Jon Stewart on Glenn Beck’s CPAC Speech
Here’s Jon Stewart’s hilarious take on Glenn Beck’s bizarre, rambling CPAC keynote speech.
" target="_blank">Comedy Central Video ” target=”_blank”>media.mtvnservices.com…]
Here’s Jon Stewart’s hilarious take on Glenn Beck’s bizarre, rambling CPAC keynote speech.
" target="_blank">Comedy Central Video ” target=”_blank”>media.mtvnservices.com…]314 comments
1![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:48:19am |
I loved Beck's "Chalk Caddies" are they actually named "Thomas" and "Pain"?
3![]() |
RogueOne Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:52:25am |
He brought his chalkboard with him? I wonder if he realizes he's jumped the shark.
4![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:53:06am |
re: #1 jamesfirecat
I loved Beck's "Chalk Caddies" are they actually named "Thomas" and "Pain"?
You're not seriously asking that question, are you?
5![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:53:18am |
Oh and I also love
"And we never got it back."
Especially since it was FDR who singed the Cullen-Harrison Act, and commented "I think this would be a good time for a beer."
6![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:53:56am |
And the irony of the Beckies is that mean revolution with a gun...
7![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:53:56am |
re: #4 Walter L. Newton
You're not seriously asking that question, are you?
If Glenn Beck was a James Bond Villain, I can imagine him calling them that...
8![]() |
webevintage Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:54:57am |
Damn socialist libaries, letting an idiot like Beck close to those "free" books.
9![]() |
teleskiguy Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:58:18am |
Glenn Beck is a raving freakazoid nut sandwich! Charles, thank you for this video. Still cracks me up!
10![]() |
Jeff In Ohio Tue, Feb 23, 2010 10:58:33am |
12![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:01:20am |
re: #4 Walter L. Newton
Hey, we're just asking the questions here.
[Link: www.southparkstudios.com...]
13![]() |
Charles Johnson Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:02:08am |
re: #11 Killgore Trout
I cracked up when she picked her teeth with the gun.
14![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:02:50am |
re: #6 LudwigVanQuixote
And the irony of the Beckies is that mean revolution with a gun...
I'm certain that there is a contingent of far right conservatives who would love to take their concerns to the streets with guns.
But that's not all just conservatives. Some of this sort of mentality depends on the region. I live in the West, in the mountains, there is sort of a "off grid" mentality attached to living up here. There are different political dynamics going on in regards to certain issues between liberal and conservatives.
There is a lot of agreement in regards to government intrusion in ones life. There's an interesting mixture of crazy going on.
15![]() |
Charles Johnson Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:04:48am |
Stormfront Nazis are having fits about LGF today. 66 hits from their website so far today.
JEB Stuart
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 189Re: "Little Green Footballs" - The Warmongering Israel-Firster Website Complains About Our Often Support Of Ron Pau
That chickenhawk who runs Little Green Footballs should be dropped in front of a squad of Basij militia.
16![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:05:16am |
re: #13 Charles
I cracked up when she picked her teeth with the gun.
My favorite use of a gun for a mundane purpose was when Homer used his to turn on the TV, and after managing to make the shot (after missing once or twice) it turns on a program just in time to see a cowboy holding his chest as he falls from a roof.
Sadly can't find the clip on Youtube...
18![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:08:30am |
re: #15 Charles
Stormfront Nazis are having fits about LGF today. 66 hits from their website so far today.
So seriously Charles, being hated by white trash nazi scum is a compliment.
I consider it an endorsement.
20![]() |
abbyadams Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:09:19am |
OOO, YOU LEAVE TR ALONE, GLENN BECK!
This self-professed leftie admires TR tremendously.
21![]() |
Vambo Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:10:16am |
Hi I'm Glenn Beck. Blah blah blah socialist Marxists, progressives, income taxes, no choices blah blah... How did I learn about all this? I went to the library, books are free. They appear out of thin air at my command, unlike progressive libraries that use socialist tax dollars.
22![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:10:36am |
re: #20 abbyadams
TR could beat Glen Beck to death with his piece of chalk. Not that he'd waste the time.
The man gave a speech after being shot. A long speech. After being shot.
23![]() |
drcordell Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:10:42am |
re: #15 Charles
That chickenhawk who runs Little Green Footballs should be dropped in front of a squad of Basij militia.
The irony of the fact that the Basij occupy nearly the exacty same space on the political spectrum must be completely lost on Stormfronters.
24![]() |
drcordell Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:12:13am |
re: #16 jamesfirecat
My favorite use of a gun for a mundane purpose was when Homer used his to turn on the TV, and after managing to make the shot (after missing once or twice) it turns on a program just in time to see a cowboy holding his chest as he falls from a roof.
Sadly can't find the clip on Youtube...
I think my favorite is when mobsters tell Homer they are going to pistol whip him, and he immediately starts dreaming about eating a giant tub of "kool whip" using a pistol as a utensil.
25![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:12:27am |
re: #15 Charles
Stormfront Nazis are having fits about LGF today. 66 hits from their website so far today.
"Our often support of Ron Paul..."?
Litterucy iz a Zionust conspeeracy.
26![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:12:44am |
This is a point I made earlier, but I think should be elaborated on so that feelings are not hurt. I want to address those respectable and good folks here who still call themselves conservative.
There is a difference between bashing conservatives (as they are today) and bashing those people who were conservative but whose movement has left them.
I think it is high time to wake up and smell the coffee.
What you mean by conservative is not what the leaders of the conservative movement are or mean by the word. Is being a follower of Robertson or Huckabee or the theocrats conservative like you? Is open hatred of gay people one of your conservative values? Conservative is not what most self described conservatives are today. Look at the legions who agree with Beck, Palin and Rush et al. Are you like them?
The people who are conservative in the meaning of the word that obtains today, kicked people like you out.
They call you rinos and traitors and progressives.
You are not them.
You would do yourself a huge favor if you realized that whatever your movement was, it is not that anymore and has not been that for some time.
27![]() |
Soap_Man Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:13:40am |
re: #20 abbyadams
OOO, YOU LEAVE TR ALONE, GLENN BECK!
This self-professed leftie admires TR tremendously.
Yeah. The Teddy Roosevelt bashing got my blood boiling. Glen Beck isn't half the man TR was. Hell, he isn't 10 percent of the man Teddy was.
I hope his ghost shows up and Judo-kicks Beck in the forehead.
28![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:13:58am |
re: #22 Obdicut
TR could beat Glen Beck to death with his piece of chalk. Not that he'd waste the time.
The man gave a speech after being shot. A long speech. After being shot.
To be fair I understand that the bullet was made slightly less dangerous because it passed through his glasses case and the papers he had written his speech on before it him. So in that case the fact that it was a long speech might have been in Teddy's favor.
Still that guy had balls of steel especially given that he started out life with asthma, "Death had to take Roosevelt sleeping, for if he had been awake, there would have been a fight."
29![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:15:16am |
re: #27 Soap_Man
Yeah. The Teddy Roosevelt bashing got my blood boiling. Glen Beck isn't half the man TR was. Hell, he isn't 10 percent of the man Teddy was.
I hope his ghost shows up and Judo-kicks Beck in the forehead.
Psssttt... Don't tell Beck, that in those days, the progressives were the GOP... and that TR was a Republican...
30![]() |
SanFranciscoZionist Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:15:18am |
re: #22 Obdicut
TR could beat Glen Beck to death with his piece of chalk. Not that he'd waste the time.
The man gave a speech after being shot. A long speech. After being shot.
I'm now having a vivid image of Teddy Roosevelt beating Glenn Beck to death with chalk. And then making a speech about it.
31![]() |
Racer X Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:15:22am |
32![]() |
SanFranciscoZionist Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:15:52am |
re: #23 drcordell
The irony of the fact that the Basij occupy nearly the exacty same space on the political spectrum must be completely lost on Stormfronters.
Irrevelevent to them, because they don't share the same skin shade or religion.
33![]() |
abbyadams Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:15:59am |
re: #22 Obdicut
Theodore Rex, and the rest of the volumes of Edmund Morris are a great read.
34![]() |
Soap_Man Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:16:03am |
The 5 Most Badass Presidents of All-Time
Unsurprisingly, Teddy is ranked #1.
35![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:16:17am |
re: #26 LudwigVanQuixote
And I'll repeat what I said:
I think that 'liberal' and 'conservative' are entirely arbitrary and false distinctions with no meaning, and that causes a lot of these arguments.
36![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:16:24am |
re: #31 Racer X
Thank you for explaining to me what I am. I would have never known.
/
Cleared things up for me too!
37![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:16:39am |
re: #33 abbyadams
Yeah, I've read 'em. Very, very well-written and researched. Loved how much time they spent on his academic pursuits.
38![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:16:51am |
re: #31 Racer X
Thank you for explaining to me what I am. I would have never known.
/
Dude, it was an attempt to differentiate you from those who deserve the wrath and disgust they get directed to them.
If you think that Beck and Palin and Rush and Robertson are good smart folks then say so and I can properly classify you.
39![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:17:18am |
re: #29 LudwigVanQuixote
That's no bull. Moose.
40![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:17:19am |
re: #35 Obdicut
And I'll repeat what I said:
I think that 'liberal' and 'conservative' are entirely arbitrary and false distinctions with no meaning, and that causes a lot of these arguments.
Do you have some other designations in mind?
41![]() |
SanFranciscoZionist Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:17:21am |
re: #27 Soap_Man
Yeah. The Teddy Roosevelt bashing got my blood boiling. Glen Beck isn't half the man TR was. Hell, he isn't 10 percent of the man Teddy was.
I hope his ghost shows up and Judo-kicks Beck in the forehead.
Teddy is busy. He might send Alice. She can handle Beck.
42![]() |
jaunte Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:17:59am |
re: #35 Obdicut
And I'll repeat what I said:
I think that 'liberal' and 'conservative' are entirely arbitrary and false distinctions with no meaning, and that causes a lot of these arguments.
Can we check the 'not really a joiner' box?
43![]() |
Feline Emperor of the Conservative Waste Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:18:14am |
re: #30 SanFranciscoZionist
And shouting "Bully!" while he did it... ;)
44![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:18:19am |
re: #31 Racer X
Thank you for explaining to me what I am. I would have never known.
/
Yes... you're just a thete in search of a phyle.
45![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:18:19am |
re: #39 lawhawk
That's no bull. Moose.
Really, he was a Bull moose when he was President?
Sorry, I have to call you on that :)
46![]() |
Racer X Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:18:24am |
re: #38 LudwigVanQuixote
Dude, it was an attempt to differentiate you from those who deserve the wrath and disgust they get directed to them.
If you think that Beck and Palin and Rush and Robertson are good smart folks then say so and I can properly classify you.
Ima keep it sekrit mkay?
/
I'm in a class all by myself tyvm.
47![]() |
SanFranciscoZionist Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:18:33am |
re: #34 Soap_Man
The 5 Most Badass Presidents of All-TimeUnsurprisingly, Teddy is ranked #1.
I can't access it. How high did Andrew Jackson get?
48![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:18:39am |
re: #40 Walter L. Newton
No. I don't think that any simple duality could possibly accurately represent it. I think the terms, and others like them, are just used by politicians and parties to create artificial alliances that quickly diverge from their origins.
I'm kind of Washingtonian about it.
49![]() |
Feline Emperor of the Conservative Waste Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:19:22am |
re: #47 SanFranciscoZionist
Probably pretty high since he attacked a would-be assassin armed with pistols with his cane.
50![]() |
ShaunP Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:19:46am |
51![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:20:21am |
re: #48 Obdicut
No. I don't think that any simple duality could possibly accurately represent it. I think the terms, and others like them, are just used by politicians and parties to create artificial alliances that quickly diverge from their origins.
I'm kind of Washingtonian about it.
I was serious in my question. Then how would you attempt to delineate one political philosophy from another?
52![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:20:22am |
re: #46 Racer X
Ima keep it sekrit mkay?
/
I'm in a class all by myself tyvm.
OK then don't take offense when I point out the evil, racist, ignorant, homophobic, theocratic, anti-American, anti-constitution, anti-human rights aspects of the conservatives. If you are in a class of your own, you are not them.
53![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:21:33am |
OT:
Anyone here speak Turkish?
A friend's website was hacked and the intruder left the following message: "Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye. Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane."
My attempt to get a machine translation resulted in gibberish.
Any clues?
54![]() |
Soap_Man Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:21:36am |
re: #47 SanFranciscoZionist
I can't access it. How high did Andrew Jackson get?
It goes like this.
5) Andrew Jackson
4) JFK (doesn't belong on the list, if you ask me. They took the chauvinist approach and gave him a lot of credit for the amount of women he slept with)
3) John Quincy Adams
2) George Washington
1) Teddy
55![]() |
drcordell Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:21:44am |
re: #51 Walter L. Newton
I was serious in my question. Then how would you attempt to delineate one political philosophy from another?
Through actual political discussions about individual issues and challenges facing our nation. Not arbitrary labels that really don't mean anything substantive.
56![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:21:47am |
re: #52 LudwigVanQuixote
OK then don't take offense when I point out the evil, racist, ignorant, homophobic, theocratic, anti-American, anti-constitution, anti-human rights aspects of the conservatives. If you are in a class of your own, you are not them.
You forgot "anti Ben and Jerry's"
57![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:22:04am |
re: #47 SanFranciscoZionist
I can't access it. How high did Andrew Jackson get?
He was ranked number 5
Four was JFK for using his family's political connections to weasel his way INTO military service despite possibly being rather sub optimally qualified for it, then proceeded to state that it took about three women a day to satisfy him.
Third was John Quincy Adams for his love of.. well making love our doors, swimming across the Potomac river nude, and keeping an alligator for a pet.
Second was George Washington for being somehow magically bullet proof...
58![]() |
blueraven Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:22:17am |
59![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:22:17am |
re: #56 Walter L. Newton
You forgot "anti Ben and Jerry's"
Bad for children and other living things. He forgot that one, too.
60![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:22:30am |
re: #55 drcordell
Through actual political discussions about individual issues and challenges facing our nation. Not arbitrary labels that really don't mean anything substantive.
That's no fun.
61![]() |
drcordell Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:22:38am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
OT:
Anyone here speak Turkish?
A friend's website was hacked and the intruder left the following message: "Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye. Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane."
My attempt to get a machine translation resulted in gibberish.
Any clues?
One of my co-workers does actually, let me run it past him.
62![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:23:24am |
re: #51 Walter L. Newton
By much, much finer distinctions. Also, the outputs of the same political philosophy held by two different people can be so different I'm not sure there is any point to distinguishing things at all.
63![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:23:26am |
re: #54 Soap_Man
It goes like this.
5) Andrew Jackson
4) JFK (doesn't belong on the list, if you ask me. They took the chauvinist approach and gave him a lot of credit for the amount of women he slept with)
3) John Quincy Adams
2) George Washington
1) Teddy
JFK stared straight into the face of a nuclear exchange, and sent the Navy anyway.
64![]() |
Buck Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:24:15am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
OT:
Anyone here speak Turkish?
A friend's website was hacked and the intruder left the following message: "Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye. Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane."
My attempt to get a machine translation resulted in gibberish.
Any clues?
I think "amiyane" is a turkish blog?
65![]() |
SanFranciscoZionist Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:24:30am |
re: #54 Soap_Man
It goes like this.
5) Andrew Jackson
4) JFK (doesn't belong on the list, if you ask me. They took the chauvinist approach and gave him a lot of credit for the amount of women he slept with)
3) John Quincy Adams
2) George Washington
1) Teddy
JFK is not my idea of a badass, no. What's with Adams? I don't know a lot about his presidency.
66![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:24:39am |
re: #34 Soap_Man
I heard that Truman was pissed he was missing from that list - a) he was in WWI and while in charge of an artillery battalion came under attack from the Germans. "During a sudden attack by the Germans in the Vosges Mountains, the battery started to disperse; Truman ordered them back into position using profanities that he had "learned while working on the Santa Fe railroad."[23] Shocked by the outburst, his men reassembled and followed him to safety". He cursed his men into action. And won.
Oh, and he dropped the Bomb. The A Bomb. In cracked.com world - that's the f'n bomb. It's so big that you capitalize it. /
67![]() |
ShaunP Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:24:48am |
re: #54 Soap_Man
It goes like this.
5) Andrew Jackson
4) JFK (doesn't belong on the list, if you ask me. They took the chauvinist approach and gave him a lot of credit for the amount of women he slept with)
3) John Quincy Adams
2) George Washington
1) Teddy
re: #63 Decatur Deb
JFK stared straight into the face of a nuclear exchange, and sent the Navy anyway.
Are we really arguing the merits of Cracked magazine's political reporting?
68![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:25:14am |
re: #62 Obdicut
By much, much finer distinctions. Also, the outputs of the same political philosophy held by two different people can be so different I'm not sure there is any point to distinguishing things at all.
I'll agree with that. I'm all over the place myself, there is no way you could put me in one bucket or another. And frequently cannot even tell someone in 10 words or less what my politics are.
69![]() |
drcordell Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:25:21am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
OT:
Anyone here speak Turkish?
A friend's website was hacked and the intruder left the following message: "Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye. Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane."
My attempt to get a machine translation resulted in gibberish.
Any clues?
He's translating now... expecting a call back shortly.
70![]() |
Feline Emperor of the Conservative Waste Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:25:33am |
re: #57 jamesfirecat
George was a bit of an outdoorsman in his younger days. Surveyor and also working with a land company in the "Ohio Country". Crossed some fairly nasty terrain in western PA in the dead of winter if I recall to deliver a message to the French asking them to clear off. (Credit as well to his guide, one Christopher Gist if I recall correctly.)
71![]() |
Soap_Man Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:26:14am |
re: #63 Decatur Deb
JFK stared straight into the face of a nuclear exchange, and sent the Navy anyway.
The list was based mostly on personal accomplishments unrelated to what they did in office. They talk about stuff that happened while in office, but mostly things unrelated to the job itself. For example, almost everything from Washington was about his service as general, not president. Most of the things about Teddy were about his badass hobbies. Etc.
72![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:26:34am |
re: #54 Soap_Man
It goes like this.
5) Andrew Jackson
4) JFK (doesn't belong on the list, if you ask me. They took the chauvinist approach and gave him a lot of credit for the amount of women he slept with)
3) John Quincy Adams
2) George Washington
1) Teddy
Hey, I feel JFK does deserve some credit for the entire fact that he used his family's connections to make sure get SENT TO WAR during WW2 rather than to get sent to the national guard like so many others did during Vietnam, that and the entire managing to drag a crew mate to safety by holding onto the guy's lifejacket with his teeth thing...
73![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:26:41am |
re: #67 ShaunP
Lost me on Cracked. Do they still publish?
74![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:27:25am |
re: #45 LudwigVanQuixote
Really, he was a Bull moose when he was President?
Sorry, I have to call you on that :)
TR formed the Bull Moose party in a schism with the GOP in the 1912 race that saw him lose to Taft in the primary. He then attempted a 3d party run. And lost. Many of his followers ended up going over to the Democrats - New Deal Democrats at that. (short history).
75![]() |
Buck Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:27:27am |
re: #73 Decatur Deb
Lost me on Cracked. Do they still publish?
got shot in the arm with the internet and Digg.
76![]() |
Soap_Man Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:27:38am |
re: #67 ShaunP
Are we really arguing the merits of Cracked magazine's political reporting?
LOL. Good point.
77![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:28:14am |
re: #71 Soap_Man
The list was based mostly on personal accomplishments unrelated to what they did in office. They talk about stuff that happened while in office, but mostly things unrelated to the job itself. For example, almost everything from Washington was about his service as general, not president. Most of the things about Teddy were about his badass hobbies. Etc.
OK, then. Going after Japanese destroyers in a plywood PT ain't shabby.
78![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:28:26am |
re: #71 Soap_Man
The list was based mostly on personal accomplishments unrelated to what they did in office. They talk about stuff that happened while in office, but mostly things unrelated to the job itself. For example, almost everything from Washington was about his service as general, not president. Most of the things about Teddy were about his badass hobbies. Etc.
Well then that raises the question is it about "the most badass people who were ever president" or "the most badass things done by a sitting president"?
And I realize how silly this debate is...
79![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:28:30am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
I was not familiar with unnecessary inuendo, always the same chanted phrase 'Amiyani bi'.
80![]() |
Soap_Man Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:29:58am |
re: #65 SanFranciscoZionist
JFK is not my idea of a badass, no. What's with Adams? I don't know a lot about his presidency.
From the article:
With his father away from home most of the time busying himself with the rebel cause, Adams, at age eight, was the man of the house. As if ensuring the safety and prosperity of an entire house before you even hit puberty isn't daunting enough, Adams had to do it all during a fucking war. He, in fact, often talked about watching the battle of Bunker Hill from his front porch, constantly worried about being, as he wrote in his diary, "butchered in cold blood, or taken and carried...as hostages by any foraging or marauding detachment of British soldiers." Remember when you were eight and you worried about missing Pokemon? Yeah. If you're feeling, perhaps, a little wet right now, it's because the ghost of an eight year old John Quincy Adams is pissing all over you as you read this.
81![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:30:55am |
re: #67 ShaunP
Are we really arguing the merits of Cracked magazine's political reporting?
One of the more pleasant things to argue about.
82![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:33:31am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
OT:
Anyone here speak Turkish?
A friend's website was hacked and the intruder left the following message: "Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye. Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane."
My attempt to get a machine translation resulted in gibberish.
Any clues?
Familiar unnecessary insinuation. The Colloquial ‘tabir’ is always the same old refrain.
83![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:34:41am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
In my experience, most Turkish-based hacks have something to do with arguments about the Armenian genocide, or lack thereof.
84![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:35:37am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
OT:
Anyone here speak Turkish?
A friend's website was hacked and the intruder left the following message: "Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye. Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane."
My attempt to get a machine translation resulted in gibberish.
Any clues?
Amiyane bi tabir (a name)
[Link: gerrain.blogspot.com...]
85![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:36:05am |
Another note:
For all my bashing on conservatives, I shall bash on the liberals now.
The gravest sin of the liberals is misplaced demands for sympathy and understanding to those who were clearly understood and are not sympathetic.
By suddenly describing, soft euphemisms and relativism as the "high road" we have been castrated as a culture when it comes to confronting real evils.
Darth Vader was misunderstood. See it from his point of view, it is just as valid as yours...
Charles Manson wasn't breast fed, it is not his fault.
Don't call evil evil, because it hurts the feelings of evil people. And there is no such thing as evil anyway. It is a judgmental word and we must expunge it from our more enlightened thinking.
A simple truth is that when you are merciful to those who deserve justice, you will inevitably be cruel to those who deserve mercy.
If you treat the stormfront monster as less than a monster, than you give him room and legitimacy to promote his evil agenda that will get innocent people killed.
If you say that the theocrats and anti-Americans of the modern conservative movement are just disagreeing - as if their views are valid, you validate evil when they talk of secession, racism, homophobia, anti-science, and tearing down your personal privacy.
If you cast thae AGW debate as just a debate, between equal parties, then you are condemning your children to horrors that will make the second world war pale in comparison.
Here is another truth.
In a place where there are no men, strive to be a man.
Do not give into the cowardice of avoiding confrontation. There is more at stake than just you if you are confronting evil.
86![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:36:43am |
re: #74 lawhawk
TR formed the Bull Moose party in a schism with the GOP in the 1912 race that saw him lose to Taft in the primary. He then attempted a 3d party run. And lost. Many of his followers ended up going over to the Democrats - New Deal Democrats at that. (short history).
But he started as a Republican which was my only real point.
We can both agree on the history :)
87![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:36:59am |
re: #67 ShaunP
Are we really arguing the merits of Cracked magazine's political reporting?
Well, it is more entertaining than Beck. And mind you that we're discussing Beck via Jon Stewart. Jon frakkin Stewart. On Comedy Central.
88![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:38:16am |
Glenn Beck et al. to old-fashioned conservatives: "All your movement is belong to us."
90![]() |
drcordell Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:38:33am |
re: #82 Bagua
Familiar unnecessary insinuation. The Colloquial ‘tabir’ is always the same old refrain.
My coworker's translation was similar:
Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye
"I was not familiar with your unnecessary expression (or reference, allusion)"
Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane
"[Amiyane] always the same, chant it"
He wasn't sure exactly what "amiyane" meant. He believes it is a Persian based word, possibly some Turkish hacker slang he isn't familiar with.
91![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:39:09am |
re: #87 lawhawk
Well, it is more entertaining than Beck. And mind you that we're discussing Beck via Jon Stewart. Jon frakkin Stewart. On Comedy Central.
What's wrong with "Jon 'frakkin' Stewart" I don't watch that much media, but I don't rember any other news channel bringing to light just how horrible those Hamas Cartoons were...
92![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:39:27am |
re: #83 Obdicut
In my experience, most Turkish-based hacks have something to do with arguments about the Armenian genocide, or lack thereof.
Google this phrase "Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane" It seems to have been used a number of times around a number of sites. Don't know what it means.
93![]() |
webevintage Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:39:32am |
re: #34 Soap_Man
The 5 Most Badass Presidents of All-TimeUnsurprisingly, Teddy is ranked #1.
Jackson:
When the 1828 election rolled around, a lot of people were terrified when they heard Andrew "Old Hickory" Jackson was running. If you're wondering how a guy we're calling a bad ass got such a lame nickname, it's because he used to carry a hickory cane around and beat people senseless with it, and if you're wondering why he did that, it's because he was a fucking lunatic.
hahahaha
Though I have always admired Jackson for the way he stood up to people who would besmirch his wife's name.
Loyalty is sexy in a man.
I love the idea of Obama carrying one of those little collapsible Ben Linus sticks. No one expects the nerdy guy.
94![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:40:33am |
re: #90 drcordell
Amiyane means 'colloquial'. So they are talking about always the same colloquial chant.
95![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:41:55am |
I was not familiar with unnecessary innuendo. Always the same chant bi Amiyane expression.
96![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:42:13am |
97![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:42:19am |
re: #89 Bagua
Typical lies and distortions that are unsubstantiated and spewed by an evil person.
Scum to be precise.
98![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:42:28am |
re: #85 LudwigVanQuixote
Upding, but just because I'm understanding and sympathetic.
99![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:42:33am |
re: #91 jamesfirecat
That's not meant as an attack on Stewart as it is of the rest of the media. Where's the rest of the media to provide actual news and analysis. Instead, we're left with Comedy Central's Jon Stewart to ridicule Beck's insanities?
This isn't the first time Stewart has handled news items that the rest of the media has simply ignored. It's little wonder that more people check out his show for news than actual news outlets. It's also more than a little sad that it's come to that.
100![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:44:17am |
re: #90 drcordell
My coworker's translation was similar:
Aşina değildim lüzumsuz kinaye
"I was not familiar with your unnecessary expression (or reference, allusion)"Amiyane bi tabir hep ayni terane
"[Amiyane] always the same, chant it"He wasn't sure exactly what "amiyane" meant. He believes it is a Persian based word, possibly some Turkish hacker slang he isn't familiar with.
Maybe from a song...
:My sincere feelings in my head, man, unfortunately I on individual in the doldrums.
I was not familiar with unnecessary innuendo, an expression amiyane same chant.
Not to rub together two lira in my pocket, I inatlaş with life after my dream.
Then allow a dignified expression, dervish-i vine Laedri pseudonym ... "
[Link: www.atauniv.com...]
101![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:44:39am |
re: #99 lawhawk
That's not meant as an attack on Stewart as it is of the rest of the media. Where's the rest of the media to provide actual news and analysis. Instead, we're left with Comedy Central's Jon Stewart to ridicule Beck's insanities?
This isn't the first time Stewart has handled news items that the rest of the media has simply ignored. It's little wonder that more people check out his show for news than actual news outlets. It's also more than a little sad that it's come to that.
Its more like a lot sad if you ask me, but apparently these days its not news to call a loon a loon so instead if you want to talk about them realistically (and give them the mock them you need to do it from a "comedy" show...
102![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:44:40am |
re: #97 LudwigVanQuixote
Typical lies and distortions that are unsubstantiated and spewed by an evil person.
Scum to be precise.
You are a disturbed individual.
103![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:44:51am |
re: #97 LudwigVanQuixote
Typical lies and distortions that are unsubstantiated and spewed by an evil person.
Scum to be precise.
maybe his pockets, like those of Bush, Beck, and Robertson, are lined with blood from African gold.
104![]() |
webevintage Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:44:55am |
Most Badass Quote:
"I have only two regrets: I didn't shoot Henry Clay and I didn't hang John C. Calhoun."
That's right. In a life rich with murdering people for little-to-no reason, Jackson's only regret was that he didn't kill quite enough people. People like Calhoun who, it should be noted, was Jackson's vice president.
105![]() |
SixDegrees Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:45:21am |
re: #99 lawhawk
That's not meant as an attack on Stewart as it is of the rest of the media. Where's the rest of the media to provide actual news and analysis. Instead, we're left with Comedy Central's Jon Stewart to ridicule Beck's insanities?
This isn't the first time Stewart has handled news items that the rest of the media has simply ignored. It's little wonder that more people check out his show for news than actual news outlets. It's also more than a little sad that it's come to that.
The rest of the media is keeping their powder dry until closer to the elections, when it will make more sense to deploy.
106![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:45:28am |
re: #85 LudwigVanQuixote
By suddenly describing, soft euphemisms and relativism as the "high road" we have been castrated as a culture when it comes to confronting real evils.
Darth Vader was misunderstood. See it from his point of view, it is just as valid as yours...
Charles Manson wasn't breast fed, it is not his fault.
Don't call evil evil, because it hurts the feelings of evil people
Yes, this is a big problem we have these days.
107![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:46:09am |
re: #100 Walter L. Newton
Maybe from a song...
:My sincere feelings in my head, man, unfortunately I on individual in the doldrums.
I was not familiar with unnecessary innuendo, an expression amiyane same chant.
Not to rub together two lira in my pocket, I inatlaş with life after my dream.
Then allow a dignified expression, dervish-i vine Laedri pseudonym ... "[Link: www.atauniv.com...]
Album Blockade Alarm by Süveyda
108![]() |
garhighway Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:46:30am |
re: #85 LudwigVanQuixote
Charles Manson wasn't breast fed, it is not his fault.
Who, exactly, are you quoting?
109![]() |
Jaerik Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:47:39am |
The "liberal" and "conservative" labels stopped making sense once wedge issues were drawn out of a hat to form platforms that aren't internally consistent, but drive votes.
Seriously, why is it that in America, if I know your stance on gun ownership, I also know your stance on abortion, the death penalty, global warming, tax policy, health care, etc?
That makes no sense. The arguments do not follow from one another in any way without tortuously circuitous back-reasoning. Yet for some reason, one arbitrary group of disconnected beliefs is "liberal", and one is "conservative." It's maddening.
110![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:48:14am |
re: #97 LudwigVanQuixote
Typical lies and distortions that are unsubstantiated and spewed by an evil person.
Scum to be precise.
Why do you attack me on a thread in which I have said nothing to you? What is your problem?
111![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:48:16am |
re: #53 Cato the Elder
Looks like a tag line for the hacker GHoST61.
112![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:48:24am |
re: #105 SixDegrees
The rest of the media is keeping their powder dry until closer to the elections, when it will make more sense to deploy.
I respond with a profound "meh" the rest of the media should be calling out this kind of crazy every time it happens wherever and whenever it happens.
The problem to me is that in the media no longer wants to actually give us "news" they no longer want to tell us facts and who is right and who is wrong. Thus they make things like global warming seem to be a reasonable debate when it isn't...
113![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:48:48am |
re: #103 Guanxi88
maybe his pockets, like those of Bush, Beck, and Robertson, are lined with blood from African gold.
So let's look at the nature of what you just said.
You managed to bring wholesale mass murder of innocent people into a personal jibe on a blog.
So is it that their lives didn't count because they were poor?
Is it that they do not deserve the dignity of treating their murder with the horror it deserves because rich white American conservatives financed the murder?
Or is it just because you think that dead black babies deserve the level of respect you just gave them?
You really just crossed the line into scum.
114![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:48:53am |
re: #110 Bagua
Why do you attack me on a thread in which I have said nothing to you? What is your problem?
You're evil, you see, and he's against evil. It's all perfectly clear.
115![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:49:25am |
re: #110 Bagua
Why do you attack me on a thread in which I have said nothing to you?...
Because he can.
116![]() |
Racer X Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:50:02am |
117![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:50:10am |
re: #108 garhighway
Who, exactly, are you quoting?
No one in particular.
It just was a semi-humorous phrase to make a valid point.
We have all heard the mantra that thus and such monster could not help his crimes because of the woes of society as if he had no free will.
118![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:50:29am |
re: #114 Guanxi88
You're evil, you see, and he's against evil. It's all perfectly clear.
It's weird. I said nothing to him. Now I believe he just called you scum as well.
119![]() |
That's Glenn Beck to you Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:50:40am |
Ohhh. I get it.
I'm kinda slow (I guess I am progressive that way) but I get it.
The whole bearded lady thing is supposed to scare us into thinking that we need progressives to protect us from ... Capitalism!
Well let me point something out - you won't see any real conservative women wearing beards. Nooo. That would be a signe of evolution - and there is no evolution except the kind that is just intellectuals in slow motion Revolution.
No - conservative women in beards aren't really conservatives at all. They aren't really Republicans. And they aren't funny - they are the real threat.
They are FIRINOs - Follicularly Impaired Republicans In Name Only!
120![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:51:56am |
re: #110 Bagua
Why do you attack me on a thread in which I have said nothing to you? What is your problem?
Ahh mealy mouthed Bagua strikes again.
So if you were not calling my post hysterical hyperbole, than which were you referring to?
It would be one thing if you just came out to fight. It's another when you so brazenly and clumsily lie about it.
121![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:52:32am |
re: #115 Walter L. Newton
Because he can.
Ahh Walter finally feeling like you have enough buddies to join a pile on. How brave.
122![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:52:40am |
re: #117 LudwigVanQuixote
..snip...
We have all heard the mantra that thus and such monster could not help his crimes because of the woes of society as if he had no free will.
He's depraved because he's deprived. (1956?0
123![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:53:05am |
re: #120 LudwigVanQuixote
I was referring to Glenn Beck, the subject of the post. Not you.
124![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:53:31am |
re: #113 LudwigVanQuixote
So let's look at the nature of what you just said.
You managed to bring wholesale mass murder of innocent people into a personal jibe on a blog.
So is it that their lives didn't count because they were poor?
Is it that they do not deserve the dignity of treating their murder with the horror it deserves because rich white American conservatives financed the murder?
Or is it just because you think that dead black babies deserve the level of respect you just gave them?
You really just crossed the line into scum.
I suggested that perhaps he was merely one of those whose pockets, like those of the unholy and evil trinity you cited last thread, were lined with blood from African gold. You know, one of those EVIL people you're always carrying on about.
Little did I know that quoting the Sage would in this way reveal my own evil and racist nature, the last bit, though, was known to you already.
That a deranged and spiteful bigot things so little of me is of no consequence whatsoever.
You scour the world and the hearts of folk online for evil, when you could find it far, far closer to home.
125![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:55:26am |
re: #123 Bagua
I was referring to Glenn Beck, the subject of the post. Not you.
Then I apologize.
So much of what you say is directed at me and you say such things about what I wrote so often that I assumed incorrectly.
Yes Glen Beck is hysterical hyperbole.
126![]() |
garhighway Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:55:27am |
re: #117 LudwigVanQuixote
No one in particular.
It just was a semi-humorous phrase to make a valid point.
In other words, you made it up.
OK.
127![]() |
SanFranciscoZionist Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:56:11am |
re: #4 Walter L. Newton
You're not seriously asking that question, are you?
You know, we're talking here about a man who dressed up in an East German officer's uniform on purpose for the cover of his own book. If he named his chalk caddies after Thomas Paine, would it be THAT weird?
128![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:56:12am |
re: #121 LudwigVanQuixote
Ahh Walter finally feeling like you have enough buddies to join a pile on. How brave.
Whatever. Carry on...
129![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:56:23am |
re: #120 LudwigVanQuixote
Ludwig, he might have been referring to Beck. It's certainly a possible interpretation.
130![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:57:42am |
re: #127 SanFranciscoZionist
You know, we're talking here about a man who dressed up in an East German officer's uniform on purpose for the cover of his own book. If he named his chalk caddies after Thomas Paine, would it be THAT weird?
You're probably right.
131![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:57:47am |
re: #111 lawhawk
Looks like a tag line for the hacker GHoST61.
Seriously? This guy goes around and leaves a couple of lines from a Turkish song on random websites?
And I thought I knew how to waste time.
132![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:58:08am |
re: #124 Guanxi88
No you were sniping. You've been doing so for several days and I have been patient.
But the fact is that you really don't care that those villages were mudered at all. It is more noble to make snide remarks on a blog about their deaths.
Their suffering and murder does not matter nearly as much as a chance to snipe at little old me.
It shows exactly where your priorities are. It shows exactly the level of respect for the murdered you have and it makes you into a racist scumbag.
So really, are dead black babies funny to you?
Or is it that you just don't think they bear thinking about before opening your mouth because they were black?
133![]() |
jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:58:25am |
134![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:58:42am |
re: #129 Obdicut
Ludwig, he might have been referring to Beck. It's certainly a possible interpretation.
See above that is what he said he meant and I apologized.
135![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 11:59:15am |
re: #132 LudwigVanQuixote
No you were sniping. You've been doing so for several days and I have been patient.
But the fact is that you really don't care that those villages were mudered at all. It is more noble to make snide remarks on a blog about their deaths.
Their suffering and murder does not matter nearly as much as a chance to snipe at little old me.
It shows exactly where your priorities are. It shows exactly the level of respect for the murdered you have and it makes you into a racist scumbag.
So really, are dead black babies funny to you?
Or is it that you just don't think they bear thinking about before opening your mouth because they were black?
Okay then - tell me how murdered babies in Africa are providing gold to Beck, Robertson, and Bush, because I gotta tell ya, the thing just sounds like hysterical hyperbole.
136![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:00:29pm |
re: #132 LudwigVanQuixote
Or is it that you just don't think they bear thinking about before opening your mouth because they were black?
And as for that, I thought you'd already established to the satisfaction of the only authority you recognize - your own over-weening sense of justice and rectitude - that I was certainly a racist long ago?
137![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:00:44pm |
re: #126 garhighway
Yes, I do indeed write my own material... What's your beef?
The Darth Vader line was in the same vein. Most people got the point I should think.
138![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:01:42pm |
re: #117 LudwigVanQuixote
No one in particular.
It just was a semi-humorous phrase to make a valid point.
We have all heard the mantra that thus and such monster could not help his crimes because of the woes of society as if he had no free will.
Worse, these days everyone's faults are a condition. I have such-and-such psychological issue - that's why I did that. I need drugs to help me with my such-and-such
139![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:03:12pm |
re: #135 Guanxi88
Okay then - tell me how murdered babies in Africa are providing gold to Beck, Robertson, and Bush, because I gotta tell ya, the thing just sounds like hysterical hyperbole.
Well dipshit, there was a whole thread here about that. Ever here of Taylor?
Ever hear of Freedom Gold?
Oh wait you were even on that thread. So yes, you had to have heard of this...
Hmmm...
So is it that you have selective memory, or is it that dead black babies don't rate being remembered with you?
You tell me. I'll see to it that your sheets are pressed so you look dashing at the cross burning.
140![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:03:35pm |
re: #135 Guanxi88
Okay then - tell me how murdered babies in Africa are providing gold to Beck, Robertson, and Bush, because I gotta tell ya, the thing just sounds like hysterical hyperbole.
Because ex-president of Libera was killing his own people and Pat Robertson was in financial cahoots with him and getting him positive access to the White House, so Robertson helped kill those black Africans.
141![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:04:27pm |
re: #140 Walter L. Newton
Because ex-president of Libera was killing his own people and Pat Robertson was in financial cahoots with him and getting him positive access to the White House, so Robertson helped kill those black Africans.
I probably didn't explain that was well as Ludwig would/could, but I think that's the gist of it.
142![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:04:28pm |
re: #140 Walter L. Newton
Because ex-president of Libera was killing his own people and Pat Robertson was in financial cahoots with him and getting him positive access to the White House, so Robertson helped kill those black Africans.
Walter, you just gained respect with me.
143![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:05:38pm |
re: #141 Walter L. Newton
I probably didn't explain that was well as Ludwig would/could, but I think that's the gist of it.
NO that was pretty much dead on. You needed to add the part about the Freedom Gold corporation that was the reason for that access and the way that Robertson profited, and you need to point out how beck pimps gold, but that is about right.
144![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:05:43pm |
re: #139 LudwigVanQuixote
Well dipshit, there was a whole thread here about that. Ever here of Taylor?
Ever hear of Freedom Gold?
Oh wait you were even on that thread. So yes, you had to have heard of this...
Hmmm...
So is it that you have selective memory, or is it that dead black babies don't rate being remembered with you?
You tell me. I'll see to it that your sheets are pressed so you look dashing at the cross burning.
Got it. Charles Taylor's funding Beck and Bush and such. All perfectly clear. A perfect storm of evil, indeed.
Freedom Gold never mined an ounce. How'd they get the gold, then?
And as for the Klan crack, it's perfectly in accord with the ravings of a severely troubled mind. I'd suggest you get help.
146![]() |
lawhawk Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:06:07pm |
re: #131 Cato the Elder
Indeed - and apparently keeps score.
147![]() |
solomonpanting Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:06:38pm |
re: #123 BaguaI was referring to Glenn Beck, the subject of the post. Not you.
Then I apologize.
You're so vain
I bet you think this thread is about
148![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:06:48pm |
re: #143 LudwigVanQuixote
NO that was pretty much dead on. You needed to add the part about the Freedom Gold corporation that was the reason for that access and the way that Robertson profited, and you need to point out how beck pimps gold, but that is about right.
They mined no gold, did they?
149![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:07:52pm |
Ludwig - Freedom Gold never went into production: How'd they get the money to fund Beck, Bush, and Robertson?
150![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:09:16pm |
151![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:09:57pm |
re: #146 lawhawk
Indeed - and apparently keeps score.
Just putting "GHoST61" into Google turns up ca. 5,200 hits.
There seems to be no telling whether or not he just defaces or does more serious damage. I'm going to recommend my friends have their site/server checked out by a security expert.
152![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:11:07pm |
re: #151 Cato the Elder
Just putting "GHoST61" into Google turns up ca. 5,200 hits.
There seems to be no telling whether or not he just defaces or does more serious damage. I'm going to recommend my friends have their site/server checked out by a security expert.
Don't waste your time, call Ghostbusters.
153![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:11:28pm |
re: #143 LudwigVanQuixote
NO that was pretty much dead on. You needed to add the part about the Freedom Gold corporation that was the reason for that access and the way that Robertson profited, and you need to point out how beck pimps gold, but that is about right.
Freedom Gold never went into production. Aside from that one detail, the fact that there is NO gold from the deal, it's great story.
154![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:12:12pm |
re: #149 Guanxi88
Ohh so you have heard the story...
So then why did you lie about not knowing about it?
You've heard it enough to quibble on the details.
What I said was:
You needed to add the part about the Freedom Gold corporation that was the reason for that access and the way that Robertson profited
,
As in that was the whole financial angle of and reason for the arrangement.
Whether or not Robertson and Bush's pet dictator stayed in power long enough for Freedom Gold to profit is not the point or even a point.
What is a point is that you truly are racist filth and you are caught in a lie.
So seriously fuck you.
155![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:15:05pm |
re: #153 Guanxi88
Freedom Gold never went into production. Aside from that one detail, the fact that there is NO gold from the deal, it's great story.
That is not the point. Taylor gave Robertson concessions to help him set up a gold mining corporation in return for possible access to the White House, which Robertson did try to arrange, and Robertson also spoke out against the Bush government when they asked Taylor to step down.
Whether gold was produced has nothing to do with the arrangements and access that Robertson was offering to a homicidal dictator.
That's fact.
156![]() |
Residence: Hopeandchangeistan 2012 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:15:06pm |
Walter - in the Stephen King book (Under the Dome) he referred to "The Hunted Ones, a clever Lost sequel"
158![]() |
simoom Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:15:20pm |
re: #9 teleskiguy
Glenn Beck is a raving freakazoid nut sandwich! Charles, thank you for this video. Still cracks me up!
[Video]
We can add barking rabid dog imitator to raving freakazoid nut sandwich :P
159![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:16:12pm |
re: #149 Guanxi88
Ludwig - Freedom Gold never went into production: How'd they get the money to fund Beck, Bush, and Robertson?
[Link: rfmcdpei.livejournal.com...]
160![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:16:14pm |
re: #155 Walter L. Newton
That is not the point. Taylor gave Robertson concessions to help him set up a gold mining corporation in return for possible access to the White House, which Robertson did try to arrange, and Robertson also spoke out against the Bush government when they asked Taylor to step down.
Whether gold was produced has nothing to do with the arrangements and access that Robertson was offering to a homicidal dictator.
That's fact.
Again I am impressed. Perhaps I have misread you.
161![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:17:13pm |
re: #156 Stanley Sea
Walter - in the Stephen King book (Under the Dome) he referred to "The Hunted Ones, a clever Lost sequel"
[Link: lostpedia.wikia.com...]
The Hunted Ones is a fictitious sequel to Lost mentioned in Stephen King's 2009 novel Under the Dome.
162![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:17:32pm |
re: #154 LudwigVanQuixote
Ohh so you have heard the story...
So then why did you lie about not knowing about it?
You've heard it enough to quibble on the details.
What I said was:
,
As in that was the whole financial angle of and reason for the arrangement.
Whether or not Robertson and Bush's pet dictator stayed in power long enough for Freedom Gold to profit is not the point or even a point.
What is a point is that you truly are racist filth and you are caught in a lie.
So seriously fuck you.
I had to pull it up and see what was going on with the line - cause it was too pricelessly absurd to be true as reported by you.
You said their pockets were lined with blood, and that Robertson profited from it. Now you say whether they profited or not doesn't matter. Now, which is it, O defender of justice? Did Beck get African blood in his pockets or didn't he?
The point is you are a deranged and fiercely bitter person; anyone disagreeing with you is presumptively evil - all that remains for you is to determine the nature of their evil.
Most likely, you're borderline paranoid (with delusions of reference, eg "hysterical hyperbole"), laboring under delusions of adequacy, and, in short, damned near perfectly ill.
163![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:17:53pm |
re: #157 cliffster
Racist filth, LVQ?
Yes actually, he is belittling in many ways the murder of innocent men women and children. He is now trying to pretend there is no story there.
Since those men women and children were black and he really does not get the point of how they were exploited or who was doing the exploiting and is in fact defending it, he is racist filth.
164![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:18:09pm |
re: #155 Walter L. Newton
That is not the point. Taylor gave Robertson concessions to help him set up a gold mining corporation in return for possible access to the White House, which Robertson did try to arrange, and Robertson also spoke out against the Bush government when they asked Taylor to step down.
Whether gold was produced has nothing to do with the arrangements and access that Robertson was offering to a homicidal dictator.
That's fact.
So, then, it might not be accurate to suggest that Bush, Beck, and Robertson's pockets were bloodstained from African gold?
165![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:18:48pm |
re: #157 cliffster
Racist filth, LVQ?
'Course I'm racist filth - I take issue with the Oracle. What else could I be?
166![]() |
Darth Vader Gargoyle Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:18:56pm |
re: #154 LudwigVanQuixote
Ohh so you have heard the story...
So then why did you lie about not knowing about it?
You've heard it enough to quibble on the details.
What I said was:
,As in that was the whole financial angle of and reason for the arrangement.
Whether or not Robertson and Bush's pet dictator stayed in power long enough for Freedom Gold to profit is not the point or even a point.
What is a point is that you truly are racist filth and you are caught in a lie.
So seriously fuck you.
You forgot evil.
167![]() |
Vambo Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:19:40pm |
"evil" only exists when you declare something to be evil.
that said, I do agree with LVQ, but it's more about calling a spade a spade than hunting Satan.
Charles Manson killed people, whatever his emotional problems (and there were many) he deserves to be punished.
etc.
etc.
168![]() |
Darth Vader Gargoyle Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:20:05pm |
re: #163 LudwigVanQuixote
Yes actually, he is belittling in many ways the murder of innocent men women and children. He is now trying to pretend there is no story there.
Since those men women and children were black and he really does not get the point of how they were exploited or who was doing the exploiting and is in fact defending it, he is racist filth.
Like you belittled the thousands of pretend people Vader sent to their deaths...
Geeze, lighten up a little...
171![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:22:16pm |
re: #164 Guanxi88
So, then, it might not be accurate to suggest that Bush, Beck, and Robertson's pockets were bloodstained from African gold?
I understand the technical quibble you are making. It is a great way to avoid that these people openly dealt with a homicidal dictator to line their pockets. Pardon me for seeing trying to do it and hence enabling the murder in the hopes of profit as just as bad as seeing those profits after the damage was done.
BUt of course that is not the whole story. Do you think that Freedom gold was the only gold venture Robertson was involved in in Africa or that the one's Beck pushes are innocent as well?
Yet you quibble for these monsters like a cheap ambulance chasing attorney.
So really, why do dead black people not matter to you?
Why is that not the main point?
Could it be because dead black people don't make your radar?
And if so, does that not conclusively make you into racist scum?
172![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:23:23pm |
re: #164 Guanxi88
So, then, it might not be accurate to suggest that Bush, Beck, and Robertson's pockets were bloodstained from African gold?
To be honest, I don't under the Bush and Beck reference, but, Robertson certainly decided to do business with a homicidal dictator and help his image with the White House. There was no shortage of factual information about Taylor at the time, but Robertson ignore all the evidence in order to open up the possibilities of financial gain.
Yes, Robertson was another crony that supported the ego and machinations of a murderer.
Robertson was very impress with Taylor...
"Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson accused President Bush of “undermining a Christian, Baptist president to bring in Muslim rebels” by asking Liberian President Charles Taylor, recently indicted for war crimes, to step down.
“How dare the president of the United States say to the duly elected president of another country, 'You've got to step down,'" Robertson said Monday on “The 700 Club,” broadcast from his Christian Broadcasting Network.
“It's one thing to say, we will give you money if you step down and we will give you troops if you step down, but just to order him to step down? He doesn't work for us.”
Robertson, a Bush supporter who has financial interests in Liberia, said he believes the State Department has “mismanaged the situation in nation after nation after nation” in Africa.
“So we're undermining a Christian, Baptist president to bring in Muslim rebels to take over the country,” he said in the broadcast."
173![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:23:51pm |
re: #167 Vambo
"evil" only exists when you declare something to be evil.
that said, I do agree with LVQ, but it's more about calling a spade a spade than hunting Satan.
Charles Manson killed people, whatever his emotional problems (and there were many) he deserves to be punished.etc.
etc.
To be honest with you I am absolutely not talking about this in terms of Satan.
Jewish theology is quite clear that men are perfectly capable of being evil on their own without invoking Satan.
I am much more about calling things truthfully for once.
174![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:25:35pm |
re: #171 LudwigVanQuixote
I understand the technical quibble you are making. It is a great way to avoid that these people openly dealt with a homicidal dictator to line their pockets. Pardon me for seeing trying to do it and hence enabling the murder in the hopes of profit as just as bad as seeing those profits after the damage was done.
BUt of course that is not the whole story. Do you think that Freedom gold was the only gold venture Robertson was involved in in Africa or that the one's Beck pushes are innocent as well?
Yet you quibble for these monsters like a cheap ambulance chasing attorney.
So really, why do dead black people not matter to you?
Why is that not the main point?
Could it be because dead black people don't make your radar?
And if so, does that not conclusively make you into racist scum?
Quibbling? Not at all, Merely trying to hunt down the truth behind the - now demonstrably - false claim that Bush, Beck, and Robertson's pockets are blood lined as a result of the murder of innocents in Africa.
If you had evidence that Beck was pushing a company that sold gold sourced in a similary despicable manner, you'd certainly bring it out. You don't, but the slur will do just fine.
Dead black people are not a debating point with me, Ludwig - I don't presume to use the bodies of the dead as clubs in personal psycho-dramas. I leave that to others, with more experience.
175![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:25:52pm |
re: #168 rwdflynavy
Like you belittled the thousands of pretend people Vader sent to their deaths...
Geeze, lighten up a little...
Ummm sort of the difference their for the clueless... pretend people as opposed to real people... I chose the metaphor carefully for that reason.
Then ther is the point that I consider such behavior evil, while Guaxni Klan dragon here doesn't seem to mind if it is directed at black folks.
176![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:26:07pm |
re: #163 LudwigVanQuixote
Yes actually, he is belittling in many ways the murder of innocent men women and children. He is now trying to pretend there is no story there.
Since those men women and children were black and he really does not get the point of how they were exploited or who was doing the exploiting and is in fact defending it, he is racist filth.
Perhaps you think he is "misguided", or that he "doesn't pay attention to important details". Calling him racist filth is absurd, and you know it.
177![]() |
RogueOne Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:26:15pm |
re: #172 Walter L. Newton
I was with him on the Robertson bashing because he deserves all the heaping scorn we can put on him. Trying to make a quick buck through exploiting slave labor and civil war is reprehensible. Turning it into a partisan issue by somehow trying to link Bush to the situation turned it into partisan screed rather than reality.
178![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:26:33pm |
re: #172 Walter L. Newton
To be honest, I don't under the Bush and Beck reference, but, Robertson certainly decided to do business with a homicidal dictator and help his image with the White House. There was no shortage of factual information about Taylor at the time, but Robertson ignore all the evidence in order to open up the possibilities of financial gain.
Yes, Robertson was another crony that supported the ego and machinations of a murderer.
Robertson was very impress with Taylor...
"Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson accused President Bush of “undermining a Christian, Baptist president to bring in Muslim rebels” by asking Liberian President Charles Taylor, recently indicted for war crimes, to step down.
“How dare the president of the United States say to the duly elected president of another country, 'You've got to step down,'" Robertson said Monday on “The 700 Club,” broadcast from his Christian Broadcasting Network.
“It's one thing to say, we will give you money if you step down and we will give you troops if you step down, but just to order him to step down? He doesn't work for us.”
Robertson, a Bush supporter who has financial interests in Liberia, said he believes the State Department has “mismanaged the situation in nation after nation after nation” in Africa.
“So we're undermining a Christian, Baptist president to bring in Muslim rebels to take over the country,” he said in the broadcast."
My take on it was Robertson was involved, fucked up mightily, and lost some money to boot.
179![]() |
Vambo Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:26:38pm |
re: #173 LudwigVanQuixote
To be honest with you I am absolutely not talking about this in terms of Satan.
Jewish theology is quite clear that men are perfectly capable of being evil on their own without invoking Satan.
I am much more about calling things truthfully for once.
I'd rather just call those people sociopaths and abandon religious terminology altogether. But I don't really care either way. Call Fred Phelps or some other gay-basher evil, I'm not going to make a stink.
180![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:26:41pm |
re: #173 LudwigVanQuixote
To be honest with you I am absolutely not talking about this in terms of Satan.
Jewish theology is quite clear that men are perfectly capable of being evil on their own without invoking Satan.
I am much more about calling things truthfully for once.
A paragraph from my play "High Crimes and Misdemeanors"
"Your life is worthy of your fullest investment. Before you can take control of your life you must understand that your are not irrelevant. The question of good and evil is not unrelated. I cannot see God, but I know he is still in residence because his servant is busy in the house. Satan is his first and foremost angel, he is the necessary friction that enables the universe to move. The fact that you came to me and sought out someone to approve of your suicide leaves me with the impression that living authentically with the meaninglessness of your life is impossible. You are a failed Nihilist."
181![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:27:00pm |
re: #176 cliffster
Perhaps you think he is "misguided", or that he "doesn't pay attention to important details". Calling him racist filth is absurd, and you know it.
NO he is fighting to hard for that charitable an account.
182![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:28:54pm |
re: #177 RogueOne
I was with him on the Robertson bashing because he deserves all the heaping scorn we can put on him. Trying to make a quick buck through exploiting slave labor and civil war is reprehensible. Turning it into a partisan issue by somehow trying to link Bush to the situation turned it into partisan screed rather than reality.
Like I said, I don't understand the Bush/Beck connection. If it has something to do with Goldline or companies like that, well, that's a little silly, since many talk shows right or left, sponsor Goldline. And not all gold comes from Africa. A lot of gold is old gold, a lot of gold investments are on paper only.
183![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:29:15pm |
re: #176 cliffster
Perhaps you think he is "misguided", or that he "doesn't pay attention to important details". Calling him racist filth is absurd, and you know it.
re: #181 LudwigVanQuixote
NO he is fighting to hard for that charitable an account.
Exactly - were I to make obeisance to the Great One, Who will almost certainly be thanked by my grandchildren and great-grandchildren's children for his tireless efforts to save billions of lives from EVIL men such as I, then I'm sure that I'd be welcomed back in. Stiff-necked as I am, I refuse correction from this little tin godling, and so remain out of favor with him.
184![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:29:35pm |
re: #179 Vambo
I'd rather just call those people sociopaths and abandon religious terminology altogether. But I don't really care either way. Call Fred Phelps or some other gay-basher evil, I'm not going to make a stink.
I here your point and I understand the place it is coming from. But evil is a very well understood word. Nothing else carries that weight, and somethings deserve that weight.
Yes Hitler was a sociopath, but that really does not come near as close to the truth as saying he was evil.
Yes rape and pillage of African villages for gold money is sociopathic, opportunistic and exploitive.
But it is not near enough to the truth as just calling it evil.
185![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:30:36pm |
re: #181 LudwigVanQuixote
NO he is fighting to hard for that charitable an account.
YOU try too hard to find a reason to put a harsh label on people. Think of it like this.. there are really bad people in the world. If you take all these people you disagree with, and lump them into that "very bad" category, it kind of waters down the category. Me, I'd prefer to leave the word "evil" for people who truly are evil. You're just giving them a break by putting them in the same ring as the average Joe out there.
186![]() |
Decatur Deb Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:31:01pm |
re: #175 LudwigVanQuixote
You're losing me LVQ. Let's save the Klan shtick for the guys down on Rt. 84.
187![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:31:31pm |
re: #186 Decatur Deb
You're losing me LVQ. Let's save the Klan shtick for the guys down on Rt. 84.
The target doesn't matter. This we knew from long ago.
188![]() |
RogueOne Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:31:38pm |
re: #185 cliffster
Me, I'd prefer to leave the word "evil" for people who truly are evil.
Celine Dion
189![]() |
ShaunP Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:32:26pm |
190![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:33:24pm |
re: #188 RogueOne
Celine Dion
Definitely evil. I sat through a whole show. The only decent song was Titanic.
191![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:33:35pm |
re: #160 LudwigVanQuixote
Again I am impressed. Perhaps I have misread you.
You have misread me... all the time. But your opinion of me doesn't mean anything at all. You change opinions and alliances as quickly as I change my dirty socks. It's extremely transparent.
192![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:34:15pm |
193![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:34:56pm |
re: #183 Guanxi88
No you refuse to acknowledge that:
1. You made a joke about murdered black people in an attempt to snipe at me.
2. Pretended that there was no such story as the one I was referring to.
3. Then showed that you lied about that and dug yourself a hole by trying to defend Robertson, Beck and Bush - whose actions were evil.
4. For the record, Beck and the pimping of gold is the connection. The entire gold trade is awash in blood. It is not hard to splatter some on him. But the connections between Beck, Fox and Robertson are too well established for this not to all be part of the same thing.
However, I am talking about racist, delusional asshole you.
You would rather quibble about diversions than the main point about trying to get gold profits from homicidal dictators.
The fact that the murders involved are not something you care about, or have yet to care about are what makes you into racist filth.
The fact that you think AGW = Al Gore and that you ignore the entire rest of the scientific world and all of the data and evidence when you say such stupid things merely makes you stupid as well.
So in short, I am not calling you a racist stupid bit of filth.
I have proved you are such.
194![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:35:18pm |
re: #191 Walter L. Newton
No, whatever charges can be made against Ludwig, inconsistency is not one of them.
195![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:35:39pm |
re: #188 RogueOne
Celine Dion
Are we now equating lack of talent with evil. Hell, Hitler wasn't a very good painter ("he had trouble with the borders") but that didn't make him... wait... you're right, Dion is evil.
196![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:37:18pm |
re: #194 Obdicut
No, whatever charges can be made against Ludwig, inconsistency is not one of them.
Sure... and his comment to me above was one of consistency... I got it... :)
197![]() |
MandyManners Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:37:45pm |
I see someone failed the Carnegie course again.
198![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:37:55pm |
re: #193 LudwigVanQuixote
And yet, he is not, as it turns out, a racist stupid bit of filth. Isn't that weird?
199![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:38:15pm |
re: #195 Walter L. Newton
Are we now equating lack of talent with evil. Hell, Hitler wasn't a very good painter ("he had trouble with the borders") but that didn't make him... wait... you're right, Dion is evil.
No Walter, you are being obtuse. Have you ever sat through one of her shows?
200![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:38:22pm |
re: #191 Walter L. Newton
You have misread me... all the time. But your opinion of me doesn't mean anything at all. You change opinions and alliances as quickly as I change my dirty socks. It's extremely transparent.
Well ok perhaps my first opinion was correct.
My allegiance is to the truth.
I was impressed that you were sticking up for the truth in this case.
I am very loyal to my friends Walter, but given that I never back down from sniping here, it should be really clear that I don't give a rats ass about what others think of me stating the truth as best I can.
I was however giving you the benefit of the doubt. I see I was mistaken.
201![]() |
RogueOne Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:39:56pm |
re: #197 MandyManners
I see someone failed the Carnegie course again.
I had a boss buy me that book long ago. The asshole said I had problems dealing with people.
202![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:40:31pm |
re: #201 RogueOne
I had a boss buy me that book long ago. The asshole said I had problems dealing with people.
Fuck that guy.
203![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:40:54pm |
re: #200 LudwigVanQuixote
Well ok perhaps my first opinion was correct.
My allegiance is to the truth.
I was impressed that you were sticking up for the truth in this case.
I am very loyal to my friends Walter, but given that I never back down from sniping here, it should be really clear that I don't give a rats ass about what others think of me stating the truth as best I can.
I was however giving you the benefit of the doubt. I see I was mistaken.
You made a mistake? You mean I didn't speak the truth, I wasn't sticking up for the truth about Taylor and Robertson and the connections to the murderous regime in Liberia.
You're confusing me again.
204![]() |
wrenchwench Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:41:10pm |
re: #197 MandyManners
I see someone failed the Carnegie course again.
You know, if he had titled it "How to Convince Everyone You Are Right About Everything" instead of "How to Win Friends and Influence People", he might have gotten more takers, especially among those who need it most, and it would be the same course.
205![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:41:59pm |
re: #193 LudwigVanQuixote
No you refuse to acknowledge that:
1. You made a joke about murdered black people in an attempt to snipe at me.
2. Pretended that there was no such story as the one I was referring to.
3. Then showed that you lied about that and dug yourself a hole by trying to defend Robertson, Beck and Bush - whose actions were evil.
4. For the record, Beck and the pimping of gold is the connection. The entire gold trade is awash in blood. It is not hard to splatter some on him. But the connections between Beck, Fox and Robertson are too well established for this not to all be part of the same thing.
However, I am talking about racist, delusional asshole you.
You would rather quibble about diversions than the main point about trying to get gold profits from homicidal dictators.
The fact that the murders involved are not something you care about, or have yet to care about are what makes you into racist filth.
The fact that you think AGW = Al Gore and that you ignore the entire rest of the scientific world and all of the data and evidence when you say such stupid things merely makes you stupid as well.
So in short, I am not calling you a racist stupid bit of filth.
I have proved you are such.
You delusional , raving man!
1) I made no joke about murdered black people. I suggested that perhaps this man was every bit as evil as those (Bush, Beck, and Robertson) whose pockets you claimed were bloodstained from African gold before you back-pedaled fully on the claim. Now, if the now demonstrable false claim isn't hysterical hyperbole in it's purest form...
2) In fact, there was no story at all that bore any resemblance to the claim that Bush, Beck, and Robertson profited from the murder of Africans.
3) How can I prove evil in defending actions that - by your own admission - never happened?
And frankly, LVQ, I do this for much the same reason that you invoke in your own rants and tirades - not to correct you, but rather to warn others away. They must not abandon perfectly sound beliefs merely because they are held by intemperate low-life bigots, like yourself. As I noted yesterday, even the lowest and most disreputable dive-bar on Skid Row would not long tolerate your un-ending stream of pointless abuse and invective.
The AGW bit is pointless, because you may recall that I am in agreement with the majority of scientific opinion on the matter - that it is a real phenomenon.
It is clear to me now that the claim of AGW denier, like the claim of racist, is merely one tool in your pitifully limited rhetorical bag of tricks.
206![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:42:08pm |
re: #203 Walter L. Newton
You made a mistake? You mean I didn't speak the truth, I wasn't sticking up for the truth about Taylor and Robertson and the connections to the murderous regime in Liberia.
You're confusing me again.
re: #200 LudwigVanQuixote
Well ok perhaps my first opinion was correct.
My allegiance is to the truth.
I was impressed that you were sticking up for the truth in this case.
I am very loyal to my friends Walter, but given that I never back down from sniping here, it should be really clear that I don't give a rats ass about what others think of me stating the truth as best I can.
I was however giving you the benefit of the doubt. I see I was mistaken.
Wow... really cyclic proof there of my point... "You change opinions and alliances as quickly as I change my dirty socks. It's extremely transparent."
That's for that.
LOL.
207![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:42:37pm |
re: #203 Walter L. Newton
I was impressed that you were sticking up for the truth in this case...
I had briefly thought that I had judged you to harshly in general. You cleared that up for me.
208![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:43:21pm |
re: #207 LudwigVanQuixote
I was impressed that you were sticking up for the truth in this case...
I had briefly thought that I had judged you to harshly in general. You cleared that up for me.
Amazing, isn't it? You thought you were wrong, but it turns out you were right?
Funny how that always seems to happen.
209![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:44:21pm |
re: #206 Walter L. Newton
Like going back into the pile ons... no doubt you didn't want to lose too much cred with your friends...
Too bad Walter, you gave me momentary hope that truth was more important to you than blog popularity.
I won't make the mistake again.
210![]() |
ShaunP Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:44:43pm |
Anyways...
I thought the revolution/evolution part of the video was hilarious...
211![]() |
RogueOne Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:45:18pm |
I think someone has missed their med schedule. Luckily today is National Pancake Day, maybe a couple of decent batches of pancakes will make it all better.
[Link: www.ihoppancakeday.com...]
212![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:46:06pm |
re: #207 LudwigVanQuixote
I was impressed that you were sticking up for the truth in this case...
I had briefly thought that I had judged you to harshly in general. You cleared that up for me.
You are so quick to think that people are evil, racist, or whatever. Judging from what we see here, one would conclude that you eventually hate everybody. I'm not trying to badger you, I'm just trying to point out that you are very quick to judge, and put insanely derogatory labels on people.
213![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:46:14pm |
re: #209 LudwigVanQuixote
Like going back into the pile ons... no doubt you didn't want to lose too much cred with your friends...
Too bad Walter, you gave me momentary hope that truth was more important to you than blog popularity.
I won't make the mistake again.
LOL.
214![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:46:29pm |
re: #208 Guanxi88
Amazing, isn't it? You thought you were wrong, but it turns out you were right?
Funny how that always seems to happen.
So Guaxni,
Were people murdered by Taylor?
Were Robertson's actions evil? IS the pimping of gold, knowing it comes from places like that evil?
Is sniping about the blood of the murdered to get at me appropriate?
If you can say that yes this shit is evil and stop defending it, and show some respect to the dead, I will withdraw my comment that you are racist filth.
If you can not, you prove that you are.
Pretty simple.
Your move.
215![]() |
SanFranciscoZionist Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:46:54pm |
re: #211 RogueOne
I think someone has missed their med schedule. Luckily today is National Pancake Day, maybe a couple of decent batches of pancakes will make it all better.
[Link: www.ihoppancakeday.com...]
Why is National Pancake Day a week after Mardi Gras?
216![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:47:34pm |
re: #212 cliffster
You are so quick to think that people are evil, racist, or whatever. Judging from what we see here, one would conclude that you eventually hate everybody. I'm not trying to badger you, I'm just trying to point out that you are very quick to judge, and put insanely derogatory labels on people.
My point exactly... Ludwig changes "... opinions and alliances as quickly as I change my dirty socks. It's extremely transparent."
217![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:48:35pm |
re: #212 cliffster
You are so quick to think that people are evil, racist, or whatever. Judging from what we see here, one would conclude that you eventually hate everybody. I'm not trying to badger you, I'm just trying to point out that you are very quick to judge, and put insanely derogatory labels on people.
It's interesting how the main post I made on this thread about people not being able to call evil evil is what is missed here.
Cliff, Taylor was a true monster. The deaths are real.
The gold trade that Beck pimps nightly is awash in evil monsters like him.
This is evil.
Call it evil.
And yes, I hate the ignorance that supports it.
That too is evil.
Evil has no messenger.
218![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:48:37pm |
re: #215 SanFranciscoZionist
Why is National Pancake Day a week after Mardi Gras?
It's one of those mysteries of the universe that inquiring minds demand an answer to.
219![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:48:44pm |
re: #214 LudwigVanQuixote
So Guaxni,
Were people murdered by Taylor?
Were Robertson's actions evil? IS the pimping of gold, knowing it comes from places like that evil?
Is sniping about the blood of the murdered to get at me appropriate?
If you can say that yes this shit is evil and stop defending it, and show some respect to the dead, I will withdraw my comment that you are racist filth.
If you can not, you prove that you are.
Pretty simple.
Your move.
What does Beck and Bush have to do with the Taylor/Robertson incident? You had a trio of evil doers in your comments above... Bush/Beck/Robertson?
220![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:51:18pm |
re: #219 Walter L. Newton
What does Beck and Bush have to do with the Taylor/Robertson incident? You had a trio of evil doers in your comments above... Bush/Beck/Robertson?
Well what is it that Beck pimps nightly?
Who was the President influenced by Robertson?
Yes eventually the US had to come out against Taylor... This was long after everyone else was forced to by reality.
Why did the US take so long if not as a bone to Robertson.
Now I will grant that it is possible that is all just coincidence. But I strongly doubt it.
221![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:51:42pm |
re: #217 LudwigVanQuixote
[snip]
The gold trade that Beck pimps nightly is awash in evil monsters like him.
[snip]
Really... Goldline is pimped on both liberal and conservative radio and TV talk and news shows all over the world.
And what do you know about the corporate structure of Goldline. You would be surprised who owns them and the connections they have in Chicago.
Do some homework before you spout off like that.
222![]() |
RogueOne Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:52:33pm |
re: #220 LudwigVanQuixote
Who was the President influenced by Robertson?
That's easy. Regarding Taylor, none of them.
223![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:53:04pm |
re: #217 LudwigVanQuixote
It's interesting how the main post I made on this thread about people not being able to call evil evil is what is missed here.
Cliff, Taylor was a true monster. The deaths are real.
The gold trade that Beck pimps nightly is awash in evil monsters like him.
This is evil.
Call it evil.
And yes, I hate the ignorance that supports it.
That too is evil.
Evil has no messenger.
You need to separate the face from the person. Perhaps you can say "the ignorance is evil". But the ignorant person is not evil. Guanxi88 is not evil, nor racist filth, and that is very clear. If you can overreact so grossly as to call him such when he clearly is not, then perhaps you could also overreact to climate data and assume that global warming is occurring when it is not. Think about it.
224![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:53:06pm |
re: #214 LudwigVanQuixote
So Guaxni,
Were people murdered by Taylor?
Were Robertson's actions evil? IS the pimping of gold, knowing it comes from places like that evil?
Is sniping about the blood of the murdered to get at me appropriate?
If you can say that yes this shit is evil and stop defending it, and show some respect to the dead, I will withdraw my comment that you are racist filth.
If you can not, you prove that you are.
Pretty simple.
Your move.
In order:
1) Who said Taylor didn't murder people? Certainly not me.
2) Was I suggesting Robertson's actions were appropriate? Not by any sane interpretation.
3) Was I sniping about the blood of the murdered, or merely invoking the hysterical ravings of you yourself to illustrate - not to you, for you are beyond hope - the sheer absurdity of your reflexive hatred of those who presume to disagree with you.
4) Ought we then to ban all gold, on the cautionary principle that it might come from Liberia and similar places? Great indeed is your nobility.
LVQ - I'm not defending evil - and you know it perfectly well. I'm disagreeing with you, and - because you're certain of the truth and justice of your own opinions and your manner of expression - you are unable to comprehend that a person might conceivably disagree in whole or in part with one or more of your own positions or you manner of expression without, however, embracing evil.
And I'll show you exactly as much respect as you deserve - you're a human being, a deeply troubled, brilliant human being. See, I don't think you're evil; I think you're in a dark and terrible place, and until you acknowledge that fact, you'll stay there.
Your move.
226![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:53:51pm |
re: #219 Walter L. Newton
What does Beck and Bush have to do with the Taylor/Robertson incident? You had a trio of evil doers in your comments above... Bush/Beck/Robertson?
Quoting the oracle himself, from the previous thread. Ask him about it.
227![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:57:34pm |
re: #219 Walter L. Newton
What does Beck and Bush have to do with the Taylor/Robertson incident? You had a trio of evil doers in your comments above... Bush/Beck/Robertson?
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
NO evil is evil It is better to call it what it is. That way it does not become respectable.
Consider the gold from Africa and the human cost of it. Consider the blood lining Beck and Robertson's and Bush's pockets from it.
That is evil.
Call it evil.
Do not dishonor or dehumanize the dead by making their murderers and those who enabled and financed their murders respectable.
228![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:57:53pm |
re: #224 Guanxi88
Enough.
Thank you for clarifying. I now have no doubts left about you.
Yes indeed, if the gold or diamonds you buy come from blood, you should not buy them.
I think that is really sufficient.
You are not the sort of racist filth who openly wants black people murdered by the score, you just think that is less important than the gold market.
OK so you are one who likes to profit from racism and evil, but you are not evil yourself...
Wait. I can't say that.
Why?
Because evil has no messenger.
You are racist scum. You are just too wrapped up in your own shit to see it.
229![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:58:04pm |
re: #226 Guanxi88
Quoting the oracle himself, from the previous thread. Ask him about it.
Gold is gold. The ring on your finger may have gold in it that was produced by the sweat (and maybe actual blood) of a African. Or it may be from melted down American coins from the last 150 years, or from bullion that has been sitting in vaults for 10 of years, whatever.
230![]() |
Slap Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:58:21pm |
re: #195 Walter L. Newton
I agree, but must admit that one of the biggest belly laughs I've had in ages was while watching a portion of her performance on a TV special. She performed a cover of Stevie Wonder's "I Wish", and maybe it's just me, but this skinny, very Caucasian Canadian female singing the following lyrics was just mondo absurdo:
"Looking back on when I
Was a little nappy-headed boy..."
You just can't make this shit up.
231![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:58:47pm |
re: #229 Walter L. Newton
Gold is gold. The ring on your finger may have gold in it that was produced by the sweat (and maybe actual blood) of a African. Or it may be from melted down American coins from the last 150 years, or from bullion that has been sitting in vaults for 10 of years, whatever.
Then you're racist scum who cares more about the gold market than human lives.
232![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:59:51pm |
re: #228 LudwigVanQuixote
Enough.
Thank you for clarifying. I now have no doubts left about you.
Yes indeed, if the gold or diamonds you buy come from blood, you should not buy them.
I think that is really sufficient.
You are not the sort of racist filth who openly wants black people murdered by the score, you just think that is less important than the gold market.
OK so you are one who likes to profit from racism and evil, but you are not evil yourself...
Wait. I can't say that.
Why?
Because evil has no messenger.
You are racist scum. You are just too wrapped up in your own shit to see it.
And... what is your proof that a precious metal investment firm like Goldline deal directly with "blood gold?"
If you own any gold, you have no idea where it came from, do you?
233![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:00:15pm |
re: #232 Walter L. Newton
And... what is your proof that a precious metal investment firm like Goldline deal directly with "blood gold?"
If you own any gold, you have no idea where it came from, do you?
Racist scum!
//
234![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:01:27pm |
re: #232 Walter L. Newton
It's pretty easy to source gold, actually.
235![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:02:42pm |
re: #232 Walter L. Newton
So Walter,
Let's turn that around... Should you knowingly buy gold or diamonds from conflict regions knowing full well the human toll in getting it to you?
By purchasing it, are you not perpetuating the abuse and horror?
Does that not make you a party to it?
Are you really so self absorbed or good at rationalization as to avoid seeing that basic connection?
It is very Republican of you to do so. I am impressed.
236![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:03:12pm |
re: #234 Obdicut
It's pretty easy to source gold, actually.
I do love it when others show up with the truth. It gets lonely sometimes.
237![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:03:30pm |
re: #228 LudwigVanQuixote
Enough.
Thank you for clarifying. I now have no doubts left about you.
Yes indeed, if the gold or diamonds you buy come from blood, you should not buy them.
I think that is really sufficient.
You are not the sort of racist filth who openly wants black people murdered by the score, you just think that is less important than the gold market.
OK so you are one who likes to profit from racism and evil, but you are not evil yourself...
Wait. I can't say that.
Why?
Because evil has no messenger.
You are racist scum. You are just too wrapped up in your own shit to see it.
Only you would resort to throwing the bodies of the dead at your imagined enemies. Frankly, I think it's WORSE that whereas the folks in the gold deal tried to at least turn a profit from their abuse of these people's lives and their deaths, you are so pathetically inadequate that you use their deaths to try to score points on a blog.
239![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:03:37pm |
How about this. Most pigs are raised on factory farms that are absolutely horrendous. Mother pigs are artificially inseminated, the piglets are taken away as soon as they are born. They live in cages, never see the light of day, are treated harshly, and butchered harshly. Pigs are highly intelligent. More so than dogs. These places are truly evil.
Most people know all this. They go to the store, buy bacon and sausage, and eat it. Yum. Should they boycott the industry? Sure, that would be for the best. Are they evil for not doing so? No.
240![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:04:28pm |
241![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:04:42pm |
re: #239 cliffster
Careful - LVQ will take that mean you think Africans are just like pigs.
242![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:05:01pm |
re: #229 Walter L. Newton
Gold is gold. The ring on your finger may have gold in it that was produced by the sweat (and maybe actual blood) of a African. Or it may be from melted down American coins from the last 150 years, or from bullion that has been sitting in vaults for 10 of years, whatever.
And about the German gold in my teeth from when I lived there in the 1980s I don't even wish to speculate.
But then what product can you guarantee to be "clean" in terms of the human suffering it may represent. Bananas, rubber, coal, coffee, tea, silk, cotton, jewels of any kind, produce of any kind, not to mention animal products.
I hope this observation does not make me racist scum.
243![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:05:30pm |
re: #228 LudwigVanQuixote
You know, the Taylor/Robertson connection stunk, stinks and I agree with your basic opinion about those two.
All of you're other extrapolations about Goldline/Bush/Beck and the blood of this and that, is simply that, speculation, unfounded speculation which you have no proof other than "Now I will grant that it is possible that is all just coincidence."
You claim to be a scientist. I suspect that being a scientist includes the ability to be a critical thinker, to be able to be logical and a dab of common sense.
Well, you knight-jump machinations to try to connect gold and murders comes across more like a pulp novel, than a respectable well thought out scenario.
244![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:06:06pm |
re: #89 Bagua
Hysterical hyperbole.
Not only "Histrionic", also Antisocial, Narcissistic, Obsessive-Compulsive and certainly paranoid. One could make a case for Schizotypal as well, but I wouldn't.
That is five of the ten recognized personality disorders in one individual.
245![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:06:06pm |
re: #234 Obdicut
It's pretty easy to source gold, actually.
How? The Claddagh ring on my finger says "Made in Ireland". Beyond that, how would I know anything?
246![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:07:05pm |
re: #245 Cato the Elder
How? The Claddagh ring on my finger says "Made in Ireland". Beyond that, how would I know anything?
Ask LVQ - unless you LIKE to support murder.
247![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:07:38pm |
re: #239 cliffster
How about this. Most pigs are raised on factory farms that are absolutely horrendous. Mother pigs are artificially inseminated, the piglets are taken away as soon as they are born. They live in cages, never see the light of day, are treated harshly, and butchered harshly. Pigs are highly intelligent. More so than dogs. These places are truly evil.
Most people know all this. They go to the store, buy bacon and sausage, and eat it. Yum. Should they boycott the industry? Sure, that would be for the best. Are they evil for not doing so? No.
First of all, there is a huge difference between the life of a pig and the life of a human.
Second of all, if your purchase is what makes the evil actions happen, because your money is the motive for doing so, then you are guilty for the act as well.
If I finance blood diamonds I finance murder.
If I do not know that, then that is different, but if I do actually know it is the case and then say it is not my fault, it is just a rationalization.
Of course it is evil.
Evil has no messenger.
That means, amongst other things that if your actions inspired someone else to do evil, you are also to blame.
248![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:08:43pm |
re: #245 Cato the Elder
It should have a maker's mark on it somewhere, and anyone dealing with gold has Weights and Measures (or their equivalent int heir home country) up their ass 24/7. It's very easy to make a lot of money by changing purity slightly, so it's a big deal.
Most countries make it illegal to manufacture anything with gold without a hallmark, aside from industrial applications, but they have to declare their sources, too.
249![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:09:07pm |
re: #247 LudwigVanQuixote
Evil has no messenger.
That means, amongst other things that if your actions inspired someone else to do evil, you are also to blame.
So, if your paranoid rambling rants cause someone to doubt, say, AGW, then are you to blame for the evil that arises from it?
250![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:09:08pm |
re: #241 Guanxi88
Careful - LVQ will take that mean you think Africans are just like pigs.
Ahh back to racist scumbag you.
Clearly gold is worth more than Africans.
I mean they are only black people right... You would not say that gold is worth more than white people would you?
But back to you...
You were the one to bring this up on this thread in the first place as a jibe at me.
Don't blame me for taking offence.
I am not a racist scumbag like you.
251![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:09:19pm |
re: #234 Obdicut
I asked if you own any gold, jewerly or something like that, do you know where it came from? That's what I asked.
Of course gold that is assayed, bullioned, marked, can be traced to its' source. But hundred of ounces of gold are bought and sold and traded every day and then melted down a re-assayed and ends back up in investment portfolios or at a jeweler, and then made into something, and you have no idea as to the origin of that gold. It ca be a mixture of a hundred sources, many years old, or one year old.
252![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:09:36pm |
I lump Alex Jones into that as well.
Why do these freaks have such a large audience?
253![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:10:06pm |
re: #250 LudwigVanQuixote
Ahh back to racist scumbag you.
Clearly gold is worth more than Africans.
I mean they are only black people right... You would not say that gold is worth more than white people would you?
But back to you...
You were the one to bring this up on this thread in the first place as a jibe at me.
Don't blame me for taking offence.
I am not a racist scumbag like you.
No, LVQ, you're nothing like me. Nothing like me at all, and I think we're both pleased by the fact.
254![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:12:11pm |
re: #250 LudwigVanQuixote
You were the one to bring this up on this thread in the first place as a jibe at me.Don't blame me for taking offence.
I am not a racist scumbag like you.
I'm sorry - I thought citing an instance of your hysterical hyperbole would illustrate perfectly the situation with Bagua.
And, again, I'm not the one using Taylor's dead to make an incoherent point on a blog. That exploitation of the dead is all yours.
255![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:12:18pm |
re: #251 Walter L. Newton
Yes, I know where all of my gold jewelery-- which I have barely any of, comes from. It is also illegal to melt down gold without a shitload of permits and declaring the provenance as well.
The gold rings my fiancee currently wears were my grandmother's and they were her mother's, and the gold for them came from the Alaskan gold fields.
256![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:12:19pm |
re: #249 Guanxi88
So, if your paranoid rambling rants cause someone to doubt, say, AGW, then are you to blame for the evil that arises from it?
Ahhh and you think that is clever...
Well no, I am not paranoid and my statements about AGW are backed by data and evidence.
As to delusional, I repeat, this shit storm came down on you when you not me, but you, sniped at your imagined enemies with the bodies of dead africans.
You then went on to defend the people behind the crime and you then went on to defend the gold trade in general.
That makes you into racist filth.
I repeat.
If white people were being murdered by the score to get that gold you would be pissed.
But you are not pissed at that.
That makes you racist scum.
257![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:12:37pm |
re: #248 Obdicut
It should have a maker's mark on it somewhere, and anyone dealing with gold has Weights and Measures (or their equivalent int heir home country) up their ass 24/7. It's very easy to make a lot of money by changing purity slightly, so it's a big deal.
Most countries make it illegal to manufacture anything with gold without a hallmark, aside from industrial applications, but they have to declare their sources, too.
Hallmarks do not represent the origin of the item, it indicates the maker of the item. Dealers who buy gold buys ounce after ounce of gold rings, coins, fillings, gold used in electronics and so on, an it's all melted down, turned into bullion and then resold.
A hallmark doesn't represent anymore then the origins of the company or jeweler or artist that made a certain piece, whether a ring, a silver teapot and so on.
258![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:13:16pm |
re: #247 LudwigVanQuixote
First of all, there is a huge difference between the life of a pig and the life of a human.
Not really. Pigs are easily intelligent enough to feel the full weight of the torture and misery we subject them to.
Second of all, if your purchase is what makes the evil actions happen, because your money is the motive for doing so, then you are guilty for the act as well.If I finance blood diamonds I finance murder.
If I do not know that, then that is different, but if I do actually know it is the case and then say it is not my fault, it is just a rationalization.
Of course it is evil.
Evil has no messenger.
That means, amongst other things that if your actions inspired someone else to do evil, you are also to blame.
That sounds good on paper. But like I said, these places are truly evil, people know about them, and they put their money into it anyways. The only conclusions to be drawn are, 95% of humanity is "truly evil", or there's something wrong with your logic.
260![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:15:06pm |
re: #256 LudwigVanQuixote
Ahhh and you think that is clever...
Well no, I am not paranoid and my statements about AGW are backed by data and evidence.
As to delusional, I repeat, this shit storm came down on you when you not me, but you, sniped at your imagined enemies with the bodies of dead africans.
You then went on to defend the people behind the crime and you then went on to defend the gold trade in general.
That makes you into racist filth.
I repeat.
If white people were being murdered by the score to get that gold you would be pissed.
But you are not pissed at that.
That makes you racist scum.
Gotcha, then. That makes me racist filth - that I point out that your supposed BUSH-BECK-ROBERTSON nexus of evil didn't exist at all, and was, in fact, another one of your over-the-top, divorced-from-reality, out-where-the-buses-don't-run tirades. It's all quite clear to me.
261![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:15:35pm |
re: #254 Guanxi88
I'm sorry - I thought citing an instance of your hysterical hyperbole would illustrate perfectly the situation with Bagua.
And, again, I'm not the one using Taylor's dead to make an incoherent point on a blog. That exploitation of the dead is all yours.
That would be yet another lie.
Care to scroll up and see what started this?
maybe his pockets, like those of Bush, Beck, and Robertson, are lined with blood from African gold.
That would be your quote.
To which I responded:
So let's look at the nature of what you just said.
You managed to bring wholesale mass murder of innocent people into a personal jibe on a blog.
So is it that their lives didn't count because they were poor?
Is it that they do not deserve the dignity of treating their murder with the horror it deserves because rich white American conservatives financed the murder?
Or is it just because you think that dead black babies deserve the level of respect you just gave them?
You really just crossed the line into scum.
Is your memory that short are are you simply that stupid?
Well I never expect much in the way of brains from racists.
262![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:15:49pm |
re: #259 Racer X
Seriously?
Seriously?
Life is too short guys.
Someday, the earth will crash into the sun. Or vice versa.
263![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:16:09pm |
re: #258 cliffster
That sounds good on paper. But like I said, these places are truly evil, people know about them, and they put their money into it anyways. The only conclusions to be drawn are, 95% of humanity is "truly evil", or there's something wrong with your logic.
Do your really think that LVQ makes up 5% of the human race?
264![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:16:44pm |
re: #255 Obdicut
Yes, I know where all of my gold jewelery-- which I have barely any of, comes from. It is also illegal to melt down gold without a shitload of permits and declaring the provenance as well.
The gold rings my fiancee currently wears were my grandmother's and they were her mother's, and the gold for them came from the Alaskan gold fields.
What are you talking about? Fine, you know where a certain ring comes from. Now, you could walk into almost any bullion dealer and sell that hunk of gold, and from that point on, the hunk of gold becomes nothing more than a hunk of gold, which will end up being melted down with a bunch of other gold (from numerous sources) and made into one chunk of bullion.
Do you know what the "declaring the provenance" amounts to... it's a form I would sign at the bullion dealer stating that I own the gold and I did not steal it.
Really, back down from this. I am a life long collector of ancient and modern coins and other artifacts and I know a hell of a lot more about how precious metal is dealt with every day.
Or... prove you points, links, information please...
266![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:19:02pm |
267![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:19:02pm |
268![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:19:36pm |
Ot-
New episode of LOST tonight... "Lighthouse."
269![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:19:54pm |
re: #266 Walter L. Newton
I'm not human, what's your point.
Aha! Now were getting somewhere. The truth comes out.
270![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:21:02pm |
re: #257 Walter L. Newton
Using a hallmark you definitely can, if you want, trace the source of the gold. All the gold that a jewelery maker does he has to keep a careful paper trail on.
It's a mixmash of Federal and State laws, but every state requires every piece of paperwork regarding a gold transaction to be retained indefinitely, either by the dealer themselves or submitted to the federal authorities. So yes, it is possible to trace the provenance of gold over an indefinite chain.
271![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:21:09pm |
re: #268 Walter L. Newton
Ot-
New episode of LOST tonight... "Lighthouse."
I'll not miss this one. I look forward to the post-show debrief if you are around.
272![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:21:25pm |
re: #261 LudwigVanQuixote
Is your memory that short are are you simply that stupid?
Well I never expect much in the way of brains from racists.
LVQ - you know perfectly well that you dug into Bagua on the basis of the (paranoid, perhaps) supposition that his comment "Hysterical hyperbole" was directed at you.
You tear into the guy, and, in order to assist you, I suggest that he is perhaps one of those evil souls who - like Bush, Beck, and Robertston - has pockets bloodstained from African gold.
Then, as it happens, there's not really much to the story - Robertson started a deal with Taylor, but nothing came of it, so, the Beck and Bush nexus is untenable, making the whole thing a
HYSTERICAL HYPERBOLE
in the best traditions of LVQ, and thus illustrating, albeit unknowingly, the point even better than my original suggestion did.
Is your memory that short, or are you that stupid? But then, one oughtn't to expect much from raving lunatics.
I console myself in the certain knowledge that, were you to throw a stapler each time you throw insults here, there'd be no danger of you ever striking another person.
273![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:21:59pm |
re: #258 cliffster
That sounds good on paper. But like I said, these places are truly evil, people know about them, and they put their money into it anyways. The only conclusions to be drawn are, 95% of humanity is "truly evil", or there's something wrong with your logic.
Well there are always shades and degrees. Of course everyone has sins.
Some are worse than others. Some are more avoidable than others.
Here is a difference, or perhaps an example.
Was your clothing made in a sweatshop by child labor. It is damn hard these days to find clothing that isn't. Are you evil because your desire to not be naked out weighs your desire to not fund sweatshops - no.
Are you fully blameless? NO you are not. Why? Because you don't agitate to get non sweat shop goods and then pay for them.
But you need clothes.
You don't need shiny metal. You don't need shiny carbon either.
There is more than enough gold available for legitimate uses that was already mined, and you can make diamonds that are just as much diamonds as salt is salt, and no brown people were murdered.
Also not all gold comes from conflict regions.
You can truly avoid buying conflict gold or diamonds and the whole industry exists because you pay for it.
So that makes you much more evil than the case of buying clothes from child labor.
Now here is a great idea for the second part... Pay a tailor. Get nice clothing that will last and wear that.
274![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:22:00pm |
re: #264 Walter L. Newton
Okay. What are the state laws for your state regarding the retention of records for selling anything made of precious metal?
275![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:24:00pm |
re: #272 Guanxi88
Actually, Bagua said he meant Beck and not me and we settled that. You were the one who brought the dead Africans to bear, and you still don't see it as inappropriate. You are even now defending it.
So go on with your bad self.
I stand by my judgement of racist asshole for you.
276![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:27:16pm |
re: #248 Obdicut
It should have a maker's mark on it somewhere, and anyone dealing with gold has Weights and Measures (or their equivalent int heir home country) up their ass 24/7. It's very easy to make a lot of money by changing purity slightly, so it's a big deal.
Most countries make it illegal to manufacture anything with gold without a hallmark, aside from industrial applications, but they have to declare their sources, too.
How about a custom gold chain with no marks at all except on the standard clasp? How would you tell where that came from?
277![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:27:21pm |
re: #275 LudwigVanQuixote
Actually, Bagua said he meant Beck and not me and we settled that. You were the one who brought the dead Africans to bear, and you still don't see it as inappropriate. You are even now defending it.
So go on with your bad self.
I stand by my judgement of racist asshole for you.
Bagua said he meant Beck - well, if the shoe fits... YOU certainly thought he meant you. Perhaps you see something there, perhaps you don't. To my mind, it works BOTH ways. Perhaps you're not clever or introspective enough to consider this possibility.
As for the dead Africans - since you've admitted that Beck and Bush didn't get any money from the deal, are you perhaps prepared to consider the possibility that you used the deaths in Liberia as an occasion to take the piss out of your political adversaries, and would just as readily reached out to grasp the dead of another atrocity, were they available to you?
So go on with your bad self, LVQ.
I stand by judgment of you as an ill-tempered and disturbed person.
278![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:28:33pm |
re: #270 Obdicut
Using a hallmark you definitely can, if you want, trace the source of the gold. All the gold that a jewelery maker does he has to keep a careful paper trail on.
It's a mixmash of Federal and State laws, but every state requires every piece of paperwork regarding a gold transaction to be retained indefinitely, either by the dealer themselves or submitted to the federal authorities. So yes, it is possible to trace the provenance of gold over an indefinite chain.
I can go right into Rocky Mountain Coins and Bullion right now, hand them a gold ring, with the only markings being the 14k mark, they will weigh it and offer me a price, and I will since a small sale receipt sized piece of paper that states the ring belongs to me and I it is not stolen material.
That's it. The form is in triplicate. One copy for me, one for the store and one for the state. There is NOTHING more on the providence of the ring, the gold, or anything, no more information attached to that piece of gold.
And then, even before I leave, that piece of gold is thrown into a box full of other pieces of gold, not even with the paper work. Before the end of the day, that piece of gold is unidentifiable with the hundreds of other rings in that box.
And Rocky Mountain Coin is one of the largest coin and bullion dealers in the West, so I am not talking about some two bit pawn shop.
You don't know what you are talking about.
You have yet to link to me any proof of what you are saying.
279![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:29:17pm |
re: #277 Guanxi88
And you still do not care that the deal was made or the support for the dictator given and that cost lives.
Just put on your sheet and have done with asshole.
280![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:29:46pm |
re: #276 Cato the Elder
How about a custom gold chain with no marks at all except on the standard clasp? How would you tell where that came from?
You can't. A Hallmark does not tell you where the gold originated.
281![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:30:03pm |
re: #276 Cato the Elder
Well, where did you get it from?
This whole discussion is kind of idiotic. If you want to be careful about the source of your gold, it's easy. If you suddenly have a warehouse full of gold items, yes, it's going to be a headache sorting out where they came from.
And most antique gold, pre-1800, came from a lot of unsavoury sources, but most things pre-1800 were pretty unsavory in general from a modern standard.
All I'm saying is that if you want to make sure that the gold object you're buying was made with non-conflict gold, you can, and it's easy.
282![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:30:36pm |
283![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:30:58pm |
re: #279 LudwigVanQuixote
And you still do not care that the deal was made or the support for the dictator given and that cost lives.
Just put on your sheet and have done with asshole.
I wasn't aware I was required to oppose the deal that became the foundation for your delusional BUSH_BECK_ROBERTSON gold cabal.
Just put on your straitjacket and be done with it.
284![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:31:26pm |
re: #273 LudwigVanQuixote
So the point I'll take away from this is, there are varying degrees of evil, and it is described by a continuum.
Given this point, if you think the distributors of this gold are high on the evil scale, which you seem to, then I think distributors of most pork are equally high. And it's just as easy to avoid sausage as it is to avoid buying gold.
285![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:31:33pm |
re: #278 Walter L. Newton
Exactly. And every time that transaction took place, a similar thing happened.
And then, even before I leave, that piece of gold is thrown into a box full of other pieces of gold, not even with the paper work. Before the end of the day, that piece of gold is unidentifiable with the hundreds of other rings in that box.
Really? So if an investigator from the state came and said, "You bought this ring and we discovered it's stolen, please show it to us," they'd say, "oh, it's all mixed up with these other rings, we have no clue where it went"?
286![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:32:45pm |
re: #285 Obdicut
Exactly. And every time that transaction took place, a similar thing happened.
Really? So if an investigator from the state came and said, "You bought this ring and we discovered it's stolen, please show it to us," they'd say, "oh, it's all mixed up with these other rings, we have no clue where it went"?
There's a tag attached to it, which is removed prior to its going to the refinery, where it's melted down. The individual ring is traceable, to a limited extent - the metallic content of it, less so.
287![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:32:58pm |
re: #281 Obdicut
Well, where did you get it from?
This whole discussion is kind of idiotic. If you want to be careful about the source of your gold, it's easy. If you suddenly have a warehouse full of gold items, yes, it's going to be a headache sorting out where they came from.
And most antique gold, pre-1800, came from a lot of unsavoury sources, but most things pre-1800 were pretty unsavory in general from a modern standard.
All I'm saying is that if you want to make sure that the gold object you're buying was made with non-conflict gold, you can, and it's easy.
And you have yet to tell us how easy it is. You mention hallmarks, wrong, you mention state laws about buying and selling, you evidently don't know about the laws.
So, I am still waiting... who easy is it for you to know the actual original, the mine or country that any piece of gold came out of.
Let's take a simple, very accessible place... the jewelry department at Walmart. Tell me who you would walk into Walmart and find out about the actual origin of a gold ring for sale there?
288![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:34:02pm |
re: #285 Obdicut
Exactly. And every time that transaction took place, a similar thing happened.
Really? So if an investigator from the state came and said, "You bought this ring and we discovered it's stolen, please show it to us," they'd say, "oh, it's all mixed up with these other rings, we have no clue where it went"?
How would they know Rocky Mountain Coin bought it?
289![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:34:47pm |
re: #282 Walter L. Newton
Five years in prison and a $10,000 fine if its a coin.
290![]() |
HappyWarrior Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:35:13pm |
Did that fool seriously compare revolution to evolution? Nice bust by Jon and Sam on why Beck's screed on all things progressive was bullcrap. A little over the top perhaps but valid points made.
291![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:36:34pm |
re: #284 cliffster
So the point I'll take away from this is, there are varying degrees of evil, and it is described by a continuum.
Given this point, if you think the distributors of this gold are high on the evil scale, which you seem to, then I think distributors of most pork are equally high. And it's just as easy to avoid sausage as it is to avoid buying gold.
SO I am the wrong person to talk about that too. I promise I do not eat pork sausage.
However, the damage done to the environment by CAFOs is atrocious and yes the treatment of animals i n those places is atrocious, and yes I am very certain that one should treat animals well before slaughter.
Those are basic rules of Kashrut.
And while I do not think that eating a cheeseburger is evil, I do certainly think that financing a system that is needlessly cruel to animals and destroys the environment is evil - particularly when the entire way that CAFOs arose was by corporate deals to relax EPA regulations and the results - not just methane, but things like wysteria are very dangerous.
Look that up.
Seriously. Look at the environmental damage caused by it, factor in the needless cruelty financed by greed and corrupt politicians and yes it is pretty evil.
It is still not as bad as the blood gold and blood diamonds though because people are more important than pigs.
292![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:36:48pm |
re: #286 Guanxi88
There's a tag attached to it, which is removed prior to its going to the refinery, where it's melted down. The individual ring is traceable, to a limited extent - the metallic content of it, less so.
Using Rocky Mountain Coin as my example, there is no tag on the ring. There is a three part form that has been filled out with my name and address, the amount that Rocky Mountain Coin would have paid for the bullion and my signature indicating that the ring belonged to me and was not stolen.
There is nothing on the form about the origin of the gold or where I obtained the ring from and so on. There is no way to trace the origin of gold that is sold as bullion.
And that bullion is then resold, made into new things and the beat goes on.
293![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:37:25pm |
re: #288 Walter L. Newton
Oh good lord, Walter. Say they have a suspect who said, "We sold it to Rocky Mountain Coin".
You know, coins actually have a pretty damn easy way to trace the source of the gold, given that they're, you know, coins.
re: #286 Guanxi88
Again: All I'm saying is that if you care about the source of the gold, you can ascertain that from the manufacturer. If they refuse to tell you, you can refuse to buy the ring, but most places will tell you-- I think by state law in some places they have to tell you. You can follow the chain quite a long way, especially if there's any legal matter involved.
294![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:39:45pm |
re: #292 Walter L. Newton
Well, they're violating Colorado state law, then:
[Link: www.colorado.gov...]
Any person engaged in the business of buying valuable articles (or any person who purchases five or more valuable articles during any thirty-day period) must secure adequate identification from the seller. Purchasers must be 18 years or older.
The Purchaser must keep a register and record of transactions, using forms provided by the local law enforcement agency, with the following information: Name, address, birth date, and ID # from seller, Date, time, and place of purchase, Description of each article purchased and ID#. Written declaration of seller's ownership and how long it has been owned, Seller must sign name in register, Purchaser must keep these records for at least 3 years after the last date of purchase.
295![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:40:15pm |
re: #293 Obdicut
Oh good lord, Walter. Say they have a suspect who said, "We sold it to Rocky Mountain Coin".
You know, coins actually have a pretty damn easy way to trace the source of the gold, given that they're, you know, coins.
re: #286 Guanxi88
Again: All I'm saying is that if you care about the source of the gold, you can ascertain that from the manufacturer. If they refuse to tell you, you can refuse to buy the ring, but most places will tell you-- I think by state law in some places they have to tell you. You can follow the chain quite a long way, especially if there's any legal matter involved.
And Rocky Mountain Coin will ask for the name of the suspect, check their records and pull the paperwork. Ah, suspect signed the paperwork that say he didn't steal it... Rocky Mountain Coin is not responsible for the stolen ring if it has already be sent to melt.
You have yet to prove what you are claiming... link me to these laws.
296![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:42:00pm |
re: #294 Obdicut
Well, they're violating Colorado state law, then:
[Link: www.colorado.gov...]
No they are not... this is exactly what I said above, and there are three copies of this. But there is nothing on the form that indicate the ORIGIN of the gold itself.
And it is the seller who states the item is legal pocessed.
297![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:44:39pm |
re: #294 Obdicut
Well, they're violating Colorado state law, then:
[Link: www.colorado.gov...]
ANd that ID# from seller is a tax id or SS#. I've worked at bullion dealers in this state, I know what the forms look like.
I will say it one more time, there is nothing that indicates the birthplace of the gold content in the ring.
You may own a piece of jewelry which you can providence yourself, but after multiple sales and melts, a pice of gold simply becomes an unidentifiable amalgam or precious metal.
298![]() |
Obdicut Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:45:26pm |
re: #296 Walter L. Newton
You said they threw it in a bin with no tag and it got mixed up with other rings. That is obviously untrue.
And then, even before I leave, that piece of gold is thrown into a box full of other pieces of gold, not even with the paper work. Before the end of the day, that piece of gold is unidentifiable with the hundreds of other rings in that box.
Whatever. I'm out of this pointless goddamn argument.
The point is that if you want to make sure that your gold comes from a good source, you can. It is entirely within your power to do so.
299![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:49:06pm |
re: #298 Obdicut
You said they threw it in a bin with no tag and it got mixed up with other rings. That is obviously untrue.
Whatever. I'm out of this pointless goddamn argument.
The point is that if you want to make sure that your gold comes from a good source, you can. It is entirely within your power to do so.
You fought the good fight. I am impressed. Rock on with your bad self.
:)
300![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:49:51pm |
re: #296 Walter L. Newton
Cash4gold was melting the gold sent them before the checks even arrived. They are meant to wait until the customer agrees with the price, otherwise, it's melt at will.
Some local jurisdictions or states may have regulations governing pawn shops record keeping and pawn duration because of their association with stolen goods, but to otherwise image every gold ring has a chain of custody awaiting some investigator is the stuff of TV and dime store novels.
301![]() |
cliffster Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:52:56pm |
302![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:58:18pm |
Under the Oregon law, once the 30 days is past, it can go straight to the smelter. There is no chain of custody. Gold is a freely exchanged commodity. I don't see any violation if they noted its description and weight before throwing it into the box, as long as they waited 30 days before selling them on.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
303![]() |
LudwigVanQuixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 1:59:14pm |
I think I will close this with a fable from the Talmud.
The tale is told of a kingdom that had a sharp rise in thefts, breaking and entering and even robbery murders on the streets.
The king ordered a large portion of the merchants who sold gold executed.
Crime went way down.
He said, when you plug up the holes, you give the rats no place to go.
304![]() |
Walter L. Newton Tue, Feb 23, 2010 2:02:20pm |
re: #300 Bagua
Cash4gold was melting the gold sent them before the checks even arrived. They are meant to wait until the customer agrees with the price, otherwise, it's melt at will.
Some local jurisdictions or states may have regulations governing pawn shops record keeping and pawn duration because of their association with stolen goods, but to otherwise image every gold ring has a chain of custody awaiting some investigator is the stuff of TV and dime store novels.
And the original proposition by Obdicut was that any piece of gold could be providence to it's mining birthplace and that every piece of gold is tracable from it birthplace to it's present form.
The discussion was not if you could identify a certain ring to a certain owner, or if you could prove a ring was stolen.
But typical, deflection, and soon enough, the subject has been changed and victory claimed.
I cut opal. I can providence a piece of opal to a certain Coober Pedy mine because I deal direct with the owner of the mine.
But, if I buy a parcel of opal from a Coober Pedy miners co-op, then, all I know is the opal came from the Coober Pedy area.
If I buy a parcel of mixed opal from Ebay, I may be able to say... well, this is Coober Pedy opal, or this is Queensland opal, but I'm not further from the mining birthplace than before.
And it's even more problematic with something like bullion which can be melted down, formed into a bar, or a new ring or a coin, can be bought, sold and traded all over the world, and after a while, there is not much you can do to discover the mine birthplace of any certain piece of gold... unless it just came fresh out of a mine and you purchased it directly from the source... like the opal I mention above.
305![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 2:05:18pm |
re: #304 Walter L. Newton
And the original proposition by Obdicut was that any piece of gold could be providence to it's mining birthplace and that every piece of gold is tracable from it birthplace to it's present form.
[...]
In a fantasy world, everything is possible.
306![]() |
Guanxi88 Tue, Feb 23, 2010 2:12:27pm |
DSM-IV:
295.3
293.81
Axis II, cluster B:
301.50
Feel free to add your own
307![]() |
Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 23, 2010 2:15:22pm |
re: #281 Obdicut
Well, where did you get it from?
This whole discussion is kind of idiotic. If you want to be careful about the source of your gold, it's easy. If you suddenly have a warehouse full of gold items, yes, it's going to be a headache sorting out where they came from.
And most antique gold, pre-1800, came from a lot of unsavoury sources, but most things pre-1800 were pretty unsavory in general from a modern standard.
All I'm saying is that if you want to make sure that the gold object you're buying was made with non-conflict gold, you can, and it's easy.
I got it years ago from a reputable local jeweler. At the time I was not aware of "conflict gold" and didn't check. In the future (should I ever have money for anything made of gold again) I will.
308![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Tue, Feb 23, 2010 2:22:21pm |
Now that the issue of "products furnished through slavery and murder" has been worked out, what are folks feelings about visiting places like the Pyramids (assumed to have been built by slave Jews), the Great Wall of China (built mostly by slaves from Macao), and the Roman ruins throughout Europe (built by slaves)? Should this slavery be endorsed with tourism dollars?
309![]() |
ludwigvanquixote Tue, Feb 23, 2010 2:26:20pm |
re: #308 karmic_inquisitor
Now that the issue of "products furnished through slavery and murder" has been worked out, what are folks feelings about visiting places like the Pyramids (assumed to have been built by slave Jews), the Great Wall of China (built mostly by slaves from Macao), and the Roman ruins throughout Europe (built by slaves)? Should this slavery be endorsed with tourism dollars?
Ummm surely you can see the difference between the product of slave labor thousands of years ago and financing actual slavers today?
310![]() |
karmic_inquisitor Tue, Feb 23, 2010 2:38:40pm |
re: #309 ludwigvanquixote
Ummm surely you can see the difference between the product of slave labor thousands of years ago and financing actual slavers today?
I don't think I stated or implied such an equivalence.
What I have observed time and time again at these different ruins is that those who built them (other than honoring the greatness of "the ancient Egyptians" or "the Chinese" or "the Romans") aren't mentioned or honored.
If you walk through the ampetheater in Lyon, for example, you will see no mention of the slaves who built it, nor the walls for the city, nor the aqueduct.
311![]() |
Bagua Tue, Feb 23, 2010 3:31:06pm |
re: #306 Guanxi88
DSM-IV:
295.3
293.81
Axis II, cluster B:
301.50Feel free to add your own
My money is on Axis II cluster B, but with strong elements of several others after the decimal point. But the first two could be the end result.
312![]() |
Silvergirl Tue, Feb 23, 2010 4:39:37pm |
Did anyone notice Beck at the chalkboard when he crossed the 'L' in evolution as though it were a 'T'? Just noticing the details.
313![]() |
Dr. Shalit Tue, Feb 23, 2010 6:11:15pm |
re: #15 Charles
Charles -
Stormfront - ipso facto - has "issues." Same "issues" that lost WWII for Germany - see: Einstein, A-Bomb, etc. "Jewish Science" Works as a general rule.
Was RUSH better last year than Beck this year? In a word - YES.
BOTH are entertainers, Beck's schtick seems darker and more conspiratorial.
-S-
Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...
Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.
MikeySDCA
A Case Study in the Evolution of Birtherism: Donald Trump
2 days, 1 hour ago
Views: 390 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
thecommodore
The Blaze: 'We Finally Have a Document from Obama's College Years — Sort Of'
2 days, 3 hours ago
Views: 785 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 83 • Rating: 8
Mickey_being_mickey
Rare post-WWII movie highlighting soldiers dealing with shellshock now online
2 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 532 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 24 • Rating: 4
MichaelJ
Uranium Enriched to Higher Level Is Found in Iran by U.N.
2 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 342 • Comments: 4
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
Mickey_being_mickey
Meghan McCain tells us how she feels about wingnuts
2 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 857 • Comments: 12
Tweets: 47 • Rating: 3
Bubblehead II
Not All The News Out Of Idaho Is Bad
3 days, 1 hour ago
Views: 655 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 35 • Rating: 18
Kragar
Bryan Fischer Warns That Whiny Haters Will Be the End of the GOP (!)
3 days, 4 hours ago
Views: 1,031 • Comments: 9
Tweets: 42 • Rating: 12
Millicent Islam
Federal Marshals Searching for Notorious Neo-Nazi Bill White
3 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 745 • Comments: 10
Tweets: 99 • Rating: 14
wrenchwench
Formerly Undocumented Long Island Heart Surgeon Hopes for Changes to Immigration Law
4 days, 2 hours ago
Views: 484 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 4 • Rating: 7
What, me worry?
Tammy Bruce: FOX won't have me because I'm gay
3 days, 10 hours ago
Views: 1,098 • Comments: 35
Tweets: 72 • Rating: 14
Tiny Alien Kitties are Watching You
Lying For Jesus: Something We See More of Every Day, The Ends Justify The Means?
21 minutes ago
Views: 17 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
researchok
Honoring Fallen Civil War Soldiers
32 minutes ago
Views: 25 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
MikeySDCA
The History of the Paper Clip: It Was Invented in 1899. It Hasn't Been Improved Upon Since.
1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Views: 26 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Daniel Ballard
Late Afternoon Light-Kalanchoe
1 day, 1 hour ago
Views: 165 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5
Eclectic Infidel
City College of San Francisco Budget Update
1 day, 1 hour ago
Views: 184 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Michael McBacon
Kansas governor signs 'Shariah bill' to ban Islamic law
1 day, 6 hours ago
Views: 325 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 6
Aigle
National Geographic Traveler Veers Off Track
2 days, 6 hours ago
Views: 715 • Comments: 16
Tweets: 24 • Rating: -7
MichaelJ
Apple TV Slated to Debut in December?
2 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 270 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Ascher
Israeli Who Saved Turk on Everest: You Never Abandon a Friend - Israel News, Ynetnews
2 days, 8 hours ago
Views: 348 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
Haywood Jabloeme
The Harrassment of Patterico & Its Roots in Left-Wing Activism
2 days, 9 hours ago
Views: 586 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
A lot of things wrong with society today are directly attributable to the fact that the people who make the laws are sexually maladjusted. -- from "I Seem To Be a Verb" by R. Buckminster Fuller, 1970.
© 2012 Little Green Footballs
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy


