GOP’s ‘Protect Life Act’ Says Hospitals Can Let Women Die
It was bad enough when they tried to redefine rape, but a new bill introduced by Republican Congressman Joe Pitts with the Orwellian title “Protect Life Act” is truly obscene.
This bill changes the requirement that emergency room doctors must try to save every patient, by creating a special exception for pregnant women — an exception that allows doctors and hospitals to let pregnant women die if saving them requires an abortion. The hospital would not be required to do anything at all; they would not even have to facilitate a transfer.
That’s right. According to the “pro-life” GOP, an unborn fetus is a person — but a woman is not.
TPM has a good summation of this deeply misogynistic legislation:
A bit of backstory: currently, all hospitals in America that receive Medicare or Medicaid funding are bound by a 1986 law known as EMTALA to provide emergency care to all comers, regardless of their ability to pay or other factors. Hospitals do not have to provide free care to everyone that arrives at their doorstep under EMTALA — but they do have to stabilize them and provide them with emergency care without factoring in their ability to pay for it or not. If a hospital can’t provide the care a patient needs, it is required to transfer that patient to a hospital that can, and the receiving hospital is required to accept that patient.
In the case of an anti-abortion hospital with a patient requiring an emergency abortion, ETMALA would require that hospital to perform it or transfer the patient to someone who can. (The nature of how that procedure works exactly is up in the air, with the ACLU calling on the federal government to state clearly that unwillingness to perform an abortion doesn’t qualify as inability under EMTALA. That argument is ongoing, and the government has yet to weigh in.)
Pitts’ new bill would free hospitals from any abortion requirement under EMTALA, meaning that medical providers who aren’t willing to terminate pregnancies wouldn’t have to — nor would they have to facilitate a transfer.
The hospital could literally do nothing at all, pro-choice critics of Pitts’ bill say. “This is really out there,” Donna Crane, policy director at NARAL Pro-Choice America told TPM. “I haven’t seen this before.”
Crane said she’s been a pro-choice advocate “for a long time,” yet she’s never seen anti-abortion bill as brazenly attacking the health of the mother exemption as Pitts’ bill has.