3 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:25:10pm |
I can almost hear the waves, gently rushing in & out from the rocks.
Almost.
4 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:26:01pm |
Big old dandelion on the right.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN???
//
LOL!
5 | steve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:26:05pm |
re: #3 Floral Giraffe
I can almost hear the waves, gently rushing in & out from the rocks.
Almost.
It is probably an optical illusion;-)
6 | sngnsgt Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:27:11pm |
Oh Jeez,
I'm not going to post a link, but apparently, Walgreens was selling an Obama Chia Pet. It has since been pulled from the shelves. Charles, delete this post if you feel it need not be here.
7 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:27:50pm |
re: #5 steve
Next, you're gonna tell me the dandelion is on the left!
(Yes, you'd be correct!)
LOL!
8 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:28:09pm |
re: #4 Floral Giraffe
Big old dandelion on the right.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN???
//
LOL!
On the right? It's on the left!
/enough of this focus on the Right.
9 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:28:52pm |
re: #6 sngnsgt
Isn't that story nearly six months old?
10 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:28:52pm |
Sleepy time for me!
Stay scaly & WHACK the trolls, that are sure to pop up!
G'Night, dear Lizards!
11 | steve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:29:01pm |
re: #7 Floral Giraffe
Next, you're gonna tell me the dandelion is on the left!
(Yes, you'd be correct!)
LOL!
If it is, it most likely is a democrat.
12 | sngnsgt Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:30:12pm |
re: #9 Slumbering Behemoth
The article I found says Monday, September 28, 2009. I had not heard it before.
13 | Dancing along the light of day Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:30:25pm |
re: #6 sngnsgt
Oh Jeez,
I'm not going to post a link, but apparently, Walgreens was selling an Obama Chia Pet. It has since been pulled from the shelves. Charles, delete this post if you feel it need not be here.
I WANT ONE!
It can pair up with my Mr. T Chia.
They never grow & are such a scam,
BUT
funny as all heck!
Now, G'Night, again!
14 | BARACK THE VOTE Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:30:29pm |
re: #9 Slumbering Behemoth
Isn't that story nearly six months old?
Yeah.
Still funny though, imo. And I like Obama.
15 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:30:31pm |
re: #6 sngnsgt
Oh Jeez,
I'm not going to post a link, but apparently, Walgreens was selling an Obama Chia Pet. It has since been pulled from the shelves. Charles, delete this post if you feel it need not be here.
Chi pet?
/there goes the country.
19 | steve Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:35:10pm |
re: #6 sngnsgt
Oh Jeez,
I'm not going to post a link, but apparently, Walgreens was selling an Obama Chia Pet. It has since been pulled from the shelves. Charles, delete this post if you feel it need not be here.
I was in a local mega store and say the book version of Obamama's inaugural speech. Also had his book on family and kids.
20 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:35:36pm |
re: #17 sngnsgt
Oh. Okay, thanks. That's CVS, not Walgreens.
The Walgreens story (pulling the Chia off the shelves) is nearly six months old.
The Chia Obama is making a comeback on drug store shelves, more than five months after Walgreens yanked it over concerns that it might offend customers.
CVS stores began stocking the special edition Chia in select markets this week, according to the company that produces it -- just in time for the holiday season.
21 | BARACK THE VOTE Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:39:17pm |
22 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:39:31pm |
I'm frightened what this means for America, think about, if they can pull a Chi Pet off the shelves what's next?
/are we going to sit around and watch our freedoms disappear one by one?
23 | sngnsgt Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:41:15pm |
re: #20 Slumbering Behemoth
Oh. Okay, thanks. That's CVS, not Walgreens.
The Walgreens story (pulling the Chia off the shelves) is nearly six months old.
I believe you, I just posted the one I found dated today. Like I said above, I had never heard about it before.
24 | BARACK THE VOTE Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:42:55pm |
re: #22 Bagua
I'm frightened what this means for America, think about, if they can pull a Chi Pet off the shelves what's next?
/are we going to sit around and watch our freedoms disappear one by one?
Bush Demands Nation's Mood Ring Be Raised To Highest Level
In a speech to the American people last night, President George W. Bush unveiled plans to raise the National Mood Ring to the highest possible color of stress.
"We are at a very critical juncture in the war on terrorism," says Bush. "This nation can make our Mood Ring go from Grey to Dark Black, but we must unite now. I am asking every man, woman and child to feel the fear and raise that level."
25 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:43:08pm |
re: #23 sngnsgt
Me I'm still outraged over this! I draw the line at novelties.
26 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:43:16pm |
27 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:45:18pm |
re: #21 iceweasel
Che-che-che-a pets!
How about if the 0bama Chia grows out in a sort of rainbow 'fro and he's holding a cardboard John 3:16 sign?
28 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:46:47pm |
re: #23 sngnsgt
Well, you don't have to believe me, it's pretty much all there in the article you linked.
But yeah, the whole Walgreens pulling that item off the shelves happened back in early April this year. I guess the higher ups at Walgreens decided the item was inappropriate.
29 | sngnsgt Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:49:07pm |
re: #28 Slumbering Behemoth
I believe you, all I'm saying is I had never seen it before.
30 | BARACK THE VOTE Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:50:42pm |
re: #29 sngnsgt
I believe you, all I'm saying is I had never seen it before.
Hey, it's all good. It's a funny story. I don't mind seeing it again. And they just reported it again. It's not like you did anything wrong.
Personally, I would totally buy one of those for humour purposes, and I like Obama.
31 | Bagua Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:50:49pm |
re: #28 Slumbering Behemoth
I've got my sign picked out for the next TeaParty.
.
Obama - Show us your Chia Pet
/what's he hidin?
32 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:52:23pm |
Fear not, Chia0bama enthusiasts. Methinks it's only a matter of time before that particular product winds up at the As Seen on TV Store.
/My family, on the other hand, shops at the Just Like As Seen on TV Shop when it comes to shopping for me.
33 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:52:59pm |
re: #29 sngnsgt
I guess I am getting hung up on the word "believe".
That you haven't heard of it 'til now suggests that you don't watch much tv, and you don't subscribe to The Daily Outrage newsletter, which is a good thing.
34 | sngnsgt Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:54:05pm |
re: #30 iceweasel
Hey, it's all good. It's a funny story. I don't mind seeing it again. And they just reported it again. It's not like you did anything wrong.
Personally, I would totally buy one of those for humour purposes, and I like Obama.
I think it's funny as hell too, I can just hear lefty's screeching racism also even though it doesn't seem like it was intended for that purpose.
35 | Fenway_Nation Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:55:32pm |
re: #34 sngnsgt
Wonder if anyone has a Chia Hall of Presidents Working...
Collect 'em all! Supplies of Chia Chester A Arthur and Chia Martin Van Buren are limited!
36 | BARACK THE VOTE Mon, Sep 28, 2009 11:57:50pm |
re: #34 sngnsgt
I think it's funny as hell too, I can just hear lefty's screeching racism also even though it doesn't seem like it was intended for that purpose.
Well, I am a leftie. I think it's funny, and I would buy one, and I would have bought one with Dubya too.
But I can see a good argument for pulling it. Making fun of black people's hair is a staple among people who tell racist jokes and that sort of thing. I don't personally have a problem with the Chia Pet, or think it was intended to be racist, but I can see where other people would find it insensitive. So I don't really have a problem with them pulling it.
In another 50 (or maybe even 20!) years, it won't be a big deal and wouldn't need to be pulled, I think.
37 | TheMatrix31 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:00:17am |
re: #32 Fenway_Nation
Soon enough, Obama himself will be featured at one of those "As Seen On TV" stores.
38 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:02:53am |
re: #34 sngnsgt
I don't think it was intended to be racist. It was just a poorly conceived product intended to cash in on the merchandising bonanza of "America's First Black President".
Seriously. You name a product, and I'll all but guarantee that someone has put Obama's image on it.
And why not? If you put any famous actor's/musician's/model's/whatever image on something like a lighter, you probably have to pay them royalties or something to use that image. Using the image of a POTUS? Not so much. It's royalty free money in the bank, baby. Provided people are buying.
39 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:05:19am |
re: #38 Slumbering Behemoth
During the Clinton/Lewinsky mess, I wanted to market knee pads with the Presidential seal on them.
Turns out the seal is copyrighted, and can't be used without permission. Who knew?
40 | sngnsgt Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:08:10am |
re: #38 Slumbering Behemoth
I'm with ya, Capitalism makes the world go 'round.
42 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:10:48am |
re: #38 Slumbering Behemoth
I don't think it was intended to be racist. It was just a poorly conceived product intended to cash in on the merchandising bonanza of "America's First Black President".
Seriously. You name a product, and I'll all but guarantee that someone has put Obama's image on it.
And why not? If you put any famous actor's/musician's/model's/whatever image on something like a lighter, you probably have to pay them royalties or something to use that image. Using the image of a POTUS? Not so much. It's royalty free money in the bank, baby. Provided people are buying.
And they are. A supermarket I know sells these horrible, crappy, eco-conscious bags with Obama and the WH on them. They're so tacky it's embarrassing.
But I guarantee that more people are now buying and using those bags in that neighbourhood because it has Obama on it. No question.
44 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:12:26am |
The Chia Pet business is a bit Grass.
The Chia Statue of Liberty is obviously sexist.
The Chia George Washington is racist too, makes him look Dutch. {shudder}
And the Chia Abraham Lincoln is quite clearly Hightist.
46 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:15:45am |
The crazies at the Malkin site are batting around Nirtherism in the Olympic thread's comment section, claiming that neither 0bama nor McCain were qualified to be President and that the election must be nullified by the States.
They're also fantasizing that this development would lead to perjury charges (?) against Pelosi, for some reason.
The crazy is too deep for hip waders over there now.
47 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:15:53am |
re: #42 iceweasel
And they are. A supermarket I know sells these horrible, crappy, eco-conscious bags with Obama and the WH on them. They're so tacky it's embarrassing.
But I guarantee that more people are now buying and using those bags in that neighbourhood because it has Obama on it. No question.
Wow, creepy ecObama bags, we're doomed.
48 | Fenway_Nation Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:16:48am |
Scene from the next episode of Fenway & The Behemoth:
The Behemoth walks into the kitchen as Fenway is staring intently at a ballgame on TV or the MILF-tastic neighbor sunbathing. The microwave is on, but nothing's in it. Next to Fenway is a box of pizza with just one slice left.
The Behemoth {grabbing the last slice of pizza}: What are you doing?
The Fenway {Hardly taking his eyes off of whatever has his attention as the Behemoth starts eating the last slice}: Just having the last slice of pizza for lunch.
The Behemoth: But didn't you say you hated cold pizza?
The Fenway: Yeah...why do-? {Takes his eyes off of whatever's held his attention and sees the Behemoth chomping away at the last slice before snatching the slice from Behemoth's hand and throwing it into the microwave.}.
The Behemoth: It's not like I paid for that or anything.
The Fenway: Yeah...well it's not like I posted bail for you the last time you-
The Behemoth: Cripes...you gonna keep harping about that? It's already been-
The Fenway: 48 hours? I know...
49 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:17:21am |
re: #39 SixDegrees
Commercial use of the Presidential Seal is prohibited. Using a picture/caricature of any POTUS is fair game as far as I know.
re: #40 sngnsgt
High five! I didn't vote for him, and I am not a fan, but if I owned a company that manufactured cheap beach towels, you better damn well believe my company would have been cranking out beach towels with his mug and the "Yes We Can" slogan at the opportune time.
Just like Elvis Presley commemorative plates. I don't have to like them myself to sell them to people who do.
50 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:17:21am |
Maybe I should come out with a Chia John Holmes, for the ladies.
51 | TheMatrix31 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:17:38am |
re: #46 SixDegrees
Hey, I'm all for a do-over myself...but that's just fucking stupid.
52 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:17:39am |
re: #47 Bagua
Wow, creepy ecObama bags, we're doomed.
Hey, I'm all for the eco bags. Obama's got amazing star power too, although the people with ODS don't want to concede it. Put his image on anything at all and you could sell it.
53 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:19:36am |
re: #51 TheMatrix31
Hey, I'm all for a do-over myself...but that's just fucking stupid.
I haven't spent any time over there for a while. It's turned into a fever swamp.
54 | Fenway_Nation Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:19:49am |
re: #52 iceweasel
You'll have to try telling that to my local supermarket that had display cases of 0bama innaguration DVDs and special commemrative magazines along those lines.
55 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:20:04am |
A Nirth Olympiad?re: #52 iceweasel
Not me, I feel sorry for all the trees. But yes, it is a welcome change from all the Poster Bear pictures.
56 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:21:05am |
re: #45 Jimmah
Gratuitous, obnoxious, and assaulting. +1
58 | Fenway_Nation Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:22:41am |
For the record, the 2014 Winter Olympics are going to be held in Sochi, Russia...a city roughly 30 miles from the border of the country the Russkies took it upon themselves to invade last summer.
59 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:23:33am |
re: #48 Fenway_Nation
Bastard! I gave you my last condom. I should at least get the last slice of pizza.
/
60 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:25:30am |
re: #58 Fenway_Nation
For the record, the 2014 Winter Olympics are going to be held in Sochi, Russia...a city roughly 30 miles from the border of the country the Russkies took it upon themselves to invade last summer.
For all the snake-handling spasms of outrage generated over 0bama's involvement in pitching Chicago's Olympic bid, nothing at all has been said about the massive, stinking corruption in the IOC itself, which is long overdue to be hosed down with a tanker load of bleach.
61 | Fenway_Nation Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:29:07am |
re: #59 Slumbering Behemoth
Bastard! I gave you my last condom. I should at least get the last slice of pizza.
/
'You mean the one that was perforated with more holes than Bonnie & Clyde's car? Thanks for nothing...I oughta beat you to death with this box. Maybe it's my imagination, but I still itch...down there'
62 | Jimmah Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:30:35am |
re: #56 Slumbering Behemoth
Gratuitous, obnoxious, and assaulting. +1
And spiritually undermining too, I hope :)
63 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:33:49am |
64 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:36:11am |
65 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:38:17am |
re: #61 Fenway_Nation
What am I, the quality control department? I told not to get with that barfly. The peg leg, eye patch, and the neck warts should have been a clue, dude.
BTW, quit asking me this. If you don't know by now...
66 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:38:22am |
re: #64 iceweasel
Banished into the ether after returning to soil the same thread again.
68 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:39:54am |
re: #67 Jimmah
Stop repeating everything I say, it's annoying.
70 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:43:14am |
71 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:43:38am |
re: #62 Jimmah
I've got your spiritual undermining right here.
73 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:46:41am |
re: #72 Jimmah
"RadCap" - atheist concern troll (ex)
Oh wait-- was that the guy Charles was talking about when he said we had a meltdown in the QualiaSoup thread? It was the right thread...
77 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 12:52:15am |
79 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:03:54am |
re: #78 TheMatrix31
I think that's the point, to baffle with bullshit. I mean, seriously...
Put simply, the premise you are putting forth is that logic must be accepted on faith - and that to reject the acceptance of logic by means of faith is to be an 'enemy' of logic.
... who the fuck writes like that? Bullshit.
80 | Bagua Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:04:46am |
re: #78 TheMatrix31
No one was more confused than RadCap himself.
81 | TheMatrix31 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:12:52am |
re: #79 Slumbering Behemoth
That's why you don't see me get caught up in philosophical/theoretical/spiritual/whatever discussions.
82 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:18:58am |
re: #72 Jimmah
"RadCap" - atheist concern troll (ex)
His descent was inexorable and his destiny was inevitable.
83 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:21:02am |
re: #82 Salamantis
His descent was inexorable and his destiny was inevitable.
Just went through that thread seeing what I missed when Jimmah and I checked out. Sal, you did some excellent work there. Updinged a lot.
Radcrap had no chance.
84 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:22:23am |
re: #83 iceweasel
Just went through that thread seeing what I missed when Jimmah and I checked out. Sal, you did some excellent work there. Updinged a lot.
Radcrap had no chance.
Once I was finished with him, he had nothing left he could do but to flame out with Charles...;~)
85 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:26:43am |
re: #82 Salamantis
His descent was inexorable and his destiny was inevitable.
His departure not regrettable and his stay forgettable.
86 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:29:05am |
I can't believe he actually tried to lift one of the three great branches of philosophy - ontology, the theory of being, epistemology (includes logic), the theory of knowledge, and axiology (comprised of ethics and aesthetics), the theory of value, and transplant it into theology!
Geez!
87 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:29:48am |
re: #81 TheMatrix31
I'm no intellectual giant, but even I know arguing that people accept logic on faith is friggen' stupid.
88 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:31:20am |
An interesting espisode of the BBC's Heart and Soul radio program, on the religious implications of finding life on other planets, from the viewpoint of different faiths, from Buddhism to creationism to the Vatican and it's church-run observatories.
Traces the roots of fundamentalism to the Enlightenment, when the Church openly embraced science as a tool for understanding creation. Then things went horribly wrong.
Longish - about a half-hour - but thought provoking.
89 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:33:46am |
re: #87 Slumbering Behemoth
I'm no intellectual giant, but even I know arguing that people accept logic on faith is friggen' stupid.
When ya get right dow to it, epistemology is really divisible into the theory of abstract deductive knowledge - the realm of Aristotelian and predicate logic - and the theory of concrete inductive knowledge - the realm of the theory of science.
90 | Jimmah Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:35:00am |
re: #82 Salamantis
His descent was inexorable and his destiny was inevitable.
Absolutely, he had a great recipe for disaster:
1) Make unwinnable, self annihilating and idiotic argument.
2) Make it to a bunch of people who are a lot smarter and much more knowledgable in the subject than you are.
And for the finishing touch:
3)Insult host.
91 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:35:11am |
The Secret Service is looking into the Facebook Poll on assassinating the President.
92 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:36:20am |
93 | Oh no...Sand People! Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:39:13am |
MSM propaganda of the day:
[Link: in.reuters.com...]
NEW YORK (Reuters Life!) - Economic downturns may not be good for your bottom line but they might be a boon to your health, according to a study on health trends during the 20 years around the Great Depression.
Researchers from the University of Michigan found U.S. life expectancy increased by 6 years between 1929 and 1932, from 57 to 63, with the increase occurring for both men and women and for whites and non-whites.
..."There is more time to sleep, and because people have less money, they are less likely to spend as much on alcohol and tobacco," he said.
*facepalm*
94 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:39:23am |
re: #91 SixDegrees
I wonder if it's just some dumb punk living in their parent's basement that thought he/she was making a [really stupid] political statement, or if it was some red meat thug trying to drum up a support base via the Facebook network.
In any event, condoning the murder of the POTUS to millions of potential eyeballs has to be one of the dumbest stunts ever pulled.
Darwin Award.
95 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:39:50am |
re: #86 Salamantis
This is the part of the story where me and my stoner friends take your egghead arse behind the gym and beat your ass for using big words.
///
96 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:40:01am |
re: #92 iceweasel
Yeah, that was a sweet smackdown, when you pointed out that he was conflating 'philosophies' with theology.
He was a poseur. Altho I'd already nailed him here.
Idiot troll was idiotic.
He never recovered from that one. He was so enraged that I'd ripped off his short and curlies that his frustration boiled over into a rage-fueled suicidal Charles-directed insult.
97 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:41:28am |
re: #95 Slumbering Behemoth
This is the part of the story where me and my stoner friends take your egghead arse behind the gym and beat your ass for using big words.
///
That actually happened to me early in high school. Then I signed up for Tae Kwan Do.
They only tried it once more after that...;~)
98 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:42:50am |
re: #95 Slumbering Behemoth
You forgot to add "and stuff" to the end of that sentence.
or using big words and stuff.
Mouth breathers usually add "and stuff" to cover any non-specifics, since they cannot articulate anything nuanced.
99 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:42:53am |
re: #93 Oh no...Sand People!
MSM propaganda of the day:
[Link: in.reuters.com...]
*facepalm*
Hard to say without reading the study, but I can only disagree with the conclusions as stated. The Great Depression began in 1929 - the period reported doesn't allow time for changes in lifestyle brought about by the Depression to be reflected in life expectancy statistics. It seems far more likely that the increase noted was due to the much better lifestyle enjoyed by the population during the lead-up to the Depression - the Roaring 20s, a boomtime when the standard of living was notably high for a large number of people.
100 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:43:53am |
re: #94 theheat
I wonder if it's just some dumb punk living in their parent's basement that thought he/she was making a [really stupid] political statement, or if it was some red meat thug trying to drum up a support base via the Facebook network.
In any event, condoning the murder of the POTUS to millions of potential eyeballs has to be one of the dumbest stunts ever pulled.
Darwin Award.
Completely agree with your conclusion. My bet is on dumb punk basement dweller, but perhaps I'll be surprised if more details emerge.
101 | Fenway_Nation Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:43:55am |
re: #95 Slumbering Behemoth
On the next Fenway & The Behemoth, Fenway's decided that he hasn't bedded enough neurotic, pill-popping single moms and accompanies The Behemoth to his (pick number between 10 and 20) High School Reunion.
103 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:44:42am |
re: #91 SixDegrees
The Secret Service is looking into the Facebook Poll on assassinating the President.
You must have missed the memo. The poll was generated by a lefty plant in order to get anonymous people to vote against their will for an option they don't actually approve of. Or something.
/
104 | Oh no...Sand People! Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:45:25am |
re: #97 Salamantis
That actually happened to me early in high school. Then I signed up for Tae Kwan Do.
They only tried it once more after that...;~)
I bet.
/
105 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:48:22am |
re: #102 Jimmah
One of my favourite smackdowns, ice-ski. Favourited :)
I favourited you a long time ago, Jimmah-ski. :)
106 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:48:35am |
Does anyone here follow professional boxing? Did you watch the Klitschko/Arreola smackdown? Just curious.
107 | Oh no...Sand People! Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:49:06am |
Well, bug sprayers are here. Gotta go!
108 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:50:03am |
FWIW - Firefox just shit all over me and turned off the lights again. Getting tired of this.
109 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:50:55am |
re: #104 Oh no...Sand People!
I bet.
/
The guy I took it from was named Bill Motley, a brawling drunken Mississippi redneck serving in Korea, who had a dimunitive Korean ROC royally kick his ass in a bar one night. Impressed, he tailed the little fella back to his temple, successfully begged them to teach him, and rose to become Korean Kumite Champion before his second tour of duty was over (he re-upped just so he could continue his lessons).
He was one badass dude.
110 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:51:06am |
re: #107 Oh no...Sand People!
That's a helluva'n excuse to end a date early, but points for originality ;-)
111 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:51:37am |
re: #97 Salamantis
Damn. Did they at least offer you a beer and a toke? That's the proper thing to do.
112 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:52:23am |
re: #111 Slumbering Behemoth
Damn. Did they at least offer you a beer and a toke? That's the proper thing to do.
No, they just left me alone after that. Which was fine with me.
113 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:56:23am |
re: #106 theheat
Does anyone here follow professional boxing? Did you watch the Klitschko/Arreola smackdown? Just curious.
I take it no one here watches boxing.
RINOs!
114 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:58:24am |
re: #113 theheat
I take it no one here watches boxing.
RINOs!
It was one-sided and brutal.
The heavyweight fight I really wanna see is his brother Wladimir take on Alexander Povetkin.
115 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 1:59:46am |
re: #108 theheat
FWIW - Firefox just shit all over me and turned off the lights again. Getting tired of this.
I've heard an increasing number of horror stories about the latest release. Not anxious to upgrade.
116 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:03:21am |
re: #114 Salamantis
Not only was it one-sided and brutal, but Arreola outed himself as crude, even for a boxer, when he went on his sobbing/cursing flounce at the end of the match. (Apparently, this is how boxers flounce.) A classless ass as a person, and a one-dimensional thug as a boxer.
117 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:04:58am |
re: #115 SixDegrees
I spend a good portion of my day restarting my application. And I have no vote in the matter. Firefox is a most undemocratic browser. Say what you will about IE, but it's far more stable.
118 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:06:01am |
re: #117 theheat
I spend a good portion of my day restarting my application. And I have no vote in the matter. Firefox is a most undemocratic browser. Say what you will about IE, but it's far more stable.
IE is what I use. I see no good reason to change.
119 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:06:10am |
re: #98 theheat
You forgot to add "and stuff" to the end of that sentence.
Mouth breathers usually add "and stuff" to cover any non-specifics, since they cannot articulate anything nuanced.
I add 'and stuff' all the time.
I'm under the illusion that it can be charming and ironic, when tacked on to an otherwise articulate and clever list.
/don't disillusion me!
120 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:07:45am |
re: #117 theheat
Oddly enough, I have not had a single problem running firefox on xp. Must be lucky, or something.
122 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:10:38am |
re: #119 iceweasel
I think the "charming and ironic" part is only recognized as such by people sharp enough to see the sarcasm.
You know.
And stuff.
123 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:12:13am |
Here's a few sad poems for y'all.
Beautiful Broken One
She sits hunched over the bar,
Hellenic features hidden between her arms
Face flat on the counter
Drunk yet again.
The barmaid says not to bother her:
She's been that way since her husband and young son
Met a drunken driver on the road one night,
Leaving two dead beloveds
And one barely surviving,
Beautiful but broken thing.
She rouses herself
Fumbles for her car keys
And stumbles out the door...
Moontime Dream
I turn from places shadow-filled
And cringe at calling whipporwills
Shun spiders on my windowsill
Mama had a moontime dream.
My crops lie rotting on the hill
For fear makes water of my will
As deep I dread the final chill
Mama had a moontime dream.
Last month she sprang awake and cried
"Next moon my poor man's gonna die!"
Now she just sits...and stares...and sighs
Mama had a moontime dream.
I mourn that I must pass away
But surely I shall die today
And there is nothing more to say
Mama had a moontime dream.
I hide my eyes from our young son.
How could I tell him our time's done?
Now, in the barn, I raise my gun:
Murdered by a moontime dream.
Dark Soul
She is in her mid teens
Yet feels thousands of worn years old.
She likes to lick razor blades
And brand lit cigarette patterns in her arms.
She mourns that the aliveness these make her feel
Evaporates with her pain.
She craves transcendent intensity
Not caring what kind it is.
She dresses all in black
And cakes black makeup on her pale face.
She shares random shags with hungry strangers
More out of pity than desire.
She cannot remember
When she didn’t feel tired of it all
Or when anything felt fresh or new.
She does whatever drugs she is given
Hoping that they are too much.
Her wrists are scarred from cutting
And her folks hide their pills.
She listens to goth and emo
And her handle is LostChild.
She reads Clive Barker and Anne Rice,
And pretends she wishes she were undead
But what she really thinks she wants
Is not to be alive any more.
What she actually deep down desires
Is to find some meaning she can cling to
But she’s too young yet to realize
That meaning must be made, not found.
And does not grasp the desperate race she’s in
Between that understanding
And self-destruction.
Pagans and Progress:
The Invasion of Sanctuary
At the appointed place
The brisk breeze tears onshore
With a fine salt kiss
And the sea sparkles like first romance.
The sun sets smoothly:
A golden plum leaching into azure pudding
And - surprise! - a half-moon bows westward;
A crisp white semisphere rising in the still-blue sky.
The beach foliage is packed and not-quite-smooth
But solid, like broccoli florets or coral on a reef.
Yet a bowsprit part wends its brown way through
Like a snail track through slime
The yellow snail dozer asleep beside.
Even here the roads are rolling.
To My Ex-Wife
Upon futher reflection
I've discovered how amazingly gone you are.
By means of your conspicuous absence
You have become the vastest void in my empty universe.
I am shorn of security
Bereft of reference.
Though (and this is how I lost you)
When here, you blended seamlessly beneath my arm
As solid as the firmament, and as taken for granted
Now my heart cries out inconsolably
To abrupt dread lonely nothingness.
124 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:12:30am |
126 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:14:37am |
127 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:16:32am |
re: #125 theheat
Moontime Dream is quite good... speaking as someone who knew someone who shot their self in their barn. Sad.
128 | Dar ul Harbarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:19:26am |
Good work if you can get it.
National Science Foundation staff looking a porn at work.
Some snippets:
As for the unnamed "senior executive" who spent at least 331 days looking at pornography at work, investigators said his proclivity for pornography was common knowledge among several co-workers.
...
Another employee in a different case was caught with hundreds of pictures, videos and even PowerPoint slide shows containing pornography. Asked by an investigator whether he had completed any government work on a day when a significant amount of pornography was downloaded, the employee responded, "Um, I can't remember," according to records.
...
Another employee who stored nude images of herself on her computer told investigators she mistakenly had downloaded the pictures. She received counseling and was told to adhere to the foundation's policies on computer use.
129 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:19:46am |
Here's another.
Slamdance
Beast Machine was cranking at the Wild Child.
Bammers, bouncing like a broke rack, were
Careeening off each other's bumpers.
A lone atom hung back from the random plasma
Wanting to fill the hurly-burly spaces
Release to chaos, but instead
Sitting as the singer belted incoherencies.
Was it too soon? He still limped, and
Avoided bumping his left shoulder, though the
Doctor said it was okay. He was
Still tender, stiff and sore, felt frangible
And missed his sling.
He still avoided others' eyes, too
And had nightmares about windshields
Warm dark wetness underbrow, and snapping.
The stitches were out now
And the scars didn't look too bad, but
He felt unhealed yet.
His divorce had shattered him
More deeply than the accident.
How horribly people could hurt one another!
But he knew that an unused arm
Would wither, and a heart also.
Swallowing his pain and fear, he forced the
Beginnings of a smile, and after a long absence
Once again entered the Dance.
130 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:23:24am |
re: #124 theheat
Heh. Knowing the insane amount of varying pieces of PC hardware out there, and the many different manufacturers of every single said piece of hardware, and the complications of coding software for every possible hardware configuration, I am by no means a fanboy of any kind of browser or OS.
I like FF because it works better for me than IE, on my system. I like the XP OS because it can still run all the dusty old games I have, on my system.
131 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:23:51am |
I can't take too much sad poetry in succession. But one of my favorite, if not simplest little tunes, was that of that late Kurt Cobaine:
Jesus, don't want me for a sunbeam
Sunbeams are never made like meDon't expect me to cry
For the all the reasons you have to die
Don't ever ask your love of meDon't expect me to cry
Don't expect me to lie
Don't expect me to die for thee.
132 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:23:56am |
Attention: lesser known members of Congress also heckled Obama's speech:
133 | Slumbering Behemoth Stinks Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:26:13am |
re: #132 iceweasel
Statler and Waldorf FTW!
134 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:29:30am |
re: #130 Slumbering Behemoth
I'm also running XP, and I've had excellent luck. This latest transgression by FF stumps me. It came on out of the blue, and I haven't found any reason it's become so unstable. Previous to that, FF ran like a champ.
135 | Jimmah Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:30:55am |
re: #131 theheat
I can't take too much sad poetry in succession. But one of my favorite, if not simplest little tunes, was that of that late Kurt Cobaine:
Nice - one thing though - that was actually written by the Vaselines, a band from Edinburgh, Scotland, as Kurt explains here:
And here's the original:
136 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:33:48am |
This one has a complex, not quite chaotic rhyme scheme, designed to reflect its subject matter.
It might not be folks' cup of tea, but I'll give it a try:
Wave Tectonics
The rippling level plain
Lies smooth beneath the breeze;
A placid azure field
Quiescently plateaued,
Beneath the sky ensealed.
Then hidden gears engage
And troughs and piles are born.
Ranges arise and roll
Where all had even lain
The deep firmament bows
In rough and tumble rows
As hidden forces rise
And gather into mounds
That crease once quiet seas.
The rounded tops of hills
Begin a sharpening hone.
The slopes grow more severe
Abraded borders loom
And rain their salty tears.
From weeping edge they spill
Upon the slanted flanks
Arrayed in marching ranks.
The kiss of frothy snow
Begins to bless the peaks
Expands to sheath high sides
And roils in ivory wreaths.
Foundations are forsook
As altitude is gained
And angle more severe
Begins to crack with strain
Beneath burgeoning cliffs
Heavy with overhang.
Then crashing in cascade
The cool dark colors blanch
In frenzied avalanche.
The greens and blues are frayed
And slopes and slants all tumble
And curl and fall and rumble
As, shattering, they stumble.
Then with a raucous roar
The fatal slide ensues:
The liquid mountain pours
Into its sandy tomb
And flatness on the shore.
Its water flees the earth
Returning to the sea
To gather in its womb
And wait for quickening tides
And dream of its rebirth.
137 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:35:03am |
re: #135 Jimmah
Thanks, Jimmah! I did not know that. It's a terrific song, beautiful, simple, lyrics, and they did it perfectly.
138 | Karridine Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:35:36am |
And I suspect that all of Thailand will soon sing a sad song, bereft of the king who has sheltered and guided this Smiling Land for lo, these 5 decades...
He's hospitalized, the TVs are beginning a King Watch, and it feels much the same as when the Queen Mother passed a couple decades ago...
Turmoil and struggle await, and his passing is inevitable...
/Morning, Lizards
139 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:37:22am |
141 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:43:38am |
142 | lazardo Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:46:39am |
Got rotated out of the shift at the aid center, but since college is cancelled for the rest of the week I'll be back tomorrow at the same time.
Uploading photos now...
143 | Jimmah Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:47:35am |
re: #137 theheat
Thanks, Jimmah! I did not know that. It's a terrific song, beautiful, simple, lyrics, and they did it perfectly.
Agreed! And Nirvana were mad keen on the Vaselines. Here they are performing another cover of one of their songs:
144 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:58:36am |
re: #143 Jimmah
What would the world be without youtube? You find all these obscure gems in mere seconds. I've spent hours there, finding old blues tunes and concert footage I'd never see otherwise. Between that and Craigslist, it's a wonder I ever get anything done. Geesh.
I miss Nirvana. Being a NW native, I think a lot of us feel like we had some kind of claim on them that other fans had no right to, rational or not. It was like watching your child or best friend from grade school grow up and make the big time. I often wonder, had they gone on, what great music they would have made.
It's a crying shame.
145 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 2:59:35am |
Best rant in trainspotting:
TOMMY: Doesn't it make you proud to be Scottish?
RENTON: I hate being Scottish. We're the lowest of the fucking low, the scum of the earth, the most wretched, servile, miserable, pathetic trash that was ever shat into civilization. Some people hate the English, but I don't. They're just wankers. We, on the other hand, are colonized by wankers. We can't even pick a decent culture to be colonized by!
We are ruled by effete arseholes. It's a shite state of affairs and all the fresh air in the world will not make any fucking difference.
147 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:05:38am |
Here are a couple of scary poems I wrote; they'll be the last ones I post tonight.
The first one is self-explanatory, but the second is my poetic retelling of the Stephen King short story Strawberry Spring, where a fellow in a town haunted by a serial killer realizes by degrees that the killer is himself.
Dark Night of Bright Eyes
The beast had pounced upon them without warning.
His mount lay bleeding from its throat and dying.
The monster had retreated, its time biding.
The sky was tinted rose with dusk a-borning.
He listened to the dire behemoth growling
And to its massive bulk in close woods crashing.
His stricken steed surrendered its ghost thrashing
As he heard whines swell to exultant howling.
His only weapon had gone wildly flying.
He scoured adjacent ground for it, despairing
Yet his dim vision in the gloom was erring.
He searched around, then finally gave up trying.
The shadows of the forest slowly lengthened
As cool, then colder evening air was chilling
And with foul stench the rancid breeze was filling:
The stink of death from his poor horse had strengthened.
The murky light from setting sun had faded.
No sheltering surroundings could he run to
For when he'd fallen he had broken bones through
So he just sighed and certain death awaited.
And as the long fangs finally came to find him
He glimpsed the deadly gleaming gaze behind them
Then sharpness severed through his tortured cries
In that terrible dark night of shining eyes.
Strawberry Spring
Strawberry Spring has befallen me
And a lady I just met
In the silent hiding fog did we
Encounter to her regret
And my car boot harbors a trunk, I think
But I daren't open it yet.
My wife believes me inconstant;
How I wish that weren't true!
For strawberry juice stains my cement
A coagulating goo
And my memory yields back that foul night -
A night I will always rue
As she cringes and cries behind her lock
And as I unfasten the screws.
148 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:07:13am |
re: #146 theheat
Not to mention, the filthiest toilets.
i've seen toilets that rival that trainspotting toilet. One in the US in a major city-- and one in some rural place on the Asia side of Turkey.
The Turkish one was cleaner than the US one.
149 | Jimmah Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:07:58am |
re: #145 iceweasel
Best rant in trainspotting:
I love that speech. I often have similar thoughts, I have to say...especially when faced with staunch, ranting nationalists!
150 | BARACK THE VOTE Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:14:37am |
re: #148 iceweasel
i've seen toilets that rival that trainspotting toilet. One in the US in a major city-- and one in some rural place on the Asia side of Turkey.
The Turkish one was cleaner than the US one.
Addendum: I have also twice walked in on junkies shooting up in public toilets in the US. Once it was a woman, the second time a transexual.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. (being transexual)
152 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:16:48am |
re: #147 Salamantis
"You weren't the sunny kid in your class, were you?" - Deep Blue Sea
153 | Salamantis Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:19:13am |
155 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:23:51am |
re: #151 Jimmah
One of my all-time absolute favorites. This is what I make the windows shake with when I'm burned out with work. I like the demo version best. I remember the first time I heard it, I had to sit back and ask WTF?
156 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:25:09am |
The UN's lying, hypocritical, demonization of Israel continues, and in true Nazi fashion they have dredged up a Jew to write their anti-Semitic will.
In lockstep with the impotent acquiescence in Iran's nuclearization.
Will Pres. Obama and his Dem minions speak out forcefully against the anti-Semitic chorus, or will they watch the further fragmentation of the Dem Party?
[Link: www.cnn.com...]
158 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:30:49am |
159 | Bloodnok Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:31:47am |
Good morning!
And because I have had this song in my head for two days now (probably because of the line "there's too much caffeine in your bloodstream"):
160 | spinmore Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:33:21am |
I have had a change of heart.
Yesterday I suggested that Polanski should have to serve a 'triple' sentence for his crime of raping (and sodomizing) a 13 year-old girl (given that he fled justice).
However, after seeing how some of the 'Hollywood types' have come to his defense (of course now he's the victim) I have had a change of heart. Having a 14 year-old daughter of my own - I now would support this man's execution. Where have we come that we can now trivialize preying on young innocence? Perhaps if he had abused a pet there would be more outrage in Hollywood!?
161 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:35:34am |
re: #156 Spare O'Lake
The UN's lying, hypocritical, demonization of Israel continues, and in true Nazi fashion they have dredged up a Jew to write their anti-Semitic will.
In lockstep with the impotent acquiescence in Iran's nuclearization.
Will Pres. Obama and his Dem minions speak out forcefully against the anti-Semitic chorus, or will they watch the further fragmentation of the Dem Party?[Link: www.cnn.com...]
Elder of Zion has a complete Fisking of the Goldstone Report.
162 | Flyers1974 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:38:56am |
re: #156 Spare O'Lake
The UN's lying, hypocritical, demonization of Israel continues, and in true Nazi fashion they have dredged up a Jew to write their anti-Semitic will.
In lockstep with the impotent acquiescence in Iran's nuclearization.
Will Pres. Obama and his Dem minions speak out forcefully against the anti-Semitic chorus, or will they watch the further fragmentation of the Dem Party?[Link: www.cnn.com...]
Because Israel is in the overall right, it doesn't necessarily follow that Israel cannot ever do a bad thing. Do we know anything about this South African Judge? Do we know whether he has a history of being against Israel? What is the report based upon? Its understood that the UN is against Israel - but that doesn't mean they never get anything right. Example - a few years ago, the UN issued a report nailing on the head the reason for the Arabs F***edupness - and it had very little to do with Israel but very much to do with the corrupt nature of the Arab governments, failure to give women equal rights, etc...
163 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:44:03am |
re: #162 Flyers1974
Because Israel is in the overall right, it doesn't necessarily follow that Israel cannot ever do a bad thing. Do we know anything about this South African Judge? Do we know whether he has a history of being against Israel? What is the report based upon? Its understood that the UN is against Israel - but that doesn't mean they never get anything right. Example - a few years ago, the UN issued a report nailing on the head the reason for the Arabs F***edupness - and it had very little to do with Israel but very much to do with the corrupt nature of the Arab governments, failure to give women equal rights, etc...
We all know that Israel is not perfect, but we also know that Hamas is even more imperfect than Israel.
This U.N. report relies exclusively and uncritically on "eyewitness" testimony by Hamas and their shills, like Mads Gilbert. Meanwhile, they give Hamas a "benefit of the doubt" which is denied to Israel.
164 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:44:22am |
Hey y'all.
My Cowboys won. Yay.
What is going on here?
165 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:45:37am |
re: #117 theheat
I spend a good portion of my day restarting my application. And I have no vote in the matter. Firefox is a most undemocratic browser. Say what you will about IE, but it's far more stable.
I use Firefox almost exclusively, since I run Linux at home. But the newest release is plagued with bugs.
Sadly, this is fairly typical of open source software projects. As they age, the original developers lose interest and move on, leaving a pile of poorly documented spaghetti code behind for those who come later. Repeat this process a few times, and you've got a real mess on your hands. The release following a particularly bad one almost always improves things, but then the cycle starts all over again. No one ever takes the time to go through and clean up the code or provide documentation, either, so decaying quality is pretty much inevitable, at least for applications like browsers or word processors and the like. OS issues are more critical, and often (not always) actually get fixed, but OOS doesn't work well in all cases, and Firefox seems to be one of them.
166 | spinmore Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:46:34am |
re: #164 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Hey y'all.
My Cowboys won. Yay.
What is going on here?
From Philly - Don't you guys miss TO?
"WaaaH"
167 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:46:48am |
re: #160 spinmore
Interestingly enough, I read the victim has forgiven him. At what point she forgave him, I don't know.
This would seem like a black-and-white issue, but I don't feel it is. If he continued, for the past 30 years, to rape and victimize other women, that would certainly slant my perception of him. From what I read, at the time this happened, Polanski was a drugged-out loser (like a lot of Holly-weirdos). There is a chance, ever-so-slight, that he honestly regretted his actions and chose to follow a different path.
He's a great filmmaker, no question. People that have worked with him like and admire him. Could it be, the reason he is liked and supported is because he is not the same person he was 30 years ago? Do his redeeming qualities outshine the all the badness at this moment in time?
I believe he should stand trial for what he did and judged by a jury of his peers. There is no excuse for what he did, under the influence or not. But to say he should be murdered, 30 years later, as the person he is now, seems over-the-top.
168 | lazardo Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:48:35am |
re: #164 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
I productively wasted my afternoon in #154. q:
169 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:50:51am |
re: #164 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Bad browsers, good music, and - as far as I know - everyone still has pants on.
170 | Flyers1974 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:50:58am |
re: #163 Alouette
We all know that Israel is not perfect, but we also know that Hamas is even more imperfect than Israel.
This U.N. report relies exclusively and uncritically on "eyewitness" testimony by Hamas and their shills, like Mads Gilbert. Meanwhile, they give Hamas a "benefit of the doubt" which is denied to Israel.
That may well be. I haven't seen the report of course, much less analyzed same. I'd just give the individual, this S. African judge the benefit of the doubt regarding anti-semitisim until I knew the details. Judging from your comment, you must have seen the report already. And if the accounts came from Hamas alone, then of course you'd be right.
171 | Bloodnok Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:51:40am |
re: #169 theheat
Bad browsers, good music, and - as far as I know - everyone still has pants on.
Yesss. As far as you know.
172 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:52:50am |
re: #168 lazardo
Fuckin' "do gooder".
What? I'm supposed to feel guilty for doing nothing yesterday?
/
174 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:55:25am |
re: #173 lazardo
Yes you should, you heartless lazy couch potato.
"I do a lot of work with un-wed mothers. What? I help them get their start!"
-Steve Martin
175 | spinmore Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:56:14am |
re: #167 theheat
He engaged the legal system in a manner of his (and his lawyers) choosing. He fled the country (and justice). To execute is not 'to murder'. The execution suggestion is part hyperbole, part serious. How much of each - I'm not sure. In the end, the issue becomes one of how wrong and heinous you view the act (to 'lure' - drug - rape (details)) a child. "Over the top" . . . not so sure.
176 | Karridine Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:58:28am |
re: #158 Spare O'Lake
I second THAT! Thai TV has run video of the poor souls being swept down rain-swollen flood-level rivers, and reporting the flood-deaths... Prayers are with you, Lazardo!
177 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:58:29am |
re: #170 Flyers1974
That may well be. I haven't seen the report of course, much less analyzed same. I'd just give the individual, this S. African judge the benefit of the doubt regarding anti-semitisim until I knew the details. Judging from your comment, you must have seen the report already. And if the accounts came from Hamas alone, then of course you'd be right.
You can read the 575-page report here.
Needless to say, the evidence obtained in the report is only as reliable as the witnesses providing the testimony. Goldstone simple accepted as face value all the testimony provided by Hamas and "objective foreign observers" like Mads Gilbert.
178 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 3:59:26am |
re: #159 Bloodnok
You had the smiths stuck in your head for a couple days? You poor thing.
179 | lazardo Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:03:01am |
re: #176 Karridine
My family were lucky enough to live in one of the non-flooded parts of town. Prayers should be directed toward this one cousin of my mom's whose house got totalled.
180 | Bloodnok Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:03:24am |
re: #178 Sharmuta
You had the smiths stuck in your head for a couple days? You poor thing.
Hee hee! I know your feelings about them. Here's a palate cleanser for you. Best use of Beatles samples, EVAH.
181 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:07:21am |
re: #180 Bloodnok
The Beasties and the Beatles in one shot? You are forgiven. ;p
182 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:07:28am |
re: #175 spinmore
I'm not arguing what he did was horrible. At the time, if it were my child, and I had the opportunity, I'd have offed him myself.
You always hear about people on death row repenting what they've done. I'm sure this epiphany was facilitated almost exclusively by their incarceration. Had they been roaming scot-free, most of them would probably not waste time to reflect.
In Polanski's case, this has been a monkey on his back for more than 30 years. Whether he was incarcerated or had fled justice, you know it's been on his mind. A better person would not have fled. Of course, a better person would not have done what he did. But the fact remains, he's quite aware of his crime, and he's conducted himself differently. I think that counts for something.
I don't hope he escapes justice. He strongly believe he needs to stand trial, and finally face that demon he's avoided the past thirty-some years. But if his victim herself has forgiven him, I don't think executing him at this moment in time serves any purpose other than to satisfy rage.
183 | right_wing2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:08:08am |
Our local paper has a 'comment line' section, where you can submit very brief, 1-2 sentence, thoughts. Someone the other day said something along the lines of 'everyone admires President Obama. Some people just don't realize it.' I responded last night (we'll see if it gets printed) 'President Obama makes me long for the days we had someone who was merely as incompetent as President Carter.'
I've added a hand-made bumper sticker to my car: Reagan 2012: He may be gone, but at least he's not Obama'. 2 comments on it, both very positive.
184 | Bloodnok Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:09:03am |
re: #181 Sharmuta
The Beasties and the Beatles in one shot? You are forgiven. ;p
Yes! "Sgt. Pepper Reprise" and 3 different parts of "The End" built into one loop. Brilliant.
185 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:12:00am |
re: #183 right_wing2
He's tan. He's rested. He's ready.
Reagan 2012
186 | right_wing2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:14:29am |
re: #103 Slumbering Behemoth
Whoever was responsible for the facebook poll needs to face some serious questions, and yes, possible jail time. A question like 'Is President Obama an incompetent fool?' or 'Would America be better off if President Obama had never entered politics?' would still be seen as racist, but at least wouldn't be a threat.
What kind of idiot wrote that poll?
187 | Karridine Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:15:43am |
re: #179 lazardo
When natural disasters hit, we sense our real place in the scheme of Creation, and even though its at the apex of the animal kingdom, were subject to ALL the Laws of Nature...
/... I worked cleanup duty after the Christmas Tsunami, 2004
188 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:15:46am |
re: #186 right_wing2
What kind of idiot wrote that poll?
The kind of idiot that enjoys rectal exams by the FBI.
189 | lazardo Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:18:24am |
re: #187 Karridine
Our insignificance in the grand scheme of things requires one focus on the present so as not to let the despair of the reality overwhelm us. In the present, there are people that need to be prevented from starving to death after losing everything.
192 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:20:43am |
Y'all wish me luck today. Gonna go and try to "Hep a lady".
-John Coffey
(in bed)
193 | Flyers1974 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:21:02am |
re: #186 right_wing2
Whoever was responsible for the facebook poll needs to face some serious questions, and yes, possible jail time. A question like 'Is President Obama an incompetent fool?' or 'Would America be better off if President Obama had never entered politics?' would still be seen as racist, but at least wouldn't be a threat.
What kind of idiot wrote that poll?
I doubt there will be an arrest, much less a prosecution and guilty finding. The "question" was much to vague, legally speaking, to show intent to threaten or to incite others to threaten.
194 | theheat Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:23:32am |
195 | lazardo Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:41:12am |
We interrupt this thread silence with some classic internet crazy.
196 | Flyers1974 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:44:05am |
re: #195 lazardo
We interrupt this thread silence with some classic internet crazy.
Which part was crazy? I only got halfway through, the crazy part must have been further down.
197 | Flyers1974 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:46:36am |
re: #196 Flyers1974
Which part was crazy? I only got halfway through, the crazy part must have been further down.
You must be referring to this - Educated fools can't comprehend Cubicism. This goes a little to far.
198 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:49:29am |
Repost... So a denier who falsely claimed to be a physicist was brought to my attention. For your amusement. Also, this is why you should never claim to be a physicist when you aren't and then say bad science.
re: #557 Wondering Aloud
Can anyone here give me a realistic way in which warmer would be worse? Just asking because most of the land in the Northern Hemisphere is closer to the pole than I am and I am freezing my but off.
Well, to name three,
1. Major inhabited areas underwater rendering millions homeless coupled with a massive loss of capital.
2. Shifting growing patterns leading to drastic reduction in global food output. The midwestern US, for instance takes a big hit.
3. Lack of fresh water for areas dependent on meltwater for water. The U.S. SouthWest loses very badly.
Don't worry too much though, folks like freetoken 565 I don't see any way in which "physics" supports catastrophic global warming or even significant warming by CO2
.
Really now... Perhaps you have studied quantum mechanics then. What happens to a CO2 molecule when it is hit with IR? Answer, it absorbs the IR and since energy is conserved, it vibrates and gets hot. Even small amounts of CO2 in an overall atmospheric mix keeps a planet quite warm, as otherwise most of the IR would radiate back into space. How would you refute these basic facts?
Just for the record physics is my field and I read a lot of the supposed evidence in the original papers.
This would be called a lie. Honest. You are a total liar. How am I so certain? Answer, if you were a physicist, you would never have made such a stupid statement about CO2 like you did above. You would know Quantum Theory. Now, since you either don't know or have discounted quantum theory when you shouldn't have, you are clearly lying.
Further, if you were a physicist, you would give a reason, data or at least a mechanism for why the data you claim to have read is not good. I.e. you would object like a scientist might, if there were many left who doubted AGW, and further, no-one doubts that CO2 is a GHG.
BTW, I actually am a physicist. You are some twit from the internet who thinks that lying about his knowledge will help his case.
Before you tell us to "accept what has been learned by scientific endeavor" are you aware that the actual evidence actually disproves the catastrophic warming models?
NO, because it does not. Care to give us a reference for this? Care to show us some data or give a mechanism for this outrageous and false claim? If you were a physicist, you would know that you need to back up insane claims rather than just spout them.
We say fails to support...
We being who? Right-wing fruit loops who are pretending to be scientists? Sure you do - but not the physics community. In fact, The American Physical Society, APS, (ever hear of that?) made it quite clear what the physics community thinks.
[Link: www.aps.org...]
WE, as in physicists, say
The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.
The "consensus" is definitely not what some of you think it is
.
It is true that some people (idiots like you specifically) deny that the consensus is overwhelming.
There is no consensus nor even any significant likelihood of catastrophe from AGW.
Really, did you see the APS statement?
Funny that as the evidence grows weaker the alarmists seem to get more shrill.
That would be called projection. Perhaps you should study physics.
199 | njdhockeyfan Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:50:14am |
re: #164 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Hey y'all.
My Cowboys won. Yay.
What is going on here?
What's up with Romo? It takes him over half a game to get going this year.
200 | freetoken Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:55:51am |
re: #198 LudwigVanQuixote
I was wondering if you were going to get around to the Inhofe thread late entries...
BTW, Sharm brought to my attention yesterday the 4 Degrees and Beyond meeting at Oxford that goes on through tomorrow. Sort of doomer stuff...
Sharm passed on the newspaper link... but I was able to finally find the PDF of the presentation of the authors who were mentioned in the news article:
[Link: www.eci.ox.ac.uk...]
Stuff you already know but I wanted to close the circle from last night.
/I'm heading back to the holodeck...
202 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:01:09am |
re: #200 freetoken
The late thread posters are kind of like flouncers. They show up when the thread is dead and try to get a "last word." They always repeat the same B.S. propaganda too.
They must see that as some sort of victory in their little crusade against science.
I also really hate it when they pretend to be scientists.
Also this link of yours:
[Link: www.eci.ox.ac.uk...]
Looks quite good.
203 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:01:35am |
re: #200 freetoken
Sure- blame the blue chick. I would have stuck around last night to discuss, but my modem got all wonky, and I just went to bed after that.
204 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:02:58am |
re: #201 Sharmuta
That's what I call a smack down.
Yep. It is a bad idea to say something stupid about science and then claim you are a physicist if one of us is actually about. We feel three compulsions:
1. Must set science straight!
2. Must crush the stupid for the honor of physics!
3. Must out the fraud!
Then we get marshmellows to put on sticks as we enjoy a slow troll roast.
205 | freetoken Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:03:16am |
re: #201 Sharmuta
Yes, indeed it was.
BTW, the link to the PDF is by the team of people that was mentioned in the news link you provided. As the conference is still ongoing not all the presentations are yet available.
The meeting is at Oxford, and it was called to discuss the affects of climate change assuming we are not going to change our ways. The UK Met office has concluded that business as usual ends up with the world warmer by 4C sometime in the 2060's or so, certainly by the end of the century.
The work being discussed is not a review of whether or not at least 4C is reached, but the actual impacts of such a change, as they (the Tyndall Center and the Hadley Center) are now convinced that if humans keep on doing what we have been doing then we are for certain going to change the world in a significant manner.
206 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:06:02am |
re: #205 freetoken
Yes, indeed it was.
BTW, the link to the PDF is by the team of people that was mentioned in the news link you provided. As the conference is still ongoing not all the presentations are yet available.
The meeting is at Oxford, and it was called to discuss the affects of climate change assuming we are not going to change our ways. The UK Met office has concluded that business as usual ends up with the world warmer by 4C sometime in the 2060's or so, certainly by the end of the century.
The work being discussed is not a review of whether or not at least 4C is reached, but the actual impacts of such a change, as they (the Tyndall Center and the Hadley Center) are now convinced that if humans keep on doing what we have been doing then we are for certain going to change the world in a significant manner.
And significant is catastrophic. I wish you would not use the term doomer. IT smacks of misplaced hysteria that should be dismissed. The situation with AGW is no more or less grim than standing on train tracks (and arguing about moving off them) while a locomotive races towards you. Sane people would be worried and move.
207 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:06:15am |
re: #204 LudwigVanQuixote
I remember one ID thread where a poster claimed to be a physicist and discussed ID at length, so I asked if physics allowed for supernatural explanations.
Funny- I never got an answer. ;)
208 | freetoken Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:09:16am |
re: #204 LudwigVanQuixote
Sadly few people care. For all the good work put into on a subject like this, the reality is only a minority of people on contemporary events blogs, or political blogs, actually follow this stuff. Many people are caught up with arguing over Gore=bad / Gore=good heated exchanges... few actually read the scientific writings.
IMO the problems we face are so multi-faceted that I get very much into a doomer mood wrt climate and environment. Economic and international relations will drive the day, not well thought out approaches to dealing with life on this planet.
Ultimately the "right" has little use for environmentalists except as whipping boys, and the "left" has all too often shown itself concerned more with a profound lack of understanding on why people do what they do and more specifically on why groups of people don't act the way they are "supposed" to do.
209 | freetoken Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:11:04am |
Off to the holodeck... will have to chat later.
210 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:16:06am |
re: #207 Sharmuta
I remember one ID thread where a poster claimed to be a physicist and discussed ID at length, so I asked if physics allowed for supernatural explanations.
Funny- I never got an answer. ;)
lol, You did well with that.
Yes, the tactic, that I see more and more from the evangelical right wing anti-science types is that out and out lying to claim false authority, is somehow OK. For them everything is a mtter of authority and accepting things on faith anyway. They have faith that Obama was born in Kenya, faith iin death panels and a literal interpetation of a translation of Bereshith (Genesis).
So science in their mirror world is a matter of faith and authority as well.
This is curious, because if you are believer, and you know how science works, since the final arbiter of any science is always the observation of the universe, then you must believe that science answers to authority but G-d himself.
211 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:16:32am |
re: #207 Sharmuta
I remember one ID thread where a poster claimed to be a physicist and discussed ID at length, so I asked if physics allowed for supernatural explanations.
Funny- I never got an answer. ;)
Shar, Shar. The answer was supposed to be created ex nihilo before your eyes, obviously.
212 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:17:04am |
Also, for those who care about Israel. Israel is very dependent on rain.
The AGW models predict much less rain for Israel.
213 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:19:31am |
re: #211 thedopefishlives
Shar, Shar. The answer was supposed to be created ex nihilo before your eyes, obviously.
Except that in quantum field theories, particles wink in and out of existence ex-nihilo all the time - and we have observed it - a lot.
For instance, there would be no, hyperfine splitting, Casimir effect or particle collider experiments if this were not true.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
214 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:20:25am |
re: #212 LudwigVanQuixote
Also, for those who care about Israel. Israel is very dependent on rain.
The AGW models predict much less rain for Israel.
On the topic of AGW models, just how good are they getting to be these days? Last I checked, which was some time ago, the models had poor performance in predicting previous years' data, which gave one a low sense of confidence in forward extrapolation. Is this still the case, and even if it is, is that even a valid criticism to make?
216 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:23:56am |
re: #215 irish rose
Good morning, lizards.
Good morning, {Rose}. It's a quiet morning in Lizardia today, cold and clear in the wild north country, and overall looks to be a pretty good day if I can stay awake to see it.
217 | irish rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:27:54am |
re: #216 thedopefishlives
Good morning, {Rose}. It's a quiet morning in Lizardia today, cold and clear in the wild north country, and overall looks to be a pretty good day if I can stay awake to see it.
Still pretty windy here, but it's supposed to die down later today.
I own a house, and I lost a big strip of vinyl siding off the 2nd story last night. I'm trying to work up the courage to crawl out on the roof and reattach it today... I'm terrified of heights.
218 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:29:11am |
re: #217 irish rose
Still pretty windy here, but it's supposed to die down later today.
I own a house, and I lost a big strip of vinyl siding off the 2nd story last night. I'm trying to work up the courage to crawl out on the roof and reattach it today... I'm terrified of heights.
Me, I'd like to own a house, but now I'm getting into the spendy season when money always feels so tight. Sigh. I just keep praying that things will work out and I can get out of this cabin once and for all soon.
219 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:29:26am |
re: #213 LudwigVanQuixote
Except that in quantum field theories, particles wink in and out of existence ex-nihilo all the time - and we have observed it - a lot.
For instance, there would be no, hyperfine splitting, Casimir effect or particle collider experiments if this were not true.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
You have to let people get more than one cup of coffee in them before you start talking like that.
220 | irish rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:31:44am |
re: #218 thedopefishlives
Me, I'd like to own a house, but now I'm getting into the spendy season when money always feels so tight. Sigh. I just keep praying that things will work out and I can get out of this cabin once and for all soon.
I hope you can, too.
221 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:32:37am |
re: #214 thedopefishlives
On the topic of AGW models, just how good are they getting to be these days? Last I checked, which was some time ago, the models had poor performance in predicting previous years' data, which gave one a low sense of confidence in forward extrapolation. Is this still the case, and even if it is, is that even a valid criticism to make?
Great questions.
There are a couple of interesting points to be made about this.
1. Much of the model vs. Data controversy back in the day was caused because the main satellite used to collect stratospheric data had degraded in it's orbit and hence was giving bad data. Once that was fixed, the models and the data matched much better. Also, as computers evolved and more power was available it was possible to do much finer detailed calculations.
Think of it as something like a taylor series. If you can only get the first order term, it isn't that good (usually) at predicting the development of a system, though you can still say some overall and important things. If you get more an more terms though, you get better and better. The computers finally got big enough to add more and more terms. Now there is a deep, long and detailed discussion to be made about how good is good enough, or how many terms do you need before it is good enough. The short answer here is that the scientific community thinks we have it good enough.
Here is a pretty old page, but look at the graph of model output as put against hard data.
[Link: www.gfdl.noaa.gov...]
You will see that the simulation follows the data quite well.
2. The models continuously integrate new observation as correction terms in order to "keep them on track." This makes their extrapolations even more accurate. We also keep adding more and more physics to them as we detail more and more small interactions. All of the models start with the big stuff so to speak. We are tweaking the fine details now. How those details get tweaked and put is, is also always based on direct observations to make sure we got that physics correct, before putting it in.
222 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:33:37am |
Since this is a photo thread, check out the gorgeous pic over at Panda's Thumb.
223 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:34:02am |
re: #219 Sharmuta
You have to let people get more than one cup of coffee in them before you start talking like that.
Yeah I know... On the putting faith in it's place thread, someone was going on about creation ex-nihilo being logically stupid... Had it not been a holiday, I would have pointed out that creation ex nihilo is the backbone of field theory.
224 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:34:34am |
re: #217 irish rose
I own a house, and I lost a big strip of vinyl siding off the 2nd story last night. I'm trying to work up the courage to crawl out on the roof and reattach it today... I'm terrified of heights.
I honestly would send my Dad in Ferrysburg to help you, but he's also afraid of heights. You might, however, try their church Covenant Life. They've got a great bunch of retired guys who do those kind of projects and I'm sure they would help you.
225 | irish rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:35:05am |
re: #222 Sharmuta
Since this is a photo thread, check out the gorgeous pic over at Panda's Thumb.
Nice.
226 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:36:54am |
re: #208 freetoken
Sadly few people care. For all the good work put into on a subject like this, the reality is only a minority of people on contemporary events blogs, or political blogs, actually follow this stuff. Many people are caught up with arguing over Gore=bad / Gore=good heated exchanges... few actually read the scientific writings.
IMO the problems we face are so multi-faceted that I get very much into a doomer mood wrt climate and environment. Economic and international relations will drive the day, not well thought out approaches to dealing with life on this planet.
Ultimately the "right" has little use for environmentalists except as whipping boys, and the "left" has all too often shown itself concerned more with a profound lack of understanding on why people do what they do and more specifically on why groups of people don't act the way they are "supposed" to do.
And in the mean time, the train approaches.
227 | Oh no...Sand People! Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:37:17am |
re: #189 lazardo
Our insignificance in the grand scheme of things requires one focus on the present so as not to let the despair of the reality overwhelm us. In the present, there are people that need to be prevented from starving to death after losing everything.
Speaking of that, just dropped off food to a neighbor, has 13 people in his house over in Pasig. The recovery here is going to take some time.
228 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:37:26am |
re: #221 LudwigVanQuixote
Alright. I'll buy that. I'm a computer scientist, not a physicist, although I did a little study in basic mechanics in college. So to me, the programming of the models is more of interest than the data they show - GIGO is a very applicable truism in computer modeling.
229 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:39:24am |
Speaking of climate change, Ludwig & freetoken:
Grant Project to Focus on Communicating the Health Impacts of Climate Change
Climate change poses a potentially significant threat to the public's health, and addressing it is among President Obama's top priorities. Edward W. Maibach, Ph.D., M.P.H., professor and director of the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University, and Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D., assistant professor at American University's School of Communication, believe that citizens and stakeholders need to play an active role in formulating effective public policies and investments in greenhouse gas reduction. Their project, Mobilizing Citizen Support for Climate Stabilization and Adaptation Policies, investigates how best to engage Americans on climate control issues and analyzes the extent to which a health perspective can enlist community interest and participation. Through surveys and interviews, Drs. Maibach and Nisbet explore people's beliefs and motivations and test their reactions to various policy proposals and messages about climate change and its health implications. Their research findings could help galvanize the public health community and provide policy experts, government agencies, journalists, and other stakeholders with practical guidance on how best to increase public understanding of the implications of climate change.
230 | irish rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:39:55am |
re: #224 Spenser (with an S)
I honestly would send my Dad in Ferrysburg to help you, but he's also afraid of heights. You might, however, try their church Covenant Life. They've got a great bunch of retired guys who do those kind of projects and I'm sure they would help you.
They've been out to help me before :).
Unfortunately, they're backlogged... and we only have a couple of clear weather days on the map this week. I have to get this done quickly to avoid water damage.
231 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:41:50am |
re: #223 LudwigVanQuixote
Yeah I know... On the putting faith in it's place thread, someone was going on about creation ex-nihilo being logically stupid... Had it not been a holiday, I would have pointed out that creation ex nihilo is the backbone of field theory.
I am so torn on this issue just due to the fact that I am a committed Christian who also knows that the universe is 14B years old. I hate to see my fellow believers being made fun of but I want to shake some of them who believe the nonsense. I would love to have you sit down with a guy I know. He's got a Phd in biology from MIT and is a firm believer. He wrote a book on how science and faith can co-exist comfortably. His is not a squishy "I know there's a god somewhere and I want to live a good life", but a firm "Apostle's Creed"-type of faith, too.
232 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:45:45am |
re: #228 thedopefishlives
Alright. I'll buy that. I'm a computer scientist, not a physicist, although I did a little study in basic mechanics in college. So to me, the programming of the models is more of interest than the data they show - GIGO is a very applicable truism in computer modeling.
That is very true. That is why we try so very hard to make certain that no garbage goes in. There is not just one model. There is not just one programmer. There are over 50 major groups with dozens (sometimes hundreds) of people each working on this around the world. They each have their own code. They are all updated continuously by hundreds of thousands of data points taken continuously by hundreds of thousands of sensors around the world and dozens of satellites.
They all produce similar results. NAturally there is a high end and a low end of the predictions because of this. The important thing to take away is that the lowest end predictions are still very, very bad, and the high end are wrath of G-d.
233 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:46:36am |
Morning.
re: #229 Sharmuta
Their project, Mobilizing Citizen Support for Climate Stabilization and Adaptation Policies, investigates how best to engage Americans on climate control issues and analyzes the extent to which a health perspective can enlist community interest and participation.
Adaptation seems reasonable, but "Climate Stabilization"?
234 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:47:30am |
My daughter just came home with the new baby. He's a big guy, but not so big that the size 9mo pants my son-in-law brought over to the hospital don't sag on his tiny little tushie.
237 | irish rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:49:25am |
re: #234 Alouette
My daughter just came home with the new baby. He's a big guy, but not so big that the size 9mo pants my son-in-law brought over to the hospital don't sag on his tiny little tushie.
Congratulations, granny ;).
238 | McSpiff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:50:24am |
re: #234 Alouette
My daughter just came home with the new baby. He's a big guy, but not so big that the size 9mo pants my son-in-law brought over to the hospital don't sag on his tiny little tushie.
Wonderful news!
239 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:50:33am |
240 | McSpiff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:51:51am |
re: #239 Alouette
This is grandbaby #23. I am the Bubzilla!
You just beat my grandmother! Now the pressure is really going to be on me to just hurry up and find a nice girl ;-)
241 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:53:04am |
re: #240 McSpiff
You just beat my grandmother! Now the pressure is really going to be on me to just hurry up and find a nice girl ;-)
At least you're not the last in your family line, like me. ;)
242 | DaddyG Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:53:16am |
re: #93 Oh no...Sand People!
MSM propaganda of the day:
[Link: in.reuters.com...]
*facepalm*
I am eating more oatmeal and fewer Chick-fil-a biscuits. Perhaps I will look upon my economic lean years as a great blessing? //
243 | McSpiff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:54:49am |
re: #241 thedopefishlives
At least you're not the last in your family line, like me. ;)
I'm the oldest male with the family name, but not the only one. Last in line? Wayyy too much pressure.
244 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:55:33am |
re: #243 McSpiff
I'm the oldest male with the family name, but not the only one. Last in line? Wayyy too much pressure.
Yeah, exactly. Every time I go home, my grandmother asks me when the Mrs. Fish and I are going to start popping out babies. Geez, Grandma, it's not like I only just got married last year or anything.
245 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:55:50am |
re: #198 LudwigVanQuixote
Repost... So a denier who falsely claimed to be a physicist was brought to my attention. For your amusement. Also, this is why you should never claim to be a physicist when you aren't and then say bad science.
re: #557 Wondering Aloud
That would be called projection. Perhaps you should study physics.
Maybe the poster confused physics with phys. ed.?
246 | weimdog02 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:56:05am |
All of the sudden, it isn’t the “hottest period in 2000 years” anymore.
[Link: www.climateaudit.org...]
247 | njdhockeyfan Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:56:17am |
Good morning lizards!
Has this been posted yet?
Andy Williams accuses Barack Obama of following Marxist theory
Williams, a lifelong Republican whose hits include Moon River and Music To Watch Girls By, told the Radio Times he thought Mr Obama wanted to turn the US into a "socialist country".
The 81-year-old was a friend of the Kennedy family during the 1960s and was present at the Los Angeles rally where Robert F Kennedy was assassinated in 1968.
"I was very close to Bobby and he asked me to be a delegate for him when he ran for president," he said.
"He knew about me being a Republican, but just laughed and said, 'Sign yourself in as a Democrat and then change back afterwards'. Sadly, I never got to do that.
"I was very close to Teddy Kennedy, too, and his death recently brought it all back. What a tragedy. Had he lived, I think Bobby would have been a great president."
But Williams had a less favourable opinion of the current president.
"Don't like him at all," he said, "I think he wants to create a socialist country. The people he associates with are very Left-wing. One is registered as a Communist.
"Obama is following Marxist theory. He's taken over the banks and the car industry. He wants the country to fail."
248 | DaddyG Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:56:55am |
re: #241 thedopefishlives
At least you're not the last in your family line, like me. ;)
Don't take it too hard. Everyone is the last in their own genetic line until they breed.
249 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:56:59am |
re: #231 Spenser (with an S)
I am so torn on this issue just due to the fact that I am a committed Christian who also knows that the universe is 14B years old. I hate to see my fellow believers being made fun of but I want to shake some of them who believe the nonsense. I would love to have you sit down with a guy I know. He's got a Phd in biology from MIT and is a firm believer. He wrote a book on how science and faith can co-exist comfortably. His is not a squishy "I know there's a god somewhere and I want to live a good life", but a firm "Apostle's Creed"-type of faith, too.
The trick is to keep slowly but gently repeating that there is not a contradiction between science and faith if you are rational about them both.
I am an observant Jew. I have studied at Yeshiva and I read the scriptures in the original. I have not yet found any large objection that seems to show a conflict, that can not be answered by a better application of scriptural knowledge or scientific knowledge.
The issue from the other end is that because of the religious right , there is a meme in this country that science and faith are an either/or proposition. Science always wins in matters of science, so someone who is not well versed in theology, will of necessity, if (s)he buys that meme, will decide that faith is stupid.
This is greatly exacerbated by the frothing of the religious right. It used to be that atheists were content to day they do not believe and they did not usually feel the need to "return fire" with the same vitriol that comes out of the preachers. After too many years of crazy, we now have people like Dawkins who are almost on a mission of their own to discredit faith.
Now as people of faith, the answer to dealing with both side of this, is again in the scripture... Lead a good life and study hard. You can actually defeat a logical positivist argument if you know how. Logical positivism is not the only consistent world view. You will not be able to prove and they will not be able to disprove and the final point to be sought is one of mutual respect. If they see that you are intelligent, know your stuff and not frothing - and further do have answers to their philosophical challenges, they may not believe what you do, but hopefully they can accept that you are not crazy.
On the other end though, as people of faith, we can not let the word get perverted by hatefulness and ignorance. If we kept our own house more clean - as in actually cared about things like humility, compassion, good, deeds and honesty at all times, then we would not have such a backlash against those who claim to speak for us, hitting us.
250 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:57:17am |
re: #234 Alouette
My daughter just came home with the new baby. He's a big guy, but not so big that the size 9mo pants my son-in-law brought over to the hospital don't sag on his tiny little tushie.
MAZEL TOV!!!
251 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:57:25am |
Interesting opinion piece on the chief Islamic judge of the Palestinian Authority who states: "Jews have no history in the city of Jerusalem: They have never lived there, the Temple never existed, and Israeli archaeologists have admitted as much."
Read the whole thing. Your text to link...
252 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:58:18am |
re: #251 rwdflynavy
Funny they should say that, since didn't they uncover a wall or something during an accidental dig a while back? I remember someone linking a story to that effect.
253 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:59:51am |
PIMF
The trick is to keep slowly but gently repeating that there is not a contradiction between science and faith if you are rational about them both.
I am an observant Jew. I have studied at Yeshiva and I read the scriptures in the original. I have not yet found any large objection that seems to show a conflict, that can not be answered by a better application of scriptural knowledge or scientific knowledge.
The issue from the other end is that because of the religious right , there is a meme in this country that science and faith are an either/or proposition. Science always wins in matters of science, so someone who is not well versed in theology, will of necessity, if (s)he buys that meme, will decide that faith is stupid.
This is greatly exacerbated by the frothing of the religious right. It used to be that atheists were content to say they do not believe ,and they did not usually feel the need to "return fire" with the same vitriol that comes out of the preachers. After too many years of crazy, we now have people like Dawkins who are almost on a mission of their own to discredit faith.
Now as people of faith, the answer to dealing with both sides of this, is again in the scripture... Lead a good life and study hard. You can actually defeat a logical positivist argument if you know how. Logical positivism is not the only consistent world view. You will not be able to prove and they will not be able to disprove and the final point to be sought is one of mutual respect. If they see that you are intelligent, know your stuff and not frothing - and further do have answers to their philosophical challenges, they may not believe what you do, but hopefully they can accept that you are not crazy.
On the other end though, as people of faith, we can not let the word get perverted by hatefulness and ignorance. If we kept our own house more clean - as in actually cared about things like humility, compassion, good, deeds and honesty at all times, then we would not have such a backlash against those who claim to speak for us, hitting us.
254 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:00:06am |
re: #231 Spenser (with an S)
I am so torn on this issue just due to the fact that I am a committed Christian who also knows that the universe is 14B years old. I hate to see my fellow believers being made fun of but I want to shake some of them who believe the nonsense. I would love to have you sit down with a guy I know. He's got a Phd in biology from MIT and is a firm believer. He wrote a book on how science and faith can co-exist comfortably. His is not a squishy "I know there's a god somewhere and I want to live a good life", but a firm "Apostle's Creed"-type of faith, too.
Have you read Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship by John Polkinghorne?
255 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:00:09am |
re: #251 rwdflynavy
Interesting opinion piece on the chief Islamic judge of the Palestinian Authority who states: "Jews have no history in the city of Jerusalem: They have never lived there, the Temple never existed, and Israeli archaeologists have admitted as much."
Read the whole thing. Your text to link...
Don't even get me started.
256 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:00:32am |
re: #249 LudwigVanQuixote
After too many years of crazy, we now have people like Dawkins who are almost on a mission of their own to discredit faith.
Ding, ding, ding...! This drives me crazy with its unaware irony;
"I think my ultimate goal would be to convert people away from particular religions toward a rationalist skepticism, tinged with … no, that’s too weak," he said, correcting himself, "… glorying in the universe and in life. Yes, I would like people to be converted away from religion to skepticism."
-Richard Dawkins
257 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:03:19am |
re: #254 Pianobuff
Have you read Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship by John Polkinghorne?
No, I'll check it out. Thanks. The prof I mentioned above also wrote a book with his wife, a Phd in Astronomy from Harvard, but it was a very small print-run and I'm not sure how available it is.
258 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:04:16am |
re: #253 LudwigVanQuixote
The Rambam says that if you have a problem reconciling Torah with science, then you either don't understand science or you don't understand Torah.
BTW Ludwig are you familiar with the writings of Rabbi Nathan Slifkin on evolution?
259 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:04:22am |
re: #251 rwdflynavy
Interesting opinion piece on the chief Islamic judge of the Palestinian Authority who states: "Jews have no history in the city of Jerusalem: They have never lived there, the Temple never existed, and Israeli archaeologists have admitted as much."
Read the whole thing. Your text to link...
The oldest know reference to Israel... (1213 to 1203 BCE)...
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
There are a few revisionist archeologist who have moved some timeline by a few hundred years, but that doesn't change the basic facts that Israel has been in that area for a time much longer than the current population.
260 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:06:31am |
My daughter is getting all nervous that the house has gone all to hell while she was away, now she's threatening to mop the floor. My son-in-law just told her that if she can't stay in bed, at least go to the computer and go online.
261 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:06:53am |
re: #246 weimdog02
All of the sudden, it isn’t the “hottest period in 2000 years” anymore.
[Link: www.climateaudit.org...]
Really? He's arguing about how to make measurements from tree rings and he never even claims that.
How about you look at ohhh, I don't know... DIRECT TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENTS!
[Link: www.ncdc.noaa.gov...]
Now as to proxy data from past epochs, there is a lot more that goes into them than tree rings as well. Ice cores for instance as well as all manner of geological data.
262 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:08:02am |
re: #249 LudwigVanQuixote
people like Dawkins who are almost on a mission of their own to discredit faith.
Of course he already lost any credibility with me when he said this in an interview;
I (reporter) asked an obvious question: “As we speak of this shifting zeitgeist, how are we to determine who’s right? If we do not acknowledge some sort of external [standard], what is to prevent us from saying that the Muslim [extremists] aren’t right?”
“Yes, absolutely fascinating.” His response was immediate. “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question. But whatever [defines morality], it’s not the Bible. If it was, we’d be stoning people for breaking the Sabbath.”
263 | gonecamping Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:08:38am |
I'd certainly be skeptical of anyone trying to convert me from my beliefs.
re: #256 Spenser (with an S)
-Richard Dawkins
264 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:09:54am |
re: #182 theheat
I'm not arguing what he did was horrible. At the time, if it were my child, and I had the opportunity, I'd have offed him myself.
You always hear about people on death row repenting what they've done. I'm sure this epiphany was facilitated almost exclusively by their incarceration. Had they been roaming scot-free, most of them would probably not waste time to reflect.
In Polanski's case, this has been a monkey on his back for more than 30 years. Whether he was incarcerated or had fled justice, you know it's been on his mind. A better person would not have fled. Of course, a better person would not have done what he did. But the fact remains, he's quite aware of his crime, and he's conducted himself differently. I think that counts for something.
I don't hope he escapes justice. He strongly believe he needs to stand trial, and finally face that demon he's avoided the past thirty-some years. But if his victim herself has forgiven him, I don't think executing him at this moment in time serves any purpose other than to satisfy rage.
Just to clarify: he already stood for trial and was found guilty. He fled the country while awaiting the sentencing hearing, which is what he'll face if he's extradited, along with other charges related to his flight.
Execution is not even an option. California; statutory rape, which I believe had a maximum sentence of five years at the time the crime was committed; failure to appear for sentencing, unsure of the penalty but it's not execution. Not gonna happen.
266 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:11:58am |
re: #258 Alouette
The Rambam says that if you have a problem reconciling Torah with science, then you either don't understand science or you don't understand Torah.
BTW Ludwig are you familiar with the writings of Rabbi Nathan Slifkin on evolution?
Yes. I am familiar with him and I am appalled at how he was treated. I never got around to reading his books though. It's been on my to do list for a while.
And also, the Rambam said stronger.
He said:
What has been proven true can not be false by definition.
The word of Hashem can not be false.
Therefore, if what has been proven to be true contradicts your understanding of Torah, the only thing that can be wrong is your understanding of Torah.
267 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:13:26am |
re: #260 Alouette
Hah, my dear wife is a control freak and we moved while she was on bedrest and then delivering our twins. She had no idea where stuff was for months and if I hadn't sworn on the lives of our children that yes, the team of Dutch women who came from church to clean the house did a thorough job and none of the kids will get impetigo, she would have gotten up to do it again herself.
268 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:15:11am |
re: #262 Spenser (with an S)
TO be fair to Dawkins, he's actually making a much more subtle point. He is saying that the question of morality is a challenge to the atheist view and acknowledging that. He is positing that moral systems are something human generated and gets then that puts a limit on the authority of any moral system that one comes up with. This is incidentally at the root of much Nietzsche
269 | spinmore Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:20:18am |
re: #264 SixDegrees
Yea - the 'execution' thing was thrown out there for effect (or is that affect ?) . . . I guess the real point I was trying to make is: to defend this character in light of the crime is just crazy. For the victim to 'forgive' (my understanding is that there was some kind of monetary settlement) does not mean the State does not still have an interest in punishing the perp. The 'time elapsed' or 'living with guilt' or 'monkey on back for all these years' . . . So What!
270 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:20:20am |
LVQ - Have you seen the story this week about missing or unavailable Jones & Wigley data? Just wondering what your take is on it.
271 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:22:19am |
re: #268 LudwigVanQuixote
TO be fair to Dawkins, he's actually making a much more subtle point.
I understand, but I've got other people I'll spend my goodwill and benefit of the doubt on. He's intelligent, but not wise or good, IMHO.
Now, I've got to find that Ricky Gervais Hitler and Neitzsche bit.
/
272 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:23:46am |
re: #270 Pianobuff
LVQ - Have you seen the story this week about missing or unavailable Jones & Wigley data? Just wondering what your take is on it.
IIRC it was data from the eighties and early nineties that had been published, and now twenty years later, the original computer files have gone missing. These things happen. There is a lot more than just their data and it was already published and peer-reviewed at the time.
Some righty was giving me grief about this and I pointed out that Newton took data for his stuff, and we don't have all of his lab books anymore either...
273 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:24:05am |
re: #266 LudwigVanQuixote
Yes. I am familiar with him and I am appalled at how he was treated. I never got around to reading his books though. It's been on my to do list for a while.
I strongly recommend The Challenge of Creation. It is most definitely not the work of an "apikoris" (heretic). He even has disclaimers warning ultras of a certain denomination not to read his book, because their authorities don't approve of it. I think it is an excellent book.
274 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:26:47am |
Good morning all.
Talk about anger.
"It was a brutal and violent attack in which the victim was merely a bystander,"
Horrible.
275 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:29:01am |
re: #273 Alouette
I strongly recommend The Challenge of Creation. It is most definitely not the work of an "apikoris" (heretic). He even has disclaimers warning ultras of a certain denomination not to read his book, because their authorities don't approve of it. I think it is an excellent book.
Yes! I very much want to read it. It has been on my list for some time to get to.
And calling anyone an apikoris, without the most serious evidence of it (and of course he isn't!) particularly a rabbi, is the worst loshan ha ra possible. The people who were saying such slanders were apparently too holy to think that part of Torah still applied to themselves.
I have very little patience for certain types of our ultra far right. They should have a notion of chillul Hashem.
276 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:29:34am |
re: #274 FrogMarch
Good morning all.
Talk about anger.
Horrible.
Very horrible. I made the mistake of watching the video last night. It made me physically sick to my stomach.
277 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:33:52am |
re: #275 LudwigVanQuixote
Yes! I very much want to read it. It has been on my list for some time to get to.
And calling anyone an apikoris, without the most serious evidence of it (and of course he isn't!) particularly a rabbi, is the worst loshan ha ra possible. The people who were saying such slanders were apparently too holy to think that part of Torah still applied to themselves.
I have very little patience for certain types of our ultra far right. They should have a notion of chillul Hashem.
I wonder how many of our youth have gone "off the path" because no one could or would seriously answer questions they had about Torah and evolution.
Part of the problem is the acceptance in the yeshiva world, of "intelligent design" propaganda which was popularized in the 1970's by Rabbi Avigdor Miller. He cited Discovery Institute talking points, and Immanuel Velikovsky to "disprove" the facts of evolution.
278 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:35:29am |
Dan Riehl smacks down Glenn Beck at PJM...interesting confluence
279 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:36:57am |
280 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:39:23am |
re: #277 Alouette
I wonder how many of our youth have gone "off the path" because no one could or would seriously answer questions they had about Torah and evolution.
Yes, I've heard it called the "God of the gaps" theory, which is very dangerous. Say Susie grows up only hearing a 6-day creation time-line. She then goes to university and takes science courses where she learns that, obviously, the earth is billions of years old. She may just chuck the whole thing as fairytales if she isn't prepared for a G-d big enough to create within the mechanisms He just put in place.
281 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:39:37am |
re: #278 albusteve
Dan Riehl smacks down Glenn Beck at PJM...interesting confluence
When the ridiculous meets the sublime...
/Sub-something, for sure, but I can't quite put my finger on it
282 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:42:23am |
re: #277 Alouette
I wonder how many of our youth have gone "off the path" because no one could or would seriously answer questions they had about Torah and evolution.
Part of the problem is the acceptance in the yeshiva world, of "intelligent design" propaganda which was popularized in the 1970's by Rabbi Avigdor Miller. He cited Discovery Institute talking points, and Immanuel Velikovsky to "disprove" the facts of evolution.
How can anyone take Immanuel Velikovsky seriously. He also believes that electromagnetic effects played an important role in celestial mechanics. He also proposed a revised chronology for ancient Egypt, Greece, Israel and other cultures of the ancient Near East.
Actually, there is a whole list of "junk science" that he taught. Really, he was a another Von Daniken.
283 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:43:03am |
re: #282 Walter L. Newton
How can anyone take Immanuel Velikovsky seriously. He also believes that electromagnetic effects played an important role in celestial mechanics. He also proposed a revised chronology for ancient Egypt, Greece, Israel and other cultures of the ancient Near East.
Actually, there is a whole list of "junk science" that he taught. Really, he was a another Von Daniken.
Er, a link, just in case you have nothing to do.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
284 | badger1970 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:43:55am |
re: #276 Danny
The LA Riots were bad enough. Prayers go out to the family and friends. It sounds like he was making the most of what he had and succeeding.
285 | Dreader1962 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:44:18am |
I had watched the Logic vs. Faith video and appreciated it, but didn't go back to the comments in time to see RadCap's valiant efforts. I read his first post and didn't need to go any further:
...it presumes that 'this world' is properly the object of cognition; it presumes the senses are valid perceivers of 'true' reality; etc etc. Many do not hold to these premises.
That's right - walk off that cliff. Don't pay attention to your nose smelling the salt spray, your ears perceiving the crashing surf below, your eyes perceiving no ground to walk on, your feeling of vertigo as gravity begins its inexorable pull downwards ... and the bitter taste of fear as you realize you should not have had faith in my instruction to walk off the cliff!
286 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:44:26am |
287 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:45:04am |
re: #277 Alouette
I wonder how many of our youth have gone "off the path" because no one could or would seriously answer questions they had about Torah and evolution.
Part of the problem is the acceptance in the yeshiva world, of "intelligent design" propaganda which was popularized in the 1970's by Rabbi Avigdor Miller. He cited Discovery Institute talking points, and Immanuel Velikovsky to "disprove" the facts of evolution.
And Gerald Schroeder keeps it up to this day. From a Kiruv point of view it is an even more dramatic issue.
Suppose you have some kid from a secular background who is bright and well educated. Suppose (s)he is finally curious about the Heritage. Now imagine that some really good hearted rabbi is there with some wonderful Torah, that if this kid heard, it would change that kid's life.
But alas, that rabbi says something stupid about science. He is automatically labeled an idiot in the mind of that kid, and whatever beautiful the Torah the rabbi would give over, will now also bee seen as the words of a fool.
As to observant kids leaving because of people refusing to be good with science, we have a Midrash for that which really says it all. You know the one with how the serpent got Eve to eat the apple?
The story goes that Hashem tells Adam, don't eat the fruit or you will die. Now Adam, wants to make a fence around the law, so he tells Eve, "don't touch the tree or you will die."
The serpent tries to tempt Eve, she says are you kidding, "if I touch the tree, I'll die." The serpent pushes her into it and asks "what else were you lied to about?"
Same thing here. You get observant kids who learn the science and realize that they were lied to about it. From there all sorts of other questions naturally follow.
If you are a Jew, you believe that Hashem made the universe according to His rules. It follows then that to lie about the universe is to lie about the will of Hashem, and nothing good can come of trying to say that His will was anything other than what it is.
288 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:46:23am |
re: #282 Walter L. Newton
How can anyone take Immanuel Velikovsky seriously. He also "believes that electromagnetic effects played an important role in celestial mechanics. He also proposed a revised chronology for ancient Egypt, Greece, Israel and other cultures of the ancient Near East."
Actually, there is a whole list of "junk science" that he taught. Really, he was a another Von Daniken.
fixed.
;-)
289 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:46:26am |
re: #282 Walter L. Newton
How can anyone take Immanuel Velikovsky seriously. He also believes that electromagnetic effects played an important role in celestial mechanics. He also proposed a revised chronology for ancient Egypt, Greece, Israel and other cultures of the ancient Near East.
Actually, there is a whole list of "junk science" that he taught. Really, he was a another Von Daniken.
No question, Velikovsky was a freaking moonbat. And yet ignorant yeshiva youth have been misled by a rabbi claiming that Velikovsky was a "scientist" because supposedly his books claim there was a literal flood, confirming the Noah/Gilgamesh narrative.
290 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:48:27am |
re: #287 LudwigVanQuixote
And Gerald Schroeder keeps it up to this day. From a Kiruv point of view it is an even more dramatic issue.
Suppose you have some kid from a secular background who is bright and well educated. Suppose (s)he is finally curious about the Heritage. Now imagine that some really good hearted rabbi is there with some wonderful Torah, that if this kid heard, it would change that kid's life.
But alas, that rabbi says something stupid about science. He is automatically labeled an idiot in the mind of that kid, and whatever beautiful the Torah the rabbi would give over, will now also bee seen as the words of a fool.
As to observant kids leaving because of people refusing to be good with science, we have a Midrash for that which really says it all. You know the one with how the serpent got Eve to eat the apple?
The story goes that Hashem tells Adam, don't eat the fruit or you will die. Now Adam, wants to make a fence around the law, so he tells Eve, "don't touch the tree or you will die."
The serpent tries to tempt Eve, she says are you kidding, "if I touch the tree, I'll die." The serpent pushes her into it and asks "what else were you lied to about?"
Same thing here. You get observant kids who learn the science and realize that they were lied to about it. From there all sorts of other questions naturally follow.
If you are a Jew, you believe that Hashem made the universe according to His rules. It follows then that to lie about the universe is to lie about the will of Hashem, and nothing good can come of trying to say that His will was anything other than what it is.
I haven't even skimmed Schroeder's later books, but his earlier ones seem to accept scientific evidence; more of the "theistic evolution" model (that says G-d guided creation, as it followed what we see in the scientific evidence) than ID (which says it required miracles.)
291 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:49:06am |
re: #289 Alouette
No question, Velikovsky was a freaking moonbat. And yet ignorant yeshiva youth have been misled by a rabbi claiming that Velikovsky was a "scientist" because supposedly his books claim there was a literal flood, confirming the Noah/Gilgamesh narrative.
Ah, you said Noah/Gilgamesh, you know your history.
292 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:50:12am |
re: #286 Danny
I can't even imagine. Such a senseless act of savagery. At least they caught the killers.
I hear ya.
I cannot imagine either. Sadly, the killers young lives are trashed now too. Teens killing teens. What a waste.
293 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:50:18am |
re: #289 Alouette
No question, Velikovsky was a freaking moonbat. And yet ignorant yeshiva youth have been misled by a rabbi claiming that Velikovsky was a "scientist" because supposedly his books claim there was a literal flood, confirming the Noah/Gilgamesh narrative.
A long time ago, Analog Science Fiction ran a special Velikovsky issue. It had a very poor anti-Velikovsky article by Isaac Asimov, that largely attacked Velikovsky himself. However, the pro-Velikovsky article convinced me that he had his head up his ass in terms of science. It says something that the article taking one side of an issue convinces me that the side it supports is completely incorrect.
294 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:50:44am |
295 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:52:20am |
Since we're on the subject, the Chabad rabbi told a joke on Yom Kippur about evolution.
A child asks her mother where people came from. Her mother tells her about G-d, Adam and Eve, etc.
Then she asks her father, who tells her we came from monkeys.
Confused, she asks her mother again, who says "I was telling you about my side of the family; your father was telling you about his."
296 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:52:38am |
re: #293 Kosh's Shadow
A long time ago, Analog Science Fiction ran a special Velikovsky issue. It had a very poor anti-Velikovsky article by Isaac Asimov, that largely attacked Velikovsky himself. However, the pro-Velikovsky article convinced me that he had his head up his ass in terms of science. It says something that the article taking one side of an issue convinces me that the side it supports is completely incorrect.
Hey, when I was a teen, books like his "Worlds in Collision" had me convinced. I had over 1000 books of that sort of junk science by the time I was in my 30's.
All gone now.
297 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:54:29am |
re: #290 Kosh's Shadow
I haven't even skimmed Schroeder's later books, but his earlier ones seem to accept scientific evidence; more of the "theistic evolution" model (that says G-d guided creation, as it followed what we see in the scientific evidence) than ID (which says it required miracles.)
IN his later years he's gone seriously off the derech as a scientist.
As to Theistic evolution.. well sure, in some sense that is what I believe too in as much as I believe that Hashem made the universe and it's rules and evolution is a mechanism of this universe.
However, Schroeder stretches science (even in his earlier books) in an attempt to scientifically prove Hashem, exists. This is a flawed approach already from a Jewish view, because we teach that Hashem gives us free will and that He hides His face.
Simply put... If you ever found galaxies in a mega parsec gravity defying orbit that said in giant Hebrew letters "Made by Hashem, Day Three, patent pending" it would destroy our choice to believe in Him - and He already made clear He wasn't going to do that.
298 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:56:15am |
re: #210 LudwigVanQuixote
You use "G-d" in your writing. May I ask why you don't simply write "God"? This seemingly arbitrary dropping of a vowel has always perplexed me.
299 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:57:00am |
re: #298 cenotaphium
You use "G-d" in your writing. May I ask why you don't simply write "God"? This seemingly arbitrary dropping of a vowel has always perplexed me.
It's a form of respect to the Deity not to write His name in full. Many non-Jews here use the same convention, out of deference to them.
300 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:57:29am |
re: #296 Walter L. Newton
Hey, when I was a teen, books like his "Worlds in Collision" had me convinced. I had over 1000 books of that sort of junk science by the time I was in my 30's.
All gone now.
Well, I read it after I had a couple of college physics courses, so I could see what was wrong.
That's a good reason for early science education.
301 | DaddyG Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:58:50am |
re: #263 gonecamping
I'd certainly be skeptical of anyone trying to convert me from my beliefs.
You can't really believe that? ///
302 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:59:15am |
re: #294 Walter L. Newton
Smart-ass :)
That's me.
Interesting topic - btw. Don't know much about catastrophists.
303 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 6:59:29am |
re: #299 thedopefishlives
Okay. But.. isn't that supposed to include all variation of the names of the deity? I assume it's different for Christians, since I've never seen J-sus (or something to that effect) used?
304 | DaddyG Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:00:29am |
re: #299 thedopefishlives
It's a form of respect to the Deity not to write His name in full. Many non-Jews here use the same convention, out of deference to them.
I understand and respect that. I do have a question about it. Is "God" considered a title, a name or both in Jewish tradition? How about other faiths represented here?
305 | weimdog02 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:00:37am |
re: #261 LudwigVanQuixote
Maybe so, but Hansen and the rest were cooking the books and cherry picking data to support their thesis. This is a problem. Any work based on these findings (which are many I suspect) are now questionable as well. Not to mention the fact that this supporting information was held back and wasn't subject to review until only recently (this month). This is all very unscientific and very troubling at the very least don't you think?
306 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:01:13am |
307 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:01:25am |
re: #298 cenotaphium
You use "G-d" in your writing. May I ask why you don't simply write "God"? This seemingly arbitrary dropping of a vowel has always perplexed me.
Force of habit. In Jewish law, the name of G-d is always taken as something to be treated with the greatest respect. For one thing, if you write it, you have to be very careful that it does not get erased. So, in general writing, Jews will often abbreviate names of G-d to prevent that from happening.
Either that, or we write Hashem, which literally means "the Name" as a place holder for a name of G-d.
Now the word "god" itself, is not even a Hebrew word and it is no more one of His names than saying deity. However, it has become tradition to drop the vowel in the word for the same reasons and I do it out of force of habit, particularly when I am writing with other observant Jews around, because they expect to see it.
308 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:02:42am |
re: #300 Kosh's Shadow
That's a good reason for early science education.
Absolutely. My daughter is wicked-smart and loves science. The Christian school she goes to teaches science in the science classes while amazing the kids with how great G-d is to wrap around into their religion classes. Even if I believed in a 6-day creation, I would push her toward learning all the accepted science because I want her to be a scientist if she wants to.
/And a scholarship would be nice, too :)
309 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:04:29am |
re: #307 LudwigVanQuixote
Are there people who take offense when it is spelled out by non-Jews?
310 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:04:55am |
re: #308 Spenser (with an S)
Absolutely. My daughter is wicked-smart and loves science. The Christian school she goes to teaches science in the science classes while amazing the kids with how great G-d is to wrap around into their religion classes. Even if I believed in a 6-day creation, I would push her toward learning all the accepted science because I want her to be a scientist if she wants to.
/And a scholarship would be nice, too :)
don't you live in Michigan?
311 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:05:23am |
re: #297 LudwigVanQuixote
IN his later years he's gone seriously off the derech as a scientist.
As to Theistic evolution.. well sure, in some sense that is what I believe too in as much as I believe that Hashem made the universe and it's rules and evolution is a mechanism of this universe.
However, Schroeder stretches science (even in his earlier books) in an attempt to scientifically prove Hashem, exists. This is a flawed approach already from a Jewish view, because we teach that Hashem gives us free will and that He hides His face.
Simply put... If you ever found galaxies in a mega parsec gravity defying orbit that said in giant Hebrew letters "Made by Hashem, Day Three, patent pending" it would destroy our choice to believe in Him - and He already made clear He wasn't going to do that.
Thank you.
Aryeh Kaplan has discussed the age of the universe, at least, and shows how kabbalists determined the universe to be 15.5 billion years old.
A thin volume of some of his writings that discuss this is Kabbalah and the Age of the Universe.
This is really not a book trying to reconcile the two models of Creation, but to discuss the Kabbalistic one, which not all who study Kabbalah accept (for example, Chabad rabbis believe in 6 days of Creation, with the universe already billions of years old when it was created.)
As for a galaxy spelling this out, I had been more thinking that if we somehow converted the fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background into sound, we'd hear "Bereshit bara Elokim et ha-shamaym v'et ha-aretz." etc.
(The opening of Genesis in Hebrew, transliterated, for those lizards who don't know.)
312 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:05:36am |
re: #307 LudwigVanQuixote
Great explanation. Thanks.
The power word idea seems prevalent in cultural history as well. Isn't it the pivotal part in the story of the Golem?
313 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:07:29am |
re: #303 cenotaphium
Okay. But.. isn't that supposed to include all variation of the names of the deity? I assume it's different for Christians, since I've never seen J-sus (or something to that effect) used?
To Jews, it is considered disrespectful to write His name in an ephemeral medium. Anything with His name must be treated with respect, and cannot just be thrown out, for example, but must be buried if it is no longer in condition to be used.
I can't speak for Christians.
314 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:08:46am |
re: #307 LudwigVanQuixote
Force of habit. In Jewish law, the name of G-d is always taken as something to be treated with the greatest respect. For one thing, if you write it, you have to be very careful that it does not get erased. So, in general writing, Jews will often abbreviate names of G-d to prevent that from happening.
Either that, or we write Hashem, which literally means "the Name" as a place holder for a name of G-d.
Now the word "god" itself, is not even a Hebrew word and it is no more one of His names than saying deity. However, it has become tradition to drop the vowel in the word for the same reasons and I do it out of force of habit, particularly when I am writing with other observant Jews around, because they expect to see it.
I use it if I am referring to G-d only, as it is an English translation, but not when using the word to refer to other entities.
315 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:11:19am |
re: #305 weimdog02
Maybe so, but Hansen and the rest were cooking the books and cherry picking data to support their thesis.
Excuse me! That is one of the worst and most terrible claims anyone can ake about a scientist. Hansen has never cooked any books. If you make such a claim you had better be able to prove it. Just because some political blog was trying to sear him does not mean it happened. Hansen's work is fully peer reviewed. Also give that it was Hansen who became the darling of the right by telling Bush's political minders to go to hell, if Hansen had ever cooked anything, you can be certain it would be national news, not some evil smear in the blogosphere.
Further there are tens of thousands of scientists other than Hansen who tell the same story.
This is a problem. Any work based on these findings (which are many I suspect) are now questionable as well.
Why, his work is solid.
Not to mention the fact that this supporting information was held back and wasn't subject to review until only recently (this month). This is all very unscientific and very troubling at the very least don't you think?
You do realize that Hansen has nothing to do with Mann right? As to the McKintyre Mann debate, unless you want to get into som very detailed discussions about tree rings, and some even more detailed debates about how to represent data, there is not much to say without any authority.
The answer is, it doesn't trouble me at all because if you want evidence of CO2 concentrations rising, we don't need tree rings. We have been directly measuring it for years optically.
Look at these Keeling Curves. This is direct spectral measurement.
[Link: scrippsco2.ucsd.edu...]
[Link: earthguide.ucsd.edu...]
Further we use ice cores and all sorts of other data sets that also tell a consistent picture. Look at this for a detailed discussion of the sorts of things that get done and their history.
[Link: www.aip.org...]
316 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:12:06am |
re: #308 Spenser (with an S)
Absolutely. My daughter is wicked-smart and loves science. The Christian school she goes to teaches science in the science classes while amazing the kids with how great G-d is to wrap around into their religion classes. Even if I believed in a 6-day creation, I would push her toward learning all the accepted science because I want her to be a scientist if she wants to.
May I ask why you sent your child to a Christian school specifically?
In Sweden, the only people you hear about wanting a religiously focused education are.. well, pretty nuts. You seem like a resonable sort however, which is why I am curious.
317 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:12:12am |
re: #309 Danny
Are there people who take offense when it is spelled out by non-Jews?
I hope not!
But I have to say that seeing non-Jewish lizards type it that way as a sign of respect was deeply touching to me.
318 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:12:35am |
re: #311 Kosh's Shadow
I had been more thinking that if we somehow converted the fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background into sound, we'd hear "Bereshit bara Elokim et ha-shamaym v'et ha-aretz."
Sorry, I already did that. And in fact it says, "Do not attempt to adjust your television..."
319 | katemaclaren Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:12:50am |
re: #313 Kosh's Shadow
Kosh, what does your nic mean? I've always been curious.
320 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:14:17am |
re: #312 cenotaphium
Great explanation. Thanks.
The power word idea seems prevalent in cultural history as well. Isn't it the pivotal part in the story of the Golem?
Yes it is. There is a vast amount to be said by the tradition about names and the power of names and the meaning of names on a spiritual level. It is a fascinating topic and it would take me many more hours than I have today, to even begin to justice to it.
But one short thing is that Hashem has many names and they all tell you something about His aspects.
321 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:14:34am |
re: #317 LudwigVanQuixote
I hope not!
But I have to say that seeing non-Jewish lizards type it that way as a sign of respect was deeply touching to me.
And I do hope you realize that my NOT doing it is NOT intended as disrespect.
322 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:14:43am |
re: #316 cenotaphium
May I ask why you sent your child to a Christian school specifically?
In Sweden, the only people you hear about wanting a religiously focused education are.. well, pretty nuts. You seem like a resonable sort however, which is why I am curious.
A Hebrew here, with my oldest daughter in a private religious school: The public school system in the US is very unsatisfactory to many parents. Student achievement is very poor, classes tend to be too large, and teachers and administrators are too busy trying to deal with the fallout from bad family situations to be able to devote much time to actual instruction.
323 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:15:16am |
324 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:15:24am |
re: #318 Occasional Reader
Sorry, I already did that. And in fact it says, "Do not attempt to adjust your television..."
There is nothing wrong with your television. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are now controlling the transmission. We control the horizontal and the vertical. We can deluge you with a thousand channels or expand one single image to crystal clarity and beyond. We can shape your vision to anything our imagination can conceive. For the next hour we will control all that you see and hear. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits.
325 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:16:27am |
re: #322 Guanxi88
The public school system in the US is very unsatisfactory to many parents. Student achievement is very poor,
This depends enormously on location, of course. There are also very good public schools out there.
326 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:16:36am |
re: #319 katemaclaren
Kosh, what does your nic mean? I've always been curious.
It is from Babylon 5
In that TV series, there were two ancient races who stayed to help younger races advance. One such race are the Vorlons. They believe in strict order to advance. The only Vorlons we meet are the ambassadors to Babylon 5, and they are both called Kosh.
The other race are the Shadows. They believe in advancement by chaos, causing interplanetary wars.
My nic is a combination of the two.
327 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:17:06am |
re: #320 LudwigVanQuixote
Yes it is. There is a vast amount to be said by the tradition about names and the power of names and the meaning of names on a spiritual level. It is a fascinating topic and it would take me many more hours than I have today, to even begin to justice to it.
But one short thing is that Hashem has many names and they all tell you something about His aspects.
It is said the entire Torah is made up of His names.
328 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:17:22am |
we need more Porn Police...maybe a whole new Department of Porn Control...porn czars etc
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
329 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:17:54am |
re: #322 Guanxi88
A Hebrew here, with my oldest daughter in a private religious school: The public school system in the US is very unsatisfactory to many parents. Student achievement is very poor, classes tend to be too large, and teachers and administrators are too busy trying to deal with the fallout from bad family situations to be able to devote much time to actual instruction.
The part about public schools makes sense. However, surely there are more secular private schools than religious private schools?
Maybe it's my idea of a religious school that's warped? I keep imagining most topics influenced or described in relation to the religion, instead of just sticking to the facts.
330 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:17:58am |
re: #327 Kosh's Shadow
It is said the entire Torah is made up of His names.
So it's basically a phone book?
/
331 | Irish Rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:18:13am |
I'm a Christian, but I'm at a place in my life where I have nothing but disgust for organized religion.
I doubt that I'll ever walk into a church again.
332 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:18:31am |
re: #325 Occasional Reader
This depends enormously on location, of course. There are also very good public schools out there.
Why I specified "to many parents". Me, I had a public education, but it was a different time and in a very different place. Where we live now, a public education would more or less double or triple our kids' chances of getting shanked, shot, pregnant, or probation.
333 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:18:33am |
re: #330 Occasional Reader
So it's basically a phone book?
/
Not exactly, since they all refer to the same entity, just different aspects, and they all have the same address and phone number.
334 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:18:39am |
re: #323 Spenser (with an S)
Yes.
free in state college program?...my niece is up there but I've forgotten the details
335 | bosforus Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:18:45am |
Good morning lizard army. Not sure what happened last night but I'm a wee bit more tired than I usually am in the morning. Still wiping the crusties out of my eyes.
336 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:19:20am |
re: #321 Occasional Reader
And I do hope you realize that my NOT doing it is NOT intended as disrespect.
Never even crossed my mind I promise.
337 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:19:26am |
re: #316 cenotaphium
May I ask why you sent your child to a Christian school specifically?
In Sweden, the only people you hear about wanting a religiously focused education are.. well, pretty nuts. You seem like a resonable sort however, which is why I am curious.
Quite a few Lizards send their kids to religious schools. I'm one.
338 | Silvergirl Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:19:53am |
re: #316 cenotaphium
May I ask why you sent your child to a Christian school specifically?
In Sweden, the only people you hear about wanting a religiously focused education are.. well, pretty nuts. You seem like a resonable sort however, which is why I am curious.
Somehow I doubt that that can be true for Sweden. The only people there who want a religious focused education are nuts? Someone here could say that and it isn't true here either.
Fanaticism on any subject leads a person into the nuts category, but a parent opting for a Christian based education doesn't need to be branded so fast.
339 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:19:58am |
re: #337 MandyManners
Morning, Mandy. Hope The Kid isn't coughing his lungs up today.
340 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:20:03am |
re: #316 cenotaphium
May I ask why you sent your child to a Christian school specifically?
In Sweden, the only people you hear about wanting a religiously focused education are.. well, pretty nuts. You seem like a resonable sort however, which is why I am curious.
Sure. I can't speak to all religious education, but ours is excellent and very Christ-focused at the same time. We are from a reformed tradition, which holds that Christians should be found in most aspects of society so we feel that both are important. It is expensive, but our church helps out and the test scores are way above the public schools in my city, even the "rich" schools.
341 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:20:06am |
re: #337 MandyManners
Quite a few Lizards send their kids to religious schools. I'm one.
AMERICAN TALIBAN! ! ! !
/
342 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:20:07am |
re: #329 cenotaphium
The part about public schools makes sense. However, surely there are more secular private schools than religious private schools?
Maybe it's my idea of a religious school that's warped? I keep imagining most topics influenced or described in relation to the religion, instead of just sticking to the facts.
Weird thing is, that the private schools here are almost exclusively religiously affiliated. I'd never really thought about it till you brought it up, but, yeah, most of the private schools are religiously affiliated. I'm excluding the college-preparatory academies and such - these do not conform to the overall pattern.
344 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:20:51am |
re: #328 albusteve
Paid to watch porn? Sounds like an exhausting job.
Seriously though, I've never understood how someone can have the arrogance to porn surf on any job, let alone public offical's jobs. Just the casual surfing distractions ought to be enough waste of paid time, I think?
345 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:21:18am |
re: #326 Kosh's Shadow
Did the Vorlons and Shadows ever "rumble"?
346 | reine.de.tout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:21:26am |
re: #316 cenotaphium
May I ask why you sent your child to a Christian school specifically?
In Sweden, the only people you hear about wanting a religiously focused education are.. well, pretty nuts. You seem like a resonable sort however, which is why I am curious.
In at least some "Christian" schools (for instance the Catholic school my daughter attends), the education itself re: #329 cenotaphium
The part about public schools makes sense. However, surely there are more secular private schools than religious private schools?
Maybe it's my idea of a religious school that's warped? I keep imagining most topics influenced or described in relation to the religion, instead of just sticking to the facts.
is not "religiously focused" - the classes and courses are the same as what exists in public schools, but the day WILL include a "religion" class whereas there is no such thing in the public schools.
347 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:22:01am |
re: #311 Kosh's Shadow
And Aryeh Kaplan is something totally different from Schroeder on every level.
I love Kaplan.
348 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:22:12am |
re: #334 albusteve
free in state college program?...my niece is up there but I've forgotten the details
I think your niece must live in the city limits of Kalamazoo. They had a big gift there a couple of years ago for them specifically.
349 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:22:30am |
re: #345 Occasional Reader
Did the Vorlons and Shadows ever "rumble"?
Only through most of season two and three...
350 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:22:40am |
re: #316 cenotaphium
May I ask why you sent your child to a Christian school specifically?
In Sweden, the only people you hear about wanting a religiously focused education are.. well, pretty nuts. You seem like a resonable sort however, which is why I am curious.
(just jumping in...)
The wacky religious types give all religion a bad stereotype. My parents pulled me out of public school and opted to send me to a very good private school that happened to be Lutheran. (We were not Lutheran) I can tell you from personal experience that my education was a million times better than the education I was receiving at the local public school. Although, as a young child in 4th grade-8th grade - I hated the 1 hour bus ride across town. After a few years in the private school, I went back to the public school. I regret that decision to this very day.
Our public school system is problematic, often depending where you live and what school district you are in. I beleive in a strong public school system - one that rewards excellence. Sadly, becasue our public school system is run by a monopoly, we have big problems with accountability and quality control. Parents should have more choices.
351 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:23:08am |
352 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:23:52am |
353 | spinmore Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:23:59am |
re: #344 cenotaphium
Paid to watch porn? Sounds like an exhausting job.
Seriously though, I've never understood how someone can have the arrogance to porn surf on any job, let alone public offical's jobs. Just the casual surfing distractions ought to be enough waste of paid time, I think?
Can they just 'do it' till they get free eyeglasses in the Public Option?
354 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:24:30am |
re: #346 reine.de.tout
but the day WILL include a "religion" class whereas there is no such thing in the public schools.
Are you saying there is a comparative religion class, or a religion specific class? And are you saying there's not a comparative religion class in public schools at all?
355 | bosforus Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:24:45am |
356 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:24:50am |
357 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:24:52am |
re: #339 thedopefishlives
Morning, Mandy. Hope The Kid isn't coughing his lungs up today.
It seems to have passed through his respiratory system very quickly and quietly. All we're dealing with is the fever.
358 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:25:20am |
re: #350 FrogMarch
[snip]
...Sadly, becasue our public school system is run by a monopoly, we have big problems with accountability and quality control. Parents should have more choices.
Don't worry, public health care will be better.
/
359 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:25:32am |
re: #344 cenotaphium
Paid to watch porn? Sounds like an exhausting job.
My Constitutional Law professor in law school had clerked for Justice Thurgood Marshall, back at a time when the US Supreme Court was (basically) trying to figure out whether/to what degree pornography was protected free speech. During those days, as he put it, the Supreme Court was "awash in smut", and he was treated to the spectacle of these mostly elderly Justices peering at absolutely disgusting porn films, while taking careful notes. He related how he'd call down to the archives, and say "Justice Marshall is requesting that you send up Exhibit #1211", and the archivist would reply, "no, you don't want THAT one... get Exhibit #2422 instead, that one's REALLY hot!".
360 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:25:32am |
361 | reine.de.tout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:25:48am |
re: #354 cenotaphium
Are you saying there is a comparative religion class, or a religion specific class? And are you saying there's not a comparative religion class in public schools at all?
At the Catholic school, the religion class focuses on Catholicism.
I am unaware of any public schools that have comparative religion classes in school. They may exist somewhere, but not where I am.
362 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:25:49am |
363 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:25:57am |
364 | reine.de.tout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:26:07am |
365 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:26:21am |
re: #348 Spenser (with an S)
I think your niece must live in the city limits of Kalamazoo. They had a big gift there a couple of years ago for them specifically.
she does...state wide?...what was I thinking
366 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:26:26am |
367 | Silvergirl Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:26:54am |
re: #351 Alouette
I have to bow out of the thread and become productive, but I say, "Send that beautiful baby photo to the top ten comments."
368 | Walter L. Newton Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:27:18am |
369 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:27:35am |
re: #358 Walter L. Newton
Don't worry, public health care will be better.
/
ack!
What the democrats are trying to push on us will be a disaster. These people have no clue how to reform health care.
371 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:27:55am |
re: #307 LudwigVanQuixote
Force of habit. In Jewish law, the name of G-d is always taken as something to be treated with the greatest respect. For one thing, if you write it, you have to be very careful that it does not get erased. So, in general writing, Jews will often abbreviate names of G-d to prevent that from happening.
Either that, or we write Hashem, which literally means "the Name" as a place holder for a name of G-d.
Now the word "god" itself, is not even a Hebrew word and it is no more one of His names than saying deity. However, it has become tradition to drop the vowel in the word for the same reasons and I do it out of force of habit, particularly when I am writing with other observant Jews around, because they expect to see it.
When writing the English G-d, what do Jews natively have in mind? Elohim, Adonai, the tetragrammaton?
372 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:27:59am |
re: #368 Walter L. Newton
Adorable, does it come with a warrantee?
Guaranteed to pee, poop, eat and cry.
373 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:28:10am |
re: #366 MandyManners
Hey, sailor. Wanna' see my burkha?
Ah, so you're a classical conservative, I see, in the tradition of Edmund Burkha.
374 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:28:19am |
re: #359 Occasional Reader
That's.. wow.. that's hilarious actually. In another way, not so much.
375 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:29:16am |
re: #373 Occasional Reader
Ah, so you're a classical conservative, I see, in the tradition of Edmund Burkha.
Ouch! But I updinged you anyway!
376 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:30:23am |
re: #329 cenotaphium
There is a huge swing in the quality of public schools here and the ones my kids would go to (based on our address) are bad. They have many good teachers but are mostly treading water. Our school has a very diverse grouping ethnically and economically which is nice. The parents are incredibly involved and we've had some very generous alumnus who enable us to have a great campus with excellent equipment.
377 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:33:25am |
Lucy Vodden, who provided the inspiration for the Beatles' classic song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds," has died after a long battle with lupus. She was 46.
interesting little story for Beatles factistas
378 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:33:57am |
re: #371 Pianobuff
When writing the English G-d, what do Jews natively have in mind? Elohim, Adonai, the tetragrammaton?
I think Adonai
379 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:34:03am |
re: #377 albusteve
Lucy Vodden, who provided the inspiration for the Beatles' classic song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds," has died after a long battle with lupus. She was 46.
interesting little story for Beatles factistas
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
380 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:34:24am |
re: #374 cenotaphium
That's.. wow.. that's hilarious actually. In another way, not so much.
He had another great (and similar) anecdote about one particular case, involving someone who had been arrested for possession of obscene material, mostly movies. Two issues had made it up to the Supreme Court level: One, whether the material was protected free speech, based on it having some sort of "artistic" or other value; Two, whether the seizure of the material had constituted an illegal search and seizure.
So the Justices actually screened one of the films, and as my Con. Law professor put it, "I can't even describe to you what was in this movie, even though you're all adults... it was simply the most disgusting thing I've ever seen in my life." The Justices stared in stunned silence.. and then Marshall's deep, booming laughter is heard in the back. "Well, boys... I guess we're gonna be deciding this one on 'search & seizure' grounds..."
381 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:34:31am |
re: #373 Occasional Reader
Ah, so you're a classical conservative, I see, in the tradition of Edmund Burkha.
You are de Maistre of Puns, my friend!
382 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:34:36am |
re: #378 Guanxi88
I think Adonai
Let me clarify - when I write that, Adonai is what I sorta have in mind most of the time.
384 | Unions = Innovation slash slash Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:35:15am |
My oldest (15) is also in a Private Christian School. Much better than his local school. Sad thing is that he was in the Magnet (gifted program) and was accepted to our Magnet high school that is routinely ranked in the top 5 for high schools in the US. My son is just too lazy for his own good and we knew he'd be eaten alive in that hypercompetitive environment. So we pay instead.
385 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:35:22am |
re: #350 FrogMarch
Very interesting.
How would you suggest a public school service be handled without it being a monopoly situation? I know we have similar problems here in Sweden, and one of the proposed solutions (besides ever-present attempts to bring in more accountability and efficiency at all levels) is to have schools with blended economies - partly state subsidised, partly funded by private initiatives (fundraising, corporate deals or anything deemed "okay").
It's still very much in a trial mode and has come under fire for not "ensuring an equally good education" and for being a breeding ground for religious schools (here considered a spawning pool for fundies).
386 | gregb Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:35:38am |
re: #344 cenotaphium
Paid to watch porn? Sounds like an exhausting job.
Seriously though, I've never understood how someone can have the arrogance to porn surf on any job, let alone public offical's jobs. Just the casual surfing distractions ought to be enough waste of paid time, I think?
My colleague's first business success was a pr0n filtering company that went out at over a billion dollar IPO. It's big business. NSF could solve their issue in an instant: buy the software.
"The humanitarian defense"...sickenly hilarious.
387 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:35:48am |
re: #371 Pianobuff
When writing the English G-d, what do Jews natively have in mind? Elohim, Adonai, the tetragrammaton?
INteresting question. For me I suppose all of them and none of them in particular. Each of those names is actually an aspect of G-d - not a physical aspect, but an aspect none the less. So if you see the word, "tree" do you think of the trunk or the leaves or the roots?
388 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:36:04am |
re: #345 Occasional Reader
Did the Vorlons and Shadows ever "rumble"?
Usually by proxy; the wars are carried out by the younger races.
There is some help from the Vorlons and Shadows, and they might have had their wars in the past.
389 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:36:14am |
re: #373 Occasional Reader
Ah, so you're a classical conservative, I see, in the tradition of Edmund Burkha.
I Kant believe the puns have started this early.
390 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:36:23am |
391 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:36:47am |
392 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:37:04am |
re: #376 Spenser (with an S)
There is a huge swing in the quality of public schools here and the ones my kids would go to (based on our address) are bad. They have many good teachers but are mostly treading water. Our school has a very diverse grouping ethnically and economically which is nice. The parents are incredibly involved and we've had some very generous alumnus who enable us to have a great campus with excellent equipment.
Let's hear it for endowments!!!
393 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:37:12am |
re: #387 LudwigVanQuixote
INteresting question. For me I suppose all of them and none of them in particular. Each of those names is actually an aspect of G-d - not a physical aspect, but an aspect none the less. So if you see the word, "tree" do you think of the trunk or the leaves or the roots?
Or, to wax Maimonidean, do you define tree by way of equivocal negations?
394 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:37:49am |
re: #347 LudwigVanQuixote
And Aryeh Kaplan is something totally different from Schroeder on every level.
I love Kaplan.
I realize, but I wanted to bring up that book. When I bring up Kaplan at Chabad, they disagree, because the Rebbe said the universe was created 5770 years ago, but they do respect him.
396 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:38:10am |
re: #329 cenotaphium
The part about public schools makes sense. However, surely there are more secular private schools than religious private schools?.
Not where I live.
397 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:39:08am |
Most politicians send their children to private school. and if you dare mention the hypocrisy and ask/grovel for a solution that would let parents choose to opt out of a failing school district in favor of a private school (via a voucher program) - said democrats go ape shit.
398 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:39:41am |
re: #393 Guanxi88
Or, to wax Maimonidean, do you define tree by way of equivocal negations?
:) you know your stuff... :)
399 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:39:52am |
400 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:40:05am |
re: #392 MandyManners
Let's hear it for endowments!!!
Yep, a couple of Billionaires met and spent a good part of their childhood in our system and they are very thankful.
401 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:40:07am |
re: #390 Danny
I admit, I hesitated to hold myself up as an example of "normal".
Are you one fo those spawned fundies?
402 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:40:19am |
re: #388 Kosh's Shadow
Usually by proxy; the wars are carried out by the younger races.
There is some help from the Vorlons and Shadows, and they might have had their wars in the past.
And then everyone gets it on...
403 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:40:31am |
re: #398 LudwigVanQuixote
:) you know your stuff... :)
No, my teacher knew his stuff, because his teacher knew his his stuff, and so on.
404 | gregb Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:40:55am |
re: #350 FrogMarch
(just jumping in...)
The wacky religious types give all religion a bad stereotype.
My kids go to Catholic school because:
1) I had a very good experience with Catholicism growing up and chose to be Catholic, not just because of my upbringing and exposure
2) There a lot of petty politics in the very good public schools around here, and the PTA and other administrators have various agendas they are pushing at the expense of the kids
3) I want my kids to take religion class and understand it to counter all the misinformation and bigotry
4) It's a great school, less students, more personal attention, closer to home,
5) There's just certain behaviors and attitudes including pop culture that I would prefer not to expose them to, too early in their lives
405 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:41:01am |
406 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:41:05am |
407 | reine.de.tout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:41:10am |
re: #396 Danny
Not where I live.
You know, we don't have many secular private schools, either. I think it's partly because the Episcopal and Catholic school tradition goes back 50 years or more, so those have been in place for a very long time.
The secular schools as well as the fundamentalist Christian schools started popping up when the public school system began to fail. But there was plenty of room already in the existing private schools, so there weren't enough students to support many secular private schools.
408 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:41:26am |
Morning lizards. Apparently the base is still wild about Palin, they can relate to her, for whatever the means, good or bad.
409 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:41:38am |
re: #380 Occasional Reader
I've never really understood the concept of "obscene material", nor some sort of objective judgement on artistic merit (cue the Bill Hicks skit about these concepts). If it's not illegal in any way, whatever you choose to call "art" is art.
Then again, our legal systems are very different.
410 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:42:55am |
As for American men, they rounded out the Top 5 on the worst lovers list due to their "dominating" ways in the bedroom.
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
okay boys, put away those whips and cuffs
411 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:43:31am |
412 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:44:11am |
re: #402 LudwigVanQuixote
And then everyone gets it on...
I've always sorta half wondered about what alien intelligences would make of other species' pr0n, assuming we humans are not unique in this respect. Baffling, I think, would be among the first adjectives they'd have to use. "Sweet Mother of Meepzorp! There are millions of examples of this genre; the dialogue is poor, the plot is unintelligible or non-existent, and they keep attempting to reproduce, but we see no offspring. Are these the works of a sterile and dying species, driven to incoherence by the certain knowledge that they are the last generation? Oh, look at the size of that..."
413 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:44:23am |
re: #410 albusteve
As for American men, they rounded out the Top 5 on the worst lovers list due to their "dominating" ways in the bedroom.
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
okay boys, put away those whips and cuffs
Oh, I'm just gonna' step back.
414 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:45:12am |
415 | gregb Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:45:26am |
re: #376 Spenser (with an S)
There is a huge swing in the quality of public schools here and the ones my kids would go to (based on our address) are bad. They have many good teachers but are mostly treading water. Our school has a very diverse grouping ethnically and economically which is nice. The parents are incredibly involved and we've had some very generous alumnus who enable us to have a great campus with excellent equipment.
Orange County is a great melting pot of diversity, but it works as we're all tied together by the shared values of economic freedom and values.
It's something I wish the general GOP would learn. Our local brand of conservative-libertarianism should be a model for the whole party.
It's the economic opportunity, stupid.
416 | Colin Nelson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:47:04am |
re: #389 MandyManners
Don't want to Hegal about this but I feel a bad case of Spinoza coming on
417 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:47:20am |
re: #412 Guanxi88
I've always sorta half wondered about what alien intelligences would make of other species' pr0n, assuming we humans are not unique in this respect. Baffling, I think, would be among the first adjectives they'd have to use. "Sweet Mother of Meepzorp! There are millions of examples of this genre; the dialogue is poor, the plot is unintelligible or non-existent, and they keep attempting to reproduce, but we see no offspring. Are these the works of a sterile and dying species, driven to incoherence by the certain knowledge that they are the last generation? Oh, look at the size of that..."
Good question.
BTW, in one of the season 1 episodes of Babylon 5, Ambassador Mollari is seen cheating at cards with a tentacle. It turns out the tentacle is a Centauri sex organ. They aren't as human as they look.
418 | Creeping Eruption Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:47:23am |
re: #389 MandyManners
I Kant believe the puns have started this early.
Too early for that or a Buber thread
419 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:47:30am |
re: #410 albusteve
As for American men, they rounded out the Top 5 on the worst lovers list due to their "dominating" ways in the bedroom.
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
okay boys, put away those whips and cuffs
I hate it when researchers generalize like that. Just because my spurs tore up all those ladies' waterbeds, it doesn't mean what they think it does.
420 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:47:47am |
re: #401 MandyManners
Are you one fo those spawned fundies?
All I know is that I'm fundamentally going broke from tuition payments.
421 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:48:01am |
re: #410 albusteve
As for American men, they rounded out the Top 5 on the worst lovers list due to their "dominating" ways in the bedroom.
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
okay boys, put away those whips and cuffs
"When it came to the best lovers in the world, Spanish men topped the list followed by Brazilians and Italians."
Interesting. Here's a vote for the Irish men.
422 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:48:42am |
re: #410 albusteve
As for American men, they rounded out the Top 5 on the worst lovers list due to their "dominating" ways in the bedroom.
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
okay boys, put away those whips and cuffs
Not porn, and probably SFW, but a song about a book about s&m:
423 | saylorfam Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:49:00am |
re: #283 Walter L. Newton
Hi Walter,
Velikovsky was a speaker at an assembly when I was in school back in 1968. He had just published "Earth in Upheaval" and being only a kid of 15, it was all totally lost on me. This was The William Penn Charter School in Philadelphia.
Have a good morning!
424 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:49:13am |
re: #408 avanti
Morning lizards. Apparently the base is still wild about Palin, they can relate to her, for whatever the means, good or bad.
There's no real mystery. She is a compelling "story". Soccer mom, PTA member who wanted to do more for her community. Attractive, appears to have a solid marriage and family with many of the same foibles as "regular" people.
From your link
Some refused to talk about her at all. Others, mostly her critics, would do so only off the record. But taken as a whole, the body of interviews revealed that despite Palin’s high negative ratings in recent national polls, Republicans at the grass-roots level and their leaders still hold a very favorable impression of the former Alaska governor.
Westerners have a particular affinity for Palin, with many noting that she embodied the values of freedom and self-reliance.
Nobody is holding her up as Albert Schweitzer, just a feel good story
425 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:49:19am |
re: #416 Colin Nelson
Don't want to Hegal about this but I feel a bad case of Spinoza coming on
I Hegel with the merchants all the time, whenever I go Schopen'[hauer].
427 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:49:35am |
re: #416 Colin Nelson
Don't want to Hegal about this but I feel a bad case of Spinoza coming on
You have a Locke on the Best Punster title.
428 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:50:00am |
429 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:50:35am |
430 | lawhawk Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:50:54am |
re: #388 Kosh's Shadow
SG-1 had the ancients (Asgard) in a battle with the replicators and the Ori - directly. Earthlings ended up getting Asgard technologies and carried on the fight agains the replicators and the Ori, all while continuing to deal with the Go'auld.
B5 was interesting because the Vorlon and Shadows both used others to fight for them - pulling the strings as it were in a galactic battle that raged on and off for millennium.
431 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:50:55am |
re: #421 FrogMarch
When it came to the best lovers in the world, Spanish men topped the list
I'm surprised Spaniards can stop smoking for long enough to have sex...
432 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:51:01am |
re: #426 gregb
Galaxy Quest...
Is that in the film? Meepzorp I swiped from the Coneheads (The Moons of Meepzorp festival)
433 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:51:20am |
re: #387 LudwigVanQuixote
INteresting question. For me I suppose all of them and none of them in particular. Each of those names is actually an aspect of G-d - not a physical aspect, but an aspect none the less. So if you see the word, "tree" do you think of the trunk or the leaves or the roots?
OK. So maybe it's a collective term? The closest analogue in Christianity that comes to mind is the "the" descriptor after G-d for the three persons. G-d the father, G-d the son, G-d the Holy Spirit - although I suspect they mean quite different things - nevertheless "G-d" is an aggregator.
434 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:51:40am |
re: #420 Danny
All I know is that I'm fundamentally going broke from tuition payments.
That plus gas and it's well over $1,000.00/mo..
435 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:51:45am |
436 | Colin Nelson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:51:48am |
re: #425 Occasional Reader
Good one! - as said by Jean Renaud in the Steve Martin, Pink Panther film
437 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:52:08am |
re: #430 lawhawk
Earthlings ended up getting Asgard technologies and carried on the fight agains the replicators and the Ori, all while continuing to deal with the Go'auld.
Lucky for us, they all spoke fluent English.
439 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:53:13am |
re: #430 lawhawk
SG-1 had the ancients (Asgard) in a battle with the replicators and the Ori - directly. Earthlings ended up getting Asgard technologies and carried on the fight agains the replicators and the Ori, all while continuing to deal with the Go'auld.
B5 was interesting because the Vorlon and Shadows both used others to fight for them - pulling the strings as it were in a galactic battle that raged on and off for millennium.
Actually, the Asgard aren't the same as the Ancients; the Ancients have Ascended and don't interfere in the affairs of the rest of us, except a bit at the end when the Orisi (sp?) was using Ascended powers.
The Asgard looked like the "Greys".
440 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:54:08am |
re: #430 lawhawk
Lawhawk, I'll be hitting NYC one of these upcoming weekends, and was trying to get some of the area lizards together for a beer. I've blued my nic... drop me a line.
441 | Irish Rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:54:08am |
There seems to be some kind of persistant rumor going around that I've been banned at LGF... I've already been contact by three former lizards.
I have no idea where this is coming from.
442 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:54:27am |
All this about Stargate points out the one good thing to come from von Danniken's work - and that is, it inspired Stargate.
443 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:54:44am |
Says Lloyd Marcus (black, unhyphenated-American) FWIW;
The Left published a cartoon depicting former black Secretary of State Condolezza Rice as an Aunt Jemima; another depicted Rice as a huge-lipped parrot for her Massa Bush. Neither were considered racist by their creators or publishers, or even widely condemned on the Left.In opposition to black Republican Michael Steele's campaign torun for U.S. Senate, a liberal blogger published a doctored photo of Steele in black face and big red lips made to look like a minstrel. The caption read, "Simple Sambo wants to move to the big house". Not one Democrat denounced these racist portrayals of black conservatives.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but maybe give some perspective. The dems did not alienate, and in fact did just fine with black Americans this last election.
444 | FrogMarch Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:55:57am |
re: #431 Occasional Reader
I'm surprised Spaniards can stop smoking for long enough to have sex...
lol. Most of Europe for that matter.
Puff and thrust.
/sorry.
445 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:56:13am |
re: #443 Spenser (with an S)
Says Lloyd Marcus (black, unhyphenated-American) FWIW;
Two wrongs don't make a right, but maybe give some perspective. The dems did not alienate, and in fact did just fine with black Americans this last election.
Link?
446 | tokyobk Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:56:18am |
re: #253 LudwigVanQuixote
PIMF
I have studied at Yeshiva and I read the scriptures in the original. I have not yet found any large objection that seems to show a conflict, that can not be answered by a better application of scriptural knowledge or scientific knowledge.
Only if you start taking non-literal meanings. There is day and night before a sun and one day, yom, is a literal day of sundown to sundown. For starts.
447 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:56:25am |
re: #434 MandyManners
That plus gas and it's well over $1,000.00/mo..
You're getting out of it cheaply. We pay $160 a month just for bus fees (a bus stop that I have to take him 6 miles from my house to get too)
Tuition, lab fees, club dues (Gavel Club, Key Club, National Honor Society) plus a monthly lunch pass, I exceed $1800 per month
448 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:56:26am |
more sex...chew on this
[Link: www.foxnews.com...]
449 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:56:48am |
450 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:57:00am |
re: #167 theheat
/Probably at the decimal point./
I hope for her personal peace she has managed to forgive him, but there's a difference between forgiveness and pragmatism.
451 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:57:00am |
452 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:57:20am |
re: #441 Irish Rose
There seems to be some kind of persistant rumor going around that I've been banned at LGF... I've already been contact by three former lizards.
I have no idea where this is coming from.
You're always the last to know!!
//
453 | Danny Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:57:28am |
re: #441 Irish Rose
There seems to be some kind of persistant rumor going around that I've been banned at LGF... I've already been contact by three former lizards.
I have no idea where this is coming from.
Is there any truth to it?
/
454 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:57:39am |
re: #444 FrogMarch
lol. Most of Europe for that matter.
Puff and thrust.
/sorry.
Why so many Euro ladies got burns on their backs - the ashtray keeps sliding.
455 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:57:43am |
re: #442 Kosh's Shadow
All this about Stargate points out the one good thing to come from von Danniken's work - and that is, it inspired Stargate.
It's been a long time since I've watched Stargate... it was great for a good long while, then the inevitable shark-jump. But in it's prime, it was almost the perfect "adventure" television series, right down to the theme music.
456 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:58:35am |
457 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 7:59:33am |
re: #445 MandyManners
Right here. I had not heard of him before and can't vouch for everything he says, but this seemed rational.
458 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:00:01am |
re: #455 Occasional Reader
It's been a long time since I've watched Stargate... it was great for a good long while, then the inevitable shark-jump. But in it's prime, it was almost the perfect "adventure" television series, right down to the theme music.
I missed most of the early seasons, but caught part of 8-10, and I thought it was pretty good.
Stargate Atlantis had its good points, too.
459 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:00:02am |
re: #431 Occasional Reader
I'm surprised Spaniards can stop smoking for long enough to have sex...
Do you smoke after sex?
I don't know, I never checked.
460 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:00:05am |
re: #447 sattv4u2
You're getting out of it cheaply. We pay $160 a month just for bus fees (a bus stop that I have to take him 6 miles from my house to get too)
Tuition, lab fees, club dues (Gavel Club, Key Club, National Honor Society) plus a monthly lunch pass, I exceed $1800 per month
I don't wanna' know about high school!
There's a bus service but quite a few parents who live seventy or so miles away just buy a house in the city and live there five days a week.
461 | subsailor68 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:00:22am |
Morning all! Thought I'd post this:
In Bad Times for Capitalism, Socialists in Europe Suffer
Why? Because it's the New York Times, and from the tone of the article, they appear to be deeply saddened by this.
Bwahahahahaha!
I, on the other hand, am perfectly happy at the news.
462 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:00:56am |
re: #457 Spenser (with an S)
Right here. I had not heard of him before and can't vouch for everything he says, but this seemed rational.
Herman Cain has stated much the same
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
463 | Colin Nelson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:01:09am |
re: #449 Spare O'Lake
I sense some Rousseau I better leave...
464 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:01:15am |
465 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:01:54am |
re: #457 Spenser (with an S)
From your link above:
Why is the Left so angry at Blacks who love America?
... the sixty-four thousand dollar question.
/Wow, not so much money these days /
466 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:02:04am |
re: #459 Spare O'Lake
Do you smoke after sex?
I don't know, I never checked.
I'm reminded of the old Addams Family TV show.
Morticia Addams would ask "Mind if I smoke"
and then smoke would start coming out from under her long (floor-length) dress. I hadn't caught the sexual reference back when I was a kid.
"I love it when you speak French..."
467 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:02:05am |
re: #410 albusteve
As for American men, they rounded out the Top 5 on the worst lovers list due to their "dominating" ways in the bedroom.
I'm surprised by this, as I remember reading a joke book which listed sexual positions by nationality. The US was "both on top", rather negating the idea of the dominating male.
468 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:02:08am |
re: #457 Spenser (with an S)
Right here. I had not heard of him before and can't vouch for everything he says, but this seemed rational.
I tried to up-ding you but the little circle is going round and round.
Consider yourself up-dinged.
469 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:02:19am |
re: #460 MandyManners
I don't wanna' know about high school!
There's a bus service but quite a few parents who live seventy or so miles away just buy a house in the city and live there five days a week.
That is High School. Their grammer school os only a couple of hundred less per month
471 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:02:57am |
re: #459 Spare O'Lake
Do you smoke after sex?
I don't know, I never checked.
Do you like Dickens?
I don't know, I've never been to one.
(Think about it while repeating the words over and over again).
472 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:03:13am |
re: #460 MandyManners
When my oldest graduated from high school and went to college, we got a huge tuition break.
Sad fact of life in the big city here.
473 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:03:27am |
re: #468 MandyManners
I tried to up-ding you but the little circle is going round and round.
Consider yourself up-dinged.
I refreshed.
474 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:03:29am |
re: #458 Kosh's Shadow
You've *got* to go back and watch the earlier series just for O'Neill. Best comedy bits ever. Also MacGyver.
475 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:04:01am |
476 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:04:37am |
re: #469 sattv4u2
That is High School. Their grammer school os only a couple of hundred less per month
That's what I meant. Mr. Cranky's still in elementary.
477 | Killgore Trout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:04:54am |
Hmmm...Drudge is using the gang beating video to discredit Chicago's Olympic bid as Malkin used yesterday. I'm sensing some cooperation.
478 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:05:14am |
re: #466 Kosh's Shadow
Kosh, remind me... are you in New York as well?
479 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:05:17am |
re: #447 sattv4u2
Dang! Ok, I needed that. Ours is $5k/yr. and the bus comes 3 blocks away. Plus our church has a max % of income you must pay. I can write the check with a steady hand now.
480 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:05:29am |
re: #412 Guanxi88
I've always sorta half wondered about what alien intelligences would make of other species' pr0n, assuming we humans are not unique in this respect. Baffling, I think, would be among the first adjectives they'd have to use. "Sweet Mother of Meepzorp! There are millions of examples of this genre; the dialogue is poor, the plot is unintelligible or non-existent, and they keep attempting to reproduce, but we see no offspring. Are these the works of a sterile and dying species, driven to incoherence by the certain knowledge that they are the last generation? Oh, look at the size of that..."
Well I think that rules of manners for the year 3009 will have some things in it like this...
When meeting an alien species you are not familiar with and attempting to shake hands, only shake what is offered, do not shake just any appendage.
As to how they would see us, I figure it would be a similar experience to us watching snails get it on. Though I shudder to think of some alien PhD. student writing it's thesis on our "goofy face."
481 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:06:16am |
re: #472 tradewind
When my oldest graduated from high school and went to college, we got a huge tuition break.
Sad fact of life in the big city here.
I sometimes think I'm nuts for planning to send him to Belle Meade in Nashville starting in the ninth grade.
482 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:06:39am |
483 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:06:59am |
re: #474 cenotaphium
You've *got* to go back and watch the earlier series just for O'Neill. Best comedy bits ever. Also MacGyver.
I'm told, mostly by Latin Americans (for some reason), that I look like "MacGyver". But without the mullet.
Another thing I liked about the Stargate series is that they were quite firearms-savvy, at least by television standards (which is a pretty low bar, admittedly).
484 | Dreader1962 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:07:08am |
re: #475 Occasional Reader
Do you like Kipling?
I don't know, I've never kippled.
You beat me to this, but here is the link to the postcard:
485 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:07:17am |
re: #446 tokyobk
Only if you start taking non-literal meanings. There is day and night before a sun and one day, yom, is a literal day of sundown to sundown. For starts.
Believe it or not, you would not be the first to point out that a literal day is defined by the sun and that since the sun is not created first, they can not be literally days.
There are several cabbalistic calculations that place the age of the universe from 12 to 15 billion years.
486 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:07:19am |
re: #474 cenotaphium
You've *got* to go back and watch the earlier series just for O'Neill. Best comedy bits ever. Also MacGyver.
I started to, on Hulu, and I have to get back to it.
I did like the ones I've seen.
487 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:07:20am |
re: #477 Killgore Trout
Doesn't matter... from tabloids and other news sources, that's already a scene many foreigners believe depicts life in big city USA on any given day.
488 | Oh no...Sand People! Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:08:13am |
re: #477 Killgore Trout
Hmmm...Drudge is using the gang beating video to discredit Chicago's Olympic bid as Malkin used yesterday. I'm sensing some cooperation.
Vast Right Wing conspiracy.
489 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:08:15am |
re: #461 subsailor68
No mention of Sweden in the article? I feel left out. Well, adding to the article all by myself I can tell you the race between the left and right blocs in this country is neck-and-neck at the moment.
The general opinion is that the socialists have squandered their role as opposition by a lackluster leadership. Mind you, despite that, it's still neck-and-neck.
490 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:08:33am |
re: #478 Occasional Reader
Kosh, remind me... are you in New York as well?
No; I live about 40 miles west of Boston and work in Burlington, about 20 miles or so northwest.
491 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:08:58am |
re: #458 Kosh's Shadow
I missed most of the early seasons, but caught part of 8-10, and I thought it was pretty good.
Stargate Atlantis had its good points, too.
Best series to see on Hulu I think is Defying Gravity. It was alas, much much too smart to last.
492 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:09:09am |
re: #477 Killgore Trout
Hmmm...Drudge is using the gang beating video to discredit Chicago's Olympic bid as Malkin used yesterday. I'm sensing some cooperation.
I stated it yesterday when I linked to it that it is terrible timing for both Chicago and the President.
((I didn't know I was in cahoots with Matt and Malkin!))
//
493 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:09:18am |
re: #490 Kosh's Shadow
No; I live about 40 miles west of Boston and work in Burlington, about 20 miles or so northwest.
Ah. Well, then, you can't come to our treehouse club. Nyaaah!
494 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:09:37am |
re: #480 LudwigVanQuixote
Well I think that rules of manners for the year 3009 will have some things in it like this...
When meeting an alien species you are not familiar with and attempting to shake hands, only shake what is offered, do not shake just any appendage.
From Red Dwarf, where a human is trying to ingratiate himself with the leader of a group of Gelfs.
Lister: Cigar? (Takes out a cigar and places it in the gelf's mouth) Cool Dude!
Kryten (the robot): (Quietly in Lister's ear) Err, might I suggest caution sir, some gelfs have their sphinctral orifices in their faces.
495 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:09:52am |
re: #461 subsailor68
Morning all! Thought I'd post this:
In Bad Times for Capitalism, Socialists in Europe Suffer
Why? Because it's the New York Times, and from the tone of the article, they appear to be deeply saddened by this.
Bwahahahahaha!
I, on the other hand, am perfectly happy at the news.
lol... well someone does have to work...
496 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:10:07am |
re: #483 Occasional Reader
I'm told, mostly by Latin Americans (for some reason), that I look like "MacGyver". But without the mullet.
Another thing I liked about the Stargate series is that they were quite firearms-savvy, at least by television standards (which is a pretty low bar, admittedly).
Well, in Stargate: The Ark of Truth (I think it was) they're shooting automatic weapons at the replicators INSIDE THE SHIP, and go through a shitload of ammo, without damaging anything except the replicators they hit. Some intelligent bullets, I guess.
497 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:12:02am |
re: #491 LudwigVanQuixote
Best series to see on Hulu I think is Defying Gravity. It was alas, much much too smart to last.
I'll look for it. I had been trying to catch up on Dollhouse before the season 2 premiere, and did so, and I finished a science fiction story I was working on and sent it to Dianna for criticism, so I might have some time to watch something.
498 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:12:11am |
re: #479 Spenser (with an S)
Dang! Ok, I needed that. Ours is $5k/yr. and the bus comes 3 blocks away. Plus our church has a max % of income you must pay. I can write the check with a steady hand now.
My sons school is not affiliated with any church, so the tuition isn't subsidized in any way
499 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:12:14am |
re: #496 Kosh's Shadow
Well, in Stargate: The Ark of Truth (I think it was) they're shooting automatic weapons at the replicators INSIDE THE SHIP, and go through a shitload of ammo, without damaging anything except the replicators they hit. Some intelligent bullets, I guess.
They're very good shots?
Like I said... by television standards...
In fact, Stargate SG-1 was the first place I saw the utterly cool P90 "personal defense weapon", which at first I thought was just something they made up for the show. Imagine my surprise when I walked by the White House one day, and saw a Secret Service agent holding one. "OMG! Stargate is REAL!"
500 | Irish Rose Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:12:27am |
Time to get ready for class.
Later, lizards.
501 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:12:27am |
House without House at the hospital is simply not house. I hope this season picks up fast because so far it is sorely lacking.
Now Dexter on the other hand - John Lithgow is a genius and he plays a damned fine bad guy. Ricochet... bitchin'.
502 | subsailor68 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:13:05am |
re: #489 cenotaphium
No mention of Sweden in the article? I feel left out. Well, adding to the article all by myself I can tell you the race between the left and right blocs in this country is neck-and-neck at the moment.
The general opinion is that the socialists have squandered their role as opposition by a lackluster leadership. Mind you, despite that, it's still neck-and-neck.
Hi cenotaphium! No, no mention of Sweden. But, yes, it does note that the blocs are still very close - when all is said and done. It also points out that conservatives in Europe are a little more left than those here in the U.S.
503 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:13:33am |
504 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:13:45am |
re: #493 Occasional Reader
Ah. Well, then, you can't come to our treehouse club. Nyaaah!
I'd make a remark about trees in NY, but I've been through Central Park (and survived), so I know there are trees.
We're in NYC about once a year; my wife has something to do there.
505 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:14:01am |
506 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:14:28am |
re: #499 Occasional Reader
They're very good shots?
Like I said... by television standards...
In fact, Stargate SG-1 was the first place I saw the utterly cool P90 "personal defense weapon", which at first I thought was just something they made up for the show. Imagine my surprise when I walked by the White House one day, and saw a Secret Service agent holding one. "OMG! Stargate is REAL!"
Well, notice they put Cheyenne Mountain on standby just as the series ended?
///
507 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:14:32am |
re: #477 Killgore Trout
Hmmm...Drudge is using the gang beating video to discredit Chicago's Olympic bid as Malkin used yesterday. I'm sensing some cooperation.
You have to wonder what is so wrong about being chosen to host the games that would make some on the right work to hurt the effort. I guess they think having Obama "fail" is always good news, no matter the issue.
508 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:14:38am |
re: #480 LudwigVanQuixote
Why the reach for alien civilizations to expound on weird sexuality? Our own Earth provides plenty to be fascinated about. Like the weird scorpion dance, where the male stings the female to make her co-operate and then lays out a spermatophore on which to guide her.
Or take the beetle and its spiked phallus that tears up the females reproductive tract.
509 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:14:41am |
re: #498 sattv4u2
My sons school is not affiliated with any church, so the tuition isn't subsidized in any way
It's interesting. Our school is not parochial, but private and parent and board-run. Our church, however, places such a high value on a Christian education that they have that policy for any parent at any Christian school they want to send their kids to. It's nice.
510 | Dreader1962 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:14:48am |
re: #501 equable
House without House at the hospital is simply not house. I hope this season picks up fast because so far it is sorely lacking.
Now Dexter on the other hand - John Lithgow is a genius and he plays a damned fine bad guy. Ricochet... bitchin'.
Lithgow is very versatile - he can play both comedy and drama equally well, and that is very rare in today's actors.
511 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:14:48am |
I heard an interview with Richard Dawkins this morning on CBC's The Current. He had a couple of really cool similes:
1. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the Holocaust never happened.
2. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the distance between NYC and LA is only 28 feet.
512 | subsailor68 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:15:17am |
re: #501 equable
House without House at the hospital is simply not house. I hope this season picks up fast because so far it is sorely lacking.
Now Dexter on the other hand - John Lithgow is a genius and he plays a damned fine bad guy. Ricochet... bitchin'.
Hi equable! Not to worry, House will be back at the hospital. Must say the wife and I really did enjoy the season premiere - and it's really great to see Andre Braugher back on the screen (looks like he may be a recurring character).
513 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:15:27am |
re: #481 MandyManners
Here to the west of ya'll, there wasn't really a choice. In the largest city in the state, there is exactly one public high school that can provide a quality education.
My sister in TX paid literally three times what her house would have been worth any where else just to be able to live in a good public school system... they ran the numbers and figured they'd save over the long haul. Not an option here.
514 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:15:37am |
re: #510 Dreader1962
Lithgow is very versatile - he can play both comedy and drama equally well, and that is very rare in today's actors.
Lithgow - "Laugh-a while you can, monkey boy!"
515 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:15:58am |
re: #510 Dreader1962
Lithgow is very versatile - he can play both comedy and drama equally well, and that is very rare in today's actors.
Indeed, I've been a fan of his for many years. His children's books are great too.
516 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:16:01am |
re: #501 equable
Ricochet... bitchin'.
"A Beretta in the butt beats a blade in the boot."
Words to live by.
517 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:16:16am |
re: #511 Spare O'Lake
I heard an interview with Richard Dawkins this morning on CBC's The Current. He had a couple of really cool similes:
1. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the Holocaust never happened.
2. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the distance between NYC and LA is only 28 feet.
Equating YEC with Holocaust deniers?
Fuck that.
518 | gregb Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:16:19am |
re: #432 Guanxi88
Is that in the film? Meepzorp I swiped from the Coneheads (The Moons of Meepzorp festival)
No, one of the characters has cross-species s-e-x with the alien. But I think I remember they were trying to figure out how first.
519 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:16:46am |
re: #507 avanti
You have to wonder what is so wrong about being chosen to host the games that would make some on the right work to hurt the effort. I guess they think having Obama "fail" is always good news, no matter the issue.
Many people in Chicago regardless of "wing" have been against the city getting the games.
520 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:16:56am |
re: #485 LudwigVanQuixote
Believe it or not, you would not be the first to point out that a literal day is defined by the sun and that since the sun is not created first, they can not be literally days.
There are several cabbalistic calculations that place the age of the universe from 12 to 15 billion years.
How do you know God does not have a watch timed to his work day ? /
521 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:16:57am |
re: #501 equable
You don't have long to wait.
Re Dexter... dammit, I am not going to be able to watch Lithgow, just tooo creepy.
523 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:18:25am |
re: #511 Spare O'Lake
Those are good quotes. For some other Dawkins quotes that I found "interesting", see my #256 and #262 above.
524 | Killgore Trout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:18:48am |
Hot Air published another article from racist RS McCain in their Green Room again.
525 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:19:08am |
re: #508 cenotaphium
Why the reach for alien civilizations to expound on weird sexuality?
I read recently that in marsupials, the male generally has a bifurcated penis to go with the female's two vaginas...not many people know that (spoken in the voice of Michael Caine)
526 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:19:09am |
re: #512 subsailor68
Heya Sailor, good to see you.
You're right, Andre Braugher is an incredible actor. The season premiere was good and it was interesting to see house exercise a bit of introspection; that is, as much as he is capable of. Then again maybe it was an act?
Time and future episodes will tell.
527 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:19:16am |
re: #517 MandyManners
Equating YEC with Holocaust deniers?
Fuck that.
I agree. The two things may involve similar sorts of evidence-denial, but Holocaust denial is principally motivated by hatred; YEC'ism is not. It's a lousy analogy.
528 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:19:33am |
re: #494 John Neverbend
From Red Dwarf, where a human is trying to ingratiate himself with the leader of a group of Gelfs.
Lister: Cigar? (Takes out a cigar and places it in the gelf's mouth) Cool Dude!
Kryten (the robot): (Quietly in Lister's ear) Err, might I suggest caution sir, some gelfs have their sphinctral orifices in their faces.
I loved Red Dwarf!
OK more manners for 3009...
It is considered very rude to suddenly awaken someone by turning the gravity back on.
Pizza delivery must still be tipped by A.U. regardless of being over half an hour late.
Always be cordial to the A.I. that runs your ship.
If hostile aliens tell you that they want to eat your face, believe them.
"Accidently" teleporting into the women's locker room and claiming it was all a mistake will not cut it.
Never say "What's the harm in a little grit from this little forgotten planetoid..." Always wash properly.
If you must engage in cross species romance, make certain that you each know which gender you are first.
529 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:19:35am |
re: #519 sattv4u2
Many people in Chicago regardless of "wing" have been against the city getting the games.
Lot's of folks disagree with the government, but both Bush and Obama support the choice as does the city government.
530 | Honorary Yooper Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:19:56am |
re: #441 Irish Rose
There seems to be some kind of persistant rumor going around that I've been banned at LGF... I've already been contact by three former lizards.
I have no idea where this is coming from.
I've no idea as well. I'd suspect either some folks who hate you here, or more likely the Deucers started it. Anyway, there's a good quote about such things,
"The report of my death was an exaggeration."
-Mark Twain
"I wasn't really dead."
-Paul McCartney
531 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:20:28am |
re: #521 tradewind
I'll tell you what, the first episode of this season wigged me out. Lithgow can be one creepy sumbish when he wants to be.
532 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:20:35am |
re: #502 subsailor68
Hi cenotaphium! No, no mention of Sweden. But, yes, it does note that the blocs are still very close - when all is said and done. It also points out that conservatives in Europe are a little more left than those here in the U.S.
Indeed they are. However, mostly on a country-by-country basis. Sweden is probably an outlier. Our right-most party (excluding the budding racist fringe) is much left of your Democratic Party. The general feeling is that the scale (be it ours or others) is very warped - and it's a pain in the backside when you're online and everyone still uses the same terminology yet it means something completely different.
Then again, you seem to have the same problem, what with "liberal" needing the modifier "classical" to mean what we take it to mean over here.
I'm curious though, why the rejoicing of the falling (or failing) left in Europe?
533 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:20:59am |
re: #520 avanti
How do you know God does not have a watch timed to his work day ? /
That is actually the point. G-d's "day" is not ours.
534 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:21:29am |
re: #530 Honorary Yooper
I've no idea as well. I'd suspect either some folks who hate you here, or more likely the Deucers started it. Anyway, there's a good quote about such things,
"The report of my death was an exaggeration."
-Mark Twain"I wasn't really dead."
-Paul McCartney
Next to Mandy, you must be near the top of the stalkers recruitment drive.
535 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:22:09am |
re: #511 Spare O'Lake
The best one I've heard is that making a distinction between micro- and macroevolution is like believing in inches but not feet.
536 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:22:11am |
re: #529 avanti
Lot's of folks disagree with the government, but both Bush and Obama support the choice as does the city government.
excellent cover for some payback...gotta admit
537 | Killgore Trout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:22:15am |
re: #524 Killgore Trout
hmmm...also an article lecturing African Americans by Michael van der Galien who I seem to recall is a Vlaams Belang supporter.
538 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:22:41am |
re: #529 avanti
Lot's of folks disagree with the government, but both Bush and Obama support the choice as does the city government.
And again, lots of "folks" from all sides of the political spectrum would prefer Chicago does NOT get the games. This isn't recent. One group has been lobbying against it since 2007
Your original post stated that it's the "right wing" thats against it
You're correct in that SOME on the "right wing" are, but you cotradicted yourself by stating that Bush is for it!
539 | tokyobk Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:22:59am |
re: #485 LudwigVanQuixote
Of course, I am aware that there are all kind of interpretations, some old, but it still seems the simplest and likely truest explanation is that the people who wrote the bible had a very limited understanding of the world they lived in.
Is the word "yom" used anywhere else in the Torah in an figurative way? It seems to mean a day, as the firmament, shamayim, is meant to be a literal dome with a flat earth underneath it.
Science does not negate God but makes a personal god who intervenes in history, listens to prayers very, very hard to find or believe in, imo. Because such an entity would be confirmable outside of belief.
540 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:23:20am |
re: #517 MandyManners
Equating YEC with Holocaust deniers?
Fuck that.
The interviewer asked him why he chose such a controversial comparison. His response was that Holocaust denial shows approximately the same contempt for the indisputable evidence as does a literal belief in YEC.
541 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:23:32am |
re: #511 Spare O'Lake
Holocaust denial is the new "you're wrong" du jour and diminishes the moral implications of the holocaust. Sorry to say but that simile is about as cool as Roman Polanski working at your local day care.
542 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:24:01am |
re: #538 sattv4u2
And again, lots of "folks" from all sides of the political spectrum would prefer Chicago does NOT get the games. This isn't recent. One group has been lobbying against it since 2007
And Chicago is a heavily blue city in a blue state.
543 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:24:44am |
544 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:24:57am |
re: #511 Spare O'Lake
I heard an interview with Richard Dawkins this morning on CBC's The Current. He had a couple of really cool similes:
1. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the Holocaust never happened.
2. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the distance between NYC and LA is only 28 feet.
Dawkins appears to be conflating two distinct ideas, both of which appear in "The Greatest Show on Earth", but in different places. In that book, he compares the plight of science teachers who are trying to teach evolution with a hypothetical situation where a history teacher is required to "teach the controversy" about the holocaust, i.e. the alternative theory that it never happened. Later on, he mentions the distance analogy. I did not get the impression at all that he is saying that creationists are equal to holocaust deniers.
545 | Honorary Yooper Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:25:56am |
re: #511 Spare O'Lake
I heard an interview with Richard Dawkins this morning on CBC's The Current. He had a couple of really cool similes:
1. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the Holocaust never happened.
2. Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old is like believing that the distance between NYC and LA is only 28 feet.
I can see the second analogy, but Dawkins is off base with the first. To compare anything other than the denial of genocide to Holocaust denial is to cheapen the Holocaust and the evil that caused it to happen.
546 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:26:03am |
547 | subsailor68 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:26:06am |
re: #532 cenotaphium
Indeed they are. However, mostly on a country-by-country basis. Sweden is probably an outlier. Our right-most party (excluding the budding racist fringe) is much left of your Democratic Party. The general feeling is that the scale (be it ours or others) is very warped - and it's a pain in the backside when you're online and everyone still uses the same terminology yet it means something completely different.
Then again, you seem to have the same problem, what with "liberal" needing the modifier "classical" to mean what we take it to mean over here.
I'm curious though, why the rejoicing of the falling (or failing) left in Europe?
Thanks so much for your insight in an area I'm not that familiar with!! BTW, Sweden is number one on our list of places we'd love to visit...with Greece coming in at number two.
I'm not actually rejoicing, but I've never been comfortable with large government, and the left (almost everywhere) is far too committed to increased government intrusion for my taste. (But hey, that's just me!)
;-)
548 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:26:50am |
re: #541 equable
and diminishes the moral implications of the holocaust.
Not Dawkins' first time...
I (reporter) asked an obvious question: “As we speak of this shifting zeitgeist, how are we to determine who’s right? If we do not acknowledge some sort of external [standard], what is to prevent us from saying that the Muslim [extremists] aren’t right?”“Yes, absolutely fascinating.” His response was immediate. “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question. But whatever [defines morality], it’s not the Bible. If it was, we’d be stoning people for breaking the Sabbath.”
549 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:27:04am |
re: #533 LudwigVanQuixote
That is actually the point. G-d's "day" is not ours.
Philosophical question, if man is created in Gods image, why would he need all the human bits ? I've always imagined a supreme being without any physical form, since why would he need one.
550 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:27:09am |
re: #539 tokyobk
Of course, I am aware that there are all kind of interpretations, some old, but it still seems the simplest and likely truest explanation is that the people who wrote the bible had a very limited understanding of the world they lived in.
Is the word "yom" used anywhere else in the Torah in an figurative way? It seems to mean a day, as the firmament, shamayim, is meant to be a literal dome with a flat earth underneath it.
Science does not negate God but makes a personal god who intervenes in history, listens to prayers very, very hard to find or believe in, imo. Because such an entity would be confirmable outside of belief.
Actually, G-d is supposed to work in a way where He cannot be detected.
For the science, quantum mechanics allows this; there is a fundamental "randomness" that can be directed by G-d.
And Tzvi Freeman has a book "Heaven Exposed" (warning though; he is a Creationist, saying the world was created in 6 days, but created so it was already billions of years old).
Anyway, in the book, one of the stories involves an angel getting psychotherapy to deal with having to do miracles that don't look like miracles.
551 | Honorary Yooper Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:27:15am |
re: #534 avanti
Next to Mandy, you must be near the top of the stalkers recruitment drive.
Nah. They hate my ass. In some stalkers' circles, I'm as bad as Killgore.
552 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:27:23am |
re: #531 equable
I liked the show even though I had a lot of eye-closing moments (just can't watch the butchery), but I am afraid there is going to be so much of Lithgow as monster that I'll have to pass or never be able to watch him again. It won't hurt me to have one less slot on the tivo.
I think House is going to be great this season. I got a little weary in the middle of the last one.
553 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:27:54am |
re: #540 Spare O'Lake
The interviewer asked him why he chose such a controversial comparison. His response was that Holocaust denial shows approximately the same contempt for the indisputable evidence as does a literal belief in YEC.
Well, he's full of shit about that. As OR noted in No. 527, denying the Holocaust is all about hatred.
554 | lawhawk Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:28:25am |
re: #542 Spenser (with an S)
It's the same with the NYC 2012 effort. There were quite a few people opposed to getting the 2012 games particularly because of the traffic nightmares that would occur and the need for new venues and that the money could be better spent elsewhere.
555 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:28:29am |
re: #532 cenotaphium
you seem to have the same problem, what with "liberal" needing the modifier "classical"
That does bug me.
556 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:28:54am |
re: #549 avanti
Philosophical question, if man is created in Gods image, why would he need all the human bits ? I've always imagined a supreme being without any physical form, since why would he need one.
Are you really asking, or snarking? It's hard to tell in a post.
557 | bosforus Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:29:02am |
re: #530 Honorary Yooper
I've no idea as well. I'd suspect either some folks who hate you here, or more likely the Deucers started it. Anyway, there's a good quote about such things,
"The report of my death was an exaggeration."
-Mark Twain"I wasn't really dead."
-Paul McCartney
You forgot one.
"I feel happpyyy!"
-Monty Python
558 | subsailor68 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:29:12am |
On the subject of the television season, one of our guilty pleasures is Fringe. The actor who plays Walter (the crazy scientist/dad) is terrific.
559 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:29:14am |
re: #548 Spenser (with an S)
That is seriously fucked up.
560 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:29:24am |
re: #483 Occasional Reader
Re: the firearms savvy, I remember reading on some weapon-centric blog that they had some good military advisors on the StarGate set. That is, squad tactics, movement under fire, use of suppressing fire and so on were very good (again, for a TV show).
I agreed with said article.
561 | Honorary Yooper Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:29:43am |
re: #542 Spenser (with an S)
And Chicago is a heavily blue city in a blue state.
Chicago is what makes Illinois "blue". Go out to the collar counties and downstate with the exceptions of Peoria and Champaign, and the state is mostly "red" until you hit US-50. Then it flips to real-old-school Democrat.
562 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:29:57am |
And rules for surviving if you in a horror movie.
1. Never ever go off alone into the woods, where the creepy serial killer killed 12 people last summer, to have sex.
2. If you have gone camping in the creepy woods where 12 people were murdered last summer, and you start finding your friends dismembered, do not go looking for the Jock and his GF who went into the woods to have sex. Leave a note.
3. If the walls in your house begin to bleed and a voice from Hell yells at you to "Get OUT!" Get the hell out of there.
4. Do not spend overlong theorizing if it was a retro-virus, or radiation or voodoo, that caused the zombie infestation. Shoot them in the head and don't get bitten.
5. In case of zombie apocalypse, the first place to go is the hardware store. Army/Navy store is good too.
6. When in doubt, keep running, do not turn to look. Look instead where you are running.
7. If the critter is down, do not assume it is dead and collapse to weep or pray. Decapitate it and get the hell away.
8. When the creepy old mystical person tells you that if you go there you will all die and then mysteriously vanishes, change your travel plans.
563 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:30:16am |
re: #553 MandyManners
Well, he's full of shit about that. As OR noted in No. 527, denying the Holocaust is all about hatred.
Give the girl a kewpie doll.
I agree: anybody who throws Hitler and the holocaust around like that, even to prove a very valid point just goes to show that the person doing so doesn't have much emotional/moral attachment to what that son of a bitch did and is low enough to use what he did as an "example".
Very low and hateful indeed.
564 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:30:57am |
re: #539 tokyobk
Of course, I am aware that there are all kind of interpretations, some old, but it still seems the simplest and likely truest explanation is that the people who wrote the bible had a very limited understanding of the world they lived in.
Is the word "yom" used anywhere else in the Torah in an figurative way? It seems to mean a day, as the firmament, shamayim, is meant to be a literal dome with a flat earth underneath it.
Science does not negate God but makes a personal god who intervenes in history, listens to prayers very, very hard to find or believe in, imo. Because such an entity would be confirmable outside of belief.
How would you confirm it if everyone experienced the interaction differently?
565 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:31:08am |
re: #562 LudwigVanQuixote
And, if you're a woman, LOSE THE FREAKIN' HIGH HEELS.
566 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:31:20am |
re: #538 sattv4u2
And again, lots of "folks" from all sides of the political spectrum would prefer Chicago does NOT get the games. This isn't recent. One group has been lobbying against it since 2007
Your original post stated that it's the "right wing" thats against it
You're correct in that SOME on the "right wing" are, but you cotradicted yourself by stating that Bush is for it!
Not really,as I said, "some" on the right oppose it, Bush is not one of those "some".
567 | subsailor68 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:31:49am |
re: #562 LudwigVanQuixote
Morning Ludwig! LOL! Good idea on the hardware store and Army/Navy. But, if you're a fan of "Shaun of the Dead", you just head for the pub!
568 | badger1970 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:31:49am |
re: #477 Killgore Trout
It's not hard since the murder rate in Chicago is pretty high for an American city. It's just added fuel to the fire. But bo would have never gone to Denmark if Chicago '16 wasn't a sure thing.
569 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:32:12am |
570 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:32:14am |
re: #552 tradewind
Sorry to hear about how you feel about Lithgow =( and yes, his first murder in the premiere of Dexter was very very very ... bad. It was one of the worst murders I've ever seen portrayed in a television show, and Lithgow performing the deed just made it that much... terrible.
571 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:32:25am |
re: #554 lawhawk
It's the same with the NYC 2012 effort. There were quite a few people opposed to getting the 2012 games particularly because of the traffic nightmares that would occur and the need for new venues and that the money could be better spent elsewhere.
yup, pretty simple...and few people benefit from the corrupt administration of the games...for the ordinary citizen it's just not worth the hassle, especially the summer games
572 | Killgore Trout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:32:38am |
re: #568 badger1970
I used to live there. This stuff is fairly common. It's a tough city.
573 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:32:58am |
re: #563 equable
Give the girl a kewpie doll.
I agree: anybody who throws Hitler and the holocaust around like that, even to prove a very valid point just goes to show that the person doing so doesn't have much emotional/moral attachment to what that son of a bitch did and is low enough to use what he did as an "example".
Very low and hateful indeed.
At the very least, Dawkins shows poor judgment.
574 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:33:45am |
re: #549 avanti
Philosophical question, if man is created in Gods image, why would he need all the human bits ? I've always imagined a supreme being without any physical form, since why would he need one.
If you find that interesting you should look into the omphalos discussion. Literally, the discussion on whether or not Adam (and Eve) were created with a navel (signifying birth).
YEC rethoric uses this question, since it deals with a creation that's given the appearance of age.
Personally, I find the idea of a god creating a compelling hoax existence too akin to a trickster god. One of the great things about polytheism was that you could always put the conflicting aspects of existence into separate shapes (see also the Theodicé problem).
575 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:34:12am |
re: #562 LudwigVanQuixote
Rules for survival in a war movie:
1) Never pass around a photo of your sweetheart, while you smile beatifically and tell your buddies how you're gonna get married as soon as this damn war is over. At that point, your life expectancy can be measured in minutes.
2) Never, EVER, say, "Indians/Japanese/Germans/[fill in enemy here]? Why there isn't a [fill in enemy here] within a hundred miles of here!" You're guaranteed to be cut down within seconds.
3) ALWAYS try to be the wisecracking guy from Brooklyn in the platoon. If anyone lives, it'll be you.
576 | albusteve Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:34:21am |
re: #572 Killgore Trout
I used to live there. This stuff is fairly common. It's a tough city.
the trick to really enjoying the great city of Chicago is to not live there
577 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:34:39am |
re: #570 equable
It's kind of like William Hurt's role in Damages (although not on the horror/creep factor level)... he'll always seem different to me now.
578 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:34:48am |
re: #545 Honorary Yooper
I can see the second analogy, but Dawkins is off base with the first. To compare anything other than the denial of genocide to Holocaust denial is to cheapen the Holocaust and the evil that caused it to happen.
I am as sensitive to Holocaust denial as anyone I know, but I respectfully disagree with you. Holocaust denial is, quite apart from being evil, a denial of proven facts.
If Dawkins' analogy cheapens anything, it is YEC in particular, and extreme religious beliefs in general.
579 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:34:52am |
re: #573 MandyManners
At the very least, Dawkins shows poor judgment.
Righto. What's a shame is even if he is making a valid point, there's going to be two schools:
1. Those who think he is very insightful and provided a "why didn't I think of that" moment for the extremist types.
2. People with a heart who want to hurl a fossilized mammoth turd at him.
580 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:35:07am |
re: #566 avanti
Not really,as I said, "some" on the right oppose it, Bush is not one of those "some".
You have to wonder what is so wrong about being chosen to host the games that would make some on the right work to hurt the effort
And alll that I pointed out to you is that "some" on the left are working to the same end
581 | badger1970 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:35:16am |
re: #575 Occasional Reader
"They couldn't hit an Elephant at this distance!" *POW*
582 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:35:18am |
re: #577 tradewind
I'll have to check that out, thanks for the tip. Ever see the movie "Ricochet"?
583 | Killgore Trout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:35:27am |
re: #576 albusteve
I'm glad I lived there for a while. It was a really fun time but it's not a city I would want to raise children or grow old in.
584 | Honorary Yooper Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:35:28am |
re: #569 Spenser (with an S)
Except Aurora, no?
No, because DuPage and Kane Counties tend to vote Republican instead of Democrat. Especially DuPage.
586 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:36:29am |
re: #570 equable
Now, do you mean worst in the "badly performed" sense, or the "most horrible" sense?
587 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:36:40am |
re: #579 equable
Righto. What's a shame is even if he is making a valid point, there's going to be two schools:
1. Those who think he is very insightful and provided a "why didn't I think of that" moment for the extremist types.
2. People with a heart who want to hurl a fossilized mammoth turd at him.
How big is a mammoth turd?
588 | equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:37:08am |
re: #585 tradewind
It's a good action flick, albeit a little on the cheesy side. He plays a real bastard in that movie.
589 | tradewind Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:37:55am |
If I lived in Chicago, and they do get the games, I'd start looking into a good house swap service and plan either a great vacation in an exotic spot, or else list it with a rental agency and at least cash in on the chaos. The best seats in the house will be on tv anyway...
591 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:38:15am |
593 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:39:03am |
re: #556 Spenser (with an S)
Are you really asking, or snarking? It's hard to tell in a post.
Asking, even though I'm agnostic, I enjoy exploring the possibility of a greater power, and to speculate on it's form. I think mere humans are just speculating on the existence of a God, or Gods, and if he/they exist, what form would make sense rationally.
594 | Honorary Yooper Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:39:47am |
re: #587 MandyManners
How big is a mammoth turd?
Big enough, I'd guess. Must be bigger than a modern elephant's.
Whatever, the imagery of a "mammoth turd" is a bit amusing.
595 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:40:27am |
re: #567 subsailor68
Morning Ludwig! LOL! Good idea on the hardware store and Army/Navy. But, if you're a fan of "Shaun of the Dead", you just head for the pub!
Morning Sub! Actually... I know there is a book about surviving zombie apocalypse, but it has been a personal joke of mine for years. I look at any particular item or bit of knowledge and I ask,, will this help me in case of zombie apocalypse.
I do love Shaun of the dead.
So Some zombie survival tips...
1. A flame thrower may seem like a great weapon, but they do not drop instantly. Now they are shambling towards you while on fire...
2. Having a pump 12 loaded with slugs means never having to say you are sorry. Use that at range and a sword, which does not jam or run out of ammo at close range. Also, do not try to decapitate the zombie with either weapon. It is very hard for them to shamble after you with only one leg.
3. Once a leg is off, then you burn em!
4. There is no such thing as checking the perimeter too much.
5. Make certain to inspect people for bites... sorry ladies :)
6. While you are grabbing cans of food, gasoline and more ammunition, be certain to take toilet paper.
596 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:40:50am |
597 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:41:12am |
Man, Iran is refusing to talk about their nukeyoolar program with the members of the "Security Council" (the U.N. brute squad) and it's said that Saudi is going to allow Israel to use their air space in case she wants to knock the crap out of Iran.
Methinks that Saudi is hoping that Iran gets the crap kicked out of them, gets annexed so that they can seriously control the oil market once and for all.
Bastards.
598 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:41:34am |
re: #580 sattv4u2
You have to wonder what is so wrong about being chosen to host the games that would make some on the right work to hurt the effort
And alll that I pointed out to you is that "some" on the left are working to the same end
I get that, but I have not seen leftie sites taking up the cause to kill the choice, more on the local state level.
600 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:41:55am |
601 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:42:07am |
602 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:42:45am |
re: #597 Equable
Man, Iran is refusing to talk about their nukeyoolar program with the members of the "Security Council" (the U.N. brute squad) and it's said that Saudi is going to allow Israel to use their air space in case she wants to knock the crap out of Iran.
Methinks that Saudi is hoping that Iran gets the crap kicked out of them, gets annexed so that they can seriously control the oil market once and for all.
Bastards.
The Saudis have as much to fear from Iran as Israel. Do not forget the whole Sunni/Shia split.
603 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:42:54am |
re: #262 Spenser (with an S)
Of course he already lost any credibility with me when he said this in an interview;
I (reporter) asked an obvious question: “As we speak of this shifting zeitgeist, how are we to determine who’s right? If we do not acknowledge some sort of external [standard], what is to prevent us from saying that the Muslim [extremists] aren’t right?”
“Yes, absolutely fascinating.” His response was immediate. “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question. But whatever [defines morality], it’s not the Bible. If it was, we’d be stoning people for breaking the Sabbath.”
Please. Give me a break.
Richard Dawkins was saying that our reasons for understanding that Hitler was not right are not derived from the Bible. He was NOT saying that Hitler was a wonderful person. This is nothing but quote-mining.
This is the full context of the discussion:
“I’m actually rather interested in the shifting zeitgeist. If you travel anywhere in the Western world, you find a consensus of opinion which is recognizably different from what it was only a matter of a decade or two ago. You and I are both a part of that same zeitgeist, and [as to where] we get our moral outlook, one can almost use phrases like ‘it’s in the air.’”
At this point, perhaps a word of explanation is necessary. Zeitgeist is a German word meaning “spirit of the age.” Dawkins here refers to the prevailing moral climate or mood of a given place or time. We may observe that what constitutes moral or ethical behavior differs from one culture to another; indeed, it may even differ within a given culture. This is not in dispute. The question, rather, is this: should moral standards be based on the societal zeitgeist or should they look beyond it to something else?
I asked an obvious question: “As we speak of this shifting zeitgeist, how are we to determine who’s right? If we do not acknowledge some sort of external [standard], what is to prevent us from saying that the Muslim [extremists] aren’t right?”
“Yes, absolutely fascinating.” His response was immediate. “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question. But whatever [defines morality], it’s not the Bible. If it was, we’d be stoning people for breaking the Sabbath.”
604 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:43:32am |
re: #597 Equable
Man, Iran is refusing to talk about their nukeyoolar program with the members of the "Security Council" (the U.N. brute squad) and it's said that Saudi is going to allow Israel to use their air space in case she wants to knock the crap out of Iran.
Methinks that Saudi is hoping that Iran gets the crap kicked out of them, gets annexed so that they can seriously control the oil market once and for all.
Bastards.
I'd rather the Saudis control the oil supply than the Iranians.
As much as the Saudi ruling family pays off extremist imams, they want money for their planes, yachts, hookers, booze, etc. and that means keeping oil flowing.
The Iranians could just tell the world to screw Israel or they don't get oil.
605 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:43:54am |
re: #593 avanti
OK, then. As I have been taught, "In God's Image" means after His character. We fail miserably every day, but as an ideal, we were made to be creative, loving, just, and compassionate. Sometimes, we see glimpses of that in good people and, as a believer in common grace, I think we can see it in a symphony or a kind act even if that person does not currently believe in God.
606 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:44:08am |
There's a hell of a lot of effort being expended to demonize Richard Dawkins here. Why is that? And it's based on misleading, out of context quotes.
607 | wrenchwench Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:44:08am |
re: #537 Killgore Trout
hmmm...also an article lecturing African Americans by Michael van der Galien who I seem to recall is a Vlaams Belang supporter.
No, he was anti-VB. Here's his most recent appearance at LGF. I'm sorry to see he has a post at HotAir. I haven't read it yet, though.
608 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:44:33am |
re: #602 LudwigVanQuixote
That's exactly what I was thinking. Saudi has a wonderful habit of opening their valuable air space so that the West can go kick the holy hell out of anybody that threatens their oil interests and theocracy.
As much as I love my Nova and Mustang I am tinkering with lately, oil be damned.
609 | Killgore Trout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:45:18am |
re: #607 wrenchwench
No, he was anti-VB. Here's his most recent appearance at LGF. I'm sorry to see he has a post at HotAir. I haven't read it yet, though.
Ah, thanks for the correction. I should have researched that before I speculated.
610 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:46:01am |
re: #544 John Neverbend
Dawkins appears to be conflating two distinct ideas, both of which appear in "The Greatest Show on Earth", but in different places. In that book, he compares the plight of science teachers who are trying to teach evolution with a hypothetical situation where a history teacher is required to "teach the controversy" about the holocaust, i.e. the alternative theory that it never happened. Later on, he mentions the distance analogy. I did not get the impression at all that he is saying that creationists are equal to holocaust deniers.
He isn't. This is nothing but an attempt at demonizing Dawkins.
611 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:46:46am |
re: #606 Charles
I fully understood what Dawkins was trying to say and I wasn't demonizing him at all. I said in an earlier thread that his poor use of analogies was simply hyperbolic and it is going to take away from what he was trying to say. People will mine for quotes to either discredit someone or try to lend credence to what a person is trying to say.
Demonizing what the guy said, not the guy in general.
612 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:48:02am |
re: #611 Equable
I fully understood what Dawkins was trying to say and I wasn't demonizing him at all. I said in an earlier thread that his poor use of analogies was simply hyperbolic and it is going to take away from what he was trying to say. People will mine for quotes to either discredit someone or try to lend credence to what a person is trying to say.
Demonizing what the guy said, not the guy in general.
This is not a poor analogy at all. His point was simple, unless you're determined to try to use it against him.
613 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:48:12am |
re: #603 Charles
I get that, I think it was still a troubling and unnecessary thing to say. He is unquestionably intelligent, but he can still not "get" certain things.
614 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:49:32am |
re: #612 Charles
Nope, I just believe that the holocaust is sacred and should be left alone.
I agree with the analogy and what Dawkins is saying; to blatantly ignore fact A is tantamount to ignoring fact B and is fairly lame-brained.
615 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:49:53am |
re: #598 avanti
I get that, but I have not seen leftie sites taking up the cause to kill the choice, more on the local state level.
All you have to do is look a little. here's one of the leading opponents
[Link: www.meetup.com...]
as self described progressive who started the NOTCHICAGO
[Link: www.notchicago.com...]
616 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:50:26am |
re: #606 Charles
There's a hell of a lot of effort being expended to demonize Richard Dawkins here. Why is that? And it's based on misleading, out of context quotes.
For crying out loud, I heard an interview in the car and repeated the gist of a couple of clever lines that happened to stick. I wasn't quoting him verbatim or from his book.
Sheesh.
617 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:50:46am |
re: #612 Charles
And not all creationists (such as myself) are stupid and so delusional that we're going to put our fingers in our ears going "neener neener I can't hear you".
618 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:50:53am |
re: #548 Spenser (with an S)
You've posted that quote THREE times in this thread. How about admitting to the fact that it was taken out of context and doesn't say anything like what you're distorting it to mean?
619 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:51:08am |
re: #612 Charles
This is not a poor analogy at all.
I disagree, for the reasons stated upthread. Holocaust denial, IMO, has very little to do with someone's actual approach to evidence; it's all about hatred. I, for one, doubt that Ahmadeinejad (for instance) TRULY believes the Holocaust didn't happen.
620 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:51:26am |
Demonize Dawkins? Not I. I just don't like that particular comparison.
621 | wrenchwench Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:51:31am |
re: #609 Killgore Trout
Ah, thanks for the correction. I should have researched that before I speculated.
Looks like he started at HotAir's Green Room the month following his last appearance here.
Who’s that Dutchman Anyway?
posted at 8:24 am on May 15, 2009 by Michael van der Galien
printer-friendlyIt took me a while to be allowed to write for the GreenRoom, but here I finally am: Michael van der Galien, a 24-year old American Studies and Languages and Cultures of the Middle East student from the Netherlands, blogger and occasional columnist. I run my own website PoliGazette, blog at Dagelijkse Standaard (a new conservative blog in Dutch), (try to) write a weekly round-up of Western European news for Real Clear World, and write columns for newspapers (formerly Turkish Daily News, now Hürriyet English and others) and (other) news websites.
If I recall correctly, he is a Muslim. No reason to include that in one's bio, of course.
622 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:51:48am |
re: #549 avanti
Philosophical question, if man is created in Gods image, why would he need all the human bits ? I've always imagined a supreme being without any physical form, since why would he need one.
Judaism teaches that G-d has no body. He is completely non physical. So our body is not what is made in His image.
There are several things that we are in His image according to Judaism:
1. We name things. There is a very long discussion about speaking and the ability to name and to create, but the short form is that we can form ideas and create new objects and communicate. No act of creation begins without conceptualizing it first and naming something is conceptualizing it.
2. We speak. Again there is a long discussion on the nature of speech from a spiritual level.
3. We love.
4. We have free will. This one gets spoken about the most in this context.
Each of these topics is a ten page essay. There are literally whole books about this in the Tradition. However, the point is that being made in G-d's image is a function of mind and soul and interaction.
One other note. It is seen as one of the greatest gifts of G-d, by the Tradition that He told us we were created in His image.
Not only should it inspire you with hope for what you can achieve, but if you believe it, then the reason not to harm others becomes clear. Both you and he are created in the same image and are equally loved and equally capable of changing the world for the better. To harm him is to defile G-d and ultimately yourself.
623 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:52:27am |
re: #603 Charles
I read his comments is that no one "book" can define morality. As a matter of history, many religious texts have been used to justify the most immoral acts.
624 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:52:28am |
re: #621 wrenchwench
If I recall correctly, he is a Muslim. No reason to include that in one's bio, of course.
Yes, he's a Muslim convert -- a Sufi, I believe. Interesting that he leaves it out of his little bio at Hot Air.
625 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:53:09am |
626 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:53:13am |
lol you're down-dinging me even though I am agreeing with you in principle?
627 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:53:24am |
re: #619 Occasional Reader
I disagree, for the reasons stated upthread. Holocaust denial, IMO, has very little to do with someone's actual approach to evidence; it's all about hatred. I, for one, doubt that Ahmadeinejad (for instance) TRULY believes the Holocaust didn't happen.
I seriously suggest that you try reading what Dawkins actually wrote on this topic instead of relying on someone's paraphrase of what they heard on the radio.
628 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:53:43am |
re: #626 Equable
lol you're down-dinging me even though I am agreeing with you in principle?
Yes, because your points are ridiculous and untrue.
629 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:53:46am |
And by the way, I do agree that the "how can we say Hitler was wrong?" quote is not problematic, and should not be taken out of context.
631 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:54:52am |
re: #622 LudwigVanQuixote
Judaism teaches that G-d has no body. He is completely non physical. So our body is not what is made in His image.
There are several things that we are in His image according to Judaism:
1. We name things. There is a very long discussion about speaking and the ability to name and to create, but the short form is that we can form ideas and create new objects and communicate. No act of creation begins without conceptualizing it first and naming something is conceptualizing it.
2. We speak. Again there is a long discussion on the nature of speech from a spiritual level.
3. We love.
4. We have free will. This one gets spoken about the most in this context.
Each of these topics is a ten page essay. There are literally whole books about this in the Tradition. However, the point is that being made in G-d's image is a function of mind and soul and interaction.
One other note. It is seen as one of the greatest gifts of G-d, by the Tradition that He told us we were created in His image.
Not only should it inspire you with hope for what you can achieve, but if you believe it, then the reason not to harm others becomes clear. Both you and he are created in the same image and are equally loved and equally capable of changing the world for the better. To harm him is to defile G-d and ultimately yourself.
I hadn't thought of those ideas. They make perfect sense.
632 | Spenser (with an S) Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:55:22am |
re: #618 Charles
Minimizing the shock-value of those words "holocaust" and "Hitler" was my only point. My first quote by him was about his desire that people of faith be converted from their religions to skepticism. That bothered me more.
633 | Occasional Reader Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:55:23am |
re: #627 Charles
I seriously suggest that you try reading what Dawkins actually wrote on this topic instead of relying on someone's paraphrase of what they heard on the radio.
Okay.
634 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:55:53am |
re: #606 Charles
There's a hell of a lot of effort being expended to demonize Richard Dawkins here. Why is that? And it's based on misleading, out of context quotes.
I think that there are multiple conversations on this. Not everyone is taking him to task. I think the my 253 kinda sums it up.
635 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:55:59am |
re: #628 Charles
Maybe to you.
So you advocate that anybody in the scientific community has the right to throw the holocaust around to prove their point?
That's ridiculous and my points aren't untrue to everybody. If you look around I had a good deal of people who agreed with me. I don't really care about being down-dinged to be honest, but I'd prefer a civil debate as opposed to being called "ridiculous".
636 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:57:13am |
re: #622 LudwigVanQuixote
However, the point is that being made in G-d's image is a function of mind and soul and interaction.
Exactly. In the strands of my tradition, the "image" thing is understood to refer specifically to the soul and mind. Physicality is something else, altogether.
One other note. It is seen as one of the greatest gifts of G-d, by the Tradition that He told us we were created in His image.
This is one of the big points of medieval Jewish philosophy - this ability to know that which no man can know by reason or observation, and this by a free gift of the Author of Being.
Not only should it inspire you with hope for what you can achieve, but if you believe it, then the reason not to harm others becomes clear. Both you and he are created in the same image and are equally loved and equally capable of changing the world for the better. To harm him is to defile G-d and ultimately yourself.
When you despise a man, know in Whose image he was made, and know Whose image you despise.
637 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:57:32am |
re: #622 LudwigVanQuixote
Judaism teaches that G-d has no body. He is completely non physical. So our body is not what is made in His image.
There are several things that we are in His image according to Judaism:
1. We name things. There is a very long discussion about speaking and the ability to name and to create, but the short form is that we can form ideas and create new objects and communicate. No act of creation begins without conceptualizing it first and naming something is conceptualizing it.
2. We speak. Again there is a long discussion on the nature of speech from a spiritual level.
3. We love.
4. We have free will. This one gets spoken about the most in this context.
Each of these topics is a ten page essay. There are literally whole books about this in the Tradition. However, the point is that being made in G-d's image is a function of mind and soul and interaction.
One other note. It is seen as one of the greatest gifts of G-d, by the Tradition that He told us we were created in His image.
Not only should it inspire you with hope for what you can achieve, but if you believe it, then the reason not to harm others becomes clear. Both you and he are created in the same image and are equally loved and equally capable of changing the world for the better. To harm him is to defile G-d and ultimately yourself.
Have you ever thought about the organization that calls itself "B'Tselem" ("in the image") always defends people whose behavior is more in the image of Satan than in the image of G-d, but they never defend, say, Gilad Shalit, demanding for him the same rights as they demand for others? (Using "Satan" here as a synonym for evil, not to suggest in any way that Judaism promotes Dualism)
638 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:57:43am |
re: #630 wrenchwench
Between you and Alouettte, I have a serious case of the warm and fuzzies this morning. Makes me wanna' have another baby.
640 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:59:34am |
re: #605 Spenser (with an S)
OK, then. As I have been taught, "In God's Image" means after His character. We fail miserably every day, but as an ideal, we were made to be creative, loving, just, and compassionate. Sometimes, we see glimpses of that in good people and, as a believer in common grace, I think we can see it in a symphony or a kind act even if that person does not currently believe in God.
OK, got that, so it's not so much following his physical image.
642 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 8:59:46am |
re: #637 Alouette
Have you ever thought about the organization that calls itself "B'Tselem" ("in the image") always defends people whose behavior is more in the image of Satan than in the image of G-d, but they never defend, say, Gilad Shalit, demanding for him the same rights as they demand for others? (Using "Satan" here as a synonym for evil, not to suggest in any way that Judaism promotes Dualism)
Chillul Hashem hurts. What can I say?
648 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:01:38am |
649 | vxbush Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:01:42am |
re: #646 Equable
Apnea?
No. Asthma, chronic. We're trying a new inhaler, and I don't think it's working so well.
650 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:02:02am |
re: #646 Equable
Why does the word apnea make me think of a dirty joke?
653 | Guanxi88 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:02:24am |
re: #640 avanti
OK, got that, so it's not so much following his physical image.
Yeah, nothing physical at all. Torah and the Prophets all teach the incorporeality of G-d as one of the fundamental premises of the faith.
655 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:02:37am |
re: #645 vxbush
Not me. Bad night sleep, problems breathing. Gah.
Same here. I wonder if it's contagious.
656 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:02:37am |
re: #650 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Do you have something you want to share with the class sir?
657 | vxbush Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:02:53am |
re: #652 Equable
Man, sorry to hear that. Hang in there =(
Well, if this keeps up, it's back to the doc to say, "Thanks, but try again."
658 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:03:16am |
re: #620 MandyManners
Demonize Dawkins? Not I. I just don't like that particular comparison.
Between being forced to teach creationism as science, and being forced to teach that the holocaust never happened as history? I don't see the problem; it's an excellent analogy. Both are odious intrusions of ideology on fact. Both are sickening. No expert in either field would ever agree with such an edict, and most would openly fight against one.
In what way are the two situations not alike? Apart from content, they are identical, and the comparison has the added benefit of immediacy - no imagination is required to see a point that is familiar to all, and attempts to teach both are currently underway in the present. Any other comparison would need to reach for come hypothetical construct with little relevance, like comparing the teaching of creationism as science (which is actually being attempted in the here and now) with something remote and fictional, like attempting to teach alchemy as chemistry.
It's an excellent analogy. I may have occasion to use it myself, and I won't hesitate should the opportunity arise.
659 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:03:20am |
re: #650 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Why does the word apnea make me think of a dirty joke?
What word doesn't?
660 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:03:26am |
661 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:04:33am |
re: #635 Equable
Maybe to you.
So you advocate that anybody in the scientific community has the right to throw the holocaust around to prove their point?
That's ridiculous and my points aren't untrue to everybody. If you look around I had a good deal of people who agreed with me. I don't really care about being down-dinged to be honest, but I'd prefer a civil debate as opposed to being called "ridiculous".
Your characterization of Dawkins' point is just foolish. He was NOT "throwing the Holocaust around."
In fact, in his new book, he shows an enormous amount of respect for the suffering caused by the Holocaust. This is what's pissing me off. It's not just out of context -- it's attempting to make him out to be something he is NOT, and demonize him for trivializing the Holocaust, when he does no such thing.
Here's what Dawkins actually wrote in the introduction to his new book:
[Link: entertainment.timesonline.co.uk...]
Imagine you are a teacher of more recent history, and your lessons on 20th-century Europe are boycotted, heckled or otherwise disrupted by well-organised, well-financed and politically muscular groups of Holocaust-deniers. Unlike my hypothetical Rome-deniers, Holocaustdeniers really exist. They are vocal, superficially plausible and adept at seeming learned. They are supported by the president of at least one currently powerful state, and they include at least one bishop of the Roman Catholic Church. Imagine that, as a teacher of European history, you are continually faced with belligerent demands to “teach the controversy”, and to give “equal time” to the “alternative theory” that the Holocaust never happened but was invented by a bunch of Zionist fabricators.
Fashionably relativist intellectuals chime in to insist that there is no absolute truth: whether the Holocaust happened is a matter of personal belief; all points of view are equally valid and should be equally “respected”.
The plight of many science teachers today is not less dire. When they attempt to expound the central and guiding principle of biology; when they honestly place the living world in its historical context — which means evolution; when they explore and explain the very nature of life itself, they are harried and stymied, hassled and bullied, even threatened with loss of their jobs. At the very least their time is wasted at every turn. They are likely to receive menacing letters from parents and have to endure the sarcastic smirks and close-folded arms of brainwashed children. They are supplied with state-approved textbooks that have had the word “evolution” systematically expunged, or bowdlerized into “change over time”. Once, we were tempted to laugh this kind of thing off as a peculiarly American phenomenon. Teachers in Britain and Europe now face the same problems, partly because of American influence, but more significantly because of the growing Islamic presence in the classroom — abetted by the official commitment to “multiculturalism” and the terror of being thought racist.
662 | vxbush Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:04:49am |
re: #660 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Want Jet to always love me...
Sorry. Reference is lost in a haze of asthma. Translation?
663 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:05:28am |
Old man picks up an old woman in a singles bar. They go back to her place, as she's undressing she tells him, "I need to warn you. I have acute angina".
He replied, "Thank goodness. You have the ugliest tits I've ever seen."
665 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:06:22am |
re: #619 Occasional Reader
I disagree, for the reasons stated upthread. Holocaust denial, IMO, has very little to do with someone's actual approach to evidence; it's all about hatred. I, for one, doubt that Ahmadeinejad (for instance) TRULY believes the Holocaust didn't happen.
But that isn't the point. The passage isn't about holocaust denial; it's about teaching holocaust denial as history. Which is odious to historians. Just as teaching creationism as science is odious to scientists. It's the educational mandate that's under discussion and it's lack of worth, not the subjects of the comparisons themselves.
666 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:06:40am |
667 | vxbush Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:07:43am |
re: #666 Fat Bastard Vegetarian
Ah mater... want jet to always love me.
-Paul McCartney and Wings.
Jet.Zotts All.
[lightbulb]
Ah! Gotcha.
668 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:07:55am |
re: #658 SixDegrees
Well if he was trying to invoke thought and attach a bit of urgency to what he was trying to say he certainly achieved that.
Teaching science is like an art form and sometimes you have to be a bit harsh to make a point stick; I understand this fully. The bum deal about this is art is open to interpretation and sometimes the heart speaks louder than the mind. I am privy to this at times and it is a character flaw I try to work on.
I reread the article and am rereading it again and see what he was saying as clear as day. I am trying to quell my initial feelings about the analogy he used.
669 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:08:00am |
re: #658 SixDegrees
Between being forced to teach creationism as science, and being forced to teach that the holocaust never happened as history? I don't see the problem; it's an excellent analogy. Both are odious intrusions of ideology on fact. Both are sickening. No expert in either field would ever agree with such an edict, and most would openly fight against one.
In what way are the two situations not alike? Apart from content, they are identical, and the comparison has the added benefit of immediacy - no imagination is required to see a point that is familiar to all, and attempts to teach both are currently underway in the present. Any other comparison would need to reach for come hypothetical construct with little relevance, like comparing the teaching of creationism as science (which is actually being attempted in the here and now) with something remote and fictional, like attempting to teach alchemy as chemistry.
It's an excellent analogy. I may have occasion to use it myself, and I won't hesitate should the opportunity arise.
Who said anything about forcing someone to teach the story of creation?!
670 | Killgore Trout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:09:23am |
Proof of fascism: Goosestepping!
671 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:09:41am |
re: #668 Equable
Well if he was trying to invoke thought and attach a bit of urgency to what he was trying to say he certainly achieved that.
Teaching science is like an art form and sometimes you have to be a bit harsh to make a point stick; I understand this fully. The bum deal about this is art is open to interpretation and sometimes the heart speaks louder than the mind. I am privy to this at times and it is a character flaw I try to work on.
I reread the article and am rereading it again and see what he was saying as clear as day. I am trying to quell my initial feelings about the analogy he used.
What he's saying is perfectly clear: attempts to teach creationism in science classes is as odious as attempts to teach holocaust revisionism in history classes.
It's just that simple and just that clear.
672 | Vicious Babushka Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:10:05am |
673 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:10:17am |
re: #669 MandyManners
Who said anything about forcing someone to teach the story of creation?!
Dawkins.
674 | wrenchwench Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:11:14am |
re: #670 Killgore Trout
Proof of fascism: Goosestepping!
Do you need a good grip on your putter to do that?
675 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:11:26am |
676 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:11:28am |
re: #658 SixDegrees
It's an excellent analogy. I may have occasion to use it myself, and I won't hesitate should the opportunity arise.
If there were an equally persuasive analogy which did not carry the same emotional content, I would have preferred Dawkins to use it. The problem is that I can't think of a better analogy which highlights the palpable falsity of both views.
677 | Honorary Yooper Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:11:35am |
678 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:12:16am |
re: #632 Spenser (with an S)
Minimizing the shock-value of those words "holocaust" and "Hitler" was my only point. My first quote by him was about his desire that people of faith be converted from their religions to skepticism. That bothered me more.
In forming a decent analogy, often it's the most extreme examples that work best. i.e., who has not heard the Hitler made the trains run on time analogy.
When comparing deniers, what more silly example can you use than those that deny the holocaust.
679 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:12:20am |
680 | wrenchwench Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:12:27am |
re: #638 MandyManners
Between you and Alouettte, I have a serious case of the warm and fuzzies this morning. Makes me wanna' have another baby.
Babies are good. If cute pictures is all it takes, I'll post more of 'em.
:)
681 | cenotaphium Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:12:46am |
682 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:12:59am |
re: #661 Charles
Glad you posted that as I was actually just reading that and I appreciate what you're saying.
Like I said in my previous post - sometimes the heart speaks louder (and unfortunately) sometimes louder than the mind.
This isn't foolish, it's human.
Some people are hyper-sensitive to the holocaust, me being one of them as my grandfather helped liberate Dachau and I had family members who died in the holocaust. That's where I was coming from.
You're right, it doesn't give me the right to judge anybody for using that analogy unless I am a holocause survivor.
The holocaust doesn't belong to me - it belongs to the world and people who are reasonable have the right to speak of it.
683 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:13:18am |
re: #676 John Neverbend
If there were an equally persuasive analogy which did not carry the same emotional content, I would have preferred Dawkins to use it. The problem is that I can't think of a better analogy which highlights the palpable falsity of both views.
Precisely. And frankly, I don't have a problem with this analogy even if there is an equivalent one; it succeeds brilliantly at conveying both the intellectual and emotional horror attached to such attempts.
684 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:13:26am |
Oh, I see where this stuff is coming from. BabbaZee is in full on outraged-creationist anti-Dawkins freak-out mode, posting pictures of him surrounded by swastikas.
Good grief.
686 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:14:39am |
re: #679 MandyManners
I was basing my reply on the initial quote.
Fair enough. I came in after the full quote had been posted.
687 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:15:01am |
re: #680 wrenchwench
Babies are good. If cute pictures is all it takes, I'll post more of 'em.
:)
My cat looks at the ginks we have running around here as surplus protein.
688 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:15:37am |
re: #678 avanti
In forming a decent analogy, often it's the most extreme examples that work best. i.e., who has not heard the Hitler made the trains run on time analogy.
When comparing deniers, what more silly example can you use than those that deny the holocaust.
{sigh}
Mussolini. It was Mussolini who purported to "make the trains run on time' As a second gem Italian that was always proffered as "proof" that he wasn't all bad!
[Link: www.google.com...]
689 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:15:46am |
re: #684 Charles
Oh, I see where this stuff is coming from. BabbaZee is in full on outraged-creationist anti-Dawkins freak-out mode, posting pictures of him surrounded by swastikas.
Good grief.
Oh, good gravy. Why?
690 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:16:04am |
re: #684 Charles
Oh, I see where this stuff is coming from. BabbaZee is in full on outraged-creationist anti-Dawkins freak-out mode, posting pictures of him surrounded by swastikas.
Good grief.
Who?
This is going to be another one of those sites I don't want to sully my computer with, isn't it?
691 | wrenchwench Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:16:05am |
re: #684 Charles
Oh, I see where this stuff is coming from. BabbaZee is in full on outraged-creationist anti-Dawkins freak-out mode, posting pictures of him surrounded by swastikas.
Good grief.
Something makes me think of Baskin Robbins 31 Flavors [of teh krazee]. This one could be Rocky Road.
692 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:16:47am |
re: #687 MandyManners
My cat looks at the ginks we have running around here as surplus protein.
Not ginks. Skinks.
694 | Douchecanoe and Ryan Too Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:17:40am |
re: #684 Charles
Oh, I see where this stuff is coming from. BabbaZee is in full on outraged-creationist anti-Dawkins freak-out mode, posting pictures of him surrounded by swastikas.
Good grief.
I didn't even know The Stupid (tm) was with her, but sometime during my long absence, she must've gotten herself banhammered. Meltdown mode seems to be the norm for people you kick out of here; maybe you should send them a notice recommending psychiatric evaluation when Stinky applies deadly force?
695 | wrenchwench Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:17:57am |
re: #690 SixDegrees
Who?
This is going to be another one of those sites I don't want to sully my computer with, isn't it?
She was so reasonable when it came to European far-right whackos. Then she went whacko herself over Creationism. She's one of the several former lizards that seem to have formed her own religion.
696 | sattv4u2 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:18:25am |
697 | Bear Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:19:24am |
How nice to turn on 'puter and see the picture. What a contrast to all the bad news.
698 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:19:38am |
re: #688 sattv4u2
{sigh}
Mussolini. It was Mussolini who purported to "make the trains run on time' As a second gem Italian that was always proffered as "proof" that he wasn't all bad![Link: www.google.com...]
Somewhat OT, but he also pushed to get two ocean liners out on time, and they both had mechanical problems due to the rush.
The Rex had trouble with her turbogenerators, but the Conte de Savoia had a potentially fatal problem.
A valve, normally made from harder material was made from cast iron instead, so it could be made quickly, failed.
The valve, used to control the flow of sea water for cooling, was under the waterline, and the ship had to be tilted to bring the hole to where it could be plugged. If they couldn't plug the hole, the generators would fail first, and then the ship would be taking on water; slowly, but without power they'd have trouble pumping it out.
Think of this when rushing a project.
699 | Fat Bastard Vegetarian Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:20:09am |
re: #670 Killgore Trout
Is he a better golfer than bowler?
700 | avanti Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:20:55am |
re: #688 sattv4u2
{sigh}
Mussolini. It was Mussolini who purported to "make the trains run on time' As a second gem Italian that was always proffered as "proof" that he wasn't all bad![Link: www.google.com...]
Thanks for the correction.
702 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:23:49am |
re: #670 Killgore Trout
Proof of fascism: Goosestepping!
But wait, they claim Obama is a liberal - oh wait, they claim fascist are liberals tooo...
703 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:23:56am |
re: #690 SixDegrees
Who?
This is going to be another one of those sites I don't want to sully my computer with, isn't it?
Yes, I'm afraid it is one of those sites. It says that we're all "shilling" for Dawkins. Am I "shilling" for Richard Wagner if I recommend that somebody listen to Die Meistersinger? I don't think so.
704 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:25:49am |
re: #684 Charles
I like your site Charles and appreciate what you have been trying to do over the years. I learned a lot here and saw a lot of things that help me to rethink many of my stances. That's why I am loyal to LGF, as it offers everything from all sides.
This is not a kiss ass "don't ban me bro!" moment, I'm being sincere. I consider a lot of people here (including you) friends even though I never met any of you. Anybody who teaches me something becomes special to me.
Anyway we're all learning as we go along here, and I am on your side as well as LGF's side.
705 | JEA62 Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:26:36am |
Just heard an interview with Ahmadina-looney ON NPR - he certainly DOES believe the murder of 6 million Jews never occurred.
As for deniers in general, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that they deny, not because of whatever nonsense historical reason they give, but because they really hate the Jews.
706 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:27:47am |
Public derangement at its very worst:
[Link: babbazeesbrain.blogspot.com...]
707 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:29:37am |
re: #706 Charles
That's disgusting and a gross misrepresentation of Dawkins and his work.
Now that qualifies as throwing the holocaust around to make your point.
708 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:29:38am |
According to Babbazee, Richard Dawkins is "satanic," and saying anything positive about him is exactly like shilling for the fascist Vlaams Belang!
Talk about going off the fanatical deep end.
709 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:30:22am |
710 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:31:03am |
re: #708 Charles
What is it with former LGF posters? Are they psycho before they come here, or are they so emotionally damaged by being banned from here that their true colors show and they go directly into hyperbole mode?
711 | MandyManners Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:31:13am |
713 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:32:13am |
re: #684 Charles
Oh, I see where this stuff is coming from. BabbaZee is in full on outraged-creationist anti-Dawkins freak-out mode, posting pictures of him surrounded by swastikas.
Good grief.
OK that is terrible. That is throwing the Holocaust around.
And she is a Jew, I thought. If we do not want the memory of our dead to be cheapened, then we can not cheapen it ourselves.
I understand why you are pissed at the trying to smear Dawkins as a Nazi by cherry-picking his quotes. Dawkins is obviously not one.
However, even though the analogy he used, that denying evolution is as stupid and ignorant as denying the Holocaust, is absolutely correct, I still wish that even in a perfectly true context like this, the Holocaust was not brought up. I get what he was saying, but language of the Holocaust should only refer to genocides.
Now, if I take that stance, and mean it, even with Dawkins, who was saying something true, how pissed off do you think I am at the fools making Obama Hitler signs? How much more pissed off do you think I am when some of them are Jews?
It has become fashionable for the shrieking class to compare everyone to Hitler. I hate it. It is the most insensitive thing ever.
714 | Sharmuta Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:32:33am |
re: #708 Charles
According to Babbazee, Richard Dawkins is "satanic," and saying anything positive about him is exactly like shilling for the fascist Vlaams Belang!
Talk about going off the fanatical deep end.
This from one who didn't want to admit VB was fascist until she absolutely couldn't deny it any longer. Feh.
715 | tokyobk Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:33:38am |
re: #706 Charles
Growing up in Philly in the 70's and 80's, I just want to say I am a huge Dawkins fan.
That is such complete bs. (the other, scientist guy) Dawkins was raising hitler (ad absurdum) to address the question of how atheists discover transcendent morality.
Though it does seem that Dawkins signed the Brit academic anti-Israel petition which is a down-ding, imo.
716 | John Neverbend Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:36:28am |
re: #715 tokyobk
Though it does seem that Dawkins signed the Brit academic anti-Israel petition which is a down-ding, imo.
Agreed, and he did make that fatuous statement about the Jewish lobby (or was it the Israel lobby). As I'm sure you would agree, none of that in any detracts from his book which really is very good indeed.
717 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:38:29am |
re: #606 Charles
There's a hell of a lot of effort being expended to demonize Richard Dawkins here. Why is that? And it's based on misleading, out of context quotes.
Well, he has said he would like to see the Catholic church ruined. I'm not a Catholic, but I could understand how a devout Catholic might take umbrage.
718 | jaunte Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:38:38am |
re: #715 tokyobk
Though it does seem that Dawkins signed the Brit academic anti-Israel petition which is a down-ding, imo.
Slight correction:
The following correction was published in the Guardian, Thursday July 11, 2002In the past three months we have published a number of stories, letters and comments about rival petitions launched by university academics proposing, or opposing, the severing of links with Israeli institutions. Recently, some articles have begun to confuse who has signed up to which of two texts critical of Israel and mounted on a joint website (www.pjpo.org). To try to clarify as succinctly as possible: what Oxford professors Colin Blakemore and Richard Dawkins endorsed with others was the call for Europeans to suspend scientific grants and contracts until Israelis "abide by UN resolutions and open serious peace negotiations with the Palestinians". We wrongly listed them as signatories to a separate declaration by the Open University's Steven Rose and others who say they "can no longer in good conscience continue to cooperate with official Israeli institutions including universities".[Link: www.guardian.co.uk...]
719 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:41:17am |
re: #717 Pianobuff
Well, he has said he would like to see the Catholic church ruined. I'm not a Catholic, but I could understand how a devout Catholic might take umbrage.
Quote, please?
720 | tokyobk Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:41:33am |
re: #718 jaunte
fair enough and, as John Neverbend says, none of that detracts from his work.
721 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:44:24am |
re: #719 Charles
Quote, please?
[Link: richarddawkins.net...]
Here's some before and after text.
Why aren't Catholics and ex-Catholics lining up to sue the church into the ground, for a lifetime of psychological damage?
I am not advocating this course of action. Much as I would like to see the Roman Catholic Church ruined, I hate opportunistically retrospective litigation even more. Lawyers who grow fat by digging dirt on long-forgotten wrongs, and hounding their aged perpetrators, are no friends of mine. All I am doing is calling attention to an anomaly. By all means, let's kick a nasty institution when it is down, but there are better ways than litigation. And an obsessive concentration on sexual abuse by priests is in danger of blinding us to all their other forms of child abuse.
It's his opinion, and he's welcome to it, but I could understand why Catholics might not like this statement.
722 | reine.de.tout Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:50:10am |
re: #708 Charles
According to Babbazee, Richard Dawkins is "satanic," and saying anything positive about him is exactly like shilling for the fascist Vlaams Belang!
Talk about going off the fanatical deep end.
Babba, if my dim memory recalls correctly, was a bit off the deep end to begin with.
723 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:50:49am |
re: #716 John Neverbend
Agreed, and he did make that fatuous statement about the Jewish lobby (or was it the Israel lobby). As I'm sure you would agree, none of that in any detracts from his book which really is very good indeed.
Well, if Dawkins signed an Israel boycott petition, I will boycott his books, no matter how good they are.
724 | SixDegrees Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:52:11am |
I feel compelled to point out that there's a difference between opposing a country's policies and opposing the country itself.
725 | Kosh's Shadow Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:52:34am |
re: #718 jaunte
Well, he still signed something against Israel.
Maybe his mind is poisoned by the MSM, but I will not be giving him any of my money, because he's saying it is fine that Israelis get blown up.
726 | Oh no...Sand People! Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:54:20am |
re: #549 avanti
Philosophical question, if man is created in Gods image, why would he need all the human bits ? I've always imagined a supreme being without any physical form, since why would he need one.
I for one love the human body. Though in my ideals currently imperfect. Best thing ever. I believe it is Godlike.
727 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:57:26am |
I feel so awful for the Iranian populace.
THESE are the people that come to mind when I think of the Persians:
728 | Equable Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:58:06am |
Oops, meant for the other thread!
50 duh points for me.
729 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 9:59:12am |
re: #721 Pianobuff
It's his opinion, and he's welcome to it, but I could understand why Catholics might not like this statement.
This quote is in the context of the unbelievable scandal in Ireland, in which the majority of children in Catholic schools and institutions were either abused or molested by priests or nuns.
I'm not quite ready to say I want the Catholic Church "ruined" because of this, but the scale of this monstrous abuse was truly horrific.
730 | Pianobuff Tue, Sep 29, 2009 10:05:35am |
re: #729 Charles
This quote is in the context of the unbelievable scandal in Ireland, in which the majority of children in Catholic schools and institutions were either abused or molested by priests or nuns.
I'm not quite ready to say I want the Catholic Church "ruined" because of this, but the scale of this monstrous abuse was truly horrific.
Which distinguishes you from Mr. Dawkins, to your credit.
731 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 10:13:55am |
re: #729 Charles
This quote is in the context of the unbelievable scandal in Ireland, in which the majority of children in Catholic schools and institutions were either abused or molested by priests or nuns.
I'm not quite ready to say I want the Catholic Church "ruined" because of this, but the scale of this monstrous abuse was truly horrific.
You are correct.
I am not trying to demonize Dawkins or his science. Dawkins also speaks very clearly and precisely. What some people object to, is the very smug and mean way he mocks all religion and declares it all useless.
He has stated himself that he wants to take out faith. Weinberg another staunch atheist, and an even bigger scientist, and he have debated not so much atheism, or science, but rather if Dawkins scorched Earth approach is a good one overall.
Here is Dawkins speaking in 09, at the American Atheists
Please judge for yourself if he has a bit of a grudge with religion. I am not trying to pillory Dawkins. His science is impeccable and he is clearly a brilliant speaker. He is also not exactly fair to people of faith to say the least.
Dawkins is not a nazi. Dawkins is not evil. Dawkins political or religious views are completely seperate from his brilliant science and he should not have his science questioned because of them. Dawkins is someone I would have a drink with and try to speak to as a scientist, why it is possible to not be stupid and still believe in G-d.
732 | Charles Johnson Tue, Sep 29, 2009 10:31:47am |
re: #731 LudwigVanQuixote
I don't think Dawkins has a "grudge" against religion. I think he has very exhaustively thought through his reasoning on this issue, and concluded that overall, religion has not been a good thing for humanity. A "grudge" would be an unreasoning resentment, and I don't see that at all in what Dawkins has written on the subject.
Note that I'm not saying I agree with him on that conclusion. I haven't come to any firm conclusion on this myself.
But after reading "The God Delusion," I just can't agree any more with those who say Dawkins has some kind of knee-jerk anti-religion bias. He's anti-religion, yes -- but it's anything but a knee-jerk reaction.
733 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 10:56:39am |
re: #732 Charles
I don't think Dawkins has a "grudge" against religion. I think he has very exhaustively thought through his reasoning on this issue, and concluded that overall, religion has not been a good thing for humanity. A "grudge" would be an unreasoning resentment, and I don't see that at all in what Dawkins has written on the subject.
Note that I'm not saying I agree with him on that conclusion. I haven't come to any firm conclusion on this myself.
But after reading "The God Delusion," I just can't agree any more with those who say Dawkins has some kind of knee-jerk anti-religion bias. He's anti-religion, yes -- but it's anything but a knee-jerk reaction.
Which is why I call him very well thought out and very well spoken. However, he conflates all of the worst abuses of religious people with the religions themselves in ways that are clearly made to make all people of faith seem stupid, ignorant or hateful.
That is not to say that he has not made many valid points. The Catholic Church's influence in Africa in regards to being anti-condom has cost lives and it is stupid to my view. He correctly pillories all manner of intolerance and brutal behavior in the name of G-d - and I completely agree with that. He correctly points out that it is not Islamophobia to be opposed to abusing women, or anti-Hindu to be opposed to wife burning.
However, he also tries to make all believers look stupid and he does so with great contempt. It is at that point that I have an issue. He tries to paint the act of having faith itself seem utterly stupid. It is not as if his philosophical arguments on the matter don't have equally well thought out counterpoints. He is not the first one to pose the points he makes philosophically, and theologians have been defending the other side for millennia. It is also not as if nothing good has ever come from faith, yet he clearly argues as if that were the case.
This is my beef with him both as a Jew and as a scientist. If your goal is to promote science, then do that. You do not need to go on an offensive that unfairly and unjustly insults many people. I do not have a beef with his science. I share his desire to blunt the hateful aspects of religious fanatics, and for sure, you know I despise science deniers as much as he does.
734 | Mad Prophet Ludwig Tue, Sep 29, 2009 10:58:52am |
And the you in my last post was a general "you"... not a personal you.
735 | Spare O'Lake Tue, Sep 29, 2009 11:56:32am |
Here is the Dawkins CBC interview which I referred to in my comments #511, 540, 578 and 616. They don't give the link until the afternoon.
The comparison of holocaust denial with YEC is at 05:35 of Part II.
[Link: www.cbc.ca...]
Hope this helps to clarify.