1 Kragar  Fri, Jul 29, 2011 10:57:15pm

Debbie Schussel is a hate filled bitch.

2 Dante41  Fri, Jul 29, 2011 10:59:15pm

But all Muslims can still be held accountable for the actions of an extremist minority, right Fox? Good to hear.

3 Slumbering Behemoth Stinks  Fri, Jul 29, 2011 10:59:26pm

If Fox News really wanted to shut down John Stewart, all they would have to do is close up shop and quit giving him and his writers such great comedic fodder.

4 Digital Display  Fri, Jul 29, 2011 11:01:11pm

That was a good video...

5 Dante41  Fri, Jul 29, 2011 11:05:09pm

...and the award for "Stating the Obvious" goes to...me.

6 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Jul 29, 2011 11:07:20pm

re: #4 HoosierHoops

That was a good video...

Yes, it was.

7 Digital Display  Fri, Jul 29, 2011 11:10:11pm

re: #6 Dark_Falcon

Yes, it was.

What's up? I love this compressed NFL free agency.. It's hard to keep up with who is going where.. They should do this every year...It's fast and furious

8 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:37:33am

I looked through the names released thus far by Norway.

I am descended of a Johansen family in Norway. A Ronja Soettar Johansen is among the dead. In a country of just 5 million, this can be worrisome.

Also among the dead, 3 Muslims. And Samson with his pages is beginning to tick me off. He seems to be delighting in bashing Norway.

9 freetoken  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:42:13am
10 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:42:35am

re: #2 Dante41

But all Muslims can still be held accountable for the actions of an extremist minority, right Fox? Good to hear.

Because we are individuals made in the image of the person who originated everything in the universe, we hate the ungodly, satanic, communist idea of group rights. Unless it's rights for our group.

Other people, like you know, Muslims and stuff, they've been eternally cursed by the Lord for their disbelief in His Son™! So how dare anyone suggest that group of people be afforded equal treatment, on par with us individuals! That's not fair!

11 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:44:36am

re: #8 ProLifeLiberal

There is a second Johansen in there: Rolf Christopher Johansen Perreau.

I'm beginning to think my family may not have escaped this. Will be talking to Grandfather about this tomorrow.

And the tribute site to one of the victims has this link:

It makes me queasy. Some of the responses are horrible.

12 Digital Display  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:05:27am

After about a month of being spun up by the debt debate...My brain hurts..And really it's the 2 minute warning..So stay tuned lizards
I may have reached this point...

13 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:07:27am

re: #8 ProLifeLiberal

And continuing to look through, I'm noticing them come from all over Norway.

Also, 1 of the Muslims is from Turkey (close ally of Norway) and another is an Iraqi refugee. Two have last names from Muslim areas.

So this guy killed 4 Muslims. And Turkey is going to be massively pissed.

14 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:17:48am

I see the LGF Geller posting was quoted at Hurry up Harry. Good.

15 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:22:14am

There is an idiot commenter there, scroll down to "armaros":

[Link: hurryupharry.org...]

He quotes SB and Gus. What a moron.

16 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:25:54am

re: #1 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Debbie Schussel is a hate filled bitch.

While I agree with the general sentiment, the b-word is inherently wrong, IMHO. It is used because she is a female.

17 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:29:54am

re: #15 Sergey Romanov

There is an idiot commenter there, scroll down to "armaros":

[Link: hurryupharry.org...]

He quotes SB and Gus. What a moron.

His excuse is brilliant:

I don’t think Geller owes an explanation for this. It is logical to do this when large numbers of people are determined to attack you for the act of an evil coward terrorist madman.
18 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:33:48am

re: #16 Sergey Romanov

While I agree with the general sentiment, the b-word is inherently wrong, IMHO. It is used because she is a female.

No, bitch is accurate, and not even strong enough a word for her.

Debbie Schlussel: Slain Norwegian Teens Were ‘Hateful, Privileged Brats’

19 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:34:42am

re: #18 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

No, bitch is accurate, and not even strong enough a word for her.

Debbie Schlussel: Slain Norwegian Teens Were ‘Hateful, Privileged Brats’

It's sexist, Kragar.

20 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:39:09am

re: #19 Sergey Romanov

It's sexist, Kragar.

Asshole, douchebag, and shithead just don't have the same ring though.

21 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:50:35am

re: #20 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Asshole, douchebag, and shithead just don't have the same ring though.

I know, but maybe exactly because they don't have the added ... element.

How about: Shitstain on humanity? Debbie Goebbels?

22 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:54:21am

re: #21 Sergey Romanov

I know, but maybe exactly because they don't have the added ... element.

How about: Shitstain on humanity? Debbie Goebbels?

We're all slaves to the dictates of the grammatical hegemony forced upon us. I'll stand by my original statement. I was forced to by the ruling elite. They made me do it.

23 freetoken  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:54:53am
24 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 1:57:01am

re: #23 freetoken

[Video]

25 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:02:43am

The Taling POint (TM) is this:

Jesus forbids killing, therefore anyone committing mass murder in his name is not a True Christian (TM)

But Muhammad demands that his followers conquer and kill, therefore any Muslim who practices his religion quietly and peacefully is not a True Muslim (TM).

That should end all further argument as to who is a terrorist and who is a deranged loner nutbag.

/

26 CuriousLurker  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:02:59am

Viva la multi-culti! Mehndi Party with Western women who appear to be—*gasp*—enjoying themselves, traitors that they are. (I couldn't embed it; you have to watch it on YouTube.)

*waves @ Sergey*

27 CuriousLurker  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:04:48am

re: #18 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

No, bitch is accurate, and not even strong enough a word for her.

Debbie Schlussel: Slain Norwegian Teens Were ‘Hateful, Privileged Brats’

Well it IS insulting to female dogs in this case. /

28 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:06:36am

re: #26 CuriousLurker

Viva la multi-culti! Mehndi Party with Western women who appear to be—*gasp*—enjoying themselves, traitors that they are. (I couldn't embed it; you have to watch it on YouTube.)

*waves @ Sergey*

OH NO! I ALMOST FELT MY ARYAN COOTIES LEAVING MY BODY UPON SEEING THIS ABOMINATION!

Very cool, CL.

29 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:06:58am

Bus driver song

30 CuriousLurker  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:07:42am

re: #28 Sergey Romanov

Very cool, CL.

Nice music tonight.

31 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:08:47am

re: #20 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Asshole, douchebag, and shithead just don't have the same ring though.

It doesn't have the same ring because she's female, though.

32 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:12:24am

re: #21 Sergey Romanov

I know, but maybe exactly because they don't have the added ... element.

How about: Shitstain on humanity? Debbie Goebbels?

I once called her Sw&stika Girl on my blog. But I did stop doing it because it's just not right. No matter how far right off the cliff someone goes, it's wrong to put N#zi terminology on Jewish people, period. At least in my book.

So... dumb, stupid, ignorant conservative-supremacist, hair-on-fire bigot will suffice for me lol

33 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:13:05am

There was one big error in calling him "fundamentalist", but he clearly identified himself with Christianity.

34 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:15:52am

re: #33 ralphieboy

There was one big error in calling him "fundamentalist", but he clearly identified himself with Christianity.

I think "conservative Christian-supremacist" works. An LGF conservative downdinged me for it, but I don't care, because I think it's the most accurate without targeting the wrong people.

35 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:16:05am

re: #32 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Nobody puts it on "Jewish people". And it's not wrong to put it on individuals who deserve it regardless of their ethnicity.

36 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:20:32am

re: #35 Sergey Romanov

Nobody puts it on "Jewish people".

hm…

37 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:20:48am

The other spin in it is that there are people who "delight" in seeing him branded a Christian.

Nobody is delighted in anything to do with this massacre, they are just feeling somewhat vindicated in their assertion that there can be a link between this sort of thinking and acts of depraved violence.

38 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:21:16am

re: #35 Sergey Romanov

Nobody puts it on "Jewish people".

Not so.

And it's not wrong to put it on individuals who deserve it regardless of their ethnicity.

I disagree. Debbie Schlussel doesn't need to be compared to Goebbels, especially as the daughter of a Holocaust survivor. Goebbels is Goebbels.

Schlussel is Schlussel. She, Geller, Spencer, Hates of Vienna, and their minions are definitely fascists, though not Third Reich. They should be viewed in terms of American rwnj fascism, because that's their context, no matter how many times Debbie Schlussel trots out her father's memory.

She's just another dumb American conservative bigot.

Afaic, calling her "Goebbels" is on the same level as calling Israel "apartheid". Needless, and ahistorical.

39 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:21:27am

re: #35 Sergey Romanov

Really, her article is so beyond the pale I don't know what to call her. Insulting the dead. Comparing them to inhuman, evil beings. Saying that they deserved to die and she feels no sympathy for them.

It's not a surprise, given that her response to Osama Bin Laden's death was to openly hope for the death of every Muslim man, woman, and child in the entire world.

Genocidal freak.

40 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:22:46am

Advocating genocide does put one in the same ball park as the Nazis...

41 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:22:48am

re: #36 000G

hm…

Nobody here, obviously.
---
This argument is bogus anyway. Nazis killed millions of Russians. Does that mean no Russian can be compared to a Nazi, or called a neo-Nazi? Pfft.

42 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:24:15am

re: #41 Sergey Romanov

Nazis killed millions of Russians. Does that mean no Russian can be compared to a Nazi, or called a neo-Nazi?

Obviously not.

43 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:24:57am

re: #38 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

No, calling her Goebbels is an insult. Those idiots who call Israel an apartheid pretend to be stating facts. No analogy whatsoever. So, yes, it is fine to call her Debbie Goebbels, or to call Kahane a Nazi, etc.

44 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:25:41am

re: #42 000G

Obviously not.

Of course.

45 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:26:52am

re: #42 000G

Expanding on that: There was no Jewish Liberation Army that collaborated with the Nazis. There was no Palestine Autonomy for collaborating Jews set up by the Nazis. And even though myriads of Soviet POWs died in German Stalags et al, the german genocide waged against the Jews was quite of a different nature than the overarching war of extermination against the Soviet Union as a whole…

46 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:27:25am

re: #41 Sergey Romanov

Nobody here, obviously.
---
This argument is bogus anyway. Nazis killed millions of Russians. Does that mean no Russian can be compared to a Nazi, or called a neo-Nazi? Pfft.

There are self-identified Russian neo-Nazis, as well as Serbian neo-Nazis.

Even though their forebears were slaughtered by *acutal* Nazis. I think it's STUPID but I don't have a dog in that fight.

And as you suggest, I try going over there to celebrate Pascha, see what happens to my ass, anyway.

Schlussel is American rwnj. So is Spencer/Geller/Herman Cain and the rest of the anti-Muslim rabblerousers. We already have a LONG history of murderous, genocidal, eliminationist xenophobia here, that doesn't need comparing to any other xenophobic, hate-based bunch of bigots.

47 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:27:41am

re: #45 000G

Sure, though none of that refutes my point.

48 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:28:31am

re: #46 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Nobody says it _needs_ such a comparison. It is, however, a legitimate insult.

49 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:29:04am

re: #47 Sergey Romanov

Sure, though none of that refutes my point.

Your point is predicated on the assumed premise that there is no meaningful difference between Russians and Jews in the context of WW2 and persecution by Germans. I challenge that point.

50 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:31:27am

re: #43 Sergey Romanov

No, calling her Goebbels is an insult. Those idiots who call Israel an apartheid pretend to be stating facts. No analogy whatsoever. So, yes, it is fine to call her Debbie Goebbels, or to call Kahane a Nazi, etc.

Do it if you want, defend it if you want, I'm just telling you why I think the Godwin card is inaccurate and not right. To me it's the same -- draw on some heinous history to smear your opponents, facutal, insulting, or not.

Everything is a Holocaust, now.

Everybody one doesn't like is Hitler/Goebbels/Nazis/apartheid, now.

Everyone who does something extraordinary is Rosa Parks or MLK or on a freedom ride, now. No, I think not.

51 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:31:34am

re: #49 000G

Um, no, my point is predicated on the premise that Nazis murdered millions of Russians and had genocidal plans for them (plan Ost), and yet there's nothing wrong with individual Nazi comparisons.

52 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:32:18am

re: #49 000G

Further: You cannot be a Nazi and not in principle agree with genocide against Jews (although you might disagree on methods and degrees of harshness etc). But you can be a Nazi and disagree in principle with genocide against Russians. Nazism was essentially anti-semitic, only accidentally anti-slavic.

53 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:33:13am

re: #52 000G


Nazis were not for wiping out the Slavs, just enslaving them.

Big difference there, eh?

54 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:33:19am

re: #51 Sergey Romanov

Um, no, my point is predicated on the premise that Nazis murdered millions of Russians and had genocidal plans for them (plan Ost), and yet there's nothing wrong with individual Nazi comparisons.

Plan Ost was a strategical plan as part of WW2. The Holocaust was just a logical conclusion of things that already written down in the 25 points party program of 1920.

55 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:34:29am

re: #50 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Sorry, that's exaggerating a bit, though I know what you're talking about. As an insult it works OK. Nobody proposes that in serious analysis (again, as purported by anti-Israel activists, for example) such comparisons should be used.

56 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:34:52am

re: #53 ralphieboy

Nazis were not for wiping out the Slavs, just enslaving them.

Big difference there, eh?

No, just for wiping out most of them, and sending the rest over Urals.

57 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:35:32am

re: #48 Sergey Romanov

Nobody says it _needs_ such a comparison. It is, however, a legitimate insult.

She's more on the level of Father Coughlin who is fading into obscurity because other loudmouths have eclipsed her.

But hey you're right, nobody knows who those are, so it won't have the desired impact. So let's just call her Goebbels and be done with it lol

58 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:36:16am

re: #53 ralphieboy

AFAIK, the Nazi plan for the Soviets was to "only" wipe out two thirds of them (one by direct killings, one by extermination through slave labor, enslave another third). While that would have been much, much more than all of the Jews of Europe in absolute numbers, it's still relatively less than how many of the Jews they wanted wiped out (all of them).

59 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:37:12am

re: #58 000G

All balances out as one Jew counts for at least three Slavs.

/

60 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:37:23am

re: #57 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Um, she's actually literally desiring the genocide of Muslims.

This isn't like somebody who's banning books being called a Nazi. She actually wants the US to kill every Muslim in the world.

This isn't a casual use of the Nazi analogy.

61 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:38:14am

re: #59 ralphieboy

All balances out as one Jew counts for at least three Slavs.

/

The definitions for genocide are predicated on relative terms, not absolute numbers.

62 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:38:59am

re: #60 Obdicut

She actually wants the US to kill every Muslim in the world.

Link, just for reference?

63 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:41:06am

re: #54 000G

Plan Ost was a strategical plan as part of WW2. The Holocaust was just a logical conclusion of things that already written down in the 25 points party program of 1920.


Strictly speaking, that is not historically true. If not for WWII contingencies, the Holocaust as we know it might have been avoided (it still would have happened, just on another scale and against select groups, e.g. Soviet Jews) - the plans for deportations to the Soviet territory were quite literal at first, and the plans for extermination of all Jews (and not only the Soviet ones) crystallized between October and December of 1941.

Anyhow, I don't see the relevance of the differences you're trying to point out. I will be the first to say there were differences. The main point stays: the Nazis exterminated millions of Russians, many of them - just because they were Russians (cf. the Untermensch brochure as well as plan Ost). Russians were victims of Nazis, and to say that the difference between treatment of Russians and Jews by the Nazis somehow influences how individuals of each group may not be called is illogical.

64 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:42:11am

re: #61 000G

The definitions for genocide are predicated on relative terms, not absolute numbers.

Since genocide does include "part of" clause, 2/3 is as much a genocide as 100%.

65 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:43:12am

re: #55 Sergey Romanov

Sorry, that's exaggerating a bit, though I know what you're talking about. As an insult it works OK. Nobody proposes that in serious analysis (again, as purported by anti-Israel activists, for example) such comparisons should be used.

They work, to what end?

It's not exaggerating, especially since you do appear to understand why labeling her a "bitch" is out of bounds.

I happen to understand why calling her a bitch and goebbels are both on the same level. You don't have to agree with me, that's ok. Take it from someone routinely labeled (including on these pages) an "asshole", myself, lol. If they perceieved me as a heterosexual woman, we already know the epithet chain that would be employed.

None of them would work, btw.

66 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:44:35am

re: #62 000G

Link, just for reference?

When Osama Bin Laden died, she said "One down, 1.8 billion to go."

There are 1.8 billion Muslims in the world.

The full quote:

Rot In Hell, Osama Bin Laden. One down, 1.8 billion to go. . . many of ‘em inside U.S. borders, with the U.S. government at all levels kissing their asses

67 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:45:34am

re: #65 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Bitch is predicated on her being a female.

Nazi is predicated on her being someone who advocates genocide.

Rather a large difference there.

68 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:45:36am

re: #63 Sergey Romanov

Strictly speaking, that is not historically true. If not for WWII contingencies, the Holocaust as we know it might have been avoided (it still would have happened, just on another scale and against select groups, e.g. Soviet Jews) - the plans for deportations to the Soviet territory were quite literal at first, and the plans for extermination of all Jews (and not only the Soviet ones) crystallized between October and December of 1941.

How is it not historically true? The Party program of 1920 already said that no Jew could be a German. It's logical what follows from that. "If not for WWII contingencies, the Holocaust as we know it might have been avoided" is a Pat Buchanan argument.

Anyhow, I don't see the relevance of the differences you're trying to point out. I will be the first to say there were differences. The main point stays: the Nazis exterminated millions of Russians, many of them - just because they were Russians (cf. the Untermensch brochure as well as plan Ost). Russians were victims of Nazis, and to say that the difference between treatment of Russians and Jews by the Nazis somehow influences how individuals of each group may not be called is illogical.

The difference is that Nazis always wanted to get rid of all Jews within their sphere of influence, and they only wanted to get rid of most (not all) Russians when they decided on their strategies for Plan Barbarossa, and that remained a strategic element of their war efforts, unlike the Holocaust which was continuted to be perpetraed despite war efforts (often hindering them due to blocking transportation capacities, as you know).

69 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:46:53am

re: #64 Sergey Romanov

Since genocide does include "part of" clause, 2/3 is as much a genocide as 100%.

It is also genocide. But the "as much" qualification does not make any sense.

70 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:46:58am

Can we get back to debating AGW now? We are in a full Nazi-genocide tailspin mode here.

71 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:47:11am

re: #66 Obdicut

When Osama Bin Laden died, she said "One down, 1.8 billion to go."

There are 1.8 billion Muslims in the world.

The full quote:

I was hoping for something more explicit. Thanks, though.

72 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:47:24am

re: #60 Obdicut

Um, she's actually literally desiring the genocide of Muslims.

This isn't like somebody who's banning books being called a Nazi. She actually wants the US to kill every Muslim in the world.

This isn't a casual use of the Nazi analogy.

I'm not defending any of Debbie Schlussel's views. Lol how counterintuitive would that be?

I'm only saying we have PLENTY of examples of genocidal behavior right here in the USA. We don't need to run to the Third Reich for scary names that conjure up certain emotions.

Because really, that's what the issue is about. Don't get on me for it, I was not the one scolding others for calling her a "bitch", but that's what launched the conversation.

If we should think twice about calling her a bitch, we should also think twice about wielding Nazi imagery against a Jew, since both really only serve emotional ends.

73 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:47:43am

re: #71 000G

I was hoping for something more explicit. Thanks, though.

How is that not explicit, please?

74 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:48:05am

re: #65 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

The difference is, you can call anyone a "Goebbels" in appropriate circumstances, and only a woman a "bitch". (Yeah, yeah, I know that the b-word is now often used jokingly between males, etc. - I mean as a true insult). Again, I will refer to the way many in Russia call "Nashi" youth movement as well as other associated Putinist groups - Putinjugend. And I'm on board with that. Because the way they behave is very reminiscent of Hitlerjugend. I don't care that they seem not to have killed anyone yet.

(By googling I see that people in the West are also not averse to this moniker.)

75 Digital Display  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:48:26am

re: #66 Obdicut

When Osama Bin Laden died, she said "One down, 1.8 billion to go."

There are 1.8 billion Muslims in the world.

The full quote:

Obdi..Up all night on Friday....I'm never up this early..And I'm practicing a Karaoke song
I'm ate up *wink*

76 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:49:26am

re: #68 000G

I suggest you read something on the origin of the Final Solution before labeling historical facts "Pat Buchanan arguments".

77 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:49:33am

re: #72 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

I'm only saying we have PLENTY of examples of genocidal behavior right here in the USA. We don't need to run to the Third Reich for scary names that conjure up certain emotions.

Sure. You don't need to. So what?


If we should think twice about calling her a bitch, we should also think twice about wielding Nazi imagery against a Jew, since both really only serve emotional ends.

No, I'm sorry, that's not true. Nazi imagery calls to mind genocide, which is something she supports. Others may support genocide, but there's no one more famous for genocide than the Nazis.

I'm not calling her a Nazi, partially because it makes people start knee-jerk responding like this, but there is no comparison between why it's improper to call her a bitch.

78 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:49:44am

re: #73 Obdicut

How is that not explicit, please?

The reader still has to draw his or her own conclusions. It's true that there are no other possible meaningful conclusions than that she wants all muslims killed (not neccessarily by the U.S., though, that could be left open). But she does not say it outright.

79 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:49:49am

re: #67 Obdicut

Bitch is predicated on her being a female.

Nazi is predicated on her being someone who advocates genocide.

Rather a large difference there.

Andrew Jackson also advocated genocide and is much closer to home.

But it doesn't have the same emotional heft. I get it, I really do.

The same logic is what the crankodoodle left employs to smear Israel as "Apartheid", truth be damned about actual Apartheid.

80 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:50:23am

re: #69 000G

It is also genocide. But the "as much" qualification does not make any sense.

It's either a genocide or it isn't.

81 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:50:27am

re: #76 Sergey Romanov

I suggest you read something on the origin of the Final Solution before labeling historical facts "Pat Buchanan arguments".

Oh, I have.

82 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:50:53am

re: #80 Sergey Romanov

It's either a genocide or it isn't.

That's a qualification. "As much" is a quantification.

83 CuriousLurker  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:51:13am

re: #66 Obdicut

When Osama Bin Laden died, she said "One down, 1.8 billion to go."

There are 1.8 billion Muslims in the world.

The full quote:

Wow, I hadn't heard about that one. Just Googled it and saw it for myself. Sounds pretty clear to me even though she tried to say that's not what she was saying.

84 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:51:40am

re: #68 000G

How is it not historically true? The Party program of 1920 already said that no Jew could be a German. It's logical what follows from that. "If not for WWII contingencies, the Holocaust as we know it might have been avoided" is a Pat Buchanan argument.

Yes, it's logical what follows from that: They wanted no Jews to have German citizenship. That is completely consistent with exiling the German Jews as a labor force to the conquered Russian territories after killing those they deemed 'dangerous'.

85 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:52:38am

re: #77 Obdicut

Sure. You don't need to. So what?

And others do.

And??

Others may support genocide, but there's no one more famous for genocide than the Nazis.

Well now you're making my argument for me. No one dispute the emotional significance of attaching the word "Nazi" to one's opponents.

The BDS movement tried it against Israel, and failed. So now they're on to Apartheid.

Maybe in another few years we can start calling Debbie Schlussel "Pieter Botha"...oh wait, not the same emotional significance.

Hm, gee, I give up. ///

86 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:52:55am

re: #79 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Andrew Jackson also advocated genocide and is much closer to home.

But almost nobody knows that.


But it doesn't have the same emotional heft. I get it, I really do.

No, you don't. It's getting a little annoying that you're claiming I'm lying when talking to you. Why do you think that?


The same logic is what the crankodoodle left employs to smear Israel as "Apartheid", truth be damned about actual Apartheid.

Again, how so? Israel is not apartheid. That's why calling Israel apartheid is wrong. It's a completely inaccurate description.

87 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:53:33am

re: #81 000G

Oh, I have.

They you wouldn't have labeled the historical fact that the Holocaust as we know it wasn't a necessary continuation of the Nazi policy as a "Pat Buchanan argument".

88 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:53:37am

re: #85 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Well now you're making my argument for me. No one dispute the emotional significance of attaching the word "Nazi" to one's opponents.

Why do you keep calling it 'emotional' significance?

89 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:54:00am

re: #84 Obdicut

Yes, it's logical what follows from that: They wanted no Jews to have German citizenship. That is completely consistent with exiling the German Jews as a labor force to the conquered Russian territories after killing those they deemed 'dangerous'.

I am not sure whether we actually disagree here: I am saying that the plans for deportation or extermination of all Jews within German reach were already inherent in Nazi essentials in 1920. They were not just brought about by logistical difficulties that have come up between 1939 and 1941.

Is this a functionalists versus intentionalists kind of squabble?

90 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:54:12am

re: #82 000G

That's a qualification. "As much" is a quantification.

No, as much means it would have been just as a genocide as any others.

91 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:54:37am

re: #89 000G

I am not sure whether we actually disagree here: I am saying that the plans for deportation or extermination of all Jews within German reach were already inherent in Nazi essentials in 1920.

And that's what Sergey is saying too. Which you labeled as Pat Buchanan level rhetoric. Why?

92 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:55:09am

re: #91 Obdicut

And that's what Sergey is saying too.

Uh, no. See #87.

93 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:56:46am

re: #92 000G

Uh, no. See #87.

So are you saying that the Holocaust as we know it was a _necessary_, rather than a probable consequence of the earlier Nazi policy? Name recent historians who agree with this view.

94 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:56:56am

re: #90 Sergey Romanov

No, as much means it would have been just as a genocide as any others.

It can mean that but "as much" is also a quantifier and there were other choices of words available for simple semantical equivalence. Oh well…

95 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:57:33am

re: #92 000G

Uh, no. See #87.

Yes. I see it. I think you're not actually understanding what Sergey is saying, and being extremely quick to amazingly offensively label what he's saying as equivalent to Pat Buchanan. Seriously, you're calling someone who spends his time fighting against holocaust denial a holocaust denier. Why?

96 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:57:37am

re: #94 000G

A genocide is a genocide. I don't see why you're trying to split hairs here.

97 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:57:37am

re: #86 Obdicut

But almost nobody knows that.

Oh, I understand the argument, don't get me wrong.

Tar her with the label everybody knows about. Even though 1- Anders Breivik took everything he knows from American fascists, 2- the US rightwing, including Debbie Schlussel, is exporting their particular brand of xenophobia, which is homegrown right here in the US.

No, you don't. It's getting a little annoying that you're claiming I'm lying when talking to you. Why do you think that?

I haven't made that claim. That's an invention on your part.

Again, how so? Israel is not apartheid. That's why calling Israel apartheid is wrong. It's a completely inaccurate description.

Calling Debbie Schlussel "Goebbels" or some other Nazi reference is also inaccurate. She's a homegrown American conservative rwnj bigot. They have a long, long history here.

98 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:59:18am

re: #95 Obdicut

Seriously, you're calling someone who spends his time fighting against holocaust denial a holocaust denier. Why?

I am not calling Sergey a holocaust denier. Buchanan employed the argument that if Britain had not pushed Germany into WW2, the Holocaust would not have happened. Buchanan also denied the holocaust. It is obvious which Buchanan argument I was refering to in my analogy.

99 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 2:59:48am

re: #96 Sergey Romanov

A genocide is a genocide. I don't see why you're trying to split hairs here.

Singularity of the Holocaust is not "splitting hairs".

100 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:00:32am

re: #98 000G

Except that's not an argument I was making. So why did you bring Pat Buchanan?

101 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:00:43am

re: #93 Sergey Romanov

So are you saying that the Holocaust as we know it was a _necessary_, rather than a probable consequence of the earlier Nazi policy? Name recent historians who agree with this view.

I am a rather strong intentionalist, you seem to be a rather strong functionalist. I don't think there's much agreement to be had here.

102 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:00:58am

re: #88 Obdicut

Why do you keep calling it 'emotional' significance?

Because that's the only reason it's being used.

A more accurate description, our own murderous, smallpox blanket, reservation/segregation/American Legion/white nationalist bigots -- nobody knows about them. So hey, let's be lazy and use the next best thing, the Third Reich.

Why do you think the Gaza cranks use "apartheid" and call themselves on "Freedom rides"? If they didn't tap into some imagined emotional capital, no one would bother. Same with calling everything a Holocaust when it's not or Nazis when they're American rightwing xenophobes.

103 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:01:37am

re: #100 Sergey Romanov

Except that's not an argument I was making. So why did you bring Pat Buchanan?

Buchanan's argument can be boiled down to: If not for WW2, there would have been no Holocaust as we know it. That's what you have said, at least as I read it.

104 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:02:19am

re: #99 000G

Singularity of the Holocaust is not "splitting hairs".

No, but what _you_ are doing is splitting hairs. A genocide may be unique in its particulars, but in the end all genocides are just that - genocides.

105 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:03:22am

re: #97 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

I haven't made that claim. That's an invention on your part.

No, it's not. When you say "But it doesn't have the same emotional heft. I get it, I really do.", you're implying that you get that I want to use the term, or am defending the use of the term, because of the emotional heft of it. That's not true. So please stop claiming it.

Calling Debbie Schlussel "Goebbels" or some other Nazi reference is also inaccurate. She's a homegrown American conservative rwnj bigot. They have a long, long history here.

But apartheid, when used against Israel, is meant to be literal. It's an actual accusation that Israel is apartheid. Debbie Goebbels, used against her, is obviously an analogy, and not literal.

106 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:03:47am

re: #104 Sergey Romanov

No, but what _you_ are doing is splitting hairs. A genocide may be unique in its particulars, but in the end all genocides are just that - genocides.

All genocides are genocides. Yes, that's trivial and banal. That they are all "just" genocides "in the end" – no, I disagree. Misleading equivalence.

107 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:04:45am

Well good morning active honcos.

108 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:06:10am

re: #105 Obdicut

But apartheid, when used against Israel, is meant to be literal. It's an actual accusation that Israel is apartheid. Debbie Goebbels, used against her, is obviously an analogy, and not literal.

Apartheid was a specific phenomenon in South African history to which Israel's policies are made out to be similar to. Goebbels was a specific phenomenon in German history that Schlussel might be made out to be similar to. They are both analogies.

109 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:06:11am

re: #102 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Because that's the only reason it's being used.

Why not listen to what I'm saying?

It's used because it has historical weight. If you say that someone is a Goebbels, it's not the emotional impact that's most important, to me, but the actual historical association. It means that person is a supporter of genocide.

Thank you for confirming that you are saying I'm lying when I say that it's not because of emotional impact that it's being used.

Can you explain why you said you weren't accusing me of lying, when you now repeat the assertion that I'm lying?

Or do you just think I'm confused, and actually like it for the emotional weight of it rather than the historical reference?

110 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:07:06am

re: #109 Obdicut

It's used because it has historical weight. If you say that someone is a Goebbels, it's not the emotional impact that's most important, to me, but the actual historical association.

That's assuming that everybody has at least a somewhat accurate understanding of history.

111 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:07:23am

re: #108 000G

Apartheid was a specific phenomenon in South African history to which Israel's policies are made out to be similar to.

No, apartheid is an actual policy. You can point to a society and say "that is apartheid at work" or "that is not apartheid".

It's not an analogy. It is an accusation of dual classes of citizenship based around ethnic lines.

112 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:08:47am

re: #105 Obdicut

No, it's not. When you say "But it doesn't have the same emotional heft. I get it, I really do.", you're implying that you get that I want to use the term, or am defending the use of the term, because of the emotional heft of it. That's not true. So please stop claiming it.

But apartheid, when used against Israel, is meant to be literal. It's an actual accusation that Israel is apartheid. Debbie Goebbels, used against her, is obviously an analogy, and not literal.

Well, you're right. Neither are literal. Both analogies are false.

Debbie Goebbels, the term I called her once "Swastika Girl", those are false analogies.

There are better, more accurate ones. But those don't pull the same moral/ethical weight as Nazi ones. Right?

113 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:08:55am

re: #110 000G

That's assuming that everybody has at least a somewhat accurate understanding of history.

As would using Jackson, or Coughlin, or anyone else.

Oh, and I missed this:

re: #78 000G

The reader still has to draw his or her own conclusions. It's true that there are no other possible meaningful conclusions than that she wants all muslims killed (not neccessarily by the U.S., though, that could be left open). But she does not say it outright.

So there's only one possible interpretation, but it's not explicit?

I don't follow. It clearly means she wants every Muslim in the world dead. It explicitly means that.

114 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:09:21am

re: #111 Obdicut

No, apartheid is an actual policy. You can point to a society and say "that is apartheid at work" or "that is not apartheid".

It's not an analogy. It is an accusation of dual classes of citizenship based around ethnic lines.

Apartheid means first and foremost the specific racist policies installed in South Africa during a specific period in history. It does not mean first and foremost just those policies. The general policies are just called "racial segregation".

115 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:09:22am

re: #101 000G

I am a rather strong intentionalist, you seem to be a rather strong functionalist. I don't think there's much agreement to be had here.

It's not a difference of opinion, sorry. Holocaust historiography has long ago passed the "f v. i" barrier as far as I'm concerned. The thesis and anti-thesis have resulted in a synthesis of recent works of the subject, such as Browning's, Longerich's and others'. It's an _evidence_ based approach. And the evidence shows that the plans for deportations - rather than wholesale extermination - were alive for some time even after 22.06.1941 and even after the full-scale genocide of the Soviet Jewry. There is nothing to support the notion that wholesale extermination was an omnipresent feature of the concrete Nazi policy in 1939, 1940, part of 1941. The documents show otherwise. At some point in late 1941 such plans did become the Nazi policy. That also means that if the circumstances were otherwise, it may not have happened, or it may have happened but very differently.

To even bring Buchanan into discussion is a joke, sorry.

116 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:09:30am

re: #112 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Well, you're right. Neither are literal. Both analogies are false.

It's not meant as an analogy when used against Israel. It's meant literally.

117 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:10:12am

re: #78 000G

So there's only one possible interpretation, but it's not explicit?

I don't follow. It clearly means she wants every Muslim in the world dead. It explicitly means that.

No: It neccessarily means that but only implicitly so.

118 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:11:11am

re: #106 000G

All genocides are genocides. Yes, that's trivial and banal. That they are all "just" genocides "in the end" – no, I disagree. Misleading equivalence.

Sorry, the fact of the genocide overwhelms other factors. Nothing misleading about that. We may wrangle about what lead to what, but in the end masses of people have been murdered.

119 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:12:30am

re: #115 Sergey Romanov

It's not a difference of opinion, sorry.

That's your opinion. I don't think there's any evidence for anything less than wholesame extermination (i.e. Madasgar plan) ever having been more than just toying around.

120 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:13:10am

re: #118 Sergey Romanov

Sorry, the fact of the genocide overwhelms other factors.

That's your opinion, then.

Nothing misleading about that. We may wrangle about what lead to what, but in the end masses of people have been murdered.

Again: It's not about the numbers.

121 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:13:34am

re: #117 000G

So you're willing to accuse Sergey of a Pat Buchanan style argument for rightly noting that the Germans didn't have an exterminationist policy towards Jews until later in the war-- a view that you then goddamn echo-- but you want to split semantic hairs about whether a necessary meaning is explicit?

I forget, are you not a native English speaker?

122 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:15:14am

re: #119 000G

That's your opinion. I don't think there's any evidence for anything less than wholesame extermination (i.e. Madasgar plan) ever having been more than just toying around.

It's not just opinion. The plan of deportation as labor to the conquered Russian territories is historical fact, and, indeed, makes a lot of evil sense.

It is not a Pat Buchanan argument.

123 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:15:37am

re: #83 CuriousLurker

Wow, I hadn't heard about that one. Just Googled it and saw it for myself. Sounds pretty clear to me even though she tried to say that's not what she was saying.

Typical bullying behavior: when you call them out on it, they try to wiggle out from under it, (and even delete incriminating parts of blog pages if need be)...

124 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:15:42am

re: #119 000G

That's your opinion. I don't think there's any evidence for anything less than wholesame extermination (i.e. Madasgar plan) ever having been more than just toying around.

"That's your opinion" is not an argument, sorry. Madagascar plan was a real plan that would have resulted in massive deaths, but not wholesale extermination. You still have no historical support for your private notions about Nazi policy.

125 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:16:19am

re: #121 Obdicut

So you're willing to accuse Sergey of a Pat Buchanan style argument for rightly noting that the Germans didn't have an exterminationist policy towards Jews until later in the war--

Of course there were no death camps in the 1920. But that does not mean that the extermination was only possible or likely back then, assuming the Nazis would have gotten into power eventually.

a view that you then goddamn echo--

I do not.


but you want to split semantic hairs about whether a necessary meaning is explicit?

Why are you getting upset about being corrected about this? Explicit does not mean neccessary. Something can be neccessary and implicit. Big deal.

126 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:16:22am

re: #119 000G

By the way, the fact that the Nazis let some Jews leave-- after taking almost all their worldly goods, of course-- how does that fit into your comprehension?

127 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:16:39am

tailspin

how 'bout that Global Warming. all a hoax, eh?

128 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:17:16am

re: #120 000G

That's your opinion, then.

If you want to boil everything down to opinions, fine, just don't forget that yours are opinions too, so don't base arguments on those.

129 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:17:27am

re: #124 Sergey Romanov

"That's your opinion" is not an argument, sorry. Madagascar plan was a real plan that would have resulted in massive deaths, but not wholesale extermination.

Madagascar plan was never a serious option for nazi policies, that's my point.

130 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:17:50am

re: #109 Obdicut

Why not listen to what I'm saying?

It's used because it has historical weight. If you say that someone is a Goebbels, it's not the emotional impact that's most important, to me, but the actual historical association. It means that person is a supporter of genocide.

Thank you for confirming that you are saying I'm lying when I say that it's not because of emotional impact that it's being used.

Can you explain why you said you weren't accusing me of lying, when you now repeat the assertion that I'm lying?

Or do you just think I'm confused, and actually like it for the emotional weight of it rather than the historical reference?

I hear what you're saying, I just happen to disagree, and have a different opinion than you. You're not required to agree with my opinion.

We have many examples of genocide in our own history. From my own family history, read about Forsyth County, CA and the so-called Racial Cleansing of 1912, i.e. 100 years ago. The county is still overwhelmingly white, 100 years later.

They are not as glamorous as Nazi genocide. Neither are the cities and towns that got rid of their Asian/Asian-American populations over 100 years.

Anti-Israel dupes tried and still try smearing Israel as Zionazi, AshkenNAZI and all other manner of bullshit using the "nazi" moniker.

They call it a historical reference, too, does that make it a legit analogy, just because they're attached to it?

Since it didn't work, they've now moved on to the apartheid historical reference. Soon, it will be Jim Crow....thanks to Alice Walker and her Freedom Ride historical reference, it's already moving in that direction.

Doesn't make it so.

131 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:17:51am

re: #125 000G

Of course there were no death camps in the 1920. But that does not mean that the extermination was only possible or likely back then, assuming the Nazis would have gotten into power eventually.

If the Germans were fully exterminationist then, then why did they let any Jews leave Germany?

Why are you getting upset about being corrected about this? Explicit does not mean neccessary. Something can be neccessary and implicit. Big deal.

Again: are you not a native English speaker? You seem to be using a grammar-literal meaning of the word explicit, and ignoring how it's actually used in speech.

132 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:19:04am

re: #126 Obdicut

By the way, the fact that the Nazis let some Jews leave-- after taking almost all their worldly goods, of course-- how does that fit into your comprehension?

Corruption (called thusly from a Nazi POV). See also Vorzugsjuden or Austauschjuden, though.

133 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:19:10am

re: #130 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

I'm sorry, I can't help you with the argument you're having with people who aren't me. I have no idea why you're bringing up people who smear Israel.

134 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:20:03am

re: #132 000G

Corruption (called thusly from a Nazi POV). See also Vorzugsjuden or Austauschjuden, though.

So your claim is that there was an actual Nazi policy against letting any Jews leave, but corrupt officials let them go?

135 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:23:29am

re: #134 Obdicut

So your claim is that there was an actual Nazi policy against letting any Jews leave, but corrupt officials let them go?

Things like the Helldorf-Spende were unofficial. But the Reichsfluchtsteuer was official policy. I guess you could argue that between 1939 and 1941 Nazis were tinkering with letting Jews leave.

136 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:24:11am

re: #116 Obdicut

It's not meant as an analogy when used against Israel. It's meant literally.

Calling her a "bitch", is that literal or analogy, given that "bitch" as used today has nothing to do with the literal meaning of a pregnant canine? Sergey says it's out of bounds. I say, both are out of bounds. You don't have to agree or go by it.

The comparisons are objectionable because they are inherently false, not because somebody may or may not mean it "literally". Some people are using it as an analogy, people who have no clue what "apartheid" was, or -- back to our familiar topic -- that we have our own history of that here.

That's the sort of slippage that leads to worse analogies like Gaza flotillas = freedom rides, coming from people who definitely know better but are just clinging to whatever historical analogy will get their point across.

Sorry, there is no way around the emotional significance of choosing some symbols of evil over other lesser known or unglamorous ones.

137 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:24:56am

re: #129 000G

Madagascar plan was never a serious option for nazi policies, that's my point.

But it was. You're misinformed on this point. See [Link: books.google.com...]

138 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:26:09am

re: #137 Sergey Romanov

But it was. You're misinformed on this point. See [Link: books.google.com...]

I don't see anything there refuting my point. Care to point it out?

139 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:26:10am

re: #136 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Sorry, there is no way around the emotional significance of choosing some symbols of evil over other lesser known or unglamorous ones.

Sure there is. By pointing out that using one that's well-known communicates the analogy more easily than using a lesser-known one.

I have no idea why you'd prefer to ignore this and instead assert that I really want to use the phrase for its emotional resonance.

140 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:29:12am

re: #135 000G

Things like the Helldorf-Spende were unofficial. But the Reichsfluchtsteuer was official policy. I guess you could argue that between 1939 and 1941 Nazis were tinkering with letting Jews leave.

Thank you for conceding that you were wrong.

141 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:29:23am

re: #137 Sergey Romanov

Like a spectacular meteor, the Madagascar Plan blazed across the sky of Nazi Jewish policy, only to butn out abruptly. It was no less real for its brief existence. There can be "no doubt that during this period both Rademacher and Eichmann tackled the plan in full earnest". More important, it was taken seriously by the Nazi leadership. To Frank's great relief and Greiser's diappointment, the impending deportations from the Warthegau to the Geenral Government were canceled. Frank in turn temporarily ordered the end of ghetto construction as pointless. These men were not carrying out an elaborate sham; they were making real decisions based on the Madagascar Plan as a real part of Nazi Jewish policy in the summer of 1940.

142 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:30:05am

re: #140 Obdicut

Thank you for conceding that you were wrong.

I didn't.

143 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:30:17am

re: #138 000G

I don't see anything there refuting my point. Care to point it out?

Then perhaps you should read it...

144 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:31:25am

re: #142 000G

I didn't.

If the Germans were "tinkering with letting Jews leave", then were they exterminationist from the very beginning?

145 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:31:39am

re: #133 Obdicut

I'm sorry, I can't help you with the argument you're having with people who aren't me. I have no idea why you're bringing up people who smear Israel.

If I wanted your help, I would just ask for it.

To recap: before you entered the conversation, I was saying that there's no need to reference "nazis" to talk about what Schlussel is doing. My point has been, everything's hitler (Godwin) now, everything's a Holocaust, everybody's a nazi, now.

Sorry, but I find that lazy thinking, especially since we have our own longstanding history of xenophobia, manifest destiny, genocide, smallpox blankets, racial cleansings, alien land laws, immigration quotas, education quotas, the list goes on and on, rightchere.

It may be easier and more convenient to draw on nazis. But we don't have to.

Afaic, that's what Schlussel, Geller, Spencer, Lind, Weyrich, Beck, Dilling, Skousen, Benson and the rest of the CPAC/John Birch Society bigots are drawing on, not the nazis, not hitler or the rest.

You seem attached to those references, for whatever your reasons. Use them or don't, that's up to you.

I've only been saying why I don't use them, and don't need them. Why that's some major issue for you, I'll never know until you tell me.

146 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:31:47am

re: #143 Sergey Romanov

Then perhaps you should read it...

I have read some about the plan, though not an interpretation of it as quoted by you, which I was asking for in the context of this debate. Thanks.

147 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:32:22am

re: #144 Obdicut

If the Germans were "tinkering with letting Jews leave", then were they exterminationist from the very beginning?

How is one necessarily contradicting the other?

148 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:32:50am

re: #145 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

To recap: before you entered the conversation, I was saying that there's no need to reference "nazis" to talk about what Schlussel is doing.

Entirely true. There's no need.


You seem attached to those references, for whatever your reasons. Use them or don't, that's up to you.

I guess you're not actually bothering to read my posts, since I haven't ever used the analogy and said that I wouldn't.

149 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:33:10am

re: #147 000G

How is one necessarily contradicting the other?

Um, if you let Jews leave, you're not exterminating them, are you?

150 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:33:18am

re: #146 000G

I have read some about the plan, though not an interpretation of it as quoted by you, which I was asking for in the context of this debate. Thanks.

How about this, read Browning's book (I can send you e-book), and then say what you find disagreeable in his conclusions?

151 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:33:51am

re: #149 Obdicut

Um, if you let Jews leave, you're not exterminating them, are you?

You might do it later. Nazis weren't exactly isolationist.

152 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:34:21am

re: #150 Sergey Romanov

How about this, read Browning's book (I can send you e-book), and then say what you find disagreeable in his conclusions?

Alright, sounds fair. Might take me a while, though.

153 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:35:32am

re: #152 000G

Alright, sounds fair. Might take me a while, though.

OK. Shoot me an e-mail please, I will send it out in 2-3 days.

154 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:36:19am

re: #153 Sergey Romanov

OK. Shoot me an e-mail please, I will send it out in 2-3 days.

(Otherwise I'll forget.)

155 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:36:36am

re: #139 Obdicut

Sure there is. By pointing out that using one that's well-known communicates the analogy more easily than using a lesser-known one.

I have no idea why you'd prefer to ignore this and instead assert that I really want to use the phrase for its emotional resonance.

If it's anything I've asserved, several times, it's that it's up to you or anyone else how they use Nazi imagery based on their ease of use. I just think it's inappropriate to use Nazi smears against Jews but again, that's my choice. Using them against whomever is your or anyone else's option.

It's not personal at all, and never has been, despite your efforts to make it so. They're starting to look kind of desperate.

156 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:36:48am

re: #151 000G

You might do it later. Nazis weren't exactly isolationist.

Well, there's obviously no point in continuing this discussion, if you're going to reject actual evidence of Nazis letting Jews leave and not exterminating them as indicative of nothing given that they could exterminate them later. Then any discussion of the Madagascar plan or deportation to the Russian territories doesn't matter, because you'll just say they were planning on exterminating them later.

You've begged the question, and there's nowhere to go.

157 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:37:27am

re: #148 Obdicut

Entirely true. There's no need.

I guess you're not actually bothering to read my posts, since I haven't ever used the analogy and said that I wouldn't.

Then there's no need to be defensive against anything I've said.

158 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:38:29am

re: #155 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

If it's anything I've asserved, several times, it's that it's up to you or anyone else how they use Nazi imagery based on their ease of use. I just think it's inappropriate to use Nazi smears against Jews but again, that's my choice. Using them against whomever is your or anyone else's option.

It's not personal at all, and never has been, despite your efforts to make it so. They're starting to look kind of desperate.

It's more baffling that you appear not to be reading what I'm actually writing. I don't think it's personal. It's kind of the opposite; you're having some generic argument with me, and not reading what I'm actually saying, or paying attention to my actual opinions.

159 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:39:03am

re: #153 Sergey Romanov

OK. Shoot me an e-mail please, I will send it out in 2-3 days.

Sent.

160 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:39:42am

re: #157 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Then there's no need to be defensive against anything I've said.

Hee hee. Um, the same to you? I have no idea what you're talking about at this point.

161 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:40:19am

re: #156 Obdicut

Well, there's obviously no point in continuing this discussion, if you're going to reject actual evidence of Nazis letting Jews leave and not exterminating them as indicative of nothing given that they could exterminate them later. Then any discussion of the Madagascar plan or deportation to the Russian territories doesn't matter, because you'll just say they were planning on exterminating them later.

You've begged the question, and there's nowhere to go.

Invasion of Britain, where many Jews fled to, was a real Nazi plan. Also remember the Jews of Tunisia.

162 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:41:24am

re: #161 000G

Invasion of Britain, where many Jews fled to, was a real Nazi plan. Also remember the Jews of Tunisia.

So it was. However, my point is that what you're attempting to prove is that the Germans were exterminationist from the beginning. However, you're using it as an assumption, rather than something to be proved. There is no possible way to argue against that.

163 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:42:47am

re: #162 Obdicut

However, you're using it as an assumption, rather than something to be proved.

I don't. Don't Popper me, dude.

164 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:44:58am

re: #158 Obdicut

It's more baffling that you appear not to be reading what I'm actually writing. I don't think it's personal. It's kind of the opposite; you're having some generic argument with me, and not reading what I'm actually saying, or paying attention to my actual opinions.

I could easily say the exact same thing, that you're talking past me with some imagined adversary.

In fact, I could say this is hardly an argument at all, since you see me as accusing you of lying, arguing with you in someone else's stead, doing -- whatever -- when I've done no such things at all.

For whatever reasons, you've opted to take what I've said as a personal affront, yet you seem to think I'm the one who's confused. Why?

165 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:47:19am

Enh, I'm out. Life calls.

166 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:47:42am

re: #163 000G

I don't. Don't Popper me, dude.

What would you accept as evidence that the Nazis were not exterminationist from the beginning?

And what is your proof that they were?

167 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:50:08am

re: #160 Obdicut

Hee hee. Um, the same to you? I have no idea what you're talking about at this point.

I do not doubt that at all. But I haven't said anything different now than when this conversation started what, an hour and a half ago? lol

168 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:51:55am

Can we get back to debating AGW now or something less tedious and circular?

169 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:53:00am

re: #168 ralphieboy

Can we get back to debating AGW now or something less tedious and circular?

Aww now where's the fun and controversy in that? /

170 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:53:29am

Making fun of Al Gore!

171 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:56:28am

Al was pretty cute in his day.

Did you see the Tipper/PMRC/Oprah clip downstairs? It = smh

172 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:58:28am

re: #164 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

173 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:58:37am

re: #166 Obdicut

What would you accept as evidence that the Nazis were not exterminationist from the beginning?

And what is your proof that they were?

Notably, I would agree that the Holocaust was inherent in the Nazi writings since 1920 in the sense that it was a real possibility, based on what they wrote, and they would have, of course, been glad if every Jew just dropped dead. The only sense in which they weren't exterminationist from the beginning is the practical policy sense. The modern consensus is that they didn't even plan for the wholesale murder of the Soviet Jews on 22.6.41, only for decimation of the "Bolshevik element" among them (Commisar Order) - in the first days they were mostly shooting what they considered "adult males" (ca. 16-65 y.o.). But once you begin shooting, there's a problem of where to stop. So naturally enough, the policy radicalized into wholesale slaughter of Soviet Jews regardless of sex and age.

That, however, is not a "functionalist" perspective. The decisions from above played as much role as pressures from below. Some functionalists have argued that there was no "Fuehrer Order" as such, but as I said, the gap between functionalists and intentionalists has been more or less bridged since then. At times circumstances played role in shaping policy, but "Fuehrer's decision", as recorded by Goebbels and Frank, is also undeniable.

174 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:00:06am

re: #170 ralphieboy

Making fun of Al Gore!

Apparently not as worried about dangerous sea level rises as he touts in his speeches, Former Vice President Al Gore and his wife Tipper have purchased a seaside villa in Montecito, California. The Nobel Laureate reported paid $8.8 million for the property.

Heh. Rising seas are coming to get him.

[Link: www.examiner.com...]

175 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:00:23am

re: #164 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Hah, I had so much text there.

Okay. Let me replicate the only actually important bit:

What I'm saying is that the emotional weight actually gets in the way of the historical analogy, and that's why I don't use Nazi analogies at almost any point.

So, it's kind of the opposite of wanting to use it for the emotional weight. I'd like to use such analogies because of the historical weight, but I don't, because they lead to squabbles like this.

176 otoc  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:00:45am

lol, I've been linking this Stewart vid since he made it in posts that seem to annoy my rightwing friends. Such insults to Stewart until they see the one where he wonders about Obama in the debt talks. Then it's OK to use Stewart as an example. Such duplicity. Both with Fox on the "don't make this about Jesus", and the right on only wanting to use Stewart when the purpose serves them ;p

I don't get my news from Jon, but I do enjoy his look at politics at both sides.

177 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:01:18am

re: #173 Sergey Romanov

The modern consensus is that they didn't even plan for the wholesale murder of the Soviet Jews on 22.6.41, only for decimation of the "Bolshevik element" among them (Commisar Order) - in the first days they were mostly shooting what they considered "adult males" (ca. 16-65 y.o.).

Which, by the way, is reminiscent of Srebrenica. OH NOEZ! I made another Nazi comparison! Sue me.

178 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:05:40am

re: #173 Sergey Romanov

Agreed. The end result of exterminationist policy was a probable outcome from the very beginning-- even beyond Jews, given the Nazis idea on racial purity. It's hard to imagine a Nazi Europe with any room for the Roma.

However, I think their great fondness for slave labor and lording it over the lesser races might well have led to that, instead, in the nightmare future where the Nazis win. Jews, Slavs, and other races not exterminated wholesale but enslaved as living symbols of Nazi ideological triumph.

Yerch. Makes me so sick to my stomach to think about.

179 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:13:12am

re: #178 Obdicut

In fact, if we look at "microstudies", we see that there have been internal struggles between Nazi attritionists and Nazi annihilationists, the former basing their arguments on economic considerations, and the latter on ideology.

As for the Roma and Sinti, notably the Nazi policy differed in an important way from the treatment of the Jews. The Nazis fully acknowledged the "Aryan" roots of the Gypsies and at first they were trying to "reeducate" those of them they considered racially pure Zigeuner (IIRC Zigeuner "Mischlinge" were considered to be inferior - which was the opposite for the Jewish "Mischlinge"). It is after the failure they began mowing them down and sending them to concentration camps.

180 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:13:37am
181 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:17:07am

re: #175 Obdicut

Hah, I had so much text there.

Okay. Let me replicate the only actually important bit:

What I'm saying is that the emotional weight actually gets in the way of the historical analogy, and that's why I don't use Nazi analogies at almost any point.

So, it's kind of the opposite of wanting to use it for the emotional weight. I'd like to use such analogies because of the historical weight, but I don't, because they lead to squabbles like this.

But it's not a squabble at all.

I agree with you; like I said earlier, you're making my argument for me.

Don't get tripped up over the word "emotional". I used it for many reasons. You can agree with them, or not. Either way is fine with me.

Here is my position, again:

1) "bitch" is used against Debbie Schlussel in the same exact way, for emotional, not rational or historical reasons

1a) I wasn't the one who objected to it, even as a woman who gets that emotional response tossed at me all the dang time, especially given my views, and my manner. Anyway,

1b) If it's wrong to use that word against Debbie Schlussel, then why should we not consider the use of Godwin card against her as well?

2) Debbie Schlussel is not a product of Nazi hate. Her father is a victim of Nazi hate. Debbie Schlussel is bathed in American rightwing xenophobia and obviously her parent's experience. That American rightwing xenophobia has a long history here. She fits into it like hand in glove and seems to like it that way.

3) Godwin's law strikes a chord, perhaps an emotional chord, with us for a reason -- the reason is it's a form of logical fallacy. I hope some day in my glorious internet career to have an Oh Crap Law named for me, which calls attention to every time someone says "content of character" or "tired feet" or "freedom ride" in a thread.

Lazy historical reference. Argument lost. Thread over!

182 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:24:01am

re: #180 Cannadian Club Akbar

D.A.R.E. resource officer charged in DUI crash pulling D.A.R.E. trailer.


Probably did it on a dare.

183 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:25:08am

re: #175 Obdicut

Hah, I had so much text there.

Lol I know what you mean. I have done the same thing - almost run out my frickin character limit. Then hit some random key instead of the right key and whoops, that goes that post.

Internet. Who doesn't love the internet.

184 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:26:16am

re: #183 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Lol I know what you mean. I have done the same thing - almost run out my frickin character limit. Then hit some random key instead of the right key and whoops, that goes that post.

Internet. Who doesn't love the internet.

Shopping malls and the post office.

185 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:29:32am

re: #181 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

1b) If it's wrong to use that word against Debbie Schlussel, then why should we not consider the use of Godwin card against her as well?

Because it's a historical reference that actually fits her position on genocide.

Godwin's law strikes a chord, perhaps an emotional chord, with us for a reason -- the reason is it's a form of logical fallacy.

It's not actually a form of logical fallacy. You know that, right?

186 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:31:23am

re: #179 Sergey Romanov

I didn't know that about the Nazi attempts to re-educate the Roma. Is there any particularly good source that deals with that in detail? I'd be interested. (Don't know if you remember, but my wife is part Roma.)

187 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:32:23am

re: #181 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

> If it's wrong to use that word against Debbie Schlussel, then why should we not consider the use of Godwin card against her as well?

Again, the cases are not analogous at all, IMHO. There are two issues: whether the Nazi references should be used at all (I fully understand those who say "no" and respect this position). And whether any groups should be excepted by default from such references if one does use them after all (this is where I will say a firm "no" since I don't find such a position coherent; I don't care about Debbie's ethnicity; I will call her what I call her regardless of whether she might be Jewish, Russian or Eskimo).

"Bitch", on the other hand, is an inherently sexist term, no matter how you apply it (although there are gradation, e.g. it's less serious when it's used jokingly). Same with "faggot" and some other words.

188 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:41:38am

re: #185 Obdicut

Because it's a historical reference that actually fits her position on genocide.

There are more accurate ones. Personally, I'm not invested in using it, or attached to calling Debbie Schlussel a bitch or some nazi to score vindication points.

You suggested you aren't, either. I believe you, even though you keep proffering rebuttals like the one above.

It's not actually a form of logical fallacy. You know that, right?

The reason we laugh at Godwin's Law ("law") is because its subjects never win arguments by labeling others Nazis. Even if some abstract logical case can be made for it. It doesn't win arguments, mainly because Nazi references are ahistorical, and knee-jerk.

Yes, she's pro-genocide. The Nazis carried out genocide. The Indian Wars carried out genocide. We've got ethnic pogroms and xenophobia-based murder in our own history.

There are better (though not as emotionally appealing) historical metaphors; pick one.

189 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:44:42am

Hitler was a vegetarian.

190 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:46:16am

re: #188 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

You suggested you aren't, either. I believe you, even though you keep proffering rebuttals like the one above.

I think it'd be great if we could use the historical analogy where it's appropriate without people immediately having an emotional reaction to it, but we can't, so I don't. I'm not sure how I can be clearer.

The reason we laugh at Godwin's Law ("law") is because its subjects never win arguments by labeling others Nazis.

But that has nothing to do with logical fallacies. In fact, claiming that someone's lost an argument because they've referenced the Nazis would be, in itself, a logical fallacy.

There are better (though not as emotionally appealing) historical metaphors; pick one.

On what grounds are they better? Using Andrew Jackson as a reference seems rather inferior, given how few people know that he advocated genocide and the fact that he's still celebrated as a hero of our country.

191 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:46:25am

re: #189 ralphieboy

Hitler was a vegetarian.

Liked dogs, hated cats.

192 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:47:29am

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car."
— Jack Handey

193 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:48:29am

re: #186 Obdicut

I didn't know that about the Nazi attempts to re-educate the Roma. Is there any particularly good source that deals with that in detail? I'd be interested. (Don't know if you remember, but my wife is part Roma.)

I've never heard a peep about Nazi attempts to reeducate anyone, really.

[Link: fcit.coedu.usf.edu...]

[Link: www.holocaust-trc.org...]

[Link: fcit.coedu.usf.edu...]

194 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:49:17am

And just to note, Godwin's law itself just observes that as an internet discussion continues, the likelihood of a comparison to Hitler or the Nazis approaches certainty. It doesn't actually say anything about winning or losing. That got added on later.

195 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:51:19am

re: #187 Sergey Romanov

> If it's wrong to use that word against Debbie Schlussel, then why should we not consider the use of Godwin card against her as well?

Again, the cases are not analogous at all, IMHO. There are two issues: whether the Nazi references should be used at all (I fully understand those who say "no" and respect this position). And whether any groups should be excepted by default from such references if one does use them after all (this is where I will say a firm "no" since I don't find such a position coherent; I don't care about Debbie's ethnicity; I will call her what I call her regardless of whether she might be Jewish, Russian or Eskimo).

"Bitch", on the other hand, is an inherently sexist term, no matter how you apply it (although there are gradation, e.g. it's less serious when it's used jokingly). Same with "faggot" and some other words.

Ridiculous argument.

There are two issues: whether the Nazi references should be used at all (I fully understand those who say "no" and respect this position)

Then you should have no quibble with what I've been saying for two hours.

For the sake of argument, forget Ms. Schlussel's ethnicity, and what she relates on her blog about her family history. Pretend she's just another random Euro American Christian white bottle blond with a big shrieky mouth and a blog. Forget I said anything about the ethnicity she brought up in the essay in question.

Point remains: she's not a nazi any more than she is a "bitch". She's not drawing on Nazi history, she's an American rwnj conservative xenophobe, like the rest of the bigots who inspired Anders.

Why is saying so such a big freakin' deal?

196 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:53:57am

re: #190 Obdicut

On what grounds are they better? Using Andrew Jackson as a reference seems rather inferior, given how few people know that he advocated genocide and the fact that he's still celebrated as a hero of our country.

9_9

That's my argument.

Why do you keep doing that, if you don't disagree?

If anyone else wants to use lazy historical references because they're more convenient, no one is stopping them.

I'm just saying why I'm not doing it.

You seem to agree on every other level, so what's the issue?

197 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:56:50am

You call this a flamewar?!?!
Freaking newbs.
///

198 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:57:07am

re: #196 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin


That's my argument.

Why do you keep doing that, if you don't disagree?

How is that your argument? Weren't you saying that we should use sources 'closer to home'?

If anyone else wants to use lazy historical references because they're more convenient, no one is stopping them.

I'm just saying why I'm not doing it.

Why do you call them 'lazy'?

You seem to agree on every other level, so what's the issue?

My issues right now are the following:

1. You repeatedly think that those using the analogy want to do so because of the emotional impact. That may be true of some, but for others, it is obviously the historical weight of it, not the emotional one, that's being referenced.

2. You seem to think Godwin's law is a logical fallacy.

3. You think that referencing Nazis in order to communicate a reference to genocidal intentions is 'lazy'.

4. That weird thing you do with your ear.

199 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:57:37am

Hitler was a dog-loving vegetarian repressed homosexual who liked Wagner operas.

This has nothing to do with the argument, I just like talking about Hitler.

200 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:57:42am

re: #198 Obdicut

2. You seem to think Godwin's law is describes a logical fallacy.

201 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:58:18am

re: #199 ralphieboy

This has nothing to do with the argument, I just like talking about Hitler.

Ah, you must work for the History Channel.

202 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 4:59:42am

1) Talking aobut Hitler/Nazis gets attention.

2) Lotsa people will do anything to gain attention
ergo,

Hitler/Nazis are going to get mentioned an awful lot

203 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:00:33am

re: #197 Varek Raith

You call this a flamewar?!?!
Freaking newbs.
///

There were volcanoes on the moon.
/

204 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:00:36am

re: #194 Obdicut

And just to note, Godwin's law itself just observes that as an internet discussion continues, the likelihood of a comparison to Hitler or the Nazis approaches certainty. It doesn't actually say anything about winning or losing. That got added on later.

Going Godwin on Debbie Schlussel may feel good for a minute, but is that the goal?

205 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:01:38am

re: #203 Cannadian Club Akbar

There were volcanoes on the moon.
/

Further proof against global warming. And why are they only on the dark side? No explanation for that.

206 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:01:49am

re: #203 Cannadian Club Akbar

There were volcanoes on the moon.
/

Obviously a Jewish plot to take over the world.
Or was it a grass knoll?

207 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:02:26am

re: #204 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Going Godwin on Debbie Schlussel may feel good for a minute, but is that the goal?

Do you really not get the whole 'It's not for emotional impact, it's a historical reference' thing? Or are you simply unable to believe that's possible?

208 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:05:59am

re: #186 Obdicut

I didn't know that about the Nazi attempts to re-educate the Roma. Is there any particularly good source that deals with that in detail? I'd be interested. (Don't know if you remember, but my wife is part Roma.)

I was wrong about the re-education part, confused it with policy towards homosexuals. However, the rest of what I wrote (about differences in policy) is correct. Here's a detailed overview:

[Link: academos.ro...]

Note that some Sinti Gypsies were considered by Himmler in 1942 to be fit even for a special Wehrmacht unit. As to sources, one of the foremost researchers of the question is Michael Zimmermann.

209 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:06:01am

re: #205 ralphieboy

Further proof against global warming. And why are they only on the dark side? No explanation for that.

Those so called 'Lunar Volcanoes' are clearly props built by Hollywood and the Freemasons.

210 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:07:26am

re: #209 Varek Raith

Those so called 'Lunar Volcanoes' are clearly props built by Hollywood and the Freemasons.

So, we went to the moon to built prop volcanoes but we faked the moon landing. These people need to get on the same page. Really.

211 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:08:15am

re: #210 Cannadian Club Akbar

So, we went to the moon to built prop volcanoes but we faked the moon landing. These people need to get on the same page. Really.

This should have been written in wingnut form. My bad.

212 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:08:20am

re: #198 Obdicut

How is that your argument? Weren't you saying that we should use sources 'closer to home'?

Why do you call them 'lazy'?

My issues right now are the following:

1. You repeatedly think that those using the analogy want to do so because of the emotional impact. That may be true of some, but for others, it is obviously the historical weight of it, not the emotional one, that's being referenced.

Everyone calling the other a Nazi makes that claim, that the nazis did this and that and so does this person, so shut up.

Doesn't make it so.

Debbie Schlussel isn't a Nazi. I don't know why it's so important to label her as one. This is what tells me there is some kind of weird emotional blockage happening.


2. You seem to think Godwin's law is a logical fallacy.

The actual quote was, "is a form of logical fallacy".

So what?


3. You think that referencing Nazis in order to communicate a reference to genocidal intentions is 'lazy'.

Lazy, unnecessary, emotionally-based not logically-based, ahistorical, potentially knee-jerk, etc.

What's the problem?

Tell me why I must convert my view to be precisely in line with yours, even though no one's requiring that of you.


4. That weird thing you do with your ear.

Uh-huh.

213 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:08:43am

re: #210 Cannadian Club Akbar

So, we went to the moon to built prop volcanoes but we faked the moon landing. These people need to get on the same page. Really.


Hey, I just come up with a nonsensical premise.
It ain't my job to fill in the details.
:P

214 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:09:50am

re: #213 Varek Raith

Hey, I just come up with a nonsensical premise.
It ain't my job to fill in the details.
:P

Every organization needs an "idea man". You're filling a vital role.

215 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:11:10am

re: #195 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Ridiculous argument.

Excuse me?

Then you should have no quibble with what I've been saying for two hours.

I must confess I skipped your battle with Obdi.

For the sake of argument, forget Ms. Schlussel's ethnicity, and what she relates on her blog about her family history.

Which are indeed irrelevant to what other crap that she writes.

Point remains: she's not a nazi any more than she is a "bitch". She's not drawing on Nazi history, she's an American rwnj conservative xenophobe, like the rest of the bigots who inspired Anders.

Why is saying so such a big freakin' deal?

Again, I said I respect a position of someone who doesn't use Nazi analogies on principle.

216 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:11:59am

re: #207 Obdicut

Do you really not get the whole 'It's not for emotional impact, it's a historical reference' thing? Or are you simply unable to believe that's possible?

I understand it all too well.

I don't agree with anyone's argument along those lines, including yours; in fact, I believe you when you say you don't wield the term against others in that way.

I am also suspect of this weird defense of doing so, coming from someone who, as I do, does not do it, yourself.

She's not a Nazi, she's a classic American xenophobic culturally conservative bigot.

217 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:12:20am

Your sister is pretty hot but your mom does that thing with her tongue....

218 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:12:40am

re: #215 Sergey Romanov

Again, I said I respect a position of someone who doesn't use Nazi analogies on principle.


Freaking grammar nazi.
/

219 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:12:45am

re: #212 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Everyone calling the other a Nazi makes that claim, that the nazis did this and that and so does this person, so shut up.

Huh? Who's telling who to shut up, here?

Debbie Schlussel isn't a Nazi. I don't know why it's so important to label her as one. This is what tells me there is some kind of weird emotional blockage happening.

I don't find it at all important to label her as one. I do think it's important to note that she's advocating genocide in a way no less total than the Nazis did. Is that a problem for some reason?

The actual quote was, "is a form of logical fallacy".

So what?

Did you mean that those who use Godwin's law-- as you did-- are committing a logical fallacy? Or that it describes a logical fallacy on the part of those making the comparison to Nazis?

Lazy, unnecessary, emotionally-based not logically-based, ahistorical, potentially knee-jerk, etc.

What's the problem?

You haven't explained why it's lazy, or supported that contention at all.

Tell me why I must convert my view to be precisely in line with yours, even though no one's requiring that of you.

Can you please point out where I ask you to convert your view?

220 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:13:35am

re: #217 Cannadian Club Akbar

Your sister is pretty hot but your mom does that thing with her tongue...

We talking about pick-up lines?

221 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:13:42am

re: #217 Cannadian Club Akbar

Your sister is pretty hot but your mom does that thing with her tongue...

4chan is that-a-way >
/

222 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:13:42am

re: #218 Varek Raith

Freaking grammar nazi.
/

Exactly.

223 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:13:53am

re: #215 Sergey Romanov

Excuse me?

Lol did I stutter?


I must confess I skipped your battle with Obdi.

It's not a battle, it's just a disagreement.


Again, I said I respect a position of someone who doesn't use Nazi analogies on principle.

That makes three of us.

224 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:14:36am

re: #216 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

I understand it all too well.

If you understand it, why do you continue to insist that those using it are doing so for emotional impact?

She's not a Nazi, she's a classic American xenophobic culturally conservative bigot.

Who are, amazingly, quite similar to Nazis in many ways, especially when they advocate genocide.

225 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:15:10am

re: #223 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Lol did I stutter?

No, I just find labeling an opponent's argument "ridiculous" without explaining why it is so to be bad style, is all.

226 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:16:08am
227 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:17:12am

Soup Nazi

228 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:18:34am

re: #227 NJDhockeyfan

The Dude should have considered whether he was making a lazy historical reference here, I guess:

229 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:18:44am

re: #226 Varek Raith

Image: nazi-zombies.jpg

Dod sno.

230 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:19:20am

re: #227 NJDhockeyfan

Joking about Nazis? The horror.

231 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:19:38am

re: #219 Obdicut

Huh? Who's telling who to shut up, here?

No one is telling anyone to shut up, relax. Don't be so eager to be offended.


I don't find it at all important to label her as one.

Neither do I. What's the problem?

Did you mean that those who use Godwin's law-- as you did-- are committing a logical fallacy? Or that it describes a logical fallacy on the part of those making the comparison to Nazis?

Godwin's Law isn't a law. It's a joke that points up lazy, reflexive, fallacious thinking that happens in emotionally-charged threads on the internet.

You haven't explained why it's lazy, or supported that contention at all.

I've explained this from the outset. But in your haste to say I'm accusing you of lying, or not understanding the conversation, or arguing with someone other than you, I guess you've missed it.

232 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:19:44am

re: #230 Sergey Romanov

Joking about Nazis? The horror.

NO SOUP FOR YOU

233 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:20:35am

re: #232 Varek Raith

NO SOUP FOR YOU

How about sno?

234 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:21:47am

re: #233 Sergey Romanov

How about sno?

Sno cone?
Image: tumblr_laaacnZAxw1qeo7ajo1_500.jpg

235 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:23:01am

re: #225 Sergey Romanov

No, I just find labeling an opponent's argument "ridiculous" without explaining why it is so to be bad style, is all.

Just read through the post for the explanation. Everyone here has their own posting style. Can I help it if mine isn't exactly the same as yours?

236 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:23:17am

Wanna get a nice hotel in Iran? Get arrested!

Minister Claims Iranian Prisons Are Like Hotels

Javad Shamghadari, the deputy chief of cinema at Iran’s Ministry of Culture, has said that contrary to reports, the conditions at Iranian prisons are actually very good.

ILNA cited Shamghadari saying: “I hope our journalist friends visit Evin Prison so they can see Evin is exactly like a hotel and in very good condition.”

Other Iranian officials have spoken up for Iranian prisons over the past two years. In the summer of 2009, when large numbers of protesters were being arrested all across the country, the head of prisons for Theran Province said: “Our cells are like hotel suites, and we have no solitary confinement.

Around the same time, the head of Parliament’s Social Commission, Soleyman Jafarzadeh, said: “The Islamic Republic, unlike other countries, even respects the dignity of criminals,” adding that Iranian prisons are like hotels.

I wonder whats on their room service menu?

237 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:23:52am

re: #231 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

No one is telling anyone to shut up, relax. Don't be so eager to be offended.

I'm not offended. I'm asking you, in this sentence of yours:

Everyone calling the other a Nazi makes that claim, that the nazis did this and that and so does this person, so shut up.

Who is being asked to shut up. I'm sorry, that sentence in particular really confused me. It seems to have little to do with what we're talking about. If you mean that people are asking Debbie Shussel to shut up, it's kind of true, though nobody's actually asking her directly, of course.


Godwin's Law isn't a law. It's a joke that points up lazy, reflexive, fallacious thinking that happens in emotionally-charged threads on the internet.

But it doesn't actually speak to whether the use was fallacious or not. That's my point. You seem to think that it implies a logical fallacy; it doesn't.

I guess you've missed it.

I think you've done a very poor job of explaining why it's lazy. You seem to be saying that using a more obscure reference that would be understood by fewer people would be superior-- such as to Andrew Jackson-- because it'd be more accurate. That still doesn't explain the 'lazy' part.

238 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:24:44am

Chilling Video Captures Man's Cries For Help As He Is Tased And Beaten To Death
[Link: www.pixiq.com...]


Kelly Thomas, a 37-year-old homeless man with schizophrenia, kept calling for his father as police beat and tased him repeatedly.

But his father, a retired Orange County sheriff’s deputy, was not around.

It wasn't until after Thomas slipped into a coma and was hospitalized with multiple injures that his father saw him.

And by then, it was too late. Thomas never recovered. The 160-pound man died five days after his run-in with Fullerton police.

...with before and after pics. Not for those with a weak constitution.

LA Times version:
[Link: latimesblogs.latimes.com...]

239 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:24:49am

re: #235 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Just read through the post for the explanation. Everyone here has their own posting style. Can I help it if mine isn't exactly the same as yours?

Which reminds me:

You asked me this:

Tell me why I must convert my view to be precisely in line with yours, even though no one's requiring that of you.

And I asked you if you could point out where I'd asked you to convert your view.

You never responded.

Are you able to point out where I've asked you to convert your view?

241 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:28:31am

re: #224 Obdicut

If you understand it, why do you continue to insist that those using it are doing so for emotional impact?

Use of the word "emotional" makes you emo, but not everyone has that problem.

These are emotional topics. Debbie Schlussel wrote a very emotional post.

This happens on the internet. Were it strictly a matter of historical significance, one could just reference our own history.


Who are, amazingly, quite similar to Nazis in many ways, especially when they advocate genocide.

Xenophobe nutbag history in the US predates the Nazis by a longshot.

242 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:29:08am
243 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:29:16am

Kitty cat named after the Führer...

She is cute, cuddly and very affectionate. Sadly, there’s a downside.

She also bears an uncanny resemblance to Adolf Hitler.

This six-week-old puss has been named Kitler by staff at Wood Green Animal Shelter in Godmanchester, Cambridgeshire, who took her in after she was found abandoned at a roadside.

244 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:29:56am

re: #235 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Just read through the post for the explanation. Everyone here has their own posting style. Can I help it if mine isn't exactly the same as yours?

Again, I found disagreement and explanation of disagreement, but not an explanation of why the argument itself was ridiculous. Not that I want to hear it, I've become bored with this whole topic. If anything, this may become an argument against using the Nazi comparisons: you'll spend more time fighting it out with people who find them inappropriate. ;)

245 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:30:58am

re: #241 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Use of the word "emotional" makes you emo, but not everyone has that problem.

No, it's just that you continue to ignore the actual point I'm making: the emotional impact is actually what interferes with its use as analogy, rather than being the point of it. For me, anyway, and, I suspect, for Sergey.

Xenophobe nutbag history in the US predates the Nazis by a longshot.

Yes, it does. Why is that relevant?

246 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:31:31am

To make one last point, people should not assume that the comparison is always to the post-mass murder Nazis. I find Hamas to be Nazi-like, as in, 1930s Nazi-like. Again, sue me.

247 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:31:52am

re: #244 Sergey Romanov

If anything, this may become an argument against using the Nazi comparisons: you'll spend more time fighting it out with people who find them inappropriate. ;)

Yeah, that's why I don't use them. People immediately begin to push back against it-- I think, based on what OhCrap is saying, on the assumption that it's being used as a cheap smear rather than an actual reference.

So it's really not worth it.

248 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:33:07am

re: #246 Sergey Romanov

To make one last point, people should not assume that the comparison is always to the post-mass murder Nazis. I find Hamas to be Nazi-like, as in, 1930s Nazi-like. Again, sue me.

Yeah, I think that's part of it; people who study the Nazis don't think about them just as the end-state Nazis.

And yes, Hamas is very Nazi-like, especially in the way they came to power, and in the way they're capitalizing on already-existing racism/bigotry in their society.

249 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:33:08am

re: #237 Obdicut

Who is being asked to shut up. I'm sorry, that sentence in particular really confused me.

Don't be confused. Try this: Everyone calling the other a Nazi makes that claim, that "the nazis did this and that and so does this person, so shut up."

I think you've done a very poor job of explaining why it's lazy.

Well, I think you're insistent on pretending not to understand why calling Debbie Schlussel "Goebbels" is bad form, on many levels, the main ones of which you yourself agree with. I think you are defending a position you yourself have said you don't even support.

Does that make it so?

Why are you doing that?

250 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:33:35am

re: #246 Sergey Romanov

To make one last point, people should not assume that the comparison is always to the post-mass murder Nazis. I find Hamas to be Nazi-like, as in, 1930s Nazi-like. Again, sue me.

How about some tea?
Image: ck_hitler_lg.jpg

251 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:35:04am

I have to go to Canton this week. I'll be wearing my seat belt and driving slightly under the speed limit:

Second Video Emerges Of Hot-Tempered Canton Police Officer
[Link: www.pixiq.com...]


Like the video that emerged earlier this month (second half of story), Harless can be heard threatening to kill the driver because of the gun that was found.

Unlike the last video, it is not clear whether the driver had a concealed weapons permit.

But the one thing that is clear is that Harless has a very hot temper and does nothing to deescalate a potential violent situation.

Here is just a small sample of what Harless told the man he pulled over.

"Do not move a muscle or I will put you in the grave."

"I’ll shoot you in the face and I’ll go to sleep tonight."

252 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:35:37am

re: #250 Varek Raith

How about some tea?
Image: ck_hitler_lg.jpg

What r u, a Hitler fan? /

253 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:36:41am

re: #249 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Don't be confused. Try this: Everyone calling the other a Nazi makes that claim, that "the nazis did this and that and so does this person, so shut up."

Oh, you mean if you're personally, in an internet discussion, calling someone else who is actually there a Nazi, rather than what we're talking about, which is someone using a Nazi reference for Debbie Schussel, who isn't part of the discussion?

Well, I think you're insistent on pretending not to understand why calling Debbie Schlussel "Goebbels" is bad form, on many levels, the main ones of which you yourself agree with.

Well, thank you for honestly admitting that you are claiming I'm 'pretending'.

I think you are defending a position you yourself have said you don't even support.

I'm saying that the comparison of people who act like Nazis or hold positions like the Nazis to the Nazis would be useful, if people such as yourself didn't always associate such comparisons with their more illogical, cheaper, and emotional variety.


Why are you doing that?

Why am I doing what?

254 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:37:00am

re: #244 Sergey Romanov

Again, I found disagreement and explanation of disagreement, but not an explanation of why the argument itself was ridiculous. Not that I want to hear it, I've become bored with this whole topic. If anything, this may become an argument against using the Nazi comparisons: you'll spend more time fighting it out with people who find them inappropriate. ;)

OTC, someone here who also finds it inappropriate is the one struggling the most.

So take it up with him.

It was originally a very small point, along the lines of why you don't think calling her a "bitch" is appropriate. Well, I don't think calling her Goebbels is appropriate, either, for multiple reasons.

Other people disagree with varying reasons/intensity. Big effing deal.

And yet, three hours later...

255 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:37:02am

re: #252 Sergey Romanov

What r u, a Hitler fan? /

Yes.
Looks good on the floor.
Image: funny_hitler_rug.jpg

256 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:37:15am

Let's pick someone else from history who committed genocide and use that instead of the "Nz" word.

There are many too choose from.

257 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:37:25am

re: #252 Sergey Romanov

What r u, a Hitler fan? /

He was a helluva dancer.

258 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:38:40am

re: #251 RogueOne

Put a Smith and Wesson bumper sticker in your window, though.

259 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:38:49am

re: #256 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Too? Too?

Fuck.

260 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:39:01am

re: #250 Varek Raith

How about some tea?
Image: ck_hitler_lg.jpg

zombie-hitler tea, the new nestea trial-brand.

261 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:39:08am

re: #236 NJDhockeyfan

We should send Arizona Sherrif Joe Arpaio over there to straighten things out for them...

262 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:40:14am

I love idiot douchebags that stop at every house on the block because they can't/won't read an address.

263 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:40:19am

re: #254 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

He likes the fighty-fighty.

HAVE YOU MET HIM?
/

264 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:40:24am

re: #259 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Too? Too?

Fuck.

Sounds like a hot new single.

"And coming in at #1 on the Billboard charts is "Too Too Fuck" by Fat Bastard and the Vegetarians. This one's smoking, folks!"

265 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:40:59am

re: #243 NJDhockeyfan

Kitty cat named after the Führer...


I thought Hitler hated cats. Or does Kitler hate hats?

266 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:41:00am

re: #261 ralphieboy

We should send Arizona Sherrif Joe Arpaio over there to straighten things out for them...

+1 for sending Sheriff Joe to an Iranian prison.

267 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:41:12am

re: #256 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Let's pick someone else from history who committed genocide and use that instead of the "Nz" word.

There are many too choose from.

Idi Amin Dada!

268 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:41:29am

re: #256 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Let's pick someone else from history who committed genocide and use that instead of the "Nz" word.

There are many too choose from.

Debbie is such a Mladic!

269 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:41:53am

re: #265 ralphieboy

I thought Hitler hated cats. Or does Kitler hate hats?

Ditler hoved logs.

270 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:42:58am

re: #250 Varek Raith

How about some tea?
Image: ck_hitler_lg.jpg

Every nation has its bad apples.

271 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:43:32am

Hitler reacts to the news that Osama bin Laden was killed

272 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:43:36am

Hilter lovod dgos

273 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:45:14am

re: #259 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Too-too is Russian for choo-choo.

I don't know why I wrote that.

274 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:46:28am

re: #273 Sergey Romanov

Too-too is Russian for choo-choo.

I don't know why I wrote that.

Image: memes-in-soviet-russia-do-soviet-russia-jokes-tell-you.jpg

275 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:46:32am

re: #273 Sergey Romanov

276 Varek Raith  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:48:49am

I'm out for the count.
Later.

277 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:49:38am

Walt Disney Cartoon - Hitler's Children Education For Death

278 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:50:12am

re: #268 Sergey Romanov

Debbie is such a Mladic!

Hey, you know what group Mladic's views remind me of?

/

279 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:50:50am

re: #253 Obdicut

Oh, you mean if you're personally, in an internet discussion, calling someone else who is actually there a Nazi, rather than what we're talking about, which is someone using a Nazi reference for Debbie Schussel, who isn't part of the discussion?

Yeah, you don't understand at all. That didn't even make sense.


Well, thank you for honestly admitting that you are claiming I'm 'pretending'.

Last hour, I didn't. But the more you contradict yourself the more it appears you're just desperate to win some argument on the internet.


I'm saying that the comparison of people who act like Nazis or hold positions like the Nazis to the Nazis would be useful, if people such as yourself didn't always associate such comparisons with their more illogical, cheaper, and emotional variety.

You need to make up your mind.

We both agree against using Nazi analogies "at almost any point" (your #175). We've been doing this for 3 hours, now.

But now you are saying, "the comparison of people who act like Nazis or hold positions like the Nazis to the Nazis would be useful, if people such as yourself didn't always associate such comparisons with their more illogical, cheaper, and emotional variety."

So which is it?

280 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:50:52am

re: #278 Obdicut

Hey, you know what group Mladic's views remind me of?

/

Quakers? Amish? Serbs?

281 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:51:30am

re: #278 Obdicut

Hey, you know what group Mladic's views remind me of?

/

Why, Hamas!

/

282 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:53:03am

re: #267 NJDhockeyfan

Idi Amin Dada!

Ol' fd up classic...

283 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:54:14am

re: #280 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Quakers? Amish? Serbs?

Shriners!

284 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:54:33am

re: #282 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Ol' fd up classic...

[Video]

Where is this from?

285 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:54:46am

re: #268 Sergey Romanov

Debbie is such a Mladic!

Debbie is a Breivik.

286 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:54:49am

re: #279 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Yeah, you don't understand at all. That didn't even make sense.

Why are you talking about people being told to shut up after having been compared to a Nazi, in a thread where no one has been told to shut up, and no one present in the thread has been compared to a Nazi?


Last hour, I didn't. But the more you contradict yourself the more it appears you're just desperate to win some argument on the internet.

Can you explain why this applies to me, but not to you?

We both agree against using Nazi analogies "at almost any point" (your #175). We've been doing this for 3 hours, now.

But now you are saying, "the comparison of people who act like Nazis or hold positions like the Nazis to the Nazis would be useful, if people such as yourself didn't always associate such comparisons with their more illogical, cheaper, and emotional variety."

So which is it?

It's both. I'm against using them because it leads to endless discussions like this with people who aren't willing to or capable of distinguishing between an ahistorical and emotional use of the Nazi analogy with one that has actual meaning and reason.

By the way, for the third time, you said this:

Tell me why I must convert my view to be precisely in line with yours, even though no one's requiring that of you.

Can you or can you not point out where I required you to convert your view to be precisely in line with mine?

287 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:55:44am

re: #284 Sergey Romanov

Where is this from?

I first heard it on Dr. Demento, probably circa 1981.

288 NJDhockeyfan  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:56:04am

re: #282 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Ol' fd up classic...

[Video]

A classic? How about this one...

289 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 5:57:27am

I'd like to coin a new internet law:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of some person in the thread adopting a stance that replicates that of the Nazis or Hitler approaches 1 (100%).

290 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:03:52am

In last night's music thread, b_sharp got me thinking of the Cowboy Junkies. What a great song this is...

291 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:05:21am

re: #290 Cannadian Club Akbar

My favorite Cowboy Junkies song:

292 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:05:42am

re: #286 Obdicut

Why are you talking about people being told to shut up after having been compared to a Nazi, in a thread where no one has been told to shut up, and no one present in the thread has been compared to a Nazi?

Nobody has been told to shut up, so just relax.

Can you explain why this applies to me, but not to you?

I suppose because I acknowledge we agree on why not to call people Nazis. Or at least we did. Back when you said you don't, yourself.

Swell. Neither do I. You've shifted that view, though. I say it's in an effort to score a point, and at this point has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic from 3 hours ago.

It's both. I'm against using them because it leads to endless discussions like this with people who aren't willing to or capable of distinguishing between an ahistorical and emotional use of the Nazi analogy with one that has actual meaning and reason.

By the way, for the third time, you said this:

Can you or can you not point out where I required you to convert your view to be precisely in line with mine?

For the 17th time, we basically agree on this issue.

You're not going to get me to rationalize calling Debbie Schlussel or anyone like her "Goebbels" as a good idea. I have multiple, personal reasons for not doing so. You seem to yourself, but for the sake of this thread...agree with them, agree with only some of them, agree with none of them. It doesn't matter.

It's just not going to happen, whatever knots you twist yourself in, in this strange effort.

293 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:07:58am

re: #291 Obdicut

I'm listening to Come Calling (his song) now..

294 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:08:24am

re: #289 Obdicut

I'd like to coin a new internet law:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of some person in the thread adopting a stance that replicates that of the Nazis or Hitler approaches 1 (100%).

What's this new internet law based on?

Can you give an example?

295 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:09:29am

What pisses me off is when my house was broken into, they stole my CD player with my Cowboy Junkies and 10,000 Maniacs CDs in it. Fuckers.

296 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:09:44am

re: #288 NJDhockeyfan

Lol I remember watching that in syndication.

297 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:11:13am

re: #290 Cannadian Club Akbar

In last night's music thread, b_sharp got me thinking of the Cowboy Junkies. What a great song this is...

[Video]

My favorite Cowboy song:

298 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:11:20am

GOProud and Birchers ousted as CPAC co-sponsors (David Horowitz survives vote)

Long considered a fringe group, the John Birch Society’s sensationalist accusations (such as saying Dwight Eisenhower was a “dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy“) once prompted William F. Buckley to effectively banish the group from the conservative movement.

Various blocs of CPAC board members find both GOProud and the Birchers highly offensive — and for entirely different reasons.

299 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:11:39am

re: #295 Cannadian Club Akbar

What pisses me off is when my house was broken into, they stole my CD player with my Cowboy Junkies and 10,000 Maniacs CDs in it. Fuckers.

Someone did you a favor. You owe them a thank-you card.

300 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:15:44am

There needs to be an IM feature added. I had to bite my tongue on the best insult because it would have offended everyone but the intended recipient. Hurts my feelings.

301 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:15:58am

re: #292 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Nobody has been told to shut up, so just relax.

I'm not concerned about whether or not anyone has been told to shut up. I'm asking why you brought up the concept, since it doesn't seem to apply here.

I suppose because I acknowledge we agree on why not to call people Nazis. Or at least we did. Back when you said you don't, yourself.

No, we don't. You think that we shouldn't do it for a panoply of reasons that I'm not sure I fully understand, but that include wanting to use analogies closer to home and thinking that the phrase is used as an emotional call-out. I think that we shouldn't in general because some people are incapable of distinguishing between the times when it's being used as a historical reference or an emotional attack. In that regard, I'm actually replicating Godwin's position.

For the 17th time, we basically agree on this issue.

No, we don't agree that I asked you to convert your view, as you claimed I did.

In the course of this thread, you've asked why I'm insisting you convert your view (despite no having done so), you've claimed that I'm lying-- sorry, 'pretending', implied I'm contradicting myself, called me defensive, told me to relax, etc. etc. This is kind of tiresome, and should not play a part in any actual argument.

The point I'm making is actually, as I said above, the same one that Godwin made: casual references and comparisons to Hitler and the Nazis are bad precisely because it takes away from the legitimacy of times when the comparison is apt, such as with Hamas, Mladic, or, indeed, Shussel's views on what should be done with Muslims.

However, I go a step further than Godwin, and say that because of people who are incapable, for whatever reason, of distinguishing those apt times from the inappropriate times, and who interpret every comparison as an inapt one, I avoid the analogies completely.

In this case, I'm defending the appropriateness of Sergey's analogy even when I wouldn't have used it myself (because it leads to these boring discussions), partially because I fully think that advocating the genocide of an entire group is quite Nazi-like and so the analogy is fine, and partially because Sergey is a noted anti-Holocaust Denier researcher, and it pains me to see people ignoring what he has to say on the subject by broad application of simplistic internet rules.

302 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:16:19am

re: #299 RogueOne

Someone did you a favor. You owe them a thank-you card.

I was in a mellow mood. Otherwise it would have been my TOOL collection.

303 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:17:10am

re: #300 RogueOne

There needs to be an IM feature added. I had to bite my tongue on the best insult because it would have offended everyone but the intended recipient. Hurts my feelings.

Chicken shit.
/

304 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:18:45am

re: #294 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

What's this new internet law based on?

Observation, as was Godwins. Given that it's stated as 'approaching 100%', Godwin's law was always tongue-in-cheek; it's an unprovable assertion. You do get that, right?


Can you give an example?

Just one example of someone on some thread on the internet holding a position that's similar to that of Hitler or the Nazis? Sure. Debbie Shussel's position that all Muslims should be killed, which is similar to Hitler's (final) position that all Jews should be killed.

That one was pretty easy, since it involved Debbie Shussel, though.

305 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:19:28am

re: #303 Cannadian Club Akbar

Chicken shit.
/

I've learned that innocent sarcasm is sometimes hard to detect....and some people are sensitive. I'm learning to take their concerns and feelings into consideration when posting. I'm growing as a person and becoming a better member of our rainbow covered planet.

306 Cannadian Club Akbar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:21:13am

re: #305 RogueOne

I've learned that innocent sarcasm is sometimes hard to detect...and some people are sensitive. I'm learning to take their concerns and feelings into consideration when posting. I'm growing as a person and becoming a better member of our rainbow covered planet.

Ok. Can I get you a tampon?
/

307 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:21:46am

re: #305 RogueOne

I've learned that innocent sarcasm is sometimes hard to detect...and some people are sensitive. I'm learning to take their concerns and feelings into consideration when posting. I'm growing as a person and becoming a better member of our rainbow covered planet.

Pussy.

308 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:22:33am

re: #306 Cannadian Club Akbar

re: #307 Obdicut

You guys are starting to hurt my feelings.

309 wee fury  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:25:15am

It must be posted -- the greatest cowboy song ever . . .


;-)
310 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:25:41am

Heh. How about the Jorge Louis Borges version of Godwin's law?

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of some person in the thread referencing Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius approaches 1 (100%).

311 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:26:59am

re: #310 Obdicut

Heh. How about the Jorge Louis Borges version of Godwin's law?

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of some person in the thread referencing Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius approaches 1 (100%).

You're too optimistic. ;)

312 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:28:22am

re: #311 Sergey Romanov

You're too optimistic. ;)

Heh. It's just as true as Godwin's, just with a much shallower slope.

Maybe I should use the Library of Babel instead, to get the recursive point across.

313 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:28:48am

BTW, Debbie updated that page:

Rot In Hell, Osama Bin Laden. One down, 1.8 billion to go. . . many of ‘em inside U.S. borders, with the U.S. government at all levels kissing their asses. [Despite #HAMAS terrorist co-conspirator CAIR Action Network's claims to the contrary, I never called for killing 1.8 billion Muslims. Try reading, liars. When 1.8 billion Muslims stop supporting HAMAS and Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad and the Muslim Brotherhood, etc., then we will have succeeded. But that won't happen.]
314 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:30:11am

The witch hunt continues....
Issa launches investigation into Obama's new fuel economy standards

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) launched an investigation Friday into a series of closed-door meetings between Obama administration officials and major automakers that resulted in beefed-up vehicle fuel economy standards.
...
n the letters, which were obtained by The Hill, Issa says the administration’s efforts to negotiate the fuel economy standards “raise serious concerns.” The new rules, which were announced Friday by President Obama, will also limit consumer choice, Issa says.

“I am concerned about the agreements lack of transparency, the failure to conduct an open rulemaking process, as well as the potential for vehicle cost increases on consumers, and negative impact on American jobs,” the letters say.
...
The plan, Obama said, is “the single most important step we’ve ever taken as a nation to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.”

315 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:30:13am

re: #313 Sergey Romanov

Heh. Because when someone dies, and someone says "one down, x to go", obviously they meant they hope X other people change their views.

That's leaving aside the demonstrably false claim that 1.8 billion Muslims support Hamas and Hezbollah, of course.

316 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:30:26am

re: #313 Sergey Romanov

Yeah, we can't read. How Goebbelsian.

317 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:31:09am

re: #314 Killgore Trout

Why isn't Issa concerned about how many pieces of legislation are actually written by lobbyists?

Hell, I bet he's submitted bills like that.

318 Kronocide  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:31:22am

re: #212 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin


Debbie Schlussel isn't a Nazi. I don't know why it's so important to label her as one.

No, she's a fascist. She can't be a Nazi until Muslims are deported or murdered.

The last several days I've had Radiohead lyrics in my head specifically from all the ABB commentary on the blogs:

When I am king you will be first against the wall

Schlussel would never fire a rifle but would be writing OpEds justifying lining up xxxx against the wall.

We really are on the brink here. This is not a Godwin invocation.

319 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:34:11am

This brings a question to my mind. They call themselves freedom fighters. I guess so, in the sense of "fighting the [i.e. against] freedom".

320 Kronocide  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:35:06am

re: #315 Obdicut

Heh. Because when someone dies, and someone says "one down, x to go", obviously they meant they hope X other people change their views.

That's leaving aside the demonstrably false claim that 1.8 billion Muslims support Hamas and Hezbollah, of course.

OMFG.

Is there some contest going on to out nutter each other on the RW blogs? This is insane.

321 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:35:32am

re: #301 Obdicut

I'm not concerned about whether or not anyone has been told to shut up. I'm asking why you brought up the concept, since it doesn't seem to apply here.

No, we don't. You think that we shouldn't do it for a panoply of reasons that I'm not sure I fully understand, but that include wanting to use analogies closer to home and thinking that the phrase is used as an emotional call-out. I think that we shouldn't in general because some people are incapable of distinguishing between the times when it's being used as a historical reference or an emotional attack. In that regard, I'm actually replicating Godwin's position.

So you are now a Godwin literalist? Lol!


No, we don't agree that I asked you to convert your view, as you claimed I did.

Wordsmithing. I didn't claim you asked me that.

You wondered why I'd suggest that was your goal, and I think it still holds true.

You're simply out to win some argument, even if it means contradicting your own stated position, or distorting mine.


In the course of this thread, you've asked why I'm insisting you convert your view

Lol I did not ask any such thing.

(cont'd)

322 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:36:21am

...

323 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:37:33am

re: #314 Killgore Trout

The witch hunt continues...
Issa launches investigation into Obama's new fuel economy standards

...

Yes. Because better fuel economy is BAD for Americans! We want people to spend more money at the pump! We want to stay HIGHLY dependent on OPEC!!11ty Free MARKET!!11ty

324 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:37:52am

re: #321 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

So you are now a Godwin literalist? Lol!

I don't know what you mean by a Godwin literalist. You were the one who brought up Godwin's law.

Lol I did not ask any such thing.

Here's what you said:

Tell me why I must convert my view to be precisely in line with yours, even though no one's requiring that of you.

Why did you ask that of me, if you didn't think I was insisting you convert your view?

325 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:39:39am

re: #317 Obdicut

Why isn't Issa concerned about how many pieces of legislation are actually written by lobbyists?

Hell, I bet he's submitted bills like that.

Of course he's just fishing for a reason to scuttle the agreement that would lower oil consumption to make the oil companies happy.

326 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:41:35am

re: #304 Obdicut

Godwin's law was always tongue-in-cheek; it's an unprovable assertion. You do get that, right?

I said as much in #231, or did you miss it, in your hasty rush to score a point?

Just one example of someone on some thread on the internet holding a position that's similar to that of Hitler or the Nazis? Sure. Debbie Shussel's position that all Muslims should be killed, which is similar to Hitler's (final) position that all Jews should be killed.

That one was pretty easy, since it involved Debbie Shussel, though.

Here in the real world, there are plenty of them, it's true.

327 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:42:30am

re: #321 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

You're simply out to win some argument, even if it means contradicting your own stated position, or distorting mine.

By the way: Attempting to be psychic via TPC/IP is always a stupid idea. I fully believe you're attempting to represent your views honestly and forthrightly, though I have some problems with your style. Why on earth can't you accord me the same respect?

328 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:45:51am

re: #326 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

I said as much in #231, or did you miss it, in your hasty rush to score a point?

Well, then feel free to interpret my law in the same vein; I'm not sure why you'd ask me for proof for something unproveable.

The point I'm making about Godwin is that he's far closer to my side of the argument than yours. He was noting that casual analogies to the Nazis are in preponderance. He was not saying that legitimate comparisons to Nazis or their ideologies shouldn't be made.

Those who advocate genocide are Nazi-like. They may be more like other genocidal nutjobs, but that doesn't take away from the fact that they are Nazi-like.

329 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:49:44am

re: #324 Obdicut

I don't know what you mean by a Godwin literalist. You were the one who brought up Godwin's law.

Yet, now you claim to "replicate" it, even as you acknowledge its tongue in cheek nature, something I did many moons ago?

Why did you ask that of me, if you didn't think I was insisting you convert your view?

Groan, we just went over this.

You're not going to get me to think calling DS "Goebbels" is appropriate or a good idea. I disagreed with Sergey's usage, but didn't attack him for it; yet you've chosen to go on the defensive, basing your reasoning on crap I didn't even say.

My views on why dropping Nazi references shouldn't be done just don't match up, precisely (thus the use of that term.) I don't have a problem reconciling that, but looks like you do.

330 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:49:58am

re: #325 Killgore Trout

Of course he's just fishing for a reason to scuttle the agreement that would lower oil consumption to make the oil companies happy.

It's pathetic to argue that the oil industry is truly a free market. OPEC is a downright monopoly. American oil companies benefit from the government tit through tax incentives and tax breaks; assistance through the BLM, Department of Interior, etc.; defense spending to provide security for Gulf oil (i.e. OPEC); and so on. I would like to see how much tax money we spend in order to provide the oil that eventually powers our vehicles. I'm sure that it's in the billions. If it were a real free market gasoline would probably be around 10 to 12 dollars a gallon.

331 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:50:20am

On a totally different topic, this is how foolish those who support austerity programs and cutting the amount we borrow are:

[Link: modeledbehavior.com...]

Now is one of the absolutely cheapest points in US history for the US to borrow money. It would make far more sense to borrow a shitton of money now and spend it on infrastructure improvements than to pay for those improvements over time with tax revenue.

332 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:52:34am

re: #329 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Yet, now you claim to "replicate" it, even as you acknowledge its tongue in cheek nature, something I did many moons ago?

Yes. It is also tongue-in-cheek in my replication. I would have thought that was obvious.


Groan, we just went over this.

No, we didn't. You haven't explained why you asked me, directly, this:

Tell me why I must convert my view to be precisely in line with yours, even though no one's requiring that of you.

That very clearly implies that I hold the position that you must convert your view to be precisely in mine with yours.

If it doesn't, then explain how it doesn't.

333 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:53:20am

re: #39 Obdicut

Really, her article is so beyond the pale I don't know what to call her. Insulting the dead. Comparing them to inhuman, evil beings. Saying that they deserved to die and she feels no sympathy for them.

It's not a surprise, given that her response to Osama Bin Laden's death was to openly hope for the death of every Muslim man, woman, and child in the entire world.

Genocidal freak.

Islam isn't race, so genocide does quite work. But she did call for the death of a religion and its adherents and that makes her filth.

334 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:53:39am

re: #331 Obdicut

It would also make sense for the government to borrow money and spend it at an enormous clip because it's the velocity of money that's most important for getting out of a recession, and there's many programs-- like many of those that the GOP wants to cut-- that are the absolute best for that application, like food stamps, aid to single mothers, etc.

335 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:54:47am

re: #332 Obdicut

re: #329 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

You aren't bored? /

PS: OK, I know that's what people thought about my mini-debate with Obdi. :P

336 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:55:02am

re: #333 Dark_Falcon

Islam isn't race, so genocide does quite work. But she did call for the death of a religion and its adherents and that makes her filth.

Yeah, I'm not sure what you'd call calling for the death of everyone of a specific religion. I guess it's a form of democide. However, the Nazis certainly would have treated a non-ethnically-Jewish person who practiced Judaism the same as they did an ethnic Jew, so I think that the term is broad enough to cover it in this usage.

337 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:55:10am

re: #330 Gus 802

It's pathetic to argue that the oil industry is truly a free market. OPEC is a downright monopoly. American oil companies benefit from the government tit through tax incentives and tax breaks; assistance through the BLM, Department of Interior, etc.; defense spending to provide security for Gulf oil (i.e. OPEC); and so on. I would like to see how much tax money we spend in order to provide the oil that eventually powers our vehicles. I'm sure that it's in the billions. If it were a real free market gasoline would probably be around 10 to 12 dollars a gallon.

Also add in the cost of roads and highways which are a massive part of the public infrastructure required to drive said vehicles. Part of which is payed through fuel taxes payed by the consumer and not the oil companies. It's the people that are supporting this mode of transportation. Always have. The oil companies are basically a mooch in the general scheme of things and they have more money than God which they make through profits supported by "the people".

338 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:55:40am

re: #333 Dark_Falcon

Islam isn't race, so genocide does quite work. But she did call for the death of a religion and its adherents and that makes her filth.

Look up the genocide def, DF.

339 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:55:44am

re: #335 Sergey Romanov

I'm delaying running an errand returning a bunch of clothes. And going out into the heat of the outside. Yuch.

340 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:55:44am

Anywho. I see I walked into a squabble.

Gobbles. Minister of poultry.

//

341 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:56:29am

Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

342 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:56:31am

re: #340 Gus 802

Then there's Mr. Hilter.

343 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:56:51am

re: #327 Obdicut

By the way: Attempting to be psychic via TPC/IP is always a stupid idea.

Shoving words in my mouth via browser and ISP ain't too bright, either.

I fully believe you're attempting to represent your views honestly and forthrightly, though I have some problems with your style. Why on earth can't you accord me the same respect?

You may not like my "style", "manner" or any of those things, and I disagree with some of your line of argument in this particular conversation. But I have not disrespected you. In fact, I'm disappointed to read a line like that from you.

You don't have to fully agree with my views, and that's fine with me.

It's just a disagreement on a point. They happen on the internet.

344 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:57:51am

My neighbor, who wears coke-bottle glasses, is outside in shorts w/black socks and mowing his yard with a weed-eater. I'm going to have to move.

Image: 6a2ddc430e050e990fc42b570d09671e.jpg

345 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:58:39am

re: #314 Killgore Trout

The witch hunt continues...
Issa launches investigation into Obama's new fuel economy standards

Well, Justice handed Issa an opening with Operation Fast and Furious, and he's running with it. The fact that that operation was a fuck-up from the get go is causing Issa to look into other closed-door matters to see what can be dug up. This particular avenue, however, is unlikely to yield anything. At most he'll try to spin his findings into an "OUTRAGEOUS OUTRAGE!!1", but he shouldn't even do that. It'll just waste credibility he needs.

346 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:59:16am

re: #343 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Shoving words in my mouth via browser and ISP ain't too bright, either.

But I haven't. You've refused to explain some words-- these, in particular:

Tell me why I must convert my view to be precisely in line with yours, even though no one's requiring that of you.

It is not my fault you said that.

But I have not disrespected you. In fact, I'm disappointed to read a line like that from you.

By claiming that I'm 'pretending' to hold a position I don't actually believe in, you're claiming I'm being dishonest. By claiming I'm only arguing to win an argument on the internet, you are definitely disrespecting me.

If you don't think those things are disrespectful-- implying dishonesty and pettiness-- then I don't really know what to say. If that's not disrespect to you than we have immensely different standards of behavior.

347 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:59:18am

re: #336 Obdicut

Not any Judaism. I think they would spare practitioners of non-rabbinical forms. Karaites and such.

348 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 6:59:49am

re: #344 RogueOne

My neighbor, who wears coke-bottle glasses, is outside in shorts w/black socks and mowing his yard with a weed-eater. I'm going to have to move.

Image: 6a2ddc430e050e990fc42b570d09671e.jpg

Bubbles is about the only reliable member of that bunch of jackoffs.

349 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:00:26am

re: #332 Obdicut

Yes. It is also tongue-in-cheek in my replication. I would have thought that was obvious.

No, it wasn't obvious, at all.

If it doesn't, then explain how it doesn't.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

350 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:00:31am

re: #347 Sergey Romanov

Not any Judaism. I think they would spare practitioners of non-rabbinical forms. Karaites and such.

Yeah, but they'd try to kill Walter Sobchak, the bastards.

351 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:00:45am

"At the same time, the Nazis had serious reservations towards the Karaites. SS Obergruppenfuhrer Gottlob Berger wrote on November 24, 1944:

Their Mosaic religion is unwelcome. However, on grounds of race, language and religious dogma... Discrimination against the Karaites is unacceptable, in consideration of their racial kinsmen [Berger was here referring to the Crimean Tatars]. However, so as not to infringe the unified anti-Jewish orientation of the nations led by Germany, it is suggested that this small group be given the opportunity of a separate existence (for example, as a closed construction or labor battalion)..."

352 darthstar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:01:06am

Mornin' pestilent ones.

353 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:02:03am

Chart of the day: Debt Ceiling Increases by President
Image: omb-graph-on-debt-ceiling-use.jpg

354 darthstar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:03:12am

I see we're all having fun with the internet's favorite topic, so I'll be on my way. I have the fun challenge of getting two medium sized dogs, a travel bag, and my wife's bicycle for her triathlon tomorrow into/onto the Smart Car today...and I have to go in there somewhere too. It should be interesting driving that thing with a bike rack on the back.

355 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:03:47am

re: #349 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

That's not an explanation, at all.

My views on why dropping Nazi references shouldn't be done just don't match up, precisely (thus the use of that term.) I don't have a problem reconciling that, but looks like you do.

Yes, you and I think differently. That's why we're having an argument. Why you think that means that I'm insisting that you convert your views, I have no idea.

You seem to be saying that because I'm arguing my point, I'm trying to force you to convert your views. I am trying to convince you-- and anyone else reading-- of the correctness of my argument. Is that what you mean?

356 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:04:12am

re: #346 Obdicut

But I haven't.

You basically started out doing that, defending Sergey from offenses never committed.

You've refused to explain some words-- these, in particular:

9_9

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

357 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:04:30am

re: #345 Dark_Falcon

Well, Justice handed Issa an opening with Operation Fast and Furious, and he's running with it. The fact that that operation was a fuck-up from the get go is causing Issa to look into other closed-door matters to see what can be dug up. This particular avenue, however, is unlikely to yield anything. At most he'll try to spin his findings into an "OUTRAGEOUS OUTRAGE!!1", but he shouldn't even do that. It'll just waste credibility he needs.

I have doubts about the Fast an Furious thing. The GOP is more concerned with discrediting the investigation because what we learned about gun trafficking.

358 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:05:38am

re: #356 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

You basically started out doing that, defending Sergey from offenses never committed.

Can you demonstrate that, please? You mean where I said that this wasn't a casual use of the Nazi analogy?

359 darthstar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:07:10am

re: #357 Killgore Trout

I have doubts about the Fast an Furious thing. The GOP is more concerned with discrediting the investigation because what we learned about gun trafficking.

And Issa has been dropping investigations lately because they "don't fit the narrative" (his last big investigation of Democratic corruption turned up no corrupt Democrats, but id did uncover a couple of corrupt Republicans and he had to hit the brakes fast)

360 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:07:55am

What have I wrought! /

361 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:08:00am

re: #357 Killgore Trout

I have doubts about the Fast an Furious thing. The GOP is more concerned with discrediting the investigation because what we learned about gun trafficking.

Pretty much. The GOP doesn't care if it worked. Or if it could work. All they want is to make the Obama administration look bad. It's all cynical partisan politics. During the Bush White House days we would have been calling Issa and the rest of the GOP "un-American" and "treasonous". They've essentially become the right wing version of Code Pink. While the Democrats actually learned right away to shun the Code Pinkers and Move On (for the most part) the GOP has actually embraced their reactionary base and see it as way towards victory in 2012.

So to repeat. The GOP doesn't care if it worked. Or if it could work. All they want is to make the Obama administration look bad. It's all cynical partisan politics.

362 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:08:18am

re: #330 Gus 802

Do not forget that US oil companies regularly meet at the White House to plan our national energy strategy.

Because these talks are highly sensitive, they are also classified.

What do you call it when memebers of an industry meet in secret to plan stragety?

Starts with car- and ends with -tel...

363 darthstar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:10:45am

Sorry...got distracted by non-hitler topic... Here's a good theme song for everyone though...enjoy.

364 lawhawk  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:10:53am

re: #362 ralphieboy

Starts with cab - and ends with al. /

365 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:11:22am

re: #355 Obdicut

That's not an explanation, at all.

Yes, you and I think differently. That's why we're having an argument.

So what?

People on the internet think differently, have clashing styles, even agree on many points and differ on others.

b
f
d

Why you think that means that I'm insisting that you convert your views, I have no idea.

You seem to be saying that because I'm arguing my point, I'm trying to force you to convert your views. I am trying to convince you-- and anyone else reading-- of the correctness of my argument. Is that what you mean?

Don't bring "anyone else reading" into it -- your beef right now is with ME.

To reiterate: you're not capable of forcing me into anything. 5 hours of going round and round about virtually nothing should be your indicator.

Yes, you have a variant position from mine.

Big deal. Your arguments in this thread are not only a defense of a throwaway comment by another poster, they're also the vindication of Godwin's Law, lol an internet joke that's not even a law.

Are you going to quote that sentence again?

366 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:12:45am

Eh.

367 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:12:53am

I would add another corollary: once Hitler/Nazis have been mentioned in comparison to anyone/thing, the possibility of the thread going off into a tedious tailspin also approaches 100%

368 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:14:06am

re: #357 Killgore Trout

I have doubts about the Fast an Furious thing. The GOP is more concerned with discrediting the investigation because what we learned about gun trafficking.

Untrue. And that goes double since we've learned the FBI, on request from the ATF, cleared gun purchases by convicted felons. So the laws didn't work and the dealers sold the weapons because the ATF wanted the laws to fail and the dealers to sell them. And people got killed. Hell, the ATF didn't even tell Mexico's AG till one of his prosecutors was killed by a gun the ATF let get away. No, Killgore, investigating F&F is entirely legitimate.

369 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:15:33am

re: #358 Obdicut

Can you demonstrate that, please? You mean where I said that this wasn't a casual use of the Nazi analogy?

Your full statement, #301:

"In this case, I'm defending the appropriateness of Sergey's analogy even when I wouldn't have used it myself (because it leads to these boring discussions), partially because I fully think that advocating the genocide of an entire group is quite Nazi-like and so the analogy is fine, and partially because Sergey is a noted anti-Holocaust Denier researcher, and it pains me to see people ignoring what he has to say on the subject by broad application of simplistic internet rules."

370 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:16:01am

re: #362 ralphieboy

Do not forget that US oil companies regularly meet at the White House to plan our national energy strategy.

Because these talks are highly sensitive, they are also classified.

What do you call it when memebers of an industry meet in secret to plan stragety?

Starts with car- and ends with -tel...

The strategic oil reserves... If it were not for the inherent "collectivist" nature of American society the oil industry would be making less profits and hardly able to survive in a truly free market. There is no "free" in the free market of the oil industry. It simply does not exist. It's just another "Gordon Gekko" type propaganda created to make American's feel good or, once again, clueless. And this is not a conspiracy at all. It's how things work in the USA. Bahrain anyone?

371 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:16:46am

Okay,,, it's 10:15 here ,, already hotter than hell,,, been outside for 2 hours now doing yardwork,, BUT

can't mow the backyard yet because the grass is still too wet from the dew,,, SO ,, I have to wait at least another hour which means it will be even FRAKKIN HOTTER

So ,,, your mission, if you decide to accept it, is to entertain me for that hour!!
/

372 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:17:56am

re: #371 sattv4u2

Okay,,, it's 10:15 here ,, already hotter than hell,,, been outside for 2 hours now doing yardwork,, BUT

can't mow the backyard yet because the grass is still too wet from the dew,,, SO ,, I have to wait at least another hour which means it will be even FRAKKIN HOTTER

So ,,, your mission, if you decide to accept it, is to entertain me for that hour!!
/

You can try to sort out the argument Obdicut is having with OCSP.

373 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:18:55am

re: #328 Obdicut

The point I'm making about Godwin is that he's far closer to my side of the argument than yours.

Godwin's Law is no law, it's a joke.

374 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:19:00am

re: #371 sattv4u2

Okay,,, it's 10:15 here ,, already hotter than hell,,, been outside for 2 hours now doing yardwork,, BUT

can't mow the backyard yet because the grass is still too wet from the dew,,, SO ,, I have to wait at least another hour which means it will be even FRAKKIN HOTTER

So ,,, your mission, if you decide to accept it, is to entertain me for that hour!!
/

OK. Let's have a yardcare safety session:

When you're trimming the holly, don't let your left index finger get in front of the guard, slicing through the meat, but missing the bone.

375 kirkspencer  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:19:15am

re: #354 darthstar

I see we're all having fun with the internet's favorite topic, so I'll be on my way. I have the fun challenge of getting two medium sized dogs, a travel bag, and my wife's bicycle for her triathlon tomorrow into/onto the Smart Car today...and I have to go in there somewhere too. It should be interesting driving that thing with a bike rack on the back.

Are you sure you shouldn't be putting a car rack on the bike for that combination?

376 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:20:19am

re: #372 Dark_Falcon

You can try to sort out the argument Obdicut is having with OCSP.

Lets do the math

Saturday morning
+
I'm in a good mood
equals

I'LL PASS!!

377 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:20:24am

re: #357 Killgore Trout

I have doubts about the Fast an Furious thing. The GOP is more concerned with discrediting the investigation because what we learned about gun trafficking.

They aided buyers and intentionally let thousands of illegal guns cross the border resulting in the deaths of a couple hundred people on both sides of the border. I think that should be enough to piss off people:

'Fast And Furious' Gun Trafficking Operation Slammed By ATF Agents
[Link: www.huffingtonpost.com...]


The operation was "a perfect storm of idiocy," Carlos Canino, a senior ATF agent in Mexico, said in the report. Other current and former ATF agents testified at the hearing that the operation violated basic agency protocols.

It was a plan put together by Mr. Dumb and Mr. Dumber and we need to know who those people were that thought this was brilliant so we can remove them before they come up with another great plan.

378 kirkspencer  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:20:27am

re: #374 Decatur Deb

OK. Let's have a yardcare safety session:

When you're trimming the holly, don't let your left index finger get in front of the guard, slicing through the meat, but missing the bone.

Absolutely. If you're going to do it, do it right - get that bone. //

379 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:21:19am

re: #378 kirkspencer

Absolutely. If you're going to do it, do it right - get that bone. //

roasts are always tasier with the bone in

380 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:21:25am

re: #374 Decatur Deb

OK. Let's have a yardcare safety session:

When you're trimming the holly, don't let your left index finger get in front of the guard, slicing through the meat, but missing the bone.

NOW you tell me!!

Honey ,, cancel the call to 911 ,, Decatur told me what to do (albeit, too late!!)

381 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:21:43am

re: #368 Dark_Falcon

Untrue. And that goes double since we've learned the FBI, on request from the ATF, cleared gun purchases by convicted felons. So the laws didn't work and the dealers sold the weapons because the ATF wanted the laws to fail and the dealers to sell them. And people got killed. Hell, the ATF didn't even tell Mexico's AG till one of his prosecutors was killed by a gun the ATF let get away. No, Killgore, investigating F&F is entirely legitimate.

I'm not sure if you have all the facts correct but the fact that both the ATF and FBI use similar techniques shows that it's probably a common procedure in these types of investigations. Sometimes they let the crime (drug sales, gun sales, whatever) happen to see where the trail leads. I haven't been following the story but last I checked it looked to me like the GOP just didn't like the investigations into the gun trade.

382 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:22:15am

re: #377 RogueOne

They aided buyers and intentionally let thousands of illegal guns cross the border resulting in the deaths of a couple hundred people on both sides of the border. I think that should be enough to piss off people:

'Fast And Furious' Gun Trafficking Operation Slammed By ATF Agents
[Link: www.huffingtonpost.com...]

It was a plan put together by Mr. Dumb and Mr. Dumber and we need to know who those people were that thought this was brilliant so we can remove them before they come up with another great plan.

Guns don't kill people, Zetas kill people.

383 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:22:39am

re: #373 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Godwin's Law is no law, it's a joke.

No, it has value. The Nazi analogy is heavily overused and Godwin's Law is a way to limit it. The problem is that with the Norway massacre we're dealing with a Nazi-type fascist, and those who side with him in part (like Debbie Schussel [spits]) and also using thinking of a type Hitler would have approved of. So its not that Godwin's Law is a joke, it just is mostly inoperative in this particular case.

384 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:24:00am

re: #372 Dark_Falcon

You can try to sort out the argument Obdicut is having with OCSP.

Oh, you should have been around for the "does Santa exist" thread a couple mornings ago.

A bit lighter than this one, though there was a concurrent one on the existence of God.

Today, it's Godwin's Law. I do love the internet.

385 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:24:07am

re: #380 sattv4u2

NOW you tell me!!

Honey ,, cancel the call to 911 ,, Decatur told me what to do (albeit, too late!!)

Did the trimmer trick yesterday. Had the foresight to just marry a nurse.

386 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:25:06am

re: #383 Dark_Falcon

The Nazi analogy is heavily overused and Godwin's Law is a way to limit it.

OTOH,,,, as a way to "win" the debate, even when Godwins law is used properly, some scream about it being used in that situation

(damn ,, did I just get sucked into this debate??)

387 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:25:55am

re: #377 RogueOne

They aided buyers and intentionally let thousands of illegal guns cross the border resulting in the deaths of a couple hundred people on both sides of the border. I think that should be enough to piss off people:

'Fast And Furious' Gun Trafficking Operation Slammed By ATF Agents
[Link: www.huffingtonpost.com...]

It was a plan put together by Mr. Dumb and Mr. Dumber and we need to know who those people were that thought this was brilliant so we can remove them before they come up with another great plan.

Then do what Bush would have done. Claim that any public hearings would reveal information sensitive to the operation of existing intelligence activities during a time of war. Then, make everyone that's holding those hearing feel guilty by having surrogate pundits exclaim that those that support such hearings are treasonous and unpatriotic. We are at war damn it!

"//"

388 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:26:18am

re: #385 Decatur Deb

Did the trimmer trick yesterday. Had the foresight to just marry a nurse.

Schmart!!!!

I was about to give up. Took me almost 15 minutes to get it started. I think I "primed" it one too many times,. either that, or it's due for a tune up

389 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:26:31am

re: #386 sattv4u2

(damn ,, did I just get sucked into this debate??)

MWAHAHAHA! Ia ia Cthulhu fhtagn! *runs away crazy-eyed and laughing*

390 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:28:13am

re: #383 Dark_Falcon

No, it has value. The Nazi analogy is heavily overused and Godwin's Law is a way to limit it. The problem is that with the Norway massacre we're dealing with a Nazi-type fascist, and those who side with him in part (like Debbie Schussel [spits]) and also using thinking of a type Hitler would have approved of. So its not that Godwin's Law is a joke, it just is mostly inoperative in this particular case.

My point has been it's not even just Hitler who had that mentality, it's people right here, right now.

I.e. the people --Spencer/Geller/Lind/various rwnj CTs -- Breivik is copy/pasting in the first place. If Ms. Schlussel's name isn't among them, it is now, with that last filthy screed of hers.

391 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:28:33am

re: #381 Killgore Trout

I'm not sure if you have all the facts correct but the fact that both the ATF and FBI use similar techniques shows that it's probably a common procedure in these types of investigations. Sometimes they let the crime (drug sales, gun sales, whatever) happen to see where the trail leads. I haven't been following the story but last I checked it looked to me like the GOP just didn't like the investigations into the gun trade.

The problem is that they weren't trailing the guns. They sometimes followed them to a safehouse, but after that they disappeared till they showed up in Mexico. So all that was proven was that guns were being run into Mexico, which we already knew and which no one denied. The operation provided arms to the Zetas and utterly failed to uncover the network they use to move weapons. That rates a vigorous investigation.

392 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:28:43am

re: #385 Decatur Deb

Did the trimmer trick yesterday. Had the foresight to just marry a nurse.

That guard is there for a reason....government regulation. See what good they are?//

393 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:29:50am

I enjoyed the hitler joke part. Lets do that again.

394 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:30:14am

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of Godwin being mentioned approaches 1 (100%).

395 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:32:18am

Whoa. Wut? A Choctaw just flew by. Kind of low and off to the east. Heading towards San Jose.

Image: id_ch34choctaw_01_700.jpg

396 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:32:31am

Here's that bastard. Happy. Laughing.

Image: Mike_Godwin_at_Wikimedia_2010.jpg

*yells at clouds*

397 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:33:05am

re: #365 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

To reiterate: you're not capable of forcing me into anything. 5 hours of going round and round about virtually nothing should be your indicator.

I'm not trying to force you into anything, and I have no clue why you think I am. I have no clue why you think that implying that I'm being dishonest and petty isn't offensive, either. Or why you think that I don't know that Godwin's law is a joke-- albeit a joke with a strong point.

I've made my case perfectly well: Nazi analogies to people who act like Nazis or hold views like the Nazis are perfectly defensible. The reason not to make them is because people will, tiresomely, argue forever against using any Nazi analogies at all, and so the point of the analogy gets lost. You've provided a very thorough demonstration of that.

Next time we talk, try to avoid the frivolous accusations of defensiveness, pretense, and pettiness. It doesn't do anything to strengthen your position.

Now it's time for me to finally run those errands.

398 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:33:27am

re: #395 Gus 802

Whoa. Wut? A Choctaw just flew by. Kind of low and off to the east. Heading towards San Jose.

Image: id_ch34choctaw_01_700.jpg

You just blew their cover!!
/

399 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:33:49am

re: #395 Gus 802

Whoa. Wut? A Choctaw just flew by. Kind of low and off to the east. Heading towards San Jose.

Image: id_ch34choctaw_01_700.jpg

Quick, are there chemtrails? Close the windows.

400 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:34:45am

re: #395 Gus 802

Whoa. Wut? A Choctaw just flew by. Kind of low and off to the east. Heading towards San Jose.

Image: id_ch34choctaw_01_700.jpg

Maybe an airshow?

401 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:35:07am

re: #399 Obdicut

Maybe they're searching for that B-29 carrying 2 A-bombs that crashed last night...

//

402 darthstar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:35:26am

re: #373 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Godwin's Law is no law, it's a joke.

Quoted for truth. But even though "Godwin's Law" was penned as an internet joke, it's become as accepted in our vocabulary as Murphy's Law - also not an actual law.

403 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:35:33am

I wonder if 1000 years from now Godwin will be thought of as Adolf's second name.

Like here this piktshe:

Image: PBF209-Now_Showing.jpg

404 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:37:49am

re: #391 Dark_Falcon

....after that they disappeared till they showed up in Mexico. So all that was proven was that guns were being run into Mexico, which we already knew and which no one denied.

I seem to recall about 2 years ago Fox and the wingnuts were outraged when the Mexican government was complaining about American guns fueling gang violence in Mexico.
Apr 2, 2009
Fox Report: Mexican guns not from US

405 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:38:04am

re: #403 Sergey Romanov

I wonder if 1000 years from now Godwin will be thought of as Adolf's second name.

Like here this piktshe:

Image: PBF209-Now_Showing.jpg

Damn you

I'm in the middle of a book about WW2

You just spoiled the ending!
/

406 ReamWorks SKG  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:38:36am

Speaking of Christianity, Greetings from Rome!

Image: 5990221489_1dbbd6249e_b.jpg

We went to the Vatican today, but the Pope wasn't there. I guess he's busy writing his sermon for tomorrow. He has very nice stuff, and a great ceiling!

407 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:39:09am

re: #406 reuven

Speaking of Christianity, Greetings from Rome!

Image: 5990221489_1dbbd6249e_b.jpg

We went to the Vatican today, but the Pope wasn't there. I guess he's busy writing his sermon for tomorrow. He has very nice stuff, and a great ceiling!

Super nice!

408 darthstar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:39:26am

re: #406 reuven

He has very nice stuff, and a great ceiling!

You slept with the Pope?

409 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:40:46am

re: #404 Killgore Trout

I think there's a big difference between guns in Mexico being "sourced" from the US as opposed to guns in Mexico being "sourced" from the US gov't through some operation the justice dept tried

410 ReamWorks SKG  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:40:46am

re: #408 darthstar

You slept with the Pope?

I think I'm too old for him. The Swiss Guards he uses must be between the ages of 18 and 21.

411 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:41:39am

re: #406 reuven

Speaking of Christianity, Greetings from Rome!

Image: 5990221489_1dbbd6249e_b.jpg

We went to the Vatican today, but the Pope wasn't there. I guess he's busy writing his sermon for tomorrow. He has very nice stuff, and a great ceiling!

The hot chick sitting behind you, taking the picture

Did you get her number?
/

412 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:41:46am

re: #400 Dark_Falcon

Maybe an airshow?

Yeah. Just flying by for no particular reason either. They have the Hiller Aviation Museum around here which is mostly a helicopter museum. They had their airshow a couple of week ago. When I first got here I saw a B-24 Liberator fly by. That's been about my limit of warbird viewings. Other than two other modern C-130s, on KC-135 heading NW, 3 Blackhawks heading south along the valley, and too many 737s (MD-80s, FedEx DC-10s, A330, A318/20s) on approach to count. Then there's the training flights that go by during the weekdays which are typically Cessnas. Also some fly bys on July 4th with a bunch of RVs and then there was the Amber Alert which was another helicopter airshow in itself.

413 ReamWorks SKG  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:41:54am

He also has a nice Piazza.

Image: 5990794300_a0a8a47b95_b.jpg

414 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:43:18am

re: #413 reuven

He also has a nice Piazza.

Image: 5990794300_a0a8a47b95_b.jpg

The hot chick in the white shorts walking to your right , carrying the kid

Did you get her number?
/

415 darthstar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:44:06am
416 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:44:10am

re: #397 Obdicut

I'm not trying to force you into anything, and I have no clue why you think I am. I have no clue why you think that implying that I'm being dishonest and petty isn't offensive, either. Or why you think that I don't know that Godwin's law is a joke-- albeit a joke with a strong point.

I've made my case perfectly well: Nazi analogies to people who act like Nazis or hold views like the Nazis are perfectly defensible. The reason not to make them is because people will, tiresomely, argue forever against using any Nazi analogies at all, and so the point of the analogy gets lost. You've provided a very thorough demonstration of that.

I see it differently. You have your own POV, I have mine; we don't see precisely eye to eye about calling Debbie Schlussel "Goebbels", and that's just the way the ball bounces.


Next time we talk, try to avoid the frivolous accusations of defensiveness, pretense, and pettiness. It doesn't do anything to strengthen your position.

But I'm not trying to win anything. That, I leave to the folks like yourself, who end up arguing against crap not even said, instead of reading what's been written over, and over, and over again.

So what is gained by traipsing off after some dismissive sentence?

Anybody can pull that old move.

417 ReamWorks SKG  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:44:28am

The Colosseum Tour Guide said that the Colosseum was funded with the booty they acquired from looting the second temple, and it was built by slaves they captured in Israel. And then she mentioned that all the marble in the Vatican came from the Colosseum.

It's nice to hear them affirming this after all these years.

418 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:44:38am

re: #414 sattv4u2

The hot chick in the white shorts walking to your right , carrying the kid

Did you get her number?
/

All you can think about are chicks' ... numbers! Yeah, numbers.

419 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:44:45am

re: #404 Killgore Trout

I seem to recall about 2 years ago Fox and the wingnuts were outraged when the Mexican government was complaining about American guns fueling gang violence in Mexico.
Apr 2, 2009
Fox Report: Mexican guns not from US

[Video]

The ATF recognized the obvious need of more large caliber weapons in Mexico and set up shop.....

[Link: www.huffingtonpost.com...]


The operation, known as “Fast and Furious,” began in 2009 when the bureau essentially began allowing low-level cartel members to buy guns at Arizona gun stores -- the plan was to track the guns and tail the buyers back to their leaders in Mexico.

The plan didn't quite work out as expected. According to a report issued by a Republican congressional committee on Tuesday, more than 100 guns from the operation have turned up at crime scenes in Mexico or have been seized from people affiliated with the cartels, and the bureau has allegedly lost track of hundreds of others.

Their next excuse will be they were doing their best to spur the local economy.

420 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:45:29am

re: #404 Killgore Trout

I seem to recall about 2 years ago Fox and the wingnuts were outraged when the Mexican government was complaining about American guns fueling gang violence in Mexico.
Apr 2, 2009
Fox Report: Mexican guns not from US

[Video]

Most of the cartel guns aren't from the US. About 20% are, so guns from the US are a factor in the fighting but not the driving factor. And previously the administration had put about a talking point that the guns trafficked in from the US were 70% of the cartels guns. When an error of that magnitude is made, its not be paranoid to ask aloud why it was made.

421 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:46:11am

re: #413 reuven

He also has a nice Piazza.

Image: 5990794300_a0a8a47b95_b.jpg

There's some dude standing in the way in all your pictures.

422 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:46:14am

This moron thinks praying on the street should be illegal.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

423 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:46:49am

re: #418 Sergey Romanov

All you can think about are chicks' ... numbers! Yeah, numbers.

first things first

424 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:47:28am

re: #417 reuven

And then she mentioned that all the marble in the Vatican came from the Colosseum.
recycling program

425 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:47:37am

re: #422 Obdicut

This moron thinks praying on the street should be illegal.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Only if it blocks traffic. They're probably better off praying on the sidewalk.

//

426 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:47:39am

re: #416 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

But I'm not trying to win anything. That, I leave to the folks like yourself, who end up arguing against crap not even said, instead of reading what's been written over, and over, and over again.

Ah, I see. When you argue, you're not trying to win, but I am.

That's priceless.

So what is gained by traipsing off after some dismissive sentence?

Anybody can pull that old move.

They can also pull the move of coming back for another post after getting dressed. That one's a sick move!

You're a little too internet for me, I think.

427 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:47:56am

re: #419 RogueOne

The ATF recognized the obvious need of more large caliber weapons in Mexico and set up shop...

[Link: www.huffingtonpost.com...]

Their next excuse will be they were doing their best to spur the local economy.

The ATF is spinning. They haven't a choice, really. Admitting "We fouled up and got a lot of people killed" isn't really an option if you want to keep your job.

428 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:48:20am

re: #418 Sergey Romanov

All you can think about are chicks' ... numbers! Yeah, numbers.

Wonderboy: The man who would rather do math than have sex.


The man that would rather play guitar than have sex.

429 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:49:16am

re: #427 Dark_Falcon

The idea that they got a lot of people killed is predicated on the idea that it's availability of guns that leads to murders, rather than the will to murder.

Which is, I thought, something that gun rights owners were vehemently against.

Do you think that those murdered would have not been murdered if those particular guns hadn't been available for purchase?

430 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:50:11am

re: #422 Obdicut

This moron thinks praying on the street should be illegal.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Another person who doesn't understand the meaning of the 1st Amendment. I wish they were fewer. We seem to be clue-batting them all the time and my arms get tired.

431 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:51:25am

re: #422 Obdicut

This moron thinks praying on the street should be illegal.

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

You know my position. It's OK as long as it doesn't interfere. Like this:

Image: 0007s2rf.jpg

432 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:51:50am

re: #406 reuven

Speaking of Christianity, Greetings from Rome!

Image: 5990221489_1dbbd6249e_b.jpg

We went to the Vatican today, but the Pope wasn't there. I guess he's busy writing his sermon for tomorrow. He has very nice stuff, and a great ceiling!

Sweet! Are you enjoying the food?

433 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:52:55am

Pencils don't kill people

People WITH pencils kill people!!
[Link: www.boston.com...]

BAN THE TICONDEROGA #2

434 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:53:03am

re: #429 Obdicut

The idea that they got a lot of people killed is predicated on the idea that it's availability of guns that leads to murders, rather than the will to murder.

Which is, I thought, something that gun rights owners were vehemently against.

Do you think that those murdered would have not been murdered if those particular guns hadn't been available for purchase?

Tough to say. Some would have died anyways, and some of the guns would have been trafficked anyways. But the ATF operation made things worse, and it failed to accomplish its mission.

435 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:53:10am

re: #426 Obdicut

Ah, I see. When you argue, you're not trying to win, but I am.

That's priceless.

In this instance, yeah. Others, nah.

436 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:54:30am

re: #431 Sergey Romanov

You know my position. It's OK as long as it doesn't interfere. Like this:

Image: 0007s2rf.jpg

How would the "interfere"?

Looks like those stepping stones would make it easier to cross the street!!

///

437 ReamWorks SKG  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:55:06am

We secretly squoze one off in here. Shhh!

Image: 5990827388_178bded1cc_b.jpg

That's the great ceiling I was talking about. (Warning! Nudity!)

438 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:55:21am

re: #436 sattv4u2

Tsk, tsk. ;)

439 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:55:27am

re: #434 Dark_Falcon

Tough to say. Some would have died anyways, and some of the guns would have been trafficked anyways. But the ATF operation made things worse, and it failed to accomplish its mission.

I'm not so sure it was a failure. It raised awareness that our gun laws are fueling gang violence in neighboring countries. It's a pretty serious problem. We don't want to be a destabilizing force in the Western Hemisphere.

440 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:56:00am

re: #437 reuven

We secretly squoze one off in here. Shhh!

Image: 5990827388_178bded1cc_b.jpg

That's the great ceiling I was talking about. (Warning! Nudity!)

LIAR ,,, you have clothes on!!
(well,,, in the photo ,,, I don't know about right now!!!)

441 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:56:26am

re: #437 reuven

We secretly squoze one off in here. Shhh!

Image: 5990827388_178bded1cc_b.jpg

That's the great ceiling I was talking about. (Warning! Nudity!)

Why did all those nude folks get up on the ceiling? ///

442 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:58:04am

re: #430 Dark_Falcon

Another person who doesn't understand the meaning of the 1st Amendment. I wish they were fewer. We seem to be clue-batting them all the time and my arms get tired.

Anybody see Bryan Fischers' little smackdown of Herman Cain?

Poor Cain...last week it was Richard Land. Now it's Bryan [Link: www.politico.com...] (warning-hatemonger site.) If he's not careful, Bryan just might rescind that bestowal of the only authentic black man in the race, tsk tsk. e_e

443 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:58:07am

re: #441 Sergey Romanov

Why did all those nude folks get up on the ceiling? ///

They're high!

444 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:58:20am

re: #434 Dark_Falcon

Tough to say. Some would have died anyways, and some of the guns would have been trafficked anyways. But the ATF operation made things worse, and it failed to accomplish its mission.

They have a large string of indictments at the moment, which was part of the mission. And since it's tough to say, you can't actually make the claim that what the ATF did got a lot of people killed.

It is really hard to see an argument here that isn't that availability of guns leads to more gun violence.

445 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:58:53am

re: #443 sattv4u2

They're high!

Nude and high. What could possibly go wrong?

446 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:59:05am

Alright. Really doing my errands now. Blech. So freaking hot out there.

447 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:59:35am

re: #445 Sergey Romanov

Nude and high. What could possibly go wrong?

flunk out of college??

oh ,, wait,,, I was,, and I didn't!!!

448 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:59:44am

re: #436 sattv4u2

How would the "interfere"?

Looks like those stepping stones would make it easier to cross the street!!

///

Great. Now you've got me thinking about the Monkees.

449 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:59:58am

More related videos....
Aug 25, 2009
LIES about U S A Mexico Gun Trafficking


Apr 2, 2009
FNC - 83% of Mexican drug cartel guns could not be traced back to America

This is why the ATF and FBI launched their investigations. This is also why the wingnuts want to discredit the investigations.

450 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:00:18am

re: #448 Gus 802

Great. Now you've got me thinking about the Monkees.

Thats because you're bananas!

451 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:01:07am

re: #450 sattv4u2

Thats because you're bananas!

Now don't you go aping people who use cheap puns.

452 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:01:33am

re: #439 Killgore Trout

I'm not so sure it was a failure. It raised awareness that our gun laws are fueling gang violence in neighboring countries. It's a pretty serious problem. We don't want to be a destabilizing force in the Western Hemisphere.

Project Fast and Furious: We secretly switched our gun laws with decaffeinated folgers crystals...Hey Mexico, Lets see what happens!

It was a dumb idea that got people killed. We aren't talking a few dozen weapons they could keep track of, we're talking thousands of guns with no plan on how to track where they went until they turned up used in a crime scene.

453 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:01:53am

re: #437 reuven

We secretly squoze one off in here. Shhh!

Image: 5990827388_178bded1cc_b.jpg

That's the great ceiling I was talking about. (Warning! Nudity!)

Interesting. I was there as a kid (maybe 8-9 years old) I remember it being bigger than that but I guess I was just smaller then.

454 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:01:56am

re: #439 Killgore Trout

I'm not so sure it was a failure. It raised awareness that our gun laws are fueling gang violence in neighboring countries. It's a pretty serious problem. We don't want to be a destabilizing force in the Western Hemisphere.

Did you even read what I wrote?:

Issa found cases where the FBI let guns sales go through that the laws already on the books would have prevented. Said guns were only followed a short distance, and then allowed to slip away. They were not seen again by law enforcement till they turned up in cartel hands in Mexico.

Sorry about the bolding but I felt it needed to make a point. The operation let the laws fail and then proceeded to fail at its primary objective. That constitutes an utter failure, Killgore.

455 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:02:25am

re: #451 Sergey Romanov

Now don't you go aping people who use cheap puns.

Why not

She's the gorilla my dreams!

456 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:02:56am

The Supreme Court should totally strike Godwin's law down.

//

457 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:03:48am

re: #442 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Anybody see Bryan Fischers' little smackdown of Herman Cain?

Poor Cain...last week it was Richard Land. Now it's Bryan [Link: www.politico.com...] (warning-hatemonger site.) If he's not careful, Bryan just might rescind that bestowal of the only authentic black man in the race, tsk tsk. e_e

You linked to the same Politico story twice, I think.

458 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:03:59am

re: #452 RogueOne

Project Fast and Furious: We secretly switched our gun laws with decaffeinated folgers crystals...Hey Mexico, Lets see what happens!

[Video]It was a dumb idea that got people killed. We aren't talking a few dozen weapons they could keep track of, we're talking thousands of guns with no plan on how to track where they went until they turned up used in a crime scene.

My theory is this. It isn't much of a theory but... Fast and Furious was a dumb idea. Let ATF figure out what the feck they did wrong and LET'S MOVE ON! I am sick and tired of watching those asshole on the Hill turn every little mistake perpetrated by the government in order to create political theater not for the benefit of the people but for the benefit of their party or themselves. It's bullshit. Enough already with the useless hearings in DC.

459 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:05:01am

re: #455 sattv4u2

Why not

She's the gorilla my dreams!

Mon... get a key... I mean a clue...
////

460 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:05:32am

re: #458 Gus 802

Enough already with the useless hearings in DC.

You're going to put a lot of lawyers and TV "news" personalities out of work!!!
//(somewhat)

461 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:05:51am

The reason for the gun traffic is simply that the cartels use the weapons to protect their core business: human and drug trafficking.

Until we reform our immigration and drug laws, we are fighting a hydra.

462 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:06:04am

re: #454 Dark_Falcon

Did you even read what I wrote?:

Issa found cases where the FBI let guns sales go through that the laws already on the books would have prevented. Said guns were only followed a short distance, and then allowed to slip away. They were not seen again by law enforcement till they turned up in cartel hands in Mexico.

Sorry about the bolding but I felt it needed to make a point. The operation let the laws fail and then proceeded to fail at its primary objective. That constitutes an utter failure, Killgore.

Yes, I did read what you wrote, I just don't know how accurate your facts are. I don't think the Fast and Furious thing is a huge scandal so I haven't really spent a lot of time checking the claims. Worst case scenario is that is was a botched investigation. Nothing more.

463 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:06:28am

re: #445 Sergey Romanov

Nude and high. What could possibly go wrong?

Been there. Not sure where I was or how I got there, but I've been there.

464 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:06:51am

re: #461 ralphieboy

The reason for the gun traffic is simply that the cartels use the weapons to protect their core business: human and drug trafficking.

Until we reform our immigration and drug laws, we are fighting a hydra.

Very much agreed.

465 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:07:39am

And enough already with this stupid Drug War. Enough! We've spent trillions over the years. People want to smoke pot. Legalize pot once and for all and treat it like any other commodity. The Feds have not moral basis for keeping it illegal and in the same class as heroin. Screw it. Heard enough already. And if we spent half as much we did in Afghanistan and Iraq on Mexico maybe Mexico wouldn't be as screwed up as it is.

466 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:10:07am

and now for something really important:

Peyton Manning 'willing to take less' money
[Link: eye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com...]


However, Manning told the Indianapolis Star on Friday that he's willing to take less money if it means the Colts can retain more players and remain aggressive in the open market.

"While I appreciate Jim Irsay offering to make me the highest-paid player, I told him I’d rather he save that money and keep whoever it is ... Joe Addai, Charlie Johnson, whoever that may be," Manning said, per the Indianapolis Star. "I'm willing to take less than they’ve offered if they are going to take that money to keep players we need to keep and go get other players.

"All I want is for them to have the cap and the cash to keep the players they want to keep and to sign other players."

467 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:11:24am

re: #466 RogueOne

and now for something really important:

Peyton Manning 'willing to take less' money
[Link: eye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com...]

Brady did the same thing a number of years ago

RESULT ,, , Super Bowl Champs

(and in the end, his next contract, the one he's under now,, was worth MEGA Moolah)

468 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:11:34am

re: #466 RogueOne

"All I want is for them to have the cap and the cash to keep the players they want to keep and to sign other players."

You mean he suuports cap and trade?

469 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:11:50am

And get rid of the ATF while we're at it. What the hell. Alcohol, tobacco and firearms? WTF The FBI should be handling this not another stupid bureaucracy. We already have the ATF, CIA, FBI, DEA, NSA, HS, SS, EIEIO. Consolidate.

470 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:13:32am

re: #457 Dark_Falcon

You linked to the same Politico story twice, I think.

You're right, pimf.

Richard Land rebukes Herman Cain

Fischer: Herman Cain owed no apology to anyone

471 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:14:00am

re: #467 sattv4u2

Brady did the same thing a number of years ago

RESULT ,, , Super Bowl Champs

(and in the end, his next contract, the one he's under now,, was worth MEGA Moolah)

Yeah, the other big news:

Ochocinco has first practice with Brady, Patriots
[Link: www.cbssports.com...]

the cold war between with pats is still on despite the jeff saturday -bob kraft hug.

472 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:14:32am

re: #456 Sergey Romanov

The Supreme Court should totally strike Godwin's law down.

//

Needs landmark decision.

473 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:14:35am

re: #469 Gus 802

And get rid of the ATF while we're at it. What the hell. Alcohol, tobacco and firearms? WTF The FBI should be handling this not another stupid bureaucracy. We already have the ATF, CIA, FBI, DEA, NSA, HS, SS, EIEIO. Consolidate.

Can't recall the comedian, but he did a bit about WHY Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms were under the same office

he's talking on the phone to an ATF rep

"I was just wondering, what type of gun should I get if I prefer Vodka"

pause (as he "listens" to the rep)

"Well,,I smoke Marlboros, why do you ask?"

474 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:14:39am

re: #469 Gus 802

And get rid of the ATF while we're at it. What the hell. Alcohol, tobacco and firearms? WTF The FBI should be handling this not another stupid bureaucracy. We already have the ATF, CIA, FBI, DEA, NSA, HS, SS, EIEIO. Consolidate.

The ATF should be code for the best 3 day festival ever.

475 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:14:43am

The damn ATF should have died when prohibition died. It was created under the Volstead Act. It's a joke. Here we are in 2011 using some dumb department created in the 1920s. Move on. Modernize. Stop being a bunch of Federalist traditionalists.

476 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:15:34am

re: #471 RogueOne

bad preview...."cold war with the pats"...

477 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:19:55am

re: #476 RogueOne

bad preview..."cold war with the pats"...

It'll heat up the night of Dec 4th

Dec 04 IND @ NE Gillette Stadium 8:20 PM

478 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:22:46am

re: #477 sattv4u2

It'll heat up the night of Dec 4th

Dec 04 IND @ NE Gillette Stadium 8:20 PM

December. I'm rooting for global warming.

479 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:24:42am

re: #478 RogueOne

December. I'm rooting for global warming.

You should

iirc, Indy doesn't have a great record
A) outdoors
B) in December
C) in a northeast city

480 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:25:25am

I'm waiting to see if yuppy neighbor fires up the power washer and blasts paint chips all over the place again. I talked to him about it last week but I expect him to do it again. Looks like he's going to make no attempt to clean up the chips.

481 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:26:27am

re: #480 Killgore Trout

I'm waiting to see if yuppy neighbor fires up the power washer and blasts paint chips all over the place again. I talked to him about it last week but I expect him to do it again. Looks like he's going to make no attempt to clean up the chips.

So he's letting the chips fall where they may!?!?!

(damn, that was a cheapie!)

482 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:31:02am

re: #481 sattv4u2

So he's letting the chips fall where they may!?!?!

(damn, that was a cheapie!)

Heh, I thought about urging him to clean them up. He has an 18 month old toddler. Kids and paint chips don't get along well. He either doesn't know or care, I'll leave it alone as long as he doesn't spray paint chips onto my vegetables again.

483 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:33:49am

re: #482 Killgore Trout

Heh, I thought about urging him to clean them up. He has an 18 month old toddler. Kids and paint chips don't get along well. He either doesn't know or care, I'll leave it alone as long as he doesn't spray paint chips onto my vegetables again.

Cover your veggies with a big sheet of plastic (or something)

You can get cheap drop cloths at the dollar store

If nothing else, it will keep you from having to pick hundreds of individual chips out of your veggie/ flower beds

484 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:34:17am

re: #482 Killgore Trout

Heh, I thought about urging him to clean them up. He has an 18 month old toddler. Kids and paint chips don't get along well. He either doesn't know or care, I'll leave it alone as long as he doesn't spray paint chips onto my vegetables again.

Maybe he's trying to fix that whole passing on his idiot genes thing....

485 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:35:32am

re: #479 sattv4u2

You should

iirc, Indy doesn't have a great record
A) outdoors
B) in December
C) in a northeast city

I'll be shocked if Manning isn't co-owner/GM of the colts shortly after he decides to retire.

486 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:36:23am

re: #483 sattv4u2

Cover your veggies with a big sheet of plastic (or something)

You can get cheap drop cloths at the dollar store

If nothing else, it will keep you from having to pick hundreds of individual chips out of your veggie/ flower beds

Yeah, I already have the row covers in place just in case but if he does it again I'll still have to go through and pick up the paint chips. I just don't want them contaminating the soil.

487 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:37:35am

re: #474 RogueOne

The ATF should be code for the best 3 day festival ever.

Crap. Now I've depressed myself just thinking about this. All of it. I'm relapsing into Teabagger mode here.

488 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:38:01am

re: #486 Killgore Trout

Yeah, I already have the row covers in place just in case but if he does it again I'll still have to go through and pick up the paint chips. I just don't want them contaminating the soil.

Thats why I suggested the covers/ tarps

Do you have a leaf blower? If not, borrow/rent one and once he's done just blow the chips over to his property

489 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:38:33am

re: #466 RogueOne

and now for something really important:

Peyton Manning 'willing to take less' money
[Link: eye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com...]

That man's a class act. Other players should take sportsmanship lessons from the Manning brothers.

490 RogueOne  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:39:50am

re: #487 Gus 802

Crap. Now I've depressed myself just thinking about this. All of it. I'm relapsing into Teabagger mode here.

I'm trying to entice you with evil libertarian promises of cheap drugs, alcohol, cigarettes and guns.

491 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:40:44am

re: #480 Killgore Trout

I'm waiting to see if Suppy neighbor fires up the power washer and blasts paint chips all over the place again. I talked to him about it last week but I expect him to do it again. Looks like he's going to make no attempt to clean up the chips.

Suppy:Stupid Urban Pusillanimous Polecat. It's my mother's turn of phrase.

BBL

492 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:43:03am

K Kiddies

UPSIDE,, the backyard grass is probably dry enough for me to mow it now

DOPWNSIDE,,, unlike 3+ hours ago when I was out there doing other yardwork, it's now about 95 with 70% humidity!!

oh ,, joy!!

493 sattv4u2  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:43:36am

re: #492 sattv4u2

K Kiddies

UPSIDE,, the backyard grass is probably dry enough for me to mow it now

DOPWNSIDE,,, unlike 3+ hours ago when I was out there doing other yardwork, it's now about 95 with 70% humidity!!

oh ,, joy!!

494 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:43:37am

re: #488 sattv4u2

Do you have a leaf blower? If not, borrow/rent one and once he's done just blow the chips over to his property

I have a huge shop vac that I used on the worst areas and just skimmed off the top inch or two of soil. I left the shop vac out in a very visible place hoping he'll get the hint and clean up the chips.

495 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:45:16am

Moarning folks. New page.

496 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:46:02am

re: #494 Killgore Trout

I have a huge shop vac that I used on the worst areas and just skimmed off the top inch or two of soil. I left the shop vac out in a very visible place hoping he'll get the hint and clean up the chips.

You want my advice? Stop being nice. Start yelling. You already tried being nice. Either that or go out there with a rake while he's running that thing and start flinging those paint chips back into his yard while playing AC/DC on your stereo at 11.

497 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:47:08am

re: #496 Gus 802

You want my advice? Stop being nice. Start yelling. You already tried being nice. Either that or go out there with a rake while he's running that thing and start flinging those paint chips back into his yard while playing AC/DC rap music on your stereo at 11.

Make that rap music.

498 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:51:26am

Speaking of money holes...

Iraq less safe than a year ago: US watchdog
Nearly a dozen civilians die violent deaths in Iraq every day

A top US adviser on Iraq has accused the US military of glossing over an upsurge in violence, just months before its troops are due to be withdrawn.

Iraq is more dangerous now than a year ago, said a report issued by the US Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, Stuart W Bowen Junior.

He said the killing of US soldiers and senior Iraqi figures, had risen, along with attacks in Baghdad .

The report contradicts usually upbeat assessments from the US military.

It comes as Washington is preparing to withdraw its remaining 47,000 troops from Iraq by the end of the year, despite fears that the Iraqi security forces might not be ready to take over fully....

499 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:53:13am

re: #496 Gus 802

You want my advice? Stop being nice. Start yelling. You already tried being nice. Either that or go out there with a rake while he's running that thing and start flinging those paint chips back into his yard while playing AC/DC on your stereo at 11.

Nah, I've been working on being a better person over the past couple years. I'll kill him with kindness. The more dickish he becomes the nicer I'll be. If nothing else it makes be a happier person.

500 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:55:03am

re: #499 Killgore Trout

Nah, I've been working on being a better person over the past couple years. I'll kill him with kindness. The more dickish he becomes the nicer I'll be. If nothing else it makes be a happier person.

OK. Whatever works for you.

501 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 8:56:35am

If he leaves more paint chips on his property in an area that I have to worry about rain run off and soil contamination I'll just go over after he leaves for work and clean them up again. I did it last week and it took a couple hours but it's better that waiting for him to do it.

502 The Left  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:01:19am

re: #487 Gus 802

Crap. Now I've depressed myself just thinking about this. All of it. I'm relapsing into Teabagger mode here.

Are you yelling at kids to get off your damn lawn yet? If you're not it's not too late. :-)

503 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:02:32am

re: #502 iceweasel

Are you yelling at kids to get off your damn lawn yet? If you're not it's not too late. :-)

Not yet but I'm tempted. Most of the kids are still asleep alongside their boozer parents in Hooterville.

//

504 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:05:44am

Burp...

Islamist militia 'shot Libya rebel Abdel Fattah Younes'

An Islamist militia was behind the killing of Libyan rebel commander Gen Abdel Fattah Younes, who was shot dead on Thursday, a rebel minister has said.

Ali Tarhouni said Gen Younes was killed by members of the Obaida Ibn Jarrah Brigade, a group linked to the rebels.

Gen Younes defected to the rebels in February after serving in the Libyan leadership since the 1969 coup which brought Col Muammar Gaddafi to power.

Meanwhile Nato says it bombed Libyan state TV transmitters overnight....

505 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:07:56am
506 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:08:43am

re: #502 iceweasel

Are you yelling at kids to get off your damn lawn yet? If you're not it's not too late. :-)

Heh. A little girl from down the street came by yesterday and started singing, spinning and flapping her arms. Her mother told me it's the yellow balloon dance (I have these yellow balloons around to scare the crows. As far as I can tell the lyrics were "Yellooowww Balloooon! The Yelloow Balloooon is here!" Very cute.

507 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:09:18am

re: #15 Sergey Romanov

There is an idiot commenter there, scroll down to "armaros":

[Link: hurryupharry.org...]

He quotes SB and Gus. What a moron.

We had one of those. I didn't try looking at his old comments. I'm sure there are no surprises. From his comment at Harry's:

He is an obsessed stalker with no life and no blog left except for his cult mignons who praise him daily for his intellectual farts.

Mmm, cult mignons. Could be the new 'honco".

508 The Left  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:09:48am

re: #506 Killgore Trout

Heh. A little girl from down the street came by yesterday and started singing, spinning and flapping her arms. Her mother told me it's the yellow balloon dance (I have these yellow balloons around to scare the crows. As far as I can tell the lyrics were "Yellooowww Ballooon! The Yelloow Ballooon is here!" Very cute.

That's too adorable!

509 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:11:17am

re: #507 wrenchwench

We had one of those. I didn't try looking at his old comments. I'm sure there are no surprises. From his comment at Harry's:

Mmm, cult mignons. Could be the new 'honco".

Oooo! Oooo! I missed that. Let me go look...

510 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:11:32am

re: #504 Gus 802

Ninja'd.

511 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:18:46am

Yeah. I get it. I know the way these butthurt mouth breathing anti-Jihadist bloggers think. They hope someday we have a dictatorship whereupon people like Charles, SB or me are unable to speak. Their vision is a right wing version of Hugo Chavez's Venezuela. Our reaction towards Geller could be seen as a "free market" reaction. She is in the public sphere not me. I am just a citizen responding to her lunacy as I am free to do in these United States. She can speak her lunacy and I can respond. If she doesn't expect criticism leveled against her than she can start her own dictatorship.

In the mean time. I'm reminded of something...

From Jeffrey Goldberg:

Pamela Geller's Followers Go Nuts (or Are Nuts, or Something)
By Jeffrey Goldberg

Jul 28 2011, 10:54 AM ET
Please, nutty people, leave my e-mail inbox alone! I've been flooded with mail from defenders of Pamela Geller, the shrieking bigot who thinks all Muslims are evil, that Muslims live under her bed, that Muslims short-sheeted her bed at summer camp, and so on. Here is one such letter:

Pamela Geller is right, you want to see America and Israel destroyed. Why do you love Muslims so much? Are you a secret Muslim?

You got me! I am a secret Muslim. Well, not a secret one anymore. I'm actually known in Occupied Palestine as Abu Tsuris. I was a summer intern with Hamas (in the press office) and I'm hoping to get my M.A. in Shari'a from al-Azhar University, where I also play for the lacrosse team.

Keep reading.

512 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:23:15am

[Link: www.reuters.com...]

Police said Breivik was interrogated for 10 hours on Friday, verifying details from previous questioning and answering new questions.

"He explains himself well and is more than willing to talk about the events," police attorney Paal-Fredrik Hjort Kraby told a news conference on Saturday.

513 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:23:43am

I just managed to walk around the entire Central Park Reservoir by mistake, instead of just walking by it on my way across the park.

I r smrt.

514 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:24:17am

It's no surprise that these anti-social mental deformities also admire Milosevic, Mladic, Pinochet and Putin. Heck, they even admire Breivik's rhetoric.

515 funky chicken  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:24:19am

Hey, I got an ad for a Koch Institute paid internship on the sidebar. Wow, an offer to help "increase liberty" or some nonsense. Hey, if creationists can sneak their way through doctorate programs in biological sciences, maybe some lizard could get on at the Koch lobbyist firm. I'm not sneaky enough though.

516 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:25:35am

re: #513 Obdicut

I just managed to walk around the entire Central Park Reservoir by mistake, instead of just walking by it on my way across the park.

I r smrt.

The road less traveled etc. etc.

517 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:27:05am

re: #501 Killgore Trout

If he leaves more paint chips on his property in an area that I have to worry about rain run off and soil contamination I'll just go over after he leaves for work and clean them up again. I did it last week and it took a couple hours but it's better that waiting for him to do it.

Before you get too inconvenienced, gather some chips and buy a lead test kit from a good hardware store. If the paint is fairly contemporary, it might not even have lead content.

518 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:27:46am

re: #517 Decatur Deb

I think he already did several days ago.

519 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:28:32am

re: #513 Obdicut

I just managed to walk around the entire Central Park Reservoir by mistake, instead of just walking by it on my way across the park.

I r smrt.

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.

520 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:30:12am

re: #515 funky chicken

Hey, I got an ad for a Koch Institute paid internship on the sidebar. Wow, an offer to help "increase liberty" or some nonsense. Hey, if creationists can sneak their way through doctorate programs in biological sciences, maybe some lizard could get on at the Koch lobbyist firm. I'm not sneaky enough though.

I'd have to wear pantyhose. No can do.

521 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:30:42am

re: #519 wrenchwench

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.

You mean 3 lefties have as much worth as 1 rightie? TRAITOR!

//

522 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:30:45am

This just in...

[Link: andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com...]

523 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:32:31am

Did Sully stop blogging at The Atlantic?

524 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:33:58am
525 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:34:47am

re: #523 Sergey Romanov

Did Sully stop blogging at The Atlantic?

Got me.

526 simoom  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:35:00am

I was reading this summary of the current incarnation of the BBA:

[Link: fredbauerblog.blogspot.com...]

The “balanced budget amendment” (BBA) currently endorsed by many Congressional Republicans not only requires that the budget be balanced but also stipulates, among other things, that federal spending cannot go above 18% of GDP without a 2/3 majority vote in favor, that taxes cannot be increased without a 2/3 majority vote in favor, and that a vote of 3/5 of both branches of Congress will be required to raise the debt ceiling. A 2/3 vote can also allow the budget not to be balanced. War can allow many of these majority requirements to be waived---with the notable exception of taxes, which would still require a 2/3 majority to be increased.

I think this makes clear why Boehner's modified bill, where a debt ceiling increase hinges on a BBA being passed by congress, contains basically the most effective poison pill that can almost be imagined. The current RW-edit of the BBA would enshrine in the constitution great pressure to balance the budget at historically low spending levels while at the same time giving GOP tax policy preferences a massive advantage (66% of congressmen required to raise revenues) no matter how democratic elections shake out in the future. It also makes any future blackmail attempts using debt ceiling increases even harder to diffuse (60% required in both Houses).

There's also something profoundly undemocratic about a party only controlling a majority of one body of congress (while their opposition controls the other and the White House) and attempting to "leverage" the well-being of the country into amending the constitution when they don't have anywhere near the 2/3-votes needed in either body of Congress.

527 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:35:02am

re: #517 Decatur Deb

Before you get too inconvenienced, gather some chips and buy a lead test kit from a good hardware store. If the paint is fairly contemporary, it might not even have lead content.

I tested for lead and they're negative. Still, even modern paint (I'd guess this stuff is about 20 years old) has xylene, acetone, and all kinds of nasty chemicals and carcinogens. Still not safe on vegetables or children. I'm sure all these yards have plenty of old paint chips and nasty chemicals in them all ready. I'm not terribly uptight about it but I do try to minimize soil contamination when I can.

528 funky chicken  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:36:06am

re: #511 Gus 802

Sekrit Muslim worried about Islamists in Tahrir Square. How confusing:

[Link: www.theatlantic.com...]

529 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:36:25am

re: #525 Gus 802

Got me.

[Link: nymag.com...]

530 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:36:33am

re: #526 simoom

Basically, it would turn the US into California's legislative system.

Awesome.

531 recusancy  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:37:34am

re: #530 Obdicut

Basically, it would turn the US into California's legislative system.

Awesome.

Exactly.

532 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:38:50am

re: #528 funky chicken

Sekrit Muslim worried about Islamists in Tahrir Square. How confusing:

[Link: www.theatlantic.com...]

Yeah. Same here. Which is why I mentioned them in my #504. Yep. That's me. The sekrit Islamist. Uh huh.

533 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:40:06am

re: #532 Gus 802

Yeah. Same here. Which is why I mentioned them in my #504. Yep. That's me. The sekrit Islamist. Uh huh.

Assalam aleikum, brother.

534 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:40:20am

re: #527 Killgore Trout

I tested for lead and they're negative. Still, even modern paint (I'd guess this stuff is about 20 years old) has xylene, acetone, and all kinds of nasty chemicals and carcinogens. Still not safe on vegetables or children. I'm sure all these yards have plenty of old paint chips and nasty chemicals in them all ready. I'm not terribly uptight about it but I do try to minimize soil contamination when I can.

Used to work in a related field--paints can have The Nasty, but xylene, acetone, and any other volatiles should be long gone. They did their bit of damage when they gassed off the wet paint. I'll bend to any current industrial hygiene guy on this.

535 funky chicken  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:41:16am

re: #527 Killgore Trout

Most of the toxic stuff in paint is volatile, so it would be gone by now. I agree that old paint waste isn't my chosen soil amendment, but don't worry too much about it.

536 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:41:24am

re: #533 Sergey Romanov

Assalam aleikum, brother.



Uh oh! I just
re-Tweeted this!

537 funky chicken  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:42:34am

re: #530 Obdicut

Basically, it would turn the US into California's legislative system.

Awesome.

And don't these guys spend an awful lot of time screaming about the destruction of CA by the legislature there?

538 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:43:26am

re: #534 Decatur Deb

Used to work in a related field--paints can have The Nasty, but xylene, acetone, and any other volatiles should be long gone. They did their bit of damage when they gassed off the wet paint. I'll bend to any current industrial hygiene guy on this.

I use chemicals like xylene (xylol), mineral spirits, acetone fairly frequently when working on cellos and violins. I use gloves and am pretty careful with them but I'm sure I already have more than my fair share of exposure.

539 Obdicut  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:43:41am

re: #537 funky chicken

And don't these guys spend an awful lot of time screaming about the destruction of CA by the legislature there?

And it's actually even worse, since it doesn't provide any protection against spending, just against raising the debt limit. They've managed to convince themselves that they're the same.

540 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:49:24am

Little Green Footballs has evolved into irrelevance!!11ty Charles Johnson's OPINION MEANS NOTHING!!11ty

LOL Yeah right.

541 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:49:35am

re: #538 Killgore Trout

I use chemicals like xylene (xylol), mineral spirits, acetone fairly frequently when working on cellos and violins. I use gloves and am pretty careful with them but I'm sure I already have more than my fair share of exposure.

Those you mention have fairly generous Threshold Limit Values--i.e. they are not proven to cause harm until you get a fairly good shot of them, mostly in your breathing air. A simple organic vapor half-mask respirator should cut the little you describe to a safe level. They have skin-drying characteristics, but nothing very chronic unless you get an unlikely bath in them. Prolonged high skin or esp. breathing exposures would be a central nervous system and liver risk. The MSDS is our friend, but only if you spend a lot of time learning the unique language and politics behind their development.

542 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:51:38am

re: #540 Gus 802

LOL Yeah right.

That's why we spend our spare time glued to LGF on our monitors.

543 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:52:21am

re: #536 Gus 802


Uh oh! I just
re-Tweeted this!

I feel a great disturbance in Jihad!

544 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:53:59am

re: #542 Sergey Romanov

...

And have two parody accounts of Gus_802 on Twitter!!11ty

Charles Johnson Gus_802 is irrelevant!!11ty

545 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:54:56am

I confess. Charles pays me 300 dollars a day to be here and comment.

//

546 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:55:11am

re: #540 Gus 802

LOL Yeah right.

Its so meaningless that they hang on its every word, just so they can say how insignificant.

547 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:55:54am

re: #545 Gus 802

I confess. Charles pays me 300 dollars a day to be here and comment.

//

Clearly at the low end of the Zionist Pay Scale.

548 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:56:37am

re: #546 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Its so meaningless that they hang on its every word, just so they can say how insignificant.

Why we're so insignificant they keep track of when we ridicule the insignificance of our alleged insignificance!

//

549 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:57:50am

re: #530 Obdicut

Basically, it would turn the US into California's legislative system.

Awesome.

I'm not really the expert on California law that I so often appear to be.

I'm going to guess it means at least one of a few things:

1) Extremely easy to pass law based on any crazy old whim - Louis Gohmert could pass his Time Travelling Terror Baby Containment Act by simply having a dream about it. Equally easy to repeal any existing law. Entire decades can be spent enacting, overturning, and re-enacting a traffic regulation if one is so inclined.

2) Damned near impossible to do anything at all. Declaring Congress to be in session for the day requires ratification by 4/5ths of the states, and the notarized signature of 94% of everyone over the age of 12 but under the age of 43 whose middle name is "Lee". Even harder to repeal laws.

3) either or both of the above in any combination, with the added requirement that all proceedings be conducted in Esperanto.

550 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:58:17am

They R insignificant! Now! About Killgore_Trout's latest post on kale and frogs. We must address this at once! To the boiler ROOM!!11ty

551 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:58:30am

re: #548 Gus 802

Why we're so insignificant they keep track of when we ridicule the insignificance of our alleged insignificance!

//

How can you argue with them? They have graphs.

552 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 9:59:14am

re: #551 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

How can you argue with them? They have graphs.

They do! LOL It's a science!

Anyone see my funny hat?

//

553 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:00:38am

re: #552 Gus 802

They do! LOL It's a science!

Anyone see my funny hat?

//

Is it pointy?

554 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:01:14am

re: #552 Gus 802

They do! LOL It's a science!

Anyone see my funny hat?

//

Image: science_serious_business-331x500.jpg

555 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:02:02am

re: #554 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

556 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:05:56am

re: #548 Gus 802

Why we're so insignificant they keep track of when we ridicule the insignificance of our alleged insignificance!

//

557 kirkspencer  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:07:30am

re: #530 Obdicut

Basically, it would turn the US into California's legislative system.

Awesome.

Worse.

18% of last year's GDP (not this year's, it has to use the preceding year) of ~14T would be ~2.5T. FY2011's expenditures are on track for ~3.8T.

So, whatcha gonna cut for that 1.3% difference?

558 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:07:54am

re: #556 Sergey Romanov

[Video]

Tried to link to a time inside the clip, if it doesn't work, ignore.

559 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:09:06am

re: #558 Sergey Romanov

Tried to link to a time inside the clip, if it doesn't work, ignore.

Was linking to 63:50.

560 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:09:43am

re: #557 kirkspencer

Worse.

18% of last year's GDP (not this year's, it has to use the preceding year) of ~14T would be ~2.5T. FY2011's expenditures are on track for ~3.8T.

So, whatcha gonna cut for that 1.3%T difference?

561 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:10:06am

re: #559 Sergey Romanov

Was linking to 63:50.

Thanks. I'm on a limited connection here with only 5G a month so I can't watch videos. Otherwise it would vanish in a week.

562 kirkspencer  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:10:59am

re: #557 kirkspencer

Worse.

18% of last year's GDP (not this year's, it has to use the preceding year) of ~14T would be ~2.5T. FY2011's expenditures are on track for ~3.8T.

So, whatcha gonna cut for that 1.3% difference?

ugh, forgot to explain the worst. That cut would cause a downturn in GDP, which would recurse for at least three years. It's basically a TABOR.

The best example of the problems of TABOR is what it did to Colorado over the past decade and a half.

563 kirkspencer  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:11:29am

re: #560 Decatur Deb

danke for the fix

564 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:16:56am

re: #243 NJDhockeyfan

Kitty cat named after the Führer...

There are people who are really into kitlers. (These people are not helping by only photographing her with one forelimb raised, btw.)

It is hardly the cat's fault it looks like Hitler--it's Hitler's fault for having a stupid distinctive mustache and hairdo. Just consider that the cat looks like Charlie Chaplin instead, and someone adopt her already.

And change the name!

565 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:18:10am

re: #541 Decatur Deb

Prolonged high skin or esp. breathing exposures would be a central nervous system and liver risk.


I heard the theory/old wives tale that the chemicals used in early oil paints is the reason why so many great painters were alcoholic. The alcohol counters the effects on the nervous system.

566 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:20:29am

re: #550 Gus 802

Heh. They put up a thread yesterday about my decision to delay home improvement spending because of the debt ceiling debate dragging down the stock market. When I skimmed the comments last night even the stalkers admitted they were postponing big spending too. Outrage fail.

567 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:21:18am

re: #347 Sergey Romanov

Not any Judaism. I think they would spare practitioners of non-rabbinical forms. Karaites and such.

In the case of the Karaites, I've been told, only because they believed they were not ethnic Jews--after consulting with the German rabbinate, who told them, "Oh, THEM? They're SO not ethnic Jews."

So I have been told, meaning I heard this once in a lecture, no references.

568 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:22:01am

re: #565 Killgore Trout

I heard the theory/old wives tale that the chemicals used in early oil paints is the reason why so many great painters were alcoholic. The alcohol counters the effects on the nervous system.

Or being overly fond of Old Master could make you try to be an old master.

569 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:22:53am

Speaking of frogs: It looks like most of the tads have grown legs and left the pond. There's a few late bloomers left but not many. I also noticed that some of the plants closest to the pond were getting overrun by aphids last week but now are completely bug free.

570 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:23:43am

re: #424 sattv4u2

And then she mentioned that all the marble in the Vatican came from the Colosseum.
recycling program

Cracked.com informs us that the facing on the Pyramids was stripped during the Middle Ages,and used for building in Cairo.

571 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:23:49am

re: #567 SanFranciscoZionist

In the case of the Karaites, I've been told, only because they believed they were not ethnic Jews--after consulting with the German rabbinate, who told them, "Oh, THEM? They're SO not ethnic Jews."

So I have been told, meaning I heard this once in a lecture, no references.

That goes without saying. Ethnic Jews would be murdered regardless of religion.

572 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:24:07am

re: #566 Killgore Trout

Heh. They put up a thread yesterday about my decision to delay home improvement spending because of the debt ceiling debate dragging down the stock market. When I skimmed the comments last night even the stalkers admitted they were postponing big spending too. Outrage fail.

That sure takes a lot of commitment. I mean to create a thread about you based on your comment on delaying home improvements. They do this all the time though and it sure is sad pathetic. But you know what they're trying to say is "see KT is poor!" while "we're rich!". LOL Yeah, right.

573 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:26:07am

Kid stuff--BBL.

574 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:26:33am

re: #540 Gus 802

Little Green Footballs has evolved into irrelevance!!11ty Charles Johnson's OPINION MEANS NOTHING!!11ty

LOL Yeah right.

Image: dec05882-12e0-49fd-a2f3-6fcf381fd394.jpg

575 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:28:05am

re: #574 wrenchwench

Image: dec05882-12e0-49fd-a2f3-6fcf381fd394.jpg

LOL! Oh boy that's funny.

576 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:28:29am

re: #564 SanFranciscoZionist

There are people who are really into kitlers. (These people are not helping by only photographing her with one forelimb raised, btw.)

It is hardly the cat's fault it looks like Hitler--it's Hitler's fault for having a stupid distinctive mustache and hairdo. Just consider that the cat looks like Charlie Chaplin instead, and someone adopt her already.

And change the name!

You are now manually trying to translate this speech into lolcat.

577 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:30:13am

My ass hurts.

1 hour later...

BREAKING NEWS!!11ty GUS_802's ASS HURTS!!11ty

Hurdy hurr hurr a derpity derpy dooo!!11ty

DERP

578 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:31:55am

re: #569 Killgore Trout

Speaking of frogs: It looks like most of the tads have grown legs and left the pond. There's a few late bloomers left but not many. I also noticed that some of the plants closest to the pond were getting overrun by aphids last week but now are completely bug free.

Frogs go in, aphids go out. You can't explain that.

579 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:32:16am

My elderly, sharp-as-a-whip, and very, very leftist great-aunt has forwarded me one of those '28th Amendment, make Congress use the same health care as the rest of America' e-mails.

As God is my witness, I don't know what to do.

580 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:32:30am

OT, but we now know why General Younis was killed a few days ago:

Finance Minister Ali Tarhouni, a prominent member of the NTC, said the suspect arrested in connection with the Younis assassination was a rebel militia leader whom the NTC had dispatched to arrest Younis and bring him back to Benghazi. Tarhouni said that the militia commander, whose name was not made public, claimed he was unable to stop his subordinates from shooting Younis and two of his aides instead of escorting them back to Benghazi as ordered. This account generally conformed to the claims of an eyewitness who made separate allegations earlier in the day, before Tarhouni spoke, blaming the attacks on members of the February 17th Martyrs' Brigade who allegedly claimed that Younis had their father killed several years earlier.

Unrelated revenge. Also, I think I heard somewhere is that this Martyr's Brigade is the Islamist portion of the rebels.

This could badly damage the Islamists in Libya.

581 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:34:03am

re: #580 ProLifeLiberal

pls to see my #510

582 Decatur Deb  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:34:48am

re: #579 SanFranciscoZionist

My elderly, sharp-as-a-whip, and very, very leftist great-aunt has forwarded me one of those '28th Amendment, make Congress use the same health care as the rest of America' e-mails.

As God is my witness, I don't know what to do.

Single-payer punchline to follow---

583 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:35:41am

re: #579 SanFranciscoZionist

My elderly, sharp-as-a-whip, and very, very leftist great-aunt has forwarded me one of those '28th Amendment, make Congress use the same health care as the rest of America' e-mails.

As God is my witness, I don't know what to do.

Send her to snopes?

584 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:35:46am

Crazy Pam: Clarifying the Edit

Back in June 2007 I received an email from a disheartened reader in Norway who was bereft at the deterioration of the society and the lawlessness of life in Norway. It was a heartbreaking email, and I published it at the time: "Email from Norway."

After the massacre in Norway last week, I removed the following sentence from the email, as I found it insenstive and inappropriate: "We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast."

The sentence I edited is not an incitement to anything. It refers to self-defense, but I removed it in the light of recent horrific events in Norway. I thought it insensitive. Nothing more.

Everyone has a right to self-defense.

The idea that I am scrubbing my archives, or "evidence" as many liars are suggesting, is a blatant lie. I have changed nothing else. But that is irrelevant; destroying the counter jihad movement is paramount at this moment. Even more farfetched is the lie the lefties (and even the freepers) are advancing: that the email was written by Breivik. Insanity, folks.

Breivik did not write the letter. Many Norwegians see their country imploding. The email was not written by Breivik, and contrary to popular leftist belief, not every Norwegian is Anders Breivik.

The smear merchants and destroyers trying to tie me to Breivik are engaging in another fallacious attack on those of us who are fighting against supremacism, violence and evil.

This is orwellian propaganda.

585 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:36:17am

re: #581 laZardo

I was asleep then. :P

After this, there will be a page today. However, it will only cover incidents and changes.

Zliten has not seen a change in a while.

The Islamists just shot themselves with a Rocket Launcher.

586 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:37:40am

re: #584 Killgore Trout

Crazy Pam: Clarifying the Edit

Back in June 2007 I received an email from a disheartened reader in Norway who was bereft at the deterioration of the society and the lawlessness of life in Norway. It was a heartbreaking email, and I published it at the time: "Email from Norway."

After the massacre in Norway last week, I removed the following sentence from the email, as I found it insenstive and inappropriate: "We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast."

The sentence I edited is not an incitement to anything. It refers to self-defense, but I removed it in the light of recent horrific events in Norway. I thought it insensitive. Nothing more.

Everyone has a right to self-defense.

The idea that I am scrubbing my archives, or "evidence" as many liars are suggesting, is a blatant lie. I have changed nothing else. But that is irrelevant; destroying the counter jihad movement is paramount at this moment. Even more farfetched is the lie the lefties (and even the freepers) are advancing: that the email was written by Breivik. Insanity, folks.

Breivik did not write the letter. Many Norwegians see their country imploding. The email was not written by Breivik, and contrary to popular leftist belief, not every Norwegian is Anders Breivik.

The smear merchants and destroyers trying to tie me to Breivik are engaging in another fallacious attack on those of us who are fighting against supremacism, violence and evil.

This is orwellian propaganda.

Fixed.

587 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:37:57am
Breivik did not write the letter. Many Norwegians see their country imploding. The email was not written by Breivik, and contrary to popular leftist belief, not every Norwegian is Anders Breivik.


Even more reason to give the information to the authorities. This person is paranoid, hateful and possibly heavily armed. The police need to investigate.

588 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:38:37am

re: #584 Killgore Trout

The Whore of Babylon won't escape this one. LGF (among others) won't let her. Her explanation is transparently false.

Considering the events of the last week, I am pissed as hell at her.

589 prairiefire  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:39:17am

re: #579 SanFranciscoZionist

Does it strike you as somewhat childish statement? Or an angry one?

590 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:39:22am

re: #584 Killgore Trout

re: #586 Gus 802

Hmpf. She ought to know about smear merchants of orwellian propaganda.

591 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:40:34am

re: #587 Killgore Trout

To Pam:

Actually, you little movement wasn't that popular in Norway, and was heavily shunned. Most people didn't see an issue. The Norwegians thought you were ignorant bigots.

They now see you as a bunch of genocidal fascists. This is a great improvement. For my side.

592 jaunte  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:41:58am

re: #584 Killgore Trout

"I thought it insensitive. Nothing more."


'Making the truth less unpleasant' is one definition of Orwellian doublespeak.

593 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:42:26am

re: #589 prairiefire

Does it strike you as somewhat childish statement? Or an angry one?

It's just a forwarded piece, and it's not as crazy-sounding as some of the ones in that genre--my MIL forwards the crazy ones, where Congress has special laws that they can't be prosecuted for sexual harassment, yadada.

If you're thinking Tante may be entering some form of dementia--I don't know, that's possible. Seems IMpossible, but she's an old lady...

594 prairiefire  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:44:41am

re: #593 SanFranciscoZionist

I was just thinking that my very leftist mom has occasionally expressed more of a schoolyard "that'll teach 'em" reaction to the right. She can get quite emotional about it, as can I.

595 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:44:44am

re: #585 ProLifeLiberal

I was asleep then. :P

After this, there will be a page today. However, it will only cover incidents and changes.

Zliten has not seen a change in a while.

The Islamists just shot themselves with a Rocket Launcher.

Nah, I think they're finally breaking out. Also my #510 links to a fresh page, should be on the Recent pages list.

596 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:44:47am

re: #528 funky chicken

Sekrit Muslim worried about Islamists in Tahrir Square. How confusing:

[Link: www.theatlantic.com...]

It's actually very simple: Anyone who criticizes the "counter-Jihad" crowd must by definition be "pro-Jihad". Anything else would mean the CJs are wrong about something and their egos will not allow that possibility.

597 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:47:33am

re: #584 Killgore Trout

Crazy Pam: Clarifying the Edit

"Self defense" is what that Geller follower john jay is claiming his anti-Muslim blog has been about all along.

an index of posts on self defense .... & original sources (at the posts) ....

friends:

o.k., the secret is out. this is what this blog has always been about. this and only this.

my efforts have been to establish a coherent theory in support of the individual's right to exercise self defense against the aggressions and attacks of islam, and the jihad. this theory has been premised upon the philosophy serving as the bedrock of our organic documents, and upon the thoughts of antiquity, the very bedrock of our civilization.

598 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:49:36am
599 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:50:02am

Joseph Farah (one source of inspiration for Breivik on Biblical self-defense) in the same article called for his readers to stockpile weapons.

600 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:50:30am

re: #595 laZardo

But you are coming from the stance that intervention is always wrong. This is an extreme position. In addition, considering the state of things in Libya right now, these Islamists will be seen as being a help to Qaddafi. Very bad thing for them.

Look at how Bosnia and Kosovo turned out. Not great, but they still exist.

Also, your position aids and abets genocide. Many times, the weaker side will not be able to fight back, and will end up dead.

601 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:51:04am

re: #596 Dark_Falcon

It's actually very simple: Anyone who criticizes the "counter-Jihad" crowd must by definition be "pro-Jihad". Anything else would mean the CJs are wrong about something and their egos will not allow that possibility.

Simple conclusions for simple minds.

602 albusteve  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:51:48am

all these weeks and not even one reasonable, honest plan for spending has come out of DC...not one that impresses me anyway...our community is disorganized to say the least...fake pols, fake plans, fake deadlines, fake crisis....it's all pretty discouraging but on the bright side, the political theater is first rate....BO can't sleep, Boehner stuck his neck out, Pelosi can't save the planet, Cantor is drooling in the shadows...on and on....heros and martyrs and evil people are being bought and sold....the Grand Game

603 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:51:57am

re: #596 Dark_Falcon

It's actually very simple: Anyone who criticizes the "counter-Jihad" crowd must by definition be "pro-Jihad". Anything else would mean the CJs are wrong about something and their egos will not allow that possibility.

We should find a new name for them. "Anti-Jihad" lends them legitimacy. I'm anti-Jihad. And I think Pam's antics make it likelier for Islamic radicals to succeed.

604 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:52:17am

Binary minds are so much fun to deal with.
/

605 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:54:21am

All the so-called "counter-Jihad" movement (which it isn't) does is cry "Wolf!".

606 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:54:32am

re: #603 Sergey Romanov

We should find a new name for them. "Anti-Jihad" lends them legitimacy. I'm anti-Jihad. And I think Pam's antics make it likelier for Islamic radicals to succeed.

That's one of the goals of the Jihadists. They want more Pam Gellers. They want more Spencers. They want more Breiviks. These people are virtually playing into the Islamists hand. They want to foster hatred of Muslims in the USA as we've seen with the anti-Mosque movements. The anti-Islamic movements in America bolster their arguments with Muslim Americans. And so on.

607 Digital Display  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:54:52am

re: #602 albusteve

608 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:55:05am

re: #598 Gus 802

43 Senators Sign Letter Opposing The Reid Bill

Reid's dramatic killing the GOP's bill leads to the McConnell blockading Reid's bill. That's fairly normal partisan tit-for-tat.

609 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:55:48am

re: #603 Sergey Romanov

We should find a new name for them. "Anti-Jihad" lends them legitimacy. I'm anti-Jihad. And I think Pam's antics make it likelier for Islamic radicals to succeed.

How about "Anti-Islam Paranoids"?

610 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:56:42am

re: #600 ProLifeLiberal

But you are coming from the stance that intervention is always wrong. This is an extreme position. In addition, considering the state of things in Libya right now, these Islamists will be seen as being a help to Qaddafi. Very bad thing for them.

Look at how Bosnia and Kosovo turned out. Not great, but they still exist.

Also, your position aids and abets genocide. Many times, the weaker side will not be able to fight back, and will end up dead.

The Balkans ≠ MENA.

And often times the "weaker side" cannot fight back because we happen to actively sponsor the governments that keep them down e.g. Egypt. Our track record of the past since, well, 1953(!) has us sponsoring douchebags against douchebags in that region and breeding resentment in return. You'd think that we'd learned what that does after 60 years. (The only real exception, of course, is Israel.)

Maybe, what if, we could try NOT doing that?

611 albusteve  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:56:52am

re: #607 HoosierHoops

[Video]

I care about results...all the rest is bullshit and I see no reason to get all shook up about any of it

612 simoom  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:57:29am

Is anyone watching the house floor debate? They're going to vote on some proxy for the Reid bill (even though it's still being constantly modified in the Senate to woo more Republicans), under a special house rule where it would only pass with 2/3rd of the House voting for it (a standard under which even Boehner's-tea-party-sweetened bill wouldn't have passed).

Here's the cspan live feed:
[Link: www.c-span.org...]

The House will consider it under a special rule where a 2/3 majority is required for passage
613 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:58:40am

re: #612 simoom

Is anyone watching the house floor debate? They're going to vote on some proxy for the Reid bill (even though it's still being constantly modified in the Senate to woo more Republicans), under a special house rule where it would only pass with 2/3rd of the House voting for it (a standard under which even Boehner's-tea-party-sweetened bill wouldn't have passed).

Here's the cspan live feed:
[Link: www.c-span.org...]

It's designed to flip Reid the bird.

614 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 10:59:03am

re: #608 Dark_Falcon

Reid's dramatic killing the GOP's bill leads to the McConnell blockading Reid's bill. That's fairly normal partisan tit-for-tat.

True. We'll see how this plays out. But they better hurry up. Reid only needs to add 3 or more votes to his bill. He may have to amend his bill in order to get those votes. Scott Brown as you might have noticed did not sign that letter.

615 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:01:41am

re: #610 laZardo

Issue with your theory:

Libya wasn't one of these nations we were propping up. Remember the 80's?

In some cases, attack is a valid option.

And the Balkans may have different Ethnic Groups, but many of the issues there are also in the Middle East.

616 simoom  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:02:01am

re: #613 Dark_Falcon

It's designed to flip Reid the bird.

Sure, but I wonder if it actually means anything. Can you vote down a proxy bill that is different from whatever the final Senate product looks like, and have it apply to that final product when and if it passes the Senate? It seems if you could it would allow all sorts of interesting shenanigans.

617 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:02:50am

re: #614 Gus 802

True. We'll see how this plays out. But they better hurry up. Reid only needs to add 3 or more votes to his bill. He may have to amend his bill in order to get those votes. Scott Brown as you might have noticed did not sign that letter.

It would need major changes to get people to drop away from a signed statement of opposition. And those up for reelection cannot support any Democratic bill right now or they'll get a vigorous primary challenge from the Tea Party.

618 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:03:21am

Keep wasting time on meaningless bullshit. Thats the way to make sure shit gets done.

619 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:03:45am

re: #615 ProLifeLiberal

Issue with your theory:

Libya wasn't one of these nations we were propping up. Remember the 80's?

How can I put it this way...we were propping up Saddam because he happened to be less of a douchebag than Khomeini. When Gaddafi gave up his WMDs, well, we treated him as such vis-a-vis Kim Jong-Il and, surprise, Saddam.

620 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:04:58am

re: #617 Dark_Falcon

It would need major changes to get people to drop away from a signed statement of opposition. And those up for reelection cannot support any Democratic bill right now or they'll get a vigorous primary challenge from the Tea Party.

Well. They can either vote with minor changes on Reid's bill or be the cause of putting the USA in default. Seems like they have a choice here.

621 simoom  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:06:27am

re: #617 Dark_Falcon

And those up for reelection cannot support any Democratic bill right now or they'll get a vigorous primary challenge from the Tea Party.

I really hope that isn't the case, though I suppose it would clearly illustrate the folly of tying hyper-partisan, core party policy debates (on an unprecedented, epic, multi-trillion dollar scale) to must-pass-for-the-sake-of-the-country legislation

622 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:07:03am

re: #619 laZardo

True.

But how much did we give Libya? Next to nothing.

Your knee-jerk opposition to any sort of anti-genocide intervention is getting grating.

For heaven's sake, Sweden decided to attack!! We are on the right track if they do that.

623 Renaissance_Man  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:07:57am

re: #620 Gus 802

Well. They can either vote with minor changes on Reid's bill or be the cause of putting the USA in default. Seems like they have a choice here.

Yes, it comes down to which is worse: precipitating the decline of the United States of America, the greatest nation of the last 200 years, or compromising with people you think are liberals. Unfortunately, I can guess which choice the cult hates more.

624 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:08:28am

re: #609 Dark_Falcon

How about "Anti-Islam Paranoids"?

Anti-Islam or Anti-Muslim CTs?

625 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:10:13am

re: #623 Renaissance_Man

Yes, it comes down to which is worse: precipitating the decline of the United States of America, the greatest nation of the last 200 years, or compromising with people you think are liberals. Unfortunately, I can guess which choice the cult hates more.

There you go. Right now one could think what's worse? Going with Reid's bill or defaulting? I think the latter would be far worse even for the most devout conservative. Of course we're not dealing with conservatives in the traditional sense of the word anymore. Instead we're looking at a highly radicalized TPGOP.

626 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:10:58am

re: #624 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Anti-Muslim works better. It's anti-individual v. anti-ideology (any religion is ideology which can be opposed) and so is better.

627 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:12:16am

re: #622 ProLifeLiberal

True.

But how much did we give Libya? Next to nothing.

Your knee-jerk opposition to any sort of anti-genocide intervention is getting grating.

For heaven's sake, Sweden decided to attack!! We are on the right track if they do that.

Sweden wouldn't take part in it if they knew they weren't getting something out of it. Like a source of oil that wasn't from Russia, which I mentioned likes to use it as leverage.

I could concede that if the rationale is that an unstable state next to NATO would have threatening implications for future security, then it would be best to stabilize it. If Syria did move into the Turkish refugee camps, then Turkey has the right to defend itself. But regime change?

Haven't we proved over the last 60 years that it doesn't exactly work the way we want it to?

628 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:12:35am

re: #620 Gus 802

Well. They can either vote with minor changes on Reid's bill or be the cause of putting the USA in default. Seems like they have a choice here.

Then they'll accept the default. They can't throw down with the Tea Party right now, as they'd just lose.

629 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:12:54am

re: #624 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Anti-Islam or Anti-Muslim CTs?

'CT'?

630 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:13:39am

Guys--

I have a bunch of small files to e-mail to someone. What's the best method for doing this?

631 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:14:06am

re: #630 SanFranciscoZionist

Winrar?

632 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:14:22am

re: #630 SanFranciscoZionist

Guys--

I have a bunch of small files to e-mail to someone. What's the best method for doing this?

Use you computer.
/

633 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:14:31am

re: #630 SanFranciscoZionist

Guys--

I have a bunch of small files to e-mail to someone. What's the best method for doing this?

Zip and put on a site like sendspace.com, then send them the link.

634 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:14:36am

re: #630 SanFranciscoZionist

Guys--

I have a bunch of small files to e-mail to someone. What's the best method for doing this?

When a problem comes along...

635 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:14:49am

re: #629 Dark_Falcon

'CT'?

Conspiracy theorists

636 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:15:07am

re: #630 SanFranciscoZionist

Guys--

I have a bunch of small files to e-mail to someone. What's the best method for doing this?

What seems to be the problem, officer? /

637 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:15:23am

re: #635 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Conspiracy theorists

OK.

638 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:15:52am

EDITING THE CLARIFIER

Back in June 2007 I received an email from a disheartened psycho reader in Norway who was bereft at delusional about the deterioration of the society and the lawlessness of life in Norway. It was a heartbreaking threatening email, and I published it at the time: "Email from Norway."

After the massacre in Norway last week, I removed the following sentence from the email, as I found it insenstive and inappropriate incriminating and inciting: "We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast."

The sentence I edited is not an incitement to anything. It refers to a paranoid's need for self-defense, but I removed it in the light of recent horrific events in Norway. I thought it insensitive would get me in trouble. Nothing more.

Everyone has a right to threaten others in self-defense.

...etc.

639 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:16:57am

@Petabites Petabites
19% of children in #Boehner district in poverty: [Link: halfinten.org...] via @BlueDuPage

640 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:17:29am

OK--now, HOW do I zip it?

And if you tell me 'zip it good', I will cry.

641 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:18:21am

re: #639 Gus 802

@Petabites Petabites
19% of children in #Boehner district in poverty: [Link: halfinten.org...] via @BlueDuPage

Means nothing, proves nothing.

642 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:18:44am

I have no trouble with "anti-Jihad", I am not in favor of anyone imposing their religion on others by force. But to these people all Muslims are jihadists or jihad supporters.

643 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:19:16am

re: #640 SanFranciscoZionist

OK--now, HOW do I zip it?

And if you tell me 'zip it good', I will cry.

In an Explorer window...

File > New > Compressed (zipped) folder

And then treat it like any other folder.

644 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:19:19am

re: #640 SanFranciscoZionist

OK--now, HOW do I zip it?

And if you tell me 'zip it good', I will cry.

I suppose you use windows? I don't remember if it has built-in zip capabilities. You can google for WinZip, WinRar or 7z which are shareware programs. Download, install, run, ask if necessary.

645 Kragar  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:19:33am

re: #630 SanFranciscoZionist

Guys--

I have a bunch of small files to e-mail to someone. What's the best method for doing this?

Zip them into a single archive, send that file

646 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:19:39am

re: #643 laZardo

In an Explorer window...

File > New > Compressed (zipped) folder

And then treat it like any other folder.

Thanks.

647 AK-47%  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:19:41am

re: #641 Dark_Falcon

Means nothing, proves nothing.

They probably all have refrigerators and microwaves...

/

648 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:20:11am

re: #643 laZardo

In an Explorer window...

File > New > Compressed (zipped) folder

And then treat it like any other folder.

Ah, that must be it. As Lazardo says.

649 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:20:34am

re: #641 Dark_Falcon

Means nothing, proves nothing.

Yeah. You're right. They probably have air conditioning.

//

650 Killgore Trout  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:20:48am
651 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:21:08am

re: #647 ralphieboy

They probably all have refrigerators and microwaves...

/

LOL See #649. Typed that before I saw yours.

652 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:21:13am

I myself use only WinRar, so I have no idea if Windows has this feature or not ;)

653 wrenchwench  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:21:19am

re: #641 Dark_Falcon

Means nothing, proves nothing.

It may not prove anything, but it certainly means something.

Have a heart.

654 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:21:50am

re: #647 ralphieboy

They probably all have refrigerators and microwaves...

/

Actually, the great majority of them probably do.

655 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:22:19am

re: #628 Dark_Falcon

Then they'll accept the default. They can't throw down with the Tea Party right now, as they'd just lose.

...

WE HAVE NOT CHOICE BUT TO DEFAULT NOW BECAUSE TEH DEMOCRATES MADE ME DO IT!!11ty

TEA PARTY!!11ty

656 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:22:47am

re: #627 laZardo

Sweden is right next to the Oil Producer Norway. So there goes that idea.

657 goddamnedfrank  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:24:19am

re: #641 Dark_Falcon

Means nothing, proves nothing.

It means that damn near 1 in 5 children living in his district live in poverty while he fights to lower taxes on the wealthiest few Americans. It proves that both his and your priorities are complete and utter garbage.

658 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:27:00am

re: #657 goddamnedfrank

It means that damn near 1 in 5 children living in his district live in poverty while he fights to lower taxes on the wealthiest few Americans. It proves that both his and your priorities are complete and utter garbage.

...

YEAH BUT TEH BUSH TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH MAKE JOBS!!11ty

For BMW, De Beers, Rolls Royce, Grumman, Rolex...

659 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:28:32am

I saw this pic in an ad here:

[Link: googleads.g.doubleclick.net...]

Is this a pie? Or some monster pizza?

660 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:30:01am

re: #659 Sergey Romanov

I saw this pic in an ad here:

[Link: googleads.g.doubleclick.net...]

Is this a pie? Or some monster pizza?

Looks like a Pizza Cake™.

//

661 albusteve  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:30:09am

re: #659 Sergey Romanov

I saw this pic in an ad here:

[Link: googleads.g.doubleclick.net...]

Is this a pie? Or some monster pizza?

quiche?....looks yummy

662 engineer cat  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:31:25am

if higher taxes and more social services lead to economic decline, how come millionaires buy all their cars from germany, the uk, and italy - where unemployment has been lower than over here for the past few years - and we borrow most of the money to fund wars and run our government from communist china?

can some defender of the republican party answer this for me please?

663 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:31:53am

re: #660 Gus 802

Looks like a Pizza Cake™.

//

Let'em eat it. *shrugs* /

664 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:32:07am

re: #661 albusteve

quiche?...looks yummy

You bet it does!

665 blueraven  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:32:36am

re: #608 Dark_Falcon

Reid's dramatic killing the GOP's bill leads to the McConnell blockading Reid's bill. That's fairly normal partisan tit-for-tat.

The Boehner bill, with its BBA, was ridiculous and I think you know it. McConnell refuses to even negotiate with Reid. People should really stop with the false equivalency.

There is a plan by the dems, with no increased revenue, spending cuts that the republicans demand and still they wont take this as a victory and stop putting the entire economy in peril.

They have ulterior motives; to try to harm the president as much as possible. Torpedoes be damned, full speed ahead.

666 blueraven  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:34:07am

re: #613 Dark_Falcon

It's designed to flip Reid the bird.

It is petty and dangerous political posturing.

667 Gus  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:34:37am

re: #665 blueraven

The Boehner bill, with its BBA, was ridiculous and I think you know it. McConnell refuses to even negotiate with Reid. People should really stop with the false equivalency.

There is a plan by the dems, with no increased revenue, spending cuts that the republicans demand and still they wont take this as a victory and stop putting the entire economy in peril.

They have ulterior motives; to try to harm the president as much as possible. Torpedoes be damned, full speed ahead.

"I want Obama to fail." Rush Limbaugh (and the rest of the right wing)

668 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:34:38am

re: #656 ProLifeLiberal

Sweden is right next to the Oil Producer Norway. So there goes that idea.

Then perhaps they were obligated to as "members" of NATO. I hardly see how Libya would affect Sweden personally as compared to their obligations to a regional organization. The Mediterranean countries, more likely.

669 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 11:56:17am

re: #668 laZardo

Sweden isn't part of NATO.

670 laZardo  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:00:45pm

re: #669 ProLifeLiberal

...then why the hell are they interested in Libya, and how does it directly affect them?

671 Dark_Falcon  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:07:18pm

re: #670 laZardo

...then why the hell are they interested in Libya, and how does it directly affect them?

Because they can get oil from Libya. They'd rather get oil from there than from Russia, since Russia often uses its status as an energy supplier for leverage.

672 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:24:45pm

re: #166 Obdicut

What would you accept as evidence that the Nazis were not exterminationist from the beginning?

Some kind of Nazi proposition that a) let Jews off the hook and b) ensured that this was not just temporarily, most likely by another Nazi proposition that would guarantee that they respected the sovereignty of other nation states.

And what is your proof that they were?

This is rather complex, but the gist of my argument is that the Nazis defined themselves as essentially anti-jewish (not anti-slav, although a lot of Nazis were extremely eager to define Slavs as subhumans and draw the conclusions thereof). Coupled with their equally essential Lebensraum agenda, this leads no other conclusion.

673 ProGunLiberal  Sat, Jul 30, 2011 12:55:14pm

re: #671 Dark_Falcon

Again though Sweden is right next to Norway, a massive Oil Producer. So it's not that either.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 days ago
Views: 152 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1