Another Andrew Breitbart Edited Tape?

Wingnuts • Views: 9,165

Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government site is promoting another outrageous outrage today, claiming that reporters for Alaska TV station KTVA were caught on tape plotting to damage Joe Miller’s campaign.

After Breitbart’s smear campaigns against ACORN and Shirley Sherrod using edited and out of context recordings, what are the odds that this is another bogus hit piece?

Greg Sargent has a response from KTVA general manager Jerry Bever, who says that’s exactly what it is.

“It’s unfortunate that this recording has happened. It’s unfortunate because it does not accurately reflect the journalistic standards of our newsroom and the garbled context will no doubt leave more questions than answers. The Miller campaign’s analysis of the recording is incorrect in many material ways ranging from personnel involved in the conversation, the interpretation of conversation snippets and the reported transcript of the perceived garbled conversation.

“While the recording is real, the allegations are untrue. The recording was the result of a cell phone not being hung up after a call was placed to Randy DeSoto, Joe Miller campaign spokesperson, Thursday afternoon to discuss Joe Miller’s appearance on that evening’s newscast. That phone call was placed near the end of a coverage planning meeting in our newsroom regarding that evening’s Miller rally in downtown Anchorage. The group of KTVA news personnel was reviewing potential “what-if” scenarios, discussing the likelihood of events at the rally and how KTVA might logistically disseminate any breaking news.

“The perception that this garbled, out of context recording may leave is unfortunate, but to allege that our staff was discussing or planning to create or fabricate stories regarding candidate Miller is absurd. The complete conversation was about what others might be able to do to cause disruption within the Miller campaign, not what KTVA could do.”

Jump to bottom

107 comments
1 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:15:00am

So they were just talking about how to get the news out if, theoretically, one of the candidates supporters turned out to be a child molester?

I'm so confused. Where can I actually see a transcript of this tape or something?

2 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:15:07am

Fool me once, fool me twice..............

3 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:15:11am

Breitbart using video out of context is as water is to wet.

4 jamesfirecat  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:16:32am

Breitbar edits another tape to prove something not true, this just in Pope still catholic, Bears still defficating in wooded areas!

5 Randall Gross  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:24:15am

You also have to wonder about the "cell phone voice mail" bit, that would be pretty hard to create a connect to from an in progress conversation without manually conferencing in from the campaign manager's phone. It's more likely that someone "pocket redialed" and hit voicemail after the conversation was over, or that the campaign manager illegally recorded the conversation. Most likely is a "pocket redial" after the original call was hung up.

6 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:25:51am
The full audio is only on the cell phone of Miller's campaign manager. Will the campaign release it? Also: Who edited the audio that Big Journalism posted?


Heh.

7 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:30:14am

Really this is not nearly as "outrage worthy" as the Brown "whore" staffer gaffe and that was not really any big deal either.

8 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:30:22am

Of course the wingnuts don't mind Breitbart's bogus videos...
KTVA: Yeah, that was us, but it’s not what you think

posted at 1:48 pm on October 31, 2010 by Ed Morrissey


KTVA’s explanation is absurd. What possible context can they put around the suggestion that they start looking for child molesters at a political rally in order to exploit that for their television coverage? That’s a “potential what-if scenario”?
...
Next up: will CBS management take action against their affiliate?
9 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:31:13am

The actual full recording and transcript of the tape will tell the tale. If it were an edited tape, I'm surprised KTVA did not say that outright in no uncertain terms. They would have every right to be outraged.

If the tape is unedited, no amount of spin will leave the reporters in question in a good light.

Right now it seems to be a 'He said, she said'.

The full KTVA statement seems to offer up both a defense and contrition about the whole matter.

"It's unfortunate that this recording has happened. It's unfortunate because it does not accurately reflect the journalistic standards of our newsroom and the garbled context will no doubt leave more questions than answers. The Miller campaign's analysis of the recording is incorrect in many material ways ranging from personnel involved in the conversation, the interpretation of conversation snippets and the reported transcript of the perceived garbled conversation..."

While Bever would not discuss any personnel issues linked with the recording, Bever says "Have we had internal discussions about the level of professionalism we need to bring to our conversations, internally and externally? Of course we have, this is a lesson to learn from.

Time will tell.

10 darthstar  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:31:28am

ABC News = Andrew Breitbart Conspiracy News.

11 Charles Johnson  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:32:52am

re: #8 Killgore Trout

Of course the wingnuts don't mind Breitbart's bogus videos...
KTVA: Yeah, that was us, but it’s not what you think

posted at 1:48 pm on October 31, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

It's amazing he can write that crap with a straight face as he's citing a story promoted by Andrew Breitbart.

12 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:35:13am

Big Journalism still claims ABC invited Breitbart for election night analysis....
Left Assails ABC Over First Amendment Respect

It should concern and disappoint all well meaning Americans engaged in political discourse that Erick Boehlert and his ilk at Media Matters seem so content to cause controversy where none should exist, push inaccuracy, and attempt to stifle fee speech, while lining their pockets with foreign billionaire George Soros’s money.

There is little if anything genuinely American in that. But that is today’s Left. It is who they are. It is what they do. And they do it all too consistently for it to be mistaken for anything other than what it actually is, disgraceful and un-American.

13 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:36:07am

I will say this- if the tape turns out to be edited, they ought to go after whoever did this with both guns blazing.

A mere two days before the election, this would take dirty politics and campaigning to new lows.

14 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:36:33am

re: #12 Killgore Trout

Big Journalism still claims ABC invited Breitbart for election night analysis...
Left Assails ABC Over First Amendment Respect

Ha, the irony of them bitching about Soros' being a foreigner when Rupert Murdoch, an Aussie is largely responsible for much modern conservative media.

15 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:38:21am

re: #11 Charles

I used to think that Breitbart was short sighted and wasn't considering the consequences of blatant lies. Like the ABC election night lie: Why would he lie about being hired for the night when he knew that he wouldn't be on TV election night? He knows the truth on this stuff is going to be exposed and he knows his audience just doesn't care. They'll continue to believe whatever he tells them.

16 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:39:57am

re: #14 HappyWarrior

I just noticed that was written by epic idiot Dan Riehl. Heh.

17 Reginald Perrin  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:40:02am

Breitbart should dress for Halloween as the little boy who cried wolf.

18 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:40:33am

re: #16 Killgore Trout

I just noticed that was written by epic idiot Dan Riehl. Heh.

Oh Dan Riehl who gets in imaginery fights with minorities on the DC Metro.

19 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:40:57am

re: #17 Reginald Perrin

Breitbart should dress for Halloween as the little boy who cried wolf.

Why, he won't get any candy, that's not a costume for him, it's what he is every day.

20 AntonSirius  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 11:46:02am

re: #12 Killgore Trout

Wow, that quote is just a big juicy softball right down the middle of the plate, isn't it?

"It should concern and disappoint all well meaning Americans engaged in political discourse that Roger Ailes and his ilk at Fox News seem so content to cause controversy where none should exist, push inaccuracy, and attempt to stifle fee speech, while lining their pockets with foreign billionaire Rupert Murdoch’s money.

There is little if anything genuinely American in that. But that is today’s Right. It is who they are. It is what they do. And they do it all too consistently for it to be mistaken for anything other than what it actually is, disgraceful and un-American."

21 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:00:13pm

The original transcript is way too garbled and distorted to make any actual sense of anyway. Why would the Miller people assume it was a conspiracy against them?

22 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:03:05pm

re: #21 Obdicut

The original transcript is way too garbled and distorted to make any actual sense of anyway. Why would the Miller people assume it was a conspiracy against them?

Better for business if it is.

23 Charles Johnson  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:04:01pm

Here's the Palin-thing chiming in, classy as always!

Twitter / @Sarah Palin: Corrupt bastards. CBS/medi ...

Corrupt bastards. CBS/media plot against Joe Miller before our Anchorage rally Thurs Kinda'what I've put up w for 2 yrs

24 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:04:04pm

re: #21 Obdicut

The original transcript is way too garbled and distorted to make any actual sense of anyway. Why would the Miller people assume it was a conspiracy against them?

Because George Soros-ACORN-Cloward/Piven-New World Order! That's why.

25 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:06:01pm

re: #24 Killgore Trout

Because George Soros-ACORN-Cloward/Piven-New World Order! That's why.

Can someone link me to the transcript?

26 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:06:11pm

re: #23 Charles

Here's the Palin-thing chiming in, classy as always!

Twitter / @Sarah Palin: Corrupt bastards. CBS/medi ...

I love how she brings herself in to it. Thanks SArah for proving yet again that you relish the role of victim. I know evil Katie Couric was really out to get you when she asked you about what supreme court cases you knew and what magazines you read. Seriously, Palin really seems to have a big problem with a free press.

27 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:08:48pm

re: #25 SanFranciscoZionist

It's in the first link in the post. Just one page of garble.

28 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:10:19pm

re: #25 SanFranciscoZionist

Can someone link me to the transcript?

Here is a transcript

TRANSCRIPT OF KTVA AUDIO FROM OCTOBER 28,
2010
FEMALE REPORTER: That’s up to you because you're the expert, but that’s what I would
do...I’d wait until you see who showed up because that indicates we already know
something...
[Laughter]
[INAUDIBLE]
FEMALE REPORTER: Child molesters...
MALE REPORTER: Oh yeah... can you repeat Joe Miller’s...uh... list of people, campaign
workers, which one's the molester?
[INAUDIBLE]
FEMALE VOICE: We know that out of all the people that will show up tonight, at least one of
them will be a registered sex offender.
[Laughter]
MALE REPORTER: You have to find that one person...
[INAUDIBLE]
FEMALE REPORTER: And the one thing we can do is ....we won’t know....we won’t know but
if there is any sort of chaos whatsoever we can put out a twitter/facebook alert: saying what
the... ‘Hey Joe Miller punched at rally.’
FEMALE REPORTER: Kinda like Rand Paul...I like that.
[Laughter]
FEMALE REPORTER: That’s a good one.

29 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:11:00pm

You know, I wasn't that big on George W BUsh and his administration but I never saw them whine about criticism the way Palin and the candidates she's been backing do. It's really pathetic. It's almost as if they want the media only to praise them. I particularly love Palin whining about the media because she's part of it as a contributor on Fox and someone who will have their own show soon. She's part of the same machine she hates.

30 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:11:28pm

So far, the transcript of what was said has been unchallenged.

KTVA is saying the transcript is not in context.

31 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:11:29pm

re: #27 Obdicut

It's in the first link in the post. Just one page of garble.

Thanks.

32 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:11:48pm

re: #28 researchok

I'd like to point out that "Joe Miller punched at rally" would actually be a new story that was favorable for Joe Miller.

Except for those who refuse to vote for a guy who can't bob and weave.

33 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:13:17pm

re: #32 Obdicut

I'd like to point out that "Joe Miller punched at rally" would actually be a new story that was favorable for Joe Miller.

Except for those who refuse to vote for a guy who can't bob and weave.

Not enough info yet.

34 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:13:26pm

re: #30 researchok

The transcript doesn't make any sense, though. I'm not even getting what the allegation is about the transcript; what are they claiming, specifically, that it shows?

35 Charles Johnson  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:13:28pm

re: #28 researchok

It reads like some journalists sitting around BS'ing about their jobs. This is going to turn out to be nothing at all. Don't get taken in by yet another Breitbart scam.

36 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:14:31pm

re: #35 Charles

"journalists try to one up each other with possible worst case scenarios.........."

Film at 11.

37 PhillyPretzel  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:15:02pm

re: #36 wozzablog
LOL

38 jaunte  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:16:10pm

re: #34 Obdicut

I think the general accusation is that the reporters were somehow plotting to emulate James O'Keefe to discredit Joe Miller.

39 Varek Raith  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:16:12pm

re: #34 Obdicut

The transcript doesn't make any sense, though. I'm not even getting what the allegation is about the transcript; what are they claiming, specifically, that it shows?

That they are planning the downfall of Joe Miller with these made up....
Nope.
Couldn't finish typing that with a straight face.

40 bratwurst  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:16:50pm

What did America ever do to deserve the Dallas Cowboys as its team anyway?

41 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:16:57pm

re: #35 Charles

At absolute worst, it appears the transcript says that they'd report on it if one of Miller's campaign workers was a sex offender. I can't really see anything else there that even rises to the level of anything that'd damage Miller.

I fail to see how this should make me gasp with horror.

Miller has shown that he has no vetting process, or an anti-vetting process; the thugs he hired as 'security' are a mega-creepy bunch who may have violated the laws about hiring active military personnel. I'm not sure why it'd be weird for reporters to see if any of Miller's other workers were also unsavory.

Was it a big ol' conspiracy for reporters to dig into Kwame Kilpatrick's associates, too?

42 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:16:59pm

re: #35 Charles

It reads like some journalists sitting around BS'ing about their jobs. This is going to turn out to be nothing at all. Don't get taken in by yet another Breitbart scam.

Oh no, I've learned my lesson.

As I have stated, the jury is still out on this deal.

In fact, the odds are in your favor, that this is some kind dirty trick if history is any indicator.

That said, time will tell.

43 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:17:39pm

re: #42 researchok

What is the jury attempting to decide, though? What is it that this transcript supposedly shows?

44 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:17:48pm

re: #40 bratwurst

What did America ever do to deserve the Dallas Cowboys as its team anyway?

The story actually is that Art Rooney, the owner of the Steelers was offered that title by NFL films but he said hell no we're Pittsburgh's team.

45 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:18:23pm

re: #43 Obdicut

What is the jury attempting to decide, though? What is it that this transcript supposedly shows?

I think the implication seems to be that they plan to accuse one of Miller's campaign workers of being a child molester, but I'm not totally sure.

46 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:18:39pm

re: #34 Obdicut

The transcript doesn't make any sense, though. I'm not even getting what the allegation is about the transcript; what are they claiming, specifically, that it shows?

They seem to be claiming it shows the active bias of the journalists in question.

47 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:18:45pm

re: #41 Obdicut

At absolute worst, it appears the transcript says that they'd report on it if one of Miller's campaign workers was a sex offender. I can't really see anything else there that even rises to the level of anything that'd damage Miller.

I fail to see how this should make me gasp with horror.

Miller has shown that he has no vetting process, or an anti-vetting process; the thugs he hired as 'security' are a mega-creepy bunch who may have violated the laws about hiring active military personnel. I'm not sure why it'd be weird for reporters to see if any of Miller's other workers were also unsavory.

Was it a big ol' conspiracy for reporters to dig into Kwame Kilpatrick's associates, too?

You know it's different with Kilpatrick because he's a libtard commie :) and Joe Miller represents everything right about America.

48 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:19:20pm

re: #46 researchok

They seem to be claiming it shows the active bias of the journalists in question.

But how? How does it show that? What about it shows that?

That's what I'm asking.

49 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:20:59pm

re: #48 Obdicut

Not showing deference to the superior morals and intellect of the Tea Party candidates.

50 Varek Raith  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:21:05pm

re: #46 researchok

They seem to be claiming it shows the active bias of the journalists in question.

Yeah, well, anything courtesy of Breadbasket is bullshit.

51 KronoGhazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:21:18pm

re: #35 Charles

It reads like some journalists sitting around BS'ing about their jobs. This is going to turn out to be nothing at all. Don't get taken in by yet another Breitbart scam.

Jeebus if any of my clients heard me ranting after they were being difficult....

Of course I still conduct my business with integrity after that. Librul reporters have no integrity and we gots the proof!

52 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:21:27pm

re: #45 SanFranciscoZionist

I think the implication seems to be that they plan to accuse one of Miller's campaign workers of being a child molester, but I'm not totally sure.

Well, at worst, it says that they need to find the person who IS a sex offender. It doesn't say they'll make it up out of nowhere.

53 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:22:17pm

re: #45 SanFranciscoZionist

I think the implication seems to be that they plan to accuse one of Miller's campaign workers of being a child molester, but I'm not totally sure.

I'm not sure of that either. It does seem as if Miller wants to point out an active bias against his campaign.

The lukewarm response by KTVA and remarks about 'lessons learned', are noteworthy- and appropriate. Clearly they are acknowledging a problem and clearly they are attempting to deal with that problem.

So far, KTVA is ahead. If the full transcript bears out Miller's charges, that will change.

54 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:22:28pm

Shit, as a sports reporter, we shoot shit like this amongst each other all the time.

55 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:22:32pm

re: #46 researchok

They seem to be claiming it shows the active bias of the journalists in question.

How does it do that, exactly?

56 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:23:30pm

And honestly I can see why reporters may be a little hostile to Miller's campaign after what happened with that one guy at the middle school with Miller's security goon squad.

57 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:23:30pm

re: #52 Obdicut

Well, at worst, it says that they need to find the person who IS a sex offender. It doesn't say they'll make it up out of nowhere.

Correct. But there's not enough there for me to actually understand what they're talking about.

58 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:23:58pm

re: #55 SanFranciscoZionist

How does it do that, exactly?

According to the provided transcript, they appear to be looking for anyone with a sex crime past to show up at a rally so they can point him/her out as Miller supporter.

59 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:24:09pm

re: #53 researchok

I'm not sure of that either. It does seem as if Miller wants to point out an active bias against his campaign.

The lukewarm response by KTVA and remarks about 'lessons learned', are noteworthy- and appropriate. Clearly they are acknowledging a problem and clearly they are attempting to deal with that problem.

So far, KTVA is ahead. If the full transcript bears out Miller's charges, that will change.

Change what? That most reasonable people view Miller as a tool and full blown jackass? If anything, all this does is expose what people talk about behind closed doors.

Joe Millers and asshole, news at 11.

60 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:25:55pm

re: #43 Obdicut

What is the jury attempting to decide, though? What is it that this transcript supposedly shows?

We need access to the entire audio recording and the entire transcript.

Until we have that, this is all suspect.

61 Varek Raith  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:25:59pm

re: #58 researchok

According to the provided transcript, they appear to be looking for anyone with a sex crime past to show up at a rally so they can point him/her out as Miller supporter.

The transcript provided by Breitbart?

62 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:26:17pm

re: #59 Jeff In Ohio

Change what? That most reasonable people view Miller as a tool and full blown jackass? If anything, all this does is expose what people talk about behind closed doors.

Joe Millers and asshole, news at 11.

This isn't about Miller.

63 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:26:22pm

re: #58 researchok

According to the provided transcript, they appear to be looking for anyone with a sex crime past to show up at a rally so they can point him/her out as Miller supporter.

I don't hear that. I hear reporters sitting around and making jokes. Having been in a few newsrooms, I find this utterly unremarkable.

64 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:26:22pm

re: #58 researchok

According to the provided transcript, they appear to be looking for anyone with a sex crime past to show up at a rally so they can point him/her out as Miller supporter.

I can read that into what they're saying, it just doesn't make an enormous amount of sense to me.

65 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:27:10pm

re: #61 Varek Raith

The transcript provided by Breitbart?

Yes- and that is why I keep saying until we get the entire recording and an entire transcript, this is all suspect.

66 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:27:26pm

re: #64 SanFranciscoZionist

I can read that into what they're saying, it just doesn't make an enormous amount of sense to me.

No argument here.

67 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:27:28pm

re: #61 Varek Raith

The transcript provided by Breitbart?

That's the rub. He and his pupils have not exactly shown good ethics in the recent past. I'd be more concerned about this tape if I hadn't seen the way the ACORN tapes were cut and manipulated, and the way the Sherrod thing was carefully taken out of context.

68 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:27:51pm

re: #62 researchok

This isn't about Miller.

It's much ado about nothing.

69 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:28:13pm

re: #60 researchok

I'm just not sure of "Hey, if there are any sex offenders working for Miller as campaign workers, we could report on that" rises to the level of some sort of dishonest conspiracy.

Even if it was said in seriousness, which it really doesn't appear to have been.

I mean, this is the Brietbart-provided info, which really should mean this is the most damning crap they've got-- and it's nothing.

70 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:28:24pm

re: #63 Jeff In Ohio

I don't hear that. I hear reporters sitting around and making jokes. Having been in a few newsrooms, I find this utterly unremarkable.

Well, I don't definitively hear that.

Like I said, time will tell.

71 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:29:16pm

re: #67 SanFranciscoZionist

That's the rub. He and his pupils have not exactly shown good ethics in the recent past. I'd be more concerned about this tape if I hadn't seen the way the ACORN tapes were cut and manipulated, and the way the Sherrod thing was carefully taken out of context.

Precisely, Breitbart isn't exactly a bastion of honesty. He seems to approach politics with a by any means necessary type mentality which if it means screwing people over to get his candidates to win or his causes to do well, he will drag people through the mud.

72 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:30:24pm

re: #69 Obdicut

I'm just not sure of "Hey, if there are any sex offenders working for Miller as campaign workers, we could report on that" rises to the level of some sort of dishonest conspiracy.

Even if it was said in seriousness, which it really doesn't appear to have been.

I mean, this is the Brietbart-provided info, which really should mean this is the most damning crap they've got-- and it's nothing.

Like I keep saying, we just don't have enough info yet.

Like you, I'm suspect of anything Breibart might report on, so in that sense, I believe there is a good chance this is all BS.

Like the Shirley Sherrod case, I just want to see the whole shebang. I don't think that is unreasonable.

73 efuseakay  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:31:16pm

re: #62 researchok

This isn't about Miller.

No. It really is. But the likes of Breitbart want you to believe otherwise.

74 Varek Raith  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:31:47pm

re: #65 researchok

Yes- and that is why I keep saying until we get the entire recording and an entire transcript, this is all suspect.

Sorry.
Breitbart is a proven liar. I'll take the side of whomever he's smearing anyday.
He's edited several things in the past to look far worse than they really are.

75 KronoGhazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:31:50pm

re: #71 HappyWarrior

Precisely, Breitbart isn't exactly a bastion of honesty. He seems to approach politics with a by any means necessary type mentality which if it means screwing people over to get his candidates to win or his causes to do well, he will drag people through the mud.

In it's essence, 'the ends justify the means' which is a classic conservative criticism of liberalism and communism.

76 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:34:05pm

re: #72 researchok

Well, I'm just confused because this latest Brietbart smear starts out with nothing. It's alleging nothing from the get go. It's just a random transcript of reporters talking that, if you already think conspiracies exist in the media, you might think they were talking about some sort of conspiracy. Otherwise, at worst, if you take what they said dead seriously, they're talking about investigating to see if there are any sex offenders working for Miller.

Since there isn't any actual allegation of wrongdoing that makes any sense, there doesn't seem to be anything at all to the story. And since it's coming from Brietbart, it seems really unlikely there will be anything more.

77 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:35:26pm

re: #74 Varek Raith

Sorry.
Breitbart is a proven liar. I'll take the side of whomever he's smearing anyday.
He's edited several things in the past to look far worse than they really are.

That's why I won't give Breitbart any credibility. He is the author of his own irrelevance. The issue is bigger than Breitbart. The first KTVA response is indicative of that. As far as I am concerned, they and not Miller campaign are ahead in the credibility game.

I just want to hear the entire unedited audio and read the unedited transcript of the entire event.

I am mystified as to why some people are upset by that.

78 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:36:59pm

re: #77 researchok

I don't think anyone's upset by it.

I'm confused by what you think the unedited audio and transcript would clear up, since there doesn't appear to be an actual allegation in the first place.

It's not 'upsetting' me. It is confusing me.

79 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:37:16pm

OT: RedStateUpdate reviews scary horror movies for Halloween

I find these guys amusing at all times, but that may be because approximately half of my family were exactly like them, without exaggeration. In fact, Jackie and Dunlap are kinda mild facsimiles.

80 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:37:43pm

re: #76 Obdicut

Well, I'm just confused because this latest Brietbart smear starts out with nothing. It's alleging nothing from the get go. It's just a random transcript of reporters talking that, if you already think conspiracies exist in the media, you might think they were talking about some sort of conspiracy. Otherwise, at worst, if you take what they said dead seriously, they're talking about investigating to see if there are any sex offenders working for Miller.

Since there isn't any actual allegation of wrongdoing that makes any sense, there doesn't seem to be anything at all to the story. And since it's coming from Brietbart, it seems really unlikely there will be anything more.

All I want to hear and read is the entire audio/transcript. Charges were made, a response was issued.

Why is that so problematic?

81 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:39:25pm

re: #78 Obdicut

I don't think anyone's upset by it.

I'm confused by what you think the unedited audio and transcript would clear up, since there doesn't appear to be an actual allegation in the first place.

It's not 'upsetting' me. It is confusing me.


As I have noted before, odds are against the Miller allegations, given past performance, so to speak.

An entire audio/transcript would provide context.

82 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:41:00pm

re: #75 BigPapa

In it's essence, 'the ends justify the means' which is a classic conservative criticism of liberalism and communism.


Yeah ironically enough huh. Breitbart really should have no crediblity yet I see Palin eating his latest crap up and calling these reporters bastards. So funny since she called the Dr. Laura incident the left's Shirley Sherrod yet here we see her buying shit peddled by the man who made Sherrodgate up.

83 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:41:02pm

re: #77 researchok

I just want to hear the entire unedited audio and read the unedited transcript of the entire event.

I am mystified as to why some people are upset by that.


You're never gonna get it. Breitbart never released the ACORN tapes either. The only reason they got out because some DA in California released them as part of a criminal investigation. Breitbart knows what he's doing and if he was interested in honesty he would have published the complete tapes already.

84 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:41:53pm

re: #81 researchok

But-- this is the point I'm trying to make-- the transcript as they released it, as Brietbart released it, shows absolutely nothing. That is their proof-- and as it stands, it doesn't even need any counterproof, because it doesn't show anything.

It's as if they recorded some reporters saying, "Let's dig deep into the Miller campaign and see if he has any other unsavory assholes working for him," and said, "See! They're biased against him!", or if they released a transcript of reporters saying, "If someone punches someone at a MIller rally, let's put out a tweet on that" as "OMG, bias!"

The allegations themselves make no sense, so I don't see what actually needs proving or disproving. That's what the disconnect here is.

85 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:42:28pm

re: #83 Killgore Trout

You're never gonna get it. Breitbart never released the ACORN tapes either. The only reason they got out because some DA in California released them as part of a criminal investigation. Breitbart knows what he's doing and if he was interested in honesty he would have published the complete tapes already.

Good point.

I wonder if Miller will release the entire audio.

86 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:42:43pm

Brietbart tweets...


Missing 'context' was there all along; Sherrod said Obama KNEW SHE HELPED THAT WHITE FARMER; She was fired for other reasons. Developing...


Here we go again.

87 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:42:52pm

re: #24 Killgore Trout

Jeremy Piven?

88 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:43:56pm

re: #87 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Jeremy Piven?

Probably. I suspect Gearge Soros is somehow involved. Maybe the Black Panthers.

89 HappyBenghazi  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:44:05pm

re: #86 Killgore Trout

Brietbart tweets...


Here we go again.

Is there anything positive about Andrew Breitbart? Really his whole existence seems to be about ruining liberals. Honestly, if I were a conservative, I'd hate him since people like him would make "my" side look like a bunch of dishonest douchebags.

90 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:45:02pm

re: #89 HappyWarrior

He generally keeps quiet about being Jewish, which I appreciate.

91 Wozza Matter?  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:45:18pm

re: #89 HappyWarrior

Is there anything positive about Andrew Breitbart? Really his whole existence seems to be about ruining lives. Honestly, if I were a conservative, I'd hate him since people like him would make "my" side look like a bunch of dishonest douchebags.

fify

92 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:46:24pm

re: #89 HappyWarrior

Is there anything positive about Andrew Breitbart?


Not that I can think of.

93 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:47:56pm

re: #84 Obdicut

But-- this is the point I'm trying to make-- the transcript as they released it, as Brietbart released it, shows absolutely nothing. That is their proof-- and as it stands, it doesn't even need any counterproof, because it doesn't show anything.

And that is exactly what I have been saying all along.

Charges were leveled- serious charges. It is up to Miller, et al, to back up those charges. Only a full audio and transcript can do that.

If they don't, they need to be gone after with both barrels blazing, as I said earlier. If the charges are fraudulent, they need to be excoriated.

It seems to me that anyone who has it in for Breitbart would want the same thing.

94 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:48:25pm

re: #92 Killgore Trout

Not that I can think of.

He supports his local dry cleaners.

95 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:48:40pm

Does anyone else get kinda pissed off that these people make a living from actively working to fuck up what's left of American society by constantly setting people at each others' throats?

96 researchok  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:49:08pm

re: #90 Obdicut

He generally keeps quiet about being Jewish, which I appreciate.

He is as Jewish as you are John Bircher.

97 Reginald Perrin  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:49:46pm

re: #89 HappyWarrior

Is there anything positive about Andrew Breitbart?

He doesn't have a twin brother.

98 Killgore Trout  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:51:09pm

Sarah Palin: We Have Video of "Corrupt Bastards" In Media Conspiring Against Joe Miller


Fox News, of course.
99 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:54:34pm

re: #93 researchok

And that is exactly what I have been saying all along.

Charges were leveled- serious charges. It is up to Miller, et al, to back up those charges. Only a full audio and transcript can do that.

Except that they're claiming what they've released already backs up those charges. That's my point. They've already shown what they're saying is proof-- and it's not. So, to me, they should be being excoriated right now.

100 Gus  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:55:00pm

Latest poll, from Dittman Research:

2010 U.S. Senate
37% Murkowski (write-in)
27% Miller
23% McAdams
13% Other / Unsure

Sounds like desperation on the part of the Miller campaign. This is also after Dan Riehl promoted by way of Big Government the flooding of write in candidates last week.

I think Big Government is reaching the point where it calls for scrutiny from the FEC. They are no longer a mere blog and have become deeply entwined within the election process. At the very least they are a major astroturfing organization.

101 albusteve  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:56:44pm

re: #95 negativ

Does anyone else get kinda pissed off that these people make a living from actively working to fuck up what's left of American society by constantly setting people at each others' throats?

somehow, I think it's a small fraternity of shit stirers and their minions, who instigate the faux rage...most voters probably could care less, but it does pay well when they have an audience drooling over every bitch, whore, bastard and dirty allegation...it's a business

102 Obdicut  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:57:20pm

re: #97 Reginald Perrin

He doesn't have a twin brother.

Ah, maybe he does, though-- and Andrew is the evil twin.

103 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:57:24pm

Speaking of media?

CBS just walked out of the Cowboy's game.

104 Varek Raith  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 12:59:12pm

re: #103 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Speaking of media?

CBS just walked out of the Cowboy's game.

Lol.

105 Varek Raith  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 1:00:20pm

re: #103 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Speaking of media?

CBS just walked out of the Cowboy's game.

Jaguars 35
Cowboys 10

GO COWBOYS!

106 webevintage  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 1:21:57pm

re: #53 researchok

The lukewarm response by KTVA and remarks about 'lessons learned', are noteworthy- and appropriate. Clearly they are acknowledging a problem and clearly they are attempting to deal with that problem.

I'm assuming that the "lesson learned" is to make sure your damn phone is turned off before you begin a bullshitting session about the latest moron running for office.

107 Jeff In Ohio  Sun, Oct 31, 2010 2:51:20pm

re: #93 researchok

And that is exactly what I have been saying all along.

Charges were leveled- serious charges. It is up to Miller, et al, to back up those charges. Only a full audio and transcript can do that.

If they don't, they need to be gone after with both barrels blazing, as I said earlier. If the charges are fraudulent, they need to be excoriated.

It seems to me that anyone who has it in for Breitbart would want the same thing.

So it is about Miller.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Once Praised, the Settlement to Help Sickened BP Oil Spill Workers Leaves Most With Nearly Nothing When a deadly explosion destroyed BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico, 134 million gallons of crude erupted into the sea over the next three months — and tens of thousands of ordinary people were hired ...
Cheechako
3 hours ago
Views: 44 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
4 days ago
Views: 160 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1