RIP, Walter Cronkite
Forty years ago, he was covering the moon landing of Apollo 11. Tonight, veteran CBS journalist Walter Cronkite is dead at the age of 92, after a protracted illness.
Forty years ago, he was covering the moon landing of Apollo 11. Tonight, veteran CBS journalist Walter Cronkite is dead at the age of 92, after a protracted illness.
388 comments
2![]() |
Lee Coller Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:30:43pm |
He was also there during the Iran Hostage Crises, reminding Americans that 52 of our countrymen were being held in Iran.
3![]() |
IslandLibertarian Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:31:20pm |
"the most trusted man in America"...wasn't that his un-official title?
4![]() |
Charles Johnson Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:31:36pm |
re: #1 zombie
Charles, check the spelling -- isn't it "Cronkite" with a "C"?
Yes, I had a little brain fart there.
5![]() |
livefreeor die Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:31:43pm |
The news voice of my childhood.
RIP, Mr. Cronkite.
7![]() |
keeping it simple Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:32:02pm |
I remember him announcing the death of JFK. That's how old I am!
8![]() |
Lee Coller Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:32:26pm |
re: #6 Kosh's Shadow
And that's the way it is, July 20, 2009
Could you let me know the closing stock prices?
9![]() |
sngnsgt Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:32:57pm |
re: #5 livefreeor die
The news voice of my childhood.
RIP, Mr. Cronkite.
Nice post, I was trying to think of a way to say pretty much the same.
10![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:33:09pm |
Sad. I remember his coverage of the JFK assassination in '63, Tet offensive in '68, Apollo 11 in '69 and everything else until '81.
11![]() |
zombie Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:33:10pm |
Weird -- Charles brief misspelling of Cronkite as Kronkhite makes me realize that his name is likely a cognate of the German "krankheit"-- which means "illness" -- which he just succumbed to!
Cosmic, sorta.
12![]() |
IslandLibertarian Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:33:47pm |
re: #7 keeping it simple
the nuns played the radio in class for the rest of that day...6th grade...my first Cronk'...
13![]() |
Charles Johnson Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:33:55pm |
Most LGF readers don't need to be told this, but please note that any mean-spirited comments about Cronkite will be deleted. If you can't restrain yourself from venting anger, do it somewhere else.
14![]() |
3 wood Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:34:34pm |
Condolences to the family.
I have had many Nam Vet's tell me over the years that Cronkite was instrumental in helping the Viet Cong turn abject defeat into victory during the Tet Offensive with his editorializing on his broadcasts.
May he rest in peace.
15![]() |
Cannadian Club Akbar Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:34:54pm |
I grew up with many from the networks. Before I found out I was a better writer, I wanted to be them. I used to love Charles Kuralt. Soft music. Sunday morning. And shots from a Field.
16![]() |
Kosh's Shadow Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:35:03pm |
re: #8 Lee Coller
Could you let me know the closing stock prices?
Sorry, I was thinking of the lunar landing date, and didn't check any of the many calendars.
17![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:35:18pm |
re: #11 zombie
I was thinking the same thing. I learned that in high school German class.
18![]() |
tradewind Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:35:29pm |
re: #13 Charles
Thank you and amen...
We are not Huffpo or DU...
19![]() |
chedgeman Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:36:22pm |
re: #7 keeping it simple
You're not old - you just have a good memory. Now, my kid brother went to Woodstock - that's old!
20![]() |
wrenchwench Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:36:28pm |
We went to the neighbors' house to watch the moon landing because they had a color TV. Didn't really need color for that...
I fell asleep on the floor.
21![]() |
unrealizedviewpoint Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:36:30pm |
re: #13 Charles
Most LGF readers don't need to be told this, but please note that any mean-spirited comments about Cronkite will be deleted. If you can't restrain yourself from venting anger, do it somewhere else.
How does one hate Walter Cronkite? sheesh!
22![]() |
zombie Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:36:38pm |
My most vivid memory of Cronkite was on my eighth birthday.
After a rather disappointing brithday with no party, I was watching TV, and he said, "And that's the way it is, [month] [day, 19[year]." And suddenly, my birthday seemed "official" and I suddenly felt very special.
For that, he always held a place in my heart. (More than my $#&@#$% parents, actually. Imagine an eight-year-old with no party!)
23![]() |
sngnsgt Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:37:12pm |
My Grandmother would always 'shhh' us if we were making noise when 'Walter' (as she called him) was on the news.
24![]() |
IslandLibertarian Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:37:15pm |
I'll just think of him sailing his yacht, hand on the tiller, wind in his hair, foul-weather gear ...we can talk about Tet another day.
25![]() |
Lee Coller Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:38:34pm |
re: #16 Kosh's Shadow
Sorry, I was thinking of the lunar landing date, and didn't check any of the many calendars.
That explains itre: #22 zombie
My most vivid memory of Cronkite was on my eighth birthday.
After a rather disappointing brithday with no party, I was watching TV, and he said, "And that's the way it is, [month] [day, 19[year]." And suddenly, my birthday seemed "official" and I suddenly felt very special.
For that, he always held a place in my heart. (More than my $#&@#$% parents, actually. Imagine an eight-year-old with no party!)
You're older than I thought you were.
26![]() |
tradewind Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:38:41pm |
re: #22 zombie
Zombie,
Make one up or give out the real date, doesn't matter, and I promise, Lizards will throw you a b'day party next time!
27![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:38:48pm |
re: #14 3 wood
Condolences to the family.
I have had many Nam Vet's tell me over the years that Cronkite was instrumental in helping the Viet Cong turn abject defeat into victory during the Tet Offensive with his editorializing on his broadcasts.
May he rest in peace.
the VC were virtually wiped out due to Tet...I don't get it
28![]() |
ratbert Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:39:14pm |
I thought he was dead. At least Abe Vigoda is still alive.
29![]() |
jorline Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:39:25pm |
I still remember coming home from school early and seeing my mother crying while watching WC...11-22-1963.
30![]() |
Right Brain Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:39:29pm |
A great American, the most influential journalist, along with Edward Murrow, in history, from a time when journalists liked America and reported the news as it happened and not as they wished it happened. Not cynical, not ironic, just the news.
And thats the way it is, on this day July 17, two thousand and nine.
31![]() |
zombie Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:40:06pm |
Forget about the Vietnam War -- he cut his teeth an an excellent WWII reporter, out with the troops in battle.
Always remember that Cronkhite, despite retroactive criticism for some inaccurate presentation of various Vietnam memes, was rather moderate compared to so many other media people in those days. And by 21st century terms, he was a veritable paleo-con compared to even the most mainstream reporters today!
32![]() |
pink freud Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:40:26pm |
re: #22 zombie
Happy belated eighth birthday, Zombie!
In case there's any doubt whatsoever, you are very special.
33![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:40:49pm |
re: #3 IslandLibertarian
"the most trusted man in America"...wasn't that his un-official title?
Yes-- and some what misplaced trust it was.
34![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:40:58pm |
re: #31 zombie
Forget about the Vietnam War -- he cut his teeth an an excellent WWII reporter, out with the troops in battle.
Always remember that Cronkhite, despite retroactive criticism for some inaccurate presentation of various Vietnam memes, was rather moderate compared to so many other media people in those days. And by 21st century terms, he was a veritable paleo-con compared to even the most mainstream reporters today!
no...he is held accountable
36![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:41:53pm |
re: #31 zombie
Forget about the Vietnam War -- he cut his teeth an an excellent WWII reporter, out with the troops in battle.
Always remember that Cronkhite, despite retroactive criticism for some inaccurate presentation of various Vietnam memes, was rather moderate compared to so many other media people in those days. And by 21st century terms, he was a veritable paleo-con compared to even the most mainstream reporters today!
Anyone that volunteered to get in a B-17 and fly several missions with the 8th USAAF over Germany has my admiration.
37![]() |
Charles Johnson Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:42:05pm |
Sure enough, they're spewing hatred at Cronkite at Free Republic.
38![]() |
zombie Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:43:35pm |
re: #25 Lee Coller
You're older than I thought you were.
That's true -- I must be at least 34 years old (figured out after some calculation-- Walter lasted until the early '80s)!
39![]() |
keeping it simple Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:43:50pm |
re: #19 chedgeman
You're not old - you just have a good memory.
Thanks. Yes, I remember that day very well. I can still see his face in my mind's eye when he made the announcement. He took off his glasses and made an obvious effort to keep from crying. I'm sure that clip and many others will be played on broadcasts tonight
40![]() |
ratbert Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:44:19pm |
My first memory of Walter Cronkite was the Apollo 8 mission. I remember the capsule approaching the moon, I believe in the morning, and he was explaining what was happening. I was a 1st grader then.
41![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:45:33pm |
re: #36 calcajun
Anyone that volunteered to get in a B-17 and fly several missions with the 8th USAAF over Germany has my admiration.
yes, he wanted to be on the edge of history and that's fine...but he broke the rules and tossed away all objectivity after the Tet offensive and went off the deep end...I was there...he has a black mark against him and it is all of his own doing...shit happens
42![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:45:35pm |
There will be a time for those kind of retrospectives I think; just not today.
43![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:45:42pm |
re: #21 unrealizedviewpoint
Not hate. But there are many who took exception to some of what he did. To be sure, he was an industry leader and pioneer. He was human-- he told us the news not like a talking head, but as a friend or a relative. His personable delivery has not been matched by anyone since. And, no matter how you look at it -- 92 is a hell of a run.
I'm sure he made it past the Pearly Gates. He might have some 'splainin' to do to some folks up there, but he's in, to be sure.
44![]() |
zombie Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:45:43pm |
re: #36 calcajun
Anyone that volunteered to get in a B-17 and fly several missions with the 8th USAAF over Germany has my admiration.
From wiki:
"He also landed in a glider with the 101st Airborne in Operation Market-Garden and covered the Battle of the Bulge. After the war, he covered the Nuremberg trials..."
45![]() |
The Shadow Do Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:46:04pm |
Walter Cronkite's reportage on the space program, culminating in Neal Armstrong walking on the moon, was as good as it could get. I don't think anyone tuned in to that event anywhere else. I know, as a kid, I didn't. That should have been his legacy.
I also remember the over the top reactionism he displayed after the shock of Tet. That was running with the crowd. That was reporting, so to say, at its worst. I often wonder if he ever considered an apology for that one. There was a tremendous knee jerk after that action, and he led the way.
At some point in his life he must have known what he had reported was dead wrong, but to the best of my knowledge, he never admitted it.
A mixed bag he was, as are we all I suppose.
And that is all I have to say about that.
RIP Walter.
46![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:46:20pm |
RIP Walter Conkrite.
That moment when he was overcome with emotion during the moon landing coverage is seared into my brain - the pride of accomplishment of this nation.
47![]() |
Noam Sayin' Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:46:21pm |
48![]() |
MarineGrunt Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:46:57pm |
Saw him and a few other CBS types in Nam during Tet '68.
Rest in Peace Walt
50![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:47:39pm |
re: #46 reine.de.tout
RIP Walter Conkrite.
That moment when he was overcome with emotion during the moon landing coverage is seared into my brain - the pride of accomplishment of this nation.
That is my #1 memory of him.
51![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:47:41pm |
re: #41 albusteve
yes, he wanted to be on the edge of history and that's fine...but he broke the rules and tossed away all objectivity after the Tet offensive and went off the deep end...I was there...he has a black mark against him and it is all of his own doing...shit happens
Yes-- that is the big black mark for which I won't forgive. But, it only colors, maybe even slightly tarnishes, the rest of his great volume of work-- does not undo it.
52![]() |
Ojoe Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:47:56pm |
May he rest in peace.
Back in college, when my roommates had a TV, we used to watch him every night. At the end of the newscast, they played part of Beethoven's 9th. Then the sitcom "Hazel" would come on.
53![]() |
swamprat Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:47:57pm |
re: #36 calcajun
Anyone that volunteered to get in a B-17 and fly several missions with the 8th USAAF over Germany has my admiration.
Thank you for giving me that bit of insight.
55![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:49:03pm |
re: #51 calcajun
Yes-- that is the big black mark for which I won't forgive. But, it only colors, maybe even slightly tarnishes, the rest of his great volume of work-- does not undo it.
I disagree...strongly
58![]() |
livefreeor die Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:49:52pm |
re: #46 reine.de.tout
RIP Walter Conkrite.
That moment when he was overcome with emotion during the moon landing coverage is seared into my brain - the pride of accomplishment of this nation.
I remember his announcing that the US hockey team had beaten the Soviets in the 1980 Olympics-"In a stunning upset, ..." You could tell how elated he was even though he was trying to maintain his usual broadcasting voice.
59![]() |
tradewind Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:51:30pm |
Unfortunately, even turning off CBS won't rid the screen of Katie for the next few days...
60![]() |
JEA62 Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:52:02pm |
Back when news was actually news and not the left or right presenting their views disguised as news, and wasn't about ratings but integrity. The last of the great ones is gone. I remember listening to him during the various space missions, watching as the astronauts stepped off the ladder. I'll always remember "And that's the way it is." RIP Walter, we'll miss you.
61![]() |
Ojoe Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:52:40pm |
re: #44 zombie
I would say the glider mission was more dangerous than the B-17!
62![]() |
Racer X Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:52:42pm |
Apollo’s Historic Lunar Landing
Awesome images!
63![]() |
jamgarr Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:52:51pm |
Goodnight Chet
Goodnight David
Goodnight Walter
65![]() |
swamprat Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:53:23pm |
Good night America. And good night from Texaco.
66![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:53:27pm |
67![]() |
Lee Coller Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:53:35pm |
And Cronkite retired under his own terms, unlike his successor!
68![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:54:41pm |
I remember touring the Maine coast years ago, and my guide pointed to a huge house on a cliff overlooking the ocean. "That's Cronkite's retirement home", he said.
69![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:55:05pm |
re: #58 livefreeor die
I remember his announcing that the US hockey team had beaten the Soviets in the 1980 Olympics-"In a stunning upset, ..." You could tell how elated he was even though he was trying to maintain his usual broadcasting voice.
You see, that's what I remember about him.
I know he was a liberal.
But he was so proud of this country and he was not afraid to let it show.
71![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:55:11pm |
To further put his professionalism and influence in perspective, there is no one in broadcasting today who approaches the respect that Americans had for Walter.
72![]() |
avanti Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:55:15pm |
re: #50 BatGuano
That is my #1 memory of him.
Mine too. I think it's important to remember that even those we sometimes disagree with can be patriots, regardless if they are found right or wrong in the end.
That's the biggest bone I had to pick with some on the left about Bush, I felt it was fair to question his decisions, but not his love of country. I feel the same way about Cronkite and some of his opinions.
73![]() |
The Shadow Do Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:55:46pm |
re: #61 Ojoe
I would say the glider mission was more dangerous than the B-17!
Not close, but shows some courage for sure.
74![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:56:19pm |
re: #72 avanti
Mine too. I think it's important to remember that even those we sometimes disagree with can be patriots, regardless if they are found right or wrong in the end.
That's the biggest bone I had to pick with some on the left about Bush, I felt it was fair to question his decisions, but not his love of country. I feel the same way about Cronkite and some of his opinions.
Well, we agree on that!
75![]() |
wrenchwench Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:57:03pm |
re: #71 BatGuano
To further put his professionalism and influence in perspective, there is no one in broadcasting today who approaches the respect that Americans had for Walter.
A lot of people wanted him to run for president.
I'm glad he didn't do it.
76![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:57:21pm |
RIP all the good men that perished in Viet Nam, inspite of the awful treatment by the MSM...they did everything the feds asked them to do and more...they died while journos lived and got rich
77![]() |
IslandLibertarian Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:57:46pm |
79![]() |
callahan23 Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:57:53pm |
re: #58 livefreeor die
I remember his announcing that the US hockey team had beaten the Soviets in the 1980 Olympics-"In a stunning upset, ..." You could tell how elated he was even though he was trying to maintain his usual broadcasting voice.
That sure was a memorable event in time.
I saw that game and it was incredibly awe-inspiring.
80![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:58:03pm |
re: #71 BatGuano
That is a fact. I disagreed with his politics when I grew up, but the man would've never drug his profession in the dirt like "What's the frquency Kenneth" Rather.
81![]() |
Racer X Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:58:18pm |
re: #75 wrenchwench
A lot of people wanted him to run for president.
I'm glad he didn't do it.
I sure wish our president would retire to become a TV anchor. He reads the teleprompter brilliantly!
82![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:58:36pm |
re: #72 avanti
I disagreed with him at times but never questioned his patriotism. His pride in the space program and the landing of Apollo 11 could only well from patriotism. ( no "buts" at this time).
84![]() |
Sambo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:59:04pm |
re: #78 SasquatchOnSteroids
We're never going back to the Moon if Obama and the anti-intellectuals have their way.
85![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:59:05pm |
Although I am only 40, I must admit there is a part of me that feels a certain sadness every time we note the passing of a recognizable figure within the American fabric.
Perhaps it is a reminder of those things once close to me that are now gone. Those things synonymous of another era, family members departed, a different place in time.
I am thinking of my grandfather right now.
RIP Mr. Cronkite.
87![]() |
jvic Fri, Jul 17, 2009 5:59:43pm |
My first reaction was:
There was a lot of effective reporting, but there were Tet and 9/11. Speak nothing but good of the dead. If there is an afterlife, I hope Cronkite finds justice there. Condolences to his family. That's about the best I can do.
ripre: #13 Charles
Most LGF readers don't need to be told this, but please note that any mean-spirited comments about Cronkite will be deleted. If you can't restrain yourself from venting anger, do it somewhere else.
If there is an afterlife, I wish Cronkite the same degree of mercy that I will need myself.
88![]() |
jorline Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:00:15pm |
Evening News Golden Age 1952-1981
Walter Cronkite and Huntley Brinkley Report
89![]() |
Ojoe Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:00:24pm |
re: #73 The Shadow Do
No power. One chance to land. Pilots that did not qualify for other jobs. Partially wooden structures. No runway. If you get down in one piece, you are in a combat zone.
I'll take the B-17
90![]() |
jamgarr Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:00:32pm |
re: #79 callahan23
That sure was a memorable event in time.
I saw that game and it was incredibly awe-inspiring.
Gen X, Y etc. really don't know the feeling we had about the Soviet teams back in the day - all military - full time - funded - steroided.
91![]() |
sngnsgt Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:00:40pm |
Walter Cronkite reported the news, todays info-babes just read the news.
92![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:01:23pm |
re: #81 Racer X
I sure wish our president would retire to become a TV anchor. He reads the teleprompter brilliantly!
Except when the TOTUS can't take it any more and commits hara-kiri.
94![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:01:32pm |
re: #91 sngnsgt
Walter Cronkite reported the news, todays info-babes just read the news.
until he didn't...funny how Harry Reid gets crucified yet Cronkite gets a pass
96![]() |
JEA62 Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:02:15pm |
re: #76 albusteve
The brave soldiers in Vietnam didn't die because the journalists reported what was going on, they died because the politicians screwed up. And Cronkite was the one person courageous enough, and with enough of a reputation for fairness (one that was thoroughly deserved), that could go there and report on what was going on rather than military briefings about how swell things were going.
Please at least read some history before you comment on it.
97![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:02:24pm |
re: #87 jvic
If there is an afterlife, I wish Cronkite the same degree of mercy that I will need myself.
I defer to your classy way of putting it.
98![]() |
The Shadow Do Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:02:42pm |
re: #71 BatGuano
To further put his professionalism and influence in perspective, there is no one in broadcasting today who approaches the respect that Americans had for Walter.
His reporting on the Tet business was the beginning of the end of objective journalism. It was the beginning of the beginning of the activist journalism we know and love today.
Don't doubt for a minute that todays journalists appreciate the collapse of America in Vietnam as a media driven victory to be repeated. Groundbreaking stuff for the modern left.
99![]() |
M. Bensson-Levi Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:03:27pm |
I was unaware of his assessment of the Tet offensive for years afterward. I was busy at the time...dealing with Tet and its aftermath. He was dead wrong. I've been dead wrong in my lifetime also.
"To forgive is divine."
R.I.P Uncle Walter. Condolences to his family.
100![]() |
The Shadow Do Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:03:59pm |
re: #89 Ojoe
No power. One chance to land. Pilots that did not qualify for other jobs. Partially wooden structures. No runway. If you get down in one piece, you are in a combat zone.
I'll take the B-17
Also, one mission - not twenty
102![]() |
Charles Johnson Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:04:26pm |
From Free Republic:
Payers for him - but he was a strident Atheist until he died.
I don't wish that on him, but it is what it is.He HATED God. Hated Him.
I can post whatever documentation you wish about that.
Still - prayers for his soul - and good luck with what you believed Walter.
If you are in Hell now - you now know Eternal Suffering and what it means to be wrong. Christ could have helped you.
But not now. You made your choice.
How terrible.
74 posted on July 17, 2009 5:29:20 PM PDT by SkyPilot
Feel the good Christian love!
103![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:05:02pm |
Cronkite was a huge influence on America and public opinion...there is no question he was not an evil man for his VN war 'mishap'...he was honest and a good patriot, but nobody is perfect...it is what it was and I hold no grudges
104![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:05:09pm |
re: #94 albusteve
Steve, I think it is fair game to question some of the actions and issues surrounding him related to the Vietnam War.
He did just pass away though. There is sure to be more than enough time to reflect on those arguments.
Nothing more, nothing less my friend.
105![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:06:30pm |
re: #102 Charles
That is just vile. No compassion there at all. Fuckwads.
107![]() |
Pvt Bin Jammin Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:06:57pm |
RIP Walter Cronkite. My sympathies to your loved ones.
109![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:07:38pm |
re: #96 JEA62
The brave soldiers in Vietnam didn't die because the journalists reported what was going on, they died because the politicians screwed up. And Cronkite was the one person courageous enough, and with enough of a reputation for fairness (one that was thoroughly deserved), that could go there and report on what was going on rather than military briefings about how swell things were going.
Please at least read some history before you comment on it.
he missed the Tet offensive big time...the already weary public fell for his defeatism and there is no doubt it cost lives...that's the history of it and it is not pretty
110![]() |
LesLein Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:08:00pm |
RIP.
John Podhoretz notes how the media has changed.
"Cronkite was a key figure in many ways, but foremost among them, perhaps, was the fact that he cleared the way for the mainstream media and the Establishment to join what Lionel Trilling called “the adversary culture.” Cronkite, the gravelly voice of accepted American wisdom, whose comportment suggested he kept his money in bonds and would never even have considered exceeding the speed limit, devastated President Lyndon Johnson in the wake of the 1968 Tet Offensive by declaring that the United States 'was mired in stalemate' in Vietnam—when Johnson knew that Tet had been a military triumph. . ."
"When Rather attempted, in [2004], to bring down a president in the midst of a close reelection bid with a report based on obviously forged papers—a greater journalistic sin than Cronkite’s, by far—he was undone in 12 hours by a lawyer in Atlanta commenting on a blog and a jazz musician in Los Angeles with a blog who demonstrated the papers in question had been produced at least a decade after the report claimed they had. Had there been an Internet in 1968, and military bloggers aplenty, Cronkite’s false conclusion about Tet would have been challenged immediately; we would not have had to wait for Braestrup to publish his enormous book nine years later."
I corrected the date in the original.
[Link: www.commentarymagazine.com...]
111![]() |
IslandLibertarian Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:08:10pm |
112![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:09:24pm |
re: #98 The Shadow Do
His reporting on the Tet business was the beginning of the end of objective journalism. It was the beginning of the beginning of the activist journalism we know and love today.
Don't doubt for a minute that todays journalists appreciate the collapse of America in Vietnam as a media driven victory to be repeated. Groundbreaking stuff for the modern left.
indeed groundbreaking...an enormous mistake
113![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:09:35pm |
re: #98 The Shadow Do
His reporting on the Tet business was the beginning of the end of objective journalism. It was the beginning of the beginning of the activist journalism we know and love today.
Don't doubt for a minute that todays journalists appreciate the collapse of America in Vietnam as a media driven victory to be repeated. Groundbreaking stuff for the modern left.
I agree. At some point I 'll rip him up one side and down the other. For me today is not the day. I'm sorry for the precedent that he set in that regard.
114![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:10:23pm |
re: #104 formercorpsman
Steve, I think it is fair game to question some of the actions and issues surrounding him related to the Vietnam War.
He did just pass away though. There is sure to be more than enough time to reflect on those arguments.
Nothing more, nothing less my friend.
okay
115![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:11:40pm |
I would drink with Walter Cronkite anyday...thats the highest regard I can give a man
116![]() |
Kenneth Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:11:44pm |
I loved his coverage of the Apollo moon shots. As a kid fascinated by all things science, my imagination soared. God rest you Mr Cronkite.
119![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:14:04pm |
Well, they've gone wall to wall coverage.
/still no Geraldo or Greta yet
120![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:15:17pm |
re: #118 pingjockey
121![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:16:04pm |
As a child, hearing Walter Cronkite's voice used to always reminded me of the space programs, science, technology, and the future. His voice was synonymous with almost every aspect of new coverage surrounding NASA of which I held a strong interest. He was there during a time when I remember the World's Fair in NYC, trips to the Museum of Natural History, and the fascinating space exhibits in the Allied Building. That's how I remember Walter Cronkite.
122![]() |
Sambo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:16:11pm |
It is a shame that Walter Cronkite did not live long enough to see these images. I think he would have been moved by them:
[Link: bit.ly...]
123![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:16:34pm |
re: #116 Kenneth
I loved his coverage of the Apollo moon shots. As a kid fascinated by all things science, my imagination soared. God rest you Mr Cronkite.
Thats how I will remember tonight.
125![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:18:32pm |
re: #102 Charles
Yeesh. I also can't help but note the irony that the people who hate him the most for predicting failure in Viet Nam are the same people who are today predicting (and cheering) the economic destruction on the United States under Obama.
126![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:18:54pm |
re: #120 Killian Bundy
That's fucking crazy! That's what the one and his crew want to do to the whole country. No one is DC could run a 7/11 and turn a profit and they want to run the whole goddamn economy and health care. Numbnuts.
127![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:19:40pm |
re: #125 Killgore Trout
Yeesh. I also can't help but note the irony that the people who hate him the most for predicting failure in Viet Nam are the same people who are today predicting (and cheering) the economic destruction on the United States under Obama.
Who's cheering?
128![]() |
mikalm Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:20:01pm |
His voice was very much a part of my Sixties and Seventies childhood, and he was very much a dedicated and talented journalist.
As for the Tet Offensive, here's how I put it elsewhere: de mortuis nil nisi bonum, et requiem en pace (speak no ill of the dead, and rest in peace).
129![]() |
Sambo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:20:31pm |
130![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:20:32pm |
Barbara Walters(!) just brought up a good point, no anchor anywhere will ever be as trusted or respected as Walter Cronkite.
131![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:20:43pm |
re: #4 Charles
Yes, I had a little brain fart there.
Charles, check the "Tags" as well. It still has Cronkite with a "K." ;)
132![]() |
The Shadow Do Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:21:12pm |
re: #96 JEA62
The brave soldiers in Vietnam didn't die because the journalists reported what was going on, they died because the politicians screwed up. And Cronkite was the one person courageous enough, and with enough of a reputation for fairness (one that was thoroughly deserved), that could go there and report on what was going on rather than military briefings about how swell things were going.The times were a complete turmoil. Emotions got the best of us all then, including Walter.
I respect the man but it is wrong for everyone, including me, to judge too harshly or too favorably. I have tried since that time to gain perspective but it is hard not only given the times then, but the revisionism since.
Vietnam continues to haunt this country even though you may not have been there to personally exerience it."Please at least read some history before you comment on it."
Take your own advice, the history is not written yet.
133![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:21:20pm |
re: #125 Killgore Trout
Yeesh. I also can't help but note the irony that the people who hate him the most for predicting failure in Viet Nam are the same people who are today predicting (and cheering) the economic destruction on the United States under Obama.
the two are miles apart...destruction has varying meanings it seems
134![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:21:22pm |
re: #127 DEZes
Who's cheering?
That's what I was wondering.
Seems to me the biggest cheerleaders are those writers of magazine and newspaper articles that who like to tell us how much we are enjoying being poorer than we were.
I'm certainly not cheering.
135![]() |
callahan23 Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:21:35pm |
re: #122 Sambo
It is a shame that Walter Cronkite did not live long enough to see these images. I think he would have been moved by them:
[Link: bit.ly...]
That is abso-freakin'-awesome.
Now all those conspiracy idjits will have to shut the f*** up.
Visual proof of the Apollo landing sites.
136![]() |
SlartyBartfast Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:21:56pm |
re: #71 BatGuano
He loved this country--this country loved him.
The relationship have broken down because "journalists" have abandoned the former, else they would enjoy the latter.
137![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:22:05pm |
re: #129 Sambo
There's a website, wechoosetogotothemoon.org that is running a replay of the entire Apollo 11 mission.
139![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:22:46pm |
re: #102 Charles
Christians are strictly forbidden from judging who's going to hell. That's up to G-d, not to them. Jesus said, "Judge not, that thou be not judged." It seems that sanctimonious bastard has forgotten that.
141![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:24:24pm |
re: #84 Sambo
We're never going back to the Moon if Obama and the anti-intellectuals have their way.
Sambo, speaking of going back to the moon, did you see Krauthammer's new opinion column on that subject? I don't necessarily agree 100%, but I think it's a beautifully written and persuasive piece of work:
142![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:24:59pm |
143![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:24:59pm |
re: #139 quickjustice
Christians are strictly forbidden from judging who's going to hell. That's up to G-d, not to them.
Gee, when I said the same thing after Saddam Hussein's execution, I got thrown into the smelting pot.
144![]() |
quickjustice Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:03pm |
Vietnam was the first war to be televised nationally, with graphic images in every living room every evening. Lyndon Johnson's "guns and butter" strategy, where most of America was unaffected by the war, backfired on him badly.
145![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:05pm |
re: #135 callahan23
That is abso-freakin'-awesome.
Now all those conspiracy idjits will have to shut the f*** up.
Visual proof of the Apollo landing sites.
"Its all photoshop."
My point here is, the nut cases will not accept anything that may derail their conspiracies.
I have argued with them before.
146![]() |
callahan23 Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:13pm |
I need to check out.
See y'all down the road.
I love you (Lizardim} - mostly. Really!
147![]() |
SlartyBartfast Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:19pm |
re: #119 Killian Bundy
Well, they've gone wall to wall coverage.
/still no Geraldo or Greta yet
Yes, but imitation being is the sincerest form of praise, you don't see today's talking-heads imitating his "straight-up-the-middle" integrity. Their praise is therefore tainted in my mind...just so much lip-service.
148![]() |
mikalm Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:20pm |
re: #139 quickjustice
Well said. And as I once put it, "I'm too worried about my own sins to spend much time judging others'."
149![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:40pm |
re: #146 callahan23
I need to check out.
See y'all down the road.
I love you (Lizardim} - mostly. Really!
Have a good one Callahan.
150![]() |
descolada9 Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:42pm |
His Vietnam reporting has left a bad taste in my mouth, but godspeed to him nonetheless and best to his family.
151![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:52pm |
re: #129 Sambo
That is cool! Watched that show on Discover or History Channel about the moon troofers. Buncha asshats.
152![]() |
Sambo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:25:59pm |
re: #141 ShanghaiEd
Have not seen it. Thanks for the reference, SE!
153![]() |
callahan23 Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:26:47pm |
re: #145 DEZes
"Its all photoshop."
My point here is, the nut cases will not accept anything that may derail their conspiracies.
I have argued with them before.
Resistant to facts. Intellectual teflon no fact will stick.
G'-night (DEZes)
154![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:26:47pm |
re: #134 reine.de.tout
That's what I was wondering.
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
155![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:26:48pm |
re: #146 callahan23
I need to check out.
See y'all down the road.
I love you (Lizardim} - mostly. Really!
Take good care my friend.
156![]() |
jaunte Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:27:05pm |
re: #141 ShanghaiEd
Sambo, speaking of going back to the moon, did you see Krauthammer's new opinion column on that subject? I don't necessarily agree 100%, but I think it's a beautifully written and persuasive piece of work:
Good link, thanks for posting. I especially liked this part:
Yes, we have a financial crisis. No one's asking for a crash Manhattan Project. All we need is sufficient funding from the hundreds of billions being showered from Washington -- "stimulus" monies that, unlike Eisenhower's interstate highway system or Kennedy's Apollo program, will leave behind not a trace on our country or our consciousness -- to build Constellation and get us back to Earth orbit and the moon a half-century after the original landing.
Why do it? It's not for practicality. We didn't go to the moon to spin off cooling suits and freeze-dried fruit. Any technological return is a bonus, not a reason. We go for the wonder and glory of it. Or, to put it less grandly, for its immense possibilities. We choose to do such things, said JFK, "not because they are easy, but because they are hard." And when you do such magnificently hard things -- send sailing a Ferdinand Magellan or a Neil Armstrong -- you open new human possibility in ways utterly unpredictable.
157![]() |
Sambo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:27:19pm |
re: #137 pingjockey
Thank you, PJ. I am signed up with that site for the last few days. Some nice stuff there.
Here's a bit of how whacked I am. I have some of the Apollo 11 mission audio on my iPod, and sometimes have it running the background while I'm at work in my office.
158![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:27:20pm |
re: #141 ShanghaiEd
Sambo, speaking of going back to the moon, did you see Krauthammer's new opinion column on that subject? I don't necessarily agree 100%, but I think it's a beautifully written and persuasive piece of work:
International Space Station, still under construction, may be debris by 2016
/we're in full space exploration retreat
159![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:28:04pm |
re: #102 Charles
As a Christian, I am ...speechless. At the moment.
160![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:29:09pm |
re: #139 quickjustice
Christians are strictly forbidden from judging who's going to hell. That's up to G-d, not to them. Jesus said, "Judge not, that thou be not judged." It seems that sanctimonious bastard has forgotten that.
When will they ever learn?
163![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:30:47pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
how did we get to where we are?...90% of this meltdown lies squarely at the feet of the democrats...all last fall while the stock market was in freefall BO did nothing but hire tax cheats to run the Treasury...quadrupled the national debt...defies history and the laws of economocs and we are supposed to sit here and cheer some minor rebound to a disaster of liberal making?...I think not
164![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:31:00pm |
re: #156 jaunte
Nice. Exploration damnit! We are curious us humans, have to see what's over the next hill. We lose that drive, we lose ourselves. IMO.
165![]() |
formercorpsman Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:31:07pm |
Have a good night folks, I have a weekend full of baseball.
If anyone is so inclined, please say a prayer for the family of Sgt. Michael W. Heede.
Another Marine who paid the ultimate sacrifice this week.
166![]() |
Bob Dillon Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:31:38pm |
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
At Last, 40 Years Later: Apollo Landers Seen on the Moon
Walter would have loved to see these photos.
168![]() |
Bubbaman Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:31:53pm |
Cronkite set a standard for broadcast journalism that was rarely approached and never eclipsed. How we are in desperate need of honest journalists. RIP Walter and smooth sailing...
169![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:32:47pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
Not reporting what you want to read is far from cheering.
170![]() |
SteveRogers Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:32:54pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
Reporting the truth isn't "cheering" the destruction of our free market, I mean, neo-free market economy.
You are assuming what those of us on the right are thinking and what our intent is without any evidence to back it up.
I don't know any conservatives that have ever "cheered" the immense damage that those on the left (and some Republicans) have done to our economy.
171![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:33:25pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
I*'m going to disagree. I want Nat'l Health care not to pass, I don't want most of the rest of the economy run by DC insiders, ie the auto industry. I don't want the USA turned into the EU.
172![]() |
mikalm Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:34:30pm |
re: #160 BatGuano
When will they ever learn?
There's a great story by G.K. Chesterton called "The Chief Mourner of Marne" "which deals with the theme of judging and forgiveness. The point it makes is that we all too often excuse, ignore or rationalize sins we ourselves commit or are comfortable with, while we violently condemn ones outside our own experience. I suppose that's human nature.
173![]() |
Walter L. Newton Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:34:44pm |
re: #170 SteveRogers
Reporting the truth isn't "cheering" the destruction of our free market, I mean, neo-free market economy.
You are assuming what those of us on the right are thinking and what our intent is without any evidence to back it up.I don't know any conservatives that have ever "cheered" the immense damage that those on the left (and some Republicans) have done to our economy.
No, reporting the truth, according to liberals, is "seething and raging."
174![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:35:28pm |
re: #163 albusteve
how did we get to where we are?...90% of this meltdown lies squarely at the feet of the democrats...all last fall while the stock market was in freefall BO did nothing but hire tax cheats to run the Treasury
Last fall?!? BO was elected in November, and sworn in in January (a winter month).
175![]() |
Walter L. Newton Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:35:39pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
There you go with that all inclusive statement, like everyone here fits into your description.
176![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:35:57pm |
Walter Cronkite passes away and guess who's unavailable for comment, or hasn't been heard from so far? The man who followed him into that anchor chair.
177![]() |
jamgarr Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:36:13pm |
re: #172 mikalm
Speaker For the Dead by Orson Scott Card
not as good as the first two books but good for your point
178![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:36:27pm |
re: #163 albusteve
90% of this meltdown lies squarely at the feet of the democrats...
Not even close to reality.
179![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:36:59pm |
180![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:37:02pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
my bad, then, because I don't go to right-wing (or left-wing) blogs, can't stomach the shrieking tone of most of them.
But unemployment, I believe, is up to record levels (10% or so), and that's not a "doom and gloom" prediction, that's a fact. There are several lizards here whose lives have been affected.
I watch the market myself, because I have some good investments, so I'm aware that I'm OK.
So, I'm unaware of much "cheerleading" for the economy to fail.
181![]() |
Walter L. Newton Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:37:10pm |
re: #163 albusteve
how did we get to where we are?...90% of this meltdown lies squarely at the feet of the democrats...all last fall while the stock market was in freefall BO did nothing but hire tax cheats to run the Treasury...quadrupled the national debt...defies history and the laws of economocs and we are supposed to sit here and cheer some minor rebound to a disaster of liberal making?...I think not
The truth never was clearer... kudos Steve.
182![]() |
Alan Furman Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:37:51pm |
re: #125 Killgore Trout
Yeesh. I also can't help but note the irony that the people who hate him the most for predicting failure in Viet Nam are the same people who are today predicting (and cheering) the economic destruction on the United States under Obama.
Whatever the personality defects of some Freepers, Stalinism ultimately lost and the looting and bullying of capitalists does ultimately lead to stagnation.
184![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:40:07pm |
re: #182 Alan Furman
Whatever the personality defects of some Freepers, Stalinism ultimately lost and the looting and bullying of capitalists does ultimately lead to stagnation.
/no, no, no, it's good that TOTUS does these things, it's real good
185![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:40:16pm |
186![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:40:23pm |
re: #180 reine.de.tout
So, I'm unaware of much "cheerleading" for the economy to fail.
I'm not "cheerleading" for a failed economy; it will recover or not, no matter what I do.
But I do want us, as a nation, to wake up and ask our collective self the same thing I asked myself after I realized I never should have married my ex:
"What the hell was I thinking?"
187![]() |
jamgarr Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:40:31pm |
188![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:40:57pm |
last fall, regardless of the banking bailout, which are mostly, but not all bullshit...a 6mo moritorium on payroll taxes and a freeze on govt spending...abolish the death tax, roll back capital gains to a one digit rate...roll back corproate taxes to some reasonable, competitive level...pump public money into the economy...let GM fall and anyother business that has some dead end contract with unions...BO did none of these things...lauding some natural upsurge in the economy right now is laughable...leave it alone and loosen up money and it will heal itself...BO does not want a healthy economy, he wants our economy controlled by the lunatic donks
189![]() |
sngnsgt Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:40:58pm |
There is an asteroid named after Walter Cronkite. 6318 Cronkite
191![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:41:30pm |
there is a nice soft rain coming down here this evening.
192![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:41:34pm |
re: #174 victor_yugo
Last fall?!? BO was elected in November, and sworn in in January (a winter month).
winter...it was cold as I recall...my bad
194![]() |
Killgore Trout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:41:53pm |
re: #180 reine.de.tout
Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Most of what we're looking at now is the inevitable fallout of things that have been happening for the past 20-30 years. Regardless, the economy will probably improve under Obama's leadership and this will make a lot of people unhappy. The predictions that Obama will destroy the economy, lead us into Marxism, round up his opponents, declare himself dictator, allow Islamists to invade, etc will probably not become reality.
195![]() |
SteveRogers Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:42:09pm |
re: #175 Walter L. Newton
There you go with that all inclusive statement, like everyone here fits into your description.
I concur. KT should at least attempt to have enough honesty to provide details rather than vague, sweeping statements designed to impugn all conservatives.
I'm not holding my breath though.
196![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:42:54pm |
re: #182 Alan Furman
Whatever the personality defects of some Freepers, Stalinism ultimately lost and the looting and bullying of capitalists does ultimately lead to stagnation.
Did you hear Blinky yesterday?
/well, if it turns out we don't need the tax surcharges for socialized medicine, we'll just spend the money on something else, she really said that
197![]() |
M. Bensson-Levi Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:44:21pm |
re: #186 victor_yugo
The fault lies, in all probability, not with WHAT you were thinking, but rather what you were thinking WITH.
200![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:45:21pm |
re: #194 Killgore Trout
Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Most of what we're looking at now is the inevitable fallout of things that have been happening for the past 20-30 years. Regardless, the economy will probably improve under Obama's leadership and this will make a lot of people unhappy. The predictions that Obama will destroy the economy, lead us into Marxism, round up his opponents, declare himself dictator, allow Islamists to invade, etc will probably not become reality.
unemployment is well over 10% in 16 states right now, and rising...this post is just ridiculous...you sound way more paranoid than the people you accuse of paranoia
201![]() |
mikalm Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:45:34pm |
202![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:46:07pm |
re: #158 Killian Bundy
International Space Station, still under construction, may be debris by 2016
/we're in full space exploration retreat
Thanks for the link, KB. Looks like we're in retreat, for sure. More's the pity, I say.
203![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:46:32pm |
re: #194 Killgore Trout
Sheesh. I haven't seen anyone here spouting that crap. What I see is a President and congress hell bent on getting gov't control of as much of everything as they can, just like the EU. Gov't contol over that much of my life IS NOT in the constitution, neither is having 34 czars overseeing things answerable only to the WH.
204![]() |
NY Nana Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:46:57pm |
Since some posters dug down a spinoff about Walter Cronkite, I wrote this, in response:
Yoo,hoo, down-diggers, Walter Cronkite is dead. He deserves respect far more than Michael Jackson, even though Mr. Cronkite probably could not carry a tune.Mr. Cronkite was a raging liberal, but I will never forget how he broke the news of President Kennedy's death on that terrible day, Nov. 22, 1962.
May Mr. Cronkite rest in peace.We will not be hearing very much about him, certainly not the adulation given to Michael Jackson, ad nauseum.
I stopped watching CBS altogether while he was still the anchorman, but for goodness' sake, if you can't say something nice about someone who has just died? Just keep quiet.
205![]() |
Pullus Iulius Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:46:59pm |
Man, I loved that guy. Started watching him in the 50s on The 20th Century, but he went back a lot farther than that. I came to hate his politics, especially in his latter years when he became a public scold. But there's a lot more to life than politics. There are fewer and fewer giants walking this earth...
206![]() |
reine.de.tout Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:47:20pm |
re: #194 Killgore Trout
Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Most of what we're looking at now is the inevitable fallout of things that have been happening for the past 20-30 years. Regardless, the economy will probably improve under Obama's leadership and this will make a lot of people unhappy.
I would the absolutely thrilled to death if the economy improves and ends up better than before. I don't think it will happen anytime soon, but I will be completely happy.
The predictions that Obama will destroy the economy, lead us into Marxism, round up his opponents, declare himself dictator, allow Islamists to invade, etc will probably not become reality.
I've never "predicted" any of that stuff. Americans are nothing if not resourceful people, and we will end up being OK. But right now, I'm just not inclined to accept your "probablies", and will wait to see what happens.
207![]() |
jamgarr Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:47:34pm |
209![]() |
CynicalConservative Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:48:46pm |
210![]() |
Walter L. Newton Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:48:51pm |
re: #195 SteveRogers
I concur. KT should at least attempt to have enough honesty to provide details rather than vague, sweeping statements designed to impugn all conservatives.
I'm not holding my breath though.
Don't, you'll be disappointed.
211![]() |
jvic Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:48:51pm |
re: #187 jamgarr
Have you read Ender's Game, etc?
If you can, get hold of the original self-contained short story.
212![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:49:11pm |
a criminal tax cheat runs the Treasury...he makes policy...
a criminal tax cheat is chairman of House ways and means...BO sycophants...BO droolers run CA, MI, Mass, NY, NJ...nuance that
213![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:49:19pm |
re: #197 M. Bensson-Levi
The fault lies, in all probability, not with WHAT you were thinking, but rather what you were thinking WITH.
Other times, you would be correct, but this time I was definitely not thinking with the "wrong" head.
With several years between then and now, I can see clearly how I got into the mess. But without that initial shock (yes, I went into shock when I found out the truth), denial is protracted and healing is delayed.
214![]() |
capitalist piglet Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:49:44pm |
re: #194 Killgore Trout
Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Most of what we're looking at now is the inevitable fallout of things that have been happening for the past 20-30 years. Regardless, the economy will probably improve under Obama's leadership and this will make a lot of people unhappy. The predictions that Obama will destroy the economy, lead us into Marxism, round up his opponents, declare himself dictator, allow Islamists to invade, etc will probably not become reality.
Probably not? Is that some sort of Killgore Trout Wry Humor, that only liberals can hear?
215![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:49:51pm |
re: #194 Killgore Trout
Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Most of what we're looking at now is the inevitable fallout of things that have been happening for the past 20-30 years. Regardless, the economy will probably improve under Obama's leadership and this will make a lot of people unhappy. The predictions that Obama will destroy the economy, lead us into Marxism, round up his opponents, declare himself dictator, allow Islamists to invade, etc will probably not become reality.
You may explain the fallout of the last 20 or 30 years, I would like to hear it.
Anyone who would be happy that the economy improved under any administration is in need of serious help.
Regardless, the ground work is being layed, If the economy improves Obama gets Kudos, if it fails, well its simply fallout from the last few decades.
The rest is straw men that are not worth my time.
216![]() |
Sambo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:51:30pm |
re: #194 Killgore Trout
More like 40 - 50 years, or more. But I believe the massive spending by the current administration essentially enslaves the most productive people in America and robs them of the necessary conditions for self-sufficiency. And yes, I think that is "by design."
217![]() |
SasquatchOnSteroids Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:51:47pm |
218![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:52:04pm |
re: #102 Charles
Speaking as a Christian, there is no excuse for this form of stupidity. Jesus hung with drunks and party animals to minister to them--not berate them.
The person who wrote this is no different than the gays at gay pride parades that fling their sexuality in the faces of all to see-- they are, at their cores, insecure in their faith and beliefs and need to judge and berate others.
As my Lord and Redeemer, the Jewish carpenter said, don't mind the speck in someone else's eye when you have a plank in yours.
None of us knew what was in the heart of Mr. Cronkite-- that was between him and God. That's why Christians call it a "personal" relationship.
Now, back to the news...
219![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:52:04pm |
re: #207 jamgarr
1st read Enders game as a short story. Need to get the others. Also David Weber has me hooked on Honor Harrington. Damn the man!
220![]() |
jamgarr Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:52:23pm |
221![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:52:34pm |
re: #215 DEZes
You may explain the fallout of the last 20 or 30 years, I would like to hear it.
Anyone who would not be happy that the economy improved under any administration is in need of serious help.
Regardless, the ground work is being layed, If the economy improves Obama gets Kudos, if it fails, well its simply fallout from the last few decades.
The rest is straw men that are not worth my time.
pimf.
222![]() |
BatGuano Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:53:02pm |
re: #163 albusteve
Sorry, it took so long to upding you. I stepped away and I am now trying to catch up.
223![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:54:25pm |
question for liberals and BO supporters...
why has BO closed the door for a federal bailout of CA?...
think about it
224![]() |
Sambo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:54:35pm |
Catch you good folks later. Dinner calls. Thank you for an interesting discussion.
225![]() |
LGoPs Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:55:07pm |
re: #216 Sambo
More like 40 - 50 years, or more. But I believe the massive spending by the current administration essentially enslaves the most productive people in America and robs them of the necessary conditions for self-sufficiency. And yes, I think that is "by design."
Don't worry. KT figures that since Obama doesn't wear a fucking "I heart Lenin" button, he can't possibly be a communist bastard.
226![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:56:31pm |
why is BO hanging CA out to dry and Boxer and Pelosi play stupid?
227![]() |
SteveRogers Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:56:43pm |
re: #224 Sambo
Catch you good folks later. Dinner calls. Thank you for an interesting discussion.
Chow.
228![]() |
LGoPs Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:57:05pm |
re: #226 albusteve
why is BO hanging CA out to dry and Boxer and Pelosi play stupid?
I hadn't heard that. What gives?
230![]() |
1SG(ret) Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:57:54pm |
Why would anyone worry or care what the opinion is of someone that couldn't get off their duff to fore-fill one of what I believe is our most important civic duties: VOTE
231![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:57:55pm |
re: #226 albusteve
why is BO hanging CA out to dry and Boxer and Pelosi play stupid?
/it'd cost much less than bailing out the car companies
232![]() |
NY Nana Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:58:53pm |
re: #174 victor_yugo
Last fall?!? BO was elected in November, and sworn in in January (a winter month).
Don't remind me! My birthday was forever spoiled...January 20. And I am even angrier now that I was then. I could not imagine that the pain would increase exponentially.
/My brain hurts.
233![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:58:58pm |
re: #228 LGoPs
I hadn't heard that. What gives?
to do so would admit defeat of the liberal dream...CA is taxing everything in sight while 3000 people a day flee the state...tax tax tax
234![]() |
livefreeor die Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:59:28pm |
re: #226 albusteve
why is BO hanging CA out to dry and Boxer and Pelosi play stupid?
I don't think they're playing.
235![]() |
JacksonTn Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:59:46pm |
re: #223 albusteve
question for liberals and BO supporters...
why has BO closed the door for a federal bailout of CA?...
think about it
albusteve ... there is more to the back story ... but these people not crazy about Arnold ... and Obama owes them big big time ...
[Link: action.seiu.org...]
236![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:59:48pm |
re: #226 albusteve
why is BO hanging CA out to dry and Boxer and Pelosi play stupid?
/Boxer isn't acting, she's 20 pounds of stupid in a ten pound bag
237![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:59:51pm |
re: #231 Killian Bundy
/it'd cost much less than bailing out the car companies
probably...why not give 45m uninsured people a million each...problem solved
238![]() |
jvic Fri, Jul 17, 2009 6:59:52pm |
239![]() |
Killian Bundy Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:00:38pm |
re: #237 albusteve
probably...why not give 45m uninsured people a million each...problem solved
/careful with the math there cowboy
240![]() |
livefreeor die Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:01:10pm |
re: #236 Killian Bundy
/Boxer isn't acting, she's 20 pounds of stupid in a ten pound bag
That's Senator Boxer. She worked very hard to get that title.
Not.
She actually coasted in on the wave of Anita Hill outrage.
241![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:01:26pm |
re: #235 JacksonTn
albusteve ... there is more to the back story ... but these people not crazy about Arnold ... and Obama owes them big big time ...
[Link: action.seiu.org...]
that's alot of electorate right there
242![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:02:05pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
Killgore: As you know, my opinions differ with yours in too many areas to count, but I think you have hit a nail squarely on the head, here. My pet peeve is double standards, of any political persuasion, and this is one of the central ones of our day, IMO.
People on the Right predict disaster if a course of action is taken/not taken, and it's "just telling the truth." People on the Left predict disaster if a course of action is taken/not taken, and it's "cheerleading for defeat!"
I just don't buy that dichotomy. As the old song says, "I may have been born yesterday, but I was up real late last night..."
As far as I can tell, the "cheerleading for defeat" slander is one of the most insidious of Karl Rove's creations, and it has needlessly divided good, patriotic Americans since the first time it was uttered. And will continue to, until somebody is able to point out the double standard in a way that resonates with the public.
243![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:02:37pm |
re: #236 Killian Bundy
/Boxer isn't acting, she's 20 pounds of stupid in a ten pound bag
trying to make pizza pie out of horse shit...but I like the bag analogy more
244![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:03:06pm |
FNC is doing an Apollo 11 special, hosted by Greta, oh well.
245![]() |
NY Nana Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:03:11pm |
re: #208 pingjockey
Thank you. It just got to me. To see such a dignified man break down like that? He became all of us.
When I saw what Charles found at Freeper? I nearly puked.
246![]() |
LGoPs Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:03:28pm |
re: #233 albusteve
to do so would admit defeat of the liberal dream...CA is taxing everything in sight while 3000 people a day flee the state...tax tax tax
It would be an interesting play. If Kalifornia collapses it's proof, in living color, that unbridled liberalism is ruinous. If on the other hand the bastard bails Kalifornia out it could camoflauge the damage that's been done. Kinda like bailing out the car companies camoflauges the ruin that the unions have created...
247![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:03:35pm |
248![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:05:14pm |
re: #225 LGoPs
Don't worry. KT figures that since Obama doesn't wear a fucking "I heart Lenin" button, he can't possibly be a communist bastard.
This is getting old, If I refuse to line up like a baby duck behind its mother wandering into traffic, I must be cheering for failure.
Where I see most of the cheering from is the left happy to vote their way into my paycheck, and when someone slaps their hands they howl like banshees.
And I am sick and tired of people who have no idea how to pay their bills giving me advise on balancing a budget.
249![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:05:16pm |
re: #125 Killgore Trout
Yeesh. I also can't help but note the irony that the people who hate him the most for predicting failure in Viet Nam are the same people who are today predicting (and cheering) the economic destruction on the United States under Obama.
He didn't predict the failure in Viet Nam. Instead of reporting the news he began either editorializing it or embellishing it by purposely showing dead and wounded US troops on the evening news. Tet was a success militarily, but was a dismal failure as reported by someone (at the time) who was widely trusted. IMHO he violated the trust Americans had for him. I watched the nightly news as NVA regulars and VC made their way across Viet Nam after the Paris treaties were signed supposedly ending hostilities. I remember when Saigon fell and the rush for people to get to the last helicopters out. Also remember the boat people (work with one today) escaping one hell hole only to find themselves at the mercy of the seas.
As to cheering on the economic destruction of the US, I'm taking part in removing roughly $3,000,000 of production equipment from a factory that just closed for shipment and re-installation to a plant in Canada. Upwards of 500 people are out of work with that plant closing and those skilled jobs will never, ever come back. Sadly the manufacturing base that the US once had is going away. How many burger flippers do you need in a country our size? How many burger flipper jobs pay significantly above minimum wage? How many financial advisors/stock traders do you need? What do they produce that benefits people? Manufacturing made it possible for us to win in WWII. How many textile mills remain in the US? How many tire plants, not tire stores, remain here in the US? How many silicon foundries remain in the US? Our manufacturing base has eroded away and few people even seem to be aware of the significance of that.
RIP Walter.
250![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:05:20pm |
re: #246 LGoPs
It would be an interesting play. If Kalifornia collapses it's proof, in living color, that unbridled liberalism is ruinous. If on the other hand the bastard bails Kalifornia out it could camoflauge the damage that's been done. Kinda like bailing out the car companies camoflauges the ruin that the unions have created...
yes exactly...it's all a fraud, nearly criminal imo
251![]() |
pingjockey Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:05:30pm |
re: #245 NY Nana
Yeah, I dinged up your comment. Some people have no damn manners.
252![]() |
Fenway_Nation Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:05:47pm |
re: #242 ShanghaiEd
As far as I can tell, the "cheerleading for defeat" slander is one of the most insidious of Karl Rove's creations, and it has needlessly divided good, patriotic Americans since the first time it was uttered. And will continue to, until somebody is able to point out the double standard in a way that resonates with the public.
Nope.
Insidious is letting the likes of Micheal Moore or Sean Penn define what 'patriotic' is...
253![]() |
JacksonTn Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:05:51pm |
re: #242 ShanghaiEd
Killgore: As you know, my opinions differ with yours in too many areas to count, but I think you have hit a nail squarely on the head, here. My pet peeve is double standards, of any political persuasion, and this is one of the central ones of our day, IMO.
People on the Right predict disaster if a course of action is taken/not taken, and it's "just telling the truth." People on the Left predict disaster if a course of action is taken/not taken, and it's "cheerleading for defeat!"
I just don't buy that dichotomy. As the old song says, "I may have been born yesterday, but I was up real late last night..."
As far as I can tell, the "cheerleading for defeat" slander is one of the most insidious of Karl Rove's creations, and it has needlessly divided good, patriotic Americans since the first time it was uttered. And will continue to, until somebody is able to point out the double standard in a way that resonates with the public.
SE ... the part of your post in bold above ... that right there shows how you cannot see the truth about progessives/democrats/socialists party ... you think they are sweet angels? ... oh, yeah, Karl Rove was the "first" person to ever do anything like that ... swirl ...
254![]() |
M. Bensson-Levi Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:06:10pm |
re: #213 victor_yugo
You know, of course, that I was joking. However, we've all been there at one time, or another. We lucky ones had it happen before we married.
I remember sitting with a woman that I had been jilted by, and was crazy about, years after the fact, as the result of a chance meeting. An awful lot of water had passed under the bridge. We were having coffee, and as I listened to her prattle on about this or that nonsense, I found myself thinking, "What an incredibly shallow dink! What the hell did I ever see in you?" It was great, like driving a stake trough a vampire's heart.
Like I said, we've all been there. Glad you're over it.
256![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:07:50pm |
re: #246 LGoPs
If Kalifornia collapses it's proof, in living color, that unbridled liberalism is ruinous. If on the other hand the bastard bails Kalifornia out it could camoflauge the damage that's been done.
Or it would just bring the punishment of Kommunism to the doorstep of every household in the USA.
Socialism doesn't spread the happiness. It just makes sure everyone's equally miserable.
257![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:08:10pm |
re: #253 JacksonTn
history started in November 2000...fact
258![]() |
NY Nana Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:08:52pm |
re: #251 pingjockey
Yeah, I dinged up your comment. Some people have no damn manners.
Someone dug me down? I must be doing something right!
Thanks again!
259![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:09:31pm |
re: #242 ShanghaiEd
Yeah, he hit the nail on the head alright.
Yours.
260![]() |
livefreeor die Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:11:10pm |
re: #245 NY Nana
Thank you. It just got to me. To see such a dignified man break down like that? He became all of us.
When I saw what Charles found at Freeper? I nearly puked.
Thank you for posting that video.
261![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:11:22pm |
262![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:12:05pm |
re: #224 Sambo
Catch you good folks later. Dinner calls. Thank you for an interesting discussion.
Take care, Sambo. Always a pleasure.
263![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:12:59pm |
re: #229 Fenway_Nation
Pelosi's playing stupid?
If true, she's the greatest method actor since Brando.
264![]() |
Fenway_Nation Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:13:52pm |
265![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:13:52pm |
266![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:13:54pm |
re: #254 M. Bensson-Levi
You know, of course, that I was joking.
Yeah, a shot along that vein is usually a dose of humor. (all puns intended)
Glad you're over it.
Actually, thanks to an odd combination of circumstances, I have found in the last few months that there are some lingering issues to deal with.
267![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:14:40pm |
re: #263 calcajun
If true, she's the greatest method actor since Brando.
she knows what's at stake in CA...her ass is on the line and I think it reflects in her bizarre Hitlerian behavior in the House
268![]() |
LGoPs Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:15:17pm |
re: #242 ShanghaiEd
Killgore: As you know, my opinions differ with yours in too many areas to count, but I think you have hit a nail squarely on the head, here. My pet peeve is double standards, of any political persuasion, and this is one of the central ones of our day, IMO.
People on the Right predict disaster if a course of action is taken/not taken, and it's "just telling the truth." People on the Left predict disaster if a course of action is taken/not taken, and it's "cheerleading for defeat!"
I just don't buy that dichotomy. As the old song says, "I may have been born yesterday, but I was up real late last night..."
As far as I can tell, the "cheerleading for defeat" slander is one of the most insidious of Karl Rove's creations, and it has needlessly divided good, patriotic Americans since the first time it was uttered. And will continue to, until somebody is able to point out the double standard in a way that resonates with the public.
Ed - I don't know where to begin and I can't hang around long so I'll be brief. your comment on double standards is a hot button with me, mainly because for most of my life what I've seen is a relentless liberal onslaught on everything that I beleive in, things that my parents and I escaped when we emigrated to America from a communist country.
The bottom line is that rather than a double standard there is a single standard in America. And that standard is that liberals control everything. The media, the courts, education, the governement. And they screech like banshees at the few outlets that conservatives still maintain - Talk Radio, Fox news, part of the internet.
The gulf between our viewpoints is so wide I can't see across it.
269![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:15:31pm |
re: #252 Fenway_Nation
Nope.
Insidious is letting the likes of Micheal Moore or Sean Penn define what 'patriotic' is...
I never met those guys, Fenway. They don't define anything for me. Back to my point...?
270![]() |
victor_yugo Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:15:33pm |
re: #264 Fenway_Nation
And we're all her captive audience.
As long as you are able to unplug your television from the power outlet, you are not her captive audience.
271![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:16:09pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
There's plenty of cheering. Do you ever see any good economic news posted on "right wing" blogs? They'll only post bad news or doom and gloom predictions about the impending implosion. New home starts rose today higher than expected. Nobody reported that. We had another up week on the market. Nobody reported that. Most economists are reporting that the economy is recovering. Where's the right wing coverage?
Rush Limbaugh's "hoping for failure" is no different than the left's hoping for defeat in Iraq or Viet Nam.
You can't gauge the tenor of the "right wing" by blogs. If by right wing you're inferring conservative I will say that the real tone of conservatives is overwhelmingly outside of the blogs. Those that are not of retirement age are working every day to earn a living and provide for their futures and their families. They are hoping that the economy stays afloat and are able to continue working today, tomorrow and in the future.
How can one compare Rush Limbaugh, a sole voice on the radio, with the left wing movements that hoped for defeat in Iraq or Vietnam? Mr. Limbaugh may represent a movement but he only represents a part of the conservative movement. There is more to this country and its people than blogs and radio shows -- far more.
273![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:18:45pm |
re: #267 albusteve
she knows what's at stake in CA...her ass is on the line and I think it reflects in her bizarre Hitlerian behavior in the House
I thought she had the lip waxed last week?
274![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:19:35pm |
re: #271 Gus 802
some people live inside the internet, born and raised there...no wives or children...isolated in a cyber world that can mean whatever you want it to...reality is confused with fantasy
275![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:19:36pm |
276![]() |
LGoPs Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:20:16pm |
277![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:21:00pm |
278![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:21:17pm |
o does need to fail, the sooner the better.
who the hell is this person who came out of no where w/ no valid credentials or experience or real job training? and w/ in 6 months he is turning our country upside down w/ such radical socialist plans.
it is happening so fast and that is not fast enough for him.
280![]() |
JacksonTn Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:22:08pm |
More on Obama and the SEIU ... they own him ...
[Link: www.chicagotribune.com...]
281![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:22:31pm |
282![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:23:25pm |
re: #278 nyc redneck
o does need to fail, the sooner the better.
who the hell is this person who came out of no where w/ no valid credentials or experience or real job training? and w/ in 6 months he is turning our country upside down w/ such radical socialist plans.
it is happening so fast and that is not fast enough for him.
it's a sad commentary on AmIdol politics...I'm not at all certain there is a solution...sorry for my pessimism
284![]() |
Perplexed Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:25:01pm |
re: #278 nyc redneck
o does need to fail, the sooner the better.
who the hell is this person who came out of no where w/ no valid credentials or experience or real job training? and w/ in 6 months he is turning our country upside down w/ such radical socialist plans.
it is happening so fast and that is not fast enough for him.
How many of the mega page bills were even read, cover to cover before getting passed on for someone else to sign? Many years ago I read about collapse of ancient civilizations and wondered how they could possibly collapse as rapidly as scientists claimed. Now I stand as witness to a collapse of a civilization by government grab for power and spineless politicos holding on to their chairs with a death grip.
285![]() |
SasquatchOnSteroids Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:25:42pm |
re: #270 victor_yugo
As long as you are able to unplug your television from the power outlet, you are not her captive audience.
Can I unplug from DC.
That would be nice.
286![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:25:56pm |
re: #274 albusteve
some people live inside the internet, born and raised there...no wives or children...isolated in a cyber world that can mean whatever you want it to...reality is confused with fantasy
Indeed. When I read that I was reminded of a contractor I've spoken with recently that shares many of the same fears I have with the current administration. The last thing we want is for the economy to fail since we depend on working for a living but we are far from optimistic with the direction in which we are headed.
287![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:26:00pm |
re: #280 JacksonTn
More on Obama and the SEIU ... they own him ...
[Link: www.chicagotribune.com...]
what a cluster fuck
288![]() |
NY Nana Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:27:57pm |
re: #260 livefreeor die
Thank you for posting that video.
You are most welcome. We were living in my native Boston, and JFK was my first vote. The legal age was 21 back then. My husband was in the US Army, stationed at the now-defunct Boston Army Base. I was in my ninth month of my first pregnancy, and was weeping. I could not stop. My parents zt"l came over as they were worried about me. They took us for a ride, thinking that I would calm down...downtown Boston was empty. All the department stores were closed, and in one window of each was a painting or official photo of President Kennedy, on an easel, and draped with black crepe.
My Mum was weeping with me at that point. We went back to their home, and I managed to calm down, mainly for my Mum.
I was glued to the TV for the next few days. I saw still in shock. I dated everything post-November 22, 1962...until September 11, 2001.
Being in Boston for the assassination and NY for the day that has never ended for a lot of us?
289![]() |
Capitalistincharge Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:28:24pm |
re: #154 Killgore Trout
Jeez, KT, where do you get this stuff...
290![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:30:10pm |
re: #287 albusteve
what a cluster fuck
Andy Stern the SEIU leader:
Born the son of a lawyer in West Orange, New Jersey, Stern was a student leftist in the 1960s. He began college as a business major at the Wharton School of Business but ultimately graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a B.A. in education and urban planning in 1971.[7][8] After graduation he spent a time traveling in Europe before he began his career as a welfare case officer and member of the Service Employees International Union ("SEIU") in 1973, eventually being elected president of his Pennsylvania local.[9] In 1980, he was elected to the union's executive board, and in 1984 the union's then-president Sweeney put him in charge of its organizing efforts.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
291![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:30:10pm |
re: #286 Gus 802
Indeed. When I read that I was reminded of a contractor I've spoken with recently that shares many of the same fears I have with the current administration. The last thing we want is for the economy to fail since we depend on working for a living but we are far from optimistic with the direction in which we are headed.
I've lost 40% of my stock value...screeching I want the economy to fail out of ODS is so disingenuous it reeks of hypocricy...people blab that out with no thought whatsoever...and those same droolers are taking the hit too...it's sureal
294![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:31:58pm |
re: #253 JacksonTn
SE ... the part of your post in bold above ... that right there shows how you cannot see the truth about progessives/democrats/socialists party ... you think they are sweet angels? ... oh, yeah, Karl Rove was the "first" person to ever do anything like that ... swirl ...
Hi, Jackson: "Sweet angels"? Where on earth did I say that?
Believe it or not, I do research before I post here. Google has approximately 14,700 hits for "cheerleading for defeat," and though I did not take time to read all 14,700 links, I did read quite a few and scanned a lot of others.
In those I read, I did not find a single example of the phrase being used before Karl Rove was appointed as President Bush's senior advisor and deputy chief of staff.
Also, I did not find a single example of the phrase being used by a Democrat to criticize a Republican.
If you can give me a link showing that "cheerleading for defeat" is really a bipartisan thing, and that the phrase was used before Karl Rove's time, I will either send you a batch of brownies or make a modest donation to the charity of your choice. How can you refuse a deal like that? :)
295![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:32:35pm |
re: #291 albusteve
I've lost 40% of my stock value...screeching I want the economy to fail out of ODS is so disingenuous it reeks of hypocricy...people blab that out with no thought whatsoever...and those same droolers are taking the hit too...it's sureal
40% is a lot of money. On average I've heard around 50%.
The "failure" angle has become the meme of the left. Another meme is the cliche of "the Party of No." When you hear that make sure you have your hip waders on. ;)
296![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:32:36pm |
re: #286 Gus 802
Indeed. When I read that I was reminded of a contractor I've spoken with recently that shares many of the same fears I have with the current administration. The last thing we want is for the economy to fail since we depend on working for a living but we are far from optimistic with the direction in which we are headed.
I have yet to meet someone that works for a living cheering for the economy to tank, we dont wake up and go wouldnt it be great to lose my house and car.
But I do hear liberal moonbats cheering for me to get up and work to pay for them to sit at home and watch Oprah.
Earning anything seems to be a concept that escapes them.
298![]() |
M. Bensson-Levi Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:34:46pm |
re: #266 victor_yugo
... there are some lingering issues to deal with.
There always are, but as long as there are no children involved (you didn't mention) it all amounts to nothing, just something to do until 'til there are no more lingering issues. Take it from me, I'm a wise Latina wom... wait a minute. Maybe not! I'm a white male...but I'm not a judge (except for Bourbon, and horse flesh...grilled rare, not on the hoof), so I guess it's OK.
Anyway, "this too will pass..." Bill Clinton, referring to his kidney stones.
299![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:34:49pm |
re: #295 Gus 802
40% is a lot of money. On average I've heard around 50%.
The "failure" angle has become the meme of the left. Another meme is the cliche of "the Party of No." When you hear that make sure you have your hip waders on. ;)
and it's shameful that otherwise respectable posters bray that crap
300![]() |
NY Nana Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:35:23pm |
re: #293 albusteve
you da bomb!...just a reminder
Better watch out! I 'splode about every 15 minutes. ;)
301![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:35:36pm |
re: #296 DEZes
I have yet to meet someone that works for a living cheering for the economy to tank, we dont wake up and go wouldnt it be great to lose my house and car.
But I do hear liberal moonbats cheering for me to get up and work to pay for them to sit at home and watch Oprah.
Earning anything seems to be a concept that escapes them.
To either sit at home or jump from one program to another. Or from one college major to another. I know someone that has done a combination of these and still isn't on track and is over 50. She still complains when some programs are cut from time to time. But what gets me is that after all of these years the state and Federal government has been providing her with these avenues yet it never ends.
302![]() |
JacksonTn Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:36:03pm |
re: #294 ShanghaiEd
Hi, Jackson: "Sweet angels"? Where on earth did I say that?
Believe it or not, I do research before I post here. Google has approximately 14,700 hits for "cheerleading for defeat," and though I did not take time to read all 14,700 links, I did read quite a few and scanned a lot of others.
In those I read, I did not find a single example of the phrase being used before Karl Rove was appointed as President Bush's senior advisor and deputy chief of staff.
Also, I did not find a single example of the phrase being used by a Democrat to criticize a Republican.
If you can give me a link showing that "cheerleading for defeat" is really a bipartisan thing, and that the phrase was used before Karl Rove's time, I will either send you a batch of brownies or make a modest donation to the charity of your choice. How can you refuse a deal like that? :)
SE ... depends on the definition of "is" is ... you swirl ... you always pick apart words ... no matter how small ... but then "just words" ...
"cheerleading for defeat" I guess is a term used to described Karl Rove ... I have never heard it before ... I assure you democrats have some really cool phrases of their own ...
You say you are not pro-Obama but you could have fooled me ...
303![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:36:43pm |
re: #294 ShanghaiEd
I want BO defeated...I want BO to fail...ad that to your links
304![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:37:32pm |
re: #299 albusteve
and it's shameful that otherwise respectable posters bray that crap
Almost daily. Then when I get to read the "you people" part -- like we are some kind of collective or something.
305![]() |
JacksonTn Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:37:36pm |
re: #290 Gus 802
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
Gus802 ... I have posted here before about a union guy in my face so close I could fell his spit on ... yep ... nice SEIU guy ...
306![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:37:39pm |
307![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:38:02pm |
re: #279 albusteve
all the liberals went poof!...predictable
Steve: Please check the wording of your original question, before you go "poof." You asked for responses from liberals who are BO supporters. You're not talking to me.
308![]() |
albusteve Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:39:09pm |
re: #307 ShanghaiEd
Steve: Please check the wording of your original question, before you go "poof." You asked for responses from liberals who are BO supporters. You're not talking to me.
I don't poof read...I post, therefore I am
309![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:40:18pm |
re: #305 JacksonTn
Gus802 ... I have posted here before about a union guy in my face so close I could fell his spit on ... yep ... nice SEIU guy ...
Sounds right. Nothing surprising considering most government workers are either SEIU or AFSCME. Government is the "growth industry [sic]" under Obama.
310![]() |
nyc redneck Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:41:09pm |
re: #284 Perplexed
How many of the mega page bills were even read, cover to cover before getting passed on for someone else to sign? Many years ago I read about collapse of ancient civilizations and wondered how they could possibly collapse as rapidly as scientists claimed. Now I stand as witness to a collapse of a civilization by government grab for power and spineless politicos holding on to their chairs with a death grip.
we need to get the word out abt these grifters who out for power and gain at all costs. they know that the public would reject them if the truth was known.
so they are devious. look how they all tack right when they seek to get elected or approved for office. look at soto distancing herself from herself. LOL look at o emitting campaign type nebulous platitudes abt. health care. these bums are hiding who they really are even as they work their mischief.
the answer is educating the public which is becoming more conservative. and going after the libs and exposing them w/ the same enthusiasm they have in steam rolling us.
312![]() |
hotel_2_oscar Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:42:13pm |
I remember Cronkite and the space program from the early Mercury days (watching the MR flights from Blessed Sacrament)...he was a great cheerleader and the memories of the US' successes are intertwined with his voice and its interest and enthusiasm...
As for the rest of it...well, as the saying goes, if you can't speak well of the dead, don't speak at all...
{crickets}
That being said. RIP.
KBO
313![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:42:58pm |
re: #301 Gus 802
To either sit at home or jump from one program to another. Or from one college major to another. I know someone that has done a combination of these and still isn't on track and is over 50. She still complains when some programs are cut from time to time. But what gets me is that after all of these years the state and Federal government has been providing her with these avenues yet it never ends.
Its the you owe me attitude, and no matter how much help they receive, its not enough, they dont look at themselves as not doing enough as much as the people who get up and bust their ass.
You and me are not just giving them everything they need to be total leaches, they see the working men and women as the problem.
They latch on and wanna bleed a nation dry, and man do they squeal when you pull em off.
315![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:47:49pm |
re: #313 DEZes
Its the you owe me attitude, and no matter how much help they receive, its not enough, they dont look at themselves as not doing enough as much as the people who get up and bust their ass.
You and me are not just giving them everything they need to be total leaches, they see the working men and women as the problem.
They latch on and wanna bleed a nation dry, and man do they squeal when you pull em off.
Right. It's almost a lifestyle -- if you can call it that. It evolved from the 60s mentality of victimhood, the disenfranchisement meme, the isms. So along the way they are looking for any excuse to find these said problems. They'll take a class in a certain industry like say engineer. Then they observe some off the wall injustice and come up with another excuse to quit: i.e. "oh I decided to change my major because they don't like ___ in the engineering field." So they start some other route payed by some grant or another only to find that they find something wrong yet again. It become like they say, a viscous cycle.
317![]() |
Charles Johnson Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:49:17pm |
If you're a big enough asshole when you defy my rule about mean-spirited comments, I'll just block your account.
318![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:50:04pm |
re: #308 albusteve
I don't poof read...I post, therefore I am
Proofing is in the past-- he is of the "NOW".
319![]() |
Steffan Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:50:32pm |
re: #27 albusteve
the VC were virtually wiped out due to Tet...I don't get it
True. However, the perception here in the Land of the Round Doorknobs was that they were winning. The live TV shots of American soldiers firing into the embassy compound didn't help.
When LBJ heard Cronkite say that we were losing the war, he knew it was over. Uncle Walter, a true successor of Edward R. Murrow, enjoyed a moral authority that no one else ever had or ever will -- Rather only dreamed of having that kind of authority.
320![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:50:35pm |
This an ironic hoot. Regarding Andy Stern of SEIU.
SEIU president Andy Stern has been bashing Bank of America - the same bank that gave union big loan
For the past few months, Andy Stern, president of the powerful Service Employees International Union, has railed against the government's $45 billion Bank of America bailout. He has condemned the bank for lavish bonuses, for exploiting millions of mortgage and credit card customers, and for mistreating its low-level workers.
SEIU's Change to Win labor coalition even led a "Just Vote No" shareholder revolt Wednesday at the bank's annual meeting in Charlotte, N.C., at which Ken Lewis was ousted as bank chairman but kept on as CEO. But guess what? Despite all the public fanfare, Stern has been quietly doing big business with Bank of America.
Last year, his union borrowed $10 million from the bank, SEIU's financial report shows. That loan brought the union's total debt with Bank of America to $87.7 million.
Ken Lewis, in other words, is SEIU's main creditor. And that's not the only surprise in the report. SEIU's other big lender last year - to the tune of $15 million - was Amalgamated Bank. That's the institution owned by UNITE HERE, a rival union that represents clothing, hotel, restaurant and laundry workers.
322![]() |
jaunte Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:51:31pm |
Cheerleading, not by Karl Rove.
"Catholic influence in early cold war politics was not limite to Hoover's FBI witch-hunts or cheerleading for "tail-gunner Joe" McCarthy."
(pg84)
America’s Miracle Man in Vietnam: Ngo Dinh Diem, Religion, Race, and U.S. Intervention in Southeast Asia
Seth Jacobs, assistant professor, history, Boston College
[Link: www.amazon.com...]
323![]() |
NY Nana Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:51:59pm |
324![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:52:02pm |
re: #302 JacksonTn
SE ... depends on the definition of "is" is ... you swirl ... you always pick apart words ... no matter how small ... but then "just words" ...
"cheerleading for defeat" I guess is a term used to described Karl Rove ... I have never heard it before ... I assure you democrats have some really cool phrases of their own ...
You say you are not pro-Obama but you could have fooled me ...
Unfortunately, on a comment board, words are all we've got. I try to hold people accountable for what they say, and they do me the same favor. I don't see where "swirling" fits in at all.
You also wrongly assume I'm a Democrat, by the way. I'm an Independent. If you're interested in how I got that way, I'll go on my rant for you about how the Democrats have helped ruin the country. There's much profanity in it, but I can filter it for a family audience if need be.
In the meantime, my offer to charity still stands. Brownies, too. Your choice. Fair enough?
327![]() |
dkorta Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:53:28pm |
Even if Walter Cronkite would have had perfect 20/20 hindsight and have reported the outcome of the Tet offensive perfectly accurately, I doubt that it would have made much difference to the outcome of the war. It would have been a fart in the hurricane of anti-war sentiment that was being stoked at the time.
As it was, the public was growing cynical about body counts and military optimism about the war in general. In only a few short years the stories swung from the heroic efforts of Green Beret teams defending remote outposts to the Mai Lai atrocities. I do not think Walter Cronkite was solely responsible for that.
328![]() |
JacksonTn Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:53:47pm |
re: #324 ShanghaiEd
Unfortunately, on a comment board, words are all we've got. I try to hold people accountable for what they say, and they do me the same favor. I don't see where "swirling" fits in at all.
You also wrongly assume I'm a Democrat, by the way. I'm an Independent. If you're interested in how I got that way, I'll go on my rant for you about how the Democrats have helped ruin the country. There's much profanity in it, but I can filter it for a family audience if need be.
In the meantime, my offer to charity still stands. Brownies, too. Your choice. Fair enough?
SE ... I do not assume you are a democrat ... IMO you do seem to come to defense of Obama ... who knows why ... I make great brownies all the time and contribute to many charities ... but thanks anyway ...
329![]() |
DEZes Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:55:07pm |
re: #326 calcajun
NO POOFTERS!/
"No poofs, no poofs."
As a chant that stinks.
I missed the poofs, but stinky did not.
I am gonna bail, Lizards, thanks for the company.
331![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:55:54pm |
re: #329 DEZes
"No poofs, no poofs."
As a chant that stinks.
I missed the poofs, but stinky did not.
I am gonna bail, Lizards, thanks for the company.
Have a good one DEZ.
332![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:56:54pm |
re: #327 dkorta
No-- he, and all other broadcasters bear responsibility for shaping public opinion -- either deliberately or inadvertently. The Pentagon, too, was wrong for allowing the press as much access as had been given. But, it was a mistake for Cronkite to make the statement which he did and for him to never acknowledge that he misspoke. It did have consequences as LBJ decided not to run again because Cronkite was telling people the war was unwinnable.
333![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 7:59:15pm |
re: #322 jaunte
Cheerleading, not by Karl Rove.
"Catholic influence in early cold war politics was not limite to Hoover's FBI witch-hunts or cheerleading for "tail-gunner Joe" McCarthy."
(pg84)
America’s Miracle Man in Vietnam: Ngo Dinh Diem, Religion, Race, and U.S. Intervention in Southeast Asia
Seth Jacobs, assistant professor, history, Boston College
[Link: www.amazon.com...]
"Cheerleading for defeat," is the phrase under discussion, jaunte.
I don't doubt that people of all persuasions use just plain "cheerleading" for a metaphor.
334![]() |
jaunte Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:01:57pm |
re: #333 ShanghaiEd
Ok, those specific 3 words, post Karl Rove, democrat criticizing a republican.
It's a pretty safe bet that it didn't happen!
336![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:03:26pm |
re: #332 calcajun
No-- he, and all other broadcasters bear responsibility for shaping public opinion -- either deliberately or inadvertently. The Pentagon, too, was wrong for allowing the press as much access as had been given. But, it was a mistake for Cronkite to make the statement which he did and for him to never acknowledge that he misspoke. It did have consequences as LBJ decided not to run again because Cronkite was telling people the war was unwinnable.
It shows how the impact of one broadcaster has changed over time. At the time Walter Cronkite's opinion came to hold a lot of sway. There were other well known newsmen at the time that carried a lesser sway. The medium of course wasn't as vast and varied as we have today.
No one news person has that kind of power today because of the larger market. So today if a news reporter said "the war is lost" it would be either largely ignored or merely subjected to public or inter news criticism. Thus it was a reflection of the era.
337![]() |
itellu3times Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:03:29pm |
oscar meyer, robert mcnamara, walter cronkite
339![]() |
Gus Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:06:50pm |
re: #337 itellu3times
oscar meyer, robert mcnamara, walter cronkite
"But the big story tonight is about Michael Jackson's estate..."
//
341![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:10:23pm |
re: #328 JacksonTn
SE ... I do not assume you are a democrat ...
Oops. My mistake. Your post #302 said "I assure you Democrats have some phrases..." and my aging eyes read it as "I assume you Democrats have some phrases..." Sorry about that.
...IMO you do seem to come to defense of Obama ... who knows why ...
Huh? If you can show me a link where I've said anything positive about Obama personally, as opposed to the respect I believe is due to the office of the presidency in general, my offer of a charity donation in your name still holds. I really have no idea where you get that perception.
342![]() |
dkorta Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:16:32pm |
re: #332 calcajun
No-- he, and all other broadcasters bear responsibility for shaping public opinion -- either deliberately or inadvertently. The Pentagon, too, was wrong for allowing the press as much access as had been given. But, it was a mistake for Cronkite to make the statement which he did and for him to never acknowledge that he misspoke. It did have consequences as LBJ decided not to run again because Cronkite was telling people the war was unwinnable.
Some people now think the war was winnable because the communists said as much after the fact. I think they are rubbing salt into the wound.
I think the war was potentially unwinnable for a number of reasons:
1. Viet Nam has a border with China. As we all know, we thought N Korea was defeated until a million Chinese "volunteers" came pouring across the Yalu. Even tho China and Viet Nam have had enmities for centuries, I think the possibility of another "volunteer" effort by the Chinese was entirely plausible.
2. Unlike N Korea, Viet Nam's left flank is uncovered. That's thousands of miles of jungle which would have been difficult to surveil even with our current technology.
3. The tactics used in Nam were reckless and got a lot of good men killed unnecessarily. Rather than choppering more and more forces into a meat-grinder, stealth, patience, and counter guerilla strategies were proven more effective but never widely implemented.
Yes, Cronkite's assessment of Tet was wrong. But there was a hell of a lot more than Tet going on.
343![]() |
AuntAcid Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:17:39pm |
Dead at 92 - damn our health care system - if only...
344![]() |
Throbert McGee Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:18:57pm |
345![]() |
calcajun Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:19:58pm |
Sorry--watching one of the better Scifi shows right now-- Eureka. Talk later.
346![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:20:40pm |
re: #334 jaunte
Ok, those specific 3 words, post Karl Rove, democrat criticizing a republican.
It's a pretty safe bet that it didn't happen!
That's not what I said, jaunte. Not those three terms in a search. There are two different issues here:
1. Jackson said the phrase "cheerleading for defeat" was in use before Karl
Rove's time. I searched "cheerleading for defeat," and looked for uses before the year 2000, when Karl Rove came into power.
2. Jackson said that Democrats and Republicans accuse each other of "cheerleading for defeat," and I said that the only uses I could find were Republicans using the term against Democrats, falsely claiming they want the U.S. to lose in Afghanistan and/or Iraq.
If you find I'm wrong, I welcome correcting myself. In front of God and everybody. :)
347![]() |
SteveRogers Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:20:45pm |
re: #345 calcajun
Sorry--watching one of the better Scifi shows right now-- Eureka. Talk later.
Eureka rocks!
348![]() |
MrPaulRevere Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:21:37pm |
Blaming Cronkite for the loss of Vietnam is simply wrong. Did Mr. Cronkite command any armies?
349![]() |
jaunte Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:22:20pm |
re: #346 ShanghaiEd
That's clear. I can't promise you that I'll spend much time on it, though.
350![]() |
JacksonTn Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:25:00pm |
re: #346 ShanghaiEd
That's not what I said, jaunte. Not those three terms in a search. There are two different issues here:
1. Jackson said the phrase "cheerleading for defeat" was in use before Karl
Rove's time. I searched "cheerleading for defeat," and looked for uses before the year 2000, when Karl Rove came into power.2. Jackson said that Democrats and Republicans accuse each other of "cheerleading for defeat," and I said that the only uses I could find were Republicans using the term against Democrats, falsely claiming they want the U.S. to lose in Afghanistan and/or Iraq.
If you find I'm wrong, I welcome correcting myself. In front of God and everybody. :)
SE ... you are full of crap ... I said I never even heard the term before ... you are really something else ... done with this conversation ...
351![]() |
realwest Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:32:53pm |
re: #348 MrPaulRevere
With respect MrPaulRevere, Walter Cronkite commanded the biggest army of the entire Vietnam War: the US media and Public Opinon. While Mr. Cronkite was advising Mr. and Mrs. America that the Tet Offensive was a dramatic, huge loss for the South Vietnamese and the United States, the North Vietnemese were indeed despondent over it's utter failure from the communists' perspective.
Indeed,
In total, approximately 85,000–100,000 communist troops had participated in the initial onslaught and in the follow-up phases. Overall, during the "Border Battles" of 1967 and the nine-month winter-spring campaign, 45,267 communist troops had been killed in action
This dramatically affected the support for the war by the American Public. [Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
I don't put Mr. Cronkite in anything like the same category as Mr. McNamara; his erroneous reporting was just that.
RIP Walter Cronkite.
352![]() |
Ward Cleaver Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:34:49pm |
Little-known fact: Cronkite was a Volvo racer, back in the late '50s:
News man, Volvo racer Walter Cronkite dies at 92
Former CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite has passed away at 92. Although Cronkite was primarily known for his coverage of the JFK assassination, moon landing and the Vietnam war, he also enjoyed success in endurance racing with teammate and Volvo of Long Island dealer Art Riley.
When Riley died earlier this year at 93, his obit briefly mentions Cronkite's involvement with the team and its successes behind the wheel of a Volvo PV444. The team campaigned and won races at Lime Rock's "Little LeMans" in 1957, '58 and '61. Cronkite was the only finisher in a five-car team one year, taking a B-division win and placing third overall. The two also teamed up to compete in the Trans-Canada rally...
353![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:37:18pm |
re: #350 JacksonTn
SE ... you are full of crap ... I said I never even heard the term before ... you are really something else ... done with this conversation ...
No, I'm operating in good faith here, Jackson. I was only going by what you said in your #253:
SE ... the part of your post in bold above ... that right there shows how you cannot see the truth about progessives/democrats/socialists party ... you think they are sweet angels? ... oh, yeah, Karl Rove was the "first" person to ever do anything like that ... swirl ...
I interpreted that to mean two things: (1) Democrats do that too, and (2) the term was in use before Karl Rove's time.
Sorry if I misinterpreted. What did you intend to say?
354![]() |
MrPaulRevere Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:37:52pm |
re: #351 realwest
He was a controversial figure RW, no question about it.
355![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:41:21pm |
re: #349 jaunte
That's clear. I can't promise you that I'll spend much time on it, though.
Fair enough, jaunte. I appreciate your reply, though.
356![]() |
dkorta Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:43:27pm |
re: #351 realwest
With respect MrPaulRevere, Walter Cronkite commanded the biggest army of the entire Vietnam War: the US media and Public Opinon. While Mr. Cronkite was advising Mr. and Mrs. America that the Tet Offensive was a dramatic, huge loss for the South Vietnamese and the United States, the North Vietnemese were indeed despondent over it's utter failure from the communists' perspective.
Indeed,
This dramatically affected the support for the war by the American Public. [Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
I don't put Mr. Cronkite in anything like the same category as Mr. McNamara; his erroneous reporting was just that.RIP Walter Cronkite.
But at the time, no one knew the North Vietnamese perspective. The Tet coverage made it look like we had no control over what was going on over there. The North Vietnamese calculated the effect the offensive would have on the American public and were prepared to take the casualties to achieve their objective, which was getting a leg up in the propaganda war.
Again, Cronkite was wrong in his assessment of Tet, but I don't think he was deliberately trying to skew the facts.
357![]() |
realwest Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:43:52pm |
re: #31 zombie
Some of us can't forget the Vietnam War. It's that simple.
But you can't judge a person's life or the value of that person's life to society by one or two mistakes no matter how big they were. He was - in his prime - an extremely brave man and the very definition of the phrase "intrepid reporter." So again I say,
RIP Walter Cronkite.
358![]() |
realwest Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:47:26pm |
re: #356 dkorta
I NEVER suggested he was trying to skew the facts. Go read the link I posted from wikipedia; the North Vietnamese were shocked - and delighted - by the American reaction to Tet. They never calculated that losing over half of their men - DEAD - not including wounded, was somehow going to change American Public Opinion to being against the war.
359![]() |
swamprat Fri, Jul 17, 2009 8:51:40pm |
360![]() |
dkorta Fri, Jul 17, 2009 9:02:51pm |
re: #358 realwest
I NEVER suggested he was trying to skew the facts. Go read the link I posted from wikipedia; the North Vietnamese were shocked - and delighted - by the American reaction to Tet. They never calculated that losing over half of their men - DEAD - not including wounded, was somehow going to change American Public Opinion to being against the war.
re: #358 realwest
OK, he wasn't trying to "skew" the facts. He didn't know what they were, nor did anyone else at the time.
The Tet offensive was a psychological victory for the North Vietnamese because the official US military rhetoric at the time was that the VC were on their knees.
Whether the VC intentionally planned Tet purely for a psyops advantage, I do not know. I thought I read that somewhere but might be mistaken.
361![]() |
ShanghaiEd Fri, Jul 17, 2009 9:32:01pm |
re: #268 LGoPs
Ed - I don't know where to begin and I can't hang around long so I'll be brief. your comment on double standards is a hot button with me, mainly because for most of my life what I've seen is a relentless liberal onslaught on everything that I beleive in, things that my parents and I escaped when we emigrated to America from a communist country.
The bottom line is that rather than a double standard there is a single standard in America. And that standard is that liberals control everything. The media, the courts, education, the governement. And they screech like banshees at the few outlets that conservatives still maintain - Talk Radio, Fox news, part of the internet.
The gulf between our viewpoints is so wide I can't see across it.
LGoPs, I wasn't ignoring your thoughtful and heartfelt note; I just now saw it.
I think your last line states the problem today in a nutshell, and I agree with you 100%.
There's always been a gap in political ideologies, but I can't recall a point in my lifetime when it's been as bad as today. I know any number of honest, well-intentioned people on the "left" who have felt their identities and beliefs under a "relentless onslaught" of victories by the Religious Right and conservatism in general. Viewpoint means everything.
The difference, I think, is that there are a handful of political professionals who have spent their careers widening that gulf between viewpoints, unnecessarily and on purpose, in order to win elections, and oblivious or uncaring of the damage they do to the social fabric in the process.
The most visible one I know of is Karl Rove. The second most visible was one of his mentors, Lee Atwater. There's an award-winning documentary about Atwater's life and achievements: "Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story," that I highly recommend. At the end of his life, Atwater renounced what he had done, but I don't think that had any impact on Rove.
I'm not saying that Rove and Atwater are the only devious, spinning bad guys in politics, but they were so much more skillful than their Democratic opponents that they almost brought into being the "permanent Republican majority" that was their goal all along.
They did that, in large part, by "widening the gap": pushing hot-button issues such as race, gender, and religion to the exclusion of more substantive challenges. And we are all poorer for it, I think.
The only bright spot in that regard, to me, is that there are places like LGF where we can talk to our "enemies" up close and divide the realities from the stereotypes. Narrowing the gap, one post at a time. I'm glad I found it.
Thanks for listening.
364![]() |
jvic Fri, Jul 17, 2009 11:13:24pm |
re: #361 ShanghaiEd
The difference, I think, is that there are a handful of political professionals who have spent their careers widening that gulf between viewpoints, unnecessarily and on purpose, in order to win elections, and oblivious or uncaring of the damage they do to the social fabric in the process.
Not just widening the gap, but debasing the terms and vocabulary of discourse.
Perhaps the Carville/Matalin class of political operators has a vested interest in changing how the game is played (in order to make it both more specialized and tactically more manageable).
The most visible one I know of is Karl Rove. The second most visible was one of his mentors, Lee Atwater...
Atwater's signature achievement was the 1988 campaign. Maybe I didn't hear the dog whistles, but GHW Bush didn't run as a member of the theocratic right.
Iirc Atwater coined the term 'big tent'. I suspect he would have resisted the GOP's drift to the point at which the Reagan Democrats, moderates and libertarians left. In contrast, I suspect that history will say that Rove won his battles at the expense of the larger war.
374![]() |
Charles Johnson Sat, Jul 18, 2009 8:22:38am |
Is there something unclear about this statement?
Most LGF readers don't need to be told this, but please note that any mean-spirited comments about Cronkite will be deleted. If you can't restrain yourself from venting anger, do it somewhere else.
375![]() |
samsgran1948 Sat, Jul 18, 2009 8:28:02am |
I grew up with Cronkite, and not just on TV. He made a whole series of films about history that were shown in practically every classroom in America in the late Fifties. These films recreated various episodes of American history, and Cronkite did man-on-the-street reporting, interviewing all the major characters to ask why and how they were doing what they were doing. It was a very effective way to teach history.
Unfortunately, though, once I discovered how he single handedly lost the Tet Offensive, it tainted his every word and action in my mind. If he lied about that, what else did he lie about? How could he be trusted on anything else?
376![]() |
Charles Johnson Sat, Jul 18, 2009 8:35:35am |
It's an absurd exaggeration to claim that Cronkite "single handedly lost the Tet offensive." By that point, American opinion had turned drastically against the war. Cronkite's editorial was one more straw on the camel's back, nothing more.
377![]() |
leftover54 Sat, Jul 18, 2009 9:08:03am |
One man, one opinion. A soothing voice,a familiar avuncular persona but with a sir name that sounded like 'concrete', 'We' sat every evening at 5pm, in front of the 'boob tube' and willingly absorbed everything the guy said. Who's 'fault' was that ? I can't 'hate' the man without hating 'us'. As dearly as I love my own uncles, I have to say, I spent more time visiting with and listening to 'Uncle Walter' than I did any of them. And I wouldn't have 'hated' any of them if they had been 'anti-war' (all WWII vets BTW). A celluloid member of the family, he isn't in any of our photo albums (remember them ?). Maybe a sad commentary but 'that's the way it was'.
Fond memories...
RIP 'Uncle Walter'.
**Wow. I just remembered the show 'The 20th Century'. Along with 'Lassie', 'Bonanza' and 'Combat', it was a fav. of mine. Great memory rush !
378![]() |
poteen Sat, Jul 18, 2009 9:26:30am |
He gave his opinion in a newscast. Common today, not so common then but not unheard of and he wasn't the only one.
His mistake was underestimating his own inordinate effect on public opinion.
A lesson learned that today's "anchors" use and abuse repeatedly.
A lesson still not learned by enough of that American public.
His life's work adds up to more than a net plus.
We need more like him in today's newsrooms.
379![]() |
PSGInfinity Sat, Jul 18, 2009 9:49:21am |
I watched Walter on the news when I was a kid. When he said "And that's the way it is..." we believed him. I guess that's what I miss most - having that person you could just trust, giving it to you straight...
380![]() |
leftover54 Sat, Jul 18, 2009 12:40:31pm |
re: #379 PSGInfinity
Yeah but he did editorialize.One of his opinions, which he shared with the American public,was that the war ('Nam) was a "stalemate" and could be ended only by negotiation.
Also, I think it was Pres. Johnson who supposedly said (after watching Walter on TV one evening) ' if I lost Walter, I've lost middle America' or something close to that. So, pretty damn influential editorializing too !
Watching/hearing/reading all this going on, is it any wonder the enemy was in no hurry to surrender - even after having 1/2 their military wiped out during Tet ?
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake" and "Victory belongs to the most persevering" (Napoleon) became their strategy. My point being that he didn't just 'give the facts'.
You may be thinking of Sgt. Joe Friday ??
:-)
381![]() |
leftover54 Sat, Jul 18, 2009 1:40:13pm |
I just watched the video embedded above. Cute Katies time line was a tad off, no ? Her 'we needed heros' type comment usually came post 'Watergate'. IIRC, we had plenty of hero's by '69 - but these astronauts rose to the top of the heap that day. Of course her and I probably have different ideas as to who and what defined a 'hero' although we did agree here. I guess that's a nice thing. I'll leave it at that !
382![]() |
ShanghaiEd Sat, Jul 18, 2009 1:42:22pm |
re: #364 jvic
In contrast, I suspect that history will say that Rove won his battles at the expense of the larger war.
Well said, jvic. Thanks for the perspective.
383![]() |
LGoPs Sat, Jul 18, 2009 2:41:52pm |
re: #361 ShanghaiEd
The only bright spot in that regard, to me, is that there are places like LGF where we can talk to our "enemies" up close and divide the realities from the stereotypes. Narrowing the gap, one post at a time. I'm glad I found it.
Thanks for listening.
I hear what you said and while I don't agree with the characterization of Rove and Atwater I agree with you on your last point Ed.
384![]() |
ShanghaiEd Sat, Jul 18, 2009 2:45:46pm |
re: #383 LGoPs
I hear what you said and while I don't agree with the characterization of Rove and Atwater I agree with you on your last point Ed.
I appreciate that. Always enjoy talking with you here.
385![]() |
ShanghaiEd Sat, Jul 18, 2009 2:48:59pm |
This was a surprise to me. Here's what Cronkite's supposedly "defeatist" commentary...and he did clearly label it as a commentary...actually said (emphasis mine):
...To say that we are closer to victory today is to believe, in the face of the evidence, the optimists who have been wrong in the past. To suggest we are on the edge of defeat is to yield to unreasonable pessimism. To say that we are mired in stalemate seems the only realistic, yet unsatisfactory, conclusion. On the off chance that military and political analysts are right, in the next few months we must test the enemy's intentions, in case this is indeed his last big gasp before negotiations.
386![]() |
scrad Sat, Jul 18, 2009 4:35:24pm |
The headlines say "Katie Curic recalls predecessor, Walter Cronkite"
Walter was not HER "predecessor". He was Dan Rathers predecessor and Dan was clueless.
Dan was HER 'predecessor'. Period. She probably has no idea who Walter was in the pre Vietnam and post vietnam era. None, zero , nil. Other than his name, she has no clue.
So, what gives her any right to 'discuss' Walter? She didn't learn a damn thing from him. Her mentor was Dan (false but accurate) Rather.
This is B.S.
387![]() |
ShanghaiEd Sat, Jul 18, 2009 5:12:05pm |
re: #386 scrad
The headlines say "Katie Curic recalls predecessor, Walter Cronkite"
Walter was not HER "predecessor". He was Dan Rathers predecessor and Dan was clueless.
Dan was HER 'predecessor'. Period. She probably has no idea who Walter was in the pre Vietnam and post vietnam era. None, zero , nil. Other than his name, she has no clue.
So, what gives her any right to 'discuss' Walter? She didn't learn a damn thing from him. Her mentor was Dan (false but accurate) Rather.
This is B.S.
scrad, I checked several dictionaries on this and it looks like, alas, Couric is correct. Predecessor is "a person who served before." No time frame implied.
If she had said Cronkite was her immediate predecessor, that would be B.S.
388![]() |
JEA62 Sat, Jul 18, 2009 6:51:20pm |
When Cronkite editorialized he let the viewers know that's what he was doing. Nowadays reporters on the right AND left editorialize without saying it all the damn time. Old school also didn't ignore facts that didn't fit in with what they were reporting - they reported facts, period. I'm so damn sick of the left and right conveniently leaving out things that don't agree with their POV.
Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...
Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.
Channeling Confucius
The Purity Crusade Continues: Another big night for the Tea Party movement – and another blow to the Senate
1 hour, 8 minutes ago
Views: 52 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
I AM BREITBART!
Kansas Pastor Calls on U.S. Government to Kill LGBT People
35 minutes ago
Views: 34 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Ascher
Robert Mugabe Asked to Be UN 'Leader for Tourism'
34 minutes ago
Views: 30 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Randall Gross
Mitt Romney: Little to Like: DNC Spoofs Romney Facebook Timeline
2 hours, 49 minutes ago
Views: 102 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Randall Gross
New Documentary Explores N.J. Classroom Conflict Over Teacher/Preacher
4 hours, 2 minutes ago
Views: 120 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
Randall Gross
Charles Taylor Sentenced to 50 Years for War Crimes
4 hours, 28 minutes ago
Views: 80 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
thecommodore
Romney Releases His Birth Certificate on the Day of His Donald Trump Fundraiser
13 hours, 24 minutes ago
Views: 840 • Comments: 17
Tweets: 118 • Rating: 11
STLActivist
Former Breitbart Loyalists Now Pander to Glenn Beck
14 hours, 1 minute ago
Views: 671 • Comments: 4
Tweets: 65 • Rating: 6
researchok
The Struggle to Succeed Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani
7 hours, 9 minutes ago
Views: 71 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
researchok
Even in Kentucky, Coal Industry Is Under Siege
7 hours, 7 minutes ago
Views: 102 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Channeling Confucius
The 7 Most Terrifying Archaeological Discoveries
7 minutes ago
Views: 11 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Aigle
Ha'aretz, Lost in Translation
1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Views: 52 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Randall Gross
Government Employment Drops Under Obama, but Media Run With Romney Myth Anyway
2 hours, 53 minutes ago
Views: 110 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 3 • Rating: 0
researchok
French Philosopher Alain Badiou on the Real Expression of Love: 'If You Limit Yourself to Sexual Pleasure It's Narcissistic'
6 hours, 57 minutes ago
Views: 83 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Haywood Jabloeme
Closing the Racial and Generational Divides
10 hours, 47 minutes ago
Views: 89 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Aziz Poonawalla
I Speak for Myself: All-American
14 hours, 43 minutes ago
Views: 135 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5
Mostly sane, most of the time.
So wake up and notice already
2 days, 10 hours ago
Views: 294 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 2 • Rating: 7
Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
3 days, 14 hours ago
Views: 268 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5
Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
3 days, 15 hours ago
Views: 319 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
4 days, 21 hours ago
Views: 371 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Rain is good for you...
Rain is bad for electrical equipment... -- Outdoor concert, Jones Beach, NY, Circa 1984
© 2012 Little Green Footballs
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy


