me she is legit and coming at things with a totally non-traditional way. Not such a bad thing when the DNC and GOP are so screwed up. All she has to do is say boo and everybody jumps, that will not change. I think you have to come from small town America to really understand her.

38 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:04:14pm

re: #33 VegasRick

Wish I could have in the last election.

Me too, Brother. Me too.

39 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:04:37pm

BBL

40 Fluffy Bunny  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:05:29pm

All of this "quitter" static is funny to me. People move on in the corporate world all the time, moving on to bigger and better things is encouraged, except, I guess, in the case of Sarah Palin. Time.will.tell.

41 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:05:40pm

re: #11 Walter L. Newton

It's one thing to fight for yourself and others but another to fight on when the people you are fighting for piss all over you just for you trying to fight for them in addition to your enemies. Add to that the fact that this far after the elections are long over she is still under constant attack with frivolous unfounded lawsuits and a press corp that is still searching for anything to bury her with. Perhaps she just wants to step out of the public life or at least get the attacks off of her family. Realistically if she were to run for POTUS she'd be running against her own party and all of it's enemies for a job that is hard enough to get even when your own party lines up to help... Maybe she just had enough and is a canary in the coal mine supposed Republicans should pay attention to...

42 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:06:00pm

re: #34 albusteve

I'm afraid you are right. I'd just like to see the heads explode.

Funny, the press talked about him with such a "Darth Vader/Cheney" meme... I love watching him being interviewed. (paraphrased) "That man uses his mouth purtier than a twenty dollar whore (and as honestly)".

43 FightingBack  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:06:01pm

re: #37 Ayatrollah

Small town? The people of her State elected her. And she quit on them.

44 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:06:13pm

re: #31 _RememberTonyC

he has excellent hair, a killer tan etc

45 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:06:35pm

re: #29 Sharmuta

Jindal says he's out.

Not out at all.

"Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and his state campaign group want supporters to end efforts to draft him for a presidential run, but the nationally prominent Republican stopped short of saying he won't seek the presidency."

Just asked that the draft committee disband so as not to distract from current work.

46 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:06:41pm

re: #36 Salamantis

Let us devoutly hope that it stays that way.

Jindal is like Palin IMHO. A regional player with a lot of potential to do good things, but not in DC. I liked how he took charge last summer when hurricane season presented some problems in LA. He was well organized and calm. But he just doesn't seem like POTUS material.

47 BigPapa  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:07:40pm

re: #26 Salamantis

What deeply concerns me about this move is that it will have the effect of elevating Jindal's (and Huckabee's) stock by default. And we really don't need either of them to win the nomination, much less the presidency. But we don't need Obama winning re-election either.

That's the essence of it all.

48 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:07:54pm

re: #45 pink freud

Thanks, Pink. He stands no chance, imo.

49 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:07:54pm

re: #37 Ayatrollah

I love how so many people don't get SP. Very clear to me she is legit and coming at things with a totally non-traditional way. Not such a bad thing when the DNC and GOP are so screwed up. All she has to do is say boo and everybody jumps, that will not change. I think you have to come from small town America to really understand her.

I think we are getting her very clearly now. A quitter. Or would you like to explain it to us?

50 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:07:58pm

re: #40 Fluffy Bunny

The speed with which the pundits gleefully jumped to say "she's done" etc speaks volumes about where they are coming from and are only the tip of the iceberg her ship ran into.

51 MJ  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:08:14pm

I wonder why folks are using the attacks upon her and her family as a valid excuse for resigning but still think she's presidential material.

Sorry, but if personal attacks affect you to the point that you have to quit, then what happens when NKor or Iran or some other enemy starts attacking the US?

52 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:08:15pm

re: #44 albusteve

he has excellent hair, a killer tan etc


and he's a smart, polished guy. Obama will never rattle him in a debate. Mitt will clean BO's clock in a "mano a mano."

53 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:09:15pm

Oh. Is it me? Or has Bolton trimmed his mustache? Kind of liked the Teddy Roosevelt thing he had going on there.

54 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:09:44pm

if BO is re-elected I will leave the country and join all those Hollywood stars that split when GWB won

55 capitalist piglet  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:09:57pm

Her resignation doesn't bother me one bit, for some reason. The attacks on this family (even on the little children) from the left have been incredibly vulgar, frenzied, and orgiastic - like nothing we've seen in the history of this country as far as I'm aware - and if she wants to give politics a big, fat F____ YOU back, I have no trouble understanding it.

No matter what she does, she's wrong, according to some people.

56 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:10:23pm

All this "she quit on the people of Alaska" stuff is a load of hooey. She had previously announced she was not running again.

Someone should actually ask the people of Alaska how they feel about this.

"She quit" is lefty spin. Nothing more. Does anyone actually listen to what she said? "Attack in another direction", I kind of like that.

57 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:10:23pm

I can't believe we're discussing this. Don't you people know Michael Jackson is dead!

///

58 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:10:48pm

re: #57 Sharmuta

I can't believe we're discussing this. Don't you people know Michael Jackson is dead!

Still?

59 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:11:16pm

re: #57 Sharmuta

I can't believe we're discussing this. Don't you people know Michael Jackson is dead!

///

Heh.

60 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:11:20pm

re: #49 Walter L. Newton

I think we are getting her very clearly now. A quitter. Or would you like to explain it to us?

that's just not fair at this point...she seems to be ineffective...let it play out

61 sngnsgt  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:11:35pm

The GOP better put up a strong candidate with or instead of Palin, or we're looking @ 8 years of Obama moonbats in Congress shoving all kinds of LLL, nut-job legislation upon Americans. And it better start soon, the LLL is already campaigning for the next 4 years. I don't even want to think about an 8 year Obama administration.

62 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:11:56pm

re: #6 pat

. The relentless attacks on Palin's person both by the GOP elite and Democrats, her children, and the derision of the liberals for a retarded child took a toll. Rollins has no such excuse.

Maybe, maybe not. But, if she wants us to believe that these attacks are just too much for her family to bear, does she think it will get any easier if she runs for President? And, what happens if she wins?

Palin quit. She gave up and abdicated her responsibilities of a job she asked for and was given by the people of Alaska. There's no other way to color it. She broke a fiduciary trust with the people who elected her. And, she dares to think she can persuade those same people to do it all over again, only this time with the most important job on the planet?

To use a military analogy, she's just a captain or a major who's resigned her commission, in the middle of a deployment no less. But, she expects to be named Chairman of the Joint Chiefs at some later date, just because she thinks she deserves it. No way.

63 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:12:09pm

re: #56 The Shadow Do

All this "she quit on the people of Alaska" stuff is a load of hooey. She had previously announced she was not running again.

Someone should actually ask the people of Alaska how they feel about this.

"She quit" is lefty spin. Nothing more. Does anyone actually listen to what she said? "Attack in another direction", I kind of like that.

She did quit on the people of Alaska ...and whether she runs or not has no bearing on this fact. She is Governor. She quit.

64 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:12:18pm

re: #57 Sharmuta

I can't believe we're discussing this. Don't you people know Michael Jackson is dead!

///

With all the media coverage and adoring fans, I was expecting a full recovery.

65 Salamantis  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:12:27pm

re: #61 sngnsgt

The GOP better put up a strong candidate with or instead of Palin, or we're looking @ 8 years of Obama moonbats in Congress shoving all kinds of LLL, nut-job legislation upon Americans. And it better start soon, the LLL is already campaigning for the next 4 years. I don't even want to think about an 8 year Obama administration.

After 8 years of Obama, even a Hillary presidency would be a relief.

66 voirdire  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:12:47pm

Yes. . . Rollins, that brilliant Republican strategist . . . He's picked up on the pulse of this one all right . . .

67 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:14:02pm

re: #63 pink freud

She did quit on the people of Alaska ...and whether she runs or not has no bearing on this fact. She is Governor. She quit.

yes she did...but why?...if she has become a political liability maybe she should step down...running the state is certainly not over her head

68 MJ  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:14:02pm

re: #65 Salamantis

After 8 years of Obama, even a Hillary presidency would be a relief.

Wasn't there someone named Hillary in the Obama Administration? I forgot what job she held because she disappeared rather quickly.

69 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:14:12pm

Didn't Rollins help with Ross Perot's campaign as well?

70 altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:14:14pm

To all the folk saying she didn't quit-

What do you call it?

71 capitalist piglet  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:14:47pm

re: #49 Walter L. Newton

I think we are getting her very clearly now. A quitter. Or would you like to explain it to us?

I have been agreeing with you more and more lately, Walter, but I have a different take on this one.

What I hear is, "You're a whore, you're kid is a pathetic retard that should have been aborted, your daughters are sluts who'd have sex with anybody, you're a f***ing moron, we're going to harass you out of office and bankrupt you with lawsuits we know are bullshit, we'll make t-shirts calling you a c___ and wear them in public...and then we'll call you a quitter."

Who the hell could blame her? Who else has endured anything like this in American history?

72 sngnsgt  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:14:53pm

re: #65 Salamantis

Ain't that the truth.

73 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:15:09pm

re: #63 pink freud

She did quit on the people of Alaska ...and whether she runs or not has no bearing on this fact. She is Governor. She quit.

Yes she did. But if she felt she could no longer be an effective voice and instrument for the government of Alaska, she was right to step down.

74 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:15:24pm

re: #64 DEZes

With all the media coverage and adoring fans, I was expecting a full recovery.

I don't trust any of it...I got one eye open says he's pulled off the biggest PR stunt of all time...

75 SurferDoc  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:15:26pm

Huckabee is an unelectable caricature. Romney is a Whig: A rich, white, Northeast RINO, and a Mormon to boot. The religious right won't bust their ass to vote for him.

The Republicans need someone who can energize the base and hang on to the rest of the party. So far, no one meets that description...but Sarah Palin has star power and the "little people", the ones who will never read a NYT op-ed, they love her. Love her. It is criminal stupidity to let that kind of star power go to waste. Take her, make her, mold her, package her and she could go a very long way, maybe all the way.

But the Republicans are not called the Stupid Party for nothing. They earned it.

76 Fluffy Bunny  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:15:37pm

Raise your hand if you have ever quit a job. Did that make you a quitter?
No, of course not. That job was a stepping stone to the next phase of your career.

77 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:15:44pm

Contrast Obama's treatment by the Press and his own Party to the treatment of Palin her own Party and the Press...
The O' would never have made it as far had they been reversed in treatment.
Working against the tide wears people out, been there done that she has my sympathies. I doubt that she'll run for POTUS after this, but only time will tell. The piling on of everyone would be interesting to watch if it wasn't sickeningly predictable...

78 Salamantis  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:16:10pm

re: #68 MJ

Wasn't there someone named Hillary in the Obama Administration? I forgot what job she held because she disappeared rather quickly.

I think Obama decided that she was part of the vast right-wing conspiracy and iced her outside the sycophantic loop...

79 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:16:14pm

re: #67 albusteve

yes she did...but why?...if she has become a political liability maybe she should step down...running the state is certainly not over her head

I have no dog in this fight Steve, but the people of Alaska elected her. She bailed. I don't care why. I certainly don't think she was compromised to the point of being ineffective as Governor.

80 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:16:22pm

re: #37 Ayatrollah

I love how so many people don't get SP. Very clear to me she is legit and coming at things with a totally non-traditional way. Not such a bad thing when the DNC and GOP are so screwed up. All she has to do is say boo and everybody jumps, that will not change. I think you have to come from small town America to really understand her.

I don't love how she is held up as a typical small town American, woman, with guts, as if that makes for presidential material. I know, like, and respect lots of women, and men, in that category, but I wouldn't vote for them as president of the USA.

I could see myself voting for her in Alaska, if I lived there, but I would be mighty pissed if she threw away my vote this way for her personal ambitions, whatever the hell they are.

Those who downdinged me above for saying essentially the same thing have tunnel vision.

81 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:16:28pm

re: #70 altermite

To all the folk saying she didn't quit-

What do you call it?


Getting out of harm's way and moving on.

82 sngnsgt  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:17:13pm

re: #75 SurferDoc

She surely attracts female voters, something the GOP really needs right now.

83 altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:17:15pm

re: #71 capitalist piglet

I have been agreeing with you more and more lately, Walter, but I have a different take on this one.

What I hear is, "You're a whore, you're kid is a pathetic retard that should have been aborted, your daughters are sluts who'd have sex with anybody, you're a f***ing moron, we're going to harass you out of office and bankrupt you with lawsuits we know are bullshit, we'll make t-shirts calling you a c___ and wear them in public...and then we'll call you a quitter."

Who the hell could blame her? Who else has endured anything like this in American history?

To be blunt? Almost any big-time politician gets hit with vile slanders and frivolous lawsuits by assholes.

84 Racer X  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:18:13pm

Sarah Palin scares the piss out of the left. Seriously, they leave puddles.

Why do they still pay so much attention to her? Why do the vicious attacks continue?

85 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:18:19pm

re: #71 capitalist piglet

I have been agreeing with you more and more lately, Walter, but I have a different take on this one.

What I hear is, "You're a whore, you're kid is a pathetic retard that should have been aborted, your daughters are sluts who'd have sex with anybody, you're a f***ing moron, we're going to harass you out of office and bankrupt you with lawsuits we know are bullshit, we'll make t-shirts calling you a c___ and wear them in public...and then we'll call you a quitter."

Who the hell could blame her? Who else has endured anything like this in American history?

I can't agree with you more. I wouldn't blame her for saying , "F*ck it!"

86 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:18:25pm

re: #79 pink freud

I have no dog in this fight Steve, but the people of Alaska elected her. She bailed. I don't care why. I certainly don't think she was compromised to the point of being ineffective as Governor.

I'm only staying open minded...it's folly to speculate really, there has to be more to it to make a clean judgement...it's the old benefit of the doubt thing for me

87 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:18:30pm

re: #63 pink freud

She did quit on the people of Alaska ...and whether she runs or not has no bearing on this fact. She is Governor. She quit.

Yup, she quit a lame duck post. So what? Why do you even care?

88 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:18:31pm

re: #71 capitalist piglet

I have been agreeing with you more and more lately, Walter, but I have a different take on this one.

What I hear is, "You're a whore, you're kid is a pathetic retard that should have been aborted, your daughters are sluts who'd have sex with anybody, you're a f***ing moron, we're going to harass you out of office and bankrupt you with lawsuits we know are bullshit, we'll make t-shirts calling you a c___ and wear them in public...and then we'll call you a quitter."

Who the hell could blame her? Who else has endured anything like this in American history?

I'm not even coming close to putting her down when I use the word quit. But that's what she did. I've made decisions to take highroads and walk away from certain situations in the past.

Did it for my sanity and well being. And perhaps she is doing that too.

But, just as mush as my walking away indicates what I can or won't put up with, or deal with, well, the same can be said for her.

So, on a personal level, probably a good move on her part, on an executive political level, she quit, bad move.

We should understand the difference.

89 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:19:02pm

She quit. As to why? Only Gov. Palin knows. The frivolous lawsuits were getting out of hand. The constant barrage of mega negative comments from the msm and other talking heads had to take a toll. Wish she'd of stuck out her term though.

90 Salem  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:19:06pm

Obsession is such an ugly thing.

91 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:19:16pm

re: #71 capitalist piglet

Who the hell could blame her? Who else has endured anything like this in American history?

I amazed that we, as Americans, demand that candidates accept and tolerate behavior towards themselves and their families that we ourselves, would not.

92 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:19:30pm

re: #75 SurferDoc


Romney is a Whig: A rich, white, Northeast RINO, and a Mormon to boot. The religious right won't bust their ass to vote for him.

i think Romney will appeal to more Christians than he turns off. And the religious right as you call it will give Romney a fair shake after 4 years of the current administration. I do agree with you on Huckabee. He's a glorified snake oil peddler.

93 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:19:31pm

re: #71 capitalist piglet

I have been agreeing with you more and more lately, Walter, but I have a different take on this one.

What I hear is, "You're a whore, you're kid is a pathetic retard that should have been aborted, your daughters are sluts who'd have sex with anybody, you're a f***ing moron, we're going to harass you out of office and bankrupt you with lawsuits we know are bullshit, we'll make t-shirts calling you a c___ and wear them in public...and then we'll call you a quitter."

Who the hell could blame her? Who else has endured anything like this in American history?


I might agree with you, and her, on that IF she had simply come out and said that she was quitting because of the toll it was all taking on her family.

She didn't say that did she? Instead she is playing coy with the political aspect, and that I don't respect.

94 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:19:47pm

We don't know why she quit. Quite a lot of people are assigning a negative conatation to it. Quite a lot of the people who assign a negative connatation to Sarah Palin withdrawing from the clown-dunking booth she found herself in, didn't like her anyway. Something about being a punching bag must have rubbed her the wrong way, especially since the state of Alaska was bearing the liability and the cost of these petty antagonists. Now comes the whining because she won't hold still and take a kicking.

She sure is dumb. Her political carreer is completely over.


Yew betcha.

95 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:20:22pm

I'm going IN to work ... see y'all later!

96 capitalist piglet  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:20:23pm

re: #83 altermite

To be blunt? Almost any big-time politician gets hit with vile slanders and frivolous lawsuits by assholes.

Well, name one who has been called a c*** in public. Name one with a disabled child whose life has already been made vile blog fodder. Name one whose underage daughter was the punchline of a sex joke on national fucking television.

Help me out here.

I'll tell you what's bullshit. Acting like this is equivalent to what any Democrat has gone through.

97 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:20:30pm

re: #90 Salem

Obsession is such an ugly thing.

You keep saying that, over and over.
/

98 voirdire  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:20:47pm

She drops lame-duck status like a hot potato. Moves on with her life and doesn't care what you think. No time to screw around just lookin' for what's next. (And she could care less about the jokes)

99 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:21:16pm

such a mysterious, complex life we lead...nothing is for certain in these trying times...we are but one sheaf in the entire toilet paper roll of life....

100 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:21:30pm

Don't forget the half mil lawsuits she has attracted just for standing up. Sick ass shit, that is.

101 SurferDoc  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:21:34pm

Er,um, didn't Hillary Clinton quit as NY Senator after promising to serve her term?

102 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:21:57pm

re: #83 altermite
No one, not even Nixon put up with this level of hostility and hatred. The msm likes most any 3rd world dictator than Sarah Palin. You as a public figure, senator, rep, pres, etc..are fair game. Families are supposed to be off limits. Not this time, and this will probably become SOP for the left in future elections.

103 kynna  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:21:59pm

Ed Rollins. One of the people advising Huckapoo and giving us John McCain as a candidate. I'd love to kick his ass with a steel toed boot.

104 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:22:26pm

re: #83 altermite

To be blunt? Almost any big-time politician gets hit with vile slanders and frivolous lawsuits by assholes.

18 ethics complaints in the last 8 months. Each one takes time and money to defend. This isn't "normal'.

[Link: www.newsminer.com...]

105 Salamantis  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:22:31pm

re: #101 SurferDoc

Er,um, didn't Hillary Clinton quit as NY Senator after promising to serve her term?

I think she also lost a nomination race that everybody thought she was a shoo-in to win, too.

106 Racer X  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:22:50pm

re: #96 capitalist piglet

Well, name one who has been called a c*** in public. Name one with a disabled child whose life has already been made vile blog fodder. Name one whose underage daughter was the punchline of a sex joke on national fucking television.

Help me out here.

I'll tell you what's bullshit. Acting like this is equivalent to what any Democrat has gone through.

Right on.

107 jvic  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:15pm

re: #15 SurferDoc

The Governor's Office was the only place she was vulnerable to significant political and financial attack. They were going to nickle and dime her to death until the end of her term. She has now closed that door on them.

Not in these days of oppo research, computerized records, and media complicity with the Democrats. Remember the Bush drunk driving revelation in 2000? At least the facts were true. The 2004 National Guard scam was pure fabrication, and they might have gotten away with it.

People who like her won't mind that she resigned. People who don't like her will hate whatever she does.

And people like me, who are undecided? I can't picture a scenario in which I'd support her again.
*************
I'm still not sure how much of this is on Palin and how much is on the GOP for failing to look after their own.

108 Thanos  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:15pm

re: #103 kynna

Ed Rollins. One of the people advising Huckapoo and giving us John McCain as a candidate. I'd love to kick his ass with a steel toed boot.

Exactly, note how he doesn't just go after Palin, but also Romney here. He's running the Hapless Huckster again in 14.

109 Salem  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:17pm

re: #97 Walter L. Newton

You keep saying that, over and over.
/

That would make me obsessive-compulsive. Kinda.

110 snowcrash  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:21pm

I don't know if she has any future in politics but she will only be 52 in 2016.

111 jemima  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:24pm

It's so true. Like with that other guy who ran last year. The one no one heard of and whose chief accomplishment was voting present all the time. If you don't do what the pundits say, you're dead moose meat.

//

112 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:29pm

re: #84 Racer X

Sarah Palin scares the piss out of the left. Seriously, they leave puddles.

Why do they still pay so much attention to her? Why do the vicious attacks continue?

She also scares the pi$$ out of the entrenched Rep Beltway 'good old boys'.

113 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:29pm

re: #93 Naso Tang

She didn't say that did she? Instead she is playing coy with the political aspect, and that I don't respect.


Lots of respect for her before this moment no doubt...

114 capitalist piglet  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:32pm

re: #93 Naso Tang

I might agree with you, and her, on that IF she had simply come out and said that she was quitting because of the toll it was all taking on her family.

She didn't say that did she? Instead she is playing coy with the political aspect, and that I don't respect.

She said that her family voted on the decision, didn't she? That was the clip I heard on the radio. She said all but one voted "yes", and the one that didn't voted "hell yes".

Can you imagine what this has been like for them? If it was just about her, I wonder if she would have just slugged it out. To have put up with it this long satisfies my need to know she's a strong woman.

115 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:23:53pm

re: #82 sngnsgt

She surely attracts female voters, something the GOP really needs right now.

She surely doesn't attract female voters. She repels them. The exit polling was clear on this. Sarah Palin hurt the Republican ticket with women. I can't explain it, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Palin also hurt the ticket with educated, professional and suburbanite men and women. These folks used to be the staple, the bread and butter of the Republican party.

116 Idle Drifter  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:24:05pm

Gov. Palin's decision to quit as Alaska's Governor did take me by surprise at first though on reflection I can't think of a single defeated VP nominee that has taken such flak on a professional and personal level. If this her way of returning to normalcy and obscurity, well what can we do to stop her. If it's to concentrate on a run for the Senate only time will tell if it was the right choice.

117 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:24:47pm

I get the feeling I've heard all this before...bartender!

118 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:25:22pm

re: #115 JarHeadLifer

She surely doesn't attract female voters. She repels them. The exit polling was clear on this. Sarah Palin hurt the Republican ticket with women. I can't explain it, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Palin also hurt the ticket with educated, professional and suburbanite men and women. These folks used to be the staple, the bread and butter of the Republican party.

Link?

This is absolutely contrary to everything I've heard.

119 anotherindyfilmguy  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:26:41pm

Interesting would be if she ran for the RNC instead of POTUS...

120 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:27:13pm

$5 if you can name all of M Jacksons forlorn children

121 Salem  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:27:17pm

Pay no attention to the bozo who is actually destroying the country, lets focus on the media-raped woman who just wants to be left alone. Yep, that's cutting political discourse, there.

122 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:27:53pm

re: #121 Salem

Pay no attention to the bozo who is actually destroying the country, lets focus on the media-raped woman who just wants to be left alone. Yep, that's cutting political discourse, there.

DRINK!

123 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:27:59pm

re: #102 pingjockey

No one, not even Nixon put up with this level of hostility and hatred. The msm likes most any 3rd world dictator than Sarah Palin. You as a public figure, senator, rep, pres, etc..are fair game. Families are supposed to be off limits. Not this time, and this will probably become SOP for the left in future elections.

Then let's get with the program. Why are we being so nice? Hell, 100 years ago, candidates where publicly calling each other liars and cheats. All kind of charges and slanders were made in the yellow newspapers, there was almost nothing that was hands off.

So, hit back, play their game. It's the left who have blown so much politically correct smoke in our face (while they practice none of it) that we have become convinced that we just all need to get along.

Civil discourse my ass.

What happened to a fiery speech, a rousing rhetoric, a little populist condescending campaign ads? We've wimped out, while the left has been cutting their teeth on snark.

124 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:28:10pm

How long was President Hopeandchange a Senator before he started running for Prez? How many bills did he sponsor? I don't remember.

125 kynna  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:28:14pm

re: #41 anotherindyfilmguy

It's one thing to fight for yourself and others but another to fight on when the people you are fighting for piss all over you just for you trying to fight for them in addition to your enemies. Add to that the fact that this far after the elections are long over she is still under constant attack with frivolous unfounded lawsuits and a press corp that is still searching for anything to bury her with. Perhaps she just wants to step out of the public life or at least get the attacks off of her family. Realistically if she were to run for POTUS she'd be running against her own party and all of it's enemies for a job that is hard enough to get even when your own party lines up to help... Maybe she just had enough and is a canary in the coal mine supposed Republicans should pay attention to...

I think you're on to something. It's worth looking at the bigger picture here and thinking about what will likely happen to candidates who oppose Obama in the future.

126 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:28:33pm

Just for the record, I am not a Palinophyte or whatever.

I am just really disgusted by the complete lack of respect she has been shown from many corners. I object to the elitists in particular. They are trailer trash with a sophisticated vocabulary.

127 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:29:01pm

Governor Palin continues to expose the problem(s) with/in the Republican Party.

128 sngnsgt  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:29:18pm

re: #120 albusteve

$5 if you can name all of M Jacksons forlorn children

$10 if you don't, ENOUGH M Jackson, he's still dead!

129 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:29:42pm

re: #123 Walter L. Newton

Then let's get with the program. Why are we being so nice? Hell, 100 years ago, candidates where publicly calling each other liars and cheats. All kind of charges and slanders were made in the yellow newspapers, there was almost nothing that was hands off.

So, hit back, play their game. It's the left who have blown so much politically correct smoke in our face (while they practice none of it) that we have become convinced that we just all need to get along.

Civil discourse my ass.

What happened to a fiery speech, a rousing rhetoric, a little populist condescending campaign ads? We've wimped out, while the left has been cutting their teeth on snark.

dissent is the backbone of American politics...sometimes it requires less temperance and more ass kicking

130 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:29:49pm

Quitting in general is never a good idea in a career. Most of the "I told you so's" about Palin are from people who have an internal problem with a woman in the POTUS office, and a family value woman at that. It is something that scares people into irrationality. She's the wrong type of woman for them. Regardless that they don't really know that much at all about her. All we experience is the avalanche of snide insults delivered by the MSM. People apply a standard to her that they wouldn't apply to a President Bush or a President Obama. An abusive standard. Projection of weak doesn't help her, these people will abuse her more.

The news conference was a none starter for me. Nice scenery. She is attractive. I could see emotion in her. But I'm not too interested in vague analogies that don't really clear the air. I hope she has made a decision for something better in her restart.

131 Thanos  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:30:07pm

Charles; The site is much improved today, everything back to snappy normal response time, what did Hosting Matters find?

132 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:30:15pm

re: #113 The Shadow Do

Lots of respect for her before this moment no doubt...

Did I smell a sarc? I had no reason to disrespect her before, but she never gave me reason to think she was competent to lead this country. Sorry to disappoint.

133 harry91  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:30:35pm

I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. There is a ton of rmours out there that, for the time being are just that rumours, but do fit a larger story.

134 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:30:43pm

re: #128 sngnsgt

$10 if you don't, ENOUGH M Jackson, he's still dead!

NO!....128hr rule

135 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:31:00pm

re: #129 albusteve

dissent is the backbone of American politics...sometimes it requires less temperance and more ass kicking

Up ding to you Mathew Harrison Brady!

136 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:31:16pm

re: #118 Wendya

Link?

This is absolutely contrary to everything I've heard.

Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Republican voters say Alaska Governor Sarah Palin helped John McCain’s bid for the presidency, even as news reports surface that some McCain staffers think she was a liability.

Only 20% of GOP voters say Palin hurt the party’s ticket, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Six percent (6%) say she had no impact, and five percent (5%) are undecided.

Ninety-one percent (91%) of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin, including 65% who say their view is Very Favorable. Only eight percent (8%) have an unfavorable view of her, including three percent (3%) Very Unfavorable.

[Link: www.rasmussenreports.com...]

137 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:31:31pm

re: #128 sngnsgt

$10 if you don't, ENOUGH M Jackson, he's still dead!


Pay me in small, unmarked dimes....

138 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:31:57pm

re: #98 voirdire

She drops lame-duck status like a hot potato. Moves on with her life and doesn't care what you think. No time to screw around just lookin' for what's next. (And she could care less about the jokes)

There's a line Holly Hunter's character (Penny) utters in O Brother when she's standing her ground, no if ands or buts. "I've spoken my piece and I've counted to three."

They're not bona fide, Sarah. You were right to walk away.

139 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:31:58pm

I suggest we wait and see what happens. All these people with all these opinions ... most of them will be wrong no matter what happens.

Over a dozen scenarios have been floated by so-called experts. Most will be wrong. When was the last time anything worked out the way it was predicted.

Remember when Obama first appeared? He was an amateur that the Hillary machine was going to crush. Now the people who made that prediction are pontificating on Palin.

140 ladycatnip  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:32:17pm

#115 JarHeadLifer

She surely doesn't attract female voters. She repels them. The exit polling was clear on this. Sarah Palin hurt the Republican ticket with women. I can't explain it, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Palin also hurt the ticket with educated, professional and suburbanite men and women. These folks used to be the staple, the bread and butter of the Republican party.

Really? I think McCain is the one who hurt the ticket. All the women (educated to boot) that I know loved her. In fact I don't know one female who was "repelled" by Palin. That's leftist b.s. Repeating this over and over, well, people begin to believe it. Obviously she didn't do too badly with the vote almost split down the middle; I certainly don't recall Obama winning by a landslide - or maybe he has by now - if people keep saying he did.

141 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:32:24pm

re: #132 Naso Tang

Did I smell a sarc? I had no reason to disrespect her before, but she never gave me reason to think she was competent to lead this country. Sorry to disappoint.

Where does Obama/Biden rank on your competency meter?

142 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:32:44pm

re: #135 Walter L. Newton

Up ding to you Mathew Harrison Brady!

I'm a three time loser too...

143 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:33:41pm

re: #123 Walter L. Newton
I agree 100 percent. McCain and the let's be civil shit can go to hell. The one is a goddamn socialist, his policies are going to bankrupt this country, but lets be nice. BULLSHIT. Ted Kennedy is an alcoholic murderer, Robt. Byrd is a goddamn Kluxer, Pelosi, Reid ,et al are fucking crooks, Murtha is a traitor, Jon Halp Uz Kary is a fucking traitor, and my side wants to fight nice. Fuck that shit.

144 Sharmuta  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:33:58pm

BBL, Lizards. Happy Independence Day!

And- play nice.

145 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:33:59pm

re: #131 Thanos

Charles; The site is much improved today, everything back to snappy normal response time, what did Hosting Matters find?

Yeah, my connection to lgf is back to normal.

146 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:03pm

OT. Bought tape yesterday. On purpose, did not buy "Scotch Tape".

147 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:13pm

re: #141 The Shadow Do

Where does Obama/Biden rank on your competency meter?

I voted for McCain and guess who, but I don't want Obama to fail, along with the rest of us.

Does that answer it?

148 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:28pm

Update, Michal Jackson is still dead,
Ed Rollins still chews gum off republicans shoe soles....

149 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:30pm

SARAH!.....come BAAAAAAAAAAACK!

150 Killian Bundy  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:33pm

re: #101 SurferDoc

Er,um, didn't Hillary Clinton quit as NY Senator after promising to serve her term?

TOTUS was a Senator for a whole two years.

/and he spent all that time campaigning for TOTUS

151 Syrah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:43pm

re: #140 ladycatnip

#115 JarHeadLifer

Really? I think McCain is the one who hurt the ticket. All the women (educated to boot) that I know loved her. In fact I don't know one female who was "repelled" by Palin. That's leftist b.s. Repeating this over and over, well, people begin to believe it. Obviously she didn't do too badly with the vote almost split down the middle; I certainly don't recall Obama winning by a landslide - or maybe he has by now - if people keep saying he did.

Palin was the only life the McCain campaign had.

152 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:51pm

re: #147 Naso Tang

I voted for McCain and guess who, but I don't want Obama to fail, along with the rest of us.

Does that answer it?

Do you want his policies to succeed?

153 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:34:56pm

re: #143 pingjockey

I agree 100 percent. McCain and the let's be civil shit can go to hell. The one is a goddamn socialist, his policies are going to bankrupt this country, but lets be nice. BULLSHIT. Ted Kennedy is an alcoholic murderer, Robt. Byrd is a goddamn Kluxer, Pelosi, Reid ,et al are fucking crooks, Murtha is a traitor, Jon Halp Uz Kary is a fucking traitor, and my side wants to fight nice. Fuck that shit.

Ding, ding, ding, give this persona hot dog and a beer. Happy July 4th. That's what I call fireworks.

154 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:35:09pm

I'm going to a local "Tea Party". I'll hunt for Paulians, okay?

155 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:35:52pm

re: #145 Killgore Trout

Yeah, my connection to lgf is back to normal.

I think it was my fault. My modem died. Finally got a new one.

156 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:36:01pm

re: #118 Wendya

Link?

This is absolutely contrary to everything I've heard.

You can look around and find some other similar results and analysis, but here's one from PEW Research.

[Link: people-press.org...]

and a quote from it...

"In addition, Sarah Palin appears to be a continuing – if not an increasing – drag on the GOP ticket. Currently, 49% of voters express an unfavorable opinion of Palin, while 44% have a favorable view. In mid-September, favorable opinions of Palin outnumbered negative ones by 54% to 32%. Women, especially women under age 50, have become increasingly critical of Palin: 60% now express an unfavorable view of Palin, up from 36% in mid-September. Notably, opinions of Palin have a greater impact on voting intentions than do opinions of Joe Biden, Obama’s running mate."

This was a poll taken before election day. But, if you look at the actual election day exit polls, it's clear that Palin was a drag on the ticket for everyone but the base.

[Link: www.msnbc.msn.com...]

157 Fluffy Bunny  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:36:20pm

re: #130 hazzyday

"Quitting in general is never a good idea in a career."
Gasp! You mean I should have stayed a Piggly Wiggly cashier, forever? First job at 16.

158 ladycatnip  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:36:34pm

#124 Canadian Club Akbar

How long was President Hopeandchange a Senator before he started running for Prez? How many bills did he sponsor? I don't remember, I don't recall.

fify

159 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:37:18pm

re: #140 ladycatnip

#115 JarHeadLifer

Really? I think McCain is the one who hurt the ticket. All the women (educated to boot) that I know loved her. In fact I don't know one female who was "repelled" by Palin. That's leftist b.s. Repeating this over and over, well, people begin to believe it. Obviously she didn't do too badly with the vote almost split down the middle; I certainly don't recall Obama winning by a landslide - or maybe he has by now - if people keep saying he did.

Of the women I personally know (flesh and blood not only know online but face to face friends and family) who don't like Sarah Palin, they are all leftist. And nearly all don't just dislike, it is vehement hatred. I've never seen that side of some. She really brought out the dark and nasty on the left. A whole different story with conservative women.

160 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:37:22pm

BBL (or tomorrow, or sometime).

161 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:37:48pm

re: #143 pingjockey

I agree 100 percent. McCain and the let's be civil shit can go to hell. The one is a goddamn socialist, his policies are going to bankrupt this country, but lets be nice. BULLSHIT. Ted Kennedy is an alcoholic murderer, Robt. Byrd is a goddamn Kluxer, Pelosi, Reid ,et al are fucking crooks, Murtha is a traitor, Jon Halp Uz Kary is a fucking traitor, and my side wants to fight nice. Fuck that shit.

I have said all along....whoever puts their political career on the line and goes for broke will become a national hero, buy some time, make some speeches on the Capital steps...forget your hairdo and go out and take down T Kennedy and his gang...pound it and drive it home...bring all the facts and prepare to bleed or even die...nobody has the guts to do it

162 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:38:02pm

re: #154 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I'm going to a local "Tea Party". I'll hunt for Paulians, okay?

I'll report back tonight.

163 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:38:26pm

re: #159 Silvergirl

Of the women I personally know (flesh and blood not only know online but face to face friends and family) who don't like Sarah Palin, they are all leftist. And nearly all don't just dislike, it is vehement hatred. I've never seen that side of some. She really brought out the dark and nasty on the left. A whole different story with conservative women.

Bingo.

164 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:39:00pm

re: #153 Walter L. Newton
Sorry Walter, no I take that back I'm not. I'm sick and tired of Repubs taking shit. Thing is, I'm a Reagan/Goldwater conservative and at the moment there doesn't seem to be any or few on the right. The ones that are small c conservative are also (most of them seem to be) batshit crazy YECers, IDers, or other nutjob socons. Makes me want to run amok with a freakin' clue bat!

165 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:39:18pm

re: #154 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Have fun!

166 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:39:20pm

re: #79 pink freud

I have no dog in this fight Steve, but the people of Alaska elected her. She bailed. I don't care why. I certainly don't think she was compromised to the point of being ineffective as Governor.

I agree here. When you say you don't care that gets you wrapped up on the abuser side. Capitalist Piglet put the case forward of her unique circumstances.

No one in the history of the world expect for Jesus Christ was feted and worshipped like Pres Obama "by the media". Even though he is a NeoCom.

Sarah Palin was used as his foil. She was a target for all the worst in people on the same scale as Pres Obama. And she was given less support.

She has uniquely experienced something no one else in the world has. And has carried it pretty well. The resignation is definitely a result of these events. Whether it is a good thing or a bad thing for Gov. Palin is probably up to her.

Just the fact that she doesn't want her young daughters to be a target of dirty old pedophiles like David Letterman in the front page of national magazines is probably enough motive to move to a stronger place in life.

167 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:39:33pm

If this is a bid for the presidency it's strange and unprecedented. It will almost certainly not work. I'm still thinking she's bracing for a personal/legal scandal to break. It's the only way this move makes sense. There's also the possibility that there's a serious illness in the family or something like that.
If she was being honest about her reasons for leaving then her political career is over with. What if she gets elected into a public office again? It might be difficult. She might get criticized. Would she quit the presidency because it's too hard?
Either way, I think she's probably sunk for good. She could get speaking gigs for right wing crowds or a TV show but her political career is over with.

168 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:40:48pm

re: #140 ladycatnip

#115 JarHeadLifer

Really? I think McCain is the one who hurt the ticket. All the women (educated to boot) that I know loved her. In fact I don't know one female who was "repelled" by Palin. That's leftist b.s. Repeating this over and over, well, people begin to believe it. Obviously she didn't do too badly with the vote almost split down the middle; I certainly don't recall Obama winning by a landslide - or maybe he has by now - if people keep saying he did.

You'll forgive me if I'm not compelled by your anecdotal evidence. I'll take quantitative and qualitative analysis every time. If you can provide any data that supports your position other than "what your friends think", I'd be happy to review it.

Of the exit polls I've seen, most indicate that at least 60% of the people who voted on election day didn't feel Palin was competent to be either Vice-President or President. That's not helping the ticket, that's hurting hit. By comparison, those same polls indicated that 70% of the people (or more) felt Biden was competent.

169 sngnsgt  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:40:57pm

re: #143 pingjockey

Yes, drop the sticks and gloves, we got ourselves a real Hockey fight going on here! Clear the benches and both goalies skate to the center of the ice, time to throw down!

170 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:41:26pm

re: #143 pingjockey

I agree 100 percent. McCain and the let's be civil shit can go to hell. The one is a goddamn socialist, his policies are going to bankrupt this country, but lets be nice. BULLSHIT. Ted Kennedy is an alcoholic murderer, Robt. Byrd is a goddamn Kluxer, Pelosi, Reid ,et al are fucking crooks, Murtha is a traitor, Jon Halp Uz Kary is a fucking traitor, and my side wants to fight nice. Fuck that shit.

You should have ran. That does sound like what should have been said.

171 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:41:28pm

re: #161 albusteve
They all want the msm to like them. Asshats. The msm will never like any conservative. Hell, A. Lincoln could come back and the msm would tell him the Civil War is a quagmire.

172 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:41:44pm

re: #147 Naso Tang

I voted for McCain and guess who, but I don't want Obama to fail, along with the rest of us.

Does that answer it?

Sopmewhat, though the Obama fail thing is a bit of a strawman or perhaps just a meaningless reference. But that's OK.

I, for one, do indeed he hope he fails to deliver us unto Socialism though that does not seem likely at present.

173 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:41:52pm

re: #152 Wendya

Do you want his policies to succeed?

Not necessarily, but neither would I advocate opposing them (all) to the point of suicide. Our system is not winner take all even though it seems that way sometimes.

Unfortunately the loudest Republicans these days seem more interested in things like gay marriage, abortion, the good old days and, dare I say, evolution than formulating strong plans.

174 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:42:00pm

re: #156 JarHeadLifer

This was a poll taken before election day. But, if you look at the actual election day exit polls, it's clear that Palin was a drag on the ticket for everyone but the base.

[Link: www.msnbc.msn.com...]


Actually, it shows that black people voted for Obama because he's black.

175 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:42:39pm

re: #151 Syrah

Palin was the only life the McCain campaign had.

Palin certainly fired up the base, and gave him the "life" you speak of. But, the paradox of her selection is that she also sealed his fate as a loser. She alienated the people McCain needed to actually win the election.

176 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:43:01pm

headed out for the ABQ tea party....Adolf Hiter is speaking and I want to get an autograph if I can....he'll probably be mobbed by adoring right wing conservative but I'm gonna try

177 SFGoth  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:43:39pm

re: #164 pingjockey

Sorry Walter, no I take that back I'm not. I'm sick and tired of Repubs taking shit. Thing is, I'm a Reagan/Goldwater conservative and at the moment there doesn't seem to be any or few on the right. The ones that are small c conservative are also (most of them seem to be) batshit crazy YECers, IDers, or other nutjob socons. Makes me want to run amok with a freakin' clue bat!

That makes them big C Conservatives. Small c conservatives aren't nutjobs because being a nutjob is not small c conservative.

178 Tarkus289  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:43:58pm

It was not Sarah Palin that was a drag on the McCain ticket, it was Tina Fey, most everybody in this country thought it was Sarah that said she could see Russia from her house, she did not. Sarah Palin was filling up arenas without the help of free concerts, that the media never mentioned.

179 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:44:04pm

re: #176 albusteve
Heh! Have fun, take lotsa water!

180 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:44:39pm

We need a poll about why she quit. Depending on the choice, I'll probably take "none of the above".

181 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:44:54pm

re: #157 Fluffy Bunny

"Quitting in general is never a good idea in a career."
Gasp! You mean I should have stayed a Piggly Wiggly cashier, forever? First job at 16.

You could be VP in that back room customer service area customers can't get to by now. Quitting to move to a better opportunity is good. Quitting to languish on welfare checks is bad. I did the latter. It was a mistake.

182 SFGoth  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:45:00pm

re: #175 JarHeadLifer

Palin certainly fired up the base, and gave him the "life" you speak of. But, the paradox of her selection is that she also sealed his fate as a loser. She alienated the people McCain needed to actually win the election.

John McCain alienated the people he need to win to win. Frankly, I don't think any Republican could have won given what Bush and Congress accomplished.

183 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:45:02pm

re: #177 SFGoth
Crap. You're right, I think. Mangled metaphors.

184 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:45:34pm

re: #159 Silvergirl

Of the women I personally know (flesh and blood not only know online but face to face friends and family) who don't like Sarah Palin, they are all leftist. And nearly all don't just dislike, it is vehement hatred. I've never seen that side of some. She really brought out the dark and nasty on the left. A whole different story with conservative women.

Amazing isn't it? And the left's vitriol continues to this day. Maybe it's because she doesn't write crappy/depressing poetry and talk about how a woman is 'better' or more 'free" or more 'enlightened' if she isn't in a partnership with a man, especially if the man happens to be the father of her children.

185 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:45:51pm

re: #175 JarHeadLifer

Palin certainly fired up the base, and gave him the "life" you speak of. But, the paradox of her selection is that she also sealed his fate as a loser. She alienated the people McCain needed to actually win the election.

Those people alienated themselves. She just needed more Sarah face time with them.

186 Thanos  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:46:01pm

re: #161 albusteve

I have said all along....whoever puts their political career on the line and goes for broke will become a national hero, buy some time, make some speeches on the Capital steps...forget your hairdo and go out and take down T Kennedy and his gang...pound it and drive it home...bring all the facts and prepare to bleed or even die...nobody has the guts to do it

and if you flap your arms while you speak and sound exasperated and whiny you will be Ron Paul and pull 3 pct.

187 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:46:06pm

re: #180 HelloDare

We need a poll about why she quit. Depending on the choice, I'll probably take "none of the above".

How about a poll on those who think she owes everyone a clear answer?

188 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:46:36pm

re: #32 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Me?

Romney/Bolton!

One for the money.
One for the kick-ass.

I would support that. I would also support Palin on either position on a ticket. There are some I would not support. Huck and Jindal spring to mind, but apparently Jindal's not going to be in the running according to Sharm's link.

189 Syrah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:46:52pm

re: #175 JarHeadLifer

Palin certainly fired up the base, and gave him the "life" you speak of. But, the paradox of her selection is that she also sealed his fate as a loser. She alienated the people McCain needed to actually win the election.

They were not going to vote for McCain no mater who he made his VP.
Any presidential campaign that is hurt by its choice of VP is doomed to fail anyway.

The top of the ticket makes or breaks the ticket.

There was no reason to argue for why people should vote FOR McCain except that he was not Obama.

190 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:48:05pm

re: #175 JarHeadLifer

Palin certainly fired up the base, and gave him the "life" you speak of. But, the paradox of her selection is that she also sealed his fate as a loser. She alienated the people McCain needed to actually win the election.

Nonsense. McCain ran a crappy campaign and would have lost with a larger margin if it had not been for Sarah on the ticket.

191 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:48:08pm

re: #164 pingjockey

Sorry Walter, no I take that back I'm not. I'm sick and tired of Repubs taking shit. Thing is, I'm a Reagan/Goldwater conservative and at the moment there doesn't seem to be any or few on the right. The ones that are small c conservative are also (most of them seem to be) batshit crazy YECers, IDers, or other nutjob socons. Makes me want to run amok with a freakin' clue bat!

Yes a clue bat would be a good campaign product.

192 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:48:17pm

re: #189 Syrah
Yep. The message was murky at best. At worst it came across as democrat lite.

193 capitalist piglet  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:48:36pm

re: #189 Syrah

They were not going to vote for McCain no mater who he made his VP.
Any presidential campaign that is hurt by its choice of VP is doomed to fail anyway.

The top of the ticket makes or breaks the ticket.

There was no reason to argue for why people should vote FOR McCain except that he was not Obama.


Hell, by the time the campaign was over, I was wondering if McCain even voted for himself.

194 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:49:07pm

re: #159 Silvergirl

. And nearly all don't just dislike, it is vehement hatred. I've never seen that side of some. She really brought out the dark and nasty on the left.

Yes, she did. Personally, I don't give a rat's ass what leftist women think about a republican candidate. They will never vote for anyone with an R after their name so I see no reason to pander to them.

195 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:49:25pm

re: #146 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

OT. Bought tape yesterday. On purpose, did not buy "Scotch Tape".

No true scotch tape will stick to that crap.

196 Salamantis  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:49:38pm

re: #193 capitalist piglet

Hell, by the time the campaign was over, I was wondering if McCain even voted for himself.

McCain sealed his doom when he announced that the US economy was fundamentally sound right before the big crash.

197 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:49:49pm

re: #182 SFGoth

John McCain alienated the people he need to win to win. Frankly, I don't think any Republican could have won given what Bush and Congress accomplished.

That's exactly right. The last election was the Dems to lose. The country elected a man with no experience, a dubious past filled with despicable characters, and still they could not lose. I found it surprising the election was a close as it was.

198 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:49:51pm

re: #191 hazzyday

Yes a clue bat would be a good campaign product.

Seeing those in use at a convention would be priceless.

199 Thanos  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:49:55pm

You know what? It's the Fourth of July, I'm going to have fun and celebrate, I'll come back after you all are through uselessly rehashing last election for the umptee-eth time

200 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:50:24pm

re: #187 Naso Tang

How about a poll on those who think she owes everyone a clear answer?

It's not clear because people don't believe her. And it was rambling. She could have used a teleprompter. And fewer ducks squawking in the background.

201 ladycatnip  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:50:30pm

#156 & 168 JarHeadLifer

If Palin hurt the ticket so much why didn't Obama win by a landslide?

202 pingjockey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:51:03pm

Later on folks!

203 KingKenrod  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:51:22pm

re: #167 Killgore Trout

If this is a bid for the presidency it's strange and unprecedented. It will almost certainly not work. I'm still thinking she's bracing for a personal/legal scandal to break. It's the only way this move makes sense. There's also the possibility that there's a serious illness in the family or something like that.
If she was being honest about her reasons for leaving then her political career is over with. What if she gets elected into a public office again? It might be difficult. She might get criticized. Would she quit the presidency because it's too hard?
Either way, I think she's probably sunk for good. She could get speaking gigs for right wing crowds or a TV show but her political career is over with.

You want it to be a scandal because you love seeing conservatives go down in flames.

How does quitting as governor "brace" her for a scandal?

204 Idle Drifter  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:51:29pm

re: #187 Naso Tang

How about a poll on those who think she owes everyone a clear answer?

She doesn't owe me anything, what she does with her life is her choice. We'll find out the details about this in the coming news cycle head after all the speculation done and out of the way.

205 sngnsgt  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:51:53pm

re: #199 Thanos

While Dems celebrate the invasion of the west Indies!

206 ladycatnip  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:52:20pm

Time to get ready for company. Have a great 4th everyone.

207 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:52:58pm

re: #200 HelloDare

It's not clear because people don't believe her. And it was rambling. She could have used a teleprompter. And fewer ducks squawking in the background.

She did use a teleprompter. In some of the video footage, you can see a guy kneeling in front of her with a towel/blanket draped around him. He's holding a hand-held teleprompter. That's what makes her performance even more puzzling. That was a prepared text she was reading.

208 Sambo  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:53:31pm

re: #204 Idle Drifter

The same thought crossed my mind last night. Where in the hell do people get off thinking everyone always owes them something?

209 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:53:34pm

Funny thing. Sarah Palin was running for vice-presidency.This is pretty much a figurehead position, with no real power. Yet people act as if she was trying for the presidency itself. Tell me one vice-president candidate who has garnered this much attention and vitriol. ....They are afraid of her. They don't think she is stupid. They don't think she is dishonest. They don't want her in the competition. She is a V-8 engine and they are running straight sixes. These "ethics" complaints are solely to paint her as unethical, and to raise to operating expenses of the office of Governor to make her look immoral or inefficient...and now she's bailed out of the game.

In the movies, this is the part where the bad guys have the hero holed up in a building, and he disappears. No one has read the script, so they don't know if the hero is going to escape to a desert island and live in paradise, or circle around and blow the crap out of them.

But NPR is being awfully polite about this. That is the wisest position; If the snake has been decapitated, they look charitable, if the snake still has fangs, they have not placed themselves in danger.
Meanwhile, the monkeys are shrieking, and jumping up and down.

But then, they always did.

210 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:54:04pm

re: #204 Idle Drifter

She doesn't owe me anything, what she does with her life is her choice. We'll find out the details about this in the coming news cycle head after all the speculation done and out of the way.

I disagree. Politicians who have a career based on their public image do owe the public certain things. You don't owe me anything, but she had my vote once. She owes me something, not to mention the people of Alaska.

211 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:54:16pm

re: #201 ladycatnip


Lyndon Johnson's 61.1% to Barry Goldwater's 38.5% in the 1964 presidential election
Franklin D. Roosevelt's 60.8% to Alf Landon's 36.5% in the 1936 presidential election
Richard Nixon's 60.7% to George McGovern's 37.5% in the 1972 presidential election
Warren Harding's 60.3% to James M. Cox's 34.1% in the 1920 presidential election
Ronald Reagan's 58.8% to Walter Mondale's 40.6% in the 1984 presidential election
Theodore Roosevelt's 56.4% to Alton B. Parker's 37.6% in the 1904 presidential election

Anybody missing from that list?

212 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:55:54pm

re: #203 KingKenrod

How does quitting as governor "brace" her for a scandal?


Because the transition to a new governor is already in place and she doesn't have to be removed from office. It saves the chaos of having to scramble and avoids the embarrassment of being impeached.

213 capitalist piglet  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:56:42pm

re: #196 Salamantis

McCain sealed his doom when he announced that the US economy was fundamentally sound right before the big crash.

I voted for him, but he lost me in spirit when he told that man in Wisconsin that he had nothing to fear from an Obama presidency. How could he possibly believe that?

"Fight with me", my ass.

214 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:56:47pm

re: #207 JarHeadLifer

Didn't know that. Surprising. Sounded like she went off script.

215 harpsicon  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:57:38pm

re: #123 Walter L. Newton

Then let's get with the program. Why are we being so nice? Hell, 100 years ago, candidates where publicly calling each other liars and cheats. All kind of charges and slanders were made in the yellow newspapers, there was almost nothing that was hands off.

So, hit back, play their game. It's the left who have blown so much politically correct smoke in our face (while they practice none of it) that we have become convinced that we just all need to get along.

Civil discourse my ass.

What happened to a fiery speech, a rousing rhetoric, a little populist condescending campaign ads? We've wimped out, while the left has been cutting their teeth on snark.

If you believe this, then why are you so down on Palin?

She's definitely not quitting! I was clear to me from watching her press conference that she wants to get out there and do some good for America. To speak against all the nonsense going on in Washington, to start with. To remind people how our values have been a raging success compared to all others since the founding of the Republic. How copying the failures of modern Europe is not the path. Etc.

If she wishes, she'll be giving a speech every night, all over America. And probably making more money than is possible in public service. And having way more effect for good than she can possibly have as governor of Alaska, even without the trash that's bankrupting her and keeping her from doing her job.

Lt. Gov. Parnell can do what she's doing, and clearly she trusts him to continue the good work. Why not pass the ball off, when the full court press is on you and you can be more useful and effective in another position on the court.

I'm sure she means to go out there and do good, politically, as most people here understand the term. Whether that means running for anything is something I'm guessing she doesn't even know at this point.

But somebody has to stand up and loudly proclaim what's wrong with the current path, and what a present danger it is for us. NOBODY ELSE IS DOING THIS. For whatever reason - it's not polite, it's not PC, it won't do their careers any good, whatever...

This is imho a brilliant move, as she is free to talk and fight for what's right way more effectively than she can now. Without all the BS. I think that's her goal, her overall plan, and people who can only think in terms of "career" as holding a job can never possibly get what it means to go for what's right regardless of the immediate consequences.

Will she succeed? You can be sure the MSM and the democrats will be after her more than ever, but she won't be winning any more "sitting duck" awards! She'll be a moving target, and they will be the fixed targets that she can shoot at from whatever angle is best.

Brilliant move, in the greater scheme of things.

It's about time somebody gave Obama and company a hard time! That's what we're really concerned about here, isn't it - how people are just rolling ove in the face of the most determined assault on our liberties that the nation has ever seen?

216 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:57:44pm

re: #168 JarHeadLifer

You'll forgive me if I'm not compelled by your anecdotal evidence. I'll take quantitative and qualitative analysis every time. If you can provide any data that supports your position other than "what your friends think", I'd be happy to review it.

Of the exit polls I've seen, most indicate that at least 60% of the people who voted on election day didn't feel Palin was competent to be either Vice-President or President. That's not helping the ticket, that's hurting hit. By comparison, those same polls indicated that 70% of the people (or more) felt Biden was competent.

And that speaks worlds
who molds peoples opinions?
and why?

217 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:57:47pm

re: #207 JarHeadLifer

She did use a teleprompter. In some of the video footage, you can see a guy kneeling in front of her with a towel/blanket draped around him. He's holding a hand-held teleprompter. That's what makes her performance even more puzzling. That was a prepared text she was reading.

Good grief! I see the "talking points" are out in full force.

Gotta bash Palin on the teleprompter because the right bashes Obama! //

218 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:57:54pm

re: #201 ladycatnip

#156 & 168 JarHeadLifer

If Palin hurt the ticket so much why didn't Obama win by a landslide?

Have you not seen the electoral vote totals? Obama beat him by 192 electoral votes with a 7% popular vote margin. Given the razor-thin margins of the previous two elections, that's a landslide.

219 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:58:18pm

re: #203 KingKenrod

...and I had to downding you for opening with a strawman. I'm so used to it that I really don't even notice anymore.

220 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:58:52pm

re: #211 The Shadow Do

Come 2010, this trend needs a break
[Link: www.infoplease.com...]

221 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:59:03pm

re: #156 JarHeadLifer

Obama won because the economy turned. McCain, despite all his faults, was ahead by a point or even according to the polls.

And Iraq was off the table. The country trusted Republicans more on the war then Democrats.

Ironically, if Obama's bill mandating all troops out of Iraq by March 31. 2008 had passed disaster would have followed and Obama would not have been elected President.

222 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:59:16pm

re: #212 Killgore Trout

Because the transition to a new governor is already in place and she doesn't have to be removed from office. It saves the chaos of having to scramble and avoids the embarrassment of being impeached.

If there were any 'there' there would not the many, many people sifting her trash and bringing lawsuits have turned it up by now?

You may be right, but that actually seems the least logical explanation at this point to me.

223 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:59:20pm
On “The Early Show Saturday Edition,” Rollins, who headed up former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee’s 2008 White House run, told co-anchor Erica Hill that Palin’s Friday news conference “raised a lot more questions than she answered. Usually, at a press conference, you answer questions. I think the bottom line is you saw a shooting star come crashing to Earth.

So, Huckleberry's hound dog wants to bark at Palin? Does he think she's too soft on evil-u-tion or what?

It's obvious that Huckabee wants to challenge for leadership of the socon wing of the GOP. I hear his radio show once in a while, he's pretty good. He might actually have a shot at the nomination. Unfortunately for us, the final result could only be a second term for the Zero and a defacto one-party state for the foreseeable future.

224 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:00:00pm

re: #218 JarHeadLifer

Have you not seen the electoral vote totals? Obama beat him by 192 electoral votes with a 7% popular vote margin. Given the razor-thin margins of the previous two elections, that's a landslide.

Again with the talking points!

Seriously, I see this same crap all over the leftist boards.

225 Syrah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:00:14pm

re: #209 swamprat

Funny thing. Sarah Palin was running for vice-presidency.This is pretty much a figurehead position, with no real power. Yet people act as if she was trying for the presidency itself. Tell me one vice-president candidate who has garnered this much attention and vitriol. ....They are afraid of her. They don't think she is stupid. They don't think she is dishonest. They don't want her in the competition. She is a V-8 engine and they are running straight sixes. These "ethics" complaints are solely to paint her as unethical, and to raise to operating expenses of the office of Governor to make her look immoral or inefficient...and now she's bailed out of the game.

In the movies, this is the part where the bad guys have the hero holed up in a building, and he disappears. No one has read the script, so they don't know if the hero is going to escape to a desert island and live in paradise, or circle around and blow the crap out of them.

But NPR is being awfully polite about this. That is the wisest position; If the snake has been decapitated, they look charitable, if the snake still has fangs, they have not placed themselves in danger.
Meanwhile, the monkeys are shrieking, and jumping up and down.

But then, they always did.

The town has been painted red and renamed Hell.

226 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:00:23pm

re: #219 Killgore Trout

...and I had to downding you for opening with a strawman. I'm so used to it that I really don't even notice anymore.

If that was a strawman, it needed another bail.

227 Opilio  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:00:50pm

re: #211 The Shadow Do

Lyndon Johnson's 61.1% to Barry Goldwater's 38.5% in the 1964 presidential election
Franklin D. Roosevelt's 60.8% to Alf Landon's 36.5% in the 1936 presidential election
Richard Nixon's 60.7% to George McGovern's 37.5% in the 1972 presidential election
Warren Harding's 60.3% to James M. Cox's 34.1% in the 1920 presidential election
Ronald Reagan's 58.8% to Walter Mondale's 40.6% in the 1984 presidential election
Theodore Roosevelt's 56.4% to Alton B. Parker's 37.6% in the 1904 presidential election

Anybody missing from that list?

Thomas Jefferson 72.8% to Charles Pinckney 27.2% in the 1804 presidential election

228 BigPapa  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:01:06pm

re: #123 Walter L. Newton

So, hit back, play their game. It's the left who have blown so much politically correct smoke in our face (while they practice none of it) that we have become convinced that we just all need to get along.

Civil discourse my ass.

What happened to a fiery speech, a rousing rhetoric, a little populist condescending campaign ads? We've wimped out, while the left has been cutting their teeth on snark.

It's almost as if the GOP treats the D's the same way the D's treat world threats and terrorism: I wish the D's dealt with despots and tyrants the same way they treated the GOP in campaigning. Interesting irony.

229 KingKenrod  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:01:33pm

I think the negative impact of her quitting is being overstated. Most of her supporters don't care about her being governor of Alaska, they care about her future impact. Depending on what Palin does now, her supporters will probably be more pleased if she takes a stronger national role.

Politicians quit all the time when offered a "better" (more powerful) job, and people don't complain about them abandoning their states for more personal ambitions. Kathleen Sebilius quit being Governor of Kansas to be HHS Secretary. John Huntsman will quit being Governor of Utah to become Ambassador to China. Hillary Clinton quit being a Senator to become Secretary of State.

So I think criticism of Palin should be tempered until we see what she does after resigning.

230 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:01:57pm

re: #226 DEZes

If that was a strawman, it needed another bale.

231 EmmmieG  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:02:55pm

Just a drive by (a house repair that involved replacing innumerable screws has left my arms not wanting to type much).

This is such an awesome country. I inherited my citizenship, I did nothing to earn it, and so I gratefully take this moment to thank those ancestors of mine who fought for that freedom, who left their homes in less-free countries and moved onto the frontier, and sacrificed. Because of them, I am free.

232 SpartanWoman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:02:55pm

re: #210 Naso Tang

She owes the Alaskans an effective governor that doesn't have to spend most of the time fighting groundless smears ans she owes her family better than the personal bankruptcy that they would have suffered if she continued that same fight.

I suppose some would have admired her if she racked up 10million in debt and had nothing but the office at the end of the day, but this admiration she can do without. She doesn't have Romney, McCain's or Kerry's money or a rich wife.

233 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:03:39pm

The Economic Game-Changer

McCain's lead came to an abrupt halt with the onset of the Wall Street crisis in mid-September. By Sept. 17, the Republican nominee again trailed Obama by a few percentage points, and while the race briefly closed to a tie later in the month, McCain never regained the lead.

McCain attempted a bold move by suspending his campaign in late September to return to Washington to focus on legislation to address the financial crisis, but he resumed his campaign in time to debate Obama on Sept. 26 even though Congress had not formulated a legislative plan.

The debates were perhaps McCain's best opportunity to reverse Obama's growing momentum, but he was unable to do so. USA Today/Gallup polls found that Americans rated Obama the winner of all three debates, and these may have helped him solidify his gains. October proved to be Obama's best month of the campaign, as he averaged a nine-point lead among registered voters over McCain in Gallup Poll Daily tracking.

234 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:03:48pm

re: #218 JarHeadLifer

Have you not seen the electoral vote totals? Obama beat him by 192 electoral votes with a 7% popular vote margin. Given the razor-thin margins of the previous two elections, that's a landslide.

Funny, I remember Hillary wanting to get rid of the Electoral College in '04, IIRC. Not that it would have mattered in this election. And a landslide is taking, say, 49 states?

235 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:03:52pm

re: #229 KingKenrod

I think the negative impact of her quitting is being overstated. Most of her supporters don't care about her being governor of Alaska, they care about her future impact. Depending on what Palin does now, her supporters will probably be more pleased if she takes a stronger national role.

Politicians quit all the time when offered a "better" (more powerful) job, and people don't complain about them abandoning their states for more personal ambitions. Kathleen Sebilius quit being Governor of Kansas to be HHS Secretary. John Huntsman will quit being Governor of Utah to become Ambassador to China. Hillary Clinton quit being a Senator to become Secretary of State.

So I think criticism of Palin should be tempered until we see what she does after resigning.

Amen and thank you!

236 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:04:43pm

re: #220 Roger

Come 2010, this trend needs a break
[Link: www.infoplease.com...]

How so, looks like turnout in off years is pretty steady at about 37%?

237 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:05:18pm

re: #209 swamprat

You're right about the figurehead thing, but oh no, all we ever heard was "heartbeat away from the presidency." The ageism leveled at McCain was bad enough (though he got a clear bill of health and has great genes), but the implication that Palin--though she was an elected and functioning governor--was a total airhead, was the lowest. If she was in no way prepared for the presidency, though she was running for VP, then certainly top of the ticket Obama was not prepared. Now who do we have one heartbeat away from this presidency? Joe Biden.

Now for me? Time to start revving up for the activities of the day. A Very Happy Day of Independence for all lizards!

238 SpartanWoman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:05:39pm

I will be surprised if some new "scandal" emerges. The press would have found it by now and smeared it all over the front pages. They still are capable of thorough investigation when it comes to her, in fact they'll even run with lies about book burning if they have to.

239 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:05:57pm

re: #227 Opilio

Thomas Jefferson 72.8% to Charles Pinckney 27.2% in the 1804 presidential election

Yes! That's the one!

240 EmmmieG  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:06:04pm

I am free to say...

I think our president is wrong. Very, very wrong.

(I was going to say that he is a chucklehead, but I was afraid this would be misinterpreted as a slam against a certain Chief Lizard, which it would not have been.)

241 EmmmieG  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:06:39pm

re: #239 The Shadow Do

Yes! That's the one!

Would you have wanted to run against him? He was betting looking, smarter, better spoken, and beloved.

242 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:06:47pm

Heeeeeres Sarah!

(Letterman chokes on his coffee)

243 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:09:16pm

re: #87 The Shadow Do

Yup, she quit a lame duck post. So what? Why do you even care?

Lame duck? She's barely halfway through her first term; in Alaska, the governor can serve two consecutive terms; I'm fairly certain they can serve an unlimited number of non-consecutive terms. But I don't see how she's a "lame duck" by any definition.

I know Palin herself was tossing this term around during her resignation speech yesterday, but it still doesn't make any sense.

244 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:10:22pm

re: #21 Naso Tang

Yet another media frenzy right on the heels of Jackson. If I was an Alaskan I would tell her to drop dead, but as I'm not I will just say, go away.

Naso, long time no see. Get this: Odds are that if you were an Alaskan, you would back her to the hilt, understand her decision, and wish her well in whatever comes. An overwhelming majority of Alaskans do, which is something no governor has been able to say for decades.
Senator McCain placed her in national politics, yes, but she won everything state and below through hard work and smarts.

245 EmmmieG  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:10:29pm

re: #243 SixDegrees

Lame duck? She's barely halfway through her first term; in Alaska, the governor can serve two consecutive terms; I'm fairly certain they can serve an unlimited number of non-consecutive terms. But I don't see how she's a "lame duck" by any definition.

I know Palin herself was tossing this term around during her resignation speech yesterday, but it still doesn't make any sense.

She was saying that if she had announced no re-election, then stayed, she would have been a lame duck. She apparently felt Parnell would have more effectiveness with the possibility of another term in front of him.

246 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:10:51pm

re: #243 SixDegrees

Lame duck? She's barely halfway through her first term; in Alaska, the governor can serve two consecutive terms; I'm fairly certain they can serve an unlimited number of non-consecutive terms. But I don't see how she's a "lame duck" by any definition.

I know Palin herself was tossing this term around during her resignation speech yesterday, but it still doesn't make any sense.

I think it came from spending her time fighting lawsuits in stead of commanding office.

247 Cielolady  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:11:07pm

re: #215 harpsicon

Thank you. Brilliantly stated.

248 Idle Drifter  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:11:18pm

re: #210 Naso Tang

I disagree. Politicians who have a career based on their public image do owe the public certain things. You don't owe me anything, but she had my vote once. She owes me something, not to mention the people of Alaska.

Maybe this is a parting gift to the media to speculate over until the next political bungle or celebrity death to occupy their attention. She had my vote when I voted for McCain and that election is done. You'll get your answer to why she's stepping down will eventually in the coming weeks regardless of feelings. Lt.Gov. Sean R. Parnell seems a capable man and is going to run for Alaskas Govenor's seat in 2010. this may prove to be a boon for him. So all we can do is wait.

249 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:12:30pm

re: #232 SpartanWoman

She owes the Alaskans an effective governor that doesn't have to spend most of the time fighting groundless smears ans she owes her family better than the personal bankruptcy that they would have suffered if she continued that same fight.

I suppose some would have admired her if she racked up 10million in debt and had nothing but the office at the end of the day, but this admiration she can do without. She doesn't have Romney, McCain's or Kerry's money or a rich wife.

Are you speaking for her, or just bending over backwards?

You know what they say about assuming. I just want to hear it from the horse's mouth.

250 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:13:41pm

re: #213 capitalist piglet

I voted for him, but he lost me in spirit when he told that man in Wisconsin that he had nothing to fear from an Obama presidency. How could he possibly believe that?

"Fight with me", my ass.


I held my nose when I voted for him. Sarah was the reason I hung in there with the ticket.

251 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:13:59pm

re: #243 SixDegrees

Lame duck? She's barely halfway through her first term; in Alaska, the governor can serve two consecutive terms; I'm fairly certain they can serve an unlimited number of non-consecutive terms. But I don't see how she's a "lame duck" by any definition.

I know Palin herself was tossing this term around during her resignation speech yesterday, but it still doesn't make any sense.

Not in election mechanics, but the effect would be the same. The point she made was that if she could not govern effectively due to factors from outside the state (to put it politely), then she would be a lame duck no matter how long until the next election, and the state deserves better than that.

252 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:15:42pm

re: #244 haakondahl

Naso, long time no see. Get this: Odds are that if you were an Alaskan, you would back her to the hilt, understand her decision, and wish her well in whatever comes. An overwhelming majority of Alaskans do, which is something no governor has been able to say for decades.
Senator McCain placed her in national politics, yes, but she won everything state and below through hard work and smarts.

Howdy. I've been around, just a dearth of evolution threads lately....

I'm glad that Alaskans are psychic and know what she hasn't said. I wish they would show how they know that.

253 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:16:22pm

re: #243 SixDegrees

Lame duck? She's barely halfway through her first term; in Alaska, the governor can serve two consecutive terms; I'm fairly certain they can serve an unlimited number of non-consecutive terms. But I don't see how she's a "lame duck" by any definition.

I know Palin herself was tossing this term around during her resignation speech yesterday, but it still doesn't make any sense.

She had previously declared she would not run for another term, ergo lameduck

254 KingKenrod  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:17:03pm

re: #219 Killgore Trout

...and I had to downding you for opening with a strawman. I'm so used to it that I really don't even notice anymore.

That's OK, I'm not keeping score. I am, however, right.

255 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:17:36pm

re: #249 Naso Tang

Are you speaking for her, or just bending over backwards?

You know what they say about assuming. I just want to hear it from the horse's mouth.


Rrrrwnow!

Showing our claws, are we?
meow

256 Ojoe  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:18:00pm

In my estimation "political strategists" are among the most clueless of human beings.

If Ed Rollins, or his democratic counterparts, or the Democratic, or the Republican politicians were competent & really saw things as they are, then would the country be in the mess it is now in?

Does not "government" mean keeping things on an even keel?

Aren't all those politicians and strategists right now guilty of epic failure?

If Ed Rollins sees Palin as having made a mistake, I think this is a really good indication that she is doing the right thing.

I could not more despise the current political creatures who gerrymander their safe districts and run the country into the ground ass their little private club.

Down with them all & Palin does well to distance herself from the lot.

I have spoken.

257 Pullus Iulius  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:18:05pm

The Two Crows

As I was walking all alone,
I heard two ravens making a moan;
One said to the other,
"Where shall we go and dine today?"

"In behind that old turf wall,
I sense there lies a newly slain knight;
And nobody knows that he lies there,
But his hawk, his hound and his lady fair."

"His hound is to the hunting gone,
His hawk to fetch the wild-fowl home,
His lady's has taken another mate,
So we may make our dinner sweet."

"You will sit on his white neck-bone,
And I'll peck out his pretty blue eyes;
With one lock of his golden hair
We'll thatch our nest when it grows bare."

"Many a one for him is moaning,
But nobody will know where he is gone;
Over his white bones, when they are bare,
The wind will blow for evermore."

Lots of feasting being done by lots of different crows. But sometimes things turn out badly for those crows.

258 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:18:13pm

re: #143 pingjockey

I agree 100 percent. McCain and the let's be civil shit can go to hell. The one is a goddamn socialist, his policies are going to bankrupt this country, but lets be nice. BULLSHIT. Ted Kennedy is an alcoholic murderer, Robt. Byrd is a goddamn Kluxer, Pelosi, Reid ,et al are fucking crooks, Murtha is a traitor, Jon Halp Uz Kary is a fucking traitor, and my side wants to fight nice. Fuck that shit.

Don't mince words, Ping. I feel that you're trying to tell us something, but I'm just not sure...

259 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:19:10pm

re: #248 Idle Drifter

..........................So all we can do is wait.


and post opinions.

260 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:19:23pm

re: #243 SixDegrees

Lame duck? She's barely halfway through her first term; in Alaska, the governor can serve two consecutive terms; I'm fairly certain they can serve an unlimited number of non-consecutive terms. But I don't see how she's a "lame duck" by any definition.

I know Palin herself was tossing this term around during her resignation speech yesterday, but it still doesn't make any sense.

I really have to go after I post this, but I want to answer you. I don't have her speech in front of me, but I remember her meaning as, "Once I made the decision to resign, I did not want to burden Alaska with a lame duck who flies around accepting speaking engagements on AK's time and dime." These are not her words, but I got that meaning. Anyone have the words where she explains lame duck? So to me it makes complete and total sense. She is not going to continue letting AK pay for lawsuits about wearing a certain logo on sportswear (for example), and continue to have her staff's time devoted to the defense of all this crap instead of the full-time and legitimate business of actually governing the state. The whole argument about letting down the people of her state is polar opposite of the true situation.

261 poteen  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:20:10pm

It is for the reasons she stated OR;

1. She is positioning for higher office as speculated
2. She is simply burned out.
3. There is a scandal brewing that no one knows yet
4. Todd's been writing the names of media members on the sides of his broadheads./

Time will tell.

262 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:21:01pm

re: #218 JarHeadLifer

Have you not seen the electoral vote totals? Obama beat him by 192 electoral votes with a 7% popular vote margin. Given the razor-thin margins of the previous two elections, that's a landslide.

Not so much. See the post upthread for a list of real popular vote landslides; 20%+ margins aren't that uncommon. 7% is pretty small.

263 Ming  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:21:33pm

I suspect there's a simple reason for Palin's resignation. She took 5 years, and 6 colleges, to get an undergraduate degree -- finally! -- in sports journalism. She is filled with anger, makes enemies easily, and is thoroughly accustomed to moving on as the tensions mount. It would be more surprising if she were able to finish a four-year governorship.

264 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:21:34pm

re: #257 Pullus Iulius

Lots of feasting being done by lots of different crows. But sometimes things turn out badly for those crows.

Blam! now i have to buy another tv

265 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:22:22pm

What people are missing is an understanding of the family meetings the Palin's had before she ever ran for office. I get the sense they turned to their thoughts from that time period and those thoughts weren't ever about "quitting" or career politics.

266 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:22:50pm

re: #260 Silvergirl

PIMF

I meant to write that once she had made the decision to not seek reelection. . .

I wrote resign in the post.

267 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:22:55pm

Let's remember that when the press was literally combing through Palin's trash, it was Stanley Kurtz who wrestled Annenberg Challenge documents from the University of Chicago that proved Obama was lying about his relationship with Ayers. It wasn't a local Chicago newspaper or TV station -- not the NYT -- they were all reporting astroturf stories about Palin.

Remember the Biden-Palin debate? Joe was just making stuff up. Or he was delusional, or both. The press made nothing of it.

The media won the election for Obama.

I'm amazed at how many people think Palin said, "You can see Russia from my house." I heard that twice in the last week by radio hosts. You got to know people called and complained. No retractions.

Guess they must think it's Fake But Accurate™

268 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:22:57pm

re: #263 Ming

Really?

269 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:23:47pm

re: #245 EmmmieG

re: #246 DEZes

Neither explanation fits the definition of the term, common or otherwise. It was poorly used by Palin, and is being further misused by others after the fact.

270 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:24:08pm

re: #263 Ming

I suspect there's a simple reason for Palin's resignation. She took 5 years, and 6 colleges, to get an undergraduate degree -- finally! -- in sports journalism. She is filled with anger, makes enemies easily, and is thoroughly accustomed to moving on as the tensions mount. It would be more surprising if she were able to finish a four-year governorship.

I presume you are at a University now?

271 capitalist piglet[deleted]  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:24:34pm
272 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:24:50pm

re: #263 Ming

It would be more surprising if she were able to finish a four-year governorship.


I'm not a Palin fan and even I'm disappointed that she won't even finish her term. It does not speak well for her ability accomplish things and see them through.

273 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:25:25pm

re: #263 Ming
Please elaborate, and why do you suppose these facts have not been driven into the minds of every voter by a fair and unbiased press?

274 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:25:27pm

DEZes, I can accept, even respect, a downding if it is a genuine disagreement of opinion, but what the F* do you have against a quip about about posting opinions?

275 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:25:27pm

It's odd, given her professional training, that Palin was so unprepared for the venomous media onslaught that followed her nomination.

I think the GOP leadership still does not understand the real nature of their relationship with the media themselves and with the media culture in general. They seem to expect the media to be neutral observers of the process, then whine about "bias" when this ideal is not achieved. What they fail to understand is that the media culture, the "MSM" or media-industrial complex as I have reason to call it, is not an observer of any kind, biased or otherwise. It is, collectively, an interested participant in the process, with its own values, objectives and agenda. Its relationship with the Republican Party is inherently adversarial. It is not more relevant that the media are biased toward the Democrats than it is that Ford is biased toward its advertising agencies.
They are not the propaganda arm of the left and the Democrats, as many allege. It is the other way around; the liberal-left as we know it today is the political arm of the media culture.

276 capitalist piglet  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:25:47pm

I'd better go. I'm dangerously close to The Line™, if I haven't already crossed it.

See you all later, hopefully. Happy (and safe) Fourth to you all.

277 rnf  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:27:19pm

Rollins has been around forever, and he's never seen a governor resign in mid-term? Has he seen Massachusetts (Romney, then Cellucci).

278 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:27:22pm

re: #276 capitalist piglet

I'd better go. I'm dangerously close to The Line™, if I haven't already crossed it.

See you all later, hopefully. Happy (and safe) Fourth to you all.

Watch out for falling stars (joke).

279 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:27:35pm

re: #275 shiplord kirel

Well said. Republicans should have no expectation of fair treatment from the press. Complaining about it makes them look weak.

280 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:27:38pm

re: #269 SixDegrees

re: #246 DEZes

Neither explanation fits the definition of the term, common or otherwise. It was poorly used by Palin, and is being further misused by others after the fact.

She was crippled, It may not fit the political definition, but its still true.

281 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:27:48pm

re: #263 Ming

I suspect there's a simple reason for Palin's resignation. She took 5 years, and 6 colleges, to get an undergraduate degree -- finally! -- in sports journalism. She is filled with anger, makes enemies easily, and is thoroughly accustomed to moving on as the tensions mount. It would be more surprising if she were able to finish a four-year governorship.


If she ever becomes your President are you going to cry?

282 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:28:10pm

re: #263 Ming

I suspect there's a simple reason for Palin's resignation. She took 5 years, and 6 colleges, to get an undergraduate degree -- finally! -- in sports journalism. She is filled with anger, makes enemies easily, and is thoroughly accustomed to moving on as the tensions mount. It would be more surprising if she were able to finish a four-year governorship.

Really got your finger on the pulse of this thing, dontcha' Ming.

283 Idle Drifter  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:28:15pm

re: #259 Naso Tang

and post opinions.

Why not? Everybody and their cat is speculating. There's no urgency for this answer as there is capable leadership in Alaska to replace her.

284 poteen  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:28:49pm

re: #263 Ming

I suspect there's a simple reason for Palin's resignation. She took 5 years, and 6 colleges, to get an undergraduate degree -- finally! -- in sports journalism. She is filled with anger, makes enemies easily, and is thoroughly accustomed to moving on as the tensions mount. It would be more surprising if she were able to finish a four-year governorship.

Could be applied to some of our better Presidents too.

Reagan Truman?
Educational disqualification, makes enemies?
Dumb comment IMO.

285 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:28:49pm

re: #274 Naso Tang

DEZes, I can accept, even respect, a downding if it is a genuine disagreement of opinion, but what the F* do you have against a quip about about posting opinions?

You have been condescending for to many posts.

286 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:30:31pm

re: #283 Idle Drifter

Why not? Everybody and their cat is speculating. There's no urgency for this answer as there is capable leadership in Alaska to replace her.

Why not indeed? In case you haven't noticed, that's what I've been doing too.

287 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:30:40pm

re: #279 Killgore Trout

Well said. Republicans should have no expectation of fair treatment from the press. Complaining about it makes them look weak.

Many thanks, Kilgore. This whole notion of an unbiased press is a relatively recent invention, and something of a marketing ploy at that. It originated in the late 19th century when the new-fangled wire services like AP and Reuters were required to feed the same stories to a number of outlets who might have widely varying agendas and editorial stances.

288 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:31:04pm

re: #285 DEZes

You have been condescending for to many posts.

Up yours, you delicate thing, you.

289 Idle Drifter  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:31:07pm

re: #286 Naso Tang

Why not indeed? In case you haven't noticed, that's what I've been doing too.

Well knock me over with a feather.

290 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:31:12pm

re: #272 Killgore Trout

I'm not a Palin fan and even I'm disappointed that she won't even finish her term. It does not speak well for her ability accomplish things and see them through.

Horsepoop. She has accomplished much and seen much through. Alaska is a real state, you know. People actually work there, even the government.

291 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:32:02pm

re: #288 Naso Tang

Real class.

292 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:32:39pm

re: #284 poteen

It is an extremely dumb comment.

Think Einstein.

293 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:32:50pm

re: #289 Idle Drifter

Well knock me over with a feather.

Sorry, forgot the sarc.

:)

294 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:33:11pm

re: #282 The Shadow Do

Really got your finger on the pulse of this thing, dontcha' Ming.

She's Merciless.

295 Idle Drifter  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:34:02pm

re: #293 Naso Tang

Sorry, forgot the sarc.

:)

None needed.

296 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:34:20pm

re: #292 Roger

It is an extremely dumb comment.

Think Einstein.


And Bill Gates.

297 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:34:47pm

re: #274 Naso Tang

DEZes, I can accept, even respect, a downding if it is a genuine disagreement of opinion, but what the F* do you have against a quip about about posting opinions?

Complaining. One demerit.

298 Syrah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:35:15pm

Interesting how when Sarah Palin is in the news, there is no other news.

Obama could bloviate on a televised marathon and Sarah could stub her toe.

The Media woulds report on Sarah cussing.

299 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:35:54pm

re: #292 Roger

It is an extremely dumb comment.

Think Einstein.

And Bill Clinton.

300 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:36:03pm

re: #291 DEZes

Real class.

I respect expressed opinions, not wimpy sensitivity hurts, real or imagined. You think this is some sort of therapy session for self esteem phobias?

Otherwise however you're OK.

301 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:36:12pm

re: #290 haakondahl

Horsepoop. She has accomplished much and seen much through. Alaska is a real state, you know. People actually work there, even the government.

That's right. Has anybody mentioned that she said 80% (or some such number) of her time is being spent defending herself from frivolous accusations? I think her saying that her resignation was best for the people of Alaska can be explained right there.

302 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:36:50pm

There are no good candiates waiting in the wings. None. The existing system does not tend to promote them.

303 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:36:54pm

re: #280 DEZes

She was crippled, It may not fit the political definition, but its still true.

I'm sorry, but I'm not buying the "crippled" argument either. All politicians are barraged with criticism from the moment they enter public life until the moment they leave it - and often long after they leave it. It goes with the territory. The harassment of Palin was certainly more vile - and more juvenile - than what many politicians receive, but not by a lot. And I don't see politicians resigning their posts from sea to shining sea. Instead, they find ways to govern under such adversity.

If Palin doesn't have a thick enough skin to deal with this sort of vitriol, I can certainly sympathize; I certainly don't, and if that's her reason for resigning I can completely understand it and support it. However, it also makes clear that she isn't suited to high political office.

Note that there are a lot of "ifs" in the above. To my mind, I still don't have a coherent explanation for her departure. There could still be a family catastrophe - or a political scandal - looming in the background waiting to be revealed that will make this move clearer once it becomes known. But if she can't take the name-calling - an explanation being circulated by some of her aides - she doesn't belong in politics.

304 poteen  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:37:14pm

re: #292 Roger

And she did somehow get to be a national political figure.
Nope, not much of a finisher./

305 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:37:17pm

re: #300 Naso Tang

I respect expressed opinions, not wimpy sensitivity hurts, real or imagined. You think this is some sort of therapy session for self esteem phobias?

Otherwise however you're OK.

My feelings are not hurt,

306 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:37:26pm

re: #300 Naso Tang

I respect expressed opinions, not wimpy sensitivity hurts, real or imagined. You think this is some sort of therapy session for self esteem phobias?

Otherwise however you're OK.

I'm OK.

307 Idle Drifter  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:38:31pm

Well it's been fun so I'm going outside to enjoy the the pool and the sun. Have a great 4th of July.

308 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:39:41pm

re: #299 haakondahl

And Bill Clinton.

IIRC, wasn't Bill a Rhodes Scholar?

309 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:40:04pm

re: #297 haakondahl

Complaining. One demerit.

Fair enough, in principle, when the intent is obvious. In this case it was as if you said it was raining where you are and I downdinged you because I was too shy to counter someting you said last wee.

Sheesh.

310 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:41:06pm

re: #303 SixDegrees

To my mind, I still don't have a coherent explanation for her departure. There could still be a family catastrophe - or a political scandal - looming in the background waiting to be revealed that will make this move clearer once it becomes known. But if she can't take the name-calling - an explanation being circulated by some of her aides - she doesn't belong in politics.

Actually, you do have a coherent explanation. It's the same one you'v ebeen pushing since before the presser was even over, and you don't care to listen to any other explanation. Yours is coherent like neutronium.

311 KingKenrod  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:41:19pm

Breaking news: Steve McNair found dead of a gunshot in a home in Nashville. There is a second victim as well.

312 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:41:28pm

re: #306 haakondahl

I'm OK.

Me too. Beer and pool time. Later.

313 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:41:41pm

re: #309 Naso Tang

Fair enough, in principle, when the intent is obvious. In this case it was as if you said it was raining where you are and I downdinged you because I was too shy to counter someting you said last wee.

Sheesh.

I last weeed an hour ago. But I am drinking beer.

314 Truck Monkey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:42:03pm

re: #300 Naso Tang

I respect expressed opinions, not wimpy sensitivity hurts, real or imagined. You think this is some sort of therapy session for self esteem phobias?

Otherwise however you're OK.

re: #306 haakondahl

I'm OK.

We're all ok damn it! GROUP HUG! Anyone score tickets to Michael Jacksons funeral yet?
; )

315 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:42:09pm

re: #308 Cannadian Club Akbar

IIRC, wasn't Bill a Rhodes Scholar?


Yes, but he couldn't even finish a blowjob.

316 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:42:40pm

re: #311 KingKenrod

Breaking news: Steve McNair found dead of a gunshot in a home in Nashville. There is a second victim as well.

Who is that?

317 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:42:48pm

re: #311 KingKenrod

Breaking news: Steve McNair found dead of a gunshot in a home in Nashville. There is a second victim as well.

No shit!

318 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:43:34pm

re: #302 Wm T Sherman

There are no good candiates waiting in the wings. None. The existing system does not tend to promote them.

I think Mitt is the only viable candidate who still has a spotlight. The problem isn't so much with the politicians but getting the base to accept and nominate good candidates. Many of the best candidates won't pass various purity tests for social conservatism. Also, as the Tea Parties demonstrate, many conservatives don't even know what economic responsibility looks like if they were to see it. It's going to take a while for the gop to recover.

319 Truck Monkey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:43:38pm

re: #315 haakondahl

Yes, but he couldn't even finish a blowjob.

Ummm..... then what was on the blue dress?

320 Naso Tang  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:43:38pm

re: #313 VegasRick

I last weeed an hour ago. But I am drinking beer.

I was hanging around waiting for that. I was going to say, it makes sense either way.

:0

321 KingKenrod  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:43:50pm

re: #316 haakondahl

Who is that?

Former NFL quarterback. Played for the Tennessee Titans.

322 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:43:54pm

re: #310 haakondahl

Actually, you do have a coherent explanation. It's the same one you'v ebeen pushing since before the presser was even over, and you don't care to listen to any other explanation. Yours is coherent like neutronium.

I suspect you're confusing me with someone else.

323 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:44:17pm

re: #314 Truck Monkey

We're all ok damn it! GROUP HUG! Anyone score tickets to Michael Jacksons funeral yet?
; )

No but with an Air France ticket, you could crash the wake.

324 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:44:29pm

re: #311 KingKenrod

Oh no!

325 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:44:49pm

An informal poll:
If you were a nefarious Soros/MSNBC/ACORN media operative (which thank Cthulhu you're not or you wouldn't be here) who would you want to see as the GOP presidential nominee in 2012?

1.) Mike Huckabee
2.) Sarah Palin
3.) Rudy Giuliani
4.) Mitt Romney
5.) Duncan Hunter
6.) Ron Paul!

326 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:45:11pm

re: #315 haakondahl

Yes, but he couldn't even finish a blowjob.

Wasn't he charged with Obstructing Monica's throat?

327 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:45:17pm

re: #319 Truck Monkey

Ummm..... then what was on the blue dress?


Limp Duck sauce.

328 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:45:20pm

Ted Kennedy
Admiral Byrd
Barney Frank

Apparently what it takes to end a republicans' career is completely different from what it takes for a democrat.

329 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:45:22pm

re: #325 shiplord kirel

Ron Paul!
/Always Ron Paul

330 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:45:37pm

Am off to make the fixin's for our 4th of July celebration of human FREEDOM from tyranny!
On tonight's menu:
Hamburgers made with ground round and chorizo sausage.
Toppings:

Cheese of choice including melted gorgonzola
Sauteed mushrooms
Red onion
Peppers or pickles
*
Corn on the cob lathered with butter

331 Truck Monkey  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:45:39pm

re: #323 haakondahl

No but with an Air France ticket, you could crash the wake.

And I didn't have to even read this twice to understand what you were saying. Weiiiiird. I was waiting to hear some good Air France Ocean crash jokes.

332 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:46:32pm

re: #328 swamprat

Ted Kennedy
Admiral Byrd
Barney Frank

Apparently what it takes to end a republicans' career is completely different from what it takes for a democrat.

Admiral Byrd?

333 spacejesus  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:47:31pm

if palin runs in 2012 it will be the worst political defeat for a party since the reagan sweep

334 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:47:33pm

re: #316 haakondahl

Who is that?

Steve McNair

Steve LaTreal McNair (February 14, 1973 - July 4, 2009), nicknamed Air McNair, was an American football quarterback in the National Football League. He was originally drafted by the Houston Oilers third overall in the 1995 NFL Draft. He played college football at Alcorn State.

McNair was selected to the Pro Bowl three times and was the Co-AP NFL MVP in 2003.

335 ihateronpaul  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:47:35pm

re: #6 pat

. The relentless attacks on Palin's person both by the GOP elite and Democrats, her children, and the derision of the liberals for a retarded child took a toll. Rollins has no such excuse.

If she can't handle personal attacks how is she going to handle err....IRAN?

336 Grand Poobah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:47:40pm

A "Republican strategist" What does that mean? Hell, can I be an armchair Republican strategist plz?

Republican strategists did a lot for McCain last election, at the end of the day he was blubbering about while Obama at least put on a smooth face for everyone to see.

I think these so called "Republican strategists" need to take a nice glass of STFU and think before they start making domesday predictions.

337 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:47:57pm

re: #319 Truck Monkey

Ummm..... then what was on the blue dress?

re: #326 Cannadian Club Akbar

Wasn't he charged with Obstructing Monica's throat?

I am shocked at the level of intercourse on these threads.

338 dmandman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:48:03pm

McNair link:


[Link: cbs11tv.com...]

339 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:49:04pm

re: #337 haakondahl

I am shocked at the level of intercourse on these threads.

Let's not blow our credibility with these crude references.

340 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:49:16pm

re: #328 swamprat

Ted Kennedy
Admiral Byrd
Barney Frank

Apparently what it takes to end a republicans' career is completely different from what it takes for a democrat.

Wrong Byrd.

341 rightymouse  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:49:25pm

Happy 4th of July to all!

342 Baelzar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:49:27pm

If the Republicans run Palin, Jindal or Huckabee against Obama, they will lose.

They need to drop the family values flag altogether. They don't understand that yet, but after 2-3 more major defeats, maybe...

343 HoosierHoops  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:50:17pm

re: #334 shiplord kirel

Oh Fuck no! McNair is dead? I can't believe this last week...
Damn it!

344 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:50:29pm

re: #302 Wm T Sherman

There are no good candiates waiting in the wings. None. The existing system does not tend to promote them.

I'm not sure the sytem has changed. Peoples values have though. I suspect it has always been about finding the upward path to national prominance/notoriety which is no mean feat - past or present.

The difference is that in the past a great military leader, for example, could be rise to the forefront, now you get Al Franken and Obama.

345 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:50:51pm

re: #335 ihateronpaul

If she can't handle personal attacks how is she going to handle err....IRAN?

Beat it, troll. Take your straw man with you.

346 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:51:15pm

re: #332 SixDegrees

Sorry, I meant the Senator klansman.

/was it over when the Germans bombed Peal Harbor!

347 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:51:37pm

re: #337 haakondahl

I am shocked at the level of intercourse on these threads.

sometimes we're just screwing around......

348 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:52:41pm

re: #345 haakondahl

Beat it, troll. Take your straw man with you.

Can I shove the strawman up it's ass? Please?

349 HelloDare  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:52:54pm

re: #263 Ming

I suspect there's a simple reason for Palin's resignation. She took 5 years, and 6 colleges, to get an undergraduate degree -- finally! -- in sports journalism. She is filled with anger, makes enemies easily, and is thoroughly accustomed to moving on as the tensions mount. It would be more surprising if she were able to finish a four-year governorship.


Ming the Merciless? You're him, right?

350 Baelzar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:52:55pm

re: #325 shiplord kirel

I'd have to go with Palin at this point. She is already damaged goods after losing, has blown her family values cred with her pregnant daughter, and has now just folded under pressure.

She'd be very easy to carve up.

351 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:53:18pm

re: #348 VegasRick

Can I shove the strawman up it's ass? Please?

/lights strawman on fire.....

go for it. %-)

352 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:53:19pm

You make one

little

mistake...

353 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:53:43pm

re: #275 shiplord kirel

It's odd, given her professional training, that Palin was so unprepared for the venomous media onslaught that followed her nomination.


I'm pretty sure she was prepared for the attacks on her. It was the attacks on her children, particularly the younger kids that was unprecedented.

354 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:53:57pm

re: #348 VegasRick

With Biceps like that, I should think so. Mind the horns.

355 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:54:41pm

re: #346 swamprat

Sorry, I meant the Senator klansman.

/was it over when the Germans bombed Peal Harbor!

That would be Klansman Robert Byrd. Which is what I thought.

Admiral Byrd was a national hero, and we could use a few more like him.

356 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:55:15pm

re: #351 redc1c4

/lights strawman on fire.....

go for it. %-)

Little gasoline. Well, it is July 4th.

357 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:55:41pm

re: #349 HelloDare

Ming the Merciless? You're him, right?

newbie troll breaking cover is more like it:

Registered since: Mar 22, 2009 at 2:29 pm
No. of comments posted: 24
No. of links posted: 0

read some of the recent comments..... %-)

358 gareth  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:55:57pm

From the comments on here it would seem Sarah Palin has put her family first and the State a close second. Alaskans aren't getting their elected representative if Mrs Palin is embattled in legal matter after legal matter.

This is similar to businesses that go wrong and the CEO resigns. It may not have been them personally responsible but they are the figurehead and removing themselves is the first step to everyone moving forward with their lives/careers/business.

Whatever Mrs Palin chooses to do next I wish her well. For a relatively brief period in time the world's media was discussing a politician who knew her responsibility to voters and to taxpayers, and had a well defined opinion that the State should have limits. Far too much of the current Western politicial elite and media wish for ever larger State and ever more legislation and regulation. Mrs Palin went against that grain in a straightforward fashion.

The media and the elite were frightened. A woman. A woman! One of many groups the elite seek to inculcate and enslave in the casual corruption of welfarism and positive discrimination, and Mrs Palin wanted neither.

359 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:56:14pm

re: #317 VegasRick

No shit!

whoa!....I gotta think about that a second

360 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:56:44pm

re: #353 Wendya

I'm pretty sure she was prepared for the attacks on her. It was the attacks on her children, particularly the younger kids that was unprecedented.

Ding. Ding. Ding. We have a winner!

361 The Shadow Do  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:57:09pm

"folded under pressure" my ass. what in this woman's history would lead one to believe that she 'just can't take it'.

Stupid.

362 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:57:14pm

re: #342 Baelzar

If the Republicans run Palin, Jindal or Huckabee against Obama, they will lose.

They need to drop the family values flag altogether. They don't understand that yet, but after 2-3 more major defeats, maybe...

Exactly. They should run on the get an abortion, your baby don't need no daddy, trust the goverment to take care of you, and why bother trying to better yourself through education and hard work. Family values. What a joke.
/

363 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:57:29pm

re: #336 Grand Poobah

A "Republican strategist" What does that mean? Hell, can I be an armchair Republican strategist plz?

Republican strategists did a lot for McCain last election, at the end of the day he was blubbering about while Obama at least put on a smooth face for everyone to see.

I think these so called "Republican strategists" need to take a several nice large glasses of STFU and think before they start making domesday predictions.

FTFY!

364 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:58:49pm

re: #325 shiplord kirel

An informal poll:
If you were a nefarious Soros/MSNBC/ACORN media operative (which thank Cthulhu you're not or you wouldn't be here) who would you want to see as the GOP presidential nominee in 2012?

1.) Mike Huckabee
2.) Sarah Palin
3.) Rudy Giuliani
4.) Mitt Romney
5.) Duncan Hunter
6.) Ron Paul!

Good question. Maybe Giuliani? It'd be easy to hammer him on his personal life. All you'd have to do is show that picture of him in drag once a news cycle, while repeating a few choice quotes from various speeches to alienate almost any voting demographic ever. Speaking as a former resident of NY, the man did a serious about-face when running on a national scale, and has several very conflicting images as a result. Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney for the most part avoided a similar problem.

IMO, this was stupid in the case of the media vis a vis Sarah, since exposure on the national stage of partisanship was enough to make her lose a number of points back home in Alaska, indicating a significant image gap.

Ron Paul is too easy, but also unrealisitic to win a primary.

Huckabee? I dunno. I'd like to think that the YEC thing would hamstring him, but I'm not entirely sure. If it was, I'd choose him, as he would be incapable of gaining enough states to win the presidency.

365 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 1:58:50pm

re: #275 shiplord kirel

It's odd, given her professional training, that Palin was so unprepared for the venomous media onslaught that followed her nomination.

Up till now, I did not know she was a former marine special forces fighter, with a professional wrestling backgound.
Because that's the only way that sentence makes any sense.

366 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:00:02pm

Fox News is saying murder-suicide...

367 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:00:49pm

re: #361 The Shadow Do

"folded under pressure" my ass. what in this woman's history would lead one to believe that she 'just can't take it'.

Stupid.

This is, perhaps, another reason why waiting for a more cogent explanation is advisable.

368 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:01:04pm

re: #365 swamprat

Up till now, I did not know she was a former marine special forces fighter, with a professional wrestling backgound.
Because that's the only way that sentence makes any sense.

Nah, waterboarding instructor.

369 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:01:55pm

re: #366 Roger

Fox News is saying murder-suicide...

Are they saying who was involved?

370 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:02:11pm

re: #367 SixDegrees

This is, perhaps, another reason why waiting for a more cogent explanation is advisable.

Agreed, the answers will come in time.
The beer today, even sooner.

371 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:02:13pm

re: #368 shiplord kirel

Nah, waterboarding instructor.

I'd let her do me.

372 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:02:25pm

re: #318 Killgore Trout

I think Mitt is the only viable candidate who still has a spotlight. The problem isn't so much with the politicians but getting the base to accept and nominate good candidates. Many of the best candidates won't pass various purity tests for social conservatism. Also, as the Tea Parties demonstrate, many conservatives don't even know what economic responsibility looks like if they were to see it. It's going to take a while for the gop to recover.

if that's the case and maybe it is then we are really doomed...but then how did our indifference happen so fast?...I believe the economy grew every quarter of GWBs reign except the last...ho wdo you explain that away?....how do you explain the growing budget in the face of unemplyment and inflation?...why did't BO get some tax cuts passed to stimulate the economy....how does massive increased debt stimulate the economy?...what happened to CA?

373 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:02:40pm

re: #369 SixDegrees

Are they saying who was involved?

the murderer and the victim.

374 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:04:13pm

re: #369 SixDegrees

Are they saying who was involved?

MSNBC thinks it's Bush.

375 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:04:28pm

re: #373 redc1c4

the murderer and the victim.

Damn. I never would have expected something like that.

376 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:04:33pm

re: #369 SixDegrees

They changed it to say what the other news is saying; that he was killed by gunshot

377 HoosierHoops  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:04:39pm

re: #366 Roger

Fox News is saying murder-suicide...

Oh God.. I don't believe this....This is a sad day in sports....

378 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:04:48pm

re: #366 Roger

Fox News is saying murder-suicide...

That's just horrible. He was one of the good guys. Steve McNair Foundation

379 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:04:51pm

re: #374 VegasRick

MSNBC thinks it's Bush.

I knew it......

380 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:04:59pm

re: #353 Wendya

I'm pretty sure she was prepared for the attacks on her. It was the attacks on her children, particularly the younger kids that was unprecedented.

You know, I'd like to get iceweasel or avanti's take on the treatment of POTUS-affiliated children in the media. Amy smoked dope IN THE WHITE HOUSE, which was duly noted and briefly scandalous. Chelsea was savaged by perhaps three people, and just once per. The Bush girls were roughed up on a fairly regular basis, but usually no cause for outrage--just anger. Sarah Palin's children have been cleaned and filleted in the media. President Obama might as well not have children for all the media says, which is good.

Just thinking out loud, but I can't think of anything like it.

381 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:05:14pm

re: #375 SixDegrees

Damn. I never would have expected something like that.

after making millions in the NFL he was probably in debt up to his ears

382 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:05:55pm

re: #374 VegasRick

MSNBC thinks it's Bush.

Somehting about Rove and a shotgun.
///

383 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:06:19pm

re: #377 HoosierHoops

Oh God.. I don't believe this....This is a sad day in sports....

yes it is...he was not a gangster type guy, or whatever

384 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:07:25pm

re: #375 SixDegrees

Damn. I never would have expected something like that.

glad i could help...... %-)

385 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:07:45pm

re: #371 VegasRick

I'd let her do me.


*Whack!*

[adjusts fake Giuliani boobs]

386 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:07:56pm

I seldom follow sports, but I do wish the friends and family strength at this time.

387 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:08:33pm

re: #380 haakondahl

You know, I'd like to get iceweasel or avanti's take on the treatment of POTUS-affiliated children in the media. Amy smoked dope IN THE WHITE HOUSE, which was duly noted and briefly scandalous. Chelsea was savaged by perhaps three people, and just once per. The Bush girls were roughed up on a fairly regular basis, but usually no cause for outrage--just anger. Sarah Palin's children have been cleaned and filleted in the media. President Obama might as well not have children for all the media says, which is good.

Just thinking out loud, but I can't think of anything like it.

fill in the blank derangement syndrome...the can be no other explanation...avanti would not answer that very question earlier....I think some liberals are ashamed but won't admit it

388 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:08:36pm

re: #374 VegasRick

MSNBC thinks it's Bush.

Rove!

//

389 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:08:49pm

re: #385 haakondahl

*Whack!*

[adjusts fake Giuliani boobs]

LOL!

390 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:09:14pm

I just spent a little time with Fox news. Not only are they not doing wall to wall live Tea Party coverage, they aren't mentioning the Tea Parties at all., Just generic holiday coverage.

391 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:09:29pm

re: #385 haakondahl

*Whack!*

[adjusts fake Giuliani boobs]

Mind bleach, stat.

392 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:09:44pm

re: #373 redc1c4

the murderer and the victim.

But who was which?

"Well, first, he shot himself. Then he wiped the prints, placed the revolver in the victim's hand, and wrestled the gun upward."

393 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:09:55pm

for liberals it's party/power over principle, every time

394 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:09:56pm

re: #387 albusteve

fill in the blank derangement syndrome...the can be no other explanation...avanti would not answer that very question earlier....I think some liberals are ashamed but won't admit it

lie-berals have shame? since when?

(other than being ashamed of America, that is.)

395 dapperdave  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:09:57pm

"Shooting star" I would have to disagree, to me this story from Fox seems to make the most sense. [Link: www.foxnews.com...]

I see a lot of speeches in the future and a huge conservative movement as a result.

396 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:10:15pm

re: #390 Killgore Trout

I just spent a little time with Fox news. Not only are they not doing wall to wall live Tea Party coverage, they aren't mentioning the Tea Parties at all., Just generic holiday coverage.

The bastards.

397 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:10:51pm

re: #390 Killgore Trout

I just spent a little time with Fox news. Not only are they not doing wall to wall live Tea Party coverage, they aren't mentioning the Tea Parties at all., Just generic holiday coverage.

as much as you hate the whole "tea party" thing, you should be rejoicing.

398 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:11:22pm

re: #397 redc1c4

as much as you hate the whole "tea party" thing, you should be rejoicing.

He is.

399 BigPapa  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:11:49pm

Later lizards. I have to go prep for work blowing up stuff. Be back around Midnight Hawaii time.

Behave!

400 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:11:55pm

re: #397 redc1c4

as much as you hate the whole "tea party" thing, you should be rejoicing.

heh...heh...no comment

401 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:12:02pm

re: #393 albusteve

for liberals it's party/power over principle, every time

especially since they already have a party, they lust after power, but have no principles as you and i would know the concept.....

402 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:13:38pm

re: #401 redc1c4

especially since they already have a party, they lust after power, but have no principles as you and i would know the concept.....

the only way to explain the outrage against Palin....if they don't fear her then it must cruel lust...even more sick

403 dmandman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:13:46pm

re: #380 haakondahl

I still remember the Amy Carter "I wanna chainsaw for Christmas" funs and games within the National media....but they were they played pretty much as an Arthur Linkletter "Kid's say the darndest things" moment. The level of depravity against the Palin kids reached horrendous levels. Certainly there were attacks against the various Presidential candidates in our history that contained extreme sexual accusations, but the line never crossed over to children. The Hufpo type pieces up to the 1980's would have never seen the light of day because of the backlash.

404 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:13:59pm

Who is running Fox Newsnews room? They type stuff like

The circumstances of the shooting were immediately clear as Nashville police continue to investigate.

but nothing else. Who writes like that? It looks like it could easily contain a typo.

405 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:15:02pm

btw...hows that liberal economic responsibility working out in CA?...or MI?...or NJ?....anyone?

406 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:15:18pm

Good Afternoon All!

I read the first 100 or so posts, and the themes are:

A. She quit, she's bad.
B. She quit, she's smart.
C. Walter L. Newton knows it all.

I'll go review some more if everyone else promises to stop posting until I'm done. No? Okay, I can take it. My two points.

1. Sarah stated that her family has accrued HALF A MILLION DOLLARS in legal fees. That's gonna leave a mark.
2. The great Rush Limbaugh has been quoted saying, "Liberals try to destroy those whom they fear. Look for who they are attacking,..." I forgot the rest. Sorry. I loved the post about scared Liberals 'leaving puddles'. Quelle mental picture!

407 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:15:22pm

re: #380 haakondahl

You know, I'd like to get iceweasel or avanti's take on the treatment of POTUS-affiliated children in the media. Amy smoked dope IN THE WHITE HOUSE, which was duly noted and briefly scandalous. Chelsea was savaged by perhaps three people, and just once per. The Bush girls were roughed up on a fairly regular basis, but usually no cause for outrage--just anger. Sarah Palin's children have been cleaned and filleted in the media. President Obama might as well not have children for all the media says, which is good.

Just thinking out loud, but I can't think of anything like it.

I think all children of politicians ought to be offlimits. It's just wrong.

OT: this is some happy news I was just here to leave:

Soldier who fought in pink boxers is home for Fourth

Nearly a year after serving in Afghanistan, the soldier unwittingly became an iconic image of the war after an Associated Press photograph showed him in a firefight, wearing “I Love NY” pink boxer shorts, a red T-shirt and flip flops. Although he was ribbed by fellow soldiers and worried he might get in trouble as the picture ran in newspapers nationwide in May, he was praised by many — including U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

“The enemy already knew where I was,” Boyd said, referring to whether his red shirt made him a target. “If they want to shoot at me, then that’s less fire they put on the guys that are pinned down, so that’s fine with me.”

All of the members of his unit made it back safely that day, he said.

As far as his wardrobe, his boxers are now headed to the 1st Infantry Division Museum at Fort Riley, Kan., he said.

Happy fourth!

408 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:15:34pm

re: #401 redc1c4

Shouldn't you be tending immoderate amounts of meat on that kick-ass grill of yours?

/not that I'm complaining! I've gotten a few chuckles from your posts today

409 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:15:44pm

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

410 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:16:07pm

re: #405 albusteve

btw...hows that liberal economic responsibility working out in CA?...or MI?...or NJ?....anyone?

They are doing about as good as Steve McNair.

411 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:16:42pm

re: #401 redc1c4

especially since they already have a party, they lust after power, but have no principles as you and i would know the concept.....

No you misunderstand. They want good for America. The kind of America where they decide what is good. And because they have only the best of intentions,(as long as they can stay in power,) The End Justifies The Means.

412 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:17:03pm

re: #410 VegasRick

They are doing about as good as Steve McNair.

oh man.....well that's true

413 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:17:21pm

re: #404 Roger

Who is running Fox Newsnews room? They type stuff like

The circumstances of the shooting were immediately clear as Nashville police continue to investigate.

but nothing else. Who writes like that? It looks like it could easily contain a typo.

Even if they had been having their negatives right, their tense will be all messed up.

414 NoWhereAlaska  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:17:52pm

There is vileness on the left that is hard to fathom. If anyone had subjected Obama’s children to even a small portion of the purification aimed at Palin’s kids, the repercussions would have been immediate and overwhelming.
The fact that the right is usually more restrained is a positive thing. The unfortunately some measure of the purification remains on the left’s victims. I listened to my father spout nonsense about Palin last fall. But since I am not the only Alaskan in the family, my father chose to believe the crap from the media and my sibling.
Even LGF has had its negative comments about Palin’s ‘creationist’ tendencies even though there is limited evidence that she holds such beliefs. Her father was a science teacher after all.
I will be watching to see what Alaskan attitudes are about her resignation. The legislature will be pleased. They had a hard time with her desire to limit government spending and save money for the future. The Statists of both parties will be pleased. But the people who elected her may accept that she is resigning to help the state. Or they may be angry because we have lost a damper on rampant state spending. But probably there will be both responses.
My first response was “that her resignation destroyed her viability for National office.” I am more circumspect today. I will wait and see.
I believe her resignation was a loss for our state, but my local community will probably benefit from her resignation. She did not view Ketchikan kindly.

415 UncleRancher  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:18:06pm

Who got shot? I just got here.

416 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:18:11pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

Right. That worked so well for Trig.

417 Wendya  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:18:38pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet.


How much "trouble" does a baby cause?

418 rain of lead  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:18:46pm

truly, we are through the looking glass, and falling further down the rabbit hole each day.

419 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:18:48pm

re: #415 UncleRancher

Who got shot? I just got here.

Steve McNair

420 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:18:59pm

re: #415 UncleRancher

Who got shot? I just got here.

the wrong guy

421 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:19:25pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

That's my belief as well. It's their age. If he gets a second term we'll see some fallout.

I also think the internet is to blame for a general coarsening of our national discourse and what we find acceptable. Photoshopped images of candidates or their children wouldn't have been around, once upon a time, or gotten such wide distribution.

That being said, I'm sure there are disgusting images of the whole Obama family already in existence in some of the fouler corners of the net. *shudder*

422 UncleRancher  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:19:28pm

re: #420 albusteve

the wrong guy

Roger that.

423 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:19:32pm

Whatever becomes known about the resignation further down the road, whatever anybody thinks of Palin as a past or future candidate, I will always be grateful to her for helping to reveal the true nature of the media, the Left, and the Republican establishment to anybody with the eyes to see it. I declare her a catalytic figure.

Also, her energizing effect, her ability to draw enthusiastic crowds with fairly simple virtues in spite of the attacks on her, in spite of whatever shortcomings she may have, shows the way to future conservatives who are really willing to speak to smaller and less-intrusive government. People don't respond to Democrat Lite and Republican tweaks of a system of spoils and handouts in the same way. They want real conservatism. They want at least two parties, not two wings of the same party.

424 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:19:50pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

nuance....spit

425 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:21:58pm

re: #421 iceweasel

That's my belief as well. It's their age. If he gets a second term we'll see some fallout.

I also think the internet is to blame for a general coarsening of our national discourse and what we find acceptable. Photoshopped images of candidates or their children wouldn't have been around, once upon a time, or gotten such wide distribution.

That being said, I'm sure there are disgusting images of the whole Obama family already in existence in some of the fouler corners of the net. *shudder*

Quite right. There is one anus who persists in drawing Barry and Michelle as monkeys, though even he leaves the kids out of it. Of course, his My Space page doesn't have quite the prominence of Huffpo.

426 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:22:31pm

re: #423 Wm T Sherman

Whatever becomes known about the resignation further down the road, whatever anybody thinks of Palin as a past or future candidate, I will always be grateful to her for helping to reveal the true nature of the media, the Left, and the Republican establishment to anybody with the eyes to see it. I declare her a catalytic figure.

Also, her energizing effect, her ability to draw enthusiastic crowds with fairly simple virtues in spite of the attacks on her, in spite of whatever shortcomings she may have, shows the way to future conservatives who are really willing to speak to smaller and less-intrusive government. People don't respond to Democrat Lite and Republican tweaks of a system of spoils and handouts in the same way. They want real conservatism. They want at least two parties, not two wings of the same party.

Great post!

427 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:22:33pm

re: #407 iceweasel

I think all children of politicians ought to be offlimits. It's just wrong.

Actually, I want to know if you agree that the media's treatment of Palin's family, in particular the children, is unprecedented in the Presidential neighborhood.

428 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:22:53pm

re: #421 iceweasel

That's my belief as well. It's their age. If he gets a second term we'll see some fallout.

I also think the internet is to blame for a general coarsening of our national discourse and what we find acceptable. Photoshopped images of candidates or their children wouldn't have been around, once upon a time, or gotten such wide distribution.

That being said, I'm sure there are disgusting images of the whole Obama family already in existence in some of the fouler corners of the net. *shudder*

blame the internet for foul behavior?....whatever....otherwise the sordid attacks on the Palin family were daily and very public, not hiding in dark corners somewhere....you sound like you are making excuses

429 sngnsgt  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:23:34pm

re: #356 VegasRick

Little gasoline. Well, it is July 4th.

Propane for the BOOM! factor. ;-)

430 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:24:01pm

re: #425 shiplord kirel

Quite right. There is one anus who persists in drawing Barry and Michelle as monkeys, though even he leaves the kids out of it. Of course, his My Space page doesn't have quite the prominence of Huffpo.

HuffPo is largely a toilet. (Apart from their recent stellar Iran coverage)

431 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:24:38pm

re: #429 sngnsgt

Propane for the BOOM! factor. ;-)

Where did the little asshole go?

432 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:24:47pm

re: #397 redc1c4

as much as you hate the whole "tea party" thing, you should be rejoicing.

I'd be happy to see the whole thing fizzle. It's just a source of craziness. Instapundit put up a few pics. Captions saying over a thousand attending, looks more like 2-300. It could have gone either way; Everybody has the day off today but I think most would rather BBQ and drink without the political speeches. We'll see what happens.

433 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:24:51pm

re: #414 NoWhereAlaska

"She did not view Ketchikan kindly."
Or, in other words...
"She Kast a Kold eye towards Ketchikan."
"Ketchikan Kould not Ketchibreak from Palin."

Thank you, NoWhere, WhereEver you are!

434 HoosierHoops  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:24:59pm

re: #430 iceweasel

HuffPo is largely a toilet. (Apart from their recent stellar Iran coverage)

Happy 4th ice!
Hope today finds you well....

435 talon_262  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:25:02pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

I won't be holding my breath waiting for the MFMSM to do to the Obama children what they've been doing to the Palins, vile and twisted as it is...I expect nothing less than the kid gloves treatment of the Obamas from the MFMSM from here to eternity, regardless of anything they do.

436 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:25:28pm

re: #414 NoWhereAlaska

She did not view Ketchikan kindly.

Ah, but who does? I take it that you are a Banana Republican, then?

437 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:25:58pm

re: #434 HoosierHoops

Happy 4th ice!
Hope today finds you well....

Hi Hoops! Happy 4th to you! I hope you're having a great day!

438 MandyManners  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:26:01pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

Trig Palin is old enough to be mocked as a "retard"? To have his parentage questioned? Really?

439 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:27:00pm

re: #366 Roger

Fox News is saying murder-suicide...

apparently Mcnair's mistress shot him and then shot herself ...

440 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:27:03pm

re: #438 MandyManners

Trig Palin is old enough to be mocked as a "retard"? To have his parentage questioned? Really?

Waiting........

441 formercorpsman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:27:29pm

Happy 4th.

442 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:27:50pm

re: #440 DEZes

Waiting........

It'll be a while.

443 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:27:51pm

re: #439 _RememberTonyC

apparently Mcnair's mistress shot him and then shot herself ...

a girlfriend?....uh oh

444 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:28:00pm

re: #427 haakondahl

Actually, I want to know if you agree that the media's treatment of Palin's family, in particular the children, is unprecedented in the Presidential neighborhood.

I think it is. I don't remember the treatment of Amy Carter. Chelsea definitely got some harsh treatment-- and the Bush twins got tons of unfair treatment as well. All of it is just wrong, IMO.

445 HoosierHoops  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:28:06pm

re: #437 iceweasel

Hi Hoops! Happy 4th to you! I hope you're having a great day!

It's raining like hell...ugly day out..
/The beer is cold

446 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:28:35pm

Ahmadinejad challenges Obama to live debate (link to Iranian state press site)

After his reelection as Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad extends an invitation to his American counterpart Barack Obama for a debate before the eyes of the world.

Addressing Iranian heads of medical universities on Saturday, President Ahmadinejad offered to debate President Obama at the United Nations headquarters in New York before the eyes of all nations of the world.

447 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:28:41pm

re: #435 talon_262

I won't be holding my breath waiting for the MFMSM to do to the Obama children what they've been doing to the Palins, vile and twisted as it is...I expect nothing less than the kid gloves treatment of the Obamas from the MFMSM from here to eternity, regardless of anything they do.

Today is the birthday of one of the Obama daughters.

448 _RememberTonyC  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:28:42pm

re: #443 albusteve

a girlfriend?....uh oh


preliminary info ... not 100% confirmed

449 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:28:57pm

re: #446 Killgore Trout

Ahmadinejad challenges Obama to live debate (link to Iranian state press site)

SMACK!

450 DEZes  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:29:00pm

re: #442 VegasRick

It'll be a while.

Yup, Mandy was spot on.

451 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:29:06pm

re: #446 Killgore Trout

Ahmadinejad challenges Obama to live debate (link to Iranian state press site)

Hahahahahahaha!

452 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:29:08pm

re: #416 pink freud

Right. That worked so well for Trig.

Trig didn't get make the news because of public drunkness or any other such scandal, but to Trisomy 21, which while an appalling line of attack, makes 0 sense for purposes of comparison, and likely had nothing to do with his age.

To clarify, I wasn't refering to their age as protecting them from the media, but as keeping them out of trouble. You hardly see any 10 year olds stumbling out of bars these days, but that has been known to happen to ~20 y/os visiting london.


On another note, the Secret Service has been especially tough on 'shielding' the obamas ever since the extra early threats he got, and looking up the scandals of previous presedential children revealed that the Secret Service does discourage snooping around the presidential family where it can. Put those two together, if you will. Its honestly not a very tight case, but it is a possible explanation of sorts.

453 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:29:52pm

The Tea Party crowd might get lucky. No Stormfront Tea Party thread yet. If the Nazis are attending they at least have the sense to be quiet about it.

454 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:30:10pm

re: #413 haakondahl

Now says:

The circumstances of the shooting weren't immediately clear as Nashville police continue to investigate.
455 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:30:25pm

re: #451 pink freud

They could debate the existence of gays in Iran.

456 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:30:43pm

re: #444 iceweasel

Chelsea definitely got some harsh treatment--


I'd like an example of that, with fries and a Coke, please.

457 VegasRick  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:30:58pm

re: #450 DEZes

Yup, Mandy was spot on.

Yep.

458 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:31:14pm

re: #452 Altermite

Trig didn't get make the news because of public drunkness or any other such scandal, but to Trisomy 21, which while an appalling line of attack, makes 0 sense for purposes of comparison, and likely had nothing to do with his age.

Weasel words. Smarmy. Is that the best you can do?

459 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:31:38pm

re: #428 albusteve

blame the internet for foul behavior?....whatever....otherwise the sordid attacks on the Palin family were daily and very public, not hiding in dark corners somewhere....you sound like you are making excuses

I'm not making any excuses. Nor am I defending the treatment of Palin or her family. I've said repeatedly here that I think Palin was subjected to constant vile sexist and unfair attacks. And again, her kids ought to have been off limits.

I only mention the internet to point out that because of it, disgusting smears that once would never have gotten currency in any public forum, now can be spread everywhere. I think it's pretty clear this is harmful.

460 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:32:01pm

re: #456 NelsFree

I'd like an example of that, with fries and a Coke, please.

If I remember correctly, some jerks on SNL made a crack about her looks. They shut up, apologized, and erased the segment from re-runs when Hillary jumped on them.

461 dmandman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:32:29pm

Here is an article from about 5 years ago....notice the tone towards upsetting a Democrats offspring compared with the GOP.

[Link: www.sfgate.com...]

462 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:32:32pm

re: #453 Killgore Trout

The Tea Party crowd might get lucky. No Stormfront Tea Party thread yet. If the Nazis are attending they at least have the sense to be quiet about it.

yes, well that makes sense doesn't it?.....hows that liberal fiscal responsibility working out in CA btw?

463 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:33:25pm

re: #438 MandyManners

Trig Palin is old enough to be mocked as a "retard"? To have his parentage questioned? Really?

See above. I don't think that the media gives a damn about anyones age, although they should.

464 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:33:38pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

I strongly disagree. There were no limits to what news media and celebrities were willing to say about Palin and her children, absolutely none. Her infant child Trig was savaged along with the rest of her family. Obama and his family are off-limits because there is an intense double standard at work. People should have been fired, condemned for what they wrote and said. That only would happen if Obama was targeted. This naked, coordinated, pitiless, ruthless partisanship is front and center in current events.

Remember, it wasn't just attacks on Palin and McCain. They went after individuals to whom Obama of his own volition, revealed too much. "Spread the wealth," remember? Obama admitted it; now he's doing it. "Joe isn't a real plumber. Joe's has back taxes. Joe owes child support." Remember? Government officials broke the law to dig that up. To them we are insects.

You and I could be next. It's not going to go away. I refuse to minimize it.

465 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:34:24pm

re: #459 iceweasel

I'm not making any excuses. Nor am I defending the treatment of Palin or her family. I've said repeatedly here that I think Palin was subjected to constant vile sexist and unfair attacks. And again, her kids ought to have been off limits.

I only mention the internet to point out that because of it, disgusting smears that once would never have gotten currency in any public forum, now can be spread everywhere. I think it's pretty clear this is harmful.

if it was only internet smears hardly anybody would even notice....the internet is irrelevant in Palins case...people behave properly or they don't...that's my point

466 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:34:36pm

re: #453 Killgore Trout

The Tea Party crowd might get lucky. No Stormfront Tea Party thread yet. If the Nazis are attending they at least have the sense to be quiet about it.

They made be sure afraid that old Killgore is gonna expose dem for wha they are... I's shaking in my boots.

467 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:35:50pm

re: #446 Killgore Trout

Ahmadinejad challenges Obama to live debate (link to Iranian state press site)

Rules:

President Obama is not allowed to use a TelePrompTer, must refrain from walking on water, and must not speak in rhetorical questions to himself answered by a single word.
Ahmadinejad is not allowed to use a step stool (or stack of phone books if seated), must refrain from casting a ghastly green aura about the place, and must not utter any phrase such as "Death to [object]", "Great Satan", or "blinding flash of light".

Or else it's the penalty box.

468 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:36:09pm

re: #458 pink freud

Weasel words. Smarmy. Is that the best you can do?

Cutting out half of what I typed and then accusing me of 'weasel words' is pretty rich.

To reiterate: Because they are young, the obama kids provide fewer opportunities for the media to seize onto.

469 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:38:06pm

re: #467 haakondahl

Rules:

President Obama is not allowed to use a TelePrompTer, must refrain from walking on water, and must not speak in rhetorical questions to himself answered by a single word.
Ahmadinejad is not allowed to use a step stool (or stack of phone books if seated), must refrain from casting a ghastly green aura about the place, and must not utter any phrase such as "Death to [object]", "Great Satan", or "blinding flash of light".

Or else it's the penalty box.

BO will be allowed to do ample political Moonwalking I assume?

470 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:38:19pm

re: #464 Wm T Sherman

I strongly disagree. There were no limits to what news media and celebrities were willing to say about Palin and her children, absolutely none. Her infant child Trig was savaged along with the rest of her family. Obama and his family are off-limits because there is an intense double standard at work. People should have been fired, condemned for what they wrote and said. That only would happen if Obama was targeted. This naked, coordinated, pitiless, ruthless partisanship is front and center in current events.

Remember, it wasn't just attacks on Palin and McCain. They went after individuals to whom Obama of his own volition, revealed too much. "Spread the wealth," remember? Obama admitted it; now he's doing it. "Joe isn't a real plumber. Joe's has back taxes. Joe owes child support." Remember? Government officials broke the law to dig that up. To them we are insects.

You and I could be next. It's not going to go away. I refuse to minimize it.

Exactly. What would have happened if that shithead who produces Family Guy had allowed Obama to be shown wearing a hammer and sickle pin during the campaign, as he showed McCain supporters with swastikas?
I don't hate these guys for their tiresome attempts to be "edgy" and "push the boundaries" (Lenny Bruce did it better 50 years ago). I hate them for their facetiously obvious hypocrisy, and their pious denials of their own cowardice in the face of genuine totalitarianism.

471 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:38:34pm

re: #464 Wm T Sherman

I strongly disagree. There were no limits to what news media and celebrities were willing to say about Palin and her children, absolutely none. Her infant child Trig was savaged along with the rest of her family. Obama and his family are off-limits because there is an intense double standard at work. People should have been fired, condemned for what they wrote and said. That only would happen if Obama was targeted. This naked, coordinated, pitiless, ruthless partisanship is front and center in current events.

Remember, it wasn't just attacks on Palin and McCain. They went after individuals to whom Obama of his own volition, revealed too much. "Spread the wealth," remember? Obama admitted it; now he's doing it. "Joe isn't a real plumber. Joe's has back taxes. Joe owes child support." Remember? Government officials broke the law to dig that up. To them we are insects.

You and I could be next. It's not going to go away. I refuse to minimize it.

Oh come on, lets get some balls.

Go look up some history and see how candidates publicly torn each other a new ass hole, look back oh let's say a hundred years.

Look up some history on yellow journalism.

Go back to the times when politicians were calling each other out for duels.

We've become a bunch of pansy's and it the left that has been drumming it into our head that we have to be politicly correct, while all the time they are talking all sorts of trash mouth.

Let's start fighting back for a change.

472 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:38:56pm

re: #456 NelsFree

I'd like an example of that, with fries and a Coke, please.

Ok. I can give you examples, but not Fries and a Coke. :)

John McCain: at a fundraiser in 98: "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?
Because Janet Reno is her father."

Here's an article from the WaPo in 96, which mentions how the Clintons tried to shield her, but weren't always successful:

"Saturday Night Live" saw fit to air a sketch that compared Chelsea, then 13, unfavorably with Vice President Gore's daughter. The first lady was furious about that, and even angrier when Rush Limbaugh took this shot: "Everyone knows the Clintons have a cat," said Limbaugh. "Socks is the White House cat. But did you know there is also a White House dog?" And he held up a picture of Chelsea.

[Link: www.washingtonpost.com...]

BTW, I'm only posting this because you asked me to. This isn't a race about who got beat up on more.

POTUS's kids do get picked on; it's always wrong, in my opinion, and Palin's family was subjected to an incredible level of personal attacks.

473 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:39:29pm

re: #468 Altermite

Cutting out half of what I typed and then accusing me of 'weasel words' is pretty rich.

To reiterate: Because they are young, the obama kids provide fewer opportunities for the media to seize onto.

Fewer than Trig, you mean? That was the original question.

474 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:39:32pm

re: #468 Altermite

Cutting out half of what I typed and then accusing me of 'weasel words' is pretty rich.

To reiterate: Because they are young, the obama kids provide fewer opportunities for the media to seize onto.

well golly...the MSM has standards of attack?.....the stuff you learn...what you are saying is almost meaningless

475 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:39:53pm

re: #405 albusteve

btw...hows that liberal economic responsibility working out in CA?...or MI?...or NJ?....anyone?

just like clockw*rk....... %-)

476 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:40:20pm

re: #466 Walter L. Newton

Forget about discussing the Tea Party phenomena with Killgore Trout. He told me he doesn't ever have to pay taxes so he doesn't understand the realities.

477 Tamron  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:40:45pm

re: #41 anotherindyfilmguy

It's one thing to fight for yourself and others but another to fight on when the people you are fighting for piss all over you just for you trying to fight for them in addition to your enemies. Add to that the fact that this far after the elections are long over she is still under constant attack with frivolous unfounded lawsuits and a press corp that is still searching for anything to bury her with. Perhaps she just wants to step out of the public life or at least get the attacks off of her family. Realistically if she were to run for POTUS she'd be running against her own party and all of it's enemies for a job that is hard enough to get even when your own party lines up to help... Maybe she just had enough and is a canary in the coal mine supposed Republicans should pay attention to...


Yup. Why hold onto a bull's tail, when he's crapping in your face?
.

478 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:40:59pm

re: #456 NelsFree

I'd like an example of that, with fries and a Coke, please.

I don't recall they were, but on at least two occasions, people with media access made over-the-top "ugly" comments about that teenage girl. These incidents were fairly rare, and the offenders seem to have been sufficiently thrashed that they didn't repeat the offense. I think.
So it was *nothing* like what has been done to Palin's family, but Chelsea was unfairly blasted at least a couple of times.

479 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:41:16pm

re: #476 Roger

Forget about discussing the Tea Party phenomena with Killgore Trout. He told me he doesn't ever have to pay taxes so he doesn't understand the realities.

Ok.

480 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:41:38pm

Dear Ice,

Reporter suspened for remark about Chelsea, 2008:
[Link: womensissues.about.com...]

John McCain criticized for commenting on Chelsea:
[Link: www.bluemassgroup.com...]

WaPo asks if it is okay to ask Chelsea about Monica:
[Link: voices.washingtonpost.com...]

Now, please find me one article that shows "harsh treatment" of Chelsea Clinton.

Love,
NelsFree
PS I don't want your brain now.

481 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:42:05pm

re: #475 redc1c4

just like clockw*rk....... %-)

people slam conservative policy then ignore a rebuttal....well I'll be

482 brockton808  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:42:21pm

If Ed Rollins says it, then it must be true. Then again, I'll withhold judgment until I hear Colin Powell's opinion on the matter.

483 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:42:23pm

re: #478 haakondahl

I don't recall they were, but on at least two occasions, people with media access made over-the-top "ugly" comments about that teenage girl. These incidents were fairly rare, and the offenders seem to have been sufficiently thrashed that they didn't repeat the offense. I think.
So it was *nothing* like what has been done to Palin's family, but Chelsea was unfairly blasted at least a couple of times.

There was also a joke John McCain himself told (doesn't bear repeating here).

484 pink freud  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:42:29pm

re: #468 Altermite

Cutting out half of what I typed and then accusing me of 'weasel words' is pretty rich.

To reiterate: Because they are young, the obama kids provide fewer opportunities for the media to seize onto.

You said "As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8 ...."

I responded, noting Trig's young age. Instead of defending your position, you used trisomy 21 as your example, somehow implying that if not for the trisomy 21 he would not have been a target (and therefore, NONE of them would have been a target?) Doesn't fly.

485 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:43:34pm

Are we still on the Palin story? That was so this morning.

486 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:43:42pm

re: #469 albusteve

BO will be allowed to do ample political Moonwalking I assume?

Where you going with that, man? It may be lonely over there.

487 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:43:49pm

re: #408 pink freud

Shouldn't you be tending immoderate amounts of meat on that kick-ass grill of yours?

/not that I'm complaining! I've gotten a few chuckles from your posts today

i grilled brunch, and am packing a picnic dinner for the Hollywood Bowl tonight.... Ooolog say 'burn meat tomorrow'. %-)

488 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:45:10pm

Another thing about Joe the Plumber, private citizen, little people. They tried to justify the smear job on him by saying McCain had made him into a public figure by mentioning him repeatedly during one of the debates. That's a lie. They started on him the moment that Obama beclowned himself in from of Joe's house. The outcome would have been exactly the same whether McCain mentioned him by name or not. McCain's bumbling use of Joe was a mistake. However, it was not the real justification for going after Joe. It was only used as cover after the fact.

Don't forget. Don't. This cynical, rancid crapola is the new normal. We are all fair game now. Any one of us can be fixed and personalized, Alinsky-style, the moment one of us "speaks truth to power" for real. The inconvenient issue raised, the foolish disclosure, is replaced by the demonized and ridiculed individual, and forgotten. Public figure or unknown individual, powerful or powerless, no distinction. They do it because it works.

A politician has to be able to take this in order to surivive, that's the deal. You have to ask yourself - can you take it? Did you agree to this deal? You did not.

489 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:45:32pm

re: #486 haakondahl

Where you going with that, man? It may be lonely over there.

appears to be moving forward while actually moving backward....another cool BO illusion....kinda like increasied spending to lower the deficit ett etc

490 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:46:04pm

re: #409 Altermite

As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8, which is a little young to be causing trouble just yet. If he makes it to a second term, then you can watch for them (at least the older one) to be old enough to do something dumb and embarrassing.

the MFM doesn't even cover the dumb and embarrassing things their alleged father does, so what makes you think they will cover them?

491 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:46:18pm

re: #477 Tamron

Yup. Why hold onto a bull's tail, when he's crapping in your face?
.

Well, it was better than the bull's first suggestion!

492 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:46:36pm

re: #464 Wm T Sherman

I strongly disagree. There were no limits to what news media and celebrities were willing to say about Palin and her children, absolutely none. Her infant child Trig was savaged along with the rest of her family. Obama and his family are off-limits because there is an intense double standard at work. People should have been fired, condemned for what they wrote and said. That only would happen if Obama was targeted. This naked, coordinated, pitiless, ruthless partisanship is front and center in current events.

Remember, it wasn't just attacks on Palin and McCain. They went after individuals to whom Obama of his own volition, revealed too much. "Spread the wealth," remember? Obama admitted it; now he's doing it. "Joe isn't a real plumber. Joe's has back taxes. Joe owes child support." Remember? Government officials broke the law to dig that up. To them we are insects.

You and I could be next. It's not going to go away. I refuse to minimize it.

I agree that the attacks on Palin's family were disgusting (I don't remember any on McCain's family from this election, although there were a few in a primary a few years back).
But the issue of partisan attacks doesn't detract from the fact that Obama's kids are 10 and 8, and almost every scandalous thing someone can do would need to wait about a term and a half for even the oldest, simply because 8 and 10 year olds don't do very much.

Now, if Malia grows up to be a plumber who owes back taxes, and the media doesn't call her out on it, well, then we have a situation.

493 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:47:12pm

re: #485 Walter L. Newton

Are we still on the Palin story? That was so this morning.

she's the M Jackson of LGF

494 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:48:14pm

re: #488 Wm T Sherman

Another thing about Joe the Plumber, private citizen, little people. They tried to justify the smear job on him by saying McCain had made him into a public figure by mentioning him repeatedly during one of the debates. That's a lie. They started on him the moment that Obama beclowned himself in from of Joe's house. The outcome would have been exactly the same whether McCain mentioned him by name or not. McCain's bumbling use of Joe was a mistake. However, it was not the real justification for going after Joe. It was only used as cover after the fact.

Don't forget. Don't. This cynical, rancid crapola is the new normal. We are all fair game now. Any one of us can be fixed and personalized, Alinsky-style, the moment one of us "speaks truth to power" for real. The inconvenient issue raised, the foolish disclosure, is replaced by the demonized and ridiculed individual, and forgotten. Public figure or unknown individual, powerful or powerless, no distinction. They do it because it works.

A politician has to be able to take this in order to surivive, that's the deal. You have to ask yourself - can you take it? Did you agree to this deal? You did not.

Really, the term "yellow kid journalism" around 1895. It was journalism that made sensation, unfound claims about all kinds of newsworthy subjects, including politicians and the man in the street.

This is nothing new, nothing.

We need to get some balls and start fighting back, not whining about it.

495 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:48:17pm

re: #480 NelsFree

Dear Ice,

Reporter suspened for remark about Chelsea, 2008:
[Link: womensissues.about.com...]

John McCain criticized for commenting on Chelsea:
[Link: www.bluemassgroup.com...]

WaPo asks if it is okay to ask Chelsea about Monica:
[Link: voices.washingtonpost.com...]

Now, please find me one article that shows "harsh treatment" of Chelsea Clinton.

Love,
NelsFree
PS I don't want your brain now.

You asked for examples of Chelsea being treated harshly. I provided them. Now you want to change the subject and talk about whether people were chastised for it.

We're done. Have a great fourth!

496 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:49:56pm

re: #494 Walter L. Newton

Really, the term "yellow kid journalism" around 1895. It was journalism that made sensation, unfound claims about all kinds of newsworthy subjects, including politicians and the man in the street.

This is nothing new, nothing.

We need to get some balls and start fighting back, not whining about it.

fighting is just so....aggressive!

497 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:49:59pm

re: #494 Walter L. Newton

Really, the term "yellow kid journalism" around 1895. It was journalism that made sensation, unfound claims about all kinds of newsworthy subjects, including politicians and the man in the street.

This is nothing new, nothing.

We need to get some balls and start fighting back, not whining about it.

So true. I've noted your various comments on this. What goes on in political campaigns now is no different than what happened in the 19th century. We bitch about the MSM now, but they were awful back then too.

498 Ojoe  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:50:17pm

re: #488 Wm T Sherman

They do it because it works.

It will work until someone calls them on it like this:

"You motherfucking low life son-of-a-bitch, shut the fuck up about my children."

I await this moment in US politics with great anticipation.

The king of Spain said something similar to Chavez and it was so popular that they made it into a cell phone ring.

499 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:51:00pm

re: #490 redc1c4

the MFM doesn't even cover the dumb and embarrassing things their alleged father does, so what makes you think they will cover them?

Did this thread just fly over the fucking cliff? "Alleged"? "Moonwalk"?

500 Baelzar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:51:42pm

Put plainly: If she plans on running for another office, then quitting was a mistake.

I'm not passing judgement on her reasons for quitting. I'm stating a simple fact. It's easy to use against her in a campaign. It can be made to make her look weak.

501 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:52:23pm

re: #498 Ojoe

once again...no guts no glory

502 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:53:06pm

re: #499 haakondahl

Did this thread just fly over the fucking cliff? "Alleged"? "Moonwalk"?

you don't did the Moonwalk?

503 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:53:30pm

re: #495 iceweasel

Oh, and thanks for answering my question, by the way. Don' wanna sound ungrateful.

504 Shiplord Kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:54:14pm

So, when do we get the LGF t-shirts, thongs, and ball caps?

505 Ojoe  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:54:30pm

re: #500 Baelzar

It can be made to make her look weak.

In whose eyes?

Maybe she quit to take care of her family.

Many would see that as a plus, and later she can give time to public service again.

In my book this qualifies her, not disqualifies.

Because she shows herself as not consumed by lust for power.

506 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:54:34pm

re: #484 pink freud

You said "As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8 ...."

I responded, noting Trig's young age. Instead of defending your position, you used trisomy 21 as your example, somehow implying that if not for the trisomy 21 he would not have been a target (and therefore, NONE of them would have been a target?) Doesn't fly.

re: #484 pink freud

You said "As a liberal of sorts, I'm going to warrant that the reason BHO's kids haven't been targeted is because they are 10 and 8 ...."

I responded, noting Trig's young age. Instead of defending your position, you used trisomy 21 as your example, somehow implying that if not for the trisomy 21 he would not have been a target (and therefore, NONE of them would have been a target?) Doesn't fly.

I believe that if Trig had not had Trisomy 21, there would have been no 'retard' crack. The abuse shoveled his way was all connected to it.

Before someone turns this into my somehow blaming Trig for both the genetic condition and the media abuse, that isn't the case.

What I've been trying to say is that the media typically fixates on some thing that they can spin as scandalous, and young children typically don't have that much that can be spun that way. Unfortunantely for the Palins, Trig in particular, he did, and the vultures predictably crouched around it.

507 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:55:04pm

re: #497 iceweasel

So true. I've noted your various comments on this. What goes on in political campaigns now is no different than what happened in the 19th century. We bitch about the MSM now, but they were awful back then too.

And I get tired when people whine about it. Attack back, show some balls, arguing about it doesn't stop it, it's been a part of politics forever, only recently have some people decided that it is not "proper" and whine about it, while they miss the rhetoric boat and get trashed in the meantime.

Sling a little mud, it works.

508 Ojoe  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:55:12pm

re: #501 albusteve

They'd get even worse language from me.

509 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:55:38pm

Whatever. It's past my bedtime, and this thread is getting a stink to it that I'm allergic to.
Not that I don't love all my lizards. Except Ming. She had to go. She's Merciless.

510 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:55:45pm

re: #471 Walter L. Newton

Oh come on, lets get some balls.

Go look up some history and see how candidates publicly torn each other a new ass hole, look back oh let's say a hundred years.

Look up some history on yellow journalism.

Go back to the times when politicians were calling each other out for duels.

We've become a bunch of pansy's and it the left that has been drumming it into our head that we have to be politicly correct, while all the time they are talking all sorts of trash mouth.

Let's start fighting back for a change.


People used to eat food that was heavily spiced to cover the spoiled taste; they got sick a lot. Doctors used to treat patients by bleeding them; they died. Alexander Hamilton was killed in a duel; the nation could have used him.

Just because it used to be that way does not mean accepting this crap without a fight now. Also, I am not aware of the press going after young children in the good old days to which you refer.

What about my other point? How much can you take, Walter? It's open season on you and me now, too, and that's all part of the same squalid continuum. The new deal is, we keep our heads down, or else they come after us with the power of the government and the media. This is not hyperbole, it is reality.

511 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:55:50pm

re: #503 haakondahl

Oh, and thanks for answering my question, by the way. Don' wanna sound ungrateful.

No prob, haak. I guess my answer is a bit disappointing to some. :)

How are you doing today?

512 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:56:05pm

re: #498 Ojoe

It will work until someone calls them on it like this:

"You motherfucking low life son-of-a-bitch, shut the fuck up about my children."

I await this moment in US politics with great anticipation.

The king of Spain said something similar to Chavez and it was so popular that they made it into a cell phone ring.

That is so true, great point.

513 Ojoe  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:57:23pm

re: #512 Walter L. Newton

Thank you Walter.

Happy 4th of July to you.

514 haakondahl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:57:39pm

re: #506 Altermite

I believe that if Trig had not had Trisomy 21, there would have been no 'retard' crack. The abuse shoveled his way was all connected to it.

You figure that out by yourself, or did Ming scratch your scalp with her index finger while you rolled your eyes up in thought?

515 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:58:13pm

re: #507 Walter L. Newton

And I get tired when people whine about it. Attack back, show some balls, arguing about it doesn't stop it, it's been a part of politics forever, only recently have some people decided that it is not "proper" and whine about it, while they miss the rhetoric boat and get trashed in the meantime.

Sling a little mud, it works.

the left conjured up this phony PC thing years ago, knowing full well they were using it as a weapon to muffle discourse from the right....the right took it hook line and sinker and now can't see they were scammed...another reason the GOP is a failure imo of course

516 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:58:38pm

re: #510 Wm T Sherman

People used to eat food that was heavily spiced to cover the spoiled taste; they got sick a lot. Doctors used to treat patients by bleeding them; they died. Alexander Hamilton was killed in a duel; the nation could have used him.

Just because it used to be that way does not mean accepting this crap without a fight now. Also, I am not aware of the press going after young children in the good old days to which you refer.

What about my other point? How much can you take, Walter? It's open season on you and me now, too, and that's all part of the same squalid continuum. The new deal is, we keep our heads down, or else they come after us with the power of the government and the media. This is not hyperbole, it is reality.

Er, speak for yourself. WE don't keep our heads down, maybe YOU do. Have you paid attention to my posting here? I mean on a regular basis. Walter does not keep his head down.

You go ahead and hide, I've got you back.

517 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:59:02pm

re: #507 Walter L. Newton

And I get tired when people whine about it. Attack back, show some balls, arguing about it doesn't stop it, it's been a part of politics forever, only recently have some people decided that it is not "proper" and whine about it, while they miss the rhetoric boat and get trashed in the meantime.

Sling a little mud, it works.

Have to agree. Many Democrats bitched and moaned about their press in the 90's and right after the 2000 election; that didn't help them win anything.

It's a dirty business, politics. We can talk about why things shouldn't be this way, but that isn't going to change the way things are.

518 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:59:20pm

re: #481 albusteve

people slam conservative policy then ignore a rebuttal....well I'll be

i figured the / was obvious.... i live in the PRC, and the policies are w*rking just like clockw*rk: the whole state is going right down the drain, just like they planned.

519 reine.de.tout  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:00:32pm

re: #438 MandyManners

Trig Palin is old enough to be mocked as a "retard"? To have his parentage questioned? Really?

Trig Palin is under fire because his mother had the nerve to give birth to him, rather than "terminating" the "pregnancy".

520 Ojoe  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:01:28pm

re: #519 reine.de.tout

Dante has a place for those who attack Trig.

BBL

521 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:01:30pm

re: #490 redc1c4

the MFM doesn't even cover the dumb and embarrassing things their alleged father does, so what makes you think they will cover them?

Yes, they do. Not all of it does, but the media isn't solely leftist. Despite what you may have been told, conservative journalists and reporters and such are still part of the media.

Now, the leftist bias of a large segement of the media will mean that they spin it better and/or don't spend as much time covering it. But you are hearing about it from somewhere, and that is still part of the media.

Also, I'm not sure WTF 'alleged father' is supposed to mean, but its about as pretty as the 'alleged mother' comments directed towards someone else just last year. I'm hoping like hell that you knew that, and were just trying to point out what was unfortunantely allowed to fly back then.

522 Walter L. Newton  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:02:59pm

re: #517 iceweasel

Have to agree. Many Democrats bitched and moaned about their press in the 90's and right after the 2000 election; that didn't help them win anything.

It's a dirty business, politics. We can talk about why things shouldn't be this way, but that isn't going to change the way things are.

And pleas, all Lizards, I'm not condoning any of this. But it happens, we should be ready to respond back and make a good show of it. We can leave the sociology to the professors.

523 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:03:06pm

re: #504 Shiplord Kirel

So, when do we get the LGF t-shirts, thongs, and ball caps?

the thongs are only available preworn by FBV.....

/regular or extra crispy %-)

524 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:03:13pm

re: #517 iceweasel

Have to agree. Many Democrats bitched and moaned about their press in the 90's and right after the 2000 election; that didn't help them win anything.

It's a dirty business, politics. We can talk about why things shouldn't be this way, but that isn't going to change the way things are.

they deserved to be exposed for the fools they were back then too...they had zero to bitch about and they knew it....the seeds of BDS sown right there...phony as a three dollar bill...

525 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:04:00pm

re: #87 The Shadow Do

Yup, she quit a lame duck post. So what? Why do you even care?

I am not going to comment on her decision.

But Shadow, just for clarity, she was serving her first term. She was only a lame duck if she chose not run for re-election. Most folks yesterday were expecting that *that* was going to be the subject of the announcement. And as for her persecution, you should know that most of the ethics enquiries were initiated by Republicans like Andree McLeod, not Dem oppos.

526 albusteve  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:04:34pm

re: #522 Walter L. Newton

And pleas, all Lizards, I'm not condoning any of this. But it happens, we should be ready to respond back and make a good show of it. We can leave the sociology to the professors.

I condone it...the country is at stake

527 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:04:55pm

re: #490 redc1c4

the MFM doesn't even cover the dumb and embarrassing things their alleged father does, so what makes you think they will cover them?

Do you think it appropriate that they *do* be covered?

528 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:05:21pm

re: #514 haakondahl

You figure that out by yourself, or did Ming scratch your scalp with her index finger while you rolled your eyes up in thought?

If you want to accuse me of being a sock puppet, then take some of Walter's advice. Stop pussyfooting around and do it.

I'm going to tell you that I am not. If you are terribly concerned, voice those concerns to someone who can verify that I am not a sockpuppet.

529 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:06:38pm

re: #521 Altermite

Yes, they do. Not all of it does, but the media isn't solely leftist. Despite what you may have been told, conservative journalists and reporters and such are still part of the media.

Now, the leftist bias of a large segement of the media will mean that they spin it better and/or don't spend as much time covering it. But you are hearing about it from somewhere, and that is still part of the media.

Also, I'm not sure WTF 'alleged father' is supposed to mean, but its about as pretty as the 'alleged mother' comments directed towards someone else just last year. I'm hoping like hell that you knew that, and were just trying to point out what was unfortunantely deliberately allowed to fly back then.

sauce is sauce, i always say.....

BTW: FTFY!

530 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:06:40pm

re: #527 austin_blue

Do you think it appropriate that they *do* be covered?

And *alleged*? Want to expand on that? Are you insinuating that the POTUS is gay? Serious innuendo, dude.

531 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:07:57pm

re: #506 Altermite

Actually, Trig was a target and would have been one regardless of his condition. There were tons of rumours about who his 'real' mother was; Andrew Sullivan in particular was completely shameless about flogging that right up til the election. I can't stand Sully-- but remember this is a guy blogging for the Atlantic! not just some random diarist on dKos.

Also, when people weren't doubting Palin was his mother, they were saying she must be an uncaring mother because of the circumstances of his birth (she flew back to AK to have him.) That makes no sense either: the woman already had 4 children, of course she wanted to be with the doctors and hospitals and ob/gyns she'd used before. It was no one's damn business but hers, yet everyone felt entitled to judge her on it.

Finally, when people weren't pushing either of the above smears, they were oh-so-piously wondering if she could be a good parent to Trig and a VP-- NOT a question that would ever have been asked of a male candidate.

I wasn't a Palin fan, but there is no doubt in my mind that she was subjected to unfair attacks, many of them sexist, and many of them involving Trig.

532 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:08:40pm

re: #525 austin_blue

I am not going to comment on her decision.

for clarity, she was serving her first term. She was only a lame duck if she chose not run for re-election.

Actually, she wouldn't have been a lame duck even then. The common usage of the term is a politician who cannot run again, due to term limits or other factors, not to someone who chooses not to run for a post they're able to hold.

It may be a minor point, but the improper usage of the term is grating.

533 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:09:22pm

re: #464 Wm T Sherman

A slammin' good post! UPding!

Also, thank you for all the Lizards who posted articles about 'harsh treatment' of First Children. LGF is a wonderful way to get info!

534 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:10:05pm

re: #482 brockton808

If Ed Rollins says it, then it must be true. Then again, I'll withhold judgment until I hear Colin Powell's opinion on the matter.

You DID forget your /sarc tag

535 Tats66  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:10:27pm

it appears to me, and I may be wrong of course, but Palin is getting slammed from all directions for NOT following the standard political path or pattern? Sure seems like the theres alot of politicians that DIDNT resign their post mid term because to everyone else it wld seem to be a political mistake, there are others that DIDNT seem to prioritize their families hardships before their own political aspirations, there are others that DIDNT stray from whats percieved as the proper political path to their desired offices..........those that are in power now......hows that workin out for us all now?

probably rambling, just thinking aloud.....food for thought

536 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:11:02pm

re: #527 austin_blue

Do you think it appropriate that they *do* be covered?

cover everyone, or cover no one. apply the policy equally for all, or admit you have a bias.

since the MFM insists that the extended family members of all conservatives are open season, it's only fair that the policy extend the other way too. after all, Ear Leader is all about "fair".

the other option is to dial back coverage to *only* the candidate themselves, and their positions, but the MFM can't do that and still support their goals.

537 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:11:44pm

re: #525 austin_blue

I am not going to comment on her decision.

But Shadow, just for clarity, she was serving her first term. She was only a lame duck if she chose not run for re-election. Most folks yesterday were expecting that *that* was going to be the subject of the announcement. And as for her persecution, you should know that most of the ethics enquiries were initiated by Republicans like Andree McLeod, not Dem oppos.

This is true. One of the issues not being raised right now (here) is that Palin had many enemies within the Alaska GOP. Those ethics complaints weren't all being filed by Dems who were out to get her.

Even if she had chosen to run again, it is entirely possible that she would have faced a challenger in the primary.

538 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:13:16pm

re: #529 redc1c4

sauce is sauce, i always say.....

BTW: FTFY!

re: #537 iceweasel

This is true. One of the issues not being raised right now (here) is that Palin had many enemies within the Alaska GOP. Those ethics complaints weren't all being filed by Dems who were out to get her.

Even if she had chosen to run again, it is entirely possible that she would have faced a challenger in the primary.

She ran as an independent in Alaska, IIRC. That was supposed to be part of her appeal on the ticket. When she came out swinging for the GOP, that was largely overshadowed.

539 Shiplord Kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:15:16pm

My gut feeling (not represented as an objective source) is that Palin has some kind of trouble brewing, either with her personal life or ethics investigations.
She is defying all political wisdom by resigning, especially this early. You don't get promoted by deserting your post.

540 sagehen  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:16:03pm

re: #492 Altermite

I agree that the attacks on Palin's family were disgusting (I don't remember any on McCain's family from this election, although there were a few in a primary a few years back).


That would be the South Carolina 2000 primary, when Bush operatives the word that McCain fathered a black child. They claimed his adopted daughter Bridget (from India) was actually his illegitimate daughter that he'd had with a black prostitute. Fliers on car windshields, robocalls, etc.

When McCain confronted Bush about it, Bush shrugged and said "hey, nothing personal, it's just politics." The operatives in question ended up working for the McCain 2008 campaign. Mark McKinnon's remark when he heard about the hire -- "What are they going to say about Obama, that he fathered two black children?"

541 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:16:40pm

re: #537 iceweasel

This is true. One of the issues not being raised right now (here) is that Palin had many enemies within the Alaska GOP. Those ethics complaints weren't all being filed by Dems who were out to get her.

Even if she had chosen to run again, it is entirely possible that she would have faced a challenger in the primary.

every single ethics charge has been disproved........ that's an orchestrated harassment campaign. there ought to be a way to make the filer pay all costs if it's dismissed.

542 sagehen  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:17:17pm

re: #525 austin_blue

And as for her persecution, you should know that most of the ethics enquiries were initiated by Republicans like Andree McLeod, not Dem oppos.

One of them, the troopergate investigation, was initiated by Sarah herself.

543 redc1c4  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:18:29pm

re: #542 sagehen

One of them, the troopergate investigation, was initiated by Sarah herself.

because she was being slandered on the side. it too proved she'd done nothing wrong. this is all so much bullshit.

544 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:18:32pm

re: #536 redc1c4

cover everyone, or cover no one. apply the policy equally for all, or admit you have a bias.

since the MFM insists that the extended family members of all conservatives are open season, it's only fair that the policy extend the other way too. after all, Ear Leader is all about "fair".

the other option is to dial back coverage to *only* the candidate themselves, and their positions, but the MFM can't do that and still support their goals.

Ever since Rush referred to Chelsea Clinton as the "family dog", I've decided negative reporting or commentary on kids should be off-limits until they break the law.

545 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:20:08pm

re: #531 iceweasel

Actually, Trig was a target and would have been one regardless of his condition. There were tons of rumours about who his 'real' mother was; Andrew Sullivan in particular was completely shameless about flogging that right up til the election. I can't stand Sully-- but remember this is a guy blogging for the Atlantic! not just some random diarist on dKos.

Also, when people weren't doubting Palin was his mother, they were saying she must be an uncaring mother because of the circumstances of his birth (she flew back to AK to have him.) That makes no sense either: the woman already had 4 children, of course she wanted to be with the doctors and hospitals and ob/gyns she'd used before. It was no one's damn business but hers, yet everyone felt entitled to judge her on it.

Finally, when people weren't pushing either of the above smears, they were oh-so-piously wondering if she could be a good parent to Trig and a VP-- NOT a question that would ever have been asked of a male candidate.

I wasn't a Palin fan, but there is no doubt in my mind that she was subjected to unfair attacks, many of them sexist, and many of them involving Trig.

I honestly didn't hear the complaints about Trig and 'real mother' crap without that being in context of his condition, several of which took an incredibly stupid form. (Not just mean, but plain dumb)

Like I've said, Palin was the victim of some blatantly sexist and vile attacks. My post on the matter was responding to the question about obama's kids, though. If you ask me whether or not Palin was targeted far more harshly than Obama by networks like MSNBC, I'd say she absolutely was- its beyond question. But the original quesiton was why the Obama kids haven't been targeted like the kids of previous presidents.

546 NelsFree  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:20:42pm

re: #539 Shiplord Kirel

My gut feeling (not represented as an objective source) is that Palin has some kind of trouble brewing, either with her personal life or ethics investigations.
I bet she surprises her critics in the long run

She is defying all political wisdom by resigning, especially this early. You don't get promoted by deserting your post.


Democrats, on the other hand, get promoted for failing.

547 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:20:43pm

re: #542 sagehen

One of them, the troopergate investigation, was initiated by Sarah herself.

The troopergate investigation is also responsible for some 2/3rds of costs in legal fees.

548 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:21:18pm

re: #166 hazzyday

Just the fact that she doesn't want her young daughters to be a target of dirty old pedophiles like David Letterman in the front page of national magazines is probably enough motive to move to a stronger place in life.

I don't see how Palin can avoid being the target of comedians and criticism unless she leaves public life altogether. If she has a new career planned, it will depend 100% on the name recognition she's worked very hard to achieve. Can you picture her working behind the scenes, in any venue?

549 Wm T Sherman  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:22:01pm

re: #516 Walter L. Newton

Er, speak for yourself. WE don't keep our heads down, maybe YOU do. Have you paid attention to my posting here? I mean on a regular basis. Walter does not keep his head down.

You go ahead and hide, I've got you back.

Walter, you're not going to come to anybody's attention "Joe the Plumber" style by posting on this blog. It will come when you truly embarrass a public figure, intentionally or not. I'm not saying don't do it. I'm saying, this new paradigm is profoundly evil.

I don't know if you have any young children of your own. I do. As a result, politics aside, I don't get to take offense as easily as I used to. No more taking umbrage when somebody cuts me off in traffic. You can call that cowardly if you want. My blood pressure rises as I try to sit there and take it. I've been talked into believing it is a moral obligation. I fucking hate it. You can believe there will be conflict in my marriage if I smart-mouth or embarrass somebody in power and bring 'the treatment' down on my head. It's my world. Call that whatever you want. I don't resent it.

There is a point beyond which I will not be pushed. But, do you agree that the ante has been raised by this new standard?

I wonder if having private government information released illegally and spun dishonestly by the press is the final word here. Maybe it's not.

1. When medical records, and other records, are in government databases, there will be new opportunities for abusing access to data by partisan government employees.

2. Our new overlords are showing a disturbing tendency to take it to the next level, for example, identifying home addresses and encouraging mobs go to go there.

I would not make too many assumptions about what the experience being targeted wuld entail. You won't really know until it happens.

Just because I all point this out does not mean I'm a pussy, Walter. Don't give me that crap about covering for me. It's not warranted and I don't accept it.

550 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:22:24pm

re: #548 ShanghaiEd

I don't see how Palin can avoid being the target of comedians and criticism unless she leaves public life altogether. If she has a new career planned, it will depend 100% on the name recognition she's worked very hard to achieve. Can you picture her working behind the scenes, in any venue?

She recently signed a $12 million book deal w/ Murdoch.

551 shiplord kirel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:22:28pm

re: #546 NelsFree

Democrats, on the other hand, get promoted for failing.

Drunk on duty doesn't count.

552 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:23:44pm

Rollins is wrong..Sarah is now free to work to 2010 and 2012 for the party and herself.

Anyone who is calling her a "quitter" here is saying they think people who run for office and ignoring the job they were elected for is somehow superior.

Senator Kerry missed votes 90% of time he was campaigning and So did Hillary, Obama, and McCain. Who wants to pretend they were "doing their jobs justice?"

553 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:25:48pm

re: #552 quiet man

Rollins is wrong..Sarah is now free to work to 2010 and 2012 for the party and herself.

Anyone who is calling her a "quitter" here is saying they think people who run for office and ignoring the job they were elected for is somehow superior.

Senator Kerry missed votes 90% of time he was campaigning and So did Hillary, Obama, and McCain. Who wants to pretend they were "doing their jobs justice?"

I've always thought of elected office as a contract between the citizen's and the elected official.

554 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:26:33pm

re: #545 Altermite

I honestly didn't hear the complaints about Trig and 'real mother' crap without that being in context of his condition, several of which took an incredibly stupid form. (Not just mean, but plain dumb)

You're right. I think they were always phrased in the context of his condition.

Given the nature of some of the other attacks on her, though, I believe those 'real mother' attacks would have been raised anyway.

Take, for example, the persistent crap about Bristol being Trig's mom. That was ridiculous, and if anything his condition should have disproved that rumour to people-- the odds of a teenage girl having a baby with his condition are much lower than for someone of Palin's age. Yet those rumours remained-- which is one of my reasons for suspecting that the other attacks around Trig would also have happened, regardless of his condition.

The rumour mongerers were equally happy to ignore his condition when it would refute their rumour, and happy to play it up when it suited them.

555 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:26:56pm

re: #550 austin_blue

Let her work in front of the scenes now. In 2010, where will be the voice of the republicans and who else has the balls to call Obama and his little trained minions out? Rush, Hannity, Beck, and Ann Coulter could be used to lead the charges...but for obvious reasons, I prefer Sarah Palin taking on the job.

556 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:27:48pm

re: #548 ShanghaiEd

I don't see how Palin can avoid being the target of comedians and criticism unless she leaves public life altogether. If she has a new career planned, it will depend 100% on the name recognition she's worked very hard to achieve. Can you picture her working behind the scenes, in any venue?

Yah but her kids and Pres Obama kids should be off limits in the mucky political struggles. The political leaders should make the effort.

557 Tamron  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:28:26pm

re: #71 capitalist piglet

I have been agreeing with you more and more lately, Walter, but I have a different take on this one. What I hear is, "You're a whore, you're kid is a pathetic retard that should have been aborted, your daughters are sluts who'd have sex with anybody, you're a f***ing moron, we're going to harass you out of office and bankrupt you with lawsuits we know are bullshit, we'll make t-shirts calling you a c___ and wear them in public...and then we'll call you a quitter." Who the hell could blame her? Who else has endured anything like this in American history?


Right on. As an Alaskan acquaintance of Sarah Palin, I have no problem whatsoever with her latest decision. The State of Alaska is not currently in a crisis mode, and she's turning her job over to a competent replacement. It's a step sideways, not downwards.

As a private citizen, she can now exercise rights of legal defense that she didn't have while in office. For example, watch what happens the next time the likes of Letterman tries to insult the Palin family.

I don't have the exact count, but there were over 30 baseless harassing complaints filed against Sarah (as Governor) where she now has to personally foot the legal bills for her own defense. The State can't legally defend her against such complaints, while her detractors have virtually no restrictions on the amount of trivial crap they can make up, nor do they have to pay court/legal fees. There was a movement afoot to nickle-and-dime her to death, and she's just freed herself from that restriction.

Write a book, do some national speaking engagements, put a few bucks in the bank, and then from a position of strength as a private citizen, nail the slimy bastards, Sarah.

This is bigger than it looks. Any one of us, if we'd have been caught up in her position with her attitude and capabilities, would have been deliberately slimed, libeled and slandered by the liberal Dem steamroller under the same circumstances that she faced over the past year. Many common folk identify with her, seeing a bit of themselves in what happened. Therefore she has a strong national following who will be cheering from the sidelines, if she does what I think she will do. She's a scrapper, but so far her hands have been tied.

We're quite interested in seeing the other shoe drop.

(What does Bill Clinton currently charge for giving a speech? Isn't it around $100,000. per hour?)
.

558 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:28:35pm

re: #40 Fluffy Bunny

All of this "quitter" static is funny to me. People move on in the corporate world all the time, moving on to bigger and better things is encouraged, except, I guess, in the case of Sarah Palin. Time.will.tell.

Quitting as governor mid-term is a bit different than taking another job.

559 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:29:35pm

re: #553 austin_blue


Then who deserves the most damnation from you..Sarah Palin who didnt allow her national ambition to hit her state office, or all those who hold office and miss votes, travel everywhere doing the same thing as she will be doing, and allowing their state jobs to continue on without their attention?

560 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:29:50pm

re: #550 austin_blue

She recently signed a $12 million book deal w/ Murdoch.

I hadn't heard about that. It offers yet another reason to bail - frankly, if I had a quarter of that amount in the bank, I'd quit my job tomorrow, because it would give me enough to retire on - in style - without ever having to touch the principle. For the full $12 million, I'd be out the door in a heartbeat.

561 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:30:43pm

re: #556 hazzyday

Yah but her kids and Pres Obama kids should be off limits in the mucky political struggles. The political leaders should make the effort.

How about Mr. Palin and Mrs. Obama? Fair game, or off limits?

562 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:31:15pm

If you're a mom or girlfriend or daughter walking through the sometimes very violent streets of downtown Seattle. You are much more likely to be assaulted based on the perception that your weaker gender can be assaulted like that. Men can get into trouble but it's more likely because they put themselves into unsavory situation. Late at night in an alley after a bar closes. Buying drugs. Women can just be shopping in broad daylight.

People who don't recognize that fact contribute to the problem.

Sarah Palin is just experiencing this in the political arena.

563 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:31:25pm

re: #558 SanFranciscoZionist
How are the two different? Besides what job would let you follow your desire and remain a half assed worker for them. that is.

564 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:33:19pm

re: #559 quiet man

Then who deserves the most damnation from you..Sarah Palin who didnt allow her national ambition to hit her state office, or all those who hold office and miss votes, travel everywhere doing the same thing as she will be doing, and allowing their state jobs to continue on without their attention?

Dude, really, she did exactly that last year while running for VP and she would not have done that again until after 2010, the remainder of her term, since the Prez campaign won't crank up *until* 2010!

565 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:33:43pm

re: #561 ShanghaiEd

How about Mr. Palin and Mrs. Obama? Fair game, or off limits?

Traditionally no. But I think in the massive media we have today the images of them should be more positive. The first spouse I like as a person who is a behind the scenes ambassador. Mucking them up in the media does a public disservices to everyone. But people have those attractions to see people who are famous getting pilloried.

566 BigJohn  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:34:31pm

Palin's decision may be a stroke of genius. She can start running for POTUS right now. She can go on the road, promote her book, and start hammering away at that Freaking Socialist that is in office now. Every time she gets on camera she needs to hammer the One and tell the media she doesn't give a shit what they think of her.

567 hazzyday  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:36:22pm

re: #558 SanFranciscoZionist

Quitting as governor mid-term is a bit different than taking another job.

Without clarification I don't have a good view of that mid-term exit.

I had a CEO that did that once and I never thought much of him afterwards as a CEO. He had family issues and had applied for 3 jobs. Took ours, then got the other one. Decided to bail for a better opportunity. I think life suggests that there was opportunity where one was at.

568 Capoftex  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:36:47pm

Hey Ed, time for you to head out to pasture there bud. Let's see, he gave us The Huckster, who don't any of you forget, was it in the South Carolina (?) primary, pulled a fast one and gave his delegates (or something like this) to McCain, which helped McCain stay alive. We could have had a real candidate, but instead we got McCain.

Listening to Ed Rollins is part of the reason we are where we are now.

569 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:36:48pm

re: #564 austin_blue
Given what she has said previously, most likely she wants to stop the mountain of manure Obama. Pelosi and Reid and unleashed on this country by defeating the democrats in 2010

570 Tats66  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:38:22pm

How does this hurt her future ambitions? Seriously, a war hero, full time Governor, lotsa experience, just got bitch slapped by a product of a corrupt political machine, with shady associates, and oh, yeah, less governing exp than palin has right now.....and shes deemed dead in the water?

571 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:39:30pm

re: #569 quiet man

Given what she has said previously, most likely she wants to stop the mountain of manure Obama. Pelosi and Reid and unleashed on this country by defeating the democrats in 2010

Then she should have said so. Stated that she was turning over the Gov job to the LtGov to respond to a "higher calling", or some such.

572 Tats66  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:39:35pm

Senator*

573 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:39:45pm

re: #566 BigJohn

Palin's decision may be a stroke of genius. She can start running for POTUS right now. She can go on the road, promote her book, and start hammering away at that Freaking Socialist that is in office now. Every time she gets on camera she needs to hammer the One and tell the media she doesn't give a shit what they think of her.

You know, I was hoping that nobody suggested this as an idea, because I really don't think it is anything near a stroke of genius.

Stepping down to defend against harassing litigation is one thing, or to protect one's family. I can understand quitting for that reason, as I would do it.

Quitting your own job to criticize someone else's job is not going to win you very many points, no matter how valid your points may be. It also takes all the venom out of the criticism that Obama is a celeb president who is already back on/never got off the campaign trail.

574 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:41:20pm

re: #571 austin_blue

Nope..She doesnt need to say so..the country is abuzz with this news..even took Jackson off the air

Sarah is playing her card close to her jerkin..and given the typical liberal media and spokesperson response, who can blame her?

575 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:41:38pm

re: #570 Tats66

How does this hurt her future ambitions? Seriously, a war hero, full time Governor, lotsa experience, just got bitch slapped by a product of a corrupt political machine, with shady associates, and oh, yeah, less governing exp than palin has right now.....and shes deemed dead in the water?

? Did I miss something?

576 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:44:55pm

re: #570 Tats66

How does this hurt her future ambitions? Seriously, a war hero, full time Governor, lotsa experience, just got bitch slapped by a product of a corrupt political machine, with shady associates, and oh, yeah, less governing exp than palin has right now.....and shes deemed dead in the water?

The problem is simple - if she quit because she couldn't take the heat, she'll have that "Quitter" label tattooed on her forehead forever. Postulating Palin as President following 0bama, by which time the economy may very well be in a complete shambles and our foreign policy little more than a smoking crater, will put her in a position where criticism of her every action will be orders of magnitude worse than anything that's been thrown at her to date, and there will be much, much more of it. The question then becomes: will she quit, or will she stick around to finish the job?

That's assuming that the criticism was her reason for resigning. Although that's the explanation being circulated by her aides, it isn't clear to me yet that it's correct. I await further information. But politically, this is at least potentially an extremely damaging move, quite possibly a career ending move, it the reason offered is simply a thin skin.

577 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:45:38pm

re: #575 austin_blue
Yes you missed answering my 559 question to you

578 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:46:36pm

re: #577 quiet man

Yes you missed answering my 559 question to you

Check my 564.

579 Grand Poobah  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:48:17pm

re: #364 Altermite

Huckabee is a nut. Never trust pastors turned politicians. Or politicians from Arkansas (Clinton is from Arkansas).

580 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:48:35pm

Another problem: Palin re: #573 Altermite

It also takes all the venom out of the criticism that Obama is a celeb president who is already back on/never got off the campaign trail.

Exactly.
And also:
Palin resigned from her last statewide office -- chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. She quit her position at AOGCC and she has now quit her governorship.
Any politician running against her is going to play that up. Including other members of the GOP in any primary.

581 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:50:01pm

re: #576 SixDegrees


Can you imagine if Obama had to take 1/4 the insults Sarah has had to face? The guy is thin skinned to a fault. Sarah never said she was quitting politics..mainly she didnt like lame duck status

582 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:50:01pm

re: #580 iceweasel

Another problem: Palin

Exactly.
And also:
Palin resigned from her last statewide office -- chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. She quit her position at AOGCC and she has now quit her governorship.
Any politician running against her is going to play that up. Including other members of the GOP in any primary.

Do you know what the circumstances of her previous resignation were?

583 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:50:01pm

re: #565 hazzyday

Traditionally no. But I think in the massive media we have today the images of them should be more positive. The first spouse I like as a person who is a behind the scenes ambassador. Mucking them up in the media does a public disservices to everyone. But people have those attractions to see people who are famous getting pilloried.

I agree. I consider myself fairly jaded where reading blog abuse is concerned, but the combination of misogyny and racism in the abuse of Michelle Obama in some blogs is by far the ugliest I've seen. And it's not just from the White Supremacist crowd.

584 Ojoe  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:51:00pm

re: #580 iceweasel

Including other members of the GOP in any primary.

She should quit the GOP as well.

Most people now despise both parties.

585 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:53:04pm

re: #578 austin_blue

Yes, she did that last year and her approval rating fell from 80 to 50

Is that running around really better than quitting her lame duck status, making a mint on her book, and galvanizing the republican base when we are so hurting on leadership?

586 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:53:55pm

re: #582 SixDegrees

Do you know what the circumstances of her previous resignation were?

Yes. She resigned and filed an ethics complaint, the culprits had to resign and one paid a fine. I recognise that this actually helped her image as a reformer-- my point is that it's going to be easy for others to claim she doesn't finish things and can't be trusted to finish them.

(I'm not talking about truth here. but the spin: "quitter")

587 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:54:25pm

re: #580 iceweasel
Those running against her might bring that up. sure..question is, will that be brought up before or after her children, her lifestyle, and her looks this time?

588 NoWhereAlaska  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:55:14pm

re: #538 Altermite

She ran as an independent in Alaska, IIRC.

No, she ran as a republican. Granted as a non-traditional, anti-statist republican. She was supported by former Gov. Hickel. Gov. Murkowski was doomed because he acted as if he was in Washington D.C., instead of Juneau.
Her husband apparently was part of the Alaska Independence Party for awhile. But then a lot of us supported the AIP, when Hickel was running as an AIP candidate against two liberals. (Not because of some desire to declare independence from the U.S.--although given what Obama is dishing out that idea may increase the ranks of the AIP in the near future.)

589 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:56:50pm

re: #586 iceweasel
If she doesnt run for President then quitter might apply//yet after McCain and the liberal spoin machine, I think she is digging in her heels and fighting back...

About as refreshing a stance as any politician anywhere. I think we already know she would have been far better for this country than Obama has been. Far Ballsier, too.

590 Baelzar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:56:58pm

re: #507 Walter L. Newton

I find most only label it improper when it's their side being attacked.

I, too, wish a libertarian/conservative would emerge who wasn't afraid to bloody their knuckles on the libs. Instead we have mealy-mouthed pasty white gasbags who couldn't scare a mouse.

591 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:57:49pm

re: #584 Ojoe

She should quit the GOP as well.

Most people now despise both parties.

I'm going to suggest that's because the nation is increasingly ruled by a class of professional politicians - people who have never, ever done anything in their lives but run for and hold public office, who have no connection whatsoever to the common man and his concerns. Look around the House and the Senate - both are brimming with multi-millionaires; many of them come from nascent political dynasties whose involvement in politics spans generations; and a decreasing number of them have ever held jobs outside politics.

It is a recipe for both disenchantment and disaster.

A return to the Founder's vision - of a government run by people who took a leave from their ordinary pursuits to guide the country for a short time, who would then return to their former lives enriched by the experience and the country made richer by their contribution - is long overdue.

592 austin_blue  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:58:25pm

re: #585 quiet man

Yes, she did that last year and her approval rating fell from 80 to 50

Is that running around really better than quitting her lame duck status, making a mint on her book, and galvanizing the republican base when we are so hurting on leadership?

But she wasn't a lame duck. She wasn't term limited during her first term. She had a deal with the people of Alaska: "Vote me in as your governor and I will give you four- maybe more if you want to keep me- years of my time." I just think this will be spun in *so* many negative ways. There may be a *personal* upside to this, but it's a tough move politically.

593 Taqyia2Me  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:58:26pm

re: #531 iceweasel

Actually, Trig was a target and would have been one regardless of his condition. There were tons of rumours about who his 'real' mother was; Andrew Sullivan in particular was completely shameless about flogging that right up til the election. I can't stand Sully-- but remember this is a guy blogging for the Atlantic! not just some random diarist on dKos.

Also, when people weren't doubting Palin was his mother, they were saying she must be an uncaring mother because of the circumstances of his birth (she flew back to AK to have him.) That makes no sense either: the woman already had 4 children, of course she wanted to be with the doctors and hospitals and ob/gyns she'd used before. It was no one's damn business but hers, yet everyone felt entitled to judge her on it.

Finally, when people weren't pushing either of the above smears, they were oh-so-piously wondering if she could be a good parent to Trig and a VP-- NOT a question that would ever have been asked of a male candidate.

I wasn't a Palin fan, but there is no doubt in my mind that she was subjected to unfair attacks, many of them sexist, and many of them involving Trig.

Funny how I never heard any apologies from any of those accusing Trig of being mothered by the child who was, in reality, pregnant with a child of her own that was NOT Trig.
I'm with Walter. The left (and the rino right) is the enemy and they need to be called out for their bullshit.

594 NoWhereAlaska  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:58:38pm

re: #580 iceweasel

Another problem: Palin


Exactly.
Palin resigned from her last statewide office -- chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.

And she went to the media with her condemnation of the how things were run. She shook them up and won! It is part her appeal, as a non-traditional, go after the corruption, type of fighter.

595 BigJohn  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 3:59:23pm

re: #579 Grand Poobah

Huckabee is a nut. Never trust pastors turned politicians. Or politicians from Arkansas (Clinton is from Arkansas).

Clinton and Huck are even from the same town, Hope, AR. Must be the water.

596 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:00:01pm

re: #592 austin_blue

If she thought like that, too scared to face a label, then I hope she doesnt run..if she is going for broke, then I cant wait to vote for her, labeled by liberals or not.

597 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:00:33pm

re: #583 ShanghaiEd

I agree. I consider myself fairly jaded where reading blog abuse is concerned, but the combination of misogyny and racism in the abuse of Michelle Obama in some blogs is by far the ugliest I've seen. And it's not just from the White Supremacist crowd.

Yes, I agree. I think when you mock anyone's physical appearance, it's juvenile and immature. Michelle Obama has much to criticize, but none of it has to do with her skin color, her looks or her fashion sense.

I would add, however, we haven't seen the kind of criticism of Michelle (or Barack) Obama in the late night talk shows and the like, as we've seen with Palin and virtually her entire family. I'm not a huge fan of Palin as a Presidential candidate, but the comments and caricatures that have been painted about her and her family are well beyond the pale or any minimal sense of decency.

598 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:01:13pm

re: #593 Taqyia2Me

Funny how I never heard any apologies from any of those accusing Trig of being mothered by the child who was, in reality, pregnant with a child of her own that was NOT Trig.
I'm with Walter. The left (and the rino right) is the enemy and they need to be called out for their bullshit.


At the risk of opening a bottle of worms...
which RINOs? Are we talking Arlen Spencer, who isn't even an R IN anymore? Or McCain, because he won't unanimously condemn everyone hated by someone in the GOP?

599 Altermite  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:02:30pm

Can.

Going to log off and ease off on celebrating now.

Happy 4th.

600 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:02:36pm

re: #597 JarHeadLifer
And yet those comments continue long after she went back to Alaska.

Ask yourself why the libs require her to be not just defeated, but ripped apart.
I'll say why: she scares them by being real, unlike any of their women or men for that matter.

601 BigJohn  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:03:01pm

re: #573 Altermite

I don't have a problem with it. She still has a huge base. As they say, 2012 is an eternity in politics. I think she should announce she is running for President right now. We need her and Newt leading the conservative charge.

602 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:03:11pm

re: #594 NoWhereAlaska

And she went to the media with her condemnation of the how things were run. She shook them up and won! It is part her appeal, as a non-traditional, go after the corruption, type of fighter.

Yes, as stated, I know this helped her image as a reformer in AK. But nationally, in a campaign, it will be used to portray her as a quitter. The TV soundbite writes itself.

BTW, I think this is similar to her ties to the AIP. I'm aware that in AK it's not a big deal at all, and even has a long tradition (at least according to the one Alaskan I know, and the AK blogs I read). Elsewhere though, people hear about the AIP and don't like it.

603 RexMundi  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:05:22pm

Shooting star? More like that Earth-killer asteroid that's supposed to be here in 2012.

(Disclaimer: No I do not believe in all of that 'end of the world Mayan calendar' BS...but then again, I don't believe that Sarah Palin is anything other than a glorified pageant contestant, either.)

604 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:07:54pm

re: #603 RexMundi

She has shown herself to be a capable speaker and leader with far more experience and sense than Obama has shown.

605 SixDegrees  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:09:57pm

re: #600 quiet man

And yet those comments continue long after she went back to Alaska.

Ask yourself why the libs require her to be not just defeated, but ripped apart.
I'll say why: she scares them by being real, unlike any of their women or men for that matter.

For what it's worth, she never "went back to Alaska." She has sought out a high national profile ever since the election, appearing at numerous national Republican and Conservative gatherings. Just last month, a number of trial balloons were floated, releasing the gossip that she was considering a Presidential run. I have no idea where they originated, but she never denied them, and never declined to appear in the national spotlight.

Michael Jackson flat out died over a week ago, and people are still talking about him as though her were alive. If you seek out attention, you'll get it.

606 Taqyia2Me  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:12:05pm

re: #598 Altermite

At the risk of opening a bottle of worms...
which RINOs? Are we talking Arlen Spencer, who isn't even an R IN anymore? Or McCain, because he won't unanimously condemn everyone hated by someone in the GOP?

Snow and Collins most surely. And those 8 who voted for Crap and Taze.

607 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:12:39pm

re: #605 SixDegrees

I don't see that as true...
If she has sought out attention so much that you feel she never went back, where is her paper trail of taking on the huge issues Obama has placed us under?

All governor speak at rallies and gatherings..its part oif the job representing her state.

608 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:14:18pm

re: #606 Taqyia2Me

I am sure Powell will not have kind words for her either.

The big tent republicans who think we need someone more liberal than McCain fit the bill.

609 Tamron  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:16:15pm

re: #456 NelsFree

re: #444 iceweasel
Chelsea definitely got some harsh treatment--
I'd like an example of that, with fries and a Coke, please.


Dunno if this is 'harsh treatment', or just a fact:

Chelsea Clinton certainly bears a STRONG RESEMBLANCE to Webb Hubbell. (Scroll down a bit, to the morphing photos.)
.

610 Baelzar  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:17:13pm

I, too, would like a definition of "moderate republican" as slandered by Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, et al.

611 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:19:29pm

re: #610 Baelzar


I think he has been clear about that in the past..Rush has pointed out that these are the ones who usually side with democrats, stand for very little of the republican platform and who scream we need more moderate republican leaders, then when they put one up, applaudes and votes for the democrat

612 quiet man  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:24:39pm

BBQ time for me.

have fun lizards!

613 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:27:09pm

re: #597 JarHeadLifer


I would add, however, we haven't seen the kind of criticism of Michelle (or Barack) Obama in the late night talk shows and the like, as we've seen with Palin and virtually her entire family. I'm not a huge fan of Palin as a Presidential candidate, but the comments and caricatures that have been painted about her and her family are well beyond the pale or any minimal sense of decency.

In fairness, Palin's extended family did her no favors during the campaign. Can you picture the relatives of a black candidate being involved in a drug arrest, robbery, and juvenile delinquency, in addition to having an unmarried mother in the family?

For a politician pushing family values and dividing Americans into "real" and "other," it was a perfect storm of the kind of personal crap every politician's opponents look for and make the most of. I think it's a fantasy to assume that Palin's base would have been any less vicious if the shoe had been on the other foot. But, that's just me.

614 Roger  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:31:16pm

re: #590 Baelzar

I find most only label it improper when it's their side being attacked.

I, too, wish a libertarian/conservative would emerge who wasn't afraid to bloody their knuckles on the libs. Instead we have mealy-mouthed pasty white gasbags who couldn't scare a mousemoose.

Just a little editorial cosmetic

615 Tamron  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:38:26pm

re: #591 SixDegrees

A return to the Founder's vision - of a government run by people who took a leave from their ordinary pursuits to guide the country for a short time, who would then return to their former lives enriched by the experience and the country made richer by their contribution - is long overdue.


True. And don't forget, those original public servants FREELY DONATED THEIR TIME to unpaid public service, because it was the patriotic thing to do. (Try telling that to Nancy Pelosi, as she commutes in that big passenger jet back home to California every weekend, at the taxpayer's expense of more than $5 million/year.)

CHANGE!
.

616 swamprat  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:41:27pm

No shortage of alcohol on a holiday, eh?

Play nice.

617 jvic  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:49:10pm

re: #495 iceweasel

re: #480 NelsFree

Dear Ice,
...
Now, please find me one article that shows "harsh treatment" of Chelsea Clinton.

Love,
NelsFree
PS I don't want your brain now.

You asked for examples of Chelsea being treated harshly. I provided them. Now you want to change the subject and talk about whether people were chastised for it.

We're done. Have a great fourth!

Wow. Ice, I'm not discarding the brain I've got, but if you offer a lease or dual boot option...

618 Tamron  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:52:08pm

re: #613 ShanghaiEd

In fairness, Palin's extended family did her no favors during the campaign. Can you picture the relatives of a black candidate being involved in a drug arrest, robbery, and juvenile delinquency, in addition to having an unmarried mother in the family?


Uh, how's about the associates (William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn) of a black candidate being involved in acts of terrorism, rape and murder, but that certainly didn't get national headlines.

We needn't even bother to mention that same black candidate's cousin Odinga's questionable political shenanigans in Kenya, which also didn't get into the local news.

It's a decidedly one-way smear, I tells ya.
.

619 1 US Sheeple  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:56:55pm

For those that think Palin is quitting, consider that if she stayed as Governor she would have a much easier road to her candidacy for Pres. She took the principled approach which is found infrequently in the world of present day politics. That is why hardly anyone can understand what she is doing.
I think the reason that she is so maligned by the elites of the RINO party is because she has something that has disappeared: ETHICS! In addition, she has come up as virtually an independent and has not come up within the ranks of the RINO party. Her job prior to being governor was as a mayor.
She reminds me of Reagan and her speeches reflect a lot of Reagan's ideas and principals. Those of you who follow the RINO party line might want to consider someone who has principals and ethics before you condemn her further.

620 SteveRogers  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 4:57:53pm

"Rollins contended that, ”She diminished the job of governor. I think, at the end of the day, I’ve been in the business four decades, I’ve never seen a governor ever walk away from the job at mid-term, and I think, at the end of the day, that’s what’s gonna affect affect her."

No, at the end of the day, Sarah Palin considers her family more important than politics. She wants to protect them from some of the most dirty politics in our history, what with politicians, the MSM and the "elite" of Hollywood salivating to target her children.

And at the end of the day, she knows that the Lt Gov can help the people of Alaska more than she can at this point, not being hamstrung by the media, the left, and the "good 'ol boys career bureaurats" of the GOP, who not only have wanted her to fail but have done everything they can to make sure she failed.

And people wonder why we don't have more decent folks running for office?
Now I have more respect for Palin, because she realizes what is most important in life.

Most of the pundits and politicians on the right and on the left don't get it, because they can't comprehend why anyone would walk away from all that power and potential power. They are too used to dealing with the greedy status quo to ever realize that some people really do want what's best for their families, friends and fellow citizens and really aren't out to screw people over for their own gain.
And that's why they can't understand the average joe or jane.

621 Walter E. Wallis  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:01:46pm

Her major accomplishment will help warm the middle states for generations. Name another contender from either party who has left anything but debt.

622 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:03:14pm

re: #618 Tamron

Uh, how's about the associates (William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn) of a black candidate being involved in acts of terrorism, rape and murder, but that certainly didn't get national headlines.

We needn't even bother to mention that same black candidate's cousin Odinga's questionable political shenanigans in Kenya, which also didn't get into the local news.

It's a decidedly one-way smear, I tells ya.
.

"Relatives," "associates," two completely different things. And if a questionable cousin is the worst of somebody's problems, they're in pretty good shape.

What I'm asking is for you to picture the exact scenario of Palin's family, playing out on Obama's side, and him still having a career left afterward. The racists would have celebrated for years and years. Seriously.

623 hershel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:10:54pm

OK, so maybe Palin in the end was just a lightweight in over her head. The criticisms of her by NRO's Jonah Goldberg were not RINO snark, they were well-meaning and I actually agree with much of it.

But here's the thing - has any politician, ever, been subjected to the savagery unleashed upon not only Palin but her family? One of the biggest outrages of the 2008 campaign was that the American public learned more about Trig and Bristol Palin than about BO's political background as a frontman for the Daley machine.

From the beginning of the primaries through the election it was a given that Republicans had a steep uphill battle because of the unpopularity of the Bush administration. There was a moment that this was no longer true - when McCain chose Palin as his running mate. It is difficult to shake the feeling that she was targeted for personal destruction because of her game-changing charisma and because a fair and honest "vetting" of her shortcomings would have required exposing BO as the shallow machine-pol hustler lacking any accomplishment that he really was.

624 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:14:51pm

re: #617 jvic

Wow. Ice, I'm not discarding the brain I've got, but if you offer a lease or dual boot option...

Now *you* I'd share with, if I can share yours too. :)

625 SteveRogers  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:15:10pm

re: #622 ShanghaiEd

"Relatives," "associates," two completely different things. And if a questionable cousin is the worst of somebody's problems, they're in pretty good shape.

What I'm asking is for you to picture the exact scenario of Palin's family, playing out on Obama's side, and him still having a career left afterward. The racists would have celebrated for years and years. Seriously.

Are you joking? The MSM (with the exception of a very few reporters) covered for or downplayed everything negative about Obama. At this point there's really no reason for the MSM in general to pretend. They are the best PR agents Obama could possibly have. Many fall all over themselves to practically worship the guy.

626 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:17:37pm

re: #620 SteveRogers

"Rollins contended that, ”She diminished the job of governor. I think, at the end of the day, I’ve been in the business four decades, I’ve never seen a governor ever walk away from the job at mid-term, and I think, at the end of the day, that’s what’s gonna affect affect her."

No, at the end of the day, Sarah Palin considers her family more important than politics. She wants to protect them from some of the most dirty politics in our history, what with politicians, the MSM and the "elite" of Hollywood salivating to target her children...(snip)

...Most of the pundits and politicians on the right and on the left don't get it, because they can't comprehend why anyone would walk away from all that power and potential power. They are too used to dealing with the greedy status quo to ever realize that some people really do want what's best for their families, friends and fellow citizens and really aren't out to screw people over for their own gain.

Then, I presume that you don't believe she either should or will run for the Presidency? Whatever hardships her family has come under (and I don't doubt for an instance that they have), those hardships will only increase exponentially if she runs in '12.

I think that is what the pundits are so puzzled about. If she had come out and said directly, "I'm walking away from public and political life for the foreseeable future", then I don't think anyone would have been to puzzled as to her motivations. But, she didn't say that. In fact, she's left the door quite open to the possibility that she's abandoning her present job to focus on her next one - some three and half years away. That is what's puzzling.

627 hershel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:18:28pm

"What I'm asking is for you to picture the exact scenario of Palin's family, playing out on Obama's side"

Try picturing this - a Republican politician with zero accomplishments in his adult life, his career consisting mostly of a desultory turn as a state legislator fronting for a political machine, elevated to the Senate for a couple of years because his opponent "conveniently" became mired in scandal. And then this Republican politician being hailed and fawned over by the press as the national savior, if not Savior. Can you picture it? I can't.

628 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:29:31pm

re: #625 SteveRogers

Are you joking? The MSM (with the exception of a very few reporters) covered for or downplayed everything negative about Obama. At this point there's really no reason for the MSM in general to pretend. They are the best PR agents Obama could possibly have. Many fall all over themselves to practically worship the guy.

That doesn't change my point. "Negatives" were brought up on every politician in the 2008 race. It's just that none of them rose to the tabloid-prescribed level of family lawbreaking and pregnancy. Except for Huckabee's son torturing the dog, and he was a juvenile at the time, so that pretty much went by the wayside.

Not saying the tabloid standards are fair or correct, but I feel certain that lawbreaking or pregnancy in the family of any candidate would have created a shitstorm in the tabloids or talk shows. Political preferences aside, they're certainly not principled enough to pass over that sort of revenue.

629 SteveRogers  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:35:22pm

re: #626 JarHeadLifer

No, I don't believe she will run. She may help other conservatives/classical liberals with fundraisers or stumping, and do some behind the scenes stuff, but I would be shocked if she ever ran for President.

630 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:36:52pm

re: #627 hershel

"What I'm asking is for you to picture the exact scenario of Palin's family, playing out on Obama's side"

Try picturing this - a Republican politician with zero accomplishments in his adult life, his career consisting mostly of a desultory turn as a state legislator fronting for a political machine, elevated to the Senate for a couple of years because his opponent "conveniently" became mired in scandal. And then this Republican politician being hailed and fawned over by the press as the national savior, if not Savior. Can you picture it? I can't.


Politicians with minimal accomplishments have been elected in the past, and in part because of opponents' scandals. Would never have happened on the Republican side in 2008, though, because of the country's generally negative mood toward the GOP. So, no...I can't picture your scenario.

Doesn't change the point I'm making...my scenario would never have happened, either. Strictly because of the racial aspect, if nothing else. Do you disagree?

631 Promethea  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:37:43pm

I hope some of you have seen the article on Sarah Palin in the new issue of Runner's World. It shows what an amazing talent this woman is. She has determination and stamina and goes out in terrible weather to run long distances.

Normally I don't pay much attention to athletes, but this article showed me another side of her character that ought to be praised by anti-idiotarians.

632 SteveRogers  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 5:42:48pm

re: #628 ShanghaiEd

Not on Oprah, lol. For one thing, there hasn't been much investigating going on into Obama's past. Hell, we don't even know his GPA while he attended college, let alone any papers he did.
Virtually everything I have read about Obama's immediate family has come from him.

As for his "associates" it's not surprising that he and the media now use that word to describe Obama's spiritual advisor or friends. :)

633 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:07:25pm

re: #632 SteveRogers

For one thing, there hasn't been much investigating going on into Obama's past. Hell, we don't even know his GPA while he attended college, let alone any papers he did. Virtually everything I have read about Obama's immediate family has come from him.

Hmmm. I think you greatly underestimate the "oppo research" capabilities of modern political parties. Both have huge, well-funded squads of people who scour the public record (and to the extent they can, the private record) for any and all dirt on the competition. Neither side is squeamish about bringing up dirt. It either sticks in the public mind or it doesn't, but that sure doesn't prevent them bringing it up.

Do you really think any of the candidates could have covered up a criminal record or an out-of-wedlock child? Not in this day and age.

634 kynna  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:17:57pm

re: #628 ShanghaiEd

That doesn't change my point. "Negatives" were brought up on every politician in the 2008 race. It's just that none of them rose to the tabloid-prescribed level of family lawbreaking and pregnancy. Except for Huckabee's son torturing the dog, and he was a juvenile at the time, so that pretty much went by the wayside.

Not saying the tabloid standards are fair or correct, but I feel certain that lawbreaking or pregnancy in the family of any candidate would have created a shitstorm in the tabloids or talk shows. Political preferences aside, they're certainly not principled enough to pass over that sort of revenue.

Obama's brother lives in a shack in Kenya, his "beloved" auntie is an illegal and lives on welfare, he has multiple illegitimate siblings, while it may not be his family, he acquired his home with the help of a drug dealer ... tabloids could have had a field day with Obama, as could the MSM. They chose not to.

635 SteveRogers  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:24:50pm

re: #633 ShanghaiEd

Hmmm. I think you greatly underestimate the "oppo research" capabilities of modern political parties. Both have huge, well-funded squads of people who scour the public record (and to the extent they can, the private record) for any and all dirt on the competition. Neither side is squeamish about bringing up dirt. It either sticks in the public mind or it doesn't, but that sure doesn't prevent them bringing it up.

Do you really think any of the candidates could have covered up a criminal record or an out-of-wedlock child? Not in this day and age.

I'm talking about the MSM which dwarfs the resources of the "oppo research" capabilities of modern political parties.
I mean really, not one thing is uncovered from his college transcripts? It's hard to believe reporters couldn't find one professor or fellow student to talk.

As for cover-ups, how about John Edwards? Even Fox news witheld info about that affair.
The Enquirer broke that story but it was only confirmed by the MSM over a year afterwards. Why the cover-up?
And that was an easy one. With the MSM it ain't about the truth it's about perception. Cover-ups are probably more common than we might think, unfortunately.

636 ~Fianna  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:30:46pm

re: #380 haakondahl

You know, I'd like to get iceweasel or avanti's take on the treatment of POTUS-affiliated children in the media. Amy smoked dope IN THE WHITE HOUSE, which was duly noted and briefly scandalous. Chelsea was savaged by perhaps three people, and just once per. The Bush girls were roughed up on a fairly regular basis, but usually no cause for outrage--just anger. Sarah Palin's children have been cleaned and filleted in the media. President Obama might as well not have children for all the media says, which is good.

Just thinking out loud, but I can't think of anything like it.

The Clintons specifically asked the media to leave Chelsea out of it. It was more or less respected by everyone but Limbaugh, who made a lot of nasty cracks, including calling her the "White House dog" when she was something like 13 or 14.

The Bush girls had a lot of cracks made about them, but not by the "media" - more by comedians and late-night hosts.

The Obamas don't take their kids out on publicity tours much, which might be one difference.

Palin made her kids part of her campaign, which made the family and the family issues targets for the media. She was also fairly late to the party in terms of complaining about it. The first mention she seems to have made about media treatment of her kids is January of 09 from what I could google up.

637 iceweasel  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:33:50pm

re: #633 ShanghaiEd

Hmmm. I think you greatly underestimate the "oppo research" capabilities of modern political parties. Both have huge, well-funded squads of people who scour the public record (and to the extent they can, the private record) for any and all dirt on the competition. Neither side is squeamish about bringing up dirt. It either sticks in the public mind or it doesn't, but that sure doesn't prevent them bringing it up.

Do you really think any of the candidates could have covered up a criminal record or an out-of-wedlock child? Not in this day and age.

Also, does anyone imagine Clinton's oppo research wouldn't have found everything possible and deployed it?

638 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:33:50pm

re: #634 kynna

Obama's brother lives in a shack in Kenya, his "beloved" auntie is an illegal and lives on welfare, he has multiple illegitimate siblings, while it may not be his family, he acquired his home with the help of a drug dealer ... tabloids could have had a field day with Obama, as could the MSM. They chose not to.

So how did you find out about this info, if it wasn't covered in the media?

As far as I know, all this was common knowledge. Why did none of it "catch on" with the public, do you think?

639 JarHeadLifer  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:40:51pm

re: #216 swamprat

And that speaks worlds
who molds peoples opinions?
and why?

Yes, that's right. I'm not defending why people felt the way they did about Palin vs. Biden. But, at the same time, I'm intelligent enough not to try and pretend that they didn't feel the way they did, and in the numbers that they did.

The media was in the tank for Barry. Whomever writes off or dismisses the MSM as a dying industry, does so at their own peril. The traditional media is now just as strong, and even more ubiquitous than at any other time in our history.

640 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:51:08pm

re: #635 SteveRogers

I'm talking about the MSM which dwarfs the resources of the "oppo research" capabilities of modern political parties.
I mean really, not one thing is uncovered from his college transcripts? It's hard to believe reporters couldn't find one professor or fellow student to talk.

As for cover-ups, how about John Edwards? Even Fox news witheld info about that affair.
The Enquirer broke that story but it was only confirmed by the MSM over a year afterwards. Why the cover-up?
And that was an easy one. With the MSM it ain't about the truth it's about perception. Cover-ups are probably more common than we might think, unfortunately.

1. I think you over-estimate the media's investigative resources. They've been cut to the bare minimum in the years since Watergate, and eliminated entirely in some cases. The vast majority get their "tips" from somebody with an axe to grind, e.g. oppo researchers and public relations pros.

2. What does a candidate gain by releasing his/her college transcripts? Why didn't McCain, Palin, Huckabee, Romney, et al release theirs? As for professors gossiping about students, aren't they limited by professional confidentiality?

3. I don't buy a cover-up conspiracy. Why did Fox withhold info on Edwards, do you think, other than waiting for the hard proof the tabloid finally got?

641 ~Fianna  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:57:06pm

re: #536 redc1c4

cover everyone, or cover no one. apply the policy equally for all, or admit you have a bias.

since the MFM insists that the extended family members of all conservatives are open season, it's only fair that the policy extend the other way too. after all, Ear Leader is all about "fair".

the other option is to dial back coverage to *only* the candidate themselves, and their positions, but the MFM can't do that and still support their goals.

One question I have on that is if you make your family and "family values" in general the platform, doesn't that mean people are going to be interested in your family?

I think the Trig stuff was WAY out of line. He certainly didn't give himself a malformed chromosome, and nothing that either parent did or didn't do caused or could have prevented Trig's problems. But Bristol's pregnancy might be a different matter, no?

Other than Sullivan's crap (and that's all it is and why he has readership or even a place to post his garbage other than MySpace), I don't recall "the media" making cracks about Trig. Maybe I just missed it, since I don't own a TV nor do I read any blogs other than this one. But from what I recall that was currant in the blogosphere, and the internet isn't widely known as a source of decorum and intellectual discourse in general. There's no one that can fire or discipline a blogger other than her or his readership. Did those types of comments make it out of the blogs other than the media covering what the blogs were saying? If so, they should have been treated the same way just about everyone other than Limbaugh was treated over cracks about Chelsea.

642 Bear  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 6:58:01pm

re: fianna #636
Rush Linbaugh did not call Chelsea the White House Dog. That was some person in the studio and Rush promptly fired that person.

643 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:08:37pm

re: #642 Bear

re: fianna #636
Rush Linbaugh did not call Chelsea the White House Dog. That was some person in the studio and Rush promptly fired that person.


Bear: Link to that, please?

This incident happened on Limbaugh's TV show in 1993. He put up a photo of the Clintons' cat and said "White House cat," then put up a photo of Chelsea Clinton and said "White House dog."

Who was this "other person" in the studio, how did they get the microphone away from the host, and when were they fired? I've never heard that story before.

644 Bear  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:15:36pm

Did they have either Buddy or Socks then?

645 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:17:21pm

re: #644 Bear

Did they have either Buddy or Socks then?

Socks was the photo that Limbaugh held up when he said "White House cat."

How is this relevant to what we're talking about?

646 Bear  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:23:02pm

Beats me. Though my memory of the event was that he personaly did not pick up the picture, it was one of the workers, perhaps the producer.

647 ~Fianna  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:25:24pm

re: #642 Bear

re: fianna #636
Rush Linbaugh did not call Chelsea the White House Dog. That was some person in the studio and Rush promptly fired that person.

Cite for that please, since I can't find it anywhere.

Also, why not just edit it out of the show rather than blame anyone? I can't find any quotes at all from Limbaugh on the issue. Why hasn't he refuted the issue?

648 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:26:45pm

re: #646 Bear

Beats me. Though my memory of the event was that he personaly did not pick up the picture, it was one of the workers, perhaps the producer.

Hey, I'm not that naive. What does it matter who picked up the picture, if Limbaugh made the joke? Why would he have shown pictures of White House pets if there were no joke involved?

You said another person made the joke, and that person got fired. Do you have a reference for that? Or did you only hear it second-hand?

649 Bear  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:32:01pm

Sorry if my memory failed.

650 gatorbait  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 7:39:02pm

I wonder if Sarah did not simply pull the rug out from under the feet of her various detractors. She certainly got everybody's attention. Her next move? Who knows, but don't count her out yet. She might just pull something off, in the next three years, that no one would ever expect. I sure hope so.

651 jvic  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 8:01:21pm

re: #649 Bear

Sorry if my memory failed.

An upding for being reasonable.

The best defense of Limbaugh I've found is here. It seems dubious to me but not impossible. After my haphazard googling, I'll call Limbaugh guilty by preponderance of evidence, but not beyond a reasonable doubt.

652 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 8:14:40pm

re: #651 jvic

An upding for being reasonable.

The best defense of Limbaugh I've found is here. It seems dubious to me but not impossible. After my haphazard googling, I'll call Limbaugh guilty by preponderance of evidence, but not beyond a reasonable doubt.

Thanks for the link. Very interesting.

What seems dubious to me is that the blogger is apparently referring to a videotape and/or transcript of the Limbaugh show in question, but there is no link to either the video or the transcript. Wonder why? If he/she has the evidence to put this story to rest once and for all, why not do so?

653 ~Fianna  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 8:17:16pm

re: #651 jvic

An upding for being reasonable.

The best defense of Limbaugh I've found is here. It seems dubious to me but not impossible. After my haphazard googling, I'll call Limbaugh guilty by preponderance of evidence, but not beyond a reasonable doubt.

I've seen that, too. I couldn't find anything anywhere else that's backed it up, but I've seen lots of cites of the incident itself.

I wish I could find the original clip on YouTube or elsewhere so that I could judge for myself what happened, but no luck. I've tried both YouTube and just a general Google video search so that I could link it.

weird to think that there used to be a whole world that WASN'T up on the internet in 2 minutes! :)

654 jvic  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 8:27:39pm

re: #624 iceweasel

Now *you* I'd share with, if I can share yours too. :)

Start an online commonplace book, blog, or the like, and you can count on me as a commenter. :-)

655 jvic  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 9:00:03pm

From Palin's Facebook page (HT: commenter Susan at The Secular Right):

...
The response in the main stream media has been most predictable, ironic, and as always, detached from the lives of ordinary Americans who are sick of the “politics of personal destruction”. How sad that Washington and the media will never understand; it’s about country. And though it's honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher calling and without finishing a term, of course we know by now, for some reason a different standard applies for the decisions I make. But every American understands what it takes to make a decision because it’s right for all, including your family.

I shared with you yesterday my heartfelt and candid reasons for this change; I’ve never thought I needed a title before one’s name to forge progress in America. I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this country together with our values of less government intervention, greater energy independence, stronger national security, and much-needed fiscal restraint. I hope you will join me. Now is the time to rebuild and help our nation achieve greatness!

God bless you! And I look forward to making a difference – with you!

Sarah

Whaaat...?

She's keeping my attention, I'll give her that.

But if she expects some of my money, she is very very likely mistaken.

656 Westward Ho  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 9:29:05pm

re: #96 capitalist piglet

Name one whose underage daughter was the punchline of a sex joke on national fucking television.

I remember Rush comparing Chelsea clinton's looks to a dog.

657 ShanghaiEd  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 9:37:50pm

re: #656 Westward Ho

I remember Rush comparing Chelsea clinton's looks to a dog.

There's also John McCain's joke about Chelsea: "Why is Chelsea so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno." He made the joke to a live audience, not on TV, but once it was reported widely, he apologized personally to Bill and Hillary.

658 NukeAtomrod  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 9:45:32pm

We won't know if this was a good or bad move for Palin until we see her next move. Maybe she's a better chess player than she's given credit for.

659 mcaplan6102  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 10:07:56pm

It still amazes me that anyone could possibly vote for Sarah Palin after she is exposed as a know-nothing by Katie Couric. I suppose many Republicans would vote for their pet rock. What more proof does one need that she is a clown? Haven't the Republicans learned their lesson by electing someone who spent most of their life proving that they are a failure and an idiot (Bush) with the hope that the person can surround themselves with non-elected advisors? Come on! Sarah Palin? What a joke. Why not just end the Republican party. Go read her statement on Facebook. It is the most rambling non-sensical statement I've read in a long time. She uses random exclamation points similar to my 8 year old daughter. Unbelievable that anyone can actually care about this person.

660 mcaplan6102  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 10:14:20pm

"Name one whose underage daughter was the punchline of a sex joke on national fucking television.

Help me out here.

I'll tell you what's bullshit. Acting like this is equivalent to what any Democrat has gone through."

I know your sense of history might only be a few months old, but McCain called Chelsea Clinton ugly. Palin's daughter did get pregnant -- Letterman's stupid writer got the 2 daughters mixed up, that is all. If you get pregnant at 18, and your mother is out there in politics discussing similar issues, expect a few jokes hurled your way.

661 kansas  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 10:38:47pm

[Link: conservatives4palin.googlegroups.com...]

Looks like Palin is going to come out swinging.

662 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 10:42:01pm

re: #641 ~Fianna


Other than Sullivan's crap (and that's all it is and why he has readership or even a place to post his garbage other than MySpace), I don't recall "the media" making cracks about Trig. Maybe I just missed it, since I don't own a TV nor do I read any blogs other than this one. But from what I recall that was currant in the blogosphere, and the internet isn't widely known as a source of decorum and intellectual discourse in general. There's no one that can fire or discipline a blogger other than her or his readership. Did those types of comments make it out of the blogs other than the media covering what the blogs were saying? If so, they should have been treated the same way just about everyone other than Limbaugh was treated over cracks about Chelsea.

I don't recall a mean word about Trig from anyone except Sullivan. I could be wrong, but I can't think of an example. And Sullivan, to be clear, was actually attacking the adolescents and grown-ups in the family, rather than Trig himself. Disgusting, but I guess slightly less disgusting than actually being mean to a child who can't talk yet.

663 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 10:43:44pm

re: #642 Bear

re: fianna #636
Rush Linbaugh did not call Chelsea the White House Dog. That was some person in the studio and Rush promptly fired that person.

No, Rush said there was a White House dog, IIRC, and then claimed that someone else put up the picture of CHelsea without his permission. I do not buy it.

664 dapperdave  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:06:27pm

Aahhh, all the food and fireworks have wrapped another wonderful 4th, I hope rest of the lizard world has had an awesome day as well. I can't wait to see what Palin is going to do next, I really think she's going to come out swinging, no longer tied down to Alaska the barracuda is on the lose, this is going to get very interesting indeed.

665 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:21:38pm

re: #576 SixDegrees

The problem is simple - if she quit because she couldn't take the heat, she'll have that "Quitter" label tattooed on her forehead forever. Postulating Palin as President following 0bama, by which time the economy may very well be in a complete shambles and our foreign policy little more than a smoking crater, will put her in a position where criticism of her every action will be orders of magnitude worse than anything that's been thrown at her to date, and there will be much, much more of it. The question then becomes: will she quit, or will she stick around to finish the job?

That's assuming that the criticism was her reason for resigning. Although that's the explanation being circulated by her aides, it isn't clear to me yet that it's correct. I await further information. But politically, this is at least potentially an extremely damaging move, quite possibly a career ending move, it the reason offered is simply a thin skin.

Tattooed forever on her forehead? A big 'Q' for quitter, like the scarlet letter 'A' that Hester Prynne wore? I just clipped this from SparkNotes

By the novel's end, Hester has become a protofeminist mother figure to the women of the community. The shame attached to her scarlet letter is long gone. Women recognize that her punishment stemmed in part from the town fathers' sexism, and they come to Hester seeking shelter from the sexist forces under which they themselves suffer.

666 Clubsec  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:22:34pm

Let's see.
Rollins works for Huckabee.
Huckabee might entertain a run to replace the TOTUS in 2012.
Palin might be a stumbling block in that endeavor.
Ergo, Rollins disparages Palin.
Simple really.

667 Silvergirl  Sat, Jul 4, 2009 11:23:17pm

re: #661 kansas

[Link: conservatives4palin.googlegroups.com...]

Looks like Palin is going to come out swinging.

As she should.

668 capitalist piglet  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 12:01:40am

re: #656 Westward Ho

I remember Rush comparing Chelsea clinton's looks to a dog.

Me too, and he was an asshole for doing it. Get back to me when he jokes about an underage girl (one of the Obama girls, for instance) having sex with an adult.

And by the way, for those whose mind it has slipped, Biden has a troubled "kid" (who is old enough to be held up to scrutiny), but she was left alone.

There is no moral equivalence here. None.

669 ssn697  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 1:26:40am

re: #668 capitalist piglet

Except no one made a joke about sex with an underage girl, unless you really want people to believe Letterman was ignoring the glaring story of the older daughter already known to the entire nation, in favor of a joke about a daughter not even 5% of the country could name.

It is silly to claim what you are claiming.

670 haakondahl  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 2:14:17am

re: #528 Altermite

If you want to accuse me of being a sock puppet, then take some of Walter's advice. Stop pussyfooting around and do it.

I'm going to tell you that I am not. If you are terribly concerned, voice those concerns to someone who can verify that I am not a sockpuppet.

I don't think you're a sockpuppet. I think you've mastered the obvious.

671 Roger  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 4:01:12am

Speaking of Chelsea
[Link: gawker.com...]
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
She looks nice and she looks happy.

672 Roger  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 4:06:00am

On the scale of 1 to 10, where do you place the charisma of Ross Perot and the charisma of Sarah Palin?

673 RexMundi  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 5:59:52am

re: #604 quiet man

She has shown herself to be a capable speaker and leader with far more experience and sense than Obama has shown.

Sorry but I don't see how you can believe that if you and I watched the same interviews. You aren't going to convince me with that apologetic "She was nailed by the 'gotcha' media" stuff, either. If that is a 'capable speaker' to you, then, well...we'll agree to disagree.

And her speeches with her transparent winking and inflection, her major glorification of things like God and his plan, please, give me a break.

674 J.S.  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 6:20:14am

I have to say that on this occasion I'm in agreement with Ed Rollins. I think Sarah Palin should quit politics. (Might also note that "sticking it out" and "bailing out" are not "one and the same." And it doesn't work both ways. You don't leave office mid-term, then compliment yourself on your tenacity and "stick-with-it-ness." Unless, of course, you're only interested in becoming the brunt of jokes or providing the fodder for late-night comedians.)

675 Flyers1974  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 6:26:54am

re: #673 RexMundi

Sorry but I don't see how you can believe that if you and I watched the same interviews. You aren't going to convince me with that apologetic "She was nailed by the 'gotcha' media" stuff, either. If that is a 'capable speaker' to you, then, well...we'll agree to disagree.

And her speeches with her transparent winking and inflection, her major glorification of things like God and his plan, please, give me a break.

I think that many people became completely committed to Palin early on, and it is now psychologically very difficult for them to distance themselves from her. Once their level of committment to and belief in Palin, along with the accompaning media theories were stated, it would from then on be near impossible to admit all was an illusion and that she simply wasn't the next Reagan.

676 Flyers1974  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 6:32:59am

When Sarah Palin was first introduced, it appeared (to me at least) that she could be the next Reagan. Like a desperate MLB team forced to do something unconventional, did McCain take a risk on an unknown minor leauger and discover a gem? As a liberal, this was my concern. After a short period of time, it became apparent that though like Reagan, an outsider, she lacked his communication skills, his authenticity, his lack of pettiness, his understanding of the electorate outside the base, and his ability to destroy Democrats in elections.

677 Grand Poobah  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 8:31:58am

re: #676 Flyers1974

His "lack of pettiness?" When did Regan have such brutal attacks launched at his family, with no one seeming to care. If the press tried to pull these stunts 20 years ago, people would have turned on the press.

Now however, the msm has slowly realized that a Regan successor would be suicide for the grand left wing scheme of things. So they're out to butcher Palin. Who has held up remarkably well, I must say.

*Note* By "lack of pettiness" I assume you're addressing the speeches wherein Palin has addressed her detractors and enemies. Well, a lot of Regan's speeches were incendiary as well, he wasn't afraid to speak up, even against members of his own party.

678 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 9:47:02am

re: #677 Grand Poobah

His "lack of pettiness?" When did Regan have such brutal attacks launched at his family, with no one seeming to care. If the press tried to pull these stunts 20 years ago, people would have turned on the press.

Now however, the msm has slowly realized that a Regan successor would be suicide for the grand left wing scheme of things. So they're out to butcher Palin. Who has held up remarkably well, I must say.

*Note* By "lack of pettiness" I assume you're addressing the speeches wherein Palin has addressed her detractors and enemies. Well, a lot of Regan's speeches were incendiary as well, he wasn't afraid to speak up, even against members of his own party.

Nancy Reagan was mocked in the media, and the press jumped all over the kids when they started to criticize their parents. It was pretty ugly.

679 Flyers1974  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 10:08:29am

re: #677 Grand Poobah

No problem, strike "lack of pettiness" from my last.

680 scullymj  Sun, Jul 5, 2009 7:11:33pm

These failed political operatives like Mr. Rollins are simply out of touch with the Conservative base. Their 15 minutes was up long ago. Sarah Palin is the real deal, she is America.

681 Yashmak  Mon, Jul 6, 2009 7:26:07am
Their 15 minutes was up long ago.

At least they stayed on stage until their time was up. I cannot imagine this move working in her favor. It's more likely to just ratchet up the negative attention she's getting. To me, she's always seemed like an inadvertent parody of conservative stereotypes.


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Nobody would have the idea.


eBooks for Everyone at Barnes & Noble