Jump to bottom

398 comments
1 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:32:38am

Dear Teabaggers,

Cutting spending without increasing revenue doesn’t accomplish anything. It’s not enough to just spend less. We have to bring more money in if we’re ever going to have any hope of paying what we owe.

Idiots.

No love,
Me

2 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:34:52am

re: #1 Lidane

Dear Teabaggers,

Right now, interest rates on government bonds are so low that it’s actually cheaper for the government to borrow money for current expenditures than it is to rely on future tax revenue for it. Why do you guys consider debt that’s got 2% interest as being identical to debt at 20% interest?

Why don’t you guys understand things like the velocity of money?

How do you think our society is going to survive the ever-burgeoning wealth divide between the rich and everyone else?

3 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:36:52am

That’s it. I’m starting a company. It helps Americans emigrate to other countries by matching them up with overseas job opportunities. Brain Drain Incorporated. Congratulations, Republicans, you got your wish: with the rest of us gone, now the country can be as stupid as you want it to be.

4 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:37:41am

re: #2 Obdicut

Dear Teabaggers,

Right now, interest rates on government bonds are so low that it’s actually cheaper for the government to borrow money for current expenditures than it is to rely on future tax revenue for it. Why do you guys consider debt that’s got 2% interest as being identical to debt at 20% interest?

Why don’t you guys understand things like the velocity of money?

How do you think our society is going to survive the ever-burgeoning wealth divide between the rich and everyone else?

If they had any of that capitalist business sense that they claim, they’d know that. It’s like, basic corporate finance 101.

5 makeitstop  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:38:18am

All the years we spent worrying about destruction of democracy by external enemies, and here we are about to be kneecapped as a nation by crazies that call themselves American.

We beat the biggest and the baddest, but we’re on the verge of being brought low by a cabal of madmen who are supposedly our own countrymen.

So much for being the sunny optimist. I’m moving my tent over into the ‘we’re fucked’ section.

6 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:39:19am

re: #5 makeitstop

And, to add insult to injury, it’s by a crowd of rubes chanting “We’re saving America!”

7 webevintage  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:39:39am

Dear Democrats…get your shit together and fuck the Tea Party.
Personally I can’t accept cuts with no revenue increases.

8 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:40:04am

Orwell would be so proud.

“Increasing revenue” and “balanced approach” have become catchphrases because “raising taxes” doesn’t seem to resonate with Americans.

9 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:40:28am

re: #2 Obdicut

How do you think our society is going to survive the ever-burgeoning wealth divide between the rich and everyone else?

They don’t give a damn. They got theirs. Who cares about anyone else?

10 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:42:02am

re: #7 webevintage

Dear Democrats…get your shit together and fuck the Tea Party.
Personally I can’t accept cuts with no revenue increases.

We NEED a revenue increase. It’s insane that the only solution the Republicans offer is to cut spending, but if you try to suggest ways of bringing more money in to start paying down what we owe, they act like you’re wanting to publicly rape them or something.

11 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:42:50am

re: #8 FQ Kafir

Orwell would be so proud.

“Increasing revenue” and “balanced approach” have become catchphrases because “raising taxes” doesn’t seem to resonate with Americans.

What on earth does that have to do with Orwell?

Raising taxes increases revenue. Having them included would be part of a balanced approach.

Orwellian language is language that describes something in a way so as to reverse its true nature. Can you please explain how those phrases do that?

And you know Orwell was a socialist, right?

12 mr.fusion  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:44:01am

re: #10 Lidane

We NEED a revenue increase. It’s insane that the only solution the Republicans offer is to cut spending, but if you try to suggest ways of bringing more money in to start paying down what we owe, they act like you’re wanting to publicly rape them or something.

And it doesn’t even have to be all taxes. Why aren’t we talking about online gambling? Ending the war on drugs? Revamping the Justice System?

13 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:44:28am

re: #8 FQ Kafir

Orwell would be so proud.

Of the Tea Party and Republicans, yes. They’ve successfully convinced millions of people that they are somehow the party of fiscal responsibility.

14 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:44:42am

Dear Canada:

What do you think?

15 emcesq  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:44:48am

Centroid is being determined by the extremes, even as we weep.

16 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:45:14am

re: #11 Obdicut

What on earth does that have to do with Orwell?

[Link: orwell.ru…]

17 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:45:24am

re: #12 mr.fusion

And it doesn’t even have to be all taxes. Why aren’t we talking about online gambling? Ending the war on drugs? Revamping the Justice System?

Seriously. There are ways to generate money that don’t involve raising inome taxes.

18 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:45:50am

re: #3 Spocomptonite

Sign me up. My faith in this country is destroyed.

I’ve got family all over Europe. Norway it is.

19 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:45:56am

re: #16 FQ Kafir

[Link: orwell.ru…]

Congratulations. You’ve just described Fox News. Well done.

20 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:46:09am

re: #14 Spocomptonite

To me, that kind of stuff is the liberal version of Grants Gulch. It’s our country. Let’s work to make it better.

21 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:46:18am

re: #20 Obdicut

Galt’s. Whatever.

22 albusteve  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:47:37am

re: #10 Lidane

We NEED a revenue increase. It’s insane that the only solution the Republicans offer is to cut spending, but if you try to suggest ways of bringing more money in to start paying down what we owe, they act like you’re wanting to publicly rape them or something.

we need to get people back to work, and virtually nobody is helping that small detail along….the debt ceiling has nothing to do with future spending or budget cuts…generating revenue is the prime directive here, and outside of the ticky tack bullshit regarding this fight in congress, it has not been addressed that I can tell…none of it makes sense as Obdicut continuously points out with facts

23 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:48:09am

re: #16 FQ Kafir

[Link: orwell.ru…]

Did you not bother to read the rest of my post?

In what way is describing raising taxes as increasing revenue untrue?

24 allegro  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:48:44am

I just don’t understand all of this nonsense. Isn’t it time for Obama to step up, declare the 14th amendment in effect and put an end to it? I don’t get the reluctance when it is so clear that it’s that or default at this point.

25 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:48:50am

re: #23 Obdicut

Did you not bother to read the rest of my post?

In what way is describing raising taxes as increasing revenue untrue?

ZOMG DOUBLESPEAK!

26 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:50:13am

If we had the gold standard back, none of this would have happened in the first place!

27 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:50:13am

re: #8 FQ Kafir

Orwell would be so proud.

“Increasing revenue” and “balanced approach” have become catchphrases because “raising taxes” doesn’t seem to resonate with Americans.

Reuters/Ipsos Poll conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs. July 25, 2011

“As you probably know, the U.S. budget deficit is currently about 1.4 trillion dollars. There are a number of different solutions being discussed for reducing this deficit. These are cutting existing programs, raising taxes, or some combination of the two. Which approach do you think is best?”

Cut existing programs 19%
Raise taxes 12%
Combination 56%
Neither 8%

that is, raise taxes plus raise taxes and cut spending garners 68% in this poll

hold on and i’ll give you several more

28 Meitantei  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:50:51am

Well, uh, great.

Unfortunately for me, Japan’s been screwed up the last 20 years too. So sucks to be me.

29 albusteve  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:50:58am

re: #17 Lidane

Seriously. There are ways to generate money that don’t involve raising inome taxes.

clean up the fat….probably scores of billions per year….become more efficient….the govt is a black hole that sucks down money that never accomplishes anything

30 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:51:10am

re: #24 allegro

I just don’t understand all of this nonsense. Isn’t it time for Obama to step up, declare the 14th amendment in effect and put an end to it? I don’t get the reluctance when it is so clear that it’s that or default at this point.

This is either the most elaborate game of rope-a-dope ever or an elaborate suicide in slow motion.

Either Obama is letting the Republicans firmly expose themselves as the party willing to destroy this country to save their rich friends before he swoops in with the 14th Amendment, or we are well and truly fucked by both parties and are in deeper shit than any of us realized until now.

31 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:51:14am

re: #23 Obdicut

It’s not that it’s untrue, it’s that you need to change the term to make it more palatable.

Kinda like Global Warming became “Climate Change.”

32 allegro  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:52:33am

re: #30 Lidane

This is either the most elaborate game of rope-a-dope ever or an elaborate suicide in slow motion.

Either Obama is letting the Republicans firmly expose themselves as the party willing to destroy this country to save their rich friends before he swoops in with the 14th Amendment, or we are well and truly fucked by both parties and are in deeper shit than any of us realized until now.

I’m increasingly concerned that it’s the latter.

33 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:52:53am

re: #31 FQ Kafir

Oh look, a Tea Party Denier.

Go back to bashing poor people please. Your not wanted here.

34 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:53:17am

…but before i get around to that, here’s a poll result from a notorious liberal leftist propaganda mill run by george soros and the illuminati:

Fox News Poll June 26-28, 2011

“Would you favor or oppose a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution if it meant major spending cuts to entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security?”

favor 31%
oppose 63%

35 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:53:30am

If the TEA Party had any knowledge of history, they’d know that we weren’t what they think we are today if we hadn’t spent so much before/during WWII that our debt was 20% higher in terms of GDP than it is today. America was something of a global isolationist backwater pre-WWII, and then we spent GOBS of money modernizing our virtually all our industries, a power infrastructure, irrigation projects, rebuilding virtually all the participants of WWII (on both sides, no less), and finally, an interstate highway system that we stole from Germany after seeing how awesome it was when we invaded.
No country ever became great by doing nothing. Thanks TP for leading us down the road to suckage because y’all are too ignorant to know that.

36 allegro  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:53:53am

re: #33 ProLifeLiberal

Oh look, a Tea Party Denier.

Go back to bashing poor people please. Your not wanted here.

WTF?

37 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:54:09am

And this song just came up on Turntable:

38 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:54:19am

re: #31 FQ Kafir

It’s not that it’s untrue, it’s that you need to change the term to make it more palatable.”

That is not Orwellian language, no. Especially since the american public supports raising taxes. I don’t expect you to be able to admit that reality, of course.

Kinda like Global Warming became “Climate Change.

Well, that’s a lie, or ignorance on your part. Global warming is causing climate change. They’re both occurring. Climate change is a better description of what’s actually happening.

39 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:54:29am

re: #33 ProLifeLiberal

Typical… I have never bashed poor people. I make less than 25k/year.

40 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:54:33am

re: #20 Obdicut

To me, that kind of stuff is the liberal version of Grants Gulch. It’s our country. Let’s work to make it better.

Well, if you take it seriously it is. I was just joking around with a subject that’s very difficult to find the humor in.

41 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:54:35am

re: #24 allegro

I just don’t understand all of this nonsense. Isn’t it time for Obama to step up, declare the 14th amendment in effect and put an end to it? I don’t get the reluctance when it is so clear that it’s that or default at this point.

That would spawn a shit-storm that defies description.

In a way, I sort of hope it happens.

Then we might as well elect Michele Bachmann president in 2012. If we’re hell-bent on jumping off a cliff, we might as well get a running start so we can do some fancy-ass gymnastics on the way down.

42 webevintage  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:54:42am

re: #27 engineer dog

Reuters/Ipsos Poll conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs. July 25, 2011

that is, raise taxes plus raise taxes and cut spending garners 68% in this poll

hold on and i’ll give you several more

It is amazing that NO ONE seems to be paying attention to this.
All the Congress seems to be paying attention too is what the Tea Party wants, when they obviously do not represent the majority of voters in this country.

43 albusteve  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:55:13am

the US is not going to be destroyed, that hysteria….as for a default, I still say there will be none….the Aug 2nd deadline is a ruse, there will be nearly another week before an actual crisis becomes a threat

44 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:55:25am

re: #42 webevintage

It is amazing that NO ONE seems to be paying attention to this.
All the Congress seems to be paying attention too is what the Tea Party wants, when they obviously do not represent the majority of voters in this country.

Being a rampantly cynical fuck, I’ll believe that when the election numbers reflect it.

45 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:55:41am

re: #39 FQ Kafir

Typical… I have never bashed poor people. I make less than 25k/year.

And yet you’re dumb enough to buy into the tea party and Fox News lies at less than 25k?

Talk about a self-defeating agenda. You’re voting against your own interests.

46 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:57:02am

re: #30 Lidane

This is either the most elaborate game of rope-a-dope ever or an elaborate suicide in slow motion.

Either Obama is letting the Republicans firmly expose themselves as the party willing to destroy this country to save their rich friends before he swoops in with the 14th Amendment, or we are well and truly fucked by both parties and are in deeper shit than any of us realized until now.

It’s getting to the point where I am wondering if Obama isn’t just curled up under his desk in the fetal position rocking back and forth and sucking his thumb. WTF is he doing? Why won’t he get out there, and start pounding the fucking podium FDR-style. Mock the GOP, shame them, call them traitors, monsters, and do it with charts and graphs.

The facts are so amazingly on the his side, I can’t understand why he won’t use them, loudly. Angrily. Summon some rage, mr. super-diplomat! Show a few fucking pie charts illustrating how unequally the wealth is distributed. Make a full-throated defense of progressive taxation. Explain why the super rich are paying less taxes proportionally than the poor.

For fuck’s sake, Obama, LEAD!

47 Sol Berdinowitz  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:57:05am

re: #2 Obdicut

Why don’t you guys understand things like the velocity of money?

money should be in gold, which is inert.

/

48 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:57:23am

re: #42 webevintage

It is amazing that NO ONE seems to be paying attention to this.
All the Congress seems to be paying attention too is what the Tea Party wants, when they obviously do not represent the majority of voters in this country.

EXACTLY.

People know that the only way out of this mess is to cut what we’re spending and bring more money in to start paying down the debts we owe. It’s just these tea party assholes who insist on ideological purity that are going to send us into default.

49 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:57:24am

re: #32 allegro

I’m increasingly concerned that it’s the latter.

Well, elections have consequences. We really did elect this swathe of morons. Many on the right convinced themselves somehow that it’d be okay, that these jerks would fall into line, that they wouldn’t do exactly what they were saying they were going to do. They voted for them. And these guys got into office, and they control the House.

I personally feel the debt ceiling as it stands is an unconstitutional law; if congress authorizes spending, then, to me, they’re automatically authorizing paying for that spending. These are bills that are due; not paying them is not actually an option.

But invoking the 14th is difficult to do. This isn’t the only thing the government has to do. If Obama throws down that gauntlet, I’d fully expect the GOP to stop all legislation in its entirety, and anything that was absolutely vital would be crammed with poison pills.

Invoking the 14th won’t make these freaks vanish.

50 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:57:54am

re: #43 albusteve

With what the Republicans want to do, I’ll never be able to find work.

Autism is a pre-existing condition, and I won’t be able to buy health insurance. Companies won’t hire me because of the act I will be a drain on their coffers. And the Feds won’t be hiring for 30 years at this rate.

Better for me to go somewhere I will have a chance to get a job and not be homeless. Somewhere with a safety net.

51 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:58:13am

Perfect Scrambled Eggs Breakfast

52 allegro  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:59:08am

re: #41 negativ

That would spawn a shit-storm that defies description.

In a way, I sort of hope it happens.

Then we might as well elect Michele Bachmann president in 2012. If we’re hell-bent on jumping off a cliff, we might as well get a running start so we can do some fancy-ass gymnastics on the way down.

I’m not convinced of that result. The shit-storm certainly but so what? The tea nutters are always ready to throw tantrums so let ‘em. This issue has gained so much traction in the MSM that most people are aware of what’s going on and as we’re seeing in poll examples above from engineer dog the majority is clearly behind resolution. I think Obama’s popularity would increase considerably if he took this action and any impeachment efforts would just make the GOP look ever more stupid.

53 albusteve  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:59:48am

re: #46 Fozzie Bear

It’s getting to the point where I am wondering if Obama isn’t just curled up under his desk in the fetal position rocking back and forth and sucking his thumb. WTF is he doing? Why won’t he get out there, and start pounding the fucking podium FDR-style. Mock the GOP, shame them, call them traitors, monsters, and do it with charts and graphs.

The facts are so amazingly on the his side, I can’t understand why he won’t use them, loudly. Angrily. Summon some rage, mr. super-diplomat! Show a few fucking pie charts illustrating how unequally the wealth is distributed. Make a full-throated defense of progressive taxation. Explain why the super rich are paying less taxes proportionally than the poor.

For fuck’s sake, Obama, LEAD!

last week I suggested BO was out of the loop and got pounded….he’s busy spamming Twitter….LOL!

54 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 11:59:59am

re: #50 ProLifeLiberal

With what the Republicans want to do, I’ll never be able to find work.

Autism is a pre-existing condition, and I won’t be able to buy health insurance. Companies won’t hire me because of the act I will be a drain on their coffers. And the Feds won’t be hiring for 30 years at this rate.

Better for me to go somewhere I will have a chance to get a job and not be homeless. Somewhere with a safety net.

Europe.

55 RadicalModerate  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:00:24pm

re: #39 FQ Kafir

I’ve always meant to ask, what is the genesis of your username? It sounds a lot like a racist epithet used in S. Africa.

(fyi: “Kaffir”, sometimes spelled as “kafir” is the African equivalent of the N-word used in the United States)

[Link: en.wikipedia.org…]

56 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:00:29pm

re: #46 Fozzie Bear

He’s said a lot of those things. Are you saying that he’s not being angry enough when he’s saying them?

57 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:01:01pm

re: #8 FQ Kafir

Orwell would be so proud.

“Increasing revenue” and “balanced approach” have become catchphrases because “raising taxes” doesn’t seem to resonate with Americans.

I’m probably going to repeat myself but the Bush tax cuts were not meant to be permanent. The whole idea behind the Bush tax cuts was to provide a stimulus as in the second round called “Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003.” Both have been in effect since 2001. The right wing meme is that it creates jobs. If it has I’m not seeing it at all as this country has been in a deep recession since October of 2008.

At the same time the gap between the working/middle class and the rich continues to grow. The rich are indeed getting richer while the rest of us have seen not only unemployment or underemployment but flat or downward wage growth and rising energy and housing/rental prices. Meanwhile, the pigs rich are still eating at the trough of the Bush tax cuts claiming that their tax cuts make jobs. Those jobs of course are for those manufacturers of luxury items and illegal labor for their nannies and landscape help.

58 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:01:04pm

re: #46 Fozzie Bear

The facts are so amazingly on the his side, I can’t understand why he won’t use them, loudly. Angrily. Summon some rage, mr. super-diplomat! Show a few fucking pie charts illustrating how unequally the wealth is distributed. Make a full-throated defense of progressive taxation. Explain why the super rich are paying less taxes proportionally than the poor.

I’d love to see that. Just spend the next two days on TV pulling a Ross Perot — pie charts, graphs, everything imaginable to show just how wrong the GOP are and how dishonest they’ve been.

At this point, I’m increasingly worried that we’re just well and truly fucked.

Unbelievable. We’re going to default solely due to political incompetence.

59 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:03:11pm

re: #50 ProLifeLiberal

Autism is a pre-existing condition, and I won’t be able to buy health insurance.

Hold on. What kind?

60 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:03:23pm

re: #43 albusteve

the US is not going to be destroyed, that hysteria…as for a default, I still say there will be none…the Aug 2nd deadline is a ruse, there will be nearly another week before an actual crisis becomes a threat

Steve…
okay, so you know how banks work, right? they take deposits, and make money by lending it out with interest. But they can’t loan it all out, or else they’ll have liquidity problems. And legal problems, since that’s illegal.

So, instead of just having pallets of cash, sitting there, doing nothing, they invest in bonds, much like they did with mortgages. Because the U.S. treasury bonds have been such a financial Rock of Gibraltar the world over, even foreign banks do this, and they do it a lot, in addition to keeping actual pallets of US cash on hand.

A default will affect the value of all those bonds, a missed interest payment will be an immediate loss to nearly every bank on the planet, and the corresponding dent to our already plummeting dollar will further take banking assets down. In effect, we’re watching the mortgage crisis happen again, only with bonds this time.

61 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:03:47pm

re: #51 Killgore Trout

Perfect Scrambled Eggs Breakfast

[Video]

I’m 10 seconds in and he hasn’t said “fuck” once. What’s the deal?!?

62 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:03:59pm

Pew Research Center. July 20-24, 2011.

“In your view, what is the best way to reduce the federal budget deficit? Should we mostly focus on cutting major programs, mostly focus on increasing taxes, or should we do a combination of both?”

Cutting programs 19%
Increasing taxes 8%
Combination 60%

CNN/ORC Poll. July 18-20, 2011

“In those discussions, several budget plans have been proposed that would reduce the amount the government owes by trillions of dollars over the next ten years. If you had to choose, would you rather see Congress and President Obama agree to a budget plan that only includes cuts in government spending, or a budget plan that includes a combination of spending cuts and tax increases on higher-income Americans and some businesses?”

Spending cuts only 34%
Spending cuts and tax increases 64%

CBS News Poll. July 15-17, 2011

“Do you think an agreement on the budget and the debt ceiling should include only tax increases, OR only spending cuts, OR a combination of both tax increases and spending cuts?”

Only tax increases 3%
Only spending cuts 28%
Combination 66%

WHY ARE THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS HELD HOSTAGE BY A MINORITY OF AMERCIANS?

i think they should pass a bill with tax increases in it and get all the democrats in the house plus enough republicans to pass that bill

boner should realize that the teabaggers are not his friends and are only out for his ass, and tell them to get fucked

63 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:04:27pm

re: #61 negativ

I’m 10 seconds in and he hasn’t said “fuck” once. What’s the deal?!?

Wait until he burns the toast

64 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:04:42pm

re: #54 laZardo

My grandfather is in contact with the family in Norway. That’s my bet.

re: #39 FQ Kafir

So, in other words, you are too ignorant to see the deleterious effects the Republican Policies will have on you.

Like some many others, you think it is more important to hate the fact that a black guy is in the White House.

65 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:05:22pm

re: #35 Spocomptonite

If the TEA Party had any knowledge of history

if the tea party weren’t being fed a steady diet of outrageous and evil lies

66 blueraven  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:06:29pm

re: #8 FQ Kafir

Orwell would be so proud.

“Increasing revenue” and “balanced approach” have become catchphrases because “raising taxes” doesn’t seem to resonate with Americans.

And raising taxes has been used to describe an agreed upon end date for a temporary tax cut. A tax cut that barely passed because even republicans knew it was a bad idea in the midst of two wars.

67 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:06:55pm

re: #64 ProLifeLiberal

I think his name is meant to reference a variation on infidel in Arabic, rather than as a racial slur. Seems more likely.

And as much as I think the guy is dead wrong, just insulting him isn’t going to change his mind.

68 albusteve  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:07:23pm

re: #60 Spocomptonite

Steve…
okay, so you know how banks work, right? they take deposits, and make money by lending it out with interest. But they can’t loan it all out, or else they’ll have liquidity problems. And legal problems, since that’s illegal.

So, instead of just having pallets of cash, sitting there, doing nothing, they invest in bonds, much like they did with mortgages. Because the U.S. treasury bonds have been such a financial Rock of Gibraltar the world over, even foreign banks do this, and they do it a lot, in addition to keeping actual pallets of US cash on hand.

A default will affect the value of all those bonds, a missed interest payment will be an immediate loss to nearly every bank on the planet, and the corresponding dent to our already plummeting dollar will further take banking assets down. In effect, we’re watching the mortgage crisis happen again, only with bonds this time.

there will be no default….freaking out about it give something to post about tho….I just don’t think it’s going to happen so whatever the results of a default would be are moot at this point….interesting tho

69 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:07:51pm

re: #67 Obdicut

I know I get change this dullard’s mind.

I need to vent my hopelessness. He’s provided himself a good target.

70 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:08:04pm

re: #66 blueraven

And raising taxes has been used to describe an agreed upon end date for a temporary tax cut. A tax cut that barely passed because even republicans knew it was a bad idea in the midst of two wars.

Yeah but Iraqi oil revenue will pay for the war!

//

71 Big Steve  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:08:56pm

Lets think about all this. China is rapidly increasing in wealth as are its citizens. Chinese people for the first time ever have extra cash and they are choosing to invest it. They appear to be willing to take virtually trivial interest rates just to get safety. US Treasury Bonds are just about the worst growth investment around but they are safe…..like putting your money under a mattress that is located in Fort Knox. What this allows is the US government to function and invest in itself and probably through second or third order harmonics stimulate the US economy. If the same investors fled the US Bonds where would they put their money? Probably in other investments that more directly stimulate the economy. In fact second best to US Treasury Bonds in safety and better interest rates are good old fashion Municipal bonds. I think actually this would be a better thing for just about everyone. It is a more direct stimulus. So I vote….let the US government default.

72 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:06pm

re: #70 Gus 802

Yeah but Iraqi oil revenue will pay for the war!

//

We’ll be greeted as liberators!

73 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:06pm

re: #68 albusteve

Even if there isn’t a default, those who are poor and have disabilities are screwed.

Why do you think I’m considering leaving? Because I won’t be able to have a life worth living here.

74 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:15pm

re: #51 Killgore Trout
also:

[Link: www.southparkstudios.com…]

I may take some cooking classes. “Bob” help me.

75 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:24pm

re: #67 Obdicut

I just clicked on your avatar. Little did I know we were both married to the same woman. There can’t be two “of the most beautiful, amazing woman” alive can there. :)

76 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:34pm

A war that costs us 100 dollars per load of laundry.

The “no-bid contract war” with Blackwater and billions of dollars of missing cash.

77 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:43pm

U.S. Contingency Plan Gives Bondholders Priority

The U.S. Treasury will give priority to making interest payments to holders of government bonds when due if lawmakers fail to reach an agreement to raise the debt ceiling, according to an administration official.

The official requested anonymity because no announcement has been made. The Treasury has said about $90 billion in debt matures on Aug. 4 and more than $30 billion in interest comes due Aug. 15. Overall, more than $500 billion matures in August.

[Link: www.bloomberg.com…]

hmmm

78 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:47pm

re: #66 blueraven

And raising taxes has been used to describe an agreed upon end date for a temporary tax cut. A tax cut that barely passed because even republicans knew it was a bad idea in the midst of two wars.

This is an important point. That original tax cut was not popular, and at the time many, many people warned that a tax cut during wartime with our levels of spending would lead to massive deficits very quickly if the expended growth didn’t occur. It didn’t occur, and we already faced a massive deficit even before the financial meltdown happened.

So, the logical conclusion should have been that those tax cuts didn’t work in stimulating growth, and also causes us a huge problem in increasing the deficit, so it was time to end them.

Instead, most in the GOP prefer to pretend our taxes have always been at this level, or that this is a high level for our taxes to be at. They try to confuse the issue by babbling about how much the top 1% pays in income tax (while not mentioning how much of the wealth they own), etc.

This just happened. This was within the last decade. How can people have fooled themselves that quickly? Did they just never pay attention in the first place?

79 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:09:59pm

re: #72 Kid A

We’ll be greeted as liberators!

We should be out of there in 2 weeks top.

//

80 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:10:03pm

re: #70 Gus 802

Yeah but Iraqi Libyan oil revenue will pay for the war!

//

FTFY, because Iraq was soooo last decade.

81 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:10:36pm

re: #79 Gus 802

We should be out of there in 2 weeks top.

//

It’s a slam dunk, Mr. President!!
///

82 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:10:42pm

re: #74 negativ

also:

[Link: www.southparkstudios.com…]

I may take some cooking classes. “Bob” help me.

That was a great episode.

83 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:11:24pm

re: #56 Obdicut

He’s said a lot of those things. Are you saying that he’s not being angry enough when he’s saying them?

I’m saying that for a man as apparently intelligent as Obama, he is doing a really shitty job of making his case. He is more Chamberlain than Churchill, and apparently has little or no understanding of the game he is playing.

The case he needs to make practically makes itself. He needs to tell the people they are being fucked. He needs to lend a voice to the rage people are feeling, by expressing it in his own voice. Go look at some FDR speeches. Go look at some Reagan speeches. Then look at one of Obama’s recent pressers about “compromise”, then tell me it doesn’t make you want to tear your hair out.

This isn’t compromise. This is bending over and taking it like a victim.

He needs to go Ross Perot with charts and graphs. He needs to talk about social justice. He needs to yell. It’s long past time. He needs to get in the fucking trenches and tear off some masks. He needs to get nasty, because the people with whom he is dealing are nasty people.

“Sit down Eric!” doesn’t cut it. Explaining the moral bankruptcy of Cantor’s Randian roots is what needs to happen. The GOP is monstrous, and he keeps trying to sit down and have tea with the beast, and politely engage it in conversation.

it’s not encouraging. Not at all.

84 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:11:26pm

re: #71 Big Steve

Lets think about all this. China is rapidly increasing in wealth as are its citizens. Chinese people for the first time ever have extra cash and they are choosing to invest it. They appear to be willing to take virtually trivial interest rates just to get safety. US Treasury Bonds are just about the worst growth investment around but they are safe…like putting your money under a mattress that is located in Fort Knox. What this allows is the US government to function and invest in itself and probably through second or third order harmonics stimulate the US economy. If the same investors fled the US Bonds where would they put their money? Probably in other investments that more directly stimulate the economy. In fact second best to US Treasury Bonds in safety and better interest rates are good old fashion Municipal bonds. I think actually this would be a better thing for just about everyone. It is a more direct stimulus. So I vote…let the US government default.

Well, considering how most municipal bonds are to finance things in conjunction with federal financing, I’m thinking it’s going to be a cascade effect.

85 Stanghazi  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:11:50pm

re: #70 Gus 802

Yeah but Iraqi oil revenue will pay for the war!

//

That one STILL kills me. What a great lie. Oh and the missing pallets of cash? Nah, let’s focus on the debt limit. They are actually taking the easy road. Let’s focus on the ridiculous, then we won’t have to deal with the hard stuff. Like fucking jobs.

86 Big Steve  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:12:16pm

re: #60 Spocomptonite

you miss an interest payment on something that is giving 2% per annum growth? That is like $1600 per million invested per month. That is not going to trigger any runs on any banks. Further the capital is safe.

87 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:12:40pm

re: #71 Big Steve

You forgot your sarc tags.

88 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:12:57pm

re: #44 laZardo

Being a rampantly cynical fuck, I’ll believe that when the election numbers reflect it.

2004 : republican president, senate, & house

2006 : republican president and senate, democratic house

2008 : democratic president, house, and senate

2010 : democratic president and senate, republican house

plenty to work with there for people who believe that they can interpret election results in terms of ideological agendas

you can’t

89 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:12:58pm

re: #79 Gus 802

We should be out of there in 2 weeks top.

//

Some economists wrote a book a few years ago called the three-trillion dollar war, or something to that effect. Anyway, about a year ago they came back and said “Whoopsie! Our estimates were too conservative. Make it 5 trillion.”

90 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:12:59pm

re: #80 laZardo

Oh god, not this again.

This cost of Libya has been less than a thousandth of Iraq.

Why in God’s Green Earth do you like defending Genocidal Dictators?

91 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:13:02pm

re: #72 Kid A

We’ll be greeted as liberators!

The war will take weeks, not months! (Cheney actually said that.)

92 makeitstop  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:13:05pm

re: #52 allegro

I’m not convinced of that result. The shit-storm certainly but so what? The tea nutters are always ready to throw tantrums so let ‘em. This issue has gained so much traction in the MSM that most people are aware of what’s going on and as we’re seeing in poll examples above from engineer dog the majority is clearly behind resolution. I think Obama’s popularity would increase considerably if he took this action and any impeachment efforts would just make the GOP look ever more stupid.

Obama should let the clock run out, then address the nation and tell them that by Executive Order, he is placing the pay of all members of Congress into an escrow fund that will be sent to each rep’s home district to help those districts pay their bills, and no member of Congress will see a dime of pay until they get real and straighten this out. Then announce that he’s ready to defend himself against any legal action the opposition will take.

2012 would see a landslide that would dwarf Reagan-Mondale.

93 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:13:18pm

re: #81 Kid A

It’s a slam dunk, Mr. President!!
///

Mission Accomplished

Oops.

94 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:13:23pm

re: #70 Gus 802

Yeah but Iraqi oil revenue will pay for the war!

//

re: #72 Kid A

We’ll be greeted as liberators!

I still can’t believe so many people bought into both of those lines of bullshit. Amazing.

95 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:13:37pm

re: #46 Fozzie Bear

It’s getting to the point where I am wondering if Obama isn’t just curled up under his desk in the fetal position rocking back and forth and sucking his thumb. WTF is he doing? Why won’t he get out there, and start pounding the fucking podium FDR-style. Mock the GOP, shame them, call them traitors, monsters, and do it with charts and graphs.

If one believes the polls, most people already do not believe that the very rich should get a free pass. None of the spending cuts will affect them in any significant way. They don’t need Medicare, Medicaid or SS and if a state park is closed they can fly to one in Europe. So they should get a further tax break?/

I don’t either understand how the Democrats have been unable to make better use of this argument. The TV pundits and representative of the TP only change the subject and make speeches about jobs when asked, and then they are allowed to get away with it without challenge, even on MSNBC.

It’s depressing.

96 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:14:21pm

re: #90 ProLifeLiberal

Oh god, not this again.

This cost of Libya has been less than a thousandth of Iraq.

Why in God’s Green Earth do you like defending Genocidal Dictators?

I never said Gaddafi wasn’t a douchebag. What the hell.

And we’ve only been there for three months as compared to seven and ten years for the other armed campaigns. Give it a year or so, then we’ll see the costs starting to add up.

Costs we can’t afford.

97 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:14:47pm

re: #93 Gus 802

Oops.

Derp!

98 Stanghazi  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:14:59pm

re: #81 Kid A

It’s a slam dunk, Mr. President!!
///

Blessed by god. Remember the Rumsfeld reports with the bible quotes as the cover?? ? ?

GAH

99 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:15:17pm

re: #92 makeitstop

Obama should let the clock run out, then address the nation and tell them that by Executive Order, he is placing the pay of all members of Congress into an escrow fund that will be sent to each rep’s home district to help those districts pay their bills, and no member of Congress will see a dime of pay until they get real and straighten this out. Then announce that he’s ready to defend himself against any legal action the opposition will take.

2012 would see a landslide that would dwarf Reagan-Mondale.

I’d be amazed if he did something like that.

I doubt it will happen, though.

100 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:15:30pm

re: #91 Fozzie Bear

The war will take weeks, not months! (Cheney actually said that.)

Flowers and candy from the citizens!
//

101 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:15:36pm

re: #88 engineer dog

2004 : republican president, senate, & house

2006 : republican president and senate, democratic house

2008 : democratic president, house, and senate

2010 : democratic president and senate, republican house

plenty to work with there for people who believe that they can interpret election results in terms of ideological agendas

you can’t

I meant more like I’m not going to be fully convinced that the majority will think that the Republicans are on the right side of things until the day after Election Day 2012.

102 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:15:58pm

re: #90 ProLifeLiberal

Oh god, not this again.

This cost of Libya has been less than a thousandth of Iraq.

Why in God’s Green Earth do you like defending Genocidal Dictators?

Are you serious? Why don’t you just ask him why he hates America? This is a bullshit arguing tactic, you know it, and you should be ashamed.

103 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:16:10pm

re: #96 laZardo

The cost of Libya are slower to rise than that of either Iraq and Afghanistan.

I’ve gotten fed up with both the debt ceiling, and those saying that it would have been okay to let Qaddafi do what he wanted.

So I’ve decided the best way to handle this is to attack the other side.

104 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:16:17pm

re: #60 Spocomptonite

..and then when the Chinese are offered some treasury securities they will say ok, but add another half point or so the interest, and overnight that will hit my rates. I want the TP to tell me how that is any different from a tax hike on me.

105 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:16:25pm

re: #83 Fozzie Bear

Ross Perot not only lost the election, he’s now a figure of risiblity. I have no idea why people are suddenly referencing his style as though it’s awesome.

I think the problem is the lack of attention on the part of the American people, not Obama. They sincerely have not shown that they give much of a shit. The GOP stated that they were going to do shit like this in their campaigns. The Tea Party idiots were obviously the kind to do this. And yet they got elected. Rand Paul got elected. The Ryan plan was greated as though it was sensible. Obama eviscerated it, and called it a fake plan, which it was— and very few people, proportionally speaking, paid attention to the whole thing.

You are feeling a lot of rage, I’m sure. But you’re you. Do you really, honestly think that the majority of America is even clued into what’s happening right now?

In order for Obama’s message to communicate he’s got to get listened to in the first place. He’s said everything there is to say about the necessity to raise taxes over and over and over. He’s pointed out that Ryan’s plan and much of the GOP thinking is complete fallacy. He hasn’t screamed about it, but screaming only actually gets more people to hear you if you’re in a very small room.

106 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:16:53pm

Great interactive graph from the Minneapolis Fed showing how well this administration has handled our fiscal matters.

[Link: www.theatlantic.com…]

When will reasonable people on the left start to admit that Obama’s policies aren’t working? Maybe even hurting?

107 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:17:17pm

re: #96 laZardo

I never said Gaddafi wasn’t a douchebag. What the hell.

And we’ve only been there for three months as compared to seven and ten years for the other armed campaigns. Give it a year or so, then we’ll see the costs starting to add up.

Costs we can’t afford.

I think the bigger mistake was Bush and Blair normalizing relations with Libya and freeing the Lockerbie bomber. I”m glad Obama is participating in the in effort to kill Q’Daffy.

108 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:17:22pm

re: #89 Kid A

Some economists wrote a book a few years ago called the three-trillion dollar war, or something to that effect. Anyway, about a year ago they came back and said “Whoopsie! Our estimates were too conservative. Make it 5 trillion.”

What are the projected final costs going to be? I mean after “penalties and interest”. It’s going to be another Spanish-American War tax for the next 100 years not doubt. The final cost will be more than the actual current cost. It has to be. They don’t include long term care of veterans either in their calculations.

109 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:17:46pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

Whoops…. I meant this link:

[Link: www.minneapolisfed.org…]

110 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:18:42pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

Why are you pretending Obama’s policies have been in play? Desperately compromised policies have been in play, forced into being by a historically obstructionist GOP.

So can you explain why you’re calling the policies those of this administration?

111 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:18:56pm

re: #77 000G

U.S. Contingency Plan Gives Bondholders Priority

[Link: www.bloomberg.com…]

hmmm

Good priority: Social Security holds $2.5 trillion in bonds. How about the size of that missed payment, Big Steve?

112 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:19:20pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

I guarantee there is something your not telling us. Your side distorts things to often.

But now I have a pincushion to vent at, so it’s a little better. Considering people like you will ruin any chance I have of a good life here, I think however I decide to treat you will be deserved.

113 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:19:25pm

re: #108 Gus 802

What are the projected final costs going to be? I mean after “penalties and interest”. It’s going to be another Spanish-American War tax for the next 100 years not doubt. The final cost will be more than the actual current cost. It has to be. They don’t include long term care of veterans either in their calculations.

Gus, actually all that is taken into account. I mean, these dudes really get into the nuts and bolts. Think projected spending by casualties, costs of divorce by grieving parents. You name it, it’s there. And it’s REAL. If any politician read it, they never, ever would’ve supported the war in Iraq.

114 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:19:28pm

I know it’s like beating the dead horse and all that, but I can’t get over it. The West’s Darkest Hour doubles down:

Do you know that through the novels Harry never uses “Avara Kadavra”, the killing spell against the bad guys? He merely uses the disarming charm, “Expelliarmus.” But only in the movies for children the Harry characters win. In real life you have to make a transition to the dark side to become a good soldier.

I have read The Turner Diaries twice. When I read it for the first time I didn’t like the Breivik-like cruelties: for example the killing of an innocent black—the first killing of the novel—or an entire group of nationalist white warriors in Toronto for not taking care of the Jewish Problem almost at the end of the Holy Racial War. And in the Day of the Rope many innocent young women (and men) also die. Then I read Covington’s Quartet. I sensed a moral difference. Covington’s characters are not so cruel, in the sense of so many innocents dying too, as Pierce’s characters. I imagine myself doing the things in Covington’s novels. But some passages of the Diaries make me wonder…

But you know? Pierce was ultimately right. As soldiers of The Order, we must be like the walking dead. The difference with the Quartet (Uncle Harold hasn’t finished the fifth novel) and the Diaries is that in Pierce’s world not only an ethno-state is born: in the final pages it’s described that only the white race shall inherit the Earth.

This final item of the Diaries is too strong meat to digest in a mere blog comment and I won’t go further with that, save saying that if completely heartless people followed the cruel script you quoted above, the chances of setting fire on Europe by provoking the Muslim population that way would be infinitely greater than the Expelliarmus charm that this blogsite seems to promote.

115 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:19:45pm

Does anybody else get the feeling that Obama will have some competition for the 2012 Dem Nomination? Hillary, maybe?

116 Stanghazi  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:20:07pm

re: #92 makeitstop

Obama should let the clock run out, then address the nation and tell them that by Executive Order, he is placing the pay of all members of Congress into an escrow fund that will be sent to each rep’s home district to help those districts pay their bills, and no member of Congress will see a dime of pay until they get real and straighten this out. Then announce that he’s ready to defend himself against any legal action the opposition will take.

2012 would see a landslide that would dwarf Reagan-Mondale.

I know I read too many political blogs. The average Joe has no idea, but seriously the talk I’ve seen of impeachment attempts makes me freak. If Pres. Obama gets in any way uppity I fear were in for another ride. :(((

117 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:20:17pm

re: #115 FQ Kafir

Does anybody else get the feeling that Obama will have some competition for the 2012 Dem Nomination? Hillary, maybe?

Highly doubtful, but Bernie Sanders said as much last week.

118 blueraven  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:20:37pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

Great interactive graph from the Minneapolis Fed showing how well this administration has handled our fiscal matters.

[Link: www.theatlantic.com…]

When will reasonable people on the left start to admit that Obama’s policies aren’t working? Maybe even hurting?

What these charts show is this: The economic downturn beginning in 2007 was much deeper than originally thought.

Analysts also thought, as recently as twelve hours ago, that the economy declined 6.8% and 4.9% in the quarters bisected by Obama’s inauguration. It turns out the actual declines were much steeper: 8.9% and 6.7%.

To adopt the president’s favorite metaphor of the ditch and the driver: The ditch was a 33% deeper than we thought. And we’re driving 33% slower than we hoped. Take a look at these graphs, via Economist, to soak it in:

119 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:20:43pm

re: #112 ProLifeLiberal

You seem like a lovely person.

120 HoosierHoops  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:20:51pm

re: #115 FQ Kafir

Does anybody else get the feeling that Obama will have some competition for the 2012 Dem Nomination? Hillary, maybe?

You’re kidding I hope…

121 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:21:15pm

re: #115 FQ Kafir

Does anybody else get the feeling that Obama will have some competition for the 2012 Dem Nomination? Hillary, maybe?

How about you try to actually participate in a conversation, instead of throwing out chum?

122 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:21:18pm

re: #96 laZardo

I never said Gaddafi wasn’t a douchebag. What the hell.

And we’ve only been there for three months as compared to seven and ten years for the other armed campaigns. Give it a year or so, then we’ll see the costs starting to add up.

Costs we can’t afford.

We are there? What are we doing that we wouldn’t be doing with our normal staffing commitments to NATO? We aren’t flying anything but some drones perhaps.

123 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:21:30pm

re: #116 Stanley Sea

I know I read too many political blogs. The average Joe has no idea, but seriously the talk I’ve seen of impeachment attempts makes me freak. If Pres. Obama gets in any way uppity I fear were in for another ride. :(((

If we can get you impeached for a blowjob, ya think we’re gonna stop with the Marxist Kenyan in the White House??!! Ha!

124 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:21:31pm

re: #115 FQ Kafir

Does anybody else get the feeling that Obama will have some competition for the 2012 Dem Nomination? Hillary, maybe?

Um, no.

125 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:21:56pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

Great interactive graph from the Minneapolis Fed showing how well this administration has handled our fiscal matters.

[Link: www.theatlantic.com…]

When will reasonable people on the left start to admit that Obama’s policies aren’t working? Maybe even hurting?

Obama’s policies? Which policy are you referring to, that is both enacted fully, and exists as proposed by Obama. Name ONE. Just one.

You are a fool. I mean that. You have been played like a violin by people who are taking everything you ever worked for away from you. You are cheering your own executioner, and I feel pity for you.

126 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:21:59pm

re: #121 Obdicut

How about you try to actually participate in a conversation, instead of throwing out chum?

That would involve actual thought and substance first.

127 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:22:19pm

re: #118 blueraven

Bush isn’t on the ticket in 2012. Obama will bear the brunt of responsibility.

Anyway, this is the link I meant to provide.

[Link: www.minneapolisfed.org…]

128 simoom  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:22:32pm

My take on the current outline is that if the super-committee has just one centrist Republican on it you’ll end up with something along the lines of the gang of six proposal, so lowered tax rates & increased revenue. This will be a total non-starter in the House so the Dems should make sure they’re willing to live with the trigger cuts mix (for example steeper pentagon cuts than the GOP would have let through normally) and they should at some point before the super-committee proposal vote make public that the expiration of the Bush tax cuts will be part of the trigger fallback.

129 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:22:52pm

re: #113 Kid A

Gus, actually all that is taken into account. I mean, these dudes really get into the nuts and bolts. Think projected spending by casualties, costs of divorce by grieving parents. You name it, it’s there. And it’s REAL. If any politician read it, they never, ever would’ve supported the war in Iraq.

OK. 5 trillion is way above the current cost of approximately 800 some odd billion for Iraq alone. Did they give a time frame for the “final payment”. I was thinking 100 years.

130 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:23:13pm

re: #125 Fozzie Bear

Obama’s policies? Which policy are you referring to, that is both enacted fully, and exists as proposed by Obama. Name ONE. Just one.

You are a fool. I mean that. You have been played like a violin by people who are taking everything you ever worked for away from you. You are cheering your own executioner, and I feel pity for you.

At this point, I’m convinced they’re just a bitter troll from the old days at LGF. I’m not giving their posts any real credence.

131 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:23:47pm

re: #115 FQ Kafir

Does anybody else get the feeling that Obama will have some competition for the 2012 Dem Nomination? Hillary, maybe?

i have a feeling that the gop make wake up in 2012 and find that they have thoroughly fucked themselves with the american people

after all, no matter how many times they have taken over all three branches of government in the past 45 years, they always have ended up fucking things up and getting thrown out

132 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:23:48pm

re: #127 FQ Kafir

Bush isn’t on the ticket in 2012. Obama will bear the brunt of responsibility.

Anyway, this is the link I meant to provide.

[Link: www.minneapolisfed.org…]

I’m sorry, but no. The Republican obstructionists with which Obama has tried too hard to compromise with are not going to take the concessions that they themselves wanted and say Obama is to blame for them existing.

133 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:23:57pm

re: #128 simoom

As I’ve read it, the triggered cuts are just normal cuts, and could be restored easily enough.

I otherwise agree with you— the committee will recommend tax increases.

I hope that they do include the triggered taxes along with the cuts. That’d be nice. I doubt it’ll happen, though, I think the Tea Party is too drunk with power right now and will be able to prevent any taxes being present in the bill at the moment.

134 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:24:01pm

Did it everre: #125 Fozzie Bear

Did it ever occur to you that the countries that lend us the money to spend like drunken sailors might start to ratchet down the spigot? Maybe even turn it off?

135 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:25:06pm

re: #134 FQ Kafir

Most debt is held not by foreign nations, but by Americans. You do know that, right?

136 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:25:15pm

by the way, just in case i haven’t said it enough

fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

FUCK

(refills available on request)

137 Stanghazi  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:25:17pm

re: #100 Kid A

Flowers and candy from the citizens!
//

You want bitter right now? Iraq does that to me. No candy and flowers when our fucking soldiers stalk, rape, and kill a girl and her family.

138 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:25:27pm

re: #134 FQ Kafir

If the Republicans lead us to default, that’s exactly what will happen.

Good job. Keep voting for the assholes that are going to ruin this country.

139 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:25:32pm

re: #119 FQ Kafir

Same goes to you.

I’m Autistic, and therefore, uninsurable (Pre-existing conditions and all that).

Obama’s plan, while not perfect, would cover me. Pigs like you want to repeal it, meaning no insurance. Combined with the fact that I won’t be hired by the private sector because I will cost too much for there insurance, and the government won’t hire until the Tea Party passes away (30+ years), and I have no chance for a good life here.

You decide to come in and be a moron, saying how good things would be i the Teabaggers were in charge. And knowing the consequences that would have for me, you made yourself a target. Deal with it and man up.

140 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:26:02pm

re: #129 Gus 802

Gus, I posted a page a few minutes ago about Gretchen Morgensen’s column today in the NY Times. Go check it out if you get a chance.

141 makeitstop  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:26:22pm

re: #99 Lidane

I’d be amazed if he did something like that.

I doubt it will happen, though.

Me, too, Lidane. Just a nice little daydeam to keep the Menacing Wold o Reality at bay for a bit.

Okay, I’m out. Everyone have as good a day as you can.

142 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:26:26pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

Great interactive graph from the Minneapolis Fed showing how well this administration has handled our fiscal matters.

[Link: www.theatlantic.com…]

When will reasonable people on the left start to admit that Obama’s policies aren’t working? Maybe even hurting?

It is always funny to listen to right wingers preach about the need for smaller government and lower taxes as the solution to everything, and then turn around and say that the President should be the one creating jobs, when he is a Democrat.

Do you see the cognitive dissonance here, particularly that so far during this administration the GOP got the tax breaks they wanted and the deficit and recession is of their making?

How many times do people like you need to be reminded that Bush was handed a surplus?

143 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:26:50pm

re: #134 FQ Kafir

Did it ever

Did it ever occur to you that the countries that lend us the money to spend like drunken sailors might start to ratchet down the spigot? Maybe even turn it off?

Did it ever occur to you that all foreign countries combined don’t hold as much of the debt as the federal government does itself?

144 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:27:41pm

re: #122 Naso Tang

We are there? What are we doing that we wouldn’t be doing with our normal staffing commitments to NATO? We aren’t flying anything but some drones perhaps.

More than that. Much more.

145 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:27:55pm

re: #134 FQ Kafir

Did it ever

Did it ever occur to you that the countries that lend us the money to spend like drunken sailors might start to ratchet down the spigot? Maybe even turn it off?

Yes, it absolutely has. That’s why the Bush tax cuts were a terrible idea, as was the unfunded drug mandate in Medicare, taking the two wars off the books, and waging them in the first place.

That’s why I have never voted republican, and I never will. They love to spend money, and they refuse to collect the funds to pay for the spending. It’s astounding to me that anybody would be dumb enough to blame this on Obama, but hey, humans can be pretty fucking stupid.

146 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:28:01pm

re: #142 Naso Tang

How many times do people like you need to be reminded that Bush was handed a surplus?

Facts are inconvenient things.
.

147 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:28:19pm

re: #134 FQ Kafir

Did it ever

Did it ever occur to you that the countries that lend us the money to spend like drunken sailors might start to ratchet down the spigot? Maybe even turn it off?

and every single one of these countries that has the cash to lend us is considerably more “socialist” than us

i wonder how that happened

148 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:28:58pm

Wow. Can any of you visualize a way to pay all of this money back?
This guy has his hands full just visualizing the money itself.
[Link: usdebt.kleptocracy.us…]

149 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:28:59pm

re: #114 Sergey Romanov

And these are ads in his frontpage:

#
The death of Nazi Germany was the death of Western man and everything he once stood for (click on the above pic).

#
The Holocaust of Ukrainians perpetrated by Jews

This is the guy to whom GoV _still links_.

150 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:29:09pm

re: #144 laZardo

That ended 4 MONTHS AGO!!!

151 blueraven  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:29:11pm

re: #127 FQ Kafir

Bush isn’t on the ticket in 2012. Obama will bear the brunt of responsibility.

Anyway, this is the link I meant to provide.

[Link: www.minneapolisfed.org…]

I dont give a damn what link you meant to post. This is the truth. In 2007 the economy was headed toward the cliff and in 2008 we hit the precipice, and you all try to pretend that is not so. Now we know just how bad it was. Jobs were disappearing at nearly 3/4 of a million a month by Jan 2009, revenues declined. This was not due to Obama, comprende?

152 simoom  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:29:37pm

re: #133 Obdicut

I hope that they do include the triggered taxes along with the cuts. That’d be nice. I doubt it’ll happen, though, I think the Tea Party is too drunk with power right now and will be able to prevent any taxes being present in the bill at the moment.

I don’t think it should be part of the current legislated trigger, just something the Dems eventually declare as part of the trigger months from now (since you could blow up the current deal and make the GOP make demands around the Bush Tax cuts to pass the debt ceiling increase). Since the Dems have full control over whether or not they’re allowed to expire they can raise them as a trigger consequence whenever it politically best suits them.

153 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:29:56pm

NATO was created for the Cold War. Time to pull out.

Next.

154 Kronocide  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:30:24pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

Great interactive graph from the Minneapolis Fed showing how well this administration has handled our fiscal matters.

[Link: www.theatlantic.com…]

When will reasonable people on the left start to admit that Obama’s policies aren’t working? Maybe even hurting?

What’s a ‘Minneapolis Fed?’

And how did you read that the information and opinions therein were an indictment of Obama’s policies?

155 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:30:37pm

re: #148 FQ Kafir

Wow. Can any of you visualize a way to pay all of this money back?
This guy has his hands full just visualizing the money itself.
[Link: usdebt.kleptocracy.us…]

Sure. Invest heavily in science, technology, infrastructure and education, provide a strong social net, and do massive investment in alternative energies.

historically, research into science, technology, infrastructure and education leads to national prosperity, so why wouldn’t it now?

I don’t expect you to actually answer, as you seem totally incapable of doing anything other than reciting tired talking points.

156 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:30:57pm

re: #148 FQ Kafir

Yeah. It’s called ‘raising taxes.’

However, ignorant little tards like yourself can’t bear the idea of helping a community, let alone a nation. You are too trapped in Ayn Rand’s myth of hyper-individualism.

157 bratwurst  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:31:02pm

re: #115 FQ Kafir

Does anybody else get the feeling that Obama will have some competition for the 2012 Dem Nomination? Hillary, maybe?

I think this scenario is exclusive to the fantasies of those on the right.

158 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:31:35pm

re: #152 simoom

Ah, agreed. It’s my understanding the McConnell bill can’t actually pass in time without unanimous consent to waive the 30 hour countdown. Is that true?

159 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:31:38pm

re: #144 laZardo

More than that. Much more.

I don’t know what you mean by much more. The US forces there are normally in the area. They don’t fly combat now in Libya.

160 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:31:41pm

re: #154 BigPapa

re: #155 Obdicut

do massive investment in alternative energies.

That worked out real well with Spain.

161 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:31:44pm

re: #155 Obdicut

Let me handle this.

I can be far more vicious than you.

162 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:31:57pm

re: #148 FQ Kafir

Wow. Can any of you visualize a way to pay all of this money back?
This guy has his hands full just visualizing the money itself.
[Link: usdebt.kleptocracy.us…]

No try imagining the combined income of a couple hundred million americans since Reagan. A little more taxation would’ve gone a long way in preventing this.

163 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:32:13pm

re: #161 ProLifeLiberal

I don’t think being vicious achieves anything other than easing your spleen for a moment, though.

164 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:32:20pm

Starting two wars while simultaneously cutting taxes is like taking out a huge loan for a new car and quitting your job on the same day. Sure, you can max out your credit cards for awhile and coast, but if you blame the car dealership later when when the bank comes and takes your car and your house, you are a fucking idiot.

This is where we are now. And instead of blaming the asshole that bought the car, we blame the bank.

The American people, as an aggregate, are hopelessly stupid.

165 Stanghazi  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:32:37pm

re: #124 Killgore Trout

Um, no.

Firebagger!

166 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:32:37pm

re: #160 FQ Kafir

re: #155 Obdicut

That worked out real well with Spain.

It works out real well for China.

167 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:33:15pm

re: #148 FQ Kafir

Wow. Can any of you visualize a way to pay all of this money back?
This guy has his hands full just visualizing the money itself.
[Link: usdebt.kleptocracy.us…]

never seemed to bother george bush or his buddies

or ronald reagan for that matter

“ronald reagan proved that deficits don’t matter”

168 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:33:15pm

re: #160 FQ Kafir

re: #155 Obdicut

That worked out real well with Spain.

Spain definitely didn’t do the best implementation. However, in many other European countries, it’s worked out very well. Is there any reason you cant’ acknowledge the success of such programs, but need to only focus on failures?

And again, a question you dodged: are you unaware most US debt is bought by those in the US?

169 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:33:33pm

re: #149 Sergey Romanov

And these are ads in his frontpage:

This is the guy to whom GoV _still links_.

And here’s paean to Hitler.

[Link: caesartort.blogspot.com…]

My awakening to the realities of the Jewish Question (JQ) was such that I am no longer on speaking terms with some conservative bloggers who are willfully blind to acknowledge that such JQ does indeed exist. The paradigm shift was so cataclysmic that in those February days I did not dare to tell the whole story of what was going on in my mind. Now that I have purchased some books and read what is perhaps the best on the JQ, Kevin MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique, I must confess a soliloquy I had in my private diaries. On my copy of Mein Kampf, on 27 February 2010 I wrote:
After the lightning bolt that pissed off Taksei so much, I realized that—oh irony of ironies!—Hitler was right about his “anti-Semitism” (though I still believe he was wrong about accepting the genocide of Jews in 1942). The irony is that in a very recent post [now removed from this blog] I say exactly the opposite, that anti-Semitism is wrong. Now I must settle the score with Hitler. Let’s see how much I can stand reading this book…

Same names, same faces. This guy was converted to Hitlerism by “academician” Doktor MacDonald.

170 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:34:14pm

re: #169 Sergey Romanov

How can Gates of Vienna still pretend to be pro-Jewish when linking to a holocaust denier antisemite?

Maybe they’re just tired and don’t give a shit.

171 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:34:18pm

re: #148 FQ Kafir

Wow. Can any of you visualize a way to pay all of this money back?
This guy has his hands full just visualizing the money itself.
[Link: usdebt.kleptocracy.us…]

Yes, if we can get growth back to a reasonable level along with revenue increases and more efficient government we might pay it off in 15 or 20 years. You know, like a home mortgage thingy.

172 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:34:41pm

re: #160 FQ Kafir

Except they don’t have nearly the safety net, and have a far lower tax rate than necessary.

Go to Norway and Sweden to see how it is done properly, you dittohead gasbag.

173 Kronocide  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:35:46pm

re: #160 FQ Kafir

re: #155 Obdicut

That worked out real well with Spain.

YOU WIN INTERNETS IN $TRILLION$ DOLLAR QUESTION!

174 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:36:22pm

re: #172 ProLifeLiberal

I don’t think you can compare the US to Norway, Sweden, China etc.

The mere fact that we are a melting pot and have a vast array of cultures means, at least to me, that we will never have the one national viewpoint of these countries.

A blessing, and a curse.

175 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:36:40pm

re: #160 FQ Kafir

re: #155 Obdicut

That worked out real well with Spain.

And The Netherlands. Lotta wind farms here in Washington are manufactured by the Dutch, because they are leaps and bounds ahead of the U.S. in the technology.

176 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:37:10pm

re: #170 Obdicut

How can Gates of Vienna still pretend to be pro-Jewish when linking to a holocaust denier antisemite?

Maybe they’re just tired and don’t give a shit.

Before Charles called them out they could have excused themselves by noting that they only link to his old blog, and that he started writing this antisemitic stuff only recently. That wouldn’t really pass the muster since last postings on the old blog are antisemitic as hell. But after LGF’s call-out (which, I’m sure, they have read) they don’t even have this excuse.

177 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:37:17pm

re: #174 brownbagj

I don’t think you can compare the US to Norway, Sweden, China etc.

The mere fact that we are a melting pot and have a vast array of cultures means, at least to me, that we will never have the one national viewpoint of these countries.

A blessing, and a curse.

Having been to China, I can say this is a very false perception.

178 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:37:46pm

re: #177 Spocomptonite

I have too. What is false - they are no melting pot.

179 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:38:10pm

re: #174 brownbagj

I don’t think you can compare the US to Norway, Sweden, China etc.

The mere fact that we are a melting pot and have a vast array of cultures means, at least to me, that we will never have the one national viewpoint of these countries.

A blessing, and a curse.

I don’t think the diversity of cultures has any bearing on what tax structure makes the most sense.

180 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:38:26pm

re: #153 Gus 802

NATO was created for the Cold War. Time to pull out.

Next.

Right, whatever comes next, it’s everyone for themselves. Don’t count on the US anymore, we’re broke and screwing ourselves./

181 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:38:52pm

re: #169 Sergey Romanov

And here’s paean to Hitler.

[Link: caesartort.blogspot.com…]

Same names, same faces. This guy was converted to Hitlerism by “academician” Doktor MacDonald.

oh wow:

Kevin B. MacDonald (born January 24, 1944) is a professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach, best known for his use of evolutionary psychology to inform his study of Judaism as being a “group evolutionary strategy.”

MacDonald’s most controversial claim is that a suite of traits that he attributes to Jews, including higher-than-average verbal intelligence and ethnocentricism, have eugenically evolved to enhance the ability of Jews to conspire to out-compete non-Jews for resources while undermining the power and self-confidence of the white majorities in Europe and America whom he insists Jews seek to disposess

182 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:39:25pm

re: #173 BigPapa

YOU WIN INTERNETS IN $TRILLION$ DOLLAR QUESTION!

Hey, I just received that in an email!! Joy joy.

183 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:40:28pm

re: #179 Fozzie Bear

I actually think it might. Of course, this is pure bullshitting on my part admittedly, but it is much harder to agree to what levels of safety nets, taxes to pay for them etc if a society has multiple cultures, backgrounds etc.

Our national identity is that we have no national identity (at least in my mind - a nation of immigrants so to speak).

Our differences make us stronger, but it can also hinder us as well.

184 kirkspencer  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:40:43pm

re: #148 FQ Kafir

Wow. Can any of you visualize a way to pay all of this money back?
This guy has his hands full just visualizing the money itself.
[Link: usdebt.kleptocracy.us…]

Your brain hurts when it plays with big numbers? Sadly, that’s not uncommon. There are some convenient tricks to cope, however.

Let’s say US GDP is 100 Bills. (one bill is, then, about $14T.) That is, we the nation earns 100 Bills per year.

The US public debt is roughly 100 Bills. It’s on a roughly 20 year payoff plan at an interest rate of around 2%. The monthly payment due is about 0.5 Bills, or about 6 Bills per year.

Yep, that’s a heckuva payment - we should all be oh so concerned. (/sarcasm)

185 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:40:51pm

re: #181 000G

I first started paying attention when I learned that he was David Irving’s witness at the 2000 trial (though he claimed then that he did not doubt the Holocaust). It was all downhill since then.

186 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:41:14pm

You can’t have your cake and eat it too. If we want to have bullet trains, free college educations, real healthcare for all Americans, feed and house the poor, space exploration, a solvent Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid we can’t do so by being liberals and PNAC-Neocons (ooga booga) at the same time. Something has to give and this obsession with being the world’s policeman has to come to an end or at least be severely curbed.

The USA spends nearly half (43 percent) of the world’s GDP on defense spending. That’s not the way a real globalist thinks.

Global Distribution of World’s Military

187 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:42:11pm

re: #170 Obdicut

Obdi, note this:

It was the same copy of Mein Kampf that I had started to read in 1996, when I was a staunch philo-Semite. In 1996 I was living in Houston and annotated that copy with many longhand footnotes about Hitler’s purported “paranoia” on the JQ (as I have said, most of my life I was unaware about what the Jews had done in Russia and in America). The “irony” I referred to above was my realization that, just as I had a lightning experience, young Adolf had experienced something quite similar before my grandma was born. Since in my second reading of Mein Kampf I no longer held that pondering around the JQ was by itself paranoia, the experience was like leafing through the book for the first time in my life.

That’s what I was talking about when Alex Jones was being discussed and I wrote that I was surprised why he didn’t go all antisemitic. This is such a natural progression.

188 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:42:30pm

re: #186 Gus 802

But, if we pull out, can we trust Europe to not spiral out of control, forcing us back in to then not only spend money, but hundreds of thousands of lives?

189 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:42:47pm

we had government that represented wealthy interests a hundred years ago - cartoonists at that time joked about “the senator from standard oil, the senator from the northern securities”, etc

and we have government that represents wealthy interests now

the only difference is…


okay, there is no difference

190 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:42:50pm

re: #106 FQ Kafir

Great interactive graph from the Minneapolis Fed showing how well this administration has handled our fiscal matters.

[Link: www.theatlantic.com…]

When will reasonable people on the left start to admit that Obama’s policies aren’t working? Maybe even hurting?

Earlier today, I cooked and ate a frozen vegetable spring roll that I knew was likely to cause indigestion. I’m now on my 4th hour of spring roll-flavored horror burps, with no end in sight.
I blame libs, libtards, liberals, the left, lefties, and socialis{m,ts}.

P.S.: n0bama

191 kirkspencer  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:42:57pm

re: #184 kirkspencer

Your brain hurts when it plays with big numbers? Sadly, that’s not uncommon. There are some convenient tricks to cope, however.

Let’s say US GDP is 100 Bills. (one bill is, then, about $14T.) That is, we the nation earns 100 Bills per year.

The US public debt is roughly 100 Bills. It’s on a roughly 20 year payoff plan at an interest rate of around 2%. The monthly payment due is about 0.5 Bills, or about 6 Bills per year.

Yep, that’s a heckuva payment - we should all be oh so concerned. (/sarcasm)

PMF. 1 Bill is 0.14T, or $140B. the rest works.

192 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:42:57pm

re: #178 brownbagj

I have too. What is false - they are no melting pot.

really? Just because they draconianly don’t embrace it doesn’t mean that they don’t have multiple cultures. Let’s see, there’s the Uyghar, Manchurian, Tibetan, South Chinese… there’s even differences between the coastal regions, inland regions, and river regions. Not to mention the surprisingly high levels of immigration in the major cities. And that’s just what I learned in a week.

193 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:42:57pm

re: #186 Gus 802

We were warned…

194 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:44:03pm

re: #192 Spocomptonite

Yes, really. Dissent is not allowed - or maybe you are forgetting that. Also, the personal value of individualism is not existent.

Really?

195 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:44:04pm

re: #188 brownbagj

But, if we pull out, can we trust Europe to not spiral out of control, forcing us back in to then not only spend money, but hundreds of thousands of lives?

Right. What will those Godless atheists and Muslims do! The Soviet will invade if we let them fend for themselves.

No, wait, there is not more Soviet Union…

OK, better find a new enemy! Time to call 1-800-PNAC 4YOU!

//

196 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:45:32pm

re: #186 Gus 802

Hey, Gus, I think you may have gotten it wrong. It doesn’t say 43% of global GDP. There’s just no way we spend that much annually.

197 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:45:35pm

re: #195 Gus 802

I see what you did there. But I thought part of our presence over in multiple countries in Europe was “preventative.”

Honestly asking. But it seems when we were much more isolationist, lots of people died.

198 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:46:20pm

re: #193 Kid A

We were warned…

[Video]

There is no military-industrial complex! That’s a lie and Eisenhower was a COMMIE!!11ty

199 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:47:22pm

re: #196 Kid A

43% of the money that the world spends on the military is probably what he meant.

200 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:47:34pm

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

201 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:47:47pm

re: #197 brownbagj

I see what you did there. But I thought part of our presence over in multiple countries in Europe was “preventative.”

Honestly asking. But it seems when we were much more isolationist, lots of people died.

It’s not 1939 anymore. Neither is it 1946. It’s over. We can always respond with our current defense structure.

202 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:48:01pm

re: #198 Gus 802

Funny thing is that this was coming from a former general, not some hippie dove.

203 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:48:24pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

“We have no money”, said while we have the lowest tax rates in 30-90 years depending on tax bracket.

204 Kronocide  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:48:55pm

‘Fact check Aisle 200’

205 blueraven  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:06pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

Talking point. Lets see proof. Reagan raised taxes, Clinton raised taxes. We did OK then.

206 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:24pm

re: #201 Gus 802

I would agree with you for the most part. Just thinking out loud as to what the possible consequences might be.

I also get sick of those countries who complain about our bases, but the second we mention closing a base and bringing our men and women home, all hell breaks loose.

207 jaunte  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:38pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.


In the five years after a $241 billion tax increase in 1993, which Republicans criticized as the largest ever, the U.S. economy created more than 15 million jobs and grew at an average annual rate of 3.8 percent. [Link: www.bloomberg.com…]
208 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:42pm

brb lunch

209 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:50pm

re: #187 Sergey Romanov

Obdi, note this:

That’s what I was talking about when Alex Jones was being discussed and I wrote that I was surprised why he didn’t go all antisemitic. This is such a natural progression.

It is a progression. I wouldn’t call it natural. I know a couple of philosemites who managed to not become antisemites. Same with left-right conversations (wasn’t Breitbart allegedly a leftie in his tweens?). Sometimes it happens and then reveals something having gone on underneath the shallow surface and sometimes it doesn’t.

210 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:50pm

re: #203 Spocomptonite

How much did the Obama administration spend? Yeah.

211 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:50pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

That’s utter rubbish. More demand = more hiring.

212 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:49:50pm

re: #196 Kid A

Hey, Gus, I think you may have gotten it wrong. It doesn’t say 43% of global GDP. There’s just no way we spend that much annually.

Oh. I think it mean 43 percent of world military spending then. Anyway. That still works.

213 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:50:02pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

Pleas, explain to me, how people who make a million dollar a year create jobs with that million dollars a year, and how raising taxes rates 1-5% will jeopardize their creation of said jobs?

214 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:50:10pm

re: #188 brownbagj

But, if we pull out, can we trust Europe to not spiral out of control, forcing us back in to then not only spend money, but hundreds of thousands of lives?

I think at some point we have to acknowledge that we can either stand together as a nation, or fall apart as an empire.

The empire thing isn’t working out so well, especially considering that we aren’t collecting any tribute from our various satellites. It’s breaking us financially.

It’s time to pull out, in my opinion, and I realize the consequences may be ugly for the rest of the world. The consequences would be even uglier if we crumble as a nation.

We are overextended. We need to either raise a lot more revenue, or reduce our commitments overseas. (Really, we need to do both, imo.)

What is the goal over there? What are the terms of success? I don’t think we ever bothered defining them, and that lack of clarity of mission has fucked us. It’s time to get out.

215 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:50:25pm

re: #209 000G

conversations

That’s “conversions”.

216 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:50:32pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

Strange, raising taxes didn’t cause an issue under Clinton.

Read up, you moron.

re: #186 Gus 802

Considering the countries we will/would be policing, we can slash military. Alot.

217 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:50:49pm

re: #209 000G

Uh, did you seriously consider I wrote it about philosemites? *eyeroll*

218 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:50:54pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

Show us the data buddy. Taxes are now lower than they have ever been. How’s that working out for you and your religion?

219 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:50:55pm

re: #213 Spocomptonite

Because businesses are taxed at the same rate.

220 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:51:18pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

Your Greek analogy doesn’t work at all. One of the reasons that Greece is in trouble is because they weren’t collecting taxes while people still raked in the benefits.

221 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:51:26pm

re: #204 BigPapa

‘Fact check Aisle 200’

Don’t bother. It’s a waste of time. He’s just spewing talking points.

222 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:51:28pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

We don’t have any peas, dude. We ate them already.

223 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:51:36pm

re: #210 FQ Kafir

A whole lot less than Bush, that’s for sure.

224 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:51:37pm

re: #218 Naso Tang

Uncertainty about Obamacare is one example.

225 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:51:45pm

re: #214 Fozzie Bear

I agree.

And I would go so far that once these countries has to start spending money on military themselves, they will find it very hard to pay for all of the social safety nets and self preservation as well.

We, the American taxpayer, subsidize a lot around the world.

226 RadicalModerate  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:51:59pm

re: #210 FQ Kafir

How much did the Obama administration spend? Yeah.

To stave off complete economic collapse?

Not nearly enough.
(and BTW, most of that money was allocated in 2008 - prior to Obama taking office).

227 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:52:23pm

re: #224 FQ Kafir

What do you propose for people like me, you ignorant gasbag?

228 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:52:30pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

how come this has never happened in practice?

how can people still try to sell this bullshit when it has NEVER HAPPENED IN REALITY?

229 Dark_Falcon  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:52:40pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

We could hardly turn into Greece at all, since Greece has revenue collection problems we don’t have for cultural reasons.

230 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:52:48pm

re: #210 FQ Kafir

How much did the Obama administration spend? Yeah.

WTF? He’s been trying to raise taxes to close the gap ever since he came into office!!! ARG your blatantly obvious talking point annoy me! How can you not see this elephant in the room?!?!

231 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:53:01pm

re: #213 Spocomptonite

Pleas, explain to me, how people who make a million dollar a year create jobs with that million dollars a year, and how raising taxes rates 1-5% will jeopardize their creation of said jobs?

It’s a religious thing. You know, faith. Perhaps he will quote a TP prophet as proof, but don’t hold your breath.

232 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:53:04pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

Why are you ignoring the actual history of what happened following the Bush tax cuts in order to make this argument?

Why are you ignoring how we got out of the great depression?

Why are you ignoring what’s actually happening in the states right now?

233 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:53:31pm

I guess y’all have it pretty much figured out.

Rest assured, what happened last November was no fluke. America wants to reign in the crazy spending.

234 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:53:42pm

re: #219 FQ Kafir

Because businesses are taxed at the same rate.

your answer has been marked INCORRECT

235 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:54:25pm

re: #233 FQ Kafir

I guess y’all have it pretty much figured out.

Rest assured, what happened last November was no fluke. America wants to reign in the crazy spending.

Which is why Obama is going to be a two-termer.

236 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:54:27pm

re: #233 FQ Kafir

You mean the massive spending of Reagan, Bush, and Bush II?

237 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:54:31pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.

Why do you believe this to be true? Just asserting it as an a priori truth doesn’t make it valid.

238 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:00pm

re: #233 FQ Kafir

I guess y’all have it pretty much figured out.

Rest assured, what happened last November was no fluke. America wants to reign in the crazy spending.

rest assured, what happened in 1992, 1994, 2006 and 2008 was no fluke. america is not a country of ignorant sociopaths

239 blueraven  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:15pm

re: #210 FQ Kafir

How much did the Obama administration spend? Yeah.

Not really all that much in the scheme of things. But the decline in revenues and necessary spending to prop up the economy did result in a deficit. However, much of that is structural. Obama’s stimulus spending will end. Bush tax cut spending and unpaid for wars will not.

240 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:18pm

re: #224 FQ Kafir

Uncertainty about Obamacare is one example.

Good lord, dude, do you work for Michele Bachmann? I’m no fan of Obama’s health care plan because he could’ve done it in a better way, and I think it’s an overreach, but the reason no one is hiring right now is because there is no demand. When your economy is 70% driven by consumer spending and they are not spending, everything will remain - at best - flat. This is not Obama’s fault. It’s been brewing for decades, Obama inherited it. Wake the fuck up.

241 jaunte  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:26pm

U.S. Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes With Global Odyssey

U.S. companies amassed at least $1 trillion in foreign profits not taxed in the U.S. as of the end of last year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That cumulative total, based on filings by 135 companies, increased 70 percent over three years, from $590 billion in 2006.

While some of the offshore earnings reflect sales abroad, much of the growth results from expanding use of transfer pricing, said Martin Sullivan, a tax economist who formerly worked for the Treasury Department and Arthur Andersen LLP.

242 Sol Berdinowitz  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:30pm

re: #142 Naso Tang

How many times do people like you need to be reminded that Bush was handed a surplus?

I remember Rush Limbaugh pointing out back under Clinton that a surplus simply meant that the government was taking more of our money from us than it needed to operate, which was unfair and immoral…

really.

243 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:41pm

re: #224 FQ Kafir

Uncertainty about Obamacare is one example.

An example of what? You are talking gibberish. The topic was taxes/jobs.

244 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:44pm

re: #228 engineer dog

how can people still try to sell this bullshit when it has NEVER HAPPENED IN REALITY?

Because there’s an entire industry of “conservative” pundits, bloggers and howler monkeys on talk radio and Fox News that have convinced them these things are true.

245 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:49pm

Keynesian remedies are deleterious in the long run. Supply side economics is coming out of hibernation.

246 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:55:54pm

BTW… I like peas. Always liked peas. Who doesn’t like peas? How’s that a metaphor?

Couldn’t he have used Brussels Sprouts as the analogy?

247 EB71  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:56:27pm

re: #214 Fozzie Bear

The empire thing isn’t working out so well, especially considering that we aren’t collecting any tribute from our various satellites. It’s breaking us financially.

Hmm, that would be one way to raise revenue that doesn’t involve tax increases. ;-)

248 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:56:33pm

re: #219 FQ Kafir

Because businesses are taxed at the same rate.

You are conflating small privately owned businesses with corporations. This is a textbook neoliberal dodge.

The corporate tax rate isn’t the same as individual taxes. It just isn’t, no matter how many times you say it.

249 Dark_Falcon  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:56:36pm

re: #233 FQ Kafir

I guess y’all have it pretty much figured out.

Rest assured, what happened last November was no fluke. America wants to reign in the crazy spending.

Yes, but not in an insane way. “Strategic Default” (to use Donald Trump’s term for it) is not a good way forward. Mitch McConnell is right to cut a deal, since that really is the best option. But that does mean conceding some things and that should be, within limits, accepted. Because as you said, Election Matter. And Obama was elected president, which gives him the power to demand and get some of what he wants.

250 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:57:08pm

re: #233 FQ Kafir

I guess y’all have it pretty much figured out.

Rest assured, what happened last November was no fluke. America wants to reign REIN in the crazy spending.

You and Drunken Pam have the same spelling issues.

251 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:57:14pm

re: #221 Killgore Trout

Don’t bother. It’s a waste of time. He’s just spewing talking points.

..in random order.

252 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:57:17pm

re: #238 engineer dog

rest assured, what happened in 1992, 1994, 2006 and 2008 was no fluke. america is not a country of ignorant sociopaths

I wouldn’t be so sure about that. Look at what happened in 2010.

253 Dark_Falcon  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:57:29pm

BBL

254 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:57:39pm

re: #245 FQ Kafir

Keynesian remedies are deleterious in the long run. Supply side economics is coming out of hibernation.

So is trolling, apparently.

Not worth the time.

255 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:57:46pm

re: #245 FQ Kafir

Keynesian remedies are deleterious in the long run. Supply side economics is coming out of hibernation.

I think you are the winner for parading the most blatantly and empirically wrong talking points in a single thread.

Congratulations!

(This means you can stop now)

256 Fozzie Bear  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:58:01pm

re: #245 FQ Kafir

Keynesian remedies are deleterious in the long run. Supply side economics is coming out of hibernation.

OMG you are an idiot.

257 chandsolo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:58:10pm

Successful troll is successful? FQ is just a taking point dispenser. Nothing you say will change its mind because it doesn’t have one. It has been spoon fed all it needs to know and its builders are pleased.

As an aside, FQ if you really do only make 25K, I pity you, because you truly are your own worse enemy.

258 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:58:19pm

re: #246 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

BTW… I like peas. Always liked peas. Who doesn’t like peas? How’s that a metaphor?

Couldn’t he have used Brussels Sprouts as the analogy?

I like brussel sprouts!

259 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:58:22pm

In my opinion, taxes that are too low cause a problem and taxes that are too high cause a problem.

We are talking single digit percentage points here - surely to G_d or the FSM there is a way to compromise.

Ultimately, both parties have shown a propensity to spend. IF there are any increases in revenue, I would like it applied to debt only, not new programs or increased spending on current programs.

260 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:58:34pm

re: #211 Kid A

That’s utter rubbish. More demand = more hiring.

yes, exactly

besides the fact that republicans routinely seek to confuse personal taxes with business taxes, businesses would never see any reason to hire more people just because they got a tax break

the first responsibility of the people running a corporation - by law! - is to maximize profit

they hire people, reluctantly, if they think that’s what they have to do to make more money

it’s sad that these self appointed economic experts in the teabag faction are so ignorant of basic business practice

261 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:58:48pm

re: #254 Obdicut

So is trolling, apparently.

Not worth the time.

Does he qualify?
Image: troll.jpg

262 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:58:52pm

re: #245 FQ Kafir

Here’s a book for you. It might help:

[Link: www.amazon.com…]

Now let the adults talk. You’re not contributing anything but talking points.

263 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:59:00pm

re: #254 Obdicut

Someone ban the “FQ Kafir” fucker. He is driving up a wall with rage and everything else.

His lack of compassion astounds me.

264 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:59:29pm

re: #245 FQ Kafir

Keynesian remedies are deleterious in the long run. Supply side economics is coming out of hibernation.

Supply side? You mean like the “supply side” banks that would have gone belly up had it not been for TARP? Or do you mean the America automobile industry (who still build ugly crappy cars) which would have gone belly up had it not been for the Feds? Or the oil companies that rely on tax breaks, the BLM and Department of Interior giving them head, and the US Navy providing them the finest security in the world? On oil platforms no less.

That “supply side”?

265 jaunte  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:00:12pm

re: #264 Gus 802

It has electrolytes!

266 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:00:16pm

re: #246 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Couldn’t he have used Brussels Sprouts as the analogy?

Dude, you gotta roast them. Sprouts, carrots and taters. Salt, pepper toss with olive oil and balsamic vinegar.

267 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:00:38pm

re: #263 ProLifeLiberal

Just ignore him. No need rage on a message board. Don’t let him/her get to you.

268 Sol Berdinowitz  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:00:49pm

re: #200 FQ Kafir

More than half of Europe is implementing austerity programs due to profligate spending. It truly is time to “eat our peas,” before we turn into Greece.

We have no money. Raising taxes depresses the job market.

Lower or stable taxes=more hiring, the opposite is also true.


We are Greece, in fact, our per capta debt is higher than Greece, they just don’t have the option of redlating their currency or going father in debt because of restriction placed on them by the EU.

269 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:00:50pm

re: #255 Spocomptonite

Hair of the dog = Keynes

Eat your peas = supply side

270 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:00:58pm

re: #245 FQ Kafir

Keynesian remedies are deleterious in the long run. Supply side economics is coming out of hibernation.

supply side economics is, obviously, nothing more than a form of keynesianism

try reading up on it so that you can learn why your statement is unintelligible

271 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:01:33pm

re: #269 FQ Kafir

Hair of the dog = Keynes

Eat your peas = supply side

What in God’s name does that mean??!! Good grief…

272 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:01:55pm

re: #209 000G

Not that I think a clarification is necessary, but since you somehow mistook what I wrote for the most absurd thing possible: I was talking about paranoid conservatives who don’t start out as antisemitic, and may even consider themselves philosemitic. But since there are no clear rules once paranoia sets in, it is only natural (although not necessary) for them to latch onto some sort of a Jewish conspiracy theory from alleged historical examples (often false).

273 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:02:02pm

re: #269 FQ Kafir

Hair of the dog = Keynes

Eat your peas = supply side

once more, get on the intertubes and learn something instead of showing what a propoganda victim you are

sorry to be harsh, but get with it please

274 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:02:17pm

re: #270 engineer dog

Seriously. Words have meanings. Knowing them is useful when talking.

275 blueraven  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:02:52pm

re: #263 ProLifeLiberal

Someone ban the “FQ Kafir” fucker. He is driving up a wall with rage and everything else.

His lack of compassion astounds me.

Its not his lack of compassion, that is a given. It is his lack of any facts in evidence.

276 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:03:53pm

re: #267 brownbagj

I know. My circumstances make it hard. He is tryinig to make life miserable for people with disabilities like me.

277 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:04:13pm

re: #269 FQ Kafir

Hair of the dog = Keynes

Eat your peas = supply side

Image: There_has_been_a_falire_on_the_INTERNETS.jpg

278 RadicalModerate  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:04:15pm

re: #245 FQ Kafir

Keynesian remedies are deleterious in the long run. Supply side economics is coming out of hibernation.

Yeah, some of us are old enough to remember the credit-card economy of the 1980s - where the national debt TRIPLED under Saint Reagan’s watch. And nearly crashed in 1989 - with a serious recession that lasted until 1993. But hey, let’s not let facts get in the way of political grandstanding.

279 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:04:18pm

re: #269 FQ Kafir

Hair of the dog = Keynes

Eat your peas = supply side

Let’s see Boeing survive without Keynes economics. The truth of the matter is that it’s a mixed economy combing Keynes and supply side features. But the largest corporations in this country thrive on Federal government contracts. General Electric being another one after Boeing.

280 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:04:21pm

re: #260 engineer dog

yes, exactly

besides the fact that republicans routinely seek to confuse personal taxes with business taxes, businesses would never see any reason to hire more people just because they got a tax break

the first responsibility of the people running a corporation - by law! - is to maximize profit

they hire people, reluctantly, if they think that’s what they have to do to make more money

it’s sad that these self appointed economic experts in the teabag faction are so ignorant of basic business practice

True, although there can be a case for targeted tax breaks (sometimes in the form of subsidies).

281 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:04:33pm

re: #275 blueraven

That the sort of points I miss when I go into “Argle Fargle Blargle” Mode.

282 Sol Berdinowitz  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:05:07pm

re: #279 Gus 802

Let’s see Boeing survive without Keynes economics. The truth of the matter is that it’s a mixed economy combing Keynes and supply side features. But the largest corporations in this country thrive on Federal government contracts. General Electric being another one after Boeing.

And Halliburton, one of the biggest government contractors, has moved its headquarters overseas.

283 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:05:31pm

I’m watching a documentary on the Ray “Boom Boom” Mancini/Duk Koo Kim fight from 1982 when Kim died of injuries sustained in the fight.

I watched that fight live on TV that day. Best fight I ever saw (or since) and the most tragic thing I’ve ever seen in sports.

284 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:06:08pm

Supply side with no-bid contract for Haliburton and XE! Coming up next. For-profit supply side wars being fought with private armies. Talk about pigs at the trough. You should see how the corporations feed off the Pentagon feeding station. Yeah. Supply side.

285 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:06:17pm

re: #283 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

I’m watching a documentary on the Ray “Boom Boom” Mancini/Duk Koo Kim fight from 1982 when Kim died of injuries sustained in the fight.

I watched that fight live on TV that day. Best fight I ever saw (or since) and the most tragic thing I’ve ever seen in sports.

And people think MMA is better. My ass it is.

286 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:06:19pm

re: #263 ProLifeLiberal

Someone ban the “FQ Kafir” fucker. He is driving up a wall with rage and everything else.

His lack of compassion astounds me.

That would be bad. Here, what I do is put *SQUAWK* before and after every sentence. Now, how can you get mad at at this?

287 justaminute  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:06:22pm

Maybe the Republicans have gone so extreme that their want to see if the President will use the 14th and they try to impeach him. I think they are that far gone.

288 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:06:55pm

re: #282 ralphieboy

And Halliburton, one of the biggest government contractors, has moved its headquarters overseas.

Slime bags that they are.

289 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:06:58pm

re: #287 justaminute

Maybe the Republicans have gone so extreme that their want to see if the President will use the 14th and they try to impeach him. I think they are that far gone.

Whatever it takes!

290 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:07:25pm

re: #280 Naso Tang

True, although there can be a case for targeted tax breaks (sometimes in the form of subsidies).

yes, if there is a logical connection such as encouraging one behavior over the other by making it cheaper, all other things being more or less equal

but simply insisting that tax cuts on individuals will make jobs occur is nonsensical

291 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:07:42pm

“Yeah, how much for washing this bag of laundry?”

“That’ll be 100 bucks.”

Supply side magic!

292 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:07:52pm

From Wikipedia:

Supply-side economics is a school of macroeconomic thought that argues that economic growth can be most effectively created by lowering barriers for people to produce (supply) goods and services, such as adjusting income tax and capital gains tax rates, and by allowing greater flexibility by reducing regulation. Consumers will then benefit from a greater supply of goods and services at lower prices.

293 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:08:28pm

re: #286 Spocomptonite

Rage? Where?

294 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:08:37pm

re: #292 FQ Kafir

From Wikipedia:

The fact that you quoted that from Wikipedia speaks volumes about what an ignoramus you are.

295 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:09:13pm

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer’s brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer’s brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

296 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:09:19pm

re: #217 Sergey Romanov

Uh, did you seriously consider I wrote it about philosemites? *eyeroll*

Why else bold it?

297 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:09:36pm

re: #294 Kid A

Charles has quoted from Wikipedia dozens of times. Heh.

298 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:10:04pm

re: #282 ralphieboy

And Halliburton, one of the biggest government contractors, has moved its headquarters overseas.

Well, fuck. I would have moved out too.

Not like the American people liked them. I’d like to have a hundred bucks for every “HALLIBURTON! CHENEY! WAR FOR OIL!” type of line I heard.

I would’ve moved my company’s operations, shooting the finger over my shoulder as I left.

299 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:10:44pm

re: #297 FQ Kafir

Why do you think trolling is a good way of getting your point across?

Or is it really just for your own enjoyment that you’re saying easily disproved bullshit about economics?

300 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:11:04pm

re: #296 000G

Why else bold it?

You must think I’m some sort of a idiot if you seriously thought I meant what you ascribed to me.

*disappointed*

Also, see a clarification above, personally for you.

301 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:11:30pm

re: #285 Kid A

Was the most stunning display of athleticism I had ever seen.

302 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:11:41pm

re: #297 FQ Kafir

Charles has quoted from Wikipedia dozens of times. Heh.

From the page you quoted you left this out:

Current supply-side economics is primarily concerned with economic growth in general, and does not hold that decreasing taxes increases government revenue. It is true that many early proponents argued that the size of the economic growth would be significant enough that the increased government revenue from a faster growing economy would be sufficient to compensate completely for the short-term costs of a tax cut, and that tax cuts could, in fact, cause overall revenue to increase.[2] A 2003 piece on page A4 of the Wall Street Journal commented on a Congressional Budget Office report which concluded that taxes cannot be reduced without losing revenue, and declared the debate “ended”,.[3] Economists remain divided concerning the conditions necessary to effect a revenue increase while cutting rate.

303 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:12:05pm

re: #296 000G

Hadn’t read #272. Mea culpa.

304 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:12:12pm

re: #292 FQ Kafir

From Wikipedia:

Supply-side economics is a school of macroeconomic thought that argues that economic growth can be most effectively created by lowering barriers for people to produce (supply) goods and services, such as adjusting income tax and capital gains tax rates, and by allowing greater flexibility by reducing regulation. Consumers will then benefit from a greater supply of goods and services at lower prices.

And you TPers have taken that to it’s incoherently logical conclusion that no taxes and no regulations (except on unions, infrastructure, rural airports, gays, women and religious symbolism) will result in heaven on earth.

305 recusancy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:12:46pm

re: #55 RadicalModerate

I’ve always meant to ask, what is the genesis of your username? It sounds a lot like a racist epithet used in S. Africa.

(fyi: “Kaffir”, sometimes spelled as “kafir” is the African equivalent of the N-word used in the United States)

[Link: en.wikipedia.org…]

I think it’s more a label for “rejection of islam”. There’s quite a few nic’s here with “kafir” in the name. This was an anti islam / jihad watch / whatever you want to call it blog at one point.

306 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:12:53pm

re: #298 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Well, fuck. I would have moved out too.

Not like the American people liked them. I’d like to have a hundred bucks for every “HALLIBURTON! CHENEY! WAR FOR OIL!” type of line I heard.

I would’ve moved my company’s operations, shooting the finger over my shoulder as I left.

Well. It would have helped if Haliburton wasn’t run by a bunch of pricks assholes and had to take part in competitive bidding. It’s a fricking monopoly that hid behind the mask of “national security”.

307 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:13:08pm

re: #300 Sergey Romanov

You must think I’m some sort of a idiot if you seriously thought I meant what you ascribed to me.

I know a couple of rather intelligent people who think that philosemitism and antisemitism are two sides of the same coin. I happen to disagree, but I don’t think it’s an outright idiotic position.

308 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:13:25pm

re: #294 Kid A

The fact that you quoted that from Wikipedia speaks volumes about what an ignoramus you are.

Too funny!

309 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:13:36pm

And there’s this:

Today, supply-side economics is viewed by critics as a form of “trickle-down economics”.[5]

310 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:14:14pm

re: #308 FQ Kafir

Too funny!

Read 302, genius.

311 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:14:34pm

re: #303 000G

Hadn’t read #272. Mea culpa.

*fumes*

Thou art forgiven!

;)

312 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:14:47pm

re: #310 Kid A

I did… That’s why it’s funny!

313 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:14:52pm

re: #305 recusancy

I don’t think we were ever anti-Islam. Have been and still are anti-idiotarian which includes jihadists among many others.

Charles forced out the anti-Islam creeps who tried to hop on this train and fights them to this day.

314 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:15:01pm

re: #305 recusancy

I think it’s more a label for “rejection of islam”. There’s quite a few nic’s here with “kafir” in the name. This was an anti islam / jihad watch / whatever you want to call it blog at one point.

Like Cracker here in the south. An endearment when used by one side an insult when used by the other, and with the added benefit that it has only one spelling (inside joke).

315 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:15:20pm

re: #312 FQ Kafir

I did… That’s why it’s funny!

You also conveniently left out a lot of these:

This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

316 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:15:43pm

re: #310 Kid A

Read 302, genius.

I’m fairly sure he’s just trolling, he knows his arguments are weak, he knows his views on the economy are baloney.

317 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:15:55pm

i have a question for republicans:

where do they find the evidence they are not completely alienating the american electorate by their behavior since jan 2011?

318 Spocomptonite  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:16:13pm

re: #315 Kid A

You also conveniently left out a lot of these:

My favorite part is where two of the biggest proponents have no economic background at all.

319 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:16:30pm

re: #317 engineer dog

i have a question for republicans:

where do they find the evidence they are not completely alienating the american electorate by their behavior since jan 2011?

Talk radio?

320 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:16:56pm

re: #316 Obdicut

Yet who are the ones doing the name-calling? Real logic ya got there. Hope it works for ya.

321 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:17:37pm

re: #306 Gus 802

No business wants to play on a level playing field. A businesses goal is to create an un-level playing field.

They play the game magnificently.

322 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:17:54pm

re: #307 000G

Even on such an assumption it would not follow that progression from philosemitism to antisemitism is natural. Only a braindead would make such an argument. OK, let’s forget about it.

323 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:18:27pm

re: #320 FQ Kafir

Yet who are the ones doing the name-calling? Real logic ya got there. Hope it works for ya.

Calling you a troll is not name-calling. It’s a statement of fact, unlike your contributions to this thread.

324 Obdicut  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:18:55pm

re: #320 FQ Kafir

Yet who are the ones doing the name-calling? Real logic ya got there. Hope it works for ya.

I approached you with quite a few logical arguments— that the Bush tax cuts did not produce greater employment, that, in the current moment, the states spending least are recovering least well, and that we climbed out of the Great Depression by government spending.

You choose not to engage with those, and instead repeat obviously flawed talking points that are shot down within seconds.

325 RadicalModerate  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:19:25pm

re: #305 recusancy

I think it’s more a label for “rejection of islam”. There’s quite a few nic’s here with “kafir” in the name. This was an anti islam / jihad watch / whatever you want to call it blog at one point.

That may be so, but if that were the case, the term “Kufr” would be the more applicable term.

326 FQ Kafir  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:19:31pm

Seems like all of the economic wunderkinds here know all of the answers.

Enjoy your illusion.

327 b_sharp  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:19:40pm

re: #11 Obdicut

What on earth does that have to do with Orwell?

Raising taxes increases revenue. Having them included would be part of a balanced approach.

Orwellian language is language that describes something in a way so as to reverse its true nature. Can you please explain how those phrases do that?

And you know Orwell was a socialist, right?

Mentioning Orwell makes your argument look all sophisticated and deep.

328 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:19:43pm

re: #313 brownbagj

I don’t think we were ever anti-Islam. Have been and still are anti-idiotarian which includes jihadists among many others.

Charles forced out the anti-Islam creeps who tried to hop on this train and fights them to this day.

We were highly critical of Islam, that is a fact. However it was the trend towards a racist perspective that was stopped.

329 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:20:45pm

re: #320 FQ Kafir

Perhaps, if your intent is to try to change minds, might I suggest a different strategy?

The current one is not working. As a speaker and manager, if I try a tactic and it does not work across an entire audience, I change my tactics to achieve my goal.

I guess the question is - what is your goal on this topic?

330 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:21:25pm

re: #292 FQ Kafir

From Wikipedia:

supply side economics is the keynsian theory that government making more cash available to consumers will stimulate the economy, except that it targets richer taxpayers rather than middle class and poor taxpayers

Supply-side economics is a school of macroeconomic thought that argues that economic growth can be most effectively created by lowering barriers for people to produce (supply) goods and services, such as adjusting income tax and capital gains tax rates, and by allowing greater flexibility by reducing regulation. Consumers will then benefit from a greater supply of goods and services at lower prices.

aside from the fact that the expected outcome never occurred, this sentence shows the incoherence of this “definition”:

“economic growth can be most effectively created by lowering barriers for people to produce (supply) goods and services, such as adjusting income tax and capital gains tax rates”

so lowering tax rates on rich individuals is going to make materials and labor cheaper? really?

331 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:21:37pm

re: #320 FQ Kafir

But he’s a great deal nicer to idiot like you than I am.

Go take a junior college course, and learn why these theories of yours are wrong. Assuming you got the intelligence to.

332 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:22:43pm

re: #326 FQ Kafir

Seems like all of the economic wunderkinds here know all of the answers.

Enjoy your illusion.

Speaking of illusions:

Image: laffercurve.gif

333 recusancy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:22:54pm

re: #313 brownbagj

I don’t think we were ever anti-Islam. Have been and still are anti-idiotarian which includes jihadists among many others.

Charles forced out the anti-Islam creeps who tried to hop on this train and fights them to this day.

It was an anti islam blog for a while. It’s not now. No need to white wash history.

334 goddamnedfrank  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:23:19pm

People often stop me on the street and say, “hey frank, you have a really high karma ratio, how can I be more like you?” And you know what? I take the time to tell them, because I’m pretty awesome like that. I say “try not to get into running battles with stupid dumbass trolls, because it’s just not worth it.”

335 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:23:54pm

re: #333 recusancy

Not trying to white wash. I guess I didn’t read as much then as I do now. I thought as soon as the anti-Islam factions reared their heads that the great expulsion took place.

My bad if I am wrong. But no white washing on my part.

336 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:25:05pm

re: #326 FQ Kafir

Whatever.

337 emcesq  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:25:45pm

re: #93 Gus 802

That would be a surprise?

338 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:26:06pm

In my opinion, no “theory” on economics is entirely right or wrong. There are pieces of each that are applicable and the trick is not to be beholden to an ideology but facts as they present themselves.

Economics is as much art as science, if not more. People and shifting attitudes, morals and needs are involved.

Both sides need to be flexible.

339 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:27:19pm

re: #333 recusancy

I’m not sure about that.

Once I quoted Ann Coulter (the REALLY bad thing she said) during a time that someone may have called us “anti-Muslim”. Charles deleted the comment in about two minutes.

LGF is Charles, Charles is not anti-Muslim.

340 ProBosniaLiberal  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:27:29pm

re: #334 goddamnedfrank

I’m gonna leave for a bit to decompress.

341 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:27:37pm

TPM Talking Points Memo
RT @samsteinhp: breaking: Dem leaders are all in pelosi’s office, i’m told. and everyone has signed off on deal. waiting on Boehner.

342 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:29:53pm

re: #338 brownbagj

Both sides need to be flexible.

Flexibility would be a nice luxury if we weren’t facing imminent economic catastrophe due to the rigid ideological demands of the teabagger assholes.

343 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:31:24pm

re: #339 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

LGF was anti-Muslim for a period, and not simply anti-Jihad. It was on board with Pam, Spencer, Fjordman and often featured them - until Charles saw where it all leads and kicked them all out, gradually, for which he has earned thanks from all the normal people, and hatred from all the nuts.

344 chubby vegan  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:31:34pm

Gosh. How long have I been here?

345 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:32:06pm

re: #344 chubby vegan

Gosh. How long have I been here?

Registered since: Oct 9, 2005 at 2:13 pm

346 Sol Berdinowitz  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:34:31pm

I showed up here to have a good argument with the anti-Muslim advocates, but I do not miss them…

347 blueraven  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:34:47pm

zombies

348 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:35:39pm

re: #326 FQ Kafir

Seems like all of the economic wunderkinds here know all of the answers.

Enjoy your illusion.

economy under clinton

economy under bush

QED

[x]

349 Sol Berdinowitz  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:36:46pm

I came here for an argument!

350 recusancy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:37:49pm

re: #326 FQ Kafir

Seems like all of the economic wunderkinds here know all of the answers.

Enjoy your illusion.

I didn’t know economists made less than 25k/year these days. Times are tough.

351 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:37:54pm

So I come back from lunch and miss everything.

I:

/aunt and I found an old printer that we set up, but it specifically needs yellow ink. o_O

352 jaunte  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:38:01pm

Syria: 100 die in crackdown as Assad sends in his tanks

Activists describe massacre in central city of Hama after armoured units break through barricades to crush protests
353 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:38:01pm

re: #349 ralphieboy

I came here for an argument!

[Video]

Yes, you did:

[Link: www.youtube.com…]

354 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:38:34pm

re: #353 Sergey Romanov

Yes, you did:

[Link: www.youtube.com…]

Sorry, wrong link:

355 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:38:45pm

re: #348 engineer dog

I agree with you mostly, but I do not think it is that simple as just comparing presidents.

So many factors go into a successful economy, that any person/persons taking credit do so due to vanity.

Each previous president positively and negatively affects the next president after.

356 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:39:07pm

re: #344 chubby vegan

Gosh. How long have I been here?

So. Do you still think President Obama is an “Arab American”?

357 Sol Berdinowitz  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:39:14pm

Sorry, this is getting hit on the head with hackneyed supply-side talking points!

358 recusancy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:39:37pm

re: #356 Gus 802

So. Do you still think President Obama is an “Arab American”?

And even if he was. Would it matter?

359 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:40:22pm

re: #344 chubby vegan

Gosh. How long have I been here?

How was the coma?

360 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:40:23pm

re: #356 Gus 802

Dude, his “real” birth certificate says sekrit mooslim plant to take over US.

C’mon.

361 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:40:25pm

re: #349 ralphieboy

I came here for an argument!

[Video]

Hey look — it’s a documentary film about the debt limit negotiations.

///

362 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:41:21pm

re: #358 recusancy

And even if he was. Would it matter?

I’m just asking questions.

363 engineer cat  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:41:48pm

re: #355 brownbagj

I agree with you mostly, but I do not think it is that simple as just comparing presidents.

So many factors go into a successful economy, that any person/persons taking credit do so due to vanity.

Each previous president positively and negatively affects the next president after.

i’m sure it’s very complex and imponderable, but at the very least the 90s and the aughts prove that the theory “taxes up, economy down; taxes down, economy up” is incorrect

364 brownbagj  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:42:03pm

Later all. Try to not hate on the TPrs too much.

It ain’t often that the teenagers get the keys to the car.

/

365 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:42:16pm

re: #361 Lidane

Hey look — it’s a documentary film about the debt limit negotiations.

///

Any bets on whether script writers are playing with the idea?

366 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:43:00pm

re: #224 FQ Kafir

Uncertainty about Obamacare is one example.

oh man, my nutbag talking points arrived when I was asleep!

Thanks UPS! What can Brown do for me, indeed!

367 Achilles Tang  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:43:20pm

re: #364 brownbagj

Later all. Try to not hate on the TPrs too much.

It ain’t often that the teenagers get the keys to the car.

/

They took the neighbor’s car.

368 laZardo  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:43:24pm

re: #364 brownbagj

Later all. Try to not hate on the TPrs too much.

It ain’t often that the teenagers get the keys to the car.

/

At least the teenagers learn, the sooner the better. The elderly on the other hand…

/

369 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:43:25pm

re: #362 Gus 802

I’m just asking questions.

That’s a good one. Straight from Limbaugh.

370 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:44:11pm

re: #362 Gus 802

I’m just asking questions.

Isn’t that what that senile old woman said to mcCain?

“he’s uh….he’s an arab.”

371 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:44:54pm

re: #370 WindUpBird

Isn’t that what that senile old woman said to mcCain?

“he’s uh…he’s an arab.”

“No, Ma’am, he is not an Arab, he is a decent man!” *facepalm*

372 chubby vegan  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:45:02pm

re: #345 Kid A

Registered since: Oct 9, 2005 at 2:13 pm

Yeah. Thanks.

373 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:45:17pm

re: #371 Sergey Romanov

“No, Ma’am, he is not an Arab, he is a decent man!” *facepalm*


The comedy writes itself, doesn’t it? :D

374 recusancy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:46:04pm

re: #362 Gus 802

I’m just asking questions.

I know but I feel like when we defend him against that falsehood we’re perpetuating the belief that if he was an Arab it would be bad somehow.

375 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:46:09pm

re: #373 WindUpBird

The comedy writes itself, doesn’t it? :D

Eh, if it was only a comedy. He didn’t even apologize for this gaffe, did he?

376 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:46:55pm

re: #370 WindUpBird

Isn’t that what that senile old woman said to mcCain?

“he’s uh…he’s an arab.”

SNL had some great skits with the McCain lady.

377 recusancy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:46:59pm

re: #371 Sergey Romanov

“No, Ma’am, he is not an Arab, he is a decent man!” *facepalm*

Ya, that’s exactly my point. As if the two are mutually exclusive.

378 Killgore Trout  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:47:10pm

re: #372 chubby vegan


Welcome back.

379 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:47:57pm

re: #374 recusancy

I know but I feel like when we defend him against that falsehood we’re perpetuating the belief that if he was an Arab it would be bad somehow.

Sure. But calling Obama an “Arab American” was also a feeble attempt to smear him circa 2008. It was playing into irrational American fears which exist to this day.

380 recusancy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:47:59pm

re: #374 recusancy

I know but I feel like when we defend him against that falsehood we’re perpetuating the belief that if he was an Arab it would be bad somehow.

Although, I know a few here who believe it would be bad.

381 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:48:31pm

Down the mem’ry lane:

[Link: mediamatters.org…]

LIMBAUGH: These polls on how one-third of blue-collar white Democrats won’t vote for Obama because he’s black, and — but he’s not black. Do you know he has not one shred of African-American blood? He doesn’t have any African — that’s why when they asked whether he was authentic, whether he’s down for the struggle. He’s Arab. You know, he’s from Africa. He’s from Arab parts of Africa. He’s not — his father was — he’s not African-American. The last thing that he is is African-American. I guess that’s splitting hairs, I don’t — it’s just all these little things, everything seems upside-down today in this country.

382 Lidane  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:48:37pm

re: #364 brownbagj

It ain’t often that the teenagers get the keys to the car.

/

383 Kid A  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:48:55pm

re: #377 recusancy

Ya, that’s exactly my point. As if the two are mutually exclusive.

384 celticdragon  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:49:13pm

re: #114 Sergey Romanov

I know it’s like beating the dead horse and all that, but I can’t get over it. The West’s Darkest Hour doubles down:

I just looked at his website. *spit*

Evil. Utter, concentrated evil. Reading his screeds is like a glimpse into the very nature of hell and the complete abandonment of civilization in favor of raw hate.

385 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:49:25pm

re: #381 Sergey Romanov

Down the mem’ry lane:

[Link: mediamatters.org…]

Boy the way Glenn Miller played…
Everybody pulled their weight…

//

386 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:50:33pm

re: #384 celticdragon

I just looked at his website. *spit*

Evil. Utter, concentrated evil. Reading his screeds is like a glimpse into the very nature of hell and the complete abandonment of civilization in favor of raw hate.

Honey GoV don’t care.

387 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:51:45pm

re: #384 celticdragon

I just looked at his website. *spit*

Evil. Utter, concentrated evil. Reading his screeds is like a glimpse into the very nature of hell and the complete abandonment of civilization in favor of raw hate.

LOL And still linked over at that white supremacist website, Gates of Vienna.

388 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:52:11pm

re: #356 Gus 802

So. Do you still think President Obama is an “Arab American”?

Oh, how many times I said that. Ab-so-lute-ly not.

I look back and shudder.

389 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:52:43pm

re: #385 Gus 802

Boy the way Glenn Miller played…
Everybody pulled their weight…

//

“Those Were the Day”
All in the Family

Boy the way Glen Miller played
Songs that made the hit parade.
Guys like us we had it made,
Those were the days.

And you knew who you were then,
Girls were girls and men were men,
Mister we could use a man
Like Herbert Hoover again.

Didn’t need no welfare state,
Everybody pulled his weight.
Gee our old LaSalle ran great.
Those were the days.

390 Kronocide  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:53:34pm

re: #221 Killgore Trout

Don’t bother. It’s a waste of time. He’s just spewing talking points.

WHAAAK. TALKING POINT PARROT SEZ OBAMA SUKS WHAAAK.

391 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:54:19pm

re: #388 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Oh, how many times I said that. Ab-so-lute-ly not.

I look back and shudder.

That wasn’t you was it? I mean. Uh. “Chubby Vegan” guy is no longer logged in and…

392 Kronocide  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 1:57:47pm

re: #31 FQ Kafir

It’s not that it’s untrue, it’s that you need to change the term to make it more palatable.

Kinda like Global Warming became “Climate Change.”

It’s called climate change now because of the morons who can’t understand how you can get more snow from a warming world, or, to screw with paranoid jackasses who think it’s some conspiracy to foist some scam on all those smart citizens.

Your canards are so 2007.

393 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 2:00:44pm

re: #381 Sergey Romanov

Down the mem’ry lane:

[Link: mediamatters.org…]

That was then…

this is now:

394 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 2:15:58pm

re: #391 Gus 802

Who? Moi?

395 Gus  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 2:23:49pm

re: #394 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Who? Moi?

OK. Nevermind then. All is forgiven. Have a drink on me. ;)

396 b_sharp  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 2:45:24pm

re: #320 FQ Kafir

Yet who are the ones doing the name-calling? Real logic ya got there. Hope it works for ya.

Did you just call Obdi on his logic?

ROTFLMAO.

Please, look up Dunning-Kruger.

397 Varek Raith  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 4:35:01pm

re: #269 FQ Kafir

You amuse me. Keep it up you silly jester.
:)

398 danarchy  Sun, Jul 31, 2011 4:48:03pm

re: #172 ProLifeLiberal

I am no Tea Party sympathizer, I think tax rates should probably go back to 1999 levels(for everyone).

But comparisons to Norway and Sweden aren’t particularly useful. Norway and Sweden are both low population/rich natural resource countries. In my opinion, their model wouldn’t remotely work for most countries.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 days ago
Views: 134 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1