WASHINGTON—Claiming that the president was preying on the public’s fear of contracting a fatal disease last week when he declared the H1N1 virus a national emergency, Republican leaders announced Wednesday that they were officially endorsing the swine flu.
Advertisement
354 comments
Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.
The vaccinations are bound to raise questions about whether the Obama girls were given special treatment. The administration is grappling with questions about why the vaccine is not more readily available. Officials, including the secretary of heath and human services, Kathleen Sebelius, say the holdup is with the manufacturers, whose production process has been slower than anticipated.
After reading Friday's “Dennis the Menace” strip, it occurred to me that Barack Obama's fellow commies in the media are using comics as a tool to remake the U.S. into a Maoist state. It is obvious that having Dennis “volunteer” is the first step toward state-sponsored “activities” for children and then state camp indoctrination. Remember the Khmer Rouge child soldiers?
If the ever-vigilant Michelle Bachmann is right, these same camps will later be used to house all conservatives and Tea Baggers that are to be rounded up by black militants and ACORN activists for opposing Dear Leader Obama. And Dennis spraying water in Mr. Wilson's face? That's a thinly veiled threat about coming elder euthanasia programs that will be part of Obama's takeover of health care.
Wake up, America. Watch Glenn Beck. He can explain all of this much better than I can. Sarah Palin/Joe Wilson in 2012.
Oh...and for all this talk about NY 23 this week, I immediately assume they're talking about New York Route 23- a highway I've traversed many a time on both the NY and Massachusetts state lines- wether taking in a minor-lague ballgame, going to one of my uncle's favorite pizza places, visiting a tourist railway, seeing various realtives' gravestones or even driving to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Just as worthwhile for seeing the foliage as the Mohawk Train (route 2) in Massachusetts.
I haven't seen an electoral map of the state of NY, so I don't know if the 23rd distict is anywhere near NY Route 23.
" Other prominent Republicans opposing Obama's declaration of emergency include Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal, who urged residents of his state to continue not washing their hands, and radio host Rush Limbaugh, who made a point of dying of the virus during his show on Wednesday.
I am not a Rush fan by any meaning of the word, but I think that was a bit over the top if you ask me
Holy friggin' crap...what an unwieldy jigsaw piece of upstate NY the 23rd district cover. I thought for sure it would encompass somewhere further downstate like Dutchess or Rockland county.
Reminds me of a Flaming Carrot comics story where some communist dictator type takes over and Flaming Carrot and his friends have to rebel against him. One of the things he does is ban Hagar the Horrible comic stips, because "He is horrible!"
Holy friggin' crap...what an unwieldy jigsaw piece of upstate NY the 23rd district cover. I thought for sure it would encompass somewhere further downstate like Dutchess or Rockland county.
"We're very pleased with the new shape of the 23rd district," said committee chair Geraldine (Gerry) Mander. "It looks like a fluffy bunny. Aw."
A straight reading of the guv's letter laments "the fact that major issues are overlooked while many unnecessary bills come to me for consideration," and concludes, "I believe it is unnecessary to sign this measure at this time."
But a vertical read of the far-left-hand letters in each of the missive's eight lines offers a more blunt explanation: "I f- you."
Schwarzenegger's press secretary, Aaron McLear, insisted Tuesday it was simply a "weird coincidence."
" Other prominent Republicans opposing Obama's declaration of emergency include Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal, who urged residents of his state to continue not washing their hands, and radio host Rush Limbaugh, who made a point of dying of the virus during his show on Wednesday.
I am not a Rush fan by any meaning of the word, but I think that was a bit over the top if you ask me
I didn't quote the whole thing intentionally - I thought the Jindal thing was funny, I didn't think the Rush part was particularity funny - which again is typical classic Onion. When you are trying to do a bunch of jokes in a small amount of text some of them are not going to be funny.
To be fair, I think they had some article where the occupants of an ACLU office were burnt to death by a schizophrenic neo-nazi and ignored Rudy Gulliani's order to evacuate because they didn't want to be seen as endorsing Mayor Guliani's infringement of the neo-nazi's right to free expression.
It's one of the largest geographic districts in the nation - and certainly in the Northeast. But it isn't exactly gerrymandered and at least generally conforms to county boundaries, unlike some of the other districts in NY. NY-8, NY-10, and NY-11 come to mind (carving up Brooklyn and NYC like you wouldn't believe).
Here's an Onion-like story I stumbled across: Team Sarah is trying to help The Iowa Family Policy Center (Right to Life) raise enough $$$ to pay Sarah's speaking fee.
A) It's kind of funny
B) Didn't one of the state reps tell Ahnuld to 'kiss my ass' prior to the veto? Not classy, but not entirely unprovoked, either.
C) If it were me adressing pretty much anything to a San Franfreakshow pol, I'd make sure there was a big gooey glob of my phlegm enclosed.
Fox News Channel anchor Shepard Smith apologized for a "lack of balance" following a political report where the Republican candidate for New Jersey governor was interviewed and the Democratic incumbent wasn't.
Ezekiel 25:17
Den Sam Jackson said: Teh walkies of the Ceiling Cat beliefer iz fightins an stuff by lotza unfair gredy aholes an George Boosh. Mani cheeborgrz 2 teh beliefer cat cuz of bein nice n stuff 2 helpin kitties thru teh scary plaice. He gud beliefer cat and finden losted kitties an such. Ceiling cat gonna pwn demz who fuk wit my budz. U kno mai name iz Ceiling Cat whe I'z scartchin yo ize out n such. (dere be sum despurting bout dis line, but dis as gud as any Ceiling Cat seeds, so et stayin)
Lot iz all "doodz, srsly, crash on my couch." Den He called up teh taco bell ann tey gave it to hiz kitteh.4 All teh drunc doodz went to Lotz place fer teh LOLz5 Teh drunc guyz says to Lot, dood, letz see teh guyz in ur place, we herd dey liek VISIBLE BUTTSEX!
6 Lot goez outside n close teh cat flap.7 He sayz, "oh snap, don't do dat! ewww growss!"8 Lol U can hit my hot daughterz whu r virginz. Let me get em n we kan PENIS GOES WHERE? them. But don't do theze doodz, they iz in mah house.9 Aw no fanks. We iz gonna hit ur door an hav lemmon party. ur gonna get raped fisrt.
OLYMPIA, WA—With random cries of "Enough is enough," "Do something now," and "Huh?" thousands of the nation's biggest morons descended on Washington State this week, some 3,000 miles from their intended destination of the nation's capital.
The march, which had no discernable goal or message, and no official organizers, began at approximately 8:45 a.m. in front of what the morons called the National Mall, but was actually the courtyard outside the Olympia Public Library.
"More government accountability, and transparency, and accountability!" shouted grade-A moron Tammy Caldwell, 37, addressing no one in particular. "On behalf of me, and all the [morons] who came here today, listen up, greedy Washington fat cats: We're not going anywhere until each and every one of our voices is heard."
"To the Lincoln Memorial!" added Caldwell, pointing to a nearby monument dedicated to the memory of Washington State governor John Rankin Rogers.
Every year children of all ages dress up and celebrate Halloween. And every year, Communism is alive and well in every country that celebrates it.
...
Dissent against trick or treaters is not tolerated. You will be ostracized as a crazy, child hating, anti Halloween ideologue, and the media will probably run stories of you. How dare you not give candy to little children!
Hmmm, that sounds oddly familiar to what's happening in our country today. If you dare to have your own opinion of the proposed Communist Healthcare plan, and you stand up for what you believe in, you are deemed a racist, Nazi, and an Astroturfer. Some fear retribution, loss of employment, alienating others, so they quietly protest in their homes, but they are afraid to stand up in public. The same is for those who don’t want their houses toilet papered, egged, or worse. So instead of saying No to Free Candy Handouts, they comply to the threats of the candy dictators.
Those are great. I wonder how my favorite verse comes out...
Micah 6:8
"he has showded u, o kittehs, wut iz gud. An wut doez teh lord want from yuz? 2 be nais, 2 luv givin 2nd chansez An 2 walk humbly wif ur ceilin cat, srsly."
I made a few comments about Halloween being a communist holiday last year, but I was joking. I guess I shouldn't be surprised some people are nutty enough to really believe it.
Hmmm...I want to post a link about something, but I'm not sure wether or not I already did on the same topic (this isn't a blogpimp, either) earlier this month. Is there any way to go back and check the spinoffs beyond the 7 day span or should I just post it again?
Thees awgooments ar in ur computer, teechin ur mind bout teh Ceiling Cat. They ar gud.
...
Telljunt Dezynr
Can says "Oh Hai"? Liek who maik teh littrboxz? Liek who putin niec smelly new littr? Sum catz, riet? Nawt jus anny catz, riet? Reeel smarty catz, meee-ooowww! Can has rubs bellie? Nawt jus anny catz, riet? Niec rubs can has Ceiling Cat. Ceiling Cat has niec littrboxz first anna clumpy littr. Tehn youse catz can has one. Youse skratch, youse sqwat, den youse pee, den youse cover. Niec skratch.
Oh Hai, lookey here! Nawt jus anny littr clump. Who can has maded this niec clumpy pee? Nawt jus anny catz, riet? Must be reeel smarty catz, riet? See? Lookey? Sniffz. Clumpz. Taht splanes it. Ceiling Cat teh Telljunt Dezynr uv reel niec clumpy pee. Ceiling Cat sez so. Srsly. K'Thnxbai.
...
Eeridoosibul Complexitee
Der iz sum fings dat iz so complicatd dat dey had tu be creeatd, cuz if yu taeks wun pees off, dey not wurks anymoar. Liek, der iz teh sofa, an it iz gud fr sleeping. But if yu taeks teh pillow off, it not gud anymoar! Cleerly, teh sofa cood not evolv. LOLZ. If yu finks teh sofa evolvd, yu iz stoopid. we wearz nawchoes kaythnxbai
I made a few comments about Halloween being a communist holiday last year, but I was joking. I guess I shouldn't be surprised some people are nutty enough to really believe it.
It's a Paulian site. They are nutty beyond anything we can even imagine.
And the Pam predictably has her knickers in a twist about it.
*snip*
"Rifqa then arrived back to Ohio on Tuesday October 27’th. Upon her arrival came a new set of restrictions that her parents and Muslim attorneys have been trying to impose on her from the beginning…solitary confinement! While Rifqa was being protected in Florida, they repeatedly tried to separate Rifqa from other Christians that she leaned on for strength and encouragement. Rifqa’s Muslim parents have been saying from the beginning that they don’t believe that Rifqa became a Christian on her own accord, rather they believe that her real problem is that she has been brain washed by other people through facebook and over the phone."
A few years ago I was caught off guard by Halloween. I had no candy in the house and the first little girl knocked on the door dressed as a princess. I panicked an put a small handful of pistachios in the little girl's bag. She turned to her mom and said, "I don't want pistachiooos!"
I don't think a pocket Constitution would go over much better.
"I did not realize that until the code talkers were recognized that all the victories back during the war came about because of our Diné language," he said.
"Sometimes I think about it," he said. "Why did the government want to use our language when throughout BIA school we would get our mouth washed out with soap when they caught us speaking Navajo?
"I am proud to be a code talker," he said. "And I know we counted for something great, and that we fought to maintain our freedom and for our sacred land."
Hey, great news everybody. The Cash for Clunkers program, which handed out up to $4500 discounts for car purchases, only cost the taxpayers $24,000 per car!
And didn't generate significant increases in sales.
I was with some auto dealers today and wondered if any of the ones that participated in the Cash for Clunkers program would ever see dime one from the feds.
Hey, great news everybody. The Cash for Clunkers program, which handed out up to $4500 discounts for car purchases, only cost the taxpayers $24,000 per car!
And didn't generate significant increases in sales.
Huzzah!
Best of all, it helped bury people further into debt for a depreciating asset. Just like Uncle Same!
A $50/year membership fee isn't all that unaffordable, really.
Frankly, I'd prefer they bought from such deep-discount vendors whenever possible. nothing pisses me off more than the gas station convenience store with the WIC/Food Stamp stickers on the window. US taxpayer dropping $7.00 a quart for old milk!
Hey, great news everybody. The Cash for Clunkers program, which handed out up to $4500 discounts for car purchases, only cost the taxpayers $24,000 per car!
And didn't generate significant increases in sales.
Huzzah!
I was just reading about this at Am Thinker as you posted...the BO admin has been very quiet about this and hardly touted the 'success' of C4C...nobody has been on the TV shows or in the papers...looking at the numbers, it appears to be a bust...if not, why don't we celebrate and do it again?
A few years ago I was caught off guard by Halloween. I had no candy in the house and the first little girl knocked on the door dressed as a princess. I panicked an put a small handful of pistachios in the little girl's bag. She turned to her mom and said, "I don't want pistachiooos!"
I don't think a pocket Constitution would go over much better.
Well, here's a heads up:
Halloween is upon us.
Go now, buy candy.
As it happens, Focus on the Family provides its employees health insurance through Principal, an insurance company that covers "abortion services." A Focus spokeswoman confirmed the fact that the organization pays premiums to Principal, but declined to comment on whether that amounts to an indirect funding of abortion.
Even if the specific plan Focus uses for its employees doesn't include abortion coverage--and I'm assuming it doesn't--the organization and its employees still pay premiums to a company that funds abortions. If health reform proposals have a fungibility problem, then Focus does as well. And if they don't think they do have a fungibility problem, then it would be interesting to hear why they think the set-up proposed in health reform legislation is so untenable.
Come to think of it, how many surviving members of the Tuskeegee Airmen or 442nd Infantry regiment are still with us? These guys (and the code-talkers) would've had every reason in the world to proverbially 'sit this one out' given how they had been wronged and marginalized, but they put their asses on the line for this country because they believed in something greater than themselves.
A few years ago I was caught off guard by Halloween. I had no candy in the house and the first little girl knocked on the door dressed as a princess. I panicked an put a small handful of pistachios in the little girl's bag. She turned to her mom and said, "I don't want pistachiooos!"
I don't think a pocket Constitution would go over much better.
you're generous...I would never part with my pistachios
A few years ago I was caught off guard by Halloween. I had no candy in the house and the first little girl knocked on the door dressed as a princess. I panicked an put a small handful of pistachios in the little girl's bag. She turned to her mom and said, "I don't want pistachiooos!"
I don't think a pocket Constitution would go over much better.
Ok, I jumped the shark on that one. You are both correct. $50.00 a year isn't really all that much and being able to buy in bulk at a discounted rate is in fact a wise use of limited (Government supplied) funds.
Come to think of it, how many surviving members of the Tuskeegee Airmen or 442nd Infantry regiment are still with us? These guys (and the code-talkers) would've had every reason in the world to proverbially 'sit this one out' given how they had been wronged and marginalized, but they put their asses on the line for this country because they believed in something greater than themselves.
Seems like a far cry from today...
Our town lost Sherman Rose (Airman) a year ago. A mural of him, his
students, and a P-51 is opposite our convention center.
The Navajo tend to be very patriotic Americans. Last time I was on the reservation, I took photos of a Veterans' cemetery that had tons of US flags all over it. The Code Talkers are passing on as fast as the rest of the WWII veterans.
People who buy their groceries at gas station convenience stores are either crazy, suicidal, or have no car and live a very long way from anything else.
Come to think of it, how many surviving members of the Tuskeegee Airmen or 442nd Infantry regiment are still with us? These guys (and the code-talkers) would've had every reason in the world to proverbially 'sit this one out' given how they had been wronged and marginalized, but they put their asses on the line for this country because they believed in something greater than themselves.
Seems like a far cry from today...
well said...and as an aside, just today I was at a very remote saloon out in the boonies and two Native Americans, a man and a woman, were speaking to each other in their native tongue...it was beautiful and I'd never heard that before...I could not help but stand there and eaves drop a bit
People who buy their groceries at gas station convenience stores are either crazy, suicidal, or have no car and live a very long way from anything else.
Congressman Steve King tells NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell he should either apologize to Limbaugh or make the same criticism to Fergie and JLo. WTF or heh, I can't decide.
Wow, tell me again how Rush Limbaugh is the not the head of the GOP.
The Navajo tend to be very patriotic Americans. Last time I was on the reservation, I took photos of a Veterans' cemetery that had tons of US flags all over it. The Code Talkers are passing on as fast as the rest of the WWII veterans.
there were Comanche code talkers used in WW2 also...a terrific story of all included
The Navajo tend to be very patriotic Americans. Last time I was on the reservation, I took photos of a Veterans' cemetery that had tons of US flags all over it. The Code Talkers are passing on as fast as the rest of the WWII veterans.
I first heard about the code-talkers in a short Reader's Digest article...probably 15 or 20 years ago. From their own accounts, they needed very little encouragement to enlist after Pearl Harbor- some of them even lying about their age.
I stumbled across a Memorial Day parade for Veterans of the 4 tribes (Navajo, Apache, Hopi, Zuni) on a reservation in Arizona. Some of the Veterans marching in the parade with Mini-14s slung over their shoulders would break ranks, put on armbands identifying them as tribal policemen and relieve the Policemen working the parade route and traffic control.
I read about this when she first published the photo. She yanked it the next day, and started whining about how she wasn't a slut, despite what the bulk of her comments claimed.
People who buy their groceries at gas station convenience stores are either crazy, suicidal, or have no car and live a very long way from anything else.
I buy my groceries at a gas station, you insensitive clod!
Wow, tell me again how Rush Limbaugh is the not the head of the GOP.
Don't know if you guys saw the Der Spiegel interview with Charles Krauthammer, but the interviewer suggested that he might very well be the de facto leader of the GOP.
The Navajo tend to be very patriotic Americans. Last time I was on the reservation, I took photos of a Veterans' cemetery that had tons of US flags all over it. The Code Talkers are passing on as fast as the rest of the WWII veterans.
I had an album of Navajo war songs. Some were a hundred years old,
one was about Korea. It was all very seamless.
Mike DiGiovanni, GM's executive director of global market and industry analysis, also told reporters that the payback from the government's Cash for Clunkers rebates that depressed U.S. auto sales in September should be over.
"We're through that for the most part," he said during a sales preview discussion. "We think it paid back in August and September."
what does this jibberish mean in your opinion?...imo this does not resolve the debate at all
No to mention that the Obama administration was also trying to get "clunkers" off the road. They got almost 700,000 such cars destroyed.
Hooray! And if you were the owner trying to sell such a car a-la putting it in your driveway or by the side of the road with a 'FOR SALE' sign in the window and a phone #, you would've been competing directly with a $4500 subsidised rebate from the Gov't!
'Choice & Competiton' as Nancy Pelosi would say [never mind that your competitot can undercut you, write it's own laws and regulations on the fly, etc etc]
/Or maybe it was 'jobs jobs jobs' San Fran Nan said...I can't keep track
People who buy their groceries at gas station convenience stores are either crazy, suicidal, or have no car and live a very long way from anything else.
In Detroit, the latter is often the problem. All of the major grocery stores have pulled out of the city over the years, and very large tracts of it are referred to as a "food desert," with party stores being the only place to buy food, and things like fresh meat and produce nowhere to be found unless you count what they shove across the counter at BK or McD's. And there's no public transportation to speak of, either, so in many cases people are simply shut off from access to what so many people take for granted - fresh food at reasonable prices.
Hooray! And if you were the owner trying to sell such a car a-la putting it in your driveway or by the side of the road with a 'FOR SALE' sign in the window and a phone #, you would've been competing directly with a $4500 subsidised rebate from the Gov't!
'Choice & Competiton' as Nancy Pelosi would say [never mind that your competitot can undercut you, write it's own laws and regulations on the fly, etc etc]
/Or maybe it was 'jobs jobs jobs' San Fran Nan said...I can't keep track
I agree it is BS, but it was stated goal of the program to get those cars off the road.
No to mention that the Obama administration was also trying to get "clunkers" off the road. They got almost 700,000 such cars destroyed.
According to Edmunds, the delta created by CfC was more on the order of 150k. The remaining cars would have been traded in/sold in the normal course of events, without the CfC incentives.
Just to clarify as I sort of muddled that comment: what I meant to write is that Krauthammer is, sadly, among the most capable and articulate of the conservative punditry at this point. I didn't mean to imply that he's actually the effective voice of the GOP, as he's obviously not; Rush and Beck and others of their ilk clearly have far more influence.
Just to clarify as I sort of muddled that comment: what I meant to write is that Krauthammer is, sadly, among the most capable and articulate of the conservative punditry at this point. I didn't mean to imply that he's actually the effective voice of the GOP, as he's obviously not; Rush and Beck and others of their ilk clearly have far more influence.
I could think of worse people to be de facto voices..
That flat out sucks. I live quite close to a lot of things and, knowing the truth of what you posted, I never take my proximity to such sources for granted.
There is a definite lack of reasonable pundits on the right. We're flooded with fringers like beck and malkin and coulter, when we need much more reasonable people like CK and David Frum (and Meghan McCain?) to articulate real conservative principles, and not this theocratic parody of "conservatism" that we're getting spoon fed to the right-wing masses.
In Detroit, the latter is often the problem. All of the major grocery stores have pulled out of the city over the years, and very large tracts of it are referred to as a "food desert," with party stores being the only place to buy food, and things like fresh meat and produce nowhere to be found unless you count what they shove across the counter at BK or McD's. And there's no public transportation to speak of, either, so in many cases people are simply shut off from access to what so many people take for granted - fresh food at reasonable prices.
Lizards, I need your help. I am so pissed right now. I just got off the phone with my son, and I'm hyperventilating. He told me that his wife "doesn't believe in vaccinations." I screamed DON'T YOU DARE RISK THE LIVES OF MY GRANDKIDS! YOU TAKE THEM TO A CLINIC THIS INSTANT!
Anyway I came here and clicked on "Resources" but did not find a list of sites for pro-vax. I told my son that I was sending him a bunch of links explaining how dangerous it is not to vaccinate his kids, MY GRANDKIDS.
I did not know my daughter-in-law was this nuts. I don't like to interfere in my kids' family matters BUT DAMN IT, MY GRANDKIDS' LIVES ARE AT STAKE HERE.
I think he's saying that the cash for clunker program encouraged people to buy so those looking for a new car all jumped in at once. When the program ended sales slowed down temporarily but they're picking back up again.
According to Edmunds, the delta created by CfC was more on the order of 150k. The remaining cars would have been traded in/sold in the normal course of events, without the CfC incentives.
C4C was just a simple scam to redistribute taxpayer money to people that had no reason to deserve such a deal...of course I wanted it to fail, but how could it if the consideration to get junkers off the road is supposedly the main reason for doing it...and now, after depressing the market in such an unnatural fashion sales are picking up?...good grief, what an interpretation of success
And what exactly has 0bama done to prove that he isn't naiive when it comes to foreign policy?
Iran? Honduras? Russia? Israel?
Well, my main point is that Krauthammer is in no position to call into question anyone else's grasp of foreign policy. Having recently read through a decade of the fellow's columns, I've discovered him to have been even more hilariously wrong in his predictions than even Thomas Friedman, who himself declared Putin to be a great reformer back in 2001.
As for Obama, has he perpetrated some foreign policy disaster that I've missed? And would you compare him unfavorably to any of our last several presidents in that regard?
Tell him to take her to an old cemetery and show her all the tombstones of infants and children who died very young, and in great numbers, before there were vaccines.
Tell him to take her to an old cemetery and show her all the tombstones of infants and children who died very young, and in great numbers, before there were vaccines.
I already told him that diptheria and whooping cough are coming back in the UK and Canada, and that his kids MY GRANDKIDS could die.
I don't think I've ever set foot in Indiana, but I kinda had that shot pegged as quintessential Indiana- small town symbolized by the water tower & buildings in the background, vital transportation crossroads embodied by the locomotives and passionate about hoops, symbolized by the by the court in the foreground.
I don't normally read that much into pictures of...say...Bettie Paige in her prime.
Lots of different reasons. A few of them: high crime; high insurance; high taxes; widespread poverty; a mandatory "living wage" ordinance forcing them to pay roughly $14.00 per hour (somewhat less, if they offered full medical benefits); open hostility from some quarters who insisted that the chains were another example of white folks exploiting black folks; high utility rates...all manner of negatives that had a huge impact on a business with a razor-thin profit margin to begin with, even in lucrative markets.
Well, my main point is that Krauthammer is in no position to call into question anyone else's grasp of foreign policy. Having recently read through a decade of the fellow's columns, I've discovered him to have been even more hilariously wrong in his predictions than even Thomas Friedman, who himself declared Putin to be a great reformer back in 2001.
As for Obama, has he perpetrated some foreign policy disaster that I've missed? And would you compare him unfavorably to any of our last several presidents in that regard?
getting his ass kicked by Putin and the Honduras switcheroo could be considered disasterous for them...was this a trick question?
Lots of different reasons. A few of them: high crime; high insurance; high taxes; widespread poverty; a mandatory "living wage" ordinance forcing them to pay roughly $14.00 per hour (somewhat less, if they offered full medical benefits); open hostility from some quarters who insisted that the chains were another example of white folks exploiting black folks; high utility rates...all manner of negatives that had a huge impact on a business with a razor-thin profit margin to begin with, even in lucrative markets.
Where exactly was the 'stimulus' if the dealers- already troubled by slumping sales- are left holding the bag for the $4500 rebate?
Dude, I'm not arguing with you. My point is that Obama doesn't see this as a failure, in fact he believes it was a raging success. Personally, I think it was idiotic and I think helping the car companies is a huge waste of precious resources.
So far, 0bama's demonstrated a willingness to hold a dialogue with thugs and despots with zero preconditions while ignoring or even chiding our allies. In fact, I think he even campaigned on the latter...
Lizards, I need your help. I am so pissed right now. I just got off the phone with my son, and I'm hyperventilating. He told me that his wife "doesn't believe in vaccinations." I screamed DON'T YOU DARE RISK THE LIVES OF MY GRANDKIDS! YOU TAKE THEM TO A CLINIC THIS INSTANT!
Anyway I came here and clicked on "Resources" but did not find a list of sites for pro-vax. I told my son that I was sending him a bunch of links explaining how dangerous it is not to vaccinate his kids, MY GRANDKIDS.
I did not know my daughter-in-law was this nuts. I don't like to interfere in my kids' family matters BUT DAMN IT, MY GRANDKIDS' LIVES ARE AT STAKE HERE.
Shit. Shit. Shit. Shit. Shit.
Breathe.
Do you know what it is she has against vaccinations?
So far, 0bama's demonstrated a willingness to hold a dialogue with thugs and despots with zero preconditions while ignoring or even chiding our allies. In fact, I think he even campaigned on the latter...
So far, 0bama's demonstrated a willingness to hold a dialogue with thugs and despots with zero preconditions while ignoring or even chiding our allies. In fact, I think he even campaigned on the latter...
Oh, and his non-handling of the deaths of Iranian citizens at the hands of ShortShit.
Oh, and his non-handling of the deaths of Iranian citizens at the hands of ShortShit.
did he ever explain his higher tech, less expensive missile defense for the Poles and Czechs?...I don't recall...Putin slapped him from here into next year on that one...support with dealing with Iran?...hahaha!...swing anda miss
CNN has a special section devoted to answering questions, concerns, etc. (geared for the United States...) here's the link... Sanja Gupta has repeatedly stated how imperative it is for children (especially young children) to get the vaccination...(here in Canada there have already been a number of children who have died -- one was a hockey player, in top physical health, etc.)
I did not know my daughter-in-law was this nuts. I don't like to interfere in my kids' family matters BUT DAMN IT, MY GRANDKIDS' LIVES ARE AT STAKE HERE.
Shit. Shit. Shit. Shit. Shit.
Alouette--
You're getting a lot of good info from the lizards, but DIL's attitude
isn't based on rationality, and probably won't yield easily to reason.
The hard answer is to find the basis of her fear and gently unwind it.
In the meantime, insist on a high level of surveillance. While vax is
the way to go, staying on top of every sniffle will get the kids to
good modern corrective medicine. Be a PITA.
The catch is, the older locomotives don't have to be scrapped. In fact, there have been instances of large railways like the BNSF retiring dozens of 30-40 year old SD40s in anticipation of an order of locomotives, selling the SD40s off to a leasing company and then immediately leasing them back because the new locomotives aren't being built fast enough.
The other problem is that the 'gensets' and 'green goats' still have some flaws that need to be worked out and are of relatively low horsepower (2000 HP maximum) and only useful in yard or local service, not reigonal or long-distance road service.
It's an example of how your opinion is outside the mainstream. The implication that Obama has failed because he shook hands with Khadafi, when in actuality both parties are willing to be diplomatic.
Personally, I'm not afraid of diplomacy. I agree with Barret Brown above, I don't consider diplomacy a failure.
It's an example of how your opinion is outside the mainstream. The implication that Obama has failed because he shook hands with Khadafi, when in actuality both parties are willing to be diplomatic.
Personally, I'm not afraid of diplomacy. I agree with Barret Brown above, I don't consider diplomacy a failure.
what diplomacy are you referring to?...and I've not mentioned Khadafi
So...0bama being courteous to Ghadaffi or tHugo Chavez should overshoadow his being dismissive and snide to Gordon Brown or John Howard?
/Jayzus J-damn Christ, we have the prime ministers of Canada and France using more forceful and unambiguous language against despotic and terrorist-sponsoring regimes than this administration.
Trumpeting a victory against careless spending, President Barack Obama on Wednesday signed a defense bill that kills some costly weapons projects and expands war efforts. In a major civil rights change, the law also makes it a federal hate crime to assault people based on sexual orientation.
The measure expands current hate crimes law to include violence based on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. To assure its passage after years of frustrated efforts, Democratic supporters attached the measure to the must-pass defense policy bill over the steep objections of many Republicans.
I fully expect the usual suspects to be outraged. Stacy McCain is likely red in the face as we speak.
/Jayzus J-damn Christ, we have the prime ministers of Canada and France using more forceful and unambiguous language against despotic and terrorist-sponsoring regimes than this administration
Don't you think that is quite intentional? In the big picture, one of the worries/complaints about the previous approach to foreign policy was that the continuous burden on the US to play the "cop" in these situations meant that our allies often got a free ride from taking on the harder responsibilities. It would be very much in keeping with the goals of multilateral and international peace-keeping to encourage nations like Canada and France to play the harder line than they have in the previous decade or two.
Let me try that last post again since it has a ph number in it, and those usually get yanked:
Where can I get more information?
* Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
[Link: www.cdc.gov...]
* American Academy of Pediatrics
[Link: www.aap.org...] External Web Site Policy
* The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
[Link: www.vaccine.chop.edu...]
* Immunization Action Coalition (IAC)
[Link: www.immunize.org...] External Web Site Policy
* Every Child By Two
[Link: www.ecbt.org...] External Web Site Policy
So...0bama being courteous to Ghadaffi or tHugo Chavez should overshoadow his being dismissive and snide to Gordon Brown or John Howard?
/Jayzus J-damn Christ, we have the prime ministers of Canada and France using more forceful and unambiguous language against despotic and terrorist-sponsoring regimes than this administration.
John Howard? The guy-who-is-not-in-office John Howard? And it's a lot easier for Canada to talk big, they're not exactly a superpower. Forceful language is great when it's useful, but if it's actually counterproductive to our goals, what good is it?
“I cannot vote for the Defense Authorization bill with this hate crimes legislation attached to it, this is radical, social policy. It’s offensive to me and a lot of my members, that’s why I will vote no and will urge my colleagues to vote no,” Boehner said at his weekly press conference.
Canada's military has suffered more per-capita casualties in Afghanistan than the US or UK. Whatever their feelings are on the matter, they've more than earned their right to speak out.
so what exactly is a hate crime and how is it different from a crime?
One thing I've read several times (last in a comment by iceweasel) that makes a lot of sense to me is that a hate crime is both the actual crime and an act of terrorism, because it is designed (and actually works) to scare the population into following certain political or moral or religious believes the perpetrator has. Say, gay bashing is both an assault and an attempt to scare gays into hiding using violence, thus terrorism.
I'm not sure it is terrorism (though I guess it could be), but there is an element of making a social statement that goes along with the classic "hate" crimes.
what's that got to do with being on the wrong side of the Honduras issue or folding like a napkin to Putin?
What would you have proposed Obama do differently when it came to Russia? Talk tough, order them to do something against their interests and have negotiations shut down? Should we invade Georgia? Should we have ourselves another Cold War? Pine for those old days of Reagan, when Rocky beat Ivan Drago...
You seem to want magical results from Obama immediately on everything. As if he were a genie, and that he can just wave his magic wand, wiggle his nose and thaw out Russian relations overnight. I suspect your confirmation bias against Oabam is overwhelming.
so what exactly is a hate crime and how is it different from a crime?
The perpetrator in a hate crime targets the victim because of their membership in a certain group. As the crime's motive itself is deemed damaging to the individual, the group they are a member of, and society as a whole, the penalty is more severe.
at 17:24 on October 28, 2009, EDT.
Jonathan Montpetit, THE CANADIAN PRESS
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - A bloody week for coalition forces in Kandahar got worse Wednesday when a Canadian soldier was killed and two others injured by an improvised explosive device in the ever-hostile Panjwaii district.
Lt. Justin Garrett Boyes, 26, of 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Light Infantry based in Edmonton, Alta., was only 10 days into his second tour in Afghanistan when his foot patrol was struck by the blast 20 kilometres southwest of Kandahar city.
Boyes was leading a platoon tasked with mentoring Afghan National Police officers at the time of the explosion. The two other casualties were treated at the Role 3 Hospital at Kandahar Airfield and are listed in good condition.
It's hard to see this as "radical social policy" in any light. I don't care much for the legislation myself, because the crimes it covers are already crimes, and the pressure for every self-identifying group to carve out it's own "special" protections seems to me to lead inevitably toward a Federally-controlled criminal system, with state powers usurped.
But "radical social policy"? I don't think so. This is a mouthful of buzzwords intended to deflect and inflame, not to stake out a rational, thoughtful position. Is there something wrong with arguing that such legislation inevitably weakens Federalism and moves control of the legal system farther away from the citizens affected by it?
One thing I've read several times (last in a comment by iceweasel) that makes a lot of sense to me is that a hate crime is both the actual crime and an act of terrorism, because it is designed (and actually works) to scare the population into following certain political or moral or religious believes the perpetrator has. Say, gay bashing is both an assault and an attempt to scare gays into hiding using violence, thus terrorism.
so who decides that?...how does one determine the difference between a stick-up and terrorism?
Also, I read that one important goal of hate crime legislation is that to distinguish these crimes and record them explicitly sheds some light on how prevalant they are, where and how they occur.
Sorry.
It sounded like you were inferring from your question that Russia has stepped back and gone back on whatever deal they made. I was just asking since I had not heard that, but thought this were still moving along.
Well, my main point is that Krauthammer is in no position to call into question anyone else's grasp of foreign policy. Having recently read through a decade of the fellow's columns, I've discovered him to have been even more hilariously wrong in his predictions than even Thomas Friedman
True dat. And being more wrong than Friedman is quite the feat.
(I guess it's not really Friedman's fault though. He's just getting his insights from the wrong cabdrivers...)
Canada's military has suffered more per-capita casualties in Afghanistan than the US or UK. Whatever their feelings are on the matter, they've more than earned their right to speak out.
Don't you ever fucking forget that.
You have 100% avoided my point, puffing up your chest like a ruffled rooster because you know I'm correct. They're not a superpower. They. Are. Not. Our country is most of their economy. They are DEPENDENT on us. A dependent. Like a child. No matter how many troops they lose, that doesn't magically make them a superpower.
So don't you ever forget that. A prost to masculine bluster!
And he wasn't president then. He was campaigning. Presidents have different responsibilities than Senators!
it's just like albusteve, you don't want to acknowledge the realities of campaigning for president. Campaigns are full of shit. A steady stream of it. From both parties, every election, since time immemorial.
What would you have proposed Obama do differently when it came to Russia? Talk tough, order them to do something against their interests and have negotiations shut down? Should we invade Georgia? Should we have ourselves another Cold War? Pine for those old days of Reagan, when Rocky beat Ivan Drago...
You seem to want magical results from Obama immediately on everything. As if he were a genie, and that he can just wave his magic wand, wiggle his nose and thaw out Russian relations overnight. I suspect your confirmation bias against Oabam is overwhelming.
we should have put the missile defense system in east Europe like we promised...instead we stiffed our allies, the Poles and Czechs, for Putins help with the Iran situation...who gained what?...Putin has an obvious interest in Iran bullying America and the EU...and why all the histrionics about invasions etc?
Oh please. So, tell us, we (Canada) cuts off the oil supply to the United States-- and go look up the stats while you're at it, if you don't realize yet who is your major oil and gas supplier (that's Canada -- not S. ARabis or any other middle eastern country) -- and tell us who's in a state of "dependency."
OT: "DETROIT - Federal authorities said a leader of what they described as a nationwide radical fundamentalist Sunni Islam group was fatally shot Wednesday during an FBI raid in the Detroit area."
One thing I've read several times (last in a comment by iceweasel) that makes a lot of sense to me is that a hate crime is both the actual crime and an act of terrorism, because it is designed (and actually works) to scare the population into following certain political or moral or religious believes the perpetrator has. Say, gay bashing is both an assault and an attempt to scare gays into hiding using violence, thus terrorism.
OK. But the current state of affairs is special protections extended to a laundry-list of disparate special interest groups. If terrorism is the basis, then these individual, group-oriented bills are pointless; a finding that the crime was intended to instill terror in any reasonable sense extends such protections to any and all cases, not simply those particular favored groups on The List.
If I get beaten to a pulp for being Irish, that's presumably every bit as much a hate crime as being beaten to a pulp because I'm gay. But there's no special protection for the Irish on the books, so I'd be out of luck pursuing such charges against my attacker. And if I manage to get such legislation passed, it doesn't do any good if, on another occasion, I get beaten to a pulp because of my Scottish heritage. Or later on, my German heritage. And so on.
It's easy to perceive this as simple pandering for votes, although my earlier criticism - that it represents a corrosion of Federalism - is of greater concern.
You might not be aware of this... but to get oil from the west of Canada to the east of Canada the flow goes through the US... not to mention the reimportation of refined product...
The perpetrator in a hate crime targets the victim because of their membership in a certain group. As the crime's motive itself is deemed damaging to the individual, the group they are a member of, and society as a whole, the penalty is more severe.
how is that determined?...if you mug someone and kill them, how would the perp know his victim was gay?...and if he did, you'd consider it terrorism...not going for it
It's hard to see this as "radical social policy" in any light. I don't care much for the legislation myself, because the crimes it covers are already crimes, and the pressure for every self-identifying group to carve out it's own "special" protections seems to me to lead inevitably toward a Federally-controlled criminal system, with state powers usurped.
On the other hand it provides a mechanism for the feds to step in and prosecute in cases where the locals refuse to do so, much like civil rights violations.
True. However, to quote from a former Premier of Alberta -- let those eastern bastards freeze in the dark...(lol...and the "dependency" meme shrinks ever smaller).
Do argue that point, please. I say it's equal protection. It's protection from unequal persecution. You didn't actually buy that lie that the mere fact of being gay, e.g., makes a crime against you a hate crime?
It's not the anti-gay that makes it more heinous. It's the attempt to send a message to/intimidate all members of a certain group that makes hate crimes a special class of crime: they are attempts at sending a message that goes beyond the individual victim, to everyone else who shares that victim's targeted characteristic, whether it's race, religion, sexual orientation.
That's the rationale behind considering them a special class of crime.
There are more than one crime often being committed in any given physical setting. Your hypothetical situation is just that - an idealized case. In the real world, where individuals may be attacked for a variety of reasons, there is reason to believe that certain groups get attacked as an expression of hatred towards a specified group. Examples usually given include homosexuals and racial/ethnic minorities.
On the other hand it provides a mechanism for the feds to step in and prosecute in cases where the locals refuse to do so, much like civil rights violations.
Exactly so. That's one of the reasons it's most necessary, frankly.
we should have put the missile defense system in east Europe like we promised...instead we stiffed our allies, the Poles and Czechs, for Putins help with the Iran situation...who gained what?...Putin has an obvious interest in Iran bullying America and the EU...and why all the histrionics about invasions etc?
You think the Poles wanted that shit in their front yards? My understanding is that the average Pole was averse to the idea because it made them a target when they wouldn't have been one before.
Do you have a problem in general with crimes having differing penalties based on the motive or state of mind of the perpetrator? For example manslaughter versus first or second degree murder.
As to why hate crimes are considered more heinous, I'll quote from the justification section of the Wikipedia article as it's decent:
Justifications for harsher punishments for hate crimes focus on the notion that hate crimes cause greater individual and societal harm. It is said that, when the core of a person’s identity is attacked, the degradation and dehumanization is especially severe, and additional emotional and physiological problems are likely to result. Society then, in turn, can suffer from the disempowerment of a group of people. Furthermore, it is asserted that the chances for retaliatory crimes are greater when a hate crime has been committed.
Your point was basically 'Canada has no legs to stand on' and should be seen and not heard because they don't have superpower status. Harper and Sarkozy are using the tone regarding the mullahs, the post-election crackdown and the nuclear program that I would've preferred the White House used...(Y'know- 'shooting unarmed demonstrators stuck in traffic bad'). But hey...let's shift the argument from what Canada and France have to say re: Iran and the mullahs to 'well- they aren't superpowers, so fuck 'em'.
Yet...I'm sure you were singing a different tune when Chretien or Chirac were in opposition to the Iraq war.
It's not the anti-gay that makes it more heinous. It's the attempt to send a message to/intimidate all members of a certain group that makes hate crimes a special class of crime: they are attempts at sending a message that goes beyond the individual victim, to everyone else who shares that victim's targeted characteristic, whether it's race, religion, sexual orientation.
That's the rationale behind considering them a special class of crime.
I understand the rationale, I just disagree with it...trying to read someones mind about sending messages is simply not the role of the prosecutors
Did you at all read what I wrote? Burning a cross, hate crime. Murder? is murder. Murder, while making it clear that you murder that person for being gay, and that other gay people should fear the same? murder AND hate crime.
You think the Poles wanted that shit in their front yards? My understanding is that the average Pole was averse to the idea because it made them a target when they wouldn't have been one before.
why would that make them a target?...if they were that would certainly be offensive and even more reason to have a defense system in place...Putin argued a strawman and BO ate it up
I should have the freedom to murder whomever I want without fear of it being mistakenly identified as a hate crime by some outrageously over sensitive progressive know-it-all!
/
OK. But the current state of affairs is special protections extended to a laundry-list of disparate special interest groups. If terrorism is the basis, then these individual, group-oriented bills are pointless; a finding that the crime was intended to instill terror in any reasonable sense extends such protections to any and all cases, not simply those particular favored groups on The List.
If I get beaten to a pulp for being Irish, that's presumably every bit as much a hate crime as being beaten to a pulp because I'm gay. But there's no special protection for the Irish on the books, so I'd be out of luck pursuing such charges against my attacker. And if I manage to get such legislation passed, it doesn't do any good if, on another occasion, I get beaten to a pulp because of my Scottish heritage. Or later on, my German heritage. And so on.
It's easy to perceive this as simple pandering for votes, although my earlier criticism - that it represents a corrosion of Federalism - is of greater concern.
That 'laundry list' is not based on money or something, it's based on which groups are actually systematically discriminated against and persecuted. that's why the Irish are not on it, although way back, when they were considered colored (not a coincidence) they would have been.
A gay man is beaten to death because he is walking down the street: wrong place/wrong time.
A straight man is beaten to death because he is walking down the street; wrong place/wrong time.
You can't see which is the more heinous crime?
Equally wrong.
Unless it is proven that the gay man was targeted because he was gay. Then it is a hate crime. Same as if a victim is targeted for being black, or white, or asian, or whatever. Hate is hate.
I understand the rationale, I just disagree with it...trying to read someones mind about sending messages is simply not the role of the prosecutors
But that's the fearmongering meme behind opposition to hate crimes legislation: that it will result in creating a category of 'thought crime'. It won't. Not every assault on a gay person (for example) is a hate crime. Some clearly are.
In any case, it very often is central already to prosecution (and defense) that a determination about a person's state of mind be made-- it makes the difference between premeditated murder and justifiable homicide/murder in self defense, etc. Lots of others crimes as well.
I understand the rationale, I just disagree with it...trying to read someones mind about sending messages is simply not the role of the prosecutors
In a lot of cases there's evidence, for example anti-Semitic literature in the home of the guy who shot the guard at the Holocaust Memorial or whatever it was.
It's not the anti-gay that makes it more heinous. It's the attempt to send a message to/intimidate all members of a certain group that makes hate crimes a special class of crime: they are attempts at sending a message that goes beyond the individual victim, to everyone else who shares that victim's targeted characteristic, whether it's race, religion, sexual orientation.
That's the rationale behind considering them a special class of crime.
And yet the current legislation is very explicitly about extending protections to gays - not to any other group. If the crime is intimidation of some sort of group, then such protections ought to be extended to all, with the focus shifted from the particular target back to intent. Instead, we are creating a patchwork of special protections for very specific groups who happen to command the most public attention at the moment - or who are considered an attractive voting block deserving of political favoritism.
Again: If I get beaten because I'm Polish, that's every bit as heinous as if I'm beaten for being black. But under current legislation, there's no special protection extended to me as a Pole. So it's bad to beat people up with their blackness as an underlying motivation, but it's OK to do exactly the same when their Polish ancestry is the motivation?
I think it's obvious why people aren't happy with this sort of thing. It certainly appears that some folks are more equal than others.
Did you at all read what I wrote? Burning a cross, hate crime. Murder? is murder. Murder, while making it clear that you murder that person for being gay, and that other gay people should fear the same? murder AND hate crime.
oh please...murder displays hate, wouldn't you say?...you are splitting hairs so fine, nobody could determine hate from passion from love from guilt from natural born killer
As with other crimes where motive or state of mind can lead to charges with stiffer penalties, it is determined by whether or not the prosecutor can convince a jury of your peers to find you guilty.
Unless it is proven that the gay man was targeted because he was gay. Then it is a hate crime. Same as if a victim is targeted for being black, or white, or asian, or whatever. Hate is hate.
Yay! More peeps saw my link to the Navajo Codetalker's obituary this time around. Still up there under the 'Military' category if anybody's interested.
/I linked to the tribal newspapers webite- more thorough write-up on his life.
Look. This is turning into some big nationalism thing, which is silly. The fact is we are 77% of Canada's export economy. Canada sure isn't 77% of our exports! We sure do buy your oil, and that's great. But it would be far more difficult for Canada to reconfigure its economy if we stopped trading. And if you mistakenly think I'm some Canada basher, you really ought to see my CD collection.
My point stands: no matter how many troops Canada loses, they are not the prime mover when it comes to international relations. They didn't invade Iraq, we did. They didn't invade Afghanistan, we did. For better or for worse. They can more easily speak out because of this. This is simple logic.
You compared Canada to the US, saying Canada can speak more forcefully on these matters. I said why that is, and then you blew up at me.
I agree. If it could be shown that today people of Irish descent are more likely to be a victim of an attack then it would make sense that Irish-ness be added to a list of possible targets of hate crimes.
For example, take this article: Hate Crimes Against Gays and Lesbians Rising in US I can't vouch for the research described in that article - it's not a subject about which I keep studied... but I picked it because there is reason to believe that certain groups in society are victimized more than others, in personal violence.
I believe that "hate" crimes legislation is intended to address this social phenomenon, and not to diminish the nature of punishing equivalent crimes in general.
In a lot of cases there's evidence, for example anti-Semitic literature in the home of the guy who shot the guard at the Holocaust Memorial or whatever it was.
Yeah...but the fucker's in his 80s- where's the deterrent in that?
/I understand the rationale, but that's not the best example.
That 'laundry list' is not based on money or something, it's based on which groups are actually systematically discriminated against and persecuted. that's why the Irish are not on it, although way back, when they were considered colored (not a coincidence) they would have been.
Believe it or not, there are people who still discriminate against the Irish - and just about any other group you'd care to name or even invent for yourself. If motivation is the problem, then having special legislation protecting against crimes motivated by any sort of enumerated characteristics inevitably discriminates against those not on the list, even though the underlying motivation is precisely identical with the sole exception of the particular group involved.
If I get beaten to a pulp for being Irish, that's presumably every bit as much a hate crime as being beaten to a pulp because I'm gay. But there's no special protection for the Irish on the books, so I'd be out of luck pursuing such charges against my attacker. And if I manage to get such legislation passed, it doesn't do any good if, on another occasion, I get beaten to a pulp because of my Scottish heritage. Or later on, my German heritage. And so on.
.
If it can be proven that you were a victim because of your ethnicity, it can be prosecuted as a hate crime. The law doesn't specify specific ethnicities as covered.
how is that determined?...if you mug someone and kill them, how would the perp know his victim was gay?...and if he did, you'd consider it terrorism...not going for it
It is a problem I have with hate crime legislation: suppose a gang member kills another gang me´mber of a drug deal gone bad. One member is black, the other white or chicano.
Is that gang violence, drug violence or a hate crime? The racial/social motivation should play a role in the sentencing, but not in the definition of the crime itself.
Burning a cross in a yard can be seen within existing legislation not only as vandalism and endangerment, but with threatening violence. Serious enough crimes in themselves.
Doesn't the bill specify hate crimes as being against color, race, religion, and/or sexual persuasion? It isn't specifically/only to protect homosexuals, that I remember.
In a lot of cases there's evidence, for example anti-Semitic literature in the home of the guy who shot the guard at the Holocaust Memorial or whatever it was.
so what?...a guy is sentenced for beating up a Jew...another guy gets a stiffer sentence for beating up a Jew because he has anti-Semetic literature?...I don't get it...give them both the stiffer sentence...problem solved and all the dickin around with who hates who is no longer an issue
Look. This is turning into some big nationalism thing, which is silly. The fact is we are 77% of Canada's export economy. Canada sure isn't 77% of our exports! We sure do buy your oil, and that's great. But it would be far more difficult for Canada to reconfigure its economy if we stopped trading. And if you mistakenly think I'm some Canada basher, you really ought to see my CD collection.
My point stands: no matter how many troops Canada loses, they are not the prime mover when it comes to international relations. They didn't invade Iraq, we did. They didn't invade Afghanistan, we did. For better or for worse. They can more easily speak out because of this. This is simple logic.
You compared Canada to the US, saying Canada can speak more forcefully on these matters. I said why that is, and then you blew up at me.
Another point: Canada is still going to sell that oil into the world market, unless they're interested in cratering their own economy. Which means we're going to wind up buying it anyway, perhaps with a tiny markup because of a slightly longer route, through some secondary dealer. It's a global marketplace; there's really no effective way for any supplier to "shut off" their supply of oil to one particular country, or region, without a complete cessation of production that deprives the entire world of their supply - and deprives that country of it's entire oil revenue.
'Nationalism' has nothing to do with it. American born and raised and US Army Vet.
Canada's been punching above it's weight in Afghanistan and I don't care if it's Fox news or the White House...I'm not going to keep quiet when somebody wants to crap all over an ally that's been contributing tangibly to our military in that part of the world.
As with other crimes where motive or state of mind can lead to charges with stiffer penalties, it is determined by whether or not the prosecutor can convince a jury of your peers to find you guilty.
The legislation will extend important protections to victims of violent hate crimes committed based on a person's actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender, gender identity and/or disability. It also strengthens existing hate crimes protections for a variety of other categories, including race, color, religion, national origin and ethnicity.
You're hearing a lot about the sexual orientation aspect of the bill because the gay rights groups (correctly) consider it a major victory, and the wingnuts are focusing on that aspect, hysterically claiming that it's about 'special rights' for gay people. It is not.
It's a recognition that certain groups are targeted for hate crimes. Not all are. In the 19th century the Irish would have been included in such legislation. (and the early 20th, I think). In the 21st century, they don't need to be.
Your point was basically 'Canada has no legs to stand on' and should be seen and not heard because they don't have superpower status. Harper and Sarkozy are using the tone regarding the mullahs, the post-election crackdown and the nuclear program that I would've preferred the White House used...(Y'know- 'shooting unarmed demonstrators stuck in traffic bad'). But hey...let's shift the argument from what Canada and France have to say re: Iran and the mullahs to 'well- they aren't superpowers, so fuck 'em'.
Yet...I'm sure you were singing a different tune when Chretien or Chirac were in opposition to the Iraq war.
I was against invading Iraq from the beginning, period. I remain opposed to it. So? That doesn't mean I'm blind to the realpolitik of conseqences being different for different countries when they make strong statements condemning other nations. Whose problem is Iran? Is Iran more our problem, or is it more Canada's problem?
It's not that they have NO leg to stand on, they just have shorter legs. Their circumstances are different. I'm not saying "fuck 'em" I'm saying simply that you are comparing apples to oranges when you compare Canada's tone to the US.
Doesn't the bill specify hate crimes as being against color, race, religion, and/or sexual persuasion? It isn't specifically/only to protect homosexuals, that I remember.
It's an addition to hate crime legislation already in place dealing with race, ethnicity, and religion.
If it can be proven that you were a victim because of your ethnicity, it can be prosecuted as a hate crime. The law doesn't specify specific ethnicities as covered.
My point still stands, though, because I can easily construct groups - like homosexuals, for example - that aren't ethnic. And from there, I can construct groups that aren't defined by sexual orientation, or by any other enumerated factor. The end result is always discrimination against those not on the list, because they are offered unequal protection under the law.
Better to craft the law so it applies to all rather than some.
'Nationalism' has nothing to do with it. American born and raised and US Army Vet.
Canada's been punching above it's weight in Afghanistan and I don't care if it's Fox news or the White House...I'm not going to keep quiet when somebody wants to crap all over an ally that's been contributing tangibly to our military in that part of the world.
Jesus Krypton. Where did I ever disparage Canada's contributions? You're answering arguments I'm not making, you're replying to questions I have not asked.
I'm not crapping over anyone, I'm stating a simple fact, that their circumstances are not the same asours, and their responsibilities with respect to international relations are not as great as ours as a nation.
You're hearing a lot about the sexual orientation aspect of the bill because the gay rights groups (correctly) consider it a major victory, and the wingnuts are focusing on that aspect, hysterically claiming that it's about 'special rights' for gay people. It is not.
It's a recognition that certain groups are targeted for hate crimes. Not all are. In the 19th century the Irish would have been included in such legislation. (and the early 20th, I think). In the 21st century, they don't need to be.
If you can show that another marker such as ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation is a cause for systematic persecution, go ahead and lobby to get it added to the bill.
Doesn't the bill specify hate crimes as being against color, race, religion, and/or sexual persuasion? It isn't specifically/only to protect homosexuals, that I remember.
Yes, sorry, hadn't seen your comment before I answered that.
CNN has a special section devoted to answering questions, concerns, etc. (geared for the United States...) here's the link... Sanja Gupta has repeatedly stated how imperative it is for children (especially young children) to get the vaccination...(here in Canada there have already been a number of children who have died -- one was a hockey player, in top physical health, etc.)
Do you have a link for Canadian children's disease stats? My son lives in Canada.
It is a problem I have with hate crime legislation: suppose a gang member kills another gang me´mber of a drug deal gone bad. One member is black, the other white or chicano.
Is that gang violence, drug violence or a hate crime? The racial/social motivation should play a role in the sentencing, but not in the definition of the crime itself.
Burning a cross in a yard can be seen within existing legislation not only as vandalism and endangerment, but with threatening violence. Serious enough crimes in themselves.
why not cut to the chase and recognize the hate element in all these crimes and mete out the harshest sentence possible...what's the problem with that?
Thanks, and I read iceweasel's last, also. That's what I thought. I'd read links about it in the past day or so from so many places, I wondered if I'd missed a key piece of information.
The problem is that it's not about the 'hate element', it's about a certain hate, namely, the (eliminationist) hatred of a group due to a non significant marker. But that's too long, so people say 'hate crime'.
My point still stands, though, because I can easily construct groups - like homosexuals, for example - that aren't ethnic. And from there, I can construct groups that aren't defined by sexual orientation, or by any other enumerated factor. The end result is always discrimination against those not on the list, because they are offered unequal protection under the law.
That is false. Victims of assault aren't any less protected under the law simply because we recognise that some assaults also fall afoul of another law.
You do realize that "hate crime" is an established phrase meaning a certain thing? This in no way means that other crimes are not motivated by hate.
I do and I disagree with the intention...maybe I should be more clear...all felons deserve the harshest penalty when violence is involved, and imo the sentences are too light...we need more prisons, not lighter sentences
Pretend you are a criminal. You are going to commit violence against someone. Would this law sway you against your planned act?
Or does the law simply deal with punishment?
It's well known that the death penalty isn't a deterrent, but proponents of it would argue it's not purely about punishment, but about justice.
Suppose we established that laws were never a deterrent, ever. That wouldn't mean the best society should dispense with them, or that they aren't needed. Laws exist as much for the law abiding members of a society as they do for the ones who break them-- perhaps even more so.
And I don't mean to pile on, but I really hate this oversimplifying quantitative approach. You don't think that maybe, some penalties are too harsh whereas others are too easy? Just punish everyone harder, is that the idea?
And I don't mean to pile on, but I really hate this oversimplifying quantitative approach. You don't think that maybe, some penalties are too harsh whereas others are too easy? Just punish everyone harder, is that the idea?
no, punish violent criminals harder...where do you get this stuff?
Ok, I see you specified violent in your comment. You know, this always moves so fast! Is there something else I misrepresented? Still the point stands: punish every violent offender harder? What's wrong with distinguishing between different cases?
Ok, I see you specified violent in your comment. You know, this always moves so fast! Is there something else I misrepresented? Still the point stands: punish every violent offender harder? What's wrong with distinguishing between different cases?
And different classes of victim? We punish the rape of a child differently than we do the rape of an adult.
My computer went on the blink there -- anyway, there was a Survey back in 2002 to determine who was and was not vaccinated in Canada. It was a national survey...(the number of children going un-vaccinated is increasing.)
Here's one link ..somewhat old, on Pertussis -- Vaccine preventable disease..
Another problem, btw, is that if they're in Ontario, then in order to have the children enter school, vaccinations are mandatory...have to have the proof of your child's vaccinations in order to enter public schools or daycares.
Here's another Health Canada report -- on the benefits of vaccinations and the incidence of preventable disease (pre and post vaccination records..) link here..
All year long you people manufactured this crap, and one night a year you've got to listen to it! -- Frank introducing "psychedelic music" to the audience of the National Academy of Recording Arts & Science dinner in New York (1968) at which the Mothers were invited to play