Nontroversy of the Weekend

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Blogosphere • Sun Nov 15, 2009 at 10:50 am PST • Views: 311

On his first visit to Japan, one of America’s most valued allies, President Obama greets Emperor Akihito with a traditional bow and the right wing blogosphere completely loses it.

Some of this stuff is blatantly racist too.

A commenter at Hot Air gives his perspective:

Someone needs to give this half white half wit a swift kick in his boney black ass and remind him that Americans, especially Presidents of the United States, bow to no man, woman or beast!

A common theme among all this outraged ranting is that US Presidents must never bow to a foreign leader. Bloggers all over the country are utterly convinced of it, as if they learned this fine point of Presidential etiquette right after the Pledge of Allegiance in Civics 101.

Oddly enough, I don’t recall ever hearing this universal truism before Barack Obama was elected President. Where’s this rule written down? I searched for quite a while during the last stupid “Bowgate” nontroversy, and couldn’t find it anywhere. Here’s the State Department’s Office of the Chief of Protocol web page; maybe you’ll have better luck. I think it’s a right wing urban legend.

I have to wonder if Obama was deliberately yanking the right’s chain; he must have known they’d freak out, after all of the silliness over his bow to Saudi King Abdullah.

Advertisement

729 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 Long Nics are Looonnng  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:52:11am

Don't care at all about this. Nontroversy is right!

2 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:53:36am

All in all I think we have a pretty good relationship w/Japan today considering our pasts... I hope it stays that way.

3 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:53:50am
I have to wonder if Obama was deliberately yanking the right’s chain; he must have known they’d freak out, after all of the silliness over his bow to Saudi King Abdullah.

Actually, I rather hope not as that gives these morons too much credit. I hope he was merely being a good guest, and that he knows he not do anything but wake up in the morning to piss off the kookosphere.

4 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:53:54am

Bow(frickin')Wow.

5 carefulnow  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:54:01am

I'd prefer a bow over a barf.

6 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:54:42am

I'll say again that "the bow" is completely in opposition to any theories about Obama being a narcissist. (Unless he's one of those super clever narcisssists who is being tricksy by just pretending to be polite to his hosts).

7 SixDegrees  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:55:14am

I've never heard of such a "rule," either, prior to this Administration. I've looked, found nothing, and believe it's total bullshit.

I'll note, too, that the Emperor is visibly shaking hands with the President of the United States, which I guess must mean that the nation of Japan will soon collapse into a smoking hole in the ocean.

8 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:56:18am

Some people need to just step back and get a grip. Jeez.

9 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:56:22am

At least he didn't puke on the carpet.

10 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:56:44am

re: #9 Cato the Elder

At least he didn't puke on the carpet.

Or the PM.

11 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:56:59am

re: #6 jaunte

I'll say again that "the bow" is completely in opposition to any theories about Obama being a narcissist. (Unless he's one of those super clever narcisssists who is being tricksy by just pretending to be polite to his hosts).

Hmmm.

12 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:57:14am

re: #9 Cato the Elder

At least he didn't puke on the carpet.

"If you blew sushi like I blew sushi..."

13 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:57:45am

re: #6 jaunte

(Unless he's one of those super clever narcisssists who is being tricksy by just pretending to be polite to his hosts).

Those do exist, but I'm not sure Obama is one of them.

14 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:57:58am

Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!". Then he'd have marched straight out the room again (after figuring out where the door was, of course)

15 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:57:59am

Without any audio, I'm thinking Obama may be saying, "Dude, I'm digging those shoes."

16 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:58:17am

re: #12 solomonpanting

"If you blew sushi like I blew sushi..."

/perhaps O will try the blowfish.

17 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:59:08am

re: #13 Sharmuta

At least there's still room for nontroversy.

18 Conservative Moonbat  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:59:18am

He's taking secret instructions from George Clinton

19 _RememberTonyC  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:59:36am

Am I an ODS sufferer if I say I have no problem with the POTUS bowing to a man like Akihito, but have a big problem with him bowing to a scumbag like the king of saudi arabia?

20 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:59:39am

My hero SEK at Lawyers, Guns and Money uncovered a series of photos of Eisenhower bowing, and has this snark to impart:

Seems someone forgot to tell Ike what everyone on the right knows (but oddly never cites a source for): the President never ever bows. Because as even a cursory search of the AP Image archive indicates, the man could not stop bowing.

By their logic, I believe that last bow means we have all been French since 2 September 1959. Eisenhower clearly demonstrated by that bow that the American President is a subordinate of the French, which means that for the past 50 years America has been a French territory with pretensions of sovereignty. Mon Dieu!

21 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:59:50am
"Americans [...] bow to no man, woman or beast!"

Someone should have told that to Ben Franklin before he went to France.

22 Mark Pennington  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:02:02am

Impeach him!

I can't read HA anymore. I used to out of morbid curiosity but lately it's just sickening and beyond the pale.

23 bratwurst  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:02:23am

re: #19 _RememberTonyC

Am I an ODS sufferer if I say I have no problem with the POTUS bowing to a man like Akihito, but have a big problem with him bowing to a scumbag like the king of saudi arabia?

I owe you an apology. After discussing this non-issue in two consecutive threads and having several Newcastle Browns down my neck, I jumped to a conclusion when you brought it up yesterday.

24 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:02:38am

Like I wrote before, getting cranky at this, is the people who make the stereotype of the ugly American, perpetuating the stereotype of the ugly American.

How can anyone think that it is somehow better to be jingoistic, vile and ignorant than actually being minimally repectful of the fact that other nations of other protocols and traditions?

25 Long Nics are Looonnng  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:03:07am

re: #21 Cato the Elder

Someone should have told that to Ben Franklin before he went to France.

I always found it cool that a guy who looked like that got sooo much poon.

26 _RememberTonyC  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:03:44am

re: #23 bratwurst

I owe you an apology. After discussing this non-issue in two consecutive threads and having several Newcastle Browns down my neck, I jumped to a conclusion when you brought it up yesterday.

apology accepted, bro ... thanks for being a class act.

27 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:04:33am

re: #24 ludwigvanquixote

Like I wrote before, getting cranky at this, is the people who make the stereotype of the ugly American, perpetuating the stereotype of the ugly American.

How can anyone think that it is somehow better to be jingoistic, vile and ignorant than actually being minimally repectful of the fact that other nations of other protocols and traditions?

I guess stereotyping people as Ugly Americans is okay if their last name is Bush.

28 Long Nics are Looonnng  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:05:46am

Well, that was pretty open too... Some crappy defense today...

29 ggt  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:06:11am

When in Rome?

30 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:06:16am

re: #27 Sharmuta

I guess stereotyping people as Ugly Americans is okay if their last name is Bush.

Well there is a great example of that...

31 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:06:51am

re: #24 ludwigvanquixote

PIMF

Like I wrote before, getting cranky at this, is the people who make the stereotype of the ugly American, perpetuating the stereotype of the ugly American.

How can anyone think that it is somehow better to be jingoistic, vile and ignorant than actually being minimally repectful of the fact that other nations of other protocols and traditions exist?

32 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:06:51am

I pulled up the Google "Bush Bows" in images...

re: #20 iceweasel


Just for fun.

33 ggt  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:06:59am

Hey all,

I'm multi-tasking and can't keep up.

Life, once again, is interfering with my LGF time.

What to do?

Have a great afternoon!

34 _RememberTonyC  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:08:01am

re: #33 ggt

Hey all,

I'm multi-tasking and can't keep up.

Life, once again, is interfering with my LGF time.

What to do?

Have a great afternoon!


later ggt

35 HelloDare  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:08:23am

The NYT's take on Bill Clinton's apparently shallower bow to the same guy.

It wasn't a bow, exactly. But Mr. Clinton came close. He inclined his head and shoulders forward, he pressed his hands together. It lasted no longer than a snapshot, but the image on the South Lawn was indelible: an obsequent President, and the Emperor of Japan.

..."It was not a bow-bow, if you know what I mean," said Ambassador Molly Raiser, the chief of protocol.

White House officials described Mr. Clinton's tilt as something of an improvisation. Because Emperor Akihito broke with tradition in turn to raise his glass at the state dinner, some even said Mr. Clinton had managed something of a breakthrough.

36 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:09:03am

re: #19 _RememberTonyC

Am I an ODS sufferer if I say I have no problem with the POTUS bowing to a man like Akihito, but have a big problem with him bowing to a scumbag like the king of saudi arabia?

What if they held hands?

37 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:09:17am

re: #30 ludwigvanquixote

That's not a justification for stereotyping a president as an Ugly American.

38 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:11:06am

This is so great

As the comedian Yakoff Smirnoff used to say

"What a country!"

Wasn't it just several months ago that many were insisting Obama DIDN'T bow to someone, and now we have people insisting that it's OKAY to bow

Me, I'm of the respectful "When In Rome" school. As a visitor I follow the customs of my hosts!

39 golgoth  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:11:40am

A very simple word: Respect.

That is what Obama is doing, that is what needs to be done, and that is what has happened. If he had not bowed, then it would have been rude and bad for American foreign policy.

40 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:12:31am

re: #32 Rightwingconspirator

I pulled up the Google "Bush Bows" in images...

Just for fun.

I really don't understand how the rage machine thinks. It's not as if there were a shortage of legitimate criticisms to be making of Obama. Instead they waste their time on these bizarre manufactured fauxrages. Why?

41 lostlakehiker  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:12:37am

There's bowing, and there's bowing and scraping. Bowing is fine. I saw no bowing and scraping. There are enough real things to complain about: the U.S. dollar is circling the drain. The government proposes to run the health system, bringing to it the legendary efficiency of the post office and the DMV. We can't seem to actually get any oil drilling going, any big wind farms permitted, or any nuclear power plants for that matter. The nation cannot run on hot air and empty promises forever.

A bow to our superiors (in foresight and industry) is prudent.

42 _RememberTonyC  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:13:11am

re: #36 recusancy

What if they held hands?

That was Dubya, of course. I hated seeing that too.

43 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:13:56am

CNN's State of Union did a blip on this today. The suggestion was that it's a symbolic gesture, and that it was well prepared for, in advance. One person noted something that Mitt Romney had said...(don't have the quote). Basically it's to prepare America for its decline as "super-power" in the world...(again, in opposition to Bush policy of unilateralism, etc.) Now it's all about America being, say, a "partner" (perhaps a junior one) to the Great Nation States of China, Japan, India, etc. It's all about multilateralism, and foregoing the U.S. supremacist notions. That's the symbolism of bowing to other world leaders -- whether it's to a Saudi King or to a Japanese emperor.

44 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:14:00am

re: #37 Sharmuta

That's not a justification for stereotyping a president as an Ugly American.

There's no justification for giving an unsolicited back rub to the German Chancellor like you are some sexist fool copping a feel on your secretary either.

You were the one who brought up Bush in the first place. If your really want to get into how ignorant and embarrassing that man was as a president I am game.

45 golgoth  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:14:00am

re: #19 _RememberTonyC

As bad as the Al-saud family is, abdallah is one of the better ones to be working with.

46 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:14:05am

re: #14 Jimmah

Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!". Then he'd have marched straight out the room again (after figuring out where the door was, of course)

I don't think so. Barbara would have died of embarassment.

As I said up a couple threads, there's at least one crazy website that went ape because George and Laura were photographed worshipping demons at a Shinto shrine.

47 dugmartsch  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:14:32am

re: #27 Sharmuta

I guess stereotyping people as Ugly Americans is okay if their last name is Bush.

There are some stereotypes i like and some stereotypes i don't like.

/

48 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:15:28am

re: #19 _RememberTonyC

Am I an ODS sufferer if I say I have no problem with the POTUS bowing to a man like Akihito, but have a big problem with him bowing to a scumbag like the king of saudi arabia?

No. That's kind of where I am too, and I voted for the guy. The bowing thing in Saudi was ridiculously blown up, though.

49 Conservative Moonbat  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:15:36am

Tea Partiers Heckle Gore Speech

BOCA RATON - Former Vice President Al Gore's global-warming speech Saturday night at Mizner Park drew about a thousand attendees, as well as more than 200 loud protesters.


"This is the most dangerous crisis we've ever faced," Gore said of climate change. He spoke over a chorus of boos from protesters, who were monitored by at least a dozen uniformed city police officers.

Many of the protesters were with the groups Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow and South Florida Tea Party, the latter of which feels that Gore's views will eventually lead to increased taxes and flawed business legislation.

50 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:16:30am

re: #20 iceweasel

My hero SEK at Lawyers, Guns and Money uncovered a series of photos of Eisenhower bowing, and has this snark to impart:

The Dwight D. Eisenhower Bowing Hour. I love it.

51 _RememberTonyC  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:16:49am

re: #45 golgoth

As bad as the Al-saud family is, abdallah is one of the better ones to be working with.

maybe so, but he deserves only the most superficial of respectful gestures. a handshake would have been OK. and a bow would have even been OK if it was a mutual gesture done by both men.

52 Conservative Moonbat  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:16:54am

re: #49 Conservative Moonbat

sorry for going OT so early, that just caught my eye and pissed me off a bit.
Tea partiers can't let a former VP deliver a speech in peace.

53 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:17:08am

re: #44 ludwigvanquixote

There's no justification for giving an unsolicited back rub to the German Chancellor like you are some sexist fool copping a feel on your secretary either.

You were the one who brought up Bush in the first place. If your really want to get into how ignorant and embarrassing that man was as a president I am game.

No- I wasn't the one who "brought up Bush in the first place". Why we're discussing Bush when he's not the President involved is beyond me.

And while it may have been inappropriate, the shoulder rub from President Bush was meant as a friendly gesture, I'm sure. Not one of violence like some people's fantasies.

54 The Hoopster  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:17:19am

Satt: you still here? You said Moss has lost a step...
When the Pats were checking out Moss they send a scout down to Florida to Time him..I have a very good source that timed him at 4.27/40..
They signed him immediately.. During the famous 2007 F-You season he ran past every stud CB in the league...
unfortunately Neither rookie for the Colts has busted a 4.4..
Moss is fast..really fast.. I see problems tonight...

55 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:17:36am

re: #25 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I always found it cool that a guy who looked like that got sooo much poon.

He was adorable. And tres intellectuel.

He also really liked women, which helps.

56 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:17:39am
I have to wonder if Obama was deliberately yanking the right’s chain; he must have known they’d freak out, after all of the silliness over his bow to Saudi King Abdullah.

Bingo!

Terror trails, Gitmo, Afghanistan, Health Care, Unemployment, the Economy. We need a good non-controversy and this is it.

Sheep are so easily fooled.

57 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:17:57am

I think it is more of personal, physical tic. He's pretty tall and lanky, he just bends down low at the waist. When I first saw the Saudi one, I thought "That's actually not that easy for everybody to do, bend in half like that."

58 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:18:07am

re: #44 ludwigvanquixote

"...some sexist fool copping a feel..."

Are you serious?

59 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:18:13am

And, it's another reason why Obama was openly (perhaps deliberately?) seen with Fareed Zakaria's book, "The Post American World." That's the new reality. (prehaps better in some respects.)

60 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:18:37am

re: #46 SanFranciscoZionist

I don't think so. Barbara would have died of embarassment.

As I said up a couple threads, there's at least one crazy website that went ape because George and Laura were photographed worshipping demons at a Shinto shrine.

In contrast to so many wingnut fantasies, Bush, for all his faults did, just like Obama, appreciate the need for politeness and respect in diplomacy (well - usually).

61 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:19:00am

re: #38 sattv4u2

This is so great

As the comedian Yakoff Smirnoff used to say

"What a country!"

Wasn't it just several months ago that many were insisting Obama DIDN'T bow to someone, and now we have people insisting that it's OKAY to bow

Me, I'm of the respectful "When In Rome" school. As a visitor I follow the customs of my hosts!

Different situations, different cultural patterns.

62 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:19:02am

re: #58 rwmofo

"...some sexist fool copping a feel..."

Are you serious?


He confused Bush with WJC.

63 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:19:48am

re: #54 HoosierHoops

Satt: you still here? You said Moss has lost a step...
When the Pats were checking out Moss they send a scout down to Florida to Time him..I have a very good source that timed him at 4.27/40..They signed him immediately.. During the famous 2007 F-You season he ran past every stud CB in the league...
unfortunately Neither rookie for the Colts has busted a 4.4..
Moss is fast..really fast.. I see problems tonight...

Thanks. Never saw that reported. I was going by an interview he did with a Boston paper his 1st pre-season with the team and it was his words that he had lost a step but thoughthe made up for it by being technically better

GO PATS !

64 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:19:50am

re: #55 SanFranciscoZionist

You are absolutely right!

65 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:19:54am

re: #62 solomonpanting

He confused Bush with WJC.

Hahahahahahahaha!

66 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:20:09am

re: #58 rwmofo

"...some sexist fool copping a feel..."

Are you serious?

Sadly, he is!

67 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:20:50am

re: #53 Sharmuta

No- I wasn't the one who "brought up Bush in the first place". Why we're discussing Bush when he's not the President involved is beyond me.

And while it may have been inappropriate, the shoulder rub from President Bush was meant as a friendly gesture, I'm sure. Not one of violence like some people's fantasies.

Sharm, I said ugly American, you said Bush.

Unfortunately, I agree with you.

As to friendly gestures, in what universe is it ok to saunter up behind a woman you are not very friendly with in the first place and do that?

Would you be cool with your boss doing that to you?

What if he weren't your boss, what if you were the leader of a major Western Nation?

Would that be perhaps a little degrading to your position as a leader and not just you as a woman.

The entire stereotype of the ugly American is an utter tone deafness to the sensitivites of others from other nations. There really could not be a better image of it that W, doing that with Merckel.

And BTW, take a look at her face. How did she respond to it?

68 _RememberTonyC  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:21:20am

re: #63 sattv4u2

Thanks. Never saw that reported. I was going by an interview he did with a Boston paper his 1st pre-season with the team and it was his words that he had lost a step but thoughthe made up for it by being technically better

GO PATS !

you know tonight's a huge game when i already told my wife we won't be watching Curb Your Enthusiasm, Desperate Housewives, and Californication together.

69 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:21:30am

re: #60 Xxxmah

In contrast to so many wingnut fantasies, Bush, for all his faults did, just like Obama, appreciate the need for politeness and respect in diplomacy (well - usually).

You mean unlike moonbat fantasies of Bush punching world leaders in the face?

70 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:22:09am

re: #67 ludwigvanquixote

What about GWB's nicknames for everybody? Mean or not?

71 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:22:24am

re: #69 Sharmuta

lol...like that triple x thingy going on there...

72 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:22:29am

F the loony right wing.

My only issue is if he is going to be culturally sensitive he ought to be culturally sensitive and the bow as he performed it in Japan is neither appropriate nor does it convey respectful partnership. In fact, it is jarring for many Japanese to see him do this as the US still needs to be a strong power in the region for the sake of the Japanese themselves.

On those grounds it is critique worthy.

73 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:23:10am

re: #67 ludwigvanquixote

This isn't about Bush.

74 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:23:15am

re: #58 rwmofo

"...some sexist fool copping a feel..."

Are you serious?

Did you notice the lady's response? Yes I am serious.

75 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:23:31am

re: #72 tokyobk

the U.S. is junior partner in Asia...(obviousy).

76 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:23:46am

Did W get a BJ from an intern in the oval office?

77 idioma  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:23:55am

THis is why we can't have nice things.

78 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:24:06am

re: #37 Sharmuta

That's not a justification for stereotyping a president as an Ugly American.

No, but telling the entire world that they are either with us or with the terrorists is the essence of historical bullying brand of Ugly Americanism. Bush didn't so much try to persuade the world to our side as he threatened them with a false dichotomy based false association with terrorists if they didn't kowtow to his demand.

79 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:24:38am

re: #74 ludwigvanquixote

Did you notice the lady's response? Yes I am serious.

I saw two leaders who were friends clowning around in front of the cameras.

80 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:24:40am

re: #77 idioma

THis is why we can't have nice things threads.

:(

81 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:25:17am

re: #67 ludwigvanquixote

saunter up behind a woman you are not very friendly with in the first place and do that?

Yeah ,, because at that time they were TOTAL strangers,,, never heard of each other ,, never worked together on world events
AND ,,, what your "video" (3 second clip) does NOT show is the aftermath
What do you think happened?
A) Merkel stands up and throws a glass of water in his face
B) Merkel stands up, goes over to him and they start talking

82 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:25:30am

the one item that was definitely Off The Table, with respect to China, was Obama bringing up any thing with regard to "human rights." That's a no-no...(especially when China is America's biggest banker.)

83 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:25:51am

re: #79 rwmofo

I saw two leaders who were friends clowning around in front of the cameras.

Really? I think Bush meant well with the backrub, but I see no indication that Merkel expected it or was amused. Is there any source to suggest she was OK with it?

84 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:26:03am

re: #57 prairiefire

I think it is more of personal, physical tic. He's pretty tall and lanky, he just bends down low at the waist. When I first saw the Saudi one, I thought "That's actually not that easy for everybody to do, bend in half like that."

I kind of agree with you. When you tower over the person you're shaking hands with, you just about have to bend a bit. Add to that what appears to be Obama's attempt at a traditional Japanese bow, and the result is ... what's in the photo.

85 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:26:05am

re: #78 goddamnedfrank

No, but telling the entire world that they are either with us or with the terrorists is the essence of historical bullying brand of Ugly Americanism.

Because the terrorists have so much to proud of?

86 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:26:51am

re: #85 solomonpanting

to be proud of

87 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:27:01am

re: #84 reine.de.tout

No, no, no, Obama was obviously picking something up off the floor.
/

88 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:27:02am

re: #85 solomonpanting

Because the terrorists have so much to proud of?

How did we get to that?

89 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:27:37am

re: #76 Racer X

Did W get a BJ from an intern in the oval office?

ZING!

Later, Lizards.

90 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:27:41am

re: #88 SanFranciscoZionist

How did we get to that?

9-11

91 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:27:53am

re: #87 J.S.

No, no, no, Obama was obviously picking something up off the floor.
/

"Nice shoes, Emp. Are those Thom McCanns?"

92 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:27:55am

Obama is surrounded by fools. His cabinet is full of tax cheats. He cannot even get a decent health care bill passed - even though Democrats control congress. He promised us unemployment would go down and it has not. He has no clue about Iraq or Afghanistan. Now he wants to bring a dog and pony show to NY with these terror trials.

What if the lawyers get KSM off on a technicality? Very likely. The OJ trial will look like traffic school.

Obama is way out of his league.

Can you say ONE TERM?

93 BSM ENGINEER  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:00am

My father fought on Saipan. He was so angered by the bow of an American President to an Emperor of a the country he fought against, he stopped speaking and went to bed.

When The President goes overseas he represents America. The argument that this is just a tradition does not square with me. We do not grovel at the feet of our betters as those in totalitarian regimes do, as is their "tradition"! We are the US! I fought in two wars to free others from "deference" to others that was unwarranted. This is a spit in the eye to those of us who believe that all are equal and saw our brothers die to prove it.

Damn.

94 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:00am

re: #74 ludwigvanquixote

Did you notice the lady's response? Yes I am serious.

Of course you're serious, and of course you're 100% correct. It's amazing to me that the kneejerk Bush worship goes so deep that people are reluctant even to admit he did anything wrong here.

Nothing wrong with admitting it was a gaffe, folks.

95 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:16am

re: #90 solomonpanting

Oh, don't worry, they're all honorary Americans now...

96 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:17am

re: #83 SanFranciscoZionist

Really? I think Bush meant well with the backrub, but I see no indication that Merkel expected it or was amused. Is there any source to suggest she was OK with it?

Looked like she was smiling after she looked to her left. Did she ever complain about it? File this one under "Nontroversy" as well.

97 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:26am

re: #87 J.S.

No, no, no, Obama was obviously picking something up off the floor.
/

/his approval rating perhaps?

98 ferris  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:27am
Oddly enough, I don’t recall ever hearing this universal truism before Barack Obama was elected President. Where’s this rule written down?

You could start with the NY Times (not known as a righ wing rag).

Flashback to Bill Clinton's almost, sort of, kinda bow...

But the "thou need not bow" commandment from the State Department's protocol office maintained a constancy of more than 200 years. Administration officials scurried to insist that the eager-to-please President had not really done the unthinkable.

"It was not a bow-bow, if you know what I mean," said Ambassador Molly Raiser, the chief of protocol.

White House officials described Mr. Clinton's tilt as something of an improvisation. Because Emperor Akihito broke with tradition in turn to raise his glass at the state dinner, some even said Mr. Clinton had managed something of a breakthrough.

"Presidents don't bow, and Emperors don't toast," one official said. "So this was a little bit like the cultures meeting each other halfway."

99 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:33am

re: #69 Sharmuta

You mean unlike moonbat fantasies of Bush punching world leaders in the face?

You just demonstrated your inability to understand the point of my comment altogether. Well done.

My comment as was made clear was couched entirely in terms of wingnut fantasies of 'strong leadership' equating to disrespecting world leaders. Yes of course Bush would never have done such a thing - for the most part he showed the appropriate respect to other leaders - as is proved by the abundance of pictures of him biwing etc - that is the point. See also my #60.

100 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:35am

As someone Obama's age, a bend like that would make me unleash gas of extreme velocity.

101 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:28:56am

re: #85 solomonpanting

Because the terrorists have so much to proud of?

No, because a persuasive leader should be able to make that point without resorting to issuing a polarizing and idiotic ultimatum.

102 Semper Fi  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:29:15am

Good morning, Lizards. I lurked all through the sky thread and loved every food idea. Hoping it would transition into desserts but that was not to be.

Yes, indeed, bowing in accordance with the custom of the country and in recognition to his office is fine with me but, please don't pray to his god or saints unless you're of similar faith. In that case, quiet respect should suffice.

103 ferris  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:29:24am

Sorry, I forgot the URL to that NY Times quote in my #98.

It's here.

104 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:29:53am

re: #76 Racer X

Did W get a BJ from an intern in the oval office?

I have no idea. If he did, he was at least smart enough to choose one who wouldn't talk.

As to politicians policing their peckers, neither party has a particular advantage. The only difference is that all the GOP goes on endlessly about it being a bad thing so when they get caught there is the spectacle of utter hypocrisy going down in flames.

I personally have never cared for this trend in American politics.

No one should really give a damn about what the politicians do behind closed doors with consenting partners.

The bottom line is that most of the leaders in history that people would hold up as heroes of one strip or another, got around. Most of the ones you would call horrible got around too. Of course there were some horrible ones who were completely faithful as well.

Jimmy Carter was faithful to his wife. George Washington was not.

I am not trying to excuse marital infidelity, but this is simply a non-issue.

What is an issue is making a public ass of yourself.

105 Bob Levin  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:29:53am

I really think we have to factor in a fear level in America right now. It's a real fear, and it's deep and powerful. It comes out in instances like this, but for so many folks here in the US, this is as close to a depression or deep recession as they've ever been--and hence a level of fear that is greater, than they've ever experienced. It's the fear that FDR talked about, the kind of fear that creates more fear. Both of my folks grew up in the Depression--and this fear is on a different geometric plane than just folks wanting to be petty.

There are folks who just want to be petty, spiteful, and small--and they rightfully need to be ridiculed. Both the pettiness and the deep fear look the same, but they aren't the same. As long as unemployment is high, as long as folks perceive the stimulus isn't working, and therefore no one is steering this ship, it's going to get worse.

106 SixDegrees  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:30:15am

re: #51 _RememberTonyC

maybe so, but he deserves only the most superficial of respectful gestures. a handshake would have been OK. and a bow would have even been OK if it was a mutual gesture done by both men.

Uh - both men bowed. So did the Empress, for that matter.

Both men shook hands, as well. Does this portend the collapse of Japan?

And why does the Emperor of Japan "deserve[s] only the most superficial of respectful gestures"? Would it be acceptable, when he visited here and was presented with the President's extended hand, to keep his own hands at his sides? Or to turn his back?

Remind me why this Emperor deserves the official, formal disrespect of the United States. I seem to have missed that memo.

107 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:30:15am

re: #79 rwmofo

I saw two leaders who were friends clowning around in front of the cameras.

Really?
I always thought she looked totally creeped out by handsy McCreepy.
But I might be wrong...maybe she was asking for it or they were just joking around.

108 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:30:29am

re: #79 rwmofo

I saw two leaders who were friends clowning around in front of the cameras.

What? Now you are kidding. Ladies, please help me out. Does her expression look pleased or happy?

109 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:31:13am

re: #90 solomonpanting

9-11

Don't be ridiculous. You can criticize foreign policy decisions Bush made without glorifying terrorism.

110 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:31:18am

re: #104 ludwigvanquixote

What is an issue is making a public ass of yourself.

Totally agree. I wish Obama would stop doing it.

111 Idle Drifter  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:31:58am

re: #100 Jeff In Ohio

Some do it at the most inopportune time.

112 Mark Pennington  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:32:06am

As long as he doesn't sniff someone's ass or lick them on the cheek I really don't think it's a big deal.

I'm going to go now and watch my Panther's probably lose another game. Have a nice day, Lizards!

113 SixDegrees  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:32:49am

re: #67 ludwigvanquixote

Sharm, I said ugly American, you said Bush.

Right. Because there's simply no such things as a brush that's too wide when it comes to insulting an entire continent.

114 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:32:49am

re: #110 Racer X

(frankly, looking at this from a foreign country, I'm embarrassed for Obama...just saying.)

115 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:32:50am

re: #108 ludwigvanquixote

What? Now you are kidding. Ladies, please help me out. Does her expression look pleased or happy?

Theres a reason your video cuts off after 5 seconds. It doesn't serve the Bush detractors to show more. See # 81

116 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:33:00am

re: #108 ludwigvanquixote

What? Now you are kidding. Ladies, please help me out. Does her expression look pleased or happy?

LVQ - honestly - I looked at the clip 4 times and it was so quick, and from a distance, I couldn't tell whether she looked upset or not, from her face.

The shoulder shrug might suggest that she was upset . . . but we can't hear what, if anything, she was saying, and we don't know what happened afterward (or before) - so it's just hard to tell.

117 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:33:05am

re: #94 iceweasel

Of course you're serious, and of course you're 100% correct. It's amazing to me that the kneejerk Bush worship goes so deep that people are reluctant even to admit he did anything wrong here.

Nothing wrong with admitting it was a gaffe, folks.

My suspicion is that Bush was in the habit of offering shoulder rubs to people on his staff, and went in for Merkel's back without thinking about it. She was clearly startled and not terribly pleased. End of story. I assume he apologized, and it was not a big deal.

118 _RememberTonyC  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:33:51am

re: #106 SixDegrees

Uh - both men bowed. So did the Empress, for that matter.

Both men shook hands, as well. Does this portend the collapse of Japan?

And why does the Emperor of Japan "deserve[s] only the most superficial of respectful gestures"? Would it be acceptable, when he visited here and was presented with the President's extended hand, to keep his own hands at his sides? Or to turn his back?

Remind me why this Emperor deserves the official, formal disrespect of the United States. I seem to have missed that memo.

you missed what I was saying ... i was fine with Obama and Akihito. I was saying abdullah of saudi arabia only deserved the most superficial of respectful gestures.

119 SixDegrees  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:33:57am

re: #108 ludwigvanquixote

What? Now you are kidding. Ladies, please help me out. Does her expression look pleased or happy?

I see - so this whole exercise is based on speculation, and perhaps mind reading, rather than fact.

That makes perfect sense.

120 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:34:51am

re: #117 SanFranciscoZionist

My suspicion is that Bush was in the habit of offering shoulder rubs to people on his staff, and went in for Merkel's back without thinking about it. She was clearly startled and not terribly pleased. End of story. I assume he apologized, and it was not a big deal.

Yes, that's exactly what I think as well.

121 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:34:57am

re: #116 reine.de.tout

what the "video" (5 second clip) does NOT show is the aftermath
What do you think happened?
A) Merkel stands up and throws a glass of water in his face
B) Merkel stands up, goes over to him and they start talking

I think theres a reason the posters of the video cut it off at that mark

122 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:35:03am

All public figures commit gaffes. Obama is no different. I know - hard to admit.

*smooch*

123 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:35:27am

re: #110 Racer X

Totally agree. I wish Obama would stop doing it.

Really, and exactly how has he done that?

Be fair.

It is not that I love Obama. It is that I don't have ODS.

Precisely which nontroversy about his bad behavior had any merit?

Was he scoping out Brazillian babes? no not really.

Did he bow too much? Was it more than any other president?

Is it his inability to make complete sentences like Palin or W?

Seriously, be fair.

124 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:35:34am

re: #93 BSM ENGINEER

My father fought on Saipan. He was so angered by the bow of an American President to an Emperor of a the country he fought against, he stopped speaking and went to bed.

My father was a Marine battalion scout and fought island to island in the Pacific Theater. He led one of the first patrols looking for hostiles in Nagasaki after they dropped the bomb. On board the USS Wichita in Nagasaki Harbor, he help repatriate POWs. He couldn't give a rats as if Obama bowed to the Emperor of the country he fought against.

Now, ask him about officers, and he'll give you an earful of the Lt. he wished he'd shot on Okinawa.

125 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:36:21am

The right-wing-blogs' response is almost Pavlovian with Matt Drudge playing the role of Ivan Pavlov and the image of Obama bowing in place of the food presented to Pavlov's dogs.

126 funky chicken  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:36:34am

The emperor is tiny, and appears delighted. Who cares?

Remember all the right wingers defending Trent Lott for his ridiculous praise of Strom Thurmond? "He's an old guy, and Trent made him happy. Who cares?"

Obama said before he was elected that he feels that America has a big problem with being viewed as arrogant by other nations. He has decided to address this issue.

I may disagree with his perception, but ... his willingness to bow when meeting the elderly figurehead emperor of Japan just doesn't upset me. I'm somewhat surprised that it upsets anybody, really.

127 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:37:12am

re: #123 ludwigvanquixote

Really, and exactly how has he done that?

Be fair.

It is not that I love Obama. It is that I don't have ODS.

Precisely which nontroversy about his bad behavior had any merit?

Was he scoping out Brazillian babes? no not really.

Did he bow too much? Was it more than any other president?

Is it his inability to make complete sentences like Palin or W?

Seriously, be fair.

Oh please. Are you seriously saying Obama has never committed a public gaffe? Never had a hard time finishing a sentence during a speech.? Really?

128 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:37:13am

re: #121 sattv4u2

what the "video" (5 second clip) does NOT show is the aftermath
What do you think happened?
A) Merkel stands up and throws a glass of water in his face
B) Merkel stands up, goes over to him and they start talking

I think theres a reason the posters of the video cut it off at that mark

Satt - I'm not going speculate on this, anymore than I want to speculate about whether she was happy or not, based on that short clip, without knowing what happened before, or after, or what she said.

129 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:37:59am

re: #110 Racer X

Totally agree. I wish Obama would stop doing it.

Stop doing what?
Being polite.
If there is one thing I have noticed is the good manners the President seems to have.

130 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:38:32am

re: #127 Racer X

Oh please. Are you seriously saying Obama has never committed a public gaffe? Never had a hard time finishing a sentence during a speech.? Really?

Of course he hasn't. Thats your ODS showing!

Barack Hussein Obama ,,, mmm,mmm,mmm!
//

131 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:38:36am

re: #123 ludwigvanquixote

Really, and exactly how has he done that?

Be fair.

It is not that I love Obama. It is that I don't have ODS.

Precisely which nontroversy about his bad behavior had any merit?

Was he scoping out Brazillian babes? no not really.

Did he bow too much? Was it more than any other president?

Is it his inability to make complete sentences like Palin or W?

Seriously, be fair.

What really hurts wingnuts about Obama is not that he is embarassing America in front of the world, but the exact opposite. There is in fact great respect and even affection for Obama all over the world, in stark contrast to Bush.

132 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:38:37am

re: #101 goddamnedfrank

No, because a persuasive leader should be able to make that point without resorting to issuing a polarizing and idiotic ultimatum.

You mean something along the lines of:

"My fellow world citizens. It has come to my attention that several foreign guests aboard several of our domestic airplanes may have inadvertently caused the pilots to severely veer off course and, unfortunately, miss their intended destinations. While I would refrain from jumping to any hasty conclusions, it is my extreme desire that anyone remotely interested in this unfortunate tragedy please afford us more consideration than our foreign guests while we conduct an investigation as to what may have led to the aforementioned events. Allah God Bless America this place."

133 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:39:04am

re: #20 iceweasel

My hero SEK at Lawyers, Guns and Money uncovered a series of photos of Eisenhower bowing, and has this snark to impart:

But that's different.

//

Here's Nixon doing a slight bow to Hirohito.

134 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:39:29am

re: #129 webevintage

Stop doing what?
Being polite.
If there is one thing I have noticed is the good manners the President seems to have.

Yes I particularly enjoy how he flips the middle finger to his opponents and pretends it is a nose scratch. Sly.

135 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:40:12am

re: #131 Jimmah

What really hurts wingnuts about Obama is not that he is embarassing America in front of the world, but the exact opposite. There is in fact great respect and even affection for Obama all over the world, in stark contrast to Bush.

Hahahahahahahahahahha!

*deep breath*

Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

136 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:40:33am

re: #81 sattv4u2

Tell you what, make the same move with a female co-worker who knows you, and see how well that holds up if she makes a complaint.

re: #119 SixDegrees

Ummm, if you read what I said, I had been commenting on how there are those who create and perpetuate the stereotype of the ugly American. Exactly where you get a whole continent from is your lack of comprehension, not my lack of writing.

re: #116 reine.de.tout

LVQ - honestly - I looked at the clip 4 times and it was so quick, and from a distance, I couldn't tell whether she looked upset or not, from her face.

The shoulder shrug might suggest that she was upset . . . but we can't hear what, if anything, she was saying, and we don't know what happened afterward (or before) - so it's just hard to tell.

Then look at her face again in this cut. I am rather surprised that her lifting her arms and pushing him off isn't a clue too.

137 funky chicken  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:40:48am

re: #82 J.S.

the one item that was definitely Off The Table, with respect to China, was Obama bringing up any thing with regard to "human rights." That's a no-no...(especially when China is America's biggest banker.)

Uh, yeah. And GW Bush was just all over the Chinese for that, and for the environmental problems, and the melamine poisoning of our pets, and , and , and.

And Bill Clinton's administration approved the sale of some rather high tech nuclear stuff and communication stuff to China and even Syria, as I recall.

Obama's not doing any worse than his predecessors. He's probably not doing any better either, but I'm not going to pretend like he's some kind of radical departure from our recent past.

138 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:41:28am

re: #108 ludwigvanquixote

A bit freaked. I have had this happen to me with fellow sales people who were men. I think my face looked exactly the same.

139 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:41:37am

re: #134 Racer X

Yes I particularly enjoy how he flips the middle finger to his opponents and pretends it is a nose scratch. Sly.

Seriously?
You really can't think that was what he was doing...I mean, oh come on...
Really?

140 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:41:40am

When you love a politician so deeply, so blindly, you are bound to be disappointed.

141 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:41:41am

re: #129 webevintage

Stop doing what?
Being polite.
If there is one thing I have noticed is the good manners the President seems to have.

A trait he appears to share with many of his predecessors in the Oval Office. It's a good one for a leader.

142 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:41:47am

re: #134 Racer X

Yes I particularly enjoy how he flips the middle finger to his opponents and pretends it is a nose scratch. Sly.

You mean like this?

143 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:42:09am

re: #127 Racer X

Oh please. Are you seriously saying Obama has never committed a public gaffe? Never had a hard time finishing a sentence during a speech.? Really?

No not at all. I am saying that he has never made a public ass of himself the way that the nontroversy types would like us to imagine. I am saying that as a public speaker he sails rings around many other politicians, like W and Palin to name two Biden for three.

144 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:42:27am

re: #138 prairiefire

A bit freaked. I have had this happen to me with fellow sales people who were men. I think my face looked exactly the same.

Thank you!

145 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:42:36am

re: #139 webevintage

Seriously?
You really can't think that was what he was doing...I mean, oh come on...
Really?

His audience seemed to think so. But hey, who am I to judge.

Take the blinders off. He is a politician. Idol worship usually ends badly.

146 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:42:46am

re: #131 Jimmah

What really hurts wingnuts about Obama is not that he is embarassing America in front of the world, but the exact opposite. There is in fact great respect and even affection for glee that there is now President Obama that they can push all over the world, in stark contrast to Bush.


ftfy, ya ole downdinger you!

147 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:42:53am

re: #131 Jimmah

What really hurts wingnuts about Obama is not that he is embarassing America in front of the world, but the exact opposite. There is in fact great respect and even affection for Obama all over the world, in stark contrast to Bush.

I am snarkless...

148 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:42:56am

re: #135 Racer X

Hahahahahahahahahahha!

*deep breath*

Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

Don't know why you are laughing. It's true.

149 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:43:06am

re: #136 ludwigvanquixote

Tell you what, make the same move with a female co-worker who knows you, and see how well that holds up if she makes a complaint.

re: #119 SixDegrees

Ummm, if you read what I said, I had been commenting on how there are those who create and perpetuate the stereotype of the ugly American. Exactly where you get a whole continent from is your lack of comprehension, not my lack of writing.

re: #116 reine.de.tout

Then look at her face again in this cut. I am rather surprised that her lifting her arms and pushing him off isn't a clue too.

150 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:43:35am

re: #137 funky chicken

Well, I think it's pretty clear that Realpolitik trumps silly idealism (I'm just pointing out existing realities in today's world. The U.S. certainly can't afford to piss-off the Chinese -- that's the reality, and it's even more so the case today, than in times past.)

151 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:44:12am

re: #133 Gus 802

But that's different.

//

Here's Nixon doing a slight bow to Hirohito.

Hirohito seems to be bowing back a tiny bit--as much as you can expect a man of that age and size to.

152 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:44:15am

re: #148 Jimmah

Don't know why you are laughing. It's true.

I know. Mancrush. I get it.

153 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:44:16am

re: #129 webevintage

From his Kansas granny. Believe me, I know!

154 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:44:36am

re: #145 Racer X

His audience seemed to think so. But hey, who am I to judge.

Take the blinders off. He is a politician. Idol worship usually ends badly.

Not only is he a pol he is a human being who has made and will make mistakes and do stupid shit.
No worship here.
I just like criticism to be based in reality...

155 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:44:51am

re: #131 Jimmah

What really hurts wingnuts about Obama is not that he is embarassing America in front of the world, but the exact opposite. There is in fact great respect and even affection among the Left for Obama all over the world, in stark contrast to Bush.

156 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:45:00am

re: #136 ludwigvanquixote

Tell you what, make the same move with a female co-worker who knows you, and see how well that holds up if she makes a complaint.

Tell you what. It's the same gesture I've made to dozens of female co-workers and employees that we had already established mutual respect for each other for years!

157 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:45:04am

re: #75 J.S.

the U.S. is junior partner in Asia...(obviousy).

Yes, absolutely the junior partner (though the one keeping Japan safe).

I am simply saying that the argument that this was cultural awareness is incorrect. As he performed it, the bow showed profound unawareness.

The Japanese government does not want a weak American president and his genuflection displayed weakness not just in Red State terms but much more importantly in Japanese terms.

I am looking forward to reading more in the Japanese press about this. So far, very very tellingly, the only images I have seen online in Japanese are from a mildly popular blog. Kyodo etc are running the picture with him and the empress where he, again in Japanese terms, looks quite dignified.

158 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:45:06am

re: #133 Gus 802

But that's different.

//

Here's Nixon doing a slight bow to Hirohito.

Good find!
It's really very strange how the wingnuts do this. They want to be both simultaneously convinced that Obama isn't really american, is a 'citizen of the world', has allegiances to the global community-- and at the same time believe him to be ignorant, bumbling, provinicial on the world stage. I keep thinking the cognitive dissonance will have to get to them at some point, but they seem to just thrive on it.

159 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:45:12am

re: #154 webevintage

Not only is he a pol he is a human being who has made and will make mistakes and do stupid shit.
No worship here.
I just like criticism to be based in reality...

Cool.

Cny criticism of Obama so far?

160 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:45:14am

re: #151 SanFranciscoZionist

Hirohito seems to be bowing back a tiny bit--as much as you can expect a man of that age and size to.

Yes. Last night I was looking at some of the photos of Hirohito in his later years and it seemed as though he was in a state of "permanent bow."

161 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:46:20am

re: #146 sattv4u2

ftfy, ya ole downdinger you!

Ah - you just expressed another wingnut fantasy - the rest of the world LOVES Obama - but only because they see him as their ally in bringing America down to size. Excellent!

Btw satty - if you make a few intelligent , well informed comments you'll soon find I'm also an updinger :)

162 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:46:23am

re: #158 iceweasel

Good find!
It's really very strange how the wingnuts do this. They want to be both simultaneously convinced that Obama isn't really american, is a 'citizen of the world', has allegiances to the global community-- and at the same time believe him to be ignorant, bumbling, provinicial on the world stage. I keep thinking the cognitive dissonance will have to get to them at some point, but they seem to just thrive on it.

It's both outrage and denial. Sound familiar? I think it is: passive-aggressive in many ways.

163 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:46:42am

re: #156 sattv4u2

Tell you what, make the same move with a female co-worker who knows you, and see how well that holds up if she makes a complaint.

Tell you what. It's the same gesture I've made to dozens of female co-workers and employees that we had already established mutual respect for each other for years!

And does her reaction look like she felt respected? Are you actually that stupid when it comes to women?

164 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:46:50am

re: #158 iceweasel

Good find!
It's really very strange how the wingnuts do this. They want to be both simultaneously convinced that Obama isn't really american, is a 'citizen of the world', has allegiances to the global community-- and at the same time believe him to be ignorant, bumbling, provinicial on the world stage. I keep thinking the cognitive dissonance will have to get to them at some point, but they seem to just thrive on it.

In his speech at this event, Nixon repeatedly referred to Hirohito as His Imperial Majesty.

But, Nixon also got the right bow.

165 Ministry of Fairness and Balance  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:46:53am

re: #40 iceweasel

I really don't understand how the rage machine thinks. It's not as if there were a shortage of legitimate criticisms to be making of Obama. Instead they waste their time on these bizarre manufactured fauxrages. Why?

Because in order to argue with Obama's policies or personnel choices, they would have to be able to formulate their arguments in coherent sentences, it is a lot easier to bellow outrage.

166 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:47:14am

Obama Flips Off Hillary Clinton? Slow Motion!

I really hate the "but *** did it too" argument.

167 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:47:45am

re: #140 Racer X

When you love a politician so deeply, so blindly, you are bound to be disappointed.

I've noticed that one of the flip sides of really hating Obama seems to be a conviction that anyone who will defend him even a little must be absolutely in LURRRVE with him.

168 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:47:51am

re: #157 tokyobk

The CBC has been filing reports, on the island of Okinawa -- there have been huge demonstrations (I suppose you may have caught those) -- they want the U.S. base shut down and Americans out...(lots of problems there...)

169 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:48:02am

re: #156 sattv4u2

Although personally, I really don't like to be touched by male co-workers. No matter how long I have known them. Just a handshake, thanks.

170 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:48:38am

re: #163 ludwigvanquixote

And does her reaction look like she felt respected? Are you actually that stupid when it comes to women?

Answer the question I posed in #81. Why does the video cut off there (after only 5 seconds)

Can you say BDS? I know you can!!

171 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:48:39am

re: #159 Racer X

Cool.

Cny criticism of Obama so far?

I have some criticism of him. The wars aren't over yet, the economy hasn't completely turned around, and I don't have a magical pony on my doorstep. Why hasn't he done this yet? Disgraceful.

And any President who doesn't round house kick a foreign leader every time he meets him shows how weak he is. I will be working on drafting Chuck Norris so that America can be great again.

172 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:48:54am

re: #168 J.S.

J.S. Yes, this is an issue and has been since the close of WWII.

Okinawa is alas treated as American property and was actually so until the 1970's.

173 BSM ENGINEER  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:48:55am

re: #124 Jeff In Ohio

Thank your father for me. Those guys were amazing. As for shooting officers, I am one, and believe me I agree with with your father much of the time!!!

174 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:49:10am

re: #167 SanFranciscoZionist

I've noticed that one of the flip sides of really hating Obama seems to be a conviction that anyone who will defend him even a little must be absolutely in LURRRVE with him.

OK. You're right. I promise not to really hate him, if you promise not to really love him.

Deal?

175 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:49:43am

re: #170 sattv4u2

Answer the question I posed in #81. Why does the video cut off there (after only 5 seconds)

Can you say BDS? I know you can!!

Well it cuts off because she flipped out, and he slinked off.

What astonishes me is you actually think there was nothing wrong with that. Did you grow up in a barn?

176 acwgusa  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:50:38am
A common theme among all this outraged ranting is that US Presidents must never bow to a foreign leader. Bloggers all over the country are utterly convinced of it, as if they learned this fine point of Presidential etiquette right after the Pledge of Allegiance in Civics 101.

Must be Civics class in crazy opposite land, Charles. My Civics class taught me that the President is head of state of the United States, and has protocol experts to advise him.

177 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:51:06am

re: #157 tokyobk

Yes, absolutely the junior partner (though the one keeping Japan safe).

I am simply saying that the argument that this was cultural awareness is incorrect. As he performed it, the bow showed profound unawareness.

The Japanese government does not want a weak American president and his genuflection displayed weakness not just in Red State terms but much more importantly in Japanese terms.

I am looking forward to reading more in the Japanese press about this. So far, very very tellingly, the only images I have seen online in Japanese are from a mildly popular blog. Kyodo etc are running the picture with him and the empress where he, again in Japanese terms, looks quite dignified.

Let me know if anything pops up.

178 simoom  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:51:27am

re: #49 Conservative Moonbat

Tea Partiers Heckle Gore Speech

Every time the Tea Party folks muddy their original message by branching out into unrelated right-wing causes, they put one more nail into the coffin of their "our movement is completely nonpartisan" BS.

179 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:51:45am

re: #175 ludwigvanquixote

Well it cuts off because she flipped out, and he slinked off.

What astonishes me is you actually think there was nothing wrong with that. Did you grow up in a barn?


Wow ,, until just then, ,I didn;t think you were serious!!

wow !! ,,, just ,, WOW !!


AND ,,, for awhile there, you were doing so well restraining yourself from name calling
Oh well ,, it was nice while it lasted.

180 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:52:30am

re: #159 Racer X

Cool.

Cny criticism of Obama so far?

Well, if you can point to something that needs criticism you will get it. I am very concerned about his intentions in the M.E. and what he intends to do or not do with Iran.

I think the cap and trade bill will not properly address AGW.

There are a lot of things I would like him to do differently.

However, he is not a fool or a commie or someone scraping to other governments as you would seem to wish to paint him.

181 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:52:34am

Economy - still bad. We were promised it would improve by now. Fail

Budget mess - the national debt is skyrocketing. Spend more. Fail

Hows that diplomacy working for ya? Does ANYONE love us again yet?

The terror trials will be a total disaster. How can they NOT?

182 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:52:43am

re: #166 Racer X

Obama's gesture 'looks' planned. Of course we'll never know unless he confirms (or denies) it one day.

183 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:52:44am

re: #167 SanFranciscoZionist

I've noticed that one of the flip sides of really hating Obama seems to be a conviction that anyone who will defend him even a little must be absolutely in LURRRVE with him.

Yeah, it's weird. I don't know anyone who luuurves Obama.

184 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:53:18am

re: #178 simoom

Every time the Tea Party folks muddy their original message by branching out into unrelated right-wing causes, they put one more nail into the coffin of their "our movement is completely nonpartisan" BS.

Original message? What was that? I think, whatever it was, it was already pretty muddy.

185 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:53:39am

re: #179 sattv4u2

Wow ,, until just then, ,I didn;t think you were serious!!

wow !! ,,, just ,, WOW !!

AND ,,, for awhile there, you were doing so well restraining yourself from name calling
Oh well ,, it was nice while it lasted.

Yeah I'll call you so utterly tone deaf to women and their sensibilities as to make you something a little worse than a sexist. You are one of those who is so set in his primitive ways that he can not even get what is wrong.

186 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:53:46am

re: #166 Racer X

Obama Flips Off Hillary Clinton? Slow Motion!

[Video]

I really hate the "but *** did it too" argument.

Come on. It's a valid argument. It may not excuse either of them--it doesn't, they both screwed up--but there's no reason to think that gaffes are valid when talking about one president and not another.

187 Pepper Fox  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:53:48am

Didn't Bush Jr. kiss the Saudi king, then hold hands with him?

188 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:03am

re: #169 prairiefire

Although personally, I really don't like to be touched by male co-workers. No matter how long I have known them. Just a handshake, thanks.

Well,, perhaps I've just been blessed in my life that I have been around women that don't think every gesture by a man is cause for alarm and a lawsuit.

189 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:04am

re: #159 Racer X

Cool.

Cny criticism of Obama so far?

At 10 months?
Not really, but at 10 months I did not have many problems with Bush either.

Any criticism I might have is based on expectations that may or may not be realistic.
I think he needs to get a move on with Afghanistan, leave or do it right.
I think he should have not left health care reform so much in the hand of Congress.
I think there are some folks who should be walking around in orange jumpsuits who are not, I like looking backwards.
Not sure about the stim plan, but that is something you can't judge yet.
Would like them to bring the hammer down on blue dogs...

190 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:11am

I can see the down dingers don't like Youtube.

Ha!

191 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:18am

re: #181 Racer X

Economy - still bad. We were promised it would improve by now. Fail

Budget mess - the national debt is skyrocketing. Spend more. Fail

Hows that diplomacy working for ya? Does ANYONE love us again yet?

The terror trials will be a total disaster. How can they NOT?

Hahaha... See my #171... My satire is your reality.

192 HelloDare  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:18am

Nixon, Clinton, Bush all bowing to Hirohito. We need some empirical data. Drag out the inclinometer.

I'm unclear whether we have to correlated the date according to the height of the supplicant. Any opinions?

193 Killgore Trout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:23am

As a reality check I looked up Obama's approval rating. He's doing well despite all the noise about him being a weak, arrogant, extremist, radical, etc. It's very unlikely that Obama will be the worst president of all time.

194 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:47am

I voted for Obama, I detest ODS and nontroversies, but right now I'm getting roasted by my lefty friends for pointing out his Hamlet-like stance on issues such as Afghanistan, "don't ask, don't tell", Guantánamo, and other minor points. They take issue with me for using the word "dithering", because Cheney used it. Well, I think Cheney is a dick, but even he can choose the right word now and again. And I was coxswain on my college's Varsity Dithering Crew, so I know it when I see it.

Plus ça change

George Bush could do no right.
Barack can do no wrong.
With hope alone, things stay the same.
How long, O Lord, how long?

Copyright 2009 Cato the Elder

195 acwgusa  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:51am

re: #183 iceweasel

Yeah, it's weird. I don't know anyone who luuurves Obama.

Obama has gotten an enthusiastic "meh" from me. Congress, on the other hand, can vacate the premises as soon as possible.

196 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:54:58am

re: #174 Racer X

OK. You're right. I promise not to really hate him, if you promise not to really love him.

Deal?

Heck, that's easy for me! I'm still ticked off that Hillary didn't get the nomination.

197 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:55:11am

Thank goodness there weren't any bloggers around in MacArthur's day. Not that MacArthur bowed but he certainly bowed to Hirohito's status and importance in post Imperialist Japan.

198 Pepper Fox  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:55:22am

re: #193 Killgore Trout

As a reality check I looked up Obama's approval rating. He's doing well despite all the noise about him being a weak, arrogant, extremist, radical, etc. It's very unlikely that Obama will be the worst president of all time.

Ha more Republicans approve of him than the overall rate of Bush when he was in office. That's great.

199 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:55:29am

re: #189 webevintage

I see where you are coming from.

200 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:55:32am

re: #185 ludwigvanquixote

Yeah I'll call you so utterly tone deaf to women and their sensibilities as to make you something a little worse than a sexist. You are one of those who is so set in his primitive ways that he can not even get what is wrong.

summed up in two letters

PC

201 Killgore Trout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:56:08am

re: #198 Pepper Fox

Ha more Republicans approve of him than the overall rate of Bush when he was in office. That's great.

Lol, I hadn't noticed that.

202 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:56:31am

re: #191 recusancy

Hahaha... See my #171... My satire is your reality.

Cool.

So we're both on the same page then?

203 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:57:38am

re: #196 SanFranciscoZionist

Heck, that's easy for me! I'm still ticked off that Hillary didn't get the nomination.

So is Hillary.

204 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:57:53am

re: #183 iceweasel

Yeah, it's weird. I don't know anyone who luuurves Obama.

I know a few, but not a lot. Most of them are sixteen years old, and haven't gotten over seeing a black man be president yet.

205 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:57:58am

re: #191 recusancy

Hahaha... See my #171... My satire is your reality.

Reality has a well-known liberal bias! /

206 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:58:07am

re: #169 prairiefire

Although personally, I really don't like to be touched by male co-workers. No matter how long I have known them. Just a handshake, thanks.

Yep. It's a lot easier just to play it safe with co-workers. The office isn't a bar - well, unless you work in a bar.

207 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:58:19am

re: #188 sattv4u2

Well,, perhaps I've just been blessed in my life that I have been around women that don't think every gesture by a man is cause for alarm and a lawsuit.

It maybe that they do mind it they have just never told you.
I would be creeped out if a guy, even one I had known for a long time, gave me a shoulder rub.
Really...and I mean this in the nicest way...it bugs women to be touched that way by guys they are not related to or intimate with.

208 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:58:31am

re: #200 sattv4u2

summed up in two letters

PC

Summed up in two words:

Sexist idiot.

209 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:58:49am

re: #167 SanFranciscoZionist

I've noticed that one of the flip sides of really hating Obama seems to be a conviction that anyone who will defend him even a little must be absolutely in LURRRVE with him.

And the converse is true when it comes to Bush, don't you think?

210 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:58:54am

re: #188 sattv4u2

It's not a date. It's a WORK relationship. I understand there are completely well intentioned, kind hearted guys out there that have no other motives. It is just so hard for me to tell them apart! I tend to err on the side of caution.

211 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:59:16am

Dammit. I cannot get these videos to play.
- G. Brown

212 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:59:40am

re: #207 webevintage

It maybe that they do mind it they have just never told you.
I would be creeped out if a guy, even one I had known for a long time, gave me a shoulder rub.
Really...and I mean this in the nicest way...it bugs women to be touched that way by guys they are not related to or intimate with.

Perhaps you can explain it to him. Of course he might just see you as one of those feminist types who will file a lawsuit for no reason...

213 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:00:41pm

re: #207 webevintage

re: #207 webevintage

It maybe that they do mind it they have just never told you

Thats where you'd be wrong. We've talked about it.

214 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:01:01pm

re: #200 sattv4u2

summed up in two letters

PC

Hold on. It's 'politically correct' to point out that a man does not walk up to a woman who's not, say, his wife, and put his hands on her?

I don't think Bush meant any harm, but he crossed a line, and dismissing that as 'PC' is ridiculous.

215 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:01:29pm

re: #190 Racer X

I can see the down dingers don't like Youtube.

Ha!

Maybe they are not impressed by silly attempts to turn a simple face scratch into a dastardly insult.

216 simoom  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:01:29pm

re: #166 Racer X

Obama Flips Off Hillary Clinton? Slow Motion!


[Video]

I really hate the "but *** did it too" argument.

That was a completely manufactured controversy from the primaries.

There were videos of the event from so many different angles that it was quickly apparent Obama scratched his cheek/nose with three fingers. It's something he does multiple times during many of his primary speeches. In fact, the evidence was so clear from the side-view videos that the outrage-a-holics quickly switched to an "Obama deviously flipped Hillary the plausibly deniable three fingered bird" argument.

217 acwgusa  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:01:30pm

re: #204 SanFranciscoZionist

I know a few, but not a lot. Most of them are sixteen years old, and haven't gotten over seeing a black man be president yet.

I think Obama is the complete antithesis of the ideal of what Martin Luther King Jr. wanted. Obama was judged on the color of his skin, and not the content of his character, which tells me we still have room to evolve.

218 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:01:30pm

Hey I was never shy about knocking Bush around. I'm not gonna start being shy with this president either.

Politicians suck. They should always be looked upon with a wary eye.

219 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:01:38pm

re: #183 iceweasel

Yeah, it's weird. I don't know anyone who luuurves Obama.

I do. It's rather pathetic, really.

220 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:02:06pm

re: #215 Jimmah

Maybe they are not impressed by silly attempts to turn a simple face scratch into a dastardly insult.

Hahahahahahahaha!

You used the word 'dastardly'!

221 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:02:30pm

re: #219 Cato the Elder

I'm a bit crushy, when he talks real liberal.

222 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:02:55pm

re: #210 prairiefire

It's not a date. It's a WORK relationship. I understand there are completely well intentioned, kind hearted guys out there that have no other motives. It is just so hard for me to tell them apart! I tend to err on the side of caution.

Sorry, but I never hired or worked with automatons. They were all PEOPLE, and we all treated each other as such!

Great life long freindships even developed. There was even two cases in the business I owened where co-workers met and (GASP) GOT MARRIED

(((I'm GodFather to one of the kids, btw)))

223 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:03:16pm

re: #212 ludwigvanquixote

Perhaps you can explain it to him. Of course he might just see you as one of those feminist types who will file a lawsuit for no reason...

The thing is most women, even us crazy feminist types, just ignore things like that.
It bugs us to no end, but we see the guy as basically harmless or respect them as a co-worker, we like him normally, just know he is "touchy". Of course among ourselves we'll be like "God, I wish he would not touch me"..."oh look, here comes shoulderrubdude"...

224 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:03:22pm

re: #216 simoom

That was a completely manufactured controversy from the primaries.

There were videos of the event from so many different angles that it was quickly apparent Obama scratched his cheek/nose with three fingers. It's something he does multiple times during many of his primary speeches. In fact, the evidence was so clear from the side-view videos that the outrage-a-holics quickly switched to an "Obama deviously flipped Hillary the plausibly deniable three fingered bird" argument.

Yep.

I thought the lipstick on a pig comment was pretty classy too.

225 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:03:24pm

re: #209 sattv4u2

And the converse is true when it comes to Bush, don't you think?

Not really. I defended Bush from time to time on left-leaning blogs, and I didn't get the immediate "Ohhh, he can do no wrong, I guess you just want to blow up the whole world to save us from the terrorists" response that would be the flip.

This is not to say that there isn't a whole lot of BDS out there, but there doesn't seem to be the same obsession with the idea that Bush's supporters are totally in the tank for him, and hang on his every word, quasi-worshipping him.

Just my experience.

226 hearmemeow  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:03:37pm

According to this article, bowing has been counter to protocol for 200 years.
[Link: www.nytimes.com...]

Bowing and shaking hands simultaneously is pretty funny. Overall, Obama comes off as a studious little peasant boy who thinks everyone else is an oaf and uses every opportunity to demonstrate to the world that he is the master of appropriate behavior. Unfortunately, given his utter lack of practice, he keeps bungling it.

I am sure that by his fourth term, as we ride the stimulus comet out of the mother of all depressions, he will have mastered protocol and emerged as the Emily Post of political summitry. Which will be a good thing, for by then the country will be so emasculated that only our extraordinary social graces will keep the world's bad boys from eating all of our lunch.

227 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:04:01pm

re: #210 prairiefire

It's not a date. It's a WORK relationship. I understand there are completely well intentioned, kind hearted guys out there that have no other motives. It is just so hard for me to tell them apart! I tend to err on the side of caution.

You shouldn't have to err on any side.

It is a work relationship. Period.

What astonishes me is that there are actually men out there who feel the need to pretend it is different.

To some one like Satt, if there were an openly gay co-worker, who just gave you a friendly back rub at work, how would you respond?

See, it's actually very easy to think about if you take away your perceived "right" to rub women's backs.

The rules are really simple. If someone is your good friend, and it is previously established that she would welcome such an activity, then fine, go for it - but at the workplace is likely not a good environment, because it can blurr relationships.

On the other hand, if you do not have that sort of bond established, don't even try it.

228 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:04:04pm

re: #207 webevintage

It maybe that they do mind it they have just never told you.
I would be creeped out if a guy, even one I had known for a long time, gave me a shoulder rub.
Really...and I mean this in the nicest way...it bugs women to be touched that way by guys they are not related to or intimate with.

Absolutely. It's an invasion of personal space. Consider also the experience of it-- (I've had it happen to me as well) -- the person approaches you from the back and you may not even know who it is touching you at first, plus you're being touched while in a business environment-- It makes me jump and it's extremely uncomfortable.

The element of surprise is what makes it worse than someone who maybe pulls you in for a hug or something like that-- you can't see it or prepare for it. Just extremely inappropriate.

Finally, and this is what makes it worst of all, -- it's something men wouldn't be doing to you if you were a male colleague. That's why it has no place in a professional environment-- or you should make triply sure your colleague doesn't mind it, anyway.

229 craigs111  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:04:14pm

While this is a nonconttreversy it is hardly a issue invented by the right. Presidents do not bow to anyone. This is Dept of State protocol 101, most people know this. It was not invented by the right and is hardly urban legend.

When Clinton partially bowed to the Japanese Emperor in 94 the NYT had no trouble calling him on it.

It seems both sides are guilty here. The right for over blowing an obvious blunder by a clueless President. There is no hidden meaning for his inept behavior. The dude simply has a problem with proper protocol in many situations - including when to salute the flag and a soldier. The left is just as guilty for making lame excuses for our Presidents sophomoric behavior.

I can hear Merkel, Sarkosy and Bertlosconi laughing their asses off now!!

230 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:04:31pm

I've had female colleagues touch me in unexpected but purely friendly ways.

Should I be upset? I can be upset in retrospect, I guess.

231 livfreeordie  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:04:38pm

From the link in #35 New York TImes 1994
" But the "thou need not bow" commandment from the State Department's protocol office maintained a constancy of more than 200 years[emphasis added]. Administration officials scurried to insist that the eager-to-please President had not really done the unthinkable."

Key phrase is constancy of more than 200 years. And there are difference between a big nod of the head as in Eisenhower and a 90 degree bow...

Whole controversy interesting, indicative but not dispositive of Obama attitude. Sad to think that Charles assuming urban legend and right wing crazies (and yes there are right wing crazies but we can handle them, Islam on the other hand...)

232 funky chicken  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:04:51pm

re: #157 tokyobk

Yes, absolutely the junior partner (though the one keeping Japan safe).

I am simply saying that the argument that this was cultural awareness is incorrect. As he performed it, the bow showed profound unawareness.

The Japanese government does not want a weak American president and his genuflection displayed weakness not just in Red State terms but much more importantly in Japanese terms.

I am looking forward to reading more in the Japanese press about this. So far, very very tellingly, the only images I have seen online in Japanese are from a mildly popular blog. Kyodo etc are running the picture with him and the empress where he, again in Japanese terms, looks quite dignified.

Well, our exuberantly youthful voters elected an exuberantly youthful president. He'll make some little mistakes.

233 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:05:15pm

re: #213 sattv4u2

re: #207 webevintage

It maybe that they do mind it they have just never told you

Thats where you'd be wrong. We've talked about it.

And Bush clearly did not talk to Merckel about it...

Tell you what...

If there were an openly gay co-worker, that wasn't really your friend, who just gave you a friendly back rub at work, how would you respond?

234 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:05:16pm

re: #222 sattv4u2

Congratulations! Sincerely, that's wonderful to watch folks grow up.

235 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:06:30pm

re: #232 funky chicken

Well, our exuberantly youthful voters elected an exuberantly youthful president. He'll make some little mistakes.

That is true. I think generally its no biggie though the general pattern; cheap gifts to the English, these kinds of things can add up.

I like and admire Obama and wish him well.

236 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:07:27pm

re: #230 Cato the Elder

I've had female colleagues touch me in unexpected but purely friendly ways.

Should I be upset? I can be upset in retrospect, I guess.

There is a difference between a pat on the arm, or a touch on the hand and rubbing a back. I am astonished that people don't get this.

Seriously cato, would you walk up to some female co-worker and rub her back out of the blue if she weren't already and established close friend. Moreover, would you do it at work, in public, in front of other people?

237 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:07:32pm

If Obama is such a great leader - why are so many Americans pissed off at him? Shouldn't a leader be able to unite people?

238 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:07:32pm

re: #227 ludwigvanquixote

To some one like Satt, if there were an openly gay co-worker, who just gave you a friendly back rub at work, how would you respond?

Does that mean you want me to stop giving a hug to my gay co-worker, the same way the straight co-workers greet each other?
Won;t he feel left out if I give a straight one that hello hug and not him? Will he feel ostrisized?

239 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:08:04pm

re: #230 Cato the Elder

I've had female colleagues touch me in unexpected but purely friendly ways.

Should I be upset? I can be upset in retrospect, I guess.

Only if it upsets you.
Did you welcome their unexpected touch or was it creepy?
Was there pie involved?

240 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:08:13pm

re: #217 acwgusa

I think Obama is the complete antithesis of the ideal of what Martin Luther King Jr. wanted. Obama was judged on the color of his skin, and not the content of his character, which tells me we still have room to evolve.

We have room to evolve, but King did not mean that we were all gonna develop fake colorblindness. It's cause for rejoicing that America has gotten to a point where we will elect a black president. Even for thos of us who do not like the actual president elected.

241 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:08:15pm

Side note: Those using the word "genuflection" to pour scorn on the bow seen round the world really ought to check their dictionaries.

No genus were flexed in the performance of this bow.

242 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:08:41pm

re: #210 prairiefire

It's not a date. It's a WORK relationship. I understand there are completely well intentioned, kind hearted guys out there that have no other motives. It is just so hard for me to tell them apart! I tend to err on the side of caution.

My opinion is that if a guy periodically mentions his wife or girlfriend, he probably means no harm because he's making it clear that she means a lot to him. OTOH, when a married guy--or one with a girlfriend--doesn't mention his partner AND has done something that could be perceived as nefarious, there's a red flag.

I've brought up my girlfriend around women for the specific reason to try to make it clear that I don't intend to hit on them.

243 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:08:58pm

re: #233 ludwigvanquixote

And Bush clearly did not talk to Merckel about it...

Tell you what...

If there were an openly gay co-worker, that wasn't really your friend, who just gave you a friendly back rub at work, how would you respond?


nd you KNOW that how? From a 5 second clip that was CUT before you could see the next interaction!

244 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:08:58pm

re: #238 sattv4u2

To some one like Satt, if there were an openly gay co-worker, who just gave you a friendly back rub at work, how would you respond?

Does that mean you want me to stop giving a hug to my gay co-worker, the same way the straight co-workers greet each other?
Won;t he feel left out if I give a straight one that hello hug and not him? Will he feel ostrisized?

Do you give your gay co-workers shoulder rubs? That's what we're talking about here.

245 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:09:26pm

re: #237 Racer X

There actually is no Obama panacea, although the right mocked us for thinking so.

246 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:09:38pm

re: #237 Racer X

If Obama is such a great leader - why are so many Americans pissed off at him? Shouldn't a leader be able to unite people?

You mean the way Bush did?

247 spinmore  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:09:38pm

re: #230 Cato the Elder

I've had female colleagues touch me in unexpected but purely friendly ways.

Should I be upset? I can be upset in retrospect, I guess.

I think it was Benny Hill -
"I'll give you 15 minutes to stop, or I'm calling the police"

248 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:09:39pm

re: #224 Racer X

Yep.

I thought the lipstick on a pig comment was pretty classy too.

Which one, Obama's or McCain's?

249 Dave Brown  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:09:40pm

While I agree with the general appropriateness of one Sovereign leader following protocol with another (including bowing, hopping on one foot, or whatever...), the historical basis for not bowing to an "Emperor" is probably found in the unique Revolutionary era American tradition of not recognizing royalty or followers of royalty. For example, this anathema was reflected in the Naturalization Act of 1795:

"It shall further appear to their satisfaction that during that time he has behaved as a man of a good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well-disposed to the good order and happiness of the same. Fourthly. In case the alien applying to be admitted to citizenship shall have borne any hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility, in the kingdom or state from which he came, he shall, in addition to the above requisites, make an express renunciation of his title or order of nobility in the court to which his application shall be made; which renunciation shall be recorded in the said court."

However, this anti-royalist bent seems to have disappeared about a hundred years ago, and most Americans seem to see nothing wrong with honoring Monarchs, some of whom (like Japan's emperor) also claim to be "gods".

This has nothing to do with Obama, the Democrats or partisan politics in general. You'd be hard-pressed to find any major US political Party for whom anti-royal issues are significant. As far as popular sentiment goes... can you say "Princess Di"?

Get over it. We're going to hell in a bucket. Enjoy the ride?

250 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:10:13pm

re: #246 Cato the Elder

You mean the way Bush did?

No, the way Reagan did.

251 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:11:23pm

re: #248 SanFranciscoZionist

Which one, Obama's or McCain's?

Please. McCain used it to describe a piece of legislation. Obama clearly used it in a derogatory way. Or do you gloss that over?

252 simoom  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:11:31pm

re: #224 Racer X

Here's one of the side-view videos from that Raleigh, NC event. Click the full screen button and jump to about 20:50 for the cheek scratch in question.

[Link: www.ustream.tv...]

253 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:11:58pm

re: #237 Racer X

If Obama is such a great leader - why are so many Americans pissed off at him? Shouldn't a leader be able to unite people?

Remember Reagan?

(Which is not to say I would classify Obama as a 'great' leader.)

254 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:12:01pm

re: #244 recusancy

Do you give your gay co-workers shoulder rubs? That's what we're talking about here.

Yup. If he's sitting in the control room and he's at the console (meaning he's in charge of the operations board. Very stressful at times. You have to sit there for several hours at times without getting up)

We ALL do it. A little rub to ease the tension. Just a second or so. Men to men, women to men, men to women, women to women. The same "rub" I saw in the video. Just a "How Ya Doin"

255 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:12:28pm

re: #252 simoom

Yawn.

The crowd went wild. They knew what it meant. He's done it before. Its his style.

256 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:12:28pm

re: #239 webevintage

Only if it upsets you.
Did you welcome their unexpected touch or was it creepy?
Was there pie involved?

No pie, just endorphins.

257 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:12:31pm

re: #247 spinmore

I think it was Benny Hill -
"I'll give you 15 minutes to stop, or I'm calling the police"

Exactly. Men are not women and what we perceive from unsolicited violations of personal space is not the same and most likely never will be.

258 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:13:00pm

re: #219 Cato the Elder

Bush has me so distraught, hangdog John Kerry looked good! And do not get me started on Jim Webb.

259 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:13:10pm

re: #243 sattv4u2

nd you KNOW that how? From a 5 second clip that was CUT before you could see the next interaction!

Again, look at her face and the way she shrugs him off with closed hands, the way she stiffens, and the way he slinks off.

Has it been that long since you saw a woman in person?

That is not the way women look when they are happy.

As to your other comments, stop dodging the question.

I know that I am not going to educate you, but I might at least get you to see just how ridiculous some of what you are saying is. In most human interactions, a back rub is an intimate act. A clearly non-sexual hug, on greeting much less so.

Is there a difference?

Perhaps not to you, but pretty much the rest of the species gets it.

260 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:13:25pm

re: #254 sattv4u2

Sounds more work place related.

261 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:13:34pm

re: #226 hearmemeow

Overall, Obama comes off as a studious little peasant boy who thinks everyone else is an oaf

i don't even know where to begin parsing that monstrosity of a comment so we'll stick with this fragment.

1) There are peasants who think of nonpeasants as 'oafs'?

2) What do you mean, 'peasant'? Obama's background not royal enough for you?

3) Obama just turned 48.

262 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:13:35pm

re: #253 SanFranciscoZionist

Remember Reagan?

(Which is not to say I would classify Obama as a 'great' leader.)

Love him or hate him, Reagan got shit done. He did not polarize the country.

263 simoom  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:13:45pm

re: #255 Racer X

Yawn.

The crowd went wild. They knew what it meant. He's done it before. Its his style.

Ah, I see you are in the secret two-and-a-half fingered stealth bird camp.

264 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:14:00pm

re: #259 ludwigvanquixote

And you still haven't answered post #81

265 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:14:07pm

re: #250 Racer X

No, the way Reagan did.

Were you alive during the Reagan years?

I do not remember a united country.

266 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:14:17pm

re: #260 prairiefire

I just sold food.

267 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:14:19pm

re: #237 Racer X

If Obama BUSH was such a great leader - why are so many Americans pissed off at him? Shouldn't a leader be able to unite people?

Hmmm...

268 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:14:46pm

re: #251 Racer X

Please. McCain used it to describe a piece of legislation. Obama clearly used it in a derogatory way. Or do you gloss that over?

I don't gloss it over, I disagree. You can argue that McCain meant Hillary and Obama meant Palin. Or you can actually take a face value what they were talking about.

269 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:15:02pm

WTF does Bush have to do with this? Lord knows if this was a thread critical of Republicans some progressives around here would pitch a fit to get it back on topic. This isn't about Bush's gaffes, which despite comments on this thread to the contrary, no one is defending.

270 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:15:02pm

re: #262 Racer X

After his letters were published, I personally (in my head) apologized to him.

271 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:15:03pm

re: #262 Racer X

Love him or hate him, Reagan got shit done. He did not polarize the country.

Ummm.. Both of those can't be true.

272 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:15:40pm

re: #265 Cato the Elder

Were you alive during the Reagan years?

I do not remember a united country.

Yeah, I was living in a car at the time, but my recollection is not to sugary.

273 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:15:54pm

re: #262 Racer X

Love him or hate him, Reagan got shit done. He did not polarize the country.

274 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:15:56pm

BDS is still strong, even with a new President. Amazing.

275 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:16:02pm

re: #260 prairiefire

Sounds more work place related.

Thats what I was asked about, Thats what I responded too (I'm funny that way)

As to NON worplace related ,,, hmm,, geee ,, same thing. I'm blessed with female friends that do NOT get freaked of I touch their arm, give them a hello hug OR walk up to them while they are seated and give a little shoulder squeeze

276 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:16:20pm

re: #264 sattv4u2

And you still haven't answered post #81

I did, quite clearly.

She was clearly to any who is not utterly blind and stupid, unhappy, he slinks off. It cut off because there is no more to show. Further, there are political things involved, even if she were boiling angry, she would not slap the US president. No she would feel constrained to pretend it didn't happen. Of course that is what he started doing the moment she shrugged him off.

You really are blind aren't you?

277 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:16:29pm

re: #269 Sharmuta

Oh come on, Sharmuta, it's all about Bush -- haven't you got the memo yet?
/

278 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:16:53pm

re: #265 Cato the Elder

Were you alive during the Reagan years?

I do not remember a united country.

My rememberrer works fine. Yes there was controversy and he had his detractors. Shit got done.

279 acwgusa  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:17:18pm

re: #240 SanFranciscoZionist

We have room to evolve, but King did not mean that we were all gonna develop fake colorblindness. It's cause for rejoicing that America has gotten to a point where we will elect a black president. Even for thos of us who do not like the actual president elected.

I agree that its good that its good that we finally reached a place were America elected a black president and I should have worded my comment a little better, because I came off like a foaming racist. I wanted to convey that I hoped Obama was elected by his character, and that his skin color wasn't a consideration, and I blew it.

280 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:17:31pm

re: #275 sattv4u2

Great! : >

281 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:17:31pm

re: #254 sattv4u2

Yup. If he's sitting in the control room and he's at the console (meaning he's in charge of the operations board. Very stressful at times. You have to sit there for several hours at times without getting up)

We ALL do it. A little rub to ease the tension. Just a second or so. Men to men, women to men, men to women, women to women. The same "rub" I saw in the video. Just a "How Ya Doin"


Then it works at your business.
What we are saying is that for a lot of women we just let things like that go, say it is no big deal, but actually it bugs us and a back rub is more intimate then a hug and really, really is an invasion of personal space.
and we really might not say anything if the dude doing the backrub is the boss.
I'd rather have a glass of wine during times of stress from a co-worker then a back rub.

282 dugmartsch  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:17:45pm

re: #131 Jimmah

What really hurts wingnuts about Obama is not that he is embarassing America in front of the world, but the exact opposite. There is in fact great respect and even affection for Obama all over the world, in stark contrast to Bush.

In Bush's defense (and I am the opposite of a fan of Bush) this shit is the easy part. It's when he starts doing stuff that the rest of the world actually disagrees with that it gets hard and that 'affection' disappears really quick when the rubber meets the road. Bush discovered that pretty starkly with the post 9-11 love fest and the summary unraveling of that love.

I think this kind of stuff goes in the absolutely can't hurt, probably doesn't help, and isn't in itself any kind of foreign policy. Which is why I think the right loves getting pissed off about it: easy to fixate on and completely meaningless.

283 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:18:03pm

re: #265 Cato the Elder

Were you alive during the Reagan years?

I do not remember a united country.

Really?

284 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:18:07pm

re: #275 sattv4u2

Thats what I was asked about, Thats what I responded too (I'm funny that way)

As to NON worplace related ,,, hmm,, geee ,, same thing. I'm blessed with female friends that do NOT get freaked of I touch their arm, give them a hello hug OR walk up to them while they are seated and give a little shoulder squeeze

But what about an unsolicited back rub or other forms of more intimate touch?

How about you answer my question?

And while we are at it, your whole "blessed with females who won't get upset" language is another way of you saying that you think you have a right to such behavior in general. You really are hopeless.

285 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:18:09pm

re: #267 ludwigvanquixote

Hmmm...

Ed Zachery!

Obama is as divisive as Bush.

Man you guys are slow.

286 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:18:10pm

re: #267 ludwigvanquixote

Hmmm...

I want my country baaaccckkk
/

287 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:18:36pm
288 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:18:48pm

re: #262 Racer X

Love him or hate him, Reagan got shit done. He did not polarize the country.

That is the most laughable statement since...well...since your last laughable statement.

289 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:19:25pm

re: #276 ludwigvanquixote

I did, quite clearly.

She was clearly to any who is not utterly blind and stupid, unhappy, he slinks off. It cut off because there is no more to show. Further, there are political things involved, even if she were boiling angry, she would not slap the US president. No she would feel constrained to pretend it didn't happen. Of course that is what he started doing the moment she shrugged him off.

You really are blind aren't you?


No ,, you were asked A) or B) what do you beleive happened

Here ,, I'll refresh your memory

What do you think happened?
A) Merkel stands up and throws a glass of water in his face
B) Merkel stands up, goes over to him and they start talking

You were asked for an opinion, because the video leaves the outcome nebulous

SO ,,, A),, or B) ??

290 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:20:09pm

re: #288 Cato the Elder

That is the most laughable statement since...well...since your last laughable statement.

re: #283 Sharmuta

Really?

I r such an eediot.

291 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:20:44pm
292 spinmore  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:20:45pm

I Love Dubya

293 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:21:03pm

re: #284 ludwigvanquixote

other forms of more intimate touch?

Oh for Charlie The Tunas sake. He touched her SHOUDLERS,,,The TOP of her TOTALLY CLOTHED shoulders
He didn;'t give her a naked Tokyo Spa massage

294 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:21:18pm

re: #283 Sharmuta

Really?

Reagan got shot. It's amazing what a national tragedy will do to national unity. See 9/11.

295 Pepper Fox  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:21:49pm

re: #291 Gus 802

[Link: www.gettyimages.com...]

It seems that Americans have to bow, not necessarily out of tradition or respect, but out of the sheer physics of having to shake the other person's hand.

296 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:21:50pm

re: #288 Cato the Elder

Were you in Europe during the Reagan years by any chance? (the only thing I ever heard about Reagan -- it was like Reagan Derangement Syndrome -- and I was shockced to discover that anyone in the U.S. would "like" such a war-mongering, ultra-right-winger with his Star Wars proporsals, etc., etc.)

297 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:21:54pm

re: #294 recusancy

Reagan got shot. It's amazing what a national tragedy will do to national unity. See 9/11.

He was shot years before his reelection, but nice try.

298 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:22:01pm

re: #294 recusancy

Reagan got shot. It's amazing what a national tragedy will do to national unity. See 9/11.

Rove you magnificent Bastard!

299 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:22:04pm

re: #283 Sharmuta

Really?

THATS gonna leave a nasty bruise!

300 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:22:22pm

My old friend Jake quotes this here anonymous lizard:

[Link: blogs.abcnews.com...]

301 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:23:09pm

re: #295 Pepper Fox

It seems that Americans have to bow, not necessarily out of tradition or respect, but out of the sheer physics of having to shake the other person's hand.

It become a bow many times. I know I've done that on several occasions where the handshake is combined with a slight bow.

302 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:24:15pm

re: #265 Cato the Elder

Were you alive during the Reagan years?

I do not remember a united country.

The 1984 Presidential Election Results.

"Reagan carried 49 of the 50 states,... Mondale's only electoral votes came from his home state of Minnesota—which he won by fewer than 3,800 votes..."

Looked pretty well united to me.

303 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:24:22pm

re: #289 sattv4u2

Satt, you are amusing me with your pathetic dodges. She did neither for obvious reasons. Even if she wanted to throw water in his face she wouldn't.

Now how about you stop thinking that your sophomoric word games make you look less stupid or sexist.

Let's try again...

Since back-rubs are considered intimate touch by about 99% of the species without having to have it explained to them, like it seems to have to be painstakingly explained to you, and not just by me,

If indeed that is true,

Then is it ok to go and give an unsolicited one to a woman you are not on very friendly terms with?

304 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:24:27pm

I do not love GW Bush. I do not think he deserves ALL of the criticism he gets.

I do not hate BH Obama. I do not think he has earned ALL of the accolades he receives.

305 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:24:36pm

re: #294 recusancy

Reagan got shot. It's amazing what a national tragedy will do to national unity. See 9/11.

Ford was shot at ,,, how'd that next election work out for him?

306 Killgore Trout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:25:06pm

re: #300 tokyobk

My old friend Jake quotes this here anonymous lizard:

[Link: blogs.abcnews.com...]

Is that you? Nice!

307 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:25:13pm

Tales of the obvious part 1,176:

Wingnuts are claiming that Obama is super-embarrassing. This automatically invites comparisons with the public performance of other presidents especially those favoured by those wingnuts. Hence Bush popping up in discussion here.

308 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:25:25pm

re: #293 sattv4u2

other forms of more intimate touch?

Oh for Charlie The Tunas sake. He touched her SHOUDLERS,,,The TOP of her TOTALLY CLOTHED shoulders
He didn;'t give her a naked Tokyo Spa massage

And that is where you prove you are a moron.

So really, put your money where your mouth is. Try that to some woman you meet on the street...

See if the judge agrees.

309 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:25:27pm

re: #305 sattv4u2

Ford was shot at ,,, how'd that next election work out for him?

Oh shit!

I just fell out of my chair I'm laughing so hard.

310 recusancy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:25:42pm

re: #305 sattv4u2

Ford was shot at ,,, how'd that next election work out for him?

Not shot.

311 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:26:05pm

re: #283 Sharmuta

Really?

Really. Reagan got 58.8% of the popular vote to Mondale's 40.6%. A landslide by any standards, but still plenty of polarization there.

312 rwmofo  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:26:08pm

re: #269 Sharmuta

WTF does Bush have to do with this? Lord knows if this was a thread critical of Republicans some progressives around here would pitch a fit to get it back on topic. This isn't about Bush's gaffes, which despite comments on this thread to the contrary, no one is defending.

OK, let's get back to criticizing Obama.

/

313 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:26:08pm

re: #293 sattv4u2

other forms of more intimate touch?

Oh for Charlie The Tunas sake. He touched her SHOUDLERS,,,The TOP of her TOTALLY CLOTHED shoulders
He didn;'t give her a naked Tokyo Spa massage

sigh, well you have worn me down, I will never again think a dude has crossed that personal space line or get an ick feel when he starts to give me an un-solicited shoulder rub.

314 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:26:27pm

re: #305 sattv4u2

Ford was shot at ,,, how'd that next election work out for him?

*Applause*

315 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:26:34pm

re: #307 Jimmah

Tales of the obvious part 1,176:

Wingnuts are claiming that Obama is super-embarrassing. This automatically invites comparisons with the public performance of other presidents especially those favoured by those wingnuts. Hence Bush popping up in discussion here.

Shhh, the hate being pots when they call us kettles black...

316 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:26:37pm

re: #307 Jimmah

Tales of the obvious part 1,176:

Wingnuts are claiming that Obama is super-embarrassing. This automatically invites comparisons with the public performance of other presidents especially those favoured by those wingnuts. Hence Bush popping up in discussion here.

Yeah because lefties never pull the 'he did it too' card.

Pathetic.

317 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:26:47pm

re: #306 Killgore Trout

Is that you? Nice!

Yes.

318 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:27:14pm

re: #311 Cato the Elder

Really. Reagan got 58.8% of the popular vote to Mondale's 40.6%. A landslide by any standards, but still plenty of polarization there.

A nearly 60/40 split and you want to call Racer X's comments laughable?

319 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:27:15pm

re: #269 Sharmuta

WTF does Bush have to do with this? Lord knows if this was a thread critical of Republicans some progressives around here would pitch a fit to get it back on topic. This isn't about Bush's gaffes, which despite comments on this thread to the contrary, no one is defending.

Seems to be acceptable to change the topic from President Obama to President Bush, but not acceptable ever to change the topic from President Bush to President Obama.

320 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:27:38pm

re: #313 webevintage

sigh, well you have worn me down, I will never again think a dude has crossed that personal space line or get an ick feel when he starts to give me an un-solicited shoulder rub.

That was too subtle for him. I doubt he'll get it. Try a more direct approach.

321 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:27:42pm

re: #278 Racer X

My rememberrer works fine. Yes there was controversy and he had his detractors. Shit got done.

Shit indeed.

Can you say "selling arms to the mullahs to finance an illegal personal war in Central America"?

Thought not.

322 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:27:47pm

re: #300 tokyobk

My old friend Jake quotes this here anonymous lizard:

[Link: blogs.abcnews.com...]

Hey! I posted the Nixon bow last night. :)

323 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:28:17pm

re: #319 reine.de.tout

Seems to be acceptable to change the topic from President Obama to President Bush, but not acceptable ever to change the topic from President Bush to President Obama.

*Bows*

324 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:28:59pm

re: #303 ludwigvanquixote

Then is it ok to go and give an unsolicited one to a woman you are not on very friendly terms with?

NO ,,

But too bad at the time Merkel and Bush were NOT TOTAL strangers,,, they WERE on "freindly terms' ,, and worked together on world events And again, theres a REASON that the video cuts off!((shhh,,, BDS)

325 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:29:19pm

re: #316 Racer X

Yeah because lefties never pull the 'he did it too' card.

Pathetic.

NO, actually, you would only have a complaint if there was a fair comparison. The reality is that in world wide and most American perception, bush actually was a class one, social F* up, while his former lovers are trying to paint Obama, who is not, that way.

326 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:29:34pm

re: #321 Cato the Elder

Shit indeed.

Can you say "selling arms to the mullahs to finance an illegal personal war in Central America"?

Thought not.

I never said the man was perfect. I said he got shit done.

Berlin Wall?

Cold War?

Trivial.

327 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:29:37pm

re: #319 reine.de.tout

Seems to be acceptable to change the topic from President Obama to President Bush, but not acceptable ever to change the topic from President Bush to President Obama.

sheeet, that was O's whole campaign...

328 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:29:45pm

re: #313 webevintage

sigh, well you have worn me down, I will never again think a dude has crossed that personal space line or get an ick feel when he starts to give me an un-solicited shoulder rub.

I don't understand why the testimony of actual woman to whom this has happened, objecting to this is being ignored.

/oh wait, I do.

329 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:30:00pm
330 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:30:03pm

re: #319 reine.de.tout

Seems to be acceptable to change the topic from President Obama to President Bush, but not acceptable ever to change the topic from President Bush to President Obama.

Or any republican, not just Bush. I believe it's called "double standard".

331 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:30:26pm

re: #244 recusancy

Do you give your gay co-workers shoulder rubs? That's what we're talking about here.

Yes, it's what "we" seem to be talking about; but the thread began as a topic about President Obama.

I seem to recall many folks here getting much grief when there have been topics critical of conservatives and people try to change the topic to criticism of liberals.

I'm at loss to understand why it seems to be OK to take a topic about a Democrat and turn it into a thread on Republicans.

332 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:30:31pm

re: #329 Gus 802

Eisenhower flipping the sekrit bird.

//

I'm so using that one for FBV!

333 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:31:10pm

re: #332 Sharmuta

I'm so using that one for FBV!

Like it? There was another one but this one is the best.

334 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:31:16pm

re: #313 webevintage

sigh, well you have worn me down, I will never again think a dude has crossed that personal space line or get an ick feel when he starts to give me an un-solicited shoulder rub.

Thats your perogative which IF I worked with you I would respect. But as I've stated I've been blessed working with women that after we have established freindship THEY see nothing wrong with it

335 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:31:19pm

re: #293 sattv4u2

other forms of more intimate touch?

Oh for Charlie The Tunas sake. He touched her SHOUDLERS,,,The TOP of her TOTALLY CLOTHED shoulders
He didn;'t give her a naked Tokyo Spa massage

Yes, and if I had been the Chancellor of Germany, I'd have reacted the same way she did. Would I have gone to war over it? No. Would I have made it clear that was not comfortable for me? Yep.

336 dugmartsch  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:31:23pm

re: #262 Racer X

Love him or hate him, Reagan got shit done. He did not polarize the country.

Do you think that having to preface your thought that people might have hated him undercuts your thesis that he wasn't polarizing?

337 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:31:35pm

re: #325 ludwigvanquixote

NO, actually, you would only have a complaint if there was a fair comparison. The reality is that in world wide and most American perception, bush actually was a class one, social F* up, while his former lovers are trying to paint Obama, who is not, that way.

My complaint was based on the "so and so' bowed too retort. Jimmah walked right into it. Look upthread and tell me it wasn't brought up.

338 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:32:25pm

re: #316 Racer X

Yeah because lefties never pull the 'he did it too' card.

Pathetic.

Well, you are talking to a lefty who was never shy to point out and mock BDS (as opposed to legitimate criticism) from some quarters of the left. Now it is the right's turn to be mocked for their ODS, which IMO is more widespread and more delusional than BDS ever was. And this is after less than a year in office. God knows what depths they will plumb in the next seven.

339 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:32:33pm

re: #40 iceweasel

I had to step away for a while... Belatedly- I think some folks just play the tit for tat game at least since Clinton. The opposition politics are wing-nutty rather than true and effective. Emotional rather than rational. Most of us here could easily work up a bullet point list of rational criticisms of Obama or his policies. Some of us here would have opposite critiques of course.

Rational over emotional. That's the thing to get back into political discourse.

340 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:32:44pm

re: #330 Sharmuta

Or any republican, not just Bush. I believe it's called "double standard".

Correct.

And you know what else. We all do it. There, I said it.

341 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:32:55pm

re: #330 Sharmuta

Or any republican, not just Bush. I believe it's called "double standard".

You are right there is one at work here.

The righties make false accusations about Obama that were alas true about Bush.

Bush bowed to other dignitaries too... And yet, no outrage...

Bush acted like a total cad with Merckel, and yet there was the nontroversy with looking at the Brazillian girl.

You just don't like the hypocrisy being pointed out.

342 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:33:03pm

re: #302 rwmofo

OK. The whole country loved Reagan, and Obama is a loser for failing to inspire the same unified adoration.

Can we talk about something else now?

343 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:33:31pm

re: #318 Sharmuta

A nearly 60/40 split and you want to call Racer X's comments laughable?

Yes. The forty percent who didn't vote for The Great Prevaricator detested him. If that's not polarization, I never saw an ice cap in my life.

344 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:33:42pm

re: #334 sattv4u2

Thats your perogative which IF I worked with you I would respect. But as I've stated I've been blessed working with women that after we have established freindship THEY see nothing wrong with it

Ahh yes, an established friendship, which you assume Merckel and Bush had to the extent that she would be ok with that. And yet, she clearly wan't.

345 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:33:50pm

re: #308 ludwigvanquixote


Ggeeez Loiuis

Try that to some woman you meet on the street...


You DO know Bush and Merkel knew each other BEFORE that day, right??

346 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:33:52pm

re: #336 dugmartsch

Do you think that having to preface your thought that people might have hated him undercuts your thesis that he wasn't polarizing?

100 people. 7 hate you. 93 love you.

Polarized?

347 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:34:00pm

re: #344 ludwigvanquixote

PIMF

Ahh yes, an established friendship, which you assume Merckel and Bush had to the extent that she would be ok with that. And yet, she clearly wasn't.

348 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:34:14pm

OT: Dan Riehl: Still a Racist, Now a Homophobic One as Well

Last month, I documented Dan Riehl's reaction to the perceived threat posed to him by, in his words, "pretty young, not that big [black] kids" who never confronted him. He responded, as conservatives of his stripe do, with some juvenile homophobic "humor." Point being, because I'm not inclined to give demonstrably puerile racists the benefit of the doubt, you can imagine my reaction when I read the following in his recent post about ACORN:

Breitbart's video busts told us what they do best. The pathetic part in all this is that they were not just allowed, but encouraged to run wild on taxpayer funding by corrupt liberals, including Obama. They should all hang together if you ask me. How long will it be before corrupt Democrats find a way to back door them the money? I bet they're accustomed to the back door. Maybe Barney Frank should spearhead the effort?

In the two short sentences I emphasized, Riehl manages to 1) invoke the language of lynching against the first black President and a predominantly black organization, and 2) equate illegal activity with the sexual practices of homosexual men. He will protest that the latter doesn't make him a homophobe (despite the overt association of homosexual sex with a criminal act) any more than his call for a metaphorical posse to host a metaphorical lynching is evidence of racism. He will be wrong: the fact that the first metaphor that occurs to him when criticizing blacks is a hanging party tells us that when he disagrees with blacks, he couches his disagreement in terms of stretched necks and strangled bodies. People for whom that is an instinctive response are people who are racists. Therefore ...

349 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:34:34pm

re: #344 ludwigvanquixote

Ahh yes, an established friendship, which you assume Merckel and Bush had to the extent that she would be ok with that. And yet, she clearly wan't.

When did she file the harrassment suit?

350 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:35:06pm

Bush did bow to other dignitaries, but not as a follow up to his apologies tour...

351 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:35:09pm

re: #322 Gus 802

Hey! I posted the Nixon bow last night. :)

It may be that I saw it here first as I read LGF every day.
I also said the same basic things here on this and the earlier threads.
In any case, thats why I like this place!

352 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:35:20pm

re: #324 sattv4u2

Then is it ok to go and give an unsolicited one to a woman you are not on very friendly terms with?

NO ,,

But too bad at the time Merkel and Bush were NOT TOTAL strangers,,, they WERE on "freindly terms' ,, and worked together on world events And again, theres a REASON that the video cuts off!((shhh,,, BDS)

Really? You know this? There's footage of Merkel rubbing Bush's feet? What?

353 spinmore  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:35:47pm

How dare he touch her that way . . . he should have offered her a cigar

354 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:36:00pm

re: #349 sattv4u2

When did she file the harrassment suit?

Uh-huh, pathetic.

355 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:36:04pm

re: #341 ludwigvanquixote

You are right there is one at work here.

The righties make false accusations about Obama that were alas true about Bush.

Bush bowed to other dignitaries too... And yet, no outrage...

Bush acted like a total cad with Merckel, and yet there was the nontroversy with looking at the Brazillian girl.

You just don't like the hypocrisy being pointed out.

No- I don't appreciate the Bush did faux pas too argument when others rail against such fallacies on other threads, but it's perfectly fine to use such a fallacy here so you can all get your BDS on. Knock yourselves out, but what's on full display here it the willingness of some to use logical fallacies when it suits their purpose and condemn them when it doesn't.

356 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:36:32pm

re: #18 Conservative Moonbat

and will report back to his secret Parliament...

357 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:36:49pm

re: #351 tokyobk

It may be that I saw it here first as I read LGF every day.
I also said the same basic things here on this and the earlier threads.
In any case, thats why I like this place!

Cool. Sometimes I go off on a tangent and start searching for relevant information. Found the Nixon-Hirohito meeting in Alaska last night. Couldn't find a video however which would have been nice.

358 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:36:50pm

re: #342 SanFranciscoZionist

We're filling the gap now between "inherited mess" and the unknown future effects of decisions taken by the current administration, by talking about previous gaffes and nontroversy. I'm uneasy about the gathering storm, but don't know where it will hit.

359 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:37:04pm

re: #335 SanFranciscoZionist

Yes, and if I had been the Chancellor of Germany, I'd have reacted the same way she did. Would I have gone to war over it? No. Would I have made it clear that was not comfortable for me? Yep.

Please, also note, he got the picture and did not try it again, which speaks to Mr. Bush's ability to realize when he had misgaged a social situation.

360 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:37:11pm

Ah well ,,, gotta get ready to go out with the family and freinds and RUB SOME SHOULDERS!!!

361 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:37:46pm

re: #346 Racer X

100 people. 7 40 hate you. 93 60 love you.

Polarized? Polarized!

Fixed that for you.

362 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:37:52pm

re: #341 ludwigvanquixote

You are right there is one at work here.

The righties make false accusations about Obama that were alas true about Bush.

Bush bowed to other dignitaries too... And yet, no outrage...

Bush acted like a total cad with Merckel, and yet there was the nontroversy with looking at the Brazillian girl.

You just don't like the hypocrisy being pointed out.

And the Obama administrations embarrassing choice of gifts for visiting dignitaries - another Obama "nontroversy".

Whereas every mistake Bush made is a glaring example of him being a cad.

Sorry - I'm seeing the hypocrisy in you, not Sharmuta.

363 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:38:06pm

re: #337 Racer X

My complaint was based on the "so and so' bowed too retort. Jimmah walked right into it. Look upthread and tell me it wasn't brought up.

Sigh. My point in bringing up Bush's bowing wasn't to say there was anything wrong with it - it was simply to point out that it's normal behaviour for any president.

364 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:38:24pm

re: #305 sattv4u2

I thought the gun jammed and no shot was fired? How much popular sympathy should that garner compared to wounded while on duty?

365 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:38:40pm

re: #355 Sharmuta

No- I don't appreciate the Bush did faux pas too argument when others rail against such fallacies on other threads, but it's perfectly fine to use such a fallacy here so you can all get your BDS on. Knock yourselves out, but what's on full display here it the willingness of some to use logical fallacies when it suits their purpose and condemn them when it doesn't.

Quoting this - perfectly stated.

366 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:38:56pm

You know during the Bush years, all one ever heard (in foreign countries) was about "AmeriKKKa's Arrogance." That was the meme. "AmericKa is Arrogant." This meme now seems to be replaced with "AmeriKKKa is Groveling" and "Amerika iz Weak." (everyone now figures the U.S. is weak -- but, as I've noted elsewhere, this could be a good thing...Let others do the leading...)

367 Obdicut  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:39:08pm

re: #349 sattv4u2

When did she file the harrassment suit?

Do you want every woman who feels a man was somewhat boorish to fire a harassment suit?

I'm damn glad that most women, and most people, do not litigate even when, by the letter of the law, they could.

I have no problem with Obama bowing to the Emperor of Japan, or to Michelle, or to me, if he feels like it.

I don't like him bowing to the Saudi King because i don't like us having the diplomatic relationship with the Saudis that we do. I don't like the Empire State Building being China-Red because I don't like what our diplomatic relationship is with China.

I don't care about the symbols, I care about the actuals. I don't understand why those who criticize Obama go for insignificant, high-school-sniggering trivialities like "OMG he totally flipped Hillary off" or 'Look at him bow like a subservient black man LOL' instead of, "Obama's bow reminds me that we have strong diplomatic ties with the Saudis, who have religious police who beat women. That shit isn't cool."

368 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:39:25pm

I don't like Obama's policies. I don't like the direction our country is headed under his Presidency.

I do not hate the man.

I could care less about a bow.

I prefer smaller government; I prefer more emphasis on personal responsibility. I prefer lower taxes. I would like to see the people who actually create jobs - business - be given incentive to do so.

Does this make me bad?

369 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:39:51pm

re: #364 Rightwingconspirator

I thought the gun jammed and no shot was fired? How much popular sympathy should that garner compared to wounded while on duty?

I think she forgot to thumb down the saftey...

370 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:41:22pm

re: #368 Racer X

I don't know..Is there room for your kind in AmeriKKKa? (could always immigrate to Canada, you know...)

371 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:41:25pm

re: #355 Sharmuta

No- I don't appreciate the Bush did faux pas too argument when others rail against such fallacies on other threads, but it's perfectly fine to use such a fallacy here so you can all get your BDS on. Knock yourselves out, but what's on full display here it the willingness of some to use logical fallacies when it suits their purpose and condemn them when it doesn't.

Sharm, you know I like you. I understand why you feel that way.

However to my point of view, bringing up Bush's very real gaffs, when the righties bring up fake outrage about Obama, is exactly the same thing as enjoying a family first ohh so righteous GOP person talk about his mistress.

It is just the worst hypocrisy.

I made it pretty clear that I do not wholeheartedly support everything about Obama. If there is a substantive complaint to be made about him, I will join in thoughtfully, and I might even agree.

However, the right is living in a dream world about W. The right is living in such a dream world, some apparently even see nothing wrong with unsolicited back rubs. So no, they get to get hoist on their own hateful petards.

And anyone who want's to bitch about the left and negative stereotypes, two words... Carl Rove.

372 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:41:46pm

re: #349 sattv4u2

When did she file the harrassment suit?

Yes, that was perfectly possible for one head of state to do to another, desireable, and the only possible way for a woman to indicate she doesn't feel comfortable with being touched.

//Angela Merkel did exactly what Miss Manners says to do in such a sitation. You slightly overreact, emphasizing how startled you were. You then behave graciously.

This was not a big deal, but pretending the look on her face is anything but alarmed isn't possible for me.

373 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:41:57pm

re: #368 Racer X

If that's bad count me in as just as bad.

374 Obdicut  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:42:06pm

re: #368
Racer X


I could care less about a bow.


re: #110 Racer X

Totally agree. I wish Obama would stop doing it.

And the 'it' was making a public ass out of himself.

So which is it? Do you care, or do you wish he'd stop doing it?

375 spinmore  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:42:51pm

re: #368 Racer X
Depends on who you talk to.
I've got your back (and no, I won't rub your shoulders)

376 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:43:05pm

re: #364 Rightwingconspirator

re: #369 brookly red

There wasn;'t a bullet in the gun that Squeeky Fromme used
Sara Moores fired her gun but a bystander knocked her arm at the same time and the bullet missed Ford

(hmmm,, was that inapproriate touching by the bystander??))
//

377 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:43:08pm

re: #374 Obdicut

And the 'it' was making a public ass out of himself.

So which is it? Do you care, or do you wish he'd stop doing it?

I could care less about a bow.

I think Obama has made an ass out of himself without any bow.

378 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:43:22pm

re: #371 ludwigvanquixote

Sharm, you know I like you.

I utterly reject this argument again, and I've told you to stop it. I will not allow you to make appeals to my emotions and I'm not reading another word of your comment.

379 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:43:33pm

re: #357 Gus 802

Cool. Sometimes I go off on a tangent and start searching for relevant information. Found the Nixon-Hirohito meeting in Alaska last night. Couldn't find a video however which would have been nice.

Definitely will be asking you if I cannot find something online (which happens to me alot) !

380 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:43:43pm

re: #376 sattv4u2

Right you are.

381 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:45:31pm

America is jacked up right now. Why does this president need to go around the world and meet with people? Bored at home?

382 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:46:27pm
Sharm, you know I like you.

Some people must think I'm stupid...

383 brookly red  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:46:44pm

re: #381 Racer X

America is jacked up right now. Why does this president need to go around the world and meet with people? Bored at home?

/count your blessings :)

384 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:47:11pm

re: #381 Racer X

yup. cos sticking fingers in the ears and saying "neh neh neh neh theres nothing out there you can't see me"... is a great foreign policy

385 lostlakehiker  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:48:08pm

re: #368 Racer X

I don't like Obama's policies. I don't like the direction our country is headed under his Presidency.

I do not hate the man.

I could care less about a bow.

I prefer smaller government; I prefer more emphasis on personal responsibility. I prefer lower taxes. I would like to see the people who actually create jobs - business - be given incentive to do so.

Does this make me bad?

Even if you had the opposite preferences that wouldn't make you bad. It would just make you wrong.

Being wrong isn't evil. Nobody has sufficient brains to be right all the time. Many people [all?] have blind spots or ide'es fixe that make them wrong from time to time even when they're plenty smart enough to figure out the issue and come to the right conclusion.

386 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:48:45pm

re: #382 Sharmuta

Some people must think I'm stupid...

[Video]

You mean if I say "you know I like you" that doesn't IMMEDIATLY change your view on a topic to match the opposing one that I have !?!?!?!

//

387 talon_262  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:48:50pm

re: #93 BSM ENGINEER

My father fought on Saipan. He was so angered by the bow of an American President to an Emperor of a the country he fought against, he stopped speaking and went to bed.

When The President goes overseas he represents America. The argument that this is just a tradition does not square with me. We do not grovel at the feet of our betters as those in totalitarian regimes do, as is their "tradition"! We are the US! I fought in two wars to free others from "deference" to others that was unwarranted. This is a spit in the eye to those of us who believe that all are equal and saw our brothers die to prove it.

Damn.

While I certainly appreciate your father's service, World War II has been over for almost 65 years now, so there's no rational reason for either him or you to be apoplectic over President Obama respectfully bowing to Emperor Akihito (never mind the fact that Japan has become one of our best and most trusted [democratic] allies since they were defeated by us in WWII).

This wasn't a show of "deference", this was standard-issue diplomacy and respect for one's host.

388 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:49:12pm

I'm going to say that we could should rename Bush Derangement Syndrome as Obesessive Rear View Mirror Syndrome, which of course will work out for late shots at Bill Clinton.

Today we have a current government to watch and evaluate or discuss. Enough about past Presidents. Thos topic is about a false claim on protocol. The claim about Presidents never bowing. Apart from showing how latter day false this is, all the Presidential bows are nontroversial.

389 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:49:42pm

re: #386 sattv4u2

It's downright downdingable.

390 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:49:58pm

re: #378 Sharmuta

I utterly reject this argument again, and I've told you to stop it. I will not allow you to make appeals to my emotions and I'm not reading another word of your comment.

OK, I was trying to say that I am not your foe.

re: #362 reine.de.tout

And the Obama administrations embarrassing choice of gifts for visiting dignitaries - another Obama "nontroversy".

Whereas every mistake Bush made is a glaring example of him being a cad.

Sorry - I'm seeing the hypocrisy in you, not Sharmuta.

OK, so he made some gift choices some would question. How does that compare to Bush and Merckel for example. The only hypocrisy is even beginning to imagine that Obama's gaffs are even playing the same game, let alone in the same league as W's.

Shall we really look at how he was perceived around the world? Care to look at that honestly? The only president in recent memory for a reputation as being as crass and oafish in public as W was LBJ.

391 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:50:54pm

re: #382 Sharmuta

WTF?

I am really not sure what I did to deserve that.

392 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:51:00pm

re: #389 Sharmuta

It's downright downdingable.

dagnabbit!

393 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:52:36pm

re: #384 wozzablog

yup. cos sticking fingers in the ears and saying "neh neh neh neh theres nothing out there you can't see me"... is a great foreign policy

Dude has spent more time way from his office than any other president. Cool? Or is that another thing that makes you go 'huh'?

394 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:53:16pm

re: #392 sattv4u2

Leaving the whole nontroversy aside, are there any openings at your company? It sounds like a nice place to work.

395 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:53:22pm

Dinner time at chez Jimmah-Ice.

BBIAB :)

396 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:53:28pm

re: #384 wozzablog

yup. cos sticking fingers in the ears and saying "neh neh neh neh theres nothing out there you can't see me"... is a great foreign policy

And does he NOT trust Hillary?

397 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:53:30pm

re: #381 Racer X

America is jacked up right now. Why does this president need to go around the world and meet with people? Bored at home?

I don't know...may be because going around the world and meeting with heads of state is what Presidents do?

398 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:53:57pm

re: #390 ludwigvanquixote

It's about the "symbolic import" of the gesture. And, Obama is signaling (I believe deliberately) that the United States will bow (ie, lower itself) to foreign nations and recognize it's lower status. That's what's being signaled. Ok? Now, we can argue, is that a good thing for the U.S? or is that a bad thing? but to suggest that it's somehow not obsequious, is (imo) odd.

399 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:54:22pm

I'm off--enjoy Sunday,lizards.

400 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:54:25pm

re: #397 webevintage

I don't know...may be because going around the world and meeting with heads of state is what Presidents do?

. . . A lot!

401 spinmore  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:54:33pm

re: #393 Racer X

Dude has spent more time way from his office than any other president. Cool? Or is that another thing that makes you go 'huh'?

Guy plays an awful lot of golf (Bush could have never gotten away with that given the state of the State)

402 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:54:38pm

re: #393 Racer X

Dude has spent more time way from his office than any other president. Cool? Or is that another thing that makes you go 'huh'?

Well at least he wasn't loafing at his ranch in Texas...He was actually on a work trip...

Really I will hoist you on your own petard.

403 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:54:39pm

re: #394 Cato the Elder

Leaving the whole nontroversy aside, are there any openings at your company? It sounds like a nice place to work.

Actually, one of the satellite techs at our teleport in Denver just passed away!

404 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:55:02pm

re: #318 Sharmuta

A nearly 60/40 split and you want to call Racer X's comments laughable?

You are in a room with 10 people.

Six of them love you and want you to be their leader.

The other four hate your guts, think you're a bumbling fool, and wish you at the devil.

Are you standing in a united place?

405 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:55:04pm

re: #401 spinmore

Guy plays an awful lot of golf (Bush could have never gotten away with that given the state of the State)

ODS!
ODS!

Alert!

406 Sapient  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:55:07pm

What is common knowledge and gut level understanding of what it means to be an American really shouldn't need to be codified...

In America ALL are created equal, and NO ONE is obliged to stoop before another, or bow because of their blood line. Here we have no royalty and every person stands at equal height and can look another straight in the eye...deferring to no one.

To say throwing that away is a non event...well, speak for yourself.

407 McSpiff  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:55:44pm

The executive is conducting foreign diplomacy? Thats downright unconstitutional!

///

408 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:55:47pm

re: #402 ludwigvanquixote

Really I will hoist you on your own petard.

Thanks for the offer but, homey don't play that.

409 Pass The Moonbaticide  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:56:16pm

re: #393 Racer X
Considering the ruin into which he is leading your country during his short visits to the White House, I would have thought you would want more and prolonged Diplomatic visits.

410 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:56:16pm

re: #398 J.S.

It's about the "symbolic import" of the gesture. And, Obama is signaling (I believe deliberately) that the United States will bow (ie, lower itself) to foreign nations and recognize it's lower status. That's what's being signaled. Ok? Now, we can argue, is that a good thing for the U.S? or is that a bad thing? but to suggest that it's somehow not obsequious, is (imo) odd.

So, pretty much every dignitary from America I know of obeys protocols with foreign dignitaries. It was never seen that way before.

John Adams bowed to King George III for crying out loud.

411 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:56:41pm

re: #403 sattv4u2

Actually, one of the satellite techs at our teleport in Denver just passed away!

Well, I'm sorry to hear that. What do you have to know to be a satellite tech? Does Latin help? ;^)

412 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:57:02pm

re: #406 Sapient

What is common knowledge and gut level understanding of what it means to be an American really shouldn't need to be codified...

In America ALL are created equal, and NO ONE is obliged to stoop before another, or bow because of their blood line. Here we have no royalty and every person stands at equal height and can look another straight in the eye...deferring to no one.

To say throwing that away is a non event...well, speak for yourself.

Why is it throwing that away to be courtesy. When I'm in France I kiss my male friends on both cheeks. In Italy you do it three times (right-left-right) but in the US you wouldn't. So f-ing what?

He nodded his damn head and the Emperor of Japan probably thought he was a nice guy for doing it. It's not like he handed over our missile codes...

413 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:57:07pm

re: #402 ludwigvanquixote

Bush didn't loaf at Crawford. He had quite a few foreign dignitaries meet him there so he was working too. What a crock of crap comment- like the President gets to loaf anywhere he goes.

414 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:57:42pm

re: #393 Racer X

i can't mention Bush and the third of his time in office spent away from - the office - so without being able to mention that - i don't possibly see where this conversation can go ;-)

477 days @ Camp David

490 days @ the ranch

Yup - world diplomacy and leadership. Sux to be Obama.

415 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:58:03pm

re: #390 ludwigvanquixote

OK, so he made some gift choices some would question. How does that compare to Bush and Merckel for example. The only hypocrisy is even beginning to imagine that Obama's gaffs are even playing the same game, let alone in the same league as W's.

Shall we really look at how he was perceived around the world? Care to look at that honestly? The only president in recent memory for a reputation as being as crass and oafish in public as W was LBJ.

LVQ - I don't happen to think that a it is a major requirement of the President of the U.S. that he be liked around the world. I would prefer we have a President who is interested and concerned about the safety and security of this country than have President whose main concern is to be "liked" by people in other countries.

My point is this - and I have been very very careful with this - in any thread critical of conservatives, people have been taken to task, and rightly so, for trying to turn the thread into criticism of liberals with a "oh, but look what LIBERALS did!". I have been very careful not to do that.

But in this thread, it seems to be perfecty acceptable to take a thread about President Obama and turn it into a Bush-bash. And anyone who takes exception to that is labelled a "hypocrite". In my mind, the hypocrites are the ones who are perfectly fine with this turn of events in this thread, but will yell the loudest when it happens the other way around. And some of the ones who dinged down by 362 are some of the ones who have yelled the loudest.

416 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:58:18pm

re: #402 ludwigvanquixote

Well at least he wasn't loafing at his ranch in Texas...He was actually on a work trip...

Really I will hoist you on your own petard.

{sigh}

NO president since Eisenhower "loafed", in the office or on "vacation". It's a 24/7 meatgrinder.

Unless you haven;'t noticed that it ages the occupant about 5 fold

417 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:58:22pm

re: #409 Pass The Moonbaticide


Considering the ruin into which he is leading your country during his short visits to the White House, I would have thought you would want more and prolonged Diplomatic visits.

No.

Because that leaves the door open for Nancy and Harry, who are ten times worse than Obama. No thanks!

I would prefer Obama get back to work here, and do what he said he would do when he was campaigning for the job. Actually DO it, not just continue to campaign about it.

418 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:59:05pm

re: #413 Sharmuta

gmta (416)

This is getting wierd!!!
/

419 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:59:14pm

re: #410 ludwigvanquixote

I've been over this (over and over again) on the thread about Obama's bow to the King of Saudi Arabia. It was a principle introduced after Adam's bow..(look up the other thread).

420 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:59:14pm

re: #414 wozzablog

i can't mention Bush and the third of his time in office spent away from - the office - so without being able to mention that - i don't possibly see where this conversation can go ;-)

477 days @ Camp David

490 days @ the ranch

Yup - world diplomacy and leadership. Sux to be Obama.

The President doesn't get days off- no matter who he is.

421 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 12:59:54pm

I'm not worried about real bows to royalty. I'm more bothered by his political bow to the SEIU. How about that bow?
Or...
SEIU - Service Employees International Union - barack obama
Mar 24, 2009 - Last week, President Obama announced SEIU's Michael Kerr as his nominee for Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management (OASAM)

Or...
[Link: chieforganizer.org...]

422 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:00:24pm

re: #421 Rightwingconspirator

I'm not worried about real bows to royalty. I'm more bothered by his political bow to the SEIU. How about that bow?
Or...
SEIU - Service Employees International Union - barack obama
Mar 24, 2009 - Last week, President Obama announced SEIU's Michael Kerr as his nominee for Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management (OASAM)

Or...
[Link: chieforganizer.org...]

I'm with you on that one!

423 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:00:30pm

re: #417 Racer X

he can't work on Airforce One?... or in any hotel room?... or it's not working when trying to shore up the $ abroad, or it's not working when trying to shape trade relations, or get extra troops from NATO into Afghanistan, or or or or...

424 Racer X  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:01:41pm

Well its been fun.

425 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:01:56pm

re: #413 Sharmuta

re: #418 sattv4u2

gmta (416)

This is getting wierd!!!
/


Oh ,, WAIT ,, it's because I said "you know I like you ,,, but ,,"

huh !

426 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:02:10pm

re: #420 Sharmuta

I didn't say he wasn't working - i said he was away from the "office".
RacerX's choice of terminology.

Also see my 423.

427 webevintage  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:02:26pm

For your viewing pleasure, 100 Greatest Quotes from The Wire

Here be spoilers if you are in the middle of or have never seen The Wire and plan on doing so at some point.

428 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:02:36pm

re: #415 reine.de.tout

And that is fair.

I did not bring up Bush on vacation. It was in response to Racer X's comment about Obama being out of the office.

I did not bring up Bush as an ugly American, that was in response to Sharm's comment about Bush.

There are two things going on.

1. All of the nontroversy from the right eventually has to come back into the realm of reality.

2. The real things that Obama has done, are not what the right says, and moreover, given people that they like, are acceptable to an even worse extent.

The point is about hypocrisy.

That is what makes it relevant.

429 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:03:00pm

re: #422 reine.de.tout


Hmmm maybe that upstairs thread is a double meaning-Only with a sense of scale (proportion?) can we sort out real controversies from nontroversies. Anyway I'm going over to that thread.

430 cobdenite  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:03:21pm

I think the right has this completely confused with something known as "Flag Etiquette".

From Wikipedia: "The United States Flag Code outlines certain guidelines for the use, display, and disposal of the flag. For example, the flag should never be dipped to any person or thing, unless it is the ensign responding to a salute from a ship of a foreign nation. (This tradition may come from the 1908 Summer Olympics in London, where countries were asked to dip their flag to King Edward VII: the American flag bearer did not. Team captain Martin Sheridan is famously quoted as saying "this flag dips to no earthly king", though the true provenance of this quotation is unclear.)"

Note how it says: "this flag dips to no earthly king". The word President is nowhere near this quotation. Since most on the right have probably heard of flag etiquette, they've replaced the word flag with the word president in their minds, and are now frothing away at something that seems obvious, but in fact is not. It's at the tip of our collective memory of public proceedure because it's true... just not for the President.

431 MinisterO  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:04:12pm

re: #93 BSM ENGINEER

My father fought on Saipan. He was so angered by the bow of an American President to an Emperor of a the country he fought against, he stopped speaking and went to bed.

A 65 year old grudge should not dictate policy. No disrespect to your father is intended by that statement.

432 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:04:25pm

re: #425 sattv4u2

re: #418 sattv4u2


Oh ,, WAIT ,, it's because I said "you know I like you ,,, but ,,"

huh !

Perhaps you could give someone a backrub and sort it out...

433 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:04:27pm

re: #415 reine.de.tout

LVQ - I don't happen to think that a it is a major requirement of the President of the U.S. that he be liked around the world. I would prefer we have a President who is interested and concerned about the safety and security of this country than have President whose main concern is to be "liked" by people in other countries.

Why are these things mutually exclusive. EITHER you care about protecting the country OR you are liked around the world. What a crock! You can't seriously believe that dichotomy, can you?

My point is this - and I have been very very careful with this - in any thread critical of conservatives, people have been taken to task, and rightly so, for trying to turn the thread into criticism of liberals with a "oh, but look what LIBERALS did!". I have been very careful not to do that.

But in this thread, it seems to be perfecty acceptable to take a thread about President Obama and turn it into a Bush-bash. And anyone who takes exception to that is labelled a "hypocrite". In my mind, the hypocrites are the ones who are perfectly fine with this turn of events in this thread, but will yell the loudest when it happens the other way around. And some of the ones who dinged down by 362 are some of the ones who have yelled the loudest.

I think the difference here is that people are pointing out not the hypocrisy in action of the right & left in the hypocritical judgment of the punditry on the right & left. It is fair to say that "you are outraged now but were fine with your guy doing it" because it works on the supposition that it was ok for the first guy to be doing it. It was fine for Bush to exhibit culturally appropriate signs of affection to foreign leaders and it fine for Obama as well. The criticism exhibited here that I've seen of the "they did it too" argument is over people's reprehensible behavior, like comparing our leaders to Hitler and general hooliganism.

434 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:05:10pm

re: #428 ludwigvanquixote

And that is fair.

I did not bring up Bush on vacation. It was in response to Racer X's comment about Obama being out of the office.

I did not bring up Bush as an ugly American, that was in response to Sharm's comment about Bush.

There are two things going on.

1. All of the nontroversy from the right eventually has to come back into the realm of reality.

2. The real things that Obama has done, are not what the right says, and moreover, given people that they like, are acceptable to an even worse extent.

The point is about hypocrisy.

That is what makes it relevant.

I agree with the above, but I think you left out one item:

3. All of the nontroversy from the left eventually has to come back into the realm of reality.

435 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:05:42pm

re: #432 ludwigvanquixote

Perhaps you could give someone a backrub and sort it out...

Bend over

436 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:05:47pm

I wasn't the one who first brought up Bush, thankyouverymuch.

437 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:06:05pm

re: #434 reine.de.tout

That's fair too. You are not going to find me defending the PETA types.

438 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:06:47pm

re: #27 Sharmuta

I guess stereotyping people as Ugly Americans is okay if their last name is Bush.

re: #436 Sharmuta

I wasn't the one who first brought up Bush, thankyouverymuch.

Really? Of course you did. That's what started this.

439 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:07:05pm

re: #430 cobdenite

I think the right has this completely confused with something known as "Flag Etiquette".

From Wikipedia: "The United States Flag Code outlines certain guidelines for the use, display, and disposal of the flag. For example, the flag should never be dipped to any person or thing, unless it is the ensign responding to a salute from a ship of a foreign nation. (This tradition may come from the 1908 Summer Olympics in London, where countries were asked to dip their flag to King Edward VII: the American flag bearer did not. Team captain Martin Sheridan is famously quoted as saying "this flag dips to no earthly king", though the true provenance of this quotation is unclear.)"

Note how it says: "this flag dips to no earthly king". The word President is nowhere near this quotation. Since most on the right have probably heard of flag etiquette, they've replaced the word flag with the word president in their minds, and are now frothing away at something that seems obvious, but in fact is not. It's at the tip of our collective memory of public proceedure because it's true... just not for the President.

But the President wears a flag PIN!

I knew it - he is a sekrit subjekt of a forrin leeder...

440 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:09:18pm

re: #438 ludwigvanquixote

Really? Of course you did. That's what started this.

Try again.. I think the #14 comes BEFORE the #27, no??

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

441 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:09:39pm

re: #433 Cineaste

"you are outraged now but were fine with your guy doing it" because it works on the supposition that it was ok for the first guy to be doing it.

The problem with this is that at LGF we weren't okay with Bush doing all of these things. You should perhaps go read the thread where we discussed Bush holding hands with the Saudis, or the Sword Dance thread. Stop lumping LGFers in with the rest of the right as though no one at LGF ever criticized Bush for anything because it's not the truth.

442 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:10:17pm

re: #439 Cineaste

But the President wears a flag PIN!

Which means...which means...when he dips, the flag dips!

Oh my God, we've lost our sovereignty!

443 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:10:53pm

re: #440 sattv4u2

Try again.. I think the #14 comes BEFORE the #27, no??

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Thank you!

444 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:11:28pm

re: #440 sattv4u2

Try again.. I think the #14 comes BEFORE the #27, no??

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

And was I involved with that convo? I thought she was responding to me.

As to you you though, you are still irrelevant.

445 simoom  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:11:33pm

BTW, for anyone genuinely upset by the bow, maybe you'll find some small comfort in that it could have been a whole lot worse :P -- for example watch what the President did before Zod:

446 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:11:46pm

re: #441 Sharmuta

The problem with this is that at LGF we weren't okay with Bush doing all of these things. You should perhaps go read the thread where we discussed Bush holding hands with the Saudis, or the Sword Dance thread. Stop lumping LGFers in with the rest of the right as though no one at LGF ever criticized Bush for anything because it's not the truth.

I was meaning the proverbial "you" not the specific of LGF. I'm not lumping lizards with anyone. I was pointing out that much of the recent discussion of "they did it too" arguments was about justifying reprehensible behavior of the mob. Sorry for any confusion on that one.

447 ludwigvanquixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:11:49pm

re: #443 Sharmuta

Thank you!

Then my apologies, I thought you were responding to me.

448 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:11:55pm

re: #433 Cineaste

I think the difference here is that people are pointing out not the hypocrisy in action of the right & left in the hypocritical judgment of the punditry on the right & left. It is fair to say that "you are outraged now but were fine with your guy doing it" because it works on the supposition that it was ok for the first guy to be doing it. It was fine for Bush to exhibit culturally appropriate signs of affection to foreign leaders and it fine for Obama as well. The criticism exhibited here that I've seen of the "they did it too" argument is over people's reprehensible behavior, like comparing our leaders to Hitler and general hooliganism.

Well - in previous threads, where conservatives have pointed out "well, you were outraged when our guy did X but you're OK with your guy doing it", we have been taken to task for trying to change the subject.

Now you are saying it's OK to do. Sorry - if it's NOT OK to change the subject from criticism of conservatives to criticism of liberals, then it's not OK to change the subject from criticism of liberals to criticism of conservatives. OR, if you are OK with that, I would suggest that is a hypocritical stance - OK for me but not for you. Wouldn't you agree?

As to the "crock" that I believe - It would be nice to have a President who is both concerned about the safety and security of this country AND well-liked around the world. We may have that with Obama, I don't know yet.

But it is NOT an absolute requirement. Given a choice between a Presdient who is well-liked, OR a President who is not well-liked but strong on security - I will choose the person who is strong on security. And you are perfectly entitled to think it's a "crock" - I don't think it is, and we could probably discuss this without resorting to making negative implications about the other person's belief system, but given the tone of your response, I'm not sure you want to.

449 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:12:05pm

re: #438 ludwigvanquixote

Really? Of course you did. That's what started this.

See comment #14.

450 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:12:53pm

re: #441 Sharmuta

Stop lumping LGFers in with the rest of the right [...]

Messed with that for you.

451 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:13:14pm

re: #442 Cato the Elder

Which means...which means...when he dips, the flag dips!

Oh my God, we've lost our sovereignty!

Dammit, time to brush up on the lyrics to the Kimigayo.

452 sattv4u2  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:14:31pm

re: #444 ludwigvanquixote

And was I involved with that convo? I thought she was responding to me.

As to you you though, you are still irrelevant.

Yet you keep up a conversation with an "irrelevancy"

I'm not sure what thats called, but I bet it's hard to spell. Probably has one of those silent "P"s in it!

453 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:15:45pm

re: #442 Cato the Elder

well, I don't think it signals a loss of sovereignty. It simply means that Americans are of a lower status when it comes to the Grand and Great Nations of the World, such as China, Japan, India, etc.

454 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:17:06pm

re: #449 jaunte

I just did. I had missed that one and I thought that Sharm was replying to m comment.

I have already apologized.

455 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:17:23pm

re: #453 J.S.

well, I don't think it signals a loss of sovereignty. It simply means that Americans are of a lower status when it comes to the Grand and Great Nations of the World, such as China, Japan, India, etc.

Oh, bullshit.

456 Decatur Deb  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:17:57pm

re: #450 Cato the Elder

Messed with that for you.

For some reason, I rank-order the blogs I read in a perceived right-left
order. I've moved LGF centerward about 3 times this year.

457 talon_262  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:18:20pm

re: #453 J.S.

well, I don't think it signals a loss of sovereignty. It simply means that Americans are of a lower status when it comes to the Grand and Great Nations of the World, such as China, Japan, India, etc.

Are you f**king serious with that? Cato was being sarcastic, something I don't think you are trying to be...

458 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:18:47pm

re: #455 Cato the Elder

Pardon moi?

459 Decatur Deb  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:18:48pm

re: #453 J.S.

well, I don't think it signals a loss of sovereignty. It simply means that Americans are of a lower status when it comes to the Grand and Great Nations of the World, such as China, Japan, India, etc.

Yes, but tube socks are $1.89 a dozen.

460 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:19:02pm

re: #453 J.S.

well, I don't think it signals a loss of sovereignty. It simply means that Americans are of a lower status when it comes to the Grand and Great Nations of the World, such as China, Japan, India, etc.

I have to very strongly disagree. There is a difference between showing the properly expected protocols for a given culture and making America secondary. The Chinese do everything we would like them to do in that respect when they visit.

461 Winston Smith, Fox News Moderator  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:20:35pm

re: #410 ludwigvanquixote

So, pretty much every dignitary from America I know of obeys protocols with foreign dignitaries. It was never seen that way before.

John Adams bowed to King George III for crying out loud.

My understanding of protocol is that private citizens of the United States do not bow to foreign dignitaries but that public officials can when outside the United States and acting in an official capacity. In some cultures (including some in the west) it is customary for a guest to bow to the host, which is probably why Eisenhower bowed to the president of France.
In terms of strict protocol (formal seating arrangements etc.) , the President of the United States outranks almost all foreign dignitaries because the president is both head of state and head of government, while most foreign monarchs are merely heads of state. In the UK, private citizens definitely do not bow to the monarch unless they are subjects.
Adams's bow to George III was essentially an acknowledgment that the meeting was on the king's turf and that Adams was acting in diplomatic capacity. It obviously was not a gesture of fealty or subordination.
In Obama's case, it would be a gesture of gracious acknowledgment, since (a.) he outranks the emperor (b.) he is a guest of the emperor and (c.) he is on official business.

462 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:21:51pm

re: #461 Shiplord Kirel

My understanding of protocol is that private citizens of the United States do not bow to foreign dignitaries but that public officials can when outside the United States and acting in an official capacity. In some cultures (including some in the west) it is customary for a guest to bow to the host, which is probably why Eisenhower bowed to the president of France.
In terms of strict protocol (formal seating arrangements etc.) , the President of the United States outranks almost all foreign dignitaries because the president is both head of state and head of government, while most foreign monarchs are merely heads of state. In the UK, private citizens definitely do not bow to the monarch unless they are subjects.
Adams's bow to George III was essentially an acknowledgment that the meeting was on the king's turf and that Adams was acting in diplomatic capacity. It obviously was not a gesture of fealty or subordination.
In Obama's case, it would be a gesture of gracious acknowledgment, since (a.) he outranks the emperor (b.) he is a guest of the emperor and (c.) he is on official business.

In other words, something perfectly legitimate to do, that does not mean he is marking the nation as secondary.

463 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:22:25pm

re: #415 reine.de.tout

My point is this - and I have been very very careful with this - in any thread critical of conservatives, people have been taken to task, and rightly so, for trying to turn the thread into criticism of liberals with a "oh, but look what LIBERALS did!". I have been very careful not to do that.

But in this thread, it seems to be perfecty acceptable to take a thread about President Obama and turn it into a Bush-bash. And anyone who takes exception to that is labelled a "hypocrite". In my mind, the hypocrites are the ones who are perfectly fine with this turn of events in this thread, but will yell the loudest when it happens the other way around. And some of the ones who dinged down by 362 are some of the ones who have yelled the loudest.

Nonsense. The story Charles posted here is about the ridiculousness of the wingnutsphere's reaction to Obama's bowing to the Japanese leader. Some inclusing myself have highlighted that ridiculousness by pointing out that other presidents, including Bush have also bowed to world leaders. This is not as you mischaracterize it, an inversion of "oh, but look what LIBERALS did!" . The point of this is to show that such behaviour is normal for a POTUS, and does not merit the wingnut outrage we are seeing.

464 Winston Smith, Fox News Moderator  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:23:22pm

re: #462 LudwigVanQuixote

In other words, something perfectly legitimate to do, that does not mean he is marking the nation as secondary.

Exactly that. Eisenhower, Bush, and (as you point out) John Adams did likewise.

465 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:25:02pm
Some inclusing myself have highlighted that ridiculousness by pointing out that other presidents, including Bush have also bowed to world leaders

That wasn't what was said at all, but this was:

Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!". Then he'd have marched straight out the room again (after figuring out where the door was, of course)

That's hardly pointing out that Bush bowed too.

466 talon_262  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:25:07pm

re: #461 Shiplord Kirel

My understanding of protocol is that private citizens of the United States do not bow to foreign dignitaries but that public officials can when outside the United States and acting in an official capacity. In some cultures (including some in the west) it is customary for a guest to bow to the host, which is probably why Eisenhower bowed to the president of France.
In terms of strict protocol (formal seating arrangements etc.) , the President of the United States outranks almost all foreign dignitaries because the president is both head of state and head of government, while most foreign monarchs are merely heads of state. In the UK, private citizens definitely do not bow to the monarch unless they are subjects.
Adams's bow to George III was essentially an acknowledgment that the meeting was on the king's turf and that Adams was acting in diplomatic capacity. It obviously was not a gesture of fealty or subordination.
In Obama's case, it would be a gesture of gracious acknowledgment, since (a.) he outranks the emperor (b.) he is a guest of the emperor and (c.) he is on official business.

I regret that I only have one upding to give!

467 Decatur Deb  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:26:03pm

There has to be a pun that will put an end to this bowing and scrapping.

468 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:29:06pm

re: #467 Decatur Deb

so you want to tie up the conversation about bows...

469 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:30:05pm

re: #460 LudwigVanQuixote

As if we don't know who holds the purse strings...

470 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:30:19pm

re: #468 wozzablog

that - ladies and gents - is the sound of the barrel being scraped...

471 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:30:20pm

I present to you, the Reagan bow.

//

472 ausador  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:31:04pm

re: #406 Sapient

What is common knowledge and gut level understanding of what it means to be an American really shouldn't need to be codified...

In America ALL are created equal, and NO ONE is obliged to stoop before another, or bow because of their blood line. Here we have no royalty and every person stands at equal height and can look another straight in the eye...deferring to no one.

To say throwing that away is a non event...well, speak for yourself.

Wow, I hadn't realized it was so serious, guess the only thing left to do is panic!

473 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:36:00pm

re: #463 Jimmah

Nonsense. The story Charles posted here is about the ridiculousness of the wingnutsphere's reaction to Obama's bowing to the Japanese leader. Some inclusing myself have highlighted that ridiculousness by pointing out that other presidents, including Bush have also bowed to world leaders. This is not as you mischaracterize it, an inversion of "oh, but look what LIBERALS did!" . The point of this is to show that such behaviour is normal for a POTUS, and does not merit the wingnut outrage we are seeing.

I agree this is a complete nontroversy, this "bow" of Obama's.

And yes, Bush did it too, as have other Presidents. And no, it does NOT merit the wingnut outrage we are seeing.

What I was addressing in my comment was that comments in this thread have gone beyond "Bush also did it", to an out and out Bush-Bashing Fest.

Conservative commenters have been taken to task when they've tried to change the thread topic from criticism of conservatives to criticism of liberals; and I think it is JUST as wrong when the liberals here take a thread topic about the current President and turn it into a full-out festival of bashing of the previous President.

474 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:36:31pm

re: #465 Sharmuta

That's hardly pointing out that Bush bowed too.

I thought it was obvious I was parodying the wingnut view with that post. As everyone knows, Bush did not behave like that, but going by the wingnut reaction to Obama's bow, one might think that he had, and that that was the proper way for a POTUS to behave. I clarified where I was coming from in post 60, for the benefit of those who seemed to have trouble understanding this : [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

And again in 90 :

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

But it seems some people don't want to know...

475 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:41:00pm

re: #474 Jimmah

Wingnuts, brooo!

/

476 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:42:46pm

re: #474 Jimmah

one might think that he had, and that that was the proper way for a POTUS to behave.

Except that I doubt even the kookiest of kooks would agree the President should be punching world leaders in the face.

What I actually think you were doing with that #14 was trolling for a fight with the conservatives on this board.

477 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:42:59pm

re: #473 reine.de.tout

What I was addressing in my comment was that comments in this thread have gone beyond "Bush also did it", to an out and out Bush-Bashing Fest.

I am not seeing any such outright Bush bashing fest. Couple of snarky comments and a few legitimate criticisms, but nothing one might call BDS - unless we are talking about the kind of BDS whereby any criticism of Bush is taken to be Bush criticism.

478 HappyWarrior  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:44:31pm

And if he didn't bow the same nutjobs who are crucifying him in this situation would be calling him a narcissist and disrespectful of world leaders. There is literally nothing Obama can do that will please these people. It's understandable that they were upset about the Saudis. Hell, I think the House of Saud is pardon the pun royally fucked up but it's not as if he was the first president to bow or have a smile for the Saudi kings.

479 claire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:45:54pm

Bowing is tricky in Japan. I think Obama is trying too hard to be an uber-hip world citizen, oh, so sensitive to the natives ways that he made a small faux-pas, but it's not like it's fatal. He should have taken the lead from the host, bowing about the same degree for the same amount of time. The inferior bow is deeper than the superior bow, generally. He should have kept his arms at his sides, unless during the handshake, the other guy started bowing, then he should have matched it. He should have limited the bend to a polite 15-20 degrees. 45 degrees is quite a formal bow and a bit embarassing that it wasn't returned. (Or was it?)

And as far as Merkel- Ludwig- you've moved the goal-posts al over the place. A shoulder-scrunch is described as an "intimate back-rub" and men should use the "would a stranger on the street like this" as criteria to figure out if it's appropriate between friends.

From my experience in the whole four times anybody has ever come up from behind and given me a shoulder scrunch, I can say that even if I cringed a bit, I never felt like a slap in the face was in order. More like I appreciated the gesture of affection and support- it never felt like a come-on. It was never done by anybody that it wasn't clear from the offset that we were mutually off-limits. You know it's not like Bush went for a boob-grab or an ass-pinch. And I wonder why you would assign sleazy motives toward any physical contact between friends. Do you have some issues with being touched? Seriously, people who can't stand to be touched have some major human interaction issues.

480 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:48:14pm

re: #476 Sharmuta

Except that I doubt even the kookiest of kooks would agree the President should be punching world leaders in the face.

Do you really think that I was literally suggesting that? Wow.

What I actually think you were doing with that #14 was trolling for a fight with the conservatives on this board.

Why should I expect conservatives on LGF - who I presume do not wish to buy into this nontroversy - to be upset by my post? Overall, the reaction to my post seems to have been favourable.

And the only person who has been trolling for an argument has been you.

481 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:51:02pm

re: #480 Xxxmah

I keep forgetting. You're as pure as the driven snow!

482 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:51:35pm

re: #210 prairiefire

It's not a date. It's a WORK relationship. I understand there are completely well intentioned, kind hearted guys out there that have no other motives. It is just so hard for me to tell them apart! I tend to err on the side of caution.

My thoughts exactly. Once, when I was much younger and less wise, I agreed to a co-worker's on the job request to give her a back rub after we had both been on our feet for over 12 hours straight. Next thing I know I'm getting ugly looks from another male co-worker who had an unrequited crush on her, bizarre love triangle I was not at all interested in being a part of ensued. I keep things professional at work at all times, if people want to make friends off the job that's fine, and that's where it needs to remain.

483 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:53:29pm

re: #481 Sharmuta

I keep forgetting. You're as pure as the driven snow!

Full of cogent arguments tonight, aren't you, Sharmuta?

484 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:54:50pm

re: #482 goddamnedfrank

My thoughts exactly. Once, when I was much younger and less wise, I agreed to a co-worker's on the job request to give her a back rub after we had both been on our feet for over 12 hours straight. Next thing I know I'm getting ugly looks from another male co-worker who had an unrequited crush on her, bizarre love triangle I was not at all interested in being a part of ensued. I keep things professional at work at all times, if people want to make friends off the job that's fine, and that's where it needs to remain.

All sorts of bad bizarre behaviour emanates from unrequited obsessional love. Always best to keep a wide berth from it.

485 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:54:56pm

re: #483 Xxxmah

Cogent arguments like "Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!"." [eye roll]

486 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:55:11pm

Based -- purely on speculation -- I have a slight feeling that Obama has deeper respect for powerful men than any other thing. It might help explain his behavior.

He did not bow to Elizabeth II any more than he dedicate his book to his mother who nonetheless sacrificed for him as greatly as his father abandoned him.

A powerful King figure might appeal to him at a gut level.

Just speculating out loud.

487 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:56:36pm

re: #485 Sharmuta

Cogent arguments like "Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!"." [eye roll]

Oh come on - we all knew that was a joke. It's a South Park reference to boot...

488 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:57:16pm

I smell a lot of bullshit in the air. Seems to be coming east to west, I guess. Odd weather pattern.

489 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:57:18pm

re: #485 Sharmuta

Cogent arguments like "Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!"." [eye roll]

Except that was a satirical comment. Interesting how determined you are to ignore that.

490 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:58:46pm

If you don't say what you mean, don't blame the reader for misinterpretation.

491 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:59:08pm

re: #489 Jimmah

We all know what the fuck you meant.

492 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:00:23pm

I don't know why there's such a reluctance to acknowledge Asian (ie, China's) supremacy in Asia...and America's secondary status. As far as I'm concerned, this is a good thing. (The same is true if America proves itself to be weak in the Middle East -- that's a good thing... Personally, the sooner the U.S withdraws from Irag/Afghanistan, the better.)

493 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:01:05pm

re: #490 jaunte

If you don't say what you mean, don't blame the reader for misinterpretation.

And if you don't understand satire, or don't get popular references or allusions, don't blame the write for your failure of understanding.

494 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:01:28pm

re: #493 iceweasel

Gleeb, schnarkly.

495 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:01:36pm

re: #486 tokyobk

Based -- purely on speculation -- I have a slight feeling that Obama has deeper respect for powerful men than any other thing. It might help explain his behavior.

He did not bow to Elizabeth II any more than he dedicate his book to his mother who nonetheless sacrificed for him as greatly as his father abandoned him.

A powerful King figure might appeal to him at a gut level.

Just speculating out loud.

Wasn't Dreams For My Father written & published before his mother passed away?

496 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:02:48pm

re: #493 iceweasel

Unlike you and your guy, most of us deal with the facts and what's written instead of trying to figure out some stupid ass references to some stupid ass movie or show, especially when its clear that that's just a scapegoat for what he was actually trying to do, which was clear as day.

497 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:02:58pm

re: #490 jaunte

If you don't say what you mean, don't blame the reader for misinterpretation.

Nevertheless it seems most people interpreted it just fine, jaunte. It's impossible to make a satirical comment that has a built in guarantee that no-one will misinterpret it. Especially when some people seem so determined to cling to their misinterpretation no matter how many times their error has been pointed out.

498 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:03:33pm

re: #491 TheMatrix31

We all know what the fuck you meant.

I think the satire was obvious. Bush never did those things, it was a satirical alternative to what Obama did that Bush would obviously never have done.

499 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:06:06pm

re: #491 TheMatrix31

We all know what the fuck you meant.

beekiller, bratwurst, goddamnedfrank, iceweasel, mikhailtheplumber, SanFranciscoZionist, webevintage, wozzablog and others knew what the fuck I meant. You and a few others didn't, or didn't want to.

500 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:06:07pm

Satire?

Obama arrives in China for maiden visit

Why go all the way to China when WJC got his in the WH?

501 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:06:31pm

re: #495 Cineaste

Wasn't Dreams For My Father written & published before his mother passed away?

Actually don't know, but I think she was dead. In any case, it is apparent and obvious that it was a huge gap in his life that his father was absent when alive and then dead while he was young.

I wonder what an explanation would be as to why he did not bow to Elizabeth.

502 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:07:04pm

re: #496 TheMatrix31

Unlike you and your guy, most of us deal with the facts and what's written instead of trying to figure out some stupid ass references to some stupid ass movie or show, especially when its clear that that's just a scapegoat for what he was actually trying to do, which was clear as day.

It would seem that thinking and stuff is teh hard./

503 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:07:17pm

re: #501 tokyobk

I wonder what an explanation would be as to why he did not bow to Elizabeth.

She's a woman?

504 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:08:19pm

A) The reference was stupid. Everyone knows he's not going to go punch someone and say America Fuck Yeah, but that's just your usage of that example to symbolize Bush's "Cowboy Diplomacy" that libs like you got so upset about for "the last 8 years".

B) Your quip that "Bush, like a REAL President", poking fun at "those obvious IDIOTS who believe Obama isn't a realll President", must think that Bush is the holy grail of Presidencies, when he's been criticized over and over and over for things that he deservedly (and often undeservedly) needed to be.

C) Your stupid reference to his door gaffe was an obvious, unnecessary bit added on to fuel the fire of your obvious trolling.

You are as transparent as a piece of glass. Your intentions are clear as crystal, and I'm glad that there are people who are going to start calling you out on your, your girl's, and others' bullshit here. It's fucking getting annoying already.

505 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:09:52pm

re: #504 TheMatrix31

Ok, are you being satirical there, or is that really what you're saying?
/ (/?)

506 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:11:23pm

re: #502 Jimmah

Yeah, because I see something for what it clearly is, I clearly am incapable of thinking.

I know people like you, I deal with people like you every single fucking day. I live in Los Angeles. It's like dealing with 8 million you's. All condescending, run-around pricks.

507 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:13:09pm

re: #506 TheMatrix31

And might I also add plastic, insincere, etc.

508 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:13:58pm

re: #501 tokyobk

I wonder what an explanation would be as to why he did not bow to Elizabeth.

Well it's called tradition and custom. In Japan you bend at the waist, in England, British subjects nod their head & shoulders. I don't think there is any footage of anyone bending at the waist when greeting the queen.

509 tokyobk  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:16:12pm

re: #503 Sharmuta

She's a woman?

I actually think that is an issue and thought so in his snarky treatment of Hillary vis-a-vis McCain. But who knows? Politically he is pro-woman so no way to measure his interior thoughts.

510 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:17:44pm

re: #504 TheMatrix31


You are as transparent as a piece of glass. Your intentions are clear as crystal, and I'm glad that there are people who are going to start calling you out on your, your girl's, and others' bullshit here. It's fucking getting annoying already.

What the hell are you talking about, why the hell are you even bringing me into this, and who the fuck do you think you are to demand that 'people be called on their bullshit'?

Lastly, don't bother answering. I won't engage with you when it's clear all you're about is accusing others of unspecified 'bullshit' and attempting to start fights. Bah.

511 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:20:07pm

Tut tut. Matrix demanded nothing.

512 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:20:58pm

re: #504 TheMatrix31

A) The reference was stupid. Everyone knows he's not going to go punch someone and say America Fuck Yeah, but that's just your usage of that example to symbolize Bush's "Cowboy Diplomacy" that libs like you got so upset about for "the last 8 years".

Comprehension fail. Try again.


B) Your quip that "Bush, like a REAL President", poking fun at "those obvious IDIOTS who believe Obama isn't a realll President", must think that Bush is the holy grail of Presidencies, when he's been criticized over and over and over for things that he deservedly (and often undeservedly) needed to be.

Could you please rearrange these words into an intelligible form that would facilitate a reply?

C) Your stupid reference to his door gaffe was an obvious, unnecessary bit added on to fuel the fire of your obvious trolling.

You are as transparent as a piece of glass. Your intentions are clear as crystal, and I'm glad that there are people who are going to start calling you out on your, your girl's, and others' bullshit here. It's fucking getting annoying already.

Sure, that was a piece of added snark - but the target wasn't Bush himdelf but those who try to argue that Obama is an extraordinarily embarrassing president. I daresay there are websites where that might be considered off limits but it is not my impression that this is one of them. My own feelings about Bush himself are somewhat ambivalent - I don't think he was the best POTUS , or the worst that the USA has ever had, I have criticisms of course but they are rational ones. And as I've stated already I have always been happy to point out genuine instances of BDS.

As for your paranoid imaginings about 'me and my girl's ghastly agenda on LGF, all I can suggest to you is to wipe the froth off your keyboard and take a cold shower.

513 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:21:06pm

re: #506 TheMatrix31


I know people like you, I deal with people like you every single fucking day. I live in Los Angeles. It's like dealing with 8 million you's. All condescending, run-around pricks.

Uh, let me humbly suggest that if you imagine you 'know' Jimmah or anyone based on their internet persona, let alone know they are just like the people you deal with in real life, you need to spend more time in real life dealing with real problems and real people-- and less time acting that out on line.

514 hearmemeow  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:22:37pm

re: #261 iceweasel

He is the peasant boy who made good. He read the encyclopedia back to front.

As opposed to the natural born preppie with manners bred into him.

The problem is not that he is a peasant, most of us, including myself, fit into that category. The problem is that he aspires to a blue blood status and now has our whole country dancing the cotillon.

Hooray to the first Non-ugly American!

515 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:23:23pm

re: #487 Cineaste

Oh come on - we all knew that was a joke. It's a South Park reference to boot...

well, no we didn't.
I was looking for a sarc tag and didn't see one.
Not everyone watches teevee.

516 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:24:44pm

re: #515 reine.de.tout

well, no we didn't.
I was looking for a sarc tag and didn't see one.
Not everyone watches teevee.

Not everyone uses, or needs, sarc tags.

517 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:25:18pm

re: #510 iceweasel

What the hell are you talking about, why the hell are you even bringing me into this, and who the fuck do you think you are to demand that 'people be called on their bullshit'?

Lastly, don't bother answering. I won't engage with you when it's clear all you're about is accusing others of unspecified 'bullshit' and attempting to start fights. Bah.


I think it's pretty CLEAR what bullshit I was referring to.

And "who the fuck do you think you are" to demand people not to respond? You think I'm going to sit here and let you spin my words like you always do without a response? It's clear that thats what people like you love to do. Throw something at the wall, as bullshit and produced as it is, and hope it sticks because no one responds to it.

You're one to talk about how clear my "intentions are" as a poster.

Attempting to start fights, get the fuck out of here with that nonsense. Guaranteed you've started 10x more fights in your 6 months here than I have in my two years here. That's the biggest BS I've seen in my life, and it shows with responses to your posts by me and others over that time.

518 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:26:11pm

re: #513 iceweasel

if you imagine you 'know' Jimmah or anyone based on their internet persona

At least Matrix isn't marrying him.

519 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:26:35pm

re: #512 Jimmah

Sorry I can't speak a "Gentleman's English" like you can.

520 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:28:25pm

re: #515 reine.de.tout

well, no we didn't.
I was looking for a sarc tag and didn't see one.
Not everyone watches teevee.

Well seeing as how Bush had met foreign leaders and, to the best of our knowledge, never punched any of them in the nose (kiss, yep, but not punch), it's obvious he was either completely unaware of the last 8 years behavior (SARC) or making a joke.

And it wasn't TV, it was a film, but whatever... you didn't need to know it was a South Park reference to get the context.

521 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:29:30pm

re: #517 TheMatrix31

I think it's pretty CLEAR what bullshit I was referring to.

It's clear that thats what people like you love to do.

People like me? What would that be? Liberals?
And no, it's not clear what 'bullshit' you were referring to.

You're aggrieved and determined to see things in a weirdly personal manner. I have no idea why you even felt the need to address me or mention me in this thread-- except that, as noted, you're looking for a fight.

You'll have to conduct it with yourself, I'm afraid. I won't be helping you.

522 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:30:22pm

re: #521 iceweasel

I don't need your help for anything.

523 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:30:52pm

re: #520 Cineaste

Well seeing as how Bush had met foreign leaders and, to the best of our knowledge, never punched any of them in the nose (kiss, yep, but not punch), it's obvious he was either completely unaware of the last 8 years behavior (SARC) or making a joke.

And it wasn't TV, it was a film, but whatever... you didn't need to know it was a South Park reference to get the context.

Pretty much what I was about to say Cineaste - cheers!

524 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:30:58pm

re: #516 iceweasel

Not everyone uses, or needs, sarc tags.

Those who wish to be sure they are understood, do.

But the way this is going, it seems apparent that there are some who feel that their superiority over the rest of us is so obvious that it's unimportant to make sure they're properly understood except by only certain others, rather than by everyone.

525 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:31:04pm

re: #518 Sharmuta

Yeah, but the pick of the litter in Los Angeles is not what I'd classify as high quality, either.

526 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:32:02pm

re: #524 reine.de.tout

Especially when sarc tags @ LGF are TRADITIONS, just like the bowing to certain leaders by American Presidents.

/oh

527 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:32:47pm

re: #520 Cineaste

Well seeing as how Bush had met foreign leaders and, to the best of our knowledge, never punched any of them in the nose (kiss, yep, but not punch), it's obvious he was either completely unaware of the last 8 years behavior (SARC) or making a joke.

And it wasn't TV, it was a film, but whatever... you didn't need to know it was a South Park reference to get the context.

And no matter how many times you say it was "obvious", I'm telling you it was NOT obvious to everyone. Why do you insist on being dismissive of what I'm telling you was my experience with that statement? Do you not believe me? Do you just think I'm stupid? What?

528 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:33:19pm

re: #518 Sharmuta

At least Matrix isn't marrying him.

Me-OW!

529 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:34:12pm

re: #524 reine.de.tout

Those who wish to be sure they are understood, do.

But the way this is going, it seems apparent that there are some who feel that their superiority over the rest of us is so obvious that it's unimportant to make sure they're properly understood except by only certain others, rather than by everyone.

Except that it was obvious all along that was satire - the misunderstanding for those driving this was and is deliberate, for the sole purpose of stirring shit.

530 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:34:32pm

re: #526 TheMatrix31

Especially when sarc tags @ LGF are TRADITIONS, just like the bowing to certain leaders by American Presidents.

/oh

Some people don't use them, or only sometimes use them. Cato and Walter never use them IIRC; I only occasionally use them, etc.

531 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:35:16pm

re: #524 reine.de.tout

It's easy to be misunderstood in purely text communications. Sometimes this is aggravated by style. Clarity can be perceived as being too pedestrian.

532 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:35:40pm

re: #529 Jimmah

You're a psychologists dream. Projecting your intentions onto others as their own.

533 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:37:06pm

re: #531 jaunte

Suddenly I've got a Rodney King feeling.

534 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:38:08pm

re: #530 iceweasel

Some people don't use them, or only sometimes use them. Cato and Walter never use them IIRC; I only occasionally use them, etc.

Yep. Sometimes, as on this occasion, it is just so thuddingly obvious you don't bother with them.

535 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:38:27pm

re: #529 Jimmah

Except that it was obvious all along that was satire - the misunderstanding for those driving this was and is deliberate, for the sole purpose of stirring shit.

And once again, I say that while it may have been obvious to many, it was not obvious to all, including me. I'll ask you the same question I asked Cineaste - why are you dismissive of what I am saying my experience was with that statement? Do you think I'm lying? Do you think I'm stupid? What?

536 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:39:30pm

re: #535 reine.de.tout

That's what elitists do.

537 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:39:58pm

Say, can we somehow return to "on topic" dicussion of how America is becoming a third/fourth rate power, and yet, this is a "good thing" for the rest of the world?

538 marsl  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:40:16pm

Why all that controversy? It's a sign of respect. If Obama makes a koo-tow, that's another thing.
That's why Obama will win in 2012. The GOP is loosing time and wasting votes going after Shangri-la. It should concentrate in what people are worried about... terrorism, the economy, unemployment, the deficit, social security, health care...
Well, perhaps the leaders of the GOP (who are they?) believe in the 2012 prophecy and do not expect a 2012 election...

539 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:41:08pm

re: #535 reine.de.tout

I don't believe anyone could honestly fail to to realise that was satire. The fact that the anger level did not in any way dissipate when it was EXPLAINED that it was satire, repeatedly, confirms that conclusion beyond any doubt for me.

540 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:42:04pm

re: #539 Jimmah

It must be JDS, brooo. LGF-nut outrageee

541 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:42:54pm

re: #524 reine.de.tout

Those who wish to be sure they are understood, do.

But the way this is going, it seems apparent that there are some who feel that their superiority over the rest of us is so obvious that it's unimportant to make sure they're properly understood except by only certain others, rather than by everyone.

In general I agree, so maybe you can explain why you down dinged my #78 Do you really think that telling the world that they were "either with us or with the terrorists" should properly be understood as something other than a false dichotomy and false association based ultimatum? How was this not an ugly american thing to do? Should Bush have used a sarc tag?

542 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:43:12pm

re: #540 TheMatrix31

It must be JDS, brooo. LGF-nut outrageee

Some call it JDS, some call it butthurt:

543 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:45:19pm

re: #535 reine.de.tout

And once again, I say that while it may have been obvious to many, it was not obvious to all, including me. I'll ask you the same question I asked Cineaste - why are you dismissive of what I am saying my experience was with that statement? Do you think I'm lying? Do you think I'm stupid? What?

OK - let's assume you had no idea it was a joke and that he actually thinks bush would walk up to the emperor of Japan and say "America Fuck Yeah!" - let's say you believed that was his honest belief when he wrote it - now that he and numerous others have pointed out that it was sarcasm/satire, why are you still upset about it? Normally people go: "Hey, my bad, didn't get the joke..."

544 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:45:31pm

re: #542 Jimmah

Both stupid ass terms regardless.

545 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:45:36pm

re: #541 goddamnedfrank

Yeah, absolutely, by g-d. The Taliban, for example, have losts to be proud of...(it's all a matter of cultural perspective.)

546 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:47:11pm

re: #543 Cineaste

I explained the way that she, Sharmuta, Racer X, myself, and anyone else not involved in the clique construed it as in post #504, point A.

547 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:48:35pm

re: #538 marsl


Well, perhaps the leaders of the GOP (who are they?) believe in the 2012 prophecy and do not expect a 2012 election...

This is cool:
Scared Of Planet Nibiru? NASA Would Like To Help

According to numerous sources on the Internet, in 2012 a planet called Nibiru will collide with Earth, resulting in the extinction of the human race. Or the Earth's magnetic poles will flip, causing the rotation of the planet to reverse, resulting in the extinction of the human race. Or the Earth will fall into something called a "dark rift" in the Milky Way — resulting in the extinction of the human race.

So, what's NASA doing about it?

"NASA has nothing to do with the Planet Nibiru, because it doesn't exist," NASA astrobiologist David Morrison tells NPR's Guy Raz. "What I am doing is trying to answer all these people who are really scared, and see if we can't get some facts out to counteract the mythology on the Internet."

Morrison writes a column called "Ask an Astrobiologist" on NASA's Web site. Some years ago, he started receiving questions from people genuinely worried about what may happen in 2012.

Morrison now maintains a 2012 FAQ, where he debunks the doomsday scenarios.

548 jaunte  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:48:54pm

re: #543 Cineaste

Normally people go: "Hey, my bad, didn't get the joke...


That's the way it always works in comedy clubs.
(/)

549 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:50:10pm

re: #541 goddamnedfrank

In general I agree, so maybe you can explain why you down dinged my #78 Do you really think that telling the world that they were "either with us or with the terrorists" should properly be understood as something other than a false dichotomy and false association based ultimatum? How was this not an ugly american thing to do? Should Bush have used a sarc tag?

Here is your 78:

No, but telling the entire world that they are either with us or with the terrorists is the essence of historical bullying brand of Ugly Americanism. Bush didn't so much try to persuade the world to our side as he threatened them with a false dichotomy based false association with terrorists if they didn't kowtow to his demand.

I disagree with your assessment that this was a bullying brand of "ugly americanism". I think Bush took a strong stand and made strong statements and the situation at the time called for it. Perhaps you recall that day? Here's a link to something Charles has posted in his "Never Forget" files (upper left).

550 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:51:21pm

OK we know the thread is getting virulent when people start attacking relationships, getting cranky at perceived elitism and otherwise melting down.

So some basic rules of the road I hope we can all agree is reasonable...

1. Trying to snipe at someone through their GF/BF much less fiancée or spouse is just not cool.

2. Calling someone elitist or any particular name when they disagree is not advancing any arguments. This is a point I sometimes have trouble with. It is absolutely true that the apparent stupidity of one's interlocutor can at times be overwhelming, however, just because I mees up on it too, does not make it any more right.

3. It is perfectly relevant to bring up the massive hypocrisy. It is relevant in the case of the left and the right. In this case, the moderates (that's me) and the lefties are cranky because of eight years of being called names, by those who behaved worse. Now that the right is out of power, it has gotten even more hypocritical and obnoxious. It is perfectly kosher to call them on ODS particularly when their darlings do the same or worse, but it was perfectly OK then somehow.

$. This is an F'g blog. I repeat, a blog. Life and death are not at stake.

551 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:51:57pm

re: #543 Cineaste

OK - let's assume you had no idea it was a joke and that he actually thinks bush would walk up to the emperor of Japan and say "America Fuck Yeah!" - let's say you believed that was his honest belief when he wrote it - now that he and numerous others have pointed out that it was sarcasm/satire, why are you still upset about it? Normally people go: "Hey, my bad, didn't get the joke..."

I'm not upset about it.
Some go, My bad, I didnt get the joke.

Others say, gee, sorry, I try to be more clear next time.

I'm waiting for the Jimmah (and you) to say perhaps it could have been made more clear, instead of continuing to imply (as you have also) that those of us who didn't get it are - stupid or something.

552 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:52:11pm

re: #546 TheMatrix31

I explained the way that she, Sharmuta, Racer X, myself, and anyone else not involved in the clique construed it as in post #504, point A.

And I answered that semi-intelligible bs in post 512.

553 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:52:35pm

re: #549 reine.de.tout

Perhaps you recall that day? Here's a link to something Charles has posted in his "Never Forget" files (upper left).

Oh PLEASE. You're suggesting he doesn't remember 9-11? Unbelievable.

554 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:53:50pm

re: #550 LudwigVanQuixote

Excellent. Thank you.

555 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:54:26pm

re: #550 LudwigVanQuixote

Don't make "demands" of other LGFers. It's frowned upon by some.

556 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:54:36pm

re: #553 iceweasel

Oh PLEASE. You're suggesting he doesn't remember 9-11? Unbelievable.

He asked why I downdinged.
I explained.

If you don't like the way I responded, well, tell me please, what should I have said?

557 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:55:30pm

re: #551 reine.de.tout

I'm not upset about it.
Some go, My bad, I didnt get the joke.

Others say, gee, sorry, I try to be more clear next time.

I'm waiting for the Jimmah (and you) to say perhaps it could have been made more clear, instead of continuing to imply (as you have also) that those of us who didn't get it are - stupid or something.

You'll be waiting for a long time then because I don't know how it could have been more clear. And I guarantee you that if I had added a sarc tag to that post, it wouldn't have made any difference to the response.

558 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:55:31pm

re: #553 iceweasel

(but, seriously, ice, why would anyone outside the U.S. remember 9/11?)

559 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:56:17pm

re: #556 reine.de.tout

Why should she dictate what you have to say? That's what liberals like to do. Fuck that.

560 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:56:17pm

re: #550 LudwigVanQuixote

OK we know the thread is getting virulent when people start attacking relationships, getting cranky at perceived elitism and otherwise melting down.

So some basic rules of the road I hope we can all agree is reasonable...

1. Trying to snipe at someone through their GF/BF much less fiancée or spouse is just not cool.

2. Calling someone elitist or any particular name when they disagree is not advancing any arguments. This is a point I sometimes have trouble with. It is absolutely true that the apparent stupidity of one's interlocutor can at times be overwhelming, however, just because I mees up on it too, does not make it any more right.

3. It is perfectly relevant to bring up the massive hypocrisy. It is relevant in the case of the left and the right. In this case, the moderates (that's me) and the lefties are cranky because of eight years of being called names, by those who behaved worse. Now that the right is out of power, it has gotten even more hypocritical and obnoxious. It is perfectly kosher to call them on ODS particularly when their darlings do the same or worse, but it was perfectly OK then somehow.

$. This is an F'g blog. I repeat, a blog. Life and death are not at stake.

Well said, Ludwig.

561 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:56:54pm

re: #545 J.S.

Yeah, absolutely, by g-d. The Taliban, for example, have losts to be proud of...(it's all a matter of cultural perspective.)

]

Yes, the objective quality of the Taliban's rhetoric has attracted many quality allies to their side. We should aspire only to match our enemy's standards of behavior, and not shame them by adhering to pointless idealistic concepts like honesty and integrity. We should threaten our allies into agreeing with us.

///•∞

562 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:57:10pm

re: #557 Jimmah

I guess there's a different brand of "humor" there. Different protocols too.

563 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:57:11pm

re: #559 TheMatrix31

Why should she dictate what you have to say? That's what liberals like to do. Fuck that.

Well, exactly my point.
My response is my response. It is what it is.

564 funky chicken  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:57:26pm

re: #537 J.S.

Say, can we somehow return to "on topic" dicussion of how America is becoming a third/fourth rate power, and yet, this is a "good thing" for the rest of the world?

Er, my husband's in the military and after his tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, where he interacted with all of our allies over there, and we aren't a 3rd or 4th rate power.

He came back impressed with the Brits and Aussies (although there are far too few of them because of geography and population, of course) and surprised (in a good way) by the French. The German troops are apparently beyond worthless--fat, whiny, lazy, etc. He was also impressed by how crazy some Ukranian pilots were who brought them cargo in Afghanistan. He said a lot of our planes are crap (civilian airliners wouldn't touch them) but the Ukranian ones are apparently insanely bad. But they fly them anyway.

However, even if all of those guys were to go insane tomorrow and decide to team up to attack us--no contest.

565 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:58:10pm

re: #555 Sharmuta

Don't make "demands" of other LGFers. It's frowned upon by some.

Sharm I am making no demands on anyone. I am respectfully suggesting that this thread has gotten ugly in ways that are abnormal and that people should breathe.

I have no idea why you currently are so cranky at me. But, I am not cranky at you. I would prefer not to see fighting get this personal.

Even when I am calling someone an utter idiot, I am at least pointing out some facts that I think should be obvious as to why they are being an idiot.

And even that has been rightly called on me a number of times.

This is just getting ugly.

566 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:58:44pm

re: #561 goddamnedfrank

yeah, I think that pretty much sums up the situation...

567 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:59:05pm

re: #554 iceweasel

re: #560 Jimmah

No problem... well said typos and all. LOL...

568 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:59:30pm

re: #565 LudwigVanQuixote

People? or me? Why don't you get specific here? I won't get my feelings hurt. Or as some would like to so "cleverly" state, I won't get" butthurt" brooo

569 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 2:59:59pm

re: #562 TheMatrix31

I guess there's a different brand of "humor" there. Different protocols too.

And continuing dismissiveness to my statement that I didn't understand it to be a "joke" or sarcasm or anything else.

Without saying the words, the dismissive attitude alone implies what they think of those of us who didn't "get" it - we're stupid.

570 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:01:06pm

re: #565 LudwigVanQuixote

And BTW, it didn't have to get ugly, but I'm sorry--I'm not going to sit here and let those people spin their ownwords and cast any challengers as idiots, continuing to do what they do oh so well. I've had enough of sitting idly by and reading that shit. Not my fault.

571 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:01:07pm

re: #565 LudwigVanQuixote

Sometimes harvest isn't pretty but reaping what one's sown is what it is.

572 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:01:31pm

re: #568 TheMatrix31

People? or me? Why don't you get specific here? I won't get my feelings hurt. Or as some would like to so "cleverly" state, I won't get" butthurt" brooo

OK, your reference to other's relationships was uncalled for.

I was attempting to defuse the situation by allowing you to see it from a third person perspective. If you want first person then, please, just breathe. This is a comment section on a blog. It is not the future of humanity.

573 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:03:20pm

re: #558 J.S.

(but, seriously, ice, why would anyone outside the U.S. remember 9/11?)

I don't think many outside the US have forgotten 9-11. For one thing, many of us had relatives who were killed or injured/traumatised in it.

574 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:03:59pm

re: #573 Jimmah

You mean the martyrs?

575 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:05:55pm

re: #574 J.S.

You mean the martyrs?

Why would you think he meant that?

Aside from the approximately 2,669 United States casualties, 329 foreign nationals (excluding the nineteen perpetrators) also perished in the attacks. The following is a list of their nationalities (not accounting for at least some cases of dual-citizenship). By far the country with the largest loss of life was the United Kingdom, with 67 deaths (excluding the overseas territory of Bermuda). India had 41, South Korea had 28 and Canada and Japan had 24 each. Colombia had seventeen and Jamaica, Mexico and the Philippines had sixteen each. Australia and Germany had eleven each, while Italy had ten.

576 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:06:28pm

re: #571 Sharmuta

Sometimes harvest isn't pretty but reaping what one's sown is what it is.

Then take it up with those people personally and off the blog. If I have done something to earn your anger, I hereby apologize without reservation. If it is someone else who is currently reaping, then talk it out with them. It is pretty obvious that the level of animus is getting personal and not about the issues anymore. That makes this ugly.

577 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:06:58pm

re: #572 LudwigVanQuixote

No one is acting like it's anything more. Trust me, if it meant anything more to me, you would know it.

And I don't understand this whole "going after a person's relationship" thing. I said "you, your girl's". That's a statement of fact. They're together. Whoopty-freakin'-doo. They also hold the same exact beliefs on things (seemingly, at least), and post/interact the same exact way on here, especially when it comes to their challengers. That's why I lumped them together. And I said "and others' bullshit", meaning that there are more than just those two.

I'm not singling out their relationship. I couldn't give a fuck less about their relationship. If I was going after them, you would know it.

578 Obdicut  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:07:06pm

re: #559 TheMatrix31

Why should she dictate what you have to say? That's what liberals like to do. Fuck that.

Please tell us more bout what 'liberals' like to do.

579 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:07:12pm

re: #569 reine.de.tout

And continuing dismissiveness to my statement that I didn't understand it to be a "joke" or sarcasm or anything else.

Without saying the words, the dismissive attitude alone implies what they think of those of us who didn't "get" it - we're stupid.

I am not going to apologise for your or anyone elses misunderstanding. Most people got it. And if I said that I believed that the misunderstanding was genuine, I would be lying. I'm not going to do that either.

580 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:07:57pm

ladies and gents.

the whole lot of you - do a kindness - and please - STFU.

the lot of you. right now.

all of you.

decamp. halt. desist.

please.

581 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:08:07pm

re: #578 Obdicut

I'm sorry, I don't have a week to devote to explaining.

582 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:08:12pm

re: #576 LudwigVanQuixote

Then take it up with those people personally and off the blog.

No- this is concerning the behavior of some on this blog, and here at this blog is the proper place to discuss it. You don't have the authority to ask any of us to take it elsewhere.

583 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:08:24pm

re: #574 J.S.

No I mean the innocent victims of the attack.

584 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:09:08pm

re: #580 wozzablog

It's not your place to tell anyone to STFU.

585 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:09:38pm

re: #580 wozzablog

i haven't been in this conversation - i don't have a dog in this fight. but i'm reading back and it's going nowhere but backwards - and unpleasently at that.

586 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:10:13pm

re: #582 Sharmuta

No- this is concerning the behavior of some on this blog, and here at this blog is the proper place to discuss it. You don't have the authority to ask any of us to take it elsewhere.

Sharm it is a request, not an order.

I am not trying to order you to do anything. There have been times where you yourself have pointed out that I should chill. You were right. The same principle now applies to everyone who is getting snarky.

587 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:10:54pm

re: #584 Sharmuta

ok, i will rephrase - can everyone please move along.

there is nothing to see here.


i'm outta here. if people ant to continue whats going on be my guests.

588 Sharmuta  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:11:18pm

I have to go, so I'm not ignoring anyone. Just have to go.

589 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:11:34pm

re: #583 Jimmah

oh, you mean, not the little eichmanns?

590 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:12:08pm

re: #579 Jimmah

I am not going to apologise for your or anyone elses misunderstanding. Most people got it. And if I said that I believed that the misunderstanding was genuine, I would be lying. I'm not going to do that either.

I'm not asking for an apology of any sort.
You explained what you meant. But instead of following up with any indication that you would try to be more clear in the future, you followed your explanation with comments from you and others implying that those of us who didn't get it either didn't get it on purpose, or are lying, or are stupid, or whatever.

I would just have said OK, I'll try to be more clear in the future. Simple thing to do. Unless, I guess, one is superior to the rest of us?

591 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:12:45pm

re: #589 J.S.

oh, you mean, not the little eichmanns?

WTF J.S. Breathe!

592 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:13:37pm

re: #576 LudwigVanQuixote

Then take it up with those people personally and off the blog. If I have done something to earn your anger, I hereby apologize without reservation. If it is someone else who is currently reaping, then talk it out with them. It is pretty obvious that the level of animus is getting personal and not about the issues anymore. That makes this ugly.

This little anti- Jimmah and iceweasel thing of Sharm's hasn't ever been about issues, Ludwig. What I know is that a couple of weeks ago, Sharm switched from being a friend who was usually in agreement with us to being someone who was constantly looking to pick fights with us. Did either Ice or myself start making radically different comments to those we have always done? This is entirely personal.

593 oldegeezr  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:13:37pm

re: #130 sattv4u2

Of course he hasn't. Thats your ODS showing!
Barack Hussein Obama ,,, mmm,mmm,mmm!

That quote, sir; is an el primo example el Rushbo's feeble attempt at satirical humor to cover his despicable racial bigotry...!

594 TheMatrix31  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:18:58pm

re: #593 oldegeezr

Considering that Barack Obama has "embraced his Muslim roots" since he took office. You know, now that it's acceptable and not a risque topic during the election season, right?

I think you just suffer from RushDerangementSyndrome, brooo//

595 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:19:06pm

re: #592 Jimmah

Yes it is, so perhaps you should take it up with her and try to clear the air. Otherwise, this is going to spiral into an ugly little highschool popularity contest.

596 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:20:02pm

re: #589 J.S.

Care to explain what you mean by that buddy?

597 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:20:17pm

re: #591 LudwigVanQuixote

(heh, heh, heh...jus' a liitle joke...Actually, hmmm...my political views are always mobile..or at least to a certain extent..)

598 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:21:47pm

re: #592 Jimmah

This little anti- Jimmah and iceweasel thing of Sharm's hasn't ever been about issues, Ludwig. What I know is that a couple of weeks ago, Sharm switched from being a friend who was usually in agreement with us to being someone who was constantly looking to pick fights with us. Did either Ice or myself start making radically different comments to those we have always done? This is entirely personal.

Well, yes, as a matter of fact, I noticed that the tone changed.

There was baiting with a completely off-topic comment, followed by an admission of "testing" the "butthurt".

599 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:22:28pm

re: #595 LudwigVanQuixote

Yes it is, so perhaps you should take it up with her and try to clear the air. Otherwise, this is going to spiral into an ugly little highschool popularity contest.

I agree. Iceweasel has offered to take this up by email where it belongs more than once, but Sharm refuses to do this, preferring instead to launch attacks on this blog.

600 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:24:46pm

re: #549 reine.de.tout

I disagree with your assessment that this was a bullying brand of "ugly americanism". I think Bush took a strong stand and made strong statements and the situation at the time called for it. Perhaps you recall that day? Here's a link to something Charles has posted in his "Never Forget" files (upper left).

I see.

I have not forgotten.

I simply believe that the courage in one's convictions is tested most in such times of extreme adversity, but that this does not excuse the abandonment of one's standards of behavior. I believe it is times like that when they matter most. I believe that Bush would have been able to build a coalition much greater than his father's had he asked for help in a less polarizing and insulting way.

601 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:28:48pm

re: #600 goddamnedfrank

I see.

I have not forgotten.

I simply believe that the courage in one's convictions is tested most in such times of extreme adversity, but that this does not excuse the abandonment of one's standards of behavior. I believe it is times like that when they matter most. I believe that Bush would have been able to build a coalition much greater than his father's had he asked for help in a less polarizing and insulting way.

Precisely. And as to your first point-- it's easy to defend free speech (for example) when we're at peace. Much harder, and more important, to ensure we still have it in time of war-- as with all our civil liberties.

602 reine.de.tout  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:29:44pm

re: #600 goddamnedfrank

I see.

I have not forgotten.

I simply believe that the courage in one's convictions is tested most in such times of extreme adversity, but that this does not excuse the abandonment of one's standards of behavior. I believe it is times like that when they matter most. I believe that Bush would have been able to build a coalition much greater than his father's had he asked for help in a less polarizing and insulting way.

You may be correct in that.

I think for many Americans, at that particular time - I recall being confused, angry, upset - and for me, it was comforting to hear our President speaking strongly. It may not have been that way for everyone, but it was for me and many I knew.

I believe Bush did the best he could given a terrible situation. I didn't like seeing it characterized, as you did in your 78, as a bullying threat "with a false dichotomy based false association with terrorists if they didn't kowtow to his demand."

603 swamprat  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:30:09pm

Seeing as how Angela Merkel couldn't possible be mistaken for a super model, the most likely explanation for Bush's shoulder rub, is that he was tired and momentarily reacted instinctively to a profile and possibly garment, that was similar to his wife's'. The fact that we can only find the moment of this faux paux, and no video of the moments before or after is highly suspect/ but also a complete waste of time and effort because the man is no longer president. That's right; he no longer has hordes of ravenous reporters looking to interpret every possible movement and verbiage with the most negative connotation possible. No longer does he have to endure "press conferences" with accusations that only vaguely meet the verbal structural requirements necessary to be considered a "question". His political career has ended after two terms. He is no longer president, nor is he running for any office. His only function at this time is to be an scapegoat for the failings of a party who needs to quit looking for excuses, and pull up its collective socks. And I don't care if you think Bush was trying to seduce or assault the lovely Angela Merkel in a room full of dignitaries and reporters with video cameras to record the act for future enjoyment;
Bush is done
Obama did the right thing by bowing
and I am going to put some more insulation up in the bedroom

604 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:31:15pm

re: #599 Jimmah

I agree. Iceweasel has offered to take this up by email where it belongs more than once, but Sharm refuses to do this, preferring instead to launch attacks on this blog.

Then respectfully coming from a it takes one to know one point of view - and I am referring to my own battles with my own temper - you two need to not make this not a he said she said or any of the other things that will make all participants look like angry kids.

It is one thing to hear someone say something so silly and absolutely not in sync with reality that you burst out. Ok, I get how difficult it can be to just say nothing when someone is being an utter fool, like claiming that it is ok to back rub random women, or that ID is science, or that Obama is from Mars, or whatever.

If those conversations get heated, then at some later point there is still room to look at the facts and talk amicably at some point.

However, this is pure politicking of the high school level. Once people feel backed into corners on purely personal grounds, there is not a lot of chance of things coming back to polite.

605 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:31:59pm

re: #598 reine.de.tout

Well, yes, as a matter of fact, I noticed that the tone changed.

There was baiting with a completely off-topic comment, followed by an admission of "testing" the "butthurt".

Wow - so these instances of mild snark are supposed to show a change in my tone? Let's see - what do you think of this, then, from January of this year:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]


Disappointed Republicans today announced the start of a four year "virtual bitch-in" in response to Obama's election. "Sitting in front of our computers for four years bitching about everything he does and everything that people say about him may not be the whole answer, but it's about all we can think of at the moment" said spokesperson Robert Nadir.

"With the republicans currently in such a hopeless, directionless mess, making predictions of impending Obama-doom and spinning every event in the most negative way possible is the only thing that's keeping us going." he continued. "Frankly, it's either that or take our own lives."

Lifelong republican Susan Trough thinks the right shouldn't be limited to her colleagues' virtual solution. "It's not all about packing out online discussion forums and wallowing in a swill of our own collective bile. We also encourage our members to get out there and indulge in armageddon like fantasies. Collecting guns and ammo is for these people a healthy outlet for their frustrations, and makes them feel like they're really doing something constructive for the future."

Other republicans are getting creative with the application of satire. One such - John Downer, who runs a print shop in Lynchburg VA, has come up with the idea of printing Obama's face on the inside bottom of coffee mugs. "A lot of my republican customers, like myself, have been experiencing feelings of powerlessness since Obama took office, and needed something to help them to feel politically relevant again. Now, with my range of Obama coffee mugs, every time you pour yourself a hot drink, it's like you are pouring boiling water directly onto his face. Between that and the caffeine it's a real pick-me-up."

Finally, and perhaps most radical of all, some forward thinking republicans are considering having another go with Sarah Palin at the next Election, this time as Presidential candidate. "I think we'll see her mature and be able to handle simple questions without making everyone present bite their knuckles in shame by the time the next campaign begins. This is what we call fresh thinking." says David Newlow.

Yeah sure, Reine, I never posted like that before...

606 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:32:55pm

re: #600 goddamnedfrank

I see.

I have not forgotten.

I simply believe that the courage in one's convictions is tested most in such times of extreme adversity, but that this does not excuse the abandonment of one's standards of behavior. I believe it is times like that when they matter most. I believe that Bush would have been able to build a coalition much greater than his father's had he asked for help in a less polarizing and insulting way.

Absolutely. It also would have helped if his stated reasons - Iraqi nukes were reality. Every other nation in the world with satellites knew there was no massive uranium enrichment program there.

607 oldegeezr  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:34:00pm

re: #594 TheMatrix31

Yeh just smoked me M_31

“I think you just suffer from RushDerangementSyndrome, brooo//”

How could yah tell... or shouldn’t I ask...?

I still insist...

“Be true to yourself and thou cants’ be false to no man...or woman for that matter...!

608 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:34:43pm

re: #604 LudwigVanQuixote


However, this is pure politicking of the high school level. Once people feel backed into corners on purely personal grounds, there is not a lot of chance of things coming back to polite.

Yes. That's going on on some level. There's also purely personal issues at work in some cases that should be sorted out off blog, but aren't.

There's really not much to be done other than recognising it's there and ignoring it or refusing to engage with it when it happens, I'm afraid.

609 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:35:02pm

re: #605 Jimmah

Jimmah, people's policial views change over time...it's been known to happen..(have to take it all in stride..)

610 Obdicut  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:37:48pm

re: #602 reine.de.tout

You may be correct in that.

I think for many Americans, at that particular time - I recall being confused, angry, upset - and for me, it was comforting to hear our President speaking strongly. It may not have been that way for everyone, but it was for me and many I knew.

I believe Bush did the best he could given a terrible situation. I didn't like seeing it characterized, as you did in your 78, as a bullying threat "with a false dichotomy based false association with terrorists if they didn't kowtow to his demand."

The US had the chance to remain the global leader in terms of behavior as well as power, to champion ethically correct virtues against those of theocracy, dictatorships, and completely corrupt nations.

He failed to seize that chance, aiming for a much smaller, more cynical goal.

You cannot separate his speech from his actions afterwards. The speech is in that context.

611 LudwigVanQuixote  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:40:00pm

re: #608 iceweasel

I'm on IM. Please do say hello.

612 solomonpanting  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:46:17pm

re: #610 Obdicut

The US had the chance to remain the global leader in terms of behavior as well as power, to champion ethically correct virtues against those of theocracy, dictatorships, and completely corrupt nations.

He failed to seize that chance, aiming for a much smaller, more cynical goal.

You cannot separate his speech from his actions afterwards. The speech is in that context.


It could have been better. We could still be negotiating with Saddam, France, Russia, China...

And you know that I could have me a million more friends
And all I'd have to lose is my point of view

613 lemonslice  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:54:45pm

My wife's family is Japanese, and as a frequent visitor, I've been schooled in the art of respectful bowing. Correctly done, the traditional bow is not nearly as exaggerated as what is pictured here. I don't assign any ulterior motive to the President's incorrectly-executed bow, I just recognize it as being more melodramatically humble than necessary. Probably because Obama is not all that familiar with the gesture. We don't expect him to intimately familiar with this traditional gesture, there's no need to be.

But it wouldn't take much effort to observe how it's done, and execute it more normally, as other foreign leaders do, would it? If I can learn to do it, anyone can. It looks like Obama got carried away trying to be respectful, and overdid it. Of course his critics are going to enjoy mocking the photograph, I don't blame them, it's an easy target. I understand LGF's inclination is to defend Obama, and to instead expose and mock his critics. So be it. It's trivial. But good grief, it makes both the critics and counter-critics look equally foolish.

As a Westerner trained in manners by my wife's family, I'm not an authority, but contrary to those here who insist the President's bow is an example of a "minimally respectful" gesture, I'd say Obama's deep bow is "maximally respectful", to the point of being comical.

If I had two minutes with the Commander in Chief beforehand, I could have helped him practice a little, and saved him some embarrassment. Dang man, keep your head up! You're not trying to tie their shoes! A very minimal gesture, slight tilt of the head, eyes down, modest and appropriate, is all that's necessary.

614 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:58:37pm

re: #613 lemonslice

I think you nail it 100% - well said. It was a little silly in its grandeur but I don't think he was implying "please let us work as your slaves oh mighty overlord..."

:)

615 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 3:59:25pm

re: #606 LudwigVanQuixote

Absolutely. It also would have helped if his stated reasons - Iraqi nukes were reality. Every other nation in the world with satellites knew there was no massive uranium enrichment program there.

The "either with us or with the terrorists" line dates to Sept. 21, 2001. The early push by a few hardliners on Iraq was pretty much sidelined at this point, all eyes were ostensibly on Taliban Afghanistan. Powell was still Sec. State, the momentum of public opinion and world outrage was overwhelmingly on our side.

This is the best analogy I can find for how that statement came off (probably not safe for work):

616 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:25:05pm

re: #613 lemonslice

I just recognize it as being more melodramatically humble than necessary. Probably because Obama is not all that familiar with the gesture

Obama has an entire Protocol Office and Advisers to advise him. that's their job. To think that this gesture of Obama's was not assiduously practised beforehand is to become willfully blind, willfully naive. He did the bow so as to communicate "a message" ..If you can't figure out what that message is - if you're all prplexed by it -- then, get yourself an interpreter...

617 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:27:08pm

re: #616 J.S.

Obama has an entire Protocol Office and Advisers to advise him. that's their job. To think that this gesture of Obama's was not assiduously practised beforehand is to become willfully blind, willfully naive. He did the bow so as to communicate "a message" ..If you can't figure out what that message is - if you're all prplexed by it -- then, get yourself an interpreter...

The message, obviously, is "You are my master now, O God-Emperor!"

Right? What else could it be?

618 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:29:06pm

re: #617 Cato the Elder

He wishes to be obsequience (is that a bad thing?)

619 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:29:55pm

How can you be an abstract noun?

620 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:32:04pm

re: #619 Cato the Elder

it was the spell check -- you know -- humble, obsequent...show his obsequence.

621 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:33:57pm

as opposed to being "arrogant." (Don't forget "the world loves him.")

622 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:34:08pm

George Dybbuk Bush, coming from an old New England family (the Texas thang was a front), would have done it differently. But then he got to observe his dad getting respectful reacharounds from the likes of Saddam Hussein (before he went rogue, while he was still Our Man with the Plan), so he wouldn't have been so exuberant or tits-out about it all.

Obama's just a little too taken with foreign potentates for my taste, but it's still a nontroversy.

623 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:35:53pm

re: #622 Cato the Elder

"The world" is very apt to interpret it as a sign of weakness...(as I roll my eyes.)

624 swamprat  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:37:04pm

This has been the classiest thread ever!

625 Gusbenz  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:42:28pm

I think many are confusing the rule that the flag of the United States never dips with the rules governing presidential etiquette.

626 TNTiger  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:43:10pm

who cares!

627 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:45:01pm

re: #623 J.S.

"The world" is very apt to interpret it as a sign of weakness...(as I roll my eyes.)

Yes. Japan will begin its attack tomorrow.

628 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:47:31pm

re: #623 J.S.

"The world" is very apt to interpret it as a sign of weakness...(as I roll my eyes.)

Meh - I think loaning our military out to a two-bit hustler and scam artist we called curveball so that he could make some cash and get some power in Iraq was a bit worse than bending 20 degrees to far in his bow to the ceremonial head of state of a country we have a long-standing friendship with was a bit more of a sign of weakness but hey, that's just me...

629 [deleted]  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:47:38pm
630 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:47:38pm

re: #627 Cato the Elder

Yes. Japan will begin its attack tomorrow.

History will repeat itself once again as the Germans attack Pearl Harbor!

//

631 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:49:49pm

re: #629 dak

Hey - we have our political differences around here but knock that shit off, ok?

632 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 4:57:04pm

re: #625 Gusbenz

I think many are confusing the rule that the flag of the United States never dips with the rules governing presidential etiquette.

See my #442.

633 prairiefire  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:01:22pm

re: #603 swamprat

I think it is thoughtful of him to visit with the troops. Hope the insulation saves you greenbacks!

634 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:02:48pm
635 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:05:40pm

re: #634 Gus 802

How soon we forget.

We were in bed with Saddam a lot longer than we were at war with him.

636 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:08:00pm

Did I just hear on CTV "news " an item from their "jornalistic program", The Fifth Estate (this program typically deals with factual news items/investigations). I believe I heard, "Is the U.S. administration taking orders from a cave in Afhghisntan?" -- I'm too tired to even look this up..I trust I'm wrong...)

637 colosurfbum  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:10:52pm

At first I was "OH LORD HERE WE GO AGAIN" with numb nuts, however that is the protocol in the far eat. So I calmed down, and said no biggie, maybe he's this time he's not blowing off another ally and embarrassing the U.S.. His decision on the trials and AF/PAK theater are more worrisome.

638 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:11:29pm

re: #635 Cato the Elder

How soon we forget.

We were in bed with Saddam a lot longer than we were at war with him.

Yeah, I thought there was some context to that. Especially after reading some hilarious story at the Daily Mail entitled, "Obama branded 'Groveller-in-Chief' after deep bow to Emperor son of Japanese ruler who authorised Pearl Harbour attack."

Of course that's part of what the response is about, World War 2 of all things. They implore to us that we forget one thing and never the other. Even after 65 years and an obvious change of ideology within the nations involved.

So never mind Saddam and the others. We're onto other things. Like the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941! I guess "the Germans" don't fall into this confused logic. They are after all, Europeans.

639 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:19:23pm

Germans of die alte Schule still do slight bows when greeting a superior.

Can you imagine the hullabaloo if Obama bowed even infinitesimally to Merkel?

Actually, I think for his next international meeting of any consequence, he should pull out all the stops, jerk all the chains, ring all the bells...and curtsy.

640 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:29:12pm

re: #638 Gus 802

was it over when the Germans bombed pearl harbour???...


641 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:29:57pm

re: #639 Cato the Elder

Germans of die alte Schule still do slight bows when greeting a superior.

Can you imagine the hullabaloo if Obama bowed even infinitesimally to Merkel?

Actually, I think for his next international meeting of any consequence, he should pull out all the stops, jerk all the chains, ring all the bells...and curtsy.

Speaking of curtsy, that also crossed my mind before and did a search within Getty Images. Mostly women. Was tempted to make a joke regarding Obama, "well, at least he didn't curtsy."

This is what they wrote over at the Daily Mail:

President Obama has been branded the ‘Groveller-in-Chief’ after giving an exaggerated bow to Japan’s emperor Akihito - the son of the ruler who authorised the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor.

Coming so soon after Remembrance Day, the deep bow caused an outcry in the U.S.

While it was seen as a sign of respect in Japan, Mr Obama was attacked in America for ‘bowing and scraping’ to a foreign leader, particularly a Japanese one. Wartime scars are still raw for many Americans.

Wartime scars regarding WWII Japan? Perhaps for a few surviving veterans of the Pacific theater but even most of them have moved on. This tells me that there's a good deal of xenophobia taking place here because they are still as they would archaically call, "orientals." The same with "the Japanes are taking over" mania from the 1980s and even 90s.

Odd this Japan-a-phobia. Only a couple of months ago those very same bloggers were calling for the nuking of North Korea because they were making threats to Japan.

642 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:30:38pm

re: #637 colosurfbum

His decision on the trials and AF/PAK theater are more worrisome.

Why is everyone so afraid of our civilian justice system? It has performed exceedingly well on terrorism cases so far.

643 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:33:16pm

re: #642 Cineaste

Why is everyone so afraid of our civilian justice system? It has performed exceedingly well on terrorism cases so far.

145 successful federal prosecutions of terrorists so far, according to the think progress link I gave above.

644 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:35:40pm

Breaking News:

Michelle Malkin calls for the internment of Japanese-Americans as a precaution to President Obama's bowing and grovelling to the emperor of the Nation of Nippon.

Invasion is imminent.

Pacific based spotters have spotted several Nipponese Air Force dirigibles heading towards Los Angeles and Portland.

//

645 blueherron  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:37:19pm

re: #643 iceweasel

145 successful federal prosecutions of terrorists so far, according to the think progress link I gave above.

I can't wait till the trial(s). How ya doin' Iceweasel, you bride, you.

646 j.s.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:37:55pm

re: #642 Cineaste

Andrew C. McCarthy was a prosecutor in the firs WTC bombing in 1993. He's opposed to criminal trials for terrorists. He wrote a book, "Willful Blindness." (Internet Explorer 8 is acting up, going to try FirefoX.)

647 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:48:57pm

re: #642 Cineaste

In Willfull Blindness, the author argued that in order to obtain a conviction, the prosecutors would need to do "short=cuts." And these short-cuts dramatically undermine "justice" (in terms of what is traditionally allotted to the accused.)

648 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:50:12pm

re: #646 j.s.

Andrew C. McCarthy was a prosecutor in the firs WTC bombing in 1993. He's opposed to criminal trials for terrorists. He wrote a book, "Willful Blindness." (Internet Explorer 8 is acting up, going to try FirefoX.)

Yes, Andrew C. McCarthy was for civil prosecutions before he was against it. He would have been drooling at the chance to prosecute these terrorists but that was before he resigned and went over to National Review.

He's also a nirther facilitator:

But we should know. The point has little to do with whether Obama was born in Hawaii. I’m quite confident that he was. The issue is: What is the true personal history of the man who has been sold to us based on nothing but his personal history? On that issue, Obama has demonstrated himself to be an unreliable source and, sadly, we can’t trust the media to get to the bottom of it. What’s wrong with saying, to a president who promised unprecedented “transparency”: Give us all the raw data and we’ll figure it out for ourselves?

Bring us your nirth certificate says Mr. McCarthy and give Orly Taitz the trial she seeks.

Bleh.

649 oldegeezr  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:51:38pm

I think you just suffer from RushDerangementSyndrome, brooo//

As I attempted earlier... do I have to “chew my cabbage twice”..?
I actually luv cabbage with apple cider vinegar..!
re: #603 swamprat

You dah ...Babe...!

650 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:52:42pm

re: #648 Gus 802

You need to deal with the arguments he presents -- and i don't really care who's personally presenting the arguments (it could be a convicted felon) or his/her personal background -- it's irrelevant to the substance of the arguments.

651 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:55:42pm

re: #645 blueherron

I can't wait till the trial(s). How ya doin' Iceweasel, you bride, you.

Hey bh! I can't wait for them either. :)

I'm fiesty and fine! very excited! won't be a bride til next month though. Now I'm blogtrothed apparently.

How are you? Glad you're sticking around!

652 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 5:58:25pm

I see huge, huge problems for the prosecutors. where's the forensic evidence if you're alleging that X murdered Y? on a battlefield.. (or worse the alleged claims about X supporting Y in terms of financing al-Qaeda types.) (Sorry, I just don't see it...)

653 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:00:27pm

re: #648 Gus 802

Bring us your nirth certificate says Mr. McCarthy and give Orly Taitz the trial she seeks.

Bleh.

Bleh indeed. In addition to being NRO's resident nirther and nirther apologist, he also considers the shrieking harpy to be a reputable source. Here he is back in October 2008:

Pamela Gellers at Atlas Shrugs raises some apparent shenanigans with the birth certificate the Obama campaign previously produced. Meanwhile, Philip J. Berg, a former Deputy AG of Pennsylvania and a professed Hillary supporter, filed a lawsuit claiming Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be president; instead of simply clearing up any questions — which you would think would take about five minutes — Obama's lawyers moved to dismiss the suit and failed to file a timely answer, meaning that, under the applicable rules (according to Berg), Obama is legally deemed to have admitted Berg's allegations that he is constitutionally ineligible to be president.

Hadn't Pammy already posted that Obama was the secret love child of Malcolm X by then? (late October) -- There is no longer any excuse for anyone of any repute to ever link to her again IMO, unless they're doing it to point and laugh. The NRO has seriously been circling the toilet for some time.

654 kipallen  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:01:45pm

It really boils down to this: Americans do not bow to foreign potentates.

655 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:02:29pm

One may be angry and feel (really, really feel with an intensity of emotion) that X committed crime Y, but criminal prosecutions are all about the evidence, not about your personal feelings.(no matter how intense).

656 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:06:33pm

re: #653 iceweasel

Hadn't Pammy already posted that Obama was the secret love child of Malcolm X by then? (late October) -- There is no longer any excuse for anyone of any repute to ever link to her again IMO, unless they're doing it to point and laugh. The NRO has seriously been circling the toilet for some time.

Doesn't take long does it? I tell you, these guys are so predictable.

657 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:10:27pm

re: #656 Gus 802

Doesn't take long does it? I tell you, these guys are so predictable.

It's just so weird. I'm fascinated by meta-media, the way politics gets covered, and I just can't figure out what the hell the motivation of the wingnut outrage merchants could be. There's no shortage of legitimate criticisms to make of Obama. What is up with making issues out of nonissues all the time? Sometimes I really do think the right side of the blogosphere has completely lost its collective mind.

658 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:11:46pm

there are in the United States, things such as Miranda Rights -- that's the right to inform the accused of the right to hire an attorney. think Omar Khadr had Miranda riights read to him? there are "chains of evidence" (whereby, say, a bullet, in a criminal case, the whole chain is documented and traced back to the accused ), this is to prevent the wrong person from being falsely accused...in a firefight? on a battlefield? soldiers are not CSI investigators.

659 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:12:51pm

re: #654 kipallen

It really boils down to this: Americans do not bow to foreign potentates.

.05 seconds on google would have shown you that isn't true, or a little bit of time reading this thread, where photos have been linked of nixon, eisenhower, bush and more.

660 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:14:28pm

re: #657 iceweasel

they are being fed and encouraged by higherups in the GOP...

they should have been ignored. But some guy did a random sampling of Republican congressmen and most of them didn't want to admit, couldn't bring themselves to say or just did not know that Barrack was a US citizen.

661 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:14:40pm

The prosecution typically needs to reconstruct the entire crime scene -- examine trace evidence (gun powder on the accused hands, etc,)..Think this forensic evidence gathering took place in Afghanistan?

662 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:16:02pm

re: #657 iceweasel

It's just so weird. I'm fascinated by meta-media, the way politics gets covered, and I just can't figure out what the hell the motivation of the wingnut outrage merchants could be. There's no shortage of legitimate criticisms to make of Obama. What is up with making issues out of nonissues all the time? Sometimes I really do think the right side of the blogosphere has completely lost its collective mind.

Part of it is book sales. Most of these people are "authors" which is a loose terms in this day and age.

McCarthy has a piece at NRO laying blame one someone or something. Given the current administration I assume the one single person to blame is Obama. In it he is laying blame on General George Casey. Casey became COS of the Army in 2007. He is also blaming the FBI for not pursuing the Hasan case and this occurred last year (2008). He then concludes to "be prepared for more Fort Hoods."

We know who he is implicating. But look at the time line. Perhaps he is implicating all those involved in previous years but I doubt his enraged readership will let alone after it goes through revisionist version over the bloggosphere.

663 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:17:13pm

If such slip-shod prosecutions are allowed to proceed -- to waive what's typically required of prosecutors -- what do you think happens to alleged "criminals" accused of crimes in the U.S."? Is torture now acceptable?

664 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:18:35pm

re: #661 J.S.

The prosecution typically needs to reconstruct the entire crime scene -- examine trace evidence (gun powder on the accused hands, etc,)..Think this forensic evidence gathering took place in Afghanistan?

Same thing with a military tribunal. It's not a kangaroo court in either case. They also have defense attorneys available in military tribunals many of which have similar idealism to civilian attorneys. Contrary to the urban legend.

665 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:21:00pm

re: #660 wozzablog

they are being fed and encouraged by higherups in the GOP...

they should have been ignored. But some guy did a random sampling of Republican congressmen and most of them didn't want to admit, couldn't bring themselves to say or just did not know that Barrack was a US citizen.

That was mike stark from firedoglake, I think, and there was a post here about it. That video was damning. He did one that same week about Dem congressmen running away when asked about the public option IIRC.

666 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:22:53pm

re: #664 Gus 802

The standards and requirements in a civilian criminal case are far, far higher than in any military tribunal. Typically, to win a conviction in a criminal court in the U.S require the highest forms/standards of justice imaginable. (this standard, imo, will have to be decidedly lowered when trying alleged terrorists, who committed their alleged "crimes", oversees. It's one thing to get a Ramzy Y., it's another to get a Saudi national who's never, ever set foot in the U.S.)

667 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:25:59pm

re: #666 J.S.

The standards and requirements in a civilian criminal case are far, far higher than in any military tribunal.

Which is one reason why the Obama admin has adopted the system it has, quite frankly: criminal trials for the cases where we have enough evidence to convict them, military tribunals for the ones where our evidence is weak.

668 Odahi  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:26:09pm

I don't care about the "bow." I would be happy if the administration, and its chief, would afford the same respect to the "other 48%" that they promised to do, and that they afford to foreign leaders. "We won, get over it," is NOT what I'm talking about, either.

669 Odahi  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:28:45pm

If military tribunals (AKA courts martial) are good enough for our military personnel accused of crimes, they should be good enough for accused international criminals and terrorists.

670 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:30:03pm

re: #666 J.S.

The standards and requirements in a civilian criminal case are far, far higher than in any military tribunal. Typically, to win a conviction in a criminal court in the U.S require the highest forms/standards of justice imaginable. (this standard, imo, will have to be decidedly lowered when trying alleged terrorists, who committed their alleged "crimes", oversees. It's one thing to get a Ramzy Y., it's another to get a Saudi national who's never, ever set foot in the U.S.)

Well, for one thing half are facing military tribunals and the other civilian. I can understand the infrastructure and security problems of having the trial in NY NY but they have the full weight of the Feds and almost 8 years of investigations, interrogations, and evidence behind them. They are also going to seek the death penalty.

671 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:31:14pm

re: #667 iceweasel

Which is one reason why the Obama admin has adopted the system it has, quite frankly: criminal trials for the cases where we have enough evidence to convict them, military tribunals for the ones where our evidence is weak.

And that is what he's doing. There will still be military tribunals.

672 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:34:50pm

re: #668 Odahi

I would be happy if the administration, and its chief, would afford the same respect to the "other 48%" that they promised to do, and that they afford to foreign leaders.

it is - unfortunately - a two way street.

what the administration sees are people calling them fascists, stalinists, maoists, racists, biggots, heterophobes, contortionists, blaggards, illegtimate... and a GOP contingent of the legislature that is saying nothing but "no" and is comprised of people who won't go on the record as saying the president was born in the far off nation of Hawaii.

The administration reached out to the republican members of both houses they though could be reasoned with - and got back death panels and psychosis.

There is a lot in what Obama and the house is doing that the GOP could get behind - energy independence, health market liberalisation and defence department reviews of outmoded and worthless technology. Rather than public showings of how the Republican party can "get things done" as a fortaste of competence and goodwill in building back for 2012 - what they are doing speaks nothing of why they deserve any better than they get at the moment. Aside from Olympia Snow, we like her.

673 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:36:25pm

re: #670 Gus 802

Yes. And, how do you spell "Show Trial?"
there was a Democrat (didn't catch the name) who said that there's no way in hell a terrorist would be (upon acquittal) walking down the courthouse steps...ie, there'd be Federal officials who'd immediately detain him. Soo, what's the point of the "trials" once again?

674 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:36:50pm

re: #669 Odahi

presumed international crmininals should be tried in courts. end of.

675 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:40:49pm

btw, there are also how many detainees in Gitmo? obviously, it's more than 10. Apparently, there are provisions whereby some are to be detained, sans trial and sans time limit..ie, indefinite detainment without trial.

676 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:42:18pm

re: #673 J.S.

Yes. And, how do you spell "Show Trial?"
there was a Democrat (didn't catch the name) who said that there's no way in hell a terrorist would be (upon acquittal) walking down the courthouse steps...ie, there'd be Federal officials who'd immediately detain him. Soo, what's the point of the "trials" once again?

OK, it's going to be a show trial and they're all going to be found not guilty and wind up suing the US government for billions of dollars and move back to their respective countries or move to Boca Raton into seaside mansion. And it will all be Obama's fault and the rest of the Marxist, Maoist, Democrats.

//

677 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:44:45pm

re: #676 Gus 802

Well, no. The Show Trials will be like Stalin's Show Trials (Kangaroo courts) whereby the accused will all be found guilty (the guilty verdict is already known prior to the trial)...then they'll be executed.

678 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:45:44pm

re: #476 Sharmuta

Except that I doubt even the kookiest of kooks would agree the President should be punching world leaders in the face.

What I actually think you were doing with that #14 was trolling for a fight with the conservatives on this board.

I thought it was a joke.

679 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:47:08pm

re: #478 HappyWarrior

And if he didn't bow the same nutjobs who are crucifying him in this situation would be calling him a narcissist and disrespectful of world leaders. There is literally nothing Obama can do that will please these people. It's understandable that they were upset about the Saudis. Hell, I think the House of Saud is pardon the pun royally fucked up but it's not as if he was the first president to bow or have a smile for the Saudi kings.

I'd love it if he were the last. But politics being what politics is...

680 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:51:41pm

re: #501 tokyobk

Actually don't know, but I think she was dead. In any case, it is apparent and obvious that it was a huge gap in his life that his father was absent when alive and then dead while he was young.

I wonder what an explanation would be as to why he did not bow to Elizabeth.

I think there actually is a standing protocol that Americans do not bow to the English monarch. Or, his protocol people might have effed up--they don't seem very prepared.

681 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:51:51pm

re: #677 J.S.

Well, no. The Show Trials will be like Stalin's Show Trials (Kangaroo courts) whereby the accused will all be found guilty (the guilty verdict is already known prior to the trial)...then they'll be executed.

Glenn Greenwald agrees with you:

What Obama is saying is this: we'll give real trials only to those detainees we know in advance we will convict. For those we don't think we can convict in a real court, we'll get convictions in the military commissions I'm creating. For those we can't convict even in my military commissions, we'll just imprison them anyway with no charges ("preventively detain" them).

Giving trials to people only when you know for sure, in advance, that you'll get convictions is not due process. Those are called "show trials." In a healthy system of justice, the Government gives everyone it wants to imprison a trial and then imprisons only those whom it can convict. The process is constant (trials), and the outcome varies (convictions or acquittals).

Obama is saying the opposite: in his scheme, it is the outcome that is constant (everyone ends up imprisoned), while the process varies and is determined by the Government (trials for some; military commissions for others; indefinite detention for the rest). The Government picks and chooses which process you get in order to ensure that it always wins. A more warped "system of justice" is hard to imagine.

He also quotes the Chief Prosecutor of the Guantanamo Military Commissions system during the Bush years, making the same point last week in a Wall St. Journal Op-Ed :

Stop and think about that for a moment. In effect, it means that the standard of justice for each detainee will depend in large part upon the government's assessment of how high the prosecution's evidence can jump and which evidentiary bar it can clear.

The evidence likely to clear the high bar gets gold medal justice: a traditional trial in our federal courts. The evidence unable to clear the federal court standard is forced to settle for a military commission trial, a specially created forum that has faltered repeatedly for more than seven years. That is a double standard I suspect we would condemn if it was applied to us. . .

682 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:54:03pm

re: #514 hearmemeow

He is the peasant boy who made good. He read the encyclopedia back to front.

As opposed to the natural born preppie with manners bred into him.

The problem is not that he is a peasant, most of us, including myself, fit into that category. The problem is that he aspires to a blue blood status and now has our whole country dancing the cotillon.

Hooray to the first Non-ugly American!

We have a social divide in American between peasants and preppies? This is new.

683 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:54:43pm

re: #681 iceweasel

I remember early on there were some mixed signals (at the time I thought they were mixed) coming from military attorneys regarding the status of those at Gitmo. Not all and I would have to do some research to find it but it wasn't what most people would expect to hear from a military officer.

684 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:54:49pm

re: #682 SanFranciscoZionist

We have a social divide in American between peasants and preppies? This is new.

No it's not.

685 Odahi  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:56:34pm

My apologies, of course international criminals should be tried in criminal courts. I misspoke.

686 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:56:48pm

And maybe I'm wrong but even with a military tribunal you're innocent until proven guilty. There is a due process. It's not like a John Wayne movie.

687 Odahi  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:58:15pm

Anyone who thinks the Democrats are capable of bipartisanship should look up the record from the firs year or two of the Bush administration.

688 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:58:37pm

re: #681 iceweasel

(this whole thing also makes me sick to my stomach when I think of what this might translate into -- ie, the potential weakening or suborning of certain standard principles of U.S. justice -- that is, in terms of the domestic criminal justice system which has been, traditionally, set up for standing proudly for the rights of the accused...)

689 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:58:58pm

re: #655 J.S.

One may be angry and feel (really, really feel with an intensity of emotion) that X committed crime Y, but criminal prosecutions are all about the evidence, not about your personal feelings.(no matter how intense).

The Washington Post did a good piece debunking the myths of the potential trial.

690 Cato the Elder  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 6:59:43pm

re: #684 Cato the Elder

No it's not.

To amplify: Anyone who thinks class is not an operative factor in American life probably subscribes to the "we're not an empire, nossir" line of mythology, too.

691 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:00:02pm

re: #683 Gus 802

I remember early on there were some mixed signals (at the time I thought they were mixed) coming from military attorneys regarding the status of those at Gitmo. Not all and I would have to do some research to find it but it wasn't what most people would expect to hear from a military officer.

Pretty much immediately upon election they began signaling they'd need to backtrack on the year deadline for closing Gitmo. It's a huge clusterfuck. We've got people who are obviously guilty and can't be convicted but can't be let go, people who are a little guilty and should have been convicted seven years ago, people who shouldn't be there at all-- it's a huge mess. I loathe the idea of the differently tiered justice system but it's very difficult to see how it should be handled.

692 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:01:13pm

re: #689 Cineaste

I read that article earlier today...(i don't think they even began to touch on the problematic features.)

693 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:01:47pm

re: #688 J.S.

(this whole thing also makes me sick to my stomach when I think of what this might translate into -- ie, the potential weakening or suborning of certain standard principles of U.S. justice -- that is, in terms of the domestic criminal justice system which has been, traditionally, set up for standing proudly for the rights of the accused...)

Agreed. There are many disgusting precedents being set.

694 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:01:49pm

re: #692 J.S.

I read that article earlier today...(i don't think they even began to touch on the problematic features.)

do tell

695 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:04:02pm

re: #689 Cineaste

The Washington Post did a good piece debunking the myths of the potential trial.

I thought this one was important:

Four: The transfer of Mohammed to a federal civilian court is a concession of defeat by the government and a soft-on-terror approach to suspects. Fact: The Bush administration tried to prosecute these people in military tribunals but wasn't able to come up with a set of rules that were deemed constitutional. As a result, six years after Mohammed was apprehended, he still hasn't been convicted. A civilian trial is the best chance of ensuring conviction and sentencing. I don't consider that a defeat. I consider it progress. We are one step closer to the end of this guy's story. Remember, too, that the Republican senators who are crying loudest now about this civilian trial were the ones who precluded the use of military tribunals by insisting that they be constitutionally unfair to defendants.
696 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:04:16pm

re: #691 iceweasel

Pretty much immediately upon election they began signaling they'd need to backtrack on the year deadline for closing Gitmo. It's a huge clusterfuck. We've got people who are obviously guilty and can't be convicted but can't be let go, people who are a little guilty and should have been convicted seven years ago, people who shouldn't be there at all-- it's a huge mess. I loathe the idea of the differently tiered justice system but it's very difficult to see how it should be handled.

Many of us expected it to be closed by now. I never thought Gitmo was the problem. The problem was indefinite detention and not bringing them to trial in either a civil or military trial. Gitmo could still be used as a detention center and just take it from there.

697 Ms. MacIceweasel  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:05:52pm

re: #696 Gus 802

Many of us expected it to be closed by now. I never thought Gitmo was the problem. The problem was indefinite detention and not bringing them to trial in either a civil or military trial. Gitmo could still be used as a detention center and just take it from there.

Yes, exactly. Closing the physical facility of Gitmo is of purely symbolic value and that's what they're rushing. The real issue of course is the legal and civil liberties limbo they've been held in. And that's only barely inching forward.

698 Locker  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:09:16pm

re: #14 Jimmah

Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!". Then he'd have marched straight out the room again (after figuring out where the door was, of course)

Haven't been around all weekend but I logged in special just to upding you for the one Jimmah. Hilarious... especially the Team America quote.

699 J.S.  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:10:09pm

re: #694 Cineaste

For starters, just how do you suppose an alleged criminal is subsequently investigated? on what grounds? (on the actual alleged crime said to have been committed? or, say, oversees, you hear rumors -- alleged plans that Individual X intends to do Y, but hasn't actually done it yet -- then, how is Individual X brought into the U.S criminal justice system? do you see potential problems here?)

700 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:13:43pm

re: #697 iceweasel

Yes, exactly. Closing the physical facility of Gitmo is of purely symbolic value and that's what they're rushing. The real issue of course is the legal and civil liberties limbo they've been held in. And that's only barely inching forward.

It's inching forward but just barely. The Nuremberg Trials were assembled and held in record speed compared to what they're doing now. But that's just a reflection of society today in which everything takes a long time.

The previous administration knew this would be inherited by the next administration. The same applies with this administration. If Obama is not re-elected in 2012 then the policies will again change if these prosecutions and trials are not held within a reasonable time frame.

Indefinite detention is not an option and everyone knew that was the case even the former administration. It's time to stop procrastinating.

701 Jimmah  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:18:04pm

re: #698 Locker

Haven't been around all weekend but I logged in special just to upding you for the one Jimmah. Hilarious... especially the Team America quote.

Cheers, Locker! This tune has given Ice and I much pleasure recently...

702 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:20:36pm

re: #687 Odahi

yup. but they came together for No Child Left Behind - which put them back on the map in terms of respectibillity. They also came into line with Bush over Iraq.

They were fully behind the Afghan invasion in 2001...

The Dems were more behind Bush on immigration reform than the GOP was.

They did co-operate.

703 hurricane_jimmy  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:23:25pm

Obama looked like a clown. It's obviously not on par with his pushing for the ridiculous House health care "reform" bill, but he still looked like an ass.

704 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:33:24pm

re: #699 J.S.

For starters, just how do you suppose an alleged criminal is subsequently investigated? on what grounds? (on the actual alleged crime said to have been committed? or, say, oversees, you hear rumors -- alleged plans that Individual X intends to do Y, but hasn't actually done it yet -- then, how is Individual X brought into the U.S criminal justice system? do you see potential problems here?)

What on earth are you talking about? Have you not heard of Ramzi Yousef or the dozens of other foreign-based terrorists we have successfully picked up and prosecuted in the US?

705 Cineaste  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:34:00pm

re: #698 Locker

Haven't been around all weekend but I logged in special just to upding you for the one Jimmah. Hilarious... especially the Team America quote.

you've missed all the fun...

706 HappyWarrior  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 7:42:12pm

re: #679 SanFranciscoZionist

I'd love it if he were the last. But politics being what politics is...

Me too. I admit this is a bit reactionary thinking on my part but I'd be glad if Obama or any future president told the Saudis to go screw themselves since it's obvious that they have no concern what so ever for human rights. If I recall my learning in modern Middle Eastern history correctly, we first started allying with the Saudis during World War II because we needed them as an ally against the Axis.

707 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 8:08:23pm
708 [deleted]  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 8:25:46pm
709 Gus  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 8:31:14pm

re: #708 Seppo

Who cares.

710 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 8:41:58pm

re: #687 Odahi

Anyone who thinks the Democrats are capable of bipartisanship should look up the record from the firs year or two of the Bush administration.

You mean those first two years that Bush vetoed no legislation and signed into law his signature tax reform, the Patriot Act, No Child Left Behind Bill, the Homeland Security Act, and the authorization to use force in Iraq, all passed with wide bipartisan support.

Yeah, those Democrats were real obstructionists.

711 Alan K. Henderson  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:19:22pm

Whatever country I'm in, I'd be leery of making 90-degrees bows if there are cameras behind me :-)

Thomas Lifson has a pretty decent analysis - the bow violates Japanese protocols. Money quote: "The one thing that virtually everyone who teaches bowing etiquette stresses is under no circumstance try to combine a bow with a handshake."

Jake Tapper reports a similar analysis. He also gets one matter wrong, the notion that the gesture is precedented. There is a huge difference between a 10-20 degree bow and a 90-degree bow; the body languages are radically different, and only the former maintains eye contact. The latter is how you salute an entire audience after a performance, not how you greet an individual.

712 thefarmer  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:56:42pm

re: #709 Gus 802

Who cares.

Well, obviously a lot of Americans who would like their president not to make such gaffes. Sure, as Charles has pointed out it's not the biggest deal in the world. But certainly Obama is open to criticism on this incident.

Bush often got things wrong in diplomacy, and was roundly criticised, if not crucified. I think the least we can except from OUR representative is to act appropriately. Simply put, Obama didn't.

I think what grates on a lot of folks is his superior attitude. He thinks he can do this "presidency thing" and impress us w/ his brilliance, heck he WON!

My take after reading this thread is that *my head is spinning*. I'm a reader, not a poster, I do understand but some of the regulars need to a another life! That ought to be worth a gazillion down dings, wow, scary sheet.

Obama screwed up, who knows why. Nobody in Japan bows that low unless they are a servant. So if Charles or anyone here thinks thats irrelevant I disagree. Diplomacy is just that, you have to learn the the facts. He and his people have not.

His people didn't and it was vastly inappropriate. To criticize that is not out of line. There were 47 heads of state there and 46 did not bow like this. Pathetic on the part of this administration.

Regards,
T

713 hawaii69  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 10:58:22pm

re: #1 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Don't care at all about this. Nontroversy is right!


Of course it's controversial.

When on a presidential visit to Japan, proper etiquette is to
puke in your hosts lap

714 Alan K. Henderson  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:16:57pm

Two other thoughts cross my mind:

1. The mild bows that various folks have linked - Nixon, Ike, etc. - come across looking like a sort of salute. Obama's looks like either groveling or grandstanding, depending on the (non-Japanese) viewer.

2. Obama's bow makes Akihito look shorter. There may be a faux pas right there :-)

715 thefarmer  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:17:43pm

re: #713 hawaii69

Of course it's controversial.

When on a presidential visit to Japan, proper etiquette is to
puke in your hosts lap

Sure, Bush 41's involuntary vomiting is equal to Obama's ignorance of the world's cultural differences he pretends to be so attuned to.

Somehow I'm not buying that.

T

716 SixDegrees  Sun, Nov 15, 2009 11:41:30pm

re: #711 Alan K. Henderson

I haven't heard a single complaint from Japan over any of this.

By the way, the Emperor screwed up the handshake. Prepare for the collapse of Japan.

717 JohninLondon  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 4:44:38am

re: #703 hurricane_jimmy

Obama looked like a clown. It's obviously not on par with his pushing for the ridiculous House health care "reform" bill, but he still looked like an ass.

I agree.

Obama looked like John Cleese in Fawlty Towers being obsequious and smarmy.

After a series of previous gaffes in dealings with other world leaders, you'd think people would advise the President to be a bit more careful. A slight nod to the Emperor was all that was needed.

...

I thought the whole Dem idea of electing him was to let people have a President who did not make people cringe when they saw him in action. But when away from the teleprompter, he provides endless cringe moments.

718 deacon  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 6:35:39am

re: #711 Alan K. Henderson

Whatever country I'm in, I'd be leery of making 90-degrees bows if there are cameras behind me :-)

Thomas Lifson has a pretty decent analysis - the bow violates Japanese protocols. Money quote: "The one thing that virtually everyone who teaches bowing etiquette stresses is under no circumstance try to combine a bow with a handshake."

Jake Tapper reports a similar analysis. He also gets one matter wrong, the notion that the gesture is precedented. There is a huge difference between a 10-20 degree bow and a 90-degree bow; the body languages are radically different, and only the former maintains eye contact. The latter is how you salute an entire audience after a performance, not how you greet an individual.

In the Japanese culture, the angle of the bow is very important. The angle of the bow differenciates the different level between people. Obama's bow, as a leader and respectful of Japanese custom, should have been an equal angle as the emperor. Instead, his much deeper bow indicated that he considers himself to be on a much lower station.

719 Honorary Yooper  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 7:15:10am

re: #14 Jimmah

Whereas Bush, like a REAL president, would have marched over and punched him right out before screaming "America Fuck Yeah!". Then he'd have marched straight out the room again (after figuring out where the door was, of course)

Idiot. Bush would've done the traditional Japanese bow just the same. But, I cannot account for the blinders on your own eyes.

720 Sabba Hillel  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 7:43:48am

I have seen several articles about the Japanese reaction. Apparently (at least according to a number of articles), the Japanese media were careful to show only the (polite) bow to the Empress and did not show the (obsequious) bow to the Emperor. Not being Japanese, I can only say how the body language looked to an American. However, if the office of protocol set it up, Obama should replace them all.

721 Sabba Hillel  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 7:53:15am

[Link: blogs.abcnews.com...]

"This picture shows two things," my friend writes.

"1) The 'right' is wrong about Obama's bow.

"2) The 'left' is wrong about Obama's bow.

"His bow is neither (1) unprecedented nor (2) a sign of cultural understanding.

"At their 1971 meeting in Alaska, the first visit of a Japanese Emperor to America, President Nixon bowed and referred to Emperor Hirohito and his wife repeatedly as 'Your Imperial Majesties.'"

(See that picture HERE.)

"Yet, (and?) Nixon gets the bow right. Slight arch from the waist hands at his side.

"Obama's handshake/forward lurch was so jarring and inappropriate it recalls Bush's back-rub of Merkel.

"Kyodo News is running his appropriate and reciprocated nod and shake with the Empress, certainly to show the president as dignified, and not in the form of a first year English teacher trying to impress with Karate Kid-level knowledge of Japanese customs.

"The bow as he performed did not just display weakness in Red State terms, but evoked weakness in Japanese terms...The last thing the Japanese want or need is a weak looking American president and, again, in all ways, he unintentionally played that part.

"BTW, Obama's bow at Suntory Hall was much better. Correct angle, slight bow. His hands were wrong but the physical tone was correct and appropriate.

722 MinisterO  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 9:20:49am

re: #14 Jimmah

That was funny but don't play innocent. Surely you knew that Team ODS is incapable of recognizing that they, and not the former president, are the butt of the joke.

723 Jimmah  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 12:27:07pm

re: #719 Honorary Yooper

Idiot. Bush would've done the traditional Japanese bow just the same. But, I cannot account for the blinders on your own eyes.

Pretending to misunderstand my post at any stage in this thread was a tad desperate, at this point in the thread, after all of the explanations and clarifications for the benefit of those whose brains are allegedly unequipped to detect hu-mour it's completely ridiculous.

And, no I won't be getting into an ad hom slinging contest with you, (or Sharm who updinged you for that). So much for being concerned about civility on the boards...

724 Jimmah  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 12:33:21pm

re: #722 MinisterO

That was funny but don't play innocent. Surely you knew that Team ODS is incapable of recognizing that they, and not the former president, are the butt of the joke.

You got me there. At the very least it was horrible of me not to think so little of them, apparently!

725 Alan K. Henderson  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 2:01:04pm

I noticed something else about the bow. Note the odd angle of the back. I'm the same height as Obama, and to recreate that posture I have to bend the waist and hunch the shoulders forward. A theatrical performer's deep bow (the closest parallel to Obama's in form and, IMO, in spirit) should keep the shoulders square with the hips so that the back remains straight.

Not anywhere as near as big a deal as international protocols, but these days cameras are everywhere - politicians should put some effort into not looking graceless in public.

726 Jerusalemyte  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 3:45:41pm

Yawn!

727 speakingtruthtogroupthink  Mon, Nov 16, 2009 7:42:45pm

The simple exaggerated deep bow/handshake was a disappointment. The rumor on the net was that he was finally going to showcase the dreaded curtsy/fist-bump. Oh well.

728 Flavia  Tue, Nov 17, 2009 10:34:13pm

re: #279 acwgusa

I agree that its good that its good that we finally reached a place were America elected a black president and I should have worded my comment a little better, because I came off like a foaming racist. I wanted to convey that I hoped Obama was elected by his character, and that his skin color wasn't a consideration, and I blew it.

Actually, I got your message.

And, to the actual subject of the thread: my real beef w/the President's bow is that I think it is too low for a Japanese bow. You are supposed to merely bow until your eyes can see your feet, not to a near-45 degree angle. I have even heard that a very low bow is considered being smart-alecky - but I know that HM didn't think Obama was being any such thing (& we all know it, too). And yes, I am nitpicking, but that was my only quibble w/what Obama did.

(And to those who want to pick on Bush for how he treated the Saudis - it was all diplomacy! Yes, the kissing and the hand-holding - that's what men do in those countries. And they treated him with the utmost courtesy - no matter how goofy it may have looked to us. Having him hold that falcon (for one egregious example) was a compliment - falconry is still the sport of kings over there, and only great leaders are supposed to have them. No, I wasn't happy that he felt it necessary to bow to their king, but I grit my teeth and accepted it - same as I will when Obama undoubtedly will do so.)

729 newscaper  Wed, Nov 18, 2009 11:15:42pm

I don't care for the bow.

Don't have a problem with the basic more token bow that is typically given over there (when in Rome... up to a point), but this was not the modest bow between approximate equals who are not familiar. Rather it was the deep bow of an inferior to a superior.

The issues are reciprocity, depth, symmetry and order/simultaneity.
It's Japan 101, sheesh.

I've been to Japan on business, and this was like the one the hotel housekeepers give the paying guests -- not like what you'd see between two heads of state.

Not a huge episode in the scheme of things, but *is* inappropriate and somewhat embarrassing.

By contrast, see the video dug up of Nixon greeting Mao -- Tricky Dick pretty much just moves the head and shoulders, nothing like this.

About the crack above wrt this contradicting Obama's alleged narcissism -- it's not that simple. Doing this did make Obama the center of attention as he thought to amateurishly show just how culturally enlightened he was.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Account Settings Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

A kind of crazed and demented watchdog.

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

MichaelJ
Consumers Cooler to Amazon Prime Than Thought, Report Says
5 minutes ago
Views: 18 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Turnabout is Fair Play
Chavez Allies Attack New Opponent Capriles as Jewish, Gay
21 minutes ago
Views: 17 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Bob Dillon
Radiation Generates Cancer Stem Cells From Less Aggressive Breast Cancer Cells
1 hour, 21 minutes ago
Views: 35 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Bob Dillon
Mossad Bolsters Activity in Tunisia
1 hour, 40 minutes ago
Views: 48 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Bob Dillon
CA Prison Officers Spent More Than $1 Million on Political Advice
1 hour, 51 minutes ago
Views: 35 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Bob Dillon
China Withdraws Support to Assad
1 hour, 57 minutes ago
Views: 51 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Bob Dillon
'Assad Using Chemical Warfare in Homs Attack
2 hours, 1 minute ago
Views: 41 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Bob Dillon
Weapons: Neutering Ammonium Nitrate
2 hours, 11 minutes ago
Views: 45 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Randall Gross
Stabenow Up 14 on Hoekstra as Ad Backfires - Public Policy Polling
2 hours, 47 minutes ago
Views: 96 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Randall Gross
Youth for Western Civilization Takes 'Patriot' Plunge
2 hours, 57 minutes ago
Views: 90 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

 Frank says:

Never stop and keep going -- Giving advice to young musicians. early 80's interview with pennsylvania state police officer whom is also a zappa fan. originally to be shown to local high school students of the area but frank ended up on the subject of politics and you can just imagine why the kids never seen this video.