The Iranian government has been holding three American activists for an entire year, accusing them of espionage. Barrett Brown has more details: Iran Has Detained Three Americans for a Year.
This Friday a demonstration is planned in New York City to bring more attention to these US citizens held captive by Iranian theocrats; here’s the organizers’ website: freethehikers.org.
Its kind of sad that hundreds and thousands of pages of press have been dedicated to Lindsey Lohans well deserved time out while this story can’t even get dredged by Drudge.
I still remember growing up on the outskirts of Tehran back in the early ’70s as a young child, coming back to the states, hearing about the hostage crisis a few years, and asking my parents if our neighbors were still our friends.
It still gets me how much things have changed over the last 4 decades.
And meanwhile, France has declared war on al Qaeda.
Things are looking up.
Of course, we can now expect a slew of typical “the French are cowards” comments.
My bet is that they’ll use the Foreign Legion for this one.
I knew a German gentleman who fell in with bad company as a youth and joined the French Foreign Legion to get himself straightened out. He was my friend, but there was one guy you seriously did not want to mess with.
This is fucking terrible. How come the press or our government have not talked about it? I never new about this.
Dude what? I catch about 30 minutes of network news a day at work (the day shift likes it on and they get there before I leave), and I’ve been seeing news stories about it since it happened!
Remember that modern Iran was founded on the principle that they can do anything and get away with it.
Modern Iran was one of the more secular and liberal places in the middle east for a time. That changed with their revolution, thanks in no small part to the U.S.
Don’t forget how we got where we are, in pondering where best to go from here.
TEHRAN, Iran - The mothers of three Americans jailed in Iran for 10 months left for home Friday, getting one last chance to embrace their children but failing to secure their immediate release.
In a glimmer of hope, Iran announced that two of its nationals held in Iraq by U.S. forces for years were freed Friday. The release raised the possibility that a behind-the-scenes swap was in the offing or that their release was a gesture of goodwill in an attempt to free the Americans.
Exiled brothers urge Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to ‘leave those kids alone’ in YouTube hit
It is unlikely that Iran’s supreme leader has ever muttered the words “absolute rubbish, laddie” while checking a schoolboy’s homework, but a figure resembling Ayatollah Ali Khamenei does feature in a reworking of a Pink Floyd anthem that has been renamed Another Brick in the Wall (Hey Ayatollah, Leave Those Kids Alone!).
The new version – sung by Blurred Vision, two Iranian-born brothers living in exile in Canada – has become a YouTube phenomenon, attracting more than 100,000 hits on the online video site.
The brothers, whose family fled Iran after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and who will not give their surname through fear of reprisals against family members who remain in the country, say the reworked protest song, and the viral success of its video, is acting as a rallying cry for Iranian youth.
The video intercuts footage of the band’s performance with images of street violence following Iran’s disputed elections last year.
Of course, we can now expect a slew of typical “the French are cowards” comments.
My bet is that they’ll use the Foreign Legion for this one.
I knew a German gentleman who fell in with bad company as a youth and joined the French Foreign Legion to get himself straightened out. He was my friend, but there was one guy you seriously did not want to mess with.
This is going to make my trip to Paris in Jan. much more exciting. Especially if there is any “in country” antics being carried out.
Should our president speak up more forcefully on their behalf and speak the truth about their situation? Namely that they are being held “hostage?”
This is a fairly recent article. The Iranians generally give such people back, either as a ‘gracious’ gesture, or in exchange for something they want.
I don’t know, honestly. Part of me would like to hear Obama give the Iranians what-for loudly, and part of me knows that the important part of these conversations do not make it to the newspaper.
Dude what? I catch about 30 minutes of network news a day at work (the day shift likes it on and they get there before I leave), and I’ve been seeing news stories about it since it happened!
Is this about those hikers? If so I stand corrected. I know about them.
I was wondering, I admit… but now we’re on the same page :p re: #36 brookly red
It would! Not sure what they’d be spying on up there tho’! Probably still just some dumb kids that were somewhere they shouldn’t (given the vagueness of the border, somewhere they shouldn’t is ANYWHERE NEAR FREAKING IRAN!)
random reminisce. Also so you know, if you didn’t :)
I know my way around Paris like a native… have been there 6 times in the last 9 years… use public transportation all around town (Metro, RER, buses), stay in 2 star local hotels, eat where the locals eat… I love the city… actually I love France.
A lot depends on who the family knows, connections, net worth, etc. That determines the amount of PR or press coverage you will get for your family members that may be jailed in rogue nations like Iran or North Korea. This is true with these three as well as Aijalon Mahli Gomes who was sentenced to 8 years in North Korea.
there is a lot of doubt as to whether they were arrested in iranian territory or on the iraqi side of the border.
Can’t nobody prove nothing either way.
Nor do I care, I’d like them home, thank you very much.
(When Lee and Ling were being held in North Korea, I went farther—I said I didn’t care if they’d crossed the border willingly and were eating the bodies of the border guards they’d murdered when they were caught, I wanted them returned to the U.S. tout sweet.)
I was wondering, I admit… but now we’re on the same page :p re: #36 brookly red
It would! Not sure what they’d be spying on up there tho’! Probably still just some dumb kids that were somewhere they shouldn’t (given the vagueness of the border, somewhere they shouldn’t is ANYWHERE NEAR FREAKING IRAN!)
well they were Berkley grads & I don’t think Berkley is high on the list of CIA recruitment schools… maybe they were with PETA or something?
I heard the mother of one of the incarcerated girls on the BBC world service.
Her expressed suffering brought tears to my eyes.
The Iranian regime is criminal and uncivilised.
re: #24 windsagio
Yup. So then they could do away with those awful liberal “western” (really just human) values and have their very own police state. Not exactly a Islamic or Persian paradise under the Ayatollahs now is it? The secular folks there would love to have the old government back. Just ask them, if you know a few expats.
Well, not if a Metro station gets blown up in Paris while I’m there. Why couldn’t Sarkozy wait until after my vacation. First time I was there in 2001, they were still patrolling the subway stations with AK-47’s… and the last time I went, ventured out to the suburbs to see where the heavy Muslim populations lived (great food out in those neighborhoods, by the way, nice break from all that everyday French food).
Probably still just some dumb kids that were somewhere they shouldn’t (given the vagueness of the border, somewhere they shouldn’t is ANYWHERE NEAR FREAKING IRAN!)
That’s just it, I have a hard time feeling sorry for someone who goes hiking on the Iran/Iraq boarder. I thought conservatives were against a Nanny state? Well, let these folks darwin themselves…
But, you wouldn’t find me hiking within a hundred kilometers of a country like Iran.
To be fair though, you won’t see me hiking through a National Forest in the USA either.
based on the story Charles posted, it seems they were more likely idealistic youths who were probably too naive to be afraid of the danger they placed themselves in.
I know how we got here. But the hostage situation went on for over a year, and they got away with it. They even received a bonus of military technology. They’ve extended their reach to other countries, blew up a Jewish community center in Argentina, armed Hezbollah, taken over Lebanon, and a host of other activities. They’ve brutally dealt with protesters without any serious repercussions, and the UN and the US can’t think of any way to respond. Which is why they think they can get away with it.
Wouldn’t be the first revolution that went wrong >>
And expats aren’t necessarily the ones to ask, because if they left at the time of the revolution they were generally old regime.
I’m not saying that the current Gov’t of Iran isn’t awful themselves, but rather that its crazy to say that they had a revolution to ‘do whatever they wanted’, when in fact it was to get rid of a hideously repressive dictator.
That’s just it, I have a hard time feeling sorry for someone who goes hiking on the Iran/Iraq boarder. I thought conservatives were against a Nanny state? Well, let these folks darwin themselves…
//a little bit, but only a little.
Conservatives, like liberals, like to close ranks and defend our brothers and sisters from undeserved harm.
Strange thing; despite what everyone says, the people in Paris are like SUPER nice.
True story: I was once staying in Paris with a German friend, and I was super depressed about the end of a love affair.
So he and I are walking down some boulevard or other, and I’m telling him how my life is crushed, I can’t go on, it’s time to make an end of it all.
And a passing French dame in full haut-couture regalia pauses, and says to me in perfectly sweet French-accented perfect German, “The Seine is just over there.”
True story: I was once staying in Paris with a German friend, and I was super depressed about the end of a love affair.
So he and I are walking down some boulevard or other, and I’m telling him how my life is crushed, I can’t go on, it’s time to make an end of it all.
And a passing French dame in full haut-couture regalia pauses, and says to me in perfectly sweet French-accented perfect German, “The Seine is just over there.”
Wouldn’t be the first revolution that went wrong >>
And expats aren’t necessarily the ones to ask, because if they left at the time of the revolution they were generally old regime.
I’m not saying that the current Gov’t of Iran isn’t awful themselves, but rather that its crazy to say that they had a revolution to ‘do whatever they wanted’, when in fact it was to get rid of a hideously repressive dictator.
Let’s not forget that far too many of those hideous stories over the past year out of Iran have had to do with evils invented/perfected by SAVAK under the Shah.
Naturally we don’t know, except there was almost nothing out there, and its a weird way to try to use a spy.
well who knows, and I don’t mean spy in the James Bond sense, but that is the Kurdish area and anything is possible… I guess we will need to wait & see, no?
If I had a decent internet service I probably would have found that. I am getting most of my news from the TV news stations and this story just isn’t as interesting as Lindsey Lohan I guess.
I agree, given their proxy is still holding Gilad Shalit, in vioaltion of every international and humanitarian law for a whole lot longer. Why shouldn’t Iran do this? They suffer no consequences.
I was offered $10,000USD prize and a chance to address an Iranian university for one of the papers. The Irnians who invited me regarded it as a real honor. I said I am not going to Iran and I am not taking this prize because
a) I am a woman and while I will cover up voluntarily I will not cover up when forced to do so.
b) I am a Jew which makes personna non-grata
c) I am a Canadian and I have not forgotten what had been done to the Canadian Zahra Kazemi who was raped to death in one of their prisons. Your text to link…
My would be hosts were really really shocked about my refusal. They couldn’t quite believe it. They kept saying if I came to Iran I would be protected, this was not the right thing for me to do. They were really upset.
re: #63 windsagio
The expats I do know came over more recently. Not from the old regime at all. Some are Jewish families that left under severe pressure, and the rest are secular folks that left to make a better life here.
Went wrong? It went precisely as expected. If you understand what Ayatollah means. The Shah was out and the Ayatollah was in. He promised the end of SAVAK. He just failed to mention the Bassiji. And so on. Out with the secular bad guy in with the theocratic bad guys. Perfect from a “caliphate” perspective.
If I had a decent internet service I probably would have found that. I am getting most of my news from the TV news stations and this story just isn’t as interesting as Lindsey Lohan I guess.
It gives an even better idea of the number of articles if I set it to 100 results per page. The Archive is an incredibly useful way to track media zeitgeist.
It was a golden opportunity to speak truth to people who would be astounded to hear it. And you could have done a demonstrative Oriana Fallaci thing with the burka, had they even tried to force you to wear one.
I would go to any country on earth if given the chance, and tell them exactly what my real impressions were.
Given that if you are imprisoned the prison staff can rape you anytime you want as part of the perks of their job….no. (And they rape men as well as women.)
Germans want to eat him, Spaniards want to beatify him and bookmakers want to hire him.
But Paul the Octopus is a symbol of all that is wrong with the Western world, according to Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Paul became a global celebrity when he correctly predicted the result of all seven German World Cup matches and Spain’s victory over Holland in the final.
He did so by choosing one of two boxes labelled with a team’s national flag in his tank, each of which contained a mussel.
The octopus, which lives at an aquarium in Oberhausen, Germany, was mentioned by Ahmadinejad several times during a speech in Tehran at the weekend.
He said Paul spread ‘Western propaganda and superstition’.
‘Those who believe in this type of thing cannot be the leaders of the global nations that aspire, like Iran, to human perfection, basing themselves in the love of all sacred values,’ he added.
Paul represents decadence and decay among Iran’s enemies, the president said.
I think I made a profound impression by telling them exactly why I was not coming. And I did consult with the Canadian equivalent of the state department first and they advised me in the strongest possible terms to absolutely not go, stating I would be at high risk for being declared a Zionist spy and arrested and vanish. There’s brave, and then there’s foolhardy.
More important things to do then worry about radical Islam every day.
hahaha I pay attention to the news and I have a good memory, this was a big story, the narrative that seems to be floating that the media doesn’t care, not seeing it
The overwhelming consensus is the Shah was more likely to reform than the Theocrats. As the Shah brought secular changes the Islamics freaked & got brutal. Sound familiar? The Shah responded in kind and then some. Also pretty familiar ground, no?
Irrelevant now they are at least as screwed over there as under the Shah. Except now they are far more likely to be attacked by Israel and or the USA. They reap what they sow.
You caught the back reference. Good… if a person is really spiffy with a good memory, comments that connect back references can be a whole lot of fun… if the connection is missed… I come off sounding like an idiot… it’s the chances I have to take as a professional concerned troll.
“Today I was again contacted after being interrogated, I was summoned through a telephone call. I don’t know what the problem is this time. At any rate, tomorrow I have to go to the Evin prosecutor’s office. Maybe they will arrest me, I don’t know.”
That message posted by Mohammad Mostafaei on his blog on July 23 is the last heard from the Iranian lawyer, who represents an Iranian woman whose execution by stoning was recently postponed following an international outcry.
Mostafaei is believed to have gone into hiding after an arrest warrant was issued for him, according to colleagues and activists familiar with the case.
And with no Mostafaei to be found, the Iranian authorities have resorted to taking his wife and brother-in-law “hostage” to pressure him to turn himself in, their lawyer claims.
I don’t know. Sending a group of idiot-looking grad students to hike around the Iranian frontier seems like a pretty bad scheme to me, and I haven’t seen any evidence that they were spying. I take their story at face value, with a slight grain of salt, and hope that things get sorted out.
I’m not sure who you talk to you, but no, that’s not an overwhelming consensus I’ve seen from anyone who’s seriously studied the region. About the only good thing you can say about the Shah is he was very much pro-West compared to pro-Soviet.
The idea that the Islamists (again, not a label used by anyone who seriously studies these guys… they are all Islamic) somehow stopped the Shah (who was himself installed in a coup) from making the transition to something like a secular western democracy and instead forced him down the route of a secret police state is… well, insane.
The overwhelming consensus is the Shah was more likely to reform than the Theocrats. As the Shah brought secular changes the Islamics freaked & got brutal. Sound familiar? The Shah responded in kind and then some. Also pretty familiar ground, no?
This is not, actually, at all a good description of what occurred. This is revisionist in the extreme. The Shah did not start out a good-hearted secularizer. Sheesh.
this is actually the craziest thing I’ve read all week
and this in particular is just a transparent, blinding lie
Whoa!
RWC is describing what I recall too, that’s a long time ago.
I don’t think he was ‘defending’ the shah; it looked to me like an explanation, not a defense.
If historical perspective now gives a different view of that situation - well, maybe some of us just haven’t kept up.
I have to say that although it is absolute bullshit that the Iranians have not released them, probably the absolute worst place on a very large planet to go hiking in 2009, second only to the rim of an active volcano wearing banana peel shoes, would be the Iran / Iraq border.
This is not, actually, at all a good description of what occurred. This is revisionist in the extreme. The Shah did not start out a good-hearted secularizer. Sheesh.
Did RWC say that the Shah was a good-hearted secularizer?
I didn’t see that in his post.
The overwhelming consensus is the Shah was more likely to reform than the Theocrats. As the Shah brought secular changes the Islamics freaked & got brutal. Sound familiar? The Shah responded in kind and then some. Also pretty familiar ground, no?
Irrelevant now they are at least as screwed over there as under the Shah. Except now they are far more likely to be attacked by Israel and or the USA. They reap what they sow.
They had a secular democracy at one time, with an elected leader (cough*mossadegh*cough) who the US didn’t like. That’s why we supported his overthrow and reinstalled the monarchy.
Let me rephrase. An elected leader who the American oil companies didn’t like.
There was massive, well-justified, popular resentment of the Shah and his policies and methods and backers — but the good and rational alternatives were all dead by the time the anti-Shah groundswell was big enough for an overthrow. So they (and we) got stuck with a notgood and notrational alternative, ‘cause they were just so desperate for any alternative at all.
Maybe not good hearted, but yes he did say the shah was attempting to bring in secular changes.
That is what I recall, as well.
I don’t actually have a lot of knowledge about this situation; but RWC was offering, I thought, his recollection of a situation, and got jumped on as being “revisionist”. I think if someone else has a counter-point to make, or a different view to offer, well, I wish they would. But just accusing RWC of some nefarious revisionism is - odd, IMO.
Strange thing; despite what everyone says, the people in Paris are like SUPER nice.
The people who say otherwise either obviously haven’t been to Paris, or limited their contact with French people to the hawkers selling plastic Eiffel Towers.
The overwhelming consensus is the Shah was more likely to reform than the Theocrats. As the Shah brought secular changes the Islamics freaked & got brutal. Sound familiar? The Shah responded in kind and then some. Also pretty familiar ground, no?
Irrelevant now they are at least as screwed over there as under the Shah. Except now they are far more likely to be attacked by Israel and or the USA. They reap what they sow.
The Shah wasn’t put in place to counter Theocrats though, was he. No, he was put in because Mossaddegh proved to be too much of a leftist for the oil industry.
I’m not accusing him of nefarious revisionism. Just revisionism.
The Shah’s “White Revolution” contained secularization, but it wasn’t secularization. Like most large-scale, sweeping changes imposed by an autocrat, it was mainly about solidifying his own power.
The people who say otherwise either obviously haven’t been to Paris, or limited their contact with French people to the hawkers selling plastic Eiffel Towers.
I’m not accusing him of nefarious revisionism. Just revisionism.
The Shah’s “White Revolution” contained secularization, but it wasn’t secularization. Like most large-scale, sweeping changes imposed by an autocrat, it was mainly about solidifying his own power.
of course it was.
Again, I don’t really know about what led up to the Shah gaining power, etc.
I am interested in hearing more like this: re: #130 goddamnedfrank
Than just having folks yell bullshit.
The Shah wasn’t put in place to counter Theocrats though, was he. No, he was put in because Mossaddegh proved to be too much of a leftist for the oil industry.
Oh yeah. 3 lefty activists. I remember this story. From what I read last year, they weren’t doing so well in captivity. Although I think their politics suck, they don’t deserve this.
and this in particular is just a transparent, blinding lie
meh. i’m with Reine on this. disagree with RWC all you want, but the “lie” thing is just like peeing on a campfire - it doesn’t really achieve anything, and it smells awful…
re: #111 WindUpBird re: #118 Obdicut
Not sure what your argument with me is here.
I am not defending the Shah. I’ll take the heat for my neighbors opinion, glad to share it. It’s speculation anyway as to what “would” have happened.
The Shah tried to secularize the nation. Given who lives there in a religious fanatic context, the result was predictable. Violence. By the same “stone to death” assholes who run the place now. Secularizing a religiously fanatical nation is not a bad thing, given a sane method. I did point out the Shah responded with violence AND THEN SOME. So for those of you that see this as a defense of the Shah, well you read me wrong, I shared my neighbors (and a few others) opinions I asked for.
So sorry the expat Iranians I took the time to have long discussion with don’t share your opinions in the matter. well they lived it they have the right to their feelings. Anyone who thinks I made this up can simply screw themselves.
I don’t actually have a lot of knowledge about this situation; but RWC was offering, I thought, his recollection of a situation, and got jumped on as being “revisionist”. I think if someone else has a counter-point to make, or a different view to offer, well, I wish they would. But just accusing RWC of some nefarious revisionism is - odd, IMO.
Well, personally his comment stood for me because the history of the Shah and Iranian revolution was taught to me along the lines of: “Here’s what the US public was told, and here’s what actually happened”. He presented the first and not the latter.
The timeline and general picture RWC painted has been discredited for at least twenty years. The CIA and the US was a large backer of the Shah and his extremely brutal secret police, the SAVAK, and as long as the oil was not nationalized (the reason for the coup) and he stayed pro-West, he was pretty much free to run Iran however he choose. He wasn’t reformist forcing out Theocrats. He was essentially a puppet (Wester Intelligence services were instrumental in the coup and the setting up of his secret police) forcing out leftist/nationalist government.
Like I said up thread, I’ve been to PAris (and around France) 6 times n the last 9 years, and not once have I purchased a plastic anything as a souvenir. The first artifact I purchased as a “remembrance” of one of my trips was a 1830 5 franc coin of Louis Philippe, for me, that’s a real souvenir, bringing back a piece of the actual history of the country.
I’ve purchased antique books from the booksellers along the Seine, medieval artifacts from merchants in eastern France, handicrafts from artisans… that’s a real souvenir.
He was going to nationalize the oil industry, so we took a shot at not letting that happen subverting democracy and the Islamists did it anyway. Big deal Lose - Lose.
The Shah wasn’t put in place to counter Theocrats though, was he. No, he was put in because Mossaddegh proved to be too much of a leftist for the oil industry.
Sadly, this isn’t the only example of the oil industry steering American foreign policy.
Look, I’m done. Sharing seriously contrary views of others here is just an uphill battle, and need not be. I’ll save that level of effort for my own opinions.
And I know several Iranian families that saw the Shah for what he was, a brutal dictator put in place to stop nationalization and return Iranian to the Western Sphere. Should we do a head count to decide who’s right?
Yes, much of this was in fact done in secret. Your friends are apparently wrong. No need to get pissy, and I’d suggest doing some research before trying to pass off a neighbor’s opinion as “overwhelming consensus” next time.
Well, personally his comment stood for me because the history of the Shah and Iranian revolution was taught to me along the lines of: “Here’s what the US public was told, and here’s what actually happened”. He presented the first and not the latter.
Bullshit. He stated that he was relating the perspective of ex-Iranian friends. Look, i’m all for disagreement…this isn’t an echo chamber. But get hooked on phonics.
re: #120 ointmentfly
According to the article, they’re practically candidates for sainthood.
I do feel for them, but you have to wonder at the judgement thing. You don’t need a TSA sign at an airport to know that hiking Iran off-grid is pretty dangerous.
Hope they make it back safely, but I doubt that dinnerjacket’s going to be swayed by a demonstration. He’s used to them.
Bullshit. He stated that he was relating the perspective of ex-Iranian friends. Look, i’m all for disagreement…this isn’t an echo chamber. But get hooked on phonics.
The overwhelming consensus is the Shah was more likely to reform than the Theocrats. As the Shah brought secular changes the Islamics freaked & got brutal. Sound familiar? The Shah responded in kind and then some. Also pretty familiar ground, no?
Irrelevant now they are at least as screwed over there as under the Shah. Except now they are far more likely to be attacked by Israel and or the USA. They reap what they sow.
Emphasis mine. That’s factual wrong, as in the statement is not true, and its also nothing close to a consensus. You’ll also notice its no where attributed to neighbors.
Look, I’m done. Sharing seriously contrary views of others here is just an uphill battle, and need not be. I’ll save that level of effort for my own opinions.
I have no problem with you saying that the Shah tried to secularize. I have no problem with you saying that the clergy responded virulently, and that it started radicalization and violent resistance.
However, given that the Shah took power in a violent military coup, and given that the Shah’s ‘secularization’ regime was mainly about consolidating his own power, I don’t think the view you’ve transmitted here is in the least bit valid.
You can share the view all you want. Expect me to share mine right back at you.
So the Islamists were simply reacting to our trampling of the great Iranian democracy and not taking advantage of the situation for the ends they so desired?
Look, I’m done. Sharing seriously contrary views of others here is just an uphill battle, and need not be. I’ll save that level of effort for my own opinions.
Emphasis mine. That’s factual wrong, as in the statement is not true, and its also nothing close to a consensus. You’ll also notice its no where attributed to neighbors.
why, does he have to repeat that he’s sharing what he heard from his neighbors in every single post in order to help us remember it?
like i said. disagree with him all you want. just do it honestly.
The overwhelming consensus is the Shah was more likely to reform than the Theocrats. As the Shah brought secular changes the Islamics freaked & got brutal. Sound familiar? The Shah responded in kind and then some. Also pretty familiar ground, no?
Irrelevant now they are at least as screwed over there as under the Shah. Except now they are far more likely to be attacked by Israel and or the USA. They reap what they sow.
I don’t mind people talking out of their ass, but that’s stating something as much more than your or your neighbor’s opinion.
According to the article, they’re practically candidates for sainthood.
I do feel for them, but you have to wonder at the judgement thing. You don’t need a TSA sign at an airport to know that hiking Iran off-grid is pretty dangerous.
Hope they make it back safely, but I doubt that dinnerjacket’s going to be swayed by a demonstration. He’s used to them.
I’m not sure how much this has to do with politics, ideology or just entitlement mentality. This may sound silly, but it may be as simple as they thought they had every right in the world to climb what they want to climb, hike where they wanted to hike.
We have hikers and climbers in my own area who get totally up in arms if someone who has private property around here, with a shear granite face, don’t like the idea that these people want to traipse all around their property, with the chance of injury and so on.
I’ve actually had conversation s with these hiker and climbers, and they way they see it, they are entitled to hike and climb where they feel nature calls.
So, it’s not impossible that this crew was simply that naive.
I have no problem with you saying that the Shah tried to secularize. I have no problem with you saying that the clergy responded virulently, and that it started radicalization and violent resistance.
However, given that the Shah took power in a violent military coup, and given that the Shah’s ‘secularization’ regime was mainly about consolidating his own power, I don’t think the view you’ve transmitted here is in the least bit valid.
You can share the view all you want. Expect me to share mine right back at you.
It does get a bit weird when you’re referring not to the person’s argument, but the argument he’s relaying. The English language isn’t that great for those sort of tangled referents.
I don’t mind people talking out of their ass, but that’s stating something as much more than your or your neighbor’s opinion.
Again, it’s more properly read in context as “The overwhelming consensus [among expat Iranians] is that…”
Better idea…next time when you aren’t sure, just ask the author to clarify. Then you don’t look like a boob when you jump on them without justification.
It does get a bit weird when you’re referring not to the person’s argument, but the argument he’s relaying. The English language isn’t that great for those sort of tangled referents.
agree completely. but if we did this via teleconference, we’d have a whole different mess on our hands/
And I know several Iranian families that saw the Shah for what he was, a brutal dictator put in place to stop nationalization and return Iranian to the Western Sphere. Should we do a head count to decide who’s right?
Yes, much of this was in fact done in secret. Your friends are apparently wrong. No need to get pissy, and I’d suggest doing some research before trying to pass off a neighbor’s opinion as “overwhelming consensus” next time.
I see the misunderstanding.
I was referring to their consensus. The ten or so folks I have had that conversation with. Being that they lived there, I did come to have some faith in their opinions. Namely the current regime is no better for the nation than the Shah. I believe them on that. As to history, well views differ even given the established facts and time lines.
What made me pissy was to have it implied that I made up these conversations.
i was thinking more about how in the hell we could all manage to shut up long enough to listen to a single person talk…there are drawbacks to this medium, but one of the benefits is that we can all yell at each other at the same time without cutting each other off…
Wiki has it’s faults. No need to bob and weave in and out like a boxer. Wiki has plenty of perspective far more questionable than the facts listed. Fast and available does not necessarily equal accuracy.
i was thinking more about how in the hell we could all manage to shut up long enough to listen to a single person talk…there are drawbacks to this medium, but one of the benefits is that we can all yell at each other at the same time without cutting each other off…
well I like a fast thread with a couple subjects at once
That’s not true either, though. I know a large ex-pat Iranian community who loathe the Shah with every fiber of their being. I don’t know a single one who likes the Shah.
The current regime is probably just as bad or worse for the country as the Shah, sure.
However, the way the Shah came into power is just as bad, corrupt, and terrible as the way the current regime came into power. That is a really important point.
So the Islamists were simply reacting to our trampling of the great Iranian democracy and not taking advantage of the situation for the ends they so desired?
Fuck that’s stupid. No, the point is that our subverting democracy was bound both to backfire on us, and to prime those disenfranchised human beings for radicalization.
Um, do you think it’s just according to Wikipedia that there was a military coup?
Nice try, but really I refer to things far less clear. Like the Shahs motivations to secularize the country. Boy I sure made a liar out of myself with “I’m done”. Heh. Ducking in and out is just not my style of posting when time permits. I tend to give more weight in my mind to people who lived there than Wiki. Or the LA Times. Or Juan Cole for that matter.
I see the misunderstanding.
I was referring to their consensus. The ten or so folks I have had that conversation with. Being that they lived there, I did come to have some faith in their opinions. Namely the current regime is no better for the nation than the Shah. I believe them on that. As to history, well views differ even given the established facts and time lines.
What made me pissy was to have it implied that I made up these conversations.
O, in that case I apologize. I don’t doubt you had those conversations at all. I’ve heard Iranians somewhat split on the Shah. Really seems to depend on where you fell on the political and religious spectrum. If you supported the Shah, he wasn’t a bad guy. If you supported radical Islam, well being tortured by the SAVAK was horrible, and the new guys are pretty good. If you were a leftist who supported a non-align course for the country, well you got tortured by everybody until you got out.
My experience is largely with the 3rd group I’d say. Its extremely rare that I’ve heard anything good about the Shah, and its usually very limited praise. This is not an endorsement of the Mullahs tho. Most Iranians I know wish the country could have continued on its pre-1953 course.
I also know immigrants from the Republic of Vietnam who are totally unwilling to believe anything negative about Nguyễn Văn Thiệu. Doesn’t mean its not true, simply means their direct emotional involvement makes them unreliable sources. I’ve accepted this.
That’s not true either, though. I know a large ex-pat Iranian community who loathe the Shah with every fiber of their being. I don’t know a single one who likes the Shah.
I do…an OBGYN who was friends with the Iranian ‘nobility’…they fled in 79 to America and my best friend married a daughter…but this was a wealthy, prominent doctor who’s future was very insecure under the mad mullahs
And they ‘d probably file a lawsuit if they fell and were injured on the property.//
They would and they have, yet every spring, right on schedule, this hikers and climber will start trying to rally the locals to support their need to climb on anything and everything, private property or public land. There are laws in the country about climbing on certain open space rock cliffs, and then again, there are rock faces that the country does allow climbing on.
The problem is that these climbers are bored with climbing the same cliffs over and over, and they will argue that they should be allowed to climb anything they want. The will argue with the local business’ that it’s good for trade, good for business and so on.
Excepting, it isn’t good for the private land owners and the possible law suits that have ensued.
I really have talked personally to some of these people, and it like talking to a rock. They feel they are entitled to climb what they want.
An obsession to the point of being mentally unstable if you ask me.
Gaza…which should be occupied by the IDF til he is returned
I would respectfully disagree.
Imagine the casualties to both IDF members and civilians that effecting such an occupation would entail. Then imagine how it would go, day after day, as the residents engage in (inevitable) resistance. Imagine the video that would go out to the rest of the world. It would be a terrible mess for Israel.
Obviously, I am sympathetic to the young man, his relatives and countrymen. But killing a whole bunch of other people and causing all kinds of collateral damage wouldn’t free him and would harm Israel. Which is probably why they haven’t done this.
I have been following this on NPR, I have never heard them called anything but hikers…
That said, they trespassed on Iranian soil, the laws in Iran are different than here, hence, they are still incarcerated. It sucks, it is morally wrong from our point of view, but it is their right to handle their borders the way they feel they need to.
I want these people released, I want them to have at least the same access to lawyers that the US gives the folk at Gitmo, and I think the Iranians are wrong…but it’s not my call.
Its extremely rare that I’ve heard anything good about the Shah, and its usually very limited praise. This is not an endorsement of the Mullahs tho. Most Iranians I know wish the country could have continued on its pre-1953 course.
Okay. I know about thirty or so ex-Pat Iranians, including a Zoroastrian, Jews, and both Persian and Arab Iranians.
They all loathe the Shah with every fiber of their being. They loathe the current regime too. They would not be in the least bit happy to have the old regime back.
They would be happy if the democratically elected leader of Iran hadn’t been toppled in a CIA-backed military coup by the Shah.
That’s not true either, though. I know a large ex-pat Iranian community who loathe the Shah with every fiber of their being. I don’t know a single one who likes the Shah.
it may well not be true. just because it’s the consensus of his 13 friends doesn’t make it historical fact.
i was only objecting to the few folks who had a difficult time reading an introductory statement and then keeping it in mind as something to be implied in following posts, preferring instead to accuse him of taking great liberty with the truth.
the same error has bitten me in the past (not referring to you, or anyone in particular for that matter) so i diagnosed it and whipped out the scalpel/
Please ask your friends- Is Iran better off under the Theocracy? I got about 9 of ten that say no.
And yet we’ve got Bachmanns, Becks and Palins in this country who think the US should be a theocracy…only a good theocracy…with a “real god”…fucktards, all of ‘em.
Well, personally his comment stood for me because the history of the Shah and Iranian revolution was taught to me along the lines of: “Here’s what the US public was told, and here’s what actually happened”. He presented the first and not the latter.
Yes, and not being real familiar with the latter, I would like to have heard what it was. A comment of “bullshit revisionism” doesn’t give me much to go on.
… He wasn’t reformist forcing out Theocrats. He was essentially a puppet (Wester Intelligence services were instrumental in the coup and the setting up of his secret police) forcing out leftist/nationalist government.
The current regime is probably just as bad or worse for the country as the Shah, sure.
However, the way the Shah came into power is just as bad, corrupt, and terrible as the way the current regime came into power. That is a really important point.
They would and they have, yet every spring, right on schedule, this hikers and climber will start trying to rally the locals to support their need to climb on anything and everything, private property or public land. There are laws in the country about climbing on certain open space rock cliffs, and then again, there are rock faces that the country does allow climbing on.
The problem is that these climbers are bored with climbing the same cliffs over and over, and they will argue that they should be allowed to climb anything they want. The will argue with the local business’ that it’s good for trade, good for business and so on.
Excepting, it isn’t good for the private land owners and the possible law suits that have ensued.
I really have talked personally to some of these people, and it like talking to a rock. They feel they are entitled to climb what they want.
An obsession to the point of being mentally unstable if you ask me.
yup…same problems here with climbers…private, state, federal land, they seem to care not…different breed of cat
I’m not sure how much this has to do with politics, ideology or just entitlement mentality. This may sound silly, but it may be as simple as they thought they had every right in the world to climb what they want to climb, hike where they wanted to hike.
We have hikers and climbers in my own area who get totally up in arms if someone who has private property around here, with a shear granite face, don’t like the idea that these people want to traipse all around their property, with the chance of injury and so on.
I’ve actually had conversation s with these hiker and climbers, and they way they see it, they are entitled to hike and climb where they feel nature calls.
So, it’s not impossible that this crew was simply that naive.
It’s just that if you trespass in Colorado, the worst that will probably happen is some buckshot in your ass.
meh. i’m with Reine on this. disagree with RWC all you want, but the “lie” thing is just like peeing on a campfire - it doesn’t really achieve anything, and it smells awful…
Well, and simply making a claim of “it’s a lie” without giving the reasons why, doesn’t help anyone understand what the truth of the situation is.
Not sure what its like in the part of Iranian where they were arrested, but if the mountains are anything like those outside Tehran, you could pick an uglier spot:
Thank you. I could have been more clear. re: #201 darthstar
And yet we’ve got Bachmanns, Becks and Palins in this country who think the US should be a theocracy…only a good theocracy…with a “real god”…fucktards, all of ‘em.
Not sure what its like in the part of Iranian where they were arrested, but if the mountains are anything like those outside Tehran, you could pick an uglier spot:
By “backfire” , you mean giving Islamic radicals good propaganda with which they can use to absolutely shit on whatever democracy Iran had prior to the revolution, right? I really think you underestimate the strong arm of the Islamic revolution. We were not saints in the dealings with Iran, but the Islamic revolution was going to happen with out without our meddling.
It’s just that if you trespass in Colorado, the worst that will probably happen is some buckshot in your ass.
On the Iraqi frontier, things get…hairier.
But yeah, they may actually have been that naive.
the worst thing?…buckshot, eight 30caliber lead balls flying at you at 1850feet per second?….make you into burger real quick…buckshot is for killing stuff, dead
the worst thing?…buckshot, eight 30caliber lead balls flying at you at 1850feet per second?…make you into burger real quick…buckshot is for killing stuff, dead
I find it odd that there is very little outrage coming from the international community over the incarceration of a group of American hikers by the totalitarian Islamic republic of Iran just a few months after the whole thing with the Israeli navy seals and the flotilla sponsored by terrorists…
Read some of the comments on this thread about Jews in Iran. Living in Oklahoma I never had the pleasure to be meet a Jew or maybe it never came up and I did. I meet Jews in more numbers in Iran than I ever met in Oklahoma. My in-laws house is adjacent to a pretty large Jewish neighborhood. In fact, the neighbor had a Jewish girl that was hoping my husband would come back after going to school in the US and marry her. Whoops, didn’t work out. Unless your in prison, one thing positive about Iran is that they never stop anyone from leaving. The Jewish community in Iran is around 100,000.
Read some of the comments on this thread about Jews in Iran. Living in Oklahoma I never had the pleasure to be meet a Jew or maybe it never came up and I did. I meet Jews in more numbers in Iran than I ever met in Oklahoma. My in-laws house is adjacent to a pretty large Jewish neighborhood. In fact, the neighbor had a Jewish girl that was hoping my husband would come back after going to school in the US and marry her. Whoops, didn’t work out. Unless your in prison, one thing positive about Iran is that they never stop anyone from leaving. The Jewish community in Iran is around 100,000.
I grew up in a rural county in Northern California. Didn’t know any Jewish people. It wasn’t until I went away to college and realized that one of my best friends, whose last name was Steinberg, most likely wasn’t Catholic.
By “backfire” , you mean giving Islamic radicals good propaganda with which they can use to absolutely shit on whatever democracy Iran had prior to the revolution, right? I really think you underestimate the strong arm of the Islamic revolution. We were not saints in the dealings with Iran, but the Islamic revolution was going to happen with out without our meddling.
Only because you seem to need it to. Iran had a popularly elected government prior to the foreign backed 1953 coup, not a “whatever democracy.” Believing that the Iranians as a people would have somehow been incapable of valuing and maintaining that on their own says more about you than it does about them.
one of my wingnut correspondants has gifted me with a wonderful quote. after hearing him go on about the iniquities that the wealthy were undergoing, having to submit to a higher tax rate, i asked him why didn’t he look after himself for a change? after all, adam smith says that the result of all of us looking after our own self interest mysteriously leads to the benefit of all. his reply:
“If the wealthy don’t have rights then none of us do”
i am so remiss in forgetting the less fortunate. i mean, more fortunate. um, i mean more fortunate who suffer more because they have more to suffer with. oh hell, now i’m confused…
Only because you seem to need it to. Iran had a popularly elected government prior to the foreign backed 1953 coup, not a “whatever democracy.” Believing that the Iranians as a people would have somehow been incapable of valuing and maintaining that on their own says more about you than it does about them.
then you must have high hopes for the new democracy we installed in Iraq
Why was it an Islamic dictatorship that overthrew the Shah and not a pro democracy movement? Maybe we don’t know what would have happened without the coup in ‘53…. might we be in the same place?
i heard a report on the NPR last night about how the revolutionary guards in iran have taken over 1/3 of the economy
this was in regard to the attempt by the UN to squish them by imposing sanctions that will make it illegal for companies around the world to do business with guard owned businesses
Read some of the comments on this thread about Jews in Iran. Living in Oklahoma I never had the pleasure to be meet a Jew or maybe it never came up and I did. I meet Jews in more numbers in Iran than I ever met in Oklahoma. My in-laws house is adjacent to a pretty large Jewish neighborhood. In fact, the neighbor had a Jewish girl that was hoping my husband would come back after going to school in the US and marry her. Whoops, didn’t work out. Unless your in prison, one thing positive about Iran is that they never stop anyone from leaving. The Jewish community in Iran is around 100,000.
meh. i’m with Reine on this. disagree with RWC all you want, but the “lie” thing is just like peeing on a campfire - it doesn’t really achieve anything, and it smells awful…
There is no overwhelming consensus, it’s simply not true at all, in any way
i heard a report on the NPR last night about how the revolutionary guards in iran have taken over 1/3 of the economy
this was in regard to the attempt by the UN to squish them by imposing sanctions that will make it illegal for companies around the world to do business with guard owned businesses
hard targets…they don’t realize how stupid they are…we could bring Iran to it’s knees in two hours of whoop ass
Why was it an Islamic dictatorship that overthrew the Shah and not a pro democracy movement? Maybe we don’t know what would have happened without the coup in ‘53… might we be in the same place?
Well, at this point we’ll never know but I think a fair argument would be that the SAVAK had dealt with them brutally by the time of the revolution.
There are a lot more Iranian Jews in the US and Israel than in Iran in any case.
Could be but I wonder about western estimates that have anything to do within Iran. I asked my husband if the Jewish neighborhood had left and he said some had, but he did not go door to door checking but close Jewish neighbors are still there.
Why was it an Islamic dictatorship that overthrew the Shah and not a pro democracy movement? Maybe we don’t know what would have happened without the coup in ‘53… might we be in the same place?
i’m confused. i thought you were saying that you did know what would have happened…?
the consensus of his expat friends. you didn’t read his prior post, and so mischaracterized what he was saying.
I read his entire thread, the language was incorrect, it remains incorrect. if I know ten guys from Bolivia, and all ten guys say the same thing about Bolivia, I refer to them very clearly as “guys I know said this about Bolivia”
Overwhelming consensus implies that it is taken as historical fact, which is wrong.
I read his entire thread, the language was incorrect, it remains incorrect. if I know ten guys from Bolivia, and all ten guys say the same thing about Bolivia, I refer to them very clearly as “guys I know said this about Bolivia”
Overwhelming consensus implies that it is taken as historical fact, which is wrong.
I read his entire thread, the language was incorrect, it remains incorrect. if I know ten guys from Bolivia, and all ten guys say the same thing about Bolivia, I refer to them very clearly as “guys I know said this about Bolivia”
weird that i knew what he was talking about, then…amazing, in fact.
i’ll bet i know how many fingers you’re holding up right now.
I agree. Instead of invading Gaza Israel should just tell the average ordinary Gaza, “So sorry but we have to stop supplying food, water, electricity and medical care and all that other stuff we’ve been supplying you without recognition or charge for so long until Gilad is returned. Of course Israel wouldn’t do that either.
Personally I think he’s likely dead. I pray for him, but I think he’s dead.
Of course the Shah didn’t do that to the Islamists.
Not to get too Machiavellian, but when you take power in a coup the first group you target is those you took power from and those you fear the most. That was not the Islamists. They also gained support due to opposition to the Shah. If the people weren’t oppresed, what reason would they have to back a revolutionary movement?
In general I think its foolish to say that everything could have turned out the same when the 1953 coup was such a defining moment for Iran.
I agree. Instead of invading Gaza Israel should just tell the average ordinary Gaza, “So sorry but we have to stop supplying food, water, electricity and medical care and all that other stuff we’ve been supplying you without recognition or charge for so long until Gilad is returned. Of course Israel wouldn’t do that either.
Personally I think he’s likely dead. I pray for him, but I think he’s dead.
It will or has already come. It always does. There are some things Israel does not play nice about. There is a reason the some of the leadership of Hamas live in nursery schools and the like.
Of course the Shah didn’t do that to the Islamists.
Actually, a lot of times under the Shah what was actually an Islamicist action was blamed on the communists or Democratic types by the Shah— see Fakhr-Arai.
Did you read my clarification where I said the consensus was among those ten or so who I had the discussion with? My #171. I hope that clears that up.
I read it! I am defending my reaction, which was to your original post. I understand what you meant, but the language you used was wildly inappropriate and deceptive. Maybe it wasn’t your intent! But it was.
basically, the problem here is I would never use the term “overwhelming consensus” to refer to anecdotal opinions from friends or acquaintances. Language like that implies that you’re coming from what is accepted historical fact or overwhelming consensus among experts. And also you’re slamming wikipedia, which is way more footnoted, has way more sources, and is way more legitimate than your word of people you’ve talked to. People whose backgrounds we have no knowledge of.
Unless the consensus were about something very small and contained, that didn’t have, like a zillion historians studying it. Like say, a class we all took. Or a band I was seeing. “Overwhelming consensus at Berbati’s was that Wolves In The Throne Room rocked mightily.”
There’s constant right wing revisionist pushback and whitewashing about what the Shah did, it doesn’t fit the conservative narrative about how Iran is cosmically evil and has always been, and America is pure and never did a thing to upset them, like they’re S.P.E.C.T.R.E or Shadoloo. Everywhere a right wing blog or right wing talker talks about the Shah, they’re pushing that narrative, even though everything from reputable sources points to the contrary.
So I get sick of it! Because I’ve heard it a billion times. So now you know why it angered me. :)
I read his entire thread, the language was incorrect, it remains incorrect. .
The “entire thread” would include my #171, and my #270. My clarification of consensus and a direct reference to it. From my view, you read all but the very 2 of my posts intended to clear up what I meant. Coincidence?
Well darn it I just missed your 290 as I typed and PIMFed. Sorry. I do try to be clear. I used a bad phrase to describe the overwhelming majority of the folks I spoke to. Which would be my phrase if I was to start over.
I believe that you know people who have told you these things. I have friends who have told me much crazier things that they honestly believe. Full on conspiracy wackiness.
The language is the problem. This is politics, we know the power a couple of words can have over the entire framing of an event, or a fact, or an idea.
Well darn it I just missed your 290 as I typed and PIMFed. Sorry. I do try to be clear. I used a bad phrase to describe the overwhelming majority of the folks I spoke to. Which would be my phrase if I was to start over.
…
There’s constant right wing revisionist pushback and whitewashing about what the Shah did, it doesn’t fit the conservative narrative about how Iran is cosmically evil and has always been, and America is pure and never did a thing to upset them, like they’re S.P.E.C.T.R.E or Shadoloo. Everywhere a right wing blog or right wing talker talks about the Shah, they’re pushing that narrative, even though everything from reputable sources points to the contrary.
So I get sick of it! Because I’ve heard it a billion times. So now you know why it angered me. :)
Hope that clears stuff up!
So that’s what you’re mad about!
Look - everyone here has at some point not been as crystal clear as they could have been. When folks are being polite, maybe instead of reacting like RWC is one of the fools you’re so mad at, you could take the time and grant the courtesy of trying to clarify first. I believe RWC would be willing to extend that courtesy to you.
You bring up a whole new can of worms. How much were the soviets looking to destabilize Iran? Were they blameless? They sure are tight with dinnerjacket these days…..
I do tend to have confidence in those who were there, and a number of years to reflect. Crazy or not actually living it matters. Heck I lean of people who I know for this kind of information, as I do distrust American news media. Heh. At least my Iranian friends came by their opinions honestly, not just as a media corporate necessity.
Be well I do have some worpress work to do. My turn to merely lurk and work.
I believe that you know people who have told you these things. I have friends who have told me much crazier things that they honestly believe. Full on conspiracy wackiness.
The language is the problem. This is politics, we know the power a couple of words can have over the entire framing of an event, or a fact, or an idea.
You bring up a whole new can of worms. How much were the soviets looking to destabilize Iran? Were they blameless? They sure are tight with dinnerjacket these days…
Um.
The reason why we deposed the democratically elected leader of Iran and installed the Shah was that he was anti-Communist and pro-Western.
So in terms of that, yeah, the Soviets were pretty blameless in the CIA-inspired military coup in Iran.
You bring up a whole new can of worms. How much were the soviets looking to destabilize Iran? Were they blameless? They sure are tight with dinnerjacket these days…
I’m pretty sure they just drew a line between the fancy new airbases in Iraq and Moscow, and said “lets put as many S300s between there and here”. Personal theory.
Support of the Shah by Iranians here in the US supported the Shah in Iran. During the attempt of the Greens to revolt the monarchists here in the US were trying to say they had a hand in it. To bad there are not more Farsi speakers in the US because there are Farsi broadcasting stations in California and I think alot of Americans would be surprised what is being said.
I see where the misunderstanding is. No, they didn’t have the revolution to do whatever they wanted. But in the area of foreign policy, they quickly learned that they could do whatever they wanted. I was talking about realpolitik.
I’m pretty sure they just drew a line between the fancy new airbases in Iraq and Moscow, and said “lets put as many S300s between there and here”. Personal theory.
Of course the Soviets would have nothing to do with overthrowing pro western, anti communist leaders in oil rich countries with whomever was available, Islamic revolutionaries or not.
in other, more important news…AZ is thriving, despite all being racist borderbots…wtf is the left going to do now?, if the racist card won’t work, what will?
in other, more important news…AZ is thriving, despite all being racist borderbots…wtf is the left going to do now?, if the racist card won’t work, what will?
re: #311 Rightwingconspirator
So you haven’t yet read ’ The Help ‘//.
Already filming down the road a bit with Allison Janney, Bryce Dallas Howard, and Viola Davis. I’m already cringing at the voice-coached southern accents.
in other, more important news…AZ is thriving, despite all being racist borderbots…wtf is the left going to do now?, if the racist card won’t work, what will?
So you haven’t yet read ’ The Help ‘//.
Already filming down the road a bit with Allison Janney, Bryce Dallas Howard, and Viola Davis. I’m already cringing at the voice-coached southern accents.
Of course the Soviets would have nothing to do with overthrowing pro western, anti communist leaders in oil rich countries with whomever was available, Islamic revolutionaries or not.
For some reason, you’re talking about the fall of the Shah, when I’m talking about the coup d’etat that installed the Shah.
I am not sure what you mean… when did justice become a hyphenated word?
I mean that in the end civil rights weren’t just won with boycotts but also with laws being past.
Arizona should get slapped on the nose for what its done in my opinion for passing a law which tries to give it powers reserved for the federal government and place the cops in a helpless impossible situation….
I mean that in the end civil rights weren’t just won with boycotts but also with laws being past.
Arizona should get slapped on the nose for what its done in my opinion for passing a law which tries to give it powers reserved for the federal government and place the cops in a helpless impossible situation…
ooohh, without one mention of federal neglect?…is that fair? and BTW it’s not over yet…the feds case is not that strong….expect some major backpedal juju from both sides
I don’t deny that the CIA orchestrated the coup in ‘53. My original post was basically to say that with or without out involvement in the coup in ‘53, we would probably be in the same place with Iran.
I take issue with the undercurrent that if not for the CIA’s involvement in ‘53, the hikers would be sipping tea in Tehran. Probably overstated, but it seems like there is plenty of weight on the ‘53 coup and little toward the Islamic revolution or Soviet influence.
I don’t deny that the CIA orchestrated the coup in ‘53. My original post was basically to say that with or without out involvement in the coup in ‘53, we would probably be in the same place with Iran.
And that’s crazy.
I take issue with the undercurrent that if not for the CIA’s involvement in ‘53, the hikers would be sipping tea in Tehran. Probably overstated, but it seems like there is plenty of weight on the ‘53 coup and little toward the Islamic revolution or Soviet influence.
There’s weight on both, because both actually occurred, unlike your hypothetical world where only the Islamic revolution occurred.
I don’t deny that the CIA orchestrated the coup in ‘53. My original post was basically to say that with or without out involvement in the coup in ‘53, we would probably be in the same place with Iran.
I take issue with the undercurrent that if not for the CIA’s involvement in ‘53, the hikers would be sipping tea in Tehran. Probably overstated, but it seems like there is plenty of weight on the ‘53 coup and little toward the Islamic revolution or Soviet influence.
re: #347 SanFranciscoZionist
Where’s the quacking? I must have missed a link. I thought meditation usually involved a repeated sound or syllable, though.
ooohh, without one mention of federal neglect?…is that fair? and BTW it’s not over yet…the feds case is not that strong…expect some major backpedal juju from both sides
What would the feds be having to do for them not to be neglecting the boarder?
No, I was thinking of hypnosis…you know, hypnotizing people, and then making them do weird stuff…
I’m too confused now.
first they convince you that life is a ball of confusion you cannot deal with, then they enroll you in a meditation gig to teach you how to save yourself from stresses they manufactured….$$$$
re: #352 SanFranciscoZionist
I’ve undergone hypnosis ( years ago, fear-of-heights thing), and it was pretty tame. Nothing too weird. No noises involved except the therapist’s voice.
The phobia went away, although I’m not sure if the hypnosis had anything to do with it but hey…. my insurance paid.//
I’ve been a little better off the last 4 months. Obviously I been at the supermarket for 4 months now, average about 22 hours a week, mainly loaded on the weekends, usually having 3 days off in a row during the week (like right now). In the last 4 months, I have had three requests from Kaiser to make modifications to the patient visit survey application I wrote for them, so that has put about 1500 dollars in the bank (which is going to Paris in Jan. 2010, been three years since I’ve had any sort of vacation), and I’m picking a 5o bucks here and there with the sales of my handcrafted jewelry.
But I am still sending out resumes for full time programming work, 131 this year so far, all highly qualified for, not one bite, not even a initial phone interview.
So, things are better, no complaints, but it’s not due to any uptick in the economy or or even a trickle of things changing in the job market around Denver. It’s because I won’t let this shit put me down.
Why yes it did… had it been lowered with a bitchin’ set of rims and a killer sound system, the Shah might have been a little more fly with the peeps…
Now the king told the boogie men
You have to let that raga drop
The oil down the desert way
Has been shakin’ to the top
The sheik he drove his Cadillac
He went a’ cruisin’ down the ville
The muezzin was a’ standing
On the radiator grille
Quoted for emphasis. I hope everyone who can attend this Friday’s rally will do so.
It is all well and good to know of some injustice perpetrated by a far-away theocracy, but in order to provide these three noble young people with a better chance at eventual liberty, it is necessary to bring further attention to this ongoing incident so that those of our own representatives with the means to act will be compelled to do so. This Friday – the first anniversary of the hikers’ detention by Iranian forces – friends and family of the three Americans will be holding a rally in New York in an effort to prompt firmer action on behalf of Shane Bauer, Sarah Shourd, and Josh Fattal, who have languished in an Iranian prison for a year and who will continue to do so until such time as the Obama Administration steps up to the plate and does everything in its power to secure the liberty of three American citizens who’ve found themselves abducted by a theocratic and criminal regime.
The Shah’s son says he’ll never be a ruler like his dad. But if Iranians want him, he will give up his life in the US. But the Iranians have to take out the regime now and he waltz on back.
It’s cool that he interviewed Charles, but that doesn’t make him not a douche. Charles would eat his intellectual liver for breakfast, with some scrambled eggs.
in other, more important news…AZ is thriving, despite all being racist borderbots…wtf is the left going to do now?, if the racist card won’t work, what will?
“Fundamentally, the boycotts have been unsuccessful,” said Barry Broome, president of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council.
And
The Greater Phoenix Economic Council and Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce have launched a new website to build opposition to the boycotts. The site, “Stop AZ Boycotts,” features video testimonials from Arizona workers about how the boycotts have negatively affected their livelihoods.
In one, a waitress at The Arizona Center said canceled conventions have cut her earnings in half.
The statistics they claim as proof that the boycott has failed are from before the boycott. How dumb do they think their viewers are?
Dude who cares lol, it’s a message board for a reason. No one was talking about anything, I found it funny, lots of people post even more worthless stuff around the internet. No big deal.
I guess it was Pakistan, not Afghanistan/Iraq…still ridiculous.
wow. So you were completely wrong. But you have no problem having passed on a rumor you got over IM as fact, and now being totally wrong about it. And Alan Colmes still sucks.
It’s the weird, frothy anger you have for Mr. Colmes that’s weird, dude, not that you posted about it.
Especially when you were totally wrong about what you were going on about.
If beck wants to register Beck.com— well, I’d prefer it was the musical Beck, but if the blowhard one wants to do it, you know, that’s totally fine. Even though he’s a dick. Because he’s a famous dick, and y’know, it’d make sense for him to do it.
It’s the weird, frothy anger you have for Mr. Colmes that’s weird, dude, not that you posted about it.
Especially when you were totally wrong about what you were going on about.
If beck wants to register Beck.com— well, I’d prefer it was the musical Beck, but if the blowhard one wants to do it, you know, that’s totally fine. Even though he’s a dick. Because he’s a famous dick, and y’know, it’d make sense for him to do it.
Hell, if beck.com was open I’d buy it and change my name to beck.com.
It’s the weird, frothy anger you have for Mr. Colmes that’s weird, dude, not that you posted about it.
Especially when you were totally wrong about what you were going on about.
If beck wants to register Beck.com— well, I’d prefer it was the musical Beck, but if the blowhard one wants to do it, you know, that’s totally fine. Even though he’s a dick. Because he’s a famous dick, and y’know, it’d make sense for him to do it.
capitalism, right? i mean, i see Matrix’s point…liven up a slow thread with a random take…but i sorta celebrate capitalism even when a liberal makes use of it…feels sort of inconsistent otherwise/
Sadly, this isn’t the only example of the oil industry steering American foreign policy.
Actually it was the British oil industry. The CIA’s interest was in the Iranian prime minister’s game of patty-cake with the Communist Tudeh Party. His reasons for doing this were was really strange, since the Americans had forced the Soviets off of Iranian territory only five years earlier. Link
Iran owed its territorial integrity to the Americans, and Mosadeq had a strange way of showing gratitude and a complete lack of common sense.
I couldn’t even get my own name on Facebook, my daughter-in-law has it. LOL.
That’s when you need to get creative.
My daughter has friend whose FB name is Jane Loveisaddicting Doe (only she uses her real name instead of Jane and Doe).
capitalism, right? i mean, i see Matrix’s point…liven up a slow thread with a random take…but i sorta celebrate capitalism even when a liberal makes use of it…feels sort of inconsistent otherwise/
Charles himself posts random, bizarre posts and tweets….what’s the big fucking deal?….yak yak over nothing
That’s when you need to get creative.
My daughter has friend whose FB name is Jane Loveisaddicting Doe (only she uses her real name instead of Jane and Doe).
That’s when you need to get creative.
My daughter has friend whose FB name is Jane Loveisaddicting Doe (only she uses her real name instead of Jane and Doe).
My name on FB is my real name…i thought they allowed duplicates? Of course, i don’t FB much, so i’m probably missing something very basic!
the other piece is that its a rough-and-tumble place. If the guy does something blindly partisan like that he doesn’t have the right to kick when people jump him.
Its like when you or I post about atheism. We know whats coming, but we don’t complain about people coming back at us.
Hi Reine. I posted some comments on a days-old link of yours. Then I read the Wiki page and realized I pretty much wasted my time. Oh well.
Thanks for the link anyway. I learned from it.
Just went to what YOU linked at that site.
All I saw was the story I posted; it came in a tweet, and I thought it was interesting. I never saw that list of articles.
That’s when you need to get creative.
My daughter has friend whose FB name is Jane Loveisaddicting Doe (only she uses her real name instead of Jane and Doe).
The three hikers aren’t the only Americans being held by Iran. The Alaei brothers have now been held by Iran for more than 2 years - and were sentenced to 12 years in prison last October.
Their crimes? They were accused of seeking to foment a revolution. How? By attending AIDS and human rights conferences overseas. Did I mention that they’re AIDS researchers and doctors (one previously attended my alma mater)? (My coverage here).
Doing great!
The Roi will be going back to work in about 2 weeks - of course, he’ll have to drive to Corpus Christi and take a boat, but hey - it ain’t Nigeria, you know, so we’re happy!
Yes, they do. There are a shitload of Harry Gardener’s on the face of this Earth. The first one to sign up doesn’t ruin it for the rest.
well, i lean conservative more often than not, and domain names strike me somewhat like real estate. if you bought it fair and square, i’m not going to whine about it.
isn’t what you’re describing just…capitalism at work?
Doing great!
The Roi will be going back to work in about 2 weeks - of course, he’ll have to drive to Corpus Christi and take a boat, but hey - it ain’t Nigeria, you know, so we’re happy!
How are you?
I am well, thank you. Is the Roi on 14/14 towers by now?
The three hikers aren’t the only Americans being held by Iran. The Alaei brothers have now been held by Iran for more than 2 years - and were sentenced to 12 years in prison last October.
Their crimes? They were accused of seeking to foment a revolution. How? By attending AIDS and human rights conferences overseas. Did I mention that they’re AIDS researchers and doctors (one previously attended my alma mater)? (My coverage here).
well that’s one hell of a story…
time to act on behalf of our fellow citizens
Just went to what YOU linked at that site.
All I saw was the story I posted; it came in a tweet, and I thought it was interesting. I never saw that list of articles.
That was supposed to be a link to that comment by the admin., but got the front page instead. The admin. person scrubbed his own comment too. But your Page has it for posterity!
Yes it is man, I’m not caring about anything other than the name aspect. I just think it’s a weird choice, that’s all. Jeez.
Oh. I think it’s a great choice. Like Frank said, and you know i’m shooting straight when i am forced to agree with Frank (heh), i’d register my own first name in a heartbeat if it was available. and if someone else’s was available, i’d be very tempted to change my name…
By the way, for those of you on Mountain and Western time, check out PBS tonight. Just finished watching a Nova about “Who Shot Down Baron von Richtofen?”
i’m sorry. i read that about four times in an effort not to be pedantic, but i have croutons all over me…help!
Lololol fair enough.
I’m trying to remember now, wasn’t it Disney that tried to claim copywrite to a bunch of Grimm/HCA crap? Have a bit of a headache so I might be getting my stories crossed.
That’s when you need to get creative.
My daughter has friend whose FB name is Jane Loveisaddicting Doe (only she uses her real name instead of Jane and Doe).
AND, he’s been home since the first part of June, it’s time for him to get back to work. Driving me nuts …
A friend of mine has a husband who retired early. All he did was follow her around all day (he was a former corporate manager). She told him to get a hobby or she’d divorce him. He’s a pretty decent classical guitarist now.
By the way, for those of you on Mountain and Western time, check out PBS tonight. Just finished watching a Nova about “Who Shot Down Baron von Richtofen?”
So yeah my point is, You’d have to be an evil corporation like Disney to think you could make claim to something as generic as a first name, if somebody else got there first :)
I’m trying to remember now, wasn’t it Disney that tried to claim copywrite to a bunch of Grimm/HCA crap? Have a bit of a headache so I might be getting my stories crossed.
I actually came up with the naming rights to a successful local business, graduated from a world-renowned university, and am on my way to trying to make a shit-ton of money after graduate school so I can give half of it to the government.
A friend of mine has a husband who retired early. All he did was follow her around all day (he was a former corporate manager). She told him to get a hobby or she’d divorce him. He’s a pretty decent classical guitarist now.
The Roi will just go around the house turning out the lights I need to be able to see to do whatever it is I’m doing.
I bought the curly bulbs, because they last longer and use way less electricity, put out virtually no heat whatsoever, specifically to get him to quit it with the damned lights.
He still turns ‘em out. All of them. I’ll go into a room and start doing something and get aggravated, and then I realize I’m aggravated because I can’t see.
I actually came up with the naming rights to a successful local business, graduated from a world-renowned university, and am on my way to trying to make a shit-ton of money after graduate school so I can give half of it to the government.
Hooray for me!
Fantastic news, finally you’ll be able to move away from the Los Angeles that you hate so dearly and get that personality transplant we’ve always prayed for.
hehehehe.
Sure!
He also mows for the lady across the street, who is 85 years old and not well, and whose own kids and grandkids are nowhere to be seen.
I’m very close to the old lady…my dad died in 2004 and I was devastated…still have residual affects…I get up there 2-3 times a year
I live in the same city as my dad and I talk to him maybe once a month. We had some severe interpersonal problems while I was growing up and I just can’t quite get over them.
So, France has officially declared war against al-Qaida.
Has the U.S. done that? If not, should we?
I think it gives them too much importance. They’re a terror network, not a nation-state. And questions of conventions, rules of warfare, all that jazz, get that much dicier if we make a formal declaration of war.
I actually came up with the naming rights to a successful local business, graduated from a world-renowned university, and am on my way to trying to make a shit-ton of money after graduate school so I can give half of it to the government.
Hooray for me!
That must be the secret of your happiness and easy going attitude, huh Matrix? :D
I can’t tell you all how much I’m enjoying the David Niven version of the movie “Around the World in Eighty Days”.
So many amazing location shots: England, France, India, Spain, Thailand and Japan, and, of course, America.
And it makes me miss the British Empire. In a good way.
It was 1958. I think I saw it at the “Cinerama” theater in downtown Dallas. It was a magnificent movie with a great musical score. Now I’ll have to go check Netflix. Thanks
This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title and text already filled in.
Rep. Marsha Blackburn, tapped by Republican leadership to be the face of their new abortion ban legislation, comes up with a new--and completely bizarre--argument in favor of the legislation: REP. MARSHA BLACKBURN (R-TN): The bill has been amended. It does allow exceptions for rape and incest and the life of the mother, and that was the appropriate step to take. CRAIG MELVIN (MSNBC ANCHOR): ...
"We are breeding our own voters," Fischer said of conservatives, whereas liberals "have got to import them ... so that's why they're so enamored with illegal aliens and amnesty for them is they've got to find some way to get these people on the voter rolls to just maintain numerical parity with conservatives": YouTube More: Fischer: Liberals Support Immigration Because Conservatives Are Outbreeding Them ...
This isn't the only example of entrenched prejudice at the prestigious University of Chicago. The Black Youth Project revealed a Facebook page called Politically Incorrect Maroon Confessions, where more than 950 "confessions" from U of C students range from insensitive to flat out hate speech. One entry laments the "onslaught of black people invading UChicago." Another simply states, "Let's start a male movement fuck ...
America is the richest country on Earth. We have the most millionaires, the most billionaires and our wealthiest citizens have garnered more of the planet's riches than any other group in the world. We even have hedge fund managers who make in one hour as much as the average family makes in 21 years! This opulence is supposed to trickle down to the rest ...
Short but fascinating--I had a hard time choosing which paragraphs to include. The natural frequency of your head is a result of your skull’s size, density and shape, say scientists in a recent presentation at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, meaning that the vibrations of your skull are ever-so-slightly different than the person next to you. Measuring the natural vibrational frequency, ...
huffingtonpost.com Federal authorities have accused two upstate New York men of assembling a portable X-ray weapon they intended to use against opponents of Israel. Prosecutors say 49-year-old Glendon Scott Crawford, of Galway, and 54-year-old Eric J. Feight, of Hudson, have been charged with conspiracy to provide support to terrorists following a yearlong undercover investigation. Investigators say Crawford approached local Jewish organizations looking for people ...
This was not a fun article to read, but I think it's important--necessary even. Sometimes almost nothing is known to tell the stories of lives that were not lived, except a name. As Yishai Szekely - a doctor who serves as a reserve officer in an artillery unit - explains, in some families first-hand memories are passed down. There are photographs or books and ...
Here's a fascinating article my iPad's news aggregator discovered for me this morning: The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science.
It's a lot of things: identity, previous knowledge, fear and a pile of other factors. But we humans are more often rationalizing animals than rational ones.
Col Latifa Nabizada, the first female pilot in the Afghan air force, has battled prejudice, the Taliban and personal tragedy - but her ambitions for her young daughter soar even higher. My sister and I always talked about the stars and the universe. We talked about how aeroplanes were made and what it would be like to fly one - how it would feel ...
As much of the GOP strains to implement a post-2012 course correction, the party has found itself stymied over and over by what leaders describe as a tiny rump of ham-fisted pols with a knack for stumbling onto cable news. No matter what the party leadership is up to in a given month, there's almost invariably a back-bencher in the House of Representatives or ...
The Internal Revenue Service is about to pay $70 million in employee bonuses despite an Obama administration directive to cancel discretionary bonuses because of automatic spending cuts enacted this year, according to a GOP senator. Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa says his office has learned that the IRS is executing an agreement with the employees' union on Wednesday to pay the bonuses. Grassley says ...
Linda Harvey Likens Gay Acceptance among Youth to Believing the Sun Revolves the Earth Mission America’s Linda Harvey yesterday attacked the College Republican National Committee for acknowledging that the GOP’s anti-gay stances were alienating young voters, who overwhelmingly support gay rights, and asking the party to “welcome healthy debate on the policy topic at hand.” She compared such a move to a science teacher ...
While my anger and disbelief did not subside, I soon moved to sadness. Do you live in such a protected bubble that you would blame the victim of rape and excuse the perpetrators? Many have joined you in this victim blaming...unfortunately that is the culture in which we live. Your contribution to this culture as a role model for girls and women makes your ...
From feministing.com Turns out Reddit - home of pedophiles, ephibists and other "Jelly Belly" lovers now is putting out a book! Advice offered? Get CLOSE to her, damn it! To quote Rob Judge, “Personal space is for pussies.” I already told you that the most successful seducers are those who can’t keep their hands off of women. Well you’re not gonna be able to ...
Earlier this year, the Republican National Committee released a 100-page report detailing how the GOP needed to retrofit its agenda and soften its tone. But if Republican officials had wanted to save time, they could have issued a shorthand summary that read: Be less like Steve King. The Iowa congressman's outspoken conservatism embodies the kind of politics that, in the RNC's own words, alienates ...
President Barack Obama is expected to use his speech at the iconic Brandenburg Gate on Wednesday to renew calls for a reduction in nuclear weapons. It is not the first time the president has called for a reduction in stockpiles, but by addressing the issue in a major foreign speech, Obama is hoping to rekindle the issue, which was at the center of his ...
Reuters: But even the press in aggregate is not a friend to whistle-blowers, as its recent treatment of Snowden attests, what with the deep dives into his teen years (including photos), his education and employment history, his reputation as a loner and a “brainiac,” his pants-down hijinks, his online scribblings, his dancer girlfriend, his predilection for (in his own words) “post-coital Krispy Kremes.” Squeezing ...
Senior bankers guilty of reckless misconduct should be jailed, a long-awaited report on banking commissioned by the government has recommended. The Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards was set up by Chancellor George Osborne last year after a number of scandals involving the industry. Jail reckless bankers, standards commission urgesThe cross-party group's fifth report attacked the lack of accountability of bankers and also said some ...
LE BOURGET, France — Boeing Co. won major orders from five customers for a stretched-out version of its popular 787 Dreamliner jet at the Paris Air Show Tuesday, further evidence of a strengthening market for more expensive long-haul jets.Boeing announced the formal launch of its 787-10 program at the Paris Air Show on Tuesday and says it already has commitments for 102 jets from ...
Ever try to have a conversation with someone on drugs? It just doesn't work... -- Sometime during the summer of 1987, when asked by a DC reporter, "what are your feelings on the war on drugs?" His first response was to criticize the inherent invasion of privacy, followed by the above statement against drug use.