Beware of Science Fiction!

Charles Johnsonfollow me on twitter
Science • Wed Jan 6, 2010 at 8:12 pm PST • Views: 520

You have got to be kidding.

Tonight we learn that the religious right isn’t just anti-science — they’re anti-science fiction too: Beware of Science Fiction.

Science fiction takes the reader into a strange world without God. Oh, there might be “a god,” a “force,” but it is definitely not the God of the Bible, and the prominent names in this field are atheists. …

Science fiction is intimately associated with Darwinian evolution. Sagan and Asimov, for example, were prominent evolutionary scientists. Sci-fi arose in the late 19th and early 20th century as a product of an evolutionary worldview that denies the Almighty Creator. In fact, evolution IS the pre-eminent science fiction. Beware!

May I have another ibuprofen, please?

(Hat tip: PZ Myers.)

Advertisement

530 comments

  • Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 darthstar  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:14:54pm

Teh stoopid, it burns.

2 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:15:15pm

I assume I should not try to discuss The Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler with these people?

3 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:15:44pm

They sure as hell don't want anyone to have any fun at all! What a ludicrous load of Bantha poo.

4 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:15:50pm

Dave: Open the pod bay doors, Hal.
Hal: Why don't you pray? Maybe your god will miracle them open.

5 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:16:09pm

Something Stupid This Way Comes

6 kreyagg  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:16:57pm

Obviously they prefer fantasy.

7 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:17:02pm

I suppose the jump from satanist fantasy to secular humanist scifi wasn't that far...

8 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:17:03pm

Tribbles are Satan's tools.

9 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:17:24pm

They definitely never read A Canticle for Leibowitz.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

10 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:17:57pm

re: #6 kreyagg

Obviously they prefer fantasy.

Actually many of them love Tolkien, which I find Bizarre.

11 wee fury  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:18:14pm

Stiflers of imagination.
My spit be upon you.

12 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:18:37pm

re: #10 Thanos

Well he was (kinda) Christian! That makes everything okay.

13 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:18:46pm

re: #10 Thanos

I think it's the whole "Men of the West" theme.

14 RobRace  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:18:52pm

May the Schwartz be with you!

15 akarra  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:19:02pm

C.S. Lewis has science fiction - fiction that a few Christians I know like, actually:

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

16 kreyagg  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:19:07pm

What's poor Orson Scott Card to do? The other bigots won't read his stories.

17 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:19:08pm

Once again, I will never understand this world of constant fear that these people live in.

Also, how pathetically weak is your faith in a deity have to be if a work of fiction is a threat to it? Their small, petty minds make no sense to me.

18 rwmofo  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:19:09pm

So who is David Cloud? Plaid shirt guy or out-of-control sideburns guy?

19 Van Helsing  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:19:10pm

Nice picture of Asimov, though.

20 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:20:08pm

Weak faith needs to lean on a scapegoat.

21 The Sanity Inspector  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:20:19pm

You can have my Ringworld Trilogy when you pry it out of my cold dead hands.

22 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:20:33pm

re: #15 akarra

I'd say Out of the Silent Planet, altho' great, is hardly Science Fiction (even by our current loose standards). Its fantasy in space.

Good fantasy in space tho'!

23 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:20:55pm

re: #17 Lidane

Once again, I will never understand this world of constant fear that these people live in.

Also, how pathetically weak is your faith in a deity have to be if a work of fiction is a threat to it? Their small, petty minds make no sense to me.

Think that's bad? Just wait until you see their reaction when we really do make first contact.

24 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:21:07pm

I'm tempted to suggest "On Venus Have We Got A Rabbi", except that they would undoubtedly side with the people who say that the brown couch pillows with tentacles aren't really Jews.

Fine story, anyway. The backstory about what happened to the State of Israel is almost worth the price of admission.

25 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:21:54pm

re: #10 Thanos

Actually many of them love Tolkien, which I find Bizarre.

C.S. Lewis wrote some science fiction. I wonder what they make of That Hideous Strength.

Or for that matter, what about Madeleine L'Engle?

26 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:22:29pm

re: #23 Varek Raith

I hope I'm alive to see that. Not just because witnessing first contact would be awesome, but watching all those people have all their illusions shattered would be a sight to behold.

27 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:22:51pm

Isaac Asimov was a secular humanist, and also one of the first well known figures to speak out against Global Warming.

/see science fiction is the tool of the devil!

Harlan Ellison wrote a short story cycle called "Deathbird Stories" in which one tale was an allegorical creation tale, and Satan was the good guy representing science and knowledge, but he had just received several thousand years of bad press.

28 Van Helsing  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:23:01pm

re: #24 SanFranciscoZionist

I'm tempted to suggest "On Venus Have We Got A Rabbi", except that they would undoubtedly side with the people who say that the brown couch pillows with tentacles aren't really Jews.

Fine story, anyway. The backstory about what happened to the State of Israel is almost worth the price of admission.

I suggest Philip Jose Farmer, "Jesus on Mars".
That ought to bust a blood vessel or two.

29 cliffster  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:23:13pm

re: #25 SanFranciscoZionist

C.S. Lewis wrote some science fiction. I wonder what they make of That Hideous Strength.

Or for that matter, what about Madeleine L'Engle?

I want to make a tesseract. Or however you spell it.

30 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:23:20pm

re: #13 jaunte

I think it's the whole "Men of the West" theme.

I'm just laying in popcorn for the first time the Calormenes show up in the series they're doing of Lewis' Narnia books. Zee pundit fights, she will be amazing.

31 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:24:06pm

re: #27 Thanos

That was in Heinleins Job too, wasn't it?

32 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:24:07pm

re: #30 SanFranciscoZionist

I'm just laying in popcorn for the first time the Calormenes show up in the series they're doing of Lewis' Narnia books. Zee pundit fights, she will be amazing.

Lol, that'll be fun.

33 avanti  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:24:21pm

I just don't grok the concept.

34 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:24:51pm

re: #31 windsagio

That was in Heinleins Job too, wasn't it?

Maybeso, that's one Heinlein book I haven't read.

35 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:25:43pm

re: #29 cliffster

I want to make a tesseract. Or however you spell it.

That looks right.

At the middle school I used to teach at, the sixth grade teacher had the kids read A Wrinkle In Time as their religion class book.

A Swiftly Tilting Planet, the third in that series, is spectacular, and far less popular than the first two.

36 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:26:02pm

re: #34 Thanos

Its really excellent. Its probably my favorite of his stuff.

37 political lunatic  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:26:12pm

These IDiots will not get my Futurama boxsets from me unless they pry them from my cold, dead hands. How do you argue with crazy people who believe they are influenced by God without losing a little faith in humanity?

38 rwmofo  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:26:23pm

Man it's cold out. I think I'll go watch a science fiction movie. Just don't tell "Dark Cloud."

39 Baier  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:26:28pm

I don't think I would have made it through Jr. High School without science fiction.

40 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:26:40pm

re: #36 windsagio

Its really excellent. Its probably my favorite of his stuff.

I'll pick it up on your recommendation, I've read most of his others.

41 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:26:57pm

I have limited Heinlein tolerance. Some of it is awesome, but the man had some ISSUES about women.

42 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:26:59pm

Am I going to die then. I watched two episodes of "Dollhouse" just now. One of my step-critters bought me season one of "Dollhouse" for Christmas, and we watch episode one and two tonight. The step-critter has already seen season one, but I think it was purchased to preempt me making them watch season six of LOST when it comes on starting Feb. 2nd.

Up to this point I've never liked anything Whedon has created. This "Dollhouse" was much more adult and clever than some of his other stuff.

What I didn't like... I wanted more backstory, right up front about "Echo." Right now, she is as much a blank slate as the rest of the "Dollhouse" Actives, and I don't care much about her as of yet. I wanted some back story hook NOW that would make me say "Goi Echo, find out who you are... what you are... what you did... what's happening..."

But not yet. Otherwise, kind of clever story idea.

43 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:27:40pm

re: #42 Walter L. Newton

Am I going to die then. I watched two episodes of "Dollhouse" just now. One of my step-critters bought me season one of "Dollhouse" for Christmas, and we watch episode one and two tonight. The step-critter has already seen season one, but I think it was purchased to preempt me making them watch season six of LOST when it comes on starting Feb. 2nd.

Up to this point I've never liked anything Whedon has created. This "Dollhouse" was much more adult and clever than some of his other stuff.

What I didn't like... I wanted more backstory, right up front about "Echo." Right now, she is as much a blank slate as the rest of the "Dollhouse" Actives, and I don't care much about her as of yet. I wanted some back story hook NOW that would make me say "Goi Echo, find out who you are... what you are... what you did... what's happening..."

But not yet. Otherwise, kind of clever story idea.

Whoa... I forgot it's Dollhouse night... be back later all.

44 zephirus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:27:42pm

Asimov was a biochemist. Sagan was an Astrophysicist. They were not "evolutionary scientists". A desperate attempt to link atheist scientists to evil Darwinism.

45 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:27:49pm

Now, what about Firefly? That has some interesting faith issues.

46 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:28:15pm

I'm moving to France.

47 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:28:26pm

re: #43 Thanos

Whoa... I forgot it's Dollhouse night... be back later all.

Wait a minute, the new episodes aren't till Friday, nvrmind

48 avanti  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:28:42pm

re: #39 Baier

I don't think I would have made it through Jr. High School without science fiction.

Me either. I recall sitting down with a good Sci Fi novel in the afternoon and reading into the early AM just because I could not put it down without finishing.

49 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:28:46pm

F*I*C*T*I*O*N

Writing about something that hasn't actually happened to illustrate what the author feels is a true point.

What do they make of the pivotal scene in HP7 happening in King's Cross Station, in a chapter actually titled that?

50 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:29:20pm

re: #37 political lunatic

They should love Futurama, it has the Devil and damnation as recurring themes!

*couldn't find good quality with the footage :(

51 [deleted]  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:29:21pm
52 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:29:23pm

re: #46 Gus 802

I'm moving to France.

Bring us back some pastries, 'kay?

53 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:29:46pm

Actually, if I was going to recommend a story from the Wandering Stars anthologies, I would say "Tauf Alef", by Phyllis Gottlieb. Amazing piece.

54 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:29:53pm

re: #52 EmmmieG

Bring us back some pastries, 'kay?

Wine and cheese?

55 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:29:57pm

re: #39 Baier

I don't think I would have made it through Jr. High School without science fiction.

You must be younger than I. I can clearly remember that as a kid I didn't casually tell people I liked to read science fiction. It was considered kind of weird, if not a type of superstition, by many.

56 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:30:21pm

re: #51 LeonidasOfSparta

TL;DR.

57 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:30:22pm

Speeding-reading before the flounces destructs.

58 avanti  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:30:34pm

re: #44 zephirus

Asimov was a biochemist. Sagan was an Astrophysicist. They were not "evolutionary scientists". A desperate attempt to link atheist scientists to evil Darwinism.

Yes, but they were both intellectual, pin headed, elitists./

59 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:30:39pm

re: #45 SanFranciscoZionist

Now, what about Firefly? That has some interesting faith issues.

The Stargate series was rife with it.

60 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:30:43pm

re: #51 LeonidasOfSparta

It's co, not ca.

61 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:30:48pm

Two of my favorite authors have a strange knack for working both religion and fable into their stories, the first would be Gene Wolfe and the second Roger Zelazny.

62 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:30:57pm

re: #51 LeonidasOfSparta

You will not be missed.

63 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:31:08pm

Speaking of science fiction... we're being vistited by phantom zips...
[Link: www.washingtonexaminer.com...]

64 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:31:11pm

re: #56 Varek Raith

I know its dirty pool, but I love nicks that tell you EXACTLY when someone registered >>

65 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:31:40pm

A sudden shortening of the space-time continuum!

66 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:31:41pm

re: #54 Gus 802

Wine and cheese?

Cheese maybe. But definitely pastries.

67 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:31:41pm

re: #57 EmmmieG

Speeding-reading before the flounces destructs.

I think if you can see it, it stays until you refresh the page, no matter what happens on Charles' end. Could be wrong, but I've never seen one just 'vanish'.

68 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:32:06pm

pfft. Go tell the Spartans.

69 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:32:11pm

PIMF... ' visited'.

70 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:32:15pm

re: #51 LeonidasOfSparta

"You can Flounce if you want to,
You can leave all of us behind.
'Cause my friends don't flounce,
and so if you flounce,
well, you're no friend of mine!"

71 avanti  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:32:22pm

re: #51 LeonidasOfSparta

Must have opened a worm hole to the stalker blog for a moment.

72 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:32:34pm

re: #62 Gus 802

You will not be missed.

Without asking for quotes, I'm curious what I missed.

73 cliffster  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:32:35pm

re: #35 SanFranciscoZionist

That looks right.

At the middle school I used to teach at, the sixth grade teacher had the kids read A Wrinkle In Time as their religion class book.

A Swiftly Tilting Planet, the third in that series, is spectacular, and far less popular than the first two.

Those books had me spellbound when I was a kid. You may have just inspired me to go back and re-read them.

74 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:32:38pm

re: #51 LeonidasOfSparta

You misspelt "cajones."

75 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:33:02pm

re: #67 SanFranciscoZionist
Yes.. at least here, it lives until you click a new post or refresh.

76 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:33:04pm

Was that our first SF Flounce?

77 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:33:46pm

re: #68 Thanos

pfft. Go tell the Spartans.

"Tourist, if you come to Sparta, tell them the last of the butterflies died fighting the Byzantines."

OK, NO ONE will get that. From an Ephraim Kishon book about travelling through Europe with his wife. He carves it on a tree, after being led across half of Rhodes by a tour guides who promises them a valley with a million butterflies.

78 Learned Mother of Zion  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:33:52pm

Jews in Space!

79 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:33:56pm

re: #76 Thanos

Spartan Flounce.

80 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:34:03pm

Entirely too wordy

81 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:34:18pm

re: #76 Thanos

Was that our first SF Flounce?

Definitely not the first flounce related to Carl Sagan. He's a real target for these nutjobs.

82 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:34:24pm

re: #79 jaunte

Spartan Flounce.

Too flattering

83 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:34:46pm

re: #71 avanti

Must have opened a worm hole to the stalker blog for a moment.

I'll send a prode to the other end of the wormhole to investigate. The hole may lead to Borg space, though. Send message to the Enterprise-E and tell Picard to get here at maximum warp!

//

84 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:35:22pm

re: #72 Naso Tang

Without asking for quotes, I'm curious what I missed.

re: #74 Walter L. Newton

You misspelt "cajones."

I think that sums it all up.

85 stevemcg  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:35:37pm

Hadn't thought about Isaac Asimov in years. Forgotten how great the Foundation Series was. And it wasn't even dripping with aliens and stuff. In fact, I don't remember any aliens. I happen to find a lot of sci-fi really stupid, but just because it 'snot my bag, WTH, to each his own. I also remember how astrologists used to drive Asimov bonkers. I would have loved to seen him tear into GW deniers.

86 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:35:41pm

re: #83 Dark_Falcon

I'll send a prode to the other end of the wormhole to investigate. The hole may lead to Borg space, though. Send message to the Enterprise-E and tell Picard to get here at maximum warp!

//

Why? So he can critique the flounce? As a soliloquy, it's not much of an art form.

87 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:35:53pm

re: #74 Walter L. Newton
(Walter showing off another one of those strong British verb forms).
:)

88 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:36:20pm

re: #79 jaunte

Spartan Flounce.

"SPARTANS! TONIGHT WE FLOUNCE IN HELL!"

/300

89 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:36:26pm

re: #83 Dark_Falcon

I'll send a prode to the other end of the wormhole to investigate. The hole may lead to Borg space, though. Send message to the Enterprise-E and tell Picard to get here at maximum warp!

//

Heh. Set phasers on shun!

90 Interesting Times  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:36:40pm

n00b question: any backstory behind how "this site used to be great, now it sucks" troll posts came to be referred to as "flounces"?

91 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:36:56pm

re: #83 Dark_Falcon

I'll send a probe to the other end of the wormhole to investigate. The hole may lead to Borg space, though. Send message to the Enterprise-E and tell Picard to get here at maximum warp!

//

PIMF

92 MandyManners  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:36:56pm

I think it was Asimov who lead me to giving up sci-fi. IIRC, in his Foundation books, the women STILL were the ones doing all the cooking and cleaning.

93 rwmofo  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:37:13pm

Those flouncers give new a meaning to hit-and-run. At least he kept it Rated G.

94 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:03pm

re: #90 publicityStunted

n00b question: any backstory behind how "this site used to be great, now it sucks" troll posts came to be referred to as "flounces"?

Encyclopedia Dramatica - Flounce.

95 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:05pm

re: #92 MandyManners

I think it was Asimov who lead me to giving up sci-fi. IIRC, in his Foundation books, the women STILL were the ones doing all the cooking and cleaning.

No kidding... how could you call that fiction? (*bonk*)

96 celticdragon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:06pm

I'm going to sit down and read Heinlein's Starship Troopers for the unpteenth time just to spite those fuckers!

97 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:12pm

re: #84 SanFranciscoZionist

I think that sums it all up.

Oh. Not even original.

98 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:29pm

re: #92 MandyManners

Product of the times tho', you have to accept a certain amount of that crap from the 60's and before, or you miss out on a LOT of good writing.

Tolkien women weren't exactly strong and outgoing hero's either...

99 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:29pm

With a username like that he is also doubtless one of those "molon labe!" (Μολὼν λαβέ )freaks.

100 celticdragon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:34pm

re: #88 Dark_Falcon

"SPARTANS! TONIGHT WE FLOUNCE IN HELL!"

/300

Awesome sauce ;)

101 MandyManners  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:38:40pm

re: #95 Walter L. Newton

No kidding... how could you call that fiction? (*bonk*)

To me, it showed he lacked imagination.

102 stevemcg  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:39:03pm

re: #92 MandyManners

I didn't notice that. Now that you mention it, I can only think of one significant female character.

103 Mad Al-Jaffee  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:39:06pm

I guess they don't celebrate Life Day.

104 MandyManners  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:39:12pm

re: #98 windsagio

Product of the times tho', you have to accept a certain amount of that crap from the 60's and before, or you miss out on a LOT of good writing.

Tolkien women weren't exactly strong and outgoing hero's either...

Well, I wasn't ready to accept it.

105 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:39:39pm

re: #92 MandyManners

I think it was Asimov who lead me to giving up sci-fi. IIRC, in his Foundation books, the women STILL were the ones doing all the cooking and cleaning.

The 50s and 60s (and 70s, and well into the 80s) specfic greats were very much men of their time. That is, they really, really marginalized women with a condescending that edges on loathing I don't quite understand. There's nothing quite like it before or after in literature that I've found. I take it in the doses I can handle it.

106 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:39:43pm

re: #92 MandyManners

I think it was Asimov who lead me to giving up sci-fi. IIRC, in his Foundation books, the women STILL were the ones doing all the cooking and cleaning.

In L'Engle, Mom is cooking the beef stew...over a bunsen burner...in her lab.

I cannot express what Wrinkle in Time meant to me as a brainy, geeky 13 year-old.

107 rwmofo  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:39:44pm

re: #92 MandyManners

I think it was Asimov who lead me to giving up sci-fi. IIRC, in his Foundation books, the women STILL were the ones doing all the cooking and cleaning.

Maybe Asimov was a lousy cook.

*Ducks*

108 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:39:45pm

re: #85 stevemcg

Hadn't thought about Isaac Asimov in years. Forgotten how great the Foundation Series was. And it wasn't even dripping with aliens and stuff. In fact, I don't remember any aliens. I happen to find a lot of sci-fi really stupid, but just because it 'snot my bag, WTH, to each his own. I also remember how astrologists used to drive Asimov bonkers. I would have loved to seen him tear into GW deniers.

Isaac in 1988 on AGW:

109 avanti  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:40:03pm

re: #92 MandyManners

I think it was Asimov who lead me to giving up sci-fi. IIRC, in his Foundation books, the women STILL were the ones doing all the cooking and cleaning.

I have a funny line related to that, but I'm too scared to post it with Mandy in earshot.

110 MandyManners  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:40:05pm

I feel as if I just put a turd into the punch bowl.

111 zephirus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:40:17pm

re: #83 Dark_Falcon

Remind Picard that the positronic antigravity velocerator will decrease the singularity to a class 9 where it will be navigable.

112 prairiefire  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:40:19pm

re: #70 Dark_Falcon

Upding for great 80's tune reminder.

113 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:40:32pm

re: #90 publicityStunted
I don't think it's indigenous to LGF... internet speak for a huffy departure.

114 MandyManners  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:40:42pm

re: #105 SanFranciscoZionist

The 50s and 60s (and 70s, and well into the 80s) specfic greats were very much men of their time. That is, they really, really marginalized women with a condescending that edges on loathing I don't quite understand. There's nothing quite like it before or after in literature that I've found. I take it in the doses I can handle it.

Back-lash?

115 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:40:51pm

208 posts to go, for lucky number 8,000,000!
I wonder what the winner gets?
A toaster? A toster Oven, or, toasted?

116 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:41:23pm

re: #85 stevemcg

Hadn't thought about Isaac Asimov in years. Forgotten how great the Foundation Series was. And it wasn't even dripping with aliens and stuff. In fact, I don't remember any aliens. I happen to find a lot of sci-fi really stupid, but just because it 'snot my bag, WTH, to each his own. I also remember how astrologists used to drive Asimov bonkers. I would have loved to seen him tear into GW deniers.

There were no aliens in the Foundation universe that I recall. It was all for US. One would almost think it should have been a favorite of the creationists if only for that.

117 MandyManners  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:41:28pm

Have a good night, Lizards!

118 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:41:37pm

re: #104 MandyManners

fair enough. Poeple like what they like.


It is interesting tho', how things like that change over the years.

119 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:41:44pm

re: #105 SanFranciscoZionist

Robert Jordan's women are strong. Of course, they're pretty much all the same character with a different name, and slightly different physical description, but he sure likes uppity wimmin.

120 celticdragon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:42:00pm

Good night fellow scaly ones :)

121 Walter L. Newton  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:42:01pm

It's one degree (f) below zero... I'm going to snuggle up under the electric blanket... night all...

122 cliffster  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:42:03pm

re: #115 Floral Giraffe

208 posts to go, for lucky number 8,000,000!
I wonder what the winner gets?
A toaster? A toster Oven, or, toasted?

If I stay up long enough to get 8mil, I'll be way too toasted to run a toaster oven. Probably not even a toaster.

123 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:42:15pm

re: #98 windsagio
Byproducts of all the brown acid.//

124 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:42:48pm

re: #111 zephirus

Remind Picard that the positronic antigravity velocerator will decrease the singularity to a class 9 where it will be navigable.

Whoa! Don't do that! You'll destabilize the warp core!
/Sheesh! Redshirts...!:)

125 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:43:17pm

re: #122 cliffster

But, you could stay up long enough to be toasted!
Even if I couldn't spell it correctly!
I guess an hour or so...

126 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:43:26pm

re: #90 publicityStunted

re: #113 tradewind

I always thought a 'flounce' was like saying "I never wanted to be here anyways", but the Urban Dictionary seems to agree with LGFs definition more than mine :)

127 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:43:56pm

re: #117 MandyManners
I can't read much S/F either.. must be a guy thing... but I really love watching a bunch of the newer stuff.

128 prairiefire  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:44:05pm

Carl Sagen is teh awesome. I'm going to read up on his theory that we carry ancestral "memory in our DNA. I think he is right.

129 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:44:08pm

re: #117 MandyManners

Good Night to you, Mandy!

130 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:44:21pm

The Taliban frowns upon science fiction.

And kites.

/

131 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:44:41pm

re: #98 windsagio

Product of the times tho', you have to accept a certain amount of that crap from the 60's and before, or you miss out on a LOT of good writing.

Tolkien women weren't exactly strong and outgoing hero's either...

It really is different, though. Tolkien is an earlier generation--MUCH less hostile toward women--and he's writing about an essentially medieval society.

132 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:44:56pm

re: #130 Gus 802

The Taliban frowns upon science fiction.

And kites.

/

I'm surprised they didn't try to ban sunshine.

133 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:45:07pm

re: #119 EmmmieG

He's modern too. The breakoff point (unsurprisingly) is about the early-mid '70s. Women were allowed to be powerful after that.

/well exaggerating some, but you get my drift.

134 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:45:08pm

re: #130 Gus 802

Why kites?
They fly? & it's a big old mystery?

135 Vambo  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:45:19pm

re: #92 MandyManners

I think it was Asimov who lead me to giving up sci-fi. IIRC, in his Foundation books, the women STILL were the ones doing all the cooking and cleaning.

bah, you can do better than Asimov...

136 Mad Al-Jaffee  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:45:43pm

re: #134 Floral Giraffe

Why kites?
They fly? & it's a big old mystery?

They hate Jews and can't spell very well.

137 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:46:02pm

re: #131 SanFranciscoZionist

I never read Asimov as hostile to women, or most of the other pulp authors I've read (eg EE Smith). Heinlein certainly had issues with women tho, to that I agree wholeheartedly!

138 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:46:19pm

re: #136 Mad Al-Jaffee

No, you didn't!
;)

139 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:46:27pm

re: #135 Vambo

I dunno, Caves of Steel is probably the best SF novel ever written.

140 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:46:39pm

re: #102 stevemcg

I didn't notice that. Now that you mention it, I can only think of one significant female character.

They had a big role later though:
Bicentennial Man

141 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:46:45pm

re: #126 windsagio

re: #113 tradewind

I always thought a 'flounce' was like saying "I never wanted to be here anyways", but the Urban Dictionary seems to agree with LGFs definition more than mine :)

It's a perfect word for an (alleged) member of an online community who feels the need to post a "Goodbye Cruel Blog" dramatic farewell.

"flounce' is a great term because it mocks them. Normal individuals just gradually stop posting or visiting sites in which they've lost interest. Flouncers are far from normal individuals.

142 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:47:08pm

re: #110 MandyManners

I feel as if I just put a turd into the punch bowl.

Gawd, no.

I still wish I'd never picked up "The Last Battle" as an adult. What Lewis does to Susan is unforgiveable.

143 prairiefire  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:47:16pm

Ray Bradbury's women in the Martian Chronicles were pretty equal to the men, if I remember correctly.

144 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:47:18pm

re: #111 zephirus

Remind Picard that the positronic antigravity velocerator will decrease the singularity to a class 9 where it will be navigable.

That won't work in this case. We're dealing with a Wingularity in this case. Those can never by navigated, and any who try are torn apart by the incredible forces of Bad Craziness within.

145 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:47:20pm

Now that I think about it, that flounce could have been caused by the PZ Myers hat tip, too.

146 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:47:34pm

re: #114 MandyManners

Back-lash?

Maybe. It's very pronounced in all the writing of the day.

147 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:47:37pm

re: #141 iceweasel

It's a perfect word for an (alleged) member of an online community who feels the need to post a "Goodbye Cruel Blog" dramatic farewell.

"flounce' is a great term because it mocks them. Normal individuals just gradually stop posting or visiting sites in which they've lost interest. Flouncers are far from normal individuals.

Yes, Flouncers are drama queens.

148 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:48:10pm

re: #142 SanFranciscoZionist

Gawd, no.

I still wish I'd never picked up "The Last Battle" as an adult. What Lewis does to Susan is unforgiveable.

Battlefield Earth. :/

149 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:48:26pm

re: #145 Charles

Now that I think about it, that flounce could have been caused by the PZ Myers hat tip, too.

More flounce to the ounce with LGF...

150 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:48:41pm

re: #145 Charles

I'm away from my worksite; did you receive my message?

151 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:49:10pm

re: #134 Floral Giraffe

Why kites?
They fly? & it's a big old mystery?

Popular secular entertainment in Afghanistan. Something they can take away.

152 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:49:31pm

re: #142 SanFranciscoZionist

God, I'd forgotten about that. That whole book was awful...

But Susan, I felt like she got thrown under the bus (train) just to show that, yes, people could go to hell.

153 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:49:57pm

re: #148 Varek Raith

Battlefield Earth. :/

Please don't bring up that sonorous brick of a book that was made into an ever worse movie.

154 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:49:58pm

Must go, husband is turning on movie.

155 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:50:12pm

By the way, I did a lengthy interview with the Los Angeles Times today -- looks like there may be profiles on little ol' me coming out in the Times's of both coasts soon.

156 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:50:15pm

re: #134 Floral Giraffe

Why kites?
They fly? & it's a big old mystery?

re: #134 Floral Giraffe

Why kites?
They fly? & it's a big old mystery?

There was a rule against kite flying which I remember hearing about in 2002.

In Herat, the Taliban Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice banned pork, kites and ''Beatle-ly'' hair.; THE CONTRABAND -- In their war against modernity, men from the ministry confiscated dozens of television sets and dumped them in their offices...

also

Under the Taliban regime, Sharia law was interpreted to ban a wide variety of activities hitherto lawful in Afghanistan: employment, education and sports for women, movies, television, videos, music, dancing, hanging pictures in homes, clapping during sports events, kite flying, and beard trimming. One Taliban list of prohibitions included:

pork, pig, pig oil, anything made from human hair, satellite dishes, cinematography, and equipment that produces the joy of music, pool tables, chess, masks, alcohol, tapes, computers, VCRs, television, anything that propagates sex and is full of music, wine, lobster, nail polish, firecrackers, statues, sewing catalogs, pictures, Christmas cards.

157 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:50:20pm

re: #141 iceweasel
JMO... always felt like flounces were begging for some one, any poster, to say ' Nooo, don't leave!'
Predictably, it almost never happens.

158 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:50:27pm

re: #152 windsagio

God, I'd forgotten about that. That whole book was awful...

But Susan, I felt like she got thrown under the bus (train) just to show that, yes, people could go to hell.

And what exactly is her sin? Oh yes. She becomes an adult woman.

The hussy.

159 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:50:38pm

re: #150 jaunte

I'm away from my worksite; did you receive my message?

Yes! I absolutely love it. You're a genius. Check your email.

160 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:51:22pm

re: #154 SanFranciscoZionist

Must go, husband is turning on movie.

You can't leave now!

Bye SFZ. ;)

161 zephirus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:51:35pm

re: #144 Dark_Falcon

Ah. Yes. The Wingularity. This is bad. Very bad. Only Satan can help us when the coefficient of Bad Craziness exceeds .99.

162 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:51:41pm

re: #158 SanFranciscoZionist

yeah, the bitch puts aside childhood!!


Clearly unacceptable.

163 Learned Mother of Zion  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:51:50pm

re: #155 Charles

By the way, I did a lengthy interview with the Los Angeles Times today -- looks like there may be profiles on little ol' me coming out in the Times's of both coasts soon.

That's way cool. When I come to LA in a few weeks, can I get your autograph? :)

164 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:51:55pm

re: #152 windsagio

God, I'd forgotten about that. That whole book was awful...

But Susan, I felt like she got thrown under the bus (train) just to show that, yes, people could go to hell.

I never read that book, but I was under the impression that she is not exactly sent to hell but simply did not experience the same rebirth as the others.

165 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:52:28pm

re: #134 Floral Giraffe

Why kites?
They fly? & it's a big old mystery?

Here's a great book on that very subject, it also was made into a movie:
[Link: www.amazon.com...]

166 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:53:09pm

re: #155 Charles
Do they let you peek, or do you just have to trust 'em?

167 Ojoe  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:53:21pm

Well I have never liked sci-fi much as literature (life is short) but I will except Ray Bradbury.

And he has a story about a preacher who wants to go to Mars and teach Martians about God, IIRC.

Good night all.

168 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:54:10pm

re: #164 Dark_Falcon

well she 'wasn't saved'. (oops spoiler, but its in like the first 5 pages)

I remember thinking hte one time I read it (and I was like 12, it pissed me off even then) that she was denied the salvation the rest of them got because she lost her faith. I think it was a comment on 'worldliness'.

169 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:54:23pm

re: #143 prairiefire

Ray Bradbury's women in the Martian Chronicles were pretty equal to the men, if I remember correctly.

That's probably one reason why as a child I could get into reading Bradbury a lot more than I could Heinlein.
I'd loved Tolkien, but when I reread it as an adult I couldn't help also feeling irritated by the female roles. (and general lack therof)
I mean, yeah, ok, you have Eowyn at the end, but she does it all for looove. And because she's longing for death in battle. Way to take away the glory, JRR. (even though I don't blame him too much.)

She doesn't even get her man, either.

170 Ojoe  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:55:26pm

re: #132 EmmmieG

The taliban was against chess because it was "a game of chance."

Amazing.

good night again.

171 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:56:03pm

re: #170 Ojoe
..And yet they get out of their beds every morning.///

172 Oh no...Sand People!  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:56:21pm
Consider ARTHUR CLARKE, author of many sci-fi works, including 2001: A Space Odyssey. Clarke, who was probably a homosexual, promoted evolutionary pantheism. He told a Sri Lankan newspaper, “I don’t believe in God or an afterlife” (“Life Beyond 2001: Exclusive Interview with Arthur C. Clarke,” The Island, Dec. 20, 2000). In the instructions he left for his funeral in March 2008 he said, “Absolutely no religious rites of any kind, relating to any religious faith, should be associated with my funeral.”

Chech this fantastic piece of 'journalism'...? Geesh...

173 Interesting Times  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:56:21pm

re: #94 Varek Raith

re: #113 tradewind

re: #126 windsagio

re: #141 iceweasel

Thanks for the info :) Strangely enough, in all the years I've used the Internet, LGF is the first site where I've seen the term in regular use. As an aside:

Definitions of flounce on the Web:

* frill: a strip of pleated material used as a decoration or a trim
* walk emphatically
* the act of walking with exaggerated jerky motions

That does conjure up some interesting mental pictures to go with posts of the same name...

174 Oh no...Sand People!  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:56:37pm

re: #172 Oh no...Sand People!

*Check

PIMF...

175 stevemcg  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:56:45pm

re: #108 Thanos

Fascinating. I had never heard him speak before. It looks like he made the whole statement off the top of his head. As an aside, writing fiction was not exactly his first career so maybe he was uncomfortable making viablr female characters.

176 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:56:59pm

re: #169 iceweasel

Eowyn was the one strong female in those books, and yeah she sold it all out for love and her proper place in the home.

Arwen was freakin' maddening.

Even Ursula LeGuin had serious issues with her presentation of women until the late 80s, when she had a change of heart.

177 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:57:12pm

re: #153 Dark_Falcon

Please don't bring up that sonorous brick of a book that was made into an ever worse movie.

Not a prob. ;) Though, it was the first Galactic Wide WMD humanity has created...
/:)

178 SaintGeorgeGentile  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:57:15pm
May I have another ibuprofen, please?

I think something stronger is called for.

179 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:57:27pm

re: #169 iceweasel

That's probably one reason why as a child I could get into reading Bradbury a lot more than I could Heinlein.
I'd loved Tolkien, but when I reread it as an adult I couldn't help also feeling irritated by the female roles. (and general lack therof)
I mean, yeah, ok, you have Eowyn at the end, but she does it all for looove. And because she's longing for death in battle. Way to take away the glory, JRR. (even though I don't blame him too much.)

She doesn't even get her man, either.

But she does get Faramir, who, as Steward of Gondor (though the office is once more subordinated to the King) would represent quite a catch.

180 cliffster  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:57:46pm

Time to turn in. I hope everyone has a great day tomorrow. Night all.

Hook 'em!

181 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:57:48pm

re: #111 zephirus

Remind Picard that the positronic antigravity velocerator will decrease the singularity to a class 9 where it will be navigable.

Picard is occupied at the moment. Apparently, someone decided the good captain needed some entertainment on the bridge.

:)

182 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:57:52pm

Do works of Christian-themed science fiction count? You know Left Behind, the Christ Clone trilogy, The Space Trilogy, the Wrinkle in Time series, The Matrix if you want to stretch it...

183 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:58:01pm

re: #173 publicityStunted
I believe they call it a ' storm-off ' in the theatrical world ( as in irritated diva stomping off the stage). That would fit as well.

184 Mich-again  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:58:04pm

Is this guy trying to get people to not go see Avatar? Good luck with that.

185 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:58:15pm

re: #165 Thanos

Here's a great book on that very subject, it also was made into a movie:
[Link: www.amazon.com...]

The Kite Runner (trailer)

186 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:58:22pm

re: #147 Thanos

It's the SWISH of them whisking their skirts, in a fury!

187 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:58:23pm

re: #179 Dark_Falcon

lol, reach for what you're allowed eh?

"I can't be a great warrior, but marrying one is almost as good! Plus he's handsome and rich!"

188 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:58:58pm

re: #168 windsagio

well she 'wasn't saved'. (oops spoiler, but its in like the first 5 pages)

I remember thinking hte one time I read it (and I was like 12, it pissed me off even then) that she was denied the salvation the rest of them got because she lost her faith. I think it was a comment on 'worldliness'.

It doesn't bother me as much. It's Lewis' way of pointing out how easy it is to fall off of the right path.

189 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:59:16pm

re: #157 tradewind

JMO... always felt like flounces were begging for some one, any poster, to say ' Nooo, don't leave!'
Predictably, it almost never happens.

Maybe that's why so many of them hate it here so much they have to keep saying goodbye and 'fuck you' over and over.

How can we miss you if you won't go away???/

There's no doubt in my mind that the previously 'inactive' posters who feel a burning need to impart their swan cuckoo song to us are sockpuppets.
(and here I refer to the cuckoo's practice of leaving its eggs in many other nests to hatch, albeit the 'crazy' connotation of cuckoo also fits.)
I propose referring to such flounces as cuckoos.

190 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 8:59:27pm

re: #169 iceweasel

That's probably one reason why as a child I could get into reading Bradbury a lot more than I could Heinlein.
I'd loved Tolkien, but when I reread it as an adult I couldn't help also feeling irritated by the female roles. (and general lack therof)
I mean, yeah, ok, you have Eowyn at the end, but she does it all for looove. And because she's longing for death in battle. Way to take away the glory, JRR. (even though I don't blame him too much.)

She doesn't even get her man, either.

LOTR is not about gurlz...even so some of the most powerful characters in that story are women...Galadrial is a direct decendent of the High Elves...she's the most powerful personage in all of Middle Earth

191 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:00:10pm

re: #187 windsagio

lol, reach for what you're allowed eh?

"I can't be a great warrior, but marrying one is almost as good! Plus he's handsome and rich!"

But she did kill the whatever-it-was. (Saw the movie, didn't read the book.)

At least she didn't have to fight in a metal brassiere. (Check the covers of your 70's era cheaper sci-fi paperbacks.)

192 Oh no...Sand People!  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:00:45pm

re: #182 fenrisdesigns

Do works of Christian-themed science fiction count? You know Left Behind, the Christ Clone trilogy, The Space Trilogy, the Wrinkle in Time series, The Matrix if you want to stretch it...

As well as the late to be release "The Pure" trilogy...

/shameless plug

193 zephirus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:00:45pm

re: #155 Charles

Your declaration about your reasons for parting with the far right have certainly gotten a lot of attention and evidently resonated with a lot of conservatives. Now if only more sane religious voices would speak up against the religious loonies.

194 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:00:58pm

re: #187 windsagio

lol, reach for what you're allowed eh?

"I can't be a great warrior, but marrying one is almost as good! Plus he's handsome and rich!"

Well, as the sister to the King of Rohan and the slayer of the Lord of the Nazgul, she'd be just as much a catch. It also serves to bind Rohan and The Reunited Kingdom together.

195 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:01:38pm

re: #190 albusteve

LOTR is not about gurlz...even so some of the most powerful characters in that story are women...Galadrial is a direct decendent of the High Elves...she's the most powerful personage in all of Middle Earth

Quite right. Tolkien does get points for that.

196 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:02:24pm

re: #190 albusteve

but she can still do NOTHING. She's almost as bad as Arwen. All that power, and all she can do is sit at home giving unclear advice.


re: #188 Dark_Falcon

Heh, I admit I haven't looked at it for about 20 years. Maybe my judgement would be different now... Its just how cavalier he was about throwing her aside.

re: #194 Dark_Falcon

Oh yeah. Don't get me wrong, she's the female char I like in the books. And looking back at the sexism doesn't bug me that much (different era, etc). Its just... so blatant ;)

197 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:02:39pm

re: #155 Charles

Profiles and articles are good.
IF you're staying private on the safety issues.
I'm glad to see you getting some attention for your rational point of view!

198 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:03:06pm

re: #194 Dark_Falcon

Well, as the sister to the King of Rohan and the slayer of the Lord of the Nazgul, she'd be just as much a catch. It also serves to bind Rohan and The Reunited Kingdom together.

It really is a medieval political story.

199 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:03:07pm

Female characters in fiction are always difficult. Vonnegut and Chuck Palahniuk (fight club, etc) are great examples. The female characters are important and often drive the story but they are two dimensional. I think the problem is that male authors have difficulty presenting fully formed female characters and to do so would be presumptuous and probably not realistic or interesting. Female authors can do this but male readers can't tolerate the Oprah book of the month selections anyways.
Carl Sagan's lead character in Contact (played by Jodie Foster in the movie) is a rare example of a female character in sci-fi that actually works.

200 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:03:10pm

re: #194 Dark_Falcon

Well, as the sister to the King of Rohan and the slayer of the Lord of the Nazgul, she'd be just as much a catch. It also serves to bind Rohan and The Reunited Kingdom together.

she was the daughter of the king...ya boob

201 prairiefire  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:03:28pm

Oh my goodness, discussing LOTR could easily get to the 8 million mark. Night, Lizards.

202 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:03:46pm

re: #190 albusteve

LOTR is not about gurlz...even so some of the most powerful characters in that story are women...Galadrial is a direct decendent of the High Elves...she's the most powerful personage in all of Middle Earth

I'd actually say that Sauron is the most powerful. Other than that your point stands.

203 That's Glenn Beck to you  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:03:47pm

You don't think that Science Fiction is harmful?

Look what it did to this guy!

204 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:04:07pm

re: #199 Killgore Trout

Female characters in fiction are always difficult. Vonnegut and Chuck Palahniuk (fight club, etc) are great examples. The female characters are important and often drive the story but they are two dimensional. I think the problem is that male authors have difficulty presenting fully formed female characters and to do so would be presumptuous and probably not realistic or interesting. Female authors can do this but male readers can't tolerate the Oprah book of the month selections anyways.
Carl Sagan's lead character in Contact (played by Jodie Foster in the movie) is a rare example of a female character in sci-fi that actually works.

Fiction or science fiction? I assure you, Jane Austen got her women right on the mark.

205 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:04:22pm

re: #184 Mich-again

Is this guy trying to get people to not go see Avatar? Good luck with that.

One billion a the box office. Too late.

206 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:04:22pm

re: #203 That's Glenn Beck to you

What happened to the bottom of his beard?

207 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:04:35pm

re: #200 albusteve

she was the daughter of the king...ya boob

Oops. Thank you for the correction.

208 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:04:53pm

re: #196 windsagio

but she can still do NOTHING. She's almost as bad as Arwen. All that power, and all she can do is sit at home giving unclear advice.

re: #188 Dark_Falcon

Heh, I admit I haven't looked at it for about 20 years. Maybe my judgement would be different now... Its just how cavalier he was about throwing her aside.

re: #194 Dark_Falcon

Oh yeah. Don't get me wrong, she's the female char I like in the books. And looking back at the sexism doesn't bug me that much (different era, etc). Its just... so blatant ;)

huh?...Frodo would not have endured his journey without Galadrials help...did you ever read the books?

209 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:05:10pm

re: #203 That's Glenn Beck to you

You don't think that Science Fiction is harmful?

Look what it did to this guy!

"I can't keep my sideburns combed down anymore! Thanks, scifi!"

210 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:05:26pm

re: #179 Dark_Falcon

But she does get Faramir, who, as Steward of Gondor (though the office is once more subordinated to the King) would represent quite a catch.

Yes, but in the books at least, it seemed to me that there was definitely the implication that she was 'settling' for him. Tolkien gives her a happy enough ending, but as a female reading those books, it doesn't sit entirely well.
Mostly I was always pissed off that she didn't go into battle saying "to hell with this heartbreak stuff, there's a world to save and I'm going to do it."
She goes in expecting to be killed and because she doesn't care anymore and I hated that.

211 prairiefire  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:05:29pm

re: #199 Killgore Trout

"Aliens" by James Cameron? OK , BBT

212 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:06:30pm

re: #206 jaunte
Maybe she sat in something?

213 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:06:46pm

If it weren't for sci-fi, and reaaalllyyy strong weed, we wouldn't have gems like this;

214 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:06:46pm

re: #202 Dark_Falcon

I'd actually say that Sauron is the most powerful. Other than that your point stands.

well they kicked his ass no?...my point is Galadrial is a High Elf...Sauron was in fear of her...she had some bigtime mojo

215 Oh no...Sand People!  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:06:49pm

re: #211 prairiefire

"Aliens" by James Cameron? OK , BBT

That movie ruled.

216 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:06:55pm

re: #208 albusteve

too many times probably, they were a big part of my childhood.

I'll admit I'm actually being unfair. The reason she was so worthless wasn't really because of gender, but rather because Tolkien had this whole theme about how the Elves time was over, and it was up to men to fix the problem that the elves had made. It still drives me crazy tho'.

217 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:06:55pm

re: #204 EmmmieG

Fiction or science fiction? I assure you, Jane Austen got her women right on the mark.


Fiction in general. I could never sit down and read a Jane Austen novel. I'd kill myself instead. Same goes for that douchebag who wrote Wuthering Heights. They might be good female characters but I'll be damned if a heterosexual male could endure them.

218 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:06:57pm

re: #198 jaunte

It really is a medieval political story.

True. The battles in the War of the Ring are of medieval size as well. 10,00 soldiers seems a vast number in LotR. By way of contrast, Gettysburg saw over 150,000 men engaged.

219 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:07:04pm

re: #199 Killgore Trout

I think there is a big difference in the way men view women and the way that women view men. Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, springs to mind. I don't know why men can't visualize or write about women in the same way that they can men. Yet, women can write about men with the same depth that they write about women. Is it a cultural prejudice? It's totally weirod.

220 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:07:39pm

re: #217 Killgore Trout

Fiction in general. I could never sit down and read a Jane Austen novel. I'd kill myself instead. Same goes for that douchebag who wrote Wuthering Heights. They might be good female characters but I'll be damned if a heterosexual male could endure them.

I see you've been talking to my husband. And my brothers. And my father. And my sons. And my nephews...

221 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:08:07pm

re: #211 prairiefire

Ah, yes. Ripley from the Alien movies is another good example of a decent female character in sci-fi. Nice catch.

222 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:08:12pm

Anyone here enjoy Avatar?

/because if you did Jesus hates you.

223 wee fury  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:08:44pm

hum -- seems almost like science fiction:

Deputies nabbed a suspect, apparently caught red-handed with a brush and paint can–applying a new color to disguise the stolen fish house. The small building, valued at $10,000, was reported stolen some time on Dec. 27 from the north side of Big Pine Lake, northeast of Perham.

Then again, this happened in Minnesota.

224 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:09:10pm

re: #222 EastSider

Nature good, technoloy bad. Yep, got it down pat.

225 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:09:28pm

re: #216 windsagio

too many times probably, they were a big part of my childhood.

I'll admit I'm actually being unfair. The reason she was so worthless wasn't really because of gender, but rather because Tolkien had this whole theme about how the Elves time was over, and it was up to men to fix the problem that the elves had made. It still drives me crazy tho'.

too bad you read too much into it...you might read the Sil and get some perspective...it's not a soap opera, it's a history

226 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:09:33pm

85 on the countdown clock...
TIC TIC TIC...


Toc!

227 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:09:43pm

re: #200 albusteve

No, she was the niece of one king and the sister of another who ends up marrying a Prince of Gondor.

228 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:10:05pm

re: #224 fenrisdesigns

*technology

229 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:10:25pm

re: #224 fenrisdesigns

Nature good, technoloy bad. Yep, got it down pat.

That's why I'm not going to see it. I don't need to spend money to be lectured by a liberal. When I want that, I'll have iceweasel lecture me for free. ;)

230 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:11:20pm

re: #217 Killgore Trout
OMG...
Heathcliff... pretty freaking awesome male character.

231 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:11:28pm

re: #221 Killgore Trout

Yeah. The other chick in Alien tho...

The commentary with her is funny, she hates her own character.

232 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:12:24pm

re: #227 Lidane

No, she was the niece of one king and the sister of another who ends up marrying a Prince of Gondor.

my bad, you are correct

233 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:12:39pm

re: #219 Floral Giraffe

I think there is a big difference in the way men view women and the way that women view men. Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, springs to mind. I don't know why men can't visualize or write about women in the same way that they can men. Yet, women can write about men with the same depth that they write about women. Is it a cultural prejudice? It's totally weirod.

It's an odd phenomenon, I wish I had a decent explanation why. It has something to do with the way men see the world.

234 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:12:40pm

re: #227 Lidane

No, she was the niece of one king and the sister of another who ends up marrying a Prince of Gondor.

One of my bigger problems w/ LOTR was with the end battle in Return of the King, where the Dark Flying bad guy says something like

"You fool! No man can kill me!"

Before your aforementioned heroine stabs him in the face.

Even if you ignore the obvious male/female loophole, this dark Lord was so stupid as to think he was invincible because "no man can kill him" in a world inhabited by dwarves, elves, and walking trees? Legolas coulda sniped him from 2,000 yards.

235 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:13:01pm

re: #225 albusteve

I know all about it. Me not liking some storytelling and philosophical points in LOTR doesn't mean I'm a bad person, nor does it mean that I just don't get it :)

I'd argue that my problem is that I get it too well, and it interferes a little bit with my enjoyment of the books.

236 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:13:18pm

I don't know about sci-fi, although CJ Cherryh's women aren't wimps, but in fantasy:

Polgara from the David Eddings series will stare you into submission...

Nanny Ogg and Granny Weatherwax (Terry Pratchett) can use their headology on you...

And Thursday Next...don't mess with a chronoguard agent...

237 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:13:57pm

re: #236 EmmmieG

I was just going to post this
[Link: www.amazon.com...]

238 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:14:00pm

re: #219 Floral Giraffe

Yet, women can write about men with the same depth that they write about women. Is it a cultural prejudice? It's totally weird.

Perhaps it is a cultural prejudice that you think they can?

239 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:14:12pm

re: #236 EmmmieG

those are all after the paradigm shift re: sexism tho'. I'm still trying to think of some actually strong women from before the '70s.

240 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:14:16pm

re: #234 EastSider

One of my bigger problems w/ LOTR was with the end battle in Return of the King, where the Dark Flying bad guy says something like

"You fool! No man can kill me!"

Before your aforementioned heroine stabs him in the face.

Even if you ignore the obvious male/female loophole, this dark Lord was so stupid as to think he was invincible because "no man can kill him" in a world inhabited by dwarves, elves, and walking trees? Legolas coulda sniped him from 2,000 yards.

that's not what happened...nice try

241 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:15:02pm

re: #240 albusteve

that's not what happened...nice try

what'd I fudge up? Its been a while for the movie, and longer for the books.

242 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:15:17pm

Hey Night Lizards!

Well Science Fiction is that bad, I'm going to hell. Did I share with you Audio Science Fiction Magazines: StarShipSofa and EscapePod?

They are weekly FREE podcasts and I have been enjoying them immensely.

I find that Science Fiction is helping me adjust to this Brave New World we are in.

How are you-all?

243 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:15:17pm

Samuel Delaney has strong and very strikingly unique female characters in his books and stories.

244 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:15:51pm

re: #241 EastSider

I thought it was a pretty good summary. And the 'racial' loophole totally works too, because in the book it makes a point that a hafling can mess him up too.

245 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:15:56pm

re: #239 windsagio

Lady MacBeth?

/Kidding. How about Beatrice from Much Ado About Nothing?

246 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:15:59pm

re: #235 windsagio

I know all about it. Me not liking some storytelling and philosophical points in LOTR doesn't mean I'm a bad person, nor does it mean that I just don't get it :)

I'd argue that my problem is that I get it too well, and it interferes a little bit with my enjoyment of the books.

it's a story...you don't need to get out in front of the author...it's not an intellectual exercise

247 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:16pm

If any women want to understand how men see the world I suggest watching Unforgiven and pay close attention to the female characters. They're all there and they're very important to the story. They're sympathetic and powerful characters. They have a lot of influence yet lack depth. Maybe manhood is a form of Autism or Asperger's.

248 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:20pm

re: #233 Killgore Trout

Yes, I am going to do this!
(It's the ooga chaga, that made me!)
BAD 70's warning!

249 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:26pm

These people probably also hate Harry Potter. Not sure why, since Harry's act of sacrifice clearly resembles that of Christ's, but maybe it's the underlying message against fascism they have a problem with in those books.

250 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:37pm

re: #245 EmmmieG

oh man, I'd love to see some scifi Shakespeare. If done right it would be awesome!


Tricky project to say the least tho'.

251 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:47pm

re: #247 Killgore Trout

Not. Touching. This. One.

252 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:50pm

I've actually been going balls-crazy with astrophysics equations lately. A friend's furry scifi story inspired me, and now I'm stuck with some 30 pages of notes on hypothetical space-faring scenarios.

253 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:52pm

re: #229 Dark_Falcon

That's why I'm not going to see it. I don't need to spend money to be lectured by a liberal. When I want that, I'll have iceweasel lecture me for free. ;)

Hee! Believe it or not, quite a few on the left have problems with that movie.
Me, I don't go to the movies for political analysis (unless it's a documentary). Just entertain me, dammit!

254 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:16:52pm

re: #239 windsagio

those are all after the paradigm shift re: sexism tho'. I'm still trying to think of some actually strong women from before the '70s.

Lillian Gish in "The Night of the Hunter".

255 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:17:17pm

re: #241 EastSider

what'd I fudge up? Its been a while for the movie, and longer for the books.

read it again sometime

256 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:17:19pm

re: #249 Sharmuta

These people probably also hate Harry Potter. Not sure why, since Harry's act of sacrifice clearly resembles that of Christ's, but maybe it's the underlying message against fascism they have a problem with in those books.

I think it's much simpler than that. Magic.
:)

257 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:17:19pm

re: #254 ryannon

haven't read that one, googling!

258 zephirus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:17:28pm

re: #239 windsagio

Katherine Hepburn?

259 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:17:48pm

re: #239 windsagio

Dale Evans?
Katharine Hepburn?
Queen Mum?
Mrs. Roosevelt?

260 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:17:57pm

re: #243 Thanos

Samuel Delaney has strong and very strikingly unique female characters in his books and stories.

I am never going to get caught up on my "lizard reading list"!!!

261 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:17:57pm

re: #249 Sharmuta

re: #256 Varek Raith

He hit it on the head. It encourages kids to experiment with Sorcery!

262 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:18:10pm

re: #256 Varek Raith

I think it's much simpler than that. Magic.
:)

There's no Jesus, even though they celebrate Christmas and Easter- clearly they're pagans.

263 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:18:19pm

re: #229 Dark_Falcon
I'd be gnashing my teeth watching anything zipping through a warm jungle while Dixie is gripped in the teeth of a Siberian freeze. I can't remember this long a ridiculously cold 'snap', and there's no infrastructure to handle it. We don't do snowplows down here!

264 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:18:26pm

re: #259 ggt

oops, missed some context.

Add "In science fiction or fantasy stories"

265 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:18:39pm

re: #247 Killgore Trout

If any women want to understand how men see the world I suggest watching Unforgiven and pay close attention to the female characters. They're all there and they're very important to the story. They're sympathetic and powerful characters. They have a lot of influence yet lack depth. Maybe manhood is a form of Autism or Asperger's.

It might have been contra-survival to ponder too much when outside the cave.

266 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:18:50pm

re: #264 windsagio

Yeah, or I'll add "My grandmothers."

267 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:05pm

Don't even get me started on the things Gollum encourages kids to start messing around with...

268 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:06pm

re: #239 windsagio

those are all after the paradigm shift re: sexism tho'. I'm still trying to think of some actually strong women from before the '70s.

I think part of the issue may be the fact that we're looking at literature through a 2010 lens. Gender roles have equalized radically in the last 50 years. What was considered a "strong" woman in 1700 (or 1800, 1900, 1950 or even 1960-1970) might not be viewed as strong today, simply due to limitations of her available roles.

You could make the argument that someone like Mercedes in Count of Monte Cristo was "strong." She maintains faith and devotion in the face of an apparently deceased husband.

Similarly Lady MacBeth was pretty strong willed...though her strength didn't exactly pan out well in the end for anyone.

269 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:07pm

re: #247 Killgore Trout

If any women want to understand how men see the world I suggest watching Unforgiven and pay close attention to the female characters. They're all there and they're very important to the story. They're sympathetic and powerful characters. They have a lot of influence yet lack depth. Maybe manhood is a form of Autism or Asperger's.

Well, autism and Aspergers do occur much more often in males than in females. Just sayin...

270 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:13pm

re: #249 Sharmuta

These people probably also hate Harry Potter. Not sure why, since Harry's act of sacrifice clearly resembles that of Christ's, but maybe it's the underlying message against fascism they have a problem with in those books.

I noticed that too, three years ago.

271 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:18pm

re: #257 windsagio

haven't read watched that one, googling!

272 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:40pm

re: #254 ryannon

Lillian Gish in "The Night of the Hunter".

Bette Davis in Watch on the Rhine

273 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:48pm

re: #249 Sharmuta

These people probably also hate Harry Potter. Not sure why, since Harry's act of sacrifice clearly resembles that of Christ's, but maybe it's the underlying message against fascism they have a problem with in those books.

One of my saddest encounters with fundamentalism was with a young boy who had downs syndrome. He's not very bright but a nice kid, and he would love Harry Potter. I just assumed that he was going to see the new movie and asked him about it when his dad brought him in for kids at work day, and he blurted out "My dad says Harry Potter's bad!"... I've never seen him with a pained face except for at that moment.

274 zephirus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:19:53pm

re: #256 Varek Raith

But, but, but...they believe in the devil. That's religious magicalism.

275 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:20:00pm

re: #265 jaunte

It might have been contra-survival to ponder too much when outside the cave.

I think it's all about the boobs.

276 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:20:27pm

re: #268 EastSider

thats my whole point!

..and the reason why the old sexism doesn't bother me.

That being said, by todays standards theres juts not much.

277 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:20:44pm

re: #249 Sharmuta

Oh, they definitely hate the Potter books despite the obvious Christian overtones in Book 7, and the constant themes of sacrifice and love all through the series. Harry Potter's a wizard, after all, and magic is a tool of Satan that will corrupt weak and innocent minds and lead them from God. Or something.

I never quite understood it all, since it all goes back to my contention that if your faith is threatened by books about wizards or some other fantasty/sci-fi thing, then you're not much of a believer in the first place.

278 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:20:44pm

re: #276 windsagio

edit to read *Doesn't bother me very much

279 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:20:54pm

re: #272 ggt

Bette Davis in Watch on the Rhine

Marlene Dietrich in "The Blue Angel"

280 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:21:01pm

re: #275 Sharmuta

Default settings.

281 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:21:04pm

re: #268 EastSider

Not to mention, today, we have the choice of having or not having 12 children...It's a physical strength IMHO.

282 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:21:17pm

re: #270 fenrisdesigns

In fact, now that I read all the books by now, I should complete that page.

283 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:21:27pm

re: #262 Sharmuta

There's no Jesus, even though they celebrate Christmas and Easter- clearly they're pagans.

It's the divination without reference to "doing God's will". These people object to anything that doesn't constantly reference their version of the one true G-d.

A lot in common with some Muslims who have to praise Allah every five words . . .

284 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:21:29pm

re: #260 Floral Giraffe

I am never going to get caught up on my "lizard reading list"!!!

[Link: www.amazon.com...]

These are both short and will turn your mind into a pretzel, but you will enjoy it.

285 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:22:06pm

re: #280 jaunte

Default settings.

No, that's not default settings. That's hard-wiring. (Yes, I can see the puns I am inadvertently setting up.) Default settings can be changed.

286 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:22:09pm

re: #268 EastSider

I think part of the issue may be the fact that we're looking at literature through a 2010 lens.

To make a reference to a post I made in the previous thread, the word is Presentism.

287 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:22:29pm

re: #268 EastSider

Exactly. 'Female strength' is relative -- relative to the ways in which the prevailing gender role of the times permits them to express that strength. Consequently authors portray what would be a strong female character, insofar as that is understood by them.

288 Kragar  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:22:41pm

What a load of utter and complete HORSESHIT!

289 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:22:41pm

re: #277 Lidane

Oh, they definitely hate the Potter books despite the obvious Christian overtones in Book 7, and the constant themes of sacrifice and love all through the series. Harry Potter's a wizard, after all, and magic is a tool of Satan that will corrupt weak and innocent minds and lead them from God. Or something.

I never quite understood it all, since it all goes back to my contention that if your faith is threatened by books about wizards or some other fantasty/sci-fi thing, then you're not much of a believer in the first place.

Oh, for sure! Same with science in general- if your faith is so weak that Darwin threatens your soul then you're really missing the larger picture of Christianity.

290 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:23:19pm

re: #288 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

What a load of utter and complete HORSESHIT!

I agree

291 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:23:35pm

re: #286 Naso Tang

and what a word it is!

Of course, one can make a strong argument that the present viewpoint is better than the older ones, making presentism a somewhat appropriate filter for analysis.

292 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:23:47pm

re: #281 Floral Giraffe

Not to mention, today, we have the choice of having or not having 12 children...It's a physical strength IMHO.

Speaking of, the mom in Cheaper by the Dozen (the original book, not the awful Steve Martin movie) was fairly strong. Held the family together in the end. That was 1950s?

293 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:24:32pm

Look out. Eight million is approaching.

294 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:24:50pm

re: #270 fenrisdesigns
Funniest parody ever: Tracy Ullman making fun of JK Rowling 's flying all over the world suing everyone for copyright infringements re Harry Potter.
Pretty sure that I enjoyed reading the HP books more than my children did.

295 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:24:50pm

re: #264 windsagio

oops, missed some context.

Add "In science fiction or fantasy stories"

I've actually learned a lot from Amy H. Sturgis's articles on the StarShipSofa. She did an episode on Feminist Science Fiction --Can't remember much, I did write down some of the books for future reading. I think it was Aural Delights #41.

296 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:25:00pm

re: #293 Charles

Look out. Eight million is approaching.

Is this like the Hadron collider? We're not entirely sure if reality will survive?

297 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:25:23pm

re: #292 EastSider

The original book was turn of the last century, I believe.

298 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:25:29pm

re: #293 Charles

Look out. Eight million is approaching.

Crap. How long do I have to stay up tonight?

299 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:25:29pm

re: #296 EmmmieG

Yes. LOL!

300 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:25:41pm

re: #293 Charles

Look out. Eight million is approaching.

got my Cowboy hat on and my Lizard armor...I'm ready

301 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:25:53pm

re: #294 tradewind

link?

302 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:10pm

re: #293 Charles

Man, Steve should come back. I could easily get us there in 30 minutes by arguing about Lord of the Rings with him!

303 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:21pm

re: #298 Naso Tang

Crap. How long do I have to stay up tonight?

you are dismissed from the festivities

304 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:22pm

Whoa, here it comes now...

305 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:22pm

Beatbox Choir- not to be missed

306 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:23pm

Reminds me of another science fiction/religion short story:
The Nine Billion Names of God
[Link: lucis.net...]

307 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:24pm

re: #279 ryannon

Marlene Dietrich in "The Blue Angel"

Yes, but that's the epitome of 'female strength' seen as a terrifying and destructive force.
It's no coincidence that that emphasizes sexuality, either. You can still find that 'blue angel' archetype of 'female as destroyer' motivating all sorts of works.

Great movie examples btw!

308 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:26pm

re: #298 Naso Tang

Couple of minutes, once the Lizards mobilize!
It's under 25 posts, if I'm counting correctly.
Only Charles knows for sure!

309 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:27pm

re: #292 EastSider

Speaking of, the mom in Cheaper by the Dozen (the original book, not the awful Steve Martin movie) was fairly strong. Held the family together in the end. That was 1950s?

But that wasn't a fictional mother. That was a real mother, not someone's 19th century idealization of womanhood.

310 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:28pm

re: #265 jaunte

It might have been contra-survival to ponder too much when outside the cave.

Don't even get me started on why modern men cower in their own homes in "man caves".

311 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:28pm

re: #293 Charles

Look out. Eight million is approaching.

This is like waiting for a total solar eclipse. Do we have to wear special glasses for this?

312 Gus  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:32pm

8,000,000 comments!

313 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:35pm

re: #304 Charles

Whoa, here it comes now...

Really?

314 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:36pm

Doing it for Houston

315 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:41pm

Not long it seems

316 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:50pm

re: #300 albusteve

Are you riding off into the sunset?

317 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:53pm

Bitchin'

318 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:26:56pm

re: #310 Killgore Trout

Man caves need lathes!

319 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:01pm

Think it already happened...

320 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:15pm

Ready for it.

321 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:16pm

Here comes the real trivia.

322 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:19pm

re: #301 fenrisdesigns
It was a segment on her comedy series last year... I'll see if I can find it for you.

323 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:21pm

lol he wasn't kidding about it being close >

324 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:33pm

re: #310 Killgore Trout

Don't even get me started on why modern men cower in their own homes in "man caves".

Every man cave I've ever created got invaded by my wife, and I wouldn't have it any other way.

325 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:34pm

I'm the 'Eight Million Post Man'...eat my dust

326 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:37pm

re: #298 Naso Tang

Crap. How long do I have to stay up tonight?

Not long. With feminism, scifi, harry potter, and carl sagan all active topics, we could hit 9 million before much longer!

327 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:38pm

re: #293 Charles

Look out. Eight million is approaching.

Years since the last Jets Superbowl?
Votes stolen by Acorn in the last election?
Pipers piping?

oh right...commenters commenting. Be careful Charles, this LGF thing may go somewhere someday. You may be able to give up your for-profit photography operations.

328 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:40pm

I'm going to shut up now just in case of of my stupid comments makes the target.

329 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:43pm

re: #307 iceweasel

makes me think of the phrase/concept Vagina Dentata

330 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:52pm

Back 14 according to my calculations

331 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:53pm

re: #310 Killgore Trout

Please define "man cave"?

332 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:27:59pm

When 4chan celebrated their 100 millionth post, a furry ended up stealing it from them.

333 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:05pm

re: #328 Killgore Trout

I'm going to shut up now just in case of of my stupid comments makes the target.

Oh god I hope that one was it. Typos enshrined forever.

334 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:08pm

re: #331 Floral Giraffe

Please define "man cave"?

garage.

335 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:16pm

re: #324 Thanos

ooh, read that again with a really dirty mind >>

336 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:21pm

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

337 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:24pm

re: #277 Lidane

Oh, they definitely hate the Potter books despite the obvious Christian overtones in Book 7, and the constant themes of sacrifice and love all through the series. Harry Potter's a wizard, after all, and magic is a tool of Satan that will corrupt weak and innocent minds and lead them from God. Or something.

I never quite understood it all, since it all goes back to my contention that if your faith is threatened by books about wizards or some other fantasty/sci-fi thing, then you're not much of a believer in the first place.

It was the same with The Dan Brown Davinci Code. I asked a very devout (but living in the here and now) Christian I know if the book challenged her faith. She said "No--but it was a really good novel".

The concept that human beings cannot distinguish between the real and the imagined is a bit insulting on the part of the fundamentalists who think they know it all.

338 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:32pm

re: #328 Killgore Trout

I'm going to shut up now just in case of of my stupid comments makes the target.

So... are we supposed to say something...deep or meaningful?

339 Killgore Trout  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:38pm

re: #333 Obdicut

Ha!

340 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:45pm

re: #328 Killgore Trout

I'm going to shut up now just in case of of my stupid comments makes the target.

Check out the beatboxing.

341 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:47pm

re: #328 Killgore Trout

I do SO hope that hit the number!

342 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:48pm

re: #336 Charles

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

CHEATER!

343 Olsonist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:54pm

re: #336 Charles

I smell something very fishy.

344 djughurknot  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:28:54pm

Dang! I miss all the good threads.

345 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:00pm

re: #336 Charles

Well congrats!

346 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:04pm

re: #336 Charles

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

Do you win a calendar?

347 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:05pm

re: #336 Charles

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

I had an intuition it would be - really.

348 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:05pm

re: #336 Charles

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

do deleted comments count?

349 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:06pm

re: #336 Charles

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

If you admit to being furry, I'm posting a screen on 4chan.

350 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:08pm

I didn't mean to do that! Sorry to hog the glory.

351 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:22pm

re: #336 Charles

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

I demands a recount!11!!
/

352 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:23pm

re: #336 Charles

Thats pretty brilliant >>

353 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:26pm

re: #336 Charles

I don't believe it.

Looks like the person who posted comment #8,000,000 was ... me.

Recount!

354 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:33pm

re: #336 Charles

Curses!
Which one was it?

355 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:35pm

re: #329 windsagio

makes me think of the phrase/concept Vagina Dentata

Ohhh, you HAVE to see the film 'Teeth'.
NOT for everyone, but excellent, funny, and spot-on movie. From what I've seen of you I think you'd love it.

356 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:36pm

re: #289 Sharmuta

Oh, for sure! Same with science in general- if your faith is so weak that Darwin threatens your soul then you're really missing the larger picture of Christianity.

I think the point is that Darwin threatens the bank accounts of certain Preachers.

357 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:38pm

The House wins again!

358 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:49pm

re: #353 Naso Tang

Recount!

You recount. Start at one and let us know how it goes.

359 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:50pm

I'm double-checking right now...

360 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:29:59pm

re: #351 Varek Raith
re: #353 Naso Tang


By Hand!

361 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:14pm

re: #350 Charles

I didn't mean to do that! Sorry to hog the glory.

you deserve it...but then so did I...I want an investigation!

362 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:21pm

I'm glad that's over.

363 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:25pm

re: #355 iceweasel

I have seen it! One of my friends is a huge Trash horror fan!

also...

NOT for everyone, but excellent, funny, and spot-on movie. From what I've seen of you I think you'd love it.

uh oh... altho I admit I did enjoy it ;)

364 Pip's Squeak  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:27pm

re: #233 Killgore Trout

Balzac?, Dickens? Fontane?

365 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:37pm

re: #362 ryannon

I'm glad that's over.

The suspense was killing me.

366 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:39pm

re: #346 Sharmuta

I just spit wine, all over the place!
;)

367 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:51pm

re: #360 EastSider

re: #353 Naso Tang

By Hand!

There's chads on some of those comments...

368 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:30:59pm

Be thankful it wasn't a flounce.

369 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:31:02pm

Yep.

It was this one, all right:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

370 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:31:03pm

re: #361 albusteve

you deserve it...but then so did I...I want an investigation!

Recount! Hanging chad! Wake the Supreme Court from their daily nap and get them in here!

371 Olsonist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:31:14pm

re: #366 Floral Giraffe

An alcoholic spit take! Nice.

372 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:31:15pm

re: #365 Sharmuta

The suspense was killing me.

the 5m gig was too much really...

373 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:31:35pm

re: #368 Naso Tang

I dunno, that'd have been great too >>

374 djughurknot  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:31:45pm

Was there a pool for who would get number 8 million? And whether it would have been a flounce?

375 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:31:51pm

re: #369 Charles

Yep.

It was this one, all right:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

You beat me by zero seconds. Congratulations.

376 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:32:11pm

re: #319 Varek Raith

Think it already happened...

Aha! I was right!
/its rigged, I tells ya!
//:P

377 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:32:15pm

re: #369 Charles

Yep.

It was this one, all right:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

almost orgasmic...here it comes!

378 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:32:25pm

I tried, Shlomo...

379 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:32:34pm

it would be interesting to see by the way, how the post count is accellerating (presuming it is), and how much faster 8m-10m will be than 5m-8m was.

380 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:32:50pm

re: #369 Charles

Yep.

It was this one, all right:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

You do have a way of restating a point unnecessarily sometimes.

381 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:33:16pm

re: #380 Naso Tang

You do have a way of restating a point unnecessarily sometimes.

I say it's a beautiful slogan for the chaos of our times.

382 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:33:35pm

Right now, we look kinda like this:

383 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:33:57pm

re: #382 fenrisdesigns

Right now, we look kinda like this:


[Video]

I so loved that movie.

384 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:34:03pm

re: #369 Charles

Yep.

It was this one, all right:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

"You tell rolling stone...that my last words were..."I'm on Drugs!""

/Almost Famous

385 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:34:09pm

re: #369 Charles

Just because, I can...
How come the comment loads as "8,003,064" if it's 8,000,000?
Does one count include deleteys?
Just curious.

You WON THE TOASTER!

386 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:34:35pm

re: #379 windsagio

it would be interesting to see by the way, how the post count is accellerating (presuming it is), and how much faster 8m-10m will be than 5m-8m was.

Very fast, imo, especially once those Times profiles hit both coasts!

387 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:35:08pm

I don't know about you but quite frankly I think most of these people would be quite at home as the most of the Galtics in David Brinn's Uplift novels...

"How dare those impudent wolfings claim to have been able to have achieved such things on their own! They must have had a patron, they must have!"

388 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:35:09pm

re: #382 fenrisdesigns

Right now, we look kinda like this:


[Video]

Perfect

389 The Shadow Do  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:35:26pm

re: #377 albusteve

almost orgasmic...here it comes!

Foul! .01 second difference! You were fouled Steve, I think you even get three free throws for that.

390 albusteve  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:35:34pm

Charles deserves a calender and more...I'm out like Ernie Shavers

391 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:35:42pm

re: #388 Naso Tang

Which one of us is David Bowie, which is Toby? Let's fight for it!

392 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:35:55pm

re: #369 Charles

Yep.

It was this one, all right:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Can we nominate that for a rotating title too? It works on so many levels.

393 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:36:00pm

re: #350 Charles

I didn't mean to do that! Sorry to hog the glory.

Anyone want to guess the number of "other" blogs that decry you for [what I'm sure they'll say is] stealing the 8,000,000th comment on your own site?

I'd put the line at 5. And I'd be likely to take the over.

394 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:36:26pm

re: #307 iceweasel

Yes, but that's the epitome of 'female strength' seen as a terrifying and destructive force.
It's no coincidence that that emphasizes sexuality, either. You can still find that 'blue angel' archetype of 'female as destroyer' motivating all sorts of works.

Great movie examples btw!

So what else under the sun (male solar symbol) is new? Lilith, Venus, Virgin, Harlot, Sorceress and on and on. What strength in those archetypes, and each woman contains all of them. I don't see them being created by what male consciousness is able to objectify so much as a necessary counterpart to the masculine in itself. Each extreme conditions the other and makes life - such as it is - possible for ordinary folks like ourselves.

395 Charles Johnson  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:36:43pm

re: #385 Floral Giraffe

Just because, I can...
How come the comment loads as "8,003,064" if it's 8,000,000?
Does one count include deleteys?
Just curious.

You WON THE TOASTER!

Because the numbers are not strictly contiguous. There are some gaps, due to various technical reasons.

396 EastSider  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:36:44pm

re: #369 Charles

Yep.

It was this one, all right:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

That's what she said?

397 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:37:02pm

re: #391 fenrisdesigns

Which one of us is David Bowie, which is Toby? Let's fight for it!

I'm the good looking smart one.

398 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:38:15pm

re: #397 Naso Tang

I'm the good looking smart one.

Wearing diapers?

399 Dancing along the light of day  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:38:39pm

re: #395 Charles

Well, I do hope you enjoy the new toaster!
May the wisdom of the lizardia speed your comments to 10,000,000!

400 Sharmuta  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:38:41pm

re: #379 windsagio

it would be interesting to see by the way, how the post count is accellerating (presuming it is), and how much faster 8m-10m will be than 5m-8m was.

While page views and visits are up, the comments are down lately, actually.

401 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:39:04pm

re: #397 Naso Tang

I'm the good looking smart one.

Good, good, now to look for our David Bowie.

402 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:39:10pm

re: #395 Charles

Albusteve and Sharmuta are sitting on the shoulders of your post. That's fitting.

403 ElCapitanAmerica  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:39:26pm

Charles;

That's pretty stupid, there's also the trend of trying to scare people from "magic" books; like the whole Harry Potter non-troversy.

However, I find the term "religious right" to be horribly inexact here. I don't know much about that site, but that's just some random pastor saying this. How does this represent the "religious right"?

I'm pretty religious, but not a fundamentalist, but while I would concede a lot of fundamentalist seem to be cautious against books that "exclude the possibility of God" (not many really as many sci-fi books don't even touch the subject) I'm not even sure if they would all or mostly agree with this.

However, I don't know if I would identify this train of non-thought as a political thing (related to the religious right). Maybe I'm making a technical point, but this is like posting some random musings about an atheist group that is hostile against religion and promotes some inane ideas.

404 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:39:34pm

re: #37 political lunatic

Screw you GOP, I'm gonna go start my own political party! with blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget the political party!

405 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:40:05pm

re: #403 ElCapitanAmerica

Yes, the religious right exists.

Sorry.

406 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:40:06pm

re: #403 ElCapitanAmerica

...Huh?

407 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:40:10pm

Did anyone Read:

The City and the City by China Mielville. I think it counts towards "weird fiction" more than science fiction, but it was bizarre and VERY VERY good. I learned about it from one of the above mentioned podcasts.

Highy recommended.

I also enjoyed Anathem by Neal Stephenson.

Right now I'm listening to Hyperion by Dan Simmons. The narration is excellent, the story's OK so far.

Rainbow's End by Verner Vinge absolutely blew my mind --showed me how old I am.

Has anyone read the final Robert Jordan book? It's been so long since I finished the last one f the series, I don't know if I want to revisit it if the final book isn't worth it.

408 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:40:12pm

re: #400 Sharmuta

Thats surprising. I'll have to try to figure out the stats page to look at it >

409 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:40:32pm

re: #394 ryannon

So what else under the sun (male solar symbol) is new? Lilith, Venus, Virgin, Harlot, Sorceress and on and on. What strength in those archetypes, and each woman contains all of them. I don't see them being created by what male consciousness is able to objectify so much as a necessary counterpart to the masculine in itself. Each extreme conditions the other and makes life - such as it is - possible for ordinary folks like ourselves.

I think all the archetypes you mention privilege female sexuality over all other attributes of the female, even where that power involves her withholding of sex (as in the Virgin archetype), in a way that male archetypes don't (primarily) emphasize male sexuality (although it is there too, of course).

410 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:40:49pm

re: #407 ggt

Ggt, hyperion is one of my favorites.

I also suggest to everyone all the novels of Ian M. Banks, especially

The Player of Games

411 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:40:54pm

Upding for Rainbow's End

412 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:41:04pm
Take CARL SAGAN, for example. His best-selling sci-fi novel Contact was made into a movie. Sagan was one of the high priests of atheistic evolution.

Oh brother, you just can't write comedy like that. The "article" reminds me of one an ex-lizard linked for me way back. I wish I could find it. It was about how very young males ("Silly Boys") who behave in a goofy and less than serious manner are an affront to God. It was a hilarious load of crap, and was sadly taken very seriously by the person who linked it.

413 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:41:06pm

re: #403 ElCapitanAmerica

Charles;

That's pretty stupid, there's also the trend of trying to scare people from "magic" books; like the whole Harry Potter non-troversy.

However, I find the term "religious right" to be horribly inexact here. I don't know much about that site, but that's just some random pastor saying this. How does this represent the "religious right"?

I'm pretty religious, but not a fundamentalist, but while I would concede a lot of fundamentalist seem to be cautious against books that "exclude the possibility of God" (not many really as many sci-fi books don't even touch the subject) I'm not even sure if they would all or mostly agree with this.

However, I don't know if I would identify this train of non-thought as a political thing (related to the religious right). Maybe I'm making a technical point, but this is like posting some random musings about an atheist group that is hostile against religion and promotes some inane ideas.

Many of us, well me, prefer the term Whackos to any other labelling system.

414 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:41:16pm

re: #398 EmmmieG

Wearing diapers?

That seems smart to me.

415 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:41:40pm

re: #406 Varek Raith

took the words right out of my mouth.

416 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:41:57pm

re: #403 ElCapitanAmerica

Harry Potter does not exclude God. Actual doctrine is left alone. I thought she was very wise not to touch theology while promoting values and morals.

417 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:42:13pm

re: #412 Slumbering Behemoth

Oh brother, you just can't write comedy like that. The "article" reminds me of one an ex-lizard linked for me way back. I wish I could find it. It was about how very young males ("Silly Boys") who behave in a goofy and less than serious manner are an affront to God. It was a hilarious load of crap, and was sadly taken very seriously by the person who linked it.

[Link: firstchurchofatheism.com...]

418 jaunte  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:42:55pm

re: #413 ggt

Many of us, well me, prefer the term Whackos to any other labelling system.


Upding for classic quote which I'm stealing in another context.

419 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:43:22pm

re: #410 Obdicut

Man I'm glad I checked first, I confused 'Player of Games' with 'Enders Game' and was gonna make a joke about crazy religious authors >>

420 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:43:24pm

re: #412 Slumbering Behemoth

Oh brother, you just can't write comedy like that. The "article" reminds me of one an ex-lizard linked for me way back. I wish I could find it. It was about how very young males ("Silly Boys") who behave in a goofy and less than serious manner are an affront to God. It was a hilarious load of crap, and was sadly taken very seriously by the person who linked it.

Okay, okay, one more:

421 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:43:44pm

re: #85 stevemcg

Really? I couldn't stand Foundation because I have serious issues with the idea that humanity's actions as a whole can be reduced to a simple math formula give or take. Only book I liked was Foundation and Empire because the "Foundies" spend the second half of it getting their butts kicked.

422 ElCapitanAmerica  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:44:00pm

re: #416 EmmmieG

Some of the fundamentalist groups are against Harry Potter because they think it promotes witchcraft ... which is inane of course.

423 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:44:11pm

re: #410 Obdicut

Ggt, hyperion is one of my favorites.

I also suggest to everyone all the novels of Ian M. Banks, especially

The Player of Games

Doesn't look like it's in audio version yet, but I put it in my Amazon wish list.

thanks!

424 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:44:53pm

re: #422 ElCapitanAmerica

Some of the fundamentalist groups are against Harry Potter because they think it promotes witchcraft ... which is inane of course.

Once kids figure out that they aren't going to get a wand and get instant results...

425 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:45:32pm

re: #419 windsagio

Ian M. Banks is probably my favorite science fiction writer, in terms of creating a very believable, ultra-far-future universe. Nobody else I know can write with his scope and his attention to the personal at the same time. He shows you gigantic galaxy-spanning civilizations, but he always uses the lens of the individuals. He's really, really a master.

426 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:45:42pm

re: #424 EmmmieG

...then they'll remember everything their parents said about prayer.

427 ElCapitanAmerica  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:46:09pm

re: #405 Obdicut

I probably didn't explain myself well, but I didn't say there was no such thing as the "religious right" ... what I was questioning was the idea that the "religious right" as a movement is really anti science fiction when this is just some random article by I assume a random Baptist Minister.

I mean, are they trying to pass legislation to ban sci-fi books/movies?

Creationism, yes, part of the evangelical religious right. But this? I'm not really sure.

428 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:46:11pm

re: #409 iceweasel

I think all the archetypes you mention privilege female sexuality over all other attributes of the female, even where that power involves her withholding of sex (as in the Virgin archetype), in a way that male archetypes don't (primarily) emphasize male sexuality (although it is there too, of course).

In that case, I'd like to see you (or anyone) propose an example that's outside the box, so to speak. I don't think it's possible. I'm considering all this as we discuss it - meaning that I'm not working from an a priori...

429 Varek Raith  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:46:21pm

re: #424 EmmmieG

Once kids figure out that they aren't going to get a wand and get instant results...

Seriously...all this talk of whichcraft and sorcery... Has anyone been successful in casting any kind of spell?
/I sure as hell haven't! :(
:)

430 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:46:39pm

I thought the female characters in the March UpCountry series by David Weber and John Ringo were REALLY well done. I was very surpised that a male author wrote them.

431 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:47:02pm

re: #424 EmmmieG

Once kids figure out that they aren't going to get a wand and get instant results...

Which is a shame. I'd like to wave a magic wand at the fundies and make their craziness disappear.

432 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:47:13pm

re: #429 Varek Raith

Someone cursed the 1st HP movie. They should have hired him to curse all the movies.

433 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:47:25pm

re: #425 Obdicut

David Brin's best books are like that too (ie the first Uplift books).

And oh yeah, I Love Ian Banks! Orson Scott Card, on the other hand, is a lunatic.

434 Kragar  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:48:01pm

I'm going to have to bust out all my Gaunt's Ghosts books now, just so I can read some Sci-Fi about soldiers fighting for the God-Emperor of Man.

435 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:48:06pm

re: #429 Varek Raith

when I was an obnoxious little douche in College, I used to go around and challenge Pagans to cast spells on me. To their credit nobody ever did!

436 Pip's Squeak  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:48:43pm

A favorite is Brian Aldiss, The Helliconia Trilogy.

437 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:48:48pm

re: #430 ggt

I thought the female characters in the March UpCountry series by David Weber and John Ringo were REALLY well done. I was very surpised that a male author wrote them.

Both Weber and Ringo have written good female characters. I I'm a fan of both of them.

438 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:48:54pm

re: #119 EmmmieG

If you like strong women in Science Fiction, take a look at David Weber's Honor Harrington Books...

439 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:49:14pm

re: #427 ElCapitanAmerica

Argument from personal disbelief really isn't much of an argument.

The religious right are typified by zeal and authoritarianism. That's what makes them the religious right. The exist, and, typified by people like Dobson, have enormous political power and reach. If you'll remember, two presidential candidates were interviewed by Pastor Rick Warren, in a very obvious demonstration of the power of the religious right.

Your argument of personal incredulity looks pretty weak when compared to the access Dobson has been given.

440 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:49:52pm

re: #420 fenrisdesigns

Ha! Love the agnostic protest signs: "There's possibly no such thing as atheists!" & "Say Maybe to God".

441 tradewind  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:51:00pm

re: #301 fenrisdesigns
It was from State of the Union,, ' JK's Five-city litigation tour/JK sues a preschool '
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...] ( scroll down to Season Two, Episode 203. Sorry I couldn't find a clip).

442 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:51:46pm

re: #434 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Nerd!
/

443 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:52:08pm

re: #428 ryannon

In that case, I'd like to see you (or anyone) propose an example that's outside the box, so to speak. I don't think it's possible. I'm considering all this as we discuss it - meaning that I'm not working from an a priori...

Other than my own swinish male chauvinism, of course.

And to answer my own question: Bella Abzug?

444 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:52:26pm

re: #142 SanFranciscoZionist

Don't forget "They are so worried about being 'taken in' that they refuse to be taken out." Because the people who do good things in the name of an evil god get rewarded but those who do good things and don't believe in god get to spend eternity locked in an imaginary stable...

445 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:52:34pm

re: #417 fenrisdesigns

[Link: firstchurchofatheism.com...]

How you found that I won't ask, and why someone went to the trouble of setting it up I won't ask either, but it has a really cool rotating earth on the bottom of the page showing all the recent hits to the website, including one from Dawsonville Georgia, which I am guessing is me.

Charles should consider doing something like that. It would be interesting.

446 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:52:36pm

I have to apologize if this was discussed months ago, but I just recently saw the new Star Trek movie.

I don't know what I think about a Spock (alternative universe or not) who is in touch with his feelings? Thoughts Lizards?

Also, at the end when they created the singularity with red matter --does that create another alternative universe and send the Romulan, Nero, there?

447 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:53:20pm

re: #441 tradewind

Dang. That actually sounds kinda funny.

448 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:53:49pm

re: #422 ElCapitanAmerica

Some of the fundamentalist groups are against Harry Potter because they think it promotes witchcraft ... which is inane of course.

Kind of like asking Santa Claus for something, I suppose./

449 ElCapitanAmerica  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:54:39pm

re: #439 Obdicut

True, but as a non-member of the fundamentalist wing of Christianity I'm asking why I'm to assume that part of the "religious right" is an agenda or dogma against science fiction books or movies. I mentioned a famous example before (Harry Potter) which is not sci-fi, but I've never heard of a popular support for this idea outside of this article by this Southern Baptist.

In other words, why does this article prove that this is part of the "religious right" agenda? Is this something that the leaders of that movement (whoever they are) also promote? I think it takes more than some random article from some random wacko fundamentalist pastor.

Or you think it's not fair to question this conclusion based on the evidence given?

450 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:54:51pm

re: #445 Naso Tang

How you found that I won't ask, and why someone went to the trouble of setting it up I won't ask either, but it has a really cool rotating earth on the bottom of the page showing all the recent hits to the website, including one from Dawsonville Georgia, which I am guessing is me.

Charles should consider doing something like that. It would be interesting.

Very carefully. Appears they just embedded the map from another website called Revolvermaps.

451 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:55:29pm

re: #170 Ojoe

How is chess a game of chance? Flip a coin to see who is black and who is white? The mind boggles...

452 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:55:46pm

re: #446 ggt

I always felt the old Spock was in touch with his feelings, but combating them. Not violently, but in a constant suppressive struggle.

453 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:56:19pm

re: #428 ryannon

In that case, I'd like to see you (or anyone) propose an example that's outside the box, so to speak. I don't think it's possible. I'm considering all this as we discuss it - meaning that I'm not working from an a priori...

I don't think it's currently possible to do that. I've been agreeing with you, btw, just expanding on your thoughts.
One would expect the female archetypes to all involve female sexuality primarily, given that it's only very recently in human history that females truly had autonomy, in the sense of having control over their reproductive destinies (not to mention sexual freedom).
And as we know, that doesn't even apply to most of the women in the world right now, just the Western world.

454 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:56:36pm

re: #449 ElCapitanAmerica

Perhaps you might do a google search for Harry Potter book bannings?

455 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:57:08pm

re: #454 Obdicut

Perhaps you might do a google search for Harry Potter book bannings?

Three words for children in areas where the books are banned: The Pirate Bay.

456 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:59:01pm

re: #452 Obdicut

I always felt the old Spock was in touch with his feelings, but combating them. Not violently, but in a constant suppressive struggle.

Well, yes, he was --I thought the whole Vulcan thing was not to struggle with feelings at all, but to find a way to accept them and not let them affect one's thoughts or actions --like an Eastern Aesthetic.

This Spock seems to have chosen to emnbrace his human side instead of his Vulcan side. Thus, he snogs (Harry Potter term) Uhura etc.

It is an interesting device the Star Trek gurus have chosen to explore in the alternative universe.

457 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:59:07pm

re: #446 ggt

I rather liked the younger Spock in the new Trek film. Spock's always had an emotional side, but in this new film, we see him at an earlier age where he's got less control and more of a fire in his eyes.

And honestly? The way he says "Live Long and Prosper" to the Vulcan Science Academy might as well be a giant flashing sign that says "Fuck you!" I loved that. It was a nice spin on things, IMO.

458 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:59:33pm

re: #449 ElCapitanAmerica

I think you don't get around enough. This is not an isolated example. I have randomly surfed the channels and seen sermons against Harry Potter in the "Mega" churches. Whether or not it is standard is irrelevant to the fact that it is symptomatic.

459 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 9:59:57pm

re: #454 Obdicut

Perhaps you might do a google search for Harry Potter book bannings?

or book burnings.. . .

460 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:00:55pm

re: #221 Killgore Trout

Of course if memory serves originally her character was suppose to be male and they decided to make her female just for a lark, so maybe not the best possible example...

461 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:01:40pm

re: #457 Lidane

I rather liked the younger Spock in the new Trek film. Spock's always had an emotional side, but in this new film, we see him at an earlier age where he's got less control and more of a fire in his eyes.

And honestly? The way he says "Live Long and Prosper" to the Vulcan Science Academy might as well be a giant flashing sign that says "Fuck you!" I loved that. It was a nice spin on things, IMO.

It is. I think it's a sign of my old age that I have a hard time with the change. Spock "should" (dammit!:) be an absolute--Like apple pie and . . .

:)

462 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:01:47pm

re: #457 Lidane

I rather liked the younger Spock in the new Trek film. Spock's always had an emotional side, but in this new film, we see him at an earlier age where he's got less control and more of a fire in his eyes.

And honestly? The way he says "Live Long and Prosper" to the Vulcan Science Academy might as well be a giant flashing sign that says "Fuck you!" I loved that. It was a nice spin on things, IMO.

That was actually a bit of a shocker, in that since Heroes, I always imagined Zachary Quinto as rough around the edges. He really seems to hide that in Star Trek.

463 Flame Fin Tomini Tang  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:02:29pm

re: #450 fenrisdesigns

Very carefully. Appears they just embedded the map from another website called Revolvermaps.

I presume that is not illegal, but we do have many from of all over the world here. Would be interesting to see it live, in views as well as posts.

464 ryannon  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:03:02pm

re: #453 iceweasel

If my brain continues to function, I'll attempt to continue this discussion over on the new thread...

465 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:03:16pm

re: #461 ggt

they really agree with you. Notice that Nimoy was the only guy that really got a Cameo >>

466 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:03:42pm

re: #236 EmmmieG

You want to talk about Terry Pratchett's female characters and you don't bring up Angua? For shame!

467 Millicent Islam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:03:47pm

re: #464 ryannon

If my brain continues to function, I'll attempt to continue this discussion over on the new thread...

Cool! meet you there! (warning, I have the flu. Brain not working so well right now.)

468 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:04:15pm

We are going upstairs?

469 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:07:27pm

re: #462 fenrisdesigns

That was actually a bit of a shocker, in that since Heroes, I always imagined Zachary Quinto as rough around the edges. He really seems to hide that in Star Trek.

I don't think he hid much at all, considering that his Spock not only tells the Vulcans to piss off, but he maroons Kirk, and then tries to kill him later (of course, he was provoked into it, but whatever), AND he wasn't exactly all that sympathetic towards Nero when Kirk offers the Romulans a chance to escape their ship. Quinto's Spock is younger, and more brash than Nimoy's, but you can see the beginnings of his character eventually becoming the older version of Spock over time.

Maybe that's just me, though. YMMV. :)

470 ElCapitanAmerica  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:08:01pm

re: #454 Obdicut

I mentioned the Harry Potter fiasco at least 2 times (if not 3) in my posts. Maybe you need to read the one I was replying to you again.

You really think Harry Potter is science fiction???

471 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:08:23pm

re: #466 jamesfirecat

Tiffany Aching. Cheery Littlebottom (who was the biggest feminist in the entire book series.) Adorabelle Dearheart (Spike). Sacharissa Cripslock.

Pratchett loves strong women characters.

472 Arby Dwiar  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:08:37pm

re: #304 Charles

Whoa, here it comes now...

Your timing was impeccable!

473 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:09:21pm

re: #469 Lidane

I don't think he hid much at all, considering that his Spock not only tells the Vulcans to piss off, but he maroons Kirk, and then tries to kill him later (of course, he was provoked into it, but whatever), AND he wasn't exactly all that sympathetic towards Nero when Kirk offers the Romulans a chance to escape their ship. Quinto's Spock is younger, and more brash than Nimoy's, but you can see the beginnings of his character eventually becoming the older version of Spock over time.

Maybe that's just me, though. YMMV. :)

For an alternate universe (according to Memory Alpha, anyway,) that very much seems to work.

474 Obdicut  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:09:34pm

re: #470 ElCapitanAmerica

Seriously, you want to draw a distinction between fantasy and science fiction for this? Science fiction often includes magic, too-- like the force.

Also, one question mark is sufficient.

475 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:10:15pm

re: #473 fenrisdesigns

Plus for Memory Alpha reference :)

476 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:10:28pm

re: #336 Charles

Wow, it's like the Episode of the Simpsons where someone at the baseball games win a free car, and it turns out to be Montgomery Burns...

477 ggt  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:11:35pm

I'm off to the world of Hyperion.

Have a great evening all!

478 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:11:56pm

re: #471 EmmmieG

You forgot Susan Death's niece...

479 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:12:53pm

re: #475 windsagio

Plus for Memory Alpha reference :)

When you spend all your time in Trekkie sims in Second Life, MA becomes your BFF Rose.

480 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:13:14pm

re: #473 fenrisdesigns

For an alternate universe (according to Memory Alpha, anyway,) that very much seems to work.

It's not the Mirror Universe, but it works in its own way. ;)

481 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:14:44pm

re: #478 jamesfirecat

You forgot Susan Death's niece...

Susan Sto-Helit is Death's granddaughter, but I did forget her.

/I know way too much about this stuff.

482 Fenris  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:15:14pm

re: #480 Lidane

It's not the Mirror Universe, but it works in its own way. ;)

Alternate realities. What better way to violate the dreams of your oldest fans, leave them face-down in the gutter, and still insist it's canon?

483 ElCapitanAmerica  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:18:32pm

re: #474 Obdicut

There is a big difference between fantasy and science fiction. Of course, there are some movies and works that mix the two (Star Wars is a good example although some would argue that it is more fantasy than sci-fi).

Many of the examples cited in that article are what science fiction and even "hard" science fiction. And nobody would ever really group those works with something like Harry Potter at all.

Note that the main complaint from fundamentalist on Harry Potter I believe was the whole "it promotes witchcraft", which is really a complaint that makes even less sense of an Asimov book.

484 jamesfirecat  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:19:56pm

re: #434 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Please everyone knows there is only one true person who is worthy of fighting for the glory of the God Emperor...

Ciaphas Cain HERO OF THE IMPERUIUM!

485 Lidane  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:20:25pm

re: #482 fenrisdesigns

To be fair, it was the only way to make a new Trek film with the original characters.

With DeForest Kelley and James Doohan both dead and the rest of the original cast far along in years, and with the Spock character basically living in the TNG universe in the original canon because he's all but outlived the others, the only way to reboot Trek at all was to create an alternate timeline and start all over again.

486 UncleSam  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:20:55pm

If you want to read a really great scifi novel, read Summer of Love by Lisa Mason, if you can find it. (Out of print, but used copies available at Amazon.com.) Unbelievably good stuff.
Or the Wild Cards series, edited by George R.R. Martin, or the Worldwar series by Harry Turtledove.

[Link: www.amazon.com...]
[Link: www.amazon.com...]
[Link: www.amazon.com...]

487 windsagio  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:22:57pm

re: #479 fenrisdesigns

When I first found out about MA, I spent an evening reading the plot synopsis' of every episode of the series' I didn't like (Voyager and DS9, if you're curious).

Its a great site.

488 abolitionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 10:55:49pm

re: #128 prairiefire

Carl Sagen is teh awesome. I'm going to read up on his theory that we carry ancestral "memory in our DNA. I think he is right.

Growing up, it didn't make much sense to me that so much of our entertainment seemed to be designed to frighten -- carnival sideshows, thrill rides, Hitchcock, westerns, murder mystery novels, sci-fi, Dracula, werewolves, Rodan, tales from the dark side, outer limits, etc.

After seeing Quest for Fire, it occured to me that being scared shitless several times per month had likely been the norm for many thousands of years. We'd been conditioned to it.

489 RexMundi  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 11:17:00pm

The thing that bothers me about a lot of science fiction actually? Many of the aliens are NOT what one would expect to see, given the fact of evolution.

Star Wars aliens are just a mixture of various body parts found in nature and wild colors. Avatar makes little sense having tall blue aliens in lush green forests that ride florescent dragons.

I could go on, but I'll spare people from me being too much of a nerd. :)

490 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 11:21:33pm

re: #217 Killgore Trout

Fiction in general. I could never sit down and read a Jane Austen novel. I'd kill myself instead. Same goes for that douchebag who wrote Wuthering Heights. They might be good female characters but I'll be damned if a heterosexual male could endure them.

That would be Emily Bronte you're referring to? That douchebag?

/Good GOD, man.

491 shimoda  Wed, Jan 6, 2010 11:47:05pm

Am I the only one who thinks that Gandalf was the a cool character but the worst wizard ever.
He had no tricks worth anything. He could crack a stone bridge with his staff, talk to butterflies and ... that's about it. Useless. But a cool hat, I'll give him that.

Saw Avatar the other day. The story was predictable and lame but the technique. Mind blowing. "It's the way of the future". Excellent.

492 sffilk  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 5:43:46am

re: #6 kreyagg

Obviously they prefer fantasy.

I doubt it, since a lot of fantasy has no obvious religion either.

493 sffilk  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 5:45:06am

re: #24 SanFranciscoZionist

I'm tempted to suggest "On Venus Have We Got A Rabbi", except that they would undoubtedly side with the people who say that the brown couch pillows with tentacles aren't really Jews.

Fine story, anyway. The backstory about what happened to the State of Israel is almost worth the price of admission.

Isn't that part of an anthology of Jewish-themed science fiction stories called, if I remember correctly, Wandering Stars or other somesuch?

494 sffilk  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 5:49:59am

Perhaps these people need to be reminded of how Ray Bradbury defined "science fiction" - that genre of literature which explores mankind's responses to changes in technology.

495 Feline Emperor of the Conservative Waste  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:06:23am

re: #234 EastSider


[snip]

Even if you ignore the obvious male/female loophole, this dark Lord was so stupid as to think he was invincible because "no man can kill him" in a world inhabited by dwarves, elves, and walking trees? Legolas coulda sniped him from 2,000 yards.

Pretty easily explained actually. The nine Nazgul were all powerful men who were enslaved by Sauron via the rings. Given that the head Nazgul had been a very powerful sorcerer while still mortal, and then gained this even more powerful form, are you at all surprised that his male ego reached such gargantuan levels of hubris?

/

496 Feline Emperor of the Conservative Waste  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:07:44am

re: #236 EmmmieG

Prattchet goes further along those lines with the Tiffany Aching character. (Tiffany's grandmother as well.)

497 Zathras  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:17:46am

ElCapitanAmerica

Some of the fundamentalist groups are against Harry Potter because they think it promotes witchcraft ... which is inane of course.

In fairness, there have been ludicrous statements about this against Harry Potter from more than just fundamentalist Christians. Here is Richard Dawkins saying that HP has a negative effect on children because it promotes magical thinking and not scientific thinking. Just another type of fundamentalist I suppose...

498 ElCapitanAmerica  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:35:57am

re: #497 Zathras

ElCapitanAmerica

In fairness, there have been ludicrous statements about this against Harry Potter from more than just fundamentalist Christians. Here is Richard Dawkins saying that HP has a negative effect on children because it promotes magical thinking and not scientific thinking. Just another type of fundamentalist I suppose...

Good point. Sort of what I was getting to, I wouldn't take Dawkins comments as a general representation of what atheist think (although by using some of the logic here, he is considered a 'leader' of the movement).

Somebody marked your post down, no idea why I'd like to hear why somebody would be against it.

499 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:44:51am

Did you read the 'article' from the Daily Fail?

500 John Vreeland  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:47:59am

The fundamentalists and evangelicals have been against Science Fiction since Jules Verne went to the moon. They just haven't been very vocal about it lately, but I have known a few friends who had been brought up as evangelicals but read science fiction like good little geeks. The cognitive dissonance was staggering, and and I always wondered how they hung on to that world view. It's no wonder that their churches consider SF to be evil.

501 hlazar  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:56:02am

I had a giggle about the happily married Robert Heinlein, an ex-navy officer, practicing polyandry.

502 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:57:06am

re: #498 ElCapitanAmerica

And please do take Dawkin's words as what athiests think, from that article. Here's what he said:

Looking back to my own childhood, the fact that so many of the stories I read allowed the possibility of frogs turning into princes, whether that has a sort of insidious affect on rationality, I'm not sure. Perhaps it's something for research

Sounds just like a fundie! Those fundamentalists, always recommending a subject be scientifically studied!

503 Lidane  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:58:10am

re: #494 sffilk

Perhaps these people need to be reminded of how Ray Bradbury defined "science fiction" - that genre of literature which explores mankind's responses to changes in technology.

Yeah, but we're talking about people who believe the world was created 6-10,000 years ago despite all the scientific evidence to the contrary. They also see the devil's influence in everything they don't understand, including technology.

They're driven by fear of change, and of anything that threatens their worldview and their (very weak, IMO) faith. It only stands to reason they'd be against both sci-fi and real science.

504 ElCapitanAmerica  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 7:17:58am

re: #502 Obdicut

His statement still sounds ridiculous, and saying "perhaps it should be studied" doesn't make it more reasonable. He's making an argument that is something potentially dangerous about fairy tales and fantasy stories involving magic, and I think we can use simple observation and realize that these things don't harm humanity at all.

Hey this imagination thing sounds dangerous, "perhaps we should study it's negative effect!!!"

I really think it's something that you would give a pass to that one statement in light of this article. Says a lot actually.

505 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 7:20:51am

re: #504 ElCapitanAmerica

Yes, saying that perhaps it should be studied-- when he's writing a book on magical thinking, and he'd be the one doing the studying-- is more reasonable.

Wanting to scientifically study something is kind of the definition of reasonable.

I really think it's something that you would give a pass to that one statement in light of this article. Says a lot actually.

I think it says a lot about you that you'll gladly pick up a few random quotes from a Daily Fail article in order to attack Dawkins and agree with a comparison that he's a fundamentalist.

506 ElCapitanAmerica  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 7:32:33am

I didn't say he's a "fundamentalist", and I didn't pick any random quotes, heck I didn't even find the article. Could you please let me know where I said he was some type of atheist "fundamentalist"?

507 ElCapitanAmerica  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 7:33:44am

And let me know if you don't want to have this discussion straight up front. I rather you do that than you voting down my comments just because you don't like them or they're not in agreement with what you are saying.

Thanks

508 Charles Johnson  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 8:52:00am

re: #497 Zathras

ElCapitanAmerica

In fairness, there have been ludicrous statements about this against Harry Potter from more than just fundamentalist Christians. Here is Richard Dawkins saying that HP has a negative effect on children because it promotes magical thinking and not scientific thinking. Just another type of fundamentalist I suppose...

That story is typical Daily Fail crap. Dawkins doesn't even mention the Harry Potter books -- they put those words in his mouth. He was talking about the dangers of raising children to believe in myths and fairytales, not Harry Potter specifically.

509 Charles Johnson  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 8:53:47am

re: #504 ElCapitanAmerica

No, he was not saying "imagination is dangerous," that's ridiculous. And if you'd ever read anything Dawkins has written, you'd know he does not believe any such thing.

He was talking about the danger of teaching children to believe myths. In other words, teaching myths as fact.

This really isn't a difficult concept to grasp, unless you're determined to distort it.

510 McNug  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 9:06:19am

What's next? Banning mystery novels because deductive reasoning is un-Christian?

511 Gus  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 9:15:00am

re: #497 Zathras

ElCapitanAmerica

In fairness, there have been ludicrous statements about this against Harry Potter from more than just fundamentalist Christians. Here is Richard Dawkins saying that HP has a negative effect on children because it promotes magical thinking and not scientific thinking. Just another type of fundamentalist I suppose...

In the first place, if you actually read the tabloid story, you will find that in no place in the article will you find Richard Dawkins saying anything specific about Harry Potter and neither will you find him saying "HP has a negative effect on children because it promotes magical thinking and not scientific thinking."

The actual quotes in that article from Dawkins were, "I think it is anti-scientific – whether that has a pernicious effect, I don't know," which was followed up by, "Looking back to my own childhood, the fact that so many of the stories I read allowed the possibility of frogs turning into princes, whether that has a sort of insidious affect on rationality, I'm not sure. Perhaps it's something for research" and that he "didn't know what to think about magic and fairytales."

Secondly, comparing Richard Dawkins to the pedestrian fundamentalist baptist preacher David Cloud and this matter is a complete non-starter. David Cloud for the most part expresses that science fiction is suspect mainly for the mere bigoted observation that the dominant authors were either atheists or agnostics and other (mystical) intangible comparisons.

If Dawkins were to make any observations, he at least would base them on grounded logic (the crane) as opposed to the Ouija board "sky crane" thinking from the likes of Cloud. As of yet, he has not and I doubt he will come to anything close to this bumpkin's observation.

512 Zathras  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 9:17:45am

re: #508 Charles

Charles, who teaches their children to believe in fairy tales? No one. And since no one does, what is he really afraid of? That the mere exposure is dangerous is only the answer to this I see.

513 ElCapitanAmerica  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 9:17:54am

re: #509 Charles

re: #509 Charles

Charles;

I wasn't saying that's what he said, but I was saying that questioning if fantasy books are harmful to children (like magic, fairytales, etc) is a bit ridiculous and was exaggerating it with an example.

As for the article, I'll take your word on it being an exaggeration, since I didn't like to it and I had never heard about that statement before (which seems really nutty).

514 Gus  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 9:20:54am

re: #511 Gus 802

"Sky crane" should be "skyhook." R.E., Daniel Dennett's metaphor.

515 Tigger2005  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 10:03:29am

When I was 14 or 15 or so and saw the cover of Robert Heinlein's "Friday" I had to have it.

I mean, buxom woman in a tight jumpsuit with the top unzipped to mid-chest, with short feathered hair and this sort of breathless, expectant expression...sent my teen hormones into overdrive.

I know you'll all appreciate me sharing that. :-)

516 Tigger2005  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 10:13:05am

I notice how the Religious Right often refers to the "God of the Bible." An interesting thing about the early Christians is that they regarded the Hebrew scriptures as a window into the mysteries of God, they did not believe that God was contained in those scriptures. They were all about finding the spiritual truths BEHIND the written word...as Paul said, "The letter kills, but the Spirit gives life." In the Gospels Jesus urges people to follow the spirit of the Law, not the letter of it.

But for the Religious Right today, God is contained within their narrow interpretation of the Bible. They essentially idolize the Bible. Interestingly, it appears that some of the more nationalistic among them have begun to idolize their ideology even MORE than they idolize the Bible. They're willing to basically rewrite the Bible to fit their far-right views. I see some of them are now claiming that the Constitution is a revealed text, on par with the Bible.

Regardless of what they claim, it's not about God for them. It's all about THEM, and their fears and insecurities and hatreds.

517 enigma3535  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 11:59:21am

#438 jamesfirecat:

I just finished re-reading the Honor Harrington series and, interesting maybe only to me, that series pretty much invalidates an assertion that all Sci-Fi is atheistic ... Christianity plays a very prominent role in the story of one part of man's colonization of space some 2K yrs in the future.

518 sffilk  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 1:15:52pm

re: #517 enigma3535

#438 jamesfirecat:

I just finished re-reading the Honor Harrington series and, interesting maybe only to me, that series pretty much invalidates an assertion that all Sci-Fi is atheistic ... Christianity plays a very prominent role in the story of one part of man's colonization of space some 2K yrs in the future.

Ah, another fan of the Honor-verse!

519 What, me worry?  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 1:31:55pm

So sorry I missed this thread, if anyone is still reading. My husband and I were watching LOTR on our new flat screen TV last couple nights!

It's completely understandable why the religious would like LOTR. The message is "The meek shall inherit the earth." It doesn't matter how big or little you are to make a difference to others, and in fact, the smaller, the better.

Frodo is not the brave soul as Bilbo was. He's pretty much a wussy, terrified at everything, yet he is the one who succeeds in saving the world. It's a great message.

Also, the stories aren't really based on magic in the sense that the Harry Potter books are. They are histories of people, places, languages. Much different than your average sci-fi. Tolkien was Roman Catholic yes? Some of his religious leanings do show through (I think).

Eowyn is probably the most significant women figure. She is the brave and beautiful warrior, often left behind by the men to do more "womanly duties" and yet she kills the most evil of all, the embodiment of Sauron, the Witch King. I like that she's well liked amongst her people and family. She's a wonderful role model.

520 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 1:38:59pm

re: #519 marjoriemoon

Tolkein is oft-accused of being racist, but given that he shows Man in general as corrupt, I don't really feel that's true.

Brian Jaques is like 500 times as racist.

521 Lidane  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 1:44:59pm

re: #519 marjoriemoon

Thing is, Frodo doesn't even succeed. The one who really comes through in the end is Samwise. Remember-- at the end, Frodo has been overcome by the ring and decides to keep it for himself. He and Gollum even fight over it. Samwise is the one who brings Frodo back to himself.

It's Sam's loyalty and friendship to Frodo and Gollum's greed for the ring that really end up saving the day, not Frodo himself. At least that's how I took it.

522 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 1:46:45pm

re: #521 Lidane

The question is: Did Gandalf know that Sam would overhear, and would come, and the role that he would play?

Eh? Eh?

523 What, me worry?  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 2:23:26pm

re: #521 Lidane

Thing is, Frodo doesn't even succeed. The one who really comes through in the end is Samwise. Remember-- at the end, Frodo has been overcome by the ring and decides to keep it for himself. He and Gollum even fight over it. Samwise is the one who brings Frodo back to himself.

It's Sam's loyalty and friendship to Frodo and Gollum's greed for the ring that really end up saving the day, not Frodo himself. At least that's how I took it.

heh My husband said the exact same thing.

524 What, me worry?  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 2:37:42pm

re: #520 Obdicut

Tolkein is oft-accused of being racist, but given that he shows Man in general as corrupt, I don't really feel that's true.

Brian Jaques is like 500 times as racist.

I'm not really familiar with Jacques. Maybe that's a good thing!

It's interesting that this is said about Tolkien, but I can see it. Indeed, the race of Men are corruptible and that's very much based on a Judeo/Christian ethic. Gondor, with the its castles, kings, stewards (i.e. England) and all the outlying cities are under Gondor's rule (English territories?). However, the tribes of the "East" were depicted as downright evil. In the movie, they look decidedly Arabian or Indian.

525 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 2:40:53pm

re: #524 marjoriemoon

Yes. I do agree that Tolkien was as racist as most people in his time, I just don't think he was especially racist for his time period. I mean, I don't think he went out of his way to write a racist book.

If that makes sense.

526 What, me worry?  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 2:54:18pm

re: #525 Obdicut

Yes. I do agree that Tolkien was as racist as most people in his time, I just don't think he was especially racist for his time period. I mean, I don't think he went out of his way to write a racist book.

If that makes sense.

I agree, but I don't consider Tokien racist. I mean, he fought in WWI and his experience in war influenced his works, of course. He does show the evil of men, too.

527 What, me worry?  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 3:05:21pm

re: #525 Obdicut

Yes. I do agree that Tolkien was as racist as most people in his time, I just don't think he was especially racist for his time period. I mean, I don't think he went out of his way to write a racist book.

If that makes sense.

Not to beat a dead thread to death and if the Wiki has any truth, here's an interesting read on Tolkien's personal and religious views.

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

528 enigma3535  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 6:18:11pm

re: #518 sffilk

Ah, another fan of the Honor-verse!

Sometime in the last decade, Weber became my favorite author* [GRRM could have been, but he writes too sparingly] ... Honor-verse is certainly very good but my favorite Weber novels are the Stars at War series ... John Ringo had also been pretty great early on in his writing ... recently, not so much [IMHO, Gust Front is phenomenal and my favorite book in the last 10 yrs].

Interesting Weber thought? His most recent series [Safehold] appears to have Christian protagonist fighting against a perversion of a Christianist-like faith that is ruled by a corrupt clergy ... indirectly commenting on our times?

* A position that has changed over time ... previous favs [in chronological order]: F.W. Dixon, E. R. Burroughs, R.A. Heinlein, S. King, T. Clancy and R.A. Salvatore.

529 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 7, 2010 7:02:36pm

re: #527 marjoriemoon

Nifty. Hadn't actually seen that statement by him. Nice.

530 meeshlr  Fri, Jan 8, 2010 7:35:20am

re: #433 windsagio

David Brin's best books are like that too (ie the first Uplift books).

And oh yeah, I Love Ian Banks! Orson Scott Card, on the other hand, is a lunatic.

Why do you say that?


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Name:

Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...


► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

What's the ugliest part of your body?

TwitterFacebook
LGF Pages
Recent Pages

MikeySDCA
Czech Pride in Jan Kubis, Killer of Reinhard Heydrich
6 minutes ago
Views: 2 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

researchok
'I Was Looking Forward to a Quiet Old Age': Instead, Etta Shiber, Helped Smuggle Stranded Allied Soldiers To Freedom
13 hours ago
Views: 162 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1

Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
20 hours, 41 minutes ago
Views: 148 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
21 hours, 33 minutes ago
Views: 162 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0

Michael McBacon
Kansas governor signs 'Shariah bill' to ban Islamic law
1 day, 2 hours ago
Views: 294 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 6

Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
2 days, 2 hours ago
Views: 644 • Comments: 11
Tweets: 21 • Rating: -7

MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
2 days, 3 hours ago
Views: 259 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1

Ascher
Israeli Who Saved Turk on Everest: You Never Abandon a Friend - Israel News, Ynetnews
2 days, 4 hours ago
Views: 329 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Haywood Jabloeme
The Harrassment of Patterico & Its Roots in Left-Wing Activism
2 days, 4 hours ago
Views: 563 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4

Curt
Brian Banks: (Video) Falsely accused of rape speaks out
2 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 305 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5

 Frank says:

May your shit come to life and kiss you on the face. -- to Mrs. Gore about parental advisory labels on album covers